►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
B
As
you
know,
the
meetings
here
are
usually
just
streamed
on
Civic
Center
TV,
but
in
addition,
today's
meeting
and
the
future
meetings
of
this
committee
will
be
streamed
on
Facebook
as
part
of
a
pilot
project
that
we
are
doing
to
go
to
where
citizens
are
council
members
to
be
compliant
with
Brown
Act.
Please
do
not
view
the
Facebook
stream
or
its
comments
during
the
session.
B
You
can
only
view
that
the
comments
after
the
session
and
just
one
further
note
is
that
in
next
month's
meeting
we
will
do
will
do
a
demo
that
shows
the
Facebook
live
stream,
as
well
as
another
tool
that
we
are
beta
testing
with
box
called
box
skills
and
it's
a
artificial
intelligence,
video
search
function
that
will
make
it
much
easier
to
find
content
for
our
residents
on
city
council
committee
meetings.
Thank
you
and.
A
C
C
A
A
We
have
a
request
for
deferral
on
the
first
item,
which
is
the
request
to
defer
to
June
7th
the
digital
services
strategy.
So
can
I
get
him
something
it
moved
in.
Second,
it
all
in
favor
say
aye
all
right,
nothing
on
the
consent
calendar.
So
let's
go
to
our
first
report,
which
is
innovation
roadmap
and
get
this
gonna.
Kick
it
off
Thank.
D
You
mr.
chair
members
of
the
committee
members
of
the
public
key
Park,
NIST,
deputy
city
manager,
the
agenda
today
is,
is
really
all
about
what
it
takes
to
be
a
smart
city.
You'll
see
this
innovation
roadmap.
Update
will
also
have
a
discussion
later
of
the
emerging
Internet
of
Things
strategy,
describe
our
approach
to
privacy
and
have
a
chance
to
hear
directly
from
Facebook
about
the
Facebook
Terra
graft
project.
D
So
let
me
jump
right
into
our
innovation
roadmap
update
and,
as
you
recall,
these
are
the
22
items
that
have
been
prioritized
it's
about
a
a
year
old
back
in
January
2017
and
we've
organized
these
roughly
into
into
eight
product
lines
of
similar
projects,
and
then
the
shading
from
dark
to
light.
Er
is
a
prioritization,
essentially
going
from
non-negotiable
city
wide
to
emerging
projects
that
haven't
been
fully
prioritized.
As
a
reminder,
this
is
this
roadmap
will
be
evolving.
This
is
the
1.0.
D
We
want
to
see
a
full
smart
cities
roadmap,
not
just
an
innovation
roadmap,
as
our
2.0
and
I'll
talk
about
that
evolution
later,
but
for
the
rest
of
this
fiscal
year.
We
you
will
continue
to
see
the
existing
roadmap
and
its
variations,
so
when
we
last
left
our
innovation
heroes
back
in
February,
this
was
the
status
of
the
road
map.
It's
a
straight
forward
traffic
light
green
on
track,
yellow.
We
have
some
issues
red
seriously
at
risk
or
corrective
actions
needed.
D
We
had,
as
you
see,
a
couple
of
items,
red
some,
yellow
and
quite
a
bit
of
green
as
we
move
forward
to
today.
You
can
see
some
pretty
significant
shifts
and
you
can
see
immediately
that
we've
had
some
changes
and
issues
with
implementation.
One
project,
the
radar
sensor
module
strategy
has
improved
from
you
red
to
yellow,
as
we
are
working
collaboratively
with
our
startup
partner,
to
solve
some
data
validity
issues.
However,
the
rest
of
the
changes
since
February
been
downgrades
in
status.
D
I'm
gonna
focus
on
some
of
the
more
serious
ones
and
I'll
be
open
to
questions
later.
So
in
terms
of
some
of
the
read
status
items
the
LED
streetlight
/ne
compilot.
As
you
know,
we
terminated
the
any
compilot,
after
being
it
being
unable
to
reach
an
agreement
in
the
time
frame
that
was
desired.
So
that
item
is
read
and
will
eventually
be
pulled
off
of
the
road
map,
but
we
wanted
to
put
it
on
there
red
to
acknowledge
it.
D
The
LED
streetlights
we've
actually
have
as
yellow
we're
continuing
to
work
and,
in
fact,
are
increasing
our
work
on
strategies
for
the
LED
conversion,
including
possible
multiple
strategies
toward
that
and
we'll
return
to
counsel
in
the
form
of
an
info
memo
on
our
work
on
the
LED
streetlight
strategies
in
short
order.
But
that
has
not
stopped
in
fact
that
work
has
accelerated
access.
D
Eastside
is
downgraded
to
red,
while
we
successfully
launched
in
October
the
first
attendance
area,
we've
run
into
some
cost
issues
and
we
need
to
sit
down
with
our
partners
and
work
through
those
before
we
can
bring
them
back
to
you.
We're
confident
that
we
can
do
that,
but
we
wanted
to
red
light
that
to
be
again
candid
with
ourselves
on
that
citywide
data
architecture
remains
red,
though
there
is
potential
now
with
this
emerging
budget
that
we'll
be
able
to
address
some
of
those
red
issues
and
and
bring
that
up
on
the
traffic
light.
D
But
until
that
that
makes
the
pass-through,
it
remains
red
and
then
a
new
item
is
the
integrated
permitting
system.
This
is
a
pretty
significant
set
of
scheduling,
issues
that
are
in
place
right
now,
and
so
what
we're
doing
is
we
are
moving
forward
with
that,
with
a
health
check
on
our
approach,
we've
already
reset
our
approach
and
are
working
forward.
D
The
purpose
of
the
health
check
is
to
get
some
independent
validation
and
verification
to
make
sure
that
the
way
we're
moving
forward
just
doesn't
just
land
us
in
the
same
place
that
we
are
now
with
the
scheduled
delays.
This,
too,
is
an
item
where
we'll
also
come
to
you
with
more
detail
on
I,
both
in
the
ad
hoc
committee
and
through
an
info
memo,
but
I
wanted
to
be
true
to
the
rationale
of
our
innovation
roadmap
and
highlight
the
red
status
here
so
contextually.
D
If
you
kind
of
look
back
and
forth,
you
can
sort
of
good
news,
bad
news
about
the
innovation
roadmap
updates.
Bad
news
is,
as
you
can
see,
from
getting
a
little
bit
more
red
and
a
little
bit
more
yellow
an
innovation
is
hard
and
inflammation
implementation.
It's
scale
of
projects
like
updating
our
website,
converting
thousands
of
streetlights
or
updating
our
permanent
process.
C's
are
complicated
change
initiatives
that
require
improvements
not
only
in
technology,
but
also
processes
and
skilling
of
our
people.
D
This
update
suggests
we
still
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do
to
strengthen
our
core
muscle
and
capability
around
innovation.
The
good
news
for
me
is
that's
exactly
what
this
roadmap
was
intended
to
do
is
to
shine
an
honest
spotlight
on
what
our
strengths
and
weaknesses
are
and
catch
them
early.
A
number
of
these
projects
which
are
yellow,
are
red
in
the
normal
course
of
things.
I
think
would
have
gone
much
farther
before
we're
able
to
jump
in
and
begin
the
collaborative,
problem-solving
work
so
I'm
not
giving
us
a
pass
on
this
by
any
means.
D
There's
an
awful
lot
of
work
for
us
to
do,
and
we
need
to
get
back
on
track
toward
green,
but
I
am
appreciative
of
the
fact
that
this
agile
framework,
they
forced
reporting
out
to
you
on
a
regular
basis
in
a
consistent
pattern,
has
actually
been
helpful
for
us
to
manage
the
internal
items
very
quickly.
In
2018,
we
have
some
goals
on
this,
given
the
direction
from
you
will
be
evolving.
D
As
I
mentioned
this
innovation
roadmap
1.02
a
smart
cities,
roadmap,
2.0
that'll-
probably
mean
about
four
things
at
least
one
that
will
move
from
smaller
projects
to
larger
strategies,
each
of
which
might
have
a
collection
of
projects
underneath
them
and
we'll
be
shifting
some
of
the
business-as-usual
items
out
of
the
this
roadmap
and
into
the
IT
roadmap.
That
will
make
sure
that
we're
able
to
continue
to
monitor
them
and
make
sure
they
come
to
successful
completion,
but
we'll
keep
the
focus
of
the
smart
cities
roadmap
on
more
pure
innovation
and
new
approaches.
D
Third,
we'll
have
a
tighter
alignment
between
the
smart
city
vision
and
the
road
map,
clearly
linking
back
to
the
original
policy
language
and
focus
areas.
So,
as
you
can
see
the
connection
where
there
is
one
or
disconnect,
if
we've
gotten
one
and
then
the
last
is
we
expect
to
have
more
space
and
capacity
for
small-scale,
opportunistic
partnerships
and
demonstration
projects
like
the
one
that
the
mayor's
office
has
led
today
with
the
with
the
clerk
and
our
communications
folks
at
face
box
live
demo.
D
These
small
ones
are
things
that
we
should
be
able
to
do
multiples
of
and
right
now
we
are
often
our
own
worst
enemies
in
terms
of
creating
barriers
to
them.
So
as
we
evolve,
the
roadmap
will
both
create
more
space
for
that
invisibility
and,
hopefully
more
capacity.
Finally,
we
will
define
a
very
lightweight
process
for
graduating,
victories,
removing
deep
prioritized
projects
or
completed
work
and
adding
new
projects.
D
E
D
D
We
need
to
do
a
bit
better
job
of
engagement
with
some
of
the
key
partners,
including
not
coincidentally,
the
elected
officials,
so
we're
gonna
spend
a
little
bit
more
time
connecting
with
our
department
heads
we're
gonna,
be
putting
some
items
on
the
agenda
for
you
to
consider
and
for
you
to
engage
in
and
for
your
staffs
to,
engage
in
and
we're
also
taking
an
extra
bit
of
time
to
make
sure
that
we've
really
got
the
designs
right.
So
it's
it's
not
a
red
line.
D
D
E
I'll
get
back
with
you
on
that.
Thank
you,
I.
The
reason
I'm
asking
is
because,
as
you
know,
our
website
redesign
is
long,
long
overdue,
and
so,
if,
if
we
can
get
a
good
version
up
that,
maybe
isn't
perfect
and
stay
on
schedule,
I
think
I
would
vote
for
that,
because
I
hear
about
it
all
the
time
that
it's
so
hard
to
find
things,
so
even
in
maybe
a
little
bit
more
than
incremental,
but
even
if
we
could
get
partway
there
and
then
make
tweaks
after
the
fact
I
think
would
be
helpful.
E
F
D
To
your
point
about
the
iterative
approach,
that's
something
actually
that
we're
beginning
to
to
embrace
in
the
website
as
well.
That's
not
going
to
be
perfect
and
so
we're
not
trying
to
push
everything
out
perfectly,
but
we
do
want
to
make
sure
that
we
we're
not
having
people
do
rework
on
the
1.0,
so
you
will
see
the
iteration,
and
this
push
back
is
more
to
make
sure
that
that
first
pushed
back
pushed
through
is
in
line
with
where
we
want
to
go
from
a
design
standpoint
and
I'll.
D
Search
functionality
and
also
making
sure
that
many
of
the
things
which
are
frequently
and
commonly
asked
are
just
simply
right
there
and
visible
for
you
and
more
of
a
service
delivery
approach
than
a
department
by
Department
approach
and
you'll.
Hear
more
of
that
when
we
start
to
talk
about
the
digital
services
strategy.
Thank.
E
C
C
You
know
I've
heard
from
members
of
our
team
that
so
far
that
the
there
seems
to
be
a
really
substantial
upgrade
here
and
it
looks
pretty
good,
which
is
great
I
know
it's
always
a
big
question
about
whether
it's
too
soon
or
not,
to
to
launch
I'm
perfectly
happy
with
that.
Hey
the
site's
up,
but
it's
under
construction
in
these
parts
kind
of
thing.
If
that's,
what
we
need
to
do,
I
get
it
I
wondering.
Have
we
really
defined
clearly
what
the
top
search
requests
are
by
the
users
of
our
website?
D
But
as
we
move
toward
more
of
a
digital
services
strategy,
I
think
I
think
we're
going
to
find
a
lot
more
under
that
rug
to
be
to
be
cleaning
up.
For
example,
when
we
did
some
of
the
user
testing,
it
was
interesting
because
you
know
we
know
what
departments
things
are
in,
but
people
will
be
like.
Oh,
this
is
related
to
my
home,
so
I'm
going
to
housing
yeah.
G
C
Wonder
to
what
extent
do
we
want
to
upfront
admit
that
we're
gonna
be
a
portal
for
everything
in
San
Jose
or
are
we
gonna
just
say
yeah?
How
it
is?
We
really
ensure
that
people
are
going
to
the
right
agency
for
that
what
they
need,
I
know,
I'm
sure,
that's
something
you're
grappling
with,
but
you
know,
even
if
folks
are
looking
for
the
best
places
to
catch
pokemon
in
the
city.
If
we
had
a
website
word,
they
knew
they
went
to
our
portal
for
that
that
would
be
cool
I'm,
not
done.
C
D
A
C
D
I
think
and
again,
some
of
the
things
on
my
San
Jose
are
right.
There
right,
I,
don't
care
whether
a
streetlight
is
a
county
street
light
or
a
city
street
light,
even
if
it's
in
front
of
my
street
I
want
it
reported.
So
how
do
we?
How
do
we
get
those
requests
over
to
the
right
jurisdiction
and
how
do
we
communicate
back
to
the
user
in
a
way
that
isn't
just
dropping
them
into
a
black
hole?
Yeah.
D
C
D
D
Do
we
need
to
make
and
so
I
expect
kind
of
two
two
levels
of
communication:
one
is
within
the
next
month
kind
of
giving
an
update
on
where
we
are
and
then,
after
that,
really
digging
deep
on
the
on
the
basis
of
the
help
check-in
in
hopefully
saying
yes,
we're
on
the
right
track
or
if
not
flagging
what
we
need
to
do
differently.
Okay,.
C
D
Are
connected
and
some
are
not
there
are.
We
are
continuing
with
process
improvements
which
are
not
dependent
on
the
functionality
of
the
new
system
and
then
we're
also
keeping
an
eye
on
what
processes
we
can
improve
once
we
have
the
new
system
so
they're
going
on
parallel
tracks,
but
they're
talking
to
each
other.
At
this
point,
okay,.
C
H
D
I
got
it
right
and
so
there's
some
a
renewed
interest
on
the
possibility
of
collaborating
with
us
and
so
we'll
we're
gonna.
Have
it
sometime,
I
think
we've
just
scheduled
that
actually,
in
the
last
sprint
the
meeting
to
sit
down
and
meet
with
them
understand
what
their
appetite
is
and
interest
and
see
if
there's
some
opportunity
to
turn
that
from
gray
and
turn
the
lights
back
on
on
that,
okay,.
C
D
Some
are
sketchier
and
some
are
really
solid,
so
it
and
that's
part
of
the
part
of
what
we
realized.
As
these
things
are
a
little
bit
a
lot
of
different
levels,
yeah
and
so
part
of
what
we
want
to
do
in
the
next.
Iteration
is
kind
of
have
them
more
at
the
same
level
and
then
have
a
clear,
a
clear
understanding
of
timelines
for
each
of
them.
That.
H
C
D
And
also,
if
we
think,
if
we
can
use
the
roadmap
to
clarify
what
midterm
deliverables
are
what
kind
of
minimal
viable
products
we
could
get
out
there,
we
think
that
that'll
be
useful
to
us,
because
we
do
tend
to
kind
of
hold
it
all
in
and
tell
us.
We
think
it's
perfect
and
let
it
out,
and
maybe
especially
with
innovation.
We
should
be
more
open
to
letting
things
out
into
the
world
sooner,
but
where
our
hope
is
that,
as
you
see,
the
2.0
map
will
have
a
more
consistency
and
clarity
on
schedule
appreciate
it.
A
Just
have
a
quick
question
and
we're
gonna
be
going
over
the
privacy
policy
engagement,
and
you
might
have
told
us
this
in
a
prior
committee
meeting,
but
it's
something
you're
older
now
my
memory
is
not
what
it
used
to
be.
So
can
you
help
me
understand
why
we
don't
have
prepped
out
privacy
policy
specifically
identified
as
one
of
the
items
in
the
innovation
roadmap.
D
Can
certainly
do
that.
It
was
a
subset
of
our
work
originally
around
some
of
the
IOT
and
the
in
e-comm,
and
we
and
also
the
Digital
Inclusion,
so
it
would.
It
probably
makes
sense
to
break
that
out
as
a
separate
thing
and
track
that,
along
with
it
I.
So
I
think
that's
a
if
I'll
take
that
as
a
suggestion,
I
think
that's
good
feedback.
Okay,.
I
I
had
actually
been
wondering
from
about
the
any
comp
thing
for
a
while
and
I
know.
You
just
said
that
you
know,
for
whatever
reason
it
didn't
fall
through
like
we
thought
it
would,
but
just
I
don't
know
if
I
missed
it
or
if
it
did.
This
is
actually
the
first
time
that
I
actually
heard
that
officially
through
channels.
So
I
don't
know.
If
there
are
other
council
members
who
might
be
wondering
about
that
too
and
the
public
who
follows
a
house
of
meetings,
we
don't
follow
every
single
committee
I,
don't.
I
D
We
sent
out
an
info
memo
in
February
that
okay
delineated
that,
and
so
it
was
a
just
a
one
pager.
It
may
have
gone
under
folks
radar
bottom
line
was
you
know
we,
we
came
very
rapidly
to
a
conceptual
agreement,
but
then
over
seven
months
of
negotiation
didn't
get
to
a
point
where
we
had
inked
on
on
the
paper
in
the
way,
and
at
that
point
we
no
longer
felt
comfortable
with
moving
forward
and
pivoted.
I
D
A
G
Hopeful
the
LED
streetlight
program
was
once
green.
It's
now
yellow
and
I
find
that
interesting
I
understand
that
you're
gonna
be
taking
a
12-month
process
to
look
into
a
privacy
policy
structure
for
things
like
LED
streetlights
and
councilperson
Jones.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
suggestion
and
it's
you
know
for
myself.
That's
just
a
miraculous
change
of
events
to
include
a
privacy
policy
within
that
innovation,
roadmap.
I
think
it
would
just
it
can
just
help
things
out
immensely
and
mate
and
make
things
clearer
and
and
and
make
a
what
we're
all
trying
to
work
towards.
G
D
A
Our
work
on
developing
the
first-ever
citywide
Internet
of
Things
strategy
about
six
months
back
and
since
then
we
have
put
significant
part
into
developing
a
robust
ready
to
address,
or
the
city
should
approach
the
upcoming
wave
of
IOT.
The
city
has
collaborated
with
PricewaterhouseCoopers
for
this
engagement.
A
A
Ready
we
are-
and
we
did
this
through
interviews
and
workshops
in
parallel,
we
also
launched
a
track
to
do
some
PSAT
research
and
did
a
benchmarking
exercise.
Finally,
we
took
the
design
inputs
from
our
department
heads
to
a
series
of
workshops
as
well
the
synthesis
of
these
inputs
and
our
own
analysis.
We
have
developed
the
San
Jose
IOT,
guiding
principles,
IOT
foundational
building
blocks
and
our
overarching
IOT
strategy.
That
is
both
benefits,
driven
and
people
centric.
J
A
J
Graphics,
I'll
try
to
make
it
as
intelligible
as
possible,
so
we
won't
have
to
read
all
the
fine
print,
but
this
is
a
topic
that
is
both
complex
and
multivalent,
and
we've
worked
to
make
it
feasible
for
the
city.
So
just
to
start
I
mean
when,
in
terms
of
IOT
what
is
IOT
it's
the
Internet
of
Things.
What
is
the
Internet
of
Things?
J
It
is
literally
things
being
mechanised
devices
speaking
to
each
other
over
the
Internet,
so
it's
sensors
actuators,
sending
data
that
they're
perceiving
from
the
environment,
processing
it
and
then
potentially
sending
it
back
to
other
machines
to
change
things.
I
mean
there's
lots
of
technical
definitions.
Engineers
have
other
ones
that
can
be
even
longer
and
sort
of
less
less
precise
or
less
helpful,
but
ultimately
we're
talking
about
machines
talking
to
machines
over
the
internet
and
what
the?
J
What
can
that
be
used
for
in
the
city
context,
so
oftentimes
when
we
start
to
look
at
I/o
t
in
a
city
context,
there's
already
a
lot
that's
happening.
This
is
not
something
that
we
need
to
prepare
for
because
we've
never
done
it
before.
Where
are
doing
it.
We've
got
a
lot
of
IOT
applications
that
are
currently
in
the
city
and
succeeding
whether
it's
street
light
dimmers
that
are
aware
that
that
Sun,
that
something
is
happening
or
the
Sun
is
setting
whether
it's
the
ability
to
nope
sewage
overflows.
J
We
already
have
this
capability,
but
you're
gonna.
Imagine
to
see
more
and
more
and
more
of
this,
and
so
our
challenge
is
really
twofold:
the
first:
how
can
we
prepare
for
more
and
more
and
more
while
still
succeeding,
and
also,
how
can
we
make
it
so
that
we
are
able
to
process
this
effectively
so
that
we
don't
get
overwhelmed
by
the
management
of
more
and
more.
J
We've
really
got
a
lot
of
individual
solutions,
we're
looking
to
be
able
to
manage
them
all
collectively
and
successfully
so
I'm
gonna
flip
from
here.
This
is
really
the
sort
of
the
kind
of
IOT
that
you'll
see
that
you're,
aware
of
that,
you
can
touch,
but
that
really
behind
the
scenes,
there's
a
skeleton.
So
you
know,
if
you
see
the
sensor,
if
you
see
the
sensor
in
the
street,
if
you
see
the
street
light
change,
what
does
it?
What
does
it
take
to
make
that
success
to
make
that
work?
J
And
so
for
that
we
really
see
two
big
pieces,
there's
the
pure
technology,
and
then
there
are
the
policies
and
support
functions
to
make
it
a
success.
And
so
that's
really
one
of
the
central
challenges
of
IOT
is
making
sure
that
you
that
your
technology
works
and
it's
up-to-date
and
that
your
policies
are
supporting
it
and
delivering
the
best
outcomes
for
residents
and
so
from
a
pure
technology
perspective
I
mean
the
IOT.
Is
we
just
said
there
are
sensors
out
in
the
world
they're
sensing
things
they're,
sending
information
over
the
Internet.
J
J
So
that's
the
technology
stack
you'll,
see
it
whether
it's
a
you
know
a
flood
sensor
prioritization
for
ambulances,
whatever
it's
got
to
go
through
some
series
of
steps
like
that
and
wrapping
around
that
are
these
big
important
concepts
to
make
sure
the
city
can
succeed,
both
cybersecurity,
making
sure
that
nobody
is
getting
into
those
devices
who
shouldn't
be
there.
Digital
privacy
making
sure
that
what
those
devices
are
gathering
is
appropriate
is
appropriately
managed
we're
seeing
that
in
the
news,
a
lot
additionally
from
a
city
perspective,
funding
who
is
paying
for
this?
J
So,
to
summarize
that
really
the
city
is
already
doing
IOT,
we
have
opportunities
to
do
more
of
it,
both
in
terms
of
hardware.
That's
already
there
and
new
applications.
We
could
be
doing
it
better.
One
thing
you're
going
to
hear
me
go
into
a
little
bit
after
this
is
this
concept
that
IOT
is
immature
everywhere.
J
J
Excellent
look
looking
for
looking
forward
to
it,
so
you
know
so
what
what
we're
seeing
here
is
really
a
few
things.
We've
talked
about
making
lives
better
and
that
that's
that
involves
efficiency.
It
involves
cost
savings,
involves
being
able
to
do
city
services
more
effectively.
A
couple
of
examples
you
see
are
these
trash
cans.
You
know
some
obviously
perhaps
more
successful
than
others,
but
that
they're
able
to
it
by
sending
information,
save
save
emissions.
J
Save
resources
only
be
picked
up
when
they
need
to
be
similarly
another
emerging
idea
is
this
concept
of
predictive
maintenance
that
solving
a
problem,
particularly
a
road
problem
before
it
happens,
would
both
save
money
and
reduce
congestion,
and
so
how
can
we
use
sensors
and
data
and
analytics
to
get
ahead
of
that?
So
these
are
the
kind
of
things
you
know.
This
is
the
sort
of
prize.
That's
out
there.
J
So
in
terms
of
how
we
compare
your
gonna
see,
you
know
we
look,
we
looked
at
a
lot
of
really
leading
cities.
You're
gonna
see
them
all
come
up
here.
We
looked
at
them
in
terms
of
Technology.
What
sort
of
stuff
do
they
have
out
in
the
streets
and
how
advanced
is
it?
How
much
of
it
do
they
have?
We
also
looked
at
it
in
terms
of
governance.
How
do
they
take
care
of
that?
What
is
that?
What
are
that?
J
What's
that
wrapper
around
the
technology
stack
and
so
you'll
see
a
whole
bunch
of
cities
there
and
they're
they're
moving
through
you
know
with
some
more
mature
than
others,
but,
as
we
said,
really
nobody's
got
this
exactly
right.
You'll
see,
particularly
the
most
advanced
cities
tend
to
be
emerging,
Asian
economies
who
have
more
central
control,
and
so
that
you
know
they're
going
to
be
able
to
move
quickly
in
a
way
that
maybe
we
wouldn't
San
Jose
I.
J
Don't
want
this
to
alarm,
you
we're
actually
doing
quite
well
and
we
have
a
lot
going
on
in
terms
of
success.
I
mean
there
are
a
lot
of
things
we
do
very
well,
but
that
we
do
see.
We
have
the
opportunity
against
some
of
the
leaders
to
continue
to
involve
both
that
technology
stack.
What
we
have
there
as
well
as
how
we
look
at
it.
J
So
one
of
the
things
that
we
looked
through
was
this
concept
of
principles
as
we
get
started
of
trying
to
organize
ourselves
on
IOT
and
going
on
this
journey.
What
what
is
the
core
of
what?
What
we
should?
What
are
our
North
Stars?
How
do
we
make
sure
that
each
application,
each
consideration
each
step,
is
moving
us
in
the
right
direction?
So
we
worked
through
a
series
of
stakeholders,
discussions
research
to
come
towards
these
guiding
principles
for
our
IOT
and
that
you
can.
J
There
are
a
number
of
them:
I,
don't
read
each
one
of
them,
but
that
at
their
core
they're
about
making
sure
that
the
city
is
safe.
The
city
is
successful,
that
we're
continuing
on
a
journey
and
we're
improving
services,
protecting
people
all
continuing
to
innovate
and
move
along.
We
don't
want
to
be
so
conservative
that
that
no
progress
is
made,
but
the
same
time
making
sure
that
we're
keeping
people
at
the
center.
J
One
of
the
other
places
within
IOT
that
you
might
look
as
some,
so
why
do
we
need
to
focus
on
this?
What
does
it
do
for
us
and
ultimately,
what
it
is
IOT
can
be
an
enabler
of
city
services
and
of
the
Smart
City
vision,
collective
way
that
the
Smart
City
vision
is
a
view
towards
what
what
the
city
can
be
and
what
it
should
be.
That
IOT
can
be
one
of
the
things
that
helps
us
get
there.
J
It
can
deliver
improved
efficiency,
as
we
talked
about
it,
can
deliver
the
kinds
of
great
resident
services
that
they
would
expect
was
so
that
they
can
have
more
information
and
more
real-time
data.
It
can
help
us
respond
more
quickly
to
emergencies,
that
these
are
the
kind
of
things
that
IOT
can
do
for
us.
If
we,
if
we
allow
it
to
succeed,.
J
So
one
of
the
we've
looked
at
this
we've
now
looked
across
sort
of
what
is
IOT.
What
is
the
technology?
What
can
it
do
for
us?
Where
are
some
of
the
value
that
we
can
get
elsewhere
and
we're
gonna
look
at
it?
Now
is
some
questions
of.
Why
do
we
need
to
tackle
this
now?
City
has
a
number
of
priorities,
and
one
of
the
first
ones
is
that
technology
is
at
a
tipping
point
right
now
we
see
there
you're,
seeing
this
hockey
stick
graph.
J
This
is
going
to
be
the
year
in
which
I
ot
devices
surpass
mobile
devices
you're
just
going
to
see
more
and
more
and
more
of
this
more
and
more
devices
more
and
more
data.
You
know
the
you'll
see
more
in
the
environment,
and
so
the
city
needs
to
be
preparing
for
is
how
to
process
that.
How
can
we
get
ready
not
just
to
have
the
applications
we
have
today,
but
for
a
flood
of
applications
in
the
future?
What
are
the
processes?
J
What
are
the
data
forms
so
that
we
can
manage
that
wave
and
ride
that
wave?
Ultimately,
you
know
we.
If
we
tackle
this
now,
we
see
there
there's
some
value
to
be
had
particularly
around
cost
savings
that
some
specific
applications
may
be
able
to
support
some
of
the
some
of
the
budget
issues
in
place.
The
community
is
becoming
increasingly
interested
in
this,
particularly
around
privacy
and
the
privacy
around
IOT.
So
we
want
to
be.
We
feel
it
as
an
opportunity
to
be
responsive
there
and
ultimately,
as
the
capital
Silicon
Valley.
J
So
we're
going
to
pivot
from
here
is
is
start
looking
into
what
are
some
of
the
strategy
recommendations
on?
How
do
we
think
we
should
tackle
this?
We
really
looked
at
the
fact
that
there's
lots
of
technology
out
there
there's
really
that
skeleton
we
need
to
build
behind
it
and
that
if
we
get
that
skeleton
right
and
we
get
it
right
now,
we
can
prepare
to
gather
a
lot
of
the
benefits
that
we've
seen.
J
So
one
of
the
ways
we
went
around
this
was
doing
a
number
of
deep
technical
workshops
with
individual
departments
looking
at
external
experts
cities
to
say.
So.
What
are
the
big
challenges
with
IOT
when
we
think
out
into
the
future
when
we
imagine
there
being
all
of
those
new
devices?
What
are
some
of
the
big
challenges
and
how
can
we
make
sure
to
address
them
successfully?
Sort
of
looking
down
the
left
side
you'll
see
so
one
of
the
big
ones.
Is
this
question
of
data
fragmentation?
J
If
we
just
put
up
individual
solutions,
individual
devices
that
work
on
completely
separate
systems
will
be
overwhelmed
by
trying
to
manage
them
and
they'll
never
be
able
to
speak
to
each
other
to
get
the
kind
of
value
from
that
data.
That's
possible
to
be
able
to
unlock
those
new
services
and
improvements.
Digital
privacy
and
cyber
security
are
I,
mean
they're
they're,
almost
doing
there
they're
so
prominent
in
the
news,
so
prominent
in
considerations
you'll
see
that
you've
seen
some
other
cities
have
those
challenges
very
recently.
J
You
know
these
are
things
that
we
really
as
we
go
forward.
We
need,
we
feel
they
need
to
be
locked
down.
Also,
this
question
of
what
do
we
do
with
the
fact
that
the
applications
are
not
yet
mature?
A
lot
of
IOT
is
still
emerging,
you're,
getting
new
ideas
everyone's.
There
are
many
companies
providing
new
new
solutions
that
may
be
unproven.
How
do
we
navigate
in
a
world
where
not
all
the
technology
is
mature,
but
again
we
want
to
be
capturing
that
value
and
staying
a
leading
position.
J
So
in
terms
of
design
considerations,
we
see
there.
You
know
we
can
address
these
that
there's
the
opportunity
to
organize
ourselves
around
a
data
strategy
so
that
we're
process
that
data
effectively.
This
is
something
I
believe
has
been
spoken
to
with
this
committee
earlier,
making
sure
that
there's
a
united
front
and-
or
you
know,
repeatable
principles
in
terms
of
cyber
see
both
cyber
security
and
privacy.
J
As
we
start
looking
at
how
to
be
able
to
gather
that
data
and
integrate
it,
there's
an
opportunity
to
to
look
at
some
sort
of
software
platform
to
make
sure
that
we're
able
to
gather
all
the
data
and
put
it
in
one
place
and
then
from
that
solid
base,
we'd
be
able
to
experiment
with
the
individual
use
cases
to
be
able
to
look
at
whether
we
would
want
to
do
something
around
floods
around
traffic.
Around
cost
savings
we
were
able
to
be,
can
then
experiment
from
a
say,
solid
base.
J
And
again,
looking
back
at
that
technology
stack,
we've
got
the
entire
flow
that
we
need
to
work
through
and
the
for
real
areas.
We
see
there
needing
to
focus,
as
we
said,
you
saw
them
right
off
the
last
slide,
a
cybersecurity
we
feel
like.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
technology
stack
is
secure.
If
it's
not,
we
put
ourselves
at
risk,
we
put
our
progress
at
risk.
J
We
put
the
prot
the
trust
of
the
residents
at
risk,
similarly
with
privacy,
we
feel
like,
in
order
for
this,
to
thrive,
going
forward,
as
we
see
more
and
more
of
these
applications
and
want
to
make
sure
that
our
digital
privacy
is
being
managed
in
a
way
that
we
are
comfortable
with
and
is
repeatable
and
consistent
across
the
city.
A
third
thing
that
we
see
as
being
an
important
foundation
before
we
begin
the
experiment
with
use
cases.
J
J
Similarly,
that
we've
got
some
kind
of
software
to
make
sure
that
data
is
all
coming
into
the
city
cleanly
and
can
be
spoken
to
in
an
orderly
way.
There's
been.
This
is
an
emerging
area
around
software,
but
we
think
there's
opportunity
here.
So
if
we
put
these
building
blocks
in
place,
that
would
give
the
kind
of
solid
foundation
that
then
would
allow
for
the
leadership
and
use
case
experimentation.
J
So,
in
terms
of
the
strategy
itself,
if
we
had
to
had
to
summarize
it
all
in
one
place,
what
we
see
is
being
what
would
be
a
leading
position.
What
would
allow
the
city
to
move
forward
and
meet
its
own
ambition
would
be
first
getting
those
six
rice
that
data
strategy,
the
software
platform,
digital
privacy
and
cybersecurity,
making
sure
that
we
can
build
on
those
that
there
in
place
and
that
we
as
we
go
forward.
J
That's
when
we
are
able
to
innovate,
pilot
succeed,
deliver
value,
you'll,
see
some
of
these
areas
here:
public
safety,
mobility,
cost
savings
and
facility
management,
environment,
water
savings,
making
sure
that
we're
only
watering
when
we
really
need
to
be
that
these
are.
These
are
the
applications
that
we
want.
J
These
the
applications
we
can
see-
and
these
are
those
applications
you
saw
back
on
that
first
slide
out
in
the
street,
but
that
when
so
now,
once
we
have
the
solid
foundation,
we
can
be
as
ambitious
as
we
want
to
be
here
and,
ultimately
that
allows
us
to
deliver
those
benefits
to
residents,
to
make
them
safer,
to
make
the
city
more
efficient
and
more
effective,
deliver
those
sir
same
services
better
and
as
well
as
innovate,
deliver
new
services
and
more
delightful
services.
So
we
had
to
add
it
all
up
how
to
take
on
IOT.
J
This
would
really
be
it
build
a
solid
base
make
sure
that
we're
using
people
as
well
as
we
can
and
that
they're
comfortable
and
then
deliver
services
on
top
of
that
in
terms
of
how
to
go
forward
from
there.
Well,
you
know
we
see
there
there
a
sort
of
a
series
of
opportunities.
You
know
how
we
might
how
we
might
tackle
this
in
terms
of
IOT
strategy
and,
if
we're
talking
about
public
safety,
maybe
that's
our
streetlights
that
allows
us
to.
You
know,
keep
people
safer
that
allows
us
to
reduce
reduce
issues.
J
Similarly,
with
congestion,
if
we're
using
traffic
counters,
we
can
figure
out
where
individuals
are
going
sequence,
lights,
deliver
services
to
make
sure
that
we're
flowing
smoothly
and
safely
from
a
sillies
management
perspective,
we're
making
sure
that
we're
watching
our
assets
watching
our
energy
so
that
we
can
then
deliver
improved
facility
services
and,
finally,
from
an
environment.
You
know
those
those
waste
bins
may
allow
us
to
deliver
improved
recycling
volumes.
Ultimately,
the
point
here
is
to
say
that
the
point
of
IOT
is
not
to
put
devices
out
but
to
deliver
better
outcomes.
J
J
How
do
we
move
forward
from
here?
How
do
we?
How
do
we
get
going
on
this
strategy
that
we
put
forward?
So
there's
really
two
phases
that
we
see?
The
first
is
we're
going
to
need
a
little
bit
of
stand-up
to
get
those
things
in
place.
Those
building
blocks
that
we
talked
about
and
from
a
lot
of
that's
already
in
place.
We
believe
it
can
be
done
using
existing
staff
and
existing
budgets
to
make
sure
that
we're
putting
some
of
those
building
blocks
in
place
in
the
first
year
or
two.
J
Ultimately,
beyond
that,
once
that
foundation
is
in
place.
What
we
again,
we
want
to
be
innovating
delivering
use
cases
partnering
with
in
other
departments
to
make
sure
that
that
they're,
finding
the
kind
of
customized
benefits
delivering
solutions
that
we
come,
that
we
see
IOT
is
being
able
to
deliver,
and
we
don't
think
that
needs
to
wait
until
your
two
to
get
started.
They
that
we've
we've
broken
these
up,
because
they're
two
different
tracks
of
work,
but
not
because
that
one
of
them
can't
start
until
the
other
is
in
place.
D
Alright,
so
for
me,
in
closing
this
is
this
is
her
the
one-page
summary
of
where
we
think
we
should
be
headed
and
well
opened
up
in
just
a
moment
for
your
perspective,
discussion
and
feedback,
the
heart
of
everything
we
do
is
ain't.
It
aim
to
provide
benefits
for
our
residents
for
our
businesses
and
for
our
visitors.
We
really
do
think
that
getting
the
basics
right
on
these
four
building
blocks
is
crucial
in
addition
to
them
being
building
blocks.
We
feel
that
these
are
probably
the
most
centralized
part
of
what
we'll
do
in
IOT.
D
D
We
do
see
us
prioritizing
use
cases
which
are
very
important
to
the
city
and
also
where
we
think
that
the
still
emerging
technology
is
probably
more
mature
places
like
traffic
management
places
around
the
street.
Smart
lighting
control
things
like
irrigation,
control
and
and
building
energy
systems
are
all
mature
and
are
all
good
bets
for
us
in
terms
of
our
city's
investment
and
then
again
back
up
at
the
top
is.
D
Is
we
really
want
to
make
sure
that,
as
we're
doing
this
safely,
the
end
result
is
more
effective
and
more
efficient
services
being
delivered
to
our
residents
or
businesses
and
our
visitors
and
in
some
cases,
completely
new
services
that
we
hadn't
conceived
up
or
couldn't
do
without
the
benefit
of
this
extra
data
layer?
So
let
me
stop
right
here
and
and
give
you
the
chance
to
weigh
in
on
where
we
are
where
we
aren't
with
this,
so
that
we
can
do
the
next
iteration
of
the
strategy
development,
with
your
feedback
and
direction
in
mind.
E
For
me,
I,
like
the
graphics,
you
guys
know
that
the
the
first
question
I
have
is
I
appreciate
wanting
to
get
the
basics
right,
but
a
couple
of
slides
back,
you
talked
about
how
delivering
better
outcomes
is
the
whole
purpose
of
doing
this,
but
we
haven't
had
a
discussion
yet
about
what
are
the
outcomes
that
we
want
to
deliver
better
using
technology,
and
it
seems
to
me
like
getting
the
basics
right.
Isn't
the
first
step,
it's
figuring
out
where
we
want
to
be.
E
That
is
the
first
step,
but
I'm
a
little
bit
confused
about
number
getting
the
basics
right
and
then
engaging
stakeholders
when
I
think
that
engaging
stakeholders
should
be
before
or
concurrent
with
getting
the
basics
right,
because
we
need
to
talk
about
what
what
are
the
pain
points?
What
are
the
outcomes
that
we
want
to
improve
on
and
to
Kip's
point
about
the
the
parks
using
the
the
water
sprinklers
or
the
sensors
they're?
Already
doing
that,
there's
they're
already
starting
to
do
that.
E
D
Point
and
we
actually
kind
of
debated
back
and
forth
on
just
this
aspect
of
the
graphic,
because
it
these
are.
These
aren't
a
one,
two
three
I'm
going
to
do,
one
that
I'm
going
to
do
two
then
I'm
going
to
do
three.
These
are
one
two
three
that
we
do
together,
because
we
really
can't.
We
don't
want
to
make
a
cyber
security
policy
and
abstract
of
the
understanding
of
the
actual
technology
and
the
actual
hardware.
D
We
certainly
don't
want
to
launch
on
a
case
study
without
actually
engaging
with
the
department's
on
what
are
their
pain
points
so
I
think
the
irrigation
is
a
good
example.
You
know
with
in
conversations
with
angel
and
some
others
today
about
that
we're
having
a
huddle
kind
of
cross
departmental
II,
so
that
will
let
them
continue
to
lead
in
that,
but
we're
gonna
wrap
around
some
support
support
for
them
so
that
they
are
informing
the
way
we
do
of
the
global
cybersecurity
and
the
platform
work,
but
you're
right.
D
E
No,
it's
it's
finite.
I
understand
how
difficult
it
is
so
I
mean
this
is
really
high
level
conceptual
stuff
and
it
the
the
graphics,
do,
help
me
process
it.
Although
I
will
say
it
takes
me
some
time
so,
I
always
feel
like
I'm,
two
slides
behind
you
and
I
have
to
have
the
slides
up
on
my
on
my
iPad
kind
of
took
to
process
the
information.
So
I
I
I
appreciate
that
these
things
are
happening.
Concurrently.
I
would
like
to
have
more.
D
That's
really
rich
part
of
what
we're
doing
right
now
is.
We
are
identifying
and
vetting
different
use
cases
and
so
I
think
if
I'm,
following
your
request,
correctly
I
think
would
be
useful
to
bring
and
make
transparent
some
of
that
work
and
also
give
you
the
opportunity
to
weigh
in
on
the
correct
evaluation
criteria
and
the
direction
on
that
again.
D
We're
hoping
that
eventually,
we'll
think
of
IOT
the
way
we
think
of
electricity
it'll
just
be
what
you,
what
you
do
and
what
you
put
in
buildings
and
infrastructure,
so
I
think
it'll
be
particularly
helpful
as
we
sort
through
these
first
use
cases
to
get
your
feedback
on
if
we're
headed
in
the
right
direction,
so
we'll
bring
that
work
back
sooner
rather
than
later.
Perhaps
when
we
bring
the
strategy
back
in
the
fall
and
say
here's
our
first
cut,
we
looked
at
37
use
cases.
These
were
our
criteria.
This
is
where
we
are.
D
E
And
to
your
point
about
about
the
use
cases,
I
would
even
go
one
kind
of
one
step
back
from
that
about
what
are
the
expected
outcomes
or
what
are
the
desired
outcomes
that
you're
hearing
from
departments
and
and
where
can
technology
help
improve
those
outcomes
and
where
can
where
is
the
technology
not
there
yet
or
or
it's
not
a?
It
ends
up
not
being
a
technological
issue.
E
C
D
Been
in
conversations
with
some
global
partners
who
are
making
attempts
at
putting
together
a
platform
approach,
one
of
our
thoughts
is
that
if
these
conversations
come
together,
we
will
pilot
one
of
these
platforms
and
see
how
it
works
out.
This
is
it.
There
is
a
bit
of
a
Holy
Grail
quality
to
this
at
the
moment,
because
whoever
does
this
well
is
going
to
is
going
to
capture
a
lot
of
value,
so
nobody
has
got
something
out
there.
D
That's
perfect,
but
we're
in
conversation
with
with
a
some
folks
and
if
that
come
that
conversation
goes
further,
will
bring
together
a
pilot
partnership
and
and
run
them
through
the
paces
to
see
if
this
works
and
if
it
doesn't,
it
will
inform
then
where
we
go
out
with
for
solicitations
for
another
pilot.
If
it
does
work,
it
may
be
put
in
song
path
for
a
longer-term
partnership.
Okay,.
E
And
that's
really
useful
and
just
kind
of
a
thought
that
came
up
while
you
were
talking
about
that.
Kip
is
I.
Just
came
from
Caltrain
meeting
from
this
morning
and
I
know
that
we
we
had
to
do
positive,
train
control
and
the
technology
when
we
originally
or
when
they
before
I
was
on
the
board
five
years
ago.
Had
the
RFPs
the
technology
has
evolved
and
we
had,
to
you
know,
terminate
a
contract
with
our
original
supplier
and
and
luckily,
thankfully,
the
second,
the
second
proposal
from
five
years
ago.
E
Their
technology
had
advanced
to
a
place
where
it
was
actually
now
acceptable
to
us,
and
it
wasn't
back
then
five
years
ago,
and
so
we
were
constrained
at
that
time
and
now
there's
a
way
to
terminate
the
current
contract
for
other
reasons.
But
now
there's
kind
of
some
of
these
changeover
costs
that
we
have
to
incur
incur
to
get
a
better,
a
better
technology
or
a
better
solution
and
I
guess
I'm.
E
Just
kind
of
talking
out
loud
that
I'm
one
of
the
risks
about
us
trying
to
be
on
the
forefront
of
this,
is
that
we'll
have
those
kind
of
change
over
cost
that
we
have
to
incur
incur
because
we're
not
waiting
for
the
technology
to
mature
and
then
how
do
we
build
that
into
our
systems
and
our
budgets?
You're.
D
Absolutely
correct,
you
know,
there's
this
concept
of
path.
Dependence
didn't
see
right
that
you'll
you'll
pick
something,
and
that
kind
of
sets
the
course
for
for
a
lot
of
other
things.
And
if
you
pick
wrong,
that
can
be
a
substantial
rip
out
and
rework
that's
a
very
real
risk
in
any
emerging
technology
or
any
emerging
market.
As
somebody
who
had
a
Palm
Pilot
and
thought
they
were
really
cool
right,
I
had.
E
D
E
D
That's
fine,
if
you're
an
individual,
you
just
get
the
next
thing
up,
but
if
we
got
in
fifty
thousand,
you
know
are
six
thousand
city
employees,
Palm
Pilots,
and
then
they
were
obsolete.
We'd
be
in
that
that
situation.
So
there
is
very
much
this
risk
with
that
and
that's
again
part
of
part
of
what
we
realize
is.
D
So
part
of
what
we're
trying
to
evaluate
with
the
help
of
PwC
and
others
is
where
are
those
areas
where
the
technology
is
mature
enough
that
it's
a
sound
bet
and
going
there
and
then,
where
it
isn't
being
clear
that
we're
in
an
innovation
space
and
not
necessarily
laying
down
tracks
for
everything
everywhere
until
we
have
a
sense
of
where
that
path
dependency
will
lead.
But
there's
gonna
be
some
of
that
and
you've
put
your
finger
on
one.
What
is
one
of
the
biggest
risks
within
from
my
opinion,
within
the
IOT
space?
D
E
Thank
you
and
so
being
really
clear
about
that.
When
we're
talking
about
what
we
deploy
each
time
we
talk
about,
what
we
deploy
would
be
really
helpful
and
what
the
risk
is
in
having
to
incur
those
those
changeover
costs
or
what
the
what
the
constraints
might
be.
If
we,
you
know,
choose
now
versus
waiting
right.
D
Know
or
just
embracing
all
the
risk,
it's
about
risk
management
and
so
part
of
what
I
think
we'll
want
to
do
as
we
bring
together
these
case
initial
case.
Studies
that
involve
into
pilots
is,
do
a
pretty
good
risk
management
kind
of
section
of
them
and
let
you
know
which
ones
we
think
now
these
are.
These
are
just
normal
procurement
sure
bets.
This
is
fine
versus
you
know
this.
These
are
the
risks
associated
with
this
in
forward
right.
C
I
just
want
to
pick
up
where
council
member
Davis
left
off
and
the
good
news,
I
guess
the
good
news
and
bad
news
is
that
we're
not
there
at
least
adopters
right.
We've
got
a
lot
of
cities
in
front
of
us,
and
you
know
I
can
recall
it
that
innovation
circle
and
you
gave
a
great
presentation
there.
Kipp
we
heard
from
a
lot
of
private
sector
folks
who
advocated
that
week
that
we
buddy
up
with
you
know
the
singapore's
and
barcelona's
of
the
world
and
and
I
think
there's
a
great
value
in
that
Nessa.
C
If
nothing
else
just
to
really
identify
the
real
use
cases
and
separate
the
wheat
from
the
chaff,
chaff
here,
because
I
see
a
lot
of
applications
of
IOT
out
there.
That
just
don't
make
any
sense
to
me.
Just
seemed
like
a
lot
a
generate
a
lot
of
heat,
not
very
much
light,
and
even
you
know,
as
I
think
about
some
of
the
ones
that
may
look
make
sense
for
other
cities
like
Kansas
City
has
that
road
maintenance
program
using
data
analytics
and
I
think
you
know.
C
You
know
somewhat
reflected
I
think
in
our
negotiation,
with
with
any
con
that
there
are
a
lot
of
options
out
there
and
just
trying
to
find
the
right
ones
that
actually
have
impact
for
our
residences
and
isn't
self-evident,
and
so
to
what
extent
does
it
make
sense
for
us
to
try
to
formalize
relationships
with
some
of
these
cities
who
that
are
way
out
there?
So
we
can
really
really
learn
from
from
what
they've
done.
I
think.
D
There's
a
real
there,
they're,
the
you
know,
this
work
is
being
done
at
the
city
level,
more
than
any
other
place,
and
there
is,
as
you've
seen
a
relatively
short
list
of
those
cities
that
are
in
the
lead.
Many
of
them
have
reached
out
to
us
or
we've
reached
out
to
them
informally
many
of
the
networks
around
smart
cities
are
vendor,
funded
or
vendor
led
networks,
and
they
have
their
value.
D
You
get
to
learn
a
lot
about
different
things
that
people
might
sell
you
but
they're,
not
necessarily
geared
to
be
a
forum
where
you
kind
of
can
sit
down
and
have
open
candid
directs.
City-To-City
conversations
so
I
think
there's
a
lot
there
and
I
I
think
in
addition
to
sort
of
one-off
there's
some
opportunities
for
some
convenience
and
some
gatherings
and
some
conversations
around
those
so
I
think
well,
we
can
put
that
on
part
of
the
smart
city
roadmap
work.
D
It's
how
to
how
to
build
that
that
community,
better
and
I
know
there
are
folks
in
your
office
who
do
that
kind
of
networking
and
outreach
really
well.
So
we'll
probably
lean
back
on
you
and
we
do
that.
But
you
know,
far
from
being
a
junket
I,
think
there's
a
lot
pragmatically
to
learn
from
the
singapore's
and
the
barcelona's
of
the
world
and
even
the
Kansas
cities
to
give
them
their
credit
well
book.
C
Our
tickets
to
Barcelona
before
Kansas
II,
know
I
appreciate
that
yeah
I
appreciate
all
your
explanation,
about
sort
of
the
one
two
three
not
being
purely
sequential,
because
I
can
imagine.
There
are
opportunities
for
us
to
figure
out
a
lot
of
things
about
platform
and
privacy
and
cybersecurity,
while
we're
piloting
and
I'd
hate
to
think
we're,
gonna
stop
doing
the
piloting
while
we're
waiting
and
get
it
all
right.
C
I
mean
you
know,
I
think
I
think
we
have
to
be
tolerant
with
the
fact
that
we're
gonna
only
be
able
to
put
together
a
Chevy
cybersecurity
policy
until
we
learn
enough
to
be
able
to
put
together
a
Cadillac
and
and
I
also
suspect
that
there
are
applications
in
use
cases
where
you
know
cybersecurity
in
the
context
of
o
of
a
roti
that
helps
our
Parks
Department
figure
out
how
much
the
water
lawns.
It's
probably
not,
there's
not
nearly
as
much
risk
there.
D
Ability
for
malicious
actors,
whether
or
not
there's
actually
a
financial
gain
for
them,
is
always
something
that
I'm
concerned
I.
Think
in
terms
of
financial
risks.
You're,
absolutely
right.
You
know
payment
and
money
are
much
higher,
but
somebody
who
wants
to
turn
all
the
water
sprinklers
on
to
have
a
good
time.
You
know
we
want
to.
We
want
to
make
sure
we've
got
them.
We've
got
them
sewed
down
as
well
and
I.
Think
one
of
the
mistakes
on
some
of
the
earlier
devices,
for
example
it
without
getting
into
into
too
much
detail.
D
C
I
I
Try
to
consider
myself,
you
know,
as
tech
savvy
is
a
regular
like
consumer
like
non
like
coder
can
be
and
I
I,
don't
think
the
the
term
or
the
concept
of
IOT
has
really
entered
the
mainstream
consciousness.
Yet
you
know
we
know
about
Wi-Fi.
We
know
about,
like
you
know,
shooting
GPS
and
like
LTE,
maybe
but
IOT.
I
You
know
I
I
in
my
own
research
of
IOT
and
what
a
smart
city
potentially
is
I
look
at
these
websites
and
you
know
we
got
smart
trash
cans
and
we
have,
like
you
know,
light
poles
that
can
like
you
know.
We
hear
gunshots
like
all
this
stuff,
but
I
do
know,
and
we
have
people
who
come
and
express,
like
a
fear
of
or
a
downside,
to
these,
these
applications
and
I
guess
like
what
I'm
saying
is
I,
don't
necessarily
know
what
the
menu
is.
I
So
you
know
council,
member
Davis-
and
you
were
saying
about
meters
for
sprinklers
and
I
heard
a
podcast
of
the
day
about
Chicago,
doing
something
on
their
streets
where
they
can
kind
of
measure
traffic
patterns
and
see.
If,
like
you
know,
what
part
of
the
cities
have
hard
stops
when
pedestrians
cross
the
street
for
some
reason
and
they
can
know
which
street
intersections
are
the
most
dangerous
for
some
reason,
and
so
their
unlimited,
seemingly
applications
of
a
smart
city,
and
we
don't
have
unlimited
resources.
I
I
Yes,
but
it's
a
very
blurry
concept
generally
and
if
we
want
the
public
buy-in,
we
should
you
know
at
least
get
the
councilmembers
understand
it,
and
also
do
the
Pogue
outreach
to
say
this
is
potentially
the
future
of
the
city
of
tomorrow,
and
here
are
the
possibilities:
here's
here's
the
menu.
Let's
pick
what
we
want
to
go
down,
because
I
think
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
cool
things
that
we
can
do
with
it
and
and
I
just
don't
know.
I
can't
really
see
concretely.
I
D
And
so
we
want
to
be
making
sure
that
we're
selecting
the
right
set
to
start
with
and
we'll
bring
that
back
with
you
and
make
that
transparent
to
both
you
and
the
community
on
what
those
technologies
we
are,
that
we're
selecting
and
how
we're
going
to
be
approaching
learning
about
them.
Because
if
you
get
into
this
yeah
there
there
are-
and
this
is
why
we
have
cybersecurity
and
digital
privacy
as
those
two
basic
bars.
There's
some
things
that
are
scary
about
the
potential
of
this
technology.
D
And
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
do
this
in
a
way
that
continues
to
engender
the
public
trust
and
continue
to
make
sure
that
we
are
deeply
respectful
of
people's
privacy
and
rights.
As
we're
doing
this
and
I
think
it's
incumbent
upon
us
to
to
bring
that
back
transparently
to
you
and
to
and
to
acquaint
you
with
what
we
think
are
the
potential
wins
and
get
your
feedback
on
that.
A
A
Just
a
couple
of
points.
One
is
that
I
totally
understand
the
strategy
about
getting
the
basics
right,
but
I
also
understand
the
points
that
were
made
about
not
having
that
hold
us
back.
You're
almost
like
analysis
paralysis,
but
we
all
have
to
understand
and
anybody's
been
around
technology
has
to
understand
that
you
can
do
all
the
research
in
the
world.
You
can
know
all
the
case
studies.
You
can
talk
to
all
the
cities
and
you
still
might
bet
on
beta
versus
VHS
in
just
the
nature
of
technology.
A
It
was
a
better
technology,
it
was
better
technology,
but
it
didn't.
It
didn't
win
us
the
it's
the
dominant
technology,
but
I.
Guess
at
the
point.
Is
that
there's
no
crystal
ball
with
technology
and
we
might
do
everything
we
can
and
then
still
won't
be
the
technology
in
the
future,
and
we
might
make
a
bad
bet,
but
then
we
have
to
be
able
to
learn
from
that
and
pivot
and
go
in
the
right
direction.
But
you
know
we
just
have
to
get
away
from.
A
You
know
this
fear
of
failure
and
I
think
that
you
know
we're
in
this
space
this
technology
space.
It's
almost
runs
counter
to
how
government
is
run
because
there's
this
fear
of
failure,
fear
of
making
the
wrong
decision
and
when
you're
in
the
technology
space.
There
is
a
probability
that
you
could
make
the
wrong
decision,
but
you
have
to
learn
from
it.
So
I
just
want
to
make
make
that
point.
A
I
did
have
another
question
around
the
layers
slide
that
you
had
and
there's
one
of
the
one
of
the
areas
that
I
was
interested
in
is
what
is
just
the
amount
of
bandwidth.
If
we
have
a
deployed
IOT
IOT
network
out
there,
just
the
sheer
amount
of
data
bandwidth
don't
be
required.
You
have
any
kind
of
you
know
high
level
estimation
of
what
we're
looking
at
well.
D
I'll
I'll
do
it
and
I'll
turn
it
back
over
to
Britt
to
go
into
larger
context.
A
lot
of
it
depends
right
because
there
are
applications,
for
example,
that
may
just
send
a
couple
of
bytes
of
data
a
day
over
a
cellphone
line.
There
are
others,
it
might
be
continuously
streaming
high,
high
quality
imagery,
and
so
a
lot
of
this
goes
hand
in
hand
with
our
broadband
strategy
and
our
connectivity
strategy.
D
So
part
of
what
we're
going
to
need
to
do
to
take
full
advantage
of
IOT
is
make
sure
that
more
and
more
of
the
city
is
connected
across
different
means,
but
there
are
lots
of
different
levels
of
data
consumption.
The
simple
way
to
answer
is
a
lot
of
data
and
a
lot
more
and
probably
more
than
we
can
possibly
imagine
the
history
of
data
usage
and
data
transmission
is
that
this
stuff
is
going
to
go
up
and
up
and
up
countering.
D
That,
though,
is
this
notion
of
edge
computing
and
edge
devices,
where
increasingly
a
lot
of
the
work
can
be
done
by
pretty
amazing
computers
out
on
the
edge
right?
If,
if
this
has
more
computing
capability
holding
up
my
phone,
then
the
Space
Shuttle
did
which
it
does
then
clearly
some
of
the
these
edge
devices
can
do
a
lot
of
their
work
internally.
J
Think
you're
right
that
the
the
connectivity
and
the
bandwidth
is
projected
to
become
a
bottleneck
in
the
future,
but
it's
not
traditionally
a
bottleneck
today,
and
so
as
as
Kip
alluded
as
more
and
more
applications
come
online,
particularly
more
and
more
bandwidth
demanding
applications
like
video
and
audio
live
streaming.
That's
when
you're
going
to
see
expansions,
and
so
the
way
cities
are
dealing
with.
J
This
is
twofold
one,
as
they
said,
making
sure
that
they're
limiting
how
much
has
to
go
through
the
pipe
biood
processing,
because
that's
that's
projected
to
be
an
issue
and
then
also
prioritizing.
What's
most
important,
you
know
if
we
ever
reach
a
point
where
we
have
more
demand
than
we
have
bandwidth,
it
will
be
about
highlighting
which
or
which
things
go
first
and.
A
D
And
this
is
where
actually
some
of
the
privacy
concerns
and
other
issues
might
be
in
alignment.
So,
for
example,
if
we
we
realize
we
want
to
have
some
sensors
on
a
street
and
let's
say
we
realize
the
actual
use
that
we
need
is
to
determine
whether
there's
a
part
car
in
this
space
or
not.
I,
don't
need
full
streaming
video
in
color.
That
can
tell
me
everything
about
everything
else.
That's
going
on
and
from
from
a
privacy
standpoint.
I
may
not
want
that.
A
D
J
The
benchmarking
that
we
did
of
other
cities,
particularly
US
cities,
a
lot
of
that
them
are
deploying
there.
There
are
larger
and
more
mature
IOT
applications
using
a
bond
measure
it
as
a
way
to
essentially
acquire
the
capital
on
something
that
they
believe
has.
You
know
substantial
payback,
and
so
we
saw
bond
usage
across
a
large
number
of
cities
who
did
their
LED
streetlights,
for
example,
but
also
for
other
technologies,
traffic
management
in
Atlanta,
etc.
And
my
my.
D
D
So,
similarly,
when
we
do
roads,
when
we
do
sewers,
when
we
do
new
public
libraries,
we
will
assume
and
understand
that
doing
the
appropriate
level
of
connectivity
doing
the
appropriate
level
of
sensors
will
be
part
of
that
built
in
baked
in
cost.
But
it's
going
to
take
us
a
while
to
get
to
that,
and
so
in
the
interim
things
like
bond
funding
or
additional
external
partners,
it's
going
to
be
important
to
jumpstart
and
and
to
build
some
of
the
initial
platform.
Okay,.
A
C
Yeah
I
just
want
to
say
quick.
Thank
you.
First,
the
knight
Foundation
for
the
$200,000
grant
that
was
critical
to
fund
this
very
important
work.
I
want
to
thank
our
partners
at
PwC,
really
appreciate
your
insights,
so
I
want
to
thank
you,
chef,
Gupta
and
Dawn
beckel
and
Shireen
for
her
help
in
getting
the
grant.
A
G
G
That's
a
very
important
component
to
all
this
privacy
policy.
Talk
that
you're
learning
to
talk
about
and
that's
gonna
be
you're
gonna
be
focusing
on
for
the
next
year
and
how
to
develop.
There
has
to
be
a
very
important
component
that
you
know
this
is
a
public
process
and
then
the
public,
you
know,
I,
understand,
you're
building,
you
know
infrastructure,
but
it's
okay
to
invite
the
public.
Basically,
that's
what
I'm
trying
to
say
it
is
okay.
G
You
can
trust
us
it's
just
that
simple
and
and
with
that,
it
can
be
that
easy
to
learn
steps
out
of
how
to
include
the
public
more
into
this
process,
and,
just
you
know,
I'm
working
on
guidelines,
I'm
working
on
all
the
organizational
ideas
of
I
always
talk
about,
like,
for
instance,
Deb,
Davis,
I.
Think
you
a
lot
for
your
ideas
about
public
agent,
about
a
smart
city
platform
or
people
are
working
all
together
at
this
time.
I
want
to
be
a
part
of
that
too.
I'm
from
the
community
I'm
considered
a
fool.
G
I'm
considered
a
know-nothing,
but
yet
I
want
to
be
a
part
of
it
just
for
the
fun
of
it.
Just
for
the
you
know,
and
venomous
and
learning
and
knowledge
and
I'm
I'm
excited
by
this
stuff
and
I
want
to
talk
to
the
knight
foundation
myself,
as
a
member
of
the
community
and
I
want
to
see
what
their
feelings
are
and
then
they
talked
to
somebody,
and
then
they
talked
to
somebody,
and
then
we
have
a
whole
process
and
I.
G
F
Good
afternoon,
dr.
Roxanna
Marashi,
oh
the
Education
Committee
of
the
San
Jose
Silicon
Valley
at
n,
double
acp
I'm.
Also
an
education
researcher
I
came
in
spoke
at
the
last
meeting.
How
much
time
do
I
have
by
the
way
two
minutes?
Okay,
as
I
sit
and
listen.
I
want
to
thank
you
for
the
critical
questions
that
you're
asking
in
the
concerns
that
you
have
about.
The
rollout
of
IOT
I
look
forward
to
hearing
more
about
the
privacy
policy.
F
The
face
book,
Tara
graph
I
noticed
that
on
the
board
of
the
advisory
board
has
all
folks
in
the
tech
industry
and
there
isn't
anyone
from
public
I'll,
just
read
them
off:
Aris
Cisco,
Dell,
Intel,
orb,
comm,
Rev
to
PayPal
and
Panasonic.
There's
an
anyone
from
academia
there's
an
anyone
from
public
health
or
from
the
community.
F
Advising
on
these
issues.
There
are
very
serious
health
concerns
with
some
of
the
technology
that's
being
rolled
out
very
serious
privacy
concerns.
I
have
created
a
public
page.
It's
a
bit
ly
forward,
slash
San,
Jose,
smart
I'll
be
tweeting
it
making
it
public
soon
in
the
interest
of
transparency
and
the
interest
of
public
awareness.
I
think
when
concerns
come
up
publicly,
they
need
to
be
addressed.
I
encourage
you
to
reach
out
to
the
scientists
there's
over
a
hundred
and
eighty.
F
F
You,
you
are
the
the
best
chance
we
have
at
protection
and
when
these
kinds
of
things
happen,
you
know
I,
wonder
sometimes
the
folks
in
power
and
Flint
if
they
knew
that
there
was
concern
about
public
health
issues
and
they
went
ahead
with
the
decision
so
anyway
it
it
ends
up
putting
people
in
jeopardy,
so
just
want
to
make
it
public
that
those
those
concerns
have
been
made.
I
look
forward
to
hearing
more
about
the
privacy
policy
and
the
face
book,
paragraph
and
again
concerned
about
the
structure
of
these
things
and
access
to
data.
D
Okay,
I'd
like
to
invite
down
to
the
podium
Erica,
Groff
and
Rob
Lloyd,
to
walk
us
through
our
initial
cut
at
how
we
want
to
be
both
developing
the
policies
and
engaging
our
community
with
that
I
believe
I'm.
Turning
this
over
to
Erica,
oh
I'm,
sorry
also
Shireen
is
joining
us
as
well.
My
apologies.
K
The
city's
current
digital
privacy
policies
focus
on
specific
applications.
The
city's
website,
the
my
San
Jose
application
and
our
library's
patron
privacy
policy
are
examples
of
where
the
city
has
taken
a
service,
specific
approach
to
protecting
personally
identifiable
information,
and
though
this
approach
is
not
uncommon.
Among
peer
cities,
we
recommend
having
an
overarching
set
of
principles
to
privacy
in
order
to
better
serve
current
and
future
uses
of
data,
so
that
we
have
a
single
source
of
truth
to
provide
governance.
K
Developing
a
citywide
approach
to
digital
privacy
will
take
time,
effort
and
collaboration
with
internal
and
external
stakeholders,
but
user
privacy
can't
wait
by
taking
an
iterative
approach.
We
can
pilot
use
case
specific
privacy
policies
on
the
road
to
enacting
a
broader
digital
privacy
set
of
principles.
The
city
is
poised
to
embark
on
several
IOT
pilot
projects
that
you
just
heard
about,
and
these
may
include
cameras
and
other
sensing
devices
in
the
public
right-of-way.
K
These
pilots
are
driving
the
need
to
develop
a
new
digital
privacy
policies
because
of
the
rapid
expansion
in
type
and
quantity
of
data,
as
well
as
new
concerns
over
privacy.
Our
future
smart
cities
work
requires
us
to
have
a
robust
privacy
and
security
foundation
upon
which
to
build
our
platforms.
If
we're
going
to
deliver
on
a
people,
centric
IOT
approach,
as
you
just
heard
about,
then
we
need
a
thoughtful
approach
to
digital
privacy.
K
We
also
want
to
strike
a
balance
between
cybersecurity,
the
public's
right
to
privacy
and
the
utility
of
data,
the
tighter
we
constrain
ourselves
on
cyber
security
and
privacy,
the
less
useful
the
data
becomes.
Similarly,
if
we
open
the
floodgate
and
allow
all
data,
then
we
aren't
protecting
our
security
or
the
public's
right
to
privacy.
Very
well.
So
one
example
of
this
trade-off
occurred
during
the
flood
event.
K
Flood
victims
were
asked
to
provide
their
information
for
relief
assistance,
but
some
residents
opted
out
of
having
their
information
shared
between
relief
agencies
when
we
couldn't
share
information
between
service
providers,
our
ability
to
provide
relief
assistance
was
constricted.
Part
of
this
equation
lies
in
earning
the
public's
trust
about
why
we
are
collecting
data.
The
balance
of
security,
privacy
and
utility
is
all
part
of
the
conversation
that
we
intend
to
have
with
internal
external
stakeholders
to
better
understand
what
works
for
San,
Jose.
B
So
last
year,
when
we
started
to
embark
on
our
thinking
around
IOT
and
privacy,
I
engaged
the
Harvard
Law
School
to
help
us
to
start
thinking
about
privacy.
So,
for
those
of
you
who
have
not
heard
of
the
cyber
law
clinic,
provides
pro
bono,
legal
advice
to
clients
on
internet,
new
technology
and
intellectual
property,
and
this
effort
was
overseen
by
Professor
Steven,
Susan
Crawford.
Who
for
those
of
you
who
haven't
heard
of
her,
she
is
one
of
the
foremost
legal
minds
in
the
country.
B
Some
of
her
accolades
include
serving
as
special
assistant
to
President
Obama
on
science
technology
and
an
innovation
policy,
as
well
as
being
named
Time
magazine's,
one
of
Time
Magazine's
Most
Influential
minds
in
tech.
So
we
had
the
best
thinking
on
our
initial
cut
around
privacy
around
this
privacy
policy
and
so
a
team
of
students
overseen
by
Susan
Crawford,
benchmarked
13
cities
around
the
country
on
private,
the
privacy,
their
privacy
policies,
as
well
as
looked
at
California
statutes
for
us,
and
there
was
a
few
things
that
were
main
themes
that
came
out
of
this
effort.
B
So
one
is
that
there
really
isn't
a
one-size-fits-all
to
privacy.
So
every
community
needs
to
build
privacy
principles
and
a
privacy
approach
that
works
for
their
community.
The
second
is
that
the
process
of
engagement
is
as
important
as
the
details
of
the
policy
and
we've
heard
from
some
of
our
community
members
here
and
I.
Think
that
you
know
we
need
to
ensure
that
we
take
seriously
the
issue
of
privacy
and
maintaining
public
trust.
B
I
think
we
have
a
responsibility
and,
dare
I,
say
an
obligation,
as
the
largest
city
in
Silicon
Valley,
to
help
our
community
and
work
with
them
to
ensure
that
we
are
embracing
technology
in
a
way
that
benefits
our
residents.
The
third
insight
was
that
it
can
be
very
helpful
for
cities
across
the
country
to
have
a
chief
privacy
officer.
B
You
can
see
that
Seattle
is
best
practice
on
many
dimensions
and
then
other
cities
show
forward
leaning
approach
on
multiple
dimensions,
and
so
what
this
means
is
that,
as
we
move
forward
in
this
effort,
we
need
to
bring
the
best
minds
on
to
this
issue,
engage
our
community
and
continue
to
iterate
and
learn
throughout
the
process.
Thank
you.
K
So
delving
into
it
a
little
bit
in
their
research
Harvard
identified
four
different
approaches
to
privacy:
each
has
their
relative
pros
and
cons
and
I'll
go
into
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
that.
We
can
use
this
framework
to
consider
which
approach
to
use
in
San
Jose
or,
if
there's
a
blend
of
each
that
might
work
best.
K
First,
an
enterprise-wide
approach
aims
to
set
up
a
guidance
framework
that
would
apply
to
all
departments
and
potentially
third
parties,
depending
on
the
structure
of
the
approach.
In
theory,
this
approach
works
best
as
a
North
Star,
which
can
be
used
as
a
point
of
universal
agreement
among
stakeholders
of
differing
ideology
without
delving
too
far
into
project
specific
details.
The
hope
is
to
institutionalize
an
approach
which
is
future
proof
against
fast
changing
technology.
In
practice,
it
can
be
challenging
to
draft
an
all-encompassing
policy
that
meets
the
needs
of
everyone
and
is
still
effective.
K
More
focused
IOT
specific
policies
are
still
high
level,
but
can
incorporate
a
more
nuanced
approach
for
the
ever
evolving
nature
of
IOT
New
York
City
pioneered
this
approach
with
their
published
set
of
IOT
guidelines
in
a
city
with
over
50
different
agencies
and
hundreds
of
thousands
of
employees.
Hundreds
of
thousands
of
employees
taking
on
privacy
related
to
IOT
was
a
more
practical
effort
than
Enterprise
wine.
There
is
also
the
appeal
of
testing
out
the
robustness
of
a
privacy
policy
on
an
own
technology
before
broadening
it
to
an
enterprise-wide
approach.
K
The
majority
of
cities
interviewed
by
Harvard
take
a
project-by-project
approach
which
affords
more
flexibility
in
making
sure
that
privacy
guidelines
are
in
sync,
with
the
technology
being
used
as
new
technologies.
Develop
cities
can
ensure
that
past
approaches,
don't
inadvertently,
stifle
new
applications
for
future
development
and
lastly,
on
the
international
front,
there
are
some
cities
governed
by
national
legislation.
We
should
note
that
there
is
unlikely
to
be
national
legislation
in
the
US
on
this
topic
in
the
near
term,
but
there
is
a
potential
California
ballot
measure
that
is
currently
gathering
signatures.
K
Using
an
iterative
approach,
we
will
engage
a
cross-departmental
working
group
of
inside
and
outside
subject
matter
experts
to
review
the
material
from
Harvard
and
develop
guiding
principles.
We
will
also
continue
to
research
how
the
cities,
how
other
cities
are
approaching
this
issue
especially
locally,
for
example,
both
Santa
Clara,
County
and
Oakland-
have
surveillance
ordinances
governing
privacy
and
Oakland
has
taken
an
additional
measure
by
enacting
a
privacy
Advisory
Commission
proach
will
include
engagement
with
internal
stakeholders
with
city
manager's
office,
attorney's
office,
IT
library
and
various
city
departments,
including
Public
Safety.
K
We
will
also
engage
with
and
solicit
the
views
of
the
general
public
community
members
and
queue
organizations
such
as
the
ACLU.
We
recommend,
using
certain
priority
use
cases
for
piloting,
focused
privacy
policies
in
learning
from
these
pilots,
we
can
iterate
and
modify
the
draft
privacy
principles
and
policies.
K
Finally,
with
approval
from
the
council,
we
will
implement
these
principles
assuring
mentioned.
Other
cities
have
found
that
their
approach
is
aided
by
creating
a
chief
privacy
officer
role
to
oversee
implementation
and
governance,
though
we
do
not
currently
have
a
plan
to
hire
for
this
role.
This
is
something
that
the
council
may
wish
to
consider.
We
will
also
need
to
set
up
a
mechanism
to
monitor
the
privacy
principles
for
compliance
and
a
plan
for
periodic
refresh
to
the
policies,
given
that
this
is
an
aggressive
timeline
and
the
importance
of
having
an
approach
to
digital
privacy.
K
We
need
you
to
prioritize
this
work
both
through
the
budget
and
showing
your
support
during
council
priority
setting
this
work
requires
significant
time,
effort
and
collaboration
to
do
well.
There
are
many
questions
we
need
to
consider
and
more
still,
that
we
haven't
yet
thought
of,
such
as
who
owns
the
data
and
for
how
long
are
we
required
to
store
it,
and
where
should
we
have
a
data
monetization
strategy?
These
are
complicated
questions
that
require
a
thoughtful
approach.
At
this
point,
we're
seeking
the
committee's
guidance
and
input
on
these
questions,
our
approach
and
community
engagement.
D
I'll
just
close
very
quickly,
with
again
appreciation
for
Shireen
her
leadership
working
with
Harvard,
to
give
us
an
initial
cut
at
how
we
how
we
can
begin
to
think
about
this
and
to
echo
some
of
the
earlier
conversations
and
comments
from
both
the
council
and
the
community.
You
know
we
really
feel
strongly
that
we've
got
a
lot
of
smart
folks
in
and
around
this
valley
and
a
lot
of
people
with
very
important
perspectives
to
engage
in.
D
So
we
fully
expect
to
be
creating
a
robust
opportunity
for
people
to
engage
face-to-face
with
a
online
with
us
and
seeking
out
the
institutions
and
individuals
around
this
town
and
Indus
Valley.
That
can
can
help
us
think
through
this
together.
So
we've
gone
a
little
bit
slower
than
we
wanted.
Our
slowness,
though,
is
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
just
get
out
ahead
of
our
community
on
this
important
conversation,
as
Erica
mentioned.
D
Are
our
initial
thinking
now
is
that
we
will
want
to
come
out
with
some
specific
privacy
policies
that
relate
to
key
things
that
we
want
to
get
going
with,
but
also,
at
the
same
time
in
parallel,
be
developing
these
overarching
principles.
But
that's
that
also
is
up
for
debate
and
discussion.
So
I'll
close
here
with
these
questions
that
we
know
we're
going
to
consider
and
be
considering
as
we
go
through
the
privacy
policy
and
be
open
to
any
questions,
comments
or
feedback
that
you
might
have.
C
Thank
you,
I
just
want
to
echo
the
thanks
to
Professor
Crawford
and
all
the
HLS
students
who
worked
on
this
in
the
Shireen
for
again
being
able
to
help
us
secure
resources
that
we
know
that
we're
you
know
it's
difficult
when
we're
dealing
with
a
general
fund,
that's
got
a
ongoing
deficit.
It
seems
every
year
to
find
money
to
do
important
things
like
this.
That
inevitably
will
conflict
with
priorities
like
putting
cops
out
on
the
street
and
in
paving
roads.
It's
really
important.
C
We
find
the
resources,
so
thank
you
for
doing
it
and
I'm
guessing
they're,
responding
to
shrink
because,
since
I
graduate
from
HLS
I,
don't
think
they've
gotten
much
of
my
money,
so
so
I
appreciate
that
you
were
able
to
get
them
to
help
I
I
wanted
to
I.
Guess,
look
at
really
what
we
can
do
with
the
limited
resources
we
have
and
then
understand
what
we
need
to
get
to
do
the
bigger
things
it.
H
C
D
D
Don't
want
to
speak
for
anybody
in
the
audience,
but
I
suspect
that
that
goes
a
long
way
toward
both
being
an
easy
policy
to
to
implement
and
something
that
we
can
do
without
having
to
go
through
a
great
deal
of
of
expertise
on
if
we've,
some
at
some
point
decide
to
monetize
I,
think
that
requires
more
expertise
and
engagement
and
and
broader
discussion.
So
I
think
you
are
right.
D
We
can
prioritize
this
work
as
long
as
we
have
the
sort
of
default
toward
privacy
on
the
things
that
we
don't
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
now,
I
believe
that
puts
us
in
a
strong
position
and,
frankly
this.
This
is
also
one
of
those
things
that
we
also
need
to
do
as
part
of
how
we
do
business
right
anytime,
that
we
are
dealing
with
a
new
technology.
We
need
to
be
thinking
about
privacy,
it's
not
an
extra
or
an
add-on,
it's
core
to
what
we
should
be
doing
as
a
city.
D
So
right
now,
we
do
need
to
have
some
more
muscle
and
build
into
it.
We've
we've
reassigned,
Erica
and
and
allowed
her
space
and
time
to
lead
this
and
we'll
be
an
are
bringing
together
the
working
group
of
folks
across
the
department,
including
some
of
sharpest
minds
in
public
safety
and
others
to
be
engaging
and
working
on
this,
and
so
we
will
do
this
well
without
having
to
add
a
significant
amount
of
additional
resources
in
our
first
cut
at
it.
Okay,.
H
C
Thanksgiving
and
a
belated
thank-you
darica
for
spearheading
this
I
guess
my
gut
says.
I
know
there
are
a
lot
of
priorities
who
want
to
spend
money
on
within
the
innovation
space,
and
it
would
seem
to
me
that
where
there
are
applications
that
really
do
challenge
us
to
have
to
go,
get
a
lot
of
professional
help
or
bringing
resources.
You
know
there
may
be
companies
there
that
we're
partnering
with
that
may
be
willing
to
help
us
with
that,
but
I
guess
I'll
leave
that
for
for
the
specific
case
as
it
comes
up.
Thank
you.
A
D
Started
our
engagement
with
the
ACLU
folks
and
we've
I'm,
a
disc
full
disclosure
I'm
a
card-carrying
member
of
the
ACLU
I,
do
believe.
A
lot
of
what
they've
got
is
a
really
useful
point
of
departure.
What
we're
not
going
to
do
it
with
any
of
our
policies.
That
would
say
that
any
one
stakeholder
has
an
absolute
lock
on
the
perspective,
but
you
know
a
lot
of
the
points
that
they
raise
the
structure
that
they
bring
about
the
concerns
they
raise.
D
They've
really
done
a
lot
of
good
thinking
about
this
and
I
think
as
somebody
who
for
whom
it
is
important
to
maintain
the
public
trust.
We're
gonna
both
continue
our
engagement
with
them,
deepen
it
and
also
take
the
work
that
they've
done
very
centrally
to
the
policies
that
we
put
back.
Our
hope
is
that
they'll
see
that
reflected
in
what
they
come
up
with,
but
there
are
also
a
lot
of
other
effectives
that
we
need
to
take
into
account
in
balance
as
well
great.
A
A
L
Good
afternoon,
mayor
and
councilmembers,
my
name
is
Victor
sin
I'm,
a
resident
of
San
Jose
and
also
the
chair
of
the
Santa
Clara
Valley
chapter
of
the
ACLU
of
Northern
California
I.
Thank
several
staff
members
for
meeting
with
me
earlier
this
month
to
discuss
civil
liberties
and
privacy
concerns
I
greatly
appreciate
so
gaiter
effort,
okay
and
I.
Look
forward
to
continuing
to
work
with
them
in
the
future.
I
also
want
to
thank
keep
for
pointing
out
or
using
a
hypothetical
example.
Earlier
he
mentioned
tax.
L
Okay,
you
know,
in
the
case
of
let's
say,
using
sensors
to
detect
the
presence
or
absence
of
a
vehicle
in
a
parking
space.
He
approached
okay.
Well,
he
mentioned
that
occasion
reviews
if
he
collects
the
right
amounts
of
data;
in
other
words,
not
an
excessive
amount
of
data.
That's
really
its
bandwidth
and
computational
problem.
I
would
also
add
text,
okay,
collecting
the
right
amounts
of
data
and
not
an
excessive
amounts
of
data.
We
also
protect
civil
liberties,
for
example.
Using
the
same
example,
we
are
not
going
to
read
license
plate
numbers
rights.
L
We
only
need
to
tell
whether
there
is
or
isn't
a
vehicle
in
a
particular
place,
so
in
this
scenario,
utility
and
privacy
actually
go
hand
in
hand.
I've
also
like
to
point
out
stacks
who
care
privacy
and
data
policy.
While
importance
does
not
address
the
question
of
legal
enforcement
and
ordinance
is
legally
enforceable
as
the
ways
of
law
behind
it.
L
It's
not
clear
to
me
what
will
happen
if
a
policy
is
violated
also
I
do
not
know
whether
the
scope
of
the
proposed
policy
is
broad
enough
to
govern
all
types
of
data
that
have
the
potential
of
being
used
for
surveillance.
In
other
words,
there
may
be
sometimes
some
types
of
data
that
are
outside
of
the
umbrella
of
the
smart
cities,
initiatives
that
can
potentially
be
used
for
surveillance
purposes,
so
I
encourage
the
council
members
to
take
this
opportunity
to
develop
and
enact
a
robust
and
comprehensive
surveillance
technology
ordinance.
L
A
G
G
You
know
just
talk
every
week
about
this
and
how
it
makes
me
feel
good
and
how
I
feel
it's
important
and
I'm
going
to
talk
with
government
and
I
guess
to
try
to
offer.
You
know
you
were
using
pictures
to
illustrate
and
you
you
have
like
a
diamond
to
show
for
separate
items
that
you're
working
on
it
looked
like
a
baseball
diamond
and
what
I
think
what
I'm
trying
to
offer
is
the
idea
of
kind
of
like
a
cricket
diamond
where
a
cricket
batter
he
can.
G
He
has
the
advantage
to
hit
the
ball
backwards,
and
that
gives
you
like
another
option
to
think
about
and
work
with
as
compared
to
baseball
where
everything's
forward
and
I
just
there's
just
so
many
ways
to
think
in
shapes
and
I.
Just
hope.
You
get
excited
by
the
idea
of
civil
rights
and
certain
protections,
they're
really
good
concepts,
and
it's
a
way
to
develop
that
we
are
San.
Jose
concept
that
you
know
was
was
very
helpful
a
few
years
ago
and
I
think
I
think
we
can
add
a
very
important
dimension
to
that.
G
D
So
today
you
gonna
hear
about
an
update
on
one
of
our
most
innovative
projects,
our
collaboration
with
Facebook
on
Tara
graph.
The
hypothesis
was
that
we
could
use
downtown
San
Jose
as
a
proving
ground
for
facebook,
Tara
graphs,
new
millimeter-wave
technology
that
provides
through
the
air
high
speed
backhaul
for
outdoor
Wi-Fi.
This
technology
has
never
been
deployed
at
scale
in
an
urban
environment.
We
here
in
San
Jose
are
the
first
as
such.
Almost
everything
about
this
project
has
pushed
our
thinking,
helped
us
to
learn
and
challenged
our
processes
and
approach.
D
As
a
result,
we
are
changing
everything
from
how
we
get
things
up
on
poles
to
how
we
think
about
the
city's
role
in
public
Wi-Fi.
So
before
we
we
hear
from
Facebook
I
want
to
appropriately
set
expectations.
As
I
have
said
all
along.
This
is
one
of
our
most
innovative
plays
and
as
such,
we
don't
know
if
it
will
succeed
at
scale
or
be
the
technology
that
we
want
continue
to
operate.
That's
what
we're
learning
now,
that
is
what
the
current
engineering
trials
are
for,
and
the
next
phase
of
work
around
thinking
of
our
strategy.
D
So
to
be
clear
at
this
point,
Tara
Graff
is
not
ready
to
replace
our
wickedly
fast
Wi-Fi.
It
is
an
amazing
and
exciting
technology,
and
but
don't
take
my
word
for
it,
you
should
hear
both
the
details
from
the
Facebook
team
and
for
those
of
you
who
are
members
of
the
city
staff,
including
council
members,
have
the
opportunity
to
dog
food
the
technology
and
try
it
out
for
yourself
with
that.
I
am
pleased
to
introduce
our
partner
Yael
McGuire
VP,
for
connectivity
at
Facebook
to
talk
you
through
the
work
of
his
team.
G
H
H
Our
mission
is
to
develop
next-generation
technologies
that
can
bring
down
the
cost
of
connectivity
by
an
order
of
magnitude,
so
we
can
reach
the
unconnected
and
increase
capacity
and
performance
forever.
Now
everyone
else.
Our
general
belief
is
that
everything
starts
with
fiber,
but
there
are
no
silver
bullets
to
thinking
about
connectivity
for
everyone.
H
Our
efforts
focus
on
connecting
people
through
the
atmosphere,
the
stratosphere
wirelessly
using
aircraft
and
in
cities.
We're
focused
on
a
project
that
pleased
to
share
with
you
today
called
Terra
graph.
A
common
theme
of
what
will
be
shared
today
is
the
use
of
a
technology
called
millimeter
waves.
It
is
a
part
of
the
spectrum
that
is
millimeters
in
length
and
like
lasers,
you
can
put
capacity
where
you
want
it,
but
without
any
of
the
disadvantages
that
laver
lasers
offer,
so
they
can
go
through
clouds,
rain
and
fog
in
the
future.
H
The
demand
for
greater
bandwidth
will
only
increase
I
think
this
has
been
discussed
a
little
bit
today
and
so
question
we
have
is
what
will
dense
urban
cities
such
as
some
examples
here?
Sound
Paulo,
Berlin
Mumbai,
look
like
in
the
future,
using
public
data
from
Cisco's
vni
data
set
and
Wikipedia
we've
tried
to
project
for
an
entire
city
and
then
on
a
per
kilometer
squared
basis.
H
What
are
going
to
be
the
future
needs
of
those
communities
in
the
year
2021,
and
so
you
can
see
on
a
per
square
kilometer
basis,
and
this
is
inclusive
of
everything.
You
know
video
Internet
of
Things.
What
are
the?
What
are
the
total
data
needs
of
a
community
on
a
per
square
kilometre
basis?
It
ranges
from
about
a
hundred
terabytes
per
square
kilometre
per
month
up
to
300
terabytes
per
square
kilometers
per
month.
It's
huge,
and
so
in
order
to
meet
this
massive
data
demand
of
the
future
in
very
small
areas.
H
H
A
lot
of
connectivity
as
I
mentioned,
starts
with
optical
fiber
networks
that
go
to
the
edge
they're,
a
great
choice
for
delivering
high
bandwidth
connectivity,
but
they
do
present
some
challenges
when
trying
to
take
fiber
to
every
single
building
or
home,
including
the
ones
that
are
listed
here.
So
from
a
cost
perspective.
They
are
very
expensive
to
deploy
their
significant
labor
costs,
as
well
as
the
equipment
needed
to
dig
up
streets
to
lay
fiber,
especially
when
Condit
conduits
do
not
already
exist
they're
longer
to
deploy.
H
It
can
require
a
substantial
time
to
deploy
since
laying
the
fiber
takes
at
time,
as
well
as
the
permitting
process
to
do
so.
There
are
also
inflexible
and
there's
potential
for
damage
so
once
deployed.
Fiber
networks
cannot
be
quickly
expanded
or
taken
in
different
direction
if
demand
arises
or
changes
and
in
certain
regions,
fiber
is
often
damaged
to
a
lack
of
available
municipal
records
leading
to
inadvertent
fiber
cuts.
H
So
we
see
millimeter-wave
technology
as
complementary
to
fiber
networks,
with
some
promising
advantages
over
using
fiber
all
the
way
to
individual
buildings,
one
we
believe
they're,
affordable,
millimeter-wave
infrastructure
itself
requires
what
we
believe
is
a
lower
upfront.
Investment
and
deployment
costs
are
lower,
given
the
labor
that
is
required
to
deploy
them.
H
H
The
first
is
the
infrastructure
cost.
I
did
mention
that
there's
an
opportunity
to
make
this
affordable,
but
we
believe
that
there
still
is
work
to
make
sure
that
the
cost
of
hardware
and
off-the-shelf
components
are
as
low
as
possible.
The
second
is
around
deployment
expenses,
and
this
is
where
partnerships
with
municipalities
are
very
important
to
try
to
utilize
existing
infrastructure,
to
deploy
those
off-the-shelf
components
and
street
furniture
is
one
way
that
we
think
is
possible
for
doing
that.
H
But
we
do
believe
that
in
almost
every
deployment
of
thinking
about
wireless
broadband
in
the
future,
it's
going
to
be
a
combination
of
unlicensed
and
licensed
band
technology
and
because
of
this
focus
on
unlicensed
technology,
Terra
graph
is
our
big
bet
and
what
we
hope
will
be
a
next
important
step
in
the
evolution
of
wireless
backhaul.
It
is
a
60
gigahertz,
multi
node
wireless
backhaul
system
designed
to
deliver
gigabit
speeds
to
dense
urban
areas
at
a
fraction
of
the
cost
of
fiber.
H
Most
recently
at
Mobile
World
Congress
in
Barcelona
in
February
I
was
there
myself.
We
were
excited
to
announce
our
upcoming
Terra
graph
field
trials
with
Telenor
in
Kuala,
Lumpur
Malaysia
and
with
Deutsche
Telekom
in
the
Budapest
area
of
Hungary,
but
today,
I'm
really
excited
to
focus
on
our
first
tera
graph
field
trial.
H
H
So
each
one
of
those
little
nodes,
little
circles
represents
a
node
in
the
network
and
the
green
lines
are
showing
all
the
links
that
exists
in
the
in
the
Terra
graph
network
in
the
city
of
San,
Jose,
and
so
one
of
the
goals
and
thinking
about
deploying
a
citywide
scale
network
is
thinking
about
an
analogy
of
the
Sun
and
I
like
to
think
about
Wireless.
In
this
way,
we
want
no
dead
spots.
We
want
the
Sun
to
shine
everywhere,
and
the
same
thing
is
true
for
wireless.
H
H
So
the
traditional
model
is
to
pull
fiber
to
every
building
to
every
pole
in
the
city,
and
so
we
wanted
to
extend
this
fiber
wirelessly.
To
avoid
that
it's
a
simple
concept
but
deploying
this
at
scale
in
a
city
has
never
been
done
before
it's
designed
to
be
at
consumer
level,
pricing
and
it's
custom
designed
by
Facebook,
but
we
are
working
with
a
whole
ecosystem
of
partners,
OMS
and
mobile
network
operators
to
make
sure
that
this
technology
can
make
it
into
the
world
at
scale.
H
H
Wired
connections
that
come
from
fiber
move
data
from
the
Internet
to
a
few
points
that
you
can
see
here
in
a
geographic
area,
the
data
is
converted
into
60
gigahertz
frequencies
for
wireless
delivery
across
the
city
and
they're.
In
this
deployment
there
are
actually
Wi-Fi
access
points
used
to
connect
to
end
devices
such
as
a
smart
phone
that
I
have,
in
my
hand
and
I've
actually
connected
to
the
network
using
this
specific
phone,
and
we
call
that
the
access
layer,
so
the
overall
benefit
is
the
network
reach
with
this
technology.
H
So
little
bit
of
background
around
the
project
in
our
collaboration.
Tara
graph
is
a
demonstration
project
intended
to
test
gigabit
backhaul
technology
in
a
dense
urban
city.
It's
a
three
year
DPA
that
began
in
January
of
2016
in
terms
of
the
planned
deployment
which
is
now
complete.
We
completed
our
deployment
of
approximately
500
sectors
covering
nearly
three
square
kilometres,
which
was
planned
in
the
downtown
corridor.
H
Recently
we
completed
what
we
call
our
engineering,
validation,
testing
or
EVT,
which
is
a
validation
of
the
performance
of
Tara
graph
operating
at
scale.
And
to
do
this,
we
evaluate
the
performance
with
a
variety
of
mesh
topologies
real-world
deployments.
This
is
not
a
perfect
grid.
No
city
is
a
perfect
grid,
and
so
we
have
to
make
sure
that
in
this
mesh
that
it
works
as
intended,
and
we
track
performance
in
the
real
world
operating
conditions
with
traffic
rain
varying
temperatures
all
these
things.
H
That
in
principle,
could
impact
the
performance
of
this
network
and
we
track
network
availability
so
that
we
can
improve
the
network
conditions
of
that
system.
So
this
work
for
our
EVT
is
now
complete.
In
addition,
the
learnings
that
we
have
attained
from
this
network
have
made
into
contributions
to
the
I
Triple
E.
H
H
So,
just
to
close,
this
has
been
a
wonderful
partnership
with
the
city
of
San,
Jose
and
I,
really
want
to
thank
Kip
and
his
staff
and,
and
everybody
here,
I
believe
that
municipalities,
like
the
city
of
San
Jose,
can
play
an
extraordinary
role
in
connectivity
for
all
people,
and
you
know,
Facebook
in
the
city
have
established
a
three-year
partnership.
It's
been
a
model
engagement
of
a
public-private
of
a
public-private
partnership.
There's
been
deep
collaboration
between
our
teams,
which
has
resulted
in
our
building
out
of
the
largest
60
gigahertz
network
that
likely
exists
in
the
world.
H
We've
benefited
tremendously
by
learning
about
real-world
challenges
and
solutions
by
deploying
this
technology
for
the
first
time
in
industry,
the
world
benefits.
By
sharing
what
we
have
learned
and
together,
we
have
recently
released
a
white
paper
to
educate
cities
and
service
providers
on
learnings
for
deploying
an
urban
dense
Network.
We
thank
the
city
for
its
leadership
and
we
look
forward
to
the
continued
collaboration
so.
D
You
can
see
why
we
are
excited
to
be
working
with
Yael
and
his
team
at
Facebook.
Their
intellect
their
energy
and
their
passion
are
infectious
I
want
to
give
a
particular
shout
out
to
Ritu
Sharma
who's
here,
who
is
the
overall
program
manager
as
well
as
Jean
Paige?
Who
is
the
lead
on
San
Jose
Tara
graph,
as
well
as
to
our
own
teams
in
Public,
Works,
Jeff,
Lee
and
many
others
do
T,
IT
and
Kim
in
particular,
who
have
really
been
thinking
differently
about
how
we
work
and
just
in
closing,
I
did
mention.
D
D
Dogfooding
is
the
way
that
we
talk
about
trying
out
a
new
product
before
it's
been
released,
I
prefer
the
French
version,
which
is
drinking
your
own
champagne,
but
since
we're
government,
employees
we'll
stay
away
from
the
alcohol
and
go
back
to
dogfooding.
So,
as
Yale
mentions,
our
next
steps
are
to
figure
out
how
we
operationalize
this,
including
appropriate
privacy
policies
for
community
users.
As
we
look
forward
to
these
completions
in
these
next
steps,
we
know
that
as
a
city,
we
need
to
formulate
both
a
strategy
around
Tara
graph
and
a
citywide,
intentional
wife,
ID
strategy.
D
The
strategy
should
pose
an
answer.
Such
questions
is
as
what
is
our
role
as
an
outdoor
Wi-Fi
provider.
What
is
our
business
model?
How
do
we
operate
and
maintain
the
system
at
scale?
What
should
our
privacy
policy
be
will
be
working
with
Facebook
to
inform
the
development
of
the
strategy,
but
ultimately
how
we
decide
to
approach?
It
is
our
responsibility
as
a
city
and
then
finally,
in
closing,
I
really
do
want
to
echo
Yale's
comment
about
the
fruitfulness
of
this
partnership.
D
We
certainly
feel
we've
benefited
from
a
little
bit
of
the
kind
of
the
pixie
dust
of
Silicon
Valley
rubbing
off
on
us,
but
I
think
also,
if
I
could
be
so
bold,
especially
as
Facebook
has
shifted
their
mission
to
focus
more
about
creating
good
in
the
real
world.
We
found
that
this
is
a
perfect
place
and
city
to
do
that.
So
we
continue
to
offer
ourselves
beyond
Tara
Graf
as
a
living
laboratory.
D
To
think
about
some
of
the
problems
and
possibilities
that
greater
connectivity
provides
and
you'll
see
over
time,
some
of
those
begin
to
come
forward
and
come
out
as
we
as
we
mature
those
ideas
from
ideas
and
to
pilots.
So
I
really
do
want
to
appreciate
this
partnership
and
that
it
goes
beyond
simply
deploying
a
cool
new
technology
in
our
downtown,
which
is
super
cool,
but
goes
deeper
into
what
I
think
is
exactly
what
a
public-private
partnership
should
be
mutual
benefit
to
each
of
us
and
ultimately
to
our
citizens.
D
A
E
You
thank
you
kid
for
for
mentioning
the
privacy
issue
since
I
haven't
completed,
I
have
to
admit
I
haven't
even
though
I'm
on
the
committee
I
haven't
completed
my
login
information,
yet
apparently
a
multi-day
process
for
me.
I
keep
starting
it
and
getting
interrupted.
I
haven't
read
the
privacy
policy
for
the
employees
to
be
trying
it
out.
What
is
the?
What
what
is
the
current
privacy
policy
while
we're
I'm
not
going
to
use
the
term
dogfooding?
Well
we're
all
Fateh
testing
this
yeah.
D
D
E
D
D
H
I
won't
be
able
to
speak
to
the
specific
words
of
the
legal
text,
but
I
can
talk
about
in
broad
brushstrokes.
What
the
what
the
data
that
is
being
collected
is
so
as
part
of
our
early
stages
of
testing
user
traffic
on
an
we
do
collect
a
limited
amount
of
data
to
test
system
performance.
This
does
include
anonymized
data
on
network
usage
and
it's
used
for
a
performance
measurement
only
not
to
be
shared
with
third
parties,
or
anything
like
that.
So
it's
really
about
trying
to
understand
the
performance
of
the
network
itself
and.
D
M
Councilmember,
so
on
that
the
IPS
and
the
addressing
and
usage
that
we
see
it's
all
for
performance
basis,
the
city
does
have
some
minimal
filtering
to
make
sure
that
people
don't
go
to
egregiously
inappropriate
sites.
You
know
certain
violence
porn
those
kinds
of
things,
but
for
the
actual
content
that
we
have
it's
strictly
about
performance
related
and
anonymize.
So
there's
nothing
that
we
keep
that's
deeper
than
that
and
that's
part
of
the
terms
of
use
that
you'll
see.
Okay,.
E
M
M
M
C
Thank
you
well,
I
just
wanted
to
thank
Jo
and
Ritu
and
the
entire
Facebook
team,
as
well
as
Dolan
and
kept,
and
everybody
Rob.
Of
course
everybody
on
the
city
side.
I
know
this
has
been
a
big
undertaking,
but
a
really
important
one
and
I'm
thrilled
to
see
that
we've
got
the
universe's
largest
60
megahertz
system
up
and
running,
we'll
find
out
how
well
it
runs
in
the
months
ahead,
but
it's
good
to
have
it
and
it's
good
to
be
on
the
leading
edge.
C
Obviously,
when
you
sit
in
these
chairs,
you
tend
to
think
about
okay,
the
next
steps
for
our
residents
right,
the
folks
who
might
take
advantage
of
it
or
folks
who
are
working
downtown
and,
as
I
understand
it
Kip.
We
need
to
have
essentially
a
Wi-Fi
manager
in
place
to
be
doing.
This
work
is
that
right,
yeah.
D
I
mean,
essentially,
you
are
an
outlet
Rob
follow
up
with
on
this,
but
essentially
we're
beginning
to
get
into
a
business
which
is
in
our
core
competency.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
either
the
people
on
board
on
staff
or
that
we
hire
the
appropriate
operator
who
can
run
some
of
the
system
for
us
at
this
point.
The
other
issue
is
that
this
is
the
same
pipe.
If
you
will
that
supporting
the
rest
of
the
city,
so
we
need
to
be
judicious
and
how
much
bandwidth
we
make
available.
D
M
This
is
a
shared
use,
so
it
supports
city
operations,
it
supports
the
Convention
Center,
it
supports
the
airport,
and
so
we
want
to
be
very
purposeful
about
how
we
structure
that
and
have
that
conversation
with
counsel
and
the
resourcing
that
goes
along
with
that
one
important
caveat
I'll
make
is
wickedly
fast
Wi-Fi,
for
example,
was
a
once
in
time
program.
That's
not
funded
on
an
ongoing
basis
for
replacement.
M
C
C
D
Mr.
myself,
I
think
that's
a
really
good
question.
Let
me
do
some
quick
thinking
and
and
back
the
envelope
work
on
that,
because
I
I
think
there
are
alternatives
to
putting
a
person
on
this
that
we
might
be
able
to
bridge
with,
but
I
think.
That's
a
very
good
question
and
I'll
get
a
rapid
rapid
turnaround
on
that.
Okay,.
C
H
F
H
C
H
Both
so
as
Tara
graph
being
a
backhaul
technology,
we
are
observing
gigabit,
like
speeds
in
the
backhaul
Network.
How
that
then
translates
into
what
you
see
on
your
phone.
If
you
go
to
speed
test,
is
gonna
be
different
because
that's
going
to
depend
on
the
access
point,
you're
connected
to
and
then
ultimately
some
of
the
limitations
that
might
exist
in
your
phone.
So
you
know
when
I
use
my
iPhone
7
I
did
not
get
a
gigabit
speed,
because
my
phone
can't
download
a
gigabit.
It's
the
same
thing
in
my
home.
H
I
actually
have
fiber
connected
to
my
home
and
I
can't
get
a
gigabit
either
on
this
phone,
because
it's
a
limitation
of
the
device
right
so
I
think
in
principle
it's
possible
that
a
device
that
connecting
to
an
access
point
that
is
capable
of
getting
a
gigabit
that
connects
to
Tara
graph
in
principle
could
do
that.
But
in
practice
I
think
people
are
gonna,
get
speeds
that
are
lower
than
that,
but
they're
still
really
really
fast.
I
mean
we're
talking.
H
C
I
agreed-
and
you
know,
given
what
we
know
about
the
wickedly
fast
networking
I'm,
not
looking
a
gift
horse
in
the
mouth
here,
so
we
appreciate
whatever
speed
you're
giving
us
that's
fast,
but
I
know.
Forgive
me
if
you've
already
answered
this
question
in
presentation,
I
missed
it.
But
how
soon
do
you
think
we'll
be
at
a
point
where
you're
comfortable
with
the
technical
testing,
and
then
we
could
try
to
take
this
out
on
the
road.
H
Yeah
I
mean
I
think
as
as
articulated
in
the
presentation,
I
think
we're
feeling
pretty
confident
on
the
technology,
which
is
why
we've
sort
of
said
we've
completed
the
EBT
testing
I.
Think
the
next
phase
of
this
is
it's
more
than
just
technology,
to
sort
of
figure
out
what
the
next
steps
are
right.
So
the
conversation
that
you've
been
having
around
sort
of
what
is
the
Wi-Fi
strategy
for
the
city
is
I,
think
a
really
important
decision
to
figure
out
there
I
think.
The
other
aspect
of
this
is
understanding
the
Wi-Fi
technology
itself.
H
As
part
of
that,
that
hasn't
been
our
primary
focus,
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
the
sort
of
last
few
hundred
meters
that
goes
from
fiber
to
Wi-Fi
access
points.
We
wanted
to
make
that
our
focus
and
experimentation,
and
we
feel
really
confident
about
that.
But
we
want
to
be
really
I,
think
careful
and
thoughtful
along
this
along
this
process,
both
to
figure
out
the
Wi-Fi
strategy,
but
also,
you
know,
make
sure
that
things
around
privacy
and
data
protection,
and
things
like
that
like
we're.
Just
we
feel
like
it's
totally
buttoned
up.
Okay,.
C
H
I'm
wearing
my
hat
as
a
technologist
who's
thought
about
connectivity
for
quite
some
time,
but
I
think
I'm
really
excited
about
Terra
graph
and
other
technologies
to
provide
that
kind
of
backbone
to
make
it
so
that
there's
the
opportunity
to
provide
connectivity
into
a
home
such
that
that
child
can,
you
know,
can
have
access
to
do
their
homework.
But
there
is
still
that
last
hundred
meters
of
technology
that
is
required
in
order
to
make
sure
that
the
booster
or
whatever
you
want
to
call
it
that
they
can.
H
You
know,
pull
out
their
their
their
tablet
or
phone
or
laptop
whatnot
and
get
that
connectivity,
whether
it's
directly
in
their
home
or
as
part
of
their
community
and
I,
do
think
that
one
it
depends
on
like
what
type
of
environment
they
live
in.
If
they're
in
a
really
dense
urban
City,
there
may
be
a
different
solution
than
there.
If
and
if
they're
more
in
a
in
a
suburban
sprawl.
H
I
do
think
there
are
technologies
that
are
available
to
do
that.
If
you
to
do
that
at
a
city
scale,
but
they
require
the
you
know,
commitment
and
thoughtfulness
to
sort
of
work
out.
What
that
full
comprehensive
strategy
is
to
make
sure
that
every
child
has
that
opportunity.
I
am
excited
about
technologies
like
Terra
graph,
to
sort
of
make
sure
that
once
those
off-the-shelf
technologies-
and
most
of
them
are
off-the-shelf
to
be
able
to
do
that
last
hundred
meter.
But
they
require
sort
of
a
very
careful
thought
thinking
through
of
how
that's
going.
D
To
be
done,
it
is
and
I
think
our
thought
is
now
that
we
have
some
confidence
in
the
backhaul
capability.
If
you
will,
this
is
the
right
time
to
begin
some
experimentation
with
that.
I
were
particularly
interested
and,
as
I
think
many
folks
on
the
council
are
about
not
only
low-income
families
what
this
might
do
for
them,
but
also
small
businesses.
It
was
very
difficult
and
very
costly
to
get
fibre
to
the
premises
in
some
of
the
small
businesses.
D
What
are
they
off
to
chef
technologies
that
will
allow
them
to
hop
in
and
take
advantage
of
this
and
and
and
and
and
use
this
for
in-home
piece
primarily
right
now
it's
an
outdoor
outdoor
backhaul
to
an
outdoor
Wi-Fi.
So
that's
our
starting
point,
but
we
think
there
is
a
ample
room
for
experimentation
which
we
feel
will
lead
us
to
the
bigger
question
of
how
do
we?
How
do
we
want
to
close
the
digital
divide
and
that's
one
of
quite
separately?
D
I
Office,
thank
you
to
Facebook
for
becoming
our
new
local
affiliate
for
this
committee.
Meeting
on
Facebook
live
I,
see
you
out
there,
but
also
I
I,
like
council
member
Davis,
and
making
this
a
multi-day
effort
to
join
this
network,
not
for
lack
of
trying
I've
tried
to
log
on
using
the
instructions
I
followed
in,
but
I
can't
seem
to
actually
get
on
and
I.
I
Don't
want
to
troubleshoot
that
right
now,
but
I
get
the
password
I
find
the
right
Wi-Fi
put
in
my
username
and
password
and
then
I've
gotten
things
were
unable
to
connect
once
I
got
my
phone
says
it
doesn't
trust
this
network,
but
I
want
to
trust
it
and,
as
I
said,
trust
and
then
one
time
I
did
I.
Think
I
got
connected
to
something
called
free
city
hall
Wi-Fi.
I
Is
that
what
it
was
for
like
a
hot
minute
and
then
just
kind
of
bounced,
so
I'm
continually
trying
over
course
the
number
of
days
I'm
looking
forward
to
testing
this
out,
the
I
guess
the
question
I
have
is
in
terms
of
millimeter
wave
links.
So
my
understanding
is
a
shorter
wavelength.
The
more
capacity
information
can
carry,
but
because,
whatever
reasons
the
the
nodes
have
to
be
closer
together
and
it's
easily
interfered
with
in
terms
of
like
a
building
or
concrete
or
something
is
that
the
same
thing
with
this.
I
That,
okay,
and
just
as
a
measuring
stick
when
we
talk
about
like
the
next
generation
of
like
5g
or
whatever.
How
does
this
so,
if
I
get
on
this
network
and
I
get
to
see
like
I'm,
download,
my
email
or
going
to
websites
or
whatever?
What
is
the
sense?
Is
this
better
than
likes
faster
than
on
part
with,
maybe
slightly
slower
them.
H
It's
a
great
question:
I
think
the
answer
is,
it's
still
to
be
determined,
so
the
standards
for
5g
are
being
kind
of
ratified
as
we
speak,
and
so
what
is
implemented
in
terms
of
both
backhaul
as
well
as
access,
ultimately,
which
goes
to
the
handset,
is
still
being
worked
out.
It
is
subject
also
to
how
much
spectrum
will
be
available
in
a
particular
region
or
country
or
as
implemented
in
particular
technologies.
H
I've
ever
experienced
myself,
so
I'm
pretty
hopeful
that
this
is
going
to
be
a
you
know,
a
really
useful
technology
to
to
kind
of
scale
in
in
the
same
fashion
as
5g,
so
I
do
think.
They're
gonna
be
pretty
complimentary
in
the
same
way
that
Wi-Fi
and
LTE
kind
of
coexist.
I
think
that
the
technology
that
we've
worked
on
Tara
graph
being
in
the
unlicensed
60
gigahertz
bin
I
expect
will
be
complementary,
with
what's
happening
in
5g
as
well,
and.
I
This
is
I'm
gonna,
throw
a
curveball
at
you
to
the
extent
that
you
even
look
into
this
and
I,
don't
know
that
you
did
but
the
differences
in
wavelengths
so
we're
living
in
the
21st
century
and
there's
all
these
things
buzzing
around
Wi-Fi
and
no
4G
and
LTE.
And
now
we
have
this
new
millimeter
shortwave
thing:
you
know
it's.
Yes,
it's
you
have
to
be
determine
what
that
will
actually
have
on
the
the
evolution
of
human
physiology.
I
Whatever
with
all
these
waves
should
be
back
and
forth,
but
to
the
extent
that
there's
a
change
in
the
wavelength,
do
you
care
to
guess
or
just
comment
on
like
are
there's
anything
different
about
that
versus
a
normal
longer
and
a
wave?
That's
you
know:
we've
been
going
back
and
forth
since
the
90s
yeah.
H
It
is
a
good
curveball,
but
I
am
prepared
to
answer
okay,
so
millimeter
waves
and
this
these
are
used
for
5g
as
well
as
for
this
unlicensed,
a
technology
like
Terra
graph.
They
are
millimeter
with
millimeters
in
lengths
and
compared
to
much
longer
wavelengths
up
to
meters
in
length
for
traditional
technology
that
would
exist
over.
You
know
Wi-Fi
or
cellular
access.
So
for
things
that
are
cellular
frequencies,
they
typically
are.
C
H
Goes
through
buildings
goes
through
people,
etc,
etc.
Millimeter
wave
systems
is
a
lot
more
like
light,
which
I
mentioned
earlier
almost
like
lasers,
and
so
you
have
to
be
careful
about
pointing
it
in
a
certain
direction,
but
they
they
don't
like
light
they
don't
they
don't
they
don't
penetrate
so
we're
we
haven't.
We
didn't
invent
millimeter
waves
that
people
have
been
study
them
in
using
them
for
20-plus
years,
so
the
the
FCC
has
you
know,
rules
around
emissions
and
power,
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
H
D
Chair
if
I
could
I
just
wanted
before
you
go
to
comment,
respond
to
a
question
from
the
mayor
that
I've
gotten
a
little
more
additional
information
on,
if
that's
appropriate
sure.
So,
thanks
to
the
miracle
of
connectivity,
your
question
about
the
a
Wi-Fi
project
manager
I'd
actually
like
to
turn
it
over
to
rob
to
address
sort
of
the
timing
and
the
need
for
that
kind
of
a
level
of
support.
Rob.
So.
M
M
That
there's
some
pros
and
cons
of
that
could
also
be
nonprofits,
like
other
cities
have
done,
it's
like
Riverside
and
others,
or
there
could
be
a
some
other
partnership
that
could
emerge
but
somewhere
in
the
next
year,
because
of
that
time
frame,
we're
gonna
have
to
decide
that
I
would
actually
to
Kipp
say
that
that
funding
should
be
addressed
somewhere
along
the
lines
in
the
next
12
months,
but
the
mode
that
we
use
those
dollars
in
could
be
one
of
maybe
three
varieties.
So.
D
To
city
manager
bottom
line
it
yes
will
need
money
or
a
person
or
a
combination
of
both
in
order
to
be
able
to
manage
the
additional
complexity
that
goes
with
this
level
of
network
out
in
the
public.
It
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
be
a
body
in
house
and
it
might
not
might
that
might
not
be
the
best
answer,
but
we
need
somebody
somewhere
smart,
incapable
to
be
doing
more
of
this.
It's
not
just
a
another
duty
as
assigned
to
the
existing
network
engineers
yeah.
F
Good
afternoon
again,
Roxana
Marashi
education,
chair
of
the
San
Jose
silicon
valley's
n-double-a-cp,
as
I'm
listening
to
this
Facebook
paragraph
roll
out
and
hearing
that
it's
the
first
one
of
its
kind,
complete
rollout
in
a
city,
it's
concerning
to
me:
I,
looked
up
millimeter,
wave
technology
and
health
effects,
and
it
is
that
is
the
the
concern
of
the
this
kind
of
technology
that
you
can
look
it
up.
I
encourage
people
to
look
up
millimeter.
We
have
technology
and
health
effects.
Professor
from
UC
Berkeley
has
blog
on
these
concerns
and
has
written
extensively
about
it.
F
This
is
the
kind
of
technology
from
what
I
understand
that
we
can
opt
out
of
in
airports.
Pregnant
women
are
sometimes
recommended
to
opt
out
of
this
technology.
The
health
effects
have
not
been.
The
safety
has
not
been
determined,
it's
again
very
concerning
in
case
folks
missed
it
there,
because
we're
kind
of
in
a
Silicon
Valley
bubble.
There
is
a
very
massive
scandal
right
now
that
Facebook
Cambridge,
analytic,
--is
Mark
Zuckerberg,
is
going
to
be
in
the
House
committee
next
week.
There
was
an
apology,
for
you
know:
violations
of
public
trust.
It's
a
little
bit.
F
Surreal
to
be
here
and
to
hear
about
all
these
congratulations
and
everything
when
this
is
happening
in
the
outside
of
our
Silicon
Valley
bubble,
so
I
hope
that
we
can
take
a
critical
lens
and
understand
what
the
motives
are
for
this
kind
of
work
and
what
the
potential
risks
are,
especially
with
the
partners
that
are
being
celebrated.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
G
Hi
to
further
talk
about
the
ideas
of
Facebook
you're,
trying
to
create
a
relationship
with
Facebook
and
trying
to
talk
about
to
the
new
and
the
new
and
improved
Facebook
ideas.
I
was
really
disappointed
in
how
I
just
possibly
was
a
city
of
San
Jose
put
together.
The
presentation
that
I
looked
on
the
website
for
I
was
really
disappointed
with
the
president.
With
with
with
what
was
on
the
video
screen,
the
person
talked
about
it
nicely
in
his
place,
but
I
think
we,
you
know,
I
talk,
I
I
had
a
feeling
throughout
City
Hall.
G
It
doesn't
there's
a
nice
feeling
about
the
ideas
of
how
to
begin
to
think
about
fiber
optics
in
the
future
again
and
how
you
know:
cabling,
underground,
wiring
and
cabling,
and
all
that
stuff
and
there's
in
the
past,
there's
just
been
a
good
feeling
around
City
Hall
that
that's
a
nice
way
to
work
and
think
about
and
and
and
prepare
how
to
build
for
our
future
and
this
this
Facebook,
what
it
did
it
just
completely,
decimated
it
and
made
it
look
ridiculous.
You
you
tried
to
give
it
respect
and
talked
about
it
in
nice
terms.
G
So
thank
you
for
that,
but
I'm
really
disappointed
that
if
you're
going
to,
if
you
and
Facebook
are
working
on
such
a
fine
model
example
for
us,
you
know
we
have
to
talk
about
fiber
optics
in
the
future.
I
do
believe
it's
my
young
and
experienced
opinion.
You
know
that
that
is
the
future.
We
can't
continuously
rely
on.
You
know
5g
and
4G
microwave
technology,
RF
technology
to
you
to
save
us,
I
mean
I
I,
just
I
just
it
needs
to
be
talked
about
differently.
I
I
A
G
Hi
for
open
forum
I'd
like
to
thank
the
mayor.
He
nicely
asked
about
what
can
be
data
retention
policy
and
what
can
be
data
collection
policy.
He
framed
it
in
a
way
about
the
public
process
and
how
what
all
that's
going
to
entail
I
mean
that
could
have
a
privacy,
Commission
person
and
self
in
charge
of
that
which
would
be
nice.
How
to
relate
that
with
the
public
and
I
know
the
IPA
we've
talked
about
the
IPA,
doing
some
work
with
that,
possibly
yeah.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
that.
G
G
G
Councilman
yep,
that
you
know
you
asked
about
what
what
exactly
are
we
doing
with
IOT
and
it
just
it?
It
I
I
hope
you
can
have
that
report
prepared
for
say
May
or
June
May,
preferably
but
definitely
by
June,
because
you
had
planned
ideas
about
having
kind
of
a
roll
out
in
November
that
you
IOT
ideas,
what
we
weren't
ready
for
the
public
and
it
just
it's
time
to
invite
the
public
to
the
process
a
bit
more.
G
If
you
can
so
thank
you
for
that,
for
mentioning
it
and
finally,
about
the
big
belly,
I'm
very
worried
about
the
broadband
admission
process.
That
can
happen
with
those
big
bellies.
If
you
have
them
and
I
hope
you
can
keep
the
technology
and
and
the
surveillance
step
on
us
with
the
VTA
down
just
minimal.
Thank
you.
Thank
You
Blair
means.