►
From YouTube: San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting March 18, 2014
Description
San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting March 18, 2014
A
A
Good
item
number
two
is
probably
comment
on
items
not
on
the
agenda.
If
anyone
to
wants
to
comment
on
something
that
is
not
on
the
agenda,
this
is
a
time
for
you.
Hearing.
None,
we'll
move
on
to
item
number
three
announcement
of
conflict
of
interest:
do
any
of
the
commissioners
have
a
conflict
of
interest?
Nope?
A
B
Cheer
Peterson
the
end
commissioners.
Tonight
our
long-range
planning
manager,
Mark
Sullivan,
has
report
on
the
on
the
housing
element
update
we've
been
working
on
the
housing
element
for
this.
This
cycle,
there's
still
a
number
of
items
that
need
to
be
completed
for
this
current
site
2007
through
2014
and
mr.
Sullivan
will
give
us
an
update
of
those
items
that
yet
need
to
be
completed.
Thank
you.
D
Good
evening,
mr.
chair
planning,
commissioners,
as
you
will
recall
at
our
last
meeting
on
on
the
fourth
of
this
month,
we
reviewed
the
housing
element.
Update
process
that
we've
started
towards
adopting
of
a
new
housing
element
at
the
end
of
this
year,
and
part
of
that
process
is
taking
a
look
back
at
the
current
housing
element
and
the
accomplishments
that
we
made
that
the
city
made
in
the
last
seven
years
of
the
housing
element
and
what
remains
to
be
done.
And
basically,
there
are
four
remaining
housing
program.
D
Implementation
actions
that
need
to
be
completed
in
order
for
the
current
housing
element
to
be
compliant
with
state
law.
And
this
is
important
that
the
the
housing
element
be
in
compliance
not
only
just
not
only
for
the
obvious
reason,
but
also
because
it
makes
us
eligible
for
a
streamlined
review
process
in
the
update
of
the
the
upcoming
housing
element
and
that's
important,
because
that
that
housing
element,
the
upcoming
housing
element,
must
be
adopted
by
January
2015
and
the
the
normal
hdcd
housing.
D
The
California
Department
of
Housing
and
Community
Development
review
process
can
take
up
to
120
days.
So
that
puts
a
lot
of
extra
time
in
the
process,
whereas
if
we
qualify
for
the
streamlined
review,
the
the
review
would
be
approximately
60
days,
which
is
what
hcd
is
committed
to
doing.
So
it's
it's
really
a.
D
However,
if
we
don't
make
the
deadline,
then
the
penalty
is
that
you
have
a
four-year
cycle,
so
you
would
have
to
do
it
again
in
2018.
So
there's
really
a
strong
incentive
to
get
this
done
now
and
as
far
as
the
zone
code
amendments
that
were
that
were
discussing
these
were
all
considered
included
in
the
current
housing
element.
They
were
reviewed
by
you.
They
were
the
program's
themselves.
They
were,
they
were
approved
by
both
Planning
Commission
and
the
City
Council.
D
So
what
we're
doing
now
is
getting
around
to
actually
adopting
these
as
part
of
the
the
within
the
zoning
code
and
they're,
basically,
four
items
that
will
come
before
you
as
draft
ordinances
in
the
next
month
to
two
months.
One
of
them
is
for
providing
reasonable
accommodations
for
people
with
disabilities.
The
other
is
a
density
bonus
ordinance.
The
third
is
zoning
for
emergency
shelters
and
the
fourth
is
zoning
for
transitional
and
supportive
housing.
So
I'll
just
go
through
briefly
each
one
of
those,
and
so
as
far
as
the
reasonable
accommodations
provision
goes.
D
They
could
request
exceptions
to
our
zoning
standards
to
allow
changes
that
might
not
you
know
fit
in
with
the
zoning
regular
regulations.
These
could
be
for
ramps.
Walls,
handrails
lifts
that
you
know
it
go
into
the
the
setbacks
or
some
other
thing
that
physically
prevents
you
know
the
the
reasonable
accommodation
from
occurring.
So
we
would
establish
a
process
to
do
that
and
that
would
be
within
the
zoning
code.
The
second
item
is
the
density,
bonus,
ordinance
and
density.
D
Bonus
law
was
established
by
the
state
to
encourage
the
development
of
affordable
housing
and,
basically,
what
it
allows
it.
Actually,
it's
been
in
place
since
1979,
but
they
went
through
a
major
change,
major
changes
in
in
2004,
so
what
it
does
is
it
allows
up
to
thirty-five
percent
density,
bonus
being
meaning
an
increase
in
the
number
of
units
that
would
normally
be
allowed
under
zoning
for
projects
that
provide
affordable
housing
and
it's
a
sliding
scale.
D
So
it
starts
at
about
twenty
percent
and
ramps
up
to
thirty
five
percent,
and
these
are
now
within
state
law,
so
they
exist,
but
we're
also
required
to
adopt
them
within
our
own
zoning
ordinance.
And
what
that
does
is
it
gives
us
a
little
bit
more
control
over
what
happens
in
san
bruno
versus
just
you
know
doing
exactly
what
the
state
code
says.
D
So
I
mentioned
the
density,
the
the
bonuses,
the
ordinance
also-
and
I
think
this
is
something
that
you're
gonna
be
really
interested
in.
Seeing
is
that
it
requires
granting
of
concessions
to
a
developer,
123
concessions
and
those
concessions
can
be
there
generally
to
development
regulations
that
could
be
to
first
setbacks,
reduce
setbacks,
increased
fa
RS,
it
even
includes
height,
so
there
there
are
a
number
of
these
concessions
that
be
sort
of
a
menu
of
those
that
will
be
presented
in
the
draft
ordinance.
D
So,
as
I
mentioned,
that
allows
us
to
have
more
more
local
control
of
how
this
works.
So
that's
the
summary
of
the
density
bonus.
Ordinance.
Third,
is
the
zoning
for
emergency
shelters.
As
you
may
recall,
there
was
there's
a
bill
called
SB
to
which
basically
requires
every
community
in
the
state
to
create
a
zoning
where
emergency
shelters
are
allowed
by
right
with
not
no
discretionary
permit
there.
D
If
they
follow
all
the
the
you
know
the
rules
of
regulations
within
the
code,
then
they
can
produce
the
the
house,
the
emergency
shelter
by
right
and
in
back
in
2009,
both
the
the
Planning
Commission
of
the
City
Council
approved
the
the
general
plan.
The
2009
general
plan,
transit-oriented
development
zone
as
a
location
for
emergency
shelters
in
san
bruno
and
thats
basically
runs
along
el
camino
from
from
angus
avenue
up
to
380
and
then
on
san
bruno
avenue,
from
elm
to
the
railroad
tracks.
D
Fourth
is
regarding
transitional
and
supportive
housing,
and
this
item
is
actually
quite
straightforward.
The
state
law
simply
requires
that
transitional
and
supportive
housing
be
treated
as
a
residential
use
within
residential
zones,
and
so
what
we
are
planning
to
do
is
to
amend
the
definition
of
special
care
facilities
to
include
transitional
and
supportive
housing
and,
as
you
know,
residential
care,
special
residential
care
facilities
are
allowed
in
residential
zones
now
already
so
by
including
the
transitions
for
two
thousand
that
will
fulfill.
D
You
know
that
requirement
so
that
pretty
much
covers
the
the
four
items
that
you
will
be
seeing
in
actual
draft
ordinance
language
in
the
next
30
to
60
days
and
so
we're
working
on
those
on.
You
know
draft
ordinances
right
now
and,
as
I
said,
I
think
within
30
to
60
days,
we'll
bring
them
for
to
you
for
review,
and
hopefully
we
can
get
these
adopted
this
summer
and
qualify
for
the
streamline
review
process
and
so
that
the
housing
element
update
can
go
smoothly.
D
A
Other
have
one
question
you
mentioned
that
the
accomplishing
this
on
a
timely
basis
is
important
not
only
to
meet
state
law
for
these
requirements,
but
to
support
the
shorter
time
period
of
the
housing
element.
Do
you
have
a
a
proposed
schedule
that
gives
calendar
dates
for
each
of
these
activities,
such
as
the
draft.
D
D
Yes,
yeah
we're
were
yes,
the
process.
I
think,
as
I
mentioned
before,
is
we're
working
through
the
21
elements,
the
countywide
21
elements
process.
So
it's
sort
of
it's
a
collaborative
process
where
all
the
cities
in
the
county
are
working
together
and
we,
the
the
draft
housing
elements,
will
be
sent
as
a
group
to
hcd
and
so
they're
aware
so
the
HDD
is
involved
in
this
as
well,
so
we're
working
with
in
there
within
the
required
timeframe
to
get
this
done.
You
know
by
the
deadline,
oh
great
yeah
thank.
A
You,
okay,
any
other
comments
on
this
subject.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
is
item
5a,
which
is
a
public
hearing,
4
16
for
24
Kensington
Avenue.
It's
a
request
for
a
use
permit
to
allow
the
construction
of
an
addition
to
an
existing
two-family
dwelling
which
exceeds
the
point
five
five
floor
area
ratio.
Guideline
of
the
proposed
is
point
five
eight.
This
is
/
12
230v,
two
of
the
San
Bruno
Municipal
Code
staff
report
phase.
Thank.
F
You
and
good
evening,
as
stated,
the
applicant
has
applied
for
a
use
permit
to
construct
an
addition
to
the
existing
duplex
at
416
424
Kensington
Avenue.
The
site
is
located
on
the
north
side
of
Kensington
Kensington
Avenue
and
is
currently
developed
with
an
attached
duplex
consisting
of
two
separate
living
units.
The
existing
units
are
mirror
images
of
one
another.
Each
unit
contains
two
bedrooms:
one
bathroom
a
living
room,
dining
room
and
at
one
car
garage
the
applicant
is
proposing
a
second-story
addition.
F
As
stated,
the
units
are
mirror
image
of
one
another
in
the
proposed
changes
to
each
unit
are
exactly
the
same.
The
second
floor
expansion
consists
of
two
bedrooms
and
one
bathroom
for
each
unit.
The
first
floor
in
each
unit
will
be
modified
to
accommodate
an
internal
stairwell
that
will
create
the
existing
living
area
with
the
proposed
living
area.
Additionally,
the
existing
kitchen
and
dining
room
will
be
relocated
in
both
units.
If
approved
and
constructive,
each
unit
would
contain
three
bedrooms
and
two
bathrooms.
F
Each
unit
would
have
1464
square
feet
of
living
area
with
a
278
square
foot.
One
car
garage,
the
Architectural,
Review
Committee,
did
review
this
project
at
the
februari
meeting,
the
architecture
review
committee
forward
of
the
project
onto
the
Planning
Commission,
with
three
specific
staff
recommendations.
Those
were
to
incorporate
consistent
trim
on
all
existing
and
proposed
windows
and
to
include
a
basic
landscaping
plan
and
to
submit
a
statement
identifying
the
green
building
measures
that
will
be
implemented
at
the
time
of
building
permits
middle.
The
applicant
has
addressed
all
of
these
items.
F
The
project
does
require
use
permit
because
the
addition
is
exceeding
the
point.
Five
five
FA
our
guideline.
The
proposal
is
coming
in
at
point:
five:
eight,
the
fullest
expansion
meets
the
lot
coverage,
setback,
height
and
parking
requirements
of
the
zoning
district
staff.
Mine
says
the
character
of
the
duplex
is
consistent
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood,
which
consists
a
variety
of
different
residential
land
use
types
within
this
neighborhood
is
located
in
the
r2
zoning
district.
There
are
single-family
homes
that
are
duplexes
and
there
are
multi-family
residential
structures.
F
Staff
also
finds
that
the
addition
is
consistent
with
the
residential
design
guidelines.
The
second
story
is
set
back
from
the
first
story
below
on
three
of
the
four
elevations.
That
would
be
the
front
in
both
sides.
The
rear
elevation
is
partially
flush
with
the
first
story
below
and
a
portion
of
that
rear
elevation
overhangs
the
first
four
by
two
feet.
The
addition
will
also
incorporate
a
stucco
finish
in
an
asphalt
roof
which
will
match
the
existing
home.
F
I'd,
also
like
to
point
out
that
the
addition
does
incorporate
a
hip
roof
from
the
front
elevation,
so
it
really
does
help
reduce
the
overall
mass
of
the
addition
step
did
send
a
courtesy
notice
in
the
required
300-foot
legal
notice
to
property
owners.
No
comments
were
received
overall
step,
supports
the
project
and
finds
that
the
addition
is
consistent
with
residential
design
guidelines,
and
we
would
recommend
that
the
Planning
Commission
approve
the
request,
subject
to
findings
of
fact,
one
through
six
and
conditions
of
approval.
One
through
26
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
have.
E
F
F
A
Thank
you
one
other
question
before
I
open
the
public
hearing
on
the
second
floor,
there's
an
uncommon
facade
articulation,
that
is
to
say
the
second
floor,
overhangs
the
first
floor.
There's
no
deck
in
association
with
the
second
floor.
That
would
support
it
going
out.
So
it
just
sort
of
is
is
unusual
that
it
sends
the
head
of
the
rooms
overhang
decks
below.
Is
that
something
that
you
considered
as
to
how
it
might
comport
with
the
housing
design
guidelines?
We.
F
Did
look
at
and
we
did
look
at
that
and
the
residential
design
guidelines
do
recommend
stepping
in
the
second
floor
from
the
first
story
below
and
for
this
specific
proposal,
the
three
of
the
four
elevations
are
stepped
in
from
the
first
story
below
the
front
elevation
has
a
bearing
setback,
I
believe
so
I
kept
ranging
from
eight
feet,
four
inches
to
22
feet,
eight
inches
and
the
second
story
left
and
right
side.
Elevation
is
also
set
back
five
feet:
four
inches
to
18
feet,
two
inches,
while
the
rear
does
overhang
two
feet.
F
C
Just
there's
a
couple
on
item
number,
six
and
number:
seven
number
six.
The
second
portion
of
what
our
Commissioner
indicated
was
no
portion
of
the
resident
shall
be
rented
out
a
secondary
residential
dwelling.
It
is
a
duplex,
so
does
the
whole
language
and
that
number
six
needs
to
be
looked
at
or
just
that
percent,
and
just
that
one
word:
single-family.
F
I
would
say
just
the
first
sentence
really
what
that
saying
is
that
no
portion
of
each
so
there's
two
units
on
site,
so
no
each
unit
wouldn't
be
able
to
create
a
second
residential
dwelling
unit
within
that
within
that
existing
unit.
Essentially,
so
there
can't
be
three
units
on
site.
Two
units
is
the
max,
but.
A
E
Name
is
dawn
McClintock,
373
masuk
evident
in
my
question
regarding
this
gentleman's
process.
Is
that
how
many
parking
spaces
are
there
going
to
be
accommodated
off
street
for
a
three-bedroom
versus
a
two-bedroom?
That's
going
to
increase
the
parking?
The
street
kensington
is
also
very
crowded
street
right
now,
so.
A
Is
a
point
of
information?
I
excuse
me
for
interrupting,
but
we
would
like
to
we
like
to
see
the
African
first
also,
so
you
would
have
the
benefit
of
hearing
their
presentation
perfect.
Thank
you
and
it's
the
applicant
here.
Please
give
your
name
and
street
name
and
make
any
presentation
you
wish.
Thank
you
thank.
G
G
So
when
our
proposal
for
this
application
is
when
we
first
purchased
the
home
back
in
two
thousand
seven,
we
intended
to
live
there
long
term
and
over
the
last
seven
years
you
know
we
started
a
family
and
rather
than
moving
to
a
three-bedroom,
two-bath
home
and
building
our
family
upon
another
location.
We
actually
just
wanted
to
go
ahead
and
build
upon
our
current
location,
because
we
do
love
the
neighborhood
so
much
and
our
neighbors,
we
have
become
very
close
with,
and
they
have
been
there
a
long
time
as
well.
G
So
if
I
could
actually
also
address
this
gentleman's
question
in
regards
to
parking,
so
we
live
on
the
floor.
16
tensing's
inside
and
I'm
intending
to
build
from
two
bedrooms:
two:
three,
because
we
currently
have
one
child
and
we
would
like
to
have
a
second,
so
each
one
would
have
their
own
room
and
then
the
duplex,
the
424
side.
That
is
our
other
friend
who
is
essentially
building
so
that
everything
is
symmetrical.
G
He
would
also
like
a
bigger
home
and
he
can
have
his
own
space
for
that,
but
we
don't
intend
to
have
additional
cars
until
these
children
turn
up
16
or
they
move
out
or
something,
but
on
in
the
very
near
I
guess
in
the
next
16
years.
There
is
no
intent
to
have
additional
cars,
but
we
do
have
where
our
garage
actually
houses
the
car
as
well
as
the
driveway.
G
A
B
B
The
vote
of
the
people
here
in
san
bruno
and
that
pertains
to
aspects
regarding
height
overall
building
height
within
the
transit
corridors
plan
area,
residential
densities
and
being
allowed
to
have
a
of
ground
parking
garages,
but
the
plan
itself
was
adopted
is
in
effect,
can
be
and
is
being
implemented,
but
we
do
expect
to
go
forward
as
the
gentleman
indicated
to
to
bring
a
measure
before
the
voters
to
look
at
those
three
aspects:
building
height
above
ground
garages
and
residential
densities.
We've
been
working
with
a
number
of
consultants,
kind
of
looking
at
upcoming
election
periods.
B
Looking
at
the
issues
in
in
the
plan
itself,
we
have
not
decided
on
a
specific
election
or
date
to
bring
this
matter
forward.
It
is
correct
we
were
looking
at
perhaps
last
November.
Obviously
we
did
not
do
that,
we're
looking
at
possibly
later
on
this
year.
Possibly
this
coming
November,
but
again
that's
under
evaluation,
but
the
plan
itself
is
adopted,
it's
being
implemented.
We
certainly
hope,
as
we
mentioned
at
a
an
earlier
meeting
a
previous
meeting.
We
certainly
hope
to
bring
this
mount
ballot
measure
to
the
voters.
B
We
feel
it's
very,
very
important
to
pass
that
measure
so
that
the
transit
corridors
plan
can
be
fully
implemented
and
the
the
benefits
of
the
plan
in
terms
of
providing
some
incentives,
financial
and
economic
incentives
for
development
and
redevelopment.
We
believe,
are
really
through
seen
that
ballot
measure
move
forward
successfully.
So
we
certainly
will
want
to
bring
that
forward.
We
don't
know
exactly
when
that's
going
to
go
forward
at
this
time.
All
right.
A
E
B
Again
through
the
chair
in
response
to
the
questions
posed
as
I
mentioned,
the
the
areas
the
specific
areas
have
to
do
with
building
heights
within
the
transit
corridors
plan
area,
the
plan
area
is
about
a
150
acres.
It.
It
pertains
to
key
commercial
corridors
here
in
San
Bruno,
for
example,
our
downtown
street
san
mateo
avenue,
huntington,
el
camino,
real
san
bruno
avenue
being
examples.
The
increased
heights
right
now,
our
provisions
of
our
code
limit
building
heights
in
those
areas
to
50
feet
or
three
stories.
B
The
measure
that
would
go
before
the
voters
would
allow
for
increasing
building
heights
in
various
locations
within
the
plan
area
and
those
increased
Heights
would
range
from
being
allowed
to
go
to
say,
55
feet
and
four
stories
on
san
mateo
avenue
to
as
as
high
as
seven
stories
near
the
caltrain
station
in
that
vicinity
and
65
feet
along
el
camino
rial.
So
it
depends
on
the
area,
the
specific
area
within
the
overall
transit
quarters
plan,
and
so
that's
one
aspect.
B
Looking
at
increased
building
heights,
another
would
be
to
allow
for
above
ground
parking
garages
within
again
just
the
plan
area.
The
hundred
and
fifty
acres,
the
corridors,
the
commercial
corridors
just
in
those
areas
and
then
also
looking
at
allowing
for
increased
residential
densities.
Nice
residential
densities
have
to
do
with
the
fact
that
ordinance
1284,
that's
in
effect,
which
was
adopted
in
1977,
restricted
residential
densities
in
certain
areas
to
the
densities
that
were,
in
effect,
the
residentials
that
densities
that
were
in
effect
in
1974.
So
we
would
allow
for
increased
density.
B
So
that's
a
little
more
detail
and
the
economic
and
financial
incentives
that
we're
talking
about.
Obviously,
that,
as
you
allow
for
increased
building
heights,
increased
residential
densities
allow
for
both
ground
parking
garages,
the
land
values,
the
potential
development
opportunities
for
these
properties
increases,
and
we
believe
that
would
provide
incentive
to
redevelop,
develop
and
redevelop
certain
properties
within
the
plant
area.
I
can't
be
too
much
more
specific
about
when
the
valve
measure
would
go
forward.
B
We
would
hope
that
perhaps
November
of
this
year,
that
would
be
the
soonest
that
we
could
bring
that
forward
and
again
that's
something
that
you
know
we're
evaluating
and
as
I
say
evaluating.
You
know
the
City
Council,
the
city
manager
staff
are
evaluating.
You
know
that
that
issue,
and
as
soon
as
we
have
a
good
idea
as
to
when
we
can
go
forward
with
this,
will
certainly
let
people
know
there,
there's
really
an
important
educational
aspect
to
this.
The
people
here
are
right.
B
The
the
plan
was
adopted
and-
and
there
hasn't
been
a
lot
of
discussion
about
this
important,
really
important
plan
for
the
community
and
its
merits
and
I.
Think
part
of
what
we
need
to
do
is
to
kind
of
bring
this
forward
again
and
talk
about
the
plan
and
what
it
means
for
San
Bruno
and
the
importance
of
seeing
if
fully
implemented.
So
that's
that
public
outreach
component
is
certainly
something
that
we
need
to
do
in
advance
of
bringing
such
an
important
measure
before
the
voters.
So
that's
a
little
more
detail
again
at
this
point.
A
E
F
E
A
E
A
A
F
You,
as
stated
the
use
permit
and
parking
exception,
is
required
to
establish
a
martial
arts
studio
with
in
the
CBD
zoning
district.
The
site
itself
is
located
on
the
east
side
of
San
Mateo
Avenue
is
currently
developed
with
a
commercial
building
consisting
of
two
separate
storefronts.
The
proposed
martial
arts
studio
will
occupy
a
2500
square-foot
space.
The
applicant
plans
to
offer
a
variety
of
classes
ranging
from
karate
Tae,
Bo,
foxy
and
flex
training.
The
general
hours
of
operation
would
be
monday
through
friday,
7am
to
9
p.m.
and
saturdays
6am,
to
2
p.m.
F
on
the
applicant
is
also
proposing
to
incorporate
a
retail
component
they'll
display
and
sell
product
lines
really
related
to
the
martial
arts
industry.
The
retail
component
will
have
the
same
hours
of
operation,
which
would
be
monday
through
friday,
7am
to
9
p.m.
and
saturdays
6am.
To
2pm,
as
stated
use,
permit
is
required
to
establish
a
martial
arts
studio
with
in
the
CBD
zoning
district.
F
The
intent
of
the
use
permit
process
is
to
really
evaluate
the
proposed
use
in
relation
to
the
existing
environment
and
to
ensure
that
it
won't
have
a
negative
effect
on
those
land
uses
in
the
overall
neighborhood
staff
finds
that
the
proposed
use
will
be
a
positive
addition
to
the
downtown
environment
classes
are
offered
throughout
the
entire
day,
which
will
bring
greater
foot
traffic
to
say,
matteau
Avenue,
which
will
benefit
the
existing
businesses
downtown.
Additionally,
the
applicant
will
incorporate
a
retail
component.
F
The
actual
retail
component
will
consist
of
500
square
feet
and
will
be
dedicated
to
sleep
retail
sales.
The
retail
hours
of
operation
would
be
monday
through
friday,
7am
to
9
p.m.
and
saturday
6am
to
2pm
staff
finds
that
the
proposed
hours
of
operation
are
consistent
with
other
retail
land
uses
on
San
Mateo
Avenue.
The
retail
retail
component
will
create
an
inviting
storefront,
which
is
really
important
in
any
downtown
environment.
F
Regarding
parking,
the
martial
arts
studio
requires
three
more
parking
spaces
than
the
previous
retail
use.
There
are
two
city-owned
parking
lots
located
to
the
rear
of
the
subject
site.
Those
two
lots
when
combined
amount
hour,
147
parking
spaces
steph
has
previously
conducted
a
number
of
parking
studies
in
the
downtown
area,
and
the
results
of
our
analysis
and
survey
indicate
that
both
parking
lots
are
underutilized
and
we're
not
near
that
eighty-five
percent
occupancy
rate
that
staff
considers
when
determining.
If
an
area
is
parking,
an
impact.
F
Therefore,
staff
buys
that
the
parking
needs
for
the
martial
arts
studio
will
be
met
with
the
two
nearby
city-owned
parking
lots
step
did
say
the
public
notice
to
all
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
site
we
did
not
receive
any
comments
regarding
the
proposed
use
staff
would
recommend
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
the
use
permit
and
parking
exception
request
based
on
findings
of
fact,
one
through
five
and
conditions
of
approval
1
through
19
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
C
Wanted
to
check,
if,
if
you
had
the
opportunity
to
to
speak
with
the
applicants
about
this
saturday
hours,
I
thought
I
heard
you
say
two
o'clock
and
knowing
that
new
businesses
and
the
type
of
service
they
provided,
they
might
be
requested
for
longer
hours,
which
would
mean
it
needs
to
come
back
planning
commission
or
to
the
department,
not
quite
sure
what
the
process
is.
However,
I
just
thought
I
would
just
chicken
about
that.
If.
C
A
H
H
I
wake
up
very
early
before
the
chickens
and
I
I
Drive
down
el
camino
and
every
time
I
Drive
by
to
Avenue
the
light
sets
lit
up
is
just
absolutely
beautiful
about
four
thirty
in
the
morning
and
I
just
think
it's
it's
majestic
to
be
able
to
go
by
that
downtown
area
and
I.
Just
I've
been
successful
for
the
last
20
years,
creating
my
business
and
every
time
I've
moved
I've
been
in
two
locations.
H
One
was
right
next
to
the
rib
shack
and
at
our
current
location,
at
seven
thirty,
one
canes
and
I've
had
a
positive
impact
with
both
of
those
blocks.
Every
time
we've
been
there,
we
promote
a
positive
lifestyle.
We
promote
an
active
lifestyle
which
translates
to
people
shopping
more
being
outside,
more
and
really
enjoying
and
being
an
active
part
of
the
community.
H
So
I
appreciate
your
listening,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
about
our
operations,
specifically
to
address
Commissioner
Johnson's
thought
on
the
hours.
The
reason
why
the
Saturday
hours
are
posted,
as
that
is
after
2pm,
we
have
seminars
and
other
things
that
are
a
little
bit
more
episodic
in
nature,
where
they
can't
be
specifically
we'll
every
single
Saturday
but
I
would
say
two
to
three
times
a
month.
C
That
speaks
that
you
are
using
the
facility
after
two
o'clock
and
and
of
different
avenues,
which
is
certainly
your
choice
and
privilege,
and
so
that
speaks
to
the
fact
that
possibly
having
that
those
hours
change
at
this
time
might
be
to
a
benefit.
So
something
for
you
to
consider
what
doesn't
change
our
anything
on
our
end.
But
it
would
like
you
to
know
that.
Thank.
A
C
No
further
discussion
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
youth
from
at
1400
five
and
parking
exception,
14001,
based
on
the
fines
of
X
1
through
5
and
conditions
of
approval
1
through
19.
There
was
some
discussion
regarding
the
hours,
so
I
don't
know
if
farm
does
should
be
part
of
this
motion
or
not,
but
certainly
if
you
can
give
you
direction
on
that
conditioner
and
I.
A
F
So
I
just
want
to
cover
a
few
staff
follow-up
items
at
the
January
planning
commission
meeting
staff
was
asked
to
follow
up
on
some
separate
items.
Item
number
one
was
growing:
a
potential
limousine
business
located
within
a
single
family
dwelling
on
parkview
drive,
and
the
second
item
was
in
electronic
sign
located
at
1590,
el
camino
al
staff
did
for
both
of
these
items
to
the
code
enforcement
division.
Regarding
the
potential
limousine
business,
the
code
enforcement
division
recently
issued
a
notice
of
violation.
F
This
matter
is
currently
being
reviewed
by
the
code
enforcement
vision,
division
and
staff
will
provide
an
update
regarding
the
status
of
this
case
at
a
future
planning
commission
meeting
regarding
the
electronic
sign
at
1590
el
camino
al,
the
code
enforcement
department
did
issue
a
notice
of
violation.
The
sign
was
flashing
and
included
off-site
advertising,
which
is
prohibited
by
the
municipal
code
and
the
property
took
care
of
the
violations,
and
the
electronic
sign
is
meeting
all
of
the
municipal
code
requirements
and
that
code
enforcement
case
has
been
closed.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
B
A
E
Sure
is
it,
korea
says
20
I
mean
I
know
we
had
a
meeting
a
march
for
that
it
was
a
true
Planning
Commission
being,
but
there
was
no
minutes
or
anything
that
was,
you
know,
generated
from
that
and
I
just
gotta
thought
we
probably
should
add.
There
was
obviously
discussion
or
you
know
presentation
should
have.
Maybe
perhaps
we
should
have
some
form
of
written
communication
at
that
took
place,
but
your
thought
through.
B
The
chair,
if
I,
could
respond
that
was
a
regular
planning
commission
meeting.
We
know
we
often
don't
meet
on
that
first
Tuesday,
but
it
it
is
considered
a
regular
meeting
and
we
will
have
minutes.
We
didn't
have
time
to
get
those
minutes
put
together.
You
will
receive
minutes
for
your
review
and
editing
and
we
hope
to
get
those
to
you
at
the
next
meeting.
So
we'll
get
those
to
you
for
sure.
Thank.
B
Sure,
if
I
could,
if
one
one
quick
comment,
just
just
to
mention
to
the
full
commission,
that
there
is
a
planning
commissioners
academy
here
locally
in
burlingame
next
week
and
cheer
peterson
myself
are
going
to
go
to
that
there'll
be
an
opportunity
for
updates
on
such
things
as
sequa
conduct
of
meetings,
Planning,
Commission
meetings,
design,
review
roles
and
responsibilities
of
the
Planning
Commission,
so
it's
Wednesday,
Thursday
and
Friday
of
next
week
in
burlingame,
so
we'll
be
attending
that
and
we
all
share
back
information
with
you
materials
and
so
forth.
From
that
meeting.
Thank
you.
A
On
that
subject,
I'll
be
attending
that
with
director
Walter
E
and
it's
my
plan
to
gather
as
much
material
as
I
can
and
PDF
it
and
post
it
on
the
web,
so
the
entire
Commission
can
benefit
from
it.
I
haven't
been
personally
to
League
of
Cities
Planning
Commission
presentation
for
a
number
of
years
and
I
suspect.
That's
true
for
many
of
the
members,
so
I
think
it'd
be
valuable
to
make
an
aggressive
approach
to
sharing
that
information.