►
From YouTube: JAN 26, 2022 | Move San José Online Workshop
Description
Recording of public meeting to discuss recent updates to the draft plan, Move San José, the access and mobility plan for the City of San José. More at https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-government/departments-offices/transportation/projects-planning/move-san-jose.
A
A
This
plan
is
the
city-wide
transportation
plan
that
we
are
looking
to
bring
to
council
soon
after
we
get
further
feedback
from
the
public
before
we
get
into
presentations.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
all
of
our
resources
are
folks
are
aware
of
our
resources.
We
have
an
asl
interpreter,
as
you
can
see
up
there
on
the
screen
live
closed.
Captioning
is
also
available
to
use
it.
There
is
a
live
transcript
button
at
the
bottom
of
the
screen.
Please
click
on
that
and
the
text
will
start
showing
at
the
bottom
of
the
screen.
A
We
also
have
a
copy
of
the
presentation,
we'll
be
showing
with
descriptive
text
for
all
of
the
images
we're
using
and
corrine.
I
believe
you're
gonna
drop
a
link
to
that
in
the
chat
right
now
with
those
important
messages
sent
out
we're
gonna
dive
in
so
I've
introduced
myself.
I'm
gonna
introduce
some
of
the
team
here
that
has
been
working
on
this
plan
and
will
be
speaking
with
us
tonight,
and
we
have
wilson
tam
from
the
department
of
transportation
he's
our
planning
manager.
A
We
have
natasha
upfell
also
from
the
san
jose
city
team,
and
she
manages
our
multi-modal
transportation
improvement
plans.
We
also
have
joe
taylor
from
arab,
our
consultant
team.
He
has
been
doing
a
lot
of
work
on
this
plan.
We're
very
excited
to
have
him
here
and
we
also
have
adam
berger
here
from
vta
our
valley,
transportation,
authority,
transit
agency,
who's
going
to
say
a
couple
words.
A
B
Okay,
there
we
go
hi
everyone
and
thank
you
for
coming
to
the
open
house.
Adam
berger,
I'm
a
senior
transportation
planner
with
the
valley,
transportation
authority
and
I've
been
the
staff
liaison
to
this
project
for
a
little
while
and
like
a
lot
of
other
work
that
the
city
of
san
jose
is
doing
right
now,
this
is
impressively
progressive
when
it
comes
to
investing
in
the
transit
system.
This
work
lays
out
a
vision
for
how
transit
can
be
better
and
a
number
of
policy
changes.
That'll
help
us
get
there.
A
Great
thanks,
adam
as
part
of
the
work
for
this
plan,
we've
been
very
fortunate
to
to
be
able
to
work
with
some
community-based
organizations
who
have
been
helping
us
craft.
The
content
of
this
plan
making
sure
that
we're
hearing
from
folks
that
we
and
city
government
traditionally
don't
hear
from
us
we're
very
excited
to
bring
them
on.
A
B
Hello,
my
name
is
christine
fitzgerald
community
advocate
for
the
silicon
valley.
Independent
living
center
scilc
is
very
dedicated
and
committed
to
working
with
people
with
disabilities
with
all
different
kinds
of
disabilities
to
improve
their
quality
of
life
and
independence
in
a
variety
of
ways,
and
this
is
just
one
of
those
ways
back
to
you.
B
Thank
you,
omar
hi.
My
name
is
omar
vazquez.
I'm
part
of
the
executive
oral
luna
and
luna
is
a
communal
organization.
Working
for
latinos,
and
also
here
he's
supposed
to
be
speaking
here-
is
tony
romero:
romero
hill,
the
organizer
who
helped
us,
especially
in
the
transportation
department
luna.
Thank
you.
C
D
B
Oh
great,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
omar
yeah,
I'm
tony
tony
romero.
I'm
a
humane
organizer
with
luna
latinos,
united
from
new
america
and
we've
been
working
with
ramses
and
some
of
the
staff
at
the
department
of
transportation
building
the
bridge
between
the
community,
the
latino
community
and
the
city
in
order
to
bring
more
of
our
voices
to
to
the
planning
to
to
these
projects
that
the
city
wants
to
implement.
E
E
D
A
The
plan,
along
with
all
the
input
we've
gotten
from
folks,
can
we
make
sure
we
get
the
slide
deck
link
into
the
chat
window.
We're
getting
a
question
on
that
all
right.
Can
we
go
back?
One
slide.
I
jumped
over
the
agenda
slide,
so
just
a
quick
touch
on
on
what
we're
gonna
be
doing.
Tonight,
we've
done
our
introductions.
A
We
are
going
to
be
doing
a
couple
polls
throughout
just
to
get
folks
is
kind
of
brains
going
on
the
content,
we'll
be
talking
about
we're
going
to
be
talking
a
little
bit
about
the
community
profiles
and
outreach.
We've
been
doing
to
really
highlight
some
of
the
transportation
concerns
which
we
know
there's
a
lot
and
hopes
out
there
and
then
we'll
be
providing
an
overview,
of
course,
of
the
plan
itself,
along
with
the
potential
strategies
that
the
plan
is
proposing
to
take
on.
A
After
the
explanation
of
the
plan,
I
will
be
doing
another
poll
and
then
we're
gonna
get
into
the
kind
of
technical
detail
now.
This
is,
of
course,
the
third
round
of
outreach
for
this
effort,
and
so
we've
done
a
lot
of
development,
and
so
the
heart
of
this
presentation
really
will
be
around
the
technical
development
and
analysis
that
have
led
us
to
the
proposals
that
we're
going
to
be
working
on
do
stick
around
till
the
end.
A
F
F
First,
with
this
icebreaking
question
that
we
would
like
to
ask
you
about,
and-
and
this
question
is
really
about
asking
us
to
help
us
understand
your
thoughts
about
transportation
in
general,
in
the
city
of
san
jose
and
to
participate
in
these
poll.
Questions
just
wait
for
these
options
to
display
on
your
screen.
F
Great,
why
don't
we
see
some
interesting
result?
Okay,
so
we
are
seeing
that
almost
half
of
the
responses
refer
to
public
transit
schedules
being
one
of
the
the
most
important
transportation
issues
that
are,
that
is
impacting
san
jose
right
now
we
also
see
a
lot
of
responses
surrounding
the
cost
of
travel.
The
gas
price
is
high,
the
transit
fares
are
high.
F
F
F
And
so
we,
like
these
nine
people,
we
we
call
them
like
personas
and
basically,
we
are
trying
to
formulate
community
profiles
based
on
these
people
that
we
interviewed
with,
and
these
nine
people,
interestingly,
have
unique
transportation
demands
and
needs,
and
and
and
highlighting
on.
This
screen
are
two
people
that
we
are
very
happy
to
interview
and
join.
Their
commute
on.
Lam
is
a
a
gentleman
seven
twenty
one
years
old
and
he
uses
buses
to
really
meet
all
their
transportation
needs
to
including
getting
around.
F
B
A
A
A
What
differentiates
this
plan
from
other
planning
efforts
is,
of
course,
like.
I
just
noted
the
data-driven
approach
to
decision
making
that
we're
bringing
here
deeper
engagement
with
the
public
and
making
these
decisions,
as
well
as
being
an
umbrella
plan
right.
So
the
outcome
of
this
plan
is
really
trying
to
help
steer
where
the
resources
of
the
city
are
going
and
transportation
from
a
holistic
perspective.
A
How
do
people
get
around
the
city,
and
how
can
we
help
everyone
get
around
better
next
slide,
please
earlier
in
this
plan's
development,
we
worked
a
lot
with
community
members,
our
community-based
organization,
as
well
as
a
through
a
lot
of
workshops
on
really
refining.
What
are
san
jose's
transportation
goals?
A
A
F
A
Is
access
for
all?
We
know
that
transportation
plays
a
huge
part
in
people's
ability
to
afford
where
they
live,
get
access
to
everything
from
you
know,
jobs,
seeing
their
friends,
education,
doctor's
offices
and
everything.
We
also
know
that
transportation
resources
historically
not
gone
to
underserved
communities
and
have
not
gone
to
folks
who
have
limited
mobility
for
various
reasons,
so
we're
really
focusing
on
that
another
one
is
clean.
A
As
we
all
know,
it
can
be
dangerous
on
the
roadway.
There
are
many
deaths
on
the
roadway
every
year
and
addressing
that
both
is
a
moral
kind
of
focus
of
all
work
and
transportation,
but
also
is
very
important
to
getting
folks
to
ride
their
bike
more
and
walk
more
or
feel
comfortable
using
their
wheelchairs
or
other
mobility
devices
around
the
city.
E
E
So
it
has
taken
a
long
time
to
kind
of
get
where
we
are
because
of
the
intense
data
analysis
and
community
outreach
that
went
into
creating
this
plan.
On
the
right
hand,
side
we
kind
of
have
this
winding
path
that
goes
through
our
process
and
I'll
go
through
it
really
quick.
The
first
step,
as
ramsey's
was
saying,
was
really
defining
our
goals
and
not
just
setting
these.
You
know
like
big
statements
of
intention,
but
breaking
down
exactly
how
you're
going
to
reach
them.
E
What
are
some
key
data
points
that
will
mean
you
know
what
success
is
or
what
failure
is
so
tracking
our
progress
was
super
important.
Secondly,
we
developed
a
list
of
potential
strategies
together
with
our
community
partners,
our
surveys,
our
technical
advisors.
We
looked
at
you,
know
global
best
practice
and
developed
a
list
of
over.
You
know
150
different
ways.
People
are
moving
the
needle
in
transportation,
then
we
knew
we
couldn't
go
to
the
community
with
you
know
that
many
strategies,
so
we
refined
them
to
see
what
exactly
was
going
to
work
best
for
san
jose.
E
We
know
that
san
jose
is
super
context
specific,
so
we
wanted
to
be
really
effective
in
how
we
were
able
to
achieve
them.
Then
we
calculated
community-based
metrics.
So,
like
I
said,
san
jose
is
a
very
special
city
and
even
within
san
jose,
we
have
very
unique
communities
with
very
specific
needs,
so
we
made
sure
to
use
really
kind
of
modern
and
breaking
you
know
like
boundary.
Breaking
data
sets
that
we
are
able
to
really
zone
in
on
a
block
by
block
basis,
almost
and
evaluate
what
is
going
to
move
the
needle.
E
E
We've
mentioned
community
feedback
and
community
outreach
so
much
in
this
presentation,
but
we
really
wanted
to
highlight
it
one
more
time
to
bring
the
point
home
that
really
deep
community
outreach
has
been
done
on
this
plan,
and
it
goes
without
saying
that
the
last
two
years
it's
been
really
really
difficult
to
do
our
traditional
methods,
but
I
just
want
to
thank
the
whole
team.
That's
been
working
on
this
and
all
of
our
community
partners
and
people
that
brought
us
into
their
neighborhood
association,
zoom
meetings,
our
viva
parks,
movie
night
events-
and
you
know.
E
That
would
have
us
we
were
coming
out
to
try
to
talk
to
this
plan.
We
reached
almost
1500
people
around
san
jose.
We
did
five
online
large
workshops
such
as
this.
We
offered
them
in
different
languages,
then
we
did
12
in-depth
focus
groups
with
you
know,
trying
to
get
all
sorts
of
people
from
the
community,
low-income
folks,
folks
of
different
nationalities
and
cultures,
people
with
disabilities
and
bringing
in
and
to
really
dive
deeper
into
some
of
the
details
of
this
plan.
E
We
developed
a
full
website
to
explain
all
the
things
this
plan
was
proposing
that
had
almost
5
000
unique
page
views.
We
also
also
launched
a
survey
kind
of
like
the
zoom
pole.
You
saw
today
that
had
a
bunch
of
different
questions
about
people's
perceptions
of
transportation
and
what
they
wanted
to
see
done
better,
and
we
have
almost
900
responses
on
that
and
then
we
did
23
hyper
local
community
presentations.
These
were
pop-ups
of
the
table
at
farmers
markets.
E
Next
slide,
please,
through
all
of
that
outreach,
we
heard
a
lot,
but
some
key
takeaways
that
we
really
made
sure
were
enveloped
in
this
plan
were
the
following:
one:
that
any
options
we
propose
are
timely,
reliable,
safe
and
affordable.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
people
can
count
on
what
we're
proposing
and
do
it
in
a
safe
way.
E
E
We
also
in
the
ways
we
can,
as
cot,
address
the
housing
crisis
and
support
unhoused
san
jose
san
jose
and
then,
of
course,
we
need
to
consider
the
needs
and
perspectives
of
households
and
equity
focused
areas
again,
there's
not
one
a
one-size-fits-all
solution,
and
sometimes
thinking
of
people
that
have
been
underserved
and
the
people
that
you
know
need
the
most
gets
us.
The
best
outcomes.
A
E
A
Natasha
transitions
to
the
next
line,
I'm
just
going
to
say
one
thing,
which
is
there's
a
lot
of
people.
Who've
already
found
the
chat.
We
really
we
say
if
you
have
anything,
that's
come
to
mind
questions
you
have,
please
put
them
in
the
chat,
we're
very
happy
to
engage
with
you
there
and
we'll
do
it
be
doing
a
question
an
answer
session.
At
the
end
of
the
presentation
I
forgot
to
mention
at
the
beginning
sorry
about
that
natasha
wilson,.
F
Thank
you
natasha
and
francis.
I
am
our
poll
guy
for
tonight,
so
that
means
that
there
will
be
another
poll
question
coming
up.
So,
as
natasha
said,
we
have
gone
through
a
very
robust
community-based
process
to
really
understand
like
what
are
the
concerns
or
needs
of
the
communities,
and
after
talking
with
more
than
1
500
residents
through
community
meetings
and
surveys,
we
are
able
to
come
up
with
a
list
of
strategies
to
present
to
you.
F
F
F
We
also
are
proposing
to
to
install
more
green
infrastructure.
Such
as
like
trees,
plants
or
storm
water
drains
and
last
but
not
least,
we
would
like
to
implement
safe
biking
facility
to
try
to
slow
down
the
streets
for
all
street
users,
and
so
like
this
bucket
of
strategies
is
really
about
improving
the
physical
infrastructure
in
the
public
realm
to
really
serve
the
diverse
needs
of
the
street
users
next
night,
please.
F
The
second
bucket
is
about
improving
transit,
a
quote
that
we
are
able
to
to
get
from
from
from
rj
here.
You
know
if
people
can
choose
to
move
for
free
through
public
transportation,
instead
of
paying
five
dollars
a
gallon
on
gas
driving
their
cars,
then
we
would
be
able
to.
You
know,
address
the
climate
change
pro
problem
that
we
are
trying
to
assault
we
resolve
here.
F
You
know
rj
brought
up
how
a
resident
at
second
street
studios
allowed
him
to
to
receive
equal
passes,
to
be
able
to
ride
on
on.
You
know,
bta
bus
and
light
rail
for
free,
as
long
as
he
remained
as
a
resident,
and
even
though
he
may
not
be
able
to
ride
public
transit
as
much
as
we
he
used
to
because
of
the
pandemic.
F
The
theme
here
is
really
about
improving
transit,
improving
our
access
to
the
transit
services
and
also
make
transit
more
affordable,
so
things
such
as
like
expanding
transit
surfaces,
improving
the
quality
of
the
stations
and
also
how
people
can
walk
and
bike
to
and
from
the
station
after
they
get
off
the
buses
and
light
rail.
How
can
we
make
transit
fares
more
affordable
to
people
how
and
how
to
redesign
the
that
the
transit
stops
in
a
more
user-friendly
way?
F
F
So
really
about
like
how
can
we
make
the
other
transportation
options
available
and
also
competitive
in
terms
of
like
timing,
affordability,
so
that
people
can
can
see
that,
like,
besides
driving
their
vehicles,
there
are
actually
many
different
ways
to
get
around
san
jose.
So
these
are
the
policies
that
we
are
trying
to
propose
to
to
do.
F
That
first
is
about
like
transit,
first
policy,
which
is
an
effort
about
trying
to
provide
more
transit
facilities
to
support
buses
and
light
rail
operations
on
on
the
streets
on
their
routes,
such
as
providing
like
transit
signals
that
can
actually
allow
the
buses
to
have
a
green
light
moving
forward.
So
they
don't
have
to
stop
at
the
red
light
every
single
intersection
right.
F
F
How
can
we
provide
a
facility
so
that
you
can
feel
safe,
walking
and
biking
around
san
jose?
That's
a
very
good,
very
good
comments
there
great!
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
very
deep
thinking
and
participation,
and
with
that
I
will
pass
it
on
to
joe
to
talk
about
an
example
that
we
can
show
you
tonight
for
understanding.
What
are
the
needs
for
any
of
some
specific
neighborhoods
in
the
city.
C
Great
thanks
wilson:
can
you
hear
me?
Okay?
Yes,
awesome.
I
see
some
thumbs
up
great
yeah.
So,
as
wilson
said,
we're
gonna
have
a
conversation
about
the
district
needs
assessment
that
were
conducted
as
a
part
of
the
move,
san
jose
plan,
as
well
as
kind
of
documenting
this
new
analytical
tool
that
was
developed
to
kind
of
help,
inform
the
duty
strategy
next
slide.
Please.
C
C
C
C
We
all
know
san
jose
is
a
pretty
expansive
city
with
a
variety
of
needs,
depending
on
where
the
city
you
live,
work
and
plan.
We
started
by
identifying
what
makes
each
city
council
district
unique:
what
are
the
characteristics
of
its
population?
What
are
the
major
destination?
Centers
there?
What
are
the
existing
transportation
services
available
there
to
identify
the
range
and
diversity
of
needs?
We
conducted
this
as
this
assessment
for
each
city
council
district
in
san
jose
to
assess
how
the
district
is
performing
across
our
move.
San
jose
goals.
C
Each
goal
area
has
a
set
of
metrics
that
were
grouped
together
to
estimate
a
single
score
for
each
goal.
We
also
compared
the
performance
performance
of
each
metric
between
the
district
as
a
whole
and
for
the
equity
priority
communities
that
are
within
that
district
to
identify
any
disparities
in
metric
performance.
C
Once
we
identify
the
greatest
needs
within
the
district.
We
compare
these
needs
to
what
is
currently
planned
in
that
area.
Are
there
lots
of
bike
projects
there
from
the
bike
plan
that
are
planned?
What
transit
improvements
is
vta
considering
and
where
are
the
gaps
based
on
what
we've
identified
the
needs
are
and
what's
currently
planned,
and
then
we
also
leveraged
a
lot
of
the
outreach
that
we
did
during
this
planning
effort
to
identify
what
people
in
each
district
were
identifying
as
what
their
important
needs
are.
C
C
C
So
for
this
needs
assessment,
we
started
by
identifying
you
know:
what's
the
human
fabric
of
district
three,
and
what
does
that
look
like
what
are
their
demographics
and
socioeconomic
characteristics
that
could
be
impacting
their
transportation
options?
We
use
our
community
equity
indicators
to
quantify
these
and
compare
them
to
a
city-wide
average.
C
You
can
see
here
that
district
3
is
one
of
the
most
diverse
districts
in
san
jose,
with
79
percent
of
its
population
designated
as
people
of
color.
It
is
almost
double
the
rent
burden
and
double
the
amount
of
people
that
are
considered
low
income
compared
to
san
jose
as
a
whole,
and
also,
interestingly
enough,
it
has
a
higher
proportion
of
zero
vehicle
households
than
anywhere
else
in
the
city.
C
Next
slide,
please!
So
now
that
we
have
a
better
sense
of
who's,
the
who
is
living
in
district
3,
we
can
use
our
new
methodology
and
tools
to
quantify
how
district
3
is
performing
across
our
move.
San
jose
goal
areas.
Each
goal
area
has
its
own
set
of
metrics
that
our
decision
support
system
analyzes.
C
C
C
You
can
see
here
at
the
bottom
of
the
table
that
enjoyable
transportation
and
less
driving
have
the
low
scores
across
our
nine
nine
move,
san
jose
goals
based
on
our
metrics
associated
with
each
goal.
We
identified
that
enjoyable
transportation
is
scoring
low
here,
because
there's
poor
transit,
speed
and
transit
reliability
in
district
three
less
driving
also
needs
improvement,
because
the
metric
we
use
for
commute
mode
share
is
far
from
our
established
2040
goals,
which
needs
improvement
and
for
transportation
safety.
The
lowest
score
is
most
attributed
to
a
high
bike
stress
in
district
3..
C
C
Next
slide,
please
so
we're
going
to
dive
into
this
analysis
for
transportation
safety
a
bit
more
to
investigate
what
is
causing
this
goal
area
to
underperform
for
district
3..
So
one
of
the
metrics
that
is
used
to
score
transportation.
Safety
is
level
of
bike
stress.
This
is
a
measure
of
how
safe
people
feel
while
biking
and
includes
parameters
like
what
the
roadways
feed
is
and
what
level
of
protection
the
existing
bike
infrastructure
has.
C
The
map
on
the
right
shows
that
district
3
has
relatively
high
bike
stress
values
throughout
meaning
that
people
will
not
feel
as
safe
biking
here
as
other
places
in
the
city
bike
stress
in
district
3
is
particularly
bad
on
the
western
side
near
the
airport
in
deardon
station,
because
bike
stress
is
high
in
district
3,
the
transportation
safety
goal
area
performs
poorly
here,
other
metrics
that
are
used
to
calculate
transportation.
Safety
are
the
number
of
severe
fatal
crashes
by
mode
pedestrian,
stress,
transit,
stress
and
the
number
of
crashes
on
our
vision,
zero
corridors.
C
This
data
analysis
was
supported
by
the
outreach
that
we
heard
throughout
this
plan.
Our
user
persona
kyle
here
has
stated
that
he
feels
like
he
risks
his
life
every
day,
choosing
to
not
take
a
car
and
that
he's
particularly
interested
in
traffic
selling
strategies
to
make
him
feel
safer
while
biking
on
market
in
santa
clara
streets.
C
C
So
the
areas
in
district
3
that
have
the
highest
jobs
accessibility
by
bike
are
also
have
the
highest
bike.
Stress
scorers,
although
many
destinations
can
be
reached
within
a
short
bike
trip,
many
won't
feel
safe
doing
so
with
our
existing
transportation
infrastructure,
we
can
use
our
new
tool
and
methodology
to
identify
gaps
in
these
metrics
and
recommend
strategies
to
improve
these
goal
area
scores
and
later
I'll
talk
about
how
we
can
leverage
this
new
methodology
to
estimate
the
impact
the
strategies
have
on
our
metrics
and
their
related
goals.
C
Next
slide,
please.
So
we
have
identified
a
set
of
strategies
using
our
new
tools
and
framework
that
will
help
improve
the
transportation,
safety,
enjoyable,
transportation
and
less
driving
goal
areas
in
district
3..
We've
also
heard
through
our
outreach
and
engagement.
What
types
of
strategies
g3
residents
need
and
where
they
should
be
implemented,
for
example,
from
our
focus
groups,
we
heard
that
protected
bike
infrastructure
and
flexible
transportation
options
were
important
for
d3
residents.
C
We
combined
these
and
identified
where
there
is
overlap
between
outreach
outreach
and
our
data
driven
analysis
to
help
inform
our
final
recommendation
for
this
district.
Although
d3
needs
improvement
on
all
goal
areas
there.
These
are
good
places
to
start,
given
our
limited
time,
resources
and
funding
to
achieve
our
move,
san
jose
goals.
C
C
C
With
our
new
tool
and
framework,
we
can
estimate
the
changes
and
metrics
that
are
impacted
by
building
out
all
these
bike
projects,
for
example,
availability
of
options
by
area,
complete
streets
services
and
amenities
that
are
within
a
20-minute
bike.
Ride
travel
time
between
neighborhoods
by
non-auto
modes,
bike,
mode,
share
and
vehicle
miles.
Traveled
are
all
improved
with
these
projects.
This
would
improve
move
san
jose
goals,
have
less
driving
connected
neighborhoods,
clean
the
air,
transportation,
safety
and
others
next
slide.
C
C
We
found
that,
under
this
scenario,
we
improved
metrics
like
transit,
travel
time,
competitiveness,
transit
speeds,
transit
stress,
travel
times
between
neighborhoods
by
transit
and
jobs,
accessibility
within
a
30-minute
transit
trip.
This
improves
less
driving,
enjoyable
transportation,
connected
neighborhoods
and
clean
the
air
goal.
Areas
next
slide,
please
so
the
third
potential
future
we
evaluated
was
evaluating
an
equity-centered
future
wherein
we
prioritize
planned
projects
for
equity
priority
communities.
C
With
this
potential
future
metrics
like
cost
of
transportation
as
a
percentage
of
household
income,
bike,
ped
and
transit,
stress,
accessibility
to
jobs,
goods
and
services,
auto
mode
split
and
vehicle
miles.
Traveled
are
all
improved
next
slide.
Please
and
the
final
potential
future
we
evaluated
was
what,
if
we
add
in
more
programs
and
policies
on
top
of
this,
this
includes
things
like
the
transit
first
policy,
introducing
smart
parking
policies,
means-based
transit
fares,
things
like
encouraging
electric
vehicles
encouraging
and
allowing
car
share.
C
Next
slide,
please,
oh,
I
think
next
slide
there
we
go,
and
so,
although
these
potential
futures
make
progress
towards
our
goals,
there's
still
a
lot
to
be
done
and
with
our
new
tools
and
methodologies,
we've
created
a
process
that
we
have
in
place.
Now
that
helps
us
move
in
the
direction
that
we
need
to
be
going
in
and
allows
us
to
prioritize
our
limited
time,
resources
and
funding
to
make
the
most
impactful
changes
to
our
community
there's
only
so
much.
We
have
control
over
harvard
to
meet
our
goal.
C
C
So
this
won't
be
easy,
but
we
have
the
tools
and
the
strategy
now
to
help
us
make
meaningful
progress
towards
these
goals.
For
more
information
on
this
new
tool
and
our
framework
and
methodology,
I
encourage
you
all
to
visit
the
new
san
jose
webpage
on
the
city's
got
site
and
with
that
I'll
hand
it
over
to
natasha.
E
So
I
know
that
the
chat
has
been
really
active
with
a
bunch
of
questions.
I
love
how
engaged
everyone
is,
and
I
think
people
who
are
being
very
critical
and
asking
some
really
hard-hitting
questions.
I'm
not
sure
how
we
want
to
start
this,
but
ramses
is
going
to
be
fielding
most
of
them.
I
can't
see
like
who
has
their
hand
up
or,
or
anything
like
that,
in
my
view.
Unfortunately,
so.
A
Corinne
and
avery
will
help
us
with
that.
So
yeah,
if
you
have
any
questions,
you'd
like
to
ask
us,
please
do
raise
your
hand,
raise
your
hand
down
on
the
bottom.
Further
questions
can
be
asked
in
the
in
the
chat
and
also
I
just
posted
a
a
small
url
of
bitly
bit.ly
dash
mood
san
jose.
That's
where
the
actual
plan
is,
and
we
definitely
want
as
many
people
as
possible
to
read
as
much
of
the
plan
as
possible.
Give
us
feedback
there.
A
D
This
is
that's
right,
you
can
yeah.
This
is
corrine.
I
do
some
work
with
ace
in
addition
to
the
city
of
san
jose
and
yes,
the
h
shuttle
is
a
shuttle
that
is
timed
to
the
ace
trains
that
come
in
from
stockton
through
great
america
station
next
to
levi's
stadium
in
santa
clara
and
then
to
deer
down
san
jose,
and
they
do
have
some
time
shuttles
to
their
trains
that
people
can
get
on
if
they
disembark
at
great
america
station.
D
D
B
B
A
So
the
city
is
through
this
plan
and
many
other
plans
that
it's
an
efforts
involved
in
working
to
develop
as
many
different
options
in
last
mile
as
everything
from
looking
at
developing
community-based
shuttles
to
the
scooter
program
that
a
lot
of
folks
have
mentioned
already,
we
have
a
bike
share
program
and
also
just
making
the
sidewalks
easier
for
folks
who
can't
bike
to
use
making
sure
that
all
of
our
curb
cuts
are
there
making
sure
that
our
infrastructure
is
maintained.
Well
is
another
one.
A
D
G
Much
it's
actually
two
questions,
one
does
the
department:
this
is
a
residence.
Does
the
department
of
transportation
have
sort
of
a
neighborhood
guideline
for
neighbors
that
want
to
change
things
on
their
street,
such
as
you
know,
turning
a
four-way
intersection
into
a
traffic
circle
or
being
able
to
mitigate
that?
So
then,
cars
aren't
rushing
through
intersections.
G
One
thing
as
a
designer,
because
I
am
a
civil
engineer-
is
that
I
run
into-
is
that
most
anything
has
to
be
designed
and
it
takes
forever
in
order
to
get
through
the
city.
So
I
would
love
it
if
there's
a
way
to
just
say,
if
you
have
a
certain
distance
between
curves
from
you
know,
you
know
opposite
curve
to
opposite
curve.
G
A
So
we,
as
they
say,
design
policy,
is,
is
very
important
to
making
you
know
addressing
things
like
speeding
and
and
safety,
and
all
of
these
things
we've
recently
adopted
a
complete
streets,
standards
and
guidelines
that
does
help
us
address
issues
at
that
larger
level
and
the
balance.
How
many
reasons
how
much
resources
there
are
in
you
know
bringing
about
different
improvements.
Right
becomes
kind
of
the
the
the
driving
force
here
right.
So
we
have
policies
that
are
working
towards.
A
You
know
bringing
down
what
we
call
design
speeds
on
streets
as
much
as
possible,
so
that
drivers
don't
kind
of
just
feel
comfortable
driving
at
higher
speeds
on
roads
and
as
we
do
the
pavement
program,
we're
repaving
all
of
the
streets
in
san
jose
through
measure
t
that
was
passed
a
couple
of
years
ago
and
through
that
program,
we're
doing
as
much
as
we
possibly
can
in
terms
of
redesign
of
roads
to
do
the
kinds
of
things
you're
talking
about.
So
I
state
one
in
safety.
A
Design
rubber,
rubber,
stamping
in
general
is,
is
a
little
scary
right,
because
every
every
situation
is
a
little
bit
different,
but
we
overall
have
the
the
city
policies
and
the
design
policies
within
the
city
are
driving
towards
what
you're
talking
about
it
is
a
matter
of
you
know.
A
traffic
circle
costs
actually
a
lot
of
money
to
install
right,
and
so
we
can
install
three
of
those
or
we
can
do.
You
know
30
something
else
right
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
making
those
balanced
questions
off.
B
A
Was
at
the
vision,
zero
meeting
just
last
year
at
the
end
of
the
year,
and
I
was
dismayed
to
find
out
that
our
death
numbers
were
high
and
I'm
following
san
jose
pd's
twitter.
I
noticed
that
they're
up
to
nine
deaths
on
the
streets
of
san
jose
and
I'm
wondering
if
what
what
is
the
plan
to
curtail
these
deaths
and
these
high
numbers
that
we've
been
seeing
in
the
last
couple
years?
A
A
We
know
that
safety
is
a
primary
driver
for
folks
to
not
drive
their
cars
around
and
get
out
and
do
things
that
are
more
environmentally
and
friendly,
and
all
that
so
there's
a
lot
of
motivation
to
get
those
done
from
that
perspective.
But
the
core,
the
core
motivation
is
people
should
not
be
taking
their
lives
into
their
own
hands
when
they're
traveling
around
right,
and
so
I
will
say,
council
did
support,
taking
all
excess
funds
that
are
in
the
transportation
area.
E
D
We
also
have
a
traffic
calming
tool
kit,
which
is
another
thing
that
I
think
the
caller
that
the
question
might
find
helpful
because
it
is
more
tailored
to
residential
neighborhoods
and
the
treatments
that
are
appropriate
there
and
kind
of
how
we
think
about
which
treatments
are
appropriate,
where
so
that
that
might
be
a
helpful
resource
as
well.
Thanks
for
letting
me
interject.
G
No
worries
this
actually
comes
as
a
developer's
rep.
As
I
said,
I'm
a
civil
engineer
and
something
that
came
up
on
recently
on
a
fully
county,
funded,
low-income
housing
project
was
the
city
basically
wanted
to
take
more
sidewalk
than
was
actually
proposed
even
originally,
then
that's
actually
even
out
there
currently
right
now,
and
it
wasn't
until
very
late
in
the
game
that
they
came
back
and
said.
G
G
A
I
mean,
I
would
say,
that's
outside
the
scope
of
this
plan,
but
I'll
speak
briefly
to
your
point.
We
do
have
sidewalk
requirements,
they're
in
the
complete
streets,
standards
and
guidelines,
as
well
as
whatever
area
plan
may
be
adopted
for
the
area
and
so
apologize
that
that
wasn't
communicated
to
you
and
that's
something
we
can.
A
B
On
students,
in
addition
to
everything
else,
you're
focusing
on
could
be
really
helpful.
You
know
a
lot
of
them
can't
drive.
You
know
they
could
be
more
independent
if
it
were
safe
for
them
to
walk
or
bike
or
take
transit,
or
you
know
if
there
is
a
convenient
bus
line
to
get
them
to
school
and
you
know
get
them
in
the
habit
early,
while
they're
young
and
in
palo
alto.
A
A
A
D
A
Let's
see
just
getting
through,
I
see
one
from
alan
williams
here
kind
of
you
know
what
kind
of
asking
a
question
about.
You
know
who
who
gets
more
benefit
or
who
do
more?
People
get
benefit
from
biking
versus
transit
and
I'll
say
we
don't
see
them
as
as
it's
conflictual
right.
We're
we're
trying
to
improve
both,
and
sometimes
we
make
strategic
decisions
around
hey.
A
You
know,
santa
clara
street
is
really
gonna,
be
the
focus
of
bus
traffic
and
san
fernando
will
be
the
the
focus
of
bike
traffic,
and
then
we
really
make
those
those
environments
as
as
beneficial
to
those
modes
I'm
going
to
hopefully
get
a
benefit
to
both,
and
so
we're
trying
to
do
our
best
to
make
sure
that
all
of
these
modes
can
grow
as
best.
We
can.
C
A
It's
a
pretty
complicated
picture
because
there
are.
There
are
many,
many
many
grant
programs
that
bring
money
down
to
the
transportation
system
from
the
federal
and
state
levels.
Some
of
them
support
very
particular
things.
You
know,
they'll
only
support
what
we
call
active
transportation,
so
buses
are
bikes
and
walking
kinds
of
things.
Other
ones
are
specifically
for
there's
lots
of.
You
know
electric
bus
grants
coming
out
right
now,
ev
charging
grants,
and
so
the
programs
get
set
up
by
legislators.
A
You
know,
there's
everything
from
that:
there's
a
huge
fund
to
help
us
build
bridges
or
rebuild
bridges,
because
there's
a
lot
of
bridge
issues
across
the
country,
and
so
there
the
decisions
get
made
at
the
legislative
level
in
terms
of
the
intent
of
the
money
and
then
the
the
agencies
that
implement
the
the
that
intent.
You
know
like
the
federal
dot
federal
department
of
transportation,
sometimes
department
of
energy
kind
of
depending
on
where
it
ended
up
going.
A
Then
I
kind
of
administer
that
and
they'll
make
lots
of
program
rules
around.
You
know
who
exactly
is
eligible
for
that
and
and
what
requirements
around
equity
and-
and
you
know,
payoff
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff
get
get
put
in
there.
We
could
do
a
a
few
days
on
on
kind
of
understanding
that,
but
I
hope
that
helps
a
little
bit
in
terms
of
doing
that,
so
advocacy
for
funding
and
transportation.
B
B
Early
on
kind
of
drew
my
attention
where
it
talks
about
how
the
implementation
of
comprehensive
traffic
coming
projects
is
limited
only
to
residential
two-lane
and
local
neighborhood
collectors
streets,
as
opposed
to
you,
know
other
streets.
In
addition,
it
seems
like
the
justification,
for
that
is
that
some
of
these
other
roadways
are,
you
know,
intended
to
carry
higher
volumes
of
traffic,
and
I'm
thinking
is
that
there's
a
lot
of
roads
that
I
could
have
potentially
high
pedestrian
deaths
or
that
could
be
in
need
of
you
know
traffic
calming
measures
such
as
you
know.
B
You
know
santa
clara
avenue
things
like
that,
and
this
kind
of
essentially
keeps
those
completely
from
being
able
to
have
changes
made
to
them
kind
of
the
assumption
that
their
goal
is
to
carry
high
volumes
of
traffic,
and
you
know
at
speed,
whereas
I
think
that
assumption
that
baseline
assumption
might
not
be
correct
and
that
there
should
be,
you
know
higher
priority
on
safety
as
well.
As
you
know,
what's
the
purpose
of
this
street?
Is
it
to
just
shuttle
people
through
downtown
or
to
help
build
the
wealth
in
that
area?
B
And
I
think
you
know
thinking
of
those
large
streets
as
just
a
way
to
shuttle
cars
through
kind
of
is
a
disservice
to
the
areas
around
them,
and
so
my
question
is
kind
of
how
does
the
city
go
about
changing
streets
like
those?
Is
it
just
not
possible
to
do
so
or
is
it
a
completely
different
process.
A
A
Those
other
roadways
have
other
ways
of
addressing
design
and
improvement
right
so
because
they're
they're
used
by
both
the
communities
around
them,
as
well
as
the
larger
populous,
more
the
biggest
programs
that
we're
implementing
and
working
on
those
designs
is
through
our
our
greatly
expanded
pavement
program.
As
pavement
programs
come
up,
we
look
carefully
at
all
of
the
major
arterials
and
all
of
the
roads
that
the
pavement
program
is
is
working
on
and
we
do
our
best
to
bring
the
resources
at
hand
at
that
time.
A
To
do
everything
like
everything
from
adding
protected
bikeways
to
you
know
bringing
bulb
outs
or
at
least
where
we
can't
afford
more
shrinking
lanes
and,
and
things
like
that,
to
make
things
more
focused
on
safety
and
and
bringing
down
design
speeds
for
cars.
So
we
we
we
we
do
not
basis.
The
base
assumption
in
dft
is
not
oh,
these
these
streets
are
just
for
pumping
cars
through,
for
example,
but
we
are
most
certainly
focused
a
larger
perspective.
A
Hall,
roads
all
streets,
complete
streets,
meaning
that
they
are
inviting
and
safe
for
all
the
users
most
certainly
will
take
a
long,
a
good
amount
of
time
to
get
there,
but
we're
not
only
looking
at
those
smaller
streets
like
you're,
talking
about
which
we'll
get
the
toolkit
is
kind
of
a
comes
from
an
assumption
of
addressing
smaller
streets.
I
hope
that
helps.
D
Thanks
ramses,
I
think
we
have
just
like
two
more
minutes,
and
I
just
want
to
note
that.
There's
a
few
comments
and
questions
in
the
chat
about
how
bart
affects
all
this
when
it
comes
in-
and
I
was
just-
we
really
only
have
about
two
minutes.
But
if
you
or
adam
wanted
to
speak
to
that
at
all,
just
wanted
to
open
that
space
up.
C
C
A
To
make
sure
that
folks,
wanting
to
get
to
those
stations
by
bike
by
walking
or
by
car,
are
unable
to
do
so
in
an
inviting
and
safe
fashion,
so
does
bart
do
planning
for
us
there's?
No,
they
do
add
some
some
knowledge.
They
have
some
great
folks
who
work
with
us
to
help
think
through
some
of
these
issues.
So
in
that
way
they
do,
but
the
planning
is
is
kind
of
technically
done
by
vta
and
the
city
around
them.
A
Adam,
you
want
to
add
anything
great
all
right,
so
we
are
at
five
minutes
left
and
we
one
want
to
thank
just
the
the
amount
of
folks
who
have
showed
up
and
how
much
energy
folks
have
been
putting
into
their
questions
and
the
chat.
It's
always
so
great
to
to
see
folks
engaged
in
these
big
questions
and
and
wanting
to
and
wanting
to
engage.
A
C
A
A
Thank
you
joe
there.
It
is
again
we
are
also
looking.
We
will
be
doing
community
based
presentations,
so
if
you're
part
of
a
neighborhood
group
or
other
gathering
and
would
like
to
engage
with
the
team
as
we
live
out
this
last
round
of
engagement
on
this,
please
do
reach
out
to
us.
We
also
have
twitter
channel
and
facebook,
where
we
post
a
lot
of
information
about
this.
A
I
will
also
say
this
year
is
a
really
big
year
for
dot
in
terms
of
planning
and
thinking
about
the
future
of
the
transportation
system.
This
is
one
of
the
major
plans
coming
forward
this
year.
The
downtown
transportation
plan
is
also
in
a
similar
state.
Wilson.
Here
is
the
project
manager
for
that,
along
with
eric
eidlin,
and
they
that
plan
is
out
for
review
as
well.