►
A
Have
to
be
thinking
or
talking
just
here,
so
welcome
everyone
to
the
joint
meeting
for
rules
known
from
government
community
committee
for
the
whole
for
Wednesday
March
11th.
We
have
everyone
present,
so
there's
a
quorum,
we'll
start
with
a
review
of
the
agenda
for
March,
17th
and
I'll.
Ask
it
for
any
changes.
A
C
We're
working
we'll
be
working
with
the
manager's
office
to
find
the
room
for
a
closed
session
I
think
the
existing
conference
room
doesn't
really
meet
our
social
distancing
me
requirements
and,
and
the
other
thing
is
when
staff
comes
in
and
they're
all
sitting
out
in
the
green
room
and
so
I
think
we're
trying
to
find
a
there's
other
places,
whether
we
do
it
in
here
or
the
Dyess
or.
However,
we
do
it.
Yeah.
C
C
A
A
All
right
so,
for
the
record
says
action
related
in
more
21,
fictions
and
income
lost
due
to
Cove
at
19,
and
there
appear
to
be
three
items.
One
is
approving
an
ordinance
establish
the
moratorium
for
non-payment
of
rent
evictions
for
tents
with
incomes
affected
by
novel
coronavirus.
The
second
has
adopted
an
urgency
ordinance
establishes
a
moratorium
from
non-payment
of
rent
for
tenants
with
incomes
affected
by
kovat,
nineteen
and
third
discuss
and
direct
the
city
attorney
to
return
with
the
ordinance
and
recursions.
The
ordinance
establishes
more
trend
for
non-payment
of
rent
for
small
business.
A
A
D
A
A
C
A
E
B
A
B
E
E
E
With
that
I
ask
that
you
approve
the
monthly
report
as
well
as
add
a
few
items
onto
various
council
committee
work
plans,
specifically
the
audit
of
fire
safety
code,
compliance
to
the
community
and
economic,
develop
development
committees,
April
27th
agenda,
the
audit
of
fleet
maintenance
to
the
transportation
environmental
committees
may
4th
agenda
the
audit
of
park,
maintenance
to
the
Neighborhood,
Services
and
education
communities
may
14th
agenda
and
the
audit
of
development
fee
work
in
progress
reserves
to
the
Community
and
Economic
Development
committees.
May
18th
agenda
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
E
Now
we're
just
in
information
gathering
phase
we're
just
kind
of
finalizing
what
we're
gonna
be
looking
at.
Looking
we're
looking
at
a
lot
of
different
things,
whether
it's
just
a
number
over
time
and
just
looking
at
what
the
staffing
has
looked
like
for
the
last
whatever
number
of
years
are
gonna
go
back
as
far
as
we
can
we're
gonna
be
looking
at
kind
of
the
composition.
We're
gonna
be
like
in
a
lot
of
different
things:
the
specific
objectives
we
haven't
really
nailed
down.
D
E
E
D
E
A
A
You
know
as
we're
rebuilding
this
department
part
of
the
challenges
we
know
expectations
rise
faster
than
our
ability
to
staff,
and
there
are
lots
of
units
we
all
want
to
restore
quickly,
whether
it's
you
know,
traffic
enforcement
or
sexual
assaults
or
whole
host
of
things,
and
so
essentially
I'm
just
looking
for
more
ways
to
be
able
to
get
officers
into
all
those
units,
and
so
it
would
really
be
helpful
to
have
an
additional
sort
of
an
update
on.
What's
happened
to
civilian
ization.
Are
there
any
more
opportunities
for?
A
E
E
A
A
So
I
know
we
could
not
take
action
last
week,
so
I
think
the
question
I
had
posed
I,
don't
think
it
was
made
into
a
formal
motion
was
really
you
know
why?
Wouldn't
we
just
direct
everybody
to
sit
down
with
Barry
newsgroup
come
to
some
agreement
about
how
we
can
release
these
records
in
a
way
that
will
get
the
most
relevant
information
out
quickly
and
perhaps
through
that
process
allow
some
iteration
that
will
enable
us
to
determine
whether
we
really
need
to
dig
deeper
on
some
records
or
not
and
perhaps
provide
some
priority.
A
C
The
the
concept
of
an
agreement-
you
know,
I'm,
not
adverse
to
I,
mean
anything
you
can
get.
Okay.
What
it
gets
down
to
is
you
need
to
have
a
realistic
timelines
and
there's
something
we
need.
If
were
saying,
the
city
needs
to
perform.
We
want
to
make
sure
the
department
has
timelines
that
they're
going
to
be
able
to
meet
and
then
what
possible
remedies?
Obviously,
I
want
to
know
what
we
have
in
mind.
C
It's
obviously
something
we
have
to
negotiate,
but
sitting
down
walking
through
this
we've
had
meetings
in
the
past
is
not
something
I'm
adverse
to.
Ultimately,
I
want
to
bring
it
to
the
council,
at
least
with
the
potential
for
get
their
feedback
at
fifth
there's
any
concerns
on
their
part,
but
the
the
only
concern
I
have
is
to
make
sure
are
any
any
timelines.
We
agree
to
are
things
that
we
know
we
could
meet,
and
you
know
that's
that's
part
of
the
negotiation
right
and
I
guess
I
just
so.
C
C
My
think,
we're
all
in
on
that
so
I
think
we're
already
making
that
shift
in
pivot,
but
I
think
that
would
be
helpful
to
us,
because
you
know
I
think
what
we're
saying
is
we're
not
trying
to
dismiss
it,
be
dismissive
of
the
request
or
we're
eager
to
respond
to
it.
But
it's
just
a
tremendous
amount
of
work
and
so
I
think
we're.
You
know
we're
prepared
to
make
that
adjustment
and
if
it
needs
to
be
through
a
discussion
or
I,
think
we're
open
to
that.
Okay,.
F
G
The
only
issue
I
have
with
entering
into
any
type
of
agreement
is
what
the
realistic
expectation
is.
We've
already
said
that
the
issues
we
have
we're
narrowing
down
and
whittling
away
the
best
practice
internally,
how
we're
gonna
take
on
this
project.
When
you
talk
about
prior
PRA
requests
and
and
1421
issues,
we're
talking
apples
and
oranges,
we
we
had
and
lieutenant
cook
will
get
it
can
get
into
this
specifics.
G
But
yeah
we
had
two
people
working
on
Department
PRA
requests
before
now
we're
working
on
20
years
of
what's
required
in
1421,
which
is
a
huge
amount
of
data
and
information
that
needs
to
be
put
out
and
we're
talking
about.
You
know
the
reality
of
how
we
deal
with
that.
What's
the
best
way
is
there?
G
Are
there
we're
putting
out
RFI's
and
planned
about
put
out
RFPs
on
potential
software
solutions,
and/or
being
able
to
contract
out
with
somebody
to
help
us
out
these
issues,
and
we
need
staffing,
I
mean
that's
really
what
it
comes
down
to.
We
need
people
to
do
the
work
and
you
know
I,
understand.
You're
gonna
entertain
the
agreement
aspect
of
it
with
bang,
but
the
expectations
have
to
be
there,
which
the
work
still
needs
to
be
done
well,.
A
G
And
you
know
I
get
that
mr.
mayor,
it
I
just
I,
want
to
remind
you
that
we
have
met.
The
department
has
met
with
mr.
Robinson
in
his
group
regarding
this
we've
explained
where
we
are
and
where
we're
going
and
how
we're
gonna
get
there
and
that's
exactly
what
would
happen
if
the
city
was
sued
over
this
and
a
judge
was
to
implement.
We
would
be
in
the
exact
same
spot,
so
I
know
he's.
A
Not
here
now
at
least
appears
he's
not
here
now,
but
you
know
the
way
he
described
it
when
he
was
here
last
week
was
yeah.
We
met,
they
agreed
to
a
certain
rate
at
which
some
reports
be
produced,
they're
not
even
meeting
that
even
at
a
goal
of
two
years
production,
and
so
you
can
understand
that
that
meeting
didn't
work,
at
least
from
their
standpoint,
I
mean
how
many,
how
many
reports
can
we
say-
we've
turned
over
at
this,
so.
C
A
F
Therefore,
every
three
additional
cases
we
require
we
would
need
an
additional
month
right,
so
that
was
where
the
three
per
month
came
from.
It
wasn't
a
problems
to
do
three
every
month,
right,
just
very
obviously,
as
we
ramped
up
we're
going
to
be
doing
fewer
during
the
ramp
up
and
a
lot
more
at
the
end
in
order
to
meet
that
objective
that
we
that
we
promised,
but
I
do
have
some
prepared
comments
that
address
some
of
the
things
that
were
brought
before
okay
last
week.
So
I
am
lieutenant
Paul
Koch
of
the
sounds.
F
A
police
force,
research
and
development
unit
with
me
today
is
our
Assistant
Chief
of
Police
and
off,
and
our
deputy
chief
of
police
Mota
one
of
my
units.
At
the
reason,
one
of
my
jobs
at
the
research
and
development
unit
is
to
address
public
records,
requests
and
I'm
here
this
afternoon.
To
speak
to
the
question
of
why
San
Jose,
Police
Department,
release
of
records
appears
to
be
behind
the
pace
of
other
similar
organizations.
F
F
The
San
Diego
Sheriff's
Department
has
released
records
from
80
use
of
force
and
disciplinary
matters,
while
San
Jose
is
released
records
from
only
13.
In
making
this
comparison,
we
should
consider
the
difference
between
the
number
of
events
versus
the
number
of
pages
that
an
agency
has
released
records,
for
it
is
also
telling
to
consider
the
effect
of
staffing
on
work
output.
F
F
So
with
three
times
the
number
of
non
sworn
personnel
and
some
employee
has
a
San,
Diego,
Sheriff's
Department
processed
and
released
three
times
as
many
records
as
compared
to
San
Jose.
If
you
measure
by
the
number
of
events
for
which
records
have
been
released,
they
have
accomplished
about
six
times
as
much
as
we
have,
but
I
believe
that
Counting,
the
number
of
cases
for
which
records
have
been
released
is
far
less
informative
than
County.
The
number
of
pages
that
have
been
released.
This
metric
accounts
for
the
wide
variance
in
the
volume
of
pages
per
event.
F
As
an
example,
today,
I
have
brought
our
largest
officer-involved
shooting
case.
Our
smallest
disciplinary
record
in
a
typical
force
case
involve
a
great
bodily
injury,
because
this
disciplinary
incident
is
more
than
six
years
old,
which
is
beyond
our
ia
retention
time.
It's
the
only
remaining
record.
The
department
possesses
is
this
two-page
letter
of
discipline
from
the
officers
permanent
personnel
folder.
In
contrast,
the
first
case
we
released
was
for
an
officer-involved
shooting.
It
is
two
thousand
five
hundred
and
thirty
six
pages
in
the
photographic
material.
F
The
GBI
case
that
I
have
on
the
table
is
that
is
typical
for
such
a
case.
At
48
pages
of
written
and
photographs
today,
San
Jose
Police
Department
has
released
about
4,500
pages
of
written
in
photographic
material
compared
to
the
San
Diego
Sheriff's
Department,
which
has
released
approximately
13,500
pages
of
similar
type
material.
F
This
amounts
to
three
times
more
production,
this
as
a
police
department,
which
is
consistent
with
their
agency
having
over
three
times
the
non-sworn
staffing
of
our
Police
borough.
But
despite
these
comparisons,
the
San
Jose
Police
Department
I,
would
like
our
production
times
to
be
faster,
which
really
leads
to
today's
primary
question.
Why
has
the
sounds?
A
Police
Department
not
released
our
records
more
quickly.
F
The
informational
memo
published
earlier
this
month
described
the
nature
of
this
work
and
gave
a
history
of
the
foundational
labor
that
went
into
identifying
the
work
and
creating
the
workflow,
but
those
tasks
are
done.
There
is
no
foundational
work
left
to
do
now.
It
is
simply
a
matter
of
having
our
non
sworn
personnel
work
through
and
release
the
material.
So
now
is
really
just
about
having
enough
people
to
do
the
work
prior
to
the
passage
of
SB
1420
one.
F
Our
department
manages
Public
Records
workload
with
a
team
of
two
analysts
who
also
performed
a
number
of
other
functions
in
response.
Sb
1420
one,
the
council
allotted
monies
to
hire
five
additional
personnel.
These
were
not
budgeted
until
July
and
three
of
the
positions
were
time
limited
with
funding
set
to
expire
this
summer.
So
we
did
not
even
start
recruiting
until
mid-year.
F
After
two
recruitments,
we
were
only
able
to
hire
one
senior
police
data
specialist,
so
we've
reclassified
the
two
Rumania
positions
to
analysts
and
began
recruiting
again
the
job
offers
were
accepted
for
both
positions
with
one
person
having
started
this
week
and
while
the
second
remains
in
the
background
process
late
in
2019
to
over
strength,
analyst
positions
were
added
to
the
workgroup
requiring
an
additional
recruitment.
Two
candidates
are
currently
in
backgrounds
for
those
positions.
F
It
is
important
to
note
that
these
have
been
very
hard
to
fill
due
to
the
undesirability
of
a
time-limited
job
offer
and
a
low
unemployment
economy,
and
do
the
necessity
that
candidates
pass
their
background
checks.
Our
new
hire
is
still
being
trained
and
three
positions
remain
unfilled.
In
2019,
the
once
sworn
officer
assigned
to
my
unit
was
sometimes
assisting
with
SB
1420
one
workload,
but
I
have
since
had
to
reassign
him
to
perform
public
records.
Work
related
to
SB
978.
F
Instead,
hiring
has
been
a
challenge,
but
once
these
positions
are
filled,
we
should
be
able
to
more
than
double
our
production
capacity.
The
reality
is
that,
in
order
to
attract
qualified
candidate,
I'm
sorry
qualify
personnel
to
this
work
group,
the
job
security
needs
to
be
stronger.
In
other
words,
these
positions
need
to
be
funded
permanently
or
at
a
minimum
and
longer
increments
than
one
year.
F
There
will
be
those
who
will
suggest
that
we
simply
reassign
our
sworn
or
not
sworn
personnel
from
other
parts
of
the
department
in
order
to
prioritizes
work,
but
our
non-sworn
staffing
is
already
very
low
Department
wide.
There
is
not
a
place
where
a
movement
personnel
will
not
compromise
some
other
function
of
the
department,
so
how
fast
this
work
gets
done
will
be
a
function
of
how
many
people
were
willing
to
hire
for
the
task.
What
we
have
now
is
clearly
not
sufficient.
I
would
like
to
close
by
discussing
budget
proposals.
F
Last
year's
budget
request
was
based
on
our
best
estimate
of
we
thought
we
needed
for
a
work
flow
that
we
were
unfamiliar
with.
In
contrast,
this
year's
budget
request
is
based
on
our
experience,
because
public
records
laws
continue
to
expand.
Our
budget
proposal
includes
a
larger
number
personnel
and
request
that
those
positions
be
given
permanent,
ongoing
funding
to
enhance
our
capacity
to
hire
retain
personnel.
Thank
you
thank.
A
H
H
H
Sort
of
anyway,
obviously,
the
police
department
has
its
perspective
on
why
we
are
where
we
are,
and
I
think
it's
clear
from
the
note
that
I
sent
to
many
of
you
and,
I
think,
was
part
of
your
part
of
your
agenda
packet.
I
have
perhaps
a
somewhat
different
perspective,
but
we
don't
need
to
talk
about
what
happened
in
the
past
when
you
talk
about
what's
gonna
happen
going
forward,
because
that's
what's
most
important,
I'm
encouraged
to
hear
that
the
police
department
thinks
it's
gonna
do
better.
H
To
give
us
a
schedule
for
the
release
of
records
have
not
impressed
me
two
years
to
fulfill
a
Public
Records
Act
request
is
better
than
four
years,
but
still
not
really
responsive
to
what
I
would
consider
to
be
timely
performance
under
the
law.
So
I
made
a
suggestion
to
the
Rules
Committee
as
to
how
I
think
we
might
accomplish
something
that
could
give
bang
and
the
public
the
assurances
that
these
records
will
be
released
in
a
timely
way
and
I'm
requesting
that
you
adopt
that
recommendation.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
You
I'll
disclose
my
own
experience
in
redacting
reports.
I
spent
eight
years
of
my
career
on
various
days
sitting
next
to
a
photocopy
machine
with
a
black
crayon
in
my
hand,
redacting,
police
and
federal
agent
reports.
That
would
then
have
to
turn
over
to
defense
counsel.
So
I
know
a
little
bit
about
the
grunt
work,
only
a
little
bit
about
the
ground
work.
That's
involved
yeah,
because
I
did
it
and
what
I
do
not
understand.
I
mean
I
was
informed
three
weeks
ago
that
we
were
going
to
have
this
shift.
A
The
shift
was
going
to
be
we'll
get
out
the
top
reports.
So
then
the
bear
news
group
can
at
least
look
at
the
breadth
of
the
cases
and
they
would
have
the
ten
or
fifteen
or
twenty
page
face
report
right.
The
top
report,
and
that
way,
at
the
very
least,
a
we
can
say
accurately.
We've
got
the
basic
information
out
there.
Not
obviously
we
got
to
do
a
lot
more
if
we're
gonna
get
a
an
officer-involved
shooting
of
that
engagement
out
the
door.
We
know
that
means
probably
video.
A
H
A
I
A
H
A
H
A
B
F
For
example,
this
this
report
here
that
we
have
in
front
of
us,
is
about
thirteen
photographs
and
it
is,
it
also
includes
a
complaint
filing
and
it
concludes
a
copy
of
the
blood
sample
that
was
taken,
and
then
you
get
down
to
about
40
40
48
pages.
So
you
get
down
to
about
35
pages
of
this.
That
is
the
essentially
the
vault
crime
report.
You
know
the
the
Senate
bill
has
required
us
to
release
a
lot
more
than
justice
agreed
right,
yeah.
A
F
So,
for
a
typical,
great
bodily
injury
case
this,
this
is
what
I
think
we
are
talking
about.
Is
this
part
of
the
essentially
what
we
most
people
would
call
the
crime
report
right,
and
you
know
when
you
look
at
officer-involved
shooting
the
crime
report
itself
even
accounts
for
probably
a
quarter
of
this,
so
the
crime
report
itself
is
reasonably
large
when
you
get
into
something
like
an
officer-involved
shooting
and
one
of
the
things
to
bear
in
mind.
Is
that
well
actually
not
in
the
first
five
years?
F
But
when
we
go
back
beyond
five
years
most
of
the
things
we
have
are
officer-involved
shootings,
so
so
this
is
certainly
less
work
than
what
the
law
requires
us
to
release
and
I.
Think
maybe
one
of
the
caveats
to
understand
is
that,
even
if,
if
we
give
this
the
Bayer
in
news
group-
and
they
tell
us
that
this
is
not
a
particular
case
where
we
want
the
rest
of
it-
that
there
are
29
other
requesters
who've
requested
these
things,
and
so
some,
if
any
one
person
in
that
retroactive
request
group,
says
no
I
want
it.
F
B
F
That's
actually,
where
we're
that's,
actually,
where
we
are
going,
that's
where
my
staff
is
doing
today
and
so
we're
not
gonna
be
doing
the
photographs.
Maybe
we're
gonna
be
doing
the
the
crime
report
per
se,
and
so
that
is
a
shift
we
have
made,
but
it's
just
it
just
takes
a
while
once
you
start
doing
it
differently
for
the
work
product
about
the
other
end
of
the
pipe
okay.
B
Not
and
the
reason
why
I'm
asking
that
question
is,
if
you
know,
I
had
a
magic
wand
and
we
were
able
to
get
all
the
reports
that
you
requested
done
right
now
and
delivered
to
you.
I
would
imagine
that
the
vast
majority
of
that
would
just
be
collecting
dust,
because
you
only
have
so
much
capacity
to
get
get
through
and
review
those
reports
so.
H
What
I
would
say
is
we
don't?
We
probably
don't
need
to
read
1200
pages
of
a
report
to
know
whether
it's
a
newsworthy
story
or
not
right,
and
you
know,
but
one
of
the
Sam
and
I
talked
about
the
question
of
sort
of
you
know.
Would
we
be
able
to
prioritize
cases
without
having
seen
them
and
what
I
said
to
him?
In
that
conversation
was
you
know?
H
Our
problem
is
that
we
don't
know
what
we
don't
know
when
it's
a
GBI
in
particular
it's
something
that
we've
never
written
about
before
sorry,
great
bodily
injury,
I
shouldn't
be
using
this.
That
kind
of
jargon,
whereas
the
officer-involved
shootings
are
almost
all
things
that
we've
written
about
before
we
know
those
cases
we
know
which
ones
raised,
questions
in
the
community
and
which
ones
didn't
the
great
bottle.
Injury
I,
don't
know,
I
need
something
to
see
to
make
a
judgment
so
something
like
a
13-page
or
whatever
it
was.
H
H
So
if
someone
just
to
be
responsible,
your
question-
if
someone
gave
us
these
these,
these
top
reports
for
20
cases,
I
could
I'm
sure
we
could
be
through
them
in
a
week
and
know
which
ones
we
would
want
more
on
I
have
a
I
have
a
reporter
who
does
nothing
but
14
21
right
now
and
has
been
doing
that
for
about
a
year,
and
it
takes
a
lot
less
time
to
read
a
case
than
it
does
to
produce
it.
Well,
the
police
department
I
may
disagree
on
how
long
it
takes
to
produce
a
case.
B
D
H
Believe
and
look
okay
me
if
I'm
wrong,
that
we
have
there
aren't
many
police
discipline
cases
and
I
think
we
have
some
material
on
all
those
cases,
although,
as
you
pointed
to
it's,
not
there's
not
a
lot
of
material
on
those
cases,
it's
it's.
It's
disciplinary
letters
that,
ranging
from
ranging
from
like
one
page
to
nine
pages
or
something
by
my
count,
I
think.
Once
we
get
into
conversation
about
these
cases,
we
can
probably
do
a
we
can.
H
We
can
probably
do
a
better
job
of
prioritizing
I
mean
I,
said
to
lieutenant
cook
that
case,
which
I'm
sure,
however
long
that
took-
and
we
might
disagree
on
how
long
it
should
have
taken
I'm
sure
that
took
a
fair
amount
of
time.
That
was
not
an
interesting
case
for
us.
The
DA
had
been
involved.
In
that
case,
there
had
been
a
fairly
significant
report.
Public
report
made
on
that
case,
so
it
didn't
produce
a
lot
of
news
which
I
would
have
told
the
department
right.
D
G
A
I
This
is
about
the
ability
of
a
defendant
to
challenge
the
credibility
of
an
officer
when
he
goes
up
on
to
the
stand,
and
we
don't
were
not
equipped
with
all
of
the
information
that
is
necessary
in
order
for
a
just
sentence
to
be
imposed,
and
so
we're
depriving
of
the
citizens
of
the
ability
to
cross-examine
that
leads
to
Fifth
Amendment
issues
of
due
process
and
Fourteenth
Amendment
issues
of
equal
protection
under
the
law.
This
is
a
law.
I
This
is
an
I,
don't
get
as
a
citizen,
the
ability
to
determine
what
laws
I
want
to
follow
and
what
laws
I
want
to
want
to
break
and
then,
when
I'm
called
out
on
it,
I
don't
get
the
ability
to
stand
there
and
explain
to
you.
While
the
guns
pointed
at
my
head
to
tell
you
and
explain
to
you
why
I'm
not
going
to
follow
the
law
or
why
you
got
to
kind
of
hold
on
and
come
arrest
me
later,
you
know
that
it
because
that's
what
we're
talking
about
equal
protection
under
the
law.
I
A
C
B
H
H
A
C
B
A
J
Newsworthy
that
actually,
it
is
newsworthy
that
over
the
next
probably
two
years,
the
library
will
issue
close
to
200,000
new
library
cards
to
our
students
in
San
Jose.
We
did
that
in
as
an
initiative,
part
of
the
education
and
digital
literacy
initiative
to
ensure
that
our
students,
when
they're
in
school,
have
a
library
card
issued
to
them
by
the
school,
and
that
was
made
possible
when
the
council
eliminated
late
fees
for
juvenile
materials
which,
as
a
shameless
plug,
you
will
see,
come
back
as
a
budget
request.
J
But
in
doing
so
we
followed
in
the
footsteps
of
LA
County
in
San
Francisco
and
several
other
peer
libraries
throughout
the
state
are
doing
similar
work.
The
nuance
in
San
Jose
is
that
we
work
with
21
school
districts
that
are
within
our
city
borders
and
it's
a
complicated
process
to
create
accounts
and
do
and
do
the
work
that
needs
to
be
done
to
ensure
that
barriers
are
really
removed.
J
D
J
So
we
discovered
we
have
two
new
school
or
not
two
new
school
districts,
but
we
have
schools
from
two
different
districts
in
San
Jose
that
were
not
previously
counted,
Fremont,
Unified
being
one
of
them,
I
believe
Fremont,
Unified,
being
one
of
them
and
the
other
being
Santa
Clara.
Is
they
each
have
schools
that
are
technically.
D
D
J
D
E
D
Yes,
amazing
to
me
anyway,
so
so
let
me
ask
you
this
I
I
tell
you
what
my
wife
is
a
school
teacher,
so
I
could
tell
you
that
there's
sometimes
a
lot
of
Direction
coming
down
from
the
state,
and
this
could
be
a
new
one.
Is
this
gonna?
Let
me
put
it
to
you
this
way.
Why
haven't
we
had
agreements
with
the
rest
of
the
thirteen
school
districts?
Sure.
J
And
so
we
have
not
received
any
negative
feedback
from
any
school
district.
The
the
SLO-
it's
not
even
really
slow,
it's
a
fairly
fast
progression,
but
the
Mater
progression
that
we're
moving
through
right
now
or
phased
approach
is
really
about
workload
for
the
districts
based
on
the
number
of
students.
They
have
their
process
for
rolling
those
cards
forward
and
also
us
phasing
our
own
workload,
because
we
we
can't
issue
two
hundred
thousand
cards
in
a
month
with
each.
J
Actually,
the
bill
speaks
to
one
of
the
efficiencies
that
could
be
created
right
now,
with
each
new
school
district
that
we
want
to
enter
into
an
agreement
with.
We
have
to
go
to
their
school
board
with
a
Memorandum
of
Understanding,
which
is
negotiated
with
every
single
school
district
in
our
City
Attorney's
Office.
So
it
is
a
little
bit
of
an
arduous
process.
The
bill,
if
successful,
could
clean
some
of
that
up,
but
to
the
underlying
point
of
why
we
haven't
moved
forward
with
all
districts
or
in
process
its.
D
J
Actually,
as
a
state
mandated
program,
the
state
will
be
required
to
contribute
to
defray
some
of
the
costs.
We're
working
on
our
estimates
right
now,
for
what
our
full
cost
is
for
running
these
programs
just
for
our
own
edification,
we're
not
sure
what
costs
the
state
will
ask
as
this
bill
gets
to
appropriations,
and
we
don't
yet
have
any
estimates
on
what
it
costs
the
school
districts
to
enter
into
these
agreements.
J
D
J
D
D
A
B
I
Also,
the
from
the
horseshoe
I'm
actually
disappointed
that
the
city
is
waiting
to
be
sued
before
they
produce
those
records.
I
mean
we
already
know.
What's
in
the
records,
there's
some
officers
that
are
not
worthy
of
that
badge.
You
know-
and
that's
not
that's
not
saying
that
you're
against
the
police
department
to
say
that,
but
they're
they're
just
not
worthy
of
wearing
it
and
we
as
a
citizenry,
are
being
exposed
to
them.
Just
like
a
virus
you're
not
protecting
us,
the
citizenry
from
that
virus
that
exists
in
the
police
department.
I
There's
paperwork
that
is
generated
that
would
inform
the
citizenry
Wiz's,
which
is
a
fundamental
principle
of
any
democracy.
Any
democracy
is
predicated
upon
the
ability
to
have
an
informed
citizenry.
An
extension
of
that
is
the
Bay
Area
News
Group.
They
are
the
ones
that
inform
the
citizenry
and
then
we
as
decision-makers
as
the
people
that
are
impacted
directly
by
your
policies.
I
Then
we
come
to
these
meetings
and
we
let
you
know
how
we
feel
about
that
and
because
you
derive
your
power
from
the
consent
of
the
governed
which
I
am
I'm,
giving
you
consent
and
we're
allowing
you
that
power.
That's
what
a
Republican
government
is
about
your
representatives,
and
so
we
bring
it
to
you
so
that
you
will
protect
us
and
I,
don't
feel
a
whole
lot
of
protection.
You
know,
they'll,
come
to
these
meetings
and
they'll
be
asking.
I
We
need
more
money,
we
need
more
officers,
we
need
more,
that
it
will
clean
house
dude,
clean
house,
I
got
personal
friends,
personal
childhood
friends
and
her
cops.
They
work
for
the
Sheriff's
Department,
they
work
for
the
police
department,
they
worked
in
the
Homicide,
Division
I
know
these
cops
and
these
are
good
cops.
They
really
care
about
their
job,
they
care
about
the
integrity
of
the
of
the
position
and
they
make
sure
that
they
serve
and
they
protect
which
they
are
sworn
to.