►
Description
City of San José, California
Joint meeting of Rules and Open Government / Committee of the Whole of September 29, 2021
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=890598&GUID=84B58357-BB96-4F2C-BDB8-023F6C6EDEB3
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
C
C
You
know
I
mean
the
concern
that
I
have
in
terms
of
the
whole
business
of
our
city,
to
look
at
the
whole
city
and
the
whole
agenda
as
I've
been
coming
to
all
the
meetings,
so
I
feel
like
it's
the
curtain
that
I'm
getting
to
see
behind
how
our
city
works,
and
one
of
the
things
that
I
was
seeing
in
is
how
important
our
office
of
economic
development
is-
and
you
know
in
regards
to
to
get
back
on
to
the
issue
of
this
particular
meeting
of
of
whatever
the
next
meeting
october
6..
Thank.
C
Okay,
thank
you
sweetheart
and
then
so
what
is
connected
to
that
is
on
the
calendar
or
on
our.
Our
agenda
is
talking
about
our
climate.
You
know
our
climate,
smart,
you
know
our
climate
crisis
and
the
problem
is:
is
that
we're
not
talking
about
our
climate
crisis
enough
and
we're?
You
know
we're
not
giving
enough
when
I
look
at
behind
the
scenes
of
all
the
economic
developments
all
about
economic
development,
and
yet
we
really
need
somebody
who's
about
d
growth.
We
need
somebody
on
our
city
council,
not
nancy
klein,
not
economic
development.
C
It
has
to
be
somebody
maybe
paid,
maybe
unpaid,
that
deals
with
d
growth,
because
that's
where
we
need
to
go.
We
need
to
go
back
to
nature
because
you
know,
and
back
to
our
agricultural
roots
really
or
we
won't
be
here
on
the
planet
and
the
very
sad
news
today
is:
we
have
lost
22
species
22,
including
this
beautiful
woodpecker
and
so
back
back
to
climate
change.
C
That's
what
we're
talking
about
climate
smart
needs
to
be
a
lot
smarter,
because
things
are
going
down
so
fast
and
that
we
will
either
have
a
an
uncontrolled
demolition
or
a
controlled
demolition,
and
we
much
rather
have
a
controlled
demolition.
So
we
need
to
put
all
our
resources
into
our
climate.
Smart
and
you
know
so
that
we
have.
D
Hi
blair
beekman
here
happy
wednesday,
happy
ending
september.
I'm
I'm
to
comment
to
try
to
add
to
tess's
words
about
climate
issues.
You
have
an
item
on
the
october
5th
agenda
about
green
well
about
sjc,
community
energy
and
how
it
can
be
moving
forward
in
this
next
fall
and
coming
year.
D
Good
luck
in
the
efforts
how
to
do
that!
I
I'm
really
hopeful.
You
know
I,
as
I've
been
saying
you're
doing
some
really
good
work
at
the
state
level.
Good
luck,
how
we
mine
the
store
and
how
we
work
with
our
local
community
level.
I
guess
you're
trying
to
address
issues
at
this
time.
Thank
you
to
make
you
know.
D
Purchasing
plans
accessible
and
understandable
to
the
public
can
be
the
simplest
way
to
do
that
and
and
to
make
them
renewable
ideas
and
to
really
make
a
good
pitch
about
you
know.
This
is
a
time
to
set
up
our
good
renewable
future.
D
You
know,
there's
been
a
big
fight
that
we
need
to
set
up
our
fossil
fuel,
future
and
economy
at
this
time
as
ways
to
like,
perhaps
as
work
as
a
hedge
against
any
upcoming
natural
disasters,
and
that
we
need
fossil
fuels
and
the
time
of
natural
disaster,
for
you
know
its
generator
use
and
stuff.
But
it's
my
feeling
if
we
make
that
a
small
limited
sense
and
we
use
it
just
for
its
limited
time
of
a
natural
disaster.
D
We
if
we
have
good,
prepared
practices
for
renewable
energies.
Now
we
can
transition
back
to
these
good
practices
after
the
time
of
emergency
and
that's
planning,
that's
planning
positively
for
just
to
continue
our
good
practices
of
our
good
future
and
that
good
future
is
not
nuclear.
It
is
solar
power.
We
can
do
a
lot
with
solar
power.
Let's
just
talk
about
this
openly
prepare
now
and
thank
you.
A
B
B
B
Release
date
for
study
session
and
we're
gonna
go
to
the
public.
First
tesla
go
ahead.
C
I
think
that
study
session
was
on
our
climate,
our
climate
work
that
we're
doing
with
our
smart.
You
know
san
jose
smart
climate,
so
you
know
right.
I
really
appreciate
what
blair
was
saying
is
definitely
preparedness
in
regards
to.
We
need
to
be
on
that
kind
of
when
you're
in
a
crisis.
That's
all
you
talk
about,
and
so
and
you
only
think
about
and
prepare
for
it,
and
we
need
to
do
that
and
not
just
words,
blah
blah
blah
but
really
actions,
and
so
what
we
need
is
to
be.
C
You
know
in
that
mode
of
preparing,
and
it
is
I
appreciate
what
blair
said
not
nuclear
our
future
needs
to
be
just
solar
or
wind,
really
just
renewable,
not
even
our
our.
You
know.
Our
water
power
is
working
under
our
drought
conditions,
so
it's
really
getting
into
a
much
more
hyper
local
reality,
and
that's
where
you
know
all
of
our
buildings
really
should
be
off-grid
solar
and
that
we
have
battery
backup.
C
And
then
we
also
need-
and
something
I
talked
about
in
the
in
the
smart
climate
group
meeting-
was
that
we
need
a
battery
backup
so
that
we
don't
have
to
be
dealing
with
pg
e
and
all
at
all.
Because
pg
e
is,
you
know
even
now,
and
when
the
power
goes
down,
our
green
power
goes
down,
but
not
if
you're
off
grid,
we
need
to
be
off
grid.
C
We
need
to
get
away
from
the
grid,
because
the
grid
is
part
of
the
problem
in
terms
of
our
transmission
lines
and
that's
where
so
many
of
our
fires
are
started
because
that's
where
the
transmission
lines
are
up
in
the
hydroelectric
in
the
piney
woods
of
the
sierras,
and
so
we
need
to
be
hyper
local
with
our
energy
generation
and
have
a
ability
for
backup
to
be
a
battery.
A
community
battery
is
what
my
husband
says.
B
Thank
you
tessa,
and
I'm
assuming
that
you
were
actually
speaking
to
the
next
item,
and
so
when
the
next
item
comes
up,
you
have
already
spoken
to
it.
Go
ahead:
blair,
you're
next.
D
B
All
right
and
well,
that's
the
end
of
the
public
comments,
bring
it
back
to
the
committee
I'll
move.
B
All
right!
The
next
item
is
the
climate.
Smart,
san
jose
special
meeting,
we're
going
to
go
to
the
public,
go
ahead,
blair.
D
Hi,
thank
you
for
this
item.
Hopefully,
if
you
can,
hopefully
you
can
allow
tesla
to
speak.
Cause
she's
been
working
hard
on
these
issues
and
she
may
have
gotten
confused
on
the
last
item
to
try
to
speak
a
little
bit
for
her
these
items.
D
We
also
talk
about
these
items
at
the
end
of
the
meeting
on
h
a
she
can
speak
at
that
time
too
as
well.
Possibly
I
had
real
concerns
with
this
item
that
that,
with
item
that
you're
you're
pulling
the
work
plan
away,
you're
not
going
to
show
that
to
the
public
anymore,
it's
great
you're
going
to
have
this
meeting.
D
You
know
this
climate,
smart
meeting
or
climate
change-
I
I
don't
quite
know
its
term,
but
a
good
climate
meeting
at
early
november,
climate
planning
but
you're
taking
away
its
its
smart
work
plan
or
its
work
plan,
and
I
don't
know
why
that
is.
I
it's
important
to
share
the
information
publicly
and
we
can
hear
it
and
understand
it,
but
we
need
to
see
it
in
writing
and
we
need
to
see
what
what
you
know
the
steps
will
be
for
the
future
planning.
I
don't
quite
understand
why
that's
happening.
D
Hopefully
that
can
be
explained.
Hopefully
kerry,
romanov's
ideas
of
the
tree
issue
is
being
resolved
and
addressed,
and
I
think
you
know
she
offered
some
good
academic
logic
that
it
just
felt
a
little
uncomfortable
and
something
wasn't
quite
right
about
it.
I
know
we're
dealing,
possibly
with
issues.
I
talk
about
earthquake,
but
you
know
it
by
2023.
D
We
may
not
be
quite
fully
ready
to
be
doing
good
practices,
yet
it
may
be
until
2025
after
any
major
earthquake
events
that
we
start
talking
about.
You
know
real
planning
features
for
ourselves
how
we
work
that
period
out
of
this
time,
we're
starting
to
figure
that
out
with
the
housing
issues,
good
luck,
how
we
can
talk
about
this
openly
and
if
an
earthquake
is
actually
coming.
Let's
talk
about
it
openly
and
prepare
openly,
so
we
won't
be
confused.
D
Thank
you
and
hopefully
talk
to
you
later
about
this
issue.
Thank
you.
A
B
You
brian.
G
Thank
you
vice
mayor,
just
real
quick,
I
sent
the
mayor
a
whole
bunch
of
videos
about,
and
it
does
have
to
go
with
the
work
plan
for
the
smart
city
about
the
3d
printing
homes.
The
more
I
look
into
this
technology.
I
think
it
really
has
a
lot
of
potential
for
eliminating
huge
amounts
of
costs.
They
were
building
homes
between
four
and
ten
thousand
dollars
that
were
between
nine
and
fourteen
hundred
square
foot,
fully
electric
two
bedroom,
three
bedroom,
all
outfitted.
G
They
were
using
rice
and
mud
and
different
parts
to
mix
the
cement,
and
I
don't
have
the
whole
thing
down.
Pat
I'm
going
to
try
to
contact
some
of
that.
I
don't
want
to
take
too
much
time.
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
this
is
being
brought
up,
but
I
think
we
have
to
not
only
think
outside
the
box.
We
have
to
get
rid
of
the
box
and
try
to
think
globally
and
environmentally,
but
also
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
technology.
That's
available
out
there.
G
B
Thank
you,
brian
louise.
H
Hi
good
afternoon,
my
name
is
louise
bedsworth,
I'm
the
land
use
program
director
at
the
center
for
law,
energy
and
environment
at
uc,
berkeley,
school
of
law
prior
to
joining
the
center
for
law,
energy
and
the
environment.
I
served
as
executive
director
of
the
california
strategic
growth
council
and
I'm
just
interested
that
in
both
of
these
roles,
I've
paid
very
close
attention
to
the
work
that's
happening
in
san
jose,
which
is
really
setting
a
model
for
integrated
an
integrated
land
use
strategy
to
advance
climate
action.
H
So
I
really
just
wanted
to
congratulate
the
city
on
the
incredible
work
that
you're
doing
and
the
bold
action
that's
being
proposed
for
this
november
8th
study
session.
Achieving
carbon
neutrality
is
going
to
be
absolutely
essential
for
avoiding
the
worst
impacts
of
climate
change.
At
the
november
8th
study
session,
I
encourage
the
city
to
ful,
continue
to
fully
integrate
land
use,
including
the
role
of
natural
working
lands
as
part
of
the
city's
climate
strategy.
H
A
I
A
B
D
For
my
public
comment,
a
public
record,
I
spoke
about
the
hopes
of
how
we
can
continue
to
talk
about
the
reimagined
process
in
the
future
of
the
city
charter
process.
City
manager,
mcguire
has
jennifer.
Mcguire
has
has
laid
out
a
letter
where
she
felt
that
the
direction
of
the
charter
process
was
not
going
quite
quite
in
the
right
way,
and
I
I
think
we
just
need
to
do
some
readjustments
in
real
tooling
about
what
the
charter
commission
can
be
talking
about.
D
But
I
think
we
can
continue
the
practices
and
and
language
and
and
ideas
about
reimagine
and
how
it
relates
to
equity
and
how
it
relates
to
open
democracy
and
how
it
relates
to
ideas
of
green,
sustain
sustainability
and
even
futures
of
baloney
land
trust
issues
in
the
future
and
alone
values.
Is
it's
really
interesting
work,
that's
starting
to
develop
and
we're
talking
about
community
issues,
we're
no
longer
talking
about.
You
know
the
mayor
and
and
a
small
group
of
rich
developers.
D
So
we've
made
a
really
interesting
change.
I
hope
we
can
continue
those
good
efforts
and
just
be
very
open
to
what
the
subject
of
community
and
the
future
of
the
charter
can
be
about.
I
think
that's
it's
a
good
direction,
we're
understanding
and
I
hope
we
can
continue
that.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
tessa,
I'm
assuming
you're,
going
to
speak
to
your
letter.
B
C
Oh,
it
was
okay,
oh
okay!
Well
that
was
good
because,
oh
thank
you
for
reminding
me.
That's
so
sweet
of
you,
because
the
what
I
was
going
to
comment
was
on
the
other
letters.
That
was
the
villa
montana
and
the
issues
of
that.
But
you
know
related
to
that
letter.
Is
that
they're
they're
asking
for
more
community
input?
C
You
know
that
they
want
to
be
engaged
more
and
even
deb
davis
was
talking
yesterday
about
wanting
to
have
more
public
engagement
and
putting
out
something
to
even
vote
on
even
that
level
of
engagement
and
that
that's
where
I'm
having
trouble
with
the
decisions
that
have
been
made
in
my
neighborhood
and
that
we
don't
want
a
hotel
and
so
and
the
reason
you
know
connecting
it
to
my
own
letter,
which
I'm
saying
that
we
need
to
say
focus
on
climate
crisis
on
our
climate
crisis
is
that
you
know
with
that
focus
which
is
the
growth
and
that
that
is
the
focus.
C
So
then,
when
you
have
a
hotel
proposed,
then
that's
covering
up
land
that
can
be
used
for
food
production
and
when,
when
you
have
a
property
that
actually
has
no.
No,
nothing
built
on
it's
just
mostly
a
parking
lot
at
615
stockton
that
the
the
goal
is
that
all
those
lands
would
be
quickly
converted
into
food
production
and
because
it's
easy
to
do
and
that's
you
know
even
mayor
licardo
when
you're
talking
about
building
on
the
river.
He
says:
oh
well,
that
was
a
parking
lot.
C
So
no
big
deal
that
we
put
a
16
story,
apartment
on
it
or
whatever
it
is
oh
actually
office
building.
But
the
really
problem
was
that
we
even
put
a
parking
lot
on
it
to
begin
with.
So
that's
not
an
excuse.
Two
wrongs
don't
make
a
right
and
we
have
to
start
degrowth,
and
that
is
that
we
need
to
be
growing
food
everywhere
and
the
the
only
other
thing
that
we,
you
know
the
other
problem
we
have
is,
of
course
our
housing.
B
Thank
you
bringing
it
back
to
the
committee.
F
A
B
D
All
right,
thanks
mayor,
I
mean
thanks
vice
mayor
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
comment
on
the
domestic
violence.
I
guess
it's
gonna
be
some
sort
of
get
together
of
some
sort
event,
lighting
event,
ceremony
and
awareness
event
at
the
tower
in
rotunda
I
to
offer
you
know,
ideas
of
awareness,
I'm
really
interested
in
in
council
person,
perala's
ideas
of
gun
safety
at
this
time
and
how
it
can
relate
to
the
domestic
violence
issues.
D
That
very
much
you
know
is
considering
the
events
of
vta
and,
I
think,
can
be
a
very
agreeable
subject
matter
for
all
sides
to
be
considering
how
we
talk
about
the
future
of
events
that
happen
as
a
vta
so
for
for
councilman
person
perales
in
this
new
work
effort
to
be
you
know,
talking
with
council
person,
arenas
and
all
the
good
work
she's
been
doing
all
these
years
on
domestic
violence
issues.
D
That
can
be
a
really
good
connection,
and
you
know
it
seems
like
it
has
the
makings.
It
can
be
that
good
luck,
what
you
can
the
work
you
can
do
together
and
and
to
always
continue
good
work
of
a
council
person
uranus
with
these
issues,
and
I
guess
I
guess
that's
about
all.
I
think
I
I
got
20
seconds
here
to
I
I
wanted
to
to
add.
Oh
yeah.
I
hope
my
my
from
my
end.
I
hope
we
can
continue
to
work
on
from
the
good
practices
of
a
peer
pressure.
D
I
mean
our
peer
review
program,
ideas
with
the
police
with
domestic
violence
issues.
I
hope
we
can
learn
how
that
can
grow
to
other
parts
of.
C
Okay,
hold
on
yeah,
I'm
a
little
confused
like
the
consent
calendar
as
you
look
at
it
on
the
rules,
I
guess
that's
related
to
the
agenda.
The
original
agenda
of
the
of
the
council
meeting
is
that
true,
the
it
looks
at
the
consent
of
the
account
of
the
anyway.
It
looks
like
that's
what
it
is,
so
I
was
going
to
look
at
the
consent
calendar
and
it
was
talking
about
well
efficiency.
It
was
talking
about
climate
efficiency
that
we're
going
to
look
into
that,
and
then
blair
was
mentioning
about
domestic
violence.
C
So
the
issue
that
I
was
going
to
bring
up
about
that
is
in
my
plan,
of
what
I
envision
about
how
we
need
to
live.
We
need
to
not
live
alone,
and
you
know
when
we
think
about
homelessness.
What.
C
Okay,
good
yeah
domestic
violence,
so
I
am
talking
about
that
then,
okay,
good,
so
I
wasn't
talking
about
domestic
violence,
because
what
I'm
saying
is
that
I
think
that
we
don't.
I
guess,
you're
saying
that
you
need
two
people
to
have
domestic
violence.
What
I'm
saying
is
that
you
know
when
we're
creating
these
isolated
homeless
rooms,
homes.
Even
these
small
transitional
homes.
I
think
we
are.
C
We
are
social
beings,
and
so,
when
we're,
you
know
when
I'm
thinking
about
housing
that
we
could
develop,
that
would
deal
with
homelessness
and
then
you
know,
hopefully
preventing
domestic
violence
is
that
we
live
with
teachers
that
are
helping
us
and
it
has
to
be
a
24
7..
That's
what
I'm
thinking
is
that
you
know
when
we
live
isolated.
Even
in
our
you
know,
nuclear
family
issues.
C
You
know
we
need
to
have
more
social
beings
around
us,
and
so,
when
we
that's,
what
I'm
saying
is
that
we
build
housing
with
homeless
and
and
housed
people,
but
the
house
people
would
be
teachers
and
that
we'd
be
you
know,
learning
to
live
without
fossil
fuels.
So
when
we
build
infrastructure
for
homeless
or
in
the
future,
at
all,
no
no
car
infrastructure
and
it's
also
a
garden
because
nature,
heals
and
that's
the
healing
from
domestic
violence
is
nature.
Heal.
B
Thank
you,
brian.
G
Thank
you
vice
mayor
and
I
agree
with
tessa
and
blair.
Also
the
domestic
violence
is
a
terrible
situation
and
we
are
social
creatures,
and
we
do
need
these
kind
of
these
events
that
not
only
raise
awareness,
but
let
us
know
that
we're
not
alone
and
the
more
we
can
get
out.
The
information
of
help
helplines
online
counseling
interventions,
neighbors
watching
out
for
neighbors,
not
spying
on
everybody,
about
every
little
thing,
but
I'll
be
watching
out
for
neighbors,
get
on
to
the
documentary
and
also
helping
out
I
don't
have.
B
In
with
him
too
hold
on
for
a
second,
can
everybody
put
their
okay
mike's
on
me?
Thank
you.
I
don't
need
any.
G
Extra
time,
vice
versa,
I'm
fine,
so
the
I
really
think
that
it
would
be
very
helpful
to
combine
that
and
I
think
what
tess
was
trying
to
say
and
I'm
thinking
I'm
getting.
What
blair
and
tess
are
trying
to
say
is
if
we
incorporate
groups
of
people
that
can
help
each
other.
You
know
instead
of
one
section
live
over
here
and
one
section
live
over
here.
That
offers
a
very
a
stronger
foundation
and
I
think
that's
what
the
this
event
is
trying
to
do.
Thank
you.
Vice
mayor.
F
B
No
worries
all
right,
tony.
A
B
Okay,
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
compassionate
san,
jose
bold
housing
solutions
and
before
I
go
to
the
public,
I'm
gonna
go
to
the
staff
lee.
Do
you
want
to
speak
to
this
in
the
early
consideration
form
and
what
our
decision
frame
our
decision
for
us.
A
A
As
you
can
see
from
your
packet,
all
items
are
green
light
pending
budgetary
action
that
the
council
will
take
on
november,
2nd
related
to
the
arp
rebalancing,
as
well
as
all
of
our
rebalancing
from
the
influx
of
funds
coming
in,
and
we
were
doing
that
as
part
of
the
roadmap
exercise
that
we
committed
to
in
june
to
fully
fund
emergency
housing
construction
operations,
as
well
as
the
beautif,
as
well
as
sheltering
enhanced
encampment
services
as
part
of
that
exercise.
A
C
That
is
what
I
was
thinking
about,
and
so,
when
I
hear
all
this
money
is
coming
in
for
our
you
know,
housing
from
our
federal
dollars
and
state
dollars,
I
guess
it's
really
state
right
now
with
gavin
newsom.
Thank
you,
gavin
newsom,
and
you
know
saying
that,
basically,
you
know.
So
what
I
want
to
do
is
buy
that
property
at
615
and
have
integrate
and
a
6-1-5
stockton
avenue,
so
it
doesn't
become
a
hotel.
C
So
that's
the
motive
motivating
force
because,
like
I
say,
climate
action
is
local
action
and
if
all
of
us
would
have
actually
at
one
point
in
our
in
our
lives
in
our
you
know,
ancestors
lives
stop
the
things
that
are
in
our
community
right
now.
We
wouldn't
have
a
as
horrific
of
a
neighborhood
as
I
have
where
I
live
across
from
a
diesel
bus
depot
and
a
cement
factory.
So
I'm
saying
I
don't
I
don't
want
a
hotel.
So
what
I'm
envisioning
is.
C
I
want
housing
because
that's
that
is
the
vision
of
what
we
need
and
we
need
companion
gardens
to
to
grow
food
and
to
become
a
strong
neighborhood.
So
you
have
a
commons.
So
you
do
know
your
neighbors,
and
the
thing
is:
is
that
the
way
I
picture
it
is
that
we,
it
would
be
three
stories
with
one
story:
underground:
no
cement
basements.
My
husband
has
figured
out
how
to
use
pressure
treated
wood
to
create
a
full
full
basement
so
that
we
have
to
get
away
from
cement.
C
It's
a
big
fossil,
it's
a
big
greenhouse
gas
emitter,
and
so
we
have
to
so.
If
we
build
these
four
stories
in
a
small
footprint
and
we
have
homeless
people
with
teachers
living
together,
24
7
and
it
could
be
almost
75.
People
could
be
in
three
buildings
and
there'd
be
no
car
infrastructure.
So
there
wouldn't
be
problems
in
the
community.
Because
that's
what
everybody
complains
cars
problem.
We
got
to
get
away
from
cars
and
then,
of
course,
it's
built
in
a
green
way.
D
Hi
blair
beekman
here
this
is
a
kind
of
an
interesting
item.
I'm
a
bit
hurt
and
confused
about
the
last
item
about
a
drug
treatment
facility
as
we're
starting
and
gearing
up
towards.
It
sounds
like
a
new
way
to
talk
about
housing
and
homeless
issues.
For
as
much
as
you
know,
drugs
can
be
connected
to
housing
issues.
I
think
it
would
maybe
just
a
little
more.
I
don't
know
decent
and
progressive.
D
I
don't
know
what
what
other
caring
to
learn,
how
to
use
the
language
that
you
know
we
can
talk
about
drug
facility,
treatment,
centers
and
and
such,
but
make
that
a
separate
item
compared
to
you
know
other
housing
needs.
I
people
don't
like
to
be
lumped
into.
You
know
these
sort
of
categories.
D
I
sure
don't,
and
I
don't
know
I
did
just
to
mention
that
at
this
time.
Otherwise
you
know
good
luck
to
these
programs.
You
know
if
we,
if
we
do
our
really
good
established
good
practices
already
and
if
we
really
responsibly
budget
things
and
realize
that
we
got
a
ton
of
new
subsidy
coming
in
that
and
funding
that
we
got
to
be
really.
D
You
know
responsible
about
if
we
do
our
good
stuff
first
or
the
stuff
we
know
best
and
do
well,
then
we
can
start
to
consider
the
experimental
stuff
a
bit
more
and-
and
it
just
seems
we
have
to
learn
how
to
do
that
compassionately
and
we
don't
have
to
bunch
everything
together.
We
can
separate
and
still
do
these
things,
so
good
luck.
How
to
do
that.
I
think
that
maybe
should
be
a
goal.
D
It's
certainly
a
goal
I
can
talk
over
with
you
know
the
more
progressive
council
persons
and
and
see
what
they
say
and
feel
good
luck.
How
we
work
on
this
and
I
hope
yeah
this-
can
be
a
whole
community
effort.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
brian.
G
Thank
you
vice
mayor
yeah.
I
think
it
of
course,
obviously
agree
with
the
compassionate
and
just
as
the
other
two
wonderful
speakers
said,
making
sure
that
we
focus
on
the
compassionate
side
of
it
and
maybe,
like
blair,
was
saying
the
terminology
would
be
better
more
effective
if
it
wasn't
if
it
didn't
label
people,
because
we
all
struggle
with
our
our
situations
and
a
lot
of
it.
Some
of
us
struggle
privately,
but
it's
the
same
thing.
I
think
you
know
what
I'm
trying
to
say.
Thank
you.
Vice
mayor.
J
Yes,
I'm
the
manager
of
the
guadalupe
community
garden
and
also
the
mayor's
task
force
for
the
river
and-
and
I
would
love
to
see
this
go
into
effect.
I
live
it,
breathe
it
smell
it
and
deal
with
it
on
every
single
level
and
without
enough
homes
and
facilities.
There's
no
way
we
can
solve
the
problem
over
by
the
river
and
or
the
columbus
park
area.
In
addition,
the
12
years
I've
managed
that
I've
had
to
deal
with
a
lot
of
mental
health
issues,
a
lot
of
not
mine,
drug
alcohol
and
everything
else.
J
So
with
right
now
we
only
have
somewhere
in
the
neighborhood
of
12,
to
15
mental
health
beds
that
people
can
go
stay
at
to
get
get
at
least
the
process
started.
So
it's
very
important
that
we
have
additional
forces
out
there
for
the
mental
health
also
I'll
throw
in
drug
and
alcohol,
even
though
it's
not
on
the
agenda
right
this
moment,
and
certainly
we
need
more
housing
so
to
get
a
thousand
versus
what
we're
looking
at
now
would
be
magnificent.
J
J
If
we
get
a
head
start
and
at
least
get
people
in
give
them
some
pride
and
then
also
perhaps
make
them
park
advocate
and
clean.
You
know
have
a
job
and
clean
it
and
stuff.
I
think
we
can
move
forward
and
moving
forward
at
this
point
in
time
would
be
wonderful.
The
last
two
days
while
they're
moving
everybody,
it's
been
an
absolute
nightmare.
Thank
you.
I'll
receive
the
30
seconds.
K
Hi
good
afternoon,
thank
you.
First
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
all
the
council
members
that
sign
on
to
this
memorandum.
Thank
you
so
much
for
taking
this
on.
I
do
have
to
say
it's
not
a
disaster,
the
cleaning
at
what
bob
just
said.
I
can't
believe
he
said
that
it's
been
a
wonderful
cleanup
and
it's
gone
very
smoothly.
I've
been
out
there
every
single
day,
so
I
I
don't
know
what
he
meant
by
that
and
a
lot
more
people
want
to
be
inside.
K
He
said
less
than
75,
I
would
say
a
lot
higher
than
that
want
to
be
inside,
but
I'm
really
excited
my
council.
District
d9
needs
some
housing
for
the
unhoused,
but
I'm
concerned
about
the
length
and
how
long
it's
going
to
take.
We
do
have
these
folks
that
are
getting
abated
and
at
columbus
and
there's
no
place
for
them
to
go.
That's
the
bottom
line.
I've
been
talking
about
this
for
months
now
and
at
phase
three
next
year.
K
We
need
to
have
something
for
all
these
folks,
so
they're,
going
to
end
up
on
the
on
the
creek.
You
know
the
guadalupe
and
nobody's
going
to
be
happy
because
nobody
is
doing
anything
right
now.
We
need
to
get
some
more
housing
more
motels.
Now,
and
I
say
now
I
mean
you
know
for
the
end
of
the
year,
so
please
this
is
wonderful.
K
I
thank
you,
but
you
have
to
think
of
the
big
picture
and
the
big
picture
is
what's
gonna
happen
when
everybody
is
in
phase
three
and
where
are
they
gonna
go
they're
gonna
go
down
to
the
guadalupe
or
into
your
neighborhood,
like
I've
been
saying,
so
this
is
very
important
that
we
get
this
done
before
june
of
2022.
B
L
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
good
to
see
you
all,
I'm
happy
that
you
guys
are
all
carrying
the
laboring
or
they're
on
the
rules
committee.
Thank
you
for
the
many
hours
you've
invested
and-
and
I
hope
you
don't
hate
me
for
jumping
off.
In
any
event,
I
I
want
to
say
thanks
for
considering
this
memo.
I
know
many
of
you
have
been
working
on
these
many
issues.
I
think
all
of
you
have
been
for
many
months
now.
L
What
we're
proposing
here
is
trying
to
accelerate
the
work
to
take
advantage
of
a
confluence
of
opportunities,
and
let
me
just
start
by
by
you
know,
answering
the
question
opportunity
to
do
what
and
the
one
is:
how
can
we
rapidly
expand
the
inventory
of
rapid
build
apartments?
This
is
a
term
I
just
invented.
L
L
There's
a
lot
of
things
about
a
shelter
that
doesn't
appeal
to
plenty
of
our
unhoused,
including
concerns
about
safety,
about
bringing
pets
about
having
places
to
put
stuff,
on
the
other
hand,
offering
a
private
apartment
is
different
and
we're
seeing
real
results
as
a
result
of
what
we've
already
done
just
in
the
last
year
together.
L
So
I
I
I
wanted
to
point
out
that
the
unique
confluence
of
opportunities
that
we
have
in
this
moment
to
be
considering
this
kind
of
acceleration.
You
know.
First,
we
have
some
proven
success
of
a
pilot
that
we
launched
at
the
beginning
of
this
pandemic
to
get
three
rapid
bill
apartment
communities
up
and
running
in
council,
member
jimenez
and
councilmember
davis
district,
and
they
are
now
full.
L
I
think,
councilmember
davis,
I
think
just
has
a
couple
vacancies
of
filling
in
a
matter
of
days
and
we've
got
more
than
300
folks
who
are
housed
and
we're
hearing.
Very
positive
feedback,
so
we
think
we've
got
something
that
works
and
equally
important
is
something
we
can
build
relatively
quickly
in
a
matter
of
months
rather
than
years,
and
we
can
build
it
at
a
small
fraction
of
what
costs
typically
to
build
apartment
buildings
at
perhaps
a
hundred
hundred
ten
thousand
dollars
a
unit.
Secondly,
we
have
a
confluence
of
opportunity
from
enthusiasm
of
donors.
L
L
We
think
that's
because
folks
are
seeing
that
there
is
something
here
that
there's
real
interest
in
this
rapid
build
concept.
As
we
try
to
tackle
our
homelessness
crisis,
we
are
now
seeing
real
interest
from
the
county.
Just
yesterday,
the
board
approved
a
commitment
of
40
million
dollars
for
these
rapid
build
projects
they're,
I
think,
they're
seeing
what's
happening
here,
and
then
there
was
a
project
in
mountain
view
as
well.
That's
gotten
a
lot
of
interest.
We
have
a
lot
of
interest
now
from
caltrans.
L
The
director
talks
of
michigan
who's
been
very
collaborative
and
district
four
director,
as
well,
in
helping
us
identify
sites
and
expand
our
potential
universe
of
sites,
and
we
have
one-time
dollars
in
this
moment
that
we
didn't
have
before
dollars.
We
can
really
use
to
do
something
impactful
and
of
course
we
know
some
of
those
dollars
are
still
federal
dollars.
Arpa.
We
have
dollars,
of
course,
they're
made
available
through
the
state.
L
I
was
advocating,
obviously
with
as
many
other
mayors
for
that
hap
funding,
and
so
we
have
a
lot
of
one-time
dollars
and
we
know
they're
not
going
to
be
there
for
a
sustainable
solution.
So
the
question
is:
what
can
we
do?
That's
impactful
in
the
short
run
now
there
are
two
very
big
challenges
to
all
this
and
I
think
staff
will
be
the
first
to
point
these
out
because
I
know
they
routinely
point
them
out
to
me,
and
these
challenges
are
real.
L
The
two
challenges
are
sights
and
sustainability
and-
and
the
question
is
how
are
we
gonna
tackle
this
differently?
Given
all
the
challenges
we've
had
with
a
list
of
100
sites
and
on
and
on
I
say
with
regard
to
sites,
you
know
there
are
two
different
approaches.
We're
proposing
here.
One
is
to
really
expand
the
universe
in
our
search
for
sites,
and
we
have
some
example
of
that,
for
example,
the
roof
ferrari
site.
Councilman's
district
really
emerged
because
of
our
ongoing
collaboration
with
caltrans.
L
We
are
looking
now
with
experienced
developers
and
caltrans
at
building
in
the
middle
of
freeway
cloverly,
something
we
never
thought
was
possible
before
we
don't
know
for
sure
it
is
possible.
We
want
to
make
sure
we
can
do
it
very
safely,
so
we'll
be
very
focused
on
that,
but
we're
looking
at
that
now.
How
could
we
con
imagine
how
we
could
expand
the
opportunity
to
build
housing
if
we
were
looking
that
creatively
at
the
use
of
land
using
looking
at
private
land
sites?
L
Parking
lots
with
incentives
are
suggested
here,
working
with
the
county.
Now
that
they're
interested
they're
going
to
be
taking
tours
of
these
facilities
very
soon
appreciate,
supervisor,
cindy
chavez
and
her
interests
and
and
obviously
supervisor,
simian
and
and
lee
and
their
commitment
of
and
pushing
forward
funding,
and
we
hope
that
maybe
this
could
be
contagious
for
other
public
agencies,
water
district,
others.
L
So
we
know
and
vta's
been
a
partner
in
the
past,
so
we
think
there's
an
opportunity
to
really
expand
the
potential
number
of
sites
that
we
can
look
at,
so
we're
not
just
sort
of
stuck
with
the
same
list
of
a
hundred
where
staffs
have
beaten
their
head
against
the
wall,
then.
Secondly,
we're
trying
a
different
approach
around
how
we're
going
to
identify
these
sites
working
really
starting
with
the
council,
members
and
and
the
mayor.
That
is
all
of
us
right.
L
What
we've
seen
now
in
in
councilman
davis's
district,
yes,
we're
paralysis,
district
in
a
site,
that's
going
to
be
under
construction
soon,
councilmember,
mayhem's
district
and
the
site
we
think
will
be
under
construction
within
just
a
few
weeks
potentially
is
is
when
we
can
really
have
council
members,
leaning
in
working
with
the
community
and
as
councilman
jimenez
is
doing
now
on
on
the
safe
parking
sites.
L
We
may
be
able
to
accelerate
this
work
and
it's
different
than
simply
telling
staff
to
go
out
there
and
and
sort
of
dump
the
problem
on
them
and
have
them,
beat
the
head
against
the
wall
and
try
to
explain
to
the
community
how
how
this
is
going
to
get
built.
We
know
if
there's
a
mandate
that
we
all
agree
on
that
we're
all
going
to
work
together
on.
We
I'd
like
to
believe
we
can
get
this
done.
L
We've
seen
it
done
very
effectively
in
sacramento
and
la
in
the
same
way
that
I've
proposed
in
this
memorandum,
which
is
we
bring
all
the
sites
together
to
the
council.
If
somebody
wants
to
go
sooner,
they
certainly
can
but
but
try
to
bring
as
many
sites
as
possible
council
at
one
time,
let's
figure
out
a
way
how
we
can
get
it
all
passed
up
or
down
and
move
forward.
L
Then,
on
this
issue
of
sustainability,
which
is
also
a
very
real
concern,
I
think
for
everyone,
particularly
in
the
housing
team,
because
they're
concerned
about
the
roughly
30
35
000
per
person
that
we're
spending
right
now
on
operating
expenses,
and
I
don't
believe
by
the
way
that
we
need
to
be
spending
that
much.
I
know
that
there
are
leaner
ways
that
we
can
manage
these
in
a
way
that
is
dignified
and
safe
and
provides
some
basic
services.
I
think
there
is
an
important
conversation.
L
We
really
need
to
force
about
sustainability
of
this
this
model
and
we
can
only
get
there
if
we
have
the
inventory
to
really
build.
I
think
what
we're
seeing
now
in
lotte,
for
example,
with
councilmember
peralta's
efforts.
We
are
ensuring
that
we
can
build
these
prefab
modular
quick,
build
apartments
in
a
way
that
complies
with
mandates
to
get
section
8
vouchers
that
will
hopefully
provide
some
sustainability
over
the
long
run.
L
There
are
interesting
models
from
houston
where
we
can
work
with
individuals
who
who
are
able
to
secure
jobs,
they're
working,
poor,
they're,
they're
unhoused,
but
they
they're
able
to
work,
and
perhaps
they
can
pay
very
minimal
amounts
of
rent
and
achieve
both
dignity
and
and
some
sustainability
in
the
model.
We
think
there
may
be
partnerships
with
churches
with
nonprofits
like
next
door
that
are
frankly,
going
to
be
able
to
access
dollars
anyway,
to
help
and-
and
we
can,
we
can
provide
housing
and
perhaps
collaborate
and
combine
resources.
L
So
I
think
there
are
options
here
to
make
this
more
sustainable
and
also
models
that
we're
working
on
now
with
a
goodwill
and
others
to
try
to
engage
the
residents
in
the
community
in
actually
providing
service
and
work
within
that
community
or
or
in
another
community,
for
example,
in
providing
security
and
maintenance
and
driving
shuttles.
For
other
community
members,
we
think
there
are
models
here
that
we
absolutely
should
and
must
explore
to
make
these
more
sustainable.
So
we're
not
simply
burning
one-time
money
on
very
expensive
management
operations.
L
So
so
we
are
hoping
that
by
leaning
in
in
this
way
dramatically
expanding
the
inventory,
we'll
finally
have
solutions.
So
we
won't
have
conversations
like
we
had
last
night,
where
we're
all
beating
our
heads
against
the
wall,
trying
to
figure
out
what
we
do
with
250
or
300
people
or
living
in
the
guadalupe
river
park,
and-
and
we
have
essentially
a
somewhat
sclerotic
process
for
deciding
how
we
can
get
people
housed
based
on
criteria.
We
know
are
handed
down
by
hud
that
force
us
to
go.
L
B
Thank
you
mayor.
Can
you
do
you
think
you
can
go
into
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
that?
I'm
sorry
all
right
going
to
bring
it
back
to
the
committee.
B
Does
anybody
have
anything
else
they
want?
To
add
on
to
that,
I
put.
I
Thanks
appreciate
it
and
and
welcome
back
to
the
rules
mayor,
I
I
don't
imagine
you
miss
out
on
on
losing
out
on
your
wednesdays
so
but
appreciate
you
coming
back
to
present
on
this
and
thanks
for
the
comprehensive
work
from
you
and
your
team
and
for
including
my
office
as
well.
I
No
surprise,
I
think
the
only
thing
slightly
more
comprehensive
that
I've
loved
would
love
to
add
to
them
to
the
list,
at
least
for
temporary
support
would
be
sanctioned
encampments.
But
I
think
these
are
all
efforts,
absolutely
that
we
need
to
ensure
that
we're
bulking
up
from
our
toolbox
and-
and
we
know
that
these
are
the
more
permanent
solutions
or
obviously
in
term,
but
but
in
turn,
for
some
time
that
helps
us
to
to
bridge
that
gap
to
permanently
ending
homelessness
for
thousands
of
individuals
in
our
city.
I
And
so
I
appreciate
that
that
work
and
the
comprehensiveness
again.
I
think
that
we,
we
have
an
opportunity,
as
you
have
pointed
out,
a
very
unique
one.
Given
the
resources
coming
in
from
the
federal
government,
the
state
giving
the
focus
as
well
from
our
governor,
and
I
think
we
we
heard
that
coming
from
him
just
before
the
pandemic.
I
Unfortunately
he's
now
been
able
to
reshift
that
focus
back
towards
addressing
affordable
housing
and
homelessness.
But
but
now
the
focus
is
well
from
our
president
and
this
opportunity
has
not
been
there
since,
since
I've
joined
the
council
and
likely
since
you've
been
on
the
council
to
have
this
much
focus,
energy
and
effort
and
then
ultimately,
resources
to
address
this
crisis,
and
I
think
we
absolutely
have
to
be
completely
prepared
and
prioritize
our
our
efforts
on
on
how
we
can
take
advantage
of
this
time.
M
Thank
you
vice
mayor,
I'm
also
supportive
of,
of
course,
housing.
Our
unhoused
community,
and
this
reminded
me
of
some
of
the
more
difficult
times
that
I've
seen
families
go
through
when
I
was
working
under
first
five
in
first
five
and
we
were
launching
a
specialty
drug
court
for
parents
who
had
their
children
removed
and
had
been
addicted
to
to
math
and-
and
you
know,
one
of
the
requirements
that
they
had
in
order
to
reunite
with
their
children
was,
of
course,
to
obtain
a
home.
M
And
in
order
to
obtain
a
home,
you
know
you
had
to
get
on
the
list.
And
then
you
have
to
comply
with
all
the
conditions
like
going
getting
a
job
or
going
through
a
training
program
or
going
to
school
and
going
to
drug
counseling
and
going
to
other
parenting
workshops
and
classes.
And
so
I
saw
one
too
many
times.
M
Parents
go
through
this
cycle
of.
If
they
couldn't
keep
up
with
some
of
these
things,
they
would
lose
their
their
housing
because
their
housing
was
basically
conditioned.
M
You
know
as
long
as
you're
doing
well
and
if
you
don't
test
dirty
and
if
you
don't-
and
if
you
do
all
of
these
other
things
you
get
to
keep
your
home,
you
get
to
keep.
You
know
the
roof
over
your
head,
so
that
one
day
you
can
reunite
with
your
children.
And
so
one
of
the
lessons
I
learned
there
is
that
this
is.
M
This
is
not
a
housing
first
approach
for
families,
which
is
what
we
and
I
know
our
housing
department
in
our
county
now
really
holds
at
the
center
in
the
way
that
they
approach
the
unhoused
community
and
and
one
of
the
the
and
the
reason
I
bring
this
up-
is
that
I'm
concerned
about
one
of
the
items,
and
it's
one
a
four-
and
this
is
talking
about
that
having
at
least
one
location
will
be
provided
for.
M
Unhouse
individuals
in
employment
or
training
programs
such
as
san
jose
bridge
and
the
conservation
corps,
and
at
least
one
location
shall
provide
a
home
for
women
and
children
who
have
been
in
gender-based
violence
with
appropriate
discretion
and
resolve
all
legal
and
regulatory
issues
to
enable
this.
M
While
I
am
absolutely,
as
you
all
know,
supportive
of
women
who
are
survivors
either
of
sexual
assault
or
gender-based
violence,
I
think
it's
also
conditioning
the
the
group
that
fits
within
san
jose
bridge
and
conservation
corps
and
from
what
I
understand.
This
is
not
something
that
is
in
line
with
home
key
and
their
requirements
to
follow
the
local
referral
process
and
the
local
refer
process
doesn't
isn't
dependent.
They
don't
condition.
M
L
Mr,
could
I
respond
just
briefly:
yes,
wait
yeah,
I
think
that's
an
excellent
point.
You
know
there's
something
of
a
declaration
of
independence
here.
If
we
do
have
flexible
hap
funding,
for
example,
it
means
we
have
some
control
over
our
own
inventory
and
that
enables
us
to
do
things
other
than
simply
build
housing
for
a
regional
system
that
may
move
people
in
from
other
cities
based
on
criteria.
L
We
have
no
control
over
if
we
really
want
to
focus
instead
on
ending
violence
or
ending
any
cycle
of
violence
or
ending
homelessness
among
families,
for
example,
the
ability
to
be
able
to
target
is
really
important
and
we've
lacked
that
ability.
You
know
we
we
are.
We
should
be
rightfully
proud
of
the
incredible
work
we've
done
in
partnership
with
the
county
and
many
nonprofits
and
the
housing
authority
and
getting
4
900
people
housed
permanently
since
the
start
of
the
pandemic.
L
But
we
can't
get
250
people
housed
when
the
federal
government
is
ordering
us
to
to
clear
out
the
airport
approach
area
and
that
points
to
the
fact
that
we
have
literally
no
control
over
this
inventory
of
housing
in
terms
of
who
actually
gets
housed-
and
you
know
I
think,
we've
all
had
that
experience
of
being
in
the
in
the
centers
that
we
work
so
hard
to
build
and
welcoming
greeting
people
who
are
coming
to
us.
Who've
been
living
in
other
cities,
their
entire
lives
and-
and
we
say
well
gosh,
but
wait
a
minute.
L
There's
this
encampment,
where
a
lot
of
san
jose
residents
live
just
a
block
away.
So
I
I
think
many
of
us
would
like
to
be
able
to
have
this
ability
to
have
a
local
preference.
We
understand
that
not
every
dollar
is
going
to
be
open
to
that
home.
Key
may
not
be,
but
hap
can
be,
and
so
we
just
need
to
be
creative,
and
I
think
we
have
this
opportunity
now.
M
Yeah
there's
a
distinction
there.
I
I'm
not
talking
about
local
requirements,
I'm
talking
about
a
requirement
of
employment
or
training
program.
So
I
don't
know
if,
if
there's
anybody
else
on
the
call
that
can
can
speak
to
this,
because
I
responded.
M
No,
I
understand
that
there's
there's
going
to
be
a
myriad
of
funds.
It's
not
going
to
be
just
home
key,
and
I
understand
that.
But
one
of
the
principles
of
housing.
First
in
our
approach
here
in
in
the
city
and
in
the
county,
is
to
to
respond
to
the
most
vulnerable,
the
ones
that
are
at
the
the
in
the
streets.
M
They
have
been
living
in
the
streets
for
a
certain
length
of
time
that
either
have
medical
conditions,
or
maybe
some
mental
health
issues
that
or
our
seniors
there's
a
lot
of
folks
who
end
up
dying
in
our
streets
that
could
benefit
from
a
home
and
I'm
afraid
that
we're
putting
some
programs
that
I
well.
I
agree
with
these
programs
and
there's
nothing
that
I
would
ever
oppose
in
terms
of
san
jose
bridge
and
conservation
corps.
M
I
think
they're
worthy
programs
and
programs
that
provided
an
alternative
path
for
a
lot
of
you
that
they're
we're
we're
putting
one
group
above
the
other,
and
so
I
I
just
would
like
for
us
to
make
sure
that
we
continue
to
adhere
to
a
housing
first
and
to
the
most
vulnerable
of
populations.
L
All
right,
mr
church,
I
respond
briefly,
yes,
great
yeah.
I
I
certainly
agree
that
we
should
continue
to
adhere
to
a
housing
first
approach.
L
L
L
I
think
the
idea
of
being
able
to
ensure
that
those
who
are
rolling
up
their
sleeves
serving
our
community
and
trying
to
find
a
pathway
to
self-sufficiency
could
be
directly
assisted
if
we
can
get
them
housed
too,
and
I
I
just
you
know
if
we
got
people
working
for
six
months
at
conservation
corps
and
they're
still
in-house,
why
would
anyone
else
ever
want
to
work
for
the
conservation
corps?
I
mean
we
just.
We
need
to
treat
people
better
than
that.
M
Oh,
no,
absolutely,
and
I
I
completely
agree
with
you.
I
think
that
if
they're
in
that
population,
where
they're,
former
or
transitioning
foster
care
youth,
that
really
puts
them
in
a
vulnerable
position
and
not
to
minimize
anybody
else's.
M
Challenges
that
are
not
in
the
that
weren't
in
the
system,
but
as
you
know
that
that
we
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
most
vulnerable
are
in
first
first
in
line,
if
you
will
in
terms
of
any
of
these
programs
and
so
well,
I
I
don't
disagree
with
you
at
all
mayor.
I
think
that
providing
a
a
housing
solution
for
our
youth
and
and
those
participants
in
in
those
training
and
employment
programs
is
something
that
I
absolutely
support.
M
I
not
in
you
know,
I'm
not
opposing
that
at
all.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
our
that
we're,
following
our
our
commitments
to
the
most
vulnerable
and
at
this
point,
the
most
vulnerable,
would
be
those
folks
who
are
who
are
out
there
in
in
the
streets
just
like
the
san
jose
bridge
and
conservation
corps.
But
we
don't
have
to
make
that
condition
if
they
are
in
an
employment
or
training
program,
because
I
think
that
doesn't
go
well
with
the
principles
that
we
that
we're
committed
to.
M
I
think
if
they
happen
to
be
in
the
san
jose
bridge
and
conservation
corps
and
then
they're
also
living
on
the
streets
and-
and
you
know-
or
they
have
you
know
young
children
and
they're
living
in
the
in
their
car
they're
in
safe
parking.
I
think
that
that
qualifies
them
to
to
come
into
and
maybe
benefit
from
this,
but
not
the
other
way
around.
M
They
don't
have
to
be
in
an
employment
or
training
program
in
order
to
qualify
and
that's
I
know
it's
nuanced,
but
but
I
I
think,
there's
a
it's
a
it's
a
nuanced
approach
that
we
we
could
be
moving
in
in
the
direction
where
we're
qualifying
folks,
in
the
same
way
that
I
was
talking
about
my
experience
in
drug
court
and
a
lot
of
the
failure
of
reunification
and
loss
of
parental
rights
had
a
lot
to
do
with
a
lot
of
these
parents
having
to
comply
with
and
being
conditioned
to
do
all
sorts
of
things.
M
And
I
know
that
this
is
not
what
we're
doing
here,
we're
not
conditioning
our
unhoused
community
to
any
to
any
of
these
things.
So
I
think,
if
we
just
change
the
way
that
or
maybe
modify
the
way,
that
we
are
going
to
approach
this
and
and
and
if
the
san
jose
bridge
and
conservation
core
participants,
if
we
overlay
this
this
criteria
of
being
in-house
and
they
and
they
happen
to
qualify
that
is
great
but
not
based
on
on
employment
or
training.
So
I'll
I'll
leave
that
piece
alone.
I
think.
L
Yeah,
I
guess
councillor,
I
think
I
think
I
understand
your
point.
I
would
just
ask
if
you
could
suspend
disbelief
for
just
a
few
weeks
to
allow
staff
to
chew
on
this
sure
we
could
have
a
broader
conversation.
L
I
I
understand,
I
think
I
understand
the
concern
and,
and
I'm
happy
I
I
I
understand,
we
don't
want
to
condition
housing
for
people.
L
For
people
based
on
whether
they
you
know
have
to
jump
over
particular
hoops
that
we
create,
there
may
be
very
unique
circumstances
where
I
think
we
might
all
agree
that
being
able
to
have
the
housing
for
those
who
are
unhoused,
who
are
actually
part
of
a
program.
That's
helping
them
get
on
their
feet
that
will
enable
them
to
transition
through
that
housing.
Something
more
permanent
is
actually
a
way
we're
going
to
get
more
people
housed
faster.
M
Absolutely
agree,
and
so
I'll
give
that
as
feedback
and
the
the
other
piece
is
oh
gosh.
Where
does
this
fall
under
one
a
a.
M
M
So
if
you
work,
if
you
live
here,
you
have
to
work
here,
you
have
to
earn
your
keep
in
other
words,
and
so
I
just
cautioned
it
on
a
on
an
approach
that
that
incorporates
that
into
our
system
and
and
they
and
the
other
piece
is
oh,
my
gosh,
it's
one
a
h,
and
that
is
enhanced
services,
programs
for
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
who
host
eih
season
bhc's,
and
I
completely
agree.
M
But
before
that
happens
before
we
move
forward,
we
need
to
make
sure
that
the
other
sites
are
also
receiving
enhanced
services.
And
so
that's
the
question
I
have
are:
they
all
are
the
other
sites
that
we
have
for
eihc
and
bhcs.
Do
they
already
receive
enhanced
services.
J
B
J
Council
member,
I
would
just
say
from
the
perspective
of
the
council
office,
especially
in
district
2,
where
we
have
two
of
these
bridge
housing
locations.
I
think
that
that
what
what
you
see
there
in
the
memo
was
incorporated,
it
was
an
incorporated
piece
from
the
memo
I
had
written
back
in
the
day
when
the
original
bridge
housing
in
district
2
got
put
into
this
for
two.
J
I
can
tell
you
from
the
view
of
the
residence
and
the
view
of
my
office.
I
don't
think
we've
necessarily
had
enhanced
services
and
that's
why
I
thought
it
was
important
to
lift
that
up
and
plug
that
into
the
memo
to
be
very
explicit
about
that,
and
that
can
mean
extra
police
patrols.
You
know
litter
abatement,
things
of
that
nature,
and
so
I'm.
D
M
Right,
yes,
I
think
that
that
would
be
an
absolute
requirement
before
we
continue
to
move
on
to
other
sites
that
we
look
at
the
ones
that
we've
already
done.
M
So
I
completely
agree
with
you,
council,
member
and
then
lastly,
on
on
the
council
policy,
prior
prioritization
early
consideration
response
form
on
page
three
under
one
e
through
j,
it
is
green,
lit
and
it
says
home
key
and
have
currently
required
that
tenant
selection
be
conducted
through
the
coordinated
entry
system
as
a
condition
of
accepting
funds,
which
is
what
I
was
talking
about.
N
So
this
is
jackie
morales
fran,
I'm
the
director
of
housing,
so
I
can
see
under
home
key
application
number
one.
They
did
not
have
a
specific
tenant
selection
criteria
that
they
added
to
home
key
two,
so
it
appears
that
they
did
at
one
point:
allow
didn't
have
the
specific
requirement
to
have
tenant
selection
done
through
the
coordinated
entry
system
or
aligned
with
that
and
my
understanding
is
that
mountain
view,
in
fact
selected
everyone
from
a
mountain
view
to
live
in
their
site.
N
N
What
there
would
not
be
an
opportunity
to
change
either
in
homekey
or
hap
is
this
housing
first
criteria
that
you
talked
about
a
little
bit
earlier
in
terms
of
conditioning
people
to
participate
in
programs
as
a
means
to
keep
their
housing
is
not
allowed,
so
you
could
have
somebody
enter
in
a
housing
program
that
was
part
of
a
work
program
in
one
of
these
sites,
but
if
they
dropped
out
of
the
work
program,
we
couldn't
just
say
sorry:
you're
gonna
lose
your
housing.
N
Those
are
two
different
issues,
but
I
did
want
to
clarify
that
right.
M
Right
one
is
qualifying
them
because
they
are
in
an
employment
or
training
and
then
and
then
disqualifying
them
because
they're
not
right
or
removing
them
from
the
service
right.
No,
I
I
completely
get
that
I'm
still
not
exactly
clear
on
on
the
policy
change,
but
you
know
jackie.
I
trust
that
you
know
you
know
you
notice.
M
I
like
I've,
said
before
I
dabble
in
this.
You
are
absolutely
knee-deep
in
these
policies
and
what
they,
what
we
need
in
terms
of
response
and
and
how
to
change
these.
These
rules
for
the
betterment
of
our
family.
So
I
am
I'm
just
gonna.
Leave
that
that
piece
alone,
the
the
last
piece
that
I
that
I
wanted
to
talk
about
was
there's
mention
of
folks
of
certain
agencies.
M
In
this
memo,
I
think
one
of
them
was
sandhill.
The
other
one
was
comcast
and
I
I
would
I
would
really
prefer
if
we
said
limited
not
limited
to.
I
know
that
says
partners
such
as
sandhill
properties,
but
I
think
we
could
either
include
but
not
limited
to
or
just
not
mention
those
particular
agencies.
M
It's
it
appears
as
exclusivity
and-
and
I
wouldn't
want
us
to
have
that
people
to
assume
that
we
have
this
exclusivity
with
these
folks.
I
know
that
they've
been
doing
some
really
good,
a
really
good
work
and
and
and
mayor
heard
loud
and
clear,
15
million.
I
mean
you
know
that
that
is
a
significant
amount
of
money
to
re
and
bringing
all
your
the
resources
together.
M
So
so,
thank
you
so
much
for
for
your
leadership
in
in
doing
that,
and-
and
I
know
that
our
our
department
leadership
also
has
it's
very
good
contacts
and
has
been
working
on
with
some
of
these
agencies
and
companies,
but
I'd
like
for
us
to
leave
out
certain
names
so
that
we
can
really
explore
our
options
and
not
limit
ourselves
to
one
particular
agency.
M
That's
built
into
a
a
mmo,
and
so
I
know
I
keep
saying
this
is
the
last
thing,
but
I
continue
to
find
things
on
my
on
my
notes.
So
I'll
end
with
you
just
really
thanking
the
group
of
folks
who
who've
come
together.
M
Mayor
and
and
and
the
rest
of
my
colleagues
who
signed
on
to
this
memo,
I
think,
is
really
comprehensive
and-
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we,
that
are
our
short-term
and
interim
sites,
lead
to
permanent
solutions
for
our
families.
I
know
that
you
all
agree.
M
I
would
really
caution
us
to
look
at
how
we're
choosing
the
sites
that
are
going
to
go
into
any
of
these
six
districts,
including
my
district,
and
that
it's
not
in
an
attempt
to
quelch
some
of
the
concerns
of
of
of
our
most
vocal
of
residents,
but
that
it
really
responds
to
the
most
vulnerable
of
of
the
unhoused
community,
because
they
there
is
some
great
distinctions
between
them.
M
Amongst
them
I
mean
so
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that
continues
to
to
be
the
way
that
we
make
decisions
and
and
that
we
have
steps
in
in
between
to
to
find
permanent
housing.
M
And
I
know
that
there's
a
really
great,
family-oriented
campaign
that
will
be
happening
on
the
on
the
county
side,
which
I
I'm
just
you
know
over
the
moon
about,
because
it's
it's
really
much
needed
and,
as
you
all
know,
that
our
families
have
been
just
leaving
our
our
city
of
san
jose
going
to
central
valleys
and
other
parts
that
are
of
california
that
are
more
affordable.
M
So
I
just
want
to
to
have
that
as
the
last
thought,
and-
and
thank
you
once
thank
you
all
once
again
for
for
this
proposal.
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
councilmember,
calling.
F
Yes,
thank
you
just
I'll
be
brief,
but
I
want
to
thank
you
first
of
all,
mayor
and
the
rest
of
the
folks
on
the
memo
for
this
bring
this
forward.
It's
important
to
have
a
comprehensive
approach.
F
There's
a
lot
of
good
detail
in
this
memo
could
be
there's
going
to
be
a
need
for
for
all
of
these
different
approaches
for
for
people
with
different
types
of
needs,
and
so
it's
important
to
have
a
variety
of
approaches
that
you've
brought
forward
here
and
a
lot
of
different
elements
that
you
have
in
in
this.
F
I
just
wanted
to
ask
about
one
piece:
I
know
that
there's
the
there's
the
safe
heart
parking
piece
that
councilmember
jimenez
has
in
his
district
and
in
here
I
know
that
there's
probably
a
greater
need
for
that
across
the
city.
Besides,
what
is
in
this
one
element,
and
so
I'm
I'm
just
curious
as
to
whether
we've
you
know
what
we
think
about
expanding
that
beyond
this
one
site
as
part
of
this
or
whether
we
think
that's
a
separate
effort
in
the
future
beyond.
F
What's
in
this
particular
memo,
because
I
think
we
have
I-
I
guess
I
don't
know
the
scope
of
what
the
proposal
is
in
d2.
Maybe
councilman
is
you
want
to
address
that
a
little
bit
so
that
you
get
an
idea.
J
Yeah
yeah
very
good
question
yeah.
I
I'm
with
you
that
I
recognize
that,
no
matter
how
we
build
it
out
at
the
future
police
training
facility,
it's
not
going
to
be
enough.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
right
after
this
meeting
I
have
a
call
with
jim
ortball
to
start
getting
the
ball
rolling
and
start
thinking
through
how
to
move
these
things
forward.
J
I
can
tell
you
that
my
office,
along
with
the
housing
department,
has
been
in
discussions
with
vta
on
a
large,
mostly
vacant
parking
lot
at
the
at
the
santa
teresa
light
rail
station
to
figure
out
if
we
can
utilize
that
as
a
safe
parking
for
rvs.
But
I
also
have
to
be
very
honest
with
you
is
that
district
two
specifically,
that
area
already
has
a
big
problem
with
many
rvs
parking
along
the
roadways,
just
like
district
4,
and
I
suspect
you
know-
district
3,
for
example.
J
We
were
talking
about
yesterday,
and
so
you
know
I'm
trying
to
do
whatever
I
can
to
move
that
forward.
But,
to
be
very
frank
and
honest,
I
mean
I,
I
very
much
prefer
to
have
district
2
rvs
that
are
right
around
the
corner
from
that
site
park
at
that
location,
and
that's
why
yesterday,
when
I
was,
we
were
having
the
discussion
I
expressed
that
I
thought
it
was
important
that
we
all
look
for
sites
in
our
district
right,
and
so
I
am
looking
for
an
additional
site.
J
F
City
need
in
your
district.
I
guess
my
question
was
more
one
to
suggest
that
this
the
memo
was
was
addressing
one
specific
site
which
would
potentially
address
district
two's
needs,
but
we
know
that
I
think
every
district
in
the
city
has
rvs
scattered
throughout
in
neighborhoods
and
across
the
city,
and
and
this
is
an
additional
need.
I
think
that
we
we
haven't
really
focused
on
yet
as
a
city
for
a
comprehensive
solution,
and
so
I'm
just
wondering
yeah.
You
know
what,
if
there's
been
thought
about,
how
we
might.
F
Not
part
of
this
this
so
this
particular.
J
Yeah
yeah,
you
know,
but
but
but
just
another
thing
that
there
is
jackie.
I'm
sure
jackie
could
speak
to
this,
but
I
think
the
rfp
is
going
to
be
re-released
as
it
relates
to
rv,
safe
parking
and
so
I'd
be
curious
to
hear
from
jackie,
as
I'm
sure
you
would
as
to
whether
she
thinks
whoever
steps
up
can
handle
more
than
one
site
right,
and
I
think
that
would
probably
open
up
the
door
to
other
possibilities
that
just
don't
exist
at
the
moment.
N
An
rvs
require
additional
work
and
additional
services
because
of
the
nature
of
having
to
dispose
of
their
waste.
We
did
not
have
any
non-profits
responding
that
they
wanted
to
actually
provide
oversight
of
an
rv
park.
We
are,
as
a
result,
we
did
meet
with
non-profits
to
re-engage
them
to
understand
what
was
making
them.
Hesitant
we're
going
to
address
those
concerns
in
the
next
rfp
that
we're
going
to
release
and
hope
that
we
will
get
more
than
one
respondent.
N
In
our
work
plan
we
were
hoping
to
open
at
least
two
rv
or
car
parking
safe
parking
spots
in
the
city,
great
okay,.
F
F
B
G
I
Yeah,
thank
you
just
wanted
to
speak
to
the
issue
of
prioritizing
individuals
within
a
geographic
area.
Specifically
when
you
talk
about
some
of
these
solutions,
as
councilmember
jimenez
was
saying,
you
know,
he'd
love
to
be
able
to
if
there
was
a
solution
created
in
a
particular
area,
he'd
love
to
be
able
to
utilize
that
to
relocate,
for
instance,
rvs
from
his
own
area,
and
that
actually
speaks
to
the
concern
or
the
question
that
councilmember
dennis
had
on.
I
Potentially
some
policy
changes
or
advocacy,
and
this
is
an
area
that
I've
been
interested
in
for
a
number
of
years,
as
we've
housed
a
number
or
created
a
number
of
these
permanent
supportive
housing
units
and
other
opportunities
and
the
ones
that
have
come
with
outside
requirements.
If
you
will
because,
for
instance,
measure
a
dollars
funded
through
the
county
or
or
solutions
funded
through
state
dollars
or
federal
dollars.
I
Coming
with
the
requirement
that
we
can't
exclude
someone
from
outside
of
the
area,
whether
it's
outside
of
the
city
of
san
jose
somewhere
else
within
the
county
and
that
at
the
end
of
the
day,
has
been
one
of
the
last
sort
of
straws
that
community
members
that
I've
engaged
with
have
been
frustrated
about,
for
instance,
a
neighborhood
that
you
know
maybe
was
reluctant
at
first
to
have
a
permanent,
supportive
housing
development
in
their
community.
I
But
then,
at
the
kind
of
the
the
last
I
guess
hurdle
is
they
become
frustrated
when
they
find
out
that
we
can't
prioritize
and
not
even
necessarily
mandate
or
guarantee.
But
just
we
can't
even
prioritize
getting
individuals
that
may
be
homeless
that
are
in
their
immediate
community
or
even
their
surrounding
community,
and
that
we
could
end
up
with
people
from
mountain
view
or
gilroy
or
outside
the
area.
And
so
that's
where
I
think
that
that
advocacy
could
be
beneficial
to
see.
I
If
we
can
have
some
some
changes
there
to
to
open
up
a
little
flexibility
as
jackie
was
stating
the
example
was
mountain
view
right
with
some
of
these
initial
dollars,
because
that
stipulation
wasn't
there
on
on
the
the
geographic
sort
of
location
of
individuals.
I
Mountain
view
simply
just
said
great
we're
going
to
house
individuals
within
our
community,
and
I
think
you
know
that's
a
lot
of
what
these
neighborhoods
would
love
to
see
is
hey.
Look
if
we're
going
to
take
on
solutions
like
this.
Could
we
at
least
know
that
it's
going
to
be
benefiting,
or
at
least
prioritize
a
benefit
to
the
unhoused
neighbors
that
already
live
in
their
community?
So
I
I
I
look
forward
to
that.
Hopefully
coming
forward.
That
is,
is
an
interest.
I
Mine
been
an
interest
of
mine,
and
I
recognize
that
when
we
have
local
dollars
that
that
those
parameters
are
not
a
requirement,
we
we
can
do
this
already,
but
for
other
dollars
that
were
taken
advantage
of
coming
from
the
county
of
the
state.
We
then
need
to
advocate,
for
maybe
some
change.
That's
that
advocacy
that
we'd
like
to
see
thanks.
B
Thank
you
mayor.
L
Thank
you
say
just
in
response
to
councilmember
cohen's
excellent
point
about
parking
for
rv
vehicles.
I
I
I
didn't
have
any
brilliant
ideas
when
councilmember
jimenez
mentioned
well,
we're
working
on
a
site
said
great,
let's
throw
it
in
there,
but
I
think
you
know
we'd
welcome
you
know.
Maybe
this
is
the
opportunity
for
having
another
discussion
about
how
we
can
engage
in
sighting
in
a
different
way
for
for,
for
that
particular
need
as
well.
I'd
welcome
that
and
obviously
we'll
be
able
to
entertain
council
members
when,
whenever
this
comes
to
council.
B
B
A
Sure
vice
mayor,
thank
you,
as
outlined
in
the
early
consideration
form.
The
administration
has
greenlit
all
of
the
items
here,
as
it
is
a
workload
assessment
and
cost
analysis
we'll
be
bringing
this
forward.
As
for
consideration
and
council
discussion
on
november,
2nd
just
like
the
previous
item
and
staff
is
here
for
any
questions,
the
rules
committee
might
have.
B
Great,
thank
you
lee
and
the
mayor
is
still
with
us,
so
I'm
also
going
to
make
a
wild
guess
that
he's
going
to
want
to
speak
to
this
item
as
well,
and
I'm
anticipating
he's
going
to
go
into
a
lot
of
detail.
So
no
I'm
not.
B
Awesome
outstanding
presentation
mayor.
Thank
you
all
right,
so
I'm
gonna
go
to
the
public
first
and
tessa.
C
Okay,
thank
you
clean
san
jose.
Yes,
I've
been
hearing
about
that
and
that
mayor
lucardo
wants
to
pay
people
25
an
hour
to
clean,
and
I
think
that's
good,
and
you
know
the
other
program
that
you
know
sylvia
arenas
was
talking
about
is
like.
Do
we
take
away
housing
if
they're
not
working,
so
these
are
the
these
are
the
like
critical
issues
that
we're
looking
at
is
like?
How
do
you
keep
people
working
and
being
productive
in
our
society?
C
But
the
thing
is:
is
that
the
issue
of
you
know
participating
in
capitalism,
and
consumerism
is
what
we
really
need
to
get
away
from.
So
when
we're
giving
people
just
money,
you
know
and
that's
like
as
we
go
forward
in
terms
of
our
climate
crisis
and
we're
supposed
to
stay
at
1.5
degrees.
That
means
we're
reducing
our
economic
growth.
C
We
have
to
reduce
our
economic
growth
so
to
say
that
we're
going
to
give
people
jobs
and
then
they're
going
to
get
into
housing
and
they're
going
to
be
part
of
the
american
dream
of
of
this
cycle.
This
is
a
myth,
because
all
of
our
money
actually
is
because
it's
based
on
fossil
fuel
production,
that's
how
we
become
an
industrialized
civilization.
C
So
really,
I
think
the
key
to
all
this
is
that
if
we
are
going
to
stay
below
1.5,
so
we
don't
have
the
storms
and
and
horrific
storms
that
they're
saying
is
going
to
be
40
times
worse
for
the
next
generation.
I
don't
know
if
it's
40,
but
it's
it's
bad
for
the
next
generation.
Everything
we're
doing
is
going
to
be
affecting
that.
So
we
need
to
stop
the
the
proposed
the
production
of
fossil
fuels
and
even
this
economic
growth.
C
So
what
it
needs
to
be,
I
think,
is
universal
basic
income
because
there
will
not
be
jobs
and
there
will
be
work.
We
need
to
get
people
to
work
and
it's
based
on,
like
the
salvation
army's
philosophy
of
you
know,
and
the
christian
philosophy
of
you
know
idol
hands
or
the
devil's
workshop.
But
we
need
to
get
people
working
in
solving
our
problems,
which
is
not
only
clean,
but
it's
also
growing
food
and
and
and
and
producing
food
and
preparing
food
and
preserving
food.
So
we
stop
waste,
stop
blast.
G
I'm
a
big
believer
in
cleaning
I
I'd
like
to.
I
don't
know:
maybe
people
could
dream
with
me.
I
just
wish
that
zero
point
energy
stuff
was
actually
real
in
a
little
cube.
You
know
what
I
mean
something,
but
it's
gonna
be
up
to
us
because
I
don't
think
we're
gonna
get
visitors
from
wherever
and
hopefully,
if
we
do,
they
won't
be
like
us
in
some
ways,
anyways
a
little
far
afield.
I
know,
but
I
think
you
get
what
I'm
trying
to
say.
G
We
we
just
need
a
clean
place
to
live,
and
I
probably
won't
be
here
that
much
longer
got
about
another
eight
months
in
the
state
and
then
east
coast
is
going
to
have
to
listen
to
me
talk,
but
I'm
really
really
hopeful
that
san
jose
does
get
this
together,
because
it
is
a
beautiful
city
deep
down-
and
I
thank
all
of
you
for
that.
But
thank
you.
Feismer.
D
Hi,
thank
you
boybeekman
here.
Thank
you
for
this
item
and
this
project
I'd
be
interested
in
it
myself.
You
know
for
as
good
as
this
project
can
be.
I
think
we
have
to
be
just
a
bit
wary
about
introducing
it.
As
you
know,
the
the
one
I'll
be
all
fix
it.
Plan
of
things
working
with
garbage
is
kind
of
dirty
work
and
there's
a
lot
of
issues
with
collecting
garbage
that
I
think,
day
after
day
week
after
week,
it
can
get
a
bit
tiring
and.
D
I
don't
know
unhealthy,
so
I
mean,
while
this
is,
it
is
of
help,
and
it
is,
it
seems
like
it
can
do
some
good
things
we
just
have
to.
I
guess
know
how
to
talk
about
it,
and
so
thanks
for
letting
me
talk
about
it
here
and
I
I
wanted
to
quickly
mention
that,
with
the
home
key
ideas,
you
know
how
much
I've
been
talking
about
the
subsidy
plans
coming
coming
down
from
the
state
and
federal
level
to
help
with
transitional
housing.
D
I
think
those
subsidy
plans
can
really
help
with
home
key
issues.
I
can't
remember
her
name
at
the
moment,
but
a
person
who
speaks
regularly
on
homeless
issues
she
spoke
about.
You
know
the
need
that
create
housing
for
people
living
in
their
district
area
is
an
important
concept.
D
I
hope
that
can
be
worked
on
with
this
new
subsidy
funding
and
it
can
really
it
can
really
be
of
help
with
the
transitional
process
and
how
possibly
to
help
with
with
turnover
issues
and
get
people
from
from
home
key
to
to
permanent
housing.
I
mean
there's
real
permanent
housing
ideas
that
are
possible
at
this
time
that
you
know
from
transitional
practices
that
have
been
stymied
for
years.
Good
luck,
how
he
can
work
on
these
issues.
Thank
you.
J
Yes,
I'm
for
this
project
completely.
My
grandfather,
a
very
wise
person,
said
that
if
a
person
doesn't
have
a
pair
of
boots-
and
you
give
them
one
if
they
don't
reach
down
and
pull
on
the
boots,
then
you're
not
going
to
solve
the
problem
and
one
of
the
things
I
found
talking
to
the
people
in
the
columbus
park
area
and
up
and
down
the
river
is
a
lot
of
them.
J
Don't
have
work
many
of
them
and
I
could
give
you
the
names
that
say
they
would
love
to
have
a
project
I'm
a
little
jealous,
I
retired,
as
a
paramedic,
only
earning
25
an
hour.
So
I
guess
I
should
have
went
to
work
for
sam.
So
I
think
that
we
need
to
have
some
pride
in
our
lives
and
having
a
job
is
one
of
those
things
that
can
make
us
proud,
proud,
councilman,
perales.
J
A
lot
of
the
folks
there
to
your
comment
are
not
only
from
not
san
jose
but
are
actually
from
other
states.
So
just
a
comment:
you
can
do
with
it.
What
you
want
and
mayor
the
I
worked
with
the
conservation
corps
recently
on
two
projects,
just
trying
to
help
out
the
city
and
myself
and
feelings,
and
I
found
that
up
to
at
one
time
up
to
15
of
them
didn't
lived
in
their
car
or
didn't
have
housing.
J
B
M
I
know
for
for
our
district
there's
some
areas
that
have
been
really
impacted
with
accumulation
of
blight
and
whatnot
around,
just
like
in
everywhere
else
in
in
san
jose,
and
so
I
think
a
targeted
strategy
like
this
is
is,
is
great
one
of
the
things
that
I
that
I'm
concerned
about,
though,
is
it's
under
recommendation
1c
and
that
it
prioritizes
high-need
neighborhoods,
with
a
focus
on
blighted
streets
and
other
public
more
frequent
spaces
more
frequently
and
visibly
encountered
by
our
residents
and
we've
seen
before
how
more
fluent
and
well-resourced
neighborhoods
are
the
ones
who
are
calling
in
or
plugging
their
complaints
into
san
jose,
311
or
formerly
the
my
san
jose
app.
M
But
it
perpetually
leaves
out
those
folks
who
are
not
as
savvy
or
just
don't
have
the
time
or
resources.
And
so
I
want
to
make
sure
that
this
is
not
going
to
be
motivated
by
the
the
the
frequency
of
calls
and
and
concerns.
But
it's
it's
going
to
be
determined
by
the
actual
need,
and
I
think
it
was.
M
I
can't
remember
what
the
system
was
called,
but
I
know
that
zara
sarotti
and
jim
ortfall
were
had
been
working
on
on
a
system
that
qualified,
if
you
will,
the
level
of
impact
that
that
neighborhoods
had.
And
so
I
I'm
wondering
if
somebody
could
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
how
this
will
be
determined.
And
how
can
we
make
sure
that
this
is
equitable,
especially
for
those
neighborhoods
that
are
not
going
to
produce
those
kinds
of
concerns
through
the
systems
that
we
currently
have.
O
Good
afternoon
this
is
neil
rafino,
I'm
the
assistant
director
for
parks,
recreation,
labor
services,
and
I
can
take
a
bit
of
that
question
council
member
renis,
the
process
that
you
talked
about
with
jim
and
sarah.
O
That
was
all
part
of
the
development
of
beautify
sj's
effort
over
this
past
year
with
through
the
eoc,
and
you
know
that
effort
of
us
looking
at
equity
as
a
as
a
core,
is
really
what
we're
going
to
continue
to
maintain
throughout
the
organization
for
beautify
services
that
have
been
carried
forward
through
the
park
rec
department.
A
lot
of
the
work
you
know
will
be
done
through
ground
truthing.
O
This
effort,
through
our
own
staff
right
we're
gonna,
have
a
lot
of
staff
and
partners
in
this
who
see
where
these
hot
spots
are
right.
We're
gonna
be
overlaying
it
with
the
mapping
of
need,
you
know
across
the
city,
and
we
do
utilize
a
tool
such
as
sj311
as
one
parameter,
but
we
definitely
know
in
the
work
of
sj311.
O
That
is
not
the
the
whole
answer
in
terms
of
services,
so
our
intent
is
really
to
prioritize
where
services
can
be
done.
As
we
all
know
here,
the
resources
are
still
going
to
be
limited.
There's
a
lot
of
work
to
do,
and
we
need
to
really
be
focused
on
making
sure
that
the
highest
impacted
communities
are
are
maintaining
and
are
being
serviced.
M
Great,
thank
you
so
much
neil.
I
love
to
learn
a
little
bit
offline
in
terms
of
what
is
overlaid
on
that
with
that
on
that
map,
and
we
can
talk
offline
on
about
that.
M
The
the
other
thing
that
I
was
concerned
about-
and
I
know
that
you
just
addressed
this-
a
portion
of
my
comment
by
assuring
me
that
there's
a
variety
of
sources
of
information
to
collect
and
determine
what
those
high
needs
are
or
where
those
high
needs
are,
but
you
know
but
recommendation
to
a
this.
M
Has
the
this
has
the
the
potential
of
of
of
a
bounty
or
reward
system
that
could
target
people
of
color
for
illegal
dumping
and
and
would
provide
more
of
the
affluent
residents
you
know
who
are
typically,
like
I
mentioned,
are
the
ones
who
report
with
another
tool
to
to
report
citizens
of
color
or
residents
of
color.
Excuse
me,
so
you
know
I
just
want
us.
I
want
to
caution
us
in
in
this
approach
and
I'm
not
sure
if
this.
This
is
something
that
you've
already
thought
through.
O
You
know
I
just
say
you
know:
part
of
this
is
you
know,
part
of
our.
Our
system
is
going
to
be
to
take
a
look
at
the
actual
data
right
and
we
don't
have
that
yet
you
know
in
terms
of
a
new
system
where
this,
where
this
would
be
rolled
out.
You
know
and
part
of
our
work
towards
centering
equity
and
all
of
our
decisions
is
to
understand
what
the
data
tells
us.
You
know,
and
if
there
are
situations
where
you
know,
race
is
a
factor
on
here.
O
O
I
think
we
need
to
put
as
many
tools
as
we
can
to
stop
illegal
dumping,
and
you
know
take
a
look
at
at
what
the
results
are
and
who
is
harmed
and
who
is
hurt
right
as
her
basic
tenant
about
working
with
equity.
M
Lastly,
you
know
I
just
want
to
I.
I
really
appreciate
the
the
trash
for
cash
or
cash
for
trash
program,
and
I
know
it's
mostly
focused
in
the
downtown
area
and
some
of
my
residents
have
been
working
around
the
thompson
creek,
which
has
also
become
a
source
site.
M
They
advocate
quite
a
bit
for
our
our
unhoused
community.
There
they
out
of
their
own
pocket,
feed
our
community
unhoused
community,
and
so
I'm
hoping
that
we
could
also
have
some
of
the
source
sites
be
included
into
the
the
san
jose
bridge
program
or
have
them
incorporated.
Is
there
any
plans
to
do
that
to
have
a
little
bit
more
focus
outside
of
downtown
areas.
O
I
could
start,
I
guess
the
the
answer
on
that
one
and
the
bridge
program
overall
will
be
managed
by
the
housing
department,
and
you
know
as
we
design
it.
You
know
housing
in
the
lead
with
trns
and
and
beautify
us
as
partners.
In
there
I
mean
we've
laid
a
lot
of
groundwork
with
the
source
sites
already,
and
I
really
don't
think
that
there
would
be
any
reason
why
we
wouldn't
utilize
source
sites
as
one
of
the
base
communities
of
service
jackie.
If
you
wanted
to
add
anything
on
that.
M
Perfect,
that's
my
kiddo
in
the
background
all
right.
Well,
I
really
appreciate
that.
Thank
you,
jackie
for
that
consideration
and
neil
for
your
responses,
I'll
be
supporting
the
motion
on
the
floor.
B
A
transportation
and
environment
committee
update
to
the
august
2021
june
2022.
A
B
H
You
go
to
the
public.
Can
I
just
comment
that
we're
just
dropping
the
climate,
smart
semi-annual
report,
because
we're
having
the
study
session
on
climate
smart
in
november?
So
that's
why
it's
being
that's
why
that
is
happening.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
before
any
members
of
the
public
comment
that
we're
dropping
a
very
important
item
that
we
are
not
in
fact
dropping
it.
We've
it's
going
to
us
to
a
studies
or
a
special
meeting.
Instead.
C
Okay,
transportation
and
the
environment.
Well,
I
I
guess
the
issue
of
the
bike
lane
where
I
fell
because
there's
a
big,
ditch
and
the
issue
was
it
was
on
san
san
salvador
because
we
moved
our
farmers
market
away
from
the
nice
part
of
town
where
the
rich
people
now
can
eat
eat
their.
You
know:
high
falutin
meals,
restaurants
and
the
poor.
People
are
now
having
to
go
to
the
farmer's
market,
down
the
bad
side
of
town.
C
So
that
that's
another
issue,
but
the
issue
is
that
there's
really
actually
the
three
one
one
worked
pretty
good
so
that
I
was
really
happy
actually.
Finally,
after
I
called
a
lot
of
people
to
talk
about
the
problem
to
have
it
fixed,
you
know
and
nobody
answers
the
phone
nobody's
answering
phones.
Now
it's
like
the
google
subscriber
would
like
to
get
your
message.
You
know,
of
course
they
don't
want
to
talk
to
me.
So
I
don't
hear
from
anybody,
but
this
is
terrible.
The
way
our
city
is
being
run.
C
Is
that
nobody's
home
literally
and
nobody's
calling
back,
but
this
is
another
issue,
and
but
the
issue
with
transportation
and
the
environment
is
that
the
3-1-1
worked
pretty
good
to
deal
with
that
problem,
but
in
terms
of
our
overall
issues
in
our
community
like
the
way
stockton
avenue
is
a
very
poorly
designed
street
and
and
how
we
have
left.
No
left-hand
turn
signals
at
both
taylor
street
and
now
in
london,
and
that
we've
had
a
death
on
lens
in
and
my
husband
got
hit
on
his
bicycle
on
on
on
taylor
and
stockton.
C
So
you
know:
where
does
this
database
and
that's
what
I've
been
talking
to
about
the
transportation
people?
Is
that
why
you
know
where
does
this
go
into?
Like
I
speak
to
some
of
the
people
at
dot?
One
of
the
head
woman.
I
forgot
her
name,
but
you
know.
Basically,
you
know.
Is
there
a
database
where
our
concerns
about
our
infrastructure
go
and-
and
I
don't
hear
anything
back-
and
you
know
this-
this
forum
is
not
gonna
come
back
with
it
either.
D
Hi
blair
beekman
here
sean
cartwright
is
the
person
who
I
was
trying
to
reference
in
the
last
item
about
how
we
can
better
place
people
and
to
make
sure
to
place
them
within
their
district
in
the
future
of
housing.
To
thank
thank
you
to
dev
davis.
For
her
words,
it
is
my
hope
that
that
is
all
that
this
item
is
is
about
is,
is
that
is
to
take
away
just
a
simple
procedural
thing,
but
I
thought
you
know
to
be
na
to
it's
a
work
plan.
D
That's
like
a
six
month
work
plan
and
for
that
to
be
taken
away
it
I
questioned
what.
That
is.
Why
that's
happening.
I
mean
it'll,
be
a
very
nice
explanation,
we'll
be
hearing
november
8th,
and
so
I
I
hope
we
that
a
future
work
plan
can
be
available
to
the
public,
and
I
just
I
don't
quite
know
the
language
how
to
ask
that
question.
D
But
I
hear
what
council
president
davis
is
saying,
and
so
thank
you
for
that,
and
hopefully
we
can
work
that
out
exactly
what
that
is
and
that's
good
practices
of
a
community.
That's
learning
to
leave
the
double
speak
and
just
talking
to
ourselves
honestly
and
directly
thanks
a
lot.
B
Thank
you.
The
person
with
the
number
ending
five
one,
four
zero.
P
The
idea
about
transportation
in
this
city
is
a
disaster.
It's
not
smart.
The
bike
lanes
are
too
wide
the
downtown.
The
way
that
they
did
the
bike
lanes
downtown
is
totally
screwed
up.
P
People
who
are
in
wheelchairs
can't
get
to
the
bus
because
of
the
stupid
scooters
who
authorized
those
scooters,
that's
the
most
dangerous
thing
in
the
world,
the
way
that
they
ride
those
scooters
in
the
bike
lanes.
It's
a
disaster.
The
the
potholes
are
everywhere.
It
takes
months
to
get
them
fixed.
Sometimes
sometimes
they
can
be
fixed
in
twenty
24
hours
or
24
months,
which
is
interesting.
How
fast
or
slow
it
could
be.
The
311
app
is
terrible.
P
I've
called
before
3-1-1
to
get
potholes
fixed
anyone
who's
got
a
problem
with
that
call
3-1-1,
typically
they've
been
pretty
good.
Lately,
no
tess
is
correct.
Nobody
pick
a
lot
of
people,
not
picking
up
the
phones,
especially
city
council
people.
Every
one
of
you
should
be
ashamed
of
yourself,
deb
davis,
if
you're
listening,
you're
the
worst
your
office
is
the
worst
in
the
world.
Pam
foley's
isn't
far
behind.
P
No
one
gets
back
to
you.
Emails
tell
you
guys
are
just
too
good.
You
got
a
bunch
of
queens
working
down
there
literally
quit.
You
got
a
bunch
of
royal
family
members
working
as
a
day
job,
not
picking
up
the
phone
you
and
the
san
jose
police
department
ultimate
worst.
Try
calling
them
if
there's
a
problem.
If
you
have
a
question,
they
will
never
they.
You
want
to
talk
about
too
good,
that's
them,
but
getting
back
to
transportation,
getting
rid
of
parking
not
going
to
help.
E
Thank
you
vice
mayor
now,
just
as
a
general
comment
with
regards
to
previous
discussion,
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
if
sometimes
you
took
public
comment
after
the
discussion
rather
than
before,
but
anyway.
Here
we
go
the
thing
I
want
to
touch
on
on
transportation
and
and
housing.
E
E
We
get
to
start
being
careful
that
we
don't
go
around
destroying
our
transportation
infrastructure
in
the
process,
and
I
will
see
what
just
happened
in
gilroy
is
a
pretty
good
example
of
what
not
to
do,
but
now,
let's
start
moving
at
the
vtli
trail
and
the
santa
teresa
station
that
my
council
member,
sergey
joe
imanes,
is
pushing
for
absolutely
I've
been
pushing
on
this
for
years,
but
you
got
to
be
careful
what
you're
doing
it's
a
massive
site?
E
It's
34
acres
1200
parking
spaces,
but
this
split
right
down
the
middle
either
by
the
light
rail
tracks
than
the
station,
and
you
have
to
be
careful
on
which
side
you're
going
to
be
doing
either
housing
or
rv
parking
or
whatever.
E
Specifically,
right
now
we're
using
half
of
the
area
for
kobe
testing
that
does
not
be
area
to
be
doing
rv
parking,
because
that
is
the
area
ultimately,
that
the
people
who
have
to
drive
to
the
station
use
on
the
other
side.
You
have
the
bus
station
and
you've
got
something
very
important.
There.
You've
actually
got
a
bathroom
there
that
these
people
need.
So
you
have
to
be
careful
moving
forward.
E
A
B
Okay,
last
but
not
least,
is
open
forum
and
first
speaker
is
tessa.
C
Okay,
thank
you.
What
can
you
hear
me?
Oh
okay,
good!
Thank
you.
Well,
I
appreciate
what
roland
was
saying.
You
know
that
community
engagement
was
very
important
and
actually
I
met
a
woman
that
was
telling
me.
I
think
I
told
you
all
this
in
the
alameda
at
the
city
of
alameda,
where
there's
a
lot,
they
have
control
of
what
happens
in
their
neighborhood
he's
like
wow,
that
that's
that's
revolutionary.
C
You
know
and
that's
what
we're
looking
for
and
even
the
issues
of
what
you
know.
Deb
davis
is
saying
you
know
that
we
need
to
you
know:
she's
fighting
the
housing
requirements
of
the
state,
but
we
need
so.
We
need
so
she's
talking
about
local
control
yet,
but
we
don't
have
that
in
our
own
neighborhoods.
We
don't
have
that
and
that
you
guys
have
you
know
when
you
do
your
general
plan.
You
do
so
poor
about
reaching
out
to
us,
because
there
were
two
general
plans
that
affected
my
neighborhood.
C
The
new
general
plan
review
that
she
was
on,
that
it
was
one
one
h
and
the
h
was
that
it
was
about
housing
and
that
we
keep
housing
away
from
businesses,
because
we
want
to
protect
businesses
in
our
community.
Instead
of
you
know,
you
know
demanding
that
they
don't
pollute
and
they
don't
create
noise
and
create
a
quality
of
life
for
the
neighbors,
who
have
been
here
first
we're
here.
C
First,
the
ohlone's
were
here:
first,
the
people,
not
the
businesses
and
this
whole
thing
of
keeping
business
being
business
friendly
and
not
people
friendly,
has
to
change.
That's
the
change
and
it's
all
blah
blah
blah
about
housing,
because
you
fought
housing
in
your
general
plan.
Deb
davis
fought
housing
was
all
about
jobs.
B
All
right,
blair.
D
D
A
simple
reminder:
no
one
at
the
local
level
should
have
to
be
held
responsible
to
ideas
of
debt
burden
in
this
possible
man-made
creation
of
a
global
pandemic,
not
tenants
or
owners
for
all
the
good
backup
plans.
The
sj
housing
department
offered
last
night
with
expanded
lawyer
and
counseling
services
as
state
vixen
moratorium
is
ending
september.
30Th,
a
reminder
that
most
owners
and
tenants
want
to
try
to
work
in
good
terms.
D
Please
continue
to
learn
how
to
how
we
can
more
honestly
talk
about
the
possible
future
directions
of
covid19
and
its
variants.
The
vaccine
process,
aerosol
vaccines,
this
fall
and
aerosol
vaccines,
this
fall
and
how
we
can
continue
to
respect
weekly,
coveted
tests
and
48-hour
tests
before
live
events.
D
A
reminder
that,
with
much
new
ai
data
collection
practices,
this
fall
alpr
practices
has
brought
previous
needs
of
holding
onto
people's
data
for
a
year
down
to
six
months
and
down
to
three
months.
This
more
efficient
system
is
based
on
policy
practices
of
more
open
democracy,
civil
rights
and
civil
protections.
These
are
simply
ideas
of
heart,
humanity
and
positiveness,
and
what
can
be
more
interesting,
accessible
ideas
of
innovation?
D
A
good
luck,
how
city
government
staff
can
continue
the
efforts
of
open,
clear,
factual
counsel
and
committee
agenda
item
topics
this
fall
and
for
us
to
all
feel
what
can
be
more
positive,
open,
good
community
democratic
practices.
This
fall.
These
are
good
reason,
practices
that
do
not
have
to
involve
the
use
of
money.
Thanks
a
lot.
P
Yeah,
I
just
I
still
can't
get
over
this
whole
tobacco
blocking
the
the
the
flavor
tobaccos
and
hookahs.
You
guys
get
tax
money
from
that,
but
you
have
marijuana.
That's
legal!
I'm
really
convinced
that
you
guys
want
to
get
rid
of
tobacco
and
have
everybody
smoking
marijuana,
because
you
get
more
money
from
it
right.
P
If
you
want
to
buy
these
things,
you're
going
to
have
to
go
online
or
indian
reservations
and,
furthermore,
for
hookah,
I
think
that
there
should
be
a
foundation
of
middle
eastern
culture
where
you
can
go
smoke,
a
hookah
pipe
and
everybody's
welcome,
and
it
could
be
like
a
501c3
type
thing.
That's
for
cultural
events
or
or
a
place
of
culture,
and
this
way
you
guys
won't
get
any
money
from
taxes
matter
of
fact.
You'll
probably
have
to
subsidize
it.
P
P
The
way
you
the
way
you
waste
money
and
what
you,
what
you
think,
should
be
sold,
bought
and
sold,
or
bought
and
sold
at
a
certain
time,
like
carrasco
dictating
when
you
can
buy
a
can
of
beer
on
the
east
side,
I
mean
you,
people
are
a
bunch
of
puritanical
weirdos.
I
swear
I've.
Never
ever
seen
so
many
people
so
delusional
about
how.