►
From YouTube: AUG 19, 2021 | Redistricting Advisory Commission
Description
City of San José, California
Redistricting Advisory Commission of August 19, 2021
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=886142&GUID=26D82BC8-5024-4631-990E-855DE5EA12E6
A
A
A
B
A
I'll
call
the
roll
beginning
with
daisy
castro.
Was
it
you,
jonathan
bruns,
blinker
wright,.
C
A
A
I'll
call
the
roll
again
daisy
castro.
A
Sorry,
what
was
that?
Oh,
to
approve
the
orders
of
the
day?
Thank
you
I'll
skip
those
who
are
absolutely
right.
Hi
ready,
sid,
bree.
C
A
B
B
Great
moving
on
to
item
two
public
record:
there's
no
public
record!
So
we'll
move
on
to
item
three,
the
consent
calendar.
Is
there
any
member
of
the
public
who
would
like
to
address
the
consent
calendar?
A
Yes,
daisy
castro,
yes,
lenka
right,
yes,
ready,
sidbury,.
E
B
Great
next
item
for
reports
just
wanted
to
announce
that
we
have
started
public
hearings.
We
have
been
conducting
public
hearings
in
a
pub
hybrid
fashion,
so
that
the
public
and
commissioners
can
either
appear
in
person
or
remotely
by
zoom.
B
B
And
finally,
I
wanted
to
announce
that
the
census
bureau
released
census
data
last
week
on
august
12th
and
it's
my
understanding
that
we
now
will
wait
for
the
state
officials
to
crunch
the
data
into
a
more
usable
format
for
our
purposes,
and
I
look
forward
to
getting
more
insight
from
redistricting
partners
on
that
front.
Moving
on.
Would
the
clerk
like
to
present
a
report
for
us
today.
F
Well,
the
communities
of
interest
I
think,
are
going
as
well
as
can
be
expected.
We
we
have
done
outreach
on
nextdoor
and
facebook.
We've
I've
sent
it
out
to
all
the
neighborhood
organizations
where
I'm
also
preparing
an
email
to
the,
not
any
email,
but
like
a
general
post
that
will
go
to
everybody.
I
can
think
of
every
community
based
organization,
as
well
as
every
neighborhood
organization,
as
well
as
all
boards
of
commission
members
with
a
link
to
the
paul
mitchell.
F
F
So
if
they
can't
make
it
to
any
of
the
public
hearings,
they
can
watch
the
presentation
and
do
the
the
district
r
exercise
on
their
own
time.
So
I
think
that
would
that's
going
to
be
very,
very
good
for
the
public,
because
you
know
it's
saturdays.
In
the
summer
not
everybody
can
can
attend.
They've
got
other
things
that
they're
doing
they're
going
to
the
beach
or
whatever.
F
So
I
think
that'll
really
help
with
communities
of
interest
participation
and
then
just
a
reminder-
and
we
can
talk
about
this
on
the
schedule
we'll
have
districts.
F
I
didn't
what
I
didn't
write
it
on
my
calendar,
on
which
two
districts
that
we
have
this
weekend,
that
have
to
look
like
nine
and
ten
okay.
So
nine
and
ten
are
this
saturday,
then
we're
gonna
have
a
two
week
break
and
then
we'll
do
the
the
remaining
districts
on
september,
11th
and
18th.
So
that's
three
and
seven
four
and
five
and
then
we
do
have
to
do
district
six
again.
So
I'm
thinking
if
district
six
is
the
only
one
for
which
we
lack
quorum.
F
I
can
add
it
to
like
5
pm
on
the
18th
or
we
could
do
10
a.m
on
the
25th
either
or
so
I
haven't
locked
that
one
down
yet
I'm
kind
of
waiting
to
make
sure
we
have
a
quorum.
We
do
have
to
legally
have
it,
even
though
we
did
give
the
presentation
we
did
receive
testimony.
It
doesn't
count
as
a
public
hearing
because
we
didn't
have
a
quorum.
So,
as
nadine
said,
that's
very,
very
important.
F
F
B
Okay,
great,
thank
you
tony.
Would
a
redistricting
partners
like
to
present
a
report
or
should.
F
They're
gonna
talk
they're
here
for
the
the
schedule.
We
understand
what
what
the
next
steps
are.
B
Okay,
great,
then,
would
any
members
of
the
public
like
to
address
the
reports
section.
B
I
don't
see
any
hands,
so
we
can
move
on
to
item
number
five
public
hearing.
There's
no
public
hearing
tonight
item
six
old
business.
So
our
old
business
item
for
discussion
is
on
the
communities
of
interest,
public
hearings
and
outreach
and
I'll
go
ahead
now
and
turn
it
over
to
our
consultant.
Redistricting
partners.
B
B
B
Okay,
I
I
didn't
understand
thanks
so
we'll
move
on
to
item
seven
new
business.
There's
no
business
business
tonight,
item
eight
meeting
schedule
and
agenda
items,
so
this
next
section
that
we
have
we
first
have
our
senior
deputy
city
attorney
mark
vanni
to
speak
to
us.
He
shared
a
memorandum
mark.
Would
you
like
to
discuss
the
memo.
E
Okay,
can
you
all
hear
me
now?
Yes,
thank
you,
okay
good,
so
I
I
circulated
around
to
everybody.
I
believe
last
week,
the
materials
that
went
to
council
this
week
detailing
the
scheduling
for
redistricting.
Now
that
the
results
are
out,
we
know
what
we
need
to
do
in
order
to
complete
redistricting,
and
so
we
recommended
to
the
city
council
to
amend
the
deadline
for
the
report
and
recommendations
from
the
redistricting
redistricting
commission
to
november
18th.
E
That
was
done
in
consultation
with
the
clerk's
office,
as
well
as
the
consultant
redistricting
partners,
and
the
reason
for
setting
that
deadline
is
that
the
council,
the
council,
has
sufficient
time
in
order
to
conduct
the
public
hearings
that
it
is
required
to
under
the
fair
maps
act,
and
the
recommendation
was
done
with
the
intention
that
council
would
not
have
to
call
any
special
meetings
in
order
to
conduct
those
those
hearings,
although
they
certainly
can
do
so.
E
And
then
the
deadline
for
the
council,
which
it
set
for
itself,
would
be
january
11th
to
approve
the
redistricting
ordinance,
which
then
goes
into
effect.
31
days
later
and
now,
if
everything
goes
according
to
plan,
will
get
us
in
just
in
time
for
everything
to
apply
for
the
june
2022
primary,
and
all
of
that
was
approved
last
week
on.
E
Consent,
let
me
know
if
anybody
has
any
questions
but
that's
concludes
my
update.
F
Hi
this
this
is
tony.
I
want
to
share
the
timeline
for
those
of
you
who
didn't
see
it
or
weren't
looking
at
it,
because
I
have
had
a
few
questions
on
this
particular
this
schedule
and
oh,
I
just
lost
it.
F
I
clicked
off
of
there,
so
the
public
hearing
you're
required
to
have
one
public
hearing
before
it
goes
to
council,
so
we'll
be
doing
that
and
then
the
council
is
required
to
do
two
public
hearings
after
they
get
it
so
the
november
18th
is
just
the
first,
so
the
public
has
an
opportunity
to
speak
at
council
and
looking
at
how
the
redistricting
was
done
in
the
past,
we
tend
to
get
more
comments
after
the
map
goes
to
council
a
lot
of
people.
F
Don't
don't
want
to
make
a
comment
ahead
of
time
because
they
don't
really
understand
what
they're
looking
at
or
what
they
should
be
saying.
So
once
it
goes
to
counsel,
people
tend
to
take
a
a
deeper
look
at
it
and
we
should
have
a
lot
of
public
comment
at
those
at
those
times,
but
I
wanted
to
put
this
on
the
screen.
F
So
if
you
haven't
clicked
the
link
to
look
at
it,
you'll
know
what
we're
doing
and
in
order
to
get
that
redistricting
done
by
november
18th,
it
has
to
be
to
council
by
november
5th,
which
means
the
last
thursday
you
could
do
anything
on.
This
is
really
october
28th.
F
So
what
we're
asking
is
we?
We
have
two
things
to
talk
about
with
public
schedule
and
kimmy's
here
to
answer
questions
about
and
to
kind
of
go
over
what
all
those
legal
schedules
are,
but
we
have
to
talk
about.
Do
we
want
to
hold
every
thursday
from
september
16th
through
november
4th
in
case
we
in
case
you
guys
can't
come
to
a
quick
consensus?
Maybe
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
discussion?
F
Do
we
want
to
hold
those
days
to
make
sure
we
have
something
done
in
time?
The
other
question
is,
we
do
have
one
member
who
is
a
teacher,
a
one
commission,
member
who's,
a
teacher
and
his
new
schedule
of
classes.
He
just
received
is
in
conflict
with
this
commission.
So
one
option
is
he
could
resign?
The
other
one
is
we'd
have
to
push
our
commission
meetings
to
start
around.
Seven
to
seven
thirty,
he
gets
out
of
class
at
7
15..
F
I
don't
know
if
that's
something
you
guys
want
to
do,
but
it's
something
you
might
want
to
talk
about.
He
is
prepared
to
resign
if,
if
necessary,
and
that
that
council
member
is
prepared
to
make
an
appointment,
if
should
he
need
to
resign?
D
Yeah,
I
can
review
the
redistricting
sort
of
the
mapping
pieces,
at
least
so
I'm
just
going
to
go
forward
unless
someone
stops
me.
So
the
data
from
the
statewide
database
with
the
prisoner,
reallocation
population
completed,
should
come
out
we're
anticipating
mid
to
late
september.
We
don't
have
a
firm
date
on
it.
The
census
data,
the
legacy
file-
was
actually
released
early
by
four
days,
but
that's
really
for
us
and
so
we're
just
waiting
on
the
statewide
database.
D
So,
however,
during
that
time
frame,
while
we're
waiting
for
the
statewide
database
and
also
for
that
21
day
waiting
period,
the
commission
can
certainly
look
at
community
of
interest
testimony
any
public
maps
that
were
submitted
all
of
that
data
and
to
get
some
ideas
of
where
sort
of
the
pressure
points
might
be
in
terms
of
community
of
interest.
We
as
demographers
simply
can't
map
until
that
21-day
waiting
period
is
over
and
give
you
anything
once
that
happens
once
those
21
days
are
up.
D
We
can
give
you
initial
maps
and
we
can
take
direction
from
you
in
terms
of
what
you'd
like
to
see
in
initial
draft
maps,
and
it
does
need
to
be
so.
D
Once
we
have
draft
maps
to
show
the
commission
they
do
need
to
be
published
seven
days
prior
to
the
meeting,
and
then
I
believe
that
that
and
then
I
don't
know
exactly
how
I
needed
tony's
input
here
on
this
one.
In
terms
of
how
many
rounds
of
mapping
the
commission
wants
to
go
through
prior
to
sending
the
recommendation
to
the
council
prior
to
that
november
deadline.
So
any
public
hearing
that
the
commission
has
the
maps
do
need
to
be
published
seven
days
in
advance,
which
is
a
little
bit
longer
than
brown
act.
F
F
B
Jimmy
I
have
a
question
for
you,
or
maybe
this
is
to
tony
whenever
we
do
these.
Have
these
any
suggestions
from
the
commission
for
communities
of
interest
to
be
added
to
a
draft
map
would
is
best
practice
to
have
each
revised
map
presented
to
the
public
or
do
these
drafts
are
they
intended
for
the
commissioner's
use
only.
D
E
Yes-
and
I
mean
if
it's
a
draft,
if
it
it's
still
a
working
draft,
it
may
not
be
public,
but
generally
speaking,
yes,
anything,
that's
that's
going
to
be
discussed
at
a
meeting
is
going
to
be
public
information.
B
D
B
Yes,
I
guess
I'm
wondering
the
time
frame
between
giraffes.
I
guess
we
couldn't
make
any
changes
to
draft
maps
without
a
meeting
right.
Tony
yes,
so
so
that's
part
of
your
question
about
leaving
the
these
thursdays
between
september
and
november
open
would
be
to
permit
time
to
to
have
a
meeting
to
hold
meetings
to
discuss
any
edits
or
additions
to
the
draft
map.
B
G
Thank
you,
I've
one
comment
and
a
question.
First,
my
comment
is
regarding
the
commissioner,
who
has
a
change
in
schedule.
I
would
be
in
favor
and
starting
later
at
perhaps
seven
o'clock
to
accommodate
that
commissioner's
schedule,
so
that
individual
can
remain
on
the
commission
and
I'll
be
interested
to
hear
the
feedback
from
the
rest
of
the
commissioners.
G
Second,
my
question
is
regarding
historically
how
many
rounds
are
there?
Typically,
as
far
as
with
the
map
development
granted,
it's
dependent
on
how
different
the
data
is
where
the
populations
have
shifted,
but
I
think
it
would
help
us
in
understanding
what
amount
of
time
resources
we
should
anticipate
leading
into
this
map,
drawing
process.
F
Question
don't
know
how
many,
how
many
public
hearings
they
had,
I'm
opening
the
file
now
to
see.
If
I
can
get
that
question
for
you
quickly,
I
think
and
mark
and
kimmy
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong.
I
have
written
on
my
calendar
that
we
cannot
draw
the
maps
until
october
15th,
so
that
would
leave
october
21st,
28th
and
possibly
november
4th,
if
I
could
turn
it
around
and
get
it
to
counsel
within
a
day.
The
21st
and
28th,
though,
would
be,
I
think,
the
two
public
hearing
dates.
E
Well,
I
can
weigh
in
I
don't
recall
the
specific
date
it's
dependent
on
when
the
data
was
released
and
when
the
state
anticipates
its
allocation
to
occur.
But,
generally
speaking,
yes,
there
is
a
time
in
october,
where
we
won't
be
able
to
release
maps
and
then
we'll
be
able
to
go
ahead
and
do
that
once
that
date
passes.
F
That's
why
I
want
you
guys
to
hold
your
thursdays,
so
we
can
be
flexible
based
on
when
we
get
the
data
fully
and
then
I
think,
can
we
use
it
21
days
before
we
keep
them
before.
We
can
actually
draw
maps
like
official
maps,
but
we
sounds
like
what
you
said
is
we
could
do
sort
of
unofficial
figuring
things
out.
A
D
The
21
days
is
to
allow
community
groups
and
other
folks
to
be
able
to
look
at
the
finalized
data
and
to
sort
of
examine
it.
So
we
as
demographers
can
draw
maps
during
that
time,
but
the
council
could
certainly
meet.
The
commission
could
certainly
meet
and
discuss
the
input
that
they've
received
and
if
they
have
particular
thoughts,
around
changes
in
lines
and
things
like
that
and
that's
feedback
that
we
can
take
in.
We
just
can't
map
anything
prior
to
the
21
days.
D
F
C
Would
they
go
on
the
website
for
the
city
or
you
know,
because
I've
heard
in
the
other
meetings
that
we've
had
with
the
community?
F
C
And
it
also
seems
like
we're
gonna
be
crunched
for
time,
because
we're
still
waiting
on
the
state
to
release
information
to
us,
so
I'm
like
lenka,
I'm
for
you
know
doing
what
we
have
to
do
to
to
make
this
happen
on
time,
but
I'm
still
somewhat
worried
that
the
community
won't
be
able
to
first
understand
what
they're
looking
at
and,
secondly
be
able
to
get
their
hands
on
that
information
to
take
back
to
their
various
community
groups
or
individual
homes.
F
Yeah,
so
the
person
on
saturday
who
raised
her
hand
in
person
and
spoke
and
said
she
didn't
understand
what
this
was,
and
I
did
talk
with
her
in
person.
You
know
after
the
meeting
was
over,
I
had
her
come
over
and
she
sat
down
with
the
computer
with
me,
and
I
I
talked
with
her
about
redistricting
is
that's
why
I
think
we
tend
to
get
a
lot
of
engagement
after
the
maps
are
drawn,
because
it's
it's
difficult
to
explain
to
people.
I
mean
I
think,
we've.
F
I
personally
think
we've
put
the
word
out
there
as
clear
as
we
can
make
it
on
what
the
communities
of
interest
is
and
what
redistricting
is
and
that
it's
something
that
we
have
to
do
every
10
years.
Her
thing
was
well.
If
it's
not
broken,
why
fix
it?
It's
like!
Well,
we
have
to
it's
it's
the
law.
We
have
to
draw
the
districts,
that's
what
she
didn't
understand.
Why
are
you
even
talking
about
this?
F
We
don't
need
to
redraw
districts
and
I
explained
to
her
we
do
legally
have
to
and
so
that
she
understood
she
ended
up,
leaving
very
happy.
You
know
understood
everything,
and
that
was
great.
I've
done
some
like
ask
me
anythings
on
zoom
to
but
like
the
last
one
I
did
nobody
showed
up
to
it
and
that's
a
like
I'm
the
city
clerk.
F
If
you
have
questions
about
redistricting
or
charter
review,
or
any
of
these
things,
please
come
and
I'll
answer
your
questions
in
person
and
they
they
just
don't
always
come,
and
I've
done
them
at
various
times
of
the
day.
I
do
get
some
people
coming
the
last
one.
I
think,
because
it's
the
summer
people
are,
people
are
having
fun,
especially
as
last
summer.
Nobody
could
have
fun
anywhere.
F
F
So
they
can
get
it
out
to
the
people
they
work
with,
as
well
as
the
neighborhood
organizations,
the
council
districts
and
anybody
who
sits
on
a
boarding,
commission
figuring
people
who
are
on
boards
of
commissions
tend
to
be
volunteers,
tend
to
have
a
lot
of
outreach
into
the
community.
So
that
will
be
going
out.
Probably
tomorrow.
E
Yeah.
Thank
you
a
lot
of
good
discussion,
but
I
just
want
to
kind
of
circle
back
to
what
is
actually
the
question
that
we're
being
our
questions
that
we're
being
asked
to
weigh
in
on
right
now,
because
I
feel
like
we're
getting
a
little
lost.
I
just
want
to
kind
of
address
specifically
tony's
questions
so
that
we
can
kind
of
move
forward
here.
F
F
In
october
we
will
have
to
meet
in
person
unless
the
brown
act
gets
extended,
and
I
from
what
I
understand,
the
governor's
not
planning
on
extending
the
brown
act
exemption
so
starting
in
october,
we
do
have
to
meet
in
person
for
some
people
meeting
in
person.
Seven
o'clock
is
a
better
start
time
because
they
can
get
home
from
work,
eat,
dinner
and
then
come
over
here.
For
some
people,
the
idea
of
starting
at
seven
and
going
to
like
10
o'clock
at
night
is
is
late.
So
that's
something
I
need
you
guys
to
discuss.
F
That's
the
decision.
We
could
keep
it
as
is,
or
we
can
move
and
move
to
a
seven
o'clock
start
time.
He
gets
out
of
class
at
7
15,
so
he
wouldn't
miss
the
beginning
of
the
meeting,
but
would
be
able
to
join
after
that.
E
E
F
In
person,
meetings
would
be
if
we
were
to
hold
every
thursday
you're.
Looking
at
four
thursdays
in
october
and
potentially
november
4th,
I
would
I
hope
we
don't
have
to
go
to
november
4th
because
that's
a
24-hour
turnaround
to
get
a
memo
to
counsel
so
we're
looking
at
october,
7th
14th,
21st
and
28th.
F
E
F
I
think
that
that's
up
to
you,
I
think
you
probably
should
do
at
least
two
yeah.
You
guys
might
all
be
in
agreement,
but
you
probably
you'll
need
to
have
at
least
two
one
to
draw
the
maps
and
then
one
to
have
a
public
hearing.
F
I
don't
know,
that's
I'm
not
quite
sure.
I
think
I
need
advice
from
kimmy
and
mark
on
that,
because
I
know
that
it's
the
data
of
when
we're
able
to
start
doing
that.
That
is
the
like.
If
I,
if
october
15th,
maybe
was
a
worst
case
scenario,
I
have
that
written
on
my
calendar.
That
would
mean
the
21st
and
the
28th
would
be
the
two
days.
We
would
do
it,
but
it
sounds
like
we
might
be
able
to
do
it
sooner.
F
D
So
my
suggestion
would
be
to
look
at
it
in
terms
of
sort
of
iterations
of
this.
So
if
you
were
going
to
hold
one
or
two
meetings
prior
to
a
draft
math,
then
you
would
be
able
to
sort
of
prioritize
any
community
of
interest,
information
or
feedback
that
you've
received,
as
well
as
develop
some
ideas
around
what
you
might
want
to
see
in
a
draft
map.
If
you
had
any
changes
that
might
take
one
meeting.
D
If
I
take
two,
I
don't
it's
hard
again,
it's
hard
to
tell
from
sitting
here
and
then
I
would
say
you
would
want
at
least
two
meetings
to
go
over
any
draft
maps,
because
I'm
assuming
that
the
first
meeting
is
the
first
time
you'll
see
them.
You
may
have
changes.
You
may
have
tweaks
to
lines
things
like
that.
You
may
want
to
elevate
one
set
of
maps
over
another
those
kinds
of
things,
so
I
would
say
you
would
at
least
need
at
least
two
meetings
in
order
to
get
through
that.
F
D
Yeah-
and
I
would
say
you
can
absolutely
do
all
of
the
pieces
around
looking
at
the
input
that
you've
received
in
community
of
interest
pieces
and
areas
that
you
might
like
to
see
included
or
excluded
in
maps
things
like
that.
All
of
those
pieces
you
can
do
without
us,
giving
you
a
draft
map
to
look
at.
F
I
E
F
I
would
like
I
would
like
to
know
about
the
start
time.
That's
that's
what
you
know
he's
fully
prepared
to
resign.
He
knows
it's,
okay,
that
whoever
we
have,
if,
if
you
guys,
can't
move
it
to
seven,
so
I
need
to
know
if
six
o'clock
is
what
you
want
to
stick
with.
F
It
can
last
a
half
an
hour.
So
I
think
if
we
actually
plan
to
have
meetings
on
the
23rd
and
30th,
that's
in
addition
to
your
regular
one
on
september
16th.
F
E
A
F
Exactly
and
I
do
have
public
speakers
on
this
item.
H
The
the
the
entire
process
by
which
we
are
defining
democracy
in
the
city
is
sorely
lacking
and
and
what
the
senora
just
stated
right
now
is
a
prime
example
of
that
is
the
fact
that
she
needs
to
ask
whether
or
not
it
is
a
part
of
the
democratic
process
as
to
whether
or
not
a
citizen
that
is
going
to
live
under
the
context
in
which
she
is
making
a
decision
upon.
H
She
is
unfit
to
sit
in
a
decision-making
capacity
over
my
life,
that
is
the
problem,
I'm
getting
real
sick
and
tired
of
all
of
this
faux
democracy,
and
this
faux
republicanism,
because
you
do
not
serve
the
needs
of
the
constituencies
that
live
in
the
city.
Where
are
the
chicano
issues
in
these
conversations?
Where
the?
Where
is
the
equity,
with
respect
to
these
historical
injustices?
That
chicanos
have
had
to
live
with
for
at
least
100
years
in
this
city
and
sit
there
and
listen
to
you
every
single
week.
Listen
to
you,
I'm
sick
of
it.
J
Oh,
thank
you
so
much
30
seconds
is
that
all
I
have
is
there.
It
is.
Thank
you,
okay,
good!
Thank
you!
Sweetie
yeah!
Well,
the
thing
that
bothers
me
the
most
and
we
I
hear
it
all
the
time
is.
Oh,
I
would
like
it
to
be
virtual.
I
would
like
it
to
be
virtual
yeah.
J
We
need
you,
you
know,
as
our
representatives
and
I
know
all
of
the
people
you
know
I
just
heard
it
in
this
meeting.
Oh
it'd
be
nice.
If
it
was
virtual,
oh
my
you
know,
I
have
a
two-year-old
a
four-year-old.
You
know
it's
hard
to
do
these
meetings
and
and
then
you're
going
to
demand
that
we
come
in
to
see
all
and
then
we
have
kovit.
J
You
know
I
mean
this
is
this,
is
this
is
insane
and
we
really
need
you
to
work
on
that
and
all
of
us
need
to
contact
governor
newsom
to
declare
you
know.
The
thing
is:
we've
all
declared
a
climate
crisis
and
we
need
to
have
transformational
change,
and
this
is
what
it
is.
This
is
what
transformational
change
looks
like
us
us
working
from
our
homes.
You
know
to
be
part
of
our
democracy
to
not
burn
fossil
fuels.
To
get
together.
You
know
we
have
to
start
living
with
our
loved
ones,
and
you
know
so.
J
We
don't
have
to
drive
and
fly
to
see
them,
but
this
is
another
part
of
it
is
being
part
of
our
democracy,
and-
and
you
know
he
he
we
need
that
to
change,
and
we
need
everybody's
help
to
make
that
so
to
write
our
governor
to
say
you
know
he
did
it
under
the
crisis
of
covid.
Well,
our
crisis
now
is
climate
crisis,
and
you
know
it
always
was
climate
crisis,
but
you
know
this
is
where
we
need
to
really
make
sure
it
stays
virtual.
I
Blair
beekman,
I
just
wanted
to
quickly
offer
and
remind
the
importance
of
open
public
practices
with
these
meeting
processes
and
whatever
you
can
do
to
make
the
public
process
open
and
how
to
look
for
those
ways
that
it
can
be
open.
It's
important
and
helpful
and
yeah
there's
issues
with
the
charter
commission
process
that
the
subcommittee
process
could
be
a
little
bit
more
open
in
some
ways
and
how
to
how
that
can
happen.
I
It's
important
to
to
ask
and
and
to
look
for
that
and
and
for,
however,
that
may
apply
for
this
for
this
set
of
meetings
and
their
public
meetings.
Good
luck,
how
we
can
look
for
simple
things
as
as
the
minutes
process,
how
that
can
be
recorded
and
and
and
then
offered
to
the
everyday
public,
and
it's
the
little
things
so
good
luck,
how
we
can
work!
This
fall
on
such
issues
and
and
good
luck
to
our
open
democratic
practices.
They're,
positive
and
good
luck!
A
C
A
F
Yes,
we
should,
I
think,
hopefully,
by
september
16th,
we'll
have
firmer
dates
on
on
that.
So
we'll
know
what
we
can
do
for
the
last,
the
last
two
public
hearings
and
we
could
also
start
talking
about
the
communities
of
interest
that
you've
already
received.
You
won't
have
gone
through
districts,
four
and
five.
I
wanted
to
give
an
update
on
four
and
five.
I
know
for
district
five.
There
was
a
request
to
have
it
at
a
different
location
to
move
it
to
a
different
location.
F
I
have
to
get
contracts
and
insurance
exemptions,
so
we've
kept
it
at
the
community
center.
I
have
made
an
offer
to
to
a
school
to
come
talk
to
a
pta.
F
So
if
you
guys
have
a
neighborhood
organization
or
pta
of
a
group
that
you
know
is
underserved,
let
me
know,
and
I
can
go,
I
can
talk
to
them.
It
won't
be
the
formal
presentation,
but
I
can
go
and
show
them.
The
district
are
software,
so
that's
an
offer
that
I've
made,
because
I
know
for
some
people
it
just
might
be
helpful
to
have
somebody
who
can
go
over
it.
F
I
can't
do
every
day
of
the
week,
because
I'm
in
all
of
the
council
and
council
committee
meetings,
but
I
can
do
evenings
most
days
an
occasional
morning-
I
can
also
go
in
via
zoom.
B
Okay-
and
we
can
just
send
you
an
email
with
our
suggestions-
okay,
okay,
so
just
just
to
clarify
and
confirm
our
next
redistricting
commission
meeting
will
be
by
zoom
on
september,
16
2021
at
our
new
time,
seven
o'clock,
or
does
that
one
stay
at
six?
Okay,
it'll
be
seven
okay,
seven
o'clock,
and
then
we
have
two
public
hearings
on
saturday
this
upcoming
saturday.
We
will
start
on
august
21st
at
10
a.m,
at
the
cambrian
community
center
for
district
9
and
then
at
2
p.m,
at
the
almaden
community
center
in
district
10..
B
Moving
on
to
our
next
item,
9
public
comment
open
forum.
This
is
the
time
for
public
comment
on
items
that
are
not
on
the
agenda.
The
brown
act
prohibits
the
commission
from
discussing
any
item.
That's
not
agendized.
Each
speaker
will
be
given
two
minutes.
If
the,
if
a
member
of
the
public
wishes
to
speak,
they
can
raise
their
hand,
can
the
clerk
please
call
the
speakers,
paul
soto,.
H
That's
my
pedigree:
that's
where
I'm
from
in
january,
6,
18
1851
peter
burnett,
gave
a
speech
right
there
at
what
the
jazz
festival
was
conducted.
All
that
area
that
was
the
california
legislature,
building
the
first
state
capital
of
this
country
of
this
state
as
a
part
of
the
united
states-
and
I
quote
peter
burnett,.
H
H
They
were
ghouls,
that's
what
they
called
them
ghouls
and
they
went
into
the
graves
they
dug
up.
Mexican
heads
presented
them
to
men
like
thomas
fallon,
presented
them
to
the
mayors
of
san
jose
to
get
five
dollars
per
head,
25
cents
per
scalp,
and
I
will
challenge
anybody
on
this
council
to
challenge
me
on
my
research
challenge
me.
I
dare
you
I
dare
you.
This
is
getting
sickening,
I'm
sick
and
tired
of
it
and
I'm
not
going
to
tolerate
it
anymore.
I
guarantee
you.
H
J
Okay,
well,
thank
you
paul,
for
you
know,
educating
us
about
our
history
and
what
our
city
charter,
that
you
know
we're
all
working
under
for
all
the
work
that
we're
doing,
even
in
the
redistricting
that
you're
looking
at
and
that
it's
based
on
a
lot
of
theft-
and
you
know-
and
and
I
guess
I
call
it-
evil-
immoral,
selfish
and
greedy
behavior
from
our
ancestors-
and
you
know
how
are
we
you
know
right
now.
J
You
know
with
our
climate
crisis
there
that
say
we
need
trans.
The
science
says
we
need
transformational
change,
that
cares
about
humans
and
the
other
earthlings,
so
we
don't
go
extinct.
I
mean
that
is
the
place
we're
at
now,
and
so
it
is
really
a
care,
caring
economy
that
we
have
to
change,
and
you
know
everything
about
our
you
know.
J
The
current
political
agendas
is
about
keeping
on
growth
going
business
as
usual,
and
so
we
have
a
lot
of
challenges
to
take,
and
we
really
have
to
you
know,
and
that's
what
you
know
and
paul
is
saying
you
know
that
the
lands
were
stolen
from
the
natives
and
that's
what
I'm
asking
for
too.
In
terms
of
climate
change
that
we
need
to
land
back,
that
kind
of
redistricting,
we
need
to
land
back
and
to
to
change
the
general
plan
that
supports
hotels.
J
You
know
that
that
is
the
type
of
change
we
need
to.
We
need,
like
the
science
says,
all
open.
You
know
we
shouldn't
be
building
anymore,
we
shouldn't
be
building
and
we
need.
You
know
we
should
be
de-growing,
that's
what
we
have
to
do
to
go
to
zero.
Fossil
fuels,
not
net
zero,
zero,
and
so
you
know-
and
it
means
that
we
have
to
that
means
the
food
isn't
coming
in
on
18
wheelers
or
even
our
farmers
market.
We
have
to
take
the
open
lands
and
turn
them
into
the
valley
of
hearts.
I
Thanks
for
paul's
words,
he
provides
a
lot
of
history
of
of
san
jose
and
you
know
we're
now
at
a
time
with
things
like
the
charter
commission
process,
we
are
more
considering
the
ideas
of
equity,
reimagine
and
and
actually
open
democratic
practices,
which
I
hope
we
can
start.
I
hope
that
term
can
be
more
brought
into
the
future.
Words
of
equity
and
reimagine
they're
doing
some
interesting
work
at
the
charter
commission
process,
and
I
wish
some
luck
there.
I
It's
it's
hard
work
to
to
bring
about
a
a
people's
voice
and
a
community
voice
to
a
process
that
was
initially
started
to
invent
redevelopment
for
the
mayor.
Basically,
and-
and
so
the
mayor
could
have
a
clear
and
clear
path
to
redevelopment
issues,
and
I
think
we're
trying
to
say
no
to
that.
I
hope
we
can
continue
those
efforts
how
that
relates
to
this
commission.
I
Just
thank
you
that
you
are
I'm
you're,
considering
the
same
issues
in
this
new
era
of
what
can
be
equity,
reimagined
and
open
democratic
practices.
I
think
those
three
things
are
going
to
play
an
important
role
in
the
next
decade
and
can
actually
provide
us
a
lot
of
hope
in
this
really
difficult
time,
we're
in
a
covid
a
quick
reminder
once
again
that
you
know
it's
my
understanding
that
we
possibly
may
have
some
serious
natural
disaster
issues
in
the
bay
area
in
the
next
two
to
five
to
ten
years.