►
From YouTube: Governing Body - Special Meeting at 4:30
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
D
B
We
are
gonna
proceed
with
our
usual
order
of
business,
where
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance
led
by
councilor
Romero
Worth's
a
salute
to
the
new
mexico
flag,
led
by
councilor
Rivera,
newly
hair
cutted
and
a
invocation
from
councilor
Abeyta,
also
newly
sure.
So,
if
we
could
all
rise
for
the
Pledge,
the
salute
and
the
invocation.
F
The
Lord
is
my
shepherd:
I
shall
not
want.
He
maketh
me
to
lie
down
in
green
pastures.
He
did
it
me
beside
the
still
waters.
He
started
my
soul.
He
leadeth
me
in
the
paths
of
righteousness
for
his
name's
sake.
Yea,
though
I
walk
through
the
valley
of
the
shadow
of
death
I
will
fear
no
evil
for
thou
art
with
me
thy
rod
and
thy
staff.
They
comfort
me
that
prepares
the
table
before
me
in
the
presence
of
mine
enemies.
B
C
B
B
G
G
E
H
B
I
D
J
C
I
B
K
Mr.
mayor,
thank
you
City
Council.
Thank
you
for
your
time,
I
think.
Just
as
a
follow-up
I
know,
we've
been
speaking
on
multiple
occasions
on
the
wastewater
treatment
plant
and
our
ability
to
treat
treated
effluent.
So
what
we're
at
today
the
plant
was
able
to
come
back
into
compliance
Sunday
the
reuse,
customers
were
contacted
and
we
began
Reed
providing
that
water
back
to
them
again.
K
Just
take
a
second
to
highlight
kind
of
a
sequence
of
events
between
an
the
discharge
permit
from
the
EPA
that
the
which
has
taken
the
facility
down
at
path
of
targeting
nutrient
removal.
They
completed
a
nutrient
study
which
also
led
to
an
to
a
direction
for
an
aeration
upgrade
that
staff
has
been
working
on
they've,
been
before
you
multiple
times.
Over
the
past
year
we
had
long
lead
times
on
equipment.
They
were
asking
for
pre-approval
for
pre-purchase,
that
they've
been
executing.
K
So
I
would
say:
beware
at
now.
I
would
say
probably
bout
90%
of
the
recommendations
through
the
aeration
project
and
enemy
D
consultant
and
our
staff
about
90%
in
agreement
with
what
the
next
steps
mean,
they're
still
working
through
the
remainder
of
the
details
to
really
get
a
good,
solid
plan
of
what
this
means
for
us
long
term
I'm.
In
addition,
as
it
goes
to
reuse,
we
continue
to
work
on
continuing
to
work
on
adding
robustness
to
that
system.
K
K
Our
mechanical
contractors
help
us
to
get
that
system.
Revitalized
I'm
at
a
chance
to
meet
with
some
of
our
internal
experts
last
week
to
look
at
the
pipeline,
the
air
valves
giving
all
the
drawings
together.
So
so
we're
continuing
to
push
hard
on
that
and
but
I
think.
The
reason
that
we're
here
today
is
is
they're
still,
in
my
opinion,
that
there
is,
there
is
going
to
be
upsets
at
the
wastewater
treatment
plant
that
will
disrupt
the
treated
effluent
delivery.
K
There
is
on-site
storage
on
a
majority
of
these
reuse
customers,
but
if
the
duration
exceeds
the
amount
of
storage,
it
really
becomes
problematic,
and
we
do
hear
about
that
so
Ranelagh,
even
though
we're
continue
to
work
both
short
and
mid
and
long
term
plans,
I
think
consideration.
You
know
consideration
to
to
use
in
potable
water
very
similar
to
the
exercise
we
went
through
last
year
around
the
fourth
of
July
becomes
a
reality
for
us,
and
so
that's
the
reason
we
call
together
this
governing
bodies.
That's
a
compliance.
K
As
of
now
apologize
for
that,
the
the
ability
to
put
potable
water
on
these
on
this
turf
irrigation
in
order
to
save
that
is
a
reality
for
us,
an
immediate
and
that's.
Why
we're
here
tonight
so
I'm
going
to
say
that's
the
informational
update
that
I
do
have
more
than
happy
to
stand
for
any
questions
as
we
move
into
the
discussion
of
what
of
what
the
desire
the
governing
body
is.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
You
Shannon,
if
I
understand,
let
me
see
if
I
can
repeat
what
you
said
so
I'm
not
confused
as
to
the
situation
on
the
ground.
At
the
moment,
we
originally
scheduled
this
meeting
to
vote
on
whether
or
not
to
sell
potable
water
to
the
Country
Club
and
to
provide
it
to
MRC.
That
is
no
longer
a
relevant
vote,
because
the
water
is
now
at
the
moment
flowing,
but
what
we
want
to
talk
about
is
future
contingencies.
So
perhaps
we
don't
have
to
have
emergency
meetings
like
this
in
the
future.
Is
that
summarizing
the
situation?
K
B
I
just
wanted
to
in
case
people
are
tuning
in
and
haven't
got
a
clear
framework
within
which
to
put
this
discussion.
It's
not
that
the
water
isn't
flowing
now,
but
we
want
to
try
to
have
a
future
trigger
or
a
set
of
protocols.
That
would
guide
us
in
case
this
or
when
the
when
and
if
this
happens
again.
All
right
with
that
as
a
kind
of
an
opening
comment
from
our
director
are
there
particular
questions
or
comments
that
members
of
the
governing
body
would
like
to
either
put
out
for
discussion
or
address
to
mr.
Jones.
F
K
K
K
Now
at
that
point,
non
potable
water
to
their
site.
That
was
never
really
behind
science,
one
we
weren't
able
to
put
the
amount
of
flow
into
the
into
the
wet.
Well
that
would
meet
their
demand
and
their
pump
had
to
be
throttled
and
monitored,
24/7
to
balance
the
water,
so
one
that
the
pump
didn't
run
dry
or
that
the
well
well
did
not
flow.
So
we
never
really
get
that
down
to
an
exact
science.
I've
been
working
with
my
staff.
There
was
a
preliminary
look
at
how
to
extend
potable
water
to
that
site.
K
I
was
on
site
again
today
with
our
engineering
supervisor
and
the
water
division
director,
looking
at
every
possibly
we're
looking
at
every
angle
possible
of
not
just
how
we
get
it
there,
but
how
can
we
do
it
consistently,
efficiently
and
I'm?
Also
in
talk
with
Santa
Fe
County
utility,
I'm,
keeping
them
apprised
of
the
situation,
because
Marty
Sanchez
does
reside
in
their
service
area
and
really
the
water
that
we're
trying
to
target.
F
K
Right
sue,
so
we
know
that
we
stumble
through
one
time
at
the
wastewater
treatment
plant.
My
right
now,
my
hope
would
be
as
if
I
had
to
do
it
now,
then
I
would
scramble
city
crews
to
install
a
fire
hydrant
somewhere
along
that
system.
Let
me
have
to
use
a
water
truck
to
create
an
air
gap.
A
lot
of
these
are
little
unknowns
if
we
make
up
on
the
way
we're
trying
to
get
the
answers
now.
But
if,
if
push
come
to
shove,
if
the
treatment
plant
had
to
come
back
on,
these
would
be.
K
This
was
the
path
that
I
was
on.
In
order
to
do
that,
we
did
call
for
locates
there
in
front
of
the
Marty
centers,
Golf,
Course,
so
I
know,
there's
flags
and
paint
all
over
the
place,
because
I
need
to
know
where
the
other
utilities
are
we're
just
trying
to
get
as
many
details
as
possible
right
now.
K
My
current
thinking,
the
best
approach
to
providing
water,
would
be
to
install
a
fire
hydrant
on
on
the
MRC's
treated
effluent
line
and
if
there's
a
way
to
jump
or
potable
water
into
that
system
and
use
their
current
infrastructure
anywhere,
I
can
move
away
from
using
fire.
Hose
I
eliminate
friction
line,
loss
anytime
water
moves
through
a
fire
hose,
it
loses.
K
It
loses
volume
because
it's
restricted
and
that's
the
challenge
we
come
up
to
when
you're
talking
about
providing
a
significant
amount
of
water,
you're
restrained
by
that
system
and
so
I'm
trying
to
find
the
most
efficient
way
to
get
that
water
transferred
over.
So
I
don't
lose
that
MA
I
don't
occur
that
loss
through
the
system
and
I
can
maximize
the
delivery
and.
F
So
is
this
something,
even
though
we're
able
to
get
F
treated
effluent
there
now?
Is
this
something
you'll
continue
to
work
on
in
case
the
system
goes
down
in
a
month
or
two
or
a
week
or
two
weeks,
or
is
it
just
something
that
it's
not
worth
doing
as
long
as
we
have
treated
effluent
going
there
in
case
of
emergency,
will
scramble
in
and
do
what
we've
got
to
do
it.
A
K
All
right,
mr.
mayor
council,
the
Country
Club
well,
is
inside
the
city
limits.
There
is
water
infrastructure
that
runs
to
their
property
and
there
is
a
fire
hydrant
located
right
at
the
corner
of
their
property
on
Airport
Road.
So
last
year,
this
was
the
point
of
access
that
we
use
to
provide
them.
Potable
water
I
think
that
system
worked
relatively
well
I
think
from
a
utility
perspective,
having
the
infrastructure
there
and
being
able
to
put
a
meter
definitely
has
an
advantage.
K
In
order
to
do
it,
we
we
provide
the
potable
water.
We
provide
the
meter
and
then,
and
then
they
have
the
means
to
get
it
into
the
system
for
Marty
centers
golf
course.
That
would
be
our
tent
as
well
that
we
would
equip
and
work
with
with
Pat
and
his
team
there.
We
would
have
a
point
of
delivery
to
put
a
meter
and
then
they
would
convey
the
water
into
their
system.
My
personal
recommendation
would
be
for
Santa
Country
Club.
K
A
K
Cuz,
we're
gonna
saw
was
again
on
site
looking
at
it.
I
am
having
to
get
educated
on
the
infrastructure
in
that
campus
I
met
with
Pat
earlier
this
week.
He
did
point
out.
There
is
a
fire
hydrant,
but
it
comes
off
the
non
potable
water,
and
so
when
the
treated
effluent
is
moving,
that
line
is
pressurized.
The
pond
is
full
tore
up.
That's
when
we
believe
that
that
hydrant
is
charged.
If
the
treated
effluent
line
is
down,
we
believe
that
hydrant
is
no
longer.
A
A
All
right
so
we're
you
know
we
have
some
of
the
strictest
restrictions,
water
restrictions
around
and
clearly
you
know
we
don't
allow
people
to
wash
cars
in
their
driveways
etc,
when
we
allowed
the
country-club,
for
instance,
to
tap
into
the
hydrate
and
then
fill
up
their
ponds
and
use
that
that
creates
some
issues
with
my
constituents
with
regards
to
any
kind
of
water
restriction.
So
that's
some
of
the
concerns
I
have
the
other
one
was
you
know
when
last
Campanas
was
asking
for
drinking
water
to
water.
A
K
K
Think
that's
why
one
of
the
main
talking
points
about
going
to
potable
water
is
well
who's
paying
for
it,
because
there
is
a
cost
behind
that
treatment,
even
bringing
Rio
Grande
water
back
into
the
equation
right
if
it
was
untreated
raw
river
water,
that
has
the
potential
to
meet
the
drinking
water
demands
of
the
city.
We
just
haven't
agreed
that
cost
of
treatment,
yeah
so
I
think
with
with
treated
effluent.
K
If
we,
if
direct
potable
reuse,
was
on
the
table
treated
effluent,
what
be
a
drinking
water
source
right,
it
just
hasn't
been
treated
and
we
haven't
occurred
that
cost
so
I
think
made
the
main
discussion
around.
Should
we
put
water
or
not
is
is
as
if
is
it
financially
feasible,
I
think
in
our
water
portfolio,
you're
right.
If
we
were
in
a
drought
and
we
did
not
have
water
organized
where
the
water
went,
drinking
water,
fire
protection,
sanitation
wouldn't
be,
would
be
the
main
drivers.
I
just
I
would
like
for
look
I.
K
K
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
councilor.
So
even
even
when
I
read
to
the
articles
of
the
papers,
they
try
to
do
the
stasi.
Things
like
the
wastewater
treatment
plant
is
shut
down.
I'm
telling
you
the
wastewater
treatment
plant
does
not
shut
down
right.
The
water
comes
in.
They
treat
it
if
it's
out
of
compliance
that
water
still
goes
still
goes
out.
They
deal
with
enemy
D
that
deal
with
EPA.
They
take
all
the
right
measures,
but
the
flow
the
flow
continues.
K
The
treated
effluent
users
is
under
a
discharge
permit
from
enemy
D
and
when
we
stop
delivering
treated
effluent,
all
of
the
water
still
goes
into
the
Santa
Fe
River
were
only
challenged
with
dealing
with
notifications
and
the
conditions
of
the
NPDES
permit,
because
we
didn't
deliver
the
water.
We
did
not
violate
the
discharge
permit
through
the
enemy
D.
If
we
were
to
turn
on
those
pumps
and
irrigate,
that's
where
we
would
get
into
that
potential
again,
because
we're
leveraging
every
possible
aspect.
K
I
know
both
wastewater
and
the
Parks
Department
reached
out
to
enemy
D,
potentially
for
and
did
receive
a
temporary
permit
for
a
Class,
B
Class
B
effluent
to
irrigate
turfs.
So
those
that
permit
is
a
little
less
stringent
and
really
the
intent
is
that
if
we
were
able
to
pick
up
a
couple
of
days
before
after
on
the
tell
of
an
upset
that
we
could
still
hear
heat
under
Class
B,
so
the
state
did
issue
those
temporary
permits
and
the
conditions
of
those
permits.
K
Fortunately,
to
this
point,
we
have
not
had
to
exercise
those
temporary
permits.
We
came
back
into
compliance,
full
compliance
and
we
work
under
our
current
long-term
district
permits,
but
downstream
users,
when
they
treated
fluent,
turns
off
their
flow
increases.
Well,
when
the
reuse,
when
we
divert
to
take
it
to
a
golf
course,
that's
when
they
see
the
impact
on
the
river.
K
K
Counsel
right
now,
I,
like
I've,
been
communicating
the
rule
of
thumb
is,
is
having
ten
days
on
storage,
I,
think
10
days
for
each
facility.
It
may
impact
how
they
irrigate
and
it
seems
like
typically
when
the
golf
courses
feel
this
is
gonna,
be
a
long
duration.
They
do
begin
to
focus
their
irrigation
on
the
greens
that
are
more
susceptible
to
early
early
damage,
not
as
what
may
be
old
robust
as
as
the
fairways
are
the
rough
but
ultimately
having
them
manage
to
storage,
I.
Think
coming
out
of
an
event
like
where
we
are
today.
K
We
just
came
on
back
in
the
service
on
Sunday,
so
I
know
they're
looking
to
here,
gait
and
recover
from
from
that
being
out,
and
it
does
take
them
time
to
recoup
their
their
storage.
What
I
would
like
to
think
is
that
we
remain
in
compliance.
We
continue
to
provide
the
service
and
they're
able
to
fill
up
all
of
their
on-site
storage
before
we
go
into
the
next
event.
If
that
is
the
case
and
they're
in
a
good
place
on
storage,
then
it
is
I.
A
Alright,
so
I
had
spoken
to
Jarrell
about
sponsoring
a
resolution
that
called
for
that
10-day
window.
That
would
basically
leave
it
open
so
that
if
this
happened
and
we
were
out
of
compliance
for
ten
days,
you
would
have
to
keep
asking
us
for
permission
to
do
this.
It
would
just
kick
in
automatically
Marco's.
Are
there
any
issues
with
the
living
river
ordinance?
If
we
decided
to
do
that,
we
were
in
a
drought,
condition.
J
Well,
the
city
code
addresses
or
sets
out
two
stages
for
drought,
and
it
has
different
levels
of
restrictions
for
each
stage,
and
so
the
living
river
ordinances
may
be
suspended
in
the
case
of
an
orange
level
water
restriction
and
they
must
be
suspended
in
the
event
of
a
red
level
restriction.
We
haven't
had
reason
to
go
into
either
of
those
drought
restrictions,
since
that
ordinance
was
passed,
but
it's
there
and
it
provides
a
process
in
the
code
right
now.
J
In
the
case
of
a
red
level,
drought
I,
don't
believe
the
sale
of
potable
water
is
permitted
and
I.
Don't
think
the
resolution
would
trump
the
ordinance
in
that
instance.
In
the
case
of
an
orange
level,
drought
or
staged
orange
drought,
I
think
the
water
division
would
have
to
figure
out
how
much
water
is
available
and
what
priorities
the
city
has
for
allocating
that
water.
A
B
I
Thank
you,
I'm
Shannon,
I
I
commend
you
for
getting
this
done,
and
you
know
all
back
in
last
Sunday
and
also
give
thanks
to
the
employees
who
worked
really
hard
on
this
I'm
sure
they
spent
a
lot
of
time
trying
to
get
everything
working
again.
So
I
appreciate
that
very
much
I
just
have
some
couple
of
questions
on
something
you
said
you
said
and
I
was
trying
to
take
notes.
So
forgive
me
90%.
I
K
Mr.
mayor
Councillor
via
copy-
thank
you.
Yes,
let
me
clarify
that
so
so,
even
in
the
last
media
night,
I
kind
of
verbalize,
like
some
of
the
challenges
I
was,
was
directed
mostly
towards
Ephraim
Morales,
our
plant
superintendent,
where
we're
pulling
him
in
right,
nine
different
directions,
a
lot
of
different
ways
to
this
be
addressed,
and
so,
ultimately,
what
he
had
was
a
a
nutrient
study
right
that
was
given
to
him
about
how
to
comply
with
new
trim
removals.
K
Ds
consultant,
really
hammering
through
all
of
the
recommendations,
they're
takin
their
knowledge
and
their
perspective
into
account
and
out
of
all
of
these
different
things
that
were
put
on
the
table,
I
was
saying
that
I
think
about
about
90%
of
the
thought
process
and
the
recommendations
across
those
individuals
are
coming
into
like
into
agreement.
So
so
all
the
different
ways.
K
I
need
I
need
Efrain,
really
to
take
the
lead
for
me
as
the
superintendent
I'm,
giving
them
the
resources
it
needs
to
be
his
decision,
but
it
is
nice
when
you
have
engineers
and
your
environmental
consultants,
and
everybody
is
in
agreement
that
this
is
the
right
thing
to
do.
I
think
how
built
is
is
confidence
and
it
supports
his
decisions
and
so
the
90
percent.
K
What
I've
seen
is
about
90%
in
agreement
and
what
our
path
forward
looks
for
and
we're
just
working
through
a
few
of
the
minor
details
of
really
has
to
do
with
right.
What
are
the
concentrations,
how
much
food
to
organism
balance?
What
full
should
the
basin's
be
at,
and
so
they're
just
finalizing
a
few
of
those
continuing
to
hash
out
around
the
roundtable
discussions
about
what
is
our
plan
forward
to
get
to
get
us
back
on
track
to
be
more
dependable.
I
Okay,
for
that
and
then
the
only
other
thing
and
I
won't
ask
you
to
take
the
time
but
I'm
very
interested.
You
meant
also
strategies
and
long-term
planning
and
I.
Think
that's
something
that
that
is
always
important
and
I'm
glad
to
know
that
the
door
group
is
working
and
hopefully
the
things
that
you
all
accomplished.
To
that
end
will
a
difference
in
in
you
know,
just
being
these
kinds
of
situations
come
up
that
affect
our
other
client
base,
even
if
our
client
base
is
Colonel.
So
thanks
thanks
so
much
your
efforts.
I
L
Much
thank
you.
Thank
you
to
my
fellow
counselors
for
asking
a
lot
of
these
questions,
especially
counselor
Rivera
I
was
very
concerned
about
the
issues
of
what
would
happen
in
drought
as
well.
So
thank
you
for
bringing
that
up.
Shannon
I'm
just
curious.
How
do
we
water
our
other
parks,
so
Rago,
Fort,
Marcy,
general
I,
are
frankly
miles.
What
are
the
systems
that
we
use
for
those.
K
L
K
Counselor,
so
we,
the
city,
does
charge
for
treated
effluent
generally,
it
is
it's.
It's
late,
I
know
ordinance,
it
is
half
this
half
price
of
whatever
potable
water
is
so
currently.
Potable
water
is
6:06,
six
dollars
and
six
cents
per
thousand,
which
sets
the
price
of
treated
effluent
at
three
dollars
and
three
cents
per
thousand
the
the
and
so
not
all
of
our
customers
are.
If
there's
a
direct
benefit
to
the
city,
the
governing
body
has
taken
latitude
to
to
waive
those
costs,
so,
for
example,
so
the
country-club
does
not
pay
for
treated
effluent.
K
The
conditions
of
that
agreement
has
to
be
that
the
the
golf
course
has
to
be
open
to
the
public,
so
it
is
not
a
private
club
public
can
can
use
that.
What
creates
that
benefit
is
the
fact
that
the
city
give
them
the
treated
effluent
Marty,
since
they
do
not
pay
for
treated
effluent.
Contractors
do
the
Downs
the
Downs
pay
for
a
portion
of
treated
effluent.
K
There
is
what
they
call
the
inner
field,
which
they
have
historically
allowed
youth
soccer
leagues
to
utilize
those
fields
and
then,
therefore,
the
city
does
not
charge
them
for
treated
effluent
on
the
inner
field,
for
example.
So
each
one
is
a
little
bit
different,
but
there
is
a
price
for
treated
effluent
and
unless
there's
a
benefit
or
a
direction
from
the
governing
body,
then
those
prices
are
charged.
That.
L
K
Councilor
Sanchez,
yes,
there
is
so
I
would
say:
one
is
contractors,
so
contractors
are
required
to
use
treated
effluent
for
dust
control
and
compaction,
and
so
they
use
the
fill
site
there.
When
we
shut
down
the
treated
effluent,
we
have
to
redirect
those
to
the
county's
field
station,
which
is
potable
water.
Currently
and
I
know
it's
it's
a
little
bit
more
expensive
and
and
and
they
definitely
in
the
county,
definitely
experiences
the
back
up
of
contractors.
It
is
typical
for
a
right,
four
or
five
trucks
to
be
lined
up
for
water.
K
The
while
the
other,
so
we
do
have
other
agreements
in
place,
I
believe
some
of
the
other
readers
have
an
alternative
source
of
water.
So
whether
the
treated
effluent
is
a
preference
or
a
backup
or
where
they
just
haven't
been
irrigating
I
did
hear
that
the
downs
were
looking
to
that
they
were
commissioning
going
through
their
pumps,
so
they
had
drawn
a
little
bit
of
water.
We
just
we
just
haven't
since
the
urgency
and
I
think
that's
what
drives
the
conversation
around.
The
golf
course
specifically
around
city-owned
assets
right.
L
M
K
Mr.
mayor
council,
in
tell
me,
let
me
try
to
go
through
those
the
secondary
clarifiers
on
in
the
work
that
needs
to
be
done
on
them,
that
contract
for
equipment
don't
do
at
vola
is
going
s
coming
into
the
council
approval
process,
so
that
is
starting
to
show
up
on
agendas.
I
think
that
is
a
public
work,
public
utilities
monday
to
purchase
the
equipment
from
evoke
wa,
the
aeration
basin.
K
So
ultimately,
there
is
a
broken
valve
and
the
basin
that
has
to
be
repaired
and
the
basin
has
to
be
drained
so
right
now,
the
RMC
I
the
contractor
that
we're
recommending
to
do
the
aeration
upgrade
that
is
also
coming
forth.
I
believe
it
is
also
on
the
agenda
for
Monday's
public
works,
Public,
Utilities,
Committee
meeting,
and
that's
also
the
project
that
we've
been
pre
purchasing
equipment
for
so
we're
continuing
to
work
on
having
equipment
available
when
the
contractor
starts
work,
and
that
is
anticipated
to
happen.
K
The
summer
doing
the
work
and
aeration
basin,
as
I
tried
to
Lou
to,
and
one
of
our
conversations
is
and
that
I
need
to
do
the
work
on
the
aeration
basin
and
the
dis
summer,
so
that
that
Basin
can
be
brought
back
on
for
the
winter.
When
the
organisms
become
begin
to
move,
slow,
I
need
more
organisms
and
then
the
following
summer
we
would
take
down
the
other
aeration
Basin
and
make
those
repairs.
The
work
on
the
disc
filters
was
was
an
amendment
through
alpha
Southwest.
K
M
K
K
K
So
as
far
as
compliance
I
know,
my
staff
has
continued
to
work
on
that.
As
far
as
the
conditions
of
the
DP
289
for
irrigation,
we
did
come
into
compliance.
We're
still
waiting
on
some
lab
results
to
look
at
the
nutrients
for
both
total
fat
first
and
total
nitrogen,
which
will
tell
us
that
either
we're
in
a
hundred
percent
compliance
with
those
are
whether
we're
still
exceeding
on
one
of
those
nutrients
and
again
I'm.
Just
we
didn't
elaborate
ult's,
which
I
expect
to
have
within
at
least
the
next
couple
days.
K
Councilman
Dell
I
do
not
believe
that
the
facility
is
ever
operated
at
13
million
gallons
per
day
now
again,
when
the
facility,
all
right
so
again,
when
you
look
at
our
NPDES
permit,
it
does
lay
out
1313
million
gallons
per
day
is
what
the
plan
is
designed
to
do.
When
you
look
at
the
concentration
and
loadings
for
things
like
bio
oxygen,
demand
and
total
suspended
solids,
those
parameters
are
calculated,
I
believe
at
8
million
gallons
per
day.
That's
how
they
come
up
with
the
loadings.
K
M
K
Right
so
mr.
mayor
council,
until
thank
you
very
much,
I
can
see
where
the
math
goes
on,
that
that's
so
so
I'm
gonna
backpedal
just
a
couple
steps.
So,
even
though
we
do
call
it
wastewater
treatment
really,
what
that
facility
is
doing
is
treating
solids
right.
Its
job
is
to
take
solids
out
of
the
water,
and
so
when
we
look
at
loading
and
hydraulic
capacities,
when
we
talk
about
5.6
MGD
flowing
in
a
design
capacity
of
13
million
gallons
peaking
at
9m
Gd.
K
K
Is
because
the
solids
concentration,
the
amount
of
solids
has
not
decreased
with
with
conservation
it's
increased,
so
our
ability
to
handle
the
solids
that
are
coming
in
is
is
the
challenge
that
we
have
and
at
the
end
of
the
day,
even
though
we
talk
about
being
out
of
compliance
with
water
flowing
out
of
the
facility,
nobody
has
an
issue
with
the
water
flowing
out
of
the
facility
right.
It's
the
amount
of
solids
that
remain
in
the
water
that
creates
the
problem.
That
is
why
we
invested
15
million
dollars
in
anaerobic
digesters
right.
K
That's
why,
in
the
aeration
is
targeting
solids
reduction
and
what
I
talked
about
last
time.
I
said
it
didn't
matter.
If
we
had
30
polishing
filters
right,
which
was
polish,
the
water,
if
you're
not
removing
the
solids
out
in
your
secondary
process,
it
doesn't
matter
how
many
filters
you
have.
You
have
to
get
the
solids
out.
So
then,
really
to
answer
you
see
we're
going
with
with
it
is
our
ability
to
process
solids
that
are
taken
out
of
the
water
is
where
we're
investing
our
emphasis
and
the
more
solids
we
get
out
of
the
water?
K
Mr.
mayor
comes
from
arrow
worth,
so
it
wouldn't
change
the
fools
coming
into
the
facility,
so
all
of
the
treatment
processes
that
that
I
described
those
still
work
the
same.
What
were
your
float
about
his
into
pipe?
So,
instead
of
flowing
out
the
effluent
channel
into
the
Santa
Fe
River
San,
Juan,
Chama
water
would
be
diverted,
but
it
would
still
be.
It
was
still
if
the
hydraulic
wouldn't
have
changed
through
the
facility
where
it
would
affect.
K
You
is
in
your
permanent
limits
on
loading
loading
on
the
Santa
Fe
River
is
how
many
pounds
that
are
that
are
placed
in
there
and
if
you
divert
half
the
water,
you
only
apply
it
half
the
pounds,
so
you
would
very
easily
come
into
compliance
on
your
pounds.
Loading
right,
the
loading
portion
of
your
permit,
the
concentration
portion
of
the
permit,
doesn't
change
and
they
also
have
to
comply
with
that,
meaning
even
at
11
reduce
volume.
K
You
still
have
to
have
a
certain
clarity
in
that
water
and
and
we've
yet
to
be
able
to
get
the
state
to
convince
that
loading
is,
is
the
challenge
in
what
impairs
the
river
but
the
true.
The
returned
full
pipeline
would
reduce
your
load
into
the
Santa
Fe
River,
but
not
your
hydraulics
of
the
facility.
B
In
the
event,
this
happens
again,
I
wonder
if
you
could
break
down
to
the
best
of
your
ability-
and
maybe
it
has
to
happen
later-
the
costs
above
water
itself
to
the
liver
to
our
commercial
customers.
I'm,
not
talking
about
internal
customers
talking
about
other
customers,
if
there,
if
we
were
to
create
a
trigger
mechanism,
so
that
this
happens
in
the
future
and
we
have
pre-prepared
to
respond
with
drinking
water.
Are
there
additional
costs
to
setting
that
system
up
that
go
beyond
the
three
dollars
and
three
cent
cost
of
the
water
itself?
B
And
could
you
break
those
down
force
and
are
those
costs
that
the
city
would
eat
as
a
price
of
doing
business
with
our
customers?
Or
would
the
customers
defray
those
emergency
setup
costs,
or
are
there
contractual
relationships
that
dictate
if
they're
significant,
they
may
not
be
significant
how
the
costs
would
be
allocated
I'm.
K
B
I'm,
assuming
because
it's
a
scramble
we're
not
charging
anyone
we're
doing
that
as
a
solution,
and
we,
the
city,
absorbs
whatever
those
costs
are
at
the
moment.
But
if
we're
trying
to
set
up
a
a
contingency
plan
as
per
councillor,
Rivera's
idea
are
there:
are
there
either
infrastructural
costs,
personnel
costs,
equipment
costs
separate?
And
apart
from
the
the
drinking
water
that
would
be
delivered,
that
we
will
then
be
absorbing
every
time
we
deliver
that
potable
water
to
our
customers.
K
Yeah
thinking
mr.
mayor
I
I
do
believe
if
the
facility
had
not
come
into
compliance
coming
out
of
this
meeting,
we
would
have
gone
in
to
scramble
mode
and
it
would
have
took
a
significant
amount
of
man-hours
we'd
pulled
resources
from
from
water
wastewater,
the
fire
department
anywhere
that
we
could
I
think
I
think
continuing
on
the
path
to
get
the
infrastructure
in
place.
To
do
that.
So
so
we're
looking
at
the
best
way
to
do
cost-effectively.
Do
that
and
and
do
it
right
and
do
it
efficiently.
K
So
I
think
that
initial
capital
cost
right
now
would
be
front
embodied
by
the
utility.
But
it's
my
intent
to
empower
the
reuse
customer
through
through
this
process
that
I
get
them
into
a
point
where
they
can
be
successful,
where,
if
a
movie
needed
to
trigger
this,
they
would
have
the
responsibility
to
convey
the
water
into
their
system
and
all
the
infrastructure
we
put
would
just
be
getting
the
water
on-site
accessible
for
them.
To
do
that.
So.
B
B
M
K
The
digester
project
mm-hmm,
so
the
dice
okay,
so
the
digesters
have
been
brought
online,
so
they
are
being
fed
the
organisms
that
work
in
the
digester
have
been
developed
so
right
now
the
completion
of
the
project
has
to
do
with
the
SCADA
system.
That
brings
the
telemetry
that
the
gage
readings
and
meter
readings
into
the
control
room.
That's
still
a
piece,
that's
that
has
to
be
done.
The
digester
still
need
to
be
painted,
but
they
are
they're.
K
K
Custody
now
still
so
they
do
help.
So
so
again,
the
solids
that
were
able
to
remove
and
waste
water
do
have
to
have
a
place
to
go.
They
can't
just
stay
at
the
plant,
so
those
are
being
fed
to
the
digester,
so
they
do
help
when
the
secondary
system
and
the
aeration
project
that
we're
talking
about
when
that's
not
functioning
right,
then
the
solids
and
the
secondary
treatment
don't
settle,
and
if
the
solids
don't
drop
to
the
bottom
of
the
basin,
I
can't
remove
them
to
feed
to
the
digester.
K
So
again,
the
digesters
do
help
with
the
solids
that
are
settling
to
the
bottom,
that
I
have
a
place
to
put
them
and
to
process
them.
The
the
issues
that
we're
experiencing
is
Windows
solids,
stay
suspended
and
then
are
carried
out
into
the
tertiary
treatment
and
that's
what
our
aeration
project
is
looking
to,
enhance
and
add
robustness
to.
A
K
K
I
think
their
operating
ranges
anywhere
from
12
to
13
is
where
they
keep
it
and
my
understanding
and
I
don't
have
Johnson
ubers
I
know
he's
sent
out
ballparking
20
if
they
use
20,000
gallons
a
day
normally
if
they
had
to
go
to
their
storage
and
they
could
cut
back
a
certain
percentage.
Could
they
get
10
days
of
storage?
Out
of
that
out
of
that
on-site
tank,
that's
solved
all.
A
K
Because
we're
better
so
again,
I'm,
not
knowing
the
exact
volume
but
I
think
under
modified
watering
conditions.
It
may
only
be
the
greens
so
again,
this
last
event,
I
believe
it
was
the
2013
I
was
right
at
10
or
11
days
that
the
facility
was
not
not
delivering
water
and
it
was
about
at
the
10
day
mark.
A
C
Thank
You,
mayor
and
Shannon
I
know
we
I
think
we've
talked
about
this
before,
but
just
so
we
have
this
all
in
one
place
with
this
meeting,
which
I
assume
will
be
referenced
going
forward.
So
right
now
we're
talking
about
potable
water
versus
non
potable
water
or
the
treated
effluent.
How
long
before
we
have
other
choices.
K
K
K
You
know
getting
that
getting
the
reuse
system
to
Las
Campanas
up
and
running
continuing
to
work
with
them
about
the
potential
of
bringing
raw
river
water
is
a
reality.
We
have
task
orders
where
engineers
are
looking
at
the
pump
curves
looking
at
what
those
interconnections
would
look
like,
but
I
think
realistically,
I'm
gonna
go
on
a
limb
and
say:
I
think
that
that
potential
to
bring
river
water
back
through
Las
Campanas
is
upon
14.
If
we're
able
to
get
an
agreement
with
them
could
be
as
early
as
next
irrigational
season.
C
Okay,
I
did
I
just
think
it's
important
to
capture
here
and
for
our
own
understanding
going
forward
to
that
there
are
other
things:
I
think
you
alluded
to
a
short,
medium
and
long
term
plans
and
I.
Think
people
need
to
know
that
those
are
also
things
that
you're
working
on
and
your
staff
is
working
on
and
can
provide
us
help
in
the
future.
N
You,
mayor
city
councillors
and
councillors
ravenna
again
to
help
shannon
with
the
answer
it
is
10
days
for
Swonk
park
in,
for
the
golf
course
requires
about
360
gallons
per
day
of
effluent.
Water,
so
I
would
say
again
we'll
take
this
offline,
but
it
probably
the
trigger
would
be
more
around
seven
or
eight
days
versus
versus
the
ten
days.
But
we
can.
We
can
discuss
that.
B
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
John.
Are
there
other
questions
of
Shannon
at
this
time?
Regarding
the
informational
part
of
the
agenda,
we
do
have
a
an
action
item
which
I
I
guess
I'm
assuming
is
moot
at
this
point,
since
we
are
not
going
to
be
selling
anybody.
Potable
water,
but
I
do
believe.
We'd
probably
have
to
take
a
vote.
Is
that
right
for
City
Attorney?
We
need
to
dispense
with
this
or
dispose
of
the
request
for
authorization.