►
Description
City of San José, California
Joint meeting of Rules and Open Government / Committee of the Whole of September 15, 2021
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=890597&GUID=EB459ED4-CBDE-45CC-8D32-2077182155AC
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
C
B
A
D
A
B
E
B
B
A
C
Instead
of
clicking
on
it,
we
do
have
an
ad
sheet,
it's
to
add
ab361
resolution,
I'll
pull
it
up
in
just
a
second.
B
Okay,
thank
you
and
now
we'll
go
to
our
members
of
the
public
and
as
a
reminder,
we
are
speaking
on
the
review
of
the
september
28th.
Excuse
me
yeah
september
28,
2021
final
agenda
item
and
if
you're
on
zoom,
you
can
use
the
the
raise
hand
function
with
us
here
or
press
star
9.
B
E
Okay,
sorry,
yes,
thank
you,
paul
soto
from
the
horseshoe.
First
of
all,
I'd
like
to
extend
my
gratitude
to
councilwoman
adrenals
for
her
advocacy
yesterday.
My
ancestors
never
had
an
opportunity
to
have
someone
like
you
to
speak
on
their
behalf.
So
on
their
behalf
and
myself,
I
want
to
say
thank
you
again.
Secondly,
I
would
like
to
refer
to
the
amounts
of
money
that
are
going
out
and
the
land
resulting
issues
on
the
consent
calendars.
E
I
think
that
this
needs
to
be
at
least
you
know,
like
somebody
has
to
kind
of
review
that
and
see
if
there's
any
possibility
that
they
can
be
brought
to
the
to
the
regular
agenda
items.
Secondly,
the
the
crane
heightened
issues
is
that
we
had
a
discussion
about
this
a
few
months
back,
both
blair
and
I,
with
councilman
perales
and
councilman
process,
agreed
specifically
to
that.
E
If
those
cranes
are
up
beyond
a
specific
date
that
we
have
to
decentralize
the
the
developers
from
doing
that,
and-
and
he
agreed
on
record
for
that-
but
I
just
don't
see
it
reflected
here,
and
so
I
would
like
to
ask
if
that
specific
topic
can
be
revisited
and
that
the
that
the
fines
for
kicking
those
cranes
up
beyond
a
certain
date
is
is
exorbitant.
E
Thirdly,
the
eviction
moratorium.
This
there
has
been
no
talk.
Absolutely
no,
even
you
know
no
dialogue.
With
respect
to
this.
I
think
that
what
it
is
that
the
entire
city-
well,
no,
no,
I
won't
say
the
entire
city,
specific
populations
in
the
city
that
are
probably
the
most
vulnerable,
absolutely
need
the
most
advocacy
and
the
lack
of
advocacy
from
the
city
as
a
whole.
I
I
think,
is
irresponsible
and
I
think
it's
not
really
fulfilling
the
mandates
that
you
swore
to
when
you
became
a
politician
to
begin
with.
Thank
you.
F
Hi,
thank
you
glory.
Beekman
here,
happy
wednesday,
happy
heading
towards
the
end
of
the
month
and
to
speak
to
the
to
the
september
28th
agenda.
Item
3.5
is
about
adoption
of
a
regulation
of
a
resolution
apologizing
to
chinese
immigrants
and
their
descendants
to
quickly
offer.
There
was
mention
yesterday
that
there's
some
work
going
on
on
the
future
of
the
of
a
coveyed
19
task
force,
possibly
an
economic
task
force.
It's
called
aaci
was
supposed
to
help
contribute
to
that
process
and
it
was
questioned.
F
What
exactly
their
role
will
be.
I
hope
just
to
mention
their
name
at
this
time
can
help
along
good
practices.
That
sounds
like
a
good
program
to
prepare
ourselves
for
this
next
year
and
the
next
few
years.
Thank
you
for
it
to
consider
the
the
item
of
a
eviction
moratorium
and
to
comment
on
paul's
words.
First
of
all,
first
of
all,
I
remember
we
having
the
conversation
paul
mentioned
about
the
cranes
back
in
january.
It
was
at
a
public
meeting,
I
think,
rules
and
open
government.
F
So
thanks
for
that
memory,
I
hope
we
can
continue
what
paul
was
asking
for
about
the
eviction
moratorium
stuff.
It's
also
on
your
next
week's
agenda
october
5th.
These
things
should
have
been
planned
in
the
month
of
september,
because
you
know,
if
you
do
these
things
in
the
beginning
of
october,
people
are
going
to
be
panicked
and
rushed
after
the
september
30th
day.
Why
did
you
want
to
choose
to
work?
F
That
way
I
mean
you
put
us
under
stress
where
we
could
be
planning
and
talking
and
what
paul
was
saying
just
an
openness.
You
know
there
can
be
ways
to
talk
about
the
eviction
moratorium
after
september
30th.
There
can
be
allowances,
but
we
have
to
talk
about
these
things
openly
and
make
things
clear.
Thank
you.
G
You
know,
first
of
all,
the
first
time
I
went
to
rules
to
figure
out.
You
know
that
we
have
to
do
all
the
studying,
because
you
do
not
read
the
agenda.
I
think
you
really
should
read
the
agenda
out
loud
and
on
top
of
it
there
wasn't
anything
the
agenda
wasn't
there
until
like
an
hour
ago,
not
even
an
hour
ago
like
well,
I
checked
back,
like
you
know,
15
minutes
ago
I
mean
that's
wrong.
I
know
that's
wrong.
You
know
it
shouldn't
be
that
way.
G
If
this
is
rules
and
open
government
for
the
whole-
and
I
and
I
check
three
times
and
the
agenda's
not
there,
and
then
it's
just
there
like
five
minutes
before
that's
ridiculous,
and
so
that
that's
a
problem,
but
I
won't
hear
anything
from
you
I'll
keep
having
to
write
the
manager
to
get
this
straightened
out,
because
I
don't
appreciate
that,
and
so
in
terms
of
general
issues
about
housing.
You
know
what
I'm
saying
is
that
well,
I
am
actually
talking
to
the
people
who
are
protesting.
G
What
happened
to
them
in
their
neighborhood
at
vista,
vista
montana,
and
the
issue
at
the
root
is
a
lot
of
our
public
comments
is
about
that.
They
were
not
notified
and
it's
the
same
issue
that
I'm
having
in
my
neighborhood.
We
were
not
notified
that
there
was
a
general
plan
change.
Nobody
sent
us
an
em,
something
in
the
mail
saying.
How
do
you
feel
about
having
a
five-story
hotel
in
your
neighborhood?
You
didn't
do
that,
and
so
this
is
part
this
is
now
becoming.
G
A
trend
is
what
I'm
seeing
and
it
needs
to
stop
and
we
need
to.
We
need
to.
You
know
just
make
it
right.
It
has
to
stop
that.
We
need
to
undo
whatever
you're
doing
and
that's
why
I
don't
want
a
hotel
and
it
needs
to
stop
and
they
don't
want
the
homeless
in
their
neighborhood
until
we
redo
it
and
get
public
input,
that's
how
it
needs
to
go
forward
and
then
the
other
thing
is
about
housing
and
and
matt
mahan
is
saying
we're
going
to
do
this
whole
thing
with
housing.
G
D
Yeah
hi
thanks
thanks
so
much
my
only
question,
I
didn't
see
the
little
recording
light
started
on
this
and
I
wasn't
sure
if
that
means
it
was
it's
being
recorded.
Another
way,
that's
my
only
comment
on
this
on
this.
I
I
appreciate
you
letting
me
speak.
C
Yeah,
council
committees
and
city
council
meetings
are
recorded
through
the
create
tv
team,
not
through
just
plain
zoom
recording
plane.
Zoom
recording
is
done
for,
like
words
and
commission
meetings.
B
Okay
next
speaker
will
be
bill
dowling
and
just
as
a
reminder
bill.
We
are
currently
speaking
on
the
final
agenda
for
september
28th.
H
Yeah,
thank
you
very
much
for
the
time
and
if
I
understand
correctly,
the
subject
of
utilizing
the
santa
clara
county
fairgrounds
to
provide
further
shelter
for
the
unhealth
as
part
of
that
agenda.
B
No
not
at
the
moment,
okay,
there
is
a.
There
is
a
an
agenda
item
later
today
that
we'll
we'll
discuss
that.
I
Okay,
I
just
wanted
to
address
the
eviction
moratorium
and
I
would
like
to
ask
how
the
eviction
moratorium
does
not
apply
to
the
residents
who
are
living
at
cersei,
who
are
being
evicted
and
maybe
just
something
to
consider
and
also
the
creative
use
of
a
brand
new
term.
I
You
know-
and
you
know
exactly
what
I'm
talking
about
councilmember
perales.
I
also
wanted
to
mention
that
a
previous
caller
had
mentioned
vista
montana.
It's
not
that
the
people
don't
want
them
there,
because
they
weren't
notified.
They
don't
want
them
there,
because
they're
classist
and
assume
that
everyone
is
a
pedophile.
I
So
I
just
want
to
correct
that,
but
the
eviction
moratorium
should
have
blair
was
right.
The
eviction
moratorium
should
have
been
considered
long
ago
so
that
people
weren't
getting
down
to
the
wire
and
completely
and
totally
freaked
out
that,
oh,
my
god,
what
am
I
going
to
do
and
fleeing
their
homes
when
we're
out
there
working
in
the
camps?
We've
seen
the
camps
grow,
larger
and
larger
and
larger,
and
it's
because
people
were
being
unlawfully
evicted
and
it's
just
going
to
explode,
and
if
this
goes.
I
B
I'm
sorry
I
apologize.
I
was
on
mute.
I
don't
see
any
other
attendees
with
their
hands
up.
Oh,
I
do
see
now
one
our
last
public
commenter
will
be
gail,
osmer
and
gail.
Just
as
a
reminder
we're
speaking
on
the
review
of
the
september
28th
final
agenda.
J
Yes,
council
member,
thank
you.
I'm
sorry,
listen!
I'm
kind
of
confused
on
3.6
of
the
agenda
for
the
28th
you're,
talking
about
this
fencing
and
spring
and
ashbury,
and
around
that
era
we
know
they're
going
to
be
fencing,
but
I've
been
told
that
the
rvs
can
park
on
ashbury
street
and,
during
this
whole,
horrendous
abatement
that
you
all
are
doing.
J
That's
what
I've
been
told.
So
maybe
we
better
get
it
you
know
figured
out.
Are
we
going
to
close
ashbury
and
if
that's
going
to
happen
when
so,
I
was
kind
of
confused
about
this
whole
item,
because
people
are
parking
there,
I've
been
told
I
can
tell
them
from
city,
so
I'm
kind
of
confused
on
it
all.
Thank
you.
So
much.
B
K
Thank
you
vice
chair.
What
I
was
going
to
suggest
is
if
we
could
have
maybe
a
time
certain
for
a
couple
of
the
items,
and
I
just
clicked
off
of
the
item,
I
think
it's
item
17.
It
has
to
do
with
tobacco
flavors
and
banning
the
band
that
that
has
gotten
a
lot
of
feedback.
I
think,
as
you
probably
have
seen
in
your
inbox,
is
there's
a
lot
of
folks
who
are
advocating.
K
So
I'm
going
to
guess
that
there's
going
to
be
a
significant
number
of
speakers,
and
I
would
like
to
see
a
time
certain
on
that.
B
Those
are
items,
seven
point,
one
and
seven
point
two
which
are
I'll
ask
that
are
those
being
heard
together
or
no.
L
They
aren't
being
heard
together,
they're
two
separate
presentations,
but
it
does
make
sense
to
hear
them
in
that
sequence.
However,
so
the
committee
does
agree,
I
would
recommend
doing
time
certain
for
both
of
them.
B
K
Yes,
those
those
are
the
two
items
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
agenda,
including
the
ad
slip,
and
then
I'm
open
to
what
the
rules
committee
thinks
about
the
time
frame
for
7.1.
B
Trying
to
get
a
a
time
that
might
you
know
that
might
work?
Is
there
going
to
be
a
verbal
report
from
the
city
manager
covered
update
on
that
on
correct.
L
There
will
be
probably
about
15,
slides
and
I
don't
think
it'll
be
one
of
the
longer
ones,
but
we
do
plan
on
giving
a
covet
update.
B
The
fencing
project
might
generate
some
some
commentary
too
just
trying
to
determine
if
we
should
be
looking
at
like
a
6
p.m
or
sooner,
and
then
we
do
have
a
couple
other
items
after
that,
the
other
one
that
I
think
might
generate
some
commentary
is
the
eviction
moratorium
as
well,
and
then
the
evening
session
is
cancelled.
So
you
know
I
think,
generally
we
picked
around
six
o'clock
on
these
items
for
time
certains
when
we
thought
that
you
know
we're
going
to
get
a
lot
of
public
commentary.
B
I
think
that
you
know
that
would
be
fine
as
far
as
based
on
what
I'm
looking
on
the
agenda,
I'm
happy
to
you
know
hear
other
thoughts,
though,
from
from
our
colleagues
councilman
dennis.
Would
that
be
fine
with
you
for
the
time
certain.
B
Okay-
and
I
see
our
chair
is
back-
we
don't
have
a
second,
so
okay,
councilman
davis,
second,
and
I'm
going
to
hand
it
back
over
to
you,
chair.
M
I
was
going
to
ask
you
to
close
it
out,
but
I'll
take
it
and
I'm
sure
that
you
did
another
outstanding
job
filling
in.
So
thank.
G
M
K
I
I
apologize
I'm
completely
out
of
order,
but
just
going
back
to
this
one
particular
item
that
we
were
talking
about
from
what
I
have
recognized
on
the
emails
there's
a
lot
of
end
from
past
committee
meetings,
especially
from
nsc.
We
have
a
lot
of
young
folks
who
come
in,
and
so
I
wonder,
if
maybe
I
don't
know
if
it
would
be
better
to
do
it.
Just
a
tad
bit
earlier
said
that.
K
You
know
that
that
we
don't
compete
with
homework
time.
I
wouldn't
want
us
a
lot
of
parents
getting
upset
with
us,
so
I
wonder
if
maybe
an
if
we
could
have
something.
I
don't
know
something
around
three
or
three
thirty,
and
that
way
we
can
hear
those
younger
voices
and.
K
I
know
so
I
know,
but
the
most
of
the
time
a
lot
of
the
times
we
don't
accommodate
our
younger
folks.
We
think
about
parents
who
are
working,
and
then
you
know
after
work
that
kind
of
thing,
I'm
just
throwing
it
out
there.
M
From
what
I've
been
in
the
past
yeah,
the
trade-off
is,
you
know
we
accommodate.
You
know
the
students
before
you
know
the
dinner
hour
or
before
they
start
doing
their
homework,
and
then
we
could
potentially
inconvenience
the
parents
who
are
working
and
who
also
want
to
attend.
So
maybe
maybe
a
sweeter
spot
might
be
five.
Do
you
think
I
love
it.
K
M
M
And
is
that
okay
with
the
seconder
awesome
all
right,
tony?
Well,
I'm
sorry
brother!
I
see
you
have
your
hand
up
again.
B
Oh
yeah,
I
think
I
think
you
landed
on
a
good
spot.
I
I
was
just
gonna
mention
as
well.
It's
I
think
we
always
struggle
on
this,
because
we
never
know
what
the
right
time
is
to
get
the
most
participation,
I'm
thinking
of
my
nephew
who's
in
high
school
and
he's
practicing
football
after
after
class.
So
you
know
3
30
to
5
or
whatever,
or
something
like
that,
and
you
know
he's
not
accessible,
so
it's
just
so
hard
right
to
try
and
and
find
a
spot.
That's
going
to
be
accommodating
of
the
most
participants.
B
C
L
M
M
M
G
Okay,
good,
thank
you.
The
issue
of
the
housing
that
matt
mahan
is
looking
at
or
whoever
is
looking
at
all
the
housing
issues
that
we're
dealing
with
in
our
housing
crisis,
and
the
only
thing
I've
come
up
with
is
in
my
understanding
of
the
housing
crisis.
Is
that
there's
a
model
that
the
christian
community
has
been
using,
where
they
have
four
adults
and
I'll
just
call
them?
G
Teachers
are
living
with
four
homeless
people,
and
what
I
like
about
that-
and
I
guess
it's
been
successful-
that's
how
that's
the
model
they're
using
and
I
think
the
benefit
of
that
is
the
you
know
that
you
know
a
lone
monkey
is
a
dead
monkey
and
just
having
the
constant
connection
with
another
human
being,
I
think,
is
very
critical
and
what
happens
to
homeless
people
is
they
get
very
broken
from
all
the
time
that
they
spend
alone?
So
that's
part
of
the
problem,
and
so
what
I've
been
thinking
about
is
actually
I
want
one.
G
You
know
one
issue
that
we
could
have
is
to
buy
the
property
at
615
stockton
avenue.
That's
proposed
to
be
a
hotel
to
do
a
homeless
program
like
this,
where
there'd
be
like
three
houses
where
there'd
be
eight
people
living
in
each
home
and
then
in
the
center
would
be
a
garden
where
they'd
be
growing
food
and
and
on
top
of
that
nature,
heals.
G
G
F
Hi,
thank
you,
tess,
and
I
have
talked
about
her
ideas
of
shared
housing
with
people
who
are
maybe
a
more
regular
part
of
society,
place
them
with
people
who
are
not.
I
think
it's
a
really
interesting
idea
and
that
it
should
always
have
a
garden
wherever
they
build
this
housing,
I'm
really
catching
on
to
tessa's
ideas
of
gardening
and
the
importance
of
what
gardening
can
teach
ourselves
for
our
future
and
so
yeah.
F
So
I'm
I
hope
to
continue
to
talk
about
these
things
as
tessa
will
to
talk
about
the
affordable
housing
items
and
and
eviction
rental
assistance
things
one
more
time.
F
You
know
it
is
my
understanding
that,
if,
if
you're,
if
you're
after
the
september,
30th
moratorium
date
that
you've
warned
us
about
and
that
a
tenant
can
still
try
to
apply
for
state
funding
subsidy
help,
even
if
an
owner
sues
them
for
eviction
and
can
be
protected
until
march
2022,
that's
the
county
ways
to
work
and
that's
the
county
eviction
moratorium
deadline.
F
After
that,
then
a
person
may
be
vulnerable
after
september
30th
after
you
know,
to
be
to
be
sued,
an
order,
an
owner
can
continue
proceedings,
but
I
wish
you
could
have
explained
all
this
more
during
this
month
of
september,
and
we
can
talk
about
this
more
in
the
future.
Good
luck
with
affordable
housing
ideas
and
all
your
an
eli
bli
mixed
income.
How
much?
F
I
love
that
so
much
for
these
issues,
the
past
two
agendas
and
to
conclude
about
consent,
calendar
items
around
community
energy,
you've
done
some
great
work
at
the
state
level,
really
be
careful
what
you're
doing
with
yourselves
at
the
local
level
and,
let's
really
practice
renewable
energy
ideas
that
can
help
lead
us
out
of
any
difficult
natural
disaster
situations
better
in
the
future.
Thank
you.
E
Yes,
paul
soto
from
the
horseshoe-
I
I
just
I
I
can't
help
but
talk
about
there's
upwards
of
80
million
dollars
going
through
the
consent
calendar
in
just
these
two
calendars,
the
last
one
in
this
one,
80
million
that
that
is,
that
is
just
I'm
just
gonna-
leave
that
there
I'm
just
going
to
leave
that
one
there.
E
Secondly,
devcon
there's
no
bid
for
that
housing,
that's
going,
which
is
I've
tried
extremely
interesting.
This
is
going
to
be
a
very
interesting
sociological
experiment
of
having
that
housing
and
proximity
to
the
police
department.
That
is
going
to
be
interesting,
but
my
concern
is:
there
is
no
bid
and
we're
talking
in
excess
of
eight
million
dollars
to
devcon.
Just
here
automatically
yours
don't
even
trip.
E
I
think
that's
a
fundamental
question
that
that,
as
a
as
a
citizen
in
the
community
and
considering
that
the
that
the
council
has
a
fiduciary
responsibility
as
well
as
a
civic
responsibility
to
the
community,
that
the
fiduciary
responsibility
was,
I
don't
know-
maybe
it
wasn't
maybe
looked
at
as
very
you
know
as
closely
as
it
could
have
been
or
but
there
is,
like,
I
said,
excess
of
80
million
and
no
bids
with
devcon
and
there's
there's
there's
almost
like
a
like
a
knowledge
that
you
know
what's
going
to
happen
on
the
30th
in
terms
of
what
the
council's
gonna
do
and
what
it
actually
failed
to
do.
M
Thank
you
person
with
the
number
ending
in
7327.
M
A
Good
afternoon
council,
member
and
members
of
the
rules
committee,
sean
callie
right,
I
apologize.
Yes,
you
just
joined
a
little
bit
late.
I
wanted
to
talk
briefly
about
item
7.2
on
the
draft
agenda
for
the
28th
of
september
and
it
has
to
do
with
smoke-free
housing.
We've
been.
C
Hi,
I'm
calling
about
the
I'm
talking
about
the
fairgrounds
that
it's
a
county-owned
property
to
be
used
for
the
benefit
of
all
in
the
county,
children's
teens
seniors
and
should
not
be
used
for
one
specific
population
only
which
is
the
unhoused
district.
Seven
is
an
area
that's
already
overcrowded
and
it
lacks
in
parks
and
open
space
for
its
current
residents.
It
also
has
an
elementary
school
adjacent.
M
Sorry
for
interrupting
for
a
second,
so
are
you
speaking
to
councilmember
manza.
C
M
M
Okay
and
probably
it
might
be
shorter
than
that,
I'm
terrible
at
estimating
so
just
take
that
with
a
grain
of
salt.
Thank
you
all
right.
The
person
with
the
number
ending
is
73
27.
go
ahead.
I
Yeah
I
was
wanting
to
speak
on
council
member
mayhem's
proposal
as
well.
Okay,.
M
Okay,
bring
it
back
to
the
committee.
B
C
M
M
Okay,
next
up
on
the
agenda,
is
upcoming
special
meeting
agenda
review,
the
september
30
2021
pension
obligation,
respective
roles
and
responsibilities
for
polity
policy
development
study
session
agenda.
E
E
E
E
You
know
me
it
just
you
know,
I'm
not
a
financial
officer,
but
I
think
it's
really
easy
to
assume
that
the
pension
obligations
to
the
city
is
going
to
far
exceed
the
amounts
of
money
that
is
in
the
fund.
That's
just
a
very
basic
way
of
of
measuring
what
it
is
that
we're
faced
with
right
now
or
we're
going
to
run
out
very
soon.
E
So
what
I'd
like
to
know
is
that
number
one,
the
city,
the
city
services
and
the
city
employees
it's
going
to
have
to
expand
because
of
the
400
000
people
that
you
guys
already
planned.
That
is
going
to
come
here.
So
that
means
it's
going
to
have
to
to
to
to
it's
going
yeah.
It's
gonna
have
to
expand.
So
with
that
said,
what
kind
of
preparations
is
being
made
for
that
is
there
any
is?
F
M
F
Hi,
thank
you.
There
are
a
lot
of
people.
You
know
a
lot
of
letters
in
the
public
record
this
week.
It
was
nice
to
see
you
know
I
I
feel
council
person
cohen,
you
know
he's
new
and-
and
he
made
an
incredible
decision
yesterday
about
the
the
the
the
the
curtner
monterey
highway
issue
of
not
just
thinking
about
surveillance
cameras
needed,
but
how
we
con
consider,
barriers
and
and
and
narrowing
the
large
monterey
highway
as
it
is.
F
F
They
they
figured
out
some
really
important,
good
steps,
but
didn't
know
the
final
step
of
talking
more
openly
with
with
community
persons.
You
know
good
luck,
how
you
have
to
continue
with
this
issue?
Is
it
a
sense
that
you
know
you've
done
some
things
really
well
with
this
item,
but
but
can
we
maybe
we
work
on
a
notification
process
in
the
future?
How
that
can
be
better
developed
and
it
can
be
placed
in
that
area
to
say
this
will
be
coming
soon.
You
know
call
this
number.
F
If
you
have
any
questions
and
people
walking
a
dog,
can
you
know
it
develops
a
little
organization
how
a
commun
a
neighborhood
can
organize
better
and
we
have
to
be
thinking
of
these
sorts
of
steps,
even
if
we
don't
want
to
I'm
also
worried
about
the
arsenic
and
and
and
poison
levels,
contaminants
within
the
soil.
You
know
michelle
obama
used
to
always
offer
you
know
these
fennel
plants
and
plants
like
that.
E
Yes
possible
from
horseshoe.
First
of
all
I
got
I
got
to
tip
my
hat,
and
I've
got
to
say
just
this.
This
community
is
is,
by
far
the
most
active,
the
most
united,
the
most
vociferous
that
I've
ever
seen.
I
have
not
seen
this
I've
been
doing
this
for
three
years.
Okay,
I
have
never
seen
this
amount
of
complete
commitment
to
ensuring
that
their
community
is
safe,
not
only
from
people
that
they
feel
might
threaten
it,
but
that
they
are
also
safe
from
the
politicians.
E
This
is,
I
think
we
need
to
explore
that
a
little
bit,
because
it's
worthy
of
exploration,
because
I've
sat
there
and
I've
listened.
I've
read
to
the
commitment
that
you
know
because
there's
sworn
officers
just
like
the
police
department,
politicians
are
sworn
to
the
duty
of
the
not
only
the
upholding
of
the
constitution,
but
also
the
safety
and
security
of
the
residents.
Well,
sometimes
that
safety
and
security
from
the
residents
requires
safety
and
security
from
the
politicians
that
stand
over
them.
E
Sometimes
it
goes
into
reverse
and
and-
and
I
think
that,
as
as
a
society
we
have
to
be
okay
with
that,
we
have
to
be
very
okay,
that
politicians
can
put
our
lives
in
danger,
and
I
think
this
is
a
perfect
example
of
that.
You
see
because
look
if
a
parent
knowingly
put
a
child
into
an
area
where
they
knew
that
there
was
arsenic,
you
would
have
cps
foster
care
every
single
one
of
those
agencies
that
councilwoman
arenas
advocates
for
and
on
behalf
of,
like
a
soldier.
She
does
this.
E
M
Thank
you
bringing
it
back
to
the
committee.
Can
I
get
a
motion
please.
A
Q
M
M
M
All
right,
first
public
speaker
is
paul
coyle
paul.
E
Yes,
paul
solo
from
the
horseshoe,
I
would
like
to
bring
to
attention
the
two
letters
that
were
written
by
the
behavioral
health
contractors
of
association
of
santa
clara
county
and
mr
david,
mr
dave
cheslow's
letters.
I
really
hope
that
you
take
consideration
of
these
two
letters,
I'm
going
to
quote
one
of
them.
We
are
pleased
to
see
that
the
memo
addresses
the
social
and
cultural
factors
of
stigma
that
creates
barriers,
stigmas
that
create
barriers
to
individuals
from
seeking
help.
E
We
appreciate
the
memos
specifies
that
we
need
to
work
together
towards
dispelling
the
stigma
that
is
being
considered
as
part
of
this
approach.
The
outcome
of
any
efforts
will
be
severely
diminished
if
they
concurrently
increase
that
is
so
prevalent
in
our
society.
End
quote
that
was
written
by
elisa
cough
ginsburg.
I'd
like
to
extend
my
gratitude
for
this
letter,
along
with
over
40
organizations
that
the
city
and
the
county
contract
with
okay.
E
This
right
here,
I
as
a
victim
of
domestic
violence
as
a
perpetrator
of
domestic
violence,
as
a
as
as
as
as
a
victim
of
sexual
assault,
which
I
am
all
three
I
take
great
exception
to
councilman
perales
politicizing,
violence
against
victims,
because
all
of
the
work
in
mr
david
treslow's
letter
it
states
specifically,
this
is
all
redundant
work.
Councilwoman
arenas
has
done
exceptional
job
at
the
protection
of
children
at
the
protection
of
women
and
maintaining
that
those
policies
stay
in
place,
and
this
right
here,
councilman
paulus,
you
were
using
this.
E
You
were
using
the
victims
of
this
type
of
violence
in
order
to
aggrandize
yourself
and
uplift,
your
own
political
obligations
to
your
developer
buddies.
This
is
this.
This
needs
to
stop
no
more
all
right.
A
Yeah,
thank
you
vice
mayor,
I
I
didn't
get
a
chance
to
read
the
full
memo.
Sorry,
but
I
just
want
to
speak
mainly
to
domestic
violence,
as
it
can
stays
with
people
for
the
rest
of
their
lives,
and
I
won't
go
into
my
quote-unquote
story
or
anything
like
that,
but
it's
I
just
want
to
encourage.
We
need
to
reach
out
and
and
maybe
on
a
bigger
scale.
A
President
biden
was
right:
we've
got
to
not.
Violence
is
all
over
the
place,
violence
by
our
military
and
maybe
it's
necessary.
Maybe
it's
not
the
last
20
years
might
make
us
scratch
our
head.
We
think
we
would
have
learned
after
with
the
fall
of
saigon,
but
as
a
species,
we
have
the
ability
to
end
us
and.
G
A
Not
habitable
anymore
and
there's
no
other
species
that
we
know
of
in
the
entire
universe.
That
can
do
that,
except
for
us,
and
we
don't
seem
to
take
that
seriously:
violence
on
a
national
level,
state
level,
local
level
and
in
the
family.
If
peace
starts
in
the
family,
it's
going
to
resonate
and
it's
not
a
choice
anymore.
It's
a
have
to
or
you
know
we
may
not
have
another
couple
generations.
We
we
have
weapons
of
mass
destruction.
Now
that
literally
can
end
us
and
it's
something
we
should
take.
E
M
Thank
you,
blair.
F
Hi,
thank
you.
I
guess
a
quick
nod
to
the
consent,
calendar
that
had
an
item
about
dumpster,
day
issues
and
that's
about
community
coming
together
and
learning
to
work
together,
better
vision,
zero,
that's
that
is
the
overarching
goal
of
vision,
zero.
It's
meant
to
work
kind
of
like
the
via
kaye
program
that
we
had
last
saturday
or
was
it
sunday?
F
You
know
it's
with
the
idea
that
you
know
it
is
how
to
create
a
community
effort
towards
things
and
what
council
person
peralta
is
is
another
example
of
that
what
brian
just
spoke
about
was
interesting.
Interestingly,
what
I
wanted
to
talk
about
myself
today,
the
local
level,
our
local
communities,
have
to
do
a
lot
basically
to
clean
up
the
messes
of
our
you
know:
national
and
international
governments
and
state
governments.
F
There
was
a
whole
set
of
gun
mandates
that
were
set
across
at
the
federal
level
back
in
2007
that
basically
started.
You
know
the
whole
series
of
incidents
in
mexico
led
to
past
and
furious
stuff.
It
was
just
a
massive
proliferation
of
american
manufactured
and
european
western
european
manufactured
guns
to
be
sure
to
be
sold
in
this
country
to
totally
exclude
the
eastern
european
and
russian
market.
F
Now
we
have
this
serious
gun,
violence
issues
on
our
hands
and
we
have
to
learn
to
address
this.
We
have
to
learn
to
address
the
concepts
of
state
violence,
it's
up
to
local
communities
with
their
good
practices,
care
and
decency
that
I
think,
can
really
do
that,
and
and
we
have
to
learn
how
to
work
collectively
together
at
the
local
level
and
make
very
serious
demands
in
the
future
of
our
of
our
international
and
national
governments.
I
think
we
have
that
capability
and
power.
F
I
think
we're
learning
that
capability
and
power,
and
we
have
to
learn
how
to
organize
ourselves
better
around
that.
So
this
is
good
efforts
by
council
person
perales
we're
going
to
build
in
a
really
important,
democratic,
good
future.
G
Well,
I
appreciate
what
brian
said,
but
who
knows
who
brian
is,
and
the
thing
is.
I
asked
tony
tabor
in
terms
of
our
council
to
say
the
last
name,
and
I
think
that
we
need
to
have
each
other's
names
and
also
the
ideal
thing
would
be
that
we
would
have
the
contacts
you
know
when
you
know
we
don't
even
see
who
participates.
We
can't
ask
them
to
give
us
our
card,
you
know,
and
this
way
you
are
breaking
the
community
and
the
community
is
stronger
when
we
can
connect
with
each
other.
G
G
You
don't
allow
us
to
talk
to
each
other
in
the
participating
list,
and-
and
do
you
still
hear
me
yeah
so
anyway,
that
that's
one
of
the
problems
and
the
you
know
the
way
we
we
solve
our
problems
is
through
unity
and
so
that
that's
something
that
needs
to
be
fixed,
I'm
just
going
to
put
my
other
headset
on,
because
maybe
I
can
hear
myself
anyway
and
so
and
then
basically
I
hopefully
you
hear
me,
I
was
saying
that
you
know
in
terms
of
violence
yeah.
G
We
need
to
get
rid
of
the
the
guns
of
the
police.
We
have
to
start
there
and
be
an
example.
That's
one
issue
and
that
that's
where
they
they
learned
it
in
in
a
there,
was
a
trial
where
a
policeman
put
the
gun
down
on
the
car
and
it
de-escalated
the
event.
And
so
we
have
to
be
the
first
as
leaders
we
have
to
be
the
first
to
drop
the
bomb.
You
know
to
drop
the
guns
and
also
drop
the
bombs.
G
I
mean
our
whole
society
is
so
violent
and
then,
on
top
of
it,
the
violence
that
we
that
we
produce
on
each
other.
From
the
pollution
every
time
we
we
we
pollute,
we
are
hurting
each
other.
That
is
the
that
is
the
root
of
violence
that
we
can't
tell
our
children
not
to
you
know,
kill
each
other.
When
we
every
day
we
drive
our
car
every
day
we
pollute,
we
are
killing
each
other.
Q
Hi,
my
name
is
jonathan
fleming
and
thanks
for
letting
me
speak
here,
council
member
perales,
you
know
I.
I
applaud
you
for
your
efforts
here,
especially
addressing
mental
health
and
the
aspect.
How
that
portrays
the
violence
in
our
community,
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
our
city
council,
you
know,
addresses
the
county
for
holding
them
responsible
to
their
obligations
to
us
the
residents.
So
I
hope
that's
part
of
that
here.
Going
into
this.
I
was
very
concerned
with
the
posting
and
the
noticing
of
the
meeting.
Q
You
know
instead
of
the
standard
10
days,
you
know
for
the
sunshine
rules,
this
was
posted
48
hours
or
less
prior
to
the
meeting,
and
I'm
just
wondering
does
the
brown
act
or
sunshine
apply
to
all
public
meetings,
and
if
so,
why
isn't
that
followed?
I
see
clarification
on
your
memo.
Item
number
five.
It
says
where
is
it
a
future
program
that
trains,
mental
health,
pro
professionals
to
conduct
evaluations
for
firearm
permitting?
Q
What
does
that
mean?
Is
the
city
council
going
to
get
into
the
permitting
business
now?
For
you
know,
rights
protected
by
the
second
amendment
or
what
exactly
does
that
mean?
So
that's
just
clarification,
I'm
looking
for
there.
I
also
am
seeking
clarification
on
another
issue.
Talking
about
expanding
the.
Q
Where
is
it
the
red
flag
laws?
What
exactly
are
we
going
to
be
expanding?
I
know
that
senator
cortezzi
is
working
on
that
with
d.a
rosen.
And
what
exactly
is
the
city
council
going
to
be
supporting?
If
this
is
passed?
I
think
that's
important
to
know
what
we're
supporting
before
it's
you
know
approved.
Q
And
lastly,
I
just
want
to
state
that
there
was
one
point
of
contention
and
you
said
that
you
strongly
supported
a
measure
requiring
gun
insurance.
I
think
that
was
from
the
the
june
16th
memorandum
by
mayor
ricardo
places
a
barrier,
a
financial
fee
as
a
restriction
to
the
free
exercise
of
a
right
and
that's
unconstitutional.
D
Yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you
vice
mayor
and
thank
you
council
members
for
for
hearing
this
item
and
for
councilman
krause
for
putting
something
like
this
forward
it
to
me.
It
really
shows
the
spirit
of
good
faith
efforts
for
community
outreach
and
community
collaboration,
I'll
echo
what
jonathan
just
talked
about
with
at
least
highlighting
the
health
professionals
evaluating
firearms,
permitting.
That
sounds
really
dicey
in
a
slippery
slope
that
the
city
is
trying
to
dip
its
toe
into.
I
hope
that
gets
a
lot
of
scrutiny.
D
I
also
looked
at
the
council
prioritization
early
consideration
response
form
and
it
scored
an
11..
It's
like
spinal
tap,
it's
an
11..
It
turned
up
really
high
and
to
me
that
tells
me
that
there
needs
to
be
kind
of
pump
the
brakes
a
little
bit
before
you
jump
into
that.
I
see
a
lot
of
green
things
on
the
explanations,
but
one
of
them
is
only
green
if
the
county
dives
in
with
that.
D
So
that's
a
really
important
consideration
and
I
guess
in
in
the
true
spirit
of
collaboration-
and
I
what
I
hope
councilman
cross
will
will
do-
is
really
pushed
back
on
the
june
16th
memos
with
a
dozen
or
so,
and
it's
obviously
includes
the
vice
mayor
too,
but
this
is
cosmopolis
memo
to
really
push
back
on
the
mayor's
10
plus
items
specifically
on
the
fee
and
the
insurance
until
something
like
this
is
done.
D
None
of
that
has
happened
from
the
mayor's
talking
points
when
councilmember
davis
actually
listed
some
agencies
and
organizations
and
people,
I
don't
think
any
of
them
have
been
outreach
to.
I
know
I
haven't
been
outreach
to
and
I've
been
active.
I
participated
in
a
forum
with
vice
mayor
jones.
I
really
hope
that
organizations
like
the
silicon
valley,
public
accountability
foundation,
can
be
engaged.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
your
time.
M
Thank
you
all
right
before
we
bring
it
back
to
the
panel.
I
just
want
to
make
a
note
that,
as
mentioned
in
the
early
consideration
form,
everything
was
a
green
and
one
item
that
was
a
green
was
also
a
possible
yellow,
but
I
just
wanted
everybody
to
make
note
of
that
and
going
to
hand
it
over
back
over
to
council
member
paralysts.
C
Before
you
start,
I
just
wanted
to
note
as
the
city
clerk
that
the
agenda
was
posted
on
friday,
so
we
did
follow
the
brown
act
and
also
the
city,
sun
generals.
B
Yeah,
thank
you
tony
and
appreciate
the
speakers
who
came
out
on
what
is
an
important
topic
to
me
and
and
and
although
I
I
typically
don't
respond
to
some
of
the
fallacies
purported
by
by
community
members,
I
will
say
I
take
a
personal
offense
to
to
paul
soto
reporting
that
this
may
somehow
be
politically
driven.
B
I
I
lost
a
personal
longtime
family
friend
at
this
vta
mass
shooting
and
have
dedicated
a
lot
of
time
and
effort
into
considering
a
very
thoughtful
approach
as
to
how
we
could
make
our
community
safer,
and
I
did
provide
a
slideshow
for
the
staff
if
you
don't
mind,
pulling
that
up.
I'd
like
to
walk
my
I'll
walk
through
my
memo
for
my
colleagues
and
then
and
then
happy
to
hear
staff's
response
as
well
on
the
early
consideration
form
after
yeah.
B
Thank
you
and
I'll
indicate
when
we
should
change
a
slide
so
first
off
you
know.
I
want
to
thank
the
committee
for
hearing
this
proposal
today,
I'm
proposing
what
we're
calling
a
community
violence,
prevention
and
response
initiative
and,
as
we
all
know,
in
the
midst
of
chaos
and
aftermath
of
of
mass
shootings,
like
what
we
saw
here
at
the
vta
mass
shooting
on
may
26th,
there's
always
high
profile.
B
Even
national
coverage
on
these
incidents,
but
once
the
the
cameras
and
and
the
news
media
have
left
what
remains:
is
our
community
working
to
recover
and
be
able
to
move
forward
and
hopefully
be
able
to
learn
and
improve,
and
this
is
why
I
stress
the
importance
that
what
we
are
talking
about
is
violence
happening
within
our
our
community.
B
You
can
move
to
the
next
slide.
B
Some
will
assume
that
the
problem
is
violent,
such
as
mass
shootings.
B
68
of
substance-related
homicides
nationwide
are
related
to
guns,
and
the
rate
of
suicide
risk
is
much
higher
when
an
individual
has
access
to
a
firearm,
and
in
2008
it
was
reported
that
californians
are
57
times
more
likely
to
commit
suicide.
One
week
after
purchasing
a
a
firearm,
we
can
go
to
the
next
slide.
B
So
what
I'm
proposing
is
is
not
is
not
something
that
is
going
to
be
an
end-all
be-all
to
eliminate
all
violence
in
our
city
and
as
a
former
active
duty
and
current
reserve
officer.
B
I
want
to
say
thank
you
to
our
staff
as
well,
for
your
early
consideration
form
and
for
being
able
to
issue
a
green
light
for
majority
of
the
proposals
here.
If
you
can
go
to
the
next
slide,.
B
While
we
have
not
received
reports
here
in
the
city
of
san
jose,
we
should
not
wait
until
an
incident
or
foreign
incident
to
occur
in
order
for
us
to
do
so.
The
vta
shooting
should
give
us
all
pause
and,
as
the
largest
city
in
the
south
bay,
employing
over
6
500
employees,
we
should
be
conducting
our
own
evaluation
and
be
proactive
about
it.
Furthermore,
in
speaking
with
our
county's
behavioral
health
services
department,
they
stress
the
importance
of
increasing
and
promoting
wellness
programs
for
employees.
B
The
county
is
in
the
process
of
developing
an
app,
I
believe,
to
help
their
employees
manage
stress.
I
believe
our
sjpd
sounds.
The
police
department
even
has
a
similar
app
that
promotes
physical
wellness
as
well,
and
yesterday
the
city
council
unanimously
approved
a
contract
for
managed
health
network
for
employee
assistance,
programs
and
critical
incident,
stress
management
benefits
and
the
mental
health
with
mental
health
services
for
substance
abuse
treatment.
B
These
are
the
tools
we
should
be
exploring
and
aggressively
promoting
simultaneously.
We
should
also
continue
to
keep
an
open
channel
of
communication
with
our
county's
behavioral
health
services
department,
as
well
as
any
potential
partners
in
the
private
sector
on
how
we
can
improve
these
programs.
If
you
can
go
to
the
next
slide,.
B
We
have
seen
in
the
past
several
years
too
many
events
of
mass
victimization
from
the
vta
rail
yard,
shooting
gilroy
garlic
festival
and
even
the
attack
at
grace
baptist
church.
These
incidents
clearly
show
that
we
as
a
city
need
to
be
more
prepared
in
regards
to
providing
the
necessary
resources
and
support
for
those
who
have
experienced
trauma.
B
This
is
a
resource
that
will
be
critical
in
an
emergency
response,
especially
as
we
continue
to
see
mass
victimization
and
traumatic
incidents
occurring
in
our
community.
You
can
go
to
the
next
slide.
B
B
I
believe
we
must
start
a
conversation
with
the
county
on
how
we
can
enact
more
mental
health,
intimate
partner,
violence
and
prevention
and
substance
abuse
measures
to
prevent
individuals
from
harming
themselves
or
others
with
a
gun.
One
of
those
ideas
is
exploring
the
feasibility
of
mental
health
evaluations
as
part
of
our
gun
regulatory
process,
regardless.
What
I'm
asking
for
is
simply
a
conversation
with
our
community
partners,
as
it
is
important
that
we
approach
this
thoughtfully,
transparently
and
inclusively.
B
B
So,
to
summarize,
the
goals
and
expectations
from
this
initiative.
First,
we
want
to
ensure
the
city
of
san
jose
is
indeed
a
positive
place
to
work,
second,
that
our
employees
have
all
the
support
they
need
to
thrive.
Third,
that
we
take
part
in
the
conversations
around
developing
a
county-wide
trauma
recovery
center
and
make
it
part
of
our
emergency
response
infrastructure,
if
possible,
for
that
we
collect
the
data
on
san
jose's,
gun
deaths
and
evaluate
our
city's
firearm
regulatory
programs.
B
B
So
I
just
want
to
close
by
saying
no
policy
change
or
update
is,
is
ever
gonna
bring
back
those
who
have
lost
their
life
to
gun
violence
like
my
own
friend,
michael
rudimekin,
and
the
millions
of
other
people
that
continue
to
grieve
for
their
loved
ones.
B
I
hope
that
what
I
put
forth
is
something
that
is
comprehensive,
community
driven
and
inclusive
of
all
the
issues
that
are
connected
to
gun
violence,
rather
than
just
focusing
on
the
firearms
themselves,
and
with
that
said,
I'd
like
to
move
approval
of
my
memo
and
happy
to
hear
staff's
feedback
on
their
early
response.
Early
consideration.
L
You
do
need
a
motion
still
to
to
move
council
member
paralysis
memo,
even
though
it
is
greenlit.
Yes,
okay,.
M
All
right
again,
all
right:
it's
been
moving
second
hit
councilmember.
P
Davis,
thank
you
vice
mayor.
I
want
to
thank
you
councilmember
prowls,
for,
as
you
said,
trying
to
do
a
comprehensive
look
at
what
leads
to
firearm
violence
and
really
highlighting
the
impact
that
firearms
have
on
suicide.
I
think
that's
a
really
important
topic
to
bring
up
and
one
that
we
haven't
discussed
in
the
past.
I
do
have
a
couple
of
questions.
P
There
was
one
area
that
it
said
that
said
the
city
auditor
needed
to
to
weigh
in
so
I
want
to
give
joe
that
chance
to
weigh
in
about
the
the
audit.
We
looked
at
your
work
plan
when
we
have
approved
your
work
plan
already
joe.
So
I
wanted
to
to
talk
about
that
item.
A
So,
thank
you
councilmember,
so
I
I
did
speak
with
the
the
councilmember
problems
office
about
potential
timing
and
how
to
be
prioritized.
We
have,
as
you
know,
we
have
a
pretty
full
work
plan
right
now,
so
it
probably
wasn't
something
we
could
take
until
toward
the
end
of
the
year,
but
as
I
bring
forward
our
monthly
report
is
this.
P
Okay-
and
I
see
that
lieutenant
donahue
is
on
in
terms
of
the
the
data
that's
being
requested,
I
think
that
would
probably
come
through
pd
and
and
just
to
ensure
that
joe's
team
has
has
the
data
to
do
their.
Their
audit
is
that
data
that
you're
already
collecting.
H
Thank
you
councilman.
First
off
I
I'd
like
to
apologize
for
being
in
a
t-shirt,
I'm
in
training
all
day
and
see
yeah.
Sorry
about
that.
As
far
as
the
data
is
concerned,
there's
some
data
in
in
the
recommendation
that
we
don't
collect
as
an
agency,
but
some
of
it
we
do
so
for
the
city
to
auditor,
we'll
prepare
any
data
that
they
request
that
we
have
available
to
us.
I
do
know
that
the
the
pacific
institute
for
research
and
evaluation
is
doing
a
study.
C
Thank
you
councilmember.
I
I
think
steve
actually
pretty
much
covered
it.
There
is
some
dependencies
here,
because
the
police
department
doesn't
actually
collect
a
lot
of
the
data
points
that
are
being
requested,
but
we're
going
to
work
with
the
auditor's
office
and,
where
needed,
we'll
work
with
the
police
department
to
reach
out
to
the
county.
P
Okay,
thank
you.
I
did
have
a
another
question,
so
the
county's
already
come
up
and
and
in
terms
of
what
you
were
thinking
about
the
trauma
recovery
center.
What
are
your
thoughts
on
what
san
jose's
role
would
be
or
or
any
city's
role
we're?
Not
the
only
city
in
the
county
and
the
county
is
really
driving
that
and-
and
I
personally
believe,
that
the
county's
mandate
to
provide
social
services
that
that
falls
squarely
in
their
court.
So
I'm
wondering
what
your,
what
your
thoughts
are
about,
what
that
role
should
be
council,
member
perlis.
B
Yeah,
thank
you
councilman
davis,
and
it
is
a
brand
new
effort
being
brought
forward
by
the
county
just
approved
a
couple
weeks
ago,
and
what
I
wanted
to
do
was
ensure
that
we
are
getting
involved
very
early
in
that
process,
so
that
we
can
determine
what
is
our
best
fit.
I
would
agree
with
you.
B
It
is,
I
think,
predominantly
a
role
for
the
county,
but
we
know
that
it's
also
a
service
that
is
going
to
benefit
our
our
city
and
the
other
cities
in
the
county,
and
I
don't
think
it
would
be
wise
to
try
and
recreate
the
wheel
if
you
will
in
each
individual
city.
I
do
think
that
we
should
be
able
to
lean
on
the
county
for
this
service
and-
and
I
think,
if
we
can
partner
with
them
now
as
they're
developing
the
program,
then
we
can
determine
where
we
best
fit
into
that.
B
How
we
can
you
know
utilize,
that
as
a
service
and
what
that
partnership
would
look
like.
We
have
services
today,
for
instance,
that
I'm
personally
familiar
with
through
the
police
department,
when
you're
involved
in
a
traumatic
incident
and
support
services
that
you
may
be
able
to
benefit
from
so
we
have
some
of
this,
but
on
a
broader
level
for
all
of
our
city,
employees,
it's
not
as
robust.
Certainly
when
we
have
an
incident
like
this,
that
happens
within
the
jurisdiction
of
the
city,
but
maybe
even
another
partner
agency.
B
P
Well,
I
completely
agree.
I
think
that
more
coordination
with
the
county
is
always
better
and
as
much
as
we
can
can
strengthen
those
relationships
and
forge
those
bonds.
I
completely
support
that.
The
last
question
I
have
is
about
the
the
mental
health
evaluations.
I
didn't
understand
exactly
where
you
were.
P
B
Yeah,
so
there's
actually
some
efforts
happening
in
dc
to
to
try
and
impose
some
mental
health
evaluations
on
individuals
wanting
to
purchase
firearms,
so
I
know
there's
work
going
on
with
that.
I
did
not
want
to
outright
make
that
recommendation.
I
don't
know
enough
about
it
personally.
I
think
that
we
should
explore
at
that
more
similarly
with
other
regulations
that
we
will
put
forward.
B
That's
why
I
I'm
also
asking
that
we
sort
of
audit
that-
and
we
take
a
look
at
some
of
these
regulations
that
we've
already
passed
or
ones
that
we
may
be
passing
over
the
next
several
weeks
or
months,
and
this
one
knowing
that
this
was
coming
forward.
It
is
something
that
intrigued
me
and
that
I
I
was
inclined
to
to
want
to
try
and
find
out
more
about
and
maybe
even
support,
but
without
knowing
enough
about
it.
B
That's
why
I
wanted
to
include
it
here
so
that
that
way,
it's
work
that
we
look
into,
and
ultimately
it
may
be
something
that
we
do
bring
forward
as
a
another
regulation
on
the
purchasing
of
firearms,
but
for
now
it
was
about
exploring
that.
So
that
way
we
can
learn
more.
P
B
Yeah,
and-
and
the
first
thing
too
was
one
of
the
things
that
we've
learned
is
that
it
it's
not
something
that,
even
if
we
were
to
let's
say,
impose
a
law
like
this
or
if
the
federal
government
was
to
what
we've
come
to
understand
is
that
within
our
mental
health
profession,
that
that
those
professionals
aren't
necessarily
trained
for
something
like
that,
that's
not
something
that
that
they
would
readily
be
able
to
take
on,
and
so
that's
why
we're
asking
to
determine
the
feasibility
of
such
an
effort
again,
knowing
that
there's
already
advocacy
for
it
at
the
federal
level,
there
may
be
some,
as
we
all
know,
there
may
be
some
laws
being
passed,
the
federal
or
state
level.
B
There's
a
lot
of
discussions
of
new
restrictions
at
the
state
level
that
we
may
just
have
imposed
on
us,
and
so
whether
we
we
necessarily
agree
with
them
or
not.
This
is
one
of
those
that's
been
brought
to
my
attention
and
so
really
understanding
the
feasibility
of
it
with
the
professional
network.
We
have
is
what
the
first
question
that
I'm
asking
I'm
not
advocating
at
the
moment
that
this
be
something
that
we
do.
P
Okay,
that's
that's
great
to
hear
because
we
don't,
as
a
city,
employ
mental
health
professionals.
That's
not
something
that
we
that
we
have
and
again
that's
one
of
those
areas
where
behavioral
health
is
is
under
the
purview
of
the
county.
So
that's
where
I
was.
I
had
a
question
in.
B
P
Right
yeah,
I
totally
agree
if
we
I
and
I'd
like
to
actually
go
so
far
so
say
if
we
can't
have
a
joint
study
session
about
this.
I
don't
really
see
the
purpose
honestly
of
having
a
study
session
on
our
own
about
about
these
kinds
of
topics,
because
there
are
so
many
that
you
listed
that
really
require
our
county
partners
to
to
be
part
of
that
conversation
and
really
to
tell
us
what
resources
they've
already
dedicated
or
that
they're
going
to
be
dedicating
to
these
to
these
initiatives.
P
P
It's
so
important
to
talk
about
that
mental
health
aspect,
and
I
know
that
you
and
your
family
have
have
struggled
with
the
the
grief
of
you
know,
losing
your
your
close
friend
and
in
in
addition
to
being
a
city
leader
at
this
time
during
during
the
mass
shooting.
I
just
my
heart
goes
out
to
you
and
I
really
I
admire
you
for
for
taking
this
on
as
a
as
a
policy
initiative
when
you're
when
you're
still
hurting.
So.
Thank
you.
K
Thank
you
chair.
I
I
also
will
start
off
by
thanking
you,
councilmember
perales.
I
know
that
this
is
personal
to
you
as
most
of
us
who
are
involved
in
public
service,
we're
we're
really
inspired
by
things
that
happen
in
our
lives,
and
so
I
know
that
this
comes
from
a
genuine
place
in
in
your
life
and
and
and
the
reason
to
do
so
is
the
right
reason
and
I'll
share.
K
I
think
I've
shared
before
when
I
was
19,
I
I
lost
a
friend
to
intimate
partner
violence
and
she
was
killed
by
her
boyfriend
and
it
really
changes
the
way
that
you
date
right,
especially
at
a
very
early,
oh
well,
early
dating
age,
and
so
that's
one
of
the
reasons
why
I
am
very
focused
on
sexual
assault
and
and
gender-based
violence,
and
I
know
that
you've
been
very
supportive
and
I'm
really
grateful
for
that,
and
so
I
know
it
comes
to
no
surprise
to
me
that
that
you
would
put
this
plan
forward.
K
K
I
had
requested
some
updates
on
or
so
duty
manual
changes
on,
physical
abuse
for
children,
investigation
of
sex
crimes,
human
trafficking
and
domestic
violence,
and
one
of
the
things
that
that
is
important
is
that
we
start
integrating
some
of
the
changes
that
we're
making
as
a
society
as
a
culture
integrating
them
into
the
way
into
formally,
so
that
we
can
then
have
a
policy
around
it.
K
On
lessons
learned
and
and
I've
got
to
say,
you
know,
I've
got
to
thank
lieutenant,
donahue
and
and
of
course,
our
our
chief
and
captain
jimenez
for
for
their
great
work
on
gender-based
violence
and
some
of
the
changes
that
they've
had
to
make
and
and
standard
operating
procedures
that
they've
had
to
develop
because
they
took
a
moment
from
their
work
and
realized
that
this
these
pieces
were
missing.
And
so
I
think
that
this
is.
This
is
really
in
line
with
that
kind
of
thinking
and
the
efforts
that
I'm
making
in
that.
K
Sometimes
we
we're
just
doing
we're
just
responding
to
emergencies
and
we
have
to
take
a
moment
to
say
how
do
we
align
the
efforts
that
we
need
to
as
policymakers
with
what
is
happening
in
our
culture
and
in
our
community,
and
I
think
this
is
an
excellent
plan.
I
look
forward
to
seeing
how
we
can
cross-reference
some
of
these
things,
especially
around,
of
course,
the
intimate
partner
violence.
K
I
know
that
councilmember
carrasco
has
been
working
on
this
since
she
started
her
term
and
that's
her
area
of
of
specialty
and
in
terms
of
leadership,
and
I
advocate
for
a
sexual
assault,
because
I
was
kind
of
left
out,
but
those
two
things
as
we
know
intersect
quite
a
bit
and
the
other
thing
that
intersects
is
these
perpetrators
in
the
interacting
with
the
law.
K
And
if
you
know
you,
you
cited
a
couple
of
incidents
that
have
happened
here
in
san
jose
and
of
those
incidents.
There
was
a
history
of
intimate
partner.
Violence
from
those
perpetrators
and
research
has
already
been
established
that
that
kind
of
crime
is
very
indicative
of
of,
if
not
to
say
that
it's
a
the
first
step
towards
more
aggravated
crimes.
K
I'm
you
know,
I
don't
know,
I'm
not
an
expert,
but
I
know
I've
read
enough
to
to
know
that
this
can
lead
and-
and
we
know
from
last
week
that
aggravated
assaults
have
gone
up,
that
rape
has
gone
up.
All
of
the
violent
crimes
in
our
city
have
gone
up
last
from
last
year
in
comparison
to
2019,
and
so
we
can't
just
acknowledge
these
things.
We
have
to
do
something
about
it
and
I'm
really
grateful
that
you
have
this
action
plan.
K
One
of
the
things
I'm
I'm
wondering,
if
maybe
this
is
something
we
could
discuss
with
the
with
the
gosh.
Where
is
the
rfq?
K
This
is
the
rfq
is
to
do
an
organization-wide
culture
and
climate
evaluation,
and
that
is
typically
just
for
our
employees.
Correct.
B
Yeah,
that's
more
in
internal
looking
just
just
within
our
workplace
here
in
in
the
city
of
san
jose,
which
I
believe
the
staff's
early
consideration
form
addressed.
K
And,
and
so
on,
your
item
number
four:
you
have
a
report
from
our
police
department
on
causes
of
fire,
firearm
related
deaths
and
injuries,
including
suicides,
and
I
would
love
if
you
could
include
gender-based
or
intimate
partner
violence
in
relation
to
some
of
those
firearm
related
deaths.
K
K
And
we
we
really
need
to
start
looking
at
how
serious
rape
and
sexual
assault
is
and
that
this
is
the.
This
is
a
place
to
really
intervene,
and
so
I
I'd
love
for
us
to
cross-reference
our
work
plan.
K
Our
gender-based
work
plan
that
we
have
under
under
public
safety,
strategic
committee
and
then
this
plan
to
see
if
there's
any
places
that
we
can
work
together
around
there's
no
sense
in
us
doing
some
of
the
you
know
peripherally
we're
doing
something
similar,
but
I
think
we
need
to
connect
violence
with
intimate
partner
violence
because
there's
an
absolute
correlation
there
and
I'm
glad
you're,
you're
you're
heading
this
up.
K
But
the
the
last
thing
I'll
just
say
is
that
I
was
in
a
meeting
with
east
union
high
school
district
and
high
school
in
my
district,
because
there
was,
you
know,
there's
a
uptick
in
violence
around
all
of
our
high
schools,
and
you
know
with
no
surprise
in
terms
of
we
knew
that
there
was
a
lot
of
bottled
up
feelings
for
our
youth.
K
A
lot
of
folks
feeling
isolated
a
lot
of
kiddos
feeling
isolated,
including
my
own
children
and
and
with
good
reason
because
of
this
pandemic,
but
that
also
has
a
social
reaction
right.
We're
we're
we're
also
going
to
pay
for
that
sacrifice
that
we
all
made
in
terms
of
staying
away
from
one
another,
and
I
hope
that
we
can
also
move
into
youth
related
violence
as
well.
K
I
know
that,
speaking
to
some
some
of
the
school
liaisons
they-
and
it
was
it-
I
was
talking
to
one
of
our
police
officers-
who's
a
school
liaison,
and
he
said
you
know
that
he
foresaw
this
was
before
school
started,
that
there
was
going
to
be
an
increase
in
in
violence
and-
and
he
was
absolutely
right-
I
hate
that
he
was
right,
but
but
I
understand
why-
and
so
I
think
that
that
if
you
could
include
our
youth
somehow
in
your
plan,
so
that
it
could
be
very
specific,
it's
different
to
to
relate
and
target
youth
than
it
is
to
target
women,
then
to
target
adults
and
to
try
our
different
subgroups
in
within
our
community.
B
And,
and
if
I
may
share,
could
I
respond?
Yes
go
ahead
yeah,
so
I
and
I
appreciate
that
I
think
obviously
there's
a
narrow
focus
here
on
firearm
related
violence,
but
you
know,
as
as
you
have
been
beating
the
drum
and
and
bring
up
really
good
points
on
where
we
find
the
the
cross
section
of
intimate
partner,
violence
and
and
and
then
and
then,
ultimately,
you
know
a
number
of
those
people
being
the
same
people
that
are
committing
gun
violence.
B
I
do
think
that's
important
to
see
where
that
crossover
is
and
maybe
how
frequent
it
is.
As
we
know,
I
think
we've
had
some
preliminary
data
through
our
conversations
before.
B
I
think
we
won't
be
surprised
to
see
a
high
correlation
of
individuals
committing
gun
violence
that
also
have
histories
of
intimate
partner,
violence
and
then,
similarly,
where
we
have
some
youth,
I
think,
obviously
being
able
to
break
down
the
demographics
of
age
should
be
something
that
the
police
department
is
capable
of
doing
as
they
generate
the
report.
But
I'll
ask
that
to
lieutenant
donahue.
B
It
may
take
more
time
and
look,
I'm
not
against,
obviously
being
able
to
to
allow
the
time
necessary
to
come
back
with
the
the
information
that
is
going
to
be
most
helpful
to
us,
but
hear
from
you
lieutenant
donahue
how?
How
would
that
look
as
far
as
if
you
were
to
this
recommendation
for
from
my
memo,
if
you
were
to
also
then
try
to
incorporate
intimate
partner
violence
for
these
individuals,
that
are,
you
know
that
we
get
some
data
on
on
firearm
related
death
and
injuries?
B
H
Sure,
thank
you
councilmember
a
clarifying
question.
If
you
will,
when
we
talk
about
recommendation
four,
I
thought
it
was
more
along
the
lines
of
suicide
and
gun
violence
like
self-harm
suicide,
or
were
you
looking
more
along
the
lines
of
gun
violence
like
gang-related,
gun,
violence
and
and
assault
with
a
deadly
weapon
kind
of
thing.
B
So
it
was,
it
was
actually
all
firearm-related
deaths
and
injuries,
and
then
I
said
including
suicides
in
san
jose.
So
but
but
really
I
mean,
I
didn't
even
have
to
say
included,
the
idea
was
all
firearm-related
deaths
and
injuries.
We
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
did
include
suicides.
That
was
not
necessarily
just
you
know:
firearm
related
injuries
to
others.
It
was
also
firearm,
related
death
or
injuries
to
to
oneself.
B
H
If
we,
if
we
look
at
it
that
way,
it
would
be
the
same
kind
of
data.
We
could
just
extrapolate
out
whether
or
not
that
person
there
was
a
ipv
related
incident
as
far
as
doing
criminal
histories
on
subjects.
That
would
take
a
lot
longer
to
determine
whether
or
not
they
have
a
history
of
ipv
with
if
they're,
if
it
wasn't
involved
in
that
particular
incident,
because
we'd
have
to
look
it
up
subject
by
subject,
but
it's
not
that
it
can't
be
done.
It's
just
going
to
take
a
little
more
time.
B
Okay,
so
easy
enough
to
connect
it
to
if
that
actual
incident
of
firearm,
injury
or
death
was
related
to
ipv,
but
not
necessarily
as
easy
to
then
determine
say,
for
instance,
somebody
that
committed
suicide
did
they
also
have
a
history
of
you
know
intimate
partner
violence.
I
would
be
interested,
I
recognize
it
would
take
more
time.
B
I'd
be
interested,
especially
if
we
can
come
back
to
to
piss
fizz,
with
some
preliminary
results
on
something
that
was
a
little
bit
more
easier
data
to
gather
and
then
what
what
I
think
we
can
do
and
customer
dennis
tell
me
if
you
think
that
this
would
would
suffice
at
pizzfizz.
We
can
then
give
the
further
direction
to
then
dive
down
a
little
deeper,
and
maybe
we
can
start
with
the
last
year
versus
the
last
five
years
right.
B
So
then,
that
way
you
can
look
at
individual
suspect
data
from
from
just
a
year,
and
maybe
you
can
return
that
personal
history
on
those
subjects
quicker,
because
I
do
think
we
will
see
some
alarming
corollaries
and
I
I
think
that
would
be
helpful
information.
Would
that
be
acceptable.
Counselor
dennis.
K
Yeah,
so
that
would
be
acceptable
as
long
as
we
change
our
work
plan
somehow
to
incorporate
it
formally
and-
and
we
don't
forget
it-
I
absolutely
open
thank
you
for
for
your
consideration.
B
Yeah
and
I'm
happy
to
include
it
in
this
motion
that
I've
made
where,
on
this
item
number
four,
that
we
are
actually
specifically
calling
out
the
that
we
want
the
data
also
to
show
the
correlation
between
intimate
partner
violence.
And
then
I
think,
just
for
your
my
purpose
that
we'll
do
our
part
when
it
comes
to
phys
to
then
dive
down
a
little
deeper
because
of
what
lieutenant
donahue
just
said,
that
it
may
take
a
little
bit
more
time.
K
C
Hey,
thank
you
so
much
councilmember,
so
I
just
want
to
clarify
to
make
sure
that
we're
clear
from
the
staffing
side
what
we're
able
to
do
and
and
steve,
please
jump
in
if
I'm
characterizing
this
incorrectly.
C
When
we
greenlit
this
particular
item,
we
were
very
much
thinking
that
we
would
work
off
of
one
the
auditor's
report
and
to
the
existing
report,
that's
being
done
by
the
the
third
party.
We
weren't
thinking
we're
going
to
try
and
compile
a
third
body
of
work,
because
a
lot
of
the
the
data
sets
are
going
to
be
the
same.
So
I
wanted
to
clarify
that
he
said
we
were
very
much
going
to
work
off
of
the
existing
research
projects.
H
Yes,
actually,
if
you
give
me
just
a
sec
I'll,
speak
on
that
councilmember
paralyzed
you'll,
probably
remember
this
the
when
we
take
a
an
incident
report
and
say,
for
example,
it's
a
suicide
by
firearm
and
we
believe
it
to
be
that
thing.
We
don't
actually
identify
it
as
that
the
cause
of
death
is
identified
by
the
county
when
the
coroner
and
does
the
investigation.
Therefore,
they
actually
have
the
record
of
what
deaths
by
firearm
occurred
and
we
just
have
an
unattended
death
or
something
to
that
effect.
H
So,
to
obtain
that
particular
information
on
firearm
violence
from
deaths
by
firearm,
it
would
have
to
actually
come
from
a
county,
and
then
we
could,
we
could
articulate,
say
an
assault
with
a
deadly
weapon
with
a
firearm
or
something
like
that
where
a
firearm
was
used
in
the
commission
of
the
crime,
but
because
we
can
track
that
in
our
reports.
H
It's
just
the
final
result
of
firearm
deaths
are
the
issue
and
to
speak
on
sarah's
point
about
the
the
third
report
it
might
be
redundant
at
this
point
until
we
have
the
data
compiled
by
the
auditor
and
the
prior
report
to
do
that.
Third,
one:
that's
why
we're
asking
to
to
stand
by
on
that
for
a
little
bit
until
we
figure
out
exactly
what's
going
to
be
reported
back
in
the
mayor's
report,.
C
Thank
you
for
that.
So
so
thank
you
for
adding
to
that,
because
I
just
want
to
make
sure
it
was
clear
that
we
are
very
much
at
the
mercy
of
the
county
and
the
medical
examiner
to
get
a
lot
of
these
data
sets,
and
I
don't
know
the
format
in
which
they
collect
the
information,
how
it
can
be
disaggregated,
and
I
would
hate
for
this
body
to
get
you
know
to
think
that
we
were
able
to
to
do
certain
things
with
the
data
sets
that
we
aren't
able
to
do
so.
It
we'll
certainly
explore.
C
B
I
think
that
to
make
it,
maybe
a
little
bit
easier
too,
would
be
the
first
item
we
agendized
at
pizzfizz
could
be
the
feasibility
of
this
recommendation
for
so
so
then
that
way
you
you
come
back
and
actually
let
us
know
in
committee,
you
know
what
you
found
out,
how
difficult
it
was
to
gather
that
data
from
the
county,
coroner
and
and
and
that'll
give
us
an
opportunity
again.
I'm
not
trying
to
you
know
push
this
in
front
of
other
work.
The
idea
was-
and
yes
that's
what
we
mentioned
about.
B
You
know
working
after
that
audit
right
and
not
being
redundant
in
the
data.
I
still
would
like
to
ensure
that
once
we
do
get
this
data,
that
it
does
incorporate
what
councilman
dennis
is
talking
about,
but
but
I'm
not
saying
that
this
needs
to
you
know,
come
back
as
a
third
report
stand
alone.
You
know
in
two
months
to
piss
fizz.
B
I
recognize
that
there's
other
challenges
there
and
that
I
think
the
first
thing
we
can
do
is
is
maybe
as
you,
if,
if
staff
lieutenant
donald,
you
can
come
back
to
phys
with
the
feasibility
of
this.
This
recommendation
for
on
how
difficult
it
was
to
gather
that
data.
You
know,
I
think
we
should
be
able
to
do
it,
and
I
think
you
would
agree
it's
just
a
matter
of
what.
What
does
that
challenge?
Look
like,
since
it's
not
the
data
that
we
own.
M
All
right,
councilmember,
maria
you
said
your
hand
up.
K
He
raised
it
again,
chair,
okay,
and
the
reason
I
raised
it
is
that
there
is
in
the
works,
is
a
sexual
assault,
joint
meeting
in
november
and
council
member.
K
I
think
if
it
works
out
for
everyone-
and
it
actually
is
placed
on
the
schedule
that
this
could
be
an
another
opportunity
for
us
to
ask
for
that
data
from
the
county
as
something
that
would
be
important
for
us
to
continue
to
have
on
an
ongoing
basis.
But
you
know
you
as
a
chair,
can
you
know
we
can
figure
out
how
that
looks
on
the
agenda?
K
B
Yeah,
I
think-
and
I
just
got
a
message
as
well-
that
it
was
something
the
county
supervisors
recently
requested
was
that
the
coroner
make
public
and
release
their
reports,
and
they
had,
I
guess
they
requested,
because
they
wanted
to
know
for
covert
related
deaths,
fentanyl-related
deaths,
but
the
reports
included
all
deaths.
It
would
so
that
that
data-
I
guess,
has
now
been
made
public.
So
maybe
a
little
bit
easier
to
you
know
to
go
in
and
find
than
we
think.
M
Great
thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
I
also
agree
that
councilmember
perales.
I
know
that
your
proposal
is
heartfelt
and
genuine,
and
not
political
and
there's
no
doubt
in
my
mind
that
that's
the
case-
and
I
also
wanted
to
comment
on
how
it's
very
heartening
to
see
proposals
that
are
going
to
prevent
some
of
these
tragedies
from
happening
and
I'm
not
a
either
or
person,
I'm
an
person.
M
So
I
believe
that
our
prior
gun
harm
reduction
direction
and
proposals
are
needed,
and
I
believe
that
your
proposals
that
you're
putting
out
right
now
are
needed,
and
so
you
know
we
should
pursue
an
end
strategy
to
try
to
reduce
gum,
gun
violence
and
gun
harm.
So
on
that
note
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second,
so
tony.
C
M
M
A
A
A
A
Then
he
adds
a
disingenuous
sentence
that,
of
course
he
didn't
really
mean
the
plan
that
he
has
just
proposed.
As
many
of
you
know,
I've
been
involved
in
local
government
in
san
jose
for
over
40
years.
I've
never
seen
a
proposal
so
steeped
in
malice
as
this
one,
it
should
be
rejected
by
every
member
of
the
rules.
Committee
with
the
contempt
that
it
deserves,
there
should
be
no
ghettos
planned
in
san
jose.
Thank
you.
M
Thank
you,
robert
tessa,.
G
Okay,
you
hear
me
okay,
good
well,
thank
you,
robert
brownstein,
and
I
got
to
see
who
it
was
because
he
had
his
name
up
in
the
and
also
the
what
was
it
called
the
well.
The
the
transcript
was
there,
which
it
wasn't
there
at
city
council
meeting,
and
so
thank
you
for
that,
and
thank
you,
robert
for
your
your
thoughts
and
basically
you
know
the
the
issue
that
I
see
in
terms
of
public
lands
is
a
lot
of
the
redevelopment.
G
Land
has
been,
you
know,
financialized
by
our
city,
and
this
keeps
going
on.
I
mean
it's
the
same
thing
about
your
your
general
plan
to
make
jobs
as
a
priority
and
what's
happening
now
is
changing
so
much.
We
have
crises
that
we
have
to
address
and
jobs
actually
is
is
on
the
bottom.
We
really
need
to
get
universal
basic
income
as
we
go
forward
and
create
these
housing
models
that
I
I've
been
suggesting
that
that
you
know
do
deal
with.
G
You
know,
that's
gonna
have
to
stop,
so
we
have
to
create
those
type
of
housing
models
where
we
do
grow
food,
and
so
that's
where
you
know
also
I've
been
saying
is
that
we
we
need
to
not
be
dealing
with.
You
know
any
kind
of
office
buildings,
hotels,
anything
that
excuse
me
that
deals
with
fossil
fuels.
We
need
to
be
focusing
on
our
crises,
which
is
housing
and
our
climate.
H
Yeah
good
afternoon,
and
thanks
for
the
time
my
name
is
bill
dowling
I
actually
represent
ups.
We
have
our
facility
over
there
on
south
7th
street.
Just
a
couple
blocks
away
from
the
fairgrounds
in
san
jose.
Ups
has
800
employees
that
are
domiciled
at
that
facility
and
we
service
over
50
000
customers
in
san
jose
daily.
H
H
H
H
So
we
respectfully
ask
that
the
council
consider
rejecting
that
proposal.
I'd
also
like
to
ask
within
district
10
the
councilman
who
proposed
this,
how
many
housing
units
are
are
there
in
his
district?
Q
Good
afternoon,
members
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
oscar
castro,
associate
director
of
housing
and
transportation
policy
working
partnerships
here
to
provide
comment
on
this
matter.
We
all
recognize
the
gravity
of
the
homelessness
crisis
taking
place
throughout
san
jose
and
the
region
in
general.
Further
work
at
all
levels
will
be
necessary
in
order
to
craft
comprehensive
solutions
for
unhoused
populations.
Q
We
would
like
to
point
towards
existing
efforts,
such
as
the
community
plan
to
end
homelessness,
which
provides
a
multifaceted
approach
from
policy
to
services
all
aimed
at
creating
permanent
solutions
for
homeless
individuals
and
families.
Therein
lies
several
opportunities
to
support
efforts
towards
creating
permanent
solutions.
Q
In
addition,
we
like
to
mention
that
temporary
housing
solutions,
while
important,
are
in
fact
just
that
much
needed
resources
from
the
state
level
down
could
be
geared
towards
housing,
entries
for
homeless
individuals
and
those
those
should
be
dispersed
towards
various
initiatives,
but
with
an
emphasis
on
creating
permanent
housing
solutions
to
provide
houses
residents
a
home,
long
term.
Furthermore,
we
would
like
to
note
that
there
have
been
numerous
instances
of
temporary
housing
initiatives
or
wage
that
violations
have
taken
place
for
those
workers
that
are
working
on
building
these
projects.
Q
M
Thank
you,
lisa.
N
Hi,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
I
want
to
respond
to
once
to
bill.
Dowling
district
10
has
no
no.
They
have
zero,
assisted
housing
and
low
income
housing.
So
it's
kind
of
preposterous
that
this
proposal
is
coming
from
somebody
from
a
very
wealthy
area,
which
has
put
absolutely
no
weight
on
resulting
the
issue
of
homeless
homelessness
in
in
the
city
of
san
jose.
I
send
also
my
comments
via
email,
but
I'm
gonna
read,
I'm
I'm
I'm
I
leave
within
one
mile
of
the
of
the
fairgrounds.
N
I
am
impacted
by
the
amount
of
homeless
that
are
trespassing
on
our
own,
our
on
our
backyards
and
that
are
actually
on
the
on
a
monterey
road
and
we
do
realize
that
we
all
have
to
everybody
has
to
hold
our
to
hold
some
sort
of
a
district
distributed
weight
on
this
to
try
to
address
this
solution.
But,
however,
the
proposal
appears
to
just
put
all
the
weight
on
the
district:
seven
community.
N
We
then
one
mile
of
one
mile
and
a
half
of
the
fairgrounds
there's
multiple
low-income
apartment
buildings,
there's
more
than
just
multiple
assisted
income
communities,
and
they
are
our
police
and
our
fire
department
are
the
most
active
also
within
those
several
couple
blocks.
N
So
basically,
what
they're
saying
is
like
robert
mentioned
at
the
top,
is
creating
a
gato
and
putting
six
thousand
homeless
people
within
a
mile
from
my
home,
and
this
is
not
only
going
to
impact
the
safety
and
security
of
the
people
that
have
their
homes
and
mortgages
here,
but
it's
also
going
to
drain
the
resources
that
we
have
for
police
and
safety
and
security,
and
it's
also
creating
an
unfair,
an
unknown
first
quote:
code
ghetto
notoriously
this
district
seven
is
also
low,
lower
income
and
more
diverse
and
with
people
of
color
than
the
other
than
the
the
the
councils
that
are
proposing
this.
N
I
I
I
We
have
bus
stops
that
stop
in
the
morning
for
schools
that
are
in
plain
sight
of
the
homeless,
people
that
are
living
there
right
now,
there's
species
on
the
street
and
then
after
you
drive
down
there.
I
want
you
to
answer
yourself,
a
question:
are
you?
Okay,
with
your
children,
walking
down
the
street,
your
grandparents
walking
down
the
street
or
you
being
a
resident
rocking
down
these
streets?
I
Because,
right
now
we
have
people
that
walk
in
the
middle
of
the
street
to
avoid
walking
down
the
sidewalk
because
of
the
people
that
are
camped
out
on
the
sidewalk
currently,
and
these
people
are
all
walking
around
with
large
sticks,
bats
and
everything
else
to
protect
themselves.
I
myself
have
been
threatened
twice
by
these
homeless
people
and
again
somebody
else
mentioned
about
the
police
and
the
underserving
of
our
district.
I
Already,
the
police
can't
even
get
out
here
to
respond
to
a
call
after
I've
been
threatened
to
be
pit
for
sprayed
by
somebody
who's
living
in
a
car
within
you
know
two
to
three
hours
and
by
the
time
they
show
up
the
people
are
gone,
and
then
they
come
back
later
because
they
know
the
routine
as
long
as
they're,
not
there,
nothing
will
happen
and
the
police
always
say
that
there's
only
four
or
five
officers
in
the
area
at
any
given
time.
I
So
I
think
this
committee
should
also
deny
this
outright
and
tell
council
remember
mayhem.
You
know,
ask
him
how
many
homeless
units
are
currently
in
district
10
and
ask
him
a
place
one
in
his
own
district,
rather
than
further
stretching
our
resources
and
in
our
own
area
and
again
it's
creating
an
unsafe
environment,
as
we
speak
right
now
on
umbarga
road
in
between
center
and
monterey,
road.
M
Thank
you.
The
person
with
the
number
ending
zero
four
five,
seven.
I
I
I
know
for
a
fact:
our
employer
has
a
lot
of
probably
close
to
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
a
year,
just
in
combating
the
homelessness
in
the
areas
of
his
property
that
he
owns
and,
of
course,
every
time
there
is
a
situation
we
have
to
rely
on
the
city
to
help
us,
while
we
use
the
resources
that
are
available
to
us
either
as
homeless
cares
concerns
whether
it's
illegal
dumping
getting
picked
up
the
graffiti
threats
from
some
of
the
homeless
people,
water
theft
that
are
stealing
from
some
of
our
fire
fire
sprinkler
systems.
I
F
Hi
blair
beekman
here
you
know
the
issue
comes
up
all
the
time.
Do
we
bring?
How
can
we
make
the
fairgrounds
into
some
sort
of
homeless
encampment?
F
You
know
like
with
what
the
situation
at
columbus
park
and
and
and
that
area
being
turned
into
an
soccer
fields.
Eventually,
you
know
the
airplanes
that
go
overhead.
They
they
dump
tons
of
fuel
and
and
fuel
exhaust
around
there,
making
it
a
very
dangerous
place
to
to
be
continuously
living
the
same
with
the
fairgrounds
that
you
know
because
of
all
the
animals
over
all
the
years,
there's
microbes
in
the
ground.
F
That
is
not
really
talked
about
very
much,
but
we
should
talk
about
that
can
be
a
very
serious
issue
in
the
rainy
season,
especially
that
I
think
just
continuously
makes
the
fairgrounds
not
a
way
that
we
can
work
for
future
homeless
issues
and
as
much
as
we
want
to,
and
it's
a
good
idea
and-
and
I
hope
the
government
you
know,
government
sponsorship
of
local
encampments,
small
encampments
around
the
city
is
still
going
well.
F
I
thank
you
for
the
efforts
of
the
trailer
park
issue
in
in
district
four,
but
the
arsenic
issues
does
bring
up
the
same
sort
of
questions
that
we
have
to
have
good
land
prepared
for
people
to
live
on.
We
can't
just
dump
them
every
anywhere
and
I
hope
you're
working
on
that
district
4
issue,
possibly
as
needed.
F
I've
got
21
seconds
left
here.
Just
thank
you
for
good
intentions,
but
we
have
to.
We
have
to
really
you
know,
respect
things
and
good
luck.
How
we
can
do
that.
Thank
you.
M
If
todd's
not
ready,
let's
put
todd.
O
Go
ahead,
I'm
amazed
at
the
comments
I'm
hearing
in
this
session.
I'm
an
advocate
for
the
unhoused,
I'm
also
a
small
business
owner.
It
doesn't
matter
where
the
challenge,
what
district
the
challenge
exists?
What
matters
is
which
district
the
solution
can
create
all
the
issues
I've
heard
today
about
crime
and
the
ghetto
and
the
the
land
issues
and
the
micro
organisms
and
so
forth.
O
All
these
issues
are
going
to
be
drastically
curtailed
and
minimized,
because
you
have
such
a
large
encampment
of
homes,
tiny
homes
where
you
have
now,
you
have
unhoused
you
have
you
have
the
issues
of
crime,
you
have
the
issues
of
waste
and
they're
scattered
around.
O
We
need
one
large
venue
where
we
can
keep
put
all
these
individuals
together
and
we
provide
services
for
them
and
the
the
police
would
be
much
more
apt
to
find
the
issues
that
need
to
get
resolved
in
one
large
one,
larger
venue,
the
same
with
the
social
services,
the
same
with
all
the
different
services
that
can
be
provided
to
a
larger
group.
The
larger
venue,
the
better
it
becomes
more
synergistic,
becomes
drastically
more
efficient
right
now.
There's
drastic
waste
inefficiency,
lack
of
synergism.
O
O
What
kind
of
society
are
we
that
we
cannot
take
care
of
our
our
friends
and
neighbors,
and
they?
If
you
get
to
know
these
people,
you
will
have
a
lot
of
friends
and
neighbors
out
there
that
are
unhoused,
please
get
involved.
Please
support
this
initiative.
Finally,
somebody
is
taking
the
stand
and
doing
the
right
thing.
C
Hi
good
afternoon
I
live
in
district,
seven,
so
about
council
member
mayhem
has
proposed
on
feasibility
of
quick
bid,
build
housing
site
at
san
clara
county
fairgrounds.
I
don't
think
it's
that
simple.
C
We
should
not
be
considering
the
fairgrounds
or
any
other
location
without
first
addressing
the
different
homeless
categories,
that
the
proposal
is
looking
to
house
a
plan
for
execution,
monitoring
and
asset
strategy
and
shutdown
you
can
just
throw
you
can't
just
throw
a
blanket
over
the
solution
forget
about
it
and
we
all
know
how
that
works.
It
starts
off
great,
then
funded
over
time
goes
away,
and
you
have
essentially
created
a
residential
boundary
of
impoverished
human
beings,
similar
to
the
emerging
of
black
ghettos
in
new
york
city
in
chicago
that
didn't
go
well.
C
The
filipinos
in
brazil,
of
course,
after
the
war
slums
in
india,
and
we
could
go
on,
there's
probably
a
lot
of
white
papers
that
discussed
this
at
length.
Concentration,
the
most
marginalized,
did
not
solve
the
problem
then,
and
it
only
propagated
the
vicious
generational
homelessness
cycle
that
became
too
large
for
anyone
to
address.
C
You
know
that
not
all
homeless
will
benefit
from
the
proposed
model.
Everyone's
story
is
different
and
one
was
in
different
execution
plan
showing
all
the
homelessness
of
san
jose
in
one
concentrated
area
is
not
the
solution.
It's
like
the
basical
approach.
It
does
not
solve
the
problem.
It
only
shifts
and
grows
the
problem.
What
solves
the
problem
are
getting
people
into
programs,
relocation,
new
beginnings,
so
they
can
benefit
and
graduate
from
government
subsidized
housing
eventually,
because
this
is
not
the
long-term
solution.
C
C
We
should
focus
on
preventing
these
from
entering
a
homeless
vortex,
because
once
they
enter
it's
hard
to
get
out
needs
to
say
I'm
not
in
favor
of
the
proposed
without
well
thought
out
plan.
Please
consider
that
this
is
something
out
of
hunger
games.
Okay,.
A
All
right
perfect,
so
my
name
is
corey
condren,
I'm
a
firefighter,
and
I'm
here
representing
local
230..
We
have
some
concerns
about
the
proposal
from
councilmember,
mahan,
specifically
ones
that
will
impact
district
lincoln
for
the
san
jose
police
department
and
station
26
for
the
san
jose
fire
department.
A
While
we
recognize
that
the
unhoused
are
one
of
our
most
vulnerable
populations
here
in
the
city,
we
do
think
that
having
all
of
them
congregate
in
one
specific
area,
especially
one
that's
already
20
percent
busier
than
any
other
police
district
or
fire
house
in
the
entire
city,
just
might
not
be
the
best
option.
A
Already.
You
know
station
26,
one
of
the
busiest
fire
engines
in
the
country
that
completely
covers
all
of
district
seven
and
adding
to
them
having
more
unhoused
more
people
that
traditionally
call
911.
A
Typically
more
than
the
the
average
citizen,
doesn't
necessarily
help
the
situation
of
trying
to
control
the
911
calls.
Currently,
our
response
times
in
that
area
can
be
impacted
due
to
the
already
homeless
population
that
exists
in
district
7.
as
well.
As
you
know,
lincoln
for
the
for
the
police
officers.
I
know
I
heard
concerns
earlier
about
crime
in
the
area
and
we
have
concerns
that
adding
more
pop
home
house
population
to
that
district.
A
It
just
is
going
to
create
more
of
a
problem.
So
we
really
like
you
guys
just
take
the
consideration
that
you
know
having
the
busiest
area
of
the
city
and
then
adding
more
in-house
might
not
fix
the
problem
and
we'll
put
much
more
fiscal
and
response
time
impact
to
the
police,
department,
police
department
and
the
fire
department.
Thank
you.
So
much.
D
D
However,
the
location
I
mean
this
needs
these
locations
that
are
far
from
everything
else
in
the
city.
Let's
say
downtown,
I
mean
so
say:
you're,
you're,
unhoused
and
you're,
saying
and
you're
staying
there
say
there
was
a
place
to
stay
at
the
fairgrounds
you're
trying
to
get
on
your
feet,
you're
trying
to
get
work.
You
know
you
need
to
be
able
to
get
to
the
rest
of
the
world.
You
need
to
be
able
to
get
to
interviews
to
downtown.
D
D
Is
it
just
people,
don't
just
wake
up
and
they're
unhoused
for
no
reason
there
are
causes
of
this?
The
causes
is
poverty,
lack
of
housing,
obviously,
but
you
know
like
say
the
minimum
wage
being
extremely
low.
That's
one
cause
lack
of
any
decent
public
transportation.
That's
another
cause!
You
know
your
policies
encourage
people
to
own
cars
and
cars
are
not
affordable
for
a
huge
segment
of
the
population.
D
So
all
of
these
things
are
connected
and
the
high
cost
of
living
drives
people
to
be
unhoused.
So
please
think
about
how
you
can
invest,
in
other
things
like
public
transit
and
the
ability
to
walk
and
bicycle
safely
on
the
streets
as
a
way
to
address
unhausedness
and
lots
of
other
problems.
We
have
including
catastrophic
climate
change.
Thank
you.
S
There
we
go
the
unmute
button
just
popped
up
there
good
afternoon,
everyone,
scott
largent,
this
kind
of
you
know
better
late
than
never.
I
guess
is
where
I'm
getting
at
right.
Now,
we've
kind
of
been
around
this
roller
coaster
for
a
long
time
too
little
too
late
might
be
a
good
one
too.
S
I
we
need
a
place
to
go.
I
I
live
out
in
the
the
mop
bucket
out
here
at
the
faa
crash
zone,
which
is
pretty
much
the
largest
homeless
encampment
in
the
state
of
california.
S
When
you
put
everybody
into
one
mop
bucket,
you
cannot
really
help
them.
Everybody
has
different
needs
here
and
I
I
don't
see
the
city
really
kind
of
figuring
things
out
on
that
level.
We
do
need
a
place
to
go.
I
think
the
fairgrounds
would
be
fantastic,
but
you
guys
won't
take
the
time
to
vet
people
out
and
figuring
out
where
they
will
succeed.
You'll
just
put
them
all
together.
You
know
in
jails,
they
have
classification
systems,
not
everybody
gets
stacked
together,
but
that's
not
the
way
that
what
happens
in
the
homeless
community.
S
You
guys
set
up
your
other
little
gig
at
71
vista
montana,
that
that
that
was
a
big
big
disaster.
Okay-
and
you
guys
know,
I'm
a
big
time
homeless
advocate
putting
that
right
on
the
other
side
of
the
fence
of
a
kid's
park
was
absolutely
ridiculous.
There's
really
only
two
people
over
there
right
now
and
there's
seven
motor
homes
and
you
guys
could
have
succeeded
over
there.
S
If
you
got
the
families
from
maybe
out
here
at
spring
street,
several
of
the
disabled
women
that
are
over
here
near
the
corner,
the
asian
gentleman
that
is
just
a
dynamite
guy.
Those
people
would
have
worked
okay
and
the
mexican
families
over
here
that
are
immigrants.
They
could
have
brought
their
children
to
that
playground.
S
The
neighbors
would
have
been
like
wow.
These
are
good
people,
they
work,
they
have
children,
you
know
fantastic.
Instead,
that's
not
how
it
worked
out.
This
is
just
a
disaster,
and
now
you're
sweeping
people
from
zone
to
zone
out
here
right
now,
with
no.
C
Hi,
the
fairgrounds
is
a
county-owned
property,
so
it
should
be
used
for
the
benefit
of
all
in
the
county,
not
a
specific
group.
It
should
be
used
for
children
and
teens
and
seniors
an
example
of
a
local
city
within
the
county
that
developed
land
to
benefit
all
is
the
morgan
hill
community
center
aquatic
park
and
ballpark.
I
hope
I
hope
you
all
can
see
it.
Such
a
difference.
Kids
can
play
at
the
ballpark
without
drug
needles
there,
and
this
could
be
developed.
They
also
have
a
developmental
asset
annual
asset
calendar.
C
It
is
a
40-year
proven
program
used
in
that
area
to
help
prevent
youth
homelessness,
district
7,
our
children
in
this
district,
our
teens
in
this
district.
They
deserve
the
right
to
play
safely
in
the
creeks.
That
should
be
a
rite
of
passage.
They
deserve
to
walk
safely
without
being
threatened,
as
I
myself
have
been.
District
7
is
already
crowded.
It's
lacking
in
safe
outdoor
space.
We
have
heard
from
our
firefighters
we've
heard
from
our
police
officers.
C
We
heard
from
tasha
who
compared
this
to
the
black
ghettos
in
chicago
that
that
I
have
heard
so
much
or
read
so
much
about.
There
has
been
a
large
area
near
north
san
jose.
It
has
a
plan
in
place,
including
housing
for
thousands,
including
low
income
and
transitional
housing,
with
some
funding
by
apple,
it
is
held
up
in
litigation
by
the
city
of
san
jose,
santa
clara
and
others,
and
this
area
is
far
better
suited
than
district
7,
which
has
been
highly
impacted.
C
Talking
about
someone
mentioned,
put
them
all
in
one
place.
Well,
that
has
been
done.
We
have
markham
plaza
here,
it's
on
monterey,
road,
it's
notorious
for
the
crime
and
violence
and
drug
use,
constant
police
and
fire
calls.
We
have
the
almost
new
renaissance
place
right
near
the
fairgrounds.
Already
it's
a
social
experiment.
C
It
is
called
a
drugless
and
law
environment
by
the
people
that
live
there.
The
on
house
are
important,
but
so
are
the
children
and
putting
them
all
together
does
not
help
them
integrate
in
society.
It
isolates
them.
District
7
should
have
not
bear
the
brunt
of
the
impact
of
all
the
different
cities
that
make
up
santa
clara
county.
Thank
you.
A
Hi
good
afternoon
my
name
is
brian
prescott.
I'm
a
member
of.
M
Hey
brian
we're
going
to
put
you
back
in
the
queue
and
and
come
back
to
you.
Jonathan.
Q
Hi,
my
name
is
jonathan
fleming
here,
and
you
know
I'm
not
going
to
comment
for
against
the
actual
proposal,
but
I
will
make
a
general
comment
about
it
and
we
need
to
increase
the
amount
of
police
presence
and
numbers
specifically
in
district
lincoln
police
district,
lincoln
city
council
district
7..
You
know
right
now.
Some
of
the
most
dangerous
calls
in
our
city
are
at
the
markham,
plaza
apartments
and
reticent
place,
which
are
right
next
door
to
the
proposed
site.
Q
District
lincoln
has
the
highest
rate
call
rate
in
the
city
and
the
officers
there
are
always
overworked.
I
have
personally
organized
cleanups
for
the
tully
ball
fields,
again
right
next
door
to
the
proposed
site,
where
mentally
ill
people
have
defecated
in
front
of
children
where
used
syringes,
have
cut
and
hurt
children
where
people
have
engaged
in
sexual
acts
in
front
of
children
and
more
that
area
needs
help.
Q
M
A
I
Me
loud
and
clear:
well,
it
must
be
campaign
season.
If
jonathan
fleming's
back
out,
I
was
calling
because
I
want
to
know
where
are
the
unhoused
voices
in
these
proposals,
because
it
just
seems
that
people
are
making
these
proposals
and
they're
not
consulting
any
house
voices
when
they
make
them,
and
there
should
be
no
proposals
about
unhoused
people
without
unhoused
people's
voices
in
them,
and
the
reason
that
I
say
that
is
when
you
talk
to
unhoused
folks.
They
stay
where
they're
from
so.
I
If
they're
living
in
willow
glen,
they
are
likely
from
willow
glen
they
shopped
there.
They
grew
up
there.
They
went
to
church
there,
they
graduated
from
high
school
there.
If
they
are
in
seven,
that's
where
they're
from
they
went
to
school
there,
they
graduated
there,
their
kids
probably
still
live
there.
It's
the
same
reason,
so
you
can't
take
people
from
like
all
over
the
city
or
from
like
the
nice
white
district
that
mostly
has
houses
and
doesn't
want
to
have
homeless
people
and
ship
them
somewhere
else.
I
It
doesn't
work.
So
you
have
to
talk
to
unhealth
people
and
say
hey.
If
we
rounded
you
all
up
and
shipped
you
somewhere,
would
you
all
want
to
do
that?
No
and
the
reasons
for
that
are
multiple
aside
from
taking
people
out
of
the
communities
that
they're
from
and
that
they
want
to
stay
in
just
like
house
people.
It's
also
because
you
mix
nortania
with
sereno
abuser
with
abusee,
and
you
can't
do
that.
I
That's
why
programs
fail,
but
if
you
don't
listen
to
the
voices
of
the
unhoused,
you
just
continue
to
hurt
them
and
programs
like
this
will
hurt
them,
and
you
just
can't
shoot
people
from
neighborhoods
that
you
don't
want
to
maintain
their
whiteness
to
maintain
their
rightness
to
maintain
their
single
family
homeless
and
put
them
in
areas
that
are
browner.
Just
like
the
homeless
people.
You
can't
do
that.
It's
not
right.
Q
Hi
this
is
alex
shore
speaking
personally
today,
and
there
have
been
a
lot
of
proposals
by
a
lot
of
council
members
and
the
mayor
over
the
years
to
work
on
these
issues,
and
it
takes.
They
say
it
takes
a
village,
but
it
also
takes
a
bevy
of
proposals
to
solve
a
housing
crisis
as
big
as
this
one,
and
thank
you
to
all
the
staff
and
advocates
in
the
past
who
have
recommended
policies
like
what
council
member
mayhem
is
talking
about.
Q
Q
We
do
have
enough
land
in
this
community
to
house
all
the
people
here,
but
we
don't
have
all
that
land
available
for
development
and
the
more
land
that
we
can
set
aside
for
development,
the
better
to
get
housing
for
people,
so
it
takes
a
variety
of
solutions.
This
is
a
great
one
from
councilmember
mahan.
Q
I
think
this
again
is
a
worthy
one
and
I'm
very
thankful
for
rules
committee
for
considering
it.
I
hope
that
the
entire
council
will
support
this
as
well
as
continue
to
support
a
number
of
solutions.
We
need
integrated
communities
throughout
san
jose
and
it
is
good
that
homeless,
folks,
previously
homeless,
folks
are
living
throughout
our
community.
We
need
to
have
sites
all
across
the
city.
Q
A
Hello,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
go
ahead,
hi.
This
is
mason
song
good
evening
good
afternoon,
honorable
vice
mayor
and
council
members.
I
just
am
speaking
today
in
my
capacity
as
a
sunnyvale
city,
council,
member
and
a
santa
clara
county
resident,
not
as
a
member
of
council
member
mayhem
staff
which
full
disclaimer
I
am.
A
I
just
wanted
to
provide
perspective
on
how
sunny
sunnyvale
and
every
other
city
in
santa
clara
county
needs
to
do
what
this
proposal
is
proposing,
which
is
be
a
part
of
the
solution
and
identify
sites
within
our
own
cities
to
get
the
job
done,
and
I
just
wanted
to
encourage
those
who
have
spoken
thus
far
to
please
read
the
memo
which,
if
you
find
it,
it
will
say
that
it
includes
district
10
as
one
of
the
districts
of
consideration
for
a
potential
emergency
interim
housing
site,
but
just
to
provide
perspective.
Really
quick.
A
Sunnyvale
has
a
shelter,
that's
funded
by
the
county
in
the
north
side
and
what
that
took
years
to
get,
and
we
had
a
project
where
we
had
voucher
programs
for
residents
and
that
money
has
run
out
and
we
do
not
actually
qualify
for
most
of
the
funding
that
san
jose
as
a
large
city
qualifies
for,
and
so
we
actually
struggle
to
construct.
These
kind
of
life
moves
projects,
and
so
I'm
very
encouraged
that
san
jose
is
taking
the
lead
here
and
that
I
hope
that
sunnyvale
and
every
other
city
can
take
can
follow
suit.
M
Thank
you.
Next
person
is
gail,
go
ahead,
gail.
J
Good
afternoon,
I
would
like
to
thank
councilmember
mahan
for
his
courage
in
bringing
this
forward.
I'm
talking
about
the
six
other
council
districts
that
really
don't
have
any
kind
of
encampments
housing.
Anything
for
the
unhound
council
member
mayhem
has
a
wonderful
small,
little
encampment
in
district
10,
and
I
brought
him
there
and
he
has
a
relationship
with
some
of
those
people
and
he
understands
maybe
the
the
fairgrounds
isn't
the
right
fit,
but
putting
unhoused
in
other
council
districts
should
be
number
one,
especially
let's
say
my
district
council
council
d9.
J
J
J
What's
going
to
start
happening
on
monday
for
the
next
two
weeks,
and
where
are
these
folks
going?
Please
can't
we
get
something
you're
going
to
have
over
325
people
moving
into
your
neighborhoods
and-
and
I
know
you
don't
get
it,
but
you
got
to
get
it,
there's
no
place
for
them
to
go
and
what
councilman
council
member
mahan
is
proposing.
Let's
get
them
in
some
of
our
other
council
districts.
J
J
Yes,
thank
you
so
much
for
your
time.
I
appreciate
you
looking
at
this
homeless
issue,
which
is
impacting
all
the
districts
and
the
entire
county.
Let's
be
clear,
it
is
the
main
responsibility
of
the
county
to
work
on
homelessness
and
on
mental
health
issues
using
county
land.
To
do
that
in
all
cities
in
the
county
is
a
better
solution
than
what
we
have
now,
which
has
basically
been
unworkable
and
not
feasible,
while
none
of
us
may
want
homeless.
J
Next
to
us,
we
need
to
house
them
and
we
need
to
use
it
on
the
land
that
is
part
of
the
county.
The
county
is
the
main
responsibility
for
this.
We
should
not
let
them
off
the
hook.
We
should
bring
this
forward
for
a
full
discussion
at
the
council.
We
should
be
applying
pressure
to
the
county
to
live
up
to
its
measure,
a
obligations,
and
they
have
the
funding
for
this.
Please
move
this
forward
to
the
entire
council.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
your
time
on
working
on
these
very
difficult
issues.
M
Thank
you
person
with
the
number
ending
in
8354.
A
Great,
so
I'm
a
resident
in.
A
I
am
hesitant-
and
I
also
have
strong
concerns
as
a
resident
of
this
district
district
7,
because
we
do
live
very
close
to
the
fairgrounds
and
we
already
have
a
very
high
population
of
unhoused
members
in
our
district.
I
don't
understand
why
we
would
put
more
of
these
members
without
proper
vetting
and
we
talk
about
integration
throughout
the
city,
but
it
always
seems
that
district
7
is
always
kind
of
that.
First,
one
to
be
thrown
into
the
pot.
A
And
just
to
mention
our
intersection
of
monterey
and
kurtner
alone
has
already
had
three
recent
deaths:
seven
this
year,
six
of
them
being
hit
and
run
accidents,
and
for
two
of
these
two
of
these
fatalities,
two
of
them
were
unhoused
community
members,
I'm
not
placing
any
faults
here,
but
it
doesn't
seem
like
a
great
idea
to
put
even
a
higher
population,
more
people
in
close
proximity
to
one
of
our
more
dangerous
intersections
in
our
city.
I
I
City
of
san
jose
staff
do
an
excellent
job
of
understanding.
The
issues
we're
dealing
with
the
bottleneck
really
comes
from
as
you've
witnessed
today
the
resistance
we
have
from
residents
who
will
push
back
it's
very
difficult
to
take
action
because
of
that
kind
of
pushback.
I
would
like
to
really
commend
councilmember
cohen
for
his
job
in
setting
up
a
safe
rv
park
for
people
who
were
displaced
from
the
apple
property.
That
kind
of
courage
and
leadership
is
exactly
what
we
need
mayor.
Sam
really
had
the
right
idea
when
he
said
that
homelessness
is
an
emergency.
I
M
T
T
T
I
am
just
very
much
saddened
by
that
and
I'm
sorry
if
you've
been
lied
to
in
some
way,
so
I
am
going
to
take
the
time
to
walk
through
my
memo
pretty
carefully,
because
I
think
it's
important
that
we
are
all
on
the
same
page
about
what
I'm
proposing,
and
I
heard
a
lot
of
comments
that
just
make
me
sad
because
they're
not
they're
not
actually
responsive
to
the
memo.
So
I
just
encourage
everyone
to
if
you're
really
concerned
to
please
look.
T
T
First
of
all,
I
want
to
start
by
saying
that
I
think
you
know
one
of
the
real
silver
linings
of
this
pandemic
is
that
we
have
proven,
through
a
variety
of
different
bridge
housing
sites
that
we
built
quickly
in
response
to
covid
in
different
districts,
that
we
can
build
high
quality,
safe
shelter
and
semi-permanent
housing
for
the
homeless.
We
can
do
it
fast.
We
can
do
it
at
low
cost,
much
lower
cost
than
previous
work
to
build
housing
for
the
homeless.
T
That's
a
real,
it's
an
important
learning
and
it's
a
real
win
for
our
community
and
to
the
comments
about
understanding
the
underlying
causes
and
the
many
different
individual
needs
of
the
homeless.
I
appreciate
those
comments.
I
spend
a
fair
bit
of
time
out
of
the
encampments
in
district
10
talking
with
the
residents
of
encampments,
but
I
think
the
research
shows
that
we
have
to
get
people
stably
and
securely
sheltered
prior
to
making
real
headway
on
some
of
those
underlying
issues.
T
T
So
we
have
this
proof
of
concept
from
the
bridge
housing
sites
that
we've
built
and
they're
great,
but
in
total
they're
only
about
300
units
and
the
reality
is
that
the
number
of
people
living
on
our
streets.
I
heard
a
lot
of
concerns
about
the
homeless
and
the
the
trash
and
the
the
concerns
about
crime
and
other
other
impacts
on
our
neighborhoods
and
that's
part
of
my
motivation.
T
In
addition
to
wanting
to
address
the
humanitarian
crisis
that
we're
seeing
on
our
streets
every
day,
we
know
that
the
number
of
people
living
on
our
streets
is
pretty
easy
times
that
well
over
six
thousand
people.
So
we
we
built
300
of
these
bridge
housing
units.
We
did
them
fast.
We
didn't
cost
effectively
and
they're
working,
but
we
need
at
least
20
times
that
kind
of
scale.
T
T
Will
side
is,
as
I
talk
to
residents
in
district
10,
you
know
we're
exploring
building
to
again
to
some
of
the
public
comments,
we're
actually
going
through
the
process
right
now
of
exploring
building
the
largest
of
these
bridge
housing
sites
in
the
city
in
district
10..
It
would
be
by
far
the
largest,
not
just
another
site,
but
double
the
size
of
any
that
have
been
built.
Yet
I
just
want
to
be
really
clear
about
that.
T
We
also
have
two
affordable
housing
sites
in
district
10,
currently
under
construction
following
blossom
hill
road
and
we're
in
conversation
with
vta
about
two
additional
housing
developments
that
would
include
affordable
housing
in
district
10..
So
we're
currently
talking
about
five
projects.
Just
in
district
10.-
and
I
understand
historically
districts,
three
districts,
seven
and
district
six
have
you
know:
do
host
a
disproportionate
share
of
affordable
and
supportive
housing.
That's
that's
certainly
true,
and
I'm
not
disagreeing
with
that
I'll
get
to
that
in
a
moment
as
well.
T
But
what
I'm
hearing
from
residents-
and
I
think
probably
most
of
us
are
hearing-
is
that
the
frustration
with
encampments
and
the
challenges
of
having
six
thousand
seven
thousand
plus
people
living
on
our
streets
are
so
that
the
frustration
level
is
so
high
that
I
think
people
are
open
to
and
ready
for
solutions,
even
if
they're
imperfect.
So
what
does
my
memo
do?
And
I
want
to
be
really
clear
about
this,
because
I
heard
a
lot
of
public
comment
today
that
doesn't
seem
to
refer
to
my
memo.
T
It
directs
the
city
manager
to
first
and
foremost,
come
back
by
the
end
of
the
year
with
six
sites
in
our
city,
prioritizing
these
six
districts,
including
mine
in
district
10,
that
do
not
have
a
recent
bridge
or
interim
emergency
interim
housing
site
constructed
and
to
work
with
the
county
to
look
at
lands
county-wide.
There
is
no
way
that
san
jose
alone
with
city
land,
or
that
san
jose
with
city
and
county
lounge
land,
just
within
our
city
boundaries,
can
or
should
solve
this
problem.
This
has
to
be
a
distributed,
county-wide
effort.
T
T
County-Wide
effort,
including
in
the
six
districts
that
thus
far,
have
not
built
one
of
these
one
of
these
sites,
so
part
of
what
is
really
important
to
remember
is
the
urgency
of
the
state
funding
that's
available.
We
have
a
once
in
a
lifetime
opportunity
to
build
in
a
distributed
way
across
our
county.
T
So
let
me
in
closing,
I
know
I'm
going
on
a
little
long
here,
but
I
want
to
just
touch
on
a
couple
of
other
items
that
have
come
up
because
they're
they're
in
the
memo
and
they're
relevant
to
the
public
comment
and
other
concerns.
I've
heard
on
the
point
about
the
fairgrounds
the
fairgrounds
is
listed
in
the
third
recommendation,
as
a
site
for
which
I.
T
Asked
the
county
about
feasibility-
and
I
very
explicitly
say
that
one
we
should
not
concentrate
the
problem
at
the
fairgrounds
or
concentrate
the
solution
I
mean
at
the
fairgrounds
and
that
if
the
county
executive
feels
that
the
county
has
plans
for
other
uses
of
the
fairgrounds,
that
would
be
better
for
the
community,
which
I
would
very
much
support.
T
Then
please
offer
up
some
other
land.
Please
identify
some
other
land
in
the
county
that
could
be
utilized
for
these
purposes.
So
there's
no
suggestion
that
the
fairgrounds
is
the
only
site
or
the
best
site
or
the
oh.
It's
just.
It
is
a
lot
of
land.
I
do
say
for
for
purposes
of
illustration
that
we
could
end
street
homelessness
in
our
community
with
about
50
acres
county-wide.
Now
the
fairgrounds
has
150
acres.
That
was
not
meant
to
imply
that
all
50
acres
should
be
at
the
fairgrounds.
T
So
I
apologize
if
that
was
not
clear,
but
I
want
to
make
that
crystal
clear
now.
I
am
not
suggesting
a
50
acre
bridge
housing
site
at
the
county
fairgrounds.
In
fact,
it
may
very
well
be
the
case
that
the
county
has
other
better
plans
for
those
for
that
land,
and
if
so,
I
will
be
very
happy
as
long
as
the
county
helps
us
identify
other
land.
T
The
county
is
the
largest
landowner
in
the
county
and
there's
no
way
to
solve
this
problem
without
the
county
offering
land,
in
addition
to
the
many
supportive
services
that
they
are
responsible
for
as
the
primary
provider
of
human
services
in
our
county
last
two
points
here
on
operating
costs.
I
know
this
came
up
in
the
staff
evaluation.
T
I
think
one
of
the
biggest
misunderstandings
here
is
that
this
form
of
housing
is
some
sort
of
flimsy
temporary
housing
and
that
we're
just
going
to
build
a
bunch
of
it
and
not
not
be
able
to
maintain
it
or
operate
it.
We
can
build
with
prefab
modular
units
housing
that
is
high
enough
quality,
with
with
in-suite
bathrooms,
with
with
storage
with
in-suite
sinks.
T
These
can
be
high
quality
enough
to
be
eligible
for
federal
vouchers,
which
can
fund
ongoing
operations
of
these
sites,
and
I
am
quite
confident
that
the
state
is
not
going
to
make
billions
of
dollars
available
to
us
this
year
to
build
these
sites
and
then
not
be
able
to
come
up
with
the
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars.
It
would
take
next
year
to
operate
them.
T
What
we
have
right
now
is
an
opportunity
if
we
move
quickly
and
decisively
in
partnership
with
the
county
and
nonprofit
service
providers,
to
identify
the
land
get
in
the
applications,
secure
the
funds
buy
the
modular
prefab
units
and
get
the
capacity
built
out
on
sites
across
the
county
and
there's
work
being
done
right
now
at
the
county.
I
think
you'll
probably
hear
some
news
on
this
the
next
day
or
two.
That
is
right
in
line
with
this
identifying
sites
in
other
places.
T
T
It
is
true
that
there
are
some
restrictions
on
who
we
can
give
preference
to
based
on
the
funding
sources.
We
use
to
build
these
sites,
but
the
spirit
of
the
local
preference
is
simply
this.
The
neighborhoods,
and
I
mean
that
plural,
not
one.
The
neighborhoods,
including
those
in
district
10
that
take
on
these
sites,
ought
to
see
the
benefits
as
well.
T
This
is
about
taking
encampments
and
street
homelessness
and
the
dire
conditions
people
are
living
in
and
the
really
negative
impacts
on
the
local
neighborhoods
and
community
and
the
eco
or
local
ecology
or
creeks
in
particular,
and
it's
about
building
an
alternative
and
ensuring
that
folks
have
that
opportunity
to
transition
out
of
encampments
and
into
stable,
safe
shelter,
and
those
neighborhoods
ought
to
see
the
benefits,
and
I
understand
there
are
restrictions.
What
I'm
asking
staff
to
do
is
to
be
creative
about
figuring
out.
T
The
investments
in
homeless
outreach,
supportive
services
security
beautification
to
ensure
that
the
neighborhoods
that
take
on
what
will
be
perceived
as
the
burden
of
bridge
housing
see
some
of
the
benefit
and
and
understand
that
that
they're
being
part
of
a
solution
and
it's
working,
the
public
needs
to
see
that
these
sites
actually
are
working
and
can
enhance
our
collective
quality
of
life.
So
I
appreciate
my
colleagues
giving
me
the
time
to
lay
that
out.
T
I
felt
the
need,
after
the
incredible
amount
of
misinformation
that
seems
to
have
been
pushed
out
and
seemingly
organized
today,
to
lay
out
what
the
memo
actually
does
and
try
to
set
the
record
straight.
So
with
that,
I
will
turn
it
back
to
the
chair,
and
I
appreciate
everyone's
time
and
consideration.
M
Thank
you,
council
member
man,
councilmember
braless.
B
Yeah,
thank
you
very
much
and
I
will
say
I
do
appreciate
councilmember
mayhem
explicitly
calling
out
the
need
to
have
his
own
district
be
prioritized
in
one
of
the
next
emergency
interim
housing
sites
that
we
can
roll
out.
B
I
don't
necessarily
think
it
was
too
wise
to
call
out
another
district,
specifically
a
non-city-owned
parcel
as
a
solution,
and
I
think
that's
likely
why
there
was
some
some
fear
and
anxiety
from
individuals
that
called
in
that
I
you
know,
I
recognize,
may
not
be
fully
aware
of
what
the
intent
there
was
simply
because
it's
not
coming
from,
I
think,
number
one,
a
county
official
but
number
two
someone
representative
of
of
their
community.
B
I
would
say
that
you
know
the
effort
to
address
a
crisis
such
as
homelessness
with
the
magnitude
of
homelessness.
It's
it's
like
a
marathon
race,
it's
a
marathon
race
for
several
marathon
races
with
a
relay
team,
and
we
are
participants
in
that,
along
with
a
lot
of
other
stakeholders
that
are
working
to
end
homelessness
and-
and
I've
been
a
part
of
that
now
for
the
last
six
and
a
half
years.
B
But
this
is
a
crisis
that
has
been
ongoing
for
decades
and
and
really
growing
over
the
last
decade.
B
I
do
recognize
council,
member
mayhem
in
being
new,
doesn't
have
the
benefit
of
being
or
having
been
present
for
all
the
conversations
that
I
have
and
other
colleagues
here
have
been
a
part
of,
and
and
I
see
that
that
was
recognized
in
the
early
consideration
response
from
staff
as
they
indicated
that,
in
fact,
what
council
member
mayhem
is
asking
for
is
being
done
today
has
been
prioritized
previously,
and
I
know
that
personally,
because
much
of
the
work
that
has
been
done
has
come
from
directives
that
I
have
either
led
or
signed
on
to
dating
back
to
as
early
as
my
initial
terms
on
the
council,
but
specifically
from
the
work
that
councilman
mayhem
is
directing
from
memorandums
in
2017,
re-initiated
or
re-emphasized,
with
some
directions
from
councilor
jimenez
in
april
of
last
year,
as
staff
indicated
in
their
early
response
form
some
updates
on
the
sites
through
a
staff
presentation
last
year
in
april.
B
But
again
it's
it's.
It's
maybe
not
to
the
benefit
of
counselor
mayhem
for
not
being
a
part
of
those.
I
think
to
to
not
be
fully
aware
of
where
some
of
the
work
that
we're
already
doing
is
is
coming
from
and
where
we
want
to
move
forward
with
it.
I
do
want
to
ask
staff
based
on
your
early
consideration
form
there.
Is
that
the
correct
reading
of
what
you
have
put
forward,
that
that
what
work
councilman
is
is
directing
is
actually
indeed
already
being
done.
L
L
Yeah,
I
would
ask
reagan
to
jump
in
there,
but
I
think
some
of
it
obviously
we've
and
reagan
knows
this-
have,
I
would
say,
pounded
the
pavement
and
speaking
to
other
public
agencies
about
additional
sites.
That's
been
a
very
long
conversation
and,
quite
frankly,
quite
complex.
L
So
I
think
there's
this
additional
specificity
in
here
related
to
that
that
we
need
to
follow
up
on
and
then
at
least
in
some
of
the
verbal
comments
right
now
about
additional
analysis,
possibly
around
funding
streams
and
new
money
and
new
types
of
projects
that
I
know
that
we
are
analyzing
and
that
haven't
done.
But
it
sounds
like
council.
Member
mayhem
might
have
something
more
specific
that
we
need
to
look
at
there
as
well.
M
If
it's
okay
with
councilmember
perales,
do
you
want
to
finish
council
member
problems
or
do
you
want
council,
member
mayhem
to
chime
in.
B
I
wanted
to
hear,
as
I
think
lee
pointed
out,
reagan's
response
first,
maybe
to
what
I
think
our
staff
would
know
specifically
what
might
be
new
work
and
what
might
not.
So
I'd
like
to
hear
from
her
first
on
the
specifics
of
that.
R
2016,
maybe
we
asked
county
and
the
water
district
for
available
sites
for
our
bridge
housing
communities
and
they
did
not
have
sites
available
if
we
wanted
a
more
extensive
analysis.
R
If
we
were
to
get
new
sites,
we
do
have
an
existing
list
of
city
sites
that
we
could
relatively
quickly
bring
back.
I
don't
think
that
list
that
existing
list
will
yield
six
more
sites,
I'm
certain
of
it.
If
we
wanted
to
do
a
more
extensive
feasibility
analysis
determining
viability
of
a
site,
it
would
require
more
staff
effort.
If
we
wanted
to
look
at
pre-development
work
or
engineering
work
that
would
for
sites
that
would
take
more
staff
time
that
we
don't
have.
B
So
if,
if
that
were
the
case
so
outside
of
what
work
you're
already
doing,
which
for
the
most
part,
I
think
is,
is
what's
being
asked
here,
you're
saying:
if
we
were
to
try
to
dive
further,
then
it
wouldn't
be
a
green
light
response,
as
I
think
that's
what
the
early
consideration
form
kind
of
denoted
too
right
that
if
it,
if,
if
indeed
it
went
further,
that
that's
not
necessarily
you
would
need
staff
resources
right,
you
would
need.
You
would
need
more.
L
That
is
correct.
Reagan
is
absolutely
correct,
so
I
mean
I
we
do
have
the
existing
list
and
obviously
we
can
go
back
out
to
the
other
public
agencies
and
ask
again:
a
lot
has
happened
since
we
last
did
that
and
the
feasibility
can
definitely.
L
L
However,
if
it's
getting
into
viability,
you
know
with
engineering
the
pre-development
work
on
all
of
these
sites
before
we
come
back
to
council.
That
would
be
different,
so
I
think,
with
the
forum,
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
say
the
feasibility
work
can
happen
and
we
can
bring
that
forward
and
then
have
a
more
substantial
conversation
with
the
council,
because
resources
would
be
involved.
Then
yes,.
B
Okay,
so
the
feasibility
sounds
like
it's.
Would
that
be
new
work
then,
or
is
it
just
or.
L
Coming
back
out
again
and
to
the
agencies
I
mean,
I
would
say,
reagan
and
her
team,
as
well
as
nancy,
in
real
estate
they're
in
ongoing
conversations
with
agencies
all
the
time
and
and
obviously
the
memorandum
here
contemplates
something
much
more
official,
I
would
say
from
our
city
manager
to
the
county
executive,
which
we
will
we're
also
prepared
to
do
and
work
through.
So
I
would
say
you
know
a
lot
of
additional
work.
L
T
Yeah,
thank
you
I
I
would
love
to
chime
in.
I.
You
know
appreciate
that
I'm
new
to
the
council,
but
I
don't
particularly
appreciate
the
suggestion
that
I
don't
know
what
I'm
talking
about,
because
I'm
new
here
I've
spent
quite
a
bit
of
time
talking
to
staff
about
the
past
research
done,
I'm
well
aware
of
it.
I've
been
through
the
list.
T
The
lists
are
incomplete.
I've
worked
with
public
works
on
gis
analysis
for
caltrans
land
that
had
not
been
considered
until
this
year.
County
lands
have
not
been
considered
on
the
list
I
received.
I
went
I
vetted
this
memo
through
the
city
manager's
office
and
my
request
is
not
for
long
lists.
In
fact,
you
know
it's
interesting.
The
site
that
we're
preparing
to
build
on
in
district
10
isn't
even
on
the
city's
list.
T
So
it
is.
It
is
an
incomplete
list
and
I
am
asking
for
more
work,
but
I'm
not
asking
for
you
know
lists
of
hundreds
of
sites,
I'm
very
specifically
asking
if
the
city
manager
come
back
before
the
end
of
the
year
with
at
least
six
sites
that
we
can
move
forward
on,
so
that
we
can
submit
applications
for
pro
for
home
key,
and
I
think
the
council
probably
ought
to
do
an
up
up
or
down
vote
on
all
the
sites
together,
but
I'm
I'm
not
asking
for
redundant
analysis.
T
I'm
asking
us
to
take
all
the
past
work
we've
done,
which
we
have
added
to
this
year
and
which
more
could
be
added
and
we
should
discuss
what
is
the
staff
cost
and
what's
the
potential
trade-off,
I
personally
am
not
willing
to
miss
the
opportunity
to
apply
for
home
key
funds,
given
the
incredible
sum
of
money
that
is
first
come
first
serve
and
is
new
money.
So
I
just
I
don't
agree
that
it's
all
been
done
and
we
have
all
the
answers.
I
think
we
need
to
take
the
research
we've
done.
T
There's
we
can
do
endless
research.
There
are
plenty
of
gaps
in
it.
I'd
like
us
to
identify
six
sites
and
then
have
a
discussion
about
whether
or
not
we're
gonna
apply
for
those
six
sites,
because
we
just
we
need
to
stop
going
around
in
circles.
We
need
to
identify
sites
that
get
a
scale,
find
the
partners
and
put
in
the
applications.
That's
what
I'm
asking
for.
B
Yeah,
thank
you,
and
I
never
said
you
you.
You
know
that
you
didn't
know
what
you
were
talking
about
here.
That
was
not
my
my
intent.
What
I
said
was
you,
don't
know
everything
and
that
that's
expected,
because
this
is
really
a
large
body
of
work,
and
you
know
whether
it's
quick
analysis
or
conversations.
B
It's
really
impossible
for
me,
included
even
being
involved
in
this
work
for
six
and
a
half
years
to
really
know
everything
and
and
know
the
answers
moving
forward
and
as
you've
seen
from
the
staff
response
in
large
part,
what
you're
asking
for
has
been
asked
for,
and
it
is
being
done.
I
don't
think
we
need
a
direction
to
actually
allow
you
or
any
other
council
district.
B
That's
currently
not
hosting
an
eah,
the
ea
eih
site
to
host
one
we've
actually
had
that
commitment,
your
predecessor
committed
to
it
along
with
me
and
the
rest
of
the
council
on
each
council
district
hosting
such
a
site.
Unfortunately,
we're
now
many
years
down
the
road
and
we
haven't
gotten
there,
which
is
why
I
I
started
off.
You
know
appreciating
the
fact
that
you're
willing
to
step
up
and
say,
hey,
that's
that's
something
that
you
want
to
do,
but
we
don't
necessarily
need
a
direction.
B
I
think
at
the
council
for
you
to
do
that
or,
quite
frankly,
anybody
else
in
the
council.
I
would
agree-
and
I
do
think
it's
it's
wise
to
not.
You
know,
consider
lists
that
we've
had
for
a
number
of
years
to
be
thorough
and
complete
that
we
want
to
go
back
and
reevaluate.
Our
you
know
are
the
list
of
sites
that
we're
currently
running
off
of
that
hundred
sites
that
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
and
staff
spend
a
lot
of
energy
compiling
several
years
ago
that
somehow
that
is
exhaustive.
B
I
think
we
knew
that
at
that
point
we
were
looking
for
the
best
and
and
easiest
sites
that
we
could
work
with,
and
even
even
in
that
we,
what
we
determined
was
that
there
were
a
lot
of
those
sites
that
had
a
number
of
challenges
or
and
feasibilities
due
to
one
thing
or
another,
and
ultimately,
we've
continued
to
move
down
that
path
and
as
staff
brought
forward
options
last
year
on
the
the
best
sites
to
move
forward
on.
B
Given
the
fact
that
we
had
to
move
expeditiously,
that's
what
we
have
done,
but
I
don't
think
that
what
necessarily
you're
you're
asking
for
is
is
going
to
to
move
that
needle
much
further.
In
fact,
I
do
think
it
would
really
we
would
be
analyzing
a
number
of
sites
or
other
age
asking
other
agencies
to
analyze
more
sites,
especially
in
other
agencies,
where
we
don't
control
that
jurisdiction,
where
we
may
not
come
up
with
too
many
more
fruits
for
our
for
our
labors
there
versus.
B
I
think,
let's
act
on
what
we
can
today,
if
you
have
sites
in
your
district.
I
think
that
is
amazing
and
I
appreciate
you
being
willing
to
move
forward
on
those.
I
would
not
necessarily
support
your
third
request
there
that
we
have
a
direct
and
and
specific
advocacy
in
regards
to
parcel
of
land
that
is
not
owned
by
the
city,
one
that
we
have
had
conversations
with
the
county
numerous
times
that
we
recognize
is
not
in
our
jurisdiction.
That
actually
is
today.
B
It
is
hosting
some
interim
emergency
housing
sites
there
and
and
or
unhoused
individuals,
and
it
is
doing
so,
but
at
the
same
time
we
recognize
we're
we're
we're
really
spinning
our
wheels
there
with
the
county
because
of
the
responses
that
we
have
heard
year
over
year
on
the
plans
that
they
have
for
the
area,
not
to
mention,
I
don't
necessarily
agree
just
because
it's
a
large
swath
of
land
that
we
should
be
looking
for
large
scale,
which
that
is,
that
is
terminology
directly
from
your
memo.
B
And
so
I
can
understand
why
community
members
maybe
took
that
to
believe
you
know
there
wasn't
an
exact
number
associated
to
it.
So
I
think
the
determinant
of
itself
to
me
as
well
was
was
alarming,
because
large
scale,
as
we
know,
is,
is
not
necessarily
the
best
solution
when
we
are
housing.
B
Individuals
of
high
need-
and
we've
seen
that,
unfortunately
play
out
in
some
of
the
solutions
that
we've
had
to
date,
actually
smaller
scale
or
more
manageable
scale,
and
specifically
in
and
around
the
60
to
80,
but
definitely
less
than
100
range
is,
is
something
that
that
has
proven
to
be
more
successful
as
we
look
at
the
the
other
cities
around
the
country
that
have
engaged
down
some
of
these
efforts
and
when
we
look
at
some
of
our
own
efforts
here
in
the
the
city
of
san
jose.
B
So
if
and
the
question
for
staff,
if
we
were
to
move
forward
with
the
more
extensive
analysis,
essentially,
let's
say
updating
the
list
of
sites
not
only
city
sites,
but
then
other
public
agencies,
county
caltrans
bta.
If
we
were
to
look
at
that,
what
would
the
based
on
the
the
early
response
memo
you
have?
What
would
that
look
like?
What
would
your
response
be
if
that
is
indeed,
what
we're
asking
to
to
do?
Is
that
something
that's
still
green
lit
or
or
what
is
the
response.
R
B
L
I
wouldn't
say
priority
setting,
I
think
when
it
comes
to
resources,
I
think
it's
more
roadmap
or
or
really
the
budget
process,
but
I
I
think
your
question:
did
you
ask
about
viability,
or
did
you
ask
kind
of
within
how
we
wrote
the
green
light?
What
our
approach
would
be
because
if
it
is
viability,
yes,
that's
a
different
conversation,
but
I
think
you
know
we
do
routinely
bring
policy
proposals
or
or
lists
or
ideas,
scrub
them
with
you
and
then
go
do
more
work.
L
So
again,
if
it
is
the
existing
list
and
reaching
out
to
other
agencies
for
for
additional
capacity
and
bringing
those
to
you
that
part,
you
know
can
be
done
by
the
end
of
the
year.
If
and
and
that's
what
I
believe,
the
request
was
that's
what
we
would
believe
the
request
was,
which
is
why
it
was
a
green
light,
but
we
did
want
to
clarify
for
rules
and
set
the
expectation
on
what
that
analysis
would
be,
that
it's
feasibility,
not
viability.
B
Okay-
and
I
I
I
think,
I'm
confused
as
well,
because
I
think
with
what
you're
saying
then
I'm
comfortable
with
that,
especially
if
staff
is
saying
hey,
we
can
go
and
scrub
that
list
and
see
if
we
can't
update,
but
that
doing
much
more
extensive
work
would
require
more
obviously,
more
resources,
more
staff
time
and
so
I'll.
Ask
councilmember
mayhem,
maybe
to
clarify
what
it
is
that
he.
If
you
know
what
he'd
like
to
see
staff,
do.
T
Sure
I'd
be
happy
to
I.
I
think
it
would
be
a
real
mistake
to
say
that
our
approach
is
to
wait
for
individual
council
members
to
identify
one-off
sites
individually
and
bring
them
forward
individually
and
continue
with
a
piecemeal
approach.
T
What
I'm
suggesting
is
that
the
city
manager
be
directed
to
come
back
by
the
end
of
the
year
with
six
sites
for
which
we
will
apply
for
homekeepers,
and
that
can
include
that's
where
the
request
to
other
public
agencies
for
potential
sites
comes
in.
It's
also
a
timing
issue.
These
home
key
funds
are
going
to
disappear
and
we're
going
to
miss
our
opportunity.
T
So
I
am
explicitly
arguing
against
waiting
on
individual
council
members
or
waiting
for
priority
setting.
I
think
we
ought
to.
We
have
done
the
unit.
We've
done
a
lot
of
analysis.
There
may
be
a
little
more
that's
required.
I'm
I'm
just
focused
on
the
outcome.
I
would
like
the
city
manager-
and
I
hope
the
council
will
support
this-
to
come
back
by
the
end
of
the
year
to
say
the
and
if
we
want
to
change
six
sites
to
five
or
ten
or
we
want
to
say
a
thousand
units,
I'm
open
it's
about
an
outcome.
T
Let's
identify
the
next
tranche
that
we're
going
to
apply
for
so
that
we
get
to
some
scale
and
speed.
So
we
have
a
shot
at
starting
to
turn.
Turn
the
corner
on
our
street
homelessness
crisis.
It's
not
about
building
more
lists.
It's
about
the
outcome.
What
are
we
gonna
apply
to
homekeep
for
or
are
we
gonna
miss?
Are
we
just
gonna
miss
it
and
let
let
other
cities
address
their
street
homelessness
crisis,
that's
kind
of
where
I'm
at
on
this.
I
hope
that's
clear.
B
R
R
Four
of
them
are
hotels
and
one
is
an
eih
site.
I
should
clarify
that
homekey
is
designed
for
and
prioritizes
hotel
motel
acquisition
that
eih
sites
are
actually
a
second
tier
priority
in
the
home
key
application,
even
with
our
five
sites
that
we're
applying
to.
R
We
think
our
our
region,
which
gets
about
200
million
for
home
key
sites,
just
san
jose's
application
alone,
with
our
five
existing
sites.
We
think
the
home
key
funds
will
be
over
subscribed.
B
Just
as
a
simple
response,
though,
because
I
do
recognize
we're
pushing
up
against
five
o'clock
here,
which
so
I
believe
from
what
councilmember
mayhem
stated
he'd
like
to
see
as
an
outcome
it
just
it
sounds
like
we're.
We
are
doing
that.
That
is
fully
your
intent
within
housing
to
take
advantage
of
these
funds
based
on
the
information
we
have
today
and
that
quite
frankly,
I
think
that,
although
I
would
agree
there,
maybe
is
some
value
to
the
analysis
he's
asking
for.
B
I
don't
think
that's
actually
going
to
help
you
to
achieve
the
goal
of
utilizing
the
state
resources
that
they
have
today
and
that
you
will
absolutely
you're
doing
that
now
and
that
we
have
comp.
We
should
have
confidence
that
you're
going
to
take
advantage
of
that.
We're
not
going
to
be
somehow
missing
out
as
councilmember
mayhem,
states
to
other
cities.
B
Okay,
thank
you.
So
I
appreciate
it
and
I
I
recognize
again
that
the
time
so
I
will
I
will
will
rest
for
my
other
colleagues
to
speak,
but
I'm
not
going
to
be
able
to
to
support
this
direction.
I'm
happy
to,
I
think,
look
at
this.
If
councilman
mayhem
wants
to
wants
to
retool
what
it
is
that
you
know
he's
looking
for
and
if
indeed
it's
going
to
be
asking
for
an
update
to
that
list
that
can
help
us
for
future
projects.
B
I
think
that's
something
maybe
worthwhile
to
do
the
local
preference,
as
we
saw
in
the
early
response
form,
does
already
exist,
and
I
think
our
I
have
confidence.
Our
housing
staff
is
already
set
out
to
do
exactly
what,
as
he's
asked
for
really
it's
the
outcome,
that's
exactly
the
outcome
that
they're
they're
striving
to
do
now.
We
will
be
taking
advantage
of
the
state's
funding
on
the
short
timeline
that
we
have
now
and
I
look
forward
to
those
projects
and
programs
coming
in
front
of
the
council.
T
R
So
if
there
is
another
home
key
application
next
year,
yep
we
could
take,
you
know
certainly
be
working
on
future
eih
sites.
Now,
as
you
say,
council
members.
T
T
R
M
Thank
you
megan
and
councilmember
man.
I
actually
we're
starting
to
get
up
against
the
clock,
so
I
need
to
get
the
other
council
members
to
have
their
voices
heard
so
councilmember
davis.
P
P
So
I
appreciate
that-
and
I
just
want
to
say
you
know,
council,
member
mayhem
when
we
when
we
say
you're
new,
we're,
not
saying
you
don't
know
anything,
we're
not
saying
we're,
not
saying
you
don't
have
anything
to
add
we're
trying
to
give
you
a
perspective
that
maybe
we've
been
through
it
a
little
bit
and
we've
been
in
the
trenches.
So
when
you're
saying
you're
asking
for
a
list
we've
been
through
that
and
and
that
list
got
publicized
and
there
were
about-
I
think
it
was
99
for
some
reason.
P
I
think
the
number
was
99
sites
that
was
listed
and
the
community
exploded
and
we
ended
up
not
really
getting
much
out
of
that.
But
since
then,
so
that's
why.
I
think
I
as
soon
as
I
see
a
list
of
sites,
I
I
immediately
I
tense
up
and
I
think
is
that
really
going
to
do
any
good.
P
We
already
have
mayberry
bridge
housing,
community,
felipe
bridge
housing,
community,
monterey
at
bernal,
roof,
ferrari,
emergency
interim
evans,
lane
emergency
housing,
those
all
all
told,
are
close
to
400
beds
or
people
and
the
guadalupe
emergency
interim
housing,
which
is
the
la
e
site,
which
I
think
is
coming
to
us
soon.
It
would
add
another
76,
so
that
takes
us
to
almost
500
and-
and
I'm
not
saying
that's
enough
at
all,
but
I
am
saying
that
I
know
from
experience
for
my
own
site:
that's
in
there.
So
we've
got
in
this
list.
P
It
really
does
take
the
council
member
to
have
leadership
in
their
district
to
talk
about
the
site
or
sites
and
to
have
to
have
this
driven
by
staff
is
actually
I
would,
I
would
venture
to
say
it
was
counterproductive
when
it
happened
before,
because
everybody
went
crazy
about
now,
there's
going
to
be
homeless
sites
in
my
neighborhood
and
I
haven't
had
any
input.
What
what
we
did
instead
for
for
my
site
is
we've.
P
We
had
this
discussion
for
frankly,
it
was
multiple
years
to
talk
about
what
it
would
look
like
and
it
looked
different
from
what
the
proposal
was
before.
I
was
a
council
member
to
what
we
ended
up
with
I'm
not
saying
every
conversation
has
to
take
years,
but
it
does
take
the
leadership
of
the
council
office,
and
I
know
that
housing
has
worked
differently
since
then,
with
each
individual
council
office
when
they
identify
a
site
and
they've
also
listened
to
me
as
a
council
member,
I'm
sure
others.
P
That's
the
part
that
really
gave
me
pause
in
addition
to
bringing
up
the
fairgrounds
again.
I
honestly,
I
feel
like
it's
a
red
herring.
If
the
if
the
county
was
going
to
do
more
on
that
site,
they
would
have
already
done
it
all.
That
said,
I'd
like
to
hear
from
you
reagan
or
lee
about
the
community
plan
and
homelessness
and
what
the
discussions
are
at
the
county
and
and
with
other
agencies
on
the
different
strategies,
including,
I
think
it's
strategy,
three,
which
is
our
home
key
and
our
interim
housing
sites.
Is
that
correct?
R
For
the
the
discussions
have
been,
you
know
we're
we're
trying
to
balance
very
important
priorities
and
our
first
and
foremost
priority
is
building
permanent,
deeply
affordable
housing.
Yet
at
the
same
time
we
know
there
are
thousands
of
people
on
the
streets
suffering
right
now,
and
so
our
community
plan
also
calls
for
doubling
the
amount
of
crisis
response
or
emergency
shelter
type
beds,
whether
that's
emergency
interim
housing,
tiny
homes,
safe
parking,
shelter,
beds,
it's
all
countable.
So
our
goal
is
adding
about
2,
000,
more
emergency
type
beds
or
emergency
interim
housing.
R
I
think
once
once
and
san
jose,
I
think
we
are
fine
committing
to
about
a
thousand
of
that,
since
we
are
obviously
the
biggest
city
in
the
county,
but
we
have
thought
about
once
we
go
over
that
and
over
extend
on
emergency
programs
or
emergency
interim
housing.
Then
we
may
start
to
eat
into
the
funding
that
we
have
for
the
real
solution,
which
is
permanent,
affordable
housing.
R
So
we've
really
been
trying
to
strike
a
balance
with
staying
the
course
of
prioritizing
and
building
permanent,
deeply
affordable
housing,
but
also
yes,
we
do
want
to
build.
You
know
these
more
emergency.
Interim
housing
communities,
but
again
it
has
to
be
a
balance
and
we
need
to
pay
for
emergency
interim
housing
services
and
operations.
And
we
do
not
have
an
ongoing
funding
source
identified
and.
P
The
federal
funds
that
are
the
federal
funds
that
are
being
talked
about
now
is
that
just
for
kind
of
the
hardware,
not
the
software
of
the
services.
R
So
as
of
now
there's
no,
there
are
not
vouchers
available
for
emergency
interim
housing.
The
way
we
are
constructing
them.
We
are
building
them
to
meet
housing
quality
standards
so
that
in
the
future,
if,
if
vouchers
become
available,
we
would
obviously
want
to
utilize
them,
but
right
now
and
for
the
foreseeable
future,
there
are
not
any
vouchers
available.
P
Okay,
and
do
you
have,
I
guess
we,
the
local
preference
aspect
of
this-
is
something
that
we're
already
doing
for
the
sites
that
we
fund
ourselves
correct.
R
They
all
act
like
emergency
shelter,
an
emergency
shelter
does
not.
It
does
not
operate
from
a
coordinated
entry
system
where
we're
taking
the
most
vulnerable
who
are
prioritized,
so
we
do
do
that
already
for
those
sites.
R
Okay,
it
is
when
you
get
into
projects
like
permanent,
supportive
housing
that
are
funded
by
hud
funds
or
vouchers
where
we
do
not.
It's
been
more
complicated
to
offer
a
local
preference.
P
Right
understood
and
in
terms
of
asking
other
agencies
about
their
sites,
I
assume
you
don't
need
a
motion
to
do
that.
P
P
They
were
sites
that
came
up
and
now
that
we've
had
we
have
sites
on
caltrans
property.
Caltrans
has
seen
what
we've
done.
They
may
be
more
more
willing
to
to
sign
additional
mous,
so
I
think
it's
I
think
it's
worth
having
those
conversations,
but
it's
probably
worth
having
those
conversations
with
our
representatives
as
opposed
to
caltrans.
Specifically
and
again,
I
would,
I
would
say
you
know,
including
the
council
members
for
those
sites,
would
probably
be
helpful
in
because
I
know
when
we
ask
the
water
district
what
sites
they
have
available.
P
P
So
I
think,
having
that
discussion
about
hey,
can
you
give
us
a
list
is
not
as
as
is
not
as
productive
as
a
council
member
talk,
as
you
have
done,
council
member
mayhem,
talking
about
specific
sites
and
saying
hey
what
about
this,
one,
that
one
or
this
other
and
then
and
then
bringing
it
to
staff
the
the
flip
side
doesn't
work
asking
caltrans
that
they're
or
asking
other
agencies
their
answer.
Is
you
know
the
easy
answer
is
to
to
say
we
don't
have
anything
because
then
it
doesn't
cost
them
any
time.
P
T
All
the
work-
I
don't
agree
with
that-
I
I
don't
disagree
with
that.
I
really,
I
think,
there's
nothing
in
my
memo
that
would
preclude
the
city
manager
from
working
with
each
of
those
council
members
on
potential
sites,
I'm
simply
trying
to
make
sure
we
line
up
viable
applications
for
early
next
year.
P
Yeah
and
I-
and
I
think
that
you
know
they're
they're
feverishly
working
on
this
year's
applications
and
they're
they've,
already
said
that
they
don't
need
a
motion
to
to
go
through
those
lists
and
and
to
ask
other
agencies-
and
I
know
that
working
with
the
council
offices
is,
is
what
you
do
reagan
and
I
get
texts
from
jackie
about
specific
questions
frequently.
M
Thank
you,
councilmember
councilmember
arenas
go
ahead.
K
Thank
you,
I'm
one
of
those
I
represent
a
district
that
does
not
have
and
that
I'm
not
proud
of,
and
I've
acknowledged
this
in
past
years,
as
we've
been
having
conversations
with
the
housing
department
to
determine.
Where
else
can
we
place.
K
Emergency
interim
housing
and
as
well
as
you
know,
I
don't
have
any
affordable
housing
transitional
housing.
K
I
think
I
have
one
one
site
and
the
rest
of
my
district
creates
naturally
occurring
affordable
housing,
which
typically
looks
like
three
families
per
a
single
family
home
which
is
not
is
not
optimal,
but
that's
what
people
are
doing,
if
I
recall
collect
correctly.
K
I
think
from
the
last
time
that
that
we
had
received
some
information
from
the
county,
and
this
is
something
that
I
have
asked
before
or
make
points
on
it
is
that
a
lot
of
the
times
we
don't
see
the
people
that
are
most
vulnerable
and
that
is
our
children
and
they're,
usually
accompanied
by
women,
and
I
know
that
from
past
county
information,
I
think
it
was
51
percent,
that
of
women
who
are
homeless,
there's
51
percent
and
of
that
51
41
of
them
have
minors
in
their
care,
and
so
for
me,
I've
always
pushed
and
you'll
always
hear
me
pushing
for
a
family,
centered
approach.
K
We
learned
our
lessons
with
safe
parking
for
families
actually
in
d7,
and
something
that
I
I
prompted
and
I
propelled
with
the
housing
department
so
that
we
could
answer
the
call
it
didn't
work
out.
I
I
got
pushed
back
from
the
community,
and
rightly
so,
because
that
area
is
already
prolific
with.
K
Litter
and
crime,
and
just
overburdening
and
under
resourced
from
fire
police
non-profits.
K
You
got
it
they're
under
resourced,
and
so
I
I
you
know,
I
didn't
like
it,
because
I
wanted
to
offer
something
for
our
families,
but
I
understood
that
families
need
something
quite
different,
and
so,
when
I
met
with
the
housing
department,
when
I
met
with
jackie
and
reagan,
you
all
offered
hotels
as
the
alternative,
and
this
is
what
families
are
asking
for:
anyways
that
came
from
them
and
you
have
your
ear
to
the
ground
in
terms
of
what
our
homeless
population
needs,
and
so
this
is
actually
something
that
I've
been
focused
on.
K
If
we
were
going
to
sorry
I'm
running
out
of
battery
and
I'm
trying
to
get
to
an
outlet
before
it,
it
kicks
me
off.
Okay,
thank
you,
and
so
we
we
shifted.
We
shifted
our
focus
and
and
had
a
little
bit
more
target
in
terms
of
what
we
could
offer.
Families
as
vouchers
for
for
hotels
and
this
home
key
for
me
is,
is
an
additional
resource
for
those
families.
K
That
is
a
priority
and
from
what
I
understand
talking
with
jackie
and
chairing
the
neighborhood
services
and
education
committee,
I
know
that
the
eih
is
secondary.
Primary
is,
is
really
getting
people
into
somewhere
building.
Something
at
this
point
is
not
going
to
get
us
out
of
the
water
that
we're
in,
and
so
I'm
wondering
what
what
message
did
you
get?
First
of
all,
did
you
meet
with
jackie
and
what
message
did
jackie?
I
don't
see
jackie
here
I
think
she's
not
available,
and
so
what
what
was
the
message
that.
K
T
I
think
that
I
think
that
with
prefabricated
modular,
the
units
we're
seeing
are
of
pretty
high
quality
and
can
be
suitable
for
longer
term
stay
and
for
eventually
applying
for
federal
vouchers,
and
I
think
they
can
be
stacked,
and
I
just
I
think
they
can
be
at
least
semi-permanent,
and
I
I
think
she
and
I
don't
totally
agree
on.
T
Maybe
on
all
those
points,
although
I
think
I
would
say
I
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
her,
I
mean
I
think
we
had
a
really
good
conversation,
but
you
know
I
certainly
learned
things
from
her
and-
and
I
also
there's
some
areas
where
we
don't
totally
agree.
K
K
I
didn't
like
that
message
necessarily
because
I'm
trying
to
solve
for
something
that
I
see
as
a
problem,
but
I
also
understand
that
there
is
inequities
in
terms
of
housing
among
the
different
districts,
and
I
know
that
our
our
housing
department
is
working
on
a
siding
policy
and
I
know
that
it
has
more
reference
to
do
with
affordable
housing
and
market
rate
housing,
but
at
the
at
the
core
of
that
is
distinguishing
re,
rich
resource
neighborhoods,
and
so
along
with
that,
with
that,
if
we,
if
we
guide
our
conversations
with
our
and
and
in
parallel
to
the
citing
policy,
we
have
to
take
a
look
at
where
is
there
a
a
rich
resource?
K
Neighborhood,
and
these
are
probably
the
more
target.
These
are
the
areas
that
make
sense
for
our
community
according
to
research,
according
to
our
housing
department,
and
so
for
me,
I
I
think
it's
always
healthy
to
have
a
difference
of
opinion.
I
have
quite
a
bit
of
difference
of
opinions
with
my
colleagues
all
the
time
and
we
get
through
it,
but
but
in
the
end
I
know
that
we
all
want
the
same
thing
and
we
and
we
want
to
propose
it
in
a
and
we
want
to
propose
our
solutions
in
different
ways
it.
K
For
me.
It
didn't
feel
good
at
all
to
get
pushed
back
on
my
safe
parking
project,
but
I
understood
that
there's
a
bigger
target
here
and
there's
a
bigger
goal
and
that
is
to
comply
with
what
our
families
actually
need
and
so
from
what
I
understand
and
from
what
I
heard
from
reagan
and
what
I've
talked
with
jackie
in
the
past.
K
Homekey
is
set
for
hotels
and
I'm
going
to
support
that
continue
to
support
that.
I
think
it's
too
late
at
this
point.
Anyways,
and
so
the
next
conversation
would
be
next
year,
and
I
don't
want
to
preempt
the
council
on
the
conversation
in
terms
of
maybe
maybe
we
I
don't
know
what
our
strategy
will
be,
and
I
don't
want
this
this
committee
to
decide
for
the
rest
of
the
council.
K
What
that
homekey
funding
strategy
or
proposal
will
look
like,
so
I
also
am
not
going
to
support
this.
We
need
immediate
housing.
K
We
also,
more
importantly,
need
to
prevent
people
from
being
unhoused,
and
so
getting
the
word
out
about
the
state,
funding
and
rental
assistance
and
legal
assistance
is
for
me
the
utmost
priority
and
I
will
follow
typically
generally.
K
K
I
may
not
always
agree
with
them,
but
I
here
in
this
housing
department,
I
have
put
my
faith
into
her
housing
department
because
they
understand
what
our
community
is
and
they
are
responding
to
it
in
the
moment,
really
in
the
moment
and
they've
grown
they've
grown
from
when
I
first
started,
it
was
all
the
focus
was
all
just
development
and
not
really
service
oriented
and-
and
this
is
a
completely
different
housing
department
than
when
I
first
started,
and
so
we
are
partners
in
addressing
this
crisis.
K
We're
not
we're
not
the
only
partners,
and
they
know
this,
and
so
we
play
a
part,
and
our
part
right
now
is
to
prevent
homelessness
with
some
of
these
rental
assistance
vouchers.
Our
priority
is,
is
to
have
immediate
housing
for
our
folks
who
are
unhoused,
and
I'm
I'm
going
to
also
ask
that
in
the
future
we
we
need
to
know.
The
rules
committee
needs
to
know
that
this
is.
This
has
been
vetted
with
the
department
head
and
lee.
K
I
you
know,
I'm
I'm
not
sure
that
this
was,
and
so
I
think
for
the
next
proposal
or
project
or
memo
that
comes
in.
K
I
really
like
to
see
more
vetting
from
our
that
particular
department
head,
because
it
it
would
save
us
from
some
time
and
then
allow
for
a
direct
conversation
with
the
council
member
and
that
director.
So
I
appreciate
the
the
the
memo.
I
appreciate
the
efforts
and-
and
I
know
we
we're
all
trying
we're
all
on
the
same
team
and
we're
all
trying
to
support
our
community
in
the
very
different
ways,
and
so
I
appreciate
the
memo
appreciate
the
efforts.
M
No,
we
wouldn't
vote
if
there's
no
motion
right.
So
are
you
finished
councilmember
race.
M
Councilmember
man,
obviously
you
can
you've,
gathered
the
sentiment
for
the
committee
and
I
can
imagine
it's.
You
know
very
disappointing
a
couple
of
points
I
want
to
make,
and
I
want
to
reiterate
what
my
colleagues
already
said
is
that
you
know
it's
no
disrespect.
M
I
understand
exactly
where
you're
coming
from
what
you're
trying
to
accomplish
those
very
same
proposals
are
proposals
that
we've
been
dealing
with
and
working
on
and
trying
to
resolve
the
whole
time.
I've
been
on
the
council
and
the
whole
time
raul's
been
on
the
council,
so
I
just
want
to
just
kind
of
give
you
that
context
of
where
some
of
this
might
be
coming
from
and
and
also
I
I
appreciate
again-
you
know
what
you're
trying
to
accomplish,
but
I
I've
worked.
M
You
know
closely
with
jackie
and
reagan,
and
you
know
they
have
a
lot
of
battle
scars.
Each
project
each
site
is
very
intense.
You
need
to
have
you
know
a
lot
of
community
engagement.
You
need
to
have
a
process
where
the
council,
member,
that's
going
to
be
affected,
is
on
board,
is
helping
drive
the
process,
but
if
you
have
a
situation
where
you
just
produce
a
list
of
sites
again,
we've
seen
this
movie
before.
We
know
how
it
ends
and
it
doesn't
end
well.
M
M
Unfortunately,
for
this
particular
issue,
you
don't
have
a
motion
or
the
votes
to
to
make
that
happen,
but
I
don't
want
you
to
get
discouraged.
You
know
continue
to
work
on
this
process.
You
know
work
closely
with
housing.
You
know
collaborate
with
your
colleagues
who
have
been
through
this
and
and
try
to
figure
out.
You
know
a
different
path
or
a
better
path
or
refined
path
forward.
So
that's
my
that's
my
input
and
advice
to
you.
Councilmember.
T
Yeah,
thank
you
vice
mayor,
no
totally
appreciate
it
and
I'm
I'm
believe
me.
I'm
I'm
not
well
disappointed,
I'm
not
taking
any
of
this.
Personally,
I
appreciate
the
feedback.
My
observation
is
that
the
way
we're
approaching
this
is
is
not
sufficient
to
the
scale
of
the
problem,
and
I
will
I
will
stand
by
my
memo
as
actually
a
slightly
different
approach.
I'm
not
sure
I
articulated
it
clearly
enough
in
the
memo,
but
I
I
am.
T
I
am
trying
to
find
a
way
to
have
us
operate
at
a
different
level
of
speed
and
scale
and
cost
effectiveness
to
have
a
shot
at
ending
street
homelessness,
and,
sadly,
I
think
the
approach
we're
taking
is
not
is
isn't
there
and
I'm
very
open
to
collaboration.
I
appreciate
all
the
feedback
totally
respect.
T
The
concerns
that
have
been
raised
today
hope
hope
we
can
together
find
other
approaches
or
other
solutions,
but
I
I
just
I
am
very
much
not
satisfied
with
the
trajectory
that
we're
on
and
I'm
looking
for
a
way
to
get
greater
speed
and
scale.
I
don't
think
in
any
way
that
precludes
the
city
manager's
office,
even
if
taking
a
more
top-down
approach
or
a
more
comprehensive
approach.
T
A
precludes
manager
from
working
with
individual
council
members
on
individual
sites
or
to
choose
between
a
few
options
in
a
given
district,
but
I
I'm
going
to
continue
to
push
for
scale
and
speed
and
cost
effectiveness,
and
I
think
our
current
approach
simply
doesn't
meet
that
bar
for
me,
so
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna,
continue
to
try
to
make
that
case
and
show
where
I
think
we
could
be
doing
better.
But
I
do
appreciate
the
feedback
and
I
appreciate
the
feedback.
T
I've
gotten
from
staff
on
these
issues
throughout
the
year
as
I've
been
looking
into
the
past
work
we've
done
and
where
we're
at
and
look
forward
to
continuing
the
dialogue.
Thank
you.
M
G
Oh,
thank
you.
Well,
it
was
very
refreshing
to
hear
deb
davis,
my
council
members
say
we
need
to
include
the
neighbors.
We
need
to
have
the
community
involved
and
we're
gonna
get
everybody
involved
and
that's
how
we
go
forward
as
we
get
that
community
involved
and
we
get
public
input
about
how
we're
going
forward,
and
that
is
exactly
what
she
did
not
do
with
our
community
exactly
what
the
council
has
not
done
with
our
neighborhood
and
exactly
what
the
city
hasn't
done,
that
they
have.
G
They
have
decided
that
jobs
are
more
important
because
they
make
more
money.
The
city,
the
city
coffers,
the
city,
pockets,
make
more
money
from
jobs
and
not
the
residents,
and
so
we're
saying
it's
not
important
housing.
That's
really
what
the
city
has
been
saying.
Housing
is
not
a
crucial
issue,
though.
I
appreciate
what
matt
mahan
is
saying.
G
He
says
it
is
and
he's
right
and
and
we're
only
it's
only
going
to
get
worse
the
on-house
issue
as
climate
refugees
throng
into
our
neighborhood,
and
so
this
is
what
we're
having
to
do
and
she
is
not
doing
it.
She
didn't
do
it
with
our
hotel.
It
hasn't
happened
with
the
whole
whole
general
plan
of
our
community
was
not
included
about
putting
a
hotel
in
our
neighborhood.
G
That
was
not
decided
by
our
community
and
and
yet
she
says,
that's
what
needs
to
happen
and
it's
truly
what
needs
to
happen
and
everything
needs
to
change
because
it
didn't
happen.
We
didn't
include
our
neighborhood.
When
you
decide
the
general
plan
would
take,
the
commercial
would
take
any
residential
properties.
Well,
we
were
zoned
residential
to
begin
with.
That's
how
my
property,
which
was
originally
a
bar,
was
turned
into
residential
and
then
the
city
came
and
said:
no,
all
the
properties
that
are
commercially
stayed
commercial
and
there
was
no
discussion
about
it.
G
J
J
J
J
Help
us
by
helping
us
mobilize
to
put
pressure
on
our
county
to
fully
leverage
their
land,
their
resources,
their
income,
their
staff,
I'm
not
sure
that
having
the
city
manager
and
maybe
some
of
your
council
people
contact,
the
county
is
going
to
be
as
successful
as
getting
a
thousand
two
thousand
five
thousand
ten
thousand
people
contacting
our
county
supervisors
and
putting
pressure
on
them.
Please
help
us
mobilize.
J
We
want
the
solution,
we
want
to
work
with
you.
We
want
to
leverage
all
of
the
community
and
all
of
the
agencies
that
it
could
include
the
county
may
get
tell
us
how
to
put
pressure
on
corsaisi
or
whoever
else
to
get
caltrans
to
work
on
this
issue
help
us
help
you
solve
the
problem
again.
Thank
you.
So
much,
I'm
looking
forward
to
you
energizing
us
as
a
community
to
solve
our
homeless
problem.
F
Hi,
thank
you,
claire
beekman.
Here,
thanks
for
the
meeting
today,
a
reminder,
I
hope
we
can
talk,
continue
to
talk
about
good,
open,
democratic
practices
that
are
positive
and
hopeful
and
good
agenda
items
throughout
this
fall.
I
hope
we
can
continue
to
talk
about
new
ideas,
how
to
talk
about
the
vaccine
process
and
how
it
can
be
safe
and
understandable
and
and
to
be
creative
in
in
other
choices,
besides
the
vaccine,
if
necessary,
and
explain
exactly
why.
Why
is
the
vaccine
of
such
good
value
for
ourselves?
F
That
could
be
important
goals
for
this
fall?
What
else?
Oh
yeah?
I
have
a
real
problem
in
speaking
about
renewable
energy
ideas
and
how
important
they
are.
We
can
work
on
this
time
and
local
procurement
ideas
at
this
time.
If
we
do
those
two
things,
I
think
we'll
be
in
much
better
shape.
If
we
have
any
upcoming
natural
disasters
in
the
next
decade
and
we
transition,
we
can
then
transition
out
of
that
difficult
time
period
back
to
our
our
bright
good
future.
It's
not
the
other
way
around.
F
We
have
to
practice
our
good
practices
now,
get
them
ready,
get
them
in
order
and
and
know
what
we're
doing
and
we'll
just
be
so
much
better
prepared
after
future
disaster
events
to
conclude
with
council
person,
mayhem's
words
today,
you
know
I'm
really.
I've
been
talking
all
these
months
now
about
upcoming
transitional
housing,
subsidy
programs,
those
really
tie
into
the
home
first
key,
first,
whatever
room
first
plans.
That
sounds
like
the
same
sort
of
thing
that
you
know
transitional
housing
is
about
to
make
an
incredible
change
in
our
future.
F
S
Thank
you
everybody
good
evening.
Excuse
me
scott
largent.
I
I
actually
enjoyed
the
meeting
today.
Normally
I
I've
been
very
frustrated
with
the
council,
so
I
have
not
really
been
attending.
Sometimes
I
put
the
headphones
on
and
listen
at
work,
but
I
just
worry
that
everything
falls
on
deaf
ears
kind
of
been
around
that
that
that
track
plenty
of
times.
S
I
I
enjoyed
what
matt
had
to
say
today
and
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
word
this.
Don't
let
them
bully
you
into
a
corner
mat.
Their
ways
have
not
worked
for
a
very
very
long
time
and
I
have
a
feeling
some
interesting
articles
will
be
written
about
this
meeting
and
I
don't
support
any
of
you,
council
members,
but
I
actually
support
matt
now
and
I
like
the
direction
that
you're
going.
S
I
like
what
you're
doing
you're
willing
to
have
the
conversation,
and
this
is
the
biggest
problem
in
silicon
valley
right
now,
you're
taking
it
head
on,
and
I
would
just
suggest,
don't
listen
to
these
other
muppets
up
on
these
panels.
I'm
telling
you
their
ways:
don't
work
they've
given
up
on
the
people
on
the
streets.
S
Okay,
just
like
we're
watching
this
massive
disaster
play
out
over
here
in
this
crash
zone,
we
need
true
leadership,
but
we
need
new
leadership
and
it's
not
these
old
ways.
Right
now,
I
I'm
actually
pretty
upset
at
listening
to
some
of
you
today.
You
know
matt
is
it's
new
eyes,
a
fresh
perspective
right
now
and
keep
doing
it
bud.
You
have
my
support
and
if
there's
any
of
my
research
that
I've
done
all
these
years,
I'd
be
more
than
willing
to
sit
down
with
you
and
help.
S
You
succeed
on
this
because
these
other
council
members,
they
don't
care,
and
it's
obvious
when
you
look
out
on
the
streets
right
now.
It
is
obvious
the
suffering
that
goes
on
right
now
in
silicon
valley
in
san
jose.
It
is
shameful
and
thank
you
matt,
for
pushing
this
forward
and
trying
just
keep
doing
it.
You're
going.
O
Yes,
I
I
thought
the
phrase
elected
leaders
was,
I
thought
it
had
some
meaning,
but
it
does
not.
We
have
elected
followers
in
our
city
council,
the
only
person
I
truly
respect
and
follow
today
and
listen
to
and-
and
he
makes
so
much
sense
is
matt
mahan
the
rest.
I
hope
that
I
looks
like
only
two
of
you
are
on
here
now,
but
I
hope
the
rest
of
the
council
members
are
listening
to
this.
Listening
to
our
comments,
you
guys
are
shameful.
O
There's
a
better
way
to
do
this.
The
definition
of
insanity
we
always
know-
we've
heard
this
cliche
phrase,
millions
of
times
keep
doing
it.
What
you've
still
been
doing,
so
it's
not
working
guys
and
gals.
It's
not
you
guys
are
caving
into
the
nimbies
you're
not
doing
what
is
right.
What
is
just
what
is
humane,
stop
doing,
stop
kicking
the
can
down
the
road.
Something
has
got
to
change.
O
There
needs
to
be
leadership,
I'm
hoping
if
there's
unhoused
advocates
out
there
that
are
interested
in
making
a
getting
a
coalition
going.
We
need
a
coalition
now
more
than
ever,
because
we
need
to
stand
up
against
these
elected
of
followers
and
find
some
candidates
that
will
do
with
the
right
to
do.
The
right
thing.
San
jose
is:
has
the
worst
housing
crisis?
O
It's
a
disaster
in
the
nation,
shameful
you
guys.
Your
legacy
is
resting
on
your
decisions
today,
stop
doing
what
you've
been
doing
for
all
these
decades.
For
all
the
time
you've
been
in
in
office
yourselves,
thank
goodness,
matt
mahan
had
the
backbone
to
come
up
and
say
what
is
right,
what
needs
to
be
done?
O
N
Hi,
thank
you.
First
of
all
I
want
to.
This
is
my
first
meeting
attending.
Actually,
my
second,
I
did
attend
something
else,
for
some
school
is
the
first
time
that
I
stay
all
the
way
to
the
back,
because
I'm
personally
very
impacted
by
the
decision
for
the
foreground
thing.
I
do
not
think
that
we
need
to
resort
to
insulting
anybody
on
the
council.
I
think
that
everybody
had
come
up
with
great
ideas.
I
was
entirely.
N
I
am
still
entirely
opposing
councilman
mayhem's
proposal,
just
because
the
way
that
it
was
worth
it,
it
was
stating
basically
6
000
people
in
my
backyard
and
this.
Obviously,
when
you
see
that
picture,
it
actually
caused
your
attention
and
probably
more
work
should
have
been
put
in
making
that
a
little
bit
clearer,
because
what
was
exciting.
M
This
is
sorry
for
for
interrupting,
but
we
already
right
debated
that
issue
and
you
commented
on
on
that
issue
open
forum.
I
know
you're
new
to
the
meetings
so
right.
N
So,
just
to
appreciate
everybody's
cordial
work,
I
think
that
congress,
congressman
councilman
mayhem,
gave
a
good
explanation
and
I
do
I
do
support
his
point
of
the
fact
that
something
needs
to
be
done
and
we
cannot
wait
for
too
long.
So
we
need
to
come
up
with
aggressive
and
important
measures
that
are
going
to
address
this
issue
on
a
large
scale
and
the
my
issue
is
the
distribution.
N
Obviously,
so
I
appreciate
that
the
explanation
and
I
think
that
his
point
should
be
actually
really
noted-
that
we
need
to
be
more
aggressive
with
this
kind
of
measures,
and
I
think
that
the
conversation
was
cordial
and
the
comments
were
impassioned,
but
I
think
it's
important
also
to
hear
the
community
that
lives
in
the
area
because
they're
impacted
their
daily
lives
are
actually
impacted,
and
this
is
an
issue
that
affects
everybody.
So
everybody,
thank
you
very
much
for
for
this
discussion
and
I've
learned
a
lot.
So
I
appreciate
it.
I
Well,
I
still
thoroughly
disagree
with
anything
that
puts
people
together
in
a
large
scale
or
removes
them
from
the
neighborhoods
that
they
live
in.
I
do
agree
that
we
need
to
take
like
much
bolder
action
and
stop
doing
things
that
are
like
pilot
programs
and
things
like
that.
I
don't
support
things
that
take
longer
than
a
couple
months,
because
we've
had
almost
160
people
die
out
there
this
year
and
that's
almost
our
total
death
rate
for
last
year.
I
So
we
can't
do
things
like
that.
We
just
can't
keep
talking
about
things
and
we
can't
keep
saying
we're
building
something
wait,
wait!
Wait
because
when
we
wait,
people
die
and
speaking
of
dying,
we've
got
all
these
elderly
and
disabled
folks
at
the
surest
day
that
have
lived
there
and
they
were
put
there
because
they
were
the
most
fragile
people
and
put
there
during
when
the
pandemic
started
and
they've
thrived.
Their
medical
conditions
are
better.
I
Their
mental
health
is
better
and
now
we're
putting
them
out,
because
we
created
some
other
program
that
it's
permanent,
affordable
housing.
Has
anybody
ever
even
heard
of
permanent,
affordable
housing?
No,
it
was
just
created
there
as
a
way
to
put
these
people
out
on
the
street,
and
that's
not
right.
Somebody
has
to
do
something
to
save
the
people.
At
the
surest
day,
it
is
putting
out
these
people
who
are
protected
and
have
thrived
mentally
and
physically,
while
at
the
surest
day
it's
ridiculous
to
put
these
people
out
on
the
street.