►
From YouTube: APR 9, 2018 | Station Area Advisory Group
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Everyone
we're
gonna,
get
started
thanks
for
everyone
getting
here
and
just
a
few
different
announcements.
I
mentioned
that
we
do
overflow
in
the
council
chambers.
So
if
there's
not
seating
here,
we
do
have
people
outside.
So
if
the
room
gets
filled,
they
will
point
people
over
to
the
council
chambers
and
then
can
I
get
one
of
the
interpreters
up
just
to
make
the
announcement.
B
A
Thank
you
very
much,
so
we
are
rolling
live
in
this
meeting
and
council
chambers,
as
I
mentioned
last
time,
because
we're
not
in
the
middle
of
a
Planning
Commission
meeting.
This
meeting
is
being
televised
on
channel
26
as
well
as
live
on
the
website
and
being
tweeted
out
by
our
communication
staff.
If
you
a
little
bit
more
logistics
before
we
dive
in
three
things.
A
First
public
comment:
you're
gonna,
see
that
last
on
the
agenda
again
in
the
last
meeting,
I
told
you
I
was
going
to
be
moving
that
up,
but
once
we
ended
the
last
meeting,
both
Dave
and
I,
heard
from
several
of
the
community
members
in
the
audience
that
they
liked
it.
At
the
end,
they
wanted
an
opportunity
to
be
able
to
speak
on
what
was
said
in
this
meeting
by
you
all,
but
also
staff
and
the
presenters.
So
because
we
have
fairly
robust
agenda
today,
where
we're
making
some
decisions
and
everything
is
a
little
bit.
A
Meaty
I'm
gonna,
keep
it
at
the
end
again.
So
the
community
has
an
opportunity
to
comment
on
any
one
of
these
issues
and
again
we
can
revisit
that
again
later
and
in
future
meetings
depending
on
the
agenda.
We
do
have
a
lot
on
the
agenda
today.
One
thing
that
I
want
to
make
clear
that
it
was
my
fault
in
the
last
meeting.
We
didn't
do
a
very
good
job,
as
Dave
and
I
facilitate
tonight
really
important
for
the
people
behind
us,
the
people
on
TV.
A
You
know
the
thousands
that
are
watching
tonight
that
when
we
call
on
you
that
you
state
your
name
and
what
organization
you're
from
so
everyone
knows
who
you
are
and
who
you're
speaking
for
so
I'll
do
a
better
job
of
reminding
avala
all
that
tonight.
But
if
you
can
kind
of
remember
that
as
well,
that'd
be
great
and
then,
lastly,
before
we
jump
in
before
we
move
forward,
we
do
need
approval
of
the
meeting
minutes
from
the
last
meeting.
So
if
I
can
get
a
motion
from
someone
on.
A
D
A
F
Thank
you
very
much,
Lee
great
to
see
you
all
again.
Thank
you
again
for
being
here.
So
the
agenda
for
tonight's
meeting
is
to
review
the
summary
notes,
as
we
did
last
time,
we'll
do
that
at
the
beginning
of
every
meeting,
just
to
make
sure
that
we
got
most
your
feedback
or
hopefully,
all
your
feedback
from
the
last
meeting
and
kind
of
set.
The
baseline
for
this
meeting
and
other
meetings
coming
up.
We're
gonna
have
a
presentation
of
the
Brown
Act
and
city
sunshine
ordinance
from
this
city.
F
So
you
all
get
trained
up
on
that
here
tonight,
which
I
know
you're
all
super
excited
about
we're
also
gonna
have
members
of
Google
here
and
Joe
in
particular,
to
take
us
through
the
designs,
principles
and
inspiration
of
Google
right
now
kind
of
what
inspires
them
just
to
kind
of
set
a
general
baseline,
we'll
have
a
conversation
about
that
as
well.
We're
not
gonna
be
talking
about
anything
specific
project
related,
but
just
inspirations
design
principles
that
have
set
that
stage.
We're
also
going
to
talk
about
existing
conditions.
F
F
We
really
want
to
get
to
the
solution
groups
and
have
a
discussion
about
the
solution
groups
to
really
define
what
those
topics
are,
so
that
we
can
then
move
in
to
start
to
schedule
those
solution,
group
meetings
and
talk
a
little
about
the
structure
of
those
meetings
and
what
we
hope
to
get
out
of
them.
As
Lee
mentioned,
we
have
the
public
comment
and
then
we'll
talk
about
next
steps
and
a
meeting
scheduled
coming
up
so
I
also
promised
C
that
we'll
always
start
with
the
group
agreements.
F
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
all
create
a
safe
space,
a
space
that
we
could
all
communicate
freely,
but
then
also
respect
each
other
and
bring
your
opinions
to
the
table
freely.
We
printed
them
out
and
have
them
on
the
wall.
They'll
be
at
every
meeting.
I
will
go
through
them
all
again.
My
favorite
again
is
to
have
fun
and
make
new
friends.
That's
really
what
we're
here
to
do.
So,
please
keep
that
in
mind
as
we
go
forward.
So
with
that
summary
notes
from
zag
meeting
number
one.
F
We
talked
a
lot
about
the
process.
What
activities
are
going
to
be
happening
outside
of
just
the
SOG
meetings?
We'll
talk
about
a
little
bit
more
today,
but
we
want
to
just
recognize.
We
talked
about
walking
groups
a
pop-up
workshop,
so
we
actually
go
out
to
meetings
where
people
are
citywide
workshops
and
obviously
the
solution
groups
being
a
big
one
and
in
between
we're
hoping
to
do
surveys.
So
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
that.
We
talked
about
how
we're
gonna
synthesize
the
solution,
group
meetings
and
we'll
talk
about
that
again
tonight.
F
What
the
final
report
looks
like
and
that's
definitely
still
evolving
what
the
city
can
provide
in
terms
of
community
benefits,
will
that'll
be
coming
up
in
future
and
subsequent
meetings
as
well.
We
also
talked
about
the
existing
conditions.
Information
a
lot
a
huge
list
here:
you'll
you'll,
see
a
lot
of
it
in
tonight's
discussion,
but
we're
consistently
gathering
information
we'll
be
bringing
more
back
to
you
as
we
go
through
this
process.
This
is
an
example
of
some
of
what
we
heard
so
I
didn't
want
to
spend
a
whole
lot
of
time
on
this
upfront.
F
Part
I
just
wanted
to
bring
it
back
to
you
of
the
information
we
gathered
last
time.
Is
there
anything
that
we
might
have
missed
or
any
general
input
folks
want
to
provide
at
this
point
before
we
move
forward
all
right,
excellent,
wait
that
we're
gonna
go
ahead
and
move
forward.
Then
so
I'm
gonna
ask
ed
to
come
up
and
give
you.
Yes,
you
can
sit
up
here
or
you
can
either
way
okay,
so
this
is
Edie.
G
G
Okay,
can
you
hear
me
now
yeah,
okay,
so
again,
as
I
said:
I'm
ed,
Moran,
I'm,
the
assistant
city
attorney
for
San,
Jose
and
I'm
going
to
be
providing
you
with
some
general
information
about
the
Brown
Act
and
some
other
conflict
of
interest,
laws
that
apply
to
boards
and
commissions
and,
as
I
said,
some
of
this
may
be
review
for
some
of
you
and
it
may
be
new
information.
But
it's
important
that
all
our
boards
and
commission
members
understand
the
Brown
Act
and
some
of
the
other
rules
that
apply
to
legislative
bodies.
G
So
the
Brown
Act
is
a
state
law.
It's
a
law
that
was
imposed
on
local
jurisdictions
by
the
state
legislature.
It
requires
that
all
meetings
are
government
bodies
must
be
open
to
the
public.
The
city's
boards
and
commissions
must
deliberate.
It
act
in
a
public
business
openly.
These
exceptions
to
the
rule
are
few
and
very
narrowly
construed.
This
allows
the
public
to
be
informed
in
to
participate
in
the
decisions
and
the
actions
of
the
local
government.
G
The
Brown
Act
applies
to
any
any
legislative
body
decision-making
or
advisory
and
includes
boards
commissions
and
subcommittees.
Thus,
this
means
that
this
commission
is
subject
to
the
Brown
Act,
the
legislative
body.
The
City
Council
created
this
body
and
the
City
Council
decided
that
certain
organizations
would
be
represented
on
the
on
this
board
and
as
a
result
of
that
decision,
this
particular
body
became
a
legislative
body
subject
to
the
Brown
Act.
G
G
No
action
needs
to
be
taken
in
order
for
it
to
be
considered
a
meeting,
a
hearing,
discussion
or
deliberation
triggers
the
Brown
Act
open
meeting
requirements
in
the
past.
The
legislation
used
to
say
when
action
is
taken.
That
particular
part
of
the
code
was
changed
to
say
even
if
you're
just
listening,
if
the,
if
a
majority
of
you
are
together
and
you're,
listening
to
a
particular
action,
then
you're,
subject
to
the
Brown
Act,
and
there
are
some
exceptions
that
I'll
explain
in
a
couple
of
slides.
G
The
majority
of
members
may
attend
any
social
or
ceremonial
occasion
conference
community
forums
and
meetings
of
other
government
bodies
as
long
as
they
do
not
discuss
government
business
events
not
considered
meetings
or
the
following
conferences,
training
workshops,
community
forums,
meetings
of
other
government
bodies
that
you
may
sit
on
social
and
ceremonial
occasions.
It
will
not
be
considered
a
meeting
so
long
as
a
majority
of
members
aren't
talking
to
together
taking
part
in
the
decision-making
process
for
their
Commission.
G
Under
the
Brown
Act,
there
are
prohibited
meetings.
A
majority
of
members
may
not
use
telephones,
landline
or
mobile,
fax
machines,
emails
text,
messages,
human
intermediaries
or
other
means
to
develop
a
decision,
each
which
involves
less
than
majority
of
members,
but
which
overall,
involve
a
contact
I'm
among
a
majority
of
the
members,
though,
that
would
be
strictly
prohibited.
A
majority
of
members
cannot
use
a
cell
phone
telephone,
fax,
email
or
other
devices
to
discuss
deliberate
or
develop
a
consensus
agreement
or
a
decision.
This
discussion
should
occur
at
an
agendized
public
meeting.
G
Prohibited
meetings
include
serial
meetings.
A
serial
meeting
is
a
series
of
meetings
to
discuss,
deliberate
or
take
action,
each
of
which
involves
less
than
a
majority
of
members,
but
which,
taken
together,
involve
a
majority
of
Commissioners.
The
following
are
not
considered
illegal
meetings,
attorney-client
communications,
one-way
communications
by
staff
to
individual
commissioners
or
a
communication
from
a
commissioner
to
a
staff
member.
G
This
is
one
of
the
ones.
These
are
this
particular
these
modes
of
communications
are
what
causes
a
lot
of
legislative
bodies
to
have
problems
in
that
you
have
members
of
a
committee
Commissioner
aboard
or
legislative
body.
In
particular,
those
bodies
that
are
made
up
of
five,
seven
or
even
in
our
council
eleven
members,
it's
very
easy
for
a
couple
of
members
of
that
legislative
body
to
start
talking
about
an
item
and
not
realize
that
they're
also,
then
one
of
them
will
speak
to
another
one
another
member
and
before
you
know
it.
G
You've
spoken
to
women
of
the
members
of
the
legislative
body.
Again,
this
body
is,
is
large
enough
that
that
may
not
occur,
but
you
need
to
be
aware,
because,
just
because
you
don't
speak
to
more
than
one
or
two
people,
it's
not.
You
can't
be
certain
that
those
two
or
three
people
haven't
spoken
to
other
members
as
well.
G
Agenda
items
agendas
must
include
the
following
requirements:
a
brief
description
of
every
item
to
be
discussed.
The
description
must
be
clear
enough
for
the
public
to
understand
what
is
going
to
be
discussed.
Agendas
for
regular
meetings
must
include
a
time
for
public
comment.
However,
we
recommend
public
comment
time
to
be
included
on
all
agendas,
even
for
special
meetings.
Again,
as
you
heard
from
Lee
the
there
is
supposed
to
be
a
time
for
a
public
comment
that
could
be
at
the
beginning.
G
It
could
be
at
the
end,
but
in
addition
to
that,
public
members
are
allowed
to
have
make
comments
on
any
individual
item
separate
from
the
general
public
comment,
and
it
is
important
that
your
agendas
describe
what
item
is
going
to
be
discussed
or
taken
action
so
that
the
public
can
determine
whether
or
not
he
or
she
wants
to
attend
the
meeting?
It
has
to
be
specific
enough
so
that
he
or
she
understands
what
the
topic
is
about.
G
The
Commission
should
not
discuss
items
that
are
not
posted
on
the
posted
agenda.
Commissioners
can't
comment
on
certain
nogen
dyes,
dye
tamang,
as
there
is
no
discussion
or
action.
You
can
briefly
respond
to
a
public
comment.
You
can
ask
a
question
for
clarification.
You
can
refer
an
item
to
a
staff
or
a
future
meeting.
You
can
have
a
brief
report
by
a
commissioner
on
his
or
her
activities
and
you
can
have
brief
announcements.
Those
are
the
general
exceptions
to
the
prohibition
on
Commission
members,
not
discussing
any
item
that
is
not
on
the
agenda.
G
G
This
particular
chart
shows
what
the
Brown
Act
requirements
are
for
posting
and
notice.
It
also
shows
you
that
the
city
has
an
additional
policy
dealing
with
sunshine.
Those
are
additional
procedures
that
the
City
Council
has
imposed
on
the
city
itself,
in
addition
to
any
Brown
Act
requirements
and
the
Sunshine
rules
for
posting
and
notices
also
applied
to
this
particular
body.
Although
most
other
sunshine,
ordinances
and
regulations
don't
apply
to
this
body,.
G
You
should
also
understand
that
under
the
Brown
Act,
the
state
also
imposes
civil
and
criminal
penalties.
If
the
Brown
Act
is
violated,
the
Commission
may
be
civilly
sued
and
may
be
liable
for
costs
and
attorneys
fees.
Violation
of
Braddock
may
also
be
a
misdemeanor
if
a
member
participates
in
a
commission
action
with
the
wrongful
intent
to
deprive
the
public
of
any
information,
and
that
usually
occurs
when
a
member
of
the
body
is
admonished
that
continuing
to
take
particular
action
would
be
a
violation
of
the
Brown
Act
and
that
particular
member
continues
to
take
that
action.
G
I'm
gonna
just
generally
mention
that
there
is
something
called
a
political
reform
act.
It's
generally
called
the
FPPC.
It's
also
a
state
law
that
imposes
certain
additional
requirements
to
try
to
avoid
conflicts
of
interest.
Members
of
legislative
bodies
in
general
that
particular
legislation
doesn't
apply
to
this
body
for
two
reasons:
one
you're,
an
advisory
body
and
so
you're,
not
a
decision-making
body,
unlike
the
Planning
Commission,
or
the
appeals,
hearing
board
or
other
bodies
of
the
city
that
do
make
decisions.
G
And
second,
you
were
specifically
chosen
because
you're
a
stakeholder,
so
it
was
clear
that
you
did
have
some
type
of
in
special
interest
that
the
council
felt
was
important
as
a
part
of
this
body,
and
so
the
FPPC
doesn't
apply
to
this
group.
Unless
you
as
an
individual,
become
under
the
cities
under
the
city's
rules
would
be
considered
a
lobbyist
and
then
you
would
have
lobbyist
regulations
that
would
apply
to
you
that
our
would
also
be
part
of
the
FPPC.
J
K
G
A
G
G
So
all
of
you
can
show
up,
majority
of
you
can
show
up,
and
that
would
not
be
a
Braun
Act
violation.
You
wouldn't
have
to
post
it
as
a
meeting
of
this
particular
group,
but,
as
was
stated,
if
you
meet
before
and
you
don't
post
a
meet
a
meeting
notice
that
you're
going
to
talk
about
who's,
gonna
go
or
what
you're
gonna
say
at
the
meeting,
or
if
you
decide
at
the
meeting
that
you
all
need
to
talk
about
something
that
you
heard.
A
G
That's
one
of
the
issues:
that's
a
problem
because,
depending
on
how
many
Facebook
friends
you
have
and
how
often
that
particular
posting
is
going
to
be
sent
or
read
by
other
members
of
this
particular
body,
that
could
create
a
problem
because
again,
if
somebody
then
reads
it
and
then
sends
it
to
somebody
else
and
says,
oh
by
the
way,
did
you
know
that
so-and-so
is
going?
Are
you
going
that's
the
problem
with
social
media
and
and
the
communication
about
an
item
that
is
subject
that
is
the
subject
of
this
commission?
G
G
G
That
in
and
of
itself
potentially
be
a
problem
right
so
announcing
a
meeting
is
not
a
problem.
It's
a
question
of
what
you
get
as
a
result
of
the
announcement,
because
you
could
get
comments
and
if
you
get
comments
from
your
constituents,
that's
not
the
issue.
The
issue
is
whether
you
get
comments
from
other
members
of
this
particular
body.
G
Thank
you,
the
yeah
McGann,
as
I
said.
Just
generally,
you
may
have
no
intention
of
it
going
beyond
one
particular
area,
but
unfortunately
we
have
seen
circumstances
in
which
that
particular
comment
was
then
sent
and
other
members
of
a
legislative
body
heard
about
it,
made
comments
and
again,
as
I
said,
it's
not
a
question
of
getting
a
consensus.
It's
a
question
of
hearing
and
discussing
a
particular
item
that
would
come
before
this
body
came.
D
O
K
Steve
McMahon
with
the
SANS
Unified
School
District's
I,
want
to
be
clear
on
the
train,
so
I
get
the
answer
to
the
quiz
correct,
it's
okay
for
all
of
us
to
attend
because
you
are
noticing
it
publicly.
If
you
have,
if
the
city
wasn't
noticing
it
and
the
majority
of
us
came,
and
it
was
specifically
discussing
something
that's
under
this
group's
purview,
we
should
not
be
attending
correct.
G
Because
the
meeting
you're
attending
is
already
publicly
noticed
for
that
particular
body,
it's
a
public
meeting
that
you're
attending.
So
any
comment
you
make
will
be
able
to
be
considered
by
the
public
if
it
was
a
private
meeting
and
it
wasn't
a
public
body
and
it
wasn't
noticed,
then
you
would
have
to
notice
this
particular
body's
attendance
at
that
private
me.
But.
K
K
G
To
that
particular
requirement,
if
the
other
meeting
you're
attending
is
a
publicly
noticed
meeting
you
can
hear,
but
if
you
are
taking
action
or
discussing
that
part
of
it
as
a
majority
of
your
meeting
that
part
of
it
has
to
be
noticed,
but
if
you're
simply
attending
another
publicly
noticed
meeting,
you
can
sit
and
listen.
You
can
sit.
You
can
comment
on
it
so
long
as
you're,
not
acting
or
in
in
a
manner
where
a
majority
of
this
body
is
is
deliberating
at
that
meeting.
That's
the
exception
to
the
general
prohibition.
G
A
You
I'm
gonna
move
us
along
two
things.
First,
this
is
a
good
kind
of
high
level
training
on
what
the
Brown
Act
is
Dave
and
I's
facilitators,
lauren,
Haley
and
I.
You
know,
as
staff
are
gonna,
be
very
practical
in
the
future
about
how
this
applies
and
when
we're
running
into
in
a
situation.
We're
gonna
talk
a
little
bit
about
how
the
Brown
Act
is
going
to
affect
the
solution
groups.
A
G
Yeah
I
just
have
also
one
more
comment.
Many
of
you
represent
organizations
and
that
the
fact
that
you
represent
an
organization
doesn't
limit
your
organization's
ability
to
continue
its
efforts
at
meeting
with
council
members
meeting
with
the
city
manager
separate,
and
apart
from
the
fact
that
you
represent
that
organization
in
this
group.
There
is,
though,
a
limitation
as
to
whether
any
member
of
this
particular
group
can
lobby
the
City
Council
or
the
staff
with
regard
to
any
particular
matter
that
comes
before
this
board.
So
just.
P
H
G
A
A
Quickly,
because
we
have
a
bunch
of
people
standing
and
on
the
floor,
we
do
have
about
a
dozen
or
two
dozen
people
in
council
chambers
watching
this
live
they're
filling
out
card,
so
they
have
the
ability
to
to
speak
during
public
comment.
If
any
of
you
would
like
to
be
more
comfortable,
so
be
it
you're
perfectly
welcome
where
you're
at,
but
if
you
would
like
to
actually
have
a
seat
and
watch
this
council
chambers
is
right
down
the
hall
and
with
that
I'm
gonna
turn
it
over
to
Michael
Flynn
from
Google.
For
the
next
topic.
C
K
Q
First
of
all,
I'd
like
to
start
by
thanking
the
city
of
San
Jose
and
in
this
body,
or
allowing
us
the
time
to
present
on
this
very
important
project.
The
purpose
of
our
presentation
is
to
share
our
vision
and
our
principles
for
creating
place.
This
is
the
beginning
of
a
long
journey
and
we're
very
excited
to
start
this
process
with
you
tonight.
We
have
three
members
of
our
team
here
for
the
presentation.
Q
You've
already
heard,
I'm
Marco
and
vice
president
of
real
estate
and
development
for
Google
I
have
a
substantial
involvement
with
the
city
of
San
Jose,
both
professionally
and
personally,
professionally.
I
was
global
head
of
real
estate
at
Cisco,
which
is
the
city's
largest
private
employer
and
frequently
engaged
with
the
city.
In
that
capacity,
and
personally
I
was
a
13
year
resident
of
the
city
of
San
Jose.
Q
We
also
have
Javier
Gonzalez
government
affairs
and
public
policy
manager
for
Google
Javier
was
born
in
San
Jose
and
raised
downtown
in
the
Guadalupe
Washington
neighborhood
area
near
Virginia,
Avenue
palm
Street.
He
attended
local
schools
and
worked
as
a
policy
and
community
affairs
aide
to
several
state
and
local
policymakers,
xavier,
and
I
will
be
available
during
the
Q&A
session
of
this
presentation.
Q
Finally,
we
have
Joe
van
bellen
senior
director
of
development
for
Google.
Joe
will
be
giving
the
presentation
today
Joe's
a
relatively
recent
addition
to
Google
and
we
are
excited
to
have
him
join.
Our
team
swear
that
you
find
a
senior
leader,
that's
a
natural
fit
with
your
beliefs,
values
and
approaches.
He's
passionate
about
the
triple
bottom
line,
an
idea
that
believes
a
project
only
succeeds
if
it
meets
its
environmental,
social
and
economic
objectives.
Q
Joe
is
a
co-owner
and
founder
of
windmill
development
and
is
also
a
senior
developer
at
lend-lease,
one
of
the
foremost
developers
of
large
mixed-use
projects
in
the
world.
He
is
one
of
the
leaders
in
the
green
building
movement,
where
Ava's
a
founder
of
the
Canadian
Green
Building
Council,
and
served
as
a
director
of
the
US
Green
Building
Council,
the
Green
Building
Council's,
one,
the
fast
growing
nonprofits
in
the
world
and
developed
a
lead
rating
system
which
has
become
the
standard
for
green
buildings.
Worldwide.
Q
Joe's
development
milestones
include
the
first
LEED
Gold
building
in
Canada
and
the
first
LEED
Platinum
market
residential
building
built
in
the
world.
His
impact
was
so
great
that
he
received
a
Lifetime
Achievement
Award
from
the
Canadian
Green
Building
Council
for
exceptional
leadership
in
2010,
in
addition
to
his
numerous
accomplishments
in
the
green
building,
space
Joe
worked
on
large-scale
mixed-use
projects
such
as
bran
guru
and
Sidney,
an
elephant
castle
in
London,
where
he
developed
a
reputation
as
an
innovator
in
areas
such
as
job
training,
community
engagement,
district
utility
systems
and
use
of
innovative
building
techniques.
Q
You'll
hear
more
about
this.
During
his
presentation
before
hand,
things
off
to
Joe
I
just
wanted
to
state
how
important
the
partnership
approach
is
going
to
be
to
this
project.
We
believe
that
working
with
the
community
in
the
city
to
collectively
find
win-win
solutions
to
our
challenges,
yields
the
best
results
for
here
to
listen,
and
we
look
forward
to
engaging
with
you
all
in
this
manner.
Thank
you,
Joe.
H
Thank
you,
Mark,
and
thanks
for
having
me
here
today,
as
Marcus
said,
I'm,
very
passionate
about
developments
that
are
socially
and
ecologically
and
economically
responsible
and
I've
dedicated
my
last
20
years
to
that,
but
for
the
first
10
years
of
my
career.
Sadly,
I
didn't
really
focus
on
those
areas
and
when
I
look
back
for
the
reason,
why
is
when
I
went
to
university
and
trained
as
a
businessman?
He
kind
of
got
this
impression
that
being
good
to
society
and
and
the
environment
was
a
cost
of
business.
H
So
when
I
left
University
I
didn't
really
focus
on
these
areas,
but
about
20
years
ago,
through
some
soul-searching,
I
read
a
book
called
natural
capitalism
by
Paul
Hawkins
and
it
forever
changed
the
way.
I
think
and
using
many
of
those
principles
in
that
book
and
applying
them
into
my
development
projects.
H
H
Many
years
and
they're,
obviously
very
passionate
and
talented
Google
has
obviously
the
right
culture
and
this
mindset
of
innovation.
Well,
what
I
didn't
really
know
much
about
was
San
Jose
and
so
I
moved
downtown
and
spent
three
months
there
trying
to
understand
what
was
going
on
and
what
I
saw
was
really
special.
I
could
see
place
happening.
I
could
see
how
hard
the
city
was
working
to
activate
their
spaces.
I
could
see
young
people
downtown
and
I
could
see
these
new
shops
and
retail
starting
to
happen.
H
There
we
go,
and
so
you're
gonna
hear
me
talk
a
lot
about
place
in
place,
just
isn't
about
buildings,
so
it's
not
just
about
creating
office
buildings
or
residential
buildings
or
community
facilities.
It's
about
those
urban
experiences
that
people
crave.
It's
about
the
programming
of
those
experiences
in
the
creation
of
community,
so
you
create
these
places
of
community.
H
So
we
started
to
think
about
how
do
we
create
these
principles
a
place
to
help
guide
us
together
with
the
community
in
creating
places
that
only
enable
the
local
community
and
Google
to
thrive
together?
So
when
focusing
on
place,
there's
four
key
focus
areas:
community
nature,
innovation
and
economics.
So
from
a
community
perspective,
places
are
about
people
and
the
connections
between
them
nature.
The
well-being
of
people
depends
on
the
health
of
the
planet,
innovation.
You
have
to
have
a
healthy
disregard
for
the
impossible
and
economics.
H
We
need
to
invest
in
bold
ideas
that
create
replicable
future
of
solutions
for
the
future
and
what
I
mean
economics
I
don't
mean
just
the
project
being
economically
viable
and
replicable
economic
solutions.
I
mean
about
also
focusing
on
the
economic
well
being
of
a
community,
and
it's
important
that
that
a
successful
place
maker
requires
balancing
all
these
four
areas
in
an
integrated
fashion.
So
when
you
approach
a
place,
you
approach
making
sure
that
it
is
a
balance
between
community
nature,
innovation
and
economics.
H
So
we
need
to
work
together
through
the
community
engagement
process
to
really
understand
what
are
the
right
solutions
for
the
community.
So,
let's
start
with
community,
so
the
top
three
slides
in
the
bottom,
two
left
they're
from
a
windmill
project
and
the
bottom
right
is
from
a
land
lease
project.
So
there's
four
key
things
in
here
that
I
want
to
talk
about.
The
first
thing
is
mixed-use
is
very
important
to
create
vibrancy,
you
know
so
to
having
a
mixture
of
office,
residential
retail
and
community
facilities.
H
The
second
thing
is
the
ground.
Plane
is
super
important.
Now
many
people
don't
necessarily
like
height
and
I.
Don't
blame
them,
because
sometimes
you
look
at
these
architectural
wonders
that
architects
have
come
up
with,
but
they've
forgotten
about
the
ground,
plane,
they've
forgotten
about
the
people
and
that's
where
life
happens
so
place
happens
at
the
ground
plane.
So
it's
really
important
to
make
that
first
40
feet
count.
The
third
thing
is:
through
the
community
engagement,
a
process,
it's
really
important
to
listen
to
the
community
to
really
understand
the
experiences
that
they
want.
H
So
to
give
you
an
example
in
this
particular
project,
the
local
community
wanted
us
to
focus
on
local
retailers.
You
know
so
that
when
they
went
and
got
their
loaf
of,
they
knew
the
Baker.
So
we
found
this
really
great
Baker
and
we
wanted
to
move
on
his
side.
He
made
great
organic
breads,
tasted
fantastic,
but
he
we
couldn't
get
him
into
our
building
soon
enough
because
they
weren't
built.
H
So
we
built
him
a
temporary
facility
on
site
because
we
really
wanted
this
Baker
and
then
he
moved
into
his
new
space
and
he
used
reclaimed
bricks
and
reclaimed
wood
to
create
as
facility
supporting
the
environmental
aspects.
The
fourth
thing
is:
what
I
call
this
activating
place
early.
One
of
the
issues
with
these
large-scale
projects
is,
it
takes
time
to
entitle
and
it
takes
time
to
build
so
it's
important
to
activate
the
community
earlier.
H
So
in
this
project,
elephant
Park,
the
team
went
out
and
bought
a
bunch
of
old
shipping
containers,
repurposed
them
and
put
38
local
creative
groups
and
nonprofits
in
those
in
in
the
containers.
It
was
called
an
arts
work
project
and
they
used
that
place
to
start
activating
community
early
through
a
series
of
events.
Now,
when
you
look
at
those
principles
of
place,
that's
about
community,
but
there
were
some
other
things
that
went
into
that
thing
from
an
innovation,
the
affordable
housing
that
was
put
in
this
project,
because
affordable
housing
is
key
to
a
mixed
use.
H
Neighborhood,
we
came
up
with
an
innovative
solution
with
the
city
to
allow
for
home
ownership
for
affordable
housing
units.
Now,
from
an
economic
perspective
that
artworks
project
employed,
150
people
right
off
the
bat,
but
it
became
this
incubator
center
for
businesses
to
grow
that
would
move
into
the
retail
on
site
and
then,
from
a
nature
perspective.
You'll
see
that
the
project
expressed
nature
in
the
design.
H
So
nature
now
there's
two
components
to
nature.
Its
nature
is
about
connecting
people
to
nature
and
promoting
urban
biodiversity,
but
there's
another
component
is
respecting
nature
and
using
its
resources
wisely,
so
using
less
energy
using
less
water
using
the
materials
wisely
and
things
like
making
sure
you're
addressing
climate
change
resilience.
So
the
top
project
again
is
a
windmill
project
that
had
a
series
of
green
rows
that
attracted
butterflies
and
vegetable
roots,
the
lower
Billings,
our
lend-lease
projects,
and
they
used
the
same
very
much
principles
as
at
Windmill.
H
Is
you
first
of
all
you
focus
on
ensuring
you
achieve
the
highest
rate
of
building,
so
you
use
less
energy
and
water.
You
employ
renewable
energies
on
strategies,
but
these
projects
also
went
deeper
so,
for
instance,
in
the
brian
guru
project,
which
is
about
the
size
of
opportunity
say
of
dirt
on
station,
there's
a
big
central,
harbor
heat
rejection
plant.
What
that
means
is
they
use
the
ocean
for
heating
and
cooling
the
buildings
which
save
millions
of
liters
of
water,
because
there
was
no
cooling
towers,
then,
with
the
project
it
is
it
measured.
H
Then
the
project
also
wanted
to
be
water
positive,
so
it
put
in
a
large
sewage
treatment
plant
in
the
development
that
produce
recycled
water
for
flushing,
toilets
and
irrigation,
and
then
it
was
designed
to
use
baurel
sewage
from
the
city's
sewage
line
to
produce
more
treated
water.
So
then
it
could
export
treated
water
off-site
and
and
therefore
produce
more
water
than
what
it
was
using
on-site
and
likewise
in
Elephant,
&
Castle,
its
central
plant
under
construction
now
to
produce
heat
and
electricity
and
also
able
to
export
off-site
to
get
to
carbon
neutrality.
H
Now,
from
an
innovation
perspective,
when
you
look
at
those
principles,
those
weren't
easy
things
to
do,
the
regulations
had
to
be
changed.
You
had
to
work
with
utility
regulators
to
allow
that
to
be
owned
by
the
project
and
the
developer
from
a
community
perspective
that
vegetable
group
that
created
community
I
mean
it
was
fun
to
watch
the
kids,
take
their
buckets
to
the
roof
and
harvest
their
carrots
and
from
a
no
that's.
My
only.
H
And
then,
from
an
innovation
perspective,
you
know
one
of
the
things
with
innovations.
You
really
need
to
look
at
challenging
their
traditional
approaches
to
development
that
don't
think
about
place
first
now,
let
me
give
me
an
example
when
it
rains
and
hits
our
buildings.
You
know
we
put
the
water
in
pipes
and
we
try
to
get
it
off
site
somewhere
and
store
it
and
then
get
treated,
and
it
goes
in
another
pipe
and,
quite
frankly,
I.
H
Don't
know
where
it
often
goes,
but
it's
it's
in
a
very
expensive
thing
to
do
and
it
adds
no
value
at
all
the
place.
So
I
came
up
with
this
idea
on
this
one
project
to
create
our
own
Creek.
So
this
is
a
man-made
Creek
and
so
what
it
rains
the
building's
the
water
hits
the
building's
flows
directly
into
this
Creek
and
these
ponds
in
the
water
rises
and
falls
and
stores
that
and
the
plants
treat
the
water
on
the
right
side
of
the
creek.
H
Were
these
residential
units
where
the
decks
floated
over
the
ponds
and
on
the
left
side
of
the
creek
was
a
public
pathway
where
the
public
could
move
through
the
site
now
again
using
those
other
principles
from
an
economic
perspective,
those
ground
floor
units
sold
for
a
really
good
price
that
helped
pay
for
the
ponds.
But
the
other
thing
that
happened
is
because
we
didn't
use
municipal
storm
systems.
The
municipality
didn't
charge
us
for
the
storm
water
hookup
fee.
So
again
that
saved
this
money
to
allow
us
invest
into
more
place
and
from
a
community
perspective.
H
One
thing
I
strongly
believe
in
is
that
our
kids
are
losing
their
connection
connections
in
nature
because
we're
urbanizing
and
what
was
fun
in
this
project.
You
could
see
there
was
children
dip
their
nets
in
and
try
to
catch
the
native
fish
that
we
put
in
this
Creek
and
then,
from
a
native
nature
perspective.
A
lot
of
magic
happened
on
this
site.
H
H
Economics,
so
I
want
to
reinforce
this
point
because
economics.
Obviously
the
projects
have
to
be
economically
viable.
You
need
to
create
replicable
economic
solution,
but
again
it's
about
the
economic
well-being
of
the
community.
Now,
please
bear
with
me
in
this
example,
because
it's
not
obvious
of
how
this
create
an
economic
benefit
as
I
walked
through
this.
So
one
of
the
things
I'm,
a
very
big
believer-
is
engaging
the
community.
They
know
place
better
than
any
developer
can
and
they
make
place
stronger
when
you
really
listen
to
them.
H
So
we
engaged
with
what
the
indigenous
people
of
Canada,
which
we
call
First
Nations
people
in
case
I
referred
to
that
and
one
of
the
things
in
our
engagement
process.
They
asked
us
to
do
four
things:
respect
nature,
respect
their
culture
express
their
culture
and
because
they
were
an
economically
disadvantaged
group,
they
asked
us
to
find
jobs
and
create
jobs
in
the
construction
industry
for
them.
H
H
Obviously,
from
a
nature,
we
incorporate
incorporated
many
of
the
ideas
of
the
First
Nation
people
as
well.
Now,
from
an
economic
perspective,
we
were
building
at
a
time.
It's
you've
probably
seen
some
of
these
earlier.
It's
very
innovative
products,
my
projects
that
hadn't
been
before
and
we
were
building
in
a
time
when
construction
costs
were
rising
very
rapidly.
H
It
was
around
the
time
the
Olympics
were
being
built
and
everybody
was
busy
so
that
it
was
hard
to
get
that
drywaller
to
show
up,
and
it
was
really
hard
to
get
the
electrician
and
the
mechanical
because
they
were
all
busy
and
so
developers
were
really
struggling.
They
were
struggling
to
meet
their
budgets
and
they
couldn't
be
built
on
time.
H
In
fact,
some
of
the
developers
couldn't
build
the
projects
for
what
they
sold
for,
even
though
it
was
a
hot
market,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
really
happened
to
us
is
that
when
we
started
that
indigenous
programs,
it
was
really
with
for
carpentry
and
what
we
quickly
realized
in
that
program
is
we
thought
what
we
were
doing
was
trying
to
help
the
indigenous
people?
What
we
actually
found
out
is
they
made
us
better
as
we
started
to
understand
their
culture?
H
It
changed
the
way
we
think
and
it
started
to
impact
our
contractor
on
sites
and
the
next
thing
that
happened
was
the
electrical
and
the
mechanical
trades
signed
up
to
the
program.
So
even
more
people
got
trained
and
then
this
program
spilled,
spilled
out
into
other
parts
of
British
Columbia
and
other
people
continue
to
get
trained.
We
then
went
into
the
local
schools
and
we
asked
the
schools
in
Earth
Day
to
provide
us
posters
about
what
they
thought
of
the
project
and
what
else
we
could
do.
H
I
wasn't
there
this
day,
but
these
indigenous
kids
presented
that
poster
to
the
public
and
into
our
construction
workers
on-site
and
as
the
story
goes,
they
read
this
poem
about
how
much
they
respected
the
fact
that
we
were
looking
after
their
culture
but
creating
economic
opportunity
for
their
people,
and
it
was
interesting
to
see
these
young
construction
workers
and
tool
belts
with
tears
in
their
eyes.
And
so
yes,
there
would
this
improve
the
economic
well-being
of
the
community
for
these
people,
but
it
did
something
for
us.
H
What
happened
was
we
were
one
of
the
few
projects
that
were
delivered
this
project
on
budget
and
on
time?
And
that's
because
people
showed
up
and
I
fundamentally
believe
the
reason
is
it.
They
saw
the
value
that
was
happening
to
the
community
and
they
just
did
not
want
us
to
fail,
and
so
these
programs
often
have
you
you,
you
you
go
into
these
programs
and
you
often
don't
understand
what
the
economic
benefit
that
is
going
to
happen
now.
Lend-Lease
is
also
a
leader
globally
in
these
training
programs.
They
give
me
an
example.
H
In
Australia,
the
Australian
government
contributed
several
million
dollars
to
a
skills
training
program
at
Barangaroo
that
resulted
in
over
eighty
percent
success
rate
from
an
apprentice,
and
they
too
worked
with
their
economically
disadvantaged
indigenous
culture
to
provide
training
in
Elephant
&
Castle
in
London.
There's
a
program
called
be
on
site
that
lend-lease
developed
several
years
ago
and
that's
really
targeted
to
bringing
in
new
people
into
the
construction
trades.
It's
been
so
successful.
H
So
everyone
every
you
know
everyone
in
this
room's,
like
every
stags
viewpoint,
is
very
important,
as
is
the
community's
viewpoint,
but
police
requires
balance
and
we
need
to
maximize
a
whole
and
what
I
mean
by
that
is.
You
know
we
all
have
singular
issues
which
is
really
great
to
have,
but
if
we
get
too
focused
on
say
nature
and
not
really
focus
on
community
innovation
and
neck
bones,
we
won't
create
a
balanced
outcome.
H
So
it's
really
important
that
we
find
that
right
balance
of
these
principles
in
a
way
that
allows
the
community
and
Google
to
thrive
together
in
the
city
San
Jose
is
facing.
You
know
many
of
the
same
issues.
Cities
are
facing
around
the
world
they're
facing
the
same
kind
of
social,
environmental
and
economic
pressures,
whether
that's,
affordable,
housing,
transportation,
displacement,
lack
of
open
spaces.
You
know
climate
change,
you
know
the
list
goes
on
and
on,
and
you
know
we
has
a
community,
you
know
we
as
Google
and
we
as
individuals
feel
that
pressures.
H
You
know
the
well-being
of
a
community
is
affected.
When
you
know
those
that
work
in
our
shops
build
our
buildings,
you
know
teach
our
kids
protect.
Us
can't
live
in
the
communities
that
they
work
and
I
realize
that
Google
can't
solve
all
those
problems.
But
we
really
fundamentally
believe
that
we
can
be
part
of
the
solution
by
working
with
the
with
the
community,
and
we
also
believe
for
us
to
thrive.
The
community
also
has
to
thrive
together.
H
H
We
started
to
think
about
what
are
those
important
areas
that
we
need
to
focus
on
and
and
within
these
areas.
What
we're
really
looking
for
feedback
from
sag
and
the
broader
community
is:
what
are
the
strategies
that
we
can
kind
to
do
to
start
to
fill
this
out,
so
that
we
can
look
at
a
balanced
approach
to
took
the
creation
of
this
opportunity?
And,
lastly,
I
want
to
just
reinforce
that.
H
I
really
do
believe
that
we're
by
working
together,
the
community
can
thrive
and
I
really
believe
that
that
we
can
create
solutions
here
that
allow
Google
to
create
the
kind
of
workplaces
and
services
that,
if
that
allowed
us
to
create
the
culture
that
allowed
us
to
grow,
and
we
can
really
do
well
from
doing
good.
So
thank
you,
I'd
like
to
now
open
it
up
for
some
feedback
and
some
questions.
F
Joe
mentioned
no
one
knows
the
community
better
in
the
community.
That's
why
we're
here?
Oh
sorry,
I'll
step
forward
here,
so
we
wanted
to
ask
you
all
some
general
questions.
We
have
Joe
and
mark
here
to
help
answer
some
questions
you
see
on
the
board.
We
want
to
get
your
general
responses
to
the
presentation.
We
want
to
hear
what
some
of
your
concepts
and
ideas
might
be.
That
Google
should
be
thinking
about.
You
have
folks
here,
representing
Google
that
are
listening
to
your
ideas.
F
That
last
question
really
is
to
queue
up
what
we're
gonna
be
talking
about
it,
the
next
SOG
meeting,
what
we're
gonna
do
those
what
we
talked
about
three
to
four
to
five
minute
TED
talks,
we're
each
gonna,
get
an
opportunity
to
actually
present
and
give
your
inspirations
in
view
of
what
concepts
you
draw,
inspiration
from
that
you
can
see
in
a
deer
down
area.
So
with
that,
what
are
your
general
responses?
I
know
it's
a
very
general
question,
but
if
you
can
flip
your
name
tags
vertical,
we
can
get
started.
F
J
Yes,
that's
normal
Camacho,
Santa,
Clara,
Valley,
Water,
District
and
I
think
that
the
direction
that
is
being
taken
here
is
one
that's
very
promising
to
myself
being
in
the
water
supply,
flood
protection
and
environmental
stewardship
arena.
I
understand
how
one
has
to
balance
all
those
three
issues
when
you're
trying
to
develop
a
project
for
the
community,
it's
a
very
difficult
balancing
act
to
do,
but
I'm
glad
that
Google
is
taking
that
approach,
and
it's
going
to
take
this
challenge
on
another.
J
H
J
And
I
just
want
to
make
sure
also
that
you
know
it's
stated
here
that
nature
is
going
to
be
respected
and
you
try
to
work
within
your
constraints
within
the
environment
and
not
to
cause
harm,
but
to
cause
likes
a
net
benefit
positive,
which
is
a
good
thing,
but
I
hope
that
also
goes
on
the
human
side
of
things
too.
I
would
hate
to
see
people
displaced
and
move
to
create
issues
elsewhere.
Within
you
know
the
county
or
within
the
city
as
well
great.
F
B
Teresa
Alvarado
whisper.
Thank
you
very
much.
Just
my
reaction
was
that
you
were
very
genuine
and
very
open
in
your
approach
and
I
think
Google.
Their
participation
on
this
committee
really
represents
that
as
well
and
I
appreciate
that
I
think
the
scale
of
the
work
that
you
referenced
is
really
important,
because
we
can't
compare
this
to
anything
else.
We've
ever
built,
it's
not
a
piecemeal
solution.
It's
not
talking
about
infrastructure,
separate
from
cultural
community,
separate
from
economic
development,
separate
from
environmental
stewardship
or
anything
else.
B
You
were
talking
about
a
scale
of
a
district
that
really
requires
someone
who
understands
all
those
intersections.
So
I
really
appreciated
you
talking
about
things
in
that
scale.
I
also
thought
it
was
really
really
important
to
talk
about
this
being
a
people
first
project
and
people
first
approach,
San
Jose
has
so
much
talent
and
we've
had
individuals
who
reflect
incredible
creativity,
incredible
innovation
over
you
know
throughout
history,
in
San
Jose,
but
for
many
many
years
they've
been
isolated
and
on
their
own,
and
so
we
we
don't
see
them
a
lot.
B
In
fact,
many
of
them,
I
think
have
have
given
up
giving
up
hope
on
San,
Jose
I
think,
what's
really
important
is
to
tap
into
that
they
they
do
still
exist
here
and
I
want
them
to
be
lifted
up
through
this
process
and
be
provided
with
an
outlet
to
share
their
creativity
and
our
cultural.
Many
many
cultural
experiences
just
finally,
a
couple
more
things:
urban
design,
extremely
important
I
want
I,
would
love
to
see
something
that
is
unique
to
not
only
San
Jose
but
unique
in
the
world.
B
The
kind
of
closed
systems
you're
talking
about
from
an
environmental
resource
natural
resource
standpoint
is
different
than
what
we
are
accustomed
to
here
and
I.
Think
it's
critical
with
periods
of
drought
and
flood
and
drought
and
flood
and
and
and
climate
change,
of
course,
I
think
it's
really
critical
and
so
environmental
stewardship
as
well.
Thank
you
for
your
presentation.
B
I
Like
Jeffrey
Buchanan
with
working
partnerships,
thank
you
for
the
presentation.
Two
questions
one.
It
was
helpful
to
see
the
different
kind
of
overlays
that
you're
looking
at
in
your
planning
process.
What
do
you
think
for
this
particular
project,
given
the
amount
of
kind
of
public
supports
that
are
surrounding
it?
The
investments
in
the
transit
infrastructure,
the
kinds
of
upzoning
the
project
will
take
some
of
the
other
ways
in
which
the
public
land-
that's
that's
vital.
To
making
this
project
work.
I
Does
that
change
any
of
your
planning
decisions
just
that
the
amount
of
kind
of
public
support?
That's
a
part
of
this
project
and
then,
lastly,
I
appreciated
the
the
look
at
how
these
different
areas
overlap
and
I.
Think
for
me
the
thing
that
that
perhaps
is
most
concerning
is
you
know
the
issue
of
displacement?
Really,
has
you
know
economic,
social
and
environmental
impacts?
I
Each
new
worker
is
on
the
road
for
about
an
additional
forty
minutes
compared
to
existing
workers
in
Mountain
View,
and
so
it's
actually
you're
seeing
the
most
environmental
impact
from
the
job
growth
and
combine
that
with
what
we're
seeing
in
terms
of
displacement
from
workers
who
live
in
Mountain,
View
or
San
Jose
and
are
getting
pushed
out
to
the
Central
Valley
in
some
of
those
workers
even
are
working
at
tech
companies.
You
know
working
as
janitorial
we're
working
as
security
officers
working
in
the
cafeterias.
I
Q
So
I
mean
I,
guess
I'll
start
with
your
second
question.
First,
you
know.
Obviously,
as
Joe
mentioned,
you
know,
the
issues
of
housing
and
transportation
in
particular
are
huge
and,
and
they
spill
over
into
the
concepts
of
displacement.
You
know.
Obviously,
if
you
can't
live
near
where
you
work.
Alright,
that
starts
to
change
the
nature
of
the
community
and
obviously
has
a
big
effect
on
those
individuals.
I
mean
to
start
with
with
this
project.
One
of
the
reasons
we
were
obviously
attracted
to
it
was
the
concept
of
Jared
daun
station
that
you
know
we
see.
Q
What's
going
on,
we
see
the
problems
that
exist
when
workplaces
are
built
away
from
areas
where
people
can
commute
through
public
transportation
or
away
from
areas
where
they
can
live,
and
our
hope
here
and
working
with
you
know
this
group.
The
community
in
the
city,
is
that
we
can
create
a
live
work
environment
in
this
area
across
the
multiple
stratas
of
of
the
economic
groups.
Q
That
will
allow
people
to
live
nearby,
but
just
as
importantly,
by
having
tear
down
station
there
and
when
it's
it's
completed
by
having
art
by
having
Caltrain
by
having
a
high
speed
rail
by
having
all
these
modes
of
transportation
available
that
there
becomes
a
very
you
know,
convenient
way
of
getting
to
the
place
that
allows
people
a
much
better
quality
of
life
in
terms
of
reducing
their
commute.
So
you
know,
there's
no
easy
answer
to
the
things
that
you
pose.
Q
O
Harvey
Darnell
North
Willow,
Bend,
Neighborhood
Association
I
spent
40
years
of
my
life
as
a
nurse,
so
I
tend
to
look
at
things
holistically
and
I
really
appreciated
the
fact
that
what
you
showed
us
that
you've
worked
on
so
far
has
been
holistic
I'm.
Not
only
someone
who
is
in
wants
to
see
people
live,
you
know
in
a
good
way,
but
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
have
proper
stewardship
of
the
earth.
O
F
P
Noelle
Fernandez
was
Silicon,
Valley,
rising
and
say
I.
She,
the
principles
that
were
shared
and
I
would
love
to
hear
more,
like
I
want
to
hear
more
about.
What
do
you
know
you?
We
know
that,
there's
more
limb,
that's
been
purchased
and
things
are
moving
forward
rapidly.
As
we
read
in
the
business
journal
in
the
media.
What
how
can
we
learn
more
about
your
actual
plans
for
this
site
so
that
we
could
have
a
robust
conversation
and
really
add
to
you
know
what
we
to
envision.
Q
You
know,
obviously
you
know
things
are
moving
forward
at
this
stage,
but
you
know
this
is
gonna.
Take
a
while
and
I
think
there's
a
perception
that
that
there's
this
grand
master
plan
that
we've
already
worked
out
or
thought
through
and
somehow
we're
not
you
know,
sharing
it
with
the
community
at
large
and
and
frankly,
this
is
the
beginning
of
the
process.
You
know,
for
us
to
get
the
site
together,
just
by
itself
is
obviously
very
complicated.
Q
It's
not
completed
yet
by
the
way
you
know
that's
taken
quite
a
while,
and
you
know
part
of
you
know,
the
process
of
engagement
really
had
to
wait
until
there
was
a
site
honestly
to
discuss,
but
now
that
we're
getting
close
right
to
having
a
site-
that's
viable.
You
know
it
was
time
really
just
to
start
this
engagement
process
to
really
get
into
the
detail.
You
know
we
really
want
to
hear
the
feedback
from
the
community
before
we
design
a
plan.
Q
It
doesn't
mean
we
can't
think
of
conceptual
ideas,
and
we've
done
a
little
bit
of
that
already,
where
we've
had
some
some
very
high
level
conceptual
designs,
which
we've
run
by
folks
justice,
get
reactions
and
start
getting
some
feedback,
but
there's
nothing.
That's
been
done
yet
in
any
detail,
because,
frankly,
we
need
to
hear
from
the
community
first
it'd
be
presumptive
to
start
that
process
until
we
know
what
the
communities
can
be
interested
in
great.
K
N
Good
evening,
I'm
bill
sellers
I
represent
part
of
the
San
Jose
downtown
residents
association.
So,
first
of
all,
I
enjoyed
the
presentation.
Thank
you,
and
one
of
the
things
I
liked
was
your
notion
about
early
activation
and
if
we
look
at
five
years
or
seven
years
from
now,
very
early
activation
could
be
something
that
I
think.
All
of
us
need
to
be
thinking
about
I'm,
going
to
jump
to
the
third
question,
which
areas
should
we
learn
more
from
with
you?
N
That
way,
but
the
very
unfortunate
events
in
the
last
couple
of
weeks
changed
the
you
know:
change
the
calculus
a
little
bit.
So
one
of
the
things
that
I'm
hoping
for
is
that
we
don't
have
you
know
a
citadel
sitting
in
the
middle
of
our
neighborhood.
I
came
out
of
high
tech,
I
badging,
the
buildings,
I
badging,
the
floors,
I
batted
badge
in
two
rooms,
so
I
get
the
security
thing,
but
I
think
that's
going
to
be
a
very,
very
important
design
decision.
F
J
Hamilton
Guadalupe
River
Park
Conservancy.
How
I
might
thank
yous
I'm
curious
about
what
was
it
about
living
in
downtown
for
three
months
that
excited
you
and
what
specifically
about
this
area
also
interested?
They
know
about
affordable
housing
and
glad
they
know
that.
That's
you
consider
that
successful
for
any
mixed-use
development.
Can
you
talk
about
phasing
I
mean
you
again.
You've
assembled
an
amazing
amount
of
property,
but
can
you
talk
about
how
you
see
the
project
coming
online.
H
H
That
hasn't
been
thought
through
enough
and
and
I
looked
at
the
fabric
of
the
city
and
I
realize
with
the
station
and
and
us
bringing
in
these
new
jobs.
It's
just
going
to
create
this
opportunity
to
really
fuel
that
momentum.
That's
going
and
almost
be
like
a
catalyst
and
I
just
really
can
see
it
before
my
eyes.
I
mean
I've
been
involved
in
enough
cities
around
the
world
that
you
know
that
the
backbone
there
and
the
other
thing
is
the
people.
H
Q
So,
with
regards
to
the
phasing
you
know,
this
is
a
marathon.
This
is
a
major
major
project.
You
know
the
scale
that
we're
talking
about.
You
know
across
the
full
240
acres.
Obviously
that's
not
going
to
just
be
Google,
not
even
a
small
percentage
of
it
will
be,
but
it's
gonna
take
quite
a
while
right
for
that
to
build
down
and-
and
a
lot
of
this
is
also
going
to
revolve
around
the
station
itself
and
the
time
of
the
transportation
improvements
it's
going
to
take
time.
Q
To
finish,
you
know,
Bart
is
going
to
take
time
for
a
high-speed
rail.
It's
going
to
take
time
for
that
station
to
really
achieve
its
full
fruition
and
that's
going
to
be
important
piece
to
the
puzzle
in
terms
of
being
able
to
handle
the
density
in
the
capacity
that's
necessary
for
the
full
implementation
of
the
vision.
So
you
know
we're
anticipating
it
will
be
done.
You
know
in
phases
over
time.
We
really
don't
have
any
details,
yet
it's
hard
for
us
to
say
how
much
and
in
what
time
period.
C
Sara
McDermott
representing
South
Bay,
labor
Council
I'm
gonna
echo
some
comments
that
have
already
been
made,
but
thank
you
for
the
presentation
and
as
I
was
looking
at
kind
of
the
buckets
you
have
here.
Community
nature
economics
during
those
three
housing
crisis
was
running
through
my
mind
as
I'm
sure
you
can
imagine
and
I
do
think.
The
transportation
rich
area
is
certainly
helpful
with
that.
But
we
have
an
issue
that
there's
people
within
walking
distance
of
the
project
who
are
likely
to
be
displaced.
C
Those
might
be
people
who
are
likely
to
be
service
workers
who
are
going
to
be
pushed
out
to
places
that
aren't
going
to
benefit
from
that
public
transportation
such
as
Hollister
Tracy
maanteeeca.
We
have
members
that
commute
from
there
all
the
time,
so
I'm
curious
how
you're
thinking
about
that
in
your
thinking
of
placemaking
and
housing.
Q
Socio
means
you
point
out,
you
know,
housing
is
going
to
be
a
very
important
part
of
this.
Development
has
to
be
it's
an
important
part
of
community.
It's
hard
to
think
of
a
successful
community
that
didn't
have
housing
as
integral
part
of
it,
and,
and
we
do
talk
about
housing
has
to
be
housing
for
all
portions
of
the
economy
right
and
so
we
know
that's
a
need.
Q
Q
I
mean
you
know,
there's
a
certain
amount
of
housing
that
just
simply
is
gonna
have
to
get
built,
and
you
know
there
I
think
a
lot
of
different
ways
that
that
could
be
achieved
and
we're
really
going
to
be
interested
hearing
from
these
folks,
both
in
this
room
and
elsewhere
about
other
ideas
as
to
how
it
might
happen.
But
you
know,
regardless
of
the
volume
again
focus
on
on
how
all
aspects
of
society
is
going
to
be
dealt
with.
It's
going
to
be
important:
it's
got
to
be
able
to
work
at
a
market
level.
Q
It's
also
got
to
work
at
an
affordable
level.
It's
got
to
work
for
all
different
types
of
workers.
If
the
communities
can
be
able
to
thrive,
so
I
mean
I,
think
you're
bringing
up
an
extremely
important
and
valid
point.
It's
one
that
we
know
we're.
Gonna
have
to
work
with
everyone
to
figure
out
great.
F
Thank
you.
That's
a
great
segue
to
what
we're
gonna
be
talking
about
later,
as
well
with
the
solution
groups
and
what
kind
of
solutions
could
come
out
of
those
discussions,
including
models
and
tools
that
we
should
be
thinking
about
and
kind
of
setting
the
next
stage
and
the
ideas
you
all
bring
to
the
table.
So
with
that
Nadia
I
think
you
were
next
I.
M
Was
actually
gonna
say
almost
exactly
what
Sarah
was
gonna
say
is
that
I
felt
like
well
of
the
buckets
that
you
mentioned?
Housing
was
missing
and
housing
really
needs
to
be
one
of
the
buckets
when
it
comes
to
San
Jose.
You
know
you,
you
mentioned
creating
a
community
and
that
run
me
a
little
bit
the
wrong
way.
I
know
that
wasn't
your
intention,
because
there's
already
community
that
exists,
we
don't
need
to
create
one
so
I.
Think
as
we
talk
about
this
development,
it's
helped
not
only.
M
E
E
Option
and
also
the
at
grade
and
the
upgrade
option
actually
just
about
devastates
our
neighborhood
by
the
number
of
tracks,
the
number
of
single-family
homes
that
it
will
take,
and
so
one
of
the
big
things
I'm
here
is
to
try
to
preserve
the
existing
culture
of
our
neighborhood,
which
is
largely
Latino,
and
the
other
thing
is
I
like
what
Harvey
had
to
say
about
daylighting
the
Los
Gatos
Creek.
This
is
a
tremendous
opportunity
to
get
that
back
opened.
E
If
we
don't
do
it
now,
it
will
never
happen,
and
so
just
in
conclusion,
how
you
integrate
your
project
with
all
the
other
things
that
are
going
on
there's
some
of
it.
You
don't
have
control
over,
but
you
can
heavily
influence
for
the
greater
good
and
I'd
like
to
you
know,
I
think
that's
what
this
whole
group
is
here
to
work
with
you
on
to
to
do
our
best
for
that.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you.
J
Thank
you
Laura
winter,
st.
Leo's,
a
neighborhood
representative.
First
of
all,
thank
you
for
a
inspiring
and
exciting
presentation.
Your
expertise
and
passion
certainly
came
through
and
I
like
that.
A
lot
one
of
the
things
we
need
to
think
about
is,
as
I'm
sure,
you've
realized.
San
Jose
has
some
of
the
best
climate
in
the
country.
J
If
not
the
planet
and
downtown
San
Jose
has
a
lot
of
people
wandering
all
the
time,
but
we
don't
do
a
very
good
job
of
creating
spaces
where
people
congregate
on
a
regular
basis
and
I
think
we
have
an
opportunity
here,
especially
with
the
two
waterways
Los
Gatos
creaking
waddle
loop,
a
river,
to
really
create
something
that
San
Jose
downtown
San
Jose
has
been
missing
for
a
very
long
time.
You
know
you
see
people
walking
through
what
do
we
need
to
do
to
get
people
to
stay
and
make
additional
connections
Thanks.
F
H
R
R
F
R
The
the
activating
destination
early-
you
know
that
does
just
so
pleased
that
Joe
and
I'm
sure
Mark
have
walked
the
sites.
I've
walked
downtown
and
just
thought
about
what
a
cool
cool
place
that
we
could
could
could
create
at
the
same
time
preserving
the
culture,
as
you
mentioned,
some
other
projects,
but
also
community
that
we
have
in
this
town,
town
area,
so
I'm
just
so
pleased
that
you're,
just
as
equally
as
excited
as
I
am
and
in
others,
in
the
room.
Q
M
You
and
thank
you
for
your
presentation,
so
I'm,
both
a
downtown
resident
and
I
work,
downtown
I
do
a
lot
of
walking
around
downtown
and
I
really
am
looking
forward
to
this
project.
Moving
forward,
one
of
the
things
that
that
I've,
seen
sort
of
like
Kathy's
talked
about
the
various
properties
that
are
being
slowly
assembled
is
that
there
are
other
projects
too,
and
this
may
end
up
being
more
of
a
city
question
than
then
a
googol
question
is
how
does
this
project
integrate
with
some
of
these
other
projects
that
are
happening
at
the
same
time?
M
And
in
that
respect
you
know
I'm,
with
Silicon
Valley
at
home.
What
did
I
introduce
myself
so
I'm
sorry,
Leslie,
Chris
Elia,
with
Silicon
Valley
at
home,
so
we're
very
interested
in
the
housing
piece
and
and
as
we
add
not
just
your
project,
but
all
of
these
others.
How
do
we
think,
through
through
housing
and
affordable
housing,
in
a
way
that
makes
sure
that
that
we
were
just
doing
the
right
planning
so
anyway?
Thank
you
very
much.
F
K
My
name
is
meadow
Joe
of
the
Silicon
Valley
by
coalition
kind
of
follows
the
previous
two
comments
about
integration
and
given
the
BRIT,
the
disparate
nature
of
kind
of
this
project.
What
design
principles
are
thinking
about
for
facilitating
connectivity
between
these
different
nodes
and
if
there
are
specific
corridors,
you're
looking
at
and
kind
of
how
that
might
impact
I'm
surrounding
communities.
Things.
H
Q
F
Looking
at
multiple
modes
of
transportation
is
definitely
something
we
heard
consistently
from
you
all.
We'll
definitely
looking
at
is
one
of
the
solution
groups
as
well.
So
we
have
time
for
a
couple
more
questions,
I'm
going
to
let
folks
that
haven't
had
a
chance
to
speak
and
then
I'll
come
back
to
you
Harvey
and
Norma.
Yes,
saundra
I,.
L
J
The
M
we're
coming
from
Singapore,
so
our
background
is
over
there
and
we
see
men
in
suits
on
nine
BOTS
going
to
work
so
and
I
see
scooters
in
the
last
two
weeks.
Just
you
know
all
over
the
place
here,
and
that
seems
like
a
really
recent
trend.
So
just
in
forecasting,
when
you
look
forward,
things
can
change
rapidly.
So
not.
J
I
just
had
a
question,
you
indicated
there's
not
a
master
plan,
but
is
there
some
type
of
plan
for
the
type
of
facility
that
you're
trying
to
develop
here?
Is
there
going
to
be
like
an
RD
facility
with
Google
here,
or
is
it
going
to
be
more
of
like
computer
workstations
customer
support?
What
is
the
idea
that
Google
has
in
terms
of
the
types
of
jobs
that
they'll
be
bringing
here.
Q
Q
So
you
know,
the
only
thing
I
would
say
is
that
you
know
most
likely
we're
looking
at
a
large
group
that
would
come
and
move
into
the
San
Jose
area
and
its
totality
as
opposed
to
little
bits
and
pieces
of
different
groups
most
likely
we
would
keep
a
team
together,
but
which
team
it
would
be.
You
know
very,
very
hard
to
say
at
this
stage,
but
you
know
in
general,
you
know
the
Google
office
environment
tends
to
be
around.
H
F
O
Q
Mean
we've
heard
the
25,000
number,
or
so
that's
not
really
our
number
right
in
the
sense
that
I
mean
I
think
in
terms
of
orders
of
magnitude,
it's
it's
in,
we
arrange,
but
we
really
don't
know
yet.
You
know
exactly
what
kind
of
numbers
we're
talking
about:
I
mean
whatever
it
is,
there's
gonna
be
a
core
that
would
be
Google
itself
and
then
there's
always
other
jobs
that
you
know
we.
We
call
temps,
vendors
and
contractors
that
are
associated
with
Google.
That
would
also
be
panel
development.
Q
O
Q
Jobs,
I
think
that
it
will
definitely
be
part
of
this
process
is
to
we'll
just
sort
of
project
out.
You
know
what
kind
of
ratios
we're
talking
about
and
again,
but
we
don't
know,
still
is
even
the
exact
nature
of
the
groups
that
would
come
out
here
and,
and
there
are
differences
right
between
those
groups
and
then
how
those
things
would
be
balanced.
But
we
can
look
at
the
range
of
options
that
might
exist.
F
The
next
segment
of
the
agenda
we're
going
to
talk
about
existing
conditions.
Thank
you
very
much
Joe
and
mark.
Oh
I'm.
Sorry
I
just
want
to
remind
you
all
that
that
the
concepts
ideas
places
that
you
draw
inspiration
from
I
want
you
to
really
think
about
that
and
bring
that
forth.
We're
gonna
have
representatives
of
Google
at
every
meeting.
They're
gonna
be
here
to
listen
and
absorb
that
information.
It's
gonna
be
posted
online.
We
really
want
you
to
think
about
that
before
the
next
meeting.
F
F
Okay,
existing
conditions,
information.
We
sent
you
all
a
host
of
data
to
start
to
absorb
some
of
the
existing
conditions.
We're
not
gonna
go
through
everything
in
great
detail
here
tonight.
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
a
very
big
overall
kind
of
framework
of
what
we
have
to
date,
recognizing
that
there's
a
lot
of
data.
That's
still
out
there
that
we
need
to
gather,
but
we
we
started
to
pull
some
information
based
on
what
we
know:
basic
statistics
of
the
dude
on
station
area.
F
As
you
can
see
here,
approximately
a
population
of
2150
about
740
households,
800
Wehling
units
about
1800,
employment
and
jobs.
Excuse
me:
we
also
started
looking
at
different
areas
around
the
station
area,
trying
to
gather
information
both
within
a
one-mile
buffer
and
a
quarter
mile
buffer,
recognizing
that
quarter
mile
is
that
kind
of
walkable
distance
of
people
that
can
actually
access
the
site
easily,
as
you
can
maybe
see
here
with
there's.
A
lot
of
information
that
you
asked
for
this
stuff
highlighted
here
is
what
we
were
able
to
gather
to
date.
F
A
lot
of
information
about
land
use
and
pipeline
projects,
housing
both
renter
owner
occupied,
some
of
the
deed,
restricted,
affordable
housing
is
in
there
as
well.
Demographics
excuse
me,
health
education,
a
bit
on
economy,
but
again
we're
gonna,
keep
this
ongoing
list
going.
We
want
you
to
tell
us
what
we
don't
have
on
this
list
and
what
other
information
you
want
like
Harvey
just
mentioned
a
second
ago.
There
is
an
interactive
map
on
the
city's
website
that
allows
you
to
go
in
and
actually
access
the
existing
land
use
and
zoning.
F
If
you
all
haven't
been
there,
it's
fascinating.
You
should
definitely
check
it
out
very
fun
to
cruise
do
that
as
a
planner,
I
love.
It
there's
also
a
lot
of
detail
about
the
permitting
process.
Again,
all
this
great
information
is
in
the
resource
tabs
connected
to
this
project,
we're
also
developing
a
project
website.
That's
going
to
be
dedicated
to
this.
It's
gonna
be
a
little
more
user
friendly,
we're
hoping
that
will
come
online
in
the
next
couple
weeks
as
well.
So
we'll
keep
you
posted
there.
F
This
list,
which
I'm
sure
you
can
read
in
great
detail,
just
talks
a
little
bit
more
about
the
pipeline
projects,
just
showing
that
there
is
a
lot
out
there
currently,
including
a
lot
of
housing.
That's
currently
in
the
pipeline,
that's
going
through
the
process
of
review
and
through
the
planning.
I'm,
not
gonna,
go
through
all
of
them
here,
but
again
just
want
to
give
you
a
sense
of
what's
out
there
now.
This
list
is
constantly
getting
updated,
depending
on
what's
coming
in
through
the
pipeline.
We
could
talk
about
that
in
a
bit
as
well.
F
If
there's
any
questions
again,
we
try
to
look
at
both
a
mile
buffer
and
a
quarter
mile
buffer,
just
to
get
a
sense
of
not
only
the
station
area
but
its
environs
and
what's
going
on
around
it,
as
you
can
see
here,
renters
both
within
a
quarter
mile
and
a
mile
around
65
to
70
percent
of
all
housing,
and
this
will
all
be
available
as
well
again
on
the
project
website.
What
we'll
post
this
on
the
website,
so
everyone
from
the
public
as
well
can
have
this
information.
F
We
looked
at
percentage
of
renter's
versus
occupied
again
I'm,
not
gonna,
go
through
all
this
in
great
detail,
but
just
that
generally
kind
of
information
we
have
available
again.
This
is
owner-occupied
housing
in
the
area.
Kind
of
shows
that
the
dark
red,
where
the
pockets
of
most
owner-occupied
housing
is.
We
also
looked
at
single-family
homes
in
the
area,
the
darker
it
gets
again
higher
concentration
of
single-family
homes
in
and
around
the
area
number
of
occupied
homes
as
well
deed,
restricted,
affordable,
housing,
again
fantastic
link
on
a
city's
website.
F
We
looked
at
demographics.
This
was
interesting
as
well
as
you
can
see
age.
Demographics,
there's
a
pretty
good
contingent
of
25
to
40
made
up
about
half
of
the
pop
relation
within
a
quarter-mile
and
only
about
10%
were
between
5
and
17.
Currently
again,
within
that
quarter-mile
stretch,
we
thought
that
was
interesting
but
again
curious
to
hear
what
you
all
think
about
it.
F
As
we
move
forward
here,
demographics,
we
looked
at
race
as
well
large
population
of
white
within
a
quarter
mile
about
40%
of
the
total
makeup,
but
also
about
32
percent
or
32,
and
a
half
percent
of
Hispanic
and
about
50
percent
of
Hispanic
within
a
mile.
We
thought
that
was
interesting.
We
looked
at
education
to
statistics,
health
economy,
again,
I,
don't
want
to
go
through
all
this
right
here,
but
just
to
give
you
a
sense
of
the
information
that's
available,
mainly
through
census
and
other
resources
percentage,
not
high
school
graduates,
graduates,
some
without
health
insurance.
F
Obviously,
again
you
can
see
large
concentrations
in
the
dark
red
health
disadvantage
index.
This
is
from
the
public
health
alliance
of
Southern
California.
Just
talking
about
what
some
of
those
I'm
not
only
economic
but
I,
believe
some
environmental
factors
that
might
influence
people's
quality
of
life
in
the
area
median
income.
F
We
have
people
below
the
poverty
line.
Excuse
me,
poverty
line.
You
can
see
again
higher
concentrations.
It
looks
like
just
north
a
northern
area
of
the
station
area.
We
looked
at
parks
and
open
space
again
we
want
to.
We
know
that
parks
and
open
space
we
keep
here
and
how
important
that
is
to
you
all.
We
want
to
identify
where
those
are
currently
how
we
create
connections
to
those
parks
and
open
space
and
again
remind
you,
while
as
inspiration,
we're
not
necessarily
looking
for
stuff
outside
of
the
city.
F
There's
a
great
inspiration
right
here
within
the
city
that
we
can
draw
from,
and
we
want
you
all
to
bring
that
to
the
table.
Let
us
know
what
area
should
be
looked
at
more
closely
and
what
this
project
should
consider
environmental
factors
we
looked
at
from
the
EPA.
This
is
their
different,
significant
environmental
impacts
that
they
have
identified
as
part
of
their
processes,
and
we
could
talk
about
that
a
little
bit
more
if
we
need
to
as
well
and
actually
that's
it.
So
we
flew
through
that
I
know
it's
a
lot
of
information.
F
I
know
it's
a
lot
more
that
you
need
to
still
absorb.
Is
there
other
information
other
than
what
you
saw
on
that
initial
list,
which
maybe
I'll
go
back
to
real
quickly?
Just
so,
you
can
see
what
we
have
and
what
else
we
can
gather
here
and
I
apologize.
You
try
to
pack
it
all
in
here.
Is
there
anything
that
you
see
on
this
list?
This
is
again
the
list
that
you
all
gave
us
that
we
have
heard
over
the
last
few
meetings.
F
P
P
P
Our
concern
is
absolutely
that
area,
but
it's
also
bigger
than
that,
particularly
thinking
about
the
east
side
in
other
pockets
of
poverty
across
the
city
and
even
the
region.
So
I
wonder
when
we're
looking
at
the
demographics,
if
we
could
actually
get
the
demographics
that
are
from
a
larger
radius
and
if
we
can
get
those
data
points
that
have
been
created
by
UC
berkeley
around
where
we
suspect
there
might
be
gentrification
and
displacement
where
we're
already
seeing
it.
That's.
A
So
we're
gonna
talk
about
solution
groups
in
a
minute
and
kind
of
the
you
know.
The
meeting
structure
part
of
that
first
meeting
will
be
kind
of
an
initial
shot
of
you
know
some
of
this,
but
then
what
else
is
needed
so
I
think?
Well,
you
know
this
will
be
a
pretty
iterative
process
between
staff
and
the
SAG
on
this
data.
Coming
back
to
you,
thanks
Leslie.
F
J
Hamilton
Guadalupe
River
Park
Conservancy.
Before
my
current
position,
I
worked
for
the
Mineta
Transportation
Institute
of
San
Jose
State,
and
they
did
a
lot
of
Trent
funded
a
lot
of
pedestrian
studies.
I,
don't
think
the
quarter-mile
mark
is
very
useful.
It's
a
five
minute,
walk
I,
think
that
in
the
studies
that
I
recall
a
ten
minute,
half
mile
was
much
more
much
more
useful.
I'm
also
like
to
ask
for
finer
granularity
on
some
of
your
maps.
F
Yeah
I
appreciate
that
yeah
right
now
the
information
is
available
at
a
block
group
levels.
So
it's
very
it's
not
very
granular,
but
we
can
get
down
that
level
based
on
some
of
the
information
we
have
and
and
I
want
to
remind
you
that
you
all
are
a
great
resource
here
as
well.
I
mean
you're
all
experts,
you're
all
community
members
and
have
access
to
a
lot
of
information
that
we
or
the
city
might
not
have
access
to.
So
please
bring
that
information
to
us
as
well.
F
I
The
point
that
Harvey
made
earlier
I
think
it
would
be
great
to
have
a
look
at
some
of
the
information
about
the
jobs
within
Google
I.
Think
in
the
last
meeting
there
was
a
point
raised
around
inclusion
in
some
of
the
studies
that
Google's
done
about
the
the
racial
and
gender
makeup
of
their
workforce
and
various
roles
of
their
workforce.
Another
great
resource
that
we
can
provide
a
colleague
of
ours,
Chris
Benner,
had
to
crunch
some
numbers.
Looking
at
the
subcontracted
service
workers
and
different
lines
of
work,
that's
subcontracted
by
the
tech
industry
and
yeah.
I
It's
Harvey's
earlier
point
they're
paid
about
one-fifth
of
the
directly
employed
workforce
and
so
I
think
it's
really
important
for
us
to
have
that
kind
of
base
of
knowledge,
as
we
think
about
this
project
and
perhaps
what
the
various
points
of
how
it
intersects,
with
what
the
demographics
of
our
city
is
and
what
what
jobs
they
may
have
access
to.
Folks
who
actually
live
here
so
yeah
great.
K
Pact,
it
would
be
interesting,
I
think.
Another
data
point
would
help
us
determine
some
of
the
poverty
levels
on
a
more
granular
level
is
really
looking
at
snap
recipients
related
to
school
enrollment
and
what
percentage
of
the
students
in
the
area
schools
are
receiving
free
lunches,
lunch
assistance
to
me
I
think
that
that,
and
also
the
literacy
level
in
third
grade.
That
would
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
the
level
of
education.
F
M
Any
of
that
tap
risk
it's
in
the
housing
element,
and
that
means
that
any
affordable
housing
that's
at
risk
of
losing
its
deed
restriction
within
the
next
seven
or
so
years,
and
the
other
thing
that
I
was
wondering
about
is,
if
there's
a
way
to
identify
which
community-based
organizations
nonprofits
organizations
that
serve
our
community
are
located
within
a
quarter
mile
mile
or
a
mile
just
so
that
we
know
like
where
those
where
the
service
organizations
are
and
also
what
the
impact
of
this
development
might
have
on
those
organizations.
Great.
F
J
Me
Norma
Camacho,
Santa,
Clara,
Valley,
Water
District
is
to
identify
some
of
the
hazards
that
may
exist
in
the
area.
For
instance,
flood
hazards.
Is
it
a
special
flood
hazard
zone
earthquake
hazards?
Is
it
near
fault?
Have
there
been
previous
contamination
at
the
site?
Are
there
the
existence
of
underground
storage
tanks
existing
plumes
that
lying
undisturbed
at
this
point
in
time
it
might
be
good
to
draw
out
at
this
point.
Thank.
K
F
O
K
O
K
F
Know
that's
a
great
question.
I
do
know
that
this
city
has
some
interactive
maps.
We
put
these
together
based
on
some
information
we
have,
we
can
see,
we
can
match
some
data
sources
to
him,
just
Excel
sheets,
so
we
can
get
be
organized
in
that
way.
So
we'll
look
into
that
for
sure
Jeffrey
did
you
have
one
last
comment
or
were
you
all
set?
No
I
know
I'll.
F
Well,
thank
you
again
very
much.
This
was
huge
and
getting
moving
us
forward
as
Lee
mentioned.
This
will
continue
be
an
ongoing
conversation.
This
information
will
live
on
the
city's
website,
we'll
dive
much
deeper
into
this
data
and
information
as
we
move
into
the
solution
groups
and
that's
also
a
great
segue.
If
I
can
get
to
that
slide
to
the
solution.
Groups
I'm
gonna
hand
it
off
to
thee.
A
Thanks,
Dave,
ok,
so
solution
groups,
so
this
is
a
kind
of
a
topic
that
we
introduced
last
time
as
I
stated
earlier
kind
of
our
mandate
and
coming
under
the
umbrella
of
the
Brown
Act.
It
changes
our
approach
a
little
bit.
So
we've
added
a
little
bit
of
structure
that
I
still
think
you
know
we
we
get
to
where
we
wanted
to
be
as
a
group,
so
it
just
as
a
reminder.
There's
38
people
on
the
ssag
for
us
to
do
real,
deep
dives
on
some
of
these
policy
issues
would
take
three
four
years.
A
A
So
that's
what
we're
gonna
do.
They're
gonna
function,
they're
gonna
be
somewhat
self-directed
with
support
from
city
staff
such
as
myself,
Loren
Dave,
and
then
other
staff
is
needed,
depending
on
the
bucket
to
help
you
know
facilitate
if
needed,
but
also
to
bring
back
information,
and
so
you
will
be
identifying
data
or
information
needs
and
requests
to
help,
support
your
process
and
what
we're
gonna
do
is
really
see
if
we
can
get
some
of
these
done
in
two
meetings
and
then
bring
back
some
initial
feedback
to
the
SAC.
A
So
the
first
is
really
discuss
the
topics
and
we
are
gonna
kind
of
walk
away
tonight,
with
a
better
understanding
of
what
these
five
buckets
are
gonna
be.
But
the
first
meeting
is
really
going
to
be
around
kind
of
the
possible
solutions
or
concerns
that
we
have
in
this
specific
area
and
then
we'll
go
back
with
some
direction
from
your
own
staff,
whether
it's
information
or
hey
does
another
city.
Do
something
like
this
best
practices
work
and
bring
it
back
to
you.
A
So
you
can
further
develop
some
of
these
solutions
and
then
the
third
thing
will
be
reporting
back
to
the
SAG
and
we're
going
to
go
over
the
timeline.
So
you
can
see
when
that'll
happen.
They're
gonna,
be
staggered
out
kind
of
meetings,
I
think
four
or
five,
six
and
seven
so
I
think
the
the
big
change
in
these
is
before
I
said
these
work
they're
gonna
completely
open
to
everyone.
Obviously,
now
with
the
Brown
Act,
we
do
have
a
bit
of
restrictions
there.
A
So
what
we're
gonna
do
is
I
want
to
encourage
everyone
to
volunteer
for
one
or
two
of
these.
You
do
not
have
a
mandate
to
participate.
So
if
you
think
your
decision-making
and
you're
perfectly
comfortable
in
this
environment
and
want
to
stay
here,
that's
fine.
You
don't
need
to
volunteer
for
one
of
these.
A
Each
group
is
going
to
be
limited
to
ten
or
twelve
members,
and
what
I'm
going
to
do
is
I'm
going
to
send
out
an
email
later
this
week
with
either
some
really
cool
technology
poll
or
a
real,
simple
form
that
you
will
prioritize
your
top
three
groups
that
you'd
like
to
participate
in
and
then
Dave
and
I
will
go
through
and
try
to
accommodate
everyone's
needs.
So
these
five
groups,
you
know
10
to
12
members.
A
Second,
we
tried
to
think
through
how
each
of
these
groups
for
for
continuity,
would
report
back
into
the
sag.
So,
as
I
mentioned,
we're
gonna
kind
of
try
to
define,
you
know
the
topic,
that's
going
to
be
addressed
and
and
what
success
looks
like
that's
gonna
be
really
important
as
well.
As
you
know
what
the
data
is
gonna
do.
Is
we
really
want
to
identify
kind
of
a
base
line
set
of
conditions?
A
And
you
know
that's
where
you
know
the
work
that's
been
done
thus
far,
but
also
the
tools,
city
requirements
that
are
already
on
the
book.
You
guys
might
want
to
do
something
and
we
can
say
well
wait
a
minute.
We
already
have
a
policy
that
does
that
or
you
know
someone
else
is
going
to
do
that.
Thirdly,
the
opportunities
that
we
have
with
this
we've
talked
a
lot
about
that.
A
You
know
I
could
probably
pick
out
four
or
five
already
that
I
know
are
gonna,
come
out
just
based
off
of
the
conversations
but
those
opportunities
and
then
funnel
into
the
solutions-
and
this
is
you
know
where
we'll
really
dive
into
meeting
number
two
on
what
those
possible
solutions
are.
You
know
these
you
know
could
be
you
know,
as
we
say,
the
word
word:
qualitative
or
quantitative.
These
can
take
really
any
form
and
we
want
to
be
completely
flexible
to
you
guys
in
the
way
you
develop
these
possible
solutions.
A
So
the
the
table
down
below
is
kind
of
just
a
possible
construct
and
framework
that
we're
gonna
follow,
but
again
we're
gonna
try
as
staff
to
be
as
nimble
through
this
process
as
we
can
and
I'm
gonna
turn
it
over
to
Dave,
because
we're
gonna
take
a
shot
at
further
refining
kind
of
what
these
five
buckets
are.
I'm.
Sorry,
we
have
a
few
questions,
so
I
think.
K
A
The
question
was:
can
an
alternate
alternate
participate
in
one
of
the
committee's
and
I?
Think?
Yes,
you
know
I'll
clarify
that
with
the
attorney's
office
and
I'll.
Do
that
clarification
to
come
back
to
you,
you
know
and
and
I
will
say,
when
I
sent
out
the
email.
You
know
think
about
what
you
want
to
participate
in,
but
also
you
know
it's.
It's
really
important
we're
not
here
just
for
for
like-minded
opinions.
A
How
we're
gonna
all
agree
on
something
it's
about
having
differing
opinions,
so
you
might
not
be
interested
in
one
subject,
but
you
might
want
to
know
more
about
it
and
add
a
different
point
of
view.
If
that's
gonna
be
really
important,
that's
part
of
civil
discourse
and
we
have
the
group
agreements
to
come
back
to
so
you
know
I'm
not
mandating
that
you
volunteer
for
any
of
these,
but
I
think
it'd
be
really
good
to
have
kind
of
broad
participation
and
then
everyone
kind
of
knowing
two
or
three
things
on
a
detailed
level.
F
Ok
I'm
back
again,
so
these
solution
group
topics
that
we
have
listed
here,
we
realize
they're,
just
their
large
buckets
we're
trying
our
best
to
keep
this
to
around
5
solution
groups,
recognizing
that
we're
gonna
try
to
have
two
meetings
with
these
groups
over
the
next
few
weeks
to
couple
months,
and
we
want
to
be
able
to
get
to
a
point
where
we
have
solutions
to
bring
back
to
the
group
at
the
same
time
really
respect
your
time.
That's
going
into
this
and
we've
heard
from
others
as
well.
F
We
added
a
couple
extras
here,
including
the
neighborhood
quality
of
life,
you've
seen
transportation
access
and
traffic,
you've
seen
jobs,
education,
economic
development,
housing
displacement
and
gentrification
obviously
has
come
up
repeatedly
and
parks,
public
space
and
sustainability.
So
we
have
these
five
buckets
identified
now
and
I
want
to
just
point
out
that
we
have
these
cross-cutting
topics
that
we
anticipate
every
group.
Thinking
about,
as
you
go
through
the
process,
including
how
the
solutions
will
impact
people's
lives,
how
will
the
solutions,
impact
equity
and
opportunity?
What
are
the
implications
again
for
the
surrounding
neighborhoods?
F
Even
if
we
have
a
subgroup?
Excuse
me
a
solution
group
on
neighbor
quality
life.
The
neighborhoods
surrounding
this
area
are
gonna,
be
impacted
by
every
single
one
of
those
topics.
We
really
want
you
to
think
about
that
and
then,
as
we
talked
about
before,
really
what
are
the
potential
model,
solutions
and
options
that
should
be
considered.
N
A
A
A
N
F
N
A
A
great
question,
so
the
the
original
good
neighbor
committee,
actually
one
of
the
requirements,
was
a
construction
mitigation
plan
that
we
needed
to
be
developed.
You
know
not
just
for
the
baseball
stadium
but
for
all
levels
of
transit
coming
into
the
area
and
I
would
suggest
that
that
kind
of
fits
under
neighborhood
quality
of
life,
okay,.
P
Maria
no
Alfred
Anna's,
no
Silicon
Valley
rising
I
was
hoping
to
hear
a
little
bit
more
about
the
grouping
of
jobs,
education
and
economic
development.
That's
like
a
lot
just
to
say
little,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
we've
articulated
I
think
heard
from
several
folks
is
around
jobs,
being
a
big
area
and
education
being
a
big
area
and
I
am
concerned
about
putting
these
three
topics
together
and
having
being
able
to
actually
have
a
robust
conversation.
That
would
result
in
anything
helpful.
P
A
So
that
that's
a
really
helpful
suggestion,
you
know
I
would
say
firm
from
you
know
a
staff
perspective.
You
know
we're
trying
to
create.
You
know
and
Dave
said
cap
it
at
five
to
make
it
manageable
for
us,
so
we're
able
to
bring
you
the
information
and
do
the
staff
work
in
between
these
meetings
in
these
groups,
but
totally
understand
that
that
one
group
may
be
a
bit
ambitious,
I
would
say:
I
would
I
would
side
on
the
caution
of
you
know
we're
trying
to
do
two
meetings.
A
K
C
Yeah
I
had
the
same
concern
about
that
group
I,
so
I
would
just
agree
that
we
either
need
to
section
them
out
or
devote
more
time
to
those
topics
and
particularly
not
come
up
with
like
one
solution
that
we
think
solves
all
three
of
them
just
cuz.
It
mentions
them
in
the
title,
but
the
other
thing
I
had
was
just
on
the
bringing
the
public
in
and
having
public
comment
at
these
meetings.
C
I
know
as
a
committee
member
I
would,
especially
in
these
solutions
groups
like
to
hear
a
lot
more
from
the
public
I
understand
some
of
reasoning.
Why
we're
leaving
public
comment
at
the
end
to
these
meetings,
but,
as
you
can
see
from
the
audience
like
at
least
half
of
the
people
have
left,
if
not
more
so,
I
do
have
concerns
about
that.
C
F
A
great
point,
sir,
we'll
definitely
be
cognizant
of
that
to
make
sure
that
we
allow
for
folks
to
come
and
share
their
ideas
and
make
it
at
times
of
convenient
and
just
one
follow-up
to
your
initial
point.
We
did.
We
see
these
as
large
topics
or
the
kind
of
big
picture,
high
level
topics,
and
then
each
within
them
have
subtopics
that
will
have
individual
solutions
for
those
subtopics.
F
So
what
this
table
shows
you
those
topics
running
down
the
left-hand
side,
but
really
products,
you
probably
should
say
subtopics
that
could
each
have
their
own
background
opportunities
and
solutions,
so
it
wouldn't
necessarily
have
to
all
be
gathered
under
one
potential
solution.
So
that's
a
great
point
and
something
to
think
about
as
we
go
through
this
okay.
I
Jeffrey
yeah
just
a
question
on
the
on
the
timing
around
this
I'm
a
little
bit
concerned
seeing
the
kind
of
earlier
schedule.
So
we
created
a
subcommittee
on
you
know,
for
instance,
the
housing
displacement
and
gentrification.
It
meets
two
to
three
four
times.
However,
many
times
brings
back
for
a
presentation.
I
Those
ideas
would
have
had
to
come
to
the
table
much
much
earlier,
and
you
know
the
city
and
Google
will
be
negotiating
and
intensely
about
what
that
agreement
looks
like
I.
Just
worry
a
little
bit.
You
know
our
good
ideas
be
all
for
naught
because
the
cakes
already
baked
by
the
time
we
present,
or
else
it's
just
unrealistic,
to
think
that
an
mo
used
brought
to
Council.
You
know
two
weeks
later
based
off
of
our
advising
and
a
late
August
presentation.
If.
A
I
A
And
I
think
we're
gonna
staff,
the
facilitator
staff
we're
spending
a
lot
of
time
over
the
next
few
weeks
on
some
of
those
regional
meetings
actually
booking
those
we're
gonna
come
back
with
the
solution
group.
The
meeting
dates
the
locations
I
do
think
will
have
a
much
more
firm
timeline
for
the
group
on
the
website
and
the
coming
week,
but
also
when
we
come
back
as
in
a
group
in
three
weeks.
So
a
lot
of
that
will
be
nailed
down.
F
K
A
Yeah,
you
always
leave
those
ones
to
me,
you
know
I
I
would
say
just
you
know,
Michael
or
Google
is
another
participant
in
this
process.
So
I
think
there
are
free
and
clear
to
just
as
you
guys
do
you.
A
Themselves
or
or
you
know,
pick
the
three
they'd
like
to
participate
in.
Obviously
it's
important
that
those
groups
are
reporting
out
in
an
appropriate
way
to
this
group,
so
Michael
and
others
at
Google
can
kind
of
hear
those
concerns.
I
think
that's
the
more
the
more
pressing
part
in
the
near
term.
F
F
K
F
P
Wanted
to
quickly
follow
up
on
something
that
bow
Maria
Noel
Fernandez
look
valley,
rising,
something
that
bill
raised
in
terms
of
process
of
being
able
to
make
recommendations
on
experts
to
bring
into
these
non
subcommittee
subcommittees.
How
should
we
be
doing
that
and
what
does
that
process
look
like,
and
how
can
we
also
make
sure
we're
tapping
the
expertise
in
the
room,
because
there's
so
many
folks
that
can
you
know
really
bring
their
expertise
to
this
absolutely.
A
F
Before
we
do
sorry,
but
I,
just
so
I
want
to
confirm
that
these
now
are
the
buckets
so
we're
gonna
look
at
Maria
to
your
point.
We
could
look
at
potentially
moving
education
out
of
that
group
and
have
it
on
its
own.
We
could,
when
we
email
you
all
out,
if
you
have
any
input
on
that
or
want
to
be
specifically
part
of
that
topic
area
or
so
are
a
solution
group.
We
could
look
at
that
at
that
time
and
just
get
that
finalized
and
move
forward.
So
sound
good.
D
Preservation
Action
Council
just
a
couple
of
comments
on
the
public
process.
One
whatever
documents
have
been
provided
to
the
committee
is
best
I
can
tell
have
not
been
posted
on
the
website
since
the
beginning
other
than
the
presentation
from
the
first
meeting
and
the
minutes.
So
if
there
have
been
documents
have
been
going
to
the
committee,
it
would
be
helpful
to
have
those
posted
and
available
to
the
public.
Also,
the
minutes
don't
properly
reflect
the
public
comments.
It
indicates
only
who
the
speakers
were
and
I
think
just
a
line
item
about
what
comments
were
made.
D
I
think
some
of
the
comments
have
been
valuable,
not
necessarily
mine,
but
others
have
been,
and
then
I
think
it'd
be
good
as
a
permanent
record
to
have
that
in
the
minutes,
and
also
the
opportunity
I
think
tonight
was
missed
in
the
common
presentation
that
was
I.
Think
is
a
very
positive
things
that
came
out
of
that.
As
you
may
know,
historic
preservation
does
not
have
a
voice
on
this
panel.
D
So
we're
looking
to
you
many
of
you
to
be
that
voice
and
I
think
an
opportunity
was
missed
to
not
just
raise
the
issue
that
there's
a
lot
of
historic
resources
on
those
sites
that
we're
talking
about
and
the
fact
that
the
presenters
aren't
here
to
hear
this
now
dilutes
even
further
the
kamae
making
the
comments.
I
think
it's
very
important
and
we
asked
it
hopefully
you'll.
Keep
that
in
mind,
as
the
discussions
continue.
Thank
you
Brian.
O
F
Sorry
in
the
future,
folks
that
the
SAG
shouldn't
directly
report
back
to
the
public,
we
take
those
comments
back
then
we
could
come
back
and
give
them
those
answers
in
the
next
meeting
and
Brian.
Just
real
quick
to
your
question.
Everything
is
starting
to
be
posted
to
the
website,
including
summary
notes
that
have
all
the
comments
from
the
SOG
members
as
well
as
the
public
as
well,
so
that
should
be
getting
posted
up
there
soon.
E
That
now
goes
from
basically
Midtown
and
will
open
all
the
way
up
to
the
Santa
Cruz
Mountains,
and
it's
this
last
mile
will
tie
everything
together
and
will
connect
to
the
Guadalupe
the
cloud
transit
to
the
Google
and
for
dared
on
both
echo
Harvey's
comments
about
freeing
the
Creek
from
the
pipe
and
fix
up
the
local,
los
gatos
Guadalupe
as
a
attraction
for
the
area
making
kind
of
a
river
rock
make
it
an
attraction
area.
Also,
we
have
excellent
biking
weather
here.
It
was
noted.
E
We
have
perfect
biking
whether
people
can
commute
three
four
or
five
miles
quite
easily,
so
you
have
a
lot
of
residents
can
come
in
from
the
east
side.
So
when
you're
planning
these
things
plan
for
bike
bridges
over
101
ask
for
connections
to
the
area,
so
people
can
get
to
the
area,
make
the
whole
area
here
in
an
attraction.
E
So
it's
not
a
self
control,
enclosed
or
fenced
in
area,
but
be
inviting
and
it
being
meshed
in
the
area
and
I
also
had
my
notes
here
to
embrace
the
historic
structures
in
the
community
tie
into
the
area.
Don't
just
pave
over
everything,
but
you
can
join
it.
They
add
character
and
bright
area,
and
this
area
should
be
mixed-use.
You
don't
want
it
to
be
just
businesses
only.
You
want
to
have
it,
so
it's
not
a
desert
in
the
weekend,
so
you
wanted
people
live
in
there.
E
F
You
thank
you
and
just
remind
folks.
You
do
have
representative
Google
here
in
the
room.
You
have
Xavier
here
in
the
crowd.
You
have
Michael,
so
it's
definitely
being
heard
so
don't
think
it's
not
being
heard
and
Danny
I
believe
you're.
Next,
if
you
could,
let
us
know
your
name
when
you
step
up
his
way.
K
Okay,
cool
Danny,
Garza
mexican-american
political
association,
chapter
chair
today,
I
am
here
also
as
dr.
Doyle,
ad-hoc
recently
retired
director
large
now,
also
to
my
comments:
I'm,
a
30-year
retired
Union
iron
worker
and
the
two
gentlemen
from
from
Google
aren't
here.
But
but
these
gentlemen
are
I,
appreciate
that
the
gentleman
said
that
Google
and
Canada
worked
with
employees
that
had
federal
offenses,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
in
San
Jose
the
people
from
the
east
side
a
lot
of
construction
workers,
not
unlike
myself.
Fortunately,
I
didn't
have
a
federal
offense.
K
Some
employees
on
the
east
side
have
federal
offenses
and
you
cannot
work
at
HP.
You
cannot
work
at
Intel.
You
cannot
work
at
half
Lockheed
Martin
NASA.
You
can't
work
there
with
federal
offenses.
If
Google
does
that
here,
you're
gonna
cut
the
east
side
out
so
I'm
here
to
support
Maria
labor
and
the
issues
of
getting
minorities
working
at
Google,
Union
non-union,
hopefully
Union,
but
but.
L
K
F
D
S
And
I
live
in
the
garden,
Alameda
neighborhood
and
one
thing
I
didn't
understand:
I
mean
I,
listen
to
who's
on
this
board
and
I
mean
I'm.
Glad
everybody's
here
appreciate
everybody's
community
involvement,
but
the
garden
Alameda
never
got
really
included
and
we're
on
that
corridor
of
Stockton
Avenue
and
that's
the
garden
Alameda
to
the
west
of
Stockton,
and
you
know,
I,
don't
know
how
this
panel
ever
got
created,
but
anyway
we
never
got
heard
that
we
could
be
part
of
it.
S
So
we
didn't
so
anyone
here
I
am,
and
we
appreciate,
though,
having
the
opportunity
to
talk,
and
so
one
of
the
issues
like
we
always
talk
about
downtown
and
yet
the
corridors
that
are
going
into
downtown
like
Stockton
Avenue
like
Taylor
Street,
as
it
turns
into
Negley
and
goes
downtown
as
well.
We
need
those
to
be
really
livable
streets
that
have
good
traffic.
S
Calming
Stockton
Avenue
really
needs
traffic
traffic
calming
that
the
Alameda
has
been
improved
and
a
lot
of
the
speed
is
now
coming
on
to
Stockton
Avenue,
because
the
Alameda
has
a
lot
of
traffic
great
traffic
calming,
but
we
still
going
to
have
bike
lanes
on
the
Alameda
and
we
really
need
bike
lanes
on
all
the
major
streets.
So
we
have
a
bike
lane
on
Stockton
Avenue,
but
people
are
going
like
80
miles
now
or
down
that
street,
and
so
it
doesn't
make
it
safe
for
bikers
and
there's
a
lot
of
accidents
on
that
street.
S
And
so
we
really
want
that
Street
to
become
a
livable
Street
by
having
a
tree-lined
median
in
the
middle.
The
way
out
the
Alameda
has
so
we
need
that
Street
as
an
entree
into
downtown
to
be
improved.
So
that's
one
issue
and
then,
of
course,
the
Taylor
Street
corridor
is
also
another
area
that
really
needs
to
be
improved
and
there's
a
lot
of
problems
with
speed
on
that
Street
as
well.
C
Thank
you,
I'm
Jenny
Kline
house,
with
Santa
Clara,
Valley,
Audubon
Society
for
someone
who's
been
advocating
in
San
Jose
for
nature
and
birds
and
creeks
for
a
long
time.
The
presentation
by
Google
that
looks
at
the
triple
bottom
line
and
actually
includes
the
word
nature,
with
very
very
refreshing
and
I,
really
like
to
see
that
actually
materialize.
What
a
missing
in
the
five
buckets
is.
How
do
you
bring
that
nature
into
those
buckets?
Usually
it
comes
in
mitigation,
or
we
want
to
do
this.
We're
gonna
meet
the
gate
this
way.
C
N
Hi
I'm
sandy
Perry
I'm,
with
affordable
housing
network
of
santa
clara
county,
I'm
also
associated
with
silicon
valley
rising.
My
main
concern
is
that
we
stop
displacement.
There
was
a
article
in
the
paper
yesterday
they
asked
people
what's
causing
the
housing
crisis
in
Silicon
Valley
and
the
number
one
answer
was
real
estate
developers.
The
number
two
answer
was
tech
companies,
but
I
don't
hear
the
tech
companies
addressing
this
issue.
I
didn't
hear
the
gentleman
tonight
addressing
this
issue.
We
need
some
kind
of
guarantees
that
this
project
is
not
going
to
displace
more
people.
N
We
already
have
enough
people
this
place.
These
people
that
Danny
is
talking
about
on
the
east
side
are
being
pushed
out.
Everybody
says:
we've
got
wonderful
diversity
in
San,
Jose,
well,
less
and
less
look
at
what
happened
in
Mountain
View
Mountain.
View's
diversity
is
decreasing.
It's
going
down
because
of
the
tech
industry.
We
have
got
to
have
responsible
development.
We've
got
to
have
Google,
make
a
pledge
not
to
increase
not
to
displace
one
more
person
with
this
project.
The
they're
kind
of
vague
proposals
and
the
vague
answers
we
heard
tonight
are
not
adequate.
N
We're
we're
suffering
from
just
a
major
crisis
which
another
thing
you
didn't
see
on
these
nice
slides
that
were
up
here.
You
didn't
see
the
tents
on
the
sidewalks
like
we
have
downtown.
What
is
is
that,
because
Google
is
just
gonna,
sweep
people
out
and
push
them
into
the
creeks
which
miss
Camacho
was
talking
about.
That's
not
acceptable.
We
have
to
address
this
issue
displacement
homelessness.
N
F
S
My
name
is
Marcie
kirsten
with
packs
people
acting
in
community
together.
I
want
to
reiterate,
I
really
appreciate,
Sarah's
comments
about
public
comment
and
someone
else
talked
about
it
as
well
and
I
want
to
suggest,
and
it
was
raised
in
the
Brown
Act
discussion
today
that
public
comment
can
occur
at
or
after
each
topic
and
that's
something
to
consider
that
might
make
a
lot
more
sense.
S
But
honestly
I
was
you
know,
I'm
coming
to
all
the
meetings
and
I
was
trying
to
put
together
what
we
heard
tonight
with
what
we
heard
at
the
last
meeting
about
the
NDA's
and
frankly,
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
how
the
NDA
is
signed
by
the
council
members
work
in
conjunction
with
the
Brown
Act
and
the
city
Sunshine
Act,
that's
just
something
that
I'm
ruminating
about
still
but
I
want
to
reiterate.
I
thought
the
presentation
by
Google
was
was
really
refreshing.
S
I
think
we
heard
that
word
and
I
appreciated
a
lot
of
what
I
heard,
except
I,
heard
a
lot
of
downtown
a
lot
downtown
repeated
repeatedly,
and
we
need
to
be
clear
as
we're
hearing
from
other
folks
from
some
of
you
folks
that
this
is
not
just
downtown.
It's
not
just
your
Adhan.
It's
all
this
whole
area.
It's
we
need
to
encourage
Google
to
have
that
broader
vision.
They
talked
about
some
really
great
broad
ideas.
Huge
ideas
I
mean
a
water
treatment
plant.
It's
amazing.
S
They
need
to
think
broadly
like
that
about
our
community
as
well
and
about
San,
Jose
and
so
I
think
we
need
to
encourage
that.
I
also
want
to
just
also
reiterate
Sandy's
point
the
Google
effect
it's
already
happening.
I
talked
to
folks
at
PAX,
who
are
already
being
not
only
their
rents
being
raised,
but
they're
being
told
Google
and
Google
people
are
knocking
on
my
door.
So
if
you
can't
pay
the
rent,
they
will
it's
happening
now
and
we
need
to
be
clear.
It's
happening
all
around
San
Jose.
Thank.
L
L
Two
things
dear
Adan
is
separated
from
downtown
by
two
to
varèse
strong
lines.
One
is
87
and
the
other
one
is
the
Guadalupe
River
I
would
love
to
see
that
design
to
get
the
the
87,
maybe
underground
or
to
some
extent,
not
above
ground
and
and
Guadalupe,
become
more
just
way
more
integrated
with
the
connection.
So
people
are
when
they
leave
here
Don.
They
really
want
to
go
downtown
and
don't
have
that
division.
That
needs
to
be
worked
out.
L
A
Okay,
so
that
brings
us
to
the
end
of
the
meeting.
I
want
to
review
a
few
next
steps
of
meeting
schedules
with
you
all
and
I
think
if
I
click
Next.
Yes,
it
blows
it
up
a
little
bit.
Thank
God.
So
just
a
few
changes
and
like
I
said
you
know,
Jeffrey's
question
we're
gonna
be
coming
back
with
kind
of
an
official
timeline
at
the
next
meeting,
so
things
would
be
more
fleshed
out.
One
change
I
wanted
to
talk
to
you
guys
about
is
those
citywide
meetings
on
the
very
top
one
through
four.
A
Those
were
originally
going
to
start
in
May
just
due
to
us
kind
of
shifting
and
coming
up
with
these
solution
groups
and
staff
needing
to
spend
some
time
there.
We're
gonna
push
those
back
to
to
the
end
of
June,
so
we
have
a
bit
more
time
to
plan
we're
gonna,
be
several
of
you
asked
to
help
with
those
and
reach
out
to
your
organization's,
your
support
groups.
A
So
between
now
and
the
next
meeting
in
the
following
meeting,
we
will
be
doing
that
with
several
of
you
and
then
we
also
probably
not
this
week
but
the
following
week,
we'll
be
sending
out
to
voluntary
meetings
for
any
of
you
want
to
participate
that
will
be
open
to
the
public
and
those
are
the
walking
tours
of
the
Dehradun
station
area.
We
heard
from
several
of
you
that
that
was
very
important
for
you
to
see
so
we're
likely
to
offer
one
on
a
weeknight
and
then
one
probably
on
a
Saturday
morning.
A
That'd
be
great
so
as
we
go
forward
to
next
meeting,
we
are
gonna
hear
more
about
this
station.
The
actual
station
heterodon
station
and
all
the
multimodal
transportation
coming
through
there
and
our
Department
of
Transportation
was
several
of
our
agency
partners.
Here
will
help
lead
that
conversation
and
then
we're
gonna
do
ideas
for
dear
Adan
or
TED
Talks,
which
I'm
excited
about.
So
let's
talk
a
little
bit
about
those.
A
This
is
your
opportunity
to
be
creative,
submit.
You
know
your
idea
I'm
the
least
creative
person
in
this
room,
so
I'm
just
gonna,
throw
out
something
that
I
heard
today.
I'm
willing
to
bet
everyone
pizza
at
for
Street
pizza
on
me
that
probably
someone
in
this
area
of
the
room
does
a
presentation
on
daylighting
the
los
gatos
creek,
I'm
so
that
that's
kind
of
the
stuff
we're
looking
for.
What's
something
that
we've
heard,
you
know
another
great
example
kathy
sutherland
about
the
access
to
elementary
schools.
A
A
Okay,
so
in
all
likelihood
this
will
probably
bleed
over
into
the
next
meeting
after
that
as
well,
which
is
fine,
because
we
want
to
make
sure
everyone
has
an
opportunity
to
do
this.
So
I'm
gonna
send
out
an
email
reminder
and
try
and
get
you
know,
people
to
say.
Yes,
I'm
officially
and
I'm
gonna
do.
This
will
collect
the
presentations
from
you
the
friday
before
on
the
27th,
so
we
can
just
get
them
queued
up,
feel
free
and
team
up.
If
you
don't
want
to
do
it
on
your
own,
you
know
kathy.
A
You
can
just
talk,
you
don't
have
to
do
sides
I'm,
very
visual,
so
I
need
slides
to
learn,
but
you
are
all
different,
so
you
don't
have
to
do
slides.
But
again,
this
is.
This
is
meant
to
be
fun.
It's
meant
to
be
creative,
so
throw
stuff
out
there.
You
know
doesn't
matter
if
it
doesn't
stick
or
if
you
think
it's
gonna
be
controversial
or
even,
if
you
think
someone
else
is
gonna,
do
the
same.
Exact
presentation
doesn't
matter.
A
Lastly,
I
think
we
sent
out
a
few
different
emails.
After
you
know,
letters
coming
into
city
staff
in
this
process
that
didn't
necessarily
get
to
the
committee,
so
you're
gonna
see
more,
let
you
know
emails
from
either
myself
or
Tara
Reid
who
you've
not
met
yet,
but
is
supporting
this
effort.
So
if
you
have
communications
that
need
to
go
out-
and
you
know
part
of
the
Brown
Act
thing
is,
you
know,
reply-all
do
an
email,
but
you
can
send
it
to
us
and
we
can
share
it
with
the
group.
A
So
please
send
it
to
Tara
Reid
or
myself,
and
then
our
next
meeting
is
going
to
be
April.
30Th
you're
gonna
get
a
lot
of
communication
for
me
between
now
and
then
just
about
the
meeting
the
solution
groups,
the
TED
talk,
so
I
apologize
in
advance
for
that
and
then
before
April
30th.
Hopefully
the
Dehradun
SJ
org
website
will
be
substantially
different
and
we're
gonna
kind
of
switch
to
a
different
platform.