►
Description
City of San José, California
Joint meeting of Rules and Open Government / Committee of the Whole, August 2, 2023
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be held at San José City Hall and also accessible via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=1115795&GUID=E9749EE4-7E04-4173-95EA-37E60E9A660D
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
Start
without
technology
or
will
we
have
our
ability
to
see
the
screen?
Oh
yeah,
the
screens
are
working.
Okay,
welcome
to
the
August,
9th
rules
of
meeting
of
the
rules
and
open
government
committee.
Let's
take
roll.
D
B
B
All
right,
let's
start
with
then
with
the
agenda
for
the
meeting
of
Tuesday
August
15th.
B
G
Good
afternoon
rules
committee,
it's
a
pleasure
to
be
back
in
front
of
you
again
as
always,
and
seeing
all
your
lovely
faces.
I'm
Christina,
Ramos
senior
government
Affairs
for
PG
e,
and
we
just
would
like
the
public
record
I
sent
a
letter
to
everyone
on
the
rules
committee,
but
for
the
public
record
I'm,
hoping
that
the
council
will
consider
deferring
item
6.1
on
the
August
15th
agenda.
G
I've
been
Our
concern
around
the
item
stems
from
the
fact
that
the
city
has
con
hasn't
conducted
the
appropriate
level
of
analysis
on
the
feasibility
of
this,
and
although
I
don't
have
an
exhaustive
list,
the
staff
memorandum
also
assumes
that
a
government
run
utility
would
be
able
to
provide
lower
rates
to
its
customers
without
impacting
the
level
of
service,
while
maintaining
the
same
level
of
support
for
the
city's
general
fund
and
I'd
like
to
point
out
that
creating
a
utility
could
result
in
legal
obstacles.
G
If
a
new
entity
wanted
to
make
payments
in
lieu
of
taxes
to
make
government
entities
whole
and
that
this
would
essentially
amount
to
new
taxes
paid
by
San
Jose
residents.
As
we
know,
our
residents
have
predominantly
been
more
acquired
to
focusing
on
homelessness,
Public,
Safety
and
the
like,
and
all
we're
asking
for
here
is
to
have
a
public
dialogue
with
all
of
the
stakeholders.
G
H
I
Blair
Beekman
just
to
comment
on
the
previous
a
bit
on
the
public
previous
public
comment.
Thank
you
for
it
a
reminder.
Community
energy
is
really
important
goals
to
be
working
on
and
for
the
previous
public
commenter
to
want
a
public
forum
for
what
she
wants
to
speak.
To.
Thank
you
for
that.
It's
important
to
have
that
dialogue.
I
It's
important
to
be
reminded
of
what
the
future
of
community
energy
can
be
working
towards
and
the
goals
it
can
accomplish,
as
as
a
as
a
community
process
as
a
particip
participatory
process,
I
think
it's
a
really
hopeful
thing
and
and
always
in
looking
for
ways
to
invite
the
public
to
lower
fees,
less
corporate
dominance
and
more
local
energy,
making
ideas
and
practices.
Those
are
the
sort
of
things
we
should
be.
Looking
for
and
good
luck
in
those
efforts.
Thank
you.
B
J
New
technology
we're
all
trying
to
get
used
to
thank
you
for
the
public
comments
and
I
just
want
to
share
a
couple
of
thoughts.
Well,
I
think
that
there's
a
potential
for
a
great
low-cost,
Municipal
electrical
utility
through
San
Jose
power
I,
do
have
significant
concerns
about
continuing
to
move
forward.
I
firmly
believe
that
as
a
city,
we
should
stick
to
our
core
competencies,
but
I
think
we
need
to
investigate
this
further
and
see
where
this
actually
takes
us.
J
I
appreciate
it
and
and
I've
been
public
on
my
concerns
about
this
in
the
past.
So
this
none
of
this
is
new,
but
I
am
also
thought
about
thoughtful
about
it
and
know
that
we
need
a
more
reliable
source
of
electricity
going
forward,
especially
as
we're
pushing
development
and
we're
pushing
all
electrification
too.
So
I
understand
the
the
need
and
desire
for
that.
But
can
you
tell
me
what
type
of
analysis
was
conducted
to
ensure
that
San
Jose
power
establishing
San
Jose
power
would
be
feasible.
K
Sure
yeah,
thank
you
for
the
question,
so
Lori
Mitchell,
director
of
community
energy,
so
we
have
been
working
on
this
for
a
number
of
years.
As
you
know,
we
did
a
study
session
last
year.
A
lot
of
financial,
modeling
and
Analysis
went
into
that
study
session
about
a
year
ago
to
serve
projects
in
the
dyrdon
area.
K
We're
continuing
that
analysis
and
that
analysis
concluded
Savings
in
the
range
of
15
to
25
percent
and
importantly,
going
forward
with
the
item
on
next
Tuesday
will
allow
us
to
continue
that
analysis
by
submitting
this
interconnection
application
that
will
allow
us
to
get
additional
costs
on
what
that
would
cost
to
connect
so
that
we
can
come
back
to
council
with
even
more
information
on
on
those
costs.
Before
proceeding
with,
you
know
offering
that
service.
J
So
the
vote
on
Tuesday
isn't
a
hundred
percent
vote
to
go
forward?
It's
to
continue
the
investigation
and
you'll
come
back
to
us
with
more
information
when
of
more
details
that
will
be
of
a
substitute
substantive
nature
for
us
is.
K
K
J
Great,
thank
you
and
what
kind
of
Outreach
have
you
done
so
far
to
stakeholders,
the
community
interested.
A
K
This
you
know,
mostly,
we've
been
working
with
Ellis
power.
Who
is
the
developer
to
that?
The
Kyocera
has
selected
to
construct
the
transmission
lines,
and
you
know
that's
really
why
we're
phasing
this
the
way
it
is
they're
in
the
design
phase
right
now,
and
so
we
have
an
opportunity
to
submit
an
application
and
be
designed
in,
and
so
that's
why
we're
recommending
the
steps
today
that
we
are,
but
there's
a
lot
to
come
over
the
next
five
years
before
we
would
actually
offer
that
service.
J
Okay,
great
I
really
appreciate
that
and
chair
con
is
the
motion
in
order.
F
B
J
B
All
right
we've
had
a
motion
and
a
s
I
know
I,
know.
I
know
we
had
a
motion.
A
second
councilmember
Jimenez
is
next
slide
flashing.
That's
the
nice
feature
here.
I
can
see
the
little
flashing
green
light.
D
D
If
you
can
even
touch
on
whether
a
deferment
about
of
about
a
week
or
so
would
be,
would
be
okay
and
what
type
of
conversations
you
think
can
be
had
within
that
week
to
sort
of
bring
into
the
fold
some
of
the
stakeholders,
such
as
different
bargaining
units
or
or
even
a
PG
e.
Obviously
we
have
a
representative
here
and
just
to
get
your
thoughts
and
and
if
you
want
to
wrap
into
that
answer,
just
the
application
and
the
timing
of
it.
K
Sure
yeah,
thank
you
very
much
for
the
question,
so
we
would
recommend
proceeding
with
the
interconnection
application,
as
I
said,
because
Ellis
power
right
now
is
designing,
and
so,
if
we
want
the
option
to
connect
to
these
lines,
this
is
the
time
when
it
would
be
most
cost
effective
because
we
can
be
designed
in
if
we
wait.
Potentially
they
get
further
along
in
that
design
and
it
becomes
higher
cost.
K
Also,
if
we
wait,
we
run
the
risk
of
other
developers
wanting
to
connect
to
these
lines
in
that
capacity
being
taken
up,
and
so,
while
we
think
it's
very
important
to
engage
with
stakeholders
there's
plenty
of
time
to
do
that.
We
we
absolutely
plan
to
do
that
over
the
next
several
years,
as
we
continue
to
analysis
analyze
this
and
would
be
very
open
to
that.
But
we
do
recommend
proceeding
with
submitting
this
interconnection
application
just
to
preserve
this
option
in
the
future.
D
D
I
and
I
assume
just
because
you
know
I
read
the
memo,
obviously
for
the
15th,
but
I
think
time
and
again
what
I
see
in
some
of
the
languages.
This
is
not
committing
us
right.
D
As
I
expressed
before
I
fear
that
we
get
too
far
down
the
road,
then
we're
going
to
say
we
should
just
keep
going
because
we're
almost
80
of
the
way
there
right.
If
you
will-
and
so
that's
my
concern,
and
so
although
there
is
two
three
years
or
five
years,
even
for
this
to
actually
get
built
out
and
I
appreciate
the
the
urgency
to
get
into
the
design
phase.
D
I
think
that
the
question
before
the
council
sooner
rather
than
later,
is
going
to
be
whether
we
want
to
continue
to
go
down
this
road
and
I.
Think
I
suspect
for
most
of
us.
An
important
component
of
that
is
what
are
some
of
the
stakeholders
say
and
what
valuable
information
can
they
share?
That
maybe
can
provide
some
clarity
as
to
some
of
the
stuff
that
we're
reading
in
the
memo
and
so
I
I'd
be
I'd.
D
D
K
M
D
N
D
We
are
truly
interested
in
bringing
this
forward
and
allowing
it
to
sort
of
continue
down
this
path
to
that
critical
decision.
Point
that
I
fear
we're
already
on
I
I
I'm,
not
sure
that
the
council,
given
the
current
structure
as
it
relates
to
engaging
other
folks,
is
going
to
be
supportive
of
it.
But
I
guess
I'm,
not
sure
one
week
is
going
to
make
a
big
difference.
Just
based
on
your
response
and
I
suspect.
Pg
e
would
probably
need
more
time
as
well
and
other
stakeholders
well.
J
That's
my
thought:
I
mean
I'm
I'm,
always
interested
in
more
engagement,
but
it
doesn't
sound
like
one
week
is
going
to
matter
and
I
haven't
looked
at
the
agenda
on
August
22nd
to
see
how
big
of
an
agenda
that
is
and
I'd
hate
to
put
this
in
an
impacted
agenda.
I
know
we're
going
to
adopt
that
in
the
next
vote,
but
I
mean
do
you
is
yeah.
A
D
I
mean
I
would
prefer
longer
than
a
week
right,
but
I'm
trying
to
be
sensitive
to
the
timeline
that
you're
you're
you're
you're,
mentioning
Lori,
so
I'd
be
more
sympathetic
to
longer
than
a
week,
but
I
I
realize
that
that's
not
even
going
to
make
a
difference,
and
so
I
I'll
retract.
My
my
request
for
refinement,
friendly
Amendment
and
then,
depending
on
how
the
conversation
goes.
I
may
or
may
not
support
it,
but
thank
you.
Lori
thanks.
J
B
All
right,
thank
you.
Vice
mayor
kame,.
O
Thank
you
so
much
I
too
believe
that
this
should
go
in
front
of
council.
However,
the
request
today
was
for
only
that
week
so
for,
however,
it
was
determined
from
one
of
the
largest
providers.
Pg
E
I-
think
that
it's
worth
thinking
about,
although
we
may
think
well
in
a
week,
you
can't
there's
not
a
lot.
That's
going
to
be
done.
I
understand
that,
there's
a
longer
conversation
that
needs
to
be
made,
but
I
think
that
it's
important
to
encourage
greater
participation.
This
is
a
huge
project.
O
Really
really
big
I
mean
it's
going
to
be
tremendously
significant
for
a
very,
very
long
time
and
I
think
that
it's
worth
holding
it
over
a
week,
which
is
what
was
requested
in
order
for
a
conversation
to
take
place.
I,
don't
know,
what's
on
their
mind
or
why
you
know
they
would
like
to
have
a
conversation
with
our
staff
or
why
they
didn't
reach
out
to
them
sooner
or
whatever,
but
I
think
that
it's
important
to
encourage
that
participation
and
to
be
thoughtful
in
the
engagement.
O
Yes,
there's
going
to
to
be
a
second
part
where
there's
going
to
be
much
more
longer
conversation,
but
it's
worth
entertaining
so
I
think
that
it's
important,
obviously
my
colleague
Sergio,
is
is
has
has
asked
for
a
friendly
amendment.
I
would
ask
for
that.
One
week,
regardless
I
looked
at
the
August
22nd
agenda.
It
is
light.
It
is
not
as
as
as
as
heavy
and
it
could
be
placed
on
that
agenda.
Item
I,
don't
know
what
difference
that
would
make
and
I
guess
I
would
ask.
B
All
right,
thank
you.
You
know
I
mean
I'm
in
kind
of
ambivalent
about
the
one
week,
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
it
matters
whether
we
do
this
on
the
15th
or
22nd.
My
understanding,
based
on
what
we
heard
from
Lori,
is
that
one
week
isn't
going
to
change
the
result
here.
I
think
they're
concerned
about
anything
longer
than
a
week.
I
I
also
agree
with
councilmember
Foley.
B
Actually,
honestly,
we
and
we
should
I,
recommend
you
know
having
that
conversation
with
PG
e
and
with
whoever
else
feels
we
should
have
that
conversation
I,
don't
know
that
postponing
it
a
week,
though,
resolves
the
really
bigger
issues
which
PG
e
raises
and
mother
stakeholders
raise
about
whether
this
is
going
to
end
up
being
affordable,
whether
it's
the
right
thing
for
the
city
to
engage
in
whether
it's
and
all
those
decisions
will
be
multi-year.
Conversations
that
are
necessary
to
have
it'll
be
absolutely
essential
to
have
stakeholder
involvement.
B
I
can
preview
the
fact
that
I,
you
know
planned
with
others
to
potentially
submit
a
memo
that
requires
certain
level
steps
of
levels
of
Engagement
during
the
process,
so
that
we'll
make
sure
that
that
will
be
incorporated
into
the
process
going
forward.
You
know
I'm
fine
with
postponing
it.
It
looks
like
the
15th
is
a
slightly
less
shorter
meeting
than
the
22nd,
but
it's
honestly,
neither
one
matters
to
me.
B
I
just
want
to
reiterate
the
basic
Point
underneath
all
this,
which
is
that
there's
a
one,
probably
once
in
a
generation
window
occurring
right
now
between
now
and
2028,
while
kaiso
is
putting
in
a
new
transmission
lines,
two
new
transmissions
lined
into
San,
Jose
and
and
really
the
only
time
that
it
makes
sense
for
us
to
be
considering
some
interconnects
that
we
might
own
as
opposed
to
a
different
entity.
Owning
would
be
to
do
it
in
conjunction
with
kaiso's
work.
B
That's
happening
right
now
in
North,
San,
Jose
and
in
coming
into
downtown
San
Jose.
So
it's
an
important
window,
though
I
believe
we
should
take
advantage
of
in
order
to
pursue
an
option
that
gives
us
some
some
future
flexibility
and
the
key
word
there
that
Lori
mentioned
is
option.
What
this
action
would
do
is
give
us
an
option
going
forward
that
otherwise
would
not
be
available
to
us
I'm.
Not
so
anyway,
I
don't
I'm
I
mean
if
it's
the
will
to
postpone
it
one
extra
week.
B
That's
fine,
maybe
I
would
just
recommend
that
we
keep
it
on
the
15th,
but
we
ask
that
a
conversation
occurs
with
the
stakeholders.
Between
now
and
next
Tuesday,
which
would
probably
be
the
same
conversation
that
would
occur
even
if
we
postponed
it
by
a
week
and
that
we
keep
it
on
the
15th
agenda
if
that's
acceptable
to
colleagues.
P
This
has
not
come
before
council
at
all
as
an
idea,
and
so
I
think
it's
worth
having
that
discussion
sooner
rather
than
later,
with
the
council
happy
to
have
staff
have
some
preliminary
conversations
before
that,
but
I
think
getting
the
temperature
of
the
council
sooner
rather
than
later,
actually
makes
sense
before
Lori
goes
off
and
does
a
bunch
of
Outreach
that
may
or
may
not
be
necessary,
so
I
think
keeping
it
for
next
week
actually
makes
more
sense
than
delaying
it
a
week
so
that
the
council
can
weigh
in
and
provide
Direction
about
what
kinds
of
Outreach
and
and
what
other
things
that
that
maybe
we
should
be
thinking
about
as
we
go
forward
and
I
hope
that
there
will
be
a
presentation
on
the
decision
points
that
we
will
be
taking
and
kind
of.
P
O
I
I
guess
what
I
would
encourage
is
for
there
be
there
to
be
a
conversation
from
now
until
it
comes
before
Council,
because
obviously
there
needs
to
be
some
communication
there.
So
I
would
highly
encourage
that.
B
Thank
you
vice
mayor
now,
we'll
move
on
to
a
vote.
I
think
we
have
to
do
a
Voice
vote
still.
B
A
B
Right,
the
new
technology,
we'll
figure
it
out
now
we're
on
to
the
agenda
for
Tuesday
August
22nd.
M
B
B
We
have
under
strategic
support
airport
shuttle,
bus
service
contract,
Tree,
Care
Services
and
a
elevator
upgrade
project
for
the
Market
Street
Garage.
B
C
I
Hi
I'm
Gloria
Beekman
sounds
like
you
did
some
nice
work
on
that
last
item.
Thank
you
for
this
item.
2.10
is
about
funding
agreements
for
the
future
of
Urban
Village
of
things.
I
I
thought
it
would
be
important
to
remind
yourselves
at
this
time.
You
know
for
years,
I've
been
talking
about
Urban
Villages
as
not
being
finding
funding
for
urban
Villages,
not
just
through
high
high-end
developers,
but
that
can
serve
low-income
housing
in
our
future.
I
I
think
that's
important
goal
to
work
on
good
luck
on
those
efforts,
item,
2.12
and
item
four:
something
are
related:
they're
you're
actually
going
to
have
the
police
reform
ideas
take
place.
I
think
that's
part
of
what
was
asked
for
way
back
in
April
that
keeps
being
put
off,
I'm,
not
sure
operational,
Improvement
and
just
you
know
better
Human
Services
practices,
along
with
the
psychological
report
things
I've
talked
often
after
the
George
Floyd
pings.
There's
ideas
about
Mutual
Aid,
where
there's
just
good
Psychological
Services
for
police
for
each
other
learning
those
good
skills.
I
I
I
talked
a
lot
yesterday
about
the
woman
who
had
trouble
yesterday,
I'm
learning
more
about
her
situation
and
what's
happened
and
I
can
understand
it
better,
I,
I,
just
I,
still
think
the
need
of
just
openness
and
how
to
deal
with
those
sort
of
situations
in
the
future
has
to
be
always,
first
and
foremost,
and
good
luck
on
how
to
do
that.
I'll,
probably
talk
more
about
this
open
forum
and
thank
you.
Q
Yes,
I
apologize.
My
my
statement
was
on
6.1
and
I
believe
you
guys
have
already
voted
on
it.
So
it's
probably
past
my
time
to
give
a
statement.
A
B
I
Hi
I'll
play
Beekman
here,
a
monthly
report
on
activities
for
June
and
July
2023
and
to
approve
the
city
Auditor's
fiscal
year
report
last
time
I
saw
we
we
saw
each
other
was
back
in
June,
good
luck
on
how
we're
working
on
neighborhood
issues
and
that
I'm,
hoping
things
like
crime,
statistics
and
vehicle
accidents
have
not
been
too
bad
in
San,
Jose
they've
been
okay,
and
that
means
good
Community
effort
from
everyone.
I
Thank
you,
I
hope,
that's
what's
happening
and
I
wanted
to
weigh
in
and
offer
my
public
comment
on
the
current
Union
city
government
Union
issues
that
that
can
be
a
part
of
the
city
Auditors
fiscal
year,
2023-24
work
report.
It's
my
feeling.
I
I,
don't
I'm
not
very
good
at
depth
with
these
sort
of
issues,
but
on
the
surface,
I
think
we
have
a
really
good
impressive
years
coming
up
in
24
and
25
Community
around
Community
issues
and
community
building
and
Community
projects,
and
it's
my
sincere
hope.
I
I
It's
my
personal
feeling
on
the
top
on
the
surface
that
you
know,
they're
asking
for
like
five
percent
raises
this
first
upcoming
year:
I
think
that
can
be
reduced
a
lot
to
like
maybe
two
percent,
which
is
about
you
know:
2
000
bucks
a
month.
That's
still
a
lot
I
think
and
it
respects
things.
We
can
work
on
the
on
the
12
plan
over
the
upcoming
years,
and
it's
with
that.
I
We
can
really
focus
and
concentrate
as
a
full
community
process
on
some
really
good
City
projects
that
are
coming
up
and
I
really
hope.
Those
aren't
going
to
be
hurt
and
I
I
hope,
city
government
when
if
they
can
hear
this,
can
take
this
to
heart,
I'm.
Sorry,
if
I'm
a
little
shallow
about
the
matter,
but
you
know
this
is
everyday
public,
giving
you
an
opinion
on
the
subject.
I
I
hope
you
can
now
take
it
to
heart.
Thank
you.
B
All
right
we
have
Motion
in
a
second
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
opposed
all
right.
Consent.
Calendar
is
adopted
five
zero.
So
now
we're
on
to
our
two
memos
item,
one
addressing
RVs
around
schools.
I
think
we
had
somebody
from
I.
Don't
know.
Mckenzie
from
the
mayor's
office
was
going
to
be
here
to
introduce
the
memo
or
is
she
online
I?
Don't
know
I
thought
or
on
Zoom
okay,
so
we
can
McKenzie's
hands
up
I
guess
we
can
recognize
her
to
introduce
the
memo.
R
B
S
Alfredo
Hernandez
Jr
good
afternoon,
I
am
Alfredo
Hernandez
Jr
a
12th
grade
student
at
KIPP,
San,
Jose,
Collegiate,
High,
School
and
I
also
hold
the
role
of
President
and
founder
of
the
KIPP
San
Jose
Collegiate
High
School
Democrats
our
Coalition
initiated
and
leads
this
movement,
and
we
are
here
today
to
address
a
matter
that
weighs
heavily
on
our
hearts.
Throughout
my
time
here,
I've
witnessed
and
heard
of
numerous
experiences
involving
my
classmates
in
the
RV
Community
neighboring
our
school
on
Educational
Park
Drive.
S
These
issues
have
ranged
from
unhoused
individuals
within
the
RV
Community
trespassing
onto
campus
during
school
hours
to
interactions
with
my
classmates
that
involve
theft
and
the
presence
of
drugs.
These
experiences
bring
about
feelings
of
dread
and
disappointment,
as
my
classmates
have
faced
genuine
threats
to
their
Safety
and
Security.
As
a
fellow
student
in
this
High
School
hearing,
the
concerns
of
my
peers
has
led
me
to
question
my
own
safety
and
wonder
if
I
might
be
the
next
to
face
sex
challenges.
The
RV
Community
is
a
mere
30
feet
away
from
our
school.
S
This
memorandum
offers
a
potential
solution
to
the
challenges
my
classmates
have
been
coping
with.
With
a
particular
focus
on
enhancing
Safety
and
Security
at
KIPP,
San
Jose
Collegiate,
with
your
approval
of
this
memorandum,
we
would
not
only
be
acknowledging
the
well-being
of
our
current
students,
but
also
Paving
the
way
for
future
Generations.
This
is
a
great
importance
to
me,
especially
considering
my
strong
desire
to
spare
future
East
San
Jose
students
from
enduring
the
same
distressing,
Safety
and
Security
challenges.
S
The
hardships
that
our
current
students
have
faced
are
already
burdensome
and
the
need
for
Swift
action
is
undeniable
guiding
my
peers
as
the
president
of
the
KIPP
San
Jose
Collegiate
High,
School,
Democrats
I've,
shared
in
their
sorrow
and
pain.
Rejecting
this
memorandum
with
subject
our
students
to
further
suffering
and
during
another
year
under
these
conditions,
is
unimaginable.
Approving
this
memorandum
is
the
Practical
and
necessary
solution
for
the
well-being
of
high
school
students
like
us.
Thank
you.
Council.
U
T
Hi
I'm
gershwambola
I'm,
a
student
at
Kip,
San,
Jose,
Collegiate
and
I
want
to
provide
some
of
my
personal
experiences
surrounding
the
issue
around
safety
at
our
local
school
I
would
like
to
talk
about
the
lack
of
safety
around
the
school.
As
seen
as
in
the
memorandum
we
have
experienced
numerous
break-ins
to
which
our
school
cannot
simply
cannot
afford
the
repairs
for
these
items
that
come
directly
aside
of
the
collective
School
pocket
and
leaves
the
students
deprived
of
what's
promised
to
the
educational
system.
T
Not
only
has
the
break-ins
shattered
the
concept
of
safety,
it
continues
to
Shackle
the
advancement
of
our
school.
Ultimately,
if
anything
transformative
is
to
be
done
to
improve
the
safety
of
our
school,
we
would
simply
be
unable
to
not
being
able
to
afford
due
to
constant
break-ins
and
destruction
of
property.
Creating
a
buffer
around
schools
is
the
first
step
in
assuring
the
greater
safety
of
San
Jose
students,
especially
in
our
Coalition.
As
a
group
of
students.
We
understand
that
homelessness
is
not
in
San.
T
Jose
is
not
something
that
can
simply
be
solved
by
moving
around
the
unhoused,
but
as
a
collective
I
am
certain
that
we
we
can
agree.
Homelessness
is
not
something
students
should
have
to
walk
by
every
single
day
on
the
way
to
school.
Hopefully,
in
the
future,
we
can
work
jointly
in
creating
a
solution
providing
those
outside
our
campus
with
stable
housing
and
ensuring
that
they
are
successful.
However,
most
pressing
for
us
as
students
is
our
lack
of
safety
as
seen
firsthand.
Thank
you.
V
Brittany
Delong
good
afternoon
Council,
my
name
is
Brittany
dewang
and
I'm,
a
11th
grade
student
at
KIPP,
San,
Jose,
Collegiate,
High
School,
located
on
Educational
Park
Drive
in
East,
San,
Jose
I'm,
a
proud
student
athlete
as
I've
participated
in
Cross
Country.
However,
the
RV
Community
neighboring
our
school,
has
negatively
impacted
the
experience
of
my
teammates
and
I.
Due
to
our
school
lacks
of
athletic
facilities.
We
had
to
improvise
and
use
neighboring
grounds
in
order
to
practice.
Cross-Country
requires
an
area
to
run
for
our
long-distance
practices
and
the
r
b
Community
neighboring.
V
Our
school
has
caused
disruptions,
but
also
dangerous
situations.
My
teammates
have
to
go
through
female
Runners
have
been
required
to
run
in
groups
and
not
alone.
This
was
due
to
the
fact
that
many
of
us
have
been
followed
by
the
those
residing
in
the
RVs
in
the
area
while
Arna
runs.
I
was
on
a
run
with
one
of
my
female
teammates.
When
someone
from
the
line
of
RVs
called
out
to
us,
we
ignored
their
comments
and
continued
running,
but
we
could
not
help
but
notice
them
following
us
from
behind
afraid.
V
We
made
a
dash
to
the
corner
of
the
block
and
bumped
into
a
group
of
our
mail
Runners.
We
we
are
running
back
towards
campus
to
finish
their
first
lap.
We
had
to
ask
them
to
accompany
us
back
to
campus,
not
knowing
where
the
person
from
before
was
still
there
or
not.
This
is
just
one
of
many
incidents,
as
mentioned
before,
we
had
countless
break-ins,
especially
in
our
bands,
who
are
that
our
sports
teams
depend
on
in
order
to
go
to
our
meets
due
to
our
Advance
being
either
stolen
or
broken.
V
W
Vienna
Alvarez
good
afternoon,
council
members,
my
name
is
Viana
Alvarez
and
I
am
a
12th
grade
student
at
the
kip
San
Jose
Collegiate
High
School,
located
on
edge
Educational
Park
Drive
in
East,
San,
Jose
I'm.
Also,
a
student
athlete
and
the
break-ins
have
deeply
affected
the
athletic
department.
In
many
ways
this
includes
athletic
fans
that
each
sport
uses
as
transportation
for
games
are
continuously
being
stolen
and
have
left
players
needing
to
find
their
own
ways
of
transportation.
W
Not
only
does
this
leave
the
school
having
to
pay
for
all
the
damages,
but
it
is
extremely
inconvenient
and
tiresome
of
the
same
thing
happening
over
and
over
again.
One
day
when
I
was
at
the
store,
I
saw
an
unhoused
individual,
not
far
from
school.
That
was
wearing
a
stolen
soccer.
Uniform
Not
only
was
it
surprising,
but
a
show
that,
because
they
are
so
close
to
our
campus,
we
never
know
what
they
are
capable
of
doing.
I
shouldn't
have
to
experience
these
challenges.
W
X
Elena
Santiago
good
afternoon,
council
members,
I'm
Elena
Santiago,
a
student
at
Cape,
San,
Jose,
Collegiate,
High
School,
and
the
vice
president
of
kshcc
high
school
Democrats
I,
am
here
to
request
your
support
in
approving
the
memorandum
that
the
mayor
and
my
school
have
been
working
on
the
past
few
months.
I
want
to
go
more
in
depth
about
the
issues
the
school
and
students
have
dealt
with.
X
As
you
may
know,
the
past
few
years
the
unhoused
individuals
have
been
breaking
into
our
schools,
stealing
from
our
classrooms
and
our
resources,
staff
and
students
on
campus
no
longer
feel
safe
with
these
unhoused
individuals
coming
onto
campus
during
the
day
and
late
at
night,
my
mom
Patty
Santiago
has
been
the
director
of
school
operations
at
khcc
for
the
last
15
years.
In
the
past
two
years,
my
mom
has
gone
multiple
calls
from
the
security
company
informing
her.
There
has
been
a
break-in
in
our
high
school.
X
My
mom
has
had
to
wake
up
at
the
middle
of
the
night
and
meet
with
these
police
officers
at
school
countless
times
during
these
incidents.
My
anxiety
would
keep
me
awake
until
she
returned.
The
school
has
had
a
total
of
six
Vans,
two
that
were
totaled
and
one
that
was
never
recovered
in
multiple
incidents.
Our
guests
are
against
things
that
have
been
drilled
to
acquire
fifty
dollars
worth
of
gas
and
in
return
it
costs
the
school
over
a
thousand
to
replace
the
gas
tanks.
This
is
only
a
few
of
the
issues
regarding
the
vans.
X
In
addition,
my
mom
has
had
to
call
the
police
15
times
to
report
a
break-in.
Besides,
the
Vans
items
that
have
been
stolen
include
laptops,
canopies
for
paintings,
uniforms,
athletic
jerseys,
PE
equipment
and
Etc
on
the
last
month
of
school.
On
our
way
home,
we
knew
we
noticed
some
of
the
unhoused
individuals
wearing
our
Kip
uniforms.
Lastly,
our
fence
have
been
cut
over
13
times
and
our
classroom
Windows
have
been
shattered
at
least
five
times
in
the
most
recent
break-in.
An
individual
was
caught
on
camera,
breaking
Windows
to
four
classrooms,
but
never
entered
the
classrooms.
X
The
individual
was
just
there
to
vandalize
the
school
over.
These
countless
break-ins,
it
has
cost
the
school
thousands
of
dollars,
but
most
importantly,
I
want
the
city
council
to
know
that
I
am
my
fellow
classmates
no
longer
feel
safe
at
school,
and
the
passwords
of
this
item
will
change
that.
Thank
you.
Y
I
live
in
District
3
in
San,
Jose
and
I'm
here
today,
with
surge
stand
up
for
racial
Justice
every
day,
I
see
our
unhoused
neighbors
struggling
to
live
in
my
neighborhood
I'm
concerned
about
the
proposal
to
establish
no
encampment
zones
in
San
Jose
foreign.
We
need
to
have
adequate
plans
for
dealing
with
this
issue
without
using
law
enforcement
to
move
people
around.
This
is
an
intrinsically
traumatizing
for
people
who
may
be
vulnerable.
Y
It
can
break
up
their
communities
and
it
isn't
effective.
In
the
long
run,
we
need
non-smoran
public
workers
to
be
our
service
and
and
Outreach
providers.
We
need
to
put
our
resources
into
proven
ways
to
end
homelessness.
Interim
housing
has
a
role,
but
we
need
to
really
push
efforts
to
develop
long-term,
stable,
affordable
housing
and
maybe
even
more
important.
We
need
to
work
to
prevent
people
from
becoming
homeless
in
the
first
place,
it's
much
more
effective
and
in
the
long
run
it's
cheaper.
So
thank
you.
N
We've
heard
previous
speakers
talking
about
the
criminals
who
are
homeless
or
we
think
those
criminals
are
homeless.
But
I
want
to
present
a
picture
of
like
the
woman
who's
sleeping
on
my
sofa,
who
is
indicative
of
what's
happening
in
my
neighborhood
and
her
son,
who
is
an
adult
with
his
therapy
dog?
He
works,
but
he's
sleeping
in
his
in
his
truck.
N
N
They
were
the
longest
tenants
in
that
particular
apartment
complex,
but
those
are
the
ones
who
get
targeted
because
they're
paying
the
least
amount
of
rent
because
of
rent
control,
which
is,
and
so
anyway,
they
are
now
out
on
the
street
or
one
is
you
know
like
I
say
the
mother
is
living
on
my
sofa,
but
I
don't
want
the
city
to
be
creating
widespread,
no
encampment
zones
and
further
victimizing
people
who
have
been
victims
of
basically.
N
What
is
speculative
real
estate
investment
where
investors,
many
of
them
Wall
Street,
many
of
them
from
out
of
the
city
or
from
out
of
the
state
and
from
overseas,
are
buying
up
properties
that
we
have
termed
as
to
be
naturally
affordable.
Those
are
older
apartment
buildings.
Usually
the
tenants
are
lower
income
people,
often
people
of
color,
as
are
the
woman
sleeping
on
my
sofa,
who
is
Latina
and
doesn't
speak
much
English.
N
These
speculators
buy
these
naturally
affordable
housing,
as
the
city
calls
them,
they
call
them
underperforming
buildings
in
real
estate
parlance
and
they
buy
them
and
then
raise
the
rants
beyond
what
the
tenants
can
afford
and
then,
when
they
can't
afford
it
or
if
they
pay
a
day
late,
they
get
evicted
and
they
believe
me
I'm,
trying
to
find
this
woman.
Thank.
AA
My
name
is
Reese
engheart,
local
Community,
member
and
member
of
showing
up
for
racial
Justice
at
Sacred,
Heart
speaking
in
solidarity
with
survivors
of
the
streets
and
racial
equity
and
Community
safety
at
Sacred,
Heart
I've
heard
stories
of
unhoused
people
being
sweeped
without
enough
notice
and
having
their
belongings
taken
away,
and
it
always
breaks
my
heart
to
hear
those
stories.
Imagine
the
experience
of
having
so
little
and
then
having
that
taken
away
from
you
too.
Nobody
deserves
that
right.
Everybody
deserves
environment
that
is
safe
and
comfortable
for
them.
AA
Of
course,
these
students
deserve
a
safe
and
comfortable
learning
environment
too,
but
if
we,
if
we
criminalize
people
who
experience
homelessness,
that
will
make
it
harder
for
them
to
achieve
a
permanent,
stable
housing
and
harder
for
them
to
attend
work
or
school
or
all
of
these
things.
So
I'm
asking
you
to
decriminalize.
AA
Do
not
move
forward
with
an
approach
that
relies
on
law
enforcement
instead
develop
community-based
responses
that
include
conversations
between
unhoused
and
housed
neighbors,
to
resolve
complaints
and
to
connect
people
with
services
and
I
also
support
more
funding
for
such
community-based
services
to
find
a
holistic
solution
to
homelessness.
As
a
systemic
problem,
thank
you.
AB
Foreign,
hello,
council
members,
my
name
is
Fernanda
and
I'm
a
senior
here
at
Cape
San,
Jose
Collegiate,
member
of
the
ksjc
Democrats,
and
a
resident
of
District
5..
Earlier
these
past
weeks,
I
was
given
the
opportunity
to
help
create
this
ordinance
and
share
my
story
with
the
public
about
being
followed
by
an
RV
resident.
AB
It's
sad
to
say,
but
when
this
happened,
I
wasn't
scared.
I
grew
up
my
whole
life
around
these
type
of
situations
in
all
different
kinds
of
schools.
Just
like
many
kids.
In
the
East
side,
this
situation
occurred
in
late
2022
and
was
one
that
truly
showed
me
how
much
attention
our
school
is
lacking
when
it
comes
to
maintaining
safety,
and
although
that
is
one
of
the
most
unfortunate
things,
someone
can
say
it's
the
harsh
reality
many
students
face.
AB
However,
today
we
can
help
change
that,
although
my
story
is
important,
just
like
the
many
others
you
will
hear
today.
I
am
coming
here
to
Advocate
and
speak
on
behalf
of
the
student
members
of
DNC,
the
volvenos,
a
neighborhood
organization
structured
by
me,
and
several
supporting
members
advocating
for
Change
and
prioritizing
our
community
safety
and
upkeep
since
late
2021.
AB
There
are
four
members
within
our
neighborhood
organization
that
are
currently
or
have
recently
attended,
ksjc
or
the
neighboring
School
institutions.
These
students,
whom
have
attended
neighboring
schools
and
ksgc,
have
had
all
their
own
personal
experiences
and
safety
concerns
regarding
the
RV
situation
and
the
risk
factors
that
are
present
among
them.
Ashley
villetta
and
her
little
sister
can
no
longer
walk
home
due
to
the
Past
Experiences,
where
they
have
seen.
AB
Rv
residents
yell
hurtful
comments
to
them
walking
past
due
to
the
stories
and
the
RV
residents
in
our
area
near
the
schools
they
feel
like
they
can
no
longer
walk
the
15-minute
path
to
their
school
Angela.
A
member
of
DNC
wasn't
able
to
attend
today,
but
informed
me
that
she
herself
has
seen
multiple
times
where
RV
residents
have
attempted
to
provoke
students.
Thank
you
next
speaker.
AC
We
wrote
a
letter
opposing
this
memo.
We
are
an
organization
that
has
worked
with
youth
for
more
than
20
years
and
we
support
families
who
have
loved
ones
incarcerated,
and
we
know
too
well
that
impacts
to
entire
families
and
our
communities
when
loved
ones
get
entangled
in
the
criminal
legal
system.
We
are
all
for
protecting
youth
for
protecting
everyone
in
this
city,
but
criminalizing
our
unhoused
neighbors
for
things
that
already
carry
legal
consequences
is
not
the
answer.
AC
This
city
struggles
so
much
to
actually
move
forward
policies
that
prevent
homelessness,
that
support
families
that
meet
their
needs,
but
then
is
willing
to
fast-track
a
ban
when
there
is
nowhere
to
relocate
the
people,
because
this
isn't
about
RVs
and
encampments.
It's
about
people
and
entire
families
with
children
that
often
live
in
those
RVs
there's
nowhere
to
put
them.
We
cannot
criminalize
our
way
to
safety.
Please
reject
this
memo
and
its
direction,
and
it
really
feels
walking
in
here,
like
you
are
socializing
us
to
be.
AC
You
know
just
to
accept
this
with
the
metal
detectors
and
the
wanding
just
to
participate
in
this
conversation.
It's
so
unnecessary.
It
doesn't
feel
good.
It
feels
criminalizing
itself
because,
if
I'm
going
to
be
wanted,
every
single
time,
I
come
in
here
with
my
colleagues
the
folks
on
here
that
I
that
sit
here
in
the
suits
and
I
watch
them
go
in.
They
don't
have
to
open
their
bags.
They
don't
get
wanted,
do
it
to
everybody
or
don't
do
it
at
all.
AC
AD
Good
afternoon,
council,
members
and
staff,
my
name
is
Chris
coppolilo.
My
role
is
managing
director
of
policy,
enrollment
advocacy
and
Community
engagement
at
KIPP,
Public,
Schools,
Northern,
California
and
I'm
here
in
support
of
the
San
Jose
Collegiate
students
that
you've
heard
from
already
and
we'll
hear
from
more
I'm,
going
to
read
from
a
letter
that
Kip
Northern
California,
submitted
yesterday,
together
with
school
leaders
at
two
co-located
schools
on
the
Independence
High
School
campus
to
members
of
this
committee
members,
the
presence
of
unhoused
individuals
seeking
basic
amenities
such
as
using
our
bathrooms
during
the
school
day.
AD
A
situation
we
observed
more
than
once
last
year
highlights
pressing
issues
of
equity
and
social
responsibility,
while
our
hearts
reach
out
in
understanding
and
compassion
for
these
community
members,
it's
equally
crucial
to
ensure
that
our
students
have
a
safe
and
uninterrupted
space
for
learning
the
recurring
nature
of
these
incidents
underscores
the
urgent
need
for
more
inclusive
Solutions
in
our
broader
Community.
As
we
work
towards
addressing
these
challenges,
our
priority
remains
to
provide
a
secure
and
conducive
learning
environment
for
our
students,
while
also
advocating
for
resources
and
support
for
the
unhoused
council
members.
AD
The
issue
of
how
we
ensure
a
safe
learning
environment
for
our
students,
while
remaining
attuned
to
the
needs
of
everyone
in
our
community,
is
worth
a
discussion
by
the
full
Council.
We
appreciate
the
committee's
consideration
of
this
item,
look
for
and
look
forward
to
opportunities
for
continued
partnership,
learning
and
discussion
on
the
issue,
we're
an
educational
institution
and
that's
our
priority.
Thank
you.
AE
AF
If
anyone
had
told
me
back
in
2009
when
I
was
bringing
my
son
home
from
the
hospital
that
I'd
be
standing
before
this
Council
on
his
very
first
day
of
high
school
I
would
have
been
actually
kind
of
heartbroken.
To
be
honest.
Nevertheless,
here
I
am
asking
you
to
support
the
students
of
KIPP
San
Jose
Collegiate
in
calling
for
a
policy
that
would
create
a
secure
and
focused
learning
environment
for
our
school.
Our
kids
deserve
learning
environments,
free
from
risks,
distractions
and
fear.
I.
AF
AG
AG
You
know,
I
think
that
you
know
there
should
be
like
a
lot
better
planning
for
the
people
that
don't
have
a
place
to
live
either
I'm
always
talking
about
how
they
should
probably
build
a
resort
or
two
one
for
ones
that
are
hooked
on
drugs,
ones
that
one
for
ones
that
are
trying
to
clean
up
and
move
on
from
that
that
type
of
life-
and
you
know
not
to
criminalize
them
or
anything
but
I-
think
the
Safety
and
Security
of
the
children
is
first
and
foremost
not.
AG
I
Hi,
poor
Beekman
thanks
a
lot
for
the
words
from
people
from
search.
It's
my
feeling
that
the
metal
detectors
issue
should
be
kind
of
a
a
temporary
solution,
an
idea-
and
we
should
be
in
that
mind-
frame
because
really
nice
words
are
spoken.
It's
a
pain
to
deal
with
those
metal
detectors.
We
should
be
in
a
better
mind
frame
to
consider
them
as
temporary,
not
permanent.
I
Thank
you
to
the
students
who've
spoken
today.
I
mean
they've,
made
clear
that
they're
having
problems
and
it's
something's
gone
wrong
and
it's
uncomfortable
with
the
especially
at
the
educational,
Park
School.
I
It's
I
feel
it's
now
time.
It's
from
that
that
we
have
to
really
consider
good
decision
making
and
what
was
also
spoken
by
Serge
about
two
persons
from
surge
just
spoke
of
how
it
needs
to
be
a
people
effort.
We
need
to
consider
Community
projects,
Community
thinking,
I,
hope
there
can
be
ways.
Housing
staff
can
talk
to
the
RV
people
campers
themselves
and
and
find
people
within
the
RV
Community.
Who
can
we
can
learn
to
develop
better
skills?
I
Obviously,
something's
gone
a
little
wrong
and
we
have
to
talk
about
you
know
living
in
a
neighborhood
and
what
that
entails.
We
have
to
work
on
the
RV,
say,
parking
issues
and
with
me,
being
in
San
Diego
right
now,
we're
dealing
with
encampment
issues
and
ordinance
issues
that
are
pretty
stringent
and
they're
a
bit
off
the
mark
and
I
guess:
I
think
you
guys
know
that,
and
what
can
we
do?
How
can
we
do
it
better
here
in
San,
Jose
they're
using
police
as
like
a
major
front
line
usage
with
their
encampment
issues?
I
E
Good
afternoon
my
name's
Aldo
Carmona
and
I
represent
Kip
San
Jose
collegiate
I
support
the
recommendation
in
the
memo
and
I
urge
you
to
please
pass
the
item.
Thank
you.
AE
AH
Name
is
Christian
manres
and
I
live
in
the
east
side
bay
area.
Correct
and
I
have
multiple
events
of
homeless
people
coming
into
my
home
and
destroying
my
property.
Giving
me
an
unsafe
home
already
and
I
have
to
deal
with
this
every
single
day
going
to
school
already,
knowing
that
I
have
to
deal
with
either
a
school
shooting
or
homeless
people
coming
into
our
school.
AH
So
I
recommend
that
you
pass
this
memo
in
order
to
think
about
the
students
or
where
they
have
to
deal
with
homeless
people
outside
their
homes
and
at
school,
because
all
you
should
know
about
school
is
labeled
as
a
safe
haven,
even
though
it's
not
anymore.
So
please
I,
ask
urgently
that
you
pass
this
memo
to
think
about
school
safety
and
students
as
well.
Thank
you.
AI
U
H
H
AJ
AK
Hi
I'm
Deborah,
St,
Julian
I
live
in
District,
2
and
I'm,
a
member
of
showing
up
for
racial
Justice,
speaking
in
solidarity
with
survivors
of
the
street
and
the
race,
equity
and
Public
Safety,
Committee
and
I'm.
Also
speaking
as
a
person
of
Faith,
whose
teacher
called
us
to
love
our
neighbors
as
ourself
I
agree
with
Liz
Gonzalez
at
Silicon,
Valley
debug
that
we
cannot
criminalize
our
way
to
safety.
AK
I
feel
bad
for
are
over
nine
thousand
brothers
and
sisters
who
do
not
have
housing
in
San,
Jose
and
I
feel
bad
for
these
students
who
are
experiencing
the
consequences
of
our
failure
as
adults
to
address
the
housing
crisis.
But
instead
of
criminalizing
our
homeless
brothers
and
sisters,
I
ask
us
to
model
new
ways
to
address
the
issues
in
using
Community
processes
to
communicate
with
each
other.
Like
Matt
mahan's
talking
about
his
Initiative
for
in
together,
San
Jose.
AK
These
unhoused
folks
are
not
all
I
mean.
As
someone
else
said,
you
know
they
got
pushed
out
of
their
housing.
They
might
have
medical
needs,
so
we
need
to
speak
to
each
other
and
create
community-based
processes,
and
we
also
need
to
create
safe
parking
so
that
these
brothers
and
sisters
don't
have
to
park
on
the
street.
There
is
no
place
to
sweep
these
people.
AK
I
live
in
a
community
where
we
I
my
my
kids,
went
to
Davis
and
Andrew
Hill
and
walked
by
homeless
people
still
and
there
we
need
to
address
this
at
you
know:
Upstream,
where
it's
what
the
causes
are
and
continuing
to
criminalize
and
sweep
people
does
not
solve
things
and,
let's
model
better
solutions
for
our
kids
here
and
I
applaud
the
kids
for
coming
and
talking.
Thank
you.
AL
Good
afternoon
I'm
Catherine
Hedges
I
live
in
District,
3
and
I'm.
Also
a
member
of
surge
of
Sam
affiliations.
I
really
feel
for
the
students.
This
sounds
like
a
really
bad
situation
for
them,
but
I
don't
know
how
it's
going
to
solve
the
problem,
to
move
them
120
feet
further
away.
They're
still
going
to
be
able
to
you
know
anybody
who's
going
to
make
trouble
is
still
going
to
make
trouble
and
it
seems
like
if
we
had
a
neighborhood
watch
that
could
crack
down
and
be
like
hey.
AL
If
you're
going
to
yell
at
the
students,
you
have
to
leave
hey.
What
are
you
doing
going
on
campus?
You
know
if
they
need
bathrooms,
get
them
porta
potties
like
we
did
during
the
pandemic.
We
have
porta
potties
and
hygiene
stations
and
or
have
you
know,
and
we
don't
have
a
place
to
sweep
people
too,
and
the
problem
is
the
behavior
and
if
we
make
it
clear
that
people
can't
stay
there,
if
they're,
you
know
harassing
the
students
or
going
on
campus
or
whatever
bad
behavior
they're
committing
and
they
leave.
AL
Then
you
know
encampment,
you
know
good
encampment
sites
always
fill
up
again
and
if
we
eliminate
the
people
who
are
making
problems,
then
the
people
who
are
just
you
know
unable
to
rent
an
apartment
and
live
in
an
RV,
the
people
with
disabilities
and
people
with
part-time
jobs
or
whatever
they
could.
You
know,
have
informal
community
in
collaboration
with
the
surrounding
Community
homeowners
and
renters
and
stuff,
but
we
need
to
it.
AL
AM
Well,
my
name
is
Debbie
owl
I
live
in
District
Seven
I'm,
a
member
of
show
up
for
racial
Justice
at
Sacred,
Heart
and
I'm,
speaking
in
solidarity
with
the
race,
equity
and
Community
Safety,
Committee
and
survivors
of
the
street,
which
are
all
familiar
affiliated
with
Sacred
Heart
I'm
concerned
that
people
living
in
encampments
are
being
treated
as
criminals
and
will
be
forced
to
move
from
their
homes
by
police
action.
The
needs
of
these
people
are
not
being
met
and
we
have
failed
them,
and
we
have
also
failed
these
students
who
have
spoken
here
today.
AM
AM
AN
And
let's
take
the
time
to
think
about
how
we
can
really
accomplish
that
goal
and
how
we
can
accomplish
that
goal
together.
How
we
can
incorporate
the
students
and
residents
whether
housed
or
unhoused,
near
the
Kipp
School
being
talked
about
today
or
any
other
school
in
our
city,
about
what
safety
looks
like
for
people
and
how
we
can
all
take
responsibility
for
that
in
a
way
that
does
not
involve
the
police
in
a
way
that
does
not
criminalize
people
in
a
way
that
does
not
push
people
farther
away
from
safe
and
safe
and
stable
housing.
AN
It's
been
pretty
clear
from
the
students
testimony
that
there's
some
strong
emerging
leaders
in
this
community
and
I
would
like
to
invite
them
to
talk
with
us
and
talk
to
other
people
in
the
community
about
what
safety
can
look
like
without
involving
the
police
without
criminalizing
people
and
as
I've
been
doing
for
a
while
want
to
encourage
our
city,
council
and
other
city
leaders
to
get
out
of
this
mindset
that
police,
equal
safety
and
to
think
about
what
we
can
be
doing
differently.
Thank
you.
AO
Hi,
my
name
is
Andrew
Siegler
and
I
am
with
Serge
at
Sacred,
Heart
and
I'm
speaking
in
solidarity
with
survivors
of
the
streets
and
the
race
Equity
Community,
Safety
Committee,
so
I'm,
a
formerly
unhoused
individual
and
I,
can
tell
you
being
out
there
sucks
it
really
sucks.
Now.
AO
I
also
remember
being
a
kid
and
feeling
unsafe
at
various
times
in
my
life,
and
that
also
sucks-
and
the
thing
is,
homelessness-
is
a
symptom
of
the
fact
that
rent
and
housing
are
far
too
expensive
in
this
city,
I
mean
this
city
has
lost
70
000
people
in
the
last
four
years,
moving
to
other
places,
because
it's
too
expensive
and
then
there's
the
people
that
couldn't
move
and
they're
out
on
the
streets.
Now
and
now
our
students,
our
children,
are
suffering
from
the
bone-headed
policy
decisions
that
led
to
mass
homelessness.
AO
So
how
about
stop
this
whole
idea
of
criminalizing
people
and
creating
bans
and
150
foot
barriers
between
you
know,
I
mean
this
is
nonsense.
It's
at
it's
utter
nonsense
and
it's
morally
reprehensible,
and
it's
not
going
to
make
the
students
safer.
It's
not
going
to
make
anybody
in
the
community
safer.
It's
not
going
to
make
the
homeless
people
safer.
It's
not
gonna
get
homeless
people
closer
to
getting
housing,
but
you
know
making
policy
that
streamlines,
affordable
housing
and
putting
rent
control
that
will
solve
the
problem
so
think
about
that.
Don't
pass!
AP
AP
No,
the
Samaritan
manages
the
victim,
treats
him
with
mercy
and
then
moves
the
victim
to
safety.
Everyone
in
our
community
is
our
neighbor.
We
don't
get
to
pick,
who
is
our
neighbor
school
students,
those
who
have
spoken
today?
Other
students
and
the
unsheltered
all
should
be
treated
with
mercy
and
all
deserve
safety.
So
my
question
is,
and
it's
a
hard
one,
it's
a
lot
harder
than
just
getting
more
police
out
there
is.
How
will
you
love
and
support
our
unsheltered
neighbors
by
engaging
the
whole
Community,
including
these
students,
in
dialogue,
without
involving
law
enforcement?
AP
AQ
Hi
good
afternoon,
well,
here
we
go
again
criminalizing
my
unhoused
friend
living
outside
I
have
been
going
out
to
educational
part
meeting
with
the
unhoused
RV
folks
living
there,
and
never
once
have
I
felt
unsafe.
In
fact,
I
felt
very
respectful.
They
were
very
respectful
towards
me.
I
also
want
to
inform
you
I'm
sure
some
of
you
know
that,
maybe,
if
you've
been
out
there,
there
are
five
large
truckers
living
out
there.
AQ
What
I
don't
understand
is
why
would
people
living
inside
an
RV
sleep
on
full
ground
when
they
have
a
little
home
to
go
to
or
sleep
in
the
school
bathroom
that
I
don't
understand,
but
I
would
like
to
ask
and
councilman
Ortiz
and
somebody
from
the
mayor's
office
if,
if
they
would
like
to
meet
with
myself
and
and
as
student
Alfredo
Hernandez
sir,
if
you
would
like
to
meet
with
the
unhoused
folks
there,
let's
have
a
meeting
and
sit
down
and
talk
to
them
with
some
of
your
students
and
yourself
of
course,
and
see
what
can
be
worked
out
in
the
interim
and
I.
AQ
Think
that
would
be
very
important,
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
have
met
any
of
them,
but
the
unhoused
that
I
have
met
out.
There
have
been
very
nice
also.
We
have
to
look
at
the
truckers.
I'm,
sorry,
but
you
know
the
unhows
are.
Are
you
know
a
group
of
people
that
everybody
points
their
fingers
at
and
if
you're
interested
in
that
Alfredo
council
member
Ortiz,
has
my
information?
I
would
love
to
set
that
up?
Thank
you
back.
B
All
right
well,
thank
you.
Everyone
for
the
comment.
I
I'm
always
particularly
encouraged
when
I
see
thoughtful
smart
students
showing
up
and
sharing
their
input.
It
was
great
to
hear
your
comments
as
part
of
this
discussion
today.
I
I
am
one
of
the
people
who
signed
on
to
this
memo.
So
I'll
just
talk
about
it
briefly
and
then
open
up
for
other
discussion
amongst
the
council
members.
B
Most
of
my
colleagues
here
you
know
I
we
had
a
discussion
I
remember
when
it
was
a
year
year
and
a
half
ago
about
a
buffer
zone
around
schools
which
was
150
feet
buffer
zone
for
homeless
encampments.
Around
schools,
I
was
uncomfortable
at
that
time
and
I
expressed
it
at
that
meeting
because
to
me
150
feet
seemed
arbitrary
and,
and
there
was
and
there's
sometimes
locations
within
150
feet
that
might
even
be
safer
for
students
walking
to
and
from
school
than
the
200
feet
or
250
feet
and
I
was
concerned
about.
B
Where
would
people
go
as
they
were
moved
out
from
around
schools?
And
so
we
have
to
be
thoughtful
about
any
policy
we
put
in
place
and
I
for
consistency
signed
on
to
the
concept
of.
If
we're
going,
to
have
a
150
foot
buffer
zone
around
schools
that
it
ought
to
include
RVs
just
like
it
does
encampments,
because
it
doesn't
really
make
sense
to
to
do
it
for
one
and
and
have
a
policy
that
doesn't
apply
that
the
same.
B
I
still
have
about
how
this
policy
will
play
out,
what
the
enforcement
will
be
and
whether
there
could
even
be
enforcement,
how
it
could
work
I'm
concerned
about
putting
the
cart
before
the
horse
a
little
bit,
because
we've
been
pushing
really
hard
to
find
locations
to
move
people
and
I've
been
very
uncomfortable,
saying:
let's
have
people
move
until
we
have
something
to
offer
them
as
a
place
to
go,
and
unfortunately,
we'll
have
this
conversation
in
other
places
about
the
timeline
for
our
safe
RV
parking
sites,
they're
not
coming
along
as
fast
as
we'd
like,
and
we
don't
yet
have
enough
space
for
them.
B
B
M
Thank
you,
chair
Lee,
Wilcox
assistant
city
manager,
good
to
see
so
many
of
you
here
with
us
today.
The
early
consideration
form
does
green
light.
The
policy
and
program
design
work
so
that
it
can
come
forward
in
90
days.
Obviously
chair,
as
you've
pointed
out,
there's
some
policy
considerations
that
you
guys
can
can
make
in
90
days
as
well
as
particulars
around
program,
design
and
costs
that
you
would
want
to
know.
M
We
will
be
pushing
the
the
larger
implementation
of
that
if
Council
wants
to
have
that
conversation
in
90
days,
which
would
align
with
the
budget
process,
because
there
ultimately
would
probably
be
resources
to
implement
some
of
this
based
off
of
what
the
program
design
does
look
like
with
that
said,
Omar
passons
and
I
have
chatted.
We
are
going
to
work
with
staff
looking
at
existing
tools,
and
you
know
the
existing
code
that
we
have
to
see
what
can
be
done,
in
particular
at
this
site.
B
All
right,
thank
you.
I
know
we
had
representative
McKenzie
representing
the
mayor's
office
on
Zoom,
if
you
have
can
just
in
one
minute,
if
you
want
to
add
anything
to
the
context
of
the
memo
before
we
continue.
The
discussion
on
the
committee.
R
Thank
you
chair.
Nothing
really
to
add
in
terms
of
context.
I
did
want
to
thank
all
of
the
students
at
KIPP
accounts,
member
Ortiz
for
working
with
us
on
this
and
I.
Think
you
summarized
it
well.
We
when
we
started
looking
into
this
issue
with
the
students.
We
realized
that,
while
we
had
the
150
foot
buffer
zone
for
encampments,
that
didn't
include
RVs,
because
they
are
technically
legally
distinct.
R
So
we'll
really
just
speak
seeking
consistency,
but
within
our
encampment
management
strategy
to
apply
this
school
buffer
zone
to
encampments
and
RVs,
so
that
we
can
guarantee
that
students
feel
safe
when
they're
walking
to
campus
and
when
they're
at
school
they
have
a
distraction,
free
environment
and
to
this
issue
of
resources,
we
recognize
that
staff
resources
are
limited,
but
we're
hopeful
that
we
can
take
a
phase
approach
to
implementation.
Considering
not
every
school,
Child,
Care,
Facility
or
daycare
in
San
Jose
is
impacted
by
RV
encampments.
So
thank
you
for
the
time.
B
All
right,
thank
you.
Casper
Foley,.
J
Thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
take
the
opportunity,
as
a
parent
and
former
School
Board
member,
to
say
truly
how
proud
I
am
of
the
students
that
are
here
advocating
for
yourselves
for
your
safety,
for
the
students
around
you
and
for
the
community
of
KIPP
and
actually
Independent
high
school.
That
I
think
has
a
attendance
population
of
about
four
thousand.
It's
a
big
school!
It's
a
big
school!
Is
your
teacher
here.
J
No
okay,
I
just
wanted
okay,
I
just
wanted
to
acknowledge
and
praise
the
teachers
for
encouraging
your
students
to
take
this
path
and
students.
I
was
extremely
impressed
on
what
you
had
to
say
and
I
completely
agree
with
you
that
you
need
to
feel
safe
in
your
environment.
Schools
unfortunately
aren't
feeling
that
safe
anymore,
but
we
should
do
everything
we
can
to
help
make
them
safe
havens,
continue
to
make
them
safe
havens.
For
you
with
that,
are
you
ready
for
a
motion
or
no
okay?
J
I
would
move
acceptance
of
the
item
and
have
it
placed
on
the
council
agenda
for
August
15th.
B
O
Thank
you.
One
of
the
things
that's
clear
to
me.
I
I
also
want
to
thank
the
students
and
the
community
members
who
participated
on
today's
meeting.
O
I
I
think
it's
very
clear
that
there's
a
there's
a
concern
about
criminalizing
homelessness
and
living
in
our
in
RVs
and
I
think
that
the
intent
is
not
to
so
I
I
think
that
that's
an
emphasis
that
I
think
we
should
put
into
it
and
I,
don't
know
if
it
makes
I
mean
they're
already,
laws
on
the
books
and
ordinances
that
prohibit
certain
activities,
criminal
activities
and-
and
this
is
really
a
draft
ordinance
for
that
would
be
non-criminal.
I
mean
the
intent
as
I
see.
O
It
is
not
to
create
criminalizing
RVs
or
parking
RVs,
so
I
think
I
think
that
that
needs
to
be
really
spelled
out
and
if
we
wanted
to
put
that
in
there
in
terms
of
a
draft
non-criminal
ordinance,
I
don't
know
if
it
makes
a
difference,
because
I
do
know
that
an
ordinance
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
give
that
criminal
criminal
tone,
but
but
I
think
that
it's
it's
becoming
very
clear
to
me
that
it's
an
important
factor
so
I
think
that,
if
we're
going
to
give
direction
to
the
city
manager
to
come
back
in
90
days,
that
the
intent
is
really
non-criminal
ordinance
as
opposed
to
what
people
may
have
in
their
minds
as
to
what
what
exactly
we
want
to
do,
because
that
is
that
you
know
that
is
not
the
intent
of
what
I
heard
today
and
I.
O
Don't
think
that
anybody
wants
to
do
that.
So
I
don't
know
if
we
have
to
add
anything
or
if
there's
just
consensus
or
understanding.
But
I
think
that
it's
important
to
highlight
that
part,
because
I
think
that
that
is
what
people
want.
We
do
want
our
students
to
be
safe.
We
want
our
community
to
be
safe,
but
we
all
we
want
our
entire
Community,
even
those
living
in
RVs
to
be
safe
as
well.
There
are
those
circumstances
that
have
caused
students
to
feel
fearful.
O
You
know
I
mean
breaking
in
and
doing
all
of
these
other
things,
but
there
are
laws
on
the
books
to
be
able
to
deal
with
that
and
and
I
know
that
our
staff
is
is
very
mindful
of
that,
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
emphasis.
Thank
you.
B
Yeah,
thank
you.
Vice
mayor
I
think
that's
important
context
that
that
I,
that
our
ordinances,
don't
aren't
are
all
criminal
I
mean
we
have
parking,
ordinances
and
all
ordinances
about
rules
that
we
must
follow,
and
so
this
is
I
think
would
be
in
the
spirit
of
a
parking
ordinance,
but
we
still
have
to
leave
that
up
to
the
staff
to
figure
out
exactly
the
spirit
of
that.
How
that
how
that
is,
written,
councilmember,
Jimenez.
D
Yeah,
thank
you.
It's
very
clear
to
me
that
the
the
teachers
and
staff
at
KIPP
and
I
suspect
that
some
of
the
other
schools
have
really
and
which
I
think
is
a
good
thing
by
the
way,
but
have
really
taken
this
opportunity
to
have
this,
be
a
learning
opportunity
for
the
students
and
coming
up
here
and
speaking
in
front
of
the
some
of
the
council,
a
lot
of
folks
to
actually
never
step
into
this
chamber
and
don't
really
know
what
the
heck
goes
on
at
the
city.
So
I
think
even
that
is
is
important.
D
D
In
fact,
some
of
the
folks
that
have
commented
online
as
well
as
some
of
the
folks
that
are
here,
including
some
of
the
folks
from
debug
as
an
example
to
actually
engage
a
lot
of
these
residents
and
maybe
have
a
meeting
in
which
you
actually
have
a
discussion
with
some
of
the
people
that
are
living
in
the
RVs.
So
that
way,
you
can
better
understand
the
situation
and
the
circumstances
that
have
led
them
to
be
in
that
particular
space
and
I.
Think
that
is,
could
be
a
very
amazing
sort
of
extension
of
this
learning
opportunity.
D
Nationwide
in
the
state
and
here
in
the
city,
and
so
just
wanted
to
express
that
the
other
thing
I
would
say
is
I,
went
to
Independence,
High,
School
and
I
know.
A
D
Know
this
area
very
well
and
my
two
of
my
kids
went
to
KIPP
Hartwood
Academy
and
they
didn't
go
to
keep
typical
Egypt,
but
I
have
to
say
that
I
am
was
impressed
by
the
the
students
that
have
come
through
the
KIPP
Schools.
If
you
will
and-
and
today
was
no
exception
and
being
impressed
with
just
the
the
your
ability
to
come
up
here
and
share
some
of
your
thoughts
and
comments
in
a
very,
very
clear
and
concise
way.
D
I
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
continue
to
be
impressed
by
the
caliber
of
students
and
I
have
no
doubt
that
many
of
you
are
going
to
go
off
to
do
a
lot
of
great
things,
but
to
that
I
would
encourage
you
to
stay
engaged.
This
topic
isn't
going
to
go
away.
Assuming
this
policy
actually
is
implemented,
as
we
expect
it
will
that
100
100
feet.
You
know
foot
buffer
and
such
you're
not
going
to
stop
seeing
some
of
the
people
that
are
living
in
the
RVs.
D
You
know
unhoused
and
so
I
think
it's
it'd
be
great
for
you
to
continue
to
be
engaged
and
I
would
really
encourage
that.
Thank
you
for
being
here.
B
Well
said,
council
member,
before
we
move
on
to
the
vote,
I
just
want
to
add
a
couple
of
other
thoughts
that
I've
had
as
we
as
I
think.
Through
this
memo
there
are
on
the
on
the
early
iteration
Forum
staff
has
identified
1012
sites
that
fall
under
this
ordinance,
presumably
because
their
daycare
schools,
you
know
we,
the
scope
of
this-
is,
is
very
large
and
and
I,
don't
think.
B
So
it's
you
know
it's
it's
all.
It's
all
connected
I,
you
know
I
think
if
we
think
about
coming
back
with
a
policy,
that's
talking
about
being
targeted
in
our
approach
being
make
using
some
judgment
about
where
are
the
right
places
and
where
are
some
places
that
we
should
not
have
RVs
parking
on
the
street
as
opposed
to
saying
we're,
creating
some
kind
of
blanket
rule
that
we
have
to
strictly
enforce
everywhere.
B
That,
to
me,
is
what
I'm
interested
in
more
than
a
policy
that
says
you
know
this
is
the
rule
and
and
it's
it's
not
really
being
thoughtful
and
how
we
might
be
successful
in
in
following
that
rule.
So
I
don't
know
if
it
necessarily
want
to
change
the
motion,
but
I
just
want
staff
to
sort
of
think
in
that.
B
B
D
M
I
would
suggest
we're
more
than
open
to
that.
I
would
suggest
that,
after
90
days,
if
the
council
likes
the
policy
and
where
we
would
be
going,
we
would
be
asking
to
do
some
level
of
priority
or
resource
setting,
as
part
of
that,
so
I
think
it'd
be
most
appropriate
after
Council
weighs
in
on
the
policy.
B
Well,
thank
you
and
that's
a
good
suggestion.
All
right,
we'll
move
into
a
vote
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
opposed
all
right
that
carries.
Thank
you.
Everyone
thank
you
for
being
here.
That
brings
us
to
our
final
agenda
item,
which
is
item
C2
audit
office
of
Retirement
Services
I
guess
one
of
the
two
off
co-authors
would
like
to
start
and
then
you
can
go
to
public
or
okay
we'll
go
to
public
comment.
First
on
this
item,
if
there's
any
clear.
I
Hi
player
Beekman,
your
cells
offered
some
really
nice
Dialogue
on
the
dice
on
the
previous
item.
Thank
you
for
this
item.
I
wanted
to
go
over
that
back
in
2021,
I
guess
in
the
spring
and
late
winter
after
the
George
Floyd
things,
there
was
a
big
deal
about
raises
for
police
and
it's
set
in
motion
at
that
time.
Back
in
2021,
yes,
I
am
at
the
Retirement
Services
Board
I'm.
I
Sorry,
if
I
didn't
start
there,
this
was
brought
to
the
Retirement
Services
Board
of
these
sort
of
questions
and
and
they
were
trying
to
Define
how
to
talk
about
the
future
of
inflation
issues
that
the
police
Union
issue
had
a
set
in
motion.
An
inflation
course
that
Retirement
Board
people
were
trying
to
address
back
in
2021.
I
We
have
to
be
really
cautious.
How
we
give
raises
I
feel
I'm
really
sorry
to
make
this
point,
but
we
really
have
to,
and
the
Retirement
Board
does
some
incredibly
good
work
and
they
do
incredibly
decent
reporting
of
what
to
expect
in
upcoming
years,
and
that
was
inhibited
because
of
the
police
Union
things
a
few
years
ago.
I
I
just
hope
we
don't
make
the
same
sort
of
mistakes
with
how
you're
in
negotiations
right
now
and
that
ways
that
we
can
all
you
know
a
12
raise
can
be
reached
in
the
end,
but
maybe
just
the
different
ways
to
reach
that
end.
I
Thanks
for
your
time,
and
thanks
for
your
patience
and
hearing
me
on
this
item,
oh
and
thank
you
to
the
board
too
I
think
just
a
reminder
of
the
Retirement
Board.
They
do
some
really
important
good
work
for
ourselves.
So
thank
you
to
them.
B
Right
council,
member
Davis.
P
Thank
you,
councilmember
Foley
and
I
are
the
Liaisons
to
the
retirement
boards
and
we
have
last
had
an
audit
for
them
in
2017
they
had
an
internal
audit
with
some
concerning
findings,
and
so
that
was
the
the
reasoning
for
our
our
memo
here.
Joe,
you
did
have
a
part
of
this
already
on
your
work
plan.
I
just
wanted.
If
it's
okay
with
you
to
come
down
and
comment
on
the
other,
the
other
items
that
were
on
here.
AR
So
one
of
the
earlier
items
on
the
consent
calendar
was
our
was
our
work
plan.
We
were
requested
by
the
administration
to
look
at
kind
of
the
administrative
functions
and
kind
of
the
the
governance
structure
around
some
of
those
administrative
operational
questions.
Some
of
those
items
that
were
brought
up
within
that
audit
that
you
mentioned
from
the
ORS
is
that
Retirement
Services
internal
audit,
which
is
very
close
to
what
is.
AR
At
number
four
here
and
as
that
work
was
I,
had
a
team
kind
of
freeing
up,
they'd,
already
kind
of
begun.
Some
of
that
benchmarking.
What
have
you
so
it
could?
It
is
very
much
in
line
with
some
work,
that's
kind
of
underway,
at
least
that
fourth
piece,
the
items
one
through
three,
the
identifying
and
control
processes
and
policies,
and
then
compliance
some
of
that
testing,
that's
a
little
broader
set
of
works.
B
I
Hello,
Blair
Beekman
thanks
a
lot
for
the
meeting
today,
you
guys
did
some
nice
work.
It
was
just
nice
to
hear
yourselves
about
bringing
back
the
Community
energy
things.
Good
luck
in
how
to
talk
about
is
more
than
stakeholders,
but
as
public
I
think
that
was
tried
to
be
mentioned
today.
How
do
you
bring
the
public
into
the
process?
Overall,
thanks
a
lot
again
from
yesterday.
You
know
you
gave
the
woman
who
I've
been
learning
you've
been
talking
to
for
months
over
the
issue.
I
Clearly,
things
are
understood,
but
only
a
24-hour
notice
is
still
a
bit
uncomfortable
and
I.
Think
I
think
a
72-hour
notice
should
be
the
standard
way
you
guys
should
work
and
Good
Luck
how
to
work
in
that
way
in
the
future,
like
I'm,
saying
in
being
from
San
Diego
right
now,
they're
working
on
encampment
issues,
that's
gone
way
overboard
with
police
emphasis
when
it
could
be
housing
staff,
it
could
be
housing
first
Solutions,
you
know
non-profit
agency
solutions.
I
That
could
really
be
the
first
front
line
of
how
to
really
address
these
things
and
good
luck.
How
we're
going
to
be
trying
to
be
doing
that
here
and
learning
from
the
mistakes
of
other
cities,
which
I
think
you
guys
did
really
well
here
today?
Thank
you
from
the
issues
of
I
learned
something
really
interesting
today
about
democracy
and
that
in
Haiti,
new
police
are
coming
in
from
Kenya
to
deal
with
their
country's
problems,
but
it
isn't
the
policing
that's
needed
in
there.
I
It's
the
concepts
of
democracy
and
it
just
brought
home
if
they
want
to
work
on
Democracy.
If
we
want
to
in
that
area,
we
can,
we
should
be
doing
the
same
things
here.
We
have
good,
you
know,
guidelines
and
about
tech,
accountability,
issues
that
can
really
ferment
good,
participatory
democracy
and
Community
energy
issues
as
well.
So
good
luck,
how
we
work
on
the
concepts
of
democracy
here
at
the
local
level,
I
think
it
can
be
something
impressive
for
this.
AS
Hello,
council,
members
and
all
the
committee,
the
rules
and
government
committee,
just
for
your
information
back
in
2020
I,
had
a
stroke
and
a
recovering
is
still
from
that.
But
it's
too
much
for
me
to
wait
for
this
all
this
time,
but
it's
worth
it.
Thank
you,
council,
member
Cohen,
council,
member,
Jimenez
I.
Send
you
an
email
also
to
the
city
manager's
office.
I
had
an
issue
last
week
was
a
Monday,
the
31st
of
June
July,
my
son
and
I.
AS
Now
I
was
a
board
member
of
power
for
the
last
five
years
of
when
the
police
department
had
power
then
went
to
prns
so
on
this
email,
I
got
phone
calls,
including
the
chief
of
police,
including
the
the
deputy
chief,
but
there
is
no
a
solution
that
they
gave
me
the
encounter
with
this
particular
surgeon
that
his
name
is
in
here
and
in
my
email
says.
What
can
I
do
to
better
the
city
of
San
Jose,
and
then
they
put
a
person
to
call
me
from
a
prns.