►
Description
City of San José, California
Joint meeting of Rules and Open Government / Committee of the Whole of February 3, 2021
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=831786&GUID=B79BDA42-7829-40BB-9CB8-AF1838FDACBC
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
C
C
E
F
F
F
Seniors,
disabled
and
workers
who
had
to
get
up
early
quite
frankly,
dropped
off
our
speaker
list.
This
placement
of
issues
critical
to
underrepresented
groups,
so
late
in
the
agenda,
prevents
the
council
from
hearing
their
voices.
Another
example
about
three
years
ago,
mobile
home
folks,
were
kept
waiting
for
over
two
hours.
There
was
a
young
woman
of
color
sitting
next
to
me
with
a
baby.
The
baby
was
good
for
about
two
hours
and
then
it
started
fussing
not
screaming
not
yelling,
but
fussing.
F
A
security
guard
came
up
and
told
her
that
she
was
going
to
have
to
leave.
She
could
not
afford
child
care.
She
had
to
leave
that
meeting
and
she
could
not
give
her
input.
There's
a
feeling
in
the
community
that
the
council
does
this
deliberately
to
prevent
voices
on
controversial
issues.
I
do
not
share
that
view.
I
think
it
is
due
to
an
insensitivity
on
the
part
of
some
councils
and
some
mayors.
F
C
G
Thanks
for
your
work
and
understandings
from
from
all
sides,
with
your
eviction
moratorium,
he
passed
last
night
to
simply
practice
how
to
make
clear
and
to
offer
again
kobe
19
seems
to
be
a
man-made
creation
made
up
and
planned
by
an
elite
select
few
everyday
people
should
not
have
to
be
blamed
and
then
held
to
its
debt
burden.
It
is
from
this
thinking,
along
with
the
belief
of
urgent
emergency
needs.
We
seem
to
have
agreed
as
a
society
to
cover
about
80
percent
of
rent
and
forgiveness
ideas
at
this
time.
G
How
do
we
organize
understand
and
convince
ourselves?
There
are
safe
financial
and
funding
plans
that
can
cover
the
final
20
percent
to
speak
to
vta
bus
station
issues
as
I've
spoken
before.
That's
item
2.13
bus
advertising,
as
I've
spoken
before,
I
hope
the
bta
will
establish
some
sort
of
advertising
ethics
review
board
and
public
process
review
for
any
new
large
advertising
that
is
placed
in
the
future
of
vta
transit
hubs.
I
ask
we
learn
how
to
keep
out
offensive
advertising
and
advertising
that
does
not
work
towards
the
ideas
of
equity,
reimagine
and
peace.
F
Hi,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
hi.
My
name
is
glenna
halcroft
and
I'm
one
of
the
residents
in
mobile
home
park
in
district
seven,
and
I
was
at
the
meeting
last
night
talking
about
the
issue
of
rental
freezes
anyway,
there's
a
real
problem
with
I.
I
agree
with
martha
when
she's
talking
about
the
the
you
need
to
have
thing.
F
You
need
to
consider
the
people
that
are
that
are
seniors
parents
with
young
children
and
infants,
disabled
people,
essential
workers
who
can't
stay
there
a
long
time
and
we
didn't
we
weren't
able
to
speak
until
like
11
o'clock
at
night,
and
we
had
people
that
actually
dropped
off
of
the
phone
people
that
had
agreed
that
we're
going
to
speak
and
and
they
didn't
they
weren't
able
to
they
weren't
able
to
stay
on
the
phone.
That
long
and
so
please
take
into
consideration
that
you
know
not.
F
All
of
us
can
stay
up
late
for
one
reason
or
another,
whether
it
be
whether
it
be
somebody
young
with
babies
or
young
children,
or
if
it
be
somebody,
that's
older
and
disabled,
not
everybody
can
keep
long
late
hours
and
if
you
take
more
consideration
more,
be
more
cognizant
of
how
you
line
up
these
these
issues
to
be
covered
in
city
in
the
council
meetings.
That
would
be
much
much
appreciated.
E
I
thank
you
jones,
my
I,
as
a
new
council
member,
I
have
been
observing
council
meetings
for
just
you
know,
participating
for
about
a
month
and
I
just
have
a
kind
of
a
suggestion
for
at
least
from
my
perspective,
for
what
I
think
could
allow
for
a
little
bit
more.
What
I
think
would
be
a
more
debate,
style
or
discussion
style
conversation
during
council
meetings.
E
You
know.
One
council,
member
after
the
other,
is
more
of
a
discussion
as
opposed
to
kind
of
a
long
line
of
council
members
speaking
one
after
the
other.
So
I
I
don't
know
if
anybody
else
agrees
with
that
or
want
or
if
we
want
to
have
that
conversation
now
or
the
future
date.
But
I
I
think,
as
I've
been
observing
the
meetings
I
feel
like.
E
Sometimes
we
end
up
with
council
members,
speaking
long
after
the
other
like
if
I
want
to
say
something
and
I
put
my
hand
up
and
I'm
speaking
an
hour
after
the
person,
I'm
responding
to
it's
sometimes
hard
to
be
able
to
have
that
discussion
with
that
other
council
member.
So
I
think,
if
we
maybe
say
you
know,
put
10-minute
time
limits
and
then
come
back
without
limiting
the
total
time
someone
speaks
but
kind
of
shortening
the
blocks
of
time
that
people
are
speaking.
E
H
I
also
like
to
bring
up
that.
4.1
might
be
one
of
those
topics
in
which
we
will
have
a
lot
of
speakers,
and
we
may
want
to
think
about
having
a
time
certain,
but
I'm
open
to
hearing
from
from
folks.
I
know
our
work
week
is
a
little,
for
us
is
a
little
flexible.
We
don't
really
come
home
at
a
certain
time
because
we're
always
home,
but
there
are
some
folks
who,
literally
you
know
they
just
their
in
real
person
have
at
work
is
somewhere
else.
H
D
H
H
C
H
C
A
C
D
Give
us
a
reality
check
tony
yeah,
I'm
gonna
give
you
a
little
reality
check.
We
do
usually
for
dinner,
break
sometime
between
5
30
and
6
that
half
an
hour
to
an
hour.
So
if
you
have
not
before
six-
and
we
have
you
know-
I
just
wanna-
I
just
wanna
say
we
do
have
a
dinner
break
sometime
in
that
not
before
six,
but
not
after
eight
pm,
although
if
you
start
right
after
the
dinner
break,
it's
probably
not
an
issue,
but
just
wanted
to
make
sure
you
guys
were
thinking
about
that.
C
C
D
D
D
E
E
Okay,
I
mean
I
mean
so
not
before
seven,
then,
if
we
always
are
having
dinner
and
ending
at
seven
and
say
not
before
seven,
because
I
mean,
if
you
think,
there's
a
chance
that
that
would
end
that
we
would
not
be
ready
to
do
it
at
five
and
you
have
people
tune
in
at
five
and
then
you
end
up
going
till
six.
Other
people
take
dinner,
break
that
they've
tuned
in
at
five
and
had
two
hours
wasted
waiting
for
the
item
right.
E
H
I
Other
item
under
your
this
is
nora.
Let
me
just
jump
in
here
for
a
second
just
so
you
have
the
language
under
your
rules
of
conduct
the
time
certain
says
some
items
may
be
listed
on
the
agenda
approved
by
rules
for
a
time
certain
or
not
before
a
certain
time.
Such
listing
means
the
item
is
heard
as
soon
as
reasonably
possible
after
the
specified
time,
but
not
before.
I
E
C
J
So
I
I
like
the
idea
of
doing
kind
of
like
five
minute
in
a
way
kind
of
opening
statements,
and
maybe
that's
all
you
have
and
and
and
then
letting
the
discussion
kind
of
flow
from
there.
I
think
that's
a
great,
I
think
five
minute
increments,
or
maybe
ten
but
five
minute
increments,
is
a
good
way
to
get
through
everybody
in
an
hour
right.
J
I
I
don't
think
it's
something
that
the
mayor
can
decide
you,
you
decided
coming
out
of
rules
a
couple
months
ago
to
try
the
15-minute
shot
clock
for
lack
of
a
better
term
yeah
and,
and
then
that
was
you've
been
following
that,
and
so
I
think
rules
can
put
together
a
a
proposal
and
that
would
be
adopted
by
the
council
may
end
up
in
your
rules
of
conduct.
That
may
be
the
best
place
for
it.
I
I
J
I
J
Yeah,
it
was,
I
think
it
was
discussed
at
the
following
meeting
at
orders
of
the
day
or
something
like
that
right,
okay.
Well,
I'm
I'm
happy
to
support
the
kind
of
the
five
minute
round
robin
idea.
I
think
it's
a
good
one.
Regarding
item
4.1
and
the
time
certain
I
was
looking
at
the
agenda
before
item
4.1.
We
don't
have
there's
there's
one
item.
J
J
A
I
think
you
know
that's
a
great
question
councilmember.
I
think
there's
definitely
some
discussion
there
that
the
council
will
want
to
participate
in,
but
it's
clearly
not
going
to
be
the
length
at
least
what
I
would
believe
of
a
3.1
or
what
we
did
yesterday.
So
I
would
agree
with
you.
The
agenda
seems
somewhat
manageable,
where
you
might
not
be
bumping
up
against
the
dinner
hour
on
this.
J
So
I'm
comfortable
with
the
with
just
doing
a
time
certain
of
five
not
before
5
pm
and
then
we'll
just
take
the
dinner
break
after
that.
And
then
it
looks
like
we'll
come
back
for
land
use,
because
there
are
quite
a
few
general
plan
amendments.
It
looks
like
or
maybe
just
maybe
just
two
looks
like
the
other
ones
are
deferred.
B
Yeah,
thank
you
appreciate
the
discussion
as
well,
and
I
think
you
know
we
have
kicked
these
challenges
around
for
for
some
time
things
like
hearing
items
really
late
in
the
the
evening,
sometimes
just
the
the
basic
setup
of
our
agenda.
We
have
a
traditional
order
right
and
we
were
recognizing
that
before
where
there
are
certain
departments
that
are
at
the
end
of
the
that
order
regularly
and
so
they're
always
kind
of
at
the
end
and
we've
we've
tried
to
be
conscious
of
that.
Sometimes
moving
that
I
don't
know.
B
If
there's
a
I
don't
know,
if
there's
a
perfect
solution
out
there.
I
do
think
that
you
know
if
it's
in
specific
regards
to
a
meeting
or
an
item.
I
think
we
can
address
that
here
at
rules.
If
it's
in
regards
to
time.
You
know,
I
think
limits.
We've
done
that
here
as
well,
that
rules
as
a
suggestion
and
then
the
council
has
taken
it
up
at
orders
of
the
day
as
nora
pointed
out,
and
I
think
that
can
be
done
again
right
here.
B
We
can
sort
of
make
a
suggestion
there,
but
I
think
if
it
goes
deeper
than
that,
where
we're
we're
looking
at
the
dynamic
of
the
conversations,
the
orders
the
time
all
that
you
know
as
councilman
cohen,
was
pointing
out
kind
of
potential
for
back
and
forth
or
whatnot.
I
I
do
think
that's
probably
a
broader
discussion
that
we
would
want
to
agendize
and
and
maybe
discuss
it.
B
I
I
think
it's
worthwhile,
because
certainly
we
we
shouldn't
assume
that
we
have
it
nailed
down
and
and
that
we
should
just
keep
doing
things
the
way
we've
been
doing
things
because
that's
how
we've
been
doing
them-
and
certainly
a
lot
of
you
know,
challenges
that
we've
run
into
in
that
regard,
in
what
we're
gonna
vote
on
now.
So.
B
Okay,
yeah
and
I
I'm
comfortable
with
that
and
kind
of
looking
at
the
agenda
too.
I
think
that
it's
not
going
to
be
as
meaty
one
thing
that
I
think
you
know
we
certainly
we
we
do
this
often
where
we
will
pick.
You
know,
sort
of
a
not
before
time
and
that
doesn't
always
you
know,
work
in
people's
favor
as
we
as
we
see
right
like
this
past
week,
not
before
six
could
mean
11
30
p.m.
B
B
It's
not
perfect
right
because
sometimes
right
we're
we're
on
the
middle
of
an
item
and
and
as
norm
pointed
out
we'll
we'll
sort
of
wait
till
we
conclude
that
item,
so
you
try
to
get
as
close
as
you
can
to
a
time
frame.
I
think
that's
that
provides
a
little
more
certainty,
which
is
good
at
the
end
of
the
day.
You
know
I
don't
know
how
much
certainty
we
could
ever
provide
because
there's
things
like
the
consent
agenda
and
sometimes
we
fly
through
it
other
times.
B
You
know
10
items
get
pulled
off
and
you
know
it
just
makes
it
hard.
I
do
think
one
thing
that
has
been
a
tool
we've
been
utilizing
through
the
pandemic
that
has
been
helpful,
has
been
the
orders
of
the
day
and
moving
consent
after
3.1
and
not
necessarily
kind
of
essentially
saying
hey
3.1
is
so
important
or
we
know
it's
a
long
discussion
right.
We
want
to
get
the
idea
what
was
as
well
early
on
last
year.
B
B
Did
you
hear
something?
11
30
and
not
a
lot
of
people
participate
and
unfortunately
we
can't
hear
everything
between
the
you
know
five
to
eight
time
frame.
It's
just
you
know,
there's
too
much
work
to
get
done
for
everybody
to
be
able
to
participate
in
what
might
be
a
sweet
spot
for
participation
again
kind
of
going
back
to.
I
think
that
broader
discussion
is
probably
you
know,
going
to
take
some
more
time.
B
So
you
know,
but
I'm
happy
to
kind
of
chime
in
on
that,
so
I
I
I
think,
I'm
I'm
comfortable
with
this
5
p.m.
Did
you
councilman
davis
did?
Did
you
make
that
suggestion
as
well?
That
would
that
be
the
motion
that
we're
we're
moving
forward
here
today
is
some
form
of
a
time
shorter
time
than
the
15
minutes
that
we've
been
suggesting.
That
was
that
part
of
that
or
no.
J
B
Okay,
yeah,
I
thought
for
the
broader
discussion
that
was
fine.
I
also
think
it's
fine
if
we
want
to
raise
a
suggestion
to
the
council
on
on
a
you
know
something
different
of
a
time
limit
for
this
next
meeting
as
well.
I
I
you
know,
I
again,
I
you
know,
I
have
my
own
feelings
on
that.
As
you
all
know,
and
I
may
have
my
own
vote
on
the
way
I
feel
about
it,
but
I
think
it's
worth
discussions
because
there's
no
way
we
can
any
of
us
can
claim
we've
got
it
perfect
right.
B
H
C
C
E
E
As
far
as
the
time
certain,
I
think
I
think
we
ought
to
consider
in
the
future
being
even
more
specific
on
time
certain
because
I
think,
as
we
said
before,
saying
not
before,
doesn't
really
guarantee
anything
and
I'm
I'm
more
concerned
about
people
coming
as
councilmemberalla
said
tuning
into
a
meeting
and
then
still
sitting
there
for
five
hours
because
they
were
told
it
won't
be
before
five
o'clock
and
it
still
comes
at
10
o'clock.
I
mean
you
know.
E
Last
night's
example
you
know,
I
don't
think
anybody
anticipated
that
the
meeting
would
go
as
long
as
it
did
last
night,
and
so
we
didn't
plan
to
put
that
item
at
11
o'clock
last
night.
It
just
happened
that
way,
because
other
items
went
much
longer
than
we
expected.
We
could
have
said
that
item
won't
be
before
seven
or
before
eight
and
and
really
felt
that
it
probably
would
have
been
around
seven
or
eight
and
it
came
at
11..
E
While
people
are
well
well,
we
have,
while
we're
at
a
reasonable
time
for
people
and
that
would
have
to
go
along
with,
like
the
suggestion
I
wrote
up
before,
so
that
everyone
has
a
chance
to
participate
during
the
you
know
time
certain
part
of
it
early
and
then
participate
again
during
the
time
certain
part
late,
because
we
don't
know
because
we
never
know
how
long
those
those
public
hearings
are
going
to
go
so
anyway.
Those
are
my
thoughts,
but
I'm
certainly,
I
think,
that's
what
you
should
all
think
about
as
we
go
forward.
C
No
definitely,
I
think
those
are
all
really
good
suggestions
and
I
can
say
that
I'm
willing
to
try
anything
and
see
how
it
works.
So
you
know
let's
try
to
brainstorm
and
come
up
with
some
some
ideas
and
some
solutions
to
have
the
meetings
run
smoother
so
on.
So
we
have
a
motion
and
did
I
do
we
get
a
second
on
emotion,.
A
D
K
K
Yes,
go
ahead,
paul,
okay!
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
I
just
wanted
to
state
with
with
respect
to
what
councilman
cohen
was
saying.
I
would
like
it
if
we
can
possibly
have
a
conversation
or
agenda.
Is
it
in
a
prioritization
method?
What
I
mean
by
that
is
all
coveted
issues
that
are
copied
related.
We
know
what
they
are
rent
the
hazard
pay.
You
know
the
coveted
report
that
those
are
something
completely
separate
because
they
are
all
connected.
K
The
reason
why
my
logic
is
this:
I,
as
a
citizen
and
being
deprived
of
two
two
things
due
process
and
equal
protection
under
the
law,
as
a
citizen,
I'm
being
deprived
of
the
democratic
process
to
engage
in
it
and
that's
a
constitutionally
protected
right,
and
so
I
would
ask
attorney
freeman
to
really
explore
that,
because
that's
what
I'm
being
denied-
and
I
would
like
those
protected
and
advocated
for
because
these
these
this
last
night
should
be
embarrassing
for
certain
people.
That
meeting
should
be
very
embarrassing,
very
embarrassing.
K
I
was
embarrassed
by
it
very
embarrassed
and
ashamed
that
of
what
has
been
what
is
becoming
of
us
when
we
have
that
level
of
disrespect
and
and
complete
apathy
and
indifference
towards
the
suffering
that
is
going
on
in
the
city
that
you
vowed
as
a
to
protect
the
constitutional
rights
of
the
citizens
that
you
are
a
representation
of.
So
I
would
ask
that
that
just
that
a
prioritization
all
covered
related
issues,
one
separate
council
meeting
and
then
the
other
you
know
as
such.
Thank
you
thank.
G
Hi,
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
words
of
paul
soto,
to
try
to
add
a
bit
to
that.
If
I
can,
I
have
a
public
comment.
I
want
to
speak
about,
but
yeah.
I
wanted
to
thank
yourselves
for
the
for
the
care
that
you
took
on
that
last
item.
Paul
soto
mentioned.
Maybe
there's
a
way
you
can
have
all
the
cobit
19
issues
between
1,
30
and
5,
and
then
between
5
and
9
o'clock.
G
You
can
have
you
know
like
a
a
different
set
of
items
that
you
know
the
most
important
items
of
the
night.
Of
course
you
can
vary
bad
and
have
the
specialized
covet
issues
between
five
and
nine,
but
maybe
what
paul
said
to
have
a
block
of
the
cobit
issues
each
week
between
one
and
four
gives
people
a
consistency
and
then
five
to
nine
I
mean
to
have
you
know
the
the
most
important
items
of
the
of
the
evening.
That
would
be
really
cool
and
then
the
remainder
you
know
after
that.
G
So
thanks
a
lot
to
simply
offer
you
know
to
clarify
myself.
You
know
it's
rent,
freeze
issues.
I
guess
you
voted
on
last
night
and
just
a
thank
you
to
all
sides
and
how
you
negotiated.
That
was
very
nice
of
you
of
everyone.
Thank
you.
I'd
simply
like
to
remind
that
with
the
ceremonial
lighting
of
city
hall,
for
martin
luther
king
is
a
very
good
time.
G
Thank
you
with
17
15
seconds.
You
know,
reimagine
and
equity
ideas
are
really
important,
good
stuff
and
we
shouldn't
be
afraid
of
them,
and
they
should
be
ideas
that
we
can
talk
about
openly,
and
I
guess
we're
at
the
next
stage
of
how
to
talk
about
them
openly.
Basically,
so
good
luck
to
our
efforts
in
doing
that.
Thank
you.
C
C
K
I
mean
how
many,
how
much
cognitive
dissonance
does
one
have
to
overcome
in
order
to
understand
that
we
have
to
prioritize
the
resources
in
this
city
and
the
direction
that
they
are
going,
because
human
beings
are
dying
in
your
city.
Human
beings
are
dying
in
your
city
and
they
are
dying
through
neglect.
Neglect
is
an
action.
It's
an
act
of
omission.
K
There
is
an
omitting
of
an
act
that
compassion
and
understanding
should
compel,
and
so
this
is
I
it's
embarrassing
for
me
to
come
to
my
city,
the
city
of
my
birth,
the
city
of
my
legacy,
the
city
of
my
ancestors,
and
talk
to
adults
and
talk
to
representatives
of
my
city.
In
this
way,
it's
frustrating
and
embarrassing
for
me,
but
I'll.
Do
it
I'll?
Do
it,
because
I
know
who
I'm
advocating
for.
I
literally
represent
the
voices
of
literally
hundreds
of
thousands
of
our
citizens
in
this
city.
K
K
C
G
Hi,
thank
you.
I
wanted
to
speak
to
a
kind
of
retirement
plan,
planning
issues
and
from
the
last
item
can
I
hope
I
can
speak
to
him
on
this
item.
If
it's
okay
and
to
thank
paul
soto,
you
know
I'm
trying
to
to
learn
how
you
know
we
can
talk
about
retirement
plans
within
the
covid
framework
and
how
that
all
can
work
together.
I
hope
this
can
help
him
understand
understand
that
purpose.
G
G
It
has
helped
a
lot
in
my
thinking
and
decision
making
to
understand
the
severity
of
how
the
how
to
plan
economic
issues
and
cola.
Adjustments
for
the
year
2021
and
now,
interestingly,
can
be
of
help
with
current
questions
of
a
5.5
an
hour
raise
hazard
pay
for
frontline
grocery
workers
in
this
time
of
cobit
19.
G
G
in
what
was
referred
to
as
a
slippery
slope
at
last
night's
council
meeting
can
actually
be
some
of
our
decent
regular
practices
and
to
ask
that
if
we
simply
have
a
six-month
time
period
for
an
additional
five
dollars
an
hour
hazard
pay,
what
would
be
a
direction?
Could
we
go
into
2022
and
beyond
that
those
questions
could
become
more
clear
by
january
by
july
and
august.
G
J
Thank
you
vice
mayor,
so
this
memo
is
just
for
a
small
technical
change
and
I
held
it
all
of
all
of
last
year
because
there
was
so
much
going
on
with
with
covid
and
with
the
the
office
of
employee
relations
and
so
what
it.
What
it
is,
is
for
the
council
members
who
are
not
in
calpers
who,
who
chose
not
to
be
in
calpers.
J
What
what
those
of
us
who
who
chose
not
to
be
in
calpers,
were
in
or
are
in,
is
the
457
plan
which
is
usually
used
for
temporary
and
unbenefited
employees.
There
are
no
investment
options
in
that
plan,
which
wasn't
something
that
frankly,
I
knew
about
when
I
chose
it
that
that
it's
really
just
a
cash
account,
and
so
I
talked
with
jennifer
shmree
about
this,
and
I
see
that
you're
here
jennifer.
Thank
you
in
case.
J
My
colleagues
have
any
questions
and
there's
a
401a
plan
that
the
city
also
already
has
set
up
for
for
other
employees
and
I'm
not
sure
how
that
is
currently
used.
But
I
know
that
there
are
other
investment
options
in
that,
and
so
that's
just
what
I'm
asking
for
is
for
council
members
to
have
an
option
that
has
investment
plans
as
investment
options,
as
opposed
to
just
a
cash
account
or
calpers.
J
C
B
You
I
I
totally
support
this.
I
actually
as
an
officer,
I've
had
the
401a
plan
and
I
at
times
have
used
the
stable
option
when
I
don't
want
to
invest
anything
so
so,
if
you
have
the
457,
it's
not
it
is,
it
is
not
really
worth
much
so
I
I
agree
with
that.
My
only
question
was,
I
know,
typically
we'll
get
a
response
just
on
what
the
the
workload
or
it
sounds
like.
There
wasn't
at
least
a
formal
response
on
that.
So
is
this
just
not
a
big
heavy
lift.
A
Yeah,
I
don't
think
it's
a
very,
very
heavy,
lift,
okay,
great
yeah-
and
I
don't
know
if
nora
wants
to
speak
to.
I
think
the
attorney's
office
will
have
to
review
part
of
it
potentially.
So
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
the
attorney's
office,
but
from
hr's
perspective.
We
think
that
it's
something
that
we
could
manage.
B
J
A
C
K
G
Hi,
thank
you
I
mumbled
and
garbled.
My
last
words
from
my
last
comment.
I
hope
I
can
say
them
again
and
relate
it
to
this
item,
in
fact,
interestingly,
to
ask
that
if
we
simply
have
a
six
month
time
period
for
an
additional
five
dollars
in
hazard,
pay
now
by
july
and
august
of
this
year,
can
a
more
clear
direction
into
2022
and
beyond,
be
better
understood.
G
G
We
could
be
very
well
covered
and
safe
in
for
2021..
It's
my
thinking.
How
can
we
continue
that
cost
of
living
to
be
flat
into
2022?
I
don't
know
how
to
do
that,
so
I
will
not
be
like
really
supporting
such
an
this.
This
measure
and
I'll
be
trying
to
ask
questions
how
how
we
can
continue
to
to
maintain
a
flat
curve
of
inflation
into
2022.
A
L
L
L
K
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Vice
mayor,
I'd
like
to
echo
and
expand
on
blair
beekman's
and
the
previous
gentleman's
position
that
the
commodification
on
something
that
is
so
essential
and
absolutely
necessary
for
life.
That's
not
a
debatable
issue,
the
the
necessity
for
life
I
mean
for
water
or
for
shelter.
These
things
are
not
debatable
issues
I
think
we're
we're
not
doing
something
to
the
disadvantage,
to
the
poor,
to
the
impoverished,
to
the
red
line,
we're
not
doing
something
to
them.
H
I
moved
to
approve
the
the
item
and
I'll
tell
you
that
my
my
portion
of
the
district
that
is
struggling
the
most
during
this
pandemic
is
the
one
that's
going
to
be
hardest
hit.
This
is
the
service
area
that
that
that
will
have
this
23
increase
during
just
difficult
times.
Last
year
you
know
my
team
and
I
we
we
fought
really
hard
to
have
the
the
the
san
jose
municipal.
C
E
Make
that
I
just
does
that,
do
we
know?
Do
we
know
that
the
folks
were
available
to
be
there
on
that
date?
I
mean
we.
I
know
he
said
that
they
invited
representatives
to
be
there
and
they
said
they
could
come,
but
do
we,
it
didn't
have
a
date,
because
the
memo
said
that
the
memo
have
a
date
on
it
that
they
were
coming.
That
date.
A
E
A
That
council,
member
lee
wilcox
city
manager's
office,
I
think
we
would
talk
to
the
cupc
about
participating.
I
know
kerry
romanow
is
on
the
line
our
director
of
environmental
services
department,
who
has
been
in
discussion
with
the
water
district,
so
she
can
provide
more
timing
on
the
date
or
more
information
on
the
timing
of
the
day,
but
we
can
also
bring
this
back
in
a
future
horizon
report.
If
additional
flexibility
is
needed,
carrie.
F
I
K
K
What
chappy
jones
with
mayor
chad
vice
mayor
chappie
did
is
councilman
mayhem
was
picking
from
forbidden
fruit
that
fruit
is
tainted
the
minute
that
chappie
introduced
it
so
anything
that
flows
from
that.
I,
as
a
citizen,
am
deprived
of
debate
that
is
untainted
from
that
perspective
and
as
a
citizen,
I'm
looking
to
you
to
protect
me
because
you
actually
work
for
me
that
that
I'm
I'm
counting
on
you
on
this
one,
because
I
please
somebody
extend
my
my
respect
and
my
gratitude
to
councilwoman
esparza
because
she
caught
it.
She
was
quick.
K
She
was
quick
and
she
she
caught
that.
Okay,
I
caught
what
everything
that
happened
in
that
meeting.
You
know
I
caught
the
perspectives.
I
I
I'm
aware
of
the
law.
No,
I'm
not
a
lawyer.
I
don't
have
to
be
I'm
a
citizen
and
I've
educated
myself
around
these
kinds
of
issues,
and
so
what
I'm
looking
for
is
your
legal
perspective
to
to
to
actually
dismantle
that
entire
conversation
that
has
to
start
over?
K
The
entire
thing
has
to
start
the
entire
process
was
tainted
and
the
the
one
that
is
going
to
be
victimized
by
that
being
tainted
by
the
forbidden
fruit
that
vice
mayor
chappie
introduced
and
that
mahan?
Actually
I
mean
he
repeated
what
the
cardinals
said.
Ricardo
told
him
what
to
say,
and
then
man
repeats
it
like
a
robot
like
he's
a
puppet
master
behind
the
scenes
telling
mahan
what
to
do,
and
I
know
you
saw
the
whole
thing
I
know
and
from
a
legal
perspective.
I
know
you
were
just
like.
C
G
All
right,
thank
you
to
try
to
complete
my
words
from
last
night's
open
forum
in
the
ideas
of
good
preparation
and
planning.
Natural
disasters
like
wildfires,
sea
level,
rise
and
earthquakes
have
to
be
considered
included
in
envision.
2040
plans
to
prepare
for
natural
disasters
in
the
next
decade
around
the
sfa
area
should
not
be
an
excuse
to
continue
to
avoid
and
hide
good,
open
public
policy
ideas
and
practices
or
inhibit
the
development
of
open,
progressive,
sustainable
ideas
and
projects.
G
We
should
not
have
to
give
up
on
quality
or,
for
instance,
good,
renewable
energy
ideas
and
practices
simply
because
of
a
possible
natural
disaster.
Events
in
the
bay
area
in
the
next
five
to
ten
years
and
into
the
2040s
a
final
reminder
that
it
is
sustainable
ideas
and
good,
open
public
policies
that
can
offer
a
quicker
return
to
our
better
human
nature
after
a
natural
disaster
event.
G
Thank
you
with
the
previous
item
of
the
water
board.
It
just
dawned
on
me
and
occurred
to
me
that,
with
such
a
very
high
raise
in
rates
that
you're,
possibly
going
for
of
25,
did
I
hear
correctly
that
are
23,
that
that
sounds
like
that.
You're
considering
like
to
create
and
to
organize
a
large
subsidy
plan
for
such
a
high
rate
increase
and
I've
been
working.