►
Description
City of San José, California
Joint meeting of Rules and Open Government / Committee of the Whole of January 5, 2022
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=918686&GUID=ACFF064F-4921-4B71-A210-AE127DF8468C
A
B
B
C
D
C
C
C
C
C
C
A
A
I've
written
yourself
some
important
letters
about
how
all
various
cities,
at
this
time,
san,
jose
oakland
and
san
francisco
they're,
all
you
know
addressing
serious
law
enforcement
problems
and
and
in
connection
with
health
and
human
services,
ideas
and
needs,
and
I
I
just
think
it's
an
important
time
that
we
can,
as
as
new
law
enforcement
demands,
are
being
made.
We
really
consider
what
reimagine
is
at
this
time
and
and
better
develop
health
and
human
services
practices
for
the
all,
the
law,
enforcement
and
surveillance
technology
and
data
collection.
That's
going
to
be
happening
right
now.
A
It's
been
asked
for
right
now.
You
know
in
san
jose.
You
know
how
we
can
incorporate
this,
these
things
within
vision,
zero
and
then
within
division.
Zero
asks
that
you
know
it's
the
open
public
policy
ideas
and
guidelines
that
can
organize
a
really
good,
peaceful
process.
I
mean
on
an
honest
process
towards
peace,
and
I
think
that's
how
to
address
this
issue
and
work
towards
our
positive
future
and
community
practices
that
can
invite
you
know.
A
People
who
are
even
you
know
a
bit
on
the
outside
of
things,
to
invite
them
to
the
democratic
process
to
the
community
process.
So
good
luck,
how
we
can
do
this?
These
are
the
ideas
of
sustainability
and
harmony
that
are
so
important
to
community
and
vision,
zero
things.
So,
good
luck!
How
we
can
do
all
of
this
work
and
just
really
focus
on
on
the
open
public
policy.
Accountability.
Accountability
is
key
at
this
time.
I
hope
everyone
can
want
to
be
wants
to
be
involved
with
it.
Thank
you.
E
E
It
is
all
this
commercial
job
orientation.
We
have
to
focus
on
basic
needs,
and
that
is
food,
clothing
and
shelter.
And
so
that's
another
reason
to
not
go
forward
with
these
hotels,
because
that's
what
we
have
to
stop
doing
is
driving
and
flying
in
terms
of
our
climate
emergency.
As
we
have
seen
in
what
happened
in
the
urban
urban
issues
of
colorado,
they
were
all
vulnerable
to
the
severe
issues
of
climate
change
and,
like
blair,
said.
Preparation
is
what
we
have
to
start
focusing
on
and
even
in
the
issues
of
the
charcot.
E
You
know
we
should
not.
None
of
that
money
from
measure
b
should
be
going
towards
highways
that
are
made
out
of
cement
and
that
could
produce
greenhouse
gases
and
we're
seeing
the
impacts,
and
we
have
to
start
changing,
though,
as
as
we
go
forward
and
then
in
terms
of
our
our
charter
review
commission
that
it
didn't.
E
It
didn't,
approve
that
the
charter
would
accept
that
we
we
would
deal
with
our
climate
crisis
in
creating
a
climate
crisis
commission
that
would
lead
us
that
that's
what
extinction
rebellion
says
is
that
the
the
politicians
can't
do
this
and
that's
why
we're
in
the
world
to
hurt
that
it
has
to
be
the
science
as
we
go
forward,
because
physics
doesn't
lie
and
we
have
to
go
to
zero
and
so
that
that
needs
to
change.
We
need
to
have
that.
B
F
But,
secondly,
I
would
like
a
reprimand
for
tony
a
reprimand.
There
needs
to
be
a
consequence.
There's
no
agenda
placed
on
the
rules
list,
and
this
has
happened
too
many
times
so
much
so
that
we
had
an
actual
agenda
meeting
regarding
it.
So
I
would
like
her
formally
reprimanded.
There
has
to
be
a
consequence.
F
We
need
to
prepare
if
there
was
ever
a
time
where
there
must
be
preparation
for
what
is
to
come.
What
is
to
befall
the
chicano,
the
mexicano
in
the
low
income,
people
that
you
call
them
what
I
call
them
is
fellow
citizens
of
my
city,
you
call
them
low-income
people,
people
of
color
marginalized
communities,
racially
minorities.
This
is
what
you
call
them.
F
B
Hi,
can
you
hear
me
okay,
loud
and
clear?
Okay,
thank
you!
So
vice
mayor
jones
and
rules
committee
members,
my
name
is
gail
morman,
I'm
here
with
my
husband
tom
on
december
13th
we
and
our
neighbors
in
in
the
area
of
1212,
south
winchester
boulevard,
received
a
postcard
from
the
city
planning
division,
announcing
the
city
council
hearing
for
the
rezoning
and
special
use
permit
for
the
six-story
hotel
at
1212
south
winchester,
to
be
held
on
january
11th
at
6
pm
agenda
item
10.3.
B
H
C
C
D
C
G
D
There's
hi:
this
is
tony
tabor
city
clerk.
There's
two
issues
on
redistricting
on
the
agenda:
there's
the
first
one,
which
is
on
consent
calendar
it's
the
second
reading
of
the
ordinance
of
the
map
to
approve
the
boundaries
and
then
the
one
that's
on
the
ad
sheet
is
to
talk
about
the
process
for
the
the
redistricting
10
years
from
now,
it
was
to
go
over
sort
of
lessons
learned
suggestions
you
have
for
the
future.
It's
not
super
time
sensitive
to
be
heard
in
january.
G
G
C
Thank
you
councilmember
before
I
go
to
councilmember
cohen.
I
also
want
to
make
a
request
based
on
the
public
speaker's
comments
about
having
a
time
certain.
I
don't
think
we
should
have
a
precedent
of
moving
up
that
particular
item
before
the
other
land
use
items,
but
to
have
a
time
certain
for
all
land
use
items
at
six
o'clock.
J
When
is
the
best
meeting
in
terms
of
schedule,
because
I
could
see
the
discussion
taking
a
while,
although
in
reality
we
don't
have
to
have
specific
recommendations
now,
since
the
next
process
hasn't
happened
for
10
years,
so
I
without
having,
though
the
benefit
of
seeing
what
the
agendas
on
the
25th
and
early
february
look
like
it's
it's
hard
to
for
me
to
make
the
determination
of
which
meeting
it
would
be
best
suited
to
be
on.
So
do
we
have
some
visibility
angel
about?
J
I
I
D
I
don't
know
I
haven't.
I
don't
know
the
horizon
report,
that
gloria
knows
that
and
she's
out
she's
the
the
expert
on
the
future
items.
I
I
do
know
if
we
have
extra
time
for
this.
If
we
schedule
it
for
you
know,
sometime
in
february,
I
could
probably
bring
in
like
league
of
or
not
league
of
california
cities.
D
J
Yeah
that
makes
sense
to
me
you
know,
and
obviously
it's
flexible
so
that
if
other
agendas
start
to
get
really
busy
too,
we
can
always
move
them.
There's
a
couple
other
big
items,
though,
that
I
know
are
coming
forward
that
will
bring
a
lot
of
public
comments
coming
up
at
the
end
of
january
early
february.
J
G
When
is
the
best
state
since
we're
just
getting
back
on
track
and
started
on
this
calendar
year.
Most
of
the
committees
are
not
even
meeting
except
for
mine,
I'm
lucky
our
nsc
meeting
committee
is
still
happening
for
those
of
you
who
are
involved.
So
I
I
I'll
defer
that
conversation
to
staff
administration
and
drop
it
from
the
motion.
Okay,
thank
you
and.
C
C
G
A
A
I
don't
know
about
how
accurate
that
is,
I'm
going
to
try
this
here
to
better
incorporate
incorporate
that
within
the
idea
suggest
if
we
have
better
natural
disaster
protections
that
can
be
a
part
of
a
whole
series
of
health
and
human
services,
good
practices,
you
know
that
I
think
can
be
important
and
meaningful
for
ourselves
and
how
we
address
our
future.
It's
not
in
terms
of
law
enforcement,
it's
in
terms
of
community
public
health
and
safety
and
the
good
stuff
and
so
yeah.
So
good
luck!
A
How
we
planned
for
this
item?
Good
luck
in
how
we
talk
about
subsidies
and
that
we
have
to
really
consider
subsidy
planning
for
housing.
That's
not
going
to
use
large
developers
in
the
future.
I
think
we
have
to
really
focus
on
subsidies,
continuing
the
work
of
subsidies
that
are
really
meant
to
help
people
who
you
know
who
need
the
help.
A
You
know,
and
we
should
stick
to
its
initial
purposes,
of
what
subsidies
can
be
and
good
luck
on
those
efforts
in
in
this
next
upcoming
year
and
now
to
talk
about
the
upcoming
budget
issues
and
yeah.
Just
good
luck
with
openness,
and
I
think,
openness
and
having
the
public
meeting
process
continually
work
on
working
on
how
to
be
open.
Good
luck,
how
we
can
do
that.
Thank
you.
F
F
Okay,
so
this
so
so
so
this
doesn't
get
convoluted.
Okay,
these
these
agenda
items
are
stacked.
Ricardo,
predictably,
is
going
to
circumvent
democracy,
although
there's
no
time
there's
no
time
one
minute.
One
minute,
you
are
already
knowing
this
okay,
so
the
legit,
the
way
that
these
agendas
are
stacked,
and
why
did
she
say
this
is
stacked?
Yes,
yes,
chappie.
What.
F
Going
to
this
has
everything
to
do
with
it.
This
item
is
going
to
take
a
long
time.
This
item
is
going
to
take
a
long
time
to
discuss
hello.
Does
that
have
any
relevance?
Chappie?
No.
Now,
let's
see,
my
public
comment
has
to
go
by
your
jurisdiction.
So
is
this
okay
or
not
you're?
Okay,
you
don't
have
permission.
Can
I
have
permission?
You
know
I
want
my
two
minutes.
No,
I
want
my
two
when
it
started
over.
F
E
You
know
so
you
know
this,
and
so
we
gave
them
all
this
extra
money
to
discover
if
it
was
good,
you
know,
and
we
have
to
then.
What
is
the
problem
is
is
that
we
have
to
put
our
public
health
as
the
priority
and
not
about
business
as
usual,
like
businesses
and
jobs,
and
we
all
of
our
money
went
to
our
small
businesses
and
our
large
businesses,
our
airports,
expansion,
even
even
the
fact
that
we're
moving
the
homeless
out
of
you
know
columbus
park,
because
we
want
to
expand
our
airport.
E
You
know-
and
this
is
where
we
have
to
make
the
changing
our
priorities
towards
public
health
and
basic
needs,
because
really
what's
going
to
be
happening
as
we're,
seeing
more
and
more
with
what
happened
in
colorado,
a
thousand
homes
burned.
You
know:
that's
mostly
4
000
people
that
what
the
science
is
showing
is
that
less
and
have
less
habitable
earth,
we're
having
we're
seeing
it
with
our
own
eyes,
less
habitable
earth?
E
C
A
Hi
flair
here,
where's
going
first
today
thanks
a
lot
yeah,
so
public
record,
I
had
a
few
letters
of
mine
in
the
public
record
today
and
what
were
they
about?
One
was
about.
I
wanted
to
better
talk
about
the
issues
of
all
the
surveillance
technology.
That's
going
on
and
it's
being
asked
about
right
now,
good
luck
again
how
you
can
work
on
these
efforts.
It's
important
stuff!
A
The
accountability
I
think
is-
is
really
key
to
all
major
various
cities
right
now,
at
this
time,
if
you're,
open
and
accountable
with
your
practices
and
really
share
what
you're
doing,
I
think
we
can
really
make
decisions
towards
a
better
world
of
reimagine
and
health
and
human
services.
Out
of
that,
I
think
that
would
just
naturally
evolve
here
in
the
bay
area
if
we
really
commit
ourselves
to
it
at
this
time.
So
good
luck
on
those
efforts.
A
F
Yeah
paul
soto
from
the
horseshoe
I've
submitted
copious
amounts
four
emails
that
I
have
on
record
in
my
records
that
I've
submitted
to
tony
the
clerk
every
single
one
of
you,
because
you've
received
them
over
the
weekend
about
councilwoman
ottoman
data's
attempt
on
my
life.
Okay,
this
needs
to
be
a
part
of
the
public
record.
There
was
four
bullets
fired
at
me.
While
she
was
on
the
phone,
I
sent
text
messages
to
councilman
of
perales.
F
This
is
serious.
This
is
how
serious
this
is,
there's
a
little
boy
dead
because
of
councilman
paralysis.
Failure!
That's
how
I
put
in
the
public
record.
I
put
it
in
the
public
record
what
I'm
telling
you
is
that
I'm
sending
stuff
to
tony
and
all
of
you
cc'd
through
email
to
the
address
that
is
stated
on
the
record
and
they
are
not
getting
published.
F
F
I
have
ancestors
that
are
the
that
died
in
significant
numbers
in
proportion
to
the
population
in
the
vietnam
war,
we
were
only
five
percent
of
the
population
at
the
time,
yet
we
accounted
for
18
of
the
casualties
in
vietnam,
boston.
Anybody,
that's
why
we
had
the
chicano
moratorium
and
what
it
is
that
those
chicanos
died
for.
I
am
being
circulated
and
I
am
being
not
afforded
that.
E
Oh
well,
thank
you
for
explaining
that
that
really
helps
councilman
jones.
Thank
you
yeah.
Basically,
I
was
thinking
about
blair
and
the
letters
that
he
writes
and
he
always
talks
about
sustainability
and
vision,
zero
and
accountability
and
open
democracy,
and
also
you
know
about
surveillance
and
one.
One
of
the
issues
in
regards
to
that
is
how
we
really
jump
very
quickly
to
deal
with
our
corporations
and
businesses
in
terms
of
you
know,
robberies
and
things
like
that,
and
we
jump
to
get
surveillance
of
that.
E
That's
what
we
need
to
have
is
that
that
is
sustainability,
of
of
doing
that
and
to
slow
the
traffic
down
by
you
know
creating
a
very
little
lane
for
cars
and
all
of
it
for
safe,
safe
bicycling.
You
know,
so
we
really
make
that
a
priority,
and
it's
been
pretty
good.
You've
been
doing
pretty
good
with
those
balustrades
that
you
put
on
san
fernando
and
even
on
center.
You
know
you
made
it
good,
so
we
need
to.
K
Hey
paul,
it's
martha,
listen.
I
had
a
letter
that
I
wrote
after
the
cut-off
date
and
I
checked
the
public
record
to
make
sure
that
it
was
going
to
be.
You
know
the
following
week,
so
I'm
hanging
here
waiting
for
a
public
forum,
so
I
get
to
buy
to
the
apple.
I
can
address
my
my
letter
today
and
I
can
address
it
next
week
and
I
suggest
you
do
the
same
thing.
B
D
F
Now
chapter,
I
don't
want
your
interruptions,
man,
I'm
talking
about
the
consent
calendar!
That's
what
you
stated.
That's
what
I'm
talking
about!
So
don't
interrupt
me.
You
got
it
go
ahead.
The
consent
calendar
with
regard
to
what
blair
was
referencing.
There
are
land
issues.
There's
data
collection
issues
just
going.
Oh,
we
don't
need
a
vote.
We
don't
need
to
say
nothing
on
your
calendar
itself.
It
specifically
explicitly
states
that
any
member
of
the
public-
and
if
you
go,
ask
darcy
paul
mayor
darcy
paul.
F
I
participate
in
his
city
council
meetings
and
he
said:
is
there
any
member
of
the
public
that
would
like
an
item
pulled?
I
say
yes,
mayor
paul.
I
would
like
this
one
sure,
mr
soto,
what
would
you
like
to
speak
on
and
then
it's
up
to
the
committee
to
go
ahead
and
speak
on
if
they're
going
to
like?
If
this
is
an
item
that
requires
more
discussion
that
that
the
member
of
the
public
brought
out,
then
it's
discussed,
but
it
specifically
states
that
I'm
not
an
idiot
okay.
F
I
know
the
law,
if
you're
in
prison
for
over
30
years
believe
me
get
familiar
with
the
law.
Okay-
and
so
I
know
what
I'm
reading
and
it's
insulting
for
nora
to
go
on
here
and
put
on
the
record
that
there
is
somehow
another,
I'm
misinterpreting
that
there
is
no
misinterpretation,
it
is
explicitly
stated
any
member
of
the
public
can
pull
an
item.
F
Okay,
this
is
the
issue,
because
what
ricardo
or
whoever's
stacking
this
agenda
calendar
is
putting
items
on
there
that
should
be
discussed,
but
are
not.
That
is
the
circumvention
of
democracy.
Democrats,
the
power
of
the
people,
not
the
power
of
the
person
that
sets
the
agenda.
That's
the
power
of
the
mayor,
not
the
power
of
city
council,
member,
the
power
of
the
people.
Now,
if
you
need
to
feel
the
power
of
the
people
in
order
to
get
like
to
get
some
equilibrium
other
than
that
can
happen
too,.
A
Good
one
from
paul
paul
tesla,
and
I
we
always
have
been
talking
about
these
things.
I
have
a
few
comments
at
the
public
comments
on
what
he's
talking
about
about
the
pulling
of
an
item
at
the
same
time
for
this
item.
Thank
you
for
as
always
that
you
list
dumpster
day
items.
Hopefully
in
the
future.
Maybe
you
can
start
doing
it
like
ahead
of
before
the
dumpster
day.
A
Events
take
place
and
that
can
prepare
an
entire
community
who
wanted
like
our
neighborhood,
to
want
to
participate
in
a
dumpster
day
event,
because
they're,
really
cool
ideas.
I
think
to
really
bring
all
parts
of
the
community
together
and
it's
always
nice
when
they're
on
the
consent
calendar.
Sometimes
I
don't
speak
about
them
recently.
I
haven't
it
can
hopefully
help
the
process
out
and
about
the
small
business
task
force
man.
A
I
have
something
nice
to
say
about
that
that
we've
had
some
recent
meetings
that
involve
small
business
task
force
efforts,
and
it
is
just
done
slipped
my
mind
at
this
time,
and
but
good
luck
in
in
how
you
can
work
those
sort
of
questions
and
the
issues
they
are
addressing,
which
is
boy.
It
just
comes
right
in
me
and
then
goes
right
right
now.
So
thanks
thanks,
good
luck
and
a
serious
stuff
and
all
all
good
knowledge
is
helpful
knowledge
thanks
a
lot.
C
K
K
You
have
a
lot
more
stamina
than
I
do.
I
don't
attend
all
the
all
the
meetings
because
they
have
the
spirit
impact
on
the
disabled.
I
can't
sit
up
that
late,
but
I
will
be
doing
some
research
and
submitting
a
letter,
because
I
do
agree
that
I
believe
the
rights
of
the
public
are
being
violated
when
we
cannot
ask
for
an
item
to
be
pulled.
E
Thank
you,
tessa
woodman
c.
Yes,
that
is
an
important.
Thank
you,
martha
for
that
and
paul
to
talk
about
the
importance
of
our
being
able
to
address
the
content.
Calendar
and
another
thing
that
martha
and
I
have
talked
about-
is
the
importance
of
public
comment
being
in
the
beginning,
and
she
mentioned
that.
Why
that
it's
hard
to
stay
up
late,
and
and
do
that,
I
mean
it
makes
it
easier
with
our.
You
know,
zoom
abilities,
and
I
hope
we
never
lose
our
our
ability
to
have
it.
E
Democracy
has
been
improved
since
the
virtualization
of
our
of
our
council
meetings
and
board,
and
you
know
all
the
meetings
that
we
can
go
to.
So
we
need
to
keep
that
always
going
and,
and
the
real
reason
is,
is
because
of
the
the
externalities
of
getting
to
the
meeting
I
mean
today.
What
was
it
yesterday?
One
of
the
guys
had
to
one
of
our
congressmen
had
to
get
to
washington
and
he
was
on
that
highway
95
in
virginia
for
24
hours.
You
know
why
are
we
doing
that?
B
E
B
E
Know
it's
I'm
going
off
the
track,
so
I'll
say
I'll
go
back
on,
but
you
know
it's
it's
about.
You
know.
Democratic
participation
is
very
important,
and
so
you
know
and
then
the
climate
issues
of
the
externalities
when
we
have
to
get
to
meetings
so
anyway,
that
that
was
it
and
just
mostly
what
I
was
saying
is
something
else
is
important
is
having
the
public
comment
in
the
beginning
of
the
meeting
so
that
you
know
we
have
that
time.
It's
a
it's
a.
D
E
Well,
I
know
the
calendar
and
one
of
the
things
that
was
on
the
calendar
was
all
about.
You
know,
surveillance
and
not
surveilla,
you
know
all
the
technology,
and
so
like
I've
been
saying
that
we
need
to
keep
using
our
technology
to
improve
our
democracy
and
that's
what
our
virtual
meetings
are
about
and
keeping
that
going
and
and
that
and
just
so
you
know,
when
you
do
a
hybrid,
it
doesn't
work
as
well.
We
can't
see
who's
talking.
L
Happy
new
year,
everybody
thank
you
vice
mayor,
I'm
I'm
just
really
on
the
consent
calendar.
Those
are
all
taken
out
as
one
block.
If
I
know
right
when
we
try
to
leave
a
comment
on
the
ecommerce,
is
there
a
way
to
break
it
up
or
what
it
makes
it
easier?
Because
I
know
you
you,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
the
council
get
inundated
with
a
lot
of
material,
and
you
know,
what's
important
to
us,
may
not
be
important
to
the
other
million
people
that
folks
are
working
with.
L
So
how
would
you
like
it
if
we
want
to
address
something
like
in
bullet
points,
to
make
it
a
little
more
accessible,
but
on
the
consent,
calendar?
Does
each
item
on
the
consent?
Calendar
have
an
e
comment,
because
the
one
I
tried
doing
it.
It
just
had
consent,
calendar
e
comment
and
now
primarily
for
council.
So
if
anybody
could
answer
that
question,
thank
you.
D
C
And
I'm
going
to
make
a
change
to
the
agenda
because
katherine
wieland
is
here
and
we
don't
want
to
keep
her
waiting
too
long.
So
I'm
going
to
go
to
the
open
government,
public
records
appeal
item
and
I'm
going
to
go
first
to
lee.
I'm
sorry.
I
keep
saying
the
angel
newly
to
provide
some
additional
context
and
path
forward.
F
100
paul
sultan
from
abortion,
100
percent
object
to
that
100.
There
is
a
very
viable
reason
that
this
must
be
public.
We
have
followed
this
for
three
weeks.
I've
been
on
every
single
session
and
when
she
initially
did
not
show
up
in
the
way
that
tony
stuck
her
nose
in
and
starts
giving
comments,
she
gave
a
public
comment
on
something
that
was
happening
in
the
public
sphere.
She's
a
facilitator,
that's
all
she
is
and
she
wants
to
butt
her
nose
in
it.
F
That
was
at
the
first
meeting,
and
I
have
followed
this
all
the
way
through.
I
demand
I'm
not
asking
you.
I
demand
that
be
heard
in
open,
as
it
has
been
for
the
longest.
We
need
to
know
everything
that's
happening
with
this
police
department
and
when
it
comes
to
open
forum
you're
going
to
know.
Why?
So
is
this
that
adam
that
item?
Because
I
wanted
to
speak
on
that
because
I
had
officers
at
my
house
on
the
weekend
and
the
officer
went
for
her
gun
and
she
was
going
to
fire
six
police
officers
yeah.
F
F
I
was
unarmed,
so
that
means
that
the
police
department
downtown,
has
prejudices
and
preconceived
notions
about
certain
people
in
the
public.
So
is
this
that
item
chappie
or
if
I
speak
about
this
in
open
forum,
because
I
was
waiting
for
this
item,
so
it
says:
what
are
you
guys
doing?
Man,
you
guys
are
circumventing
democracy,
the
police
department
and
these
look-
the
police
department
is
guilty.
They
don't
want
to
produce
that
tape
and
they
want
to
make
a
deal
with
her
outside
of
the
public
sphere.
No,
you
don't
have
my
permission
to
do
that.
B
A
Where,
wherever
the
thing
didn't,
let
me
unmute
it
wouldn't
give
me
the
mute
option,
but
it
has
now
so
hi.
Thanks
for
the
words
of
paul,
I
am
not
going
to
speak
as
adamantly
as
paul,
but
man.
This
has
been
an
incredible
learning
process.
I
think
for
all
of
us-
and
I
think
that's
first
and
foremost,
I
think
we
all
can
agree.
You
know
how
we
handle
domestic
violence
issues
a
few
years
ago
to
how
we're
starting
to
learn
to
handle
them
better.
A
Now
it
would
be
nice
if
this
could
continue
to
be
an
open
public
process
and
if
you
do
have
to
go
through
to
a
closed
meeting
process
that
some
part
of
it
can
have
a
you
know,
an
open
public
meeting
process
to
it.
It
would
be
really
helpful.
The
person
the
woman
who's
going
through
this
has
been
incredibly
brave
and
smart,
and
I
don't
know
just
reserved
and
simple
and
she's
doing
a
really
amazing
thing
right
now
and
it's
really
helpful
to
all
of
us.
It's
been
a
good.
A
I
hope
a
really
important
good
learning
experience
for
all
of
us
and
to
make
it
open
in
public
for
our
future.
It
is
important
and
good
luck
in
the
efforts
with
this
item
that
she
really
receives
the
justice
she
deserves,
and
I
think
she
should
be
allowed
to
view
the
tapes
within
possibly
the
purview
of
her
lawyer
and
and
probably
on
some
police
officers
that
way
it
can
maintain
its
privacy
and
it
doesn't
have
to
be
considered
open
public
data.
It's
like
lawyer,
confidentiality,
something
like
that.
A
You
know
using
those
sort
of
standards.
I
think
that
should
be
that
could
set
a
new
standard
of
precedence.
I
think
that
we
should
really
be
considering
that
this
woman
really
deserves
so
good
luck.
How
you
can
work
on
this
and
thanks
for
your
time,
public
body,
camera
footage
should
be
accessible
in
ways.
Good
luck,
how
we
can
work
on
it.
Thank
you.
C
M
Hi,
thank
you
very
much.
I
just
wanted
to
quickly
weigh
in
to
say
we
believe
that
the
our
client
is
entitled
to
the
footage
of
the
video
if
the
police,
if
the
independent
police
auditor
all
determined
that
you
know
it
didn't
violate,
you
know
whatever
standard
they
set.
I
don't
know
what
the
hesitation
is
with
releasing
the
video
footage
to
her.
M
We
have
reached
out
to
the
chief
and
to
the
head
of
the
family
violence
center
to
say
she
would
like
to
just
view
the
video
with
the
leadership
to
talk
about
how
that
video
and
the
actions
in
the
video
have
affected
her.
As
someone
who's
been
impacted
by
domestic
violence,
we
think
if
the
police
are
interested
in
improving
relationships
with
the
community
improving
services
to
domestic
violence,
that
would
be
a
huge
step
forward,
we're
hoping
that
that
will
come
up
to
date,
because
this
is
really
what
captain
has
been
asking
for.
She
wants
justice.
M
She
wants
recognition
that
what
happened
to
her
is
something
that
the
department
will
say.
We
need
to
do
some
training.
We
need
to
change
how
we
do
things
so
we're
hoping
that
that's
the
outcome
and
then
beyond
that,
we
want
to
be
ready
to
work
with
the
police
department,
with
the
city
leadership
staff,
to
really
look
at
a
different
way,
because
survivors
of
domestic
violence
are
at
high
risk.
How
this
person
was
alerted
to
this
item
being
heard
lacks
so
much
information.
M
It
compromised
her
safety
and
the
city
clerk
really
needs
to
be
held
accountable
for
how
they
inform
the
public
when
they
are.
You
know
in
proceedings
where
their
information
is
going
to
be
very
public.
That
did
not
happen.
That
needs
a
lot
of
scrutiny
to
see
what
is
the
process
of
the
city
clerk
and
for
them
to
fully
inform
the
public
of
the
implications
of
what
people
are
requesting.
But
I
appreciate
the
committee's
full
attention
to
this
and
we're
hoping
for
the
outcome
that
we're
looking
for.
Thank
you.
N
I
want
to
quickly
say
that
her
courage
has
led
me
to
do
even
more
research,
and
I
just
hope
that
each
person
will
consider
watching
the
special
john
stewart
had
a
special
on
apple
tv
on
guns,
and
these
two
women
who
were
victims
of
domestic
violence
really
opened
my
eyes
to
who
it
is
and
what
it
looks
like,
and
there
really
is
a
lot
of
victim
blaming
that
goes
on.
It
starts
immediately,
it's
an
unseen
and
and
absolutely
unheard
epidemic.
N
That's
happening,
there's,
shame
and
silence,
and
all
of
this
surrounding
it,
and
we
have
to
find
our
way
through
taking
care
of
domestic
violence,
violence,
victims
and
I'd
like
to
also
just
say
that
I
learned
through
that
important
video
that
41
41.
I
don't
know
if
it's
in
san
jose,
but
this
would
be
in
the
united
states,
but
41
of
all
fatal
calls
for
police
are
when
they
respond
to
a
domestic
violence
dispute.
N
So
we
all
need
to
learn
here.
Domestic
violence
victims
their
abusers,
the
police.
We
all
have
to
learn
that
this
epidemic
is
just
hurting,
so
many,
including
our
police
department,
they
benefit
if
they
learn
and
grow
and
train
from
any
types
of
ways
that
we
can
honor
these
victims.
So
that's
all
I
have
to
say,
and
I
and
I
do
think
that
if
you
do
get
a
chance
to
see
that
special,
it
will
really
open
your
eyes
to
how
how
it's
hurting
police
and
these
victims,
it's
hurting
everyone.
C
E
You,
oh
good
well,
thank
you.
It
would
be
helpful
if
it
was
a
little
more
clear
public
record
appeal,
but
basically
you
know
that
not
everybody
has
the
time
to
look
at
everything
on
the
agenda,
but
thank
you
for
everybody
else.
Who's
spoken
about
this,
and
am
I
thinking
about
you
know
that
really,
when
we
talk
about
defunding
the
police,
why
we
talk
about?
That
is
because
we
want
a
different
type
of
system.
Like
you
know,
like
people
have
been
saying
in
the
schools,
we
want
caring,
not
policing
and
and
stuff
like
that.
E
So
it's
the
same
issue
and
it's
the
same
issue
when
we
come
across
it
with
homeless
people
and
and
how
the
police
don't
do
anything
and-
and
then
we
have
this,
we
have
a
a
type
of
group.
There's
like
a
nine
to
five
group.
That
does
you
know
that's
more
about
social
services
or
or
you
know
so,
social
workers
or
people
who
are
better
at
handling
emotional
things
and
and
de-escalating,
and
that
when
we
have
the
guns,
as
the
you
know,
part
of
the
police
that's
their
tool
and
there.
E
You
know
proactively
versus
you
know
the
police
say
that
they
can't
do
anything.
So
we
do.
We
just
need
a
different
system,
and
you
know
in
terms
of
how
we
resolve
so
many
of
these
social
issues
that
we're
facing
domestic
violence
and
homelessness
and
and
things
like
that,
that
we
really
need
to
be
more
proactive
about
it
and
to
make
you
know,
you
know
just
have
these
people
required
to
be
part
of
some
type
of
analysis
or
some
type
of
therapy.
You
know.
B
L
L
If
there
was
a
way
to
hybrid
this,
and
I'm
sure
that
some
of
the
other
wonderful
speakers
mentioned
that
in
in
a
was
an
administrative
law,
judge
or
people
that
both
lawyer
groups
agree
with,
could
sit
down
with
the
lady
and
sit
down.
She
could
she's
offering
this
educational
thing
that
could
it
for
free,
basically,
where
the
city
might
wind
up
paying
a
million
bucks
for
a
consultant
to
come
in
and
actually
where
the
rubber
meets
the
road
finding
a
way
to
protect
everybody's
rights
involved,
but
protecting
the
people
who
are
most
at
risk.
L
In
my
own
experience
in
my
own
life,
I've
known
for
seven
people
who
have
died
in
domestic
violence
situations
and
a
dozen
more
that
were
involved
in
didn't
get
killed,
but
pretty
darn
close
and
all
was
because
there
was
a
lack
of
communication
with
authorities,
and
I
know
authorities
are
under
a
lot
of
pressure
because
they're
scrutinized
and
they
should
be
but
they're
human.
You
know
what
I'm
trying
to
say
anyways.
Thank
you
vice
mayor,
thank.
O
O
Solutions
to
domestic
violence,
she's
asked
me
to
speak
on
her
behalf
because
of
what
a
huge
toll
this
has
taken
on
her
from
not
being
told
this
meeting
was
even
happening
and
almost
having
her
case,
dismissed
to
then
being
thrust
into
a
public
and
recorded
meeting
without
any
awareness
that
it
would
be
public
or
recorded
to
having
inaccurate
information
given
about
her
case
repeatedly,
especially
in
a
public
setting
to
then
constantly
having
the
goal
post
changed
on.
Why
we're
denying
her
the
footage?
O
That
is
absolutely
her
right
as
a
victim
of
a
crime
to
have
the
footage
of
the
police
mishandling
of
her
case
she.
This
has
been
a
lot
for
her
to
have
to
continuously
be
present
at
these
meetings,
while
accommodating
care
for
her
newborn
and
three
other
children.
So
I'm
here
to
speak
on
her
behalf,
we'd
like
to
know
what
is
meant
by
this
closed
session.
O
P
Thank
you.
I
was
trying
to
mute
the
if,
if
council
chooses
to
go
to
closed
session,
it's
opportunity
to
discuss
the
legal
issues
involved
in
this
matter
and
for
council
to
consider
those
legal
issues,
and
one
of
the
steps
in
the
public
records
appeal,
obviously,
is
for
someone
seeking
a
public
record
to
go
to
court.
P
In
this
hearing,
we're
trying
to
strike
a
balance
and
and
provide
some
information
and
background
and
in
legal
issues
to
the
council,
so
that
it
it
will
allow
a
more
informed
discussion
here.
There
is
there.
This
doesn't
mean
that
there
won't
be
a
further
hearing
before
this
committee
on
this
issue,
but
it
it's
a
way
to
provide
information
and
background
to
the
council
in
a
way
that
is
hopefully
less
invasive
than
than
this
process.
I
And
vice
mayor,
so
that's
that's
the
legal
rationale.
I
I
would
also
like
to
say
that
we
have
also
we
also
are
hearing
loud
and
clear,
some
of
the
concerns
by
many
of
the
advocates
around
the
domestic
violence
issues
that
we
believe
are
very
valid.
No
san,
jose
pd
and
I
know
deputy
chief
washburn
and
stephen
donahue
are
here
on
the
call,
as
well
so
on
on
a
separate
track
very
related
to
this.
I
We're
also
taking
a
look
at
our
internal
protocols
concerning
this
and
given
that
giving
those
the
attention
that
it
really
merits,
and
so
I
also
wanted
to
wanted
to
mention
that
as
well.
So
you
know
there's
kind
of
a
legal
rationale,
but
then
we
also
are
hearing
loud
and
clear.
The
need
to
really
take
a
look
at.
O
O
I
hope
we
can
take
this
as
a
learning
experience
that
for
domestic
violence,
survivors
coming
for
public
records
appeal
or
any
similar
requests
it'd
be
offered
to
have
a
private
closed
session
before
it
gets
to
this
point
because
catherine
was
not
given
that
option
we're
presenting
the
option
now.
What
is
this?
The
third
time
that
we've
all
met
and
a
lot
of
her
private
details
have
been
shared,
so
that
would
be
my
hope
going
forward
as
a
policy
change.
I
G
But
what
I
understood
from
my
last
conversation-
and
this
has
been
really
dragged
out-
and
I
understand
I-
can
hear
the
frustration
I'm
just
as
frustrated
amanda.
I
I
apologize
and
and
esther
and
everybody
else
who
I
know
is
a
supporter
of
including
our
police
department,
because
this
is
a
bureaucracy.
G
And
so
loud
and
clear,
I
think
everybody
involved
is-
is
absolutely
learning
from
this.
I
think
there
is
a
policy
recommendation
that
could
come
out
of
this,
so
that
we
can
improve
our
processes,
but
outside
of
that,
I
thought
so
that's
one
thing
process
is
one
thing
we
we
can
continue
to
work
on
that.
The
the
other
question
I
have
is
last
conversation
we
had.
G
I
thought
I
thought
we
had
recognized
that
there
was
that
there
was
a
crime
and
that
the
the
video
could
be
viewed
if
there
was
a
victim
of
a
crime,
and
so
is
the
question
or
concern
here
that
this
might
be
in
this.
This
video
might
be
included
in
the
court
process
or
is
the
concern
also
just
in
having
the
victim
of
a
crime
view.
The
video.
Q
Yes,
thank
you
very
much
for
the
question.
Councilmember
arenas.
So
it's
twofold
right
without
obviously
getting
into
the
the
facts
specifically
of
this
case.
To
answer
your
question
number
one.
There
first
needs
to
be
a
valid
restraining
order
and
then
we
need
to
determine
the
elements
of
the
crime,
whereas
we
can
prove
that
there's
a
violation
of
the
said
order.
So
in
my
last
report,
just
to
recap,
I
did
verify
that
there
was
in
fact
a
valid
served
restraining
order.
Q
The
question
that
still
stood
that
needed
to
be
looked
at
more
closely
was
whether
or
not
there
was
a
violation
of
that
order.
So
again
that's
a
two-prong
test,
whereas
we
successfully
identified
the
first
prong
and
with
hindsight,
and
then
we
work
to
address
the
second
half
of
that
question
whether
or
not
there
was
a
violation
of
a
valid
order.
Hopefully
that
answers
your
question.
Q
It's
a
legal
standard,
whereas
we
conduct
an
investigation,
we
consult
the
santa
clara
county
district
attorney's
office
and
the
district
attorney's
office
in
a
hypothetical
case
would
file.
You
know
criminal
charges
based
on
our
investigation,
slash
evidence
and
findings,
so
it
would
be
a
collaborative
investigative
effort
between
the
police
department,
ourselves
and
the
district
attorney's
office.
So
it's
a
legal
standard.
If
you
will
in
layman's
terms
that
needs
to
be
met
to
determine
whether
or
not
there
would
be
criminal
charges
that
could
be
filed
against
a
person.
G
Q
You're
absolutely
right:
there
are
times
where
the
whether
or
not
the
district
attorney
would
file
charges
is
separate
and
independent
from
a
determination
right
as
to
the
law
enforcement
having
probable
cause
to
believe
that
a
crime
occurred.
Those
are
two
separate
standards.
What
the
question
is
whether
or
not
we
have
evidence
to
determine
whether
or
not
a
crime
in
fact
has
occurred.
Q
Q
I
know
the
deputy
city
manager
mentioned
to
a
two-track
approach
right
there
there's
the
legal
discussion
right
that,
maybe
we
you
end
up
deciding
whether
or
not
this
is
take
taken
to
closed
session
and
then
there's
really
operationally
how
we
look
at
this
right
and
what
we
could
do
going
forward.
I
would
like
to
acknowledge
the
fact
that
anytime,
there's
a
lack
of
clarity
or
a
lack
of
due
process
or
a
perceived
lack
of
due
process
right,
regardless
of
the
reason
in
any
investigation-
and
you
know,
is
unacceptable.
Q
Q
The
fact
that
we
have
to
work
in
concert
with
the
law
and
evidence
and
facts
of
a
case
and
those
feel
like
two
separate
things,
because
on
the
one
hand
you
have
a
human
element
and
on
the
other
hand,
you
have
the
legal
standards
with
which
we
work,
and
sometimes
there
is
there's
a
disparity
there.
So
I
just
wanted
to
have
an
opportunity,
regardless
of
the
outcome
of
your
vote
and
motion,
that
that
we
acknowledge
that
here
today,
in
a
public
forum.
G
I
guess
I'm
still
having
a
difficult
time
trying
to
wrap
my
head
around
this
determination
of
a
crime,
because
I
would
assume
that
when
a
police
officer
responds
to
a
call
based
on
what
their
observation
is-
and
maybe
some
follow-up,
that
they
determine
that
the
crime
has
been
committed
and
they
write
it
up
in
a
report.
And
actually
you
know
we
mentioned
last
time
that
we
were
here
that
we,
because
of
this
actual
this
case,
we
we
changed
some
duty
manual
changes.
G
But
I
would
imagine
that
that
determination
is
is
rather
quick
and
swift
on
that
police
officer's
end
of
of
whether
viewing
this
as
a
crime
or
not,
and
now
that
we
have
the
information
that
I
thought
was
missing,
which
was
the
a
valid
restraining
order.
We
found
that
there
is
a
valid
restraining
order.
I
would
imagine,
then,
that
the
next
step
would
be
since
there
was
a
valid
restraining
order
and
the
purchase
of
those
guns
were
made
that
that
could
qualify
as
a
crime.
And
so
I'm
I'm
still.
Q
Q
If
you
will
right-
and
I
think
that
should
this
go
to
closed
session,
that
would
be
those
specific
facts
of
the
case
that
we
would
look
at
because
I
think,
there's
a
distinction
between
the
facts
of
the
case
and
what
we've
been
able
to
collect
and
look
at
versus.
What
we
think
you
know
should
be
a
crime.
We
have
to
look
at
actual
evidence,
and
so
you
know,
like
I
said
having
if
it
goes
to
closed
session.
Those
would
be
some
of
the
details
that
we
would
do
a
little
deeper
dive
into.
G
Got
it
well.
Thank
you.
I
know
that
for
for
me,
as
where
I
sit
is,
and
the
way
that
we
address
issues
is
to
change
policies
when
policies
aren't
working
for
us,
and
certainly
I
think
all
of
us
collectively
agree
that
there's
some
imp
areas
of
improvement
for
for
this
process,
as
it
relates
to
some
some
of
our
more
sensitive
populations
that
require
a
higher
level
of
discretion.
G
So
I
I
I'll
be
making
sure
to
I'll
make
sure
that
we
move
in
that
direction
as
and
that's
my
commitment
to
to
all
the
stakeholders
here
that
will
make
sure
to
address
this.
I
already
heard
that
commitment
from
angel
and
from
our
administration
so
I'll.
You
know
I'll
I'll
leave
for
for
an
open
discussion
for
the
rest
of
my
colleagues
to
jump
in
and
figure
this
piece
out.
I'm
not
sure
I
feel
like
we
start
from
from
point
a
every
time
we
have
this
discussion.
It
is
very
complex.
G
I'm
sure
that
all
these
months
have
led
up
to
a
level
of
frustration
for
those
involved
that
I
can't
even
fathom,
and
so
once
again
I
just
apologize
for
that.
But
I
know
out
of
this
will
come
an
improved
process
for
those
who
follow
and
who,
unfortunately,
will
need
to
use
this
appeal
process.
So
thank
you.
P
O
There
just
needs
to
have
been
a
incident,
and
there
was
an
incident.
There
was
a
crime,
and
we
know
the
vast
majority
of
crimes
will
not
be
charged,
which
is
why
this
feels
to
me,
like
an
excuse,
not
to
give
her
the
footage.
It's
not
the
reason
that
was
given
to
her.
It's
a
completely
new
reason.
It's
not
the
reason
that
was
given
in
previous
sessions,
which
was
that
she
didn't
have
a
tiara,
which
she
did
it
again.
O
J
Yeah,
thank
you.
You
know,
there's
a
topic,
an
issue
that
I've
kind
of
always
have
felt
that
belongs
at
least
at
first
on
closed
session
and
not
an
open
session
because
of
the
potential
exposure
of
of
the
victim.
In
this
case
you
know
the
of
the
survivor
of
this
incident.
I
mean,
I
don't
think
it's.
J
It's
been
fair,
necessarily
to
have
a
lot
of
this
aired
publicly
and
there's
a
lot
of
questions.
I
think
that
we
can
ask
and
get
more
clear
answers
in
closed
session
about
what
specifically
she's
asking
for
and
what
specifically
the
concerns
of
city
are
from
a
legal
standpoint
that
we
can't
do
publicly,
and
that
would
help
us
at
least
have
that
conversation
and
then
determine
whether
we
need
to
come
back
out
and
continue
and
make
a
decision
an
open
session
or
not,
depending
on
how
that
conversation
goes
in
closed
session.
J
But
I
think
there's
an
opportunity
here
to
potentially
dive
deeper,
and
maybe
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
if
there's
a
question
here
for
nora
or
deputy
chief
washburn
about
what
we
can
divulge,
maybe
in
terms
of
what
we
can
learn
about.
Some
of
the
more
specific
details
in
this
case
in
closed
session
that
we
can't
do
an
open
session
that
maybe
would
help
guide
us.
P
I
B
Unfortunately,
there's
a
lot
of
information
that
we're
not
able
to
divulge
in
an
open
forum,
because
it's
just
not
appropriate
if
we
do
have
counsel
in
a
closed
session,
we'd
be
happy
to
discuss
some
of
those
things
with
ms
weyland's
permission,
but
unfortunately,
in
an
open
forum,
it's
just
not
acceptable
for
us
to
talk
about
the
details
of
her
case
in
a
matter
that
will
provide
you.
The
information
that
you're
requesting.
J
Yeah
that
that's
kind
of
what
I
suspected
and
my
my
feeling
has
been
that
we've
be.
We
continually
get
asked
to
make
a
decision
about
this
without
being
privy
to
the
information
that
others
have
and,
and
that
makes
it
really
uncomfortable,
difficult
and
being
having
access
to
that
information
would
be
helpful.
I
mean
I
I
had
question
the
beginning
as
to
why
this
was
public.
J
When
I
was
on
a
school
board,
those
always
came
to
closed
session
discussion,
because
we
wouldn't
want
to
discuss
any
particulars
of
an
individual,
constituent
or
resident
publicly,
and
so
I
mean
it,
that's
there
to
be
protective
of
that
constituent
or
that
resident,
and
so
I've
been
surprised
by
how
this
process
has
played
out
and
I'd
be
way
more
comfortable,
at
least
having
the
next
conversation
in
closed
session.
So
we
can
maybe
have
a
more
open
conversation
without
feeling
like
we're
putting
people
at
risk.
B
If
I
may,
council
member,
I
think
one
thing-
we
definitely
want
to
take
into
consideration
and
maybe
amanda
you
can
help
us
with
this.
Is
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
the
private
details
of
someone
else's
allegations
and-
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
she's,
okay
with
us
talking
about
that
in
closed
session,
where
she's
not
party
to
it
and
before
we
do
move
into
any
kind
of
closed
session.
We
consider
that.
J
Well,
I
I
appreciate
that
that
certainly
is
appropriate.
I
would
also
ask
the
question
again
from
my
past
experience.
I
know
that
there
are
you
can
invite
people
into
closed
session
to
discuss
their
circumstances,
parts
of
it
at
least
parts
that
are
available,
that
they're,
that
are,
that
they
have
knowledge
about
and
that
they
can
provide
input
and
at
least
be
there
to
hear
what
at
least
in
some
situation,
what
some
parts
of
it
are
being
are
being
said
and
make
their
case.
O
Yeah,
I
would
want
to
know
if
it's
going
to
move
to
a
closed
session.
Would
catherine
reichenbach-
and
I
just
want
to
clarify
her
last
name-
is
rykenbach.
Not
we
learned,
I
know,
there's
been
a
misnaming,
but
would
she
be
able
to
have
support
people
in
on
her
meeting
with
her?
She
would
definitely
like
next
door
solutions
there
to
advocate
on
her
behalf,
but
I
will
just
want
to
make
sure
that
this
is
not
going
to
take
away
the
public
support
from
this
meeting
format
and
replace
it
with
no
support
for
catherine.
P
H
P
A
D
C
B
J
F
Yes,
paul
sultan
from
the
horseshoe.
First
of
all,
it
is
a
complete
unethical
conflict
of
interest
for
you
to
vote
on
this
for
perales
to
vote
on
it.
For
carrasco
to
be
on
that
committee,
ricardo
and
jimenez.
That's
first
of
all,
okay,
I
don't
trying
to
sell
the
public
that
you
were
moralizing
about
this
issue.
Oh
we
planned
it
years
and
years
ago,
but
but
since
now
that
there's
children
involved,
we
can't
we
can't.
We
couldn't
possibly
do
this.
Now
that
is
such
a
croc
you're,
a
liar
chappie.
F
You
are
a
liar
you're,
a
fraud,
paralysis
of
fraud.
These
are
crimes.
Do
you
know
right
now
that
the
grand
jury,
the
grand
jury,
is
being
very
polite
and
not
just
calling
you
guys
out
and
telling
you
that
it's
a
crime
for
you
guys
to
vote
on
this
at
vta
and
then
vote
on
that
here
and
you're
switching
money,
millions
and
millions
of
dollars
at
this
particular
meeting
was
when
roland
went
on
there.
He
lost
his
cool
and
he
said
what
he
said
it
was
at
this
meeting.
F
Do
you
know
that
I've
spent
30
years
around
sociopaths
in
a
sociopath?
I
define
as
a
human
being,
that
does
not
have
an
emotional,
compassionate
response
to
criminal
activity
on
ethical
activity
or
immoral
activity.
Those
three,
I
would
say
you,
ricardo,
perales
carrasco
and
jimenez
all
qualified,
because
you
don't
have
no.
In
fact,
you'll
just
keep,
smiling
chappie
and
so
will
perales
straight
face,
because
I
seen
all
the
videos
of
scott
nice
at
that
year
in
the
2021
meeting.
Look
at
that
bunch
of
social.
A
Hi,
thank
you.
Thank
you
queen
here
I'll
try
to
be
quick.
Just
thank
you
for
the
sensitivity
you
offered
to
human
lives
on
the
last
item
and
thank
you
for
the
sensitivity
you're
offering
to
city
projects
and
and
to
people's
ideas
and
ways
of
thinking
for
this
item.
It's
been
a
long
time
in
the
making
that
people
have
been
fighting
this
project
and
wanting
a
better
green
sustainability
feature
for
this
project.
A
N
Thank
you
yeah.
I
mean
overall
reading
everything
and
hearing
about
everything.
It
sounds
like
a
wonderful
idea.
Right,
no
forget
the
off-ramp,
you
know
have
a
lovely
area
for
the
children
that's
developed,
but
I
think
this
is
a
really
important
item
to
start
discussing
how
sometimes
these
long-term
plans
with
millions
and
millions
of
dollar
dollars
that
are
being
spent
end
up.
N
We
don't
even
know
if
that
those
other
projects
need
that
money.
It's
super
irresponsible.
To
think
that
we
take
taxpayer
money,
cancel
one
project,
put
the
money
somewhere
else
and
just
expect
someone
like
me
to
be
like:
oh,
they
know
what
they're
doing
with
that
money.
That's
ridiculous!
So
please
consider
splitting
those
two
items:
canceling
the
off
ramp,
but
taking
that
money
and
having
somewhere
that
we
discuss
what
we
could
do
with
it.
E
B
B
P
I'm
wayan
trung
with
mother's
excellence
for
a
livable
climate.
I
thank
mayor
the
cardo
vice
mayor
jones,
council,
members,
cohen,
keralas
and
foley
for
your
support
of
ending
charcot
as
a
climate
activist.
It
is
heartening
to
to
see
this
council
is
not
only
setting
ambitious
clinicals,
but
it's
actually
taking
the
necessary
decisions
to
implement
them,
even
if
they
seem
a
little
difficult
at
first.
P
Indeed,
it
makes
no
environmental
or
fiscal
sense
to
be
investing
in
expanding
highways,
which
will
only
increase
our
vmp
for
decades,
especially
since
we
may
reach
our
climate's
irreversible,
tipping
point
in
six
in
five
years,
not
10
or
15
or
25..
In
2019,
the
city
council
declared
a
climate
emergency.
Please
keep
your
word
to
our
young
people,
whose
future
is
at
stake.
P
J
Yeah,
thank
you
and
I
I'm
sorry
that
we
couldn't
hear
from
my
friend
monico's
pta
leader
in
at
orchard
school,
but
I
think
I
know
where
she
would
come
down
on
this
specific
issue.
I
don't
I
don't
want
to
spend
much
time.
I
think
we've
talked
you
know
over
the
year
everyone's
been
exposed
to
this
issue
and
knows
about
the
controversial
decision
that
was
made
in
2020
to
build
this
overpass
and
unfortunately
it
doesn't
work
anymore.
J
Fortunately,
for
us,
the
next
two,
the
top
two
projects
in
terms
of
ranking
on
vta's
list
of
of
project
improvements
are
also
in
north
san
jose.
Those
are
the
101
mayberry
berryessa
interchange
and
the
zanker
101
interchange
over
by
the
airport.
Those
are
really
important
projects,
in
fact,
we're
going
to
do
first,
scoping
meeting
with
caltrans
and
vta
and
the
city
on
the
101
mayberry
berryessa
interchange
in
just
two
weeks
on
the
19th
of
january.
To
begin
that
process.
J
J
Wholeheartedly
support
both
items
on
this
agenda.
I
look
forward
to
having
this
final
vote
come
before
council,
so
I'll
make
a
motion
to
adopt
my
memo.
Leave
it
up
to
staff
about
exactly
which
week
the
this
should
come
back
to
council
in
terms
of
the
schedule,
although
I
don't
know
that
it
will
be
a
long
discussion
at
the
council
meeting,
but
I
think
that
we
ought
to
just
figure
out
when
they
should
fit,
invest
in
the
next
month
or
so
on,
council
to
make
take
final
action.
A
J
C
M
R
Well,
happy
new
year,
everybody,
I'm
back,
you
guys
are
back.
This
is
awesome.
2022.
can't
wait,
can't
wait
to
see
what
you
guys
have
in
store
for
us
also
happy
trace
los
reyes
for
my
latino
and
latino
brothers
and
sisters
out
there.
I
know
the
city
doesn't
like
to
have
to
celebrate
religious
holidays,
but
happy
trace
los
reyes
out
there
january
6th
is
going
to
be
tomorrow
anyway.
I
digress
sam
going
to
washington
dc
he's
got.
Is
he
going
to
expose
himself
to
cope?
I
hope
he's
triple
math
on
the
plane.
I
vote.
R
R
Right
I
mean
is:
let's
go
brandon
going
to
know
sam's
even
there
for
what
who's
he
gonna
talk
to
you
mayor,
p,
mayor
pete's,
gonna
gonna,
give
some
more,
I
vote.
No,
no
city
worker
should
be
able
to
go
anywhere
because
of
this
cobit
thing.
We
gotta
hear
time
and
time
again
from
everybody.
Oh,
don't
travel,
don't
do
this
wear
your
mask.
Go,
get
a
booster
shot.
You
know
what
you
could
be.
R
He
could
be
spreading
the
sniffles
across
the
america
if
he
gets
on
on
an
airplane,
to
go
to
washington
dc
to
stay
in
some
crappy
hotel
there.
So
no,
I
don't
think
sam
should
be
able
to
go
there.
None
of
you
guys
should
be
able
to
go
anywhere.
You
should
be
just
like
everybody
else,
but
I
forgot
the
city
of
san
jose
and
all
its
workers
and
the
politicians
you
guys
are
above
everybody
right.
Everyone
else
is
beneath
you.
So
hey
happy,
traceros
ray
happy
new
year.
F
And
I've
been
wondering
when
my
co-pilot
was
gonna
weigh
in
man
good
to
see
you
back,
homie
call
something
from
the
horseshoe
now.
This
is
what
I'd
like.
No,
no,
no,
in
fact
I
demanded
of
mayor
ricardo.
I
would
like
the
agenda
that
is
going
to
be
at
this
particular
meeting.
I
want
that
agenda
publicly
publicly
placed.
I
would
also
like
and
not
a
synopsis.
F
F
What
lecardo's
interpretation
in
response
was
to
every
single
one
of
those
agenda
items
on
that
agenda
that
they
are
going
to
be
held
to
in
washington.
Look
at
how
important
this
meeting
is.
It
is
extremely
important
and
the
public
has
an
interest
in
knowing
precisely
what
our
mayor,
because
he
represents
me.
He
goes
there
he's
the
mayor
of
san
jose,
not
silicon
valley.
That's
another
thing,
I'm
sick
and
tired
of
now
either
you
guys
want
to
run.
You
know
corrales,
you
want
to
run
from
there
run
for
mayor
assange.
F
Boy
represent,
don't
be
talking
to
silicon
valley,
this
silicon
valley
that
it
doesn't
exist,
homeboy,
look
on
any
map.
There
is
no
silicon
valley
so
to
hear
out
of
the
mouth
of
my
mayor.
That
goes
all
across
the
world
and
he's
talking
about
yeah
well
here
in
silicon
valley.
Here
in
silicon
valley,
hey
homeboy,
you
want
to
run
for
the
mayor
of
silicon
valley.
Be
my
guest.
Hey
promise
be
my
guest
homeboy.
F
C
A
Hi,
thank
you.
The
mayor
is
going
to
washington
dc
wow.
Thank
you
for
your
for
allowing
public
comment
on
this
item.
I
wanted
to
offer.
I
think
it
was
a
few
years
ago
back
in
2017.
I
think
it
was
the
mayor's
conference
that
mayor
carter
went
back
to
washington
dc.
He
came
back
when,
after
the
former
president
trump
was
first
elected
and
the
broadband
deal
things
that
he
worked
on.
He
he
cancelled
his
work
that
he
was
doing
at
the
federal
level.
The
mayor
did.
A
He
wasn't
liking,
what
the
direction
that
federal
agencies
wanted
to
go
in
at
that
time,
and
I
s
it
was
a
very
brave
action
by
him
and
it
it
made
an
important
point
that
there
a
real
commitment
to
what
can
be
a
local
autonomy.
I
guess
is
my
new
word
for
for
this
time,
what
can
be
good
local
economy
for
broad
for
the
future
of
broadband
and
that's
a
really
important
concept,
and
it's
not
only
the
facilitating
of
wi-fi
capabilities.
A
A
I
hope
it
is
that
thinking
and
that
spirit
and
that
good
community
effort
that
the
mayor
can
bring
to
washington
again
at
this
time,
as
I
think
we
can
work
towards
a
bit
of
better
reasoning
and
understanding
and
good
luck
in
the
efforts
of
the
mayor
going
there
and
and
and
what
can
be
just
hopefully
a
conversation
we
can
all
just
want
to
take
part
in
and
and
be
a
part
of
and
contribute
to
and
and
not
fight
each
other
about
it.
Thank
you.
N
N
We
are
going
to
suffer
horrendously
through
climate
change,
the
rest
of
our
lives.
I
I
just
wish
our
leaders
could
honestly
just
say
to
themselves:
I'm
not
going
to
fly,
I'm
not
going
to
fly
and
I
push
for
bike
lanes.
You
know
mayor's
bike
lanes
and
we're
pushing
for
all
of
these
alternatives,
and
yet
we
think
that
that
getting
on
that
airplane
this
one
time
it's
acceptable.
We
can.
N
N
Our
mayor
needs
to
say
I'm
not
getting
on
a
plane,
maybe
limit
all
of
our
travel
period
on
planes
and
show
an
honest
commitment
and
the
only
time
you
get
on
one
is
you're,
going,
maybe
to
a
funeral
to
a
loved
one
to
visit
a
family
member
once
a
year,
whatever
that
kind
of
thing,
but
we
need
to
stop
flying.
That's
that's
what
I've
got
to
say
thanks.
H
D
B
D
F
This
is
what
they're
not
talking
about
is
that
they
were
saying
that
if
you
get
this,
the
first
one
that
you're
gonna
be
fine,
everything
is
gonna,
be
fine
now
to
make
these
expectations
that
anything
that
comes
out,
because
what
this
does
is
it's
setting
a
precedent.
It's
that
sneaky
and
it's
what
it's
doing.
Is
it's
stating
that
now
we're
conditioning
the
public
anytime?
We
mandate
something
you
do
it
with
your
body
or
that's
it
you
can't
live.
F
This
is
getting
very
close
to
hand
over
the
papers,
nazi
jeremy,
nuremberg,
that's
how
close
we're
getting
it's
subtle
and
that's
how
it
happens.
It's
the
frog
in
the
water
incremental
change!
This
happens.
This
happens.
Oh,
this
is
no
big
deal
all
of
a
sudden
wow.
The
hammer
hits
and
people
die.
People
get
killed.
People
are
just
going
to
be
completely
happy
that
perella,
scott
niece
and
all
of
his
whole
billionaire
boys
club
homeboys,
are
creating
for
this
city.
F
We
see
you
homeboy,
we
ain't
gonna
stand
for
it
I'll
tell
you
that,
but
as
far
as
the
boosters
absolutely
not,
he
is
not
a
medical
professional.
He
has
absolutely
no
experience
in
this
field
and
for
this
man
to
sit
there
who's,
obviously,
a
social
base
of
jesuit
here's,
the
jesuit.
These
are
the
guys
that
made
the
deal
with
burnett.
F
R
That's
so
the
opposite:
all
you
people
take
as
many
booster
shots
as
you
want.
I
want
you
guys
to
take
as
many
as
pfizer
and
all
these
other
pharmaceutical
companies
are
gonna
make,
because
you
know
what
you
got
you
guys
deserve
to
be
the
sheep
following
these
ridiculous
orders
from
dr
fauci
and
everything
else.
R
As
you
can
see,
one
shot
from
johnson
johnson
is
going
to
be
okay,
one
and
then
nope.
I
gotta
have
what
two
or
three
more.
I
don't
even
know,
because
I
don't
care,
but
if
hey,
if
it's
for
city
workers
they
want
to,
they
want
to
count
out
of
their
unions,
federal
government,
gavin
newsom,
you
guys,
you
guys
go
you
guys,
go
right
ahead.
R
You
guys
go
right
ahead
and,
of
course
I
want
san
jose
pd
to
have
to
do
it.
You
know
they
always
make
you
do
things.
You
don't
want
to
do
like
sign
some
ridiculous
citation.
Yeah
we'll
see
what
happens.
We'll
see
what
happens
with
you
guys.
You
guys
go
right
ahead.
Take
those
booster
shots,
follow
dr
fauci
and
let's
go
brandon.
You
guys
follow
those
guys.
You
go
ride
it.
I
want.
You
to
I
want
you
guys
to
take
every
single
booster.
There
is,
and
you
know,
who's
gonna
laugh
last
it
ain't.
It's
gonna.
R
Be
me,
it's
gonna!
Be
me
because
you
guys
are
you
guys
are
following
a
bad
road
and
and
why
on
earth
should
the
taxpayers
have
to
be
paying
for
all
these
things?
People
should
be
able
to
decide
themselves,
but
hey,
take
a
look
just
like
what
paul
said.
What
nazi
germany
did,
what
you
guys
are
doing
gun
grabbing.
You
know
heavy
police
force
forced
inoculations
carrying
papers.
You
can't
even
go
to
see
a
christmas
show
in
one
of
your
city-owned
theaters
you
gotta
show
papers.
Please
you
guys
are
disgusting.
R
B
A
Hi,
thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
for
this
item.
Thanks
for
paul's
words
on
this
item
I
mean
it's
my
own
personal
feeling
that
we're
going
through
kind
of
a
form
of
a
genocide
in
the
new
in
the
way
of
trying
to
develop
long-term
social
planning
goals
for
us
as
a
human
society,
and
I
I
don't-
I
don't
think
we
have
to
do
this
to
ourselves
in
the
future
to
create
that
good,
sustainable
future.
A
We've
all
been
talking
about
for,
like
a
number
of
years
before
kobit
we're
trying
to
build
something,
really
important,
positive
and
sustainable.
We
can
do
this
without
having
these
major
pandemics
or
our
9
11
wars
in
order
to
work
towards
our
future
social
good,
and
I
think
we're
all
aware
of
that.
So
we
are
addressing
these
booster
issues
very
cautiously.
I
think
this
next
month
is
going
to
be
really
difficult
for
ourselves.
I
think
we're
all
learning
chicago
is
doing
some
important
steps
with
his
teaching
programs
right
now.
A
Community
public
health
and
safety
is
incredibly
important,
but
I
think
we're
also
hoping
that
by
beginning
where's,
your
shoes
by
by
beginning
of
february,
I
think
we're
hoping
that
the
omicron
is
going
to
be
more
understandable
and
manageable
for
all
the
difficulties
we're
going
to
have
this
month.
So
I
hope
you
proceed
very
cautiously
with
this
item
and
not
make
it
so
much
mandatory,
but
simply
ask
make
it
an
ass
of
what
good
city
government
workers
can
do.
A
I
think
a
lot
of
them
will
want
to
and
for
those
who,
don't
you
know,
offer
weekly
tests
offer
that
if
they
don't
want
to
take
it
offer
them
compassion
and
and
an
effort
to
negotiate
with
them,
don't
make
it
so
strict.
You
know
we
can
get
through
this.
I
think
that's
our
goal
is
to
get
through
this
era
this
time
with
our
sanity
and
realize
somebody's
done
some
pretty
insane
things
to
ourselves.
Let's
deal
with
as
rationally
as
we
can.
Thank
you.
C
I
That's
great
vice
mayor
council
members.
Yes,
we
did
provide
an
early
consideration
response
form,
there's
basically
two
bodies
of
work
here,
one
that
deals
with
the
additional
eligible
booster
mandate
for
employees
and
a
second
body
of
work
that
pertains
to
updating
city
facilities
ordinances.
We
have
green
lit
both
of
those.
I
I
H
We
spent
a
number
of
meetings
in
closed
session
discussing
the
initial
vaccine
mandate
program
and
I
do
think
that's
the
most
appropriate
place
for
that.
I
think
there
were
some
timelines.
The
mayor
put
in
his
memo
as
far
as
establishing
a
january
date
for
the
mandate
and
then
obviously
you
know,
I
think
that
that
would
be
debatable
depending
on
how
the
closed
session
conversation
goes
and
then,
ultimately,
how
the
conversations
go
with
our
bargain
units.
So
that's
just
one
concern
that
I
have
is.
H
I
don't
necessarily
want
to
to
approve
the
language,
as
is
that
would
state
that
you,
you
know
that
we're
attempting
to
establish
this
january
date.
It
was
that
the
intent
of
the
city
manager's
office,
with
your
green,
lit
response
that
you
were
aiming
towards
this
january
date.
Or
would
you
say
that
you're
you're
the
reason
you're
referencing
it
too
close
session-
is
that
that
decision
should
be
made
ultimately,
after
a
closed
session
discussion.
O
H
Perfect
that
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
clear,
because
I'm
willing
to
move
the
item,
but
I
I
I
wasn't
comfortable
with
with
that
date,
and
I
do
appreciate
that
we'll
have
the
conversation
closed
session
first.
Secondly,
I
think
the
same
concern,
which
is
this
late
january
again.
It
was
a
preferred
date
by
the
mayor
as
a
statement,
but
I
think
we'd
want
to
converse
with
our
operators
of
these
city-owned
facilities.
H
Pre-Planned
tickets
were
purchased
and
then,
when
the
vaccine
became
available
for
children,
the
concern
was
that
we
would
then
implement
quickly
the
the
same
mandate
that
we
have
had
for
adults,
that
we
would.
We
would
mandate
that
for
children
and
that,
ultimately,
there
wasn't
enough
time
to
get
all
the
children
that
were
in
the
performance
and
then,
ultimately,
all
the
children
that
would
want
to
attend
there
just
wouldn't
be
enough
time
to
get
them
vaccinated
and
we're
seeing
that
now
with
the
surge,
even
in
just
testing.
H
I
know
from
unfortunate
personal
experience
in
regards
to
the
length
of
lines
in
the
hours
of
weight
just
to
to
get
a
test
right
now
at
kaiser,
for
instance,
and
and
similarly
you
know
there
is
a
long
wait
for
individuals
that
are
going
to
get
their
children
vaccinated
as
schools.
Attempting
to
come
back
in,
and
so
my
concern
with
the
timeline
there
is
is
the
same
thing
that
we
we
rush
a
decision
here
and
ultimately
have
some
unintended
consequences
and
that's.
H
H
Okay,
thank
you.
So,
with
those
considerations,
that's
really
the
only
distinguishing
difference
I
I'll
make
within
the
motion
is
that
removing
the
suggested
timelines
that
exist
in
the
mayor's
memo
today
and
then
having
the
city,
employee
mandate,
expansion
being
referred
to
closed
session
and
then
the
the
other
discussion
at
the
the
council
meeting.
That's
the
motion
thanks.
J
Yeah
I
was
holding
back
my
second,
because
I
would
I
don't
agree
with
removing
the
january
language
from
the
memo
and
I'll.
Just
explain
why
it's
those
the
language
seems
looks
to
me
as
aspirational
as
a
as
a
goal,
but
not
necessarily
as
a
requirement.
The
one
on
vaccine
for
vaccines
for
employees
says
begin
discussing
with
the
employee,
with
our
bargaining
units.
J
The
with
the
ideas,
the
idea
of
doing
this
with
a
goal
of
the
end
of
january,
but
that
doesn't
mean
that
that's
where
it's
going
to
end
up-
and
I
think
it's
important
to
say
that
this-
that
you
know
we
have
the
intention
of
moving
quickly
and
trying
to
cut
and
trying
to
adjust
for
the
rapidly
changing
conditions
that
we're
under.
So
I
think
it's
important
to
keep
that
date
in
there
and
as
far
as
the
other
one.
J
Yes,
there
are
issues
with
getting
people
done
quickly,
and
I
think
that
the
the
final
ordinance
can
be
can
be
crafted
in
a
way
that
allows
for
the
fact
that,
obviously
there's
a
timeline.
Nobody
who's
been
vaccinated
with
their
second
dose
in
the
last.
At
this
point,
five
to
six
months
would
be
able
to
get
their
booster
or
therefore
we
couldn't
require
it,
but
we
would
have
a
policy
in
place
by
the
end
of
january,
which
would
be
my
objective.
I
see
that
the
statement
says
implemented.
J
So
I
think
it's
really
important
we're
in
a
fast-moving
pandemic,
a
really
fast-moving
variant
right
now
that
you
know,
if
we,
if
we
wait,
I
think
we're
going
to
find
ourselves
in
a
world
of
trouble.
I
think
it's
important
that
we're
first
recognized
that
were
in
this
together
and
that
everybody's
gonna
have
to
do
their
part
to
get
us
out,
and
it's
important
for
us
to
do
things
without
delay
in
this
circumstance
and
say
that
we
can.
J
We
can't
just
wait
for
everybody
to
be
on
board
for
everybody
to
to
have
a
weeks
and
weeks
of
conversation
when
we're
in
a
situation
like
we're
in
right
now.
So
that's
the
reason
I
didn't.
Second,
it
that's
the
reason
I
prefer
to
leave
the
language
in
there.
It
sort
of
indicates
a
preference
of
the
item
which,
obviously
isn't
even
council,
approved
yet,
but
it
indicates
a
preference
of
a
rapid
timeline
so
that
that's
that's
what
I'll
say
about
that.
I
I
have
a
couple
of
beyond
that.
I
would
hope.
J
Well
first,
I
guess
I
would
ask
whether
councilman
carlos
would
reconsider
removing
that
language
in
light
of
what
I
suggested,
given
that
there's
a
guarantee
that
this
has
to
go
to
closed
session
for
the
employer
portion,
because
it's
a
negotiated,
it
would
have
to
be
discussed.
That's
what
the
memo
says.
Therefore,
it's
going
to
come
to
closed
session.
It's
not
something
we
have
to
ask
for.
J
Specifically
it's
going
to
be
it's
asking
for
us
to
move
to
those
conversations,
and
then
the
other
piece
on
the
end
of
january
tells
us
that,
where
we
want
to
have
by
the
end
of
january,
something
in
place
that
sets
a
guideline
of
rules,
that's
going
to
get
people
to
move
towards
getting
the
booster,
that's
healthy!
So
I'll.
Ask
whether
that
we
reconsider
that
removal
of
that
language.
J
The
other
second
question
is
on
or
the
second
one
asking
for
a
friendly
amendment,
which
is
pretty
minor,
but
in
the
first
paragraph
it
says
complete
a
third
round
of
vaccination.
I
would
just
suggest
that
we
change
it
to
say
receive
a
booster,
because
some
people
obviously
had
a
j
j
one
shot,
regiment
and
wouldn't
have
wouldn't
be
getting
three.
So
it's
just
a
a
minor
change,
I
think,
would
be
clearer.
J
I
appreciate
your
staff
input
lighting
this.
I
think
everybody
agrees
to
the
importance
of
making
sure
that
we're
all
safe
in
the
in
this
wave
that
we're
in
right
now
I
do
have
a
question
for
staff,
I
don't
know
angel
or
dolan
or
somebody.
There
are
obviously
companies
out
there
and
other
organizations
that
are
providing
testing,
and
obviously
we
had
had
this
discussion
before
about
saying
that
employees
who
are
unvaccinated
need
to
get
tested,
and
I
think
that
would
be
a
pcr
test
requirement
on
their
own
time.
J
We
still
don't
want
people
on
site
with
who
are
infected,
and
so
I'm
just
wondering
whether
we've
considered
providing
rapid
testing
rapid
antigen
testing
for
employees
who
are
coming
into
the
office
or
coming
in
on
site,
particularly
like
people
like
firefighters
who
are
working
in
close
quarters
and
others
who
need
to
be
together.
Our
dispatchers
and
others.
Have
we
considered
providing
testing
and
finding
funding
to
do
that?.
O
We
are
so
we
are
working
on
kind
of
a
backup
plan
to
the
county
testing
because
they
are
a
little
overloaded,
although
I
do
have
to
say
it's
gotten
better
in
the
last
couple
days.
So
I've
heard
that,
depending
on
when
you
look
at
the
site,
things
open
up-
and
sometimes
you
can-
even
if
you
look
at
it
at
the
right
time,
you
can
get
a
same-day
appointment,
so
I
do
think
they're
opening
up
appointments
as
quickly
as
they
can.
O
But
our
backup
plan
for
our
unvaccinated
is
that
we
have
purchased
some
rapid
tests
that
were
waiting
to
get
shipped
to
us.
Our
preference,
though,
is
definitely
the
pcr
test
and
to
continue
to
have
employees
take
that,
but
in
the
event
we
can.
We
can't
do
that
or
they're
not
able
to
because
of
backup
and
testing.
Then
we
would
use
those
rapid
tests.
J
Yeah
and
just
to
be
clear,
my
question
wasn't
about
unvaccinated
because
I
do
believe
you're
right
that
we
need
to
do
pcr
testing
for
unvaccinated,
and
I'm
also
was
my
daughter,
was
in
line
for
four
hours
the
other
day
and
then
got
turned
away
at
the
end
of
it.
I
know
it
was
bad
before,
but
hopefully
it's
going
to
be
better,
but
but
pcr
is
important
for
unvaccinated.
I
was
referring
to
our
vaccinated
employees
and
whether
we
put
in
place
a
policy
that
says
for
vaccinated
employees
who
are
coming
into
the
office.
J
C
C
I
I
Chime
in
yes
go
ahead,
my
apologies.
I
understand
there
was
an
earlier
call
for
response,
and
I
wasn't
here
for
it.
So
thanks
for
your
patience,
just
on
the
issue
with
timing,
I
just
only
heard
third
hand,
since
I
wasn't
present
for
the
conversation
that
there
was
some
concern
around
timing
and
perhaps
delaying
to
have
an
opportunity
to
talk
in
closed
session.
I
just
want
to
suggest
look.
I
I
I
think
our
staff
has
been
engaged
in
these
conversations
for
several
weeks
and
they're
going
to
bring
to
us
a
more
specific
recommendation
around
the
timing
of
the
imposition
of
this
that
that
comports,
with
their
understanding
of
how
fast
it's
going
to
take,
how
long
it's
going
to
take
and
how
fast
people
can
really
move.
You
know
those
very
important
conversations
with
our
employees.
I
know
have
been
ongoing
and-
and
so
I'd
expect,
of
course,
on
the
morning
before
our
vote
on
this,
I
would
hope
would
be
on
the
25th.
J
J
Yeah
yeah,
so
I'm
there
isn't
any
date
for
bringing
this
to
council
in
the
memo.
Is
the
plan
that
we
would
add
this
to
next
week's
agenda
so
that
we
would
have
this
conversation,
especially
on
the
public-facing
elements
of
it
next
week,
so
that
we'd
be
prepared
for
what's
coming
considering,
especially
since
they
don't
have
a
meeting
on
the
18th.
I
H
D
S
S
S
I'm
hurt
that
I
live
in
san
jose
because
nobody
has
helped
these
folks
at
all
and
to
date
only
the
county
has
stepped
in
sam.
You
are
right,
your
greatest
failure
is
the
unhoused,
and
so
is
everybody
on
that
committee
and
I
don't
know
how
any
of
you
think
you
can
run
for
mayor
because
you
do
not
represent
the
unhoused,
I'm
disgusted
with
you
all
and
I'm
sorry.
S
R
Yeah,
you
guys
had
a
nice
little
two
or
three
week
vacation
thanks
to
the
taxpayer.
I
guess
some
of
you
guys
were
furloughed,
oh
well,
I
don't
care.
You
know
we
got
a
lot
of
crime
going
on
district
nine
pam's.
Not
there
they
were.
Is
she
off
selling
some
real
estate
or
talking
alone,
to
somebody
for
less
percentage?
Who
knows
what
she
does
all
day?
R
Besides,
try
to
run
her
try
to
run
her
district,
but
district
nines
had
a
lot
of
crime,
shooting
at
oak
ridge,
never
caught
the
shooter,
never
found
the
person
shot
smashed
out
windows
all
at
asian,
owned
businesses.
By
the
way
you
don't
hear
that
do
you,
the
city
tries
to
cover
up
their
their
nonchalance
of
everything,
got
smashed
out
windows.
Oh
hey!
We
had
a
synagogue
burned
down
too
in
district
nine
nice.
You
know
what
do
you
got?
You
got
a
gu.
R
You
got
a
cop
on
a
german
motorcycle
with
german
weapons
asking
for
paper
burned
out
to
see
burned
out
synagogues,
broken
windows.
What's
that
sound
like
to
everybody?
Oh,
don't
forget
those
police
dogs
that
they
buy
for
what
twenty
thousand
dollars
or
more
that
come
from
germany.
Let's
see,
we've
got
a
one:
half
billion
dollar
police
budget.
That
does
nothing.
R
R
Has
any
of
them
solve
that
that
the
technology
samurai?
Listen
your
technology?
Let
me
get
some
more
tech
from
mayor
pete.
When
you
go
go.
Do
your
meeting
in
washington
dc
to
see
let's
go,
brandon
yeah,
yeah,
real
great
district
pam
hope.
Maybe
one
of
your
staff
is
listening
great
job
with
district
nine
in
the
last
couple
weeks:
nothing
but
climb
and
mayhem.
R
It's
unbelievable!
You
gotta
watch
your
pack,
your
porch
for
packages,
package,
thieves,
it's
unbelievable!
This
this
city
is.
This
is
going
to
go
by
the
way
of
detroit.
If
the
tech
industry
ever
goes
out,
which
it
will
it'll
always
fit
all
remember:
sun
micro
systems,
it's
not
there
yeah
it's
going
to
eventually.
A
yeah,
you
know
it's
my
feeling
that
you
know
open
public
policies
and
their
good
guideline
to
tech
and
data
collection.
It
can
really
help
the
accountability
ideas
it
can
help
organize.
You
know
the
surveillance
and
tech
and
law
enforcement
questions
and
just
invite
a
whole
community
process
to
what
can
be
our
sustainable
future
practices.
I
mean
all
parts
of
the
community.
I
mean
it's
interesting
to
consider
how
to
invite
all
parts
of
the
community
to
a
process,
and
I
think
it's
the
open
public
policy
ideas
to
get
people
excited
about
that.
A
That's
our
sustainable
future.
I
mean
that's
positive
and
that's
hopeful
stuff
yeah
and
invites
everyone.
So
good
luck
how
you
can
work
on
those
things
that
can
help
organize
how
to
talk
about
the
law
enforcement
questions
at
this
time
and
do
it
in
a
way
that
is
peace
as
ideas
of
peace
and
sustainability,
and
so
good
luck,
good
luck!
We
don't
have
to
incarcerate.
We
can
simply
offer
good
practices
and
the
health
and
human
services
reimagine.
That
is
the
good
work
we
can
do
at
this
time.
A
A
If
there
could
be
a
simple
way
at
orders
of
the
day
to
simply
mention
you
know
those
four
subjects
that
can
be
a
time
for
open
public
comment
to
offer
a
simple
phrase
like
that
orders
of
the
day,
I
think,
can
really
be
helpful
to
just
make
a
more
accessible
public
meeting
process
in
our
future,
and
hopefully
we
can
talk
more
about
that
idea.
This
this
early
part
of
2022.,
thanks
again
for
the
meeting
and
hi
to
everyone.
K
K
When
I
make
a
reasonable
request
for
her
to
ask
a
question,
she
asks
it
and
her
staff
is
wonderful,
I'll,
be
moving
into
d2
love
love,
you
sergio
look
forward
to
being
my
council
person
and
that's
a
great
segue
for
a
letter
I
wrote,
which
will
be
in
the
packet
next
week.
Saying
the
city
of
san
jose
needs
to
tell
us.
If
we've
been
moved
into
a
new
district.
Okay,
you
guys
really
need
to
put
out
postcards.
K
You
need
to
respect
us.
I
have
asked
housing
for
an
updated
list
for
which
mobile
home
parks
are
in
which
district,
because
that
is
going
to
change.
So
please
treat
us
with
respect.
The
process
was
horrible
redistricting.
I
don't
blame
you
guys,
but
none
of
you
should
have
voted
on
it.
It
should
have
been
a
blue
ribbon
commission,
but
it's
done
now.
So
please
give
the
citizens
the
respect
and
dignity
of
advising
us
which
council
district
that
we're
now
in.
Thank
you.
M
M
M
I
know
we
have
five
tiny
village
sites
that
only
supports
400
of
the
9
000
unhoused,
I
mean
that's
a
drop
in
the
bucket.
That's
that's
like
you're,
hardly
even
trying,
where
are
all
the
non-profits
working
together
to
address
this.
Why
isn't
the
city
put
into
zones
so
people
who
want
to
help
know
that
they're
helping
an
area
that
isn't
also
being
inundated?
It's
so
easy
to
drop
off
at
columbus
park,
because
you
can
just
drive
on
pavement.
It's
all
the
people
that
are
off
the
beaten
path
that
are
under
tunnels.
M
I
went
out
on
sunday
looking
for
an
area
and
literally
we
had
to
go
into
the
berryessa
flea
market
and
it
was
a
security
guard
that
figured
out
where
we
were
looking
to
support
some
people.
So
you
know
the
obvious
sites
branham
and
monterey
when's
that
going
to
happen
what's
taking
so
long.
I
I'm
on
a
team
called
tijuana
ministry.
M
F
F
Oh
somebody's
messing
with
my
phone
man,
hello.
Can
you
hear
me?
Okay,
good,
go
to
that
sunset
downtown
association.
They
announced
what
what
council
members
were
in
attendance
at
that
now
what
scott
niece
is
doing,
planning
on
behalf
dilla
of
gary
dillable,
eric
hayden,
jeff
arriaga,
and
all
these
other
players
is
genocide.
This
is
the
plan.
Perales
is
right
there
with
him.
That's
why
they
want
him,
because
he
has
the
power
connected
to
the
police,
the
police
department.