►
Description
City of San José, California
Community & Economic Development Committee of November 22, 2021
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=897413&GUID=043F8EA2-2F1A-40E8-9CCF-77594FD28370
A
A
A
B
A
D
B
E
E
E
Since
2004
the
san
jose
mchenry
convention
center
and
several
other
city-owned
facilities
have
been
operated
on
the
city's
behalf
by
team
san
jose
incorporated.
Additionally,
since
2009
team,
san
jose
has
operated
the
san
jose
convention
and
visitors
bureau
at
the
city
auditor's
office
under
the
terms
of
the
management
agreements
between
the
city
and
team,
san
jose
is
required
to
perform
an
annual
performance
on
it
to
determine
whether
and
how
well
team
san
jose
achieved
agreed
upon
performance
targets
that
are
the
basis
for
incentive
payment
from
the
city.
E
The
coveted
19
pandemics
had
a
large
impact
on
team
san
jose's
activities.
In
march,
16
2020
santa
clara
county
issued
a
shelter
in
place,
order
providing
that
individuals
could
only
leave
their
residence
to
perform
essential
activities.
All
events
at
team,
san
jose
managed
facilities
were
cancelled
for
the
rest
of
fiscal
year,
2019-20
and
all
of
fiscal
year.
2020
2021..
E
E
E
As
I
noted
a
moment
ago
because
of
restrictions
related
to
covet
19
teams,
now
they
did
not
have
any
events
within
his
facilities
for
fiscal
year,
2020
2021..
As
a
result,
team
san
jose
did
not
meet
his
adjusted
targets
for
the
following
performance
areas:
gross
operating
results,
estimated
economic
impact,
theater,
theater,
occupancy
and
customer
satisfaction.
E
In
fiscal
year,
20
20,
21
team
san
jose
booked
nearly
83
000
hotel
room
nights,
which
was
above
its
adjusted
target.
However,
overall
team
san
jose's
weighted
incentive
fee
score
fell
below
100
because
of
not
beating
the
other
targets
and
based
on
the
adjusted
targets
team
center,
they
did
not
qualify
for
the
incentive
fee
of
250
000.
E
F
E
E
A
Great
thank
you.
Thank
you
joseph.
I
want
to
thank
you
and
your
team
are
always
a
pleasure
to
work
with
and
you're
very
thorough,
and
I
always
find
your
reports
incredibly
insightful
in
terms
of
the
data
and
how
you
present
it.
So
I
just
want
to
thank
you,
and
I
also
want
to
thank
caroline
worden
as
well.
Who
is
the
the
lead
on
this
with
you
in
response
to
your
recommendation,
the
administrative,
the
administration
absolutely
agrees,
and
thank
you
again
for
for
identifying
that.
A
I'm
really
pleased
to
let
you
know
that
that
payment
has
been
received
already
by
team
san
jose.
So
that's
always
a
nice
thing
to
come
to
these
types
of
meetings
and
let
you
know
that
that
has
been
resolved.
I
also
want
to
thank
team
san
jose
for
their
good
work.
I
know
that
this
has
been
a
difficult
time
for
your
organization,
as
you
haven't
been
able
to
book
events,
but
I
just
want
to
applaud
you
for
doing
your
own
pivot
as
well,
and
you've
been
doing
a
lot
of
great.
A
B
Thank
you,
carrie
and
thank
you
joe,
and
thank
you
to
team
san
jose.
I
know
it
has
been
a
really
difficult
couple
of
years,
but
events
are
starting
to
come
back
and
I
know
that
because
I've
run
into
people
downtown
going
to
comic-con
and
other
events,
we
did
have
a
report
last
month
from
team
san
jose.
That
was
an
update
and
we're
going
to
get
another
update
in.
B
I
think
it
is
march
of
2022,
so
I
have
a
couple
questions,
but
I'll
wait
first
to
go
to
the
public
to
see
if
anyone
has
any
comments
over
there,
but
I
truly
want
to
thank
team
san
jose.
It's
been
a
tough
couple
of
years
with
a
pandemic,
and
I
know
in
a
business
that
caters
to
people
coming
into
town
that
when
they're
not
coming
into
town,
it's
hard
to
pivot
to
anything
else
at
that
point.
B
H
Hi
claire
beekman,
thanks
for
the
meeting
today
I'll,
try
to
say
what
I
feel
is
on
the
topic
in
point,
if
you
feel
uncomfortable
just
say
so,
I
feel
there
can
be
a
real
connection
to
team
san,
jose
work
and
downtown
the
use
of
downtown
parking
and
downtown
parking
statistics,
and
those
just
statistics
are
going
to
be
really
important.
This
fall
for
the
future
of
ai
practices
within
san
jose.
B
H
Do
with
parking
can
you
stay
on
topic
please?
But,
but
if
I
can
make
my
point,
I
feel
that
downtown
parking
issues
has
everything
to
do
with
team
san
jose
issues,
and
I
wanted
to
ask
about
an
all,
encompassing
idea
to
talk
about
data
collection
and
ai
issues
with
downtown
parking,
and
that
can
it
can
be
a
positive
experience.
The
whole
community
can
share
and
be
a
part
of
that
was
going
to
be
that's.
H
My
point
is
that
I,
I
feel
that's
a
fair
point
to
make
at
this
time
of
public
comment
and
what
team
san
jose
in
its
audit
report
can
be
considering
and
working
towards
and
towards
the
idea
of
what
can
be
a
a
whole
community
process.
You
know
different
parts
of
our
local
government
working
towards
a
positive
whole
and
that's
good
ai
practices
for
our
future.
H
Love
care,
open
democracy,
civil
protection,
ideas,
we're
doing
some
new
important
work
with
data
collection
and-
and
we
can
all
be
a
part
of
it
and
that's
what
brings
more
people
into
san
jose
in
the
future.
It's
these
are
the
ideas
of
innovation
that
will
bring
visitors
and
boy.
It's
the
good
stuff.
It's
it's
open,
democracy!
That's
our
future!
Thank
you.
I
I
Everything
is
boarded
up.
I
mean
downtown
san
jose.
I
call
it
plywood
city,
you
know
it
looks
like
tucker.
Construction
owns
everything
because
that's
what's
on
the
plywood,
and
I
I
think
that
this
town
is
going
down
the
tubes
I
mean
ever
since
they
built
the
death
star
there.
The
city
hall
take
a
look
around
the
radius
that
city
hall,
and
you
tell
me
that
there's
economic
development,
but
what's
it
look
like
around?
I
want
the
listeners
to
think
about
that.
B
I
Yeah,
well
those
numbers
they
look
great,
don't
they
not
looks
terrible.
You
guys
need
to
start
over
again,
maybe
with
a
bulldozer
because
the
audit,
well,
it
basically
shows
the
proof
in
the
pudding.
There's
no
numbers
there.
I
mean
it's
terrible,
you
guys.
I
mean
you
need
to
start
over
and
just
take
a
look
around
where
the
downtown
is
and
everything
and.
J
I
No
there's
audit
what
audit
zero?
That's
your
favorite
number
down
there
everything's
zero
for
you,
people,
zero
tolerance,
zer,
zero
traffic
fatalities,
zero
everything!
So,
whatever
it's
it,
you
know
it
looks
great,
and
I
also
want
to
wish
everybody
happy
thanksgiving
before
before
you
guys
think
of
a
new
way,
not
to
say
it
thanks.
L
Thank
you
good
afternoon
everybody
and
thank
you
for
the
question.
I
believe-
and
I
I
don't
have
the
notes
in
front
of
me,
but
I
believe
that
we
have
booked
the
public
a
couple
of
extremely
large
public
dance
events.
This
would
be
the
end
of
november.
It's
after
thanksgiving.
Is
that
correct,
that's
correct
right!
L
B
L
To
put
it
in
perspective,
they
just
played
madison
square
garden
over
the
weekend
and
they
sold
the
staples
center
out
for
seven
nights.
So
it's
it's
a
very,
very
large
popular
band
and
we
had
a
and
they're
finishing
their
north
american
tour
in
san
jose
with
these
two
concerts.
So
it
was
a
unique
opportunity
that
we
grabbed
and
the
public
dance
events
are
very
profitable
and
they
bring
a
great
crowd
downtown.
A
lot
of
them
stay
in
hotels
and
and
go
to
dinner.
L
B
That's
wonderful
and
thank
you
for
being
in
a
financial
position
to
pay
back
the
fifty
thousand
dollars.
That
was
a
pleasant
surprise
today.
I
thought
it
would
be
taking
a
little
bit
longer
than
that.
So
that's
great
that
now
we're
we're
at
parity
and
going
forward.
It's
it's
all!
It's
all
good
with
that.
Let's
vote.
D
B
C
A
All
means,
please
thank
you
very,
very
much
hi
nancy
klein,
director
of
economic
development
and
cultural
affairs,
and
thank
you
very
much
excited
to
bring
this
item.
You
know
it
is
thanksgiving
time
and
things
to
be
thankful
for
the
four
team
members.
You
don't
see
them
often
kevin
ice.
Who
will
talk
to
you
in
just
a
minute?
A
While
covid
was
going
on
while
kovit
was
raging,
the
team
still
very
much
put
nose
to
grindstone
got
a
ton
done
important
things
like
secure
sites
for
measure,
t
other
police
and
fire
activities
that
were
related
and
very
much
affordable.
Housing
sites
like
the
emergency
interim
housing
site,
so
they've
accomplished
a
lot,
and
I
I
hope,
you'll
share
that
view
from
the
memo
and
the
brief
presentation
kevin
over
to
you.
M
Thanks
nancy
hi,
I'm
kevin
ice
manager
of
the
real
estate
services
division.
The
written
memo
provided
to
the
committee,
a
summary
of
real
estate
services
fiscal
year.
2020
2021
highlights
21
22
priority
initiatives,
including
surplus
sales,
property
acquisitions
facility
leasing
and
property
management.
M
I'm
going
to
focus
today
on
key
accomplishments
from
the
past
fiscal
year
and
priorities
for
our
division.
In
year,
2122
work
in
fiscal
year,
2021
was
focused
on
delivering
progress
for
our
core
clients.
As
nancy
mentioned.
Some
of
the
highlights
are
are
up
here
on
the
screen
measure
t
public
safety
acquisitions.
M
We
acquired
a
hundred
thousand
square
foot
warehouse
located
at
300
enzo
drive
to
serve
as
a
future
police
academy
and
training
facility.
We
paid
three
million
dollars
below
appraised
value
for
that
property.
We
closed
on
a
property
for
fire
station
32
located
at
1138
under
court.
There
will
be
a
newly
constructed
fire
station
on
that
property,
which
is
addresses
one
of
the
most
impacted
regions
in
the
city.
M
In
regards
to
fire
response
times,
the
new
station
will
relieve
burden
on
surrounding
fire
stations
and
syncs
perfectly
with
land
that
we
acquired
previously
for
fire
station
8.
At
the
intersection
of
13th
and
santa
clara,
the
division
assisted
in
developing
affordable
housing
opportunities,
including
acquiring
the
surestay
by
best
western
hotel
with
state
project,
homekeep
funds
helping
the
housing
department
prepare
for
the
next
round
of
home.
Key
funding
by
negotiating
letter
of
intent
deals
for
four
hotels.
M
In
addition,
we
worked
with
habitat
for
humanity
and
the
developer
of
the
garden
gate
tower
downtown
to
leverage
city-owned
land
located
at
4th
and
reed
as
a
receiver
site
for
the
historic
palace
and
apartment
building,
which
was
in
danger
of
being
demolished.
Habitat
is
now
renovating
the
building
to
provide
ownership
opportunities
for
four
housing
units,
which
is
a
relatively
rare
opportunity
for
people
to
build
equity
and
affordable
housing
for
new
park
locations.
We
purchased
199
race
street,
the
old
pizza
hut
at
the
intersection
of
park
and
race.
M
We
initiated
an
internal
transfer
of
460
park
avenue
to
the
parks
department
and
we
managed
the
acquisition
of
100,
west,
alma
and
1413
sanborn
for
a
future
neighborhood
park
and
playground.
We
also
put
in
place
a
long-term
ground
lease
for
development
of
the
havana
midfield
pocket
park.
While
we
simultaneously
continue
to
work
on
the
multi-year
process
of
purchasing
the
land
from
caltrans.
M
We
completed
a
surplus,
sale
disposition
and
transfer
of
easements
for
the
coleman,
highline
development
and
we're
working
on
the
acquisition
of
park
avenue
right
away
for
the
city
view
project.
Finally,
we
initiated
a
few
operational
improvements.
The
division
received
certification
from
caltrans
to
perform
right-of-way
work
on
behalf
of
the
city,
which
will
save
the
city
money
and
make
us
less
reliant
on
consultants
for
project
management
that
include
federal
or
state
transportation
dollars.
M
M
Fiscal
year,
2122
priorities
include
working
to
wrap
up
the
remaining
measure:
t
public
safety
acquisitions
acquiring
sites
for
fire
stations,
23
and
36,
and
processing
a
land
transfer
with
the
vta
for
fire
station
8.,
following
through
on
the
project
homekey
purchases
for
any
projects
that
are
awarded
funding
by
the
state
acquiring
three
necessary
properties
for
the
development
of
lot
e,
which
is
a
parking
lot
behind
the
sap
center.
That
will
provide
necessary
parking
for
the
sharks.
M
M
M
This
database
will
be
critical
in
streamlining
the
work
that
real
estate
services
performs,
including
managing
real
property
operations,
obligations
and
leases,
but
we're
also
focused
on
coordinating
with
every
city
department
that
maintains
a
real,
a
real
property
database
to
ensure
that
we're
syncing
all
critical
information
into
one
database.
So
we
can
better
ensure
smooth
operations
and
lift
up
coordination
between
the
departments.
M
M
B
I
Well,
I'm
glad
that
you
know
we've
got
more
fire
departments,
given
the
fact
that
there's
are
stations,
I
should
say
given
the
fact
that
the
response
time
for
the
fire
department
here
san
jose
is
probably
one
of
the
worst
in
the
nation,
especially
where
I
live.
You
know
they
show
up
what
15
minutes
later.
I
Then
you
got
I'm
glad
you
guys
had
money
to
buy
a
place
for
a
police
academy.
I
mean
how
did
we
do
without
it
all
these
years
for
a
police
department?
Nobody
wants
to
join,
they
got
to
like
advertise
at
the
movie
theaters
for
these
things,
but
yeah.
I
hope
you
guys
can
maintain
this
property
that
you
buy
throughout
throughout
the
city
and
do
something
decent
and
just
you
know,
try
to
make
san
jose
a
better
place.
I
I
It's
a
hassle,
the
more
it
seems,
the
more
you
guys
buy,
the
worse
it
gets
well,
I
mean
take
a
look
around
city
hall
and
you
can
see
that
anything
that
you
guys
touch
kind
of
doesn't
really
turn
out
too
well.
Just
like
I
say
I
want
everyone
to
just
look
about
a
half
mile
radius
around
city
hall.
It's
not
the
place
you
want
to
be.
Maybe
you
guys
should
buy
it
up.
Maybe
you
could
make
it
even
worse,
but
yeah
just
try
to
maintain
what
you
have.
I
I'm
so
glad
you
guys
didn't
do
anything
out
there
in
coyote
valley.
What
you
should
do
with
coyote
valley
is
trap
the
coyotes
that
are
killing
everybody's
pets
and
bring
them
out
to
where
they
belong.
Coyote
valley,
it
could
be
a
nature
preserve
for
them
to
eat,
squirrels
and
everything
in
their
natural
habitat.
Once
again,
that
was
the
only
decent
thing.
I
think
I've
seen
you
people
do
since
I've
been
listening
to
these
meetings
that
go
on
for
hours
and
hours
and
hours,
nothing.
H
Hi,
thank
you
is
that
this
item
and
the
next
item
are
a
bit
related.
I
guess
to
to
first
speak
to
the
memo
itself
on
this
item.
There
was
issues
of
your
your
leasing
and
the
selling
of
land,
with
the
telecoms
government,
government,
leasing
and
selling
of
land
to
telecoms,
and
I
just
kind
of
wanted
to
give
a
thank
you
to
yourselves
as
a
city
that
you
are
actually
you're
trying
to
address.
H
You
know
the
future
of
four
and
5g
by
by
when
you
do
these
telecom
land
purchases
for
their
polls
and
stuff
you're
going
out
and
reaching
out
yourselves
as
city
government
to
neighborhood
associations
and
business
associations
of
the
area.
That's
a
really
good
step.
That's
impressive
and
you're,
not
just
putting
it
on
the
telecoms
themselves
to
do
the
work
of
the
notification
process
that
I
hope
that
I
can
continue
to
ask
questions
about
and
how
that
can
be
a
more
open,
accountable
process
for
everyone,
the
more
open
and
accountable.
H
That
is,
that
is
our
good
practices
and
that's
a
lot
we
can
do
for
ourselves
as
a
as
a
community.
It's
incredibly
important!
If
we
do
that.
Well,
a
lot
of
people
don't
want
to
do
that.
Well,
but
if
we
do
that
well,
that
means
we
care
and
we're
giving
ourselves
to
good
practices
and
that
that's
the
innovation,
that's
what
builds
our
community
future
and
sustainability
everybody.
H
H
I
hope
that
with
so
much
new
subsidy
money
coming
in,
we
will
want
to
concentrate
on
the
fundamentals
of
better
housing
for
low-income
people
also
and
that
in
six
months
time,
we're
going
to
have
to
seriously
address
that
you're
going
to
want
to
start
to
use
this
large
subsidy
funding,
we're
getting
from
state
and
federal
government
at
this
time,
you're
going
to
want
to
start
to
use
that
to
real
estate
companies.
I'll
talk
more
about
this
on
the
next
item.
K
D
B
D
D
You
know
I
was
out
there
talking
to
voters
about
that
a
long
time
ago,
and
I
know
you
know
people
always
get
nervous
when
we
want
to
issue
bonds
at
scale,
and
I
think
you
know
in
this
case
the
city
with
your
with
your
hard
work,
has
really
fulfilled
the
the
promise
of
of
that
campaign
and
and
made
good
on
on
our
commitment.
So
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
all
the
great
work
you've
you've
done
across
the
board,
but
especially
on
measure
t.
That's
all
for
me.
Chair.
B
B
N
N
N
N
However,
the
governor
vetoed
the
bill,
but
in
vetoing
the
bill,
the
governor
indicated
general
support
for
eviction
prevention
services,
but
he
wants
to
debate
this
policy
change
along
with
a
budgetary
appropriation
or
the
reallocation
of
existing
legal
aid,
money
in
next
year's
budget
cycle
and
then
per
council
direction
from
september.
28Th
we'll
be
back
at
council
in
december
with
an
update
on
our
eviction
prevention,
help
centers,
along
with
options
to
expand
legal
services
such
as
right
to
counsel
and
I'm
going
to
pass
it
over
to
kristin
who'll,
give
an
update
on
the
last
three
priorities.
C
C
However,
they
haven't
finalized,
how
we
should
present
that
information
to
them,
that's
what
the
memo
will
be
doing,
and
so
we
have
done
preliminary
analysis
of
the
preferences
that
we
would
like
to
do
and
we're
waiting
so
that
we
can
finalize
the
much
of
the
analysis
and
do
it
in
the
way
that
they
need
to
see
it
that
we've
been
using
the
tools
they've
ruled
out
for
the
assessment
of
fair
housing.
We
think
their
approach
will
be
very
similar
to
what
they're
telling
folks
to
use
for
afh.
C
Just
a
reminder:
three
reasons
that
the
state
needs
to
approve
our
tenant
preferences
number
one
for
any
deals
that
they
have
money
in
as
a
lender.
We
think
quite
a
few
of
our
deals
in
san
jose
that'll
be
true,
continue
to
be
true.
Second,
they
are
the
state,
lead,
fair
housing
agency
and
they
oversee
our
housing
element
and
all
of
our
fair
housing
programs
and
their
ability
to
kind
of
peer
into
what
we
are
doing
is
stronger
than
ever
under
state
law.
C
In
the
meantime,
we
have
been
working
on
getting
better
data
to
implement
tenant
preferences
so
that
our
analysis
can
be
better
than
it
has
been
we're
collecting
data
from
the
city's
rent,
roll
submissions,
starting
this
fall
more
demographic
information
for
all
tenants
of
existing,
affordable
housing,
so
that
that
analysis
can
provide
a
better
baseline
for
what
residents
are
like,
and
then
we
can
analyze
better
what
the
proposed
preferences
could
do
to
to
the
selection
of
tenants
and
then
compare
the
two.
That's
really
what
the
analysis
hdd
wants
to
see
is.
C
Both
san
jose
and
other
jurisdictions
have
been
working
on
and
that'll
continue,
or
that
will
develop
a
consistent
way
so
that
people
who
are
looking
for
affordable
housing
can
access
apartments
online,
but
they're
also
going
to
be
giving
information
about
themselves
about
their
demographics
and
whether
they
fall
into
protected
classes
as
they
apply
for
apartments.
So
that's
the
third
piece
that
we're
in
that
we
need
for
robust
analysis
of
disparate
impact
under
tenant
preferences.
C
C
C
C
We
do
hope
this
sac
becomes
a
regular
forum
to
discuss
not
just
copa,
implementation
ideas
and
specifics
about
you
know,
regulations
that
can
work
as
we
work
on
those
supposing
a
council
approval,
but
also
other
anti-displacement
strategies.
We'd
like
this
to
be
an
ongoing
forum
that
lives
beyond
this
work
next
slide.
C
And
so
in
the
what
four
weeks
since
we
talked
to
you
last
about
the
program,
we've
been
working
on
trying
to
finalize
a
detailed
program
description
so
that
we
can
go
out
to
the
public
in
the
next
couple
of
months
and
go
through
the
proposals
in
a
in
a
kind
of
more
detailed
way
which
is
challenging
right
because
it's
not
a
simple
program
and
it
also
entails
funding
from
the
city
which
is
kind
of
outside
the
scope
of
this
program.
So
it
takes
quite
a
bit
of
knowledge.
C
C
So
we
do
have
two
outreach
meetings
scheduled
for
december
right
now
december
6th
at
5,
00
pm
and
december
13th
at
3
pm
we'll
be
holding
broad
community
meetings
online
and
people
can
find
more
information
by
going
to
our
website
sjhousing.org
and
going
to
displacement
prevention.
Finding
the
information
there.
We
also
have
a
forum
scheduled
for
that.
The
caa
and
the
realtors
are
pulling
together
tentatively
scheduled
for
december
16th,
so
we're
trying
to
use
december
to
get
more
feedback.
C
We
have
a
meeting
set
up
also
with
the
housing
trust,
to
talk
about
financing
strategies
and
then
we'll
be
holding
more
public
meetings
in
january,
hopefully
co-hosted
with
some
other
organizations
from
our
attack
and
so
we're
hoping
that
people
who
are
interested
in
learning
more
can
sign
up
on
our
website
either
under
displacement
prevention
or
anti-displacement
home
page
or
our
community
opportunity
purchase
page
that
is
gone
up
and
we'll
have
a
link
to
sign
up
for
updates.
There
too,.
C
C
She
had
opened
up
interview
opportunities
for
all
commissioners
and
the
two
of
us
had
done
several
of
those
and
then
she's
gone
out
to
external
groups
as
well
and
met
with
them
several
times
and
still
basing
her
understanding
of
what's
needed.
Looking
at
other
municipalities
for
best
practices
so
and
thinking
about
adding
a
designated
seat
for
the
lived
experience,
we've
been
thinking
hard
about
the
commission's
optimal
size
and
the
difficulty
in
trying
to
keep
it
to
reasonable
size.
C
So
in
the
next
three
months,
recapping
next
quarter,
you'll
hear
that
we
worked
on
these
things
for
coveted
response
connecting
residents
and
owners
to
the
state
rental
assistance
program.
Operating
eviction,
help
centers
and
continuing
to
work
with
our
nonprofits
to
make
sure
that
residents
are
supported
for
tenant
preferences.
C
We
will
be
prepping
and
working
on
the
sp
649
meeting
with
stakeholders.
Hopefully,
we'll
have
met
with
the
state
both
on
the
bill
and
the
memo
for
how
to
do
preference
analysis
and
we're
hoping
that
most
of
our
tenant
preference
analysis
will
be
completed
in
the
next
three
months
for
coppa,
we'll
be
doing,
of
course,
a
lot
more
stakeholder
meetings
and
public
meetings,
finalizing
our
draft
program
recommendations
and
holding
public
review
meetings.
B
O
O
The
proof
is
in
that
data
right
there,
but
that's
the
next
item
this
one
that
has
to
be
prioritized,
because
we
it
can't
debate
as
to
whether
or
not
we're
going
to
put
it
off
to
the
state
all
while
the
state
didn't
decide
that
we
could
do
it.
Oh
so
we're
hamstrung.
We
can't
do
it.
No,
you
have
a
responsibility
now
to
ensure
that
the
residents
here
that
have
been
here
for
generations
that
like
got
dogged
out
with
the
they
got
dogged
out
with
the
redlining
they
got
dogged
out
with
poor
schools.
O
They
got
over
police
got
under
police.
You
know
get
all
of
this
history
of
san
jose
that
this
is
a
small,
a
small
gesture
of
recompense,
acknowledgement
and
responsibility
for
the
profits
that
this
city
acquired
as
a
result
of
the
maintenance
of
those
systems.
The
all
the
redlined
areas
profited
immensely,
just
at
the
just
at
the
notion
of
google
going
over
there
and
they
have
jumped.
Just
today
I
read
something
where
this
dude's
home
jumped
from
fifteen
thousand
dollars.
He
bought
it
and
now
it's
worth
two
million
in
two
generations.
O
This
is
the
proof
that
the
wealth
was
accumulated
there.
It
created
all
these
social
problems
within
the
neighborhoods
and
then
those
social
problems
were
criminalized.
So
this
is
one
small
area
that
this
city
can
acknowledge
that
hey.
You
know
what
we're
going
to
tie
this
to
the
red
line,
because
we
dogged
out
a
whole
generation
of
people.
H
Hi
blair
beekman
here
thanks
for
your
items
on
the
on
the
committee
agenda
today,
with
this
item
you
know
I
I'm
I'm
concerned
about
the
future
of
the
future
planning
of
eli
vli
and
mixed
income.
Housing
ideas
I'll
talk
more
about
that
on
the
next
item,
but
just
that
we
should
be
aware
of
their
good
practices
and,
as
always
and
and
then
the
next
few
years
we
can
work
to
plan
for
these
things.
H
You
know
the
the
the
they're
important
and-
and
as
I
tried
to
mention
in
the
previous
item,
that
we
can't
talk
about
or
that
we're
talking
about
the
use
of
state
and
federal
funding
dollars.
That
specifically,
should
be
meant
for
low-income
people
you're
talking
about
in
the
future
as
how
it
can
be
for
real
estate
developers
and
the
like.
I
think
that's
the
real
wrong
way
to
go
about
the
future
of
all
this
important
subsidy
practices
that
we're
having
at
this
time.
H
We
need
a
much
more
open,
larger
conversation
about
this
subject
matter
in
the
next
six
months.
It
really,
I
think,
needs
to
be
considered
a
new
direction
for
it
and
we'll
work
on
that
issue.
With
48
seconds,
you
know,
thank
you
for
your
report
on
on
housing
person,
home
houseless
persons
being
able
to
hopefully
one
day,
be
a
part
of
the
commission
process
like
hcdc.
H
This
is
important
work,
the
equity
roundtable,
the
covid
economic
forum.
I
think
they're
going
to
be
working
on
these
issues
as
well
and
what's
possible
by
this
june
upcoming
june.
There
should
be
a
report
available
that
should
state
the
condition
of
what
what
will
be
the
future
of
our
commission
process
and
that
it
can
be
a
more
shared
process
of
commissioners,
making
recommendations
to
council
and
city
government.
Good
luck
with
this
item
and
thanks
for
sharing.
I
After
you
get
done
talking
about
statue
removal.
I've
noticed
that
every
time
there's
a
statue
removal
anyone
who's
gung-ho
about.
It
should
second-guess
it,
because
that
means
people.
Removal
is
next.
It
can
remove
a
statue
and
remove
people
and
think
about
the
fallon
statue
they
had
nope.
They
have
no
place
to
put
it
just
like
they're
gonna
have
no
place
to
put
you.
B
I
There's
displacement:
there's
displacement
of
people
right,
it's
going
on
right
now,
because
what
you're
doing
with
all
this
gentrification
is
displacement
and-
and
you
there's
false
flag
issues
that
cover
it
up
right,
it's
you
get
people
distracted
by
other
things.
It's
really
easy.
I
mean
it's
the
oldest
trick
in
the
book
now
look
over
here.
Why
we're
doing
something
else
over
there
right
and
you?
You
clearly
know
you
don't
have
the
money,
you
don't
have
the
skills
you
don't
have
the
resource.
Don't
have
anything
to
be
able
to
house
all
these
people.
I
B
Turning
to
the
committee
does
anyone
have
any,
but
before
I
get
begin
first,
I
want
to
thank
kristin
and
reagan
again
for
the
presentation,
and
I
want
to
just
mention
coppa.
We
spent
quite
a
bit
of
time
discussing
coppa
last
meeting,
and
so
if
we
could
keep
our
copa
discussion
high
level
if
there
is
any
and
know
that
we're
going
to
be
back
here
with
coppa
in
more
detail,
I
believe
it's
february
with
that
council
member
mayhem.
D
Sure
and
I
I
will
stay
a
high
level,
I
was
going
to
just
ask
a
clarifying
question
on
kristin
your
point
about
code,
but
by
the
way,
thank
you
for
the
presentation,
and
especially
all
of
the
great
work
done
around
getting
rental
assistance
dollars
out
the
door
locally
and
also
appreciate
the
the
look
ahead
to
the
next
three
months.
That's
helpful
to
see
just
the
one
question
kristen,
based
on
your
comments
on
copa
was.
I
was
just
want
to
clarify.
D
I
heard
you
say
two
things
that
could
be
in
a
little
bit
of
conflict,
but
maybe
I'm
interpreting
them
incorrectly.
One
was
that
you're
working
with
stakeholders
to
get
to.
Yes,
even
though
we
know
there's
some
concern.
We're
hearing
concerns
from
some
of
the
stakeholders,
but
then
also
planning
to
give
us
give
council
impartial
analysis
of
the
pros
and
the
cons,
and
I
guess
I
just
want
to
understand-
are
we
are
we
at
the
point
of
trying
to
get
to
yes
or
we
still
evaluating?
C
Thanks
councilmember
and
yeah,
that's
a
good
point.
I
actually
had
thought
that
with
our
trusted
stakeholders
that
we
were
going
to
be
able
to
get
to
a
place
that
they
weren't
necessarily
happy,
but
that
they
felt
like
the
major
risks
had
been
mitigated
and
that
they
didn't
think
this
was
worth
costly
political
campaigns.
C
You
know
in
our
jurisdiction,
but
I
guess
I
was
wrong
about
that.
So
perhaps
that
was
a
speaking
point
from
a
week
or
two
ago.
We
think
that
what
we're
proposing
is
worth
working
on
you
know,
or
else
we
wouldn't
have
been
pursuing
it
all
at
least
all
of
this
time,
and
so
I
think
for
the
majority
of
people
that
we
have
been
talking
to.
You
know
I
think
again.
D
D
B
K
Rachel
vanderbeen,
rachel,
okay,
you've
got
rachel,
okay,
thank
you
and
I
think
jared
will
be
champion.
Victor
very
good,
go
ahead
and
start
talking.
So
all
right.
Well,
good
afternoon,
chair
and
members
of
the
committee,
our
team
is
bringing
you
an
update
on
the
housing
crisis
work
plan.
This
afternoon.
K
K
Land
use
designation
through
the
gen
through
general
plan
amendments
to
the
remaining
56
mobile
home
parks
throughout
the
city,
and
this
is
an
item-
that's
included
in
the
housing
crisis
work
plan.
So
this
was
one
specific
work
plan
item
that
they
discussed
and
wanted
to
provide
feedback
and
an
update
to
the
committee
based
on
their
discussion
at
the
commission.
K
So
here
what
you
can
see
in
front
of
you
today
is
our
chart
that
we
have
provided
many
times
to
the
committee
and
to
the
city
council,
which
provides
an
overview
of
building
permits
or
planning
approvals,
building
permits
and
occupants
occupancy
permits
for
both
market
rate
and
affordable
housing
by
separate
time
periods.
You
can
see
how
there's
been
progress
made
year
by
year
through
this
chart.
K
Affordable
housing
is
actually
keeping
pace
and
has
continued
to
make
progress
through
the
last
few
months.
There's
five
projects,
equaling
481
units
that
started
construction
in
2021,
and
we
also
had
one
more
project
with
140
units
start
construction
in
october.
That's
not
included
in
this
report,
so
I
personally
had
the
opportunity
to
go
to
a
couple
of
ground
breakings.
Just
recently
arya,
which
is
like
downtown,
is
87
units.
They
had
an
event
and
also
the
emmanuel.
K
K
K
In
august,
the
city
council
provided
direction
to
the
housing
catalyst
team
regarding
the
housing
crisis
work
plan.
So
first,
the
city
council
requested
that
our
team
develop
a
metrics-based
system
to
evaluate
both
the
impact
and
workload
for
each
of
our
workload.
Work
plan
items
included
in
this
report.
F
These
are
included,
including
a
summary
here
on
this
slide,
but
the
complete
definitions
are
on
attachment
b,
so
impact
we've
defined
by
the
estimated
number
of
affordable
or
market
rate
units
that
are
expected
to
result
or
the
likelihood
an
item
would
result
in
preservation
of
affordable
housing
or
likelihood.
An
item
would
result
in
time
or
cost
savings
for
new
development,
and
then
we
have
a
kind
of
a
red,
yellow,
green
color
coding
for
the
different
levels.
F
Level
of
effort
is
defined
by
the
amount
of
staff
work
required
to
complete
an
item,
and
then
we
also
have
a
variety
of
items
where
the
impact
is.
You
know
we
think
that
there's
an
going
to
be
an
impact,
but
we
need
more
work
in
order
to
complete
that
estimation,
and
then
there
are
also
a
number
of
items.
The
city
is
legally
required
to
complete
and
we've
noted
those
in
blue.
F
F
The
housing
crisis
work
plan
is
referred
to
the
city
council
in
the
spring
and
then
the
the
last
column,
as
I
mentioned
before,
we
have
a
number
of
items
that
are
included
in
the
work
plan
that
you
know,
we
think
are
likely
to.
You
know,
provide
a
benefit,
but
we
just
don't
know
yet
what
the
impact
is
until
more
work
is
done
in
those
policies.
F
I
think
there
were
kind
of
two
key
takeaways
that
we
wanted
to
to
mention.
You
know
with
a
lot
of
the
work.
That's
done,
the
impact
is
usually
not
immediate,
so
it
can
take
quite
a
bit
of
time,
sometimes
to
really
fully
assess
and
understand
what
the
impacts
were
to
a
policy
change
and
then,
generally
speaking,
the
highest
impact
items
are
also
the
ones
that
required
the
highest
level
of
effort
there.
P
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Jared
I'll
continue
on
so
just
kind
of
want
to
highlight
some
things
that
that
we've
completed
we've
mentioned
this
before,
but
we
have
the
san
jose
housing
site
explorer,
which
is
a
spatial
tool
that
developers
the
community
staff
can
use
to
identify
housing
sites
and
it's
continuing
to
be
evolved
and
improved
as
we
learn
more
and
it's
a
tool
actually
we're
expanding
upon
for
our
housing
element.
So
it's
got
many
uses.
P
The
other
sort
of
item
I
want
to
highlight
is
the
commercial
linkage
fee
implementation?
So
you
know
we
are
continuing
to
work
on
implementing
that
this
is
the
the
linkage
fee
that
was
approved
by
council
on
september
1st
of
last
year
and
we're
considering
changes
to
the
timing
of
payment
to
increase
the
collectibility
of
fees
and
determining
how
to
incorporate
this
fee
system
or
the
fee
into
our
existing
technology.
P
So
the
housing
element
is
a
large
body
of
work
and
we're
continuing
to
work
on
that.
The
formal
process
to
at
least
start
the
public
outreach,
the
public
engagement
process
for
the
housing
lot
really
started
this
past
summer
we
had
our
first
community
workshop
on
september
2nd
and
we
have
another
one.
Coming
up
on
december,
13th
staff
has
been
doing
pop-up
events
around
the
city.
I
know
they
were
at
vivekai.
P
So
that's
a
big
part
of
our
outreach
and
by
law
we
need
to
include
an
assessment
of
fair
housing,
so
this
is
work
that
actually
housing
department
has
been
working
on
for
a
long
time,
and
now
both
departments
are
working
on
integrating
this
into
our
housing
element.
I
do
want
to
highlight
one
significant
issue:
that's
come
up
recently
in
the
housing
element,
and
that
was
a
bill
authored
by
assemblyman,
chew
ab215,
which
took
effect
in
january
first,
and
this
bill
essentially
shortened.
P
The
timeline
for
staff
to
complete
the
housing
element
by
over
four
months,
so
we
were
planning
to
get
the
draft
element
done
in
september
and
now
we
have
to
get
it
done
in
april
mid
april.
So
it's
a
it's
a
it's!
It's
very
unfortunate.
It's
sort
of,
like
someone
pulls
the
rug
out
from
under
you
as
you
have
your
your
timelines
all
set
up,
and
it
said
nope
we're
going
to
increase
we're
going
to
reduce
the
schedule
by
another
four
and
a
half
months.
Sorry,
so
that's
that's!
What's
happening.
P
P
So
I
just
want
to
jared
already
mentioned
this,
but
I'll
dig
in
a
little
deeper.
These
are
some
items
that
were
recommending
that
be
dropped.
The
first
one
is
exploring
public
private
parking
opportunities,
and
the
idea
behind
this
is
their
ways
that
park
other
creative
ways
that
parking
could
be
provided
for,
affordable
housing
projects
to
facilitate
them
moving
forward.
P
P
So
that's
that's
really
sort
of
the
vehicle
of
that
when
they
do
want
parking
requirements
to
make
their
projects
more
feasible,
parking
reduction
requirements
they're
going
through
that
avenue-
and
that's
that's
working
so,
given
that
we
don't
really
see
need
to
continue
on
with
this
item,
the
other
one
is
do
changes
to
the
general
plan
and
allow
infill
prop
properties
to
allow
housing
on
problem
properties
in
san
jose.
This
is
actually
an
item
that
came
from
the
last
four
year.
Review
was
to
look
at.
P
P
I
think
just
not
so
much
to
develop
a
policy
but
to
sort
of
go
to
the
process
of
implementing
that
policy
once
one
was
established,
so
there
also
are
a
number
of
ongoing
items
that
we're
recommending
dropping
it's
not
that
we
won't
do
these
items.
We
are
continuing
to
do
these
items.
It's
just
that
the
items
in
the
work
program
we
really
felt
should
have
sort
of
completion
dates
attached
to
them
that
we
can
check
and
say
we're
done
and
let's
move
on
and
and
these
really
we
really
don't.
P
J
Thank
you
michael
afternoon,
chair
committee,
ramses,
madhu,
division,
manager
of
planning
policy
and
sustainability
for
d.o.t.
I
am
joined
by
augustine
cuello
from
dot
as
well.
We
were
asked
to
come
to
the
committee
to
update
you
on
our
work
on
the
transportation
analysis
policy
or
council
policy
5-1.
J
J
J
Perfect,
thank
you
for
telling
me
cut
this
thing
out
of
the
way
it
looks
so
fancy.
It
doesn't
always
work
so
anyways
yeah.
So
we
are
here
to
update
jump
5-1
and
just
giving
you
some
context
here
that
we
are
updating
this
policy
and
have
been
it
actually
was.
When
we
passed
the
policy
we
we
put
in
a
review
period
of
a
few
years,
depending
on
when
a
neighboring
jurisdictions
actually
adopted
their
versions
of
this
right.
J
The
sd743
responses,
so
we're
working
on
that
and
we're
expecting
the
actual
policy
change
to
happen,
along
with
the
access
and
mobility
plan
and
transit
first
policy
late
first
quarter
next
year,
all
right
so
first
just
giving
people
I
get
people
in
the
right
state
of
mind.
5-1
is
inconsistent
and
and
following
state
direction
through
sb
743,
which
required
us
to
change
our
sql
metrics
for
transportation
to
vehicle
miles
traveled.
J
J
The
first
one
is
just
removing
barriers
to
housing
production
that
are
already
allowed
through
the
general
plan,
so
we're
getting
a
few
reports
of
housing
developments
that
any
all
of
the
other
policies
in
the
city,
particularly
land
use
policies,
would
allow
it,
and
it's
only
this
policy
5-1
that
may
be
stalling
that
development,
so
we're
we're
kind
of
investigating
those
ones.
The
reports
we're
getting
to
figure
out
if
there
actually
are.
J
Ability
to
go
through
through
our
land
use
policies
can
always
have
access
to
some
form
of
override
or
something
like
that.
Like
that
and
the
vmt
policy
now
we
were
given
explicit
direction
not
to
do
something
like
that
when
we
built
the
policy,
so
we
want
to.
If
we're
going
to
go
that
direction,
we
want
to
be
very
careful
about
it
and
so
we're
still
investigating
what.
J
Way
to
unwind
that
is,
or
to
just
just
take
a
different
direction
there,
but
we
know
we
don't
want
to
stand
in
the
way,
particularly
of
infill
housing
and
so
we're
doing
investigation
again
of
all
the
sites
in
the
city
that
this
might
be
applied
to
now.
Another
way
that
we're
looking
at
streamlining
market
rate
housing
is
right
now,
there's
no
transportation
analysis
under
sql
required
for
transit,
supportive
projects
and
planned
growth
areas
with
low
and
with
already
low
vmt
qualities
that
are
near
high
quality
transit.
J
The
third
update
we're
looking
at
is
quite
broad
and
applies
only
to
affordable
housing.
So
right
now,
no
transportation
analysis
is
required
under
sequa
for
100,
restricted,
affordable
transit,
supportive
projects
only
in
planned
breath
areas
with
high
quality
transit.
We
already
didn't
have
that
low
vmt
qualifier
there.
J
In
this
case,
what
we're
looking
at
is
removing
the
plan
growth
areas,
and
so
this
would
go
from
the
map
on
the
left
side,
which
is
the
current
area
where
housing
is
allowed,
where
below
market
rate
housing,
affordable
housing
could
be
built
under
this
streamline
process,
and
you
can
see
the
the
very
large
increased
area
that
would
be
allowed
under
this
right.
So
in
essence,
affordable,
housing
across
the
city
would
be
given
an
easier
path
forward.
J
In
relationship
to
this
policy,
we
are
also
looking
at
the
what
it
means
to
be
affordable
under
this
policy.
Right
now
we
have
the
hundred
percent
restricted,
affordable
and
so
we're
looking
at
lowering
it
below
100
or
figuring
out.
If
there
are
other
qualifiers
around
the
type
of
affordability
that
might
also
incent
incentivize,
some
more
housing
growth
there
still
working
with
the
housing
department
and
everybody
here
on
this
call
to
figure
out
what
the
right
approach
there
is
and
I'll
pass
it
back
to
chair.
O
O
those
numbers
it
it's
it's
the
people
that
are
giving
these
reports
are
not
sensitized
to
what
those
numbers
mean.
Look
at
those
numbers
that
is
embarrassing.
That
is
embarrassing.
That
is
shameful
and
it's
dangerous.
People's
lives
are
going
to
suffer
as
a
result
of
the
inadequacies,
the
incompetence
and
the
complete
willful
and
deliberate
neglect
of
knowing
what
those
numbers
really
actually
mean.
We're
talking,
600
percent,
more
market
rate
housing
than
affordable
housing
come
on
man.
O
Now
you
extrapolate
that
over
time
it's
gonna
squeeze
people,
it's
gonna
squeeze
people
to
where
they're
it's
gonna
be
slow
and
what
you,
what
the
city
is
gonna
do
is
say:
oh
well,
no,
it
was
the
law
it
was.
It
was
this
this
policy,
no
man!
We
couldn't
do
that
because,
oh
man,
they
were
you
know
the
developer,
didn't
want
to
invest.
No,
no!
No!
No!
We
ain't
trying
to
hear
that
you
guys
have
been
put
on
notice
for
a
year
now
those
those
meetings
I
have
them.
I
keep
them.
O
I
keep
a
record
of
all
of
those
meetings
where
I've
made
those
comments
so
that
in
a
year
from
now
or
something
like
none
of
you
can
come
back
and
say:
hey
you
know
I
I
did
I
I
didn't
know,
look
at
those
numbers.
Those
numbers
mean
people's
lives
being
squeezed
out
of
here.
That's
what
it
means.
You
guys
talk
about
data.
O
G
Martha
o'connell
regional
manager
for
gsmol,
on
behalf
of
the
thousands
and
thousands
of
san
jose
residents
who
live
in
our
59
mobile
home
parks,
12
of
which
are
senior
parks.
Gsmo
all
asked
that
ced
and
council
implement
the
motion
of
the
hcdc.
You
have
before
you
my
two-page
letter.
Please
look
at
it.
That
motion
was
that
the
application
of
the
mobile
homeland
designation
be
the
initiated
for
the
remaining
56
mobile
home
parks.
G
G
G
Designation
staff
was
opposed
to
this
and
I
have
been
watching
the
housing
department
since
2004
and
what,
in
my
opinion
frequently
when
they
don't
like
a
motion
that
council
passes
or
that
the
housing
commission
passes,
they
start
this
bureaucratic
end
run
where
the
action
is
continued
to
be
put
at
the
end
of
the
line,
and
in
my
opinion
this
is
what's
going
on.
So
please
don't
let
the
staff
employees
run
the
city
council.
G
H
Hi
thanks
for
the
words
of
paul
soto.
Today
we
have
to
begin
to
make
more
clear
the
importance
of
how
to
more
openly
talk
about
eli,
vli
and
mix
them
mixed
income
planning
ideas
for
housing.
It
takes
practice
and
effort,
but
for
the
most
part,
local
government
is
simply
afraid
how
to
make
this
subject
matter
more
open,
reasonable
and
comfortable
for
ourselves.
H
How
can
it
start
to
become
just
as
easy
to
talk
about
and
mention
these
ideas
publicly,
as
it
is
privately
with
each
other?
This
is
a
reagan-era
superstition
that
still
won't
allow
local
government
to
offer
these
words
more
easily
in
public.
How
can
we
break
through
this
superstition
and
remember
how
much
I've
been
talking
about
the
importance
of
new
state
and
federal
subsidy
money
that
is
now
becoming
available
for
housing,
local
needs,
etc.
H
I
think
subsidy
money
should
be
focused
on
low
income
needs
and
and
the
creative
energy
to
work
towards
those
goals
should
be
our
first
and
foremost
way
to
be
thinking
in
the
next
six
months
and
it's
not
towards
how
to
pad
the
the
real
estate
development
industry
so
boy,
you
know
good
luck
on
how
you
talk
about
these
issues.
I
hope
we
can
work
towards
open,
clear
dialogue.
B
B
D
I
am
thanks
chair
fully,
I
am
yes
thank
you
to
staff
for
the
great
update
and
really
appreciate
seeing
the
the
matrix
that
helps
us
better
understand
where
we're
allocating
our
resources
and
what
the
expected
impact
is.
So
that
was
great
to
see.
I
really
appreciate
that
I
wanted
to
add
a
few
follow-up
questions
on
it.
So,
let's
see
here,
if
we
getting
back
to
my
slides
just
out
of
curiosity
on
slide
three
when
we
have
the
category
for
under
construction,
can
someone
just
remind
me
what
the
definition
is
and
is
it?
F
D
F
C
D
If
we
considered
adding
some
sort
of
rough
range,
I
mean
I
assume
that
so
I'm
looking
at
high
impact,
you
know,
building
a
hundred
plus
units.
A
thousand
units
is
not
the
same
as
preserving
one
affordable
unit.
So
how
do
we?
How
do
you
think
about
the
sort
of
range
of
impact
for
those
other
metrics
beyond
production,
since
that's
the
only
one
that
seems
to
have
numbers
assigned.
F
Yeah,
it's
something
we
could
think
more
about.
I
think
you're
right
the
time
and
cost
savings.
How
we
would
we
would
metric
that
I
think,
would
be
a
little
more
challenging
on
the
preservation
right
now,
as
it's
written.
I
think
there
is,
you
know,
sort
of
a
preference
for
for
preservation
and
that,
if
it's
only
even
if
it's
only
a
few
units,
you
know
that
would
be
something
that
we
would
say
is
high
impact
given
the
need
for
for
preservation.
F
K
D
Yep
yep
certainly
important,
I'm
yeah
not,
and
I'm
not
at
all,
questioning
that.
I
think
it's
just
you
know
if
we're
gonna
categorize,
something
as
high,
moderate
or
low
it'd,
be
good
to
know
what
that
actually
means.
I
mean
it
wouldn't
be
super
rational
as
a
city
to
devote
expensive
staff
resources
to
a
policy
that
would
save
one
unit.
Now,
that's
kind
of
an
extreme
case.
I
don't
imagine
we
would
ever
pursue
a
policy.
D
The
case
that
we
could
over
time
actually
estimate
what
we
think
that
this
investment
might
reduce
the
time
of
getting
a
permit,
reviewed
or
getting
an
inspection
completed
by
five
days
or
ten
days,
and
that's
gonna,
you
know
so
I
think
it.
It
may
be
possible
that
you
know
it's
probably
a
conversation
have
offline,
but
it
would
be
interesting
to
know
if
we
can
get
to
a
point
where
we
can
kind
of
look
at
average
days
to
complete
those
steps
in
the
process
and
then
try
to
quantify
how
much
we're
trying
to
move
those
numbers.
D
I
guess
that's
more
of
a
comment
and
then
just
a
couple
other
questions
comments
here
on
slide.
Six.
I
just
want
to
confirm
so
the
three
that
have
the
blue
dots
are
legally
required
to
complete,
which
is
totally
appropriate,
makes
sense
that
when
we've
got
a
mandate,
we've
just
got
to
do
it,
whether
it's
high
impact
or
not.
But
I
noticed
that
all
three
of
these
were
put
in
high
impact,
which
implies
production
of
over
100
units
or
preservation
of
some
meaningful
number
of
units
or
significant,
or
you
know,
meaningful
reduction
in
in
time.
D
Cost
is
that
true,
or
do
those
actually
potentially
belong?
You
know,
I
think
it's
fine
if
blue
dots
are
in
low
impact,
if
we're
mandated
to
do
it.
That
may
just
be
the
case.
Sometimes
so
am
I
am
I
accurately
reading
that
each
of
those
are
in
fact
high
impact
in
terms
of
production,
preservation
or
reducing
time
in
the
in
the
entitlement
and
permitting
process.
F
Yeah,
I
think
they
they
kind
of
each
maybe
fit
into
the
kind
of
the
three
elements
of
high
impact
housing
element
having
an
impact
on
number
of
units
created
to
kind
of
aligning
zoning
with
general
plan,
I
think,
on
on
time,
savings
potentially
cost
and
time
savings,
and
then
assessment
of
fair
housing,
probably
more
on
the
preservation
side
of
the
rankings.
Okay,.
D
Cool,
so
you
guys
thought
about
that.
I
guess
I
just
wanted
to
articulate
that
I,
even
though
I'm
I'm
pushing
very
hard
for
us
to
go
for
high
impact
low-cost
projects.
I
I
totally
appreciate
that
we're
going
to
have
these
blue
dots
and
they
may
show
up
even
in
low
impact,
and
we
just
have
to
do
them
anyway,
because
that's
just
the
nature
of
the
world
we
we
live
in.
So
that's
fine.
D
I
did
want
to
suggest
on
this
slide
six
again
here
that
we
look
at
coding
these,
according
to
which
of
the
three
metrics
you're
using
which
which
of
these
are
predominantly
about
production,
which
are
predominantly
about
preservation,
which
are
predominantly
about
speeding
up
time
or
reducing,
speeding
up
time
or
reducing
cost,
which
can
be
kind
of
two
sides
of
the
same
coin.
It's
hard
to
it's
still
as
as
much
of
an
improvement
as
this
is.
I
think
it's
awesome.
D
F
D
D
Yeah,
I
totally
understand
it's
just
hard
as,
as
we
read
these
boxes-
okay,
great,
it's
high
impact,
but
is
that
preservation
or
or
what
what's
the
impact
we
expect
anyway,
yeah?
I
know
it's
a
lot
of
content
understood,
maybe
there's
like
a
little
key
that
we
can
use
anyway.
Okay,
I
wanted
to
shift.
I
again
really
appreciate
the
direction
you're
going
in
there.
D
I
think
it's
really
helpful,
for
it's
gonna,
be
really
helpful
for
council
to
be
able
to
see
this
matrix
and
sort
of
understand
where
we're
where
we're
making
our
bets
and
why
and
what
we
think
the
impact
is
going
to
be
and
and
then
the
the
flip
side
of
that.
What
do
we
do
prioritize?
Why
and
then
on
policy
5-1
just
want
to
touch
on
that
for
another
minute
and
then
I'll
hand
it
back
to
you.
D
Chair
is
our
implementation,
so
I
remember
councilman
peralta
is
putting
forward
this
motion,
which
I
supported
and
appreciate
that
he's
looking
for
ways
to
increase
housing
production
for
affordable
housing,
specifically,
is
our.
I
guess
I
wanted
to
understand
for
context.
Is
our
policy
5.1
5-1,
similar
to
how
other
cities
have
implemented
their
local
sort
of
interpretation
of
vmt
rules,
or
are
we
an
outlier
in
any
way.
J
Well,
we
are
generally
in
line
with
both
the
state
recommendations,
so
we
analyzed
all
the
state
recommendations
and
did
a
little
bit
of
of
tightening
here
and
there,
but
mostly
around
a
commercial
projects.
The
difference
actually
is
where
we
do
and
don't
allow
overrides
for
housing
projects
right.
So
we
we
tightened
up
the
the
piece
around
that
to
try
to
keep
housing
in
the
planned
growth
areas
versus
being
able
to
to
get
an
override
anywhere
in
the
city,
and
so
that
is
the
part
that
we're
looking
at
now.
D
Got
it
and
it
sounded
like
from
your
presentation
we're
on
that
override
piece,
just
sort
of
reading
between
the
lines?
It's
not
like.
You
were
open
to
it,
but
did
not
made
a
decision.
Can
you
just
tell
us
a
little
bit
more
about
what
you
see
as
the
pros
and
cons
of
changing
that
override
provision.
J
Yeah,
absolutely
so
so
to
be
fair,
we're
still
looking
at
it.
So
we're
still
trying
to
get
enough
data
to
to
make
a
really
good
recommendation,
and
we
have
time
so
we're
okay,
but
the
basics
are
one
you
know
over,
allowing
if
the
general
plan
allows
something
which
generally
we
should
allow
right.
The
transportation
shouldn't
be
used
as
a
wedge
other
policies
right
so
that
that's
just
a
consistency
of
policy
issue
that
we're
trying
to
make
sure
we're
not
standing
right.
J
So
that's
kind
of
the
basis
of
the
approach,
but
there
is
some
places
where
the
city
needs
to
ask
itself
whether
it
really
wants
to
see
development
in
those
kinds
of
areas,
and
you
could
see
some
development
along
the
sides
of
the
hills
on
the
side.
Things
like
this,
where
there
has
been
traditionally
and
historically
been
a
real
push
to
say:
hey
only
these
lower
density
kinds
of
things.
E
J
Anything
can
be
developed
out
there,
and
so
the
transportation
policy
has
always
been
a
part
of
that
land
use
soup.
That
kind
of
keeps
us
in
line,
and
so
we
again
and
that
and
that's
where
it
is,
is
like
all
right.
Should
we
open
it
up
to
everything
and
we
need
to
careful
very
michael
brio
and
others
from
the
plane
department.
We
really
need
to
sit
down
and
carefully
think
about
all
right.
F
J
F
J
D
Yep
yep.
No,
I
appreciate
that
makes
sense
in
terms
of
other
mitigating
measures
that
you
know
you
considered,
if,
if
council
were
to
have
the
ability
to
override
the
policy
first
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
are
there
are
there
specific
fees
that
are
applied
or
could
be
potentially
increased
to
serve
as
kind
of
an
alternative
mitigation?
J
Yeah,
so
we
do
actually
have
an
override
mechanism
in
the
policy
already,
and
so
that
is
really
focused
on
the
on
infill
housing
in
urban
villages
right
and
so
there
is
a
whole
fee
structure.
It
has.
It
has
a
whole
basis
in
the
nexus
study
and
has
a
and
has
a
cost
escalator
based
on
on
how
much
emt
is
not
mitigated
already.
So
if
we
would
open
really
what
we're
talking
about
is
opening
that
mechanism
up
to
more
places
is
really
the
question
at
hand.
D
Right
right,
okay.
Well,
I
appreciate
the
further
the
the
additional
context
there.
It's
helpful,
as
I
kind
of
think
through
that
for
myself,
but
thank
you
so
much
and
thanks
to
staff
for
the
detailed
presentation
across
the
board
share.
I,
if
you'd
like
I,
can
offer
a
motion
to
accept
the
staff
report.
B
J
We
don't
need
any
we've
gotten
the
direction
we
need
and
we'll
be
bringing
that
to
you
all
shortly
happy
to
engage
with
you
or
your
staff
to
dive
in
deeper.
If
you
guys
want
to
kind
of
understand
what
we're
looking
at,
but
particularly,
if
you
look
at
at
slide
12,
you
can
really
see
you
know
where
we're
really
looking
at
quite
a
lot
more
land
in
the
city
being
opened
up
so
yeah.
We
have
direction
to
go
and
we'll
be
bringing
you
what
we
have.
J
B
Okay,
so
I'm
just
gonna,
pin
you
down
on
timing
a
little
bit.
You
said
quickly.
What
does
that
mean
and
because
we
don't
want
any
projects
to
stand
in
the
way
of
this?
What's
do
you
have
the
resources,
the
staffing
resources
you
need
and
and
how?
When
could
you
realistically
bring
it
back
to
council?
I
don't
know
that
it
needs
to
come
back
to
here,
but
when,
realistically,
when
could
you
bring
it
back
to
council
yeah.
J
We're
slated
to
go
to
t
e
with
the
access
mobility
plan,
transit,
first
policy
and
this
5-1
update
in
march
and
come
back
to
council
in
april.
Could
we
use
more
resources
always,
but
we
have
a
pretty
incredible
staff.
I
have
to
call
out
augustine
cruella
here,
who's
really
leading
this
effort
in
developing
it.
So
if
you
have
some
some
extra
resources
hidden
under
a
couch
sure,
it
always
could
help.
We
are.
We
do
feel
like
that,
and
I
do
want
to
call
out
public
works.
B
Wonderful
that
that
really
helps
me
gives
me
an
idea
of
timing.
Moving
on
to
the
mobile
home
zoning
changes,
I
do
have
some
questions
and
concerns
about
that.
It
has
been
a
while,
since
the
council
approved
it
unanimously.
So
what
is
a
side
coven
happening
in
the
pandemic
happening
in
the
last
year?
P
Yeah,
so
the
main
issue
of
us
getting
the
work
done,
is
we
don't
have
the
resources
to
do
the
work,
so
council
would
need
us
to
give
us
those
resources
we
anticipate.
We
need
one
full
time
planner
for
about
18
months
to
do
this
and
we
don't
have
a
position
to
do
this
work.
We
also,
I
mean
we're
going
to
need
some
amount
of
cash
as
well
for
outreach
and
things
like
that.
It's
you
know
we
it's
possible.
P
B
F
B
B
B
So
what
can
we
do
to
look
to
move
forward
on
on
a
policy
that
the
city
is
approved
and,
and
more
importantly,
puts
some
concern
of
our
senior
residents
of
mobile
home
parks
and
other
tenants
at
mobile
home
parks
at
rest,
because
because
they're
nervous
that
their
property
owners
are
going
to
be
able
to
go
out
and
change
the
zoning
right
away
and
build
development?
Can
you
offer
some
level
of
comfort
that
these
changes
have
to
come
back
to
council
anyway?
B
A
You
chair,
foley,
rosalind
huey,
deputy
city
manager,
so
I
think
I'll
I'll
answer
the
second
part
of
your
question.
First,
regarding
mobile
home
park,
so
the
city
we
currently
have
a
mobile
home
park
conversion
policy
that
any
owner
that
wants
to
initiate
a
conversion.
They
have
to
abide
by
that
policy.
So
that
is
a
really
big,
probably
the
most
important
protection
that
we
have
in
place
for
our
mobile
home
park
residents.
A
B
B
I
I
appreciate
that
and
finally,
I
have
a
question
about
the
production
report,
so
rachel
thank
you
for
those
numbers,
but
you
mentioned
something
that
surprised
me.
I
wrote
a
note
before
you
said
it:
where
are
the
adus,
and
then
you
mentioned
that
the
adus
are
listed
as
market
rate.
Why?
Why
do
you
have
the
adu's
risk
listed
as
market
rate
and
not
affordable,
because
I
consider
them
naturally
affordable
units.
K
B
F
F
B
Yeah,
if
jared,
if
you
can't
get
it
in
the
next
few
minutes,
that's
fine.
Just
let
us
if
you
could
let
us
know
that
would
be
helpful
and
and
in
future
reports
we'll
be
able
to
see
the
the
adus
and
rachel.
I
appreciate
the
explanation
about
deed
restrictions
and
you're
right
adus,
unless
they're
using
some
funding
source
that
requires
affordable
housing,
then
that's
different,
but
so
I
I
that
makes
sense
rosalind.
You
turned
off
your
mic.
Did
you
have
something
you
wanted
to
add.
A
F
B
C
J
B
I
One
word:
affordable
should
never
be
used
in
any
city
council
meeting,
there's
nothing
affordable
in
this
town,
including
a
sandwich
and
you're,
trying
to
think
you're
trying
to
pass
all
this
legislation
for
affordable
housing.
It's
never
going
to
happen.
The
land
is
too
expensive,
the
labor's
too
expensive,
everything's
too
expensive,
and
then
there's
this
fascination
some
fetish
really
with
parking
who's.
Where
are
you
going
to
park
your
car?
Because
you
know
what
in
the
end,
that's
all
you
have
control
over
in
this
city
is
parking
right.
This
is
where
you
can
make
money.
I
You
can
control
people,
you
can
say
how
wide
the
parking
space
has
to
be.
You
know
how
many,
how
many
minutes
you
can
be
there.
You
guys
are
obsessed
with
parking
and
mass
transit
and
it
seems
to
be
the
only
thing
you're
able
to
really
excel
at
is
the
parking
right,
the
mass
transit.
Well,
that's
a
disaster
have
all
this
fascination
with
building
mass
transit.
Next
to
these
next
to
low
income
housing.
This
place
is
going
to
look
like
moldova
or
some
bad
eastern
european
country.
I
Some
days
it's
going
to
be
gray
and
ugly
with
a
light
rail
that
goes
two
miles
an
hour
with
the
with
no
parking
anywhere.
It's
really
weird,
I
mean
anytime,
you
guys
find
a
new
way
to
rezone
or
do
anything
different.
All
these
no
parking
signs
go
up.
It's
really
strange.
You
guys
are
obsessed
with
it.
I
You're
obsessed
with
with
fees
you're
obsessed
with
with
with
these
parking
tickets
and
all
all
these
housing
measures,
you're
experi,
you're
obsessed
with
the
fee
the
fee,
how
much
more
money
can
you
guys
get
out
of
people,
and
where
does
all
the
money
go?
Really
you
guys
are
a
disaster.
You're,
not
gonna.
This
city
in
the
next
10
years
is
gonna,
be
terrible
because
you're
gonna
run
out
of
money
with
all
these
things
that
you
promised
and
and.
H
Hi
blair
beakman
here
there
are
some
interesting
things
said
today.
I
hope
we
can
begin
to
better
consider
how
the
future
of
committee
meetings
can
be
open
and
offer
good
facts.
A
reminder.
I
am
feeling
mixed
income
ideas
can
offer
an
incredible
flexibility
for
all
sides
that
can
make
adjustments
large
or
small
how
all
income
levels
can
live
together
in
a
local
neighborhood.
H
It
is
people
of
low
income
who
need
subsidy
help
the
most.
I
hope
we
can
work
towards
more
creative
ways
to
consider
the
future
of
subsidy
help
in
a
free
market
economy.
Can
we
more
often
openly
talk
about
ideas
like
reinvesting
subsidy
funding
in
the
next
few
years,
with
good,
green
sustainability,
renewable
energy
and
local
procurement
practices
for
local
neighborhoods.
H
I
also
wanted
to
remind
you
know,
there's
some
serious
protests
going
on
in
in
europe
at
this
time.
I
wanted
to
again
remind
the
importance
of
mass
use
during
the
holiday
times.
It
can
really
help
with
the
coveted
issues,
so
it
won't
grow
proportionately
here
in
this
country
that
it
might
do.
I
hope
we
can
learn
to
talk
about
the
vaccination
process
that
we're
trying
to
practice
well
in
this
country.
We
have
kind
of
a
loose
system
here
going
right
now
and
it's
respectful
to
all
sides.
H
I
think
good
luck
in
how
you
can
talk
to
city
government
people
and
make
that
process
for
them
open
and
understandable
if
they
have
feelings
and
worries
about
the
vaccine
process
and
that
it
just
can
be
easier
to
talk
about
the
vaccine
process
and
all
of
its
parts.
You
know
my
feelings
about
open,
accountable
public
policy
practices
with
technology
can
really
help.
H
All
sides
have
a
neutral
space
to
address
these
sort
of
issues
and
with
20
seconds
good
luck
with
the
redistricting
ideas
and
and
the
unity
maps
and
the
community
maps.
I
feel
the
unity
people
have
really
reached
out
and
tried
to
be
honest
and
decent
about
the
process
and
they're
asking
for
unity.
That's
what
they're
working
towards
good
luck,
how
we
can
do
those
things
in
the
next
few
weeks,
thanks.
O
Paul
soto
from
the
horseshoe
I'm
reading
an
analysis
of
crime
of
poverty
in
1885.
Therefore,
he
who
holds
the
land
on
which
and
from
which
another
man
must
live,
is
that
man's
master
and
the
man
is
his
slave.
The
man
who
holds
the
land
on
which
I
must
live
can
command
me
to
life
or
to
death.
Just
as
absolutely
as
though
I
wear
his
shadow
talk
about
abolishing
slavery,
we
have
not
abolished
slavery.
We
have
only
abolished
one
rude
form
of
it:
shadow
slavery.
O
There
is
a
deeper
and
more
insidious
form
a
more
cursed
form
yet
before
us
to
abolish
in
the
industrial
slavery
that
makes
a
man
a
virtual
slave,
while
taunting
him
and
mocking
him
with
the
name
of
freedom.
Poverty
want,
they
will
sting
as
much
as
the
lash
slavery.
God
knows,
there
are
horrors
enough
in
slavery,
but
there
are
deeper
horrors
in
our
civilized
society
today.
This
man
wrote
this
in
1885,
okay,
and
so
this
is
there's
what's
going
on
with
the
city.
It
just
needs
to
stop.