►
Description
City of San José, California
Joint meeting of Rules and Open Government / Committee of the Whole, October 19, 2022
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be held at San José City Hall and also accessible via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=1005602&GUID=0DACFF9C-3AE5-4B03-B8D7-B77522C42D6A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
D
D
D
D
If
people
want
to
ask
about
those
cameras,
I
hope
it
can
be
easy
to
explain
to
people
what
what
is
actually
involved
in
the
cameras
and
whatever
its
practices,
and
it's
learning
that
process
and
sharing
that
openly.
That's
how
you
build
Community,
Trust
and
people
will
want
to
in
understanding
how
it
works,
will
then
want
to
return
to
the
meeting
process
and
not
feel
fearful
and
intimidated,
because
it
is
fearful,
intimidating
and
intimidating
and,
along
with
the
you
know,
hybrid
meeting
Zoom
process.
D
The
data
collection
involved,
how
you
can
talk
to
community
about
that
in
the
YouTube
process,
it's
important
to
learn
how
we
learn
how
to
do
that.
Good
luck
in
those
efforts
from
all
of
us
and
just
with
the
solar
and
storage
issues
next
week,
just
an
incredible
thank
you
for
this
sort
of
work
and,
as
always,
be
considering
worker
rights
issues
in
the
future
of
these
good
solar
practices.
Thank
you.
F
B
B
D
D
This
this
fall
and
winter
with
covid.
Sorry
I
didn't
mention
that
before
good
luck
on
these
efforts,
I
know
State
of
California
governor
newsom's
office
has
declared
February
next
February
that
they're
going
to
consider
ending
the
state
of
emergency
ideas,
I
think
in
some
form,
and
so
February
is
a
big
month
that
we're
going
to
you
know
dwindle
down
our
covid
emergency
Protection,
Services
things,
but
we've
got
a
fall
and
winter
to
go.
So
good
luck!
D
B
A
C
Thank
you
vice
mayor
Lee,
Wilcox
assistant
city
manager,
item
1C
on
today's
agenda.
The
Cannabis
business
ordinance
revisions
is
referred
directly
to
the
city
council
for
November
1st
2022
council
meeting.
There
has
been
an
inadvertent,
Brown
act,
violation
due
to
a
communication
about
this
item
between
a
majority
of
the
rules
committee's
members.
Outside
of
this
meeting.
Therefore,
there
can
be
no
discussion,
presentation,
public
comment
or
discussion
on
recommendations
from
the
rules
committee.
On
this
particular
item
you
are
in
attendance
and
wishing
to
speak
on
this
item.
D
Hi
I
kind
of
wanted
to
offer
public
comment
on
the
last
item
that
the
Public's
been
heard
from
from
a
mistake
on
the
previous
item,
I
find
that
questionable
how
the
brown
act
works.
That
way
for
this
item
boy
yeah,
you
guys,
are
really
you're
trying
to
address.
We
had
a
really
serious
issues
of
I
got
no
timer
on
on
my
end.
Oh
there
it
is
okay.
Thank
you,
I'm
at
138.
Thank
you
I!
D
You
guys
are
trying
to
handle
this
very
maturely.
Thank
you.
Interestingly,
there
were
four
deaths:
pedestrian
deaths
last
week
and
I
I
worried
a
lot
and
you
trying
to
address
this
issue
by
by
working
through
the
school
systems,
and
you
you
in
your
memo,
you,
you
wouldn't
work
proactively
and
holistically.
You
say
so
thank
you
for
that.
D
G
G
Well,
just
as
you
can
easily
amend
a
law
off
when
you
need
to
amend
it,
I
would
suggest
that
considering
the
necessity
for
this
type
of
service
that
the
San
Jose
City
Council
do
whatever
it
has
to
do
with
the
San
Jose
Unified
School
District,
to
ensure
the
crossing
guards
are
placed
at
these
schools
and
that
there's
found
money
I,
don't
care
where
it's
found!
Look
for
it
because
it's
there
you
get
it
and
you
you
Institute
it.
G
When
I
was
going
to
school,
I
had
to
walk
through
walk
past
three
bars
in
the
Hollywood
Inn
just
to
get
to
Washington
School,
there's
blood
all
over
the
all
over
the
pavement.
You
know
so
I'm
glad
that
you
know
now.
Finally,
people
are
thinking
about
kid
safety
when
they're
walking
to
school,
but
we're
being
slaughtered
on
the
streets
over
the
past
year.
Three
people
that
I
have
personally
known
throughout
my
tenure
here
out
on
the
streets
have
died
as
a
result
of
pedestrian
accidents.
G
One
of
them
was
the
was
the
Senora
over
there
on
the
on
Monterey,
the
one
that
is
connected
with
the
blackberries
and
so
so
we're
being
killed
a
person.
A
pedestrian
on
the
street
is
more
susceptible
to
being
killed
than
a
person
with
a
gun.
So
I
don't
want
to
hear
about
gun
violence.
I
want
to
hear
no
more
about
it.
I
want
to
hear
no
fear
mongering
I.
Don't
hear
nothing
like
that.
G
What
I
want
to
see
is
actual
policy
that
is
instituted
without
exploiting
the
poor,
because
what
Vision
zero
does
is
it
uses
these
statistics
in
order
to
get
grant
money
in
order
to
to
put
this
surveillance
in
yet
nothing
gets
done
about
the
real
issue
crossing
guards.
That's
what
we
mean.
We
need
crossing
guards
that
are
paid
and
they're
paid
well,
so
that
they
want
to
show
up
to
work
and
they're
put
strategically
around
these
schools.
G
Vice
mayor
Jones,
council,
members
and
staff,
my
name
is
Matthew
Tinsley
and
I'm.
Speaking
on
behalf
of
Dr
Marianne
dewang,
the
term
superintendent
schools
as
you're
all
aware,
a
month
ago,
at
the
greater
diving
traffic
accident
while
walking
to
school.
This
was
a
tragic
loss
for
their
family
and
our
hearts
go
after
everyone
at
castlemont
elementary
school,
we're
grateful
to
the
parents,
volunteers,
crossing
guards
and
police
who
make
our
children's
church
to
school
safer,
but
more
cans
should
be
done.
G
We
at
the
County
office
appreciate
the
call
from
the
mayor
and
members
of
this
committee
for
a
thoughtful
collaborative
approach
to
improving
children's
safety
on
their
way
to
our
Farm
School.
Achieving
this
goal
will
require
close
collaboration
between
the
city's
experts
in
traffic
management,
the
police
and
the
school
communities
themselves.
G
The
administrators
staff
and
the
parents
who
walk
their
children
to
school
each
day
are
invaluable
in
determining
what
the
safety
issues
are
and
how
they
can
be
addressed.
As
the
vision,
zero
task
force
addresses
small
safety.
We
strongly
encourage
you
to
begin
by
engaging
with
the
school's
community
and
districts
across
the
city
to
benefit
from
their
lived
experience
of
this
issue.
We
at
the
County
office
are
ready
to
pop
them
in
any
way
that
we
can
to
ensure
that
this
most
recent
tragedy
is
the
last
that
it's
coming.
Thank
you.
B
C
Sure,
thank
you
vice
mayor.
There
is
an
early
consideration
form
by
staff.
A
few
of
the
item.
Items
are
greenlit
by
the
administration
it
can
move
forward.
There
are
other
yellow
items
that
are
budgetary
in
nature
or
would
need
resources
to
move
forward.
Those
are
yellow,
lit
and
John
ristow.
Our
director
of
apartment
director
of
transportation,
is
here
for
any
questions
that
the
committee
might
have.
C
B
B
C
So
the
way
that
it's
worded
in
the
memorandum-
and
this
is
semantics-
but
especially
when
it
comes
to
the
budget
process,
we're
very
detailed
in
nature-
the
direction
was
direct-
the
city
manager
to
prepare
recommendations.
So
that
means,
as
we
come
forward
in
next
year's
budget
process,
that
we'd
already
be
recommending
those
expenditures,
as
opposed
to
Direction
around
preparing
analysis
and
cost
estimates
for
the
council's
consideration,
because
it
is
our
responsibility
to
really
evaluate
in
the
context
of
the
city's
overall
budget
condition
at
that
time
before
we
actually
make
a
recommendation.
C
B
B
H
Vice
mayor
and
committee
John
Russo,
director
of
Transportation,
so
let
me
start
with
the:
is
it
one
seed,
the
the
first
yellow
light
item
they're
referring
to
yeah,
so
for
us
to
be
able
to
undertake
this
effort,
it
will
take
some
new
resources
because
it
will
require
us
to
do
some
data
Gathering
analysis
working
with
school
districts
and
police
department
to
coordinate
on
whatever
it
is
that
we're
going
to
want
to
implement
out
there.
So
it
is
a
new
res.
H
It
would
either
be
new
resources
or
redirected
resources
from
current
Staffing
levels,
so
those
redirected
resources
would
be
coming
directly
from
our
vision,
zero
program
and
implementation
of
quick,
build
or
The
Pedestrian
safety
enhancements
that
are
being
developed
in
each
one
of
the
council
districts.
So
we're
seeing
that
as
as
a
resource
and
a
budgetary
need
for
us
to
be
able
to
do
that
action
item.
H
One
FTE
two
FTS
yeah,
so
if
just
and
we
we've
already
been
starting
to
think
through
this,
if
you
and
we've
been
doing
some
back
of
envelope
calculating
and
there's
300
schools
there's,
you
know
perhaps
16
intersections
around
schools
with
four
different
legs
of
those
intersections
and
then
a
number
of
roadway
segments
that
would
all
have
to
be
analyzed
in
terms
of
what
types
of
traffic
safety
devices
would
want
to
be
installed
in
those
areas.
So
just
doing
the
math
there
you're
ripping
to
the
thousands
of
different
locations.
H
That
would
need
some
analysis
and
then
a
prioritization
process.
So
the
resources
needed
for
that
was
probably
a
small
team
of
dot
to
be
able
to
do
that
sort
of
stuff
in
a
over
the
next
year
to
two
years
to
be
able
to
do
that.
If
you're
talking
about
all
the
thousands
of
different
locations
that
can
be
possibly
considered.
B
H
Right
so
it's
speed,
humps
are
in
our
toolkit
for
traffic
calming
and
for
safety
to
control
speeds
of
vehicles.
We've
installed
41
different
roadway
segments
in
the
city.
So
far,
so
we
already
have
quite
a
bit
of
speed,
hump
experience
out
there
and
recently,
we've
gotten
some
other
ones
in
on
some
pretty
high
traffic
streets,
so
that
that's
actually
a
good
thing
for
us
to
be
able
to
do
this.
H
We
do
have
a
policy,
a
traffic
common
policy
that
does
require
certain
things
to
be
done
for
us
to
be
able
to
install
and
implement,
one
of
which
is
a
really
pretty
high
level.
Community
engagement
to
collaborate
with
the
community.
That's
going
to
actually
have
these
installed,
which
requires
petitioning
and
surveying
I
know
a
number
of
council
members
have
gone
through
that
so
right
now
it
does
require
us
to
do
that.
Analysis
go
to
the
community
survey
for
that
acceptance.
H
So
what?
If,
in
the
memo,
it
does
say
that
we're
to
bring
it
back
some
streamlining
processes
for
that
and
I
think
we're
all
for
that.
I
think
we'd
like
to
see
this
go
a
lot
sooner.
A
lot
faster.
A
lot
more
efficiently
over
the
the
course
of
the
next
year,
I
think
we're.
What
we're
talking
about
here,
though,
is
for
us
again
for
us
to
be
able
to
do
this
on
an
expedited
thing.
H
B
H
H
H
We
would
love
to
be
able
to
do
that
in
the
future
and
actually
facilitate
and
streamline
that
even
further,
but
it's
still
currently,
the
policy
requires
us
to
actually
go
through
some
of
these
steps
and
again
we,
the
council,
can
change
any
policy
that
they
want
to
change.
It's
just
going
to
take
some
analysis
to
be
able
to
do
that.
So
I
think
what
what
this
is
trying
to
indicate
is.
B
I
I
H
Yeah,
you
are
remembering
what
we
did
on
21st
Street,
North,
21st
Street
between
Julian
and
Taylor.
Those
speed
pumps
are
implemented
and
working
just
fine,
but
what
you're
describing
is
that
survey
process
that
reaches
out
to
literally
every
property,
owner
or
tenant
that
happens
to
live
along
that
street
to
get
a
survey
up
their
acceptance
or
non-acceptance
of
the
speed
humps
either
along
the
Route
or
those
that
are
particularly
looked
at
right
in
front
of
someone's
house
so
yeah
we
we
did.
We
did
not
change
the
policy
after
we
learned.
H
Maybe
our
practice
needed
some
improvement.
We
have
have.
We
have
tried
to
change
that
practice,
so
it's
not
as
confusing
and
not
as
burdensome,
but
the
policy
of
surveying
and
petitioning
is
still
in
that
practice
of
survey
and
petition
is
still
in
the
policy.
So
we
would
still
need
to
do
it
unless
that's
been
weighed
I.
I
H
I
H
I
Okay,
even
that
I
think,
though,
if
if
you
have
changed
the
way
you
know
your
team
is
implementing
that
policy.
I
think
that
that's
helpful,
because
that
certainly
was
a
large
delay
and
not
only
delay
it
was
it
was.
It
was
the
difference
between
failure
and
success
right.
We
in
the
way
we
were
qualifying
or
quantifying
the
non-responsive
property
owners,
and
so
I
do
think.
There's
some
ways
that
you
know.
Maybe
we
can
do.
I
I
Literally
from
from,
as
you
drive
between
San
Jose
and
Campbell,
there,
all
of
a
sudden
become
numerous
blocks
that
have
speed
humps
throughout
them
and
I
know
this
because
that's
where
my
parents
live
and
so
I
drive
drive
the
area
very
frequently,
and
we
heard
that
immediately
after
this
incident,
where
there
were
parents
wondering
why
that
that
difference
was
so
blatantly
obvious
right
that
it
in
certain
streets,
they
were
seeing
a
lot
of
speed
humps
in
in
San
Jose,
the
San
Jose
portion.
If
you
will
they
weren't
and
I
do
know.
I
I
Would
it
slow
down
their
response
times
and
then
we
kind
of
worked
through
that
on
on
the
from
the
speed
bumps
to
the
speed,
humps
right
and
so,
but
it's
taken
some
time,
I
think
to
get
to
where
it's
more
feasible
and
as
we
went
through
the
process
on
21st
Street
I
can
tell
you,
the
residents
are
extremely
happy
right
and
I
mean
so
I've
seen
it.
It
took
way
longer
than
I.
I
I
too,
would
like
to
see
that
happen
in
much
quicker
time
frame,
recognizing
that
it's
still
going
to
take
the
staff
time
right
to
go
out
and
petition,
and
all
of
that's
still
going
to
take
some
time,
but
before
and
when
I
took
office
it
seemed
nearly
impossible
to
get
you
know
to
get
these
speed
bumps
slash
now,
speed,
humps,
and
so
I
too
would
would
encourage
the
work
that
could
be
done
to
try
to
make
that
easier.
Next,.
H
Year,
yeah
just
to
assure
councilmember
Morales
and
the
rest
of
the
council
and
the
mayor,
speed
humps
are
definitely
at
the
top
of
our
list
for
speed
control
in
neighborhoods,
as
I
mentioned
a
little
earlier.
My
my
response
to
one
of
the
questions
we
have
41
segments
in
the
city
that
we've
implemented
speedups
on,
so
that's
not
insignificant.
We
have
a
lot
more
that
we
could
do.
The
Department
of
Transportation
is
supportive
of
that.
H
We
just
have
some
practices
that
are
outlined
in
a
policy
that
may
need
to
be
modified
and
for
us
to
do
that
we
need
to
go
through
that
process,
but
we
are
all
for
putting
in
speed
humps
where
they
make
sense
and
they're
going
to
be
able
to
control
the
speeds
that
are
particularly
around
school.
So
I
think
we're
very
supportive
of
this.
H
So
I
think
this
needs
to
be,
as
outlined
in
this
memorandum,
a
significant
city-wide
effort
to
do
this
for
us
to
make
it
streamlined
to
and
to
make
it
resource
to
be
able
to
do
it.
That's
that's
where
the
green
excuse
me,
the
yellow
light
came
in
and
some
of
those
things
but
I
think
we're
just
to
assure
you
we're
all
for
it.
We
would
like
to
be
able
to
streamline
and
make
more
of
those
happen.
I
Yeah,
thank
you
and
look
I
I
when
I
talked
to
parents
as
well
from
the
area
and
or
my
own
parents,
for
instance,
I.
Clearly
don't
try
to
compare
San
Jose
to
Campbell
right
much
smaller
City,
smaller
footprint,
much
less
schools.
So
we
have
a
different
challenge
when
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
implement
speed
humps
everywhere,
we
want
them
in
the
city.
I
You
know
in
in
short
time
it's
just
not
a
reality,
so
we
have
to
prioritize
and
we
have
to
focus
on
on
areas
where
I
think
that
it's
going
to
be
most
beneficial
and
so
I
do
recognize.
That
challenge
as
well
and
I
think
that,
just
from
what
I've
seen
over
the
course
of
my
terms
in
office,
it
has
been
more
challenging
than
than
not,
and
so
as
we
can
make
that
and
continue
to
make
it
easier.
I
You
know
our
quick
build
projects
in
those
areas
quickly
enough,
as
our
community
would
want.
So
adding
a
safe
routes
to
school
I
think
is,
is
a
good
idea,
but
it
has
to
come
with
additional
resources
and
additional
Personnel.
Quite
frankly,
right
because
again,
we
already
don't
have
enough.
That's
the
biggest
challenge
that
we
face
in
in
the
division:
zero
task
force,
even
as
we
had
an
interest
and
I
think
over
the
last
couple
years,
we
thought
we
might
be
able
to
resolve
it
through
the
budget
process.
I
What
we
realized
was
that,
even
if
we
were
to
throw
more
money
at
these
projects
to
get
the
infrastructure
for
them,
your
team
didn't
have
enough
staff
right.
You
didn't
have
enough
Personnel
to
manage
all
of
those
projects
in
in
a
quicker
time
frame
than
what's
already
laid
out,
and
so,
if
we
were
to
add
additional
work
to
that
and
have
additional
say,
quick,
builds
or
or
traffic
calming
projects,
I
think
that
that's
really
at
the
end
of
the
day,
what
we
would
need.
H
Ahead
again,
I
think
that
we're
we're
in
agreement
with
that
is
that
for
us-
and
we
want
to
do
this
program
laid
out
in
this
safe
to
school
memo,
it
will
take
some
engineering
resources
to
be
able
to
go
through
the
analysis,
collection
prioritizing
working
with
the
other
entities.
We
actually
to
be
able
to
form
a
program.
That's
going
to
be
able
to
deliver
all
that.
All
of
that
there's
resources
both
the
front
end
with
analysis,
as
well
as
the
delivering
physical
improvements
into
the
streets.
So
it
is
a
resource
challenge.
H
We're
ready
to
do
it
I
think
it's
a
good
idea,
we'd
like
to
do
it,
but
it'll
take
well.
The
team
I
think
I
mentioned
before
that
the
same
team
that
would
that
is
working
on
quick,
build
for
vision,
zero
and
The
Pedestrian
safety
enhancements
each
one
of
the
air
in
each
one
of
the
council.
Districts
is
essentially
doing
the
same
thing
that
this
team
would
be
so
we
we
do
need
some
more
people
to
be
able
to
get
all
of
it
done
unless
we
just
redirect
and
something
will
be
delayed.
I
Yeah
and
I
and
I
I,
obviously
that's
in
line
with
where
the
early
consideration
memo
was
at
and
so
on.
That's
again,
it's
not
a
surprise
to
me
because
that's
something
we
are
discussing
in
Vision,
zero,
left
and
right,
and
so
you
know
constantly
trying
to
find
ways
where
we
can
get
more
of
these
priority
safety
corridors.
You
know
covered
with
with
either
quick
build
projects
or
other
traffic
coming
Investments.
I
I
There
was
not
an
idea
of
where
the
end
was
in
sight.
Was
it
going
to
be
a
year
right?
Was
it
going
to
be
two
years?
I
think
that
this
may
be
something
that
the
council
should
consider
making
more
permanent
and
then,
as
suggested
in
the
memo
for
my
colleagues
having
subcommittees
out
of
it,
because
today
we
don't
it's
the
task
force
right
meeting
on
a
more
regular
basis.
I
That
sort
of
what
the
future
of
the
the
task
force
should
look
like
and
so
I
I
think
that,
where
you're
already
going
is,
is
pointing
to
where
the
task
force
should
likely
go
anyways
and
start
to
incorporate
some
more
of
an
understanding
and
a
whole
a
bigger
picture
on
traffic
safety
in
other
areas.
Besides,
just
our
priority
safety
corridors
that
we
may
want
to
have
a
focus
on,
and
the
last
piece
is
the
crossing
guard
piece.
I
I,
think
that
and
I
know
I
don't
know.
Do
you
have
the
the
tally?
I
Yeah
I
was
curious
in
regards
to
the
crossing
guard
program.
I,
wasn't
aware
prior
to
us
discussing
it
what
the
vacancies
looked
like
and
what
you
know
so
and
I
I,
like
the
recommendation
from
my
colleagues
like,
but
I,
wanted
to
see.
If
you
can
describe
the
scope
of
the
challenge
that
we
have
there
so.
J
This
is
Michelle
Bart's
program
she's,
not
here
she's
a
program
program
manager,
I,
have
discussed
it
with
her
and
I
do
have
some
facts.
Hopefully
I
can
get
you
the
answers.
You
want.
Basically,
there's
allocated
262
crossing
guards
on
a
permanent
ongoing
basis.
As
of
October
11th,
we
have
183
crossing
guards
that
are
actually
positions
that
are
filled,
and
that
includes
people
that
are
on
leave,
whether
it's
vacation,
medical
or
on
a
sign
hours.
So
it
could
be
on
a
given
basis,
either
15
to
20
less
than
that.
J
I
And
and
like
John
was
saying
earlier,
you
you
could
gauge,
you
know
at
least
say
your
school's,
surrounded
right
by
four
streets,
maybe
not
all,
but
in
essence,
there's
a
lot
more
than
just
one
or
two
intersections
that
you
may
want
a
crossing
guard,
that's
correct,
and
so,
if
we
could,
you
know
multiply
that
you
know
by
by
four
at
its
at
its
most
minimum
right,
we're
still
looking
at
potentially
over
a
thousand
intersections
in
the
city
where
we
may
want
a
crossing
guard
and
currently
you're
saying
we
have
about
120.
There's.
J
121
approved
intersections
throughout
the
city
that
have
crossing
guards
and
I
know
it
goes
through
a
lengthy
process
from
talking
to
Michelle
as
far
as
if
it
wants.
If
there's
an
intersection,
it
has
to
go
through
a
survey
and
then
it
it's
a
there's.
A
number
count:
I,
don't
know
what
that
count
is
as
to
pedestrians
and
or
traffic,
and
then
it
gets
approved
and
once
it
gets
approved,
then
and
I
think
that
happens
in
the
budget
process
each
year
it
can
get
added,
but
I,
don't
remember.
J
I
J
I
Okay,
I
think
that's
the
that's
it
for
my
questions
in
regards
to
crossing
guards.
Thank
you,
okay,
I,
and
on
on
a
separate
note
for
my
colleagues
and
I.
Think
any
parent.
This
you
you're
good
I,
think
that,
from
what
we
just
heard
as
well
right
I
mean
I
I
feel
in
a
more
perfect
world.
If
we
had
an
interest
from
a
school
right,
it
would
be
it'd
be
better
if
we
were
able
to
fill
those
intersections
with
crossing
guards
versus
because
of
maybe
a
staffing
challenge.
I
Nonetheless,
I
do
think
that
ensuring
that
the
crossing
guard
program
is
fully
staffed
up
is
something
that
we
can
do
to
to
help,
and
not
only
that,
but
potentially
even
beef,
that
up
looking
at
small,
yet
small
budget
surpluses
but
budget
surpluses
in
the
coming
years.
I
think
that's
something
as
well.
That's
warranted
for
for
the
council
to
look
at
through
the
budget
process
and
then
seeing
what
what
are
the
challenges
with
with
actually
Staffing
up
these
programs
right?
Is
it
a
budgetary
issue?
Is
it?
I
I
If
we
wanted
to
to
beef
up
the
program
and
have
crossing
guards
at
more
of
the
schools
we
already
understaffed
and-
and
we
already
have
vacancies
so
I-
appreciate
that
recommendation
as
as
well-
and
those
are
my
comments
on
this
and
all
make
a
motion
to
accept
the
memorandum
with
the
early
consideration
form
and
then
the
the
changes
in
the
verbiage
on
I
think
it
was
regulation,
two
that
the
vice
mayor
included.
Second,.
E
Thank
you
and
a
number
of
things
comments
to
make
and
also
follow
on
some
of
the
questions
that
have
already
been
asked.
I'm
going
to
start
actually
with
the
crossing
guard
question
just
because,
as
somebody
who
spent
14
years
on
the
school
board,
I
know
the
process
well
for
how
these
crossing
guards
come
to
be
and
and
the
process
is
that
the
districts
ask
for
crossing
guards.
Not
all
schools
need
them.
E
Many
schools
or
neighborhood
schools
and
the
school
districts
decide
that
those
schools
are,
you
know,
have
safer
routes
and
also
have
their
own
staff
that
does
crossing
so
they're,
really
that
many
of
the
schools
nearer
to
Major
streets
or
on
areas
that
they
really
feel
like
traffic
is
an
issue
they
request
them.
So,
for
example,
in
our
district
with
13
schools,
there
are
four
I
think
that
have
requested
crossing
guards
and
and
our
and
those
positions
are
filled.
E
We
have
a
new
brand
new
campus,
the
K-12
campus
in
North
San
Jose,
that
Santa
Clara
unified,
opened
up
with
an
elementary
middle
and
high
school
right
at
the
corner
of
Zanker
and
Tasman,
and
they
are
going
to
need
crossing
guards
because
getting
kids
from
the
big
communities
diagonally
across
the
Zanker
Tasman
intersection
without
crossing
guards
is
really
an
unsafe
thing.
And
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
going
to
be
able
to
fill
these
positions
just
just
to
be
clear,
I
think
what
was
it?
E
What
at
least
what
I
intended
in
this
item?
And
this
was
not
necessarily
to
add
crossing
guards
where
we
don't
already
have
requests
for
them,
but
to
figure
out
how
to
do
to
fill
those
vacancies.
It
sounds
like
79
vacancies.
I
I
had
heard
62
when
I
asked
police
last
week,
but
the
number
somewhere
between
60
and
80
vacancies
and
I
think
I
really
liked
the
idea
that
we
put
in
here
of
engaging
School
communities
to
find
those
applicants
because,
as
councilman
Paula
said,
these
are
not
traditional
jobs.
E
E
Duty,
jobs
and
School
Playgrounds
during
lunch,
who
care
about
their
school
Community,
who
maybe
have
kids
or
grandkids
in
the
school
or
who
had
kids
in
the
school
and
want
to
give
back
and
make
a
little
bit
of
income
and
and
I
think
help
engaging
the
schools
in
helping
recruit,
crossing
guards
will
be
a
key
and
I.
Think
that's.
E
What
we
would
have
to
do
in
the
budget
process
to
fund
it
and
what
are
the
metrics
that
we
need
to
have
in
place
to
decide
what
should
be
done
and
what
shouldn't
be
done
and
I
I
guess
I
want
to
ask
you
John
right
now.
As
a
as
Council
offices,
we
often
get
some
input
from
the
community.
Here's
a
really
bad
Street.
We
want
to
do
some
improvement
here,
and
we
know
that
there's
a
certain
budget
available
for
us
to
do
a
few
improvements
a
year
that
weren't
necessarily
pre-planned.
H
So
yeah
council
member
John,
Russo
director
of
Transportation
council
member
you're
right.
We
we
have
we
work
with
every
one
of
the
council
districts
in
a
limited
budget
for
a
lot
of
small-scale
pedestrian
safety
enhancements,
as
well
as
what
councilman
problems
referring
to
larger
roadways
that
we're
trying
to
do
safety
projects
as
well.
That's
use
of
the
division,
zero,
the
bigger
arterials.
So
yes,
we
do.
We
respond
to
those
requests
for
a
speeding
problem
or
safety
around
a
school
or
better
Crossing
enhancements
and
those
kind
of
things.
H
But
what
we
do
is
we
actually
go
out
and
do
an
analysis
if
we
have
crash
data
which
we
have
in
many
many
parts
of
the
city
and
intersections
we'll
also
do
speed
and
volume
surveys
and
that's
a
physical
testing
of
the
roadway
to
see
where
how
fast
the
cars
are
going,
how
many
are
going
and
what,
where
they
are,
so
we
do
and
we
look
at
the
roadway
configurations
themselves,
how
many
driveways,
how
many
intersections
are
they
offset?
Are
they
regular
or
not,
and
then
we
do.
H
We
do
coordinate
that
within
whatever
budget
we
have
for
those
enhancements
and
then
we
implement
so
yes,
the
answer
to
your
question
is
we
do
that
all
the
time
we
use
certain
criteria?
We
make
engineering
judgments
of
safety
and
budget
and
preference
by
community
and
Council
offices
to
do
that.
That
kind
of
work,
same
sort
of
thing
would
be
done
for
this
new
program.
It's
just.
H
E
And
that's
always
the
way
it
is.
We
probably
could
all
come
up
with
a
whole
lot
of
things
we'd
like
to
see
in
our
district,
but
we
prioritize
every
year.
Here's
the
three
that
we
want
you
to
work
on
this
year,
I
think
also
similar
to
what
councilman
I
promise
asked
before
some
of
these
things
take
a
lot
longer
than
we
would
hope,
even
when
we
are
doing
them
through
this
current
process,
I
mean
so
you
know,
I'm,
not
necessary,
I.
E
E
E
And
I
would
I
would
argue
that
one
C
is
not
even
something
that
requires
all
that
much
work
at
all,
because
one
C
is
is
pretty
much
the
same
metrics
we
should
have
already
for
what
what
is
exists
or
what
we
do
out
there
when
we
have
concerns
with
traffic
in
any
site
in
our
city
or
with
speeding
or
any
other
safety
issues.
When
we
do
an
analysis.
H
E
I'm
not
saying
come
back
with
a
table
of
all
five
300
schools
and
tell
me
what
needs
to
be
done
at
all.
300
schools,
I'm,
saying
tell
me
what
the
remetric
will
be
so
that
if
a
school
comes
with
a
request,
we
know
what
we're
going
to
do
to
evaluate
the
request.
I
think
that's
what
I'd
like
to
see
in
1C-
and
maybe
my
colleagues
can
can
also
weigh
in
on
that
I'll.
Just
move
on
past.
That
point
I
mean
it's
not
worth
belaboring.
That
I
think.
E
The
important
thing
for
me
here
is
to
have
a
a
holistic
approach
with
our
school
districts
as
well
as
partner
and
have
them
be
partners.
Mission
zero
task
force
is
one
partner,
but
just
as
an
example,
I
found
out
from
the
superintendent
in
the
school
district
that,
where
I
served
on
the
board
that
they
are
now
spending
there's
going
out
with
their
executive
staff
and
their
school
district
and
spending
one
morning
at
each
School
in
the
district
and
watching
how
the
students
walk
to
school.
E
So
this
the
superintendent
and
the
assistant,
superintendents
and
other
staff
are
there
watching
students
walk
to
school
and
saying
hey
this
corner
over
here
looks
unsafe
to
me,
I
saw
cars,
you
know,
stop
being
too
late.
I
saw
risk
happening
over
here
and
they're,
making
a
list
and
they're
going
to
provide
me
with
that
list.
This
was
done
at
their
own
initiative.
This
wasn't
something
we
asked
them
to
do,
but
I
think
we
could
go
to
school
districts
and
say:
can
you
begin
to
do
an
analysis
in
your
own
School
District
as
well?
E
What
intersections
are
should
be
our
priority
so
that
we're
not
as
a
city
going
out
into
500
schools
and
having
to
do
all
that
work,
but
we
then
get
input.
Here's
in
within
this
school
district,
the
10
Corners
that
we
think
are
the
worst
and
then
with
the
council
office
and
the
Department
of
Transportation.
We
begin
to
work
on
those
specific
intersections
so
and
I'm
I
serve
and
I.
Think
councilmember,
Foley
and
I
served
together
on
the
school
City
collaborative
that
actually
has
its
next
meeting.
E
E
Can
you
be
our
eyes
and
ears
out
there
to
help
us
begin
to
prioritize
this,
so
the
city
be,
can
can
build
this
database
of
what
needs
to
be
done
without
needing
too
much
staff
time
from
City
to
go
out
and
actually
do
all
those
observations
and
then
that'd
be
those
become
the
prioritized
intersections
that
you
begin.
The
rest
of
your
normal
process
to
move
forward
is
that
yeah.
H
B
H
H
E
H
We
we've
moved
pretty
fast
in
our
Paving,
but
we
do
do
as
you
as
all
the
council
members
know,
we
do
modify
the
street
striping
and
some
other
things
on
that
roadway.
When
we
go
into
those
locations,
we
don't
do
it
on
every
road
every
year.
These
are
a
little
bit
more
significant
because
of
that
Community
engagement
petitioning
process.
H
We
we
really
coordinate
up
front,
which
ones
we
think
we
can
make
modification
of
two
so
for
a
coordinated
speed,
hump
program
we
would
have
to
get
through.
Quite
a
quite
a
bit
of
petitioning
Community
engagement.
Be
able
to
do
that
now
if
we
streamline
some
of
that
with
with
council
member
prowls
was
suggesting-
maybe
maybe
those
come
together
better,
but
it's
really
just
trying
to
match
things
up.
You
don't
want
to
slow
down
an
entire
program.
H
E
We
were
at
the
end
of
this
year's
process
already
so
what's
coming
next
year
and
and
saying
well,
which
ones
of
these
are
around
schools,
and
maybe
we
ought
to
put
a
little
bit
of
effort
into
those
right
now
because
they
are
already
on
the
schedule.
I
think
that's
kind
of
that
would
be
helpful
and
might
be
something
that
can
be
managed
under.
H
E
Right
well,
thank
you
for
for
answering
the
questions
and
I
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
at
least
my
intent
is
clear,
but
I.
Think
many
of
us
working
through
the
groups
that
we're
involved
with
can
get
can
engage
school
districts
and
helping
in
this
process
and
then,
as
Council
offices,
we
have
to
be
willing
to
prioritize
some
of
these
projects
near
schools
as
well.
E
One
of
the
projects
that
we
put
on
the
list
this
past
year
was
a
crosswalk
in
front
of
Morrell
Middle
School
along
a
main
road
right
along
Morrill,
where
people
just
aren't
stopping,
because
it's
one
of
the
old
crosswalks
people
can't
see
the
lights.
I
went
out
and
tried
it
and
the
cars
just
went
through
when
I
pushed
the
button.
We
got
it
on
the
list.
We
know
it's
still
it's
going
to
take
six
months
to
eight
months
before
it
gets
done,
but
we
moved
it
up.
E
We
prioritized
it
as
a
council
office
because
it's
near
a
school
I
would
hope
that
we
all
as
Council
offices
can
say
you
know
when
we,
when
we
use,
do
these
extra
projects
we're
going
to
have
to
let
we
should
probably
let
schools
cut
in
line
when
there
are
important
School,
improve
Transportation
improvements
that
need
to
keep
those
intersections
safe.
So
let's
leave
it
at
that
and
happy
just
happy
that
I
worked
with
my
colleagues
vice
mayor
and
the
mayor
and
councilmember
Foley
on
this
memo
and
appreciate
the
support.
D
Hi
we're
Beekman
here
interesting
meeting
today.
Thank
you,
I
hope.
The
future
of
streamlining
doesn't
it
revolves,
involves
road,
paving
issues
and
not
so
much
technology.
It's
my
sincere
hope
that
technology
you
can
talk
about
it
with
kids.
You
can
talk
about
open
public
policies
with
the
school,
kids
and
I,
think
that
is
so
holistic
and
sustainable.
It's
the
ideas
of
sustainability.
We're
really
striving
for
good
luck
on
those
efforts.
D
But
it's
from
the
questions
you
asked
about
technology,
it's
the
concepts
of
how
to
have
then
have
open
public
policies
and
accountable
practices
is
that's
so
key
and
that's
what
I'm
talking
about
is
the
hand
in
hand
process.
You
do
what
you
want
with
the
technology,
but
then
you
practice
the
good
stuff
with
it.
You
practice
how
to
have
Community
participation
and
dialogue,
not
just
simply
to
have
the
technology,
but
what
is
what
it's
there
for?
Do?
D
We
need
the
technology,
I
mean
more
responsible
questions,
then
start
being
asked
and
I'm
I'm
afraid,
that's
what
you're
a
bit
fearful
of
because
then
we
start
asking
questions
like
if
we
already
have
technology
in
place
around
schools.
Why
do
we
need
more?
You
know
we
don't
need
it
over
abundance
and
the
saturation
of
tech
I
mean
that's
the
sorts
of
things
we
need
to
be
striving
for,
and
responsible
practices
simply
follow
when
you
want
to
practice
good
ideals
and
good
civil
protection
ideas.
D
G
Yes,
Paul
soda
from
the
Horseshoe.
Thank
you
for
that
councilman
Cohen
I,
think
that
was
an
excellent
line
of
questioning.
I
was
very
surprised
at
some
of
the
pushback
that
you
were
getting
from
the
city,
but
that
was
completely
and
totally
in
alignment
with
what
it
is
that
I
was
talking
about
that
prioritization
between
the
school
districts
and
the
community
and
the
the
the
council.
So
thank
you
for
that.
G
I
want
to
talk
about
Breeze
of
innovation,
there's
a
lot
of
Buzz
around
that
going
being
placed
there
at
Cesar
Chavez
park.
Okay,
now
that
was
the
building
where
the
first
state
legislature
was
was,
was
tasked
in
bringing
in
manifest
destiny
and
that's
what
created
this
whole
system
of
inequality
that
we
have
here
today
in
this
city?
That's
never
been
amended
it
just
it
just
hasn't.
We
can't
get
into
semantics
or
get
into
opinions.
These
are
facts
from
that
time.
G
Nothing
has
been
amended
in
terms
of
the
racial
inequalities
here
in
this
city,
we're
using
language
to
try
to
do
it,
but
we're
not
creating
the
policies.
That's
going
to
give
it
the
strength
to
be
able
to
roll
back
and
to
amend
those
iniquities.
Okay,
those
are
going
to
take
Generations
okay.
Now
what
we're
talking
about
is
placing
that
breeze
of
innovation
right
in
the
center
of
where
that
was
created,
and
what
it
does
is
this
is.
G
It
creates
a
connection
between
what
Manifest
Destiny
did
by
putting
the
first
state
legislature
building
there
and
also
with
the
kind
of
manifest
destiny
2.0
with
manners-
that's
happening
in
this
city
now,
because
you're
going
to
have
thousands
and
thousands
of
people
that
are
going
to
have
to
move
out
of
here,
because
you're
having
400
000
people
moving
into
here.
Okay,
not
only
that
that
plaque
is
placed
there
by
the
native
sons
of
the
Golden
West
native
sons
of
the
Golden
West
were
the
primary
authors
of
the
Japanese
of
the
Japanese
exclusionary
act.
F
Hi
Martha
O'connell.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
vote
last
night
on
giving
the
mobile
home
park
designation
to
all
the
parks
in
San,
Jose
I
need
to
tell
you
that
I'm
really
upset
with
the
current
mayor
in
2014
I
spent
nearly
every
single
weekend
at
has
campaign
office
laying
on
a
mattress,
because
I
had
hurt
my
back
with,
with
a
telephone
on
my
stomach,
calling
thousands
and
thousands
of
mobile
home
park
residents
and
encouraging
them
to
vote
for
Sam
locardo.
F
This
was
based
on
personal
conversations.
He
had
with
me
committing
to
protect
keeping
the
parks
open.
Every
time
we
discuss
the
mobile
home
park,
designation,
which
hopefully
is
once
and
for
all,
been
settled.
Sam
brings
up
the
closure
ordinance
and
that's
that's
really
upsetting.
That
is
the
incorrect
Focus
I'm
not
concerned
with
that
I'm
concerned
with
keeping
the
parks
open,
and
there
was
a
recent
article
that
was
sent
to
me
that
talked
about
the
bulldozers
knocking
down
what
manufactured
homes
at
Winchester
Ranch.
F
So
I
don't
want
to
be
standing
there
watching
the
bulldozers
knock
down
my
home
and
have
Sam.
Tell
me
how
great
it
is
that
we
have
a
conversion,
ordinance
and
I'm
going
to
get
money
for
my
home.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
what
you
did
last
night
and
keep
your
eyes
on
the
prize,
which
is
keeping
the
parks
open.
Thank
you
very
much.