►
From YouTube: MAR 21, 2018 | Station Area Advisory Group
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
right,
everyone
we're
gonna,
get
started
so
welcome
to
the
our
first
meeting.
We
we
had
an
orientation
three
weeks
ago,
but
this
is
our
actual
first
meeting
so
welcome
and
thank
you
for
being
here.
I'm
just
gonna
start
with
a
little
bit
of
housekeeping
and
logistics
and
they
hand
it
over
to
Dave
and
Matt
a
few
things.
We
do
have
interpreters
in
the
back
spanish
interpreters.
If
anyone
needs
it
and
where
are
the
interpreters
sorry
can
you
guys
make
the
announcement
really
quick
as
well.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
A
number
of
you,
because
I
forgot
to
mention
last
meeting
forgot
to
validate
your
parking.
So
there
is
parking
validation
in
the
back
I.
Don't
want
to
be
responsible
for
that.
So
I'll
probably
mention
that
four
or
five
times
over
so
a
few
things.
We're
gonna
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
agenda.
You
have
an
agenda
item
for
this
meeting,
marked
Brown
Act
training,
so
that
is
a
state
requirement
and
because
the
City
Council
appointed
the
membership
of
this
group,
it
is
what
we
would
refer
to
as
a
brown
acted
group.
A
A
Where
we'll
discuss
this
a
little
bit
later
on
kind
of
one
of
the
requirements,
I
need
you
guys
to
know
about,
but
one
of
the
things
that
we
actually
need
to
do
as
a
brown
acted
group
which
we
were
even
kind
of
unaware
of
on
our
side.
On
the
staff
side
is
we
actually
need
you
to
approve
the
meeting
minutes
so
I
know.
Last
time
we
talked
about
we're
not
going
to
go
through
big
voting
procedures
and
all
of
this,
but
I
was
wrong
in
live
so
I
apologize.
A
So
with
the
meeting
minutes,
it's
fairly
simple.
I
know
that
we
have
some
members
here
that
weren't
here
last
time
you
can
vote
yes
or
no
on
it,
but
whoever
decides
to
make
the
motion
and
a
second.
How
do
be
her
at
the
last
meeting
is
the
way
the
rules
of
order
works.
So
Maria,
you
have
a
question
and
by
the
way,
can
you
please
use
the
microphone,
and
let
me
interrupt
you
really
quick.
A
We
have
made
improvements
to
City
Hall
AV,
so
everyone
knock
on
wood,
that
we
don't
have
the
problems
that
we
had
last
time
and
then
our
staff
actually
figured
out
how
we
can
do
a
broadcast,
so
Planning
Commission
is
going
on
or
will
be
going
on
pretty
soon,
but
this
is
also
unlike
the
orientation
being
broadcast
live
on
the
city
website.
So
audio
and
visual
Bria
I.
C
A
Excellent
question
so
moving
forward,
you're,
really
gonna
see
two
documents
and
you
and
you
did
see
two
documents.
One
was
in
an
email,
so
we
are
gonna,
follow
very
standard
kind
of
summary
meeting
minutes
for
the
Brown
Act
that
we
need
to
follow
all
city,
council,
committees
and
commissions
will
follow
the
format.
A
That's
in
front
of
you
now,
because
we're
doing
a
deeper
dive
on
issues
you
were
gonna
see
something
prior
to
meetings
like
facilitator
notes
that
Dave
and
Matt
will
be
responsible
giving
to
us
and
that
we'll
send
out,
and
that
will
kind
of
you'll
start
to
see.
The
themes
and
the
conversations
emerge
through
those
documents
as
well
and
I,
believe
kind
of
moving
forward
will
will
ensure
that
that
captures
kind
of
the
previous
meetings
as
well
Sarah.
D
A
A
E
Thank
you
very
much,
Lee
great
to
see
you
all
again
tonight.
Thank
you
for
being
here
and
good
to
see
some
new
faces.
As
Lee
mentioned,
we
do
have
a
very
packed
agenda
tonight.
We're
gonna
start
with
an
orientation
summary
which
will
cover
some
of
the
notes
that
were
sent
out
from
the
last
meeting
and
we're
also
going
to
talk
about
some
group
agreements
as
well.
We're
then
gonna
get
into
city
planning
goals.
E
Give
you
a
context
of
other
related
planning
efforts
that
have
gone
on
and
that
very
much
relate
to
this
effort,
roles
and
operation
of
this
of
the
saag.
We
heard
from
you
all
that
that's
something
we
we
want
to
provide
some
clarity
on
and
we
will
hear
tonight
and
then
we're
also
going
to
talk
about
the
community
engagement
plan.
Other
activities
happening
outside
of
just
the
SOG
meetings
to
get
your
input
on
those
as
well,
followed
by
public
comment
and
then
next
steps.
E
E
We,
these
are
the
group
agreements
that
we
came
up
with
based
on
the
input
we
got
from
you
all
that
we
can
go
through
real
quickly
here,
just
to
make
sure
we
captured
everything
correctly
and
we'll
go
through
these
every
at
the
beginning
of
every
meeting,
just
to
make
sure
that
we're
all
ingredients
of
how
we're
going
to
respect
and
treat
each
other
throughout
this
process.
So
just
real
quickly
recognize
that
one
person
speaks
at
a
time
and
all
others
are
active.
Listeners
and
I
want
to
remind
you
when
you
do
have
something
to
say.
E
If
you
could,
please
turn
your
nameplate
to
the
to
the
side
so
that
I
can
see
that
you
want
to
speak,
and
then
we
can
call
on
you
and
make
it
open
that
way.
Allow
everyone
the
opportunity
to
speak
and
share
their
ideas,
build
and
maintain
safe
space.
We
will
not
tolerate
attacks
on
individuals,
institutions
or
perspectives,
put
yourself
in
each
other's
shoes
and
respect
each
others
seek
to
understand,
diverse
viewpoints
and
ask
questions
for
clarification.
The
open
minded
and
allow
your
perspective
to
evolve
based
on
others.
Ideas
represent
the
diverse
community.
E
Recognizing
that
not
all
community
members
are
represented
at
the
table
know
got
you
moments.
We
want
to
keep
interactions
very
positive
and
encouraging
expect
that
conflicting
opinions
and
disagreements
are
natural
and
to
be
expected
work
to
find
common
ground
and
solutions
where
everyone
can
win.
We
recognize
the
best
outcomes
or
those
that
are
incorporate.
E
The
range
of
perspectives
recognize
the
intent
is
to
move
towards
solutions
or
desired
outcomes
and
work
together
to
think
big
and
create
an
innovative
and
forward-thinking
project
and,
lastly,
maybe,
most
importantly,
is
have
fun
and
make
new
friends
because
we're
all
here
to
work
together.
So
any
other
input
on
these
group
agreement
before
we
kind
of
finalize
them
and
we'll
have
these
printed
to
the
next
meeting
on
the
wall
again,
is
something
to
come
back
to.
As
we
go
through
every
meeting
here
forward,
any
input,
my
nursing
Andy-
yes,
hardly.
F
B
F
E
A
great
suggestion
Harvey:
we
appreciate
that.
Yes,
great
any
other
input
there,
no
okay,
great,
so
we'll
have
those
again
print
it
out
in
very
large
letters
to
make
sure
everyone
can
read
them
clearly
moving
forward.
So
at
the
orientation
meetings
we
had
a
lot
of
great
input.
We
talked
through
some
information
about
what
how
you
want
this
process
to
run
as
well
as
what
you
want
the
content
to
be
moving
forward.
This
is
a
bulleted
list
of
what
we,
the
feedback
that
we
heard.
E
I
could
go
through
these
again
here
real
quickly
and
you
could.
Let
me
know
if
there's
anything
missing,
it
was
to
clarify
the
role
in
decision-making
process
and
final
product
of
the
sag
through
this
process
in
2018
and
you'll,
see
that
in
this
presentation
today,
we're
going
to
get
into
that
and
provide
more
clarity,
receive
background
information
for
the
project
to
build
off
of
work
done
to
date.
E
Again,
we'll
be
talking
about
a
lot
of
that
tonight
in
the
planning
efforts
that
have
gone
on,
allow
the
SOG
members
an
opportunity
to
share
their
ideas,
expertise
and
experience.
That's
inherent
and
everything
we're
going
to
do
here,
but
we'll
also
have
a
panel
discussion
tonight
where
you
hear
from
some
SOG
members
and
moving
forward
you'll,
see
that
we're
gonna
have
opportunities
for
every
SOG
member
to
provide
their
perspective.
E
We
call
them
TED,
Talks
kind
of
version
we're
gonna
have
moving
forward,
so
that
should
be
fun,
create
a
space
for
interested
SOG
members
to
dig
deeper,
we'll
talk
about
that
tonight
as
well,
but
we've
developed
what
we're
calling
solution
groups
where
we're
gonna
dive
deep
into
the
hot
topics
that
come
out
of
this
process
and
we'll
provide
some
more
information.
There
provide
information
prior
to
each
meeting.
We
definitely
will
do
do
a
better
job
of
that,
starting
with
the
next
meeting.
We're
gonna
provide
you
with
information
of
what
we're
gonna
cover
it.
E
Each
meeting
we're
gonna
be
giving
you
some
homework
access
to
resources,
all
that
this
is
move
all
very
fast.
We're
gonna
get
ahead
of
the
game
and
make
sure
we
have
that
available,
for
you
provide
opportunities
for
the
community
to
be
engaged
in
the
process.
We'll
talk
about
that
tonight
as
well
and
then
be
transparent
about
the
process
and
outcomes
and
we'll
talk
about
how
that
will
be
integrated
as
well
so
before
we
move
away
from
this
process.
Slide
any
input
from
you
all
as
to
anything
that
maybe
wasn't
captured
at
the
last
meeting.
E
And
this
is
more
about
the
content,
it
kind
of
feeds
into
some
of
the
group
agreements
we
had
and
what
we
want
to
talk
about
here,
but
do
something
big,
a
bold
project
and
a
model
for
the
country.
These
are
again
input
that
we
received
directly
from
you
all
a
place
to
live,
work,
play
and
mix
of
uses
and
affordable
housing,
contribute
or
catalyze
a
downtown
where
everyone
always,
then
everyone
always
hoped
it
would
be
avoided,
mitigate
displacement
project,
that's
equitable,
sustainable
and
resilient.
E
A
create
a
diverse
environment,
public
places
have
a
world-class
transportation
system
and
build
a
project
that
works
for
all
people
of
San
Jose,
very
broad
strokes.
But
this
again
captures
a
lot
of
the
input
that
we
received
as
to
what
we
hope
this
process
will
include
any
input
there.
If
anything,
we
might
not
have
captured
all
right
we're
doing
well
on.
We
go
so
one
thing
actually
I'm.
Sorry,
one
thing
that
I
realized
I
didn't
cover,
as
part
of
the
group
agreement
says.
E
One
thing
that
came
up
during
our
last
meeting
was
a
disclosure
of
relationships
on
the
sog.
We
want
we're
gonna,
be
sending
out
a
document
to
you
all,
just
as
an
optional
opportunity
to
provide
any
input
if
there's
relationships
that
you
all
have
with
any
city
members,
any
other
SOG
members
or
Google,
and
that
will
be
made
open
to
the
public
as
well,
but
that'll
be
a
document
sent
around
as
an
optional
basis.
For
you
all
to
provide
that
input.
That's
one
thing:
I
forgot
to
note
earlier
I
think
that
covers
it.
A
So
you
know,
I
think
the
tenor
of
the
conversation
last
time,
if
I
were
to
kind
of
pinpoint
two
things
that
if
you
had
any
financial
relationship,
your
organization
with
the
city,
another
SOG
member
Google
or
a
lot
of
you
are
on
boards,
and
so
is
there.
You
know
a
relationship
at
a
board
level,
your
organization
in
the
city
or
any
other
sac
member,
so
I
would
say
kind
of
boils
down
to
those
two
things
in
my
mind,.
H
Director
role
last
June
and
I
find
her
to
be
just
a
very
inspiring
leader,
so
I'm
happy
to
have
her
here
tonight,
so
Rosen's
going
to
give
us
a
little
bit
about
the
envision
2040
plan
and
then
my
other
inspiring
colleague,
Nancy
Klein.
Our
director
of
real
estate
is
going
to
talk
about
the
basics
of
the
Deardon
Station
area
plan.
H
Nancy
was
deeply
involved
in
the
creation
of
this
plan,
along
with
our
planning,
department
and
Department
of
Transportation,
and
then
we're
going
to
have
to
brief,
roughly
10
12
minute
presentations
and
then
we're
going
to
take
questions.
So
we're
going
to
ask
you
what
about
this
information
is
interesting
or
relevant
and
what
other
questions
does
it
raise?.
C
We
have
a
great
vision
and
we
have
specific
goals
and
strategies
that
are
going
to
help
us
achieve
our
vision,
and
so
with
that
you
see
here
on
the
slide
I've
mentioned.
So
our
city's
general
plan
is
the
blueprint
for
how
the
city
is
going
to
grow
and
develop
over
the
long
term.
It's
a
policy
document
with
specific
goals
and
strategies
and
a
number
of
different
areas
and
I'll
go
over
those
shortly
and
then
lastly,
I
think
it's
important
to
realize
that
our
city's
general
plan
really
is
a
tool.
C
That's
used
for
decision
making,
so
city
departments
are
making
their
decisions.
You
know
based
upon
the
goals
and
strategies
in
our
general
plan.
You
know
our
Commission's
are
making
their
decisions
and
obviously
our
City
Council
are
making
their
decisions
based
on
the
ideas
and
the
strategies
identified
in
the
general
plan.
C
So
how
do
we
get
to
our
current
general
plan?
Our
current
general
plan?
It
was
approved
by
the
City
Council
back
in
November
of
2011,
and
there
was
an
enormous
amount
of
community
engagement
involved
in
the
process.
Now
I
wasn't
around,
but
I
understand
that
over
the
period
of
four
years
there
were
multiple
multiple
task
force
meetings
held
I
see
many
faces
here
around
the
table
that
participated
in
those
multiple
task
force
meetings.
There
were
hundreds
of
community
meetings
and
and
other
avenues
to
engage
the
community.
C
So,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
the
city
and
gay
over
5,000
residents
in
producing
this
document,
so
I
think
that's
pretty
remarkable,
and
actually
one
of
our
key
strategies
in
our
general
plan
is
based
on
community
based
planning,
and
so
we
think
that's
very
important
in
terms
of
establishing
and
developing
these
documents
so
I
mentioned
earlier.
We
have
several
strategies
in
our
general
plan.
C
We
have
a
focus
on
downtown,
so
we
have
very
specific
strategies
about
how
we
want
our
downtown
to
be
a
destination
and
how
we
see
that
growing
and
developing
all
the
long
over
the
long
term
and
another
important
element
is
that
you
know
the
participants
in
this
process
decided
that
we
want
it
to
be
a
healthy
City.
So
we
have
specific
strategies
about
how
our
neighborhoods
and
communities
can
grow
in
a
way.
That's
healthy,
and
so
that's
a
very
another,
very
important
component.
C
So
to
all
of
these
strategies
together
really
do
focus
on
our
overarching
vision
for
growing,
in
a
way
that
more
urban,
so
our
vision
is
for
a
city,
that's
growing.
In
a
way.
That's
more
urban
we've
decided
that
we're
a
B'nai
zhing,
so
we're
transitioning
from
our
history
of
suburban
development
to
one
that's
more
urban
in
nature,
so
we're
growing
up
and
not
out
so
no
more
of
the
sprawling
development,
but
wanting
to
grow
up
and
at
density
in
the
areas
that
have
been
identified,
we've
decided
that
we
want
to
be
a
city
for
people.
C
Another
key
goal
is
that
we
really
do
want
to
need
to
become
a
more
balanced
city
and
I'll
share
a
little
bit
more
about
where
we
stand
in
terms
of
our
residential
development
versus
how
many
jobs
were
actually
able
to
create
here
in
the
city
and
then.
Lastly,
we
want
to
be
a
city
that
achieves
environmental
sustainability.
Clearly
we
know,
particularly
in
our
region,
the
importance
and
the
unique
role.
C
I
think
that
the
city
of
San
Jose
can
play
in
terms
of
environmental
sustainability,
so
this
plan,
this
general
plan,
accommodates
significant
growth
and
I
want
to
spend
just
a
little
bit
of
time
here.
So
the
city
is
projected
to
grow
rapidly
between
now
and
2014.
So
we're
expecting-
and
this
is
based
on
population
projections-
we
are
expected
to
grow
by
really
over
four
hundred
and
seventy
thousand
new
people
between
now
and
twenty
forty,
that's
a
significant
amount
of
growth.
C
The
u.s.
census
actually
every
year
provides
estimates
on
how
cities
across
the
country
are
growing.
I,
remember
what
I
checked
I
think
was
back
in
2016.
They
came
out
with
their
estimates
at
that
time,
San
Jose
was
actually
adding
eleven
hundred
new
residents
each
month,
and
so
when
we
did
that
calculation
and
if
we
continue
to
grow
that
way,
if
we're
literally
adding
eleven
hundred
new
residents
every
month,
we
are
definitely
going
to
meet
this
projection
of
four
hundred
and
seventy
thousand
new
residents
by
by
2040.
C
So
how
are
we
going
to
accommodate
all
of
this
growth?
And-
and
this
is
really
the
key
component
of
our
general
plan
and
laying
out
the
strategies
of
of
where
this
rove
is
going
to
be
targeted,
and
so
we
are
being
very
deliberate.
We've
decided,
you
know
where
this
growth
is
going
to
occur,
so
we've
identified
specific
growth
areas
where
we
want
to
really
focus
on
mixed-use
development,
so
we
want
to
have
a
mix
of
uses.
C
C
Focusing
this
growth
on
major
transit
corridors.
That's
going
to
be
the
key
for
the
city
and
really
for
the
region
to
accommodate
all
the
growth
that
we're
going
to
have
we're
gonna
have
to
place
the
development
we're
going
to
have
to
place
the
housing
and
the
jobs
along
our
major
major
transit
corridors,
and
then
obviously
we
want
to
maintain
our
important,
very
important
employment.
Centers,
so
we
have
very
strong
policies
about
retaining
our
employment
lands.
They
are
crucial
for
our
city.
C
These
are
the
lands
that
we're
going
to
accommodate
the
growth
and
jobs
and
so
we're
very
clear
and
deliberate
about
not
converting
these
employment
lands
to
residential
uses,
and
so
then
the
growth,
the
specific
growth
area.
So
obviously
we
have
huge
opportunity
for
downtown
which
includes
Dehradun
to
accommodate
this
growth.
We
have
specific
plan
areas
such
as
communications,
Hill,
Midtown,
Jackson,
Taylor
and
Martha
Gardens,
where
these
plans
have
already
been
developed
with
community
members,
and
so
these
are
areas
that
can
receive
this
growth,
north
San
Jose.
C
Obviously
that
is
a
key
area
district
in
the
city,
where
we
want
to
accommodate
significant
growth
in
jobs
as
well
as
residential
units
as
well
and
then,
lastly,
probably
I
wouldn't
say,
most
importantly,
but
very
importantly,
is
our
concept
for
urban
villages.
So
many
of
you
are
probably
we
have
about
70
different
urban
villages
identified
across
the
city,
and
these
are
the
key
areas
where
we
expect
to
accommodate
this
additional
growth
and
development
and
and
one
thing
about
the
urban
villages.
C
We
are
planning
for
places
that
are
truly
great
places:
a
mix
of
abuses,
they're
going
to
be
rich
in
amenities
and
services
and
amenities
that
people
want
to
walk
to
and
that
necessarily
have
to
drive
to,
and
also
have
be
able
to
accommodate
job
development
as
well,
so
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
our
aspirations
for
more
jobs.
Probably
many
of
you
have
heard
the
term
that
we
use
here
in
the
city.
C
C
So
in
essence,
during
the
day
we
are
sending
our
to
other
cities
for
employees
instead
of
having
residents
from
other
cities
coming
into
San
Jose
for
their
jobs
and-
and
it's
very
interesting
I-
don't
know
if
you
can
see
all
of
the
cities,
but
you
know
it
goes
all
the
way
up
to
Houston.
You
know
even
for
the
city
of
Detroit,
you
know
they
are
actually
doing
a
better
job
in
terms
of
having
enough
jobs
for
their
for
their
residents
within
their
city
limits.
C
So
to
talk
about
why
we
want
to
grow
in
a
way,
that's
more
balanced.
There
are
lots
and
lots
of
benefits
to
that.
Obviously,
so
probably
number
one
to
many
of
us
here
is
reduced
traffic
congestion
right
to
help
out
with
our
commuting,
making
having
the
availability
for
people
to
not
spend
so
much
time
alone
in
their
cars
having
the
opportunity
as
we
grow
our
jobs
to
actually
locate
these
jobs
closer
to
our
residents,
to
where
people
are
living,
obviously
the
benefit
of
improving
our
air
quality
and
just
our
overall
quality
of
life.
C
C
Improving
our
air
quality,
so
one
important
fact,
I'd
hear
I'll
share
with
you-
is
that
actually
54
scent
of
the
cities
and
missions
actually
comes
from
transportation,
so
we're
spending
a
lot
of
time
in
our
vehicles
and
so
to
the
extent
that
we
can
reduce
that
we're
definitely
going
to
improve
our
air
quality
and
I'll.
Just
note
that,
just
last
month
our
City
Council
approved
the
climate,
smart
San
Jose,
and
this
is
our
plan
for
a
low-carbon
City
which
actually
implements
right
all
of
the
goals
and
the
strategies
that
we
have
in
our.
C
So
here
you'll
see
the
city
of
San
Jose,
we're
about
a
hundred
and
forty
two
dollars
per
capita
and
then
other
cities
are
just
way
way
beyond
us.
So
the
need
to
to
close
that
gap
is
so
important
for
the
city
and
then
one
of
the
I
think
very
aspirational
and
aggressive
goals
in
our
general
plan.
Is
our
aggressive
mode
shift
goals
so
you'll
see
here
that
currently
well?
Actually,
this
was
probably
back
in
2011.
C
C
And
in
talking
about
transportation
and
reducing
traffic
congestion
and
taking
advantage
of
our
existing
transit
investments
and
really
fully
leveraging
the
new
investments
that
we
know
are
coming
darrid
on
station
really
is
a
crucial
component
of
that.
So
you'll
see
here
in
this
slide
the
amount
of
trips
over
8,700
trips
going
in
and
out
of
the
station
with
a
2040
daily
trip
projection
of
69
thousand
trips
throughout
Dehradun
station.
C
Given
the
fact
that
we
have
the
transit
investments
coming,
our
plan
is
to
add
about
4,000
residential
units
to
downtown
and
about
10,000
new
jobs.
So
again
the
importance
of
focusing
the
growth
in
the
right
areas,
adding
the
density
along
our
transit
corridors
and
hubs,
absolutely
critical
for
us
reaching
our
goals
in
our
general
plan
and
I.
Think
with
that
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
Nancy
who's.
Going
to
give
you
an
overview
of
the
Dehradun
Station
area
plan.
I
Rosalind,
thank
you
so
very
much
and
I
just
wanted
to
say
good
evening.
Nancy
Kline,
the
director
of
real
estate
and
I'm,
very,
very
excited
to
be
here
with
you
tonight.
You
hear
excited
a
lot
because
we
all
get
to
work
on
this
together,
and
that
is
very
gratifying
and
I
also
want
to
say
it's
wonderful
to
look
around
the
table
and
see
great
number
of
people
who
we've
gotten
to
work
together
before
and
look
forward
to
meeting
and
working
with
a
great
number
of
new
folks,
the
dear
non-stationary,
a
plan.
I
I
went
back
just
to
make
sure
we
did
a
little
work
and
I
also
was
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
Michael
Brio
who's
in
the
back
of
the
room.
Who
was
a
cohort
who
also
worked
extensively?
Martin
Michael
heads
up
long
term
development
for
Rosalyn
and
so
later
on.
You
want
to
talk
we're
both
here
to
answer
questions,
but
the
Deardon
station
area
plan
actually
got
started
in
2009.
I
So
we've
been
talking
about
this
area
because
we
knew
this
was
coming,
and
so
a
lot
of
good
work
had
gone
on
many
months
of
collaborative
work
with
a
great
number
of
community
stakeholders,
including
the
transit
agencies,
began
and
worked
all
the
way
through
2009
and
2011
after
that.
Time
went
to
Council
with
an
approval
of
the
bones
of
the
plan
and
then
set
out
to
do
an
environmental
impact
report.
So
I
just
found
it
very
exciting.
I
You
see
some
of
the
components
of
the
long
term
goals,
but
I
also
pulled
up
the
memo
and
just
wanted
to
read
part
of
what
was
listed
as
the
guiding
principles,
because
I
think
it's
comforting
to
know.
There's
some
consistency
here
create
a
great
place
in
the
city
of
San
Jose,
that
is
both
a
local
and
regional
destination,
establish
a
land-use
plan
and
policy
framework
to
guide
future
development,
which
supports
transit,
ridership,
Foster's
economic
development
and
creates
a
world-class
destination,
improves
pedestrian
bicycle
transit
in
automobile
connectivity
between
the
station
and
the
adjacent
uses.
I
It's
a
highly
active
and
lively,
welcoming
pedestrian
and
bike
friendly
environment
and
develop
and
implement
an
urban
design
that
promotes
a
vibrant
and
well-connected
destination
area.
So
some
of
the
things
that
I'm
guessing
that
we've
got
here
will
resonate
and
carry
us
forward
with
the
common
themes.
Kim.
I
The
next
slide
over
all
that
development
capacity,
which
again
was
really
looking
at
from
a
window
of
2011,
said
about
about
five
million
square
feet
of
development
overall,
which
would
in
office
over
all
witching,
also
would
include
four
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
square
feet
of
retail,
about
2,500
homes
and
nine
hundred
hotel
rooms,
so
that
that
is
the
overall
area.
You
see
the
three
bubbles
north
central,
south,
blue,
pink
orange
and
they're,
designed
as
distinct
areas
with
different
purposes.
I'm,
just
gonna
walk
very
briefly
through
the
three
areas
to
the
north.
I
We
looked
at
an
innovation
district
with
jobs
that
were
co-working
and
incubators
and
looking
at
this
also
being
a
little
more
industrial
as
well
as
R&D
oriented
with
three
million
square
feet
of
office.
Eighty
thousand
square
foot
of
retail
not
much
in
the
way
of
homes
and
then
a
very
successful
si.
I
P
Center
got
happy
and
then
in
the
central
zone,
which
is
the
key
area,
of
course,
around
dear
Don,
and
was
at
that
time
intended
to
be
home
to
the
baseball
park
with
office,
emphasis,
transit
and
entertainment,
retail,
a
little
over
a
million
square
feet
of
office
plan,
a
hundred
and
forty
thousand
square
feet
of
retail
250
hotel
rooms
and
a
ball
park
in
the
southern
zone.
It
was
intended
to
be
more
of
a
emphasis
on
a
residential
mix.
I
J
I
G
The
2040
plan
and
Rosen's
presentation
emphasized
for
the
additional
housing
to
be
careful
about
the
housing
versus
jobs
to
address
the
housing
imbalance.
I
was
curious.
What
planning's
initial
comments
about
the
current
form
of
SB
827
would
be,
and
the
obvious
obvious
impact
on
housing
density
and
housing
units
that
that
would
have
if
it
was
applied
to
the
current
areas.
As
the
committee
bill
has
I
can.
I
Take
a
quick
start
at
that:
I
mean
San
Jose,
as
you
know,
we're
completely
committed
to
to
housing.
We
have
a
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
carry
of
units
in
our
general
plan,
so
we're
very
much
thinking
about
density
in
and
around
the
station,
so
we're
already
on
board
pardon
the
pun,
but
we
also
need
to
be
careful
about
proximity,
because
we
know
from
many
studies
that
it's
very
useful
to
have
jobs
right
on
top
of
the
station,
because
that
increases
transit
ridership.
I
L
G
What
are
your
thoughts
on,
given
that
those
changes
will
likely
significantly
Riis
the
value
of
both
the
public
lands
that
are
still
either
in
negotiation,
or
we
have
a
set
price
on
where
the
privately
purchased
lands
that
Google's
bought?
What
are
your
thoughts
on
policies?
Ensure
the
public
is
capturing
some
of
the
value
of
those
potential
changes
since
we're
talking
about
excitement
around
potentially
altering
the
plan
to
make
room
for
what
Google
wants.
I'll.
I
Begin
quickly
there,
thank
you
great
point.
So
a
couple
different
things
we
want
to
make
sure
and
it's
absolutely
happening
that
Google
is
paying
fair
market
value
for
land.
That's
that's
by
law,
what's
happening,
that's
already
expressed
intent
by
counsel
and
then,
in
addition
to
that,
we
will
be
working
as
a
group
on
community
benefits
and
we
will
look
at
the
metrics
and
benchmark
what
other
communities
are
doing.
G
Just
one
clarification
on
that:
the
price
for
the
sorrow,
owned
lands,
they're
priced
out
it
for
what
it's
zoned.
For
now,
what
the
current
planning
is
now,
so
it's
not
that's,
not
capturing
the
actual
market
value
after
any
adjustments
are
made
correct.
Actually,
look
if
you
read
the
appraisal,
it
says
you
know
it's.
It
has
the
the
FAR's,
based
on
the
current
planning
and
planning
for
that
you
can
build
at
seven
levels.
G
I
Will
find
anybody
around
the
room
will
find
that
appraisal
is
very
much
art,
not
science,
and
that,
if
you
look
back
a
year
ago,
priceand
dear
Don
was
literally
going
for
90
bucks,
a
square
foot,
so
other
people
would
say
other
appraisals
would
say
that
they're
already
baked
in
the
price
for
development,
when
right
now,
we
only
have
a
zoning
was
to
get
an
appraisal
at
current
value.
That's
what
appraisals
do
it's
at
current
value
and
currently
it's
an
industrial
value.
G
F
In
2008
2011
art,
7070
2011,
it
was
on
the
2040
plan
and
we
were
pushing
to
get
the
jobs
housing
imbalance
corrected
because
we
couldn't
pay
for
city
services
in
2015,
wasn't
16
the
review
we
were.
We
were
presented
a
plan
that
said
that,
indeed,
housing
could
actually
pay
for
itself
would
produce
enough
revenues.
If
was
built
at
a
certain
number
per
acre
and
I.
F
F
A
So
I
can
ask
Leslie,
Harvey
and
Kevin
to
join
me
here
and
since
Pete
and
Jonathan
are
right
here,
they'll
be
right
in
front
of
us,
so
the
five
of
them
were
on
the
good
neighbor
committee,
so
they're,
the
original,
five
or
I
don't
know
I
couldn't
come
up
with
a
better
name,
and
so
we
wanted
to.
You
know
this
process
of
the
good
neighbor
committee
kind
of
went
in
parallel
to
the
it
started
a
little
bit
before
the
dear
Adams
station
area,
planning,
effort
and
kind
of
helped
inform
that.
A
But
if
you
open
your
binders
I
believe
it
is
under
resources,
you
can
see
the
good
neighbor
committee
report.
You
know
it
was
much
more
of
a
tactical
document
in
a
lot
of
ways.
It
kind
of
spoke
to
you
know
what
really
needed
to
happen
on
the
ground.
We'll
probably
come
back
to
this
document
a
few
times,
but
I
thought
it
was
important,
especially
some
of
the
follow-up
we
did
after
the
last
orientation
for
you
to
hear
directly
from
the
five
of
them
kind
of
not
just
with
the
report,
but
also
process
or
anything
else.
A
N
F
L
K
J
So
what
I
recall
is
a
real
mindfulness
around
how
people
circulate
both
towards
downtown
so
making
obvious
bike
friendly,
pedestrian
friendly
path.
You
know
pathways
into
downtown,
as
well
as
back
into
the
neighborhoods
and
into
that
Alameda
business
district
and
the
one
thing
that
sticks
with
me
is
this:
the
economic
study
that
about
the
impact
of
a
ballpark,
they
came
back,
said,
there's
two
intangibles
about
having
a
major
league
sports
in
your
town.
However,
the
highest
and
best
economic
use
would
be
if
there
were
a
corporate
campus
on
the
site.
So.
O
It's
the
problem
with
going
last.
Is
everybody
eats
up
all
your
material
I
agree
with
Kevin
that
basically
the
art
and
the
iconic
structure
is
what
I
remember
most
of
it
and
with
Leslie
both
the
circulation,
the
traffic
patterns,
the
lack
of
traffic
patterns,
etc.
Are
more
important,
I
think
the
big
difference
between
this
panel
and
the
last
one
we
had
is
really
the
focus
on
the
ball
park.
If
you
remember
right,
the
ball
park
was
imminent.
It
was
gonna
happen.
O
It
was
really
any
day
and
I
certainly
felt
swept
up
in
that
in
that
discussion,
and
then
it
went
away
and
there
was
kind
of
a
flatness.
This
is
a
much
better
program.
It
seems
to
me
in
that
it's
a
little
more
distributed.
Yeah,
it's
one
master
developer
in
quote
marks,
but
it
seems
me,
like
it's
gonna,
be
an
easier
job
for
us
to
do.
A
Great,
so
we're
gonna
do
two
more
questions
and
just
really
quick-
and
this
was
kind
of
based
off
of
some
of
what
we
heard
you
know
in
between
meetings
from
some
of
the
committee
members.
But
how
do
you
think
this
group
should
build
upon
the
work
that
you
guys
did,
so
you
guys
laid
a
really
good
foundation?
What's
next,
that
the
group
should
really
focus
on.
J
K
I
think
we
talked
about
open
air
more
it's
and
things
like
that.
A
lot
of
artwork,
another
thing
that
we
could
build
on
in
this
group
that
I
think
we
had
as
we
actually
got
along
pretty
well,
we
didn't
have
a
whole
lot
of
really
controversy,
so
to
speak.
So
I
think
that's
why
we
were
able
to
accomplish
what
we
did
was
because
we
were
willing
to
work
together.
F
And
at
the
time
I
was
on
the
National
panel
for
Kaiser,
Permanente
and
I
was
going
to
various
cities
and
I'd
come
back
and
say
why
can't
we
have
an
area
in
San
Jose
like
San,
Diego
or
San
Antonio,
the
Riverwalk
etc,
says
so
went
to
all
these
cities
and
I
said
we
need
something:
vibrant
that
will
bring
us
a
destination.
We
have
the
weather,
we
have
the
climate,
but
we
don't
have
a
place
yet.
So
that
was
my
main
thing.
N
Okay,
I
the
dynamics
of
a
baseball
stadium
versus
a
corporate
campus
is
gonna
change.
This
all
significantly
at
least
how
we
looked
at
it.
So
to
answer
your
question.
I
think
we
need
to
build
on
the
idea
that
we're
gonna
have
a
lot
more
people
every
single
day
versus
180,
some
odd
days,
because
they're
162
baseball
games
and
then
I
think
one
of
the
challenges
I
think
we
might
have
is
because,
if
I
remember
correctly,
google
has
a
cafeteria
for
their
employees,
so
they're
not
really
gonna
be
eating
in
our
restaurants.
N
That
much
so
that's
concern,
and
then
you
know
everything
that
Harvey
had
to
say
I.
Second,
that
so
I
think
what
we
need
to
do
is
build
on
a
new
perspective.
Instead
of
a
baseball
stadium,
we
got
this
corporate
campus
one
of
the
things
that
I
do
remember
and
what
Kevin
was
saying
is
that
we
did
get
along
because
there
were
no
hidden
agendas
or
people
didn't
come
in
with
well,
you
have
to
do
this
or
you
have
to
do
that.
There
was.
There
was
no
hidden
agendas.
We
all
were
in
it
together.
A
Great
point
so
last
question:
a
lot
has
changed
it's
you
know
we're
going
from.
You
know
a
baseball
stadium
and
by
the
way,
if
you
googled
erat
on
station
good
neighbor
committee
and
look
at
images,
that's
what
comes
up.
Where
should
the
ballpark
go?
So
we
are
in
a
much
different
conversation,
and
so
you
know,
what's
your
advice
to
you
know
us
that
are
running
the
process
but
to
the
rest
of
the
group
on
on
how
we
actually
pivot
that
process
and
and
focus
on.
You
know
something
that
has
a
greater
use.
Johnathan's,
absolutely
right.
A
You
know
80
games
versus
you
know:
company,
that's
gonna,
have
365
days
of
business
and
and
a
robust
activation
of
the
surrounding
area
and
station
back
to
you
Jonathan.
How
would
you
know
it?
Maybe
this
is,
you
know,
an
unfair
question,
but
how
does
the
conversation
pivot
and
and
how
should
we
focus
and
kind
of
take
the
model
of
the
good
neighbor
committee
in
the
collaboration
there,
but
you
know
focus
that
on
you
know
this
station
and
you
know
quite
honestly,
the
you
know
the
big
thing.
A
That's
not
in
the
report
that
you
guys
see
which
Leslie
kind
of
alluded
to
was.
You
know.
Kip
Harkness
and
myself
ran
the
good
neighbor
committee
process
and
we
didn't
let
the
committee
put
you
know.
One
of
the
recommendations
in
was
no
matter
what
the
city
has
to
go,
find
a
master
developer,
because
at
the
time
we
kind
of
thought
that
was
not
a
feasible
solution
and
where
the
market
was
and
where
downtown
was
so
now
we
actually
have
the
possibility
of
a
master
developer.
P
N
F
Was
reading
today,
a
piece
about
transportation
and
how
most
public
transportation
systems
in
the
country
are
losing
ridership
and
I?
Think
one
of
the
things
that
we
have
to
be
very
careful
about
in
this
area
is
to
create
connectivity
and
to
make
the
connectivity
not
for
cars
as
much
as
it
is
for
public
transport
and
for
bicycles
and
pedestrians.
K
This
is
a
tough
one,
I
think
it's
a
matter
of
intensity
with
a
ball
park.
We
were
looking
at
traffic
patterns.
We
went
to
some
has
some
interesting
Studies
on
how
traffic
is
rerouted
for
like
the
shark
tank
and
games
and
and
how
you
get
people
in
and
out
efficiently
and
with
a
ball
park.
You
know
with
about
80,000,
you
know.
Well,
actually
it
was
yeah.
I,
don't
know,
maybe
about
it
was
a
small
one.
Yeah
it
was
it
was.
J
For
me,
it's
it's
social
equity,
we're
in
the
2009.
We
were
in
the
recession
and
now
we're
a
boom
in
land
rush
and
it's
it's
kind
of
nuts.
And
so
how
do
we
take
advantage
of
any
kind
of
tax
incentives,
a
lot
going
on
Sacramento
right
now
around
housing?
But
how
do
we
craft
a
project
that
really
benefits
as
many
people
as
possible
without
you
know,
overburdening
Google,
but
no
making
sure
that
what
comes
out
of
here,
it
really
is
benefits
the
entire
community
I.
O
Think
if
you
look
the
generic
nature
of
the
maps
that
were
thrown
out
before
the
sort
of
the
business
area
up
at
the
top,
the
hotel
area
in
the
bottom
and
then
the
residential
or
whatever,
was
in
the
center,
it
shows
that
we
really
didn't
have
any
specific
goals
in
mind.
We
kind
of
felt
that
there
were
things
happening,
but
it
was
really
a
focus
on
the
ball
park
and
what
it
might
bring
with
it,
and
we
doors
to
us
came
along
for
a
ride.
I,
don't
think
in
any
of
our
meetings.
O
We
ever
heard
the
words
displacement
or
gentrification
rudder
at
all,
and
maybe
they
didn't
exist
as
much
I
for
one
would
really
like
to
see
us
study
those
quite
carefully
and
get
some
hard
numbers
around
them.
You
know
how
many
people
are
actually
living
in.
There
are
gonna
be
moved
out
by
this.
Is
this
footprint
bigger
than
the
other?
How
will
it
ripple
out
from
the
actual
station
footprint
itself?
Those
are
my
concerns.
Two.
M
A
You
know
we
with
the
way
that
cross
this
ran.
We
actually
never
got
to
that
level
of
detail,
so
this
will
be
kind
of
a
new
topic.
You
know
whether
it
be
you
know
the
small
business
displacement
or
the
housing
displacement
with
this
development.
So
this
will
be
something
new
that
we
kind
of
confront
together.
But
you
know,
as
Pete
said
it
wasn't,
it
wasn't
a
term
it
wasn't.
It
concern.
You
know,
for
a
variety
of
reasons.
In
2009,
when
we
began.
L
Yes,
that
vanished
with
Greenbelt
Alliance
I'm
interested
to
hear
more
about
how
the
conversation
evolved
around
some
of
the
placemaking
features
that
that
integrated,
the
the
creek
and
the
other
natural
amenities.
It
seems
like
we've,
made
a
lot
of
progress
on
that
front
over
the
five
six
years
of
the
process
and
interested
to
hear
since
I
Michele
Beasley
on
our
staff
was
around
during
that
point,
how
you
started
from
point
A
and
arrived
at
point
B
around
that,
so
that
we
can
pick
up
where
you
were
at
point.
B
I.
Think.
J
We
were
looking
at
opportunities,
you
have
Los
Gatos,
Creek
and
so
the
OP
tunity
to
do
creekside
ining
brought
up
the
issue
of
potentially
daylighting
los
gatos
Krieg
tying
in
to
the
trails
and
and
again
that's
a
great
commute
network
for
people
walking
or
biking.
We
didn't
honestly
get
into
that
level
of
detail
is
more
conceptual.
Let's
make
sure
we
take
advantage
of
the
Los
Gatos
Creek
Trail,
the
Guadalupe
River
Trail,
the
closest
of
Guadalupe
River
Park,
and
really
make
sure
that
that's
integrated
into
the
project
art
was.
J
You
know
this
notion
of
signature
art
pieces
was
a
big
part
of
it
again
that
there's
this
deny
dynamic
public
space.
When
you
can't
come
out
of
the
train
station
to
go
to
the
ballpark
or
go
whatever
you
know
whatever
we're
doing,
but
it
was.
It
was
really
conscious
about
making
this
a
really
interesting
place
to
be.
F
And
I'll,
second,
that
and
I
kept
coming
back
from
I
had
a
couple
of
meetings
during
that
time
in
in
San
Antonio,
which
I
thought
was
supposed
to
be
a
bit
of
a
city
and
it
turned
out.
The
Riverwalk
really
attracted
me,
but
I
also
was
on.
Leslie,
has
servers
because
I
also
was
working
on
riparian
corridor
policy,
which
means
you
need
to
set
that,
and
they
certainly
didn't
do
that
there.
B
Yes,
I
wanted
to
go
back
to
a
less
Leigh's
comment,
maybe
in
the
last
round
where
she
talked
about
social
equity
and
I
was
wondering
if
thought
had
been
given
to
creating
a
wide
variety
of
types
of
jobs,
not
just
the
high
level
jobs
that
sort
of
the
the
spectrum
of
jobs
that
would
allow.
You
know,
variety
of
people
to
you
know,
reside
in
this
area.
J
K
I
know
that
one
of
the
things
that
since
I'm
in
a
joining
neighborhood
that
we
were
concerned
about
what
the
ballpark
was,
that
all
we
would
get
are
these
part-time
jobs
of
you
know:
selling
peanuts,
popcorn
and
candied
apples
and
cleaning
up
the
ballpark.
So
it
was
kind
of
you
know,
blue-collar
type
work
and
we
thought
wow.
This
is
all
we're
gonna
get
out
of
this,
so
you
know
I
think
we
were
concerned
about
having
a
mix
of
jobs
that
had
more
of
a
professional
orientation.
K
K
Well,
not
I'm,
not
gonna,
say
originally,
but
when
the
Del
Monte
cannery
was
there,
many
of
the
people
from
our
neighborhood
would
walk
from
Gardner
to
the
Del
Monte
cannery
to
work.
So
it
was
very
much
you
know,
blue-collar
type
work,
so
we
didn't
want
to
have
a
repeat
of
that.
We
wanted
to
have
what
the
first
diversity
of
jobs
involved
in
the
area
does
that
help
out
at
all
yeah.
F
Another
question
and
that,
on
that
question
we
did
ask
several
times
and
never
got
a
real
answer
on
what
the
mix
of
jobs
would
be,
because
they
gave
us
a
jobs
number.
This
would
produce
as
many
jobs,
and
we
said
well,
what
are
the
quality
of
these
jobs?
What
are
the
pay
levels
of
these
jobs?
And
we
never
quite
got
that.
A
Yeah
and
a
lot
of
the
you
know
the
at
least
with
the
the
good
neighbor
committee.
From
my
recollection,
the
jobs
was
kind
of
focused
on
two
conversations.
It
was
you
know
the
the
first
part
of
that
good
neighbor
committee
process
was
really
to
kind
of
digest
the
economic
impact
report.
It
was
around
the
ballpark.
What
was
gonna
be
the
direct
and
indirect
economic
impacts
and
then
the
fiscal
impact
to
the
city
and
that
had
kind
of
a
mix
of
core
jobs
it
would
bring
to
the
surrounding
area.
So
there
was
some
discussion
of
that.
A
The
other
thing
just
because
everyone
brings
up
San
Antonio,
where
you
know
the
San
Antonio
walkway.
That
was
probably
the
one
area
that
there
was
actually
contentious.
You
know
among
the
good
neighbor
committee,
because
some
really
wanted
something
like
that,
and
others
felt
it
was
very
cookie
cutter
and
that
whatever
we
were
gonna
do
if
we
were
gonna
make
that
kind
of
investment
and
do
that
we
should
really
be
focusing
on.
A
B
K
K
They
brought
in
the
people
that
were
currently
working
with
s
AP,
to
explain
to
us
how
they
would
get
the
number
of
people
in
and
out
of,
yes,
the
area
because
of
si
P,
and
that
was
quite
fascinating
really
and
how
we
would
expand
it
because
you
know
at
that
point.
Si
P
is
like
you're,
only
worrying
about
getting
seventeen
thousand
five
hundred
and
sixty
three
people,
or
something
like
that
in
and
out
of
the
the
arena,
and
so
you
know,
a
ballpark
was
going
to
impact
out
by
at.
K
N
That
was
a
big
topic
in
our
meetings,
and
then
somebody
came
up
and
reminded
us
when
we
had
the
the
race
car
events
in
downtown
and
that
was
bringing
in
100
to
150
people
a
day.
So
we're
talking
only
about
yeah,
a
hundred
fifty
thousand
people
and
we're
only
talking
about.
Let's
say
there
was
a
concert
downtown
on
a
Thursday
night
like
music
in
the
park,
and
twenty
thousand
people
concert
at
sa
P
and
thirty
eight
thousand.
F
Hey
at
the
time,
I
had
fallen
off
a
bike
in
2007
broken
an
arm
and
finally,
gotten
back
on
my
bike
around
2009
and
as
I
discovered
in
trying
to
go
through
that
error.
There
were
a
lot
of
obstacles.
They
were
not
a
lot
of
safer
routes
for
me,
because
I
was
very
terrified
of
having
another
accident,
and
so
we
talked
a
lot
about
that
about
creating
bicycle
separation
from
the
traffic
patterns
and
also
making
sure
that,
whenever
possible,
that
any
place
that
a
bicycle
could
go
would
not
have
a
barrier
a
wall
or
whatever.
R
You
wanted
to
hear,
and
some
of
that
we
just
talked
about,
which
is
what's
the
history
of
some
of
the
planning
efforts
that
have
happened
in
this
area,
and
how
can
we
build
on
those
efforts
as
this
as
this
group
and
as
the
public
engagement
around
this
project
moves
forward,
and
so
what
I'd
like
to
spend
have
a
spend?
A
couple
minutes
doing
is
think
about
some
of
the
existing
conditions.
Information
that
you
all
would
like
to
see
and
you
all
would
like
to
get
we.
R
As
you
all
know,
we
we
had
conversations
between
meetings
with
as
many
of
you
as
we
could
and
will
follow
up
with
everyone,
especially
those
who
we
haven't
spoken
with,
but
it
came
up
a
lot
that
that
there's
there's
data
and
information
you
may
want
that
would
help
you
and
help.
You
understand
not
only
what's
going
on
now,
but
begin
to
think
about
both
the
opportunities
that
are
going
that
exists
here,
as
well
as
potential
impacts
to
be
able
to
mitigate
those
impacts.
R
The
park
and
open
space
network-
including,
what's
here
now
and
what
is
potentially
planned
in
the
future
and
then
of
course,
transit
and
transportation.
We
are
gonna,
come
back
at
the
next
meeting
and
talk
a
bit
more
about
about
transit
and
transportation,
including
some
of
the
big
investments
that
are
happening
and
planned
for
the
Durham
station
area.
R
So
that's
a
really
a
preliminary,
a
preliminary
list
of
buckets
with
some
of
the
things
we've
heard
already,
but
what
I'd
like
to
do
now
is
maybe
just
have
us,
take
a
few
minutes
and
brainstorm
and
you
all
can
throw
out
some
types
of
information
that
you
would
be
interested
in.
We
can
maybe
talk
about
this,
not
only
topically
as
buckets
but
I.
Think
one
thing
that
might
come
up
is
is
analysis
and
potential.
R
R
What's
that
background,
that
existing
conditions,
information
that
you
think
you
might
need
or
want
to
see
at
this
point
and
we'll
do
our
best
to
get
as
much
as
we
can
to
you
in
a
shorter
period
of
time
as
we
can
so
we've
had
if
either
ideas
or
if
you
have
questions
about
how
about
this
information-
and
a
lot
of
this,
is
really
for
you
all
as
a
group
to
have
in
your
pockets
to
think
about.
What's
here,
rather
than
for
us
to
sort
of
lead
and
direct
okay,
yes,
John,
we.
Q
Don't
have
looking
at
schools
a
school
impact,
the
number
of
kids
in
the
school?
What's
what's
a
traffic
pattern
around
schools
level
of
school
support?
That's
there.
Are
there
literacy
programs,
you
know
snap
recipients,
you
know
lets
us
know
about
the
level
of
poverty.
You
know
hot
school
lunches,
okay,.
R
R
D
R
R
Q
B
B
D
So,
with
with
the
land
use
piece
really
interested
in
the
future
as
it
relates
to
height
that
may
have
been
discussed
a
lot
before,
but
just
really
interested
in
what
opportunities
there
are
for
that,
and
also
you
know,
understanding,
maybe
just
a
little
bit
more
of
what
we
know
that
the
the
Google
Sites
only
going
to
be
a
piece
of
this,
but
understanding
more
of
the
240
acres.
What's
in
there
there's
the
the
arena,
there's
some
part
arena
parking.
How
does
that
work?
R
J
Q
B
G
The
apartment
ordinance,
so
rent-controlled
apartments
could
be
at
risk
of
being
Ellis
acted,
taking
off
them
the
market
and
so
I
think
it'd
be
helpful
to
have
an
inventory
of
that,
and
then
also
you
know,
MTC's
done
some
good
analysis
of
looking
at
what
the
impact
looks
like
in
terms
of
traffic
for
each
additional
job
at
it.
So
I
think
it's
it's.
G
It's
a
useful
analysis
to
have
that
as
well,
and
you
know
certainly
not
asking
you
guys
to
do
like
a
full
implant
analysis,
but
you
know:
there's
there's
some
good
literature
out
there
about
tech
growth,
in
particular
what
kind
of
jobs
that
that
leads
to
in
the
local
economy.
You
know
the
growth
of
service,
jobs
and
I
think
there's
there's
some
good
analysis
connecting
that
to
what
happens
with
displacement
and
and
the
traffic
needs
and
all
the
rest
of
it.
So
there's
a
good
secondary
literature
I
mean.
R
L
L
I
think
as
well
the
polity
existing
policy
context,
for
example,
my
recollection,
is
that,
after
the
adoption
of
the
station
area
plan,
there
was
some
work
that
was
that
was
going
to
proceed
around
some
of
these
TDM
TMA
sorts
of
activities
with
sa
p.
I'd
love
to
know
how
far
that
conversation
has
gotten.
Since
that
seemed
like
particularly
opportune
to
through
this
process,
you.
L
R
L
Oh
and
I
think
in
terms
of
existing
policy
context
it'd,
be
helpful
to
know
what
some
of
the
existing
policy
goals
and
priorities
are
for
the
urban
villages,
because
the
city
has
made
some
important
goals
around
what
they're
looking
for
for
urban
villages
that
could
be
applicable
here
in
terms
of
mix
of
homes
and
jobs,
affordability,
goals
for
those
areas,
vibrancy
public
amenity,
sorts
of
goals
that
good.
That
might
be
a
helpful
contactor.
B
B
M
M
R
R
R
K
I'm
being
extremely
naive,
but
I
would
like
to
know
what
Google
would
envision
as
the
ideal
campus
for
them
and
maybe
get
some
preliminary
design
drawings
so
that
we
could
kind
of
get
our
head
around
where
they're
at
and
and
see
how
we
can
integrate
their
ideas
into
what
we
need
as
neighborhoods,
and
you
know,
businesses
and
that
sort
of
thing.
So
you
know
I'd
like
to
kind
of
pick
their
brain
on
on
what
they
see
as
the
ideal
thing,
which
is
gonna,
be
different,
probably
than
what
a
lot
of
us
here
think.
K
F
So
we
looked
at
a
lot
of
things
in
terms
of
creating
parks.
It's
at
our
open
spaces
in
the
good
neighbor
committee,
but
we
were
doing
it
at
a
much
less
dense
area
with
a
lot
fewer
residents
being
moved
in
I'm
concerned
about.
We
probably
need
a
presentation
on
how
we
can
create
the
open
space
for
these
new
intensified
residents,
because,
frankly,
the
cost
of
the
land
has
now
skyrocketed.
F
R
Right
so
let's
this
is
really
helpful.
Let's
move
on
to
our
next
section.
What
what
we
heard
is
a
variety
of
things.
Some
is
existing
data
that
you
need.
Some
is
analysis
that
you
want
and
then
somes
best
practices
suffice
to
say,
there's
a
lot
of
information
here,
probably
not
all
of
it
by
the
next
time,
but
we
will
definitely
try
and
get
some
information
out
if
you
feel
that
you
know
of
or
or
your
organization
has
developed
some
of
this
data
and
information
that
you
want
to
share.
B
R
B
R
It
is,
it
is
not.
This
is.
This
is
very
preliminary,
mostly
background
and
I
think
we
will
get
into
we
absolutely
will
get
into
later.
This
is
the
Segway.
Thank
you
that
we
will
get
into
what
types
of
analysis
you
know
what
we're
looking
at.
What
Google
is
gonna,
be
thinking
about
your
ideas,
types
of
analysis
that
you
want
to
see
so
will
absolutely
get
into
that.
R
So
one
is
to
clarify
community
interests,
aspirations
and
concerns.
You
all
know
a
lot
about.
What's
going
on
in
the
community
collectively
and
to
really
clarify
that
information
and
feed
that
into
the
process
is
part
of
your
role
here.
The
second
is
to
help
identify
potential
options
and
solutions
relative
to
the
project,
the
Google
projects
coming
forward.
The
third
is
to
serve
as
a
sounding
board
for
development
concepts.
R
The
fourth
is
to
help
ensure
that
diverse
perspectives
are
included
in
the
decision-making
process,
not
just
the
folks
here,
but
really
beyond
those
here
that
you
all
are
representing
more
than
than
just
yourselves
and
then
the
fourth
is
to
assist
in
project
understanding
and
engagement.
Okay,
we
talked
about
that
before
now,
digging
a
little
bit
deeper.
R
There
are
some
key
questions
that
the
team
has
developed,
that
we
think
we
need
help
with
during
this
process.
The
first
is:
what
would
you
like
to
see
in
the
Google
development
itself
and
in
the
Deardon
station
area
now
clearly
were
we
and
the
city
and
Google
are
gonna,
have
to
present
some
of
that
information
on
what
they
are
planning?
It's
you
know,
there's
nothing
really
at
this
point,
but
it's
going
to
be
evolving
and
and
an
iterative
process.
R
The
second
is:
what
community
benefits
would
you
like
the
Google
project
to
consider-
and
this
is
I-
think
one
that
that
we've
talked
about
quite
a
bit
even
just
at
the
beginning
of
this
concept
of
there's
development
and
the
community
should
have
benefits
from
the
development.
That's
happening
that
those
benefits
can
take
a
whole
wide
variety
of
forms,
and
what
we
want
to
hear
is
what
are?
What
are
the
benefits?
You
all
think
that
should
be
included
the
community
benefits
very
broadly
that
should
be
included
in
the
Google
project.
R
What's
the
relative
importance
of
one
compared
to
the
other,
how
do
you
value
different
benefits
and
it's
really
a
trade-off
exercise,
and
so
there's
no
answer,
but
we
we
do
want
to
get
in
input
from
all
of
you
on
the
relative
importance
of
these
decisions
that
are
being
made
now,
of
course,
there
are
not
only
is
this
a
tremendous
opportunity
that
many
of
you
have
spoken
about,
but
there
are
also
challenges
with
what's
happening
here.
There
are
concerns.
There's
concerns
about
traffic.
There's
concerns
about
about
jobs.
R
There's
concerns
about
gentrification
that
you
all
have
mentioned
already,
and
so
what
are
the
key
challenges
or
issues
that
you
think
need
to
be
addressed
in
the
area
and
as
the
dirt
on
station
develops,
and
then
what
are
the
potential
models,
solutions
or
options
that
should
be
considered?
We
certainly
can
present
some
of
those
options,
but
you
all
know
some
have
ideas
as
well
and
we
really
want
that.
We
want
it
to
be
a
dialogue.
Ok,
so
that's
kind
of
digging
deeper
into
some
of
the
questions.
R
So
what
are
we
gonna
end
up
with
here
and
you
know
granted.
This
is
you
know,
still
iterative,
it's
still
something
that
that's
being
developed,
but
we
expect
that
that
from
the
the
saag
process
there
is
going
to
be
a
report
that
documents
the
conversations
in
the
work
and
the
and
the
direction
and
the
ideas
that
you
all
have
given.
So
we
expect
that
there'll
be
a
report
that
has
an
overview
of
the
process.
R
We
expect
that
there
will
be
input
from
all
of
you
on
aspirations
and
preferences
for
the
project,
and
we
expect
to
organize
this
in
some
way
by
topic.
This
is
a
really
preliminary
first
stab
at
the
at
some
of
the
topics
and
the
subtopics,
but,
for
example,
land
use
and
design.
How
do
you
create
a
great
place?
What's
that
mix
abuses?
How
are
those
uses
organized?
R
What's
the
intensity
of
development,
the
design
character,
the
you
know,
aspirations
and
preferences
for
that
would
go
under
that
topic,
housing
and
displacement,
affordability,
requirements
right
of
return,
displacement
benefits,
recommend
recommendations,
aspirations
for
this
as
well
parks
and
public
spaces.
The
types
of
public
spaces,
design
ideas,
how
they
integrate
together:
transportation,
bicycle
pedestrian
network
ideas,
transportation,
improvements,
transit
traffic
mitigation
ideas,
sustainability
targets,
utilities,
different
building
design.
R
You
know
we
heard
at
the
last
meeting
about
bird
safe
design,
so
that's
an
aspiration
that
could
come
up
through
this
jobs,
economic
development
and
education,
including
the
job
mix,
job
training,
educational
programs
etc.
So,
clearly,
this
is
information
that
there's
going
to
be
a
back
and
forth
here
where
we're
gonna
need
to
be
feeding
you.
R
Some
information
of
things
that
we
know
and
you
all
need
to
be
giving
your
aspirations
that
you
know
feedback
as
well,
and
then
we
expect
that
the
what's
happening
here
and
we'll
talk
about
this
a
little
bit
more
in
a
minute
is
one
of
multiple
phases
that
are
happening.
You
know
on
into
the
future,
and
so
what
we
do
want
to
get
also
feedback
on
is
what
should
the
ongoing
community
engagement
process
be
to
make
sure
that?
R
R
What
that
engagement
process
should
be
to
make
sure
that
the
community
is
continues
to
be
engaged
in
the
process
for
decision
making,
so
the
sog
and
other
community
input
is
going
to
be
shared
with
the
development
team,
which
is
city
development
team,
which
is
really
city
staff
and
they
are
going
to
be
making
ultimately
be
making
recommendations
to
Google
and
then,
ultimately,
this
the
decider
is
the
City
Council.
So
this
group
is
is
providing
aspirations
and
ideas,
and
this
is
one
of
multiple
ways
that
input
is
going
to
be
received
in
this
process.
R
We're
gonna
talk
later
about
workshops,
stakeholder
meetings,
focus
groups,
so
it's
gonna
be
a
whole
engagement
process.
That's
gonna
be
going
on
starting
relatively
soon
in
parallel
to
this,
so
this
is
going
to
be
one
input
into
the
process,
but
there's
going
to
be
others
as
well,
and
the
the
input
that's
received
is
is
not
going
to
be
essentially
winner-take-all,
where
there
there's
gonna,
be
a
vote
with
the
majority
vote
rules
and
all
other
opinions
kind
of
get
put
by
the
wayside.
That
is
not
the
way
it's
going
to
happen.
R
There
may
be
voting
on
general
direction,
but
what
we
want
to
do
is
make
sure
that
that
the
report
that
comes
out
of
this
group
is
is
true
to
the
diversity
of
thoughts
and
ideas
that
the
group
has
clearly
moving
towards.
Consensus
is
what
we
want
to
do,
but
we
also
recognize
there's
38
of
you.
You
have
tons
of
ideas
and
we
don't
want
to
leave
any
of
the
ideas
out.
So
even
if
there's
a
you
know
minority
ideas
about
something,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
represented
in
the
process.
R
K
R
Agree
alright,
this,
if
you
can
read
it
is
I
I.
Honestly,
we
will
get
this
out
to
you
in
a
more
legible
format.
Really
sorry
yeah,
I'm,
gonna,
I'm
gonna
walk
over
here,
so
I
can
actually
see
this
as
well.
So
we
we've
organized
our
work
essentially
into
and
the
your
work
into
essentially
three
phases.
The
first
phase
is
background,
exploring
visioning
generating
ideas.
R
The
second
phase
is
really
diving
deeper
into
some
of
the
topics,
the
topic
areas
in
in
more
detail
to
develop
the
aspirations
and
ideas
for
you
all
and
then
the
third
phase
is
drafting
the
report
content
and
making
sure
that
we're
representing
everyone's
ideas
accurately
in
their
the
we
are,
we've
done
our
orientation
meeting,
our
our
first
meeting
is
tonight.
Let
me
just
kind
of
talk
quickly,
just
about
the
flow
from
here
in
just
a
little
bit
more
detail.
R
So
the
meeting
after
this
is
really
gonna
be
about
the
vision
overall
vision
and
challenges
we
are
gonna,
have
a
you,
give
you
some
more
existing
conditions,
information.
Some
of
the
information
you
wanted
to
hear
we're
gonna
have
Google
give
a
brief
overview
on
sort
of
their
their
aspirations.
I.
Guess
it's
not
a
plan,
but
really
just
I'm
going
to
mess
this
up.
So
I'm
going
to
look
at
my
notes
here.
It
is
in
inspiration
and
design
principles,
so
big
picture.
So
what
are
the
what's?
What's
inspiring
Google
with
this?
R
R
R
You
know
give
give
the
microphone
up
to
you
guys
and
let
you
state
positions,
state
ideas,
and
then
what
we
want
to
do
is
take
all
of
that
and
organize
it
in
a
way
topically,
so
that
we
see
sort
of
the
full
body
of
what
everyone
is
thinking
from
there.
We
are
gonna
talk,
we're
gonna,
get
another,
have
another
presentation
by
Google
on
their
preliminary
design
concepts.
So
they'll
have
a
little
bit
of
time
based
on
everything
that
you've
heard
so
far
and
then
and
I'll
talk
about
this
in
a
second.
R
We
are
gonna,
have
a
series
of
subcommittees
and
those
subcommittees
are
gonna,
be
on
different
topics.
They're
gonna
be
working
sort
of
in
parallel
to
this,
and
then
they're
they're
gonna
be
coming
back
in
and
feeding
ideas
to
the
group
and
you'll
be
discussing
those
with
a
variety
of
different
topics.
That's
the
next
four
meetings
and
then
we
get
into
the
last
two,
which
is
the
report.
So
there's
a
lot
to
do.
There's
a
lot
of
information.
We
know
that
and
we're
trying
to
structure
this.
R
R
The
meetings
will
occur
between
the
regular
saag
meetings,
their
volunteer
groups.
You
don't
want
to
do
any
of
them.
You
don't
have
to
do
any
of
them.
The
meetings
would
be
open
to
the
public
to
listen,
it's.
It
would
be
as
like
a
subcommittee
so
be
considered.
The
part
of
the
Brown
Act,
and
essentially
this
is
the
opportunity
for
you
all
to
work
in
smaller
groups
to
dive
deeper
with
the
help
of
of
the
city
into
specific
topics.
It's
a
proposed
idea.
R
You
know
we
definitely
want
some
feedback
on
on
your
ideas
about
this
on
whether
you
think
this
direction
makes
sense.
Okay,
so
with
that
that
was,
you
know,
I
think,
last
time
you
felt
like
it
wasn't
enough
information
and
I,
don't
know.
Maybe
this
time
you
feel
like
it's
too
much
information
so
opening
it
up
just
to
sort
of
some
comments,
you
can
start
putting
your
cards
vertically.
Here
is
the
role
clearer
to
you
now
about
how
you're
sort
of
operating
how
you're
operating
together
do
the
solution
groups
make
sense
to
you?
R
Are
they
a
good
way
of
exploring
topics
in
more
detail
and
bringing
information
back,
and
if
not,
what
do
you
recommend
and
then
does
it
make
sense
about
the
does
the
flow
of
meetings
make
sense
and
are
there
any
major
topics
that
you
see
that
are
missing
here?
We
can
certainly
add
those
in
okay.
We'll
give
you
a
second
to
ponder
turn
your
cards
vertically.
Yes,.
R
And
let
me
just
also
say
that
you
know,
as
with
as
with
any
process
you
you
start
on
the
process,
and
we
can
make
course
changes.
So
if
we
feel
like
we're
starting
it
works,
but
then
we
decide
to
add
or
modify.
You
know,
that's
always
on
the
table,
so
we
don't
have
to
you
know.
We
should
definitely
start
on
a
course,
but
but
we
can
also
change
courses
later
all
right.
Last
time,
I
started
this
way,
this
time,
I'm
starting
this
way,
Matthew
hi.
G
L
R
R
You
know
I-I-I,
will
I'm
gonna
try
answering
this,
I'm
like
so
you
know,
I
think
it's
a
I
I
think
it's
a
it
is.
It
is
a
challenge
because
we
don't
know
at
this
point
the
direction
that
the
whole
conversation
is
going
to
go.
You
know,
I
would
expect
that
there
it
would
be
organized
essentially
topically
and
what
we
would
try
to
do
is
identify
in
as
much
detail
as
we
can
the
aspirations
and
ideas
that
the
group
has
come
up
with.
We
some
of
it.
May
you
know
we
want
it
to
be
directional.
R
We
don't
want
it
to
be
just
a
laundry
list
of
aspiration
that
that
you
can't
do
so.
We
definitely
need
to
spend
some
time
thinking
about
how
to
prioritize,
but
but
I
would
I
would
see
it
as
a
series
of
of
what
is
the
topic
they,
that
is,
you
know,
pick
a
topic.
What
is
the
issue
or
the
concept
that
you're
interested
in
and
then
how
are?
What
are
the
different
approaches
that
the
project
could
take
now?
R
I
think
that,
because
we
also
are
going
to
have
a
very
specific
project
in
front
of
us,
that
we're
gonna
be
able
to
react
to
they're
gonna
be
specifics
about
in
reaction
to
that
project
for
those
specific
topics.
So
it's
it's
I.
You
know
the
the
real
answer
to
question
is
I.
Don't
have
a
here's,
a
perfect
example
and
we
know
exactly
what
its
gonna
look
like.
So
I
think
there
will
be
some
back-and-forth
but
I'm
sort
of
we're
sort
of
getting
a
clearer
idea
of
a
list
of
recommendations.
S
First
of
all,
you
asked
if
this
was
helpful.
It
is
a
lot
of
information,
but
it's
starting
to
shape
into
something
that
looks
a
little
bit
more
like
expectations
of
the
group.
So
thank
you
for
that.
When
Nancy
was
speaking
earlier,
you
made
some
reference
to
I.
Forget
your
words
exactly,
but
the
group
of
us
will
be
responsible
for
developing
the
community
benefit
agreement,
something
along
those
lines.
H
Just
to
clarify
so
in
2018,
the
work
of
this
group
will
be
very
important
in
providing
input
to
the
memorandum
of
understanding
that
the
City
Council
will
consider
toward
the
end
of
2018.
It
will
not
be
the
only
input
because,
of
course,
city
departments
will
have
input.
Others
will
have
input,
but
if
I
have
to
say
the
reason
we
want
your
answers
to
those
five
questions
is
so
that
we
can
have
that
as
we
develop
this
MOU
partnership
agreement
with
Google
and.
R
I
think
the
things
we're
going
to
talk
about
in
the
next
section
is
that-
and
we
mentioned
before
as
after
the
MOU
there's
a
whole
series
of
other
steps
getting
progressively
more
detailed.
So
the
MOU
you
know,
which
is
2018
is
at
the
higher
level.
It's
it
the
more
aspirational
level
and
then
we'll
be
diving
into
more
and
more
detail,
because.
S
Community
Benefit
agreements
obviously
have
much
more
legal
undertones
and
things
like
that,
and
then
one
last
question:
if
I
may
I
love
the
idea
of
the
solution
groups
just
to
go
deeper,
synthesizing
information
just
from
those
groups
is
going
to
be
a
fair
bit
of
administrative,
require
some
administrative
support.
I'm
assuming
we
can
get
some
of
that
from
somewhere
yeah.
Q
Part
of
the
work
we
do
at
pact
is
doing
a
lot
of
kind
of
getting
into
the
neighbors
hearing
from
voices
that
are
marginalized
and
on
the
periphery
and
a
lot
of
those
concerns
that
bring
up
are
just
like.
You
know,
daily
concerns
that
affect
people
in
daily
life
and
those
are
on
the
margins.
Where
are
the
ones
to
hit?
Q
You
know
the
most
and
so
to
me,
it
seems
like
we
might
want
to
think
about
impact
some
kind
of
an
impact
report
or
some
kind
of
how
our
gonna
measure
the
impact
on
the
most
vulnerable.
The
poor
I
think,
that's
to
me,
I
mean
I,
that's
it
kind
of
weaves
through
a
lot
of
those
pieces.
But,
like
you
know,
I
can't
beat
every
one
of
those
meetings,
but
does
it
need
to
be
a
separate
piece
or
or
do
we
need
to
kind
of
have
that
kind
of
question
responded
to
in
each
of
those
groups?
Q
I'm
not
sure
it's
a
process
question,
but
it's
also
a
Content
question
so
that
that
voice
and
that
specific
piece
is
somehow
responded
to
and
and
and
and
again
just
want
to
just
kind
of
underscore.
The
other
piece
is
missing
from
the
potential
topics
is:
is
just
education?
You
know
public
education.
What
is
that
you
know?
How
is
it
going
to
impact
existing
schools?
I
mean
we
already
see
a
huge
drop
and
students
coming
because
of
the
high
price
of
housing.
There's
all
these
things
are
intertwined,
but
there
is
a
piece
about
public
education.
A
Just
really
quickly
at
Matt
sort
of
touched
on
it,
but
I
don't
want
anyone
on
the
group
to
think
that
the
list
in
front
of
you,
land-use
housing,
is
a
buy
by
any
stretch,
the
buckets
that
we're
putting
you
in
right
now
in
the
next
meeting,
the
meeting
after
you're
gonna
go
through
an
exercise
to
create
those
buckets.
This
is
just
kind
of
our
take
on
what
we
think
it's
gonna
be
based
off
of
the
last
meeting.
A
R
Just
very
quickly,
you
know
one
thing
John
that
you
brought
up,
which
sort
of
goes
back
to
Matt's
question,
which
is
one
of
the
the
outcomes
of
this,
could
be
some
recommendations
about
things
for
further
study
that
you
want
to
look
at,
because
we're
not
gonna
be
able
to
cover
everything
at
this
point
and
we're
not
gonna
have
all
of
the
detail,
because
we're
only
getting
to
the
MOU
phase.
So
a
list
of
you
know
we
want
a
series
of
studies
on
different
topics.
Moving
forward,
I
think
could
be
helpful
as
well
all
right,
Kathy.
B
Quality
of
life
issues
for
the
people
who
are
living
in
the
areas
around
Google
I
think
that
there's
a
lot
of
concern
for
populations
different
populations
in
general,
but
I
do
think
that
those
of
us
that
live
adjacent
or
within
the
footprint
have
some
have
some
concerns.
That
I
think
we
should
be
able
to
do
that.
We
should
be
able
to
discuss
and
think
of
solutions
for
okay.
C
Community
benefits
agreements
and
that
this
process,
though
you
know
this,
is
unique.
This
has
been
done
in
other
places
across
the
country,
thinking
about
even
locally
Oakland
army
base,
thinking
about
the
Facebook,
CBA
and
so
I
think
being
able
to
share
some
of
that
information
and
really
make
sure
that
we
all
understand
what
a
CBA
is,
how
it
works
and
what
it
could
look
like
for
us
here.
O
Charlie
Foss
San
Jose
State,
one
of
the
things
Google's
sitting
up
in
Mountain
View
today.
Can
we
get
input
from
the
city
of
Mountain
View
and
find
out?
What's
worked
up
there
for
them?
What
would
they
like
to
do
if
they
could
redo
some
of
the
time?
You'll
roll
back
the
clock?
What
advice
and
counsel
can
they
give
us
as
we
craft
this
now?
It
kind
of
grew
organically
up
there
and
we're
starting
from
zero,
but
I
think
there's
some
things.
R
Q
Good
evening,
any
chunk
from
the
cylinder
by
organization
well
think,
first
of
all,
thank
you
so
much
for
defining
the
purpose.
Then
role
at
the
SOG.
It's
clear
to
me
that
the
solution
groups
will
be
doing
the
heavy
lifting
in
terms
of
what
is
going
to
be
the
achievable
final
product
here
through
a
strong
and
robust
partnership
with
Google
I
have
I
understand
that
many
of
the
solution
groups
will
be
driven
by
what
Google's,
design
and
vision
for
what
the
deer
down
station
will.
Q
Look
like,
but
I
have
question
regarding
the
jobs,
economic
development,
education
piece,
the
city
staff
have
any
idea
of
what
industry
clusters
will
be
focused
on
in
terms
of
the
job,
training
and
educational
programs,
primarily
is
a
focus
on
tech
or
their
specific
industry.
Clusters
that
you
are
focused
on
am
trying
to
get
understanding
to
figure
out
how
we
can
further
engage
businesses
in
this
continued
development
and.
R
And
just
I
want
to
just
run
quickly
to
one
of
the
things
you
said,
which
is
that
you
know
Google
my
understanding
of
how
this
is
working,
and
you
know
staff,
please
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
here,
you
know,
Google
is
going
to
be
developing
their
plans
as
this
group
is
meeting,
so
it
really
will
be
an
as
they
are
shaping
their
ideas
to
help
shape
what
they
are
thinking,
and
so
the
input
that
you
all
are
giving
and
the
ideas
are
going
to
go
into
what
they
are,
what
they
are
thinking
as
well,
so
they'll
be
listening
and
hearing.
R
D
R
G
R
R
Your
wife
was
sending
out
these
thoughts
because
we
really
don't
want
ever
anyone
on
more
than
to
just
yeah
a
limited,
a
limited
number
for
everyone,
so
you
will
have
to
sort
of
pick
and
choose
which
ones
you
want
they're
all
open
to
the
public's.
You
can
also
go
to
them
as
well,
and
then
you
know
how
actually
they're
gonna
work
when
any
one
of
those
subtopics
you
could
spend
months
and
months
and
months
on
is
certainly
a
challenge
and
I
think
we're
gonna
have
to
we're.
R
F
Keep
hearing
Google
and
this
group
was
created
by
the
council
to
look
at
not
just
the
40
acres
of
Google
land,
but
also
the
entire
248
acres
in
this
area.
So
the
question
I
have
is
this:
this
list
works
fine
for
Google.
The
the
timeline
would
work
fine
for
an
MOU
for
Google,
but
I
speed
rail,
that's
coming
through
they're,
going
to
make
changes
to
Deere
down
station
that
will
be
outside
that
September
of
timeline
and
how
will
we
make
sure
that
whatever
other
projects
are
created
after
this?
F
R
R
Yeah
I
think
we're
gonna
come
on
to
the
next
slide
is
I.
Think
we
are,
we
are
we
do
have.
We
want
to
talk
some
about
about
relationships
here,
so
I
mean
to
sort
of
go.
Oh
Kim,
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna.
This
is
actually
good
a
good
transition
for
Kim
to
talk
about
how
what
we're
doing
now
and
then
how
that
can
pivot
into
other
work.
H
Thank
you.
So
what
I
realized
was
after
I
made
this
key
point
at
the
start
of
the
last
meeting,
I
realized
there
was
a
lot
of
kind
of
real-estate
jargon
and
terms
that
were
in
here
and
I.
Think
it's
really
important
to
go
over
it
again,
because,
honestly,
all
this
jargon
in
terms
were
totally
new
to
me
at
one
point
and
I.
We
won't
want
everybody
to
understand
this
in
multi-step
multi-year
process
and
to
be
really
clear
about
what
the
process
is.
So
it
put
together.
H
That's
the
normal
project
review
process,
the
the
lucky
part
that
we
have
is
we
have
now
this
year
to
sort
of
be
at
the
concept
and
vision
level
and
with
the
community
sort
of
get
to
that
level
where
there
will
be
hopefully
a
project.
So
I
wanted
to
just
hit
on
a
few
of
these
terms
here.
So
the
first
one
is
ena
that
I
mentioned
last
time:
exclusive
negotiation
agreement,
and
so
this
was
approved
by
the
City
Council
last
June
20th,
and
it's
basically
an
agreement
that
says
kind
of
it's
kind
of
like
dating
right.
H
It
says
we're
gonna
date
kind
of
exclusively
for
a
while
and
not
really
see
anybody
else
and
see
if
this
is
going
someplace
or
not
right.
So
we
have
this
period
now
and
I've
dated
a
lot.
Cuz
I
got
married
later
in
life,
so
I
know
about
how
this
works
right.
You
got
your
eyes
on
somebody.
You
have
a
few
conversations.
You
go
out
for
a
bit
so
we're
in
this
period.
H
Now
the
initial
period
was
for
a
year
and
we
can
extend
it
for
another
year
and
we
can
have
lots
of
conversations
to
check
each
other
out
and
see
if
we
want
to
start
making
more
firm
commitment.
So
that's
what
an
exclusive
negotiations
agreement
is
all
about.
So
the
second
kind
of
agreement
we
have
and
I
mentioned
this
last
time-
is
a
compensation
agreement,
and
that
sounds
great
because
everybody
wants
compensation,
but
who
really
wants
compensation?
H
Are
the
taxing
entities
that,
while
redevelopment
was
in
place,
were
not
getting
incremental
property
tax
so
like
the
county
and
the
Water
District
and
the
San
Jose
Unified,
School
District?
So
under
California
law,
we
have
an
approved
plan
to
sell
properties
that
were
owned
by
the
former
Redevelopment
Agency,
and
these
five
properties,
including
them
called
the
ballpark
properties.
They
were
always
referred
to
as
the
ballpark
properties,
our
Redevelopment
Agency
properties
and
under
the
approved
plan.
They
were
designated
for
future
development
and
we
were
required
to
determine
the
fair
market
value
under
current
zoning
and
everything.
H
Just
as
of
this
point
in
time,
and
then,
if
we
agree
on
the
fair
market
value
to
sell
those
properties
and
give
the
money
to
all
the
taxing
entities
that
have
been
been
waiting
for
it,
so
that
compensation
agreement
is
in
the
process.
Now
of
going
to
the
twelve
taxing
entities.
It's
already
been
approved
by
the
city
by
the
county
by
the
successor
agency
oversight
board,
and
so
once
that
document
is
signed
off,
hopefully
by
June.
H
Those
properties
then
come
to
the
city,
and
the
city
has
to
sell
them
by
the
end
of
this
year
by
December
31st.
That's
what
the
compensation
agreement
says
and
we
pushed
it
to
December
31st,
because
we
wanted
enough
time
for
this
process
and
for
it
for
it
not
to
be
rushed.
So
that's
the
agreement
there.
So
what
we're
working
toward
and
where
your
input
is
absolutely
critical,
is,
by
the
end
of
the
year
may
by
November
or
December
that
we
would
have
to
greement
s--.
H
That
would
go
to
council
for
review
and
hopefully
approval
and
they
would
go
together.
It's
a
Memorandum
of
Understanding
agreement
and
the
purchase
and
sale
agreement.
So
let
me
start
with
the
purchase
and
sale
agreement
because
that's
probably
the
obvious
one,
the
purchase
and
sale
agreement
basically
just
says.
We
agree
to
sell
these
properties
to
Google
at
these
price.
This
price-
and
these
terms-
and
we
anticipate
it-
would
be
those
five
successor
agency
properties
and
the
price
has
been
determined
for
those
plus
likely
to
other
city
of
San
Jose
properties.
H
So
the
purchase
and
sale
agreement
would
go
forward
and
that
gives
that
gives
us.
The
revenue
and
it
gives
Google
the
assurance
that
they're
going
to
own
enough
of
these
key
properties
to
have
a
quality
master
plan
development,
so
we're
going
to
want
to
have
an
MoU
that
goes
with
that
purchase
and
sale
agreement
and
what
the
MOU
is
is.
It
is
a
statement
of
intent
and
it
outlines
what
the
intentions
are
of
both
parties
at
the
20,000
level.
So
if
we
do
this
right,
it
says
this
is
our
shared
vision
of
what
this
is.
H
These
are
our
goals.
These
are
our
expectations
of
each
other,
including
for
what
this
development
is
going
to
be
at
the
concept
level
and
for
what
the
community
benefits
are
going
to
be
associated
with
the
development.
So
that's
that's
the
MOU
and
the
purchase
and
sale
agreement
and
they'll
go
forward
together.
H
Dear
Don
Station
area
plan
I
want
to
mention
also
we
are
studying
the
height
limitations
over
the
downtown
in
the
Deardon
area,
and
so
we
will
know
hopefully
sometime
this
year,
if
we're
going
to
be
able
to
raise
Heights
in
any
particular
locations,
because
that'll
be
important,
and
so
what
we're
all
working
toward
is
the
development
agreement.
Now
the
development
agreement
is
sort
of
like
that's
the
deal
that
is
very
detailed,
very
specific
agreement.
H
It's
sort
of,
like
the
marriage
license
with
a
really
serious
prenup
attached
to
where
you
sort
of
thought
all
the
different
things.
So
you
can
see
in
the
description
here.
I
mean
this
is
a
contract.
The
development
agreement
will
say
specifically
what
the
deville
builder
intends
to
build.
What
they're
allowed
to
build
over
what
timeframe,
and
it
will
outline
very
specifically
the
community
benefits
that
will
be
required
in
the
project
so,
and
hopefully
the
you
know
be
to
two
years
into
this-
that
then
we
will
have
the
specific
deal.
H
H
We
want
to
share
kind
of
what
we're
thinking
and
learn
what
you're
thinking,
whether
it's
a
real
estate
project
or
a
company
that
might
want
to
demonstrate
a
technology
in
our
city
there's
a
period
there
where
we
sign
non-disclosure
agreements
so
so
of
us
involved
with
this.
Did
that,
but
the
minute
we
issued
that
memo
with
that
recommendation,
saying
we
recommend
an
exclusive
negotiation
agreement,
then
the
NDA
is
no
longer
in
place,
so
it
was
a
period
there
of
a
several
months
where
we
had
conversations
about.
Is
this
a?
H
H
Yeah,
so
any
materials
that
were
produced
are
subject
to
I
think
we
said
on
here,
so
we
have
shared
materials
when
they
requested
that
we
had,
but
what
the
product
of
that
was
really
the
the
exclusive
negotiations
agreement
itself,
so
that
is,
we
can
send
you
the
link
to
that.
So
the
memo
that
was
released
last
year
on
June
6
for
the
June
20th
council
meeting
had
the
draft
exclusive
negotiation
agreement
and
it
had
a
schedule
attached
to
that.
H
So,
under
under
sequa
I
mean
development
projects
are
required
to
mitigate
their
impacts,
so
the
community
benefits
could
include
some
of
those
things
that
are
above
and
beyond
city
requirements
or
legal
requirements.
The
community
benefits
in
this
process
are
expected
to
be
embodied
in
the
development
agreement
in
a
very,
very
specific
way.
So
when
we
get
to
the
MOU
and
the
community,
benefits
will
be
discussed
in
the
MOU,
but
then
once
we
know
more,
what
this
project
is
when
we
get
to
the
DA.
H
The
community
benefits
will
be
very
specific
in
the
DA
I
think
that's
important
point,
so
the
MOU
may
talk
about
how
we'll
determine
the
value
or
what
the
metrics
will
be,
but
we're
not
going
to
have
a
project
by
the
end
of
the
year.
Remember
once
we
know
what
the
project
will
be
then
we'll
have
we'll
have
several
years
of
talking
about
the
specifics
details
that
will
go
in
that
development
agreement
and
that
development
agreement.
H
The
kind
of
the
leverage,
if
you
will
is
this
all-
comes
together.
The
development
agreement,
the
environmental
document
and
the
land
use
entitlements
are
all
approved
at
the
same
time
and
then,
after
that,
you're
in
a
position
to
go
for
planning
permits
and
building
permits
and
actually
think
about
construction.
H
G
Purchase
and
sale
agreement
would
there
be
contingency?
Would
that
just
be
a
that's,
a
straight
sale
or
there's
contingencies
in
terms
of
contingencies
around
you
know
successfully
completing
the
environmental
review
of
the
planning
and
zoning
amendments
and
all
the
development
agreement
and
the
rest
of
it.
G
My
concern
is
just
that
you
know
we've
seen,
as
you
pointed
out
with
with
the
non-disclosure
agreements
in
our
enquiries,
trying
to
find
out
more
about
those
agreements
received
emails
that
were
pretty
explicit
about
Google
wanting
public
officials
in
meetings
about
planning
around
this
project
to
sign
non-disclosure
agreements
and
I.
Don't
have
the
direct
quote
in
front
of
me,
but
basically
because
they
didn't
want
the
public
process
to
know
about
some
specific
details
that
we're
gonna
be
shared
in
those
meetings.
G
All
that
to
say,
do
you
have
any
concerns,
given
our
lack
of
understanding
of
key
details
about
the
project
and
these
questions
about
what
informations
being
withheld
with
the
non-disclosure
agreements
and
supposedly
these
things
that
the
Google
staff
were
so
concerned
about
not
getting
out
into
the
public?
Do
we
want
to
be
making
a
agreements
about
sale
before
a
development
application
goes
through
because
that's
usually
not
the
norm?
I
understand
for
these
kinds
of
large-scale
projects.
H
So
I
have
no
idea
what
you're
talking
about
about
pits
and
those
sort
of
things,
but
the
reason
I
made.
My
point
is
that
the
minute
that
the
recommendation
was
made
and
all
of
the
public
way
that
we
disclosed
council
recommendations
last
June,
the
non-disclosure
a
period
was
just
for
the
period
before
then
when
confidentially
ILD
was
required
in
order
to
consider
even
whether
to
move
forward
with
the
recommendation
or
not.
H
Well,
I,
don't
know
what
you're
talking
about
so
we
can
take
that
offline,
because
I
honestly
have
no
idea
what
you're
talking
about.
So
we
can
happy
to
probably
fair
question.
So,
let's
tell
me
later
what
you're
talking
about
and
I
can
provide
an
answer,
but
I
have
no
idea
what
you're
talking
about
at
this
point
we
are
so
we
are
starting
to
negotiate
what
the
purchase
and
sale
agreement
will
be
right.
So
that
is
work
that
will
happen
between
over
the
next
six
months.
M
I
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
question.
The
long-term
nature
when
a
development
comes
into
play
is
usually
when
you're
not
talking
about
anything,
that's
near-term
and
in
this
situation,
we're
even
longer
than
most
times,
because
we
won't
have
the
transit
development
and
for
another
ten
years
right
and
we're
hoping
everything
sticks
to
that
timeframe.
So
that's
why
the
development
agreement
will
be
the
document
that
outlines
what
we
can
do
and
what
community
community
benefits
stay
there.
I
So
I
know
that
is
in
there's
all
kinds
of
different
ways
with
land-use
transaction,
every
single
one's
a
little
bit
different,
but
the
the
DA
will
be
a
tool-
that's
definitely
needed
by
Google
to
secure
long
term
vesting.
This
is
the
word
that
the
lawyers
talk
to
that.
They
know
that
they
have
a
certainty
about
what
they
can
develop.
What
uses
what
size
is
what?
What
is
the
promises
that
go?
What
are
the
promises?
They
go
back
and
forth.
I
I
H
H
H
Sure
cuz
I'm
gonna
we're
just
starting
now
to
discuss
the
MOU
and
because
your
input
is
going
to
be
useful,
you
know
are
completing,
will
lag
your
process
here.
It
will
typically
it's
things
like
here's,
our
shared
aspirations
and
our
vision,
values
and
principles.
Here
are
some
of
the
concepts
things
that
we
would
like
to
see
so
concepts
maybe
related
to
public
space
or
the
mix
of
uses
it
way
it
will.
It
will
definitely
discuss
community
benefits.
We
all
want
to
discuss
community
benefits.
H
You
know
at
this
level,
not
at
this
level,
but
you
will
discuss
community
benefits.
It
may
say
things
like
things
that
we
intend
to
keep
studying,
like
maybe
the
height
limitations
of
our
downtown.
It
will
preview
the
development
agreement
right,
so
it
will
say
in
the
development
agreement.
We
expect
to
be
talking
about
all
of
these
things
at
brasstacks.
H
It
will
talk
about
the
approaches
to
taxes,
fees
and
subsidies,
for
example.
So
if
a
key
principle
here
is
no
subsidies,
we
expect
development
to
pay
full
fees
and
taxes.
You
know
it'll
say
things
like
that.
Those
kinds,
there's
probably
you
know
maybe
10
or
12
topics.
This
kind
of
MMO
you
would
have
Google
will
have
expectations
of
us
right
when
they
submit
their
project
application.
H
We're
gonna
have
an
aspirational
schedule
where
they're
gonna
expect
us
to
be
able
to
review
and
approve,
and
us
not
to
take.
You
know,
20
years
on
their
project.
So
it's
our
expectations
of
Google,
but
this
is
a
two-way
document,
so
we'll
also
include
Google's
expectations
of
us
and
where
we
need
to
perform
it
well.
I
I
wanted
to
say
continued
expectations
for
community
engagement
and
what
that's
going
to
look
like
and
just
to
be
clear
because
it's
this
is
all
kind
of
personal.
H
At
the
end
of
the
day,
you
know
Nancy
and
I
are
but
two
or
two
of
the
key
people
that
will
be
having
these
discussions
with
Google
all
right.
So
that's
why
we're
here
and
we're
going
to
be
at
all
the
meetings
and
we're
listening
and
we're
gonna
help
translate
and
help
with
that
dialogue,
so
we're
the
ones
most
immediately
that
are
going
to
be
using
the
information.
H
L
A
So
one
of
our
last
items
for
tonight-
and
we
had
a
lot
of
great
conversation
at
the
the
orientation
kind
of
a
broader
community
engagement
strategy,
which
you
know
this
group
is
a
big
part
of
that,
but
the
other
activities
happening
outside
this
area.
So
for
us
you
know
we
want
to
kind
of
do
an
enhanced
level
of
engagement.
You
know
with
this
project,
but
I
will
say
you
know
I
do
think
San
Jose,
you
know
really
prides
itself
on.
A
You
know
good
civic
engagement
process
and
good
relationships
with
the
community
when
we
do
these
type
of
efforts
and
and
others.
So
you
know
our
goal
with
this-
is
we
have
a
very
diverse
community?
They
access,
City
Hall.
You
know
resources
in
a
variety
of
different
ways,
so
for
us
to
be
able
to
offer
different
points
of
access
and
input
into
this
process,
and
so
you
know
we
talked
about
some
of
these.
In
the
last
meeting
I
know,
Matthew
and
the
law
foundation
wrote
in
a
letter
with
several
suggestions
as
well.
A
So
we've
taken
this
into
account,
but
we're
gonna
be
offering
some
digital
tools
and
a
variety
of
different
meetings
to
have
input
into
this
process
and
the
goal
with
with
all
of
this
I'm
gonna
skip
the
sack
because
we
kind
of
talked
a
lot
about
the
solution
groups,
but
just
as
an
FYI,
we
will
be
doing
some
walking
tours.
People
really
wanted
to
get
on
the
ground,
see
things
so
they
can
start
having
kind
of
the
context.
A
So
we
will
be
offering
those
outside
the
Deardon
sj-o
org
website
is
gonna,
go
through
somewhat
of
a
transformation
in
the
next
several
days,
so
that
there's
other
areas
of
input,
there's
gonna
be
a
lot
more
information
up.
There
there's
been
some
limitations
on
our
side
with
our
city
website,
so
bear
with
us.
While
we
get
that
up,
but
that's
gonna
be
a
major
component
of
how
we
educate,
inform
and
access
different
communities
as
well
as
surveys,
whether
they
be
mobile
platforms.
Online
mobile
platforms,
you
know,
will
be
important
and
one
part
key.
A
Hopefully
co-sponsor
some
of
these
in
different
areas
of
the
community,
and
we
talked
about
location
time
of
day.
We're
gonna
be
very
sensitive
about
that,
as
well
as
some
pop-up
workshops
just
getting
into
areas
that
have
a
lot
of
people
talking
educating
about
this
project,
getting
feedback
and
then
towards
the
end
of
this
process,
a
community
forum,
an
open
house
where
we're
all
involved
working
with
the
community,
showing
what
we've
done
thus
far
getting
feedback-
and
this
slide
looks
a
lot
better
in
my
laptop,
it's
kind
of
fading
out
a
little
bit.
A
So
to
me,
this
slide
makes
perfect
sense.
I'll
be
honest.
This
is
a
Dave's,
very
innovative,
like
schedule,
scheduling
software
I
think
on
PowerPoint,
so
I
can
see
it
a
little
bit
better
here.
So
this
is
kind
of
just
a
process
diagram
right
now
of
how
we
think
things
are
gonna
work,
so
you
know
the
red
box.
This
is
where
we're
at
now,
and
so
you
can
see
kind
of
what
the
SAG
is
gonna.
A
Do
you
know
over
the
course
of
the
next
several
months
and
how
this
stakeholder
groups
or
those
solution
groups
you
know,
will
funnel
information
back
out.
You
know
I.
Think
I
was
glad
that
we
decided
to
have
the
good
neighbor
committee
conversation
before
the
solution
group,
because
you
kind
of
heard
you
know
that
we
talked
a
lot
about
concepts
and
we
didn't
get
into
a
lot
of
detail,
and
this
is
gonna
be
a
little
bit
different.
A
So
we
will
be
communicating
with
you
offline
between
now
and
then,
but
this
is
something
you
know,
as
we
talked
about
kind
of
this
group's
purpose,
ensuring
that
a
diverse
group
of
people
have
input
into
this
process.
What
kind
of
help
you
know
give
feedback
through
us
throughout
the
process
so
more
to
come
in
details,
but
this
is
kind
of
our
initial
framework
after
our
last
meeting
and
several
conversations
with
a
bunch
of
you
offline,
so
we're
gonna
do
public
comment
next,
one
thing
I
wanted
to
do
last
or
just
because
we
had
questions
about.
A
It,
though,
was
the
Brown
Act,
so
very
important,
and
this
is
tricky
so
I
apologize
that
you
know
we
weren't
able
to
provide
the
training
tonight.
But
we
had
a
question
about.
You
know:
can
we
put
out
information
one
of
the
things
about
Brown
Act.
That's
somewhat
ironic.
Is
the
state
legislature
put
it
into
place
so
that
decisions
are
made
transparently,
they're
made
in
public
and
it's
a
little
odd,
because
the
legislature
does
not
do
that
they
are
able
to
caucus
and
make
decisions
outside
that.
A
But
what
that
means
for
for
us,
even
though
we're
gonna
try
and
build
consensus-
and
we
you
know-
is
that
we
can't
make
decisions
outside
of
this
room
together.
So
there's
38
of
you,
half
of
that
is
19.
So
what
that
means
is
19
of
you
can't
get
together
and
decide.
Okay,
here's
what
we're
gonna
do
so
I
know
that's
a
bit
tricky.
That
also
means
you
know
for
our
city
council.
That
means
six
of
them
can't
get
together
and
have
a
conversation
on
a
specific
topic
outside
that
council
meeting.
A
They
also
can't
hit
a
reply
all
and
say
hey
by
the
way.
Here's
what
here's,
how
I'm
voting
on
Tuesday
so
I
think
when
we
build
out
the
website,
there's
gonna
be
a
portal.
There's
gonna
be
some
resources
and
a
newsroom
or
if
you
guys,
want
stuff
posted
as
FY
eyes
reports
we'll
be
able
to
do
that
for
you
as
staff,
so
we're
sharing
with
everyone,
but
I
would
say
between
now
and
you
know
April
9th
it
doesn't
mean
you
know
if
Harvey
runs
into
Jean.
You
guys
can't
talk
about.
F
A
There
is
a
term
serial
Brown
Act
training
and
makes
it
sound
like
it's
a
serial
murder
or
something
that
would
be
very
difficult
to
do
with
with
38
of
you,
it's
much
easier
to
do
with
a
smaller
group
body,
but
you
know
what
that
means
is.
If
you
know,
Harvey
decides
to
tell
Jean
well
here's
what
I'm
gonna
do
on
open
space
and
then
Jean
happened
to
talk
to
17
people,
but
then
Harvey
accidentally
told
five
people
that
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
there
was
more
than
half
so
that
would
probably
be
fairly
difficult.
A
A
A
B
A
A
very
good
question,
and
so
you
know
I
again
I
apologize
if
I'm
scaring
our
you
know
the
stage
were
at
I'm
fairly
certain.
It
would
be
impossible
for
us
to
have
a
Brown
Act
violation,
because
we
are
at
this
level.
We
don't
even
know
what
the
buckets
are
right.
So
you
know
one
of
you
telling
another
person
like
hey
urban
design
guidelines
are
really
important
to
me.
That's
not
gonna,
be
a
Brown,
Act
violation.
A
I
also
think
you
know
in
some
ways
you
know
this
group
being
brown
acted
is
a
bit
of
a
hurdle
for
staff.
I
will
suggest
because
it's
really
intended
for
voting
group,
like
majority
rule,
so
a
majority
can't
make
a
decision
outside
this
process,
and
you
know
it's
Dave
mentioned
and
what's
really
important
to
me
and
a
lot
of
you
that
we've
spoken
with
is
there's
not
going
to
be
that
situation
in
this
group.
B
S
A
That's
what
I
believe
is
going
to
happen,
and
so
that's
you
know
it
is
a
bit
tricky
for
us.
You
know
in
full
disclosure
too.
You
know
we
did
not
go
through
this
exercise,
I
believe
the
state
kind
of
updated
the
Brown
Act
between
now
and
the
good
neighbor
committee,
because
the
good
neighbor
committee
did
not
go
through
this
exercise.
But
again
you
are
correct.
We're
talking
about
inputs,
ideas,
but
again,
because
it
is
brown
acted.
There's
a
certain
level
of
kind
of
transparency
and
rules
that
we're
gonna
need
to.
You
know
collectively
work
around.
N
N
A
So
I
mean
you
were
representing
both
organizations
to
represent
both
organizations
and
I
would
say
based
off
of
what
you
just
told
me,
your
information
sharing
out
of
this
group
to
other
groups
of
what
happened.
So
it's
the
same
as
a
council
member
reporting
out
to
their
neighborhood
association.
So
that
is
not
a
worry
and
again
I
hate
to
raise
the
red
flag
without
the
training,
but
I
just
you
know,
want
to
make
sure
20
of
you
don't
have
to
get
get
together
without
me
and
talk
about
it
all
right,
Dave.
E
Okay,
thank
you
all
for
being
so
patient
members
of
the
public.
It's
now
your
opportunity
to
get
up
and
provide
your
input.
I
have
a
few
names
here.
We
have
about
six
or
seven
cards,
so
we
do
have
a
timer
up
there
for
two
minutes,
but
we'll
see
how
this
goes
and
actually
we'll
probably
get
out
of
here
right
in
time,
which
is
fantastic,
so
Blair
Beekman
is
the
first
name
I
have
here
and
I'm
gonna.
Ask
you
to
stand
right
here
at
this
stand,
so
we
can
get
you
biddy
recorded
as
well.
L
L
This
is
basically
a
homeless
and
a
small-time
drug
use
issue.
This
is
not
a
violent
crime
issue
is
my
feeling
and
San.
Jose
has
just
had
an
incredible
suggesting
tradition,
downtown
of
how
do
you
openly
communicate
and
work
well
with
counseling
services
for
their
homeless,
and
please
study
this
and
look
into
this
and
why
I'm
so
angry
at
this
big
belly
step.
Thank
you.
E
L
Currently,
it's
used
by
thousands
of
people
a
week
and
and
there's
a
potential
for
the
Los
Gatos
Creek
Trail
to
go
south
from
Lexington
reservoir
up
over
the
hill
and
into
Santa
Cruz
County,
and
it
also
comes
down
through
downtown,
as
we
all
know,
currently,
there's
a
couple
gaps
between
Meridian
and
Lincoln
and
then
a
gap
between
Oz
RI
and
the
Guadalupe
trail
system,
and
this
group
will
be
dealing
with
that
gap
and
I.
Just
I
just
wanted
to
mention
how
important
it
is
to
plan
the
trail
through
the
whole
development
area.
L
Here
right
now,
it's
planned
to
go
on
city
streets
cross
at
crosswalks
and
I.
Just
hope.
This
group
really
takes
the
time
and
and
comes
up
with
some
ideas
that
Google
can
deal
with
to
develop
the
trail
fully
to
not
impact
traffic
and
to
allow
pedestrians
from
the
north
and
the
south
to
get
to
Deer
Adan
and
the
new
campus.
Thank
you.
D
Creative
placemaking,
I
hope,
you'll,
think
about
reuse
of
historic
resources
in
Pittsburgh
Pennsylvania,
which
is
a
lot
poorer
than
San
Jose
and
therefore
has
a
little
bit
less.
Leverage
Google
occupies
the
old
Nabisco
Factory
and
my
third
point
has
to
do
with
I
can't
remember
what
it
is:
it's,
okay,
so
I'll
just
leave
it
at
that
Third
Point
is
very
important.
Actually,
there's
not
one
city
in
California,
with
the
population
of
more
than
150,000.
It
does
not
have
a
design
review
board
or
Commission.
We
do
not
wear
that
we're
a
big
city.
S
So
hi
Larry,
Ames,
longtime,
Creek,
advocate
and
trial
advocate
I'm
glad
to
hear
it
mention
the
daylighting
of
the
Los
Gatos
Creek
Trail,
the
vision,
2040
talked
about
reducing
the
vehicle
miles,
traveled
and
mode
shifts
and
trails
provide
a
non-motorized
transportation.
Alternative
los
gatos
creek
trail
would
come
to
the
dirt
on
station.
As
harvey
mentioned
the
day,
lighting
of
the
los
gatos
creek
is
part
of
this
dirt.
S
S
La
Scala's
Creek
would
have
to
have
a
pedestrian
bridge
over
the
Meridian
Park
Montgomery
Park
intersection
should
be
quite
complicated
and
costly,
because
you
have
to
go
from
the
southwest
corner
to
the
northwest
corner
to
the
northeast
corner,
with
connections,
ramps
and
spirals.
That
would
discourage
trail
usage.
If
you
don't
do
that,
if
you
had
at
grade
crossings,
then
you'd
have
people
at
the
traffic
lights
and
that
would
create
impede
to
the
traffic
through
the
area
to
have
a
traffic
impacts.
S
And
if
you
don't
do
that,
then
everybody
will
be
driving
there
and
you
have
to
pay
for
parking
lots
and
wider
roads,
so
you're
gonna
pay
for
it
one
way
or
the
other.
So
why
not
have
daylight
the
creek
and
have
create
a
habitat
there
get
an
extra
acre
of
parkland
the
cities
and
community
and
community
members
have
been
working
for
over
40
years
to
build
the
Los
Gatos
Creek
Trail.
This
last
1
mile
is
the
challenge,
and
but
it
is
our
connection
from
the
neighborhoods
to
the
deer
Don
area.
S
It's
the
connections
to
whatever
Park
that
you
make
in
the
area's
connections
for
people
to
get
to
the
Google
and
the
Creek
was
buried
50
years
ago,
and
if
you
do
not
daylight
it
now
it'll
be
another
half
a
century
or
more
before
you
get
a
chance
to
revisit
this.
So
please
do
it
right
now.
Thank
you.
L
Thank
You
Bryan,
Grayson
executive
director
of
preservation,
Action
Council
I,
was
pleased
to
hear
that
both
Laura
and
Barbara
raised
the
issue
of
historic
preservation
tonight,
the
sooner
that
comes
further
up
on
the
table.
In
the
conversation,
the
better
it
will
be
for
all
of
us,
you
may
or
may
not
be
aware
than
the
diri
don
t
ir
that
was
done
a
number
of
years
ago
for
the
ballpark.
It
identified
well
over
30
historic
resources
within
these
parcels.
L
Some
of
those
have
since
disappeared,
but
there's
others
that
we'd
also
don't
even
know
about
yet,
and
those
will
be
identified
in
future
surveys
as
this
project
moves
forward.
So
the
sooner
this
discussion
takes
place
and
gets
in
part
of
your
discussion,
the
better
the
decision-making
process
will
be.
Thank
you.
T
Hi
tonight,
that's
not
just
res
in
San,
Jose
I
feel
against
the
sale
of
public
lands
to
Google
or
anybody
else
for
that
matter.
More
so
because
you
know
these
lands
at
didn't,
we
taxpayers
are
paying
billions,
tens
of
billions
of
dollars
to
bring
here.
You
know,
speed,
rail
and
bar
to
San
Jose
and
to
the
area
etc.
T
They
are
paying
1.2
billion
dollars,
plus
they
are
paying
three
million
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
per
month
to
maintain
and
operate
that
property,
and
it
is
a
property
that
NASA
has
stated,
and
it's
clear
it's
out
there
that
they
have
no
use
for
those
lands.
So
it
is
good
for
them
and
their
relief.
That
Google
is,
you
know
paying
all
these
maintenance
costs
plus
you
know
a
number
of
other
freebies
that
they
are
doing
all
on
that
so
I
mean
what
we're
doing
is.
T
You
know
just
giving
away
extremely
valuable
public
lands,
and
you
know
that
they
are
still
not
beginning
to
produce
what
we
will
be
paying.
We
have
encumbered
cells,
proposition,
1a
proposition,
you
know,
2016
I
voted
for
that,
and
now
there's
two
more
rm3
from
Santa
Clara
County
Board
of
Supervisors
I
would
be
a
resounding,
and
it
first
know
for
me
and
Mayor.
Ricardo
today
has
said
it
is
in
the
Mercury
News
that
he
is
putting
out
waiting
city
staff,
whether
you
know
there
should
be
a
some
other
infrastructure
in
measuring
the
ballot.
M
Have
a
request
for
members:
this
was
something
that
was
mentioned
at
the
orientation
meeting
and
a
few
of
you
have
complied
with
it.
But
for
those
of
us
that
are
sitting
in
this
public
area,
we
can't
see
your
names.
Sometimes
there
you're
called
on
Pete,
but
who
is
Pete,
who
does
represent
so
please
again,
I'll
comply
with
that
request.
That
was
made
at
the
last
meeting
when
you
speak
also
to
staff.
M
When
you
call
on
somebody,
please
give
us
their
full
name
in
their
affiliation
or
if
you
just
turned
up
your
card,
and
you
start
speaking.
Let
us
know
who
you
are.
We
can't
we're
getting
to
know
you
over
time,
but
you
know
I,
certainly
don't
know
everybody
that's
here,
and
it
would
help
us
a
lot.
So
I'd
appreciate
it
if
you
would
comply
with
that
request.
Thank.
S
E
P
Follow
that
up,
because
it's
really
hard
to
be
back
here,
it's
not
the
best
room
for
the
community.
I
have
a
couple
of
comments
about
that,
including
where
public
comment
was
at
the
very
end
of
this
meeting.
There
was
some
discussion
about
that
at
the
last
meeting
and
as
I
understood,
cuz
I
was
following
the
draft
agenda.
It
was
originally
at
one
point
earlier
in
the
meeting
and
now
it's
at
the
end
and
as
you
can
see,
there
were
a
whole
lot
of
people
that
were
here
before
I
recognize.
P
It
could
inform
your
analysis
of
public
comment
was
in
the
beginning
of
the
meeting,
I'd
also
kind
of
like
to
adjust
the
community
benefits
discussion
because,
frankly,
sitting
back
there,
it
sounds
like
there's
a
little
bit
of
like
different
planes
going
on
when
people
are
talking
about
community
benefits
and
community
benefit
agreements
and
I'm,
not
quite
sure
we're
all.
On
the
same
page
on
that,
and
so
I'd
like
to
suggest
that
just
like
having
folks
from
Mountain
View
come
and
talk
about
their
experience.
P
Maybe
it
makes
sense
to
have
a
little
bit
of
training
or
some
folks
come
with
their
some
experience
that
they've
had
with
community
benefits
but
benefit
agreements.
What
that
can
look
like
and
what
they've
learned
from
it,
because
you
can
have
a
lot
of
collaboration
to
create
a
community
benefit
agreement.
If
you
know
in
advance,
you
know
it
doesn't
always
have
to
be
super
contentious
or
preceded
by
litigation
and
all
those
things
that
we
hear
about.
So
it
might
be
really
conducive
to
collaboration.
E
D
Caltrain
and
I'm
glad
to
see
the
recommendation
to
bring
in
folks
from
Mountain
View,
where
Google
and
working
with
the
city
have
come
up
with
some
innovative
solutions,
particularly
relating
to
transportation
and
retrofitting,
an
area
to
be
more
walkable
and
bikable
that
might
be
of
interest
here.
The
other
thing
I'm
really
glad
to
hear
from
this
group
is
an
interest
in
the
relationship
of
the
sports
and
entertainment
venue
and
the
goals
to
have
a
more
urban
and
walkable
and
transit
oriented
place
when
AT&T
Park.
D
When
the
baseball
moves
from
Candlestick
there
was
90
percent
driving
in
Candlestick
and
when
they
moved
into
downtown
San
Francisco,
they
were
moving
and
the
city
worked
with
them
and
said
you
can
have
no
more
than
50%
driving.
When
you
move
to
an
urban
area,
and
there
was
discussion,
there
was
negotiation,
there
was
collaboration
and
they
wound
up
achieving
that
goal
of
changing
a
business
that
had
been
very
car
oriented
into
something
that
was
much
more
urban
successfully,
and
in
this
case
the
arena
isn't
moving,
but
the
city
is
transforming
around
it.
D
B
B
E
E
Nope,
okay
anyways.
We
just
wanted
to
thank
you
again
very
much
for
being
here
tonight.
Thank
you
for
all
your
time.
We
just
want
to
again
recognize
next
meeting
is
on
April
9th
at
6
p.m.
and
we
do
have
the
city's
website
that
will
have
resources
on
it.
We
will
be
in
touch
with
all
of
you
before
the
next
meeting
to
share
additional
information
and
gather
some
information
and
we'll
be
here
afterwards
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank
you
again.
Very
much
have
a
great
night.