►
Description
City of San José, California
Redistricting Advisory Commission Special Meeting of November 8, 2021
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=902293&GUID=C0AD7A29-7D39-441D-AB9B-BAEBFD031A1D
E
A
A
So
we
go
straight
to
the
public
hearing
and,
like
many
of
the
commissioners,
have
excluding
myself
they're
going
to
hold
we're
gonna
pull
the
public
hearing
on
the
plans
that
we
have
before
us
and
just
want
to
remind
folks
that
we
have
three
plans:
three
maps-
I
should
say
before
us
at
this
point
in
time
and
they
are
attached
to
the
agenda
redistricting
partners.
A
I
will
give
you
the
floor,
but
before
I
do
that,
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that,
to
your
knowledge,
the
maps
that
are
attached
to
the
agenda
or
the
correct
maps
and
and
that
and
that
you
have
those
available
for
for
folks
to
view
in
case.
We
need
you
to
bring
those
up.
F
I
do
I
have
them
ready.
The
maps
that
are
attached
to
the
agenda
are
the
ones.
I
believe
that
we
approved
last
night
last
time.
On
thursday
I
apologize
I
I
was
thinking
this
was
at
seven
and
it,
of
course,
is
at
six,
so
I'm
ready
and
can
pull
up
the
binders
that
we
for
each
of
the
plans
and
we
can
go
through
them.
However,
you'd
like.
F
A
Yeah,
I
would,
I
would
just
suggest
that
we
we
go
through
each
one,
just
in
the
order
that
they're
on
the
on
the
agenda,
I'm
not
sure
if
anyone
else
would
have
any
other
preference.
At
this
point.
E
E
A
D
F
Sure
so
let
me
just
start
with
I'll
just
start
with
the
overview
map
of
d4,
so
this
is
plan
d4.
This
came
out
of
the
c3
series.
I
think
we've
had
d
d2,
d3
and
d4,
and
so
this
is
a
map
that
we've
come
to
each
the
end
of
each
evening
to
to
move
move
lines
within
between
the
districts
based
on
community
event,
community
input
and
from
commission
driven
discussions.
F
This
is
the
overview
map
where
you
can.
You
can
just
basically
see
the
the
freeways
and
the
major
streets.
The
next
page
is
the
current
lines
overlaid
with
the
the
proposed
divisional,
the
district
descriptions
in
black,
and
so
I
think
I'll
just
go
through
them
from
current
lines.
To
current
to
this
draft,
you
can
see
that
districts,
one
district
1,
doesn't
change
very
much
at
all.
F
District
3
in
this
configuration
has
lost
population
at
the
southern
southern
border,
district,
six
and
seven
for
population
equality,
because
we
remember,
as
we
remember,
d3
and
d4,
both
were
the
two
most
overpopulated
districts
in
their
current
configurations,
so
d4
also
lost
population
or
district.
Four
excuse
me.
You
can
see,
though,
that
as
we
did
last
time,
penitencia
creek
and
barry
s
are
all
whole
within
district.
F
Four
district
five
has
pretty
much
picked
up
part
of
the
north,
the
southern
portion
of
district
four,
but
it's
picked
up
from
district
8.
The
ocala
neighborhood
district
6
is
is
in
a
similar
configuration,
but
it
has.
District
9
has
moved
a
little
bit
north
to
incorporate
or
sorry
district
6
has
moved
a
little
bit
south
to
incorporate
northern
part
of
district
nine.
It
has
also
moved
out,
and
in
the
last
change
taken
in
mass,
the
mastic
neighborhood.
F
I
can't
remember
its
full
name,
I'm
sorry
a
good
year
good
year.
Thank
you.
District
7,
as
well
has
picked
up
a
little
bit
of
district
3
because
again
district
3
was
overpopulated.
F
District
8
is
is
very
close
to
its
current
lines,
but
has
picked
up
a
little
bit
of
district.
Seven.
Nine
has
picked
up
the
communications
hill
portion.
No,
no!
That's
in
ten,
I'm
sorry,
communications,
hills
and
ten,
and
in
nine
you
see
it's
picked
up
a
little
bit
of
six
for
population
equality.
F
You
can
see
this
is
the
neighborhood
overlays.
We
do
split
some
neighborhoods,
but
we've
been
very,
I
think,
very
good
at
focusing
in
on
neighborhood
splits
and
trying
to
unify
them
in
one
district
or
another.
We
spent
a
lot
of
time
last
time
on
thursday,
focusing
focusing
in
on
the
district
679
areas
and
also
again
unifying
penitentiary,
creek
neighborhood
into
district
4..
F
The
next
plan
is
it:
do
you
want
to
do
unity
next
or
the
community
3.0.
F
I
have
unity
up
next,
so
how
about
I
just
jump
there?
Let's
do
that.
I
think
unity,
three
or
unity
plan
from
1027.
F
It
has
the
most
changes
from
the
current
lines
and
I
think
you
can
see
that
best.
When
we
do
the
overlay
of
the
current
lines,
you
can
see
that
district
one
is
now
moved
north
into
district
six
and
take
in
the
northwest
port
portion
of
san
jose
district.
Six.
I'm
just
gonna
go
kind
of
across
district.
Six
has
grown
into
kind
of
the
downtown
area
it
doesn't
take
in
the
airport,
wait,
no,
it
does
take
in
the
airport
and
it
loops
down
with
district
3
coming
into
it
over
the
freeway.
F
It
also
has
this
long
arm
down
into
nine,
to
allow
nine
to
come
up
and
take
like
the
willow
glen
area
in
so
that's
like
a
very
different
kind
of
like
architecture
for
the
west
side
of
san
jose.
F
F
Is
I
apologize
for
that
error
in
this
map,
but
district
10
and
two
have
really
kind
of
split
territory,
with
district
10
taking
coyote
and
like
the
south
southwestern
portion
and
and
in
district
2,
taking
like
the
d4
map
taking
coyote
the
coyote
area
valley
area
from
district
8,
but
also
having
like
kind
of
three
tendrils
into
district
current
district
9.
Indeed,
current
district
10
and
well
and
and
somewhat
this
just
different
configuration,
and
then
I
think
you
can
see
the
biggest
one
of
the
biggest
changes
is
district
3.
F
It
was
overpopulated,
so
it
did
have
to
lose
territory,
but
in
the
unity
map
configuration
it
loses
a
lot
of
downtown,
it
loses
the
airport
it
grows
into
district.
Four.
His
district
four
of
course
has
to
shrink-
and
I
guess
it's
eastside
is-
is
very
similar
to
its
current
lines.
District
four
because
it
had
to
shrink,
has
lost
part
of
its
western
border,
but
in
just
in
the
unity
plan.
Penitentiary
creek
is
whole
with
berryessa
district.
Five
is
in
a
similar
construction
to
its
current
lines.
F
You
can
see
it
picks
up
a
little
bit
of
four
and
and
also
the
ocala
neighborhood
and
district
7
is
almost
exactly
the
same
as
it
is
now
currently
and
district
8
is
very
similar.
It
just
lost
his
loss,
cody
valley
and
ocala.
F
So
you
can.
This
is
the
neighborhood
overlay,
I
think
if
we
really
want
to
get
into
neighborhood
splits,
we
should
go
into
maptitude
and
we
can
look
at
different
borders
because
I
think
that
and
we
can
drill
down
into
the
street
levels
and
then
finally,
we
have
the
community
map,
which,
in
a
lot
of
ways,
is,
is
similar
to
d4
I'll.
Try
to
point
out
some
of
the
differences.
F
You
can
see
that
penitentiary
creek
is
whole
and
they've
made
it
made
the
penitencia
border,
the
the
floor
of
district
four
and
move
district
three
a
little
bit
more
into
into
district
four
district,
one
and-
and
one
is
basically
the
same-
I
think
it's
identical
to
district
four
district.
Six,
the
biggest
difference
is
they've
taken
in
this
peninsula
down
along
the
freeway
and
and
also
this
line
along
the
bottom
is
is
pretty
similar
to
district
4
as
well.
F
But
again,
there
is
slight
differences
in
this
area
of
the
map
10
in
there
in
the
unity
map
has
moved
in
and
taken
into
communications
hill
like
d4,
they
do
a
similar
split
in
coyote
in
between
into
two
from
eight
district.
Five,
the
the
reason
for
this
difference
is:
they
incorporate
both
the
fruit,
the
airport
and
the
ocala
neighborhood.
I
believe
this
is
the
neighborhood
portion
or
the
airport
portion
into
district
five.
F
Those
are
the
major
differences
between
between
the
community
plan
and
the
d4
map,
but
I
think
if
we
want
to
get
into
more
details,
we
can
we
can
use
maptitude
to
get
into
the
specifics.
F
I
don't
know
if
you
and
one
thing
I
did
not
do
in
any
of
this
and
I
apologize
was-
I
didn't
get
into
the
data
tables.
So
let
me
let
me
do
that.
So
this
is
the
d4
plan.
You
can
see
that
it's
well.
It
should
not
be
at
ten
point
four
percent,
but
it
looks
like
one
of
the
things
that
we
may
have
to
look
at
is
the
swap
to
to
make
penitentiary
creek
hole
in
d4
may
have
brought
us
over
deviation.
So
we
need
to
look
at
that.
F
If
we
want
to
go
forward
with
d4,
you
can
see
that
the
asian
c-vap
is
that
the
majority
minority
district
is
wait.
I
I
totally
I'm
sorry.
I
need
to
slow
down
so
the
total
deviation
of
district
of
d
d4
six
is
fine
percent,
plus
two
point
four
percent.
So
it's
at
eight
point.
Five
percent
total
deviation
so
we're
okay.
I
apologize
for
that
skipping
a
heartbeat
like
I
did
when
I
said
it.
I'm
sorry,
I
think
again.
F
We
also
have
an
influence
district
in
district
7
at
47
percent,
latino
or
asian,
and
then
we
have
the
latino
district
at
46..
The
influences
are
at
46.7
is
district
5.
you'll,
see
in
all
of
these
plans
that
those
same
districts
have
influence
and
majority
minority
districts.
Just
the
percentages
are
slightly
different.
F
F
The
overall
deviation
of
this
plan
is
8.7,
so
very
close
to
the
d4
8.5
and
then
finally,
the
community
plan
has
a
total
deviation
of
9.6.
Plus
3.2
is
9.2.
F
I'm
just
want
to
do
the
math
in
front
of
you,
so
you
guys
can
see
the
api
influen
majority
minority
districts
are
again
in
district
4
with
56.5
percent
and
54.2
percent.
The
influence
district
is
less
than
the
unity
plan
around
the
same
as
the
d4
plane
at
46.4
percent
and
then
their
latino
cvap
is
right
in
between
the
unity
map
and
the
d4
map
at
47.9
in
district
5.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
chris
does
anyone
have
any
any
clarifying
questions
before
we
move
forward?
I
I
had
I
had
one
at
least
chris,
if
I
could,
of
course,
on
on
the
community
map,
if
you
could,
if
you
could
bring
that
up
again,
I
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
we
were
looking
at
the
right
map,
because
I
I
thought
I
remember
a
few
changes
to
that
map.
A
F
Was
one
that
was
that
was
sent
back
to
us
like
I
had
posted
the
wrong
version
of
it,
and
so
I
reran
it
directly
from
district
or
I
don't
know
if
there'd
been
changes
on
the
night
of
or
or
what
have
you,
but
this
was
the
the
plan
directly
from
their
district
or
site
so
and
and
they
emailed
us
with
that
number
and
saying
this-
is
our
the
final
3.0
map.
A
A
Okay,
only
because
I'm
I'm
looking
at
the
map
that
was
attached
to
the
agenda
and
it's
actually
a
little
different
for
the
community
map,
so
with
that
said,
you
know
we
aren't
going
to
be
voting
on
any
final.
You
know
making
any
final
decisions
tonight
so,
but
I
I
think
the
the
community
map
that's
attached
to
the
agenda
is
a
little
different,
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
talking
about
the
the
same
one.
A
But
but
if
you're
saying
that
this
is
the
latest
information,
you
have
the
one
that
you
have
on
your
screen
right
now,
then
then,
that's
the
one
that
we
should
probably
discuss.
F
Yeah
terrify
that
one
tony,
if
I
don't
know
if,
if
you
want
to
correct
me,
I.
H
Yeah,
thank
you
yeah.
I
know
we
had
some
something
wasn't
quite
right
on
the
weekend,
so
we
put
a
temporary
one
up
and
then
I
know
we
sent
you
the
the
map
number
for
ours.
I
think
it
was
seven
five,
two
three
four,
and
so
I
think
hopefully
that's
the
one
you
pulled
chris.
I
think
75234.
F
Okay,
I
you're
right
chair
and-
and
I
apologize
I
did
pull
them
on
binder.
Oh,
we.
A
Well,
yeah
that
one
looks
more
consistent
with
what
was
attached
to
the
agenda.
Okay,
yeah.
G
This
is
commissioner.
Yes,
that
looks
correct
when
we
added
the
neighborhoods
at
the
south.
Excuse
me
south
end
of
district
3
into
district.
E
F
H
D
Chris,
I
have
a
question
for
you
as
our
resident
redistricting
expert.
You
know
our
overarching
purpose
as
a
commission
is
to
develop
and
propose
city
council
district
maps
that
ensure
fair
representation
of
san
jose's
communities
in
their
local
government.
So
when
we
as
a
commission,
are
considering
these
three
different
maps,
what
should
we
be
looking
for
in
terms
of
any
signs
that
there
may
be
purposeful
dilution
of
of
any
group
of
their
vote?
F
F
F
But
I
think
the
biggest
thing
is
list
thinking
back
and
trying
to
remember
all
of
the
input
you've
received
from
the
public
and
then
also
thinking
through
your
knowledge
base
of
the
city
of
san
jose,
you've
all
lived
and
worked,
and
in
the
city
and
you've
been
appointed
by
you've
been
appointed
to
basically
be
a
representative
as
of
your
district.
So
thinking
through
the
community
of
interest
testimony
your
knowledge
base,
the
district
that
you're
representing,
I
think
that's
the
balancing
act
that
you
have
to
go
through
to
make
the
best
recommendations.
F
I
guess
on
changing
maps
and
then
recommending
maps
to
the
city
council.
That's
what
I
would
I
think
be
focused
on
as
you
as
you
go
forward.
D
Thank
you
chris
for
that,
because
for
the
district
that
I'm
representing
district
10,
I
get
a
little
concerned
when
I
see
very
different
lines
being
drawn
in
the
unity
map
which,
from
the
testimony
we've
received
from
those
who
are
current
residents
of
district
10,
as
well
as
even
from
nearby
districts
who
have
concerns
about
some
of
the
changes
in
the
lines
being
drawn,
that
I
am
trying
to
pay
very
close
attention
of
keeping
these
communities
of
interest
together.
A
Okay,
we'll
move
on
to
commissioner
did
loveson.
I
Thank
you
so
chris,
I
think
I
asked
this
question
last
week,
just
because
I
like
to
make
sure
that
I'm
understanding
all
the
data
as
we
do
move
through
it
a
little
bit
quickly
so
across
the
three
maps
that
we
have
now
whittled
it
down
to
my
understanding
is
that
the
majority
minority
districts
are
effectively
the
same
with
some
very
minor
percentage.
Differences
amongst
the
three
maps,
as
well
as
the
influence
districts,
are
identical
across
the
three
maps
again
with
some
minor
fluctuation
in
percentages.
Is
that
correct,
yeah.
F
The
influence
districts
and
the
majority
of
minority
stickers
are
the
same
numbers
in
all
three
plans
and,
as
we
pointed
out,
there
is
a
slight
variation
in
the
asian
cvap
numbers
and
the
latino
cvap
number
in
district
five,
but
they're
all
very
similar.
I
And
then
one
other
question
I
had
is
so
the
in
the
deviations
I
have
eight
and
a
half
on
d4.
What
I
refer
to
as
kind
of
the
commission
map,
because
the
genesis
of
that
was
us
instructing
you
to
create
a
minimal
change
map
from
the
current
boundaries,
which
then
created
the
c3
series
and
then
from
there
we
made
changes
that
went
into
the
d
with
each
commissioner
kind
of
moving
lines
based
on
the
coi
testimony
and
our
own
knowledge
of
the
districts
and
those
iterations
built.
I
So
I'm
going
to
refer
to
it
as
the
commission's
map,
because
it's
kind
of
hard
we
have
other
maps
with
names
on
them
and
then
d4
confuses
me
at
least
so
commission's
map.
I
have
an
eight
and
a
half
percent
deviation
unity
map.
I
have
an
8.7
percent
deviation
and
the
community
map
is
a
9.2
percent
deviation.
Is
that
correct.
F
Sorry
this
is
the
dip.
This
is
the
the
other
community
map
which
I
think
they've
they've
changed
their
deviation.
So
I
apologize
again.
It
is
at
seven
point
nine
seven
point:
nine.
I
A
Commissioner
sidbury
did
you
want
to
comment
on
something
or
ask?
I
have
a
question.
C
Well,
well,
I'm
having
problems
with
my
system.
It
continues
to
stay
on
the
live
transaction,
the
translation,
so
I'm
hoping
that
you
can
hear
me.
Can
you
hit
me?
Yes,
we
can.
Okay.
Maybe
I
have
to
log
back
out
and
sorry
and
come
back
in
because
I'm
getting
chris
from
english
with
and
and
some
english
from
you,
but
then
it
goes
back
to
live
translation
and
I
guess
that's
vietnamese.
C
So
if
you
can
give
me
a.
B
C
B
Wait
wait
hold
on.
This
is
true.
C
A
Does
anyone
else
have
any
comments
or
questions
on
the
initial
overview
that
was
provided
by
chris.
A
No,
so
I
have
a
question
for
the
city
attorney.
A
You
know
because,
because
I
we've
heard
that
some
members
of
the
community
and
talk
about
you
know
voter
suppression
and
and
and
purposeful
actions
that
may
result
in
inequities
and
but
the
acts
of
of
redistricting,
don't
necessarily
have
to
be
purposeful,
correct
in
order
for
them
to
be
inequitable.
A
Okay
and
then
another
question
I
have
is:
can
can
an
entire
city
map
be
invalidated
because
of
the
effects
that
the
redistricting
has
on
one
particular
council
district.
J
A
Okay
meeting
yeah,
I
yeah-
I
I'd
appreciate
that,
and-
and
I
can
I
can
just
say
that
look
the
reason
I'm
asking
these
questions
is
because-
and
I
know
I'm
coming
in
into
this
late
in
the
game,
but
just
to
be
real,
honest
with
you.
A
I
am,
I
am
very
concerned
with
what's
going
on
on
the
southern
end
of
district
3.,
you
have
four
possibly
five
if
you
count
tamiya
and
as
a
separate
neighborhood,
heavily
latino
districts
that
are
not
only
being
taken
out
of
district
three
they're
being
split
and
put
into
three
other
districts,
so
you
have
two
neighborhoods
going
into
district
six.
A
Potentially
you
have
one
stain
and
three,
and
then
you
have
two
going
into
district
seven,
and
I
I'm
concerned
about
that
that
that
you
have
this
sort
of
group
of
neighborhoods
that
are
heavily
latino.
That
would
that
whose
you
know
political
power
potentially
could
be.
You
know,
diluted
by
moving
them
into
three
separate
districts.
A
So
if
I
don't
have
a
solution
for
that,
I
know
that
they're
talking
about
a
lot
of
numbers
here
and
looking
at
how
the
populations
were
being
moved
back
and
forth.
The
last
time
yeah
I
you
know,
I
began
to
become
aware
of
how
difficult
this
is,
and
but
I
just
wanted
to
raise
that
as
a
concern
that
that
I
have
and
that
and
that
these
these
neighborhoods
having
having
worked
in
these
neighborhoods
before
I
know
that
they're,
like
I
said
last
time,
there's
a
lot
of
synergy
between
these.
A
G
Thank
you
chairpuzzo.
I
do
want
to
echo
your
comments
on
in
regards
to
the
southern
end
of
district
three
in
regards
to
spartan
keys,
goodyear,
mastic
tamian,
and
you
know
that
the
washington
guadalupe
washington
neighborhoods
we
did
advocate
originally
to
try
to
keep
these
neighborhoods
in
district
3..
However,
with
goodyear
mastic,
they
are
that
district
3
district
7
split,
so
it
would
be
ideal
to
keep
them
either
all
in
district
7
or
somehow
keep
them,
as
is
with
the
d3
d7
split
as
they
currently
are.
G
Last
week
we
also
mentioned
you
know
we
could
put
taymian.
I
believe
it
was
goodyear
mastic
into
district.
Six
to
try
to
you
know,
keep
those
neighborhoods
that
are
very
very
tightly
knit
somehow
together,
although
we
are
splitting
them
apart.
So
it's
very
complex,
as
we
all
know,
I
did
get
to
see
some
feedback
through
emails
from
spartan
keys,
so
they
have
expressed
interest
to
say,
stay
and
remain
in
district
three,
which
is
going
to
be
complex
in
itself,
because
that
means
for
our
d4
map.
G
E
Thank
you.
So,
commissioner
puzo,
you
brought
up
a
point
also
that
I
would
like
to
ask
the
city
attorney.
We
received
one
of
the
letters
of
the
public
was
talking
about
voter
disenfranchisement
with
regard
to
what
we
read
district
and
if
a
particular
council
member
is
all
of
a
sudden
out
of
that
district,
I
mean
when
we
read,
but
yet
we're
not
supposed
to
redistrict
with
the
political
alignment.
E
J
J
E
A
C
Yes,
you
can
continue.
Mr
rizzo.
A
D
Okay,
are
you
asking
if
you
would
like
us
to
start
looking
at
the
maps
and
redrawing
lines?
Is
that
what.
A
A
If
you
could
pull
up
the
the
draft
map
d4
and
commissioner
de
leveson,
I
I
I
totally
get
it
the
d4
thing
I
kept
thinking
about
district
four
every
time
I
saw
that
and
read
it
and
heard
it,
and
so,
if
you
want
to
for
purposes
of
the
next
meeting,
I
think
you
were
referring
to
it
as
a
commission's
map
draft
map.
F
This
is
the
d4
map,
where
we
left
it
up
what
left
off
on
thursday
and
is
the
pdf
same
as
the
pdf
version
you
have.
F
The
current
lines,
so
one
of
the
one
of
the
well
it
was
split.
It
was
split
kind
of
one
third,
two
thirds
roughly
yeah
e
into
d6
and
d3,
and
you
can
see
that
the
line.
F
I
think
goes
down
like
this,
and
then
it
had
part
of
spartan
keys
and
part
of
well.
I
I
think
I
always
called
name
this
area
wrong,
so
it
split
this
neighborhood
here
in
between
district
seven
and
three.
I
E
F
You
can
see
that
this
area-
well,
I
guess
district
three
is
technically
expanded,
slightly
right
into
duradon
a
little
bit
and
then
into
past
dulmas
park
on
this
end
and
is
shrunk.
A
And
I
know
you
did
this
last
time,
and
I
know
commissioner
berrigan
has
asked
this
probably
like
several
times,
but
you
know
what
happens
if
you
put
goodyear
mastic
back
in
d3
like
how?
How
much
is
that?
Does
it
change
there?
Well,.
F
E
F
F
F
Make
this
change,
but
it
also
then,
would
require
you
know
a
shift.
I
mean
the
easiest
shift
would
be
having
district
7
go
north
into
district
3
and
pick
up
different
neighborhoods
swap,
but
you
can
also
do
a
rotation
where
district
three
comes
in
this
way,
district
seven
pulls
from
the
east
and
you
do
a
rotation
around.
G
Chris,
could
we
expand,
I'm
sorry
explore
trying
to
reclaim
spartan
keys
virginia
and
martha
back
into
district
three.
G
Now,
what
if
we
went
to
the
northern
boundary
where
it
goes
into
district
four
to
try
and
trim
some
of
those
boundaries
to
bring
the
district
three
boundary
further?
You
know
to
trim
it
south.
F
That
wouldn't
work,
because
district
4
is
overpopulated
by
six
percent.
Okay,
I
mean
you,
you
would
you
would
just
make
the
upper
bounds
higher.
I
mean
right
like
if
you
did
this.
Let's
say
you
took
two
points
out
of
three
and
moved
it
into
four.
Then
you'd
have
two
eights
two
over
eight
percent
populated
districts.
So
then
you
just
have
to
basically
make
sure
your
floor
was
above
was
above
negative.
Two
percent,
so
you'd
have
to
grow
six
and
two
into
the
1.9
region.
F
G
So
los
plumas
has
a
natural
boundary
of
king
north
king
road.
We
could
try
to
unify
that
up
to
king
road,
I'm
trying
to
see
zoom
in
and
I
can't
really.
F
Want
me
to
make
this
swap,
I
can
easily
reverse
it
well
here
when
we
make
this
swap
and
then
let's
go
look.
F
F
F
G
G
G
G
F
F
We
need
to
take
less
less
populated
by
more
than
six
percent,
so
we
need
to
get
to
six
point
here.
Sorry,
let
me
do
this
again.
G
So
if
we,
if
we
take
that
those
are
also
some
resident
like
residential,
but
it's
also
newer
apartments
in
the
square-
that's
just
north
of
the
red
all
the
way
up
to
mawberry
and
east
of
king
road.
That
area
there.
K
F
F
L
F
F
So
this
would
make
it
you'd
be
at
two
point:
eight
four,
eight
three
under
for
seven
and
six
would
be.
F
Six
would
then
I
mean
you're
so
doing
this.
You
now
success
to
grow
right
because
you
just
put
in
seven
so
six
is
now
underpopulated
by
seven
percent,
and
really
the
only
place
it
can
grow
is
into
district
three.
F
F
District
five,
so
I
guess
we're
looking
at
the
major
changes
we're
in
district
five
we've
got
a
38
api,
cvap,
2.4
african-american
and
a
45.75
latino
c-vap.
F
This
is
still
much
lower
than
the
unity
number
of
48.2
and
I
think
one
of
the
one
of
the
reasons
is
that
district
5
in
the
unity
unity
map
is
under
populated
by
3.6
percent.
F
I
I
mean
the
problem.
The
problem
is,
is
that
remember,
we
can't
grow
into
one.
We
can't
grow
into
nine
because
of
population
issues
right
now
we
can't
grow
into
seven,
so
you
can
only
grow
into
three
and
three.
We
expanded
actually
into
the
deer
dawn
area
for
what
I
think
are
legitimate
purposes,
given
the
contemplated
development
in
that
area
and
what
I
understand,
the
general
plan
to
be
for
that
area
and
its
connection
to
downtown
so.
I
There's
a
lot
of
movement
here,
but
the
original
thought
I
had
thinking
about
the
comments
that
the
chair
made
originally
was:
okay.
How
do
we
not
split
them
up
into
three,
and
originally
we
had
goodyear
mastic
and
six,
which
is
also
what
the
unity
map
and
the
community
map
pad,
I
believe
or
the
union.
I
So
we
could
certainly
absorb
the
density
in
guadalupe
washington
and
not
alter
the
metrics
in
a
negative
way
in
terms
of
deviation
so
but
outside
of
that,
the
only
way
to
balance
this
would
be
to
take
part
of
three
and
put
it
into
six.
And
we
have
to
be
very
sensitive
with
that,
because
we've
had
a
lot
of
testimony
about
folks
who
live
in
the
downtown
area
that
have
no
relationship
to
district
six
and
there
is
a
natural
boundary
there
with
the
railroad
tracks.
A
I
Yeah,
well,
let
me
I'll
repeat
myself
so
that
move
it's
a
modest
amount
of
population,
obviously
because
that
is
all
commercial,
so
it
was
like
750
people,
and
there
was
testimony
that
we
received
both
in
writing
and
orally,
that
there
is
a
synergy
between
downtown
west,
which
is
the
deardon
station
area
and
downtown.
Obviously
I
mean
there's
a
demarcation
with
87,
but
the
idea
and
the
general
plan.
My
understanding
is
that
there's
a
there's,
a
pedestrian
flow,
that's
going
to
be
desired
from
beardown
into
downtown
right.
I
It's
a
feeder
area
into
downtown
through
the
google
village
through
the
other
developments
that
are
going
on
even
north
of
near
coleman,
and
so
there's
a
certain
not
to
mention
the
fact
that
there
is
bart
coming
through
allegedly
and
that
it
would
may
be
easier
and
people
will
share
interest
in
those
events,
if
that
section,
where
bart
is
ultimately
going
to
end
up,
for
example,
shares
the
same
council
member
is
downtown
where
the
train
supposed
to
come
all
the
way
through
down
santa
clara
street,
not
to
mention
the
fact
that
there's
business
districts
there
I
mean
so
that's.
I
That
is
really
what
was
the
impetus
for
moving
that
line
basically
into
deerdon
station,
and
so
that
was
something
I
suggested,
and
I
asked
for
feedback
from
commissioner
berrigan
and
she
agreed,
and
so
we
made
that
change.
G
L
Have
a
sense
and
darlene
is
extremely
latino
and
I
have
a
feeling
of
higher
into
las.
Plumas
is
probably
not,
but
I
don't
know
the
numbers.
That's
why
I'm
asking
yeah
give
me
some
information.
F
So
it's
moved
it
down
a
point
district
three,
which
we
also
made
changes
to
his
current
latino
c-vap
is
34.2.
L
If
you
would,
would
you
also
tell
me
how
it
looks
for
african-american
and
for
asian.
F
Sure
the
district
5
currently
at
2.24
african
american,
it
was
at
2.6
when
we
started
then
districts
three
is
at
four
point:
seven:
nine
percent
african-american
now
and
when
we
started
it
was
at
5.1
percent
and
then
for
the
for
the
api
district
3.
It's
currently
at
24,
it
started
at
let's
see:
asian
27
percent
and
district
5
is
currently
at
38
percent
and
the
asians
evap,
where
we
started,
was
at
36.9.
A
Commissioner,
sid
barry,
I
I
know
you
had
your
hand
up
earlier.
Did
you
have
a
comment
or
question.
C
Well,
no,
I
wanted
to
go
back
to
commissioner
martinez.
That's
how
I
wanted
to
know
the
breakdown
of
the
ethnicity
of
those
districts
that
were
moving
around.
I
thought.
Last
week
we
did
have
the
golden
mystic
in
the
district
seven,
but
now
here
we
we're
looking
at.
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
chris,
I
think
you
said
we
were
at
for
district
seven.
C
Where
are
we?
Was
it
seven
percent
a
little
over
seven
percent?
I'm
sorry
it's
2.83!
Now,
but
from
last
week
we're
1.47
isn't
that
right
so.
F
Goodyear
masik
is
now
in
seven.
The
spartan
keys
area
is
now
in
three
and
we
moved
las
pumas
into
three
as
well,
so
you've
changed
one,
I'm
sorry
and
then
just
in
district
five,
the
last
one
was
always
there,
but
we've
moved
part
of
los
plumas
over
into
district
five
along
king
street.
F
Those
are
the
major
shifts
so
far
and
I
think
what
this
change
seems
to
try
to
be
trying
to
do
is
kind
of
make
three
what
it
was
before
a
little
bit
before
and
unify
some
some
neighborhoods.
But
by
doing
it
it's
a
it's
very.
It's
overpopulated
four,
five,
three
four
and
five
to
a
great
extent
and
also
district
five
has
actually
had
a
reduction
in
latino
siva,
with
the
inclusion
of
heart
of
las
vegas.
C
F
It's
really
tough.
Well,
I
think
one
thing
that
commissioner,
that
lives
in
brought
up
is
that
you
could.
F
F
Undo
what
we've
done
yeah-
I
don't
want
us
to
do
that,
but,
like
that's
for
sure
I
mean
the
the
fundamental
issue
with
this
map
is,
it
is,
is
three
four
and
five
are
weight
are
overpopulated
and
everything
else
is
under
so
yeah
4-5
is
going
to
have
to
give
up
territory
to
the
other
districts.
F
F
G
We
have
some
conflicting
feedback
from
the
community
in
regards
to
the
spartan
keys
neighborhood,
with
the
preferences
of
being
in
district
3
or
district
seven.
So
until
we
hear
some
further
public
feedback,
it
might
be
best
to
keep
it
in
district
7.
F
Okay,
so
this
would
move
seven
to
three
percent
over
and
three
to
two
percent.
F
Okay
populations,
but
still
need
to
come
back
to
district.
G
L
I
was
going
to
say
so
now
that
that
guadalupe
is
back
out
of
the
change.
What
how
does
that
leave
the
demographics
at
the
changes
that
were
made
back
up
at
talking
about
darlene
and
las
plumas?.
F
Sure
the
district
five
has
a
deviation
of
six
point:
six:
nine
38.22
percent
agency,
vap
2.24
african-american
c-vap
and
45.75
latino
siva.
G
L
No,
I
was
going
to
come
in,
so
these
changes
reduce
the
latino
percentages
in
district
five,
at
least
two
to
three
percent,
which
is,
I
would
think,
that's
going
to
be
an
issue
with
people.
You'll
probably
hear
it,
because
d5
is
the
only
district
in
the
city
that
has
a
strong
latino
count
the
api.
It's
you
know
it's
about
forty,
seven,
nine
or
something
like
that.
So
you
bring
that
two
or
three
percent.
L
That's
a
bit!
That's
a
big
change.
I
would
think
it
also
ap.
The
api
population
is
very
strong
in
berryessa
and
and
district
8
in
these
other
discussions,
and
I'm
not
sure
and
again
they
have,
you
know
that's.
I
would
think
that's
their
strong
areas
of
interest
to
not
reduce
their
numbers
again,
I'm
just
commenting
for
anticipating
discussions
that
would
are
going
to
arise
from
the
thought.
L
My
my
basic
thought,
though,
is
that
talking
about
the
and
darlene
change
only
that
might
actually
that,
as
I
recall,
the
area
is
very
latino
there.
In
darlene,
I've
been
around
the
end
darling
school
in
the
past
and
that
might
not
make
too
much
difference
just
that
area
going
in,
but
I
have
that
other
that
other
section
you
talked
about
up
high.
L
L
No,
no,
the
and
darlene
area.
You
know,
commissioner
barragan
talked
about
the
and
arlene
areas
going
into
five
right
in
the
proposal.
L
But
again
I
I
understand,
but
the
it's
just
simple
there
and
arlene
is
extremely
like
it's
a
heavy
latino
area.
It
quite
relates
to
d5.
I
mean
it
could.
So
that's
all
I'm
saying
because
this
is
just
gonna
arise.
I
I'm
just
anticipating
discussion
later
and
las
plumas
and
all
that
is
not
very
latino.
I
don't
think
that
three
or
four
percent,
two
or
three
percent
difference
is
going
to
be
an
issue.
D
Yes,
I
do
want
to
echo
commissioner
martinez's
concern
because,
as
we
play
around
with
these
lines,
I
do
notice
that
the
latino
c-vap
percentage
keeps
going
down
for
in
district
3
and
district
5
and
based
on
my
notes,
the
the
current
latino
see
that
percentage
as
the
lines
are
drawn
today.
District
three
is
at
36.5
and
district
5
is
at
48.
D
D
A
We
have
four
folks
who
want
to
present
maps
and
oh,
there
are
three
now,
not
not
four,
but
what
I
was
gonna
ask-
and
I
was
gonna
suggest-
is
that
if
there
are
folks
who
have
presented
maps
previously
that
they
only
present
on
what
has
changed
from
their
previous
presentation,
so
I
I
don't
know
if
the
commission
feels
comfortable
with
that
direction,
but
but
yeah
that's
what
I
would
ask
for
those
folks
who
would
like
to
present
a
map
that
you
only
present
on
on
changes,
and
in
addition
to
that,
I
I
think
at
this
point
we
would
need
to
limit
those
presentations
to
five
minutes.
A
I
know
it's
been
sort
of
fast
and
loose
in
the
past,
but
I
I
just
think
at
this
point
in
time.
It's
I
think
five
minutes
should
be
sufficient.
I
I
will
I
will
move
to
limit
the
presentations
to
what
has
changed
and
for
each
presentation
not
to
exceed
five
minutes.
G
A
B
Okay,
so
I
have
three
new
presenters
and
then
cheryl
wanted
to
talk
about
their
update
and
jeffrey
buchanan
is
also
here,
for
I'm
not
sure
if
he
has
updates
to
the
unity
map
or
just
wanted
to
talk
about
it.
So
would
you
like
me
to
start
with
the
three
brand
new
presentations.
A
B
Okay,
so
I'm
gonna-
let
megan's
not
here
so
I'm
by
myself.
B
K
D
B
I
can
go
to
jeremy
plunkett,
thank
you
or
trudy
ellerbeck.
Whoever
is
ready
to
go
first.
I
think
trudy's
already
in.
D
D
So
many
of
our
neighbors
inside
and
outside
our
boundaries
have
availed
themselves
of
the
community
that
we
offer
national
night
outs
that
have
hosted
over
300
guests.
Four
installed
little
free
libraries
with
three
more
ready
to
go.
In
the
coming
weeks:
five
painted
utility
boxes
to
beautify
white
road
with
two
more
and
q,
plus
a
sizeable
mural
on
martin
avenue,
we've
hosted
many
paint
classes,
jewelry,
making
classes,
arts
and
crafts
classes,
we've
hosted
emergency
preparedness,
presentations
and
neighborhood
watch
meetings.
D
We
have
a
large
cert
team
in
our
own
neighborhood
and
we
are
soon
to
have
mount
pleasant
based
regional
meetings.
We've
hosted
tree
plantings
to
create
canopy
and
reduce
the
heat
island
of
east
san
jose.
It's
imperative
that
we
remain
intact
to
continue
our
legacy
of
strong
leadership
and
community
development.
D
I
want
to
share
with
you
the
boundaries
of
our
neighborhood
on
the
north
is
mount
vista
drive
on
the
west
is
south
white
road
on
the
excuse
me
on
the
west
and
south
right.
Road
on
the
south
is
martin
avenue,
which
goes
up
to
clayton
road,
and
we
have
an
arm.
That's
up
squarey
drive
here
we
became
alarmed
when
we
saw
a
couple
of
maps.
This
is
the
d4
map,
as
it
appears
most
recently.
D
D
B
O
I'd
like
to
share
my
screen.
Sorry
share
screen
there
we
go.
O
Do
you
see
the
powerpoint
here
thanks?
Yes,
so
the
concern
I
I'm
calling
in
to
raise
this
evening
is
something
that
I
think
is
important
to
the
process
and
for
everyone
to
be
aware
of,
and
I
just
it's
something
I
haven't
heard
anyone
discuss
in
the
entire
time
here.
O
This
is
a
key
bit
if
anyone
wants
to
take
a
screenshot
I've
provided
what
I
would
ask
you
all
to
search
on
when
you
get
a
chance
to
google
staggered
redistricting
disenfranchises,
and
you
will
find
this
paper
by
margaret
b,
weston,
circa
2012
or
so
one
person
no
vote.
Staggered
elections,
redistricting
and
disenfranchisement.
O
O
O
If
the
process
of
redistricting
moves
the
boundary
out
from
under
you
such
that
you
now
reside
in
d6,
for
example,
you
will
not
be
voting
in
2022
for
a
council
member
you'll
have
to
wait
until
the
sitting
incumbent,
d6,
council,
member,
that
you
had
no
say
in
electing,
is
done
and
out
of
office
in
2024.
That's
when
you
get
to
vote
it's
a
six
year
period.
O
O
O
I
was
talking
to
someone
about
this
the
other
day
and
they
said
well.
If
voters
don't
feel
disenfranchised,
then
yeah
pretty
much
they're,
not
disenfranchised,
nobody's
gonna.
Do
anything
about
this.
This
is
a
subtle
legal
distinction.
It's
a
nitpicking
right!
If,
if
you
are
an
affected
voter,
you
should
feel
disenfranchised.
You
have
been
disenfranchised,
it
doesn't
matter,
and
this
might
sound
a
little
dramatic,
but
it's
in
red,
because
it's
true
and
it's
important,
you
should
pay
attention.
O
It
doesn't
matter
if
thugs
with
guns
turn
you
away
from
the
polling,
place
or
corrupt
vote
counting
causes
your
ballot
to
be
tossed
out
or
arbitrary
changes
to
id
requirements
make
you
have
to
jump
through
hoops
to
vote.
You
know
you
need
a
birth
certificate
or
something.
For
example,
all
these
are
forms
of
disenfranchisement
and
a
two-year
delay
in
your
ability
to
vote
and
a
two-year
period
when
you
don't
have
any
representation
at
your
closest
most
local
level
of
government
is
also
disenfranchising.
O
O
Is
this
how
our
democracy
is
supposed
to
work
wikipedia
says
several
constitutional
amendments:
15th
19th
26th
require
voting
rights
of
u.s.
Citizens
cannot
be
abridged
on
account
of
race.
Color
previous
condition
of
servitude,
sex
or
age
turns
out.
They
left
one
out
address
of
residence
seems
to
be
a
loophole.
O
Actually,
this
is
a
known
issue
in
the
legal
constitutional
law
community
and
it
comes
down
to
a
bad
call
by
the
california
supreme
court
in
1973,
and
that's
not
just
my
opinion.
Actual
lawyers
say
that
too
margaret
b
wesson,
for
example,
we
know
that
supreme
courts
are
not
infallible.
O
The
court
in
1973
said
fixing.
This
issue
would
substantially
interfere
with
the
orderly
operation
of
the
four-year
staggered
term
system
after
every
reapportionment.
So
basically
they
said
we
know
it's
not
great,
but
it's
it's
too
inconvenient
to
deal
with
it.
The
convenience
of
administering
elections
overrides
the
harm
of
voters.
Getting
disenfranchised.
A
Mr
plunkett
we're
giving
folks
a
new
presentations.
Five
minutes
and
we've
gone
over
five
minutes
just
wanted
to
know
if
you
could
wrap
it
up.
O
Yeah,
okay,
I've
emailed
this
to
all
the
commissioners,
so
you
can.
You
can
look
at
the
slides
here,
I'm
just
asking
to
contact
your
council
member
they're,
the
ones
who
actually
make
the
vote
on
this.
Let
them
know
that
this
is
a
real
issue,
that's
important
to
you
and
your
neighbors,
and
it's
not
too
late
to
fix
this.
I
put
together
a
map
in
20
minutes
the
one
I
submitted
this
morning
that
actually
minimizes
the
number
of
voters
who
are
affected
by
this
issue.
O
It's
not
a
perfect
map.
I
did
it
real
quick,
I'm
not
the
experts
and,
I
believe
the
experts,
the
neighborhood
volunteers
and
the
other
people
that
have
submitted
maps
can
take
this
into
account
and
they
can
fix
this,
and
I
would
ask
you,
commissioners,
to
ask
your
consultant
to
use
his
software
to
give
you
this
data.
He
he
has
the
software
that
can
show
exactly
which
voters
are
affected
for
each
map,
how
many
voters
are
being
disenfranchised
and
it's
something
that
the
council
should
know
when
they
eventually
vote
on
this.
N
D
N
N
This
map
shows
the
outline
of
the
venn
dome.
It's
a
very
small
neighborhood,
approximately
only
nine
blocks,
long
from
taylor
street
to
ryland
bassett
street,
and
only
two
blocks
wide
from
87
freeway
to
north
first.
It
is
mainly
the
former
property
of
the
vendome
hotel
and
includes
apartment
complexes,
two
condominium
complexes
and
many
historic
homes
and
duplexes.
N
You
can
see
the
vendome
in
this
area.
We
selected
this
map
because
it
shows
the
topography
on
the
west
side
is
the
87
freeway,
the
guadalupe
river,
the
guadalupe
park,
a
shopping
plaza
and
a
railroad
and
the
airports
over
there.
These
natural
and
artificial
boundaries
separate
us
from
the
rose
garden,
willow,
glendon
district.
Six
on
the
north
side
are
the
old
county
buildings,
including
the
county,
jail,
a
tiny
home
village
and
another
upcoming
project
for
the
unhoused
in
the
police.
N
Parking
lot
on
the
east
side
is
the
north
first
street
urban
transit
village,
which
is
in
the
final
planning
stages,
the
japan,
town,
air,
light
rail,
stop
the
second
stop
from
santa
clara
street
and
our
adjacent
neighborhoods
of
hensley
and
japan.
Town
a
picture
is
worth
a
thousand
words.
This
illustrates
the
unique
placement
of
our
neighborhood,
including
the
natural
boundaries
separation
from
d6
and
our
close
proximity
to
the
downtown
next
slide.
Please.
N
N
It
clearly
shows
the
vendome
carved
out
from
the
downtown
into
another
district.
At
the
last
meeting,
it
was
orally
stated
that
it
is
planned
to
shift
the
line
to
san
pedro,
which
is
almost
worse,
as
this
would
actually
divide
our
small
neighborhood
and
isolate,
isolate
a
small
number
of
homes
and
residents
against
the
freeway.
N
N
N
This
shows
the
community
map.
The
community
map
keeps
the
vendome
whole
and
connected
with
our
adjacent
downtown
neighbors.
While
it
is
somewhat
similar
to
the
redistricting
partners
map,
the
community
map
was
created
from
a
grassroots
neighborhood
effort
and
has
tried
to
reach
out
to
the
various
neighborhood
associations
and
residents
for
input
and
complies
with
the
redistricting
guidelines.
N
These
are
some
bullet
points.
We
engage
regularly
with
representatives
from
northside
hyde
park,
japantown,
hensley
and
other
downtown
neighborhoods
on
various
city,
government
and
neighborhood
concerns
objectives
and
proof
and
improvements,
downtown
development,
the
airport
in
its
development,
the
guadalupe
river
park
in
general,
with
the
associated
unhoused
situation
and
the
urban
transit
village,
all
greatly
impact
ours
and
the
surrounding
neighborhoods.
N
B
A
I
think
we
could
allow
them
unless
they're
there.
If
there
are
changes
to
their
maps
from
last
week,
then
they
could
speak
to
that
as
well.
But
at
this
point
I
would,
I
would
think
you
know
we
could
just
ask
questions
too.
B
Okay,
let
me
unmute
cheryl.
First.
H
H
H
A
H
So
this
cumulative
map-
I
guess
we'll-
call
it
4.0.
So
what
I
have
to
say
is
here's
the
community
map
4.0
that
we're
presenting
it
looks
it.
Basically,
the
highest
number
for
population
is
105
000.
The
highest
deviation
is
3.91.
The
overall
deviation
is
6.97.
H
Then
I
will
get
to.
Let
me
see
here's
an
overlay
from
the
current
d4
map
to
ours.
So
there's
a
few
changes
over
here
and
over
here:
okay,
the
q
it
reduces
compared
to
the
d4
map
it
reduces
overall
deviation
by
1.4
reduces
highest
population
from
107
to
105
keeps
five
completely
intact,
while
adding
from
four
keeps
reed
hill
view
where
it's
supposed
to
be.
It
also
follows
the
guidance
from
the
district
three
commissioner
to
expand
the
alma
area
and
it
keeps
dav
hill
and
ocala
in
their
current
districts.
H
I'll
go
through
the
three
changes
here.
Just
took
three
four
five
boundaries:
a
little
portugal
over
here
we
spoke
to
david
vieira
who's,
a
community
leader
in
the
area,
and
he
said
that
the
portuguese
community
in
this
area
has
diminished
quite
a
bit
and
it
is
okay
to
leave
that
in
d5,
where
it
currently
is,
then
I
I
thought
we
could
pull
up
plumas
here,
a
little
bit
of
that
into
d5
and
d3
into
various
crossing,
because
that
balances
out
the
population
in
that
area.
H
Those
are
those
three
changes.
Then
district
578
boundaries.
I
recommend
putting
dove
hill
back
into
district
leave
it
in
district
7..
Last
week
they
moved
dove
hill
into
district
8,
but
dove
hill
was
is
already
currently
in
district
7.
So
I
recommend
not
changing
it
radial
view.
I
recommend
leaving
it
in
five
o'calla,
which
had
been
expanded
into
d8,
but
was
I
mean
with
six
was
moved
into
d5,
but
it
was
supposed
to
be
in
d8.
H
To
begin
with,
I
recommend
leaving
opala
in
d8,
where
it
currently
is
in
the
city
map
and
leaving
wn7,
where
it
currently
is
in
the
same
map
that
balances
the
population
out
over
there
and
then
the
other
change
is
the
367
boundary.
Okay.
So
last
time
d
mentioned
that
we
should
explore
expanding
alma
down
to
san
jose
avenue.
So
I
did
move
it
down
to
san
jose
avenue
and
a
little
bit
beyond.
I've
filled
in
the
whole
area.
There,
okay,
because
d
had
recommended
that
we
explore
that.
So
I
put
that
area
into
six.
H
So
these
two
areas
are
together
here
and
six
and
then
around
the
diridon
there's
just
a
slight
change.
It
just
wasn't
completely
accurate.
I
was
drawn
okay,
so
that's
what
I'm
looking
at.
I
know
that's
the
sensitive
area
so,
like
I
said
dee
I
mentioned
that
and
then
we
also
got
an
email
from
a
long
time
resident
in
the
virginia
spartan
keys
and
she
said
she
likes
being
in
district
seven.
She
feels
like
she's,
better
served
down
there.
H
I
think
dee
knows
her
she's
a
very
long
time
resident
and
she
likes
being
in
d7.
Actually,
she
doesn't
feel
represented
here,
so
the
other
alternative
for
this
area
right
here
is
like
you
guys
I
just
mentioned
instead
keep
because
alma
is
currently
in
d7
down
here.
So
you
could
keep
those
two
guadalupe
washington
and
six
and
put
virginia
martha,
keep
that
in
three,
so
that
would
leave
virginia
martha
in
three.
H
They
would
leave
this
in
seven
and
these
two
would
go
and
then
the
numbers
are
still
basically
about
the
same,
and
this
is
the
commissioner's
d4
map
versus
community
map.
You
can
see
the
numbers
over
here
for
the
cbap
are
basically
the
same.
They
pretty
much,
don't
change.
Okay,
so
I
think
did
I
use
up
my
five
minutes?
H
No,
oh
so
best
anyway.
So
that's
the
main
changes,
because
I
want
to
keep
it
simple
and
I
know
we're
trying
to
get
through
this
meeting
today.
I
don't
know
if
anybody
has
any
questions.
I
will
just
leave
it
at
that
at
this
point,
and
it
does
still,
you
know,
keep
the
well
anyway.
I
won't
get
it.
You
know,
there's
things,
there's
all
kinds
of
concerns
for
people,
but
if
anybody
has
any
questions
or
anything,
they
would
like
me
to
review
or
anything
I'd
be
glad
to
do
that.
H
But
again
this
this
area
I
know
right
here
is
a
is
a
area
of
concern.
Obviously,
everything
that
I
had
five
seven
eight
is
just
put
that
back
where
it
belongs.
Put
that
back
where
it
belongs
and
put
that
back
where
it
belongs,
meaning
where
it
currently
is.
H
Okay,
that's
the
five
seven
eight
boundaries
is
just
put
those
pieces
back
to
where
they
currently
are,
instead
of
where
they're
moved
on
the
d4
and
then
up
here
put
little
portugal
back
to
where
it
currently
is
in
d5,
okay
and
then
just
the
berryessa
expand
five
over
here
and
three
up
there,
because
just
to
take
it
reduces
district
four
from
100
and
almost
108
000
down
to
it,
reduces
it
by
2200
people.
So
it
brings.
H
You
know,
2200
people
down
now
that
the
was
like,
I
said,
that's
107,
000.,
and
so
those
are
those
and
then,
like.
I
said
this
area
down
here.
I
know
this
is
the
high
area
of
concern
that
you
know.
Maybe
it
could
go
that
way.
Maybe
it
could
go
that
way.
I'm
just
suggestions
based
on
what
we
had
talked
about.
That's
all.
G
D
P
Right
all
right
yeah,
this
is
jeffrey.
I
just
wanted
to
run
real
quickly
through
the
the
changes
in
in
our
map.
We
got
a
couple
slides
with
the
the
card
outs
of
the
changes,
and
I
think
andreas
quintero
was
was
also
on
to
promote
him,
and
then
we
can
be
real
brief.
I'm
here,
oh
excellent,
all
right!
Let
me
just
load
up
sorry
always
forget
how
to
do
the
okay.
P
Okay,
all
right,
sorry,
just
loading
up
the
screen
share.
Let
me
just
zoom
down
to
the
okay,
the
actual
changes
andres.
Do
you
want
to
start
with
the
first
change
in
terms
of
the
mountain
pleasant.
Q
Yeah
so
as
part
of
the
process
of
taking
input
listening
to
the
community,
as
I
was
mentioned
by
trudy
ellerbach,
we
had
a
conversation
and
they
expressed
their
concerns
with
the
division
of
mount
pleasant
at
the
northern
part.
So
if
you
notice
the
the
the
area
in
green
right,
there
is
now
whole
and
mount
pleasant.
Neighborhood
association
is
no
longer
divided
under
the
unity
map.
Q
Yesterday
that
we
heard
a
lot
of
clear
that
there
was
not
yesterday
last
week
that
there
was
a
desire
to
make
some
shifts
in
district
seven
in
response
to
some
of
the
community
input,
and
so
in
order
to
make
up
for
the
population
that
was
gained
in
d5
dove
hill
from
district
7
was
inserted
into
district
8,
which
happens
to
be
an
area
that
has
gone
back
and
forth.
Contrary
to
testimony.
That's
been
stated
in
the
past.
Dove
hill
in
the
past
has
been
part
of
district
8..
Q
Some
folks
aren't
aware
of
that,
but
those
of
us
who've
actually
worked
in
those
communities,
have
we're
aware
of
the
fact
that
that
area
has
shifted
back
and
forth
from
seven
to
eight
every
once
in
a
while.
Yeah.
P
So
in
terms
of
in
in
between
six
and
one
the
quarry
neighborhood
for
some
reason,
the
city's
mapping
of
the
quarry
neighborhood
doesn't
reflect
the
quarry
neighborhood
association's
consideration
of
their
boundaries,
and
so
for
that
reason
we
kind
of
had
split
it
unnecessarily
and
so
put
corey
neighborhood
into
six
and
again.
This
is
the
map
that
we
submitted,
but
I
don't
believe
registering
partners
had
enough
time
to
put
into
your
packet
so
hopefully
for
the
next
meeting.
It
can
be
reflected.
P
So
apologies
for
that
to
the
commissioners
other
than
that
change.
There's
been
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
discussion
around,
certainly
the
the
the
block
of
neighborhoods
around
spartan
keys,
squash
and
guadalupe
tamian
and
good
gymnastic.
P
We
you
know
in
in
talking
with
those
communities
over
the
last
week
and
in
particular,
we've
heard
a
lot
of
interest
in
those
communities
staying
together.
You
know,
particularly
since
those
are
some
of
the
most
densely
latino
neighborhoods
within
district
three
and
there's
a
lot
of
concern
about
them.
Staying
together
as
a
block,
I
think
you've
seen
the
commissioners
how
difficult
it
is
to
try
to
move
population
south.
P
I
think
you're,
probably
starting
to
see
a
little
bit
about
why
our
map
moves
population
in
three
from
four
to
three
and
then
west
rather
than
south,
because
of
this
issue
with
the
potential
cracking.
If
you
do
move
south
rather
than
west.
You
know.
We've
also
heard
concerns
from
the
public
about
you
know.
Why
are
we
swooping
in
and
grabbing
the
dalmas
park
and
gardener
neighborhoods?
So
we
took
tamian
out
of
six
and
put
it
into
three
and
then
put
delmas
and
gardner
into
six
for
more
coherence.
P
In
the
end,
it
also
creates
a
unity
in
terms
of
the
lgbt
community
of
interest.
We've
heard
testimony
on
the
deerding
community
of
interest
and
we're
actually
like
three
census
blocks,
short
of
containing
the
entirety
of
the
p
bid,
the
property
based
improvement,
district
for
the
downtown
association,
and
so
if
commissioners
were
were
interested
in
that
you
know.
Certainly
we
could
add
those
three
census
blocks
to
make
the
p
bid
entirely
within
district
six.
P
We
heard
from
the
vp
community,
so
we
we
made
them
hole
in
district,
nine,
the
four
I'm
sorry
in
district,
two,
the
four
corners
neighborhoods
making
them
whole
in
district
nine
and
then,
with
some
of
the
population
swaps
we
found
we
could
go
back
to
more
of
the
original
boundary
in
district.
Five
and
again,
as
commissioners
are
saying,
it's
really
the
more
that
you
move
five
up
into
four.
P
It
does
a
lot
to
change
the
c-bap
for
the
latino
population,
and
so
with
that
in
mind,
we
made
made
that
swap
because
it
was
possible
with
our
new
map.
It
brings
our
our
deviation
down
by
about
0.4
percent,
so
I
think
it's
sitting
at
about
8.4
no
real
major
shifts
in
terms
of
the
demographics,
but
certainly
willing
to
answer
any
questions
again.
P
Oh
in
regards
to
the
pbid
and
the
downtown
association
and
some
of
the
businesses,
this
would
be
the
area
that
we
would
add
to
encompass
the
entirety
of
the
property
based
improvement
district
that
some
business
owners
have
spoke
to.
You
know
it's
a
we
could
make
it.
It
would
increase
the
deviation.
But
if
the
commission
thought
that
was
important,
we
could
certainly
do
that.
Thank
you
so
much
glad
to
take
questions.
B
Those
public
people
that
submitted
their
names
to
me
ahead
of
the
meeting.
A
Okay,
so
at
this
time,
then,
why
don't
we
just
go
to
the
members
of
the
public?
That
would
we
wish
to
speak.
E
I'm
a
meredith
as
a
state.
I've
never
done
the
updated
map
is
the
only
map
under
consideration
by
the
commission
that
does
not
radically
dilute
the
votes
of
latino
residents
in
downtown
district,
3,
6
and
east
san
jose
5..
I
agree
with
commissioners
martinez
and
cardenas
that
that's
a
very
strong
concern
maps
d4
in
the
community
threw
the
five
most
latinx
neighborhoods
out
of
d3
downtown,
which
is
a
form
of
dilution
of
the
latino
votes.
E
It
ensures
a
powerful
neighborhood
equal
vote
by
placing
washington
guadalupe
in
the
eastern
downtown
district
between
tamius
three
other
predominantly
the
index
neighborhoods
of
d3
today,
therefore,
maintaining
community
interest,
as
far
as
the
black
community
the
unity
map,
particularly
in
what
was
formerly
d2
and
formerly
despicable,
it
increases
the
black
vote
by
one-third
of
both
cases.
Both
few
black
americans
in
our
city
do
the
long
legacy
of
racism
redlining
in
san
jose
displacement.
We
should
only
support
plans
to
grow.
E
The
black
community
share
of
the
vote
map
does
precisely
that,
and
so
it
is
mike
concerned
that
we
don't
do
not
dilute
the
latinx
vote
in
the
downtown
area
and
in
the
predominantly
latinx
areas
that
are
south
of
280..
J
Hi
there
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
perfect.
I
just
wanted
to
comment
briefly
on
a
couple
previously
presented
maps
that
I
presented,
maybe
a
few
meetings
ago
and
have
written
in
in
the
past
several
meetings
as
well.
I
just
wanted
to
remind
you
that
since
we've
been
talking
a
lot
about
the
api
and
hispanic
latinx
cbaf
districts,
that
my
map
is
one
of
the
few
that
does
protect
a
lot
of
those
districts.
It
also
increases
the
hispanic
and
latinx
plurality
see
about
number
of
districts
by
one.
J
So
now
there's
two
plurality
to
see
that
hispanic
latinx
districts.
So
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out.
If
you
wanted
to
go
back
and
take
a
look
at
that
as
an
addition,
an
additional
consideration
but
barring
that,
if
you
do
want
to
kind
of
just
say,
pass
on
it
due
to
some
potential
bold
changes,
I
urge
you
to
support
the
unity
map.
Thank
you
so
much.
B
Okay,
vicky
put
her
hand
down,
so
I
have
benvo
followed
by
victor
vasquez.
J
Yeah
good
evening,
members
of
the
commission,
members
of
the
public,
my
name
is
benvo
and
I'm
here
today
I've
been
listening
to
all
the
presentations
and
for
the
past
few
weeks
I
think,
in
my
opinion,
that
it's
worth
taking
a
look,
overlaying
maps
on
top
of,
and
I've
already
presented,
maps
of
renters
of
immigrants
of
average
household
income,
and
especially
our
neighbors,
who
are
at
the
most
risk
of
being
displaced
by
rising
rents
and
how
that
factors
into
just
what
has
been
already
discussed
in
the
discourse
today,
and
I
think
majority
of
minority
districts
have
a
lot
to
not
just
repair
rebel
against
and
fix,
but
that
decisions
local
government
are
being
made
about
them
without
them,
which
is
unfair,
and
we
know
that
registration
affects
political
power
and
that
representation
means
that
we're
at
the
table,
but
sometimes
our
skin
folk
aren't
always
our
kinfold
and
we
need
more
than
a
fair
shot
of
electing
candidates
that
can
represent
our
worldview
fight
for
our
concerns
and
action
to
represent
the
interest
of
those
who
have
been
most
disenfranchised
by
registering
in
the
past.
E
That's
thriving
last
year
about
two
years
ago,
at
the
beginning
of
the
cover
pandemic,
when
knocked
on
doors
engaged
over
50
000
families
on
the
census
and
voter
education
campaigns
in
a
campaign
called
power,
not
fear,
and
the
purpose
is
to
make
sure
that
our
community
was
correctly
counted
and
that
they
felt
empowered
to
actually
engage
in
the
democratic
process
locally
and
beyond.
Our
slogan
recognized
that
injustice
that
we
faced
has
been
because
of
the
years
of
racism,
gerrymandering
exclusion,
language
test,
water,
disenfranchisement,
deuteronomy,
skin.
E
The
fact
that
we
live
in
poverty
and
the
cultural
makeup
of
our
communities,
and
so
for
us.
It's
important
to
to
remind
people
that
you
know
we're
still
dealing
with
a
lot
of
issues
that
only
through
having
a
strong
representation
for
latino
and
bipolar
communities
in
district
five.
And
we
want
to
see
that
representation
grow
in
terms
of
borders.
In
terms
of
like
the
issues
that
we
see
in
the
solutions-
and
we
believe
that
that
comes
through
unity
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we
believe
we
support
the
unity
maps.
E
We
support
the
process
that
is
bringing
communities
together,
aligning
community
input.
It's
looking
at
the
diversity
that
we
need
to
see
in
terms
of
ensuring
that
the
voice
of
asian
hispanic,
black
indigenous
people,
renters,
undocumented
folks,
are
represented,
and
because
we
also
ask
our
our
you
know,
neighbors
as
well,
who
also
want
to
stay
within
district
7
and
keep
hill
view
in
district
5.
We
support
the
unity
match.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
R
Hi,
yes,
my
name
is
elizabeth.
Can
people
hear
me?
Okay?
Yes,
my
name
is
elizabeth
chinhel
helen
president
of
san
jose
downtown
resident
association.
I
previously
spoke,
and
at
that
point
I
was
more
concerned
about
the
downtown
resident
association.
District
will
be
dividing
it
too,
and-
and
I
hear
today
with
unity
mappers
that
they
have
taken
that
in
consideration,
but
now
they're
moving
us
from
d3
the
entire
district
from
d3
into
d6.
So
that
poses
two
problems
from
my
perspective.
R
First,
I
think
you
speak
to
the
downtown
resident.
I
think
most
most
of
us
will
tell
you
that
we
belong.
We
feel
more
belonging
with
the
three
the
current
d3
neighbors,
rather
than
the
d6,
and
we
share
much
more
of
the
common
problems
than
we
have
with
people
in
willow,
glen
or
the
rose
garden
area
and
number
two.
R
Today's
a
new
presentation
about
disenfranchisement
also
alarming,
because
we
will
be
with
people
going
from
the
odd
to
even
district,
and
now
we
are
an
area
that's
going
through
rapid
changes
because
the
building
of
san
jose
downtown
and
because
of
coming
in
google.
So,
under
this
scenario,
when
we
move
from
d3
to
d6,
we'll
have
two
years
represented
on
the
city
council
by
person
that
we
have
nothing
to
say
and
reluctant,
and
we
will
also
experience
six
year
gap
in
our
ability
to
vote
for
a
council
representative.
R
M
Hi,
my
name
is
tim
claussen
from
the
vendome
neighborhood.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
tonight.
Community
is
defined
as
a
group
of
people
living
in
the
same
place
or
having
a
particular
characteristic
in
common.
The
venn
dome
is
one
of
the
oldest
neighborhoods
in
d3
that
shares
so
many
characteristics
in
common,
our
adjoining
neighbors,
the
hensley,
japan
town
north
side
hyde
park,
as
well
as
other
neighborhoods
like
nigley
park,
all
share
many
common
interests:
urban
in
transit,
villages,
commercial
and
residential
developments,
restoration
and
preservation
of
our
historic
homes,
the
unhoused
and
increased
crime.
M
We
stay
engaged
as
a
community.
These
relationships
have
been
forged
through
decades
of
bonding
the
unity
map
disenfranchises
us
from
these
long-established
partnering
neighbors
carving
off
the
vendor
from
downtown
core
completely
violates
the
fair
maps
act.
The
fair
maps
act
is
designed
to
easily
identifiable
defined
as
easily
identifiable
boundaries
that
follow
natural
or
artificial
barriers
such
as
rivers,
highways
and
rail
lines.
That
would
be
the
guadalupe
river
and
park,
the
87
parkway
and
the
coleman
shopping
center.
The
community
map
meets
the
fair
maps
act
while
the
unity
map
does
not
does
the
opposite.
M
The
community
map
maintains
a
geographical
integral
of
the
city
integrity
of
the
city,
which
the
fair
maps
act
clearly
states
that
the
redistricting
map
should
be
respected
in
a
manner
that
minimizes
its
division.
It's
not
the
task
at
hand
for
the
commissioners
to
do
the
right
to
do
the
right.
The
wrongs
of
our
past.
By
making
big
changes,
please
adhere
to
the
assembly
bill
number
847,
the
fair
and
inclusive
redistricting
for
municipal
municipalities
and
political
subdivisions.
Fair
map
act.
Please
recommend
community
map
for
council
consideration,
keep
the
vendomen
d3.
B
Q
Yeah,
I'm
ted
earl
neighborhood
leader
in
district
9
and
the
current
president
of
the
thousand
oaks
neighborhood
association
representing
hundreds
of
households
in
our
area.
First,
I
want
to
thank
the
commissioners
for
their
hard
work
and
diligence
in
tackling
this
task.
You've
all
put
in
many
many
hours
of
service,
and
I
want
to
acknowledge-
and
thank
you
all
for
your
efforts,
I'm
speaking
again
tonight,
to
ask
you-
continue
to
keep
the
erickson
thousand
oaks
pinehurst
and
tango
with
tatra
neighborhoods
together
in
d9.
Q
I
would
just
like
to
add
just
a
quick
comment
on
the
unity
map.
You
know
the
backers
of
that
map
have
entrenched
interests
and
deep
pockets.
You
know,
therefore,
they
can
enable
their
supporters
to
show
up
to
these
meetings
and
be
very
vocal.
Their
numbers
here
may
not
accurately
reflect
the
actual
attitudes
of
san
jose
residents.
I
believe
that
commissioner
wright
said
it
well
early
in
the
call
talking
about
the
goals
of
this
commission
are
to
maintain
the
existing
boundaries
and
neighborhood
integrity
as
much
as
possible.
Q
M
M
The
unity
map
ensures
the
reed
hill
view,
mirror
reed
hill
viewers
in
the
main
east
side
district
with
alan
rock.
I
appreciate
all
the
time
and
considerations
I've
been
watching
you
all
make
in
order
to
try
and
best
serve
your
respective
districts.
The
fact
that
you've
made
so
many
adjustments
to
your
existing
options
is
proof
that
you're
here
that
you
hear
some
of
what
we
are
saying,
but
it's
clear.
We
need
a
voice
of
the
community
to
speak
a
little
bit
louder.
M
M
The
only
way
to
do
that
fairly
is
with
the
unity
map
and,
as
we
just
found
out
this
evening,
you
will
still
be
allowed
to
oversee
the
district
that
elected
you
until
your
term
is
up.
I
am,
however,
concerned
about
the
changes.
Jeremy
plunkett
pointed
out
about
being
changed
and
who
gets
to
vote
and
when
the
d3
district
has
been
particularly
vocal,
yet
not
understanding
about
why
we
need
to
change
their
numbers,
and
I
believe
I
heard
8.4
was
the
new
p
vid
for
our
updated
unity
map.
M
So
we
have
ears
as
well,
and
we
are
listening-
it's
not
just
about
covering
a
spread
of
how
many
people
of
what
color
live,
where
it's
about
making
sure
where
these
lines
are
and
that
they're
not
cut
in
such
a
way
that
our
voices
get
drowned
out
by
the
loudest
few
have
always
gotten
their
way
with
the
way
these
communities
are
growing.
We
have
to
be
looking
to
the
future.
If
we
really
want
to
make
this
happen,
I
feel
the
uni
the
unity
map
does
this.
M
Additionally,
I
wanted
to
remind
those
neighborhoods
and
homeowners
associations
that
we
are
not
actually
going
to
build
any
walls
or
cut
any
communication
in
any
communities.
We've
been
catering
to
those
wealthy
affluent
communities
for
long
enough
to
know
that
they
are
not
going
to
listen
to
us
until
we
make
changes
happen.
M
B
D
D
Tearing
up
our
neighborhoods
would
be
really
weird
where
the
unity
map
shows
us
being
torn
at
the
west
end
of
district
3..
It
splits
us
at
san
pedro
being
part
of
the
vendome
neighborhood
and
living
on
san
pedro.
I
would
be
part
of
a
neighborhood
that
is
a
wedge
that
belongs
to
no
one
is
involved
with
no
one
and
would
be
our
section
of
neighborhood
would
be
a
little
small,
misfit
neighborhood
that
doesn't
belong
in
six
and
belongs
where
it's
always
been
and
with
its
rich
history
in
district
three.
D
So
I
support
the
community
map
and
we
are
very
tightly
knit
community
with
the
communities
around
us.
I
volunteer.
I
have
been
a
volunteer,
my
entire
life
in
this
community
and
I
am
very
very
devoted
to
my
vendome
neighborhood
and
the
neighborhoods
japantown
nigley
park.
Hensley
surrounding
areas
of
the
downtown
region,
so.
D
Hi
good
evening,
my
name
is
christa
delatore
and
I'm
here
tonight
to
voice
my
support
of
the
unity
map.
The
unimap
is
backed
by
a
growing
coalition
of
labor
community
and
civil
rights
groups,
and
it
will
work
to
keep
communities
together
and
ensure
that
every
single
san
jose
city
resident
has
a
fair
say
in
the
representation.
D
Unlike
the
d4
and
community
maps,
unimap
will
not
dilute
the
voices
of
working
people
or
marginalized
communities
compared
to
the
other
maps.
The
unity
map
is
by
far
the
best
for
working
families
and
renters.
It
unites
renters
in
the
dense
neighborhoods
of
downtown
central
and
south
san
jose.
It
also
works
to
unite
multi-family
neighborhoods
along
the
I-85
corridor
like
hoffman
villamonte.
D
These
areas
have
been
poorly
represented
in
the
past,
and
so
this
would
help
give
working
families
and
communities
of
color
who
often
rely
on
rental
housing,
a
chance
for
leadership
that
better
represents
their
needs.
The
unity
map
also
works
to
address
san
jose's
history
of
redlining,
while
keeping
communities
of
interest
together.
D
B
B
Wade,
I'm
going
to
move
on
to
somebody
else.
Please
put
your
hand
back
up
and
see
if
you
can
get
your
microphone
fixed
sandra
d,
followed
by
janice.
R
R
One
thing
if
I
was
a
commissioner
that
I
would
appreciate
would
be
a
summary
map
that
compared
the
community
map,
the
commissions
map
and
the
unity
map
all
on
one
page,
so
I
could
see
if
we
were
indeed
where
the
numbers
were,
what
the
deviation
was,
what
the
facials
racial
makeups
are
and
what
the
populations
were.
So
I
would
personally
like
to
ask
redistricting
partners
to
put
that
together,
so
all
of
us
could
see
it
in
one
page.
R
Thank
you.
I
would
like
to
tell
you
that
I've
listened
to
these
items.
I
find
them
very
interesting,
but
I
feel
that
the
community
map
and
the
commission's
map
are
less
drastic,
still
provide
adequate
representation
for
all
voices
in
the
city.
The
unity
map
is
very
driven
and
very
broken
up
and
what
it
does
to
d3
and
several
of
the
other
districts,
including
d10,
is
just
not
what
I
would
vision
for
uniting
the
city.
But
thank
you
again
for
your
time.
I'm
hoping
that
next
time
I
get
to
see
a
summary
map.
S
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
yes,
okay,
so
I
agree
with
the
person
that
went
before
me.
It's
basically.
We
would
like
to
see
the
differences
between
all
the
maps,
but.
S
S
K
I
am
here
again
to
express
and
manifest
my
strong
support
for
the
unity
map,
a
map
that
ensures
the
political
voice
of
working
people
and
tenants
like
me,
and
our
community
members,
san
jose,
has
a
history
of
his
racist
redlining.
That
largely
coincides
with
our
current
lines.
The
unity
map
will
write
that
historical
wrong.
This
is
the
only
way
for
us
to
move
forward.
The
uni
team
map
promotes
fairness,
conforming
to
the
fair
maps
act
and
the
california
voting
rights
act
as
a
and
as
a
resident
of
d4.
I
really
like
that.
K
E
Good
evening,
commissioners,
thank
you
for
your
time
once
again,
detective
moreno
here
again
and
to
show
support
for
the
unity
map.
I
just
feel
that
this
is
the
best
map
and
just
like
the
previous
caller
said,
we
cannot
do
the
fix
the
wrongs
of
the
past,
but
we
can.
We
can
fix
the
wrongs
of
the
present,
so
the
unity
map
does
that.
E
I
hope
you
choose
to
be
on
the
right
side
of
history
in
san
jose
history,
because
growing
up
in
this
town,
we
were
always
left
out
in
the
east
side.
So
please
keep
the
site
together
and
please
support
the
unity
map.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
your
time
have
a
great
evening.
E
Hi
claire
beekman
here
thank
you
for
your
meeting
tonight,
I'm
getting
the
feeling
you're
starting
to
solve
the
split
district
issues
of
district
six.
Thank
you
for
that.
I
guess
with
that
problem
being
worked
on.
I
think
that
leaves
issues
of
district
7
district
3
district
5.
E
To
consider.
I
have
a
real
question
that
all
the
maps
these
days,
they
don't
show
the
street
names
on
them.
This
issue
was
an
issue
in
the
beginning
of
the
sessions.
We
let
it
go
for
a
bit.
E
I
hope
you
can
start
to
put
street
names
on
the
future
of
these
maps,
so
we
can
get
a
very
exact
picture
of
where,
where
things
are
gonna
be
because
what
are
we
going
to
do
about
the
future
of
the
gardner
area
and
where
exactly
is
is
is
district
7,
6
and
3
gonna
make
the
connection
I
think
it
can
go.
You
know
up
closer
a
little
bit
past
the
freeway
into
the
reed
williams,
neighborhood
area,
south
of
san
jose
state.
E
I
think
seven
can
go
that
far
and
I
think
we
need
to
learn
that
district
three
doesn't
have
to
take
on.
It's
got
a
lot
of
things
and
it's
got
the
airport.
It's
got
three
or
four
bart
stations
in
it.
E
It's
got
a
bunch
of
economic
items
that
I
think
I
think
we
can
afford
to
to
push
into
district
three,
a
little
bit
more
district,
three
district,
six
and
district
four
were
all
built
on
huge
districting
in
the
past,
so
they
could
be
in
huge
economic
engines,
and
I
think
it's
time
to
consider
you
know
the
equity
engines
of
of
d7
and
and
how
it
can
really
move
close
to
the
google
village
area
as
much
as
possible
and
and
into
perhaps
the
the
san
jose
state.
Neighborhood,
it's
a
good
fit.
E
J
Hi,
my
name
is
dr
forrest
peterson,
I'm
here
to
speak
on
in
support
of
unity
map.
I
am
a
researcher
at
stanford
university
in
civil
and
environmental
engineering.
However,
for
the
last
five
years,
I've
been
doing
research
in
career
technical
education
in
for
the
construction
industry,
and
I,
through
listening
to
the
discussion,
I
was
invited
by
some
colleagues
to
to
tune
into
this
and
better
understand
the
demographics
that
I've
been
working
with
for
these
years.
J
I've
worked
predominantly
with
students
in
district
4
in
district
7,
but
I'm
now
aware
that
I
have
not
worked
with
students
in
district
5,
which
actually
seems
a
little
bit
seems
a
little
bit
like.
I
should
have
been
working
with
students
in
district
5
and
then,
of
course,
I
worked
with
the
college
over
in
district
8.
and
one
of
the
projects
that
my
students
work
on
is
redlining
and
environmental,
justice
and
social
justice
and
each
year
I
task
these
high
school.
J
Public
policy
or
from
a
regional
development
standpoint,
and
I'm
thinking
that
this
year,
regional
development,
regional.
J
They
live
in
and
then
just
having
grown
up
in
the
south
county.
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that
district
two
and
ten
actually
looks
fairly.
K
Hi
good
evening,
commissioners,
thank
you
for
your
time
this
evening
and
for
letting
us
all
speak.
My
name
is
maria
rocha.
I
would
like
to
express
my
concern
this
evening
for
a
lot
of
these
of
the
maps
here
that
were
stated,
especially
the
barriers
of
penitentia
nor
and
north
san
jose
area.
I
am
in
support
of
the
unity
map
and
it
doesn't
limit
me
but
other
complete,
competing
neighborhoods.
K
These
maps
keep
our
community
together,
as
it
should
be,
and
we
know
that
during
the
census
of
2010
our
berry
as
a
community
came
together
to
demand
all
of
their
neighborhoods
to
be
included
into
the
council
district,
which
was
a
very
important
time.
It
would
be
unfair
and
not
right
to
split
this
wonderful
community
of
interest.
It
would
be
great
also
to
see
a
change
in
all
of
these
maps.
It
would
help
all
the
communities
that
are
less
fortunate.
It
would
be
it
would
like.
K
I
would
like
to
see
the
help
be
directed
and
helping
the
lefty
latino
black
and
asian
communities.
The
community
maps
helps
us
keep
keeps
us
all
together
and
united
as
one.
I
would
definitely
not
want
their
voices
to
weaken
or
split
among
other
competing
neighborhoods.
Thank
you
this
this
evening.
For
your
time,
commissioners.
B
J
Hi,
my
name
is
neil
park
mclintic,
and
I
am
one
of
the
community
organizers
for
the
unity
map,
and
I
wanted
to
express
support
today
for
the
unity
map
fittingly,
but
on
a
serious
note.
As
someone
who
does
identify
with
the
lgbtq
community
as
an
openly
bisexual
person
and
a
happy
relationship
with
another
man,
I
think
it's
really
important
that
the
the
unity
map
has
found
a
way
to
incorporate
all
of
the
heavily
lgbtq
areas
of
interest
into
one
single
district,
including
the
area
along
the
alameda
corridor,
which
has
the
bill
wilson
center.
J
A
rainbow
crosswalk
and
many
young
multi-family
renters
in
newer
housing
who
are
disproportionately
in
that
category
of
lgbtq,
along
with
post
street,
which
has
become
sort
of
a
new
spot,
a
new
hub
with
sort
of
the
the
queer
club
there
being
the
anchoring
point
and
sofa
as
well,
which
also
tends
to
be
home
to
many
different
lgbtq
events
done
by
silicon
valley,
pride
and
others
such
as
the
the
drag
show.
That
is
the
first.
I
believe.
J
R
B
R
Me
hello,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
yes,
yes,
oh
hold
on
hold
on.
Let's
see,
oh,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
yes,
oh
okay,
great
okay,
good,
maybe
start
over
all
right.
So
basically,
if
you
want
to
reset
the
clock,
that'd
be
great.
So
well,
you
know
I
like
what
somebody
said.
Our
little
brains
need
help
and
the
fact
is
you're
one
you're,
not
letting
us
know
about
the
meetings,
thank
goodness
for
being
friends
with
blair
beekman.
R
Let
me
know
about
it
and
then
you
know,
like
I
love
that
in
my
charter
review,
commission
I've
been
getting
emails.
You
know
saying
this
is
the
agenda.
This
is
the
date.
Maybe
I
didn't
sign
up,
but
you're
not
making
it
easy
to
know
how
to
sign
up
and
what
to
do
that.
So
we
get
notified
of
these
strange
meetings
on
strange
days
and
I
guess
it
used
to
be
on
another
day.
R
These
meetings
were
on
thursday,
then
all
of
a
sudden
today
so
anyway,
so
that
would
be
very
helpful
for
more
better
community
outreach.
Then,
in
terms
of
you
know,
the
maps
you're
like
I
like
what
the
woman
said,
our
small
brains,
it's
very
difficult
and,
like
blair
said
you,
don't
show
us
the
the
names
of
the
streets,
and
so
you
really
hard
to
know
where
it's
really
cut
off
like
in
terms
of
the
unity
map,
where
district
six
gets
that
little
island
in
it.
R
I'm
not
sure
if
my
neighborhood's
in
it
or
not
so
these
are
these
are
critical
issues.
You
can't
read
the
maps
and
when
somebody
recommended
that
we'd
be
able
to
compare
these
maps
side
by
side,
I
really
think
we
do
need
a
more
public.
You
know
discussion
that
could
be
like
a
a
webinar
about
this
and
we
can
look
at
it
together
and
and
discuss
things.
You
know
more
in
more
granularly
and
I
I
did
like
the
unity
map
because
of
my
having
trouble
with
my
own
neighborhood
association,
part
of
district
six.
R
Actually,
even
my
my
my
council
member
dev
davis,
you
know
I
like
the
fact
that
I'd
be
more
engaged
with
district
three,
because
I
feel
more
alignment
with
their
their
council
member
and
their
issues,
which
are
not
about
jobs
and
economic
gain,
but
more
about
basic
needs,
and
I
think
we
need
to
get
back
to
that.
So
I
like
the
idea
of
being
closer
to
the
people
of
district
3
versus
my
district.
R
K
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
I'm
sorry,
okay,
I
was
mute,
my
name
is
sarah
wing
and
my
family
lives
in
district
6.
For
that
case,
we
support
the
community
map
that
keeps
our
community
together
and
we
strongly
oppose
the
unity
map
seems
to
me.
The
unity
map
is
published
by
some
special
interest
group
and
one
of
them
is
asian
law
alliance.
My
family
is
asian
american,
I
have
to
say
the
asian
alliance
does
not
and
cannot
represent
my
family
and
our
asian
community.
R
Hi,
can
you
reset
the
clock?
Please
hi.
Thank
you,
commissioners,
for
all
your
time
and
hard
work
on
this
issue.
I
do
not
envy
the
task
you
have
ahead
of
you.
This
is
the
fourth
redistricting
meeting
that
I
have
attended
and
I
find
that
I'm
disheartened
by
the
divisiveness
that
is
being
fomented
by
special
interest
groups
that
ironically,
call
themselves
a
unity
map.
Our
city
has
many
issues
that
we
are
dealing
with,
but
with
a
focus
entirely
on
race.
This
map
is
creating
wedges
between
neighborhoods
that
have
worked
together
for
years.
R
Last
week,
the
commissioners
spent
almost
55
minutes
listening
to
and
then
dissecting
the
community
map
presentation
with
their
comments
and
questions,
the
unity
map
presentation
took
seven
minutes
and
there
were
no
questions
from
the
commissioners,
not
one.
This
has
puzzled
me.
How
can
the
commissioners
pass
on
a
map
to
the
council
when
they
have
not
publicly
examined
and
scrutinized
and
questioned
it?
R
In
addition
to
a
large
amount
of
market
rate
housing,
we
need
to
pay
attention
to
population.
The
community
map
has
adhered
rigorously
to
the
rules
of
redistricting
keeping
communities
of
interest,
contiguity,
compactness
and
other
requirements.
I
am
asking
the
commissioners
to
examine
the
unity
map
with
the
same
necessary
attentiveness
to
detail.
I'm
asking
the
commissioners
to
send
the
community
map
to
the
city
council,
no
special
interests
or
deep
pockets
are
involved
in
the
community
map.
This
map
has
undergone
rigorous
discussions
with
many
existing
communities
of
interest.
M
M
D
D
In
addition
to
adhering
to
the
redistricting
principles,
they
have
made
a
concerted
effort
to
speak
with
neighborhood
associations
and
residents
to
create
a
map
that
keeps
communities
intact
across
the
entire
city
of
san
jose,
including
downtown
and
the
surrounding
area.
The
unity
map
does
not
unify
my
neighborhood,
the
vendome.
I
strongly
encourage
you
to
submit
the
community
map
to
city
council,
as
it
is
the
only
map
that
keeps
neighborhoods
and
communities
unified.
Thank
you.
S
Hi
this
is
annie
and
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
share
my
views
with
my
community.
I
wish
to
express
my
support
for
the
community
map
because
it
maintains
my
neighborhood,
the
ventum.
I
know
you've
heard
from
a
lot
of
us
this
evening
in
district
3
and
it
meets
the
state
required
and
adopted
criteria
for
redistricting
as
opposed
to
the
unity
map,
which
removes
the
venn
dome
from
district
three
or
worse
places.
S
Some
a
small
number
of
the
homes
in
our
neighborhood
in
a
different
district
which
does
not
conform
with
the
state
criteria
specifically
state
criteria,
requires
that
districts
maintain
content,
contiguity
and
maintain
neighborhoods.
The
community
maintains
continuity
of
the
residential
apartments,
condos
duplexes
and
homes,
with
the
adjacent
residential
areas
of
the
hensley
and
japan
town.
These
are
similar
neighborhoods
with
the
same
goals
and
purposes
and
will
share
the
future
urban
village.
The
unity
map
severs
the
vendome
from
its
contiguous
neighborhoods,
thereby
dividing
our
shared
concerns
and
purposes.
S
Further.
The
state
right
criteria
requires
that
redistricting
maps
follow
the
lines
created
by
natural
and
artificial
boundaries
and
maintain
geographic
compactness
to
ensure
continuity.
The
vandom
is
separated
from
all
other
districts
by
the
expressway,
the
guadalupe
river,
a
railway
and
city
buildings.
The
community
map
observes
observes
these
boundaries,
while
the
unity
map
does
not.
D
Hi
good
evening,
first
of
all,
thank
you
for
all
the
commissioner
for
your
hard
work
and
your
time
I
would
agree
100
with
a
previous
speaker
that
you
should
try
to
put
all
the
maps
together.
So
we
can
have
a
better
visual
to
understand
the
differences,
I'm
here
to
support
the
community
map,
and
I
I
hope
you
can
advance
it.
It
is
the
map
that
puts
together
by
the
neighborhood
volunteers.
D
D
Go
hi,
my
name
is
sherry
taylor
and
thank
you
for
giving
me
the
opportunity
to
speak.
This
has
been
a
very
interesting
meeting.
I've
never
said
it
on
a
registered
meeting
and
it's
so
I
I
love
how
democracy
and
action
is
working,
so
I
am
calling
in
support
of
the
community
map.
I
the
one
thing
I
do
have
to
say
of
listening
through
the
whole.
D
All
the
conversations
is
how
you
know,
in
spite
of
the
fact
that
when
I
look
at
the
unity
map,
I
don't
feel
like,
I
feel
like
it's,
not
as
good
as
the
community
map.
It
just
concerns
me
that
we
have
to
use
a
lot
of
language
that
is
divisive
when,
in
the
end,
we're
all
part
of
san
jose
and
we're
all
human
beings
and
we're
all
working
together
to
make
the
city
better
and
so-
and
I
don't
I
haven't,
heard
that
coming
from
anybody
supporting
the
community
map
side.
D
So
I
again,
I
thank
you
for
your
hard
work
and
that's
all
I
have
thank
you.
Q
Q
Q
All
those
special
interest
groups
are
important
and
their
voice
is
important
and
their
concerns
are
important.
But
when
you
look,
I
look
at
the
map
and
I
see
they
split.
The
street
of
san
pedro
san
pedro
street
is
split
out
of
the
neighborhood.
I'm
in
so
san
pedro
is
connected
over
a
river
over
a
highway
over
railroad
track
over
the
airport,
free
building
zone,
to
rose
garden
and
that's
the
middle
of
the
street.
That
means
neighbors,
who
are
20
feet
apart,
are
in
different
districts.
Q
That
seems
absurd,
and
that
can
only
happen
in
a
non-grassroots
organization,
a
special
interest
group
and
it
sounds
like
a
bad
term
special
interest
group,
but
I
don't
think
it
is
necessarily,
but
in
this
case
there's
a
real
disconnect
between
what
their
interests
are
and
what
the
actual
on-the-ground
needs
are.
So
I'm
calling
in
support
of
the
community
map.
Thank
you.
E
Yeah,
can
you
hear
me
now
yeah
all
right,
yeah
give
me
one
sec,
so
yeah
good
evening,
my
name
is
mendoza,
I'm
a
community
member
at
district
7..
E
E
Remember
back
in
the
day:
okay,
you
guys
know
what
we're
trying
to
do
as
a
community,
how
we've
been
treated
okay,
the
latinx,
the
indigenous,
the
blacks,
the
asians
okay,
and
in
my
heart
I
feel
the
equality
as
possible,
okay
and
and
and
the
unity
map
shows
this.
I
know
it's
a
little
different
and
everybody's
scared
of
having
different,
but
I
think
different
is
good.
It
gives
people
honest
and
straight
okay
and
remember
every
man
everybo,
everybody
has
the
right
of
of
happiness
and
I
believe
they
and
and
more
especially
the
pursuit
of
happiness.
E
Okay,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
I
call
upon
you,
commissioners,
to
remember
how
we
were
mistreated
back
in
the
day,
and
you
guys
have
something
important
in
your
hands.
Guys
can
change,
okay,
send
the
united
map
to
the
city
council,
and
then
we
decide
when
we
get
to
the
city
council.
This
great
city
of
san
jose
is
united.
We,
we
already
united,
we're
just
discussing
what
the
future
is
going
to
be.
Don't
mistake
that,
okay,
because
we
community.
Q
Good
evening
my
name
is
elizabeth
harai
and
I
am
a
part
of
the
d9
four
corners
neighborhood,
I'm
currently
on
the
board
for
pinehurst
residents
association-
and
I
do
I've
come
to
several
of
these
meetings
in
the
last
two
weeks
and
I'm
happy
that
our
four
corners
of
thousand
oaks,
neighborhood
association,
pinehurst
residents,
association
and
erican,
erickson,
neighborhood
association
and
tatra
are
well
positioned
to
continue
to
stay
together
in
d9.
Q
I'm
opposed
to
the
unity
map
which
was
created
contrary,
contrary
to
redistricting
laws
and
best
practices,
especially
in
the
way
it
breaks
up
communities
of
interest.
As
many
people
have
said
this
evening.
I
believe
what
a
previous
commentator
stated
that
we
need
to
move
forward
and
you
are
the
stewards
of
this
opportunity
for
us.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time
and
working
through
all
of
this.
Q
This
has
been
a
fascinating
process
as
a
community
member
and
on
the
board
of
pinehurst
residents
association
to
see
all
of
the
different
factions
within
san
jose,
and
thank
you
for
working
on
this
on
behalf
of
our
city.
Good
night,.
D
D
Neighborhood
absolutely
does
not
make
sense
anything
that
is
happening
around
our
neighborhood
on
north
1st
street
on
taylor
street
down
moore,
where
civic
center
is
that
street
that
actually
goes
into
civic
center,
where
the
county
government
building
is
won't,
have
any
say
so
in
anything,
that's
related
to
where
they
live.
So
it
absolutely
doesn't
make
any
sense
and
also
like,
like
was
said
before,
there's
highway
87,
there's
guadalupe
river
park.
D
D
Also,
I
too
would
like
to
see
maps
that
have
street
names
on
them.
It
doesn't
seem
that
the
commissioners
or
whoever's
creating
these
maps
is
being
very
transparent
because
I'm
looking
at
them
at
home,
I
do
not
have
a
huge
50
inch
monitor
where
I
can
get
into
detail.
Looking
at
these,
I
have
a
normal
laptop.
D
D
K
Hi,
my
name
is
yuixon
martinez,
I'm
in
support
of
the
unity
map.
I
am
opposed
to
the
community
map.
I
know
a
lot
of
people
are
saying
they're
in
support
of
it,
because
you
know
the
special
communities
of
interest
or
whatever,
like
honestly,
every
community
should
be
a
community
of
interests
and,
like
you
said
before,
the
reason
these
communities
are
together
is
because
they
were
put
together
in
the
first
place
and
kind
of
every
other.
K
Colored
community
was
just
pushed
to
the
side,
and
so
there's
really,
if
you're,
just
gonna,
keep
those
lines
only
favoring
the
wealthier
communities
and
there's
really
no
point
of
changing
the
lines
right.
The
point
of
changing
the
lies.
The
lines
is
to
bring
equality
and
the
voice
to
vote
on
to
everyone.
So
if
changing
the
lines,
the
way
the
community
has
them
is
going
to
keep
all
the
wealthier
communities
with.
K
So
if
you
are
going
to
make
a
change,
make
sure
that
the
change
brings
voice
and
equality
to
the
communities
all
of
the
communities,
I
don't
care
who
communities
or
anxious
or
whatever,
because
the
only
people
that
are
communities
of
interest
are
the
ones
that
were
you
know,
put
on
there
by
redlining,
and
so
that's
really
like.
If,
if
you
don't
take
that
into
consideration,
you're
really
kind
of
just
turning
your
cheek
the
other
way.
K
N
J
It
enough
to
fill
the
back
of
a
subaru
up
with
bumper
stickers,
but
I'd
prefer
to
go
with
the
practical
side
and
go
with
the
community
map.
H
Yes,
I'm
in
support
of
the
community
map.
I
think
it
should
be
sent
forward
to
the
council
and
the
fact
that
that
the
community
map
people
were
threatened
with
a
lawsuit.
Earlier
in
the
meeting,
I
would
like
to
respond
to
that
and
say
14th
amendment.
If
race
is
a
predominant
factor
or
as
a
result
of
considering
race,
the
districts
are
very
oddly
shaped,
then
the
alliance
may
be
unconstitutional.
H
If
race
is
a
predominant
factor,
it
may
be
unconstitutional.
The
only
thing
the
unity
map
people
have
ever
talked
about
was
race.
Okay.
So,
if
you
want
to
talk
about
a
lawsuit,
it
might
be
right
there.
The
other
thing
I
would
like
to
mention
is
whoever's
talking
about
gays
and
they're,
going
to
be
in
this
district
in
that
district.
There
are
plenty
of
gays
in
district
3
downtown
they're,
not
included
over
that
to
this
preferred
district
for
gays
over
in
six
okay.
So
why
don't
you
bring
them
all
in
the
other
thing
is
vendome
neighborhood.
H
It
is
being
cut
off.
It
has
so
many
concerns
with
downtown
with
japan,
town
with
all
the
construction
with
the
d.o.t
and
all
those
things
communities
of
interest.
If
you
want
to
look
at
the
fair
map,
acts
maintain
integrity
of
neighborhoods
and
local
communities
of
interest.
The
unity
map
tears
through
district
2
district
10
district
6
district
3
without
regard
for
anything
and
by
the
way
district
6,
they
don't
seem
to
have
a
problem
with
reducing
the
white
population
in
district
6
by
7.
H
Apparently,
nobody
wants
to
highlight
that.
So
I
fully
support
the
community
map
with
especially
with
its
current
edits
today
needs
to
be
sent
through
today
to
the
council
for
consideration,
and
let
me
see
if
I
have
anything
else
and
this
all
in
this
community
and
this
unity
map
I'll,
tell
you
that
long
arm
down
into
district
six
and
squeaking
up
by
the
airport,
that
is
not
part
of
redistricting
guidelines
does
not
allow
that
stuff
to
happen
to
just
reach
over,
because
you
want
to
grab
something
here
and
there.
That
is
not
legal.
M
Hey,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
this
is
wolf
from
schneider.
I'm
a
downtown
resident
I
live
in
paseo
plaza
next
to
me
is
tower
88
the
grad
and
park
townsend.
You
want
to
put
us
into
d6
with
a
unity
map,
and
we
you
totally
separate
us
from
our
neighbors
in
the
university
district.
You
separate
us
from
neglect
park.
You
split
us
away
from
sun
sofa
district,
and
this
is
the
neighborhood
we
normally
live
in.
M
This
is
the
neighborhood
which
we
have
a
strong
bond
with
each
other,
as
neighbors
from
house
to
house,
from
homeowner
association
to
homeowner
association,
and
in
this
case
it's
really
ridiculous.
If
you
want
to
split
us
apart
like
this,
so
the
only
way
to
go
is
really
the
community
map
to
keep
downtown
intact
and
together
and
leave
us
in
the
neighborhood
which
we
live
in.
We
have
nothing
in
common.
You
know
with
the
the
sixth
district
over
at
almaden
and
rose
garden.
Thank
you.
Q
For
your
time,
so
I
just
want
to
say
the
unity
map
does
not
unify
it
divides
and
it
divides
by
design
it
gerrymanders
by
race
and
brings
up
all
of
this
class
warfare
which
merely
sets
us
back.
Q
Q
P
Hi
this
is
joe
cervantes,
I'm
speaking
in
favor
of
the
community
map.
We
hear
a
lot
of
the
speakers
in
support
of
the
unity
map
and
they
say
that
they're
for
equality,
fairness
against
redlining
and
voter
suppression,
the
unity
map.
You
know
it's
not
a
panacea.
It's
presented
as
a
remedy
for
all
difficulties,
past
present
and
future,
and
it's
not
it's
just
so
it's
a
power
grab.
P
As
far
as
I
can
tell
the
unity
map
is
a
work
of
a
cadre
of
race-based
organizations
and
they're
they're
methods,
and
you
know
the
end
game
is
pretty
clear.
If
you
look
at
what's
the
guideline
for
redistricting
population
balance.
Well,
everybody
is
doing
that.
That's
the
purpose
of
this
whole
endeavor
with
everything
else
being
secondary
communities
in
communities
of
interest.
That's
a
pretty
vague
idea!
You
know!
If
you
go
into
a
neighborhood,
you
can
see
like
oh
yeah.
This
neighborhood
is
like
that.
P
That
might
be
a
community
of
interest
unity,
map,
they're,
cooking,
up,
all
kinds
of
crazy
ideas
for
communities
of
interest
or
different
ideas.
Let's
put
it
that
way,
compactness!
Well,
they
fail
there,
my
god,
if
it's
to
be
compact,
the
the
districts
would
look
around.
You
know
spherical
or
circular,
not
like
dragons
unity,
map
dragon
map,
not
good
boundary
preservation,
also
failure
same
reason:
it's
gerrymandered
dragon,
looking
like
crazy,
so
you
know
the
unity
map,
not
good.
It's
not
good
people.
P
M
Hi,
I
strongly
urge
the
commission
to
support
the
community
map
and
its
extensive
grassroots
efforts
to
preserve
communities
of
interest
and
keep
districts
compact,
contiguous,
manageable
and
enabling
all
residents
to
have
the
best
possible
representation
in
constituent
services.
Practicality
benefits
everyone.
Please
don't
allow
district
2
to
be
wedged
in
between
districts,
9
and
10
in
the
almaden
boston
hill
community
of
interest,
which
would
create
chaos
in
the
planning
and
construction
of
urban
villages
along
boston
hill
corridor
between
almaden
expressway
and
highway
85,
which
will
help
address
the
critical
housing
needs
of
all
of
our
residents.
M
The
hoffman
via
monty
neighborhood,
has
been
very
well
represented
by
district
10
for
at
least
the
past
20
years,
and
it's
unnecessary
to
move
it
to
district
2..
I
expect
all
city
council
members,
regardless
of
their
ethnic
demographics
and
gender
orientation,
to
represent
all
of
their
constituents
equally,
regardless
of
their
demographics
and
orientations.
M
M
The
real
way
to
affect
change
is
to
roll
up
your
sleeves
work
with
your
council
members
and
organize
your
neighbors
to
identify
issues
that
affect
you
and
identify
and
promote
workable
solutions.
I
don't
believe
that
simply
changing
district
boundaries
will
affect
the
changes
that
so
many
passionate
speakers
have
been
seeking.
Thank
you.
O
O
I
want
to
be
clear
that
this
is
an
issue
that,
if
anyone
is
to
blame,
it's
the
city
for
encouraging
people
to
draw
maps
starting
from
a
blank
slate
which
guarantees
that
the
maximum
number
of
voters
will
end
up
being
disenfranchised,
and
I
want
to
point
out
that
in
the
existing
maps
under
consideration,
not
only
are
there
significant
numbers
of
voters
moved
from
d3
to
d6,
but
in
particular
the
unity
map,
moves,
significant
numbers
of
voters
from
d9
to
d2
and
d5
to
d8
and
all
of
those
people
those
whole
neighborhoods.
O
Thousands
of
people
are
going
to
sort
of
wake
up
a
polling
day
or
when
they
go
to
send
in
their
ballots
in
2022
and
be
like.
Why
am
I
not
voting
for
a
city
council
member?
I
thought
I
was
going
to
be
voting
and
it's
really
on
you
and
and
the
city
council
to
to
see
if
you
can
prevent
that
from
happening,
because
I
think
some
people
at
some
point
are
going
to
really
notice
this
and
get
worked
up
about
it.
O
It's
a
big
issue
of
the
day
across
the
country
right
now,
the
integrity
of
our
voting
and
the
fairness
of
our
voting
and
I'd
like
to
see
san
jose,
be
taking
a
proactive
stance
on
this
and
really
be
in
the
lead.
O
P
I
think
he
members
the
commission,
jeffrey
buchanan
here
from
silicon
valley.
Racing
action
certainly
appreciated
the
opportunity
to
present
the
updated
unity
map
earlier
and
would
encourage
you
to
send
that
map
to
city
council.
In
fact,
you
know,
I
think
all
three
maps
that
are
under
consideration
currently
by
the
commission
probably
are
all
deserving
of
the
city
council,
considering
more
important
than
that.
I
just
wanted
to
speak
to
some
of
the
discussion
tonight.
P
P
It's
one
thing
to
question:
what
what
what
kinds
of
decisions?
What
kind
of
ideas
people
have
it's
another
thing
to
question
the
motives,
and
I
think
it's
a
really
dangerous
slippery
slope.
You
know
we
have
organizations
who
put
this
map
together,
who
represent
tens
of
thousands
of
residents
in
the
city
of
san
jose.
We've
engaged
with
thousands
of
residents
about
the
ideas
behind
this
map
to
try
to
get
additional
input
and
you
know
have
been
working
to
iterate
and
to
work
on
these
maps.
P
You
know
I
am
not
a
special
interest,
you
know,
I'm
I'm
a
community
resident
like
everyone
here,
I
actually
volunteer
and
represent
my
school
board.
I
have
students
in
district
six
who
are
district
six
residents
who,
during
the
pandemic,
you
know
had
family
members
who
couldn't
get
a
job
who
couldn't
collect
unemployment,
who
needed
food
who
who
were
worried
about
paying
rent
checks?
You
know
these
are
the
very
families
that
are
not
adequately
represented
in
their
current
district
and
we
have
a
lot
of
claims
of
gerrymandering
being
thrown
out.
P
B
E
Thank
you,
commissioners.
I
would
like
to
ask
both
community
map,
the
community
map
presenters
and
the
new
maps,
to
please
layer
where
current
school
districts
are
at,
because
I
see
that
an
example
up
here
near
the
pension
creek
pretty
much.
All
the
schools
are
in
d4
and
toyon
used
to
be
in
d4,
and
it's
now
being
included
into
d5,
and
it
kind
of
doesn't
make
sense
to
have
communities
who
are
one
block
away
from
a
school
be
represented
by.
E
Be
represented
by
a
different
district
and
same
thing
down
with
alan
rockin
and
ocala.
I
think
that
is
also
very
important
community,
where
we
send
our
children
to
where
we
send
our
children
to
school
and
then,
when
we
go
ahead
and
draw
lines
that
basically
separate
us
that
that's
kind
of
separating
a
community,
so
I
encourage
both
maps
to
consider
mob
brewery
and
toyon
to
be
part
of
d4
district.
Four,
because
that's
what
it
was
and
that's
a
natural
line
to
continue
to
keep
that
community
together.
Thank
you
very
much.
E
Yes,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
and
thank
you,
commissioners,
for
all
your
hard
work,
I'm
with
the
northside
neighborhood
association
and
over
the
years
our
neighborhood
association
has
interacted
with
the
following
neighborhood
associations
close
to
us:
hensley,
japantown,
vin,
dumb
hyde
park,
san
jose,
downtown
residence,
spartan
keys
julian
st
james
negley
park,
campus
community
rosemary
gardens,
brookwood,
terrace,
guadalupe,
washington,
madera,
horning
and
others,
and
so
what
do
we
all
have
in
common?
We
all
have
geography
in
common
and
that
all
of
these
neighborhoods
surround
the
downtown
core
and
we
share
similar
issues
similar.
A
Thank
you,
tony
yeah.
We
before
we
go
back
to
the
commissioners.
I
wanted
to
just
ask
the
city
attorney
a
question
regarding
the
issue
that
was
brought
up
by
mr
plunkett
and
whether
or
not
you
have
an
opinion
on
that
issue
or
or
is
that
something
that
you'd
have
to
come
back
on.
A
J
Yeah,
so
it
it,
he
correctly
cited
a
supreme
court
decision
from
the
state
of
california.
I
haven't
looked
at
that
fully,
but
it
is
common
practice
for
municipalities
and
jurisdictions
that
have
council
districts
to
to
stagger
them,
and
it
is
a
reality
of
redistricting
that,
as
you
move
boundaries
along
around
to
accommodate
population
growth,
that
certain
voters
will
not
be
electing
a
representative
in
an
upcoming
election.
I
have
to
wait
six
years
as
he
stated,
but
this
is
not
something
that,
as
I
understood,
is
considered
a
disenfranchisement
that
is,
that
is
illegal.
A
The
other
thing
I
the
other
two
items
I
just
wanted
to
ask
chris
there's,
been
a
lot
of
talk
about
comparison,
maps
or
sort
of
putting
maps
on
top
of
each
other.
Is
that
something
that's
possible
or
is
it?
Is
it
too
difficult
from
a
technical
standpoint.
F
I
don't
know
where,
to
start
with
that,
I
guess
there
is.
There
are
ways
to
do
it.
One
of
the
one
of
the
ways
to
compare
is
to
use
the
html
web
maps
go
back
and
forth.
We
haven't
developed
a
technology
to
allow
for
those
to
be
superimposed
on
each
other.
F
At
this
point
there
are,
there
are
ways
to
do
that.
It's
just
not
something
that
we've
created
for
the
for
the
commission
and
at
this
late
hour
I
don't
think
something
we
could
do
by
the
17th.
A
F
Yeah,
so
the
pdfs
are
there
for
overviews.
The
web
maps
are
there
to
zoom
into
street
level
and
make
comparisons.
So
that's
the
point
of
the
web
maps
that
we've
provided
with
each
of
these
variations.
If
you
wanted
to
have
street
light
street
names,
you
would
probably
need
to
develop
a
map
that
was
maybe
30
or
40
feet
by
30
or
40
feet
to
be
able
to
get
the
entire
city
of
san
jose
and
all
of
its
streets
on
a
map.
So
it's
just
not
it.
F
You
know
you
always
have
to
make
choices
with
maps
and
we've
focus
on
neighborhood
lines
and
major.
You
know
freeways
and
major
major
streets
for
the
pdfs,
and
then
the
web
maps
are
really
designed
for
exactly
that.
So
you
can
zoom
all
the
way
in
to
almost
see
where
your
house
would
be
and
zoom
all
the
way
out
to
see
the
whole
this
whole
map,
so
it
it
gives
you
that
granular
ability
to
to
look
at
a
map
and
make
sure
that
the
dividing
line
is
right
for
your
neighborhood
or
for
your
community.
A
C
Hey
no,
what
I
was
gonna
speak
on
was
what
you
just
stated:
discrete
means
and
an
overlay.
C
I
would
like
to
see
if
it's
possible
to
bring
back
up
district
seven
to
make
sure
that
we
we're
clear
on
goodyear
mystic,
because
I
I
think
it
was
cons
that
was
going
to
be
moved
out
or
it
was
moved
out
of
district.
Seven.
F
A
I
was
just
going
to
say,
but
before
you
do
that,
I
just
wanted
to
go
to
commissioner
fatham
real
quick
to
see
if
he
had
questions
on
on
those
three
items
that
I
brought
up.
E
I
do
thank
you,
I
think
what
I'm
seeing
is.
I
think
what
the
confusion
was
from
hearing
everybody
saying
about
the
street
names
and
so
forth
is
earlier
on.
We
had
the
web
versions
the
link
to
the
web
versions
of
the
maps
that
were
attached
to
the
agenda,
though,
and
those
weren't
in
the
last
couple
meetings.
E
So
I
think
what
would
help
the
public
a
lot,
especially
now
that
we're
down
to
the
three
maps
is
if
the
links
to
the
web
versions
were
attached
for
them
to
easily
go
to
the
agenda
and
click
on
that,
and
I
think
that
would
help
the
public
a
lot
because
they
it's
not
easy
to
navigate
and
for
them
to
find
the
web
versions.
So
they
can
zero
in
and
actually
see
the
street
names.
F
I
I
will
work
with
tony
to
make
sure
that
the
web
links
are
included
as
well.
I
think
they,
I
thought
they
were,
but
no
matter
going
forward.
You'll
have
the
web
web
versions
of
whichever
maps
you
move
to
the
next
to
the
17th.
For
the
your
final
meeting.
A
Okay,
thank
you
and
then
I
guess
if
there
aren't
any
more
comments
or
questions
on
street
names
or
overlays
over
lane
maps
or
anything
of
that
nature,
we
can
go
back
to
miss
commissioner
sid
barry's
request
on
looking
at
the
goodyear
mastic
again.
F
Yeah,
so
this
was
one
that
one
of
the
changes
that
were
made
that
was
made
sorry,
I
may
have
been
a
little
fast.
Can
everyone
see
the
see
them
aptitude
now?
Yeah?
Okay,
so,
commissioner,
sid
barry,
we
have
moved
districts.
F
F
F
And
again,
like
reset
everybody,
currently,
this
is
not
a
legal
map.
District
six
is
seven
percent
over
or
under
and
district.
Five
is
six
point:
six
nine
percent
over.
C
C
You
know
what
you
know
with
the
influx
of
of
citizens
in
the
various
districts.
Your
population
is
going
to
change,
and
I
think
someone
spoke
to
that
one
of
individuals
that
came
on
to
make
a
comment
that
that's
something
that
we
really
need
to
take
into
consideration
is
that
we're
gonna
have
to
somehow
another
make
some
adjustments
as
to
how
these
alliance
are
going
to
be
drawn,
because
you
know,
with
the
increase
of
population
a
lot
of
these
districts
to
make
things
balance
out.
C
You
may
have
to
break
into
some
of
these
other
districts
to
make
it
feasible
to
give
each
person
or
each
district
or
equal
share.
I
know
that
commissioner
martinez
was
concerned
about
the
latino
vote
in
district
five.
I
think
it
was
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
you
know
we
want
to
make
sure
that
when
we
discuss
these
things
about
moving
these
lines,
let's
just
make
sure
that
we
also
include,
in
that
conversation
the
breakdown
of
the
populations,
the
various
groups.
C
F
S
A
There
we
need
to
do
some
work
on
this
map
and
I
see
that
commissioner
alvarez
has
her
hand
up,
and
so
you
have
the
floor.
Commissioner
alvarez.
S
A
Thank
you,
commissioner,
did
levison.
I
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
mean
we've
made
some
changes
and
that's
fine,
but
I
mean
the
bottom
line
is
to
get
the
map
into
compliance.
You
have
to
bring.
I
I
think
part
of
d3
down
into
the
keys
area
to
gain
population,
take
some
away
from
seven
to
kind
of
equalize
those
out
and
then
six
is
probably
going
to
have
to
grow
into
the
deer
dawn
station
area
and
hopefully
that's
enough
population,
basically
using
87
as
the
natural
boundary
up
to
maybe
julian,
I
think
or
yeah,
maybe
up
to
west
julian,
at
least
santa
clara
street,
but
maybe
up
to
west
julian,
and
that
connects
to
stockton,
which
is
already
existing
boundary.
I
And
maybe
that
gives
you
enough
population
to
kind
of
balance
it
out.
But
if
you
don't
make
that
move
or
those
moves,
then
you've
got
to
kind
of
revert
back
to
what
we
were
talking
about.
I
Originally,
that's
those
are
the
three
districts
that
have
to
work
together
and
there's
only
so
many
moves
you
can
make
in
that
and
that
basically
that
triangle,
if
you
will
so
either
we
go
back,
we
shift
things
around
and
move
deeredon
back
into
six,
which
then
it
kind
of
splits
some
of
the
area
which
might
be
more
of
a
natural
fit
into
three.
So
be
it.
I
mean
six
and
three
been
working
together
in
that
area
for
a
long
time
or
we
can
go
back.
I
I
think
the
third
option
is
to
put
goodyear
mastic,
guadalupe
washington
and
gardner
all
into
six
and
move
three,
maybe
down
into
seven.
So
I
mean
those
are.
I
don't
see.
Many
other
plays
besides
those
three
to
balance
the
population
out
amongst
those
three
districts,
because
six
can't
move
west
six
can't
move
south.
I
So
that's
where
the
move
has
to
happen,
and
you
know
any
way
we
cut
the
cut
the
pie.
If
you
will,
there
are
going
to
be
certain
residents
who
maybe
aren't
don't
find
that
to
be
optimal,
but
we're
trying
to
achieve
the
least
amount
of
disruption
possible
while
keeping
neighborhoods
together
and
not
diluting
their
voice,
and
so
I
think
one
of
those
three
moves
or
the
moves
we
should
make
and
again
I
would
welcome
the
feedback
from
district
three
in
district
seven.
I
I
Yeah,
I
think
you
have
to
for
purposes
of
the
population
balance
because
of
how
imbalanced
we
are
right
now,
you're
going
to
need
to
include
those
residential
neighborhoods
that
are
in
that
portion,
just
west
of
87
yeah
right
in
there.
You're
gonna
have
to
include
all
of
that
into
six
in
order
to
gain
a
meaningful
population
increase
to
rebalance
between
six
three
and
seven.
I
That's
the
only
move
north
that
makes
sense
any
further
north
and
you're
really
breaking
into
really
what
is
purely
kind
of
downtown's
zone
of
influence.
If
you
will
and
so
that's
kind
of
the
area,
if
you're
going
to
move
north
and
if
you're
not
going
to
move
north,
then
you
need
to
move
district
6
slightly
east,
and
let
me
tell
you
something
from
personal
experience.
I
I
Those
neighborhoods
do
share
some
commonalities
and
the
populations
in
there
are
changing
a
little
bit.
I
guess,
as
some
of
the
overflow
from
willow
glen
spills
into
those
neighborhoods,
so
while
it
hasn't
been
a
natural
fit,
I
don't
think
if
you
keep
them
together:
goodyear
mastic,
guadalupe,
washington,
gardner,
north
willow
glenn.
There
is
some
definitely
some
unity
of
interest
that
would
respect
those
neighborhoods
without
splitting
them
into
three
districts.
But
again,
if
you
want
to
keep
them
in
their
original
districts
in
three
and
seven
you've
got
to
move
north
into
deer
dawn.
F
Sure
so
would
you
want
to
move
to
santa
clara
or
well
here,
let
me
show
you
to
santa
clara
and
then
we
can
go
farther.
G
Let's
try
just
south
of
santa
clara
street
for
now.
F
I
F
yeah-
and
so
this
gets
this
gets
six
to
negative
four
0.7,
so
you'd
still
need,
I
think,
to
bring
district
like
the
district
three
and
four
three
and
five
down
reduced
their
populations.
But
this
would
get
you
you
know
part
of
the
way
there.
I
Yeah
I
mean,
I
think,
that
move
and
then
because
you
can
rebalance
a
tiny
bit
of
six
with
nine
right.
I
mean
there
are
a
couple
of
streets,
maybe
on
the
southern
border,
where
you
could
unify
cherry
or
you
could
pick
up.
You
know
a
percent
right
and
maybe
nine
goes
to
two
and
a
half
and
six
comes
down
to
three
and
a
half,
then
yeah
right
so
somewhere
along
there.
I'm
not
suggesting
anything
specific
right
now,
but
that
would
be
an
easier
kind
of
move
to
make
to
rebalance
the
population.
E
E
Then
we
would
become
even
more
negative
to
have
to
and
then
it
would
be
like
a
domino
effect
instead
of
just
trying
to
look
at
the
overpopulated
zones
at
this
point.
But.
I
I
think
the
purpose,
though,
is
to
balance
the
under
population
right.
That's
what,
if
we
get
it
down
to
this
number,
it's
about
sharing
the
underpopulation
for
lack
of
a
better
term
in
order
to
prevent
the
fracturing
of
what
I've.
What
we've
been
told
are
areas
that
share
a
very
strong
unity
of
interest
that
may
have
even
a
more
uniform
ethnic
background
in
the
neighborhoods
up
in
the
corner.
I
Well,
no,
what
I'm
suggesting
is
that
the
fact
is
that
the
original
southern
boundary
between
nine
and
six
stretched
further
south
than
it
is
right.
Now
I
mean
there
has
been
testimony
that
they
from
the
associations
that
border
those
two
communities
that
you
know
they
could
take
it
down
to
foxworthy
right
so
right
now
we're
still
north
of
that.
So
I
think
there
may
be
a
couple
of
census
tracts
that
we
could
sensibly
add
consistent
with
community
interest
testimony
that
would
not
really
disrupt
the
identity
of
those
neighborhoods,
but
maybe
I'm
wrong.
I
E
Yeah,
I
I
understand
the
making
the
smaller
moves.
The
problem
is
those
streets
that
we're
talking
about
would
definitely
then
start
fragmenting
neighborhoods
that
it
you
it
may
seem
like.
Oh,
we
can
take
a
couple
streets
here,
but
actually,
what
you're
doing
then
is
breaking
up
neighbors
by
saying
one
block
over
all
of
a
sudden
they're
no
longer
in
the
same
district,
when
they've
they've
considered
themselves
a
neighborhood
for
decades.
E
Here
right
and
it
split
along
kind
of
a
natural
line
of
the
way
it
has
gone
over
the
years.
F
I
mean
this
would
make
six
under
by
2.2.3
would
make
nine
under
by
3.7.
I
think
that's
probably
I
can
there's
not
a
lot
of
population
above
kutner.
Kurtner.
Sorry,
try
that
maybe,
but
this
let
me
see
if
I
can
try
to
use
this
order.
F
F
Would
help
balance
a
little
bit,
but
it's
still
I
mean
we
still
would
need
to
do
work
in
the
three
four
five
range,
because
this
is
still
3.0.
This
is
the
low
mark
at
3.8
percent
under
and
we
I
think
we
have
a.
We
have
one
district,
that's
6.6
over.
So
again,
that's
too
too
much
so
I
mean,
I
think,
revisiting
district
5
and
district
4
would
be
would
be
necessary.
S
I
agree
with
with
the
fact
that
we
do
have
to
look
at
the
higher
and
higher
density
as
much
as
it's
difficult
to
change
those
neighborhoods
like
in
district
five,
six
point:
six,
nine
percent
and
you've
got
district
four
at
six
percent.
S
D
I
E
L
I
would
agree
that
we
go
back
to
the
original
map,
particularly
you
know.
The
the
changes
here
that
are
dropping
that
latino
plurality
in
d5
are
are
gonna,
be
a
real
problem,
we're
gonna
hand
to
the
city
council
if
we
leave
it
that
way.
L
So
we
need
to
really
look
hard
at
some
of
this
discussion
that
we
had
because
we're
we,
you
know,
like
we
keep
talking
about
a
little
portugal,
but
this
little
portuguese
population,
that's
a
latino
population,
it's
a
business
zone
up
and
down
the
street,
but-
and
so
anyway,
it's
I
think
we
we
really
just
need
to
go
back
to
the
original
map
and
let
mr
shafi
take
a
look
at
the
suggestions
being
made
and
really
lay
out
the
numbers,
because
just
the
drop
in
the
plurality
in
the
east
side
is
going
to
be
a
real
conflict.
C
I
I
agree
by
us
going
back
to
the
original
map
we
had
last
week.
I
was
1.24,
I
think,
and
here
we
are
now
with
3.28
over
you
know,
seems
like
we.
We
don't
want
to
continue
to
go
in
a
vicious
circle,
just
continuing
to
make
changes
and
then
we're
out
of
compliance
and
the
next
week
we're
in
applying
compliance.
You
know,
let's,
let's
be
consistent,
and
you
know
that
that's
that's
what
I
want.
C
Let's
just
be
consistent
and
stick
with
what
we
have
until
we
you
know,
I
see
no
other,
no
other
way
to
do
it.
A
Okay,
is
there
a,
I
mean
it
was
somewhat
of
a
motion
made,
but
do
you
want
to
officially
someone
want
to
officially
make
an
emotion
on
that
one.
E
Actually,
that's
what
I
was
just
about.
That's
what
my
hand
was
raised
for.
I
would
hope
I
would
move
that
we
returned
to
the
original
b4
map
that
we
had
concluded
with
at
the
last
meeting,
and
then
we
have
the
unity
and
the
community
map,
and
if
chris
can
then
for
our
next
meeting
somewhat,
we
then
look
at
those
three
maps
to
see
if
there's
any
way
we're
not
gonna
be
able
to
please
everybody.
Unfortunately,
I
think
commissioner
alvarez
was
right.
E
F
And
one
point
of
clarification:
that's
community
map,
4.0
number
77136.
D
I
Can
I
can
I
just
make
one
one
comment
before
we
vote
on
on
the
motion,
so
I
just
want
to
understand
like
the
procedure
here,
we've
got
to
the
end
of
the
road,
I
think
more
or
less
we're
making
we're
going
back
to
the
original
d4.
Maybe
we'll
make
a
few
tweaks,
maybe
not
before
the
night's
over.
We
have
the
community
map.
We
have
the
unity
map,
I
mean.
I
Are
we
at
a
place
now
we
can
give
instructions
to
the
community
map
makers
and
the
unity
map
makers
to
present
their
final
version
so
that
we
can
vote
next
week
I
mean
there's
been.
There
was
basically
very
minimal.
Changes
made
to
both
maps.
Wasn't
a
lot
of
feedback
in
from
the
commission.
None
on
the
unity
map
very
little
on
the
community
map.
I
think
we
can
get
a
final
version
and
next
meeting
receive
the
rest
of
our
testimony
and
let's,
let's
vote
and
move
this
to
the
city
council,
I
don't.
S
A
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
get
I
I
totally
understand
where
you're
coming
from
commissioner.
I
just
want
to
get
clarification
from
from
the
city
attorney's
office.
My
understanding
is
that
and
again
I.
This
is
just
my
understanding
that
that,
in
order
to
give
the
public
an
adequate
time
period
to
review
sort
of
final
quote
final
maps
that
we're
considering
that
I
think
we'd
have
to
have
those
maps
in
place
at
least
seven
days
before
our
our
next
meeting.
J
72
hours
that
I
believe
that
requirement's
been
waived
because
of
the
short
time
period
to
complete
redistricting.
Just
so
that
the
commission
also
knows
that
the
council,
once
it
gets
the
recommendations
from
from
the
redistricting
commission,
is
going
to
have
to
host
a
number
of
public
meetings
themselves.
At
least
three
before
they
can
adopt
the
final
maps.
I
So
if
I
could
just
offer
an
amended
motion
to
what
commissioner
fatim
offered,
I
would
I
would
amend
and
move
that
we
instruct
the
map
makers,
who
we've
selected
to
submit
their
final
maps
for
consideration
at
our
next
public
hearing
with
the
intention
at
that
hearing
to
actually
put
those
maps
to
a
vote
on
which
ones
or
all
of
them
will
advance
to
the
city
council
for
final
map.
Drawing.
I
B
Yes,
this
is
tony
tabor
city
clerk.
I
would
assume
that
we're
going
to
limit
map
presentations
to
just
those
two,
no
new
map,
presentations,
correct
okay,.
A
B
F
B
F
One
other
thing
if
they
could
get
me
or
provide
the
clerk
final
like
either
a
district
or
link
to
their
final
map
or
a
shape
file
for
their
final
map.
Two
days
prior
or
I
don't
know
some
before
the
meeting
not
the
day
of
I
can
have
them
ready.
So
we,
if
you
wanted
to,
we
could
make
changes
to
that.
Those
final
maps.
J
A
Well,
I
think-
maybe
I
think
I
heard
I
think
it
was
commissioner
alvarez
mentioned
something
about
72
hours,
how
about
72
hours
prior
to
our
next
meeting.
I
A
I
E
A
A
B
Be
just
you
know,
my
my
notes
are
not
well
written,
okay
to
return
with
the
original
d4
map
that
was
approved
at
the
last
meeting,
as
well
as
the
community
in
unity
map,
as
presented
tonight
at
the
next
meeting,
direct
redistricting
partners
to
bring
those
three
maps
forward
again.
B
E
B
D
I
E
D
A
Right,
we
have
no
open
forum,
that's
correct,
so
I
I
don't
know,
and
then
we
we
can
technically.
We
can
continue
to
do
work
if
you'd
like
or
we
can
adjourn
at
this
point
it
looks
like
maybe
we
have.
Mr
chaffee
has
instructions
on
on
moving
forward
and
we're
certainly
gonna
have
to
do
a
lot
more
work
even
prior
to
our
next
meeting
and
in
looking
at
the
maps
that
are
submitted.
A
So
I
mean
if,
if
there
aren't
any
objections,
I
would
I
would
adjourn
the
meeting.