►
From YouTube: JAN 26, 2021 | City Council Evening Session
Description
City of San José, California
City Council Meeting of January 26, 2021, Evening Session
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=825860&GUID=1D88A670-E65F-4DB5-867F-3AA177AE10BD
B
D
A
A
E
Yes,
good
evening,
council
sb1421,
I
mean
it's
real
simple.
The
the
police
officers
union
is
in
violation
of
the
law.
The
police
department
is
in
violation
of
the
law,
yet
they
enforce
the
law.
This
is.
This
is
like,
like
confusing
to
me.
They've
had
two
years
in
order
to
obey
this
law.
Now
we
got
homeboy
bovar
on
the
east
side
laying
dead
in
the
street
okay
and
he
had
absolutely
no
weapon.
Yet
three
officers
fired.
E
I
could
see
if
one
officer
felt
threatened.
Three
officers
is
an
execution
they
held
court
in
the
street.
This
is
offensive.
This
should
be
offensive
to
every
single
member
on
this
council,
including
the
officer.
That's
this
listening
officer,
tin
or
captain
tindall.
You
should
be
offended
by
what
your
officers
did
to
this
human
being.
You
ain't
the
judge,
you
ain't
the
jury.
We
got
prosecutors
for
that.
We've
got
judges
for
that.
We've
got
a
process
that
tovar
was
denied.
E
These
are
the
types
of
issues
that
we're
talking
about
and
we
need
a
chief
that
is
going
to
be
able
to
sit
there
and
have
the
humility
to
accept
that
there
is
racism
existent
in
that
police
department.
There
are
officers
that
do
not
that
are
not
worthy
of
wearing
the
badge
that
says
san
jose
pd.
They
are
not
worthy
to
stand
and
to
protect
the
citizens
of
my
community.
E
Okay,
they
just
are
not,
and
we
need
an
officer
that
has
the
humility
and
the
fortitude
to
be
able
to
address
these
issues
and
start
cleaning
some
house
that
facebook
page,
where
all
of
these
officers
were
talking
about
creating
nooses
to
hang
a
woman
in
a
hijab.
This
is
disgusting,
it
is
offensive
and
this
department
needs
to
have
the
humility
to
accept
it
as
such.
Thank
you.
A
D
Hi,
thank
you
good
words
by
paul
soto.
Thank
you.
These
times
may
be
difficult,
but
consider
they
may
only
be
a
reflection
of
state
government
to
the
international
level
continuously
practicing
forms
of
state-sponsored
violence,
extremism,
shock
doctrine
and
disaster.
Capitalism.
D
I
feel
these
issues
again.
The
these
these
times
may
be
difficult,
but
most
everyday
people
from
local
areas
are
not
difficult
and
where
local
community
and
where
local
people
are
difficult
at
this
time,
I
feel
most
in
some
way
do
want
to
make
make
amends
and
do
well
for
their
friends,
their
neighbors,
their
neighborhood
and
their
community.
D
D
Thinking
at
this
time,
as
I
have
written
and
spoken
about
many
times
now,
deputy
chief
chief,
anthony
mata
is
fluent
in
espanol
and
has
good
temperament
has
a
good
temperament
that
can
work
well
with
all
parts
of
the
community
and
with
the
issues
I've
addressed
above.
I
feel
this
is
an
important
time
in
history
for
him
to
become
police
chief.
If
nothing
else,
he
seems
to
have
a
gentle,
intelligent,
progressive,
inclusive
thinking.
That
may
be
an
important
example
in
the
search
of
a
new
police
chief
at
this
time.
D
Thank
you
for
the
words
of
paul
soto.
I
mean
we're
simply
at
a
time
to
really
bring
out
the
better
parts
of
ourselves
and,
and
we
need
to
look
for
a
police
chief
that
will,
you
know,
be
a
part
of
the
that
work
and
effort.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you.
The
person
with
the
phone
number
ending
5140.
G
I
also
hope
that
they
do
hire
the
guy
from
minnesota,
because
it'd
be
funny
to
actually
watch
some
san
jose
pd
retreat
like
minneapolis,
didn't,
have
the
police
department
burned
down?
Could
you
imagine
that,
probably
not
but
yeah?
I.
I
hope
that
the
police
chief
is
able
to
protect
all
citizens
of
this
of
this
town
based
not
based
on
their
politics
or
anything
else,
and
that's
what
eddie,
garcia
and
sam
licardo
did
in
june
of
2016..
G
Protect
the
trump
supporters
a
couple
weeks
ago,
oddly
enough,
they
were
protected
because
of
the
shame
that
the
san
jose
police
department
did
250
guys
standing
around
playing
pocket
pool.
It
was
disgraceful.
It
was
clear
on
any
any
video.
You
saw
how
they
count,
how
they
they
were
cowards
that
day
and
did
absolutely
nothing.
They
wouldn't
even
help
people
up
after
they
were
hit
on
their
head
knocked
out.
I've
never
seen
something
so
disgraceful.
A
And
the
ones
that
come
from
san
jose
you're
not
speaking
again
tonight,
there's
no
use
of
expletives
during
these
meetings.
Sharon
danila.
I
Thank
you
for
that.
I'm
sure
to
know
I'm
here
today
as
an
individual
of
about
20
years
of
experience
in
the
criminal
justice
system
with
research,
prison
reform,
mental
health
and
most
folks
know
me
from
my
work
here
doing
working
on
human
trafficking.
I
I
wanted
to
state
that
I'm
asking
the
city
to
consider
a
chief
who
can
create
immediate
changes
and
begin
to
shift
culture
and
partnership
with
community.
I
ask
choose
a
candidate
who
knows
the
culture
and
history
of
the
police
department
itself
in
san
jose,
but
also
knows
a
history
and
diversity
of
these
in
our
city.
This
past
year
has
prompted
the
need
for
immediate
change.
So
much
of
the
defund
conversation
relies
on
collaboration
with
community-based
organizations
advocates
and
services.
I
So
I
asked
the
next
chief
have
a
demonstrated
partner
has
demonstrated
partnership
with
regards
to
community-based
organizations
in
this
kind
of
work,
especially
with
regards
to
marginalized
communities
in
terms
of
working
on
issues
of
gender-based
violence.
We
have
seen,
and
we
anticipate
further
increases
to
exploitation
and
abuse
due
to
increased
isolation,
marginalization
and
economic
desperation.
That's
the
next
chief
prioritize
special
victims
and
have
a
demonstrated
experience
on
this
issue.
A
Thank
you.
Let's
return
to
the
council
dave.
I
know
you.
You
wanted
to
make
some
comments.
First,
before
we
jump
into
comments
from
the
council
yeah.
J
Thank
you
mayor.
You
know.
K
This
item
is
is
for
the
adoption
of
the
policy
and
questions
that
we
would
provide
to
the
final
candidate.
I
I
do
want
to
update
the
cam,
the
council
in
public
around
four
o'clock.
Today
we
did
get
word
of
the
withdrawal
of
one
of
the
external
candidates
from
the
process.
This
is
actually
the
second
withdrawal
from
when
the
time
we've
made
our
our
finalists
list,
so
the
the
police
chief
from
minneapolis
has
withdrawn.
K
You
know,
through
this
process
we're
we're
looking
to
achieve
a
candidate
pool
that
is
obviously
diverse
and
also
what
we
were
hoping
to
achieve
is
is
a
mix
of
internal
and
external
perspectives,
and
so-
and
this
is
no
discredit
to
our
internal
candidates-
I
just
think
for
for
us
as
a
city,
it's
important
that
we
have
these
different
perspectives
and
are
able
to
evaluate
them
through
the
process,
so
we'll
need
to
regroup
a
bit
and
we'll
do
that
over
the
next
day
or
so,
but
just
wanted
to
make
sure
the
council
had
this
latest
information
that
is
probably
out
in
the
media
by
now
as
well.
K
So
and
we
stand
ready
to
answer
any
questions,
and
certainly
we
have
reviewed
all
the
memos
that
have
been
submitted
and
look
forward
to
incorporating
all
of
the
the
questions
into
the
process.
As
we
move
forward,
hey
steve,
councilmember.
A
H
Yeah,
thank
you
and
appreciate.
G
That
update
I,
I
was
not
aware
of
that
and
I
think.
H
Dave,
I
know
so
we
have
one
remaining
external
candidate,
then
correct,
that's,
correct
and
and
that
candidate
jeremy
bowers
was
actually
formerly
with
san
jose
pd
as
well,
so
he's
external
at
the
moment,
but
but
had
obviously
had
a
history
with
the
city.
H
That's
correct!
Okay,
thank
you.
We'll
look
forward
to
kind
of
hearing
back.
I
think
you
know
I
don't
know
if
it's
something
that
you're
able
to
to
to
share,
but
hopefully
checking
in
privately
kind
of
getting
an
understanding
of
of.
I
think
we
had
two
sort
of
last
minute
withdrawals
from
the
from
the
process,
so
we'd
like
to
learn
more
as
we
move
forward,
but.
G
H
Stick
to
at
least
for
now
the
questions
and
I
apologize.
I
was
not
able
to
get
these
in
writing,
but
I
wanted
to
add
two
and
then
had
an
opportunity
to
look
over
my
colleagues
and-
and
I
think,
obviously,
everything
sort
of
worthy
of
being
added
into
the
the
to
the
process
here.
So
recently,
dallas
pd
made
headlines
and
it
wasn't
just
for
hiring
eddie.
They
announced
that
they
would
no
longer
be
responding
to
certain
calls
for
service
like
stolen
cars.
H
Reckless
damage
runaway
kids
stuff
like
that,
and
this
is
actually
right
prior
to
to
chief
garcia
headed
over
there
are
heading
over
there.
H
It
was
quickly
rescinded
just
recently
in
and
made
clear
that
now,
let's
make
clear
that
these
were
only
recommendations
from
an
internal
study
and
that
they
had
not
been
finalized
yet,
but
I
do
think
the
concept
is
worth
discussion
and
we're
hearing
that
happening
all
across
the
country,
and
so
the
question
I'd
like
to
add
would
be
I'd
like
to
know
what
calls
for
service
our
candidates
believe
should
be
looked
at
and
considered
as
no
longer
requiring
a
police
officer
response,
and
maybe
rather
another
professional.
H
Could
could
respond
and
then
the
second
question
similarly
we'll
be
asking
our
next
chief
to
help
us
lead
our
reimagining
public
safety
process
and
I'd
like
to
ask
our
candidates
how
they
feel
about
stepping
into
that
process.
And
how
do
they
plan
to
generate
participation
and
buy
in
from
officers?
H
And
so
I'd
like
to
add
those
two
and
well,
I
guess
sorry,
the
last
one
was
two
questions,
one
part
and
then
the
first
one
was
one
question,
but
I'd
like
to
add
those
and
then
I'm
I'm,
I'm
assuming
my
colleagues
want
to
talk
about
their
memorandums,
but
I'm
happy
to
to
support
all
of
those
requests
as
well.
H
Yeah,
that's
what
I'll
do
so
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
questions
I
just
added
and
then
all
of
the
memorandums
submitted
by
my
colleagues.
A
Exactly
thank
you.
Councilman.
L
Thank
you,
and
I
did
want
to
follow
up
on
the
announcement.
Did
I
miss
why
why
they
pulled
out.
K
I
didn't
say
you
know
they're,
it's
somewhat
speculative
on
on
our
part
council
members,
so
I'm
not
sure
I
feel
comfortable.
You
know
repeating
the
speculation.
A
L
Right
sure,
I
think
it's
relevant
because
we
are
providing
questions
and
it
is
timely
and
it's
public
and
I
understand
the
noticing
and
the
agendizing.
I
just.
I
think
that
we
as
a
council
should
have
that
discussion
in
public.
L
We
went
on
a
search
and
you
know,
did
some
contracts
and
and-
and
I
have
some
questions
about
that
process
and
I
think
the
community
does
as
well
and
and
we
should
have
that
discussion
in
public.
So
that's
that's
what
I
will
say
about
that.
A
Could
I
suggest
that
maybe
you
make
a
friendly
amendment
to
councilman
perales
to
agendize
that
either
an
open
session
or
closed
session
or
group?
You
prefer.
L
Sure-
and
I
so
I'll
make
that
amendment
if
council
spyro
perales,
will
accept
that
amendment
yeah
and
I'll
leave
that
to
dave
sykes
and
laura
freeman
on
whether
that
is
an
open
or
closed
session.
I
do
think
we
owe
it
to
the
public
to
give
some
information,
but
understand
that
all
are
part
of
that
discussion
will
need
to
be
in
closed
or
open
sessions.
So
that's
my
amendment.
L
Thank
you,
and
so
I
wanted
to
talk
about
a
few
things,
and
I
I
the
reason
I
submitted
a
memo
and
I
wasn't
as
specific
as
our
vice
mayor
and
some
of
my
colleagues
who
did
some
wordsmithing
in
their
memos.
I
did
put
in
the
language
and
I
specifically
looked
at
question
five.
L
Our
problem
is
not
it's,
I
mean
yes,
we
have
hiring
issues,
but
I
think
that's
more
budgetary
issues
in
terms
of
bodies,
but
we
actually
have
a
very
diverse
police
force
in
in
the
rank
and
file
where
we're
we've
all
been
to
our,
not
our
two
new
colleagues
will
get
to
go
to
a
graduation
which
is
super
exciting
and
it's
just
so
much
fun
and-
and
you
can
see
how
diverse
the
sjpd
really
is.
L
You
know
when
it
comes
to
the
rank
and
file
where
it's
not
diverse,
is
at
the
top
and
we
have
a
command
staff
in
an
extremely
diverse
city.
We
often
brag
about
having
the
largest
latino
population
in
northern
california.
We
brag
about
we
fight
with
orange
county
about
who
can
who
has
the
largest
vietnamese-american
population,
but
we're
the
city
and
they're
the
county.
L
So
we
each
kind
of
get
number
one
in
that
regard,
right
and
and
and
we
have
just
how
many
languages
spoken
at
home,
throughout
our
city
and
and
and
we
have
a
command
staff
that
is
all
white
except
one
right
and
and
so,
when
I
read
question
five,
we
have
a
diverse
pool
of
talent.
We
have
that
and
and
and
but
it's
not
moving
up,
and
so
I
wanted
to
explain
that.
L
L
Another
aspect
of
that
question
that
I
submitted
that,
I
think
is
important
is
that
you
know
all
of
the
candidates
are
leaders.
They
are
all
leaders,
and
so
what
I
want
to
hear
is,
and
what
I
think
the
community
deserves
to
hear,
is
what
have
they
already
done
within
their
leadership
positions
that
they
have
held
up
up
to
date?
What
have
they
done?
Not
what?
What
will
they
do?
Not
just
what
will
they
do
once
they
become
chief,
but
what
will
they
do?
L
What
have
they
already
done
to
to
promote
the
kind
of
to
be
more
inclusive
that
our
city
deserves
to
have,
and
then
I
wanted
to
give
some
feedback
on
another
question
that
I
posed,
because
I
think
it's
important,
and
so
the
other
question
I
submitted
was
that
a
few
months
ago,
racist
facebook
posts
were
made
by
current
and
former
sjpd
officers,
and
these
posts
were
exposed
by
the
media
and
what
will
a
as
chief
right?
What
will
you
do
to
weed
out
this
type
of
racism
and
xenophobia
so
that
it
never
happens
again?
L
L
We
need
a
chief
that
does
not
normalize
this
behavior,
and
so
and
lastly,
I
mean
I,
I
don't
feel
that
we
as
a
city
have
have
gotten
answers
whenever
things
like
this
come
up,
and
so
our
public
deserves
to
have
that
conversation,
and
so
so
I
just
wanted
to
explain
why
I
submitted
those
questions
and
what
I
was
looking
for,
particularly
in
that
first
question:
it's
not
that
we
don't
have
talent.
We
have
a
lot
of
talent
here
at
sjpd.
D
M
I
Thank
you
mayor.
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
good
questions
that
the
city
manager
already
had,
and
my
colleagues
have
some
really
good
questions
that
they're,
adding
and
council
member
esparza.
You
actually
are
on
point.
If,
if
you
look
at
my
questions
that
I
asked
it
was
actually
around
what
have
you
done
so
I
think
that
I
think
you're
really
on
point
with
with
that
observation.
I
So
if
I
can,
I
don't
know
if
that
needs
to
be
a
friendly
amendment
or
or
just
if
I
can
get
some
head
see
some
heads
nodding,
but
I
like
to
give
the
city
manager
that
kind
of
flexibility.
A
I
A
Want
to
give
everyone
a
chance
to
get
a
chance
to
respond.
Okay,
casper
around
us.
L
A
I
So
I
I'll
make
a
friendly
amendment
to
okay
to
give
the
city
manager
the
flexibility
to
either
consolidate
or
group
like
or
similar
questions
together.
A
All
right
and
councilman
pros
so.
H
I'm
I'm
not
totally
against
it,
but
I
would
be
concerned
that
we're
gonna,
you
know
the
interpretation
of
the
city
manager
may
be
different
than
to
make
the
maker
of
the
question.
So
if
the
city
manager
can
touch
base
with
whoever
it
was
that
propose
the
question
and
let
them
know
sort
of
what
their
intent
is
to
combine
before
they
do
so,
then
I'm
fine
with
that
for
the
moment.
A
Okay,
cancer
awareness.
N
Thank
you,
I'm
not
my
my
comments.
Kind
of
already
been
made
by
by
those
have
been
spoken,
so
I'm
gonna
keep
it
short.
Thank
you,
councilmember
perales,
for
including
my
memo
that
that
includes
some
of
my
questions,
and
you
know
I,
my
questions
were
really
around
race
and
equity,
and
so
I
agree
with
with
vice
mayor
in
that
I
think,
there's
some
group
natural
groupings,
and
actually
I
wanted
to
spend
some
time
cross-referencing.
N
Some
of
our
questions,
because
I
think
some
of
them
are
are
are
might
be
interpreted
the
same
but
they're
slightly
different.
I
think
you
had
something
about
a
being
an
agent
of
change
vice
mayor,
and
we
also
I
you
know,
I
also
submitted
something
that
had
about
how
to
how
to
create
change
internally.
N
So
I
think
there
are
some
natural
groupings
there,
but
you
know,
hopefully
the
the
questions
can
can
elicit
really
what
we
want
and
and
at
the
heart
of
of
our
questions,
and
I
think
our
city
manager
does
a
really
good
job
of
understanding
where
we're
coming
from.
So
the
the
only
thing
that
I
wanted
to
just
re-
just
you
know
underline,
is
something
that
councilmember
esparza
said,
and
that
is
that
we
actually
have
the
talent
here
in
our
own
backyard,
and
I
appreciate
that
we
did
this
national
search.
N
But
the
truth
is
that
san
jose
police
department
has
a
lot
of
talented
officers
that
are
doing
a
really
great
job
and
keeping
us
safe
with
the
amount
of
officers
per.
You
know,
the
amount
of
population,
the
ratio,
population
and-
and
I
think
that
that
there
is
an
issue
in
terms
of
how
we
continue
to
invest
for
those
police
officers
that
want
to
grow
and
rank.
N
What
is
the
path
forward
for
them?
How
do
we
lead
them
to
to
to
be
deputy
chiefs
or
to
be
a
captain
or
a
sergeant,
and
and-
and
I
think
that
that
kind
of
culture,
or,
if
there's
a
culture,
that
we
need
to
examine
it
and
really
have
a
difficult
conversation?
N
Put
it
really
out
there,
and
so
I
I
just
want
to
remind
our
city
manager,
and
those
folks
who
are
part
of
the
interviewing
process
is
that
we
have
to
take
a
look
at
somebody:
who's
willing
to
break
the
norms
and
who's
really
who's
gonna
be
face
forward
who's,
gonna,
look
at
these
issues
in
the
eye
and
say
no
more
and
who's
going
to
breathe
life
into
the
mission
statement
that
we
have
here
and,
and
I'm
think,
I'm
thankful
that
we're
going
to
include
racial
equity
as
part
of
that.
N
So
you
know
those
are
the
elements
that
I'm
looking
for.
I
think
we
have
those
elements,
those
attributes
in
the
folks
that
are
in
the
running
now,
and
we
have
to
be
careful
about
who
we
choose
so
that
we
not
only
break
some
of
the
norms
that
create
walls
for
some
of
our
officers
that
are
of
color
that
can't
get
to
the
next
rank
and
actually
have
to
leave
our
office
and
all
that
investment
in
all
in
those
officers
or
those
high-ranking
level.
Officers
goes
to
another
city.
N
D
No
problem-
and
I
think
what
we're
going
to
do
is
probably
have
to
make
another
amendment
just
to
add
my
questions,
because
I,
like
councilman
peralta,
wasn't
able
to
submit
a
memo.
So
I
just
want
to
read
off
my
my
three
questions:
if
that's
okay
and
we
can
send
them
off
to
staff
just
to
confirm
the
language
after
the
fact
that
that's
okay,
so
so
my
three
questions,
one
is
obviously
we
know
that
the
black
lives
matters.
D
Movement
is
a
consequential
movement
that
just
recently
took
hold
in
the
united
states
and
certainly
in
our
city,
and
so
one
of
the
one
of
the
questions
I
had
is:
what
does
the
black
lives
matter?
Movement
mean
to
you.
D
I
think
that's
an
important
thing
to
explore
and
the
other
question
is
you
know,
and
I'm
just
gonna
read
the
language
directly.
I
guess
said,
but
it
can
be
framed
in
different
ways,
but
in
san
jose
there
was
major
controversy
over
how
our
police,
department
and
city
responded
to
the
george
floyd
demonstrations
in
2020.
D
That
was
the
second
question.
The
very
last
question.
I
think
it's
a
equally
important
question
is:
do
you
believe
that
local
law
enforcement
should
be
collaborating
with
federal
agencies
such
as
immigration
and
customs
enforcement,
and
that's
it,
and
then
we
can
send
that
to
so
so
I'd
ask
for
a
friendly
amendment,
but
we
can
also
send
this
to
staff,
so
they
have
the
language
assuming
that
it
gets
adopted.
A
Okay
and
so.
A
Okay,
kevin
is,
could
I
probe
a
little
bit
on
that
last
one,
because
we
already
have
a
policy
that
says
we?
Don't
we
don't
commun,
we
don't
collaborate
with
ice
in
any
way
on
on
immigration
enforcement.
Do
you
do
you
also?
A
D
A
Okay,
all
right
any
other
questions
all
right.
Let's
vote
then.
L
A
Item
3.6
is
amendment
to
the
city
of
san
jose's
2021
legislative
program.
I
don't
know
that
everyone's
on
the
legislative
affairs
team
is
aware
of
it.
There's
an
additional
item
that
we're
working
up
through
the
us
mayor's
conference
and
several
key
legislators
around
potential
inclusion
of
funding
in
a
relief
bill
that
would
include
dollars
for
a
jobs
program
for
young
adults
from
low-income,
neighborhoods
and
various
other
measures
that
identify
need
addition
to
income
and
that
may
be
getting
some
traction.
A
It
looks
like
with
the
conference
and
with
a
couple
folks
on
the
senate
side,
and
so
I
wanted
to
ask
whoever
makes
the
motion
they
might
make
include
as
an
amendment
inclusion
of
a
jobs
program
for
low-income
young
adults
related
to
resiliency,
particularly
that
is
pandemic
relief,
climate
change
and
other
programs.
L
Thank
you
mayor.
I
had
a
question
actually
I
I
have
some
comments
on
this
item
for
later,
but
I
had
a
quick
question
on
this,
which
was,
would
that
be
subject
to
an
rfp.
A
Yeah,
what
was
being
currently
discussed
is
a
pilot
program
that
would
we
would
we
would
be
in
order
to
get
the
funding.
A
It
would
be
competitive
program,
so
we'd
have
to
be
able
to
win
the
federal
money,
and
then
we
could
use
federal
money
as
a
local
match,
and
then
we
could
either
administer
it,
but
more
likely
we
would
be
administering
through
a
network
of
non-profits
much
as
we're
doing,
for
example,
with
the
climate
corps
program
with
the
governor,
we're
relying
on
folks,
like
our
city
forest,
to
to
be
able
to
take
on
the.
In
that
case,
americorps
fellows,
who
then
manage
the
program.
A
L
Okay,
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
clear.
I
know
it's
early
and
it
would
eventually
come
to
us,
but
I've
wanted
to
make
that
desire,
clear,
okay
and
and
then
I'm
assuming
staff
is
gonna,
make
a
presentation
so
I'll
raise
my
hand
later
or.
M
Yeah,
we
actually
don't
have
any
slides.
I
just
wanted
to
to
update
the
council.
This
is
staff
coming
back
just
to
amend
our
legislative
guiding
principles
for
the
year
based
off
of
council
member
humanitas
jimenez's
memo
from
december
4th
and
last
week's
conversation
from
january
12th
again,
the
language
in
the
legislative
guiding
document
that
we've
put
in
is
fairly
broad,
the
tactics
and
what
we're
deciding
to
advocate
for,
depending
on
the
situation,
we're
in
we'll
go
ahead
and
change,
and
we
will
update
the
council
and
be
enlisting
you
on
those
tactics.
M
You
know
just
as
of
a
few
days
within
the
last
few
days
anyway,
and
we've
all
heard
in
the
news
and
we
updated
you
our
greatest
challenge.
Right
now
is
vaccine
supplies.
So,
council,
member
carrasco,
along
with
supervisor
chavez,
have
sent
in
letters
to
the
governor.
The
mayor
on
behalf
of
the
city,
sent
letters
to
the
senate
and
assembly
budget
chairs
in
the
early
budget
process,
also
asking
for
additional
funding
and
access
to
the
vaccine,
and
so
this
is
our
advocate
advocacy.
M
Priority
right
now
is
access
to
the
vaccine,
but
as
written
in
the
document
as
we
get
additional
access
to
the
vaccine,
we
are
going
to
be
advocating
for
funding
around
communications
on
ground
transportation
and
a
host
of
other
things
to
ensure
that
those
that
need
to
be
vaccinated
and
those
that
are,
you
know,
feeling
the
adverse
effects
the
hardest
for
cobit
19
are
first
in
line
for
that
program,
so
the
document
is
meant
to
be
flexible
and
nimble
for
us
to
adjust
attack
our
tactics,
given
the
situation
we're
in
with
all
of
the
changing
kind
of
performance
measures
and
updates
from
the
federal
and
state
government
within
the
last
few
days.
M
So
with
that
both
alexandria
and
I
are
available
for
any
questions,
the
council
might
have.
L
Thank
you
mayor.
I
I
wanted
to
thank
you,
lee
and,
and
the
folks
on
your
team
for
really
listening
and
responding
to
the
needs
of
the
community,
and
I
know
council,
member
council
members
carrasco
at
anas.
Myself
talked
a
lot
about
what's
going
on
right
now
in
the
east
side
in
particular,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
thank
you.
L
I
think
this
is
really
important
work
at
a
very
critical
time
in
this
response,
and
so
I
I
went
through
the
memo
and
and
really
appreciate
that
covid
vaccine
access,
outreach
and
prioritization
statement
in
particular
and
for
for
people
that
might
be
watching
or
listening
the
their
five
zip
codes
in
east
san
jose
account
for
nearly
30
percent
of
santa
clara
county's
total
covid
cases.
L
What's
not
in
the
report
is
the
city
of
san
jose
represents
two-thirds
of
santa
clara
county's
covent
cases,
so
we're
we're
about
half
the
county,
but
we're
about
two-thirds
of
all
of
the
covent
cases
in
santa
clara
county
and
so
there's
certainly
a
lot
of
need
throughout
the
city,
and
I
wanted
to
also
point
out
that
two
things
I
I
wanted
to
really
highlight
the
statement
to
expand
the
community
resource
navigators
to
target
services
in
heavily
impacted
areas
to
connect
vulnerable
residents
to
social
and
economic
resources
beyond
vaccines.
L
L
Outreach
is
how
much
help
how
much
help
people
really
need
in
just
accessing
that
accessing
those
resources
filling
out
the
state
application
right,
filling
out
the
federal
application
and
and
getting
that
help
in
your
own
language
has
made
a
huge
difference
for
the
residents
of
our
city,
and
I
know
that
this
is
the
intergovernmental
relations
team.
But
we
have
a
lot
of
folks
in
our
economic
development
team
that
have
done
a
lot
of
work
and
a
lot
of
learning
around
this.
L
So
I
think
that's
really
important.
The
other
thing
that
I
wanted
to
mention,
as
it
relates
to
economic
recovery,
is
that
I
think
I've
posted
it
as
well,
but
ucsf
just
came
out
with
a
study
that
talked
about
how,
unsurprisingly,
essential
workers
are
getting
coveted
at
higher
rates
than
folks
that
are
able
to
work
at
home.
And
you
know
that's
for
a
couple
of
reasons.
L
L
And
lastly,
I
know
it's
one
of
the
things
that's
in
the
news,
but
I
wanted
to
or
actually
you
know
what
I'll
save
up
for
another
item
so
I'll
just
leave
it
at
that
and
just
say.
Thank
you.
A
A
A
Councilman
raynes
your
hands
down
now:
okay,
I'll,
go
to
the
public
and
come
back
to
councilman
rennis.
She
may
be
having
a
problem
with
their
device.
Mr
soto.
E
Yes,
thank
you
mayor
paul,
simple
from
the
horseshoe.
I
really
never
thought
I
would
say
this,
but
I
actually
agree
with
you
mayor
licardo.
E
I
I
agree
with
your
position
on
the
program
of
financing
the
youngsters,
young
adults.
I
participated
in
the
speedy
program
way
back
in
the
80s
way.
Late,
70s
early
80s,
I
participated
in
the
speeding
program,
but
what
I
would
like
to
see-
and
that
was
beneficial.
E
You
know
I
mean
50
of
the
check
went
to
my
mother
and
50-
went
to
my
school
clothes
and
I
was
able
to
be
self-sufficient
and
you
know
mom's,
you
know
got
her
cut,
but
what
I
would
like
to
see
is
a
collaboration
between
that
program
and
the
suggestions
that
councilwoman
arenas
gave
earlier
on.
In
the
day.
E
I
think
her
ideas
were
just
her
statement
and
the
way
that
she
examined
how
the
pathway
that
the
city
has
at
least
some
responsibility
that,
if
we're
going
to
be
creating
these
programs
that
allow
kids
to
participate
in
in
high-tech
companies
and
for
internships
that
there
be
a
clear
pathway
that
they're
able
to
see
it
and
that
they're
able
to
walk
towards
it
with
regard
to
actually
seeing
themselves
viably
employed
within
these
tech
industries.
You
know,
historically,
we've
been
marginalized
out
of
these
types
of
in
this
type
of
employment.
E
That's
what
the
chicano
moratorium
was
about.
That
was
one
of
the
critical
pieces
of
the
chicano
moratorium
that
we
were
tired
of
being
relegated
and
we
were
tired
of
being
marginalized
into
vocational
areas
into
vocational
jobs.
You
know-
and
so
I
think
it
would
be-
a
really
good
collaboration
between
you
and
councilwoman
arenas
with
respect
to
the
coveted
money
and
the
young
adult
employment.
Thank
you.
E
A
N
Thank
you.
I
just
got
kicked
off
as
soon
as
you
called
me.
I
got
kicked
out.
Thank
you
mayor.
So
I
just
wanna.
N
Sorry,
I'm
trying
to
look
at
my
try
to
settle
myself
after
stressing
out
and
getting
back
on.
One
of
the
things
I
wanted
to
say
was
that
I
I
I
one
of
the
children
and
families
are
are
being
impacted.
Obviously
I
speak
from
a
very
personal
level,
and
I
know
many
of
you
have
children
at
home
that
that
you're
supporting
from
distance
learning-
and
I
know
that
our
our
president
has
proposed
some
children
family
initiatives
as
a
part
of
the
covert
responses.
N
So
I'm
hoping
that
I
could
hear
from
either
lee
or
alexandra
about.
You
know
your
thoughts
on
that,
and
I
know
that
we
have
already
family-friendly
existing
priorities
that
that
you're
already
supporting.
But
you
know
how
will
you
bring
those
forward?
Your
thoughts
about
that.
M
I'll
start
and
and
throw
it
over
to
alex
for
any
more
detail,
but
I
would
say
I
think
we
can
update
as
part
of
the
child
care
update
next
week
in
front
of
council.
M
I
think
we
could
go
over
particulars,
but
I
the
the
letter
that
I
referenced,
that
the
city
sent
in
to
the
senate
and
assembly
budget
chairs
yesterday
covered
a
variety
of
topics
and-
and
if
you
haven't
heard,
the
governor
is
trying
to
expedite
and
do
an
early
budget
process
for
for
a
variety
of
things,
and
we
really
advocated
for
four
things
in
that
letter,
which
is
around
homelessness
after
school
programs
and
additional
education
opportunities
for
kids
and
for
schools,
the
vaccine,
distribution
and
then
support
for
small
businesses
that
have
been
most
impacted
by
the
shutdown.
M
So
as
the
budget
process
takes
shape,
we
can
report
out
on
what
the
senate
and
assembly
are
doing
around
those
matters.
Council,
member.
N
Perfect,
I
appreciate
that
next,
on
on
items
I
wanted
to
talk
about
is
I
think
it
was
last
week
it
feels
like
like
a
month
ago,
but
last
week.
I
think
it
was
on
anyways.
N
Sometime
last
week,
I
I
joined
a
group
of
some
of
you
who
I
think,
council
member
foley
who
were
there,
and
this
was
a
group
of
latino
community
leaders
and
advocates
who'd,
come
together
for
some
time
to
compile
some
a
report,
and
it
was
based
on
community
feedback
and
the
direction
that
our
community
is
looking
for
in
terms
of
prevention
and
care
and
and
recovery.
N
I
think
that-
and
I
I
sent
this
to
you
already
lee-
I
believe
the
report-
if
I
haven't
please
remind
me-
but
I
I
you
know,
they
brought
up
some
really
good
points
about
some
of
the
some
of
the
gaps
in
services,
and
there
was
somebody
who
had
shared
their
experience
going
through
cancer
treatments
and
then
also
then
contracting
also
contracting
covid
and
how
she
slept
in
her
car
because
she
just
fell
through
the
cracks
in
terms
of
being
able
to
isolate
anyways.
N
I
there's
a
lot
of
lessons
learned
there
that
might
not
come
to
the
forefront
on
our
regular
conversations,
and
so
I
would
just
ask
you
to
please
look
through
that
report.
Look
at
some
of
these
some
of
this
information
that
our
our
our
grassroot
organizations
are
gathering
and
that
reflect
the
the
you
know
as
true
needs
as
true
as
can
get,
because
I
believe
that
you
know
their
grassroots
and
really
working
hand
in
hand
with
our
community
get
their
feedback
on
this.
N
M
Right,
can
I
just
for
clarity:
ben
is
reminding
me
we
are
doing
an
update
on
the
the
biden
1.9
trillion
dollar
stimulus
bill
next
week,
and
then
part
of
that
is
25
billion
for
child
care
providers.
An
additional
15
billion
for
block
grant.
So
we'll
go
over
all
the
details
next
week
as
part
of
3.1
of
what's
in
that
1.9
trillion
dollar
package
and
how
congress
is
thinking
of
kind
of
dispersing
up
those
negotiations.
N
Great
well,
thank
you.
Thank
you
so
much.
I
know
that
there's
also.
I
know
that
that
sarita
from
aki
was
also
reaching
out
to
my
office
for
contacts
to
the
asian
community
in
my
district.
So
I
know
that
that
you
know
we
haven't
spoken
much
about
east
asian
community.
No,
we've
brought
up
as
a
vietnamese
community,
but
I
think
that
there
that's
another
group
that
that
we
also
need
to
keep
an
eye
on
thanks
lee
thanks
for
the
feedback
for
for
the
follow-up,
thanks.
A
All
right
cancer,
crosstalk.
O
I
actually
I
just
had
one
question
lee
in
the
in
the
in
your
statement.
Regarding
I'm
sorry,
I'm
trying
to
open
up
my
document.
O
Regarding
the
vaccine,
access
outreach
and
prioritization
advocacy,
is
there
a
reason
why
we
didn't
mention
our
partnerships
with
the
private
industries,
the
the
private
partners?
O
You
know
what
was
alarming
to
me
that
I,
what
I
learned
over
the
weekend
in
in
the
meeting
with
the
with
dr
no
matter
how
much
I
try
to
pronounce
his
name,
dr
marty,
you
know,
and
and
dr
smith.
O
It
was
alarming
to
learn
that
kaiser
ensures
40
of
all
californians
throughout
the
entire
state
of
california.
I
mean
I,
I
think
we
need
to
let
that
sink
in
40
of
all
californians
and
the
state
of
california
has
only
allocated
32,
000
doses
to
kaiser,
so
just
do
the
math.
O
So
if
they
insure
40
and
they've
only
allocated
32,
000
doses
they're,
you
know,
raul
is
really
good
at
doing
math,
so
he
doesn't
even
need
a
pencil
and
paper,
I'm
sure
to
do
the
math.
That's
just
a
drop
in
the
bucket
of
what
they
need
to
to
to
vaccinate
their
members,
which
means
that
their
members
end
up
will
end
up
having
to
to
use
other
systems
to
get
vaccinated.
O
And
that
means
that
that
it
will
begin
to
put
a
burden
on
other
systems
like
the
public
health
care
system,
which
should
not
be
burdened
and
should
be
used
only
for
those
who
are
not
insured
or
who
totally
rely
on
the
public
health
care
system.
And
so
could
this
be
the
document
that
we
use
to
guide
us
in
furthering
and
strengthening
our
relationship
with
our
private
entities.
O
Those
private
partnerships,
given
that
we
use
kaiser
as
a
as
a
as
a
major
partner
to
ensure
our
own
mem,
our
own
staff
city
employees,
our
own
staffers.
M
M
You
know
typically
focused
on
the
federal
and
state
government,
so
I
think,
when
we're
advocating
for
access
to
the
vaccine,
it's
not
specifically
for
just
our
county,
getting
those
doses
or
like
the
county
of
santa
clara,
it
is
kaiser
or
stanford
or
the
other
providers
in
the
area
receiving
those
vaccines.
So
I
think
we're
still
advocating
for
those
partners
to
get
access
to
the
vaccine,
because
those
are
the
numbers
we
would
need.
M
I
think,
next
week
as
part
of
3.1,
the
igr
team
has
has
been
helping
the
vaccine
team
or
the
vaccination
team
and
and
how
we're
going
to
go
about
this
and
we're
really
kind
of
thinking
of
three
levels.
You
know
you
know
alex
has
been
leading
a
team.
That's
been
working
with
the
counties
in
our
governmental
relations
team
to
make
sure
we're
aligned,
because
at
the
federal
level,
we're
really
going
to
be
focusing
on
advocacy
and
funding
needs
at
the
state
level.
M
It's
going
to
be
the
very
same
thing:
it's
going
to
be
advocacy
and
funding
needs
and
then,
at
a
more
local
level,
with
the
county
being
the
kind
of
public
health
official.
It's
going
to
be,
what
advocacy
help
do
they
need,
and
then,
where
are?
Where
are
those
gaps?
Are
the
partners
not
performing
well
and
we
need
to
step
in
and
help
do
we
need
to
step
in
and
ensure
some
of
the
clinics
or
some
of
our
own
sites
become
vaccination
sites?
M
So
I
think
that
conversation
as
we
start
to
get
more
access
to
doses
of
vaccinations
will
evolve,
but
I
think,
as
part
of
the
legislative
guiding
document,
I
think
the
values-based
statement
of
we
just
need
access.
It's
not
specific
to
just
the
county.
It
is
all
of
our
partners
as
well.
O
Oh
okay,
so
that
that's
fine,
then
then
I'm
going
to
leave!
O
I
just
I
want
to
leave
that
little
thorn
for
all
of
us
to
to
keep
it
right
on
our
side
or
or
sit
on
it,
and
and
have
it
really
fester,
because
it's
gonna
have
a
domino
effect
on
everything
that
we
do
if,
if,
if,
if,
if
a
partner-
and
I'm
gonna
continue
to
call
them
partners,
but
if
a
partner
like
kaiser
ensures
40
of
californians
californians
doesn't
get
their
dose
and
we
don't
put
that
kind
of
pressure
on
on
on
the
governor's
administration
to
figure
out
their
numbers
and-
and
I
don't
think
it
takes
a
mathematician
like
like
council
member
perales,
to
figure
out
those
numbers.
O
I
mean,
I
think,
they're
really
simple-
to
figure
out
that
they're,
not
they're,
not
they're,
not
doing
somebody
really
messed
up
and
didn't
didn't
allocate
what
they
were
supposed
to
allocate.
But
then
what
that
means
is
that
those
of
all
of
you
who
are
figuring
out
those
sites
on
how
to
expand
these
distribution
sites
for
our
non-profits,
for
our
community
care
clinics,
for
the
county,
et
cetera,
et
cetera.
O
Then
that
just
means
we're
doing
double
time,
because
there
is
such
a
gap
of
of
doses
that
are
missing
whether
it's
regional
kaiser
and
really,
what
sticks
out
to
me
is
kaiser
kaiser,
kaiser
kaiser,
and
I
don't
think
it's
kaiser
that
doesn't
want
to
do
it.
Kaiser
just
doesn't
have
the
allocation
that
is,
is
supposed
to
be
coming
to
them
and
again
because
kaiser
is
is
one
of
our
partners.
O
We
use
them
they're,
insuring
our
our
city
staff,
it
just
it's
gonna
have
a
major
domino
effect
and
again
when,
when
we
keep
saying
we're
all
in
this
together
boy
we're
we're
integrated
in
just
so
many
ways.
This
just
shows
you
yet
another
another
tentacle
that
goes
that
stretches
out
far
and
wide
and
deep
that
suddenly
impacts
every
single,
every
single
one
of
us
and
if
you're,
a
kaiser
member
guess
what
you
may
not
get.
When
it's
your
turn,
you
may
not
get.
O
You
may
not
get
an
appointment,
not
because
it's
not
your
turn,
but
because
they
don't
have
doses,
they
don't
have
the
allocation
and
then
you're
going
to
be
looking
for
it
somewhere
else.
I'm
just
very
concerned
about
this,
and
and
it's
and
we
just
really-
I
just
want
that
thorn
to
be
stuck
in
everybody's
side
right
now
and
make
sure
that
that
we
get
our
partners
the
allocations
that
that
they
need,
as
well
as
the
public
health
care
system.
So,
okay,
so
we'll
leave
it
at
that
and
we'll.
A
And
I
just
received
noticed
lee
that
the
legislation
I
was
referring
to
or
the
program
that
might
be
potentially
included
in
a
relief
bill.
It's
already
identified
it
as
a
potential
priority
in
our
legislative
program.
Is
that
right.
B
B
A
Right:
okay,
we're
now
on
to
item
five
point,
one,
which
is
the
awarded
construction
contract
for
the
monterey
road
resurfacing
project.
There
is
no
report,
I
believe.
Is
there
john?
There
is
not
okay
move
approval.
I
A
We'll
take
public
comment
on
this
resurfacing
project.
I
see
no
public
comment
so
we'll
come
back
to
the
council.
Thank
you
for
paving
our
roads
to
you
and
your
team.
John
councilman
cohen,.
B
Just
a
quick
question
for
you:
I
apologize.
I
wasn't
able
to
get
this
answered
ahead
of
time.
This
is
the
awarding
of
a
construction
contract
that
I
see
a
fine
item,
and
I
know
this
will
probably
be
on
all
of
these
contracts
in
the
future,
and
so
I
won't
have
to
ask
it
again
the
line
item
on
the
cost
summary
programmatic
project
delivery
estimate.
B
If
that
can
you
just
explain
what
goes
into
that
number
yeah,
that's
the
staff
cost
to
prepare
the
project
both
for
the
bid
and
for
assessments
prior
to
us,
putting
the
bid
specifications
together.
We
actually
go
out
to
the
site
and
actually
do
the
assessment,
and
then
it's
also
the
cost
for.
H
A
Yes,
but
we'll
take
yours
as
a
third
okay,
let's
vote.
N
A
All
right
item
6.1
is
the
amendment
to
the
master
consultant
agreement
with
kennedy:
yanks
consultants
for
engineering
services
on
the
filter,
rehabilitation
project
at
the
regional
wastewater
facility.
There's
no
presentation
on
this
item
we'll
go
first
to
public
comment.
See
if
there's
any
public
comment
on
this
master
consultant
agreement,
I
see
no
hands
so
we're
gonna
go
back
to
council.
A
A
A
We
are
going
to
go
first
to
public
comment
to
see
if
there
are
any
public
comments
on
this
item.
The
construction
contingency
increase
for
cogen
facility
at
the
wastewater,
the
regional
wastewater
facility.
There
is
nobody
raising
their
hand,
so
we're
going
to
come
back
to
council.
Is
there
a
motion.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
item
8.2.
It's
the
objections
to
the
2122
hazardous
vegetation,
commencement
report
directing
the
removal
of
reeds
weeds
or
refuse.
A
All
right
8.3
is
the
adoption
of
the
2021
covet
residential
eviction,
moratorium
for
tennis,
financially
impacted
by
covet
19..
There
is
a
presentation.
C
Just
give
me
a
moment:
you
can
go
ahead
and
get
started
great
good
afternoon
good
evening,
not
afternoon.
Now
mayor
and
council
members.
My
name
is
jackie
morales-ferrand.
I
am
the
director
of
the
housing
department.
C
I
also
have
rachel
van
der
veen
who's,
the
deputy
director,
in
addition
to
deputy
city
attorney
chris
alexander
last
september,
the
state
passed
ab3088
that
limited
evictions
through
january
31st,
2021
so
long
as
tenants
were
able
to
pay
25
of
their
rent
through
this
time
period.
On
february
1st,
without
additional
state
or
federal
action,
tenants
will
be
required
to
pay
the
full
amount
of
monthly
rent
due
or
potentially
face
eviction,
while
state
action
isn't
anticipated.
C
The
following
summarizes
current
and
proposed
federal
state
and
local
eviction
moratoriums
the
federal
cdc
eviction
moratorium
temporarily
halted
evictions
for
non-payment
of
rent
through
september
4th
between
september
4th
2020.
Through
january
31st
2021,
president
biden
directed
federal
agencies
to
extend
their
eviction
moratoriums
through
at
least
march
31st.
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
The
state
is
also
moving
forward
as
quickly
as
possible
to
deploy
california's
share
of
the
latest
federal
stimulus
bill.
The
state
rental
assistance
program,
prioritizes
households
that
earn
below
50
percent
of
the
ami
and
communities
who
are
disproportionately
impacted
by
covid19
proposed
eligible
uses
include
paying
up
to
80
percent
of
unpaid,
rent
and
utilities.
C
C
Next
slide,
since
state
law
is
still
pending,
staff
is
proposing
enacting
a
temporary
moratorium
on
no
cause
evictions
and
evictions
due
to
non-payment
of
rent
for
residential
tenants
and
mobile
home
owners,
who
have
been
financially
impacted
by
covid19.
In
addition,
they
would
include
a
one-year
repayment
period
for
any
rent
debt
accrued
during
the
moratorium.
C
A
A
E
All
right
cool,
what
I
want
to
talk
about
is
the
the
possibility
of
an
extension
of
one
year
on
the
moratorium,
and
we
visit
the
issue
in
june
because
we,
the
people,
need
some
breathing
room.
We're
going
to
have
this
pandemic
issue
is
not
going
to
go
away
anytime
soon.
I
personally
project
at
least
five
years
before
we
even
start
looking
at
something
that
resembles
economic
recovery.
E
Then
you
have
the
psychological
recovery
and
the
social
recovery.
So
there's
three
components
to
this:
there's
the
psychological,
the
economic
and
the
social,
and
so
with
that
said,
we
need
some
breathing
room.
You
know
I
was
homeless
recently
and
it
was
it
just.
I
was
homeless.
E
I
was
in
a
couple
of
the
shelters
in
a
tent,
a
couple
of
nights
and
the
challenges
that
I
was
faced
with
in
my
own
city,
in
a
city
that
I
literally
advocate
for-
and
I
give
my
life
literally
dedicate
my
life
to
to
be
in
that
kind
of
economic
position
was
just
it
was
mind-boggling.
It
was
very
confusing
to
me.
You
know
this
is
a
soil
that
my
ancestors
toiled
and
they
didn't
deal
with.
E
All
of
those
conditions
you
know
in
the
history
of
the
city,
just
so
that
I
could
be
living
under
those
kinds
of
conditions,
because
poverty
is
created.
Let's,
let's
not
mince
here,
poverty
is
being
created
right
now,
okay,
it's
being
generated
by
the
gentrification
by
these.
This
is
the
most
expensive
real
estate
in
the
world.
E
A
A
Neil
we're
not
able
to
hear
you
right
now.
Maybe
your
device.
A
And
you
know
we're
still
not
able
to
hear
you
if
you're
trying
to
talk
right
now,
I
knew
when
we
come
back
to
you
appears
to
be
an
issue
with
the
device.
We'll
come
back
to
you
at
the
end
of
this.
This
next
group,
the
first
one,
the
phone
number
ending
4963.
F
F
F
F
We've
already
had
one
park
owner
sent
out
an
email
today
saying
that
that
is
what
she
is
going
to
advise
her
owners.
This
means
that
park
residents
can
face
huge
increases
beyond
the
normal
3
percent,
and
the
city
of
san
jose
is
without
legal
authority
to
block
those
increases.
This
is
really
critical.
If
a
park
owner
gets
an
increase
of,
let's
say,
60
dollars
a
month,
the
city
of
san
jose
is
not
able
to
block
those
increases.
F
Additionally,
the
residents
are
going
to
have
to
come
up
with
at
least
twenty
thousand
dollars
to
defend
themselves
against
a
petition
for
fair
return.
They
must
hire
an
attorney.
They
must
hire
expert
witnesses.
I
can
tell
you
that
we've
had
two
in
my
park.
Back
to
back
the
second
year,
we
were
unable
to
raise
the
funds
to
hire
an
attorney,
so
I
had
to
represent
the
folks
in
my
park
against
a
park
attorney
is
it
is
stressful.
F
This
case
went
on
for
over
four
years
the
residents
were
waiting
to
find
out
what
kind
of
rent
increase
they
were
going
to
suffer.
So
please,
with
all
due
respect
to
council
person,
maya
esparza,
please
do
not
ex
do
not
vote
on
a
rent
freeze
for
mobile
home
residents
in
total,
but
a
targeted
rent
increase
that
would
be
given
to
those
who
are
who
have
been
impacted
by
coving.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
P
Reed
good
evening,
matthew,
reed
silicon
valley
at
home,
we're
here
tonight
to
strongly
support
staff's
recommendation
to
extend
the
city's
eviction
moratorium
in
the
face
of
the
lack
of
timely
action
in
sacramento
as
an
aside,
not
to
put
too
fine
a
point
on
it,
but
our
state
leadership
can
and
should
do
better
than
wait
to
the
last
moment
to
address
the
human
cost
of
the
uncertainty
of
these
times,
and
we
shouldn't
shouldn't
have
to
do
this.
But
I
appreciate
your
leadership.
P
We
also
support
the
leadership
of
council
member
esparza
and
asking
for
housing
to
come
back
with
an
extension.
The
moratorium
on
rent
increases
and
are
confident
that
the
department
will
be
able
to
address
the
concerns
raised
by
council
member
foley
as
you're
all
well
aware,
policies
only
matter
when
they
are
effectively
implemented
to
ensure
that
promised
rights
are
enjoyed
and
responsibilities
are
respected.
P
Things
things
are
not
well,
we
believe
many
continue
not
to
understand
or
respect
the
current
rules
and
and
we're
headed
now
into
a
a
period
of
unfortunately
additional
uncertainty
as
we
extend
rules
and
we
have
cities
and
counties
and
the
state
and
the
federal
government
again
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
protect
people.
This
leads
to
a
tremendous
amount
of
uncertainty
and
and
destabilizes
the
system,
and
it
hurts
people.
As
you
know,
this
is
also
not
getting
simpler.
P
P
Q
Jacinski
hi.
Thank
you
mayor.
My
name
is
ryan
jaczynski
and
I
represent
the
mobile
home
park
owners
on
the
housing
and
community
development
commission.
Although
I'm
not
speaking
in
the
status
of
hcdc
tonight,
I
want
to
thank
martha
o'connell
for
working
with
me
throughout
the
weekend.
I
also
want
to
thank
council
member
foley
for
her
time
and
for
submitting
the
memo
as
well.
Q
We
came
together
this
weekend
in
a
collaborative
collaborative
effort
to
protect
those
that
are
most
vulnerable.
Our
intention
is
to
take
a
more
targeted
approach,
offering
support
in
the
way
of
a
rent
increase
freeze
for
those
that
have
demonstrated
they
have
been
financially
impacted
by
cobit
19..
Q
Q
Then
we
received
another
invite
from
housing
department
on
monday
at
8,
30
pm
for
an
impromptu
meeting,
with
homeowners,
mobile
home
owners
and
residents
for
a
meeting
the
next
day
today
at
4
pm,
which
conflicted
with
the
city
council
meeting.
On
a
bright
note,
there
was
unanimous
support
for
the
foley
memo.
Q
I
want
to
highlight
that
this
short
notice
makes
it
difficult
for
us
to
do
the
background
work
that
is
necessary
to
have
meaningful
conversation
regarding
these
topics.
This
challenge
impacts
all
parties
involved,
as
everyone
has
other
responsibilities,
both
personally
and
professionally
in
the
future.
It
would
be
beneficial
for
everyone
to
have
more
advance
notice
to
work
independently,
then
collaboratively
to
find
reasonable
solutions
for
agenda
items
of
this
nature.
Q
Again,
we
are
hopeful.
The
the
foley
proposal
that
was
presented
will
be
adopted
as
there's
been
support
from
the
public
in
the
meeting
today
and
through
letters
submitted
in
the
public
comment
tonight.
We
believe
this
proposal
continues
to
meet
the
objective
of
supporting
the
most
in
need.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
doug
johnson,.
E
Good
evening,
mr
mayor
and
council
members,
this
is
doug.
G
R
Good
evening,
honorable
mayor
licardo
and
council
members,
tim
bobian,
representing
the
santa
clara
county
association
of
realtors
and
our
6
000
members
score
supports
the
memorandum
authored
by
council
member
foley
on
this
issue.
We
understand
the
need
and
reasoning
to
extend
eviction
moratoriums
as
the
covid
pandemic
continues
and
worsens.
R
We
do
not
wish
to
see
anybody
pushed
into
homelessness
during
this
public
health
crisis
and
understands
the
importance
of
maintaining
a
safe
shelter
during
these
times
score
thanks
city
staff,
for
clarifying
that
this
moratorium
only
serves
as
a
stop
gap
until
final
state
legislation
is
passed
and
will
supersede
this
urgency
ordinance.
We
wish
to
limit
the
confusion
and
unnecessary
administrative
burdens
of
competing
ordinances
that
makes
it
difficult
for
tenants
and
housing
providers
alike
to
understand
and
comply
with
score
urges
the
city
to
continue
to
advocate
the
state
and
federal
government
for
further
rental
assistance.
R
As
unpaid
back
rent
rapidly
increases
debts
are
growing
to
amounts,
the
tenants
will
be
unable
to
pay
leaving
housing
providers
struggling
to
pay
mortgage
utilities,
maintenance,
repairs
and
their
daily
living
expenses,
as
mortgage
forbearance
may
near
an
end.
Balloon
back
payments
could
near
a
foreclosure
clip.
This
would
result
in
countless
unintended
evictions
of
vulnerable
tenants
and
the
depletion
of
much
needed,
naturally
affordable
housing
in
the
city
of
san
jose.
R
It
is
also
crucial,
as
rental
assistance
is
made
available
from
the
recent
federal
funding
that
housing
providers
are
allowed
to
apply
for
these
funds
themselves,
to
streamline
the
process
and
limit
the
burden
on
tenants
to
receive
this
assistance
quickly.
Previous
procedural
hurdles
made
it
difficult
for
tenants
and
housing
providers
truly
in
need
of
these
funds
to
absolve
unpaid
rent
burdens
and
acquire
the
necessary
assistance
once
again,
score
encourages
council
to
improve,
approve
council
member
foley's
memo
and
consider
these
recommendations
to
further
assist
our
cities,
vulnerable,
tenants
and
housing
providers.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
B
Oh,
I'm
sorry.
Can
you
hear
me
now
yeah,
we
can.
Thank
you
great.
Thank
you.
Glenna
halcroft,
gsmol
super
chapter,
president
mayor
licardo
and
council
members.
Please
support
the
jaczynski
o'connell
proposal
on
item
8.3.
Otherwise
one
the
park
owners
will
unleash
a
deluge
of
petitions
for
fair
return.
B
B
Four,
the
increases
granted
by
a
hearing
officer
could
be
much
larger
than
the
annual
raise
allowed
by
the
city
plus
that
raise
would
be
in
addition
to
the
annual
raise
this
would
decimate
the
mobile
home
community.
That
is
why
I
call
upon
mayor
le
cardo
and
the
city
council
to
accept
the
jaczynski
o'connell
compromise.
A
You
roberta
mora.
I
Thank
you,
mayor
licardo,
I'm
roberta
moore,
a
29-year
resident
of
san
jose
and
a
four
plex
owner.
Please
support
pam
flowely's
memo
for
mobile
homes
and
adopt
it
for
apartments.
This
memo
is
based
on
a
collaboration
between
owners
and
renters
to
identify
what
is
best
for
all
of
the
people
affected.
I
I
This
proposal
is
designed
to
be
fair
and
equitable
for
all
parties,
while
still
protecting
the
vulnerable
people.
The
majority
of
owners,
including
me,
want
to
do
what's
right
and
help
people.
We
don't
want
people
on
the
streets.
This
is
the
best
way
to
help
people
are
most
in
need
without
causing
unnecessary
burden
on
housing
providers.
My
request
is:
council,
adopts
this
proposal
for
apartments
as
well.
Thank
you.
R
R
I
also
want
to
thank
ryan
and
martha
for
really
bringing
the
troops
on
both
sides
representing
the
mobile
home
owners
and
also
the
park
owners,
and
I
attended
the
meeting
today
to
discuss
this
and
there
was
unanimous
support
for
both
from
both
the
homeowners
and
the
park
owners
in
support
of
council
member
foley's
memorandum.
R
We
believe
in
helping
those
residents
in
need
just
a
little
stats
from
my
side
of
our
parks
is,
we
are
99
and
a
half
percent
collected.
We
have
worked
with
multiple
residents
where
we
entered
into
payment
plan
agreements
and
we
are
here
to
help
those
who
need
and
this
the
memorandum
that's
been
proposed.
Does
that?
And
so
I
I
asked
the
council:
what
are
we
trying
trying
to
solve
for?
R
I
believe
we're
trying
to
solve
for
those
who
need
help,
and
so
I
think
we
need
to
look
closely
and
be
sure.
We
support
council
member
foley's
memorandum
because
that's
what
that
does
as
opposed
to
you
know,
looking
at
that
at
the
proposed
other
memorandum,
which
I
believe
has
some
other
unintended
consequences
which
residents
have
brought
up
as
concerns.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
L
Thank
you
mayor.
I
want
to
give
talk
about
this
topic
for
a
little
bit
and
then
to
give
some
context,
then
talk
a
little
bit
about
how
we
got
here
and
and
what
what
is
happening
tonight
so
first
I
on
the
moratorium.
I
wanted
to
thank
staff
for
bringing
this
item
back
to
us.
It's
clear
that
our
residents
in
san
jose
are
continuing
to
face
the
worst
of
this
crisis
and
this
pandemic,
including
the
risk
of
heading
over
the
eviction
cliff
and
again.
L
L
This
debt
is
hanging
over
them
and
a
recent
study
found
that
49
of
tenants
have
borrowed
money
from
friends
or
family
to
make
rent
29
have
taken
on
credit
card
debt
and
26
percent
have
been
selling
assets
to
raise
rent
money,
san
jose
mirrors
the
state's
renters,
and
that
we
are
a
city
45
renter,
as
is
california,
that's
nearly
half
of
our
residents
are
renters,
and
so
I
wanted
to
thank
the
moratorium.
I
think
extending
that
is
is
critical.
L
I
you
know,
I
think,
we've
all
heard
from
residents.
I've
had
moms,
you
know
call
or
come
up
to
me
out
in
the
community
tearful,
because
this
is
weighing
on
them
every
single
day.
You
know
they're
trying
to
pay
what
they
can,
selling
whatever
they
can
to
make
some
money.
But
it's
this
is
crushing
debt
for
folks
in
our
community.
L
L
Is
we
like
san
francisco
and
la
are
fortunate
enough
to
have
a
very
robust
network
of
70
equity
providers
out
in
our
community
providing
rental
assistance,
and
so,
while
we're
talking
about
all
the
rents
for
protections,
I
just
wanted
to
put
that
out
there
that,
as
these
discussions
take
place,
I
know
the
mayor
is
very
active
in
the
big
city
mayors
advocating
for
san
jose.
I
know
our
housing
department
talks
to
a
lot
of
their
counterparts
at
the
state
level.
L
My
hope
is
that
we
can
continue
this
robust
network,
because
I
think
it's
been
acknowledged
by
a
lot
of
folks
throughout
the
state
that
it
may
be
very,
very
difficult
for
people
to
access
that
help,
and
so
we
will.
We
would
leave
huge
parts
of
our
community
out
of
that
assistance.
So
I
wanted
to
put
that
out
there.
L
I
also
wanted
to
so
I
wanted
to
get
back
to
to
tonight,
so
we
allowed
the
rent,
increased
moratorium
to
expire
right
and
and-
and
I
I
take
some
responsibility
for
that,
because
I
talked
when
we
talked
about
sick
leave
in
december.
I
actually
brought
up
that.
I
have
residents
who
have
received
rent
increase
notices
in
december
that
has
continued
and-
and
I
think
that's
also
something
that
a
lot
of
folks
may
not
understand
is
not
everybody
most.
You
know
most
people
play
by
the
rules.
L
Thankfully
you
heard
from
people
tonight
who
play
by
the
rules,
not
everybody
plays
by
the
rules
throughout
this
entire
pandemic.
I
have
heard
from
folks
who
have
gotten
eviction
notices
during
the
pandemic
and
eviction
notices
for
not
paying
rent
when
they
couldn't
pay,
rent
and
they're
supposed
to
be
protections.
So
we
allowed
this
to
expire
and
I
have
received
so
many
calls
from
district
7
residents,
and
I
know
it's
not
just
district
7..
L
These
are
folks
who
live
in
apartments
market
rate
which,
by
the
way,
only
30
of
apartments
in
san
jose
are
actually
owned
by
san
jose
based
companies.
Most
of
these
landlords
are
not
mom
and
pop.
Some
of
the
rent
increase
notices
have
been
given
by
affordable
housing
developers,
our
affordable
housing
units,
as
well
as
market
rate
landlords.
So
it's
been
happening
and
and
again
we
allow
this
to
expire,
and
so
people
are
getting
these
notices
and
they're
dealing
with
crushing
debt.
So
it's
not
nothing.
L
It
is
happening
out
there
in
the
community
and
that's
what
the
memo
that
I
submitted
on
friday
was
in
response
to
was
a
response
to
calls
from
tearful
residents
about
this
debt
that
they
just
don't
think
they're
ever
going
to
get
out
from
under,
and
so
that
brings
us
to
how
we
got
here
and
what
is
here
so
so.
L
I
understand
that
this
is
technically
a
separate
but
very
closely
related
issue,
so
for
folks
that
are
listening,
we're
very
limited
in
what
we
can
say
and
do
tonight,
because
it
is
related,
but
it
is
not
agendized
and
by
the
way,
my
office
was
also
part
of
these
weekend.
Conversations
to
make
that
clear
to
folks
that
we
tonight
would
not
be
making
a
decision
on
this.
L
It
is
not
agendized
as
such,
and
so
so
I
wanted
to
ask
jackie
if
you
could
explain
sort
of
what
here
is
why
it's
in
the
memo,
the
way
it
is
and
and
what
could
happen
as
far
as
the
freeze
extension.
C
Sure
so
I
believe
you
know,
the
housing
department
did
indicate
in
our
memo
that
the
rent
freeze
had
expired
and
we
would
need
direction
from
the
council
on
how
to
proceed,
and
I
appreciate
council
member
your
statement
that
you
feel
like
feel
some
responsibility
that
I
feel
from
the
housing
department,
a
responsibility
that
we
did
not
clearly
flag.
This
issue
to
the
council.
C
So
frankly,
I
appreciate
you
in
your
office
for
sending
me
an
email
asking
me
about
when
the
this
particular
moratorium
expired,
and
so
we
can't
move
on
it
now,
because
we
don't
have
a
recommendation
on
our
memo.
C
But
it
is
a
city.
It
is
the
administration's
intent
to
move
forward
with
a
memo
and
bring
it
to
rules
for
the
council
to
consider.
L
Thank
you
thank
you,
and
so
I
I
wanted
to
so.
Hopefully
that
clarifies
things
I
think.
There's
there
have
been
a
lot
of
there's
been
a
lot
of
misunderstanding
about
what
is
happening
tonight
tonight.
We
are
voting
on
an
eviction
moratorium
and
that's
that's
the
vote
and,
however
we
can.
We
can
ask
the
housing
department
to
come
back,
and
so
I
wanted
to
also
thank
all
of
the
mobile
home
park
advocates
who
did
work
together
over
the
weekend
and
today
to
have
those
conversations
I
wanted
to
thank
council
member
foley.
L
Thank
you
for
being
part
of
the
solution
and
I
wanted
to
and
also
I
know
that
staff,
because
I
I
know
that
staff
will
work
with
the
stakeholders
in
terms
of
developing
a
proposal
for
the
city
council's
consideration
on
the
rent
freeze.
But
that
is
not
what
we're
voting
on
tonight
and
I
believe
I
can't
that
can't
be
included
in
the
motion.
Is
that
correct,
nora
we've
simply
stated
our
our
desire,
but
it
cannot
be
part
of
motion.
Is
that
correct.
L
Okay,
thank
you
and
so,
and
so
I
I
would
add,
I'm
sure
councilmember
foley
will
will
add
to
that.
I
I
wanted
to
to
again
thank
her
and
thank
all
of
the
partners
tonight
again
for
partnership.
I
think
you
know
that's
collaboration
and
partnership
and
communication,
I
think,
is
one
of
the
themes
that
has
emerged
today.
L
I
do
want
to
say
that
my
my
desire
at
this
point,
because
it's
not
part
of
we
can't
make
a
motion,
but
my
desire
would
be
to
review
and
analyze
the
recommendations
by
the
letters
submitted
by
martha
mcconnell
again.
We
can't
make
that
part
of
the
motion,
but
I'd
like
to
thank
council
member
foley
for
codifying
that
letter.
I
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
work,
a
lot
of
work
and
a
lot
of
changes
in
terms
of
rental
assistance
and
rent
forgiveness,
as
we
heard
earlier
about
what's
happening
at
the
state.
L
But
I
I
I
feel
like
there's
sort
of
these
two
really
important
groups
that
we
all
love
and
all
want
to
protect
and
that's
our
mobile
home
homeowners
and
who
are
also
tenants
right
who
rent
spaces
and
then
all
of
the
tenants
in
san
jose
and
who,
especially
at
the
low
income
level,
who
are
dealing
with
some
really
crushing
crushing
economic
despair
right
now.
So
so
that
I
just
wanted
to
put
that
out
there
that
that
was.
That
would
be.
L
My
preference
is
for
the
housing
department
to
review
review
the
the
letter
and
the
request
that
martha
in
the
letter
that
martha
o'connell
and
ryan
josinski
the
joint
letter
that
they
submitted
so
that
we
can
start
figuring
out
a
path.
I
don't
want
to
sort
of
commit
to
anything
at
this
point
because
I
think
I
think
there's
a
lot
to
consider
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
take
that
time
to
really
assess.
L
What's
going
to
work,
what's
going
to
work
for
all
everyone
in
our
community,
and
so
with
that
I'll
make
the
motion
to
accept
staff's
recommendations
regarding
the
adoption
of
the
2021
covid
residential
eviction,
moratorium
for
tenants
financially
impacted
by
covet.
That's
the
motion.
A
Is
there
a
second
second?
Okay,
I
think
I
heard
the
vice
mayor,
okay,
council,
member,
fully.
S
L
So
so,
as
I'm
correct,
as
as
because
we
are
not
allowed
to
make
a
motion
on
the
rent
briefs.
S
Okay,
okay!
Well,
then,
could
we
include
well
let
before
I
go
on
what
what
I'd
like
to
see
us
include
if
it's
possible
is
first
a
statement.
We
are
here,
as
a
few
have
said,
and
those
members
of
the
public
have
said
it,
because
the
state
legislature
has
not
taken
action
yet
and
in
this
11th
hour
they
seem
to
be
finally
reaching
an
agreement
on
the
eviction
moratorium,
which
does
include
assistance
for
landlords,
financial
assistance
which
will
pay
them.
This
is
the
proposal
anyway.
S
If
it
gets
passed
this
way
it,
it
will
benefit
a
lot
of
people
that
if
the
state
will
pay
the
landlord
80
of
the
unpaid
rent,
if
the
landlord
forgives
20
of
the
rent,
that
really
makes
good
business
business
sense.
On
my
part,
no
one
on
this
dios
and
nobody
calling
in
today
wants
to
see
any
more
deus.
That's
not
really
it
it's
a
zoom
call.
S
S
We
truly
do
not
want
to
increase
any
put
anybody
out
on
the
street
due
to
homelessness
due
to
unpaid,
rent
or
unpaid
mortgages.
For
that
point,
so
the
federal
government
is
working
on
that
the
state
government
is
working
on
the
landlord
tenants,
which
is
great.
I
wish
we
weren't
here
now
having
to
make
this
decision.
S
I
support
staff's
recommendation
truthfully.
I
supported
my
own
recommendation
too,
but
apparently
I
can't
vote
on
that
right
now
and
I
can't
push
put
it
forward,
but
I
do
want
to
thank
ryan
who
ryan,
who
represents
the
mobile
home
park
owners
and
martha,
who
represents
the
mobile
home
owners,
mobile
home
owners
and
mobile
home
park
owners
and
how
they
came
together
this
weekend.
S
Once
again,
in
an
unprecedented
way,
we
passed
a
proposal
and
ordinance
last
year
on
april
28th,
with
very
similar
language
to
this,
to
avoid
the
problems
that
the
mobile
home
owners
talked
about
today,
the
increase
in
rent,
the
ensuing
lawsuits
that
may
result
if
we
interfered
with
that
process
and
that
was
unprecedented
to
get
the
mobile
home
park
owners
together
with
the
mobile
home
owners
and
reach
an
agreement
like
that.
S
We
accomplished
that
again
or
they
accomplished
that
this
weekend
and
I
was
able
to
author
a
memo
what
I'd
like
to
see
and
I'm
wondering
if
we
can.
So
I
truly
appreciate
all
of
that.
I'm
wondering
if
in
the
motion,
if
we
can
include
direction
to
staff,
to
come
back
with
a
recommendation
on
free
rent
freezes.
L
B
To
to
do
that
and
do
what
they
need
to
do
to
get
it
on
the
agenda.
L
S
Okay,
so
that
when
it
comes
through
for
rules,
please
consider
including
a
freeze
on
rental
on
apartments
as
well,
not
just
the
the
mobile
home
parks,
we've
addressed
mobile
home
parks
and
the
exception
on
the
freeze
can
please
consider
an
exception
on
the
freeze
for
those
people
who
are
not
covered
related
to
rental
difficulties.
I
know
I'm
saying
that
in
kind
of
a
weird
way,
but
you
understand
what
I'm
trying
to
get
what
point
I'm
trying
to
make
jackie.
Okay
with
that.
S
A
D
I'm
sorry
about
that
earlier
good
evening,
mayor
and
council,
a
noble
bar
with
the
california
apartment
association.
I
want
to
echo
the
request
that
council
member
fully
made
to
add
an
exemption
for
apartments
where
they're,
who
are
not
affected
by
covet.
I
think,
while
tenants
are
facing
deep
challenges
to
from
this
pandemic,
so
too
are
landlords
just
as
a
snapshot
of
the
rental
market,
we've
seen
so
far.
D
Rents
over
the
past
year
dropped
by
10
percent
and
that's
across
the
board,
not
just
one
product
type,
we're
seeing
near
a
near
doubling
of
the
vacancy
rate
over
the
past
year,
we're
currently
10.5
percent
and
that
doesn't
even
factor
in
the
number
of
units
that
are
occupied
that
aren't
paying
rent
so
we're
having
a
bit
of
a
double
whammy
when
it
comes
to
rental
income,
that's
lost
and
that
high
vacancy
rate
is
even
that
isn't
even
at
the
peak
according
to
folks
at
costar,
who
are
forecasting
that
we're
going
to
see
is
something
as
high
as
17
vacancy
a
year
from
now.
D
I
just
want
to
kind
of
paint
this
picture
that
the
market
is
and
the
rental
industry
is
suffering.
Quite
a
bit-
and
you
know
tenants
and
landlords-
are
in
this
together-
where
we
are,
our
members-
are
working
with
their
tenants
and
trying
to
make
sure
they
find
ways
to
keep
them
housed,
but
it
doesn't
help
when,
when
you
know,
when
their
face
everyone's
facing
these
financial
hurdles,
so
I
want
to
thank
the
council
for
allowing
me
to
speak,
despite
my
technical
difficulties.
Thank
you.
A
H
Thank
you,
and
I
think
my
my
colleagues
have
said
it
well,
so
I'll
be
brief,
just
kind
of
adding
to
the
to
the
timeline
there.
H
I
believe
it
was
back
in
august
that
I
had
recommended
the
council.
We
extend
our
eviction
moratorium
to
match.
H
With
our
local
declared
state
of
emergency,
and
certainly
I
think,
as
we
see
once
again,
the
state
which
was
the
the
same
situation
back
then
it's
kind
of
late
to
act,
I'm
happy
to
you
know,
obviously
be
supporting
our
local
recommendation
that
we
have
coming
out
now,
thanks.
B
Thank
you.
I
have
a
question
for
jackie
and
rachel,
I
heard
from
a
housing
provider
who
has
concerns
about
about
some
tenants.
I
hope
it's
a
small
number,
but
some
tenants
who
may
not
be
willing
to
work
with
them
on
the
aid
application,
and
I
know
it's
it
sounds
like
it
needs
to
be
a
joint,
a
joint
effort
between
the
housing
provider
and
the
tenant,
and
there
are
some
reasons
that
they
they
might
not
want
to
do
that.
B
The
tenants
one
of
them
is
that
they
may
have
concern
concerns
about
their
immigration
status
being
revealed.
Another
is
not
wanting
to
divulge
financial
information
and
the
the
question
I
have
is:
how
is
the
housing
department,
or
are
you
messaging
this
with
tenants
and
how?
How
are
you
working
with
the
housing
providers
to
overcome
these
so
that
they
can
get
the
back
rent
that
they're
owed
through
through
the
aid
that
we're
offering.
C
Davis,
not
today
michelle's
on
the
line,
I
thought
and
maybe
she's
not.
I
don't.
C
I
Yes
councilmember:
this
is
something
that
we're
working
very
closely
with
our
nonprofit
partners
on
and
they
can
usually
work
very
carefully
with
the
tenants
to
understand
how
the
this
aid
can
help
them,
and
usually
it
has
not
been
the
tenants
that
are
the
problem.
It's
usually
the
reverse,
it's
the
landlords
that
have
concerns,
but
we've
we
are
taking
that
into
account,
especially
as
we
design
the
next
phase
of
the
program.
A
Okay,
thanks
to
council
members,
esparza
and
foley
for
pure
thoughtful
memoranda.
I
know
we'll
consider
those
in
the
days
ahead
and
I
will
certainly
support
going
forward.
I
think
those
are
all
the
comments.
Let's
vote.
L
B
H
A
All
right,
10.3,
I'm
sorry.
First
10.1
is
the
land
use,
consent
agenda,
they're,
two
items:
anyone
like
to
pull
an
item
from
land
use
consent.
All
right
is
there.
Anyone
from
the
public
would
like
to
speak
on
either
of
these
land
use
consent
items
on
10.1,
I'm
not
seeing
anybody
raise
their
hand.
Let's
come
move.
L
A
K
A
T
T
The
project
consists
of
116
assistant,
living
residential
care,
guest
rooms,
49
memory
care,
guest
rooms,
four
residential
units
for
staff
and
32
parking
spaces,
and
this
evening
the
city
council
will
be
considering
the
four
elements
of
the
project,
including
the
general
plan,
amendment
the
confirming
rezoning
the
conditional
use
permit,
as
well
as
the
tentative
map,
so
the
general
plan
land
use
change.
This
map
shows
the
side
by
side
comparison.
T
T
T
I
also
want
to
note
that
city
staff
have
received
emails
from
members
of
the
community
with
additional
questions.
Just
clarifying
the
height
considerations,
setbacks
references
to
the
2002
sni
dalmus
park,
neighborhood
improvement
plan,
as
well
as
how
the
project
was
analyzed
in
accordance
with
the
2014
deerdon
station
area
plan.
T
The
planning
commission
considered
the
project
at
its
meeting
on
december
9th
and
voted
that
the
city
council
certified
the
addendum
to
the
downtown
eir
approved
the
rezoning
adopt
the
resolution
approving
the
tentative
map,
as
well
as
approve
the
conditional
use
permit,
and
I
also
just
want
to
acknowledge
the
memorandum
submitted
by
the
mayor
and
council
members
jimenez,
I'm
sorry,
councilmember,
perales,
davis,
arenas
and
mayhem
and
with
that
staff
is
available
to
answer
any
questions
and
mayor.
I
know
that
the
applicant
team
should
be
on
the
call
for
their
presentation
as
well.
J
D
What
you
have
before
you
this
evening
is
one
of
seven
of
our
projects.
This
one
focused
on
addressing
the
deep
regional
need
to
provide
options
for
seniors
to
live
in,
and
we're
excited
that
this
can
be
located
amongst
the
rich
amenities
of
downtown
we're
grateful
to
be
working
with
adis
architects
on
the
design
of
the
project,
and
so
on
behalf
of
the
partners.
I
want
to
thank
you
for
your
consideration
for
approval
and
I'll
turn.
The
screen
over
to
urban
catalyst
director
of
development
tim
will
ocean.
J
I
was
I
had
the
screen
share
going.
Okay.
Thank
you,
mr
mayor
members
of
council.
We
are
very
excited
to
be
here
before
you
tonight
tonight.
Our
presentation
will
focus
primarily
on
the
work
that
we
have
done
with
the
community
over
the
past
year
and
a
half
well.
I
also
want
to
thank
staff.
They've
been
tremendous
to
work
with.
We
also
have
several
members
of
our
our
team
here
tonight.
In
case
questions
come
up.
Fang,
doe,
our
architect
and
jason
reyes
of
calson
management.
J
Khalsan
is
the
operating
partner
that
will
be
managing
the
community
on
behalf
of
urban
catalyst.
By
now,
you
have
some
familiarity
with
the
project
165
residential
care
units.
This
is
not
an
age
restricted
market
rate,
housing
development.
This
is
a
programmed
and
amenitized
community
for
the
elderly,
a
lot
of
amenities
living
spaces
library,
wellness
center,
a
cafe
for
residents
activity
rooms.
J
We
also
have
a
really
really
nice
dining
room
with
an
outdoor
patio.
On
the
top
floor,
where
residents
can
can
view
the
downtown
we
have
engaged
the
community
from
the
very
outset.
We
initiated
the
outreach
in
september
of
2019
and,
as
has
been
stated,
we
had
two
additional
meetings
in
2020
and
frequent
and
ongoing
communication
with
the
neighborhood
through
that
time.
J
So
I'd
like
to
focus
on
on
showing
ways
that
we
have
directly
addressed
the
community's
concerns
that
we've
gained
from
that
process.
The
biggest
thing
is
that
when
you
look
back
at
where
we
started
in
2019,
we've
reconfigured
our
project
and
and
we
reduced
the
height
in
particular,
the
neighborhood
was
concerned
about
the
85-foot
height
that
we
proposed
for
the
corner
or
that
we
had
conceptualized.
J
We
reduced
that
height
and
the
project
now
complies
at
65
feet
with
the
existing
duradon
station
area
plan
height
limits.
We
also
modified
the
architecture
along
gifford
avenue,
and
we
did
that
by
by
giving
the
appearance
of
five
stories
at
at
gifford
avenue.
You
can
see
how
we've
set
the
project
back.
There,
we've
articulated
the
architecture.
J
You
can
also
see
on
this
slide,
how
we
have
done
that
a
little
bit
more
and
we
set
back
the
southern
property
10
feet
from
the
southern
property
line.
For
the
majority
of
that
of
that
edge
condition,
we
also
heard
feedback
from
the
community
about
the
the
site
plan.
Most
importantly,
the
community
was
concerned
about
commercial
loading
for
a
project
of
this
type,
so
we
worked
very
closely
with
planning
and
public
works
and
and
and
we
moved
the
the
loading
on
to
west
san
carlo.
J
So
now
it's
located
in
this
area
here
that'll
include
garbage
commercial
loading.
There
will
be
emergency
services
for
this
type
of
a
use,
so
that
will
now
be
serviced
from
west
san
carlos
and
will
not
interfere
with
the
ongoing
day-to-day
activities
of
the
neighborhood.
J
We
also
enhanced
our
sidewalks
and
we
have
also
made
a
voluntary
car
or
we
will
make
a
voluntary
contribution
in
order
to
provide
an
upgraded
signal
or
enhanced
crosswalk
in
the
project
vicinity
along
west
san
carlos.
I
just
want
to
add
one
more
note.
Urban
catalyst
has
directly
engaged
the
community
through
this
process
and
we
view
that
experience
very
positively
in
the
early
stages.
J
There
was
some
some
concerns
expressed
about
this
project
or
certain
elements
of
the
project,
but
we
have
found
the
community
to
be
generally
supportive
of
development,
so
the
net
result
has
been
a
better
project
before
you
tonight,
one
that
works
for
everyone.
So
it's
out.
It's
allowed
us
to
create
a
much
better
relationship
with
the
community
and
and
with
that,
we
respectfully
ask
that
council
of
provided
support
for
this
project
tonight
and
move
to
approve
and
we
are
available
for
any
questions.
Thank
you.
A
E
Soto
yeah,
this
is
paul
soto
from
the
horseshoe.
I
grew
up
in
that
neighborhood.
I
grew
up
right
right
there
right
smack
where
you're
putting
your
building
and
eric
hayden
is
pretty
much
a
juggernaut
in
that
area.
He
wouldn't
care
whether
we
liked
it
or
not.
He
would
do
everything
humanly
possible
to
ensure
and
make
sure
that
that
happens
so
you're
talking
about
their
community
being,
you
know
fully
supportive
of
what's
going
on,
you
haven't
really
talked
to
the
community.
You
talk
to
the
people,
your
sycophants
is
who
you've
talked
to
you
know.
E
So
that's
number
one
number
two
is
that
there
is:
how
much
is
it
going
to
be
for
people
to
live
there?
How
do
you
define
senior
housing?
How
do
you
what
is
affordable
if
you're
going
to
use
that
affordable
term?
What
is
affordable,
define
that
be
very,
very
clear
and
specific,
because
you're
the
fact
that
the
issues
that
you
were
actually
omitting-
those
are
the
ones
that
I'm
going
to
have
the
questions
for
not
what
you're
saying
what
you're
saying
me
is
meaningless
to
me.
E
What
is
meaningful
is
what
you
are
not
saying
you
haven't
described,
how
much
it's
going
to
cost.
You
haven't
described
what
senior
means
to
you,
you
haven't
described.
How
do
you
have
a
contract
so
that
that
housing
turns
into
other
types
of
housing
after
10
15
20
years?
You
haven't
discussed
that
I'd
also
like
to
know
what
what's
the
other
issue,
let
me
see:
oh
it
was
an
opportunity
zone
was
an
opportunity.
Zoning
used
in
order
to
get
into
that
area.
E
The
development
that
went
up
on
that's
going
to
go
up
on
the
corner
of
7th
in
virginia
that
one
was
initially
slated
for
senior
housing,
oh
of
course,
who
morally
would
object
to
any
senior
housing
going
in,
that's
how
they
slide
it
in
and
then
afterwards
all
then
afterwards,
once
it
gets
approved,
then
all
of
a
sudden
it
becomes
other
types
of
housing.
So
there's
a
lot
of
sneaky
shenanigans
going
on
in
my
city,
and
I
I
don't
know,
I
don't
approve
of
it
and
I
don't
like
it.
A
Thank
you
kathy
sutherland,
welcome,
kathy.
B
Good
morning
not
good
morning,
good
evening,
mayor
and
council,
my
name
is
kathy
sutherland
and
I'm
a
resident
and
past
president
of
the
of
denmas
park
and
a
member
of
the
dearden
area,
neighborhood
group,
and
we
call
ourselves
the
day,
I'm
hoping
that
you've
all
seen
our
letters
and
I'd
like
to
thank
kelly
klein
on
the
mayor's
staff.
For
our
frank
conversation
in
what
she
rightfully
pointed
out,
that
the
letters
sent
in
were
confusing
and
really
had
little
to
do
with
the
project,
she
was
right.
B
They
were
actually
directed
to
planning
staff
on
the
process
and
we
hope
that
council,
member
perales
will
just
give
a
little
bit
of
time
to
clarify
the
exact
use
for
this
site.
It's
called
the
residential
care
facility
or
a
senior
living
facility,
and
those
are
those
have
different
definitions.
B
This
project
is
moving
forward
at
the
same
time
as
neighborhood
leaders
are
deeply
concerned
with
the
derivative
station
area
plan
amendment
process.
While
we
understand
that
this
project
meets
the
current
criteria
and
should
be
approved,
we
are
also
keenly
aware
that
it
will
not
meet
the
standards
in
five
months.
Normally
this
wouldn't
be
a
problem.
We're
all
expert
jugglers
and
can
think
and
think
on,
multiple
levels.
At
the
same
time,
the
problem
comes
from
the
multiple
conversations
we've
had
with
the
planning
staff
in
one-on-one
and
public
meetings.
B
When
we
asked
staff
to
lower
development
heights
of
up
to
295
feet
on
lot
lines
next
to
existing
neighborhoods,
and
only
three
very
small
areas
of
the
240
acre
staff
staff
paints
us
as
anti-housing.
This
is
the
furthest
thing
from
the
truth.
We
have
a
long
history
of
supporting,
dense
housing
and
affordable
developments.
B
This
disrespect
and
tension
with
the
planning
staff
has
soured
our
relationship
with
urban
catalyst.
We
couldn't
consider
supporting
a
non-housing
project
for
fear
that
the
loss
of
housing
units
would
be
used
by
the
planning
department
to
justify
denying
our
request
to
lower
heights
in
other
areas.
This
isn't
fair
to
anyone.
B
K
Good
evening,
mayor
members,
members
of
council,
this
is
ben
leach
executive
director
of
the
preservation
action
council
of
san
jose.
I
just
want
to
observe
that
in
the
presentation
it
was,
it
was
acknowledged,
but
not
not
highlighted
that
three
residential
existing
residential
properties-
older,
not
technically
historic
but
turn
of
the
century
buildings-
are
being
proposed
for
demolition.
K
They
don't
rise
to
the
level
of
being
city
landmarks,
so
they're
not
considered
historic
resources
from
sequa
standards,
but
they
in
our
opinion,
would
very
well
have
been
considered
structures
of
merit
and
that
determination
was
not
made
and
or
didn't
need
to
be
made
by
the
by
the
sequel
process,
but
is
is
sort
of
a
a
plainly
acknowledged
feature
of
the
dsap
plan
that
these
structures
of
merit
contribute
to
the
character
of
the
neighborhood,
and
there
are
certain
steps
that
we
think
are
reasonable
in
addressing
these
these
structures
of
merit
now
this
is
this
is
indicative
of
a
larger
problem
that
huge
swaths
of
the
city
and
huge
swaths
of
of
this
neighborhood,
which
is
an
extremely
hot
neighborhood
for
development,
have
never
been
inventoried.
K
So
you
know
this
is
the
process
that
we
think
should
be
flagged
and
when
development
is
proposed
for
areas
that
are
very
vulnerable,
that
the
inventory
should
be
more
proactive
than
it
is
historic
and
older
houses
are
affordable
by
definition
and
we're
losing
them
at
a
time
when
the
city
is
trying
to
prioritize
the
preservation
of
existing
houses,
and
it's
really
at
cross
purposes,
and
we
would
hope
that
in
the
future,
this
won't
be
the
last
development
that
there
is
a
a
better
process
for
avoiding
the
loss
of
our
historic
building
stock.
A
B
Has
engaged
in
extensive
outreach
with
the
neighborhood
and,
as
always,
councilmember
perales
has
worked
diligently
with
the
community
to
make
sure
concerns
are
addressed.
The
staff
and
council
members
outline
significant
compromises,
such
as
reduced
height
and
increased
setbacks
to
accommodate
neighbors
and
provide
a
smooth
transition.
B
L
I
have
attended
community
meetings,
backyard
meetings
and
have
seen
where
they
have
responded
to
our
requests
and
our
needs
that
we've
voiced
as
a
concern.
So
I'm
also
aware
that
they've
added
four
units
of
affordable
housing
to
the
project,
which
also
which
also
as
an
affordable
housing,
advocate,
I'm
very
happy
about.
L
I
believe
that
this
project
meets
the
city's
needs
and
the
needs
of
our
community
and
that
there
is
a
great
need
for
more
senior
housing
in
our
area.
So
please
move
forward
on
this
project.
We
need
to
push
forward
with
these
development
projects
that
meet
the
current
dsap
criteria
and
downtown
design
guideline
criteria.
P
Good
evening,
mayor
lucardo,
members
of
the
council,
scott
niece,
san
jose
downtown
association.
I
think
this
is
the
first
major
senior
project
we've
had
in
the
downtown
since
the
town
park,
towers
or
casa
del
pueblo.
We
really
this
type.
It's
been
a
long
time.
We
really
need
this
type
of
facility.
I
I
know
with
the
memory
care
that's
being
offered
here,
my
mom
suffered
from
alzheimer's
the
last
years
of
her
life
and
and
we
needed
memory
care
services.
P
I
I
know
that
this
with
our
aging
population,
there's
a
real
need
and
increasing
demand
for
this
plus
part
of
the
diversity
of
our
downtown
is
is
having
space
for
our
elders.
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
this
project
is
a
local
development
team,
a
local
architect
then
doe
from
adis.
These
are
both
both
downtown.
P
Pioneers
that
are
here
to
stay
and
work
and
be
part
of
our
community.
I
also
want
to
point
out
that,
because
of
the
way
this
project
is
defined,
it
is
a
commercial
project
and
will
be
paying
the
commercial
linkage
fee,
as
well
as
providing
this.
This
much
needed
housing
in
a
place
where
it
should
be
appreciate.
Your
support
tonight.
A
Thank
you,
leela
jim
ellis,
welcome,
good
to
hear
from
you.
I
No,
please
well,
so
thank
you,
so
much
city,
council
and
mayor
ricardo
for
giving
me
this
opportunity
to
speak
in
support
of
this
project.
I
live
in
the
delmas
community.
I
It
adds
diversity
to
the
type
of
housing
that
we
have
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
really
high
density
housing
coming
in
in
future
years
and
this
sort
of
breaks
that
up
as
it
integrates
into
our
community.
I
I
really
appreciate
urban
catalysts
outreach
throughout
the
process
and
the
flexibility
and
the
changes
that
they've
made
in
listening
to
us
as
a
community
they've
been
very
thoughtful.
That
way,
I
really
look
forward
to
this
project
moving
forward.
Thank
you.
So
much.
A
Thank
you,
lyla
valerie,
inglebright,.
A
I
Hello
council,
my
name
is
val
englebright
and
I'm
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
carlson
management
group,
I
got
acquainted
with
the
carlson
management
in
2018
when
parents
were
in
need
of
finding
an
assistive
police
department.
I
live
in
fairfield
and
decided
to
look
at
places
within
a
50-mile
radius
of
my
location.
I
After
looking
at
several
establishments,
I
was
really
impressed
by
a
place
called
rockville
terrace.
It
was
located
in
fairfield,
which
was
perfect
for
our
family.
Upon
arrival
at
rockville
terrace,
I
was
pleasantly
surprised
by
the
beautiful
and
comfortable
interiors
and
roaring
fireplaces
that
gave
a
homey
feel
to
everyone
at
entered.
I
I
The
calls
and
management
understands
what's
important
to
each
community.
They
enter.
They
give
a
second
wind
of
life
to
people
that
their
choices
have
been
narrowed.
Within
these
walls,
my
parents
got
to
enjoy
life
again.
They
could
emerge
from
their
home
now
and
enjoy
others
at
others
at
their
age,
with
events
and
parties
and
concerts
within
their
community.
I
I
first
met
j
and
jason
reyes,
the
owner
of
calcium
management,
at
a
fundraiser
in
vacaville,
in
which
he
had
employees
attending
with
him.
This
very
generous
man
has
done
many
great
things,
not
only
for
seniors
in
our
community,
but
for
the
community
itself.
One
example
of
his
character
is
during
the
time
of
the
pandemic.
I
Not
only
do
they
give
a
new
lease
on
life,
but
they
do
what
they
do
is
provide
a
great
care
for
the
residents
and,
above
all,
fellowship
and
friendship
that
may
not
have
become
that
have
become
non-existent
for
our
seniors.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
and
I
encourage
the
council
to
approve
this
project
tonight.
P
Good
evening,
thank
you,
matthew,
reed
from
silicon
valley
at
home.
This
is
not
an
affordable
housing
project.
This
isn't
a
place
where
we
would
normally
weigh
in.
I
wanted
to
share
some
thoughts
because
we
have
been
following
this
project
and
the
evolution
over
time,
and
I
think
we've
been
really
impressed
by
the
the
responsiveness
of
of
the
the
development
team
and
particularly
the
coordination
and
the
ongoing
work
and
leadership
of
council
member
paralysis
office.
P
The
access
to
transit
for
families
of
of
seniors
in
this
type
of
facility
is
really
valuable.
It
opens
up
opportunities
for
more
different
people.
It
creates
diversity
in
that
part
of
the
the
plan
area
and
in
that
neighborhood,
and
we
we
think
it's
really
a
valuable
addition,
and
we
know
the
planning
staff
has
been
bending
over
backwards
and
working
hard
to
be
responsive
and
combinate,
accommodate
the
the
balance
of
city
interests
in
in
the
plan
area.
P
From
our
perspective,
including
the
critical
integration
of
housing
and
affordable
housing,
making
sure
that
we
can
do
the
most
we
can,
but
while
being
responsive
to
the
neighborhood
concerns,
this
project
does
not
conflict
with
the
dsa
amendments
that
are
under
consideration
and
therefore
we
think
it's
really
important
that
it
it
goes
ahead.
This
is
a
downtown
for
the
entire
city.
We
think
this
project
can
be
an
asset
to
that
neighborhood.
P
We
recognize
the
challenges
going
ahead,
but
the
the
kind
of
coordination
that
we've
seen
around
this
project,
I
think,
is
a
good
omen
for
the
future,
and
we
we
hope
you
all
can
support
it.
Thanks.
A
Thank
you.
Jacob
welcome.
R
Hi,
my
my
name
is
jake
lavin.
Thanks
for
the
time
I
would
like
to
see.
The
dsap
include
appropriate
guidelines
for
how
new
development
interfaces
with
existing
residential
neighborhoods
in.
In
retrospect,
you
know
we
were
caught
between
all
of
the
planning
that
you
know
continues
to
go
on
in
our
neighborhood
and
and
the
developers
were
confronted
with
the
65
foot
height
limit
and
did
receive
feedback
from
the
neighborhood
to
reduce
the
height
along
san
carlos.
R
I
think,
if
we
had
done
this
differently,
this
the
staff
and
and
the
neighborhood
would
have
supported
higher
height
along
san
carlos,
so
that
the
interface
with
the
residential
neighborhood
to
the
south,
which
is
an
objective
to
preserve
in
all
of
the
planning
efforts
dating
back
to
you,
know
the
early
2000s
you
know,
could
have
a
better
interface
there's.
A
lot
of
you
know.
Distinguished
speakers
who've
commented
on
the
project
tonight,
but
I
don't
think
anyone
can
say
that
this
really
has
an
ideal
interface
with
a
single
family.
Neighborhood.
R
There's
a
zero
foot
setback
on
all
sides.
It's
it's
six
stories
right
up
to
the
edge.
You
know
the
the
street
section
on
this
very
narrow
residential
street
is
basically
an
eight
foot
section
from
the
curb
to
the
face
of
the
building.
R
Yes,
the
the
building
is
set
back
on
the
ground
floor
to
10
feet,
but
even
that
is
not
really
a
comfortable
setback
for
for
street
trees
and
what
you
know.
I
would
hope
there
would
be
some
amount
of
of
of
landscaping
at
the
base
of
the
building.
So
you
know
you
know
it.
It
concerns
me
that
we're
moving
forward
with
very
extensive
development
plans-
and
this
is
the
best
we
can
do
for
an
interface
with
an
existing
neighborhood.
B
B
B
B
Therefore,
I
took
it
upon
myself
to
take
care
of
him
at
home,
which
was
extremely
physically
meant
and
mentally
challenging
my
father
passed
away
a
few
years
ago,
but
if
he
were
still
around
today,
I
would
have
been
very
excited
to
introduce
him
to
the
dullness
senior
living
center
that
uc
plans
to
build
besides
the
senior
center.
I
am
a
great
supporter
of
urban
catalyst.
As
a
group,
I
do
believe
that
they
select
and
design
their
projects
for
the
interests
of
the
community
in
the
mine.
B
A
Thank
you
mike
sotogren
is
our
final
final
public
speaker.
K
Hi
mike
sodergren
preservation
action
council.
I
want
to
start
by
saying
thank
you
to
my
city,
council
and
staff
for
the
hard
work
you
guys
do
every
day,
so
even
in
disagreement
on
projects,
I'm
really
proud
to
be
a
citizen
of
san
jose.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
mike.
I
just
want
to
address.
You
know
a
personal
comment
about
this
kind
of
housing.
My
mom
recently
passed
away.
K
K
One
of
the
concerns
that
I
see
with
the
project
and
it's
it's
a
gentle
concern
is
the
city
is
envisioning
a
future
with
less
and
less
cars
around
developments
of
all
types,
and
it's
really
really
important
to
the
residents
of
a
assisted
living
facility
and
especially
in
memory
care
units
to
have
access
to
parking,
and
that
can
be
all
hours
of
the
day
if
mom
or
dad
is
having
a
hard
time.
K
So
I
don't
know
that
there's
enough
parking
on
this
project
to
accommodate
the
times
of
day
when
there
might
be
need
by
the
residents,
but
I
just
bring
that
up
for
thought
really
from
a
preservationist
standpoint.
We
hate
to
see
those
three
turn
of
the
century
buildings
go
it's
yet
more.
You
know
urban
catalyst,
isn't
the
only
one?
K
That's
you
know
developing
on
these
on
these
buildings,
but
what
the
concern
is
the
cumulative
impact
and
each
of
these
projects
in
and
of
themselves
make
good
cases,
but
mayor
and
council
persons,
I'm
just
asking
you
to
envision
what
it's
going
to
look
like
from
santana
row
to
87.
K
A
A
I
think
your
device
is
still
muted.
I
I
think
you
need
to
dial,
I
think
it's
the
asterisk
six
corrector.
Is
it
nine
henry?
Forgive
me
star
six
star,
six
yeah
star
six.
If
you
can
dial
the
star
six,
your
phone
will
be
unmuted
and
we'll
be
able
to
hear
you.
A
G
I'm
muting
here
thank
you
very
much
mayor
and
in
to
our
planning
staff
and
developer
and
to
all
of
our
public
speakers
who
came
out
and
and
stuck
with
us
today.
It's
been
a
long
long
day
long
evening,
and
you
know
it's
not
uncommon,
to
reach
these
decisions
and
with
varying
points
of
view
from
the
community,
and
though
I
know
we
can't
satisfy
everyone.
G
Hopefully
I
can
help
clear
up
some
of
the
the
concerns
that
were
brought
up
today
and
over
the
past
past
couple
of
days.
So
as
shared
in
our
memo,
I
wanted
to
to
commend
the
community
and
the
developer
for
working
together
and
with
our
office
to
put
forth
this
project.
G
We
appreciate
the
applicant
responding
to
my
office
request
to
stay
within
the
confines
of
our
currently
approved
2014
dsap
updates,
rather
than
to
preempt
the
the
current
update.
That
is
happening
in
the
dire
station
area
for
excuse
me,
and
I
want
to
thank
them
for
diligently
responding
back
to
all
the
community
feedback.
G
I
want
to
thank
tong
bo
from
adis
architecture
for
his
world-class
design.
Work
architecture
is
certainly
a
form
of
art
and
and
at
times
and
and
it's
noteworthy
to
highlight
the
design
here
by
a
vietnamese-owned
architecture
firm
in
regards
to
the
the
the
use
of
the
building.
G
I
did
want
to
address
the
comment
from
the
letter
that
was
sent
yesterday
january
25th,
and
I
understand
there
was
a
concern
with
the
subject
line
in
which
was
titled,
the
dalmas
senior
living,
which
is
actually
what
is
entitled
in
our
planning.
Commission
reports
is
what
the
applicant
has
chose
to
name
this
project,
and
there
is
some
confusion
between
a
residential
care
facility
versus
a
senior
living
property
and
and
to
to
be
clear.
What
I
understand
this
project
will
be
is
an
age
restricted.
G
It's
not
an
age,
restricted,
market
rate,
housing,
community
and-
and
I
certainly
myself
right
was
confused
in
regards
to
the
nuance,
difference
there
and
really
the
confusion
in
the
title
itself,
and
so
I
I
did
want
to
invite
up
jason
reyes
from
carlson
management,
who
will
be
the
operator
for
the
project
to
see
if
he
can
expand
further
on
what
we
should
actually
expect
to
see
out
of
an
rcfe
or
a
residential
care
for
the
elderly
facility.
D
D
D
Seniors
in
their
80s,
in
fact,
you
know
I
own
and
operate
eight
communities
throughout
the
bay
area
manage
over
600
residents,
and
you
know
out
of
that
600
residents.
The
primary
profile
is
an
82
year
old,
widowed,
woman
and-
and
that's
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
reasons
that
go
behind
that.
But
essentially
yes,
this
is
a
licensed.
E
Facility,
it
is
age
restricted
by
the
definition
of
the
state.
E
Move
in
and
every
square
inch
of
this
building
will
be.
G
Certainly
again,
you
know,
I
think,
appreciate
the
understanding
there
and
and
the
restrictions
in
regards
to
the
fact
that
we
are
talking
about
a
particular
population
and
specifically
seniors
or
those
for
the
most
part
over
62,
and
certainly
those
in
need
of
residential
care
and-
and
I
definitely
would
echo
some
of
the
comments
any
scott
niece
made
it
and
that
we
don't
see
these
types
of
developments
enough
and
so
and
definitely
looking
forward
to
to
this
opportunity
for
our
our
community
members,
and
hopefully
that
provides
some
clarity
for
my
colleagues
in
the
community
in
regards
to
the
the
dsap
update
and
the
larger
issue
there.
G
G
That
may
not
be
the
case,
but
the
likelihood
here
is
is
that
we
have
likely
a
low
bar
with
the
current
plan,
as
our
our
dsap
update
is
specifically
strategizing
to
increase
density,
and
so
I
did
want
to
ask
a
question
of
our
planning
staff
to
see
if
you
could
respond
to
the
the
concerns
regarding
how
this
commercial
project
may
impact
the
decisions
on
the
heights
and
the
density
in
our
dsat
plan.
Update.
T
Thank
you,
councilmember
rosalyn,
huey,
director
of
pbce.
So
as
you're
aware,
staff
have
been
working
on
the
amended
deerdown
station
area
plan
since
gosh
early
2020.
T
In
the
spring
of
last
year,
we
actually
released
what
we
considered
our
initial
height
concepts
for
the
amended
dsat,
and
we
thought
this
was
really
important
to
get
out
early
in
the
community
to
share
our
initial
thoughts,
primarily
because
one
of
the
main
reasons
we
are
amending,
that
is
because
of
the
city
council,
the
height
in
the
in
the
dsap
area.
T
So
we
know
that
maximizing
those
new
heights
was
something
very
important
to
the
city
council,
and
so
we
got
our
initial
recommendations
or
concept
out
early
and
at
the
time
when
we
first
released
those
concepts.
This
particular
area
in
the
dsap
was
looked
at
at
a
height
of
110
feet
and
that's
where
we're
still
considering
we've
released
the
the
draft,
amended
dsap
last
fall
and
we're
in
the
process
now
of
doing
continued
community
engagement.
G
Thank
you
and
I
recognize
right-
that's
that's
still
in
in
in
flux,
and
so
we
haven't
solidified
that,
but
I
think
certainly,
as
I
mentioned
as
well,
you
know
the
trajectory
overall
in
the
dsab
area
is,
is
going
up
and
and
certainly
higher
and
more
dense,
and
so,
and
that
was
a
big
reason
why
as
well,
I
I
encouraged
our
developer
to
to
try
to
stick
within
the
the
currently
approved
dsap
plan,
and
so
in
regards
to
the
concerns
on
the
the
southern
property
line
there.
G
As
was
stated
in
our
our
joint
memo.
We
make
some
recommendations
in
regards
to
things
like
green
screen.
G
Landscaping
features
and
I
and
I
recognize
their
concerns
from
the
neighbors
and,
as
we
heard
today
in
regards
to
the
to
the
setback
or
lack
thereof,
quite
frankly,
of
the
setback
on
the
southern
property
line
and
and
just
to
be
specific
with
my
my
colleagues,
any
development
would
have
to
follow
our
our
current
downtown
design
guidelines
and
this
one
does
and
what
our
guidelines
state
is
that
for
a
development
that
is
70
feet
or
lower,
that
it
could
have
this.
G
This
zero
foot
setback
essentially
going
up
to
the
property
line
and
then
anything
above
70
feet
would
then
be
required
to
have
a
setback,
and
so
this
is
below
that
70
feet
again,
as
I
stated
in
the
opening,
you
know,
there
certainly
are,
are
always
differing
opinions
on
where
our
policies
should
lie,
but
our
our
current
approved
guidelines
will
allow
a
development
that
is
under
70
feet
to
to
not
have
a
setback,
even
if
it
is
adjoining
to
an
r2
which
this
general
plan
actually
on.
G
The
southern
end
is
even
though,
currently
it's
a
commercial
lot,
it
is,
it
is
planned
for
residential,
so
it
does
follow
the
guidelines
we
may
have
community
members
with
concerns
on
those
guidelines.
Those
also
change
periodically,
and
so
there's
certainly
opportunities
to
go
in
and
update
those.
G
But
I
think
the
reality
is
is
that
we've
tried
to
strike
a
balance
between
the
development
and
density,
the
the
amount
of
housing
that
we're
looking
for,
especially
in
the
downtown
core
and
what
would
be
acceptable
and
not,
and
this
70-foot
threshold
for
that
setback
is,
is
where
we've
landed,
and
so
this
project
falls
within
those
guidelines
and,
and
hopefully
that
can
can
address
or
clear
up
some
of
the
concerns,
maybe
that
my
colleagues
might
have
had
it
in
regards
to
that.
G
Lastly,
I
know
that
staff
has
been
working
with
the
neighborhood
to
address
concerns,
and
I
know
that
staff
and
community
members
have
strived
to
work
together.
This
is
not
an
easy
task.
I've
sat
in
on
many
of
the
virtual
community
meetings
and
I
think
that
perhaps
channeling
all
the
feedback
through
one
conduit
might
be
helpful
and,
as
was
requested
by
community
members,
I
would
like
to
ask
rosalind
one
more
thing,
which
would
be
if
it
would
be
possible
to
assign
a
community
or
assign
this
community.
T
Or
thank
you
councilmember.
We
have
been
working
with
the
neighborhood
for
for
several
months
and
continuing
to
look
forward
to
working
with
them
on
the
dsap
amendment
and
obviously
other
projects
in
and
around
their
community
and
sure.
If
it's
going
to
help
to
streamline
the
amount
of
information-
and
we
understand
there
is
a
lot
of
development
going
on
in
the
area
a
lot
of
information
to
decipher.
T
So
we
would
be
glad
to
establish
a
single
point
of
contact
for
the
community
if
that
would
be
helpful,
because
obviously
it's
important
to
us
as
well
to
get
the
communication
very
open
and
to
make
sure
that
the
community
is
getting
the
information
they
need
in
order
to
provide
us
the
feedback
that
we
do
want
to
see.
So
we
will
be
glad
to
do
that.
G
Thank
you
and
I'm
hopeful
that
that
that
can
help
as
well
moving
forward
so
again
appreciate
rosa
andrew
and
your
team's
work
and
everybody's
participation,
our
community
members
as
well
tonight
and
I'll
make
the
motion
to
approve
the
memorandum
that
I
co-signed
with
the
mayor
council,
members,
davis,
arenas
and
mayhem.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
H
My
father's
suffering
from
alzheimer's-
and
you
know
just
as
a
personal
anecdote-
my
family's
had
a
really
hard
time
finding
a
care
facility
placement
for
him,
especially
at
a
price
point
that
we
can
afford
and,
as
I
think
we
all
know
for
these
kinds
of
placements,
like
our
entire
housing
crisis,
we
just
don't
have
enough
supply
and
while
I
know
development
is
hard
and
change
is
difficult
and
the
changing
character
of
our
neighborhoods
is
hard,
and
I
don't
really
want
to
rehash
debates
over
the
size
of
the
project.
You
know.
H
I
do
think
this
isn't
a
great
location,
and
I
really
think
an
argument
could
be
made
that,
given
that
we
we
build
these
buildings
for
50
100,
maybe
more
years
and
they're,
expensive
and
time
consuming
to
build-
and
this
particular
development
is-
is
located
in
really
an
incredible
location
on
a
major
thoroughfare
with
access
to
transit
and
a
pretty
good
walkability
score
and
serving
a
vulnerable
population.
I
I
just,
I
can't
think
of
a
better
place
where
we'd
want
to
maximize
the
use
of
the
land
to
support
as
many
people
as
possible.
H
So
just
you
know,
I
wanted
to
add
my
voice
to
those
particularly
members
of
the
public,
who
spoke
so
eloquently
in
supporting
this
as
part
of
a
broader
vision
for
a
more
inclusive
and
vibrant
city
and
especially
downtown
core
that
just
has
so
much
potential.
So
I'm
I'm
personally
excited
just
just
wanted
to
add
that
quickly
and
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
sign
on.
Thank
you,
councilmember
perales
and
thank
you
mayor.
H
A
You
councilmember,
thanks
to
all
the
members
of
the
community
who
came
out
to
speak
on
on
all
sides
here
and
appreciate
that
dang
and
and
many
dilma's
neighbors
have
been
working.
A
You
know
putting
in
a
lot
of
hours,
in
addition
to
their
all
their
own
daily
responsibilities
of
of
work
and
family,
to
advocate
in
positive
ways,
recognizing
there's
going
to
be
significant
change
in
this
neighborhood
and
obviously
wanting
to
ensure
that
change
doesn't
disrupt
what
is
important
and
most
precious
to
the
residents
in
dalmas
and
the
surrounding
area.
So
I
appreciate
their
advocacy.
A
I
appreciate
that
occasionally,
as
a
city,
we
can
often
be
moving
very
fast,
and
that
means
that
we
may
not
be
paying
attention
to
to
every
detail
that
we
should
be
and
we're
going
to
be,
having
to
continue
to
go
back
and
revisit,
as
our
residents
point
out
shortcomings.
So
we're
going
to
continue
to
do
that,
but
I'm
convinced
that
we've
got
a
team,
that's
committed
to
ensuring
that
we
do
this.
A
Well,
we
do
this
collaboratively
in
that
area
as
we
should
be
doing
throughout
the
city,
and
I
also
want
to
thank
customer
prosperous
leadership.
Urban
catalyst,
certainly
for
their
investment
in
this
very
needed
resource
for
our
community,
and
I
know
the
argument
has
been
made
that
somehow
another
because
it's
a
regional
residential
care
facility
that
the
residents
won't
be
active
enough
to
be
using
transit,
but
I'm
pretty
confident
the
50
or
60
employees
certainly
will
be,
and
those
are
transit
dependent
residents.
A
We
absolutely
need
to
serve
and,
and
that
will
be
a
vital
lifeline
for
them
to
get
to
work.
So
I
appreciate
the
location
of
this
as
well.
Thank
you
thank
doe
for
what
appears
to
be
at
least
preliminarily,
a
very
vibrant
design
and
great
to
have
a
local
architect
involved,
leading
the
charge
as
well.
So
I
look
forward
to
to
seeing
the
the
shovels
hit
the
ground
and
and
hopefully
adding
a
great
resource
for
seniors
in
our
community.
P
B
L
B
A
Okay,
everybody
we're
on
the
last
item
of
the
evening
item
10.4
privately,
initiate
general
plan
amendment
and
a
conforming
rezoning
on
property
located
at
790
ports,
wood
drive
and
bret
hart
drive.
There
is
a
presentation
take
away.
B
T
Right
so
the
item
before
council
tonight,
this
last
general
planned
amendment
also
includes
a
conforming
rezoning,
and
this
is
for
an
8.6
acre
site
located
in
the
almaden
neighborhood
area
at
portwood,
drive
and
brett
hart
drive,
and
this
is
actually
property
under
pg
e.
That
currently
has
electrical
utility
structures.
T
It
was
actually
formally
reserved
for
a
pg
e
substation,
but
that
project
was
was
not
built,
so
this
slide
shows
you
both
the
existing
land
use
designations
and
the
proposed
land
use
designation.
So
the
change
is
from
existing
transportation
utilities
to
residential
neighborhood,
which
is
a
land
use
designation
that
supports
primarily
single-family
development.
T
T
A
community
meeting
for
the
project
was
held
on
august
25th
of
last
year.
The
key
concerns
that
we
heard
from
residents
included
questions
about
the
procedural
process
and
the
timeline
for
the
project,
as
well
as
questions
clarifying
the
type
of
residential
development
clarifying
that
it
was
for
single-family
home
development
and
not
multi-family.
T
T
And
mayor,
I
believe
the
project
applicant
summerhill
homes
is
on
the
call
for
either
a
presentation
or
available
to
answer
questions.
There's
denise
cunningham
there.
I
Thank
you
appreciate
your
time
this
evening.
I
This
is
denise
cunningham,
vice
president
of
development
for
summerhill
homes,
and
for
those
of
you
who
aren't
familiar
with
summer
hill,
we're
a
local
builder
in
the
bay
area
have
been
in
business
for
over
40
years
and
provide
a
diversity
of
housing
specializing
in
infill
development,
and
this
property
is
ideal
for
a
small
infill
development,
we're
currently
in
contract
with
pg
e
to
process
the
zone,
change
and
the
general
plan
amendment,
and
once
this
process
is
complete,
we
will
look
at
proceeding
with
design
level
work
summer.
Health
engaged
the
community
on
four
occasions.
I
We
had
two
outreach
meetings
with
the
neighborhood.
In
early
march,
we
participated
in
the
city's
outreach
in
august
of
2020,
and
we
had
a
follow-up
zoom
meeting
as
well
in
september
with
neighborhoods,
so
we've
listened
to
the
community
and
we
will
take
their
comments
into
consideration
once
design
level
work
begins
and
we
would
schedule
a
new
meeting
to
continue
that
outreach
in
that
dialogue
like
to
thank
you
for
your
time
this
evening
and
really
I'm
here
to
answer
questions.
If
you
have
any.
A
All
right,
then,
we'll
go
to
members
of
the
public
first.
If
there
any
members
of
the
public
would
like
to
speak
on
this
item
10.4.
A
E
Yes,
good
evening
again,
council
paul
soto
from
the
horseshoe.
My
question
would
be
to
the
council.
Why
is
this?
Why
is
there
not
a
challenge
for
a
multi-family
designation
rather
than
single-family
home?
I
agree
with
councilman
mahan
with
his
comments
that
there's
just
a
housing
shortage.
I
agree
totally
so
I
would
ask
his
his
support
in
with
this
particular
issue,
to
re-articulate
that
argument
to
summer
hill,
because
why
do
certain
areas
of
the
city?
E
Why
are
they
permitted
to
have
that
type
of
designation,
whereas
in
certain
other
areas
there's
just
this
real
push
for
concentrated
density
housing?
And
we
hear
the
you
know,
we
hear
the
bad,
we
hear
the
raws
and
we
see
the
banners
of
people
really
pushing
for
high
density
housing,
but
in
this
particular
area,
however,
there
is
a
different
tone.
E
You
know,
and
and
and
I'm
concerned
about
that
you
know-
I'm
really
concerned
about
this
creation,
this
constant
creation
of
enclaves
of
single
family
homes
and
they
feel
the
sense
of
entitlement
and
the
sense
of
exclusivity
as
a
result
of
that,
and
we
as
a
city
are
actually
complicit
in
that
when
we
don't
challenge
the
developers
and
the
home
builders
or
challenge
ourselves
and
say
you
know
what
man
we
no
we
got
to
so
this
is
direction.
We
got
to
go,
that's
just
all
there
is
to
it.
E
We
got
people
dying
in
the
creeks,
we
got
people
dying
as
a
result
of
homelessness.
You
know
I
was
just
homeless
recently,
so
that
was
a
that
was
one
hell
of
a
challenge
in
this
city.
That
was
one
hell
of
a
challenge,
but
I
rose
up
my
city.
My
county
was
able
to
give
me
dust
me
off
and
keep
going.
So
I
would
ask
that
question
and
challenge,
mr
man,
if
he
can
articulate
that
argument
to
summerhill.
Thank
you.
A
E
B
Thank
you,
mr
mayor
and
yeah.
I
was
taken
surprised
to
see
single
family
permits,
but
I
can
guess
because
it's
not
along
a
dense
corridor,
maybe
one
of
the
reasons
a
little
more
explanation
on
that
and
I
think
the
more
homes
we
can
build
the
better
and
we
we
know
we.
Obviously
it's
not
that
simple,
because
there's
so
many
different
designations.
B
I
do
know
that
we
do
need
more,
affordable
housing
if
there's
some
way
to
make
single-family
homes
affordable
around
here,
which
I
don't
think
is
possible.
It
might
be
something
what
the
other
gentleman
was
talking
about,
maybe
to
look
at.
Thank
you,
mr
mayor
and
council,
and
happy
new
year.
Everybody
thank
you.
H
Question
for
rosalind,
hi
rosalind.
My
understanding
is
that
we
are
being
asked
to
vote
on
a
re-zoning
rezoning,
but
that
the
developer
could
come
back
at
a
future
date
if
they
wanted
to
propose
a
denser
development.
Is
that
correct.
T
Thank
you,
council
members,
so
the
action
that
the
council
is
taking
tonight
is
actually
on
the
general
plan
amendment
so
there's
actually
a
change
in
the
land
use
designation
because
the
property
was
former
or
soon
to
be
former
pg
e.
It
had
a
transportation
utilities,
land
use
designation,
and
so
we
have
to
first
of
all
change
that
designation
to
allow
residential.
So
that's
what
the
applicant
is
proposing.
They
are
also
proposing
the
rezoning
and
councilmember
you're
right.
T
The
next
step
for
this
applicant
would
then
be
to
submit
a
development
permit,
and
that
would
be
the
time
that
we
would
see
the
actual
project.
We
would
see
the
layout
of
the
lots.
There
would
be
discussions.
You
know
about
the
setbacks
about
the
heights
about
the
architectural
design
and
would
be
at
that
time
that
staff
would
review
that
portion
of
the
project.
H
H
A
H
Sure
sorry,
yes,
I'd
like
to
move
that
we
that
we
adopt
the
general
plan
amendment
and
the
rezoning.
A
Mentioned
in
second,
any
other
comments:
questions.
Okay,
let's
vote
on
the
motion.
B
B
C
B
D
B
A
Okay,
all
right,
thank
you.
I
know
that
reigns
cousin
law
had
I
got
there,
so
we
are
now
done
with
the
agenda.
Ronda,
open
forum.
E
Yes,
this
is
this
is
directed
to
at
least
this
start
is
to
councilwoman
carrasco
councilwoman,
I'm
well,
I
am
okay.
I
was,
I
hit
a
really
rough
spot.
You
know
I'm
a
poor
chicano
in
sano,
and
sometimes
that
is
that
in
itself
is
a
challenge
you
know,
but
you
know
like
our
ancestors
and
the
campesinos
in
times
past
we're
resilient
people,
and
we
can
rise
to
the
occasion
when
you
know
just
giving
a
little
carino
and
a
little
bit
of
support.
E
So
I
just
wanted
to
extend
that
to
you
and
let
you
know
that
that
I'm
well
for
the
rest
of
the
council.
Thank
you,
councilman
perales,
for
the
suggestion
of
the
liaison.
I
think
that
would
facilitate
a
lot
of
the
like
missing
pieces
like
they're.
Only
talking
to
this
one
person
or
they're
talking
to
this
person
and
these
people
are
informed,
but
the
general
public
is
not
informed,
especially
with
that
area.
That
area
is
my
carino,
that's
my
love,
you
know,
and
it
is
the
most
red-lined
area
in
the
city.
E
You
know
we
have
to
talk
about
that.
We
did
this.
Eric
hayden
has
to
be
put
on
the
shelf
for
a
minute
man.
His
billions,
don't
impress
me
what
impresses
upon
me
as
a
citizen
of
the
city
is
the
fact
that
it
is
not
confronted
the
redlining
that
created
that
area
in
the
first
place.
So
I
really
appreciate
this
liaison.
E
So
thank
you
for
that,
and
also,
lastly,
I'd
like
to
thank
councilwoman
arenas
for
your
views
on
making
a
viable
pathway
to
our
youth
towards
internships,
not
just
like
you
said
not
just
an
internship
for
a
little
while,
but
actually
a
pathway
to
these
types
of
industries
so
that
they
not
only
are
viable
employees
but
viable
citizens
to
the
city
that
raise
them.
Thank
you.
Peace
out.
B
Darby,
well,
I
I
want
to
just
say
thank
you
to
all
of
you.
It's
been
a
really
rough
year
and
that's
just
2021.,
mr
mayor
and
vice
mayor,
mr
jones
once
told
me,
don't
read
the
comments
in
online
posts
and
I
have
to
admit
that
we
need
to
get
back
to
that,
because
I
refuse
to
believe
half
or
whatever.
Whoever
voted
for
the
other
administration
are
terrible
people.
I
will.
B
I
don't
believe
that
I
think
some
may
have
been,
but
we've
just
got
to
get
past
all
that
we
do
have
to
hold
people
accountable
for
what
happened
on
january
6th
that
was
planned
sort
of
outside
the
purview
here.
But
the
council
here
really
has
made
a
difference
in
my
life.
I
wouldn't
have
a
place
to
stay
in
my
retirement.
B
B
B
I'm
sad
that
they
couldn't
have
kept
the
transfer
to
affordable
housing,
but
it's
hard
to
put
that
on
a
family
they're
doing
what
the
best
they
can
with
what
they
had
the
land
here
is
just
gold
comes
that,
but
what's
really
gold
is
you
folks
and
us,
and
people
people
are
far
more
important
than
land
money
or
anything
else.
Thank
you.
A
Well
said,
mr
darby,
thank
you,
mr
sergeant.
K
Yeah,
I
just
want
to
add
one
quick
comment
as
a
city
as
we
start
looking
at
more
of
these
rc
fe
facilities,
I
guess
I
would
just
ask
planning
it's
been
my
experience
that
that
means
there's
going
to
be
an
engine
company
at
the
facility
every
night,
so
from
a
access
standpoint,
you
know
for
our
firefighters,
you
know
to
provide
that
support,
that
is
common
for
facilities
like
that.
I
just
wonder
how
that
fits
into
the
access
at
the
facilities
as
well
just
for
future
thought.
Thank
you.