►
From YouTube: JUN 13, 2023 | City Council Afternoon Session
Description
City of San José, California
City Council Afternoon Session, June 13, 2023
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be held at San José City Hall and also accessible via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=1088259&GUID=7CB8B65A-0BD3-466D-881E-489B69EF1D08
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
C
B
B
Just
for
those
who
are
wondering
when
we
call
in
remotely
we
have
to
state
if
anyone
else
is
in
the
room
with
us,
so
that
is
that's
what
that's
all
about:
okay,
we're
back
from
Recess!
Thank
you
all
for
being
here,
we
are
going
to
begin
the
afternoon
session
with
an
invocation
from
Pastor
Robert
Mize
of
the
Cathedral
of
Faith
and
council.
Member
Davis
will
tell
us
more.
G
The
Cathedral
of
Faith
has
called
San
Jose
home
since
1965
and
has
blessed
many
San
Jose
residents
with
hot
meals
and
Faith.
Since
then,
during
and
even
since
the
pandemic,
the
Cathedral
of
Faith
in
partnership
with
their
neighbors
Second
Harvest
Food
Bank,
have
worked
tirelessly
to
keep
San
Jose
families
fed.
They
continue
to
ensure
that
no
residents
go
hungry
by
hosting
a
food
distribution
twice
a
week
on
Wednesdays
and
Thursdays
from
9
A.M
to
noon
at
the
Gilroy,
Morgan,
Hill
and
Milpitas
locations.
H
H
I
just
pray
God
that
as
they
conduct
business
today,
that
they
would
do
so
with
mercy
and
compassion,
Lord,
give
them
wisdom
and
understanding,
and
especially
today,
I
pray
that
you
would
help
them
as
they
make
decisions
that
would
affect
those
that
are
hungry,
those
that
don't
have
enough
to
eat,
and
we
thank
you
for
that
today.
In
the
name
that
is
above
all
name,
the
name
of
Jesus
Amen.
B
E
All
right
good
afternoon,
everybody
today
we
will
be
honoring
an
extraordinary
woman
and
community
champion
within
our
community
Samina
Usman
Samina
served
for
nearly
two
decades
as
the
senior
government
relations
coordinator
with
the
Council
on
American
Islamic
relations
or
care,
while
I
care,
Samina,
coordinated
and
held
over
800
meetings
with
elected
officials
and
staff
to
advocate
for
over
250
federal
state,
county
and
local
bills,
ordinances
and
resolutions.
E
Her
countless
efforts
have
helped
close
the
gap
between
the
bay
area's
Muslim
Community
and
the
government
officials
to
create
positive
changes.
She
has
also
extended
her
knowledge
to
the
community
by
giving
over
180
workshops
and
trainings
to
community
groups,
universities
and
diverse
places
of
worship,
as
well
as
speaking
at
numerous
rallies.
Samina's
work
plays
a
key
role
in
bringing
attention
to
social
justice
issues
and
amplifying
the
voices
of
underrepresented
communities.
E
I
Thank
you
so
much
councilman,
American,
Dallas
and
also
to
the
San
Jose
City
Council
I,
wanted
to.
It
is
truly
an
honor
to
have
not
only
be
recognized
for
tonight,
but
also
for
the
years
of
being
able
to
work
with
the
city
in
order
to
push
for
policies
related
to
social
justice
and
racial
equity,
and
so
I'm
very
thankful.
To
be
able
to
have
been
able
to
do
this
work,
and
so
I
am
going
to
be
transitioning
to
a
support
life
foundation
and
also
secure
justice
as
well
Consulting
for
them.
I
And
so
this
isn't
the
last
that
you're
going
to
see
of
me
and
I'm
still
going
to
be
working
towards
these
issues
of
racial
equity
and
also
to
ensure
that
those
who
are
the
most
marginalized,
the
most
in
need
of
our
help,
will
get
it
from
our
city.
And
so
I
want.
To
also
add
that
we
really
need
to
we're.
I
B
B
B
J
Thank
you,
mayor
and
I'd
love
to
invite
representatives
from
Amigos
de
Guadalupe
to
join
us.
J
J
Just
yesterday
we
had
the
privilege
of
honoring
our
Filipino
Community
during
the
Philippines
Independence
Day
and
I'm,
proud
to
present
to
represent
little
Portugal
here
at
City
Hall.
Those
immigrants
have
contributed
contributed
to
so
much
of
who
we
are
today.
They've
worked
in
every
sector
of
our
economy
started
businesses
that
anchor
our
community
and
economy
and
have
become
community
and
neighborhood
leaders.
J
All
too
often,
immigrants
have
had
to
overcome
discrimination,
exploitation
and
deliberate
racist
policies
from
local
governments.
It's
been
through
the
power
of
organizing
oftentimes
across
lines
of
nationality,
that
immigrants
have
been
able
to
challenge
the
city
to
live
up
to
its
democratic
ideals
and
values.
J
While
much
progress
has
been
made
in
making
San
Jose
a
more
welcoming
place
for
immigrants
that
work
will
never
stop.
That's
why
I'm
grateful
to
be
joined
by
amigos
de
Guadalupe,
an
East
San
Jose
organization
that
has
been
doing
great
work
in
advocating
for
better
conditions
for
our
immigrant
families.
K
K
Or
this
presentations.
K
K
K
K
L
So
I
will
just
be
repeating
the
same
message
that
my
colleague
Gina
just
said,
but
in
English.
So
thank
you
to
council
member
Ortiz
for
the
proclamation
and
celebration
of
immigrant
Heritage
Month
Amigos
de
Guadalupe
Center
for
justice
and
empowerment
began
its
work
in
East
San
Jose
in
2012
and
is
located
in
Mayfair
a
community
based
off
East
San
Jose.
We
provide
services
to
immigrants
throughout
housing,
homelessness,
prevention,
immigration,
Legal,
Services,
educational
support,
Community,
organizing
English
and
citizenship
classes,
tax,
filing
assistance
and
Mental
Health
Services.
L
In
addition,
Amigos
hires
a
majority
of
its
staff
from
the
local
community
and
is
one
of
the
five
founding
agencies
of
the
sisa
puede
collective.
Our
core
belief
is
that
everyone,
no
matter
where
you
come
from,
deserves
to
live
in
a
just
and
Equitable
Society,
where
every
person
is
empowered
to
achieve
their
dreams.
L
B
B
M
B
So
today
we
commemorate
a
significant
milestone
in
our
nation's
history,
Juneteenth
also
known
as
emancipation
day,
which
we
celebrate,
which
celebrates
June
19th
of
1865.
When
the
last
of
the
newly
freed
African
Americans
in
Galveston
Texas
were
notified
well,
the
whole
town
was
notified
of
the
end
of
slavery.
B
This
event
took
place
two
years
after
Abraham
Lincoln's
Emancipation
Proclamation
went
into
effect
a
poignant
reminder
of
our
belief
that
no
one
is
free
until
we
are
all
free,
while
this
pivotal
Proclamation
brought
Liberation
and
hope
to
countless
lives.
Juneteenth
is
a
reminder
for
us
of
the
ongoing
struggle
for
equality
and
opportunity
in
our
society.
B
As
we
reflect
on
the
significance
of
Juneteenth,
we
must
acknowledge
that
the
fight
for
True
Freedom
inequality
is
far
from
over.
Today
we
honor
the
resilience,
strength
and
determination
of
those
who
endured
the
horrors
of
slavery,
fought
for
their
freedom
and
paved
the
way
for
generations
to
come
today,
in
addition
to
recognizing
the
federal
holiday.
Today,
with
our
Proclamation,
we
want
to
also
honor
the
African-American
Community
Service
Agency
you'll,
hear
from
Milan
Valentin
in
just
a
moment.
B
For
the
more
than
40
years,
they
have
worked
in
our
community
to
provide
education,
cultural
programs
and
vital
Social
Services
to
so
many
members
of
our
community
and
I've
had
the
privilege
since
being
elected
mayor
of
sitting
down
and
spending
a
little
time
with
their
staff
in
San
Jose.
We
celebrate
diversity
and
see
it
as
our
core
strength,
and
we
strive
to
continue
to
create
a
community
where
everyone
feels
safe,
respected,
valued
and
is
empowered
to
achieve
their
full
potential.
B
In
closing,
I'd
like
to
express
my
gratitude
to
all
of
those
who,
in
our
Legacy
as
a
nation,
fought
for
freedom
inequality
and
continue
that
fight
today,
I
want
to
turn
the
microphone
over
to
my
colleague,
council
member
Omar
Torres,
to
say
a
few
words
and
then
you'll
hear
from
Milan
ballinton
the
executive
director
of
the
African-American
Community
Service
Agency.
Thank
you.
N
Thank
you,
mayor,
hello,
everyone
for
over
150
years,
the
African-American
Community
has
cherished
and
celebrated
Juneteenth.
It
wasn't
until
June
17th
2021
that
this
day
was
officially
recognized
as
the
11th
Federal
Holiday
by
President
Biden
Juneteenth
holds
a
unique
place
in
our
nation's
narrative.
It
serves
a
day
that
kick-started
the
post-emancipation
period,
known
as
reconstruction,
it
symbolizes
the
beginning
of
a
new
chapter
in
The
Journey
towards
freedom
and
equality
for
African
Americans.
N
It
is
important
that
this
history
is
not
erased
as
we're
suing
book
bands
and
Erasure
of
our
history.
We
must
reflect
upon
the
struggles
endured
by
those
who
were
enslaved,
who
worked
relentlessly
in
the
agricultural
fields
and
who
were
denied
the
basic
rights
and
privilege
that
that
many
of
us
take
for
granted.
N
They
are
an
amazing
partner
in
our
city
providing
Services
of
Education
Health
and
Wellness
Economic
Development
Social,
Services,
racial
and
social
justice.
May
they
may
their
work,
continue
to
a
lift,
Inspire
and
create
a
brighter
future
for
generations
to
come.
I
now
have
the
honor
to
pass
it
over
to
Milan
Valentine
executive
director
of
the
African-American
Community
Service
Agency
trustee
for
Franklin
McKinley,
School
District,
and
my
former
sjsu
classmate,
so
Milan.
O
O
I
knew
I
had
a
team
back
there
somewhere,
so
my
name
is
Milan
ballantyn
and
I
currently
serve
as
the
executive
director
of
the
African-American
community
service
agency
and
in
my
12
years
of
service,
one
of
the
most
prized
possessions
is
our
Juneteenth
Festival.
When
we
talk
about,
where
do
we
come
from
as
a
community?
O
You
will
also
hear
from
one
of
the
representatives
from
Comerica
Bank
regarding
diversity
in
deceased
Suites,
which
represents
a
less
of
a
population
of
black
people
in
the
c-suite.
We
have
the
kids
and
family
Arena
and
resources,
and
we're
still
educating
about
covet
so
make
sure
that
you
come
out
and
have
a
good
time.
We
thank
the
city
council,
mayor
Mahan
and
my
San
Jose
State
Spartans
in
the
room
with
councilman
Torres,
and
we
also
brought
some
San
Jose
State
students
with
us
to
keep
training
and
developing
the
generation
behind
us.
O
B
That's
okay
got
somewhere
Torres,
so
today's
meeting
will
be
adjourned
in
memory
of
the
remarkable
and
dedicated
Dr
Daniel
Coleman,
who
passed
away
on
May
20th
of
2023.
Dr
Coleman
was
an
incredible
and
passionate
counselor
at
the
Washington
United
youth
center
for
many
years
and
worked
tirelessly
with
underserved
youth
in
the
Washington
Guadalupe
neighborhood
council
member
Torres
will
say
a
few
words
on
Dr,
Coleman's
impact
and
I
believe
we
have
a
few
friends
and
family
members
here
as
well.
Who
may
briefly
say
a
few
words.
N
Being
here,
thank
you:
go
ahead,
council
member.
Thank
you
mayor.
Yes,
on
May
20th
2023,
we
received
a
devastating
news
of
the
sudden
passing
of
Dr
Daniel
Coleman
Daniel
was
not
only
a
valued
member
of
Catholic
Charities
of
Silicon
Valley,
but
also
a
dedicated
advocate
for
youth
in
the
Washington
neighborhood
youth.
Like
me,
his
unwavering
commitment
to
serving
others,
particularly
through
his
work
at
the
United
at
the
Washington
United
youth
center,
has
left
a
lasting
impact
on
the
lives
of
countless
individuals
and
families
in
our
Washington
neighborhood.
N
We
extend
our
deepest
condolences
to
Daniel's
family
friends
and
colleagues
during
this
difficult
time.
May
his
memory
continue
to
inspire
us
and
may
his
legacy
live
on
to
the
work
through
the
work
we
do
to
uplift
and
support
our
youth
in
our
community
in
remnants
in
remembrance
of
Dr
Daniel
comments
are
getting
a
little
bit
emotional
here.
Let
us
strive
to
carry
forward
his
vision
of
a
world
where
every
young
person
is
given
the
opportunity
to
thrive
and
reach
their
full
potential.
P
Thank
you
councilmember
Torres,
mayor
Mann
and
members
of
the
council.
My
name
is
Greg
kepperly,
I'm
the
CEO
of
Catholic
Charities
of
Santa,
Clara,
County
and
I
had
the
pleasure
of
working
and
being
a
friend
of
Dr
Daniel
Coleman
for
many
years,
the
past
seven
years
on
behalf
of
Catholic
Charities
and
our
staff
and
volunteers.
I
want
to
thank
the
council
for
honoring
the
memory
of
Dan,
our
beloved
friend
and
colleague,
who
passed
away
on
May
20th.
P
We
appreciate
the
outpouring
of
Community
Support,
including
from
the
council
from
many
City
staff,
prns
staff
and
the
San
Jose
Youth,
Empowerment,
Alliance
and
community
members
who
work
so
closely
with
Dr
Dan,
Dan's
therapeutic
work
with
youth
and
his
collaborative
leadership
at
the
Washington
United
youth
center
and
throughout
the
city,
and
the
county
was
characterized
by
clinical
expertise.
His
Compassionate
Heart.
P
Is
non-judgmental
kind
listening
nature
and
is
joyful
and
playful
sense
of
humor
as
the
Director
of
Catholic
Charities,
youth,
empowered
for
success
and
our
best
program?
Dan,
truly
lived
Catholic
Charities
mission
of
changing
lives
for
Good
by
building
everyone's
strengths.
Together
he
was
the
best.
Let
us
honor
his
memory
by
being
more
like
Dr
Dan,
Dr,
Daniel,
Coleman,
presente.
Q
I'm
Bill,
Coleman,
I'm,
Daniel's,
dad
and
I
simply
want
to
thank
the
council,
in
particular
council
member
Torres
and
Greg,
for
that
kind
kind
speech
about
my
son.
He
passed
away
very
unexpectedly,
but
in
being
over
here
and
going
through
the
funeral
and
last
week
it
was
very
gratifying
to
see
the
effect
that
he'd
had
on
the
community
and
so
I
just
like
to
again
thank
you
for
this
great
honor
of
recognition
and
thank
you
very
much.
B
We
are
going
to
move
on
now
to
items
3.4
and
5,
which
will
be
heard
concurrently,
I.
We
will
need
to
vote
on
them
separately,
any
changes
to
and
I'm
going
to
ask
that
we
take
up
the
vote
first
on
item
3.5,
because
I
could
potentially
have
implications
on
the
broader
budget,
it's
the
more
specific
item
and
has
a
higher
threshold
for
any
changes
to
occur.
So
we'll
we'll
discuss
3.4
3.5
together,
we
will
hear
public
comment
on
them
together
in
terms
of
public
comment.
B
As
those
of
you
been
following
along
may
know,
the
council
listened
very
thoughtfully
to
nearly
six
hours
of
public
comment
last
night
that
was
our
second
public
hearing.
B
I
really
want
to
recognize
staff
for
the
our
unsung
heroes,
who
have
put
in
many
long
days
entertaining
various
proposals
helping
to
evaluate
budget
requests,
crunching
the
numbers,
a
million
different
ways,
so
Jim
Shannon
in
particular
you
and
your
team
in
the
budget
office
I-
think
have
just
done
a
tremendous
job
and
I
appreciate
that,
even
when,
when
our
team
and
I
know
our
colleagues
have
all
done,
this
have
come
to
you
with
hey.
Have
you
looked
at
it?
B
This
way,
you've
always
been
willing
to
put
together
a
new
chart
or
table
or
graph
or
whatever
it
is
to
help
us
understand
different
ways
of
analyzing
the
data.
So
in
terms
of
public
comments,
specifically,
though
I
may
have
a
few
more
remarks
after
that,
but
I
want
to
limit
it
to
one
hour.
I,
don't
want
anyone
to
feel
that
we're
trying
to
cut
them
off,
but
we'll
do
one
minute
comments
for
no
more
than
an
hour
we'll
see
if
we
have
that
many
comments.
B
I
just
think
that,
given
the
six
hours
yesterday
and
all
of
the
input
we've
heard,
I
think
it's
important
that
we
give
ourselves
time
to
get
into
the
council
discussion
and
deliberation
and
get
to
vote,
but
I
certainly
don't
want
anyone
to
feel
that
we're
trying
to
reduce
their
input.
So
with
that
once
again,
thank
you
so
much
to
staff
look
forward
to
returning
to
the
council
for
discussion
and
let's
take
public
comment
until
about
three
o'clock.
C
R
My
name
is
Kelsey
and
I'm
in
D9
and
I
support
the
budget
collaboratively
proposed
by
council
member
Foley
vice
mayor,
kameh
and
mayor
Mayhem
I
understand
the
argument
regarding
affordable
housing.
I
myself
was
20
pregnant
and
sleeping
on
a
friend's
floor
because
I
couldn't
afford
anything
else,
but
here's
the
reality.
Measure
e
is
not
the
only
Avenue
for
low-income
housing
Revenue,
but
it
is
the
most
reasonable
Avenue
for
emergency
interim
housing.
The
argument
that
reallocating
measure
e
funds
is
ignoring
the
need
for
low-income
housing
is
cherry.
Picking
the
details.
R
We
cannot
continue
to
put
very
expensive
Band-Aids
on
homelessness.
We
need
a
solution.
The
plan
that
council
member
Davis
has
proposed
is
false,
hope
of
change
and
merely
maintains
the
status
quo.
I
urge
you
to
join
council
member
Foley
vice
mayor
kame
and
mayor
Mahan,
and
vote
Yes
on
the
budget
as
they
have
proposed
it.
It
is
time
to
do
something
different.
It
is
time
to
challenge
the
status
quo.
Thank
you.
Next
speaker.
S
Hi,
my
name
is
Debbie
Yao
I
live
in
District
7.
I
am
here
as
a
member
of
show
up
for
racial
Justice,
which
is
part
of
Sacred
Heart
I,
believe
that
all
people
deserve
a
place
to
call
home
I
believe
that
all
here
share
my
concerns
about
the
houseless
population
in
our
city,
I
believe
that
we
all
understand
that
both
interim
and
new
permanent
housing
are
part
of
this
solution.
S
T
There's
many
examples
of
things
that
don't
work,
but
also
there
are
examples
of
things
that
do
work
and
you
know
I'm
part
of
the
Sikh
Community,
the
Punjabi
community,
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
are
asked
to
do
is
take
care
of
our
community.
Take
care
of
of
the
people
who
are
less
fortunate
like
it
has
been
mentioned,
it's
very
difficult
to
think
of
anything
when
you
don't
have
a
roof
over
your
head
ability
to
find
work
and
I
think
this
plan
addresses.
U
Hi,
my
name
is
gurbender
mavi
I've
been
a
longtime
resident
of
San
Jose
over
30
years,
and
we've
seen
the
term
Working
Poor
take
a
new
meaning
over
the
last
five
seven
ten
years,
while
building
the
most
wealth
anywhere
in
history
in
the
world
and
when
you're
doing
when
you're
a
single
parent
and
you're
working
one
job
on
minimum
wage,
you
can't
even
afford
your
family
to
live
in
a
good
place.
I
wholeheartedly
support
mayor,
mahan's
Budget
on
the
tiny
homes
in
the
long-term,
affordable
housing.
U
V
My
name
is
Roberta
I'm
from
district.
One
I
support
the
mayor's
plan
to
increase
the
funding
for
interim
housing
over
the
Davis
memo,
which
would
only
maintain
the
status
quo.
50
million
dollars
for
interim
and
50
million
dollars
for
affordable
housing
is
more
than
reasonable.
When
we
have
thousands
of
people
living
on
our
streets
right
now,
I
recently
became
involved
with
the
tent
dweller
along
the
creek.
In
my
neighborhood
yesterday,
I
took
her
to
the
County
Office
of
Supportive
Housing.
V
There
I
met
the
representative
that
took
her
paperwork
and
he
told
us
that
more
and
more
people
are
coming
in,
like
her
already
have
their
paperwork
and
ready
to
move
off
the
streets.
The
problem
is
interim.
Housing
needs
to
be
available
so
that
they
can
find
these
people
when
housing
is
available
and
when
they
are
next
in
line,
if
they
go
back
in
the
streets,
they're
lost.
So
please
support
the
Nature's
plan
next
speaker.
W
Okay,
hello,
I'm,
Stephen,
joffe
I'm
from
councilman
tours
District
live
here
in
the
center
of
the
city.
I
just
want
to
say,
I,
totally
support
the
mayor's
plan.
I
think
that
we
have
to
focus
on
the
core
issues,
the
core
issues
affecting
our
city
now
to
see
if
we
can
make
movement.
The
three
things
that
I
understand
are
core
are
the
interim
housing
proposal
and
the
proposal
in
which
safe
locations
for
RVs
and
people
living
in
in
vehicles
to
really
get
people
out
of
encampments.
W
Secondly,
a
focus
on
hiring
police
training,
recruiting
and
retention,
as
well
as
EMTs,
which
is
actually
a
core
safety
issue
for
anybody
who
lives
here
in
the
center
of
the
city
and
my
understanding
of
third
priority
is
that
in
fact,
the
blight
grants
from
the
federal
government
are
running
out
and
we
need
to
continue
this
in
the
city,
so
we
don't
have
a
Band-Aid
situation
that
we
deal
with
on
a
short-term
basis.
These
are
core
issues
that
we
all
live
with
in
the
city.
W
C
You
so
much
I'm,
also
calling
down
Cheryl
Gia
fan
and
Janice
Conde
go
ahead.
X
Hi
I'm
Ed
Lambert
I'm
an
immigrant
as
well
from
Belgium,
so
this
is
a
great
day
for
me.
Lived
in
San
Jose,
since
1987
three
different
districts
worked
with
many
volunteer
groups
have
been
a
part
of
two
Banks
working
with
small
businesses
in
the
city,
so
I
think
I've
got
a
pretty
good
idea
of
the
way
things
have
gone
before.
X
The
definition
of
insanity
is
to
try
the
same
thing
over
and
over
again
thinking
you're
going
to
have
a
different
outcome.
This
budget
needs
to
be
looked
at
in
its
entirety,
not
in
just
one
spot.
X
Mayor
Matt
was
elected
with
a
Clear,
Vision
and
I
think
it
would
be
great
to
give
him
a
chance
to
carry
it
out.
That's
why
he
won
and
that's
why
we
voted
for
him
regarding
measure
e.
The
emergency
we
face
today
requires
a
shift
in
focus
to
shelters
in
affordable
housing.
We
didn't
see
that
coming.
What
I
would
also
suggest
to
the
council
is
given
the
fact
that
the
amounts
in
Missouri
are
a
rounding
error
to
accompany
the
size
of
Google.
Perhaps
we
can
approach
Google
and
ask
them
to
convert.
C
Y
That's
what
council
members
said.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
You
know.
I
am
not
a
budget
expert
and
I'm,
not
a
homeless
expert,
but
I
do
work
on
the
streets
of
the
city
almost
every
single
day.
Trying
to
drive
this
city
forward
and
I
can
tell
you
over
the
last
four
or
five
years,
we're
not
trending
in
the
right
direction.
Y
You
know,
I
I
think
we're
making
some
progress,
but
I
think
the
city
has
so
much
more
potential
My
Hope
Is
that
with
the
mayor's
budget
that
we're
able
to
kind
of
challenge
the
status
quo,
you're,
making
sure
we
have
a
balanced
budget,
we're
doing
things
fiscally
responsibly.
But
how
do
we
try
different
things
and
other
cities
around
the
country
that
have
changed
have
really
embraced
Pilots,
it's
something
that
really
helped
them
kind
of
turn
corners
and
I'm,
hoping
that's
something
that
you'll
see
in
the
budget
and
that's
where
we're
supportive
of
it.
Thank
you.
Z
Thank
you,
mayor
Mayhem,
vice
mayor
kame
and
Pam
Foley,
for
putting
together
a
plan
that
puts
substantial
dollars
into
both
Immediate
Solutions,
like
interim
housing
and
long-term
long-term,
affordable
housing.
The
other
plan
from
Davis
and
Ortiz
and
Torres
is
status
quo.
It
won't
provide
the
changes
we
need
in
San
Jose.
We
learned
a
lot
during
the
pandemic.
We
know
that
interim
housing
works
as
we
learn.
We
change
that's
why
Hotel
purchases
were
added
commercial
space
was
removed
and
spending
was
shifted
in
the
past.
Z
That's
what
responsible
government
does
and
responsible
oversight
would
require
a
two-third
vote
to
keep
measure
e,
as
is
not
only
to
change
it.
It's
a
disservice
to
the
voters
and,
more
importantly,
the
people
suffering
on
the
streets
to
let
a
few
council
members
control
the
process
when
the
intent
was
to
have
oversight
to
avoid
this
exact
situation,
please
vote
Yes
to
mayor's
budget
proposal
and
let's
give
people
hope
and
a
chance
for
a
dignified
life.
Thank
you.
Thank.
AA
AB
My
opinion
is
that
the
interim
housing
is
is
dignified
houses
for
the
homeless.
AA
AB
AA
AA
AC
My
name
is
Janiece
Conde
good
afternoon
council
members
I
want
to
let
you
know
that
I
support
the
mayor's
proposed
budget,
100
percent
I'm,
pretty
sure
we
elected
mayor
Mahan,
because
we
wanted
change
and
some
of
the
same
things
that
he
envisioned
he's
working
hard
for
some
big
changes
and
it
seems
he's
swimming
a
bit
Upstream.
My
hope
today
is
that
we
are
all
a
part
of
that
change
and
support
his
proposed
budget.
We
elected
him
to
be
our
leader.
AC
AC
AD
Hi,
thank
you.
My
name
is
King
surrender.
Car
Dollywood
I've
been
a
resident
of
San
Jose,
since
1986.
I
want
to
reiterate
what
I
spoke.
Last
night
I
hear
Sacred
Heart
mentioned
for
many
of
the
supporters
for
Davis
Taurus
and
Ortiz's
memo
the
words
Jesus
Christ
repeatedly
left
out
when
mentioning
Sacred
Heart.
AD
There
is
obvious
religious
influence
and
therefore
bias
in
David,
Ortiz
and
Teresa
torres's
memo
the
same
people
who
created
this
housing
Mental
Health
crisis
cannot
honestly
know
how
to
fix
it,
give
guilt
and
shame
to
others
and
then
be
their
saviors.
This
has
been
on
repeat
for
too
long
in
the
United
States
mayor
mayor
Mahan
is
a
conscious
person
who
thinks
of
solutions
to
problems
and
plans
for
the
future
of
his
constituents
without
bias,
I
fully
support
in
him
and
Trust
in
his
leadership.
Thank
you.
AE
AF
Good
afternoon
Mr,
mayor
and
Pam
Foley
we'll
see
each
other
all
the
time.
I
am
for
the
interim
housing
and
I'm
going
to
tell
you
why,
because
I
have
been
in
the
shoes
of
these
people
that
are
homeless,
I'm
an
immigrant
came
to
the
US
in
1986.,
went
to
school,
got
a
degree
in
engineering
right
down.
AF
So
I
was
trying
to
look
for
work.
Just
so,
I
can
get
back
on
track
and
they
would
they
wouldn't.
Let
me
do
anything
see
they.
They
had
hours
where
you
could
just
sit
there
and
talk
about
your
feelings,
and
how
are
you
doing
today
versus
looking
for
a
job
and
I
saw
these
kids
that
have
been
there
for
two
three
four
years,
but
thank.
AG
AG
I'm
here
to
support
the
budget
proposed
by
council
member
Foley
vice
mayor
kamay,
as
well
as
mayor,
Mayhem,
interim
Housing
Works,
and
is
far
more
dignified
than
leaving
people
to
live
and
die
in
tents
across
the
city.
We
have
a
responsibility
to
act
with
urgency
to
address
this
greatest
human
suffering
in
our
community
and
we
all
benefit
when
people
are
indoors
faster.
AG
AH
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
Sam
home
vice
president
of
District
9
leadership
group,
as
well
as
the
Thousand
Oaks
neighborhood
resident
Association
I'm
here
as
a
resident
sharing.
Speaking
with
you
and
I,
want
to
begin
by
thanking
all
of
the
council
members
because
I
know
most,
if
not
all
of
you
I
have
great
appreciation.
As
Community
member
I
love,
you
I
respect
you
for
what
you
do
and
your
efforts
in
addressing
the
issue
of
homelessness
and
safety
and
blight
in
our
city
as
a
community.
AH
We
come
together
to
do
this
and
six
years
ago,
19
2017
I
stood
right.
Here
spoke
about
the
950
million
dollar
measure
a
when
we
passed
that
and
I
say
that
if
we
divided
950
million
into
100
into
7
000
residents
homeless
people
in
our
County,
we
would
have
135
000
for
each
of
the
homeless
people.
We
would
have
addressed
a
lot
of
issues
there.
Today.
AH
We
don't
have
that
much
money,
we're
looking
at
over
100
million
dollars
and
address
the
affordable,
housing
and
interim
important,
less
Focus,
getting
them
out
of
the
the
encampment.
AI
My
name
is
Jackie
Rivera
I'm,
the
operations
co-director
with
South
Bay
Community
Land
Trust,
the
first
and
only
Land
Trust
in
San
Jose,
again
I've
been
hearing
a
lot
of
folks
wanting
to
change
the
status
quo
again,
I
encourage
you
looking
to
decommodifying
land
and
Housing
Community
Land
Trust
our
transformative
strategy
to
take
land
off
of
the
speculative
market
and
put
it
into
Community
use
like
housing,
Collective
ownership
and
other
resident-led
opportunities.
AI
That
puts
you
know
not
only
permanently
affordable,
deed,
restricted
units,
but
again
other
community
uses
I'm
here
in
support
of
the
council
member
Davis,
Torres
and
Ortiz
memo.
It
is
also
the
only
memo
that
supports
preservation.
Preservation
is
a
strategy
that
can
also
help
us
with
anti-displacement
and
again,
very
innovative
solutions
and
opportunities
for
Resident
land
and
old
properties.
AI
C
AJ
Thank
you,
hello.
My
name
is
Alfredo
Villa
Senor
and
I
from
District
Five,
Mr,
Ortiz
and
I
know
that
everybody
everybody
wants
permanent
housing
for
all.
Okay,
personally
I,
don't
feel
it
would
be
achieved
in
my
lifetime.
There's
not
enough
resources
or
time
to
do
that,
but
we
can
all
work
for
that.
Here
are
the
main
issues.
Should
we
place
most
of
the
limited
funding
to
build
a
low-income
housing
that
we
owe
what?
AJ
But
it
takes
five
years
to
build,
or
we
can
do
both
by
funding
some
future,
affordable
housing
and,
most
importantly,
assessing
thousands
of
families
that
we
that
are
at
risk
dying
on
the
streets
now
I
say
we
do
both
by
doing
a
decent,
temporary
housing
for
all
that
we
can
do.
Thank
you
all
council
members.
Let
us
both
do
what's
best
for
all.
Thank
you.
AK
AL
Hi,
my
name
is
Jen
Meyer
I'm,
a
D3
voter
union
worker
and
member
for
showing
up
for
racial
Justice
here
in
solidarity
with
SOS,
I'm
thinking
about
common
sense
and
the
common
good,
and
what
we
have
in
common.
It's
common
in
San
Jose
to
live
paycheck
to
paycheck,
it's
common
in
San
Jose,
whether
Tech
worker
food
service
worker,
whether
nurse
or
sanitation
worker,
whether
engineer
daycare
worker,
it's
common,
no
matter
who
you
are
to
spend
half
your
income
on
housing,
it's
common
sense
to
preserve
measure
e
to
preserve
the
pipeline
of
permanent,
affordable
housing.
AL
An
ounce
of
prevention
is
worth
a
pound
of
cure.
It's
common
sense
to
use
the
ending
funds
balance
to
also
Fund
emergency
shelter.
I
am
saying
this
support
the
Davis,
Taurus
and
Ortiz
proposal.
Please
to
preserve
measure
e.
It
is
a
both
and
win-win
solution.
That
is
just
plain
common
sense,
and
rather
than
sweeping
people
who
are
struggling
to
make
ends
meet
under
the
rug.
It
reminds
us
that
affordable
housing
for
all
is
part
of
the
common
good.
Thank
you.
AM
AM
And
City
Council
Members,
my
name
is
Jason
Daniel
I'm,
a
resident
of
District
8
for
the
last
45
years
and
I
do
support
mayor
mahan's
budget
plan.
It
is,
it
is
important
to
have
permanent,
affordable
housing,
but
it's
even
more
important
to
have
interim
housing
for
those
that
are
unhoused
Industries
at
this
time
and
because
of
their
safety
I
think
all
citizens
deserve
to
have
a
roof
on
their
head,
but
for
their
safety.
So
I
support
and
I
urge
all
council
member
to
say
yes
to
the
mayor's
body
fat.
Thank
you.
AN
Hello,
my
name
is
Dasha
Leeds
I'm,
the
conservation
organizer
for
the
Sierra
Club
Lumber
Prieta
chapter
and
a
district
one
resident.
We
in
the
climate
activist
Community
were
alarmed
to
see
the
budget
cuts
to
climate,
smart
funding
contained
in
the
manager's
budget
addendum
or
MBA
21,
slashing
one-time
climate,
smart
non-personnel
funding
in
half
by
two
hundred
thousand
dollars.
AN
Now,
as
far
as
I
understand
it,
the
climate
Cuts
in
MBA
21
are
currently
not
a
part
of
the
budget,
and
none
of
the
council
members
offer
today,
as
far
as
I
have
seen
have
requested
that
the
climate
Cuts
specifically
be
included
so
I'll
end
by
saying
thank
you
for
not
including
these
budget
cuts
in
your
memos,
and
we
sincerely
hope
that
you
keep
it
this
way
in
today's
vote.
Community
engagement
and
technical
assistance
are
essential.
Thank
you.
C
AO
Thank
you,
postal
from
the
Horseshoe
I'd
like
to
thank
a
vice
mayor
command
for
getting
this
proposal
back
on
track
and
more
consistent
with
the
intention
of
the
voters.
AO
I
also
would
like
to
state
that
it
concerns
me
that
the
the
mayor's
judgment
was
that
far
off,
that
it
was
that
inconsistent
with
what
it
is
that
we
actually
needed
to
do.
That
concerns
me
because
of
his
judgment.
Is
that
inconsistent
with
what
it
is
that
the
people
need,
then
how
many
other
decisions
is
he
making?
That
needs
to
be
recalibrated
to
that
degree,
and
that's
a
concern
of
mine
I
mean
I'm
beholden
to
his
decisions
and
I
think
they're
questionable.
Thank
you.
AP
Can
you
hear
me
yes,
okay,
just
my
my
name
is
Sir
Jason
Baines
I'm,
the
long-term
resident
of
District,
8.
I'm,
a
businessman
and
my
family.
Other
members
are
businessmen
and
due
to
this
homeless
encampment,
it
has
adversely
affected
on
most
of
our
business.
I
I
know,
mayor
Matt
budget
is
the
most
effective
proposal
at
this
time
sooner.
The
homeless
people
are
out
of
the
street,
they
can
settle
in
their
lives
and
we
should
all
support
this
budget.
Thank
you.
C
Moira
Meriwether
and
Then
followed
in
person
I'm
going
to
call
several
names
in
person,
so
Ann
Webb,
Alex,
Ortega,
Daniel,
Ortega,
Ricardo,
Rios
and
Don
talk
lartigue.
So
all
of
you
come
on
down
and
you'll
whoever's
at
the
mic
will
speak
as
soon
as
moira's
completed
Myra
go
ahead.
AQ
Thank
you,
I'm
Maria,
Meriweather
I'm,
a
resident
of
District
Seven
I,
still
lived
here
for
over
30
years,
I'm.
Also
a
member
of
mothers
out
front
Silicon
Valley
and
the
Silicon
Valley
Bicycle
Coalition,
I'm
speaking
on
two
items
of
importance
in
the
budget.
First
I
would
like
to
ask
that
you
do
not
reduce
the
budget
for
climate
smart,
as
was
proposed
from
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
non-personnel
expenses.
AQ
Please
do
allocate
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
climate,
smart
non-personnel
expenses.
Secondly,
please
do
not
approve
the
budget
proposed
with
extremely
inadequate
funding
for
implementing
Vision
zero
safety
modifications.
Please
do
fully
fund
Vision
zero
implementation
for
safer
streets.
Both
of
these
are
very
important
and
essential,
and
they
need
to
be
prioritized.
Thank
you.
AR
Ms
Ann
Webb
I'm,
a
resident
of
District,
Two
and
I'm
here
to
speak
strongly
in
support
of
the
plan
foot
forward
by
mayor
Mann
vice
mayor
Rosemary
committee
and
counselor
Pam
Foley
I
have
lived
in
San
Jose
since
1978
in
districts.
Two
one
and
three,
as
you
can
imagine
from
my
accent,
San
Jose,
is
my
adopted.
City
Buddhism
I
am
passionate
about
the
plan
of
erecting
quick,
build
houses
to
reduce
homelessness
and
increasing
our
police
force
is
a
reasonable
one
and
one
that
we
should
all
support.
AR
AS
Hello
good
afternoon,
please
excuse
my
passion
from
last
night
I'm
here
representing
the
vendors
at
the
Prius
flea
market.
I
just
want
to
say
that
we
want
the
council
to
please
support
the
vendors
transition
funds
that
we
are
needing
funds
to
to
create
creating
jobs
for
the
people
of
San
Jose,
to
keep
people
in
homes
to
give
people
an
outlet
for
a
source
of
income
to
help
the
problem
that
we're
facing
right
now
with
homelessness
to
help
people
pay
their
bills.
AS
The
city
of
San
Jose,
the
barriers
of
flea
market
has
been
very,
has
been
very
involved
in
growing
this
city
of
what
it
is
today
and
we
ask
for
the
help.
There's
500
vendors
in
needs
and
owners
of
those
spaces,
but
hundreds
of
other
employees
that
work
for
them.
We
create
jobs,
and
we
sincerely
hope
that
you
guys
take
this
into
consideration.
AS
AT
Hello,
my
name
is
Daniel
Ortega
I
also
represent
the
500
vendors
at
the
Berryessa
Flea
Market
I
want
to
say
thank
you
guys
for
having
us
and
if
you
guys
could
also
look
into
it,
please,
with
the
funds
we're
in
need,
I'm,
also
a
business
owner
here
in
San,
Jose,
I'm,
second
generation
I
grew
up
the
barriest
of
flea
markets
in
my
second
home
thank
God
thanks
to
my
family,
for
their
hard
work
and
thanks
to
the
Bone
family
over
at
the
Barrister
flea
market,
I
had
a
good
childhood.
I
grew
up.
AT
You
know
my
parents,
hard
workers
and
that's
all
I
know
is
that
there's
a
flea
market
and
thank
you
guys
so
much
and
we
hope
to
hear
if
you
guys
can
help
us
out
with
the
funds
and
to
relocate
us
to
a
new
home.
Thank
you.
AU
Hello,
my
name
is
Ricardo
Rios
me
and
my
family
have
been
at
the
theater
Market
more
than
34
years
I'm
second
generation
owned
I'm,
taking
over
my
dad's
business
at
the
flea
market
and
I,
would
like
the
city
of
San
Jose
to
look
for
a
location
for
all
the
vendors
at
the
flea
market.
I
know
there's
going
to
be
a
five
acre,
Urban
Market,
but
that's
not
capable
of
all
the
500
vendors.
AU
We
would
like
the
city
to
find
us
a
land
that
is
of
at
least
you
know:
60
Acres
for
all
the
500
vendors
to
be
United
together
and
not
separated
into
different
locations
and
that'll,
be
all
just
for
the
city
to
help
us
out
for
the
flea
market
to
continue
all
right.
Thank
you.
AV
Hello,
council,
members
and
mayor,
my
name
is
Dante
lartik
I
grew
up
in
Seven
Trees
running
non-profit
that
serves
transition,
age,
youth
called
raising
the
bar
a
lot
of
young
people
coming
out
of
systems.
Just
don't
have
the
resources
essentially
to
find
housing
on
their
own,
so
permanent,
Supportive
Housing
is
super
important
right,
I've
been
in
subsidized
housing
for
11
years.
Why?
Because
systems
failed
me
the
issue
that
we're
facing
right
now?
Isn't
that
we're
not
building
housing,
we're
not
housing
people
if
you're
part
of
this
system-
and
you
work
in
this
system.
AV
You
understand
that
we're
housing
a
lot
of
people.
The
problem
is
social
economic
Mobility.
The
problem
is
we're
not
investing
in
the
people
that
call
San
Jose
their
home
that
were
born
here
in
this
city
and
they
can't
afford
to
live
here.
Okay.
So
if
we
stop
investing
in
permanent
Supportive
Housing
and
try
to
divert
funds
into
interim
housing,
we're
going
to
run
into
big
problems,
invest
in
people
invest
in
careers,
invest
in
economic
Mobility.
If
you
really
do
want
to
solve
some
of
the
issues
that
we're
having
right
now,.
AW
Hi,
my
name
is
Trent
and
I
am
a
community
organizer
at
Sacred
Heart,
Community,
Service
I'm
speaking
in
favor
of
the
Davis
Taurus
and
Ortiz
plan
for
measure
e
funds.
One
critical
issue
that
has
plagued
our
community
is
the
lack
of
affordable
housing.
Many
of
our
fellow
residents
are
forced
to
leave
San
Jose
and
far
too
many
find
themselves
Without
Shelter
living
on
the
streets.
AW
Measure
e
is
a
plan
that
holds
true
to
the
promises
we
made
to
the
voters,
ensuring
that
funds
allocated
for
this
purpose
are
used
to
their
fullest
potential
measure
e
investors
in
our
community's
well-being,
affordable
housing
has
a
positive
ripple
effect
that
extends
beyond
the
individuals
directly
impacted.
Thank.
AX
Mayor
Mayhem
and
council
members,
my
name
is
Thomas
Knight
and
I
am
a
member
of
the
lived
experience,
Advisory
Board
of
Silicon
Valley.
It
is
crucial
to
recognize
that
most
of
the
endorsements
for
the
mayor's
plan
come
from
individuals
who
are
securely
housed.
They
often
refer
to
the
homeless
as
these
people
speculating
on
their
needs.
The
voices
of
individuals
with
lived
experience
of
homelessness
and
those
who
serve
them
are
predominantly
opposing
the
mayor's
plan.
AX
They
are
the
voices
of
authentic
experience
and
their
insights
are
invaluable
in
crafting
solutions
that
truly
meet
the
needs
of
the
homeless.
If
we
truly
care
about
the
desires
and
needs
of
these
people,
let's
not
dismiss
the
voices
and
lived
experiences
of
those
directly
affected
by
homelessness.
We
owe
them
our
attention
and
our
action
adopt
The
Memo
from
Council,
Members,
Davis,
Ortiz
and
Torres.
Thank
you
very
much.
AY
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
Mila
bakala,
a
San
Jose
District
3
student
and
a
member
of
San
Jose
youth
climate
action
I'm
here
to
ask
that
you
do
not
Implement
MBA
number
21,
which
would
reduce
the
climate
smart
budget
at
today's
meeting.
Our
city
budget
should
be
a
sensible
reflection
of
the
needs
of
our
city.
Disregarding
climate
change
won't
make
this
issue
disappear.
It
will
make
it
worse
and
leave
San
Jose
behind
the
rest
of
the
world
when
further
natural
disasters
Force
us
to
make
sudden
and
expensive
overhauls
in
the
years
ahead.
AY
AZ
AZ
My
10
month
old,
Amelia
apologies
if
she
interrupts
I've,
had
the
privilege
of
speaking
yesterday
during
the
public
hearing
I'm
grateful
to
have
another
opportunity
today
simply
to
lift
up
a
memo
that
was
issued
today
by
council
member
Torres,
calling
for
a
study
session
on
Arts
funding
in
San.
Jose
I
really
think
you
should
pursue
this
as
part
of
the
budget
motion,
whatever
it
has
today.
AZ
So
we
can
have
a
thorough
conversation
about
this
issue
prior
to
next
year's
budget
sessions,
so
that
we're
not
running
around
like
chickens
with
our
heads
cut
off
with
our
hair
on
fire.
Having.
BA
Hello
good
afternoon
and
thank
you,
council
members
for
all
you
do
for
our
community
I'm
Steve
Eckert
CEO
of
Alum
Rock
Counseling,
Center
I've
been
working
with
children,
youth
and
families
for
43
years
now,
Alum
Rock,
counseling
centers
receives
best
funding
to
provide
mentoring
and
chronic
absenteeism,
intervention
and
prevention.
While
we
appreciate
the
support
and
provide
provided
by
the
city
of
San
Jose
to
best
providers,
the
demand
for
our
programs
is
much
more
than
funded
the
capacity,
the
funded
capacity.
BA
M
It
is
also
fiscally
irresponsible
to
correct
funding,
as
the
research
is
clear
from
both
economists
and
climatologists
that
the
financial
impact
of
under-mitigated
climate
change
would
be
far
larger
than
effective
climate
action,
don't
say
someone
else
will
fix
this.
For
us,
San
Jose
is
the
capital
of
Silicon
Valley
and
an
epicenter
of
innovation.
Only
we
can
solve
our
problems
and
we
must
be
leaders
in
this
effort.
Please
preserve
climate.
BB
Hello
I
was
there
until
after
11
pm
last
night
and
listened
to
every
speaker
with
respect
and
compassion.
My
concerns
as
a
San
Jose
business
owner,
homeowner
and
parent
are
the
same
as
theirs.
I
do
not
take
the
approach
of
being
on
one
side
or
the
other.
I
have
the
same
amount
of
compassion
for
the
homeless
population.
As
for
the
business
owners,
barely
surviving
the
citizens
go
to
have
their
homes
and
cars
broken
into
and
all
the
taxpayers
who
have
lost
their
Parks
trails
and
Creeks.
The
quality
of
life
has
diminished
for
everyone.
BB
Homelessness
is
a
global
issue,
but
some
countries
have
tackled
the
problem
successfully.
The
common
denominator,
among
the
best,
is
the
priority
of
housing.
Getting
people
off
the
streets.
I
support
mayor
mayhem's
proposal.
I
want
to
see
as
many
homeless
people
as
possible
out
from
under
bridges.
The
parks
The
Creeks
the
street,
with
the
services
being
provided.
I
want
to
see
the
attitude
of
a
hands
up
instead
of
a
Perpetual
hands
out.
I
grew
up
quite
poor,
but
learned
to
be
self-reliant
and
hold
myself
accountable
for
all
things:
a
hot
meal
and
a
hygiene.
BC
Hello,
my
name
is
Araceli
Gutierrez
and
I
am
here
in
Japan
of
survivors
of
the
streets.
I
urge
you
to
support
the
Davis,
Taurus
and
Ortiz
plan
the
only
plan
to
make
sense
and
makes
the
most
of
the
investment
in
affordable
housing,
take
the
funds
for
emergency
interim
housing
from
the
inflated
police
budget
and
maintain
the
majority
allocations.
Thank
you.
BD
Good
afternoon,
mayor
Mahan
and
city
council,
my
name
is
Chris
Durkin
with
Sacred
Heart,
Community
Service,
and
also
one
of
your
neighbors
to
the
north
on
the
Redwood
City
Council,
but
I'm
speaking
strictly
as
an
individual.
Today,
I
stand
with
survivors
of
the
streets
and
urge
you
to
support
the
Davis
Ortiz
plan
for
measure
e.
BD
The
housing
crisis
did
not
stop
at
city
or
county
lines,
and
we
can
only
solve
this
issue
if
we
work
together
and
that
means
preserving
critical,
affordable
housing
funding,
not
to
mention
it
will
help
you
with
your
Arena
goals,
in
the
spirit
of
Intercity
cooperation.
I
respectfully
encourage
you
to
preserve
measure
e
funding
and
I
look
forward
to
working
more
closely
with
you
to
address
our
mutual
issues
going
forward.
Please
support
the
Davis
Ortiz
Taurus
plan.
Thank
you.
BE
This
plan
find
funds
in
the
city
budget
for
interim
housing
and
homeless,
Support
Services,
while
maintaining
previous
measure
e-funds
at
locations.
We
all
realize
the
need
to
provide
a
temporary
shelter
for
individuals
seeking
housing,
and
this
is
a
plan
that
helps
to
meet
the
need
and
the
best
in
permanent,
affordable
housing
solutions
for
them
to
get
the
help
they
need
and
keep
them
housed.
BE
C
By
Jeffrey
under
we're
cutting
public
comments
off
at
three,
so
we
have
eight
minutes,
Olivia
good.
BF
Evening
my
name
is
Olivia.
Ortiz
I
am
here
to
ask
you
to
support
the
memo
from
council
member
Davis,
Ortiz
and
Torres
on
measure
e
for
permanent,
affordable
housing.
These
plan
keeps
the
promise
made
to
borders
for
missionary
funds.
Measuring
funds
should
be
used
to
create
and
preserve
affordable
housing.
We
need
to
invest
in
permanent
Solutions.
This
plan
also
finds
funding
in
the
city's
budget
for
interim
and
homeless
Support
Services,
while
maintaining
previous
missionary
funds
on
location.
BF
BG
Mayor
council,
Jeffrey
Buchanan
with
working
Partnerships
USA
on
behalf
of
our
organization
and
our
colleagues
with
the
South
Bay
labor
Council,
and
the
Building
Trades
Council
really
want
to.
Thank
you
all
for
the
incredible
thoughtfulness.
That's
gone
into
this
process.
BG
You
know
I
think
we're
all
trying
to
figure
out
how
do
we
balance
the
long
term
and
the
short-term
goals
of
the
city?
After
reviewing
the
memos
submitted
by
council
members,
we've
encourage
this
Council
to
pass
a
June
message
message
and
operating
budget
which
adopts
the
Davis,
Ortiz
and
Torres
memo
and
then
looks
to
also
directed
either
directing
staff
or
identifying
additional
funds
to
support
the
additional
Staffing
and
interim
shelter
needs
identified
by
council
members,
Cohen
and
Jimenez.
BG
Lastly,
I
would
encourage
you
to
support
the
proposal
from
Council
Members
Davis
Ortiz,
Torres,
batra,
Doan
and
Candelas
around
not
accepting
the
reduction
in
Med
30
recommended
by
staff
and
to
fund
some
of
the
positions
identified
in
these
memos
through
use
of
the
future.
BH
Yeah
hello
good
afternoon,
mayor
and
Council.
One
thing
that
I
that
I
hear
is
encourage
everybody
to
go
and
read
the
proposition
or
measure
e
again
as
as
I
read
it
on
the
county
clerk's
website,
measure
e
was
intended
to
be
used
for
transitional
housing
and
supportive
services
to
to
help
deal
with
the
homeless
and
well.
The
initial
allocation
skews
things
towards
permanent
housing,
I
think
there's
a
a
group
of
chronically
homeless
people
that
are
not
being
served
at
all.
They
have
no
representation.
BI
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
Danica
Kubota
I'm,
an
incoming
College,
freshman
district,
6
resident
and
co-lead
of
the
San
Jose
climate
action
team.
I
strongly
ask
that
you
do
not
incorporate
MBA
21
into
the
city's
budget,
which
would
decrease
the
city's
smart
budget
by
200
000.
The
funding
that
would
be
removed
would
make
it
much
more
difficult
to
ideate
and
execute
impactful
effective
climate
policy
as
a
large
city
in
the
heart
of
Silicon
Valley
and
the
long
time
agent
of
climate
action,
San
Jose
has
the
power
to
affect
large-scale
change.
BI
We
are
a
model
for
cities
across
our
state.
Our
nation
in
the
world
and
cutting
the
climate
smart
budget
would
not
only
erase
the
positive
change
that
we've
made
in
the
form
of
restored
habitats
and
increased
biodiversity,
but
also
increase
the
negative
impacts
of
climate
change,
without
as
many
resources
to
counteract
them,
time
is
running
out.
We
as
a
society
need
to
take
direct
action
against
climate
change
and
reducing
the
client
budget
now
would
be
quite
the
opposite.
It
would
harm
our
communities
more
than
it
would
help
them.
We
cannot
remain
idle.
BI
C
BJ
Good
evening,
Council
or
good
afternoon,
my
name
is
Juan
Angel
and
I
asked
you
to
support
the
memo
from
Council
Members,
Davis,
Ortiz
and
Torres
on
measury
for
permanent,
affordable
housing.
This
plan
finds
funding
in
the
city
budget
for
interim
housing
and
homelessness,
Support
Services,
while
maintaining
previous
measury
funding
allocations.
BJ
We
recognize
that
the
need
to
provide
temporary
shelter
for
individuals
seeking
housing
and
this
plan
helps
meet
that
need
and
invest
in
permanent
and
affordable
housing
solutions
for
them
to
go
to
and
I'm,
also
really
wanting
to
ensure
that
there's
a
true
Common
Sense
approach
when
dealing
with
those
overall
Services
needed
to
provide
permanent
housing
for
our
homeless
community
members,
so
vote
on
the
correct
plan,
which
is
the
Davis
tourism
Ortiz
memo.
Thank
you.
BK
Hi
there,
my
name
is
Alvera
Faria
I'm
at
District,
2,
Resident
and
Community
leader
I'm,
asking
Council
to
vote
today,
no
on
the
mayor's
June
9th
memo
with
regards
to
measure
e
as
it
breaks
the
city's
promise
to
voters.
Eih
is
an
important
tool
for
temporarily
housing
people,
but
without
increasing
permanent,
affordable
housing.
The
success
rate
of
moving
residents
into
permanent
housing
is
severely
compromised.
Rue
Ferrari
eih
residents
are
terrified
because
they
cannot
find
homes
after
six
months
and
they
will
have
to
return
to
the
streets
right
now.
BK
The
city
spends
about
17
and
a
half
million
annually
on
its
six
existing
interim
housing
sites
in
comparison,
affordable
housing
does
not
have
an
ongoing
cost
component.
Redirecting
measure
e-funds
could
impact
the
County's
ability
to
leverage
state
and
federal
dollars
which
would
pause
some
developments.
In
the
long
run,
it
costs
less
to
build,
affordable
housing
than
operate
and
maintain
tiny
homes
that
are
not
permanent
Solutions.
Please
do
not
alter
the
allocation.
C
BL
Hi
good
afternoon
my
name
is
Maria
Martinez
I
am
president
District
Five
and
also
a
staff
at
Summers,
Mayfair
and
Family
Resource
Center,
and
ask
you
to
support
the
memo
from
council
member
Davis,
Ortiz
and
Torres
and
Mr
E
for
permanent,
affordable
housing
as
a
working
and
the
family
resources,
and
then
I
hear
a
lot
of
story
for
the
family.
They
struggle
in
the
housing.
BL
BM
Hi
mayor
and
Council,
thank
you
very
much.
I
know
you
guys
have
a
lot
of
difficult
decisions
to
make
today.
BM
BM
It's
a
five-year
process,
even
with
Expedition,
but
the
other
thing
is
I
want
to
you
know,
also
let
you
know
it's
very
important
that
as
we
get
people
out
of
the
homeless
encampments
and
into
Supportive
Housing
that
we
have
their
animals
go
with
them,
and
that
means
that
they
need
to
be
spayed,
neutered
and
vaccinated.
According
to
those
regulations,
please
support
the
shelter
funding
and
TNR
programs.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
Tony,
okay,
we're
back
just
before
we
jump
in
two
points
number
one.
There
were
a
few
public
comments
about
the
climate,
smart
plan
and
that's
NBA,
21
I,
just
want
to
make
sure
everyone
is,
is
clear:
NBA
21
was
was
put
out
by
the
budget
office
to
create
a
menu
of
potential
trade-offs.
B
The
council
could
make,
should
a
member
of
the
council
put
forward
a
spending
proposal
that
didn't
have
that
wasn't
funded
and
there
would
be
some
discussion
of
what
trade-offs
we
could
make
so
that
memo
is
not
a
proposal
to
cut
the
things
in
that
list.
That
is
a
menu
of
options
for
the
council.
Should
someone
want
to
identify
something
that
the
administration
feels
whether
or
not
advocating
should
be
cut
is
something
that
could
be
accounted
for
and
here's
how
much
it
would
cost
so
that
people
would
have
a
menu
of
options.
B
But
there
is
no
proposal
in
the
current
June
message
or
the
city
manager's
proposed
operating
budget
to
cut
the
things
on
that
list.
I
just
want
to
be
extra
careful
because
I
think
a
few
people
who
saw
that
MBA
got
very
worried
that
there
was
a
proposal
to
cut
the
things
on
the
list,
which
is
not
the
case.
B
Second
I
know
that
the
budget
office
Jim
Shannon
Jim,
you
and
your
team
have
put
together
some
tape,
some
charts
and
tables
here
to
make
sure
we
are
all
starting
from
the
same
same
understanding
of
the
numbers.
Do
you
want
to
before
we
dive
into
conversation
just
kick
off
with
or
give
us
the
kind
of
walkthrough
of
the
data.
BN
Yeah
mayor
that
wouldn't
be
great.
If
that
works
for
that's,
you
all
I,
think
it's
a
good
starting
point,
great
great!
Thank
you!
So
much
and
good
afternoon,
mayor
and
Council
again,
my
name
is
Jim
Shannon,
the
city's
budget
director
I'm
here
again
just
to
because
this
was
an
item
for
both
the
measure
e
reallocation
and
the
June
budget
message
just
to
show
basically
on
a
couple
of
slide
decks
the
different
options
for
the
measure
e-reallocations
out
there.
BN
It's
a
little
bit
of
a
recombination
of
the
memorandum
that
was
released
on
Friday,
took
a
sort
of
consolidate
all
the
plans
and
again,
as
the
mayor
said
earlier,
sort
of
another
way
to
look
at
the
numbers
here
is.
Hopefully
this
is
helpful
for
the
conversation,
and
so
this
first
slide
here
represents
looking
at
the
different
spending
allocation
buckets
that
are
identified
in
city
council
policy
1-818.
Regarding
the
spending
of
measure
e
revenues.
BN
These
are
the
different
buckets
that
the
fund
that
the
revenues
would
be
spent
out
out
of,
and
so
the
total
amount
that
would
be
available
in
23
24
will
be
about
100
137
million,
and
the
numbers
here
reflect
the
different
ways
in
which
the
proposed
operating
budget,
the
June
budget
message,
the
memorandum
from
Council
Members,
Conan
Jimenez,
and
the
memorandum
from
Council,
Members,
Davis,
Torres
and
Ortiz
would
allocate
those
those
funds
so
really
just
a
representation
here
about
the
different
funding
pots
and
there's
an
asterisk
there
for
the
program.
BN
Administration
line
item,
because
it's
kind
of
important
to
the
later
conversation
it
does
include
about
4.3
million
for
about
full-time
positions
for
four
full-time
positions
in
the
housing
department
to
support
the
coordination
of
homeless,
Outreach
Services.
Three
positions
in
the
city
manager's
office
for
enhanced
homeless
data
analysis
policy
work
at
interdepartmental
agency
coordination
to
fund
those
positions
over
a
three-year
period,
so
those
are
to
support
homeless
work
but
because
they're
actually
not
delivering
the
active
Services
they're
there
in
the
program,
Administration
line
item,
which
is
why
you
see
that
long-winded
asterisk
there.
BN
So
we
are
so
the
next
couple
of
sides
you
sort
of
walk
through
at
a
high
level,
some
of
the
the
larger
categories
here,
and
so
here
we
see
the
amounts
that
would
be
available
for
affordable
housing.
Within
These
are
just
measure
e
dollars
only
so
there's
other
dollars
that
are
out
there.
This
is
just
looking
at
measure
e
itself,
and
so
we've
got
again
so
going
from
left
to
right.
We
have
the
proposed
budget
through
the
council
members
Memo
from
Davis,
Torres
and
or
Ortiz.
BN
BN
We
have
the
commercial
space
for
affordable
housing
again
previously
approved
projects,
but
had
some
commercial
space
components
that
weren't
yet
approved,
and
so
those
are
all
consistent
across
a
piece
for
land
acquisition
and
preservation,
which
only
exists
in
the
proposed
budget,
and
then
there
is
a
funding
for
a
new
nofa.
So
the
2021
is
the
old
nofa.
BN
There
will
be
funding
for
a
new
nofa
Under,
the
three
plans
that
are
not
in
the
proposed
budget,
so
that
you
message:
Cohen,
Jimenez
and
Davis,
Torres
and
or
Ortiz
split
between
extremely
low
and
low
and
moderate
income.
So
you
can
see
the
different
levels
of
affordable
housing
investment
across
all
those
different
allocations,
and
then
here
is
a
representation
of
those
Investments
to
reduce
unsheltered
homelessness.
So
there's
kind
of
too
many
here
to
really
sort
of
go
through
all
of
of
these.
BN
But
what
I
do
include
on
here
is
those
program
Administration
piece
at
the
very
the
bottom
bottom:
two
rows
there
for
homeless
response,
Staffing
and
CMO
coordination
team
as
those
do
support
the
homeless
work
efforts,
so
you
can
see
how
the
dollars
are
are
spread
across
the
the
four
different
plans.
BN
I
think
you
know
one
of
the
the
the
things
that
is
common
amongst
the
other
plans,
not
the
post
budget
is
the
use
of
the
intended
use
of
future
ending
fund
balance
that
may
become
available
as
part
of
the
annual
report
process
over
the
next
two
years.
So
all
three
of
those
plans
direct
the
administration
to
prioritize
any
additional
available,
ending
fund
balance
in
the
in
the
general
fund
to
support
this.
BN
This
work
here
so
that
green
would
be
added
then
to
the
the
totals
that
are
bolded
in
in
black
there,
and
so
that's
again.
This
is
more
of
a
reference
for
your
future
conversation,
probably
not
enough
time
to
sort
of
go
through
each
each
line,
but
just
to
make
sure
that
you're
aware
that
it's
that
it's
there
and
then
we
have
the
other
allocations
here
that
weren't
referenced.
Previously
we've
got
the
line
item
essentially
for
homelessness
prevention,
which
the
proposed
budget
had
double
the
base
allocation
from
4.8
million
to
effectively
9
9.5
million.
BN
The
other
three
plans
go
re
revert
back
to
the
base
allocation
for
the
2324
Revenue
amounts.
We've
got
an
amount
here
for
the
measure
e
Revenue
stabilization
Reserve.
What
this
Reserve
is
intended
to
function,
as
is,
if
measure
e
revenues,
are
lower
in
either
the
current
year
or
the
next
year.
Any
reduction
in
Revenue
then
would
be
offset
by
this
Reserve,
instead
of
impacting
other
potential
other
commitments
that
are
made
elsewhere.
BN
In
the
measure
e
allocations
and
then
we've
got
the
ongoing
program,
Administration
piece,
which
is
2.5
million-
that
represents
the
2324
Revenue,
so
you
take
five
percent
off
of
the
top
of
the
50
million
dollars
for
2324
and
we
fund
ongoing
positions
in
the
base
budget
with
that
Revenue
there
and
at
risk
of
putting
more
numbers
there.
This
is
when
we're
thinking
about
the
amounts
that
will
be
reallocated
from
affordable
housing,
uses
to
homeless
and
other
uses,
which
would
be
again,
which
is
what
triggers
the
the
two-thirds
requirement.
BN
There
is
a
blank
under
the
rows
for
council
members,
Davis,
Torres
and
Ortiz,
because
they're
memorandum
seeks
to
keep
the
existing
allocation
in
city
council
policy
1-18.
So
there
is
no
reallocation
there,
which
is
why
you
see
those
those
rows
blank
there.
There
is,
of
course,
other
funding
for
homelessness
that
we've
talked
about
previously
from
the
existing
allocations,
but
they're
just
blank
here,
just
to
show
that
everything
would
be
according
to
the
existing
allocation.
BN
So
you
have
that
representation
there
and
then
just
talk
a
little
bit
about
what
some
of
the
the
implications
are
of
the
different
plans.
And
this
is
you
know
it's
probably
not
a
perfect
attempt
but
tries
to
get
at
as
sort
of
what
some
of
the
discussion
has
been,
because
I
think
that
certainly
all
the
council
here
and
the
different
plans
are
seeking
to
address
the
issue
of
unsheltered
homelessness
and
there's
a
balance
with
with
also
the
affordable
housing
needs
and
so
I
think.
BN
What
we
want
to
show
here
is
some
of
the
key
work
objectives
and
work
efforts
that
the
council
wants
the
the
administration
to
in
engage
in
and
kind
of
talk
about
them
between
levels
of
certainty
and
from
more
certain
to
less
certain
and
the
reason
why
we're
thinking
about
that
way,
because
when
we
start
tapping
the
ending
fund
balance
in
the
general
fund,
we
start
trading
a
funding
source
that
we
know
of
which
is
these
measure
e
revenues
now
for
potential
Revenue
that
may
become
available
later
in
the
ending
fund
balance.
BN
Certainly,
a
viable
option,
there's
just
less
certainty
that
that
funding
will
be
available
at
the
desired
amounts
and
all
also
that
funding
would
then
be
also
become
available
later
in
the
process,
and
so
that
has
implications
about
how
quickly,
maybe
the
administration
could
could
be
moving
to
take
advantage
of
New
Opportunities
Etc
again,
the
goal
is
the
same,
but
the
certainty
to
achieve
those
the
those
goals,
sort
of
moves
from
Authority
on
the
screen
from
darker
darker
green,
essentially
to
a
lighter
green
to
a
a
white
there,
and
one
of
the
things
that
I
will
point
out
what
makes
it
tricky
the
the
staff
that
I
had
mentioned
previously.
BN
So
those
housing
staff
and
the
city
managers
office
staff
become
pretty
important
to
help
especially
drive
a
lot
of
the
policy
work
into
getting
folks
into
the
different
units
to
identify
some
of
the
new
sites.
So
that's
kind
of
critical
Staffing
component
that
becomes
a
little
bit
harder
to
to
get
at
if
they
become
available
later
in
the
budget
cycle.
I
do
want
to
make
a
couple
notes,
though,
when
we
think
about
developing
and
operating
a
thousand
interim
housing
units.
I.
Think,
that's
that's
an
important
figure.
It's
you
know.
BN
We
wrote
a
whole
MBA
on
it
and
it's
it's
really
critical.
So
so
the
direction
that
we
currently
have
in
Prior
Council,
which
has
been
reaffirmed
by
this
council,
is
when
we
bring
when
we
commit
and
that
development
for
a
new
interim
housing
site
starts
when
we
start
the
construction
on
that
site
that
same
memo,
where
we
bring
forward
authorization
of
that
construction,
we
bring
forward
a
recommendation
to
make
that
a
committed
addition
to
the
general
fund
forecast
in
future
years,
such
that.
BN
If
we
don't
see
enough
funding,
that's
out
there
available
from
state
or
federal
other
sources.
The
general
fund
starts
to
make
up
the
the
difference,
and
so
it
is,
you
know,
so
to
call
you
know
what
those
future
ongoing
operation
costs
are
going
to
be,
which
could
be
a
substantial
way,
so
they
could
rise
to
60
million
million
dollars
if
everything
sort
of
gets
built
out.
You
know
those
are
substantial
resources
that
would
become
commitments
of
the
general
fund
on
an
ongoing
basis.
BN
Should
we,
you
know
not
not
be
able
to
find
other
sources
and
surely
there
will
need
to
be
some
component
of
general
fund
mix
in
the
future.
The
question
is
how
much,
but
it
could
be
substantial
and
so
the
certainty
level.
There
is
a
sort
of
a
reflection
of
the
degrees,
but
you
know
there's
always
going
to
be
uncertainty.
R
BN
Process
as
we
move
forward
into
future
future
years,
so
I
just
want
to
want
to
point
that
out
there
again,
but
the
reason
why
it's
sort
of
Darker
in
the
left-hand
side
and
sort
of
light
at
the
end
is
sort
of
having
that
those
funds
in
hand
now
gives
us
a
little
bit
more
certainty.
Go
to
go
ahead
and
develop
those
site
make
sure
we
feel
good
about
the
early
years
of
the
operation
of
those
sites,
and
so
that's
just
a
little
bit
of
the
of
the
treatment.
BN
I
don't
want
to
spend
too
much
time
on
the
trade-offs,
but
just
give
it
an
idea
of
sort
of
how
the
administration
was
thinking
about
these
different
plans
that
are
out
there
and
then
my
last.
My
last
slide
is
super
wonky.
It's
just
the.
There
is
different
resolutions
that
the
city
manager's
office
and
city
attorney's
office
has
put
before
you
to
approve
the
different
measure.
E
allocations,
there's
options
for
a
two-thirds
vote,
there's
options
for
a
majority
vote,
and
so
I
think,
as
you
all
get
into
your
discussion,
make
your
most
things.
BN
B
Great
thanks
Jim
appreciate
the
the
extra
context
and
Analysis
there
I
think
it's
helpful.
Okay,
so
to
council,
discussion
and
we'll
go
to
counselor
Davis.
G
Thank
you
mayor.
First
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
you
Jim
and
Jackie
and
Rachel
and
Lee
and
Jennifer,
and
your
teams
I
know.
We've
all
had
you
running
around
for
the
last
three
weeks
and
as
the
mayor
said,
Jim
you've
been
great
in
creating
spreadsheets
and
helping
us
figure
out
kind
of
what
we're
doing
and
the
different
plans
that
have
you've
laid
out
so
nicely
here
with
with
the
slides
and
the
trade-offs
among
them.
I
I
just
want
to
say
we
have
brown
act
limitation.
G
So
that's
the
memo
that
I
wrote
with
council
members,
Torres
and
Ortiz
and
then
I'm,
not
planning
I,
just
want
to
be
clear,
I'm,
not
planning
to
make
a
motion
this
first
time
around,
because
I
want
to
see
where
everybody
is
and
then
hopefully
we
can
figure
out
how
to
get
to
a
deal
that
we
can
actually
pass
today,
which
I
know
staff
is
very
motivated
to
have
us
do
so
with
that
I'm
going
to
have
some
questions
for
Rachel
and
Jackie.
G
If
you
want
to
come
down,
but
I
did
want
to
ask
I,
don't
know
if
this
is
for
Jim
or
Lee
or
Jennifer
about
the,
so
we
had
to
make
some
hard
choices
in
in
wanting
to
keep
a
majority
vote.
Just
to
be
honest,
it
was
going
to
be
hard
to
get
to
eight,
not
knowing
what,
where
the
votes
were
for
a
large
number
of
people,
and
that
was
why
we
just
moved
things
around
within
the
existing
categories.
So
I
want
to
be
clear
about
that
and
we
made
some
hard
choices
in
doing
that.
G
So
one
of
the
questions
I
do
want
to
ask
is
in
our
memo
we
asked
for
coming
back
with
ending
fund
balance
to
fund
the
positions
that
were
requested
by
both
housing
and
the
CMO
and
Omar.
If
you
want
to
come
down,
please
do
feel
free,
but
I
I
want
to
ask
the
question:
what
are
the
implications
of
putting
those
new
Staffing
into
the
ending
fund,
balance,
allocation
and
Jim?
If
you
want
to
start
and
if
the
rest
of
the
if
Lee
or
somebody
wants
to
chime
in
that
would
be
great
great.
BN
Yes,
thank
you
for
the
question.
Yeah
I'll
I'll,
give
it
a
shot
here,
so
so,
certainly
so
putting
those
positions
in
the
ending
fund
balance.
You
know
one
delays
when
those
positions
will
be
formally
authorized
so
to
authorize
the
FTE.
We
need
to
have
budget,
that's
behind
it
and
so
that
budget
really
wouldn't
become
available
until
the
budget
was
appropriated
by
the
city
council.
So
there's
you
know,
there
are,
of
course,
some
things
knowing
that
it
is
the
intent
to
ultimately
fund
those.
BN
Hopefully
we
would
try
to
do
as
much
Preparatory
work
as
we
could.
You
know
to
get
the
recruitments
ready
and
to
kind
of
you
know,
get
all
that,
but
but
there's
that
can
only
take
us
so
far,
because
we
have
to
make
sure
we
have.
You
know
they
are
indeed
three-year
limitated
positions.
That
would
give
us
a
little
bit
more
of
a
Runway,
and
so
those
positions
are
really
going
to
be
important.
BN
As
you
know,
council
is
you
know
continuing
wanting
to
work
with
the
admination
to
Iden
identify
you
know,
new
ways
to
address
the
unsheltered
homelessness
additional
policy
work.
We
had
talked
some
about
it
up
up
up
there.
We
have
policy
work
related
to
lived
in
vehicles.
We
have
policy
work
related
to
different
in
in
encampment
sites.
The
ability
to
continue
to
develop
the
existing
site,
so
I
know
the
Public
Work
Staffing
is
only
slightly
funded
in
the
memo
that
you
have
and
I
know.
BN
That
was
also
something
that
we
had
talked
about,
so
it
it
limits.
Our
ability
to
really
to
engage
Network
really
puts
a
pause
on
it.
You
know
I
think
for
the
housing
department
staff-
that's
you
know,
Jackie
and
Rachel
can
can
clarify.
If
need,
if
need
be,
that
will
those
staff
really
become
important,
probably
a
little
bit
later
on
in
the
fiscal
year,
as
as
we
need
those
staff
to
manage
some
of
the
enhanced
contractual
services
that
is
provided.
BN
So
if
there
is
in
your
memo,
I
think
there
is
a
3.7
million
for
the
the
contractual
services,
so
that
staff
becomes
pretty
important
for
that
piece
and
help
Place
folks
into
these
new
sites
that
we
want
to
stand
up
or
get
them
into
a
better
sheltered
condition.
So
it's
just
delays
our
ability
to
better
engage
in
that
work.
That's
that's
my
initial
shot.
Okay,.
G
And
then
I
did
want
to
ask
so
when
we
were
making
these
decisions,
we
really
were
talking
about
the
difference
in
outcomes
and
really
wanting
to
to
place
our
the
majority
of
our
money,
where
the
outcomes
are
the
best.
So
I
I
did
want
to
ask
you
Rachel
and
Jackie.
What
are
the
outcomes
for
for
permanent
housing
and
interim
shelter
in
terms
of
keeping
people
permanently
off
the
streets.
BO
So,
in
terms
of
permanent
housing,
we
actually
have
statistics
that
look
over
time
to
see
if
they
remain
housed,
and
so
that
statistic
ranges
annually
anywhere
between
92
to
96
percent
of
the
people
after
one
year
remain
in
permanent
housing
and
what
I
realized
as
I
was
looking
at
the
statistics
that
we've
been
reporting
out
in
interim
housing.
What
we've
been
reporting
out
is
the
exit,
so
where
did
they
go,
but
we
have
not
been
tracking,
as
we
do
in
our
other
system.
BO
Do
people
actually
stay
housed
and
the
the
one
other
point
that
I
wanted
to
make
so
50
percent
moved
into
a
permanent
location
and
of
that
50
percent
78
percent
needed
in
affordable
housing
subsidy
in
order
to
exit
the
site.
So
that
means
they
either
used
rental
assistance
or
they
went
into
a
permanent
Supportive
Housing
Development
or
they
went
into
an
affordable
housing
site.
They
used
a
voucher.
BO
So
it
was
a
full
range
of
affordable
housing
options,
but
they
could
not
overwhelmingly
have
exited
the
system
without
some
support
and
then
29
percent
went
into
an
interim
housing
solution.
But
what
we
don't
know
is
of
that.
29
percent:
what
were
their
outcomes?
Did
they
eventually
get
housed?
Did
they
move
into
another
one?
And
so
that's
some
of
the
additional
work
that
we're
going
to
have
to
really
drill
down
into
so
that
we
can
actually
compare
those
two
statistics,
so
they're
Apples
to
Apples.
G
Thank
you
and
another
key
piece
that
we
we
discussed
and
how
we
got
to
the
the
size
of
a
nofa
that
we
did
was
the
the
piece
for
acquisition
and
Rehab
and
Rachel.
You
and
I
had
a
conversation
about
this
and
I
just
want
to
put
it
out
there
for
everybody
when
we
do
acquisition
and
Rehab,
which
I
think
we
haven't
done,
and
so
we
talked
about
making
that
direction
to
add
it
to
to
the
nofa.
What
income
levels
do
we
need
to
include
for
that.
BP
I,
thank
you.
Rachel
vanderveen
assistant,
director
of
the
housing
department
for
acquisition
rehab.
BP
It's
really
important
to
have
a
wide
range
of
income
levels
because
again,
the
purpose
of
this
is
to
preserve,
preserve,
afford,
naturally
for
occurring,
affordable
housing,
but
also
to
avoid
displacement
right,
and
so
what
what
generally
happens
is
that
there
may
be
one
or
two
residents
that
live
in
that
building
who
actually
have
a
moderate
income,
and
so
what
we
want
to
do
is
ensure
that
they
can
continue
to
live
there
and
they
can
just
pay
a
moderate
income
rent
to
continue
to
live
there
and
then
addition,
and
then
some
of
the
other
rents
can
be
lower.
BP
G
And
that's
just
for
my
colleagues
on
the
council:
that's
why
we
included
all
three
of
the
income
levels
in
in
the
direction
for
the
nofa
to
be
able
to
include
that
for
not
just
acquisition
to
rehab,
but
also
to
get
more
of
a
true
mixed
income.
So
we
hadn't
been,
we
hadn't
been
using
that
in
the
past,
I
see
I
have
exactly
a
minute
and
a
half
left.
So
the
thing,
the
other
thing
that
I
want
to
say
to
give
people
things
to
think
about
is
I.
G
Think
it's
really
important
that
we
send
a
strong
message
that
we
are
and
remain
committed
to
building
new
permanent,
affordable
housing,
and
we
need
that.
We
need
to
send
that
message
to
affordable
housing
developers,
so
they
will
continue
to
identify
and
develop
local
sites.
Even
though
measure
a
funds
have
been
depleted,
we
need
to
send
that
message
to
the
region,
so
they
will
give
our
County
our
do
share
in
any
Regional
measure
that
will
come
forward.
G
That
may
come
forward,
that's
being
discussed
now,
and
perhaps
most
importantly-
and
this
is
the
point
that
I
really
wanted
to
make
last
is
we
need
to
send
that
message
to
our
County
counterparts,
who
are
our
partners
in
the
community
plan
to
end
homelessness
and
there's
a
recommendation
in
there
about
staff
working
together
on
that
and
I
just
want
to
be
clear
with
everyone,
because
I
haven't
been
able
to
talk
to
you
all
and
tell
you
all
this.
G
That
I
have
spoken
with
some
of
our
colleagues
at
the
county
about
our
memo
and
they
need
to
work
more
closely
together
on
both
on
our
roles
and
responsibilities
so
that
we
can
meet
the
goals
set
forth
in
the
community
plan
to
end
homelessness,
and
especially
the
three
that
we
called
out
in
our
memo
and
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
was
very
glad
to
to
hear
that.
They
agree
that
we
are
in
this
together
and
we
need
to
do
this
work
together
and
in
fact
they
have
been.
G
The
county
has
been
opening
new
non-congregate
shelters,
including
two
in
my
district,
one
that
was
already
opened
over
a
year
ago
and
one
that's
planned
and
that's
a
very
good
thing,
because
we
just
heard
from
Jim
how
substantially
expensive
it's
going
to
be
to
continue
to
run
shelters,
and
maybe
we
don't
need
to
continue
doing
that
and
shouldering
that
that
whole
burden.
So
my
time
is
up.
I
have
a
lot
more
to
say
and
I'll
I'll
push
my
button
again,
but
I
really
want
to
hear
what
my
colleagues
have
to
say.
B
Thanks
councilmember
appreciate
the
comments
I'm
sure
we
will
go
around
at
least
a
couple
times
appreciate
your
point
about
collaboration
with
the
county
and
and
fully
agree.
I
have
a
monthly
meeting
with
board
president
Ellenberg
and
we've
also
convened
Senator
City
staff
a
few
times
now,
and
certainly
looking
for
ways
to
leverage
each
other's
resources.
I've
also
heard
pretty
clearly
from
board
president
Ellenberg
that
she
thinks
that
having
the
city
be
more
directly
in
the
lane
of
the
interim
and
Immediate
Solutions.
Well,
the
county
continues
to
pursue
long-term
permanent.
B
J
J
I
know
that
my
team
personally
and
myself
are
excited
to
deliver
on
a
budget
that
uplifts
Working
Families
here
in
the
city
of
San
Jose,
as
I
knock
on
doors
during
my
campaign,
I
heard
concerns
about
the
impacts,
of
course,
of
the
of
the
unhoused
and
the
blight
that,
unfortunately,
in
plagues
our
that
plagues
are
our
city
streets,
though,
above
all
else,
I
saw
the
realities
in
which
many
of
our
working
class
families
are
forced
to
live.
J
In
now,
I
witnessed
overcrowded
homes,
unsanitary
conditions
and
as
a
renter
on
this
Council
I
myself
have
felt
the
fear
of
being
evicted
and
left
unable
to
find
an
affordable
place
to
live.
I
listened
as
parents
anguished
as
they
explained
that
their
rent
is
close
to
the
same
amount
that
they
bring
home
in
income
and
because
of
that
they're
unable
to
provide
healthy
meals
and
Necessities
for
their
children.
J
I
mean-
and
this
is
all
of
this
is
to
say
that
I
believe
the
most
basic
action
we
can
take
as
a
council
is
to
address
the
affordability
crisis
and
support
working
families
and
the
unhoused
community
in
San
Jose.
J
In
order
to
increase
the
city's
access
to
State
funding,
it's
important
to
establish
local
funding
sources
without
local
money
to
close
the
gap
between
outside
Investments
and
the
cost
of
affordable
development.
We
lose
access
to
those
outside
dollars.
Like
State
funding
and
I've
said
this
many
times
the
city
has
only
met
26
percent
of
its
affordable
housing
goal.
Therefore,
it's
clear
and
timely
for
us
to
protect
the
amount
of
affordable
housing.
The
city
has
the
proposal
put
forth
by
council
member
Davis
tourism.
J
It
gives
breathing
room
to
spending
to
a
spending
plan
that
is
beginning
to
demonstrate
results
as
San
Jose's
population
is
down
4.7
percent
since
last
year,
the
first
drop
in
13
years,
and
it's
it's
been
a
surprise
to
me
that
I
want
to
give
kudos
to
those
who
have
successfully
rebranded
only
two-year-old
strategy
spending
plan
as
the
status
quo.
Maybe
I
can
work
with
them,
so
they
can
help
me
Rebrand,
Copa
and
I'll
bring
it
back
to
the
council.
J
We
know
that
affordable
housing
does
not
have
an
ongoing
cost
component
for
this
city
and
although
the
sticker
shock
may
be
a
good
speaking
point
right,
we
know
that
majority
of
the
city
cities
contributions
work
as
a
loan
for
developers.
We
are
repaid
that
money.
It's
the
smartest
investment
we
can
make
at
a
time
when
our
families
needed
to
the
most
we're
making
big
strides.
Already.
Just
last
week
we
moved
to
approve
the
various
safe
parking
site
along
with
other
interim
sites.
J
We
are
addressing
our
unhoused
crisis
and
doing
so
without
jeopardizing
The
Limited
funding.
We
have
for
affordable
housing
and,
finally,
the
the
public
deserves
to
know
that
the
Davis
Ortiz
Torres
memo
does
not
require
a
super
majority
vote.
So
to
see
an
inherently
entrapped
trapping
memo
that
forces
a
rule,
a
change
to
a
rule
being
put
forth
is
incredibly
disingenuous
and
politicizes
the
guard
rails
that
we
were
that
were
established
to
protect
the
will
of
the
voters.
J
It's
my
hope
that
we
recognize
the
value
of
the
the
presented
spending
plan
and
we
work
to
see
it
through.
We
should
not
be
considering
quick
wins.
You
know
that
lack
the
investment
necessary
to
impact
lasting
change.
No,
it's
it's
not
of
the
city
council's
job
to
complete
campaign
promises
or
to
help
officials
get
reelected.
Thank
you.
BQ
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor
and
I
appreciate
the
start
of
this
conversation.
Let
me
start
first
by
thanking
the
budget
office
and
Jim
evenings
weekends.
Early
mornings,
for
the
last
few
weeks,
I
feel
like
you've
been
on
call
for
all
of
us
and
I
I
know
that
it
hasn't
been
an
easy
month
and
you've
done
a
great
job
and
then
also
all
the
summer
you
gave
us
today
is
really
helpful
as
well.
I
want
to
thank
you
for
everything.
AE
BQ
Do
want
to
while,
since
I'm
starting
there
I
want
to
put
up
some
slides
and
just
talk
a
little
bit
about
if
you
can
go
back
to
the
first
slide
and
we'll
talk
through
a
few
things.
I
know
some
of
the
folks
in
my
brown
act
are
frustrated
by
my
over
spending
so
much
time
on
the
numbers.
I'm
a
numbers
person,
but
also
the
budget,
is
numbers
so
I
think
it's
worth
talking
about
them.
BQ
You
know,
unfortunately,
the
pro
we
got
into
this
sort
of
discussion,
which
I
think
got
very
politicized
about
an
either
or
and
I.
Don't
think
any
of
us
up
here
really
want
an
either
or
and
I
think
that
we're
all
I
think
that
we're
all
aligned
on
on
on
both
being
important.
The
question
is
what
how
much,
how
many
resources
do
we
need
for
everything
to
be
successful?
BQ
My
only
objective
through
this
process
has
been
to
preserve
as
much
money
as
we
can
for
low-income,
affordable
housing
and
for,
but
also
to
make
sure
that
all
the
things
that
we've
that
we've
asked
the
city
to
do
as
far
as
interim
housing
can
be
successful,
and
we've
asked
for
a
lot
and
yes,
we've
taken
votes
like
we
did
last
week
to
to
approve
sites
like
the
RV
site,
but
we
never
really
took
any
votes
to
fund
them.
So
I
wanted
to
be
clear.
BQ
I
mean
just
because
we
passed
a
bunch
of
initiatives
to
open
interim
housing
or
to
Pat
or
to
open
an
RV
site
doesn't
mean
we
really
adequately
gave
the
staff
the
resources
they
need
to
do
it
successfully.
So
we
have
also
been
very
cognizant
over
the
last
year
or
two
about
things
that
we've
asked
staff
to
do
without
giving
them
the
extra
resources
they
need
to
do
it
and
I'm
I'm
particularly
sensitive
to
the
need
for
Staffing
that
they
need
in
order
to
make
these
successful
and
I'll.
Just
tell
you
a
great
anecdote.
BQ
BQ
The
things
we're
doing
are
touching
people
and
making
an
impact,
and
it's
it's
gratifying
for
me
and
I
think
for
everybody
in
the
city
staff
who's
working
on
this
problem
when
these
things
start
happening
so
just
to
look
on
this
on
this
chart-
and
let
me
just
start
with
the
very
bottom
row.
First,
when
councilmember,
Jimenez
and
I
put
out
our
memo,
I
wasn't
even
thinking
about
that
10.2
million
dollar
in
reserve.
BQ
That
number
is
officially
a
reallocation,
but
in
some
sense,
is
just
set
aside
with
the
intention
that
it
would
be
used
that
it's
money,
that's
in
the
future,
nofa
for
affordable
housing.
So
you
know
I,
I,
I,
don't
think
I
was
ever
wed
to
that
number.
If
you
take
that
number
out
and
we'll
get
to
that
next
slide
a
little
bit
later.
But
if
you
take
that
number
actually
I
think
slide
we'll
get
there
later,
but
Slide
Five.
BQ
If
you
take
that
number
out,
the
reallocation
that
is
asked
for
in
the
memo
that
councilmember,
Mendez
and
I
wrote
is,
is
13
million
dollars.
So
it's
not
the
magnitude
of
reallocation
out
of
affordable
housing
and
I
think
it.
It
covers
what
we
need
in
order
to
do
both
successfully
I'm.
Also
going
to
point
out,
I
I
think
it's
really
important
that
we
maintain
that
6.8
million
in
the
program
Administration
line.
BQ
That's
the
line
that
funds
the
positions
for
several
years
and
I
think
we
need
a
little
bit
more
buffer
in
the
line
for
homeless,
support
and
programs,
and
so
the
difference
between
the
32
million
dollar
in
line.
What
is
that
lines?
Five
and
the
21
million
dollar
in
the
status
in
in
the
keeping
the
the
not
not
on
not
re-reallocating
the
non-reallocation
plan?
That
number
is
where
I
think
we
have
to
bring
things
closer
together.
BQ
Let
me
ask
I,
think
I'll
ask
Jackie
in
your
department
I.
Think
I've
I've
asked
these
questions
before
of
several
people,
but
you
know:
I
know
that
we
would,
you
know,
want
to
do
things
at
all
incomes
levels,
but
can
we
talk?
Can
you
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
moderate
income
line
and
what
you
think
we
can
do
and
where
you
think
that
might
be
best
used
in
the
coming
year?.
BP
Okay,
thank
you,
okay,
so
we
have
been
thinking
quite
a
bit
about
you
know
what
to
how
to
best
utilize.
The
moderate
income
piece
of
measure,
e
and
and
I
really
think
that
the
there's
really
two
ways
to
go
forward.
One
would
be
to
fund
modern
income
within
affordable
rental
housing
developments
which
we
have.
We
have
done,
we've
done
in
Little
Bits,
but
it,
but
it's
also
it.
It
continues
to
be
an
opportunity.
There's
a
state
program
that
we
can
couple
with.
BP
So
that's
an
opportunity
and
then
the
second
opportunity,
I
would
just
say,
is,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
related
to
acquisition
rehab,
because
we
again
want
to
make
sure
we
have
a
range
of
incomes
when
we
kick
off
that
program
and
look
to
acquire
existing
buildings
so
that
we
can
avoid
displacement
of
modern
income,
households
who
may
be
living
in
in
these
buildings.
BO
And
let
me
just
add
one
there's
a
third
one:
the
tax
credit
program
was
changed
recently
and
it
allows
you
to
go
all
the
way
up
to
moderate
income
as
long
as
you
have
an
average
of
Amis
at
45
percent.
So
we
have
found
that
some
projects
do
kind
of
this
barbell
at
moderate
and
extremely
low
income
to
get
to
that
average
and
the
only
way
we've
been
able
to
subsidize
the
rental
on
the
higher
end
is
to
have
a
little
bit
of
a
pot
for
moderate
income
housing.
BO
BQ
Okay,
I
appreciate
that
I
I
had
sort
of
having
this
feeling
that
right
now,
the
balance
of
priorities
that
we're
going
to
have
to
decide
as
a
council
is
where
that
that
amount
of
Revenue
is
best
spent
in
terms
of
our
trade-off
between
the
short-term
interim
Housing
Solutions
and
the
affordable
housing
Solutions.
So
I'll
just
I'll
just
leave
it
leave
that
point
at
that
and
ask
you
to
go
to
slide
two
just
for
a
second.
BQ
If
you
look
at
slide,
two
you'll
see
that
Our
intention
when
we
put
out
our
memo,
was
to
try
to
get
to
the
to
the
same
number
for
the
nofa
for
extremely
low
and
low
income,
and
while
we
missed
by
about
1.8
million,
we
came
pretty
close
to
being
the
same
on
the
nofa
for
the
low
income
and
again,
that
was
also
can
be
enhanced
by
the
fact
that
the
10
million
in
reserve
hadn't
yet
been
well
I.
BQ
BQ
BQ
Five,
the
last
line
without
the
10.2
million
the
reallocation
number
we're
talking
about-
is
13
million,
which
is
basically
that
that
low
that
moderate
income
level
that
that
modern
income,
12.7
million,
is
pretty
much
gets
us
to
the
same
level
that
we
were
aiming
for
and
really
that
isn't
much
different
than
what
was
in
the
mayor's
June
message,
because
there
was
an
extra
there's
extra
money
in
the
mayor's
message.
For
for
the
well
there's
five
million
less
out
of
the
ending
fund.
BQ
Balance
is
one
reason,
so
those
numbers
are
much
closer
together
about
three
million
dollars
apart
when
we
add
that
extra
money
in
the
ending
fund
balance
so
I
just
wanted
to
summarize
kind
of
some
of
the
things
on
these
on
these
charts
that
are
important
and
point
out
that
I
think
that
in
reality
we're
all
really
not
that
far
apart
as
the
public
comment
and
the
rhetoric
has
will
lead
people
to
believe
we're
all
trying
to
preserve,
affordable
housing,
we're
all
trying
to
make
sure
that
we
operate
successfully.
BQ
The
the
interim
housing
sites,
given
my
desire
to
have
a
large
interim
housing
site
at
Cerrone
in
North
San
Jose,
as
we
voted
last
week
and
to
open
the
RV
site
and
make
it
successful
and
to
support
the
ones
in
other
districts
like
the
one
we
talked
about
in
District
Two
and
the
new
one
in
District
9
at
Cherry,
I'm
uncomfortable
going
with
the
straight
unallocated
budget,
simply
because
we
need
some
extra
Staffing
and
some
extra
money
in
our
operations
budget
to
make
sure
we
can
get
through
a
couple
years.
BR
Foreign
I,
too,
would
like
to
thank
the
staff,
both
in
housing
and
and
budget
office,
for
being
so
readily
available
for
answering
every
question,
even
though
we
were
dumb
questions
or
what
have
you,
especially
for
us
newbies
who
are
just
learning
the
process
and
I
want
to
thank
my
colleagues
for
trying
to
be
very
thoughtful.
I
I
really
think
that
it
is
a
situation
as
councilmember
Cohen
said
that
we're
looking
for
an
and
it's
not
one
or
the
other.
We
really
again.
BR
As
councilwoman
Davis
said
you
know,
we
are
looking
for
a
pathway
to
be
able
to
do
both
having
that
pipeline
of
affordable
housing,
as
well
as
being
able
to
address
our
you
know,
need
for
emergency
interim
housing.
You
know
as
I'm
here
as
I'm,
listening
to
all
of
the
the
comments
and
yesterday-
and
you
know
from
previous
I'm-
really
delighted
that
we
have
measure
e
other
areas.
I
was
thinking
about
this.
Other
areas
do
not
have
any
funding
to
address
these
needs.
BR
So
the
fact
that
we
have
that
I
think
it's
number
one
incredible
and
I
I
know
that
I
personally
did
not
work
on
it,
but
I
know
a
lot
of
people
did
and-
and
so,
if
we,
as
counsel
want
to
address
the
most
pressing
need
I
think
we
need
to
decide
how
we
want
to
invest,
because,
whether
it's
you
know
the
the
long-term,
affordable,
housing
and
really
having
things
in
the
pipeline
having
emergency
interim
housing
also
has
a
cost,
because
not
only
are
they
current
costs,
but
they're
also
ongoing
costs
and
at
the
end
of
the
day,
it's
a
matter
of
trade-offs.
BR
What
are
we
willing
to
invest
in
you
know.
Our
budget
is
really
a
reflection
of
our
priorities
and
if
we
believe
that
it
is
in
fact
a
priority
to
have
emergency
interim
housing
as
well
as
affordable
housing,
then
let's
put
our
money
where
our
mouth
is
and
really
do
it
and
understand
that,
in
addition
to
measure
e-funds
over
the
Long
Haul
we're
going
to
have
to
dip
into
the
general
fund
unless
we
have
a
good
economy
and
money
keeps
on
coming
in
or
we
find
alternative
sources
of
funding.
BR
You
know
it's
something
that
I
think
that
as
we
may
as
we
move
forward
and
make
these
decisions,
we
really
need
to
understand
that,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we're
going
to
make
a
commitment
in
the
general
fund
as
well.
I.
Think
that,
as
we
look
at
trying
to
find
a
solution,
we
know
that
a
one-size-fits-all
strategy
doesn't
work
right.
So,
as
I've
heard
from
housing
and
from
Advocates
and
others,
you
know
we've
learned
over
the
last
two
years:
let's
take
those
learnings
and
you
know
if
six
months
isn't
the
ideal.
BR
Maybe
it's
a
year,
maybe
it's
two
years.
Maybe
you
know
you
have
to
go
on
a
case-by-case
basis
and
I
think
that
staff
is
doing
that
so
I
I
want
to
say
thank
you
to
Seth.
We
need
a
Continuum
to
help
our
unhoused
residents
from
eih
to
permanent,
affordable
housing
and
I
really
think
that
there
are
times
when
we're
just
gonna
have
to
try
things
right.
It
may
be
uncomfortable,
but
I
do
think.
We
need
to
try
things.
I
think
that
we
need
to
find
a
way
to
support
the
RV
park.
BR
I
think
we
need
to
find
a
way
to
support
the
new
nofa
to
be
able
to
signal
to
our
partners
that,
yes,
in
fact,
we
are
going
to
make
these
Investments
and
that
we're
going
to
do
above
and
beyond
to
try
to
get
other
funding,
because
I
know
that
there
are
others
who
are
interested
in
increasing
funding.
BR
But
I
also
think
that
we
need
to
be
more
deliberate
and
my
hope
is
that
we're
able
to
come
to
some
kind
of
agreement
as
to
how
we
move
this
forward
to
do
both
and
have
that
and
I
think
that
everyone
on
the
dies
here
has
really
spent
countless
hours
working
through
and
building
the
budget
and
reflecting
you
know,
Collective
values
and
and
I
really
want
to
say.
Thank
you
to
my
colleagues,
I.
BR
Think
it's
a
little
bit
difficult
as
a
council
member
Davis
said
that
you
know
we
don't
get
the
whole
picture
because
we
can't
talk
to
each
other.
So
this
is
the.
This
is
a
dialogue
that
we
need,
and
you
know
I'm
hoping
to
hear
from
the
rest
of
my
colleagues,
because
at
the
end
of
the
day,
I
feel
that
we
need
to
move
it
forward
and
I
think
that
we
need
to
do
a
little
bit
more.
BR
What
that
number
is
or
how
that
is,
I,
don't
know,
I
think
we'll
come
to
it
together,
but
but
we
need
to
find
some
resources
for
the
Emergency
interim
housing
to
be
able
to
fund
the
positions
necessary,
even
foreign
time
to
be
able
to
move
the
needle
forward,
provide
the
services
that
are
necessary.
So
you
know
no
matter
what
happens
today.
I
think
that
this
process
is
not
just
going
to
end
here.
BR
B
Thanks
vice
mayor
appreciate
it
since
folks
are
holding
back
I'll,
go
ahead
and
offer
a
few
Reflections
and
I
want
to
I
want
to
start
by
thanking
my
brown
act
group,
as
has
been
mentioned,
that
it's
frustrating
to
not
be
able
to
have
some
back
and
forth
with
everybody
on
the
council
out
outside
of
the
meeting.
But
but
that
is
the
law
for
good
reason.
B
I
want
to
thank
vice
mayor,
kameh
and
councilman
Foley
for
working
very
closely
on
on
helping
my
team
and
I
craft,
the
June
message,
which
does
just
for
the
record
because
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
misunderstanding
about
what's
being
proposed,
certainly
not
either,
or
it
is
definitely
a
both
and
proposal
to
put
50
million
dollars
into
the
immediate,
urgent
Solutions
of
interim
housing.
B
B
I
also
want
to
thank
council
members,
Cohen
and
Jimenez
who,
throughout
the
process
also
in
our
Brown
act,
were
extremely
collaborative
and
communicative
and
offered
a
lot
of
different
proposals
and
ideas
and
put
together
what
I
thought
was
a
really
thoughtful
memo.
It
does
bring
down
a
bit
the
amount
of
funding
for
Immediate
Solutions,
but
gives
us
some
of
the
flexibility
and,
frankly
certainty.
We
need
that
the
city
is
going
to
be
committed
to
standing
up
and
operating
these
interim
Solutions.
So
the
way
I
look
at
it
is
I.
B
You
know
I
think
there's
some
good
news
here,
which
is
that
we
clearly
all
really
want
to
address
homelessness.
We
want
to
support
our
Working
Families.
We
know
we
need
both
there's
so
luckily,
there
is
a
lot
of
common
ground
here
that
we
need
both
and
and
from
the
March
message,
which
called
for
both
all
the
way
through
the
process.
Despite
a
lot
of
the
rhetoric,
I
think
it's
been
clear
to
me
that
the
the
council
believes
in
both
I
think.
B
The
only
real
question
here
is
the
mix
in
our
portfolio
and
actually
there's
there's
another
whole
category
that
we're
not
talking
too
much
about
which
is
prevention,
so
measure
e,
very
clearly
from
the
beginning.
It's
about
housing
and
homelessness.
From
from
day
one
we've
had
different
categories.
Nobody
here
suggesting
that
we
create
new
categories
of
spending,
I
would
I
would
submit
to
you
that
the
the
primary
reason
to
have
the
the
suggested
two-thirds
policy,
which
is
not
what
we
passed.
Obviously
at
the
at
the
ballot
box.
B
That
was
a
simple
bare
majority,
which
means
it's
a
general
tax,
but
the
council
policy
I
think
was
really
intended
to
keep
us
from
one
day
deciding
these
dollars
need
to
go
to
hiring
more
police
or
or
extending
Library
hours
and
I.
Think
we
want
to
make
clear
and
I
think
wherever
we
land
today,
we
are
going
to
reaffirm
our
commitment
to
keeping
the
measure
e
dollars
squarely
focused
on
homelessness
and
Housing
Solutions.
B
So
really
what
the
question
boils
down
to
is
a
judgment
call
each
of
us
has
to
make
and
I
you
know,
certainly
don't
envy
my
colleagues.
These
trade-offs
are
extremely
hard
and
the
intention
is
not
in
any
way
to
pit
one
against
the
other.
But
I
do
want
us
to
acknowledge
that
there's
a
trade-off.
A
dollar
we
spend
on
prevention
or
interim
can't
be
spent
on
the
long-term
permanent,
affordable
and
vice
versa.
The
dollar
we
put
into
affordable
can't
be
spent
for
the
RV
side
or
the
interim
side.
B
That,
unfortunately,
is
tackling
a
problem
that
I
fear
just
based
on
the
math
will
be
with
us
for
decades
and
I
wish
that
wasn't
the
case.
I
will
be
the
first
in
line
to
campaign
for
the
Regional
Housing
measure
and
to
call
on
the
state
and
federal
government
to
put
more
dollars
into
affordable
housing.
We
have
a
shortage
of
tens
of
thousands
of
units.
The
flip
side
is
that
shortage
equates
to
billions
tens
of
billions
and
tens
of
billions
of
dollars.
B
So
we
will
have
an
affordable
housing
shortage
for
decades
and
we
need
to
do
everything
in
our
power
to
Advocate,
to
the
state
and
federal
government
to
send
down
more
dollars.
We've
we've
passed
measure
e
to
help,
but
we're
going
to
need
tens
of
billions
and
I
worry
that
if
we
say
that
we
have
to
wait
to
address
the
affordable
housing
shortage
for
everyone
who
needs
it
with
a
solution.
That's
extremely
slow
and
expensive,
though
necessary
an
important
and
valuable
to
those
who
get
access
to
that
housing.
B
We
are
making
an
implicit
decision
to
leave
thousands
of
people
out
on
the
streets
without
any
stability
and
security
and
consistent
access
to
services.
So
my
hope
would
be
that
we
could
get
to
a
place
where
we
rebalance
a
bit
to
meet
the
incredible
suffering
and
urgent
need,
and
frankly,
with
our
community
I.
Think
more
than
anything
is
calling
out
for
number
one
question
I
got
across
the
city
was:
what
are
you
going
to
do
to
accelerate
the
rate
which
can
get
people
out
of
encampments?
B
B
This
is
an
existential
issue
for
our
community,
so
my
hope
would
be
that,
given
all
that,
we
could
see
a
way
to
rebalancing
toward
more
Immediate,
Solutions
and
stability
for
the
folks
suffering
on
our
streets
without,
while
still
sending
a
very
clear
signal
that
we're
going
to
continue
to
be
committed
to
subsidizing
permanent,
affordable
housing
until
we
no
longer
need
to,
and
that
may
be
for
the
rest
of
our
lifetimes.
Frankly.
B
So
we're
going
to
maintain
that
commitment,
but
that
to
me
is
the
rationale
for
rethinking
what
is
effectively
an
80
20
split
toward
very
slow
and
expensive
long-term
Solutions,
whereas
it
feels
to
me
we
should
be
much
closer
to
50
50,
given
the
crisis
on
our
streets
and
the
impacts
on
our
entire
community.
B
F
Right
mayor
and
the
council,
members
and
the
city
staff
gym,
have
you
done
any
amazing
job
of
putting
together
this
very
complex
and
a
budget
mayor's
first
budget
under
the
conditions
when
we
are
facing
the
biggest
humanitarian,
clear
suffering
and
crises
of
our
lifetime,
with
no
Solutions
Immediate
Solutions
available
each
day,
the
problem
has
been
rising,
so
the
comments
which
mayor
you
just
made
describing
where
we
have
the
money
where
we
have
the
problem,
what
balance
might
be
better
than
what
it
started
out?
F
F
F
F
That
is
what
the
role
of
eih
or
the
interim
housing
is
to
give
these
people
a
chance
to
be
instead
of
hating
hated
in
their
neighborhood
because
they
are
living
in
the
tents,
be
welcome
in
their
neighborhood
because
they
are
rebuilding
their
life,
get
the
help
of
the
neighbors
who
really
want
to
do
that.
They
just
need
to
have
an
opportunity
to
be
able
to
do
it.
So
the
interim
housing
is
a
phenomenal
thing.
It's
not
a
place
where
people
live
six
months.
F
I
became
council
member
on
June
January
30th
on
March
25th
I
was
lucky
enough
to
be
hosted
by
Jackie
and
Jim
Martin
at
the
eih
located
in
Monterey
and
Bernal
I
worked
every
inch
of
that
space
and
I
talked
to
I
tried
to
talk
to
several
people,
which
I
got
the
chance
to
talk
to
three
people.
She
told
me
this
woman
who
had
been
homeless
where
she
had
come
from
where
she
was
going,
and
you
could
see
the
glimmer
of
hope
in
her
eyes.
She
gladly
described
how
aih
having
a
place.
F
There
has
helped
given
her
the
esteem,
self-esteem,
the
confidence
in
our
future,
and
she
was
hopeful
that
soon
she
is
going
to
be
out
of
that
place
and
have
a
job
and
once
she
is
out
of
that
place,
what
was
she
going
to
do?
She
was
going
to
come
back
and
volunteer
to
help
other
people
who
are
in
the
same
predicament
and
are
getting
the
help
from
the
same
place.
F
F
The
truth
is
that
they
stay
there
as
long
as
they
need
to
to
be
able
to
move
to
the
next
place
or
the
right
place
and
average
on
the
average.
It
has
been
around
170
days,
some
longer
some
shorter,
and
we
hope
that
that
stays
number
stays
pretty
good
than
170
days
gives
people
enough
chance
to
find
either
the
A's
voucher,
rental
assistance,
voucher
or
some
of
them.
F
Some
Others
May,
but
I've,
seen
all
our
council
members
have
agreed
that
our
problem
is
real
and
the
solution
is
also
real,
that
we
need
to
provide
these
people
shelter
and
we
need
to
work
on
the
permanent
housing
permanent
housing.
As
mayor
you
just
described,
is
going
to
take
billions
of
dollars.
If
we
continue
to
do
the
way
we
are
doing.
F
As
a
result,
I
believe
we
can
do
both,
but
we
cannot
do
it
at
the
80
20
rule
and
some
people
have
raised
the
questions
about
the
technicalities
that
is
measure
e
allowed
to
really
do
what
we
are
trying
to
do
with
the
homelessness.
Yes,
it
does
and
I'm
one
of
those
sticklers
who
does
not
like
things
move
around
that
quickly.
You
might
have
remembered
me
when
I
was
talking
about
measure,
T
funds
being
moved
for
other
purposes
and
I
didn't
I
read
the
measure
is
description.
F
It
did
allow
us
that
we
could
do
it
for
homelessness
and
affordable
homes,
but
our
counselor
chose
that
at
that
time
the
data
available
that
the
best
distribution
might
be
18
20..
That
was
the
data.
That
was
the
judgment.
The
data
has
changed.
Situation
has
become
worse
and
we
need
to
really
look
at.
It
is
80
20
still
the
number
we
want
to
hang
on
to
there's
no
question:
we
can
change
it
and
we
should
change
it.
Let's
find
the
right
balance
mayor.
You
said
a
50
50
number.
F
Somebody
else
may
propose
something
else,
but
I
think
that's
the
discussion.
We
need
to
have
it's
no
question
that
we
have
to
do
the
eah
and
we
have
to
read
the
portion,
these
numbers
and
what
is
the
right
number?
Well,
let's
all
work
together
to
find
the
right
number,
which
serves
our
communities
very
well.
F
B
Okay
looks
like
we're
going
back
around
for
a
second
round,
I'm,
just
going
to
pause
for
a
moment
in
case.
Any
of
my
colleagues
who
have
not
chimed
in
yet
would
like
to
share
their
perspectives
would
be
great
to
hear
from
colleagues
your
thoughts.
G
Thank
you
bear
completely
understand
your
Viewpoint
about
Sheltering,
I
I,
do
want
to
say,
I
think
we
have
more
discussions
to
have
with
the
county
about
that.
I
understand
that
they,
your
discussions
with
with
President
Ellenberg,
have
have
been
about
our
existing
shelters,
our
city-run
shelters
and
them
not
wanting
to
cover
those
Services
I
sort
of
think.
G
So
this
is
sort
of
pre-measure
a
they
were
doing
Sheltering
and
we
were
using
Redevelopment
funds
to
to
do
affordable
housing
and
then,
with
the
loss
of
Redevelopment
and
measure,
a
those
roles
have
kind
of
flipped
but
measure
a
has
now
been
depleted
and
there
hasn't
encount.
The
county
has
taken
on
non-congregate
shelter
after
seeing
how
we've
done
non-congregate
shelters.
So
that's
why
I
think
a
50
50
split
and
going
to
adding
on
to
a
thousand
more
units
above
the
almost
a
thousand
that
we
are
already
doing
and
have
in
the
pipeline.
G
It
doesn't
really
make
sense
for
us
I
think
that,
frankly,
we
don't
have
a
plan
for
ongoing
maintenance
and
operation
of
those
shelters,
as
Jim
was
very
clear
about
and
that
the
most
likely
scenario
is
that
measure
e
in
the
future
will
be
used
solely
for
Sheltering
activities.
If
we
go
down
this
path
today,
so
that's
why,
in
our
memo
we
chose
to
prioritize
continuing
to
fill
the
pipeline
for
permanent,
affordable
housing,
because
it
is
the
only
it
is
the
long-term
and
only
true
solution
to
homelessness,
and
in
fact,
we've
seen.
G
Our
City's
unhoused
population
has
decreased
by
4.7
percent
in
the
most
recent
point
in
time.
Count
and
I
would
argue
that
this
is
largely
because
of
the
pipeline
connecting
interim
shelter
to
permanent
housing
and
Jackie
had
told
us
about
the
numbers
that
that
backs
that
up.
So
with
that
I
I'm
gonna
move
our
the
memo
by
myself,
council
member
Ortiz
and
council
member
Torres
and
I'm.
Just
going
to
strike
just
for
clarity,
I'll
strike
the
line
at
the
beginning
of
the
recommendation.
G
AY
G
You
and
just
say
that
that
I
understand
councilmember
Cohen
your
your
desire
for
for
Staffing
and
I'm
I'm.
Okay,
with
that,
what
I
don't
know
is
if
we
have
eight
votes
so
I'm,
not
sure
if
we
have
six
but
I
also
don't
know
if
we
have
eight
votes.
G
I'm
I'm
amenable
to
moving
some
funds
from
the
moderate
income
to
cover
the
Staffing,
and
we
can
talk
about
whether
we
want
to
do
that
for
two
or
three
years.
A
lot
of
younger
people
only
stay
in
jobs
for
two
years,
so
it
may
not
be
that
big
of
a
deal
if
we
cut
it
a
little
bit
to
to
do
two
years,
I'm
just
putting
that
out
there
as
a
possibility-
and
you
didn't
talk
about
the
amount
you
wanted
for
the
the
buffer
for
for
operations
and
maintenance.
G
So
I'd
like
to
hear
more
about
that
and
then
the
other
thing
I
wanted
to
do.
Wow
I'm
really
talking
a
lot
today.
I
save
it
up.
You
guys
is
ask
about
the
the
inflation
reserve
for
previously
approved
projects
and
I.
Don't
know
if
this
is
a
Rachel
or
Jackie
question,
but
you
would
put
in
there
11
million
dollars.
We
all
know
inflation's
gone
crazy.
It
was
more
for
construction.
The
last
I
heard
about
it.
BP
Okay,
thank
you
for
the
question.
We
arrived
at
the
11
million
dollar
number
by
looking
at
our
existing
funding
commitments
and
under
the
delegation
of
authority
to
the
housing
director.
The
director
has
the
ability
to
increase
those
funding
commitments
by
20
percent
in
order
to
address
any
costs
that
were
unanticipated,
which
it
doesn't
always
go
to
20,
but
it
can
and
then
that
way
we
can
still
close
the
deal
without
having
to
come
back
and
ask
for
additional
funds
and
everything.
BP
So
what
we
did
is
we
looked
at
all
of
the
funding
commitments
that
we've
already
made,
and
then
we
applied
20
to
that.
That's
how
we
got
to
11
million
I
would
say
two
things.
I
would
say
again.
It
is
not
typical
that
we
use
20
on
every
single
one.
So
that's
a
fact.
Number
two
I
think
we
do
have
a
little
bit
of
time
on
our
on
our
side,
because
those,
basically
it's
between
the
time
that
a
funding
commitment
is
made
and
the
deal
is
actually
closing
on
financing.
BP
AE
BP
G
I
would
invite
amendments
to
maybe
come
from
either
the
inflation
Reserve
or
previously
approved
projects,
or
some
amount
from
there,
and
maybe
some
amount
from
the
moderate
income
households
with
the
with
the
knowledge
that
we
want
to
keep
some
amount
in
the
not
in
the
moderate
income
households
to
meet
those
three.
Those
three
goals
that
that
Jackie
and
Rachel
were
talking
about,
with
the
reason
that
we
put
the
moderate
income
into
the
nofa.
B
And
you're
hoping
for
some
amendments,
some
amendments
and
other
commentary
appreciate
that
you
know
I
I
do
I
want
to
just
quickly
comment
on
a
on
a
couple
of
the
item,
topics
that
have
come
up
and
then
I'll
turn
to
my
colleagues
in
a
moment.
One
is
this
question
of
of
operating
costs,
and
it's
no
doubt
that,
should
we
fully
build
out
what
we've
discussed
getting
to
50
60
million
a
year
in
operating
costs
is,
is
no
small
amount
of
money.
B
B
I
would
argue
even
at
that
magnitude,
for
what
is
arguably
our
greatest
challenge
in
crisis
as
a
city,
that's
a
number
I
think
we
can
handle
I
think
we
will
likely
over
time
see
measure
e
Revenue
go
up,
which
would
imply
that
we
would
not
consume
all
of
the
measury
dollars,
but
I
do
think
still
to
me
there's
a
very
strong
moral
and
practical
reason
for
quickly
and
as
efficiently
and
cost
effectively
as
possible,
creating
placements
for
people
to
get
out
of
unmanaged
unsheltered
conditions.
B
Just
the
suffering
people
are
going
through
the
tax
on
the
rest
of
the
system.
We
will
actually
find
savings
by
getting
people
out
of
tent
encampments
and
unmanaged
RVs.
We
won't
won't
be
fungible.
We
won't
be
able
to
take
the
money
from
the
emergency
rooms
or
the
or
the
fire
department
and
spend
them
in
other
ways
necessarily,
but
everyone
else
will
get
a
better
quality
of
service
and
I
think
we'll
see
more
investment
in
our
city.
B
More
organic,
organic
growth
of
the
tax
base,
I
think
you'll,
see
San
Jose's
want
to
spend
more
time
and
dollars
frankly
in
our
own
city,
rather
than
going
to
Campbell
for
dinner,
I
always
pick
on
Campbell
no,
no
offense
to
Campbell.
If
anybody's
listening
from
Campbell
I
also
want
to
know,
this
conversation
is
actually
playing
out
in
all
the
big
cities
in
the
state
right
now.
Mayor
bass,
current
bass
down
in
La
is
leading
the
same
discussion
and
pushing
toward
more
interim
Solutions.
Getting
people
indoors
faster
and
I
I.
B
Think
what
you'll
see
in
this
a
little
bit
speculative
but
based
on
conversations
I've
been
in
with
the
governor
and
others
in
Sacramento
I.
Do
think
you
will
see
state
and
federal
dollars
flow
to
solutions
that
get
people
out
of
unmanaged
encampments,
faster
I,
don't
think
it'll
cover
all
the
costs,
but
we
were
strongly
encouraged
to
apply
for
encampment
resolution
grants
to
help
operate
eih
and
to
go
big.
Ask
for
10
million
dollars,
I
think
you're
going
to
see
I
think
we're
in
a
fluid
policy.
Environment
I.
B
Don't
think
anyone
I,
don't
think
anyone
on
this
Deus
or
or
hopefully
anyone
in
Sacramento
is
going
to
say
that
we
don't
need
to
build
a
lot
more
housing,
I
suspect
in
the
long
run,
a
lot
of
the
volume
for
that
housing
is
going
to
come
from
us
over
time,
removing
barriers
to
private
investment
and
building
a
lot
more
supply
of
market
rate.
In
addition
to
continuing
to
subsidize
and
chip
away
at
this
huge
deficit
of
affordable
housing
that
again,
I
think
is
just
going
to
be
with
us
for
decades.
B
So
I
just
want
to
note
that
I
I
think
there's
a
fluid
environment.
I,
just
I
worry
about
us,
taking
a
snapshot
and
it
being
super
static
and
thinking
that
things
won't
evolve
over
time
and
then
on
this
point
of
people
getting
stuck
and
into
them
look
I
think
the
number
our
unsheltered
homelessness
number
has
come
down
from
combination
of
factors.
I
do
think
it
is
not
a
coincidence
that
we
significantly
ramped
up
interim
placements
and
hotel
vouchers
in
the
last
couple
of
years
in
response
to
the
pandemic.
B
B
I
would
still
argue
that
I
think
philosophically
getting
folks
into
a
stable,
managed
environment
with
consistent
Services,
where
there's
Safety
and
Security,
even
if,
if
there
isn't
as
much
flow
as
we'd
like
is
so
much
better
I
just
did
my
final
budget
Town
Hall
out
at
roof,
Ferrari
talking
to
the
folks
at
roof
Ferrari
and
to
a
person
they
were
like.
Thank
you.
This
saved
my
life.
B
This
is
10
times
better
than
living
in
a
tent,
so
I
know
we
don't
want
people
to
get
stuck
in
interim
housing
and
certainly
we're
going
to
need
Pathways,
and
there
are
many
different
Pathways
for
folks,
but
again
we
just
we
have
finite
dollars
and
and
thus
far
no
one
has
put
on
the
table
anything
else
that
they're
willing
to
sacrifice.
I
haven't
heard
anybody
put
on
the
table,
Staffing
or
services
and
other
departments,
which
is
why
we
face
this
really
challenging
trade-off
question.
B
I
think
we
need
to
fill
in
in
bright,
green
everything
in
in
this
this
this
final
or
second,
to
last,
chart
here
of
kind
of
the
direction
that
we
have
already
given
multiple
times
past
councils
is
given
our
council
is
given
I
think
we
need
to
be
much
much
Bolder
and
have
the
faith
that
the
policy
environment
and
funding
from
state,
county
and
federal
sources
will
continue
to
evolve
and
it'll
be
dynamic
and
iterative
based
on
which
Solutions
are
giving
people
the
most
dignity
and
help
today
and
addressing
the
number
one
frustration.
B
The
residents
of
our
city
and
state
have,
which
is
the
fact
that
we
have
thousands
of
people
living
outside
and
completely
unmanaged
conditions
without
access
to
Services
I
think
that
demand's
not
going
away
until
we
are
much
Bolder
and
you're.
Seeing
cities
across
the
state
start
to
make
this
shift.
So
with
that
I
I
will,
for
the
sake
of
I,
feel
an
obligation
to
the
residents
based
on
what
I
have
been
communicating.
And
discussing
with
folks
for
the
past
two
years
to
make
a
substitute
motion
to
at
least
put
the
June
message
on
the
table.
B
It
may
not
have
the
votes,
I
understand
it
requires
two-thirds,
but
it
does
move
us
to
50
50
for
the
current
dollars.
It
says:
50
million
for
new,
affordable
projects,
50
million
for
Immediate
Solutions
to
unsheltered
homelessness,
to
get
people
out
of
encampments,
safe
parking,
interim
housing
and
yes,
we're
still
keeping
that
36
million
for
previously
approved
projects.
So
it
shows
a
strong
commitment
to
both,
but
it
is
a
real
rebalancing
to
meet
the
immediate,
urgent
need
and
suffering,
and
the
number
one
ask
our
community
has,
which
is
help.
E
Thank
you
mayor.
You
know,
I,
want
to
begin
my
comments,
thanking
the
six
hours
of
of
members
of
our
community,
who
came
out
to
voice
their
their
their
opinion
on
on
this
year's
budget
and
specifically,
what
we
do
with
this
measury
issue.
E
You
know
the
different
directions
and
possibilities
of
the
city
that
we
can
do
with
this
and
lastly,
I
want
to
thank
my
colleagues
for
their
leadership
in
in
the
different
memorandums
that
were
issued
and
putting
my
team
to
work.
We
recognized
that
the
city
is
in
a
is
in
a
housing
crisis.
It's
multifaceted.
It
can
be
attributed
to
our
lack
of
affordable
housing
production.
E
That's
stemmed
almost
a
decade
back
with
the
loss
of
Redevelopment,
the
rising
rental
costs,
just
the
sheer
cost
of
how
expensive
it
it
is
in
our
region
or
income.
Inequality
folks
are
suffering
whether
they're
unhoused
or
whether
they're
housed
but
they're
on
the
verge
of
becoming
homeless,
and
so
that's
also
a
real,
a
real
need,
and
you
know
I
want
to
share
something
that
that's
some.
Some
a
resident
in
San
Jose
told
me
an
example
from
theater
and
I'll
I'll
caveat
this
that
I'm
not
a
theater
going
person.
Okay.
E
So
the
example
that
this
resident
said
permanent
Supportive
Housing
should
be
the
play.
Okay
and
interim
housing
sites
and
interim
Housing
Solutions
are
like
the
rehearsals,
the
dozens
and
dozens
of
rehearsals
that
folks
who
go
see
place
that
that
the
goal
is
the
play.
E
We
don't
go,
see
rehearsals,
so
our
goal
as
a
city
should
be
to
do
a
play
to
do
more
permanent
Supportive
Housing-
and
this
is
this-
is
this
example
stuck
to
me
not
only
because
I
respect
the
resident,
who
happens
to
be
County
Board
of
supervisor
Susan
Ellenberg,
but
because
of
the
way
it
translates
and
the
way
it
left
the
mark
on
on
the
fact
that
we
should
look
for
permanent,
Supportive
Housing
as
our
goal.
At
the
same
time,
I
also
recognize
that
we
need
to
do
more
for
interim
housing
because
we
need
we.
E
We
need
a
place
for
folks
to
go.
We
can't
just
debate
and
you
know,
send
unhoused
across
the
street:
have
them
go
somewhere
else
until
our
crews
go
and
come
back?
This
is
something
I
saw
over
and
over,
while
working
in
the
state
legislature
on
issues
around
Caltrans.
I
recognize
that-
and
you
know,
I
I
do
want
to
I,
do
want
to
say
something
that
it's
it's
not
an
either
or-
and
this
is
what
the
conversation
is
coming
down
to.
It's
not
yeah.
E
There
are
trade-offs,
but
all
three
proposals
are
doing
something
for
interim
housing
and
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we're
if,
if
one,
if
one
memorandum
or
the
other
or
if,
if
the
memorandum
from
from
my
colleague
Davis
or
for
for
them
for
the
mayor,
all
of
them
are
proposing
to
do
interim
housing
and
it's
going
to
take
time.
So
so,
if
we
don't
do
one
or
the
other
we're
not
going
to
not
produce
interim
housing
sites,
that's
that's
a
red
herring
and
wish
I
caveat
and
I
caution.
E
My
Council
colleagues
not
not
to
not
to
follow
that
route,
because
that's
that's
disingenuous
and
to
say
this
is
the
Silver
Bullet
approach
to
our
city
is
is
wrong
and
and
it's
electioneering
and
I'm
not
for
that.
What
I
am
for
is
finding
solutions
that
we
can
all
get
behind
and
and
and
seeing
what's
going
to
help
our
residents.
We
know
the
the
permanent
support
of
housing
takes
time.
E
We
know
that,
but
if
we
take
our
foot
off
the
gas
and
show
the
the
affordable
housing
development
community
that
we're
not
serious
and
and
they're
going
to
go
put
their
money
somewhere
else,
that's
that's
not
leadership,
so
you
know
all
that
to
say
is:
is
I
I
hope
we
can
we
we
can
get
to
a
place
ultimately
that
that
that
that
that
works
and-
and
it's
it's
it's
unfortunate
that
that
you
know
we're
we're
telling
half
truths
and
whole
lies
and
in
our
messaging
and
our
in
our
advocacy,
to
get
support
for
our
our
different
memorandums
and
and
that
I'll
yield
the
rest
of
my
time.
B
BS
Thank
you,
I've
been
sitting
listening
to
the
discussion
and
and
realizing
that
I
need
to
say
a
few
things,
but
can't
council,
member
Candelas
are
probably
triggered
me
because
you
started
talking
about
theater
and
I
thought.
F
BS
Maybe
not
so
much
and
using
that
reference
both
are
important.
BS
I
have
several
units
going
up
in
District
9
in
various
stages
of
proposals
that
have
some
nofa
approvals,
but
that
will
likely
need
more
because
of
the
inflation
costs,
and
then
we
have
other
units
other
projects
coming
through
that
are
still
working
on
their
funding
and
will
benefit
potentially
from
the
future
novas
that
we
have
so
I.
You
know
we
we've
talked
about
both
we
need
both.
We
absolutely
need
both.
We
need
to
address
the
humanity
crisis
that
we
have
of
the
number
of
unhoused
residents.
BS
We
have
on
our
streets,
we
need
to
help
them
by
providing
interim
emergency
interim
housing,
but
that's
not,
and
this
and
the
services
that
go
with
it,
but
that's
not
the
only
solution.
We
need
to
also
provide
affordable
housing.
The
question
in
the
budget
is:
how
do
we
do
that?
Where
do
we
get
the
money
from
and
what
trade-offs
are
we
making?
BS
So
when
I
think
about
the
budget,
I
think
you
know
it
would
be
great
to
have
all
of
these
things.
The
budget
itself
isn't
calling
for
any
Cuts
in
our
operating
in
the
services
that
we
operate.
There's
no
most
of
the
items
in
the
June
budget
message
are
things
that
we
are
continuing
on
from
year
and
year
year
to
year,
there's
no
cutbacks.
BS
If
we
need
to
take
money
from
the
general
fund
to
pay
for
the
eihs
or
the
services,
then
it
has
to
come
from
the
general
fund
and
it
has
to
come
if
it
doesn't
come
from
measure
e
has
to
come
from
the
general
fund
and
there
has
to
be
trade-offs.
We
have
to
be
prepared
to
say
we're
not
going
to
do
this,
we're
not
going
to
do
that,
we're
going
to
reduce
Library
hours,
which
is
not
anything
I
want
to,
but
I'm
just
suggest
saying.
BS
We
have
to
look
at
things
that
we're
going
to
cut
if
we
truly
want
to
build,
affordable
housing
and
which
we
can
use
measure
E4,
and
we
can
use
a
measure
e
for
eih,
but
it
requires
based
on
the
mayor's
message
and
the
Cohen's
Jimenez
memo
that
hasn't
been
moved
yet
both
require
changes
to
the
allocations
which
require
the
two-thirds.
BS
The
current
proposal
on
the
table
and
and
councilmember
Davis
I
really
appreciate
you
starting
off
with
let's
collaborate
and
work
together,
and
you
can
hear
we're
kind
of
well
I,
don't
know
what
that
means,
because
we're
I
mean
we're
trying
to.
We
have
two
brown
acts
and-
and
we
have
a
Swing
Vote
I'm,
just
throwing
it
out
there
not
saying
who
is
it.
It
is,
but
it's
just
saying
that,
because
we
can't
have
this
conversation
until
just
now,
we
can't
really
have
a
good
vibrant
conversation
which
we
we
are.
BS
We
all
believe
that
we
need
to
that.
We
have
a
humanitarian
crisis.
There's
no
question
that
11
of
us
believe
that
11
of
us
believe
that
affordable
housing
is
important
and
11
of
us
believe
that
building
emergency
housing
is
important
and
the
support
services.
You
cannot
be
successful
if
we
just
build
the
housing
and
or
build
the
interim
housing,
and
we
do
not
have
the
support
services,
because
those
individuals
will
not
be
successful.
We
will
be
setting
them
up
for
for
failure.
BS
So
I'm
I'm
not
going
to
make
an
amendment
I'm
hoping
someone
else.
BS
Will
that
may
bring
in
the
dollars
that
we
may
need
or
that
we
find
the
money
within
the
general
funds,
but
frankly
I'm
looking
at
the
general
fund
and
thinking
I,
don't
know
where
we
can
go
to
cut
I'm,
not
sure
which
programs
I
want
to
cut,
but
Jim
Shannon
the
budget
directors
over
there
freaking
out
a
little
bit
that
we
might
be
going
to
the
general
fund
and
the
other
thing
is
that
I
just
want
to
throw
it
out
there
and
and
is
that
we
we
haven't
completed
negotiations
with
a
couple
of
our
bargaining
units
and
so
I'm
curious
about
the
impact
of
our
budget
on
that
sore.
BS
That
issue,
which
also
is
serious
and
needs
to
be
addressed
so
I,
don't
really
have
the
formulation
of
a
question
other
than
a
speech,
and
obviously
you
know
that's
what
I've
been
giving
but
I
just
want
you
to
know.
I
will
be
thoughtful
as
I'm
listening
to
the
discussion
and
the
debate
going
forward
and
to
me
it
isn't
a
question
of
either
or
it
is
a
question
of
both
and
how
we
get
to
both
and
selfishly
I
have
an
eih
that
we
just
approved
last
week
on
Cherry
Avenue.
BS
That
I
really
want
it
to
be
successful
and
we
don't.
If
we
don't
have
enough
money
to
build
it
and
con
and
construct
it,
and
we
don't
have
enough
money
for
the
servicing
of
it.
Then
it's
going
to
fail
and
that's
a
problem.
That's
a
problem
for
the
residents
who
will
be
occupying
it.
It's
a
problem
for
the
residents
who
surround
that
area.
So
with
that
I'll
I'll
leave
it
at
that
and
look
forward
to
more
conversation
from
my
colleagues.
Thank
you.
B
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
Prevention,
there
are
some
money
also
to
run
the
program
appropriately,
because
we
don't
do
anything
right
now
and
we
continue
the
way
we
are.
We
are
going
to
drive
the
city
right
into
the
mud
and
I.
Don't
think
any
one
of
us
want
to
see
that
we
have
the
responsibility
to
act
and
we
cannot
do
the
exact
same
thing
and
expect
different
result.
BT
BT
Yes,
there's
always
those
Roblox
right
and
there
are
difficult
time
to
work
with
or
County
to
provide
health
care
and
Drug
addictions
and
Mental
Illness.
But
those
are
things
that
will
work
out
in
the
end,
but
as
of
right
now,
the
number
one
needs
is
shelter
and
we
need
to
allow
the
little
dignity
of
Being
Human.
BT
To
to
live
in
a
place
that
they're
being
protected
and
wrap
around
with
services
and
quit
pointing
fingers,
I
I
just
can't
stand
the
fact
that
we
sit
up
here
and
pointing
fingers
and
that
oh,
they
do
this,
and
they
do
that.
No
we're
all
up
here
to
serve
our
constituent
of
the
city
of
San
Jose,
we're
all
working
towards
the
same
solution
and
some
may.
BT
Yes,
we
may
disagree,
but
we
don't
point
fingers
and
none
of
us
up
here
when
we
ran
for
a
position,
I
believe
we
we
say
what
we're
going
to
do
and
we
do
what
we're
going
to
say
and
I
I
believe
that
the
mayor
made
promises
that
he
want
to
keep
to
our
constituent
and
I.
Think
every
one
of
us
want
to
do
the
same
thing.
BT
BT
BT
BT
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
I
appreciate
your
comments
on
the
the
key
Point
here.
I
think
is
that
we
may
have
a
disagreement
over
the
outcomes,
but
I
don't
think
we
should
be
questioning
folks
motives
to
your
point,
I
think,
that's
well
taken
I
think
we
may
be
willing
to
make
different
trade-offs,
short
term
long
term
focus
on
encampments
versus,
affordable
housing,
but
yeah
I.
Don't
think
it's
helpful
to
accuse
folks
of
things.
Okay,
we
have
not
heard
yet
from
councilor
Jimenez,
so
we'll
go
there.
Next.
D
Thank
you,
you
know,
there's
a
lot
to
be
said,
a
lot
of
numbers
that
have
been
thrown
around
and
for
me
it
just
the
I
can't
help,
but
think
you
know
putting
up
something.
You
don't
need
to
put
up
the
slides
Jim,
but
the
slides
that
show
the
different
plans.
It
seems
to
me
that
the
the
Cohen
he
memes
he
met
his
memos,
looking
look
looking
better
and
better
as
a
place
to
land
because
it
really
takes
the
best
the
best
of
both
worlds.
D
In
my
mind,
but
but
anyhow,
you
know
this
issue
to
me
is
challenging
because
it
really
pits
two
critical
things
against
each
other
right
at
affordable
housing,
I've
been
in
office
for
a
little
while
now,
but
even
when
I
ran
and
even
now,
I
can
keep
hearing
about
just
the
cost
of
housing
that
prevents
a
lot
of
people
from
actually
putting
down
roots
in
the
city
of
San.
D
Jose
are
having
to
move
to
other
cities
on
and
on
right
families,
just
being
cramped
in
houses
and
apartments,
my
own
family
experiencing
that
actually
living
in
affordable
housing
and
that's
a
very
real
problem.
That's
persistent
that
we've!
That's
been
around
for
some
time.
Unfortunately,
we've
made
very
little
Headway
in
tackling
that,
but
likewise
the
other
issue.
That's
obviously
pitted
against.
D
That
is
just
the
the
you
know,
trying
to
get
Joe
schmoe
off
The
Corner
out
of
a
tent
right
and
trying
to
get
him
in
a
place
to
live,
not
only
for
for
because
it's
the
right
thing
to
do
for
him,
but
also
because
we
get
calls
about
that
every
single
day,
I
think
every
touches.
D
This
is
one
of
those
issues
that
touches
the
vast
number
of
departments
within
the
city,
and
so
that's
what
I
think
makes
this
this
topic
this
budget,
this
discussion
about
measury
a
challenging
one
and
so
for
me,
is,
as
I
was
sitting
down
with
councilmember
Cohen,
trying
to
think
about
the
best
approach.
I
really
thought
that
trying
to
in
my
mind
in
a
very
simplistic
way,
is
how
could
we
do
both
because
I
think
both
are
absolutely
necessary
and
I
know.
It's
been
said
time
and
again.
D
So
that's
why
I
didn't
raise
my
hand
earlier,
because
everyone
was
saying
things
that
I,
probably
am
going
to
say
or
would
have
touched
on,
and
so
I
think
it's
something
that
we
all
recognize
that
we
we
want
to
do
both,
because
both
are
necessary.
I
know
that
housing
is
superbly
important,
but
it
takes
a
while,
obviously
getting
having
a
sort
of
a
midpoint.
D
We
were
talking
about
sanctioned
encampments
as
an
example
and
I
think
that
all
should
be
on
the
table
to
be
honest
with
you,
I
I
think
and
some
may
say:
well,
that's
not
a
dignified
sort
of
way
to
for
folks
to
live,
but
they're
living
in
worse
conditions
now
and
so
I
think
anything,
that's
a
step
up
from
you
know
these
these,
these
very
disorganized
encampments
that
are
just
exploding
with
with
garbage
and
other
such
things.
D
I
think
we
need
to
bring
some
water
to
the
space
and
we,
as
a
city
have
the
the
resources
it
seems
to
do
that,
and
so
that's,
why
very
important
conversation
very
difficult
conversation
again.
I
think
the
memo
that
we
put
forward
is
a
good
landing
spot.
I
think
it's
the
best
of
both
worlds.
It
allows
us
to
do
some
meaningful
work
in
the
eih
space,
but
also
I
think
maintains
the
commitment
to
building
more
housing
for
the
long
term,
which
I
think
is
very
important.
D
The
other
thing
that
I
think
is
important
to
note
and
the
reason
I'm
supportive
of
our
approach
and
I
hope
we
do
have
the
a
boat
to
do
this
is:
is
that
we've
already
time
and
again
as
a
council
given
direction
for
you
as
staff
in
the
city
to
go
out
and
do
this
work
and
and
to
I?
Think
council
member
Cohen
mentioned
earlier
that
now
we
need
to
Resource
that
action
right.
We
need
to
provide
you
the
resources
to
go
out
and
do
what
we've
already
said
to
go.
D
Really
what
we're
asking
in
this
and
the
reason
we
put
together
this
compromise,
to
bring
the
Best
of
Both
Worlds
together,
is
really
to
give
us
that
ability
to
you
know
for
those
of
us
that
that
are
willing
and
able
to
step
up
and
and
start
creating
some
of
these
eihs
in
our
district
to
give
us
the
resources
to
do
that.
I!
D
Don't
I'm
not
interested
in
voting
for
something
that's
going
to
starve
that
that
effort
that
action,
that
momentum,
that
I
think
has
been
built
up
with
you
know
amongst
us,
but
but
also
you
know,
I
remember
having
a
meeting
at
the
Hayes
Mansion
when
there's
about
500
people
yelling
at
me,
because
we
were
thinking
about
doing
one
of
these
early
on
and
and
to
sit
here
and
think
and
just
yesterday
the
five
or
six
hours
of
public
comment
it
was
I
was
a
little
bit
in
in
awe
as
to
how
far
we've
come
I
think
things
have
deteriorated
so
much
on
the
street
for
our
neighbors,
seeing
what's
happening
on
the
street
that
you're
actually
getting
folks
that
I
would
have
never
thought
would
have
said
hey.
D
We
need
to
do
something
and
so
I
think
we
I'm
not
saying
spend
all
the
money
on
that
right,
but
we
need
to
dedicate
some
resources
to
that.
I
think
we
have
a
very
narrow
window
of
time
in
which
it
seems
to
me
that
we
have
some
unique
buy-in
from
residents
that
are
willing
to
take
on
some
of
this.
That,
maybe
previously
were
in
that
Hayes
Mansion
yelling
at
me
and
others
that
were
part
of
that.
That
will
now
stepping
stepped
up
and
said
that
this
is
a
potential
solution.
D
So
the
memo,
what
I'm,
sure
and
I'm
sure
this
there's
gonna,
you
know
if
there
is,
if
it
goes
back
to
that.
If
this
vote
fails,
I'm
going
to
go
back
to
the
Motions
I
hope
it.
We
add
some
friendly
amendments
to
make
it
more
palatable
to
get
the
eight
votes,
but
I
think
it's
just
a
way
for
us
to
try
to
do
everything.
That's
on
the
table.
D
That's
really
what
I'm
interested
in,
not
you
know
and
I
know
it's
very
easily
with
the
politics
of
all
this
to
pit
one
you
know:
building
eihs
against,
affordable
housing
and
I
know
on
both
ends
of
expect
Spectrum.
It's
just
become
a
little
nasty
at
times,
but
I
think
there
are
folks
and
I
try
to
be
in
that
space
with
many
of
our
colleagues
that
try
to
figure
out.
D
What's
that
middle
road
that
we
can
take,
where
we're
doing
a
little
bit
of
both
and
so
I
hope
that
today
is
what
prevails
because
I
think
that's
what
our
residents
demand
of
us
to
solve
the
homelessness
that's
going
on
today,
but
also
looking
out
into
the
future
to
build
the
affordable
housing
and
so
I
think
our
memo
sort
of
a
attempts
to
solve
that
and
bring
that
forward.
So
those
are
my
comments.
Thank.
B
N
Yes
good
afternoon,
thank
you
mayor
and
thank
you
Council
for
the
robust
dialogue,
major
thank
you
to
our
our
city
staff,
who
have
picked
up
at
odd
hours
of
the
of
the
time
of
the
day,
for
you
know
all
these
memos
and
what
we're
thinking
and
how
we
solve
this
humanitarian
crisis
that
we
have
at
hand
and
I'm
I'm.
N
Very
glad
that
my
colleagues
continue
to
say
humanitarian
crisis,
because
that's
where
we're
at
and
we've
reached
at
this
point,
we've
reached
boiling
point
with
this
humanitarian
crisis,
and
it's
you
know
it's
it's
very
sad
that
I
had
to
get
politicized,
but
you
know
here
we
are
dealing
with
with
you
know
that
those
ramifications.
So,
while
you
know
others
agree
that
diverting
measure
e
funds,
May
temporarily
solve
the
immediate
crisis
of
homeless
individuals
and
Families,
currently
living
in
our
streets
next
year,
we
will
be
back
once
again.
N
If
we
continue
to
to
go
with
the
route.
I
hope
my
Council
doesn't
go
through.
We
will
be
here
again
trying
to
divert
more
major,
more
measury
funds
towards
temporary
solutions,
while
permanent
solutions
to
our
housing
crisis
continues
unresolved
and
with
even
less
funding
so
kicking
the
can
down.
The
road
I
in
good
conscience
cannot
vote
for
the
reallocation
of
quick
builds
knowing
we
do
not
have
the
sites
for
a
thousand
units
and
knowing
that
the
cost
of
the
maintenance
and
operations
could
run
as
high
as
60
million
dollars.
N
So
temporary
housing
Solutions
cannot
be
the
end
to
end
all
to
solving
this
crisis.
However,
diverting
measure
e-funding
for
this
purpose
will
only
delay
the
building
of
permanent,
supportive
and
affordable
housing.
Homelessness
in
San
Jose
will
only
get
worse,
especially
for
our
families,
who
cannot
live
in
quick,
build
communities
comfortably.
N
As
someone
who
has
continuously
advocated
for
youth
of
families,
I
cannot
vote
for
the
mayor's
motion.
I
fear
that
building
adequate
permanent
Supportive
Housing
I
fear
that
without
building
permanent
Supportive
Housing,
the
cost
of
temporary
solutions
will
only
grow,
because
the
demand
for
temporary
solutions
will
only
grow.
When
will
this
end?
Where,
where
will
the
funding
for
affordable
housing
come
from?
N
Solving
this
solving
this
housing
crisis
is
one
of
my
top
priorities
and
on
the
campaign,
Trail
I
too
also
promised
that
measure
e
will
be
building
affordable,
housing
for
our
on-house
community
and
so
I'm
willing
to
work
with
anybody
anywhere.
Anyone
here
to
find
ways
to
streamline
the
process
for
building
more
affordable
housing
projects
across
our
city,
and
hopefully
we
do
so
quickly.
So
I
hope
that
my
Council
colleagues
join
me
in
supporting
our
memo.
I'm
still
hopeful
that
we
can
do
this
and
we
could
do
this
together.
Thank
you.
B
Thanks,
council
member
just
plenty
of
information
for
the
administration,
do
we
have
a
concern
about
not
being
able
to
use
the
funds
in
the
June
message
to
build
out
to
the
Thousand
units?
Do
we
not
have
the
sites
or
I
thought
we
actually
just
done
a
bunch
of
work
to
identify
potential
sites
to
get
to
a
thousand
interim
units
I
think
there
may
be
some
question
about
the
exact
timeline,
but
can
we
can
we
just
clarify
that
point?
I,
don't
know
that
that's
accurate.
BN
Sure,
yeah
yeah,
so
I
I
can
point
to
MBA
19,
which
was
our
updated
interim
housing
forecast.
BN
We
had
talked
about
sort
of
what
we
see
in
front
of
us
and
what
council
is
pointing
us,
the
path
on
which
includes
the
surrounding
the
Sherry
sites
and
the
Berryessa
sites.
So
when
we
look
at
sort
of
what
what
we
have
and
what
we
have
in
front
of
us
that
we're
proceeding
down
the
path
on
and
then
what
that
60
million
dollar
number
is
based
on
is
the
is
the
Thousand
interim
housing
beds,
280
hotel
rooms
and
156
supportive
parking
spaces.
BN
BN
Is
some
just
just
yeah?
It's
a
combination
of
outside
sources
and
general
fund
sources,
combination,
yeah,.
E
That
yeah
the
first
the
first
a
thousand
interim
housing
units
on
in
the
in
the
in
the
slide.
You
got
it
not
the
second
correct
to
okay.
BN
E
B
We
definitely
don't
have
have
not
identified
the
sites
for
the
next
one
thousand,
but
to
be
clear,
this
Council
and
previous
councils
have
given
direction
to
get
to
the
first
thousand,
which
will
not
be
funded,
or
at
least
we'll
have
to
figure
out
some
other
way
to
fund
at
some
point.
If,
if
we
go
with
the
Davis
Taurus
Ortiz
memo,
so
that
would
become
an
unfunded
Mandate
of
some
kind
which
we'll
have
to
sort
out
okay,
council
member
batra
go
ahead.
All.
F
F
Somebody
from
housing
can
correct
that
we
do
get
affordable
homes
created
out
of
our
inclusury
policy
and
and
I'm
looking
at
it
right
now.
One
of
the
items
we're
supposed
to
hold
on
today
is
from
Planning
Commission
item
10.2.
In
our
memo,
where
we
are
approving
something
for
the
Berryessa
site,
and
it
is
it's
a
zero
subsidy
taken
by
the
developer
or
intended
to
be
taken
by
the
developer,
which
will
include
affordable
units
and
a
total
of
somewhere
around
thousand
units
to
be
billed
590
Condominiums.
F
BO
Yes,
so
we
do
get
affordable,
housing
from
other
either
funding
sources
or
if
there
are
other
strategies
such
as
inclusionary
housing.
However,
inclusionary
housing
does
not
provide
permit
Supportive
Housing,
so
it
is
not
a
resource
that
we
could
look
to
to
end
homelessness.
Measure
e
has
been
our
largest
source
of
affordable
housing
funds
since
we
lost
Redevelopment
all.
F
BO
F
Yeah,
so
those
those
would
be
coming
from
our
measure
a
and
the
ones
who
are
not
measured
here,
measure
e
projects
they
will
be
suitable
for
certain
number
of
affordable
people,
the
ones
who
need
affordable
logs.
So
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
this
is
not
the
only
source
where
the
affordable
and
if
the
marketplace
really
picks
up
that,
you
get
a
lot
of
your
inclusionary
policy
work
and
also
some
of
the
things
you're
trying
to
streamline.
F
BO
Again,
it
is
an
additional
tool
in
our
toolbox,
but
measure
e
has
been
the
tool
in
our
toolbox
that
has
been
used
to
replace
our
our
Redevelopment
funds
and
I.
Think
what
I
just
want
to
make
really
clear
is
that
other
tools,
such
as
inclusionary,
do
not
reach
deeply.
So
one
of
the
priorities
of
the
council
has
been
to
fund
not
only
permanent
Supportive
Housing,
but
extremely
low-income
housing
in.
AQ
BO
The
city,
because,
if
we're
talking
about
failures
that
the
city
has
had
over
the
15
years,
I've
been
here
when
I
first
got
here,
no
one
wanted
to
build
housing.
If
we
wanted
to
focus
on
jobs
now,
we've
had
a
housing
crisis,
and
so
the
failure
is
our
inability
to
continue
a
robust,
affordable
housing
program.
F
Okay,
so
Samir.
The
discussion
today
is:
everybody
is
agreed
that
we
need
to
do
the
affordable
homes,
and
we
have.
One
of
those
sources
is
measured
refunds,
the
second
one
which
most
of
us
have
heard
that
we
need
to
do
something
even
quicker
for
the
people
who
are
do
not
have
shelter
having
an
uncomfortable
house.
F
B
Yeah,
so
thank
you
councilor.
We
we
are
on
the
second
go
round.
We
are.
We
are
at
five
minutes.
Okay,.
F
So
we're
trying
to
do
two
things
here:
the
we're
trying
to
improve
our
pipeline
for
affordable
homes
through
expedited
price
processes
and
streamline
funding.
Arrangements
I
have
written
in
my
memo
both
of
those
items.
They
do
not
have
an
implication
to
the
budget
this
year,
but
they
both
have
a
work
item
to
be
done
by
their
housing,
which
the
city
manager
has
already
agreed
that
they
will
be
done
in
Fall.
F
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
yeah.
It's
definitely
both.
We
also
have
a
commercial
linkage
fee.
That's
not
generating
a
whole
lot
of
Revenue
right
now,
though
I'm
hopeful
it
will
kick
back
in
and
even
when
it
does
I
think
we
will
need
many
more
sources
of
revenue,
given
the
magnitude
of
the
housing
shortage,
but
I
very
much
appreciate
your
point
that
it
is
both
and
the
plans
all
the
plans
up
here.
Have
both
the
question
is
the
ratio
in
this
moment?
F
F
My
memo
mail
I
have
two
items
which
do
not
have
a
budget
implication
for
23
24,
but
they
accelerate
the
affordable
home
pipeline.
Could
you
take
that
as
a
friendly
amendment
to
your
motion
of
measured
e-reallocation.
B
F
BU
B
B
B
B
B
C
I
was
not
clear
on
that,
so
thank
you.
Jimenez
no
Torres.
D
BQ
AK
AH
BQ
AE
B
Okay,
councilor
Cohen.
BQ
All
right,
thank
you.
First
of
all,
yeah
councilmember
Davis,
you
are
speaking
a
lot.
You
probably
are
like
me
old
enough
to
remember
the
F
Hutton
commercial,
because
so
when
you,
when
you
talk,
people
do
listen.
So
we
appreciate
that
so
I
appreciate
your
your
motion.
I
appreciate
all
the
thoughtful
I
think
all
of
the
thoughtful
goals
in
the
memo
of
of
collaboration
collaborating
with
others
working
to
try
to
find
funding.
BQ
We
may
even
want
to
have
some
action
to
come
back
and
reevaluate
how
we're
allocating
things
going
on
in
the
future.
Depending
on
how
successful
other
sources
of
funding
are.
I
did
sign
on
a
letter
through
the
league
of
cities
this
year
for
a
for
a
something
that
was
being
brought
up
by
one
of
the
senators
in
the
state.
BQ
It's
been
a
month
now
and
I
can't
remember
which
Senator,
but
it
was
to
provide
three
billion
dollars
for
homeless,
to
cities
for
their
homeless
work,
so
we're
hoping
that
that
gets
in
the
budget.
We're
still
waiting
to
see.
So
there
are
potentially
other
sources
out
there
and
we're
hoping
some
of
them
will
come
forward.
But
my
intention
right
now
is
to
make
sure
we
have
committed
what
we
need
in
order
to
be
successful.
BQ
So
I
will
ask
you
one
more
time,
Jim
to
put
up
slide
one
as
I
make
a
ask
for
a
friendly
Amendment
to
the
motion
that
that
was
brought
up
before
and
I.
Think
I
I
believe
we
can
get
to
eight
votes
on
this
I
think
we
can.
You
know
as
long
as
the
amendment
is
amenable
to
you,
that
we'll
bring
everybody
together
and
at
least
get
eight,
so
we
can
move
forward.
BQ
BQ
So
before
we
talk
about
where
that
funding
will
come
from,
I
believe
it's
necessary
to
bring
the
program
Administration
line
to
the
6.8
million
dollars,
that's
about
4.3
million
and
then
the
remainder
of
the
12.7,
which
is
what
8.3
or
8.4
I
would
have
to
go
into,
would
go
into
the
line
just
above
it
to
bring
that
up
to
closer
to
20
to
29
million
dollars.
Now
it
was
called
to
our
attention
during
this
discussion,
and
you
brought
it
up
before
about
the
11
million
dollars
in
the
the
contingency
funding.
I.
BQ
Guess
that's
what
it's
called
the
or
the
inflation
Reserve,
so
I'm
FL
I'm
open
to
the
acceptance
of
your
friendly
of
a
friend,
my
friendly
amendment,
of
a
combination
to
12.7
million
that
comes
from
those
two
lines,
so,
whether
so,
a
portion
from
the
affordable
housing
and
a
portion
from
the
reflation
reserve.
Summing
up
to
12.7
million
dollars
with
4.3
going
to
the
pro
Administration
and
the
remainder
going
into
the
homeless,
support
programs
line.
So
I'm
asking
for
that
as
a
friendly
Amendment.
G
Thank
you,
so
I
have
heard
from
staff
that
we
can
put
the
I'm
going
to
read
it
out
for
for
Tony
we
can
put
4
324
941
dollars
from
the
inflation
Reserve
to
the
program
Administration
category
for
those
Staffing
positions.
G
And
then,
if,
if
we
could
just
do
round
numbers,
maybe
it'd
be
easier
to
take
from
the
the
mod
income
category
so
that
we
still
have
and
I'm
going
to
ask
staff
before
I
accept
the
second
part
of
that,
but
maybe
take
8
million
from
the
moderate
income.
So
that
would
leave
us
Rachel
with
4.7.
G
Would
we
still
be
able
to
to
meet
at
least
at
the
very
least
the
one
The
One
goal
of
the
acquisition
rehab
projects
it,
or
will
we
be
able
to
meet
all
three
of
the
goals
that
we
had
talked
about
earlier?
BP
Think
that
4.7
million
will
give
us
options
to
move
forward
with
the
the
discussion
we
had
about
the
priorities
for
that
category.
Okay,.
G
M
J
BO
So
all
the
funding
doesn't
have
to
come
from
that
one
category
for
the
moderate
income,
the
moderate
income
only
has
to
cover
if
we
had
like
a
20
unit
building,
we
found
out
two
of
the
units
had
moderate
income
people,
just
that
sliver
is
what
we
would
take
from
that
category
and
we
anticipate
you
know
on
most
of
these
that
they're
not
going
to
mostly
be
inhabited
by
moderate
income
people.
Okay,.
J
I
appreciate
sharing
that
information.
Sure.
B
B
AQ
B
Home
homeless,
Support,
Program,
shelter,
construction,
operation.
B
BN
B
And
just
to
confirm:
Jim,
there's
enough
in
the
moderate
income
category
to
only
have
to
do
that
from
one
from
prior
year
right,
there's
ten!
So
we
stay
under
the
threshold.
That
would
require
a
doubt:
two
votes
on
reallocating,
correct,
okay,
okay,
so
again,
this
would
take
a
two-thirds
vote
to
reallocate
I
do
see
Hands
Up
I,
usually
don't
I
usually
like
to
defer
to
folks
who
have
hands
up,
but
if,
if
anyone,
those
of
you
have
your
hands
up,
you're,
okay
with
me,
moving
forward
with
a
vote
here.
B
BE
BS
Just
to
clarify,
with
all
these
numbers
being
moved
around
I'd
love
to
see
a
new
spreadsheet
from
Jim,
but
I'm
sure
you
can't
do
that.
So.
BS
I
know
Cohen
could
so
just
so
that
moves
the
homeless
support
programs
from
the
21
million
in
the
Deva
Davis
memo
Etc
to
29
million.
Is
that
correct,
okay
and
it
leaves
in
the
mod
funding,
8
million
I,
mean
4.7
sorry
and
then
take
some
of
those
from
some
of
those
funds
from
the
inflation
Reserve
to
increase
the
program
Administration
to
the
6.8.
C
BT
C
D
C
Hi
Ortiz
Davis,
yes,
Dolan,
yes,
Candelas.
BC
AX
F
C
B
F
AE
C
Tim
passes
and
then
the
vote
on
the
motion
from
councilmember
Davis.
Second
number
Ortiz
as
amended
Jimenez,
yes,
Torres,
yes,
Cohen,
aye,
Ortiz,
aye,
Davis,
yes,
Dolan.
B
B
G
Thank
you,
I'll,
go
ahead
and
and
make
the
motion
so
I'll
move
the
the
mayor's
June
budget
message
with
the
addition
of
a
memo
written
by
myself,
council
member
Torres,
Ortiz,
batra
and
Dewan
items,
one
two
and
three,
and
then
a
memo
by
council
member
Torres
about
a
study
session
for
Arts
funding,
as
well
as
a
memo
from
council
member
candles.
W
G
We
have,
we
have
some
3.6
memos
as
well
and
I'm,
not
sure
if
we
need
to
move
I.
G
That's
3.6
just
want
to
make
sure
I'm
anything
that
talked
about
a
BD
I
put
in
this
motion.
AE
G
As
directed
staff
is
directed
to
consider
funding
through
the
general
fund,
ending
fund
balance
and
then
number
three.
Regarding
document
budget
document
number
50
direct
staff
to
utilize,
any
cost
Savings
in
funds
allocated
to
it
already
allocated
to
address
priority
Problem
one
to
address
priority
Problem
two.
G
The
city
manager
to
include
the
feasibility
of
new
Arts
funding.
When
surveying
voters
for
possible
future
Revenue
measures.
Since
we
often
do
that
in
the
fall,
we
thought
we
would.
The
council
member
Taurus
thought
to
do
that
now
and
then
I
did
add.
Council
member
candelas's
item
from
3.6
is
his
item.
Number
two
is
to
allocate
one-time
funding
of
fifty
thousand
dollars
from
the
neighborhood
business
districts
to
support
the
Tully
Road
Eastridge
Business
Association,
to
support
local
business
growth
and
development,
which
is
described
in
budget
document
number
28..
G
BP
AE
AE
B
G
Recommendations,
one
and
two
kind
of
go
together,
so
we
we
had
talked
with
Jim
Shannon
quite
extensively
and
we
said
yeah.
We
wanted
to
put
that
put
that
out
there
that
cdbg
funds
may
be
available
and
then,
if
not
to
come
back
to
us,
if
and
when
there
is
ending
fund
balance
about
the
possibility
of
funding
these
items
through
ending
fund
balance.
If
if
cdbg
falls
through
so
there
may
be,
there's
I
know
there's
more
information
now
than
when
we
wrote
the
memo,
but
I
think.
BN
Jim
right,
yeah
I
mean
I,
think
that
it
is
I,
think
the
Hoffman
base
in
conversation
with
the
housing
department,
the
Hoffman
via
VIA
Monte,
looks
like
it
would
be
an
eligible
project.
It
is
unlikely
that
the
requests
go
for
the
Vietnamese
Heritage
Community
Garden
and
Alum
Rock
Arts
districts
and
the
the
maintenance
Capital
repairs
for
the
African
American
Services
Center
would
probably
not
be
eligible.
G
And
so
we're
talking
about
small,
just
relatively
small
dollar
amounts
we're
not
talking
about
millions
of
dollars
like
we
were
in
measure
e,
just
to
be
clear
about
that,
so
the
African-American
Community
Center,
you
had
funded
mayor
and
your
message
about
half
of
the
they
need
all
new
windows
and
a
new
roof,
and
you
had
funded
half,
and
so
we
wanted
to
put
it
in
there
to
see
if
we
could
get
their
entire
Capital
project
done.
G
You
had
also
funded
about
half
of
the
Vietnamese
Vietnamese
Heritage
Community
Garden,
again
just
looking
for
all
the
funding
for
that
and
then
I
think
the
Alum
rocks
art,
Alum,
Rock,
Arts,
District
and
council
member
Ortiz
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
is
about
a
hundred
thousand
dollars.
Is
that
right
yeah?
G
So
so
we're
talking
about
relatively
small
amounts
and
just
wanted
to
sort
of
raise
those
so
that
if
cdbg
does
fall
through
which,
as
we
know
for
those
those
three
projects
is
probably
not
likely
to
to
be
able
to
happen
to
come
back
with
ending
fund
balance
to
to
fund
those
projects.
B
Given
that
those
are
unlikely
to
be
eligible,
what
would
be
the
total
I
am
a
little
nervous
about
the
precedent
of
us
starting
to
promise
ending
fund
balance.
We
I
think
appropriate
to
do
it
with
the
emergency
of
our
unhoused
neighbors,
but
to
start
doing
it
around
specific
BDS
that
we're
not
I
mean
again.
B
We
live
in
this
world
of
finite
resources
and
hard
trade-offs,
and
and
did
our
best
to
balance
that,
with
all
the
81
BDS
that
came
in
so
I'm
a
little
nervous
about
us,
creating
a
precedent,
given
that
those
three
are
unlikely
to
be
fundable
through
cdbg
dollars.
What
would
be
the
the
tax
on
the
general
fund?
The
ending
fund
balance.
BN
So
Bonnie
duonger
assistant
budget
director
is
keeping
my
head
on
straight
over
over
over
here.
So
the
the
total
of
those
three
will
be
716,
but
I
think
we
already
funded
sort
of
about
60,
000,
I,
think
of
the
African-American
Community
Services
Agency.
BA
BA
BN
B
G
G
B
That
wasn't
clear
to
me
in
the
direction
of
the
staff
being
directed
to
consider,
but
I'd
say
so.
This
would
You're
simply
asking
that
that
basically
be
agenda
is
to
come
back
to
us
if
they're,
if
they
can't
be
funded,
which
we
think
is
likely
the
case
correct,
so
those
would
be
coming
back
in
when
does
that
come
back,
it.
B
Okay
in
the
in
the
interim,
just
to
clarify
what
the
maker
of
the
motion
councilor
Davis.
Would
you
like
to
see?
I
hope
you
would
like
to
see,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
we're
on
the
same
page.
What
is
in
the
June
message
funded,
so
the
portion
of
the
Vietnamese
Heritage
Garden
and
the
dollars
to
repair
the
roof
at
the
African-American
community
service
center
funded.
AW
B
Okay,
I
have
a
few
more
questions,
but
I
don't
want
to
Monopoly
I
want
to
turn
to
colleagues
who
have
questions
and
then
I
may
jump
back
in
council
member
Jimenez
I.
Had
you
next
yeah.
D
Thank
you
a
question
about
the
similar
memo,
but
specifically
around
councilman
robot.
That
I
was
a
request.
I
think
it's
budget
document
50
talks
about
the
optimum
viamanta
safety
lighting,
I,
have
budget
document,
50
pulled
up,
I'm,
trying
to
follow
it,
and
so
what
I'm
curious
it's
close
to
a
million
dollars
if
it
all
sort
of
shakes
out
and
and
we
actually
do
change
some
of
the
lighting.
So
I
wanted
to
better
understand.
D
I
guess:
I
have
many
questions
so
so,
and
I'm
not
sure
who
up
Jim
I,
don't
know
I,
assume
I'm
talking
to
you
or
I,
don't
know
who
I'm
directing
these
two,
but
maybe
maybe
if,
if
Matt,
Lesh
or
new
Public
Works
director
is
here,
maybe
he
can
because
I
think
they
might
have
given
the
Public
Works
might
have
given
the
might
have
given
the
the
numbers
here
and
so
and
so
the
way
and
councilmember
I
I
know
you're
there
and
alone
and
and
if
you
have
any
thoughts
as
I
go
through
and
ask
some
questions.
D
Yeah,
so
so
so,
for
example,
the
way
you
have
this
budget
document
written
it
says
it
breaks
it
down
a
different
priority
problems,
if
you
will
one
of
them
as
an
example,
is
Carl's
back
and
by
the
way.
This
is
all
good
idea,
I'm
just
thinking
about
the
money,
because
there's
many
things
that
obviously
I
I
want
funded
as
well,
but
I
didn't
ask
for
a
million
I,
didn't
think
to
ask
for
a
million
dollars.
D
So
you
beat
me
to
the
punch
next
time.
I'm
gonna
do
that,
but
Carlsbad
drive.
It
says
there
are
some
street
lights.
Currently,
however,
beautiful
mature
Street
trees
prevent
the
light
from
throwing
sufficiently
light
to
Street.
You
know
to
light
the
street
well,
which
makes
sense
and
and
I
think
it
says
the
solution
to
that
is
lamp,
fixture
changes
and
relocation
of
three
existing
street
lights.
I
guess
in
my
mind
it
wouldn't
be
just
cutting
back
the
trees
and
letting
them
sort
of
the
the
light
shine.
F
Yeah
this
one
okay.
So
when
you
talk
about
a
million
dollars,
there
are
three
pieces
of
the
project
we
broke
it
down
to
not
knowing
how
much
money
we
have
available.
Ideally,
we
want
to
do
all
of
those
three
yeah
and
number
one.
Is
the
street
light
to
be
put
on
there
and
then
second
is:
if
we
have
the
money,
we
do
the
second
one
and
then,
if
you
have
the
money,
the
third
one,
so
this
area
is
pretty
dark
and
it's
a
senior
homes
right
there
right.
D
AE
F
Bd
was
accepted
for
150,
okay,
so
the
remainder
of
the
stuff
is
here
to
see
if
the
block
grants
are
available
for
that,
and
according
to
you
just
heard
from
Jim
that
this
is
likely
to
be
because
of
its
location,
that
it
would
be
available
under
the
infrastructure
Grant.
So
whatever
Grant,
we
are
able
to
get
like
to
get
more.
Those
done.
AE
D
And
so
councilmember
about
that
I'm
going
to
call
up
Maddie
he's
hanging
out
here,
one
I
know
obviously
there's
a
lot
of
BDS.
Are
you
familiar
with
the
speedies
that
sound.
BV
The
design
it's
your
initial
question
was
about
the
trees.
BV
Typically,
when
we
approach
something
like
this,
we
look
at
the
overall
and
see
what
lighting
standards
are
we
missing
if
there
is
a
chance
that
tree
limbs
are
the
actual
problem
or
if
it
is
light
placement
you
know.
So
this
is
a
moderate
project,
a
pretty
small
project
in
our
eyes
and
kind
of
moving
some
lights
around
to
create
that
more
lighted
area
as
opposed
to
trimming
the
trees,
as
was
requested.
BV
D
F
Yeah
it's
despite
it's
a
side,
sting
where
it
is
cities.
D
All
right,
because
the
end,
the
the
the
I
think
page
two
second
or
the
last
page,
it
says
funding
source,
essential,
Services,
Reserve.
So
the
broader
question
for
anyone,
but
so
how
do
you?
How
do
we
approach,
maybe
for
Jim?
How
do
we
approach
funding
this
I
mean
so
we're
approving
this?
Obviously,
today's
the
day
this
goes
forward.
Yes,
do
this:
how
do
we,
how
do
we?
How
do
you
approach
this
so.
BN
Where
are
you
going
to
get
money
from
so
I
think
so
for
the
for
the
Hoffman
vmanta,
which
will
likely
be
cdbg
funded?
So
there's
a
process
that
you
know
a
staff
will
have
to
engage
with
the
housing
department
going
through
sort
of
a
more
rigorous
process
to
sort
of
it
takes
a
little
bit
longer
to
access
that
that
that
funding,
so
so
that'll
take
its
time
a
little
bit
for
the
other
pieces.
BN
So
as
we
go
forward
as
part
of
the
annual
report
process,
you
know
we're
going
through
a
lot
of
cleaning
and
everything,
and
so,
although
to
the
extent
that
there
is
additional
general
fund
ending
fund
balance
on
the
the
table,
you
know
one
of
the
first
calls
after
we
fix
our
problems,
and
you
know
whatever
little
tweaks
we
have
to
do,
it
would
be.
D
F
It's
good!
We
understood
it.
I
think
Jim
and
Matt
did
a
great
job
of
explaining
what
would
happen
and
I
think
it's
good
for
all
of
us
to
be
on
the
same
page
where
our
money
is
going
or.
AE
D
B
BR
Thank
you
so
much.
You
know
when
we're
looking
at
what
we're
going
to
fund
and
what
we're
not
going
to
fund
I
think
that
sometimes
you
know
there
are
real
trade-offs
and
you
know
I'm
going
to
ask
the
maker
of
the
motion
if
they
would
be
willing
to
take
out
the
the
bien
Ortiz
batra.
BR
The
memo
that
has
the
the
lighting
and
and
those
items
I
think
that
in
this
budget
it
was
very
clear
to
me
that
we
made
a
decision
as
an
Administration
not
to
continue
some
of
the
food.
BR
Some
of
the
other
services
and
I
think
that
you
know
the
the
process
in
terms
of
having
all
of
the
BDS
go
through
their
their
regular
process
has
gone
through,
and
so
my
question
really
is:
if
this,
if
these
get
all
funded,
what
are
the
things
that
we're
not
going
to
do
right
because
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we're
going
to
have
a
balanced
budget?
BR
BR
I'll
know
more
for
next
year,
so
you
know
it's
it's
sort
of
a
situation
where
these
additional
things
are
coming
through,
and
you
know
I
I
applaud
my
my
fellow
council
members,
who
want
to
do
the
the
most
and
the
best
for
your
District,
but
I
also
think
that
that
if
this
gets
done,
what
other
things
don't
get
done,
because
there's
a
lot
of
items
that
that
did
not
get
done
and-
and
you
know,
a
decision
was
made,
for
example,
to
reduce
the
amount
of
of
money.
BR
That's
used
for
food
and
other
things,
things
that
were
done
during
the
the
the
pandemic
and
I
understand
that
that
was
all
one-time
dollars.
But
it
is,
it
is
a
trade-off.
So
that's
one
of
the
things
that
I
would
that
I
would
ask
if,
if
you're
willing
to
just
take
this
portion
out,
everything
else
is
over
okay.
But
just
this
portion
out
of
your
emotion.
F
F
G
Before
I
before
I
answer
that
I'd
like
Jim,
to
answer
your
question
yeah,
thank
you.
BR
BR
BN
So
thank
you
for
for
that
that
question,
so
what
we
would
be
doing
as
part
of
the
annual
report
process,
we
have
figuring
out
how
much
general
fund
ending
fund
balance
is
unavailable
and
uncommitted
after
we've
done
the
year-end
fixes.
BN
There
is
a
policy
by
which
that
ending
fund
balance
is
allocated
to
city
council
policy
also
baked
into
1-8-818.
That
looks
at
first.
Have
we
satisfied
the
next
year's
future
deficit
Reserve?
BN
So,
to
the
extent
that
these
these
items
would
get
funded,
they
would
fall
under
sort
of,
because
council
is
directing
it.
It
would
be
in
the
Urgent
category
need,
and
so
it
would
be
anything
that
any
fund
balance
would
have
otherwise
covered,
which
we
otherwise
would
have
been
into
the
because
I
think
how
interpreting
Council
direction
is
that
the
emergency
interim
housing
has
the
first
call
on
it,
and
so,
if
we
don't
get
to
that
15
million
dollars,
then
that's
it.
These
projects
wouldn't
get
funded.
BN
If
there's
more
than
the
15
million
dollars
that
are
available,
then
then
Theory
directly,
then
the
trade-off
would
would
be.
You
could
put
that
money
towards
the
budget.
Stabilization
Reserve.
You
could
put
that
money
toward
other
deferred
capital
projects,
so
those
would
be
some
of
the
options
that
would
be.
It
would
only
be
for
one-time
funded
items.
So
what
council
policy
also
dictates
is
that
you
know
the
the
disposition
of
the
ending
fund
balance
isn't
for
new
ongoing,
going
positions
or
work.
It
would
be
for
other
one-time
projects.
G
So
I'm
gonna
decline
your
friendly
Amendment
and
see
what
happens.
BS
Thank
you.
I,
too,
share
the
concerns
about
adding
in
additional
funding
requests
not
approved
in
the
original
mayor's
June
budget
message.
BS
We
all
had
things
that
we
put
in
for
funding
and
we
didn't
receive
funding
on
and
I'm
a
little
concerned
that
if
we
start
throwing
in
additional
funds,
even
though
it's
a
small
amount
relative
to
our
overall
budget-
that
at
the
end
of
the
day
we're
going
to
increase
the
amount
of
spend
expenditures,
we
have
against
our
budget
without
funding
or
without
finding
a
an
opportunity
in
the
budget
to
save
funds
and
to
balance
our
budget.
So
can
I
go
back
to
the
item.
BS
The
three
the
budget
document
50
regarding
the
Carlsbad
drive
and
priority
and
Mesa
Drive,
I
I,
admit
I,
wasn't
paying
that
close
attention,
but
is
it
accurate?
Did
you
say
Matt
that
the
cdbg
funds
you're,
you
think,
see
or
Jim?
Whoever
thinks
cdb
G
funds
will
work
for
that?
Is
that
right,
yeah
and
I
apologize
for
not
paying
closer
attention
to
that
I
was
trying
to
do
my
own
math.
B
BS
If
we
approve
these
and
they're
not
eligible,
then
we're
going
to
the
ending
fund
balance
and
we've
already
heard
that
the
or
we've
already
approved
that
the
ending
fund
balance
will
be
used
to
eia,
be
used
for
eihs,
so
I'm
concerned
that
we
we're
looking
at
this
ending
fund
balance
as
a
definitive
pot
of
money
that
we're
going
to
be
able
to
pull
from.
And
it's
it
isn't.
BS
It's
a
fund
that
we
have
every
year
based
on
what
funds
are
not
expended
in
the
prior
year
and
we
can't
there's
some
historical
numbers,
but
given
the
economy
and
inflation,
and
all
of
that
we
may
or
may
not
have
the
numbers
that
we're
talking
about
so
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
cons,
committing
our
funding
funding
balance
to
any
other
funds
under
eih
as
budget
director.
How
do
you
feel
about
these
numbers?
Jim.
BN
Well,
thank
you
for
that
question.
Just
to
clarify
you
earlier
earlier
question,
though
I
think
the
I
think
what
we
were
talking
to
house
and
we
were
looking
really
more
at
the
at
the
the
the
Carlsbad
Drive
area,
the
190
000
figure
for
the
Hoffman
I,
don't
know
if
the
other
locations,
because
it's
very
location
specific
as
to
where
cdbg
can
be
used.
So
we'd
have
to
look
at
that
more
more
closely.
So
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
I
might
have
misspoke
earlier.
BN
The
you
know,
I
think
is
you
know
the
the
administration
does
not
recommend
as
general
practice
to
budget.
You
know
projects
part
of
this
process
in
as
into
the
end
report.
It's
just
something
that
is
not
something
that
we
would
recommend.
Council
can
certainly
do
it
and
it
has
been
done
in
in
the
past
it
it
it's
nothing
more
to
say
than
that.
Really
we
try
to
have
as
much
as
we
can.
BN
We've
always
tried
just
to
steer
Council
to
have
the
trade-off
discussions
as
part
of
the
next
year's
in
in
budgetary
Investments
as
part
of
the
proposed
budget
process,
and
so
that's
always
been
what
our
recommendation
is.
There
have
been
exceptions
to
this
rule
over
the
over
the
years,
of
course,
but
that's
what
our
recommendation
generally
is.
BS
Thank
you
I
appreciate
that
we're
words
of
wisdom
from
our
budget
director.
The
trade-off
is
really
important,
and
and
because
of
that
I
I
can't
support
the
funding
unless
we
can
definitely
get
cdbg
funding,
otherwise
I
think
it
puts
our
ending
fund
balance
in
Jeopardy
and
that's
very
concern
to
me.
So
the
other
item
is
item
two,
where
a
I
do
read
that
it
is.
Staff
is
directed
to
consider
funding
but
council
member
Davis.
Would
you
include
a
friendly
amendment
to
bring
back
to
council?
BS
Yes
to
be
really
specific
about
that
and
and
to
a
friendly
Amendment?
Well,
I'll.
Try
what
count!
What
vice
mayor
tried
is
to.
BS
BS
G
Would
rather
have
your
first
amendment,
which
is
to
just
add
an
item
to
staff,
is
directed
to
consider
funding
through
the
general
fund,
ending
fund
balance
and
return
to
council
with
these
items,
so
that
would
be
returning
to
council
only
if
these
amount,
these
items
cannot
come
through,
cdbg
I
think
they
come
to
through
cdbg
anyway
for
Council
I.
Don't
think
that
requires
Direction,
but
I
could
be
wrong
about
that.
BU
Can
I
just
clarify,
please
sure?
So
if
when
we
do
the
annual
report,
which
we
release
at
the
end
of
September,
it's
heard
by
the
council
mid-october
with
this
direction,
and
if
there
is
available
fund
balance,
we
would
be
bringing
this
back
to
you
for
appropriation.
So
it
would
if
there
was
the
way
that
that
we
would
be
interpreting
this
direction.
It
says
directed
to
consider
funding
to
the
general
fund,
anything
from
balance.
BU
So
if
there
is
any
fund
balance
available,
the
way
that
this
direction
is
written,
we
would
be
then
recommending
the
projects,
if
there's
any
any
fun
balance,
and
then
Council
would
be
discussing
if
they
want
to
accept
that
recommendation
or
not.
But
that's
that's
how
it
would
come
forward.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
is
clear.
BS
Yeah,
yes
I.
Just
thank
you
for
that.
Sorry,
maybe
to
make
me
feel
more
comfortable
in
this
include
in
item
two
staff
is
directed
to
consider
funding
through
the
general
fund
balance
and
bring
back
to
council
with
any
other
funding
opportunities.
BS
G
B
So
it
comes
for
Taurus,
I
do
and
I'm
going
to
come
to
you
shortly.
I
do
want
to
just
confirm
Jennifer
others
in
the
administration
just
make
sure
we're
all
clear
on
that
interpretation.
So
what
now
with
the
modification?
What
would
you
be?
Bringing
back
in
October
you'll
tell
us
what
the
ending
fund
balance
is
and
I
assume
we'll
have
some
sort
of
menu
of
options
with
these
on
them.
This
these
items
on
that
menu.
BN
Correct
yeah,
so
we
would
come
forward
with
the
ending
fund
balance
if
there
was
additional
ending
fund
balance
available
beyond
what
was
directed
to
put
for
interim
interim
housing.
These
items
would
be
considered.
This
would
be
recommended
for
the
general
fund
any
fund
balance
if
there
were
no
other
eligible
sources
that
we
could
recommend
to
fund
these
projects,
and
so
that
would
be
how
we
would
approach
that
along.
B
BN
Yes,
yes,
yeah,
correct,
correct,
but
yeah
and
just
to
clarify
you
know
when
we
make
we,
there
are
a
number
of
adjustments
as
part
of
the
annual
report.
Those
are
more
technical
in
nature.
To
fix
you
know,
errors
or
just
adjust
with
you
know,
brand
new
in
information.
The
administration
does
not
really
bring
back
generally
very
limited
exceptions,
new
things
to
fund,
and
so
this
would
be
just
one
of
those
items
after
we
had
done
made
those
Corrections.
This
would
be
one.
B
N
Yeah
as
someone
who
someone
who
was
an
executive
director
for
a
hunger
organization,
I
was
I've
gotten
a
plenty
emails
from
you
know
our
activists
or
executive
directors
from
other
hunger
organizations,
Jim
and
I.
N
Just
to
be
transparent,
and
obviously
let
folks
know,
especially
those
who
are
listening,
can
you
can
you
just
explain
to
us
why
we,
you
know
we
we
didn't
include
monies
for
you
know,
for
the
programs
like
fishes
and
loafs
and
and
other
organizations
who,
who
were
a
little
were
a
little
bit
upset
that
we
don't
have
funding
for
that.
BN
So
when,
with
the
adoption
of
the
2223
operating
budget,
we
had
reality,
we
had
allocated
the
remaining
uncommitted
sort
of
American
Rescue
plan
or
the
the
remaining
unallocated
American
Rescue
plan
funds,
there's
around
50
million
50
million
dollars
as
part
of
that
Council
had
made
the
direction
to
continue
funding
our
food
food
partners
for
a
period
of
the
the
first
quarter
of
22
2023.,
and
so
you
know
just
based
on
what
the
activity
levels
were
going
on
and
what
their
Partners
were
able
to
to
do.
BN
I
think
we
were
able
to
stretch
that
out
through
almost
all
of
the
fiscal
year,
and
so
it
was
not
a
large
sum
in
22
2023,
but
we
were
able
to
extend
that
out
through
the
remainder
of
the
year,
so
sort
of
based
on
prior
Council
directions.
Sort
of
you
know
just
for
the
city
to
step
out
of
its
temporary
support
for
food
and
Necessities
distribution.
That
program
was
not
recommended
to
extend
because
of
that
prior
Council
Direction.
N
And
I
think
you
mentioned
it,
or
there
was
a
little
few
things
going
on
over
here
on
my
right
tower.
I
was
a
little
bit
distracted,
but
those
the
the
money
that
we
use
to
feed.
Folks
with
these
you
know
providing
it
to
our
Service
Partners,
who
who
eradicate
hunger.
It
was
mostly
ARP
manage
ARP
monies,
which
is
which
are
now
officially
gone,
yeah.
BN
B
Thanks,
council
member
just
a
question
on
the
Candelas
memo,
so
I
believe
customer
Davis
moved
the
wreck
number
two,
not
the
first
wreck,
because
we're
going
to
take
up
the
first
track
next
and
then
now
that
we're
all
here
in
a
public
meeting
we
can
discuss,
we
had
not
moved
that
one
as
part
of
the
June
message,
because
we
believe
from
OED
that
there
was
already
a
plan
to
fund.
Most
of
that,
so
I
wanted
to
just
understand:
I
think
it
was
30,
000.
B
and
I
think
we
had
some
questions
about
exactly
what
the
dollars
would
go
to,
but
I
I
guess.
My
main
question
is
number
one
on
rec2.
How
much
of
that
is
OED
already
planning
to
do
number
two?
Where
would
these?
Where
would
the
balance?
Presumably
20
000
come
from
because
it's
not
it's
not
quite
clear
and
I
mean
which
pot
of
money
that's
coming
out
of
blogging?
Can
you
help
us
understand.
BW
BW
Thanks
mayor
good
afternoon,
blog
is
all
deputy
director
for
economic
development.
BW
So,
yes,
obviously,
with
the
council's
blessing,
we
will
move
forward
to
fund
some
of
our
neighborhood
business
districts
and
what
we
found
during
the
pandemic
was
actually
the
business
or
the
businesses
that
fared
the
best
were
ones
that
did
have
organized
business
associations
in
their
neighborhoods.
So
we've
really
made
this
concerted
effort.
Our
intention
was
to
basically
fund
about
11
organizations,
so
11
business
associations
across
seven
council
districts.
B
BW
BW
I
was
just
going
to
say
that
has
to
do
mainly
with
the
the
organizations
that
are
receiving
a
higher
amount
of
funding.
Our
intended
higher
amount
of
funding
are
the
ones
that
we
have
more
recently
stood
up
so.
B
BW
AZ
B
Right
so
I
just
I
wanted
to
note
that,
because
I
very
much
support
the
work,
that's
being
done
there,
but
know
that
there's
kind
of
a
broader
plan
from
OED
around
11
different
business
districts.
So
then
the
follow-up
question
is
if
we
were
to
go
with
the
full
amount
in
the
BD.
The
the
50
we'd
have
to
trade
that
off
against
something.
So
what
would
be
the
explicit
trade-off
there
is
that
less
for.
B
I
would
think
my
colleagues
would
probably
want
to
know
which
district
that
would
be
coming
out
of
if
we
went
to
the
full
50.
if
you're
I
don't
know,
if
you're
able
to
answer
that.
But
again
back
to
the
theme
of
you
know
not
trying
to
pick
on
anybody.
But
just
we've
got
like
they're,
just
there's
a
fundamental
trade-off
here,
and
so
we've
got
at
least
30
committed
already.
B
E
You
mayor
yeah
go
ahead,
so
no
I,
appreciate
that,
and,
and
and
I
appreciate,
staff's
work
on
this
with
with
my
staff,
given
the
disproportionate
impact
that
the
pandemic
had
on
the
95122
zip
code
and
the
disparate
effect
it
had
on
the
business
corridors
and
the
largely
monolingual
businesses
in
the
in
the
district
who
are
largely
Vietnamese
speaking
businesses.
It
was
that
it
was
that
rationale
that
that
called
for
you
know
in
conversations
with
staff.
E
You
know
the
the
need:
that's
that's
disparate,
compared
to
other
other
areas
of
the
district
and
the
largely
new
nature
of
this
of
this
Association.
To
ensure
that
you
know
these
businesses,
who
have
largely
been,
you,
know,
disenfranchised
because
correct
me,
if
I'm
wrong,
but
there's
not
too
many
district,
eight
neighborhood
business
districts.
E
So
this
is
this
is
the
opportunity
to
continue
that
investment
and
that
commitment
for
from
the
city,
based
on
on
the
need
and
based
on
on
on
what
what
the
community
is
is
is
reiterated
to
to
my
office
and
your
office
as
well.
Yeah.
B
Thanks
councilman
and
again,
I
think
the
work's
super
important
I've
been
out
and
met
with
them
as
well
and
I
appreciate
your
strong
support.
So
one
is,
if
we
do
go
for
the
full
50
we'd
want
to
modify
the
wreck
to
just
be
adding
20,
because
the
plan
already
and
again
there's
like
81
budget
docs
and
all
the
rest.
So
we
didn't
have
the
chance
to
all
11
of
us
get
to
the
bottom
of
each
of
these.
But
there
is
30
000
already
planned
in
the
OED
plan.
I
still
would
say.
B
BW
I
guess
what
I
would
say
is
it's
likely
that
we
would
probably
reduce
some
funding.
You
know
try
to
reduce
the
smallest
amount
of
funding
from
probably
four
organizations
kind
of
the
next
four
that
we're
receiving
I
wouldn't
take
funding
away
from
the
folks
that
are
receiving
ten
thousand
dollars,
but
maybe
we're
in
the
25
and
30
000.
You
know
that
can
go
to
twenty
and
twenty
five
thousand.
B
I
know
we
generally
try
not
to
right
nitpick
when
you
have
kind
of
an
overall
program
with
a
lot
of
different
neighborhoods
involved.
I
do
appreciate
councilman
candela's,
advocating
for
a
great
Business
Association
a
nascent
Business
Association
in
his
district.
B
Do
you
want
to
express
any
other
thoughts
on
just
kind
of
the
overall
program?
Do
you
have
any
other
thoughts
or
feelings
about
rec2?
If
we
push
for
the
additional
funding
there.
BW
You
know
I
think
we
we
want
to
provide
as
much
support
as
we
possibly
can
to
the
neighborhood
business
districts
that
we
are
trying
to
stand
up
and
get
to
a
part
where
they're
self-sustainable,
given
the
resources
that
we
have.
So
we
we
kind
of
felt
like
looking
at
where
those
organizations
are
some
of
them
it.
Quite
honestly,
it
might
be
that
a
few
of
the
organizations
take
a
little
bit
longer
to
stand
up
and
maybe
won't
be
in
a
position
to
receive
all
of
that
funding
in
the
next
fiscal
year.
BW
So
we
can
make
adjustments.
Maybe
there's
an
opportunity
to
look
at
an
up
to
number
that
that
might
be
something
so
minimum
of
30,
but
you
know
potentially
additional
funding
if
those.
B
E
And
to
the
point
this
is,
this
is
largely
unallocated
money
from
previous
years
that
has
been
rolled
over,
and
so
this
is
a
one-time
allocation
and
and
by
no
means
am
I,
advocating
that
this
be
a
continuous
appropriation.
You
know
based
on
trade-offs,
as
you
mentioned
mayor,
so
you
know,
I
I
would
be
amenable
to
that,
but
I
do
want
to
I,
do
want
to
emphasize
the
the
the
the
disparity
and
the
inequity
that
exists
within
you
know
within
the
this
specific
Community,
because
they
have
been
disproportionately
impacted
and
that's
that's.
E
The
whole
reason
why
I'm
advocating
up
here
and
saying
that,
but
I
I
would
I
would
caution
not
to
not
not
to
not
to
shy
away
from,
but
I
appreciate
your
your
comments,
but.
P
E
Know
I
would
go.
I
would
be
open
to
to
amending
my
my
my
recommendation
to
up
to
50
000..
Thank
you.
Okay,.
G
So,
just
to
be
clear,
we're
we're
allocating
30
000
up
to
fifty
thousand,
so
we'll
we'll
make
a
floor
of
the
30
and
then
say.
G
B
B
I
I
just
wanted
before
we
vote.
Take
the
opportunity
to
really
sincerely
thank
everyone.
Once
again.
I
know
we
still
have
fees
and
charges
and
the
overall
budget,
but
I
appreciate
particularly
Stephen
Keynes
on
my
team
and
Mackenzie
Mossing
and
the
rest
of
our
policy
team
and
everyone
who
worked
incredibly
hard,
starting
back
in
late
January,
February,
worked
hand
and
glove
with
with
Jim
Shannon
and
St
manager's
budget
office
to
bring
forward
the
the
budget
that
we're
voting
on.
B
So
we
are
currently
on
item
3.4,
which
we
heard
together
with
3.5
I.
Just
I
know.
There's
been
a
lot
of
steps
here
today
and
it's
been
a
long
conversation
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
on
the
same
page.
So
this
is
the
June
message
which
includes
all
the
BDS
and
mbas
and
again
Stephen
Keynes
and
everybody
on
my
team.
B
Thank
you
for
many
sleepless
nights
for
getting
helping
me
get
that
together
and
get
it
out
and
really
work
closely
within
our
budget
Brown
act,
but
also
take
very
seriously
and
track
down
every
thread
we
could
from
all
81
budget
docs
that
came
in
some
I
think
11
million
dollars
or
something
like
that.
So
a
lot
of
great
work
and
I
hope.
My
colleagues
just
know
that
we
worked.
B
We
probably
didn't
get
it
perfectly,
but
we
worked
very
hard
to
thoroughly
investigate
all
81
of
your
budget
docs
and
incorporate
as
much
as
we
could
with
input
from
staff,
so
I
think
Tony.
You
may
want
to
restate
the
motion.
I
think
we
are
ready
to
vote,
but
just
to
make
sure
we're
cleared
you,
you
wrote
it
out
right.
B
C
Let
me
let
me
bump
up
the
font,
so
I
have
approving
The
Memo
from
Davis
Torres,
Ortiz,
batra
and
Dylan,
with
the
additional
language
in
red
to
report
back
to
Council
on
items
on
the
item
two
so
directed
to
consider
funding
through
the
general
fund,
ending
fund
balance
and
report
back
to
council
with
these
items
and
then
on
the
Candelas
memo
to
change
the
language,
to
allocate
one-time
funding
of
30
000
up
to
fifty
thousand
at
staff's
discretion
from
the
neighborhood
business
districts.
C
B
Items
the
so
this
was
wreck
one
Rec
one.
Yes
in
the
Davis
Torres
Ortiz
batra
memo
I
think
we
made
clear
that
we
did
tweak
that
direction,
so
they
will
still
be
coming
back
right
as
as
it
will
be
noted
as
and
if,
if
we
can't
fund
it
through
cdbg
funding,
it
would
be
part
of
a
menu
of
of
options.