►
Description
City of San José, California
December 8, 2021, City Council - Continuation of Dec. 7 Meeting
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be held at San José City Hall and also accessible via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=890221&GUID=5D3264F7-FFBC-4DA2-86D6-A323254860E3
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
A
B
A
B
B
So
are
you
able
to
see
on
zoom
how
many
folks
looks
like
we
have
a
quorum?
Okay,
great!
We
have
five
council
members
on
zoom,
so
why
don't
we
proceed
with
roll
call?
Thank
you.
Chris.
A
C
Here
and
rolls
here,
paralysis
here.
B
Okay,
so
thank
you
everyone,
I
I
wanted
to
start
where
we
left
off
and
ask
at
the
clerk's
office.
I
know
it
was
very
late
last
night,
but
I
assume
that
there
is
a
document
somewhere
that
describes
a
through
g
is.
Is
that
something
can
be
put
online
or
put
up
on
the.
A
We
took
notes
and
somebody's
compiling.
I
think
the
list
at
the
moment
so
we're
putting
it
together
right
now.
B
A
D
F
It's
the
map
is
map
was
prepared,
the
atlas
and
the
html
link
was
sent
last
night
around
12
45..
I
believe
it.
I
don't
know
if
it's
made
the
website
but
I'll.
It's
also
I'm
ready
with
the
map
that,
where
we
left
off
last
night,
which
includes
all
the
changes
that
were
discussed
by
the
council
members,
except
for
the
move
of
warner
heights
and
calico
creek
into
district
8
from
district
5.
B
All
right,
so
I
think
it
would
be
important
for
us
to
be
able
to
understand
each
of
the
individual
components,
because
those
will
be
discussed.
When
can
we
have
that
visible
for
the
public
and
the
council
to
be
able
to
see
not
not
every
single
element,
simply
the
broad
strokes,
which
would
be
a
council
member
foley
changes
to
district
9
right,
just
just
very,
very
broad,
strokes.
A
B
B
B
Oh
on
the
agenda,
okay,
great,
thank
you
councilmember
and
thank
you
cheers
so
so
that's
the
the
130
agenda
from
yesterday.
B
B
B
B
B
Okay,
councilman
cross
goes
just
about
the
loading
and
all
that.
B
B
G
B
B
Were
withdrawn
justice,
if
that's
okay,
just
put
it
in
parentheses
withdrawn,
if
you
like,
okay,.
B
B
B
B
F
B
Okay,
so
this
is
what's
called
council
map
version.
One
just
wanna
confirm
everyone's
got
that
on
their
screen
and
is
able
to
get
to
it.
A
B
Thanks:
okay,
great
everybody
on
zoom
able
to
pull
it
all
up.
B
Okay,
I
wanted
to
propose-
and
I'm
going
to
council
member
carrasco
first,
but
I
want
to
propose
a
way
of
proceeding
here
and
that
is.
We
have
a
whole
set
of
changes
that
have
been
proposed.
B
B
Given
the
fact
and
chris
I'm
going
to
ask
you
in
just
a
moment
first
to
describe
the
map.
We
got
at
this
point
because
it
seems
as
though
we
have
what
is
at
least
a
legal
map
at
this
point.
So
presumably
we
could
vote
in
the
individual
changes
and
get
there.
I
don't
expect
all
these
changes
will
be
approved,
and
so
there
will
need
to
be
additional.
I'm
guessing
there
will
be
additional
proposals
after
we
conclude
our
voting
on
this
first
round.
B
Okay,
chris,
would
you
like
to
describe
the
map.
F
Sure
I
think
it'd
be
easier.
If
I
show
you
as
I'm
describing
so
last
night,
we
started
along
change,
making
changes
since
district
nine,
and
so
we
moved
the
border
to
basically
the
current
lines
of
along
houstead
and
then
up
to
curtner
and
then
over
like
and
up
to
harris
so
that
they
align
to
the
current
split.
F
F
Fashion
and
then
in
district
9
and
2
or
10
and
2
2.,
we
really
redrew
them
to
follow
the
current
lines,
at
least
the
this
border,
this
north-south
border
line,
so
that
they
align
more
to
the
current
lines.
One
thing
that
we
did,
though,
though,
do
is
we're
using
87
as
the
border
between
nine
and
ten,
so
part
of
navarez.
That's
currently,
a
9
is
now
in
10.
F
And
then
continuing
around,
I
think
we
made
changes
to
the
southern
portion
of
2
and
then
these
these,
these
lines
are
the
same
one.
One
change
we
did
make
in
between
seven
and
eight
is
we
moved
the
adorn
and
silver
creek
area
from
seven
into
eight
to
unified
with
dove
hill.
F
The
border
then
goes
up
king
and
then
there
was
discussion
about
the
airport
and
the
need
to
basically
split
the
census
block
so
that
the
residents
near
overfelt
high
are
in
district
8,
where,
with
the
airport
in
district,
7.
or
sorry
excuse
me,
district
5..
F
We
also
made
changes
where
district
7
picked
up
hill
view.
District
8
picked
up
ocala.
F
And
then
moving
into
district
five,
one
change
that
wasn't
that
was
proposed,
but
not
made
because
of
it
would
overpopulate
district
eight
by,
I
think
six
or
seven
percent
was
moving
warner
warner
heights,
which
would
cause
calico
creek
warner
heights,
and
then
this
all
of
this
portion
up
here
to
move
into
eight
because
of
the
overpopulation
issue,
then
moving
north.
F
We,
I
think
this
district.
We
basically
made
the
district
three
five
border,
the
the
101
and-
and
one
thing
we
did
in
for
three
coming
all
the
way
around
is
that
we
unified
hyde
park,
japan,
town
and
civic
center.
So
now
the
87,
the
at
101,
are
the
borders
of
along
between
districts,
six
and
three,
and
then
there
was
one
change.
F
Up
here
to
move,
I
think
his
shopping
center
into
district
3
from
district
4..
I
think
those
were
the
major
changes
in
the
the
cohen
map
that
were
discussed
last
night.
B
Okay
and
if
you
could
describe
the
population
variants
and
demographics
of
the
map,
we
have
so
we're
just
oriented
to
where
we're
at.
At
this
point.
F
So
the
total
deviation
is
9.55.
F
So
you're,
right
below
the
10
total
deviation
that
that
you're
they
are
allowed
under
current
law,
and
I
think,
if
you
look
on
the
atlas
pages,
you
can
see.
I
think
I'll,
just
point
out
the
the
areas
of
interest
that
I
did
last
last
night.
So
you've
got
the
two
asian
cvap
over
plus
50
plus
seats
in
district
four
and
district
eight
district
four's
agency
evap
is
58.2,
district
8
is
56.7,
and
then
you
have
the
three
latino
influence
districts.
District
3
is
at
36.3.
F
Those
are
kind
of
the
highlights
of
the
the
demographics,
but
if
anyone
I
can
also
go
through
additional
numbers.
If
the
council
would
like
me
to.
F
Right,
yeah,
yes,
district
one
has
an
asian
c-vap
of
33.9
district.
Five.
This
is
has
also
has
an
agency
of
up
of
38.3,
and
then
you
have
another
in
district
7
at
46.9
agents,
evap,
okay,.
B
B
All
right
so
I'll
try
to
avoid
asking
legal
questions,
because
I
know
that's
not
fair,
okay,
so
my
suggestion
was
that
we
would
move
in
sequence
and
do
we
have
madam
clerk?
Do
we
have
a
a
list.
B
I
I
do
have
I
I
think.
As
we
look
at
the
list,
I
we
didn't
formalize
a
request
to
council
member
uranus
at
the
very
end
of
the
session,
which
was
to
ask
chris
to
look
at
ways
to
ensure
that
residents
near
the
airport
could
stay
in
district
8
and
the
airport
would
stay
in
district
5..
Do
I
have
that
correct.
F
B
Okay,
so
I
know
that
there
have
been,
we
have
a
through
f
so
far
we
have
some
that
have
been
withdrawn.
Let's
just
continue
in
letters
sequence,
regardless
of
whether
that
withdrawn
or
not
so
the
next
letter
yeah
anyway.
I
don't
need
to
tell
people
what
the
alphabet
is
all
right,
because
I
actually
don't
even
know
what
they
started
so
right
now,
we've
got
essentially
six
proposals
that
have
been
considered.
H
H
So
it's
a
little
difficult
for
me
right
now,
to
be
quite
honest
with
you
and
it's
not
your
fault,
it's
just
me
trying
to
coordinate
all
the
screens,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that,
given
the
historic
nature
of
the
alum
rock
corridor,
which
is
the
oldest
street
in
the
city
of
san
jose,
leading
to
the
the
oldest
park
in
the
state
of
california,
that
we
make
sure
that
we
keep
it
in
district
five.
H
H
And
the
and
the
hill
view
airport
you
have
here
that
stays
in
d8,
it's
not
in
d8
it's
in
d5.
F
So
it
the
it
should
read
that
the
airports
in
d5
and
the
population.
H
H
F
Okay-
and
I
think
one
thing
about
the
album
moving
alum
rock
park
into
district
five-
is
that
that's.
F
F
But
talking
to
your
legal
counsel,
I
think
we
have
to
take
more
pop,
more
area
and
population
into
district
five
to
allow
for
the
alum
rock
park
to
be
included
in
district
5..
That's.
H
F
F
F
So
I
believe
alum
rock
is
park,
is,
is
here
this
area,
because
your
current
lines
are
like
this.
F
Yeah
you're
gonna
have
to
take
this
one.
So
let
me
see
what
the
change
in
population
is
between
the
two.
So
that's
a
population
change
of
1,
000
people,
but
district
4
currently
is
the
most
overpopulated,
so
it's
actually
making
district
5,
4
and
5
nearly
identical
in
population,
so
it
actually
helps.
H
I
I
can
you
tell
me
what
the
what
the
overall
population
would
be.
F
So
that
so,
this
would
move
a
thousand
people,
a
thousand
fifty
six
people
into
district
into
district
five
and
make
your
district.
Then
3.98
overpopulated,
with
a
total
population
of
105,
000,
607
and
then
district
4
would
come
down
to
a
3.84
over
deviation
and
its
total
pop
population
would
be
105
400
for
473
people.
B
H
I
I
I'm
sorry
mayor,
I'm
just
I'm
just
digesting
this.
I
Well,
first,
let
me
say
that
I
I
you
know
I
whether
alan
rock
park
itself
is
split
in
half
or
not
is
not
of
concern
to
me
I
mean,
I
think
you
know
it's
a
city-wide
resource
and
where
it
you
know,
half
of
it
in
district
four
half
industry
five
is
fine.
Obviously
the
legal
advice
was
that
we
can't
do
that
for
contiguity.
I
I
would
object
to
taking
noble
out
of
district
four,
I
mean
noble
neighborhood,
that's
you're,
dividing
the
noble
neighborhood
right
in
half
that
whole
block
is
noble
around
the
noble
elementary
school,
and
that's
this
you
know
as
very
essa
school
that
fits
in
with
the
rest
of
the
berryessa
schools
and
taking
that
neighborhood,
there's
also
a
neighborhood
east
of
that
up
in
the
hill
that
that's
part
of
this
map,
there's
also
the
the
neighborhood
the
little
boot
at
the
bottom.
I
That
also
is,
you
know,
has
things
in
common
with
district
four,
so
you
know
I
don't
wanna.
I
would
object
to
removing
those
neighborhoods.
I
also.
I
also
wanted
to
show
to
make
a
more
general
comment
that
one
of
the
things
that
I
had
been
thinking
as
drawing
drawing
maps
was
trying
to
keep
districts
that
are
underserved
at
lower
populations,
because
the
resources
per
resident
then
goes
to
the
resources
go
further.
I
You
know
when
you
have
fewer
residents,
and
this
would
make
district
5
the
largest
district
in
the
city,
and
I
don't
know
that
I
think
that
that's
appropriate.
Obviously
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
perfectly
keep
all
those
districts
small,
but
right
now,
just
generally
about
the
overall
map.
I
Nine
and
ten
are
on
the
small
are
the
smallest
and
some
of
the
districts
like
seven,
are
the
largest
on
and
five
on
this
new
map
we're
looking
at,
and
I
don't
necessarily
think
that
that's
the
appropriate
outcome,
if
we're
talking
about
where
our,
how
our
resources
should
be
spent
in
the
city.
So
anyway,
I
for
those
reasons.
I
object
to
the
moving
of
people
out
of
the
noble
area
into
district
five.
B
Okay,
so
kenzo
mcrosco.
Why
don't
we
do
this?
Why
don't
you
think
about
whether
or
not
you
want
to
propose
this
you've
heard
the
objection
for
now.
What
I'd
like
to
do
is
to
proceed
with
what
we've
already
considered
and
go
a
a
through
f
and
vote,
and
then
you
can
decide
whether
you
want
to
propose
this.
Is
that
okay.
H
Yeah,
if
I
could
just
ask
chris
one
more
question
chris,
so
is
this
a
new
law,
because
at
one
point
I
mean
someone
drew
the
park
into
two
districts
without
having
this
contiguous
or
whatever.
The
legal
term
is
continuous.
Continuous
type
of
you
know
set
up,
and
so
was
this
a
new
development
or
how
did?
How
did
we
get
around
it?
At
one
point.
F
I
I
would
I
would
want
to
defer
to
mark
on
on
this
on
that
question,
but
on
the
question
of
the
2011
draw,
but
one
of
the
things
under
the
fair
maps
act
is
that
all
districts
must
be
contiguous
and
I
think
the
interpretation
of
contiguity
may
have
changed
over
the
decade,
because
currently
the
linkage,
I
believe,
is
like
what
we
call
point
contiguity.
F
So
the
the
line-
and
it's
not
even
a
census
block.
It's
you
just
attach
you.
You
split
these
blocks
here
to
allow
for
sorry.
So
I
got.
I
guess
if
your
legal
counsel
was
okay.
Well,
I
don't
know
if
I
could
do
it
yeah
so
yeah,
so
it
basically.
I
could
do
this
to
get
around
the
the
noble
neighborhood
and
go.
F
I
guess
go
that
way,
which
would
be
a
point
contiguity
touching,
and
I
think
I
would
defer
to
mark
on
whether
that
slight
connection
is
enough
under
current
law.
Okay,.
B
Because
I'm
gonna
cut
this
off
at
this
point,
because
now
we're
really
talking
about
resources
and
not
neighborhoods.
It's
about
a
fight
over
parks
and
parking
lots
and
shopping
centers,
and
we
agreed
that
that
was
going
to
be
something
we
would
handle
as
a
secondary
matter
and
we've
got
to
focus
on
the
neighborhoods.
It
seems
to
me
so
I
I
would
like
to
table
this
and
come
back
to
it,
so
we
can
at
least
make
some
progress.
B
I
think,
on
the
primary
work
we've
got,
which
is
figure
out
where
what
districts
people
live
in
and
again,
I
would
suggest
that
we
move
forward
motions
based
on
what
has
been
proposed.
There
are
going
to
be
other
proposals
that
are
going
to
come
forward,
but
if
we
get
lost
in
a
whole
lot
of
other
proposals,
we're
never
actually
going
to
get
anywhere
closer
to
a
map.
B
G
B
E
And
mayor.
B
Yeah,
okay,
I
just
heard
a
second
I
heard
I
think
the
council
remember
reynolds
wanted
to
speak.
Is
that
right.
E
B
Sure
no
problem,
so
we
have
a
motion
now
a
through
f
except
for
c
I'm
going
to
go
in
the
order
of
names
that
they
show
up
on
my
screen
here
and
then
then,
on
the
online.
So
first
we've
got
counselor
mayhem
and
then
councilmember
cohen.
K
B
So
we
may
we'll
have
to
come
back
to
that.
If
this
motion
doesn't
prevail,
okay,
counselor
conan,
do
you
want
to
speak
on
this
motion.
I
Yeah
I
mean
my
comment
is
about
the
border.
This
is
the
border
of
c6
and
d9.
I
guess
my
my
question
is
on
the
current
alignment.
I
So
I
just
was
curious
as
to
why
we
would
keep
that
piece
south
of
curtner
in
d6
and
not
connect
it
with
d9.
Okay,.
B
B
All
right,
council
member
and
then
I
see
on
the
screen-
I
see
councilmember
carrasco.
First
did
you
want
to
speak
on
this
motion.
A
Yeah
I'll
just
respond
to
council
member
cohen,
so
the
there
has
been
strong,
strong
sentiment
from
the
willow
glenn
residents
that
they
want
that
border
to
stay
where
it
is
so
that
was
that
was
the
purpose
of
making
that
determination
and
we
are
within
the
the
plus
or
minus
that
we
need
to
be.
I
can't
remember
what
it's
called,
so
that
was
the
that
was
the
reasoning
for
that
and
I'd
like
to
keep
the
boundary
where
it
is.
B
B
E
E
The
airport
is
directly
in
my
district.
It
borders
on
my
district
and
and
based
on
the
studies
that
were
made
on
lead
in
the
population
that
surrounds
that
neighborhoods.
South
wind
of
that
neighborhood,
which
is
kitty
corner
in
in
a
neighborhood,
called
hidden
glen.
That's
the
second
highest
impacted
neighborhood,
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
once
that
that
my
district
continues
can
have
a
voice
in
the
development
of
that
land,
since
they've
been
living
right
next
door
to
this
airport.
E
E
And
so
I'm
hoping
that
what
we
could
do
is
maybe
split
the
the
the
airport
so
that
d8
residents
in
the
future
can
can
have
a
voice
in
the
development
of
the
airport
that
contaminated
them
and
their
children
and
their
grandparents
and
such.
E
At
the
very
end
was
that
there
was
a
a
a
technical
issue
for
the
census
tract
that
once
you
highlight
this
and
and
make
it
part
of
d5,
then
you
take
some
of
the
residents
from
from
the
welch
neighborhood
into
d5,
because
the
airport
is
on
on
d8
side
of
the
street,
and
so
that
was
the
issue
that
was
last
night
and
I
don't
know
other
than
just
making
a
verbal
correction
for
chris.
E
I
don't
know
that
he
can
actually
do
it
technically
on
on
the
on
the
map,
and
so
that
was
an
inaccurate
description
of
what
I
said
last
night,
that
hill
view
airport
stays
in
d5.
E
What
that
really
should
read
is
that
there
should
be
a
fix
on
the
census
track
that
is
connected
to
the
hill
view
airport,
and
then,
aside
from
that
it
I'm
also
asking
for
that.
The
census
track
on
the
airport
to
be
split
between
d8
and
d5.
G
B
B
So
we'll
put
the
map
and
and
our
apologies
to
grace
and
the
clerks
team-
we're
we're
going
to
be
going
back
and
forth
between
these
two,
and
I
know
it's
always
going
to
be
the
wrong
screen,
but
please
be
patient
with
us
as
we
go
back
and
forth,
so
we're
going
to
pull
up
the
map,
so
everyone
could
look.
B
F
Yeah,
yes,
so
I
need
to
split
the
census
block
yeah,
so
we
can
do
that.
I
can't
do
that
like
in
a
live
draw
yeah,
that's
the
body,
we'll
note
it
and
make
sure
that
it
gets
integrated
into
the
final
plan.
A
F
So
I
believe
the
airport
is
in
right
here
in
this
white
space
without
any
streets
in
it,
and
so
the
motion
would
be
to
use
this
line
here
to
incorporate
these
residential
streets,
including
this
portion
here
into
district
8..
So
basically,
you
would
split
the
block
along
this
line,
so
that
will
include
all
of
the
airport
in
district
eight
and
actually,
I
think
it
might.
F
F
That
correct
yes,
so
I
think
understood.
Sorry,
I'm
sorry!
So,
basically
what
would
happen
is
this
line
here?
We'd
use
to
split
the
block.
All
two
blocks
all
the
way
south
to
tully
road,
so
that
this
southwestern
portion
that
has
population
in
a
neighborhood
would
be
in
district
8
and
this
white
portion
here
from
this.
This
new
line,
we're
creating
down
to
totally
over
to
capital,
expressway
and
back
up,
would
be
in
district
five.
B
F
F
So
we're
talking
about
1200
people,
so
let's
say
we
move,
we
move
a
thousand,
I
don't
know
if
we
move
it
over
district
five
would
go
down
to
2.45
over
and
I
think
district
8
would
go
up
to
sorry.
B
All
right
so
you're
talking
about
maybe
15
basis
points,
maybe
yeah
yeah,
yeah,
okay,
so
so
so
that
appears
to
be
acceptable.
So
counselor
davis
is
that
friendly
amendment.
A
So,
that's
not
that's
not
what
I
heard
council
member
arenas
say.
I
heard
council
member
arena
say
that
she
thought
the
airport
itself
should
be
split
between
d5
and
d8,
so
that
both
council
members
had
to
be
basically
both
council
members
had
to
be
consulted
about
what
happens
with
the
airport.
Did
I
get
that
correct
council
member
rayness.
E
Yeah,
that's
correct.
I
I
I'm
hoping
that
that
the
portion
that
chris,
that
you're
saying,
which
is
just
this
little
this
this
wedge,
that
is
against
the
the
the
back
of
this
neighborhood
of
overfelt
high,
if
that
is
that,
would
be
included
into
the
airport
correct.
A
The
only
reason
I
was
asking
is
because
that
area-
that's
not
called
welch
park
but
is
still
in
the
pink
here,
has
has
population
in
it,
and
I
was
not
sure
whether
council
member
uranus
was
saying
that
she
was
proposing
that
to
be
in
d5
or
d8.
E
Yes,
it
right.
Well,
it's
it's
always
been
part
of
yeah
and
it's
just
some
technical
issue
that,
when
that
specific
area
is
clicked
on
that
it
takes
the
d8
president,
so
I
was
trying
to
fix
that,
which
is
that
that
was
the
part
that
I
was
talking
about
last
night,
but
I
know
that
the
mayor
has
indicated
we
should
have
in
terms
of
resources.
E
We
should
have
a
separate
discussion,
so
as
long
as
that
is
fixed,
I'm
I'm
fine
to
move
forward
and
and
just
make
sure
that
those
residents,
don't
you
know,
slip
over
to
d5,
which
just
really
doesn't
make
sense.
Okay,.
A
I
G
So
we
can
just
because
of
what
everybody
just
figured
out
right
now.
We
can
just
go
ahead
and
include
the
airport
into
d5
just
right
now,
because
there
are
neighborhoods
attached
to
it,
unlike
valley,
fair
and
other
things
that
we're
going
to
discuss.
G
B
G
B
We'll
have
lots
of
time
to
get
clarity
on
those
issues.
I
I
guarantee
you.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
can
get
to
the
population,
which
is
the
hard
part.
Okay,
so
we're
gonna
go
next
to
council.
Member
jimenez
can.
B
Secondary
councilmember
mayhem.
Yes,
that's
fine
with
me.
Thank
you
for
clarifying
catherine,
all
right,
counselor
james.
J
Yeah,
thank
you
if
we
can
put
up
the
the
the
list
of
items
and
obviously
I'm
going
to
be
speaking
towards
about
the
discussion
we
had
briefly
yesterday
between
council
member
main
hand
and
I
on
the
boundaries
you
know.
One
of
the
things
that's
striking
to
me
is
as
we
go
through
and
have
these
conversations
in
these
different
districts
is
that
it
seems
to
me
that
we're
mainly
talking
about
deviation
and
things
of
that
nature.
J
But
one
of
the
things
that
concerns
me
is
just
the
impact
on
whether
keeping
retaining
the
lines
that
exist
or
modifying
them,
and
the
impact
on
voters
of
color,
latinos,
asians,
blacks,
and
so
I'm,
I'm
really
unclear
as
to
how
retaining
the
lines
or
or
what
we
did
in
district
2
in
district
10,
really
how
how
that
impacts
that
and
so
in
having
this
long
period
of
time
to
digest
sort
of
what
we
talked
about
yesterday.
I
I
think
I
am
not
going
to
be
supportive
of
the
changes
that
we
agreed
to.
J
I
also
do
think
that
in
thinking
about
it
a
little
further
that
the
the
santa
teresa
foothills,
I
think,
are
more
consistent
and
similar
to
district
10,
as
opposed
to
the
northern
part
that
we
we
talked
about,
which
I
think
borders
87
and
capital
expressway.
I
think
it
is,
and
so
I'm
not
going
to
be
supportive
of
that.
J
So
I'm
not
going
to
be
voting
for
the
motion,
but
I
just
wanted
to
express
that
that,
as
as
I
take
more
time
to
digest
this,
I
I
think
that
I
really
need
to
rethink
it,
and
so
I'd
be
supportive
of
moving
forward
with
the
area
of
district
2
in
district
10
as
it
was
proposed
in
the
cohen
map.
So
I'm
not
going
to
be
supporting
the
motion.
Thank
you.
B
Okay,
I
I
am
inclined
to
support
this
because
I
think
I
know
that
there's
been
a
lot
of
changes
here,
but
as
I've
been
tracking
it,
I
think
it
continues
to
comply
with.
Will
I
understand
to
be
the
legal
requirements
of
the
law,
so
I'm
I'm
likely
to
support
council
member
foley.
A
Thank
you.
I
I'd
actually
like
to
hear
from
council
member
jimenez,
if
I
could,
as
to
your
concerns
with
the
the
current
map,
you
you
said
in
general,
but
is
there
something
specific
as
far
as
a
change,
I
I'm
I
mean
as
far
as
my
map
is
concerned,
I'm
I'm
fine,
except
that
I
am
d9,
is
lower
representation
than
than
many
of
the
other
districts
d9
and
d10.
A
I
don't
know
how
to
grow
d9
without
affecting
d10
without
affecting
d7
or
d6.
So
I'm
I'm
open
to
suggestions
on
how
to
increase
population,
but
I'm
not
sure
where
to
where
that
would
come
from
so
other
than
that.
I
I
I
think
I'm
inclined
to
go
ahead
with
the
motion,
but
I
would
like
to
hear
from
you
council,
member
jimenez,
because
your
your
opinion
is
important.
Okay,.
J
A
No
I'm
actually,
no,
I
would
accept
my
map
as
it
is.
Although
I
do
have,
I
am
underrepresented
in
the
overall
scope
of
our
population.
I'm.
J
J
Well,
I
would
say
the
first
thing
is
that
it's
sort
of
rooted
in
you
know
these
changes
are
coming
out
very
quickly,
as
I
think
we
could
all
agree
on,
and
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
to
sort
of
digest
this
in
a
deeper
way.
I
will
be
doing
so
by
tuesday.
Obviously-
and
I
know
this-
isn't
the
final
vote
on
things,
but
I
would
hate
I'm
not
interested
in
supporting
something
that
I'm
completely
unsure
about.
J
I
guess
is
my
point
and
so
the
map,
as
it
was
drawn
in
the
cohen
map,
which
I
was
supportive
of-
and
I
seconded
that
substitute
motion
that
extended
the
district
10
southern
part
up
against
the
foothills.
J
J
Is
the
district
10
council
member
and
the
district
2
council
member
both
go
to
those
meetings,
and
so
it
seems
very
natural
to
me
that-
and
I
stated
this
yesterday,
that
it
would
you
know
I
have
no
issue
with
that,
and
and
so
thinking
about
that
as
it
relates
to
in
in
comparison
to
the
northern
part
of
district
10,
which
I
think
aligns
more
with
the
population,
the
type
of
folks
that
we
have
in
district
2
along
some
of
the
main
corridors
such
as
blossom
hill,
such
as
monterey,
road
such
as
101
such
as
85.
J
Well,
maybe
not
85,
because
we're
going
to
be
taking
that
out.
But
I
just
think
there's
more
similarity
in
the
type
of
folks
that
are
up
there
in
the
northern
part
and
that's
why
I
think
that
reverting
back
to
the
cohen
map
would
be.
It
seems
to
me,
based
on
what
I've
heard
already
and
my
opinion
may
change
by
tuesday,
but
it
seems
to
me
to
to
be
a
more
appropriate
and-
and
I
do
appreciate
councilman
mayhem's
comments
yesterday
about
already
working
on
some
projects,
such
as
stop
signs
and
things
of
that
nature.
J
With
with
the
folks
in
the
northern
part
of
district
10,
which
would,
via
the
cohen
map,
become
district
2.,
you
know
I
have
confidence
in
my
staff
that
we
can
carry
forward
any
of
those
things
that
are
being
done
there,
and
you
know
I
just
think
it's
likely
a
better
fit
and
again
I
need
to
analyze
the
numbers
a
little
bit
more,
but
it's
been
expressed
to
me
via
some
messages
that
I've
gotten
via
email,
that
keeping
the
lines,
as
is
what's
in
front
of
us
at
the
current
moment,
dilute
some
of
the
latino
votes
and
and
some
of
the
sort
of
the
black
votes
and
things
of
that
nature,
so
that
that
is
of
concern
to
me
and
I'm
going
to
dig
into
that
a
little
deeper.
J
A
No,
I
was
just
I
was
thank
you.
I
was
just
going
to
say
that
I
I
appreciate
that
input.
Councilmember
jimenez,
you
know
it
is
hard
to
know
what
we
did
last
night
and
see
how
that
plays
out
today.
It
was
a
long
night
and
it
was
an
early
morning
so
living
with
the
maps
for
a
little
bit
is
helpful.
So
I
I
just
appreciate
your
your
perspective
and
mayor.
A
Thank
you
for
allowing
us
to
go
back
and
forth
a
little
bit
on
that
discussion,
other
than
that
I'd
still
like
to
advocate
for
my
mobile
home
parks
on
narvaez,
which
is,
but
I
don't
want
it
to
impact
negatively
d10,
because
it
does
it's
760
residents
in
those
two
mobile
home
parks,
they're
senior
mobile
home
parks,
so
it
it's
and
typically
low
income.
A
So
that
adds
to
my
demographics
a
little
bit,
but
I'm
I'm
okay,
not
including
it,
because
I
don't
want
to
break
up
d10
any
anymore,
because
d10
and
d9
both
are
among
the
lowest
population
of
the
of
the
districts.
B
K
I
just
wanted
to
briefly
chime
in
on
the
the
north
south
east
west
divide.
I
personally,
and
I
think
it
is-
we
do
need
to
look
at
population
deviation
and
the
demographics.
I
I
don't
disagree
with
that
at
all.
I
just,
I
think,
there's
a
reason
that
the
commission's
map
that
passed,
I
think
11
to
1,
preserved
that
existing
north-south
orientation-
and
I
mentioned
last
night
school
district
boundaries
and
transportation
lines
were
working
with
multiple
neighborhoods
along
the
vta
light
rail
line.
K
I
I
I
get
that
you
could
certainly
argue
you
could
argue
the
the
snell
road
north
south
or
the
85
east
west.
I
understood,
but
I
have
not
heard
a
specific
or
compelling
reason
to
suddenly
swap
000
residents
between
d10
and
d2,
whereas
I
think
there
are
compelling
reasons
based
on
what
I
know
of
the
community.
In
fact,
I
I
don't
live
in
the
southern
half
of
district
10..
K
I
actually
live
in
the
northern
half
of
district
10.,
and
I
know
that
community
and
I
know
people
shop
at
the
oak
ridge,
mall
down
in
d10
and
the
blossom
hill
road
corridor.
They,
the
the
light
rail
line,
runs
north
south
monterey.
Road
runs
north
south,
as
does
snell.
Snell
is
a
major
natural
dividing
line.
K
Those
neighborhoods
are
clustered
around
marshall
caudle,
which
now
has
a
couple
of
connection
points
under
85
and
those
neighborhoods
work
together
on
issues
relating
there.
So
I
think
there
are
plenty
of
reasons
to
keep
the
lines
where
we
have
them,
as
the
commission
map
did
and
if
there's
a
specific
community
of
interest
that
we
think
is
on
the
wrong
side
of
the
district
boundary,
I'm
very
open
to
having
that
conversation
and
understanding
whose
needs
aren't
being
met
or
what
needs
to
shift.
K
But
I
just
I'm
I'm
kind
of
balking
at
the
idea
of
of
completely
swapping
these
two
big
sections
of
our
district.
Without
a
compelling
reason,
and
again
I
think,
there's
there
is
a
reason
that
the
commission
map
left
it
as
is
overwhelmingly
so
I
would
not
support
reverting
back.
I
I
like
the
map
and
would
support
the
current
motion
on
the
floor.
B
Okay,
maybe
if
I
could
just
offer
chris,
I
I
don't
expect
you
to
work
all
these
numbers
in
real
time,
but
at
least
the
concern
has
been
raised
about
racial
dilution
and
if
the
two
alternatives
around
d2
and
d10
could
be
compared
and
offered
to
us
and
be
able
to
have
a
clear
discussion
of
that
by
next
week.
I
think
that
would
be
helpful
just
to
have
transparency
to
make
sure
we're
not
doing
anything
that
would
not
comport
with
the
law.
J
And
mayor,
when
you
talk
about
the
two
alternatives,
sorry,
this
is
sergio
but
you're
talking
about
the
cohen
map
and
what's
currently
on
the
table.
J
Yeah,
that's
fine
with
me.
I
mean
I,
I
I
feel
confident
that
once
that's
looked
at
in
more
detail,
I
think
a
good
case
can
be
made
as
to
why
to
to
go
with
the
cohen
map,
but
yeah.
That's
fine
with
me.
F
So
I
so
the
to
basically
compare
the
the
cohen
map,
as
originally
presented
to
the
this
version.
Whatever
version
one
of
the
council
map,
that's
decided
and
look
at
voter
dilution.
I
think
I
would
also,
of
course,
work
with
mark
on
this
and
and
his
with
it
through
his
guidance,
because
I
think,
of
course
he
is
your
legal
counsel,
yeah
yeah,
and
so
we
can
work.
I
can
work
on
the
demographics
and,
and
he
can
work
through
the
legal
aspects
of
it.
F
B
J
And
mayor,
can
I
can
I
can
I
just
one
one
thing
that
I
think
I
think
is
important,
and
what
I
would
like
to
see
is.
I
know
that,
in
closed
session,
we've
had
discussions
about
redistricting
and
specifically,
I
think
nora
brought
in
this
professor-
that
sort
of
educated,
us
and
and
sort
of
you
know,
made
some
clear
points
as
to
where
these
maps
are
and
how
he
views
them
and
such
is
it
possible
to
get
him
to
be
present
during
tuesday's
meeting.
So
that
way
we
can
ask
some
of
these
questions
as
well.
D
Councilmember
we
can
check
on
that.
He
was
retained
as
a
as
a
litigation
consultant,
and
so
let
let
us
find
out
his
availability
he's
not
always
readily
available.
A
D
Let
us
gauge
whether
or
not
that
makes
sense,
but
we
definitely
will
be
consulting
with
him
also
and
and
we'll
share
any
legal
information
that
we
receive
with
the
council
in
if
it's
relates
to
litigation,
risks
that'll
be
handled
one
way
and
if
it's
public
information
that
can
be
handled
another
way.
B
Okay,
so
we'll
we'll
certainly
get
all
the
data
back
next
week
and
have
a
clear
idea
of
the
impact.
I
need
to
say
why
I'm
willing
to
support
going
forward
as
we
are
until
we
know
more,
which
is,
I
think,
councilman
mayhem
has
articulated
very
strong
reasons
to
keep
communities
of
interest
drawn
along
school
district
lines
and
neighborhoods
have
been
traditionally
working
with
each
other
for
many
years
in
the
same
district
and
keeping
those
fines
essentially
intact.
B
My
understanding
is
what
is
of
concern
is
where
obviously,
race
is
a
primary
mode
of
motivation
in
decision
making,
which
I
I
really
don't
believe
is
the
case
here,
and
you
know
the
line
looks
like
a
straight
line
more
or
less
that
runs
north
south
here
to
me,
so
it
certainly
has
a
lot
of
intuitive
sense.
B
So
I
think
what
we
have
is
a
motion,
I'd
like
to
vote
at
this
time.
Unless
there's
any
questions
about
the
motion,
that's
on
the
floor
or
any
clarification.
B
So
a
lot
of
people
have
their
hands
up
from
before.
So
if
I
could
just
ask
everybody
put
your
hands
down
unless
you
want
to
ask
a
question
or
a
clarification
about
this
motion:
okay,
I'll
go
first
in
the
room
here,
council
member
sparza.
G
So
the
motion
includes
what
councilmember
jimenez
the
the
compromise
which
both
are
coming
back
correct.
J
Well,
I
well
I
I
I
wasn't
supportive
of
the
changes
I
think
in
here.
It
says
that
the
changes
that,
if,
in
effect,
that's
the
map
that
we're
moving
forward,
I
don't
support
that.
I
I
think,
before
that's
even
considered
I'd
like
to
see
some
of
this
information
and
really
dig
into
this
little
deeper.
So
I'd
appreciate
if
it's
just
left
out
quite
frankly,
and
I'm
not
sure
how
that
impacts
the
drawing
of
the
lines,
but.
B
Yeah,
I
guess
what
I
would
say
is
this:
typically,
we
have
a
commission
that
produces
a
single
map
that
a
council
then
can
approve
or
not.
We
don't
do
ourselves
any
favors
when
we
move
forward
with
multiple
maps.
Just
like
the
commission
didn't
do
us
any
favors
by
moving
forward
with
three
maps,
even
though
they
preferred
obviously
their
own.
B
I
think
it's
important
for
us
to
get
to
a
map
and
if
we
learn
that
there
are
issues
with
it
through
a
transparent
process
and
we
discuss
the
data,
then
I
think
we
pivot
and
change
direction,
but
I'm
not
willing
to
move
forward
with
two
maps.
I
think
we
need
to
move
forward
with
one
map
and
learn
what
we
learn
and
have
that
public
discussion
answer.
Sparza.
I
Yeah
you're
making
a
slightly
different
argument
than
I
than
I
think
I
would
make
about
two
separate
maps
and
having
to
pick
a
map,
I
mean,
I
think,
what
my
preference
would
be
to
bifurcate
this
question
and
leave
out
the
210
from
the
first
vote
and
approve
the
rest
of
the
changes
that
were
in
that
motion.
The
210
question
is
not
just
about
whether
or
not
there
are
issues
legally,
but
also,
potentially,
whether
there
are
arguments
to
be
made
for
communities
of
interest
in
different
definitions
of
community
interest
from
different
viewpoints.
I
There's
a
reason
why
I
had
left.
You
know
created
that
boundary
in
the
map
in
the
first
place
because
of
my
understanding
from
people
about
their
desires
for
some
things
to
change
in
terms
of
the
communities
of
interest
at
the
210
boundary.
I'm
not
you
know,
I'm
just
one
voice,
but
I'm
not
the
whole
council.
I
This
is
also
based
on
conversations
with
council
member
jimenez
and
he's
now
articulating
that
view,
which
is
a
different
view
about
what
communities
of
interest
belong
together.
And
you
know
both
views
are
valid
views,
but
my
thought
is
that
this
doesn't
really
affect
our
map
process
to
say,
let's
come
back
with
the
data,
look
at
the
numbers
next
week
and
pick
one
of
the
two
map
alignments
that
will
then
plug
into
the
remainder
of
the
map.
I
I
B
I
I
B
I
G
I
have
a
question
I'm
willing
to
second
that,
but
I
just
have
a
question
so
if,
if
we
so
we're,
essentially
defining
the
decision
on
e,
but
we
will
look
at
both
maps
at
the
next
council
meeting
correct,
so
the
con
the
consultant
will
registering
partners
will
do
the
work
on
both
maps
and
they
both
come
back
to
us
next
meeting.
Is
that
correct.
B
Okay,
so
there's
a
motion,
councilman
cohen,
second,
from
council
member
sparsa.
Now
I
want
to
tell
everybody
who's
on
the
zoom
screen.
I've
got
four
hands
up.
Do
all
four
people
want
to
speak
on
this
issue?
Okay,
council,
member
carrasco,.
H
Yes
mayor,
I
just
have
a
question
and
I
don't
know
if
this
is
going
to
be
a
friendly
amendment
or
not.
So
it's
going
to
start
off
as
a
question.
Please
be
patient
with
me
because
there's
a
you
made
a
comment,
councilmember
cohen,
which
I
wholeheartedly
agree.
When
you
look
at
those
districts
that
are
of
high
need-
and
of
course
we
know
where
they
kind
of
land
and
of
course
seven
and
five
are
are
amongst
the
the
most
challenged.
H
In
my
opinion,
every
district
has
its
own
challenges,
but
we
know
what
five
and
seven
face
on
the
daily,
and
so
so
I
it's
just
a
question
mayor.
H
Please
don't
don't
cut
me
off
so
I
had
asked
for
las
plumas
to
be
drawn
into
district
five
yesterday
because
it
made
sense
to
me
because
it
was
east
of
101,
but
that
was
with
the
understanding
or
with
the
hope
and
a
prayer
that
we
could
get
warner
heights
back
into
district
8
from
some
of
the
comments
that
I've
heard
from
some
of
the
neighbors
that
they
felt
that
they
they
were
more
aligned
with
the
communities
there.
H
But
since
that's
not
happening,
I'm
at
about
a
hundred
and
four
hundred
and
five
thousand,
which
for
a
community
of
high
needs
and
many
many
challenges
poses
a
great
deal
of
you
know
challenges
for
my
team.
So
I
don't
know
if
this
would
come
in
as
a
friendly
amendment
to
put
las
plumas
area
back
into
d3.
H
H
It's
not
little
portugal,
it's
las
plumas,
it's
it's
all
over
there
by
oscar.
H
In
that
part
of
is
called
gateway,
east.
B
F
So
this
would
would
greatly
equalize
these
these
two
districts
together
district
three,
would
go,
would
move
to
a
positive
deviation
of
0.42
and
district
5
would
move
to
a
negative
1.43,
so
district
3
would
have
around
102
000
people
and
district
5
would
just
have
over
100.
H
B
We're
gonna,
I
think
we
should
okay,
that's
part
of
d,
I'm.
B
B
And
we're
going
to
go
to
d3
councilman
peralta.
Do
you
have
any
concerns
about
that.
C
C
and
previously,
or
is
that
the
current
existing
map
that
we're
working
under
right-
I
don't
know
the
best
way
to
say
without
being
confusing,
but
the
map
we've
had
for
the
last
10
years.
Has
portugal
little
portugal
combined
all
into
district
3..
C
I
don't
necessarily
think
it's.
You
know
it's
the
the
biggest
issue
to
then
have
that
split
at
the
280,
because
it
is
a
natural
split
and-
and
there
already
is
a
natural
split
amongst
the
the
two
sides
of
280.
I
would
say
of
the
little
portugal
neighborhood,
but
I
think
that's
just
been
one
thing
that's
raised.
I
don't
know
what
that
would
do
to
the
to
the
to
the
population
as
well,
and
I'd
like
to
get
councilmember
classical's
feedback
on
that.
C
I'm
I'm
fine
with
this
proposed
changed
right
now,
but
I
I'm
I'm
sort
of
passing
it
back
that
there's
the
neighborhood
next
door
and
I
wanted
to
hear
your
feedback
on
that
counselor
yeah.
H
Yeah,
I
I
know
I
there's
there's
a
lot
of
comments
going
back
and
forth.
I
will
tell
you
that
it
is
not
what
it
was
ten
years
ago
and
if
you
just
drive
down
that
little
strip,
it's
it's
a
very
mixed
businesses.
It
doesn't
look
like
it
does
west
of
280.,
it's
very
different,
and
so
I
I
would
retain
gateway
east
or
or,
as
it
shows,
on
the
map.
Little
portugal.
B
C
About
this
change,
no
that
that's
fine
they're!
Not
can
you
leave
my
hand
up
wherever
I
was
we'll.
C
E
Thank
you
mayor,
so
I
I
have
a
another
ish.
E
I
have
an
issue
with
with
some
of
the
d6
changes
that
were
made
and
I
think
they're
deliberate
deliberately
moving
latino
and
black
residents
who
are
currently
in
d6,
and
I
don't
know
if
that
maybe
was
inadvertently
happening,
and
I
I
don't
want
to
see
the
a
reduction
in
political
power
or
separation
from
other
latino
and
black
and
brown
communities,
and
that's
the
canoas
gardens
and
farmer,
ruby
rubino
in
particular,
and
so
to
me-
and
you
know
this
is
for
the
legal
experts.
E
But
this
seems
a
bit
of
a
cracking
of
that
community.
And
so
I
wonder
if
we
could
also
cha
move
this
question
over
in
terms
of
this
d6
boundary
with
the
d2d10
side
of
of
things.
E
Well,
yes,
I'm
proposing
an
amendment
councilmember
cohen.
Would
you
be
amenable
to
also
including
I
know
that
you
had
also
some.
There
were
also
some
concerns,
including
yourself,
because
in
your
original
map,
this
is
not
what
the
boundary
looked
like.
I
think
in
your
original
map,
this
it
was.
It
was
something
that
I
could
live
with,
and
so
I'm
hoping
that
you
can
include
some
of
the
these
issues
about
the
d6
boundary
into
that
question,
about
the
dude,
the
d2
d10
boundaries
as
well.
B
Is
that
you
mean
look
having
look
at
the
racial
demographics
right?
The
changes
is
that
right,
right,
okay,
so
you're,
looking
for
an
analysis
of
the
racial
demographics
of
this
change,
are
you
proposing
any
change
in
the
boundary.
E
No,
I'm
not
proposing
any
change
in
the
boundary
for
now.
I
think
that
we,
this
is
my
impression
of
what
that
looks
like
that.
I
know
that
those
you
know
this
is
from
what
I
know,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
not
just
what
I
think
I
know,
but
that
is
actually
an
analysis.
F
Just
one
note,
so
the
this
green
line
here
is
the
original
cohen
map.
It's
split,
canoes
garden
and
farm
and
rubio
kind
of
maybe
60
40
between
district
6
and
district
9.
B
Okay,
councilmember
cohen
you,
okay
with
that
friendly
amendment,
yeah.
I
F
E
B
B
I
B
Okay,
great
councilmember,
perales.
C
Yeah,
thank
you
along
some
of
the
lines
I
think
of
the
conversations
we're
having
right
now
and
and
councilmember
jimenez
sparked
it
for
me,
and
I
think
we've
been
sort
of
discussing
it
in
regards
to
dilution,
which
we
have
legal
requirements
right
to
to
to
follow,
and
I
think
where,
as
we're
looking
at
the
maps
we're
likely
following
all
those,
but
I
think
we
also
have
considerations
to
take-
and
we've
heard
that
as
well
and
it's
not
just
about,
I
would
say,
diluting
potential
minority
voices.
C
I
think
it's
about
enhancing
them
as
well
right
and
that's
the
other
side
of
of
the
dilution,
and
I
think
that's
the
other
side
of
what
I
heard
from
councilmember
jimenez
was.
Is
there
a
map
that
is
also
legal,
but
might
it
enhance
some
of
the
the
traditionally
underheard
voices
and
underrepresented
voices?
C
And
so
that's
where
you
know?
I
think
I
don't
want
to
land
just
because
something
is
legal,
but
it
may
not
be
what's
better,
and
so,
if
we
can
find
something
else,
that
is
also
legal
and
keeps
communities
of
concern
together.
You
know
uses
some
natural
boundaries.
I
I
appreciated
that
the
sort
of
the
the
the
north-south
version
of
cohen's
map
was
also
using
natural
boundaries
of
the
freeway
there,
similar
to
the
discussion
I
just
had
with
councilmember
carrasco.
I
understand
that
that
you
know
using
that
natural
bounty
of
the
280.
C
You
know
between
a
neighborhood,
that's
already
split
and
you
know
maybe
there's
an
interest
to
try
to
keep
together,
but
maybe
there's
also
an
interest
not
to,
and
neither
one
may
be
illegal,
but
there
there
is
is
maybe
a
benefit
from
one
over
the
other,
and
so
that's
where
I
think
I
I
am
more
interested,
and
I
appreciate
where
the
motion
is
going
now,
because
I
think
it
gives
us
an
opportunity
to
take
a
look
at
that
before
we
simply
just
land
on
a
map
and
and
I'm
not
accusing
anybody
of
right
of
of
of
any
you
know,
I
think,
miss
doing
it's.
C
It's
a
matter
of.
Let's
actually
look
at
some
of
this
data
and
if
there's
a
way
to
enhance
some
traditionally
underrepresented,
minority
voices
and
it's
you
know
it's
completely
legal
and
doable
and
it's
a
way
that
keeps
populations
together.
You
know
I
I
I
in
my
mind,
that's
where
I
would
like
to
land,
and
I
think
we
may
have
an
opportunity
to
do
that
with
just
some
some
a
few
changes
as
it
sounds
like
now.
C
So
I
think,
with
the
the
current
motion
and
the
two
amendments
I
I
can
can
support
that
direction
going
forward
and
then
I'll
raise
my
hand
later,
because
council,
member
spars
and
I
have
a
a
non-uh
population
line
that
we'd
like
to
discuss
between
our
districts.
Thanks.
B
Okay,
council,
member
foley,
I
believe
your
hand
up-
was
that
from
before.
B
All
right,
we
have
a
substitute
motion
from
council
member
cohen,
which
is
to
incorporate
all
these
changes,
except
for
e
from
council
member
mayhand,
and
that
will
look
at
the
two
options
next
week.
Is
that
correct?
B
Okay-
and
I
know
it's
been
amended
and
tweaked
a
little
bit
along
the
way,
but
that's
the
motion.
Let's
I'll
support
that
motion,
and
hopefully
we
can
get
closer
to
resolution.
Let's
vote.
C
H
D
A
B
I'm
sorry
what
was
the
vote?
Eight
eight
to
three
to
five?
Yes,
okay,
so
that
that
prevailed
by
vote.
Eighty-Three,
I'm
sorry!
I
wasn't
tracking
okay!
Now
we
can
consider
other
motions
with
regard
to
what
we've
just
discussed
or
we
can
start
to
talk
about
assets
and
resources
like
airports
and
shopping
centers.
So
I
guess
I
would
encourage
us
to
try
to
move
to
the
ladder.
So
we
can
get
those
issues
kind
of
knocked
out
and
then
we
can
come
back
on
tuesday,
councilman
peralta.
You
have
your
hand
up.
C
Yeah
mine
is
the
ladder
around
a
non-population
move,
so
I'm
I'm
happy
to
wait
if
yeah.
C
Okay,
so
this
is
about
san
jose
state's
south
campus
and
if
I'll
wait
until
maybe
we
can
get
the
map
up
to
oh,
oh
well,
I
guess,
if
you
want
to
take
notes,
go
for
it
or
look
at
the
map
either
way.
C
It's
a
it's
a
slightly
nuanced,
it's
kind
of
like
council
member
adenis
adenos's
discussion
around
the
airport,
because
I
think
you're
going
to
have
to
draw
in
a
a
line
if
you
will
so,
if
you
can
zoom
in
a
little
bit
north
of
that
yeah,
just
just
right,
a
little
lower
right
there
yeah
that
bottom
corner
the
bottom
right
corner
here.
C
Got
it
so
those
three
blocks
there
on
the
bottom.
A
C
C
F
B
Okay,
so
this
is
we'll
call
this
spartan
south
campus.
G
This
is
south
campus,
correct,
yep
and
and
grace
I
sent
you
a
photo
that
might
be
helpful
for
folks
to
see
it
after
this
too.
Thank
you
so.
C
That
little
appendage
actually
does
have
some
residents
and
I'd
like
to
keep
those
residents
and
it's
not
san
jose
state.
So
I
don't
know
why
the
map
kind
of
draws
it
that
way.
But
essentially,
if
you,
if
you
went
straight
across
that
same
line
that
yeah
that
one,
then
you
would
basically
only
incorporate
you
know
the
the
south
campus,
which
really
has
no
population,
and-
and
you
know,
and-
and
so
I
don't
know
if
you
can
do
that-
but
that
that
would
be
my
my
so.
F
It
would
interest
me
drawing
drawing
the
line
at
what's
this
street.
C
Yeah,
there's
there's
an
apartment
complex
up
at
the
top
corner.
There,
okay
yeah
got
it
and-
and
I
don't
know
if,
if
you
can
even
be
more
specific
and
creative,
my
guess
is
those
17
people
all
live
along
humble
and
when
you
inc,
they
probably
live
on
the
south
end
of
humble
I
don't
know
if
you
can
draw
them
out
and
keep
them
in
d3,
and
only
do
you
know
the
spartan
campus
that
would
resolve
100
of
the
the
residential
issues.
So.
F
B
Okay,
I
think
we're
clear
now
we're
going
to
call
this
j
perales
south
campus
councilman
response
is
that,
okay
with
you
yep,
it
is
okay.
So
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
get
these
out
on
the
floor
and
then
hopefully
we're
going
to
have
just
a
global
motion
and
sweep
all
these
changes
in
and.
G
Also,
I
grace
has
a
photo
that
might
help
them
draw
it
and
see
like
a
google
earth
photo
to
see.
We
just
don't
want
to
make
sure
the
residents
stay
whole
and
yeah
yeah
thanks.
B
Okay,
so
I
think
we're
all
clear
on
the
outcome.
Next,
I
just
like
to
go
to
the
hill
view
airport,
since
that
obviously
was
a
great
concern
and
ask
you,
the
council,
member
erranus
or
councilmember
crosscode,
to
tell
us
what
they'd
like
us
to
do
with
the
airport.
E
Sure,
since
I'm
the
one
who
brought
this
up,
I
know
that
there's
a
technical
change
that
we
needed
to
make
for
the
population
that's
connected
to
the
airport,
with
the
census
track.
But,
aside
from
that,
I
think
I've
already
expressed
my
desire
to
have
district
8
voices
heard
on
the
development
of
this
airport
they're,
the
ones
who
have
one.
E
That
is
also
impacted
the
greatest,
because
that's
where
the
wind
carries
the
lead
when
there's
takeoff
and
landings-
and
so
you
know
I
I
just
want
to
be
able
to
to
have.
E
Obviously,
it
won't
be
during
my
term
it'll
be
during
a
future
term,
but
I'm
looking
for
the
best
interest
of
these
welch
residents
to
have
a
voice
in
the
development
that
has
contaminated
their
lives
and
their
well-being
to
something
that
they
would
like
to
live
next
to,
and
so
whatever
that
looks
like,
if
it's
just
a
portion
of
it,
it
doesn't
have
to
go
half
whatever
portion,
that's
closest
to
district
8
along
the
border
of
where
the
populations
are.
If
we
could
establish
a
boundary,
then
that
would
be.
E
That
would
be
great
so
that
those
residents
can
also
have
a
voice.
B
H
Yeah
and-
and
I'm
perfectly
fine
with
that
mayor,
but
if
I
could
just
if
I
could
also
just
add
to
this
conversation-
the
the
study
that
council
member
arenas
we're
all
familiar
with
that
study.
I
hope
everybody
remembers
it
true.
There
were
some
areas
of
the
district
of
the
neighboring
districts
that
were
impacted
more
than
others.
H
But
of
course
my
district
is
all
the
way
around
that
area,
and
I
also
have
had
the
neighborhoods,
where
the
planes
have
actually
fallen
right
on
top
of
people's
homes,
and
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
those
neighborhoods
stay
safe
and
that's
why
I
I
strongly
hope
and
advocate
for
the
residents
of
district
five
at
the
end
of
the
day,
you
know
the
the
hope
is
that
district
five
in
district
eight
will
continue
to
work
together
and
be
cooperative.
H
We
don't
know
who
will
take
this
seat
in
the
next
12
months
or
who
will
take
d8
in
the
next
36
months
from
now,
but
it's
always
been
in
district
five
and-
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
voices
of
of
the
people
that
are
most
marginalized,
and
so
I
don't
want
to
get
into
the
politics
of
things
or
into
the
social
economics
of
the
district
as
a
whole
or
who's
been
in
this
office
or
that
office.
Or
what
have
you?
H
But
I
mean
I'm
okay,
if,
if,
if
dividing
the
the
airport
to
some
extent,
gives
district
8
peace
of
mind,
there's
a
lot
of
ways
of
being
able
to
contribute
to
the
conversation
into
the
development.
There's,
of
course,
the
vta
opportunities
and
there's
also
the
subcommittees
as
well.
But
I
think
that
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
opportunities
for
the
surrounding
council
members
d75d8
to
contribute
in
in
the
next
10
years
as
this,
this
plan
truly
develops
and
unfolds.
B
I
think
that
doesn't
change
anything
right.
The
airport
stays
in
district
five.
Then
we
don't
need
to
change
anything.
So,
let's
move
on
to
the
next
non-residential
resource,
so
any
other
shopping,
centers
parks,
airports.
Anything
else
that
folks
want
to
raise.
I'm
going
here
in
the
room.
First
council,
remember
cohen,.
I
There's
just
a
small
thing
that
toyan
elementary
school,
which
is
right
on
the
border
of
d4
and
d5,
is
currently
in
d4.
It's
just
drawn
around
the
school.
It's
the
only
of
the
13
variesa
schools
that
wouldn't
be
in
d54
on
this
map.
It's
right
along
penitentiary,
creek
road,
and
I
just
would
like
to
draw
a
line
around
toyon
school
to
keep
it
with
the
other
schools
and
berryessa
as
part
of
d4.
Okay,.
B
A
Thank
you
mayor
with
all
the
impactful
discussions
and
issues
that
we've
been
addressing
in
terms
of
the
boundaries
I'm
actually
kind.
E
A
So
that
being
said-
and
I
also
heard
from
councilmember
davis's
adamant
position
and
passion
about
retaining
valley
fear
in
district
6.,
I
like
to
take
that
off
the
table
and
I
look
forward
to
working
with
councilmember
davis
on
on
the
urban
village.
Again,
I
think
that
splitting
an
urban
village
like
that
is
probably
not
the
best
course
of
action,
but
I
know
that
the
council,
member
davis
and
I
can
can
really
move
this
this
process
forward
and
benefit
our
community.
So
I'm
going
to
withdraw
my
proposal
for
valley,
fair,
okay,.
B
Vice
mayor
jones
is
diplomatically
withdrawn
c,
so
right
now
the
motion
is
just
jay,
councilmember,
perales
and
kay
council
member
colin.
Are
there
other
non-residential
resources
that
we
should
discuss
before
having
a
motion,
and
I'm
seeing
grace
lean
in?
Did
you
want
to
tell
us
something.
B
No,
we
were
only,
I
think.
What
was
part
of
the
motion
was
only
the
residential
portions
yeah,
because
we
were
just
talking
about
where
people
go.
Okay,
I'm
not
seeing
anyone
raise
their
hand,
it's
their
last
chance
to
try
to
get
levi's
stadium
out
of
santa
clara,
for
example,.
B
Okay,
then,
let's
entertain
a
motion:
we
have
jay
perales
and
kate
cohen
on
the
table.
Anyone
like
a
move
of
approval.
I
B
All
right
motion
counselor
as
far
as
a
second
council
member
cohen,
let's
vote
on
that
motion.
B
A
A
Can
I
have
clarification
on
cohen's
change
to
the
map?
Please.
I
F
B
I'd
like
to
raise
one
more
concern
as
we're
thinking
about
analysis
that
comes
back
to
us
on
tuesday,
when
I
had
conversations
with
our
council
with
with
nora
a
week
or
two
ago
we
talked
about
what
legal
vulnerabilities
there
may
be.
B
We
have
not
been,
I
think,
legally
vulnerable
in
the
past,
but
there's
have
been
demographic
shifts
in
our
city
and
among
those
very
significant
demographic
shifts
is
that
we
are
a
much
higher
percentage
of
asian
american
community
than
we
have
been
in
the
past,
and
I
believe
the
number
is
somewhere
around
38
I
may
have
off
by
one
percent
or
so
chris
is
that
right.
B
As
I
understand
it,
chris
we
have
two
asian
american
majority
districts
that
is
district
4
in
district
8.
Is
that
right?
Yes,
and
then
we
have
several
what
we
call
districts
of
influence,
but
the
the
largest
of
those
is
district
7,
which
has
nearly
half
of
the
population,
is
asian
american.
I
think
you
just
said
it
was
48.
Is
that
right.
B
Six
point:
I.
F
Mean
in
in
the
in
the
council
version
one
map.
B
Okay
and
the
one
we
just
approved
correct
yeah,
so
my
concern
is
is
actually
higher
than
that
before
and
by
here's.
What
I
mean
by
that
you
move
from
where
the
commission
map
was
to
what
council
member
cohen
cohen's
map,
we
moved
dove
hill
out
of
district,
seven
dove
hill.
That
area,
I'm
just
getting
these
numbers
in
the
68
asian
american,
then
through
council
amendment
aborn,
was
moved
out
of
district
7.,
that's
61,
asian
american
and
we're
concerned
about
dilution.
Hill
view
was
moved
into
district.
B
I
can
tell
you
a
decade
ago
when
I
was
on
the
council
before
the
last
lines.
We
had
three
asian
american
representatives
on
the
council
and
I
think
there
is
a
concern
about
dilution
and
reduction
in
district
seven.
I
would
like
to
have
an
analysis
of
that
so
open
to
any
emotions
or
whatever
I'm
hoping
at
least
we
can
understand
those
numbers
council,
member
esparza,.
G
And
we
have
that
analysis
for
district.
What
6
district
9
and
ten
and
two
as
well
is
that
correct.
G
G
So
that's
why
it
made
sense
to
have
dove
hill
in
that
area
so
that
those
residents
could
they're
more.
The
families
at
the
school
are
now
in
other
parts
of
evergreen
now
and
and
so
we're
looking
at
communities
of
interest,
we're
specifically
tasked
with
looking
at
schools
and
how
they
work,
and
so,
if
included
in
that
analysis,
we
look
at
how
dove
hill
and
the
dispersal
of
dove
hill
students
when
that
school
was
closed
into
other
schools
into
the
evergreen
school
district.
G
Those
families
are
in
with
other
parts
of
evergreen,
so
it
makes
sense
again
it's
not
about
politics,
I
wand
of
hill,
it's
about
what's
doing
right
for
the
community
and
and
what
I'll
say
is
is
district
seven.
In
the
other
maps,
the
the
latino
population
was
higher
in
some
of
the
other
maps.
G
Yet
I
went
with
this
map,
and
so
so
things
have
been
moved
all
over,
but
what
this
map
does
is
it
maintains
a
higher
number
of
asian
voters
and
asian
influence
on
this
district.
We
are
not
diluting
that.
It
is
still
a
higher
voting
population
as
it
was
in
2018.
G
It
is
still
an
asian
influence
population
as
it
was
in
2018..
So
I'm
happy
to
include
that
analysis.
Okay,.
B
Is
there
a
second
okay?
I
appreciate
that
counselor
spars
and
again
I
think
it's
just
important
for
us
to
put
the
data
out
there.
As
in
all
these
cases,
there
may
be
very
good
arguments
around
communities
of
interest
and
other
justifications.
G
G
That's
specifically
a
part
of
this
redistricting
process
and
and
and
to
say
that
there
are,
you
know,
no
asians
now.
Well,
there
have
been
times
when
latinos
have
been
underrepresented
on
this
council.
It
happens,
the
voters
elect
who
they
elect.
D8
has
been
a
majority
asian
seat
and
and
ultimately
it's
the
voters
who
have
a
say
I'll,
stop
there.
Thank
you.
H
Yes,
thank
you
so
much
and
I
I'm
going
to
support
the
motion
on
the
floor
and
I
will
add
you
know
I
I
feel
I
feel
a
need
to
respond
to
a
couple
of
comments
that
you
made
mayor
with
all
due
respect.
When
we
talk
about
that,
there
is
no
representation
of
one
ethnic
group
or
the
other.
We
did
have
in
my
time
that
I've
been
here
over
the
last
six
years.
I'm
sorry,
seven
years
we've
had
three
different
asian
representatives.
H
I
imagine
that
you're
speaking
directly
to
our
council
colleagues
for
having
having
unseated
those
asian
representatives,
which
is
council,
member
cohen,
he
unseated
council,
member
lon
and
council
member
sparza,
who
unseated
council
member
tam
nguyen
so
there
there
is
those
asian
seats
and,
and
they
were
occupied
by
by
asian
representatives
and
and
council
member
lon
unseated
council
member
min,
and
so
so
I
think
it.
Those
are
unfair
assessments
that
have
been
made
and
it
stirs
up.
H
I
think
a
lot
of
divisiveness
along
racial
lines
here
in
the
city
of
san
jose,
when
we
should
be
truly
looking
to
unite
and
strengthen
our
voices
and
and
actually
look
to
see
where
we
can
continue
to
strengthen
the
voices
of
those
that
are
most
marginalized.
H
Population,
the
latino
population,
I've
not
ever
heard
one
person
speak
up,
neither
a
council
member,
my
mayor
or
the
audience
come
and
say:
why
is
there
only
one
latino
seat
in
the
city
of
san
jose?
I've
heard
a
lot
of
comments
and
a
lot
of
protests
and
a
lot
of
disgruntled
commentaries
regarding
the
suppression,
potentially
the
suppression
of
asian
voices.
I've
never
once
heard
anyone
being
disgruntled
regarding
the
suppression
of
a
latino
voice.
H
I've
heard
the
analysis
that
there's
latino
influence,
but
I've
not
seen
in
any
of
the
maps
other
than
for
district
five,
a
a
strong
latino
seat
that
could
potentially
represent
brown
people.
That
is
a
huge
concern
to
me
and
it's
a
huge
concern
that
that's
not
part
of
the
analysis
that's
being
put
forth.
H
We
don't
complain.
No
one
says
anything:
it
seems
to
be
okay,
that
we're
following
the
status
quo
with
four
or
five
even
potentially
caucasian
seats,
and
that
seems
to
be
a-okay
with
everybody.
H
There's
no
analysis
on
that.
So
I
I
don't
know
if
we
can
do
a
further
analysis
if
we're
going
to
look
at
the
asian
dilution
of
the
of
the
voice
and
also
look
to
see
whether
we're
diluting
the
latino
voice.
B
Thank
you,
councilman.
Let
me
just
go
back
to
a
conversation
I
had
with
nora
freeman,
which
I
asked
our
city
attorney.
Are
there
any
concerns
around
voting
rights,
act
or
other
legal
requirements
as
we
look
at
redistricting,
given
the
demographic
changes
we've
seen
in
our
city
nora,
could
you
just
tell
us
what
you
told
me.
D
Sure
mayor,
thank
you
and-
and
it
is
correct
that
there
are
potentially
reasons
in
every
district
for
the
results
of
district
voting,
but
we
know
from
a
review
of
the
various
council
districts
and
the
demographics
that
there
are
at
least
some
facial
concerns
about
potential
voting
rights,
act,
issues
and
potential
representation
issues,
and
the
representation
by
asian
americans
certainly
is
one
that
jumps
out,
and
we
know
we
have
a
community
that
abuts
san
jose.
That
has
had
some
of
those
issues.
D
So
it's
something
that
we're
aware
of
and
and
just
want
to
make
sure
that
they're,
that
the
decisions
that
are
made
on
redistricting
are
done
in
a
way
that
are
fair
to
everyone
and
limit
the
potential
for
litigation.
D
We've
advised
the
council
previously.
I
think
I
said
this
yesterday
that,
while
race
and
ethnicity
cannot
be
a
predominant
factor
in
redistricting
over
other
traditional
criteria,
the
council
is
permitted
to
take
steps
to
create
majority
minority
districts
when
necessary
to
comply
with
the
voting
rights
act.
So
we
intend
to
review
all
of
these
changes
and
just
ensure
that
the
city
and
the
council
are
in
the
best
position.
D
B
Thank
you
all
right.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
again
we're
being
fully
transparent.
I
don't
believe
anyone's
acted
in
bad
faith,
but
we
do
have
to
be
concerned
about
these
legal
issues
that
were
expressed
to
me
a
week
ago
because
of
the
significant
change
in
demographics
of
our
city.
We
are
much
more
asian-american
than
we
have
been
we're
now
38,
it's
the
largest
plurality
of
any
racial
group.
We
have
no
asian
americans
on
the
redistricting
commission.
E
E
Happy
to
to
to
support
this
analysis,
although
I
do
question
the
the
timing
of
it
when
these
changes
were
happening
for
d2
d9
d10,
there
wasn't
any
objection
in
the
moment
or
even
as
these
changes
accumulated
d6
alone
would
create
a
consternation
for
me
from
the
get-go.
E
Although
there
were
other
things
that
I
was
discussing,
but
I
I
needed
to
wait
for
the
moment
to
actually
bring
this
issue
up,
but
as
we
were
moving
through
the
process,
this
does
this
seems
to
be
an
afterthought,
rather
than
something
that
that
was
guiding
this
decision
to
make
this
enough
about
the
disbursement
of
dove
hill.
E
I've
had
two
closures
on
the
evergreen
school
district
schools
that
has
created
a
flurry
of
disbursement
of
families
to
different
schools
and,
as
you
all
know,
stability
for
children
is
so
important,
and
that's
part
of
the
consideration
that
I
gave
when
in
in
accepting
a
portion
of
this
of
this
district
seven
into
district
eight,
my
district
is,
is
predominantly
asian
at
least
sixty
percent.
E
I
think
that's
the
number.
If
I'm
off,
please
don't
quote
me
but
I'll
just
be
safe
to
say
the
majority
is
and
and
there's
a
difference
between
there's
a
nuance
between
the
different
asian
communities
in
our
district,
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
note
that
it,
the
the
communities
that
are
coming
into
district
8,
would
probably
be
more
republican,
would
probably
vote
more
conservative
and
yet
because
I
know
that
this
is
the
right
thing
to
do
for
this
particular
community.
E
That
believes
that's
always
in
my
district
to
accept
it
as
part
of
of
district
8.
They
already
identify
themselves
as
such,
and
and
sometimes
that's
that's
really
important
and
important
enough.
E
So
so
anyways,
I'm
not
gonna
delay
the
vote
anymore.
But
I
do
think
that
there's
that
that
we
should
have
the
professor
who
came
in
last
week
reviews
some
of
the
decisions
that
we've
gone
over
today
to
see.
If
there
really
is
any
legal
issues,
and
I
respect
our
district
attorney
to
the
off
degree,
I
have
a
high
respect
for
her.
E
Yet
every
lawyer
has
their
own
different
domain
and
area
that
they're
experts
in,
and
I
would
like
to
have
somebody
who
is
an
expert
who
can
tell
us
if
there
is
any
cause
of
concern
for
some
of
the
changes
that
were
being
made
not
only
to
d7,
d8
and
d5,
but
also
to
d2,
d9
and
d10.
So
I
look
forward
to
seeing
what
that
looks
like
thank
you.
B
Thank
you
cast
member
yeah.
I
would
just
emphasize.
If
we're
going
to
get
legal
advice
on
this,
it
really
should
come
from
attorneys.
The
experts
can
certainly
opine
in
various
ways,
but
it
should
be
the
attorneys
that
advise
us
so
so,
hopefully
we'll
we'll
get
that
clear
counsel
from
our
our
attorneys
and
any
attorney
legal
outside
legal
help.
They
might
want
to
solicit.
D
Mayor
I
just
want,
may
I
address
just
the
concerns
that
are
being
expressed.
We
will
be
reviewing
this
with
our
expert
and
and
we'll
be
reviewing
all
of
these
changes
and
the
impacts
on
all
of
the
districts.
So
I
want
to
make
sure
everyone
understands
that
and
if
there
are
legal
concerns
we
will
certainly
share
those
with
the
council,
but
we
will
be
looking
at
everything
because
there's
been
a
lot
of
movement,
so
I
just
want
to
be
clear
on
that.
B
And
just
go
to
this
issue
around
timing
reason
why
I
raised
it
now
is
first
of
all,
we
now
have
a
draft
map
to
consider
so
it's
time
for
us
to
look
at
these
very
carefully
these
issues-
and
I
raised
this
particular
one
in
this
district
because,
unlike
the
other
four
districts,
you
identified
councilmember
arenas,
none
of
them
touch
on
the
specific
issue
I
raised,
which
was
the
very
specific
legal
vulnerability
that
I
was
made
aware
of
a
week
or
two
ago,
which
is
that
we
have
a
very
fast-growing
population
that
is
not
being
represented
in
our
council
right
now,
nor
on
our
redistricting
commission.
B
And
so
so
that's
why
I'm
raising
it
and
that's
why
I'm
raising
in
the
context
of
that
district,
and
I
think,
we've
been
informed
by
our
experts
that
their
particular
attention
goes
to
those
districts
which
are
majority
or
in
heavily
what
I
think
they
call
districts
of
influence,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
meaning
a
very
high
plurality
of
members
of
a
protected
class,
a
particular
racial
group,
and
that's
that's
why
I'm
raising
it
there
and
I
think,
that's
where
the
lawyers
will
raise
it
as
well.
So,
that's
why
I
want
us
to
pay
attention.
G
Sparsen,
thank
you
and
because
this
is
my
district
I'd
like
to
add
a
few
things
and
clarify
some
things.
So
district
7
has
always
had
a
majority
latino
population,
but
a
majority
asian
voter
population.
G
It
has
always
been
that
way
and-
and
the
fact
is
and-
and
this
map
maintains
that
and
the
fact
is
from
madison
wynn
going
all
the
way
back
to
iola
williams,
council
members
have
had
to
have
coalitions
to
get
elected
in
district,
seven
they've
built
coalitions
and,
and
that's
what
community
is
about
and
and
so
this
map
does
not
change
the
historical
racial
makeup
of
district
7.
It
maintains
the
latino
population,
which
has
always
been
there.
It
maintains
the
higher
higher
asian
population
in
district
7,
which
is
what
it
was
in
2010.
G
So
again
this
isn't
about
politics,
and
I
I
actually
am
offended
by
the
fact
by
the
consistent
comments
looking
at
us
that
that
there
are
no
asians
on
the
council,
I
would
love
to
have
asians
on
the
council.
I
think
that's
a
good
thing
to
have
the
city
well
represented,
but
the
fact
is
when
latinos
were
underrepresented.
I
didn't
hear
those
comments
about
latinos
being
underrepresented
on
the
council
for
years.
The
fact
that
we
have
five
now,
which
has
been
brought
up
consistently
through
this
process.
G
I
don't
think
it's
happened
ever
and
instead
of
taking
it
something
that
we
should
be
proud
of
in
our
city,
it's
it's
being
brought
up
as
something
derogatory,
so
this
map
does
not
change
the
history
of
district
seven
and,
as
I
said,
one
of
the
things
that
we
are
tasked
with
looking
at
in
the
redistricting
process
is
schools
and
in
the
evergreen
school
district
there
have
been
a
lot
of
changes,
and
I
I
would
also
say
this
publicly-
is
there
there
might
be
other
changes
in
the
future
within
that
school
district,
and
so
the
families
in
that
school
district
are
getting
moved
around
and
again.
G
This
is
not
about
politics.
I
won
in
dove
hill
in
2018.
This
is
about
what's
doing
right
for
the
for
the
community,
it's
about
what's
doing
best
by
the
families
in
that
area
who
are
now
having
to
move
farther
out
of
their
neighborhood
into
the
other
parts
of
evergreen
and
and
having
that
make
sense.
G
B
Ready
to
vote
that's
a
very
reasonable
conclusion:
we'll
have
the
data
and
we'll
be
able
to
analyze
it.
Let
me
emphatically
reject
the
notion,
there's
something
derogatory
in
anything.
I
said
I
am
concerned
about
complying
with
the
voting
rights
act.
This
is
specific
to
the
issue
that
was
raised
to
me
and
that's
why
and-
and
I
believe
nora
has
just
indicated-
it
is
concern
for
all
of
us.
D
B
D
There
was
a
discussion
about
the
impacts
of
the
change
in
population
and
what
that
means
in
redistricting,
with
with
the
entire
council.
Yes,.
B
Okay,
all
right
councilmember
arenas,
your
hand's
still
up.
Okay,
I
I
think
we
have
a
motion.
Let's
vote.
I
K
A
J
B
Okay,
I
don't
think
we
have
anything
more
unless
anyone
has
remaining
issue
all
right.
Let's
do
we
need
public
comment.
We
had
it.
Last
night
we
had
public
comment
last
night,
let's
adjourn
the
meeting
and
we'll
resume
again
on
tuesday
on
this
particular
issue.
Thank
you.