►
From YouTube: AUG 16, 2022 | City Council Afternoon Session
Description
City of San José, California
City Council afternoon session of August 16, 2022
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be held at San José City Hall and also accessible via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=987776&GUID=151F1BA4-58F2-4F91-A21A-E150AACFDB57
A
A
B
August,
the
16th-
and
we
know
we
have
many
council
members
who
are
remote
for
those
who
are
running
wondering
why
we
have
such
an
empty
dice.
It's
not
because
folks
aren't
working
it's
because
they're
working
from
afar,
so
I'll
ask
tony.
If
she
can.
Please
call
the
role.
A
B
Okay,
please
stand
if
you're
able
and
join
us
for
the
pledge
of.
B
All
right,
today's
invitation
will
be
provided
by
the
crmer
crom
buddhist
monks.
We
are
honored
to
have
them
with
us
today
and
council
member
esparza.
If
you
can
hear
us,
I
think
you're
going
to
tell
us
more
is
that
right.
D
Yes,
thank
you
mayor
apologies
for
not
being
able
to
be
there
in
person,
but
today
we
are
honored
to
have
the
khmer
crom
buddhist
monks
from
the
united
khmer
crom
non-profit
organization,
which
is
also
known
as
the
kamari
ranks,
the
kamara
rangzi
temple,
and
I'd
like
to
welcome
the
venerable
bratana
young,
the
venerable
soponrit
khan,
the
venerable
vastner-paul
and
the
venerable
rhian
son,
who
will
be
giving
a
traditional
blessing
for
good
health
success
and
peace
to
all
in
the
pali
language
of
therafada
buddhism,
the
kamara
rangzi
temple
was
founded
in
2002
by
volunteers
and
their
mission
is
to
preserve
and
promote
khmer
identity
and
culture
here
in
san
jose.
D
D
E
E
B
B
A
B
F
Mayor
this
is
council
member
carrasco.
We
have
ceremonial,
we.
B
Sure
do
how
about
that?
Thank
you,
sorry,
my
old
age,
I'm
skipping
a
lot
of
items.
B
Okay,
you're
absolutely
right.
Thank
you,
councilman
mccroska,
for
reminding
me
today
for
those
of
us
who
have
memory
issues.
The
national
senior
center
senior
citizens
day
we're
going
to
recognize
and
proclaim
it
and
council
member
cross
is
going
to
lead
the
charge
and
are
there
members
of
the
community
who
are
here
in
chambers
who
are
part
of
this?
I.
F
Thank
you
so
much
mayor
and
and
and
I
want
to
welcome
our
beautiful
kitkat
to
the
to
the
stage
today,
it's
a
beautiful
day,
it's
a
hot
day,
I
hope
everybody's
staying
hydrated
and
I
don't
forget
to
put
on
that
sunscreen
that
is
going
to
keep
you
safe,
but
I
want
to.
I
want
to
thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
do
things
just
a
little
differently
today,
we're
proclaiming
august
21st,
that's
national
senior
citizen
day
and
and
I'm
not
in
council.
F
Nor
am
I,
in
my
home,
I'm
in
a
beautiful
senior
serving
facility
via
the
guadalupe
one
of
many
on
the
east
side
of
san
jose
and
proud
to
be
here
with
some
of
the
residents.
It's
here
that
my
team
and
I
have
had
the
pleasure
of
connecting
with
an
amazing
community
of
seniors
who
have
embraced
us
so
lovingly
it's
here
that
we've
enjoyed
bringing
zumba
yoga,
healthy
snacks
or
at
least
snacks.
F
I
don't
know
about
whether
they're
all
that
healthy,
but
but
mostly
mostly
really,
we've
enjoyed
the
companionship
of
our
residents
here
and
and
really
diving
into
some
deep
dialogue
and
hopefully
bringing
their
voices
to
the
table
because
when
you
engage
with
the
community,
you
know
that
you
learn
from
them
and
you
really
understand
what
their
needs
and
what
their
challenges
are
and,
through
these
conversations
come
a
a
a
sobering
reminder
that
the
effects
of
the
pandemic
were
catastrophic,
especially
causing
untold
fear
and
suffering
among
our
seniors
early
during
the
pandemic,
more
than
a
third
of
the
county's
first
cobit
19
deaths
had
swept
through
the
east
side
of
san
jose
just
for
zip
codes
on
the
east
side
of
san
jose,
coupled
with
the
tragedy.
F
We
we
read
distressing
reports,
indicating
instances
of
neglect,
depression
and
mistreatment,
and
let
me
be
very
clear:
isolation
is
the
number
one
affliction
of
our
seniors,
often
affecting
us
as
badly
as
the
pandemic
itself,
and
as
we
move
towards
recovery
they
reel
over
the
loss
of
friends
family.
They
slowly
are
making
their
way
back
to
spaces
that
they
once
called
home
as
we
improve
healthcare
and
secure
continuum
of
care.
The
historic
role
of
our
seniors
becomes
that
much
more
important.
F
There
are
leaders,
there
are
historians,
there
are
the
links
to
our
past
and
truly
they
are
the
the
foundation
that
give
us
a
sense
of
purpose
and
direction.
They
ground
us
in
their
understanding
of
the
world
and
impact
values
through
the
simplest
of
actions.
F
And
they
step
up,
they
sure
do
step
up
serving
as
volunteers
in
various
programs
and
projects
that
benefit
every
sector
of
society
wherever
the
need
exists,
seniors
make
their
presence
felt.
That's
why
it's
such
an
honor
to
present
today's
proclamation
to
katz,
who
has
been
leading
the
latino
club
here
at
via
guadalupe,
in
partnership
with
catholic
charities
cat
and
the
latino
club,
have
been
fierce
social
advocates,
secure
musical
performances,
dances
movie
nights
and
linking
me
to
the
street
safety
improvement
projects
that
we've
been
engaged
in,
and
they
know
how
to
get
it
done.
F
I
want
to
introduce
kat,
who
is
currently
our
villas
reigning,
queen
supreme,
an
annual
beauty
pageant
hosted
by
the
club
where
they
compete
to
see
who
will
be
crowned
la
masveia
de
la
vida,
and
who
can
doubt
that
kitty
cat,
it's
been
a
pleasure
getting
to
share
these
experiences
with
you
and
the
whole
community
here
at
villa.
F
Ultimately,
it's
my
hope
that
my
council
colleagues,
the
administration
and
our
residents
will
look
for
healthy
and
safe
ways
to
engage
with
our
seniors,
and
that
includes,
like
I
am
doing
today-
meeting
them
where
they
are,
we
can't
always
expect
them
to
come
to
us.
We
have
to
go
to
them.
Let's
do
let's
do
right
by
them
and
ensure
that
their
legacies
are
honored.
B
F
E
Plaque
and
we're
gonna
hang
it
in
a
special
place
in
our
senior
place.
So
there
really
not
too
much
to
say
we're
just
trying
to
get.
F
Hopefully,
hopefully
that
it's
gone
very
soon,
but
I
doubt
it
but
anyway,
thank
you
so
much.
We
do
appreciate
it
and
that
you
all
took
time
to
be
with
us.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you
kat.
Thank
you
so
much
mayor.
Thank
you,
council
colleagues,.
B
Thank
you
and
thank
you,
ladies
for
your
participation
and
all
that
you
do
for
our
community.
All
right,
we're
gonna
go
on
now
to
the
consent
calendar.
I
think
that's
where
I
left
off.
Are
there
any
items
that
my
colleagues
would
like
to
pull
going
first
here
in
the
council,
I
don't
see
anyone
raising
their
hands
and
let's
go
to
zoom
now.
Is
there
anyone
like
to
pull
an
item
from
consent.
C
Hi
claire
beekman
here
I'd
just
like
to
quickly
thank
your
your
ceremonial
items
today
and
for
council
president
carrasco
being
at
the
senior
center.
G
C
A
great
place
to
hold
a
zoom
meeting
and
to
be
a
part
of
the
council
meeting
session
process.
B
Okay,
is
there
a
motion
on
consent.
A
E
B
That's
unanimous
we're
moving
on
to
item
3.1,
which
is
the
report
of
our
city
manager,
but
lee
will
do
for
now
no
report
mayor
all
right.
Thank
you,
lee
okay
3.3!
It's
the
agreement
with
agreement,
employee
assistance
program
for
employee
assistance.
B
I
We
are
here
today
to
request
your
approval
to
negotiate
an
agreement
with
concern
who
has
been
selected
through
an
rfp
process
to
provide
our
new
eap
services.
Our
current
vendor
for
these
services
is
mhn,
and
that
has
been
our
vendor
since
1994.
the
contract
with
mhn
is
set
to
expire
on
december
31st.
I
Our
current
plan
includes
mental
health,
counseling
and
work
life,
support
services,
critical
incident
services
and
training.
Right
now
we
offer
five
sessions
per
incident
for
our
non-sworn
employees
and
unlimited
sessions
for
our
sworn
employees
and
public
safety.
Dispatchers
premiums
are
paid
for
by
the
city.
This
is
a
hundred
percent
city
paid
for
benefit
for
benefited
employees
and
their
dependents,
regardless
of
usage.
I
There
we
go
okay,
so
since
we
last
did
an
rfp
for
these
services,
there
has
been
some
things
that
have
changed
in
the
marketplace.
For
the
counseling
benefits.
The
unlimited
counseling
sessions
are
no
longer
offered
and
mhn.
Our
current
vendor
had
notified
us
that
of
us,
so
we
were
aware
of
that
going
into
the
rfp
that
we
were
no
longer
going
to
have
unlimited
counseling
sessions.
I
Substance
abuse,
disorder
treatment
is
now
legally
required
to
be
covered
by
our
health
plans,
so
this
was
covered
under
mhn,
but
since
then
a
law
has
passed.
It's
now
required
to
be
covered
under
our
health
plan,
so
anthem
and
kaiser
do
cover
this.
So
eap
benefits
will
no
longer
provide
substance,
abuse,
disorder,
treatment
and
now
there's
a
different
types
and
methods
of
services
that
are
being
provided
by
eap,
and
this
was
something
that
we
were
interested
in
looking
at
through
the
rfp
process.
I
So
we
did
conduct
an
rfp
for
these
services
and
the
results
are
in
front
of
you
in
this
memo.
We
are
recommending
increasing
the
number
of
sessions
for
our
non-sworn
employees.
I'm
increasing
this
benefit
to
eight
sessions
for
non-sworn,
so
we're
going
from
five
to
eight
and
then,
as
we
mentioned,
the
unlimited
sessions
are
no
longer
available
through
the
rfp
process.
We
are
recommending
that
we
do
20
sessions
for
sworn
employees
and
public
safety
dispatchers,
looking
at
average
number
of
sessions
utilized.
I
This
is
quite
a
bit
higher
and
again,
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
this
is
per
incident.
So
if
there's
one
incident,
you
could
get
20
sessions.
Another
incident
you
would
get
another
20.
and
eap.
Benefits
are
intended
to
be
a
short-term
benefit
for
an
incident
and
if
long-term
benefits
are
needed,
that
is
where
we
there
would
be
referrals
to
anthem
or
kaiser
or
to
your
medical
provider.
I
So
our
recommendation
is
for
concern,
which
is
the
new
aap
company
to
replace
mhn
effective
january
1st
2023.
There
is
an
increased
cost
to
the
city
of
about
fifty
thousand
dollars.
That
would
be
the
premiums
for
calendar
year
2023
and
then
critical
incident
response
services
will
continue
to
be
built
on
a
fee
for
service
basis,
and
with
that
we
are
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
B
Great.
Thank
you
very
much
for
questions
from
my
colleagues,
councilman
cohen,
just
a
quick
question
for
you.
A
I
This
benefit
right
now
is
just
for
current
active
employees.
Retirees
are
not
eligible
for
it
other
than
when
they
retire.
They
can
continue
their
benefit
through
cobra,
but
they
do
have
access
to
mental
health
benefits
through
the
medical
providers,
so
anthem
or
kaiser
or
whatever,
if
they're,
on
a
different
plan
through
that
medical
provider.
Okay,
thank
you.
J
I
J
Okay,
I
I'd
appreciate
that,
and-
and
at
least
I
know,
many
of
the
retirees
are
concerned
at
a
lack
of
mental
health
care
post
once
they're
in
retirement
and
particularly
concerned
about
ptsd,
and
this
is
mostly
for
your
sworn
officers
and
firefighters,
so
they're
concerned
about
suicides
and
other
mental
health
issues
that
affect
them
once
they
leave
their
career.
So
I
I
would
really
appreciate
to
know
what
it
would
cost
to
add
in
the
retirees
and
and
what
that
might
look
like.
Thank
you.
J
That's
the
other
thing
I
want
thank
you
for
mentioning.
That
was
one
of
the
things
I
was
going
to
ask
you
about
is:
how
is
that
communicated
and
what
is
the
benefit
to
retirees
through
their,
whether
they
choose
anthem
or
kaiser,
or
whoever
they
can
choose
post
retirement?
What
kind
of
coverage
do
they.
A
This
get
if
it's
cobra.
A
J
A
J
B
Thank
you.
You
know
I
neglected
to
go
to
the
public,
so
let
me
do
that
and
then
we'll
go
back
to
the
council
for
the
remaining
council
questions.
A
M
M
I
think
that
there
needs
to
be
a
cost
analysis
of
what
the
projections
are
going
to
be
of
the
retirement
costs
of
the
city,
because,
basically,
what
we're
going
to
be
doing
is
we're
going
to
be
paying
out
all
of
this
money
for
the
employees
they're
not
producing
any
work,
we're
not
getting
anything
from
those
particular
workers
and
that's
fine.
They
did
their
time
and
they
got
the
return.
M
That's
fine,
but
those
costs
and
the
increasing
cost
of
both
medical
care
and
the
retirement
benefit
needs
to
be
analyzed
and
placed
within
the
context
of
these
topics
so
that
we
could
get
a
better
analysis
of
what
the
cost
is
gonna
be
rather
than
if
this
person
wants
anthem
or
cobra
it.
It
doesn't
matter
to
me
as
a
citizen
which
one
they
take
that's
a
personal
decision
that
they
have
to
make
between
them
and
their
spouses
and
their
families.
M
M
Those
need
to
be
calculated
in
the
context
of
this
conversation
so
that
we
can
get
a
better
comprehensive
view
of
what
it
is
that
we're
we're
talking
about
and
what
exactly
that's
going
to
mean
for
the
future
of
san
jose.
You
can
do
a
five-year
cost
analysis,
a
10-year
cost
analysis
and
a
15-year
cost
analysis
you're
going
to
have
baby
boomer
generations
they're
already
retiring
now-
and
this
is
the
largest
segment
of
the
workforce,
they're
all
going
into
retirement.
M
So
that
needs
to
be,
like,
I
said,
a
cost
cost
analysis
of
both
of
those
issues,
the
retirement
fund
and
the
medical.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you.
Are
there
questions
from
my
colleagues
online.
D
Hi,
yes,
I
wanted
to
just
state
that
I
agree
and
when
you
spoke,
I
can't
remember
who
it
was.
That's
spoken
to
the
microphone.
I
couldn't
hear
it
the
answer
about
the
retirees
I
heard
that
it
could
go
to
cobra
and
so
one
could
you
repeat
that
answer
into
the
microphone,
so
it
can
be
heard
and
then
I
had
to
follow
up.
I
Sure,
councilmember
esparza,
so
retirees
can
do
two
things.
One
is
when
they
retire.
They
can
continue
their
benefit
through
mhn
through
cobra
and
they
would
be
responsible
for
the
premium.
So
that
would
be
the
mhn
benefit,
but
they
can
only
do
that
for
18
months.
There
is
also
mental
health
benefits
available
in
both
anthem
and
kaiser.
I
So
if
one
of
our
retirees
is
enrolled
in
our
retiree
health
care,
they
could
get
those
mental
health
benefits
through
anthem
or
kaiser.
D
And
so,
if
they
paid,
let's
say
a
thousand
dollars
a
month
to
maintain
cobra
benefits,
they
would
only
get
unlimited.
They
couldn't
even
get
unlimited
counseling
sessions,
because
mhn
is
ending
that
december
31st.
Is
that
correct.
I
Yes,
that
would
be
that
would
be
the
same
for
city
employees,
though
they're.
Not
no
one
is
going
to
be
eligible
for
unlimited
benefits
after
december
31st.
I
We
don't
believe,
that's
correct,
but
we
can
get
you
the
specific
kaiser
benefit.
I
A
D
Okay
and
then
what
we
saw
was
that
the
trending
number
and
I'm
not
sure
what
that
means.
A
trending
number
of
sessions
provided
by
eap
services
is
eight
per
incident
per
year.
So
is
that
a
median?
Is
that
an
industry-wide
median,
so
we
can
assume
that
some
might
be
more
and
some
might
be
less.
What
does
that
mean.
A
So
as
part
of
the
rfp,
we
talked
to
other
public
sector
agencies
and
through
our
consultant
and
determined
that
most
agencies
were
offering
between
five
and
eight.
So
we
we
went
for
eight.
I
I
So
the
usage
for
sworn
in
2021,
the
average
number
of
sessions
was
11.6
and
we're
offering
20.
D
Okay,
great
thank
you
and
then
I
just
wanted
to
add
my
voice
again.
I
would
really
like
to
find
a
way
to
include
our
retirees
on
this.
You
know
I
I
don't
want
to
conflate.
You
know
the
experiences
of
veterans
with
law
enforcement,
but
you
know
my
experience
with
ptsd
services
on
the
veterans.
D
Side
has
indicated
that
you
know
sometimes
folks
aren't
able
to
reconcile
with
things
until
they
leave
until
they
leave
the
service
until
they
start
you
know
civilian
life,
and
so
the
impact
of
things
can
take
a
while
to
hit
and
and
that
counseling
does
need
to
be
made
available.
D
B
Thank
you.
Are
there
other
questions
from
my
colleagues
online
before
I
tony
nope?
Okay,
I
had
a
few
questions.
One
is
I
understand
that
this
this
rfp
was
value
based,
not
cost
based.
B
A
So,
actually,
the
pricing
from
concern
that
we're
paying
now
we
will
be
paying
for
the
non-sworn
is
going
up,
but
the
cost
for
the
the
sworn
and
public
safety
dispatchers
is
going
down,
and
that's
why
the
overall
cost
was
only
50
000
a
year
for
actually
a
larger
benefit.
In
that
we
are,
I
mean
we're
giving
him
20
sessions,
which
is
not
not
typical.
Like
I
said,
the
unlimited
is
not
typical,
but
we
weren't
also
getting
any
of
these
extra
bells
and
whistles
like
the
coaching
which
is
supposed
to
help
with
access.
A
B
A
B
Okay-
and
I
know
you've
heard
my
prior
concerns
about
utilization,
I
see
clearly
you
guys
attempted
to,
and
I
appreciate
you
brought
the
employees
together
in
a
sort
of
a
peak
academy
group,
I'm
trying
to
remember
what
you
call
it.
The.
B
Learning
lab,
thank
you
to
try
to
brainstorm
about
how
to
address
utilization
and-
and
the
hope
is
that
maybe
some
of
these
other
tools,
like
the
telephone
that
the
coaching
and
so
forth,
will
enable
folks
to
utilize
the
service
more
okay.
I
No,
we
definitely
agree
with
that.
I
think
the
better
help,
part
of
it
and
the
app
and
being
able
to
do
a
lot
of
the
telehealth
part
there's
a
big
difference
between
making
an
appointment
having
to
get
in
your
car
drive
to
a
counselor
versus
being
able
to
just
in
your
privacy
of
your
own
home
by
yourself,
opening
up
your
laptop
and
being
able
to
have
that
communication.
B
Okay
and
forgive
me
for
not
being
better
informed
about
medicare,
but
a
significant
number
of
our
retirees
would
be
covered
by
medicare,
presumably
obamacare
before
that.
Do
a
reason
to
believe
they'll
have
access
to
mental
health
care
through
those
services
through
those
programs.
B
I
Anthem
and
kaiser,
and
that's
what
that's
why
we
were
asking
the
office
of
retirement
services
when
this
issue
has
been
coming
up
to
make
sure
that
they're
communicating
that
to
the
retirees,
there's,
definitely
a
access
and
a
shortage
of
counselors
right
now.
So
I
know
there
has
been
problems
with
anthem
with
kaiser.
I've
personally
met
with
kaiser
over
it,
but
mhn
was
having
the
same
issues
so
sure
that
is
definitely
an
issue,
but
it's
not
a
matter
of
them
not
having
access
at
all.
B
Okay,
thank
you
all
right.
Any
other
questions
was
there
a
motion
already.
B
Okay,
is
that
a
zoom
induced
delay
is
that
is
there's
a
problem.
The
connectivity
there.
B
Okay,
all
right
we'll
try
to
work
that
out:
okay,
3.4
our
actions.
Thank
you.
Jennifer
3.4
actions
related
to
the
paint
avenue
park
project.
There's
no
presentation.
Let's
go
to
the
public.
M
Yeah
pulsar
from
the
horseshoe
I
would
have
liked
to
have
had
at
least
some
type
of
presentation.
M
This
is
a
this
is
a
park
that's
located
in
an
area
of
the
city
that
was,
you
know,
obviously
redlined
so
they're
to
to
not
come
to
the
meeting
and
not
think
that
the
public
deserves
or
has
like
as
a
right
to
have
any
kind
of
presentation.
This
is
a
land
use
issue.
This
is
a
park.
There
was
park
deficits
on
certain
parts
of
town.
I
mean
you
know
this
is
gonna
be
this
is
like,
like
you
know
what
it's
almost
like
you
guys.
Just
like
you
know
what
we
don't
care.
M
That's
why
I
come
to
these
meetings,
because
I
have
a
high
expectation
of
the
the
ethical
and
moral
policies,
the
ethical
and
moral
principles
that
are
in
your
policies
or
the
lack
of
the
moral
and
ethical
principles
in
your
policies.
That's
the
only
reason
why
I
spend
all
this
time
here
so
with
respect
to
just
a
particular
land
issue
that
to
come
to
the
meeting
and
say
to
the
public.
M
B
B
Okay,
there's
avalanche
and
parks
coming
to
this
point
are
there
any
members
of
the
council
would
like
to
speak
online.
A
B
N
A
L
B
B
Okay,
let's
return
to
session
now,
I'm
going
to
call
should
I
call
both
items
together:
8.1
and
8.2.
A
B
L
Thank
you,
mayor
and
council,
I'm
here
with
nancy
klein,
director
of
office
of
economic
development
and
cultural
affairs,
and
I'm
here
with
laurie
severino
as
well
rosalind's
on
a
plane
and
we're
here
to
present
to
you
the
ordinance
associated
with
the
downtown
west
fund
committee.
L
I
know
you
remember
that
in
may
of
21
council
approved
the
downtown
west
project,
along
with
a
roughly
200
million
community
200
million
dollar
community
benefits
package
that
also
included
155
million
dollar
fund
to
assist
anti-displacement
and
opportunities
for
education,
training,
small
business
support
and
more
the
downtown
west
efforts
included.
Extensive
community
outreach.
L
The
governance
objectives
and
the
fund
framework
is
very
exciting.
It's
a
new
model
for
decision
making,
it's
one
that
leads
its
first.
As
far
as
we
can
see
in
the
nation
of
empowering
residents
of
impacted
communities,
the
fund
will
provide
an
opportunity
to
bridge
lived
experience
with
those
of
local
leaders
and
service
providers,
and
we
have
a
commitment
to
data-driven
work,
a
framework
for
establishing
and
evaluating
outcomes,
and
there
will
be,
as
mandated
specified
by
council
checks
and
balances
to
aid
in
transparency.
L
And
there
will
be
flexibility
that
governs
and
allows
the
committee
and
the
fund
manager
to
maximize
and
make
most
efficient
the
use
of
the
funds.
With
that,
I'm
going
to
turn
to
lori
to
detail
more
of
the
framework
and
the
ordinance
for
the
fun.
O
O
The
commission
will
have
13
voting
members,
including
at
least
five
members,
with
lived
experience
in
the
program
areas
that
the
fund
will
serve
as
well
as
eight
members
with
technical
expertise
in
relevant
fields.
The
commission
will
also
have
non-voting
members,
three
city
representatives
and
one
from
google,
with
the
option
to
add
additional
non-voting
seats.
O
O
So,
with
respect
to
terms
members
will
serve
four-year
terms
with
the
option
for
reappointment
for
no
more
than
two
consecutive
terms
of
the
13
initial
members.
Six
will
have
two-year
terms
to
start
which
will
enable
about
half
of
the
commission
to
turn
over
or
get
reappointed
every
other
year.
Staff
is
recommending
the
addition
of
an
alternate
member
that
can
serve
in
place
of
any
voting
member
as
needed
next
slide.
O
O
So
the
city
manager's
office
will
conduct
the
application
and
evaluation
process
for
the
membership
in
coordination
with
the
clerk
city,
attorney's
office
and
office
of
racial
equity.
The
city
manager's
office
will
then
recommend
a
slate
to
city
council
as
part
of
a
regular
meeting
and
staff
will
provide
all
qualified
applications
as
part
of
the
staff
report.
L
B
A
Thank
you.
My
name
is
mary
helen
dougherty
and
in
partnership
with
a
broad
coalition
of
faith,
labor
and
grassroots
community
partners.
We
are
grateful
and
excited
regarding
the
creation
of
this
fund.
In
addition
to
having
funding
readily
available
to
combat
displacement,
we
are
also
very
supportive
of
community
members
with
lived
experience
deciding
how
stabilization
fund
dollars
are
allocated.
A
M
Yes,
paul
soto
from
the
horseshoe
one
of
the
things
that
was
conspicuously
absent
from
the
discussion
was
a
representative
from
the
horseshoe
from
the
gardner
at
chicano.
I'm
not
talking
about
no
caucasian
or
no
asian.
I'm
talking
about
a
chicano
that
has
lived
in
that
area
that
was
conspicuously
absent
from
the
table.
You
got
somos
mayfair,
you
got
sb
rising.
You
got
working
partnerships
and
rebecca
armandos.
M
M
I've
sent
the
emails
to
the
city,
the
cities
in
possession
of
those
emails
that
were
that
were
generated
by
repercus.
She
admitted
to
it.
She
was
working
in
2016.
that
was
one
year
before
the
land
sale
to
google.
So
how
is
it
that
she
is
going
to
be
working
on
these
committees
in
order
to
make
this
deal
go
through
one
year
before
it
was
even
discussed
at
council?
M
The
reason
why
is
because
there
was
three
members
district
six
I
mean
district
three
district,
five
and
and
the
mayor
all
non-disclosure
agreement,
signatories
on
that
nondisclosure
agreement.
The
legitimacy
of
this
of
this
deal
is
in
question
and
it's
it's
gonna
get
challenged
because
you
have
no
representative
no
chicano
from
there,
but
you
got
everybody
from
the
east
side.
M
But
yet
google
is
going
to
be
literally
around
the
block
from
the
horseshoe
and
what
that's
going
to
do
is
it's
going
to
create
an
economic
pressure
on
the
chicanos
that
live
in
that
area
and
it's
going
to
constantly
it's
going
to
squeeze
them
out
and
that
has
not
been
discussed.
That
needs
to
be
put
on
this
table
and
if
you
don't,
then
you're
irresponsible.
E
Good
afternoon,
mayor
and
council,
my
name
is
wesley
castro
working
partnerships.
I'm
proud
to
stand
alongside
a
broad
coalition
of
faith,
flavor
and
grassroots
community
partners
to
express
our
excitement
for
this
really
monumental
opportunity
with
the
creation
of
this
fund,
along
with
having
dollars
readily
available
to
complete
to
combat
displacement.
We're
also
very
supportive
of
this
model
where
community
members
with
lived
experience
are
going
to
have
the
ability
to
decide
how
stabilization
fund
dollars
are
being
allocated.
E
In
that
spirit,
we'd
like
to
express
our
support
for
staff's
recommendation,
as
well
as
the
amendment
laid
out
in
council
member
crossbows
memo
to
allow
for
greater
participation
throughout
this
process
from
the
commission
that
will
be
overseeing
this
fund.
Thank
you
very
much,
and
we
very
much
look
forward
to
the
continuation
of
this
work.
E
Yes,
hi
good
afternoon,
my
name
is
leticia
alvarez
and
I
work
for
soccer
heart
community
service.
I'm
here
to
provide
comments
on
this
item,
and
I
just
want
to
thank
our
council
member
magdalena
carrasco
for
drafting
this
memo
and
then
also.
This
is
a
great
opportunity
for
the
community
to
have
their
voice
being
heard,
and
this
will
be
possible
to
this
advisory
committee.
So
they
are
very.
They
are
the
experts
when
it
comes
to
live
experience.
E
So
that's
why
I'm
very
grateful
for
this
memoir
and
I
urge
the
council
to
vote
in
favor
of
of
passing
this
memo.
Also
it's
time
for
for
the
city
of
san
jose
to
do
the
right
thing
in
favor
of
the
community,
which
is
just
moving
forward
with
this
and
very
excited
to
continue
working
with
the
community
and
see
these
members
applying
for
this
opportunity
of
being
part
of
the
advisory
committee.
Thank
you.
E
Good
afternoon
council,
this
is
alex
shore
executive
director
of
catalyze
sv
just
wanted
to
affirm
our
comments
and
support.
From
last
year,
around
the
community
engagement
components,
bringing
community
close
to
decision
making
and
dollars
is
such
a
good
practice
and
lots
of
praise
to
the
community
groups
who
advocated
for
this,
the
council
members
who
supported
it
and
the
city
staff
who's
moved
it
forward.
Just
an
outstanding
example
of
quality,
community
engagement
and
councilmember
carrasco's
memo
looks
good
too
so
like
to
see
that
and
supportive
of
that.
So
just
thank
you
again
to
staff.
E
You
know
there
are
plenty
of
meetings
where
we're
asking
for
you
for
things
or
critiquing
things,
and
we
just
also
like
to
come
and
make
sure
that
we're
praising
folks
when
they're
doing
great
work,
especially
when
it's
on
an
issue
of
such
importance
to
catalyze
this
vnr
members,
good
community
engagement
that
emphasizes
equity.
So
thank
you
so
much
council
staff
and
other
folks
in
the
city.
B
All
right
back
to
the
council:
let's
go
first
here
in
the
chambers,
councilman
davis.
K
Thank
you
mayor.
I
just
want
to
take
the
opportunity
to
thank
laurie
and
nancy
for
all
their
work
on
developing
this
trailblazing.
Commission
glad
that
we
we
have
got
here,
and
I
actually
absolutely
agree
with
the
with
the
public
comment
about
greater
gardner
needing
to
be
represented
on
this
on
this
commission,
and
I
know
that
we
will
continue
to.
O
Work
together
to
get
the
word
out
for
those
neighborhoods,
because
I
represent.
K
F
B
All
right
motion:
I
see
no
other
members
in
chambers
online.
I.
B
A
member
of
the
public
all
right:
let's
ask
that
member
of
the
public
come
forward
and
then
we'll
go
to
council
member
crosstalk.
K
So
this
total
fund
should
be
divided
into
like
for
newborn
babies
and
newborn
moms
k1
to
k-12
education,
community
college
education,
bsms
and
phd
students
who
are
reciting
san
jose
how
they
can
help
san
jose
city
or
communities
of
stabilization
opportunity.
So
it's
pretty
divided
evenly
or
according
to
the
population.
K
That's
my
request
so
that
from
newborn
baby
to
the
senior
citizens
and
people
who
are
struggling
for
end-of-life
solutions,
so
every
everybody
should
be
covered.
So
it's
called
a
cradle
to
grave
solutions.
A
For
council
members
online
at
crosstalk
arenas
both
with
hands
up.
F
Yes,
thank
you.
I
I
just
wanted
to
also
extend
my
gratitude
to
nancy
and
to
the
entire
team.
That's
been
working
on
this.
This
is
a
monumental
moment,
as
we
continue
to
move
forward
and
and
and
decide
the
future
of
san
jose
many
folks
who
are
very
interested
in
in
being
engaged
and
participating
and
contributing.
We've
heard
it
for
the
past
several
years.
F
Actually,
since
the
beginning
of
of
this
of
this
journey
and
and
that's
the
purpose
of
the
memo
that
I've
submitted
and
I'm
hoping
that
my
council
member
colleagues
will
will
support
continued
engagement
by
the
commission
who
who
don't
want
to
just
contribute,
but
they
want
to
be
part
of
crafting
and
guiding
the
the
commission
and
the
plan
for
the
city
of
san
jose.
F
I
just
wanted
to
thank
all
the
members
of
the
community
who
continue
to
stay
engaged
and
those
who
will
be
part
of
the
commission.
This
is
a
a
lot
of
very
important
work,
critical
work
for
our
downtown
area,
but
truly
as
it's
going
to
resonate
throughout
the
entire
city,
I'm
I'm
grateful
for
the
commitment.
Thank
you
mayor.
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
ns,.
P
Thank
you
mayor.
I'm
just
gonna
join
in
with
congratulating
staff,
our
community
members
and
everyone
who
contributed,
including
my
colleagues,
to
where
we
are
right
now,
and
so
this
is
wonderful
work.
This
is
great
work.
I
also
agree
that
there
probably
should
be
a
greater
level
of
participation,
representation
from
those
neighborhoods
that
are
going
to
be
impacted
the
most,
but
this
is
a
a
change
that
will
be
for
all
san
jose
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
did
earlier
this
week
were
or
gosh
was.
P
Was
it
last?
Oh,
my
gosh
for
neighborhood
services
committee,
which
I'm
and
that
is
to
we?
We
are
looking
at
the
proposed
equity
round
table,
and
this
was
where
this
is
a
committee
or
a
roundtable
advisory
committee
that
came
out
of
the
restructuring
of
the
human
services
media.
If
you
all
remember,
we
couldn't
get
forum
to
for
that
for
that
committee
and
it
hadn't
met
for
many
years,
and
so
sulma
massiel
from
our
office
of
race,
race
and
equity
has
been
leading
that
and
then
they've
done.
P
A
wonderful
job
presented
this
to
our
committee
last
week
and
one
of
the
things
that
that
they
found,
which
I
think
was
the
best
practice
within
some
of
the
committees
that
are
similar
to
that,
was
that
they
were
going
to
pay
a
and
the
stipend
that
they
decided
that
each
of
those
committee
members
would
have
especially
those
who
are
have
lived
experience
or
the
lived
experience
seat
that
they
would
be
able
to
receive
those
that
stipend,
regardless
of
whether
they
attended
the
meetings
or
not,
and
one
of
the
reasons
that
they
did.
P
That
was
because
they
understand
that
in
between
the
meetings,
there
is
some
feedback
that
is
needed
from
those
committee
members
or
advisory
members
and
and
that
work
should
also
be
recognized
whether
they
actually
make
you
know
officially
they
make
the
meeting
or
not.
Is
this
something
that
we
could
also
carry
over
into
this
group?
P
As
I
believe,
this
is
the
best
practice
that
our
office
of
race
and
equity
are
establishing
within
this,
this
advisory
group,
which
is
going
to
take
the
place
of
the
human
services
commission
and
I'd
love
to
tell
you
the
name
of
it,
but
they
haven't
come
to
that
decision
just
yet.
I
think,
but
don't
quote
me:
it's
going
to
be
san
jose
for
all.
L
P
L
And
mayor,
thank
you
very
much
for
the
question
this
year.
You
are
tapping
into
an
issue
that
was
very
much
a
subject
of
a
lot
of
discussion.
We
so
thank
you
for
that.
We
had
been
looking
at
the
models
that
were
already
established
in
the
city,
including
most
recently
council
had
worked
on
the
hcd
committee,
housing
community
development
committee
and
the
model
that
the
committee
used
was
for
attendance,
paying
the
200
dollars
and
it
was
a
200
amount.
L
So
we're
consistent
there
for
attendance
at
the
meeting
at
the
annual
sorry
monthly
meeting
in
acknowledgment
that
there
may
well
be
other
meetings
and
the
effort
which
is
substantial,
that
you're,
just
referencing
had
not
yet
been
under
discussion.
So
we
were
in
line
with
prior
work.
P
Yes,
I
am
I'm
asking
if
we
can
maybe
take
a
have
this
group
or
a
representative
connect
with
the
office
of
race
and
equity,
so
that
we
can
be
fair
to
those
committee.
Members
are
those
folks
who
we're
asking
to
attend
our
meetings,
especially
when
they
have
to
miss
out
on
some
work
or
have
to
be
away
from
their
home
and
have
to
take
public
transportation
or
just
even
gas.
P
These
days
is
very
expensive,
so
it
would
be
wonderful
to
have
a
standardized
way,
a
standardized
approach
to
stipends,
especially
for
those
advisory
groups.
Once
again,
thank
you
so
much
for
all
the
really
great
work.
I'm
really
excited
about
this
next
phase,
and
I
know
the
rest
of
our
our
community
is
too,
as
you've
heard.
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
davis
was
that
from
before.
Okay,
any
other
comments.
B
Okay,
I
I
just
wanted
to
say
I
thank
you
again
to
everybody.
Who's
been
working
collaboratively
on
this
effort,
certainly
lori
and
nancy,
but
also
so
many
in
the
community.
We
know
this
is
a
still
a
lot
of
work
to
do.
We
got
a
couple
years
before
this
thing
is
really
up
and
running,
but
I
think
what's
really
critically
important.
That's
been
accomplished
now.
B
Is
that
the
tone
and
and
the
dialogue
around
this
really
important
investment
in
our
city
has
changed
dramatically,
and
I
hope
that
we
can
see
that
by
all
pushing
together,
we
can
expand
a
lot
of
opportunity
for
an
awful
lot
of
our
residents.
Who've
been
struggling
without
enough
opportunity
for
too
many
years,
and
I
think
that's
really
positive
development
through
all
this.
So
I
look
forward
to
continue
to
to
push
together
and
and
make
this
work
worthwhile
for
everyone.
B
All
right,
finally,
8.2
is
our
master
agreement
or
set
of
master
agreements
for
community
engagement,
consultants,
nancy.
L
This
request,
as
the
mayor
already
mentioned,
what
is
for
council
approval
of
consulting
services,
not
only
consulting
services
but
in
addition,
other
resources
that
not
only
oed
but
other
departments
and
council
offices
can
take
advantage
of.
What
we're
specifically
recommending
to
you
today
is
adopt
a
resolution
authorizing
the
city
manager
to
negotiate
and
execute
up
to
nine
master
agreements
for
on-call
community
engagement
consultants
for
terms
through
the
end
of
june
2024
for
a
total
amount
of
compensation
spread
over
all
nine
or
four
million
dollars.
L
We're
also
asking
that,
if
needed,
that
the
agreements
could
be
extended
for
an
additional
two
years
and
that
we
negotiate
and
execute
amendments
to
the
master
agreements
to
shift
dollars
between
them
so
that
we
can
make
most
efficient
and
optimize
the
use
between
the
agreements,
and
that
would
be
the
under
the
authority
of
the
city
manager
and
you'll,
hear
a
little
bit
more
about
this
through
the
presentation.
But
we're
also
asking
that
staff
be
allowed
to
conduct
a
separate
procurement
process
for
establishing
a
bench
of
on-call
community-based
organizations.
L
O
O
O
Some
of
these
consultants
provide
all
of
the
services
listed
in
the
rfp,
while
others
specialize
in
a
subset.
So
these
services
include
assistance
with
community
advisory
committees,
meeting
facilitation
event,
planning
engagement
strategy
and
implementation,
communications
and
outreach
support,
needs
assessment
and
process
evaluation
next
slide.
O
O
L
The
other
piece-
that's
that's
important-
is
that
through
the
process,
we
we
recognize
that
it's
important
to
make
sure
that
cbos
and
non-profits
have
the
opportunity
to
do
this
work.
They
pro
they
provide
a
very
important
network
to
communities
that
they
are
most
affiliated
with,
and
we
believe
that
they
could
expand
their
offerings
if
given
the
chance
to
do
additional
work.
A
Q
Greetings,
my
name
is
carmen
gaines
and
I
work
as
the
associate
director
with
local
color,
a
non-profit
organization
uplifting
and
advocating
for
the
creative
communities
in
san
jose.
I
appreciate
the
privilege
of
participating
in
last
week's
meeting,
and
this
was
this
week's
meeting
to
comment
on
this
memo.
Q
However,
this
is
a
privilege
I
am
providing
comment
today
in
favor
for
another
bench,
specific
open
call
specifically
for
cbo's
and
nonprofits
the
work
we
do
already
exemplifies
the
power
of
community-based
organizations
to
reach
and
conduct
community
engagement
in
a
way
that
reaches
people
where
they
are
and
specific
areas,
and
also
the
unique
specific
areas
that
we're
already
in
touch
with.
Thank
you
for
the
collaboration
and
communication,
thus
far
in
considering
and
adding
this
memo
to
today's
agenda
and
considering
an
amendment
to
the
master
agreements
for
community
engagement
consultants.
Q
The
resources
this
contract
could
provide
would
have
a
rippling
effect
for
the
commonwealth
of
the
communities
that
we
are
already
in
deeply
engaged
with
and
will
provide
new
opportunities
for
us
to
grow
through
the
resources
of
a
master
agreement
contract.
These
comments
also
relate
in
favor
to
the
previous
agenda
item
1.8.1.
M
Yes,
paul
from
the
horseshoe,
I
want
to
thank
councilwoman
arenas
and,
and
carrasco
for
at
least
acknowledging
that
the
let
me
put
in
these
terms,
the
largest
latino
community
in
proximity
to
downtown
the
largest
latino
community
in
proximity
to
downtown,
has
primarily
chicanos
in
it
is
the
horseshoe.
M
That's
the
horseshoe
okay,
so
so
so
to
leave
this
barrio
out
and
a
representative
that
has
studied
the
redlining
documents
for
five
years.
I
have
all
of
them.
Five
years
I've
studied
the
economics
of
the
area.
I've
studied
the
sociological
impacts
of
the
area.
I
am
a
generational
descendant
of
that
area
and
sasi
puedes.
You
can't
get
a
better
informed
citizen
that
is
engaged
than
myself.
M
It
just
doesn't
exist
in
the
city,
there's
there's
over
260
000
mexicans
in
the
city
or
latinos
over
260
000,
and
there
isn't
one
person
that
is
doing
the
work
on
the
scale
that
I'm
doing
I'm
in
housing
issues,
land
issues,
parks
and
recreation,
the
jails,
the
police,
the
community
relations
with
the
police
department
and
the
community.
These
are
this
is
what
I
do
why
and
why
am
I
effective
in
doing
what
it
is
that
I'm
doing,
because
I
know
the
area?
M
I
know
what
it's
like
to
grow
up
in
systemic
racist
policies.
I
know
what
it's
like
to
experience
institutionalized
racism,
no
one's
going
to
teach
me
anything
about
that.
What
you
can
do
is
you
can
sit
down
and
be
taught
about
the
generational
impacts
of
all
of
those
policies.
But
it's
like
you
don't
want
that.
You
reject
that
and
because
you
reject
that
the
legitimacy
of
a
policy
is
rejected.
A
G
Sv
you
heard
from
our
executive
director
alex
shore
earlier
today.
We
are
very
happy
and
encouraged
to
see
the
progress
that
this
agenda
item
has
made.
Thank
you
so
much
to
the
oed
staff,
particularly
lori,
for
her
cooperation
and
transparency,
as
we've
explored
this
project
with
her
we're
very
happy
to
see
the
cbo's
and
the
nonprofit
community
considered
in
this
supplemental
item.
We're
very
excited
to
also
hear
the
updated
timeline
and
and
know
that
this
is
a
priority.
That's
going
to
be
fulfilled
this
year.
G
One
outstanding
question
that
I
do
have
is:
how
will
the
funding
for
the
cpos
and
nonprofits
compare
to
the
to
the
max
contract
amounts
that
are
being
provided
to
the
private
firms?
That's
one
piece
of
information
that
we
have
not
received,
but
other
than
that
we're
very
excited
to
continue
working
with
oeb
and
the
council
members
and
their
staff
on
increasing
community
engagement
and
representation
in
the
development
process.
G
A
Hello,
my
name
is
claire
kennedy
and
I'm
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
silicon
valley
council
of
nonprofits,
spcn
would
like
to
express
support
of
the
staff
recommendations
outlined
in
the
supplemental
memo
from
assistant
director
klein,
specifically
the
creation
of
a
bunch
of
community-based
organizations
to
assist
the
city
with
with
community
engagement
processes,
as
expressed
in
the
memo.
Svcn
also
believes
cbo's
can
help
engage
harder
to
reach
populations,
improve
credibility
of
processes
and
generate
more
equitable
outcomes
that
will
enrich
any
outreach.
The
city
wishes
to
pursue
in
the
future.
A
E
Hi,
my
name
is
giovanni
medina
and
I'm
just
a
representative
on
behalf
of
some
of
the
some
of
the
chicano
people
in
my
community.
I
just
wanted
to
be
a
second
voice
for
the
the
gentleman
earlier
speaking
on
horseshoe
and
thanks
sylvia
arenas,
because
it's
true
when
we
reach
out
it
seems
like
you
guys,
don't
listen
and
a
lot
of
times
I
get
cut
off
myself,
so
just
wanted
to
be
another
voice
for
them
and
thank
them
for
speaking
up.
That's
my
time.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
mayhem,.
H
Thanks
mayor
hi
nancy,
thanks
for
the
presentation
and
the
very
detailed
memos,
I
wanted
to
ask
about
the
additional
rfp
which
you,
which
you
talked
about
one
just
a
technical
question
is:
do
we
need
more
funding,
or
is
that
still
within
the
four
million?
I
wasn't
clear
on
that.
H
L
Thank
you
again
for
the
question.
In
the
in
the
first
process,
the
the
work
was
directed
to
consultants
and
cbo
nonprofits
and,
in
the
course
of
doing
the
rfp
work
itself,
we
found
that
non-profits
and
cbo's
who,
who
may
not
be
as
familiar
going
through
these
types
of
processes,
especially
the
city
requirements,
just
the
the
loading
the
the
process
in
on
badingo
has
some
challenge
to
it
in
and
of
itself
honestly
that
we
didn't
get
responses
that
were
successful.
L
H
It
and
then
how
do
we
evaluate
for
just
an
for
the
outreach
portion?
I
understand
there
are
a
lot
of
different
capabilities
we're
looking
at
here,
but
for
outreach.
Some
feedback,
I've
heard
from
my
constituents
is
sometimes
not
feeling
like
they've
been
reached
out
to,
and
obviously
our
office
does
our
best
to
do
that
when
we're
aware
that
staff
is
looking
for
community
input,
but
we've
we've
had
some
cases
recently
where
we
haven't
always
known
and
then
the
answer
from
staff
to
the
community
has
been
well.
H
We
we
reached
out
here's
the
list
of
non-profits
we
engaged
with.
So
how
do
we,
whether
it's
through
this
process
or
the
follow-up
and
I
earth
there-
was
reference
to
the
service
order
stage?
H
L
Thank
you
for
the
question
again,
there's
a
lot
in
what
you
just
mentioned.
We
had
a
great
example
with
work
that
was
done
on
downtown
west
and
the
extensive
outreach
really
did
hit
a
lot
of
people,
and
yet
there
were
people
who
did
not
feel
that
they
were
engaged.
L
So
that
is
an
ongoing
challenge.
There's
been
other
work
by
the
housing
department
in
the
department
of
planning
and
the
housing
element
and
other
pieces
that
are
now
modeling
and
pushing
how
to
get
to
more
people
and
more
efficiently
with
a
wide
range
of
possible
avenues.
Looking
at
data
sets
that
perhaps
we
could
make
available,
and
that
would
be
probably
for
the
larger
or
experienced
consultants,
but
also
how
can
we
build
capacity
by
doing
work
and
learning
from
it
through
the
cbos
and
non-profits?
L
H
Yeah-
and
that
leads
to
what's-
I
guess
probably
my
last
question
here,
which
is
just
obviously
we
need
a
range
of
capabilities
and
strategies
and
tactics
from
the
very
offline,
interpersonal,
promotoras
and
knocking
on
doors,
and
you
know
very
manual
outreach
through
personal
networks.
We
also
need
some
consultants,
who
are
best
in
class
at
using
digital
technology,
to
cast
a
really
wide
net
and
reach
people
where
they're
spending
a
lot
of
time.
I
couldn't
tell
from
the
memo
in
that
latter
category
really
for
either
it
wasn't.
It
didn't
seem
specific
enough
to
me.
H
I
I
at
least
it
didn't
answer
for
me.
The
question
of:
are
we
really
identifying?
Does
our
bench
include
that
wide
range
of
capabilities
at
a
very
high
level
of
quality
I
mean?
Are
we
confident
that
there
are
groups
in
here
that
can
make
really
great
short
form
video
content
or
can
run
online
advertising
campaigns
at
one
end
of
the
spectrum
or
can
do
the
very
offline
rooted
in
the
community
more
manual
outreach?
Do
we
feel
like
that
range
of
capabilities
is
really
represented
here.
L
Fortunately,
we
we
do
have
a
depth
and
breadth
of
providers
here
that
are
very
experienced
as
well
and
for
even
more
detail.
Laurie
may
you
want
to
respond
to
that.
O
Yeah,
I
would
say
that
the
the
nine
consultants
offer
a
wide
range,
I'm
looking
at
the
the
results
of
the
evaluation,
and
most
of
them
do
provide
all
of
the
services.
O
There
are
a
couple
that
really
specialize
in
certain
things,
so,
for
example,
emc
specializes
in
the
community
needs
assessment
and
they're
a
you
know
very
experienced
firm,
doing
really
interesting
surveys
and
detailed
work
in
that
realm.
So
a
lot
of
digital
work,
but
we
we
do
expect
these
consultants
to
to
implement
a
wide
range
of
methods,
and
sometimes
that
might
be
the
door-to-door
knocking.
It
might
be
more.
O
A
lot
of
the
times
we're
just
ending
up
having
to
move
too
quickly
to
really
do
the
robust
work
on
the
front
end
of
things
which
you
know.
Hopefully,
your
constituents
would
hear
be
more
likely
to
hear
about
it
if
we
were
able
to
get
in
front
of
them
earlier
on.
H
Okay
and
then
sorry,
I
promise
is
the
last
one
at
that
service
order
stage.
So,
based
on
what
I
just
heard,
I
assume
we
can
combine
different
consultants
who
have
different
strengths,
have
two
or
three
of
them
working
together
on
the
same
project.
Absolutely
what
have
we
learned
in
recent
years
about
setting
the
objective
success,
measures
that
help
us
ensure
that
when
we
do
execute
a
service
order
with
one
or
more
groups
that
they're
delivering
the
kind
of
impact
in
terms
of
community
engagement
that
we
want
to
see.
L
Also,
an
area,
we're
learning
and
very
much
paying
attention
to
what
gets
measured
gets
done,
and
so
it's
it
is
a
process
and
looking
and
working
with
the
multiple
departments
as
well
as
community
partners
in
in
what
is
the
goal.
What
are
what
is
our
objective
and
key
results
in
order
to
guide
us
for
those
service
orders.
J
Thank
you
thank
you
for
the
presentation,
lori
and
nancy,
and
I'm
just
going
to
follow
up
on
some
of
the
questions
that
council
member
mahan
had
so
you
had
mentioned
that
the
council
offices
could
hire
these
consultants
as
well.
What
would
be
the
process
for
that
and
how
would
we
know,
which
might
be
the
best
consultant
to
fit
our
particular
needs
at
that
time?
L
Thank
you
for
the
question.
Absolutely
council
office
would
allocate
funds
much
as
every
department
will
allocate
funds
and
lori
provided
in
the
information.
The
the
basis
of
the
applications
of
what
the
each
provider
would
build
by.
We
can
make
sure
council
offices
have
that
as
well,
so
that
there's
perfect
clarity,
transparency
before
you
would
embark
on
a
particular
effort.
L
J
And
will
there
be
easy
for
us
to
determine
which
of
these
nine
consultants,
or
maybe
the
cbo's
that
you
in
we
end
up
contracting
with
two
that
there
may
be
a
good
fit,
but
we
don't
know
which
one
to
look
to
so
will
it
be?
There
be
some
guidance
on
their
different
qualities?
What
they
specialize
in.
L
Yes,
we
we
have
written
material
that
highlights
and
gives
examples
of
the
work
the
firms
do
and
what
their
approach
is
and
lori
I'll
ask
to
respond
as
well.
Who
has
a
good
deal
of
experience
with
many
of
them
so
crafting
the
best
mix
will
be
something
that
our
office
can
help
with.
Okay,
great.
J
I
I
appreciate
that
I
really
see
that
hiring
one
of
these
consultants
could
be
really
beneficial
to
a
council
office,
especially
a
district
like
mine.
Currently
that
has
a
lot
of
affordable
housing
projects
coming
in
that
we
do
a
tremendous
amount
of
outreach,
but
the
outreach
we
do
is
this
neighborhood
in
that
neighborhood
in
this
neighborhood
and
it's
a
little
bit
scatter
shot.
J
We
try
to
stay
focused
on
the
area
that
we're
looking
at,
but
as
soon
as
we
bring
up
one
area,
then
another
area
wants
to
know
when's
the
community
outreach
in
that,
and
it
may
not
be
far
enough
along
but
to
even
have
a
community
meeting.
But
so
outreach
is
really
extremely
important
and
we
think
we
know
how
to
do
it
at
a
council
office,
but
we
we
don't
necessarily
so
it
will
be.
I
feel
very
beneficial
to
utilize
the
expertise
of
these
consultants.
N
D
Thank
you
mir.
I
had
some
questions
on
this,
particularly
so,
first
off
with
major
policy
proposals
like
tdm
strategy,
citing
policy
and
many
other
things
like
covet.
D
We
rely
heavily
on
our
nonprofit
partners
to
do
outreach
in
communities
that
are
typically
hard
to
reach,
and
just
some
of
them
that
come
to
mind
are
first
five,
the
franklin
mckinley
children's
initiative,
somos
mayfair,
and
so
many
more
so
communities
that
are
often
low-income
working
families
won't
necessarily
go
to
a
community
meeting
just
because
they
get
a
postcard
in
the
mail,
especially
from
an
organization
that
they
don't
know,
or
maybe
they
don't
trust.
D
Instead
of
setting
up
a
process
from
the
beginning
that
allows
our
cbo's
to
provide
us
with
their
specific
expertise
and
the
list
of
options
here
are
on
the
list
of
services
that
are
offered
are
community
advisory
committee
assistance,
public
outreach
and
community
engagement,
meeting
facilitation,
communications
and
producing
graphics
event,
planning
a
community
needs
assessment
and
evaluation
work,
and
so
you
know
during
covid
we
talked
a
lot
about
providing
capacity,
support
to
the
ngos,
the
very
ngos
that
we've
relied
on
so
much
so
this
could
have
been
a
great
opportunity
to
continue
to
support
cbo's,
and
so
I'm
trying
to
understand
that
process
a
little
bit
more,
especially
when
this
moves
so
quick.
D
The
rfp
bid
period
was
three
weeks
and
yes,
we
reached
out
to
community
leaders
to
sit
on
the
evaluation
panel,
but
no
one
responded
to
the
off
offer.
I'm
guessing
everything
was
very
fast
moving,
seeing
that
three
three-week
time
period.
D
So
can
you
address
how
the
thinking
about
not
including
the
cbos,
how
the
second
rfp
process
is
going
to
move
forward?
L
Councilmember,
thank
you
very,
very
much
for
the
question.
Originally,
what
we
set
out
to
do
was
include
consultants
and
the
cbo's
non
and
non-profits.
So
we
agree
with
you.
It's
really
important
to
include
community-based
organization
and
non-profits
in
the
efforts
with
the
city.
They
they
do
an
incredible
work,
in
fact,
in
many
instances,
they're
the
ones
who
know
their
communities
or
most
instances
very
much
the
best,
and
we
need
to
address
that
an
example
was
in
downtown
westwork.
L
We
did
have
consultants
who
had
done
a
lot
of
work
in
other
areas
and
provided
a
really
great
service
that
that
really
voted
well
and
did
well
for
the
community,
but
we
also
hired
seven
local
community-based
organizations
to
reach
into
their
organizations
or
their
networks
to
provide
assistance.
That
was
really
pivotal
groups
like
even
san
jose
jazz
or
the
aksa
or
somos,
mayfair
or
or
others.
We
totally
agree
with
you
that
capacity
building
for
our
community
based
organizations
and
non-profits
is
essential.
L
We're
using,
as
you
know,
in
d7-2,
we're
using
dollars
from
arp
to
fund
and
allocate
capacity
building
opportunities.
So
it
was.
L
We
didn't
want
to
to
not
have
cbo's
or
non-profits
achieve
the
the
points
necessary
to
be
included,
and
we
do
need
to
move
forward
quickly.
L
There
are
one
in
particular
group
that
we're
trying
to
move
forward
with
if
this
is
approved
by
council,
with
an
effort
from
one
of
the
consultants,
whoever
wins
or
gets
the
allocation
based
on
the
process
identified
to
you
just
a
few
slides
ago.
So
we
have
a
a
need
to
proceed,
but
we
also
very
much
agree
with
what
you
were
saying
about,
including
community-based
organizations
and
non-profits
for
multiple
reasons.
L
L
Oh,
maybe
I
misunderstand:
do
you
mean
wait
until
we
got
the
other
out
on
the
street
and
and
sorry.
D
I
my
ipad
just
died
and
then
came
back
so
why
didn't
we
combine
them?
Because
why
didn't
we
just
extend
the
period
it's
at
three
weeks.
It
moved
very
quickly,
there's
up
to
four
million
dollars
at
stake.
D
Why
didn't
we
just
extend
it
so
that
and
and
work
more
closely
with
our
cbo's.
L
Great
also
very
much
appreciate
the
the
reason
you're
out
or
I
believe
why
I
understand
the
reason
we
are
trying
to
move
forward.
Oed
has
specific
requirements
that
we
want
to
get
going
on
and
that
if
we
wait
much
longer,
we
we
will
miss
deadlines
that
are
important.
L
We've
been
told
there
are
others
in
the
in
the
city.
That
would
also
benefit
from
going
through
the
process
that
was
outlined,
and
you
know
we're
always
learning
and
we
didn't
think
the
process
was
difficult
for
cbo's.
L
We
normally
so,
for
example,
whenever
an
rfp
goes
out
council
member,
if
we
get
comments
from
anyone
who's
reading
it
in
the
process
of
they're
considering
applying,
we
have
definitely
in
the
past
gotten
comments
and
we've
extended
the
deadline,
for
example.
L
But
no
no
comments
came
to
us
either
about
the
timing
or
any
indicating
any
particularly
particular
difficulty
about
responding.
So
we
didn't
get
it
that
it
was
difficult
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
including
cbo's
and
nonprofits.
L
The
the
funding
can
either
be
allocated
from
the
four
million
dollars
and
then,
if
the
funding
dwindles
more
quickly,
we
come
back
to
council
and
or
it's
also
possible
for
us
to
establish
when
we
come
back
to
you,
its
own
pool
of
and
up
to
limit.
So
that
is
definitely
something
that
we
can
consider
in
in
both
ways
from
your
would
you
would
you
share,
which
way
you
would
prefer.
D
And
when
is
that
second
rfp
going
out,
I
missed
that.
L
So
no
problem,
so
we
are
targeting
by
midich
top
mid-october
and
then
we'll
have
the
pre-proposal
conference.
Before
that,
we
were
going
to
suggest
having
the
rf
out
for
a
month
to
give
a
bit
more
time
and
we're
also
very
much
open
to
hearing
people
or
non-profits
or
cbo's
share
what
timing.
They
believe.
That
would
be
beneficial.
D
So
just
a
couple
of
thoughts,
sort
of
immediately
and
one
is
that
the
timing
coincide.
So
this
what
what
is
before
us
today
goes
through
june
30th
2025
with
a
two-year
option.
Yes,
and
so
I'm
sure
my
colleagues
may
have
thoughts,
but
mine
are
that.
D
The
cbo
rfp
aligns
with
that
so
that
in
the
future
we
will
be
able
to
do
one
inclusive
of
all
and
my
preference
would
be
to
have
them
both
be
able
to
access
the
four
million.
The
same
four
million
that
we're
approving
today,
because
it's
up
to
four
million
and
then
and
then
we
can
add
to
that
at
a
later
date.
That
can
go
out
to
both
the
consultants
as
well
as
the
cbo's.
D
I
just
I
think
this
is
really
important
and
and
I'm
drawing
on
the
experience
of
the
past
two
and
a
half
years
where,
frankly,
council
offices
have
to
step
in
and
do
a
lot
of
on-the-ground
work
and
then
and
then
we
rely
on
our
cbo
partners
david.
You
might
want
to
mute
and-
and
we
rely
on
our
cbo
partners
on
on
the
past
two
and
a
half
years,
and
so
I
do
think
that
we
have
asked
them
to
help
us.
D
D
And
I
do
think
that
having
cbo's
and
businesses
and
the
consultants
out
there,
you
know,
frankly,
some
may
do
the
same
thing.
Others
may
do
something
better,
but
what
we're
approving
in
front
of
us
is
actually
a
menu
of
options
so
that
we're
approving
all
of
these
consultants
and
then
we
as
a
city
can
use
whatever
piece
on
the
menu
that
we
need,
and
so
it
shouldn't
we
shouldn't
have
to
differentiate
between
our
cbo's
and
our
consultant
partners.
D
And
so
I
do
do
we
need
to.
We
don't
need
to
amend
the
motion,
because
that's
what
you're
going
to
do
in
october,
correct.
D
Okay
I'll
support
the
motion,
but
we
this
really
does
need
more
partnership
with
our
cbo's.
That's
it
for
me.
Thank
you.
P
Thank
you
mayor.
I
really
appreciate
the
comments
of
council
member
esparza.
P
This
is
is
exactly
what
we've
been
asking
or
a
portion
of
what
we've
been
asking
for
our
staff
to
do
throughout
the
pandemics,
so
that
we
can
ensure
that
folks,
so
that
our
community
understood
what
services
are
available,
how
to
access
them,
how
to
stay
updated
with
the
most
recent
health
information,
guidance
and
restrictions,
and
so
I'm
surprised
that
that,
because
you've
heard
us
over
and
over
talk
about
this
for
the
last
two
and
a
half
years
that
that
this
would
come
to
us
after
the
fact-
and
so
I'm
I'm
happy
that
you're
going
to
have
this
second
proposal
in
october
to
include
some
of
our
cbo's.
P
I'm
I'm
really
concerned
that
some
of
these
consultants
aren't
from
san
jose,
which
is
something
that
I
I
thought
I
heard,
and
so
I
wanted
to
clarify
how
how
many
of
the
the
folks
that
will
be
on
on
tap,
if
you
will
how
many
of
those
are
familiar
with
our
city
are
in
our
san
jose
based.
L
Thank
you
for
the
question
I'll
turn
to
lori,
who
who
may
share
information
both
where
they're
from
and
others
who
have
worked
extensively
in
san
jose
might
be
relevant
as
well.
Lori
yeah.
O
Basically,
all
of
the
firms
are
bay
area
firms
and
they've
all
done
work
for
the
city
of
san
jose.
Three
of
the
nine
did
qualify
for
the
local
and
small
business
preference,
meaning
that
they
have
a
presence
in
san
jose,
so
local
to
the
city.
Yeah
a
couple
do
national
work
but
they're,
almost
mostly
bay
area
based
in
where
they
serve
so.
O
P
O
P
Nine
are
familiar
or
have
served
san
jose,
but
what
I'm
asking
is
if
they
are
in
san
jose.
P
P
O
P
Yeah,
I'm
just
you
know
this
is
disheartening,
because
this
is
something
that
many
of
us
have
been
asking
for
in
order
to
engage
in
our
community
in
a
more
meaningful
way
and
some
of
those
best
practices,
as
you
heard
throughout
the
pandemic,
have
been
one
is
to
be
place
based,
and
so,
when
you
are
where
people
need
you,
people
can
access
you
right,
and
so
this
pick
and
choose
cat
menu
of
services.
P
So,
for
me,
it
would
be
really
meaningful
to
have
not
when
ever
we
need
our
to
extrapolate
information
from
our
community
but
to
develop
relationships,
and
this
is
why
it's
so
important
for
our
cbo's
to-
and
I
think
for
for
me-
would
be
a
lot
more
meaningful
for
our
cbo's
to
be
the
ones
heading
this,
because
they
understand
our
community.
P
There
is
not
one
council
member
here,
maybe
with
the
exception
of
of
the
mayor,
that
knows
all
of
the
city,
and
that
knows
all
of
these
neighborhoods
throughout
the
city
and
that
at
any
moment's
notice
can
connect
with
some
of
these
folks.
And
so
that's
what
we're
asking
some
of
these
consultants
to
do.
P
And
for
me,
I,
I
would
have
potentially
given
some
feedback
around,
maybe
having
a
a
a
region
that
each
area
is
responsible
or
each
consultant
is
responsible
for
so
that
you
have
a
relationship
develop
with
that
community
and
those
cbo's
and
those
resources,
and
and
that
it
comes
from
a
best
practice
and
a
practice
that
we
know
that
has
been
effective,
especially
during
the
pandemic,
which
is
being
place
based
right
and
then
the
the
the
second
thing
is
is
those
are
being
relationship
based,
and
I
think
I
don't
know
who
it
is
that
mentioned
on
the
promotors
model.
P
But
that
is
part
of
what
we
I
had
asked
our
mayor
to
fund
and
it
got
funded
about
a
year
ago,
so
that
we
can
connect
with
our
community
in
a
very
meaningful
way,
as
we
all
recover
from
this
pandemic
and
from
the
pitfalls
of
the
pandemic.
P
We
know
that
this
is
a
a
model
that
works
with
our
community
that
I'm
frankly,
I'm
concerned
about
the
most.
I'm
not
concerned
about
the
people
that
tap
into
the
surveys
and
have
the
resources
to
understand
how
it
is
to
get
on
a
zoom
call.
I
mean
a
zoom
meeting
and
and
give
us
feedback,
because
those
are
the
people
that
we
normally
rely
on.
I
want
us
to
expand,
especially
if
we
are
investing
4
million
dollars.
P
I
I
expect
that
we
have
these
great
relationships
with
all
those
communities
that
are
struggling
and
the
ones
that
have
that
we
have
not
been
able
to
connect
with
in
the
past
and
I'll
remind
everybody.
P
I
know
that
you've
heard
me
say
this
before,
but
I'm
just
to
prove
this
add
something
to
this
point,
and
that
is
that
in
welch,
even
though
we
have
reopened
our
community
center
many
years
ago
or
more
than
four
years
ago
every
year
we
can
expect
to
have
some
classes
canceled,
because
people
don't
know
that
the
classes
are
happening
because
there
isn't
that
on-site
registration
that
is
needed
there
isn't
that
hand-holding
that
is
needed,
and
so
then
we,
what
we
have
to
do
our
offices
have
to
do,
is
connect
with
the
schools
nearby
and
talk
to
those
principals
and
to
that
faculty,
and
let
them
know
hey
your.
P
Our
kiddos
are
going
to
miss
out
of
great
recreational
and
camps
and
summer
camps.
If
we
don't
get
them
registered,
so
could
you
please
refer
some
families
over
and
that's
how
we
get
some
of
our
spots
filled
now,
not
every
we're
not
going
to
be
there
ever
each
and
every
time,
and
so
I
think
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
learn
from
our
lessons
and
build
that
into
this
upcoming
rfp
proposal.
P
That
will
that
we're
going
to
see
in
october,
especially
as
we
look
back
at
all
of
the
conversations
that
we've
had
around
outreach.
So
I
I'm
I'm
going
to
expect
to
see
some
of
those
needs
that
we've
expressed
on
behalf
of
our
community
really
addressed
in
this
rfp
in
this
upcoming
rfp
and
somehow
make
sure
that
these
two
segments
of
of
consultants,
whether
they're,
cbos
or.
P
Non-Cbos,
but
but
that
are
professional
facilitators
or
coordinators
or
whatever
it
is
that
their
their
company
is
focused
on
doing
but
and
that
there
is
a
true
partnership
between
those
two,
because
what
I'm
thinking
is
that
we're
going
to
render
what
we
want
from
the
people
that
we
choose
and
I
think
what
we're
doing
right
now
is
more
of
the
same.
L
Just
to
say
once
again
thank
you
and
we
we
do
agree.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
the
cbo's
who
are
very
expert
in
their
networks,
actually
get
paid
for
and
can
continue
to
get
benefit
of
capacity
building
through
the
work
and
or
other
resources
that
we're
able
to
to
direct
toward
them.
So
we
definitely
will
be
taking
in
the
insights
provided
by
council
and
including
in
the
rfp
as
it
moves
forward
and
then
comes
back
to
you.
B
Okay,
thank
you
I'll
offer
a
slightly
different
perspective.
I
guess
I
always
have
to
be
the
oddball.
I
I
appreciate
a
lot
of
the
comments
have
been
said
and
I
think
there's
real
value,
for
example,
and
what
we've
done
in
the
past
in
exploring
the
promotora
model,
I
think
that's
been
very
valuable
and
I
don't
doubt
that
consultants
are
often
helpful,
particularly
given
how
short
staffed
we
are.
We
know
it's
true
in
every
department.
B
I
guess
the
question
I
had
is:
is
there
any
hope
that,
among
this
consultant
pool
among
the
the
folks
that
we
have,
I
know
they
all
have
different
skills
and
specializations
and
so
forth?
But
is
there
any
hope
that
any
of
these
consultants
could
actually
help
us
to
exercise
the
muscle
to
get
stronger
internally
in
community
outreach?
B
So
that's
sort
of
the
question.
Let
me
just
tell
you
sort
of
the
underlying
bias
in
all
that
which
is,
in
my
view,
I
am
concerned.
My
bias
is
that
I'm
concerned
about
an
approach
that
says
for
the
city
to
go
communicate
effectively
with
its
residents.
We
need
to
go
hire
somebody
our
job
is
to
serve
our
residents,
and
I
know
we
all
take
that
job
very
seriously.
All
of
us
and.
B
We
get
paid
to
serve
our
residents.
That
means
we
have
to
communicate
with.
Our
residents
means
we
need
to
listen
to
our
residents
and
all
those
things
are
things
that
I
know
we
do,
but
we
don't
always
do
them
well
or
perfectly.
You
know,
there's
always
challenges
and
all
that,
and
I
know
that
at
times,
look
as
we're
all
trying
to
move
very
fast
and
we're
all
understaffed
that
means
sometimes
balls
are
dropped
or
or
communication
is
missed,
with
critical
communities.
B
That
should
be
heard,
and
I
I
guess
I'm
worried
that
we
develop
a
pattern
of
dependency
on
other
folks
to
go
talk
to
our
residents
for
us
rather
than
strengthening
the
muscle
internally,
so
that
in
every
key
department
that's
public
facing.
We
know
it's
not
true
in
every
department,
I'm
not
expecting.
L
Mayor
lori
might
also,
but
let
me
let
me
have
a
comment,
but
let
me
start
out,
I
I
believe
it's
a
personally
from
experience
on
downtown
west
and
other
intense
community
outreach
and
engagement
efforts.
It's
a
both,
and
so
I
think
it's
really
important
that
city
staff
understand
and
be
thoughtful
and
strategic
and
respectful
about
the
communities
that
we're
trying
to
reach
out
to,
and
I
I
think
we
are
learning
we.
We
brought
on
laurie
in
great
part
for
the
community
engagement
effort.
L
She
she
helped
very
much
work
in
partnership
with
communities
directly
as
well
as
bringing
on
consultants
who
would
expand
that
reach.
So
it
was
definitely
a
hand
in
glove
effort
and
her
skill
set
has
supported
efforts,
for
example
on
the
housing
element.
Another
pd
related
outreach
effort
so
that
we
we
are
doing
both.
L
At
the
same
time,
we
are
building
internally
resources
to
understand
the
need
and
plan
it
out
further
because
it's
not
a
last-minute
thing
to
do
it
well,
and
it
does
take
more
resources
for
for
council
to
invest
in
those
efforts.
L
So
so
again,
I
I
think
it
is
a
both
and
with
the
recognition,
just
the
fair
recognition
that
you
know,
as
I
believe
councilman
morena
says.
If
we're
from
the
city,
we
may
not
be
as
trusted
as
from
someone
who's
from
a
cbo
or
non-profit
in
those
areas.
So
just
recognizing
how
to
be
most
effective.
O
Yeah
I'll
just
say
when
I
started
at
the
city
four
years
ago,
I
was
not
a
community
engagement,
specialist
and
I've
gone
through
a
bit
of
a
boot
camp
and
leading
the
dear
dawn
efforts,
and
I
really
see
there's
just
a
need
for
all
kinds
of
resources,
whether
it's
dedicated
staff
that
can
really
learn
community
engagement
and
be
that
coordinator
on
behalf
of
the
city
and
be
that
point
person
with
the
public.
But
our
consultant
teams
just
really
bring
a
lot
of
value
to
the
table.
O
They
are
able
to
do
a
lot
of
the
grunt
work
that
actually
enables
staff
to
have
more
direct
communication
with
the
public.
You
know
if
I
had
to
spend
all
my
time
writing
the
meeting
summaries
and
doing
kind
of
the
behind
the
scenes
work.
I
wouldn't
be
able
to
call
up
our
stationery
advisory
group
members
and
develop
that
one-on-one
relationship.
O
So
it's
really
a
team
effort
and
our
consultants
bring
in
a
lot
of
ideas
and
experience
from
other
cities
and
they
teach
us
a
lot.
I
really
I
totally
empathize
with
the
sentiment
of
building
our
own
muscles
for
this,
and
I
do
think
consultants
and
cbo
partners
can
teach
us
a
lot
and
we
can
teach
them.
We
can
build
capacity
together.
O
You
know
we
we
learned
so
much
from
the
remy
team
in
in
the
deodon
work,
and
you
know
part
of
the
scope
of
services
for
this
rfp
that
we
just
put
out
did
include
evaluation
of
process
because
being
able
to
reflect
on
what
went
well
and
what
didn't
and
what
we
can
carry
forward
and
what
we
shouldn't
needs
to
be
more
a
part
of
our
our
norm,
and
so
one
of
the
scope
of
services
was
to
actually
have
evaluation
capacity
to
be
able
to
drill
in
on
what
are
those
metrics
of
success.
O
L
N
Yes,
I
did
and
really
appreciate
the
conversation
from
everyone,
and
I
did
want
to
re-address
some
of
the
the
council
discussion
on.
You
know
what
happened
during
the
pandemic
and
would
certainly
agree
with
council
member
mayhem
and
needing
to
broaden
the
tools
and
avenues
we
use
and
who
we
reach
out
to
it's.
You
know
we.
We
live
in
a
very
diverse
city,
which
is
great,
and
it
requires
a
lot
of
different
avenues
and
tools
to
reach
our
residents,
which
is
good.
N
You
know
the
direction
the
council
member
uranus,
you
brought
up,
which
is
very
important:
the
promotorus
and
the
resources
that
we've
received
around
recovery,
which
is
you
know,
rosalind,
hughie
and
rob
lloyd
in
our
office,
with
irelia
bailey
and
carlos
velasquez,
being
able
to
have
those
resources
to
the
mayor's
point
where
we're
building
internal
muscle
and
really
practicing
in
the
recovery
effort
and
and
not
just
for
recovery.
But
we
also
view
that
the
manager's
office
is
for
the
organization
as
well,
because
it
is
a
tool
that
we
need
to
strengthen
flex
and
practice.
N
More
often
so
as
part
of
that
and
part
of
rosalind's
work
in
the
recovery
effort
is
to
build
out
a
roadmap
for
us
internally
around
community
engagement
and
community
outreach.
So
the
departments
have
these
tools.
These
resources
and
part
of
that
is
going
to
be
her
first
training
with
senior
and
executive
staff
in
the
city
in
october,
around
civic
engagement
and
some
of
the
lessons
learned
from
that
recovery
process.
N
So
the
departments
can
start
moving
in
some
of
these
directions
because
I
do
think
yes,
it
is
a
tool
that
we
need
to
strengthen
here,
but
it's
also
a
very,
I
would
say,
nimble
and
growing
area
that
we
need
to
be
better
as
an
organization
on
pivoting
and
being
okay
with
practicing.
N
You
know
making
some
mistakes
and
moving
on.
So
that
is
a
body
of
work
that
we
continue
to
do
and
we're
happy
to
report
out
on
those
efforts,
as
we
continue
to
learn
thanks
lee.
B
Yeah,
I
appreciate
everyone's
responses
here
and
I
think
this
case,
where
you
know,
nobody's
wrong.
I
appreciate
everyone
saying
I'll.
Just
articulate
two
concerns
that
I
think
we
may
hear
from
the
community
down
the
road
at
some
point.
One
concern
is
hey.
You've
you've
got
to
go
hire
this
consultant.
What
the
hell
are
you
guys
for
right,
which.
B
B
I
think
if
we
get
too
attached
to
one
approach,
that
could
be
a
problem.
So
I
appreciate
what's
been
said
about
the
fact
that
there's
learning-
because
hopefully
this
is
helping
our
organization
to
learn
so
that
we
are
expanding
our
capacity
and
it
doesn't
become
simply
a
dependence
on
the
consultant
industrial
complex.
B
The
the
second
concern
we
just
want
to
take
latest-
and
this
is
not
meant
to
disparage
any
particular
nonprofit,
because
we
know
nonprofits
are
doing
great
work
in
our
communities
are
carrying
an
extremely
heavy
burden
in
many
instances.
B
But
we
know
occasionally
that
the
lines
can
blur
between
the
service
work,
that
nonprofits
are
doing
and
political
activity
or
or
advocacy
in
different
ways,
and
we
expect
non-profits
to
advocate
in
lots
of
ways
that's
part
of
their
role.
We
get
it
but
because
those
lines
can
blur
it
can
also
mean
that
there
can
be
credibility,
issues
about
well,
it's
this
non-profit,
not
that
profit
and
nonprofit,
and
they
have
this
perspective
and
they
left
out
that
community,
and
so
I
just
want
us
to
be
really
sensitive
about
the
fact
that
we
are
the
city.
B
We
are
the
ones
who
are
supposed
to
be
representing
our
community
first
and
foremost,
and
certainly
we
need
the
help
of
lots
of
community
partners,
and
I
think
I
really
commend
how
staff
have
been
open
to
that
and
try
to
experiment
different
ways.
But
I
just
wanted
since
they're
kicking
me
out
of
here
in
a
couple
months,
because
I
just
don't
want
to
offer
a
cautionary
word-
that
that
we
can
go
too
far
down
this
path
and
it
can
become
problematic.
So
anyway,
leave
it.
There,
counselor
jimenez.
C
Yeah,
thank
you.
Man
appreciate
all
the
comments.
I
agree
with
much
of
what
was
said
also
thanks
to
councilmember
mayhem
for
articulating
some
of
the
concerns
that
I
had
I,
I
guess
I
have
a
one
main
question
for
nancy,
and
that
is
how
how
is
it
uncommon
or
how
common
is
that?
I
don't
see
it
too
often,
I
guess
in
which
we
see
a
breakdown
of
the
results
of
the
rfp.
So
I
know
that
in
the
memo
there
is
a
break.
C
Well,
maybe
one
of
the
attachments
to
the
memo
there's
a
breakdown
of
what
the
final
scoring
was,
but
I
know
there's
different
percentages
allocated
for
different
things,
say:
diversity,
inclusion
or
whatever
that
category
was,
would
it
you
know?
Would
you
consider
releasing
or
making
known
a
little
bit
more
detail
as
it
relates
to
the
results
of
the
rfp
next
time
around,
or
even
you
know
related
to
this
issuance.
L
Council
member,
thank
you
for
the
question.
Certainly
our
staff
lori
and
I
or
laurie
can
join
you
and
walk
through.
There
was
some
information
describing
high-level
report
out
23
applications.
The
number
of
folks
who
were
who
met
all
the
qualifications
who
were
interviewed
and
those
who
actually
are
being
recommended.
L
So
some
of
that
information
is
definitely
provided
and
we
there
isn't
anything
about
the
information
that
isn't
public,
and
we
also
want
to
be
mindful
that
if
we
were
bringing
every
single
score
to
council,
there
might
be
a
lot
of
discussion
that
would
bog
down
about
why
someone
got
a
nine
instead
of
a
10
on
a
particular
section.
C
Right
yeah,
I
can't
imagine
that
that's
a
good
point.
I
just
I
guess
I
I
thought
that
as
folks
were
posing
their
questions,
it
seemed
to
me
that
maybe
having
a
little
bit
more
of
that
detail
say,
for
example,
how
x
you
know,
organizations
scored
on
the
equity
inclusion,
or
you
know
things
of
that
nature
right
or
the
small
business
you
know
so
say.
For
example,
if
you
can
allocate
you
know
10
10
of
the
score:
did
they
score?
Did
they
get
five
percent?
There
did
they
get
three
percent?
C
And
so
I
don't
know
I
I
just
I
think,
based
on
what
I
heard
that,
having
a
little
bit
more
of
that
information
made,
I
think,
in
my
mind,
help
alleviates
some
of
those
just
how
folks
are
scoring
in
certain
areas,
but
anyhow
that
was.
I
just
wanted
to
express
that.
But
thank
you
for
all
the
work.
I
appreciate
it.
D
Yeah,
no,
I
I
raised
it
again,
okay,
so
I
had
a
couple
of
questions
and
actually
a
statement
as
well
is
I
agree.
I
I
think
that
we,
this
is
a
muscle
that
we
need
to
develop
more
as
a
city
and
after
two
and
a
half
years
of
covid,
where
we've
been
stretched
beyond
all
our
limits,
whether
it's
translations,
whether
it's
getting
out
into
neighborhoods,
that
need
it.
D
The
most
excuse
me
we
have
relied
on
or
the
census
we've
relied
on
others
to
do
that
and
ultimately,
in
our
census,
we
brought
in
our
own
folks
our
own
city
staff,
to
go
out
into
neighborhoods,
but
I'd
like
to
add
that
it
took
a
couple
of
council
members
to
do
that.
D
It
took
councilman
carrasco
and
myself
to
jump
up
and
down
to
get
into
what
the
issues
were
and
the
response
rates
and
parts
of
our
city
that
we
missed
and
the
county
missed
right
and-
and
this
is
part
of
the
equity
discussion
when
we
brought
it
up
in
2019-
is
you
know,
and
I'm
gonna,
I
believe
councilmember
perales
and
I
were
there
that
day
at
rules-
and
you
know
most
of
my
district
is
high
needs
right.
So
I'm
asked
to
help
on
community
outreach
on
rhodes
projects
on
coveted
census.
D
You
know,
library
concerns
right,
a
variety
of
things
and
that's
me
and
my
staff,
and
so
yes,
it
is
a
muscle.
We
need
to
learn
on
the
city
more,
but
it
falls
on
districts
like
three
five
and
seven
to
go
out
and
be
more
of
that
bridge.
It
puts
enormous
pressure
on
us
to
do
that,
and
so
why
don't
we
develop
our
cbo
nonprofits?
D
D
If
we
have
some
cbo's
out
there,
that
are
experts
in
graphics,
go
for
it
go
apply,
I'm
guessing
that
we'll
have
more
on
public
outreach
on
meeting
facilitation,
but
who
knows
right,
and
so
so
I
personally
don't
feel
we
have
the
staff
at
the
city
to
do
that,
and
maybe
we
should
add
that
in
the
next
budget,
if
this
outreach
is
so
important
to
us
as
a
city
that
we
add
those
staff
to
focus
on
outreach.
D
But
what
we
have
before
us
is
a
contract
to
work
with
consultants
and
hopefully
cbo's
in
october,
to
do
that
work.
I
had
a
question
on
the
training
in
october.
D
Excuse
me
for
senior
staff:
can
you
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
that
training
and
how
that
training
will
impact?
How
let's
say
d.o.t,
does
community
outreach
for
transportation
projects
or
how
they
plan
their
projects?
Can
you
talk
about
that
a
little
bit
more,
please.
N
Council,
member
esparza
lee
wilcox
assistant
city
manager,
I
can't
speak
specifically
about
d.o.t,
with
the
direction
that
rosalind
huey
has,
along
with
the
recovery
team,
is
to
take
all
the
civic
engagement
that
we
had
used
in
the
emergency
operations
center
and
now
part
of
the
recovery
task
force
and
build
out
a
more
formal
proposal
and
training
regiment
for
senior
executive
and
frontline
staff
about
where
we
need
to
move
to.
So
that
is
the
direction
that
and
the
direction
that
jennifer
and
I
have
given.
But
how
and
what
that
training
looks
like.
D
So
my
request,
for
that
would
be
because
as
much
as
I
deeply
respect
all
the
folks
on
that
team,
I'm
I'm
guessing
that
john
ristow
isn't
going
to
personally
plan
each
project
city-wide,
but
and
I'm
not
picking
on
d.o.t.
That's
just
an
example,
so
that
what
we
do
is
educate
on
how
to
plan
for
outreach.
D
If
we
had
wanted
community
leaders,
maybe
we
reach
out
to
them
as
soon
as
we
open
up
the
rfp
right,
how
we
work
together
on
projects
out
in
the
community
that
we
talk
about
how
to
partner
with
school
districts,
with
the
schools
in
our
communities
with
the
faith
groups
in
our
communities
and
knowing
that
each
part
of
our
city,
you
know,
has
its
own
unique
flavor,
but
how
to
account
for
that
in
the
planning
stages,
so
that
you
know
outreach
doesn't
become
something
that
we
sort
of
tack
on
at
the
very
end,
but
we
plan
for
it
in
the
project.
B
Thank
you
and
councilmember
arenas.
You
also
had
your
hand
up
is
that
from
before.
P
This
is
a
topic
that
that
is
just
absolutely
important
as
you're
hearing
many
of
us
who
contributed
during
the
many
conversations
around
the
pandemic
and
how
communities
were
being
impacted
and
just
living
through
that
for
two
and
a
half
years
I
think
is
this
is
the
reason
why
I'm
you
know
on
the
edge
of
my
seat
here.
Thinking
about
how
do
we
incorporate
all
of
those
lessons
learned
so
that
we
can
have
what
we
need
for
our
community
and
not
only
for
obviously
for
staff
as
well?
P
We
don't
have
the
folks
that
we
want
on
board.
We
don't
have
as
many
we
have
some
vacancy
rates,
and
so
we
know
that
we
need
the
support,
but
we
we
also
know
that
we
we
need,
we
need
to
connect
with
our
community
in
a
meaningful
way
and
not
have
it
just
be
a
check
off,
and
so
for
me,
I'd
love
to
see
this
come
back
before
it
is
before
the
rfp
is
released,
or
if
we
can
work
on
this
offline,
because
I
what
I
don't.
P
What
I
want
to
avoid
is
having
this
conversation
in
october
once
again
or
in
november,
and
that
we
are
surprised
with
some
of
the
results
that
we
have
if
we
haven't,
if
there's
any
way
that
we
can
assist
in
building
that
for
success,
whether
it's
having
those
conversations
with
some
of
those
partners
that
councilmember
esparza
was
talking
about,
or
maybe
just
outlining,
some
of
the
folks
that
that
typically
get
missed.
I
mean
you
know
just
having
these
these
conversations
that
we
can
build
out.
P
This
second
have
not
not
only
for
our
cbo's,
but
for
what
we
have
witnessed
as
an
agency
that
is
needed
for
our
community,
because
I'd
love
to
see
trainings,
not
not
just
for
executive
staff,
but
but
unlike
an
ongoing
outreach
training
that
is
offered
year-round
to
all
of
our
staff,
including
council
council
staff,
that
this
is
one
of
the
major
duties
that
we
have
is
to
connect
with
those
with
folks.
P
And
you
know,
most
of
our
offices
are
four
to
five
people,
and
so
we
have
to
be
very
effective
in
the
way
that
we
reach
out
to
others.
And
so,
if
there's
ways
that
we
also
can
improve
and
standards
that
we
can
set
amongst
not
only
our
council
staff
but
among
departments
that
that's
something
else
that
we
should,
we
should
also
be
discussing
so
so
anyways,
I'm
hoping
that
we
can
bring
this
back.
Is
there
any
way
that
we
can
bring
this
back
before
it
gets
solidified
and
released
in
october.
L
I
staff
will
definitely
work
on
a
strategy
so
that
we
can
include
review
with
the
council
so
that
input
so
there's
clarity
and
that
once
the
rf
does
go
out
council
member
that
each
office
would
have
it
so
that
you
can
extend
to
your
networks
as
well.
P
P
So,
while
we
also
develop
our
own
skills
outs
or
continue
to
develop
our
skill
sets
with
the
latest
trends
and
and
best
practices
that
we
also
ask
for
help
from
the
folks
who
are
doing
this
out
there,
because
we're
already
relying
on
these
on
these
people.
P
So
I
look
forward
to
seeing
what
this
this
next
iteration
of
this
looks
like
and-
and
I
just
appreciate
all
the
really
good
conversation
that
we've
had
so
far.
B
All
right,
thank
you.
Any
other
comments.
P
Excuse
me
mayor
and
do
I
need
to
ask
for
a
friendly
amendment
to
bring
this
back,
or
is
this
something
that
could
just
be
brought
back.
A
A
A
A
Okay,
I
have
public
speakers
in
person.
The
first
one
is
chris
and
then
followed
by
perry.
So
just
come
down
to
the
microphone.
K
I'm
happy
to
hear
a
few
comments
about
outreach
to
the
community,
I'm
from
one
of
the
communities.
My
name
is
chris
bang
and
I'm
a
resident
of
the.
K
Our
community
is
a
little
bit
concerned
about
at
least
the
members
of
our
community
that
I'm
most
closely
associated
with
are
quite
concerned,
and
that
is
our
knowledge
of
some
type
of
a
pattern
now
through
the
city
that
we
are
creating
these
poles
along
the
bicycle
lanes.
K
For
supposedly
protection
of
bicyclists,
we
have
that
ongoing
in
our
community,
specifically
along
branham
lane
and
from
what
I've
been
able
to
determine.
K
There
are
more
significant
negatives
to
these
poles
that
guard
these
bicycle
lanes.
Then
there
are
positives.
K
K
K
K
K
K
I
M
Yes,
paul
soto
from
the
horseshoe
I'm
reading
from
a
letter
that
was
issued
by
councilwoman
arenas
february
13th
of
2021
paul
identifies
and
keeps
tracks
of
issues
that
have
perpetually
suppressed
our
latino
communities,
such
as
land
use,
past
land
use
policies
were
racist,
yet
were
systematically
discriminated
against
people
of
color.
There
are
issues
that
impact
race
that
are
more
subtle
and
nuanced
than
say:
police
use
of
force,
paul's
ability
to
identify
these
issues
and
integrate
his
perspective
have
allowed
for
our
council
to
hear
the
result
of
systemic
racism.
M
Paul
brings
his
experience
growing
up
in
a
gang-impected
area
of
san
jose,
like
many
of
us
to
point
out
on
how
chicanos
are
segregated
and
suppressed
and
tied
back
to
policy.
He
literally
brings
san
jose
history
to
life.
I
am
immensely
grateful
for
his
perspective
and
his
knowledge
of
san
jose
history.
His
advocacy
has
created
opportunities
for
me
as
a
council
member
to
point
out
the
ramifications
of
policies
on
latino
community.
He
obviously
reads
our
council,
our
council
and
committee
memos
ahead
of
time,
as
well
as
conducts
his
own
research,
to
provide
very
succinct
commentaries.
M
M
M
C
Hi
well,
beekman.
I
hope
you
can
hear
me
okay,
I
guess
I
thank
you
to
paul
and
his
words
and
his
work
nice
to
hear
we
had
to
say
today
also
a
thank
you
to
the
first
public
speaker,
whose
words
reminded
me
of
the
importance
that,
as
we're
building
a
feature
of
community
safety
and
bicycle
safety
and
5g
issues,
you
know
and
bridging
the
digital
divide
as
important
as
those
things
are.
C
C
C
So
good
luck
on
those
efforts,
a
quick
reminder
of
a
good
meeting
yesterday
on
on
the
future
of
gun
issues,
how
to
address
the
use
of
guns
in
the
future
of
san
jose
and
what's
around
the
use
of
guns
in
san
jose,
just
a
reminder,
I
really
really
feel
that
there
can
be
important
public
oversight
from
you
know:
the
community,
that's
angry
at
the
gun,
fees
and
things
at
this
time.
The
public
oversight
they
can
provide.
It
just
introduces
a
good
way
to
be
a
full
community
process
in
our
future.
C
So
good
luck
in
the
how
to
we
can
work
towards
those
good
efforts
and
a
final
reminder
again
that
I
really
really
hope
that
all
sides
can
want
to
negotiate
a
peace
in
the
ukraine
area
at
this
time
there
is
openings
to
do
that.
Let's
find
the
ways
to
do
that
together
and
not.
G
Hi,
I'm
here
to
voice
my
concern
about
the
proposed
noble,
eih
site.
I
want
to
echo
what
all
my
fellow
neighbors
have
been
saying
that
this
is
not
an
appropriate
location
for
an
eih
to
strip
the
community
members
of
established
and
loved
parkland
and
build
an
eih
site
across
the
street
from
two
elementary
schools
would
be
a
huge
disservice.
G
No
other
existing
or
proposed
site
has
comparable
issues.
In
addition,
I
plead
with
the
council
to
increase
the
transparency
in
the
search
process
in
the
august
3rd
rules
meeting.
We
were
told
that
we
would
have
an
update
by
today,
yet
we
are
now
being
told
to
wait
until
october
25th
and
we
have
not
received
any
updates.
G
E
Hi,
my
name
is
giovanni
medina.
I
just
wanted
to
you
know.
Second,
a
voice
be
another
voice
again
for
paul
from
horseshoe
earlier
and
then
at
that
I
wanted
to
speak
on.
E
You
know
my
own
behalf
now
and
just
you
know
I
just
you
know
I
agree
with
like
gun
safety,
but
I
just
I
can't
agree
with
picking
on
gun
owners.
I
think
that
there
has
to
be
a
way
to
get
everybody
involved
and
not
just
pick
on
responsible
gun
owners,
it's
infringing
on
our
constitutional
rights.
That's
all
I
got
thank
you.