►
From YouTube: MAY 22, 2019 | Station Area Advisory Group
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
So
here
is
our
agenda
for
tonight's
meeting.
We're
gonna
start
by
going
like
we
always
do
by
approving
the
minutes
from
the
last
meeting
from
March.
11Th
can
I
get
an
approval
in
a
second
anyone
motion
to
approve
excellent
Thank,
You
Jeffrey,
second
great
all
right.
Oh,
we
go
so
as
we
typically
do.
We're
gonna
go
three
quickly
through
group
agreements
which
again
you've
all
been
great
about.
A
We're
gonna
have
a
few
different
presentations
tonight,
one
on
the
VSAT
process,
the
Deardon
stationary
plan
we'll
get
an
update
from
google
and
where
they
are,
and
then
we'll
also
be
talking
about
the
Deardon
integrated
station
concept
plan.
So
we
have
quite
a
bit
to
go
through
and
we're
gonna
leave
plenty
of
room
to
have
discussion
with
you
all
and
we'll,
as
always,
have
public
comment
as
well.
A
So
group
agreements
we've
gone
through
this
many
times,
but
really
just
be
respectful,
as
you
always
are.
Let's
not
talk
over
each
other,
always
put
yourself
in
each
other's
shoes
and
different
perspectives,
and
we
really
want
to
maintain
that
safe
space,
and
we
really
would
love
to
hear
from
you
all.
So
if
we
can
just
be
open
and
friendly
as
we
always
are
and
as
always
have
a
good
time,
that's
key.
A
So,
with
that
I'm
gonna
hand
it
over
to
Lori
I,
just
real
quick
as
an
intro
to
this
we're
gonna
have
again
an
ovary
introduction.
We're
gonna
have
information
about
the
dese
app
a
little
bit
about
community
engagement,
also,
some
information
about
Google
and
the
mixed
use
update,
and
this
and
just
generally
kind
of
how
all
that
integrates
they're
different
processes,
but
there's
a
lot
of
similarities.
So
I'm
gonna
ask
that
we
hold
comments.
It's
all
the
end
of
that
present.
We're
gonna
have
a
discussion
with
you
all
in
so
with
that
your
honor.
D
All
right
so
I'm,
just
gonna,
go
through
a
couple,
slides
really
quickly
to
just
set
the
stage
and
remind
everyone
of
how
far
we've
come
and
what
the
background
has
been
for
the
dear
non-stationary
of
planning.
So
the
good
neighbor
committee,
which
I
know
several
of
you,
were
on
began
in
2009
and
the
city
also
conducted
other
public
outreach
during
the
2009-2010
timeframe,
and
so
that
culminated
in
adopting
the
Deardon
Station
area
plan
in
2014
and
then
in
2017.
D
2018
ended
with
a
city
council
meeting
where
they
approved
the
memorandum
of
understanding
with
Google,
as
well
as
the
land
sale
and
the
option
agreement
for
the
ABC
lot
next
to
the
arena,
and
so
2019
has
really
been
about
ramping
up.
Google
began
preparation
of
a
mixed-use
plan
and
the
city
has
been
preparing
for
an
amendment
process
for
the
Deardon
station
area
plan.
So
next
Rosalyn
will
go
through
that
process
that
we're
anticipating
to
begin
here.
E
Well,
good
evening
again,
I'm
Rosalyn,
Huey
I'm,
the
director
for
the
Department
of
Planning
building
and
code
enforcement
with
the
city
of
San,
Jose,
very
glad
to
be
with
you
this
evening
to
share
with
you
about
what
we
anticipate
for
the
Deardon
station
area
plan
amendment
process
nationally
before
I
get
started,
because
clearly
there
are
many.
Many
staff
members
within
my
department
and
Willie
across
several
other
city
departments
are
going
to
be
involved
in
this
process
and
I.
E
Do
would
just
want
to
take
a
moment
to
introduce
actually
a
new
member
of
our
planning
team
Robert
Manford
over
here.
He
can
raise
his
hand,
so
Robert
Manford
has
been
with
our
planning
department
for
about
six
months.
He
comes
to
us
from
the
city
of
Los
Angeles
and
he
is
serving
as
our
deputy
planning
director
and
will
be
very
involved
throughout
this
process,
particularly
from
the
environmental
review
process.
E
So
you're
going
to
be
seeing
lots
of
Robert
so
again
just
building
upon
the
2014
plan
for
the
do-don
Station
area,
and
really
we
see
this
as
opportunity
to
really
implement
the
guiding
principles
that
we've
always
had
for
the
Deardon
area
and
so
we're
just
gonna
be
building
upon
these
guiding
principles
of
what
I
kind
of
consider
as
core
values
for
the
entire
area.
Obviously
you
know
we
have
the
opportunity
to
really
create
a
new
neighborhood
district.
It's
going
to
be
a
major
destination
area,
a
place
that
has
new
intermodal
a
new
intermodal
station.
E
So
what
does
the
the
Deardon
station
area
plan
cover?
It
covers
a
lot
actually
I'll
go
through
these
elements
quickly,
but
obviously
there's
a
big
focus
on
land
uses
and
where
they're
located
a
focus
on
urban
design
and
again
those
public
spaces,
the
gathering
spaces
that
are
going
to
be
so
critical
for
the
people
living
and
working
in
the
area,
the
station
concept
and
how
that
is
laid
out,
obviously
transportation
and
connectivity,
and
how
the
area
is
going
to
work
within
the
existing
neighborhood
surrounding
the
area.
Obviously,
we
know
that
that
parking
supply
demand.
E
It's
going
to
be
a
big
item
for
the
area,
along
with
the
other
infrastructure
needs
affordable
housing.
We
know
it's
very
important
again,
part
of
the
place
making
that
includes
public
art
and
and
other
opportunities
for
for
place,
making
ensuring
that
we
have
really
good
quality
design
guidelines
by
which
development
proposals
will
be
measured
and
then
how
we
can
actually
maximize
the
development
potential
in
the
area.
E
So
why
the
need
to
amend
the
d-sub
well,
there's
been
lots
of
changes
right
since
2014,
and
we
now
have
implementation
partner
to
help
us
implement
that
vision
from
2014
so,
for
example,
we're
no
longer
planning
for
a
baseball
park.
So
that's
a
big
change
in
the
in
the
plan.
We
now
have
the
Dehradun
integrated
station
concept,
planning
effort
underway,
and
we
want
to
incorporate
that
work.
E
We
have
the
implementation
partner
Google,
who
is
pursuing
a
mixed-use
development
within
the
station
area
and
just
recently
the
city
completed
the
downtown
airspace
and
development
capacity
study
which
council
approved
earlier
this
year.
So
we
now
have
the
opportunity
for
higher
heights
in
downtown
and
in
the
Dehradun
area,
Council
also
approved
last
year,
climate,
smart
San
Jose.
E
So
what
we
expect
to
actually
change
in
the
station
area
plan
again,
first
and
foremost,
an
opportunity
for
more
development
capacity
to
reflect
the
increase
in
heights,
we'll
be
looking
at
land
use,
designation
changes.
For
example,
I
mentioned
earlier,
the
ballpark
that
no
longer
being
planned
for
so
with
that
land
use,
we'll
look
for
that
particular
area,
as
well
as
other
opportunities
for
land
use
designations,
to
make
sure
that
we
really
have
the
the
good
mix
of
office,
development
and
housing
opportunity
and
perhaps
other
uses
as
well.
E
We're
going
to
be
revising
some
of
the
concepts
around
connectivity,
infrastructure,
transportation
and
and
public
spaces.
So,
for
example,
we
know
how
important
that
some
of
the
gathering
spaces
are
in
the
station
area,
so
we're
going
to
be
looking
at.
You
know
where,
where
should
those
areas
be
best
located?
E
E
So
when
we
look
at
the
actions
that
the
City
Council
will
be
taken
taking
so
from
the
city
side
again,
the
city
will
be
initiating
amendments
to
the
Deardon
area,
and
so
obviously
we
know
that
that
google
will
have
ideas
for
their
mixed-use
project
and
we'll
be
submitting
likely
submitting
amendments
to
the
Dehradun
area.
The
city
will
be
looking
at
the
dirt
on
area
from
a
very
comprehensive
approach
and
making
sure
that
we
have
appropriate
amendment
for
the
non-google
homelands.
E
We
anticipate
that
that
will
also
include
general
plan
amendments,
as
well
as
the
implement
three
implementation
plans
and
I
referenced
earlier.
So
on
the
Google
side.
Obviously,
the
city
will
be
processing
their
entitlements
and
the
council
will
be
taking
actions
such
as
the
d-sub
amendment
and
and
other
entitlement
actions
such
as
a
rezoning
and
then
obviously
the
City
Council
will
be
taking
action
on
the
development
agreement,
which
includes
the
community
benefits
plan
and
obviously,
with
all
of
this
work.
E
E
So
in
terms
of
time
line
here
is
a
really
good
representation.
You'll
see
the
three
components
so
for
the
Darion
station
area
plan
itself,
the
Google
mixed-use
development
project,
the
development
agreement
we
see
all
of
this
work
again
have
been
happening
concurrently
and
throughout
this
entire
process.
There'll
be
continued
community
engagement.
We
know
how
important
that
is,
and
we
see
the
opportunity
to
really
do
a
lot
of
joint
community
engagement
throughout
the
entire
process.
So
this
will
be
happening
throughout
the
rest.
E
The
remaining
of
this
year
and
concluding
we
anticipate
by
the
end
of
2020
and
then
you'll
see
on
the
right
in
terms
of
final
decision-making.
So
all
of
these
plans
documents
actions
they'll
be
going
to
the
Planning
Commission.
The
Planning
Commission
will
be
making
a
recommendation
to
the
City
Council,
then,
with
final
action
by
the
City
Council.
D
So
I'm
just
gonna,
elaborate
more
on
that
bottom
bar
the
Community
Engagement,
so
the
MOU
and
City
Council
collectively
give
direction
on
some
things
what
they'd
like
to
see
in
terms
of
community
engagement,
and
so
this
would
supplement
what
the
city
normally
does
with
a
development
project.
So
at
a
minimum.
This
is
going
to
include
periodic
reports
to
this
group
to
share
information
and
get
feedback.
D
Last
time
we
said
we'd
we're
looking
at
every
three
to
four
months,
but
we're
thinking
it
might
be
a
little
more
frequent
two
to
four
moving
forward
at
least
one
of
these
meetings.
We
will
be
provide
presenting
to
you
and
getting
feedback
on
the
draft
development
agreement
before
that
goes
to
City,
Council
and
then
similar
to
the
engagement
process.
We
did
last
year
we're
also
going
to
be
using
a
variety
of
other
methods
to
involve
the
broader
public.
So
that
would
you
involve
workshops,
online
tools
and
pop-ups
things
like
that.
D
So
this
is
our
tentative
thinking
it's
its
preliminary
right
now,
but
we
wanted
to
just
give
you
a
flavor
of
what
this
could
like
and
could
look
like
in
terms
of
the
number
of
outreach
rounds.
So
we're
thinking
about
three
starting
with
a
kickoff
round
to
present
the
project
description
and
do
their
environmental
review
scoping
and
provide
an
overview
of
the
process.
The
next
round
would
be
more
focused
on
specific
topics
like
land
use,
transportation,
public
space
and
then
the
third
round
would
be
the
actual
plans
themselves.
D
So
the
engagement
process
will
really
build
upon
the
past,
and
so
I
started
this
presentation
by
going
over
quickly
what
those
different
milestones
were.
So
in
the
past,
the
good
neighbor
committee
and
other
public
outreach
drove
the
development
of
the
Deardon
station
area
plan
and
a
few
years
later
we
did
the
engagement
process
and
those
desired
outcomes
are
directly
reflected
in
the
report
that
summarized
all
of
the
activities,
but
also
in
the
MOU,
and
so
the
MOU
really
becomes
the
foundation
for
work
moving
forward.
D
It
includes
the
guiding
principles
and
shared
goals
for
the
development,
and
so
I
hope
you
all.
You
take
a
look
at
that
again.
We
provided
the
MOU
in
your
packet.
We
also
provided
you
some
a
one-page
memo
on
the
additional
City
Council
direction
that
was
given
at
the
December
4th
meeting.
That
was
not
directly
reflected
in
the
final
MOU,
but
it's
still
important
direction
for
the
staff
and
Google
to
be
keeping
in
mind
moving
forward,
and
so
we
we've
taken
that
foundation
and
begun
to
work
on
some
preliminary
concepts.
D
D
The
concept
plan
team
will
continue
to
coordinate
with
the
city
processes
related
to
the
Deardon
station
area.
So,
of
course
we
have
the
Deardon
station
area
plan
and
the
amendments
and
the
google
development.
That's
a
part
of
that
there's
also
the
downtown
transportation
plan.
So
you
can
see
there's
a
lot
of
overlap
in
terms
of
topics:
access
parking,
urban
integration,
things
like
public
spaces,
so
these
processes
will
all
be
happening
over
the
next
couple
years
and
concurrently
really
having
to
talk
to
each
other
and
be
coordinate
to
be
consistent.
D
So
the
this
diagram
here
shows
how
the
d-sub
and
the
sorry
dear
Don
Station
area
plan
and
the
Google
project.
Those
are
the
timelines
you
saw
earlier
and
layered
on.
Here
is
the
concept
plan
and
town
transportation
plan
so
burn
phase,
one
now
of
the
the
concept
plan,
while
we're
working
on
these
ramping
up
for
these
efforts
and
then
later
this
year,
these
things
will
begin
and
so
we're
it
seems
like
a
lot
is
going
on
and
it
is,
but
it's
actually
aligning
very
well
to
be
able
to
have.
D
B
Hi
I'm
Joe
van
Bellingham
senior
director
of
development
for
Google
in
awhile,
since
I've
been
back
here.
I
just
want
to
reiterate
a
few
things.
I
talked
about.
My
first
meeting
was
you
know:
we're
really
focused
on
creating
the
right
kind
of
place
and
place,
isn't
just
about
the
physical
things
and
buildings.
It's
about
really
trying
to
design.
For
those.
You
know
urban
experiences
that
people
crave
and
how
do
you
program
these
places
and
how
do
you
create
a
sense
of
community
in
that?
Our
approach
to
this
is
really
around.
B
How
do
you
balance
the
needs
of
the
community,
the
needs
above
environment?
How
do
you
create
economically
replicable
solutions?
You
know
enhance
the
economic
well-being
of
the
community
all
through
a
sense
lens
of
innovation
and,
of
course,
you
know
rooted
in
a
deep
understanding
of
the
community
and
its
context.
So
we've
been
spending
a
lot
of
time.
Listening
we've
participated
in
about
a
hundred
and
fifty
hours
of
City
led
community
meetings
as
well.
As
you
know,
over
30
community
meetings
I
personally
enjoyed
the
community
walks.
B
B
Recover,
as
many
of
you
probably
have
met
through
the
community
watts
and
I'm
very
happy
to
announce
our
new
addition
to
the
team
who
joined
in
January
Alexa
arena,
so
Alexa
and
I
have
worked
together
in
the
past.
I
really
admire
her
work.
She's
got
a
deep
experience
around
place
creation
but,
more
importantly,
she
has
a
deep
passion
and
deep
thinker
around
social
infrastructure,
and
we
all
know
that.
That's
an
important
thing
that
we
got
to
get
right
in
this
development
and
very
excited
about
having
her.
Here.
B
F
You
it's
it's
really
great
to
be
here.
I
feel,
like
I
know
you
all
in
a
way,
because
I've
had
the
pleasure
of
watching
a
lot
of
videos
and
getting
up
to
speed
on
the
content
of
some
great
work
over
the
past
couple
of
years,
and
it
was
part
of
what
really
inspired
me
to
to
come
and
take
the
job
into
to
work
on
this
projects.
F
Likewise,
it's
very
much
rooted
in
the
context
of
so
many
different
elements
when
you're
working
at
at
this
scale
and
thinking
about
how
can
I
create
the
right
type
of
mixed-use
plan.
There's
everything
from
the
technicality
of
a
site
and
sign
constraints
of
place
in
the
context,
in
the
nature
of
the
environment,
of
your
round
of
community,
of
both
the
positive
sides
of
community
and
some
of
the
areas
where
we
really
need
to
pay
strong
attention
to
like
areas
of
homelessness
around
the
site.
F
That
I
think
we
can
have
a
strong
sense
of
leadership
on
how
the
project
can
help
really
get
ahead
of
and
lean
into,
and
also
the
policy
around
us
of
how
the
city's
advancing
in
so
many
different
ways.
And
how
can
we
reflect
that
within
the
place,
as
well
as
creating
as
Joe
referenced
an
economically
viable
project?
So
really
it's
exciting
to
us
to
think
about
how
all
those
pieces
can
orchestrate
and
come
together
in
a
complex
way.
F
First
and
foremost,
this
is
a
diagram
you
saw
a
couple
of
sag
meetings
ago
and
it's
about
enhancing
real
connections
and,
and
that's
the
really
special
part
of
this
site
is
that
it
is
at
the
Nexus
of
incredible
transit,
incredible
natural
infrastructure
and
a
really
diverse
and
vibrant
set
of
communities
around
us.
And
so
there's
so
much
opportunity
here
to
connect
in
and
to
grow
from
our
context
and
the
key
and
principle
to
that.
F
How
do
we
make
sure
small
business
is
existing
businesses
are
part
of
this
development
in
its
growth.
How
can
we
amplify
the
best
of
what
San
Jose
is
all
about
and
create
a
really
vibrant
social
welcoming
environment
through
our
streets
through
our
programming
through
what
we're
supporting
through
our
social
infrastructure
and
how
can
that
become
the
basis?
So
this
is
really
of
design.
So
it's
really
trying
to
flip
from
a
building.
G
F
Ultimately,
San
Jose
is
this
incredible:
diverse
culture,
rich
place
of
creators
and
innovators
and
with
great
history
to
it
we
decided
to
come
to
San
Jose,
because
we
very
much
want
to
be
a
part
of
the
city.
We
are
not
here
to
build
a
campus
in
the
city.
We
were
built
here
to
join
that
city
and
to
think
about
how
we
can
bring
this
part
of
the
city
into
its
next
generation,
taking
that
ethos
into
it.
So
we
take
that
very
seriously
and
that
someone
relates
to
the
process.
F
We're
gonna
go
through,
and
so
part
of
this
was
inviting
you
to
kind
of
help
us
understand
that
process
and
give
us
advice
on
on
the
types
of
ways.
We
should
best
do
that
because
the
process
is
getting
that
right
is
really
gonna
tell
us
what
type
of
it
is
really
gonna
drive
that
outcome
and
there's
three
different
ways.
We
think
about
that.
At
this
stage
the
first
is
advisory,
which
you
all
are
key
part
of
everything
that
we've
sort
of
start
to
think
through
and
incubate.
F
We're
going
to
use
you
all
as
a
sounding
board
for
us
of.
Is
this
the
right
direction?
It's
a
great
group
of
people
that
we
can
really
learn
a
lot
from,
and-
and
we
want
to
do
that
with
you
through
the
journey-
there's
also
the
side
of
place
creation,
which
we
could
also
talk
about
visa
view,
that
social
infrastructure
and
that's
really
thinking
through
deep
partnerships.
F
Then
then,
this
type
of
forum,
which
is
hard
for
for
certain
types
of
people
to
engage
in
so
it's
really
about
having
open
houses
and
going
to
different
neighborhoods
and
communities
and
kind
of
getting
out
there
and
getting
feedback
where
people
are
which
we
will
do
over
the
course
of
the
next
three
to
six
months
as
well
as
we
built
up
the
plan.
So
all
of
that
kind
of
coalesce
is
to
the
idea
of
a
really
strong
public/private.
F
Partnership,
which
again
is
is,
is
really
the
exciting
part
for
us
about
this
project
and
I
think
something
that
you
all
have
co-created
and
that
culminated
in
the
MOU,
which
is
way
more
than
just
about
design.
But
it's
really
about
how
can
we
partner
together
to
find
the
right
programs
to
find
the
right
co-creators
in
order
to
create
what
can
be
a
really
great
part
of
the
city?
F
So
we
really
look
forward
to
going
on
that
journey
with
you
and
we
we
hope
to
use
this
as
an
invitation
to
have
some
further
conversations
with
many
of
you,
both
individually,
but
also
as
a
group,
to
give
us
feedback
on
on
how
best
to
go
through
that.
So
hopefully
this
give
you
some
ideas
of
where
our
head
is
and,
and
we
look
forward
to
doing
a
little
Q&A.
Thank
you.
Yeah.
B
I
just
like
to
reiterate,
too
that
we
really
want
to
be
an
extension
of
the
city.
This
isn't
about
an
office
campus
and
we've
heard
the
community
loud
and
clear
about
balancing
the
needs,
and
we
know
that
we
have
to
be
a
player
in
housing
and
affordability
and
all
these
important
social
infrastructure
issues
we
totally
get
the
importance
of
the
creek
and
what
that
could
do
to
connect
people
to
nature
and
preserve
that
resource.
B
A
F
So
so
this
is
our
schedule
for
for
the
coupling
summer
and
Beyond
it.
It
is
touching
on
more
from
the
e
IR
lens
of
the
planning
process,
but
simultaneous
to
this
lens,
we
can
go
through
how
we
believe
we
build
up.
Also
the
public
benefits
plan
so
over
the
course
of
this
summer,
as
I
reference
we'll
go
through
a
variety
of
in
community
engagement
activities
and
that
in
the
latter
part
of
July
or
early
August,
we
hope
to
come
back
to
you
all
with
some
conceptual
thinking
that
starts
to
almost
on
a
dawning
level.
F
But
we
still
want
to
have
some
good
active
conversations
around.
What
are
the
key
things
from
concept
from
the
MOU
over
to
action
that
we
should
that
we
should
consider
as
it
relates
to
those
public
benefit
pieces,
and
then
it
will
take
about
a
year
to
finish
the
AI
art
leading
up
to
that
fall.
2020
date,
they'll
be
obviously
quite
a
bit
of
activity
within
that
year,
where
we're
working
through
advancing
the
design
into
more
specific.
F
You
know
a
phase
one
of
kind
of
looking
at
what
it
could
look
like
for
more
of
a
building
perspective
versus
a
planning
perspective
and
likewise
advance
again
those
public
benefit
agreements
and
what
that
looks
like
and
then,
after
that,
we
also
have
this
great
opportunity
because
Google
there
is
a
great
benefit
to
Google,
not
being
more
what
you
would
see
in
a
typical
development
world.
You
kind
of
you
get
through
the
process
and
it
more
ends
there
that
we're
in
we're
in
for
the
long
haul.
F
A
Thank
you
very
much,
and
now
we
officially
shift
to
the
Q&A
I
was
told
to
remind
you
all.
My
name
is
Dave
Javed
from
plan
to
place
a
consultant
working
with
the
city.
Sorry
I
forgot
to
say
that
earlier
so
now
we
have
a
list
of
questions
up
here.
For
you
I
know
that
was
a
lot
of
information
to
absorb,
but
we
wanted
just
really
understanding
that
all
these
different
processes
are
very
much
interrelated,
very
much
rooted
in
community
values
and
community
engagement.
We
want
to
get
your
input
on
the
overall
process.
A
Any
questions
you
have
your
thoughts
on
the
community
engagement,
that's
very
important.
If
you
give
us
feedback
what
other
type
of
engagement
activities
we
might
want
to
consider
and
then
anything
else
that
you
want
us
to
consider.
We
have
about
15
to
20
minutes
for
this
item,
because
there's
a
lot
more
to
discuss.
So
if
we
can
keep
the
questions
or
comments
as
brief
as
possible,
I
would
greatly
appreciate
it
and
then
we'll
get
through
this
process.
A
C
Thank
you
and
thank
you
for
the
presentation,
if
you
could
flip
back
to
the
slide
with
the
schedule
not
necessary.
One
of
the
things
that
I
think
about
before
you
get
into
an
e
IR
process
is
that
you
have
something
that
is
a
little
more
detailed
about
the
plans
we
haven't
seen
anything
that's
even
like
a
massing
plan.
Yet
so,
when
Google
talks
about
not
a
campus,
I
really
have
no
idea
what
to
imagine.
So
that's
a
lot
to
happen
before
any
IR.
F
That'll
be
the
July
and
August,
where
will
will
show
over
the
course
of
July
and
August?
How
are
thinking
about
Street
networks
the
how
the
blocks
are
forming?
What
are
the
elements
of
how
the
pieces,
like
where's,
the
retail,
going
where
the
mix
of
use
is
going?
Have
we
optimized
that?
How
are
the
creek
frontage
is
working?
F
H
Okay,
Jonathan
Martinez,
Georgetown
and
Cahill
homeowners
association,
which
is
ground
zero,
something
to
consider
or
try
and
find
out
I
mean
we
all
know
about
the
Google
buses,
leaving
San
Francisco.
Soon
a
lot
of
your
employees
like
living
in
San,
Francisco
and
commuting
down
to
Mountain
View.
Do
we
have
you
looked
into
how
many
people
would
actually
are
do
live
in
San,
Jose,
commute
up
to
Mountain,
View
and
or
may
want
to
move
closer
to
Ground
Zero,
and
would
they
be
renters
or
homeowners?
F
F
H
I
To
give
you
great
qudoos
I
was
up
at
your
campus
today
for
the
Egret
office
hours
for
those
of
you
who
haven't
been
up
to
their
campus
in
Mountain
View.
They
have
a
one
of
the
main
Egret
rookeries
in
the
Bay.
Area
is
on
their
campus
and
rather
than
let
the
cars
go
by
during
this
five-month
mating
season,
they
close
off
a
street
and
it's
pedestrian
only
and
pedestrian
bikes.
It's
a
great
thing
and
the
the
the
Audubon
Society
goes
out
on
Wednesdays
at
11:30
s
for
you
to
enjoy
it.
I
So
that's
first
thing.
Second
thing:
the
big:
the
10-ton
elephant
in
the
room
is
you're,
going
to
put
more
pressure
on
gentrification
and
housing
prices,
so
I
want
to
know
what
you're
doing
to
get
ahead
of
that,
so
that
we
don't
increase
the
amount
of
homelessness
that
we
already
have
a
significant
amount
in
the
area
of
the
campus
that
you're
proposing
I.
F
Think
that's
a
very
critical
issue
that
we
are
absolutely
looking
at
and
then
we're
we're
trying
to
do
that
in
a
few
different
ways.
First,
off
you
know
that
the
city
is
doing
the
housing
study
to
try
to
understand
that
citywide,
that's
going
to
inform
us
a
lot
on
how
we
should
respond
through
the
site
and
what
is
it
that
our
site
can
do
to
contribute
to
that
broader
strategy.
Cuz
I
think
there's
a
there's,
a
problem
there
that
we
really
need
to
lean
into
together,
that's
even
broader
than
the
site
itself.
F
That
really
needs
to
be
addressed,
and
so,
but
we're
very
much
interested
in
finding
the
right
models
of
how
we
can
address
homelessness
and
affordability
and
housing
in
the
right
way
for
this
site.
So
it's
certainly
something
we
imagine
you
in
advancing
along
with
the
city
and
really
respect
I
did
something
we
need
to
double
down
on
so.
J
I
think
too,
it's
important
to
think
of
housing
regionally.
So
if
you
look
at
Mountain
View,
you
know
we
advocated
for
thousands
of
units
to
be
built
in
North,
Bay
Shore,
and
we
put
a
project
up
in
Mountain
View
as
well,
and
we're
working
to
the
city
to
get
the
approvals
on
that
for
thousands
of
units
and
we're
also
fighting
the
same
good
fight
in
Sunnyvale.
To
have
that
office
park
include
housing
as
well,
and
we
see
San
Jose
is
another
piece
of
that
puzzle
on
homelessness.
F
Do
you
think
so?
There's
two
mechanisms
there
is
Google
and
what
Google
can
give
there's
also
things
like
commercial
assessment
fees,
which
we've
been
supportive
of
and
agree
that
office
needs
to
pay
a
fee
to
help
to
create
more
affordability
and
housing
and
address
some
of
the
homelessness
problem.
So
we
are
we're
committed
on
both
ends.
Great.
F
C
You
know
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
chicken
and
egg,
because
there
are
so
many
pieces
of
this
incredible
puzzle
that
have
to
be
addressed
and,
and
one
of
the
most
important
really
is
addressing
the
rail
alignment
first
and
making
sure
we
get
that
right
and
those
public
investments
working
in
a
seamless
way.
So
how
do
you
guys
approach
and
you're
getting
tons
of
feedback
over
the
last
year?
I
mean
you've,
probably
heard
from
everybody,
and
you
have
a
giant
long
lit
wish
list
of
things
so
how?
C
F
And
I
think
actually
the
dis
process
I
mean
you'll,
hear
a
bit
more
about
it
next,
but
is
it
a
really
great
time
to
then
come
together
with
the
mixed
use
plan
process
and
that's
exactly
what
we're
doing
and
because
it's
gone
through
just
this
very
robust
process
of
really
understanding-
and
you
know
it's
still
iterating,
but
all
the
technical
work
which
then
informs
for
us.
How
do
we
come
together
with
it
and
then
you
know
kind
of
push
and
pull
between
the
two
in
order
to
find
the
right
solution.
F
So
we
look
forward
to
doing
that
over
the
summer.
We
feel
like
it
is
the
right
time
for
those
two
pieces
to
come
together,
more
specifically
and,
of
course,
there's
so
much
feedback
and
so
many
great
existing
or
Frank.
Frankly,
we
don't
want
to
recreate
a
lot
of
the
great
conversation.
That's
already
happening
happened,
and
so,
whether
it's
the
SAG
report,
the
MOU.
You
know
the
great
report
that
Silicon
Valley
rising
is
done.
F
A
C
C
That's
part
of
the
development
agreement,
so
if
you
could
speak
to
what
the
process
will
be
for
that-
and
my
second
question
is
for
both
Google
and
the
city
as
I
see
that
there's
community
engagement
happening
this
summer,
which
is
like
right
around
the
corner
for
whatever
you
think
about
what
happened
at
the
City
Council
meeting,
there
was
a
lot
of
community
members
who
felt
like
they
were
unheard
by
both
city
and
the
google
and
google.
So
what
are
you
both
planning
on
doing
on
addressing
those.
L
Parts
of
the
community
that
felt
unheard
so
maybe
I
can
take
the
first
question:
I'm
Kim,
Wallace,
deputy
city
manager,
one
of
the
things
we
provided
to
you
was
a
piece
called
the
City
Council
direction
from
the
December
4th
2018
council
meeting
I
think
those
of
you
that
were
tracking
it.
It
was
a
very
long
kind
of
complex
set
of
recommendations,
and
so
just
want
everybody
to
know
that
one
of
the
specific
directions
from
council
was.
L
This
is
a
top
of
page
two
of
that
handout,
reconvene
the
station
area
advisory
group
to
discuss
and
provide
feedback
in
a
public
forum
on
the
final
recommended
community
benefits
and
development
agreement
prior
to
any
council
decision.
So
we
had
clear
direction
to
bring
what
we
negotiate
and
agree
to
and
are
recommending
first
to
the
SAG
before
it
goes
to
Planning,
Commission
and
then
to
Council.
So
that
would
happen.
You
know
second
half
of
2020
and.
J
F
F
Look
I
hear
what
you're
doing,
but
I
think
you
should
also
be
doing
these
types
of
events
like
whether
it's
reaching
out
to
schools
and
trying
to
figure
out
how
can
we
get
people's
voices
heard
so
that
we
understand
them
to
the
best
of
our
ability
were
through
your
organization's
have
more
meetings
with
with
the
constituents,
the
people
that
you
interact
with,
and
so
we
are
happy
to
and
committed
to
doing
that
and
so
I.
We
we
can
do
that
in
a
variety
of
forums.
There's
so
many
different
ways
to
do
it.
F
D
I'll
just
add,
as
the
leader
of
the
community
engagement
process,
that
all
of
last
year
and
including
the
council
meeting,
you
know,
we've
done
a
lot
of
reflecting
and
I've
talked
to
a
lot
of
you
and
a
lot
of
other
people
about.
How
can
we
continue
to
do
better
in
terms
of
making
people
feel
heard
and
so
part
of
it
I
want,
to
put
it
a
little
bit
back
on
you
all
to
help
brainstorm
with
that,
because
I,
of
course,
have
lots
of
ideas.
D
Part
of
that
is
developing
deeper
partnerships
and
relationships
with
community
leaders
and
community
members
and
just
being
more
creative
I
think
you
know
a
lot
of
what
we
do
can
feel
very
dry
and
technical
and
I
I
want
to
work
harder
on
making
this
material
be
more
approachable
and
draw
in
more
people
into
the
conversation.
So
I
have
ideas
and
I
would
love
to
have
follow-up
conversations
to
really
dive
into
those
with
all
of
you,
tonight's,
an
opportunity
to
we're
posing
the
question.
What
are
your
thoughts
and
ideas?
M
E
M
Design
guidelines
is
pretty
far
down
on
the
list,
its
10th
out
of
12
and
what
I'm
concerned
about
is
there
are
some
projects
like
I?
If
you
walk
down
autumn
from
our
neighborhood
to
go
to
the
tank?
There's
a
project,
that's
for
housing,
that's
you
know
in
in
the
works,
possibly
and
they're
kind
of
getting
a
jump
on
everything
before
we
get
any
design
guidelines
for
the
area
in
place
and
I'm
concerned
that,
ultimately,
the
whole
area
has
a
cohesive
design
element
to
it
that
sings.
M
Well,
it's
not
just
a
hodgepodge
of
things
like
oh
wow,
you
can
tell
like
you
know
in
certain
parts
of
of
the
area
you
can
tell
like.
Well,
that's
building
us
from
the
50s-
and
this
is
building
is
from
the
70s,
and
this
building
is
from
the
90s.
You
can
date
them
by
just
the
Dare
design,
character
and
I'd
like
to
see
something
a
little
bit.
N
M
E
Absolutely,
and
and
clearly
we
know
that
quality
design
is,
is
crucial
for
this
new
district
and
to
your
point,
so
you
know,
we've
got
development
projects
that
are
under
construction.
Now
we
fully
anticipate
you
know
more
development
proposals
coming
forward
and
I
think
you're.
Absolutely
right,
so
we'll
have
to
definitely
make
sure
that
we're
referencing,
just
the
the
recently
approved
city
counselled,
downtown
design
guidelines
have
been
fully
updated
and
really
robust
and
really
speak
to
issues
of
the
architectural
character,
the
quality,
the
public
spaces
right.
We
know
how
crucial
that's
going
to
be
so.
A
D
O
K
Great
Jeffrey
we
can
with
working
partnerships
whose
sake
just
went.
One
comment
to
the
the
question
about
the
when
the
the
SOG
gets
to
discuss
the
community
benefits.
I.
Believe
the
council
discussion
was
talking
about
the
community
benefits
conversation,
perhaps
preceding
the
SOG
weighing
in
on
the
development
agreement.
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
for
this
group
to
not
necessarily
have
to
weigh
in
when
the
cake
has
already
been
baked,
but
hopefully
earlier
on
in
the
process.
So
hopefully
we
can
figure
out
a
way
to
do
that.
K
My
question
two
and
a
half
months
ago,
when
we
met
last
meant
the
timeline
that
was
presented
both
in
the
disk
process
and
from
the
staff
talking
about
the
process
for
the
Google
development.
I
had
an
extra
12
months
on
to
the
timeline.
I
believe
this
is
the
first
time
that
we've
heard
about
the
kind
of
condensed
timeline,
given
all
the
concerns
of
dealing
with
the
housing
crisis.
Where
we
are,
you
know
you
look
at
the
the
dese
app
the
process
started
in
2009.
K
It
took
until
2014
and
since
we
first
started
that
deset
plan
you
know,
rents
have
gone
up
about.
Sixty
percent
the
area
around
Deardon
station
has
become
one
of
the
kind
of
largest
hotspots
of
displacement,
more
Latino
families
displaced
than
any
other
part
of
the
city.
Right
now
you
know
it's
it's
it's
hard
to
ignore
text,
growths
impact
on
displacement,
housing
prices.
All
these
things
and
I
appreciate
it.
K
Joe
your
comments
at
the
end
of
the
presentation
that
this
is
a
focal
point,
but
I
think
the
fact
that
that
wasn't
really
a
vision
for
that
and
what
how
that's
actually
done
wasn't
represented
in
the
presentation
and
that
staff
won't
have
begun
their
examination
of
the
housing
issue,
probably
for
a
number
of
months.
It
takes
time
to
do
in
our
RFP,
get
a
consultant
design.
A
study
get
a
study
back
figure.
K
It
out
I'm,
just
really
worried
that
we're
we're
pushing
ahead
on
this
timeline
for
Annie
I
are
in
the
fall
before
we
really
understand
the
impact
of
the
housing
issue,
much
less
than
the
solutions
to
the
housing
issue
and,
at
the
same
time,
per
Teresa's
conversation
pieces
comments.
You
know
the
disc
process
we'll
hear
about
later:
they're,
not
planning
to
be
wrapped
up
until
the
fall
of
what
2021.
Well,
you
will
hear
from
them.
L
I
mean
I
can
start
when
we
went
to
council
on
December
4th.
At
that
point
we
said
that
we
think
this
faith
you,
which
is
the
project
design
and
review,
would
be
about
two
years.
We
said
2019
2020
and
we
said
plus,
and
so
now,
we've
had
time
to
take
a
look
at
a
number
of
factors
and
create
what
we
think
is
sort
of
a
realistic
target
plan,
so
you're,
absolutely
right.
L
Jeffrey
one
of
the
factors
was
better
understanding
how
the
the
disk
project
was
going
to
integrate
with
deception,
with
the
review
of
the
Google
project,
and
actually
it's
shaping
up
quite
nicely,
because
we
expect,
by
this
fall,
that
the
preliminary
concept
for
the
rail
and
the
station
there'll
be
a
preferred
concept,
so
that
that
timing
is
quite
good.
We
also
took
a
look
at
those
implementation
plans
and
you're
absolutely
right
that
affordable
housing
implementation
plan
how
we're
going
to
get
to
the
25
percent,
affordable
housing
in
the
Deardon
station
area.
L
It's
really
important
to
be
clear
that
creating
that
original
decent
plan
did
take
many
years,
because
we
were
starting
from
scratch
and
when
we
talk
about
amending
the
disa,
we're
really
talking
about
making
some
likely
incremental
changes,
because
the
vision,
primary
objectives,
you
know
a
lot
of
what
the
community
works
so
hard
for
and
what
the
council
approved.
It
were
really
updating
it
five
years
later.
So
certainly
some
things
have
have
changed.
So
for
those
reasons,
what
we're
saying
now
is
I
think
what
we
said
on
December
4th
is
still
generally
true.
L
A
P
P
What's
going
to
change,
why
is
it
gonna
change
and
I?
Think
one
thing
that
I've
just
been
thinking
about
is:
how
do
we
make
sure
that
the
original
deset
plan
from
2014
and
what
was
laid
out
then
isn't
going
to
constrain
the
vision
that
I
think
that
this
group
has
worked
hard
on,
especially
on
the
housing
front?
P
Guess
it's
just
as
a
general
comment
that
as
we're
looking
at
you
know
whether
or
not
the
2014
plan
can
serve
as
a
like
what
pieces
of
it
serve
as
a
useful
model
for
and
of
what
we're
looking
at
going
forward
and
and
how
can
we
better
reflect?
What
I
think
this
group
is
acknowledges
the
need
for
more
housing
for
integrating
that
affordable
housing
piece
and
also,
for
you
know
the
this
plan.
P
That
has
the
uses
all
kind
of
split
up,
and
we
know
that
if
we
want
to
have
the
active
vibrant
spaces
that
we
all
envision,
that
that
housing
should
probably
be
more
integrated
throughout
the
plan.
So
I
would
just
give
that
general
comment
about
as
we're
looking
at
that
as
the
basis
and
what
are
the
potential
shortcomings
of
that
plan
and
making
sure
that
that
doesn't
constrain
our
ability
to
meet
our
the
housing
goals
that
that's.
F
So
we
absolutely
acknowledge
that
the
plan,
which
is
partly
why
we're
calling
it
makes
to
use
plan
it's
it's
sent,
obviously
more
still
that
routing
of
the
downtown
being
the
driver
of
where
the
jobs
center
is
established
by
the
city
and
the
D
SAP,
but
getting
more
housing
into
the
plan
is
very
critical
and
so
we're
absolutely
working
towards
that
which
you
will
see
reflected
in
that
late.
July
presentation,
great.
A
H
Jump
in
ago
pact,
so
thank
you
for
the
presentation.
I
just
you
know
want
to
echo
that
this
piece,
the
piece
about
affordable
housing
in
particular
for
this
support
workers
housing
a
lot
of
people
in
East
Side,
are
going
to
be
you're
working
in
the
kitchen.
Janitorial
work,
landscaping
work
and
that's
the
reality
for
it.
But
I
would
like
to
just
see.
H
You
know,
encourage
the
thought
partners
with
people
that
are
working
in
that
in
those
fields
and
really
kind
of
having
your
processes
and
your
design
of
housing
to
take
into
account
the
the
already
ongoing
displacement
of
those
families
and
individual,
and
to
that
I
know
that
we
can't
really
solve.
We
can't
boil
the
ocean,
but
if
we
were
to
follow
that
particular
piece,
a
lot
of
those
workers
have
their
own.
H
You
know,
other
parts
of
the
valley
it'd
be
really
great
to
see
what
what
Google
might
want
to
do
in
terms
of
interfacing
with
our
public
schools
in
that
area
to
to
push
up
some
of
that,
so
that
we
would
have
those
kids
also
be
considered
for
internships
and
then
also
there's
the
other
pieces,
the
culture
at
Google.
When
you
bring
in
some
of
these
kids
into
a
into
a
work
environment
that
doesn't
really
look
like
them,
speak
like
them
or
welcome
them
there.
H
There
needs
to
be
some
effort
on
the
receiving
end
of
Google
once
they're
there
that
how
do
you?
What
what
are
your
plans
and
again
having
that
conversations
with
people
how
to
make
the
culture
of
the
workplace
a
place
that
is
able
to
sustain
employment?
So
when
those
kids,
if
they
do
stay
home,
they're
able
to
support
their
parents,
they
can
stay
and
the
place
there
is
I
do
have
a
concern
that
Jennifer
brings
up
too.
H
Is
that
for
having
these
thoughtful
conversations
with
thought
partners,
it
feels
that
we're
really
driven
by
the
time
line,
rather
than
driven
by
authentic
conversations,
so
I
think
that
we
ought
to
couldn't
give
some
consideration
that,
if
a
timeline,
if
we're
gonna,
be
slaves
and
focused
just
on
that
timeline,
I'm
worried
that
these
very
important
conversations
that
hit
on
some
granular
pieces
that
are
really
important
to
give
the
data
points
for
a
really
solid
plan.
Just
are
going
to
be
made.
If
we
don't
have
that
time
to
give
to.
F
Know,
that's
very
fair,
I
think
part
of
that
is
we've
internalized.
A
lot
of
white
has
been
put
out
there
so
far,
but
we
need
to
in
that
late
July
meeting,
just
as
we
talked
about
the
intention
isn't
to
say,
here's
the
public
benefits
plan
that
we've
negotiated
a
vacuum,
and
here
it
is
it's
actually
to
also
bring
forward
in
that
session.
F
Here
are
some
of
the
ways
that
we're
thinking
of
addressing
a
lot
of
the
topics
you're
bringing
up
through
opportunity
pathways
and
the
project,
here's
how
some
of
our
initial
thoughts
around
housing
and
how
to
create
the
right
housing
ladder
and
so
forth.
So
we
can
begin
that
conversation
and
we
definitely
want
to
have
those
conversations
with
you
in
the
interim
on
a
one-on-one
or
group
basis,
or
whatever
way
we
think
is
right,
but
we
can
feel
it
out
too
I
mean
we
have
to
just
see
kind
of
as
we
as
we
go
forward.
F
What
is
the
right
process
so
completely
respected
that
we're
not
trying
to
kind
of
just
get
it
done
to
get
it
done.
We
need
to
absolutely
make
sure
it's
done
really
thoughtfully
so
and
then
Rebecca
I'm
not
sure
if
there's
anything
from
a
broader
policy
perspective
that
she
wanted
to
add
for
Google
overall
I
just.
J
Wanted
to
echo
the
echo
your
concerns
about
exposing
youth
from
all
of
San
Jose
to
stem
and
we've
posted
a
number
of
events
with
the
school
district
to
really
show
that
exposure.
We've
also
been
recruiting
from
San
Jose
State
for
years.
We're
ramping
up
those
efforts
and
we're
also
funding
a
number
of
nonprofits
to
really
develop
that
pipeline.
A
Great,
thank
you.
This
goes
back
to
what
Lori
mentioned
earlier
as
well
as
we
want
all
your
great
ideas
of
how
to
reach
every
socio
demographic
background,
the
community
John.
So
if
you
have
ideas
of
events
that
are
happening
places,
we
can
be
to
make
sure
those
voices
are
heard.
Please
let
us
know
thank
you,
so
Frank
you're
next
and
we'll
come
back
here
to
Norma.
O
That
is
exactly
what
we
don't
need
and
I
know
that
we
have
a
25
percent,
I
believe
affordable
housing,
but
a
way
for
affordable
housing
and
the
beset,
but
I
would
contend.
Not
even
that
is
enough
to
sort
of
ameliorate
our
situation,
which
I
don't
think
anybody
here
would
deny
Google
among
other
folks
in
the
tech
industry
are
directly
responsible
in
some
ways
poor.
O
O
What
are
going
to
be
the
details
on
the
housing,
the
affordable
housing
that
will
be
brought
about?
Is
it
extremely
low-income
housing?
Is
it
permanent,
supportive
housing?
Because
that's
what
we
need
so
that
two
years
from
now,
we
don't
have
double
what
we
had
in
2017
in
terms
of
homeless
population.
So
I
guess
that
that's
the
question:
are
we
willing
to
do
more
than
25%
I
know
we
have
the
money
for.
L
Yeah
I
just
want
to
start
with
again
cuz
this
MOU.
If
you
haven't
read
it,
it's
been
out
for
quite
a
while
I
just
really
encourage
you
to
read
it,
because
this
is
the
direction
from
Council
and
the
topic
you're
raising.
Is
it's
really
really
important?
So
let
me
just
say
what
it
says,
because
this
is
sort
of
our
marching
orders
from
Casa
can.
L
Thank
you
dobri,
just
for
the
benefit
of
everybody
else
that
it
says,
shared
goal,
grow
and
preserve
housing,
contribute
funding
through
a
community
benefits
contribution,
and/or
a
downtown
wide
linkage
fee
and/or,
a
financing
district
which
may
be
combined
with
other
services
to
develop
and
preserve
housing
in
the
city
to
help
address,
rising
housing
costs
and
displacement.
Housing
in
the
Deardon
station
area
should
include
on-site
units
affordable
to
incomes,
ranging
from
extremely
low
income
to
missing
middle
households
in
combination
with
market
rate
homes.
L
Affordable
units
can
be
built
both
integrated
into
market
rate
developments
and
a
standalone,
affordable
housing
projects,
the
parties
as
a
goal,
but
not
as
a
specific
requirement
on
Google
alone,
strive
for
25
percent
of
the
housing
developed
in
the
Deardon
station
area
to
be
affordable,
with
a
mix
of
affordability
levels
to
be
negotiated
in
a
future
development
agreement.
So
a
council
said
is
we
want
to
raise
our
ass
for
affordable
housing
in
the
area
as
a
whole
to
25%
Google
to
cope?
L
The
base
expectation
is
like
it
is
for
everybody
else
15%,
and
then
we
will
work
with
them
as
we
develop
the
da
to
see
how
it's
feasible
to
encourage
them
to
get
higher,
as
well
as
targeting
our
affordable
housing
resources
so
that
we
have
some
100%,
affordable
projects
in
the
Deardon
station
area.
So
the
people
in
those
projects
can
benefit
from
the
transit
and
all
of
the
amenities
are
there.
O
F
Okay,
I
think
you
need
to.
Let
us
do
the
plan,
because
the
plan
shows
how
much
commercial
we're
gonna
have
versus
residential,
which
I
there
is
a
nexus
there
and
that's.
The
commercial
linkage
goes
back
to
the
commercial
linkage
fee
conversation.
We
know
that
projects
today
if
there
are
15%,
affordable
housing
at
type
1
are
struggling
to
make
that
work.
F
We
know
we
can
do
better
than
that,
because
we
have
the
ability
to
basically
use
the
effect
of
a
commercial
linkage
feed
to
get
higher,
but
we
need
to
the
plan
partly
tells
you
once
you
see
what
the
plan
is
generating,
then
we
can
partly
say
how
high
can
we
go
because
we
know
how
much
commercial
relative
to
the
residential
rehab
and
we
can
work
through
that.
So
there's
not
a
simple
yes-or-no
for
you
today,
there's
a
let's
keep
added
together,
but
I
appreciate
the
directness
of
the
question.
Yes,
all.
A
Q
You
Norma,
Camacho,
Valley,
water
and
I
know
early
on.
We
had
a
lot
of
discussion
about
early
implementation
and
activation
of
spaces
before
the
development
and
construction
of
the
project
and
I'm
wondering
if
that's
still
on
the
table
as
well,
especially
areas
surrounding
Los,
Gatos,
Creek
and
and
if
so,
is
it
going
to
follow
or
hold
it
into
this
AI
R
process
as
well
or
is
there
an
opportunity
to
separate
some
of
those
from
the
e
IR
process?
Excuse
me
so
that
we
can
have
some
some
early
wins
early.
B
A
O
Well,
since
I've
been
here,
a
basic
regional,
swelling
minority
business
consortium
I've
been
the
overall
economic
structure
of
what's
going
on
in
our
community
and
actually
around
the
country.
This
is
why
we
have
so
much
homelessness.
It's
because
we
are
not
turning
dollars
over
in
our
communities.
We
are
where
everybody
scrap
into
to
get
as
much
as
they
can
and
stash
it
away,
and
we
have
small
businesses
not
being
involved.
O
I
was
slightly
disappointed,
maybe
more
than
slightly
disappointed
that
it
was
not
emphasized
more
in
the
report
that
we
put
out
about
using
local
and
diverse
business
communities,
their
communities
that's
been
previously
unengaged
in
these
big
development
processes.
We
have
cranes
coming
up
around
town,
which
is
a
great
thing,
but
if
it's
not
helping
the
small
businesses
around
here
is
that
we're
going
to
feel
the
impact
in
one
way
or
another.
O
If
the
dollar
says
that
can
be
turned
over
here,
it's
moved
out
and
I
think
that
our
company
has
been
in
some
conversations
with
Google
about
this
and
I
think
that
it's
a
city
we
need
to
make
put
emphasis
on
this
and
I
think
it
will
help
us
economically
and
that
will
help
impact
much
of
the
homelessness
and
much
of
the
decrease
in
our
economic
structure
around
here.
So
I
would
like
for
us
to
put
a
little
more
emphasis
on
that.
Please
great
I,
just.
B
Add
something
that
Norma
gets
back
to
the
temporary
activation,
so
we
have
started
that
discussion.
There's
no
reason
for
us
not
to
start
dealing
with
that
already
so
Ricardo's
on
it
and
we're
starting
to
look
at
how
do
we
get
active
that
and
cross
our
projects
in
the
valley?
So
that's
part
of
getting
prepared
for
the
future,
because
it
is
absolutely
something
important
that
we
got
to
focus
on.
A
G
Hi
everyone
Matt
Ramey
good
good,
to
see
you
all.
We
are
now
going
to
switch
over
to
the
D
Road
on
integrated
station
concept
plan,
so
Martin
and
Liz.
If
you
all
want
to
come
on
up,
we
have
we're
about
20
minutes
over
where
we
were
on
on
the
agenda.
One
thing
I'd
like
to
ask
for
is:
if
there
are
members
of
the
community
who
want
to
come
and
give
comments
at
public
comments,
if
you
could,
please
fill
out
a
time,
fill
out
a
card
and
bring
that
up.
G
So
we
get
a
sense
of
how
many
people
want
to
present.
So
we're
gonna
jump
in
now
to
an
actual,
very
detailed
and
and
meaty
piece
of
information.
What
we're
gonna
do
we're
gonna
do
a
presentation
first
and
then
what
we
are
going
to
do
is
first
we're
gonna.
Ask
you,
after
the
presentation
to
ask
some
questions
and
we're
gonna.
Take
all
of
the
questions.
G
R
R
Okay,
so
we
have
a
lot
to
cover
so
I'm
gonna
talk
really
fast
for
the
first
half
and
allow
Martin
to
get
into
some
content.
We
have
some
things
to
show
you
and
then,
as
matt
said,
we'll
go
back
and
we'll
do
around
a
Q&A
at
the
end.
Okay,
so
just
a
quick
reminder:
you
have
seen
this
many
many
times
for
partner
agencies
are
co-creating.
R
This
concept
plan
want
to
highlight
for
you
that
we
won't
get
everything
we
want,
but
you
will
get
more
than
you
expected
as
a
bit
of
a
mantra
that
we
are
consistently
reminding
ourselves
of
you've.
Also
seen
these
key
objectives.
Many
many
times
reminder
that
the
item
on
the
blue
list
are
sort
of
speak
to
the
conceptual
design,
principles
and
the
items
in
orange
speak
a
little
bit
more
to
organization
and
governance
items,
but
the
intent
is
bringing
keep
coming
back
to
these
objectives
as
we
go
through
our
conceptual
planning
process.
R
R
Quite
a
few
of
them
between
Rosalyn
and
the
Google
presentation
that
there's
a
lots
going
on
in
the
area,
and
so
this
this
represents
at
the
top
bar
20
19
through
roughly
2029
and
all
the
different
things
happening,
and
just
to
acknowledge
that
we
are
aware
that
there's
a
lot
to
coordinate
on
and
I
think
we're
getting
better
and
better
at
doing
that
and
I
think
in
a
couple
of
our
last
rounds
of
outreach,
we
heard
a
lot
about
well.
How
does
this
all
work
together
in
space
and
over
what
arc
of
time
right?
R
So
we
know
there's
a
lot
going
on
in
this
area
over
some
period
of
time.
It
could
be
the
next
10
years
it
could
be
beyond
that,
and
what
we've
tried
to
represent
is
some
spatial
sort
of
thinking
about
how
you
could
sequence
in
projects.
So
this
is
really
conceptual.
It's
just
to
get
us
thinking
about.
Lots
is
happening
in
a
in
a
in
the
space
at
the
same
time,
potentially
for
quite
a
long
time.
Caltrain
electrification
is
already
under
construction
and
will
be
done
in
a
couple
of
years.
We
have
the
BART
project.
R
That
is
well
underway,
as
you
know,
environmentally
cleared
and
going
into
construction
in
the
next
couple
of
years.
We
know
there
is
a
station
area
planned
implementation
and
the
Google
project
in
this
relative
vicinity.
This
is
the
D
SAP
outline,
and
then
we
have
high-speed
rail
at
some
point
coming
into
Northern
California
and
stopping
in
San
Jose,
and
then
the
integrated
concept
plan.
Again.
This
is
just
to
sort
of
help
us
think
through
as
we're
walking
through
our
conceptual
design
process.
R
R
We've
also
done
quite
a
bit
of
community
outreach
and
have
been
taking
that
input
and
putting
it
back
into
the
design
process.
I
think
what
we
find
really
and
encouraging
and
exciting
is
that
the
themes
that
are
coming
out
of
the
outreach
are
very
consistent
with
what
the
partner
agencies
are
also
thinking
about
in
terms
of
passenger
experience,
identity,
access,
connectivity,
development.
All
of
these
great
themes,
I
think
it's
wonderful
to
see
that
our
our
community
partners
are
sort
of
in
a
very
good
alignment
with
our
public
agency
partners.
R
So
the
concept
plan
process
is,
it
was
designed.
I,
don't
know
maybe
the
Dutch
way,
but
it's
a
more
iterative
sort
of
planning.
It's
very
planning
focused
right.
Sometimes
we
jump
right
into
environmental
clearance
before
we've
done
a
little
bit
of
planning,
so
we
intentionally
decided
to
start
with
requirements
and
understanding
each
other,
the
four
partners
what
they
require
and
what
their
ambitions
are.
Well.
R
We're
gonna
start
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
what
we're
calling
the
big
moves
and
the
kit
of
parts
and
again,
we've
shown
this
a
couple
times.
But
this
is
just
these
are
sort
of
the
Legos
or
the
building
blocks
that
make
an
intermodal
hub.
This
is
an
illustrative
graphic
from
a
project
in
the
Netherlands,
but
it
sort
of
represents.
You
have
to
have
a
bunch
of
ingredients
in
order
to
have
a
successful
intermodal
station,
and
so
what
we've
started
with
looking
at
again,
we
showed
you
I
guess
in
February.
R
Was
it
the
vertical
platform
position,
the
station
being
the
platform's
being
at
grey
kind
of
where
they
are
today,
or
maybe
a
little
elevated
and
station
locations
between
San
Fernando
and
Santa
Clara
Street,
with
something
on
maybe
Stover
Street,
which
is
a
bit
in
the
middle
between
San,
Fernando
and
Santa
Clara,
and
then
we
are
because
of
those
different
station
locations
affect
the
actual
heavy
rail
corridor.
So
there
is
some
considerations
around
what
we
call
the
northern
alignment,
which
goes
to
the
north
towards
the
Cal
train
maintenance
facility
and
connects
into
the
peninsula
corridor.
R
And,
of
course,
the
southern
alignment,
as
it
travels
south
points,
southwards,
towards
Tammy
and
Gilroy,
and
we
have
a
couple
of
ideas
on
how
that
southern
alignment
might
be
configured
and
so
that
items
that
we're
going
to
show
you
tonight
are
not
intended
for
anyone
to.
We
don't
want
you
to
pick
one
that
you
like.
We
want
to
talk
about
the
priorities
of
the
components
in
the
kit
of
parts
and
what
works
really
well.
R
These
are
gonna,
represent
sort
of
a
spectrum
of
things
and
the
intent
will
be
to
mix
and
match
and
optimize
to
come
up
with
the
right
layout
and
the
right
spatial
organization
for
deer
Don.
So
the
kit
aparts
includes
sort
of
everything
you
need
to
have
a
great
intermodal
station,
so
pedestrians
and
bikes
how
you
get
to
and
through
the
station.
Where
does
the
light
rail
go
relative
to
the
heavy
rail
tracks
to
the
station
entrance
hall,
the
center
of
gravity?
How
do
the
VTA
buses
sort
of
access
the
station
off
of
the
main
arterials?
R
Of
course,
it's
really
important
that
we
have
a
great
Bart
connection
for
our
new
BART
station.
We
have
lots
of
inner
city,
bus
and
taxis,
TNCs
shuttles
scooters,
hovercraft
skateboards,
you
name
it.
We
have
it
at
Daytona.
We
want
to
make
sure
there's
space
for
those
technologies,
but
emerging
technologies
that
we
haven't
even
thought
of
yet
and
then
an
airport
connector.
The
city
is
exploring
how
to
connect
the
Deardon
station
to
San
Jose
Mineta
Airport,
and
we
want
to
think
about.
Where
would
we
put
that
connection
relative
to
space
and
then,
of
course,
parking?
R
R
R
You
might
have
a
different
sort
of
transfer
connection
to
your
tax
or
your
TNC
or
your
light.
Rail,
and
so
this
is
you're.
Gonna,
see
us
sort
of
talk
through
kind
of
what
you
what
happens
when
you
mix
and
match
these
components,
there's
different
benefits
and
trade-offs
for
the
intermodal
station.
So
with
that
I'm
gonna
turn
over
to
Martin
he's
gonna
walk
you
through
our
layouts
Thank.
S
You
Liz
and
it's
a
reminder
of
the
layouts
were
showing
it
should
give
us
a
better
understanding
of
how
that
would
work
for
operations,
like
everywhere
light
rail
bus
and
also
how
it
influences
the
urban
fabric
I'm,
starting
with
a
layout
one,
which
we
are
calling
a
San,
Fernando
Street
and
every
with
every
layout
I'll
show
you
the
current
situation
with
a
zoomed
out
version
like
this,
which
is
the
rail
corridor
and
now
soom
in
a
little
more
on
the
intermodal
hub.
So
with
every
layer.
S
I'll
do
two
aspects
assume
that
one
with
the
heavy
rail
corridor
and
more
zoomed
in
around
the
intermodal
hub.
Here
you
can
see
the
station
area
today.
We've
included
street
names
as
AP
billing
and
the
rail
corridor
for
your
reference,
and
when
we
talk
about
San
Fernando
Street,
it's
an
at-grade
station.
It's
some
changes
to
the
which
we
discussed
last
time,
which
are
around
the
train
station,
which
should
facilitate
the
future
operations,
not
much
of
a
difference
to
the
north
and
the
south
alignment.
Some
changes
definitely
to
the
intermodal
up
themselves.
S
This
is
what
I
would
show
would
be
like
if
you
do
mixing
a
matching
of
the
elements
we're
choosing
now.
Let
me
zoom
in
a
little
bit
more
the
intermodal
hub
itself.
This
is
how
the
station
area
is
today
and
you
can
see
in
the
different
colors
all
the
different
modes
or
the
different
elements,
which
should
be
all
combined
in
this
way.
I
think
it's
important
to
know,
as
this
is
the
configuration
more
zoomed
in
that
all
layouts
assume
that
through
running
station,
this
means
that
currently
we
have
trains
laying
over
at
the
rental
station.
S
That
will
not
happen
anymore.
They
will
be
out
of
the
train
station
and
moving
either
north
or
south
away
from
the
train
station
itself,
and
here
you
see
the
layout
at
Great
Falls
station.
Now
let
me
take
you
through
a
one-element
to
start
with,
you
can
see
here
a
station
building.
You
see
some
note
to
it,
where
the
entrance
will
be
recessed,
that
we
have
a
concourse
underneath
the
tracks,
because
the
tracks
are
at
grade
and
you
need
access
to
the
station
from
an
underground
facility.
S
We
have
obviously
a
Bart
layout
and
with
all
layouts,
they
will
assume
the
current
corridor
as
VTA
is
planning
the
outro
roll
out
of
phase
2,
the
video
that
needs
to
be
spaces
for
VTA
buses,
intercity
buses
and
light
rail
as
well,
which
you
can
see
here
and
last,
but
definitely
not
least,
taxis,
DNC's,
pickup
and
drop-offs.
As
you
might
see,
this
is
how
it
would
all
work
together.
This
does
not
necessarily
preclude
any
development.
S
This
is
what
how
the
elements
would
look
like
together
in
one
layout,
because
the
train
station
here
and
the
tracks
are
at
great.
We
need
to
create
new
underpasses,
because
it's
a
little
wider
than
it
currently
is,
and
we
need
to
create
new
under
passes
or
overpasses
around
San
Carlos,
and
what
we
think
of
this
is
that
we
have
the
railroad
more
acting
as
a
barrier.
You
have
to
use
an
underpass
or
an
overpass
to
cross
the
tracks.
S
The
other
interesting
thing
about
this
layout
is
that
it
had
a
train
station.
Access
from
the
heavy
rail
to
Bart
is
relatively
far
away
around
two
blocks,
and
this
this
layout
might
not
necessarily
meet
all
our
ambitions
for
creating
the
next
intermodal
hub
at
Tiernan.
So
that
leads
me
to
another
layout
layout
number
two:
it's
called
Santa
Clara,
Street
and
again
I'm,
starting
with
a
zoomed
out
heavy
rail
corridor.
S
How
that
would
look
like
it's
an
elevated
train
station
and
its
center
of
gravity
is
around
Santa
Clara
Street,
which
you
can
see
here
close
to
the
ASAP
Center.
But
you
can
also
see
our
two
heavy
rail
corridors
going
south
one
along
the
existing
corridor
south
and
one
with
a
new
corridor
going
towards
along
I
to
80
87.
S
That
is
it
for
the
heavy
wheel
components.
Now.
Let
me
zoom
in
on
more
so
on
the
intermodal
hub
itself.
Here
you
can
see
the
train
station
and
also
why
we
call
it
Santa
Clara
Street,
it's
an
elevated
again
as
a
reminder
where
we
think
this
station
creates
access
to
the
west
and
to
the
east
of
this
train
station.
It
is
very
close
to
the
BART
entrance.
You
could
even
consider
something
as
a
direct
connection
from
BART
to
the
train
station
itself.
S
The
VTA
buses
are
located
around
autumn
Street,
most
of
the
buses
you
come
in,
come
south,
but
they're
definitely
also
a
lot
of
buses
using
an
east-west
connection
along
Santa
Clara
Street,
which
we'll
have
to
use
this
facility
to
turn
off
to
Santa
Clara
Street,
with
a
quick
stop
and
go
back
in
their
existing
route.
Light
Rail
is
located
at
the
station
at
grade
so
very
close
to
the
concourse.
It
makes
for
an
easy
transfer
between
light
rail
users
to
train
station
users,
if
needed,
in
which
you
can
see.
S
Also
on
the
left
of
the
image
light
rail
comes
up
along
the
elevated
structure
or
crosses
San
Fernando
and
then
goes
down
to
at
grade,
so
it
connects
to
the
train
station
at
grade.
Then
it
continues
further
along
its
current
alignment
down
into
downtown
the
next
bit
is
it's
highlighted
in
purple.
You
can
see
the
intercity
buses
along
autumn
street
also
the
taxis,
DNC's
company
shells,
pick-up
and
drop-off
also
located
around
this
autumn
street,
and
here
you
can
see
them
all
integrated
together.
S
The
next
one
is,
we
call
it
Stover
Street,
it's
Street,
not
as
well-known,
but
it's
right
there
next
to
between
kale
and
Santa
Clara.
Here
you
can
see
again
the
station
area
as
it
is
today
and
here
the
heavy
real
corridor
which
you
see
here
South,
is
that
all
trains
would
be
using
the
existing
a
real
corridor
south
and.
S
Real
corridor
North
is
slightly
changed,
I'll
zoom
into
it
a
little
bit
more
because
that
helps
here.
If
you
have
the
current
station
area
as
it
is
today,
because
we
are
shifting
the
platforms
north
because
we
would
like
to
have
a
concourse
around
1/3
to
2/3
of
the
platforms
for
good
loading
of
the
trains,
equal
loading
and
distribution
of
the
trains.
We
are
moving
the
platform's
a
little
bit
more
north.
That
does
require
a
new
alignment
up
north.
What
this
means-
and
this
also
is
necessary
for
the
other
layout-
both
this.
S
S
The
concourse
itself
is
is
a
diagonal
or
oblique,
as
we
sometimes
call
it
through
the
station,
it
so
hands
disconnects
Alameda
on
the
west
and
around
Stover
Street
to
the
east
of
the
train
station.
Something
which
we
appreciate
about
this
layout
is
that
if
you
stand
in
front
of
this
train
station
around
Stover
Street,
you
can
have
a
direct,
clear
line
of
sight
on
Santa
Clara
into
downtown.
So
there's
an
easy
way.
Finding
a
natural
way
finding
of
getting
into
downtown
as
you
want
to
exit
the
train
station,
or
vice
versa.
S
Obviously,
Bart
is
again
located
on
Santa
Clara
VTA
bus
is
here
our
bus
bays
right
at
the
front
door
of
the
station
concourse
and
they
would
use
they
would
be
off
just
off
of
Santa
Clara,
and
even
though
so
with
this
one
and
set
that
to
the
previous
one
as
well.
Here
could
be
also
development
on
top,
but
this
is
how
functionally
would
you.
O
S
You
for
that
question.
Actually
what
you
can
see
here
is
the
elevator
tracks
and
because
it's
a
sketch,
it
looks
like
it's
a
complete
embankment
of
tracks.
That
is
not
necessarily
the
case.
That
is
something
we
are
working
on.
What
actually
would
be
happening
under
the
tracks
as
again
it's
a
these
sketches
are
meant
to
give
us
an
idea
of
what
the
configuration
would
look
like
and
how
it
would
interact
with
the
urban
fabric.
S
So
that
was
a
whirlwind
of
information
for
me
in
a
very
short
amount
of
time,
but
also
to
make
sure
that
we
have
enough
time
for
your
questions.
There
was
one
more
thing,
I
want
to
discuss
with
you
before
we
started
our
presentation
with
mixing
and
matching.
Now
let
me
tell
you
one
more
thing
on
how
that
would
work
here.
We
have
an
example-
and
this
is
a
Stover
Street,
with
all
the
elements
the
honeycombs
being
picked,
which
would
form
one
layout.
S
Now,
let's
assume,
with
the
next
slide,
that
we
would
have
a
station
location
at
San
Fernando.
That
gives
us
three
options:
three
ideas
on
where
we
could
put
the
VTA
buses.
Now,
let
me
toggle
to
the
next
slide
and
we'll
put
a
station
position
on
Santa
Clara.
That
leaves
us
with
our
current
ideas
and
our
current
insights,
with
only
one
location
for
this
turn
for
the
VTA
buses.
So
this
is
what
you
would
get
what
we
mean
with
mixing
and
matching
it's
not
that
you
can
choose
anything
you'd
like
which
would
work
together.
S
R
Real
quick
reminder:
you
saw
this
in
your
last
our
last
meeting
the
evaluation
framework,
and
this
is
the
the
categories
that
we're
going
to
be
using
going
forward
to
help
evaluate
some
of
these
layouts
I
want
to
just
call
out
that
in
the
last
presentation,
community
and
environmental
were
stuck
together
as
a
single
category.
We
took
the
advice
of
our
community
partners
and
split
those
into
two
discrete
elements,
so
community
gets
more
at
neighborhood
atmosphere
and
and
that
sort
of
thing
and
environmental
speaks
a
little
bit
more
to
actual
natural
environment
type
things.
K
R
I
just
want
to
also
make
sure
and
call
out
our
public
agency
partners.
This
is
not
about
Liz
and
Martin
doing
all
this,
but
Melissa
Callie
and
Jim
Unitas
and
our
city
partners.
The
four
partner
agencies
are
here
so
I
might
call
on
them
to
help
me
answer
questions
as
needed,
because
this
is
really
their.
This
is
their
project
to
so
with
that
I
think
ready.
G
Yep,
okay,
all
right,
so
that
was
a
lot
to
chew
on
that
was
a
lot
of
information
I've
seen
that
multiple
times
and
been
through
it
and
I
see
something
different
every
time.
So
with
that
in
mind,
just
a
couple
of
quick
things.
So
this
is
not
the
one
opportunity
where
the
public
you
all
as
well
as
the
public
can
ride
comments
and
questions
on
this
there,
as
Liz
said,
there's
a
public
workshop
on
June
10th
and
another
one
on
June
15th.
The
city
is
also
offering
stakeholder
presentations,
so
they
staff
can
go
out.
G
G
R
C
G
S
G
C
I'm
Jody
starboard
from
the
Guadalupe
River
Park
Conservancy.
My
question
is
with
the
elevated
versions:
does
that
mean
that
Santa
Clara
Street
will
no
longer
have
that
deep
dip?
Will
that
be
able
to
be
eliminated
because
that's
a
super
barrier
for
pedestrians
and
bicyclists
I
also
want
to
be
sure
that
whatever
pathways
and
connectivity
that
you
have
hooks
up
to
our
trail
system,
both
at
the
low
Scouters
Creek
and
the
Guadalupe
River,
to
be
sure
that
there's
dedicated
walking
paths
and
bike
paths
for
folks
who
will
compete
commuting
that
way.
P
C
F
Real
planning
that
goes
into
it,
but
I
just
wanted
to
ask:
is
there
a
deadline
for
this
round
of
community
input,
because
that
would
be
really
good
to
know
cuz?
This
is
so
complicated
and
we
really
want
to
make
sure
we
get
you
detailed
feedback,
but
we
need
to
have
enough
time
to
discuss
with
our
members
and
get
you
something
really
thoughtful.
H
John
vertigo
packed
is
curious
if
you
have
part
of
this
conversation
as
you
build.
How
are
we
going
to
interface
with
the
on
house
community?
That's
in
different
places
in
the
in
the
area
and
the
displacement
and
where
the
folks
go
as
their
as
their
homes
are
in
that
area.
Will
it
be
going
to
the
adjacent
neighborhoods?
How
will
they
be
treated?
K
Appreciated
the
Geoffrey
Buchanan
working
partnerships
appreciated
that
equity
was
noted
as
one
of
the
community
concerns,
but
how
will
equity
be
incorporated
into
the
decision-making
process,
particularly
when
you
know?
Perhaps
it
could
be
a
part
of
access
and
seeing
the
different
options
and
thinking
about
you
know,
limited
mobility.
Folks
who
are
riding
you
know,
VTA
bus
or
VTA
light
rail
just
be
good
to
hear
how
equity
is
actually
incorporated.
C
Cathy
Sutherland
from
dumbest
park
I'd
like
to
know
if
there
are
some
hard
things
that
need
to
happen.
For
example,
moving
seem
off
is
that
a
given
that
that's
gonna
move
and
if
it's
not
a
given,
what
does
it
constrain
if
it
doesn't
move
which
of
the
layouts
provides
the
most
long-term
capacity
for
future
expansion
of
rail
services,
Theresa
Alvarado,
whisper,
Harvey.
I
Darnell
north
whoa
Glen
I
liked
the
proposal
on
Santa
Clara
because
it
created
an
elevated
track
and
to
south
heavy
relay
Oh
lines,
but
on
Stover
Street.
That
particular
one
only
shows
one.
If
you
move
seemed
off
down
south,
it
suddenly
puts
through
my
neighborhood
rather
than
20
trains
a
day
about
150
trains
a
day,
and
so
that
is
a
great
concern.
Can
Stover
be
done
with
two
lines:
South.
Q
Norma
Camacho
Valley
Water
I,
see
in
any
of
many
of
these
alternatives.
There
are
new
intersections
with
los
gatos
Creek
and
I
was
wondering
whether
or
not
any
consideration
was
given
on.
Basically,
is
this
going
to
mean
further
I
guess
covering
of
the
creek?
And
how
are
you
know?
How
are
what
is
the
impact
on
the
beyond
construction
to
the
creek
areas,
because
there
is
going
to
be
an
impact.
Q
Laura
winter
st.
Leo's
neighborhood
to
build
on
Bill
Burke's
concerned
what
would
the
height
be?
Clearly,
there
are
some
advantages
to
not
having
the
pedestrian
and
vehicular
underpasses
anymore
along
the
tracks,
but
as
the
neighborhood,
the
only
residential
neighborhood,
that
would
be
impacted
by
elevated
tracts.
That
has
some
really
big
implications.
Q
H
G
All
right,
thank
you
for
the
questions.
I
did
get
the
microphone
back,
which
facilitating
meeting
is
always
dangerous
to
let
go
of
the
microphone
so
now
you
know
this
was
again
an
experiment
to
get
everyone's
questions
first
and
because
I
think
there
might
be
multiple
overlaps
for
answers.
So
I'm
gonna
turn
it
over
to
Liz
and
let
her
try
and
answer
as
many
of
the
questions
as
she
can
and
if
anything
is
missed,
then
you
want
to
throw
out
fallout
questions
and
guide
yeah.
R
I
think
this
is
great.
I
will
start
with
I.
Think
I
said
it
last
time,
but
just
to
say
it
again.
The
the
planning
process
that
we
designed
is
intentionally
to
figure
out
kind
of
space
and
we'll
probably
end
up
asking
more
questions
at
an
answer.
So
sometimes,
if
tonight
we
can't
answer
everything.
It's
because
we
haven't
necessarily
dove
into
design
architecture,
sequel
level,
analysis.
R
We
are,
we
are
digging
into
so,
but
it's
pretty
high
level
and
we'll
get
down
into
more
details
as
we
go
along
so
I
just
want
to
kind
of
preface
it
with
that
I
kind
of
heard,
a
couple
of
buckets
of
things
that
were
asked
about
the
physical
design
of
the
elevated
tracks
and
what
maybe
happens
with
the
Caltrain
maintenance
facility
and
how
that
works.
I
heard
a
little
bit
about
kind
of
the
creeks
historic
station.
R
This
is
a
kind
of
more
nominal,
but
it
is
elevated
over.
What
it
is
today
seem
off
does
have
some
implications
depending
on
or
the
Caltrain
maintance
facility
in
two
of
the
layouts
does
move
because
of
the
northern
track
alignment
in
the
san
fernando
at
grade.
It
does
not
have
to
move,
although
I
would
say
one
of
the
important
components
and
input
into
this
process
has
been
the
Caltrain
business
plan,
which
is
looking
at
future
service
vision
for
the
peninsula
corridor,
and
so
there
may
be
things
that
are
happening
that
synergize
with
that.
R
R
Yes,
we
want
to
connect
the
station
to
pass
and
trails.
It's
a
really
important
part
of
this
at
the
access
to
the
to
and
from
the
station
through,
the
city
works
really
well
for
everybody,
and
so
we're
looking
at
ways
that
the
station
synergizes
in
itself.
So
when
you
get
to
the
station,
you
know
where
to
park
your
bike.
You
know
where
to
sort
of
go
to
catch
your
train
and
then
once
you
leave
the
station,
you
know
very
clearly
where
the
paths
are
to
points
wherever
downtown
residential
neighborhoods
point
south.
So
that's
really
important.
R
We
haven't
gotten
into
the
granularity
of
exactly
how
that's
going
to
work
and
it
feeds
into
the
downtown
transportation
plan
in
the
D
sap
process,
but
it's
a
goal
of
this
project
that
that
all
of
it
works
really
well
and
it's
very
easy,
very
intuitive
to
get
out
of
the
station
or
into
the
station
and
once
you're
there.
You
know
where
to
go.
R
Light
Rail
is
not
not
a
constraint.
It's
just
an
element
that
we
think
is
important
to
accommodate.
It's
not
being
looked
at
at
being
eliminated,
but
there's
definitely
some
interest
in
optimizing
once
it
leaves
dear
Don,
maybe
some
optimization
of
the
system,
the
VTA
system
and
I
think
the
downtown
transportation
plan.
Maybe
some
work
with
VTA
we'll
get
into
that
we're
accommodating
putting
it
somewhere
at
dear
Don,
and
so
the
options
that
we've
looked
at
can
connect.
R
R
I'm
gonna
take
land
acquisition
next
because
it
kind
of
relates
to
hard
design
items,
so
in
cost
an
implementation.
Let's
maybe
touch
on
that
a
little
bit.
So
when
we
started
this
process,
we
intentionally
we're
going
to
be
visionary
about
it.
We
did
not
want
to
throw
any
obstacles
in
maybe
some
projects
sometimes
look
at
things
like
cost
and
implementation,
as
a
potential
sometimes
can
be
a
constraint
in
itself.
R
We
intentionally
are
going
out
this
trying
to
figure
out
the
right
layouts
that
could
be
a
little
dangerous
because
it
could
be
that
we're
picking,
fairly
complex
and
expensive
items,
but
I
think
the
partner
agencies
really
wanted
to
look
at
a
bold
vision.
First,
so
we
will
be
looking
at
costs.
We
will
be
looking
at
the
costs
in
the
spectrum
of
sort
of
I.
R
Look
at
it
like
a
yelp
review
like
is
it
one
dollar
figure
three
dollar
figures,
5.5
years
to
give
a
spectrum
of
potential
cost
of
implementation,
and
we
are
starting
to
think
about
sequencing
and
construction
phasing.
We
need
to
keep
the
rail
operations
in
all
the
modes
operating
and
dirt
on,
so
that
people
can
still
use
the
station.
R
While
it's
happening,
we're
mindful
that
the
BART
project
and
the
Google
project
and
a
whole
lot
of
stuff
is
going
to
be
happening
over
a
really
long
period
of
time
and
trying
to
figure
out
the
right
ways
to
do
that.
So
you
can
either
get
in
there
and
do
it
really
fast
and
try
to
knock
it
all
out
in
a
short
period
of
time,
which
maybe
requires
some
funding
to
be
an
alignment
or
it
might
take
several
years
to
sort
of
germinate
and
sequence
it
over
time.
So
we're
thinking
about
that.
R
We
haven't
solved
that
that
equation
yet,
but
that
is
definitely
forefront
on
the
partners,
mind
to
figure
out
how
we
would
build
it.
We
don't
think
we
have
come
up
with
anything
that
is
infeasible
to
construct
it'll
just
be
kind
of
an
orchestra
and
a
dance
of
how
you
how
you
would
layer
in
new
new
major
infrastructure,
while
other
new
major
infrastructure
is
being
built.
G
D
Catch
your
breath
a
little
bit
sure
so
I
heard
what
is
the
deadline
for
feedback,
and
so
we
don't
have
a
hard
deadline,
but
I
think
that
will
be
collecting
our
feedback
through
June
on
this
round.
So
really
by
end
of
June
would
be
a
good
target
for
submitting.
You
know,
add
more
detailed
comment
letter.
If
that's
what
you're
interested
in
and
to
Jonathan's
question
about
a
neighborhood
meeting,
the
answer
is
100%.
Yes,
let's
coordinate
on
that.
D
The
easiest
way
is,
if
you
give
us
a
couple
dates
and
times
and
we'll
just
make
sure
that
it
works
with
a
few
staff
members
and
then
work
with
you
in
terms
of
you
know
where
how
much
time
we
have
what
kind
of
format
you
want
to
use
so
we're
pretty
flexible.
Typically,
they
revolve
around
the
material
we
have
like
in
terms
of
a
PowerPoint,
but
we
don't
have
to
do
a
PowerPoint
of
us,
not
what
you
want
to
do,
but.
G
Before
we
go
on,
I
just
want
to
ask
one
more
one
more
time.
If
there's
anyone
from
the
public
who
wants
to
give
a
public
comment,
we
can
we
can,
if
you
haven't,
filled
out
a
form
yet
great.
We
will
get
to
that.
We
have
some
three
people
I
just
I'm,
trying
to
judge
time.
So
we
have
the
appropriate
amount
of
time
for
public
comment
as
well
as
for
comments.
Okay,
Liz
back
back
to
you
and
then
we'll
come
back
to
all
of
you
for
some
follow-up
questions
and
comments.
R
I
missed
a
few,
the
dip
on
Santa
Clara,
that's
a
great
question.
The
intent
would
be
if
the
tracks
get
elevated,
we
do
have
an
opportunity
to
just
smooth
out
or
fix
some
of
the
roadways.
The
intent
of
the
project
is
to
connect
neighborhoods
and
connect
downtown
and
points
to
the
west,
so
the
idea
would
be
if
you're
going
to
go
in
and
rebuild
the
tracks.
We
should
probably
fix
the
roadways
and
make
it
work
really
well
and
have
a
great
pedestrian
in
street
environment.
R
Jim
I,
don't
think
I
actually
said
anything
about
land
acquisition,
I
had
started
on
that
and
I'm
lost
my
train
of
thought.
So
no,
we
haven't
looked
in
specific
detail
about
land
acquisition.
We
recognize
that
we're
showing
concepts
that
kind
of
lays
a
trail
right
on
top
of
stuff.
So
we
need
to
continue
down
the
path
and
try
to
figure
out
what
that
means
relative
to
benefits
and
trade-offs
right.
R
So
the
idea
again
is
big
vision
and
then
we're
gonna
have
to
distill
into
how
we
would
deal
with
the
impacts,
but
how
we
would
also
make
sure
in
leverage
benefit.
I
think
I.
Think
it's
important
also
say
I.
Think
in
the
partners
mind
the
idea
that
when
we
did
some
research
on
other
projects,
you
start
with
a
vision
in
overtime,
it's
going
to
mold
and
shape
morph
and
look
different,
probably
an
implementation
that
did
when
we
have
the
idea.
R
So
we
recognize
that
over
time
this
vision
is
going
to
to
mold
as
implementation
advances
right.
So
we
we
will
hopefully
build
something
that
achieves
all
the
objectives.
It
just
may
not
look
exactly
like
what
we're
showing
in
these
early
planning
phases.
So
I
think
it's
important
to
acknowledge
that,
because
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
figure
out
all
the
details
to
make
it
happen
right,
historic
station
yeah,
we
not
sure,
what's
going
to
happen
to
the
historic
station,
could
it
be
encapsulated
in
the
new
station
may?
Could
it
move?
R
Maybe
something
cool
can
happen
to
it.
We
have
to
explore
that,
but
we're
certainly
showing
that
something
is
going
to
to
change
in
that
particular
environment
and
we're
sensitive
that
that's
a
really
big
community
issue
and
we
need
to
work
on
figuring
out
what
the
right
answer
is
of
that
we
saw
I've.
Seen
train
stations
all
over
the
world
where
historic
structures
were
fully
melded
into
the
new
thing
in
a
really
appropriate
and
and
contextual
way.
So
that's
definitely
not
that
we
we
will
have
to
look.
G
P
R
I
S
Q
R
I
knew
I
was
in
there
either.
We
we
again
it's
an
important
feature.
We
did
in
the
early
sort
of
work,
look
at
major
fatal
flaws
with
the
creek
in
terms
of
some
of
the
track.
Alignments
we
showed
before
would
have
had
some
different
effects
and
we
moved
away
from
those
because
that
they
would
have
been
fairly
significant
and
we
want
to
improve
the
connection
and
utilize
that
green
corridor
haven't
gotten
into
a
lot
of
the
details
of
how
we'll
do
that.
R
R
Q
R
R
K
I'm
not
gonna
promise
a
full-blown
riot,
but
I
didn't
really
hear
an
answer
on
the
equity
question,
and
so,
rather
than
asking
the
question
again,
I'll
give
a
couple
recommendations:
we've
seen
with
VTA
as
its
planning
the
rest
of
the
downtown
stations
that
they've
actually
they're
ahead
of
even
I,
think
Deardon
and
looking
at
displacement.
Doing
a
displacement
study
and
so
I
would
encourage
the
the
partners
in
the
disk
to
to
review
that
and
then
hopefully
the
study
that
the
housing
department's
going
to
be
doing
here
and
Deardon.
K
But
the
one
way
that
I
think
the
station
can
address
displacement,
that's
different
than
say
little
Portugal
or
ory
Santa
Clara
stations,
the
inclusion
of
concessions
and
retail
I
think
gives
an
opportunity
to
look
at
as
we
create
a
joint
party.
Whatever
the
the
governing
authority
is
for
the
station.
Looking
at
a
living
wage
policy
that
ensures
folks
have
the
kind
of
wages
that
they
can
afford
to
continue
living
in
this
valley
and
hopefully
be
able
to
have
a
labor
peace
and
a
be
able
to
have
a
voice
at
work.
K
G
Thank
You
Jeffrey.
We
have
a
couple
of
minutes:
I
want
to
sort
of
open
it
up
to
see
if
anyone
not
just
has
questions
but
sort
of
comments
on
anything
that
you
saw
any
of
the
sort
of
the
vertical
platform
positions
and
whether
there
was
you
know
one
that
kind
of
jumped
out
anything
about
the
alignments
that
people
want
to
comment
and
we
about
five
minutes
just
before
we
move
on
I
think
if
there's
comments
and
and
let's
try
and
be
quick,
so
everyone
can
get
a
chance.
G
C
B
R
That's
a
good
question:
I
think
we're
gonna
follow
the
lead
of
the
city
relative
to
the
the
DSA
P,
as
well
as
the
District
parking
study
that
they're
gonna
do
I
think
that
we
need
to
kind
of
follow
that
process
so
that
we're
appropriately
looking
at
right
now
we'll
have
some
ability
to
look
at
where
we
could
put
parking.
But
we
recognize
there's
a
larger
kind
of
policy
effort
happening
with
the
city,
so
we'll
follow
their
lead
on
on
exploring.
What's
what
makes
sense
relative
to
that
kind
of
question.
C
G
R
G
C
So
it's
the
impact
of
the
traffic
of
the
ride-sharing
and
the
gridlock,
because
everybody's
heard
about
what's
going
on
in
San
Francisco,
with
their
streets
being
constantly
circled
by
these
cars
that
are
just
picking
up
people
and
delivering,
and
so
how
will
that
impact
the
neighborhoods
adjacent
to
the
station?
If
we're
going
to
be
encouraging
and
providing
a
lot
of
access
for
ride-sharing
yeah.
R
That's
a
great
question
and
something
we
need
to
explore:
visa
via
and
access
more
robust
access
planning
process
once
we
sort
of
figure
out
how
we
want
that
to
work
at
the
station,
I
think
there's
more
technical
work
to
be
done
on
exactly
that.
Question
on
impacts
and
I
think
that
those
layouts
have
different
trade-offs
relative
to
where
the
rideshare
is
located.
You
know
that
could
affect
how
how
things
move
and
dispersed
away
from
the
station.
R
G
Geoffrey,
oh
all
right,
so
we
have
has
anyone?
Is
there?
Anyone
who
hasn't
had
a
chance
to
ask
a
question
or
give
a
comment
who
wants
to
reflect
at
this
time
and
give
some
ideas?
Not
we
can
anyone,
anyone
who
has
who
wants
to
again.
I
know
this
is
again.
This
is
a
lot
of
information
to
take
in
I'd,
encourage
everyone
to
go
back
and
and
look
at
look
again
through
the
PowerPoint
and
through
the
details.
If.
G
R
Reflect
this
felt
really
fast
for
me,
as
a
presenter
I
wish,
we
could
spend
a
little
bit
more
time
digging
in
on
this
with
you,
so
I
I.
Think
if
you
have
additional
questions
or
want
more
information,
certainly
reach
out
to
Lorie,
and
we
can.
We
can
explore
and
there's
a
community
meeting
coming
up.
No
that's
another
time
commitment,
but
that's
an
opportunity
to
sit
with
us
and
spend
a
little
more
time
too.
So
thank
you
for
indulging
the
fast-talking
right.
G
M
R
C
G
A
N
I'm
here
tonight
to
talk
about
the
elephant
in
the
closet.
It's
called
climate
change
and
it's
coming.
Okay,
it's
coming
it's
coming
in
six
years.
Let's
talk
about
maybe
twelve
years
before
irreversible,
irreversible
destruction
on
our
planet.
That's!
What's
that's!
What's
on
the
agenda,
climate
change,
okay
and
you
guys
are
not
looking
at
it.
Okay,
that's
why
we're
in
the
world
to
hurt
that
we're
in
that's?
N
Why
the
you
say
we
can't
talk
to
politicians
because
they
have
caused
the
problem,
and
so
what
we
need
to
do
is
something
very
different
so
that
we
don't
go
extinct.
Okay,
that's
what
we're
dealing
with
right
now,
climate
change
and
it's
six
years
that
we
have
to
reduce
sixty
percent.
Okay,
so
I'll
give
you
a
little
hint,
because
my
husband
is
a
master
biologist.
Is
it
tell
us
what
sixty
percent
looks
like
because
that's
what
the
IPCC
says
we
have
to
do
is
reduce
drastically
sixty
percent
in
the
next
twelve
years.
N
That's
five
percent
and
economic
development
is
going
to
decline
because
only
thing
that
is
caused
economic
growth
is
fossil
fuels
and
we
have
to
stop
using
fossil
fuels.
Okay,
that's
why
I'm
here
to
tell
you
that
six
we
have
12
years,
we'll
have
five
percent
reduction
every
year.
From
now
on.
That's
my
husband
says:
five
percent
is
a
depression.
We
will
have
12
depressions
on
top
of
each
other,
okay
and
that's
what
we
need
to
do
to
reduce
our
fossil
fuel
use
to
make
a
livable
planet.
N
Maybe
we
don't
even
think
we're
gonna
have
it
it's
gone.
Okay,
we
have
lost
our
natural
habitat
and
we
can't
feel
through
fossil
fuels,
the
artificial
habitat
that
we've
developed.
So
we
need
to
change
okay,
so
we're
talking
about
60%
when
my
husband
says
as
a
master
biologist.
What
that
means
is
no
cars,
no
airplanes.
We
don't
have
wings,
we
don't
have
wings!
Oh
there's,
my
claw,
oh
I
have
to
stop
talking.
No
I
would
like
to
keep
I,
don't
know
what
that
sound
was
anyway.
What
oh,
okay,
I
could
have
another
minute.
Okay.
N
So
what
I'm
saying
is
that
one
that,
under
a
climate
emergency,
we
have
to
fix
talk
to
the
Avenue?
And
that
is
a
group
that
I'd
like
you
to
come,
because
we
are
starting
a
new
neighbors
Association
called
fixed
opt-in
Avenue.
We
need
to
not
have
bars,
go
to
Santa
Clara.
We
need
to
make
Bart,
stop
it
dear
it
on,
and
these
are
very
important
things
and
we
need
you
to
come
to
our
neighborhood
association
fix
Stockton,
Avenue,
save
the
world,
save
ourselves.
A
M
Q
Evening,
13:11
with
friends
of
Caltrain,
thank
you
so
much
for
this
very
rich
presentation.
Talking
about
a
bunch
of
options.
Two
things
to
think
about
one
is,
it
seems,
like
these
different
options,
have
very
different
implications
for
the
active
transportation
through
the
area
walking
a
biking
and
for
transfers
in
between
all
the
different
modes.
There
was
a
study
that
was
done
a
couple
of
years
ago
for
the
station
area,
showing
that
there
may
be
as
many
transfers
among
the
transit
modes
in
2040.
Q
T
T
You
know
just
in
polite
terms
that
in
developing
the
station
ideas
that
you
learn
to
develop
different
modes
of
transportation
around
the
station,
that
you
know
it's
important
at
this
time
and
that
our
emphasis
should
not
be
so
much
on
automobiles
and
its
use
of
a
fuel,
petroleum
fuel
or
fossil
fuel,
and
that
you
know
we're
starting
we're
really
at
the
time
to
think
about
different
means
of
transportation,
and
it's
exciting.
It's
hopeful
and
it's
interesting
that
that
San
Jose
is
so
dedicated
to
such
a
process.
T
A
few
other
items
I
wanted
to
mention
I
hope
that
in
talking
about
the
high-speed
rail
you
know
in
talking
we're
talking
about
design
here
are
all
designs.
I
hope
are
available
for
all
options
in
the
future
and
we
can
just
simply
be
open.
However,
it
is
to
talk
about
high-speed
rail.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
a
closed
subject.
I
hope
that
we
can
talk
about
the
different
uses
of
a
mixed
income.
Housing
I
think
that's
become
an
interesting
topic
here
in
San
Jose
that
we're
developing
amazingly
well.
T
That
I
hope
we
could
talk
about
more
and
that
workers
rights
and
that
working.
You
know
how
to
establish
work
standards
in
San
Jose
for
all
of
San
Jose.
The
culture
of
San
Jose
can
be
talked
about
more
here
at
the
Google
process,
and
you
know
I
I
wanted
to
respect
the
the
people
who
demonstrate
here
and
I
hope
you
can
too
and
not
feel
fearful
of
them,
and
that
we
work
for
peace
at
this
time
as
we're
possibly
heading
towards
war,
don't
be
fooled
by
a
pretty
strong
worth
right
now.
Thank
you
appreciate.
T
So
so,
first
of
all,
I'd
like
to
thank
Harvey
for
is
a
egret
plan,
because
I
believe
we
should
have
a
year-round
Egret
season
and
it's
a
plan
that
the
Chiefs
eliminates
conflict
between
pedestrians
and
vehicle
traffic
and
I
believe.
The
only
way
to
achieve
this
is
to
elevate
the
people's
space
above
the
street
and
end
tracks.
Just
like
the
Stratford
City
station
London
and
the
brand-new
high-speed
rail
station
in
Hong,
Kong
I
suggest
you
go
in
and
Google
it
that
takes
care
of
the
buses,
the
taxis
and
the
right
chase.
T
All
the
conflicts
are
gone
72
up
right,
so
Kathy
brought
this
up.
What
happened?
Okay
on
this
one,
you
still
see
the
historical
building,
maybe
so
next
one
over
then,
because
on
every
plan
I've
looked
at
okay
boom,
it's
gone
right,
so
you
have
to
start
at
the
station
and
then
the
tracks
and
then
everything
else
that
station
is
not
ago
Strobel.
If
you
don't
understand
what
the
expectation
is
go
to
the
spare
office
and
have
a
good
old
look
at
what
Kings
Cross
station
looks
like
that's
what
we're
the
expectation
is
frayed.
T
T
How
can
you
possibly
elevate
the
light
rail
and
go
under
the
tracks?
The
light
rail
station
yeah
and
that's
when
you
see
the
box
needs
to
go
in
the
same
box
as
the
concourse
and
Bart,
just
like
their
station
Market
Street,
San
Francisco
and
in
closing
my
advice
to
the
ABC
team
is
to
get
their
house
in
order
as
soon
as
possible,
because
we
have
a
new.
T
B
I've
got
a
question
for
basically
the
city:
how
far
basically
down
down
will
the
IR
impact
go?
Will
it
go
down
at
Amiens
station
or
further
south
than
that?
You
question,
because
what
what
you're
doing
essentially
on
that
this?
If
you
don't
look
at
where
the
impact
of
it
is
you're,
going
to
impact
it
later
in
the
future,
so
in
other
words,
what
looking
at
is
the
idea
of
future
proofing.
B
If
we
fruit
you-
and
if
you
don't
do
that,
you're
gonna
basically
wipe
out
probably
the
entire
one
side
of
Jerome
in
Gardner
the
other
side.
You
need
to
take
a
look
at
just
take
a
look
at
what's
happening
with
VTA
right
now.
The
typical
the
subsidy
that
VTA
has
had
is
over
$22
per
person
every
time
they
are
there
going,
because
what
happens
is
right
now
we
are
subsidizing.
B
Ninety
percent
of
the
operating
costs
of
ETA
is
subsidized
by
the
taxpayers
at
some
point
in
time
the
taxpayers
are
gonna
say
we
don't
want
to
do
this
anymore,
and
so,
therefore,
you
ought
to
take
a
look
at
what
is
going
to
happen
with
DJ
in
the
future,
because
right
now
is
split
between
on
the
light,
rail
side
and
buses
and
also
road
maintenance.
So
it's
there's
an
idea.
You
go
take
a
look
at
and
how?
Why
are
they
going
to
continue
at
some
point?
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Add
our.
Q
Hi
there
I
had
a
suggestion
for
a
community
engagement,
a
different
kind
of
forum
and
my
suggestion.
The
genesis
for
this
is
that
I
think
it
needs
to
be.
The
information
tonight
was
very
dense
and
if
you
haven't
read
all
the
reports
is
really
hard
to
follow
and
it's
not
very.
The
information
is
not
easily
accessible
or
democratized
for
a
lot
of
people
who
don't
have
the
vernacular
to
understand
this,
and
so
suggesting
I
had
was
if
we
could
maybe
host
a
meeting
at
the
San
Jose
improv.
Q
So
if
it
was
a
two-night
event,
it
could
be,
one
could
be
in
English,
one
can
be
in
Spanish
and
there
can
be
a
live
audience
participation
via
there's
an
app
called
Kahoot
and
you
can
do
live
surveys
where
it
projects
on
the
screen,
and
you
can
ask
questions
like
what
is
the
preferred
transportation
mode
for
ten
years
from
now
for
Millennials
like
what
do
we
want
to
be
doing?
Do
we
want
more
VTA
or
do
we
want
more
Caltrain
or
better
bike
lanes?
Q
And
then
there
can
also
be
a
live
stream
streaming
aspect
and
the
feedback
and
the
survey
can
be
expanded
even
more
through
those
channels
and
also
in
making
the
suggestion
I,
don't
think
it's
fair
to
just
lay
it
all
in
one
person.
So
I
would
ask
that
it
should
be
a
team
effort,
and
if
there
is
anybody
at
sag
in
this
committee
who
are
willing
to
help
Lorri
kind
of
put
together
this
community
meeting
or
just
brainstorm
different
styles
of
community
meetings.
A
D
So
the
next
few
meetings
for
the
advisory
group-
these
are
the
tentative
topics
and
tentative
timing.
We'll
try
to
get
these
on
your
calendars
as
soon
as
possible.
As
you
can
plan
around
it.
I
know.
July
particularly,
is
a
rough
month,
but
we
will
and
to
provide
updates
on
Google's
mixed-use
plan
at
both
July
and
September.
D
They
already
give
you
an
indication
of
what
they're
hoping
to
show
at
those
times,
we're
also
planning
to
provide
an
update
on
that
citywide
and
anti
displacement
strategy
at
the
next
meeting
and
then
come
back
in
September
for
the
fourth
round
of
a
concept
plan
outreach
where
we'll
continue
to
refine
these
layouts
and
come
back
with
you
at
that
time
and
then
November.
The
intention
is
to
have
a
kickoff
round
for
the
D
sap
amendment
and
Google
project
review
process.