►
From YouTube: OCT 14, 2021 | Redistricting Advisory Commission
Description
City of San José, California
Redistricting Advisory Commission of October 14, 2021
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=894094&GUID=4505BEA3-F1B4-4DCE-9638-63264E848CB9
A
A
B
B
A
A
A
F
E
A
E
G
H
Hi
blair
beekman
here,
thank
you
just
to
quickly
offer.
I
hope
there
can
be
consideration,
as
the
city
charter
process
just
approved,
to
move
forward
the
mayor's
issues
or
the
mayor
election
issues
to
vote
for
a
mayor
in
in
presidential
election
years.
I
wanted
to
offer
just
a
simple
reminder
that
it's
important
to
consider:
it's
not
just
moving
the
election
year,
but
it's
the
years
after
the
election
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
money
involved
in
the
future
of
these
elections
in
presidential
years.
H
We
have
to
be
considering
how
to
better
involve
people
who
it's
difficult
to
have
the
money
to
to
run
for
office,
and
you
know
we
have
to
consider
how
to
open
up
those
practices
better.
The
charter
commission
has
made
some
good
attempts
and
just
to
remind
of
the
whole
purpose
of
our
election
process
and
redistricting
ideas
to
make
the
process
more
and
more
accessible
to
more
and
more
people
to
run
for
office
should
be
an
important
goal
for
ourselves.
A
F
G
G
G
Although
we
don't
have
an
agenda
item
today
for
taking
community
of
interest
testimony,
we
will
still
be
accepting
community
of
interest
testimony
and
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
provide
communities
of
interest.
Testimony
can
do
so
during
the
public
comment
section
of
this
meeting
or
any
future
meeting.
G
I
also
want
to
acknowledge
that
we've
received
public
comment
on
several
of
the
draft
maps
and
we
have
also
received
more
submedals
of
maps
from
from
the
members
of
the
public.
So
I
do
want
to
acknowledge
the
public
participation
and
the
increase
in
engagement,
since
the
draft
maps
were
were
first
posted.
G
And
I
just
wanted
to
provide
a
little
bit
more
background
for
especially
for
those
members
of
the
public
who
may
be
joining
us
for
the
first
time
and
haven't
had
the
benefit
of
the
contacts
that
we've
been
receiving
these
past
couple
of
weeks.
On
september
30th,
we
received
a
presentation
from
redistricting
partners
on
the
2020
census
data
and
the
presentation
showed
the
population
changes
within
each
of
the
districts
in
san
jose
and
given
given
the
population
changes.
G
This
commission
will
need
to
make
changes
to
the
current
district
lines
and
for
members
wishing
members
of
the
public
wishing
more
information
on
those
population
changes
and
seeing
where
the
deviations
were.
I
would
invite
you
to
view
the
presentation
on
the
youtube
page
for
our
september
30th
meeting
and
I
believe
the
actual
powerpoint
presentation
by
redistricting
partners
was
also
attached
to
the
agenda
item
for
the
september
30th
meeting.
G
G
C
You
kind
of
covered
the
things
that
I
wanted
to
talk
about.
That
moragan
is
on
the
council
agenda
for
next
tuesday,
so
she
is
present.
So
she
can
hear
the
testimony
she'll
be
able
to
make
comments,
but
she
will
be
unable
to
make
motions
or
vote,
but
I
knew
it
was
important
to
get
her
into
a
meeting
as
soon
as
possible.
So
she
would
hear
all
the
testimony.
G
G
Okay,
great
next
item
item
five
public
hearing.
So
tonight
we
are
holding
a
public
hearing
on
the
draft
maps
that
have
been
drawn
up
based
on
the
new
census
data
and
as
well
as
our
suggestions
to
redistricting
partners
last
week
to
to
try
to
show
us
maps
based
on
the
changes
and
population
based
on
the
census
data.
So
I'll
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
redistricting
partners
to
present
on
the
new
draft
maps.
I
I
Some
of
the
themes
we've
heard
throughout
is
to
keep
the
penitentia
neighborhood
in
district
four
that
dalmas
and
downtown
west
dallas
park.
Excuse
me
in
downtown
west
should
be
in
the
same
district
to
keep
filipino-american
the
filipino-american
community
together
to
keep
downtown
san
jose
together
and
then
to
keep
berryessa
together
and
one
of
the
things
I
think
that
came
forward.
I
I
But
we
have
that
ability
to
go
to
10
deviation
between
the
smallest
and
the
largest
populated
district.
If
you
choose
that
all
districts
need
to
be
contiguous,
they
need
there's
no
hopping
or
jumping
no
islands
within
districts
that
we
listen
to
the
community
of
interest.
Testimony
that's
been
submitted
and
that
we
seek
to
use
or
create
compact
districts,
and
I
think,
as
the
chair
already
stated-
and
I
just
want
to
raise
it
again
is
this-
is
your
these?
Are
your
maps,
I'm
I'm
trying
to
facilitate
the
drawing
process.
I
So
as
we
go
through
each
of
these
new
plans,
it
would
be
great
for
you
to
focus
in
and
tell
me
specific
neighborhoods
that
you
want
linked
together
in
districts
and
specific
neighborhoods
that
you
think
should
be
separated
and
in
separate
districts
because
of
their
their
communities
of
interest.
Do
not
align.
I
All
the
all
the
these,
the
draft
plans
that
we'll
be
bringing
forward
to
you
we'll
have
an
overview
map
of
the
the
total
construction
of
the
city
council
lines.
A
data
page
shows
total
population
and
deviation,
and
then
the
citizen
voting
age,
population
of
all
the
different
districts
and
then
individual
district
plans
with
all
the
data
as
well.
I
So
from
our
discussion
last
week,
it
seemed
that
the
the
consensus
was
that
plans
a
and
b
were
non-starters,
so
I've
those
have
been
thrown
or
those
have
been
removed
and
a
revision
to
plan
c
has
has
occurred,
and
so
we
now
have
plan
c2
this.
This
plan
seeks
to
unite
the
berryessa
neighborhood
and
the
penitentiary
neighborhood
into
district
4
to
make
sure
to
include
dulmas
park
with
downtown
and
to
unify
willow,
glen
and
palm
haven
together
in
a
district.
I
I
I
I
Again
and
in
district
six
as
well
needed
to
you
can
see
it
grew
and
went
east,
and
but
that
districts,
1,
9,
10
and
2
are
very,
very
similar
to
the
current
lines.
I
think
one
of
the
issues
that
we
have
with
with
the
current
lines
is
that
the
plans
are
not
contiguous.
The
districts
are
not
contiguous
and
that's
a
no-no
in
redistricting,
it's
illegal.
I
So
this
nub
in
that
is
in
currently
in
district
8
and
the
coyote
valley
area
are
all
unified
in
district
two
because
they're
they
they're
touching
they're,
not
there's,
not
a
there's,
not
a
an
island.
The
other
thing
is
this
hand
into
the
hills
from
district.
Three
is
all
in
district
four
again
to
be
contiguous.
I
So
that's,
I
think,
the
the
major
changes
from
c
to
c
two
with
the
the
data
from
for
this
plan.
Its
total
deviation
is
five
percent.
You
again
can
see
that
there
is
there's
one
district.
Five
excuse
me
is
a
majority
of
minority
latino
seat
at
52.7
percent
and
that
you
have
two
api
seats:
two
majority
minority
api
seats
and
district
four
at
51.3
in
district
8
at
56.1.
I
C3
is
in
an
f
in
an
effort
to
follow
your
guidance
to
do
a
minimal
change
to
to
the
current
lines
and
the
biggest
changes
again
are
because
of
growth,
right
district
threes
and
three
and
four
need
to
shrink
in
popular
they're,
an
area
because
they're
overpopulated,
whereas
districts,
9
and
10
need
to
become
larger
because
they're
under
populated
again.
This
is
an
overview
that
shows
all
the
neighborhoods.
I
I
I
There
was
a
little
bit
of
population
swap
between
three
and
four,
but
the
the
rest
of
the
districts
really
followed
the
current
lines.
I
think
the
other
thing
is
district.
Six
you
have
I.
This
was
an
effort
to
I
think
to
unify
the
willow
willows
area,
but
I
I
think
if
you,
this
is
a
a
very
similar
current
lines.
I
District
now,
looking
at
the
deviations,
this
deviation-
total
deviation
is
5.8
percent
and
you
can
see
that
in
this
construction,
district
5
does
not
reach
majority
minority
status,
it
stays
at
47.5
and
your
api
seats.
You
again
have
two
seats:
district
4
and
district
8
that
are
above
50
and
in
this
construction
district
seven
is
the
closest,
the
second
or
the
third
closest
asian
seat
at
46.9.
I
The
final
c4
is
an
elevation
of
the
unity
map
that
was
submitted,
I
believe
on
monday,
and
what
we've
done
pretty
much
is
follow
their
lines
as
much
as
possible,
except
for
changes
to
like
this.
This
splitting
this
is
the
the
visual
from
districtor
and
you
can
see
that
they
use
the
current
splits
in
the
coyote
valley,
with
the
little
knob
and
the
wrap
around
in
the
magenta
area
that
they
just
aren't
contiguous.
So
we've
we've
changed
those
elements,
but
that's
pretty
much.
All
we've
done.
I
I
I
Sorry,
I
I
guess
some
the
number
didn't
stay
on,
or
this
is
district
10,
I'm
sorry!
But
this
I
don't
know
the
green
one,
I'm
sorry,
but
basically
you
have
this
hand.
That
comes
in
and
another
hand
that
goes
out.
There's
some
interesting
lines
in
the
interior,
but
the
eastern
districts
and
district
seven
are
very
similar
to
the
current
lines.
These
are
seven
is
almost
exactly
the
same.
I
Now
I
think
at
this
point
it
would
be
great
if
you
wanted
to
open
it
up
and
we
could
dive
into
any
of
the
plans
you
want
to
pick
apart.
I
have
the
I
have
the
I'll
just
show
you.
I
have
the
district
images,
so
we
can
zoom
in.
I
also
have
html
and
aptitude
ready.
So
if
we
want
to
zoom
into
an
area,
we
want
to
explore
any
breaks
or
any
streets
we
can.
G
To
raise
their
hands
for
questions,
I
think
one
one.
I
guess
issue
that
we
certainly
will
need
to
tackle
is
how
to
deal
with
the
over
population
in
district
four
right,
which
some
of
these
maps
deal
with.
So
I'm
I'm
wondering
if
we
could
start
with
the
the
southernmost
boundary
lines
of
district
4
in.
I
G
I
I
So
you
can
see
that
in
this
plan
the
c4
boundaries
are
the
airport.
The
the
rosemary
neighborhood
traces
orchard
comes
across
and
uses
brokaw
it
does.
I
think
there
is
a
slight
split
of
north
valley.
The
southern
boundary
of
brook
tree
then
traces,
the
freeway
down
to
include
all
of
berryessa
and
peninsure
creek
creek.
A
I
D
I
D
So
right
now
it
looks
like
they're
in
district
4
according
to
the
c2
map.
Now
what
I've
also
noticed
with
the
district
3
map,
so
highway
280
when
it
bends
into
the
680
into
the
280
merge,
which
is
just
south
of
the
district
3
map
in
this
current
draft,
a
recommendation
to
expand
district
3
further
south
as
much
as
possible,
because
it
would
be
a
cleaner
cut
right
at
the
freeway
in
regards
to
district
lines
for
district
three.
What's
currently
existing
is
right
up
just
south
280
it
becomes
district
7.
I
D
D
I
Okay,
I
think
the
issue
two
is
gonna,
be
three
and
four
are
the
two
overpopulated
districts
so
as
we
do
that
we're
gonna
need
to
figure
out
where
six,
where
I
think
one
is
kind
of
a
in
all
the
plans,
it
kind
of
goes
in
the
unity
plan
in
c3
and
c2.
It
goes
up
into
valley
up
here
to
expand
its
population
slightly.
So
I
think
that
is,
there's
there's
other
ways
to
go.
We
could
go.
You
know
in
a
different
direction,
a.
I
D
Perhaps
a
recommendation
to
see
like
the
way
I
consider
this
map-
and
this
is
actually
city-wide
recommendation-
is
what
types
of
landmarks
are
also
involved
in
the
city,
that
what
are
we
taking
away
from
certain
districts?
And
you
know,
what
are
we
adding
to
certain
districts
in
this
case
like
district
one?
Is
that
kitty
western
corner
of
the
city?
You
know
what,
if
we
kind
of
expanded
it
and
maybe
made
the
airport
part
of
district
1.,
that's
just
the
recommendation.
D
You
know
we
could
play
around
with
that
that,
like
going
a
little
bit
north
and
maybe
taking
away
of
four
and
merging
it
to
one,
you
know
and
somehow
shrinking
district
six,
just
a
little
bit
in
because
in
district
six
from
what
I
can
kind
of
tell
here,
I
mean
delmos
park.
Is
that
in
district
6
and
this
draft
I
can't
really
tell.
D
So
perhaps
you
know
redrawing
the
lines
a
little
bit
and
maybe
like
a
recommendation
to
be
a
little
more
creative
in
regards
to
how
we
merge
the
airport,
how
we
take
into
things
like
santana
row
or
the
winchester
mystery
house.
You
know
like
those
kind
of
landmarks.
How
are
we
affecting
certain
districts
and
are
we
even
taking
you
know?
Are
we
going
to
be
adding
to
the
to
the
economy
are
going
to
be
taken
away
from
the
economy?
D
D
D
I
D
So
see
like
like
what
I'm
looking
at
right
now
in
in
the
division
here,
my
my
own
neighborhood
roosevelt
park,
that's
divided
by
two
or
almost
yeah
by
two
different
districts.
We
got
part
of
it
being
in
what
looks
like
district
three
and
the
second
half
in
district
five,
and
that's
also
splitting
up
the
brook
wood
terrace.
D
I
J
J
I
do
want
to
urge
more
outreach
to
the
community
because
I
know
for
the
district.
I
represent
district
10
here
on
the
commission.
We
have
received
limited
community
input
and
we
I
personally
really
need
that
as
far
as
as
we're
looking
at
these
maps-
and
I
know
that
you
had
mentioned
chris
in
your
presentation
about
the
need
for
feedback
from
the
community-
and
I
am
appreciative
of
those
who
are
attending
tonight-
I
think
this
is
probably
our
best
attended
meeting
yet.
J
So
thank
you
for
those
who
are
watching
tonight,
but
something
that
I
do
want
to
stress
is
that
we're
taking
a
look
at
the
school
boundaries
that
we're
not
separating
those
within
among
the
different
districts,
as
well
as
keeping
neighborhood
associations
whole
and
also
again,
encourage
that
we
keep
almaden
whole
as
well.
So
thank
you.
F
Yeah,
thank
you.
So
I
have
some
specific
comments
so
for
chris.
So
on
the
d6
that
we're
looking
at
on
c2-
and
I
just
had
to
say
that
the
maps
that
are
available
on
the
agenda-
I
don't
know
if
this
is
just
me,
but
c3
and
c2
look
to
be
the
same.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
maybe
they
got
uploaded
twice
or
what
but
just
work
with
c2.
F
I
really,
I
don't
see
it,
making
a
lot
of
sense
to
push
d6
east
of
the
guadalupe
freeway,
particularly
when
you
come
down
into
what
I
consider
to
be
the
heart
of
d6
and
you've
cut
out
north
willow,
glen
and
various
neighborhoods
that
all
access,
lincoln
avenue
and
all
the
shopping
the
restaurants
you've
cut
that
out
of
d6.
I
don't
think
that
those
two
things
standing
together
make
a
lot
of
sense.
F
That
is
kind
of
where
I
see
a
more
natural
boundary
for
d6.
But
I
do
agree
that
the
kanoa
gardens
area,
which
is
now
being
absorbed
into
what
I
think
is
district
nine.
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
So
those
are
kind
of
my
initial
comments
on
on
the
revision,
but
I
certainly
think
that
this
was
a
a
more
productive
start.
I
So
we
I
can
try
to
do
the
87
as
the
as
it's
as
its
border
and
move
it
farther
south.
But
that
also
means
that
district
9
needs
to
sorry.
District
9
would
need
to
grow
as
well,
because
again,
that's
another
9
and
10
are
the
slowest
growing
areas
of
the
whole
city
and
have
to
expand
into
they
have
to
gain
population.
F
F
I
don't
understand
that's
kind
of
counter
to
what
you
just
told
me,
because
you're
pushing
d7
west
into
southwest
into
willa
glenn,
so
I'm
just
to
the
extent
we
can.
We
can
counter
balance
this
a
little
bit.
I
think
it
would
make
sense
also
from
a
compactness
standpoint,
using
the
natural
boundaries,
the
principles
that
were
espoused
to
us
during
the
training.
As
I
understand
it,
at
least
that
would
honor
those
principles
with
more
consistency.
F
To
the
extent
possible
I
mean
I
understand
that
d9
needs
population
growth,
but
I
mean
my
first
order.
Priority
is
to
kind
of
is
the
further
north
and
then
counterbalancing
that
with
the
eastern
push
over
87
into
downtown,
because
I
think
that
that
takes
away
from
what
I
understand
to
be
some
of
the
communities
of
interest
in
d3
and
creates
in
d7
a
very
odd
looking
district
in
my
opinion,
and
it
pushes
it
pushes
into
willow
glenn,
and
it
really
is
not
a
part
of
willow
glen.
It
just
doesn't
doesn't
make
any
sense
to
me.
F
K
Yes,
I
want
to
just
add
on
just
a
few
things.
Thank
you
again
chris
for
the
presentation.
It
was
what
we
really
needed.
It
seems
like
chris
you'll,
be
coming
back
to
probably
give
us
another
presentation
with
you
with
the
maps,
so
I'm
hoping
that,
if
all
possible,
is
it
a
possibility
to
use
the
maps
that
we
had
in
2011
versus
and
have
the
maps
of
2120
that
you're
doing
now
side
by
side.
K
K
K
I
Right
it,
it
includes,
so
you
are
giving
a
little
bit
to
nine
here,
you're,
giving
up
a
little
bit
of
two
into
two
of
the
seven
trees
area,
you're,
giving
away
part
of
dove
hill
and
ramblewood
into
eight
and
then
you're
you're.
Moving
this.
This
version
moves
district,
seven
into
district
five
taking.
K
I
Pretty
close
to
that,
so
this
map
is
you've,
got
a
hundred
and
four
thousand
people,
so
it's
actually
over
deviated,
so
it
could,
it
could
shrink
if
you
wanted,
you
could
give
up
or
have
neighborhoods
move
out
of
district
7
and
to
the
surrounding
districts.
If
you
thought,
maybe
the
combination
didn't
make
sense.
K
K
I
To
think
that,
or
you
reviewed
the
district
or
maps
and
the
public
comment:
okay,
okay,
in
in
this
revisions,
I
think
one
of
the
challenges
has
been
that
you're.
I
think
at
this
point
I
don't
know
if
there's
been
new
maps
drawn
in
district
or
but
you're
up
to
60
maps,
but
I
think
about
three
quarters
of
those
maps
were
submitted
since
we've
put
out
draft
maps.
L
L
Three,
the
map
really
shows
that
the
area
of
japan,
town,
which
is
a
a
real
concern
from
the
testimonies
received,
is
cut
in
half
and
I
and
I
think
we
really
need
to
take
a
look
at
that-
needs
to
be
moved
somehow
to
encompass
the
whole
area
and
not
split
because
that
is
dividing
that
community
into
where
it
is
of
strong
community
of
interest.
So
I
am
really
concerned
about
that
part
of
the
map,
so.
I
L
I
So
this
look,
I
I'm
using
the
cities
neighborhood
the
lines
of
that
right,
you
know,
and
so,
if,
if
they're
too
small
and
japan
town
is
larger,
we
can
note
that
and
we
can
make
sure
to
unify
it.
The
one
of
the
things
that
I
did
do
with
with
this
plan-
and
I
think
you
you'll
see
in
both
c3
and
this
unity
map
in
c4-
is
that
japan,
town
both
of
these
areas,
are
united
in
one
district,
usually
in
district
three.
L
Okay,
so
my
concern
is-
and
I'm
looking
exactly
because
in
that
area
technically-
and
I
see
how
you're
going
by
the
labeling,
but
the
community
of
japan,
town
with
the
businesses
and
some
of
the
residents,
actually
do
extend
down
jackson
street
north
first,
which
is
not
in
district
three,
and
I
think
that
is
part
of
the
concern
of
what
we're
hearing
from
the
community.
And
I
think
maybe
what
we
need
to
do
is
just
take
another.
L
I
L
I
So
that
the
answer
to
that
question
is
is
complicated,
you
can
add
future
population
growth
as
a
like
an
extra
criteria,
but
I
think,
given
the
amount
of
community
of
interest,
testimony
and
the
push
to
keep
neighborhood
associations
whole
to
really
follow
major
natural
boundaries
and
streets
that
it
that,
under
under
populating
district
three,
I
guess
it-
you
know
I
we
can
explore
it.
I
just
don't
want
it
to
cause
the
other,
more
kind
of
higher
criteria,
goals
to
be
undervalued.
A
B
I
I
So
this
is,
you
can
see
so
this
you
know
these
are
the
current
lines
here
and
it
used
to
go
into
over
overtv
and
you
and
and
had
part
of
welch
park,
doesn't
look
like
it
included
all
of
welch
park
in
it.
Last
time,
but
or
currently
excuse
me,
so
we
could
look
at
this
is
just
maybe
it
would
be
a
three-way
swap
right
would
come
up
and
take
in
this
portion.
B
I
A
I
B
I
I
I
F
Yeah,
I
just
had
two
follow-up
comments
on
that
using
the
87
as
the
potential
boundary
between
or
moving
it
over
for
d3
and
d6
on
the
north
side
of
the
districts.
It
could
also,
depending
on
what
the
numbers
come
back
with
chris,
that
north
first
street,
in
my
opinion,
would
also
be
a
improved
boundary
line
as
opposed
to
what
it
looks
like
right
now.
F
F
G
M
Yes,
hi.
Thank
you,
chris
for
your
hard
work
on
all
of
this.
It's
mind-bog
mind-boggling
in
a
lot
of
ways
to
me
to
do
this.
I
had
a
question
about
district
3
and
reading
the
testimony
of
over
100
pages
that
we
heard
from
residents
there's
a
lot
of
concern
with
district
3
and
I
think
all
of
the
residents
will
represent
themselves.
I
think
better
than
I
could.
I
I
Yeah,
I
think
you'll
see
that
it's
kind
of
split,
because
you've
got
university
south
university
in
two
different
districts
and
then
center
this
part
of
the
campus
in
another.
So
I
think
c2
probably
does
the
worst
job
of
of
in
the
university
area.
I
think
in
c3
and
the
university
map
you'll
see
or
the
sorry
the
unity
map
you'll
see
a
better
construction
around
the
campus.
I
And
the
other
thing
with
with
this
map
is
that
the
87,
I
guess,
has
not
used
the
whole,
I'm
just
I'm
just
trying
to
for
yeah
district
six
would
need
to
grow
north.
You
can
see
here.
This
is
the
two.
This
is
the
87
here.
So
d6
doesn't
do
what
your
one
of
your
commissioners
just
talked
about
so
but
moving
back
to
c2.
I
M
G
D
G
J
I
I
Okay
and-
and
it
follows
the
87
like
it
currently
does
again
it
it
does-
you
know
sorry,
it
does
unify
navarez.
It
was
slightly
split
in
the
old
districts
and
then
it
basically
follows
the
same
line.
There
is
this
little
area
where
I
I
unified
rancho
santa
here,
but
then
the
rest
of
it,
I
believe,
is
the
same
line.
I
I
Because
you
can
see
the
line
here
this
because
it's
it's
not,
but
it's
not
contiguous.
You
really
can't
connect
10
to
coyote
creek
in
any
way
through
city
pro
city
land,
so
all
of
coyote,
creek
and
santa
teresa.
This
whole
area
is
all
in
district
two,
and
you
can
see
the
same
is
so
this
like
the
expanded
area
of
san
jose
is
all
in
two,
because
it's
it's
all
connected.
I
The
problem
is
you
really
can't
break
the
contiguous
rule
like
it's
either?
Yes
or
no,
and
it's
either
legal
or
it's
not
so,
there's
not
much
but
wiggle
room,
especially
when
you
have
a
school
there.
An
area
that's
connected
contiguous
is
the
second
it's
kind
of
the
second
thing
we
look
to
after
population
then
comes
community
of
interest.
So
it's
an
area
that
you
were.
You
were
given
some
leeway
in
2011,
but
in
under
the
current
law.
I
believe
you
don't
have
that
same
leeway.
I
Right
and
I
I
think,
like
the
there
is
a
so
there
is
a
map
out
there
that
shows
all
like
all
of
this
being
san
jose,
but
it,
but
under
the
under
the
actual
lines
of
the
city,
you
can
see
that
there
is
certain
areas
that
have
not
been
annexed
and
not
unified.
It's
not
like.
So
this
whole
area
right
is
not
technically
san,
jose,
like
the
white
house,.
M
Good
evening
my
name
is
chaba
bustamante,
I'm
a
member
of
latinos
united
for
new
america,
and
I
live
in
district
9..
I'm
calling
to
state
my
support
for
the
unity
map.
For
many
years.
A
handful
of
politicians
have
divided
us
into
districts
that
serve
their
political
interests
instead
of
our
community's
needs.
M
An
example
of
this
is
willow,
glen
that
was
divided
into
three
districts
when
it
makes
more
sense
to
split
it
into
two.
Between
district
six
and
district
nine,
the
southwestern
portion
of
willow,
glen
south
of
pine
avenue
west
of
creek
drive,
has
more
in
common
with
district
9,
largely
single-family,
neighborhoods
and
suburban
field.
M
M
A
We
think
that
this
does
a
important
job
of
bringing
together
some
of
our
leading
civil
rights
groups
to
look
at.
How
can
we
ensure
the
voices
of
our
latino
asian-american
black,
low-income
renter
voices
that
typically
have
not
been
as
well
served
in
the
city
have
an
equal
say
going
forward
and
that
we
respect
the
communities
of
interest
that
have
been
lifted
up
throughout
this
process?
A
Rev?
I
hope
you
take
the
opportunity
to
review
the
map,
certainly
it
it
accomplishes.
Many
of
the
goals
that
other
folks
the
commission
have
mentioned,
certainly
it
keeps
albany
valley
whole.
As
commissioner
wright
has
mentioned,
it
looks
at
a
boundary
in
terms
of
moving
district
6
to
some
extent
over
into
the
downtown,
following
that
north
first
street
line
that
commissioner
davidson
had
mentioned,
we
keep
most.
A
The
movements
we
make,
particularly
in
in
in
the
south
of
the
city,
looking
at
district
2,
bringing
its
existing
lines
moving
along
the
I-85
corridor
and
some
of
the
multi-family
neighborhoods
that
that
fit
more
of
the
character
fit
with
more
of
the
character
or
of
district.
Two
we
think
combined.
These
movements
make
sense,
reflect
the
communities
of
interest
stated
to
date
and
increase
the
the
the
equity
across
lines
going
forward.
Look
forward
to
presenting
on
this
more
in
the
next
meeting.
Thank
you
so
much.
B
O
C
And
asian
community
organizations
work
together
to
create
that
map,
and
me
specifically,
I
live
in
the
ocala
area
and
my
neighbors
really
feel
like
we're
part
of
that
alum
rock
area,
and
I
always
I
never
really-
and
our
neighbors
really
felt
like
we
were
a
part
of
the
I
think
district
silverado's
district.
We
won't
want
to
always
be
a
part
of
district
five,
so
I
was
hoping
you
guys
can
take
that
in
consideration.
O
C
B
Okay,
so
I
would
love
to
have
someone
put
the
c3
map
up.
That
was
just
there,
because
it
really
helps
to
have
a
visualization,
but
and
from
your
online
documents
you
talk
about
how
redistricting
can
keep
people
with
common
entrances,
cultures,
languages
and
histories,
bundled
together
and
in
looking
at
the
c2
map,
where
you
had
district
6,
3,
7
and
5,
dividing
up
the
university
and
downtown
area.
I
think
it's
really
important
that
you
look
at
what
are
natural
divisions,
particularly
to
downtown
and
the
transportation
corridors
through
downtown
that
are
all
running
down.
B
If
you
can't
or
won't
walk
to
downtown,
then
that
downtown
core
district
isn't
part
of
where
you
live.
So
I
don't
understand
how
they
can
think
that
some
of
these
southern
and
western
neighborhoods
relate
better
to
the
downtown
core
than
the
ones
that
have
historically
been
associated
with
them,
including
the
south
university.
My
neighbors
in
julian
st
james
horace
mann,
negley
park,
all
of
the
sun
and
san
jose
state
university
with
city
hall
in
the
downtown
core
touching
san
jose
state.
B
A
Yeah,
I
don't
think
making
district
9
bigger
would
be
better.
I
live
in
district
nine
and
at
least
the
people
who
manage
it.
Pam
foley
they
don't.
They
got
burned
out,
buildings,
potholes
and
road
diets,
and
all
these
stupid
things
you
know
she's
a
big
proponent
of
building
the
village
in
cambrian
park.
Plaza,
nobody
really
wants.
A
Able
to
attract
residents
or
visitors
to
the
area
most
of
those
high-rises
are
vacant
that
have
been
built.
They've
been
bought
up
by
speculators
by
the
way,
that's
why
they
can't
keep
anything
open
down
they're,
even
in
good
economic
times.
So
I
don't
know
where
you,
I
think
it's
a
phony
population,
that's
in
the
downtown,
the
the
students
are
only
there,
for
you,
know
spring
or
fall
and
spring
semester,
not
a
quarter
system,
but
you
guys
are
the
whole
thing's
misguided.
A
M
C
M
Hi,
I'm
I'm
bonnie
mace,
I'm
the
executive
director
of
the
santa
clara
county
school
boards
association,
and
I
want
to
appreciate
all
of
the
commissioners,
especially
commissioner
wright
this
evening,
who
talked
about
not
separating
schools
and
making
sure
that
school
districts
are
within
the
same
council
district.
I
know
when
I
was
on
the
redistricting
commission
10
years
ago.
We
really
did
try
to
look
at
that,
and
so
that's
very
important.
There
are
19
school
districts
in
the
city
of
san
jose,
so
I
really
do
appreciate
you
focusing
on
that
now.
M
In
terms
of
district
8
and
my
area,
there
was
the
the
part
that
commissioner
alvarez
spoke
about,
which
is
ob
whaley,
so
chris.
I
would
encourage
you
to
see
if
you
could
put
ob
whaley,
which
currently
is
in
district
7,
if
you
could
put
it
back
into
district
8,
because
that
would
enable
us
to
have
a
more
cohesive
district
in
the
evergreen
school
district.
And
the
last
thing
is,
I
really
appreciate
the
fact
that
you
have
maps
that
are
available
to
be
drawn
by
the
citizenry.
When
I
did
this
10
years
ago.
M
A
K
K
My
understanding
is
that
there
was
a
letter
issued
or
provided
to.
You
know
the
commission,
either
yesterday
or
today,
from
several
downtown
associations,
and
that
also
includes
some
maps
and
one
of
the
maps
is
the
san
jose
downtown
business
association,
which
is
affiliated.
You
know
also
with
a
p-bit.
The
p-bit
employs
a
service
called
groundworks,
and
my
recommendation
would
be
that
we
do
not.
K
H
Hi,
thank
you
glory,
be
thanks
for
this
meeting
tonight.
Hopefully
I
can
offer
some
sort
of
weak-kneed
opinion
to
help
out
the
process.
Here.
You
know
I've.
I've
lived
here
off
and
on
for
a
number
of
years
and
and
it
just
my
general
person-
is
not
really
respected,
but
I
really
try
to
contribute
when
I
can.
You
know
if
you
don't
have
years
of
living
in
san
jose,
it
can
be
a
mark
against
you,
but
it
doesn't
have
to
be
the
whole
world.
H
Good
luck,
how
we
can
all
work
towards
that
better
future
of
san
jose,
we're
all
trying
to
consider
at
this
time.
I
personally
feel
that
district
six
from
you
know
the
new
google
village
to
the
horseshoe
area
to
willow
glen.
To
me,
that's
district
six
I
used
to
live
by
the
santa
clara
university
border
of
san
jose.
I
didn't
I
didn't
like
being
a
part
of
district
six.
H
There
don't
ask
me
why
the
city
charter
process
was
it's
been
working
on,
how
to
add
a
few
more
districts
to
the
future
of
our
city
charter.
That
would
be
an
interesting
area
to
have
its
own
little
district.
Maybe
tied
into
the
airport
and
perhaps
in
district
2,
to
split
up
the
long
corridor
of
district
2
into
two
separate
districts
for
its
constituents.
I
think
that's
another
interesting
idea.
I
think
idea.
C3
was
really
interesting.
H
How
you
talked
about
district
three,
where
you
brought
that
over
into
the
east
side
and
made
district
five
come
into
downtown
area.
Thank
you.
That
was
interesting.
Everyone
likes
c4.
I
think
I
I
don't
want
to
argue
too
much.
I
don't
like
the
district
six
coming
up
to
the
freeway.
I
don't
know
what
else
to
say.
There's
other
stuff
I
can
add,
but
good
luck.
District
7
was
interesting.
What
you're
doing
with
that?
Good
luck
with
these
issues.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you
very
much,
commissioners.
This
is
my
first
time
and
I
started
looking
at
the
maps
on
saturday.
I
am
going
to
talk
about
current
district
3..
I
do
not
live
in
district
3.,
but
when
I
look
at
the
map
of
district
3
and
all
the
proposals,
I
feel
like
you're,
forgetting
that
there
is
a
major
institution
there,
which
is
san
jose
state
university,
and
there
are
students
that
live
around
that
and
this
university
has
a
north
campus
and
a
south
campus.
B
In
my
view,
the
communities
and,
what's
impacting
those
communities,
although
I
don't
work
for
san
jose
state,
I
can't
imagine
having
two
councils
to
deal
with
when
there's
some
issue
in
the
communities
that
are
impacted
by
the
presidents
of
san
jose
state.
So
I
really
feel
like
whatever
you're
doing
in
the
downtown
is
not
reflecting
the
communities.
Now
you
talk
about
communities
of
interest.
B
M
Hi
good
evening
my
name
is
lanis
gutierrez.
I'm
the
chair
of
the
latino
leadership
alliance,
so
really
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
speak
tonight,
and
I
am
here
to
speak
in
support
of
map
c4
and
the
unity
map.
It
was
said
earlier.
The
the
unity
map
was
submitted
by
the
asian
law
alliance
by
the
latino
leadership
alliance,
the
naacp
and
the
la
rasa
roundtable.
M
We
really
appreciate
if
you
would
listen
to
the
voice
of
these
well-respected
organizations
that
represent
the
diversity
of
san
jose
and
also
as
the
letter
which
we
submitted
states.
Our
goal
in
submitting
the
unity
map
is
to
ensure
that
communities
of
color
have
a
more
equal
voice
in
the
city's
future.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak.
C
N
Hello,
are
you
got
me?
This
is
wade
I'm
on
one.
I
live.
We
live
in
the
d3.
I
have
a
few
different
concerns
in
the
d3
van
dome
area,
a
couple
things
just
to
mention:
I'm
not
comfortable
with
all
the
special
interest
groups
we're
listening
to
tonight
the
unity
map
special
interest.
As
that
last
woman
mentioned,
it
seems
to
me
we're
dealing
with
individual
neighborhood
interests,
not
umbrella.
Special
interest
concerns
the
one
we
hear
from
a
community
or
a
group
that
special
interest
concerns.
N
I
don't
see
how
that
fits
into
these
discussions.
I
mean
to
some
extent
we
need
to
listen
to
them
and
and
take
note,
but
I
feel
like
they're
getting
an
un
unfair
amount
of
notice.
The
unity
map
itself
was
that
that
was
developed
by
special
interests
and,
and
we
keep
referring
to
it
like
it's
the
standard.
So
that
seems
a
bit
bothersome
main
concern
for
my
one
and
talk
is
relative
to
venn
dome
the
portion
of
the
of
the
venn
dome
in
japan,
town
that
you're
drawing
into
six
into
district
six.
N
N
We
have
all
that
airport
property,
that
buffer
zone
that
the
airport
creates.
You
know
nationally,
they
create
those
around
every
airport.
We
have,
we
have
a
highway
huge
airport
buffer
zone.
We
even
have
a
railroad,
so
there's
no
way
people
from
six
are
easily
commuting
or
moving
into
three.
That's
that
you
can
only
do
it
via
taylor
street
heading
in
the
highway.
There
aren't
many
ways
to
get
through
there.
There
aren't
all
these
different
feeder
streets
so
to
call
those
to
bring
those
two
areas
into
being.
The
same
area
seems
completely
illogical.
N
My
concerns
our
concerns
are
nothing
close
to
what
the
rose
garden
concerns
are.
I
don't
know
what
their
concerns
are.
I
don't
care,
I
don't
imagine
they
care
about
ours.
We're
downtown
like
negley
park
is
downtown.
Japan
town
is
downtown.
The
van
dome
is
downtown.
We
deal
with
people
leaving
the
prison
and
going
downtown
right
through
our
neighborhoods
that
go
from
downtown
to
services
north
of
us.
They
go
from
the
prison
area.
They
go
from
from
from
north
of
us.
Through
our
neighborhoods.
N
C
Hi,
I
hope
you
can
hear
me.
Yes,
okay,
I'm
delighted
that
there's
now
a
commissioner
from
district
3,
which
is
where
I
live.
I
want
to
welcome
ms
barrigan.
I
hope
I
pronounced
your
name
right
and
thank
you
for
the
comments
you
made
about
the
boundaries
of
d3
I'd
like
to
address
the
issues
of
community
communities
of
interest.
In
my
district
in
the
15
years
that
I've
lived
here
as
a
negley
park
resident,
my
community
of
interest
has
been
going
west
towards
downtown
over
the
years.
C
C
The
student
population
of
the
university
also
has
a
huge
impact
on
my
neighborhood
from
the
fraternities
and
sororities
to
the
parking
issues.
Additionally,
many
students
and
professors
live
in
nagaley.
Where
can
we
are
connected
to
other
communities
as
well,
sun,
vendome,
hensley
and
all
the
other
communities
that
make
up
the
core
of
downtown
like
japan
town?
We
also
have
strong
ties
because
of
the
shared
history
of
our
older
houses.
These
historical
neighborhoods
are
truly
the
heart
of
downtown
san
jose.
C
A
big
concern
of
mine
is
the
unity
map
which,
to
the
best
of
my
understanding,
was
created
by
special
interest
groups
and
not
san
jose
residents.
To
the
best
of
my
knowledge,
they
are
not
truly
stakeholders
and
should
not
have
a
voice
in
this
process.
Redistricting
should
be
done
by
neighbors,
neighborhoods
and
communities
of
interest.
We
submitted
many
maps.
Why
is
there
a
map
up
front
and
center
being
discussed,
and
none
of
the
neighbors
or
neighborhood
maps
are
being
discussed?
C
What
do
residents
need
to
do
to
have
the
same
ability
and
the
same
attention
from
you
to
present
the
map
to
you,
the
commissioners,
that
these
special
interests
have
dissecting
day
three
and
removing
maidly
park
from
all
the
communities
that
we
have
worked
together
for
decades
makes
no
sense
whatsoever
when
you
are
discussing
communities
of
interest.
Thank
you
for
listening
to
my
comments
and
thank
you,
commissioners,
for
volunteering,
for
this
daunting
task.
A
A
Me
yes,
hi!
Thank
you
I'd
like
to
just
say
that
I
did
submit
some
written
testimony,
but
just
wanted
to
ask
you
to
for
two
things,
and
that
would
be
just
to
one
to
see
if
you
can
look
into
combining
north
san
jose
with
either
the
downtown
or
the
rose
garden
area,
as
opposed
to
the
berryessa
area
and
now
in
terms
of
just
looking
into
seeing,
if
that
would
do
a
better
population
balance
and
to
keep
the
barrier
neighborhood
together.
K
Yeah,
thank
you
good
evening.
My
name
is
louis
rocha
and
I'm
a
60-year
resident
of
district
8
and
what
is
now
district
8
in
san
jose,
and
I
want
to
unequivocally
support
the
unity
map
and
I'd
like
to
make
clear
that
this
map
is
a
reflection
of
many
long-time
residents
such
as
myself,
that
have
not
had
a
voice
in
the
process,
those
that
have
known
san
jose
in
the
history
of
the
county.
K
There
have
been
neglected
communities
of
color
in
this
valley
for
decades
for
generations,
so
the
unity
map
is
is
that
it
is
a
map
that
reflects
many
of
our
communal
interests,
and
so
I
just
want
to
add
that
no
matter
what
we
look
like
or
where
we
come
from
when
it
comes
to
having
a
say
over
who
represents
us
most
of
us
want
similar
things.
So
you
can
put
aside
that
trying
to
tear
down
what
group
is
speaking
here
or
what
who
has
a
place
here
or
not.
K
We
all
do-
and
I
want
to
thank
all
of
your
commissioners
for
your
hard
work,
because
that
there's
a
problem
too
much
of
people
that
volunteer
being
you
know
their
their
their
qualifications
and
all
this
being
checked.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
stepping
up
and
also
I
just
want
to
reiterate
that
by
joining
together
to
speak
out
for
fair
district
being,
we
can
deliver
on
what
all
of
our
schools
and
families
need
for
a
decade
to
come.
K
E
Hello,
this
is
gabriella
with
the
asian
law
lines
and
I'm
calling
to
support
the
unity
map
map
c4.
This
map
maintains
our
two
majority
minority
asian
districts,
as
well
as
our
one
majority
minority
latinx
district.
This
map
ensures
that
we
keep
our
important
communities
together,
such
as
the
berryessa
area,
the
penitentiary
creek
area
and
the
alamo
corridor.
These
lines
also
take
into
account
our
communities
of
interest
for
the
multi-family
housing
communities
along
highway
85,
which
has
been
previously
divided
under
previous
district
lines.
This
map
to
me
also
does
the
best
way
of
drawing
downtown.
E
It
brings
together
communities
of
interest
in
the
downtown
corn
downtown
west
to
help
account
for
the
growing
number
of
residents,
especially
given
the
new
developments
planned.
The
map
also
keeps
together
the
eastern
downtown
core
and
together
keeping
together
important
landmarks,
such
as
the
minetta
san
jose
airport
city
hall
and
san
jose
state,
which
has
been
mentioned
a
few
times
already.
E
It's
important
to
keep
san
jose
state
together
and
seaford
does
the
best
way
of
accounting
for
the
different
landmarks
that
do
exist
in
downtown
the
mean
the
unity
map
has
been
a
collaborative
process
which
takes
into
account
our
different
communities
of
interest
best
represent
our
renters,
our
ethnic
and
our
cultural
minorities.
Thank
you
for
listening.
C
A
A
E
P
Hi
yeah,
this
is
sharon.
I
live
in
negley
park
in
downtown
san
jose.
I've
lived
in
this
area
here
for
20
years,
and
I've
been
much
much
longer
than
that
in
san
jose
and
a
couple
pieces
of
things
that
I
want
to
point
out
on
the
three
new
maps
that
were
put
on
there's
a
two
and
a
three.
They
look
exactly
identical
to
me.
I
don't
see
any
difference
and
I
don't
know
why
it's
like
that
on
the
website.
P
The
thing
I
want
to
point
out
is,
I
don't
understand:
why
did
you
dig
out
over
on
capital
and
alum
rock
and
carve
out
pieces
and
then
pull
that
from
downtown
four
miles
away?
This
just
looks
like
a
very
contrived
map
and
then,
when
I
look
at
the
c4
map,
the
c4
map
is
almost
is
not
compact
at
all
which
it's
supposed
to
be,
and
it's
almost
incongruent.
It
basically
just
has
a
little
sliver
of
a
piece
cutting
across
luna
park
over
to
bayshore.
P
So
that's
not
even,
in
my
opinion,
a
legal
map
on
there,
and
the
other
thing
I
want
to
point
out
is
that
all
the
community
interest
statements
that
were
initially
put
in
there's
about
10
of
them,
they're
all
from
basically
all
from
non-profits,
almost
every
single
one
of
them
and
one
of
them's
even
got
a
script
in
here
that
says
good
afternoon,
blah
blah
blah.
My
name
is
blank.
P
They
forgot
to
fill
in
the
blank
I
mean
this
is
just
a
contrived
statement
from
nonprofit
groups
giving
scripts
and
the
people
don't
even
fill
in
the
blank
for
their
name
on
here.
So
I
just
the
whole
tone
of
this
is
not
good.
I
don't
like
the
you
know
and
the
fact
that
why
is
the
map
the
unity
map?
We
submitted
all
kinds
of
maps
in
the
last
few
days.
P
Why
is
the
unity
map
also
all
of
a
sudden,
the
one
that
the
commission
is
making
a
big
deal
about
here,
and
so
I
think
the
residents
need
to
be
heard
from,
and
I
don't
think
special
interests
like
nonprofits.
I
should
have
such
a
high
point
of
this
just
like.
I
wouldn't
think
that
developers
should
come
in
and
have
such
a
big
statement
in
what
goes
on
in
the
city.
P
G
O
Hi
I'm
gina
gates-lopez.
I
am
a
resident
of
district
3
in
the
bonita
area.
I
am
in
total
support
of
the
unity
map.
I
do
work
in
the
community
and
these
community
groups.
I
really
want
to
stress
that
these
are
folks
with,
with
their
boots
on
the
ground,
helping
neighbors,
helping
very
likely
your
neighbors,
who
don't
dare
go
to
the
to
you
to
say,
hey,
I
need
some
food.
I
need
some
protection.
O
O
You
do
that
work
because
it's
work
from
the
heart
so
with
that
being
said,
I'd
like
to
also
add
I'm
also
a
homeowner
in
an
area
that
has
a
lot
of
cars
and
a
lot
of
multiple
families,
and
you
know
we
need
to
be
able
to
work
out
a
solution
together.
We
know
what's
going
on
and
see
when
issues
happen
like
there's
flooding
in
the
street,
that
doesn't
happen
to
where
we
live,
because
we
have
a
different
infrastructure,
but
our
groups
that
live
here
are
people
that
live
here.
O
We
understand
that
these
people
that
work
with
non-prof
that
are
at
nonprofits
they
understand
because
they
also
listen
to
that
those
groups,
these
family
members
and
residents.
So
again,
I
encourage
you
to
look
at
the
unity
map
and
my
dear
neighbors,
please
be
considerate
and
just
be
open-minded
and
understand
these
non-profits
they're
us
they're
people
like
me
that
serve
the
community
and
we
have
listened,
and
they
have
listened
to
me.
It's
a
good
idea.
Please
support
the
unity
member.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you.
So
my
name
is
kristen
struby,
I'm
a
resident
of
district
3.
tonight.
I've
heard
a
lot
of
criticism
in
regards
to
the
unity
map.
To
be
honest,
I
I
just
got
a
chance
to
look
at
it
during
this
meeting,
because
I
was
unable
I
was
unable
to
successfully
navigate
the
website,
so
I
have
another
piece
of
feedback
for
that
as
well.
But,
as
the
last
speaker
just
said,
you
know
I'd
like
to
echo
that
these
community
groups
are
not
large
corporations
and
special
interests.
E
The
other
piece
of
feedback
that
I
wanted
to
give
was
in
regards
to
the
information
that's
being
provided.
You
know
I
looked
around
on
the
city's
website
for
quite
some
time
to
try
to
engage
with
these
maps
and
it
took
me
a
really
long
time
to
figure
out.
They
were
on
the
agenda
and
not
posted
on
the
city's
website.
E
Also,
some
of
the
maps
are
very
low
resolution,
so
it's
really
difficult
to
see
exactly
where
boundaries
are
and
what
schools
are
included.
What
neighborhoods
are
included.
You
don't
have
that
nice
map
that
we
saw
today
with
the
presentation
that
has
all
the
neighborhood
boundaries
there
and
that
would
be
really
helpful.
G
C
C
You
can
draw
and
submit
your
own
maps
as
well
using
this
link
and
then
all
of
the
the
draft
plans
that
have
been
attached
to
our
agenda
today
are
being
uploaded
to
the
website
as
well
as
well
as
the
letters
from
the
public.
So
you
don't
have
to
go
to
an
agenda
to
see
these
these
submitted
drafts
or
to
see
the
letters
from
the
public
and
again
you've
got
the
link
right
here
to
go
to
district
r
and
to
draw
and
submit
your
own
maps.
I
just
wanted
people
to
be
aware.
C
G
I
G
I
So
it's
a
is
a
great
way
to
see
the
boundary
lines
between
districts
and
to
you
know,
tinker
and
with
with
the
maps,
and
that's
really
our
our
fix,
because
districtor
isn't
able
to
kind
of
ingest
these
just
these
plans
that
were
the
draft
plans
in
a
timely
manner
that
we've
created
these
html
web
maps
of
each
of
the
of
the
lines.
So
you
can
get
to
that
clarity
of
zooming
in
to
like
the
street
view.
G
Okay,
thank
you
and
we
did
get
some
quite
a
bit
of
public
comment
on
the
unity
map.
I
would
propose
that,
since
we
are
going
to
be
having
a
presentation
next
week
on
the
unity
map
that
perhaps
we
defer
substantive
discussion
on
that
portion
for
next
week,
but
any
further
discussions
or
recommendations
for
chris
tonight,
please
feel
free
commissioners
to
raise
your
hand,
commissioner
vadim.
L
I
L
I
You
can
see
that
negli
university,
I
believe
most
of
the
san
jose
state
area
is
bounded
in
district
three
in
the
c3
map
and
then,
if
you
look
at
the
unity
map,
sorry
I
think
I
didn't
both
on
and
the
unity
map
does
the
same
thing.
It
includes
most
of
the
university
and
then
it
it
doesn't
use
the
680
as
the
southern
border.
It
goes
into
virginia
and
martha
in
guadalupe
includes
that
in
d3.
So
you
can
see
a
better
construction.
F
Yeah
thanks.
I
know
you
want
to
defer
comment
on
c4,
but
I
feel
like
I
need
to
say
something
because
I
don't
want
to
have
a
presentation
that
wastes
everybody's
time
because,
as
currently
constructed,
I
appreciate
why
certain
things
were
done
and
certain
aspects
I'm
just
going
to
speak
about
d6,
because
that's
who
I
represent
certain
aspects
of
this
make
a
complete
non-starter.
I
mean
pushing
d9
all
the
way
at
pine.
Taking
willow,
glen
high
school
out
of
d6
makes
no
sense,
keeping
canoa
gardens
in
a
peninsula.
F
F
It
ignores
the
written
correspondence
we
received
from
the
willow,
glen
neighborhood
association,
so
there's
just
no
way
based
on
what
we've
heard,
at
least
from
my
constituents
in
my
district,
that
I
could
ever
support
this,
and
not
only
would
I
not
support
it
as
currently
constructed.
I
would
strongly
advocate
against
it.
So
I
just
feel,
like
I
respect
the
people
who
put
the
time
in
and
why
they've
done
what
they've
done
and
I'm
more
than
willing
to
listen
to
their
presentation.
J
I
wanted
to
thank
the
public
for
making
the
comments
that
they
have
tonight,
because
I
also
concur
with
keeping
san
jose
state
whole
that
community
being
part
of
downtown
in
regards
to
the
unimap.
I
will
keep
my
comments
brief.
That
is
the
c4
map,
in
which
I
do
appreciate
how
it
keeps
what
is
currently
known
as
district
10
together
geographically,
but
I
do
understand
that
there
will
be,
as
my
fellow
commissioner
had
mentioned,
concerns
about
some
of
the
current
lines
as
depicted.
J
So
I
do
look
forward
to
next
week's
presentation
about
that
particular
map.
And,
finally
again,
I
want
to
urge
more
outreach
to
the
community
to
know
that
this
very
important
process
is
happening
because
it
does
impact
the
future
of
san
jose,
in
fact,
so
that
the
city
was
promoting
the
county's
redistricting
process,
but
not
the
cities.
So
that
does
concern
me,
especially
with
the
magnitude
of
what
this
redistricting
process
may
result
in.
So
those
are
my
comments.
Thank
you.
G
Thank
you,
chris.
Just
a
few
more
comments
from
me
one.
I
would
like
to
see,
I
think,
two
more
lines
on
either
draft
plan
c3
or
c2,
where
we
can
keep
downtown
together
as
as
much
as
possible
as
close
to
what
it
is
now
consistent
with
the
public
comment
that
we've
heard,
and
I
wonder
if,
if
like
in
my
mind
the
way
I'm
thinking
about
it
and
I'm
sure
you
have
a
better
way
of
thinking
about
it.
G
But
in
my
mind
it
seems
that
101
might
be
the
place
where
we
draw
the
easternmost
line
of
district
3.,
and
what
I
realize
is
going
to
happen
is
that
that's
probably
going
to
impact
district
five
district
five
will
have
to
move
up
a
little
bit
and
based
on
population
that
part
of
district
four
might
need
to
come
into
that
new
district.
Five
and.
I
I
I
I
I
Yeah,
I
think
right
now,
district
three
as
it's
in
this
plan,
as
it's
being
shown,
is
already
dv,
is
already
under
deviation
by
1.3
or
1360
people.
So
if
three
got,
if
three
gets
smaller
or
if
three
loses
kind
of
this
area
and
this
area
and
d5
comes
up,
it's
gonna
need
to
gain
population,
and
the
only
I
mean
I
guess
it
could
go
north.
I
don't
think
that
you
want.
I
don't,
but
there
is
not
a
lot
of
population
here.
You
have
to
go
much
farther
north
to
do
that.
I
G
I
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think
what
would
have
to
happen
if,
if
five
moves
up
right,
then
four
would
take
part
of
f
of
three
and
then
three
would
come
down
and
take
some
of
seven
or
four
or
six,
because
you
always
have
to
it's
a
zero-sum
game.
In
a
lot
of
respects,
you
can
play
with
the
deviations,
so
we
could
make
district
three
smaller
and
test
that
outer
bound
of
the
ten
percent
total
deviation
like
we
could
bring
it
in
this
construction.
I
I
think
we
could
bring
it
to
like,
maybe
negative.
Another
15
like
4
000
people
could
be
moved
into
a
different
district
and
you'd
be
around
five
percent
under
population.
That's
something
we
could
we
could
look
to
and
for
the
problem
is
right
now.
District
four
is
overpopulated
because
we're
really
trying
to
keep
evergreen
and
a
lot
of
the
neighborhoods
intact.
I
G
K
M
I
I
I
G
G
We'll
move
on
to
the
next
item
on
our
agenda,
which
is
old
business.
Oh
there's
none!
So
we
can
move
on
item
seven
new
business.
We
don't
have
any
new
business
item.
Eight
public
comment
open
forum.
This
is
the
time
for
public
comment
on
items
that
are
not
on
the
agenda.
The
brown
act
prohibits
the
commission
from
discussing
any
item
that
is
not
agendized.
A
A
Does
an
okay
job
with
the
libraries.
The
librarians
are
terrible,
but
you're
able
to
at
least
get
books
in
the
library,
but
yeah
the
cities
just
run
really
really
bad,
and
I
don't
I
I
don't
enough.
People
don't
complain
about
it,
everyone's
very,
very
complacent
too
nice
too
polite
and
I'm
not.
I
really
think
that
what
these
road
diets
that
are
going
on
in
district
9,
pam
foley's
district
are
really
stupid.
You're
going
to
make
hillsdale
two
lanes
on
each
side
creating
more
and
more
traffic.
A
The
city
thinks
that
they're
going
to
get
you
know,
get
rid
of
carbon
emissions
because
of
getting
rid
of
parking
here
in
the
downtown
totally
stupid.
They
they
have
this
environmental
bent.
When
it's
a
city,
the
city
needs
to
focus
on
local
issues,
it's
not
about
carbon
credits
and
cars
and
everything
else
they
need
to
make
it.
So
it's
easy
to
drive
easy
to
park.
I
don't
get
it.
It's
like
a
student
union
with
trying
to
find
some
sort
of
utopia,
some
kind
of
fantasy
utopia.
A
B
Yes,
I'm
hoping
this
isn't
out
of
line.
I
was
just
trying
to
ask
a
question,
those
of
us
with
hearing
loss,
I'm
able
to
follow
in
the
closed
captionings
fairly
well,
but
if
a
transcript
can
be
made
available
of
meetings
that
you
can
download
many
webinar
formats,
don't
allow
that
zoom's
one
of
them.
That
would
be
very
useful
for
people
like
me,
but
I
also
missed
how
to
access
the
html
maps.
That
seemed
exceedingly
useful,
and
I
thought
others,
along
with
myself,
might
want
to
know
how
to
access
those.
C
B
P
If
I
go
on
either
link
to
them,
they're,
identical
maps
and
then
there's
the
c4,
I
cannot
find
the
c3,
it
doesn't
seem
to
be
posted
anywhere
and
I'm
wondering
if
anybody
else
has
the
same
problem.
I've
tried
it
several
times
on
the
regular
web
page
and
on
the
agenda
webpage.
The
html
and
the
pdf
for
the
c2s
and
the
c3s
are
identical.
I
don't
think
the
c3
is
up
there.
P
Maybe
somebody
else
sees
them,
but
I
don't
so
I'm
hoping
somebody
could
help
sort
that
out
and
the
other
thing
is
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
for
next
week.
It
looks
like
somehow
the
unity
map
is
is
like
the
golden
child.
All
of
a
sudden
and
it's
gonna,
be
you
know,
presented
at
next
week's
meeting.
I
don't
know
if
it's
going
to
take
over
the
whole
meeting
or
what,
but
is
there
any
opportunity
to
get
any
other
maps
of
interest
that
people
might
want
to
have
discussed
at
next
meeting?
Thank
you.
C
Although
this
isn't
a
question
and
answer
period,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
answer
that
anybody
who
has
submitted
a
draft
map
has
the
opportunity
to
present
it
to
the
commission
and
we'll
do
it
during
public
comment.
So
if
you
submit
a
map
in
the
next
week-
and
you
would
like
to
talk
about
your
map,
you
can
do
that
and
we
can
even
get
you
the
ability
to
share
your
screen
to
point
out
the
map
that
you're
looking
at
next
speaker
is
blair
beekman,
followed
by
gina
gates.
H
Blair
beekman,
thank
you
for
the
meeting
today.
I
wanted
to
quickly
offer
that
I
offered
some
public
comment
at
a
neighborhood
services
and
education
committee
meeting
today
I
made
important
words:
it's
a
final
open
forum
that
were
important
to
myself
to
speak
about,
and
I
kind
of
bobbled
and
muffed
a
few
of
my
final
words,
and
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that.
I
use
the
words
as
I
think
we
are
learning.
H
So
if
you
hear,
if
you
listen
to
it-
and
it
sounds
a
little
bit
muffled-
hopefully
you
won't
hear
it,
but
if
it
does
sound
a
little
a
bit
muffled,
I
meant
to
say,
as
I
think
we
are
learning
and
thanks.
That's
all
I'll
say
about
that
for
now.
Yeah.
Thank
you
for
this
meeting
tonight.
The
person
who
spoke
about
district
five
issues
and
the
ocala
area
and
and
wanting
to
be
more
a
part
of
district
five,
as
opposed
to
district
seven.
H
I
think
that's
a
real
old
issue
that
I
hope
you
can
look
into.
I
have
the
I
have
the
same
feelings
and
I've
just
had
that
same
feeling
as
her
for
a
long
time,
and
so
thank
you.
If
you
could
look
into
that.
When
I
talked
about
the
issues
of
living
by
santa
clara,
you
know
it
seems,
like
you
know,
living
on
the
alameda
along
with
district
six.
H
It's
always
been
a
nagging
question
shouldn't
that,
couldn't
that
be
district,
one
area
to
to
consider
and
my
ideas
about
splitting
up
the
districts
a
bit
more,
that's
going
on
at
the
charter
process
at
this
time,
maybe
it
can
be.
I
don't
know
if
we're
not
going
to
do
that
now.
We
can
just
consider
it
in
in
how
you're
making
decisions
at
this
time,
and
maybe
it
can
help.
I
really
like
the
east-west
idea
of
of
item
c3,
putting
d3
into
the
east
side
bringing
d5
into
the
west
side
and
downtown
area.
O
First
of
all,
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you,
everybody,
because
things
don't
get
done
in
this
city
without
us
stepping
forward
and
doing
the
work
and
that
this
is
directed
to
the
first
person
who
really
had
a
lot
of
complaints
about
this
city
that
I
love
and
I
think
a
lot
of
you
love
too,
because
you
wouldn't
be
here
and
serving
if
you
don't
like
it.
So
much.
Thank
you.
O
You
know
it
doesn't
sound
like
you
contribute
in
any
way
with
any
commission
with
any
counsel
or
invest
your
time
into
making
the
difference
that
you
feel
needs
to
happen.
I
encourage
you
to
please
step
forward
because
you
know
we
hold
dog,
we
get
hired.
You
know
we
want
some
other
people,
some
new
blood,
so
I
encourage
you
get
in,
but
you
know
stop
your
complaining
seriously.
O
I'd
like
to
also
share
that
or
ask.
Are
you
doing
any
outreach
where
this
these
same
presentations
are
available
concurrently
in
spanish
and
vietnamese,
because
you
know
the
big
populations
and
they
are
you
know,
esl,
learners
or
or
english
is
not
their
primary
language.
So
that's
important.
That's
my
question
second
thing.
O
I
want
to
say,
is
our
community
which
we
we
live
in
the
old,
the
old
little
cheese
factory
used
to
be
along
the
101,
so
our
group,
we
started
a
group
called
parking
stink
and
I
think
that
that
resonates
in
a
lot
of
places.
I
don't
know
where
this
belongs,
but
as
far
as
development
goes,
we
really
need
to
be
very,
very
careful
because
over
in
our
neck
of
the
woods
we
have
multi-generational
homes
and
these
people
work
and
they
need
to
be
able
to
park
their
cars.
B
C
Hi,
I
I
I
wasn't
planning
to
speak,
but
then
someone
had
actually
mentioned
about
how
they
also
felt
like
ocala
would
be
best.
You
know
represented
in
district
five,
because
I've
always
felt
like
a
distinguished
distinguishing
landmark
is
cunningham
lake
and
cunningham
lake
really
does
divide
the
neighborhoods
like
in
my
neighborhood.
When
I
walk
out
the
door,
I
see
the
hillview
airport,
their
neighbor
view
they
they
neighborhood,
they
see
a
mercedes-benz
dealership.
So
I
wanted
to
thank
the
person
I
kind
of
I
really
feel
like
they
validated.
C
G
Thank
you
for
for
those
comments.
Moving
on
to
item
nine
meeting
schedule,
the
next
meeting
we
have
is
next
thursday
october
21st
at
seven
o'clock
p.m.
And
again
our
priority
will
be
to
discuss
iterations
of
the
draft
maps
and
also
hear
from
the
folks
at
rising
about
the
unity
map
again
we'll
be
meeting
weekly
for
the
next
several
weeks
until
this
process
is
completed
next
item
nine
adjournment,
okay
and
the
meeting
of
the
redistricting
commission
is
now
adjourned.
Good
night,
everybody.