►
Description
City of San José, California
Joint meeting of Rules and Open Government / Committee of the Whole, October 26, 2022
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be held at San José City Hall and also accessible via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=1007587&GUID=5F44C137-E9B7-420B-A58C-C0F257A3C2EE
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
B
C
D
C
Yeah
we
have
right
directly
after
consent,
calendar
and
right
now,
the
ad
sheets
on
the
screen.
So
for
anybody
interested
in
that
consent
item
we
have
the
study
session
agenda,
that's
to
occur
immediately
after
consent.
Calendar
Administration
expects
this
agenda
to
take
about
two
and
a
half
to
three
hours.
So
we
wanted
to
know
if
we
wanted
to
do
a
Time
certain
to
resume
the
council
meeting.
So
the
public
knows
when
to
come
back
for
the
regular
council
meeting.
D
C
We'd
have
four
to
about
4
30
to
5
is
when
the
study
session
would
end.
B
So
if
we
wanted
to
play
a
safe,
five
o'clock
would
probably
be
a
good.
B
C
D
B
Thank
you
Tony.
Before
we
have
a
discussion
about
the
breaks
and
time
certain
Rob
I
have
to
ask
you
about
load
balancing
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
going
to
have
overloaded
agendas
to
finish
out
the
year
and
I'm
not
doing
this.
For
myself
but
I'm
concerned
about
my
colleagues.
You
know
David
and
Deb
enrolled.
E
Well,
specifically
on
this
one,
if
you
would
be
coming
back
for
the
threes
and
the
agenda
for
the
remainder
of
11-1
is,
is
pretty
reasonable,
but
separately.
We
do
have
some
large
meeting
agendas
for
November,
29th,
December
6th
and
to
the
13th
those
meetings.
We
do
have
those
items
required
for
those
meetings.
There's
some
Grant
deadlines.
Some
report
back
to
council
before
this
Council
ends.
So
we
we
do
have
to
keep
the
stack
where
it
is.
E
I
apologize
for
the
busy
three
last
three
meetings
of
your
tender,
but
we
do
have
some
start
items
that
I
think
you're
going
to
be
really
interested
in
as
well.
D
B
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Rob
all
right
bring
it
back
to
the
well
actually
before
we
have
a
committee
discussion,
do
we
have
any
public
comments
on
the
side.
F
Hi
we're
Beekman
here
to
speak
to
the
November
1st
agenda.
In
summary,
you
want
to
talk
and
review
Concepts
around
covid
and
I
just
wanted
to
take
the
time
to
thank
yourselves
for
that
and
that
I
hope
it
can
be
a
good
session.
I
think
this
fall
in
winter.
You
know,
levels
might
not
be
a
tie,
but
we're
still
going
to
have
to
deal
with
covet
issues.
F
I
think
Mass
use
is
a
respect,
a
respectful
and
respectable
way
to
really
address
and
limit
the
the
spread
of
covid
and
that
we
shouldn't
be
afraid
of
mask
use.
So
much
and
I
hope
it
can
be.
A
conversation
way
to
have
conversation.
Mayor,
Newsom,
Governor
Newsom
is,
is
planning
to
end
emergency
practices
to
a
large
extent
by
next
February.
F
How
we
talk
about
that
I
hope
that
can
be
talked
about
next
week
and
how
we
work
this
this
winter
in
those
Concepts
and
I
guess
you
know
it
was
very
nice.
Yesterday
I
was
able
to
bring
up
the
IRP
report
or
IPR
IRP
reporting.
You
know
boy,
my
initial
worries
about
earthquake
preparedness
and
how
I
was
guessing
that,
based
on
IRP
stats
from
2020,
those
I
was
kind
of
proven
wrong.
I
feel
I,
I'm
learning
different
ways
to
read
the
IRP
reports
from
2020
that
really
questioned.
F
My
initial
thinking
and
I've
tried
to
apologize
to
yourselves
greatly
for
that.
It
was
very
nice
to
just
clear
the
air
with
that
yesterday,
but
it
was
at
the
same
time
we
had
a
really
large
earthquake,
so
this
stuff
is
always
nervous
and
we
do
always
have
to
be
ready
and
prepared,
but
I'm
always
ready
to
also
be
questioning
how
we
can
address
earthquake
preparedness.
Good
luck
in
those
efforts,
as
you're
doing
well
with
these
covet
issues.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you.
Based
on
the
conversation
we've
had
we
had
with
Tony
and
if
there's
an
anticipation
that
the
study
sessions
can
end
at
approximately
five,
it
probably
would
make
a
lot
of
sense
to
just
have
that
that
dinner
break
and
then
have
a
Time
certain
that
at
six
but
I'm
opening
it
up
to
my
colleagues
for
your
opinion.
G
Well,
I
would
just
ask
I
mean
if
we
don't.
If
we,
if
the
study
session's
over
earlier,
would
we
try
to
continue
some,
maybe
a
Time
certain
recess,
as
opposed
to
a
Time
certain
restart,
because
then
we
can
get
a
few
through
get
through
a
few
items
before
five,
potentially
that's
the
only
caveat
I
would
I,
don't
know
you
could.
C
Have
the
type
this
I
would
say
it's
a
Time
certain
restart
because
you
don't
know
exactly
when
you're
going
to
end.
You
don't
have
to
restart
at
six.
You
can
have
it
start
at
five
and
then,
if
you
end
up
going
past
five
with
the
study
session,
you
can
have
a
break.
You
just
wouldn't
be
able
to
start
before
five
times.
C
G
C
The
dinner
break:
that's
on
the
Fly.
You
guys
could
start
at
five
and
end
up
wanting
to
take
a
break
at
seven.
That's
not
a
an
issue
of
when
you
take
your
dinner
break.
So
if
you
want
to
do
like
a
start
at
five,
that
way,
members
of
the
public
know
will
come
sign
back
on
at
five.
It's
more
just
to
let
the
members
of
the
public
know
when
to
come
back
on.
D
E
And
just
for
staff
availability
vice
mayor
and
council
member,
the
if
we
could
do
something
of
the
the
break
and
start
of
the
threes
at
say,
536,
that
staff
would
know
to
be
available
and
they
would
all
be
prepped
to
come
back
at
that
time.
So
it's
a
little
easier
to
manage
on
that
side,
but
just
for
consideration.
D
H
Always
good
to
know
when
we're
gonna
eat,
because
the
mayor,
when
he's
here
doesn't
necessarily
always
think
about
that
and
I
do
and
I
and
I
do
think
it's
better
to
to
just
I
think
we
should
just
say
we're
going
to
restart
at
six.
That
way.
We
have
time
to
have
dinner.
Staff
knows
when
we're
going
to
come
back
and
they
don't
have
to
be
waiting
around
because
then
they
don't
have
to
worry
about
when
they're
going
to
have
their
dinner.
I
H
H
J
Sorry
I
was
waiting
for
our
vice
mayor.
To
give
me
public
acknowledgment
of
speaking.
K
J
Councilmember,
thank
you
so
just
to
confirm
this
would
mean.
Then
we
don't
really
start
the
regular
agenda
until
6
PM
correct,
which
is
starting
with
item
three
point.
One:
do
we
have
a
verbal
report
from
our
city
manager
that
we
know
of?
Is
that
going
to
be
some
other
way
happening.
E
J
J
J
You
know
what
that
might
look
like
for
the
duration,
I
guess.
Actually
it
doesn't
look
too
meaty
so,
but
I
was
just
conscious
of
the
fact
that
we're.
That
means
we're
not
really
starting
our
regular
agenda
till
six.
So
hopefully
we
could
provide
some
encouragement
that
that
you
know
the
the
commentary
lease
on
Armin
keeps
us
from
going
up
to
midnight.
We
haven't
had
to
hit
that
deadline
in
in
a
while,
but
I'm
assuming
we
may
start
to
push
up
against
it
as
we
hit
the
end
of
the
year
here.
Some
okay.
E
And
if
I
can
add
so
we
do
have
about
a
10
minute.
Presentation
expected
for
3.3
for
3.4
is
just
available
for
questions
and
then
correct
on
the
the
Cannabis.
One
being
probably
the
longer
item.
There's
no
presentation
plan
for
8.2,
but
availability
for
questions
as
well,
so
I
think
we'll
be
able
to
manage
within
time
yeah.
J
B
Thank
you
next
is
the
agenda
for
Tuesday
November,
8th
and
we're
gonna
start
on
pages
four
and
five.
B
F
L
Yes,
papa
from
the
Horseshoe,
well
I'm
glad
to
hear
my
counsel
being
very
conscientious
about
examining
the
agendas
you're
able
to
determine,
especially
somebody-
that's
been
here
for
two
terms:
you're
you're
pretty
much
able
to
determine
when
and
how
long
something
is
and
I
I
kind
of
take
kind
of
take
offense
at
the
use
of
the
word
controversy
when
in
actuality,
it's
democracy
in
action,
that's
what
it
is.
Democracy
is
confrontational.
L
Democracy
is
controversial
by
definition,
because
it's
the
power
of
the
people
challenging
the
government
that
has
derived
its
powers
from
the
consent
of
the
government
and
when
they
do
not
govern
properly
or
correctly
or
legislate
with
the
being
conscientious
about
the
needs
of
the
people
in
mind.
You're
going
to
have
some
pushback,
that's
democracy
and
so
to
use
the
word
controversy
in
its
place.
I
think
is
a
misnomer.
L
Secondly,
is
that
what
oh,
what
I
would
like
to
see
is
the
word
Equity
defined,
because
you
have
two
particular
items:
tax,
equity
and
fee
Equity.
Okay,
you
really
need
to
start
defining
what
that
word
means
within
this
context,
because
it
means
something
very
different
than
when
you're
using
it
within
the
context
of
a
racialized
issue
and
so
I
think
it's
very
irresponsible
for
this
Council
and
for
the
lawyers,
because
it's
the
attorneys
that
use
that
language
to
use
language.
L
That
is
very
inconsistent
and
confuses
people,
because
they
don't
really
understand
what
Equity
means,
within
the
context
of
the
of
the
of
the
policy
issues
that
you're
articulating
in
the
agenda
and
as
it
relates
to
racialized
issues
and
balancing
the
historical
books.
If
you
will
thank
you,
Blair.
F
I
wanted
to
quickly
comment
that
you're
having
an
item
about
approving
a
BTA
safe
parking
program
that
they
want
to
practice.
That
sounds
like
a
really
interesting
idea.
Thanks
thanks
for
being
involved
with
it
and
I,
guess
that
would
fall
under
City
government-sponsored
ways
to
help
be
unhoused,
I.
F
Think
it's
a
really
good
beginning
example
for
yourselves
in
that
way
of
working
and
I
hope
we
can
continue
those
efforts
and
want
to
look
even
deeper
into
City
government
and
non-profit
sponsored
of
of
unhoused
encampments
and
within
Lots
I.
Think
that's
the
idea.
I
hope
you
can
really
really
look
into
those
ideas
as
well,
and
thanks
a
lot
for
the
VTA
item
approval
process
in
a
few
weeks,
thanks.
B
Thank
you,
Rob.
This
agenda
is
very
very
light.
E
We
did
examine
if
we
could
accelerate
anything
from
especially
the
November
29th
meeting
or
December
6th,
and
we
didn't
identify
any
that
we
could
so
totally
respect
the
question
we
did
examine
but
we're
unable
to
move
everything
or
anything
to
accelerate.
E
Thank
you
and
just
one
clarification
I'm,
not
sure.
If
I
have
a
an
older
version
of
the
agenda,
but
on
8.1
it
is
Valley,
Transit,
Authority,
I
think.
B
B
Okay,
all
right
get
this
city
clerk
can
make
that
that
correction.
B
All
right,
I'll
entertain
a
motion.
Please.
H
J
B
So
Rob
uses
up
as
one
mistake
for
2022.
So
all
right,
we
have
motion
a
second
and
a
clarification.
J
B
F
Hi
Blair
Beekman
here,
I'm
gonna,
try
a
lot
for
this
item.
I
wanted
to
first
say
that
I'm
sorry
for
I
think
this
is
an
item
about
a
a
homecoming
events
and
lagging
to
the
Rotunda
for
San
Jose
State
coming
up
in
the
next
week
or
two
I
wanted
to
offer
my
condolences
that
I
think
a
person,
a
young
person,
maybe
a
freshman,
a
football
person.
He
who
was
writing
on
on
one
of
the
local
mobile
scooters
through
kind
of
the
East
Reed
neighborhood
area.
F
You
know
south
of
the
of
the
campus
was
killed
recently
and
he
was
a
kind
of
a
a
new
guy
and
he
was
kind
of
beloved.
You
know
everyone
was
liking,
the
guy.
So
it's
a
real
shame.
This
has
happened
and
just
a
reminder
that
you
know
that
we
have
to
really
take
care
and
when
we're
using
the
mobile
scooters
around
the
city
and
on
top
of
that
well
another
tough
one
here
that
yeah
with
the
events
at
San
Jose
State.
F
It's
kind
of
a
a
pattern
that
at
the
end
of
each
fall
semester
in
the
December
and
in
the
springtime
spring
break
and
at
the
end
of
the
spring
semester
in
May,
there
is
strangely,
like
one
or
two
shootings
in
that
East
area,
neighborhood
or
South
area.
Neighborhood
of
the
campus.
You
know
each
at
the
end
of
each
semester
and
I
figured
if
I.
If
I
mention
that
at
this
time
it
could
possibly.
M
F
I
know
I'm
going
overboard
here,
so
I'll
stop
there,
but
just
to
be
aware
of
it
and
to
note
it
good
luck,
how
you
can
do
that
and
thanks
for
your
time.
Oh.
L
Yes,
also
from
a
horseshoe
I,
don't
even
know
what
homecoming
means
I've
never
like
had
anybody
like
Define
like
what
is
a
homecoming?
What
how
do
you?
How
do
you
come
home?
I
I?
Don't
I've,
never
really
understood
that,
but
my
comments
are
restricted
to
the
lighting
of
the
Rotunda
in
response
to
people
that
have
attended
and
played
ball.
L
L
He
was
a
football
player,
he
played
ballpark
San,
Jose
State,
and
so
that
maybe
possibly
some
acknowledgment
of
that.
Some
acknowledgment
of
these
players
and
attendees
that
were
losing
to
accidents-
and
you
know
things
that
happen
in
their
lives
as
players
for
San
Jose
State,
that
that
particular
connection
be
something
that
is
acknowledged
publicly
within
the
context
of
this
homecoming
lighting
of
the
Rotunda.
L
It's
it's
very.
It's
very
sad
to
see
and
really
concerned
about
that
investigation,
because
what
the
city
has
been
able
to
do
as
a
bike
rider
is
a
lifelong
bike
rider
in
the
city.
You
guys
have
done
an
excellent
job,
excellent
in
creating
those
designations
and
very
delineating
the
streets.
So
it'd
be
really
interesting
to
see
how
that
turns
out.
But
I
would
like
some
acknowledgment
of
those
of
the
former
officer
and
player
for
Sunday
State
and,
as
Blair
stated,
the
current
loss
that
we've
incurred
recently.
Thinking.
D
B
C
B
Okay.
Next
item
is
actions
related
to
RVs
in
the
city
of
San
Jose.
This
is
a
follow-up
from
City
staff,
we'll
go
to
the
public
for
public
comments.
First,
calf.
C
Speakers
in
in
person,
as
well
as
on
Zoom
I,
start
with
the
in-person
speakers.
When
I
call
your
name,
please
come
down
the
microphone,
Gail
osmer
Patricia
and
it
looks
like
Pauline
Torres,
the
first
three
that
I'm
calling.
C
And
first
person
to
the
microphone
and
then,
if
so,
Patricia
and
Pauline
go
ahead
and
line
up.
M
Hi
excuse
me
good
afternoon.
First
of
all,
I
would
like
to
thank
vice
mayor,
Jones,
council,
member
Jimenez,
council,
member
Foley
and
council
member
Mahan
for
this
memo,
I'm
not
going
to
speak
long.
I
have
brought
some
of
my
folks
and
friends
from
Columbus
Park,
one
a
lot
of
them.
A
few
of
them
are
kind
of
nervous.
They've,
never
done
this
before
and
they're
coming
here
to
talk
about
living
in
RVs.
M
A
couple
of
things
that
you
have
mentioned
in
this
memo
is
that
RV
folks,
living
in
RVs
are
part
of
the
community.
I
know.
Maybe
some
of
you
don't
think
that,
but
they
are
they're.
Just
like
you
and
me,
and
this
park,
especially
at
Columbus
I,
know
we
want
to
put
other
things
there
like
dog
park
or
whatever,
but
these
are
people
and
they
need
to
be
treated
like
human
beings.
All
of
these
suggestions
are
wonderful,
I.
M
I
This
is
my
first
time
here
get
a
little
bit
emotional
I'm,
sorry
I'm,
one
of
the
residents
at
Columbus,
Park
I've,
been
there.
This
September
I
became
well,
no,
it
didn't
become.
It
turned
a
year
that
I've
been
there.
This
is
my
first
time
being
homeless.
I
I
have
an
RV
and
I
know
the
room.
I
mean
I've
and
a
lot
of
people
that
are
there,
which
it
looks
a
lot
better
than
it
was
before
all
I'm
asking
is.
If
the
city
can
just
find
somewhere
safe
for
us
to
park
our
RVs,
some
of
us
don't
have
anywhere
to
go,
I
mean
I,
don't
either
you
know
I,
you
know
it's
it's
hard
being
out
there
I
mean
you
might
not
know
what
it's
like
to
be
out
there,
but
I
used
to
help
homeless
people
back
when
I
was
okay.
I
C
Thank
you
next
speaker
come
to
the
microphone
I'd
also
like
to
call
George
and
Maria
Fiero
down
as
well.
N
Hi,
my
name
is
Pauline
Torres
and
I'm.
Also
a
resident
at
Plymouth
Park
previously
before
coming
to
Columbus
Park
I
used
to
be
homeless
and
I
used
to
stay
in
the
jungle
and
then
I'm
on
Center
Road,
and
it
is
very,
very
hard
being
out
in
the
and
out
of
nowhere
and
since
I've
gotten,
an
RV
I've
come
in
I've
gone
to
Columbus,
Park
and
I
feel
safe.
Where
I'm
at
right
now
I
feel
safe.
N
You
know,
and
it
is
you
know
a
little
I
see
like
I
I,
don't
know
but
I
feel
safe.
You
know,
I
mean
and
if
you
guys
are
able
to
find
a
summer
safe,
you
know
and
someone
where
we
could
feel
that
dignity,
because
sometimes
we
feel
like
you
know,
I
know
I,
do
you
know
they
don't
pick
up
the
trash
sometimes
and,
and
we
just
there's
rats
there
you
know
and
we
try
to
keep
it
clean
as
much
as
we
can.
You
know
and
I
mean
I.
N
Just
ask
that
you
guys,
please
you
know,
don't
leave
us
without
anywhere
to
go.
You
know
because
I
know
not
being
out
there
in
the
cold
is
very,
very
cold
and
not
having
somewhere
at
least
semi-warm.
You
know
in
a
safe,
you
know
you
could
put
yourself
in
you
know
it's
very
hard.
You
know
and
I.
Thank
you
guys
and
hope.
You
guys
consider
you
know
buying
a
summer
safe.
Thank
you.
O
Thank
you
for
this
opportunity
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
residents
at
Columbus
I'm,
a
San
Jose
resident,
so
Mountain
View
has
a
map
where
RVs
can
park
on
three
miles
of
streets
and
they
have
three
RV
safe
parking
programs.
San
Jose
has
none
I
stand
here
before
you
dismayed
dismayed
because
of
the
109
folks
in
the
phase
three
section
of
Columbus
45
are
now
moved
to
a
ball
field
and
expected
to
move
again
in
November.
O
O
O
They
can't
afford
the
rents,
like
some
of
our
police
officers,
opening
a
VTA
site
or
some
city-owned
property
with
safe
parking
should
have
been
a
coordinated
plan.
All
along
providing
safe
parking
for
hundreds
of
peoples
in
RVs,
Vans
and
cars
is
really
your
easiest
job
right
now,
wait
till
you
have
to
move
thousands
living
in
tents,
I
drove
by
the
VTA
parking
lot
off
of
Santa,
Teresa
Boulevard
and
there's
one
side
not
used
by
commuters
that
has
bathrooms
and
its
own
entrance.
O
A
Hi,
my
name
is
Maria
Fierro
and
I've
been
homeless,
maybe
two
years
due
to
a
hit
and
run
that
totaled,
my
RV
I'm,
just
I'm
asking
you
guys
to
please
just
find
a
song
where
to
say
parking.
That's
basically,
it
I
understand
that
the
difference
between
when
we
were
at
on
Taylor
and
Spring
Street,
it
was
so
horrible.
It's
been
way
different
from
where
we
are
right,
not
the
baseball
field.
We
try
to
clean
it
up
as
much
as
we
can.
We
have
everybody
clean
up
their
own
area.
A
It's
way
different,
it's
not
as
I
know
the
dirtiest.
The
worst
thing
that
could
be
seen
and
as
I
know
that
that's
visual
is
not
good
so,
but
we
are
trying
to
do
something
different
and
we
have
us
picking
them.
Everybody
picking
up
their
own
garbage
and
I
know
that's
the
biggest
thing.
It's
the
eyesore,
so
that
we
find
a
place,
a
place
that
we
could
park
and
you
know,
follow
rules
and
what
you
know
like
normal,
like
a
normal
mobile
home
or
something
that
everybody
could
park.
C
Thank
you,
George.
P
Good
afternoon
my
name's
George
Villanueva
I'm
a
resident
at
Columbus,
Park
and
I'm
here
for
some
of
my
friends
too,
and
all
we're
asking
is
if
you
could
possibly
extend
our
time
out
there
till
at
least
the
beginning
of
the
year,
because
all
the
safe
parking
and
safe
places
are
all
taken
up
and
there's
nowhere
to
go,
and
a
lot
of
us
are
complying
with
with
what
the
city
comes
out
and
tells
us
to
do.
But
it
seems
like
every
other
day
they
come
out
with
something
else.
So
I
don't
know.
L
Yes,
Paul
Soto
from
the
Horseshoe
Gail.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
There's
people
like
Dale,
it's
people
like
like
Sandy,
it's
people
like
Sean,
it's
people
like
RJ.
These
are
the
people
that
care
about
it.
I
want
to.
Thank
you
also,
Trisha
is
that
you
know
what
the
the
advocacy
that
I've
been
doing
at
this
Podium
for
over
five
years
consistently
is
because
of
citizens
like
yourself.
L
That
is
why
I'm
here,
I
have
been
advocating
for
you
long
before
you
even
became
homeless,
I
understand
what
it's
like
to
live
in
the
tents
I
understand
what
it's
like
to
live
in
the
creeks,
and
this
Council
still
having
fun
a
councilman
that
you
were
saying.
We
have
fun
here
at
rules
she's
still
having
fun
I,
don't
care
if
you're
having
fun
I
want
to
see
you
create
a
policy.
Okay
that
is
consistent
with
what
councilman
Perales
has
been
trying
to
do.
L
For
the
past
two
years,
councilman
Perales
and
Robert
Aguirre
have
been
doing
everything
that
they
can
to
have
sanctioning
captains
to
have
these
RV
play
and
constantly
constantly
got
pushed
back
and
shut
down.
Now
now
that
you
hear
from
the
least
one
of
these
okay,
the
least
one
of
these
building,
your
Towers,
demonstrating
your
power
and
who
Shadow
the
homeless
shiver,
that's
what
you've
been
doing.
L
You
have
been
building
your
Towers,
demonstrating
your
power
in
whose
Shadow
the
homeless
shiver.
You
have
absolutely
no
excuse.
Yesterday,
you
guys
gave
nine
million
dollar
tax
credit
to
billionaires
to
build
market
rate
housing,
while
this
is
happening
in
our
city
and
you
feel
absolutely
no
sense
of
Shame,
no
sense
of
no
sense
of
like
loss
of
Integrity
for
your
role
as
a
protector
of
the
citizens
that
are
least
able
to
protect
themselves
against
the
vast
amounts
of
wealth
that
is
coming
to
this
city.
You
should
feel
the
same
to
yourselves.
C
F
All
right,
well
Beekman
here
first
to
thank
you
to
Paul
he's
clarified
a
few
of
my
words
on
the
previous
item.
F
Thank
you,
Paul,
thanks
for
his
words
on
this
item
and
I,
just
I
wanted
to
thank
I,
guess,
Gail
and
just
everybody
who
showed
up
today
for
the
first
time
it
it's
a
lot
for
me
to
try
to
work
public
comment
time
each
week
and
I
just
hopefully
it
could
be
a
good
experience
for
people
and
you
can
be
able
to
talk
with
staff
afterwards
and
and
we
can
all
work
towards
a
a
good
experience,
a
trusting
experience
in
this
process
at
this
time,
I
wanted
to
offer
that
you
know
just
on
today's
agenda.
F
You
know
I
spoken
earlier
that
in
a
few
weeks
time
city
council
will
be
approving.
You
know
a
VTA,
safe
parking
site,
I
think
in
the
Santa
Teresa
area.
That
can
be
a
real
good
example
for
yourselves
how
to
really
work
towards
safe
parking
ideas
and
I.
Think
a
testament
to
you
know,
city
government
staff.
F
Thank
you
so
much
to
hear
the
words
about
the
examples
of
Mountain
View
that
just
really
helps
remind
me
what
we
can
be
really
be
working
for
and
on
the
other
side
of
it,
the
city
of
Fremont
has
had
a
very
austere
handling
of
their
RV
issues.
F
I
think
is
what
I
think
we
want
to
steer
away
from
a
bit
and
really
focus
on
on
the
good
ideas
of
Mountain
View
and
thanks
for
those
words
and
good
luck
to
everyone
in
our
work
on
this
item
in
the
next
few
weeks,
a
month.
B
Thank
you
before
go
to
the
committee.
I
know,
there's
a
early
consideration
form
rob
a
new
one.
If
you
can
speak
to
that,
please,
yes,.
E
That
was
completed
and
we
have
WC
manager,
Umar
passons
here
who
can
speak
in
more
detail
and
there's
at
least
one
or
two
clarifiers
in
there.
That
I
think
will
adjust
some
questions.
That
will
come
up
too,
but
we
can
chair,
take
on
the
the
questions
first
or
we
can
have
Omar
do
the
clarifying
first,
okay,.
J
Yeah,
thank
you
and
I
first
off.
Thank
you
to
the
the
speakers
that
came
out
of
the
residence
of
Columbus
Park,
especially
for
those
who
imagine
almost
thought
he
was
your
first
time
and
so
appreciate
you
coming
here
to
share
your
your
personal
perspective.
J
Thank
you
for
that
and
to
my
colleagues
to
presenting
this
and
continuing
to
try
to
find
efforts
to
house
those
that
are
in
RVs
throughout
the
city.
We
know
this
is
a
major
challenge.
J
I
I
was
thinking
about
bringing
it
up,
but
Paul
brought
it
up
for
me,
I
certainly
been
clamoring,
as
you
all
know,
for
sanction
cabinets
for
some
time.
This
is
not
exactly
along
the
exact
line
of
sanctioned
encampment,
but
in
essence
it
is
it's
it's
similar
for
for
vehicles.
We've
we've
tested
this
out.
We've
had
some
RV
safe
parking.
I
know
we
did
so
at
at
a
community
center
in
District
three
Roosevelt,
and
we
are
trying
to
continue
to
add
to
that
program
in
private
lots
and
churches
throughout
the
city.
J
But
we
know
that
we
have
a
huge
need,
not
just
here
at
Columbus
Park
but
throughout
the
city
of
places
that
we
we
already
have
RVs
that
are
parked
and
people
are
that
are
living
there
and
that's
all
they're
looking
for
is
a
place
where
they're
not
going
to
be
booted
out
of
and
in
a
place
that
they
can
call
home
momentarily,
while
the
obligation
is
still
on
us
to
get
them
housed
as
well.
J
But
my
concern
was
really
in
recommendation
for
and
I
see
that
it
came
up
in
the
early
consideration
form
and
just
in
the
way
that
I
was
reading
it.
In
the
memo
recommendation,
4B
stated
that
specific
identified
sites
that
have
been
approved
by
the
Council
Office,
in
which
the
site
is
located
as
suitable
for
an
RV
safe
parking
facility.
J
My
only
concern
there
is
the
level
of
of
power
and
authority
that
a
singular
Council
Office
would
have
on
essentially
selecting
or
I,
didn't
read
it
this
way,
but
but
potentially
vetoing
the
selection
of
a
site,
and
so
I'll
I'll
point
to
one
of
the
makers
of
the
authors
of
the
memo
and
see
for
some
clarification
on
that
and
I.
Think
it's
seems,
like
staff
was
asking
for
some
clarification
on
that
as
well
in
their
early
consideration
memo.
So
maybe,
along
the
lines
of
the
same
question,
the
staff
had.
B
Yeah
and
thank
you
councilmember
for
that
that
question
and
you're
right
it
should
should
be
clarified.
The
intent
was
never
to
give
an
individual
council
member
veto
power
over
over
a
site.
The
intent
was,
if
you
have
a
calcium
member
who
has
a
problem
and
also
a
council
member.
That's
been
proactive
in
terms
of
finding
a
solution
that
they
should
have
priority
in
terms
of
resources,
but
the
intent
was
never
to
have.
Anybody
have
veto
power.
K
And
vice
vice
mayor
Jones
and
councilmember
Pros,
if
I
may
first
thank
you
for
those
that
came
out.
It's
a
hard,
hard
thing
to
do
and
we
appreciate
it
as
a
staff,
the
people
that
are
out
and
obviously
are
elected
leadership.
So
so
thank
you
for
that
and
I
would
say
vice
mayor
Jones.
Your
your
reading.
Just
now
is
the
way
the
staff
interpreted
in
preparing
the
early
consideration
form
that
this
is.
K
We
know
how
challenging
it
can
be,
unfortunately,
to
cite-
and
so
when
there
are
Council
offices,
that
step
forward
not
to
veto
but
to
prioritize
to
say
we
do
want
creating
a
path
so
that
it's
easier
for
those
to
get
done
on
limited
resources
potentially
allows
us
to
move
towards
providing
places
for
people
like
those
who
have
come
today
to
have
a
place
to
live
so
I
think
that's
what
we
thought
and
it's
good
to
hear
that.
That's
that's
what
the
Memo's
intent
was.
J
Yeah
and
I'm
completely
fine
with
that
as
well.
I
I
would
agree
with
that
that
if
a
council
office
has
identified
a
site
and
in
essence
given
their
blessing
on
that
site,
then
certainly
I
I
would
love
to
see
that
site
and
and
that
that
area
be
prioritized.
It
was
the
the
reading
of
it
that
made
it
seem
as
though
it
could
be
utilized
in
any
other
way.
So
so
long
as
that's
clarified
and
it
seems
like
staff,
is
comfortable
with
it
too
I'm
comfortable
with
this
moving
forward.
J
So
I'll
move
approval
of
the
the
memorandum
and
then
the
early
consideration
form.
B
All
right,
we
have
a
motion,
do
I
hear
a
second
second.
G
Yeah,
thank
you
and
thank
you
for
those
who
came
out
the
hearing,
the
testimony
directly
from
people
on
the
on
the
sites
people
experiencing
this
is
are
the
is
the
most
important
impactful
thing
for
us.
So
I
appreciate
that
we've
been
trying
to
find
ways
to
just
to
have
folks
such
as
yourselves
come
out
and
meet
members
of
the
community
as
well,
because
I
think
people
haven't
had
the
opportunity
to
see
you
know
what
what
the
experiences
are,
and
you
know
we'll
we'll
continue
to
work
towards
doing
that.
G
As
many
of
you
know,
my
my
office
has
been
asking
for
an
RV
site
safe
parking
for
over
well
over
a
year.
It's
really
important,
it's
not
just
because
of
Columbus
Park,
but
we
have
and
won't
go
through
this
again.
But
three
weeks
ago,
at
the
rules
committee
meeting
I
gave
my
presentation
of
a
couple
of
sites
in
in
District
Four,
which
are
really
impacted
by
RVs.
G
Right
now
we
have
at
least
50
RVs
parked
in
North
San
Jose
along
streets
and
there's
other
areas
as
well,
and
so
it's
it's
been
a
priority
for
us.
We're
still
trying
to
find
a
site,
I
know
we're
talking
Omar
about
that.
That's.
Why
I
think
it's
great
that
in
the
memo
it
says
for
those
of
you
who
find
a
site
we'll
we'll
help
you
make
it
happen
as
opposed
to
waiting
for
us
to
do
this.
G
You
know
in
some
city-wide
manner
is
just
I
think,
but
that's
great
if
we
can
get
it
done
in
District
Four
and
in
other
places
and
our
office
last
year
open
to
site
temporary
site
in
North
San
Jose
worked
with
the
residents
who
were
living.
There
saw
just
how
impactful
it
was
to
them
and
how
successful
it
was
helping
people
get
the
resources
and
help
they
needed
to
have
a
place
to
park
and
live.
G
So
we
learned
some
things
from
that
and
I
want
to
ask
the
maker
of
the
motion
councilman
proless,
about
including
my
memo
as
well,
which
I
think
you
probably
intended
to
do,
but
just
neglected
to
mention,
because
we
in
that
memo
we
talk
about
providing
resources
to
people
who
need
help
getting
their
RVs
up
and
running
and
other
things
which
are
can
be
small
things,
but
often
very
hard
for
people.
We
help
people
do
that
at
the
site
when
we
were
in
North
San
Jose.
G
We
learned
that
the
importance
of
that
we
also
in
that
memo
talk
about
the
flip
side,
which
is
where
we
are
RVs,
do
remain.
Let's
have
some
rules
also
about
safety
for
everybody
else
in
terms
of
traffic
safety
and
other
things,
and
because
we
have
some
experiences
now
in
some
areas
where
there's
just
such
a
large
density
of
RVs,
that
people
don't
can't
pull
in
and
out
of
parking
lots,
and
things
like
that.
So
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
part
of
this
process
as
well.
K
And
council
member
Cohen,
just
one
point,
I
think
we
also
had
previously
greenlit
your
recommendation.
So
that's
in
line
with
what
I
believe
steps
staff's
belief
about
where
we
were
headed.
Your
comments,
lift
up
that
this
is
especially
important
both
for
people
who
need
a
place
to
stay
and
for
members
of
the
community
all
up
and
down
the
city
and
so
I
think
that's
a
really
useful
point,
and
one
of
the
things
that's
useful
is
that
we
heard
from
all
of
the
people
who
spoke
that
they're
they
really
are
service.
J
Again
and
yes,
I
did
a
make
a
mistake
and
omit
your
memo
and
intended
to
so.
I'll
include
that
in
motion.
B
Right
and
I
don't
see
any
hands
raised.
So
let's
vote.
P
D
F
Hi
we're
here
I
might
run
out
of
time,
but
hopefully
I
can
finish
no
matter
how
good
Sanctuary,
City
policies
can
be
at
the
local
level.
I
feel
San.
F
Jose
City
government
has
to
continue
to
work
much
with
everyday
Community
to
create
a
more
clear,
comprehensive
understanding
of
how
current
data
collection
practices
is
able
to
be
bought,
sold
and
used
to
both
commercial
and
law
enforcement
entities
at
the
national
level
and
from
this
San
Jose
City
Government
needs
to
be
willing
to
work
with
everyday
Community,
continual
efforts
towards
better,
more
clear
civil
protection
ideas
and
Sanctuary
City
policies
with
surveillance
and
data
collection
issues.
Lexisnexis
data
collection
has
an
important
part
in
this
simply
needs
a
more
open
public
discussion.
F
San
Jose,
City
Government
needs
to
be
willing
to
work
with
everyday
community
in
continual
efforts
towards
more
clear
civil
protection.
Oh
I've
heard
that
part
already
ideas
with
Sanctuary
City
policies
from
all
of
this
I
feel
San
Jose
may
still
lack
an
overall
bureaucratic
maturity
in
these
good
Community
practices.
I
feel
go
one
electronic
billboard,
full
of
surveillance
and
data
collection
technology
May
simply
be
enough
for
San
Jose
into
the
next
decade,
there's
already
much
geofencing
and
surveillance
and
data
collection
Tech
that
is
taking
place
in
the
downtown
area.
F
It
is
my
hope,
the
current
Noble
intentions
of
taking
away
regular
Billboards
and
it's
bright
from
local
San,
Jose
neighborhoods
and
to
plant
more
trees
in
San
Jose
for
a
better
Urban
canopy
can
become
a
more
regular
Community
process
and
without
having
to
make
deals
of
quid
quote
quote
and
in
continuing
to
sacrifice
the
Privacy
rights
and
civil
protections
of
everyday
Community.
If
it
is
deemed
necessary,
it's
absolutely
necessary
I
hope.
A
second
electronic
billboard
will
again
want
to
be
built
only
around
the
airport
area,
with
20
seconds
left
important
developments.
F
At
this
time,
the
Civic
Innovation
department
has
offered
a
press
releases
this
past
summer
wanting
to
develop
interesting.
New
ideas
of
racial
Equity
with
data
collection
and
AI
is
used
and
I
hope.
San
Jose
City
Government
staff
wants
to
continue
to
plan
for
items
detect
accountability
in
their
City
agendas.
Thanks.
D
L
L
He
said
that
he
assumed
that
that
tax
break
was
going
to
be
in
the
overall
deal.
This
is
what
he
said
word
for
word
on
the
record.
Okay,
the
question
was
never
posed
to
him.
How
did
you
assume
that
what
gave
you
that
idea,
what
allowed
you
to
entertain
the
notion
that
you
were
entitled
or
that
that
assumption
had
any
basis
for
it
unless
there
was
a
conversation
prior
in
order
for
that
developer,
to
have
that
assumption?
L
Okay,
I'm
saying
this
because
it
needs
to
be
stated
publicly
on
the
record.
Okay
number
two
is
the
fact
that
this
city
allowed
that
developer
to
buy
it
back
to
buy
back
at
one
hundred
and
thirty
thousand
dollars
per
unit
130
000
per
unit.
That's
how
much
that
developer
paid
for
a
market
rate
housing
unit,
one
that
he's
going
to
turn
around
and
sell
for
eight
eight
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
to
1.3
million
dollars.
L
That's
what
you
gave
to
them!
You
see
that
was
infected
in
in
your
rationale.
It
astounds
me
on
how
the
the
kinds
of
rationales
justification
rationalizations,
minimizations
and
denials
that
occur
whenever
it
is
that
the
developer
wants
to
do
business
in
this
city.
This
is
my
city:
okay,
they're,
guests;
okay,
they
need
to
ask
permission,
and
it's
not
by
it's,
not
by
a
council
member.
They
need
to
ask
the
public
and
the
people-
and
they
haven't,
come
to
me
yet
and
because
of
that,
uh-uh,
no
they're,
not.