►
From YouTube: JUN 6, 2022 | Transportation & Environment Committee
Description
City of San José, California
Transportation & Environment Committee of June 6, 2022.
Pre-meeting citizen input on Agenda via eComment at https://sanjose.granicusideas.com/meetings.
This public meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar. For information on public participation via Zoom, please refer to the linked meeting agenda below.
Agenda https://sanjose.granicus.com/AgendaViewer.php?view_id=51&event_id=4677
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
All
members
of
the
committee
staff
and
the
public
are
expected
to
refrain
from
abusive
language
failure
to
comply
with
the
code
of
conduct
which
will
disturb,
disrupt
or
impede
the
orderly
conduct
of
this
meeting
will
result
in
removal
from
the
meeting,
and
now
with
that,
I
will
call
the
meeting
of
the
transportation
and
environment
committee
to
order.
Can
the
clerk
please
call
the
rule
foley.
D
C
B
B
So
we
have
quorum
and
council
member
cohen.
If
you
are
here,
I
can
see
you
on
the
screen,
but
we
can't
hear
you
just
so.
You
know
all
right
with
that.
We
will
go
to
item
b,
which
is
review
of
the
work
plan.
There
is
one
item
that
is
recommended
to
be
dropped
and
the
only
reason
it's
recommended
to
be
dropped
is
that
it
will
come
forward
in
the
next
fiscal
year
so
rather
than
being
heard
today.
B
A
C
B
All
right,
we
will
move
on
to
item
d1.
This
is
first
report
to
the
committee,
which
is
center
city
generated
tow
services,
delivery
model
status
report.
Rachel.
Do
you
want
to
get
us
started
or
chris
did
you
want
to
kick
it
off?.
H
Thank
you.
Let
me
go
ahead
and
share
the
screen.
H
Okay,
so
we
are
presenting
today,
our
city
generated
tow
services,
delivery
model
status
report,
I'm
rachel
roberts,
I'm
the
deputy
director
of
code
enforcement
and
I'm
here,
along
with
captain
carlos
acosta
and
sergeant
kevin
seabree,
as,
as
you
know,
chris
burton
our
director
from
pbce
is
also
here
and
then
also
our
deputy
director,
andrea
flores,
shelton
from
parks,
recreation
and
neighborhood
services.
H
Okay,
so
our
city
generated
toe
services
status
report
will
provide
a
background
of
the
city
generated
tow
services
as
well,
as
recap,
of
our
key
to
audit
recommendations
and
work
plan
goals
and
we'll
also
cover
the
progress
and
outcomes
we've
had
to
date
and
then
we'll
be
taking
a
look
at
our
current
status
and
service
delivery,
environment
and
then,
lastly,
our
work
plan
objectives
and
our
target
dates
for
the
upcoming
fiscal
year.
H
We
have
agreements
with
six
toe
companies
that
provide
these
tow
services
across
our
city
in
their
assigned
respective
zones
and
on
average
we
conduct
approximately
14
000
of
these
city-generated
tows
annually
in
january
of
2019
city
council
did
accept
the
city
auditor's
audit
of
towing
services,
which
evaluated
the
city
generated
tow
service
delivery
model
and
also
provided
17
recommendations
for
improvement.
H
So,
just
to
provide
a
refresher
I've
listed
here,
some
of
those
key
audit
recommendations,
as
well
as
our
our
key
work
plan
items
so
for
our
tow
audit.
Those
recommendations
included
issuance
of
a
new
request
for
a
report
request
for
proposal.
H
Excuse
me
for
the
tow
services
agreements,
as
well
as
exploring
the
continuance
of
junk
vehicle
reimbursement
program
or
potentially
new
contract
fees,
to
account
for
the
cost
of
junk
vehicle
disposal
and
then
also
provided
a
recommendation
that
we
consolidate
the
contract
administration
and
the
police
department
with
evaluation
of
the
resources
needed
in
order
to
perform
that
responsibility.
H
So
our
work
plan
progress
to
date,
we've
done
quite
a
bit
of
work,
as
the
committee
I'm
sure
knows,
since,
since
the
initial
audit
report
I've
listed
out
here
according
to
fiscal
year,
however,
we
have
completed
a
total
of
four
amendments,
the
second
third,
fourth
and
fifth,
amendments
to
the
agreements.
H
H
H
As
I
mentioned
previously,
we've
maintained
the
continuity
of
operations
through
the
coven
19
pandemic
and
we're
able
to
provide
financial
relief
to
the
operators
to
offset
the
increasing
number
of
junk
vehicles
that
were
being
towed
over
the
last
few
years,
including
those
disposal
costs
and
also
to
offset
the
declining
release
rates
that
we
are
seeing
and
then
we
implemented
and
partly
implemented.
Several
of
the
upper
toe
audit
excuse
me
total
audit
recommendations
that
were
put
forth.
H
H
H
We've
also
seen
an
increase
in
related
junk
toes
and
disposal
costs
with
beautify
having
towed
92
vehicles
in
this
fiscal
year
alone,
and
we
are
now
estimating
potentially
up
to
250
vehicle
toes
as
part
of
the
beautify
sj
abatement
work
for
fiscal
year
2223.
H
So,
given
these
impacts,
staff
did
pause
the
release
of
the
tow
software
and
contract
administration
rfp
in
march
of
2022,
so
that
we
could
evaluate
these
impacts
and
currently,
as
well
as
into
the
future
on
the
city
generated
tow
services.
The
agreements,
as
well
as
the
scope
of
the
rfp,
and
we
are
now
currently
in
the
process
of
updating
the
rfp
scope
in
order
to
reflect
these
current
and
future
beautify
sj
to
service
needs
prior
to
release
to
ensure
continuity
of
tow
services.
H
As
we
work
through
this
stage,
we
had
extended
the
contracts,
as
I
mentioned
previously,
we're
also
evaluating
the
need
to
reinstate
the
junk
vehicle
tow
disposal,
cost
reimbursement
model
which
was
sunsetted
in
2021
and
then
also
looking
at
reins
as
part
of
that
reinstatement
having
to
draft
a
sixth
amendment
to
the
agreements
in
order
to
reflect
the
beautify,
sj,
tow
service
needs
and
reimbursement
model,
and
we
are
continuing
to
coordinate
with
our
operators
in
the
all
the
involved
departments.
H
So
as
far
as
our
work
plan
for
2223,
taking
into
account
all
the
items
I've
just
mentioned,
we
are
looking
to
continue
to
complete
the
scope
to
the
rfp
and
hopes
to
resubmit
that
to
the
finance
department
procurement
group
in
july
of
2022.
H
We
will
continue
to
develop
the
sixth
amendment
and
bring
that
forward
for
council's
consideration
in
august
of
this
year.
Unfortunately,
at
this
time,
the
release
of
the
rfp,
as
well
as
a
ward
of
contract,
is
to
be
determined
pending
that
resubmission
to
the
procurement
board.
A
Yes
can
you
hear
me
this
is
jerry
stranzo.
We
can
hear
you
jerry
good.
Thank
you.
Well,
first
of
all,
thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee
in
hearing
this
item.
A
special
thanks
goes
out
to
rachel
and
her
team.
That's
been
working
very
diligently
to
improve
the
system.
I
actually
represent
three
of
the
six
tow
operators-
motorbody
olaji
brothers
and
cityco,
so
really
rare
in
absolute
support
of
councilmember
davis's
memo
we're
anxious
to
respond
to
the
rfp
to
improve
the
efficiency
of
the
co-contract.
A
The
software
technology,
third-party
administration
that
would
be
implemented
is
something
we
think
will
make
sense.
Staff
has
suggested
that
now
for
over
a
year,
and
we've
been
waiting
patiently
for
the
last
six
months
for
the
release
of
the
rfp,
so
we're
hoping,
as
indicated
by
staff,
that
the
rfp
will
be
out
by
hopefully
august
and
we
look
forward
to
responding
to
try
to
improve
the
system.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
support,
encourage
the
rest
of
the
council
members
to
support
council
member
davis's
memo.
Thank
you.
A
Thanks
I
wanted
to.
A
I
have
been
hearing
a
lot
of
conflicting
things.
So,
as
we
ask
about
toes
and
the
weights
for
toes
one
of
the
things
we're
hearing
is
in
my
office
is
there's
a
long
wait
and
then
you
know
we
go
to
ask
someone
else
and
it's
like
no.
The
tow
operators
are
complying
with
their
with
the
contracts
and
there's
no
way
in
the
community.
There's
there's
a
weight,
and
so
I
wanted
to
hear
more
of
sort
of
the
conflicts
with
beautify
sj.
A
H
So,
generally
speaking,
they
are
meeting
the
service
delivery
expectations
there
were.
There
was
a
point
in
time
where
we
were
having
some
challenges
with
the
particular
zone,
but
those
seem
to
be
improving,
so
we're
hoping
to
see
to
see
that
continue.
H
We
re-implemented
our
internal
working
group
that
includes
prns
dot
code
enforcement
as
the
tow
contract
administrator,
as
well
as
the
police
department
to
talk
through
any
challenges
or
issues
as
they
arise,
and
that's
happening
on
at
least
a
monthly
basis,
if
not
more
frequently
as
needed,
and
so
one
of
the
things
we
already
identified
was
just
an
improvement
in
our
communication
so
that
those
events
aren't
overlapping,
because
what
we're
finding
is
that
you
know
if
we
weren't
on
the
same
page
as
far
as
our
timelines,
that
the
the
operators
were
getting
hit
with
requests
that
may
they
may
not
be
equipped
to
handle
all
at
once
competing
requests,
whether
it
was
like
a
you
know,
a
public
works,
related
construction,
towing
event
going
on
or
a
suite
or
excuse
me,
a
removal
of
vehicles
in
particular,
neighborhoods
or
or
related
to
beautifies
j,
so
we're
we're
making
improvements
in
that
regard.
H
So
we
do
hope
that
we'll
you
will
see
those
improved
effects
throughout,
because
that
is
a
key
piece
of
of
what
we're
making
sure
we
focus
on
is
that
it
doesn't
impact
the
day-to-day
city
generated
toe
service
deliveries.
H
A
Thank
you
I,
and
I'm
also
I'm
just
gonna
state
that
I'm
hoping
that
you
know
later
this
month
when
we
vote
on
the
budget,
and
we
set
some
funds
aside
to
really
have
barriers
for
cars
driving
in
our
waterways
and
other
places
in
the
first
place,
hopefully
that
that
will
help
on
the
beautify
sj
side
of
it,
because
I
I
have
seen
those
impact
and
I'm
hoping
the
coordination,
help,
helps
and
and
and
I'll
actually
stop
right
there.
So
I'll
stop
right
there.
Thank
you
rachel
great
report.
Thanks.
B
B
Okay,
I
do
have
some
questions
as
well.
If
no
other
members
of
the
committee
have
questions,
I
see
no
other
hands
rachel.
I
appreciate
the
report.
I
have
some
questions.
I
didn't
see
it
in
the
memo
you
mentioned
in
your
presentation,
the
implementation
or
partial
implementation
of
several
of
the
toe
audit
recommendations.
B
However,
they
weren't
listed
out
in
the
in
the
memo.
Unless
I
missed
it,
please
let
me
know
where
they
are,
which
ones
have
been
implemented
or
and
which
ones
have
been
partially
implemented
and
which
ones
are
still
outstanding.
Is
that
something
that
we
can
get?
Obviously,
maybe
not
now,
unless
it's
already
in
the
memo-
and
I
just
missed
it?
B
H
B
Yeah,
that
would
be
great.
I
thought
that
was
that
from
I'm,
I
may
have
missed
it.
Was
it
in
a
footnote
or
something
yes,
okay,
thanks
and
then.
The
other
question
I
have
is:
how
much
does
the
rfp
have
to
change
based
on
the
beautify
sj
requirements,
because
we're
talking
about
software
is
the
software
requirements
really
going
to
be
different.
H
So
so
the
rfp
includes
the
software
component,
but
it
also
includes
the
tow
contract
administration,
as
well
as
the
option
to
subcontract
directly
with
the
operators.
So
if
we
have
a
proposer
who
is
willing
to
take
on
that
role
of
contracting
directly
with
the
operators
which
would
take
the
city
out
of
that
role,
then
it
is
a
factor
because
we
have
to
provide
our
performance
standards
and
expectations
of
service
delivery
as
part
of
the
request
for
a
proposal.
B
B
This
has
been
something
that
I've
been
hearing
from.
The
tow
companies
has
been
a
pain
point
for
quite
some
time,
and
the
fact
that
it
continues
to
be
delayed
is
very
concerning,
especially
given
what
council,
member
esparza
has
been
saying
about
delayed
toes
and
what
she's
been
hearing
out
in
the
community.
H
So
that
we
were
following
previous
direction
that
we
had
received
from
both
council
and
the
committee
as
far
as
the
scope
of
the
rfp,
I
think
to
bifurcate
it
at
this
point,
we
would
have
to
circle
back
with
the
procurement
team
to
understand.
You
know
the
implications
of
making
that
that
change.
I
I
would
still
suggest
that
we
move
forward
with
it
as
proposed,
but
you
know,
of
course
I
think
you
guys
have
a
a
say
in
that.
B
All
right,
I
I
have
to
say
I
I
just
I'm-
really
concerned
that
this
is
continuing
to
it.
I
understand
the
delays
from
the
pandemic,
but
the
fact
that
this
continues
to
drag
on
and
we
continue
to
sort
of
add
to
it
over
time
is
it
it
feels
like
we're,
never
going
to
get
across
the
finish
line,
and
that
was
part
of
the
reason
just
for
the
for
the
other
members
of
the
committee.
That
was
part
of
the
reason
for
my
memo
is
that
we
need
to
give
staff
clear
direction
that
we
really
want.
B
This
really
want
this
set
of
tasks
to
be
expedited
and
completed,
because
it
is
a
pain
point.
The
towing
or
lack
thereof
in
in
our
community
is
a
pain
point
for
many
residents
and
for
us
to
be
able
to
get
back
to
a
level
of
service
that
I
think
we
all
expect
and
that
I
know
our
residents
expect
in
the
in
the
area
of
towing
vehicles
that
are
on
our
city
streets
and
in
our
public
property.
I
think
we
need
to.
B
I
think
we
need
to
make
it
clear
to
staff
that
we
want
to
expedite
this
body
of
work,
so
I
would
very
much
appreciate
the
motion
that
accepts
this
report
also
moves
my
memo
forward.
I
Yeah,
I
I
I
I
wanted
to
just
I'm
I'm
comfortable
so
long
as
I
understand
from
staff.
What's
that
going
to
to
do
is
that
gonna?
Is
that
gonna
delay
things
maybe
even
further
or
where
are
we
gonna,
be
on
sort
of
a
similar
timeline?
So
I'm
just
kind
of
curious
on
what
that
what
that
might
actually
look
like,
I
would
agree
with
councilmember
davis
right.
I
Obviously,
I
think
all
of
us
share
some
frustration,
and
I
know
that
this
is
not
the
intent
of
anyone
to
to
to
have
a
delay
as
we've
had
and
or
to
have
the
challenges
that
we've
been
facing,
but
we
we
do
want
to
get
to
a
resolution
so,
but
I
did
want
to
hear
from
staff
just
what
is
what
does
the
reality
of
of
our
chairs
direction?
Look
like
for
you
as
next
steps.
If
we
were
to
approve
that.
H
H
Yeah,
so
I
do
it.
There
is,
at
least
from
my
perspective,
some
concerns
with
that,
because
part
of
us,
you
know
modernizing
the
current
service
delivery
model
ties
in
directly
with
the
software.
So
so
it
would
be
hard
to
move
in
the
direction
we'd
like
to
move
with
the
software
without
changing
the
requirements
right.
G
H
That
would
move.
I
mean
right
now.
It's
my
understanding,
finance.
The
procurement
group
has
nine
other
pending
requests
for
proposals,
and
so
we
would
have
to
be
re-evaluated
and
and
re-prioritized
among
those
other
submissions,
and
so
if,
if
this
committee
were
to
direct
staff
to
prioritize
this
toast
offer
or
this
rfp
yes
that
would
that
would
help
to
expedite
our
process.
I
Yeah
and
I'm
curious
on
that
trade-off
right
so
like
what?
What
would
we
be
bumping
right?
That's
on
the
list,
potentially,
because
I'm
not
certain
of
what
these
nine
other
rfps
are
out
there
through
procurement.
So
I
don't
know
if
you
know
that
answer.
If
there's
anybody
in
the
city
manager's
office,
that
knows
that.
G
I
can
get
you
that
list,
I
would
not
want
to
speculate.
Obviously
this
is
one
of
our
biggest
bottlenecks
in
our
weak
spot
at
this
point
is
particularly
procurement
and
technology
procurement.
So
there
are,
they
did
the
board
that
does.
This
internally
has
gone
through
the
process,
but
I
don't
know
that
we
have
that
list
handy.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
grab
it
really
quick
and
get
back
to
you.
I
So
that
again,
that's
my
only
concern
is
I
want
to
just
be
totally
aware
of
what
tradeoffs
may
be
right.
What
if,
if
we're
going
to
say,
hey,
let's
prioritize
this,
let's
put
this
up
in
the
front
of
the
line,
then
there
may
be
something
else
that
equally
all
of
us
here
are
also
passionate
about
and
want
to
see,
and
I
just
don't
know
that
right,
I'm
not
aware
of
that.
So
I
would
like
to
have
that
answer
before
we
we
give
this
direction
so
and
I'm
fine.
B
Thanks
we
can
table
it.
I
know.
Councilmember
esparza
has
her
hand
up,
and
so,
while
kip
is
looking
for
the
answer,
we
can
certainly
have
council
member
esparza.
A
Yeah
I
I
was
actually
going
to
ask
some
of
the
same
questions.
He
did
so
I
and
I'm
comfortable
with
tabling
until
we
can
get.
I
I
My
understanding
is,
is
part
of
the
challenge.
With
some
of
these
vehicle
abatements
could
also
be
on
the
interpretation
of
you
know.
What
is
what
is
happening
with
the
vehicle
right?
Is
it
occupied
or
not,
and
and
then
a
vehicle
being
kind
of
cleared
out
of
out
of
the
system?
I
Is
there
any
work
being
done
to
try
and
identify
other
challenges
that
are
not
necessarily
directly
related
to?
You
know
the
workload
challenges
of
our
or
toe
companies,
the
technology
challenges,
but
something
with
actually,
you
know
the
way
that
we're
going
out
and
and
applying
our
own
set
of
rules
on
when
we
will
actually
tow
a
vehicle
or
a
beta
vehicle.
H
So
unfortunately,
dot's
not
with
us
today,
they
would
probably
be
best
to
help
answer
that
question,
but
I
can
tell
you
that
there
are,
you
know,
dmv
laws
that
require
us
to
go
through
through
a
certain
process
before
we
can
tow
a
vehicle.
So
I
mean
that
definitely
just
having
to
adhere
to
those
requirements
can
can
present
delays
or
challenges.
I
Okay,
yeah,
it
would
be
helpful
to
I
guess:
d.o.t
is
not
here.
My
my
understanding
is-
and
I
have
had
some
personal
experience
with
this-
where
I
think
the
wrong
interpretation
is
made
right
and
you
have
a
human
being.
That's
gonna,
you
know
evacuate
some
error
right
of
of
interpretation,
but
that
in
those
circumstances
we
may
have
vehicles
out
there
that
are
sort
of
getting
written
off
and
and
disqualified
from
being
abated
when
maybe
they
should
be,
and
yet
I
don't
know
right
how
best
to
resolve
that
other
than
right
is
it
auditing?
I
Is
it
training,
something
that
could
be
done
there
and,
if
you're
saying
maybe
it's
best
to
have
the
conversation
with
d.o.t?
I
just
think
that
this
that's
what
I
was
saying.
It's
it's
a
piece
of
this:
it's
not
exactly
directly
related
to
the
rfp
and
the
total
companies
themselves,
because
they're
gonna
right
once
we
get
to
that
point
and
they're
coming
out
and
deployed
and
ready
to
pick
it
up.
I
think
we
have
right.
We
understand
how
that
works.
I
This
is
the
in
between
where
somebody
is
making
an
actual
decision
on
it,
and
unfortunately,
I
think
that
that
interpretation
and
the
decisions
that
are
being
made
are
not
always
correct
and
we're
running
into
some
challenges
there.
So
that
was
all
my
questions,
though,
in
other
comments,
and
I
guess
we
can
table
for
now
until
we
have
better
understanding
from
the
city
manager's
office
on
those
tradeoffs.
A
G
Yes,
we're
also
I'll
have
this
conflict
for
you
in
a
second,
and
I
know,
jessica's
working
to
get
the
appropriate
folks
from
dot
on
the
line
to
have
the
larger
conversation.
So.
K
Our
assistant
director,
laura
wells,
is
actually
on
the
public
side
of
this
zoom,
so
we
can
easily
pull
her
over.
I
don't
want
to
misspeak
on
any
of
the
specifics
of
council
member
paralysis,
question.
G
Perfect,
so
if
we
could
ask
for
the
clerk
to
promote
her
to
a
panelist
and
then
pull
her
over
and
laura
can
address
some
of
the
council
members
questions
and
then
I'll
follow
up
as
soon
as
I
have
the
list.
A
Is
laura
joining
via
phone
number?
I
don't
currently
see
her
name,
but
I
do
have
a.
B
A
B
L
L
So,
as
we
usually
do
every
six
months,
or
so,
we
bring
together
a
competium
of
all
of
the
transportation
planning
efforts
we
have
going
on
in
the
city
and
that's
the
memo
you
received
for
this
item.
L
A
couple
highlights.
This
is
a
really
big
year
for
transportation,
planning
and
policy.
We've
been
doing
a
great
deal
of
work
to
bring
forward
the
plans
and
policies
needed
to
implement
the
council's
vision
from
the
general
plan,
as
well
as
the
climate
smart.
We
have
some
really
big
things
coming
this
year,
including
kind
of
an
order
of
appearance
for
the
full
council.
We
have
a
parking
and
transportation
demand
management.
L
As
we
do
with
each
report
here,
we
highlight
one
or
two
efforts
that
either
haven't
given
haven't
gotten
enough
exposure
to
counsel
or
otherwise
are
in
a
state
of
maturity
that
getting
input
from
from
the
committee
is
most
worthwhile.
This
time
we're
highlighting
the
west
san
jose
multi-modal
transportation
improvement
plan,
natasha
upfell
is
the
project
manager
of
that
and
she'll
be
taking
over
in
just
a
second
to
go
through
a
presentation
on
that.
L
It's
important
to
bring
up
how
these
multi-modal
transportation
improvement
plans
work
a
lot
of
times.
These
plans
have
overlapping
areas,
so
this
one,
for
example,
has
overlapping
areas
with
the
disc
process
plan,
as
well
as
the
in
process
downtown
transportation
plan.
These
overlapping
areas
help
us
align
what
the
projects
are
and
make
sure
that
the
the
overall
vision
and
attention
of
the
plans
congeals.
L
So
as
we
go
forward
to
implement
projects
we're
getting
the
right
direction
from
all
of
the
different
influences
that
need
to
get
in
there,
so
that
is
kind
of
the
way
the
geography
goes
works
together
also
for
each
plant
that
builds
on
top
of
the
next
one
right,
so
disk
was
already
adopted.
So
the
disk
plans
are
then
become
adopted,
existing
conditions
for
the
next
plan,
such
as
west
san
jose,
and
with
that
I'm
going
to
pass
it
off
to
natasha
upfelt,
to
dig
into
the
presentation.
L
C
I'll
see
the
correct
presenter
screen
great,
my
name
is
natasha
oppel
and
I'm
an
associate
transportation
specialist
with
san
jose
dot
in
the
planning
group,
and
I'm
here
to
talk
to
you
all
today
about
the
west,
san
jose
multimodal
transportation
improvement
plan
or
how
we
lovingly
shorten
it.
The
west
san
jose
m.
C
C
C
C
We
started
this
project
way
back
in
fall
of
2019
and
due
to
the
pandemic,
we
weren't
able
to
really
get
started
with
our
outreach
until
spring
and
summer
2021.
That's
when
we
kicked
off
community
outreach
phase,
one
with
a
large-scale
public
workshop
that
was
held
online.
We
presented
to
various
neighborhood
associations,
and
we,
you
know,
collected
all
of
that
data
to
propose
our
initial
projects.
C
C
So
here's
an
overview
of
our
outreach
to
date.
This
project
really
began
during
the
urban
village
development
phase,
so
dot
staff
was
present
at
almost
all
the
urban
village
workshops
and
focus
groups
to
hear
from
the
community
about
their
transportation
concerns
and
issues.
Then,
during
the
m-tip
outreach
phase,
one
we
held
that
large
scale
workshop.
We
did
various
tabling
events.
One
photo
is
from
starboard
park
movie
night
over
the
summer.
That
was
really
fun.
We
were
able
to
do
a
lot
of
these
outreach
events
in
spanish.
C
Then
we're
currently
wrapping
up
our
outreach
phase.
Two.
We
had
a
larger
scale
online
workshop
to
talk
about
the
proposed
projects.
We
will
be
holding
online
office
hours
to
discuss
the
final
draft
of
the
plan
with
interested
parties
and
we
will
be
attending
various
other
neighborhood
association
meetings
to
share
the
final
plan.
C
Sorry,
if
my
computer
is
stalling
there,
so
what
did
we
hear
from
all
this
outreach?
We
did.
We
heard
lots
of
things,
but
it
really
centered
around
three
key
transportation
themes.
One
was
the
need
for
pedestrian
improvements.
People
in
west
san
jose
want
to
feel
comfortable
and
safe,
while
they're
walking
around
more
trees
and
street
lighting,
safer
crossings
and
wider
sidewalks.
C
There
was
also
a
really
clear
call
for
improved
bike
infrastructure
and
connectivity.
People
wanted
more
protected
bike
lanes,
slower
vehicle
speeds
on
neighborhood
streets.
They
wanted
a
safe
place
to
park
their
bikes
when
they
got
to
where
they
were
going,
and
they
really
wanted
to
see
an
expansion
of
bike
share
and
other
micro
mobility
services
into
the
west
san
jose
area.
There
was
also
a
desire
for
better
public
transit
people
wanted
more
options.
They
wanted
to
get
there
fast
and
reliably
and
they
wanted
better,
first
and
last
mile
connections.
C
So
here
I'm
going
to
go
into
kind
of
the
key
proposal,
areas
that
the
mtip
is
looking
into.
So,
first
and
foremost,
you
really
wanted
to
anchor
a
lot
of
this
work
in
supporting
improved
transit
systems,
and
the
approach
to
the
west,
san
jose
m
tip
was
to
look
at
the
project
area
as
a
whole
and
identify
these
key
networks
where
we
could
do
these
improvements
holistically.
C
So
I'm
going
to
share
with
you
our
transportation
priority
corridor
network,
so
these
streets
are
highlighted
in
purple
and
these
are
key
corridors
where
we
will
improve
them
to
you
know:
facilitate
transit
first
things
such
as
public
service
lanes,
better
bus
stops,
and
I'm
going
to
share
a
little
bit
of
about
that
tool
box
with
you
right
now.
C
C
Bus
bulbs
to
help
you
know,
have
more
room
for
the
bus
to
pull
over
transit
priority,
signaling
new
and
improved
transit
services.
There's
a
ton
of
stuff
we
can
do
along
these
corridors
and
all
of
the
transit
priority
corridors
have
a
set
of
improvements
that
we're
recommending
as
part
of
this
plan.
C
C
You
can
see
that
those
transit
priority
corridors
are
also
in
this
as
the
purple
corridors.
That's
because,
like
I
mentioned,
every
person
taking
transit,
is
a
pedestrian
really
want
to
encourage
safe
access
to
transportation
to
and
from.
We
also
have
these
pedestrian
priority
corridors
in
yellow,
which
are
meridian
race
and
lincoln,
and
these
are
key
retail
corridors
that
we
think
we
can
enhance
the
pedestrian
experience
to
have
people
enjoy
their
time
on
the
street.
C
Another
touch
point
for
us
in
the
mtip:
it's
super
important
is
investing
in
comprehensible,
comprehensive
and
accessible
bike
infrastructure,
and
we
have
a
lot
of
bike
priority
corridors
identified
throughout
west
san
jose.
So
these
bike
priority
corridors
can
be
anything
from
a
bike
boulevard
which
is
encouraging
traffic
calming,
and
you
know
a
slow
calm
street
that
bikes
and
cars
can
share
and
also
you
know,
fully
protected
bike
lanes
and
we've
identified
projects.
You
know
that
cover
all
everything
in
between.
C
We
also
wanted
to
foster
beautiful
and
active
communities
through
place
making
so,
along
all
the
project,
priority
quarters
that
we
just
listed.
We
want
to
ensure
that
we're
taking
opportunities
to
invest
in
landscaping,
public
art
place
making
so
that
people
can
enjoy
the
street
as
they're.
You
know
traveling
through
it
and
finally,
with
all
these
infrastructure
improvements
that
we're
proposing.
We
really
wanted
to
support
that
infrastructure
with
programs
and
policies
that
encourage
sustainable
transportation
choices.
So,
within
the
m-tip
we
do
have
recommendations
to
explore
things
such
as
electric
vehicle
charging
stations.
C
Car
share
mobility
hubs,
which
are
kind
of
one-stop
shops
where
you
can
get
a
car
share,
get
on
transit,
have
micro,
mobility,
access
things
like
real-time
arrival
and
other
technological
advances.
We
can,
you
know,
put
near
transit
and
all
sorts
of
really
exciting
things.
C
C
C
So
projects
are,
you
know,
put
into
the
m-tip,
we
identify
funding,
we
develop
a
design,
we
construct
the
project
and
we
do
a
thorough.
Before
and
after
evaluation
of
each
project
and
throughout
all
of
these
phases,
we
do
community
outreach
to
ensure
that
the
public
you
know
knows
as
much
as
possible
about
these
projects
and
also
is
aware
of
the
decisions
that
can
be
made.
You
know
by
them
throughout
each
step,
so,
finally
I'll
open
it
up
to
questions
and
discussions.
C
E
N
All
right,
sorry
about
that
earlier,
I
just
wanted
to
like
go
back
to
earlier
and
thank
thank
you
dev
and
your
team
for
what
you're
doing
to
beautify
san
jose
we
get.
I
live
in
a
hot
spot
where
abandoned
cars
get
left
all
the
time.
So
I
appreciate
the
efforts
of
cleaning
up
the
streets
and
then
for
the
presentation
that
just
happened
right
now.
N
I
just
wanted
to
like
encourage.
I
don't
know
if
this
is
appropriate
to
encourage
this
or
not,
but
there's
been
like
a
lot
of
fatalities
like
from
people
actually
using
crosswalks,
but
it's
been
dark
in
the
darker
areas
and
then
people
get
hit
and
you
know
the
people
that
hit
them
don't
get
caught.
So
I
was
just
trying
to
see
if
there's
a
way
to
like
maybe
get
some
cameras
on
those.
N
That
you
guys
are
trying
to
get
into
all
these
dark
like
high-risk
zones.
That's
all
I
had
really.
I
don't
need
all
the
all
the
time,
but
thank
you.
F
Yeah.
Thank
you
thanks
thanks
to
the
transportation
team
for
this
report
and
as
ramsay
said,
you're
doing
a
whole
lot
around
the
city.
So
it's
it
doesn't
go
unnoticed
by
me
how
much
work
goes
into
each
of
these
plans
and
how
many
plans
you
have
going
at
the
same
time.
My
first
question
is
about
the
fact
that
there's
so
many
different
plans,
there's
some
sequence,
sequential
prioritization
of
you
know
which
plans
get
done
first.
Is
that
correct
so
so
like,
for
example,
this
plan
is
ahead
of
the
my
understanding.
F
L
Yeah
I
mean
it
really
has
to
do
with
resources
and
then
timing
into
when
those
resources
came
in
and
then
also
we
do
a
little
prioritization
around
kind
of
where
lots
of
development
is
coming
in
in
particular
and
kind
of
need
to
map
up
things
right
so
or
match
things
up.
So
why
is
this
one
in
front
of
the
berryessa?
F
L
Right,
so
there
is
an
order,
is
it
prioritized
kind
of
beforehand,
not
necessarily
right,
just
I'll
say
two
things
one?
Yes,
it's
prioritized
in
the
sense
of
when
we
choose
to
go,
get
grants
we're
prioritizing
the
areas
that
we
see
the
most
need.
What
is
what
defines
the
most
need
right?
Usually
that
there's
the
most
change
coming
to
an
area-
that's
that's
foreseeable
right
and
so
downtown,
as
we
all
know,
is,
is
blossoming
west
san
jose.
L
What's
interesting,
there
is
the
transportation
plan.
Most
of
its
conclusions
were
integrated
into
the
urban
village
plan.
We're
still
gonna
get
the
the
m-tip
there
move
forward,
but
we
didn't
see
as
much
urgency
since
much
of
its
impact
was
already
incorporated
in
the
urban
village
plan,
yeah
yeah,
so
there's
kind
of
multiple
layers
there
right
initial
yeah,
anyways
I'll,
stop
there
yeah.
F
L
L
Important
right
I
mean
these
plans
are
multi-layered
right,
there's
big
projects
that
will
take
10
20
years
to
get
done
and
there's
things
that
will
get
done
in
the
next
pavement
cycle
right,
and
so
these
plans
have
pretty
large
swaths
of
time
in
terms
of
when
they're
actually
going
to
get
done
in
terms
of
all
the
projects
enumerated
based
on
the
complexity,
funding
and
then
prioritization
and
I'll
put
one
other
chip
in
here.
F
Right
and
and
that's
important
is
when
you're
trying
to
do
bike
connectivity,
for
example.
You
can't
really
just
do
one
part.
You
have
to
do
the
whole
thing
natasha.
I
know
you
were
told
to
stop
sharing
your
slides,
but
I
wanted
to
go
back
to
just
quickly
go
back
to.
There
was
one
slide
that
had
that
was
the
introduction
slide
to
the
bike
lane
infrastructure.
I
don't
know
what
I
don't
didn't
see
your
slide
number,
so
I'm
not
sure
which
slide
it
was.
But
the
slide
right
before
that.
I
think.
F
You
don't
have
to
put
it
in
presentation
mode,
but
I
just
wanted
to
quickly
look
at
it
just
to
slide
for
reference
that
one.
You
know
the
reason
I'm
bringing
this
up
is
you
know.
I've
had
some
conversations
with
folks
about
this
idea
of
trying
to
do
greening.
At
the
same
time
as
we
do
bike
lanes-
and
I
know
these
are
generic
pictures
that
you've
gotten
from
somewhere,
but
we,
you
know,
we've
typically
done
baller
delineators
right
between
transport,
vehicle
lanes
and
bike
lanes.
F
It
would
be
great-
and
I've
talked
to
some
folks
about
whether
it's
possible
to
pilot
in
certain
places,
this
sort
of
green
type
of
separation,
where
you
put
back
in
some
some
green
space
and
have
allow
for
some,
you
know
natural
drainage
and
keep
things
out
of
the
sewer
syst.
You
know
filter
water
as
it
goes
back
into
the
ground.
F
In
addition
to
making
things
look
better.
I
know
this
is
a
budget
question
as
to
whether
we
have
budget,
but
I'm
curious
as
to
whether
we
might
identify
some
locations,
whether
it's
within
the
west,
san
jose
plan
or
elsewhere.
To
do
it
this
way
and
see
how
it
goes
and
think
of
this
as
a
goal,
because,
as
we
repave
streets,
we're
not
doing
it,
I
wonder
if
we
might
try
that.
K
Through
through
the
chair,
if
it's
okay,
this
is
jessica,
zanck,
deputy
director,
it's
a
great
point:
councilmember
cohen
we've
been
working
with
many
other
departments,
including
public
works
and
environmental
services,
to
really
improve
our
game
on
urban
greening
in
general
and
green
stormwater
infrastructure,
as
a
subset
of
that
for
all
the
runoff
reasons,
and
to
try
to
implement
those
with
our
complete
street
projects,
it
is
a
considerably
larger
capital
project,
especially
when
you
are
going
into
the
ground
and
you're
digging
to
to
get
this
these
types
of
multi-benefits,
but
it's
something
very
top
of
mind
for
us.
K
As
the
short
answer
we
have
secured
some
grant
funds
that
will
allow
us
to
do
more
of
these,
especially
one
of
those
was
a
second
avenue
in
seattle.
I
believe
where
the
planting
is
above
ground
slightly
easier
to
pull
off
and
so
we're
working
on
a
couple.
Applications
of
that
and
some
of
our
grant
applications
going
in
in
a
week
and
a
half
to
the
active
transportation
program
do
include
you
know
many
more
trees
and
gsi
potential
locations
in
in
the
ground
as
well.
F
F
Last
question:
it's
not
in
your
presentation,
but
in
the
actual
memo
report,
there's
a
section
on
electric
mobility
roadmap
and
electric
vehicle
adoption.
I
saw
a
note
that
the.
F
Drive
electric
program
was
kind
of
put
on
hold,
and
I
know
that
was
partly.
It
was
due
due
to
the
pandemic
at
the
time,
but
there's
some
note
there
about
global
shortage
and
other
things,
but
obviously,
given
what
we're
going
to
hear
in
the
presentation
coming
up
later
on
electrification
on
climate,
carbon
neutrality
and
and
the
goal
to
try
to
get
80
of
new
vehicles
to
electric.
Obviously
this
is
a
important
part
of
it.
F
What
are
our
thoughts
about,
or
your
thoughts
about
when
we
might
start
excuse
me
this
program
again
helping
educate
buyers
before
they
buy
on
the
benefits
and
the
affordability
and
what
kind
of
programs
are
out
there
to
help
them
buy
electric
vehicles.
L
Yeah
as
you'll
hear
in
our
in
our
final
item
on
this
agenda,
electrification
is
huge
if
we're
going
to
get
to
our
2030
goals
right
of
zero
emissions,
and
so
education
is
definitely
going
to
be
part
of
that
program
and
we're
trying
to
resource
it
right
because
it
takes
a
lot
of
money
to
to
get
people
in
to
get
the
right
resources
to
them
and
all
that.
So
we
are
waiting
for
the
next
budget
to
get
finalized
to
hopefully
get
some
more
council.
L
Sorry,
council
councils,
for
it
sure,
but
to
get
more
staff
members
to
help
us
get
those
kinds
of
educational
possibilities
out
there.
We
are
continuing
to
discuss
with
the
organizations
that
we
work
with
on
the
first
rounds
of
this
future
rounds.
So
it
is
in
our
work
plan
to
continue
it
and
we
will.
We
will
see
it
happening
exactly
when
isn't
totally
clear,
but
it
will
be
yeah.
It's
in
our
workflow.
F
You
know
what
what
it
means
to
electrify
and
and
dispel
the
myths
that
it's
expensive
for
people
to
do
it
because,
as
you
said,
it's
expensive,
but
it's
maybe
there's
a
cost
to
the
program
and
maybe
there's
a
little
bit
of
upfront
cost
to
help
cost
shifting.
But
in
reality,
if
not
already,
certainly
in
the
future,
it
actually
is
cheaper
to
own
an
electric
vehicle
than
traditional
combustion
engine
vehicles.
F
If
we
don't
start
doing
that,
now
we're
going
to
have
a
lot
of
new
ice
vehicles
on
the
road
rather
than
electric
vehicles,
when
it
is
when
we
get
to
2030,
because
people
will
buy
cars
between
now
and
then
so.
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
point
and
hope
that
we,
sooner
rather
than
later,
get
back
to
programs
that
are
going
to
help
people
make
that
transition.
I
Yeah
that
one
thank
you,
so
I
was
curious.
I
I
appreciate
the
the
east-west
connection
that
that
direct
line
moore
park,
but
northwest
or
excuse
me
north-south,
is
is
obviously
disjointed
and
you
don't
have
a
solid
kind
of
roadway
there.
As
far
as
I'm
concerned,
and
I
I've
ridden
winchester
a
lot
on
my
bike.
My
parents
have
to
live
off
of
winchester
and
I
grew
up
over
off
of
stevie's
peak
boulevard
in
west
san
jose
and
not
much
just
changed.
I
Unfortunately,
for
for
the
access,
especially
for
bikes
and
winchester,
is
just
terribly
dangerous
to
ride
your
bike,
and
when
I
saw
the
the
sort
of
the
transit
priority
corridor
and
improvements
that
could
be
done
there
and
and
not
really
any
what
what
didn't
look
like.
So
that's
my
question.
It
will
be,
but
what
didn't
look
like
any
benefit
to
potential
bicyclists
that
may
end
up
using
winchester,
and
I
will
say,
based
on
this
map,
I
think
people
will
continue
to
use
winchester.
I
Even
as
you
know,
you
know
dangerous
as
it
may
be,
but
I
was
kind
of
hoping
that
there
would
be
in
this
plan
some
improvements
there.
So
is
there
something
maybe
that
dives
a
little
deeper
that
I'm
not
seeing
or
or
am
I
reading
everything
correctly
based
on
the
presentation
here
in
the
maps
that
winchester
is
not
really
going
to
get
any
sort
of
bike
improvement.
C
I
can
expand
a
little
bit
on
that,
so
these
maps
are
our
modal
priority
network,
so
that
is
just
establishing
when
put
when
push
comes
to
shove,
and
we
run
out
of
space
what
will
get
the
priority
and
for
all
of
our
I'll
go
back
to
this
map
really
quickly
for
most
of
our
transit
priority
corridors
such
as
winchester,
bascom
and
stevens
creek.
Through
our
bike
plan,
we
have
identified
that,
like
you,
said,
really
extensive
bike.
Improvements
need
to
be
made,
but
we
need
to
get
really
creative
when
balancing
those
with
transit.
C
So
this
just
establishes
the
modal
priority
that
you
know
when
when
we
get
these
trade-offs,
transit
will
come
first,
but
that
doesn't
mean
that
bike
improvements
will
not
be
considered
every
step
of
the
way
and
the
most
you
know
the
safest
bike.
Improvements
won't
be
considered
so
for
bascom.
A
C
Process,
it's
also
in
the
memo.
I
didn't
have
time
to
talk
about
it
today,
but
you
know
bike
safety
will
be
considered
along
the
whole
way.
It's
just
a
really
kind
of
when
we
look
curb
to
curb
street
space
and
we're
doing
those
equations
of
what
can
fit.
C
I
I
I
don't
think
so,
so
I
so
in
regards
to
specifically
like
winchester,
I
know
there's
certain
places
that
don't
even
have
a
sidewalk
right,
because
some
of
these
places
that
have
been
incorporated
and
properties
that
literally
stretch
out
to
the
roadway-
I
don't
know
how
we
deal
with
that,
but
obviously
it's
a
challenge
right
to
make
a
challenge
for
everybody,
for
pedestrians
and
bicyclists
makes
a
challenge
for
what
we
may
do
on
the
roadway.
I
I
There
were
times
where
I
would
race
the
bus
on
my
bicycle,
and
I
would
I
would
literally
beat
it
from
from
stop
light
to
stop
light,
at
least
for
you
know
about
a
mile
or
two
and
then
and
then
I'd
get
tired
and
would
would
stop
racing
it
and
it
would
it
would.
It
would
beat
me,
but
you
could
essentially
ride
your
bike.
You
know
between
stop
lights,
sometimes
right
as
fast
as
or
faster
than
the
bus,
and
so
in
that
sense
right,
I
I
would
agree
with.
We
absolutely
need
to
have.
I
You
know
some
priority
on
on.
How
do
we
move
transit
faster,
like
some
of
the
dedicated
lanes,
and
so
I
you
know.
I
appreciate
that.
I
I
just
also
know
that
you
know
there
are
some
very
dangerous
parts
where
you
know
having
even
just
some
form
of
dedicated
space
or
marking
right
is
better
than
nothing
is
better
than
what
would
exist
today,
and
I
think,
if
we're
going
to
master
planet
like
we
are,
we
should
be
incorporating
that
and-
and
so
that's
what
I
didn't
necessarily
see
in
the
presentation
and
and
was
curious
about
that,
I
think
your
answer
spells
it
out
better
though.
Lastly,
as
we
know,
santa
clara
or
excuse
me,
stevens
creek
is
bordered
by
santa
clara.
I
How
are
we
working
with
them,
because
they're
on
the
right,
essentially
they're
on
the
partner
end
of
us
right
there
on
a
lot
of
those
major
intersections
and
and
so
just
what
does
that
look
like?
As
far
as
you
know,
partnership
for
the
improvements
going
along
steven
street.
L
Thank
you,
council
member,
a
great
question:
we've
been
working
for
the
last
few
years
at
a
staff
level,
as
well
as
the
elected
player,
to
bring
us
all
together
all
the
way
from
cupertino's
end
down
by
de
anza
college,
all
the
way
through
san
carlos
to
to
diridon
to
get
us
on
the
same
page
as
what's
happening
on
stephens
creek
boulevard.
L
As
you
may
remember,
there's
a
official
committee
of
electeds
from
along
the
corridor,
stephen's
creek
steering
committee,
that's
chaired
by
the
vice
mayor,
our
vice
mayor,
and
we
now
have
all
almost
all
of
the
council's
set
up
to
fund
a
joint
vision
study
and
that
vision
city
is
going
to
look
at
the
whole
corridor
and
bring
us
all
together
into
a
single
direction
as
to
what
we're
going
to
be
doing.
D
L
Corridor
and
then
lead
us
to
you,
know,
working
towards
the
grants
and
all
the
other
funding
we'll
need
to
do
that
as
an
initial.
I
L
Work
requires,
you
know,
inner
jurisdictional.
You
know
clear,
given
shared
direction.
I
Okay,
yeah,
that's
that's
helpful.
There
I
mean
we
for
that
large
section.
We
split
it
right
down
the
median
right,
and
so
it's
almost
like
you're
fenced
with
your
neighbor
right.
It's
like
hey.
I
I
want
to
change
the
fence
and
right
and
so
yeah
I
mean
I,
I
think,
all
the
plans
that
we
have
are
great,
but
but
absolutely
on
that
large
segment
there
good
to
hear
that
that
you
know
we're
we're
continuing
to
work
together
on
that
and
and
hopefully
that
doesn't
stall
our
our
progress
if
we
start
making
some
progress
out
there
in
west
san
jose
and
we're
able
to
align
both
of
that
those
bodies
work,
okay,
that
was
it.
Thank
you.
B
A
B
I
C
G
Yes,
we
are,
and
we
can
either
start
with
if,
if
the
clerk
can
assist
me
in
promoting
laura
wells
from
a
participant
who
is
now
actually
a
participant
into
the
panel,
we
can
deal
with
that
com,
part
of
the
conversation
first
and
then
afterwards,
I'm
prepared
to
walk
us
through
a
visual
representation
of
how
we
approach
the
prioritization
and
how
it
relates
back
to
your
memo,
chairperson.
So
I
suggest
we
do
it
in
that
order.
If
that's
okay,.
B
B
I
Yeah,
it
was
more
of
a
rant
for
a
while
and
then
it
it
ended
in
a
question,
but
so
yeah
I'll
try
to
spare
specular.
I
I
was
really
curious
on.
Is
there
a?
Is
there
something
else
we
could
do
to
try
and
relieve
where
I
feel
there
may
be
some
some
challenge
in
getting
vehicles
abated?
That
has
to
do
with
sort
of
just
people
perception
and
maybe
error
in
perception
on.
Does
a
vehicle
qualify
or
not
and
it
would
be
in
the
process
between?
I
Obviously
somebody
reporting
it,
whoever
reports
it
it
gets
reported
and
then
getting
disqualified
from
being
abated,
so
it
never
even
really
makes
it
to
our
toe
company,
so
not
exactly
in
line
with
right
that
the
tow
companies,
the
contracts
that
we're
discussing,
but
I
think
in
line
with
the
frustration
that
a
lot
of
our
community
members
have
and
in
part
of
the
equation
on
on
why
some
of
these
vehicles
are
not
getting
abated,
and
so
my
question
was
around
you
know:
is
this
better
training?
I
Is
there
something
else
that
we
could
do?
Are
you
guys
aware
of
you
know
any
any
hiccups
here?
I
know
I've
had
conversations
with
both
your
department
and
city
manager's
office
and
there
have
been
instances
where
they've
been
caught,
but
they've
really
just
been
kind
of
one-off
and
it's
hey
it's
you
know,
mistakes
happen,
and
I
would
agree
with
that
because
it's
you
know
this
is
a
perception
error,
but
we're
just
curious
on
your
feedback
on
that.
As
part
of
this
overall
challenge
with
vehicle
payment.
K
Good
good
questions,
councilmember,
corrales
and
I'll
say
all
of
the
above.
You
know,
as
as
many
of
you
know,
on
the
council.
Our
vehicle
abatement
program
is
different
now
than
it
was
pre-coveted,
and
our
program
now
is
a
hybrid
model
where
we
are
proactively
covering
the
entire
city.
K
You
know,
at
least
I
would
say
every
street
we're
reaching
about
twice
a
month
and
then
we're
also
responding
to
concerns
that
come
in
through
3-1-1
and
what
we
are
looking
for
are
the
worst
of
the
worst,
those
vehicles
that
are
inoperable
as
as
determined
by
the
state
that
they
they
provide
the
criteria
for
an
officer
to
be
able
to
immediately
tow
a
vehicle
and
then
for
those
that
are
significantly
blighted.
K
We
are
marking
those
vehicles
and
following
up
and
if
their
vehicle
is
still
there
in
a
certain
period
of
time
over
72
hours,
then
it
is
toe
eligible.
The
challenge.
I
Can
I
pause
you
real
real,
quick
just
because,
based
on
what
you
were
saying
to
get
a
little
more
specific,
it's
it's
not
the
state
right,
making
a
determination
right.
The
state
makes
up
the
the
policies,
it's
a
it's
a
person
right
that
interprets
those
and
says:
does
this
qualify
or
not?
And
so
what
I'm?
What
I'm
curious
about?
Because
I
know
this
perception
has
changed,
given
what
what
person
goes
out
given
right,
who
looks
at
this
and
it's
totally
inconsistent
and
I'm
and
I'm
and
I'm
I'm
not
knocking
on
anybody.
I
But
I
we
see
this
where
right,
where
we
get
some
vehicles
that
you
know,
I
think
ideally
should
have
been
and
would
have
qualified,
and
it
only
comes
up
time
to
time,
because
you
know
I'm
not
out
there
auditing
this,
I'm
not
spot
checking
it's
just
eventually.
If
something
gets
risen
as
a
big
enough
complaint
right,
then
it
gets
maybe
a
little
bit
more
investigation
and
ultimately
comes
to
find
out
every
now
and
then
it's
like
oh
yeah.
I
Maybe
this
vehicle
should
have
qualified,
but
it
wasn't,
and
so
that's
kind
of
what
I'm
looking
for
is.
How
do
we
become
more
consistent
right
with
the
actual
perception
and
interpretation
of
the
state
policies
and
then
saying
yep?
This
vehicle
should
be
a
priority
for
abatement.
We,
you
know
our
own
policies
as
well
right
and
that
that's
where
I'm
seeing
some
inconsistencies
and
that's
why
I
was
asking:
is
it
training?
Is
it
you
know
auditing
what?
What
might
that
be?
That
helps
us
get
more
consistent
on
there.
K
So
the
this,
the
state
criteria
is
fairly
black
and
white.
Is
it
missing
a
steering
wheel?
Is
it
missing
an
engine,
and
is
that
something
that
the
the
officer
can
see
where,
where
there's
some
discretion
is
on
the
other
side,
where
we're
looking
at
a
vehicle
and
determining?
Is
it
significantly
blighted
and
with
the
proposed
budget
with
the
city
manager's
proposed
budget
that
that
is
before
council?
K
K
So
there
will
be
some
additional.
You
know,
assuming
that
the
proposed
budget
is
adopted.
K
Additional
criteria
that
that
can
be
used,
but,
yes,
absolutely
you
know
training.
You
know.
Additional
training
can
always
occur
as
well
as
improving
our
ability
to
get
the
criteria
out
to
the
public.
K
We
use
a
variety
of
means
now:
the
311
platform,
the
our
website,
you
know
putting
information
out
on
next
door,
but
you
know
we
can
always
improve
in
that
arena.
I
I
How
do
we
do
better
at
interpreting
correctly
some
of
these
vehicles
and
and
again,
I
you
know-
there's
all
sorts
of
accusations
out
there
from
community
members
right
of
people
that
are
being
favored
or
playing
favoritism
to
certain
residents
and
vehicle
owners,
people
they're,
potentially
lazy,
right
and
don't
want
to
come
out
and
do
things
and
I
and
and
I
don't
jump
to
any
of
those
conclusions-
I'm
just
trying
to
find
out.
I
That's
literally
right
up
on
some
sort
of
bricks
or
jacks,
or
something
or
hubcaps,
or
I
mean
on
the
rim
and
you
know
and
got
you
know
a
pile
of
trash
or
leaves
or
whatever,
underneath
it
because
it's
been
there
for
you,
know
nine
months
and
it's
been
reported
numerous
times
and
you
know
you
can
verify
nobody's
living
there,
that
kind
of
stuff,
and
it
does
happen
time
to
time
and
and
you
hear
that
oh
wait,
it's
been
cleared
out
a
couple
of
times
as
you
know,
didn't
qualify
and
it's
just
a
head
scratcher,
and
so
so
that
was
that
was
it.
I
I
appreciate
you
jumping
on
for
that.
I
know
we
had
another
part
of
the
question
that
I
was
curious
about,
which
was
on
the
trade-offs
of
if
we
were
to
approve
our
chairs
memo-
and
I
don't
think
you're
here
to
answer
that
one,
but
I
think
kip
was
gonna
answer
that
one.
G
G
You
should
be
seeing
the
recommendation
from
the
chair
in
her
memo
here,
so
the
first
three
items
purchasing
the
software
through
existing
cooperative
agreement,
contract
with
other
vendors
or
sole
source
or
sort
of
alternatives
to
doing
an
rfp
and
those
if
those
are
feasible,
those
would
not
require
kind
of
the
reprioritization.
G
So
the
question
is
related
to
what
it
would
be.
What
would
be
the
impact
of
the
reprioritization?
What
else
is
in
in
the
process
so
very
quickly
without
bogging
you
down
in
our
internal
bureaucracy
too
much
the
we've,
because
procurement
is
one
of
our
biggest
pain
points
right
now,
and
especially
technology
procurement.
G
We've
established
an
internal
board
which
includes
a
number
of
different
stakeholders
to
review
all
of
the
rfps
and
evaluate
are
the
potential
requests
for
proposals
and
evaluate
them
in
terms
of
readiness,
degree
of
complexity,
priority
alignment,
opportunity,
cost
duration
and
risk
and
sort
of
then
evaluate
them
against
each
other.
That
gives
us
basically,
then
three
buckets
and
I'll
just
go
very
quickly
over
those
three
buckets.
G
The
first
one
is
those
that
are
actually
in
flight
and
so
to
give
you
a
sense
of
what's
ongoing,
you
see
eight
projects
here,
the
everything
from
the
broadband
equipment
services,
which
is
much
of
the
east
side,
community
wi-fi,
as
well
as
our
downtown
community,
wi-fi
security
guard
services,
financial
services,
lab
library,
management,
traffic,
signals,
payroll,
recreation,
management
and
graffiti.
So
all
of
these
are
in
flight
and
would
obviously
stay
in
flight.
G
Having
said
that,
I
think
if,
if
the
folks
who
are
on
the
that
internal
group
were
here,
I
think
they
would
request
that,
rather
than
council
trying
to
direct
us
to
a
certain
place
on
the
priority
queue
that
they
sort
of
give
their
effort
to
sort
of,
as
has
been
worded,
that
this
is
perceived
as
a
priority
and
should
be
our
should
be
evaluated.
As
such,
when
you
do
this
reprioritization
and
the
current
process
and
I'll
stop
after
this
once
that
piece
is
resubmitted,
it
would
be
reprioritized
within
this
queue.
G
So
back
to
the
beginning,
I
know
I
said
I
would
stop,
but
these
first
three
items
are
really
alternatives
to
doing
an
rfp
and
then
the
last
piece
would
put
it
in
competition
if
you
will
not
with
the
ones
that
are
in
flight,
but
with
those
eight
that
are
in
queue.
So
I
will
stop
here
and
council
member
perales.
If
there's
an
additional
clarification,
I
can
give
you
I'm
happy
to
give
it
a
shot.
I
No,
that
is
very
helpful
and
also
very
confusing,
because
I
won't
help
me
make
any
as
far
as
any
decision
on
prioritization,
but
it
does
help
me
to
to
move
the
chairs
memo
and
I
think,
with
just
the
specificity
of
what
you
just
said
at
the
end
there,
which
would
be
that
right
if
we
are
going
to
to
bump
it
up
in
the
list
and
do
some
re-prioritization
that
it's
not
the
council
telling
you
hey,
move
this
one
from
number
five
right
that
you
guys
will
will
make
that
decision
and
and
then
obviously,
hopefully,
it's
potentially
easier
right
as
our
our
chair
has
proposed
a
couple
other
opportunities
that
it
wouldn't
even
require
the
reprioritization.
A
Thanks,
so
I
wanted
to
go
back
to
something
earlier
about
the
rfp
does
moving
this
memo
impact
the
timeline
for
the
rfp
that
rachel
referred
to
earlier.
Does
it
does
it
stop
that
integration?
I
I
want
to
hear
from
kip
as
well.
Does
it
stop
the
integration
with
3-1-1.
G
G
H
G
A
Okay,
all
right,
that's
helpful!
I
you
know
my
my
preference
actually
would
have
been
to
come
back
with
a
lot
more
detail
to
have
a
deeper
conversation
on
this,
but
I'm
so
I
I
would
add
that,
where
we
vote
and
approve
on
the
motion,
councilmember
perales,
would
you
be
willing
to
accept
an
amendment
to
have
a
report
back
to
us
on
the
next
tne
meeting?
It's.
B
It
that's
okay,
I
think
it's
in
the.
I
think
it's
in
the
discussion,
not
in
the
recommendations.
I
Raise
it
up
from
the
discussion
portion
of
the
memo
just
to
make
it
clear,
yeah.
A
Yeah
you're
right,
I
see
it.
Thank
you,
chair
davis,
too,
that
this
reports
back
to
the
committee
of
august
tv.
I
that's
okay,
I'm
good,
I'm
good
with
it.
Thank
you.
You.
A
Yeah
I'll
second,
the
motion-
and
I
and
I
I'll
add
that
kip
for
that
august
meeting
can
we
have
much
more
detail
so
that
we
can
have
a
deeper
discussion
at
that
time?.
G
G
A
Yes,
madam
chair
and
council
member
committee
members,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
talking
about
the
scope
of
a
work,
the
work
plan
with
respect
to
the
tne
so
to
the
extent
that
you're
going
to
try
to
re-evaluate
other
types
of
items
that
are
not
within
the
work
plan.
I
think
you.
A
One
item
that
is
clearly
within
your
plan
and
then
as
to
the
other
two
items
on
whether
or
not
it
can
be
a
sole
source
or
whether
or
not
it
can
be
added
to
an
amendment
to
another
contract.
Those
are
both
legal
issues
that
would
need
to
be
explored
and
the
way
I
understood
the
memorandum
was
that
if
those
other
two
issues,
weren't
feasible,
then
you're
returning
back
with
the
priority.
B
F
B
K
K
As
you
are
aware,
we
regularly
report
on
regional
transportation
activities,
bringing
either
quarterly
or
moving
forward
semi-annually
to
this
committee
items
of
interest
and
the
bart
silicon
valley
extension
phase,
two
is
certainly
of
interest,
and
so
we've
asked
bernice
to
come
and
give
an
update,
especially
as
the
bart
silicon
valley
program
has
hit
some
really
important
milestones
of
late.
So
bernice
I
am
going
to
share
screen,
and
you
will
just
cue
me
when
to
move
it
forward,
for
you.
O
Great
thank
you
jessica
and
thank
you
to
the
chair
and
committee
members
of
the
transportation
environmental
committee
for
giving
me
the
opportunity
to
present
today
I'm
going
to
give
you
an
update
on
some
of
the
key
activities
and
aspects
of
the
bart
silicon
valley
project
phase.
Two
next
slide.
Please.
O
This
is
our
new
map
showing
sort
of
how
the
project
alignment
lays
within
the
city
of
san
jose
and
into
the
city
of
santa
clara.
As
a
reminder,
the
project
is
six
miles
long
and
features
a
five
mile
tunnel
with
four
stations.
Three
of
those
are
subway
stations
in
san
jose
and
when
we
say
subway
stations,
we
are
referring
to
that.
You
board
the
train
platforms
underground,
but
these
stations
will
have
an
above-ground
presence
and
then
we
have
our
at-grade
station
in
the
city
of
santa
clara.
O
O
O
We
are
planning
to
begin
passenger
service
sometime
around
the
late
2030
time
frame,
as
you
can
see
in
the
list
of
activities
in
the
current
planning,
engineering
and
procurement
phase,
that's
the
second
column
on
the
right,
developing
the
construction,
outreach
management
program
and
we'll
go
into
more
detail
on
that.
It's
one
of
the
activities
that
we
are
undertaking
in
this
phase
and
the
construction
man
transportation
management
plan,
which
we
call
the
ctmps,
are
important.
Subcomponents
of
the
construction
outreach
and
management
program,
there
will
be
more
detailed
information
about
the
comp
and
ctmp.
O
The
federal
government
to
date
has
made
a
commitment
of
a
planned
425
million
to
the
phase
ii
project.
We
got
a
commitment
of
125
million
in
august
of
2019,
another
100
million
in
august
of
2021,
and
then
we
just
received
a
proposed
allocation
of
200
million
in
the
president's
budget
proposed
budget
for
fy
2023
next
slide.
Please.
O
This
is
how
our
contract
packages
are
arranged.
We
have
four
major
contracts
for
the
phase
two
program.
Our
cp1
contract
package
resulted
from
lessons
learned
on
our
various
extension
project.
This
really
is
every
aspect
of
the
extension
and
how
we
operate
and
integrate
with
the
bart
system.
So
it's
all
the
technical
communications
and
train
operations
of
the
system,
our
cp2
package.
This
is
the
package
that
the
vta
board
just
gave
authorization
to
the
general
manager
to
execute
a
contract
with
key
witch,
shea
trailer
jv
and
that's
for
our
tunnel
and
track
work.
O
This
contract
package
will
be
delivered
in
two
major
phases:
phase.
One
is
what
we've
been
given
the
authority
to
execute
that
that
is
to
advance
the
design
and
do
a
more
cost
certain
and
schedule
certain
program
for
the
tunnel
and
track
work
elements
and
the
second
phase
of
this
contract
stage
two
will
be
for
the
actual
boring
of
the
tunnel
and
doing
the
the.
What
do
I
want
to
say
the
shafts
for
the
future
stations,
so
that
kind
of
goes
into
where
we
are
I'm
going
to
skip
over
to
cp4.
O
We
are
holding
off
on
the
procurement
for
our
cp4
contract,
that
is,
the
contract
for
the
three
city
of
san
jose
stations
and
because
there's
that
interdependent
relationship
between
the
shafts
for
the
cp2
contract
and
how
the
stations
will
be
built
on
those
shafts
and
how
those
will
be
configured
and
we're
still
working
on
some
of
those
refinements,
we're
holding
off
and
we've
shelved
those
cp4
stations
contract.
The
cp3
contract
is
for
the
santa
clara
station
and
the
rail
and
maintenance
facility
in
the
city
of
santa
clara
and
I'm
good
for
the
next
slide.
O
So
this
is
our
procurement
timeline
and
our
status
to
date
is
the
final
rfp
for
contract
package,
one
that
was
that
systems
contract
which
focuses
on
the
systems
for
the
overall
project
is
slated
to
be
issued
this
summer
for
cp2,
which
focuses
on
the
tunnel
and
track
work.
As
I
mentioned,
we
gave
the
authority
to
the
vta
general
manager
to
execute
that
contract.
O
We're
going
to
be
beginning
the
stage
one
services
I
believe
on
last
friday,
we
got
our
limited
notice
proceed
to
do
that.
As
I
mentioned
the
final
rfp
for
cp3
santa
clara
station,
that
is
going
to
be
co-located
with
the
yard
that
is
expected
to
be
released.
At
the
end
of
this
summer,
we've
released
a
draft
and
we're
working
on
the
final
configuration
for
that
final
rfp
and
then,
as
I
mentioned,
on
the
cp4,
we're
targeting
now
about
a
quarter.
O
20
quarter,
two
of
2024
for
awarding
the
station's
contract
for
those
three
stations
in
the
city
of
san
jose
and
next
slide.
Erica.
O
This
is
the
station
site
plan
for
the
little
portionable
28th
street
station.
The
purple
circle
is
the
actual
above
ground
station
head
house
that
you
see
right
there.
Thanks
for
the
cursor
appreciate
that
jess,
the
red
outline
is
our
construction
staging
area.
That
is
the
entire
area
that
vta
will
be
procuring
and
also
including
the
street,
and
that
little
portion
on
the
bottom
is
where
we
have
the
former
railroad
corridor.
That
will
be
the
future
part
of
the
trail
system.
O
The
station
entrance
shown
in
purple
is
on
the
corner
of
the
site
closest
to
28th
street
in
santa
clara
street.
The
green
boxes
represent
the
underground
platform,
so
those
two
green
long
boxes.
Those
are
both
the
north
and
south
platforms
for
boarding
addition
to
the
stations
themselves.
There
will
be
facilities
for
people
who
walk
roll
and
take
transit
they're
in
slated
to
be
installed
as
part
of
the
phase
two
project
for
the
28th
street
little
portugal
station.
These
facilities
include
the
plaza
area.
It's
where
that
little
orange
circle
is
right.
O
There
also
includes
a
building
excellent
entrance
on
the
back
side,
where
you
see
those
green
platforms,
so
you
can
enter
the
building
from
both
sides,
the
front
and
back
where
the
red
arrow
is
or
directly
behind.
That
also
includes
a
share
path
along
28th
street
sidewalks
raised
and
high
visibility
crosswalks.
O
So
there
is
a
safe
crossing
from
the
other
side
of
28th
street
and
the
plaza
and
the
the
trail,
and
then
we
will
be
doing
signals
on
the
street
lights
so
that
we
can
ensure
safety
for
those
who
walk,
we're,
also
providing
250,
unsecured
and
secured
bike
parking
spaces,
and
you
can
see
this
is
centered
between
101
right
there,
so
just
on
the
west
side
of
highway
101.
O
This
gives
you
a
good
idea
of
a
conceptual
architectural
rendering
of
the
28th
street
little
portugal
station,
because
the
station
is
at
the
center
of
the
city
of
san
jose's,
portuguese
community
and
many
other
multicultural
communities.
The
station
is
designed
to
reflect
those
multicultural
heritage
that
surround
it.
It's
designed
to
complement
the
five
wounds:
portuguese
national
parish.
It
also
incorporates
traditional
portuguese
design
treatments,
including
red
and
white
terra
cotta
exterior,
and
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
it'll
show
some
of
the
interior
aspects
of
this
station.
O
This
shows
some
of
the
portuguese
tile
that
we're
working
on
we've
also
designated
some
space
for
public
art.
We
have
yet
to
identify
exactly
what
that
public
art
would
be,
but
you
can
see
that
there
are
several
notated
spaces
where
jessa
jessica
is
pointing
with
her
cursor
to
incorporate
public
art
into
the
station
next
slide.
Please.
O
This
is
the
downtown
san
jose
station
area.
This
station
there's
actually
two
components
to
the
downtown
station.
If
you
look
to
the
far
left,
this
is
the
main
station
head
house
in
the
purple
box.
It's
located
between
the
old
historical
building.
That's
now
the
spearmint
rhino,
I
think
that's
in
there
and
then
the
it'll
take
up
the
space
where
the
chase
bank
is.
We
also
have
some
planned
tod
in
that
area.
We've
worked
on
a
design
development
framework
for
the
area
that
comprises
that
tan
box.
O
The
red
outline
is
the
area
that
we'll
be
utilizing
for
all
of
our
construction
and
construction
staging
once
again,
the
green
area
is
our
platform.
The
platform
is
about
700
feet
long,
and
it
goes
the
struts
from
you
know,
just
a
little
bit
east
of
the
center
between
market
and
first
street,
all
the
way
over
to
second
street.
That
second
purple
box
is
where
we
have
a
secondary
head
house
that
provides
additional
access
and
also
some
more
egress
facilities.
O
O
This
is
the
conceptual
architectural
rendering
of
the
downtown
station.
You
are
looking
to
the
east
on
santa
clara
street
you're,
just
east
of
market
street,
looking
at
the
main
entrance,
and
you
can't
see
it,
but
there
are
plans
for
transit,
oriented
development,
atop
of
that
main
station
head
house
next
slide.
Please.
O
This
is
the
interior
of
the
downtown
primary
entrance
building.
As
you
can
see,
if
you
look
on
the
left,
there
will
be
a
combination
of
escalators,
stairs
and
elevators
for
the
vertical
circulation.
We
are
still
refining
some
of
that
exact
configuration
and
how
many
times
you'll
switch
back.
That
is
an
effort
actually
we're
just
beginning
to
commence
with
with
city
of
staff,
from
city
of
san
jose
and
with
spur
we're
going
to
be
going
through
sort
of
a
90-day
refinement
period.
O
As
we're
working
on
the
tunnel
and
track
work
contract,
we
will
be
working
with
the
cp2,
a
joint
venture
team.
Looking
at
some
innovations
and
what
ways
we
can
really
enhance
the
passenger
experience,
how
they
access
the
stations
and
both
get
around
in
the
stations
to
get
onto
the
train,
boarding
and
next
slide.
Please.
O
This
is
what
the
entrance
will
look
like
to
that
secondary
station.
It's
smaller,
but
we
anticipate
significant
use
of
that
also,
especially
for
those
accessing
the
station
from
the
east
parts,
both
coming
from
city
hall
and
san
jose
state.
It's
it's
a
little
more
than
a
block
closer
to
access
for
the
secondary
entrance
next
slide.
Please.
O
The
red
area
is
our
construction
staging
area
and
we
will
be
working
very
closely
with
all
of
our
partners
sap
as
we
prepare
this
area
and
maintain
circulation
and
access
to
and
through
this
area.
So
that
is
a
major
effort
and
I'll
go
a
little
bit
more
into
that
construction,
transportation
management
plan
and
the
collaboration
that
will
be
occurring
between
vta
city
of
san
jose
sap
and
the
google
west
project.
O
This
is
a
conceptual
rendering
of
the
entrance
to
the
deardon.
The
entrances
will
be
on
the
sides
of
cahill
and
montgomery
street,
so
it
won't
be
directly
in
the
front
when
we
looked
at
the
best
and
most
efficient
way
to
enter
enter
the
stations.
It
was
much
more
feasible
to
have
patrons
entering
from
the
east
and
the
west,
rather
than
directly
off
of
santa
clara
street
and
more
intuitively,
to
go
down
the
escalators
in
an
alignment.
O
That's
parallel
with
the
actual
platforms,
so
it
just
creates
a
little
more
seamless
access
to
the
boarding
of
the
trains.
But
this
is
looking
from
montgomery
street
to
the
diridon
station.
O
This
is
the
interior
of
the
diridon
station
and,
once
again
you
can
see
for
all
of
the
vertical
circulation.
That's
what
we
refer
to
as
going
up
and
down
the
combination
of
stairs
escalators
and
a
unique
aspect
of
this.
Is
we
worked
through
our
design
review
committees
on
some
of
the
aesthetic
treatments
of
this
and,
as
you
can
see,
in
the
background,
the
teal
was
definitely
a
preferred
color
in
those
choices
to
reflect
both
our
neighbors
across
the
street
sap
and
the
sharks.
O
O
These
are
just
some
general
overall
recent
project
activities
for
the
project
because
we're
applying
for
funding
through
the
federal
transit
administration.
O
We
work
very
closely
with
the
fta
and
we
work
with
what's
called
a
project
management
oversight
consultant,
and
we
have
monthly
meetings
with
the
fta
and
the
project
management
oversight
consultant.
We
actually
have
one
this
thursday
on
all
the
progress,
it's
sort
of
like
an
ongoing
audit
of
our
efforts
and
management
and
all
the
activities
and
alerting
them
of
meeting
deadlines
of
things
that
we've
committed
to
delivering
on
certain
dates
and
where
we
are
like.
O
I
report
monthly
on
where
we
are
with
our
community
outreach,
where
we
are
with
our
third
party
agreements,
reviews
by
the
city
of
our
plans
and
such
as
I
mentioned,
we
just
had
an
additional
200
million
allocated
to
the
project.
Out
of
the
president's
proposed
fiscal
2023
budget.
We
are
in
the
process
of
acquiring
real
estate.
O
We
are
doing
those
acquisitions
based
on
project
delivery,
so
much
of
the
acquisitions
are
going
from
the
west
to
the
east,
so
you
know
we
begin
in
santa
clara,
but
there
are
some
acquisitions
related
to
the
area
near
where
the
porter
will
be
for
the
tunnel
for
the
tunnel.
I'm
sorry
and
then
the
other
properties
majority
of
the
properties
are
tunnel
easements,
but
there
are
a
fair
amount
of
properties
related
to
the
station
areas.
O
We're
doing
our
ongoing
technical
coordination
with
all
our
partner
agencies,
like
I
said
as
part
of
those
review
periods,
we
advance
design,
we
conducted
stations,
workshops
with
spur
and
city
of
san
jose
and
we're
going
to
be
doing
a
series
of
meetings
and
workshops
over
the
next
90
days
to
refine
those
station
designs,
and
we
gave
a
project
update.
We
have
a
vta
bart
working
committee
of
four
members
of
the
bart
board
and
vta
that
meets
a
few
times
a
year.
O
Next
slide,
please
upcoming
project
activities
I
had
mentioned.
O
We
are
summarizing
trade-offs
for
design
options
for
the
downtown
san
jose
endeared
on
stations,
with
the
extents
of
within
the
constraints
of
the
currently
approved
project,
we're
looking
at
safety
connectivity,
access,
circulation,
tod
integration,
so
excited
about
that
process
coming
up,
we
have
initiated
were
in
the
process
of
figuring
out
the
scope
of
an
independent
peer
analysis,
comparing
both
of
the
projects
that
were
scoped
the
single
and
twin
board
that
were
environmentally
analyzed,
we're
comparing
the
single
more
project
to
the
twin
war
project
that
is
estimated
to
take
approximately
90
days.
O
We
are
still
continuing
with
the
currently
environmentally
cleared
single
bore
project,
but
are
conducting
this
peer
review
and
in
really
an
effort
to
just
reaffirm
that
the
direction
we're
going
is
the
right
direction,
but
as
we're
advancing
on
the
single
bore
project,
we're
also
looking
to
refining
that
to
deliver
the
best
single
door
project
possible.
O
Next
slide,
please
our
ctmp,
that
is
our
construction
transportation
management
plan.
This
is
a
very,
very
critical
document
and
what
we
did
in
the
cp2
package
and
the
other
contract
packages.
We
took
the
environmental
commitments
and
those
are
incorporated
into
it
were
draft
ctmps
and
it
gave
sort
of
the
the
rules
that
the
contractors
had
to
bid
by,
but
once
the
contractor
identifies
their
means
and
methods.
O
We
will
then
develop
contract
pacific
construction
transportation
management
plans,
so
we
will
be
going
out
to
we'll
go
through
our
cwgs,
we'll
hold
public
meetings,
we're
going
to
be
presenting
our
next
set
of
contract,
specific
plans
to
the
city
council
to
then
get
that
final
construction,
transportation
management
plan
and
working
with
all
of
our
partners
in
that
development.
O
So
right
now
what
we
have
and
what
we
required
of
the
contractors
where
sort
of
the
overarching
rules
of
engagement
and
then
we'll
get
into
the
fine
details
with
input
from
all
of
our
stakeholders,
both
the
public
and
our
city
partners
and
the
businesses
and
key
you
know,
and
google
and
everyone
else
that
we'll
be
working
with
as
we
develop
these
contract
specific
ctmps,
so
that
specific
ctmp
effort
will
start
later
this
year
as
the
as
the
stage
one
activities
on
the
tunnel
and
track
work,
get
more
refined
next
slide,
please.
O
So
this
is
the
process
I
had
mentioned
we're
going
to
have
regular
coordination
meetings
throughout
the
development
of
those
ctmps
working
off
of
the
draft
and
then
entering
in
with
the
specific
activities
things
might
be
once
we
know
how
they
plan
to
utilize
a
roadway
or
where
the
actual
activities
are.
Then
that's
what
we'll
say.
Well,
maybe
we
need
to
have
this
particular
lane
closure,
or
this
is
going
to
be
the
route
that
we
suggest
to
reduce
those
impacts,
so
this
whole
process
we
start
with
our
contractor
vta
and
city
coordination.
O
O
Would
you
prefer
having
one
lane
closed
for
this
amount
of
time
or
two
lanes
close,
and
I'm
just
giving
these
examples
not
saying
that's
exactly
what
it
will
be
or
have
this
two
lanes
closed
for
me
half
the
amount
of
time
right
and
then
once
we
get
the
input
on
those
trade-offs.
That's
when
we'll
present
our
draft
final
plan
for
approval
for
the
actual
construction
transportation
management
plan
next
slide.
Please.
O
We've
been,
it's
been
a
challenge,
as
you
all
know,
with
covid
to
really
do
outreach
and
personal
interactions
with
the
community,
but
we
are
trying
to
really
augment
what
we've
been
doing.
We
are
doing
a
presentation
for
the
san
jose
downtown
association
on
june
10th.
We
are
going
to
have
some
of
our
community
working
group
summer,
socials
we're
looking
in
july
between
the
19th
and
21st.
We
have
regular
lease
scheduled
cwgs
five
times
a
year.
We
are
planning
what
we're
calling
a
community
social
at
the
end
of
august.
O
We're
planning
on
doing
that
at
the
downtown
block.
To
really
let
let
the
community
know
where
we're
at
with
the
project.
We've
been
doing
some
website
postings
and
emailings,
but
we
really
want
the
community
to
be
able
to
come
out
and
really
see
these
renderings
understand
where
the
stations
are
going
to
be
and
really
let
the
community
know
like
we're.
Moving
forward
with
this
project
and
construction
is
just
around
the
corner.
O
We
have
some
other
tailored
group
presentations,
we've
created
a
project
hotline,
so
you
can
directly
call
the
project
hotline
and
right
now
we
just
issued,
I
think
jessica
got
her
postcard
in
the
middle
and
anyone
who
lives
fairly
close
within
a
half
a
mile
of
the
alignment
or
stations
we
are
starting
to
do
all
of
our
information
gathering
we're
getting
contact
information,
we're
also
getting
information
for
any
of
the
properties.
O
That
would
be
part
of
the
mitigation
and
monitoring
program
and
just
getting
our
database
so
that
we
can
really
ensure
that
we
do
a
good
job
of
keeping
everyone.
That's
going
to
be
involved
with
the
project
activities
informed
in
advance
of
anything
and
everything
going
on
related
to
the
project.
B
O
I
would
be
happy
to
we
have
worked
with,
and
I
just
recently
presented
to
the
bart
has
their
accessibility
task
force
and
vta
has
its
committee
for
transit,
accessibility
and
the
communications
external
affairs
team
have
worked
with
both
of
those
committees
and
done
presentations.
So
we
have
shared
the
basic
station
layouts
on
a
higher
level.
Just
letting
them
know
that
in
the
bart
facility
standards
that
we're
required
to
meet
we're
meeting
all
of
the
accessibility
requirements.
O
But
then,
as
we
engage
further
and
get
into
some
of
the
more
nuanced
designs,
we
also
like
on
phase
one.
We
do
an
accessibility
like
audit
and
review
and
they'll
do
like
analysis
of
the
plans
to
make
sure,
like
the
tvm's,
like
they're
they're,
they're,
easy
to
read
from
a
real
a
wheelchair
right
like
making
sure
that
the
the
doors
on
the
restrooms
or
the
white
wits,
I
mean
they
go
through
every
detail
and
they
do
an
audit
with
the
designs
to
ensure
that
they
meet
all
the
accessibility
requirements.
O
So
we
are
working
closely
with
both
of
those
groups,
both
at
vta
and
bart.
E
So
are
those
those
are
professional
organizations
you're
meeting
with
or
those
are.
C
O
Users,
those
are
actual
users,
so
so
vta
that
and
they
have
their
committee
for
transit
accessibility
and
it's
a
group
of
members
of
the
public,
okay
and
some
agency
representatives
that
work
with
the
disabled
community.
We
work
with
that
committee.
So
it's
a
volunteer
committee
and
the
same
thing
with
the
bart
committee
for
transit
accessibility
as
well:
they're,
they're
individuals
that
represent
the
disabled
community
and
they
provide
input
and
feedback.
E
Okay,
I
I'm
very
happy
to
hear
that
when
I
looked
at
the
renderings
it
it
appeared
that
it
was
very
easily
walkable,
but
it
you
from
the
pictures
that
you
showed
us.
It
was
very
difficult
to
see
that
any
consideration
was
given
to
those
who
had
mobility
issues,
but
so
I'm
glad
that's
why
I
asked
the
question
because
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
was
no
thank
you
we're
spending
billions
of
dollars
on
this
project.
E
E
During
that
time,
mobility
and
accessibility
will
be
limited.
So
how
will
we
be
or
how
will
you
be
reaching
out
to
the
community
to
make
sure
that
they
still
have
accessibility
during
the
construction
phases.
O
So
that's
what
so
part
of
the
environmental
process
and
clearance
and
analysis.
It
identifies
the
impacts
right
and
then
we
have
to
to
get
the
project
environmentally
cleared.
We
have
to
implement
mitigations
right
so
in
those
mitigations.
That's
what
guides
the
the
guiding
principles
that
we've
given
to
the
contractor
like
there
might
be
a
there
might
be
a
directive
like
you.
Can
you
have
to
maintain
so
many
lanes
of
through
traffic
or
you
have
to
maintain
a
12-foot
sidewalk
or
like
a
bike
path
like
at
the
diridon
station?
O
So
once
we
take
those
rules
like
I
said
all
of
those
commitments
and
the
mitigations,
then
we
take
that
and
that's
where
we
come
to
the
community
and
to
the
cities
and
our
partners
of
how
would
you
like
us
to
achieve
this
right
there
there's?
There
are
sometimes
several
ways
to
achieve
how
you
might
approach
that
mobility
and
that's
where
we
get
the
weigh-in
is
with
those
options.
How
would
you
like
us
to
proceed?
Which,
which
way,
do
you
prefer?
O
Do
you
prefer
us,
like,
I
said,
doing
these
two
lanes,
or
would
you
prefer
us
closing
this
lane,
or
do
you
prefer
us
to
do
a
detour
of
a
bike
path
over
here
or
do
you
prefer
it
over
here?
So
that
is
how
we
work
with
on
the
ctmp
and
then
provide
those
options
to
ensure
that
we're
mitigating
those
impacts.
E
Thank
you
so
as
you're
looking
at
the
ctmp
plan
and
looking
at
possibly
shutting
down
roads
and
or
moving
bike
lanes,
I
hope
you
will
consider
that
pedestrians
need
to
be
considered
in
a
much
bigger
way
than
our
automobiles,
because
this
is
really
about
creating
taking
people
out
of
their
automobiles
and
getting
into
mass
transit,
and
we
need
to
make
it
safe
and
accessible
to
them.
E
So
as
we're
squeezing
the
streets
as
construction
is
cons
is
occurring,
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
squeezing
our
bike
lanes
away
or
our
pedestrian
walkways,
so
that
people
can
like
and
bike
and
enroll,
as
you
said.
So.
Thank
you
for
your
response
to
that
and
to
your
presentation.
I'll,
look
forward
to
this.
As
we
move
along
charity,
you
need
a
motion
to
accept
the
report.
P
B
E
F
O
So
yes,
there'll,
be
there'll,
be
entrances
facing
both
cahill
street,
which
will
be
facing
the
future
intermodal
station
and
we're
working
with
our
partners
on
ensuring
that
there's
a
good
connection
right
now,
there's
a
street
plaza,
but
as
part
of
this
90-day
period,
we're
gonna
be
looking
at
possibilities.
O
How
we
might
augment
that
future
connection
over
to
the
intermodal
station,
which
will
be
to
the
west
and
then
the
east
entrance
is
everyone
coming
basically
from
further?
You
know
downtown
san
jose
area.
F
Right,
okay
and
then
I
saw
your
construction
impact
zones
in
red,
some
of
them
go
across
streets
or
in
fact
one
went
across
the
train
tracks.
I
s.
Do
those
necessarily
mean
that
roads
will
be
closed
during
construction
or
is
that
just
a
general.
O
Cahill
street
at
deeredon
will
be,
but
there
are
very
few
streets,
that's
going
to
be
closed
for
our
construction
and
just
the
general
construction
in
the
area,
but
there
are
very
few
streets
that
will
be
closed
as
part
of
the
project
construction.
So.
F
O
Just
the
edge
of
market
street,
it's
really
vta
purchased
the
the
vta
block
there
between
market
and
first
santa
clara-
and
I
think
it's
st
john
behind
so
we'll
have
the
whole
block,
but
we
won't
be
closing
off
the
streets.
There
might
be
some
work.
O
You
know
where
there
might
be
some
lane
closures
when
we're
doing
some
of
the
sidewalks
and
improvements,
but
we
will
be
not
closing
those
streets
and
important
to
note
that
we're
going
to
be
doing
everything
we
can
and-
and
one
of
the
primary
considerations
in
the
delivery
of
this
project
was
to
really
mitigate
the
street
level
impacts.
O
B
Thank
you.
I
want
to
thank
you
for
the
report
as
well,
and
I
just
want
to
highlight
one
thing.
You
said:
I'm
I'm
glad
that
you
are
taking
another
look
at
the
deardom
station
and
the
entrance
the
entrance
there
at
the
bart
station-
and
I
I
would
just
like
to
I
know.
I've
said
this
many
times
publicly
before
I
think
it's
really
important
for
that
entrance
to
be
integrated,
not
just
augmented
but
integrated
with
the
rest
of
duradon
station.
B
I
think
that's
a
really
important
piece.
We
can't
be
spending
billions
of
taxpayer
dollars
and
then,
frankly,
making
them
walk
across
a
plaza
like
I
just
it
just
doesn't
make
sense
when
we're
talking
about
a
duradon
integrated
station
concept.
So
I
I
know,
that's
not
all
on
you,
but
I
think
it's
really
important
to
know
every
angle
you
can
to
ensure
that
the
entrances
are
not
augmented,
but
the
entrances
are
integrated.
O
And
we
are,
I
think
you
know
we
are
conveying
all
of
this
to
the
cp2
contractor
and
looking
at
right
now,
as
I
said,
they're
looking
at
innovations
and
what
they
can
do,
we're
raising
certain
things
and
passenger
experience
has
definitely
been
raised
to
the
top
of
the
list.
So
it
will
be
a
period
of
exploration
on
what
they
can
do
to
maybe
achieve
some
of
these
requests
that
we
are
definitely
raising
raising
up
to
them.
B
Thank
you.
I
I
really
appreciate
that,
and
then
I
I
just
want
to
ask
about
I.
I
am
an
alternate
on
vta,
but
because
we
are
everything's
happening
on
zoom.
I
haven't
had
the
the
opportunity
to
sit
in
for
anybody
recently,
and
so
I'm
not
sure
how
the
the
peer
review
is
going
on
this
single
versus
twin
board,
independent
independent
study
and
I'm
wondering
if
the
economic
impact
of
the
of
the
twin
border
on
on
the
dow
on
downtown
san
jose
is
included
as
part
of
that
study.
O
Yeah
they're
trying
to
keep
the
study
very
separate
from
the
project,
so
it
has
every
appearance
of
being
independent,
but
I
know
that
all
everything,
financial
right,
the
impacts,
the
cost
of
delay
right
like
there.
There
were
some
assumptions
that
the
twin
bore
project
was
at
65
design
level
and
it
was
at
and
more
advanced
way
back
in
2008,
but
it
would
have
to
be
redesigned
so
just
to
go
to
do
anything
with
that
twin
board
project,
a
side
note
of
any
of
the
other
cost
related
to
it.
O
You're
you're,
talking
about
significant
delay,
which
talks
you
know,
which
equates
to
a
significant
amount
of
money.
So
all
of
that
will
be
analyzed.
You
know
like
starting
with
a
clean
slate
like
where
we
are
exactly
today
what
it
would
cost
to
deliver
that
what
the
impacts
would
be,
what
the
benefits
would
be,
what
the
detriments
would
be.
So
that
is
the
idea
in
that
comparison.
O
Yeah
I
can
I
I
can
check
for
sure
that
that
is
an
item.
That's
specifically
called
out
for
review.
I
I
think
that
they
will
analyze
impacts
so
that
could
be
equated.
I
don't
know
how
deep
down
they'll
dig
into
that,
but
they
would
definitely
have
to
analyze
environmental
impacts,
which
would
be
those
types
of
impacts
to
businesses
and
street
closures,
so
that
would
definitely
have
to
be
included,
because
those
are
that
was
a
significant
consideration.
In
the
initial
like,
I
stated
delivery
strategy.
B
Okay,
great,
thank
you
and
then
my
last
question
is
about
the
ctmp.
If
you
could
go
back
to
slide
19,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
the
process.
Sure.
O
J
K
C
B
The
the
sort
of
the
step
one,
I
think
we're
we're
on
sort
of
either
step
one
or
step
two,
but
it
sounded
like
we
were
still
on
step,
one
with
the
coordination
meetings
and
then
kind
of
drafting
a
contract,
specific
ctmp.
But
my
question
is:
there
are
some
major
players
in
the
downtown
area,
I
would
say
the
downtown
association,
google,
as
well
as
shark
sports
and
entertainment
and
and
having
them
be
in
the
stakeholder
engagement
after
a
draft
is
already
completed.
B
Seems
like
we'd
have
to
go
through
too
many
iterations.
It
seems
like
it
makes
more
sense
to
bring
them
in
earlier
in
the
process.
So
I'm
I'm
a
little
bit.
I
guess
I
want
to
know
a
little
bit
more
about
where
we
are
in
the
process
and
where
we
bring
in
our
our
major
players,
who
have
a
very
large
stake
in
that.
O
Yeah-
and
I
I
didn't
mention,
but
we're
in
ongoing
meetings
with
both
the
sharks,
sap
and
with
google,
so
those
meetings
and
coordination
have
been
incurring
all
along
and
we've
been
getting
input
and
feedback.
O
So
once
we
get
like,
I
stated
that
we
we
laid
sort
of
the
requirements
right
based
on
what
we
can
do
environmentally
to
the
contractor
and
then
once
they
identify
how
they
plan
to
deliver
this
project,
like
we
couldn't
put
out
anything
too
soon,
because
we
don't
know
exactly
their
means
and
methods
right
what
the
contractor
will
do
so
once
we
have
those
means
and
methods,
and
we
can
start
looking
at
how
we
will
implement
a
construction
transportation
management
plan.
That's
when
we'll
reach
back
out
to
all
the
stakeholders
and
get
their
input.
O
O
Says
the
things
you
can't
do
in
a
sense
right,
like
you
have
to
adhere
to
this
rule.
You
can't
do
this,
so
they
could
bid
on
something
knowing
all
their
constraints.
That
was
really
the
purpose
to
have
the
ctmp
in
the
contract
bid
documents
because
they
had
to
understand
that
there
were
going
to
be
constraints
which
is
associated
with
some
cost
to
them
right.
So
that's
what
we
had
to
give
them
for
the
bidding
process
and
then
once
they
bid
on
that
and
know
those
constraints
that
they
have
to
work
with.
B
So,
for
example,
with
one
of
those
constraints,
not
not
closing
lanes
during
you
know
five
to
seven
pm
on
on
on
event
days,
or
I
mean
was
that
in
there
I
mean.
O
We've
had
those
discussions
I
mean
overall,
it
was
like
what
lanes
you
absolutely
can't
close
at
all,
and
then
that
will
be
something
that
we
work
on
like
we.
We
have
talked
about
the
exact
hours
of
when
we
wouldn't
have
anything
closed
and
when
we
would
not
be
doing
even
construction
activities
right
I
mean
it
goes
beyond
just
laying
it's
like
what
are
the
hours
of
construction.
We
can
do
so
that
it's
not
interrupt
so.
O
They
knew
that
there
would
be
constraints,
they
didn't
know
exactly
what
what
the
times
would
be
right.
We
said
that
there
would
be
hours
that
they,
they
couldn't
work
every
day,
nine
to
five,
that
there
would
be
times
when
they
had
to
work
around
other
schedules.
So
those
are
the
types
of
things
that
were
included
in
their
bid
documents.
O
K
Well,
I
think
bernie
said
it
well,
I
think
just
to
be
very
clear.
There
was
not
something
like
you
know
on
game
days.
K
You
have
to
be
done
two
to
three
hours
ahead
of
time,
and
that
has
certainly
been
something
that
we've
talked
to
the
vta
team
and
shark
sports
and
entertainment
about
that
desire,
and
what
bernice
shared
about
the
contractor
coming
on
board
right,
just
was
enacted
at
vta.
Very
recently,
documents
are
being
signed
this
these
innovations
right.
We
don't
yet
understand
the
full
scope
of
those
innovations.
K
Once
we
have
started
to
unpack
those
types
of
things
like
the
means
and
methods
of
construction,
with
the
changes
potentially
in
the
tunnel
or
the
construction
staging
area,
all
those
things
that
bernice
went
through.
That's
when
we
can
say
what
would
the
impact
be
of
a
two
to
three
hour
moratorium
before
games
or
what
would
the
impact
be
if
this
that
and
the
other,
but
without
in
in
isolation?
G
B
Q
Last
november
was
to
to
expedite
that
you
know,
given
the
the
change
in
the
global
climate
and
our
increased
heat
days,
increase,
storms
et
cetera,
and
you
know
san
jose's
desire
to
do
our
part
and
to
lead
rather
than
follow,
and
so
you,
you
unanimously
approved
us
moving
towards
carbon
neutrality
and
then
you
know
rightfully
said
hey.
Why
don't
you
come
back
and
tell
us
how
we're
going
to
do
that?
Q
If
you
look
and
that's
what
we're
here
to
do
today,
if
you
look
at
the
chart
on
this
slide,
you
can
see
that
our
community
and
greenhouse
gas
inventories
are
trending
in
the
right
direction.
So
we're
trending
down,
but
we're
not
trending
down
fast
enough
at
our
current
on
our
current
trajectory
to
meet
carbon
neutrality
by
by
2030..
Q
So,
but
you
know,
with
the
carbon
pathway,
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
to
stay
true
to
our
good
life,
2.0
mantra
and
and
sort
of
touchstone
in
climate,
smart,
san
jose.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
both
improving
the
environment
and
improving
the
lives
and
lifestyles
of
our
community
along
the
way.
So
they
should
be
moving
together.
Q
And
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide-
and
we
thought
one
of
the
best
ways
to
to
communicate
and
to
really
ensure
that
there
was
clarity
on
how
we
were
going
to
do.
This
was
to
establish
a
vision.
So
our
vision
is
that
san
jose
will
become
a
better,
stronger
and
more
resilient
community
by
accelerating
our
climate
action
and
moving
towards
carbon
neutrality
by
2030
and
we'll
do
that
by
engaging
our
community
through
the
planning
process
and
making
all
of
the
voices
heard.
Q
So
with
that,
you
know
what
we're
bringing
forward
today
is
a
framework
and
a
strategy
of
how
we're
how
we're
going
to
move
in
concert
with
our
community
to
get
to
the
finer
details
of
of
the
particular
plan.
So
so
we
recognize
that
we
need
to
do
more
engagement
and
that
this
document
is
kind
of
a
living
document.
Q
And
you
know
through
this
process,
we
heard,
as
I'm
sure
many
council
members
did
from
our
community,
whether
it
was
through
building
electrification
or
changing
our
transportation
approaches
that
they
wanted
all
of
their
voices
to
be
heard.
And
so
we
want
to
ensure
that
we're
hitting
all
of
the
community
and
really
that
all
of
our
community
sees
themselves
and
their
family
somewhere
in
in
the
document.
Q
And
so
so
we
know
that
more
work
needs
to
be
done,
but
we
strongly
believe
if
we
move
forward
on
the
path
that
we're
bringing
forward
today
we're
going
to
bring
the
community
along
with
us,
we're
going
to
learn
together,
we're
going
to
move
together
and
we're
going
to
hit
these
objectives
by
2030,
and
but
it's
gonna.
It's
gonna
take
a
lot
of
work
next
life.
Q
So
you
know,
85
of
our
community-wide
emissions
are
from
two
areas
from
transportations
and
and
buildings,
and
so
those
those
are
the
two
biggest
buckets
for
us
to
focus
on.
Q
There
certainly
are
smaller
buckets
like
solid
waste
or
some
fugitive
emissions,
but
we're
really
not
focused
on
those
we're
focused
on
kind
of
getting
the
biggest
bang
for
our
buck,
but
also
being
able
to
to
work
with
our
community
on
fewer
tasks
so
that
we
can
have
a
bigger
impact
and
that
and
we're
not
sort
of
confusing
the
public
with
too
many
varieties
of
how
to
get
to
carbon
neutrality.
Q
So
bigger
buckets
with
lots
of
options
inside
of
them,
and
so,
with
that
I'll
hand
it
over
to
julie,
to
talk
more
specifically
about
about
our
strategies,
but
really
want
you
to
hear
our
thoughts
and
ideas
in
the
spirit
of
we're
doing
this
in
partnership
with
the
community
and
that
san
jose
will
be
a
better
place
for
for
having
moved
along
this
path
together.
J
Thank
you
carrie.
So,
from
the
three
focus
areas
that
kerry
had
mentioned,
city
staff
had
identified
four
acceleration
strategies
that
are
listed
on
this
slide.
These
are
not
new
to
us.
These
are
our
climate,
smart
strategies,
but
these
are
the
areas
where
we
do
need
to
focus
in
order
to
to
make
a
quicker
acceleration.
J
So
those
are
to
move
to
zero
emission
vehicles
reduce
the
miles
we
travel
in
our
vehicles
by
at
least
20
percent
switch
our
appliances
from
fossil
fuel
to
electric
and
power,
our
community
with
100,
carbon,
neutral
electricity,
and
so
yes,
these
are
the
areas
that
we
would
need
to
focus
on
in
order
to
accelerate.
L
L
The
first
is
moving
to
zero
emission
vehicles,
we're
seeing
a
lot
of
movement
in
the
market,
a
lot
of
movement
within
mobility
to
move
to
get
folks
in
electric
vehicles,
and
it's
also
the
shortest
the
fastest
way
to
reduce
emissions
right,
is
to
change
the
fleet
of
vehicles
versus
changing
the
overall
design
of
the
transportation
system.
L
L
L
This
means
we
need
significantly
to
accelerate
the
pace
of
electric
vehicle
adoption,
as
well
as
the
build
out
of
electric
vehicle
infrastructure.
Currently
we
have,
where
is
the
stat
there
we
have
about
so
sorry,
she
knows
up
to
my
head
and
we
have
about.
L
1800
ev
chargers
within
the
city
to
get
to
us
being
able
to
support
all
of
these
vehicles.
We
would
need
over
62
000
chargers
to
make
this
work.
L
It's
a
lot
of
work
ahead
of
us,
but
we
believe
that
this
is
the
most
viable
way
to
drive
our
ev
adoption
and
emissions
reductions
and,
as
was
brought
up
earlier
by
council
member
cohen
other
pieces
that
we're
looking
at
are
education
programs,
as
well
as
policies
to
help
us
drive
more
adoption
and
better
spread
of
ev
adoption
and
electric
vehicle
infrastructure.
Next
slide,
please
well
much
of
the
emissions
from
the
transportation
sector
would
be
driven
by
adoption
of
electric
vehicles.
L
We
still
want
to
keep
on
pace
with
our
goal
of
reducing
vehicle
mode's
travel
by
20
by
2030,
and
we
really
know
that
this
is
how
do
you
say
this
takes
longer,
but
pays
huge
dividends,
as
we
just
learned
about
from
the
bart
project
takes
a
long
time
to
get
some
of
these
big
infrastructure
pieces
through,
but
once
they're
in
they
recreate
the
bones
of
our
city
and
become
part
of
our
bigger
pathway.
L
J
Thank
you
so
for
the
electrification
of
existing
building
strategy,
the
acceleration
strategy,
the
data
shows
us
that
our
primary
focus
should
be
on
electrifying
space
and
water,
heating
equipment
and
residential
buildings,
and
that's
because
those
two
appliances
make
up
ninety
percent
of
their
residential
emissions
from
natural
gas.
J
So
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
really
focus
on
those
two
appliances.
There
are
also
a
lot
of
existing
programs
and
incentives
that
can
help
support
building
energy
efficiency
and
electrification
and
well.
We
still
need
to
do
more
to
provide
further
assistance
to
low-income
communities.
J
J
And
finally,
we
thought
it
was
very
important
to
lead
by
example,
as
we
work
towards
carbon
neutrality.
J
If
we
want
to
progress
significantly
significantly
on
our
carbon
neutrality
goals
within
the
municipal
buildings,
the
airport
is
a
significant
portion
of
emissions
and
of
that
portion
from
the
airport,
nearly
all
of
their
natural
gas
emissions
come
from
their
central
utility
plant
usage
and
that
plant
is
nearing
a
an
end
of
life
within
the
next
couple
years.
So
the
city's.
J
So
it's
a
good
place
to
focus
in
terms
of
making
it
a
significant
step
there
and
the
city's
buildings
are
also
able
to
move
to
100
renewable
electricity
quickly
through
san
jose
clean
energy
service
option,
and
so
we
have
identified
also
supporting
actions
within
the
municipal
sector
that
addresses
some
of
these
data
pieces
that
we,
the
data
takeaways
that
we've
seen,
and
so
those
include
working
further
towards
all
electric
existing
buildings
for
municipal
buildings,
addressing
employee,
employee
commutes
through
transportation
demand
management
programs
and
the
city's
fleet,
and
also
moving
to
carbon
neutral.
J
So
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
there's
a
definitely
an
understanding
of
the
scale
of
the
effort
that
is
required
to
meet
our
carbon
neutrality
goals,
as
we
mentioned
a
little
bit
in
the
through
this
presentation,
but
for
the
90
ev
goal
that
is
reaching
85,
I
mean
83
000
passenger
evs
per
year
and
also
7.5
or
7
500
public
ev
charters
per
year
in
order
to
accommodate
and
address
to
support
those
evs
in
our
community
on
the
bnt
goal.
J
This
is
based
on
population
and
job
growth,
assumptions
and
climates
in
the
climate,
smart
model
and
the
the
20
bmt
goal.
Well,
it
requires
two
percent
reduction
in
vmt
per
service
population
per
year
in
order
to
reach
the
20
total
by
the
2030
year
goal,
and
that
is
actually
in
line
with
how
we
have
been
progressing
pre-covered
in
terms
of
our
reductions.
J
But
we
also
know
that,
as
ramses
mentioned,
vmt
requires
time
and
it
requires
a
lot
of
infrastructure
and
so
making
changes
in
how
people
travel,
you
know
is
really
is
still
quite
a
big
lift
in
order
to
meet
those
goals
and
then
on
the
carbon
neutral.
New
carbon
neutral
power
goal
of
100,
we
know
that
it
would
require
650,
approximately
650
megawatts
of
renewables,
as
well
as
around
300
megawatts
of
storage
and
200
megawatts
of
hybrid
and
or
green
gas.
J
To
be
able
to
emit
these
carbon
neutral
goals
by
the
2030
date
on
the
building
side
for
100
building
electrified
buildings.
That
would
be
approximately
43
000
homes
per
year
that
go
all
electric
as
well
as
9.7
million
square
feet
of
commercial
space.
So
quite
significant
jumps
in
all
of
these
areas,
which
is
what
we'll
be
working
towards.
J
And
we
know
that
we
also
have
a
lot
of
supporting
resources.
You
know
both
that
we
can
build
upon
some
that
are
existing
and
also
that
there's
a
lot
of
unprecedent
unprecedented
funding,
support
that
we
know
is
coming
down
and
has
been
coming
down
which
we'll
be
seeking
out
and
that
can
help
us
propel
the
community
forward.
J
So
again,
those
include
existing
programs
and
incentives
that
are
already
there
that
we
can
leverage
to
be
able
to
support
our
community
as
well
as
developing
new
public
and
private
partnerships.
For
example,
we
recently
released
an
rfp
for
an
electrification
upgrade
accelerator
implementer,
so
that
will
help
us
move
forward
with
with
further
electrification
and
supporting
our
community
in
a
more
streamlined
manner.
J
Q
Sorry
apparently,
ups
showed
up
and
my
dog
wanted
to
greet
them,
so
so
yeah.
So
you
know
our
next
step
is
to
really
again
refine
the
strategies
figure
out
where
we're
going
to
get
external
funding
and
partnerships-
and
you
know,
are
things
we've
been
hearing
in
the
market.
True
or
not,
but
you
know
we're
committed
to
moving
this
forward
and
you
know
whether
we
get
there
by
2030
or
2035.
Q
We
really
think
we
can
get
there
and
and-
and
we
think
it's
going
to
result
again
in
a
better
in
a
better
community
and
certainly
a
better
environment,
and
with
that
and
the
teams
available
for
questions.
B
A
F
My
name
is
daschle
leeds,
I'm
the
conservation
organizer
for
the
sierra
club,
loma
prieta
chapter
we're
in
strong
support
of
the
climate,
smart
update
and.
J
N
Hi
yeah,
I
just
as
a
like
a
middle
class
member
of
the
community
of
san
jose.
I'm
just
wondering
like
at
what
expense
is
this
plan
to
us,
like
the
the
current
administration
like
of
the
country?
Right
now
is
already
like
trying
to
make
eliminate
fracking
and
fossil
fuels,
and
it's
been
catastrophic
to
us.
It's
not
even
like
proven
to
do
anything
like
good
to
help
us
save
any
money
in
any
way.
So
I'm
just
wondering
how
much
does
this
like
how
much
okay
so
like?
N
Let
me
try
to
like
get
my
words
correct,
so
I
don't
just
like
word
vomit,
I'm
just
wondering
is
100
electricity
even
safe?
What
about
blackouts?
What
about
when
we
build
these
windmills?
What
about
all
the
wildlife
that
we're
going
to
affect,
like
that's,
that
uses,
uses
these
trees
for
shelters
because
we
have
to
build
somewhere
right?
So
what
about
the
birds
that
die
from
these
windmills?
N
Is
that
is
that
really
going
to
be
helping
the
planet
and
I'm
just
wondering
where
I'm
going
to
get
the
money
for
an
electric
car,
because
I
can't
even
afford
one.
So
I
mean
I'm
not
against
climate.
I
mean
saving
the
climate
or
whatever,
but
like
at
what
expense
is
this
going
to
be
to
us
that
can't
afford
this
type
of
stuff?
That's
all.
I
have.
A
D
Borders
hi,
thank
you.
This
is
jill
borders
and
I'm
I'm
really
happy
to
hear
about
this
plan.
I
I
hear
the
caller
before
me
and
I
I
echo
some
of
his
concerns,
but
I
also
am
really
excited
about
the
possibility.
So
thank
you
for
all
the
work
in
the
environmental
services
department.
I
really
feel
like
they
do
justice
to
the
to
the
idea
that
we
can
do
it.
You
know
we
just
have
to
push
ourselves
and
having
said
that,
one
thing
that
I
is
is
heavy
on
my
mind.
D
You
know
a
4
400
square
foot
home
to
be
built
on
a
beautiful,
open
space
right
now,
where
it's
a
critical
wildlife
linkage,
passage,
area
and
they're
advocating
or
excuse
me,
the
home,
will
is
outside
of
the
urban
growth
boundary,
and
it
will
need
a
propane
tank
on
the
hill.
It's
going
to
have
a
four
car
garage.
It's
going
to
need
a
1400,
long
driveway
to
get
to
santa
teresa
and
for
me
for
the
planning
staff
to
go
ahead
and
say
yeah.
You
know
this
is
going
to
be
okay,
we're
recommending
this.
O
A
A
A
K
O
D
Hi
this
is
desiree.
Graham,
thank
you
for
letting
me
speak.
I
appreciate
all
of
your
hard
work
and
I
wholeheartedly
support
the
climate.
Smart
update
and
I
hope
you
vote
to
present
this
to
council.
Thank.
K
Q
You
know
bringing
the
whole
community
in
on
this
plan
and
ensuring
that
rebates
and
incentives
are
in
place
for
the
community.
So
thank
you
for
hearing
me
out.
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
cohen,.
F
Yeah,
thank
you
and
thank
you
to
the
entire
team
for
the
work
to
bring
this
forward
and
the
details
and
the
reports
that
were
attached.
It's
it's.
It's
impressive
work
and
I'm
excited
to
see
us
get
moving
on
it.
F
I
I
have
a
lot
more
to
say
next
week,
but
I
just
wanted
to
say
a
few
things
asked
a
few
questions
this
week.
First
of
all,
on
the
far
is
the
electrification.
I
know
there's
been
some
concerns
in
the
public
about
this
question
of
forced
transition.
F
It's
important
for
us
to
be
using
to
be
describing
this
correctly
we're
as
a
city.
Our
role
is
to
facilitate
the
transition,
that's
inevitable
and
that's
happening
anyway,
and
I
think
we
ought
to
be
making
sure
that
the
language
and
the
report
reflects
that,
and
I
think
it
does
that
now
the
state
and
the
bay
area,
air
quality
management
district
are
going
to
are
going
to
require
that
new
appliances
are
electric
by
2029
and
2030..
F
So
our
role
as
a
city
is
to
make
sure
people
have
the
training
and
resources
and
preparation
so
that
when
that
happens,
and
their
appliances
fail,
they'll
be
ready
for
that
transition
and
that
we
help
direct
them
towards
the
right
grants
and
resources
and
incentives
to
do
that.
So
that's
my
comment
on
slide.
11.
F
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
put
that
up
or
not,
but
I
I'm
it's
an
impressive
number
once
you
actually
see
the
scale
of
the
effort
that
we
need
and
while
I'm
excited
about
getting
there,
I
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
challenges
to
get
there.
I'm
I'm
excited
if
happy
to
hear
your
optimism
that
we
can
do
this.
I
think
the
top
right
bottom
left,
I
think,
we're
on
on
target
for
those
the
the
ones
on
the
top
left
and
bottom
right
are
a
little
bit
harder.
F
I
want
to
ask
about
the
one
on
the
top
right.
The
the
90
ev
target
means
that
90
of
new
vehicle
purchases
would
be
evs.
Is
that
correct.
F
Registered
vehicles
do
we
think
there's
enough
turnover,
I
mean
we
don't
want
people
necessarily
retiring,
a
car,
that's
useful
right.
We
want,
we
want
it
to
be
done
at
as
people
are
buying
new
vehicles.
I
assume
so.
Are
we
expecting
that
90
turnover
to
get
us
to
be
able
to
get
us
to
that
point
by
playing
so.
Q
Councilmember,
some
of
this
is
just
sort
of
how
how
we
get
to
targets
and
we're
certainly
registered
vehicles
is
a
bit
of
broad
topic
right:
we're
not
asking
people
to
give
away
their
classic
cars
that
they
they
they
appreciate,
or
certainly
not
to
not
register
them.
Q
It's
it's
really
telling
us
that
90
of
the
vehicles
on
the
road
that
are
driven
most
often
and
need
to
be
need
to
be
evs
based
on
what
we
know
today,
and
so,
as
you,
you
know,
as
you've
brought
up
in
the
past
by
2035,
the
state's
already
saying
vehicles
sold
need
to
be
electric,
so
our
task
is
to
to
ensure
there's
adequate
charging
and
to
facilitate
people
making
that
choice
when
they
buy
a
car,
but
the
similar
to
how
we're
approaching
building
electrification
we're
not
going
to
come
confiscate
somebody's
car
or
tell
them
they
can't
drive
it
in
san
jose.
Q
That's
that's!
Not
the
path
we're
going
on
we're
saying
when
you
need
to
make
a
change.
We'd
like
you
to
to
choose
electric,
and
certainly
people
don't
buy
cars
necessarily
always
when
their
car
is
worn
out
and
and
so
you
know,
how
do
we
make
it
more
interesting
and
easy
for
them
and.
F
Q
P
Sure,
no,
it's
a
really
good
question
and
important
to
understand
that
there's.
So
many
more
options
today
than
you
know,
may
have
been
in
years
past,
and
so
we
put
together
some
information
on
our
website
happy
to
share
it
with
you,
council,
member,
but
they're
using
evs.
You
know
after
incentives
could
be
as
low
as
you
know,
five
to
seven
thousand,
which
doesn't
mean
that's
still
not
challenging
for
a
lot
of
people.
P
So
another
effort
we're
really
working
on
is
connecting
residents
for
with
financing,
particularly
targeted
at
low-income
applicants
that
that
might
be
interested
in
those
types
of
vehicles.
F
And
people
have
a
misperception
that
evs
means
some
kind
of
you
know
luxury
new
vehicle
when
that's
not
the
case
and
actually,
as
you
said
by
by
2025,
it
won't
be
that
hard
to
find
them,
but
they'll
be
most
most
companies
will
have
almost
all
of
their
fleet
if
they're,
making
the
electric
vehicles
by
then
so
they'll
be
much
more
prevalent.
F
I
guess
my
point
on
this
issue
is
just
to
be
clear
that
we're
not
suggesting
that
we're
asking
people
to
retire
their
vehicles,
but
we're
we
should
have
a
target
of
what
of
of
whether
it's
100
or
some
or
90
above
90,
of
all
new
vehicles
purchased
by
san
jose
residents
or
you
know,
should
be
evs
by
that
date.
That's
going
to
help
us
get
to
that
goal.
So
I'm
on
the
charger
question
I
think
I
heard
ramsey
say
we
have
1800
chargers
in
the
city
right
now,
publicly.
F
So
I
just
kind
of
struck
by
the
idea
that
we
have
to
put
in
7
500
per
year
when
our
total
is
1800.
So
I
I
look
forward
to
seeing
the
the
plans
for
that
coming
forward
and
how
we're
going
to
achieve
that
goal.
I
know
it's
needed,
but
we're
just
gonna
have
to.
Q
Council
member,
I
think
you've
heard
me
say
this
before
I
have
to
do
an
inventory
of
how
many
gas
pumps
we
have,
because
that's
really
the
trade
out
we're
looking
at
right,
replacing
gas,
dispensing
pumps
with
with
an
ev
charger
and
so
looking
at
the
the.
How
realistic
that
could
could
be.
F
Yeah,
that's
interesting.
Thank
you
on
the
building
electrified
question.
Obviously
that's
also
a
big
number
we'll
have
a
lot
more
to
talk
about
on
that
next
week.
I'll
move
on
from
that,
except
to
say
that
I
saw
in
the
report
something
not
just
about
the
electrification
of
appliances,
but
some
element
about
building
retrofitting
of
existing
buildings.
Q
P
Yeah,
you
know,
I
would
say:
that's
always.
The
first
place
to
start
is
to
really
make
sure
things
are
efficient
and
then
again
you
know.
So
we
have
a
many
programs
focused
on
that,
as
has
esd
over
the
years.
So
I
think
that's
still
going
to
be
very
important,
but
again,
as
appliances
are
being
switched
out
and
as
particularly
heating
and
water
heaters
get
to
the
end
of
their
useful
life,
it's
really
important
that
we
make
the
switch
to
being
having
those
appliances
being
electric.
F
Right
having
to
be
electric
but
also
making
sure
that
we're
using
the
energy
in
the
most
efficient
way
possible
right,
so
there
were
two
elements
in
there
that
I
think
I
saw
that
there
was
some
question
about
direction
from
council
about
whether
to
continue
pursuing
one
is
the
question
about
roof
space
design
and
the
other
is
carbon
cost
of
construction?
F
Q
And
you
know
we
we're
looking
at
moving
the
biggest
buckets
forward
and
then
you
know
we're
trying
to
say
in
the
memos
we're
still
exploring
some
of
some
of
the
other
things
that
that
would
require
effort.
But
we
don't
want
to
dilute
our
efforts
either.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
moving
in
the
right
direction
and
but,
as
you
know,
ramza
said
in
terms
of
electrifying
the
vehicle's
fleet,
we
don't
want
to
miss
out
on
switching
people
to
biking
either.
Q
J
I
was
just
going
to
mention
that
in
the
plan
itself,
so
in
the
supporting
actions,
we
do
actually
say
that,
as
kerry
mentioned,
we'll
be
exploring
those
further
as
part
of
the,
I
think,
the
reach
code,
as
well
as
the
policy
evaluation
that
council
already
provided
direction
on,
so
those
can
be
exploited.
We
didn't
we
don't
we
didn't
list
it
as
a
priority.
J
G
And
the
only
yes-
and
I
would
ask
this-
is
kid
partner
obesity
manager
is
that
we
are
also
kind
of
load
balancing
within
the
context
of
your
direction
around
resilience
overall,
and
so
what
part
of
what
we
have
the
opportunity
to
do
now
is.
Is
you
know
what
what
are
those
those
biggest
biggest
least
effort
biggest
impact
around
reducing
our
carbon
footprint
and
fighting
climate
directly?
G
And
what
are
those
least
effort
biggest
impact
in
terms
of
dealing
with
the
fact
there
is
going
to
be
climate
change
at
this
point,
no
matter
how
how
efficient
and
effective
we
are
as
an
individual
city,
and
so
we
have
to.
We
have
to
balance
load
balance
between
those
two
and
and
make
sure
that
the
team
is
is,
is
split
between
them.
G
So
part
of
the
work
that
we'll
be
doing
within
the
overall
priority
is
the
prioritization
that
julie
and
kerry
were
talking
about,
and
how
does
that
fit
into
our
water
infrastructure,
our
energy
infrastructure,
as
it
is
in
terms
of
resilience
as
well,
so
you'll
see
a
lot
on
of
this
conversation.
I
think
over
the
next
year
or
so
and
and
coming
trying
to
come
back
to
you
and
including
using
this
committee
as
a
sounding
board
for
some
of
the
deeper
policy
conversations.
F
We'll
wait
for
some
of
the
larger
global
efforts
on
carbon
sequestration
and
actually
carbon
reduction,
so
that
eventually
we
can
dig
ourselves
out
before
we're
in,
but
that
won't
necessarily
be
a
san
jose
effort.
I
learned
last
week
that
just
a
half
a
degree
increase
in
temperature
is
kill.
Will
you
know
completely
change
the
character,
if
not
kill
a
lot
of
the
coral
reefs
in
the.
F
Regions-
and
so
these
are,
these-
are
major
major
issues
for
our
entire
planet
on
the
carbon
cost
of
construction.
I
just,
I
just
think,
that's
exciting
to
think
about,
and
obviously
you
know
I
I've
seen
in
in
cities
this
this.
It's
not
just
about
the
cost
of
construction,
but
about
reuse
and
not
necessarily
and
preservation
of
what
exists
and
building
on
top,
rather
than
necessarily
tearing
down
a
building
from
scratch.
F
I've
seen
great
examples
of
buildings,
modern
buildings
built
on
the
top
of
a
structure
of
an
old.
You
know
century
old
base
without
having
to
tear
down
completely
and
start
over,
and
so
I
a
lot
of
these
things
I
think
are
going
to.
I
think
you
would
you
know
this.
You
plan
this
too,
are
going
to
deal
with
how
we
bring
forward
suggestions
for
changing
our
planning
codes
so
that
in
the
future
we're
we
have
requirements
for
how
construction
will
occur.
Q
You
know
this:
we
got
to
this
point
by
working
collaboratively
with
almost
every
department
in
the
city
and
in
terms
of
how
how
we're
working
on
future
reach
code
we
work,
really
kind
of
in
sync,
with
pbce
on
that
we
haven't
broached
this
particular
point
with
pbce,
but
as
one
of
the
callers
said,
we
do
need
to
look
across
the
organization
and
sync
up
our
policies
to
make
sure
that
and
that
we
are
looking
at
the
broader
picture
in
everything
that
we
do,
and
so
we
have
more
work
to
do
in
that
in
that
area.
Q
But
but
it
is
our
intent
that
that
every
part
of
the
organization,
as
they're
making
decisions
we'd
be
thinking.
What
is
the
carbon
impact
of
that,
and
can
we
do
better,
not
just
thinking?
Oh,
we
always
knock
down
the
building
and
then
build
something
as
an
example.
Thank.
F
You
and
I
hope
that
that
in
10
years
that
ups
drug
that
came
to
your
house
will
be
electric
yeah
all
right.
I
want
to
move
the
report
and
move
it
so
that
we
can
consider
the
council
next
week.
E
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
report.
It's
very
exciting
to
see
this
come
forward.
I
just
have
a
comment
actually
and
it
first.
I
I
commend
you
on
the
vision
statement
that
you
have,
but
I'd
like
to
change.
One
word
or
have
you
consider
changing
one
word
and
that
is:
can
you
pull
up
the
vision
statement,
so
we
can
all
take
a
look
at
it.
Q
E
E
To
me,
a
vision
statement
should
be
much
stronger
than
that,
and
instead
of
moving
I'd
like
to
replace
that
with
achieving,
because
if
we
just
continually
attempt
to
move
we're,
actually
not
saying
we're
going
to
achieve
it,
and
our
the
motion
that
we
made
last
year
was
that
we're
going
to
achieve
carbon
neutrality
now,
that
may
be
impossible
or
it
may
be
very
difficult,
but
if
we
throw
it
out
there
as
our
vision
statement,
it
shows
we
are
serious
about
this.
If
we
change
the
word
from.
Thank
you
from
moving
to
achieving.
E
So
if
the,
if
the
maker
of
the
motion
would
allow
I'd
like
to
change
that
to
to
a
friendly
amendment
to
change
the
word
achieving
and
whoever
just
made
that
change.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that,
but
I
also
appreciate
that
you
came
up
with
a
vision
statement
as
your
guiding
principle.
I
think
that's
really
important
and
will
help
focus
the
work.
This
is
really
really
important
work
that
we
must
achieve
if
we
don't
achieve
it,
we're
in
crisis
mode
for
our
children
and
our
children's
children
and
the
and
the
life
of
this
planet.
So
we
have
to
make
it
and
we
and
it's
going
to
be
painful
to
get
there.
E
The
one
area
of
concern
to
me
well,
there's
a
lot
of
areas
of
concern,
but
and
council
member
cohen
mentioned
it
several
times
about
the
ev
chargers.
I
I
so
so
I
just
want
to
drill
down
on
this
number
a
little
bit
more.
We
have
1800
publicly
available
eevee
chargers
that
rams
us,
that's
what
okay.
We
need
62
000
publicly
available
or
total.
So
what
is
the
excessive?
What's
the
availability
of
all
the
ev
charges
at
our
businesses
at
our
schools
at
other
places
that
have
chargers?
E
Do
we
have
that
number
and
how
I
know
it's
not
62
000,
but
it's
also
not
1800.
So
how
much
closer
are
we
do?
We
have,
I
think
that
number
would
be
really
helpful
to
know
next
week,
because
it's
not
just
what
we
can
do
to
install
ev
chargers,
it's
what
our
community
can
do
to
install
ev
charges
and
encouraging.
I
know
I
see
school
districts
with
ev
chargers.
E
I
see
businesses
installing
them
and
it's
all
because
it's
good
for
their
businesses
for
their
employees
and
their
customers
to
have
access
to
that
that
ex
that
capabilities,
I'm
more
concerned
about
access
for
eevee
for
electric
vehicles
for
for
the
whole
community
evs
they
are
cheaper
to
operate.
I
drive
an
ev,
I
get
to
drive
by
a
gas
station
and
wave
at
it
and
and
say
thank
you
very
much,
but
I
don't
have
to
go
in
there.
I
also
don't
have
to
pay
for
any
fluids
or
any
other
type
of
maintenance.
E
Additionally,
the
noisy
maserati
that
drives
around
my
neighborhood
with
a
quiet
s
ev.
You
don't
hear
that,
so
it
improves
our
quality
of
life
in
many
many
ways,
but
I
live
in
a
single
family
home
and
I
have
accessibility
to
charging
my
car
and
it
makes
it
much
easier
for
me,
but
a
lot
of
people
in
this
community
who
we
are
trying
to
encourage
to
get
access
to
ev
vehicles
or
purchase
ev
vehicles
do
not
have
access
to
charging.
E
They
live
in
multi-family
homes,
they
maybe
they
live
in
a
single
family
home,
but
there's
a
lot
of
people
who
live
there
and
they
may
not
be
able
to
charge
up
their
vehicle.
So
that
to
me
is
the
the
number
one
obstacle
what
steps
are
or
how
are
you
addressing
those
efforts
to
not
just
educate
people
that
evs
are
a
good
source
of
good
alternative
for
a
a
fossil
fuel
vehicle,
but
allowing
a
bill
encouraging
construction
of
charging
stations
or
access
to
charging
stations?
So
how
do
we?
How
do
we
address
that?
Q
We've
been
asking,
we've
been
exploring
and
and
we
need
more
refinement
and
that's
what
we
want
to
do
in
partnership
with
the
community
is
refine
that
we
believe
we
we're
confident
the
private
sector
will
take
up
and
occupy
the
profitable
markets,
so
they're
fulfill
that
and
you're,
seeing
that
already
it's
the
the
markets,
where
you
know
it's
kind
of
a
chicken
and
egg,
where
there's
not
enough
evf
vehicles,
but
there's
not
enough
because
there's
no
charging
right
so
so
we
need
to
figure
out
how
we
fill
that
void
and
it
won't
be
profitable,
though
right
so
we'll
have
to
get
in
there
and
start
it.
Q
And
then
you
know,
make
the
investment
and
then
over
time
it'll
be
the
use
will
clip
up.
But
but
you
know,
community
energy
and
dot
have
been
working
to
say:
where
are
some
public
spaces
that
we
could
start
to
do
that
and
then
how
do
we
fund
it?
How
do
we
help
people,
then,
in
those
areas
buy
the
vehicles
and
how
do
we
track
usage
and
how
do
we
make
it
viable?
So
it's
it's
an
answer.
Q
We
we
we're
confident
we
can
solve
and
if
we're
willing
to
make
the
investment
and
and
and
willing
to
sort
of
set
everything
up
for
success,
knowing
that
we
might
not
see
the
returns
on
that
investment
for
for
ten
years,
five
years,
six
years,
lori
ramses
anything
you
guys
been
working
hard
at
this
anything
to
add.
L
L
Another
one
is
support
legislation,
particularly
state
level,
to
get
multi-family
units
charged
right
so
that
they're,
it's
more
like
single-family
homes,
where
it's
accessible
for
a
certain
amount
of
money
and
then,
lastly,
is
to
start
creating
opportunities
to
use
electric
vehicles
that
are
not
necessarily
owned.
So
we're
spearheading
right
now
the
development
of
a
shared
electric
car
share
system
where
we're
starting
to
try
to
find
a
way
to
get
that
done
through
grants
and
things
like
that
right.
L
So
it's
about
getting
it
out
there
making
sure
that
it's
actually
getting
built
when
it's
outside
of
our
control
or
for
state
law
and
then
and
then
using
the
public
facilities
that
we
do
have
to
accelerate
the
effort.
E
P
I
know
I
just
very
much
agree
with
everything
that's
been
said,
and
I
you
know
I
actually
think
I'm
very
excited
about
this
sector
and
and
where
san
jose
clean
energy
can
play
a
role
agree.
We
need
more
public
charging
stations,
but
also
we
need
to
not
forget.
Even
if
you
have
a
charger
at
home,
we
think
public
charging
is
still
going
to
be
important,
because
we
really
want
to
make
sure
that
a
lot
of
that
charging
shows
up.
P
In
the
middle
of
the
day
when
the
solar
energy,
which
is
going
to
become
you
know,
the
prominent
clean
energy
source
on
the
grid
in
california
can
charge
those
vehicles
if
it
all
shows
up
overnight
we're
going
to
have
a
hard
time.
Decarbonizing
our
electricity
supply,
so
we're
working
on
some
really
exciting
things,
and
I
think,
where
san
jose
clean
energy
and
utilities
are
going
to
play
a
really
important
role
and
you'll
see
some
innovative
recommendations.
P
Out
of
us
is
really
sending
those
pricing
signals
and
there's
rate
signals
at
these
charging
hubs
to
people
so
that
we
can
incentivize
the
charging
when
we
can
make
sure
that
that
electricity
supply
is
the
cleanest,
so
really
excited
for
the
work
that
my
team
and
across
the
city
you
know
will
will
work
on
over
the
next
year
or
so.
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
very
needed
and
fun
space
to
be
in.
E
It's
fun
interesting,
okay!
I
I
appreciate
that
I
and
it
it
shows
me
that
you're
really
thinking
about
the
all
the
areas
that
we
might
be
able
to
expand
the
ev
charging,
but,
as
you're
talking
I
was
thinking
about,
is
there
any
legislation
or
a
proposal,
either
federal
or
state
for
tax
incentives
to
for-profit
businesses
who
install
charging
stations
to
give
them
an
incentive
to
create
public
spaces
for
their
charging
stations
and
give
them
a
tax
write-off?
L
I'm
only
aware
of
tax
write-offs
to
install
them.
I
don't
know
of
any
then
for
that
really
interesting
term
you're
making
there,
which
is
then
to
make
them
publicly
accessible.
So,
unfortunately-
and
I
do
follow
the
policy
quite
closely
for
dot-
I
haven't
seen
that
pop
up
yet,
but
one
we
can
maybe
add
into
some
conversations
that
we're
having.
E
Interesting
how
we
might
be
able
to
forward
that-
and
it's
probably
at
the
federal
level
that
that
would
have
to
occur,
and
maybe
that
can't
be
done,
because
we
have
sort
of
a
dysfunctional
federal,
well
congress
I'll
just
say
that
I'll
throw
out
the
congress
and
put
them
all
in.
In
the
same
bucket.
With
that,
I
really
appreciate
this
report.
E
I
look
forward
to
our
discussion
next
week
and
hopefully
adopting
the
report
adopting
your
report
next
week
at
the
city
council
meeting
and
I'm
sure
we'll
have
a
lot
of
members
of
the
public
there
tomorrow
so
or
next
week.
Thank
you
so
much.
This
is
really
really
good
work.
F
Will
there
be
more
storage
of
energy
and
that
they'll
be
more
of
an
even
ability
to
use
clean
energy
at
night?
I'm
you
know
it
was
a
weird.
It
was
interesting
thing
for
me
because
we've
been
told
at
home
charge
only
during
certain
hours
late
at
night,
because
that's
the
best
great
time
to
do
it-
and
you
know
you've
just
made
me
think
so-
I'm
just
wondering,
given
the
improving
storage
capabilities,
do
we
think
that
daytime
is
necessarily
going
to
always
be
the
right
time
to
charge.
P
Yeah,
it's
like
it's
a
good
question
and
I
think
we're
fairly
confident
that
you
know
10
years
from
now.
That's
certainly
going
to
be
an
optimal
time
to
charge
it's
even
an
optimal
time
to
charge
now,
and
what
I'm
talking
about
is
really
that
ten
to
two
period,
where
you
know
a
lot
of
our
utility
peak
pricing
demand
response
programs
come
in
is
that
evening
peak
and
right
now.
P
That
is
a
very
big
challenge
right
the
solar
comes
offline
and
then
essentially,
the
natural
gas
plants
have
to
ramp
up
to
meet
that
evening
load
and
I
do
think
you're
right
over
time.
Battery
storage
will
mitigate
that,
but
there's
only
so
much
that
that
can
do,
and
so
I
think
it's
it's
a
yes
and
we
always
know
there's
going
to
be
charging
at
night,
there's
going
to
be
electrical
load
at
night.
P
That's
always
going
to
be
there
and
we're
going
to
have
to
meet
that
need,
but
I
think,
to
the
extent
that
we
can
get
some
of
this
new
ev
charging
load
charging
in
the
middle
of
the
day
by
putting
chargers
where
people
already
are
like.
I
think
we
have
great
opportunities
at
our
libraries
at
our
parks,
where
hey,
if
you're
dropping
off
your
kids,
you
can
charge
for
a
half
hour
and
you
know
accomplish
multiple
things
and
making
it
very
convenient,
I
think,
is
where
we
have
a
lot
of
opportunity.
P
I
think
we
also
have
a
lot
of
opportunity
with
just
pricing
and
so
for
fleet
owners
like
uber
and
lyft.
You
know
pricing
to
show
that
you
know
that
middle
of
the
day
is
more
attractive
to
them
to
get
them
to
plug
in
there.
So
I
think,
there's
just
a
lot
of
innovative.
You
know
rate
structures
and
marketing
that
we
can
work
on
over
the
next
few
years.
Great.
F
I'm
glad
we
have
a
smart
team
in
our
city
working
on
this.
I
I
and
I
hope
that
all
future
storage
won't
just
be
lithium
battery,
but,
as
we've
talked
about
before
thermal
storage,
gravity,
storage
and
other
methods
of
storage
as
well,
are
more
than
likely
to
be
coming
online.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you.
I
know
councilmember
foley
called
this
an
exciting
report.
I
got
to
tell
you
seeing
slide
11
to
me.
I
would
call
this
a
sobering
report.
I
what
I
didn't
hear
in
in
any
of
this,
and
I
I
have
to
say
I
didn't
read
the
entire
71
page
pages,
but
I
did
I
did
browse
through
it
and
I
didn't
see
anything
about
cost
so
cost
to
the
public
cost,
even
for
the
city
to
lead
by
example.
B
I
know
several
of
us
council
members,
myself
included,
have
already
been
part
of
total
green,
but
what
is
the
cost
differential
from
what
we're
doing
to
what
that
would
cost
us
to
do
that?
Citywide
do
do
we
have
any?
I
guess
I
have
a.
I
have
real
trouble
saying
I'm
comfortable
moving
this
forward
and
saying
yes,
let's
achieve
this
by
2030,
without
having
any
indication
about
what
this
is
going
to
cost
us.
Q
Council
member,
thank
you,
and
you
know
we
strongly
believe
and
and
and
it's
foundational
that
to
move
this
program
forward,
we
have
to
get
outside
funding.
So
we
that's
part
of
the
rfp
that
we
have
on
the
street.
Now
is
the
to
to
hire
a
third
party
to
help
bring
in
some
of
that
outside
money
and
then
help
homeowners
transition.
So,
in
terms
of
the.
Q
Q
Well,
I
I
okay
so,
but
it's
depends
on
how
you
look
at
it.
So
when
someone
needs
to
buy
a
new
furnace,
there's
already
a
cost
to
buying
that
furnace
as
an
example
right.
So
what
we're
looking
to
do
is
to
shave
the
increment.
So
what's
the
cost
difference
between
what
you
needed
to
buy
and
install
versus
what
now
we
would
like
you
to
buy
and
install.
B
And
to
operate
because
for
us
for
us
when
we
replaced
our
furnace
to
what
was
it
two
years
ago,
two
years
ago,
my
husband's
sitting
here,
sorry
listening
when
we
replaced
our
furnace
two
years
ago,
it
wasn't
the
incremental
cost
of
going
all
electric
for
the
for
the
you
know,
heat
pump
itself,
because
we
actually
did
do
a
a
small
furnace
and
a
heat
pump.
B
Q
And
so
right,
so
so
what
we're
seeing
now
is
the
cost
of
natural
gas.
The
trajectory
of
that
is
very
different
and
we
know
that
that
will
increase
at
a
rate.
Well,
it
looks
today
like
it
will
increase
at
a
rate
faster
than
the
cost
of
electricity.
Q
So
at
this
point
the
cost
of
natural
gas
is,
as
lori
reminds
me
about
double
what
it
was
last
year,
so
so
that
cost
is
is
going
up.
But
what
we're
suggesting
in
this
in
this
document
this
framework
is
that
when
we
bring
forward
specific
policies,
that's
when
we
would
bring
that
amount
of
information
forward
to
say:
hey,
look,
here's
the
transition!
We
want
to
make
here's
what
the
pricing
forecasts
look
like,
because
we
need
a
little
bit
more
information
to
understand
all
of
those
costs.
Q
But
what
we're
not
proposing
is
removing
people's
gas
stoves,
removing
their
gas
fireplaces.
We're
not
saying
replace
everything,
but
we
are
looking
for
efficiency
measures.
So
if
we
believe
that
everyone
should
replace
their
furnace
and
everything
in
their
home
to
electricity
right
so
when
they
go
to
install,
say
an
ev
charger
at
their
home,
we
like
to
help
educate
them
on.
Q
Maybe
we
should
upgrade
the
whole
of
the
electrical
infrastructure
for
your
home,
so
you
don't
have
to
do
it
three
different
times
for
three
different
pieces
of
appliance,
but
but
we
we
do
believe
that
and
if
we
stay
true
to
our
principles
of
the
good
life
2.0
that
if
we
do
this
the
right
way,
the
cost
will
it
will
not
result
in
significantly
more
to
operate
all
electric
appliances
in
in
the
long
run
or
or
at
the
time
of
policy
implementation.
Q
We
did,
though,
forecast
the
cost
of
the
whole
city
going
to
total
green,
and
it
was
not
something
that
that
sort
of
made
the
budget
list
of
recommendations
this
year
for
exactly
what
you're
talking
about
it
was
cost,
but
we
did
move
several
departments.
Esd
is
one
of
them
that
we
did
move
to
to
total,
bringing
in
laurier,
ramses
or
julie.
Anything
to
add
to
the
kind
of
really
speaking
to
the
money.
Part
before.
B
Q
Can't
well
mostly
because
we
really
think
that
sort
of
a
city
slice
of
it,
the
leading
by
example,
slice
is
not
the
biggest
thing
we
can
do
from
the
community.
B
But
mending
do
it,
but
2030
is
eight
years
from
now.
It's
not
even
eight
full
years
from
now.
So
I
just
want
to
be
clear.
The
bottom
line
for
everything
that
you
just
said
is
we
don't
know
the
costs.
What
what
you
also
said
was
we
believe
in
the
long
run
it
will
be
cheaper,
but
I
gotta
say:
economists
have
a
saying
and
it's
in
the
long
run,
we're
all
dead.
B
B
I
think,
can
I
just
I'll
I'll
save
you
all
the
trouble,
the
the
bottom
line?
Is
we
don't
know
the
costs
or,
if
you
know
them,
you
didn't
put
them
in
the
report
and
the
cost
the
one
little
lead
by
example.
The
cost
for
the
city
to
go
total
green
is
too
expensive
for
us
to
do
right
now
and
there's
no
plan
even
for
us
to
do
that
for
all
of
the
departments.
So
I
just
want
to
be
clear
that
we
don't.
B
Q
So
councilmember,
if
I
could
just
clarify
so
if,
if
we,
if
we
had
more
information
on
sort
of
the
financial
implications
and
that
would
sort
of
fill
what
you're
seeing
as
a
void
as
a
void
today,
so
you
know
let
let
me
let
me
work
with
the
team
and
see
and
see
what
numbers
we
can
come
up
with.
Q
I
don't
know
that
they'll
fully
satisfy
you,
but
definitely
appreciate,
and
you
know
the
concerns
and
and
definitely
concerns
we've
heard
from
the
community
as
well,
and
that's
where
we're
really
trying
to
ensure
that
that
the
community
doesn't
believe
we're
going
to
bring
forward
policies
that
don't
make
good
financial
sense.
So
you
know
our
our
sort
of
strategy
is
that
we
we,
when
we
bring
policies
forward,
we
would
have
more
complete
information
on
on
the
monetary
components.
Q
But
I
can
also
appreciate
that
you
know,
while
climate
smart
in
itself
does
have
does
have
numbers
in
terms
of
the
total
cost
that
climate
smart
would
would
require
the
total
investment
and
it,
and
it
is
admittedly,
a
frightening
number
when
we
revise
and
update
climate
smart.
We
would
include
those
numbers
again,
and
that
is
something
that
that
we're
looking
to
do
in
in
the
next
year.
But
you
know
we'll
we'll
we'll
look
to
get
more
of
that
information,
but
but
appreciate
the
feedback.
B
Well,
in
the
I
will
say
that
the
net
present
value
calculation
of
accelerating
this
work
to
2030
also
changes
it
and
makes
it
more
expensive
right
because
we
have
to
spend
the
dollars
sooner.
So
I
hope
that
you
will
keep
that
in
mind
and
that's
again
why
I
have
such
reservations
about
this.
I
wanted
to
ask
about
the
electric
grid
capacity.
B
I
didn't
see
anything
about
that.
We're
talking
about
space
and
water
heating,
which
are
very,
very
intensive
electric
uses.
Do
we
have
the
capability
and
in
the
next
eight
years
again
I
want
to
talk
about
we're
talking
about
by
2030
in
the
next
eight
years.
Do
we
have
the
confidence
that
the
grid
could
take
that
kind
of
capacity
on
a
year-round
basis,
knowing
that
we
have
rolling
blackouts
as
it
is
on
the
in
the
hottest
days.
Q
Thank
you
again
great
questions,
and
so
you
know
one
of
the
reasons
that
we're
bundling
three
three
sort
of
climate
related
items
next
week
is
so
that
those
conversations
can
be
had
together,
because
that
information
is
a
part
of
the
building
electrification
framework.
And
but
you
know,
without
having
to
wait
eight
days,
julie
or
laurie.
Do
you
guys
have
anything
to
to
any
perspective?
To
add
up
to
that.
P
Short
council
member,
it's
a
really
important
question
and
you
know
one
thing
that
will
really
improve
electric
reliability
for
the
region
is
the
california
iso,
which
runs
the
transmission
grid
in
california,
is
proposing
the
construction
of
two
new
transmission
lines
to
serve
the
region
that
will
be
constructed
by
2027
so
within
this
time
period
and
that's
going
to
add
significant
capacity
to
the
grid
here
in
the
south
bay.
P
We
are
also
coming
to
council
in
the
fall
with
recommendations
on
our
integrated
resource
plan,
which
looks
forward
over
the
next
10
to
20
years
on
what
type
of
supply
we
need
to
invest
in,
to
make
sure
that
we
can
meet
these
goals
and
and
fully
decarbonize.
I
think
the
piece
that
you
know
probably
worries
you
and
worries
me.
P
The
most
is
the
distribution
system
and
making
sure
those
upgrades
on
the
distribution
system
also
happen,
but
there
are
several
open
proceedings
at
the
public
utilities
commission
to
address
those
issues,
because
the
state
very
much
recognizes
that
electrification
needs
to
occur
in
order
for
the
state
to
meet
our
climate
goals.
So
I
hope
that
answers
your
question.
B
It
does
thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
and
then
laurie
do
you
have
an
update
just
because
I
know
we
have
source
issues.
Do
you
have
an
update
on
diablo
and
nuclear
as
a
potential
carbon
neutral
source
going
forward?
Sure.
P
No
happy
to
talk
about
that.
So
that
is
also
you
know.
Some
new
developments
just
over
the
last
few
weeks,
so
diablo
canyon
is
california's
last
nuclear
power
plant.
It
was
in
the
process
of
being
decommissioned
and
should
have
been
complete
in
that
process
in
2024.
B
B
Yes,
it
is
cheaper
to
purchase,
but
it
also
has
a
lower
range,
and
so
the
the
option
of
of
using
it
on
a
on
a
regular
basis
or
for
for
long
commutes
would
not
be,
would
not
be
possible
unless
you're
able
to
charge
at
both
ends
and
then
the
other
thing
charging
at
home.
I
have
the
ability
to
charge
at
city
hall,
but
charging
at
home.
Actually
we
did.
The
calculation
is
much
cheaper
for
us,
so
we
end
up
charging
overnight
rather
than
charging
just
at
city
hall
because
of
the
pricing.
B
Even
if
I
wait
until
it's
a
little
bit
cheaper
during
the
day,
there's
there's
part
of
the
time
that
it's
more
expensive
and
part
of
the
time
that's
cheaper.
It's
still
cheaper
for
me
to
do
it
at
home.
So
I
know
you're
aware
of
that,
because
you
mentioned
mentioned
the
issue,
but
I
wanted
to
do
the
right
thing,
and
so
we
got
it.
We
got
an
ev.
We
got
an
older
one
because
the
range
didn't
matter
for
me
to
go.
B
You
know
to
city
hall
and
around
my
district,
but
but
charging
at
city
hall
when
there's
daytime
hours
was
what
I
wanted
to
do
and
it
ends
up
not
being
financially.
I
mean
it's
feasible
for
me,
but
it's
it
doesn't
make
financial
sense
for
me
to
do
that.
So
I
just
want
to
point
that
out,
like
even
at
our
own.
You
know.
Accessibility
is
not
the
issue.
P
Yeah,
it's
such
a
good
point
and
and
something
that
I
think
you
know
that's
where
san
jose
clean
energy
and
utilities
can
play
an
important
role
in
that
retail
pricing.
You
know
right
now,
that's
largely
set
by
the
the
private
sector
and
it's
not
always
a
function
of
the
electric
supply
costs.
It's
also
just
you
know
in
part
what
kind
of
profit
they
can
make
on
on
that
investment,
and
so
I
think
it's
going
to
be
really
important.
P
P
B
Yeah,
thank
you
before
I
call
on
you,
council,
member
cohen,
councilmember
peralta.
You
had
your
hand
up
and
down
a
couple
of
times,
and
I
want
to
give
you
the
opportunity
to
speak.
If
you,
if
you
want
to.
I
Yeah,
thank
you.
Sorry.
I
was
having
some
connectivity
issues.
Thank
you
and
I'll
be
brief.
I
know
we're
running
out
of
time
and
I
can
say
most
of
my
comments
when
it
comes
to
the
full
council.
I
did
just
want
to
say
I
appreciate
you
know
the
the
direct
questions
from
our
chair,
because
we
should
be
really
eyes
wide,
open
and-
and
I
recognize
that
right,
that
2030
is
it's
not
necessarily
around
the
corner
right.
I
It
is
a
little
less
than
eight
years,
but
it
is
gonna
come
sooner
than
we
know
it,
and
you
know.
I
think
that
we
should
have
the
the
full
picture
in
front
of
us
and
if
we
don't
have
that
today,
which
it
sounds
like
we
don't
right,
then
we
should
have
that
as
soon
as
possible.
So
then
that
way
we
truly
can
be
honest
with
ourselves
and
everybody
else
hey.
What
is
it
going
to
take
to
achieve
this
carbon
neutrality
by
2030
and
what's
the
cost
right?
What
are
the?
I
What
are
the
trade-offs
and
and
just
being
very
clear
with
that
that,
similarly
to
the
chairs
example,
even
obviously
our
own
right,
we
know
some
of
that
where
we
can
understand
the
trade-off
and
then
be
able
to
make
those
decisions.
I
I
think,
as
we're
we're
looming
closer
to
a
deadline,
you
know
it'll
make
it
the
pressure.
It'll
put
the
pressure
on
right
to
actually
make
some
of
those
decisions,
and
that's
why
I'm
comfortable
you
got
a
boo-boo
too
buddy,
sorry,
guys
and,
and
so
it'll
put
the
pressure
on,
and
that's
that's
why
I
do
support
right
this
this
goal.
It
is
at
the
moment,
aspirational,
but
we
have
to
and
I'm
comfortable
with
councilmember
foley's.
I
F
Thanks
and-
and
I
know,
I've
come
across
overly
passionate
about
this
topic,
but
it's
I
think
it's
an
important
one
and
I
I
do
appreciate
your
questions
and
it's
important
for
us
to
have
the
answers
to
those
not
just
because
you
know
we
have
to
make
this
decision
for
ourselves
a
city,
but
because
it's
better
for
us
to
be
able
to
answer
to
our
constituents
as
to
you
know
what
what
the
true
effect
is
and
make
sure
that
if
they
have
fears
that
we
can
allay
those
fears
right,
I
mean
it's
that's
important,
because
we
need
consensus
on
this
and
councilmember
davis
makes
a
good
point.
F
I
mean
there's.
There
is
profit
now
in
the
charging,
that's
out
there
in
the
public,
but
just
like
there's
profit
and,
I
would
say,
price
gouging
in
gasoline.
We
see
prices
that
are
way
above
what
the
costs
are
now
and
I
I
don't
expect
that
any
public
entity
is
going
to
necessarily
be
as
cheap
as
doing
it
at
home,
but
it
is
frustrating
to
me
as
well
with
my
ev
that
I
feel
like
well,
there's
no
point
charging
during
the
day
I
might
as
well
go
home
and
charge
because
it's
cheaper.
F
I
still
know,
though,
that
filling
my
car
using
elect
using
electricity
is
cheaper
than
if
I
were
driving
a
gas
vehicle
and
going
and
filling
it
with
gas,
so
either
way
it's
still.
It's
still
a
better
deal.
In
my
opinion.
You
know
I
just
like
to
reframe
this.
Sometimes
though,
because
the
cost
of
not
doing
this
is
far
greater
than
the
cost
of
doing
it,
and
I
think
we
need
to
we
have
always
in
our
economic
and
policy
making
decisions
left
out
the
the
true
cost
of
things
when
we
talk
about
what
something
costs.
F
Yes,
this
is
a
global
problem,
so
it's
hard
for
us
to
necessarily
separate
what
are
doing
this.
You
know
we're
not
necessarily
going
to
prevent
the
effects
of
of
climate
change
by
doing
a
disjust
ourselves,
but
we
can't
wait
always
wait
for
others
to
go
first.
F
Somebody
has
to
be
taking
the
lead
on
this,
and
my
expectation
is
that
others
will
be
following
and
we'll
be
better
prepared,
because
we're
doing
this
now
when
other
cities
are
trying
to
catch
up,
the
thing
is
the
state's
going
to
require
some
of
these
things
by
2029
we're
hearing
the
air
quality
management
district
is
going
to
say
all
new
appliances
have
to
be
electric
by
2029.
So,
whether
right
now
it
pencils
out
or
not,
san
jose
is
not
going
to
make
that
decision.
F
We're
not
requiring
it
we're
saying
we're
going
to
facilitate
that
transition
so
that
when
the
state
requires
it,
our
residents
are
better
prepared
and
more
likely
to
be
able
to
afford
it.
I
think
that's
the
way
we
should
look
at
it.
That's
kind
of
why
I
made
the
first
aim
that
I
made
we
as
a
city
should
be
facilitating
this
transition.
That's
coming
in
california,
hopefully
elsewhere.
We're
I'm
very
frustrated.
It's
not
happening
elsewhere
as
quickly.
F
F
So
you
know
while
well
we're
doing
this
for
raul's
son,
who
was
with
him
just
a
second
ago,
because
we're
all
going
to
be
we're
all
going
to
have
to
be
doing
this.
So
I
do
expect
these
things
become
cheaper
with
scale
as
more
things
go
in.
I
do
expect
we'll
find
a
way
we'll
find
ways
to
fund
it
using
third
party
money.
F
I
gave
the
example
of
ithaca
last
year.
I
think
in
new
york
made
this
commitment
to
do
this
and
they're
not
paying
a
dime
out
of
their
general
fund,
because
they've
raised
all
the
private
money
to
do
it.
I've
talked
to
kerry
and
others.
I
know
you're
working
hard
to
try
to
find
some
of
that
funding
as
well,
and
that's
what
I
expect
the
next
eight
years
to
be
is
for
us
to
learn
about
where
to
get
that
funding
from
and
provide
those
resources
to
our
residents
into
our
city,
so
that
we
can
do
this.
F
We
can't
know
all
the
answers
today,
but
if
we
don't
provide
that
road
map
to
getting
there,
we
won't
achieve
it
for
sure-
and
I
think
that's
what's
important
about
this,
but
it's
a
great
conversation,
I
think
really
important
one.
So
I
I
look
forward
to
continuing
it
next
week.
F
I'm
sure
we'll
have
some
of
the
same
discussions
and
questions
in
a
larger
form,
but
I
think
it's
important
for
us
in
this
committee
to
understand
the
distinction
between
us
staying
as
a
city
we're
forcing
people
to
do
something
versus
us
as
a
city
saying
we're
going
to
facilitate
a
process
that
is
both
necessary
and
will
be
dictated
upon
us
if
we
don't
so
anyways.
Let
me
miss
that
point.
Thanks.
C
I
C
N
M
Hi,
where
pikmin
here
can
I
have
the
timer
started.
Thank
you.
Hi
play
beakman.
I
missed
the
meeting
today
I
was
at
a
doctor's
appointment.
You
know
it
reminded
me
with
the
things
on
the
agenda
items
today.
M
I
I
think
a
lesson
we
can
learn
hopefully
or
way
the
work
I
can
mention
these
items
is
that
for
all
the
items
today
for
yourselves
as
council
persons
and
for
the
people
listening
at
home,
you
know
I
I
usually
have
something
fairly
important
to
say
on
each
of
the
items
that
were
listed
today
and
if
that,
if
you
go
over
those
items,
I
think
you
can.
You
know.
M
If
you
do
a
little
concentration,
you
can
think
of
what
I
would
be
saying
on
each
of
those
items,
and
you
know
what
could
be
just
some
simple,
good,
progressive
ideals
and
logic
that
I
tend
to
you
know
I
say
often
at
public
common
time
that
can
be
very
applicable
to
the
items
today.
I
will
be
speaking
on
them
again
as
the
months
go
on.
So
I'm
sorry,
I
missed
the
items,
but
you
get
the
gist
of
how
I
can
speak
about
these
things
and
where
my
general
direction
feelings
are
about
these
items.
M
I
hope
you
can
look
at
them
and
think
of
what
I
would
be
thinking
of
these
items,
just
simple
small
little
progressive
ideals
that,
when
repeated
back
to
ourselves,
it's
just
nice
to
hear
and
nice
reminders
for
ourselves
and
that's
what
I'm
trying
to
learn
how
to
do
so,
thanks
a
lot
with
my
remaining
time.
M
I
you
know
a
few
weeks
ago,
henry
kissinger
was
being
laughed
at
for
the
ideas
of
trying
to
create
a
a
neutral
space
to
talk
about
russia
and
and
people
of
the
east
side
of
ukraine
having
certain
amount
of
issues,
rights
and
then
the
west
side
of
ukraine
having
a
certain
amount
of
rights.
That
was
the
negotiation
process
from
the
very
beginning,
but
this
country
can't
talk
about
these
things
honestly
and
openly.
M
D
Jill
borders
hi.
Thank
you.
Yes,
this
is
jill
borders
and
I
just
wanted
to
follow
up
and
kind
of
circle
around
to
something
that
has
been
going
on,
which
is
the
mobile
home
designation
use.
D
Designation
and
a
week
ago
I
attended
the
last
public
hearing
for
the
budget
with
the
mayor,
and
the
mayor
listened
to
my
question,
which
was
in
fact
can
we
find
the
almost
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
that's
needed
in
the
budget
to
make
this
happen,
as
we
thought
that
it
was
going
to
happen,
and
his
response
just
really
took
me
quite
by
surprise.
I
must
say
he
said,
as
you
know,
jill
that
was
never
going
to
happen.
D
You
know
we
didn't
have
the
money
and
that
you
know-
and
I
thought
it
was
such
an
odd
thing
to
say
to
me.
You
know,
as
you
know,
jill,
because
the
truth
is.
I
did
not
know
it,
and
I
do
tell
the
truth.
I'm
a
truth.
Teller,
that's
one
thing.
I
hope
people
would
know
about
me
and
so
no
I
I
never
did
think
that
it
was
based
on
some
future
budgeted
money
that
had
to
be
gotten
and
so
two
things
one.
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you.
D
I
don't
know
what
the
result
was,
whether
council
person
perales
was
able
to
put
a
memo
out
or
not,
but
even
just
acknowledging
me
and
our
community.
I'm
really
grateful
for
that
when
you
did
that
at
the
last
meeting
saying
that
you
thought
that
that
was
going
to
happen
as
well
as
council
member
foley,
because
the
both
of
you
made
me
feel
like
I
wasn't
crazy.
D
I
wasn't
hearing
things
I
I
didn't
make
it
up
in
my
head
when
I
was
at
those
meetings,
and
so
thank
you
for
that
and
if
nothing
comes
of
it,
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you
knew
that.
I
was
appreciative
of
what
you
had
said
and
that
you
are
willing
to
go
to
bat
for
us.
It
means
a
lot.
Thank
you.
So
much
back.