►
From YouTube: JUN 13, 2023 | City Council Evening Session
Description
City of San José, California
City Council Evening Session, June 13, 2023
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be held at San José City Hall and also accessible via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=1088259&GUID=7CB8B65A-0BD3-466D-881E-489B69EF1D08
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
C
D
Good
evening,
mayor
and
Council
Anil
Babar
with
the
California
Apartment
Association
I'm
here
to
speak
on
the
fees
and
charges
issue,
but
more
specifically
the
increase
in
the
tenant
protection.
Ordinance
fees
are
charged
to
all
non-run
controlled
buildings
in
the
city.
The
fee
was
originally
set
to
be
thirty
four
dollars
this
year.
D
That
amount
is
just
unconscionable.
Obviously
the
program's
not
being
managed
properly
to
the
point
where
you
need
to
raise
these
fees,
double
digits
or
some
cases
triple
digits
every
year
to
make
it
pencil
I
want
to
also
add-
and
thankfully
accounts,
member
Deb
Davis
pointed
this
out
a
month
ago,
when
we
talked
about
this
last,
that
the
program's
actually
managing
fewer
units.
This
year,
approximately
30
fewer
units,
my
mouth's,
probably
a
little
off
and
is
still
going
up.
None
of
this
actually
makes
any
sense.
D
What
we
need
is
more
accountability
in
this
program.
We
need
caps
on
the
ways
the
fees
are
being
increased,
otherwise,
they'll
just
go
up
year
after
year,
because
this
program
is
clearly
seen
as
a
blank
check
for
the
housing
department
to
charge
whatever
they
want
and
charge
it
to
the
TPO
program.
We
need
an
audit
to
understand
where
the
money
is
going,
what
money
is
being
spent
on
and
we
need.
We
just
need
a
you
know.
A
cap
on
the
program
put
a
five
percent
cap
on
the
program.
D
E
E
Well
that
was
taken
from
us
and
in
these
Capital
budgets,
when
I
read
them,
I,
don't
see,
I,
don't
see
that
that
acknowledgment
or
amendment
being
reflected
back
to
me.
So
as
a
citizen
I
have
to
come
here,
it's
my
job
it
to
hold
you
to
account
for
that.
E
We're
gonna
get
there
when
I
don't
know,
but
we're
gonna
get
there
to
where
we
are
going
to
institutionalize
racial
equity,
and
it
is
going
to
be
reflected
in
every
single
budget.
Why?
Because
racism
literally
infected
every
single
area
of
my
existence
in
my
life
and
the
existence
of
Chicanos
for
Generations?
Thank
you.
C
F
Hi
there
you
can
hear
me.
Yes
thank
you
and
thank
you
mayor
and
council
members,
Council
Davis
and
Ortiz
I
believe
that
have
supported
the
funding
for
Med
30
for
the
fire
department,
a.
A
F
A
San
Jose
firefighter
as
well
when
I
applied
years
ago,
that
I
had
competed
against
approximately
4
000
applicants
for
the
position
of
a
firefighter
and
nowadays
we're
only
seeing
applications
of
around
50
with
the
last
hiring
process
of
only
17
applicants
that
had
a
interview
with
19
applicants
and
I'm,
not
sure
where
the
loss
of
interest
into
becoming
a
San
Jose
firefighter
has
been,
and
it's
a
long
road
ahead
of
us
before
we
can
start
bringing
up
our
numbers.
F
Paramedics
are
extremely
short
staffed
within
San
Jose,
mayor
Mayhem,
I
heard
you
earlier
indicate
about
workload
and
bringing
on
workload.
Well,
it's
bred
into
a
San
Jose
firefighter
to
take
on
what
we
can,
even
if
it's
beyond
what
we're
capable
of
and
that's
what
we're
doing.
If
we
cut
a
position
of
Med
30,
we
are
cutting
firefighters,
even
though
it's
been
proposed
that
we're
increasing
our
staffing
and
I
want
to
support.
Ask
for
your
support!
Thank
you.
B
Okay,
this
movie-
let's
see
any
colleagues
hands
here,
just
on
the
mid
30
topic.
Can
the
administration
give
us
a
little
bit
of
context?
I
know
this
dealt
with
and
I
believe
it
was.
The
final
MBA
was
that
six
I've
lost
count
was
that
60..
H
We
had
a
lot
and
we
had
a
lot
this
year
was
really
a
bear
Jim.
Could
you
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
our
recommendation
and
what
the
discussions
we've
had
further
had
with
the
fire
department,
given
the
concerns
that
some
of
the
council
members
had
brought
up
during
the
budget
study
sessions?
Yes,.
I
Yeah
for
for
sure,
Again,
Jim,
Shannon
City's
budget
director.
So
after
the
budget
study
sessions,
we
had
some
additional
conversation,
maybe
just
to
rewind
a
little
bit.
So
the
the
the
administration
had
put
forward
sort
of
the
elimination
of
the
fire.
Three
fire
captain
positions
to
have
that
work
reallocated
amongst
the
rest
of
the
fire
department
in
tandem
with
the
establishment
of
a
six
Battalion,
so
adding
three
Battalion
Chiefs,
and
so
the
administration
put
forward.
I
But,
as
you
know,
the
chief
had
in
indicated,
you
know
it
will
be
a
transition.
As
the
conversation
went
during
the
study
sessions
and
as
we
had
some
additional
conversations
with
the
fire
department,
they
had
recommended
that
it
would
make
some
some
sense
to
have
a
captain
on
standby
to
serve
as
a
department
infection
control
officer,
which
is
the
stickiest
piece
of
the
reallocation
of
the
med
30
duties.
I
And
so
what
we
have
is
part
of
MBA
60,
which
is
we
do
have
the
recommendation
to
take
some
project
savings
from
a
fire
Capital
project
for
125
000,
to
allow
for
the
standby
pay
of
of
the
department
infection
control
officer
to
be
able
to
assess
that
work
for
the
next
six
months
to
make
sure
that
the
transition
Works
appropriately-
and
we
will
continue
to
monitor
that
in
the
fire
department-
will
of
course
continue
to
monitor
that.
I
If
we
need
to
extend
that
or
recommend
further
adjustments,
we
would
certainly
bring
those
forward
to
the
council
for
for
their
consideration
to
make
to
make
sure
that
we're
maintaining
our
our
Public
Safety
duties.
But
so
that's
that's
kind
of
the
the
scope
of
the
conversation
and,
what's
in
the
various
mbas
and
NBA
60.,.
B
B
H
Would
if
we
needed
more
of
a
Runway,
we
would
recommend
additional
funding
at
that
time
and
we
would
commit
to
an
evaluation
of
it.
So
you,
you
could
have
all
the
information,
but
we
thought
that
was
a
prudent
way
to
address
some
of
the
concerns
that
we
heard
gives
the
chief
a
little
bit
more
leeway
in
that
transition
time
as
Jim
described.
B
Thank
you,
yeah.
That
does
seem
like
a
prudent
approach
and
I
I
will
say:
I
I'm
glad
that
we're
listening
and
being
responsive,
I'm
a
bit
concerned
about
the
cuts
that
have
been
proposed
in
the
group
memo
there.
So
at
least
currently
not
ready
to
support
that
or
the
ongoing
deficit
that
would
be
created
there.
On
the
other
group
memo
that
was
attached,
I
wanted
to
ask
on
the
license
fees.
So
this
is
recommendation.
One
dog
and
cat
license
fees
for
those
meeting.
Certain
income
eligibility
criteria.
B
So
I
appreciate
the
goal
here
and
likely
support
this,
but
I
just
want
folks.
I
just
want
the
numbers
to
be
transparent
as
always
what
what
is
the
revenue
the
city
receives
from
that
license
fee
and
roughly,
what
amount
of
that
do?
We
think
would
be
impacted
by
an
income
eligibility
criteria
that
that
basically
waived
the
fee
for
lower
income
residents,
which
I
think
is
a
is
a
good
goal.
I
I,
don't
so
the
the
budgeted
revenue
for
that
is
about
seventy
six
thousand
dollars
for
those
licenses,
the
amount
that
will
be
subject
to
what
the
the
potential
ordinance
is
seeking.
We
don't
know
what
that
figure
is
I
think
we
have
to
come
back
with
that.
Presumably
it
would
be
a
probably
a
substantially
smaller
figure
than
what
that
seventy
six
thousand
dollars
is.
I,
don't
know,
I,
don't
want
to
put
a
number
on
it,
but
I.
Imagine
it's
not
terribly
large.
Okay,.
B
So
the
ceiling
is
76
000,
but
it
still,
it
won't
even
be
that
much
right.
Okay,
that
seems
reasonable
to
me.
So
it's
something
I
would
support
as
we
get
to
rec
to
I,
just
I'm
a
little
nervous
about
the
sort
of
sweeping
language
here
of
a
comprehensive
review,
again
good
good
goal,
I
suppose
a
sentiment
but
I'm
a
little
worried
about
just
staff
workload.
I
know
we
did
during
I
think
it
was
the
what
was
the
March
message
or
during
the
bud.
Maybe
it
was
during
the
snow.
B
It's
during
the
study
session
on
fees
and
charges.
I
know
there
was
some
direction
given
to
the
administration
to
come
back
and
I
believe
help
us
better
understand
the
fees
and
charges
I
think
it
was
councilor,
Foley
or
maybe
vice
mayor,
maybe
both
who
spoke
to
that.
Can
we
just
can
this
be
folded
into
that
in
a
way
that
doesn't
cut
a
balloon
to
to
taking
away
from
other
critical
priorities?
Yes,.
H
I
think
that
would
be
a
a
great
way
to
go,
and
then
we
can
talk
about
because
I
think
we
need
to.
As
we
discussed
during
the
budget
study
sessions.
They're
ahead
to
my
recollection,
I've
been
here
a
long
time.
H
So
it's
plenty
of
time
for
the
budget
process,
but
if
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
doing
this
review
now
with
I'm,
not
sure
with
staff
resources,
because
it
would
be
a
big
lift
but
depending
what
council
Direction
came
out
of
that
study
session,
then
we
can
do
direction
to
all
of
the
Departments.
As
part
of
their
development
of
the
fusion
charges
for
the
following
fiscal
year,.
B
Okay,
that's
helpful,
and
that
would
be
early
next
year
would
be
the
timing
prior
to
the
March
message
and
the
kickoff
of
the
of
the
formal
budget
process
and
then
REC
3
would
certainly
be
relevant
to
recommendation
one,
and
are
you
comfortable
with
the
timing?
Is
the
administration
comfortable
with
the
timing
of
that.
I
I
think
that
is
comfortable,
but
I
totally
need
to
correct
an
error
that
I
just
made
earlier
when
I
was
referencing,
the
76
000
I
was
looking
at
the
adoption
category,
which
was
wrong.
Thank
you
for
Johnson
related
to
to
run
into
my
to
my
ear
so
that
that
proposed
for
the
license
fee
category,
that
is
a
1.9
million
dollar
figure.
So
quite.
I
Different
quite
a
bit,
so
thank
you
for
that
important
clarification,
good.
I
A
B
Okay,
okay,
so
I
see
I've
just
been
walking
through
this
to
get
more
context
for
us
as
a
group,
while
I
see
some
hands
have
gone
up
so
so
on
the
first
there
then
I'd
certainly
support
studying
that,
but
given
the
the
amount
of
Revenue
there
I'd
want
to
fully
understand,
impacts,
that's
then
tied
to
REC
3,
and
then
it
sounds
like
rec2
would
would
be
acceptable
would
make
sense
the
administration
if
we
were
to
fold
that
into
when
you
all
come
back
early
next
year
with
a
study
session
on
fees
and
charges
and
then
on
the
other
memo
I
think
I've
already
expressed
some
of
my
concerns
there.
J
Thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
go
back
to
what
was
referenced
by
the
representative
of
the
apartment
association
regarding
the
tenant
protection
ordinance
fee
and
I
know
that
one
of
the
things
that
could
possibly
happen
is
that
we
are
getting
a
new
housing
director
and
perhaps
an
assessment
of
of
the
fees
or
an
audit
of
the
fees
would
be
appropriate.
So
I
would
I
would
be
very
much
in
favor
of
having
staff.
J
Take
a
look
at
it
and,
as
a
new
person
comes
in,
might
be
an
appropriate
time
to
take
a
look
at
some
of
these
fees
to
see.
If
it's
you
know
operating
in
the
way
that
it
should.
H
H
No,
no,
no
Jim,
I
think
what
it
would
be
good
is
to
break
down.
What
are
the
costs
that
go
into
this
fee?
I
think
that
we
could
issue
some
of
information
memo,
an
MBA
or
something
that
actually
breaks
down.
What
makes
up
why
they're?
It's
it's!
You
know
whatever
you
know
per
unit
fee,
it's
going
to
be
next
year.
What
is
the
time
and
what?
What
are
the
activities
that
go
into
it?
I
think
it
needs
more
transparency,
so
people
understand
that,
and
so
we're
certainly
willing
to
do
that.
J
K
The
med
30
function
is
is
a
lot
more
than
just
being
infection
control.
I
I
know
that
the
fire
department
at
one
point
is
hire
a
civilian
as
a
infection
control
to
to
help
the
fire
department
in
EMS
vaccine
and
so
on.
They've
I
believe
they
already
have
that
position
Phil.
K
Why
would
we
need
to
have
that
125
000,
one
time
or
six
months
for
for
standby
captain
when
you
look
at
met,
30
is
considered
a
full-time
captain
on
every
single
shift
right
and
that
met
dirty
lots
of
time
arrive
on
scene
early,
assess
the
situation.
Sometimes
they'd
even
do
a
rescue,
they
do
triage,
they
do
infection
control,
they
we
punish
the
supplies
for
all
33
stations
and
many
many
other
function
and
I
think
it's
a
disservice
to
our
community.
K
I
Yeah
I
think,
if
we
like,
we
could
have
Chief
sap.
You
can
come
down
and
sort
of
answer
more
of
those
operational
questions.
Council
member.
L
L
Okay,
so
one
as
as
the
city
manager
said,
one
of
the
more
critical
functions
that
we
were
in
trying
to
ensure
would
be
covered
was
24
7,
availability
of
a
department
infection
control
officer
that
is
a
trained
skill
set,
and
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
someone
available
for
response
to
the
more
acute
cases,
my
direction
to
staff
as
we
contemplated.
This
change
was
to
ensure
that
All
Med
30
functions
were
covered
either
equally
or
better
than
we
were
providing
them
previously.
L
That
is
the
one
area
that
I
wanted
to
shore
up
with
certainty,
and
so
the
duties
and
responsibilities
overall
will
be
covered
and
there
will
be
continuity
of
those
services.
They
will
just
be
assigned
to
different
areas
of
the
field.
The
department
infection,
control
officer,
duties
that
cannot
be
covered
with
on-duty
Personnel
will
have
available
resources
by
way
of
standby.
That
means
a
certified
EMS
staff
officer
will
be
available
at
all
times
and,
as
you
said,
we
also
have
a
nurse
practitioner
that
is
trained
in
that
that
as
well.
K
L
K
I
forgot,
which
engine
company
was
it
said,
thank
God
for
met
30
that
was
there
or
else
would
have
been
in
deep
trouble.
It
told
me
that
we're
going
to
cut
staff
and
replace
with
something
else
and
I
think
if
we
look
at
the
importance
of
Med,
30s
and
personnel
and
met
during
what
the
service
to
their
communities
is
essential.
K
I
don't
understand.
Why
would
we
cut
the
position
just
to
say
we
replaced
within
infection
control
infection
control
officer?
Do
not
go
unseen,
do
not
assess,
do
not
go
in
and
assist,
do
not
call
in
for
resource
they're,
not
safety
officer
they're,
not
rehab,
they're,
not
triage.
Those
are
all
the
missing
function,
Chief
and
and
I'm.
Aware
of
it.
I
understand
that
that
your
position
is
trying
to
minimize
the
cost,
but
at
what
cost
at
the
the
cost
of
our
residence.
K
L
Well,
in
in
terms
of
the
the
field,
Response
Unit,
there's
two
proposals
that
are
separate:
one
is
the
battalion
chief,
the
addition
of
a
sixth
Battalion,
that's
three
individuals
or
one
on
duty
per
day
and
a
separate
proposal,
which
is
the
reduction
of
Med
30,
which
is
three
Captain
positions
per
day.
The
total
daily
Staffing
Remains
the
Same
right.
Now,
it's
190
on
duty
at
a
time,
so
there
there
is
in
fact
position
reductions
and
position
increases,
but
the
total
daily
Staffing
is
the
same.
K
So
the
total
is
daily
Staffing
is
still
according
to
our
stat
is
that
we
still
have
the
Staffing
as
of
2009.,
and
if
you
cut
position
of
met
30
and
you
put
in
the
battalion
chief,
the
battalion
chief
does
not
respond
to
all
medical
calls
or
infection
control
or
any
other
fire
out
there.
They
only
respond
within
the
battalion
am
I,
correct.
L
Well,
as
I
stated,
the
direction
to
staff
is
to
ensure
that
duties
and
responsibilities
of
mid-30
going
forward
will
be
equal
or
or
an
improved
status
from
what
they
are
today.
So
in
terms
of
of
who
will
take
on
those
functions.
We're
still
working
through
some
of
that,
but
I
I,
wouldn't
say
it's
correct
to
say
that
a
battalion
chief
only
responds
within
the
Battalion.
We
have,
despite
response
protocols
that
that
take
them
all
over
town
as
you're
aware
of.
K
L
I
have
not
heard
that
no
and
I
I
have
to
be
honest.
I
haven't
done
that.
K
L
K
You
made
your
Singularity
decision
without
having
involvement,
a
volume,
Battalion,
cheap
division,
Chief
well
Deputy
Chief
and
are
the
firefighter
and
then
it's
clearly
not
for
the
Departments
and
I,
and
then
I
ask
that
you
reconsider
your
thoughts
on
this,
and
maybe
we
should
pull
this
item
and
and
reconsider
to
other
options,
because,
as
of
right
now,
I
don't
think
you
can
get
any
firefighter
out
there
to
agree
to
your
plan
or
any
battalion
chief
for
that
matter
and
I
I.
Think
if
you
do
that
that
you're
doing
a
huge
disservice
to
our
community.
B
Thanks
council
member
councilor
Torres.
M
M
Local
230
is
on
Zoom
I,
don't
know
if
anybody
from
local
can
I
ask
local
230
a
question
for
I
mean
I
have
10
minutes.
You.
A
M
M
M
All
right,
then
well
I,
wait
for
Matt
Jim
I
have
just
a
couple
of
a
couple
of
questions
on
the
on
the
memo
that
was
signed
on
by
the
the
other
Brown
act.
Budget
Group
s,
the
other,
the
other
group,
so
the
the
the
the
question
is
to
Jim
is
is
the
the
the
vacancies
that
we
have
that
I
listed
from
MBA
21
I
just
want
I
just
want
to
make
sure
these
are
vacant
positions
right.
I
Correct
so
the
these
are
vacant
positions,
the
ones
that
are
listed
there-
the
accounts,
receivable
Staffing
Bureau
of
American
Medical
Services
and
the
I.T
Staffing.
Those
are
vacant
positions
right.
M
And
because,
because
we
had
hundreds
and
thousands
of
discussions
on
the
budget,
can
can
you
explain
to
us
number
three
again,
I
know
that
I
included
in
our
budget
and
I'm
trying
to
pull
up
my
notes,
but
I
can't
can
I
I
can't
find
it
so
can
you
explain
why
why
we
added
why
I
added
number
three
in
this
memo.
I
Yeah
so
I
think
what
the
the
direction
that
that
was
trying
to
be
achieved
here
was
to
be
able
to
to
get
to
that
total
of
about
one
1.2
million
million
dollars
to
restore
the
med
30
program,
and
so
one
of
the
reductions
that
you're
citing
here
is
the
general
sorry,
the
radio
Replacements,
which
is
a
reduction
of
500
000
on
a
one-time
basis.
Only
so
that's
the
only
item
that
is
in
your
list
here.
That
is
one
time
and
not
on
ongoing.
I
So
to
make
that
balance
out,
your
recommendation
is
to
reduce
the
future
deficit
Reserve,
which
only
has
ongoing
funding
allocated
to
it
in
the
proposed
budget
and
so
by
reducing
the
the
the
ongoing
future
deficit
Reserve.
So
taking
that
from
18.8
to
18.3
or
so
that
is
a
then
becomes
a
balanced
transaction
to
restore
the
med
30
program.
M
All
right
and
before
before
I
asked
the
other
question
for
for
Matt
and
I'm.
Sorry
before
I.
Go
on
to
the
next
memo
where
was
is
Staff?
Okay,
with
with
the
memo
online
with
information
outlined
here.
N
H
H
Just
I'll
just
just
jump
in
on
a
couple
of
points
as
we're
sort
of
talking
about
this.
You
know
we
obviously
put
on
put
in
good
faith
the
trade-off
memo,
so
there
could
be.
You
know,
choices
made
in
that
in
that
memo,
for
other
things
that
the
council
may
want
to
fund
the
the
reducing
the
future
deficit.
Reserve
automatically
puts
us
into
a
deficit
position
next
year
and
I
just
want
to
be
clear
on
that,
and
you
know
again.
This
is
up
to
council
decision
on
that.
That's
that's
the
piece.
H
While
we
did
not
obviously
recommend
this.
That
would
be
the
piece
that'd
be
the
most
concerning
would
be
the
500
000
reduction
to
the
given
our
uncertain
future
Economic
Times
I
also
just
want
to
say,
because
I
feel
like
compelled
to
say
we
do
rely
on
our
fire
chief,
although
we
do,
we
do
obviously
take
feedback
from
employees,
but
you
know
the
fire
chief
is
ultimately
accountable
for
the
operational
decisions
of
the
of
the
fire
department.
H
So
we
do
rely
on
him
and
I
have
to
tell
tell
all
that
our
fire
chief
is
really
outstanding,
and
probably
one
of
the
smartest
operational
Fire
Chiefs
we've
had
in
my
experience
in
32
years
and
so
I
just
want
to
I.
Do
trust
him
in
his
judgment
and
he
is
on
his
game.
I
just
want
to
give
everybody
that
reassurance
on
monitoring
and
especially
on
performance
on
a
and
giving
me
updates
on
a
regular
basis,
as
well
as
the
assistant
city
manager.
H
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you
all
have
that
assurance
that
I
do
think
we
have
one
of
the
finest
Fire
Chiefs,
probably
in
the
nation,
and
who
is
watching
the
operational
decisions
very
closely,
and
so
we
do
I
I
personally,
trust
him
very,
very
much
when
he's
making
recommendations
to
me.
Thank.
M
You
thank
you,
Matt.
Are
you
on.
M
The
question
was:
is
a
local
230?
What
is
local,
230
think
about
removing
met
30
from
next
year's.
O
You
know
we.
We
know
that
right
now,
that
we
need
both
at
six
Battalion
and
we
still
need
Med
30..
We
think
that
they're
very
important
positions.
We
think
that
it
only
enhances
our
emergency
response,
the
overseeing
the
day-to-day
operations
and,
ultimately
to
the
Met
30
position
directly
supports
our
paramedics,
24
7,
and
it's
three
people.
As
the
council
member
pointed
out
one
a
day,
that's
available
for
any
kind
of
emission
EMS
issues
that
come
up
so
we're
in
support
of
the
council
member's
memo
and
those
that
signed
up.
M
All
right
great,
thank
you
and
then
okay
and
then,
with
that
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
make
a
motion,
but
I
wanted
to
make
the
I
wanted
to
make
a
motion,
but
before
I
do
I
wanna,
because
I'm
squiggling
here
and
and
in
the
other
memo
fees
and
services
for
the
kitties
and
the
doggies,
because
I
don't
want
to
confuse
them.
Number
two
was
just
change
the
language
into
a
study
session.
Is
that
what
you
meant
said
mayor
well.
B
No
number
one
would
actually
given
that
we
we'd
be
talking
about
potentially
impacting
it
was
over
one
and
a
half
million
dollars
in
Revenue.
The
I
think
strong
suggestion
was
that
we
would
need
to
do
more
analysis
before
we
create
an
ordinance
to
exempt
those
fees
just
because
the
dollar
amount.
First,
we
thought
it
was
76
000
which
sounded
like
something
we
could
absorb,
so
the
the
recommendation
would
be
on
number
one
Rec,
one
two.
B
At
least
this
was
my
recommendation
study
that
analyzed
it
and
come
back
along
with
REC
3,
because
that
would
you
know
be
reflecting
that
exemption
and
then
on
the
rec
number,
two,
the
recommendation
from
the
administration,
at
least
as
I
understood
it
was
to
fold
that
into
the
study
session
we
would
be
having
on
just
better
understanding
all
of
our
fees
and
charges
all
right.
Those
were
the
recommended
modifications
from
the
administration.
As
I
understood
it.
Okay,.
M
So
then,
with
that
with
my
two
minutes,
left
I
make
a
motion
to
accept
item
3.6
approval
of
the
20
20
23
operating
capital
budget,
along
with
council
member
Mike,
myself
councilmember
Davis
Ortiz
Duan,
batres,
Med
30,
along
with
council
member
Ortiz
tourist
Don,
batra's
fees
and
bees,
and
for
the
kitties
and
the
doggies
with
the
language
that
the
mayor
provided
because
I
didn't
write
it
down
a.
K
B
Okay,
we
have
a
motion
a
second,
so
the
second
memo
there
with
the
dog
and
cat
license
fee
modified
as
I
described,
which
was
just
my
reflection
of
what
I
heard
from
the
administration
and
then
moving
the
other
memo
as
currently
worded,
which
I
continue
have
some
concerns
about.
But
let's
continue
the
conversations
we
have
a
motion
on
the
floor.
I
had
next
hand
up
was
councilman
Ortiz.
P
Thank
you,
mayor,
I,
wanted
to
see
I.
Think
Matt
Lush
is
here,
hey
Matt.
If
you
could
come
down
and
give
us
share
your
thoughts
on
the
recommendation
for
the
Animal
Care
fees,
I
believe
that's
what
it's
called
yeah.
Q
N
Apologize
Matt,
Lush,
Public
Works
in
terms
of
my
thoughts
of
whether
we
should
study
the
fee
as
I
understood
it
studying
the
fee
and
coming
up
with
recommendations
we
have
no
problem
with
and
if
the
city
manager
has
an
idea
of
folding
into
more
comprehensive
again,
I
would
support
that
and
be
happy
to
engage
in
that
conversation.
We'd
see
what
Revenue
that
is,
and
we
need
to
identify
how
that
would
impact
revenue
and,
if
there's
any
choices
we
need
to
make
as
an
organization.
Okay,.
P
That
makes
sense
so.
H
And
council
member
I
think
we
can
do
that
number
one
fairly
quickly
and
we
can
come
back
in
early
fall
or
in
the
fall
time
frame
and
let
you
know
what
the
impact
is
and
and
come
up
with
some
ideas
about
how
we
could
do
that
just
so,
and
that
we'll
disclose
what
the
impact
is
and
how
we
might
be
able
to
to
work
that
out.
We
would
not
need
to
wait
for
mid-year
or
the
study
session
for
that
piece.
We
could
do
that
right
in
the
fall.
P
R
B
All
okay,
thanks
council
member
councilor,
Foley.
S
Thank
you,
I
have
some
questions
about
the
The
Joint
Memo
from
Torres
Davis,
Ortiz,
dwan
and
batra
regarding
the
items
that
are
offs
are
being
used
to
offset
the
funding
of
Med
30.,
specifically
the
radio
Replacements,
the
we
are
scheduled
to
replace
all
of
our
radios.
These
are
the
radios
I'm,
assuming
maybe,
who
can
talk
to
us
about
the
radios?
That's
met.
S
These
are
the
radios
that
are
part
of
the
interoper.
The
interoperability
group
that
allows
us
to
communicate
with
radios
throughout
the
county
is
that
these
are
these
different
radios
that
we're.
N
Talking
these
are
the
same
radios.
Yes,
they
would
pull
off
as
I
believe
the
recommendation
was
55
of
those
that
are
cycled
and
we
would
put
them
off
for
a
later
time,
and
so
we'd
have
to
identify
if
those
I
I
asked
staff,
is
there
any
criticality
of
those
particular
55,
and
the
answer
was
no
that
doesn't
put
us
off
in
terms
of
anything,
but
in
terms
of
we
have
a
replacement
cycle.
These
55
are
part
of
our
continued
replacement
cycle.
N
We
had
discussed
before
one
of
the
larger
budget
allocations
was
to
keep
up
with,
what's
going
on
as
they
expire
out
in
terms
of
their
ongoing
support.
My
understanding
is
these.
55
are
not
part
of
that
they're,
just
part
of
our
larger
replacement,
as
we
on,
we
always
have
to
replace
our
radios
as
we
go
because
they're
critical
for
our
Public
Safety
staff
members.
This
is
just
part
of
the
regular
replacement
cycle.
Okay,.
S
N
S
N
S
Thank
you
I
appreciate
that
I
am
a
little
concerned
about
this
memo.
Just
because
again,
I
feel
like
we're
playing
with
the
numbers,
and
the
numbers
have
been.
We've
been
working
with
them
for
months
and
come
up
with
a
good
set
of
proposals
that
staff
is
the
recommending
and
that
we're
getting
ready
to
approve
and
now
we're
piecemealing
the
budget
and
I'm
a
little
concerned
that
we
do.
S
We
same
thing
with
information
technology,
I
understand
it's
a
vacant
position,
but
that
doesn't
mean
it's
not
an
important
critical
position,
the
vehicle
replacement.
We
have
to
replace
those
as
well
so
I
I'm
hesitating
on
this
and
to
reduce
the
then
we're
reducing
the
deficit
by
500.
000,
that's
great,
but
we're
do
I
mean
we're
not
we're
asking
staff
to
reduce
the
reserve
on
the
deficit,
so
we're
spending
a
lot
of
money.
We're
not
saving
it
all.
So
I
can't
accept
this
memo,
so
I'm
going
to
vote.
No,
that's.
B
It
for
me
thanks
councilmember
I'd,
also
yeah
I
also
have
concerns
about
the
items
we'd
be
cutting.
We
I
don't
think
we
have
a
great
understanding
of
the
impact.
We
have
worked
so
hard
to
rebuild
our
I.T
Department.
We
have
Direction
in
the
June
message
and
the
budget
we
just
we're
about
to
approve
that
relies
on
us
being
able
to
increase
our
investments
in
Information
Technology.
B
We
can
defer
replacing
Capital
vehicles
and
radios,
but
that's
been
our
habit
as
a
city
for
a
long
time,
and
we
have
a
huge
accumulated
debt
in
terms
of
deferred
maintenance
and
capital
replacement
and
to
the
part
that
concerns
me.
The
most
is
the
city
manager
pointed
out
is
to
reduce
the
deficit
reserve
and
then
bake
in
a
half.
A
million
dollar
deficit
going
in
an
ongoing
way
after
the
next
year
is
something
I.
Have
a
challenge
with
I.
B
Do
support
the
the
direction
as
modified
in
the
other
memo
for
the
dog
and
cat
license,
and
then
the
broader
study
I
certainly
support
that.
But
I
have
real
concerns
about
this.
It
seems
to
me
an
alternative
and
it's
not
something.
B
I
would
want
to
do,
but
another
approach
here
could
be
to
defer
for
another
year
this
question
of
the
substitution,
because
Jennifer
I,
don't
know
if
you
were
I,
don't
know
if
you
or
someone
else
could
explain
the
move,
we're
trying
to
make
to
get
the
sixth
Battalion
Chief
and
how
the
administration
is
thinking
about.
So
maybe
we
just
defer.
H
H
L
I
think,
from
a
a
standpoint
of
of
what
motivates
our
proposal
for
the
sixth
Battalion
two
two
issues,
one
I
call
my
keep
me
up
at
night
motivation,
which
is
when
it
comes
to
the
the
highest
risk
assumed
on
the
emergency
or
fire
ground.
We
have
a
risk
management
model
that
says
that
we
will
risk
our
lives
to
save
savable
lives
in
those
critical
moments
were
where
staff
is
is
taking
on
the
highest
risk.
L
Command
and
control
is
extremely
critical
to
support
scene
safety
because
you
become
very
hyper,
focused
on
task
and
you
need
someone
to
be
hyper,
focused
on
situational
awareness
and
and
overall
command
and
control.
At
this
point
in
time,
the
geography
of
the
city
and
the
addition
of
news
new
stations,
increased
call,
volume
and
and
increasing
traffic
patterns.
B
Thanks
Chief
and
I
certainly
support
that
move.
I
think
the
administration's
approach
here,
which
is
to
prioritize
increased
span
of
control
and
then
give
us
six
months
to
have
a
little
bit
of
extra
capacity
to
then
evaluate,
makes
sense.
I
guess
my
concern
is
rather
than
open
up
a
deficit
and
cut
other
things
from
the
budget
that
we
without
really
deeply
understanding
what
those
cuts
mean
and
impacting
various
departments.
B
T
I
just
want
to
follow
up
on
that
I'm,
going
to
ask
a
question
again
on
on
NBA
60..
Maybe
it's
because
we're
into
our
14th
hour
of
this
in
the
last
two
days,
but
I
feel
like
I'm
having
trouble
understanding
exactly
what
medicine,
what
what
what
NBA
60
does.
As
far
as
this
transitional
period,
I
mean
I.
So
just
explain
it
to
me
one
more
time:
I,
don't
know
who's
going
to
explain
it,
but
somebody
can
explain
to
one
more.
H
Time
Jim
go
ahead
and
it's
it
is
definitely
it's
written
in
there
I'm,
not
sure
at
page
gym,
it's
wow.
It's
just.
H
I
So
yeah
so
again,
so
what
what
we?
What
MBA
60
just
restates
that
the
proposed
budget
includes
that
elimination
of
those
three
fire
captain
positions
currently
assigned
to
the
EMS
Field
coordinator
function,
which
is
mid
Med
30.,
as
that
fire
department
is
reallocating
work
responsibilities
with
also
with
the
addition
of
the
sixth
Battalion
and
the
3.0
new
battalion
chief
Physicians.
That
would
be
added.
I
That's!
What's
going
on
in
the
proposed
budget,
the
fire
department
is
confident
in
the
ability
to
transition
those
met,
30s
duties
across
a
wider
range
of
personnel.
What
they
are
recommending
is
a
six-month
period
for
an
additional
captain
on
standby,
for
the
Department
infection
control
officer
function,
and
so
that
function
will
be
funded
with
MBA
60
for
a
period
of
six
of
six
months.
I
To
the
extent
that
that
standby
position
is
needed
to
continue
as
we
as
the
fire
department
still
works
through
that
transitionary
period,
we
would
make
sure
to
bring
forward
a
budget
adjustment
to
allow
that
to
continue
on
to
the
rest
of
the
fiscal
year.
So
I
think
we'll
be
keep
monitoring
that
so
what
mba60
does
is
sort
of
allows.
Some
one-time
funding
to
to
fund
that
department
infection
control
position
on
at
a
standby
level
through
the
first
six
months
of
the
year,
and
we
will
continue
to
evaluate
that.
T
On
the
other
hand,
this
was
clearly
a
method
of
getting
that
sixth
Battalion
Chief
without
extra
cost
to
the
city,
and
so
the
real
issue
here
is:
do
we
add
funding
to
the
fire
department,
or
do
we
try
to
balance
it
as
we
make
the
change,
and
you
know
I
was
airing
on
the
side
of
trusting
our
fire
chief
about
which
position
was
most
important
to
the
department
and
so
that
so
ultimately,
I
think.
The
decision
for
this
Council,
in
my
mind,
is
more
one
of
do.
T
We
say
we
don't
really
want
to
make
this
change.
We
think
Med
30
is
more
important
than
the
sixth
battalion
chief,
at
least
for
now,
or
do
we
take
the
recommendation,
but
I
didn't
necessarily
think
that
the
third
that
the
the
third
option
of
adding
the
Battalion
Chiefs
and
continuing
mid
30
and
therefore
adding
more
money
to
the
overall
cost
of
the
fire
department
was
one
of
the
options
which
I
think
is
what
this
memo
is
proposing.
So
that's
kind
of
where
I
was
falling
on
this.
T
You
know
it's
certainly
a
reasonable
discussion
as
to
whether
mid
30
is
more
important
or
not
than
the
Battalion
Chiefs,
but
I
think
we've
heard
that
the
chief
himself
is
recommending
that
this
is
the
better
option.
So
that's
where
I
was
following
on
it.
U
Thank
you.
I
I
really
appreciate
the
the
additional
explanation
on
MBA,
60
and
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
completely
understand.
I,
know,
you've
said
it
already
twice
Jim,
but
the
the
one-time
funding
of
125k
is
to
get
us
through
basically
six
months
out
of
the
fiscal
year
for
transition
period
and
then
you'll
evaluate
as
necessary.
You
don't
need
extra
direction
from
us,
you'll
evaluate
and
come
back
to
us
if
they
need
more
transition
time.
Is
that
correct.
I
U
Okay,
I
appreciate
that
extra
clarification,
so
I'm,
okay
with
that
and
I'm
I'm
wondering
if
the
maker
of
the
motion
would
be
would
be
willing
to
to
pull
that
part
of
our
memo.
M
B
Pulls
the
second
yeah
yeah.
It
pulls
the
second
memo.
B
M
B
A
second
councilman
Dawn:
do
you,
do
you
accept
that
friendly
Amendment.
K
Yes,
I
will?
Okay
I
just
want
to
clarify
a
couple
of
things
that
I
do
have
the
confidence
with
with
our
fire
chief
I
just
disagree
with
you
know
the
the
issues
that
we
we
have
I
just
want
to
make
sure
what
is
best
for
firefighter
in
our
department
and
I.
Thank
you,
the
fire
chief
for
answering
the
question.
K
V
Counselor
Candelas
thank
you,
mayor
no
I
I
appreciate
the
the
conversation
and
the
the
exchange
of
ideas
or
opportunities
for
for
Med
30
or
the
the
sixth
Battalion
yeah.
You
know
I've
I've
heard
from
from
you
know
our
local
on
you
know
the
need
that
they
have
councilmember.
Dwan
was
very,
very
passionate
about
this
earlier
and
and
and-
and
so
you
know,
I
worry
that
if
we
are,
you
know
adding
a
six
Battalion
we
are,
we
are
losing
met,
30
of
Val,
which
we,
which
we
all
agree,
I
I
know.
V
In
our
study
session,
we
agreed
on
the
necessity
for
met
30.,
so
now
I'm
wondering
if
there
is
a
if
there
is
an
opportunity
for
a
temporary
or
maybe
a
one-time
allocation,
while
the
while
the
department
adjusts,
because
in
my
conversations
with
the
chief
you
know
the
six-month
runway
on
those
on
on
that
on
on
the
the
Infectious
Disease
expert,
it
sounds
a
little.
V
It
doesn't
sound
too
clear,
but
if
maybe
we
can
do,
you
know
I
understand
the
concern
not
to
obligate
us
for
a
long-term
basis,
but
rather
than
than
get
rid
of
it
and
say
oh
we're
not
doing
Med
30..
Why
don't
we
find
somewhere
in
the
middle,
where
we
can
do
a
one-time
allocation
of
the
med
30
using
the
the
the
the
items
described
in
the
memorandum
written
by
my
colleagues,
Davis,
batra,
dwan
and
and
Ortiz?
V
So
we
can
have
maybe
a
one-year
transition
period
while
we
figure
out
what
works
and
what
doesn't
work
instead
of
saying,
oh
in
six
months,
if
it
works
great,
if
it
doesn't
we'll
come
back
to
you
because
I
think
that's
you
know
we
have
the
potential
to
put,
but
you
know
lives
at
risk
and
and
that's
what
I
don't
want
to
do,
and
so
you
know
I
I
would
I
would
ask
for
for
a
friendly
Amendment.
V
If
you
will
and
so
I'm
going
to
try
to
piece
all
this
as
I
go
because
I
think
we
should.
We
should
at
least
try
to
fund
it
on
a
one-year
basis.
While
we
transition
to
a
six
Battalion
instead
of
getting
rid
of
Med
30
completely
and
saying,
thank
you,
but
no
thank
you.
So
if,
if
the
the
make
or
the
motion
would
accept,
my
Amendment
or
my
friendly
Amendment
I
would
be
I'd
be
grateful.
M
Well,
Jim:
what?
What
do
you
think
of
what
do
you
think
about
that.
H
Maybe
a
gym
or
pipe
in
I
think
what
you,
what
you
know
as
an
alternative
is
that
you
could
take
the
items
a
through
e
and
where
their
Staffing
positions,
I,
wouldn't
recommend
a
year
because
again,
I
think
the
Chief
believes
that
we
can
get
this.
You
know
in
better.
You
know
in
same
or
better
shape
of
a
service
delivery.
H
Is
you
could
take
the
positions
hold
them
vacant
for
a
year,
not
for
a
year
for
six
months
and
then
cut
the
radio
Replacements
in
general
vehicle
replacement
in
half
so
hold
them
all
vacant
for
half
a
year
which
would
provide
the
funding
and
and
then
you
don't
you're,
not
touching
the
future
deficit
Reserve
at
this
point,
so
you
get
a
one-time
way
of
funding
the
the
med
30
for
six
months
and
then
we
could
evaluate
that
I
think
is
another
alternative,
but
I
I
would
hesitant
hesitate
to
do
that
for
a
year.
H
I
H
R
H
Think
that
you
could,
that
would
be
fair
to
consider
without
without
undermining
the
original
proposal
that
we're
trying
to
accomplish
and
giving
more
Runway.
It
gives
it
even
more
Runway
than
our
than
our
proposal
and
you
could
even
use
yeah,
and
so
that's
another
idea.
V
Yeah,
you
know
okay,
well,
well,
I
I
understand
this,
so
how
so
we
would
we
would
review
at
the
mid-year
budget
whether
whether
that
change
is
working
and
not,
and
maybe
continued
funding
in
January
to
see
if,
if,
if
we
need
more
time
than
the
six
months.
H
A
H
Would
recommend
us
keeping
that
125
000?
That's
in
our
proposal,
because
if,
in
that
second
six
months,
we
can
just
if
we
need
that
for
the
infectious
control
position,
we
still
have
that
money
set
aside,
so
I
wouldn't
make
that
one
go
away.
I
would
I
would
keep
this
self-contained
with
this
and
just
delay
hiring
of
those
positions,
and
let
us
do
the
evaluation,
let
you
know
how
the
the
service
is
going.
Yeah.
H
K
K
H
New
Battalion
so
but
I
think
the
the
point
of
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
get
get
them
on
board
and
hired.
So
we
can
start
the
transition
of
these
duties.
Correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
Chief,
so
then
we
can
evaluate
if
we
can
do
without
Med
30,
which
is
what
we're
contemplating
that's.
What
we're
contemplating
so
is
that
correct,
chief,
because
I
think
the
alternative.
L
Yeah
I
think
it
would
be
the
same
question
at
a
different
point
in
time,
because
we'd
be
we'd,
be
closing
one
service
and
opening
a
new
one.
Certainly
from
a
timing
perspective,
it
would
take
us
a
little
while
to
stand
up.
It
would
take
us
more
like
three
months
to
stand
up
the
Battalion
to
do
the
promotions
and
all
that,
so
we
do
have
that
three-month
wiggle
room
so
about
a
quarter.
L
H
So
I
think
the
point
of
us
adding
in
that
keeping
the
captain
for
six
months
with
125
000
on
the
standby,
or
this
other
idea
is
to
give
us
that
over.
V
Extra
Runway-
that's
exactly
that's
exactly
thank
you
for
articulating
my
book,
but
to
finish
it
off
it's
to
give
us
that
Runway
Council
to
the
makers
of
the
motion
to
give
us
that
Runway
and
give
us
that
more
more
time.
To
do
that,
that's
that's!
M
That
yeah,
but
so
it's
to
it's,
to
include
the
battalion
chief,
six
Battalion
Chiefs
Plus
m30
for
a
half
a
year,
correct
council.
V
B
B
I'm
good
create
a
problem
solving
on
the
Deus.
Okay,
we're
close
councilor
Torres
I
had
your
name
still
up.
Did
you
have
anything
else?
Okay,
great?
Okay.
We
have
a
motion,
any
other
comments
or
questions
from
colleagues
right
Tony.
Let's
vote.
W
C
A
X
Y
B
B
X
Today
he
joined
with
me,
is
John
Russo,
director
of
Transportation
aircon
transportation,
department
and
John
kashmani
and
deputy
director,
and
the
finance
department.
John
and
John
will
present
a
short
presentation,
but
I'll
kick
it
off,
but
with
just
a
few
comments.
So
the
lean
action
before
you
today
is
the
last
step
to
recover
costs.
X
The
city
has
paid
to
contractors
with
general
fund
dollars
to
perform
sidewalk
repair
work
staff
in
the
department
of
transportation
and
finance
department,
work
really
hard
to
provide
Property
Owners
with
information
about
the
financial
hardship
program
and
alternative
payment
arrangements
to
avoid
the
lean
process
since
March,
when
the
public
hearing
was
set,
the
count
of
properties
subject
to
lean,
has
reduced
by
a
third
with
a
number
of
property
owners,
taking
advantage
of
the
financial
hardship
program
and
being
placed
on
pavement
plans.
I'll
turn
the
presentation
over
to
John
risto.
Z
Thanks
the
the
slides
up
there,
given
a
visual
representation
of
what
we
look
for
for
sidewalk
repairs,
I'll,
let
you
look
at
those
probably
the
most
significant
one.
Is
the
uplift
that's
on
the
far
left,
and
we
do
that
through
an
inspection
of
our
teams,
as
they.
Z
Z
We
do
about
5
000
sidewalk
repairs
a
year.
Two-Thirds
of
those
are
done
by
the
property
owner
once
where
we
make
them
aware
of
that
repair
needed
and
then
about
a
third
is
done
by
our
teams
using
the
contractor.
Why
we're
here
is
when
our
property
owner
that
has
asked
us
to
do
the
work
has
not
responded
to
our
invoices.
That's
why
we're
here
is
for
the
lean
hearings
that
Council
will
consider
for
this.
So
that's
the
reason
for
this,
so
you
can
see
the
numbers
of
repairs
we
do.
Z
Most
of
them
are
done
very
successfully
by
Property
Owners.
We
then,
when
they
don't
want
to
do
it
we
step
in
and
do
the
work.
Most
often
they
pay
us
those
invoices
when
they
don't
that's
what
we're
here
for,
and
we
do
have
a
very
robust
financial
hardship
program
that
allows
income-based
assistance
for
property
owners
and
homeowners
that
need
some
help,
all
the
way
down
to
paying
all
of
it.
If
they're,
if
they
qualify
for
that
hardship,
we
usually
do
100
or
so
maybe
120
different
hardship
cases
a
year.
Z
G
AA
Good
afternoon,
mayor
Mahan,
council
members
and
members
of
the
public
I'm
John
kachmani
and
deputy
director
of
Finance
Revenue
management,
this
slide
goes
into
more
detail
about
the
typical
sidewalk
lean
process
and
schedule.
The
lean
cycle
generally
spans
one
year
from
August
to
August,
between
August
and
October,
the
city
issues,
three
repair
notices,
conducts
Outreach
about
the
sidewalk
repair
financial
hardship
program
and
perform
sidewalk
repairs
between
November
and
March.
The
Department
of
Transportation
issues,
sidewalk
repair
invoices
and
coordinates
with
Finance
to
send
up
to
three
late
notices
for
unpaid
invoices.
AA
AA
On
March
28
city
council
approved
a
memorandum
which
set
a
June
13th
public
hearing
date
to
recover
unpaid,
sidewalk
Repairs
by
recording
liens
on
April
4th
and
again
on
April
11th
Department
of
Transportation
mailed
notices
to
property
owners
who
were
in
default
of
paying
for
their
sidewalk
repairs.
These
notices
contained
information
on
the
April
25th
administrative
conference,
which
provided
an
opportunity
for
property
owners
to
discuss
their
delinquent
balances.
AA
Here
is
a
heat
map
of
San
Jose
by
District,
showing
the
delinquent
sidewalk
repair
invoices
with
pending
liens.
As
of
May
1st,
the
date
of
the
director's
report,
these
invoices
had
an
average
balance
of
two
thousand
one
hundred
dollars
an
average
age
of
just
over
two
years
and
a
total
outstanding
balance
of
approximately
256
thousand
dollars.
AA
C
E
E
There
was
a
history
of
neglect
from
this
city
and
so
all
of
those
bills
that
District
5
owes
I
suggest
that
they
get
canceled
in
full.
The
entire
debt
cancel
because
of
that
racial
and
of
having
to
do
without
sidewalks
to
that
many
decades.
E
Secondly,
is
that
councilman
Morales
and
myself
had
both
had
the
same
consternation
at
the
fact
that
you,
when
you,
when
you
look
at
the
allocation
system,
who
gets
the
work
done
first,
it's
always
probably
just
always
just
happens
to
be
Rose
Garden,
Willow,
Glen,
Cambrian,
almadin
Valley.
No,
no!
No.
We
need
to
stop
that.
E
You
need
to
stop
and
what
we
need
to
do
is
prioritize
those
neighborhoods
and
it
was
historically
been
neglected
now
either
you're
going
to
Institute
racial
Equity
or
get
rid
of
the
office,
but
quit
calling
the
people
quit
cunning
them,
I'm,
tired
of
your
life.
So
what
you
do
is
you
start
this
to
the
racial
equity
in
the
context
of
Silence
You,
because
my
parents
and
all
the
Chicanos
on
the
east
side
of
San
Jose.
E
C
AB
Hi
there
I
was
just
gonna
piggyback
also
in
Fall.
We
do
need
to
have
better
sidewalks
in
the
neighborhoods.
We
have
been
the
problem
that
we
had
when
they
did
North
Capital
us.
They
were
doing
as
they
were
doing
like
repairs
to
the
overall
area.
AB
Due
to
the
fact
that
we
were
having
bart
coming
in
and
new
development,
they
started
doing
sidewalk
repairs,
but
they
did
not
notify
everyone,
and
we
already
have
crosswalks
that
the
beacons
aren't
properly
working
and
we
have
people
with
Mobility
impairments
and
it's
necessary
to
have
proper,
walking,
proper
sidewalks
and
even
when
I
canvassed
in
the
past,
I
would
walk.
Those
sidewalks
and
I
would
look
down.
I
would
see
if
people
would
be
able
to
properly
cross
if
crosswalks
were
marked.
AB
If
the
sidewalks
didn't
have
indentations
in
many
of
the
trees
that
were
planted
by
the
city
are
the
ones
that
are
causing
the
damage
to
the
sidewalks,
and
then
it
becomes
the
responsibility
of
property
owners
to
re,
to
make
some
repairs.
Well,
really
it
should
be
part
of
the
city
to
take
care
of
that.
AB
It's
important
that
we
properly
notify
and
that
we
properly
let
people
know
and
create
clear
markings
for
detours
that
people
that
are
walking
that
can't
that
can't
walk
or
that
are
in
that
are
in
like
wheelchairs,
so
that
they're
not
using
the
bike
lanes
because
North
Capital
in
places
like
that
are
already
dangerous.
We
need
to
do
the
right
thing
for
people
that
have
those
needs.
We
need
to
have
proper
sidewalks
for
everyone.
We
cannot
have
people
walking
on
on
the
streets,
even
whether
unincorporated
or
Incorporated
areas.
So
that's
about
it.
W
Yeah
just
a
question:
looking
at
the
minimum
page
I,
don't
see
a
page
number,
the
section
where
it
talks
about
the
financial
hardship,
the
system
program,
so
the
the
page
following
that
it
goes
into
another
page
talks
about
from
July
2022
to
May
9
2023,
and
it
goes
over
about
89
properties
at
an
approximate
cost
of
390..
It
goes
on
to
say
that
the
annual
allocation
for
sidewalk
repair
financial
hardship
program
is
429.
What
I'm
curious
about
is,
if
you
only
reuse
390
you
allocated
421
29.
W
Z
Well,
we
are
not
just
John
Resto
again
to
answer
that
question
we
don't
get
to
roll
over,
but
we
do
go
back
to
budgets
during
the
year
if
we
need
some
more
to
request
an
additional
budget,
if
that
hardship
program
requires
more,
does
that
make
sense?
Does
that
answer
the.
W
W
How
often
is
is
the
case
that
you
asked
for
an
addition.
Is
that
I'm
just
curious
last.
G
W
Right
and
then
the
the
financial
hardship
assistant
program,
so
so
the
the
breakdown
of
the
the
guidelines-
that's
for
the
owner
of
the
property
right.
So
if
I'm,
renting
a
property
that
doesn't
apply
to
me,
it
applies
to
the
owner
of
the
property.
W
Okay,
all
right
and
then
you
know,
I
I
just
want
I,
don't
know
what
the
solution
is.
I
think
it
probably
requires
a
broader
conversation
and
I
suspect.
Having
been
on
the
council
about
six
and
a
half
years,
almost
seven
years,
I'm
sure
this
has
probably
come
up
in
the
past,
so
I'm
not
going
to
dig
into
this
any
more
than
just
just
simply
to
point
out,
as
was
most
as
with
as
with
most
things
that
we
deal
with
in
the
city.
W
There
are
certain
issues
that
seem
to
sort
of
sit
in
certain
parts
of
the
District
of
the
city.
If
you
will,
and
so
I
couldn't
help,
but
look
at
the
map
on
slide.
Eight,
for
example,
and
just
look
at
the
most
of
the
dots
and
and
the
places
seem
to
be
in
in
the
districts
of
the
city
that
maybe
have
most.
You
know
challenging
circumstances
related
to
like
people.
A
W
Know
being
lower
socioeconomic
status
or
maybe
aren't
making
as
enough
money
and
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out,
I,
don't
know
what
the
solution
is
or
what
that
indicates,
but
I'd
be
curious
if
you
have
any
general
thoughts
of
that.
So,
if
you
look
at
I
mean
you
see
the
line
running
from
the
number
four
all
the
way
down
to
the
base
of
District
10.
W
I
mean
most
of
the
of
the
dots
right
of
the
plots
are
sort
of
to
the
to
the
east
of
that
a
lot
of
the
concentration
in
District
Five,
obviously
District
three
District
Seven
near
my
district
and
District
Seven,
which
is
obviously
the
you
know
if
you're
familiar
with
the
area,
it's
known
as
a
place
where
you
know
a
lot
of
folks
are
are
probably
not
doing
as
well
as
other
parts
of
the
Silicon
Valley.
But
anyway,
do
you
have
any
do
you
have
any
thoughts?
I,
don't
know
if
there's
well.
Z
Council,
member
you're
right
it
act.
It
comes
up
every
year
in
this
time,
because
many
cities
do
put
the
responsibility
on
it
on
adjacent
homeowners,.
Z
Still
a
hard
concept
to
get
past,
so
that's
number
one
number
two:
it
is
that
it
is
true
that
there
is
when
we're
coming
here
for
these
liens,
that
it
probably
follows
this
same
pattern.
Every
year,
I.
G
Z
Number
three:
maybe
the
the
this
goes
back
in
history.
The
city
used
to
have
a
grant
program.
We
would
put
funding
in
to
help
that
problem
I,
think
that
went
away
maybe
10
years
ago,
or
something
so
it
I,
don't
know
that
it
ever
paid
a
hundred
percent,
but
it
paid
it
allowed
for
property
owners
to
apply
for
an
amount
of
money
that
would
reduce
or
cover
a
large
share
of
what
that
was,
so
that
we
don't
have
that.
We
have
the
hardship
program,
but
it
was
more
robust
with
a
grant
program.
Okay,.
W
J
Thought
I
saw
it
it
wasn't,
it
wasn't
for
repair
costs,
it
was
for
putting
sidewalks
where
there
had
not
been.
W
K
B
K
Thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you,
John
for
the
and
team
for
the
report,
my
understanding
that
you
have
122
residents,
that
is,
do
you
you
know
not
paying
their
bill
on
this
am
I
correct,
122.,
right
out
of
122
I.
Believe
89
was
on
the
forgiveness
program
in
a
sense,
89
I
thought,
I
read
the
number.
K
So
to
122,
since
you
put
out
this
report
so
37
41.
AA
AA
Yes,
we
have
Department
of
Transportation
repair
notices
and
then
Department
of
Finance
invoices
sent
out
in
English
with
translations
for
Spanish
and
Vietnamese,
with
the
translated
sentence,
asking
them
to
call
our
language
assistance
line
if
they
need
assistance
with
translation.
AA
X
Member,
can
you
confirm
timing
of
when
when
they
would
make
payment,
are
you
asking
for
the
made
payment
now
or
before
we
lean?
Yes,.
X
I
I
believe
I
believe
there's
the
lane
fee
has
has
been
is
is
part
of
the
report,
but
we
have
five
days
before
it
becomes
final
after
this
action.
So
if
we
receive
payment
within
the
next
five
days,
the
lien
fee
would
not
be
part
of.
It
would
not
go
forward
with
the
lien,
so
they
would,
they
would
save
on
that
lien
fee.
S
S
S
X
No
once
the
lien
is
placed,
it
will
stay
at
the
amount
that
we
that
it's
leaned
to
the
property
until
it
goes
to
the
property
tax,
this
coming
fall
and
and
next
year
it
will
be
placed
on
their
property
tax.
They
make
payments
there.
If
there
is
a
sale
of
the
property
before
that
time,
then
it
would
go
through
the
the
escrow
and
be
paid
off
as
part
of
the
sale
transaction.
Okay,.
S
I
think
you
just
answered
my
second
question,
so
if
normally
a
lien
would
be
paid
through
escrow
through
a
sale
transaction
or
a
refinance,
it'd
have
to
be
taken
care
of
at
that
point.
But
you're
did
you
just
say
that
it
gets
added
to
the
property
taxes
correct
and
in
the
next
property
tax
cycle?
Yes,
okay,
great!
Thank
you
that
helps.
B
W
M
C
Cohen
aye
Ortiz
Davis,
yes,
dwan.
V
V
C
B
AE
Right
good
afternoon,
mayor
and
city
council,
my
name
is
Wendy
salazi
and
I'm.
The
division
manager
in
the
police
department's
division
of
cannabis
regulation
with
me
today
is
Martina.
Davis
division
manager
and
planning
building
code
enforcement
in
Victor
Farley
from
the
office
of
Economic,
Development
and
cultural
Affairs,
and
also
with
me
today,
is
the
assistant
chief
Paul
Joseph.
AE
Most
recently
in
February
2022
city
council
approved,
updates
to
title
6
and
20
to
the
of
the
Munich
code
and
allowed
businesses
to
locate
in
commercial
zoning
districts
modified
distance
requirements
to
sensitive
uses,
newer,
relocated,
storefronts
are
prohibited
from
opening
in
Council
district
7
and
allows
the
existing
16
registered
cannabis
businesses
to
open
a
second
retail
storefront
location
and
then
we're
allowing
up
to
10
new
Equity
owned
retail
businesses,
only
five
of
which
may
be
retail
storefront.
AD
So
the
ordinance
adopted
by
Council
in
February
2022
had
a
main
goal
of
allowing
the
industry
to
expand
and
expand
to
commercial
areas,
and
a
part
of
the
goal
was
to
allow
them
to
start
to
move
their
retail
out
of
council
district
7,
largely
it's
where
a
lot
of
them
are
what
we
proposed.
At
that
time,
we
adjusted
some
of
those
distance
requirements.
We
thought
we
hit
something
that
worked.
AD
We
had
done
a
mapping
exercise,
we
found
what
we
thought
was
over
a
thousand
eligible
locations,
and
so
we
thought
we
were
going
to
have
a
successful
ordinance
and
successful
program,
and
unfortunately
that
did
not
happen.
We
found
a
couple
issues.
First
off
that
we
had
made
some
errors
in
our
initial
mapping
exercise.
AD
There
was
a
lot
more
sensitive
uses
than
we
were
aware
of,
particularly
I
would
say
daycare
centers,
and
so,
when
the
industry
started
looking
after
February,
they
were
just
encountering
a
lot
of
challenges
with
those
sites
we
thought
would
be
available
to
them.
The
other
challenge
that
they've
found
is
unique
to
their
industry
being
federally
illegal.
To
make
a
long
story
short
there's
a
lot
of
property
owners
that
are
unwilling
or
unable
to
lease
to
them,
so
it
really
shrinks
their
available
sites.
AD
That's
what
led
to
this
Council
direction
that
we
were
given
back
in
November,
which
was
to
modify
some
of
those
distance
requirements
to
sensitive
uses.
I'll
just
talk
about
that
in
a
second
remove
the
overlay
for
the
higher
crime
police
beat.
That
was
something
that
we
didn't
find
was
effective
or
made
a
lot
of
sense
in
when
we
started
really
using
it,
eliminate
distance
requirements
between
the
storefronts
and
then
propose
a
concentration
standard.
AD
So
just
as
a
reminder,
this
is
what
was
adopted
in
February.
You
can
see
the
largest
distances
are
to
those
sensitive
uses
that
involve
children
and
I've
highlighted
the
changes,
so
first
off
would
be
Parks
rec
centers
community
centers
libraries
would
go
down
where
it
does
apply
to
500
feet.
Measured
from
the
property
line,
schools,
daycare,
centers
or
youth
centers,
which
are
youth
oriented
businesses,
would
change
from
a
thousand
feet
in
most
cases
to
a
new
dual
measurement,
where
it
would
be
500
feet
from
the
property
line
or
a
thousand
foot
path
of
travel.
AD
So
from
the
public
entrance
of
the
Cannabis
business
to
the
public
entrance
of
the
school
daycare
center
Etc,
they
would
need
to
show
they
conform
with
both
so
effectively.
The
more
restrictive
would
apply,
and
we
do
think
that
would
be
the
500
feet
and
then
I'll
end
with
our
concentration
standards.
So
initially
Council
had
adopted
a
500
or
a
thousand
foot
path
of
travel
distance
between
the
in
the
retail
storefronts.
As
part
of
that
November
Direction,
they
directed
us
to
go
ahead
and
remove
that
strict
distance
requirement
and
propose
something
to
address
concentration.
AD
We
looked
at
a
number
of
options.
We've
evaluated
this
a
few
times
times
and
where
we
landed
was
borrowing
something
from
how
we
look
at
off
sale
of
alcohol,
which
is
no
more
than
four
cannabis
retail
storefronts
within
a
thousand
foot
radius.
We
do
think
that
this
has
a
balance
between
ensuring
that
we
don't
have
a
super
concentration
of
these
businesses,
but
also
gives
that
flexibility
for
them
to
find
a
site
given
some
of
those
challenges
that
they've
encountered.
AD
So
in
summary,
as
I
said,
you
know
unfortunately
I
hate
to
say
this:
the
ordinance
that
we
brought
to
you
in
February
just
wasn't
successful.
It
did
not
meet
that
goal
of
allowing
our
industry
to
move
to
retail
areas,
and
we
do
feel
agree
with
Council
and
feel
strongly
that
changes
do
need
to
be
made.
If
we
aren't
going
to
facilitate
this
industry
relocating
outside
of
our
industrial
districts
into
our
commercial
districts,
for
retail
I
will
pass
it
back
to
Wendy
to
discuss
the
title.
Vi
changes.
AC
Thank
you
Wendy
good
evening,
mayor
city,
council.
The
Cannabis
Equity
pilot
program
was
part
of
the
Cannabis
Equity
assessment
that
city
council
approved
in
February
2022.
you.
You
approve
that
and
you
established
the
program
and
you
established
the
principle
that
10
new
registrations
will
be
awarded
to
businesses
that
completed
satisfactorily
the
program
that
was
to
be
defined.
AC
The
office
of
Economic
Development
closely
with
the
police
department
and
the
office
of
racial
Equity,
designed
procured,
negotiated,
managed
and
in
May
of
this
year,
launched
the
academy
in
parallel
with
that,
when
we
designed
and
made
public
an
application
process
for
residents
of
the
city
and
over
80
people
completed
that
initial
expression
of
interest
in
in
the
fall
of
2022.
And
then
we
subsequently
designed
a
detailed
online
application
form
which
24
residents
completed
by
May
15th
and
a
further
resident
has
now
completed
and
joined.
AC
I'd
like
to
give
a
personal
shout
out
to
a
colleague
of
mine
in
the
office
of
Economic
Development,
Luanne
Pham
who's,
whose
Outreach
with
residents
in
the
city
has
been
outstanding
throughout
and
has
spent
many
hours
with
individual
residents,
helping
them
to
assist
them
with
the
information
and
the
evidence,
that's
required
to
enable
them
to
complete
the
application
process
and
meet
the
standards
set
by
the
police
department.
AC
We
are
in
a
position
now
where
we
can
run
the
program
in
full.
The
program
will
run
to
the
end
of
June
2024
and
we
will
accept
an
Open
Access
enrollment
program
that
will
run
to
January
2024,
enabling
any
Resident
in
the
city
that
meets
the
requirements
set
within
the
academy
assessment
to
join
the
program.
AC
AC
C
After
after
Fernando
I
have
Tamara
online.
Q
Mayor
City,
Council
Members.
Thank
you.
It's
good
to
see
this
report.
I've
I've
been
following
the
Cannabis
injuries.
It's
2014.
the
regulations
creating
a
kind
of
a
security
assistant
program.
Looking
at
the
rules
to
you
know,
allow
new
dispensaries
all
great
stuff,
and
it
was
actually
that
kind
of
forward
thinking
and
Innovative
progress
that
I
found
in
my
company
Vapor
tint
lounges
here
in
San
Jose
in
2014.
Q
in
2018
I
became
the
first
business
licensed
in
the
state
to
host
cannabis
events
and
when,
after
producing
a
number
of
private
cannabis,
events
in
the
city
of
San
Jose
from
2014
to
2017,
San
Francisco,
reached
out
to
me
and
I,
was
actually
able
to
work
with
them
and
create
their
cannabis
event.
On
pilot
program,
I
then
went
to
Oxnard
California
to
create
third
cannabis
pilot
program.
I
then
went
to
Stockton
California,
which
is
my
city
of
birth,
created
their
cannabis
event.
Q
Pilot
program
Sacramento
is
submitting
my
proposal
to
their
City
Council
next
month
and
so
I'll,
although
this
is
all
great
and
I
love,
seeing
the
Forward,
Thinking
and
and
just
progress
in
this
cannabis
event
area.
I
believe
that
the
city
is
missing
out
on
a
significant
opportunity
to
support
our
small
businesses,
our
local
Arts
community,
and
that's
to
allow
for
State
licensed
social
consumption
events
in
our
city.
Q
These
are
the
exact
same
programs
that
I'm
developing
in
other
cities,
but
the
entire
vision
and
program
that
I
created
was
to
do
this
here
in
my
home
of
San
Jose
and
so
I
just
asked
the
city
council
to
as
we
continue
to
look
at
these
and
amend
these
ordinances.
To
not
forget
the
cannabis
event
organizer
license,
because
the
person
sitting
in
front
of
you
has
demonstrated
leadership
in
this
space
I'm
on
my
fifth
city
of
getting
this
done.
Q
AF
AB
Have
I
have
been
following
the
Cannabis
industry
as
well,
because
I'm
involved
with
blockchain
technology
and
I
have
been
wanting
to
do
like
Farm
to
Table
stuff,
so
that
we
know
exactly
where
things
are
coming
from
other
trades,
whether
there
are
patents
and
such
for
specific
issues.
I
have
also
met
different
individuals
that
are
having
challenges
hosting
events,
even
if
they're
private
I
know
certain
agencies
that
have
private
events,
because
they
are
necessary
to
individuals
that
are
suffering
from
terminal
illnesses
such
as
HIV
cancer,
and
they
are
very
beneficial
for
those
individuals.
AB
We
need
to
have
more
of
that,
especially
if
they're
private
events,
they
would
be
encourageable,
because
sometimes
my
concern
would
be
that
you
know.
While
individuals
are,
you
know
whether
they're
consuming
marijuana
as
legal
as
it
is
sometimes
it's
in
front
of
in
front
of
children,
and
that
is
a
concern
because
of
the
smell
the
blow
over
and
all
of
those
things.
So
it's
just
something
that
we
do
have
to
be
mindful,
but
it's
important
to
have
places
like
that
like
when
we
had
the
Church
of
cannabis.
AB
That
was
an
amazing
place
and
it
was
like
a
non-profit
because
we
need
to
have
such
places
that
are
non-profits
that
are
specific
locations
that
can
provide
assistance
to
individuals.
It's
been,
you
know,
people
that
consume
marijuana
are
frowned
upon,
even
when
they
need
to
use
it
for
health
benefits.
AB
AG
Good
evening,
honorable
mayor
and
city
council,
Sean
Kelly
Rye
in
business
and
in
life,
many
things
are
hard
and
I
want
to
point
out
a
couple
of
things.
In
particular,
one
is
Having
the
courage
to
start
something,
and
the
second
is
having
the
patience
and
the
strength
to
see
it
through
to
the
end.
In
2019
council
member
of
Pam
Foley
proposed
cannabis,
free
zoning
and
Regulatory
changes
to
combat
the
illegal
cannabis.
AG
Market
meet
the
consumer
demand
which
is
doubled
since
the
exception
of
the
Cannabis
program,
assist
the
small
businesses
and
increase
the
tax
revenue
of
the
city.
All
of
this
focused
on
promoting
the
larger
vision
of
carrying
out
the
will
and
the
spirit
of
the
voters
when
they
passed
proposition
64
in
November
of
2016.,
since
this
was
made
by
the
city
council
as
the
number
one
priority
of
2019
we've
had
a
global
pandemic
economic
turmoil
and
unforeseen
delays.
AG
C
AH
Good
evening,
mayor
councilman
excuse
me
city,
council
and
staff.
This
this
Academy
is
great.
First
of
all,
I
wasn't
really
that
aware
of
it,
but
I'm
with
the
minority
business
Consortium
at
this
moment,
and
what
we
do
is
we
advocate
for
small
women,
minority
on
business,
lgbtq
and
other
underrepresented
businesses.
We've
had
several
people
come
to
us
and
ask
and
show
great
interest
in
opening
cannabis
businesses,
and
then
I've
heard
from
some
people
that
a
lot
of
people
come
through
this
program.
AH
AH
Aren't
good
business
people
too.
We
do
understand
that,
but
I
I
don't
want
to
be
able
to
be
in
a
situation
where
we're
recommending
something
like
this
to
some
people
or
to
their
businesses
and
they
lose
their
livelihoods
or
whatever,
because
we
aren't
fully
aware
of
the
pitfalls
in
this
in
this
business.
AH
And
so
you
know,
since
you
started
your
Academy
and
and
you
guys
have
trained
people
and
started
new
businesses,
I'm
curious,
what
the
what
the
success
rate
is,
and
you
know,
and
then
for
those
businesses
who
don't
succeed,
do
they
have
any
other
recourse.
Thank
you
very
much.
S
This
definitely
has
been
a
long
haul
from
2019
to
today.
I
want
to
thank
Martina
and
Wendy
for
hanging
in
there
with
us
with
all
of
our
questions
and
concerns,
and
our
modifications
and
coming
back
to
you
and
you
we're
always
very
willing
to
work
with
us
and
our
staffs
and
I
really
truly
appreciate
that
especially
the
last
go-around
was.
We
thought
we
were
there
and
then
we
had
a
few
more
things
that
we
needed
to
bring
in
so
I
I'm
really
grateful
for
that.
You
know
this.
S
Cannabis
has
been
legal
for
a
while
now
in
this
state,
and
but
we've
learned
a
lot
over
time
too
that
at
first
we
had
the
restrictions
of
where
they
could
be
within
the
city
of
San
Jose,
and
then
we
brought
forward,
as
you
said,
ordinance
last
year
to
move
the
licenses
around
or
to
be
able
to
expand
the
licenses
and
then
move
them
the
dispensaries
to
other
parts
of
the
state,
the
city.
So
there
wouldn't
be
this
heavy
concentration
of
cannabis
dispensaries
in
District
Seven,
in
particular
the
council
member.
S
At
the
time,
Maya
Esparza
was
very
concerned
about
that.
You
know
the
importance
of
making
sure
that
the
legal
cannabis
industry
thrives
is
really
critical
and
it's
critical
for
a
couple
of
reasons
and
One
is
because
it
is
a
tax
revenue
for
us
it.
It
generates
decent
income
into
our
general
fund.
These
are
general
fund
dollars,
but
the
second
is
that
if
we
have
a
robust
and
vibrant
successful
legal
market,
then
we
have
a
it,
discourages
the
illicit
Market
Market
and
that's
really
what
we
need
to
stop.
S
We
need
to
make
it
not
as
easy
for
illicit
vendors
of
cannabis
to
be
out
there
selling.
So
the
way
we
do,
that
is
that
we
make
our
businesses
more
accessible,
easier
to
access.
We
review
looking
at
fees
and
reducing
the
fees
which
is
part
of
the
motion,
part
of
what
you're,
looking
at
already
and
part
of
the
motion
that
I
going
to
make
in
a
couple
of
minutes,
we've
already
worked
on
zoning
changes
and
things
like
that.
We
didn't
complete
them.
S
We
have
a
few
more
modifications
today
and
I'm
actually
really
excited
to
bring
this
forth
and
hope.
This
puts
puts
this
conversation
to
rest
for
a
little
bit,
but
I
can
tell
we're
going
to
be
talking
probably
about
events
soon.
That's
probably
next
on
on
the
list,
and
then
the
equity
piece
is
really
important
as
well.
I
want
I
do
want
to
address
a
few
concerns
that
occasionally
we
hear
from
the
community
and
one
is
about
crime,
there's
concerns
about
these
dispensaries
and
that
there's
a
potential
of
crime
increase,
but
really
assistant
chief.
S
AI
Council
member,
no,
it
really
isn't
so.
Last
year,
for
example,
we
had
371
463
events
or
calls
for
service
and
61
of
those
occurred
at
one
of
the
dispensaries
and
and
just
because
the
address
of
an
event
is
at
one
of
these
locations
doesn't
necessarily
mean
the
event
is
even
tied
to
the
dispensary.
Necessarily,
so
no
I
would
I
would
say,
they're,
not
they're,
not
right
now
generating
calls
for
service
or
crime
for
us
that.
S
So
you
said
over
300
000
calls
and
61
to
dispensaries,
but
may
not
be
related
to
the
business
at
all.
That's
correct!
Thank
you.
That's
that's
fabulous!
The
other
is
concerns
about
public
consumption
near
storefronts
and
and
of
course,
that's
a
concern
and
there's
bans
on
that
and
and
inability
for
people
to
access
that.
Of
course,
we
have
laws
against
underage
underage
users,
at
around
the
cities
and
in
our
schools,
and
the
other
is
access
to
children
and
and
I'm
very
concerned
about
access
to
our
children.
S
But
the
distance
requirements
to
our
schools
and
parks
are
really
conforming
to
what
the
state
already
conform
has
as
far
as
its
regulations
for
cannabis.
So
really,
what
we're
seeing
today
in
our
ordinance
is
aligning
our
regulations
with
the
states.
What's
really
important,
the
state
has
its
own
set
of
regulations
and
then
the
Cannabis
businesses
have
to
adopt
to
ours
and
adapt
to
ours
and
the
state,
so
we're
melding
them
a
little
bit
and
making
it
easier.
AD
S
Okay,
so
with
that
I
I
appreciate
the
my
colleagues
who
participated
on
this
memo
with
me:
council,
member
Jimenez,
Taurus,
Cohen
and
Ortiz,
and
so
I'm.
Taking
this
in
two
motions
is
that
right,
I
have
to
move
4.1.
S
So
I
will
approve
the
staff
recommendation
on
4.1
and
include
our
memo,
which,
which
removes
the
already
the
external
audit,
is
removed
per
the
staff
recommendation.
But
our
memo
calls
for
that
to
be
effective
immediately
and
then
we
ask
staff
to
direct
to
conduct
a
comprehensive
review
of
a
schedule
of
fines
which
I
know
they're
already
working
on
with
the
request
that
had
come
back
to
council
but
after
it
goes
to
pisfiz
First
and
with
that
ISO
move.
Second,.
AI
Council
member
I
mean
I
think
the
illegal
sales
that
are
that
are
mostly
competing
with
the
established
businesses
are
more
purely
illicit
either
on
the
street
or
someone
selling
from
their
residents,
or
you
know
traditional
kind
of
illicit
drug
sales,
I'm
not
familiar
exactly
with
other
establish
retail
establishments,
selling
vape
marijuana
under
the
you
know
in
the
manner
what
you're
describing
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
that's,
not
a
problem
that
we've
been
addressing
frequently.
Maybe
Wendy
has
some
more
on
that.
AE
Yeah,
if
we
are
made
aware
of
that,
then
we
do
quote,
coordinate
with
our
code
enforcement
division
of
of
planning,
building
code
enforcement,
and
we
also
there's
a
a
I.
Don't
know
hotline's
the
right
word,
but
there's
an
email
that
we
send
to
the
state,
and
so
they
take
complaints
there.
So
we'll
send
information
to
them.
AE
If
we're
made
aware
of
something
that
looks
like
it's
illegal
in
our
city
and
so
we'll
bring
the
state
in
because
they
have
an
enforcement
team
that
is
spread
out
amongst
the
divisions
of
like,
however,
they
divide
up
the
state
and
so
they'll
come
in
and
then
they'll
coordinate
with
us,
and
then
we
coordinate
with
Patrol
to
make
sure
that
there's
someone
with
them
when
they
go
on
site
at
these
businesses
and
then
again,
code
enforcement
usually
accompanies
them
as
well.
AE
K
AI
Councilmember
that
that
type
of
situation
would
that
would
I
mean
that
would
be
an
arrest
that
would
be
a
felony
arrest,
okay
and
that
that
I
think
that's
something
outside
of
the
the
regulation
of
these
businesses.
D
K
AI
K
So
question
to
staff
is:
is
San
Jose
fine
for
illegal
cannabis,
comparable
to
other
cities.
AE
I
believe
that's
the
direction
from
the
from
the
other
memo
for
us
to
look
at
it,
I
mean
it's
across
the
board,
honestly
Statewide,
we
did
start
looking
into
it
and
and
I
mean
some
of
ours
are
right
in
line
with
others,
and
then
some
are
some
are
higher.
Some
are
lower
kind
of
just
depends
on
on
what
we're
looking
at,
but
but
we
will
come
back
with
that
through
the
through
the
public
safety
Finance
strategic
support
committee.
If
that's
approved
tonight
that
motion
and
we'll
have
the
better
information,
then.
K
With
the
original
motion
from
a
council
member
Foley,
except
a
friendly
Amendment,
that
we
increase
fine
and
for
illegal
businesses
and
individual
that
sell
cannabis
without
license
in
the
city
of
San,
Jose,.
S
S
But
you're
bringing
back
all
of
these
things,
you're
reviewing
the
fees
and
comparing
them
to
other
cities
and
other
jurisdictions
and
they'll
bring
them
back
to
us.
So
I
I
mean
I,
I'm,
I,
understand
where
you're
going
and
and
I
agree
with
that,
but
I
think
we've
already
given
them
the
instructions
to
bring
this
back
to
council,
with
the
looking
at
the
fees
and
fines
and
going
to
pispizz
first
and
then
back
to
then
to
council.
J
Thank
you.
I
just
had
a
quick
question
regarding
the
number
of
dispensaries
that
could
be
in
a
location
and
I
thought.
I
saw
that
it
was
sort
of
no
more
than
four
within
a
certain
sort
of
like
radius,
location
I.
It
was
what
to
my
attention
that
you
know
why.
J
Why
use
four
when
you
can
actually
have
less
or
you
know
and
I
realized
that
in
the
original
proposal
there
were
not
many
places
given
you
know
the
distances,
and
all
of
that
so
I'm
just
wondering
you
know
why
you
went
to
four.
Is
it
because
it
sort
of
parallels
to
what
is
sort
of
in
other
areas
or
or
what
what
you
found
yeah.
AD
Similar
concerns,
when
you
heard
from
the
community,
so
you
know
we,
we
just
said
this
is
an
existing
standard,
but
you
know
it
could
go
more.
It
could
go
less.
Okay,.
B
Thanks
vice
mayor
council
member
batra,
let
his
hand
up
early
and
I
forgot.
He
had
done
that.
Council
members,
your
hand
still
up
I.
Y
Think
it
is
at
least
I'm
up
go
ahead.
All
right!
Okay,
I'd
like
to
ask
the
question
about.
There
was
a
distance
shown
from
the
libraries.
Could
you
please
tell
what
the
distance
from
library
is
used
to
be
and
what
it
will
be
and
what
is
the
state's
requirement
for
that
I
think
the
Martina
will
be
the
expert
there.
AD
So,
right
now
in
urban
Villages
or
downtown
under
our
current
regulations,
there
is
no
distance
requirement
to
libraries
and
that
would
not
change
the
only
where
it
place
it
would
change.
Would
it
would
go
from
a
thousand
feet
to
500
feet
outside
of
downtown
or
Urban
Villages.
What
I
will
share,
though,
as
well,
is
that
a
lot
of
our
commercial
corridors
are
designated
as
Urban
Villages,
probably
most
of
them,
and
so
generally
the
the
sites
the
industry
is
looking
for
are
in
urban
Villages.
Y
So
if
it
is
600
feet,
my
suggestion
is
since
you're
aligning
everything
else
to
the
state
and
trying
to
be
as
strict
or
as
lenient.
I
suggest
that
we
adopt
the
same
distance.
Y
So,
council,
member
of
Foley,
if
you
would.
Y
Yeah,
so,
okay,
while
you're
doing
that,
let
me
ask
a
a
couple
of
other
questions.
Part
of
it
was
answered
already
when
council
member
Joanne
asked
his
stuff
assistant
chief,
you
indicated
that
you
haven't
did
any
that
much
extra
calls
because
of
the
or
near
the
establishments
related
to
this
thing,
and
you
also
answer
the
question
on
about
the
DUI:
do
we
encounter
more
vehicle
incidents
where
cannabis
might
be
a
factor.
AI
AI
We
also
don't
have
the
same
type
of
measurement
tools
for
marijuana,
so
it's
it's
hard
to
it's
hard
to
to
say
for
certain
whether
we're
not
whether
or
not
we're
seeing
more
of
it,
but
certainly,
if
there's
evidence,
there's
a
collision
or
we
stop
at
somebody
for
a
vehicle
code,
violation
and
there's
evidence
that
they've
been
using
marijuana
and
there's
evidence
that
they're
impaired.
Then
we
can
certainly
make
it
du
IRS,
but
I
I.
Truly,
don't
have
statistics
on
that
and
whether
or
not
that's
increased.
Y
So
my
request
would
be
two-fold
one,
since
we
are
making
this
a
fairly
a
normal
element
of
her
life.
That
means
anybody
can
write,
Age
and
and
legally
buy
the
stuff
and
consume
it.
Then.
Maybe
it
is
time
for
you
to
acquire
that
equipment
which
will
allow
you
to
have
such
kind
of
testing
so
because
the
usage
is
going
to
continue
to
grow.
Y
It
looks
like,
with
the
number
of
businesses
growing
the
number
of
tax
revenue
coming
to
us
growing,
it's
very,
very
straightforward
that
it
will
be
increasing
the
usage
so
and
the
chances
are
that
you're
going
to
encounter
such
people
more
often
okay,
so
it
would
be
time
to
acquire
the
equipment.
My
suggestion
would.
AI
Be
so
to
the
best
of
my
knowledge
that
technology
is
is
being
developed
and
I,
don't
know
that,
there's
a
very
precise
measuring
method
like
with
alcohol,
you
can
measure
a
certain
concentration
in
the
blood,
but
with
marijuana
it
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
that
there's
a
standard
by
which
anyone
is
using
to
say
that
you
know
this
amount
is
intoxicated
in
this.
AI
You
know
a
lesser
amount
is
not
or
even
how
to
measure
that,
and
then
it
stays
in
the
blood
system
for
quite
a
quite
a
long
time
after
use,
but
the
person
wouldn't
necessarily
be
impaired,
even
though
they
might
test
positive.
So
it's
just
there
really
isn't
the
technology
right
now
for
us
to
do
a
lot
of
great
measurements,
so
we're
going
to
rely
on
sort
of
driving
factors.
You
know
with
somebody's
driving.
Obviously
impaired
you
know:
are
they?
Are
they
obviously
impaired
in
their
actions
and
things
like
that?
Y
Would
you
have
any
concern
about
people
Gathering,
Together,
driving
to
a
place
then
coming
and
having
a
cannabis
party
and
then
having
to
drive
away
today,
they're,
probably
consuming
in
their
homes
or
wherever,
but
there's
no
reason
for
them
to
all
gather
together
and
drive
to
a
place
and
then
have
to
drive
back
from
there
would?
Would
you
have
any
concern
in
that
area?.
AI
Well,
councilmember
I
definitely
appreciate
your
concerns
and
again
it
would
be.
You
know
like,
like
a
similar
to
an
event
in
which
alcohol
is
served
in
a
public
forum,
I
mean,
obviously,
people
are
allowed
to
consume
it,
but
they're
not
allowed
to
drive
away
while
intoxicated
or
commit
other
crimes
due
to
a
level
of
intoxication,
so
I
mean
again
I'm
not
sure
that
there
would
be
a
a
greater
or
lesser
danger
with
public
consumption.
Y
Yeah
I
think
that
would
be
one
area.
I
would
consider
to
be
keeping
a
watch
on
it.
You
know,
obviously
we
are
liberalizing
this
thing
and,
as
a
result,
the
consumption
should
go
up
and
people
will
be
driving
to
it
going
back.
So
that
would
be
an
area
to
keep
again
a
track
of
that.
What
it
is
going
to
do
in
terms
of
additional
work
on
your
people
and
additional
enforcements.
Y
Y
AE
P
Thank
you,
mayor
and
I'm
thankful
to
our
police
department,
pbce
and
OED
staff
for
bringing
forth
a
great
set
of
recommendations.
I'll
try
to
be
brief
and
speak
to
the
significant
impact
that
these
policy
changes
will
hopefully
bring
to
the
Cannabis
industry.
As
we
see
the
economic
forecasts
and
our
city
budget,
it's
clear
that
cannabis
is
underperforming.
I
mean
that
result
is
mainly
because
I
believe
we've
been
our
very
worst
enemy.
P
I'm
thankful
to
my
colleagues
who
have
come
together
to
draft
our
memo.
Thank
you
for
the
leadership
of
council
member
Foley,
who
is
the
queen
I
believe.
P
P
Just
a
few
questions,
one
is
I
know
that
obviously
there's
a
bill
going
through
the
state
legislature,
authored
by
assembly
member
Haney
for
I.
Think
they're
like
cannabis
lounges.
P
AD
Thanks
for
that
question,
so
we
are
watching
it
now.
I
must
admit:
it's
been
probably
a
couple
months
since
I've
checked
on
the
status,
so
I
will
have
to
go
back
and
check
the
status.
It
is
something
we're
watching
as
of
right
now
or
as
of
last
I
checked
it's
an
opt-in
bill,
so
you
know,
as
far
as
we
can
see
it,
would
it
would
give
the
city
the
option
to
to
move
toward
this
if
we
so
wanted.
So
we're
feeling
comfortable
with
that,
but
I
will
go
back
and
check
the
status.
P
Great,
that's
something
I'm
I'm,
just
anticipating
we
need
to
get
ready
for
and
then
also
there
was
an
article
published
in
Spotlight
today
that
had
language
talking
about
today's
vote,
and
there
was
someone
talking
about
the
clustering
of
the
the
Cannabis
shops
right
and
that
we're
talking
about
four
per
cluster.
But
then
my
understanding
is
there
could
be
some
overlap
to
to
those
clusters.
I
wanted
to
get
staff's
perspective.
To
think
like
are
we
are
we
potentially
Paving
the
way
for
like
a
cannabis,
District
or
something
like
do?
AD
Yeah
I
mean
so
four
per
thousand,
so
every
single
one
that
would
come
in
would
need
to
essentially
draw
that
thousand
foot
radius
around
themselves
and
around
all
the
other
ones
in
the
vicinity,
and
no
one's
thousand
foot
radius
could
end
up
with
more
than
four
now.
What
I
would
say
is
is
that
it
could
lead
to
kind
of,
as
you
march
down
the
street
right.
You
know
you
could
be
just
outside
of
it
or
there's
only
so
much
overlap,
so
it
could
potentially
be
a
stretch
of
them.
AD
P
But
but
just
hearing
what
you
said:
does
that
mean
there's
a
thousand
feet
between
each
shop
or
is
it
the
cluster
and
then
a
thousand
a
thousand
feet
around
the
cluster
I.
AD
P
Comes
out
a
thousand
feet,
okay,
but
is
there?
Is
there
room
for?
Could
they
possibly
overlap
within
that
I
guess?
Could
there
be
clusters
overlapping
each
other,
resulting
in
I,
don't
know
like
10
on
One
Street
in
one
District,
which
I
know
we
don't
want
to
repeat
which
somewhat
occurred
in
District
Seven.
AD
F
AD
Mean
the
the
thousand
foot
radius
with
each
other.
So
again
each
one
would
have
that
four
within
a
thousand,
so
you
know
a
thousand
feet.
Does
get
you
a
few?
A
couple
blocks,
usually
right.
So
so
again
you
know
as
you're
driving
down
you'll
kind
of
Imagine
a
thousand
feet.
They
could
start.
It
could
be
a
number,
for
example,
going
down
like
a
street
like
West,
San,
Carlos
or
or
Stevens.
Creek
is
just
those
come
to
mind.
T
Yeah
I
was
going
to
ask
us
a
similar
question.
I
mean
I,
understand
the
the
clustering,
the
four
per
thousand
my
question:
it's
just
more
about
you
know
single
shopping
centers,
for
example.
If
you
can
allow
for
a
shopping
center
owner,
says
hey.
This
is
good
revenue
and
I'm
willing
to
rent
to
as
many
as
want
to
come
here.
T
You
could,
in
theory,
have
four
in
one
Shopping
Center
in
one
strip
mall,
you
know
I'm,
not
I,
don't
want
to
necessarily
anticipate
that
there's
a
problem
or
that
that
maybe
doesn't
exist
or
that
or
maybe
it's
not
too
likely,
but
I.
Just
wonder
if
there's
some
in
between
about
you
know
a
number
per
individual
property
plus
the
thousand
foot.
So
some
way
to
prevent
you
know
four
in
a
row
four
next
to
each
other
or
four
within
one
single
front
facing
mall
or
maybe
maybe
we
would
argue
that
that's
not
a
problem.
AD
Definitely
when
we,
we
kind
of
showed
it
out
before
it
could
be
for
in
a
shopping
center
if
it's
a
larger
shopping
center.
That
could
happen
yes
under
the
four
in
a
thousand.
So
one
way
to
address
that
would
be.
You
could
have
the
concentration
and
then
add
back
that
strict
distance
between
each
other,
because
that's
going
to
start
kind
of
knocking
them
out
of
the
shopping
center,
you
could
limit
them
to
know
more
than
one
per
shopping
center
per
property.
T
AD
T
Okay,
I'll
guess:
I'll,
leave
it
to
that
and
see
what
if
anyone
else
feels
the
same
way.
B
C
B
C
M
C
M
AH
B
AJ
B
C
Hi
Ortiz
Davis,
yes,
dwan,
aye,
Candelas.
V
B
B
Okay,
thank
you
we're
on.
Thank
you
to
staff
for
all
your
work
on
this
I
know.
It's
been
a
long
journey,
okay,
we're
on
to
item
10.2,
a
rezoning
and
permit
property
located
at
1655,
Berryessa
Road,
and
we
have
a
short
presentation.
AK
AK
Just
a
quick
aside.
It's
almost
exactly
two
years
to
the
day
since
we
approved
the
Berryessa
Bart
Urban
Village
plan
that
really
set
the
stage
for
development
on
this
property.
By
designating
the
land
uses,
you
know
and
really
setting
out
the
layout
for
Development
Across
this
property.
So
I
know
that,
because
it
was
my
first
council
meeting
so
I'm
two
years
in
so
as
noted,
the
properties
at
1655
Berryessa
Road.
This
is
a
13
gross
Acre
Site,
it's
within
as
noted
the
Berryessa
Urban
Village
District.
AK
The
project
itself
really
is
made
up
by
a
number
of
components.
It's
a
plan,
development,
zoning
laying
out
the
the
master
plan
and
the
use
is
allowed.
It's
a
plan
development
permit
again
that
really
sort
of
lays
out
the
site
and
all
the
public
and
private
streets.
And
then
it's
a
vesting
tentative
map
that
merges
the
existing
three
Parcels
into
one
and
then
subdivides
it
to
accommodate
all
of
the
development.
The
project
includes
850
residential
units
across
a
couple
of
different
types.
AK
So
it's
it's
really
recognizing
a
significant
amount
of
density
in
the
multi-family
portion,
so
we're
looking
at
around
120
units
to
the
acre,
and
then
you
know,
with
a
it's
really
sort
of
looking
for
the
opportunity
to
respect
the
interface
with
the
surrounding
single-family
neighborhood
by
including
a
number
of
town,
homes
and
single-family
residences,
as
well
as
approximately
450
000
square
feet
of
commercial
uses.
AK
AK
So,
under
the
environmental
review,
we
did
complete
a
draft
environmental
impact
report
that
was
circulated
back
in
August
of
last
year.
It
identified
relevant
mitigation
measures
for
the
potential
impacts
disclosed
in
that
analysis,
around
air
quality
nesting,
bird
subsurface,
archaeological
resources,
hazards
hazardous
materials
from
past
uses
of
the
site,
as
well
as
construction,
related
noise
and
vibration.
The
mitigation
measures
included
in
the
monitoring
report
account
for
those
impacts.
AK
There
were
approximately
60
public
comments
on
the
draft
eir
that
included
concerns
related
to
air
quality
during
construction
and
operation,
as
well
as
Wetlands
noise
and
land
use.
Our
first
amendment
was
released
with
the
response
to
comments
back
in
April
of
this
year
and
based
on
the
comments
received,
no
recirculation
is
necessary,
so
staff's
recommendation
is
to
adopt
the
resolution
certifying.
The
eir
approve
an
ordinance
that
rezones
the
property
to
include
the
plan
development
rezoning,
as
well
as
adopting
resolutions
approving
subject
to
conditions,
the
vesting
tentative
map
and
the
plan
development
permit.
AK
I
did
just
want
to
take
a
second
to
acknowledge
the
memo
from
the
mayor
and
councilmember
Cohen.
A
couple
of
sort
of
important
points
in
there
and
I
want
to
ensure
that
I'm
reaffirming
the
Department's
commitment
to
work
with
Council
offices
relative
to
development
projects.
Obviously,
that
takes
on
a
number
of
different
forms
from
our
one-on-one
discussions.
AK
With
regards
to
how
we
prioritize
and
plan
for
density,
especially
with
our
Urban
Villages,
and
especially
in
relation
to
transit-rich
environments
and
those
areas
where
the
city
is
making
significant
commitments
to
Transit.
Obviously,
that's
a
conversation
that
begins
and
ends
in
the
general
plan.
So
as
we
assign
density
through
our
general
plan
process
throughout
the
city,
you
know
we
start
that
consideration.
In
this
case
there
is
an
Urban
Village
plan
in
place
right,
which
allowed
us
to
have
this
conversation
in
a
very
detailed
way
with
city
council.
AK
AK
Single
family
I
know
there's
some
concern
around
us
approving
single
family,
but
when
we
look
at
the
balance
of
this
site
and
the
and
the
real
increase
in
density
that
it
represents,
when
we
deliver
all
850
units,
you
know
that
that's
an
opportunity
to
really
Drive
residential
development
close
to
Transit.
So
we
look
at
that
site
in
its
entirety
and
the
mix
of
uses
so
obviously
we'll
we'll
continue
to
look
for
opportunities
to
raise
these
issues
and
and
have
continued
conversation
with
Council.
AK
Obviously,
as
we
prepare
the
next
set
of
Urban
Village
plans,
Five
Wounds
is
in
the
work
we're
going
to
move
forward
with
a
report
on
our
next
Market
ready,
Urban
Village
plan
in
August.
AK
So
each
of
those
plans
will
continue
to
have
these
conversations,
as
well
as
our
regular
report
to
the
community
and
economic
development
committee,
which
is
a
biannual
report
on
Urban
Villages
and
all
things
Citywide
planning.
So
with
that
staffs
available
for
questions
and
I
believe
the
applicant's
representative
Eric
schoenhower
is
available
for
their
statement
as
well.
B
AL
In
any
case,
good
evening,
mayor
Mayhem,
members
of
the
council,
my
name
is
Eric.
Shaneauer
I
represent
the
faccino
family
on
this
application
and
first
we
want
to
thank
the
staff
and
all
the
city
departments.
We've
been
working
on
this
project.
For
four
years
we
started
before
the
Urban
Village
plan
was
adopted
and
we're
all
in
total
alignment
with
the
project.
AL
So
we,
let's
see
hey,
I'm,
sorry,
that
this
high-tech
system
there
we
go
we're
in
we're
in
alignment
and,
as
the
Director
said,
the
Urban
Village
Berryessa,
Bart
Urban
Village
plan
was
adopted
two
years
ago
and
all
we're
doing
today
is
putting
in
place
the
necessary
entitlements
to
implement
that
plan
that
that
the
council
adopted
the
goal
is
to
have
a
mix
of
housing
types
within
walking
distance.
From
the
BART
station.
We
have
for
sale
housing,
we
have
rental
housing,
we
have
market
rate
housing,
we
have.
AL
We
have
affordable
housing
proposed
within
the
project.
We
per
the
plan.
We
have
commercial
space
that
will
front
on
Berryessa
Road
to
activate
the
street
and
there'll
be
a
new
neighborhood
park
within
the
development
and
I
just
want
to
show
you
the
Urban
Village
plan
documents.
So
this
is
the
conceptual
Urban
Design
plan.
The
fascino
property
is
at
the
bottom
left
cluster
of
buildings
there,
and
so
that
was
what
is
a
conceptual
vision
of
how
the
Urban
Village
plan
could
play
out,
and
this
is
a
close-up
of
the
faccino
property.
AL
So
you
can
see
the
blue
building
is
the
commercial
space
that
would
happen
along
Berryessa
Road.
The
taller
residential
buildings
Podium
buildings
could
could
be,
will
be
a
mix
of
affordable
market
and
for
sale
units.
As
the
Director
mentioned,
the
Plan
called
for
a
step
down
with
lower
residential
buildings
at
the
perimeter,
and
then
you
see
the
neighborhood
park
within
the
plan.
So
that's
what
was
conceptually
envisioned
for
the
plan,
and
this
is
our
site
plan
layout.
So
you
can
see
the
orientations
change,
but
on
the
right
is
Berryessa
Road.
AL
So
we
have
the
commercial
block.
We
have
three
Podium
residential
blocks.
We
have
the
towns
and
small
lot
single
fan
on
the
perimeter
and
we
have
the
park
so
we've
literally
just
replicated
the
Urban
Village
Urban
Village
plan
pretty
much
exactly
as
it
was
envisioned
when
the
council
adopted
it
and
just.
Lastly,
because
this
has
come
up
the
way
Urban
Village
plans
work
is
there,
are
land
use
designations
in
the
plan,
and
then
there
are
definitions
of
those
designations.
AL
So
the
perimeter
land
that
the
director
referenced
is
designated
mixed
use
neighborhood
and
you
can
see
the
definition
and
I
highlighted
the
fact
that
small
lot
single-family
homes
are
allowed
in
that
area
and
so,
regardless
of
what
other
words
are
used
elsewhere
in
The
Narrative
of
the
plan.
This
is
the
definition
of
what's
allowed
in
the
land
use
in
the
Urban
Village
plan,
and
so
because
of
that
staff
has
found
that
what's
being
proposed
is
conforms
to
the
plan,
and
so
for
all
of
those
reasons.
AL
C
E
Oh
thank
you
sort
of
on
the
Horseshoe
first
of
all,
I'd
like
to
know
how
many
parking
spaces
there
is
okay,
because
you
guys
con
people
into
believing
that
only
certain
neighborhoods
are
going
to
be
parking,
restricted
and
they're
going
to
be
minimized.
Now
my
estimation,
590
units
you
guys,
are
going
to
have
700
plus
parking
units
I
want
that
cut
in
half
and
I
want
that
on
the
record
right
now
how
many
parking
spaces
are
going
to
be
available
to
this
particular
developer?
E
That's
number
one
number
two:
is
this
market
rate
housing
number
three?
If
it
is
just
because
it's
part
of
this,
this
envisioned
plan
and
showing
hours
running
the
show
that
doesn't
mean
nothing.
What
it
means
is
is
he's
leveraged
power.
That's
all
it
is
and
circumvented
democracy,
that's
what
it
is.
He
has
leverage
power,
circumvent
democracy.
E
The
other
thing
is:
is
that
that
area
is
still
saturated
in
barriers
of
blood
that
has
never
been
amended,
never
been
accounted
for.
The
deeds
in
that
area
were
extracted
from
the
barriers
of
them,
and
so
so
like
like.
How
will
this
family
that's
in
charge
of
this?
This
sale,
where
did
they
get
this
D?
Where
did
how
did
they
inherit
that
property?
When
you
start
researching
that
you
will
find
it
will
lead
to
the
Berryessa
family
by
Brothers,
murdered
along
with
the
father
because
they
wanted
the
land?
E
AM
Good
evening
my
name
is
Aiden
Marshall
speaking
on
behalf
of
Silicon
Valley
residents
for
responsible
development,
Silicon
Valley
residents
urges
the
city
council
to
continue
today's
hearing
and
not
recommend
approval
of
the
project.
At
this
time
we
submitted
written
comments
on
the
draft
in
final
eir,
which
explains
that
the
eir
fails
to
adequately
analyze
and
mitigate
significant
environmental
impacts.
These
include
Public
Health
impacts
from
diesel,
particulate
matter
and
soil
contamination.
AM
Further,
the
city's
housing
conditions
of
approval
fail
to
require
the
project
to
construct
on-site,
affordable
housing
instead
allowing
the
applicant
to
Forfeit
a
bond
as
an
in-loo
fee.
Perhaps
years
after
the
project
is
approved.
This
failure
renders
the
project
inconsistent
with
local
policies
calling
for
on-site,
affordable
housing
for.
AL
AM
The
barriers
of
Bart
Urban
Village
plan
includes
a
25,
affordable,
housing
policy
goal.
This
project
will
not
be
consistent
or
helpful
towards
this
goal
if
it
pays
the
in-loo
fee
instead
of
building
the
units
on
site.
Further
payments
of
an
in-loo
fee
would
not
help
the
city
meet
its
current
and
Urgent
Regional
Housing
needs
allocation
needs
due
to
these
impacts
and
general
planning
consistencies.
The
city
cannot
make
the
findings
necessary
to
approve
the
Project's
entitlements.
AM
AB
AB
Things
like
that
and
I'm
sure
that
if
we
were
doing
developments
for
Market
rates,
we
would
be
looking
into
it
and,
if
there's
lack
of
support
from
other
council
members,
it
just
kind
of
has
a
lot
to
say,
because
it
would
appear
that
it's
just
in
those
areas
and
I
just
want
to
have
a
better
understanding
of
what
this
is.
AB
What's
going
on
because
I
mean
I
have
I
have
worked
in
affordable
housing
for
a
very
long
time
and
I
have
plenty
of
experience
in
it
and
I
just
want
to
know
what
the
issues
are
and
what
exactly
you
are
doing,
and
you
know
I
understand
that
it's
commercial
in
you
know
in
additional
units.
But
what
is
the
percentage
if
there
is
affordable
housing?
What's
the
percentage
of
housing
now
with
regards
to
the
parking?
If
it
would
be
for
affordable
housing,
then
you
know.
AB
Sometimes
you
need
more
parking
stalls
like
at
the
property
where
I
work,
it
was
85
units
and
we
had
about
115
parking
stalls,
so
I,
just
I,
guess
I
believe
I
just
would
like
to
have
those
questions
answered.
Thank
you
very
much.
AF
Good
evening,
I,
don't
know
a
lot
about
this
project
because
guess
what
I've
been
concentrating
on
defending
measure
e,
just
like
the
rest
of
the
affordable
housing
ecosystem,
and
this
item
needs
to
be
continued
because
I
wouldn't
be
I
would
not
be
surprised
if
the
whole
attack
on
measure
e
was
just
meant
to
distract
us
from
other
issues
like
this
project.
The
police
budget,
the
sjpoa
Scandal,
and
this
needs
to
be
continued
until
a
time
when
all
interested
parties
have
had
an
opportunity
to
analyze
all
the
existing
documents.
Thank
you.
C
R
Here
you
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
this
is
the
housing
development
project.
That's
around
the
flea
market
area
is
my
understanding
and
Eric.
Schoenhauer
I
think
is
in
charge
of
it
and
it's
been
to
planning
the
Planning
Commission
it's
been
approved
and
it
was.
It
was
an
important
point
of
myself
that
I
feel
that
is
for
as
much
as
the
the
Flea
Market
vendors
can
be
working
around
the
development
of
the
future
of
the
flea
market
area
itself.
R
I
hope
they
can
be
allowed
to
lend
their
voice
and
add
their
voice
to
this
area
as
well
as
it
will
be
related
to
the
flea
market
and
it's
important
to
allow
the
Flea
Market
vendors
to
feel
they
are
really
a
part
of
the
process
and
I
hope
we
can
be
accepting
of
that
concept
and
I
want
to
work
towards
that
sort
of
concept
and
when
we
do
I
think
we'll
be
really
building
the
future
of
this
area.
R
AN
Yes,
I
would
like
to
see
how
many
affordable
house
in
this
unit
is
gonna,
have
I've
been
trying
to
find
out
and
I
can
I
cannot
find
it.
That's
one
thing,
and
another
thing
is
if
it's
gonna
have
commercial
space
and
it's
about
close
to
the
Berryessa
like
Blair
just
said,
I
would
like
to
see
some
type
of
commitment
from
the
developer
to
to
to
to
show
some
good
faith
to
to
try
to
offer
some
of
those
spaces
to
to
the
people
and
the
in
the
independence
from
the
flea
market.
AN
That
will
be
maybe
a
good
concept
that
we
can
start
using
or
how
we
can
start
trying
to
help
those
that
are
going
to
be
this
place
to
try
to
find
them
places
and
new
nice
spaces,
like
the
ones
that
they
are
building
right
there
in
front
of
the
flea
market
too.
You
know
all
of
those
things
are
empty
right,
the
other
day,
I
drove
by
there
and
they're
all
empty.
Let's
try
to
get
our
people
and
try
in
those
spaces.
You
know
in
affordable
housing.
AN
T
All
right,
thank
you.
Well
I'm
excited
that
this
Project's
moving
forward
it
it's
the
probably
the
closest
property
to
the
BART
station
of
any
property-
that's
been
developed
so
far,
and
it's
not
at
all
related
to
the
flea
market.
It's
not
a
flea
market
owned
site.
It's
a
another
private,
the
own
site,
next
door.
It
is
right
along
the
BART
tracks
and
right
across
the
street
from
the
BART
station.
So
it's
a
good
place
to
build
housing.
T
I
have
a
question
for
the
applicant
first.
Of
course,
people
have
been
asking
about
affordable
housing,
but
I
was
going
to
ask
about
this.
What
is
the
current
expectation
for
number
of
affordable
housing
units
on
site,
at
least?
What's
the
what's?
The
hope.
AL
Well,
the
well
originally
when
we
started
this
project,
the
goal
was
simply
to
provide
the
the
15
or
20
that's
required
on
site
in
a
standalone
building.
AL
However,
we've
found
a
development
partner
that
may
be
interested
in
doing
more
than
that,
so
our
goal
is
to
have
two
Podium
buildings
with
affordable
that
will
have
over
600
affordable
units
within
those
buildings.
That's
our
goal.
There
are
no
guarantees,
because,
ultimately
we
have
to
finance
that,
but
that
is
what
our
intentions
that
we've
submitted
to
the
housing
department
in
our
affordable
housing
compliance
plan
and
we're
hopeful
that
we
can
achieve
that
great.
T
T
We
can
get
that
Park
and
I
know
that
at
some
point
you,
you
talked
about
pickleball
there,
so
that
would
be
exciting
since
I
just
learned
today
that
we
have
zero
pickleball
courts
and
they
got
26
in
District
9..
So
so
anyway,
thank
you
for
your
commitment
to
the
neighborhood
and
and
thank
thanks
to
the
family
for
their
commitment
to
doing
affordable
housing
on
site
I'm
hopeful
hopeful.
T
It
will
work
out,
and
hopefully
we'll
figure
out
how
to
finance
that
I
want
to
just
say
to
the
housing,
the
planning
staff
and
to
the
applicant.
The
memo
that
we
submitted
is
not
at
all
an
indictment
or
criticism
of
the
process
that
was
followed.
The
process
was
followed,
as
outlined
the
process,
the
the
zoning
was
followed
by
the
applicant
I.
T
Think
what's
happening,
of
course,
is
that
there's
a
reevaluation
in
our
minds
across
the
city
about
the
appropriateness
of
single-family
homes,
anywhere,
let
alone
in
an
area
right
next
to
the
transit
Hub
of
Berryessa
I
mean
it's
not
just
a
bar
station,
but
it's
the
transit
Hub
in
northeast
San,
Jose,
so
I
think
it
I
think
we
were
just
thinking
through
how.
T
So
maybe
the
the
ask
in
the
memo
is
mainly
let's
think
about
that,
and
let's
come
back
and
talk
about
that
with
Council
about
what
we
might
be
able
to
do
to
allow
the
council
to
reevaluate
or
allow
individual
council
members
to
look
at
that
site
and
say
hey.
Maybe
we
want
to
rethink
what
we
had
said
back
when
this
site
was
zoned
with
that
I'm
going
to
move
the
memo
that
councilmember
that
mayor
Mayhem
and
myself
submitted
and
look
forward
to
this
project
moving
forward.
Second,.
B
Great
thanks,
council,
member
and
I'll
just
Echo
everything
councilmember
just
said:
Thank
you
to
the
applicant.
The
Petrino
family
really
appreciate
their
commitment
to
this
mixed-use
development
that
includes
the
affordable
on
site,
which
is
a
great
win,
and
thank
you
to
staff
for
the
work
you've
done
and
I
think
you
know
just
to
add
to
what
councilmember
Cohen
said
you
know.
I
think
often
the
applicant
is,
is
rightly
going
to
be
incentivized
to
just
go
with
the
path
of
least
resistance.
B
We
certainly
want
to
send
that
be
as
early
in
the
process
as
possible
to
let
the
applicant
know
that
that's
something
that
at
least
politically
we're
very
open
to
just
this
is
a
perfect
site
where
in
many
ways
the
denser
the
better
just
given
the
proximity
to
this
multi-billion
dollar
Transit
investment,
but
but
but
agreed,
the
process
was
followed
as
outlined,
and
this
is
a
conversation
for
future
projects.
J
I,
just
I
just
want
to
get
a
few
numbers
clear,
so
this
is
going
to
be
24
single
family
homes
at
market
rate,
24
Town
Homes
at
market
rate
590
condo
units
at
market
rate
is
that
correct.
AK
J
For
the
entire
site,
including
the
single
family
and
the
24
okay,
so
the
total
number
is
850.
So
some
of
the
the
590
condo
units
will
be
foreign
Market
or
see
the
the
thing
is
that
it
specifies
it
specifies
that
there
will
be
up
to
590
Condominiums
right,
so
I'm,
just
trying
to
figure
out
the
math
in
terms
of
how
much
is
left
for,
affordable,
right
and
I.
Think
that
it's
it's
great,
that
you
know
there
could
be
approximately
600
units
of
affordable.
J
J
So
that's
number
one
number
two
I
I
feel
that
it's
unfortunately
and
I
I
understand
how
this
all
came
to
be
and
and
how
things
were
set
up
in
the
past
and
all
of
that
and
the
step
down
design
and
all
of
that
I
wish
I
would
have
had
it
at
El
Paseo.
So
you
know
there
you
go,
but
in
terms
of
densities,
I
think
it's
a
big
problem,
because
this
is
a
loss
opportunity
in
a
major
major
Transit
Hub
right.
We
should
the
densities
on
this
should
be.
Super
duper
high
right.
J
So,
while
I
understand
how
it
came
to
be
and
I
I
will
support
this
I
I
really
think
that
it
is
done
in
a
way
that
it
is
not
appropriate,
especially
in
a
Transit
Hub
area,
so
there
and
then
the
other
thing
is
that
we've
gone
through
a
lot
in
terms
of
affordable
housing.
When
are
we
going
to
get
the
affordable
housing?
When
are
they
going
to
build
it?
J
And
all
that
I
would
like
to
see
and
and
I'd
ask
council
member
Colin
if
we
could
make
the
affordable
part
as
part
of
condition
of
approval,
because
if
we
don't
have
it
as
a
condition
of
approval,
I
don't
know
that
we're
going
to
get
it.
You
know
it's
sort
of
a
wish
and
well
maybe,
and
how
and
and
all
of
that
so
I
could
be
wrong
right
and
maybe
that's
great,
you
know
I'm
fine
being
wrong,
but
but
I,
but
I
think
that
we
we
Bank
on
these
wishes
of
affordability
and
having
affordable.
J
And
oh,
isn't
this
great
we're
going
to
have
affordable
housing
near
the
BART,
and
then
it
doesn't
happen
right
for
whatever
reason
so
I
think
as
a
condition
of
approval.
A
certain
percentage
on-site
has
to
be
built
for
affordable
and
we
will
get
affordable.
If
not
I
mean
maybe
they
won't
build
it
and
and
I
understand
that
that's
a
trade-off
right,
but
I
think
that
at
some
point
we're
going
to
have
to
decide
whether
having
affordable
on-site
is
what
we
want,
especially
on
a
Transit
Corridor.
J
So
I
would
ask
if,
if
you
would
add
that,
if
not
that's
okay
too,
but
I
think
that
it
would
be
very,
very
good
for
us
to
say
how
serious
we
are
to
ensuring
that
we
have
affordable
housing,
especially
along
Transit
corridors.
J
T
T
The
590
was
the
original
plan
in
terms
of
what
was
zoned
for
that
property
that
you
could
do
590
and
then
you
would
do
the
20,
affordable
inclusionary,
but
the
commit
the
the
plan
now
is
that
right
and
that
the
plan
now
is
to
almost
flip
that
and
build
far
more
affordable
than
that
590,
and
that
20
number.
AL
I'm
not
exactly
sure
which
numbers
the
vice
mayor
is
reading,
but
I
can
speculate
that
what's
going
on
with
the
numbers
is
that
there
are
descriptions
for
the
tentative
map
and
the
tentative
map
has
590
potential
Lots,
because
it's
standard
practice
when
you
build
Apartments
to
map
them
for
future
potential
sale.
AL
Okay,
that's
just
a
technicality.
The
reality
in
this
project
is,
is
the
zoning
and
the
eir
allow
up
to
850
units
of
those
850
48
are
the
town
home
and
small
lot
single
family
for
sale,
105
Podium
Condominiums
are
for
sale,
those
are
all
planned
to
be
built
by
KB
and
and
are
all
for
sale.
And
then
the
other
two
blocks
are
the
remainder
of
the
units
that
were
currently
our
goal
is
to
make
them
all
at
a
level
of
affordability,
that's
80
percent
or
below,
and
there's
a
mix
of
of
percentages.
AL
T
T
Market
rate
and
just
one
building
of
affordable
what
what
the
current
plan
is,
is
to
convert
that
big
center
block,
which
was
actually
market
rate
on
the
map
to
an
affordable
building
which
would
be
all
affordable.
That
would
be
very
exciting
if
it
were
to
happen.
So
let
me
ask
a
question
now
of
a
planning
department
to
follow
up
on
the
second
part
of
this
I
mean
obviously
we'd
like
some
enforceable
commitment
for
the
affordable.
T
We
know
that
the
way
this
gets
built
is
that
the
market
rate
gets
billed
first
to
pay
for
the
infrastructure,
and
then
you
know
they're
looking
for
the
financing
to
hopefully
get
the
affordable
and
that-
and
we
all
have
that
objective.
What
kind
of
enforcement
mechanism
would
there
be
at
a
point
at
which,
if
we
were
to
to
put
in
a
a
requirement
if,
at
that
point,
there's
no
there's
no
financing
to
do
the
affordable
above
at
the
level
that
we
require.
AK
So,
there's
a
couple
of
components
to
how
we're
sort
of
dealing
with
the
affordable.
Obviously,
the
requirements
for
affordable
development
on
any
property
are
governed
by
the
inclusionary
housing
ordinance,
which
includes
a
number
of
different
compliance
options
and
there's
a
whole
history
behind
how
we
arrived
at
that
point.
AK
So,
typically,
what
we
do
in
the
land
use
permits
in
our
plan
development
permit
would
be
to
reference
that
affordable
housing
compliance
plan
in
this
instance
and
then
typically,
what
we
do
is
we
specify
the
timing
relative
to
that.
So
in
this
instance,
we
were
looking
at
different
options,
and
so
that's
why
there's
a
slightly
different
condition
relative
to
the
bonding
as
far
as
enforcement,
so
I'm
going
to
ask
for
an
assist
from
the
attorneys
on
this
one.
AK
You
know.
Obviously,
Council
has
the
ability
to
request
things
of
the
developer
that
we
can
include
as
part
of
conditions
of
approval,
and
then
that
would
be
you
know
as
we
move
through
the
process.
That
would
be
a
requirement
prior
to
issuance
of
building
permit,
so
it
would
condition
it
in
that
sense.
As
far
as
I
would
let
the
applicant
speak
to
their
response
to
that
request
from
Council
foreign.
T
AJ
Evening,
Council
Johnny
Fan,
City
attorney's
office.
Yes,
in
terms
of
enforcement,
it's
really
two
enforcement
mechanism.
One
is
we
can
withhold
building
permits
on
the
project
from
moving
forward
and
the
Elder
is
the
applicant
you
would.
We
need
to
go
through
the
amendment
process
on
the
entitlements
if
they
want
to
do
something
different,
okay,.
T
So
we
can
put
it
in
the
entitlements
now
we
can
certainly,
obviously,
if,
if,
if
the
project
doesn't
get,
if
the
pro
only
the
market
rate
gets
built,
there's
still
an
occlusionary
fee
requirement
that
would
have
to
be
paid
if
the
project
got
walked
away
from
anyway,
but
but
presume
clearly,
I
wouldn't
necessarily
want
to
put
conditions
on
that
say
you
have
to
build
the
600,
because
that's
what
you
mean
that
that's
a
that's
a
voluntary
commitment
that
they're
making
to
us
that's
Way,
Beyond.
What
the
requirement
is.
Is
there
a?
T
Would
it
be
an
acceptable
to
say
to
the
for
the
20
15
to
20
number
to
be
put
in
as
conditions
of
approval
I
mean
I.
Do
need
to
understand
that
in
terms
of
how
that
could
work
for
for
the
applicant
before
you
know,
trying
to
put
something
into
the.
AO
If
I
could
jump
in
Rachel,
vandereen
assistant
director
with
the
housing
department,
I
think
that
what
one
condition
of
approval
that
would
I
think
meet
the
spirit
of
what
what
I
hear
you
trying
to
do
tonight
would
be
to
to
require
the
building
of
affordable
on
site,
because,
again
the
that's
really
what
is
exciting
and
that's
what
we've
been
working
with
the
applicant
on
and
and
that's
really
what
we
would
like
to
see.
AO
Honestly,
it's
really
our
goal
to
build,
affordable
housing
through
this
policy
fees
are
great,
but
that's
really
not
the
ultimate
goal.
Because
again,
this
is
right.
It's
it's
a
fantastic
site
to
have
a
range
of
incomes.
Have
people
in
our
residents
be
able
to
live
right
here
by
this
Transportation
opportunity,
so
so
a
statement
of
having
even
15
or
20
percent
on
site
built
on
site?
That
is
what
we
would
be
looking
for.
So.
T
Yeah,
that
was
what
I
was
getting
at,
so
the
required
level
would
be
would
be
a
condition
of
approval,
but
anything
beyond
that
would
be
the
voluntary
projects
that
the
developer
does,
but
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
condition
the
project
on
the
600
units.
We
condition
it
on
the
required
level
of
inclusionary
housing
that
we
have
in
our
city
policy.
T
I
know
I
understand
I'm,
just
looking
at
you
and
I
guess:
I'm
I
I'm
looking
to
Eric
to
see
you
know
how
this
affects
the
project,
but
but
I'm
happy
I'm
willing
to
consider
that.
But
I
want
to
make
sure
that
you
know
we're
not.
AL
T
I
appreciate
that
I
mean,
and
obviously
we
don't
like
to
Spring
these
things
on
at
the
last
minute.
At
this
meeting,
so
I
mean
and
look
I
was
excited
about
this
project
because
of
the
voluntary
commitment
that
was
being
made
to
try
for
the
600
plus
affordable
housing
units
on
this
site,
which
would
obviously
far
exceed
any
requirement
that
we
would
have
and
far
exceed
anything
that
we
would
ever
impose.
So
you
know
I
wasn't
having
further
conversations
about
the
affordable
part
part.
B
Yeah
and
just
to
just
to
add
on
I
mean
Rachel.
Can
you
just
share
with
us
when
the
council
last
updated
the
roughly,
when
we
last
updated
the
the
inclusionary
housing
ordinance,
because
we
had
this
conversation?
I
know
we
have
a
lot
of
new
council
members,
but
roughly
for
anybody
in
the
box.
When
did
we
last
update
it?
What
were
the
broad
Contours
of
the
updates
we
made
and
how
would
it
be
best
for
if
the
council
wanted
to
ensure
the
projects
had
some
on-site
and
there's
a
lot
of
challenges
with
that?
B
AO
All
right,
so
we
did
do
a
a
lot
of
work
over
the
last
like
three
to
five
years
of
and
really
looking
at
the
inclusionary
program,
and
we
did
it
kind
of
an
overhaul.
We
did
the
majority
of
the
work
in
2019
and
we
did
some
updates
in
2021.
So
that's
like
really
when
we
did
the
most
work
on
this
ordinance
as
I'm.
Just
in
answering
your
question
about.
AO
What's
the
best
way
to
think
about
this
policy,
I
do
think
that
we,
since
we've
done
the
overhaul
we've
seen
more
interesting
things
come
up.
To
be
honest
right,
I
mean
I,
think
that
this
is.
AO
This
is
an
example
of
a
very
interesting
proposal
and-
and
we
have
we've
seen
Creative
Solutions
and
responses
to
the
changes
that
we've
made
in
the
ordinance
that
are
really
kind
of
exciting,
and
so
so
I
think
that
you
know
we
could
in
in
the
coming
year
or
whatever
go
ahead
and
take
a
look
at
the
policy
and
I
think
what
we
should
do
is
look
at
what
we've
learned
since
the
changes,
because
the
proposals
that
we've
seen
have
evolved
from
what
we
were
seeing
prior
to
those
changes.
Okay,.
B
Thank
you
and
I
assume,
if
we're
doing
that
would
probably
just
to
account
for
trade-offs
and
staff
and
all
the
rest
I'm
going
to
come
to
you
next
Johnny
I
would
assume
we
might
want
to
get
that
on.
The
the
appropriate
committee
CD,
for
example,
on
the
work
plan,
give
staff
the
runway
to
come
back
with
some
analysis,
have
the
discussion
in
a
committee
and
then
bring
something
forward
to
the
council
once
we've
had
time
to
bake
it.
AJ
On
yeah
so
just
to
provide
some
background,
our
inclusionary
housing
ordinance
was
adopted
back
in
2010
and
it
was
litigated
all
the
way
to
the
California
Supreme
Court
and
we
prevailed
because
I
think
Eric
is
correct.
We're
not
allowed
to
impose
a
requirement
on
the
developer
in
terms
of
whether
they
provide
on-site
inclusionary,
pay,
the
fees
or
dedicate
land.
However,
our
position
is,
we
are
not
imposing
here.
What
happened
is
as
part
of
the
planning
application.
AJ
The
applicant
is
required
to
submit
a
compliance
plan,
affordable
compliance
plan
application
and
in
that
application
they
set
forth
how
they
would
like
to
comply
with
inclusionary
housing.
Ordinance
is
something
that
is
totally
voluntary.
You
can
check
the
box
and
say
I'm
paying
fees.
You
can
see
I'm
dedicating
land.
You
can
say
I'm
going
to
do
on-site
inclusion.
There
was
some
combination
thereof
and
in
improving
the
project
we
are
simply
memorializing
what
they
submitted
to
the
city.
AJ
J
Thank
you
and
you
know,
I
agree
with
Eric.
This
is
probably
not
to
you
know,
sort
of
pick
on
just
one
project.
We
probably
need
a
better
larger
discussion,
but
this
is
what's
before
us,
you're
asking
us
for
up
to
850
units,
so
I
think
that
we
have
to
weigh
the
decisions
here
on
whether
to
grant
that
or
not
I
know
that
staff
has
gone
through
the
whole
process
and
our
ordinance
and
all
of
that.
J
But
I
also
think
that
if
we
are
serious
about
affordable
housing,
we
need
to
really
step
it
up,
and
the
best
thing,
as
Rachel
said,
is
to
have
it
on
site.
I.
Think
it's
great
I
totally
agree
with
my
fellow
council
member
calling
that
it'll
be
great
if
it's
all
done,
but
we
can't
live
in
a
wish
world
right
and
so
as
far
as
I'm
concerned.
J
J
For
me,
it's
important
to
memorialize
those
things,
because
it's
it's
amazing,
how
things
change
and
all
of
a
sudden,
oh
well,
that
was
then
this
is
now
so
I
tend
to
you
know,
take
the
moment
and
and
like
I
said,
I
would
prefer
this
to
be
much
more
dense
right,
I
mean
I'm
going
to
live
with
a
10
11
story,
unit
991
units
over
at
El
Paseo,
which
has
none
of
the
Transit
orientation
that
this
area
has,
and
so
my
feeling
is,
you
know
what
are
we
doing?
J
K
AK
All
right,
sorry
excuse
me
thanks,
council
member
yeah,
that
I
think
that's
a
good
question.
It
really
is
a
case
of
if
there's
an
intent
to
bring
back
individual
projects
through
some
kind
of
process
to
the
full
city
council.
Then.
X
AK
You
know,
as
stated,
you
know,
we
do
as
a
department
try
and
coordinate
very
closely
with
each
of
the
council
offices
on
all
of
the
development
applications
that
come
in
and
we
provide
that
list
on
a
monthly
basis
and
kind
of
talk
through
the
key
issues.
So
if
it's
more
kind
of
through
that
informal
process,
then
I
think
you
know
that
that's
definitely
something
we
already
accommodate.
But
if
there's
an
intent
to
have
some
form
of
additional
process,
then
then
yes,
that
potentially
slows
us
down.
AK
AK
But
you
know
just
on
average:
it's
really
the
time
it
would
take.
If
there
was
an
intent
for
us
to
formalize
some
process,
it
would
be
the
time
it
takes
to
sort
of
get
through
a
memo
process
and
bring
it
to
council
with.
AK
Well
and
again,
council
member
I,
think
you
know
our
intent
as
a
department
is
always
to
sort
of
provide
as
much
transparency
and
opportunity
for
feedback
throughout
the
process
for
the
city
council,
as
well
as
for
the
community
stakeholders
in
our
work
with
the
development
community
directly.
So
we
you
know,
we
believe
that
we,
we
do
a
good
job
of
that
right.
Now
we're
open
to
conversations
about
how
we
can
improve.
AK
So
you
know
I,
think,
sort
of
looking
at
that
existing
process
and
continuing
to
evolve.
It
would
be
the
most
appropriate
Way
Forward.
B
Sorry,
councilor
batra.
Y
Y
I
really
couldn't
figure
out
what
was
really
being
committed.
I
can
see
the
all
the
possibilities
over
there
that
we
make
it
590
apartment,
condos,
Town,
Homes,
This
and
That
Could.
Somebody
describe
what
is
really
the
proposal
today
if
they
were
going
to
go
forward
Because
by
the
way
this
was
a
project.
AK
Sorry,
council,
member,
so
as
far
as
the
what
Inc,
what
is
included
in
the
project?
Yes,
so
currently
it's
a
mixed
use
project
that
has
three
components.
The
first
is
our.
AK
Sorry
mixed-use
neighborhood
component,
which
is
48
units
comprised
of
both
single-family
and
town
homes
and
that
sit
around
two
sides
of
the
periphery
of
the
side.
Then,
in
the
Transit
employment
center
there
is
455,
000
square
feet
of
commercial
uses
and
then
the
balance
of
the
850
units
or
802
units
approximately
at
a
higher
density
configuration
as
the
applicant
noted,
I,
think
there's
105
units
in
one
block
and
then
the
balance
in
the
remaining
two
blocks.
That
sits
roughly
at
around
120
units
per
acre,
and
it
also
includes
a
public
park.
Y
AK
So
there's
a
number
of
opportunities
for
them
to
meet
to
satisfy
the
requirements
of
the
inclusionary
housing
ordinance
at
its
minimum.
It's
15
of
the
units
on
site
are
affordable
or
they
can
pay
the
in-lu
fee
on
20
of
the
total
units,
or
there
are
other
options
related
to
off-site
provision
of
affordable
housing,
I'll,
let
Rachel
at
any
context.
AK
AO
So
again,
as
part
of
the
process
to
come
to
this
point,
for
you
today
is
the
applicant
goes
through
and
actually
completes
an
affordable
housing
compliance
plan,
and
in
this
case
the
developer
came
forward
and
recommended
that
out
of
the
850
units,
697
of
them
would
be
affordable
and
what
they
did
is
actually
worked
with
us
to
to
come
in
under
an
alternative
method.
AO
One
of
the
reasons
for
that
is
because
there
are
going
to
be
several
town,
homes
and
condos,
and
the
sizes
of
those
units
are
quite
large,
like
the
square
footage,
and
so
what
they
were
thinking
about,
doing
was
building
more
units
than
would
be
required,
but
but
the
sizes
would
be
smaller
in
comparison
to
the
town
home
size,
because
these
are
going
to
be
rental
apartments.
And
so
so
we
had
a
you
know,
kind
of
a
back
and
forth
conversation
several
times
with
the
with
the
applicant
and
and
essentially
the
night.
AO
The
697
units
are
broken
between
Studios
one
and
two
bedrooms,
and-
and
we
felt
that
because
of
the
large
number
of
affordable,
that
it
was
really
meeting
a
greater
public
purpose
because
it
did
not
meet
some
of
the
requirements
of
the
order.
The
typical
requirements
which
were
related
to
the
size
so
anyway.
So
essentially,
they
were
making
some
trade-offs
between
the
size
and
number
of
affordable
units,
and
this
is
what
we
came
to
and
agreed
to
in
their
compliance
plan.
AO
Y
AJ
What
I
will
tell
you
is
the
conditions
of
approval
that
is
in
the
draft
resolution
is
not
crystal
clear
on
memorializing
this
commitment
from
the
compliance
plan,
so
I
think
it's
generically
says
that
they
will
comply
with
the
inclusionary
housing
ordinance,
but
it's
not
specific
on
referencing
the
specific
compliance
plan.
I
do
think
that
if
we
want
to
make
sure
the
developer
is
complying
with
the
submitted
compliance
plan,
then
yeah
we
would
need
to
tweak
the
language
in
the
conditions
of
approval.
Y
I
I
don't
think
we
want
to
impose
any
special
conditions
on
this
project,
but
we
do
want
to
understand
what
this
project
is
committing
to,
because
we
will
walk
away
from
this
conversation
that
in
hopefully
a
couple
of
years
we're
going
to
have
697,
affordable
units
and
if
there's
no
commitment
it
may
be
that
we
have
none
like
the
vice
mayor,
has
ex
Express
so
I'm
trying
to
get
what
is
really
the
commitment
I'm,
not
imposing
any
new
conditions.
Yeah.
B
Can
I
just
confirm
right
now
unless
something
were
to
change
and
we'd
want
to
hear
the
input
of
the
applicant
I
think,
but
under
the
current
approach
and
the
motion
on
the
floor,
the
commitment,
as
with
any
other
project
that
we
approve
is
they
have
to
adhere
to
the
inclusionary
housing
ordinance,
which
means
that
ultimately,
there
is
a
and
I
haven't
done.
The
math
on
this
I
don't
know
the
hard
numbers,
but
there
is
a
certain
number
of
affordable
units
or
a
certain
value
worth
of
fees
that
this
project
would
have
to
pay.
B
That
is
that
is
a
formula
in
the
ordinance
based
on
how
much
market
rate
they
build
now
they've
laid
out
a
vision
that
is
much
more
ambitious.
That
I
think
we're
excited
about,
but,
as
the
applicant
has
said,
they
don't
have.
Nor
do
most
applicants
at
this
stage
have
the
funding
the
financing
in
place
to
do
all
of
that.
B
So
yes,
I,
think
I.
Think
the
concern
that's
been
raised
is
a
very
fair
one
that
there's
a
very
ambitious
Vision
here
that
we're
all
excited
about,
but
that
may
or
may
not
be
financable
the.
What
is
the
commitment
is
the
ordinance
that
we
passed
that
we
have
imposed
on
all
projects.
We
have
a
waiver
for
downtown
that
changes
the
rules
a
little
bit
for
downtown
high-rise
specifically,
but
is
that
accurate?
Can
somebody
just
repeat
back
to
me
if
I'm
missing
anything
there.
G
Deputy
director
for
planning,
Robert
Manford
Mr
Mayor,
what
he
said
is
correct,
but
what
we
also
must
understand
is
that
this
is
a
master
plan.
It's
a
PD
zoning
so
later
on.
The
applicant
is
going
to
have
to
come
for
individual
permits,
PD
permits
and
at
that
point
we'll
have
to
ensure
that
iho
is
actually
complied
with,
because
as
a
stance
most
of
the
times,
this
is
at
the
back
end
of
planning.
So
the
numbers
are
not
available
until
they
come
for
the
PD
permits.
B
Right
and
they
may
come
forward
first
or
only
with
financing
for
a
market
rate
project,
and
they
may
decide
to
fulfill
our
inclusionary
ordinance
with
some
on-site
units
that
they
figured
out
how
to
finance
or
potentially
with
just
in-lu
fees.
I
guess.
The
point
is
to
impose
something
beyond
the
ordinance
we
have
I.
Think
we'd
want
to
step
back
and
take
a
look
at
the
ordinance
and
say:
is
it
as
strong
as
we
want
it
to
be?
Does
it
incentivize
on
site
as
much
as
we
want?
B
What
are
the
trade-offs
if
we
were
to
go
that
direction?
I'm
just
I'm
getting
concerned
that
the
line
of
questioning
is
trying
to
lead
us
to
on
the
Fly
modifying
an
ordinance
that
we've
spent
a
lot
of
time
and
effort
and
had
a
lot
of
input
in
designing
and
it's
maybe
not
perfect,
maybe
needs
to
be
updated,
but
I
feel
like
we're
back
to
where
we
were
20
minutes
ago.
In
the
conversation
Johnny,
you
want.
AJ
To
jump
in
again
go
ahead,
yeah
I
just
want
to
clarify,
so
the
developer
has
a
lot
of
different
options
in
terms
of
needing
inclusionary
housing
ordinance.
In
this
instance.
What
happened
was
the
developer?
Couldn't
meet
all
the
different
requirements
under
the
iho,
so
they
submitted
a
compliance
plan
as
what's
called
an
alternative,
is
that
we
can't
meet
all
the
strict
requirements
so
we're
going
to
give
you
an
alternative
that
gives
you
extraordinary
benefit
going
above
and
beyond
your
normal
15
on
site.
So
it's
not
that
we're
rewriting
the
ordinance.
AJ
AJ
AJ
The
iho
the
city
manager,
has
authority
to
make
minor
modification
to
the
approved
compliance
plan.
If
there's
significant
modification,
it
goes
back
through
the
approval
process
again.
So
here,
when
Council
approved
this
compliance
plan,
let's
say
they
come
in
and
say
we
just
want
to
pay
fees.
Our
position
is
that's
a
significant
change
of
the
compliance
plan
that
was
approved
by
Council.
It
would
need
to
go
through
the
approval
process
again
that
and
what
I'm
saying
is
I
think
the
ordinance
is
clear
on
that.
AJ
AJ
The
murky
is
the
conditions
of
approval
language
in
the
resolutions.
We
just
have
generic
language.
That
says,
you
need
to
comply
with
the
iho
I
see,
and
so
that's,
where
I
think
things
can
be
clarified,
but
I
think
it's
clear
in
the
ordinance
that
they
went
through
a
process.
They
couldn't
meet
the
requirements.
They
submitted
a
compliance
plan,
that's
being
approved
as
part
of
this
project.
Is
there
significant
change?
It
needs
to
go
back
to
the
city
council,
okay,.
Y
Were
yeah
so
I
just
want
to
go
ahead.
Thank
you,
man
for
clarifying
that
and,
as
we
said,
we
are
not
trying
to
create
new
policies
on
the
fly.
So
the
last
clarification
which
was
given
that
we
got
on
that
alternator
plan
is
that
alternator
plan
the
one
which
says
697
affordable
units
or
is
it
something
different
because
I
want
to
walk
away
happy,
and
hopefully
the
answer
is
yes.
AO
Y
Thank
you
very
much
and,
and
that
says
that,
if
anything
changes
we
will
be
seeing
those
changes
unless
they're
minor,
so
I'm
happy
with
that
I
think
yes,
please.
You
have
answered
my
questions
and
satisfied
the
ambiguity
which
I
had
after
reading
the
plan,
so
good
job
and
a
good
project
proceed
forward.
B
X
B
V
C
J
B
E
Apostle
from
the
Horseshoe
I
liked
what
I
heard
from
from
vice
mayor
commit
that
was
excellent.
That's
the
kind
of
policy
that
we
need.
We
can't
be
beholden
to
developers
and
and
kowtow
to
them.
You
don't
want
to
do
business
here
on
our
terms,
buy
go
somewhere
else,
go
somewhere
else.
We
This
Is
Our
Land,
and
we
vote
in
our
our
representatives
to
ensure
that
they
are
going
to
protect
our
interest.
E
There
was
direct
questions
slated
to
to
to
Chris
Burton,
and
he
didn't
answer
the
question
now,
when
I'm
sitting,
when
I'm
sitting
here
at
these
meetings
and
I'm
listening
I'm
paying
attention
to
the
questions
that
are
being
posed
by
the
by
the
council
members.
Now,
when
staff
doesn't
answer
the
question
and
they
just
kind
of
dance
around
it,
that
tells
me
everything
I
need
to
know
you're
lying.
You
don't
want
to
answer
the
question
because
you
understood
it.
I
could
tell
that
you
understood
it
because
you
intentionally
lied
about
it.
E
You
circumvented
the
whole
the
whole
the
entire
line
of
question,
because
you
knew
where
she
was
going
with
it.
So
stop
it.
Okay,
don't
do
that?
Don't
do
that
anymore!
It
makes
you
look
bad.
E
So,
in
conclusion,
I
really
am
encouraged
by
the
direction
that
the
counselor
has
been
going.
Lately.
I
really
am
Gabriel.
G
AP
And
I
am
proud
to
serve
as
a
government,
Affairs
and
policy
associate
for
Toronto
Wireless,
a
Next
Generation
fixed
wireless
access
company
founded
right
here
in
the
Bay
Area,
with
nearly
300
local
employees.
Last
year
we
raised
over
a
quarter
of
a
million
dollars
for
the
Valley
Medical
Foundation
at
our
inaugural
stars,
and
strides
Community
run
to
support
and
celebrate
our
Frontline
Hospital
workers
and
recognition
of
their
selfless
service
throughout
the
covid-19
crisis.
AP
This
year
we
ask
you
to
join
us
on
Saturday
July
1st
for
our
third
annual
stars
and
strides
Community
run
to
raise
330
thousand
dollars
for
the
Valley
Medical
Center
Foundation,
with
2
500,
paying
participants
and
400
volunteers.
Tonight
I
have
three
requests.
First,
please
register
yourself
and
your
family
at
stars
and
stridesrun.com
for
our
elected
leaders.
Please
sign
up
under
the
Cal
Water
elected
official,
slash,
executive,
5K
challenge.
AP
Second,
please
reach
out
to
your
own
community
members.
We
have
sample
texts
that
you
can
consider
to
make
this
easy
and
third,
we
would
be
honored
to
work
with
your
professional
staff
to
be
included
in
any
online
community
Communications
between
now
and
race
day.
We
have
an
opportunity
to
gather
to
celebrate
and
support
our
Frontline
healthcare
workers.
Please
join
us
in
Discovery
Meadow
on
July
1st
and
spread
the
word
throughout
your
communities.
Thank
you
very
much.
AF
Good
evening,
I
want
to
know
why
yesterday
a
whole
bunch
of
Realtors
came
up
and
made
personal
attacks
and
complaints
about
things
that
do
not,
you
know,
were
outside
gossip.
Basically,
if
anybody
I
know
had
tried
to
make
comments
like
that,
we
would
have
been
dragged
out
by
sjpd.
AN
Hello
good
evening,
mayor
council,
thank
you
for
this
meeting.
I
know
you
guys
been
working
a
lot.
Thank
you
for
all
the
learning
that
I'm
doing
from
all
the
speakers
and
all
the
questions
I
really
was
impressed
about
vice
mayor.
Please
to
me
as
an
organizer
that
sounds
like
a
campaign
conditioning
of
approval
of
affordable
housing
and
memorize.
AN
That's
that's
something
that
that
should
be
you
made
my
day
vice
mayor
I
can
tell
you
that
much
you
made
my
day,
I
think
we're
finishing
a
good
talk
and
thank
you
for
your
hard
work
and
yes,
let's
keep
fighting
for
the
community.
We
need
we
need.
We
need
solutions
that
they
really
work,
also
their
own
house
community
members.
They
serve
a
little
better
I,
don't
know
if
I
said
it
before,
but
I
want
to
say
it
again.
AN
It's
been
a
lot
of
talks
about
homelessness
in
that
world.
Please
we
can
use
a
house,
it's
a
little
bit
more
compassion,
a
little
bit
more
dignified
and
and
and
and
believe
me.
If
we
can
just
change
the
little
things
in
our
in
our
city,
it
will
be
a
better
City
where
we
all
can
live
and
drive
and
and
and
and
and
be
together.
You
know
and
yeah.
So
thank
you
have
a
good
night.
AQ
So
yeah
this
is
Cheryl
and
I.
Just
I
really
want
to
thank
our
mayor
and
all
of
our
council
members
today.
I
know
it's
been
a
lot
of
work
yesterday
and
today
and
I
want
to
thank
you
all
for
working
together
and
I.
Just
hope
you
all
keep
communicating
more
I
mean
we
have
such
a
huge
City
and
so
many
issues
and
obviously
money
is
always
going
to
be
a
problem
right.
AQ
AB
Good
evening,
I
was
just
just
gonna
say
that
I
agree
with
a
lot
of
the
people
that
spoke
before
me.
I
really
love
the
questions
that
vice
mayor
was
asking,
because
it's
exactly
what
I
was
thinking
and
it
was
kind
of
challenging
to
truly
think
Tony.
AB
Sorry
I
didn't
know
that
I'm,
sorry,
okay,
then
I
guess
I
just
want
to
thank
everyone
for
everything
that
has
been
done
so
far
and
but
yeah
I
was
also
kind
of
like
it
was
kind
of
frustrating
to
see
like
all
the
Realtors.
You
know
just
going
one
after
the.
AB
AR
Yeah,
this
is
Joshua
with
Little
Italy
San
Jose
I
just
want
to
thank
you
all
for
collaborating
I
know.
It's
been
a
long
meeting.
I
can't
imagine
you
guys
stick
through
it,
but
I
appreciate
the
collaboration.
You
all
have
and
appreciate
the
support
for
Little
Italy
and
just
wanted
to
congratulate
you
for
a
successful
budget
and
appreciate
your
support.
Thank
you.