►
Description
City of San José, California
Joint meeting of Rules and Open Government / Committee of the Whole of June 22, 2022
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda: https://sanjose.granicus.com/AgendaViewer.php?view_id=51&event_id=4689
A
A
C
B
B
B
A
A
D
I
wanted
to
comment
on
the
upcoming
power
energy
ideas
of
the
council
meeting
community
power,
energy
mixed
use,
ideas,
I'm
gonna
save
that,
for
maybe
I
guess
next
week
I
guess
to
comment
on
the
measure:
t
work,
plan
and
implementation
things
coming
up.
Good
luck:
how
to
really
include
measure
t
ideas
more
in
your
future
they're
looking
for
new
ideas,
how
to
grow
a
bit
as
a
body.
Good
luck:
how
to
help
that
process
with
them
to
be
a
more
community
focused
minded
open
process,
they're.
D
D
D
There's
anti-displacement
issues
and
there's
also
a
like
to
community
engagement
consultants.
Good
luck
in
those
efforts,
those
are
efforts.
You
know
I
I'm
I'm
always
trying
to
look
for
ways
that
the
community
can
be
more
involved
with
things.
The
mayor
and
yourselves
talked
yesterday,
how
you
know
the
housing
project
on
the
west
side
that
that's
a
community
effort.
Good
luck,
how
we
can
really
work
on
community
things
coming
up
in
the
next
six
months
and
into
the
next
mayoral
administration.
B
C
Again,
vice
mayor,
I
won't
promise
when
you
will
end,
but
I
can
assure
you
the
staff
has
been
over
this
and
items
that
legally
or
operationally,
don't
need
to
be
heard,
have
been
pushed
off
into
august.
So,
while
it
is
an
intense
and
long
agenda,
as
you
can
see,
there's
several
deferrals
into
the
month
of
august.
B
Okay,
I
appreciate
that
and
we'll
make
her
the
motion
make
note
of
that.
Councilmember
davis.
E
Thank
you
vice
mayor
I
wanted
to
ask,
I
saw
it,
doesn't
have
a
it,
has
a
regular
start
time
of
1
30
or
we
sticking
with
that
recommendation.
E
Okay
and
then
I
noticed
that
the
item
from
my
district,
that
was
on
consent
last
week,
that
got
deferred
or
for
yesterday
that
got
deferred
to
next
week,
is
not
on
consent.
Now
is
there
a
reason
for
that
council
member?
It
was
10.18
on
yesterday's
agenda
deferred
to
next
week,
and
I
see
it
is
not
on
consent.
Now
it's
on
it's
10.2.
C
Yeah,
I
believe
that
is
because
we
received
inquiries
on
a
discussion.
So
let
me
check
with
the
gender
services
team
offline,
but
I
believe
that's
why
it's
been
taken
off
consent.
F
My
question
is
around
is
around
3.4
actions
related
to
the
measure,
t
status
report
on
the
work
plan
and
implementation
updates,
and
so
I
see
that
there
is
a
staff
recommendation
to
defer
the
policy
decision
to
funding
projects
identified
in
table
four
and
then,
of
course,
some
in
parentheses,
there's
lake
cunningham
peace.
Why
is
that
policy
decision
deferred
so
long.
C
Councilmember
lee
wilcox
again,
my
understanding
after
talking
to
staff
today
is
towards
the
end
of
the
year.
They'll
have
more
costs
the
existing
projects
fine-tuned
and
it's
a
better
time
for
you
to
actually
make
that
policy
call
once
they
understand
how
much
they're
going
to
need
or
how
much
they
can
keep
in
reserve.
So
my
understanding
is
basically
they
give
you
more
information
before
the
council
weighs
in
on
that
policy.
Discussion.
F
Well,
it
you
know
it's
what
comes
first,
the
chicken
or
the
a.
I
think
you
have
to
decide
the
priority
before
you
decide
so
that
you
can
on
funding
rather
than
have
funding
to
spend
for
you,
I
would
prefer
not
to
have
the
the
decision
deferred
until
next
year,
I'm
hoping
until
maybe
the
end
of
the
year
in
december,
if
that
is
potentially
long
enough
to
create
buffer,
to
give
the
staff
some
time
to
put
that
together.
C
G
Oh,
the,
since
it's
this
is
always
difficult,
since
it's
already
on
the
agenda,
is
it
just
a
return
that
you
want
council,
member
yeah,
so
it's.
G
Oh
okay
and
that's
just
a
the
measure,
t
yeah
you
can
you
can
ask
for
that.
It's
a
it's
an
acceptance
of
the
status
report
and
you
can
ask
for
that
type
of
return
and
the
council
can
either
agree
or
not
agree.
That's
fine!
That
type
of
change
is
okay,
because
it's
not
a
change
in
the
action
or
what
we're
requesting
council
to
do.
C
G
Yeah,
I'm
sorry,
I
misunderstood
the
question
yeah.
So
technically
it's
it's
already
on
the
agenda
and
it's
set
up
with
with
the
the
december
return.
So
I
really
think
it
it
would
have
to
be
asked
or
requested
at
the
council
meeting
council
member.
Okay,
okay,
got
it
all
right!
Thank
you.
Thanks.
C
Say
in
the
comments
in
the
meantime,
council
reyna
saw
kipp,
parkness
and
matt
cano
follow
up
with
you
on
that.
Make
sure
that
you
know
that
they're
able
to
meet
that
december
timeline.
If
you'd
like
to
move
forward
with
that.
F
I
I
appreciate
that,
and
you
know
I've
made
efforts
to
ensure
that
there's
some
budget
setting
up
for
any
overages
that
there
are
in
the
projects
and
so
I'm
very
confident
that
our
public
safety
infrastructure
needs
to
be
protected
and
and.
F
F
I
G
Yeah
but
vice
mayor
may
I
just
make
one
comment
on
on
the
motion
and
call
something
out
that
I
need
to
call
out
on
the
ad
sheet.
E26
may
have
a
legal
issue,
so
we
may
be
bringing
that
forward
to
council
next
week
with
a
little
bit
of
a
change
up.
That's
all.
F
A
D
Hi
glare
beekman
here
you
have
some
dumpster
days
in
your
consent
calendar
this
week
and
it's
nice
as
you.
You
often
do,
and
I
haven't
mentioned
them
for
a
while.
D
I
thought
I
would
just
mention
that
the
idea
of
dumpster
days,
I
think,
is
a
great
idea
on
a
saturday
afternoon
for,
or
you
know,
possibly
a
weekday,
but
especially
on
a
saturday
morning
for
different
for
a
dumpster
to
be
placed
in
a
local
neighborhood
and
for
you
know,
people
of
all
around
the
neighborhood
to
be
able
to
put
in
their
stuff.
D
I
think
it's
providing
a
great
service
and
it's
an
interesting
concept
that
I
I
think
san
jose
is
really,
interestingly
addressing
the
trash
issues
and
they're
they're,
making
that
extra
effort-
and
it
can
be
a
real
community,
good
experience
for
all
parts
of
the
community
to
attend
thanks
a
lot
for
it.
Thanks
for
your
work,
san
jose
on
this
issue
of
trash
and
how
to
how
to
address
our
trash
in
san
jose,
you
to
mention
council
person,
john's
ideas
of
fun,
it's
ideas
of
humor
and
fun
and
enjoyment.
D
So
thank
you.
There's
also
there's
gonna,
be
a
gun
study
meeting
coming
up
in
august
done
study
session.
Thank
you
for
that
to
you
know
further
my
words
from
last
week.
I
think
it's
a
real
important
time
that
all
parts
of
the
community
can
weigh
in
on
the
concepts
of
how
they
want
the
future
of
their
government
to
work
well
and
it's
and
it's
a
lesson
in
how
our
community
can
band
together
towards
better
bureaucratic
practices
of
our
government
and
good
oversight,
to
make
sure
that
they're.
D
You
know
that
they're
following
the
letter
and
working
towards
good
counseling
programs,
you
know
for
domestic
violence
and
other
issues.
Good
luck,
how
we
can
hold
government
accountable.
On
those
terms,
I
think
that's
the
purpose
of
this
sort
of
gun
laws
and
gun
fees
that
I
think
isn't
hopeful
for
all
of
us.
Thank
you.
B
All
right,
councilmember
erin,
she
had
your
hand.
A
F
J
B
Okay,
we
have
a
motion
in
two
seconds,
so
tony
arenas.
A
K
Hello,
my
name
is
arshon
and
I'm
a
student
in
san
jose.
I've
lived
in
san
jose
all
my
life
and
it's
been
a
place
of
opportunity
for
me,
but
as
we
come
out
of
coba
lockdowns
and
start
to
return
back
to
life
as
normal,
it's
really
essential
that
the
city
and
the
county
provide
safety
for
every
single
citizen.
K
Looking
at
statistics
from
the
government,
it's
been
quite
shocking.
Not
only
is
there
an
uptick
in
crime,
but
our
justice
system
just
isn't
working
the
way
it's
supposed
to.
We
can't
allow
repeat
offenders
to
endanger
public
safety
and
keep
going
in
and
out
of
prison,
because
I've
seen
the
violent
effects
and
terrible
effects
of
crime.
In
my
own
neighborhood
like
instances
of
car
break-ins,
I
urge
the
committee
to
pass
this
memo
today
for
a
full
discussion
in
council.
K
This
shouldn't
really
be
treated
as
a
question
of
politics,
because
every
single
day
that
we
make
more
and
more
people
are
being
released
back
into
our
neighborhoods
because
we're
not
holding
repeat
offenders
accountable
because
our
elected
officials
have
an
obligation
to
hold
violent,
violent,
repeated
offenders
accountable
and
keep
our
communities
safe.
I
urge
the
committee
to
pass
this
memo.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
A
E
Hi,
my
name
is
arushi
and
I'm
also
a
student
in
san
jose
and
as
a
citizen
here,
I've
come
to
enjoy
the
typical
city
past
time
activities
of
my
friends
and
family
I'd
like
to
ensure
that
the
city
and
county
government
continue
to
provide
a
high
level
of
safety.
So
this
quality
of
life
can
continue.
The
statistics
coming
out
of
the
county
are
alarming,
and
I
urge
the
committee
to
pass
this
memorandum
today
for
a
full
discussion
of
the
council.
E
Please
do
not
make
this
a
political
matter
or
push
this
off,
since
these
people
continue
to
be
released
back
into
our
neighborhoods.
This
community
will
keep
track
and
hold
accountable
those
responsible
with
each
crime
that
occurs
at
the
hands
of
a
violent
repeat,
offender
or
someone
who
fails
to
appear
in
court.
A
J
Hello,
I'm
stanton.
I
am
also
a
student
in
san
jose
growing
up
in
san
jose.
I've
always
enjoyed
it
as
like
a
very
safe
community.
I
remember
playing
basketball
in
my
local
park.
You
know
very
fondly
as
a
kid.
You
know
you
know
playing
catch
with
my
dad
etc,
but
it
seems
like
recently,
you
know
the
safety
and
security
of
our
city
has
been
endangered.
J
It's
really
the
obligation
of
the
city
and
county
governments
to
protect
their
constituents
and
that's
why
I'm
asking
you
guys
to
pass
this
memorandum
day
today
for
full
discussion
at
the
council.
I
can't
speak
towards
the
statistics,
but
just
personally
in
the
last
month
I've
had
packages
stolen
I've
had
my
house
robbed.
I've,
like
you
know,
very,
very
up
close
and
personal
experience.
You
know
the
lack
of
security
in
our
city,
and
so
I
urge
you
guys
to
to
pass
this
memorandum
for
further
discussion.
Thank
you.
L
Yes,
thank
you.
My
name
is
rose
sullivan
and
I'm
a
san
jose
resident,
and
I
also
oversee
a
few
commercial
properties
with
with
retail
tenants.
I
want
to
affirm
matthew,
mayhen's
mayhem's,
stand
on
repeat
offenders.
L
When
it
comes
to
the
drug
addiction
and
people
on
meth,
I
don't
believe
they
should
be
allowed
to
be
released
or
or
repeatedly
released.
They
are
truly
a
danger
to
the
community,
and
you
know
my.
L
I
don't
understand
why
we
are
releasing
violent
offenders
and
you
know
I
understand
that
some
crimes
may
not
be
considered
violent
and
I
know
that's
a
topic
for
the
legislation
that
has
to
change
on
prop
47
and
if,
if
there's
anything
any
of
you
can
do
on
that,
it
would
be
greatly
appreciated
because
it
is
hurting.
So
many
people,
one
just
one
small
comment
for
this
gun
study
it.
L
D
All
right,
blair
beekman
here,
a
procedural
point
that
I
I
like
you
know
the
efficiency
and
neatness
of
sometimes
council,
president
joan
of
vice
mayor
jones,
asked
for
public
comment
first
for
these
sort
of
items,
but
I
think
it
would
be
nice
to
hear
the
the
staff
report
first
before
public
comment
to
simply
note
procedurally
in
the
future
for
the
future.
D
You
know
for
this
item
boy,
I'm
I'm
just
a
big,
muddled
mess
on
how
to
better
understand
this
issue,
but
I
I'm
really.
You
know
I
understand
that
we're
trying
to
find
ways
to
to
to
tighten
up
ourselves
on
crime
issues
a
bit
and
you
know
you've
done
laura's
laws
things,
and
I
I've
noted
that
you
know
to
to
encourage
and
to
invite
the
the
people
the
the
people
committed
crime
themselves
to
their
own
therapy
and
how
to
really
create
that
sort
of
process
for
them.
D
D
Well,
these
kind
of
measures
I
understand
they're
needed,
but
I
really
have
to
give
the
example
of
paul
soto,
who
really
wasn't
doing
anything
wrong,
but
he
has
been
slammed
back
into
the
jail
prison
system
when
he
shouldn't
have
to
have
been-
and
I
think
we're
all
hurting
from
that
and
I
think
we're
all
trying
to
better
cope
and
understand
what
we
could
have
done
and
paul
too.
What
paul
could
have
also
done
so
we
wouldn't
have
to
be
stuck
in
that
situation.
We
were
with
paul
good
luck.
D
M
Good
evening
or
excuse
me
afternoon,
david
heindel
wear
a
lot
of
hats,
including
owning
a
hot
works
business
in
downtown
san
jose
on
santa
clara
street,
between
market
and
first,
we
just
replaced
our
front
window
due
to
it
being
destroyed
one
night,
every
single
storefront
on
our
block
has
been
destroyed
at
some
point
over
the
last
two
years.
I
also
am
the
president
of
my
homeowners
association.
M
Our
community
pool
was
broken
into
two
of
the
last
three
nights:
we're
trying
to
figure
out
what
to
do
about
that,
and
I'm
also
a
member
founding
member
of
the
all
district
leadership
group,
which
is
all
10
districts
in
the
city.
Clearly,
the
fact
that
for
us
at
our
homeowners
association
we're
trying
to
decide
whether
a
higher
security
to
watch
our
neighborhood
for
the
catalytic
converters
and
the
like,
but
the
conversation
ends
up
with
well
they'll
just
get
out
again
and
nothing
will
happen,
and
so
why
bother?
M
And
so
this
effort
to
try
to
address
people
who
are
multiple
offenders.
30
people
over
10
is
something
that
seems
to
be
a
germane
for
the
council
to
discuss.
I
urge
you
to
discuss
it
at
your
next
meeting
and
hopefully
move
forward
with
a
proposal
or
a
similar
proposal,
as
council
member
mayhem
has
suggested.
Thank
you.
Bye.
A
A
Eva
has
to
update
her
zoom.
Okay,
eva.
You
need
to
sign
off,
update
your
zoom
and
then
sign
back
on.
I
have
nine
other
hands
up,
so
you
should
have
enough
time
to
get
back
on
edwin
moreno.
N
N
This
year
alone,
I've
had
to
make
several
calls,
because
we
had
individuals
on
our
site
who
were
under
the
influence
of
drugs,
trying
to
get
violent
or
physical.
With
some
of
our
staff
members
and
some
of
our
students,
there
was
a
situation
where
there
was
indeed
an
exposure
involved,
and
so,
as
someone
who's
in
charge
of
student
safety.
This
is
a
big
concern
for
me
and
I'm
starting
to
know
that
the
county
is
currently
releasing
individuals
who
have
committed
serious
crimes
or
crimes
that
have
historically
escalated
to
murder,
rape
or
other
serious
offenses.
N
Many
individuals
are
released
back
into
our
streets
and
after
having
robbed
a
store,
committed
domestic
violence,
lewd
behavior
or
drug
possession,
they're
released
on
the
promise
that
they
will
appear
in
court,
never
to
return
and
revolving
and
the
revolving
door
just
continues.
So
the
county
must
collaborate
with
the
city
and
the
san
jose
police
department
to
ensure
that
dangerous
individuals
are
kept
off
our
streets
and
that
we
apprehend
and
detain
those
who
have
active
warrants
for
failing
to
appear
in
court.
Many
tragedies
could
be
avoided
this
way.
N
O
Hello
good
afternoon
my
name
is
alejandra
and
I'm
a
resident
of
san
jose
in
district
seven,
I'm
also
a
mom
of
an
eight-year-old
girl,
and
I
work
at
a
high
school
in
the
east
side
of
san
jose.
I'm
calling
in
support
of
council
member
mayhem's
public
safety
memo.
Our
city
has,
unfortunately,
seen
a
rising
crime
in
recent
years,
and
yet
our
jails
are
still
sitting
at
half
capacity.
O
It
doesn't
make
sense
for
the
county
to
release
known
criminals
into
our
communities
as
a
mom.
I'm
saddened
to
know
that
the
county
is
currently
releasing
individuals
who
have
committed
serious
crimes
or
crimes
to
have
historically
escalated
to
murder,
rape
or
other
serious
offenses.
Many
individuals
have
released
back,
are
released
back
into
our
streets
after
being
having
robbed
a
store
committed
to
domestic
violence,
lewd
behavior
or
drug
possession
they're
released
on
a
promise
that
they
will
appear
in
court,
never
to
return
and
the
revolving
door
continues.
O
The
county
must
collaborate
with
the
city
and
sapd
to
ensure
that
dangerous
individuals
are
kept
off
of
our
streets
and
that
we
apprehend
and
detain
those
who
have
active
warrants
for
failing
to
appear
in
court.
Many
tragedies
could
be
avoided
this
way,
please
support
council
member
mayhem's
memo
and
keep
our
community
safe.
Thank
you.
O
Hi
everyone
becky
garcia
san
jose
resident,
I'm
calling
in
support
of
council
member
mayhem's
memo.
I
have
a
daughter
who
works
retail
and
I
regularly
fear
for
her
safety,
especially
when
she's
dealing
with
people
who
are
dangerous
to
themselves
and
others,
or
you
know
repeated
shoplifters
who
are
getting
more
and
more
bold.
O
So
you
know
it
would
be
great
if
there
is
a
way
that
we
can
stop
violent
offenders
or
offenders
who
have
the
huge
potential
to
become
violent
and
keep
them
up
our
streets.
I
also
hope
to
see
improved
rehabilitation
programs,
whether
this
includes
vocational
or
substance
abuse,
but
programs
that
truly
work
and
help
these
people
not
become
repeat
offenders.
So
we
don't
just
put
a
band-aid
on
the
issue.
A
Yeah
good
afternoon,
I'm
calling
in
support
of
council
member
mayhem's
memo
regarding
this
subject.
I'm
on
the
board
of
directors
of
the
santa
teresa
foothills,
neighborhood
association
and
one
of
the
things
we
hear
most
from
our
membership
is
the
decrease
in
the
quality
of
life
due
to
a
lot
of
these
crimes
being
committed
in
their
neighborhood,
larceny
and
vandalism,
and
talking
to
our
local
police
on
the
beat
it's.
A
So
this
is
not
something
that
is
where
we're
in
favor
of,
and
we
would
like
some
change
in
how
things
are
operated
with
the
county
and
point
out
that
the
recent
home
depot
fire
was
probably
one
of
the
most
egregious
examples.
It
turns
out
that,
as
most
of
you
probably
know,
it
was
arson
and
that
the
person
who
set
the
fire
was
somebody
who
had
been
arrested
repeatedly
in
recent
years,
but
yet
was
out
on
the
street.
So
again,
I'm
calling
in
support
of
the
memo.
Thank
you.
E
P
P
Our
city
has
unfortunately,
seen
a
rise
in
crime
in
recent
years,
and
not
just
our
city
but
also
district
8
in
my
neighborhood,
and
I
am
deeply
concerned
about
the
constant
car
break-ins
in
my
just
in
my
street
alone,
public
drug
use
in
even
in
front
of
my
house,
home
break-ins
or
invasions
traffic
accidents
that
are
going
going
out
of
control
just
here
in
this
area
and
my
family,
and
I
are
worried
every
time
we
leave
our
home
for
fear
of
break-ins
and
also
as
a
mother
of
two
young
adult
women.
P
I'm
also
really
scared
for
their
safety
when
they
come
to
and
from
their
work
to
home,
and
so
I'm
just
asking
for
this
this
this
committee
to
please
please
support
this.
P
This
memo,
and
and
and
even
offer
some
solutions
to
do
when
you
are
releasing
these
offenders
to
do
it
in
a
very
responsible
manner,
where
you're
always
putting
public
safety
first,
whether
it's
offering
rehabilitation
services
for
substance,
abuse,
mandatory
and
mental
health
services
for
some
of
these
offenders,
if
they
need
it
and
even
community
service
hours
or
there's
so
many
other,
so
many
so
much
data
that
has
been
proven
to
work
that
we're
not
even
using
in
this
county,
and
so
I
would
really
like
for
this
to
be
done
in
a
very
responsible
way
and
where
accountability
is
number
one,
but
also
your
public
safety
is
is
always
that
top
of
mind.
P
If
you
need
to
find
more
information,
all
of
you
hold
community
meetings
in
your
districts,
and
you
listen
to
your
your
constituents.
Please
listen
and
do
something
about
this.
It's
it's
really
concerning
to
many
of
us
who
have
children
who
work
in
schools
and
listen
to
our
students,
pain
and
anxiety
over
crime.
A
M
Hello,
my
name
is
greg
trapp,
I'm
a
50-year
resident
of
the
city
of
san
jose
and
I'm
a
retired
san
jose
police
officer,
and
I
remember
the
days
when
san
jose
was
known
as
the
safest
large
city
in
the
united
states.
We
were
proud
of
that.
The
reason
it's
changed
is
criminals
know
that
there
are
not
consequences
in
the
city
of
san
jose
anymore.
M
We
have
repeat
offenders
that
get
out
as
a
police
officer.
When
I
was
hired,
we
knew
that
10
percent
of
the
population
would
be
90
of
our
work.
I
think
those
numbers
have
probably
changed,
but
it's
still
a
small
percentage
of
the
population
that
causes
the
most
crime
to
release.
That
percentage
back
into
the
into
the
neighborhood
into
the
communities
is
not
safe.
It's
not
healthy
and
that's
why
people
in
san
jose
are
afraid
to
go
out
in
public.
M
The
city
of
san
jose
needs
to
do
whatever
it
can
and
it
needs
to
pressure
the
county
to
do
whatever
it
can
to
hold
those
that
break
the
law
responsible
for
what
they've
done.
There
have
to
be
consequences.
We
have
to
stop
this
no
bail.
We
have
to
stop
the
release,
we
have
to
stop
the
revolving
door,
and
this
is
one
step
to
do
that
and
I
am
support
of
the
memo.
Thank
you.
A
A
A
A
A
I
encourage
the
city
council
ruth
committee
to
direct
the
city
manager
to
decide
which
category
of
repeat
offenders
the
san
jose
pd
should
direct
the
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
re
arrest
offenders
recently
authorized
by
city
council.
This
is
a
step
that
will
indicate
the
council
concern
for
public
security
and
the
responsibility
of
accountability
too.
A
Q
Okay,
so
one
more
time
so
thanks
god
that
I
trying
to
do
my
best
also
in
english,
but
I
feel
more
comfortable
in
my
own
language.
So,
first
of
all,
I
request
to
have
every
meeting
translation
and
then
yes,
I'm
support
the
memo
for.
Q
Console
and
safety
personally
I
work
in
a
shopping
mall
for
20
years,
and
I
see
the
the
crime
around.
I'm
scared
and
things
got
like
just
sweet
job,
but
my
daughter,
which
is
only
16,
she's,
still
doing
that
job
as
a
part-time.
As
a
student,
I'm
worried,
I
just
hear
in
the
news
couple
weeks
ago
about
the
segway
killing
a
young
man
and
I
really
feel
sorry
for
them.
I'm
a
mom,
I'm
on
a
I'm
afraid.
I
had
two
daughters.
I
had
to
teach
it
how
to
take
care
of
themselves.
Q
Even
you
know
cross
the
street
because
it
is
not
safety
anymore.
I
asking
to
support
that
memo.
I
asked
him
to
call
the
community
hold
meetings
and
public
meetings,
so
everybody
can
participate
and
give
us
our
opinion.
Yes,
and
I
know
as
an
immigrant,
I
know
this
is
gonna-
be
a
it
might
be
as
scary,
but
we
have
to
work
together.
This
is
the
centaurio
san
jose
community
and
then
yes,
I
support
that,
and
I
say
just
please
hold
meetings
for
the
community,
so
everybody
can
participate.
R
Yes,
good
afternoon,
I
hope
you
can
hear
me
I
am
in
support
and
I'm
urging
the
council
to
pass
councilman
mann's
memo,
I'm
looking
at
this
from
a
similar
size
as
everyone
else.
However,
I
did
previously
work
in
the
men's
jail
downtown
in
booking,
where
I
personally
have
seen
gentlemen
released
and
then
I'm
rebooking
them
on
the
same
shift
for
the
similar
crimes
in
the
past.
R
I
think
people
felt
safe,
which
they
no
longer
feel
because
it
is
now
affecting
everyone
in
the
past.
You
would
read
about
crimes
and
think,
oh,
my
goodness,
I'm
so
glad
I
don't
live
near
there,
but
now
everyone
is
being
affected,
no
matter
where
they
live
and
people
are
not
being
held
accountable,
and
I
don't
think
that
there's
necessarily
enough
employees
to
supervise
people
that
are
being
released.
R
So
I
urge
this
memo
to
be
to
be
passed
and
the
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
be
used
to
help
hire
people
just
for
people
that
are
out
on
ftas
and
show
them
that,
yes,
they
cannot
just
walk
away
from
their
date
in
court
that
we
will
hold
them
accountable.
Thank
you.
A
I
Yes,
yeah,
I
would
like
to
speak
in
favor
of
mr
hate
mayhem's
memo,
for
several
reasons.
One
is
is
that
I
often
see
reports
on
something
called
next
door
where
people
have
feelings
of
helplessness
because
of
the
crimes
that
consistently
happen
in
their
neighborhoods.
I
My
wife
and
I
have
been
leaders
of
the
ministry
of
our
church
venture
christian
church,
which
reaches
out
to
children
and
teens
that
are
in
the
area
of
you,
know
poor,
family
and
other
things,
and
they
often
end
up
in
in
crimes.
I
Despite
our
efforts
to
help
them
see
that
they
don't
have
to
join
gangs
and
things
like
that,
but
they
can
achieve
in
school
and
things
like
that
and
have
a
better
future
and
the
one
of
our
failures
is
a
young
man
who
is
currently
in
prison
for
robbery
and
stealing
a
car
armed
robbery,
and
he
is
somewhat
repentant
of
his
situation
and
has
about
a
year
or
so
to
go
and
he's
hoping
that
he
will
be
able
to
have
support
when
he
gets
out
in
the
community
to
not
repeat
his
his
criminal
activities,
and
his
he's
shared
some
thoughts
with
me.
I
One
is
is
that
the
there
needs
to
be
some
method
of
showing
the
people
who
are
repeatedly
doing
the
crimes
that
they
are
going
to
be
held
accountable
like
he
has
been,
and,
and
it's
not
enough
to
release
somebody,
because
their
crime
is
only
less
than
a
few
dollars.
A
A
B
S
Thanks
vice
mayor,
I
appreciate
that
hi
everybody.
I
want
to
thank
all
the
community
members
who
took
the
time
today
to
come
out
and
share
their
personal
experiences
and
their
perspective
on
some
of
the
public
safety
issues
that
that
we
face.
I
know
you
all
had
a
pretty
lengthy
conversation
with
mayor
lucardo
about
eight
weeks
ago
about
a
much
more
detailed,
larger
group
memo
that
he
and
I
and
councilmember
carrasco
worked
on
together.
So
I'm
not
gonna
in
the
interest
of
everyone's
time.
I'm
not
gonna
rehash
that.
S
That's
there
because
the
earlier
one
was
a
bit
broader,
and
I
fully
appreciate
that
some
of
the
things
that
I
was
asking
for
there
would
be
more
appropriately
handled
during
the
joint
study
session
that
I
believe
you
all
decided
eight
weeks
ago.
We
should
move
forward
with
the
county
and,
I
believe,
is
now
being
scheduled
for
the
fall.
S
So
that's
that's
great
to
today,
with
the
revised
memo
before
you,
I'm
I'm
really
here
with
two
very
targeted,
very
narrow
and
concrete
recommendations
that
I
at
a
minimum
like
to
see
us,
discuss
it
at
our
next
council
meeting
and
hope
that
we
can
move
forward
prior
to
the
joint
study
session
that
we've
contemplated
having
with
the
county.
So
let
me
just
quickly
say
what
those
two
things
are
and
then
I'd
love
to
hear
from
leonora,
since
we
don't
have
an
early
consideration
form
for
those
items.
S
What
their
capacity
looks
like
so
the
first
very
specifically,
as
you
all
know,
is
we've
all
agreed
through
our
budget
process
that
our
police
department
ought
to
spend
a
little
more
time
and
energy
rearresting
high
risk,
repeat
offenders
who
have
failed
to
appear
in
court.
I
think
we
all
acknowledge
the
public
safety
risk
there
and
that
was
unanimously
passed
through
the
budget
process,
not
just
as
direction
but
also
some
additional
funding.
That's
the
300
000
that
I've
referred
to
here.
S
S
I
think
you
know
repeatedly
filling
a
leaky
bucket
is
not
a
great
use
of
anybody's
time,
and
our
police
department
has
many
more
important
things
to
do
than
pick
people
up
simply
to
have
them
released
the
same
day
and
then
not
appear
for
their
day
in
court.
So
I
think
we
need
to
collaborate
with
the
county,
and
I
don't
think
that
there
is
any
reason
for
for
us
to
wait
for
a
joint
study
session
to
just
get
some
clarity
around
the
rules
of
the
road.
S
But
frankly,
today
we
don't
have
that
which
is
part
of
why
we
are
spending
a
lot
of
time
arresting
folks
who
we
think
ought
to
be
in
jail
and
then
discovering
that
they
are
right
back
out
the
next
day
or
the
same
day.
So
that's
that's
point.
One
is
just
getting
that
alignment
and
clarity
around
which
of
the
folks
who
we've
already
allocated
funds
now
to
go
apprehend
are
actually
worth
spending
our
time
apprehending
and
hopefully
we
can
get
some
alignment
there.
That
would
be
a
step
forward
incrementally
before
the
joint
study
session.
S
The
second
recommendation
is
for
city
attorney
and
her
team,
which
is
in
the
process
of
researching
the
many
facets
of
these
issues.
You
know
our
run
out
group
has
discovered
that
the
the
state
constitution
makes
very
clear
that
decisions
about
pre-trial
release
ought
to
be
solely
made
at
the
discretion
or
exclusively
made
at
the
discretion
of
the
courts.
Judges
and
yet,
since
the
beginning
of
covid,
we've
seen
a
delegation
of
authority
to
an
administrative
level,
which
I
think
is
really
part
of.
S
Why
we're
seeing
inconsistency
and
a
high
rate
of
pre-trial
release
and
then
reoffense
and
failure
to
appear,
and
I
think
it
would
behoove
us
as
a
city
prior
to
the
joint
study
session,
have
the
city
attorney
and
her
team
do
a
little
research
on
whether
or
not
this
is
a.
We
believe
this
is
a
lawful
delegation
of
powers
and
what
what
recourse
we
might
have.
Obviously,
this
is,
first
and
foremost
a
huge
public
safety
question
for
our
community.
S
S
We
basically
do
some
prevention
work
and
then
we
do
law
enforcement
through
our
police
department
and
we
need
to
make
sure
the
rest
of
the
system
is
actually
meeting
us
halfway
and
functioning,
and
I
know
we're
gonna
have
a
much
broader
conversation
at
the
study
session,
but
I
think
going
into
that
meeting,
it's
really
important
that
we
have
our
own
independent
legal
analysis
of
what's
currently
happening
and
have
a
discussion
at
the
council
as
to,
and
that
probably
ought
to
be
within
closed
session.
S
What
the
city
attorney's
assessment
of
that
practice
is
and
whether
or
not
it's
lawful
and
sort
of
know
what
our
what
our
options
and
leverage
may
be.
I
think
the
city
and
county
are
still
not
on
the
same
page
and
doing
our
own
independent
analysis
prior
to
that
meeting
is
pretty
important.
S
So
that's
what
the
two
are
and
since
the
early
consideration
form
refers
to
an
earlier
version
of
the
memo,
maybe
I
could
just
ask
lee
and
nora
if
they
can
share
anything
about
their
capacity
and
their
work
plans
and
whether
or
not
this
fits
and
and
then,
if
we
have
paul
joseph
for
a
representative
from
the
police
department
on.
C
Thank
you,
councilmember
yeah
and,
in
all
honesty
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
for
the
text
message
about
15
minutes
ago.
I
was
not
aware
that
there
was
a
replacement
memo
or
revised
memorandum,
I'm
not
exactly
sure,
what's
happening
with
the
notification
system,
so.
C
So
I've
been
able
to
read
it
really
quick,
you
know
and
just
to
clarify
you
know
the
your
original
memorandum
had
some
you
know
policy
meet
on
it,
and
so
that's
why
we
recommended
the
already
kind
of
scheduled
meeting
for
his
fizz
and
the
counties.
This.
I
forget
the
committee
name
of
it.
I
think,
with
the
revised
memorandum
on
number
one,
that's
work
that
we're
already
doing
have
a
meeting
with
the
county
next
week
on
a
variety
of
issues,
and
this
was
part
of
that
request.
C
We
obviously
before
we
go
start
spending
money
that
you
authorized
on
july,
1
we're
going
to
try
and
be
super
efficient
and
strategic
with
that
use
of
money.
So
from
from
my
perspective
from
city
manager's
office
number
one
is
a
green
light
because
that's
work
that
we're
already
doing
and
assistant
chief
joseph
and
I
have
been
in
contact.
S
C
You
know
we're
happy
to
do
something
via
info
memo
if
you'd,
like
sure
you
know,
I
don't
know,
if
it'll
be
one
meeting
or
two
meetings
to
flesh
that
out
or
if
the
county
needs
time.
So
I
would
like
some
flexibility
on
like
the
time
commitment
and
then
before
handing
it
off
to
nora
on
number
two.
I
would
just
say
you
know
the
the
new
revised
memorandum.
I
don't
think
you
need
to
afford
it.
C
The
I
would
just
suggest
to
the
rules
committee
that
you
don't
need
to
afford
it
to
the
full
council,
at
least
on
number
one.
It's
a
green
light.
You
give
us
workload,
analysis
all
the
time
on
green
lights
to
go
out
and
do
this
work.
So
I
know
that
there's
a
mechanism
to
report
back
in
close
session
for
nora
and
would
defer
when
she
wants
to
do
that,
based
off
of
the
the
legal.
G
S
That
was
my
thought
is
that
I
understand
there's
a
lot
of
broader
conversation,
we're
gonna
have
during
that
that
joint
study
session.
I
think
these
are
very
targeted,
concrete
places
where
we
need
more
information
before
that
study
session.
I
believe,
and
I
think
that
would
empower
us
to
both
better
spend
the
dollars
we
just
allocated
on
recommendation
one
and
help
our
police
force
be
more
effective,
but
then
on
number
two
make
sure
we
go
into
that
study
session.
Understanding
your
analysis.
G
All
right:
well,
we
can
bring
it.
We
can
do
the
work,
we're
going
to
need
to
do.
As
you
know,
when
july,
when
council
leaves
in
july,
the
building
pretty
much
clears
out.
Also,
so
I'm
gonna
have
a
lot
of
people
on
vacation,
but
but
we'll
be
able
to
get
this
to
close
session
at
some
point
before
that
study
session
for
sure.
S
Okay,
great,
thank
you
so
much
and
then
deputy
chief
joseph,
I
don't
know
if
you
wanted
to
chime
in
at
all
on
just
kind
of
the
the
value
of
having
this
analysis.
T
Sure,
thank
you,
council
member.
I
I
definitely
agree
that
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
try
to
go
out
and
arrest
people
who
are
failing
to
appear
in
court
who
have
warrants
for
their
arrest,
who,
I
would
agree
with
you
are
contributing
to
the
overall
issues
of
crime
that
we're
seeing
in
our
city.
If
those
people
are
simply
going
to
be
issued
a
new
court
date
and
never
spend
any
more
time
in
custody,
it's
it's
a
source
of
great
frustration
for
our
officers
and
clearly
for
the
community
as
well.
T
We
hear
it
often
so
I'm
I'm
looking
forward
to
participating
in
the
study
session,
I'm
looking
forward
to
hearing
from
the
the
engineers
of
this
program
as
to
you
know
whether
or
not
they're,
even
aware
of
some
of
the
consequences
of
these
releases
and
how
we
can
work
towards.
You
know
not
saying
that
everybody
needs
to
be
in
jail,
but
the
people
that
are
are
contributing
mightily
to
our
increase
in
crime
who
are
being
arrested
almost
on
a
monthly
basis,
some
of
them.
T
These
are
the
people
that
just
need
to
be
in
jail.
Unfortunately,
and
maybe
maybe
a
more
lengthy
stay
will
help
them
get
the
the
services
and
the
resources
they
need,
so
that
they're
not
reoffending,
but
but
clearly
that's
not
happening
right
now.
S
Yeah
exactly
okay,
great
well,
thank
you,
and
vice
mayor,
at
least
for
now
that
was.
That
was
all
I
had
thanks
for
the
opportunity.
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
perales,.
H
Yeah
thanks,
I
hadn't
seen
the
updated
memo
either
and,
and
so
was
wasn't
aware
that
there
was
a
ship.
So
I
appreciate
the
kind
of
on-the-fly
discussion
here
about
where
that
shift
may
be,
because
I
I
definitely
was
getting
a
sense
of
deja
vu
with
the
memo
and
then
the
public
comment
on
where
we
have
already
directed,
and
we
have
a
date.
It's
not
solidified,
but
early
september
september.
H
8Th,
is
what
we're
looking
at,
and
so
you
know,
I
think,
we're
we're
set
to
have
that
discussion
with
the
appropriate
partners
in
the
room
because,
as
I
think
we've
mentioned
last
time
and
as
was
highlighted
again
this
time
we're
talking
about
something
that
is
not
within
our
jurisdiction.
H
You
know
early
release,
or
you
know
the
the
some
of
the
shifts
and
changes
that
were
made
during
the
pandemic,
with
the
county
having
more
authority,
but
also
it
is
a
bit
of
a
a
mixture
still
where
the
court
system
and
judges
still
have
a
lot
of
leniency,
and
certainly,
as
it
shifts
back
to
that,
it
becomes
even
more
unclear
honestly
on
you
know
who
or
or
when
somebody
gets
released
or
if
they
get
you
know,
booked
at
all,
that's
something
that
that
we've
always
experienced
with,
because
judges
in
our
court
system
do
have
a
lot
of
leniency
in
in
that
regard,
and
so
I
think
the
you
know
that's.
H
That
was
why
we
had
redirected
this
conversation
before
to
a
joint
session.
So
that
way
we
could
have
the
appropriate
people
in
the
room
and
not
end
up
just
sort
of
speaking
in
our
own
silo
and
and
ultimately
not
get
the
answers
we
wanted
or
not
understand
what
more
could
be
done.
So
that
is
happening,
and
I
look
forward
to
that
discussion
as
it
comes
forward.
It
sounds
like
the
recommendation.
H
The
new
new
recommendation
of
having
a
conversation
with
the
county
executive
in
their
in
their
office
there
is
is
already
going
to
happen
and
then
nora.
That
gives
you
some
time
in
august,
since
this
joint
session
will
be
september.
Hopefully
then,
right,
you
don't
have
to
worry
about
trying
to
scramble
in
july
with
staff
that
may
not
be
present
and
then
give
you
give
you
time
in
august
to
come
back
before
the
beginning
of
september,
with
a
a
closed
session
report
back
to
us.
H
So
I
I
don't
know
if
we
don't
need
a
motion,
obviously
to
direct
this
to
the
council.
I
don't
know
if
we
need
a
motion
at
all
for
either
of
those
things
to
happen.
Maybe
you
can.
Let
me
know.
C
G
Let
me
unmute
there
we'll
do
it.
So
if
you,
if
you
want
to
formalize
it
in
a
motion
you
can,
but
these
indicated
that
his
office
intends
to
do
the
items
in
number
one
and
and
I've
indicated
we'll,
do
the
items
in
number
two
and
bring
that
back
to
closed
sessions.
So
it
doesn't
need
a
formal
motion,
but.
H
Okay,
thank
you,
I'm
comfortable.
Without
it
I
will
say
it
was
a
a
bit
concerning
to
hear
our
community
members
and
for
those
that
are
still
speaking,
you
know
seem
to
have
a
bit
of
a
misunderstanding
on
the
authorities
in
jurisdiction.
I
would
say
a
small
handful
seem
to
have
a
grasp
that
you
know
we
are
simply
trying
to
have
some
leverage
here,
but
that,
ultimately
we're
not
making
these
decisions
on
these
release,
dates
or
who's
getting
held.
H
Those
are
out
of
our
jurisdiction
and
no
matter
how
much
the
council,
you
know
like
we're
doing
today,
putting
300
000
to
it
that
doesn't
change
that
fact
on
on
these
decisions
that
are
out
of
our
hands
today,
and
so
that's
where
that
joint
session,
hopefully
will
really
help
us
understand.
H
You
know
better
where
we
we
could
be
leveraging.
If,
if
it
is
indeed
you
know,
we
can
lobby
the
county
or
if
it's
need
to
at
the
state
level.
But
ultimately
it's
not
something
that's
in
directly
within
our
jurisdiction,
and
so
excuse
me
crying
child.
H
So
I
I
would
say
that
you
know
that
I
don't
want
people
to
have
the
wrong
impression
that
somehow
you
know
we're
going
to
be
able
to
affect
some
some
great
change
in
that
regard,
and-
and
I
also
think
it
was
a
bit
concerning
to
hear
that
you
know
the
fact
that
our
jails
are
not
full-
is
some
sort
of
bad
indication
right
or
that
there's
capacity
there
and
that
that's
an
answer
to
to
simply
utilize
the
capacity.
That's
in
the
jails
that
shouldn't
be
anybody's
interest.
H
It
certainly
should
be
all
of
our
interests
to
ensure
public
safety,
but
I
I
definitely
don't
think
that
it's
the
right
indication
that
that
that
would
mean
our
jails
being
full
is
a
good
indication
of
that.
So
just
some
concerning
comments
that
I
think
part
of
a
reality
of
some
misunderstanding
that
that
I
believe
I
heard
so.
I
look
forward
to
the
joint
study
session,
and
hopefully
we
can
have
some
better
clarity
as
that
moves
forward.
Thanks.
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
arenas.
F
Thank
you.
I
I
want
to
take
us
a
step
back
before
moving
forward
with
this
conversation,
I'm
really
confused
about
how
revisions
happen
to
rules
now
from
from
what
the
typical
process
is.
Is
that,
when
memo,
when
we
as
a
council
office,
need
to
submit
a
memo,
those
memos
are
due
by
thursday,
correct.
F
Okay,
so
they're
due
by
thursday-
and
I
believe,
that's
at
12.,
so
that
they
can
be
considered
for
the
following
week
if
the
agenda
so
permits.
So
I
had
read
the
memo
from
councilmember
mahan
on
friday,
which
is
a
completely
different
memo
than
the
one
that
has
been
submitted.
F
G
The
replace
the
committee
can
the
agenda
couldn't
be
changed.
The
committee
can
consider
the
memo
if
you
choose
to
and
you
can
you
can
determine
whether
or
not
you
want
to
send
it
on
the
council,
both
lee
and
I
have
indicated
that
it
doesn't
need
to
go
to
council
because
he's
already
starting
some
of
the
work
that
was
in
the
post
recommendation
and
for
us
for
my
office.
G
There's
the
the
subject
matter
is
the
same
between
the
two
memos:
it's
not
entirely
different,
but
there
is
direction
to
to
my
office
in
this
one
and
if
rules,
as
I
indicated,
if
rules
wants
to
formalize
the
consideration
of
that,
you
can.
But
we
voluntarily
agreed
to
bring
this
forward,
because
it's
information
that
the
council
might
want
to
consider
before
that
study
session,
so
we're
voluntarily
agreeing
to
bring
it
forward.
F
Okay,
so
the
the
the
what
was
approved
in
the
budget
is
to
take
a
look
at
how
to
rearrest
repeat
offenders.
That
seemed
to
be
the
focus.
F
It
was
a
one-time
funding
and
it
was
overtime
for
our
police
officers
to
focus
on
re-arrest
to
re-arrest
criminal
defendants
who
have
failed
to
appear
on
their
warrants
with
priority
given
to
those
defendants
who
face
the
most
serious
and
violent
felony
charges
that
have
been
previously
convicted
for
the
most
serious
and
violent
felonies,
and
allocate
funding
for
non-swollen
or
overtime
staffing
for
the
drafting
of
high
bail
affidavits
for
uniquely
dangerous
arrestees.
F
Now
this
is
what
the
council
voted
on,
and
this
is
in
diametric
opposition
and,
like
the
message,
is
completely
opposite
of
what
council
member
you
are
providing
today,
which
is
to
not
arrest,
repeat
offenders
and
a
lot
of
the
the
the
folks
who
called
in
today,
which
I
was
very
surprised,
probably
didn't
understand
that
you
had
a
revised
version
that
says
the
opposite
of
what
they
were
asking
for.
F
F
Excuse
me,
I'm
still
speaking,
so
what
so,
what
the
residents
have
been
calling
about
is
their
concern
about
exiting
from
from
a
job
late
hours
and
making
sure
that
those
folks
who
commit
sexual
crimes
or
kind
of
predatory
crimes
are
arrested
and
rearrested.
I
did
not
hear
not
once
somebody
say.
F
Actually
you
know
what
you
should
probably
spend
time
better
spent
for
our
police
officers
on
folks
who
do
not
get
re-released.
What
they
were
asking
for
is
for
us
to
detain
them
longer,
although
that
that's
not
our
our
job,
to
detain
them
longer
it's
outside
of
what
we
do,
but
that's
not
even
the
point.
F
The
point
is
that
what
the
council
voted
on
was
over
time
for
to
to
provide
overtime
for
police
officers,
to
re-arrest
folks,
who
are
repeat
offenders
now
your
memo
from
yesterday
or
on
the
21st,
I'm
not
sure
exactly
when
it
changed
says.
F
Obviously,
where
I'm
going
with
this
is
not
a
position
of
support.
It
is
impossible
for
our
police
force
to
give
me
enough
data
around
sexual
assault,
and
I've
been
working
on
on
this
area.
For
a
couple
of
years
now,
council
member
mayhem
you've
heard
just
last
week
how
I've
asked
for
additional
data,
and
it
was
it
was.
It
was
very
alarming
to
them
for
me
to
ask
that
on
an
ongoing
basis,
because
they
just
don't
have
the
analysts,
they
don't
have
the
resources
to
do
that.
F
Allegations
against
them,
since
they
are
the
the
folks
who
are
potentially
on
a
path
to
increase
the
severity
of
their
crimes.
As
we've
learned
from
active
shooters,
we
learned
from
the
stabbing
at
grace
church
we
learned
from
the
shooting
that
the
county
we've
learned
from
many
other
crimes,
even
the
ones
that
have
been
mentioned,
I
think
with
brandon
larson.
F
S
S
If
we
arrest
someone
who
is
released
the
same
day
and
that's
what
the
public
comment
was
much
of
the
public
commentary
today
was
also
about,
I
think,
we're
all
very
aligned
on
this,
and
I
suspect
you-
and
I
agree
the
the
point
here
is
that
we
need
some
clarity
from
our
counterparts
to
the
point
that
councilman
parole
has
made.
We
we
don't
have
jurisdiction
or
control
over
much
of
the
criminal
justice
system.
S
We
can
arrest
people
all
day
long
and,
if
they're
simply
put
back
on
the
street
the
exact
same
day,
we
haven't
actually
had
any
positive
impact,
and
so,
as
I've
been
working
with
our
police
department
and
community
members,
part
of
what
I'm
hoping
for
here,
I
think,
is
very
targeted
and
does
not
need
to
wait
for
some
joint
study
session
is
that
we
get
greater
alignment
with
the
county
around
who
they
are
willing
to
detain.
S
If
we
put
our
resources
into
a
resting
specific,
there
are
a
lot
of
high-risk
re-offenders
out
there
who
have
failed
to
appear.
I
want
to
make
sure
we're
arresting
the
ones
who
the
county
is
going
to
actually
detain,
because,
if
they're
released
the
same
day
back
with
the
community,
we
have
wasted
our
officer's
time
and
we've
made
the
community
not
at
all
safer,
and
so
I
am
hoping
that
when
it
comes
to
perpetrators
of
sexual
assault
and
other
violent
crime,
that
the
county
will
agree
to
change
direction
here
and
say.
S
Yes,
if
you
spend
the
effort
to
go
re-arrest
them,
we
will
detain
them.
And
that's
the
whole
point
here
is:
that's
not
what's
happening
today
in
many
many
cases,
so
I
think,
in
terms
of
the
notice
on
the
memo,
I
will
check
in
offline
with
the
clerk's
office
and
figure
out
why
that
didn't
happen,
and
I
apologize
for
that.
S
But
what
I've
basically
done
in
the
revised
memo
is
just
narrow,
the
scope
to
make
it
a
little
more
concrete,
but
I
don't
think
there's
it's
not
a
different
memo
or
a
different
direction
at
all.
I
think
we're
actually
saying
the
same
thing
here.
F
Well,
I
think
it's
a
predetermined
action
that
I
think
is
I'll,
be
honest
with
you.
I
I
would
prefer
to
have
a
conversation
with
our
county
counterparts
about
this
strategy,
and-
and
this
might
be
something
that's
already
in
the
works
it
sounds
like
lee-
is
already
working
with
establishing
this
conversation
with
with
our
county
folks.
F
This
might
be
very
well
be
a
a
good
strategy,
but
I
think
it's
pretty
in
the
cart
before
the
horse
to
determine
that
we
should
have
a
and
that
we
should
have
a
focus
on
the
kinds
of
arrests
that
we
will
want,
because
I'm
not
sure
what
those
arrests
are.
So
we
will
det
based
on
who
to
count.
F
F
So
I'm
not
sure
what
would
be
solved,
except
that
we
will
focus
on
arresting
folks
offenders
that
the
county
will
detain,
but
they're
already
arrested,
they're
already
detaining
them.
G
S
Which
is
the
the
the
point
of
this
is
to
not
wait
for
a
long
sprawling
meeting
at
some
time
in
the
future,
but
to
say,
hey
counterparts
in
the
criminal
justice
system.
We
have
some
additional
resources
for
police
overtime
to
go
re-arrest,
high-risk
offenders,
we're
going
to
have
to
make
some
decisions
about
how
we
deploy
those
resources.
S
S
We've
allocated
some
additional
resources,
we're
going
to
put
some
additional
police
overtime
effort
into
re-arresting
high-risk
offenders,
people
with
a
history
of
violent
crime
who
failed
to
appear.
We
would
like
a
commitment
from
the
county
that
you're
going
to
actually
detain
these
folks
rather
than
simply
booking
them
and
releasing
the
same
day.
I
mean
that
is
at
the
very
heart
of
the
problem
we're
discussing.
S
So
I'm
not
I'm
a
little
confused
about
where
the
disagreement
is.
I'm
I'm
thrilled
to
hear
that
lee
and
I
were
on
the
same
wavelength
and
that
at
least
on
recommendation
one.
We
were
already
doing
this,
so
it
sounds
like
we're
in
alignment,
and
this
is
pretty
common
sense
and
I'm
glad
to
hear
it.
I
I
was
not
aware
of
that.
Yet
what
I
did
not
want
to
do
is
have
us
wait
until
a
study
session
sometime
later
in
the
year
to
start
that
process.
S
I
think
we
ought
to
get
out
there
right
away
and
start
rearresting
high-risk
offenders,
but
I
think
to
do
that.
We
need
some
guarantee
from
the
county.
At
least
it
would
be
ideal
if
we
could
use
this
moment
of
leverage
to
get
a
commitment
from
the
county
that
they'll
actually
detain
them,
which
has
not
been
happening.
So
that's
that's
the
only
point
in
wreck,
one
I'm
not
sure
where
we're
disconnecting
there
or
where
the
disconnect
is,
but
that
that's
the
point.
F
Okay,
well,
let
me
read
your
your
memo.
F
Hold
on
now,
I'm
confused,
which
is
which
of
your
memos
hold
on
one
second,
so.
B
Hey
councilmember
arenas
while
you're
looking
that
up,
I
have
a
quick
question
for
councilmember
man
councilmember.
You
said
several
times
that
we
have
leverage.
What
exactly
is
our
leverage.
S
I
think
in
the
two
there
are
two
different
things
here
that
are
an
opportunity
for
us
to
to
continue
this
conversation
with
the
county
and
ask
them
to
do
to
play
the
role
that
I
think
many
of
us
hope
they
will
in
in
the
criminal
justice
system
and
and
dealing
with
the
revolving
door,
as
some
have
described
it.
The
the
first
is
that
we're
making
an
additional
commitment.
S
We've
done
a
budget
allocation
that
we've
approved
a
budget
allocation
that
says
we're
going
to
go
put
extra
resources
into
this,
because
we
want
to
highlight
that
this
is
an
issue
and
we
want
to
keep
the
community
safe
and
we're
going
to
make
a
commitment.
S
So
as
we
make
this
commitment
dear
partners
over
in
the
county
on
the
other
side
of
this
system,
that
we
jointly
manage
with
different
responsibilities.
And
would
you
also
step
up
your
commitment
by
giving
us
some
guarantee
that
if
we
go
rearrest,
high-risk,
repeat
offenders
who
have
failed
to
appear
that
you're
gonna
change
policy
a
little
bit
and
detain
some
of
them?
And
give
us
some
direction,
will
you
detain
them?
Who
is
there
a
bar
we
need
to
meet?
Is
there
is
there
information
we
need
to
provide?
S
How
can
we
work
together
here,
but,
let's
not
just
go,
spend
a
bunch
of
police
overtime,
arresting
people
who
are
going
to
be
released
the
same
day.
So
that's
that's
a
moment.
I
mean
that
is
a
moment
to
go
out
of
that
conversation,
it's
a
little
bit
of
public
attention
on
the
issue
and
us
stepping
up
our
commitment
and
that's
a
moment
to
have
that
conversation.
S
It
seems
quite
possible
that
the
new
process
by
which
our
county
is
administratively
deciding
who
to
release,
may
not
be
in
accordance
with
the
state
constitution
and
at
the
very
least
we
ought
to
go,
do
a
little
research,
and
before
we
go
into
a
study
session,
we
ought
to
have
a
perspective
on
that.
We
should
have
our
lawyers.
Take
a
look
and
say:
do
we
believe
that
this
is
lawful
because
there's
a
lot
at
stake?
We
heard
that
in
some
of
the
public
comment
we
hear
it
from
community
members
every
day.
S
Well,
then,
maybe
we
should
explore
some
legal
recourse
to
challenging
their
approach.
Now,
that's
a
ways
down
the
road.
I
mean
that's
research.
We
need
to
do
conversations
we
need
to
have,
but
I
am
not
in
favor
of
us
saying:
well,
we
don't
have
complete
jurisdiction
over
the
criminal
justice
system
and
public
safety
and
we
only
have
a
piece
of
it.
So
you
know,
let's
just
kind
of
wait
and
we'll
we'll
talk
to
the
other
elected
some
point
in
the
future
and
see
what
happens.
I
think
we
ought
to
develop
a
perspective.
S
Do
research
understand
the
law
and
really
have
a
good
handle
on
what
we
think
is
right
and
be
able
to
go
in
and
advocate
for
our
residents
and
that's
what
I'm
getting
at
here
and
I'm
trying
to
offer
very
concrete,
targeted
next
steps
before
we
have
that
study
session.
That
will
move
us
forward
and
it
sounds
like
city
attorney
is
very
comfortable
with
that
second
wreck
and
thinks
it
makes
sense.
S
So
I
I
don't
quite
understand
why
this
common
sense
approach
here
is
suddenly
getting
pushback.
I
don't
I
don't
quite
understand
it
sounds
like
we're
all
in
agreement.
Frankly,.
B
Yeah
and
you're
not
getting
any
pushback
from
me,
I'm
just
trying
to
understand,
particularly
based
on
my
seven
and
a
half
years
of
experience.
You
know
working
with
other
government
agencies
that
you
know
when
I
think
of
leverage
I
think
of
either
having
some
type
of
benefit
that
we
could
either
provide
or
withdraw,
or
some
type
of
punishment.
S
Well,
I
think
it's
a
benefit
for
us
to
spend
additional
dollars
in
our
officers
over
overtime
to
go
arrest,
high-risk
offenders
who
put
the
community
at
risk,
and
I
think
it's
a
threat
to
consider
whether
or
not
what's
being
done
is
lawful.
And
so
I
think
we've
got
a
carrot
and
a
stick
here,
both
of
which
are
targeted,
appropriate
concrete
things.
We
ought
to
move
forward
before
we
go
sit
down
and
have
a
study
session
with
the
county.
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
reyes,
did
you
find
the
information
you
were
looking
for.
F
Yes,
I
did,
but
it
seems
like
we're
talking
in
circles
here,
so
so
listen
I.
What
I
think
that
we
should
do
is
really
fall
back
to
your
original
memo
and
your
first
item
in
your
original
memo,
which
really
opens
up
the
conversation
and
doesn't
predetermine
the
strategy
with
the
county.
F
I
think
it's
it's
it's
a
good
idea
to
first
talk
about
sit
down
and
have
a
conversation
with
the
county
counterparts
and
for
staff
to
have
those
conversations.
I
don't
think
that
we
need
to
take
it
to
the
to
the
council.
Necessarily
I
just
don't
want
the
strategy
to
be
pre-determined,
which
it
already
lose.
You
know
we're
already
surmising
what
the
solution
is
versus
having
a
world
listening
session
with
our
our
county
counterparts
on
what
strategy
could
work
the
best
as
they
know
their
system.
F
You
know
you
said
you're,
not
a
lawyer.
Obviously
I'm
not
either.
I
and
I
don't
know
that
system
intimately
well,
so
I
would.
I
would
prefer
that
either
the
staff
have
a
level
of
conversations
to
help
guide
the
conversation
for
when
the
committees
meet.
I've
had
committee
meetings
with
joint
committee
meetings
with
the
county,
and
you
know
we
have
these
conversations
about.
F
What
are
your
objectives?
What
do
you
want
to
achieve?
How
can
we
do
that
together?
That's
part
of
this
collaborative
approach
and
to
have
a
pre-determination
about
a
strategy
to
me
doesn't
come
across
as
collaborative.
F
We
are
on
the
same
page
council,
member
mayhem,
because
I'm
just
as
invested
in
making
sure
that
repeat
offenders
are
behind
bars
and
that
and
that
they
don't
escalate
in
terms
of
their
crimes,
because
a
lot
of
those
the
times-
and
you
know
that
the
highest
number
of
crimes
happening
out
there
are
based
on
sexual
assault.
These
are
gender-based
crimes
and
it's
gender-based
violence.
F
That's
happening
out
there,
so
I
think
that
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
have
a
very
broad
conversation
before
we
predetermine
that
we
will
only
focus
on
those
folks
that
they
will
detain.
I
don't
know
that
we
have
any
leverage
over
the
county.
I
think
our
leverage
is,
it
is
only
that
they
want
to
meet
with
us
and
they
are
just
as
invested
in
in
finding
a
solution.
I
think
that
is
leverage
I
don't
think
establishing
a
strategy
ahead
of
the
conversation
is
going
to
lead
us
to
a
collaborative
approach.
F
Would
you
be
willing
to
broaden
your
your
first
item
back
to
and
default
it
back
to
what
you
had
stated
on
your
june
15
memo.
S
No,
I
I
think
that
the
original
version
is
appropriate
for
the
the
joint
step
session
and
I
think
we
totally
agree
there.
S
I
think
it's
great
that
our
our
deputy
city
manager
is
planning
to
ask
the
county
executive
to
actually
detain
folks
and
who
they're
going
to
detain
at
what
at
what
point.
At
what
threshold
will
they
detain
someone
who
we've
rearrested,
potentially
three
four
five,
I
mean
in
one
case
last
year,
19
times,
so
I
think
we
ought
to
ask
them
to
detain
folks
if
we're
going
to
put
in
extra
time
and
effort,
rearresting
them,
and
I
think
that's
a
pretty
simple
ask
it's
not
pre-determining
a
strategy.
It's
simply
saying:
let's
let
them
know.
F
A
proposal-
that's
a
strategy,
it
all
it's
one
in
the
same,
it's
one
in
the
same,
so
I've
asked
you
as
a
courtesy,
but
I
what
I'm
going
to
propose
is
to.
F
Replace
the
first
item
that
you
had
on
your
memo
with
the
memo
that
you
have
on
the
june
15th
item,
and
actually,
I
think-
and
I
want
to
hear
from
the
rest
of
my
my
colleagues.
I
think
that
what
we
need
to
do
is
consider
council
member
mayhem's
memo
from
june
15th.
I
think
this
second
memo
is
is
premature
and
that
it
it
very
well
could
be
the
direction
that
you
pose
for
the
joint
discussion.
F
I
I
just
don't
think
that
it
should
be
determined
now
but
anyways.
I
won't
make
that
motion,
but
I
do
want
to
hear
from
just
yet,
but
I
do
want
to
hear
from
my
colleagues.
B
Okay,
councilman
marinas-
I
don't
have
both
memos
up
in
front
of
me.
Can
you
just
explain
the
difference
again
but
talk
to
me,
like
I'm,
eight
years
old.
B
F
Oh
sorry,
I
was
talking
at
night,
I'm
I'm
behaving
like
I'm
eight
years
old
and
I
put
myself
on
me
and
started
talking.
Okay,
so
the
first.
So
the
first
item
of
his
council
member
mayhem's
memo
is
is
direct.
The
city
manager
to
convene
meetings
with
the
fcc
office
of
pre-trial
services,
the
district
attorney's
office
and
public
defender's
office,
santa
clara
county,
pretrial
and
presiding
criminal
judge,
santa
clara
county
sheriff's
office,
santa
clara
county
public
health.
F
And
department
and
other
relevant
county
stakeholders
to
define
criteria
for
considering
an
arrestee
high
risk
and
established
attention
protocols
for
high-risk
individuals,
apprehending
and
prohibited
by
the
san
jose
police
department.
The
focus
of
a
meeting
should
be
to
establish
criteria
for
identifying
high-risk
arrestees,
taking
into
account
the
severity
and
frequency
of
current
and
past
crimes
as
well
as
well
as
whether
there
is
a
history
of
failing
to
appear
in
court
and
protocols
for
detention
to
help
prevent
future
crime.
F
So
that's
the
first
item.
The
second
item
is
to
have
the
city
manager
return
to
council
in
september,
with
the
criteria
and
protocols
established
by
the
city
of
san
jose
and
our
partners
in
county
government,
including
an
update
from
the
san
jose
police
department
on
plan
utilization
of
funds
for
re-arresting
high-risk
individuals
from
the
300
000
approved
within
the
operating
budget.
F
So
that's
his
first
original
one
and
and
then
it
it.
It
evolves
to
the
first
one
being
direct
the
city
manager
to
determine
now
it's
determining
prior
to
spending.
Any
of
the
three
hundred
thousand
recently
authorized
by
the
council
set
for
san
jose
pd's
arrest
of
reoffending
pre-trial
defendants.
Whether
and
which
suspects
will
be
will
actually
be
kept
in
custody
upon
their
re-arrest.
F
The
city
manager
should
do
so
through
meetings
with
the
county,
executive,
sheriff
and
presiding
judge
of
the
superior
court,
including
the
office
of
pre-tel
services
and
department
of
corrections.
The
outcome
of
the
meeting
should
enable
the
city
manager
to
ascertain
to
which
category
of
repeat
offenders-
san
jose
pd
should
direct
its
scarce
resources
for
re-arrest
to
avoid
wasting
resources
on
the
re-arrest
of
defendants
likely
to
be
re-released
by
the
county
or
court
immediately
upon
booking,
and
then
the
second
part
of
this
is
is
to
determine
whether
it's
lawful
it's.
F
This
is
a
direction
for
the
city
attorney
and
it's
separate
from
what
he
asked
in
the
in
the
first
item
or
in
the
first
memo,
and
so
I
I
just
what
I
think
is
is
happening
is
there's
already
a
direction
for
our
city
manager.
F
To
to
focus
on
on
those
folks
who
the
county
will
detain
and
we're,
assuming
that
the
county
will
say
we're
we're
hoping,
I
think
that
the
hope
is
that
we
are
going
that
we're
going
to
have
this
conversation
with
the
county
and
we're
going
to
say,
listen
all
of
these
of
repeat
offenders.
That,
for
me,
would
be
sexual
assault.
Offenders
are,
I
think,
are
of
the
highest
risk
and
not
taken
as
seriously
as
they
as
they
should
be,
because
they're
always
released
back
into
the
community.
B
So
I'm
sorry
council
councilmember.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
so
your
desire
is
to
have
it
specifically
addressed
that
we're
talking
about
sexual
offenders
as
opposed
to
no.
F
F
So
my
worry
is
that
we
will
follow
the
the
pattern
that's
already
established
if,
if,
if
indeed
the
county
doesn't
want
to
do
anything
different,
if
they
can't,
if
they
legally
can't
detain
anybody
I.e,
for
example,
the
sexual
assault
offenders,
if
they
can't
do
it,
then
what
we?
What
hit?
What
councilmember
mahan
is
saying
that
we
will
focus
only
on
those
that
will
get
detained
and
that
won't
be
sexual
assault
offenders,
because
usually
they
get
re-released
into
the
community.
F
That
is
my
greatest
concern,
and-
and
at
this
you
know
at
this
venture,
I
don't
know
that
I'm
going
to
be
supportive
of
of
any
motion,
because
you
know
my
one
of
the
the
areas
that
I
think
that
always
gets
ignored
is
sexual
assault,
and
this
is
going
to
allow
for
that
to
continue
to
happen.
B
Okay,
thank
you.
Councilmember.
I'm
gonna
ask
lee
for
an
assist
lee.
You
know
with
all
this
feedback
that
we're
getting.
Is
there
any
way
to
to
reconcile
what
councilmember
reyes
and
what
councilmember
ray
mahan
want
to
to
accomplish.
C
Sorry,
I'm
smart
enough
to
mute
myself.
I
do
think
councilmember
uranus
makes
a
very
good
point.
I
will
say
the
way
I
read
recommendation.
One,
however,
is
that
we're
directed
to
ask
the
county
who
they're
likely
to
keep
detained.
It
is
not
a
policy
or
an
operational
recommendation.
Nor
could
the
council
member
make
an
operational
recommendation
on
how
we
actually
implement
a
program
on
how
we
spend
the
300
000.
C
However,
so
as
we
move
forward-
and
you
know,
the
assistant
chief
is
happy
to
speak
to
it,
one
of
the
things
that
we
will
do
as
we
go
to
embark
on
this
is
to
ask
this
question
of
the
county.
Who
are
you
likely
to
detain
and
who
are
you
likely
to
keep
in
from
a
so
from
an
efficiency
standpoint?
C
C
We
base
it
off
a
lot
of
different
things
and
I
think
to
council
member
arrange
this
point.
You
know
what
I
want
to
figure
out.
You
know
when
we
passed
the
budget,
we
said
violent
and
serious
felonies.
That's
a
broad
category
and
I
would
absolutely
believe
that
sexual
assault
is
in
there,
and
so
you
know
part
of
the
meeting
you
know
that
we
wanted
to
have
was
to
make
a
case
for
those
who
be
included
quite
frankly,
because
I
think
we've
spent
a
lot
of
time
on
that.
C
If
this
is
a
lot
of
time
with,
you
know
a
counsel
with
that
and
have
a
deeper
understanding
of
it.
But
I
think
you
know
the
way
I
read
recommendation.
One
from
councilmember
mayhem's
memo
in
the
new
memo
is
literally
just
to
ascertain
that
information
from
the
county
to
help
inform
how
we
build
out
a
program,
but
you
guys
have
you
know,
given
us
the
direction
to
go
ahead
and
allocate
this
money
and
to
spend
it,
it's
our
job
to
figure
out
how
to
do
that.
C
B
Okay
and
and
chief
lee
said,
you'd
also
be
happy
to
speak.
To
as
well
are
you
are
you
happy
to
speak
to
it?
I.
T
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
arenas.
F
B
If
you
had
any
additional
comments,
councilmember
man.
J
J
Sort
of
say
that
I
think
the
conversation's
gotten
a
little
off
track,
and
I
think
this
is
kind
of
shows
the
importance
of
trying
to
make
sure
we
follow
a
procedure.
That's
laid
out
and-
and
I
think
with
you
know,
a
memo
that
was
submitted
and
then
edited
late
in
the
game
and
caused
confusion.
I
think
that
this
shows
why
we
should
be
following
the
process
of
having
a
memo
and
being
able
to
to
focus
on
that
specific
memo.
I
I
appreciate
what
I
heard
from
lee,
which
is
that
staff.
J
We
rightfully
trust
staff
to
implement
the
budgetary
decisions
that
we
make
as
a
council
and
sounds
like
staff
is
thinking
it
through
thought
in
a
thoughtful
way
and
we'll
ask
the
appropriate
questions
to
make
sure
that
that
what
we
do
isn't
wasted
money.
I
don't
think
anybody
wants
to
waste
our
money,
and
I
think
you
know,
as
councilmember
mahan
said
these
common
sense.
Things
are
obvious
to
most
of
us.
J
I
I
do
want
to
just
point
out
that
you
know
when
we
have
these
these
concerns
about
whether
or
not
the
money
is
being
spent
an
appropriate
way
or
how
how
things
are
going
to
be
implemented
that
it's
important
for
us
as
council
members
to
have
those
conversations
with
staff
before
submitting
memos
that
were
going
to
lead
to
these
kinds
of
back
and
forth
discussions.
Because,
as
I
heard
I
heard
you
say,
counselor
mayhem,
I'm
surprised-
or
I
didn't
know
that
I
didn't
know
you
were
planning
to
already
do
that
conversation.
J
We
really
should
know
that
and
that's
part
of
our
job
in
our
office
is
to
have
those
conversations.
So
you
know
I
feel,
like
I
don't
know
that.
There's
more
action
for
us
to
take
today.
I
think
we've
had
a
good,
thorough
discussion
and
heard
a
lot
of
input
from
fellow
council
members
about
the
kind
of
directions
that
we'd
like
to
take,
and
I
think
the
staff
should
take
that
back
and
take
action,
and
I
I
think
it's
time
to
move
on
in
the
agenda.
B
Thank
you
for
that
councilmember
cohen,
coming
here.
S
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think,
it's
time
to
move
on
as
well.
I'm
glad
to
hear
I'm
not
sure
why
we
had
so
much
debate,
I'm
glad
to
hear
that
we're
in
agreement.
The
second
wreck
is
new
was
not
planned
and,
I
think,
is
valuable
direction.
If
we
don't
need
to
vote
on
it,
that's
great,
I
think
the
so
I
do
think
that's
new.
I
did
hear
from
the
the
clerk's
office
that
there
was
a
mistake
in
not
circulating
the
new
memo,
so
that
happens.
S
It
was
a
revised
memo
that
did
not
get
circulated
so
occasionally
they're
going
to
be
mistakes
like
that
on
the
on
the
first.
I
think
it
is
worth
having
the
discussion
lee
mentioned
off
handedly
here
that
you
know
he
was
planning
to
integrate
a
discussion
of
this
into
his
next
meeting
with
the
county
executive,
which
is
great.
I
think
it
is
valuable
for
us,
as
council
members,
to
be
aware
of
those
kinds
of
conversations
and
have
a
perspective
on
how
we
are
implementing
policy.
S
We
may
not
be
determining
operationally
exactly
what
happens,
but
I
I
think
we
should
be
pretty
clear
that
rearresting
folks,
who
are
released
the
same
day
is
not
very
helpful
and
we
have
an
opportunity
here
to
go.
Make
that
pretty
clear
as
we
make
an
additional
investment,
that's
kind
of
a
unique
moment
and
a
unique
opportunity
for
us
to
do
a
little
bit
of
advocacy
with
the
county
to
try
to
move
them
in
the
direction
that
we'd
like
to
go.
And
I
don't
think
there's
anything
wrong
with
us
doing.
That.
B
Thank
you
and
before
we
go
to
council
member
pralls,
I
just
want
to
say
that
I'm
satisfied
with
the
lee's
direction
and
the
comments
that
he
made
incorporating
all
the
input
these
received.
So
I
just
want
to
say
that
that
satisfactory
for
me
to
move
forward
councilmember
perales.
H
Yeah
I'll
just
echo
your
comments,
I'll
say
ditto
on
that.
I
think
it
actually
was
really
helpful
to
have
the
understanding
and
perspective
of
councilman
red
and
us
on
sort
of
where
that
new
recommendation,
one
direction
could
have
taken
us
and
just
the
caution
that
she
provided.
That
says:
hey,
let's,
not
necessarily
go
out
and
predetermine
based
on
one
conversation
with
the
county
executive's
office
that
you
know
this
is
where
we
should
be
prioritizing
our
overtime.
You
know
300
000
overtime,
resources
on
arresting,
repeat
offenders
right.
H
So
I
I
actually
I'm
happy
that
we
had
this
conversation
and
sort
of
got
down
to
where
lee
responded
with
the
conversation
he'll
have
with
the
county
execs
office
to
get
an
understanding,
but
that
that's
not
necessarily
going
to
determine
exactly
how
we
roll
out
our
program
and
our
use
of
our
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
that,
ultimately
it
you
know
it
will
help
inform
us
before
our
joint
study
session,
which
I'm
comfortable
with
right
to
have
a
better
understanding
before
our
joint
study
session.
H
So
that
way,
if
we're
not
pleased
with
you
know
the
answer,
as
I
think
we
we
likely
aren't
and
councilmember
enes
is
described
as
well.
Right,
she's,
not
pleased
with
some
of
the
the
responses
from
the
county
on
who
is
being
prioritized
or
who
is
being
held,
and
I
think
so
that
will
help
better
inform
us
before
that
discussion.
H
I
am
also
comfortable
with
lee's
response
in
the
conversation
lee
that
you'll
have
with
the
county
executive,
so
I
I
don't
think
we
need
a
motion
to
move
forward.
I
think
we
have
the
clarity
and
look
forward
to
the
conversation
in
september.
B
Great,
thank
you
very
much.
That's
the
last
hand
raised
on
this
topic.
We
don't
need
a
motion
so
lee
you
have
your
direction.
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank
you
so
on
to
open
forum.
F
Really
last
minute,
I
just
want
to
make
I
and
thank
you
councilwoman
for
all
this.
For
bringing
that
point
back
up.
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that
with
because
there
isn't
emotion
on
the
floor,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
the
direction
that
is
taken
and
the
utilization
of
these
funds
are
spent.
F
I
don't
want
to
make
that
predetermination
because
that's
part
of
the
problem,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
our
sexual
assault,
the
sexual
assault
offenders,
are
targeted
in
the
same
way
that
the
rest
of
the
crimes
are
and
simply
because
they
are
not
detained,
does
not
mean
that
they
don't
get
rearrested.
F
When
we
have
additional
funding,
we
should
be
spending
it
on
the
crimes
that
are
out
there
and
that
we
don't
normally
talk
about
and
put
on
next
door,
because
sexual
crimes
are
full
of
shame
and
those
aren't
the
ones
that
are
listed,
but
they're
definitely
some
of
the
highest
statistics
in
our
city
that
are
impacting
young
women
of
color
and
and
young
men
of
color.
B
Thank
you
and
councilmember
mayhem.
I
see
you
have
your
hand
raised
again.
B
B
S
S
If
we
have
enough
hours
to
go
arrest,
an
additional
five
folks,
I
would
assume
we
would
all
agree
that
we
should
focus
on
ones
who
will
actually
be
attained.
I
think
I'm
sorry
detained
because
arresting
them
to
have
them
released
the
same
day
doesn't
actually
make
anyone
any
safer.
So
I
I
would
assume
anyway,
we've
said
a
lot,
but
I
didn't
I
don't
in
any
way
I
want
to
see
a
reduction
in
our
focus
on
going
after
perpetrators
of
sexual
assault.
So
I
very
much
agree
with
that
point
and
hope
that
that's
clear.
B
Duly
noted,
councilmember
paul's,
I'm
assuming
your
hand,
is
up
from
before.
B
D
D
I
hope
racial
equity
and
health
and
human
services
ideas,
its
guidelines
and
its
organization
can
still
be
considered
as
important
at
this
time,
rather
than
a
continued
over-reliance
on
law
enforcement
and
surveillance
tech
and
is
how
to
consider
the
needs
and
questions
of
law
enforcement,
surveillance,
tech
and
data
collection
in
the
san
francisco
bay
area
and
in
san
jose.
Even
as
we
are
trying
to
get
a
handle
on
current
crime
issues,
we
should
not
be
afraid
to
continue
to
openly
consider
our
better
ideals,
values
and
principles.
D
This
is
the
balance
and
purpose
of
this
new
era
of
reimagine,
and
from
this
I
hope
I
think
people
of
our
community
want
to
get
involved
and
and
they're
wanting
to
question
what
can
be
ideas
of
peace
and
not
war
and
not
harm,
and
they
want
to
work
in
these
good
terms
in
our
community
at
this
time.
Good
luck!
How
we're
trying
to
work
towards
those
goals
here
in
san
jose
and
in
the
bay
area
and
throughout
the
country,
and
good
luck
how
we
can
be
open
to
address
the
sro
issue
in
san
jose.
D
I
think
that's
an
issue
that
I
hope
can
remain
open
and
good
discussion
can
take
place
that
we
can
eventually
reduce
its
numbers,
the
future
of
the
military-industrial
complex.
I
think
we
can
really
address
that
in
law
enforcement
and
good
luck.
How
we
can
we
have
issues
of
crime,
it's
a
long
process,
but
we
need
our
good
ideals
to
talk
about
these
things
and
it
should
be
open,
subject
matter,
good
luck,
how
we
can
do
that
and
a
really
interesting
meeting
yesterday
on
the
future
of
district
1
issues
and
building
ideas.
B
All
right,
councilmember
reyes,
I
see
you
have
your
hand
raised.
B
All
right
well
we're
gonna.