►
From YouTube: AUG 13, 2018 | Station Area Advisory Group
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Zak
members
we're
gonna,
get
started
on
meeting
number:
seven
Monday,
August,
13th,
a
few
different
housekeeping
items,
sac
members
and
members
of
the
public.
If
you
have
not
validated
your
parking,
please
take
two
or
three
minutes
and
validate
your
parking.
So
no
one's
trapped
in
the
garage
tonight.
A
Okay,
I
think
everyone
has
that
so
before
I
hand
it
off
to
Dave
to
walk
through
the
meeting.
I
just
want
to
do
kind
of
a
few
other
housekeeping
items.
First,
normally
I
would
ask
for
a
motion
and
we
approve
minutes
from
the
last
meeting,
but
we
had
a
little
bit
of
a
hiccup,
which
is
my
mistake,
so
I'm
gonna
need
you
guys
to
do
a
different
vote.
A
If
you
would
like
to
continue
tonight,
but
essentially
we
posted
tonight's
agenda
on
the
Deardon
SJ
org
website,
which
is
kind
of
the
main
website
for
this
process,
as
well
as
the
city's
the
city's
City
Clerk
public
calendar.
We
have
a
Sun
Shine
requirement
that
it
gets
posted
to
the
City
Attorney's
Brown
Act
page,
which
did
not
up
correctly.
So
zdenda
was
posted
in
two
spots,
but
it
was
not
posted
there.
So
the
group
can
move
forward
with
this
meeting
if
they
would
like.
A
But
you
do
need
to
vote
on
this
amended
agenda
and
if
you
would
like
to
continue
with
tonight's
meeting
before
we
can
move
forward
as
part
of
our
sunshine
requirements
and
then
we'll
approve
the
meeting
minutes
when
we
come
back
to
you
in
September,
for
the
two
meetings
can
I
get
a
motion
from
anyone
to
hear
the
meeting
tonight,
Kathy
second
from
Laura,
okay,
anyone
opposed
to
having
the
meeting
tonight.
Besides
me,
okay,.
A
So,
thank
you
very
much.
The
last
bit
of
housekeeping.
Obviously
we
have
a
lot
of
people
here
would
like
to
participate
tonight
and
I'm
imagining
a
majority
of
them
would
like
to
participate
around
the
big
policy
discussion.
We're
happy
we're
having
tonight
and
not
some
of
the
housekeeping
stuff
at
the
end
of
the
meeting.
A
If
we
do
have
time
but
I'm
imagining
worth
quite
a
bit
of
dialogue
with
the
SAG
and
the
general
public
tonight
on
those
solution
groups.
So
we
will
do
public
comment
after
item
number,
five
on
the
agenda
tonight
to
the
general
public.
If
you
have
comment
cards,
they
go
to
Loren
right
here
and
we
will
do
our
best
as
staff
to
go
outside
and
make
sure
that
any
members
of
the
aren't
in
here
comment
cards
and
we
will
be
announcing
names
out
there
as
well.
C
C
Just
can
we
get
an
update
through
the
process
in
terms
of
how
we're
making
sure
that
the
public
is
actually
being
able
to
hear
the
conversation?
I
know
their
staff
is
working
on
that,
but
if
folks
can,
let
us
know
as
that's
resolved,
because
that
is
worrisome
I.
Think
too
many
of
us.
Thank
you
folks,.
C
A
So
while
dave
is
doing,
this,
I'm
gonna
be
talking
to
staff.
Normally,
when
we've
had
large
meetings
here
in
the
past,
we've
had
a
bit
of
overflow
council
chambers.
We
are
going
through
AV
updates
in
there
right
now,
so
we
don't
have
the
ability
to
broadcast,
and
you
can
kind
of
see
this
room's
already
been
done.
Chambers
was
the
last
one
and
we
just
didn't
get
it
done
in
time,
so
we
will
be
trying
to
figure
out
how
we
put
a
computer
or
another
television
monitor
out
there
in
the
next
few
minutes.
B
Thank
You
Leigh.
Thank
you
for
the
question
Maria.
So,
as
Leigh
mentioned,
we're
gonna
switch
one
item
around
the
public
comment,
but,
as
usual,
we're
gonna
go
through
the
meeting
notes
from
the
last
meeting
make
sure
that
we
capture
that
input
appropriately
we're
gonna,
give
you
a
quick
update
on
the
engagement
process
and
let
you
know
what
we've
been
up
to
some
of
the
information
that
we've
gathered
to
date
and
and
what
we're
planning
moving
forward.
We
have
do-don
stationary
updates
bill
from
the
city
is
gonna.
Give
you
a
couple
quick
updates
about.
B
What's
been
happening,
the
stationary
over
the
past
few
months,
we're
gonna,
have
most
importantly,
a
bulk
of
this
evenings
meeting
is
going
to
be
for
the
report
back
from
the
jobs
and
housing
groups.
As
you
know,
we
had
a
preliminary
report
back
from
the
housing
they
had.
A
third
meeting.
We're
gonna
give
you
some
updates
of
what
happened
at
that
meeting.
We
did
surveys
at
both
those
groups
and
have
that
information
to
share.
B
So
a
lot
of
great
information
to
share
that
we're
gonna
present
to
you
all
and
have
a
discussion
about,
and
then
we'll
have
public
comment
after
that,
then
we're
going
to
also
talk
through
as
you've
been
hearing
over
the
past
few
meetings.
We
have
a
report.
That's
going
to
be
the
culmination
of
all
this
great
information
that
were
gathering
we're
gonna.
Give
you
an
update
on
the
outline
of
that
report
tonight
and
have
a
discussion
with
you
all
about
what
all
is
going
to
go
in.
It's
going
crazy,
all
right!
B
Let's
try
that
and
then
we're
gonna
talk
through
next
steps,
as
we
usually
do.
So
with
that.
As
always,
we
start
with
the
ssag
group
agreements.
You
all
have
been
excellent
and
very
respectful
I
want
to
make
sure
that
stays
that
consistency
stays
your
this
meeting
both
for
you
all
the
members
of
the
public.
We
want
to
be
respectful
of
people's
time
and
their
viewpoints
and
perspectives.
B
We
don't
want
to
talk
over
each
other,
always
remember
to
flip
your
nametag
to
the
side,
so
we
can
call
on
you
and
make
sure
everyone
is
heard,
and
just
remember
that
we
have
a
diverse
group
of
perspectives
here
and
everyone's
points
are
valid.
We
want
to
make
sure
they're
heard
as
we
go
through
the
process,
and
then
we've
been
doing
this
excellently,
really
working
together,
collaboratively
to
think
big
I
think
you
all
have
been
fantastic
at
that.
We
really
appreciate
you
for
that,
and
I
always
like
to
say,
have
fun
and
make
new
friends.
B
That's
always
the
best
part
of
that
process.
So
real
quick
overview
of
what
happened
at
the
last
meeting.
We
did
have
report
backs
from
three
different
groups,
one
of
which
was
the
parks
open
space,
sustainability
and
neighborhood
quality
of
life.
We
put
these
into
big
buckets.
We
had
a
lot
of
conversation
about
transit
planning,
recognizing
that
dear
Don
is
a
hub
and
connecting
regionally
through
important,
open
spaces.
We
call
them
those.
The
green
fingers,
I
believe
was
part
of
that
as
well,
which
kind
of
shows
up.
B
In
the
Parkland
section,
we
talked
about
the
high
speed
rail
and
to
avoid
impacts
on
existing
park
spaces.
As
far
as
the
design
of
parkland
again,
those
green
fingers
were
mentioned
as
a
way
to
kind
of
extend
the
network.
Throughout
the
area
we
talked
about
reducing
Park
the
impact
fees
to
build
new
parks.
We
talked
about
requiring
buildings
adjacent
to
parts
to
take
advantage
of
that
park,
space
and
really
kind
of
integrated.
B
We
also
had
the
transportation,
access
and
traffic
group
report
out.
We
talked
about
the
travel
demand,
management,
piece
and
parking
needs
again
minimizing
parking,
hopefully
to
reduce,
driving
and
and
really
looking
at,
increasing
the
availability
of
infrastructure
for
pads
and
bikes.
We
talked
about
trip
caps,
potentially
looking
around
at
other
cities
like
Mountain
View.
B
As
examples
company
sponsored
programs
really
to
kind
of
again
give
resources
to
folks
to
take
advantage
of
other
their
modes
of
transportation,
we
talked
about
separate
bus
and
traffic
and
in
taxi
traffic
and
other
modes,
making
sure
that
they
have
availability
to
get
through
the
area
adequate
parking
for
bikes,
another
one
that
sometimes
overlooked.
We
all
mention
is
something
that's
important
and
then
the
transit
planning
again
aligning
high-speed
rail
and
making
sure
that
it
doesn't
close
off
intersections
or
impact
housing
in
the
area.
B
Lastly,
we
had
land
use
in
urban
design
represented.
We
talked
a
lot
about
the
design
of
development
that
would
happen
in
the
area,
making
sure
that
it's
not
insular
and
it's
very
approachable
and
integrated
with
the
site
and
an
easy
to
access.
We
talked
about
support
for
local
and
existing
businesses,
strategic
about
retail
and
making
sure
that
it's
homegrown
and
has
a
unique
character,
so
it
really
has
a
chance
to
standout
provide
more
housing.
B
That's
been
a
kind
of
consistent
link
through
this
process,
but
affordable
housing,
a
particular
of
all
types,
and
we
talked
a
lot
about
affordable
by
design
and
kind
of
what
that
means.
Different
size
units
and
exploring
and
equity
analysis
that
has
been
brought
up
a
few
times
and
thinking
about
service,
contract
workers
and
that'll
be
something
that
will
kind
of
explore
moving
forward.
B
B
We
talked
about
stormwater
capture
and
green
roofs,
concern
for
lack
of
height
variation
and
making
sure
that
there's
a
variety
of
the
skyline,
and
then
we
talked
about
value
capture
and
how
important
that
is,
especially
if
zoning
is
change
as
we
go
through
this
process,
so
that
covers
the
each
one
of
the
report.
Bag
groups
we
did
have
overall.
Excuse
me
overall
comments
as
well
to
extend
for
the
neighborhood
to
extend
these
principles
to
adjacent
neighborhoods
and
not
just
steered
on
to
make
sure
that
we
have.
B
This
cohesive
approach
makes
strong
statements
to
preserve
and
protect
homes,
parks,
history
and
connectivity,
ensure
existing
neighborhoods
benefit
from
development
in
the
deer
down
station
area
redevelopment.
The
south
side
of
deer
Don
create
a
sense
of
place
through
historic
and
art,
or
history,
historic
and
art,
to
create
the
identity
for
the
area,
enhanced
connections
to
downtown
again
sustainable
design,
as
we
talked
about
it's
a
common
thread
and
then
through
the
planning
process,
understand
that
there
is
a
parking
management
plan.
B
That's
been
done
and
there's
a
lot
of
stakeholder
input
to
take
into
account
and
then,
lastly,
to
ensure
that
policies
do
not
impede
on
achieving
the
grand
vision
for
the
area,
so
that
was
a
lot
to
absorb
all
at
once.
We
just
want
to
make
sure
we
captured
everything
correctly
from
the
last
meeting.
Is
there
any
input
that
we
might
have
missed
that
you
all
want
to?
Let
us
know
about.
Are
you
pointing
at.
E
B
Those
were
included
in
the
summary
notes
these
were
just
I
should
have
clarified.
These
are
input
that
we
got
from
this
SOG
on
the
summary
and
the
report
backs.
That's
definitely
part
of
the
summary
notes
that
we
got
from
those
groups.
This
was
just
additional
information
that
the
SOG
brought
up
during
the
discussion,
so
that's
definitely
integrated
in
those.
So.
B
F
F
We've
completed
a
couple
and
we
have
a
few
more
planned,
including
one
this
weekend
at
the
district
to
village
fest,
and
basically
these
are
where
we
go
to
community
events
with
tables.
You
can
see
in
the
bottom
right
there
that
was
from
the
Willow
Glen
dancing
on
the
Avenue
event.
We
with
our
goal
is
to
spread
awareness
of
the
process,
share
information,
collect
input,
and
we
have
email
lists
that
we're
collecting
and
so
I'll
be
sending
out
an
email
update
this
week.
In
fact,
and
then
stakeholder
meetings,
we've
met
with
a
couple.
F
I
accidentally
put
downtown
Association
as
completed,
but
that's
one
that
is
should
be
in
the
bottom
list.
That's
in
the
works,
and
so
we've
are
working
on
having
a
few
more
meetings
at
these
community
centers.
Most
of
those
will
be
in
early
to
mid
September,
so
the
point
of
them
will
be
to
start
reporting
back
on
the
feedback
we
have
been
getting
and
just
continuing
the
conversation
and
making
sure
people
are
understanding.
What's
what
we're
doing
here?
F
So
the
other
items
that
we're
still
working
on
is
a
survey,
so
we
will
be
hopefully
getting
you
more
information
on
that
later
this
week
as
to
what
that
survey
will
look
like
and
how
we'll
be
implementing
it.
Those
are
the
main
updates.
I
have
for
now
any
questions
on
the
process
not
see
any.
Oh,
no
Paul
has
one
thank
you.
G
Thanks
Laurie,
so
this
actually
isn't
a
question.
I
just
wanted
to
provide
an
update
for
the
benefit
of
the
rest
of
the
group,
the
San
Jose
downtown
residents
Association.
We
posted
a
forum
on
August,
2nd,
that's
one
of
the
ones
that's
listed
up
here
for
stakeholder
meetings
with
about
35
to
40,
downtown
residents
and
I
just
want
to
share
out
some
of
the
the
items
that
came
up
for
discussion
very
quickly,
integrating
Google
with
the
downtown
business
community's
looking
for
models
of
partnership
with
local
restaurants,
cafes
and
other
businesses,
collaboration
with
San
Jose,
Police
Department.
G
This
is
one
of
the
questions
that
they
thought
this
group
should
be
tackling
in
particular,
and
it
hasn't
really
come
up
explicitly
so
something
for
all
of
us
to
consider
for
maybe
the
next
phase
of
sag
or
a
future
meeting
ensuring
that
San
Jose's
rich
history
is
preserved
and
incorporated.
We've
had
some
discussions
about
that
already
at
the
group,
but
that
came
up
and
we
had
a
pretty
lengthy
discussion
about
that.
G
Residents
would
like
to
better
understand
why
San
Jose
downtown
has
struggled
to
take
off
and
would
like
to
see
presentations
on
research
on
that
question.
That's
more
of
a
staff
point
I
think,
but
that
was
a
that
was
an
item
we
discussed
would
like.
They
would
like
to
see
some
exploration
for
how
Google
and
and
the
changes
with
the
dirt
on
station
area.
More
generally
can
be
part
of
the
homelessness
conversation
with
special
attention
given
to
mental
illness.
They
would
like
to
see
consideration
of
new
transportation
technologies.
G
I
didn't
necessarily
see
that
in
the
previous
slide,
but
things
like
automated
vehicles
and
other
new
technologies
and
then
early
activation
of
public
spaces
well
develop
place
and
that
I
think
aligns
with
a
bill.
One
of
our
other
representatives
had
talked
about
during
his
TED
talk,
so
I
just
wanted
to
share
that
we're
planning
on
doing
more
of
these
forms
with
downtown
residents
so
I'll
be
sure
to
keep
you
all
apprised.
Thank.
F
F
G
F
F
A
So
a
point
of
order,
the
the
council
chamber
is
open,
so
we
made
an
announcement.
Some
are
wishing
to
not
watch
the
council
chambers
when
we
do
public
comment
and
for
anyone,
that's
already
in
chambers,
because
a
some
some
did
leave.
We're
gonna
call
ten
names
out
at
a
time
and
start
a
line
here.
So
if
anyone
is
in
chambers
and
and
here's
their
name
come
over,
and
even
though
we're
at
some
capacity
issues,
we
will
find
you
a
way
for
you
to
come
in
comment
and
then
go
back
out.
I
Thank
you,
my
life,
okay,
good,
getting
deaf
as
I,
get
old,
sorry,
I'm,
bill
liquor
and
I'm
the
project
manager
for
all
things
dirt
on
for
the
city
out
working
out
of
economic
development
can
I.
Can
you
hear
me
now
great?
Thank
you.
A
couple
of
things.
I'm
I'm
gonna,
be
very
brief
with
updates
tonight,
because
a
couple
of
these
topics
are
they're
all
ongoing,
but
it's
important
just
to
let
you
know
that
we
are
coordinating
on
the
BART
Phase
two.
I
Many
of
which
you've
heard
already
through
this
meeting
and
I
think
it's
being
taken
into
consideration
by
both
the
city
and
high
speed
rail,
as
we
move
forward
into
those
into
that
project
and
defining
it
kind
of
this
all
culminates,
though,
as
we
pull
into
the
dirt
on
integrated
station
concept.
The
city
in
collaboration
with
VTA,
high-speed
rail
and
Cal
train,
have
embarked
on
a
contract
with
a
design
firm.
I
It's
comprised
of
two
firms,
one
is:
are
Cadis,
which
is
an
international
construction
management,
engineering
firm
and
a
Dutch
architectural
firm,
Bentham
Crowell,
who
are
responsible
for
a
large
number
of
the
integrated
rail
stations,
and
especially
in
Holland
but
elsewhere
in
Europe,
and
we
will
begin
that
process
in
September,
with
internal
working
as
the
different
agencies
get
on,
get
up
to
speed
and
get
that
team
up
to
speed.
To
begin
formulating
our
desires.
For
that
there
will
be
an
outreach
program
that
Laurie's
putting
together.
I
Now
that
will
go
out
in
the
fall
to
begin
the
process
of
community
engagement
as
that
process
begins
to
evolve.
We
look
forward
to
bringing
the
Dutch
team
here
to
a
meeting
in
the
fall
that
they
can
at
least
talk
to
you
about
how
they
go
about
designing
projects
and
get
an
understanding
of
those
sorts
of
things
that
they're
going
to
be
looking
for.
I
So
we've
brought
on
a
consulting
team
to
help
us
look
at
how
you
distribute
those
costs
of
infrastructure
across
all
of
the
development,
residential,
commercial
retail
hotels.
Whatever
development
occurs
in
that
area
so
that
we
can
move
forward
and
get
those
that
infrastructure
in
place
as
development
occurs,
and
so
we
anticipate
hopefully
by
the
end
of
this
year
being
to
the
City
Council,
with
some
recommendations
on
an
initial
phase
of
an
impact
development
impact
fee
and
with
that
I'm
glad
to
answer
any
questions.
I
H
Think
still,
one
of
the
things
that
I'd
like
to
just
get
a
little
bit
more
clarification
on
is
that
the
Greater
Gardner
Domus
Park,
North,
Willow,
Glen
neighborhoods
met
with
high-speed
rail
last
week
and
and
the
presentation
was
strictly
on
the
two
original
routes
that
high-speed
rail
proposed,
which
were
the
at
grade
and
then
the
aerial
route,
and
so
I'd
like
to
know
what
the
thought
is
on.
How
that
that's
gonna
change,
because
everything
that
I
think
we've
been
talking
about
as
the
SOG
brings
in
another
option.
I
B
J
Singular
question
within
our
agency's
purview
to
try
to
answer
that
as
part
of
that
process.
The
reason
that
we're
undertaking
disk
and
working
together
with
the
city
and
with
Caltrain
and
VTA
is
so
that
we
could
actually
look
at
something
bigger
than
that,
and
so
that's
a
you
know,
there's
kind
of
obviously
a
two
parts
of
that
of
that
equation.
J
What
we
see
is
in
that
for
our
project.
We
still
have
to
move
forward
with
looking
at
that
first
piece
of
it,
but
at
the
same
time,
what
we
lie
think
ultimately
want
and
I
think
why
we're
doing
this
process
is
a
is
a
much
bigger
vision
than
just
adding
high-speed
rail
to
the
station,
and
so
that's
what
we're
still
working
through
with
how
those
overlay
and
kind
of
obviously
making
sure
that
it's
the
right
thing
that
ultimately
gets
built.
J
K
I
Will
be
again,
I'm,
not
quite
sure,
I,
fully
understand
the
question
the
dirt
on
station.
That
planning
that
we're
just
starting
out
looking
at
this
first
epoch
is
simply
to
look
at
what
are
the
program
boxes
that
we
need
to
build
to
make
a
station?
That's
the
most
functional,
provides
the
best
customer
service
and
meets
the
urban
design
needs
for
for
the
city
and
the
agencies
it
won't.
We
won't
be
anywhere
near
construction
impacts,
or
even
thinking
about
that
for
many
years
to
come,
the
work
that
the
city
is
doing
with
Bart.
I
I
J
Will
this
body
get
a
chance
to
take
a
look
at
a
first
draft
of
that
before
it
heads
to
Council
and
I'd
recommend
that
be
a
good
idea?
Maybe
in
that
November
meeting
when
we
review
the
integrated
station
concept
and
if
not,
do
you
envision
the
infrastructure
related
recommendations
that
we've
talked
about?
Will
that
be
integrated
into
the
the
staffs
report
to
Council
on
that
fee?
J
L
I
A
question
that
we're
looking
at
right
now
with
City
Public
Works,
the
engineering
firm
that
did
the
initial
analysis
and
the
people
that
are
going
to
do
the
fees
study
to
make
sure
to
see
if
we've
missed
anything
or
what
we
captured
supports
the
conceptual
levels
of
government.
Again,
we
don't
have
a
project
from
Google
or
anyone
else
that
we
can
really
estimate
how
much
of
an
acceleration
there
might
be,
and
development
or
capacity.
C
I
D
M
D
D
Were
told
that
the
city
of
San
Jose
had
hired
different
consultants
to
help
on
the
high-speed
rail
options
and
there
was
two
groups:
one
was
the
one
that
we've
heard
from
mostly
so
far
was
the
at-grade
and
the
aerial
alignments.
But
we've
never
heard
one
thing
about
the
underground
option
and
any
of
the
possibilities
or
problems
with
that
and
I
know
that
the
we
you
know
we,
the
city
of
San,
Jose,
paid
a
lot
of
money.
Hence
taxpayers
paid
a
lot
of
money
for
that
and
we
haven't
heard
zero
on
that.
B
Thank
you
very
much
bill
and
I
want
it
just
to
remind
you
all
we're
keeping
notes
of
all
the
input
that's
being
provided
so
we'll
make
sure
to
get
back
to
you
as
bill
suggested
on
all
the
input
we're
receiving.
So
thank
you
very
much
with
that.
We're
gonna
transition
to
the
report
outs
from
the
jobs
and
education
and
housing
and
displacement
solution
groups.
F
So
we're
structuring
this
report
back
or
these
two
report
backs
the
same
as
we
did
for
the
three
that
we
had
at
last
meeting.
So
I'll
just
quickly
remind
you
that
the
purpose
is
to
give
you
a
summary
of
what
was
discussed.
We
by
no
means
are
capturing
every
comment,
so
we'll
leave
the
it
up
to
the
advisory
group
members
that
were
part
of
the
solution
groups
to
highlight
anything
that
they
feel
is
not
adequately
highlighted
on
these
slides.
F
B
Thank
You
Laurie,
so
we're
gonna
jump
right
into
housing
here,
just
I
want
to
our
job
site.
Look
at
that
I'm
already
off
so
jobs
in
education,
I'm,
so
excited
about
housing.
We're
gonna
get
there
soon
so
quickly.
The
overall
themes
they
were
discussed
by
the
group
and
then
we'll
get
into
some
of
the
desired
outcomes
and
potential
solutions.
B
So
what
this
really
kind
of
boiled
down,
so
we
talked
about
potential
solutions
related
to
these
desired
outcomes,
some
of
which
included
increasing
capacity
and
strength
of
arrange,
a
set
of
networks
to
our
scepters.
Excuse
me:
it's
a
network
and
collaborate
and
our
resources
with
each
other,
so
that
again
there's
that
collab
internally
there
was
a
thought
about
equitable
innovation,
so
linking
sector
companies
with
middle
wage
opportunity
such
as
manufacturing
using
responsible
contractors
that
came
up
a
lot
and
thinking
about
different
ways
and
standards
that
could
help
guide
that
process.
B
We
had
some
ideas
of
watch
groups,
including
responsible
contract
guide.com,
to
ensure
that
good
working
conditions
are
available.
There's
conversation
about
project
labor
agreements
and
establishing
terms
of
conditions
for
employment,
employing
skill,
craft
unions
through
the
construction
phase,
creating
pipelines
again
to
good
jobs,
including
local
apprenticeship
programs,
service
labor
agreements
to
provide
worker
retention
was
also
mentioned.
B
So
a
lot
of
great
information
that
came
out
of
this
and
jool
topic
and
we'll
come
back,
and
we
can
discuss
this
with
a
group
to
make
sure
that
we
have
it
all
covered.
But
then
the
three
others
that
we
covered
again
the
education
system
and
you'll
find
we
did.
The
survey
at
the
end,
you'll,
see
kind
of
how
these
ranked
in
education
came
up
often
is
something
that
we
really
need
to
look
into,
particularly
to
support
local
schools
with
additional
resources
and
innovation.
B
I'm
recognizing
there's
a
good
pipeline
to
good
jobs
here
locally,
so
really,
instead
of
looking
at
Google
or
others
to
develop
new
schools.
Looking
at
how
we
can
support
what
exists
here
locally.
So
we
talked
about
innovation.
We
talked
about
job
training.
We
talked
about
assistive
technology
in
classrooms,
of
how
to
increase
the
capabilities
and
access
students
to
technology,
especially
those
that
might
be
disabled.
B
Oh
here
we
go.
We
also
talked
about
leveraging
Google
platforms
such
as
YouTube
to
address
cyber
bullying,
how
we
could
use
again
the
resources
that
Google
might
have
available,
including
our
increasing
resources
for
restorative
justice
programs,
and
that
was
really
peer,
mentoring
or
social
innovations
for
those,
maybe
troubled
youth
that
are
sometimes
overlooked
and
giving
them
the
resources
to
be
able
to
be
a
active
participant
in
their
schools.
B
Again,
a
lot
about
partnerships
and
mentorship
programs,
especially
taking
advantage
of
having
San,
Jose
State
University
right
here,
and
how
we
can
create
that
partnership
to
again
give
resources
to
to
the
youth
and
others
in
the
area.
And
then
again,
we
talked
a
lot
about
the
resources
that
come
could
come
through.
Innovations
and
tech
excuse
me
technology,
and
we
also
one
member
reference:
creating
potentially
considering
creating
in
lieu
fees
to
support
existing
school
programs.
B
That
covers
most
of
what
I
wanted
to
talk
about.
For
schools,
the
next
was
local
businesses.
There
was
a
strong
desire
to
mitigate
impacts
on
local
businesses
to
ensure
that
nonprofits
and
others
that
are
experiencing
rising
rents
and
wages,
they're
able
to
compete
and
stay
in
this
space
and
stay
local.
B
There
was
conversations
with
members
of
city
staff
to
look
at
what
the
city
is
currently
doing.
Programs,
including
business
ownership,
space
that
connects
immigrants
and
small
businesses
to
resources
and
again
other
technology
and
skill
training
to
give
them
the
foundation
to
be
able
to
stay
here
locally.
Looking
at
again,
its
support
from
nonprofits
to
connect
to
resources,
potentially
preparing
a
community
impact
study
to
determine
again
the
the
influence
between
the
housing
and
jobs,
balance
to
make
sure
that
that
we've
got
that
right.
B
Requiring
we
also
talked
a
little
about
requiring
a
percentage
of
retail
space
to
be
subsidized
for
local
small
businesses.
There
was
examples
brought
up,
for
example,
one
market
in
San
Francisco,
where
a
few
floors
of
the
retail
are
actually
provide
space
for
local
restaurants,
so
thinking
about
examples
that
are
out
there
again
to
help
support
local
businesses
here.
B
We
talked
a
little
about
data
needs
requesting
Google
to
provide
more
data
for
the
types
of
jobs
that
are
created
to
make
sure
there's
a
there's,
a
good
balance
of
a
variety
of
jobs
that
are
that
are
located
here
in
the
city
again
to
allow
for
a
variety
of
workforce
that
would
like
to
stay
here.
Funding
could
be,
could
come
in
the
form
of
community
benefit
agreements,
development
agreements,
commercial
impact
fees
and
and
again
the
infrastructure
assessment
or
district
levia
that
we
talked
about
earlier
to
provide
funding
for
schools
and
then
under
accountability.
B
F
So,
staff,
after
the
two
meetings
with
jobs,
this
job
solution
groups
put
together
a
couple
lists
of
ideas
or
potential
solutions
and
put
them
into
two
groups.
So
one
from
that,
we
then
sent
it
out
to
the
job
solution
group
members
to
make
sure
they
agreed
that
those
two
categories
were
looked
good
and
that
we
characterized
the
ideas
appropriately
and
then
they
went
through
a
ranking
exercise
where
they
were
asked
to
rank
the
top
five
or
six
ideas
based
on
what
they
see
is
most
important.
F
B
Thanks
for
the
setup
Laurie,
that
was
great.
So
a
lot
of
this,
you
already
heard
me
talk
through,
but
again,
this
is
how
they
ranked
when
we
went
through
the
process.
The
first
one
that
came
up
was
was
committing
to
responsible
contracting
standards
to
ensure
that
contract
out
jobs
are
good
quality
and
fair
and
safe
working
conditions.
That
was,
that
was
one
that
was
seen
as
important.
B
We
also
second
on
the
list,
was
to
protect
labor
agreements
which
establish
the
terms
and
conditions
of
employment
for
construction
projects
to
help
ensure
quality
job
opportunities
for
local
workers.
That
came
up
often
in
our
discussions
as
well,
in
other
words,
to
partner
with
local
businesses
in
around
the
deert
on
station
area.
Again
through
catering
events
and
patronage
should
really
give
them
the
resources
they
need
to
work
together.
B
So
if
it
doesn't
happen,
it's
part
of
the
development
what
they
could
fund
to
help
support
other
community
benefits
that
we've
talked
through,
and
this
was
a
top
list
of
the
six
that
came
out
of
that
process
and
one
was
funding
for
early
childhood
education
and
childcare
for
low-income
households.
Next
was
to
increase
resources
for
pre-apprenticeship
and
apprenticeship
programs
and
trade
industries,
so
really
again
creating
that
pipeline
for
folks
increasing
a
fee
or
levy
to
generate
extra
revenues
for
local
existing
schools
to
use
as
the
district
sees
fit,
as
I
mentioned
earlier.
B
K
That's
coming
into
downtown
can
do
when
I
look
back
at
Adobe
I
look
at
the
Sharks
I
look
at
Oracle.
You
could
look
at
any
number
of
big
employers
that
have
come
into
the
downtown.
We
didn't
put
any
of
these
rules
and
regulations
on
them
and
to
me,
I
can't
think
it's
absurd
to
put
these
things
up
there
on
Google.
Now
that
all
said,
Google's
coming
in
and
they're
gonna
be
a
big
part
of
our
community
and
I
think
we
need
to
work
with
them.
K
L
C
Sarah
McDermott
South
Bay,
Labor,
Council
I.
Second,
that
I
think
that
the
point
of
this
is
to
say
how
can
Google
be
a
good
partner,
and
my
understanding
is
that
Google's
interested
in
that
answer,
so
we
should
be
providing
them
with
the
best
list
we
can
of
how
we
think
they
can
be
a
really
solid
community
partner.
I.
Also,
don't
think
that
we
should
be
negotiating
against
ourselves.
There's
something.
Google
doesn't
want
to
do.
C
I'm
sure
they're,
going
to
tell
us
that,
but
right
now,
I
haven't
heard
anything
from
Google
about
what
they
will
or
will
not
do
so.
I,
don't
want
us
to
sit
here
and
think
about
that.
That's
Google's
job
to
tell
us
that
and
I
look
forward
to
hearing
from
them.
But
the
point
here
is
for
us
to
really
say
these
are
standards
that
we
think
would
really
make
this
great
for
San
Jose.
J
There's
there's
a
there's
a
tremendous
amount
of
energy
around
it,
and
so
a
lot
of
ideas
that
are
floated
but
I,
don't
think
we
should
lose
sight
of
these
ideas
around
responsible,
contracting
and
job
standards
and
really
focusing
on
the
kind
of
Workforce
Investment
issues
that
that
target
our
lowest
income
and
most
vulnerable
populations.
Great.
B
Thank
You
Jeffery,
that's
a
great
point
and
there
are
a
lot
of
great
models
out
there
to
want
to
bring
to
light
as
a
resource
that
we
could
be
part
of
the
comprehensive
report
at
the
end
out
that
we
we
kind
of
show
the
resources
that
are
available
so
models
that
the
city
and
others
could
potentially
follow.
Were
there
any
other
comments
from
those
that
were
on
the
job
solution
group,
if
not
any
other
comments
from
the
SOG
group
in
general,
any
other
thoughts
you
have
on
the
the
job
solutions
that
we
came
up
with.
G
One
thing
that
I
think
would
be
interesting
to
explore
and
I.
Don't
know
if
this
is
part
of
the
conversation
is
Google's
unique
strengths
as
a
company
and
how
those
might
be
brought
to
bear
here.
So
one
area
that
that
comes
in
mind
for
me,
that
I
think
is
especially
important
and
we
should
be
thinking
about
as
a
community.
More
generally
is
computer
science,
education
in
our
k12
system-
that,
as
we
think
about
how
technology
is
changing
our
society
and
what
it
means
for
work
for
any
number
of
these
things
in
the
long
term.
G
It's
important
that
students,
the
next
generation,
understand
the
technologies
that
shape
our
world,
and
that
will
happen
with
the
k-12
computer
science.
Education
Google
is
already
as
a
company
invested
in
that,
and
that
could
be
an
interesting
thing
to
leverage
in
some
of
these
conversations.
Great.
B
J
Thank
you,
Nathan
hope
from
the
Silicon
Valley
leadership
group
looks
to
be
a
very
rich
discussion.
Just
want
to
thank
those
that
took
the
extra
time
to
sit
on
this
additional
committee.
To
then
thank
you
for
for
your
input
on
that.
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
one
thing
that
I
didn't
see
on
the
list
was
the
context
of
jobs
that
that
we're
very
excited
for
the
jobs
to
come.
J
We're
very
excited
for
the
opportunity
for
a
very
vibrant
downtown
and
that
just
to
understand,
as
Charlie
put
out
there,
that
this
is
kind
of
new
space.
Why
don't
want
to
appreciate
Google
and
and
other
large
employers
being
part
of
this
process?
This
is
new
for
all
of
us.
I
think,
as
we've
all
learned
through
the
various
and
now
seven
meetings,
but
I
just
want
to
commend.
You
know
the
partners
at
the
table.
I
think
that's
the
word.
J
You
know
it's
partnering
going
forward
and
really
having
a
dialogue
that
this
was
something
that
was
not
done
in
the
past
in
terms
of
robust
community
input,
and
this
is
an
opportunity
for
us
to
have
that
conversation
in
the
context
of
what's
doable,
understanding
that
there
wasn't
a
project
yet
to
be
negotiated,
but
that
this
is
early
and
and
as
we
move
forward
to
to
look
at
look
for
those
opportunities
and
be
excited
about
it
throughout.
Wherever
we
land
great.
O
Thank
you
very
much,
I
mean
I,
think
these
I
think
these
standards,
or
whatever
you
want
to
call
it
at
some
point.
I
think
it
will
become.
Standards
are
legitimate
in
terms
of
you
know.
This
group,
as
well
as
the
general
community,
are
concerned
with,
with
such
a
big
corporation
coming
and
potentially
coming
to
downtown,
but
I
have
to
agree
with
what
Charlie,
if
I
said
in
terms
of
the
rules
and
the
implications
and
the
hardships
and
all
these
challenges
that
we
are
talking
about
providing
for
a
corporation.
Yes,
this
is
Google.
O
This
is
a
multinational
international
corporations
and
they
have
to
go
through
all
these
concerns
that
we
have
in
challenges.
But
what,
if
it's
not
Google?
What?
If
it's
like
a
medium
sized
corporations?
What,
if
it's
another
corporation
to
look
at
what
they
have
to
go
through
as
compared
to
Adobe
or
some
of
the
other
companies
that
come
to
San
Jose,
it's
quite
challenging,
even
for
a
company
like
Google,
so
I
think
in
the
context
of
the
city,
sounds
like
wanting
more
corporations
to
come,
not
just
to
downtown
but
to
the
city
in
general.
O
We
have
not
really
showed
that
we
want
Google
to
come
to
downtown.
Why
is
that
I
think
that
if
you
actually
go
out
there
into
the
community,
ask
people
in
any
particular
community
for
a
company
to
come
to
someone's
they
provide
different
types
of
jobs?
It's
not
just.
This
is
not
just
a
Google
factor.
This
is
everything
that
happens
if
Google
comes
or
another
company
comes
to
San
Jose
we're
looking
at
potential
construction,
jobs,
retail
jobs,
all
the
things
that
could
happen
because
of
a
corporation
coming
to
the
city.
O
So
we
have
to
look
at
all
those
aspects
and
impacts
as
well
and
I.
Don't
think
we
really
had
a
conversations
around
that
and
then
finally
I
just
wanted
to
say
also
as
a
former
elected
official
who
actually
served
here
at
the
city
of
San
Jose.
We
constantly
want
to
go
out
and
ask
taxpayers
to
approve
bonds
measures.
General
obligations
points
so
that
we
can
pay
for
infrastructures
and
improvements
in
the
city
of
San
Jose.
Imagine
if
we
have
a
corporations
like
this,
so
many
corporations
coming
in.
O
We
can
generate
those
tax
revenues
for
the
city
of
San
Jose.
In
order
to
channel
that
money
to
provide
infrastructure
improvements
for
residents.
We
have
to
talk
about
those
things.
These
are
fine,
but
I
think
they
balance.
The
equation
has
to
be
balanced.
We
have
to
hear
both
sides
of
stories.
I.
Think
more
people
needs
to
speak
up
about
the
not
just
the
implications
of
Google
coming
to
San
Jose,
but
also
the
benefits
that
corporations
like
this
can
bring
to
our
city
into
our
residents.
Great.
N
K
You
for
this
list
and
all
this
input
coming
into
this
midway
through
all
of
these
groups,
have
provided
some
phenomenal
input
to
this
process
and
I'm
really
impressed
with
the
quality
of
that
input
to
Sara's
point
absolutely.
We
are
here
to
listen,
and
that
is
still
the
mode
that
we're
in
until
a
project
is
actually
moving
forward
and
and
the
negotiations
are
actually
happening.
K
So
that's
that's
not
part
of
my
job
here
so
I'm
here
to
listen,
take,
notes
and
and
make
sure
that
we're
here
to
be
a
partner
and
be
a
good
part
of
the
community
in
general
and
I
think
you
know
this
is
an
exciting
opportunity
for
everybody,
and
especially
for
us
as
as
a
participant
and
not
just
the
the
catalyst
I
guess
so
with
that.
You
know,
I'll
always
be
here
and
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
me
and
thank.
J
Jeff
working
partnerships,
he
was
like,
hopefully,
folks,
artists,
a
chance
to
see
in
your
packet.
There
was
a
Bloomberg
article
that
was
was
attached
around
the
recent
analysis.
Looking
at
Google's
global
work,
force
and
Bloomberg
found,
half
of
Google's
workforce
is
actually
contractors
at
this
point,
which
is
you
know
something
of
a
bit
of
a
surprise.
I,
don't
think
that's
a
particularly
a
norm
for
for
corporate
America,
but
I
think
it
just
really
highlights.
We've
heard
some
comments
here
tonight
of
should
we
expect
what
should
we
expect
of
Google?
J
J
We
should
treat
Google
like
any
other
developer.
If
there's
another
developer,
that
steps
up
with
a
project,
that's
eight
million
square
feet
that
involves
over
20
acres
of
public
land
around
you
know,
basically
surrounding
about
half
of
our
cities,
single
largest
historical
infrastructure
investment,
then
yeah
I
think
we
should
be
having
the
same
kind
of
conversation
around
that
development.
J
Perhaps
we
need
to
be
thinking
about
other
large
developments
happening
in
the
d
sap
and
what
we
should
be
looking
more
than
then
than
what
we
have
now,
given
the
lack
of
a
kind
of
system
around
value
capture,
the
lack
of
anything
like
a
commercial
linkage
fee
to
actually
pay
for
the
impacts
when
it
comes
to
affordable
housing
yeah.
We
should
probably
do
that
too,
but,
let's
not
back
off
the
the
problems
are
too
big.
The
concerns
of
the
community
are
too
large.
Sorry
for
the
monologue,
but
we
engaged
a
thousand
City
residents
here.
J
J
B
N
N
K
K
This
on
this
committee,
our
purpose
is
to
provide
input
and
our
thoughts
and
ideas
to
the
City
Council,
who
will
then
make
this
decision
and
move
forward
with
the
negotiation,
so
I,
think
being
as
comprehensive
as
possible
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
I
really
appreciate.
Google's
involvement,
incredible
amount
of
involvement,
not
only
in
these
meetings,
but
in
the
community,
you
know
being
super
visible,
super
engaged
and
that
collaboration
is
exactly
what
we
as
a
city
deserve,
and
what
this
I
think
was
going
to
is
going
to
make
this
process
successful.
K
It's
we've
said
it
here
before,
but
when
we
spurred
took
a
study
tour
to
the
Netherlands
and
France
last
year.
One
of
the
comments
that
just
really
resonated
with
us
on
the
topic
of
collaboration
is
everyone
will
get
less
than
they
expend
they
wanted,
but
more
than
they
expected.
That's
what
I'm
hoping
thank.
E
Like
the
other
speakers
have
said,
we
need
to
raise
the
bar
look
at
the
issues
that
are
going
to
come
in
terms
of
displacement,
jobs
that
don't
match
the
requirements
for
housing
in
the
area,
etcetera,
etcetera
and
let
all
the
people
that
are
coming
into
this
area
know.
This
is
what
San
Jose
needs.
Frankly,
we've
in
the
past
tried
to
do
it
out
of
the
city
budget
and
we
failed
miserably
on
once
the
art,
Redevelopment
Agency
went
away.
B
F
So
I'm
gonna
jump
right
into
desired
outcomes,
because
we
did
already
do
a
preliminary
report
back
from
the
housing
solution
group
where
we
went
into
more
detail
on
the
concerns
and
issues
that
the
group
talked
about,
as
well
as
the
specific
desired
outcomes.
So,
in
general,
the
desired
outcomes
fall
into
two
Geographic
scales.
One
is
the
localized
immediate
area
surrounding
the
Deardon
station.
F
The
focus
on
that
is
to
discourage
displacement,
including
direct
displacement
from
redevelopment
and
to
preserve
the
wide
variety
of
homes
and
character
that
exists
in
the
nearby
neighborhoods
on
a
citywide
scale.
There's
the
group
was
talked
about
this
a
lot
and
in
terms
of
this
being
a
big
opportunity
to
address
the
house,
and
while
the
city
has
existing
programs
and
policies
that
help
with
that
they,
the
group
said
that
we
need
more
and
stronger
tools
and
encouraged
us
to
be
bold
and
addressing
displacement
and
generating
more
affordable
housing
throughout
the
city.
F
So
the
potential
solutions
that
the
group
discussed
fall
into
these
three
general
categories
first,
is
the
ongoing
role
of
the
city
and
its
partners,
including
many
of
you
in
dressing
the
housing
crisis.
Next,
our
guiding
principles
for
development
of
the
Deardon
station
area.
So
this
is
what
would
apply
to
developers
or
development
and
the
specifically
within
the
boundaries
that
we're
looking
at
the
third
bucket
kind
of
combines,
the
two:
it
would
apply
its
developers
in
the
Deardon
station
area,
but
think
about
how
any
new
financial
resources
that
are
generated
through
development.
F
So
the
first
couple
slides
here
show
you
examples
of
the
ideas
that
were
discussed
in
terms
of
the
role
of
the
city
and
its
partners.
So
the
city
is
already
working
on
many
of
these
things
through
the
housing
crisis,
response,
work
plan
or
the
affordable
housing
investment
plan,
and
they
generally
relate
to
increasing
the
speed
of
which
housing
is
constructed,
especially
affordable
housing
and
it
also
increases
or
the
city,
is
looking
at
how
to
increase
resources
on
how
to
preserve
housing
and
create
creased
funding
for
the
production
and
preservation
of
housing.
F
A
the
last
kind
of
subcategory
here
in
terms
of
what
the
city's
working
on
is
anti
displacement
policies
and
tools.
So
an
example
of
that
is
increasing,
section,
8,
voucher,
acceptance
among
landlords,
so
the
city
is
partnering,
with
policy
link
and
several
other
cities
nationwide
to
look
at
the
effectiveness
of
anti
displacement
measures,
and
so
the
ultimate
goal
is
for
the
city
to
come
back
later
in
2019,
with
a
plan
that
reflects
the
work
that
they're
doing
with
policy
link.
F
So
this
next
category
here
are
the
main
ideas
that
the
group
discussed
in
terms
of
principles
that
would
apply
to
development
in
the
Deardon
station
area.
So
the
group
generally
agreed
that
we
need
to
maximize
the
high-density
housing
in
the
station
area
and
at
the
third
meeting
we
had.
There
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
this
topic
and
wanting
to
make
sure
you
know
who
is
that
housing
intended
to
serve?
Is
it
new
employees
of
offices
in
the
Deardon
area
commuters?
F
So
the
the
main
takeaway
from
that
discussion
was
that
the
housing
should
be
inclusive
to
both
local
workers
and
Deardon
commuters.
Recognizing
that
being
near
Deardon
station
has
a
lot
of
value
to
people
and
should
really
take
advantage
of
that
both
on
the
jobs
and
housing
side
of
things.
So
the
next
principle
here
is
that
any
inclusionary
unit
should
be
built
on
site
rather
than
being
paid
out
as
an
in
lieu
fee.
F
F
The
last
item
on
this
list
is
to
contribute
resources
to
address
the
housing
issues
and
provide
community
benefits,
and
so
the
group
talked
about
the
several
ways
in
which
this
could
play
out
from
a
process
standpoint.
The
potential
mechanisms
for
generating
these
new
resources
could
be
through
a
development
agreement,
community
benefits
agreement,
revenue
from
land
transactions
and
commercial
linkage
fee.
F
F
Beginning
with
oh
and
I
should
mention
that
these
were
our
weighted
results.
So
not
just
the
number
of
times
an
idea
rose
up
in
someone's
top
five,
but
we
actually
weighted
the
ones
that
received
a
one
ranking
higher
than
the
ones
that
received
a
five
ranking.
So
I
can
go
through
that
in
more
detail,
if
you
want,
but
just
to
clarify,
that
was
a
suggestion
that
we
got
after
the
parks.
Ranking
group
was
to
rank
them.
So
you
tried
that
here
so
with
that.
F
F
F
B
B
K
D
Probably
wonder
what
in
the
world
were
you
doing
there
Kevin,
because
this
sounds
like
there's
a
potential
to
quote
acquire
the
existing
surrounding
neighborhoods
and
turn
them
from
like
single-family
residences
and
say,
are
two
duplexes
into
multifamily
dwellings
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we,
as
a
group,
did
say
that
we
are
going
to
protect
the
existing
neighborhoods
from
this
sort
of
thing.
Because
not
everybody
wants
to
live
in
high-density
housing.
Some
people
choose
to
live
in
single-family
residences,
and
that
is
an
important
part
of
the
housing
solution
for
San
Jose.
J
B
J
Folks,
so
I
think
what
with
that
point,
we
really
wanted
to
say
that
not
just
directed
displacement,
but
we
should
make
sure
there's
a
goal
of
zero
displacement
in
direct
displacement
or
direct
displacement.
But
there
should
be
a
plan
to
really
ensure
that
we're
seeing
zero
displacement
come
out
of
this
project
was
a
goal
that
we
had
a
pretty
robust
conversation
around,
but
there
was
strong
support
for,
even
though
it
wasn't
in
the
prioritization
exercise.
I
hope
that
would
be
reflected
and
then
just
a
kind
of
clerical
suggestion
in
future
presentations.
J
B
C
So,
just
like
suggestion
bullet
point
number
three
build
high
density
outside
of
the
Ariston
station,
including
East
Side.
It's
so
we
can
keep
our
nice
single-family
homes
here
on
the
west
side
and
build
more
densely
on
the
east
side
and
I
just
want
to
say.
The
loss
on
Alameda
doesn't
support
that
we
support
housing
for
everyone
at
all
ranges,
especially
here
at
dear
Don
Station.
C
This
and
the
idea
that
the
verbage
on
the
bullet
point
has
been
consistent
and
it's
pretty
exclusionary
and
saying
that
the
housing
is
going
to
be
built
outside
of
there
Don
and
the
clarification
that
I
got
during
when
we
were
ranking,
and
we
were
voting
that
that
was
not
the
intent
and
if
that's
the
case
that
that's
not
the
intent,
then
I
would
strongly
encourage
staff
to
reflect
the
record,
because
this
was
not
what
I
voted
on
when
and
my
understanding
was.
This
was
the
intent
that
the
group
voted
on
when
we
were
ranking.
G
San
Jose
downtown
residents
Association
just
bringing
back
into
the
discussion
one
of
the
points
that
came
out
of
the
forum
that
we
had
on
August,
2nd
around
the
homelessness
question
and
specifically
around
mental
illness
and
substance
abuse.
I.
Don't
necessarily
see
that
entirely
reflected
here.
I.
Imagine
that
discussion
happened
in
the
workgroup
space,
but
I
do
think.
That's
a
really
critical
piece
of
this
that
should
be
folded
in
somewhere.
H
K
P
K
B
F
Jump
in
here
and
Kristen
can
elaborate,
but
I
would
say
this.
A
lot
of
people
are
paying
close
attention
to
what's
being
said
at
this
at
these
meetings
and
the
housing
department
is
you
know
right
there
with
us,
so
it's
already
shaping
the
work
that
I
shouldn't
say:
shaping
and
forming
an
ongoing
effort.
So
one
of
those
is
the
anti
displacement
work,
that's
being
with
policy
link
that
I
mentioned.
K
Hi
Kristen
Clements
of
the
housing
department
I,
will
just
add
that
the
housing
crisis
response
work
plan
that
the
administration
jointly
has
brought
forward
and
back
to
council
and
we're
gonna
be
reporting
every
six
months
on
progress
on
that
and
some
of
the
concepts
like
increased
production,
make
development
easier.
Look
at
certain
policies.
K
J
School
district
I
think
one
of
the
themes
that's
been
consistent
with
this
group
is
diversity
of
opinions
and
I
agree
with
the
point
that
we're
trying
to
forecast
potentially
30
years
of
the
future
right
now
today
and
both
of
the
solution
groups
that
presented
tonight
mentioned
fees
and
I've
mentioned
this
before
I.
Do
think
that
may
be
the
best
path
to
satisfy
all
the
diverse
opinions
and
current
desires
is
some
sort
of
ongoing
mitigation
or
impact
fee
that
allows
the
city
to
respond
to
needs
as
they
arise.
J
The
housing
market
is
completely
different
now
than
it
was
15
years
ago,
and
it
may
be
completely
different
again
in
15
years,
and
is
there
a
way
to
not
capture
a
one-time
solution
with
this
development,
but
an
ongoing
way
to
have
the
city
be
in
this
place,
work
and
respond
to
future
needs,
because
this
once-in-a-lifetime
opportunity
is
generating
some
sort
of
mitigation
impact
to
address
the
future.
We
don't
know
and
I
think
Jeffries
brought
up
an
excellent
point
that
I
repeat
all
the
time.
J
Whoever
builds
around
dear
Don
is
going
to
benefit
from
hundreds
of
millions,
if
not
billions,
of
public
infrastructure.
There
should
be
some
way
to
offset
the
impact
on
the
community
I'm
just
worried.
If
we
try
to
do
it
now
in
10
or
15
years,
we're
gonna
have
missed
something
we
wish
you
could
do
and
just
very
briefly,
the
school
district
has
a
system.
That's
similar,
there's
a
developer
fee,
every
time,
someone
remodels
a
residential
property
or
adds
commercial
development.
J
We
collect
a
developer
fee
that
sits
an
account
and
allows
the
school
district
to
adjust
for
school
construction
as
we
go
through
changes
around
us
and
that
fee
is
a
little
bit
more
nimble
and
flexible,
and
we
collected
an
ongoing
basis,
so
I
saw
both
groups
have
that
and
I
think
that
is
a
better
way
to
unify.
What
are
a
lot
of
great
comments
in
this
room?
Otherwise,
I'm
worried
will
not
be
able
to
reach
a
consensus
and
potentially
not
get
an
outcome
that
is
sustainable
for
20
or
30
years.
K
High
density
housing
in
the
Deardon
station
area
and
and
not
limited
only
to
that
area
and
that
other
areas
that
are
well
served
by
transit
and
we
talked
about
that
east-west
corridor
as
one
of
the
concepts
of
the
Google
development
about
connecting
the
east
and
the
west
sides
of
the
city
as
an
example
of
a
transit
rich
area
that
could
and
should
densify
if
it
was
near
transit.
That's
my
recollection.
C
B
D
Think
of
the
beginning
of
this
month,
I
attended
a
Caltrans
meeting
that
was
over
here
in
the
dome,
and
one
of
the
interesting
points
that
came
out
of
that
meeting
was
the
fact
that,
in
spite
of
what
we're
trying
to
do
here,
we're
not
getting.
We
have
a
housing
crisis,
so
big
that,
even
if
we
were
able
to
enact
all
the
things
that
we
want
to
do
now,
we
probably
cannot
keep
up
with
the
problem
that
we
have
and
I
thought
one
of
the
interesting
solutions
to
the
problem,
at
least
on
a
short-term
basis.
D
D
They
are.
They
are
inhumane
and
I
I,
don't
like
what
I
see
happening
in
this
city.
In
that
regard,
it's
painful
to
see
people
who
want
to
have
someplace
to
live,
build
some
fairly
innovative
structures
and
then
have
them
torn
down
just
to
show
up
again.
You
know
in
two
and
a
half
three
weeks,
so
it's
kind
of
a
waste
of
resources,
I
believe
to
continue.
D
E
On
point
number:
three:
the
2040
envision
General
Plan
Update
task
force,
struggled
for
four
years
and
worked
with
city
planners
and
and
all
kinds
of
consultants
and
all
kinds
of
consultants
to
find
the
places
where
high-density
housing
would
be
appropriate.
We
call
them
now
they
are
been
villages
and
we're
grading
urban
village
plans
and-
and
certainly
the
area
around
dear
Adan
is
part
of
that.
But
there
are
other
places
along
the
corridor
as
a
long
transportation,
etc.
C
The
very
specific
element
of
that:
yes,
we
absolutely
need
to
be
continuing
to
explore
every
possible
tool
in
our
toolbox
and
working
with
the
city
of
San
Jose
and
using
our
public
policy
tools,
but
ultimately
we
also
need
to
be
very
clear
on
what
the
role
of
Google
isn't
all
this
and
I
think
what
has
come
up
in
our
subcommittees
and
I'm,
hoping
you
know
in
our
conversations
in
our
with
our
base
is
that
we
are
looking
for
community
benefits
agreements.
I
can
actually
do
that.
B
C
Nadya's
either
the
Law
Foundation
of
Silicon
Valley
just
want
to
echo
it
Murry
Noel
said
it.
Thank
you
all
for
all
of
your
work
on
coming
up
with
some
of
the
solutions
that
we
need
for
the
housing
crisis.
I
just
want
to
echo
that
it's
happening
now
and
it's
I
just
looked
at
the
data
from
our
office
for
the
past
three
months
about
where
people
are
getting
evicted
and
if
you
look
at
the
top
10
zip
codes,
they're
all
in
the
dirt
in
station
area,
so
displacement
is
happening.
It's
happening
now.
C
B
So
if
there
aren't
any
other
comments
again,
thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
If
we
can
give
the
group
and
applause
for
all
the
hard
work.
Thank
you
so
much
so
now
we're
gonna
transition.
Don't
look
at
that!
We're
actually
going
to
transition.
The
public
comment
and,
as
mentioned
earlier,
I'm
going
to
read
off
at
least
the
first
five
or
six
names
I
believe
most,
everyone
is
in
the
room.
We
got
some
comment
cars
from
the
outside,
if
you
aren't
here,
please
come
in.
B
If
you
hear
your
name
and
start
to
line
up
here
and
we'll
put
a
mic
here
for
you,
so
you
can
have
time
for
your
comments.
As
a
reminder,
we
have
a
two-minute
clock
up
there
right
in
front
of
you.
If
you
could
please
stay
within
that
two
minutes.
We
greatly
appreciate
it.
So
here
we
go
if
Blair
Beekman,
Jeremy
Taylor
Gayle,
awesomer
Robert
acquires
sandy
Perry
and
Glen
Abrams
could
start
lining
up.
M
Hi
I
guess
I'm
gonna
go
first,
I
wanted
to
speak
on
issues
that
we're
spoken
about
in
the
beginning
of
the
meeting,
so
I
guess
this
is
appropriate.
There
was
very
nice
ideas
mentioned
about
the
ideas
from
the
first
set
of
slides.
You
are
showing
that
you
want
to
possibly
learn
how
to
work
those
ideas
within
current
models
of
the
city
of
San
Jose.
M
I
have
not
been
too
impressed
with
how
you've
been
working
and
you're
thinking,
you're
ready
to
build
a
big
bright,
new,
downtown,
San
Jose
and
you
are
really
excluding
and
like
possibly
trying
to
exterminate
the
the
homeless,
downtown
population
and
I'm
really
hurt
by
the
technology.
You
want
to
employ
down
there
to
basically
spy
on
them
and
basically
insult
them
and
basically
practice
law
enforcement
on
them.
That
I
feel
is
not
the
right
way
to
go.
M
City
of
San
Jose
downtown
in
my
feeling
has
an
incredible
tradition
of
really
respecting
its
downtown
and
practicing
good
ideas
and
adverse
activist
II,
and
you
know
social
health
programs,
all
the
good
stuff.
You
know
that
we
grew
up
with
and
it's
just
it's
a
tradition
of
downtown
and
you
guys
want
to
blow
it
away
at
this
time
by
using
technology
to
just
wipe
them
out
and
I'm
really
insulted
by
the
way.
You're
working
and
I
hope
we
can
have
a
good
long
discussion
how
we're
going
to
make
that
bridge
to
the
future.
M
H
Everybody
comes
back
when
that's
public
comment:
okay,
my
name
is
Gail
Ozma
and
there
are
many
many
wrongs
with
this
whole
Google
project,
starting
with
the
déplacement
of
hundreds
of
families,
but
the
worst
is
de
placing
like
Paul,
said
and
talked
about
the
mentally
ill.
The
Julian
Street
in
the
Julian
Street
Inn
has
been
on
the
corner
of
Julian
behind
the
stadium
for
over
thirty
years,
and
there
are
homeless,
mentally
ill
people
living
there.
Now
I
don't
know
what's
going
on,
but
they
are
gonna,
be
selling
it,
and
so
what
are
they?
H
Gonna
do
be
more
homeless
on
the
street.
That's
what
we
need
more
homeless
since
we'll
be
getting
a
lot
more
homeless.
With
this
whole
Google
project,
there
has
to
be
an
alternative
that
before
they
shut
down,
the
Julian
Street
in
the
owners
have
to
be
held
accountable
and
built
another
shelter
for
the
mentally
ill,
like
they
have
now
or
find
permanent,
affordable
housing,
and
that
should
all
be
done
and
put
to
bed
because
before
they
close
the
shelter.
This
is
really
an
injustice.
H
I,
don't
know
what
they're
gonna
do,
but
they
can't
if
they
close
it,
they
have
to
have
a
housing
or
another
shelter.
Also,
I
don't
hear
anything
about
senior
affordable
housing.
There
are
old
people
like
myself
that
are
good,
not
I'm,
not
but
gonna
be
the
place.
We
need
affordable
or
low
income
housing
for
seniors.
Thank
you.
M
Thank
you
for
this
opportunity,
I'd
like
to
address
a
couple
of
things
that
I
think.
First
of
all,
Kevin
I
want
to.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
mention
of
the
the
houseless
people
and
the
problems
we're
experiencing
with
them.
I
see
once
again,
a
referee
for
the
houseless
Shannon
Holloway
is
gone.
I
haven't
heard
any
input
from
him.
I
don't
know
if
he's
done
anything
in
writing
or
whatever,
but
we
don't
really
have
true
representation.
The
houseless
people
have
representation
at
this
table.
M
If
we
don't
have
somebody
that's
here,
and
it
speaks
up
for
us,
that's
the
voice
that
we're
being
robbed
of
okay.
So
another
thing
is
that
I
want
to
talk
about
is
how
the
the
number
of
homeless
houseless
people
that
are
living
outdoors
right
now
in
this
exact
area
and
how
we're
going
to
treat
them
now.
I
know
that
there
are
second
Street.
Studios
is
the
place
where
they're
putting
people
from
st.
James
Park,
but
there's
a
lot
more
people
in
this
downtown
area
that
are
being
affected.
I,
like
the
idea
of
the
sanction.
M
B
L
Policymaker
scholar,
professor
advocate,
is
in
favor
of
displacement
or
says
it's
a
good
policy
displacement
destroys
communities,
it
disrupts
culture,
it
tears
families
apart,
it
damages
the
environment,
it
ruins
people's
quality
of
life
and
an
undermines
Economic
Opportunity.
It
increases
inequality
and
it
increases
homelessness.
L
I
still
see
no
indication
from
either
Google
or
from
city
staff
that
they
intend
to
take
any
action
to
stop
this
displacement
from
happening.
It's
incomprehensible
that
this
body
would
endorse
a
project
that
will
increase
displacement
and,
in
fact,
I
am
specifically
asking
you,
as
people
of
conscience,
to
take
a
vote
to
recommend
that
City
Council
not
sell
or
lease
any
land
to
Google
without
a
guarantee
that
it
will
not
cause
displacement.
L
L
It's
it's
Silicon
Valley,
a
Sunnyvale,
City
Councilman
person
told
people
to
get
out
if
they
don't
work
for
the
tech
industry
survey
show
that
most
people
in
San
Jose
blame
the
tech
companies
and
the
real
estate
developers
for
the
housing
crisis,
and
if
anybody
should
get
out,
it
should
be
them.
Thank
you.
J
A
J
J
More
affordable
housing
for
low-income,
very
low
income
people
and
hiring
from
this
community,
obviously
both
tech
jobs,
but
for
all
those
other
jobs,
it's
more
to
support
a
large
company
I,
also
and
I'm.
Looking
at
the
clock
here,
I
take
transit,
pretty
much
daily
Adira
Don
and
Tammy
Ann.
It's
really
difficult.
I
get
up
by
method
station,
usually
at.
J
B
Q
Good
evening,
sac
members,
my
name
is
Diana
Salazar
I'm
an
organizer
here
at
take
your
heart.
You
know,
I've
been
really
skeptical
of
this
process
from
the
beginning
and
I
feel
like
there's
an
imbalance
of
power,
and
it's
still
unclear
how
any
of
these
meetings
will
shape
the
decisions
that
Google
in
the
city
will
ultimately
make.
But
here
we
are
again
right.
C
Q
Q
Even
we
couldn't
even
answer
half
of
the
facilitators
questions,
because
it
assumed
that
we
will
still
be
here
and
for
the
city
to
then
insinuate
that
we
won't
be
displaced
because
of
all
the
protections
renters
have
was
honestly
a
slap
in
the
face,
not
only
because
they
misled
the
audience
to
think
that
all
of
the
protections
that
they
had
applied
to
all
renters,
but
also
because
the
community
made
those
protections
happen,
not
the
city.
We
fought
for
those
rights
just,
however,
here
right
now
fighting
for
a
right
to
be
here.
Q
Q
I
honestly
did
not
know
that
development
without
displacement
was
even
achievable,
but
after
meeting
community
leaders
that
made
it
happen
in
their
own
cities,
I
think
that
that
ask
of
you
tonight
is
not
far-fetched
at
all,
but
I
could
only
happen
if
the
decisions
that
are
being
made
are
made
by
those
directly
impacted,
so
I
hope
tonight
is
the
night
to
be
critical
of
this
development
and
its
impact
they
might
have
on
our
public
schools
housing
crisis.
We
must
never
prioritize
profits
and
I
aesthetics
of
a
building
over
people's
dignity
and
right
to
shelter.
C
C
K
Thank
you
good
evening.
My
name
is
Bill
James
I
am
the
chairman
of
the
Santa
Clara
County
Democratic
Party,
where
a
party
of
four
almost
formed
a
thousand
voters
here
in
Santa,
Clara
County,
representing
nearly
half
of
the
registered
voters
in
the
county,
I
want
to
draw
a
picture
of
you
it
for
you.
If
you
haven't
done
it
yet.
Members
of
this
group
I
encourage
you
to
do
it.
Go
down
to
palo
alto
downtown
start
at
home
avenue
there
by
stanford,
where
a
lot
of
google
engineers
are
trained
and
drive
down.
El
Camino,
Real
South.
K
All
the
way
to
shoreline
Boulevard
in
Mountain
View
make
a
left
and
proceed
all
the
way
to
Google's
campus.
You
will
see
that
that
route
is
literally
lined
with
recreational
vehicles
in
which
people
are
living
for
the
lack
of
housing
options
for
them
in
those
areas,
and
the
shocking
thing
that
we
found
is
that
the
the
residents
there
are
not
are
not
homeless
there
they're
out
in
tent
communities
and
improvised
communities.
Many
of
them
are
Google
engineers
and
employees
and
contractors
or
contractors
and
employees
of
other
tech
companies.
K
This
is
the
future
that
you
risk
for
San
Jose,
if
you're
not
careful
to
get
required
behavior
and
cooperation
from
the
company
as
a
part
of
this
deal.
I've
heard
tonight
concerns
expressed
about
the
magnitude
of
the
project
and
it's
a
great
project,
but
they
will
bring
a
lot
of
issues
that
you'll
need
to
address.
I
want
to
let
you
know
the
Santa
Clara
County
Democratic
Party
has
joined
with
Silicon
Valley,
rising
through
a
resolution
brought
to
us
by
youth
delegates
and
passed
by
the
Central
Committee.
K
The
Santa
Clara
County
Democratic
Party
supports
Silicon
Valley's,
rising,
advocacy
and
outreach
to
represent
community
interests
and
whole
tech
companies
accountable
for
the
role
in
economic
inequality,
displacement
and
gentrification
I'll
be
sure
to
provide
the
full
resolution
to
the
staff
of
the
group.
I
asked
you
to.
Please
ensure
that
there
are
required
behaviors
over
time
that
can
be
enforced
through
an
enforceable
agreement.
The
company
may
do
good
things
as
a
good
citizen.
It
will
do
that
which
it's
required
by
agreement
to
do.
P
Good
evening
I'm,
a
long-term
resident
of
San
Jose
I'm,
a
grandma
and
I-
am
a
lawyer
and
I'm
here
to
talk
about
one
of
the
things
that
concerns
me
about
this
issue
of
we're
gonna
get
this
fixed
because
we've
been
to
this
we've
been
through
this
before
20
years
ago,
when
Anderson
dam,
overtopped,
Coyote,
Creek
flooded,
duh,
that's
what
happens.
There
were
public
meetings,
the
city
promised
they
promised
everybody.
It
would
never
happen
again
promised
the
folks
at
Rock
Springs.
They
promised
everybody
an
order,
never
happen
again
in
a
way.
P
That
was
true
because
what
happened
last
year
was
thousand
times
worse
memories.
Faded
people
decided
well,
we
think
we
have
this
covered.
It
was
a
serious
problem
and
it
made
a
lot
worse
what,
among
other
things,
it
made
homelessness
worse,
it
made
the
affordable
housing
shortage
that
was
at
a
crisis
stage
that
much
worse,
I
represent
people
who
have
moved
because
they
cannot
afford
to
live
here.
They
lived
here
for
20
years.
They
couldn't
maintain.
They
went
through
all
the
stress
and
turmoil
and
had
to
abandon
a
community.
They
love.
P
That
means
lengthy
commutes
disruption
of
the
children.
All
the
things
that
you
would
not
wish
on
anybody
I
hope,
but
continue
to
happen,
and
if
we
don't
have
this
problem
fixed
we're
gonna
be
sitting
here
in
20
years,
no
I
won't
you
won't.
Somebody
will
say
what
were
they
thinking
they
weren't
thinking
hard
enough
and
they
weren't
prioritizing.
No
displacement
means
no
displacement.
Thank
you.
R
Good
evening,
I'm
Ted
Smith
I
live
on
South
15th
Street
I
moved
to
San
Jose
in
1972,
directly
out
of
law
school
and
the
reason
I
moved
here
is
because
I
wanted
to
live
in
a
community
that
I
thought
was
livable.
It
had
good
schools,
it
had
nice
communities
that
had
nice
neighborhoods
I
have
rented
and
owned
homes
in
several
different
sections
of
downtown.
Over
the
last
40-plus
years,
we
were
able
to
buy
a
house
originally
in
1974
for
$24,000
as
our
family
expanded.
R
We
sold
that
house
and
bought
a
bigger
house
for
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
in
1987.
That's
what
it
was
like
in
my
living
memory
and
in
the
living
memory
of
many
of
the
people
in
this
room.
Those
days
are
long
gone
and
during
the
entire
time
that
I
have
lived
here,
I
have
just
seen
this
city
struggle
with
the
issues
of
sustainability
and
by
that
I
mean
affordable,
housing,
really
good
schools,
our
kids
all
went
to
school
here
and
I
think
that
they
got
a
really
good
education
and
I'm.
Really
glad
of
that.
R
R
I
disagree
by
the
way,
with
the
comment
that
was
made
earlier,
that
we
should
treat
this
plan
the
same
way
as
we
treat
everything
else
that
would
be
like
treating
building
a
nuclear
power
plant
and
having
the
same
regulations
as
we
have
for
building
a
campfire
and
having
the
same
regulations
as
we
have
for
a
nuclear
power
plant.
This
is
qualitatively
different
than
anything
we've
had
before
and
I
think
we
need
to
take
that
and
make
that
turn
that
to
our
benefit.
Thank
you.
S
Well,
there
are
a
lot
of
people
here.
Speaking
one
thing
I
noticed,
though,
is
no
one.
Complaining
is
actually
from
my
neighborhood,
which
I
would
argue
is
gonna,
be
most
impacted
by
Google.
So
it's
really
easy.
The
G
for
Google,
you
just
remember
Gardner,
and
that
too,
so
as
the
Gateway
of
Willow
Glen,
Gardner
neighborhood
is
actually
the
perfect
neighborhood
for
Google.
S
When
Google
employees
moved
there
one
day,
they'll
be
able
to
walk
to
downtown
San,
Jose
and
Willow
Glen
we've
got
a
huge
park,
a
community
center,
even
a
pool
you
can
get
to
Trails
for
the
bike
you
can
get
to
highways,
280
and
87,
and
most
of
all
we
have
huge
lots
which
I'm
sure
one
day
might
become
really
big
houses
on
Big
Lots.
The
reality
is
that
one
day
Google
employees
will
be
able
to
walk
five
blocks
from
my
neighborhood
to
get
to
their
office.
S
Our
neighborhood
is
mostly
ignored
by
our
local
leaders,
not
to
call
anyone
out,
and
we
think
that
there's
a
lot
that
could
be
done
before
Google
employees
come
so
that
we
make
it
better.
I've
heard
people
say
that
Google
is
not
breaking
ground
for
five
years
and
therefore
we
don't
need
to
pay
attention
well,
the
reality
is
now
my
neighbors
are
already
being
forced
out.
I
can
introduce
you
to
someone
who
works
two
jobs
who
literally
comes
to
tears.
The
second
you
mentioned
Google.
S
He
said
if
his
rent
goes
up
another
dollar
from
the
thirty
five
hundred
it's
already
out
he's
out.
We
don't
want
to
prevent
Google
from
coming,
but
we
want
to
do
two
things.
We
want
to
minimize
the
damage
for
residents
that
will
be
displaced
from
Gardner,
and
we
also
want
to
make
this
place
better
for
when
Google
employees
come.
So
what
our
request
is
the
city
of
San,
Jose
and
Google
work
together.
S
Don't
just
hold
a
meeting
gardener
talk
to
you
residents,
don't
just
talk
to
the
city
leaders
talk
to
the
people
who
might
not
speak
English
that
are
going
to
be
forced
out
that
are
already
being
forced
out.
The
reality
is
the
Google
and
the
city
of
San
Jose
have
the
ability
to
make
things
a
lot
better
and
unfortunately,
it's
not
happening
today.
Thank
you.
J
Good
evening
group
members,
my
name
is
Huy:
Tran
have
been
in
San
Jose
since
2001.
First
off
I,
don't
know
how
you
guys
can
stay
in
here
for
this
long.
It
is
hot.
You
know,
and
it's
a
bring
that
up
actually
in
relation
to
our
concert
de
Cobo,
some
of
my
time
here
to
talk
about
just
planning.
This
is
my
first
sag
meeting.
This
is
an
incredibly
huge
issue
that
is
need
to
be
addressed
and
encourage
participation
for
residents,
and
this
room
wasn't
it
I
was
in
here
I
had
a
spot.
J
I
walked
out
for
a
brief
moment
to
find
out.
If
there's
gonna
be
an
overage
room,
I
couldn't
get
back
in
I
mean
I,
think
considering
the
size
of
sag
is
already
30
people
and
there
were
75
people
well
outside
there
at
at
one
point.
This
meeting
should
not
be
held
in
here
anymore.
It
should
be
in
the
council,
chambers
or
just
somewhere
that
can
accommodate
a
lot
more
people
now
I
also
serve
on
the
Housing
Commission
for
the
city
of
San
Jose,
but
I
speak
here
today.
J
In
my
individual
capacity-
and
one
thing
we
recently
learned
was
that
in
the
past
year
alone,
10%
of
the
renters
in
San
Jose
received
eviction
notices
10%.
Now
that
number
is
not
going
to
go
down
without
a
solid
detailed
plan
when
Google
creates
its
campus
and
is
going
to
bring
in
20,000
additional
people.
I,
don't
think
people
who
are
opposed
to
Google
what
they
are
opposed
to
Google
without
a
plan
so
now
being
outside
I
got
to
see
the
slides.
J
They
look
nice,
you
know,
I
wasn't
able
to
hear
much
about
it,
but
I
think
the
question
I
want
to
leave
with
you
all
here
as
you're
thinking
about
jobs,
education,
housing,
think
about
accountability,
because
at
the
end
of
the
day
this
is
just
advisory
and
recommendations.
I
would
really
hope
that
all
the
great
ideas
you
put
into
those
slides
actually
to
put
into
action,
and
if
they
don't,
what
can
we
do
to
hold
the
city
and
county
and
accountable?
Thank
you.
Q
1962
I
was
a
little
girl
and
I
grew
up
in
Willow,
Glen
and
I
was
the
only
brown
child
in
that
school.
But
that's:
okay.
Diversity
is
great
immigrants
make
this
country
a
better
country.
The
American
dream
was
buy,
a
home,
raise
a
family.
That
was
the
attitude
we
used
to
have
and
go
to
school
and
get
a
great
education
and
have
a
better
job
for
better
opportunities.
Q
But
the
housing
crisis
has
caused
that
to
kind
of
wonder
where
it
all
went:
investing
greedy
investors,
developers
forgetting
about
homes,
families,
home
sweet
home
and
children
and
elderlies,
and
we're
all
going
there
one
day
when
they
were
going
to
a
care
facility,
and
we
need
to
think
about
who's.
Gonna
take
care
of
us.
We
got
to
think
about
that.
We
haven't
addressed
that
we
need
to
think
about.
Q
Love
makes
the
world
go
round,
god
is
love
and
we
need
to
think
about
one
another
remember
God
is
trusting
in
God
and
God
is
loving
one
another
and
what
happens
to
other
could
happen
to
you
so
think
about
the
families
that
are
out
there.
We
don't
need
that.
We
need
solutions
and
that
solution
is.
You
can
make
a
difference
today.
Remember
what
the
other
one
said:
what
are
the
grandchildren
going
to
say
about
us?
What
were
we
thinking
when
Google
came
here?
Q
B
H
Well,
my
name
is
Karen
Jillette
I
am
retired
now
and
I'm
a
homeless
advocate.
My
church
is
Trinity
Cathedral
in
downtown
San
Jose
very
difficult
to
get
in
to
see
my
councilmember
downtown
I'm,
not
a
part
of
Facebook,
or
anything
like
that.
So
it's
hard
for
me
to
you
know,
connect
to
the
group
saw
before
I
go
I'm
gonna
leave
Paul
my
contact
information
because
I'd
really
like
to
get
more
involved
in
this
did
I
say
not
only
do
I
live
downtown.
My
church
is
right
off
of
st.
James
Park.
H
It's
Trinity
Cathedral
was
built
in
1863.
So
if
we
want
to
talk
about
history,
I've
worked
with
the
archives
at
our
church
and
try
to
help
people
in
st.
James,
Park,
I'm,
also
part
of
winter
faith
collaborative
we
do
what
we
can
as
volunteers
for
homeless
people
here,
I
think
tonight,
I've
been
concerned
to
hear
that
it
seems
like
we're
asking
this.
The
Google,
rather
than
the
city
to
solve
all
of
our
problems
are
many
of
our
problems.
Downtown
and
I.
H
Don't
think
that
that's
that's
fair
I
do
a
lot
of
traveling
I
enjoy
traveling
and
if
I
go
to
a
city
like
London,
England
I
don't
have
a
problem.
Finding
a
restroom
for
some
reason
in
downtown
San
Jose,
it's
very
difficult
to
find
a
restroom
that
that
you
can
have
access
to.
Could
we
please
I,
don't
I
think
it
should
be
the
city
that
should
look
into,
and
maybe
you
can
take
this
back
to
Raoul.
You
know,
I,
don't
know
why
it's
so
difficult
for
us
to
figure
out
this
issue.
H
Okay,
with
restrooms
and
and
I,
think
that
we
we
should
not
forget
our
low-income
and
homeless
housing
when
we're
thinking
about
planning
but
again
I,
don't
think
it's
fair
to
leave
or
ask
Google
to
solve
all
of
our
problems.
We're
taxpayers
many
of
us
and
I
think
that
the
city
should
be
stepping
up
to
solve
some
of
our
problems.
Thank
you.
C
Good
evening
my
name
is
Rebecca
Yola
and
I
work
as
a
barista
at
a
tech
company
here
in
San,
Jose
and
I
reside
in
Eastside
San
Jose.
So
this
is
the
city.
I
was
born
and
raised
in
I
left
college
for
a
while,
but
I
returned
back
to
lose
my
family
in
order
to
make
paying
my
student
debt
more
affordable,
San
Jose
is
the
only
hometown,
I
have
known
and
can't
imagine
making
a
future
for
myself
in
any
other
city.
C
C
I
am
from
Eastside,
San,
Jose
and
being
displaced
could
be
a
reality
for
me,
and
the
people
living
in
my
community
I
want
answers
from
Google
about
what
they
are
envisioning
for
housing,
I
hope
this
community
and
the
city
of
San
Jose
will
uphold
strong
housing
standards
for
the
project
and
ensure
Google
make
firm,
detailed
commitments,
I'm
counting
on
you
to
protect
the
future
of
our
community.
Thank
you.
E
Hi,
my
name
is
Phil
Johnson
I
live
on
North
4th
Street
I,
recently
moved
back
to
San
Jose
from
the
East
Coast
I
lived
in
San
Jose
for
30
years.
It's
where
we
raised
our
kids
on
South
16th
Street,
my
wife
and
I
moved
there
in
the
late
60s,
when
the
department
stores
were
moving
out
to
Valley
Fair
and
a
lot
of
absentee
landlords
were
renting
to
homeless
people
in
collecting,
not
homeless,
people,
sorry
mentally
ill
people
and
collecting
their
estate
checks.
E
So
there
were
problems
at
that
time,
but
what
I
liked
about
San
Jose
and
our
neighborhood
in
particularly
in
Negley
Park,
was
there
was
a
lot
of
economic
diversity,
ethnic
diversity,
professional
people
living
alongside
working-class
people.
People
could
afford
the
housing
at
that
time
whether
they
were
renting
or
buying.
There
were
a
lot
of
young
couples
coming
in
and
rehabbing
houses,
and
it
was
a
wonderful
environment
for
the
kids
to
grow
up
in
regardless
of
the
fact
that
there
were
a
few
crazy
people
wandering
around
in
the
streets.
E
Nothing
like
what
I
see
now
outside
my
apartment,
building
on
North.
Fourth
Street.
What
I'm
worried
about
is
I.
Don't
want
this
to
become
a
company
town.
The
United
States
has
a
long
history
of
having
large
corporations,
basically
sort
of
purchased
towns
and
then
everybody's
dependent
on
them.
It
killed
small
business.
E
It
totally
changes
the
community
profile
instead
of
a
variety
of
people,
diverse
population,
number
of
different
ethnicities
and
people
of
different
economic
backgrounds
and
working
at
different
types
of
jobs.
It
moves
everybody.
It
excludes
everybody
who
doesn't
have
a
lot
of
money,
wealth
and
power.
Basically,
and
that's
what
gentrification
is
it's:
it's
occurred
throughout
cities
in
the
United
States,
currently
in
Seattle,
I,
don't
want
to
see
people
be
excluded
and
displaced,
and
only
the
very
wealthy
and
affluent
be
able
to
live
in
downtown
San
Jose.
E
E
We
advocate
for
the
unhoused
folks
in
Santa
Clara
Valley,
which
is
a
growing
population.
As
you
probably
know
in
the
county,
we
count
7400.
It's
really
just
me
and
some
of
the
advocates
and
agencies
who
have
counted
people
it's
closer
to
about
25,000
I,
have
a
personal
connection
in
this
area,
because
I
was
born
on
Sonoma
and
San.
Fernando
went
to
school
at
st.
joseph´s
elementary
school.
My
first
job
was
at
Del
Monte
plan
51.
E
My
parents
had
a
a
business
on
the
alameda
for
35
years,
so
it
has
impacted
me,
but
I'm
privileged,
and
what
I
hope
to
see
ear
regardless
of
Google
is
that
we
as
a
community,
address
the
issues
that
we
need
to
address
when
I
retired
I
said
I'm
gonna
give
back
and
make
this
a
better
community.
Little
did
I
know
I'd,
be
dealing
with
such
a
vexing
problem,
but
though
we'd
be
building
wonderful
things
and
and
and
doing
great
things
and
an
engaging
community
not
solving
these
problems.
E
But
if
we
were
able
to
address
the
issues
of
Costa
Hawkins
of
the
legal
defense
for
evictions
for
funding
subsidies,
if
we're
able
to
do
things
like
the
green
print
process
has
and
get
those
things
done
in
this
city,
because
Google
is
here
now
and
waiting
for
us
to
to
welcome
them.
Then
God
bless
this
process,
but
I
don't
hear
a
process
yet
that
we
have
come
together
on
we're
weird
together
and
we
have
coalesced
and
we
had
consents
on
anything
and
I've
hope
and
tonight
it
will
pray
that
we
have
that
after
tomorrow.
P
The
first
site,
I
had
declare
was
full
of
homeless
encampment,
and
so
it
really
brought
to
light
the
fact
that
we
have
a
problem
and
I've
dealt
with
homeless
in
New
York
City.
Someone
who
started
a
program
called
New,
York,
City
relief
and
so
I
had
some
first-hand
experience.
I
look
at
this
opportunity
as
one
to
take
models
for
other
cities
and
apply
it
to
our
city
and
and
also
I,
look
at
the
cost
of
construction
and
wanting
to
build
affordable
housing
without
subsidies.
We
can't
build
affordable
housing,
it's
impossible.
P
D
Good
evening
my
name
is
David
Lopez
former
president
of
the
National
Hispanic
University
here
in
San
Jose,
former
professor
of
Education,
and
a
teacher
and
I
come
before
you
just
share
a
few
words
on
your
education
agenda.
I
had
the
opportunity
read
the
minutes,
I
couldn't
be
here
for
the
presentation
earlier,
but
I
can
tell
you
if
someone
said
before
me,
this
opportunity
is
qualitatively
different.
D
I
have
dedicated
my
educational
career
to
looking
for
bold
and
innovative
ways
to
address
the
challenges
of
educating
the
underprivileged,
the
undereducated
and
the
under
resource,
especially
people
of
color
and
I
can
tell
you.
You
have
some
nice
ideas
that
you're
suggesting
there
are
some
great
institutions
that
you've
identified.
I've
worked
with
them,
but
I
can
tell
you.
Google
presents
a
tremendous
opportunity
where
they
can
marshal
their
immense
technological
and
human
resources
to
this
area.
D
If
we
work
bold
and
in
an
innovative
way
and
in
to
get
and
together,
we
can
make
sure
that
those
children
out
there
receive
the
education
and
have
the
teachers
and
importantly,
the
ecosystem,
that
Google
can
help
us
with
their
technological
advances,
to
create
that
prototype
that
will
help
them
become
the
educated
workforce,
but
I
will
underscore
bold
and
innovative.
Let's
not
look
at
what
we've
had
in
the
past.
What
we
currently
have
and
think
it's
going
to
give
us
different
results
that
will
not
work
so
I
hope,
you're
thinking,
bold,
innovative,
resourceful.
B
G
Hello,
my
name
is
actually
Danielle
Gonzales
seriously,
though,
can
we
turn
on
the
AC
like
y'all?
Are
making
me
think
you
don't
want
the
community
to
like
be
here.
It's
getting
really
uncomfortable
I
want
to
ask
a
question:
who
remembers
the
vote
to
bring
Google
here
on
whether
we
should
even
have
this
conversation?
G
Anyone
that's
right,
it
didn't
happen.
The
conversation
on
what
to
do
with
public
lands
should
begin
and
end
with
solutions
of
the
people.
We
didn't
ID
him.
We
did
not
invite
Google
here.
This
is
pointless.
If
you
want
to
know
what
all
this
leads
to
drive
to,
Mountain
View
go
to
ranks,
North
Park,
there's
a
line
of
RVs.
As
far
as
the
eye
can
see,
you'll
find
a
little
boy.
There
he's
two
years
old
he's
autistic.
He
spends
his
day
swinging
in
a
net
by
his
RV.
G
Look
at
Seattle.
The
city
tries
to
pass
taxes,
Amazon
submarines
m4,
my
friend,
who
asked
about
why
he's
downtown
hasn't
taken
off
I'll
tell
you:
why
is
it
because
it
hasn't
been
given
to
the
people?
If
you
want
to
preserve
culture
and
history,
the
creators
of
that
culture
and
history
must
lead
anyone.
Is
anyone
here
willing
to
give
a
presentation
about
culture
and
history
in
San?
Jose?
G
Also
stop
stop
with
the
discussion
about
coding
programs
for
poor
kids.
Like
I
know,
everyone
knows
that
is
just
a
tech
driven
initiative
to
suppress
wages,
who
all
appointed
you
this.
This
whole
conversation
is
perverse
because
you
cannot
pretend
to
represent
the
communities
if
I
walk
outside
I
can
find
you
thousands
of
people
who
have
no
idea
what's
about
to
hit
them
and
it's
not
jobs.
It's
gentrification,
it's
displacement,
its
pain.
G
If
any
of
you
are
really
from
here
and
care,
what
happens?
You
will
not
continue
this
lie.
You
will
abdicate
your
place
in
this
committee.
Those
of
you
on
this
committee
deceiving
your
constituencies
doing
damage
by
continuously
saying
that
there
is
light
at
any
there's
any
light
at
the
end
of
this
tunnel.
Stop
doing
for
any
polls
saying
that
it's
about
jobs
and
then
tell
and
then
using
those
people
to
say
that
San
Jose
welcomes
Google,
because
it's
not
true.
B
T
Good
evening
folks,
my
name
is
Ayana:
I
am
a
student
of
Santa
Clara
County
I
am
also
on
houst
because
of
the
property
costs
that
are
going
up
and
I'm
very
concerned
because
I
love
technology,
I,
think
technology
is
great
and
it
can
be
used
to
help
the
people.
But
that
is
not
what's
happening
here.
Google
has
has
dominated
technology
markets
and
they're.
What
they're
about
to
do
by
coming
into
San
Jose
is
another
example
of
corporate
capture
of
the
Commons,
and
there
is
no
solid
plan
on
how
is
this
going
to
help
the
people?
T
First
of
all,
the
people
don't
even
want
this,
as
Danielle
has
mentioned
before.
Where
was
the
vote
that
even
like
determined
that
they
should
even
like?
There
should
even
be
a
prospect
that
they're
coming
in
that
did
not
happen
and
San
Jose
is
a
city
with
a
lot
of
culture
and
a
lot
of
history,
and
the
only
thing
that's
coming
out
of
this
there's
a
lot
of
displacement,
and
it's
going
to
happen
because
it
has
already
happened
in
a
lot
of
places
in
the
world,
including
the
u.s.
here
in
the
Bay
Area
San.
T
Jose
is
one
of
the
most
expensive
places
to
live
in.
It
is
the
third
most
expensive
city
in
the
world
in
terms
of
rent
costs.
I
think
that's
outrageous.
It
has
not
been
like
that
and
we
don't
want
to
build
a
Google
ville
kind
of
like
Hoovervilles
of
the
20th
century,
so
where's
this
discussion
on
all
of
that,
it's
not
happening
we're
just
washing
that
away,
pushing
it
under
the
table
and
instead
discussing
jobs,
it's
not
about
jobs,
it's
about
the
people
and
there's
a
lot
more
than
jobs.
T
Q
Q
It's
appalling.
It's
appalling
to
hear
this
is
the
community
engagement
process?
Y'all,
don't
represent
the
community,
you
don't
look
like
the
community.
You
have
no
idea,
you
don't
even
care
what
the
community
wants.
I
know,
I'm
generalizing,
but
most
of
you
here
have
a
financial
interest
in
this
deal
going
through.
Q
Q
It
was
presented
by
somebody
who
doesn't
even
speak
Spanish
how
embarrassing,
how
embarrassing
and
the
city
staff
totally
defending
Google
like
they
already
worked
for
them
because
yep
they
do
our
City
Council
our
mayor,
our
city
manager,
y'all,
are
already
working
for
Google.
They
were
twisting
people's
words
asking
repeatedly.
How
can
you
say
that
in
a
positive
way,
what
kind
of
process
is
this?
They
were
not
listening
to
the
community.
So
when
you
give
you
a
report
back,
is
that
gonna
be
in
there?
I
do
want
to
say
from
those
people
said.
Q
N
Thank
you
and
good
evening,
so
I'm
like
to
focus
on
a
couple
for
in
starting
well,
echoing
some
of
the
comments
our
former
vice
mayor
made
earlier,
is
that
we
essentially
here
trying
to
attempt
to
we're
focusing
on
potentially
mitigating
potential
impacts,
but
we're
not
looking
at
the
positives
and
a
gentleman
earlier
mentioned.
Potentially
you
know,
educating
the
younger
generations
and
another
comment
I
advice
may
made
is
that:
why
are
we
focusing
on
Google?
Why
aren't
we
focusing
on
all
the
other
companies
that
are
moving
in
here
and
I'll?
N
N
Another
thing
I'll
give
you
an
example
of
other
things
which
are
impacting
people.
It's.
Let's
look
at
a
bar
project
and
Bill
mentioned
these
issues
of
an
integration
with
Dehradun
does
that
anybody
in
this
room
know
that
bath
is
potentially
about
to
displace
46
families,
and
if
you
don't
I
suggest
you
attend
Bob
Boone
meeting
on
on
the
fifth
and
on
the
11th.
The
VTA
will
actually
be
here
in
this
room.
N
P
I
just
wanted
to
come
up,
it's
been
really
frustrating
frustrating
as
a
housing
advocate
and
an
advocate
for
the
unhoused
people
that
you
frequently
have
to.
The
only
way
that
we've
been
able
to
effect
change
is
when
somebody
dies
or
when
somebody
is
dying.
The
only
way
that
we
manage
to
get
duplexes
covered
under
the
tpo
was
when
richard
cavanagh
died
after
being
evicted
from
his
duplex
of
50
years.
P
We
routinely
had
people
here
who
were
brown,
who
walked
out
to
the
bathroom
and
people
they
weren't
let
back
in.
We
saw
this.
We
saw
a
white
guy
walk
from
the
outside,
walk
straight
to
the
door
and
get
laughs
back
in
I,
don't
understand
what
the
problem
is
and
I
don't
understand
what
your
problem
is
with
free
speech.
You
should
have
met
in
the
chambers
where
all
of
us
could
be
together,
but
I'm
glad
you
chose
the
sauna
cause.
It
looks
like
y'all
enjoyed
that.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
so
we
were
gonna
spend
a
little
bit
of
time
at
the
end
of
the
meeting.
Talking
about
your
report
but
I
think
during
public
comment.
Almost
all
of
you
came
up
to
me
and
and
mention
the
heat
issue,
so
I
do
apologize
for
that.
That's
not
a
tactic
of
any
stretch.
You've
probably
seen
three
or
four
employees
run
back
and
forth
in
the
hallway
several
times
to
try
and
fix
the
situation,
but
it
doesn't
appear
to
be
working.
A
So
my
question
to
the
group
is:
we
can
spend
another
15
or
20
minutes
together
talking
about
the
draft
comprehensive
report
or
you
all
have
it
in
your
packet.
You
can
look
at
it
and
we
could
spend
10
or
15
minutes
at
the
beginning
of
next
meeting.
Our
intent
today
was
simply
to
just
introduce
it
as
that
not
walk
through
in
great
detail,
but
to
allow
you
guys
to
absorb
it
a
little
bit
because
it
is
your
report
and
then
have
a
discussion
about
it.
A
So
I'm
fine,
given
kind
of
the
situation
of
the
room
having
lost
five
pounds
myself
tonight,
if
you
guys,
would
choose
to
want
to
come
back
and
have
that
discussion
in
three
weeks
as
opposed
to
doing
it
now,
because
I
know
several
of
you
and
several
of
the
members
of
the
public
and
staff
are
very
uncomfortable
in
this
room
right
now.
So
unless
someone
says
otherwise
I
think
we
will
ask
each
of
you
to
take
a
look
at
it
and
then
come
back
Theresa.
K
H
A
So,
as
we've
we've
thought
about
it
and
again
we'll
be
quick,
so
we
get
you
guys
out
of
here
as
we've
thought
about
the
report.
Obviously
no
report
is
good
without
an
executive,
summary
and
introduction.
We
do
want
to
spend
quite
a
bit
of
time
in
this
report
as
staff
kind
of
on
the
background
in
context.
If
someone
were
to
read
this
report
and
start
reading,
these
solutions,
I
think
it
would
be
confusing
to
the
reader.
So
we
do
want
to
give
the
kind
of
background
of
the
context.
A
What's
happened
with
some
of
these
issues
and
how
we
got
here
today
and
then
highlight
the
community
engagement
process,
the
meetings
that
have
happened
here,
the
pop
ups,
the
community
forums
that
have
happened
in
the
neighborhoods,
as
well
as
some
of
the
online
forums
and
many
of
you
have
conducted
your
own
community
outreach
that
we
would
probably
roll
into
that
and
then
begin
to
kind
of
flush
out.
The
key
themes
and
I
think
a
lot
of
those
key
themes
are
based
off
of
our
solution
groups
and
then
start
identifying
the
potential
solution.
A
So,
within
that
potential
solutions
in
group
or
in
number
six,
we
would
keep
our
kind
of
the
subcommittee's
or
the
solution
group
areas
and
talk
about
how
you
prioritize
those
and
why
and
where
they
belong.
Whether
is
in
this
report,
if
the
city
is
going
to
be
doing
something,
I
know
some
of
the
group's
wanted
to
make
sure,
even
if
it
was
like
a
high-speed
rail
issue
that
it
still
be
identified
in
the
report,
and
then
we
speak
about
it.
So
we'll
do
that
and
then
start
to
highlight
conclusion
and
next
steps.
A
So
that's
kind
of
a
general
framework
that
we
would
like
to
follow.
But
again
that's
us
kind
of
throwing
it
out
to
you.
We
would
want
you
guys
to
think
about
it
a
little
bit
more
over
the
next
few
weeks
and
please
contact
Lori
or
I
in
the
meantime,
if
you
have
any
ideas
on
you
know
rearranging
it
tweaks
or
anything
else,
and
we
will
work
on
the
air
conditioning
in
the
meantime.
J
A
A
So
we
will
be
back
together
on
August
29th
and
then
we
have
scheduled
two
other
meetings
for
September
27th
and
over
18.
That
was
all
you
know,
we'll
get
the
locations
out.
I
think
some
of
them
will
happen
in
here.
If
we're
gonna
think
about
a
larger
meeting
like
tonight,
we
will
see
about
the
possibility
and
the
logistics
of
having
in
chambers
or
somewhere
else
to
accommodate
that,
if
need
be.
But
with
that
I'm
sorry
bill.
I
A
I
feel
pretty
confident
thing
is
not
gonna
be
500
pages.
I
do
think
you
know
one
of
the
things
that
Laurie
and
I
have
talked
about
is
obviously
you
can
see
tonight
with
some
of
the
wording
on
the
potential
solutions
us
getting,
maybe
like
an
and
or
an
or
wrong.
So
what
I
think
we
would
like
to
do?
Is
we
start
to
build
out
the
sections?
C
A
Okay,
I
would
say:
I'm
not
100%
sure
how
to
respond
to
that
right.
Now.
I
think
that
goes
back
to
some
of
the
stuff
that
you
guys
agreed
to
as
a
group
on
how
you're
gonna
work
together.
Okay,
so
we
do
want
to
spend
some
time
on
that.
The
next
meeting
I'm
happy
to
do
that,
but
I
think
that's
a
conversation
amongst
you
all
Kathy.
J
It's
been
a
challenge,
just
it
would
help
me
if
there
was
clarity
on
is
the
report
recommendations
for
the
station
area
globally
and
how
specific
is
gonna,
be
the
Google
project,
cuz
I,
think
all
of
the
meetings
go
back
and
forth
between.
Are
they
recommendations
for
the
potential
sale
agreement
for
Google
in
December?
Are
they
specific
to
the
stationary
development
I
think
it
can
be
a
challenge
to
write
the
report
addressing
both
things
or
is
the
report
can
have
a
singular
focus
on
one
of
those
two.
A
Yeah,
so
I
I
think
it
would
be
difficult
to
have
the
report
just
focus
on
one
of
those
things
given
kind
of
the
diverse
perspectives
around
the
table
and
kind
of
everyone.
That's
had
ideas.
Is
that
really
good
ideas
and
really
rich
and
they've
either
kind
of
been
on
something
that
should
be
in
a
Google,
MOU
or
like
I've,
said
high-speed
rail
or
you
know
the
disk
process,
so
I
think
as
staff.
A
Quite
frankly,
you
know
I
/,
intergovernmental
relations,
team
at
the
city,
there's
a
report
or
there's
a
recommendation
or
that
I
need
to
follow
separate
from
any
of
this
related
acosta
Hakan,
so
I
think
there's
several
things
in
there
and
we'll
need
to
find
a
way
to
kind
of
identify
who
starts
working
on
that
and
where
it
belongs.
But
I
don't
want
to
keep
any
of
those
solutions
out
because
they
don't
fit
in
a
certain
box.
N
K
A
H
A
Yes,
it
is
a
bad
thing.
Okay,
thank
you
for
sweating
it
out
with
us.
We
will
be
back
on
August
29th.
Thank
you.
Everyone.