►
From YouTube: JUN 17, 2020 | Station Area Advisory Group
Description
City of San José, California
Station Area Advisory Group of June 17, 2020
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=793548&GUID=AE3B70E1-178B-4319-99B8-E95A0C7ACCD6
A
B
C
B
And
just
the
note
again
hi
all
thank
you
so
much
for
joining
us
before
we
get
started
with
the
meeting
here.
I'm
gonna
ask
Kwan
and
Chamara
to
introduce
themselves.
There
are
Vietnamese
and
Spanish
interpreters
for
this
meeting
and
they'll
introduce
themselves,
and
let
folks
know
that
might
have
bowed
in
and
need
that
support
how
to
access
that
information.
So
Juan
I'll
start
with
you.
If
you
can,
please
introduce
yourself.
D
One
bath
oil
at
home
get
really
good
job.
We
have
nice,
no
bat
muniya
happen.
I.
Think
we're
see
boil
on
me
about
not
finding
it
number
ue
go.
Man
can't
go
bad
bad
John,
Pynchon,
resume
concoction
and
they're
charting
the
divine
scene,
quibec
jang,
taejeong
kou!
No
man
can
come
get
me
anything
bear
come
on,
go
away
from
catching
on.
I,
know
bat
moon,
cheer,
ser
yourself
come
kite
sin
moolam,
youkai,
Bangkok,
Jang,
Hyuk,
naam,
yoga
woman.
Are
you
e
man,
honey,
kwok-hung
sow,
sow
Jin,
Chen,
didn't
I,
go
bad.
D
C
We
had
to
fully
activate
the
city's
emergency
response
operation,
closed
public
facilities,
figure
out
how
to
keep
the
essential
services
running,
and
fortunately
that
meant
that
we
had
to
cancel
public
meetings,
including
this
sag
meeting
that
was
planned
for
April
and
I.
Just
want
you
to
know
our
staff
team
pivoted
I
hate
that
word.
It's
overused
change
changed
course
very
rapidly
and
and
really
wanted
to
share
the
important
information
they
had
been
developing
about
development
capacity,
about
parks
about
transportation.
C
So
they
recorded
the
information
and
videos
and
posted
that
online
and
and
completed
an
online
survey
and
posted
that
online.
Our
intent
was
to
keep
the
information
flowing
and
to
continue
to
solicit
input,
even
though
we
couldn't
meet
in
person.
I
want
to
acknowledge
that
we
received
feedback
from
some
of
you
that
it
was
not
comfortable
to
receive
such
important
information
by
video.
C
You
know
when
we
couldn't
really
discuss
it
or
and
ask
an
answer
question
so
so
this
evening
we
are
going
to
review
the
highlights
of
that
content
and
we'll
have
plenty
of
time
for
questions
and
and
discussion,
and
so
I
just
want
to
recognize
that
meeting
virtually
is
not
ideal,
but
I.
Ask
for
your
patience
and
we
welcome
suggestions
for
improvement.
We're
really
committed
to
making
this
as
effective
as
possible,
because
it's
how
we're
going
to
need
to
do
public
meetings,
at
least
for
the
foreseeable
future.
C
C
In
April,
so
shout
out
to
Lou
if
by
any
chance,
she's
watching
and
while
Lori
is
out
on
maternity
leave,
I
really
want
to
thank
Tim,
Roode
and
Jose
rano
from
planning,
along
with
our
consultants,
from
plan
to
place
and
Rae
me
for
stepping
in
to
manage
the
civic
engagement,
work
and
you'll
hear
more
about
plans
for
civic
engagement,
the
second
half
of
the
year
and
then
last
but
not
least,
I
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
Norma
Camacho.
Who
I
see
is
here
with
us
this
evening.
C
I
want
to
thank
her
her
service
with
water
district
and
for
taking
the
work
of
this
group
and
her
membership
in
it
so
seriously
from
day
one
so,
just
from
the
bottom
of
our
hearts.
Norma
you've
been
an
inspiration
to
me
to
Nancy
I
know
to
many
others
as
a
public
servant
as
a
woman
public
servant
and
we're
deeply
appreciative
of
the
mark.
You've
left
on
San
Jose
and
and
send
you
off
with
the
warmest
of
wishes,
so
Thank
You
Norma,
and
we
can
all
clap
virtually.
Thank
you
very
much.
C
So
we
have
the
slides
here
and
I,
don't
know
if
you
can
see
most
of
them.
If
you
can,
if
you
can
just
like
raise
your
hand,
so
we
have
Nancy
Klein
from
the
Office
of
Economic
Development,
and
then
we
have
the
full
planning
team,
so
Rosalyn
Huey
who's,
a
director
Robert
Manford,
the
deputy
director
Tim
Ruud
who's,
the
Planning
Division
manager,
John
too,
who
is
a
planner
for
Jose
Ruano,
who
is
planner
too,
and
James
Hahn
who's,
planner,
Jose
and
James
have
been
integral
to
this
work.
C
Nicole
Burnham,
deputy
director
from
parks,
is
here
from
DoD.
We
have
Jessica
zank,
the
deputy
director,
ramzes
madhu
division
manager,
Eric
Idle
in
the
station
planning
manager
and
our
team
from
housing,
jackie
miranne,
the
director
and
Kristen
Clemens,
the
housing
division
manager
and,
of
course,
you
know,
Dave
our
friendly
facilitator
and,
thank
you
too
said:
hallo
secand,
who's
done
so
much
work
and
also
to
Diana
Benitez
who's
here
with
matt
raney
representing
Rainey
and
associates,
so
welcome
everybody
to
the
meeting
and
and
thanks
to
everybody
who
are
making
this
possible
today.
B
B
Know
that's
a
fantastic
question.
I
was
thinking
about
doing
that,
but
considering
there's
38
folks
there
on
the
group
I
thought
that
would
take
up
a
huge
chunk
of
time.
So
I
have
my
staff
that
are
quickly
identified
actually
with
us
and
and
noting
that
unless
you
all
really
would
like
to
take
a
role,
we
can
do
that
as
well.
Whatever
I'm
open
to
suggestions,
I
was
hoping
just
to
save
that
time.
If
we
can,
would
you
like
to
take
roll
Kathy,
I.
B
Let's
do
that
then,
let's
see
if
I
don't
have
the
full
list
in
front
of
me,
unfortunately,
but
we
can
go
down
the
list
of
who
we
see
here
in
the
participant
window.
I
think
that
might
be
the
easiest.
Unless
suheyla
do
you
have
the
list
that
you
can
pull
up
quickly
and
just
run
down
the
list
for
me,
ideal.
F
B
G
I
F
G
A
F
B
E
F
E
F
P
B
Okay,
that
was
great
great,
to
hear
voices
and
see
your
faces,
and
thank
you
for
that
reminder
kevin.
Definitely
before
each
of
you
speak
like
we
would
typically
do
it
assad
meetings.
If
you
could,
let
us
know
your
name
and
your
affiliation.
That
would
be
great.
We've
also
gotten
the
practice,
if
you
all
are
up
for
it
to
actually
change
your
name
with
your
affiliation
after
your
name,
it's
really
easy
to
do
on
the
top
right
hand
corner
of
your
screen.
B
B
B
Are
on
it
Kevin
as
usual?
Thank
you.
So
do
we
have
a
second
second
excellent?
Who
is
that
that
seconded
edward
found
with
HIPAA
edward?
Thank
you
so
much
excellent.
Thank
you
all
so
efficient!
Okay
on
we
go.
So
these
are
the
sog
agreements
and
by
the
way,
folks,
if
I'm,
looking
away
from
the
camera,
it's
another
I'm
losing
attention,
but
I
have
a
couple
screens
up
just
trying
to
keep
track
of
you
all
so
I
look
away!
B
That's
why
I'm
looking
away
but
I
have
now
looking
at
the
saga
view
I've
seen
this
before
I
mean
we've
done
a
great
job
of
being
respectful
of
each
other
understanding.
There's
multiple
perspectives,
really
creating
that
safe
space
that
we
can
all
communicate
with
each
other
efficiently,
putting
in
each
other's
putting
ourselves
in
each
other's
shoes
again,
just
recognizing
that
we're
coming
at
this
from
multiple
perspectives,
we're
all
looking
toward
the
same
general
goal
and
then
ultimately
like
I,
always
like
to
say,
have
fun.
It's
so
great
to
see
you
all!
B
B
Next
to
your
name,
letting
me
know
that
you
would
like
to
make
a
comment,
or
you
have
a
question
and
then
I'll
ask
you
to
unmute
yourself
and
do
that
at
that
point,
if
you've
called
in
as
well,
you
could
do
the
same
function
through
the
star
nine
feature
in
terms
of
public
engagement
as
well.
We
will
have
a
good
chunk
of
time
for
public
comment
as
I
mention
earlier,
and
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
kind
of
timing
for
that
and
the
council
meetings
are
run.
B
We
also
just
want
to
note
that
we've
accepted
electronic
comments,
both
at
our
emailed
to
us
and/or
through
the
project
website.
That
will
be
public
record
and
all
that
this
meeting
is
being
recorded,
which
we
forgot
to
mention
earlier
and
on
this
meeting
and
the
summary
will
be
posted
to
the
project
website
as
well,
so
keep
an
eye
out
for
that
and
then,
in
terms
of
public
comment
running
exactly
the
same
way,
it
looks
like
we
got
some
good
practice
around
that
as
well.
B
You
see
a
lot
of
time
to
provide
your
comment,
and
so
it
looks
like
it
should
be
fairly
simple.
That
way,
again,
if
you
do
call
in
you,
can
do
that
dial
a
star
nine
and
I'll
pop
up
to
let
you
know
and
then
lastly,
for
those
that
are
watching
this
through
the
public
channel,
we
just
wanted
to
flash
the
meeting
ID
information
on
the
screen,
I'm
realizing
though
unfortunately,
I'll
get
the
right,
ID
information
on
here.
B
N
N
N
The
usual
process,
where
all
the
buildings
are
completely
designed
and
go
through
the
approval
process
as
complete
building
designs,
is
proposed
to
be
a
different
process
where
and
the
council
would
approve
the
design
standards
and
guidelines
document
as
well.
As
you
know
these
to
submit
all
documents,
development
agreement,
but
the
D
WDSU
is
really
a
key
piece
of
the
story
of
what
the
downtown
West
development
will
look
and
feel
and
act
like.
It
also
relates
to
the
environmental
impact
report,
in
that
some
of
the
design
standards
could
help
to
mitigate
environmental
impacts.
N
So
the
team
felt
it
was
very
important
for
those
to
be
issued
together
for
public
review
and
we've
been
working
very
hard
staff
with
Google
and
everyone's
consultants
to
review
a
couple
different
drafts
of
the
environmental
impact
report,
as
well
as
draft
above
the
design,
standards
and
guidelines.
So
the
public
version
of
all
those
again
anticipated
to
be
released
on
August
25th.
N
We
are
also
planning
a
an
initial
Planning
Commission
study
session
on
September
9th.
This
will
cover
both
the
downtown
West
project
and
the
D
sap.
Since
we'll
have
a
couple
of
new
commissioners
coming
online,
it
will
be
a
good
opportunity
to
begin
the
process
of
orienting
them
and
then
your
next
meeting
we're
currently
looking
at
dates
in
September.
N
We
wanted
to
give
the
song
in
the
community
a
little
time
to
review
these
fairly
lengthy
and
technical
documents,
that
draft
environmental
impact
report
and
the
design
standards
and
guidelines,
so
we're
planning
a
September,
stag
meeting
and
I
should
note
that
all
of
the
assualt
meetings-
we're
anticipating,
are
not
shown
on
this
slide.
So
don't
think
that
September
is
going
to
be
the
only
one
I'll
note
the
other
ones
as
we
get
to
them
at
the
timeline.
N
Eis
West
project
would
then
fall
in
October,
October
9th,
and
that
is
also
when
October
is
when
we
are
now
looking
to
issue
a
draft
of
the
updated
during
on
station
area
plan.
So
in
terms
of
SOG
meetings
throughout
the
rest
of
this
year,
as
I
mentioned,
we're
anticipating
one
in
September,
we're
also
anticipating
one
more
in
2020
toward
the
end
of
the
year,
probably
after
the
draft
deset
document
has
been
issued
so
looking
at
maybe
November
or
early
December,
and
then
we'll
also
have
another
side
meeting
early
in
2021.
N
So
if
you
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
so
looking
into
the
first
part
of
2021
in
February,
we're
anticipating
that
the
city
would
finalize
the
e
ir
resolution
and
staff
report.
We'd
have
Planning
Commission
hearing
on
the
downtown
West
project
in
the
D
sap
in
March
and,
if
possible,
also
a
City
Council
first
reading
in
March
and
a
second
reading
final
adoption
April.
So
it's
it's
taken
a
lot
of
work
to
kind
of
rejigger
our
work
process
to
be
working
remotely
and,
of
course,
the
community
engagement
is
the
hardest
part
to
do
remotely.
N
B
N
So
the
D
SAP
will
have
an
environmental
evaluation,
the
one
second
please
it
won't
necessarily
be
an
EAJA.
It
might
be
an
addendum
to
the
downtown
strategy
ir.
So
the
technical
analysis
is
proceeding
on
that
and
the
environmental
documents,
whatever
form
it
takes,
will
be
made
available
for
public
review.
N
Even
though
that's
that's
not
technically
required
for
an
addendum.
That's
always
been
the
city's
practice,
so
I
won't
go
through
everything
on
this
slide,
but
I
just
wanted
to.
You
know
start
by
saying
that
the
work
that
staff
and
the
consultants
have
been
doing
since
your
last
meeting
is
really
designed
to
you
know,
build
on
and
take
into
account
all
the
community
engagement.
That's
been
going
on
for
this
area
over
the
many
many
years,
including
you
know,
the
meetings
we
had
in
person
last
fall.
N
So
these
are
all
great
input
and
statements
of
community
values
and
priorities
that
we're
bringing
into
the
work
as
we
proceed
to
get
more
into
the
details,
and
so
this
is
just
kind
of
some
of
the
flavor
of
the
input
that
we
got
throughout
all
of
those
processes
and
what
we
did
with
it.
So
you
can
see
on
the
right.
You
know
we
got
comments
like
this
is
an
opportunity
to
increase
Heights
and
plan
to
maximize
housing
as
the
best
years.
N
So
we've
looked
at
analyzed
the
potential
development
capacity
increases
in
the
area
I'm,
taking
into
account
the
council's
direction
on
airport
Heights,
as
well
as
city
policies
for
jobs,
housing
balance,
and
then
you
know
we
also
got
questions
about.
What's
the
city's
plan
for
the
rest
of
the
area
beyond
the
Google
crotch,
how
much
capacity,
how
many
wrestling
residential
units?
What
will
the
traffic
look
like,
so
that's
work
that
we
did
in
putting
together
the
estimated
development
build-out
capacity
high-end
estimate
that
we're
using
in
the
modeling
and
analysis?
H
N
Of
the
comments
in
red
on
the
right,
you
know
we
got
comments
like
activity.
24/7
have
eyes
on
this,
three
recognize
the
balance
of
use.
It's
not
just
office,
so
the
Atlanta
land
use
concept
approach
that
we
put
out
for
discussion.
Actually,
it's
more
mixed-use
than
the
2014
DSM.
It
puts
homes
and
offices
closer
together
in
more
areas
than
the
2014
d
set
did,
which
allows
for
a
potential
increase
in
walking
or
biking
or
other
low-impact
way
to
travel
that
are
more
sustainable
and
have
lower
carbon
emissions.
N
We
also,
you
know,
have
heard
a
lot
about
building
heights,
including
you
know,
references
stated
for
shorter
heights
near
creeks
and
existing
neighborhoods
for
compatibility.
So
we've
looked
at
that
we
know
not.
Everyone
is
satisfied
with
the
initial
proposal
and
we're
continuing
to
work
on
that,
and
we
also
looked
at
opportunities
to
expand
the
bound.
So
we
got
comments.
You
know
some
folks
wanted
to
expand
the
DISA
Ann
Marie,
all
the
way
to
highway.
87
and
280.
N
Other
folks
saw
an
opportunity-
and
we
just
got
a
letter
about
this
day
or
two
ago
from
the
Park
Conservancy
seem
obviously
sorry
about
my
dog
an
opportunity
to
improve.
Let's
guess
is
what
I
look
paper
for
trail
connections,
so
you
know,
we've
we've
made
some
initial
proposals,
we're
certainly
going
to
be
meeting
and
talking
and
thinking
more
all
of
the
input
that
we're
getting
as
we
continue
to
work
toward
getting
a
draft
together
that
we
can
put
out
for
community
discussion
and
so
getting
back
to
engagement.
N
So
going
forward
has
over
100
our
deset
project
manager
and
other
staff
involved
in
the
DS
app,
including
some
from
d-o-t
parks,
are
planning
to
be
available
at
least
one
hour
a
week
between
them
to
answer
questions
on
the
dirt
on
station
area
plan,
so
we'll
get
those
scheduled
and
get
notified.
It'll
probably
be
different
times
different
weeks
to
try
to
make
more
opportunities
for
people
to
check-in
and
that'll
just
be
kind
of
an
informal
kind
of
chat,
room
or
virtual
office
hours
and
then,
as
far
as
community
meetings.
So
again
you
know.
N
There
are
a
lot
of
folks
working
behind
the
scenes
on
these
virtual
meetings
so
again
we're
planning
to
host
community
meetings
on
visa
and
West
in
September
and
October,
and
then
also
wanted
to
mention
that
Google
is
planning
to
post
six
recorded
videos
about
their
project
and
they
have
actually
already
posted
the
first
one.
So
those
are
available
on
their
project
website,
which
is
gqo
or
GCO,
slash,
San,
Jose
and
there's
a
lot
of
content
on
there.
N
But
if
you
scroll
down
to
explore
updates,
you
will
find
their
latest
update
posted
in
June,
which
has
a
link
to
a
YouTube
video
that
tells
how
they
used
the
content
of
the
community
engagement
that
they
heard
in
their
permit
assigned
for
the
project
and
so
they'll
be
I.
Think
playing
five
more
of
those
coming
through
the
rest
of
the
summer
and
then
again,
Google
hosted
community
meetings
online
or,
if
possible,
in
person
also
anticipated
in
September
or
October,
and
that
was
my
last
slide.
B
Q
To
say
how
wonderful
it
is
to
get
to
be
with
you
this
evening.
It
feels
like
a
little
bit
of
opening
up
for
us
to
all
be
able
to
go
forward
and
work
on
something
other
than
strictly
Kove
a'dreea
activities.
So
thank
you
and
wonderful
to
be
together.
I
wanted
to
give
you
a
brief
update
on
the
development
of
the
development
agreement
over
the
past
six
months
as
Tim
just
shared
with
you,
staff
has
been
working
on
a
number
of
critical
documents.
Q
In
addition
to
the
EIA
are
the
DSG
that
designs
standards
and
guidelines,
as
Tim
mentioned
subsequent
transportation
infrastructure
all
of
those
documents
working
through
the
development
program.
So
so
that's
what
we've
been
trying
to
do
as
a
team
understand
what's
what's
intended
and
what
impacts
what
in
terms
of
the
overall
design
circulation?
Q
All
of
that
to
determine
how
we
value
the
project
overall,
first,
you
really
have
to
have
a
grasp
of
the
scenarios
of
what
it
is
or
could
be,
and
then
that
can
lead
us
along
the
path
to
deliver
strategies
for
how
the
benefits
might
be
delivered
to
the
community.
So,
as
that
all
takes
shape,
we
are
looking
together
to
analyze
the
value
of
the
city's
legislative
actions
and,
if
you
don't
mind
the
next
slide.
Q
Thank
you.
It's
a
reminder
that
since
December
4th
of
2018
in
the
memorandum
of
understanding,
it
was
clear
that
there
will
be
a
development
agreement
and
community
benefits
established
by
sharing
a
portion
of
the
value
created
through
the
city's
legislative
actions
and
that
the
MOU
also
calls
for
this
city
to
be
aware
of
project
feasibility.
Q
So
I,
just
we
haven't
been
together
for
quite
some
time,
so
I
just
wanted
to
go
back
to
that
most
fundamental
of
documents,
and
if
you
can
go
on
to
the
next
slide
and-
and
here
is
a
list
of
most
of
anyway,
the
the
legislative
acts
that
were
thinking
through
so
an
increase
in
development
capacity
and
certainly
embedded
in
that
is
the
one
engine
inoperable
or
higher
heights.
That
we've
worked
on
together.
General
plan
and
zoning
changes
that
may
takes
place.
Q
Street
vacations
that
may
arise
parking
reductions
which
can
accomplish
many
goals,
but
a
certain
amount
of
parking
is
needed
and
thinking
through
how
much
that
is.
As
mentioned,
the
design,
standards
and
guidelines
will
become
very
important
and
the
dese
act.
The
Deardon
station
area
plan
amendment
itself,
as
you
know,
working
through.
Q
What's
the
environmental
approach
and
what
does
the
dese
app
itself
include
and
then
the
development
of
the
development
agreement
next
slide,
please
so
I
wanted
to
just
refresh
the
community
benefit
priorities
from
City
Council
remain:
affordable
housing,
the
displacement
prevention
and
community
stabilization,
including
the
preservation
and
protection
of
homes
and
jobs
and
education.
We
know
that
the
sug
has
additional
priorities.
We
don't
are
ignoring
those
just
referencing
the
three
priority
issues
or
areas
from
City
Council
David.
Q
Understanding.
These
things
takes
a
good
bit
of
work
and
the
way
these
actually
evolve
lead
to
what
is
the
value
of
the
legislative
actions
and,
if
you'd
go
on
to
the
next
and
I
wanted
to
bring
this
slide
back,
because
I
think
it's
important.
We
had
use
brought
this
to
your
attention
before
public
benefits.
Well,
we
believe
come
from
a
number
of
different
stages,
phases
and
processes
when
the
project
fulfills
its
baseline
requirements,
say
for
Complete
Streets.
Certainly
that
will
contain
at
least
a
good
chunk
of
public.
Q
The
benefit
the
area
not
only
for
transportation
and
circulation,
but
be
done
in
such
a
way
that
is
more
environmentally
friendly
than
we've
done.
Streets
in
the
past.
They'll
also
be
negotiated.
Community
benefits
and
those
things
are
in
those
areas,
as
mentioned
from
council
and
potentially
additional
areas
of
community
benefits,
as
specified
by
the
stationary
Advisory
Group
and
the
community.
And
then
there
will
be
google
project
features
which
are
things
above
and
beyond.
Q
In
early
2021
we
will
also
be
updating
as
I'm
sharing
with
you
now
updates
at
future
meetings.
We
don't
know
exactly
the
pace
we'll
be
working
on,
but
certainly,
as
you
see,
the
last
bullet
council
will
be
reviewing
the
approvals
in
March
or
April,
so
will
need
to
be
probably
in
February
and
March
to
you
or
March
for
the
full
DA
review
at
the
sod.
So
with
that,
that
concludes
my
presentation
and
again,
thank
you
very,
very
much.
B
Thank
you
so
much
Nancy.
So,
as
we
mentioned
earlier
at
the
end
of
each
one
of
these
segments
of
the
presentations,
we're
gonna,
stop
and
hopefully
hear
from
you
all
any
questions,
comments
that
you
might
have
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
actually
stop
sharing
the
screen
so
that,
hopefully
you
all
have
some
more
real
estate
on
your
screen
to
be
able
to
see
each
other.
B
F
I
Even
obviously,
thank
you,
everybody
for
the
presentation,
it's
a
vast
scope
to
cover
in
under
ideal
situation,
and
this
is
obviously
not
an
ideal
situation
or
the
return
back
partially
to
what
Harvey
had
said.
The
DS
app
is
far
too
vast
to
be
fused
as
an
addendum
to
dir.
The
arena
was
a
fall
far
smaller
undertaking
and
it
benefited
from
both
the
arena.
Oversight
Committee
during
the
process
and
the
arena
Authority
for
after
the
fact
the
dese
app
is
done
properly,
is
a
once-in-a-generation
undertaking
and
needs
to
be
taken
more
seriously
than
an
addendum.
I
Tdc
e
needs
to
direct
the
Historic
Preservation
officer,
along
with
the
required
staff
and
resources
to
focus
HRI
updates
on
the
dirt
on
station
area,
as
we
saw
at
yesterday's
City
Council
meeting
waiting
until
there's
a
specific
pending
development
under
consideration
makes
it
all
too
easy
to
marginalize
and
existing
structures.
Historic
importance
and
much
beneath
the
banner
of
progress
to
authorize
the
demolition
of
documented
historic
resources
that
meet
multiple
requirements
for
city
landmark
status.
While
this
is
legally
allowed,
it's
far
from
best
practices
and
seems
custom
designed
as
an
end
run
around
any
thoughtful
consideration.
R
Hello,
this
is
Robert,
might
further
Deputy
Director
for
planning
ed
with
your
question
is
twofold,
so
I'd
like
to
answer
the
historic
preservation
component
of
it
as
part
of
both
the
Google
project
and
the
D
sub
surveys
are
being
conducted
and
those
surveys,
the
results
of
those
service,
will
be
included
in
the
history.
The
city's
history
resources
inventory.
So
there
is
no
state
convention
over
there
when
regards
to
the
D
subsequent,
which
so
far
studies
are
being
conducted
that
could
result
in
EDA
and
a
ir
or
an
addendum
to
the
downtown
strategy.
R
Please
note
that
it
P
sub
boundaries
are
located
within
the
downtown
strategy
area
for
which
an
EAJA
was
prepared
just
over
a
year
ago
about
a
year
half,
and
that
is
the
planning
documents.
The
D
sup
is
also
a
planning
documents.
So
the
fact
that
it's
located
within
the
geographic
boundaries
of
the
downtown
strategy
and
the
fact
that
we
have
a
fresh
well
prepared
er,
we
don't
want
our
where
to
be
monotonous.
We
already
know
there
is
a
big
projects
there
Google
project,
which
is
undergoing
its
own
sequel
review.
R
We
also
know
that
there
are
a
lot
of
projects
that
are
lined
up
within
the
D
sub
area:
s
immediate
environs.
Each
development
projects
that
comes
in
will
be
evaluated
within
the
context
of
the
cipa
document
that
is
being
prepared,
which
is
the
planning
documents.
So
what
I
do
the
appropriate
secret
ultraman's
will
be
prepared?
We
don't
know
the
specifics
of
each
project
and
if
we
are
going
to
try
to
clear
every
project
where
that
AI
R
is
going
to
be
meaningless
because
the
projects
will
come
in
and
each
one
is
unique.
R
I
Now,
if
you
wait
until
development
proposals
are
there
as
the
council
members
and
as
the
staff
members
made
clear
at
the
meeting
yesterday,
we
don't
want
to
interfere
with
this
specific
project.
So
no
we're
not
going
to
grant
this
status.
They
need
to
be
looked
at
separately.
So,
therefore,
before
development
of
those
individual
buildings
come
through.
B
I'm,
just
real
quick
I
see
members
of
the
public
also
raising
their
hands.
We
appreciate
that
that
will
be
opportunity.
I'm
toys
there
in
the
meeting
for
public
comment
feel
free
to.
Let
me
know
that
you
do
have
public
comment
and
we'll
keep
track
of
that.
But
for
now
we're
going
to
keep
going
through
the
SOG
discussion
and
Geoffrey
I
see
you
had
your
hand
Geoffrey.
F
We
can
with
working
partnerships
us
a
fancy,
appreciated
the
the
presentation
of
the
OP
day
upon
where
we
are
with
the
development
agreement.
I
think
when
we
last
spoke
in
January,
we
were
looking
at
a
late
April
council
study
session
and
I
think
we
had
had
some
quite
some
discussion
about
providing
information.
F
I
think
it
was
supposedly
an
info
memo
that
would
come
out
preceding
that
study
session
on
the
initial
findings
from
HR
na
as
to
answering
some
of
those
questions
about
the
financial
value
of
those
legislative
decisions
going
into
some
of
the
negotiations
around
community
benefits.
So
just
wondering
if
you
can
share
any
update
on
on
where
h
rnase
analysis
is
and
when
we
might
be
able
to
see
that
information,
whether
it's
in
an
info
memo
or
otherwise
and.
C
I
was
the
one
that
had
made
that
commitment
to
council
member
of
Perales
and
then
what
we
said
was
that
in
the
study
session,
we
would
be
sharing
any
insights
that
we
had
related
to
the
value
capture
and
the
economics
of
the
of
the
project.
So
we
would
be
doing
that
in
the
context
of
that
September
study
session.
B
Thank
You
Kim
I
mean
also
actually
request
just
so
everyone
knows
everyone,
including
members
of
public,
one
city
staff.
When
we
speak
up,
let's
also
let
everyone
know
who
we
are
just
to
make
it
easy
for
everyone
to
track.
Thank
you
so
much
for
that
Kim
I'm.
So
with
that
we'll
move
to
Kevin
you're
up,
if
you
can
go
I
know
me
yourself.
K
K
K
Economic
downturn
around
what
2008
and
it's
been
in,
reuse
and
I'd
like
to
see
before
we
have
any
more
community
centers,
be
built
that
gardeners
Center
is
open
full-time
in
in
connection
with
that,
with
all
the
housing
that's
going
to
be
going
in
over
in
the
SAP
area,
we
need
to
figure
out
a
better
way
of
getting
the
children
safely
across
to
82.
The
gardener,
Academy
and
I
know
that
last
week
there
was
about
a
four-hour
discussion
about
how
to
get
children
safely
across
880
from
the
Charcot
development
over
there
by
87
and
I.
S
B
Kevin
sorry
I
don't
mean
to
cut
you
off
Kevin,
but,
and
we
have
a
full
kind
of
discussion
around
each
one
of
these
components
coming
up
as
part
of
the
presentation,
I'd
love,
to
give
a
little
background
for
folks,
including
the
survey
results
before
we
dive
into
that
I'm,
happy
to
let
the
team,
maybe
if
they
have
any
initial
response
of
that.
To
do
that
now.
I
mean
I,
really
appreciate
this
topic.
We
want
to
give
it
plenty
of
time.
K
B
G
Is
Jessica
Sanka,
deputy
director
for
d-o-t
and
I?
Think
we've
certainly
heard
Kevin.
Thank
you
for
that.
You've
definitely
heard
the
concerns
about
crossing
280
at
Byrd
over
the
years,
and
it's
one
of
those
key
reasons
that
it's
one
of
the
five
initial
ideas
that
we
have
for
a
critical
component
of
the
update
to
the
D
SEP
2
bicyclist
crossing
over
280
at
Byrd,
and
so
just
just
as
Dave
said,
we'll
definitely
get
into
that.
G
B
J
Thanks
very
much
David
Meyer
from
Silicon
Valley
at
home
I
just
want
to
thank
Tim
for
his
overview
of
kind
of
how
the
schedule
is
being
read.
I
know
is
a
massive
undertaking
to
try
to
figure
it
out
and
to
try
to
to
make
it
work.
One
thing
I
was
just
curious
about
on
that
schedule.
Is
that,
because
of
the
de
SAP
being
pushed
pushed
out
several
months,
I
was
curious.
If
that
delay
is
gonna,
have
an
impact
of
any
plans
that
have
already
been
submitted
or
already
in
initial
review.
N
Sure
so
I
mean
the
plans
under
review
are
being
reviewed
under
current
policies
and
while
we've
had
interest
from
applicants
in
trying
to
kind
of
pre
clear
a
project
assuming
that
stay
pipe
limits
in
the
DISA
change,
you
know
we're
that's
something
that
we're
gonna
have
to
work
closely
with
applicants
on,
because
you
know
we
in
development
review.
We
have
to
go
by
what's
currently
on
the
books.
We
can't
sort
of
pre
approve
I,
don't
believe
we
can
prove
a
project
contingent
on
the
council,
making
it
legislative
act
in
the
future.
J
D
Hi
Rosalyn
Huey,
director
of
planning,
building
in
code
enforcement
and
Tim,
you
answered
it
perfectly.
Nothing
to
add
Tim
is
absolutely
correct.
Any
development
proposals
that
we
currently
have
on
hand
are
reviewing
will
have
to
comply
the
current
policies
and
plan
in
place.
However,
obviously
applicants
you
know
they
could
decide
to
wait
until
after
the
DISA
amendment
is
approved,
anticipated
in
the
spring.
B
A
Thank
You
Darnell
North,
Willow,
Glen,
Neighborhood
Association,
also
on
General
Plan,
Update
task
force
and
I'm
concerned
that
you're
going
to
try
to
bring
a
significant,
larger
number
of
housing
units
into
this
area
without
a
fully
I.
Are
you
have
raised
the
height
limits
considerably
in
this
area
and
I
think
it
changes
the
character
of
the
plan
that
you
approved
last
year,
whatever
it
was
called,
I
forgotten,
the
name
and
I
think
we
need
more
than
just
an
addendum.
A
We
need
a
process
that
that
has
full
public
outreach
and,
by
the
way
on
the
public,
outreach
I'm
not
going
to
be
critical
of
the
groups
that
you
have
shown
in
your
presentation,
they're
good
groups,
but
they
are
not
immediately
present
around
this
z-zap
area.
There
are
seven
or
eight
neighborhood
associations
that
have
joined
together
to
form
the
dang
group,
because
we
feel
that
we
have
not
been
heard
and
I
think
that
we
need
to
do
a
more
robust
community
process
that
would
be
required
under
a
draft
dir.
A
So
that's
one
thing
appreciate
that
for
me,
so
I'm
concerned
about
and
and
I
think
that
we
also
need
a
working
group.
It
had
suggested
of
community
leaders
in
the
immediate
area
to
help
this
process
both
up
to
the
point
where
the
d
sap
is
approved,
and
also
afterwards
in
the
implementation
phase,
and
we've
done
that
with
the
arena
process
in
the
past
I
think
we
could
do
that
with
this
as
well.
It's
just
something
I'm
throwing
out
there
for
us
to
think
about.
A
A
B
We
definitely
want
to
allow
plenty
of
time
for
that
we'll
have
a
segment
after
each
one
of
those
major
components
to
talk
to.
So
thank
you
for
that
Tim,
our
team.
Did
you
wanna
respond
at
all
to
Harvey's
question
or
request
about
additional
outreach.
I
know
we
had
some
ideas
that
you
showed
earlier.
N
Well,
I
guess
I
would
just
you
know,
the
form
of
the
document
doesn't
determine
what
the
outreach
process
will
be.
The
city
has
committed
to
making
the
environmental
document
available
for
public
review,
whether
it's
requirements
and
the
outreach
process
for
the
plan
doesn't
really
also
what
type
of
environmental
document
it
is.
So
we've
met
with
doing
for
planning
and.
N
N
B
E
Hi
Kathy
Sutherland
of
the
dumbest
Park
Neighborhood,
Association
and
I
would
like
to
go
back
to
the
e
IR
and
the
change
that
was
made
in
our
neighborhood
when
downtown
expanded
West
to
the
Caltrain
station.
At
that
time,
when
the
downtown
boundaries
expanded
OVI
was
in
force,
and
there
was
nothing
that
was
going
to
be
developed
within
the
Domus
park-
boundaries
above
8
stories.
E
So
when
downtown
expanded,
the
thought
was,
we
can
easily
take
a
story's
we're
not
going
to
get
engaged
at
this
point
in
time,
but
in
the
middle
and
right
before
the
downtown
expansion
was
accrue,
council
decided
to
get
rid
of
oai,
which
changed
the
game
for
Delos
Park.
Now,
there's
a
map
out
that
has
heights
up
to
290
feet
within
these
boundaries
that
share
property
lines
with
single-family
homes.
E
We
need
a
full
AI
are
just
doing
an
addendum
and
the
light
work
that
it
takes
to
do
an
addendum
without
community
input
from
the
residents
who
are
going
to
be
affected
is
not
fair.
The
Oei
elimination
in
the
middle
of
approving
the
downtown
boundary
expansion
was
not
fair.
Dumbest
park
would
have
been
much
more
engaged
if,
if
we
had
known
that
alley,
I
was
going
to
go
away.
E
So
I
would
like
to
suggest
that
as
I've
been
told
that
the
deceptive
date
is
going
to
be
done
within
the
city
within
house
that
the
city
needs
to
look
at
working
with
the
neighborhood
partners
who
are
going
to
be
affected
by
the
D
SEP
update,
and
that
doing
something
in
house
is
not
a
way
to
create
a
good,
solid
document
that
everybody
can
support.
Doing
it
in
house
without
the
neighborhood
voice
is,
after
all,
the
time
and
effort
we've
all
put
into
our
neighborhoods,
to
make
them
great
and
to
understand
development.
E
So
we
can
welcome
development
ends
up
being
a
slap
in
the
face
so
from
my
neighborhood
and
from
our
partners.
Within
the
day
we
want
neighborhoods
to
be
engaged
in
the
deceptive
and
that
the
staff
city
staff
find
ways
to
communicate
with
us
present
things
to
us,
and
then
let
us
react
rather
than
having
something
posted
online.
That
is
on
a
video
platform.
B
Right
and
I
think
that
that
is
one
of
the
stakeholder
groups
for
sure
that
the
city
is
intending
to
engage
as
Tim
mentioned.
I
don't
know
if
city
staff
wants
to
add
to
that,
but
we
we
definitely
hear
where
you're
coming
from
Kathy
and
the
city
is
very
much
open
to
and
is
planning
to
have
those
conversations
with
your
group.
But
we
also
you're,
saying
DISA
communication
opportunities
as
we
want
to
open
it
up
to
others
as
well.
B
D
51
and
being
that,
we
are
right
up
against
that
border.
D
SAP
plan,
I
I,
to
agree
with
that
I
think
with
additional
outreach.
Please
include
us
not
I!
Think
an
addendum
can
be
overlooked
and
I
see
it
in
the
Department
of
Transportation
video
just
that
primary
bike
way
and
pathway
leading
from
east-west
it
kind
of
ends
right
at
us,
so
I,
I,
think
being
that
word
ground,
zero
right
there
up
against
that
boundary,
I
think
we
need
more
information,
so
I'm
on
board
with
that.
Thank
you
thank.
B
K
Yeah
I
just
wants
to
chime
in
that
I
I
think
we
need
a
working
group
because
the
decisions
that
are
made
from
this,
the
residents
of
these
neighborhoods
have
to
live
with
the
results
of
the
of
what
is
done
forever,
because
once
you
have
a
building
of
whatever
height,
it
creates
a
shadow
or
a
mini
climate
that
we
have
to
live
with
forever.
And
we
need
to
be
in
on
the
beginning
of
this
decision
process
to
make
sure
that
the
neighborhood's
just
aren't
steamrolled
yeah.
B
B
E
Yes,
neighborhood
there
was
more
community
input
for
the
arena
30
years
ago,
then,
there's
been
for
this
later
latest
iteration
of
the
D
cell,
and
there
has
to
be
a
working
group
in
a
committee
comprised
of
members
of
the
community
going
forward
to
discuss
this.
If
this
is
the
biggest
project
San
Jose
has
ever
undertaken
and
just
doing
a
slapdash
approval
of
the
existing
dese
app
is
really
disrespectful
to
the
neighborhood's.
E
We
have
worked
really
well
with
the
city
on
many
projects.
Before
most
of
us,
the
Deardon
area
neighborhood
group
have
twenty
thirty
plus
years
of
engagement
with
the
city.
They
know
who
we
are.
They
know
we
work
well
with
others,
so
this
is
something
that
is
really
an
imperative
going
forward.
Thank
you.
A
Up
again,
so
a
piece
of
institutional
memory,
I,
remember
back
in
the
early
shows,
maybe
2004
or
whatever,
when
the
city
was
proposing
a
general
plan
amendment
to
extend
the
downtown
to
from
actually
was.
It
ended
at
87,
highway
87
and
oh,
don't
start,
maybe
at
the
yeah.
Okay,
sorry,
it's
it's
ended
highway
87
and
they
moved
it
to
the
rail
line.
The
Deardon
station
and
the
yupi
rail
line
and
I
called
up
Kathy.
Who
was
chair
of
the
dumbest
Park
nack
and
said.
A
B
A
Yeah
there
was
a
promise
made
back
then
to
the
Delmas
Park
neighborhood,
that
I
became
part
of
being
the
adjacent
nack,
so
I
became
very
aware
of
it
and
particularly
on
being
on
the
General
Plan
Update
cast
sports.
So
there
was
a
promise
made.
So
I
think
that
we
should
carry
forward
that
promise
very.
B
B
Very
importantly,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
present
back
to
you
all
the
great
results
that
we
got
from
this
survey
that
was
taken
as
well
as
giving
those
it
didn't
have
a
chance
to
see
the
videos
of
that
background
information,
some
of
those
key
takeaways
that
led
into
the
survey
and
the
results
themselves.
So
with
that
I'm
going
to
hand
it
over
to
Matt
Raney
from
our
consultant
team,
I'm
gonna
take
us
through
that
so
Matt
you're
on
thanks.
H
Dave
hi
everyone
nice
to
see
you
all
again
it
is.
It
is
definitely
odd
to
have
this
format
when
we
spend
so
much
time
together
in
person.
So
you
know
I,
guess
it's
better
better
than
than
the
alternative,
so
I'm
gonna
take
some
time
going
through
the
results
of
the
survey
and
just
hit
some
of
the
highlights.
As
you
all
know,
the
survey
was
was
online
for
approximately
a
month
and
was
based
on
some
videos.
H
If
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
so
I
think
we
just
want
to
acknowledge
again
that
the
engagement
process
that
we
had
identified
for
the
spring
was
was
modified
because
of
code.
So
we
were
all
set
to
have
the
meetings
to
have
engagement.
We
had
all
the
materials
prepared
and
then
coded,
and
so
we
we
had
to
scramble-
and
you
know,
city
staff
did
a
great
job
of
pulling
things
together,
but
what
we
ended
up
with,
because
there
is
so
much
information.
H
What
we
ended
up
doing,
as
you
know,
was
a
series
of
tropical
presentations
online
and
those
also
had
comments
associated
with
it
and
then
an
online
survey
and
again,
the
point
of
doing
this
work
was
to
write
an
update
of
everything
that
was
going
on
in
the
downtown
and
here
areas
and
also
to
address
some
specific
critical
questions
across
multiple
topic
areas.
So
the
online
survey
had
606
responses.
H
There
were
583
in
English,
I'm
10
in
Spanish
and
13
of
the
SOG
members
provided
comments.
Through
the
survey
all
materials
were
provided
in
English
and
Spanish.
There
were
multiple
rounds
of
outreach
to
try
and
get
as
many
people
as
we
could
to
participate
in
the
survey.
It
was
indeed
a
challenging
time
given
what
was
going
on
overall
with
kovat,
but
we
did
do
emails
to
community
members
through
the
email
database.
H
We
ask
you
all
to
reach
out
to
your
members,
make
calls
and
it
calls
and
emails
to
the
to
the
SOG,
and
so
we
also
extended
the
survey
because
we
want
to
make
sure
we
could
get
more
responses
from
this.
So
we
go
to
the
go
to
the
next
slide.
The
the
survey
really
asked
some
specific
questions
about
specific
topics.
H
It
wasn't
just
a
broad
survey
because
of
how
much
engagement
we
have
been
doing
and
how
many
conversations
we've
had
on
all
of
these
topics
and
all
of
these
overlapping
plans
that
have
been
going
on
for
a
while,
and
so
we
I'm
just
to
sort
of
show
the
relationship
here.
We,
the
one
of
the
major
activities,
is
amending
the
dese
app
and
there
were
questions
for
this
around
the
building.
H
Heights
the
amount
of
housing
and
the
amount
of
commercial
on
the
downtown
transportation
plan
is
going
on
and
currently
in
process,
and
so
there
were
questions
about
the
ideas
that
came
forth
that
were
being
proposed
in
the
transportation
plan
and
whether
they
were
exciting
for
the
area
or
concerning.
There
were
topics,
questions
related
to
community
services
and
facilities
and
predominantly
but
also
Parks
and
Recreation.
H
So,
there's
a
background
on
the
parks
and
recreation
presentation,
with
with
questions
really
related
to
the
variety
of
programs
and
services
that
could
be
offered
in
the
contest
having
a
community
center
in
the
v-rod
on
station
area,
and
the
this
also
impacts
the
the
Google
project
as
well.
The
responses
to
this
the
the
final
category
is
about
affordable
housing,
job
training
and
community
benefits.
The
city
is
currently
undertaking
affordable
housing
implementation
plan
and
then
the
Google
project
is
also
clearly
thinking
about
a
lot
of
these
topics
as
well,
and
so
this
information
from
mr.
H
Bay
is
feeding
into
those
two
plans
as
well,
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
overlapping
information.
That's
that's
going
on
here
in
terms
of
what
its
gonna
feed
into
there.
This
is
a
quick
breakdown
of
the
race
ethnicity,
of
the
survey.
Respondents
on
the
blue
is
the
people
who
responded.
The
survey
the
orange
here
is
the
city
of
San.
Jose
I
want
to
point
out
here
that
we
did
not
for
all
of
the
results.
H
We
did
not
include
13
SOG
members
and
we
really
only
focused
on
the
members
of
the
public
who
responded
to
the
survey,
but
we
will
identify
at
certain
places
the
consistency
between
the
SOG
and
the
and
the
public,
and
so,
as
we
can
see
here,
the
there
was
a
greater
percentage
of
white
respondents
compared
to
the
city
and
fewer
Hispanic,
Latino
and
Asian.
There
was
you
know.
H
H
We
also
looked
geographically
at
where
the
the
comments
the
respondents
came
from
and
essentially
the
majority
of
the
responses
came
from
three
zip
codes:
nine,
five,
one,
two,
six,
nine
five,
one:
two
five
and
nine
five
one
one
two
the
most
was
nine
five
one,
two
six
and
then
you
can
see
a
distribution
throughout
the
city
as
well,
and
there
are
even
people
from
the
entire
Bay
Area.
But
really
the
majority
of
third
came
from
these
three
zip
codes.
H
Okay.
So
now
I'm
going
to
go
through
the
different,
topical
areas
and
the
way
that
we're
going
to
work
this,
because
there's
so
much
information
here,
is
that
we're
going
to
give
a
little
bit
of
background
on
topic.
We're
not
going
to
essentially
repeat
the
information
that
was
in
the
in
the
videos,
but
just
give
a
real
high-level
overview
of
the
sort
of
the.
H
Why
provide
an
overview
of
the
survey
results
and
then
open
it
up
to
discussion
and
questions
from
the
SOG
members,
and
so
we'll
do
that
for
each
topic,
and
so
we're
going
to
need
to
move
our
way
through
these
topics.
I
mean
there's
five
different
points
that
we're
going
to
stop
and
have
conversations
so
starting
with
the
the
dirt
on
station
area
plan.
You
know
we
have
gone
into
this
already.
You
clearly
have
heard
the
concerns
from
the
lot
of
the
neighborhood
groups
about
the
plan
and
the
planning
process.
H
But,
as
you
all
know,
the
the
environment
has
changed.
Since
the
plan
was
adopted
in
2014,
there's
no
ball
park.
There
was
the
council
decision
for
allowing
greater
height
limits.
Recently
we
have
the
Bay
Area
housing
crisis,
going
on
the
rapid
expansion
of
jobs,
there's
more
clarity
on
the
transit
expansion
if
you're
at
on
station.
We
have
this
proposal
for
Google's
downtown
west
project
and
then
there's
also
all
of
these
studies
going
on
in
and
around
the
downtown,
and
all
of
this
information
needs
to
be
included
into
the
updated
Nnamdi
sap.
H
The
proposed
changes,
as
we
mentioned,
actually
a
lot
in
the
in
the
comments
and
questions
from
saag
members,
while
the
overall
vision
of
creating
a
walkable
mixed-use
place
has
remained
the
same.
There
are
certainly
some
changes
that
are
being
proposed,
including
expanding
the
plan
boundary.
A
modification
of
the
allowed
land
uses
with
actually
greater
mixing
of
those
uses,
an
increase
in
the
allowable
building
heights.
H
Due
to
the
change
in
in
oai
and
then
an
expansion
of
the
development
capacity
to
increase
the
amount
of
development,
that's
allowed
area
next
piece,
the
questions
that
were
asked
were
for
this.
This
topic
were
essentially
essentially
threefold,
so
it
was
really
essentially
thinking
about
the
building
heights,
the
building
height
map
and
the
building
heights
that
were
presented,
the
amount
of
housing
and
the
amount
of
commercial
development.
The
question
was
asked
about
whether
this
amount
of
development
and
the
building
Heights
was
about
right
far
too
high
or
far
too
low.
H
It
was
a
slightly
opposite
with
commercial
55
percent
said
about
right
and
then
26%
said
that
it
was
actually
there's
too
much
commercial
development,
meaning
there
should
be
more
residential
development
going
on
here,
and
the
SOG
members
came
up
with
about
the
same
responses
here
in
terms
of
a
preference
for
about
rent,
go
to
the
next
slide.
So
we're
gonna
pause
here
and
and
take
some
questions
again.
You
know
I
apologize,
given
the
amount
of
information.
H
B
Thank
you
Matt,
yes,
so
just
like
we've
been
doing,
and
you
will
all
have
proven
to
be
experts
at
we're,
gonna
use
the
hand
raised
function.
If
you
have
any
questions,
comments,
concerns
I
know
a
lot
of
you
already
had
a
chance,
especially
with
with
the
dese
app
itself,
to
provide
comments
and,
as
Matt
mentioned,
we're
gonna
next
move
into
transportation
parks
and
affordable
housing
as
well.
E
Don't
know
she
can
get
it
up
there,
but
but
one
of
the
things
that
we
colored
in
were
the
single-family
home
areas
and
the
areas
within
the
desal
that
have
single-family
homes
very,
very
minor
areas,
but
the
proposed
height
adjacent
to
those
single-family
homes
in
many
places,
is
over
250
feet.
So,
when
the
planning
to
Cartman
looks
at
developable
height,
we
would
like
them
to
consider
the
adjacent
buildings
and
not
just
look
at
how
tall
you
can
go.
How
high
is
appropriate
in
a
single-family
neighborhood?
How
high
is
it
appropriate
to
develop
there?
E
E
Think
when
we
talked
to
him
they
wanted
to
go
20
storeys
and
we
sent
in
the
letter
supporting
that.
So
we
are
not
anti
development.
We
do
think
density
needs
to
be
placed
in
the
appropriate
location
and
that
the
appropriate
location
is
determined
by
what
is
adjacent
to
the
site.
So
the
day
once
again
would
like
to
ask
for
a
decent
working
group,
and
then
we
would
also
like
to
ask
for
neighborhood
input,
as
the
d
set
gets
amended
in
the
whole
process,
not
as
outreach.
B
A
couple
Mike's
just
to
make
sure
that
doesn't
happen.
So,
okay,
they
just
want
to
ensure
you
that
we
did
actually
share
both
of
those
as
public
record
with
this
dog
it's
on
the
project
website,
so
that
will
be
included
in
the
summary
as
well.
So
thank
you
for
that
information
with
that
any
reactions
or
any
follow-up
comments
from
staff
on
those
requests.
Hi.
D
We
understand
that
the
neighbors
are
the
ones
who
are
most
directly
impacted
and
you
are
the
ones
gonna
be
living
with
whatever
happens
throughout
the
area
for
many
many
years
to
come
and
we're
going
to
be
excited
to
work
with
you,
Kathy
I
reached
out
to
you
and
Bob
Statler
of
the
Dane,
so
we're
gonna
look
forward
to
having
many
many
more
conversations
with
you
and
yes,
I
mean
we
want.
We
want
to
work
in
partnership
with
you,
so
I
just
wanted
to
share
that
with
the
group.
D
We
hear
you
loud
and
clear
and
again
we
see
this
as
our
role
of
planners
and
I
think,
particularly
in
the
times
that
we
find
ourselves
in
currently
right
now,
I
think
now
more
than
ever,
we
understand
that
our
work,
really.
We
need
to
be
leading
with
people
and
not
necessarily
about
projects
and
buildings
and
how
things
to
look,
but
our
work
really
is
about
the
people
in
those
places.
So
we
look
forward
to
working
with
you.
Thank.
F
K
Gardner
Neighborhood
Association,
one
of
the
subliminal
things
that
obviously
has
come
out
of
this
survey,
was
that
there
are
three
zip
codes
that
are
very
passionate
about
the
reason
cults
here
and
guess
what
it's
the
neighbor
neighborhoods
that
are
directly
affected
from
it
that
are
part
of
it.
Oh
that's
telling
you
something
that
maybe
you
weren't
looking
for,
but
that's
that
shows
the
importance
of
having
a
decent
working
group.
K
The
other
thing
is
I
would
like
to
see
a
breakdown
of
those,
the
building
heights,
the
residential
and
commercial
breakdowns
of
the
different
zip
codes
and
of
the
SOG
members
that
participated.
You
said
it
was
similar,
but
I
think
that
with
your
technology,
you
could
probably
quickly
do
a
breakdown
and
give
us
not
only
four
nine
five
one,
two
six,
nine
five
one,
two
five
and
nine
five
one
one
to
this
blog
members,
well
I'd
like
to
see,
if
there's
any
correlation
there
or
if
there's
something
that
we're
missing.
Thank.
B
B
A
Barbie
Darnell
North
will
gun
Neighborhood
Association
I'm
concerned
I
wanted.
Second,
what
Kevin
has
said
and
also
what
Kathy
has
said
as
well
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
if
you
can
parse
out
the
different
statistics
by
the
different
zip
codes,
it
would
be
helpful
to
see
what
aber
hoods,
how
close
they
were
to
the
project
as
whether
they
like
the
building
heights,
etcetera.
I.
Personally,
think
great.
A
As
Kathy
has
said,
building
heights
are
fine,
provided
you've
got
sufficient
interface
with
existing
small
numbers
of
single-family
residence
in
in
the
area
and
there's
also
a
historic
district
as
well.
There,
lake
house,
district
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
buildings
aren't
built
on
top
of
it
eclipsing
it.
A
I'm
looking
at
Hispanics,
which
are
32%
only
were
eight
percent
of
the
the
respondents
black,
which
are
three
percent
of
San
Jose,
are
one
percent
Asian,
eight
percent
versus
36%,
so
the
we're
not
hitting
the
minorities
we
are
outreach
to
our
minorities
was
insufficient.
For
this
survey
and
I
feel
it's
been
insufficient
for
this
latest
round
of
online
sag
process.
I
didn't
see
anything
that
really
was
in
Spanish.
H
Dave
can
I
jump
in
quickly
sure,
please
3
with
that
I
just
Harvey,
you
know,
I
think
he
and
everyone
else.
You
know
we.
We
all
agree
that
the
numbers
were
not
for
the
minority
groups
were
not
as
high
as
we
all
wanted
them
to
be,
and
through
the
process
we
actually
were
taking
stock,
as
we
were
doing
the
survey
and
seeing
the
responses
come
in
and
identifying,
and
so
that's
why
we
extended
the
survey.
H
A
Kevin
and
I
were
chair
of
the
Gardner
greater
Gardner
knack
Kathy
was
care
of
the
Delmas
Park
knack
and
I
think
you
could,
for
example,
reach
out
to
the
gardener
Academy,
which
is
predominantly
Hispanic
and
get
a
lot
of
the
parents.
That's
the
way,
often
when
we
were
having
problems
getting
participation
from
that
segment
of
the
community.
That's
how
we
redid
it
that's
one
way:
I.
B
B
This
amazing
advisory
group
gives
us
the
benefit
of
having
you
as
our
contacts
to
the
greater
community.
So
I
really
appreciate
that
idea.
Any
idea
you
all
have
as
well
beyond
the
community
partners
that
we
mentioned
you
all
are
equally
connected.
So
please
do
let
us
know
any
other
ideas
that
you
have
email
it
to
us.
Follow
up
with
us,
we'll
follow
up
with
you
and
continue
that
conversation.
So
thank
you
very
those.
There
was
an
excellent
point.
Thank
you.
So
much
may.
P
H
Tim
talked
about
the
seven
community
partners
that
we
have
that
are
under
contract
with
the
city,
so
those
groups
were
engaged,
beginning,
I,
believe
in
in
January
December
January
February,
specifically
to
help
do
engagement
with
a
diversity
of
members
of
the
city.
You
know
the
challenge
we
had
is
that
those
groups
were
supposed
to
be
doing.
You
know
smaller
meetings,
focused
group
meetings,
pop-up
workshops
within
the
community,
and
that
was
the
intent,
so
they
were
brought
on.
P
H
P
B
O
O
In
light
of
the
data
collection
of
data
and
using
language
such
as
the
underrepresented
minority,
the
reality
is
the
majority
that
you're
speaking
of
they're
just
underrepresented.
The
survey
information
so
I
think
there
needs
to
be
an
alignment
with
one's
understanding,
particularly
to
the
impacted
community
and
the
demographics
of
the
impacted
community.
The
second
piece
in
relations
to
the
individuals
that
you
have
contracted
to
collect
information,
that
is
to
connect
you
to
the
individuals
closest
to
the
pain.
O
Those
four,
mostly
impacted
I,
think
you
felt
in
identifying
the
ability
of
direct
service
organizations
to
be
a
grassroots
facilitator
and
connector
of
information
related
to
different
organizations
that
have
different
techniques
and
different
tools,
even
during
situations
like
over
19
that
give
them
the
versatility
to
engage
a
certain
communities,
just
not
from
a
small
group,
organizing
or
aid
or
not
in
this
environment.
You
must
show
a
veracity
of
flexibility
and
how
you
choose
to
engage,
and
you
cannot
be
satisfied
with
not
contacting
or
connecting
relationships
with
the
load.
O
Speaking
for
those
who
are
impacted
because,
as
I
look
at
the
panel
here,
I,
don't
think
that
many
of
us
are
impacted,
regardless
of
the
impact
it
may
have
in
your
community
over
time.
You'll
make
the
adjustment
prefer
those
relational
to
being
displaced
those
who
are
missing
from
this
panel,
those
organizations
that
cannot
speak.
O
B
I
Well
put
Reverend
Rael
pivot
a
little
because
he
said
that
much
more
eloquently
than
I
could
even
pretend
to
do
it.
So
so
I
know
it
was
anonymous
surveyed
but
I'm,
honestly,
Oh
absenting
a
little
appalled,
but
at
least
13
of
the
sag
members
responded
to
the
survey,
because
if
the
survey
wasn't
enough
to
get
close
to
100%
outreach
and
close
100
percent
response
from
the
sag
members,
how
good
was
it
truly
at
going
to
the
outer
layers
of
the
young
and
getting
additional
people?
I
So
I
think
that
that
third
team,
out
of
what
38
is,
unfortunately,
a
very,
very
telling
proportion
that
we
couldn't
even
get
50%
responses
out
of
the
sag
members.
So
whatever
we
can
do
to
you
can't
advocacy
force
responses
but
to
encourage
sag
members
to
respond,
respond
comprehensively
and
thoroughly.
I.
Think
it's
important
if
we're
to
honestly
hold
ourselves
up
as
representative
of
the
community
in
this
process.
I'm.
B
Very
much
of
you
with
that
ever.
Thank
you.
For
that
note,
yeah
I,
realized
I,
mean
again
I.
Think
with
the
situation,
we're
in
people
maybe
had
higher
priorities.
We
did
try
our
best
and
actually
called
every
single
SOG
member.
As
a
follow-up
I'm
asking
you
to
please
take
the
story
when
you
have
the
opportunity
and
I
think
there
still
is
an
opportunity
now
right,
we're
gonna
extend
the
timeout
and
now
that
we
have
all
this
great
conversation.
Hopefully
that
will
entice
you
to.
B
K
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
would
like
to
commend
Reverend
Ray
for
what
he
was
talking
about,
and
this
is
part
of
the
problem
that
were
being
exposed
to
was
in
the
last
month
on
a
lot
of
social
issues.
Is
that
it
may
be
that
we're
reaching
out
to
people
in
a
way
that
white
folk
like
to
communicate,
but
we're
missing
the
boat,
because
I
know
here
over
in
Gardiner
if
it
were
80%
Latino,
and
we
have
such
a
we're
showing
on
that
survey
from
that.
K
That
means
we're
not
reaching
the
neighborhood
over
here
at
all
and
I
I,
don't
know
whether
it's
a
digital
divide,
sort
of
thing
or
or
what.
But
maybe
you
need
to
get
another
consultant
on
board
who,
like
Reginald,
was
talking
about
and
Reverend
ray
we're
talking
about,
know
how
to
engage
with
these
communities.
So
we
can
get
their
input.
B
Appreciate
that
Kevin
yeah-
and
these
are
again
all
ideas
that
we're
considering
here,
moving
forward
to
increase
our
creativity
and
capacity
to
continue
to
give
all
that
want
access
to
the
process.
So
I
appreciate
those
thoughts
and
continue
to
bring
any
of
those
creative
thoughts
to
us
and
we'll
continue
to
look
into
that
as
well.
To
make
sure
that
that
we
could
do
it,
we
do
better
as
we
move
forward.
So
with
that
we're
gonna
go
ahead
and
now
move
to
the
next
section
of
the
presentation.
H
Right,
thank
you.
Everyone
for
the
comments
on
the
next
section
we're
going
to
talk
about
is
the
potential
transportation
improvements
in
the
your
own
station
area,
of
which
there
are
clearly
many
and
there's
clearly
a
lot
going
on.
You
know,
I
think
we've
covered
a
lot
of
these
topics
over
the
last
few
years,
but
you
know
there
are
these
multiple
transportation
plans,
projects
and
proposals
that
are
going
on.
The
disc
is
happening
that
downtown
what
Google's
downtown
West
proposal:
the
downtown
transportation
plan,
the
San
Jose
City
white
bike
plan.
H
All
of
these
are
plans
that
are
integrating
with
one
another
and
really
need
to
integrate
and
come
together
in
a
lot
of
ways
in
idea
at
on
station
area.
So
the
public
draft
of
the
the
D
set,
the
transportation
chapter
will
be
released
with
the
rest
of
the
dese
app
in
the
fall
and
part
of
what
really
needs
to
happen
here.
H
There
were
a
lot
of
comments
about
understanding
how
land
using
transportation
decisions
in
the
area
are
going
to
not
only
address
mobility
for
people
visiting,
but
the
people
who
live
in
the
area
and
immediately
adjacent
to
the
area
and
actually,
when
we,
when
we
look
at
the
at
the
open,
end
comments
the
they
really
revolved
around
three
components.
They
got
the
most
comments
in
the
survey.
The
first
was
the
need
for
bicycle
and
pedestrian
infrastructure
throughout
the
dese
app
and
in
the
open-ended
comments.
H
I
believe
there
were
over
a
hundred
comments
related
to
that
that
topic.
The
next
was
for
a
more
frequent
public
transit
and
then
the
last
one
was
to
make
sure
that.
Well,
there
is
a
focus
on
public
transit
and
there
is
a
focus
on
bicycle
pedestrian
infrastructure.
We
also
need
to
pay
attention
to
what
keeping
access
to
and
through
the
area
by
car,
and
so
there
were
also
a
lot
of
comments
around
transportation
safety,
particularly
around
this
was
mentioned
earlier.
The
280
and
bird
change
next
slide.
H
So
there
were,
there
were
two
questions
really.
There
were
two
questions
asked
in
this
section,
the
so
the
initial
ideas
for
the
D
rode
on
stationary
and
the
downtown
transportation
plans
were
presented,
and
then
questions
were
asked
about
whether
they
were
exciting
to
people
or
whether
they
were
concerning
and
the
the
for
the
exciting.
H
The
improvements
of
the
light
rail
system
and
enhancing
bike
corridors
were
really
the
the
two
top
ones
followed
closely
by
improvements
to
the
third
Avenue
280
interchange,
and
so
we
know
that
came
up
earlier
as
a
comment,
and
so
that
was
also
reflected
here
in
the
survey
as
well.
The
34
percent
I
said
it
was
exciting:
the
concept
of
closing
the
87
off-ramp
to
Santa
Clara
Street
and
improving
the
87
interchange
then
with
the
concerning
the
ones
that
were
most
concerning
for
the
community.
H
Interestingly,
we're
closing
the
off-ramp,
even
though
it's
still
got
a
high
number
and
then
a
lot
of
people
actually
said
none
of
the
above.
But
what
what
we
see
with
the
the
nearly
600
people
who
responded
to
the
survey
is
that
a
lot
of
the
ideas
that
are
coming
forward
are
good
ideas,
ideas
that
should
move
forward
with
some
concern
over
over
some
of
those
I
over
some
of
the
specifics.
The
the
saga
13
SOG
members
had
essentially
the
same
top
three
concepts
of
what
was
exciting.
H
B
F
I
The
topic
of
clothing,
the
87
off-ramp,
was
kind
of
publicly
raised
more
broadly
taken
to
the
voters.
I
would
think
it
would
lose
badly.
I
mean
I,
go
by
there
by
bike
and
on
pedestrian
quite
often,
and
a
lot
of
people
that
I
talk
to
when
I
mention
that
item
they
kind
of
look
and
said.
Well,
why
would
we
do
that
it'll
be
harder
for
me
to
get
downtown?
It's
not
that
big
of
a
deal.
G
This
is
Jessica.
Thank
you.
No
I'm
deputy
director
for
the
Department
of
Transportation
yeah.
We
were
we're
taking
all
of
this
feedback
tonight,
as
well
as
in
any
neighborhood
meetings
or
smaller
group
meetings
that
folks
want
to
have
with
us
and
we're
just
trying
to
take
it
all
in
I.
Think
that
you
know
Kim
and
Dave
and
others
have
already
spoken
to
the
shortcomings
of
some
of
the
brief
presentations
and
what
that
format
was
able
to
do
and
not
able
to
do,
and
so
I
think.
G
That's
another
really
good
point
Edward
is
that
you
know
there's
there
wasn't
enough
context
about
why
we
would
consider
such
an
idea
and
I
think
you
know
for
those
who
are
listening,
who
haven't
watched
the
video.
You
know
we're
trying
to
think
about
the
balance
of
people
entering
and
exiting
into
the
area
and
kind
of
how
they
will
flow
the
best
and
present
the
fewest
conflicts.
F
F
B
G
Think
it's
a
it's
a
good
opportunity
to
talk
about
Bill's
question
about
what
are
the
light.
Rail
improvements
and
I
know.
Melissa
from-from
VTA's
is
here
too,
and
we're
trying
to
understand
what
would
make
a
meaningful
difference
in
the
light
rail
travel
times
through
the
downtown,
particularly
between
the
Deardon
station,
the
core
of
downtown
and
then
kind
of
in
either
direction
to
Campbell
or
to
North,
San,
Jose
and
beyond
that
to
Mountain
View.
So
we're
definitely
in
that
period
of
exploration.
G
But
the
fundamental
challenge
that
we're
trying
to
address
is
that
it
is
today
faster
to
bike
from
Dehradun
station
to
the
downtown
light
rail
than
it
is
to
take
light
rail
from
Deardon
station
to
the
downtown
transit
mall,
light
rail
stations,
and
so
we
are
exploring
with
VTA
kind
of
what
it
could
look
like
and
what
kind
of
cost
it
would
entail
to
take
light
rail
on
a
different
path
that
is
less
circuitous
either
at
grade
or
underground.
So
it's
very
early
exploration,
but
that's
the
that's
the
goal.
G
There
are
some
other
lower-cost
ways
of
speeding
up
light
rail
that
were
also
certainly
open
to
considering,
but
but
the
aspiration
is
to
have
it
be
faster
to
to
take
transit
into
to
a
than
it
is
today
for
sure
and
and
then
it
is
to
get
around
by
other
modes,
especially
something
like
light
rail.
That
is
great
separated.
So
thank
you
for
the
question
bill
and
for
the
thoughts
on
the
87
off-ramp
as
well.
Great.
B
S
Sorry
about
that,
the
last
thing
I
want
to
do
is
waste
anyone's
evening,
so
my
name
is
Nate
LeBlanc
I
work
at
the
San
Jose
downtown,
Association
and
I
have
kind
of
a
two-part
comment.
The
first
is
for
what
it's
worth,
I,
actually
liked
the
videos
and
having
time
to
sit
with
them
and
watch
them
a
couple
of
times
and
consider
them
and
then
respond
to
them.
In
writing.
S
E
Thank
you,
Norma
Camacho,
with
belly
water,
and
one
thing
I
did
want
to
note
as
an
organization
of
about
800
employees
when
Kovac
19
hit,
we
had
maybe
less
than
10
people
that
were
telework
me
and
now
we
have
400
working,
strong
teleworking
and
Keller
workings
can
become
a
much
more
standard
part
of
our
operation.
So
when
you
develop
these
transportation
plans,
are
you
going
to
look
at
that
fundamental
change
and
how
people
are
doing
business
now
and
and
how
are
you
going
to
interject
that?
E
Because
we
don't
know
when
they
Edmund
of
Corbett
19
is
going
to
be,
and
even
if
it
does
end?
Oh,
we
don't
know
if
people
are
going
to
want
to
go
back
to
how
we
used
to
do
business
before
I
know
that
we,
as
an
organization,
aren't
going
to
be
doing
that
we're
going
to
look
at
doing
business
a
different
way.
So
we're
just
wondering
how
are
you
going
to
take
that
into
account
into
this
planning
process?.
G
But
I
think
we
all
need
to
take
this
as
the
potential
profound
change
that
it
is
especially
around
telecommuting
and
what
that
could
mean
for
cleaner
air,
carbon
emissions,
etc
and
kind
of
we're
trying
to
think
of
it
as
scenario
plans
at
this
point
because
of
the
uncertainty
both
with
this
current
disease,
but
also
with
the
the
longer
trends
towards
occupying
space
as
employees
etc.
Right,
so
that's
the
best
thing
we
can
think
about
doing
with
that.
But
I
would
welcome
any
any
further
thoughts
on
on
how
to
perform
that
great
minds.
B
P
Talked
about
I
think
that
a
lot
of
these
companies
got
so
a
couple
of
our
clients
are
rethinking
space
for
their
employees
and
I'm
wondering
do
we
have
a
contingency
for
Google
and/or,
all
the
projected
projects
to
shift
from
office
space
to
the
housing
space
and-
and
we
know
some
of
that
thinking-
is
going
on
with
many
of
our
clients
on
some
of
these
bigger
projects.
So
do
we
have
a
contingency
for
that.
N
B
D
Waiting
for
instructions,
you
are
up
Sondra
plant
51
in
real
estate,
as
well
as
with
my
husband's
job
he's
companies
and
in
the
beginning,
of
course,
we
did
think
that
commercial
space
would
kind
of
decrease
in
the
need,
but
now
that
they're
talking
about
going
back
to
work,
it's
actually
increasing
because
of
the
amount
of
space
needed
between
people.
So
just
keep
that
in
consideration.
When
thinking
you
know
it
might
not.
Indeed,
yes,
some
people
may
be
working
from
home,
but
others
commercial
space
may
become
even
more
valuable.
D
B
B
H
You
Dave
I,
want
to
say,
I,
really
appreciate
all
the
comments
and
this
whole
question
of
how
do
we
think
about
the
future
when
we're
in
the
situation
we're
in
now
it
is
so
critical
and
so
the
comment
the
comments
coming
up
are
great
because
I,
you
know,
as
as
a
planner
who
thinks
about
this
every
day,
I'm
constantly
getting
new
ideas.
So
thank
you
all,
and
hopefully
at
least
you
know
with
that
piece.
We
doesn't
that
conversation
going
about
what
it
means
any.
B
A
A
B
You,
how
are
you
thank
you
for
that
note,
and
one
thing
I
forgot
to
mention
is
real,
quick.
Obviously,
when
we're
together,
we
have
a
flipchart
up,
and
you
see
us
actively
taking
those
notes
or
on
our
computers.
Rest
assured
that
is
definitely
happening
concurrently.
Our
team
is
taking
all
this
information,
putting
it
in
a
Google
sheet
that
will
be
shared
out
with
city
staff
and
we'll
pair
summary
from
so
I.
Just
want
to
note
that.
B
K
Hear
yourself:
yes,
yes,
it
is
I
just
wanted
to
Kevin
Chrisman
thank
garden.
Association
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you
insert
here
the
comments
that
I
made
earlier
about
the
bird
overpass
at
280
and
the
assess
the
safer
accessibility
for
all
our
children.
So
all
those
comments
that
I
made-
maybe
a
little
bit
too
soon
put
it
in
here
with
transportation,
because
it's
very
relevant
sounds.
D
Just
again
piggybacking
on
what
Harvey
said,
this
has
to
do
with
transportation.
Of
course
we're
the
I
watch
that
again
Matt
video
was
really
well
done,
Department
of
Transportation
and
then
towards
the
end,
I
got
to
okay.
They
reiterated
that
that
San
Fernando
pathway
that
east-west,
that
would
run
right
by
our
building
if
it
was
directly
cut
through
that
we
would
just
really
love
to
see
more
details.
What
does
that
look
like
with
the
biking
and
the
flow
of
that?
D
G
Thank
You
Sandra,
if
nobody
minds
I'd,
also
offer
that
Laura
winter
has
also
brought
up.
You
know
questions
about
the
you
know
the
details
really
matter,
especially
for
people
who
live
right
there,
and
so
we,
the
opportunity
for
for
those
who
haven't
been
following
its
closely
to
kind
of
raise
the
tracks
raise.
G
The
station's
has
a
bike
ped
connection
opportunity
along
San
Fernando
under
that
raised
station
and
raised
tracks
and
good
questions
from
Sandra
just
now,
and
also
from
Laura
about
how
to
make
sure
that
that
is
well
integrated
with
Cahill
Park,
rather
than
bifurcating
the
park
as
it
as
it
could
do,
if
poorly
designed,
and
so
that
that's
really
great
feedback.
That
just
maybe
should
be
on
the
record
here
too,
and
that
we're
really
considering.
Thank
you
great.
I
Disk
has
the
National
Register
of
Historic,
Places
and
city
landmark
Deardon
station
disappearing,
and
the
google
downtown
west
project
has
a
primary
open,
plaza
right
in
front
of
the
station.
So
how'd,
all
those
forms
of
transportation
interact
very
clearly
it's
of
two
different
minds.
So
somehow
those
need
to
come
together.
Otherwise,
we'll
have
two
plans
that
are
mutually
exclusive.
G
I
think
Edward
brought
up
that
that
point
in
the
meeting
we
had
with
dang
and
it's
a
very
good
one.
I
think
that
the
the
station
needs
to
work
today,
all
the
way
through
to
hopefully
when
there
is
an
expanded
station
that
can
serve
more
people.
The
detailed
design
of
the
future
station
is
very
far
from
complete.
G
So
that's
something
the
urban
design
team
for
four-disc
is
working
at
and
one
other
thing
I
think
we
all
share
a
real
appreciation
for
today's
station
and
the
disk
work
to
date.
That
has
led
to
a
belief
that
we
probably
need
to
move
it
or
repurpose.
It
comes
from
the
additional
train
tracks
that
will
be
needed
to
occur
at
the
station
and
so
the
the
work
on
how
to
hopefully
reintegrate
the
historic
Depot
into
either
the
future
station
or
the
surrounding
area.
G
B
E
Dave
Laura
winter
from
the
st.
Leo's
neighborhood
I
wanted
to
thank
Jess
for
her
comments
and
just
let
everyone
know
that
we've
had
very
good
conversations
with
d-o-t
we're
all
very
concerned
about
how
the
extension
of
San
Fernando
Street
on
the
west
side
of
the
station
is
going
to
work.
There's
a
lot
of
really
deep
details
that
need
to
be
worked
out,
but
we're
we're
very
excited
to
work
with
G
ot
and
talk
about
what
it
means
to
to
our
neighborhood
and
get
something
that
works
for
everyone.
Thanks
great.
B
H
Thank
you
so
again,
Matt
Raymond
Raymond
associates
so
now
we're
going
to
move
into
the
community
services
and
facilities
and
parks,
recreation
and
open
space.
A
lot
of
a
lot
of
title
here
for
this
topic.
So
the
2014
d
sap
did
identify
a
diversity
of
community
services
and
facilities,
end
up
open
space
concept
with
distributed
open
spaces
and
inter
inter
connected
with
walkways
and
Paseos.
H
There
is
some
information
that
actually
has
changed
since
the
dese
app
was
was
adopted
in
2014
that
dese
app
had
more
of
a
concept
of
sort
of
larger,
suburban
parks,
but
those
are
now
the
shift
is
moving
more
towards
urban
parks,
especially
with
the
amount
of
development
that's
happening
or
the
potential
for
development
and
much
more
urban
area.
There
was
I
know
also
a
conversation
about
whether
Lakatos
Creek
should
be
delighted,
and
that
is
not
feasible
at
this
time.
H
The
D
set
of
amendments
have
a
projected
parkland
goal
of
62
acres
of
land
or
equivalent
recreational
amenities,
and
this
is
going
to
be
bet,
but
both
room
and
dedication
in
Luffy
and
and
recreational
improvements
to
the
existing
existing
facilities.
The
key
priorities
identified
during
the
process
and
in
the
plan
and
to
identify
trail
alignment
of
preferred
trail
alignment
and
open
spaces
to
complete
the
list.
Goddess
Creek
Trail
create
a
network
of
small,
interconnected
person
open
spaces.
H
There
also
comes
conversations
about
the
community
facilities
and
services
really
focusing
on
a
centralized
community
center
or
a
community
center
of
the
future,
with
multiple
services
and
different
types
of
spaces.
The
there's
an
emphasis
on
providing
programs
and
services
that
focus
on
job
training,
continuing
education
and
access
to
opportunity,
and
the
idea
is
that
this
centralized
community
center
would
help
to
bridge
the
gap
for
people
to
move
into
higher,
paying
higher
wage
jobs
to
continue
their
education
and
to
make
sure
that
there's
a
greater
access
to
opportunity.
H
The
focus
of
the
survey
was
actually
not
on
parks
and
open
space,
but
really
on
the
community
services
and
facilities
and
outstanding
questions
around
that.
So
the
the
question
asked
about
considering
the
planned
growth
in
the
downtown,
which
programs
are
people
most
interested
in
seeing
in
the
deer
around
station
area.
The
results
that
you
can
see
here,
Art
Center
auditorium
and
after-school
programs
and
community
meeting
space
worth
we're
at
the
highest
fitness
center
Jim,
high-tech
and
digital
literacy
programs
in
preschool,
were
towards
the
bottom
of
the
results.
H
L
H
Point
that
came
through
here,
not
surprising,
but
important.
Nonetheless,
there
are
also
lots
of
comments
about
improving
and
connecting
the
Guadalupe
River
Trail
to
los
gatos
Creek
and
then
having
flexible
community
eating
spaces
for
community
groups
for
nonprofits
and
others,
and
so
that
people
who
really
see
the
community
center
as
a
place
for
lots
of
different
types
of
activities
to
happen.
H
Knowing
that
the
community
meeting
spaces
in
this
area
are
very
limited-
and
you
know
our
team
knows
that
firsthand,
as
we've
tried
to
find
meetings
for
the
work
for
our
workshops
and
other
meetings
in
the
dura
Don
station
area.
So
we
would
have
loved
a
great
community
eating
space
that
holds
200
people
in
this
area.
So
we
are
supportive
of
that,
so
any
moving.
Then
we
had
actually
next
next
slide.
Please
Dave
Joanna.
H
That
yeah
sorry
thanks.
The
top
three
from
the
SOG
was
the
community
meeting
space,
the
employment
services
one-stop
Center
preschool
space,
and
so
they
thanks
for
reminding
me
of
this.
The
results
from
the
saga
actually
came
back
a
little
different
than
then
what
the
the
other
600
or
so
community
members
said
relative
to
this.
So
again,
just
the
important
point
they,
the
other
topics,
have
been
pretty
pretty
much
in
line,
but
this
was
a
little
different.
H
There
was
a
question
about
whether
about
people's
reaction
to
the
community
center
in
the
Deer
Road
on
station
area,
and
you
know
a
lot
of
people
said
that
they,
if
they
thought
it,
was
a
good
idea
but
they're
not
sure
they
would
use
it
followed
by.
It
sounds
like
something
that
people
they
liked
and
people
would
use.
Only
15
percent
said
that
they
didn't
like
the
idea
at
all.
H
So
it
seems
that
there
is
support
for
a
community
center
in
in
this
area,
and
I
certainly
think
it's
worth
digging
into
the
comment
previously
about
the
existing
community
center
in
the
neighborhood
and
the
status
of
that
concurrent
with
a
potential
new
center
in
the
dirt
on
station
area.
So
I
wanna
bring
up
that
point
as
we
did
this
so
now
we
can
move
to
questions
and
comments
on
the
topic
and
again,
apologies,
there's
so
much
information
here
and
we're
we're
trying
to
just
get
some
of
the
highlights.
B
A
You
didn't
talk
about
that
and
you
didn't
ask
about
that.
What
the
community
wants
I'm
concerned,
that
that,
if
we
spend
an
awful
lot
of
our
park
fees
on
a
community
center
that
we're
going
to
be
in
the
same
position
that
we
were
when
we
spent
six
million
dollars
of
measure,
P
funds
built
a
Center
in
Gardner
neighborhood
and
then,
when
the
city
ran
out
of
money,
we
didn't
have
onm
operation
and
management
fees
to
keep
the
center
going
and
we
had
to
reuse
it
as
we
called
it.
A
Well,
I
want
to
know
what
is
the
minimum
that
you're
willing
as
a
city
to
do.
We
need
open
space.
We
found
out
in
this
whole
Kovan
thing
going
on:
I
saw
on
next
door
high-rise
residents
complaining
about
the
fact
that
they
had
no
place
to
take
their
dogs
for
a
walk
to
defecate.
There
were
no
parks
that
were
open
and
putting
in
large
numbers
of
high-rise
in
high-density
housing.
We're
going
to
need
to
produce
more
than
more
acreage
than
then
is
being
proposed.
The.
B
A
Let's
see
one
more:
oh,
yes,
I
have
one
more
thing.
In
the
Midtown
specific
plan
adopted
in
1992,
we
were
promised
community.
The
Midtown
area
was
promised
that
when
the
Fire
Training
Center
was
abandoned
or
fire
use
that
it
would
be
turned
into
a
large
park
and
I
see
no
attempt
to
find
any
kind
of
land
anywhere
in
this
area,
and
second
promise
that
we
were
made
was
that
if
we
build
them
high
and
build
them,
dense,
it'll
leave
a
lot
of
lot
more
open
space
between
buildings
that
we
could
you
utilize
for
park.
Space.
B
Harvey
yeah:
that's
not
the
team,
responding
and
again
we're
here
to
have
this
great
discussion.
We
want
to
allow
you
all
an
opportunity
to
provide,
but
if
we
can
please
just
for
the
same
good
time
and
everyone's
time
and
interested
in
staying
focused
here
with
our
discussion,
that
would
be
great
in
the
questions
and
topics
you're
asking
but
I
appreciate
that
Harvey
Nicole
did
you
want
to
respond
to
any
back.
L
Yeah
sure
I
would
love
to
and
I'll
also
say,
don't
worry,
since
we
are
running
a
little
bit
short
on
time.
You
know
people
certainly
are
welcome
to
reach
out
to
me
and
I
know.
A
number
of
people
have
I'm
happy
to
talk
through
these
independently.
If
you
don't
get
to
ask
questions
tonight,
I'm
Nicole,
Burnham
I'm,
a
deputy
director
with
the
Department
of
Parks
Recreation
neighborhood
service,
I,
oversee
arc
little
programs,
so
I
wrote
all
my
notes,
Harvey,
so
I'm
gonna
try
to
get
through
them
one
by
one.
L
Would
your
point
about
no
open
space
in
the
survey
is?
Is
a
good
one?
It's
an
interesting
one,
I
think
from
our
perspective,
we
assume
it's
somewhat
of
a
given
that
there's
gonna
be
open
space
here
and
there
will
be
parks
and
they're
going
to
be
urban
and
formed,
given
the
nature
of
the
existing
development
and
the
proposed
development.
So
it
wasn't
it's
a
slight
parks
that
we
didn't
ask
about
it.
L
The
presentation
and
I
want
to
make
sure
this
is
really
clear.
The
presentation
doesn't
talk
about
using
Park
fees
to
pay
for
the
community
center
right.
The
presentation
was
intended
to
just
ask
the
question
about
community
centers.
You
know
we
have
a
service
level
goal
of
five
hundred
square
feet
of
service
level
per
a
thousand
residents
so
and
in
a
growing
city.
So
we
need
about
five
hundred
thousand
square
feet
of
community
center
space
now
and
we're
about
at
that.
L
We,
it
bounces
up
and
down
as
we
convert
properties
to
different
uses,
but
but
we
have
also
recognized
that
as
a
growing
city,
there
will
be
future
need
and-
and
we
do
serve
a
need
in
this
community.
Our
recreation
centers
are
really
important
in
providing
equitable
services
making
sure
people
have
access
to
a
variety
of
services,
whether
it's
childcare,
digital
literacy,
after-school
programs,
teen
programs
and,
frankly,
I.
Don't
know
what
exactly
a
programming
would
be
in
a
facility
downtown,
because
we
would
tailor
the
facility
to
the
demographics
of
the
community
that
it's
serving
right.
L
One
of
the
things
we
find
in
our
existing
spaces
is
we
didn't
design
them
with
enough
flexibility,
so
new
spaces.
We
would
look
for
more
flexibility
in
design,
so
we
can
modify
their
uses
over
time
and
convert
them,
but
in
terms
of
existing
community
center
space
we
have
Gardner,
which
is
a
neighborhood
center.
That
really
does
a
nice
job
of
serving
that
Gardner
neighborhood,
that's
the
neighborhood
was
intended
to
serve
and
we
have
Roosevelt
as
a
major
hub
Center
on
21st,
Street
and
Bascom
out
on
Southwest
expressway
area.
L
So
there's
really
nothing
in
this
downtown
area
and
in
North,
inter
into
the
Rose
Garden
area.
So
we
really
wanted
to
explore
this
with
the
community,
as
we
really
see
this,
that
we
see
doesn't
heat
and
it's
gonna
be
a
growing
need.
So
that
was
the
reason,
but
we,
but
again,
let
me
just
reiterate
this:
we
did
not
stay
in
that
presentation.
We're
talking
about
using
Park
fees
to
pay
for
a
community
center.
We
were
silent
on
the
topic
of
how
it
would
get
paid
for
because
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
potential
options
there.
L
So
I
want
to
make
sure.
That's
because
I
think
you
know
that's
one
of
nuance.
That
definitely
was
lost
in
that
in
an
online
presentation,
and
we
do
recognize
that
we
have
challenges
with
staffing.
You
know
you,
you
question
that
Harvey
we
we
understand
that
we
recognize
that
it's
I'm
not
going
to
tell
you
that
it's
a
riddle,
we've
solved
it's
something
that
we
as
a
department
talked
a
lot
about.
We
have
some
some
plans
in
the
works
and
some
ideas
going
forward,
but
it's
we
need
to
find
some
long-term
solutions
for
that.
L
L
The
three
are
three
to
five
acre
three
and
a
half
acres
per
thousand
residents.
That
is
not
a
goal
that
we've
abandoned
Quimby
calls
the
three
acres
per
thousand.
Our
general
plan
calls
three
and
a
half
acres
per
thousand
interesting
nuances.
That
happens
when
you
start
to
look
at
Park.
Mapping
in
the
city
is
where
that
acreage
is
located,
becomes
critically
important
in
this
specific
area,
even
without
proposed
parks
in
the
dese
app,
we
actually
have
a
fairly
well
served.
L
Park
System,
the
arena,
Green
Discovery,
meadow
Guadalupe,
River,
Trail,
Guadalupe,
River,
Park
System,
actually
has
a
lot
of
parkland
and
not
enough
density.
So,
yes,
we
definitely
want
to
add
parkland
as
part
of
the
as
part
of
the
Deardon
area
plan,
but
if
we
only
want
to
look
at
a
metric
of
three
and
a
half
acres
per
thousand
residents,
we
already
meet
that
in
this
area.
So
then
we
start
digging
a
little
deeper
into
things
like
ten
minute
walk
criteria.
You
know:
where
is
that
open
space
located?
L
Where
is
it
located
and
context
of
existing
population?
Where
will
it
be
located
in
context
of
proposed
population?
Not
only
the
proposed
population
through
the
dirt
on
West
project,
but
also
existing
in
proposed
population
that
may
be
limited
by
barriers
like
the
trade
tracks?
So
when
you
start
looking
at
that
kind
of
criteria,
it
puts
a
little
bit
of
a
different
lens
and
we
are
working
through
that
right
now
and
looking
at
that
in
more
detail,
I
hear
you
about
open
space
in
the
riparian
corridor
and
I
hear
you
about
the
Midtown
specific
plan.
L
But
you
know
we.
We
recognize
that
you
know
I'm
familiar
with
the
plan.
I
understand
that
it
that
it
called
for
that
the
city
no
longer
owns
that
property,
and
so
it's
an
issue
we're
working
to
navigate.
But
the
idea
that
we
might
find
five
acres
of
one
contiguous,
five
acre
parcel
in
the
dirt
on
area,
maybe
may
be
challenging,
and
so
we're
looking
at
alternatives
and
evaluating
that.
Well,.
L
B
Definitely
definitely
follow
up
to
this
again.
I
appreciate
all
your
time,
but
this
is
a
marathon
here
of
a
zoom
meeting.
We
have
tech,
maybe
about
20
minutes
left
on
the
schedule,
but
we're
happy
to
stay,
because
we
want
to
make
sure
that
public
is
also
allowed
to
speak
and
I
just
want
to
give
other
folks
some
space
as
well
Kiyomi
Michelle
this
submarine
Ernst.
B
K
I'll
do
my
best
Kevin
Crispin
Gardner,
Neighborhood
Association
nailed
it
okay
on
the
survey
showed
that
people
40%
of
the
people
one
at
an
Art
Center.
Well,
let's
point
out
that
we
do
have
an
art
room
over
at
Gardner
and
we
even
have
a
ceramics
room
that
is
not
in
use
anymore
because
we
can't
get
to
it.
The
reuse
has
not
worked
out
very
well
with
that.
K
We,
what
has
worked
out
very
well
is
we
do
have
a
pool
that
we
would
be
more
than
happy
to
share
with
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
and
they
have
an
excellent
regroup.
Reuse
group
running
that
I,
don't
know
Nicole.
If
you
made
it
a
Freudian
slip
or
not,
but
I
was
taking
some
notes
and
you
know
I've
always
called
it
a
community
center
and
you
called
it
a
recreation
center
and
I
that
might
have
been
Freudian
slip
because
it
really
doesn't
belong
to
the
community
anymore.
It's
never
open.
K
It's
almost
like
a
an
activity
center
for
the
city
of
San
Jose,
because
it
doesn't
work
very
well
for
us.
I,
don't
get
the
whole
point
of
having
a
room
for
200
people
over
there
when
you
could
get
probably
Google
to
open
up
one
of
their
rooms
for
a
meeting
or
you
know
if
you
want
to
be
really
glib
about
it.
K
F
L
L
L
L
C
B
I
Can
deep
addressing
that
can
skip
that
during
this
whole
process?
We've
talked
about
a
need
to
kind
of
think
out
of
the
box
and
think
collaboratively
the
San
Jose
Water
Company,
building
right
there
on
Santa
Clara.
That
was
originally
part
of
the
hashtag
teardown
project
which,
as
we
know,
Trammell
crow
put
forward,
is
kind
of
a
canary
in
the
coal
mine
for
Google.
Google
has
more
than
once
pointed
out
that
they
want
to
create
some
kind
of
a
community
space
there.
So,
let's
think
creatively
and
whatever
kind
of
community
center
we're
talking
about.
I
Let's
make
that
a
public-private
partnership
there,
rather
than
dedicating
funds
and
resources
that
might
be
put
into
something
else,
and
the
related
note,
and
it
everybody
at
the
city
knows
that
have
the
issue.
The
issue
isn't:
capital
expenditures,
it's
getting
the
city
to
commit
to
long
term
funding
for
maintenance
and
operations,
and
those
are
the
things
that
are
too
far
too
often
fall
through
the
cracks
and
then
five
years
later,
I
thought
we
had
this,
but
we
don't
anymore
so
kind
of
being
aware
of
those
things
so
we're
not
just
taking
short-term
and
traditional
methodologies.
B
Appreciate
that
Edward,
thank
you
so
with
that
we're
gonna
move
on
to
the
final
piece
here
and
I'm
going
to
turn
it
back
over
to
Matt
and
then
we'll
have
a
final
song
discussion
and
thank
you.
All
members
of
the
public
for
hanging
on
with
us
I
see
hands,
raised
we're
gonna,
move
to
public
comment
right
after
that,
give
you
all
a
chance
to
contribute
so
Matt
you're
up
alright.
H
H
So
I
want
to
be
clear
as
where
service
or
jumping
into
that,
that
it's
not
reopening
that
really
the
majority
of
community
benefits
when
he
is
going
to
these
three
areas.
So
the
first
question
asked
about
if
there's
a
limited
amount
of
subsidy
available
for
affordable
housing,
what
is
more
important?
Is
it
more
important
to
provide
to
provide
fewer
units
but
for
extremely
low
and
very
low
income?
H
We
gave
five
steps
in
the
overall
about
where
people
kind
of
felt
on
this,
and
there
was
a
preference
from
the
public
leaning
towards
having
more
affordable
units
at
various
income
levels,
rather
than
necessarily
just
focusing
on
more
extremely
low
income.
Households,
the
the
sog
was
was
neutral,
so
the
sog
was
I,
guess
a
little
bit
more
reports
having
fewer
units
and
extremely
low
household
income
levels.
H
So
again
you
might
be
able
to
get
more
units
and
you'd
also
be
able
to
spread
the
affordable
housing
throughout
throughout
the
city
a
little
bit
more,
and
it
was
really
a
two
to
one
that
said
that
developers
should
be
able
to
build
their
affordable
housing
outside
of
the
here
at
on
station
area.
The
survey
was
not
specific
about
where
or
how,
far
or
or
anything
so
again,
it's
it's
beginning
to
point
in
a
direction.
It's
another
data
pump.
Next,
please.
H
But
but
there's
really
a
lot
of
a
sort
of
parallel
here
and
the
the
sog.
The
comments
were:
the
preserve
existing,
affordable
housing,
build
new,
affordable
housing
and
invest
in
a
community-based
ownership
project,
so
only
slightly
different
from
what
the
public
head
said.
The
next
question
was
about
job
training
and
education,
and
people
were
asked
to
rank
the
following
ideas
in
the
order:
that's
most
important
for
increasing
job
training
and
educational
opportunities.
H
Unlike
the
previous
one,
there
were
really
differences
here
in
terms
of
the
potential
strategies,
with
the
top
three
being
funding
for
early
childhood
programs.
Funding
for
K
through
12
programs
to
enhance
stem
and
career
exploration
and
then
scholarships
to
attend
college
lower
down
on
the
list
was
job
training
and
to
create
in
employment
services
one-stop
stanner,
the
sub
identified
their
top
three
priorities
as
job
training,
funding
for
job
experience,
programs
and
then
funding
for
early
childhood
programs.
So
again,
here
there
was
a
little
bit
of
a
difference
between
the
members
of
the
sog.
S
H
The
the
you
know,
following
that
was
increased
access
to
cities,
recreational
programs
and
activities
and
enhance
maintenance
of
existing
parks
and
open
space
and
it
and
finally
followed
by
support
for
public
art
and
local
artists,
and
so
again
this
is.
This
is
not
that
these
are
not
important
overall,
because
we
saw
that
art
space
with
the
community
center
actually
ranked
really
high
in
the
survey.
It
was
the
question
of
these
theorists
funds
left
over
from
the
other
three
primary
community
benefits.
B
F
Jeremy,
cannon
working
partnerships-
USA
yeah.
Well,
you
know,
obviously
it's
a
it's
it's.
Unfortunately,
we
didn't
see
a
as
wide
a
participation
in
this
survey
but
appreciate
the
the
approach
in
this
survey.
You
know,
certainly
you
know
when
we've
done
our
own
survey
work,
we
saw
a
strong
support
for
investing
an
empty
displacement,
investing
in
affordable
housing,
these
kind
of
quality,
job
issues
and
so
appreciate.
F
The
staff
focus
in
this
section
on
those
issues
would
be
interested
in
terms
of
the
community
stabilization
fund.
I
know
it's
a
topic.
I
think
there's
been
some
discussion
out,
but
would
be
interested
to
hear
a
little
bit
more
from
staff
on
on
their
initial
thoughts.
I
I
do
like
the
idea
of
trying
to
think
about.
You
know,
rather
than
a
rush
to
figure
out
every
project
between
now
and
March,
to
be
able
to
have
more
time
to
be
a
little
intentional
about
things.
C
F
F
C
B
D
Hi
Kiyomi
policy
attorney
with
the
law
just
kind
of
following
up
on
on
Jeffrey's
question,
is
how
like
what
are
so
I
know
that
we're
still
kinda
more
than
the
exploratory
phase
around
the
communities,
Stabilization
Fund,
what's
kind
of
the
best
way
to
you
know
for
us
to
follow
that
process
and
for
us
to
you
know
and
for
the
community
leaders
to
provide
input
just
so
that
you
know
you
know,
is
it
just
a
solid
process?
You
know
what
how
do
we?
D
C
Me
know
on
the
first
question,
yet
we'd
be
happy
to
meet
with
you
any
organizations
or
individuals
that
have
further
thoughts
and
ideas
on
this.
You
know
we've
had
a
lot
of
conversations
and
we're
just
always
happy
to
have
more,
so
we
can
certainly
meet
and
talk
outside
of
the
sag
evenings.
A
second
question:
I'm,
going
to.
D
And
I
guess
this
is
Jackie
Ross
the
housing
director
and
you
know
we
have
multiple
documents
that
are
coming
out.
We
have
the
anti
displacement
plan,
that's
gonna
be
coming
before
the
council
in
August
and
we're
gonna
be
listening
for
you
know
what
are
the
policy
pieces
and
issues
that
rise
to
the
top
we're
working
on
an
affordable
housing
plan
for
this
area,
and
that
would
be
another
place
that
we
could
take
public
in,
but
and
again
just
meeting
with
people
who
would
want
to
continue
to
express
concerns
and
interests
in
this
area.
B
P
Introduction
to
opening
to
us
tonight
is
cognizant
of
some
of
the
racist
of
the
racial
divide
between
how
we
see
these
processes
in
our
institution
and
many
of
the
people
that
bit
that
will
take
their
survey
or
people
like
you.
You
know
guys,
there's
people
that
has
homeowners
that
that's
not
pressed,
that's
not
in
need
of
some
of
these
services,
and
we
end
up
talking
about
a
lot
about
the
parks
and
open
space
and
separ.
P
But
many
of
the
people
that
don't
respond
to
these
types
of
bays
are
working
very
hard
and
they
don't
they
don't
take.
They
don't
make
the
shift
to
doing
being
civically
proactive
because
they
are
trying
to
exist
right
and
so
their
voices
many
times
are
not
heard
or
not.
Wait.
They
don't
get
to
weigh
in
on
these
things
and
I.
Think
that
that
that's
why
some
of
our
data
can
easily
be
skewed
so
I
think
that
needs
to
be
a
deliberate,
deliberate
reach.
P
You
know
and
Kim
statement
about
the
things
will
probably
shift
over
time,
but
there
are
some
initial
things
that
we
probably
a
me
up,
especially
around
housing
and
early
childhood
and
education.
All
those
issues
that
came
up
and
this
community
stabilization
fund
there
are
some
there
needs
to
be
some
more
outreach,
so
people
can
really
speak
to
this
cuz
I.
Don't
think
we
got
the
right
answers
quite
yet.
We
might
be
closed.
This
might
be
the
exact
right
answers,
but
I
don't
think
enough.
D
And
I
just
wanted
to
respond
to
that,
because
that
was
one
of
the
reasons.
I
said
that
the
housing
department
would
take
into
consideration
the
multiple
initiatives
that
we've
been
engaged
in,
and
so
we
have.
We
did
extensive
community
outreach
for
our
anti
displacement
project
where
we
had
community
groups
facilitate
meetings
that
we
were
invited
to.
We
did
not
actually
have
our
standard
meetings
because,
frankly,
you're
right,
nobody
was
coming
to
them
because
they
didn't
want
to
it.
D
Just
it
wasn't
a
way
that
was
effective
and
outreaching
to
especially
renter
communities,
who
didn't
have
the
time
or
weren't
connected
to
the
city
in
these
ways,
so
we
did
do
very
extensive
outreach
and,
frankly,
that
work
was
based
on
resident
perspective.
We
started
our
work.
We
were
very,
very
fortunate
to
have
a
grant
with
policyLink
and
we
had
partnerships
with
outside
community
groups
and
all
of
that
work
was
centered
around
community.
That's
how
it
started
we're
doing
some
more
extensive
outreach
on
our
fair
housing
side
and
so
I
absolutely
agree
with
you.
D
J
Very
much
David
Myer
from
Silicon
Valley
at
home,
one
small
follow-up
question
and
a
couple
of
quick
comments.
My
quick
follow-up
for
Jackie
was,
if
there's
any
thinking
about
when
the
the
timing
of
the
especially
the
housing
strategy
for
the
whole
Dee
SEP.
If
there's
a
I'm
targeted
for
that
and
then
just
just
real
quickly
a
couple
things.
J
If
we
have
more
units
that
we're
trying
to
get
in
there,
you
know
the
goal
is
set
higher
for
how
much
affordable
housing
that
we're
going
to
create,
and
so
I
really
appreciate
the
city
for
for
thinking
big
there.
The
other
thing
I
do
want
to
say
is
that
I
appreciate
that
some
of
the
the
questions
related
to
how
do
you
prioritize
funding
for
different
types
of
affordable
housing?
J
It's
it's
a
tough
question
that
the
city
was
posed
in
in
these
surveys
and
I
think
it's
great
that
they
were
opposing.
You
guys
are
opposing
those
questions,
because
they're
they're
really
important
when
we're
talking
about
limited
resources
and
and
I
think
that
I'm,
hoping
that
you
know,
as
we
kind
of
go
through
and
hear
more
about
kind
of
the
city's
approach.
I
know
that
the
city
is
constructing
its
affordable.
J
Housing
strives
to
be
looking
at
all
the
different
tools
that
they
have
to
create
different
levels
of
affordable
housing,
whether
it's
extremely
well
income
housing,
which
we
need
a
heck
of
a
lot
more
of
or
if
it's
looking
at
inclusionary
housing
for
low
income,
people
and
so
I
guess
I
would
just
say
that,
and
we
know
what
these
these
trade-offs
and
questions
about
about.
Resources
are
real.
We
appreciate
the
city
is
looking
at
them
and
we
hope
that
we'll
be
looking
at.
J
You
know
all
the
different
ways
that
we
can
not
really
make
these
into
binary
decisions
between
more
units,
higher
affordability
levels
or
or
less
units
at
lower
affordability
levels.
But
I
know
that
we'll
be
looking
at
a
mixture
of
those
things,
and
so
we
appreciate
that
and
I
think
it
is.
It
is
really
key,
as
we
think
about
the
stationary
itself
that,
obviously
you
know,
while
we
want
to
be
able
to
create
if
we
can
create
more
affordable
housing
outside
the
station
area.
That's
great.
J
We
need
more
affordable
housing
outside
the
station
area,
but
you
know
we're
investing
a
lot
of
resources
in
crane,
a
really
great
area
around
the
station
and
when
we're
talking
about
questions
of
equity
and
who
has
access
to
those
resources,
it's
obviously
going
to
be
important
that
we
make
sure
that
there
is
affordable
housing,
that's
actually
centered
in
the
station
area
and
that's
giving
people
access
to
to
those
those
great
resources
that
we're
going
to
be
building.
So
thank.
D
B
Thank
You
Jackie,
thank
you
David,
so
it
looks
like
we
have
one
more
comment
from
Harvey.
Then
I
noticed
that
we
are
now
up
to
what
we
anticipated
being
in
the
meeting
and
I
greatly
appreciate
all
your
patience.
I
know
this
has
been
a
long
meeting.
We
definitely
want
to
leave
room
for
public
comment
coming
up
next,
so
Harvey.
If
you
want
to
under
self
and
I.
A
Didn't
I
just
copied
North
Willow
Glen
Neighborhood
Association
throughout
the
sag
process,
I
asked
multiple
times
Google.
How
many
support
workers
are
you
going
to
have
I
know
you're
going
to
employ
20
up
to
20,000
knowledge
workers
that
will
have
high
salaries,
but
how
many
support
workers
will
you
need
and
where
will
they
be
out,
and
where
are
we
going
to
have
the
e
Li,
Li
and
Li
housing?
And
how
can
we
integrate
it
in
a
way
with
market
rate
housing
so
that
we
don't
end
up
with
communities
such
as
when
I
was
in
school?
A
Also
in
when
I
was
in
in
Chicago,
we
created
cabrini-green,
which
was
torn
down
so
I
want
to
make
sure
we
don't
do
that.
Then
I
have
one
other
thing
that
I
forgot
on
parts
is
the
quick
I?
Don't
want
a
response?
I
just
want
to
point
something
out.
The
park
presentation
did
not
make
good
connections
between
the
Los
Gatos
Creek
Trail
and
the.
A
B
Thank
You
Harvey.
Thank
you
for
that
and
again,
thank
you
all
so
much
members
of
the
Saab
for
your
time
and
your
input.
We
greatly
appreciate
it
and
now,
very
importantly,
we're
going
to
move
to
the
public
comment
section
where,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
we're
going
to
do
typically
how
it's
done
at
a
city
council,
meeting
I
do
have
a
little
timer
I
warn
you
I
accidentally
pulled
a
one-minute
timer,
not
knowing
how
many
folks
were
going
to
be
in
attendance
and
wanting
a
comment.
B
B
This
is
your
chance
to
also
call
in
and
provide
your
comments
and
the
caller
that
meeting
ID,
which
I
should
have
written
down
Jennifer
if
you're
there
I
have
here.
The
meeting
ID
is
9
1,
0,
6,
2,
8,
7,
7
2
2
for
those
that
might
want
that
way.
So
with
all
that
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
start
and
I
apologize
ahead
of
time
if
I
mispronounce
your
name
in
any
way
but
I'm
gonna
start
with
Catherine
hedges,
and
once
you
let
me
know
that
you
can
hear
us
I'm
going
to
start
your
timer.
C
E
G
E
E
B
F
Hi
Tom,
McCullar
and
I'm
currently
with
the
young
bee,
knows
enough.
Bay
and
I
am
also
a
former
member
of
the
North
San
Jose
task
force,
I
mean
now.
When
I
was
on
the
task
force,
they
showed
us
a
video
back.
Then
they
showed
us
a
video
of
first
street,
looking
like
Castro
Street
in
Mountain,
View
and
asking
us.
Would
you
like
to
have
this
and
everybody
said
yeah,
and
then
we
got.
F
Say
25
percent,
affordable
housing,
but
the
questionnaire
may
have
these
two
choices.
It
sounds
like
not
really
like
when
we're
on
the
task
force.
We
discovered
that
developers
could
pay
an
extra
fee
and
just
not
even
bother
with
affordable
housing.
So
you
know
I
want
to
know
what
are
you
really
committed
to?
How
come
you
can't
just
say
to
Google.
P
N
D
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
comment.
I
have
a
few
comments
and
suggestions
and
questions.
First,
it
regards
to
the
sequel
document.
If
staff
correct
me,
if
I'm
wrong
stuff
suggested
that
this
would
require
an
addendum,
a
IR
and
therefore
the
future
projects
within
the
area
when
required.
Supplemental
analyses,
however,
since
he
also
said
that
this
is
part
of
the
downtown
strategy
er,
which
was
completed
in
2014
with
those
future
projects
in
this
area
be
tearing
off
in
the
downtown
strategy.
D
In
addition,
the
reason
I'm
asking
is
because
the
2014
downtown
strategy
IR
does
not
consider
the
California
2017
scoping
plan
at
which,
as
you
know,
we're
trying
to
achieve
rght
reduction
goals
for
2030,
2045
and
2050.
In
addition,
the
type
of
secret
document
is
a
very,
very
important
component,
not
only
because
of
the
public
processes,
but
also
the
legal
requirements.
D
So
whether
you
do
an
addendum,
a
supplementary
IR,
a
draftee
IR,
the
public's
right
to
the
legal
process
is
very
distinct
and
the
public
compromises
we
don't
have
the
same
rights
depending
on
the
type
of
document
the
CETA
the
city
accomplishes
or
completes
right.
So
the
other
comment
and
suggestion
has
to
do
with
open
space
and
equity.
D
As
you
know,
with
COBIT
there
is
a
significant
closure
of
city
parks
and
so
because
of
overcrowding
or
other
reasons,
so
I
think
it's
very
significant
to
consider
in
the
environmental
analyses
and
the
draft
EIS
should
consider
that,
in
addition,
my
other
last
suggestion
in
regards
to
outreach
to
minorities
and
as
the
first-generation
mexican-american
expertise
in
sequa
and
knowledge
and
urban
planning,
I
think
when
you
hire
planners
who
are
bilingual
bicultural,
you
can
have
a
very
significant
increase
of
participation
because
we
are
bilingual.
We
understand
our
communities.
Thank
you.
E
Right
I'm
going
to
quote
my
husband,
so
I'd
really
like
to
take
four
minutes:
okay,
I
know:
that's
a
lot.
You
say
you
really
care
about
our
opinion.
You
jumped
okay,
so
I'm
gonna
take
two
minutes
for
my
husband,
I'll,
just
I'll
start
it
with
what
he
said
and
I'll
continue
it
with
what
Gretta
Sundberg
is
saying,
but
what
my
husband,
the
biologist
said,
is:
either
it's
demolition
or
it's
uncontrolled
demolition,
and
then
I
will
talk
to
you
about
what
Greta
Sundberg
says.
E
Okay,
so
I'm
going
to
read
that
and
then
I
want
the
other
two
minutes
for
myself
and
here's
the
climate
activists
Greta
Sundberg.
So
you
can
better
understand
here.
Let
me
see:
okay
here,
I
hit,
cancel
on
that
and
then
go
here
understand
what
she's
saying
she's
a
climate
activists
she's
16.
She
addressed
the
UN's
climate
action
summit
in
New,
York
City
on
Monday.
Here's,
the
full
transcript
of
Thunderbirds
speech,
beginning
with
her
response
to
a
question
about
the
message
she
has
for
the
world
leaders.
My
message
is
that
we'll
be
watching
you.
E
This
is
all
wrong
and
it's
all
wrong.
For
so
many
reasons
and
I'll
say
that
in
my
speech,
I
shouldn't
be
up
here:
I
should
be
back
in
school
on
the
other
side
of
the
ocean
yeah.
You
all
come
to
us
young
people
for
hope.
How
dare
you?
You
have
stolen
my
dreams
and
my
childhood
with
the
empty
words
and
yet
I
wanted
the
lucky
ones.
E
That's
all
it
is
that's
all
this
is
about
it's
because
you're
not
dealing
with
climate
change,
you're
not
dealing
with
that,
and
that
is
the
problem
and
you're
all
sitting
around
talking
about
economic
growth
and
how
dare
you
close
the
highway?
What
do
you
mean,
of
course
we
have
to
close
the
highway.
We
have
a
lot
of
things
to
do
and
a
lot
of
things
to
change
and
what
are
the
things
you're
not
changing.
Is
you
you're
doing
like
the
city
of
San
Jose,
you
put
us
at
the
end
of
the
meeting.
B
Tessa
I'm
sorry,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
we
cannot
have
any
there's,
unfortunately,
there's
probably
kids
watching
this
at
home
and
others
that
we
don't
want
to
be
offended
anymore.
So
we
appreciate
the
passion.
We
appreciate
your
input,
there'll
be
multiple
opportunities
for
you
to
continue
to
provide
in
the
foot.
So
thank
you
for
being
a
part
of
this
meeting.
Next
we're
gonna
move
to
Lauren's
Ames.
F
What
is
causing
it
to
be
unfeasible
is
that
hydrology
issues
is
that
there
are
too
many
fiber
optic
cables
in
the
place,
or
are
you
requiring
overly
generous
trail
clearances?
What
is
the
issue?
Maybe
we
can
find
some
engineering
solutions
to
it,
I'm
glad
that
you
have
the
lost
creak,
it's
an
off-road
corridor
and
there,
but
the
alignment
I've
seen
is
rather
jog
II
that
it
comes
up
to
Oz
array
and
then
it
goes
jogging
across
and
then
I'm
making
left
turns
and
right
turns
and
has
many
at
grade
crossings.
F
F
Also,
echo
Harvey's
comments
that
you
need
to
have
a
good
connection
from
Los
Gatos
Creek
trail
to
the
auto-pay,
River
Trail,
and
then
also
you
talked
about
open
space,
and
you
mentioned
the
arena
green
and
I'm
just
kind
of
wondering
how
much
land
will
still
be
available
to
the
public
after
the
icon
is
built
there,
how
much
of
the
land
is
going
to
be
given
over
to
that
icon
and
how
much
is
left
over
for
the
public.
Thank
you.
Those
are
my
questions.
M
Hi
I'm
bill
Rankin
I'm,
president
save
our
trails
and
president
of
the
North
Willow
Glen
Neighborhood
Association
and
also
a
member
of
dang
I've,
come
to
understand
that
a
new
concept
for
the
design
of
the
southern
approach
to
deer
Adhan
station
for
the
Los
Gatos
Creek
Trail
has
been
introduced.
The
original
idea
was
the
trail
heading
north
from
asura
I
would
cross
under
the
new
railroad
bridge
on
the
west
side
of
the
creek
to
continue
towards
the
station.
M
However,
that
railroad
bridge
ended
up
being
built
lower
to
the
river
than
expected
and
would
have
left
the
trail
underwater
for
several
weeks
during
the
normal,
a
banned
flow
of
the
river
during
the
rainy
season.
It
has
been
suggested
to
cross
the
Los
Gatos
Creek
on
asura
and
then
follow
the
river
along
the
east
side
until
it
reaches
Montgomery.
However,
in
my
opinion,
this
point
is
moved
with
the
eventual
raising
of
the
railroad
tracks
to
an
elevated
station
platform.
That
disc
has
called
for
that
railroad
bridge
will
need
to
be
removed.
M
I
think
the
city
should
continue
to
plan
on
the
trail
being
on
the
west
side
of
the
creek.
I
also
believe
that,
as
the
trail
approaches
Montgomery,
the
trail
should
go
under
Park
Avenue,
because
the
when
the
station
is
raised,
Park
Avenue
will
be
back
at
great
again.
This
will
allow
for
a
very
safe
pedestrian
bicycle
connection
to
dear
Adan.
I
also
would
like
to
see
the
connection
made
for
the
los
gatos
creek
trail
between
meridian
and
lincoln.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
B
B
F
So
I'm
actually
extremely
glad
to
be
right
behind
bill,
because
I
got
some
great
news
for
you,
so
we
put
the
shelter
in
place
to
good
use
and
we
started
working
full-time
on
the
station
and
the
first
thing
we
obviously
had
to
do
was
to
lift
it
and
we
lifted
it.
And
then
we
started
resolving
all
the
issues
in
the
north
with
Santa,
Clara
and
obviously
the
connection
to
Bart,
which
is
very
important
and
I'm
glad
to
tell
you
that
was
resolved.
F
We
did
that
in
de
April
timeframe
and
then
we
turn
our
attention
to
the
south
and
the
southern
half
of
the
station
is
now
just
as
important
as
a
northern.
Half
Park
is
just
as
important
as
Santa
Clara
and
the
historical
building.
This
beautiful
background
behind
ahead
with
nothing's
gonna
happen
to
that
it's
gonna
be
exactly
the
way
this
something
might
happen
in
the
background
is
behind
it,
but
that's
an
old
story.
F
We
then
started
going
south
and
guess
what
we
did.
A
great
separation
all
the
way
and
the
input
bill
is
giving
us
on
the
Los
Gatos
tikrit
rails
is
very
useful.
The
one
thing
we
disagree
with
with
Bill
on
is
that
we
believe
that
the
cars
will
continue
to
be
depressive
Clark,
but
now
the
area
that's
cannot
be
open
used
by
the
tracks
would
actually
be
open
space,
so
people
will
be
walking
right
across
parks
without
having
any
interference
with
traffic.
So
I
got
30
seconds.
Let
me
just
wrap
up
here.
F
Yes,
I'm
phasing.
First
of
all,
we
have
a
fully
working
station
in
the
south
before
we
go
up
north
and
go
and
blow
everything
up,
and
we
are
about
to
share
our
good
work
with
our
friend
Jessica
DLT
and
the
Google
and
show
all
these
elements
tied
together
and
we're
gonna
be
able
to
show
you
digitization,
actually
walk
you
to
the
station
and.
B
S
S
But
I
did
want
to
comment
on
the
fact
that
we
have
been
through
in
the
last
week
or
two
a
little
revolution
in
San
Jose
with
the
black
and
brown
lives
matter
movement
in
the
last
in
the
last
week,
or
so
there
must
have
been
about
a
thousand
people
who
testified
at
City
Council
meetings,
ninety-five
percent
of
them
calling
for
defending
the
police
and
I.
Think.
S
Worse,
not
going
to
have
a
adverse
impact
on
equity,
but
have
a
positive,
and
in
order
to
do
that,
we
have
to
have
an
equity
framing
to
this
whole
thing
and
I
I
didn't
hear
I
again,
I
miss
Kim's
comments,
but
I
didn't
hear
it
in
the
general
discussion
that
was
taking
place
in
the
meeting
in
the
past.
I've
talked
about
housing
and
homelessness.
Heard
people
talk
about
safety
in
this
service
and
again
we
can't
deal
with
homeless
people
in
terms
of
calling
the
police.
That's
not
an
effective
strategy.
S
B
F
E
E
But
this
process
is
not
about
capturing
my
perspective
as
a
white
guy
who's
solidly
middle-class
voices
like
mine,
and
perhaps
some
of
the
folks
on
here
tonight
are
pretty
well
represented
in
the
process,
so
I
think
Dave
for
inviting
ideas
from
all
of
you
tonight
on
reaching
unheard
underrepresented.
Stakeholders
and
I
want
to
thank
the
city
for
saying
partner
with
nonprofits
to
help
engage
these
underrepresented
audiences
that
we
talked
about
tonight
of
the
seven
groups
displayed
earlier
in
the
presentation
tonight.
E
We
have
a
church,
a
community
based
organization
in
the
Mayfair
neighborhood,
one
focused
on
serving
latina
Latino
businesses,
another
the
african-american
community
and
a
music
folk,
focused
group
and
as
the
executive
director
of
catalyzed
SV
I
can
tell
you
we're.
Also
one
of
those
seven
groups.
I
can
say
that
well,
we're
a
broad-based
organization
were
not
diverse
enough
to
capture
the
views
of
underrepresented,
orgs
that
the
city
of
San
Jose
has
been
targeting.
So
we're
designing
workshops
with
other
community-based
organizations
that
are
focused
on
two
populations,
usually
not
part
of
the
process.
E
The
Vietnamese
community
and
the
arts
and
creative
community,
which
the
survey
results
presented
tonight
show,
is
an
important
focus
for
the
respondents.
So
the
goal
is
to
create
an
avenue
for
engagement
for
those
not
part
of
this
process.
Right
now,
and
we
welcome
the
sags
ideas
on
how
to
do
engagement,
especially
during.
B
B
M
You
thank
you
for
the
words
from
sandy
pareo
is
nice
to
hear
tonight
with
the
MTC
Dao
involved.
I
hope
the
San
Jose
in
Bay,
Area
CHS,
are
can
become
a
process
for
good
thought
and
different
options
can
now
be
more
open
and
shared.
These
different
options
can
include
the
CHS
are
to
Tracy
with
an
SF
art
line
to
Tracy
and
some
interesting
East
Bay,
mass
transit
and
public
transit
connections
in
between
this
can
also
have
less
San
Jose
SF
Nissa
housing
displacement
issues
as
well
in
good
practices.
M
Precoded
19,
I
didn't
quite
hear
Jackie's
speech
tonight,
but
the
VTA
and
City
San
Jose
may
be
asking
around
what
can
be
extremely
low,
very
low
and
mixed
income
housing
again
and
in
the
important
issues
of
Digital
Inclusion.
At
this
time,
in
San,
Jose
are
based
on
a
massive
push,
broadband
and
vision,
zero
technology
by
the
federal
government
in
the
days
after
Koba
19,
it
could
be
clearer.
It
should
be
clear.
M
Good
open
public
policies
need
a
better
needs,
a
better
seat
at
the
table
and
how
to
address
the
importance
of
Digital
Inclusion,
the
ideas
of
equity
and
to
help
bridge
the
digital
divide
in
San
Jose.
It
simply
must
be
respected
and
talked
about
how
minimal
east
practices
can
accomplish
just
about
as
much
as
the
work
of
over
saturation
and
over
deployment
of
broadband
in
local
neighborhoods
at
this
time.
I'm.
Sorry,
if
my
words
may
be
uncomfortable,
I'm,
actually
trying
to
build
bridges,
I'm
ready
to
admit
the
good
I
hope.
M
We
are
ready
to
admit
that
good,
open
public
policy
can
have
a
helpful
important
part
in
the
still
very
expend
all
experimental
ideas
of
Digital
Inclusion
and
the
ideas
of
positive
long-term
community
health
and
sustainability.
Please
remember
it
is
good,
open
guidelines,
good
legal
precedents
and
good
public
policies
at
the
local
level
across
the
country
at
this
time,
there's
an
important
factor
now
to
help
open
up
many
important,
positive
democratic
practices,
practices
and
the
ideas
of
long-term
sustainability.
To
conclude,
I
hope
he's
becoming
clear.
M
The
ideas
of
equity
can
offer
a
positive
focus
and
many
ideas
of
a
good
community
future
and
a
good
roadmap
and
the
decisions
can
be
made
in
a
now
koban
19
City
budget
for
the
next
few
years.
Finally,
with
the
many
good
human
rights
and
civil
right
guidelines,
practices
and
ideals
at
the
local
level,
that
could
continually
ask
for
the
better.
M
E
To
hear
a
lot
of
people
talk
about
how
we
are
making
things
harder
on
low-income
people.
Well,
I
live
in
Gardner
I
live
50,
deep
on
the
tracks,
less
than
half
a
mile
from
where
Google
will
be.
The
people
in
my
neighborhood
are
really
not
renters
anymore,
at
least
not
the
low-income.
These
people
have
been
here
for
a
generation
or
two.
We
have
three
generations
living
in
some
houses
and
the
reality
is
they're
selling
their
homes
they're,
making
the
decision
to
do
it
and
they're
moving
away
and
we're
having
new
homes
built.
E
So
we
we
shouldn't,
be
thinking
about
poor
higher
rents
affecting
these
people
that
live
near
all
of
all
of
deer.
Don
I
mean
these
people
are
moving
on
their
own
accord.
Already.
The
one
thing
I'd
like
to
see
done
better
is
talking
more
about.
The
building
heights
seems
like
we're.
Considering
going
up
an
additional
200
feet,
it's
really
gonna
affect
the
skyline
in
my
neighborhood.
You
know
poor
us,
but
at
the
same
time
it
would
be
nice
to
hear
more
transparency
on
it
and
just
tell
us
what's
going
on.
Thank
you.
B
E
You,
my
name
is
Jean
Dresden
I'm
with
San
Jose,
Parks
advocates,
and
so
a
few
points
tonight.
The
survey
was
very
misleading
to
the
community
by
focusing
exclusively
on
the
community
center,
and
it
did
not
include
a
discussion
of
parks
and
open
space
and
the
interface
between
city
plans
and
goals
and
the
potential
downtown
West
plans
that
have
been
submitted
and
we
still
do
not
have
a
clear
understanding
whether
or
not
new
residents
will
have
adequate
public
space.
We
learned
from
kovat
that
small
pocket
parks
are
inadequate
and
we
need
to
have
that
in
mind.
E
E
We
are
concerned
that
there
seems
to
be
duplicated
efforts
with
the
Gardiner
community
center
nearby
that
has
wonderful
facilities,
but
is
not
staff
and
is
not
serving
the
nearby
neighborhood.
The
D
SAP
neighborhood
is
the
enrollment
area
for
the
elementary
school
that
is
adjacent
to
Gardiner,
Community
Center,
so
we
think
it's
duplicated
and
with
Google's
expressed
offers
of
community
space,
the
city
should
be
an
exploring
joint
partnerships
that
may
meet
most
of
those
needs.
E
E
B
You
Thank
You
Jean,
okay,
thank
you
all
again
for
spending
your
evening
with
us
members
of
the
public.
I
know
that
was
a
long
wait.
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
very
quickly
what
the
next
steps
are
in
the
process.
In
terms
of
acute
community
engagement,
we
are
hoping
to
meet
with
you
all
again
in
September
and
will
be
in
touch
with
that
exact
date.
B
C
I,
just
really
want
to
emphasize
that
one
of
the
the
reasons
to
have
the
SAG
and
the
reason
it
was
constructed
as
it
was,
was
because
each
of
you
have
access
to
important
networks,
and
so,
if
I'm
going
to
follow
up
with
some
of
you
who
spoke
on
this
this
afternoon.
But
I
just
want
you
to
know
that
the
city
staff
is
really
committed
to
community
engagement
like
real
community
engagement,
and
we
are
willing
to
go
anyplace
anywhere
to
listen.
C
So
if
you
have
ideas
about
how
you
can
help
us
engage
with
important
communities
who
you
feel
are
are
not
being
heard
at
this
point
and
whose
voices
are
critical,
we
really
want
to
partner
with
you
as
sag
members
on
that.
So
just
thanks.
Everybody
for
a
really
really
good
meeting
and
really
active
participation.