►
From YouTube: Governing Body Meeting 1/25/2023 Part 1
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
I'm
calling
the
meeting
to
order
regular
meeting
of
the
governing
body
for
January
25th
2023
at
5
10
in
the
evening.
Let's
begin
as
we
do
with
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance
from
councilor
mayor
worth,
salute
to
the
New
Mexico
flag
from
councilor,
Lee,
Garcia
and
invocation
and
remembrances
from
counselor
Chavez.
Please
rise.
B
C
So
I
wanted
to
talk
about
something
that
I
have
just
acknowledged
recently.
So
I've
noticed
recently
that
I
had
been
acknowledging
and
appreciating
appreciating
the
light
people
offer
I
find
myself
often
thanking
people
for
their
light,
their
light
in
their
kindness
understanding,
guidance,
knowledge
and
love.
All
those
things
really
guiding
me
in
so
many
different
ways.
Every
day
our
world
can
be
heavy
and
dark
these
days,
often
bringing
out
the
worst
in
us.
So
it
makes
sense
that,
when
an
individual
shines
in
one
way
or
another
I
would
take
notice.
C
I
want
to
thank
those
individuals,
because
their
glow
has
encouraged
me
to
be
intentional
in
allowing
my
mind
and
heart
to
shine
my
light
and
contribute
to
brightening
up
what
has
been
darker
days.
I
wanted
to
remind
our
community
and
my
colleagues
of
the
power
of
the
concept
of
light
and
encourage
awareness
and
attention
about
how
we
project
ourselves
or
how
we
shine
will
guide
us
in
love
in
good,
in
leadership
and
in
positive
change.
I
encourage
encourage
us
all
to
see
the
light
and
to
be
the
light.
C
As
Amanda
Gorman
wrote
in
her
poem,
the
hill
we
climb,
for
there
is
always
light,
if
only
we're
brave
enough
to
see
it,
if
only
we're
brave
enough
to
be
it,
may
we
all
be
brave
enough
to
be
in
our
roles
as
leaders
and,
most
importantly,
in
our
roles
as
community
members
that
light
our
worlds
so
desperately
needs
right
now.
Thank
you.
D
Ahead,
councilor
I
would
just
like
to
take
a
moment
to
recognize
those
lives
lost
during
essentialist
tragedies
this
past
week.
Violence
is
never
a
course
of
action,
and
we.
F
D
A
Thanks
everybody,
please
take
a
seat.
If
you
have
a
cell
phone,
that's
on,
could
you
please
make
sure
it
doesn't
ring.
H
A
G
Mayor
we
need
to
remove
item
15a,
it's
the
introduction
of
a
resolution.
Okay,.
A
A
There's
a
second
and
a
motion:
is
there
a
discussion?
Can
we
please
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye.
I
A
Say,
nay,
motion
carries
Madam
clerk
for
the
consent
agenda.
What
are
we
looking
at.
A
D
Approve
the
oh,
yes,
there's
two
items:
I
need
to
request
to
be
removed,
one
to
abstain,
one
to
recuse,
so
good,
quick
removal
to
quick
action,
which
ones
are
we
talking
Item
B,
as
in
boy
I,
item
L,
is
in
love
both.
A
A
G
A
G
That
is
presentations.
We
have
a
presentation
for
the
audit
update
for
fiscal
year
21
by
Emily
Oster,
our
finance
director.
A
A
K
Yep,
it
does
thank
you
good
evening,
counselors
I'm,
pleased
to
let
you
know
that
we've
completed
our
first
on-site
visit
with
the
external
Auditors
from
car
Riggs
Ingram.
They
were
with
us
all
day
on
Thursday
last
week.
K
They
are
working
on
fy21
and
FY
22
audits,
simultaneously,
they
spent
their
time
documenting
processes
and
internal
controls,
and
we've
been
following
up
on
questions
and
continuing
to
meet
with
them,
as
we
have
done
virtually
for
some
time
now
we
are
reviewing
the
federal
grants
they're,
starting
with
the
federal
compliance
audit,
also
known
as
the
single
audit
again
working
on
both
years
simultaneously,
which
will
give
us
some
efficiency.
This
is
very
normal
and
typical
of
the
audit
process.
We're
progressing
as
I
would
expect.
At
this
stage.
K
E
Good
evening,
director
Alistair
as
far
as
our
Targets
in
regards
to
I
think
June
is
when
we're
expected
to
have
both
of
them
complete.
Is
that
we're
still
on
Mr.
G
Yes,
mayor,
our
next
item
would
be
item
9B
that
was
removed
by
counselor
Michael
Garcia,
its
request
for
approval
of
the
December
21st
2022
special
governing
body
meeting
minutes.
D
G
D
G
Yes,
counselor
Chavez,
yes,
counselor
Lee,
Garcia,.
F
A
A
A
G
D
A
D
That
thank
you,
Mr
Mayor
I
would
like
to
recruse
myself
from
this
item
as
I
work
for
the
federal
agency
that
hosts
these
volunteer
programs.
Great.
B
I
A
There
you
go,
there's
a
motion
and
there's
a
second:
is
there
a
discussion
seeing
No
Hands
Madam
clerk?
Can
you
call
the
roll.
E
G
A
Thank
you.
Could
you
I
guess
city
managers
bringing
counselor
Garcia
back
good.
G
Yes,
mayor,
the
next
item-
sorry
that
was
pulled
was
count
item
n,
and
this
is
a
resolution
relating
to
Firearms,
recognizing
that
certain
City
properties
are
used
for
school
related
activities,
which
makes
the
carrying
of
a
deadly
weapon
on
such
properties
of
fourth
degree
felony
pursuant
to
New,
Mexico,
nmsa,
sorry,
1978.
G
A
E
Thank
you,
mayor,
I
basically
pulled
this.
Obviously
I
was
not
in
support
of
this
at
the
last
committee
meeting
that
it
was
presented,
I
believe
that
we
need
to
do
everything
in
our
power
to
keep
people
safe
and
I.
Think
that
is
what
the
intention
here
is
well.
My
main
concern
is
with
this
is
keeping
us
out
of
any
type
of.
E
Issue
of
People
contesting
our
actions
here
and
again:
I'll
read
this
from
the
New
Mexico
State
Constitution
Article,
2,
Section
6
right
to
bear
arms,
Allah
Bridge,
the
right
of
the
citizen
to
keep
and
bear
arms
for
security
and
defense,
or
lawful
hunting
and
recreational
use
and
for
other
lawful
purposes,
but
nothing
therein
shall
be
held
to
permit
the
carrying
of
concealed
weapons.
No
municipality
or
County
shall
regulate
in
any
way
and
in
this
in
in
an
incident
of
the
right
to
keep
and
bear
arms
and
I
know.
E
The
intent
of
this
is
to
notify
people
that
if
there
are
school
age
children
sanctioned,
you
know
we
need
to
host
science
or
weird
to
post
science.
The
first
part
of
it
is
I.
I
would
like
to
see
I
I
disagree
that
this
will
work.
E
E
Is
the
wording
on
these
signs
going
to
be
appropriate
in
terms
of
how
it
directs
people
to
the
state
statute
that
we
are
trying
to
follow
here,
and
so
those
are.
Those
are
my
big
big
concerns
and
that's
the
reason
that
I
pulled
it
and
so
I'll
yield
the
floor
from
there.
Thank
you
thank
you.
I
Thank
you,
mayor
I,
initially
approved
this
finance
committee,
but
upon
further
thought
thinking
along
the
same
lines
as
counselor
Garcia,
with
the
constitutionality
of
it
that
being
a
a
big
concern
and
then
another
one
is.
How
are
we
going
to
be
able
to
enforce
what
we're
doing
here?
Initially
I
supported
it,
because
all
it
was
doing
was
enforcing
current
state
law
that
allows
for
this
to
happen.
I
Protected
only
Public
School
sanctioned
Events.
Maybe
that's
why
the
signs
would
be
staying
up
all
the
time
but
I
think
again
the
issue
of
potential
litigation,
I'm,
not
sure
it'll
fly
that
test,
but
I'm
sure
that'll
that'll
come
later.
Thank
you
mayor
answer.
A
Are
there
others
who
want
to
speak
to
this
item
at
this
time?
I
think
councilor,
Michael
Garcia
has
his
hand
up.
D
Just
a
quick
couple,
questions
I
think
it
was
at
our
Public
Works
and
utilities
committee.
F
M
Mr
Mayor
councilor,
Garcia
I
was
not
able
to
track
down
that
sign.
My
understanding
and
conversation
with
the
city
attorney
is
that
our
sign
would
reference
the
state
statute,
but
beyond
that
we
don't
have
the
verbiage
of
it.
Yet,
okay,.
L
L
Counselors,
the
article
that
I
sent
out
to
everybody
does
have
a
picture
of
the
sign
that
initially
Albuquerque
used.
L
I,
don't
know
if
they're
still
using
the
same
sign
but
I
understand,
based
on
conversations
with
Council
that
the
signs
should
still
be
up.
I,
don't
know
if
they're
the
same
signs
or
updated
signs,
but
there's
a
picture
of
one
of
the
original
signs.
In
the
newspaper
article
that
I
circulated.
Okay.
D
Thank
you.
Thank
you
director.
Thank
you,
madam
City
attorney
and
the
reason
I
ask
is
because
the
state
statute
were
referencing
for
this
resolution.
D
References
deadly
weapons
not
not
specifically
Firearms
but
deadly
weapons,
and
when
that
that's
such
a
broad
category,
immediate
thoughts
come
to
mind
and
I.
Think
I
brought
up
these
concerns
in.
N
D
Meeting
deadly
weapons,
what
what
is
that
and
I
mean
immediately
well,
besides
a
firearm,
what
could
be
considered
knives?
Anything
sharp
that
type
of
stuff
mace
I
mean
is:
is
that
considered
and
I
think
do
we
have
a
full
list
abroad
list
of
what
we
are
considering
a
deadly
weapon
because
should
should
somebody
walk
into
a
facility
and
police
officer
then
issued
them?
A
citation
I
would
like
for
folks
to
know
that
hey.
L
Mayor
Library,
counselors
I
did
offer
to
answer
this
type
of
question.
If
at
any
time
you
had
it,
oh
so
I
was
not
asked
this
outside
of
right
now,
I'm
aware
of
whole
cases
analyzing
that
question,
because
it
comes
up
in
many
statutes.
So
it's
a
type
of
Statute,
that's
enforced
in
many
contexts,
not
just
this
one
regularly
by
the
police.
D
Okay,
so
we
don't
have
a
list,
though,
because
I
guess
my
question
is,
for
example,
if
you
go
into
the
Joseph
Montoya
building
across
the
street,
deadly
weapons
aren't
allowed
in
there
and
items
like
mace,
whereas
you
know
I
I
know,
for
example,
when
my
my
wife
would
go
visit
me
there.
She
had
mace
in
her
purse
because
she
wants
to
protect
herself
at
all
times
and
she
had
to
leave
that
in
the
vehicle.
D
She
didn't
know
that
that
was
not
allowed
and
and
I'd
hate
for
a
citizen
to
be
put
in
that
situation,
where
they're
carrying
an
item
that
is
not
allowed,
and
they
now
are
facing
this
fourth
degree.
Felony,
citation
and
I
think
we
I
I
would
hope.
We
would
have
some
type
of
clarity,
besides
Firearms
I,
think
which
would
be
a
given.
D
Challenges
with
when
ghost
sanctioned
events
are
being
performed
and
with
the
with
City
Hall
being
on
that
list
of
one
of
the
identified
locations.
D
D
You
know
these
are
common
tools
used
by
contractors
and
so
according
to
that
and
and
our
and
that's
where
I
was
asking
for
clarification
around
deadly
weapons,
because
I'd
hate
for
contractor
or
somebody
coming
in
to
get
a
permit
to
then
be
in
trouble
because
they're
doing
their
job
they're
coming
to
get
plans
like
they
have
been
doing
for
the
last
decades
and
and
then
they
get
in
trouble.
So
how
do
we
plan
to
resolve
issues
like
that.
M
Mr
Mayor
counselor
Garcia
I
would
imagine
that
deadly
weapon
would
need
to
be
defined
on
the
sign,
so
that
people
would
be
able
to
be
clear
on
what
was
allowed
and
not
allowed,
but
I'll
defer
to
the
City
attorney
on
any
additional
information.
Remember.
L
Director
there's
a
case
interpreting
deadly
weapon
for
that
statute:
It
Was
Written
in
2009
by
Justice
Daniels.
That's
what
I
thought
it
was
probably
about.
So
there
is
a
definition.
That's
been
thoroughly
discussed
in
that
case.
That
case
was
about
whether
a
pocket
knife
was
and
they
determined
it
wasn't.
M
And
Mr
mayor
council
Garcia,
if
I
could
add
I,
have
a
definition
from
the
police
what
they
determine
deadly
weapon.
Thank
you
sure,
see
Champlin.
If
I
can
read
that
to
you,
it
may
be
helpful.
M
Deadly
weapon
means
any
firearm,
whether
loaded
or
unloaded,
or
any
weapon
which
is
capable
of
producing
death
or
great
bodily
harm,
including,
but
not
restricted
to
any
types
of
daggers:
brass
knuckles,
switchblade,
knives,
Bowie,
knives,
Conyers
butcher,
knives,
Dirk
knives
and
all
such
weapons
with
which
dangerous
Cuts
can
be
given
or
with
which
dangerous
thrusts
can
be
inflicted,
including
sword,
canes
and
any
kind
of
sharp
pointed
canes,
also
slingshots,
flung
shots,
bludgeons
or
any
other
weapons
with
which
dangerous
wounds
can
be
inflicted.
F
D
So
that
the
public
is
well
aware,
because
this
this
is
I-
think
we're
moving
forward
with
an
existing
law
where
at
this
moment,
based
off
the
interpretation
from
the
city
attorney.
If
anybody
in
this
room
had
a
deadly
weapon,
they
would
be
in
violation
of
state
law.
It
would
be
able
would
be
issued
a
citation
fourth
degree
citation
I
mean
if
this
path
didn't
pass.
D
The
law
still
is
in
effect,
and
somebody
can
be
cited
and
I
think
that's
where
there's
some
confusion
right
now
within
the
public
that,
with
this
action,
we're
approving
new
laws,
we're
not
approving
any
laws.
Correct
director,
Mr.
D
And
and
again
just
for
clarification
for
the
public,
because
we're
we're
proposing
to
and
stop
install
signage
that
brings
about
awareness
of
the
existing
law.
Okay,
thank
you.
A
No
other
questions
Mr
Mayor.
Thank
you.
Are
there
other
comments
about
this
resolution
and
its
implications?
I
think
councilor
Garcia.
His
last
statement
is
absolutely
the
case.
We
have
an
existing
law
on
the
books
that
prohibits
deadly
weapons
from
arriving
in
buildings
where
their
school
sanctioned
or
supported
activities.
A
We're
simply
saying
we
intend
to
make
sure
the
public
knows:
City
buildings
and
Facilities,
where
those
activities
are
taking
place
and
alert
them
to
the
fact
that
deadly
weapons
are
prohibited
from
those
those
venues,
and
it
is
a
statement
of
purpose
I
think
it's
an
intent
to
do
exactly
what
councilor
Garcia
talked
about
in
his
invocation
remarks,
we
have
just
witnessed
another
round
of
horrific
killings
with
more
innocent
people,
slain
and
I
think
we
are
at
a
Crossroads
as
a
nation
and
as
a
community
we
have
to
take
a
stand.
A
A
I
went
to
see
the
governor
today
and
assured
her
that
she
has
my
support
with
her
slate
of
bills
in
this
legislative
session
to
go
further
than
we
have
as
a
state
to
make
sure
that
lives
are
safe,
kids
are
safe,
families
are
safe
and
that
weapons
are
kept
out
of
the
hands
of
people
who
should
not
have
them
I
regard
these
as
common
sense,
public
safety
measures,
and
we
are-
we
are
asked
by
our
constituents
as
the
highest
order
of
our
priority
to
emphasize
Public
Safety.
A
With
this
resolution,
we
are
responding
to
that
request
from
the
public
that
we
take
their
Public
Safety
to
heart,
and
we
will
do
everything
and
anything
we
can
to
protect
our
kids
and
our
families
at
a
time
when
there
is
Untold
Carnage
in
cities
across
America
other
comments
or
questions
Madam
clerk.
Do
you
want
to
call
the
roll.
G
Yes,
mayor
I
just
want
to
confirm:
I
have
counselor
Merrell
worth
with
the
motion
and
counselor
Chavez
says
the
second:
was
it
counselor,
cassid
or
Chavez?
We're.
G
Kind
of
what
that
was
my
clarification.
You
can
take
it.
Okay,
I,
had
you
both
down
councilor
Michael
Garcia,.
H
I
A
A
G
Yes,
the
next
item
is
item
o
it's
consideration
of
a
resolution
sponsored
by
mayor
Weber,
counselor,
Casa
and
counselor
Chavez.
It's
a
resolution
adopting
the
Midtown
Community
Development
plan
for
the
Midtown
Redevelopment
project,
lee
logsdon,
our
Midtown
asset
development
manager
and
Mr,
rich
brown,
our
community
development
manager
available
director.
Sorry,
okay,.
H
Mayor
I
just
wanted
to
know
I'm
fully
in
support
of
this.
We
did
significant,
yes,
but
I'd,
say
stylistic
grammar
and
other
changes
and
I
I
sponsored
a
lot
of
those
in
partnership
with
staff
and
they're,
currently
not
in
the
packet.
Yes
and
so
I
guess
I'm
wanting
to
understand,
or
maybe
hear
from
my
colleagues
about
their
appetite
to
go
through
them,
because
you
haven't
seen
them
and
so
I'm
wondering
if
staff
had
a
solution
to
this
yeah.
L
B
A
All
right,
yeah.
H
On
that
point
on
that
motion
I'm,
just
also
wanting
to
let
folks
know
that
there
are
things
that
you
haven't
seen
yet
and
it
may
take
time
and
we
don't
necessarily
have
time
tonight
so
I
I
don't
want
to
delay
this
because
I
think
it's
important.
We
move
forward
so
I'm,
okay,
with
putting
it
aside
for
now,
but
I'm,
just
letting
you
know
that
I
don't
know
how
many
pages
were
there
of.
A
H
And
on
that
point,
though,
yeah
I
agree:
they're,
mostly
stylistic
grammar
formatting
changes.
There
is
a
section
that
I
had
requested
about
definitions,
so
people
understand
certain
steps
that
will
happen
as
it
relates
to
this
plan
and
I.
Think
they're
important
to
include
so
I,
don't
know
if
we
want
to
wait
till
those
till
later
and
include
those
at
a
different
time.
I,
don't
know
what
that
process
looks
like,
but
so.
A
F
A
Specifically
for
this
item,
so
why
don't
we
lay
it
on
the
table
for
the
moment
and
then
see
where
we
are
moving
forward?
That
acceptable
is
a
way
to
try
to
move
forward.
Okay,
let's
vote
on
the
motion.
Please
thank
you.
I
G
L
Area
counselors,
I,
I,
don't
know
if
I
have
a
definition
off
the
top
of
my
head,
but
basically
it
means
that
we
set
it
aside
until
he'd
like
to
deal
with
it,
but
it
comes
up
again
during
the
meeting
is
the
idea?
It's
not
a
postponed
to
a
different
meeting
or
a
postponed
postpone
indefinitely
is
to
essentially
not
address
something
again
postpone
to
a
certain
date
would
be
a
specific
time
or
date.
This
is
just
to
set
it
aside
during
the
course
of
the
meeting
to
bring
it
back
up.
L
It
is
not
debatable.
It
is
a
higher
priority
of
any
the
highest
priority
of
any
subsidiary.
Emotion
get
your
definition,
but
basically
it
will.
The
idea
is
that
it
comes
up
again
during
the
meeting,
but
we're
not
ready
to
address
it
right
at
the
moment.
L
America
counselor,
you
may
have
heard
that
because
it
did
get
said,
it
is
three
pages
that
I'm
working
on.
A
O
A
As
possible
thanks,
we
have
people
here
who
want
to
address
it.
We
have
a
translation
service
to
provide
additional
language,
so
we
ought
to
try
to
make
accommodations
to
get
this
going.
Yes,
counselor.
C
City
attorney:
did
you
say
that
you
probably
wouldn't
be
able
to
get
to
all
the
change
I'm
just
worried
about
tabling
it,
and
then
we're
making
individuals
wait
longer
when
there
still
can't
be
a
vote,
because
not
all
of
the
Amendments
have
been
considered
and
so
I
don't
know.
If
we
could.
L
C
C
G
G
Yes,
sorry
I
lost
where
I
was
a
resolution,
adopting
a
strategy
for
donating
or
selling
at
below
market
value,
a
property
identified
as
Las
Estrellas
truck
6A
to
a
developer
certified
as
a
qualifying
grantee
under
the
New
Mexico,
affordable
housing
act
to
develop
Santa,
Fe
homes,
program,
homes,
low
price
dwelling
units
or
units
price
restricted
through
another,
affordable
housing,
subsidy
and
approving
an
announcement
to
sell
the
remaining
seven
Las
Estrellas
slots
with
a
local
preference
and
again
rich
brown
is
available
for
this
item.
H
A
Second,
there's
a
motion
to
approve
and
there's
a
second:
let's
go
to
Mr
Brown
to
introduce
this
and
then
we'll
have
discussion
with
the
council
members.
O
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor,
welcome
this
evening.
This
amendment
has
been
approved,
there's
only
a
couple
of
amendments
that
are
going
to
be
reviewed
tonight.
This
is
in
reference
to
our
local
preference
issue
that
we
have
with
this
sale.
This
public
notice,
sale
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
we
see
it
as
a
policy
decision
and
so
we're
ready
to
move
forward
with
this
public
notice
and
we're
ready
to
answer
any
questions
that
one
may
have
about.
The
amendment.
J
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor,
councilman,
veteriel,
councilor,
Michael,
Garcia
and
I
had
been
working
on
an
amendment,
but
it
is
quite
comparable
to
the
amendment
that
Council
Romero
worth
and
councilor
Lindell
have
proposed
so,
rather
than
potentially
wait
for
our
language,
I
think
that
it
might
just
be.
We
were
going
to
have
to
have
a
discussion
about
both
of
them
anyhow.
J
So
if
it
is
okay
with
the
co-sponsors
of
my
amendment,
I
would
think
that
we,
we
can
just
take
it
from
here
and
discuss
some
of
the
differences.
Does
that
work
for
both
of
you.
A
A
So,
there's
a
motion
on
the
floor
to
take
up
the
amendment
that
has
been
proposed
by
counselors
Romero
worth
and
Lindell.
A
That
motion
was
seconded
so
councilor
Meredith.
You
want
to
walk
us
through
this
amendment,
so
we
can
I'm
reading
it,
but
can
you
for
the
public,
who
may
not
have
it
in
front
of
them,
give
us
the
what
the
amendment
is
designed
to
do
and
how
it
would
fit
into
the
resolution.
B
Thank
you,
mayor
I
think
there
were
a
number
of
concerns
that
we're
trying
to
address
with
this
amendment.
B
One
of
them
is
the
concern
that
a
local
preference
might
be
used
to
purchase
the
property
and
then
that
new
owner
would
turn
around
and
flip
the
property,
and
so
we
are
trying
to
protect
against
that.
B
I
would
say
the
other
objectives
would
be.
We
want
to
incentivize
the
actual
development
of
the
property,
and
we
want
to
protect
against
the
property.
We
want
to
protect
against
the
local
preference
being
used.
If
someone
wants
to
buy
and
hold
the
property
and
I
I
guess
I
would
in
terms
of
how
this
works
I
might
defer
to
staff.
If
that's
okay,
because
I
think
there's
a
little
bit
more
expertise
about
how
this
would
work,
but
we
would
essentially
add
to
be
it
for
the
resolved
Clauses.
Q
Thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you.
Councilor
Romero,
worth
I
think
that
the
counselors
summed
this
up
well,
I
mean
what
we
don't
want
to
see
is
for
someone
to
purchase
this
with
a
local
preference
and
hold
it
or
turn
around
and
sell
it.
We
want
to
see
the
project
begin
and
move
forward.
So
that's
what
we
were
hoping
to
accomplish
with
this
amendment.
Thank.
A
You
and
I
think
Mr,
Brown
or
cells
are
others
who
are
there?
If
you
want
to
speak,
I
think
councilor,
mayor
worth
was
looking
for
some
technical
I.
R
Mayor
counselors,
so
the
intent
of
the
amendment
there's
two
section
of
it.
Sections
of
it
one
is
to
prevent
the
resale
within
three
years
utilizing
a
letter
of
credit
that
would
be
obtained
through
a
bank
The
Proposal
is
for
it
to
be
in
the
amount
of
two
percent
of
the
purchase
price,
so
that
letter
of
credit
after
a
purchaser
obtains
it
with
their
local
preference,
would
then
have
to
provide
a
letter
of
credit
to
the
city
so
that
they
could
draw
down
against
it
if
they
do
not
meet
the
three-year
Mark.
R
The
same
is
it's
it's
similar
in
the
next
provision,
which
is
a
five-year
provision
to
start
building
out
and
developing
either
spine
infrastructure
utility
infrastructure
engineering.
If
they
do
not
do
that
within
the
five-year
period,
there
would
also
be
another
letter
of
credit
in
the
one
percent
amount
of
the
contract
price
that
could
be
drawn
down
against
that.
F
H
Thank
you
mayor,
thank
you
to
my
colleagues
for
putting
forth
something
that
was
addressing
the
need
to
make
sure
that
local
preference
is
for
lack
of
a
better
word
sustainable,
and
so
what
I
want
to
just
understand,
because
these
terms
are
not
necessarily
terms
that
I
unders
that
I
know
of
but
the
the
property
having
it
for
three
years.
H
Can
you
say
more
about
the
this
section
that
says
the
purchase
agreement
shall
require
the
purchaser
to
secure
this
requirement
with
a
letter
of
credit
in
the
amount
of
2000
of
the
contracted
purchase
price,
two
percent.
Sorry,
what
did
I
say?
Two
thousand,
oh,
my
gosh,
two,
two
percent
of
the
contracted
purchase
price.
Can
you
explain?
Isn't
that
we've
done
this
kind
of
practice
before
correct?
Can
we
give
an
example
of
where
we've
used
this
method
mayor.
R
Councilor
Villareal,
we
use
it
often
in
our
leader
project,
so
within
our
purchase
our
project
participation
agreements.
Once
we
move
forward
with
an
ordinance,
we
have
securitization
there's
a
lot
of
different
ways
to
securitize
those
types
of
agreements,
but
one,
that's
very
simple,
is
a
letter
of
credit,
so
the
entity
obtains
a
letter
of
credit,
meaning
they
have
to
put
down
the
amount
requested
it's
held
within
the
bank.
R
The
bank
gives
us
a
note
or
a
piece
of
paper
that
says
the
city
has
the
authority
to
draw
down
if
they
don't
meet
the
provisions
of
the
agreement,
so
the
purchaser
would
have
to
do
that,
go
to
a
bank
obtain
this,
provide
it
to
the
city,
and
then
we
would
utilize
it
and
hold
it
for
the
three
plus
year
period.
If
it
you
know
a
day
after
three
years,
they
do
not
sell
it.
Then
we
would
authorize
the
release
of
that
letter
of
credit.
Same
would
go
for
the
the
next
provision.
H
Okay
and
the
other
provision
is,
is
when
the
purchase
the
purchaser
is
awarded
the
local
preference
and
they
begin
development
of
the
property,
including
spine
infrastructure,
infrastructure,
engineering
and
utility
development.
That's
within
a
five-year
period
of
completion,
and
that
note
of
that
letter
of
credit
and
the
amount
of
one
percent
is
that
a
separate
letter
that.
F
H
R
Mayor
councilor
Villareal,
that
is
correct,
they'd,
be
holding
two
letters
of
credit,
so
technically
this
could
be
a
potential
of
the
first
one.
The
two
percent
would
be
a
hundred
thousand
dollar
letter
of
credit.
The
second
one
would
be
a
fifty
thousand
dollar
letter
of
credit.
They
would
have
to
hold
the
100
000
one
for
the
three-year
period,
the
second
one,
the
five,
the
fifty
thousand
dollars
they'd-
have
to
hold
for
a
five-year
period,
and
this
is
the
the
start
of
spine
infrastructure.
So
shell
begin
development
of
the
property
of
infrastructure.
R
D
Is
there
any
reason
we
can't
include
any
purchaser,
because
this
one
solely
targets,
those
that
qualify
for
local
preference
but
I-
think
whomever
buys
this
property.
We
should
hold
everybody
accountable
to
developing
this
property
within
five
years.
Our
community
is
in
deep
need
of
Housing
and
to
only
stipulate
that
if
we
utilize
local
preference,
you've
got
to
immediately
begin
to
develop,
whereas
if
a
private
entity
not
using
local
Preference,
they
can
sit
on
it
and
and
I
think
we
should.
D
We
should
encourage
everybody,
whether
it's
local
or
non-local,
to
develop
the
spine
infrastructure
within
five
years.
So
is
that
something
that
you
all
considered.
B
Mr
American
worth
thank
you,
mayor,
I,
think
what
we're
concerned
about
is.
If
you
purchase
this
property
because
you
took
advantage
of
our
local
preference,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
one,
you
don't
flip
it
and
two
that
you
start
development.
If
you
don't
take
advantage
of
our
local
preference,
then
I
think
it's
your
prerogative.
J
J
I
I
wanted
a
longer
time
frame
and
not
being
able
to
sell
because
I
I,
you
know,
I,
don't
want
somebody
to
kind
of
wait
out
the
clock,
so
I
I
think
our
not
I
think
our
Amendment
had
a
10-year
provision
on
there
that
they
can't
flip
within
10
years
and
then
for
the
development
we
did
have
three,
although
I
do
understand
that
apparent
that
that
might
be
a
bit
of
a
small
time
frame.
J
O
Okay,
mayor
Weber,
councilor,
cassette
I
think
the
advice
that
we
gave
to
the
sponsors
was
that
the
10-year
period
I'm
sorry,
the
three-year
period,
is
first
and
foremost
the
time
where,
based
on
you
know,
economic
Cycles
one
could
or
could
not
flip
the
property,
but
on
an
infrastructure
build
side,
it's
going
to
take
more
than
three
years
to
really
get
it
going
development
financing,
getting
your
vendors
together,
starting
that
spine
infrastructure.
So
the
five
years
were
what
we
said
would
be
the
time
where
you'd
start
to
see
shovels
on
the
ground.
O
You
would
not
see
them
in
three
years.
Probably
you'd
probably
see
them
in
within
five
years,
whereas
within
three
years
you
could
flip
the
property,
because
you
could
say
I'm
going
to
wait,
see
what
the
Market's
doing
and
go
from
there,
but
for
10
years,
that's
quite
a
long
time,
because
it's
holding
capital
for
a
very
long
period
of
time.
J
Okay,
can
you
go
back
to
that
one,
though,
with
the
the
economic
cycles
and
and
why
why
three
years
feels
like
a
good
I
mean
again
I
want
to
make
sure
and
we
protect
against
flipping
yeah
and
if
three
years
is.
O
Yeah
so
I'll
give
you
an
example.
This
is
an
assumption
of
example.
Is
that
normally
recessions
take
about
18
months?
So
when
you
look
at
Capital,
that's
in
the
market
that
up
and
down
time
they
have
a
look
at
that
they
they
forecast
out.
How
long
will
that
take
so
in
a
three-year
period,
That's
about
two
recession?
Cycles?
If
one
would
happen,
so
that's
still
enough
time
for
them
to
pull
the
trigger
or
not
because
they
could
say,
I'll
make
a
sale,
then
or
not.
O
That's
why
the
three
years
was
this
was
set
out
there,
but
on
the
longer
period
of
time
for
infrastructure
in
three
years.
A
lot
of
that
would
not
happen.
There's
a
lot
of
Permitting
vendoring.
You
know
surveying
engineering.
That
needs
to
be
done.
A
lot
of
planning
needs
to
be
done.
So
that's
why
the
five
years
is
sort
of
a
I
guess,
a
medium
Mark
that
could
be
in
place
where
one
could
be
putting
shovels
in
the
ground
and
having
heavy
equipment
out
on
the
site.
J
Okay,
thank
you
so
much
one
of
the
other
differences
that
we
were
you
know
Andre
and
I
were
just
discussing
and
I
would
like
to
hear
the
opinion
of
staff,
as
essentially
the
penalty
for
for
reaching
these
Provisions
or
this
provision
for
selling
would
be
that
they
would
then
owe
the
city
the
percentage
of
the
contract
price
that
they
received
as
a
local
preference.
So
if
they
receive
three
percent,
they'd
have
to
pay
back.
J
The
city
they'd
have
to
pay
the
city,
the
three
percent
that
they
were
awarded
in
their
RFP
six
percent
and
awarded
back
in
their
FPS.
So
I'd
be
curious,
just
to
hear
from
staff
and,
of
course,
just
from
the
rest
of
the
governing
body
about
that,
as
opposed
to
the
line
of
credit
or
a
letter
of
credit.
So
if
I
could
get
some
as
Andrea
and
I
were
discussing
it's,
you
know
how
do
we
balance
both
the
Simplicity
as
well
as
trying
to
make
this
as
secure
as
possible?
R
Mayor
counselor
cassette,
so
the
real
difference
is
that
a
letter
of
credit
is
almost
an
immediate
thing,
so
you
would
be
able
to
draw
down
should
they
violate
it,
whereas
a
breach
of
an
agreement.
That
means
the
party
or
the
purchaser
would
have
to
give
you
three
or
six
percent
of
what
their
contracted
price
is.
You
might
have
to
go
to
court
file
a
breach
action.
R
Sometimes
that
doesn't
happen
automatically.
It
could
require
litigation.
So
I
think
it's
what
you
want
out
of
out
of
the
penalty.
So
do
you
want
it
immediate
or
do
you
want
something
that
might
require
some
type
of
litigation
right.
J
O
Robert
counselor
because
I
want
to
add
one
more
thing:
I
think
that
to
your
question,
so
the
the
local
preference
dollars,
the
six
percent,
the
three
percent
three
percent:
it
isn't
it's
an
inflated
number
to
your
actual
purchase
price,
so
we're
not
giving
that
money
to
anyone
we're
using
that
purchase
price.
That's
the
original
purchase
prices
where
we
start
with
that
letter
of
credit.
We
don't
add
the
six
percent
on
top
of
that
purchase
price,
because
it's
just
an
artificial
number
for
evaluation.
J
Yes,
yes,
I,
understand.
Thank
you,
though.
That's
good
clarification
and
yeah
we
also
in
in
ours,
did
not
stipulate
that
only
somebody
with
a
local
preference
would
be
subject
to
the
three
or
five
year
on
starting
development.
J
You
know,
for
me,
I
I
think
that
it's
really
important
that
we
are
selling
to
somebody
who
is
who
is
committed
to
moving
forward
with
this
development
and
to
moving
this
project
forward.
So
I
would
be
interested
on
that
provision
applying
to
all
purchasers,
because
I
think
that
you
know
we
know
this
is
a
hard
project.
J
We
know
that
this
is
going
to
be
really
challenging,
so
I
want
to
make
sure
that
people
are
coming
to
the
table
that
are
really
ready
to
do
this
work
and
to
and
to
take
this
on,
so
that
that's
my
thought
on
on
that
differentiation
there.
Thank
you
so
much
Mr
Mayor.
H
J
H
Yes,
not
just
local
preference,
so
we
talk
I
mean
you
counselor
Garcia
brought
that
up
and
I
actually
agree.
I
mean
we're
really
thinking
about
the
overall
holistic
aspect
of
this
development
of
the
property,
and
so
why?
Wouldn't
you
all?
Why
wouldn't
the
sponsors
of
this
Amendment
consider
that,
as
a
as
a
Amendment
to
the
amendment.
B
B
I,
don't
have
this
property
that
we're
talking
about
is
the
seven
tracks
that
are
very,
very
difficult
to
build
on
and
if
somebody
wants
to
to
buy
them
and
leave
them
as
open
space
I,
don't
necessarily
have
a
problem
with
that
and
I'm
I'm
curious
whether
I
mean
for
me
it
was
if
you're
going
to
take
a
local
preference
in
order
to
be
the
winner
of
purchasing.
B
You
should
be
required
to
build,
but
if
you're
not
going
to
use
that
government
enticement,
then
I
don't
want
to
get
in
the
way
of
property
rights
or
people
who
want
to
just
buy
it
to
buy
it
I
you
know
or
have
other
ideas
and
I
guess:
I,
don't
know
if
there's
any
I
mean
if
we
don't
have
the
low,
if
you
don't
use
the
local
preference,
can
we
tell
you,
you
have
to
build
in
a
certain
amount
of
time?
Is
that
legal
is
that
constitutional?
Is
that
due
process?
B
Do
we
have
that
kind
of
control
over
property
owner.
L
L
F
A
I
also
think,
let
me
interrupt
for
one
second
counselor,
then
I'll
turn
the
floor
to
you.
You
know
I'm
looking
at
at
this
application.
It
specifically
talks
about
the
local
preference
I
think
this.
These
two
Provisions
are
designed
to.
If
you
ask
the
question,
what
problem
are
we
trying
to
solve
here?
A
I
think
the
problem
we're
trying
to
solve
here
with
these
Provisions
is,
first
of
all,
to
make
sure
that
the
local
preference
doesn't
get
misused
by
someone
who
would
potentially
turn
it
into
a
profit
play
and,
secondly,
that
they
would
be
committed
to
using
the
local
preference
to
do
the
work
of
building
housing.
A
I
also
think
we
have
a
question
which
may
or
may
not
ever
come
up
of
whether
or
not
the
local
preference,
as
it's
in
this
resolution
somehow
runs
a
foul
of
the
anti-donation
clause
and
having
these
stipulated
in
the
resolution
holding
it
to
people
who
use
the
local
preference
could
help
cure
any
concern
over
the
anti-donation
clause.
A
Blowing
the
whole
thing
up.
It's
a
demonstration
that
we
are
getting
something
for
our
willingness
to
provide
the
local
preference
we're
getting
something
back
in
return,
and
that
is
not
really
a
constitutional
issue
if
it's
just
a
market
transaction,
so
I
think
the
crafting
of
this
amendment
is
very
specific
to
solving
two
very
specific
problems,
whereas
requiring
a
market
purchaser
to
build
within
a
certain
period
of
time
may
very
well
be
within
our
rights.
A
I
can't
remember
when
we've
done
something,
that's
a
land
use
case
or
we
just
voted
on
a
land
use
case
for
a
zone
change
we
didn't
say
to
the
developer:
you
have
to
build
housing
within
a
specific
amount
of
time.
Now
we
weren't
selling
them
land,
but
we
there
was
never
a
concern
that
it
was
our
governmental
responsibility
or
interest
or
power
to
say,
there's
a
clock
ticking
and
your
zone
change
doesn't
apply.
A
If
you
don't
build
your
house
right
away,
so
we're
I
think
we're
curing
a
very
specific
problem
with
these
very
specific
amendments:
councilor
Garcia,
councilor,
Lindell
and
then
councilor
Garcia.
Thank.
Q
You
mayor
I,
think
councilor
Romero
worth
brought
up
something
that
I
keep
in
the
back
of
my
mind
on
this,
the
open
space.
Someone
could
buy
this
and
just
leave
it
as
open
space,
whoever
buys
it
that
wants
to
develop
it.
Q
When
we
talk
about
housing
issues
with
this
particular
property,
these
houses
are
going
to
be
really
expensive
because
they're
going
to
be
really
expensive
to
build
I,
don't
think
anybody
that's
gone
out
there
and
looked
at
it
or
had
conversations
about
it
in
the
past
with
different
people.
These
these
will
be
very
expensive
houses.
This
is
this
is
not
the
housing
of
Workforce.
This
is
not
Workforce
housing
that
we're
talking
about
track.
Q
6A
is
affordable,
housing,
it's
a
dedication
and
that's
terrific,
but
the
rest
of
this
property
and
I
suspect
that
this
property
will
be
purchased
by.
Q
If
someone
takes
a
local
preference
on
it,
it'll
be
more
than
one
person
and
some
kind
of
Syndicate
of
people
and
it'll
be
interesting
to
see
how
they
split
up
the
lots
and
who
gets
what,
because
a
lot
of
them
are
a
vast
majority
of
them
are
very
hard
to
build
on,
and
some
of
them
are
just
all
but
impossible
to
build
on.
Somebody
will
build
on
them,
but
it
comes
at
a
cost.
Q
So
I
I
think
that
that
speaks
some
to
if
someone
were
given
the
local
preference
or
if
someone
just
purchases
it
without
the
local
preference.
Thank
you
mayor.
Thank.
D
Then
counselor
there
I
think
one
thing
to
clarify
here
is
this
is
unique
situation,
and
since
this
is
not
a
private
entity
transaction,
this
is
the
city
putting
up
its
own
property
for
sale,
which,
as
I've
I've
said
in
the
past.
This
is
an
extra
tool
in
our
tool
belt.
So
I
would
hope
that
when
we
put
this
on
the
market,
we
encourage
development.
We
encourage
homes
to
be
built
that
that's
the
priority,
we're
in
the
middle
of
a
housing,
crisis
and
and
I
know.
D
D
One
question
around
affordable
housing
for
the
seven
units.
It
still
would
apply
for
these
units,
whether
or
not
somebody
sits
on
it
or
somebody
who
works
to
develop
it.
There's
still
the
requirement
for
affordable
housing
to
be
developed
unless
they
pay.
The
fan
lieu
of
option
am
I,
correct.
R
Mayor
councilor
Garcia,
if
I
parse
out
the
question
you're
asking
whether
the
master
plan
requires
people
to
build
out
the
affordable
housing,
correct
I,
think
that
is
correct,
that
if
you
start
developing
the
residential
you
have
to
build,
you
have
to
include
the
affordable
housing.
I,
don't
know
if
there's
a
requirement
to
build
meaning
someone
could
come
forward
with
they
purchase
it
and
they
amend
the
master
plan
and
decide
hey
I'm
not
going
to
build
any
of
this
portion
or
they
could
continue
to
hold
the
master
plan
and
just
not
build
for
a
while.
D
And
I
don't
I
apologize
if
I
was
implying
that
there
is
currently
a
stipulation
that
they
have
to
build
I.
Think
that's
what
we're
debating
now
and
I
agree
this
this
property.
The
terrain
is
tough,
but
I
would
like
for
the
city
to
encourage
the
development,
and
maybe
we
double
that
for
private
owned
property
to
10
years.
You
know
we're
for
like
we're
doing
with
6A
5
years,
the
remainder
of
those
seven
Parcels
within
10
years.
There
has
to
be
this
similar
type
of
spine
infrastructure,
engineering
and
utility
development.
It's
we.
D
We
as
a
government
should
be
doing
everything
we
can
to
encourage
home
ownership
opportunities
and
Home
Development.
So
thank
you.
Mr
Mayor!
No.
A
I
Thank
you,
mayor,
Mr
Brown.
You
said
it
in
previous
meetings
and
I.
Think
tonight
too
about
the
three
percent
and
then
the
three
percent
totaling
the
six
correct.
Can
you
explain
a
little
bit
more
where
those
three
percents
came.
O
R
Mayor
councilor
Rivera,
so
there
are
two
abilities
to
get
a
three
percent
increase.
One
is
whether
you
hold
a
Santa
Fe,
County
or
city
of
Santa
Fe
business
license
for
a
period
of
three
years
or
more.
R
Sorry,
let
me
just
break
this
up,
so
there
we
go.
The
second
is,
you
can
receive
a
local
preference
if
you
provide
a
New,
Mexico,
Tax
and
Revenue
Department
resident
business
certificate,
so
you
have
to
apply
to
New
Mexico,
tax
and
rev
for
that
certificate.
Establishing
that
you
are
a
resident
business
and
that
means
you're
a
business
within
the
state.
They
have
specific
provisions
and
I
believe
you
have
to
have
paid
taxes
for
a
certain
period
of
time
to
the
state
of
New
Mexico
to
obtain
it.
I
O
Mr
mayor
council
River,
that's
true
what
it
does
is.
It
allows
your
bid
to
have
a
bonus
number
three
percent,
three
percent.
So
if
you
came
in
at
five
million
dollars,
you'd
have
six
percent
above
that,
so
that
in
the
evaluation
period
it
would
say
one
of
the
evaluation
criterias
did
you
meet
the
pros
price
Value
Plus
or
over,
and
that
would
give
you
that
six
percent,
if
you
just
came
in
at
the
appraised
price
but.
I
Then
what
this
amendment
really
does
is
take
one
of
those
references
out
of
the
way
and
converts
it
to
actual
real
money.
That
would
then
go
into
letter
of
credit
or
be
considered
a
letter
of
credit.
R
F
R
Current
Amendment,
that's
on
the
floor
talks
about
one
and
two
percent
of
the
purchase
price,
so
that
would
probably
be
equal
to
the
the
half.
If
someone
received
a
three
percent,
the
amendment
that
councilor
cassette
was
talking
about
previously
was
directly
correlating
to
the
amount
of
local
preference.
You
would
have
received
that
that's
the
amount
that
you
would
be
due
so
so
they
those
correlate.
I
R
Mayor
council
yvetta,
yes,
it
is
utilizing
the
local
preference
as
something
that
you
have
that
enforces
your
ability
or
your
requirements
to
hold
the
property
and
to
build
it
out.
Okay,.
L
A
Still
would
get
the
local
preference
and,
if
you
lose
the
local
preference,
nor
are
you
putting
losing
money.
You
are
simply
putting
in
effect
something
in
escrow
and
meeting
the
criteria
of
the
local
preference,
and
this
proposed
res
Amendment,
your
if
you
meet
them,
your
local
preference
is
all
good
and
you
get
your
your
money
isn't
lost.
So
it's
simply
a
a,
in
effect,
an
insurance
policy
that
the
local
preference
will
be
utilized
for
the
purpose
for
which
it
was
intended.
A
O
Mayor
Weber,
Council
Rivera,
keep
in
mind
that
the
local
preference
amount
is
a
paper
amount
they're,
not
actually
adding
anything
to
that
until
they
are
chosen
and
be
ready
for
disposition.
So
that's
when
the
letter
of
credit
says
that
you'd
have
to
take
three
percent
of
the
that's
the
purchase
price,
not
your
local
preference,
Price
Plus,
the
purchase
price,
it's
actually
what
the
purchase
price
would
be,
but.
O
Mr,
chair
and
Council
repair.
That's
that's
correct.
B
Yeah
and
I
was
a
little
bit
concerned
about
asking
a
local
developer
to
have
a
line
of
credit,
but,
as
we
were
talking
about
this
I
think
it
does
a
number
of
things
one
I
I
did
when
this.
When
this
idea
was
first
brought
forward
several
years
ago,
I
actually
did
get
support
from
Banks
local
banks
saying
that
they
wanted
us
to
do
this.
B
Is
you
know
one
thing
you
know
we're
I
think
we've
talked
about
the
the
it's
appraised.
Value
was
somewhere
in
the
five
million
dollar
range
and
that
the
real
challenge
in
developing
is
going
to
be
securing
the
and
we've
heard
different
numbers
and
we've
gotten
emails
about
different
numbers.
You
know
we're
saying
somewhere,
30
million
50
million
to
be
able
to
actually
put
the
infrastructure
down
in
order
to
build.
B
We've
also
talked
about
how
difficult
this
particular
piece
of
this
property:
we're
not
talking
about
the
affordable
housing
piece,
the
6A
piece,
we're
talking
about
the
seven
tracks,
how
how
difficult
that
is
to
build
on
because
of
the
terrain,
the
steepness,
the
Arroyos,
the
floodplains
and
so
to
require
these
lines
of
credit
as
our
insurance
policy
for
making
sure
that
the
local
preference
is
used
in
the
way
we
want
to
see
it
in
in.
You
know,
solving
the
the
particular
objectives
that
we're
concerned
about
I.
B
Think
if
you,
if
you,
if
you
have
the
ability
to
get
this
local
preference,
that
also
speaks
I,
think
to
your
financial
wherewithal
to
actually
do
what
we
want
to
see
done,
which
is
purchase
the
property
you
if
you're
local,
you
get
the
local
preference,
but
you
also
have
the
capacity
to
work
with
this
very
difficult
piece
of
property
and
actually
get
the
infrastructure
down
so
that
it
can
be
built
upon.
Thank
you,
mayor.
A
A
I
want
to
come
back
to
a
point
that
councilor
Garcia
made
earlier
and
I
I
think
we
ought
to
put
the
right
thing
in
the
right
place
and,
if
I
understand
correctly,
these
two,
my
pers,
my
feeling
is
these
two
amendments
are
designed
to
speak
directly
to
local
preferences,
something
we
want
to
make
sure
is
used
properly
and
also
potentially
keep
it
out
of
the
anti-donation
problem.
A
A
If
private
or
not
private
I
would
seems
to
me
that
would
something
that'd
be
more
agreeable
to
consider
to
put
into
the
terms
of
purchase
rather
than
to
embed
in
this
resolution,
particularly
because
these
two
specific
amendments
are
designed
to
cure
two
very
specific
problems,
but
there's
nothing
that
would
prevent
that
from
being
in
the
offering
papers
that
correct.
L
Remember
counselor:
do
you
there
might
be
nothing
to
prevent
staff
from
doing
that,
but
it
seems
like
it
would
be
a
good
idea
for
everybody
to
set
out
their
terms
now
so
that
you
are
agreeable
to
the
purchase
agreement
later.
Okay,
I
I
wouldn't
want
to
Spring
new
purchase
agreements,
terms
on
you
later
and
then
have
to
go
through
this
again.
A
G
E
A
A
Thank
you.
We
now
have
a
motion
as
amended
further
discussion.
H
You
mayor
I,
just
wanted
to
give
folks
more
of
a
context
of
this,
because
we
really
didn't
provide
an
introduction.
This
has
been
in
the
works
with
councilor
Garcia
and
I
for
a
while,
as
it
relates
to
Las
Estrellas
master
plan,
which
has
been
in
the
works
for
a
very
long
time,
but
in
2021
the
governing
body
adopted
a
resolution
which,
by
the
way
in
the
memo
it
says
it
was
in
2011.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
to
correct
that
that
was
March
10th
2021.
H
We
had
a
resolution
that
required
the
governing
body
to
approve
the.
What
we
have
to
do
is
a
public
announcement
of
sale
of
a
city
property
and
there
was
an
effort
by
councilwoman
sorry
vehicle
coupler,
to
try
to
include
a
local
preference,
and
there
were
a
lot
of
things
that
needed
to
be
clarified
and
just
refined,
so
counselor,
Garcia
and
I
worked
on
that
local
preference
and
then,
in
the
analysis,
with
staff,
really
looked
at
a
parcel,
specifically
6A
of
that
master
plan.
H
H
The
there
would
be
potential
for
local
or
not
folks,
to
be
able
to
provide
RFP
to
be
able
to
con
be
considered
for
affordable,
affordable
housing
in
that
area.
We
put
Provisions
in
place
in
this
resolution
that
kind
of
outlines
some
of
the
stipulations
and
some
of
the
requirements
that
that
we
were
or
the
criteria
that
we
would
look
at
for
the
affordable
housing.
So
I
just
want
folks
to
know
that
this
is
just
something
that
I
really
feel
passionate
about
and
thankful
that
my
colleagues
are
supporting
this.
H
The
local
preference
is
just
an
add-on
and
an
important
piece
to
really
trying
to
support
our
local
economy,
and
so
that's
why
I
work
very
diligently
with
my
colleague
on
this.
It
took
a
long
time
and
we
even
went
out
there
and
looked
at
the
land,
so
I
just
I
think
it's
an
important
solution.
It's
not
the
end-all
solution
for
our
affordable
housing
crisis,
but
it
is
a
potential
for
us
to
to
be
able
to
focus
in
on
something
that
we
own.
H
That
has
a
lot
of
opportunity
and
we
don't
know
what
that's
going
to
look
like.
I.
Just
think
that
there's
a
lot
of
like
I,
said
there's
this
opportunity
that
is
before
us,
and
we
wanted
to
make
sure
to
take
that
on.
So
thank
you
mayor
for
also
supporting
this,
as
we
went
along
with
this
process
and
thank
you,
councilor
Garcia,
for
all
the
work.
Thank.
K
H
Staff,
my
gosh,
we
work
so
hard
with
staff,
thank
you
so
much
to
the
attorney's
office
and
affordable
housing
office
and
just
all
the
folks
that
were
involved
with
this.
It
was
a
lot
of
work
so.
A
Q
Thank
you,
I
just
would
make
one
comment
that
in
the
future,
when
we
undertake
programs
like
this
I
would
hope
that
we
would
make
considerations
for
women-owned
businesses
and
also
veteran-owned
businesses.
I.
Don't
know
why
those
weren't
part
of
this
but
I
think
that
in
the
future,
if
we're
going
to
do
carve
outs
for
different
groups
that
those
should
be
included.
Thank
you,
mayor
officer,.
H
To
respond
to
that,
we
actually
don't
have
anything
in
place
for
local
preference.
Currently
that
focuses
in
on
women
owned
and
minority
owned
and
I've
been
actually
trying
to
work
on
that
it
was
before
the
pandemic
and
it
hasn't
come
to
fruition
yet,
but
still
something
I
want
to
work
on.
So
if
you
want
to
work
on
it
with
me,
that's
awesome.
Thank.
A
D
Just
want
to
Echo
the
comments
made
by
councilwoman
Beaver
reality.
Absolutely
thanks:
staff
director
Brown
director
Ladd
where's
attorney
Salazar
I
know
she
was
here
Terry
lease
I
mean
it
was
a.
This
was
a
big
lift
and
and
with
lots
of
brainstorming
figuring
out
how
we
can
actually
put
this
property
to
the
best
benefit
of
use
for
the
community
and.
F
D
I
think
what
we've
arrived
at
is
a
game
changer,
it's
a
game,
changer
for
affordable
housing,
it's
a
game
changer
for
our
local
developers
and
I.
Think.
Ultimately,
it's
going
to
be
a
game
changer
for
our
entire
community,
in
the
sense
that
we
we
constantly
talk
about
affordable
housing
being
on
one
part
of
town.
D
Well,
this
is
a
part
of
town
where
there's
a
potential
for
an
additional
100,
affordable
units
to
be
put
on
the
market
now
the
applications
that
come
forth
we'll
see
if
that
holds
true.
But
my
hope
is
that
we'll
meet
that
Mark
and
in
10
years,
when
we
look
back,
we
can
say
well,
look
the
affordable
housing
I
mean
the
the
local
preference
is
a
tool
that
worked
for
us
and
we
need
to
incorporate
that
in
additional
tools.
So
I
look
forward
to
seeing
how
many
applications
come
forward.
D
Utilizing
a
local
preference
and
I
agree
with
councilor
Lindell
any
other
opportunities
we
have
can
to
provide
benefit
to
local
supporters,
I'm
fully
behind
it
and
then
also
want
to
thank
the
Santa,
Fe
homebuilders,
Association
I
know
we
got
miles
in
the
back
there,
but
the
rest
of
his
team
I
think
it's
one
of
those
we.
This
is
a
situation
where
we
as
a
community
are
coming
together
to
try
to
tackle
community
challenges
and
and
it's
going
to
incorporate
and
hopefully
involve
all
factions
of
our
community.
So
so
thank
you.
A
Others,
Madam
clerk
I
think
there's
no
further
discussion.
Can
you
call
the
roll
it's
on
the
motion
as
amended.
G
Yep
as
amended
so
Council
councilor,
remember
worth
yes,
councilwomanie
barrielle,
yes,.
A
Thank
you
in
case
someone
is
here
tonight
who
thinks
we
will
be
hearing
the
South
Meadows
land
case.
That's
not
on
the
agenda.
Tonight.
That's
been,
we've
scheduled
a
a
special
meeting,
Madam
clerk.
That
meeting
will
take
place
when.
A
F
A
Is
it
time
to
reconsider,
bringing
the
Midtown
case
off
the
table.
L
Maya
Weber
counselors
I
finished
my
review
and
Jeff
Norris
has
cleaned
it
up
and
sending
it
so
I
can
sign
off
on
it,
but
we
could
look
at
I
have
a
very
redlined
version.
L
A
No,
she
says
it.
Is
there
a
second
second
okay,
we
need
to
vote
on,
bringing
it
back.
G
Okay,
yes,
come
sarcastic,
yes,
counselor
Travis,
yes,
counselor
Lee,
Garcia,.
E
A
Before
we
get
into
discussion,
can
we
get?
Did
we
already
have
a
motion
Madam
clerk
before
we
table
that
we
did
didn't?
We.
A
We're
ready
to
entertain
questions
as
and
presentation
from
staff
and
questions
from
the
governing
body
if,
if
the
City
attorney
is
still
looking
at
some
matters,
let's
go
to
Mr
Brown
first
to
give
us
the
introduction
to
this
and
then
councilor
Garcia
you,
you
and
anyone
on
the
governing
body
can
begin
to
ask
questions
and
then
we'll
look
at
these
amendments.
O
Sure,
thank
you.
Mr
Mayor
I
just
have
a
brief
preamble
to
sort
of
start.
Our
conversation
I
just
want
to
say
that
it's
been
a
lengthy
Community
engagement
process
and
the
engagement
began
in
2018.
Some
key
points
I
wanted
to
stress
is
that
this
is
not
a
regulatory
document.
This
community
development
plan,
like
the
master
plan
or
the
general
Plan
update
or
the
rezoning
this
guides
how
land
will
be
developed.
O
The
master
plan,
though,
regulates
what
will
be
developed
in
that
land,
so
this
provides
strategies
of
how
we
Implement
our
guidelines
and
engagement
from
our
community
as
we
move
forward
into
this
next
phase
of
development
at
Midtown.
So
I'm
excited
about
this
implementation
phase,
if
approved,
there's
a
lot
to
be
done
and
there's
a
lot
of
interest
in
the
Midtown
of
parcels,
and
we
are
ready
to
move
forward
based
upon
an
affirmative
vote
this
evening.
So
with
that
I'll
take
any
questions
with
my
staff.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very.
A
Much
are
there
questions
for
Mr
Brown,
counselor
Garcia.
You
have
the
floor,
sir.
A
D
You
director,
Brown
for
the
updated
fir
I,
think
there
was
a
lot
of
questions
regarding
that
and
what
put
forth
was
definitely
helpful
to
understand
kind
of
what
is
being
proposed
and
planned
over
the
next
couple
years.
D
My
one
question
clarified
question
regarding
the
fir
is
around
I
guess:
land
sales,
because
from
what
I'm
reading
there's
potentially
an
expected,
maybe
12.5
million
dollars,
I
think
10
from
Garson
2.5,
other
or
initial
land
cells
anticipated.
What
am
I
understanding.
D
Okay
and
I
guess
my
my
question
around:
that
is
the
money.
Where
does
the
money
then
come
to
once
we
sell
the
land
because
but
or
let
me
ask
let
you
answer
that
for
sure.
O
Mr
mayor
council
Garcia,
it's
a
very
good
question.
The
the
land
sale
money
comes
to
The
Economic
Development
Fund,
which
we
re
and
in
turn,
invest
in
the
parcel.
So
it
could
be
for
infrastructure.
Further
infrastructure
access
could
be
for
programming
could
be
for
looking
at
subsidies
for
any
affordable
housing
that
we
have
together.
We
worked
closely
with
the
affordable
housing
department,
so
the
money
will
come
to
The
Economic
Development
Fund,
which
will
invest
into
the
city,
mostly
through
Midtown.
D
Okay,
thank
you
for
clarifying
that
director,
Brown
and,
and
you
kind
of
touched,
that,
on
the
end
regarding
affordable
housing
and
and
I,
do
reason
why
I
bring
this
up
is
recently.
The
governing
body
is
2021.
We
passed
an
ordinance
updating
the
stipulations
when
City
owned
property
is
sold
and
we
updated
it
to
state
that
50
goes
to
economic
development,
but
then
50
goes
to
the
affordable
housing.
Trust
fund
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
doesn't
get
lost,
because
that's
that's
6.2
million
dollars
that.
F
D
Of
that
that
that's
big,
that
that's
a
huge
amount
of
money
and
then
so
my
follow-up
question
to
that
is
because
there
is
the
Midtown
link
overlay
and
in
that
ordinance
the
money
stays
within
the
overlay,
so
I.
My
question
is
based
off
these
numbers.
This
you
know
50
would
be
the
6.25
million
goes
into
affordable
housing
trust
fund
just
am
I
correct
in.
D
But
but
am
I
correct
in
understanding
that
the
6.25
million
would
be
directly
invested
into
the
into
the
per
the
Midtown
link
overlay
ordinance.
It
would
be
directly
invested
in
the
link
or
adjoining
communities,
so
it
couldn't
be
so
the
6.25
couldn't
be
spent
anywhere,
but
that
particular.
O
Community,
yes,
and
and
directly
I
can
talk
about
the
housing
side,
but
on
the
economic
development
side,
keep
in
mind
that
this
is
an
opportunity,
Zone
and
we're
trying
to
push
and
and
promote
development
inside
the
opportunity.
Zone
there
are
actually
two
of
them.
They're
ones,
north
of
the
other
or
Midtown,
is
so
it
would
stay
within
the
Midtown
area
and
the
within
the
opportunity
Zone.
O
We
could
use
it
for
spurring
all
types
of
things:
job
creation-
you
know,
development
of
other
Parcels,
et
cetera,
et
cetera,
so
it
would
stay
inside
the
Midtown
link
and
inside
Midtown,
because
one
it's
opportunity
Zone,
but
because
in
the
ordinance
it
is
for
land
within
the
link
area
and
Midtown
is
okay.
D
Thank
you,
director,
Brown
I,
didn't
know.
If
director
I
had
anything
of
this
I
didn't
okay
well!
Well,
that's
all
I
had
I
just
want
to
thank
you
comments
regarding.
We
had
some
concerns
from
the
community
regarding
the
initial
plan,
thank
you
for
taking
into
consideration
those
comments
and
feedback
and
incorporating
it
into
the
planets.
D
I
think
it's!
It's
made
the
plan
stronger.
So
so
thank
you
for
for
all
of
that,
and
thank
you
to
all
the
staff
that
went
into
putting
the
plan
together.
I
know
Daniel's
not
with
us
this
evening,
but
I
think
at
least
they
pass
along.
My
thanks
to
him
as
well,
sir.
A
Thank
you
other
other
General
comments
before
we
get
to
amendments
and
the
documents
that
the
City
attorney
is
working
through,
I
go
first
counselor,
Cass
and
then
counselor
Lindell.
J
Okay,
so
where's
Andrea,
org
Rich,
so
I
have
an
amendment
in
the
packets.
It's
a
little
bit
long,
but
I'll
go
ahead.
Shall
I
read
it
or
Andrea?
Why
don't
you
give
the
wonderful
synopsis
of
what
this
does.
R
Mayor
councilor,
cassette
governing
body,
so
the
the
community
development
plan
has,
at
the
very
end
of
the
plan,
I
think
it's
an
appendix.
Let's
see
appendix
c
c
that
has
a
listing
of
how
the
existing
buildings
will
be
utilized.
R
R
So
that's
what
it
changes
currently
as
they
exist
in
the
table
it.
It
says
that
they're
supposed
to
be
reused.
The
next
portion
of
this
amendment
is
to
change
the
term.
That's
on
the
second
page
of
appendix
C,
the
short-term
use
to
temporary
use.
R
The
third
amendment
is
to
place
under
that
short-term
use.
Demolition
use
Apartments,
A
and
B
because
they
are
currently
being
used.
Then.
The
fourth
is
also
an
appendix
C,
with
the
demolishing
no
reuse
to
remove
those
student
housing
apartments
from
that
section.
So
three
and
four
go
together.
It
would
be
removed
from
the
demolition,
no
reuse
and
put
under
the
short-term
or
temporary
use
section.
A
Thank
you.
Do
you
want
to
move
that
Amendment.
A
A
We
have
a
motion
to
add
this
amendment.
Is
there
a
discussion,
any
discussion,
Madam
clerk?
Do
you
want
to
call
the
roll
sure.
F
A
Thank
you,
councilwoman,
there's,
an
amendment
B
is
that
which
is
which
is
yours?
Do
you
want
to
take
that
up
at
this
time,.
H
Thank
you,
mayor
yeah.
If
you
refresh
Prime
gov,
you
can
see
it
now.
This
is
a
combination
of
I,
as
I
was
saying,
it's
kind
of
stylistic
grammar.
H
Some
formatting
changes
word
choices
that
I
felt
like
were
more
digestible
for
the
General
Public,
just
consistencies,
with
certain
sections
I
think
when
we
had
our
community
development
Commission
meeting
there
was
a
need
to
kind
of
clarify
processes
that
will
happen
from
this
development
plan,
which
is
a
guide
It's,
a
guiding
document.
It's
not
the
regulatory
arms.
So
there
was
a
lot
of
effort
by
staff
to
put
those
definitions
in.
However,
in
this
case,
I,
don't
think
they're
making
it
into
this
document.
H
I,
don't
know
if
there's
anything
else
that
staff,
because
I
was
really
like
cleaning
it
up
and
then
staff
added
some
of
their
own,
so
I
was
I
agreed
to
sponsor
them.
So
if
there's
anything
else
that
staff
wanted
to
add
to
the
mix
here,
do
we
have
a
motion
so.
B
L
H
H
Sure
I
would
I
know,
there's
there
may
be
some
more
and
I,
don't
know
how
we
incorporate
those
definitions
later
on,
if
we're
approving
the
document
tonight,
but
is
there
anything
Steph
wanted
to
add
to
this
before
I
make
that
motion
mayor.
R
R
So
we
couldn't
correlate
the
definitions
to
ensure
that
all
of
the
documents
that
we've
already
sent
out
and
transmitted
into
the
world
would
meet
the
definitions
that
had
been
drafted,
so
those
were
removed
to
either
be
utilized
in
another
time
or
such
terms,
like
Metropolitan
Redevelopment
area,
can
be
defined
by
the
Metropolitan
Redevelopment
Act,
DDA
or
disposition
development
agreement
is
also
defined
within
the
RFP
and
will
be
defined
also
in
those
documents.
So
those
were
some
reasons
that
we
did
remove
those
so
that
we
don't
have
complications
later
on
if
they
don't
match.
R
H
It's
up
to
you
if
you
want
to
go
through
them:
they're
they're,
replacing
certain
language
sections
they're,
not
changing
any
intentions
or
con
content
per
se.
It's
it's
really
a
cleanup!
That's
why
I
wasn't
even
sure
if
we
needed
an
amendment
sheet
like
this,
it's
really
long
and
tedious.
It
was
a
long
and
tedious
process
to
even
like
provide
all
these
to
staff
to
make
sure
that
they
were
making
those
necessary
adjustments.
So.
A
I
mean
it
seems
to
me
that
they're,
exactly
as
you
describe
them,
this
is
a
cleaning
up
of
what
your
your
categories
were:
specific
cleaning
up
the
language,
changing
the
lower
the
cases
to
the
appropriate
case,
clarifying
some
items,
I
think
you're
specifically
correct
that
there's
no
intent
changed
in
the
document.
You're,
rather
doing
a
good
job
of
editing
and
and
clarifying.
What's
already
there,
it's
a
multi-page
Amendment
sheet
and
it's
in
our
packets.
A
Q
None
of
this
is
substantive.
It
is
merely
grammar
and
writing
style,
because
I
I
can't
go
through
this
act
to
the
document
in
a
reasonable
time
frame.
Q
H
Wanted
you
all
to
see
it
beforehand?
Yeah
I
feel
like
with
my
the
edits
that
I
proposed.
It's
really
just
that
the
technical
changes
if
it
looks
like
it's
new
language,
it's
actually
just
rewriting
sections
that
didn't
make
sense
to
me,
and
so
we
just
use
language
like
I
was
saying
it
was,
was
more
digestible,
at
least
in
my
opinion.
Maybe
it's
not
for
others,
but
I,
don't
know
if
Alex
Ladd
wanted
it
Alexandra
lad,
wanted
to
add
to
that
mayor.
P
Councilor
Lindell
I
wanted
to
just
note
that
some
of
the
clarifications
of
language
came
out
of
the
conversation
with
the
Community
Development
commission.
They
did
spend
a
lot
of
time,
reading
it
and,
along
with
councilor
beatriel's
eagle
eyes
for
all
of
it,
the
grammar
and
the
inconsistencies
and
wait.
You
capitalize
this
word
over
here.
Why
isn't
it
capitalized
here
or
should
it
be
not
capitalized
either
place?
You
know
that
kind
of
detail.
P
There
were
questions
asked
by
the
committee
that
made
it
clear
by
the
commission
members
that
made
it
very
clear
that
you
know
as
we're
sort
of
buried
in
the
content.
You
know
we're
expressed
seeing
the
the
language
and
not
realizing
that
for
people
who
aren't
as
familiar
with
it,
it
sounded
confusing
in
a
couple
of
places
and
how
it
would
be
very
easy
to
just
make
it
clearer.
So
a
lot
of
the
replacement
language
isn't
replacing
what
it
said.
It's
just
making
it
say
it
better
and
more
clear.
F
Q
R
Foreign
councilor
Lindell,
so
in
exhibit
D,
which
is
methods
of
implementation.
There
are
currently
three
bullet
points,
so
methods
of
implementation
are
solicitations
and
direct
negotiations
for
arts
and
culture,
commercial
development,
Community
programming
and
planning,
Metropolitan,
Redevelopment,
Act
and
then
art
in
public
places,
which
was
strikethrough
that
that
art
and
public
places
really
isn't
a
method
of
implementation,
in
the
same
way
that
the
other
two
are,
which
is
why
it
was
removed
so
that
that's.
Q
A
Thank
you,
counselor
other
questions,
comments
about
this
packet
of
amendments
that
councilman
Villarreal
has
has
undertaken
and
I
think
undertaken
with
the
working
along
with
staff
to
clean
up
the
document.
Other
comments.
H
A
There's
a
motion
and
there's
a
I
apologize
I
thought
we'd
gotten
that
on
the
floor
earlier,
there
is
emotion
now,
if
there's
further
discussion
now
would
be
the
time
to
have
it.
I
think
about
the
specifics
within
this
amendment.
Whether
art
in
public
places
is
what
the
staff
thinks
why
that
would
not
be
appropriate
under
methods
of
implementation
or
any
other
language
that
the
governing
body
members
want
to
take
up
at
this
time.
A
I
think
most
of
it
it's
fair
to
say,
is
things
like
you
know:
why
do
we
capitalize
indigenous
here
and
not
there?
Why
do
we
say
do
the
verbs
agree
with
the
nouns
have
we
got
the
correct
abbreviations
and
so
on
other
comments,
did
you
call
the
role
man.
G
A
Very
good
we
so
we
now
have
a
main
motion
as
amended
and
other
councilman
Dell
did
you
want
the
floor?
This.
F
N
Q
I
appreciate
the
update
on
the
fir
we've
gone
from
23
or
24
million
to
17
million
I'm,
really
not
asking
any
specific
questions.
Q
I'm
just
saying
that
I
went
through
many
many
items
on
this
at
finance
and
I
I,
don't
feel
like
I
think
many
of
those
items
that
I
talked
about
deserved
much
more
time
than
just
being
in
a
document
and
we're
spending
Millions
I
mean
one
thing
on
on:
the
new
fir
is
10
million
dollars
from
Garson,
but
in
the
request
on
that,
it's
a
sale
or
a
lease.
We
don't
know
which
it's
going
to
be
and
what,
if
we
don't
get,
10
million
I
just
find
this
fir.
Q
M,
it's
just
asking
for
too
much
money
with
too
few
specifics
for
me
and
granted.
We
came
from
23
to
17
million,
but
there's
really
no
explanation
about
that
either
and
it's
just
the
number
of
issues
that
were
in
the
document.
I
mean
all
these
issues
that
have
brought
been
brought
to
us
tonight
that,
in
amendments
that
weren't
ready
to
be
heard,
I
mean
they
were
ready
on
the
part
of
the
counselor.
Q
Q
Q
There's
just
not
enough
specifics
here
for
me
to
support
this.
The
way
it
stands
I
think
many,
many
of
the
items
needed
their
own,
whether
it
be
their
own
resolution,
their
own
meeting
to
discuss
I
think
we
probably
should
have
had
a
special
meeting
to
discuss
the
entire
document.
It
it's
a
huge
amount
of
information
and
a
huge
ask
from
us,
a
huge
ask
from
the
community
and
I'm.
Not
I
can
read
those
documents
many
times
and
I
still
don't
know
exactly
what
I'm
agreeing
to
so.
Those
are
my
comments.
Mayor.
A
Thank
you,
councilor
Lee
Garcia,
sir.
You
have
the
floor.
E
Thank
you,
mayor
I
just
had
similar
questions
to
what
councilor
Michael
Garcia
had
in
regards
to
the
fir
and
in
regards
to
the
disposition
of
some
of
the
property,
and
they
were
answered,
and
so
I
don't
really
need
to
go
into
much
more
questions.
E
You
know
this
is
a
it's
a
it's
a
huge
decision
and
and
I
think
that
we
I
always
make
the
statement.
Do
it
once
and
do
it
right
and
I
really
do
hope
that,
through
the
work
of
your
department
that
we
we
do
it
right
because
I
don't
think,
there's
any
room
to
to
miss
this
one.
It's
such
a
important
piece
of
property
to
our
community
and
to
our
city
and
I'll
just
leave
it
with
that.
E
The
the
questions
that
I
had
were
answered
previously
in
so
I
appreciate
the
floor.
Thank.
H
Thank
you.
Thank
you
mayor.
After
all,
my
edits,
I
feel
better
about
this
document.
I
mean
I
feel
like
there
was
just
things
we
had
to
clean
up,
but
the
intention
of
it
I
think,
was
really
a
reflection
of
the
culmination
of
intentional
and
very
Rich
Community
engagement
processes.
H
More
than
we've
ever
had
before
and
so
I
feel
like
I've
see,
I,
see
things
in
here
that
we've
never
even
have
considered.
That
I
think
some
of
us
have
wanted
to
consider,
and
so
I
feel
I
feel
good
about
this
document,
because
it's
it's
a
it's
a
guiding
document.
It's
not
perfect.
It
doesn't
include
everything.
H
I
I
thought
it
was
interesting
in
our
conversation
with
the
Community
Development
commission
is
there
were
some
folks
that
thought
that
this
document
wasn't
didn't
do
enough,
that
it
wasn't
radical
enough,
and
then
there
were
some
folks
that
yeah
I
guess
it
felt
like
it
felt
like
it
actually
achieved
a
lot
more
than
we
ever
have
in
the
in
the
past.
So
I
just
want
to
highlight
some
sections
that
I
think
are
really
important.
H
That
I'm
excited
to
work
on,
because
some
of
these
things
will
actually
have
to
be
more
refined
in
in
a
resolution,
form
or
other
kind
of
policy
document.
So
I
think
one
thing
or
the
areas
that
I
was
really
excited
about
is
talking
about
housing,
vouchers
and
fair
housing
and
neighborhood
stabilization,
and
talking
about
what
economic
stability
could
look
like
as
it
relates
to
job
access
and
job
training
and
Career
Education,
and
the
fact
that
we
have
a
section
that
talks
about
culture
and
and
really
focuses
in
on
inclusion
and
and
diversity.
H
And
so
that's
why
I'm
supporting
this?
There
there's
also
sustainability
strategies
that
we've
talked
about,
but
they're
really
kind
of
list
them
as
potential
tools
and
so
that
that's
why
I'm
really
comfortable
with
this
guiding
doc
document.
I
know
it
wasn't
a
perfect
process
to
get
here,
and
you
know
the
financials
and
things
that
we
really
wanted
to
flesh
out.
I
feel
more
comfortable
about
the
fir
and
I
think
really
it.
H
The
details
will
be
forthcoming
in
forms
of
policy
and
resolution
and
resolutions
and
rfps,
and
so
I
think
that
that's
where
the
rubber
meets
the
road.
The
right
way
to
say
it,
the
rubber,
meets
the
road,
yeah
and
so
I
think
that
this
is
a
good
starting
place
and
I
want
to
thank
all
the
community
members
and
the
folks
that
are
in
the
audience
and
also
listening
or
not
listening
that
this
I
feel
like.
We
have
a
good
road
map
here
to
start
moving
forward
with
Midtown
and
there's
a
lot
more
to
do.
H
J
Thank
you
so
much
Mr,
Mayor,
I
I,
agree
with
what
councilman
veteriel
just
stated
and
agree
that
this
you
know
and
and
we've
we've
said
this
so
many
times
and
I-
think
it's
just
so
important
because
maybe
it
was
maybe
was
counselor
Garcia
quality
of
life
who
really
talked
about
how
you
know
this
is
Midtown,
is
going
to
be
this
continual
process
and
really
just
wanting
to
make
sure
that
the
community
is
aware
of
that,
so
that
they
do
stay
engaged
our
Midtown
engagement
Partners.
Thank
you.
J
So
much
for
all
of
the
time
and
the
work
and
the
effort
and
and
I
agree
that
this
is
this
is
a
good
document.
Is
it
perfect,
of
course,
not
there's,
probably
things
in
here
that
we
didn't
know
that
we've
missed
and
we'll
find
out
later,
but
that's
also
why
we
continue
to
look
at
Midtown
as
an
evolving
development.
J
It
is
it
is
such
an
opportunity
and
I
do
think
that
this
calls
out
and
prioritizes
a
lot
of
these
almost
experiments
that
we've
been
wanting
to
look
for,
or
we've
been
wanting
to
find
avenues
for
and
I
I
think
that
that
commitment,
that
is
shown
in
this
document
to
really
looking
at
Equity
looking
at
culture
looking
at
history
and
how
our
return
on
investment
is
not
just
Financial,
but
it
is
social.
What
Midtown
is
going
to
provide
for
this
community
what
it
could
provide
for
this
community?
J
If
we
do
it
well,
is
unmeasurable
or
immeasurable
what
is
with
us
in
words
today
we're
not
there,
but
I
I
just
really
want
to
thank
the
community.
Thank
you
so
much
to
staff
Daniel's,
not
here
tonight,
and
some
of
our
other
contractors
are
not
here
tonight,
but
but
thank
you
to
everybody
who
really
put
in
a
lot
of
this
work
and
I'm
excited
to
continue
to
work
on
it
because
midtown's
not
done
and-
and
this
is
one
that
we
will
be
continuing
to
work
on.
A
Thank
you,
others,
I
would
I
want
to
before
we
vote.
I
also
want
to
put
this
into
context.
You
know,
cities
are
living
organisms
and
they
have
to
change
and
they
have
to
adapt.
One
of
the
things
that's
happening
across
every
city
in
America
is
an
aspiration
to
make
the
community
more
involved
at
every
step
of
the
way
in
how
the
city
changes
and
to
make
sure
that
our
values
are
represented
in
the
way
we
plan
and
execute
our
projects.
A
Mr
Mr
Blair
has
a
running
gag
with
me
that
I
make
up
names.
There
actually
is
a
legendary
urban
planner
named
Norm
crumholtz,
who
was
the
planning
director
of
the
city
of
Cleveland,
and
he
is
generally
credited
with
being
the
first
city
planning
director
in
a
major
American
city
to
acknowledge
that
urban
planning
is
a
moral
activity
that
it
when
you
adopt
a
plan
you
adopt
values.
When
you
adopt
a
plan,
you
express
those
values.
This
is
a
document
which
is
the
third
leg
of
our
Midtown
stool.
There
was
the
zone
change.
A
There
was
the
master
plan.
Now
we
have
a
community
development
plan
which
lays
out
the
policies
by
which
we
will
implement
the
master
plan,
and
it
is
a
very
ambitious
statement
of
our
values.
As
has
been
said,
it
speaks
directly
to
Neighborhood
stabilization,
something
we've
talked
about.
This
actually
sets
the
stage
to
implement
it.
We've
talked
about
affordable
housing,
a
minimum
of
30
percent
of
the
housing
at
Midtown,
a
minimum,
that's
a
floor.
Not
a
ceiling
will
be
affordable.
A
There
will
be
steps
taken
so
that,
on
an
ongoing
basis,
the
programming,
the
engagement
of
the
community
that
was
so
instrumental
to
getting
us
to
where
we
are,
that
will
continue
on
an
ongoing
basis
and
I
think
it's
going
to
set
the
stage
not
only
for
what
happens
at
Midtown,
but
what
happens
in
all
of
our
activities
and
all
our
development
in
every
part
of
the
city.
I
think
this
is
a
really
strong
commitment
to
the
kind
of
City
Santa
Fe
has
been
and
will
continue
to
be
in
the
future.
A
We
will
be
attentive
to
the
needs
of
every
resident
every
as
we
follow.
The
policies
in
this
document
has
been
said.
We
couldn't
have
done
it
without
the
community
engagement,
we
couldn't
have
done
it
without
our
Consultants.
We
absolutely
could
not
have
done
it
without
staff
and
with
the
engagement
of
the
governing
body.
This
is
a
really
important
step
forward.
We
are
really
on
the
way
with
Midtown.
There
are
already
three
rfps
that
are
out
the
next
cycle
when
it
will
include
the
first
affordable
housing
efforts.
A
Q
B
F
G
F
A
Thank
you.
It's
about
ten
after
seven
I
would
entertain
a
motion
to
go
to
petitions
from
the
floor
as
a
way
to
adjust
our
agenda.
J
A
A
So,
to
be
clear,
we
are
moving
now
out
of
our
regular
order
to
petitions
from
the
floor,
because
we
have
a
standing
commitment
to
try
to
take
that
up
as
close
to
seven
o'clock
as
we
possibly
can.
If
you
are
here
for
a
matter
that
does
not
involve
a
hearing,
a
one
of
the
hearings
on
the
agenda,
the
then
please
come
up
to
the
microphone
and
I'm
sure
we
have
some
folks
on
Zoom,
potentially
who
would
like
to
participate
in
petitions
from
the
floor
again.
A
S
Good
evening,
mayor
and
city
council,
my
name
is
Alicia
Castro,
chicol
and
I
reside
in
District
One
at
619,
Baca
Street
I've
been
a
chain
breaker
member
for
about
eight
years
chain.
Breaker
is
a
member-based
economic
and
environmental
justice
organization.
We
work
to
expand
access
to
Affordable
transportation
and
sustainable
communities
for
workers
in
the
Santa
Fe
New
Mexico
region
chain.
Breaker
has
been
organizing
around
the
topic
of
Midtown.
Since
2018.
S
S
S
We
appreciate
your
vote
in
support
of
the
community
and
in
your
investment
of
time
and
resources,
there
remains
much
more
work
ahead
and
we
look
forward
to
continuing
to
engage
the
community,
protect
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
from
displacement
and
work
with
the
city
to
build
the
best
possible
outcomes
for
Midtown.
Thank
you
guys.
A
Thank
you.
Anyone
else
who
wants
to
take
advantage
of
the
petitions
from
the
floor,
that's
in
front
of
us
now
again,
if
it's
for
an
item
later
in
the
agenda,
that's
a
hearing!
Please
don't
come
up.
G
You
hear
me
Stephanie,
we
still
can't
hear
you
hold
on
one
minute.
A
If
you're
wondering
why
there's
silence
in
your
listing
or
watching
we're
trying
to
fix
a
technical
problem
so
that
someone
can,
in
the
zoom
connection,
address
the
governing
body
and
right
now
the
unmute
is
not
working.
F
F
N
Working
from
my
end,
because
I
can
see
the
little
icon
moving
I've
tested
it
I,
don't
know
what
else
to
do
to
make
it
go
through
on
your
side
and
last
night
again,
the
H
board
web
link,
Zoom
link,
did
not
work
properly
and
neither
did
the
web
webinar
ID.
F
N
G
F
T
N
You're
gonna
get
a
lot
of.
Are
you
getting
feedback?
G
N
Okay
and
I
I
just
asked
for
a
little
Indulgence
here,
because
it's
been
a
little
distressing.
Trying
to
get
through
I
sent
you
all
a
proposal
to
change
the
discussion.
Part
of
the
land
use
appeal
Provisions.
That
would
actually
allow
a
an
appellant
who
is
often
a
public
participant
who
gets
shut
out
at
that
discussion
stage
without
having
any
notice
or
ability
to
be
heard.
I
think
it's
a
long
time
coming
and
I
think
if.
F
N
F
N
A
variance
for
a
non-conforming
sign
when
there
is
an
ordinance
that
clearly
says
they
cannot
do
that
and
they
were
totally
misadvised
by
the
city,
the
attorney
staff
member
and
the
land
use.
Member
and
I've
been
asking
the
City
attorney.
What
she's
going
to
do
about
it.
So
far,
no
answer
last
night
was
really
horrible.
At
the
age
board.
We
have
one
member
who
keeps
insisting
not
for
the
first
time,
maybe
for
the
20th
or
more
time
that
he
does
not
have
to
observe
the
law
that
you
know
why.
F
N
They
can
be
creative
and
then
the
way
he
treated
the
staff
attorney
was
really
horrible
and
so
I
have
sent
you
printed
petitions
from
the
floor.
They
are
part
of
the
public
record
I'm
asking
you
to
really
look
at
this,
because
this
is
the
kind
of
thing
that
really
sows
distrust
of
the
city
and
particularly
land
use.
It
needs
to
be
cleaned
up
and
we
need
confident,
honest
people.
People
are
not
spending
hours
with
developers,
agents
to
get
development
projects
that
are,
you
know,
relatively
simple
accrued.
Thank
you.
A
Are
there
others
in
the
Zoom
area,
who
are
waiting
to
participate
with
petitions
from
the
floor.
T
A
Do
we
have
other
hands
up?
No,
no,
in
that
case,
Madam
clerk
will
go
back
to
the
regular
order
of
our
business,
which
you
should
take
us
to
the
next
item
on
the
agenda.
T
T
First
of
all,
I
want
to
highlight
for
the
council's
counselors
that
we
are
going
live
with
our
munas
upgrade
later
this
week.
The
current
version
of
the
system
is
going
to
come
down
at
five
o'clock
on
Thursday
night.
We'll
go
live
on
Friday
morning,
and
it
will
the
staff
I.T,
primarily
Finance
staff
and
HR
will
be
working
around
the
clock
over
the
weekend
to
stand
up.
T
A
significant
amount
of
training
done
across
the
city,
really
creative
and
innovative
ways
to
help
staff
come
to
really
feel
comfortable
with
the
new
system
and
I
I'm,
just
I'm
very
proud
of
everyone.
Who's
worked
on
this,
and
so
we'll
keep
you
posted
as
this
moves
forward
we'll
flag
for
you
all
at
our
last
regularly
scheduled
meeting,
you
all
approved
an
amendment
regarding
a
land
purchase
on
Richards,
Avenue,
The,
Game
and
Fish
Commission
meeting.
To
consider
that
amendment
that
you
all
approved
is
this
coming
Friday
starts
at
nine
ends
at
noon.
T
We
will
know
Friday
afternoon
or,
if
someone's
watching
live
Friday
morning,
if
they
have
accepted
the
amendment,
if
that's
the
case,
we'll
move
forward
with
a
new
purchase
price
if
they
reject
it,
there
may
be
a
need
for
us
to
call
a
special
meeting
early
the
next
week
to
take
some
action
or
for
me
to
take
some
action
as
well,
but
we'll
keep
you
posted
about
what's
coming
forward
with
that
regard,
we
will
be
announcing,
hopefully
later
this
week,
our
new
Public
Utilities
director
I,
want
to
make
it
a
point
to
thank
Jesse
roach,
our
Water
Division
director,
who
has
agreed
to
step
up
and
serve
as
the
interim
public
utility
director
he's,
really
hit
the
ground
running
and
we're
grateful
for
him
doing
this
similar
to
the
it
comment.
T
I
just
want
to
flag
I,
had
the
Good
Fortune
of
traveling
to
Washington
DC
last
week
with
mayor
Weber
to
participate
in
the
U.S
Conference
of
Mayors
winter
meeting.
T
It's
an
extraordinary
thing
to
see
Mayors
from
the
big
cities
and
their
entourages
roll
up
in
Suburbans,
with
lots
of
staff
and
small
town
Mayors
show
up
with
nobody,
and
despite
that,
it's
really
been.
It
was
really
interesting
to
see
that
what
is
affecting
Santa
Fe
is
affecting
Pensacola
is
affecting
Tulsa
is
affecting
Los
Angeles
and
the
takeaway,
which
is
sort
of
nice.
T
Sometimes,
when
you
get
out
of
Santa
Fe
or
go
to
City
Hall
is
it
really
was
a
reminder
to
to
me
and
I
think
to
the
mayor
about
the
extraordinary
work
our
staff
is
doing
and
the
great
Place
Santa
Fe
really
is
and
compared
to
a
lot
of
other
communities
in
the
country,
and
so
it
really
was
a
a
wonderful
reminder
for
me
about
the
extraordinary
work
that
our
team
is
doing
here
in
Santa
Fe
and
to
that
end,
I
just
and
then
I'll
be
done.
T
It's
just
a
sort
of
flag
that
so
many
team
members
here
at
the
city
have
been
burning
the
midnight
oil
for
months
now
relating
to
some
of
the
land
use
cases,
South
Meadows,
the
Old
Pecos
Trail
case
you
all
dealt
with
RIT
staff,
that's
around
the
clock,
trying
to
make
sure
things
work:
our
city
clerk
staff,
the
City
attorney
staff,
police,
fire
and
I'm.
Just
we've
got
a
great
team
and
I'm
just
I
just
wanted
to
say
out
loud
again
how
grateful
I
am
for
the
round-the-clock
work
that
our
team
does.
L
Counselors
I
have
not
sent
a
formal
announcement
about
this
yet,
but
some
of
you
know
that
I
think
Andrea
Salazar
has
been
recruited
to
the
state
auditor's
office
to
be
general
counsel
there.
L
L
Thank
you,
while
she's
here
still
for
all
the
work
she's
done
for
the
City
of
Santa
Fe
in
the
last
almost
four
years,
she's
been
a
huge
part
of
the
team
on
Midtown
the
rail
yard,
our
our
acquisition,
the
Santa
Fe
states,
which
now
is
the
Los
estrellos
project
that
was
discussed
earlier
tonight
on
all
the
leader
projects,
while
she's
been
here
Ida's
and
numerous
other
Economic
Development
Asset
Management
arts
and
culture
matters
and
community
services.
L
So
in
relation
to
homelessness
and
all
those
projects,
Library
Rec
facilities,
she's
been
a
key
member
on
our
team,
so
we're
gonna
miss
her,
but
congratulations.
Andrea
and
I
will
have
various
send-offs
for
her
in
the
next
week
or
so.
But
I
did
want
to
publicly
acknowledge
that
and
we're
sad
to
see
her
go,
but
we
know
she's
going
to
be
having
a
very
important
Statewide
role,
working
with
all
the
local
governments
of
the
state
and
all
the
state
agencies
of
the
state
and
all
the
universities
of
the
state,
many
agencies.
I
G
A
A
Maybe
so,
if
you're
waiting
for
something
we'll
be
back
as
quickly
as
we
can
and
and
we'll
then
take
up
matters
as
rapidly
as
possible.
Thank
you.