►
Description
City of San José, California
Joint meeting of Rules and Open Government / Committee of the Whole, September 28, 2022
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be held at San José City Hall and also accessible via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=1001181&GUID=B90A4A26-6BDE-4F45-A80A-E50253C5BE0C
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
The
Joint
mean,
and
the
rules
and
open
government
committee
and
Committee
of
the
whole
to
order
can
we
have
a
roll
call.
Please.
A
C
Hi
Claire
Beekman
here
sorry
for
a
bit
of
a
meltdown
I
had
yesterday,
hopefully
I
can
make
it
up
a
bit
today.
I
have
an
apology
ready
to
go
written
out
so
sorry
again
to
offer
you
will
be
talking
about
future
of
giving
more
power
to
San
Jose
Community
energy
leaders
about
emergency
practices.
I
think
is
something
around
those
terms
and
I.
C
Just
that's
on
one
of
the
items
the
agenda
items
next
week
and
I
just
wanted
to
ask
the
question.
C
I'm
trying
to
learn
is
you
know:
I
I
talked
earlier
in
the
year
the
importance
of
a
local
procurement
practices,
it's
a
future
of
renewable
energy
ideas
that
could
be
really
vital,
for
you
know
just
our
future
sustainability
as
Community
practices
and
also
how
to
more
quickly
I
think
leave
an
era
of
if
there
is
a
natural
disaster.
C
It
helps
us
rebuild
Faster
by
by
having
local
procurement
processes
in
place,
and
you
know
from
all
of
those
structuring
and
figuring
of
good
practices
hold
on
a
sec
from
all
of
the
good
practices.
I
I
I'm
still
not
fully
sure
exactly
with
the
renewable
process.
How
much
are
we
going
to
be
relying
on
fossil
fuels
at
this
time
and
compared
to
the
future
I
know,
California
has
created
our
North.
C
The
Bay
Area
has
created
a
really
great
way
to
limit
how
fossil
fuels
can
be
used
in
the
future
of
renewable
energy
ideas,
which
is
an
awesome
start
and
I'm
just
wondering
if
you
guys
can
make
that
more
clear
in
your
public
meetings.
What
exactly
renewable
energy
will
be
relying
on
in
terms
of
fossil
fuels
and
local
procurement
in
the
future?
Thank
you.
A
D
A
D
B
Thank
you
and
before
I
entertain
a
motion.
I
gotta
ask
Angel
my
usual
load
balancing
question
for
this
agenda
is:
has
this
agenda
been
load
balanced.
E
I
know
Lee's
not
here,
I
was
going
to
ask
a
similar
question,
but
sort
of
probably
the
opposite
of
what
vice
mayor
usually
asks.
We
have
we're
deferring
a
couple
items
off
this
agenda.
It
seems
like
a
really
really
short
agenda
and
I'm
just
getting
concerned
that
we're
not
putting
enough
on
these
agendas
and
well.
B
E
E
F
This
this
one
is
unusually
short,
I.
Think
when
you
look
at
the
Horizon
report,
I
think
that'll
kind
of
take
care
of
that
issue,
that
we
got
some
media
issues
coming
down
down
the
road
here,
but
there's
nothing.
You
know
time
sensitive
or
nothing
at
the
moment
that
we
could
add
at
this
point
unless
there
was
something
that
you
wanted
specifically
at.
B
Thank
you,
I
will
entertain
a
motion
and
there's
a
sun
edgy
as
well
vice
mayor.
G
I
have
a
question:
first,
yes,
go
ahead
and
Angel.
This
is
kind
of
along
those
same
lines.
I've
noticed
that
the
law
e
item
8.1
is
is
a
recommended
deferral,
and
this
is
an
item
that
we
had
expected
to
have
finalized
along
ago.
So
I
was
wondering
I
see
the
recommended
deferrals
to
1018,
which
is
our
our
next
meeting
after
October
4th.
But
what
is
the
likelihood
that
we
will
finally
be
able
to
put
this
one
to
bed.
F
Yeah
I'm
going
to
ask
staff
to
to
address
that
timeline
issue
because
I
know
that
that'd
be
Rosalind
or
Jackie.
G
H
A
H
And
I
think.
G
H
A
little
bit
more
time
before
getting
it
to
council
final
action,
okay
and
I
believe
we
have.
G
Good
good
to
know,
thank
you.
I
will
move
approval
of
the
agenda
as
well
as
the
add
sheet.
E
B
All
right,
we
don't
have
meeting
on
the
11th,
so
we're
on
to
the
consent,
calendar
and
we'll
go
to
public
comments.
A
C
Hi
Blair
here,
as
vice
mayor
Jones,
as
I'm
understanding,
is
traveling
to
Washington
DC.
Today,
I'm
one
of
the
Zen
calendar
items
to
attend
lectures
with
African-American
and
Global,
and
the
global
black
community.
This
week,
I
would
like
to
apologize
as
much
as
I
can
to
vice
mayor
Jones
and
the
city
government
staff
and
the
events
of
public
comments
of
city
council
agenda
item
3.5.
Yesterday
upon
thought
and
reflection,
my
tone
was
a
bit
strong.
C
I
understand
that
from
this,
why
City
SDA
city
government
may
have
then
cut
off
this
level
of
public
comment:
a
city
budget
manager,
Jim
Shannon
in
his
staff
presentation
of
city
of
council
agenda
item
2.5
discussed
how
people
can
practice
Equity
within
inter-government
departments,
and
the
city
council
did
not
follow
some
correct
procedures
in
approving
the
consent
calendar
as
a
whole.
Without
first
asking
for
public
comment
yesterday,
I
felt
we
could
all
make
this
up
by
simply
adding
a
few
words
of
public
comment
from
item
2.14
to
item
3.5
2.14
was
about
items.
C
C
It
is
a
public
meeting
practice
I
feel
we've
done
together
somewhat
often
in
my
seven
plus
years
of
San
Jose
Public
comment.
Unfortunately,
at
item
3.14
public
comment
in
our
3.5
public
comment.
In
my
usual
sad
remedial
and
Opus
ways,
I
asked
if
I
could
speak
to
item
2.4
instead
of
the
proper
title
of
2.14.
This,
along
with
other
possible
factors
invited
with
the
vice
mayor
to
say
no
to
my
request.
I
simply
said:
I
would
proceed
and
for
yourselves
to
be
the
judge
of
my
words
to
follow.
C
To
be
honest,
and
it
was
my
tone
that
may
have
been
uncomfortable
to
city
government
staff,
who
then
cut
me
off
and
for
this
I
understand,
except
the
consequences
of
their
actions
of
this
moment.
So
again,
I
apologize
to
vice
mayor
Jones
and
the
city
government.
B
Hi
can
I
entertain
a
motion
for
to
move
the
consent.
Calendar,
please
so
I
moved.
Second,
let's
move
the
second
Tony.
B
Next
item
is
actions
related
to
RVs
in
the
city
of
San
Jose
and
before
we
go
to
the
committee,
I
want
to
see
three
or
three
public
comments
on
this
item.
C
Hi,
we're
Beekman
good
luck
to
save
parking
ideas
for
this
item
and
in
the
future,
if
needed.
The
first
woman
who
spoke
today,
maybe
her
item
can
be
placed
within
Community
energy
practices
of
that
agenda
and
thank
you
for
allowing
her
extra
time
at
open
Forum
to
speak
on
this
item
as
well.
C
J
Hi
so
we're
talking
about
this
RV
parking
that
the
council
people,
council
members,
did
a
memorandum
letter.
J
Okay,
well,
you
know:
I
just
came
back
from
the
RV
site
at
the
Ballpark
I,
can't
even
comprehend
why
they
are
being
abated
right
now
and
they
have
only
two
weeks
to
move.
Why
is
this
happening
now?
Why
is
this
letter
for
all
the
RVs
coming
to
rules
and
it's
going
to
the
city?
J
I
mean
I've
spoken
over
and
over
and
over
again
to
think
about
what
you're
doing
and
nobody
is.
These
people
have
no
place
to
go.
I
I,
don't
understand
why
nobody
gets
this
I
really
don't
I
mean
you're,
saying
people
have
the
right
to
live
in
RVs,
and
this
is
not
happening
right
now.
They
are
buying
some
RVs,
that's
the
ones
they're
buying.
Let's
take
them
out
of
there
and
there'll
be
less
people.
The
people
who
live
there
don't
want
all
the
RVs
there.
J
J
They
have
no
place
to
go
and
I
think
the
city
council
needs
to
step
up
and
you're,
not
you're,
not
stepping
up
you
care
more
about
taking
people
out
of
their
homes
or
out
of
the
area
and
putting
them
on
the
streets
and
that's
what
you're
doing
I
I
just
don't
understand
why
nobody
understands
that.
You
know
I
know
councilwoman
Davis
what
she
wants,
but
these
are
human
beings
and
they're
going
to
be
disgraced
and
they're
going
to
go
back
on
their
streets.
B
Thank
you
I
know
that
a
early
consideration
response
form
was
submitted
for
for
this
item,
so
I'm
going
to
ask
staff
to
speak
to
it.
Please.
F
Okay,
yeah
vice
mayor
council
members,
there
are
two
memos
and
and
two
corresponding
early
consideration
response
form
the
first
memo
from
vice
mayor,
Chuck,
Jones,
council
members,
Foley,
Jimenez
and
Mahan.
F
What
we
basically
capture
in
this
early
consideration
response
form
is
green
lighting,
recommendation
number
one
which
is
directing
the
administration
to
explore
cost
and
strategy
required
to
conduct
the
comprehensive
count
and
inquiry
of
RVs
throughout
the
city
of
San
Jose
to
gain
a
deeper
understanding.
So
basically
green
lighting
recommendation
number
one
and
we
are
asking
for
more
time
at
least
three
to
four
weeks
to
come
back
as
we
to
address
items
two
through
five.
As
part
of
that
evaluation
and
exploration.
That's
our
recommendation
for
that
memo.
F
There
is
also
a
second
Memo
by
council
member
Cohen.
We
are
green
lighting.
We
are
recommending
green
lighting
both
of
those
recommendations.
The
first
one
there's
already
Council
direction
that
we've
received
back
in
May
to
explore
this
and
we're
supposed
to
come
back
by
late
November,
and
so
we
could
fold
this
additional
language
into
that
direction
and
that
work,
and
so
we
are
recommending
green
lighting
that
and
then
the
second.
F
We
are
we're
actually
piloting
a
a
program
that
reads
almost
identical
to
this
and
and
as
such,
feel
that
we
could
green
light
that
and
and
include
those
pilot
results
when
we
get
back
to
council
and
so
that's
a
staff
recommendation.
We
also
have
staff
here
available
for
more
detailed
questions,
but
that's
our
recommendation
for
now.
B
Thank
you
Angel,
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
speak
to
the
member
that
I
prepared
with
councilmember
Foley,
Jimenez
and
Mayhem,
and-
and
that
is
that
in
my
district
and
you
know
throughout
the
city,
you
know
there,
we've
had
these
issues
with
RVs
being
parked,
particularly
in
neighborhood
streets,
and
it's
not
safe
for
the
the
residents
in
the
neighborhood
is
not
safe
for
the
inhabitants
of
the
RVs
and
it's
not
sustainable.
That's
why
we
wanted
to
explore
better
options
and
I
can
give
you
a
a
good
example.
B
On
Friday
of
last
week,
I
had
an
opportunity
to
be
up
in
San,
Francisco,
doing
a
site
visit
for
an
RV
parking
facility
in
near
Hunter's
Point,
and
it
was
well
managed
the
res
there
were
approximately
45
RVs
that
were
there,
some
were
operable
and
some
weren't
they
had
sanitation,
they
had
security
and
the
residents
seem
to
be
in
a
good
place
in
terms
of
being
able
to
have
a
place
to
sleep,
have
access
to
again
services
and
sanitation,
and
it
cleared
out
actually
a
street
that
was
severely
impacted
by
multiple
RVs
that
were
parked
on
that
street.
B
So
that's
that
was
a
firsthand
example
of
of
a
solution
that
works
for
both
the
residents,
as
well
as
the
RV
inhabitants.
We
want.
We
need
to
do
additional
research,
we
need
to
understand.
You
know
the
needs
of
of
the
folks
that
are
living
in
these
RVs
and
also,
as
you
know,
what
Gail
alluded
to.
We
need
to
find
a
place
for
them
to
go.
That's
going
to
work
for
them
as
well,
work
work
for
the
community
and
our
neighbors.
B
So
that's
why
we
put
out
this
memo
and
I
know:
council,
member
Cohen,
you
had
additional
memo
that
you
could
speak
to.
E
E
This
is
an
important
thing
and
I
I'm
not
I'm,
not
certainly
it's
not
unique
to
District
4,
but
your
District
4
has
a
I
believe
a
particularly
acute
problem
in
parts
of
the
district.
I'm
sure
other
districts
have
areas
that
are
like
that
too
I
I'm,
actually
gonna.
If
I
share
my
screen
does
that
gets
shared
on
the
Chamber
of
video,
okay,
I'm
gonna
I'm
gonna
share
a
video
just
because
I
think.
A
E
There's
the
audio
there's
no
idea
on
this
one.
It's
just
a
video
is
that
showing
up?
Oh
there,
you
go
okay,
so
so,
just
as
an
example,
so
what
happened
and
this
we
we
know
that
there's
issues
like
vice
mayor
mentioned
about
res
Vehicles,
parked
in
residential
neighborhoods,
which
are
unsafe
for
both
parties
and
what's
happening.
Of
course,
is
we
often
do
react
to
the
residential
ones,
and
we
have.
We
have
some
of
those
in
our
district.
E
But
what's
ended
up
happening
is
there's
a
large,
a
large
clustering
of
RVs
in
some
of
our
business
districts,
and
it
was
a
concern
for
some
of
our
businesses
in
North,
San
Jose
that
we've
been
working
with
for
the
last
month
and
I
took
a
video
along
a
Street
in
North
San
Jose
called
Cruise
drive,
there's
over
there's
about
25
RVs
parked
in
this
two
block
stretch,
so
I'm,
just
kind
of
sharing
video
of
all
of
the
RVs
parked
along
this
straight.
E
The
stretch
here,
the
companies
behind
it
which
are
in
this
video
right
now,
are
concerned
about
it.
They
can't
invite
their
their
clients
and
customers
to
their
site
at
the
end
of
the
street
is
a
fuel
Depot.
You
can
see
a
gas
truck
driving
out
they're
coming
through
about
one
truck
every
five
minutes
out
of
that
gas,
Depot
and
vehicles
that
are
pulling
out
of
these
parking.
Lots
are
unable
to
see
what's
coming
down
the
street
with
gas
trucks
driving
down
the
street,
and
so
there
were
some
things
that
we
put
into
this.
E
E
We
we
need
to
have
rule
some
kind
of
rules
put
in
place
about
what
what
we,
what
we
can
enforce
as
far
as
keeping
communities
and
streets
safe,
so
I
wanted
to
have
that
element
in
there,
because
I
think
you
know
they
asked
us.
For
example,
can
we
have
sight
lines
preserved
for
people
pulling
out
of
the
parking
lot?
Can
we
can?
E
We
have
certain
places
that
certain
rules
that
we
can
enforce
in
place
to
make
sure
that
we're
safe
on
this
places
where
we
are
still
going
to
have
RV
parking
and
then
it
is
important
for
us
to
find
places
that
are
more
suited
than
a
street
like
this
or
residential
neighborhoods,
and
it
just
shows
the
acute
need.
This
is
one
Street
in
our
district
that
has
about
25
there's
another
one
across
the
way
on
Sealy
with
another
10.
E
there's
about
10
up
in
lb,
so
there's
there's
clusterings
that
are
happening
of
of
RVs
and
I
expect
it's
going
to
get
worse
after
Columbus
is
cleared
too.
Vehicles
are
going
to
find
some
of
these
sites
and
and
cluster
in
some
of
these
sites.
So
I
just
wanted
to
to
share
that,
and
that's
the
reason
for
our
number
one
recommendation.
The
number
two
recommendation
on
my
memo:
it's
based
on
our
experience
with
our
Vista
Montana
parking
site
last
year.
E
We
saw
that
the
folks
who
ended
up
on
that
site
couldn't
relocate
or
couldn't
take
other
housing
until
their
vehicles
were
repaired
and
and
many
of
the
repairs
weren't
very
expensive.
But
there
wasn't
really
a
mechanism
in
place
to
assist
them
and
so
I'm
glad
to
hear
that,
with
the
pilot
that
we're
doing,
we
might
be
able
to
to
operationalize
that
kind
of
a
program
to
help
people
get
their
vehicles
running.
E
In
a
couple
instances,
we
had
a
generous
member
of
my
staff
who
actually
gave
money
to
people
to
help
them
get
their
vehicles
fixed,
wasn't
a
lot,
but
that's
what
they
needed
and
they
did
that
and
they
were
able
to
drive
away.
But
without
that
we
would
have
had
a
problem
there
and
we,
you
know
we
need
to
be
able
to
to
offer
people
that
service
when
they
need.
It
I
think
so
that
those
are
the
two
items
that
I
added
to
this
I
think
the
other
items
are
important
as
well.
E
We
need
to
find
places
to
provide
the
services
that
people
need
and
to
to
be
able
to
park
safely
and
be
safe
for
both
the
residents
and
the
RVs
and
for
other
residents
and
other
people
who
work
in
San
Jose,
so
I,
I'm,
happy
I
mean
I
I.
Guess
the
question
would
be
for
staff.
E
F
I
think
we
could,
given
that
we
would
have
a
pilot
in
place.
That's
that's
in
progress.
We
could
we
could
real.
We
could
take
the
results
of
that
pilot
and
fold
it
into
our
recommendations
around
this
whole
issue
altogether.
We
do
see
that
as
as
being
one
of
the
key
strategies,
because
that's
you
know
even
whether
it's
the
the
folks
over
at
Columbus
or
or
in
these
other
streets,
that
you've
identified
we're
running
into
the
same
issue.
Sometimes
people
just
need
a
little
bit
of
help
to
just
you
know.
F
So
a
little
bit
of
help
can
go
a
long
way,
and
so
we've
identified
that
and
and
we're
going
to
operationalize
that
so
you
could
pretty
much
guarantee
that
it's
going
to
be
part
of
our
strategy
overall.
E
Okay,
so
I'm
happy
to
move
the
first,
both
memos,
I,
guess
and
and
let's
you
know,
you
figure
out
the
timing
for
how
that
can
get
implemented.
G
K
Good
afternoon,
Brian
Schmidt
for
green
Foothills
I
want
to
speak
in
support
of
the
memo
from
council
member
for
Menace
and
a
Cohen.
This
is
a
really
important
issue
that
should
go
to
council.
It
should
go
there
for
two
reasons:
one
General
and
one
specific
on
the
general
issue.
This
is
one
of
the
most
important
policy
issues
that
are
going
to
be
coming
to
the
city
council
over
the
next
eight
years.
This
is
guiding
housing
within
the
city
of
San
Jose.
K
It's
something
that
needs
to
be
discussed
at
the
level
of
the
city
council
and
if
you
look
at
other
city
councils
and
other
elected
bodies,
County
governments
throughout
the
state
they
are,
they
are
addressing
this.
It
should
be
addressed
within
the
city
of
San
Jose,
there's
also
a
specific
issue
to
San
Jose
regarding
protection
of
open
space
in
Coyote
Valley
and
resolving
conflicts
in
North,
San
Jose
every
other.
K
So
the
county
is
looking
for
an
opportunity
to
work
together
with
the
city.
This
could
be
done
by
resolving
conflicts
with
the
county
over
North,
San
Jose
and
taking
some
of
the
housing
obligations
away
from
the
away
from
the
county,
small
by
City
standards
huge
by
County
unincorporated
standards.
All
this
is
as
complicated
needs
to
be
discussed
at
the
council
level,
and
we
encourage
you
to
to
to
approve
this
memo.
Thank
you.
L
Thank
you,
I
am
Roma
Dawson
and
thanks
to
the
vice
mayor,
I
am
a
member
of
Housing
and
Community
Development
commission,
however,
I
want
to
be
certain.
You
realize
that
I'm
speaking
today
as
an
individual
and
not
on
behalf
of
the
commission,
I
listen
to
the
road
map,
discussion,
I'm,
also
part
of
an
organization.
That's
following
housing
elements
in
the
nine
counties
under
mtca
bag,
I
heard
what
the
mayor
said
and
yes,
we're
lagging
behind
other
cities.
L
L
L
A
M
Hi,
my
name
is
Emily
and
Ramos
I
am
speaking
on
behalf
of
Silicon
Valley
at
home.
We
believe
that
we're
in
support
of
the
memo
by
council,
member
Jimenez
and
Cohen.
This
is
an
important
opportunity
to
for
continued
engagement
on
the
housing
element.
The
housing
element
is
supposed
to
address
the
needs
of
the
community
and
and
come
together
with
solutions
to
our
housing
crisis.
M
It
is
an
open
and
collaborative
process
which
we
feel
that
council
is
a
very
important
part
of
that,
and
public
facilitation
encourages
more
public
engagement
and
the
we
anticipate
the
hcd
letter
arriving
around
mid-December,
which
gives
time
we
we
expect
that
this
this
council
meeting
or
study
session
would
be
in
in
January,
which
is
absolutely
appropriate,
since
we
also
have
new
it
it.
It's
a
timeline
that
actually
works
with
everyone.
M
So
throughout
the
county
there
have
been
issues
with
engaging
the
public
and
we
want
San
Jose,
even
though
staff
has
done
an
amazing
job
in
doing
Outreach
thus
far.
This
is
just
another
thing
that
we
think
is
an
important
opportunity
for
the
community
to
engage
collaborate
and
work
together
as
we
solve
our
housing
crisis.
So,
thank
you
so
much
for
the
time
on
this
and
please
pass
the
memo
by
him
and
as
a
Cohen.
A
N
N
Memo
I've
had
the
privilege
to
engage
with
San
Jose
staff
in
this
housing
element
process
as
part
of
their
great
community
outreach
work
I
think
it's
really
valuable
and
important
and
appropriate
that
Council
also
get
a
chance
to
weigh
in
on
the
housing
element
as
it
moves
through
the
process,
for
the
simple
reason
that
the
housing
element
is
really
important.
San
Jose
has
a
really
significant
housing
needs.
It
is
not
currently
on
Pace
to
meet
those
needs,
and
so
it's
going
to
need
to
consider
significant
policy
changes
in
order
to
address
its
housing
needs.
N
And
for
to
have
a
chance
to
weigh
in
and
to
identify
what
they
would
like
staff
to
prioritize
and
also
to
start
getting
familiar
with
the
type
of
changes
that
are
going
to
be
necessary
and
that
will
have
to
be
implemented
over
the
coming
years
so
strongly
supportive
of
this
memo.
This
is
such
an
important
measure
that
it's
really
important
to
have
active,
Council
engagement
on.
Thank
you.
C
Hi
Roy
Beekman
here
thanks
for
the
item,
I
I
lack
Gap
compared
to
the
other
people
who
speak
and
spoken
very
nicely
on
this
item,
to
learn
a
few
things
that
would
you
that
you'll
be
questioning
North
San
Jose
projects,
I'm
slowly,
learning
that
it
is
difficult
for
yourselves
to
talk
about
sea
level,
rise
issues
and
wanting
to
continue
to
build
housing
in
North,
San,
Jose,
I'm.
Sorry
to
say
that
so
bluntly,
I
I
hope
there
can
be
stock
ways
to
Simply
I.
C
Think
there
can
be
that
saying
that
you
know
we
have
to
be
considering
these
sort
of
options
in
the
future
of
housing,
North,
San,
Jose
and
it's
difficult
for
yourselves
I
think
is
what's
going
on
and
hopefully
by
just
simply
saying
it
here
at
public
comment
time
and
it
can
open
up
a
process
to
make
it
easier.
Good
luck
in
those
efforts
and
the
good
luck.
C
In
my
usual
questions,
working
with
the
state
towards
the
future
of
good
subsidy
programs
for
extremely
low
and
very
low
income,
housing
needs
I.
Think
to
really
you
know,
focus
on
on
subsidy
issues
with
the
state,
for
you
know.
Instead
of
six
to
18
months
more
two
to
five
year
programs,
subsidy
programs
for
the
unhoused
and
for
families,
boy
I-
think
it
could
really
solve
a
lot
of
issues
and
good
luck
in
that
organization.
C
How
you
can
talk
with
the
state
at
this
time
and
mixed
income
ideas
are
always
important.
Good
luck!
How
the
Bay
Area
can
talk
more
about
mixed
income
and
I.
Think
that's
about
it
for
myself
at
this
time,
and
thanks
for
deciding.
A
O
My
name
is
Carol
watts
and
I'm.
Vice
president
of
the
League
of
Women
Voters
of
San
Jose
Santa
Clara.
We
support
the
memo
authored
by
council
members,
Jimenez
and
Cohen.
Our
League's
housing
and
homelessness.
Commit
committee
is
closely
following
the
housing
element
issue
and
we
submitted
a
comment
letter
on
the
draft
plan
in
August.
O
The
league
strongly
believes
that
democratic
government
depends
upon
informed
and
active
participation
by
the
public.
Therefore,
immediately
after
the
compliance
letter
is
received
from
the
California
Department
of
Housing
and
Community
Development,
we
urge
the
city
manager
to
move
quickly
to
place
the
housing
element
item
on
our
city
council
meeting
agenda
with
ample
time
for
public
comment.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
N
B
F
Sure
thing
vice
mayor
yeah,
so
we
did,
we
did
submit
an
early
consideration
response
form.
We
reviewed
the
memo
and
we
have
given
this
a
green
light.
F
It
is
important,
though
we
kind
of
caution
that
green
light,
though,
because
any
additional
delay
could
potentially
push
a
final
adoption
by
the
council
back
to
August
of
2023
and
potentially
jeopardize
City
and
state
and
federal
funding,
and
so
we
just
want
to
kind
of
caution
that
we
we
definitely
hear
the
the
need
for
Community
engagement
and
are
in
complete
support
of
that.
But
we
do
want
to
caution
that
we
are
already
behind
on
this
work
and
any
additional
delays
can
can
be
detrimental.
B
Thank
you,
council
member
Jimenez,.
P
Thank
you
vice
mayor,
just
just
a
few
quick
comments.
As
one
of
the
authors
of
the
memo
you
know,
the
context
in
which
we
submitted
this
memo
is
is
really
that
the
current
housing
element
timeline
does
not
currently
include
an
opportunity
for
the
counselor
to
review
and
provide
input
before
the
final
approval
and
I
think
I
heard
micro
Brio
yesterday,
I
think
that
was
pushed
out
now
to
I,
think
June,
2023
and
so
I'll
just
say
that
and
Michael.
If
you're
on
the
call
or
someone
from
planning.
P
Let
me
know
if
that's
wrong,
but
that's
what
I
thought
I
heard
yesterday,
so
it
got
pushed
out
even
more
now,
staff
prepared
I
think
it's
important
to
acknowledge
it.
Staff
prepared
the
draft
largely
in
accordance
with
the
direction
provided
through
the
general
plan
and
other
type
of
policies
like
the
residential
anti-displacement
strategy
and
ongoing
housing
related
work,
which
makes
sense,
but
currently
the
process.
You
know,
after
receiving
those
expected
comments
from
hcd,
which
I
think
one
of
the
commenters
said
it's
expected.
P
However,
if
the
revision
is
required
by
hcd
or
significant
or
if
there
are
major
deficiencies
in
the
draft,
it
may
be
appropriate
for
first
to
First,
seek
input
from
the
council
and
that's
why
I
think
that
this
meeting
of
sorts
can
prove
important,
and
so
the
joint
memo
really
directs
staff
to
do
a
few
things
and
it's
simply
to
schedule
a
discussion
after
receiving
hcd
comments
to
allow
the
council
to
provide
input-
and
it's
been,
as
it's
been
mentioned
by
several
folks
that
have
called
in
I-
think
it's
it's
important,
because
it
may
be
challenging
for
staff
to
anticipate
or
guess
how
Council
may
want
to
revise
the
housing
element
comments
particularly
or
the
housing
element.
P
I
should
say,
particularly
if
the
revisions
May
deviate
significantly
from
the
general
plan.
Also
I
think
it's
better.
That
staff
know
sooner
rather
than
later,
how
the
council
may
wish
to
respond
on
hcd
comments,
rather
than
wait
until
after
final
approval,
for
you
know,
and
then
to
discover
that
maybe
Council
didn't
support
certain
recommended
changes
and
also
just
separately
I.
Think
it's
also
an
important
place
to
get
additional
public
input.
P
Now,
with
the
with
regard
to
the
comments
of
maybe
putting
some
of
the
funding
at
stake,
I
I,
obviously
that
resonates
with
me
and
I
think
that's
important
not
to
not
to
damage
that
opportunity,
but
I
I,
think
staff,
specifically
I,
think
it
was
Mr,
Michael,
Brio
related
to
our
team
and
and
I'm
sharing
this,
because
I
think
it
makes
sense,
and
that
is
that,
if
the
comments
back
from
HC
hcd
are
significant
in
nature
and
maybe
not
as
deep
as
we,
we
thought
they
would
be.
P
Then
I
have
no
problem
staff
come
in
before
this
body
and
then
saying
that
maybe
the
meeting
isn't
required
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
relay
that
that
that
was
my
perspective
and
so
I
hope.
You
all
consider
supporting
this.
Thank
you.
F
I've
asked
staff
to
kind
of
come
down
and
provide
some
additional
background
that
that
perhaps
can
can
address
some
of
the
the
the
concerns
and
the
issues
raised
around
Community
engagement
and
process
and
timeline.
So
we
can
get
a
better
handle
on
kind
of
what
next
steps
could
potentially
look
like.
So.
H
Great
thank
you:
Rosalind
Huey,
Deputy
city
manager.
First
I
want
to
thank
the
council
members
for
their
memoranda.
I
do
think
it's
important
to
First
clarify
just
a
few
things.
H
First
and
foremost,
staff
will
be
bringing
the
housing
element
to
the
city
council
for
their
consideration
and
action
that
is
now
being
scheduled
for
June
of
next
year.
So
I
know
that
there
were
a
few
commenters
who
perhaps
were
thinking
that
this
housing
element
what
gets
submitted
to
the
state
without
any
Council
consideration
or
action,
and
that
is
not
the
case.
We
of
course,
will
be
coming
to
council
right
now.
The
target
date
is
June
of
next
year
for
council's
consideration.
H
Final
action
before
the
housing
element
is
officially
submitted
to
the
state,
so
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that.
In
addition,
there
are
other
decision-making
bodies
who
will
also
review
the
draft
housing
element
and,
of
course
that
in
includes
the
airport,
lanyards
commission,
the
Housing
and
Community
Development
commission,
the
Planning
Commission.
So
there
are
other
bodies
who
will
be
involved
in
the
process
and
obviously
through
those
bodies.
Those
are
public
hearings
in
the
community,
obviously,
would
have
opportunity
to
comment
as
well
and
then,
lastly,
before
I
turn
it
over
to
staff
to
provide
more
details.
H
I
do
want
to
ensure
to
the
to
the
committee
and
to
the
members
of
the
public
that
there
has
been
a
pretty
extensive
Community
engagement
process
staff
started
in
September
of
2021.
With
that
Community
engagement.
Just
this
past
summer,
there
were
a
series
actually
of
community
meetings,
special
events.
H
There
were
webinars
all
types
of
activities
involved,
number
one
to
help
educate
our
community
number
one
about
what
the
housing
element
is
to
talk
about
the
various
components
and
to
then
really
hone
in
on
specific
issues,
as
it
relates
to
the
city
of
San
Jose
and
our
strategies
around
our
history
of
segregation
and
and
other
issues
regarding
housing
in
the
city.
So
just
wanted
to
provide
that
that
context
and
that
overview.
Q
Thank
you,
Michael
Brio,
deputy
director
of
city-wide
planning
I
just
want
to
elaborate
at
one
point
that
Rosalind
made,
and
that
is
that
we've
had
almost
2
000
people
that
have
participated
in
our
workshops
and
we've
had
4
000
discrete
responses
on
our
online
survey.
So
one
thing
I
think
it's
important
for
the
council,
or
the
committee.
Excuse
me
to
understand
is
that
that
our
housing
element
really
for
the
most
part,
is
working
within
the
framework
of
our
existing
General
plan.
Q
So
it's
not
proposing
significant.
You
know
new
bold
changes
that
we
haven't
already
talked
about
with
this
Council
and
our
general
plan.
It's
really
more
of
a
technical
exercise
to
show
that
we
have
the
sites
in
the
inventory
that
are
already
within
our
general
plan,
we're
also
developing
a
program
and
policies
to
further
implement
the
general
plan
and
remove
governmental
constraints,
etc.
For
the
most
part,
those
are
things
that
that
are
things
that
we're
already
doing,
or
we've
talked
about
with
counsel
I.
Do
want
to
note
that
we've
also
had
one-on-ones
with
the
council.
Q
The
mayor
over
the
last
fall
sharing
kind
of
where
we're
going
so
so
I
think
we
anticipate.
We've
been
in
conversations
with
other
cities
that
have
received
comments
on
their
housing
element
already
that
have
it
certified
and
what
we're,
what
we're
finding
we're,
also
working
with
our
planning,
collaborative
and
HC,
and
how
a
bag
staff
as
well.
What
we're
generally
finding
is
that
that
the
comments
that
we
can
expect
to
receive
for
the
most
part
are
going
to
be
comments
asking
for
additional
analysis,
clarification
and
more
data.
Q
So
what
we
were
not
expecting
to
see
is
that
comments
from
hcd
saying
you
need
to
do
significantly
bold
new
moves
or
steps
that
are
things
that
you
already
aren't,
including
in
your
housing
element,
so
mind
you
if
we
were
to
get
some
really
significant
feedback
that
we
need
to
do
some
really
bold
changes
of
moves
by
all
means.
We,
we
believe
that
we
would
need
to
bring
that
back
to
council
and
talk
about
that
with
Council.
Q
But
at
this
point
we're
not
expecting
that
and
I
think
what
we're
asking
is
that
staff
has
a
discretion
to
review
the
comments
and
really
and
understand
what
they
are
and
and
if
there
is
a
need,
we
will
bring
it
back.
Q
If
there's
not
let
the
administration
sort
of
determine
that
the
one
issue
I
do
want
to
bring
up
and
and
sort
of
the
downside
of
of
of
coming
back
to
council
and
say
it
would
probably
be
March
or
end
of
February,
which
by
all
means
again,
if
we
need
to
do
that,
we
understand.
Q
But
if,
if
there's
not
a
need,
the
the
unintended
consequences
of
that,
we
anticipate
it
would
delay
us
admitting
the
the
the
housing
element
for
certification
from
June
to
August
of
next
year,
which
would
result
in
us
being
ineligible
for
significant
housing
and
transportation.
Grant
funding
opportunities
for
a
couple
more
months,
and
so
our
approach
right
now
is
to
is
to
we're
not
going
to
meet
the
deadline
established
by
the
state,
but
to
minimize
the
amount
of
time
we're
out
of
clients.
Q
E
Yeah,
thank
you
and
thank
you
for
your
comments.
Let
me
ask
a
follow-up
question
about
the
reason
in
what
that
you're
suggesting
a
potential
delay
is.
Is
that
because
a
council
change
in
Direction
at
that
stage
would
potentially
then
have
to
be
incorporated
and
would
cause
a
delay
or
is
it
the
act
or
is
it
because
of
the
time
it
takes
to
prepare
for
the
that
the
meeting
itself,
so
it
could.
Q
Be
both
the
the
delay
to
August
is
assuming
that
the
council
makes
no
policy
changes
that
are
significant.
I
mean
the
the
two-month
delay
is
about
the
amount
of
time
and
work.
That's
involved
to
take
write
a
memo
and
bring
it
to
council
for
discussion,
so
the
staff
that
would
be
working
on
responding
on
to
the
comments
from
hcd
would
be
pulled
off
of
that
and
would
refocus
their
efforts
to
be.
Q
Writing
a
memo
to
council
and
preparing
for
that
here,
so
that
we
have
a
very
small
staff,
both
in
housing
and
planning
and
and
so
do.
We
want
them
working
on
responding
on
comments
or
do
we
want
them
working
on
completing
the
housing
or
coming
to
council
with
the
discussion
again,
if
there
is
some
really
big
items
that
are
worthy
of
council
discussion
by
all
means,
we
should
come
back
to
council,
but
I.
N
And
council
member,
if
I,
can
just
qualify
just
what
Michael's
saying
that
part
of
the
reason
it
takes?
Is
it's
going
to
impact
us
two
months
to
put
together
a
study
session
is
because
our
current
timeline
is
sitting
right
up
against
the
July
recess,
and
so
that
puts
another
month
on
our
ability
to
move
forward
through
public
hearings
and
bring
the
final
adoption
before
counts.
E
Yeah
I
underst
I
understood
that
part
that
August
was
just
because
end
of
June
becomes
August,
I,
guess
I'm
going
to
push
back
a
little
bit
only
in
the
sense
that
obviously
there
has
to
be
a
preparation
for
the
council
meeting
in
June,
which
has
to
be
you
know,
have
a
thorough
presentation
and
memo
and
I'm
not
suggesting
that
that
the
same
level
has
to
be
ready
for
a
study
session.
E
E
So
some
people
may
not
feel
like
they
need
this
as
much
as
others.
We'll
have
three
for
sure
new
council
members,
if
not
more
by
the
time
spring,
comes
without
any
benefit
of
having
seen
the
one-on-one
presentations
that
we've
had
and
I
will
point
out
to
sort
of.
From
my
own
experience
to
say
we
had
the
one-on-one
presentation
in
our
office
and
left
that
meeting
feeling
like
we
still
don't
understand
the
housing
element
at
all.
E
Honestly,
so
I
think
there's
an
important
it's
important
for
us
when
we
talk
to
our
community
about
what
this
means,
what
the
plans
are
for
the
city
to
really
be
able
to
understand
it,
and
when
I
was
at
the
league
of
cities
meeting
earlier
this
month,
it
was
interesting.
The
top
big
main
topic
around
just
amongst
council
members
from
various
cities,
was
what's
in
your
housing
Outlet.
What's
in
your
housing
element,
what's
you
know?
What
are
you
doing
for
the
housing
element?
E
It
was
really
being
talked
about
and
I
felt
like
I,
couldn't
even
explain
it
now,
it's
it's
much
different
I
I
could
I
joke
about.
I
could
easily
tell
you
in
10
seconds
the
Monte
Sereno
housing
element,
because
I
heard
it
from
the
monasterino
council
member
and
it's
very
different
than
San
Jose,
but
that's
what
that's.
E
Just
hoping,
there's
a
way
for
us
to
have
that
discussion
with
the
council
with
the
new
Council
and
in
a
way
that
we
can
learn
from
each
other
in
that
discussion,
without
necessarily
creating
a
huge
amount
of
work,
I
mean
when
we
have
the
one-on-one
presentations.
There
is
a
presentation
being
given
to
us
when
we
have
the.
If
we
were
to
say
to
you,
I
need
another
briefing,
you
would
provide
it,
so
there
should
be
a
way
for
us
to
do
this.
That's
not
going
to
provide
create
so
much
work.
H
Councilman
go
ahead.
Well,
thank
you,
so
much
councilmember,
Cohen
and
actually
I
wanted
to
offer
perhaps
a
suggestion
or
an
idea,
because
really
today
we
don't
know
what
comments
we
are
going
to
receive
from
the
state
or
in
our
initial.
Our
first
draft
I
would
suggest
perhaps
that
when
we
do
get
those
comments
back
from
the
state
in
the
time
frame,
we
were
expecting
December.
Is
that
staff
then
issue
an
info
memo
right
so
that
we
can
communicate
to
the
full
Council
to
the
public
at
large?
H
What
those
comments
are
and
then
at
that
time,
if
if
it
turns
out
they're,
very
substantial
and
we
think
warrants
yes,
we
need
to
have
a
conversation
with
our
with
our
Council
and
with
the
public
about
these
substantial
comments.
Then
we
schedule
that
council
meeting
at
that
time
just
wanted
to
offer
that
as
a
as
an
idea
because
currently
like
right
now,
we're
not
sure
the
amount
of
comments
we're
going
to
get
and
I
know
this
staff
has
been
working
very
hard.
We
know
that
what
we're
submitting
is
quite
comprehensive,
I
know.
H
E
And
I
meant
to
preface
all
what
I
said
as
to
by
saying
none
of
this
is
meant
as
a
disparagement
of
all
the
work
and
all
of
the,
and
you
know
what
the
staff
has
been
doing
on
this.
It's
more
of
a
partly
a
disparagement
in
myself.
I,
don't
understand
it
fully
and
want
a
chance
to
understand
it
better.
So
you
know
I
I
get
it
that
we
don't
want
to
create
more
work.
E
Obviously,
in
some
sense,
if
there's
a
lot
of
significant
comments
from
hcd,
then
there's
even
more
work,
which
would
then
be
delayed
more
by
having
this
hearing,
but
even
with
few
comments
from
hcd.
This
should
be
an
opportunity
for
us
to
to
have
one
round
at
it
before
we
have
to
finally
approve
it
in
June,
I
find
that
sometimes
it's
better
to
have
that
pre-discussion
before
the
final
decision
is
made
in
June.
That's
that's
kind
of
my
feeling
about
it,
but
I'll
leave
it
at
that
and
that
others
maybe
weigh
in.
B
R
Sure
hi
I'm
Jackie,
Morales
friend,
I'm,
the
director
of
Housing
and
yes,
so
the
biggest
challenge
that
we're
facing
is
because
we're
not
able
to
submit
it
on
time.
We
will
not
have
a
certified
housing
element,
which
will
mean
that
we
will
be
unable
to
apply
for
certain
hcd
funding,
and
that
includes
some
of
the
Asic
funding,
which
is
the
affordable
housing
that
is
tied
to
Transportation.
San
Jose
has
been
very
successful.
Those
grants
have
ranged
anywhere
from
one
and
a
half
million
to
over
12
million
dollars
in
funding
for
affordable
housing.
R
That's
one
of
our
concerns.
There
are
also
a
specific
Transportation
grants
and
we're
trying
to
document
what
the
amounts
are
for.
Those
particular
grants
that
the
that
they
will
not
be
able
to
apply
for
because
we
don't
have
a
certified
element,
so
that,
frankly,
has
been
our
biggest
concern.
Is
the
you
know
the
delays
and
the
timing
of
those
grants.
R
We
have
been
watching
very
carefully
and
trying
to
work
with
hcd
to
understand
when
those
grants
will
come
out
and
it
weighs
very
heavily,
especially
on
the
affordable
housing
side,
because
we
need,
as
you
know,
every
dollar,
to
help
us
to
move
our
affordable
projects
forward
and
the
infrastructure
grants
that
are
coming
with
those
have
been
you
know,
have
helped
to
not
only
build
the
affordable
housing
but
to
make
the
surrounding
area
more
Transportation
friendly
and
walkable
they're.
The
kind
of
Investments
that
make
our
community
better.
B
The
potential
delay
from
June
to
August
is
that,
assuming
that
it's
not
a
major
revision
or
is
it,
can
you
give
me
some
context
in
terms
of?
Is
there
a
potential
for
this
thing
to
even
be
pushed
out
further
farther
than
than
August
based
on
well.
Q
I
mean
it
could
so
there's
a
couple
things
that
happen
one
is
we
could
get
a
lot
a
lot
of
comments
that
need
a
lot
more
work.
I
again,
it
probably
won't
be
new
policies
and
new
programs.
It's
probably
going
to
be
more
like
you
picked
all
these
sites
in
your
inventory.
We
need
more
justification
on
those
sites
or
show
us
more
analysis
on
this,
so
that's
possible.
Q
That
could
add
to
the
time
and
then,
of
course,
if,
if
counsel
you
know,
if
Council
wants
us
to
explore
different
things
that
are
not
currently
proposed,
you
know
that
could
also
add
time,
but
you
know
right
now
we're
assuming
a
a
healthy
dose
of
comments
and
kind
of
built
in
being
a
little
resp
to
respond
to
those
and
keep
the
schedule
that
we
have,
which
is
by
the
end
of
the
fiscal
year.
Okay,.
B
And
then
my
last
question
is,
when
you
address
part
of
it
with
an
info
memo
in
giving
Council
the
opportunity
of
receiving
that
that
info
memo
and
then
making
a
determination,
whether
it's
something
that
we
want
to
you
know,
engage
in
more
Community
input.
Is
there
an
opportunity
for
the
community
to
still
provide
feedback
or
comments,
or
is
it
pretty
much
closed
off?.
Q
No
I
mean
the
official
state
required
public
comment
period
for
the
first
draft
is
closed
as
per
the
state
rules,
but
we
are
continually
open
to
and
have
been
getting
comments
and
feedback.
So
it's
an
Open
Door.
B
Q
And
additionally,
so
I
think
you
know
the
other
thing
we've
heard
from
hcd,
which
is
unique.
Other
cities
are
claiming
that
they
didn't
get
this
so
maybe
because
we're
the
third
largest
city
in
the
state,
where
it
gets
a
little
bit
of
privilege
here
but
they're
going
to
give
us
some
initial
comments
in
45
days
and
some
cities
have
gotten
comments,
there's
a
need
for
more
Outreach.
Q
We
we
think
we've
done
a
lot
of
Outreach,
but
that
could
be
a
comment
so
that
those
are
the
kind
of
things
that
we'll
hear
and
based
on
that,
we
may
proactively
do
more
Outreach.
But
we
don't
know
what
that
comment
will
be,
but
yeah
there's
definitely
ongoing
opportunities
for
for
comments
to
come
in.
There's
going
to
likely
be
three
drafts
of
this
we're
anticipating
so.
R
All
of
the
housing
element
woven
together,
and
so
because
we
have
all
these
other
bodies
that
we
have
to
bring
the
entire
housing
element
to.
There
will
be
additional
opportunity
for
the
community
to
hear
the
entire
housing
element
and
how
all
the
pieces
fit
in
in
those
meetings
and
and
I
believe
all
those
will
occur
before
it
comes
to
council,
so
that
will
be
valuable
feedback
to
the
staff
because,
of
course,
we'll
be
tracking
and
listening
through
those
other
public
meetings
as
well.
B
Thank
you
so
I'm,
very
supportive
of
the
suggestion
of
of
doing
the
info
memo
as
well
as
all
the
community
outreach
that
we
just
talked
about
in
community
input.
B
I
would
back
to
entertain
a
motion
to
to
capture
that
if
one
of
my
colleagues
is
willing
to
make
it
so
moved.
B
Recommendation
that
staff
will
come
back
with
an
info
memo
after
they've,
received
comments
from
hcd
and
that
they
would
engage
in
a
community
outreach
process.
Community
input
process
that
was
just
described
by
staff.
A
E
H
Sure
so
councilmember
Cohen.
Currently
our
schedule
is
that
the
airport
land
use
commission,
but
here
the
item
either
at
its
March
or
April
meeting
the
Housing
and
Community
Development
commission
will
hear
the
item
at
its
May
meeting
and
the
Planning
Commission
would
hear
it
at
their
meeting
next
year
and,
as
Jackie
pointed
out,
obviously
there's
opportunity
for
members
of
the
public
to
participate
in
those
hearings
to
provide
comment.
Email
staff
with
questions
as
well.
E
Yeah
I
I
am
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
how
that
can
tie
into
something
with
Council
as
well.
I
mean,
in
other
words,
I'm
trying
to
figure
out.
The
last
thing
I
want
to
do
is
is
cause
any
delay
because
of
a
recommendation
that
we
make
that
that's
never
been.
That's
not
my
intention
at
all,
there's,
obviously
things
that
have
to
be
done
to
prepare
for
these
other
Milestones
along
the
way
that
I'm
thinking
can
prepare
for
something
that
Council
can
do
as
well,
but
without
having
to
create
some
extra
work.
E
I
I'm
still
I,
like
the
the
idea
of
some
flexibility,
still
asking
for
us
to
prepare
and
maybe
set
aside
a
study
date,
but
have
flexibility
for
weather
staff.
What
recommendation
staff
has
after
getting
the
input
as
far
as
whether
it's
something
that
would
be
needed
or
necessary,
and
whether
what
they
you
know,
whether
or
not
they
feel
that
it'll
be
a
delay?
I
mean,
for
example,
in
not
just
not
just
the
question
of.
E
Are
there
significant
enough
changes,
but
if
we
did
this,
would
it
delay-
and
we
won't
know
that
until
we're
at
the
point
where
you
get
the
comments
and
you
see
how
much
work
needs
to
be
done?
I
still
think.
There's
a
large
benefit
to
us
having
this
open
discussion
somehow
with
the
whole
Council
before
it
comes
in
June
I'd
like
to
include
setting
aside
a
potential
hearing
for
that,
but
allow
the
flexibility
to
say.
E
If
we
you
know
we,
if
this
is
going
to
disrupt
our
process
or
it's
going
to
or
or
we
you
know,
don't
think
that
this
isn't
necessary
and
we
got
enough
out
of
the.
We
can
give
you
enough
in
an
info
memo.
E
Then
we
we
were
able
to
cancel
it
at
that
point
and
have
that
conversation
with
the
rules
committee
about
canceling
it,
but
I
I
like
the
idea
of
having
that
lined
up,
so
that
we
think
about
that
as
a
as
an
option
for
those
of
us
who
feel
important
that
it's
important,
that
we
have
this
discussion
and
it's
and
it's
it's
both
for
the
public,
but
also
for
the
council
as
a
whole,
so
that
we're
not
having
that
discussion
only
one
time
in
June
when
it's
coming
and
at
that
point
has
to
be
approved.
F
Well,
councilmember,
perhaps
you
know
it
seems
like
a
determined
that
the
key
determinant
here
is
really
the
feedback
that
we
get
in
December
right
in
the
content.
Within
that
it
could
be
minimal,
it
could
be
more
loaded.
Perhaps
we
we
defer
that
decision
to
that
time.
F
I
think
what
we
can
do
as
staff
is
based
on
that
feedback
and
comment,
make
an
assessment
right
then,
and
there
number
one
issue
the
info
memo
to
to
to
Sunshine
the
the
issues
but
also
having
have
in
mind,
or
at
least
on
our
radar-
that,
if
they're,
substantive
and
really
in
need
of
a
more
in-depth
conversation
that
at
that
time,
work
working
within
the
city
manager's
office
to
agendize
a
meeting
at
that
time.
If
it's
so
needed,
you
know
we
definitely
are
open
to
doing
that.
F
We
definitely
are
committed
to
really
reconciling
what
we're
hearing
during
public
comment
around
the
need
for
the
appropriate
Community
engagement
and
then
kind
of
reconciling
that
with
process
and
time
and
staff
constraints.
But
if
you're
open
to
that,
you
know
we
we
could
definitely,
and
with
that
in
mind,.
B
Is
that
all
right
with
the
okay,
with
the
secondary.
F
B
B
A
C
Aye
Blair
Beekman
here,
thanks
for
the
meeting
today,
I
hope
this
can
be
a
time
to
consider
healing
as
a
more
holistic
open,
shared
Community
process.
This
fall
so
I
don't
have
so
I.
Don't
want
to
use
hostility
in
trying
to
learn
to
talk
about
better
ideas
of
clarity
and
to
try
to
better
address
the
current
status
quo,
with
San
Jose
data
and
Technology
collection
practices.
C
I
hope
yourselves
will
consider
this
and
we'll
also
want
to
consider
what
can
be
trusting
patient
healing
good
terms
in
the
next
few
months
in
a
safe
space
to
talk
about
these
sort
of
things
openly,
honestly
and
decently.
A
public
comment
time.
Interestingly,
at
this
point,
I
can
simply
blend.
My
public
comment
from
item
2.14
yesterday
of
intergovernment
practices
into
item
3.5
of
San
Jose
Public
project
ideas
for
2023.
C
I
am
hoping
ideas
of
good
civil
protections,
openness,
clearness
and
honesty
with
data
collection,
the
everyday
Community
can
simply
be
first
and
foremost
for
San
Jose,
City
Government.
This
fall
in
San
Jose
a
year
ago.
At
this
time,
the
everyday
community
of
Berkeley
was
up
in
arms
in
how
law
enforcement
data
from
its
aopr
street
light
surveillance,
Tech
electronic
Billboards
Etc
was
being
given
to
LexisNexis
and
other
data
collection
services
and
then
bundled
and
sold
to
other
law
enforcement
and
Commercial
agencies.
C
Berkeley
has
recently
completed
work
in
the
past
year
to
tighten
up
the
Civil
protections
of
an
everyday
persons
and
the
Immigrant
population
of
the
sanctuary
city
of
Berkeley,
and
how
data
collection
is
now
shared.
San
Jose
needs
to
learn
to
take
these
lessons
to
Heart
at
this
time
and
do
something
to
the
same
thing
in
a
plethora
of
new
aopr
use
that
is
taking
place
in
San
Jose
at
this
time.
C
Hopefully,
in
a
shorter
amount
of
time,
six
months
to
a
year,
San
Jose
should
be
able
to
develop
its
own
interesting,
useful
ideas
of
civil
rights
and
civil
protection
ideas
with
data
collection
for
everyday
community
and
the
Immigrant
community
of
San
Jose
I.
Guess,
thanks
for
your
time,
I
hope
we
can
really
work
on
this
stuff.
This
fall
and
I
I
like
to
continue
talking
about
it.
Thank
you.
A
D
I
would
also
ask
the
city
to
consider
requiring
the
cell
towers
in
high
power
outage
areas
to
have
backups
is
either
a
generator
or
battery,
so
that
cell
service
is
not
dropped.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration.
This
has
become
a
very
difficult
and
very
frustrating
and
I'm
sure
you
all
will
help
in
some
manner
to
secure
better
infrastructure
for
all
of
us
in
the
city
and
especially
those
who
are
in
districts
that
continue
to
have
significant
number
of
power
outages
with
long
durations.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
I
Hi
Marissa
O'connell
gsmol
representing
mobile
home
park
residents.
Thank
you
very
much
for
those
of
you
who
participated
in
the
CED
meeting
yesterday
and
the
issue
of
the
mobile
home
park.
Land
use
designation
is
going
to
Council
on
the
18th
of
October.
I
would
ask
that
you
do
it
in
the
late
afternoon
or
early
evening.
History
has
shown
us
that
a
lot
of
the
folks
who
call
in
are
seniors
and
they
are
unable
to
sit
up
late.
So
please
give
us
a
Time
certain
or
a
not
before
late
afternoon
or
early
evening.
I
The
second
comment
I
need
to
make
at
to
is
to
Tony.
Tony
I
got
a
number
of
contacts
after
that
meeting
from
senior
folks
who
don't
understand
how
to
update
their
Zoom
I
believe
those
are
the
words
you
use
I'm,
not
sure,
but
they
get
very
confused
and
they
don't
know
how
to
do
it.
So
I'm
going
to
be
telling
everyone
forget
the
zoom,
you
can
watch
it
on
TV
mute,
your
TV
to
be
on
the
phone,
so
I
respectfully
request
that
the
staff
might
consider
telling
some
of
these
folks.