►
From YouTube: JUL 9, 2018 | Station Area Advisory Group
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
Okay,
okay,
so
as
we
mentioned,
this
is
our
agenda
for
tonight.
Summary
notes
as
usual.
Give
you
a
quick
update
on
engagement
process
and
the
TED
talk
that
we
did
have
planned.
As
we
mentioned,
is
not
going
to
happen
tonight.
Most
likely
we
have
in
the
next
meeting.
It
probably
will
have
some
connection
to
housing
and
jobs
which
we're
gonna
do
a
report
back
on,
so
that
work
out
well,
we're
gonna.
Do
a
report
back
on
these
three
topics.
B
Well,
really
want
that
to
be
more
of
a
discussion
for
you
all,
so
we'll
make
sure
we
leave
plenty
of
time
to
discuss
what
came
out
of
those
discussions
with
the
solution
groups,
and
then
we
have
public
comment
as
usual,
and
the
upcoming
meeting
scheduled
SOG
agreements
I'm
not
going
to
go
over
these
again
because
you
all
again
have
been
fantastic
but
just
remember
to
stay,
open-minded,
be
respectful
and
have
fun.
So
a
quick
review
of
the
last
SOG
meeting
just
to
make
sure
we
got
all
right.
B
As
you
all
know,
the
focus
of
that
meeting
was
mainly
about
the
TED
talks.
We
had
many
SOG
members
present
their
mission,
fears
and
aspirations.
Much
focus
was
on
housing.
As
we
kind
of
expected.
We
did
have
a
discussion
about
that.
Other
topics
that
include
historic
preservation,
Los
Altos,
Creek,
Trail
and
daylighting
Guadalupe
Park
River,
the
role
of
the
San
Jose
State,
University,
local,
local,
neighborhoods,
regional
perspective,
community
benefits
agreements
evaluating
projects
through
the
lens
of
the
dignity
of
working
families
and
the
potential
impacts
of
high-speed
rail
on
the
gardner
neighborhood.
B
So
those
are
the
TED
talks.
We
had
a
report
out
on
the
housing
solution.
Group
again
it
was
a
very
preliminary
report
just
to
give
you
a
high-level
sense
of
what
was
talked
about
again.
The
meeting
is
tomorrow
to
dive
a
little
bit
deeper
and
to
talk
through
some
of
those
potential
solutions
and
outcomes
and
how
prioritize
those
so
very
quick
snapshot
there.
What
we
talked
about
anything
that
might
have
been
missed
or
anything
you
all
want
to
talk
about-
that.
B
We
didn't
cover
here
that
was
happened
last
week
know
our
week
and
a
half
ago.
It
feels
like
yesterday,
so
the
engagement
process
update.
We
just
want
to
give
you
a
very
quick
snapshot.
We
did
go,
have
four
forms
very
well
attended,
as
we
talking
about
last
time
we're
putting
those
into
a
summary
we're
also
summarized
in
a
pop-up
workshop
or
two
that
we
we're
also
planning
pop-up
workshops
coming
up
either
the
end
of
this
month
or
early
next
month.
B
We're
also
going
to
be
distributing
a
survey,
hopefully
this
month
as
well,
a
mobile
survey
that
we
talked
a
little
about
in
the
past
and
we're
also
gonna
be
doing
some
stakeholder
meetings
with
groups.
So
all
that
is
coming
and
we're
also
hoping
to
have
that
FAQ
available
by
the
end
of
this
week,
and
that
will
be
emailed
out
to
all
you
already
put
up
on
the
website
for
everyone
to
have
access
to
I'm,
really
covering
a
lot
of
the
questions.
B
We've
been
hearing
throughout
this
process,
to
give
you
a
visual
tool
and
definitely,
if
there's
any
questions
that
come
up
from
that.
Please
definitely
let
us
know
and
we'll
have
Laurie's
email
address
available
for
that,
so
tedtalk
not
going
to
happen
close
your
eyes.
You'll
see
this
maybe
next
week.
Okay,
so
report
backs
we're
gonna
go
ahead
and
get
started
with
those
again.
We're
gonna
give
a
very
quick,
high-level
introduction,
giving
a
summary
of
what
was
heard.
B
We
really
want
to
open
it
up
for
a
discussion
with
you
all
so
we're
gonna
start
with
Kim,
and
the
report
out
I'll
cover
this
real,
quick,
so
again,
very
high-level,
just
maybe
the
shared
understandings
and
the
desired
outcomes
that
came
out
of
those
groups.
We
want
to
discuss
really
what
those
overlaps
are.
We
sense
it.
There
is
a
lot
of
overlap
between
the
different
topics,
so
we're
gonna
start
to
talk
about
that
a
little
bit
today
and
really
kind
of
work
and
not
necessarily
working
toward
consensus.
B
C
Thank
you,
everybody
I
am
Kim
Kim
Hollis,
deputy
city
manager,
and
it
was
really
a
pleasure
to
be
able
to
work
with
this
group,
which
has
was
a
small
group
of
awesome
people,
and
we
had
a
really
long
name
parks,
public
space
sustainability
and
neighborhood
quality
of
life
and
I'm.
Just
gonna
read
the
names.
If
you
could
just
raise
your
hand
just
so.
C
Everybody
here
has
a
sense
of
who
was
in
the
group,
so
Harvey
Darnell,
Norma,
Camacho,
Therese,
Alvarado,
saunter,
Weber,
Edwards,
Psalms,
fuzzy,
Hamilton,
Phil,
Souders,
Cathie,
Sutherland
Laura
winter,
and
we
had
math
from
Greenbelt.
Add
that
everybody
in
the
group
and
we
had
a
robust
audience
and
watch
both
both
of
our
meetings.
So
you
have,
you
should
have
in
front
of
you
the
summary
of
the
our
work
product
that
we
put
together
and
I
just
find.
C
If
you
hit
on
a
few
highlights-
and
my
goal
is
just
to
summarize
the
main
points
from
the
group
and
then
after
that
I'll
ask
the
group,
if
there's
anything
that
you
want
to
add
in
terms
of
you
know,
adding
any
flavor
to
it
and
then
we're
happy
to
take
any
questions.
So
we
had
some
high-level
overall
themes.
C
The
first
was
that
how
important
it
was
to
take
a
cohesive
and
holistic
approach
to
public
space
planning
over
this
entire
area
and
to
avoid
a
piecemeal
approach.
We
saw
a
huge
opportunity
here
for
really
attractive
usable,
active,
inviting
accessible
to
all
public
spaces
that
are
well
connected
to
each
other.
C
We
saw
opportunities
to
take
things
that
are
currently
issues
and
problems
for
the
people,
especially
people
that
are
in
this
neighborhood
or
pass
through
it
and
to
turn
them
into
innovative
solutions
and
new
strategies,
and
particularly
the
opportunity
to
take
areas
that
are
today
experienced
as
problematic
or
unsafe,
or
dead
zones
and
really
turn
those
around
into
attractive
spaces.
And
then
the
high
level
last
high
level
idea
was
that
the
Deardon
station
area
really
becomes
a
dynamic,
world-class
regional
hub.
C
So
the
first,
as
you
might
expect,
is
parks
and
open
spaces,
and
the
two
key
points
were
really
looking
for
a
range
of
different
kinds
of
public
spaces,
including
perhaps
some
innovative
kinds
of
public
spaces
like
rooftops:
Plaza
parks,
pocket
parks,
linear
parks
and
then,
secondly,
the
emphasis
on
well-designed
and
well-maintained
public
spaces
that
was
hit
over
and
over
again,
the
example,
perhaps
of
the
rotary
play
garden
in
terms
of
high
quality
design,
high
quality
maintenance.
The
second
main
topic
was
connections
and
trails,
and
it
was
very
interesting.
This
group
said
many
many
times.
C
The
issue
is
not
that
we
need
new,
large,
open
spaces.
We
have
many
of
those
in
and
around
this
area.
Our
main
issue
is
the
connections
to
the
existing
amenities
and
assets
in
the
area,
especially
connections
by
bike
and
walking.
So
you
see
the
theme
here
range
of
desirable
bike,
pedestrian
options,
including
off
street
trails
and
multi-purpose
Greenfingers.
Now
you
might
wonder
what
a
green
finger
is.
I
did
too
and
then
I
recalled
in
the
original
geodon
Station
area
plan
I'm
going
to
send
this
around.
C
There
was
this
notion
of
these
green
fingers,
which
were
really
pedestrian
connections
that
were
attractive
and
that
connected
larger
public
spaces
to
neighborhoods
and
smaller
spaces,
so
I'm
just
going
to
for
you
to
take
a
look
at
a
lot
of
emphasis
on
connecting
to
downtown
to
Willow
Glen
to
other
nearby
neighborhoods
and
to
the
Regional
Park
and
open
space
network,
and
that
especially
the
Guadalupe
River
and
the
Lost
graddic
gadot's.
Creek
trails
can
really
become
jewels
within
the
open
space
system.
C
C
From
the
very
beginning,
the
group
envision
artwork
that
is
permanent,
but
also
some
artwork,
that
might
change
over
time
or
be
of
a
temporary
nature
and
that
it's
not
just
about
the
physical
heritage,
but
that
historic
populations
who
have
lived
and
worked
in
the
area,
such
as
the
Aloni
or
other
significant
figures,
should
also
be
acknowledged
and
respected.
The
third
main
topic
area
it
was
impacts
to
existing
neighborhoods.
C
So
we
talked
about
the
appropriate
interface
needing
to
happen
between
higher
density
buildings
and
existing
neighborhoods
there's
some
concerns
about
noise
pollution,
especially
in
the
Delmas
area
that
need
to
be
understood
better
and
some
problem-solving
around
that
there's
a
lot
of
interest
in
early
activations
of
public
space,
which
could
be
a
variety
of
things.
But
let's
start
now:
let's
not
wait.
C
10
or
15
years,
the
expectation
of
to
the
extent
possible
there
will
be
mitigation
for
the
increased
traffic
impacts
that
will
come
from
more
development
and
more
transit
service
in
the
areas
and
a
lot
of
openness
to
continue
to
collaboration
on
new
new
modal
strategies,
which
includes
things
like
scooters
and
bike
share
and
different
ways
of
moving
around.
Then.
The
last
main
topic
area
is
funding
and
partnership
strategies.
C
The
group
sees
opportunity
for
very
strong
partnerships
with
the
nearby
neighborhoods,
especially
that
could
start
now.
People
from
those
neighborhood
said
we'd
be
very
interested
in
volunteering
and
organizing
to
take
better
care
of
the
places
that
we
have
now
and
there
was
actually
people
from
the
parks
department.
Who
said
you
know
we'll
take
you
up
on
that.
So
there
were
some
good
connections,
so
the
idea
of
leveraging
existing
neighborhood
involvement,
neighborhood
or
corporate
or
other
volunteers,
and
really
seeking
some
big
partners
in
corporate
and
and
philanthropy
to
make
this
happen.
C
So
those
were
the
desired
outcomes.
And
then
the
group
came
up
with
a
long
list
of
the
10
Solutions,
okay
and
actually
decided
to
use
Survey
Monkey
and
to
to
rank
the
solutions
that
they
came
up
with,
but
the
first
thing
that
they
did
was
they
divided.
They
had
nearly
forty
solutions,
so
we
had
a
lot
of
great
brainstorming.
We
divided
those
into
two
categories,
so
the
first
category
we
called
major
capital
solutions.
These
are
the
things
that
would
require
very
significant
investment
and
very
significant
lead
planning,
time
and
implementation
time.
C
We
had
eight
of
those,
and
so
we
had
most
of
the
members
I
think
not
nine
of
you.
Every
most
most
people
are
able
to
vote,
and
what
you
see
on
the
slide
here
is
these
are
the
top
five
major
capital
solutions
in
terms
of
the
group's
initial
prioritization,
so
they
include
making
sure
that
there's
a
Deardon
central
plaza,
that's
a
signature
plaza
which
they
envisioned
on
Santa
Clara
Street.
C
Number
four:
better
connections,
so
that
the
existing
residents
and
visitors
can
get
to
the
existing
parks
and
open
spaces
that
are
already
there
and
are
very
underutilized.
The
people
who
live
there
feel
isolated
from
the
amenities
that
are
there,
because
the
connections
are
not
great
and
then
number
five
make
the
to
a
t-bird
overpass
safe,
safer
for
walkers
bikers
include
children.
We've
talked
about
that
one
before
so.
Those
are
the
top
five
major
capital,
and
then
we
had
over
25
other
ideas
that
we
called
nearer
term
solutions.
C
So
these
are
things
that
are
less
expensive
and
could
be
implemented
earlier,
and
what
you
see
on
the
slide
here
are
the
ideas
that
got
at
least
three
votes
each.
So
this
was
our
natural
break
point,
so
the
first
one,
a
lot
of
interests
in
saving
and
showcasing
the
set
of
neon
and
historic
signs
that
were
from
San
Jose
businesses.
C
Roughly
from
the
late
forties
into
the
early
70s,
the
Stevens
meat
market
dancing
pig
is
that
sign
is
the
one
we
we
all
know
of,
but
there
are
a
number
of
others
and
a
reflective
of
that
era
and
there's
interest
in
preserving
them
and
perhaps
showcasing
them
in
the
Deardon
area.
Number
two
solution
again
here.
You
see
this
constant
theme
of
improving
key
pedestrian
and
bicycle
connections,
including
under
the
87
freeway
into
the
downtown
core
to
areas
like
the
Children's
Discovery
Museum,
really,
but
all
around
really
three
360
around
dear
Don.
C
Third,
a
lot
of
interest
in
employing
early
activation
in
programming
for
residents
and
I
would
say
and
visitors
right
throughout
the
planning
and
construction
phases,
and
there
were
a
lot
of
great
ideas
here
about
pop-up
retail
food
trucks,
kids
activities,
maybe
even
virtual
reality-
experiences
where
people
could
go
to
dear
Don
and
and
understand
what
the
history
was
and
also
what
it's
going
to
look
like
in
the
future.
And
the
fourth
was
the
importance
of
developing
a
comprehensive
list
of
historic
resources
in
the
Deardon
area.
C
So
we
can
make
sure
to
pay
attention
and
preserve
those,
and
then
last
we
had.
We
had
a
set
of
ideas
that
were
really
good
ideas,
but
to
to
us.
When
we
looked
at
the
groups
product,
they
seemed
like
they
were
guiding
principles
for
new
development,
whether
it's
Google
development
or
other
development
in
the
dirt
on
station
area.
C
We
have
scary,
problematic
spots
because
we
didn't
give
this
too
much
thought
in
the
past.
So
let's
try
to
avoid
those
dead
zones
through
better
design
and
other
methods.
Six
scale
new
development
appropriately,
where
it
interfaces
with
existing
development,
seven
use
the
nearby
neighborhoods
as
test
beds
for
new
ideas.
Eight
ensure
that
new
buildings
provide
more
eyes
on
the
new
and
existing
parks,
don't
bury
or
hide
the
parks
in
public
spaces
and
nine
integrate
open
spaces
into
places
where
people
will
and
do
live
and
work
currently,
and
will
do
more
so
in
the
future.
C
So
so,
just
to
conclude,
we
had
a
lot
of
I
think
good
agreements
in
this
group
about
what
was
important
and
some
consistency
with
work
that
had
been
done
in
the
past
through
the
good
neighbor
committee
and
the
Deardon
station
area
plan,
so
some
validation
of
that
and
then
some
movement
into
some
new
directions.
So
so
that
concludes
the
overview
and
I
think
what
I'm
supposed
to
do
next.
Is
we
like
to
open
it
up?
Maybe
first
to
other
members
of
the
members
of
the
committee?
D
This
regionally
significant
hub
here
in
ways
that
might
also
be
able
to
be
connected
to
some
of
the
mitigation
needs
of
the
project
itself.
Likelike
VMT,
another
environmental
impact,
so
I
think
that
sense
of
seeing
this
as
a
regional
grounding
point
that
connects
to
many
other
amenities
at
the
local
and
larger
scale
is,
is
mostly
captured
here
and
just
want
to
emphasize
that,
as
we
move
forward
great.
E
Yes,
the
the
four
neighborhoods
surrounding
the
project
sent
a
letter
to
the
council
members
and
the
mayor
about
two
weeks
ago,
unanimously
saying
that
we
wanted
it
the
routing
of
the
high-speed
rail
around
neighborhoods,
so
as
to
avoid
taking
parks
and
taking
homes.
So
I
want
to
reflect
it
not
only
in
the
transportation
group,
but
also
in
this
one
note.
C
E
The
other
thing
is
I,
just
this
is
a
logistic
question.
I
didn't
see
the
original
Survey
Monkey
request
and
when
I
saw
the
results,
I
went
out
and
I
did
the
survey
Mike
and
I
sent
Laurie
a
an
email,
and
she
said:
oh
well,
you
know
I
couldn't
see
who
voted
well.
Aren't
we
under
Brown
Act,
and
so
that
voting
probably
is
a
problem
under
Survey
Monkey.
If
it's
anonymous.
G
Thank
You
hours
from
these
cinoxate
downtown
residents
Association
and
things
I,
just
like
to
emphasize
a
few
things
if
I
may
from
the
conversation,
so
you
did
a
good
job
of
summarizing
Kim.
When
we
talk
about
doing
fingers,
I
just
want
to
remind
everyone
that
we
were
also
talking
about
possible
continuation
of
the
Paseo
because
it
stops
at
Cesar
Chavez.
So
if
it
continued
all
the
way
down
to
dear
Don,
that
could
be
a
big
win.
G
The
other
thing
is
when
we
talk
about
the
interface
between
the
old
neighborhoods
and
the
high
density,
neighborhoods
I
would
like
to
make
sure
and
I've
said
this
before
that
we're
taking
advantage
of
some
of
the
work,
that's
already
being
done
around
life.
So
you
know
it's
the
space
between
the
buildings,
so
let's
not
lose
sight
of
the
work,
that's
always
being
done
there
and
then.
Finally,
the
emphasis
on
bigger
partners
in
the
project.
Overall,
it's
not
just
going
to
be
Google
who
is
going
to
be
bringing
their
treasure
and
talent
to
the
area.
C
C
C
H
San
Jose
is
updating
its
downtown
design.
Guidelines
and
I
think
it's
important
to
incorporate
there
in
urban
design
standard
for
buildings
that
are
adjacent
to
the
river
park,
to
take
full
advantage
of
those
park
assets
and
make
sure
that
they're
providing
public
access
to
those
resources.
As
well
and
to
this
point
about
the
High
Line
requiring
that
development
along
parks
and
contribute
to
ongoing
operation
and.
H
I
Kathy
Sutherland
with
Delmas
Park-
and
this
is
one
of
those
small
things
but
I
think
it
makes
a
huge
difference.
Public
restrooms
in
parks
are
essential,
I
think
that's
one
of
the
the
best
things
that
happens
at
the
rotary
play
garden
is
there
are
safe
public
restrooms.
So,
as
we
start
looking
at
Park
space
within
these
large
areas,
I
think
that
needs
to
be
one
of
the
things
that's
considered.
J
The
summary
one
thing
that
I
wanted
to
mention
come
the
context
that
had
us
bring
up.
The
idea
of
the
variety
of
scales
was
obviously
the
current
plan,
as
the
fire-training
facility
was
a
rigid
destined
to
be
a
large
park,
and
one
thing,
we're
kind
of
two
of
our
points
came
together
was
it's
enough
that
we
need
substantial
large
parks.
There
are
substantial
large
parks
all
around
access
to
those
is
just
as
important
and
then
therefore,
okay,
we're
not
going
to
get
a
single
large
park
within
deer
Don.
J
B
I,
don't
think
I
see
anyone
else
from
that
group
with
the
card
up.
Should
we
shift
now
to
the
larger
group,
if
you
all
have
any
specific
issues
or
concerns
or
the
points
of
areas
or
want
to
make
any
additions.
This
would
be
your
chance
to
do
that
before
I
move
on
to
the
transportation
group.
So
anyone
have
any
input
there.
F
K
We'll
start
with
you,
yep
yeah,
Jeff
Buchanan,
with
working
partnership,
CEO,
say
so
in
terms
of
the
exploration
of
funding
sources.
I
think
it's
it's
important
to
note.
Staff
is
already
doing
some
good
work.
Looking
at
funding
for
infrastructure
infrastructure
fee
for
commercial
development,
for
instance,
so
it'd
be
good
for
I.
Think
the
notes
of
this
group
to
reflect
you
know,
there's
that
ongoing
staff
work
and
I
think
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
connect
some
of
these
big
capital
projects
on
the
on
the
list
here,
possibly
to
that
funding
source
going
forward.
K
So
I
encourage
that
and
then
just
as
we
think
about
residential
development
in
the
area.
Certainly,
in
the
downtown
area
we've
seen
a
number
of
fee
breaks
for
parks,
given
this
kind
of
weighty
list
of
capital
improvements
to
the
park
system,
I
think
we
may
want
to
consider
recommending
that
we
don't
extend
those
kinds
of
fee
breaks
to
you
know
additional
developments
going
forward,
particularly
in
the
Deardon
area,
given
the
kind
of
significant
expectations
for
a
park
development
in
the
area.
K
B
L
Development
I'm,
the
city's
dirt
on
project
manager
and
I'm,
filling
in
for
Lauren
Haley
who's
excited.
She
was
going
to
go
Ohio
in
the
summer,
and
so
you
get
me
instead
and
I
was
I
will
know
just
for
the
record.
I've
done
this
for
years,
I
ended
up
following
Kim
in
presentations
and
I
hate.
It
she's
much
more
engaging
than
I.
So
she
was
good
and
had
the
names
of
everybody
that
was
on
their
group
raise
introduced
themselves
and
she
read
that
so
I'm
gonna
go
the
other
way
and
say.
L
L
L
The
main
takeaway
is,
there
is
a
tension
between
enough
success
and
enough
density
so
that
you
get
the
volumes
of
people
moving
through
competing
with.
What
do
you
do
with
the
volumes
of
people
that
are
trying
to
move
through
the
area
in
cars?
Another
means
of
transportation,
and
that
also
then
leads
to
the
next
discussion
or
the
next
topic
is
when
you
do
about
the
need
for
parking.
Surprisingly,
arena
was
interested
in
parking,
and
anyway,
we
have
a
big
discussion
is
about
how
many?
How
do
you
write
size,
parking
and
I?
L
Think
that's
one
of
the
ongoing
discussion
topics
that
there
will
be
going
forward.
I.
Think
it's
important
as
well,
though
we
think
about
a
constant
theme,
both
in
the
and
the
prior
group,
and
this
is
the
ability
to
have
connections
in
to
and
through
the
area,
not
just
for
cars
and
other
and
a
buses
or
whatever,
but
for
people
and
normal
people
in
all
ways
shapes
and
form.
L
It's
critical.
This
whole
issue
of
bike
and
pedestrian
connections
is
an
essential
part
of
the
transportation
program
and
through
the
dirt
on
station.
It
was
reiterated
multiple
times
by
all
of
the
committee
members
in
the
public,
that
this
is
an
area
that
we
really
wanted
to
be
able
to
focus
on,
take
advantage
of
the
green
figures
that
showed
up
in
the
last
presentation
and
that
show
up
as
part
of
the
dirt
on
plan
and
really
find
a
way
to
enhance
the
experience
for
people
moving
through
the
area
and
to
the
area.
L
Tremendous
concern
about
safety,
especially
as
volumes
of
traffic
begin
to
rise
up
and
also
the
existing
conditions
of
people
moving
through
neighborhoods.
You
will
hear
again
a
lot
of
concern
about
people
having
English,
especially
children,
having
to
move
across
interstate
280
to
access
recreational
facilities
and
schools.
How
do
we
solve
that?
It's
part
of
the
transportation
problems
as
much
as
it
is
parks
and
open
space
and
other
other
uses
that
have
to
go
into
the
solution
and
then
again,
as
I
said
parking
that
I
think
the
big
takeaway
is
we
want
to
right-size
it.
L
We
want
to
build
the
right
amount
of
parking
so
that
there
is
successful
that
we
don't
damage
the
neighborhoods
that
are
abutting
it,
but
we
don't
want
to
build
so
much
parking
that
the
transit
never
gets
used
again:
traffic
congestion
or
circulation.
There's
not
much
more
to
say
this
other
than
it's
that
we
want
to
pay
attention
to.
We
don't
want
to
build
more
Road
capacity.
It's
like
building
freeways.
You
don't
want
to
just
keep
building
lanes
of
traffic.
L
L
We
don't
want
to
do
is
just
have
people
blow
through
the
area.
We
don't
want
people
to
just
rush
through
the
area,
but
by
building
wardrobes.
We
want
people
to
actually
use
it
and
become
part
of
the
neighborhood
transit
is
a
critical
part
of
what
we're
going
to
be
doing
in
the
area,
and
it
just
needs
to
be
well
coordinated
and
well
funded.
L
L
The
cleverness
of
technology,
looks
for
alternative
ways
to
move
people
around
and
some
of
those
alternate
routes
end
up
moving
people
through
residential
neighborhoods,
and
we
want
to
avoid
those
sorts
of
impacts
and
impacts
of
new
development
on
the
on
the
abutting
neighborhoods
and
with
that
I
will
turn
it
over
to
of
the
members
of
the
Solutions
Group
to
provide
their
and
putting
anything
that
I
missed.
In
my
very
brief
statements,
I'm
better
than
I
thought
it
was
Harvey.
E
Again,
you
know
this
is
not
as
much
aimed
towards
the
MOU
as
towards
the
later
project
with
the
high-speed
rail,
but
we
want
to
make
sure
that
any
alignment
of
the
high-speed
rail
does
not
close
off
the
intersections
of
Oz
or
a
West
Virginia,
and
also
have
any
impact
on
taking
of
houses.
Make
sure
that
is
highlighted.
E
L
M
Leslie
personally
about
Silicon
Valley
at
home,
I
just
wanted
to
mention
a
few
things
again.
You
said,
there's
overlap
and
there
was
a
little
overlap
between
this
and
the
next
next
group
that
you
you
will
be
talking
about,
but
I
wanted
to
focus
on
the
future
proofing,
which
I
think
is
really
important,
because
parking
right
now
we're
parking
for
today
and
tomorrow's
gonna
be
different.
M
We
just
don't
know,
what's
going
to
happen
with
driverless
cars
and
and
other
things,
and
so
having
that
plan
for
some
adaptive,
reuse
is
really
important,
and
the
other
thing
that
I
would
suggest
is
is
looking
at
ways
to
encourage
developers
to
provide
transit
subsidies
for
their
their
properties
to
encourage
transit
use
as
well
to
avoid
having
to
park
everybody
there
and
that's
something
that
especially
affordable.
Housing
has
done
quite
well
providing
VTA
passes
or
other
other
encouragement
to
two
cars.
D
Van
der
sites
with
Greenbelt
Alliance
I
would
look
to
absolutely
echo
everything
that
Leslie
just
said
there
I
think
in
particular,
as
we
look
at
the
cost
for
housing
development
that
the
more
parking
that
we're
requiring
the
higher
the
costs
are
for
housing,
so
to
be
able
to
unlock
opportunities
for
the
sort
of
mixed
use
environment
with
new
homes
integrated
with
new
commercial
development.
We
definitely
need
to
be
focusing
on
ways
that
we
can
minimize
the
parking
burden
that
we're
placing
on
providers
of
new
homes,
particularly
affordable
homes
and
I.
D
Think
that
we've
seen
that
parking
is
the
number
one
inducement
of
driving
patterns.
It's
it's
free
and
available
parking
induces
the
the
travel
patterns
that
we're
trying
to
shift
away
from
so
I
would
I
would
strongly
lean
on
the
size
at
the
sight
of
right
sizing
the
parking
supply
to
meet
our
mobility,
our
multimodal
goals,
rather
than
simply
planning
for
the
past
and
recreating
the
past,
I
think
that
that
that
will
be
challenging
here
as
we
look
at
the
the
rubs
with
existing
uses
and
I.
D
Think
we
just
need
to
be
bold
about
that
and
present
a
strong
agenda
around
prioritizing
multimodal
outcomes
mover
over
housing
cars
rather
than
people,
and
particularly
as
we
look
at
techniques
like
unbundling
requiring
unbundling
parkings
as
one
of
the
strategies
that
we
could
emphasize
here.
This
way,
Thanks
Thank.
K
Just
a
lick
to
reiterate
Leslie's
point
on
the
Eco
pass
idea.
You
know
BTA
right
now
is
undergoing
some
some
budget
troubles,
so
anything
we
can
do
to
promote,
get
residential
or
commercial
developers
buying
into
the
Eco
pass
program.
There's
a
benefits
there
and
then
just
on
the
transportation
demand
management
idea.
I.
F
Thank
You
Nathan,
held
the
Silicon
Valley
leadership
group,
appreciate
the
the
work
and
report
out
of
this
subcommittee,
and
it
made
me
think
you
know
transportation
access
in
traffic.
It
just
sounds
so
sexy
in
a
way,
but
really
I.
Think
of
vibrancy.
You
know
I,
think
of
a
built
environment
that
it's
good
to
incentivize
around
current
transfer
transit
modes,
but
also
to
think
about
how
we
build
those
roads
or
if
we
don't
build
those
roads.
F
So
we
think
about
the
station
area
that
the
best
way
to
dissuade
car
traffic
is
not
to
build
a
road
in
a
certain
area,
build
it
around
and
have
walking
or
biking
or
scootering
or
whatever
other
type
of
modes
through
through
the
areas.
So
I
think
that
some
of
this
encompasses
it
in
terms
of
intersections
are
across
the
bowl
and
safe.
But
it
was
up
in
the
up
in
San
Francisco
last
month,
and
I
saw
some
of
what
that
they're
doing
around
crosswalks,
where
the
crosswalks
are.
F
It
seems
they're
they're,
good
50
percent
wider
than
most
crosswalks
I've
been
in,
and
the
the
curb
cuts
for
going
into
the
crosswalks
actually
extend
out
into
the
street
so
that
cars
aren't
zooming
around
that
corner,
but
because
they
have
to
work
their
way
around
it,
and
so
it's
think
about,
as
we
build
our
infrastructure.
What
are
we
building
it
for
we
billion
for
roads
or
building
it
for
people
and
understanding
that
it's
not
just
cars
that
will
be
here
in
the
future.
Thank.
L
L
E
You
know
one
of
the
comments
earlier
about
PTA
triggered
something
that
I
asked
for
and
unfortunately
we
did
not
have
a
member
on
the
committee
from
VTA,
so
we
couldn't
really
have
a
full
discussion
on
it,
but
one
of
the
things
that
was
most
impressive
to
me
of
the
the
sides
of
the
European
stations
that
we
saw
is
they
separated
the
bus
traffic
and
the
public
transit.
You
know
bus
and
taxis,
I
guess
it
was
from
all
the
other
traffic
and
so
I
wanted
to
see.
L
D
D
F
B
So
we're
gonna
go
ahead
transition
now
the
land-use
and
urban
design
and
Matt
will
help.
Leave
that
discussion
and
I
remind
you
at
the
end
of
this
topic,
will
kind
of
come
back
and
loop
back
around
to
talk
through
maybe
some
of
the
commonalities
that
we
saw
this
discussion
tonight.
Maybe
some
of
the
discrepancies
between
the
different
topics-
and
we
could
have
a
discussion
overall
about
that
as
well
all
right.
N
Well
so
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna,
follow
Bill's
lead
and
with
land
use
urban
design.
If
folks,
who
participated,
could
either
at
one
or
both
of
the
meetings
could
raise
their
hand,
that
would
be
great,
raise
them
high.
Okay,
thank
you
so
I.
Both
of
these
are
tough
acts
to
follow,
that's
especially
Kim
and
so
I,
actually,
because
she
was
I,
decided
to
wear
her
badge
hoping
to
actually
get
some.
You
know
some
good
energy
here
from
from
her,
so
I'm
gonna
give
I'm
gonna
give
a
quick
summary
here.
N
But
let
me
let
me
start
out
with
some
of
the
hi
all
conversation
and
some
of
the
results
that
that
we
had.
The
first
was
that
you
know,
through
all
of
the
conversations
that
we
met
twice
and
through
all
the
conversations
the
Deardon
station
area
plan
is
really
a
great
document
and
there
was
sort
of
a
lot
of
the
comments
that
people
were
making
were
really
reflected
in
that
document,
and
so
there
was
a
recognition
throughout
throughout
all
that
that
that
the
d
sap
is
is
is
a
good
document.
N
It
needs
to
be
updated,
but
it's
a
great
starting
point
and
all
of
the
work
that
was
put
into
that
should
should
really
be
preserved
and
not
just
kind
of
pushed
aside.
The
second
point
that
I
want
to
make
was
the
there
was
a
lot
of
overlap
from
our
group
compared
to
the
other
groups
and
I
think
you
could
see
that
with
parking
and
parks
and
open
space
and
I.
Think
after
this
we'll
have
a
conversation
about
you
know.
Where
is
the
overlap
and
where
that
the
attention
points?
N
The
third
high-level
point
is
that
we
didn't,
we
I
think
we
were
gonna
vote
but
then
sort
of
when
we
came
in
part
of
the
compote
about
what
the
priorities
were.
But
when
we
got
through
it,
it
became
pretty
clear,
at
least
to
me
that
a
lot
of
the
recommendations
are
not
things
that
are
necessarily
gonna
cost
money,
but
they
are
just
ways
of
designing
and
part
of
the
process,
and-
and
you
know,
we
can
I
think
there
are
certainly
some
things
that
will
cost
that
have
a
dollar
value.
N
But
but
a
lot
of
it
is
just
making
sure
that
the
design
of
both
the
the
Google
development,
as
well
as
the
entire
dirt
on
station
area,
on
that
it's
just
designed
and
in
the
right
way,
and
that
that
will
actually
address
some
of
the
land
use
and
design
concerns.
So
at
the
at
the
high
level
we
talked
about
in
terms
of
topics,
we
divided
our
topics
into
land
use
urban
design.
N
Building
heights,
which
is
part
of
urban
design,
parking,
historic
preservation
and
then
impacts
of
development
and
on
I'll
walk
through
these
quickly,
but
as
an
overall
vision,
there
was
consensus
that
the
area
should
be
a
vibrant,
walkable
neighborhood
with
a
coherent
development
pattern.
There
was
a
sense
that
a
very
clear
sense
that
no
one
wants
to
see
this
as
a
series
of
insular
buildings
or
as
just
a
series
of
buildings
that
are
connected
to
one
another.
This
should
really
create
a
vibrant
place.
N
It
should
capitalize
on
the
unique
characteristics
of
the
area
of
the
history
of
the
area.
It
should
be
an
extension
of
downtown,
it
shouldn't
be
a
separate
it
shouldn't
feel
separate,
but
it
really
should
be
an
extension
and
it
really
should
have
a
human
scale
to
the
design.
So
again,
human
scale,
like
I,
heard
through
the
other
groups,
is
really
one
of
the
the
common
themes,
pedestrian
orientation,
high
quality
design
at
human
scale,
design
for
land
use.
N
The
one
of
the
conversations
that
we
that
we
talked
about
quite
a
bit
was
the
mix
of
uses
with
the
dirt
on
station
area
plan.
The
one
of
the
the
central
on
the
cornerstones
of
that
plan
was
was
the
the
san
jose's
park
and
that
clearly
is
not
happening,
and
so
there
was
sort
of
a
question
about
you
know
what
are
the
best
uses
in
different
areas
and
there
was
there
was
actually
some
disagreement
on
in
the
group.
N
So
you
know
I
think
that's
something
that
probably
will
need
to
get
worked
out
a
little
bit.
The
second
point
with
land
use
was
the
desire
to
make
sure
that
the
businesses
coming
in
have
an
open
and
permeable
campus
and
and
I
actually
think
that
of
all
of
the
points
and
I'm
editorializing
here.
So
you
guys
can
all
you
know
disagree
later,
but
this
I
think
was
one
of
the
points
that
they
came
across
and
there
was
a
lot
of
agreement
that
that
people
don't
want
to
see
it
insular
campus.
N
They
want
the
activity
spread
out
onto
the
street.
They
want
the
people
who
are
working
in
the
buildings
out
shopping
and
out
meeting.
They
want
to
be
able
to
pass
through
and
not
have.
It
filled
like
a
walled
off
campus,
similar
to
like
Pixar
in
Emeryville
or
the
new
Apple
campus.
They
want
it
to
feel
like
a
district
and
feel
like
a
city
and
there's,
of
course
attention
there
between
the
needs
of
the
individual
businesses.
But
but
there
was,
there
was
definitely
a
desire
to
to
have
that
open
and
permeable
campus.
N
There
were
other
conversations
around
around
land
use
around
value
capture.
If
there's
an
increase
in
zoning,
that's
provided
on
the
housing
needs
and
then
overall,
a
desire
to
update
the
dirt
on
station
area
plan.
After
this
work
is
done,
it
does
need
to
be
updated
to
reflect
some
of
the
changes,
but
overall
it's
a
very
stable
document.
N
The
next
topic
is
urban
design.
The
the
main
points
that
came
out
of
this
word
the
desire
to
create
a
really
interesting
and
attractive
pedestrian
experience
in
the
area
to
create
a
beautiful
neighborhood,
new
neighborhood
within
the
city
or
new
neighborhoods.
The
blocks
there
that
are
in
some
places,
rather
large,
now
should
be
divided
and
create
more
walkable
blocks.
N
The
the
next
topic
that
we
talked
about
was
building
heights.
This
I
would
actually
say
there
were
two
main.
A
couple
main
points
that
came
out
of
this
one
was
a
desire
to
not
have
to
sort
of
maximize
height
everywhere
and
not
have
just
a
consistent
kind
of
blocky
building
roofline
consistent
roofline
across
the
whole
area,
and
there
should
be
some
variation
in
building
heights,
the
other
which
I'm
a
little
afraid
to
get
into
Nancy.
N
N
N
Okay.
We,
we
did
spend
quite
a
bit
of
time,
also
talking
about
parking
and
the
relationship
between
parking
land
use
in
urban
design
and
some
of
the
points
that
came
out
earlier.
Our
our
points
that
this
group
made
actually
because
there
was
consistency
of
thought
and
potentially
because
it
was
some
of
the
same
folks.
So
one
was
I'm
concerned
that
too
much
land
is
going
to
be
dedicated
to
parking
so
minimize
the
amount
of
land
that's
dedicated
to
parking
record.
N
There
were
recommendations
that
the
park
that
parking
should
be
in
individual
structures,
not
necessarily
integrated
with
the
buildings
themselves,
and
that
allows
for
an
easier
sharing
apartment,
shared
parking
and
also
buildings
should
be
designed
in
order
to
allow
for
conversion
of
parking
assuming
in
the
future.
They're
less
parking
will
be
needed
with
autonomous
vehicles.
So
if
it's
in
a
separate
building,
it
can
be
repurposed
or
rebuilt
as
something
else
without
actually
changing
the
whole
building.
N
N
Next
was
historic:
preservation,
s
or
preservation
is
a
really
integral
part
of
of
the
design
character
of
the
area,
and
so
there
is
a
recommendation
to
preserve
the
significant
historic
structures
and
the
unique
characteristics
of
the
area.
So
it
isn't
necessarily
just
about
if
it's
on
the
the
National,
if
they
register,
you
know,
preserve
it,
and
if
it's
not,
you
can
get
rid
of
it.
N
N
Noise
was
also
a
concern
as
well
as
construction
and
the
impacts
of
construction
on
existing
neighborhoods,
as
well
as
new
people
who
are
moving
in
it
is
a
large
area.
There
could
be
a
lot
of
development
happening
over
a
long
period
of
time
which
could
lead
to
impacts
from
construction
over
a
generation.
So
there
was
concern
about
that
and
also,
finally,
a
recommendation
to
monitor
the
alignment
of
high-speed
rail
through
the
area
for
the
impacts
on
land
use
and
design
character
of
the
area,
and
that
I
believe
is,
is
my
summary.
J
And
kind
of
engaging
the
campus
and
the
surrounding
those
kinda,
most
typical
school
of
thought.
You
hear
about
a
lot
of
these
corporate
entities
where
they
incorporated
cafeteria
corporate
amenities
into
their
developments
for
their
employees
and
what
started
as
a
conversation
of
well
can
we
have
those
also
be
open
to
the
public
I
think
if
we
look
at
the
other
existing
businesses
that
then.
J
I
Thank
you
kathy
sutherland
dumbest
park.
Thank
you
for
the
great
information
and
summarizing
everything.
One
of
the
things
that
I
think
of
when
I
think
of
Google
coming
into
the
neighborhood
is
that
Google's
gonna
hire
an
amazing
architect
and
they're
gonna
make
it
look
incredible
and
I
just
would
like
it
to
be
felt
that
everybody
is
there
to
experience
the
amazing
architecture
and
that
it's
welcoming
to
the
larger
community.
O
Thinking,
Nova
Camacho,
Santa,
Clara,
Valley,
Water
District.
One
thing
we
just
touched
upon,
but
we
didn't
get
into
in
the
land
use
discussion,
is
the
incorporation
of
green
infrastructure
into
the
design
of
these
new
facilities
and
also
stormwater
capture
systems
being
an
integral
part
of
this
development.
O
There's
a
lot
of
options
like
green
roofs
that
can
be
incorporated
as
well
to
add
not
only
a
you
know
real
healthy.
You
know
sustainable
development,
but
also
adds
a
lot
of
interest
in
greenery
and
kind
of
extends
those
those
fingers
upward
and
just
not
outwards,
and
so
that's
something
to
consider
as
well
and
also
for
consideration
to
is
incorporating
these
stormwater
capture
devices
are.
We
should
have
a
I
guess,
a
goal
of
not
to
exacerbate.
O
M
M
So
you
might
not
think
of
zoning
for
affordable
housing
as
being
a
land
use,
because
you
don't
zone
for
affordable
or
market-rate
housing,
but
you
do
you
can
require
a
certain
percentage
be
affordable
in
a
plan
area
and
you
can
also
look
at
different
kinds
of
housing
types
that
that
may
be
more
naturally
affordable
by
being
smaller,
other
kinds
of
things,
and
so
for
that
reason
there's
one
comment:
that's
on
page
12,
its
talks
about
housing.
I!
M
Don't
think
that
we
we
this
this
had
those
points
in
it,
but
it
also
says
attempt
to
match
new
housing
with
the
needs
and
I
guess.
I
would
like
the
little
stronger
word
that
it
would
be
really
desirable
and
important
to
try
to
make
sure
that
the
housing
needs
are
matching
matching
the
needs
of
the
community
there
and
then
the
last
thing
that
I
would
say
on
the
retail
piece,
because
we
did
talk
quite
a
bit
about
this
and
it's
important
that
we
not
put
retail
in
places
where
it
doesn't
make
sense.
M
It
needs
to
be
walkable
retail
and
it
becomes
a
huge
impact
on
housing
developers
to
have
retail
as
a
part
of
their
project,
especially
affordable
developers,
because
it's
not
part
of
the
affordable
housing
finance.
You
can't
use
affordable
housing
funds
for
retail,
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
it
is
where
it
needs
to
be,
because
retail
is
going
to
be
really
important
there,
but
not
that
it's
just
a
a
standard
requirement
of
all
development.
It
needs
to
be
in
the
right
places.
M
G
G
As
someone
who
spends
a
lot
of
time
in
San
Francisco,
obviously
it's
a
completely
different
scenario,
but
the
the
skyline
is
fantastic
and
I
know
that
a
lot
of
people
want
to
maximize
the
usefulness
of
the
volume
of
the
space
there,
but
having
something
like
that
hat
law
that
they
have
in
San,
Francisco
I,
don't
know
what
the
implications
of
that
are
and
I
don't
know
who's
analyzing.
What
that's
going
to
look
like
when
we
get
into
the
development
agreement
phase
with
Google,
which
is
coming
up
fairly
quickly,
so
I!
G
G
C
So
they
meet
probably
the
last
Monday
in
September,
so
we're
getting
close
to
having
some
answers.
A
huge
amount
of
complexity
and
technical
work
being
done,
but
we're
trying
to
get
to
the
bottom
line
as
quickly
as
possible.
Although
it
could
bid
there
be
some
areas
over
the
dere,
not
an
area
where
a
higher
height
could
be
allowed,
and
we
could
still
have
safe
departures
from
the
airport
for
the
airlines
that
use
that
Western
Corridor
in
case
of
emergency.
C
F
E
Reminiscent
of
time
in
meeting
I
was
with
married
and
I
was
26
members
of
the
community
and
he
and
he
said
Harvey,
it's
been
50
minutes
I've
never
been
in
a
meeting
where
you
haven't
spoken
for
50
minutes.
Thank
you.
One
of
the
things
that
I'm
not
sure
where
we
plug
this
in
is
is
a
concern
that
I
know
I've
raised
along
the
way
and
I,
don't
remember
which
committee
I
raised
it
on
and
whether
it
got
reflected
in
our
report,
but
it
certainly
does
reflect
on
menus.
E
Is
that
I
have
a
lot
of
friends
who
are
afraid
to
go
downtown,
there's
a
perception
that
there
are
not
enough
eyes
on
the
street
that
it's
not
activated
enough,
that
the
the
housing
is
separated
from
the
the
clubs
and
etc,
etc,
and
so
there's
just
not
a
lot
of
throughput
and
bodies
on
the
street.
All
add.
You
know
these
at
least
18
hours
a
day,
so
the
question
is,
as
will
be
doing
the
land
use.
F
John
petty
go
pack.
Can
the
members
explain
a
little
more
about
the
equity
analysis?
I,
really
like
the
idea
of
an
equity
analysis
to
understand
the
impacts,
and
how
are
you
thinking
doing
that
and
I'm
not
sure
who-
and
it
was
going
over
very
quickly
but
I
like
that
idea
and
I
like
Leslie's
comments
about
this,
that
we
ought
to
be
thinking
about
a
higher
born
with
housing.
N
N
He
came
up
at
our
first
meeting
as
a
recommendation
that
that
overall,
we
need
to
make
sure
that
all
of
the
topics
are
thinking
about
equity
and
and
when
we're
talking
about
land
use
that
that
should
be
part
of
the
conversation
and
so
I
think
it's
just
a
you
know
a
starting
point
for
that
conversation
without
much
detail,
so
there
there
isn't
anything
more
than
what
that
I
think.
What
was
said,
then,
is
what
is
in
here,
but
it
certainly
is
something
that
needs
to
be
explored.
P
What
we're
doing
here
in
the
station
area
I
would
like
to
see
the
same
principles
extended
to
the
surrounding
neighborhoods.
So
you
know
we've
we
have
kind
of
from
time
to
time
kind
of
mumbled.
At
the
end
of
these
things,
oh
yeah,
we
we
want
to
do
this
or
that
to
protect
existing
parks
or
existing
houses,
but
I
think
we
need
to
start
making
some
fairly
strong
statements
that
we
are
going
to
protect
housing
in
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
and
the
parks
and
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
and
protect
the
connectivity.
That's
within
the
existing
neighborhoods
in
specifics.
P
You
know
like
we're
talking
about
earlier.
The
West
Virginia
odds
are
a
situation
with
a
high-speed
rail
and
also
also
the
aspect
of
historic
preservation
for
all
of
these
neighborhoods
as
well
and
I.
Think
we're
missing
an
opportunity
to
make
some
bolder
stronger
statements
to
include
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
into
this,
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
just
talking
about
the
station
area
but
what's
good
for
the
station
area,
is
good
for
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
and
is
also
good
for
all
of
San
Jose.
P
K
Comments,
I
Buchanan,
for
you,
partnerships
appreciate
the
comments
about
value
capture,
I,
think
it's
really
important
as
we
think
about
particularly
the
Google
project.
You
know
the
amount
of
upzoning
that's
gonna
be
needed
a
couple
of
references
here
to
the
height
study.
You
know
every
foot
you
increase
the
allowable
height
on
on
the
property,
both
the
publicly
purchased
property
or
the
privately
acquired
property.
K
There
are
purposes
right
now
within
these
properties
that
are
in
the
exclusive
negotiated
agreement
with
Google,
and
so
you
know
public
quasi
public
uses,
that's
for
things
like
schools,
colleges,
homeless,
shelters,
libraries,
that's
purely
public
land
for
public
purpose,
and
so
when
we
sell
a
piece
of
land
today,
that's
quasi
public
and
then
later
converted
to
whatever
kind
of
shoulde
mixed-use
whatever
it
is.
That
Google
seeks
to
do
with
that
property.
K
That's
the
public,
giving
up
not
only
a
key
public
resource,
but
then
giving
a
substantial
increase
in
the
value
of
that
property
to
that
company,
and
so
we
need
to
think
about
how
to
capture
that
value
and
again,
I.
Think
the
community
benefits
agreement
framework
is
a
good
one
that
we
should
continue
to
look
at.
The
second
piece,
I'd
just
kind
of
build
on
Leslie's
comments
and
also
a
comment.
They
think
Nicole
had
mentioned
in
the
last
meeting
when
we
think
about
the
housing
needs
in
the
area.
K
Thinking
not
just
about
those
directly
employed
workers
that
are
going
to
work
within
this
complex,
that
Google
is
hoping
to
build,
but
also
those
service
subcontract
workers
who
oftentimes,
you
know,
are
making
wages
where
they're
not
able
to
really
afford
housing
here
and
so
thinking
about
their
needs
in
both
the
how
we
plan
in
the
area
and
in
how
we
think
about
capturing
the
value
of
some
of
these
land-use
changes.
That
Google
is
gonna,
sync,
be
it
around
affordable
housing
or
even
things
like
job
standards
which
we'll
get
into
next
round.
But
thank
you.
Okay,.
F
B
F
Not
having
to
close
things,
you
know
West,
Virginia
or
SRA,
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we're
responsive.
You
know
we
have
done
a
lot
of
work
in
this
area.
We're
going
to
continue
to
then
putting
engaging
with
you
know
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
as
well,
so
more
to
come,
but
I
just
wanna
make
sure
that
that
was
that
I
had
a
chance
to
respond
to
some
of
those
comments.
D
Matt
benders
ice
cream
belt
Alliance
something
of
a
just
a
clarifying
question
under
the
potential
solutions
for
parking.
It
says
it
calls
for
recognizing
the
existing
parking
strategies
in
the
existing
teardown
stationary
plan
and
then
has
a
number
of
other
discussions
of
positive
parking
policies
and
I
would
love
to
know
more
about
the
the
conversation
around
that
recognition
of
existing
parking
strategies.
D
It
seems,
like
the
stationary
plan,
has,
has
some
important
strategies
and
to
achieve
the
city's
goal
for
overall
VMT
reduction,
we're
going
to
need
to
significantly
build
upon
the
set
of
strategies
that
are
in
the
existing
plan
and
go
beyond
what
what
was
achieved
in
2014.
So,
if
there's
more
discussion
of
how
how
that
particular.
J
Research
and
lots
of
effort
was
put
into
figuring
out
parking
strategies
and
I
think
the
request
was
that
the
previous
work
and
previous
live
work
that
had
been
done
not
get
thrown
out,
basically
be
considered
and
I
think
the
kind
of
took
the
head
and
said:
okay.
There
are
good
things
within
the
door
down
stationary
plan,
but
there
is
not
the
conversation
back
and
forth
that
that
business,
that
should
be
a
limiting
factor.
J
It
also
shouldn't
be
wholesale
abandoned,
so
I
think
that
was
as
much
as
anything
else
just
an
acknowledgement
that
a
large
tenant
within
the
area
like
si
P
has
parking
concerns.
It
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
be
exactly
what
was
in
the
dirt
and
stationary
plan
before,
but
we
need
to
think
about
how
very
needs
can
be
met.
N
And
I
think
it
did
echo
the
larger
point
of
the
recognition
of
the
dirt
on
station
area
plan
and
all
of
the
work
that's
been
done.
You
know
looking
back
if
it's
four
years
later
from
when
it
was
completed,
started
what
six
years
ago,
seven
years
ago.
So
you
know
things
have
changed,
but
it
doesn't
mean
that
everything
has
changed
right
and
so
change
change.
What
needs
to
be
changed
and
recognize
the
work
that's
been
done
and
pulled
that
forward
without
throwing
everything
away
all
right,
any
other
land
use
her
design
comments.
A
B
As
we
suggested
before
hosting
stay
here,
baby
excellent,
so
there
was
a
lot
of
commonalities
that
came
out
as
we
were
talking.
Obviously,
we
talked
a
lot
about
human
scale.
Excuse
me,
sorry,
we
talked
about
integration
with
the
campus,
with
the
surrounding.
We
heard
a
lot
about
sustainability
and
green
infrastructure
that
came
up
between
the
parks
and
the
land-use
topics.
B
Obviously
the
transit
integration
with
the
land
use
was
a
big
piece
as
well.
So
there's
a
lot
of
commonalities
that
came
out.
Maybe
we'll
start
there
is
there
any
others
that
you
all
noticed
that
we
want
to
kind
of
highlight
here.
As
these
three
topics
we
talked
about
noticing
that
we
do
have
the
job
as
one
as
you
mentioned.
B
Jeffrey
and
there's
gonna
be
stuff
that
pops
up
in
the
jobs
that
might
correlate
with
some
of
these
as
well
any
other
common,
a
letÃs
that
we
want
to
discuss
or
highlight
right
now,
just
to
kind
of
see
how
these
topics
are
integrated.
Potentially,
as
we
move
to
the
next
phase
of
developing
the
report
and
maybe
prioritizing
all
of
these
topics
together
or
did
I
just
do
a
fantastic
job
of
summarized
that
on
my
own,
yes,.
J
J
B
I
You
Kathy
Sutherland
Delmas
Park,
one
of
the
most
interesting
conversations
I
thought
we
had
was
about
what
is
historic
and
what
is
art
and
the
the
group
we
were
in
I
can't
remember
which
one
it
was.
But
we
were
thinking
we
were
having
this
discussion
because
a
lot
of
the
things
that
we
want
to
preserve
whether
the
neon
signs
was
the
key
thing
they
don't
necessarily
qualify
as
being
art
or
historic.
J
Derek
Seaver,
with
the
same
as
a
downtown,
Association
I,
think
the
one
that
you
know
really
kind
of
stood
out
for
us
is
set
out
in
all
three
of
the
the
report.
Outs
was
the
the
idea
of
connectivity
and
in
the
integration,
as
you
mentioned,
I
think
in
the
parks
you
talk
about
existing
barriers.
This
featured
prominently
in
the
transportation
report
out
and
then
land
use
talking
about
the
extension
of
the
downtown
core
and
not
a
separate
neighborhood,
the
downtown
core.
J
We
certainly
feels
a
lot
of
momentum
and
part
of
the
danger
of
a
process
like
this.
Is
it
kind
of
shifts
the
center
of
gravity
to
the
west
side
of
downtown,
but
that
emphasis
on
connectivity
is
certainly
exciting
from
our
perspective,
because
that
makes
this
and
he
has
meant
to
that
momentum
and
certainly
not
something
that
could
could
slow
it
down.
So
I
think
that
that
that
emphasis
we
would
love
to
see
remain
going
forward.
Great.
B
Great
point:
thank
you
very
much
anything
else.
We
could
transition
anything.
You
see
it
as
conflicting.
Maybe
it
seemed
like
it
was
all
very,
very
much
synergetic
to
me,
but
is
there
anything
that
might
be
conflicting
that
you
all
want
to
point
out
from
these
topics
and
we
pop
out
the
particularly
hate?
No
okay,.
I
I
think
there
will
be
further
discussion
about
south
of
San
Carlos
and
whether
or
not
that
should
stay
as
a
residential
neighborhood
or
whether
there
is
going
to
be
the
ability
to
develop
large
commercial
buildings
there,
because
that
is
the
name.
The
neighborhood
area
of
Delmas
Park
or
one
of
the
strong
neighborhood
areas
of
delmas
Parkin.
And
whether
or
not
you
should
have
eight
store
commercial
development
within
a
residential
neighborhood.
Existing
neighborhood
I
think
that
we're
going
to
have
a
conversation
about
that.
F
Of
taking
off
on
what
edward
mentioned
about
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
I
noticed
in
the
transportation
solution,
group
I
want
to
make
sure
we
don't
forget
the
arena
traffic
and
parking
management
plan
as
it
relates
to
protecting
the
surrounding
neighborhoods.
As
a
member
of
the
arena,
Oversight
Committee
don't
want
to
even
mention
how
many
years
ago
was
over
25.
The
neighborhood's
put
a
lot
of
work.
C
F
O
O
H
Think
transformative
lis
in
terms
of
how
we
are
approaching
it
really
from
an
integrated
standpoint,
changing
all
of
our
design,
centers
changing
the
physical
landscape
of
circulation,
all
of
it
I
just
feel
like
it
was
such
a
great
response.
People
are
willing
and
open
to
think
big
and
just
wholesale
change.
Great.
B
B
Q
Q
P
So
Larry
Ames
and
I'm
just
very
impressed
with
all
the
results
here.
It's
so
pleased
with
all
the
results
that
you
have
so
glad
to
hear
you
talk
about
the
Los
Gatos
Creek
Trail
and
the
Guadalupe
River
Trail,
and
the
daylighting
of
the
los
gatos
I'm
so
happy
that
you
have
that
in
there
the
bike
and
pedestrian
access
to
connections
I'm
glad
you're
talking
about
including
the
historic
buildings
and
resources
and
by
the
way,
at
one
of
the
meetings
I
mentioned
little
Scott,
the
nearby
Willow
Glen
trestle.
P
It
is
still
standing
right
now,
I'm
glad
to
hear
you
talk
about
the
sustainable
and
green
design
and
social
equity.
One
comment,
though,
I
take
exception
to
a
comment
there.
Bicycling
is
not
just
for
the
low-wage
workers
and
the
homeless.
It's
also
for
high
wage
workers
as
well
I
mean
like
when
I
was
at
in
the
aerospace
engineering.
A
number
of
us
were
biking
to
work.
It
was
a
great
way
to
clear
the
mind
and
get
the
blood
moving
in
the
morning.
It
was
like
a
mini
vacation.
P
It
was
a
great
way
to
get
away
from
the
computers.
It's
also
part
of
the
envision
2040
to
change
the
reduce
the
vehicle
miles
traveled
and
reduce
the
mode
shift,
people
they're
environmentally
sensitive.
We
don't
want
to
burn
oil
and
traffic
congestion,
but
anyhow
so
overall
I'm
very
excited
with
this
and
looking
forward
to
seeing
it
develop.
Thank
you.
H
H
O
R
I
also
was
mentioned
and
a
cath
you
mentioned
about
the
signs
and
that
they
don't
fall
under
appropriate
definitions
and
that's
true.
The
dancing
Pig
sign,
which
has
come
up
more
than
one
occasion,
is
a
good
example
of
that
it
is
not
considered
public
art.
So
therefore
it
doesn't
qualify
for
any
kind
of
funding.
In
that
respect.
R
That
won't
be
the
only
time
that
comes
up
there's,
so
many
of
the
signs
that
are
hitting
that
historic
mark
either
from
their
long
term,
just
here
in
San
Jose
in
what
they
represent,
or
there
may
be
at
the
fifty
year
mark
and
there
may
be
other
aspects
we
have
I
think
there's
only
one
in
San
Jose,
that's
even
landmarked,
others
that
should
be
or
could
be,
are
not
city
resources
don't
allow
for
it
at
this
point,
and
so
the
potential
of
losing
those
is
great.
So
please
keep
that
in
mind.
R
As
you
have
your
conversations,
I
mean
the
sensory.
Is
that
interest
in
them?
If
you
want
to
say
them,
you're
gonna
have
to
help,
because
we
need
to
get
changes
in
definitions
so
that
they're
properly
reviewed
and
protected
in
San,
Jose
and
right
now
it's
a
struggle.
It's
ongoing
and
we're
gonna
keep
at
it
and
we
hope
you'll
be
helping
as
well.
So
thank
you
very
much.
S
Thank
you
so
talk
about
these
a
little
bit.
There
was
a
lot
of
good
conversation
about
their
great
separation
at
oz
array,
and
you
know,
movements
across
the
tracks,
but
I've
actually
looked
at
all
three
about
18
months
ago
and
Ronnie
would
take
the
great
separated
and
the
collateral
damage
was
was
beyond
belief.
S
So
at
that
point,
you've
really
got
to
start
thinking
about
other
ways
to
approach
the
problem
and
how
could
we
possibly
close
it,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
end
up
with
something
better
than
what
we
have
now
so,
potentially
you
could
think
of
closing
enough
to
vehicular
traffic
and
I.
Have
a
really
you
know,
vibrant
retail.
You
know
people
across
the
street,
you
know
coming
across
bikes
and
pets
and
reroute
the
vehicle
air
traffic
over
the
san
carlos
or
the
pass.
S
And
how
would
you
possibly
go
across
the
tracks,
but
guess
what
we
just
build,
these
brand-new
beautiful,
los,
los
gatos
bridge.
You
know
over
the
creek,
so
maybe
that
would
be
way
for
the
pedestrians
to
go
so
potentially
you
could
get
better
and
then
there's
a
lot
of
discussion
about.
We
on
lift
everything
up,
20
or
30
feet
and
now
start
thinking.
Do
you
really
want
freight
and
high-speed
rail
to
be
20
to
30
feet
up
in
the
air
so
that
the
entire
neighborhood?
Can
you
hear
hear
it
from
one
mile
either
side
of
it?
S
H
I'm
Stephanie
couple
resident
of
Willow
Glen
many
affiliations,
one
of
which
is
trebs
trekkers,
a
group
of
hikers
who
frequently
use
the
trail
system.
Here
they
will
be
thrilled
to
hear
about
plans
for
kind
of
connecting
everything
up.
We
like
to
do
three
to
five
to
eight
mile
hikes,
and
especially
when
it's
raining.
The
ideal
is
the
paved
trails
on
Moscow
to
us
and
guadeloupean
and
coyote,
and
so
forth.
H
H
H
T
T
T
P
More
just
a
general
comment:
Kevin
Chrisman,
Gardner
Neighborhood
Association
I've
been
very
pleased
with
the
amount
and
quality
of
the
interaction
with
Google
in
our
neighborhood.
So
far
and
I
am
looking
forward
to
more
conversations
in
the
future.
I
think
that
came
up
in
the
public
comment
that
I
didn't
want
to.
Have
anybody
get
the
idea
that
you're
not
listening
to
the
neighborhood's,
because
all
the
neighborhoods
that
I've
talked
to
and
area
not
just
gardener,
have
been
very
pleased
with
how
things
have
been
going.
K
But
just
to
say
a
question:
is
staff
I
mean?
How
are
we
thinking
about,
like
so
far,
I
think
we're
seeing
kind
of
a
cafeteria
style
approach
to
a
lot
of
these
different
topic
areas
and
I
appreciate
the
the
breadth
and
the
kind
of
depth
of
the
conversation.
But
you
know
a
certain
point.
Even
you
know,
with
the
cafeteria
style
approach,
there's
your
desserts
and
there's
your
entrees,
and
so
how
are
we
thinking
about
trying
to
parse
these
conversations
and
to
get
out?
K
You
know
what
are
the
issues
that
are
kind
of
most
core
that
are
maybe
the
the
most
important
and
how
do
we
think
about
the
kind
of
different
sets
of
responsibilities?
So
for
some
items
you
know
it
may
be
city
policy
or
area
wide
policy,
that's
most
appropriate
and
for
other
things
there's
you
know,
particularly.
K
You
know
acute
impacts
of
a
project
of
the
scale
of
Google's
that
maybe
it
wouldn't
make
sense
to
wrap
that
same
kind
of
set
of
analysis
and
responsibilities
around
a
smaller
developer,
with
kind
of
less
impact.
So
how?
How
do
we
kind
of
take?
What's
been
a
really
robust
conversation
and
narrow?
It
down
into
something
meaningful
that
the
City
Council
can
actually
wrap
its
hands
around
and
and
Google
can
wrap
its
hands
around
because
right
now,
it's
kind
of
like
you
know
the
public
or
someone
to
just
pick
up
this
document.
K
A
So
I
do
think
the
solution
groups
that
you
guys
are
in
the
the
things
that
you
guys
have
talked
about,
why
it
might
be
kind
of
a
cafeteria
approach,
thus
far
I
think
all
those
things
we
move
forward
and
in
some
way
in
those
buckets
so
you're
likely
to
see
in
the
report
that
comes
forward
and
what
will
be
doing
is
you'll,
get
a
memo
from
Lori
and
I,
probably
over
the
next
two
or
three
weeks,
to
kind
of
outline.
This
so
you'll
see
something
not
of
substance
but
of
structure
and
kind
of
the.
A
Why
it's
this
way,
the
what
it's
going
to
be
and
how
it
will
work
so
that
we
can
have
more
of
a
robust
conversation.
I
see
that
the
meat
of
the
issue
is:
where
do
those
things
go
Geoffrey
and
I'd
say
we're
still
trying
to
figure
some
of
that
out,
because
if
we
look
at
all
those
things
tonight,
you
know
forty
something
things
I
talked
about.
Some
of
it
is
totally
applicable,
Kim
and
Nancy
as
they
go
into
negotiations
on
MoU
with
Google.
A
Like
you
know,
in
the
next
few
weeks,
some
of
that
is
gonna,
be
you
know,
more
applicable
to
Boris
and
our
department
transportation.
Is
they
work
through
high-speed
rail
issues,
so
that's
kind
of
getting
this
report
and
starting
to
frame
out
what
goes
where
and
how
this
group
is
continuing,
because
this
is
kind
of
just
remember
the
first
hurdle
and
a
long
number
of
hurdles
that
this
group
needs
to
do.
F
H
As
more
food
for
thought,
on
August,
1st
I
want
to
invite
members
of
the
said:
we're
gonna
be
hosting
Scott
Kratz
who's,
the
executive
director
of
the
11th
Street
bridge
project
in
Washington
DC,
and
it's
a
project
that
is
going
to
be
linking
to
neighborhoods
with
the
physical
bridge
over
the
Anacostia,
River
and
they've
done
a
ton
of
work
around
these
two
neighborhoods,
which
are
very
different.
Socio
socioeconomically
and
thinking
ahead
about
gentrification
and
displacement.
H
G
G
Supplying
us
with
an
FAQ
document,
and
it
was
basically
around
what
happens
at
the
end
of
what
is
described
here
as
phase
three
so
kind
of
what
you
are
just
saying,
Lee
I
think
a
lot
of
us
are
not
really
sure
not
only
what
happens
next,
but
are
we
reconstituted
as
a
group?
Do
we
stay
intact
and
all
of
those
kinds
of
things?
So
what
happens
after
September
and
for
me
in
particular,
you
know
we
talked
about
you,
know
the
market
represented
by
builders
and
developers
and
Google.
G
A
Good
question
Kim
is
working
on
an
FAQ
document
that
I
think
we
will
hopefully
have
posted
by
the
end
of
the
week.
Dhananjay,
org
and
I
think
what
we
can
do
is
also
just
email
it
to
the
entire
group
by
the
end
of
the
week.
So
Laurie
will
do
that.
So
you
have
that
this
group
goes
for
a
long
time.
So
after
September
bill
you
signed
up
for
a
lot
more
meetings:
they're
not
gonna,
be
every
three
weeks
or
every
eight
days
like
we
just
did
to
you
with.
A
You
know
variety
of
subcommittees
within
subcommittees,
but
knowing
all
the
things
that
are
gonna
happen
in
time
and
quite
frankly,
I
mean
a
bar
vt,
a
high-speed
rail
or
three
things
that
we
keep
on
talking
about.
But
you
know
based
off
of
what
happens
with
Google.
There
could
be
other
steps
that
we
want
to
take
and
in
other
conversations
and
Jeffrey
is
absolutely
right.
There's
there's
other
companies
thinking
about
other
than
there's
Google
and
and
we
look
at
that
area
as
a
whole.