►
From YouTube: Public Works and Utilities and November 9, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
G
B
H
B
D
B
J
K
B
Thank
you,
miss
pisola,
we're
on
do
a
public
comment.
um
I
know
miss
priscilla
has
a
a
couple
emails
to
read
again.
If
it's
going
to
be
longer
than
two
minutes,
I
think
the
emails
should
uh
follow
the
same
rules
as
actually
people
speaking
uh
miss
priscilla.
So
if
you
have
uh
some
emails
to
read,
this
would
be
the
time
to
do
it,
and
then
I
don't
know
if
there's
anybody
on
the
zoo
meeting,
that
I
see
a
couple
hands
going
up
from
uh
helen
milenski
and
pat
lillis.
A
M
M
I,
the
short
term
rental
ordinance
that
you
are
currently
reviewing
or
looking
over
approving,
was
only
posted
to
the
short
to
the
city's
website.
Today
um
I
know
I
contacted
michael
garcia
and
I
was
looking
at
the
old
ordinance
and
nothing
was
matching
up
quite
right,
and
so
I'm
not
sure
I'm
I've
been
trying
to
read
it
today.
uh
Actually
this
afternoon,
I'm
only
on
page
eight.
However,
my
comment
is,
it
seems
like
a
much
watered-down
version
that
what
was
presented
in
this
this
summer,
I
believe
it
was
june.
M
M
Permit
only
refers
to
residential
areas
restriction.
uh
uh
I
don't
have
any
notes
here,
um
the
um
reservation.
What
is
it
help
me?
Somebody?
Okay,
page
the
registration
and
permit
are
the
key
words,
so
the
registration
refers
to
anything,
that's
not
non,
that's
not
residential
which,
as
far
as
I
can
tell,
has
no
limit
correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong,
the
um
residential
has
a
limit
of
a
thousand
units.
M
M
B
N
B
N
So
I
I
can,
I
can
begin
so.
I
I
emailed
um
each
of
you
as
well
as
see
seeing
uh
several
of
your
fellow
council,
men
and
women
um
regarding
as
well
as
mayor
weber,
regarding
my
comments
for
tonight,
and
I
wanted
to
I'm
going
to
ad-lib
from
them.
I'm
not
going
to
read
that
directly.
If,
if
you
want
to,
you
can
do
so
at
your
leisure,
whenever
you
check
your
email
and
such,
but
primarily
because
I
don't
want
to
waste
your
time.
N
I
viewed
your
meeting
from
last
time
and
I
saw
that
there
was
um
a
rather
large
amount
of
discussion
regarding
the
museum,
experience
per
person
of
choice
and
I
reviewed
the
whole
thing,
and
I
thought
these
could
possibly
be
consolidated
into
one
position
and
then
possibly
pull
one
position
from
the
three
and
add
it
to
the
at
large.
That
was
one
suggestion
that
I
wanted
to
make
and
have
uh
considered.
N
Another
thing
was
um
the
aspect
of
the
number
of
people
who
are
interested
in
participating
in
this
myself,
being
one
that
many
of
these
at-large
prospective
members
could
be
utilized
in
some
kind
of
a
sub-committee
type
of
arrangement
they
could
be
held
for
subcommittee
secondary
consideration
list.
So
I.
B
A
O
My
name
is
moscarenas
and
I
am
asking
if
I
can
please
be
considered
I've
already
sent
in
a
letter
to
this
chart
committee.
um
I
feel
it's
important
that
I
am
on
this
committee.
I
was
one
of
the
only
females
that
um
worked
with
the
mayor
when
we
decided
to
retire
the
entrada.
It
was
over
a
two-year
period
of
working
very
hard,
and
I
think
I
I
bring
to
the
table
a
lot
of
information
that
would
help
this
committee.
B
P
E
P
My
name
is
james
borrego,
I'm
a
member
of
the
hispanic
chamber
of
commerce,
and
we
have
met
with
mayor
regarding
the
chart
committee
and
recent
occurrences,
and
we've
also
sent
letters
to
the
mayor
and
uh
counselors
re
questing
that
a
member
of
the
hispanic
chamber
of
commerce
be
included
in
this
chart.
Committee.
P
C
He
states-
I
am
I've,
been
landscaping
in
santa
fe
for
30
years
we
build
lovely
outdoor
environments
to
enhance
people's
homes.
Many
of
my
clients
can
afford
to
hire
us
to
make
these
modifications
and
improvements,
because
they
have
the
added
income
from
doing
their
short-term
rentals
with
some
part
of
their
property.
C
This
has
become
common
and
important
economic
engine,
contributing
highly
to
the
strength
of
our
community.
Ramifications
of
cutting
back
or
severely
limiting
this
engine
will
not
be
welcomed
throughout
our
town.
In
light
of
coven
19
in
our
city.
This
and
state
response
I
wish
you
would
address
the
following.
Also
short-term
rentals
are
far
more
safe
for
visitors
to
reside
here
than
large,
high-capacity
hotels
cover
19
and
the
world's
response
is
likely
to
change
the
very
nature
of
everything
we
do,
including
the
basis
of
your
reasoning
for
the
need
to
drive
this
legislation.
C
I
especially
call
out
the
righteousness
of
pushing
this
legislation
through
at
a
time
when,
due
to
covet
citizen
participation
in
government,
is
extremely
limited
and
discouragingly
difficult,
whose
agenda
is
being
met
more
easily.
Due
to
this
limited
involvement
of
resistance,
is
it
not
fair
to
act?
Is
it
not
fair
or
accurate
to
believe
you
are
performing
the
will
of
the
people
when
the
people
have
to
work
extra
hard
to
participate?
C
Q
Thank
you.
Yes,
my
name
is
chris
leslie
curtis.
I
live
at
142
vacaro
road
in
santa
fe.
um
I
also
um
have
two
short-term
rentals
within
walking
distance
to
the
plaza.
I
have
submitted
comments
uh
previously,
so
I
would
just
like
to
briefly
ask
the
committee
to
um
to
consider
our
recommendation.
I'm
also
aligned
with
the
short-term
rental
alliance,
and
we
would
like
to
see
the
seven-day
restriction
removed
from
the
current
ordinance,
and
I
would
also
like
to
ask
that
you
would
remove
the
one
permit
per
natural
person
um
the
rebuttal
I've
been
given
to.
Q
That
is
that
I
will
be
grandfathered
in.
However,
I
do
not
believe
it's
in
the
best
interest
of
short
of
um
of
small
business
and
small
business
that
we've
allowed
to
develop
with
short-term
rentals,
and
I
would
like
to
ask
that
you
remove
that
particular
um
point
of
the
ordinance,
the
that
one
natural
person
can
only
hold
one
permit.
I
have
two
short-term
rentals.
I
rely
on
them
for
income
and
I
would
like
the
city
to
please
consider
that.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
your
work
on
behalf
of
the
city
of
santa
fe.
R
There
is
a
another
uh
short-term
rental
on
my
block
and
if
the
50
or
75-foot
research
restriction
were
there,
um
I
would
not
have
able
to
to
get
a
license
of
unfortunate.
But
in
my
particular
case
the
house
was
abandoned.
It
was
uh
completely
derelict.
It
was
not
a
good
part
of
the
neighborhood
at
all.
We
had
to
do
a
complete
gut.
Rehab
uh
spent
a
lot
of
time,
a
lot
of
money
into
it.
We
would
never
have
been
able
to
buy
it
to
renovate
it
and
to
make
it
an
important
part
of
the
neighborhood.
R
If
we
did
not
have
the
ability
to
have
the
short-term
rental
thing,
uh
the
short-term
rentals
are
benefiting
neighborhoods.
We
keep.
We
have
to
keep
our
properties
up
to
the
highest
standard.
Our
competition
is
a
click
away
and
we
really
like
to
be
part
of
the
neighbors
we're
a
set
of
eyes
in
the
neighborhood
and
the
neighborhoods
can
keep
a
set
of
eyes
on
us
as
well.
R
A
F
H
J
J
J
Not
only
would
it
be
difficult
to
figure
out
which
home
actually
will
get
a
short-term
rental
permit,
but
secondly,
it
will
cut
out,
especially
in
our
smaller
neighborhoods,
where
property
lines
are
five
feet
from
each
other.
It
will
cut
out
the
opportunity
for
a
number
of
of
owners
of
homes
to
even
be
considered
for
a
short-term
rental.
My
second
concern
is-
and
I
wrote
about
this
as
well-
that
we
keep
talking
about
sixteen
hundred
short-term
rentals
in
santa
fe.
J
That
is
actually
not
the
case
and
there's
been
no
study
to
verify
which
homes
are
in
the
county
and
which
homes
are
in
the
city
which
homes
are
rented
long
term
meaning
more
than
30
days
and
which
homes
are
rented
short
term
in
need
of
a
permit.
So
we
really
don't
even
understand
the
size
of
the
problem
without
doing
that
analysis.
Q
We
are
a
group
of
hosts
that
abide
by
the
current
ordinance
pay
taxes
and
have
come
together
to
present
our
our
position
on
the
short
term
rental
ordinance.
I'd
like
to
focus
on
a
couple
of
things.
First
of
all,
please
support
the
planning
commission's
recommendation
to
change
the
one
rental
per
seven-day
period
that
is
really
difficult
for
a
short-term
rental
host
to
manage.
Q
The
second
thing
I'd
like
to
point
out
is
that
there's
a
lot
of
changes
contemplated
in
this
ordinance
and
the
one
per
natural
person
is
really
very
difficult.
I
think
you've
already
been
apprised
of
some
of
the
impact
it
could
have
between
a
married
couple.
If
someone
were
to
pass
away
in
addition,
other
inheritance,
what
would
happen?
Would
my
children
not
have
the
ability
to
inherit
a
nice
property
in
santa
fe?
I
would
really
hope
that
they
would
and
also
per
the
last
speaker's
point.
Q
The
data
doesn't
really
support
that
people
owning
lots
of
them
really
makes
a
big
difference.
There's
not
that
many
people
who
own
more
than
three
or
then
three
really
so
we
don't
think
that
that
really
makes
much
of
a
difference
and
everything
together
really
is
burdensome.
I
think
you're
going
to
tell
me
I
I'm
up
to
my
time.
Yes,.
B
B
C
Sorry
it's
in
regards
to
the
um
short
term
rental,
it's
by
roger
robert
drummond.
He
states.
Please
understand
that
my
short-term
rental
business
is
my
is
my
sole
form
of
income
in
new
mexico.
Those
of
us
who
have
permits
work
hard
to
comply
to
city
guidance
in
a
time
of
ex
exploding,
homelessness
and
economic
struggle.
It's
hard
to
understand
why
the
city
is
targeting
short-term
rentals
unless
there
are
special
interest
groups
that
might
gain
from
amending
from
an
amended
ordinance.
C
I
asked
for
the
following
one:
please
support
the
changes
plan
changes
the
planning
commission
recommended
on
the
short-term
rental
ordinance.
Two,
please
remove
the
one-day
reservation
per
seven-day
period
restriction.
The
planning
commission
recommended
the
removal
and
this
restriction
is
arbitrary
and
unenforced.
Three,
please
remove
the
one
permit
per
person
restriction
from
the
ordinance
director.
Isaacson
has
noted
that
this
is
not
an
issue
in
santa
fe
and
the
ordinance
will
not
allow
for
large
corporations
or
outside
investors
to
get
multiple
permits
anyway,
number
four
and
please
remove
the
burdensome
record
submissions
to
the
city.
C
B
That
is
all
I
have
thank
you
miss
piscilla,
um
so
I
think
that's
it
and
and
again
just
for
those
listening
and
watching.
um
We
allow
public
comment
at
the
beginning,
uh
because
if
we
wait
till
the
end,
the
decisions
have
already
been
made
and
then
you're
commenting
on
on
uh
uh
item.
That's
that's
already
been
uh
approved
by
this
uh
by
this
uh
committee.
B
Public
utilities
good
thank
you
action
items.
Let's
go
to
item
k,
which
is
a
consideration
of
a
resolution
establishing
the
city
of
santa
fe
legislative
priorities
for
consideration
by
the
new
mexico
state
legislature
during
the
55th
legislature,
state
of
new
mexico
first
session
2021,
I
believe
councilwoman
v
hill
coupler
pull
this.
H
U
U
H
T
H
H
um
I'm
not
going
to
say
yes
or
no,
that
I
agree
with
that
because
I
just
you
know
I
saw
it
today
and-
and
we
really
haven't-
had
a
discussion
with
our
uh
constituents
about
this
I've.
Never
I've,
never
known
that.
There's
been
a
discussion
about
this,
and
so
I
think
there
needs
to
be
some
dialogue
about
it
before
I'm
comfortable.
H
B
B
um
Some
of
them
uh
continue
to
stay
on,
and
then
some
of
them,
like
the
one
you
discussed,
um
could
have
some
more
discussion,
so
they've
been
uh
they've,
been
um
resolutions
that
have
been
presented,
like
I
said
by
uh
counselors,
probably
before
you
were
on
and
have
just
remained
there.
So
that's
where
a
lot
of
these
are
coming
from.
H
H
If
we
don't
know
what
they
are.
That's
my
suggestion.
So
I
don't
know
if
you're
ready
for
amendments
I
mean
I
I
do
know
the
removing
the
three
percent
tax
from
second
homes.
uh
Three
percent
tax
ceiling
from
second
homes
is
a
discussion
that
we
should
have.
uh
You
know
it's
similar
to
to
all
of
the
feedback.
We're
getting
on
the
short-term
rental
program.
B
Yeah-
and
I
think
this
is
all
open
for
discussion
so
just
like,
we
sat
together
with
jesse
and
discuss
the
amendments
for
the
chart
committee.
um
If
you
want
something
off
of
this,
I
think
you
go
through
that
same
process
and
you
can
work
with
jesse
on
those
issues
that
you
don't
think
are
pertinent
anymore.
B
Well,
I'll,
ask
you
a
question,
uh
mr
duran,
um
you
know
I.
I
know
it's
hard
to
sort
of
look
forward,
but
what
do
we?
What
are
we
sort
of
expecting
from
a
legislative
body
this
year
and
the
changes
that
have
been
made
and
the
monies
that
may
potentially
be
out
there?
If
you
even
know
any
of
that
yet.
O
U
um
As
far
as
the
legislative
session,
it's
a
60-day
legislative
session
coming
up
starting
on
the
third
tuesday
of
january,
as
every
other
uh
legislative
session
starts.
The
question
is:
is
whether
or
not
the
legislative
session
will
be
an
in-person
legislative
session
or
a
virtual
legislative
session
like
occurred
during
the
special
session
during
mid-june?
U
I
don't
know
how
anyone
can
say
that
it's
likely
to
be
an
in-person
session,
where,
on
a
normal
legislative
day,
4
000
people
a
day
would
be
entering
the
state
capital
or
some
number
like
that.
I've
heard
various
numbers.
I
know
that
the
legislative
bodies
have
been
reviewing
and
entertaining
proposals
on
virtual
uh
packages.
U
U
So
when
that
price
of
oil
went
from
63
all
to
17,
you
can
just
do
the
math
and
see
how
it
affected
us.
There
was
a
tremendous
surge
in
the
price
of
oil
today,
and
that
is
positive
news
and
so
from
a
state
revenue
picture.
I
think
it's
still
fair
to
say
it.
It's
going
to
be
very,
very
challenging
and
we're
going
to
be
running
a
deficit
and
legislators
are
going
to
be
looking
for
money
but
from
a
capital
outlay
standpoint.
U
While
we
won't
have
the
money
that
was
available
past
legislative
sessions,
because
legislators
were
using
excess
monies
to
put
into
one-time
capital
outlay
projects,
the
traditional
fund
for
capital
outlay,
which
is
interest,
earned
off
the
state
uh
permanent
fund
um
that
goes
to
capitol
valley
and
that
fund
comes
in
and
then
five
percent
gets
taken
off
for
the
tribal
infrastructure
fund.
Five
percent
gets
taken
off
for
the
colonials
and
then
there's
still
a
remaining
amount
of
money
that
gets
distributed
for
capital.
U
U
So
wow
all
of
this
60-day
legislative
session,
potentially
virtually
um
we
all
have
our
cu.
Our
work
cut
out
for
us,
um
um
I'm
pretty
sure
my
guess
is
we'll
be
doing
it
virtually
and
and
and
and
how
we
get
our
opinions
across
our
lobbying
across
our
needs
across
our
concerns
across
we're
just
going
to
have
to
find
every
avenue
to
do
it,
especially
if
it's
over
the
course
of
60
days.
B
But
thanks
for
the
few
minutes,
I
know
you
have
a
busy
schedule.
It's
all
good
information,
mr
duran,
um
I
have
no
idea
how
you
lobby
virtually
so
good
luck
to
you.
I
think
it's
going
to
be
a
a
challenge,
even
though
you
probably
already
did
in
the
in
the
special
session,
but
I
I
can't
even
imagine
how
you
do
it
so
any
other
questions
from
the
committee
all
right.
What
are
the
wishes
on
item
k.
F
uh
Thank
you
chair.
I
I
was
going
to
uh
suggest
that
uh
we
move
this
forward
with
um
no
recommendation
and
that
we
get
the
answers
to
the
questions
that
counselor
v
hill
copler
asked
uh
whether
they
come
to
us
in
uh
all
of
the
council
in
an
email
or
um
which
is
that's,
probably
the
most
reasonable
way
for
that
to
happen,
and
then
we
can
um
consider
this
once
we
have
that
information,
I'm
a
little
uncomfortable
with
it,
um
giving
it
a
recommendation
without
that
information.
B
All
right,
one
thing
uh
to
remember
is
we
have
limited
meetings
now
in
november
and
december,
so
we
need
to
make
sure
this
is
out
with
enough
time
for
mr
duran
to
start
his
work
on
it.
So
just
keep
that
in
mind,
but
we
do
have
a
motion
in
a
second.
If
there's
a,
if
there's
an
appetite
for
withdrawal,
we'll
do
that,
if
not
we'll
vote
on
the
motion.
B
Q
E
F
F
uh
Thank
you
thank
you
mark
for
coming
uh
to
the
meeting
tonight.
Thank
thank
you,
um
counselor
garcia,
for
withdrawing
your
motion.
um
Could
could
we
be
clear,
uh
with
with
staff
that
we'd
like
to
have
that
information
as
soon
as
possible?
I
don't
know
if
that
needs
to
come
out
of
uh
legal
or
out
of
the
city
manager's
office.
I
I'm
not
sure
where,
but
um
we
need
to
have
it
as
soon
as
possible.
B
B
H
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
um
There
there
are
several
amendments
here
and
um
I
would
just
ask
direction
if
you
now,
I
like
the
way
that
they're
lined
up
I'd
like
to
thank
uh
jessie
gian
for
that
uh
you
know
they're
much
more
understandable,
uh
at
least
to
me.
They
are
I'm
not
sure
to
everybody
else,
but
um
I
I'm,
I
guess
I
would
suggest
unless
you
you
want
to
reconsider
something
else,
that
um
we
just
go
amendment
by
amendment
I
and
have
the
discussion
that
maybe
we
need
to
have
and
then.
H
H
H
That's
happened
in
our
community
in
recent
days
and
the
remaining
work
of
this
committee
is
all
all
good,
all
important,
as
is
in
the
resolution,
but
it
seems
like
this
is
the
form
at
the
foref
forefront
of
people's
minds
and
that's
the
purpose
of
the
amendment
and
counselor
garcia.
Maybe
you
may
want
to
add
anything
to
what
I've
said.
D
H
H
H
H
H
D
So
item
d
was
talking
solely
about
the
plaza
and
um
there's
going
to
be.
This
issue
is
much
bigger
than
the
plaza
in
regards
to
the
recommendations
and,
um
as
you
said
uh
with
item
three,
we
kind
of
really
gave
the
emphasis
on
the
action
that
needs
to
be
taken
on
the
immediate
and
that
covers
the
obelisk
on
the
plaza.
H
H
H
Got
it
okay
and
then
number
six?
uh
We
did
strike
21
members
and
insert
in
lieu
thereof
19,
but
then
you
know
we
realize
there
are
other
amendments,
including
our
own,
that
this
number
is
kind
of
uh
not
going
to
be
necessarily
reliable,
depending
on
how
everything
shakes
out
here.
But
it's
clear
that.
H
H
F
F
Is
it
10
10
different
parts,
um
because
I
I'm
getting
a
little
confused
that
um
when
the
group
that's
put,
this
together
says
no?
No,
we
put
this
into
a
separate
thing.
It's
like
I'm,
not
sure
what
I'm
supposed
to
be
looking
at
here
I
mean
I've
read
through
all
of
these
I've
seen
that
there's
duplication
in
parts
of
it.
um
I
mean
it's
confusing
enough,
but
I
need
to
try
to
stay
as
clear
as
I
can
with
it.
So
what.
H
B
F
H
Okay,
well,
thank
you,
but
I
I
wanted
to
say
that
uh
at
least
in
correspondence
I
read
today
from
uh
our
legislative
uh
analyst
jesse
gian.
Each
one
of
these
would
stand
on
their
own
merit,
but
I'm
not
sure
when
the
answer
is
that
we
vote
on
the
entire
page.
I
thought
we
were
going
to
vote
item
by
item,
but
I'll.
B
So
continue
me
just
clarify
we
can
vote
if
no
one
has
any
questions
or
issues
with
this
page.
We
can
vote
for
all
the
amendments.
But
if
there's
um
like
after
a
discussion
with
council
beta
um
and
considering
his
amendments,
uh
we
don't
like
19
members.
Maybe
it
is
21,
then
that
portion
number
six
from
this
amendment
sheet
can
be
stricken
from
the
amendments.
B
H
H
H
H
Then,
on
number
eight,
I
believe
this
one
refers
to
striking
the
number
of
city
elected
officials
from
two
to
one
that
was
in
in
regard
to
trying
to
get
the
committee
as
manager
uh
to
a
manageable
number.
It
is
quite
a
large
committee,
then,
on
number
nine
strike
lines
19
to
21,
and
I
am
going
to
need
some
help
on
what
page
4
lines
19
to
21..
H
Yes,
thank
you
for
that
councillor
lindell.
The
rationale
behind
that
was
that
this
this
committee
uh
certainly
is
going
to
be
staffed
and
we
as
like
any
other
resolution,
we
get
uh
input
from
our
city
attorney's
office
on
matters
along
the
way
and-
and
we
believed
we
could
have
that
anyway-
uh
that
we
needed
to
really
make
this
a
manageable
committee.
And
so
we
didn't
believe
we
were
losing
out
by
not
having
legal
advice
on
the
committee.
But
therefore,
but
that
advice
would
be
available
within
our
administration
and
then
number
10.
B
P
O
D
One
is
going
to
be
in
regards
to
the
meeting
frequency
so
we're
posing
strike
regular
and
insert
at
minimum
and
after
updates
insert
public
presentations
every
other
month,
and
so
the
purpose
and
intent
of
that
amendment
is
to
at
minimum.
Have
the
council
have
written
updates
from
the
committee,
but
then
every
other
month
have
a
presentation
be
given
to
the
entire
governing
body
at
a
council
meeting
and
that
way
one
we
can
have.
Real-Time
updates
potentially
be
able
to
ask
questions,
um
but
also
be
transparent
for
the
public,
for
so
the
public
can
understand.
D
What's
going
on
at
minimum
every
month,
um
I
know
in
our
prior
committee
there
was
some
conversation
in
regards
to
presentations
and
length,
etc.
um
I
think
that's
something
where
we
can
be
flexible
with
the
committee
on
um
we're
not
necessarily
requiring
uh
an
in-depth
45-minute
presentation
on
what's
happening.
I
think
that's
where,
um
as
this
committee
gets
revolving
we'll
understand,
what's
happening
and
presentations
can
be
10
minutes
15
minutes,
but
nothing
at
length
that
nauseam,
but
we
felt
it
was.
D
B
I
think
we've
uh
updated
this
so
the
initial
proposal-
and
I
don't
know
if
you
said
this
concert
garcia-
was
to
do
a
monthly
presentation
by
the
committee,
but
quality
of
life
thought
that
that
was
too
aggressive
and
wanted
a
quarterly
uh
report.
um
We
spoke
about
it
and
thought
a
a
bi-monthly
report
would
suffice.
B
V
Time
to
talk
about
your
amendment,
uh
yes,
thank
you,
mr
chairman.
um
The
first
uh
there's
two
amendment
sheets.
The
uh
first
is
one
thousand
or
ten
thousand
point
one
a
which
is
uh
item
one.
On
page
four
line,
twenty
two
strike
three
and
insert
uh
in
lieu
thereof
two,
but
that
amendment
I
I
think
we
should
probably
withdraw
or
I'd
be
willing
to
withdraw
because,
as
uh
councilwoman
b
hill
copler
said,
I
think
the
number
of
the
committee
ultimately
is
gonna
change,
depending
on
how
the
amendments
go.
V
I
know
they
can
all
send
us
names
of
people
that
are
interested,
but
I
think
they
should
act
as
a
as
a
commission
and
be
allowed
to
have
one
person
appointed
to
the
board,
because
my
concern
is,
they
can
send
us
names
and
then
we
could
end
up
not
appointing
anybody
that
they
recommend
without
language
like
this,
and
I
don't
know
that
we
want
to
send
that
message
to
them
that
yeah
thanks
for
the
names
and
recommendations,
but
we're
not.
You
know
we're
gonna
go
with
who
we
want.
V
So
that
was
the
intent
on
that
amendment.
So
that
would
be
that
amendment
sheet
again
that
on
the
bottom
is
a
the
other.
Amendments
are
on
sheet
10255.4
c,
uh
the
first
on
page
four
line
two
after
the
period
insert
the
following
new
sentence:
at
least
eight
members
of
the
committee
shall
be
persons
nominated
by
members
of
the
governing
body
and
depending
on
who
ultimately
makes
up
or
makes
the
final
decision
on
who
sits
on
this
committee.
V
I
thought
it
was
important
that
all
of
us,
as
city
councilors,
would
have
say
on
who
would
be
on
this
committee
item
two
is
on
page
four
line:
six
after
the
word
mexico
insert,
two
of
which
must
be
based
in
santa
fe
county.
This
was
based
on
discussions
at
our
last
public
works,
where
uh
we
wanna
make
sure
that
uh
the
organization's
are
based
in
santa
fe
county
and
not
in
some
other
part
of
the
state
or
country
for
that
matter.
V
uh
Not
that
that
would
happen,
but
this
makes
it
clear
that
we
want
organizations
from
santa
fe
uh
item.
Three
is
on
page
four
line:
twenty
one
strike
one
individual
with
mediator,
dispute
resolution,
training
and
experience
an
insert
in
lieu
thereof,
a
member
of
the
mayor's
youth
advisory
board
or
a
nominee
selected
by
the
mayor's
youth
advisory
board.
I
think
it's
really
important
that
we
get
the
the
input
from
our
youth.
V
V
Seventeen
after
the
period
insert
the
following
new
sentence:
the
appropriation
shall
include
funding
for
a
mediator
with
dispute
resolution
and
restorative
justice,
training
and
experience,
and
the
restorative
justice
line
actually
was
recommended
by
councilwoman
cassette
sanchez
due
to
the
specialized
training
that
comes
with
somebody
who
not
only
is
experienced
with
dispute
resolution,
but
specifically
uh
restorative
justice
training.
Those
are
my
amendments,
mr
chairman.
Thank
you.
B
V
V
B
Maybe
um
we
don't,
we
don't
put
a
number.
Maybe
we
delete
our
number
six,
which
really
limits
a
number
from
21
to
19,
and
maybe
we
look
at
just
leaving
it
alone
until
we
can
fit
all
the
other
people
into
it.
I
think
it's
going
to
be
right
around
there
19
to
21,
but
to
specifically
say
um
19
may
not
be
what
we
want
and
I
don't
know
if
I
councilwoman,
b
hill
cobbler
counselor
garcia.
You
agree
or
don't
agree
with
that.
H
H
But
um
you
know
it's
it's
an
important
subject
and
there's
many
people
that
have
backgrounds
that
perhaps
we
need
to
have
on
this
committee.
So
I
think
the
number
will
shake
itself
out.
We
may
end
up
wanting
to
even
delete
that
whole
sentence,
uh
but
there
isn't
an
amendment
for
that
here
yet
and
we
can't
really
determine
that
till
the
end.
uh
But
I
do
want
to
make
a
couple
of
comments,
because
my
name
is
on
this
as
well
is.
May
I
proceed
yes,
okay.
H
um
I
I
too
raised
the
issue
that
I
believe
that
the
city
council
needed
to
um
have
one
appointee
to
this
committee,
uh
that
that
is
originally.
Why
I
wanted
to
uh
co-sponsor
this
amendment
the
very
first
one-
and
I
think
it's
important
that
that
uh
our
I
like
the
language
of
this,
because
I
think
it's
important-
that
we
are
guaranteed
that
we
get
to
make
one
appointment,
not
a
recommendation,
but
you
know
we
can
give
the
name.
H
But
it's
pretty
much
that
name-
and
uh
I
I
I
just
don't-
want
that
to
be
whittled
down
anytime
in
the
in
the
future,
um
the
other
and
I
support
the
rest
of
them.
The
number
four
uh
I
I
think
the
discussion
too
was
that
we've
believed
that
the
mediator,
at
least
in
councilor,
garcia
and
councillor
rivera's
amendment
in
mind
that
the
mediator
facilitator
shouldn't
be
a
member
of
the
committee
per
se.
They
are
there
with
the
job
to
do.
H
They
are
to
bring
people
to
agreements
and
further
the
the
progress
of
the
group,
and
that
was
that
person
and
position
is
going
to
be
very
important
because
with
such
a
large
committee,
they're
going
to
have
to
have
major
skills
at
doing
that,
I
know
there
are
some
very,
very
good
mediators
out
there
and
hopefully
you
know
we
can
find
some
with
restorative
justice.
But
uh
I
don't
know
that
you
know
someone
could
have
restorative
justice
experience
and
training,
but
they
may
not
be
the
best
mediator
around.
H
So
you
know,
and
so
I'm
not
sure
how
we'll
vet
this
it
kind
of
gets
it
down
to
some
finite
people
if
there
are
a
person's
or
a
person,
that's
a
great
mediator
and
has
all
this
experience
in
the
justice
component.
I'm
hoping
that
would
be
the
case,
uh
but
I
don't
know
that
we
should
limit
everything
so
much.
H
B
F
The
amendments
that
counselor
beta
went
through
are
co-sponsored
also
by
uh
the
rest
of
this
committee.
Except
for
me,
is
that
true
I
mean
those
those
are
not
specifically
uh
counselor
betas
you're
signed
on
to
them,
counselor
garcia,
signed
on,
and
so
is
counselor
vigil
copper.
I'm
just
trying
to
be
clear
on
this.
B
F
Okay,
um
I
want
to
just
go
over
a
couple
of
things
with
it.
um
I'm
not
I'm
not
sure
that
I
think
that
it's
such
a
great
idea
for
each
counselor
to
uh
nominate
someone,
and
I
want
to
be
clear-
that
the
way
that
this
reads,
because
I
know
counselor,
v
hill
koppler-
you
just
mentioned
this.
The
way
this
reads
is
it's
strictly
a
nomination.
D
So
that's
why
the
words
of
uh
nominee
are
being
used
because,
ultimately,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
the
mayor
is
the
only
person
that
has
the
authority
to
to
to
appoint,
but
but
but
but
to.
The
point
I
was
trying
to
make
earlier
is
that
we
don't
want
to
get
stuck
on
the
amendment
that
mayor
webber's
proposing
because
that
has
not
passed
yet.
That's
that's,
not
the
guiding
process,
it's
a
proposed
process
and
there
is
going
to
be
a
different
proposed
process.
As
well
that
I
strongly
feel
the
community
wants.
F
If
I
put
someone's
name
forward,
I
can't
have
the
expectation
that
that
person
is
absolutely
going
to
be
appointed
to
this
committee,
um
and
I
don't
know
that.
I
think
that
it's
a
good
idea
that
they
should
be.
um
I'm
I'm
not
clear
if
I
think
that
is
a
good
idea,
I'm
just
talking
some
of
this
through
here
in
committee,
um
the
um
so
so
that
has
to
do
with
that
amendment.
Going
back
to
the
amendment
that
has
10
parts
to
it,.
F
F
Okay,
it's
not
on
the
one
that
I'm
looking
at,
but
it's
very
hard
for
us
to
know
which
ones,
because
in
the
way
our
packet
lists
all
of
those
it's
not
very
clear
which
one
is
which
um
the
the
next
one
I
want
to
talk
about
for
just
a
moment
is
number
six
where
it
talks
about
the
size
of
this
committee
and
friends.
What
difference
does
it
make
if
it's
21
or
19.?
I
mean
it's
a
unwieldy
committee,
whether
it's
19
or
21.
F
F
T
Thank
you,
mr
chair
and
counselors
um
counselor
lindell,
just
to
uh
maybe
make
it
a
little
easier.
um
There
are
so
I
think,
maybe
you're,
looking
at
the
previous
amendment
from
councillors,
rivera
garcia
and
v
hill
coupler,
um
which
is
in
the
packet,
it's
the
one,
two
three,
four
fifth
uh
attachment.
If
you
look
at
the
sixth
attachment,
that's
an
amended
uh
amendment,
and
um
that
shows
the
language
um
as
they
wanted
it
uh
to
show
now.
T
So
it
strikes
uh
number
three
and
number
five
um
which
are
uh
which
are
then
put
into
uh
subsequent
amendments
separately,
um
and
then
it
uh
makes
a
little
uh
some
language
changes
to
number
seven
um
and
just
as
a
note
on
they
uh
changed
from
21
to
19.
That
was
done
based
on
um
their
deleting
of
uh
or
their
removal
of
a
couple
of
uh
members
from
the
committee.
So
it's
uh
it's
just
a
math
amendment,
essentially
to
make
sure
that
uh
the
number
of
uh
appointed
members
equals
what's
listed
above.
F
T
F
F
F
I
have
no
idea
who
would
be
willing
to
serve
on
this,
but
I
think
that
having
two
former
elected
officials,
um
I
think
they
could
bring
a
lot
to
this
committee
and-
and
that's
one
line
item
on
here-
um
that
I
do
disagree
with
on
this
amendment
sheet
so
um
and
number
it's
hard
for
me
to
know
now
that
I'm
on
a
new
sheet
on
number
11,
which
is
on
page
4
line,
22
strike
3
and
insert
four,
I
get
okay
that
has
to
do
with
uh
the
at-large
committee
members
yeah.
I
agree
with
that.
F
I
think
that's
a
good
idea!
So
um
number
eight
is
one
number
three's
been
taken
out.
Number
five's
been
taken
out.
I
really
question
number
six,
but
it
I
I
don't
need
to
trip
over
it,
but
number
eight
is
one
that
I
uh
feel
pretty
strongly
that
it
would
be
helpful
to
this
committee
of
this
many
people
to
have
a
couple
of
uh
formerly
elected
officials
on
it.
F
So
those
are
those
are
my
comments
chair.
Thank
you
all
for
uh
doing
the
work
on
this
that
you
have,
um
and
I
think
that
if
we
could
possibly
uh
continue
to
work
on
these
amendments
prior
to
getting
to
council,
it
would
be
uh
very,
very
helpful
to
all
of
us
come
time
to
really
vote
on
the
cit
council.
B
Yeah
it
would
be
nice
to
consolidate
and
get
everything
in
one
sheet,
or
at
least
you
know
two
sheets,
maybe,
but
um
let's
see
how
the
rest
of
this
discussion
goes.
I
did
um
forget
about
the
mayor's
amendment
and
I
know
the
mayor
I
believe
the
mayor's
on
so
I
don't
know
if
the
mayor
wants
to
take
a
minute
to
speak
to
his
amendment.
W
W
So
that's
the
amendment
if
people
have
better
a
better
way
to
go,
I'm
interested
in
the
ideas
of
of
this
committee
and
the
others
that
this
uh
resolution
will
work
its
way
through,
as
it
makes
its
way
to
the
governing
body.
But
it
struck
me
as
a
way
to
cut
across
the
committees
and
make
sure
that
all
of
the
debate
that
went
on
at
the
committee
level
got
reflected
in
the
process
of
vetting
the
candidates.
B
Thank
you
mayor
all
right,
so
we
have
a
resolution
and
a
number
of
amendments.
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
take
a
stab
at
trying
to
prove
anything.
Yet
um
I
think,
like
I
said
I
think,
we're
all
pretty
close.
uh
I
know.
Councilor
garcia
has
some
recommendations
um
with
regards
to
the
mayor's
amendment,
but
I
think
we're
close
and
we
have
signed
on
uh
most
of
this
committee,
with
the
exception
of
councilor
lindell,
on
all
the
amendments
that
have
have
come
forward.
F
Thank
you,
I'm
sorry
to
spoken
out
of
turn
chair,
um
I'm
one
I'm
just
wondering
about
um
if
we
wanted
to
vote
on
these
all
three
of
them
at
once.
If
we
want
to
vote
on
them
separately,
I
realized
that
counselor
beta
made
a
motion
um
with
all
three
that
have
been
discussed,
which
I'm
able
to
make
that
vote.
F
F
B
Yeah,
I
would
um
ask
the
maker
the
motion
in
the
second
to
consider
on
um
the
larger
amendment,
the
one
that
has
the
11
items
in
it,
that
we
consider
striking
item
two
and
item
six
out
of
it.
uh
Item
two
had
to
do
with
uh
the
mediator,
I
believe
and
and
the
dispute
resolution,
which
I
think
counts
for
beta
addressed
in
his
amendment
and
then
the
strike
item
six,
which
dealt
with
a
number
of
people
on
the
committee
from
21
to
19.
B
If
uh
council
woman,
lindelof
dolphins
feel
strongly
about
having
to
um
I'm.
Okay
with
that
and
like
we
discussed
earlier,
I'm
not
sure
what
the
difference
is
between
17
and
21
or
25
members.
So
um
if
she
feels
strongly
about
that,
I'm
okay
with
the
leading
nine-
I
don't
know
what
the
other
co-sponsors
feel
about
that
councilwoman
v,
ho
copper.
H
H
They'd
have
a
council
perspective
uh
if
they
were
a
counselor
and
or
at
least
an
elected
official
perspective,
and
our
intent
as
I
recall,
was
that
we
want.
We
felt
like
we
needed
we
needed
to
to
address
the
size
of
the
committee,
and
we
also
felt
like
it
was
more
important
to
have
a
member
at
large
than
it
was
to
have
an
elected
official
on
this
committee.
H
Our
interest
is
was
in
knowing
what
the
public
had
to
say.
There's
been
many
opinions
about
this
and
to
add
another
member
at
large.
We
felt
I
thought
would
be
more
valuable
than
to
have
the
committee
to
be
over
overly
large
and
that
we
would
get
a
perspective
from
an
elected
official,
which
is
what
we
wanted.
H
H
D
And
if
we
just
stack
this
up
with
elected
officials
and
folks
with
high-level
degrees,
the
community
is
not
going
to
buy
into
this
they're,
not
going
to
feel
like
they're
welcomed,
and
we
need
to
ensure
that
we
have
enough
at
large
seats.
And
that's
why
I
put
forth
the
recommendation.
We
lower
the
number
of
electeds
to
at
large
seats
um
all
right.
I
so.
D
Sorry,
mr
chair,
great
um
and,
and
I
I
agree
with
counselor
b
hill
koppler-
I
I
would
uh
because,
as
the
matters
the
motion
stands,
I
won't
support
it
um
solely
because
I
don't
support
the
mayor's
amendment.
I
support
the
rest
of
the
amendments
being
pushed
forth,
but
I
would
not
suppose
support
the
motion
as
proposed,
so
I
don't
know
if
um
we
can
pull
that,
but
as
it
stands,
I
would
not
be
able
to
support
it.
B
B
V
As
you
made
the
motion
to
set
the
example
for
what
we
hope
this
committee
does,
I
will
be
willing
to
move
that
off
to
the
side
right
now
and
that's
something
that
we
can
discuss
uh
in
other
committees
or
at
the
city
council.
So
I'm
willing
to
withdraw
it
so
that
potentially
we
could
have
an
unanimous
decision
out
of
this
committee
when
it
comes
to
this
resolution,
is
that
okay,
with
the
second.
B
F
T
Counselors,
um
just
on
number
six
about
deleting
the
members
um
right
now
uh
page
three
line
21
says
regarding
membership,
it
says:
chart
committee
membership
shall
include
21
members
if
we
leave
it
at
21.
It
just
won't
add
up
if
we're
adopting
the
other
amendments,
because
there
will
really
be
19
members
on
there.
So
this
you
know
the
numbers
may
change,
but
it's
based
on
what
uh
amendments
are
adopted
at
the
eventually
the
governing
body.
F
F
um
Just
that
just
because
we
pass
this
doesn't
mean
that
it's
not
going
to
get
amended
or
something's
going
to
happen
to
it
in
the
future.
um
So
I
mean
this.
This
sets
absolutely
nothing
in
stone.
um
You
know
it's
at
this
moment
in
time
for
um
this
boat,
but
um
I
really
suspect
um
a
fair
amount
of
this
will
change,
but
um
uh
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second,
so
I'm
ready
to
vote
here.
D
uh
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
and
and
in
regards
to
the
comments
my
colleague
just
made.
I
I
understand
the
perspective,
but
um
if
I
were
to
vote
in
favor
of
this,
I
would
that
would
basically
be
me
saying.
I
support
the
mayor's
amendment,
which
I
absolutely
do
not,
and
um
you
know
to
to
echo
the
comments
I
had
in
our
quality
of
life
committee
meeting.
D
Be
as
open
and
transparent
as
possible
in
a
manner
where
there
is
no
room
for
the
community
to
say
they
got
selected
because
of
this.
They
didn't
select
me
because
of
this,
and
without
any
indigenous
representation,
there's
going
to
be
too
much
room
for
folks
and
in
particular
indigenous
brothers
and
sisters
to
say
you
don't
know
me,
you
don't
know
my
culture.
Why
should
you
select
me
or
select
that
person?
D
And
I
I
think,
it's
critical
and
necessary
for
us
to
have
uh
those
demographics
as
part
of
the
selection
committee,
and
I
understand
that
at
the
end
of
the
day,
first
city
code,
it's
the
mayor
who
ultimately
appoints
these
individuals,
but
I
would
like
the
the
whatever
body
it
is.
That
makes
the
appointments
or
the
recommendations
be
a
demographics
that
thoroughly
represents
the
entire
community
and
histories
we're
trying
to
address
right
now,
and
so
with
that.
B
Yeah,
so
just
a
couple
of
things
there
uh
contra
garcia,
so
uh
the
first,
I
think
no
one's
uh
opposed
to
what
you're
saying
we
just
want
to
see
something
that
replaces
what
the
mayor
has
proposed
and
we
don't
have
that
in
front
of
us
now.
The
other
thing
is,
if
you
vote
on
something
now
in
committee,
there's
nothing
that
says
that
you
can't
vote
against
that
governing
body.
B
That's
happened
many
times.
um
You
know
it
doesn't
commit
you
to
something
things
change
all
the
time
and
you
may
like
a
resolution
that
comes
through
committee
that
changes
over
time
and
then
at
council.
You
decide
you
don't
like
it.
So
uh
keep
that
in
mind
as
well:
uh
councilwoman
v,
hill
coppler.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
uh
my
my
reasoning.
What
I
said
earlier
is
that
that
I
would
prefer
that
we
move
forward
uh
mayor
webber's
amendment
without
a
recommendation
is
because
I
think
it
it
provides
some
kind
of
adequate
reflection
of
what
we
are
discussing
today
in
that
it
provides
the
meeting
minutes
with
what's
important
for
our
history,
and
I
know,
for
example,
when
I
see
other
committees
votes,
I
do
look
through
those
sheets
to
see
who
voted
what
and
was
it
removed
from
consent.
H
Very
often
there
will
be
discussion
and
or
there
will
be
move
forward
without
uh
recommendation,
and
I
always
then
ask
what
was
this.
What
was
the
discussion
about
because
I
want
to
know
you
know
particulars,
uh
otherwise,
there's
there's
no
person
in
the
future.
Who
sees
our
minutes
in
our
our
tally
sheet.
That
even
has
any
idea
that
we
went
through
this
discussion.
We
went
through
now
and
that's
that's
one
reason
why
I
think
it's
important
and
and
granted
we
can.
H
H
B
D
D
B
An
emotion
passes,
thank
you,
miss
priscilla
and
again
uh
counselor
garcia.
As
soon
as
you
can
get
any
changes
or
ideas
in
front
of
us.
I
think
the
sooner
the
better.
So
I
know
it's
a
large
task
to
to
be
taken
on,
um
but
this
is
important.
I
think
we
all
agree
with
you,
but
in
light
of
not
having
anything
in
front
of
us,
there
has
to
be
a
method
for
us
to
to
choose
is
going
to
be
on
this
committee.
So
I
look
forward
to
your
changes.
B
H
G
uh
They
do
counselor,
and
so
so
uh
the
finance
department
maintains
four
separate
fees
for
each
of
those.
um
Those
purposes
and
those
are
held
specifically
for
impact
fees,
um
and
I
also
do
have
a
short
presentation.
I
I
do
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
respectful
of
your
time
and
that
you
know
we're
not
going
too
long.
But
if
you
want
me
to
get
into
more
details,
we
can
um
otherwise
I'll
just
respond
to
some
questions.
H
B
D
H
Okay,
thank
you,
and
the
next
question
is
on
the
fir
the
question
that
says
what
will
happen.
If
we
don't
do
this
and
it
makes
reference
to
the
city
maybe
having
to
refund
money,
and
I
would
say
why
would
we
have
to
refund
money
and
and
what
have
we
been
doing
since
then,
with
the
money
I
mean,
I,
I
don't
understand
that
part
of
the
re
the
fir.
So
um
I'm
not
sure.
I
guess
why
we
would
have
to
refund
money
and
if
so,
why
aren't
we
refunding
money
now
because
we
haven't
approved
this.
G
To
some
degree,
and
so
um
so
the
state
law,
the
development
fees
act,
um
provides
a
very
limited
way
that
the
city
can
collect
impact
fees,
and
so
the
four
funds
that
we're
collecting
impact
fees
on
um
can
only
be
used
for
those
types
of
purposes.
If
the
city
cannot
use
them
for
those
types
of
purposes,
the
city
would
be
required
to
refund
those.
That's
not
that's,
not
what
we're
directly
talking
about
right
now,
um
but
uh
we
would
need
we
would
need
a
plan
in
order
to
continue
collecting
and
using
these
fees.
X
And
if
I
could
just
make
one
quick
before
carlos
goes
into
his
uh
presentation,
uh
counselor
v
hill
copler,
you
asked
if
the
funds
go
into
the
department's
budgets,
just
a
quick
point
qualification.
They
do
not
go
into
the
department
budgets.
They
go
into
dedicated
funds
in
all
four
areas
which
are
then
available
to
uh
various
departments,
doing
projects
that
satisfy
the
eligibility
requirements
of
those
types
of
to
use
those
types
of
funds.
X
So
you
know,
parks
and
public
works
and
land
use
could
theoretically
use
um
funds
in
the
parks,
impact
fee
fund
or
public
works
and
parks
could
use
money
in
the
roads
impact
these
funds
if
they
were
say
putting
in
a
a
road
uh
in
say,
swan
park
or
another
large
regional
park.
So
um
it's
a
little.
You
know,
they're
available
to
multiple
departments
and
and
they're,
not
part
of
their
budgets
per
se.
They
are
specifically
for
funding
projects
uh
that
that
respond
to
the
impacts
of
growth
in
these
different
uh
subject,
areas.
H
G
That's
all
right,
that's
all
right!
um
So
so
before
I
start,
I
do
want
to.
You
know
caution
the
committee
that
uh
the
subject
can
get
very
technical,
um
we're
gonna
try
to
keep
this
detailed
and
focused
the
the
proposal
we
have
is
intended
to
be
a
focused
update
to
the
the
impact
fees
that
we
currently
charge
in
in
concept.
Impact
fees
are
used
by
local
governments
to
charge
development,
a
proportionate
share
of
infrastructure
costs
they
impose,
and
so
we
could
summarize
that
as
saying
growth
towards
growth,
so
impact
fees
can't
be
used
for
maintenance.
G
They
have
to
be
used
for
growing
infrastructure.
uh
Santa
fe
right
now
is
charging
four
different
types
of
impact
fees.
um
Those
impact
fees
are
not
restricted
to
the
roads
department
or
to
the
parks
or
the
fire
department,
uh
they're
restricted
to
roads,
parks,
fire
and
police
types
of
infrastructure.
G
Past
funds
have
have
been
used
for
a
lot
of
different
purposes.
I
can
discuss
those
a
little
bit.
A
lot
of
forthcoming
projects.
um
Parks
has
about
a
million
and
a
half
um
that
they
are
proposing
to
be
using
in
the
next
uh
six
months
or
so,
um
and
all
of
the
impact
fee
process
is
governed
by
the
citizen
capital
improvement
advisory
committee,
which
is
a
citizen
oversight
committee,
which
includes
um
members
uh
appointed
from
each
of
the
uh
from
each
of
the
counselors.
G
G
um
The
goals
that
we
really
had
for
this
process-
and
this
is
how
we
were
trying
to
really
focus
and
expedite
this
process-
is
make
sure
that
we
are
um
make
sure
that
we're
achieving
legal
compliance
with
state
and
local
laws
avoid
any
drastic
changes
at
the
moment,
but
then
also
try
to
consider
the
naturally
increasing
or
escalating
infrastructure
costs
that
we're
experiencing
over
time
uh
two
different
parts
of
this
proposal.
The
first
is
a
resolution
adopting
the
the
ifcip
and
so
again,
that's
a
plan.
G
G
G
G
They
are
not
established
for
feasibility,
that
is
a
separate
process,
and
so
the
the
iscip
merely
tries
to
lay
out
what
different
types
of
potentially
eligible
projects.
The
city
may
potentially
prioritize
with
impact
fees.
At
the
current
moment,
these
tables
can
change
fairly
easily,
but
it's
really
the
cip.
G
It
is
counselors,
it
is
internal
processes
and
it's
the
departments
themselves
that
are
trying
to
prioritize
and
evaluate
how
these
projects
work
again.
We
can
absolutely
think
about
how
we
could
change
the
ifcip
to
prioritize
or
to
do
different
things,
but
for
our
purposes,
because
we're
trying
to
expedite
this
process
before
december,
we're
really
keeping
that
narrow
and
limited
to
just
updating
what
we
have.
G
That's
the
ifcip,
the
proposed
ordinance
that
we've
drafted
um
it
attempts
to
first
assess
impact
fees
that
are
relatively
similar
to
2014..
So
the
main
idea
here
is
to
not
change
things
too
drastically
right
now
uh
to
not
to
not
create
too
many
um
ripples
to
not
rock
the
boat,
to
not
surprise
existing
development.
G
Staff
is
hoping
that
that
the
committee
can
consider
the
resolution
adopting
ifcip,
that
the
committee
can
consider
the
bill
amending
the
impact
fees
and
that
we
could
get
any
questions
or
concerns
so
that
we
could
try
to
resolve
those
before
the
december
9th
governing
body
meeting,
and
that's
all
I
have
so
beyond
that.
I'm
open
to
questions.
B
D
B
H
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
um
I
pulled
this
so
that
I
could
introduce
the
amendments
to
this
committee
that
I've
made
and
I'm
trying
to
pull
them
up
right
now.
Well,
the
first
one
is
uh
amending
the
the
well.
It's
not
necessarily
amending
the
short-term
rental
ordinance
as
much
as
it
is
creating
a
provision
where.
H
H
Now
um
it's
important
to
announce
restate
this
again,
it's
important
to
pay
attention
to
our
affordable
housing
program
and
it's
important
to
do
something
start
somewhere
to
fund
the
affordable,
housing
trust,
and
I
know
there
were
some
questions
uh
raised
in
finance.
In
fact,
this
didn't
even
get
a
second,
but
the
objections
that
were
raised
had
to
do
with
uh
number
one
having
a
several
streams
of
income,
and
I
I
agree
with
that.
H
uh
We
can
and
should
pay
more
attention
and
try
to
fund
this
affordable
housing,
because
we
are
very
very
behind.
I
do
understand
that
it
had
this
particular
short-term
rental
uh
gross
receipts.
Tax
has
competing
interest,
but
what
we
are
doing
here
with
some
of
these
recommendations
are
we
are.
We
are
attempting
to
make
more
strict
and
curtail
short-term
rentals
when
really
the
problem
is
enforcement
of
the
law
we
already
have
on
the
books
and
we've
we've
already,
admittedly
heard
from
the
planning
and
land
use
department
that
they
have.
H
H
H
But
we
do
have
an
opportunity
here
today
to
to
take
a
stand,
to
show
that
we
are
willing
to
do
what's
necessary
to
fund
our
affordable
housing
program
and
I'm
a
big
believer
in
in
dedicating
funds
to
to
like
programs,
so
short-term
rental
housing
to
affordable
housing.
Same
as
we
do
with
lodgers
tax.
We
collect
it.
It's
earmarked
to
tourism
and
the
like.
H
It
could
be
the
affordable
housing
trust
which
would
be
wonderful,
but
we
need
we're
very,
very
behind
and
we
are
losing
families
that
don't
have
housing
that
don't
have
anywhere
to
go
and
they're,
in
fact
leaving
leaving
santa
fe
and-
and
it's
real
easy
to
forget
about
them,
because
we
we
don't
really
have
anything
here
that
that
comes
before
us
that
talks
about
them,
and
I
think
it's
about
time
that
we
have
an
opportunity
here.
It's
about
time.
We
take
a
little
action,
not
a
piece
of
the
pie
and
it's
about
priorities.
H
Now
some
would
say:
well,
we
need
to
to
budget
for
them
and
such
and
yes,
we
do
hence
the
effective
date
of
this
to
be
july.
2021.,
um
there's
so
many
things
we
can
do
with
affordable
housing,
then
we're
not
doing
much
of
anything,
but
it
needs
money
and
it
needs
money
to
sustain
all
kinds
of
programs
to
develop
into
something
good
to
finally
address
what
we
haven't
been
addressing
for
some
time,
and
so
I
think
this
is
an
opportune
time
to
why
I
introduced
this
amendment.
H
B
V
V
Y
Thank
you,
chair
rivera
councillor
of
beta.
I
think
that
it's
a
good
question
with
regard
to
notice,
I
did
speak
to
the
city
attorney
about
it
this
afternoon
right
before
this
meeting
and
we
are
reviewing
it
um
to
decide
whether
we
need
to
put
out
a
separate
publication,
adding
that
this
would
could
potentially
affect
grt
dedications
towards
affordable
housing.
As
part
of
this
legislation,
we
are
looking
into
it.
The
uh
public
hearing
is
not
until
december
9th
and
I
think
under
state
law.
We
need
to
publish
notice
of
a
proposed
ordinance
amendment.
Y
V
Okay
um
and
then
thank
you,
uh
councilwoman
v
hill
koppler,
I
understand
the
the
intent
of
the
amendment.
I
do
have
a
concern
with
dedicating
a
portion
of
gross
receipts
taxes,
um
but
so
what
I'm
wondering
is,
if
maybe
uh
the
amendment
could
read
that
uh
under
item
3
on
page
10
line
17
that
amendment
it
says,
um
beginning
july,
1st
2021
is
provided
in
section
1810.4,
sfcc
1987
an
amount
equal
to
the
portion
of
the
gross
receipts.
V
Taxes
generated
from
the
rental
of
short-term
rental
units
within
the
city
of
santa
fe
shall
be
deposited
into
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund.
That
way,
we're
not
actually
tying
up
and
saying
this
portion
of
grt
has
to
go
to
this.
If
there's
funding
from
somewhere
else
or
other
sources,
then
we
could
then
we
can
take
from
there.
So
in
other
words
it
it
uh
yeah.
H
V
Yeah
on
the
amendment
sheet
on
item
number
three,
where
it
says
on
page
10
line
17
after
the
period
insert
the
following
new
sentence
and
the
sentence
would
read
beginning
july,
1st
2021,
as
provided
in
section
18-10.4
sfcc
1987.,
then
insert
an
amount
equal
to
the
portion
so
that
it's
not
we're
not
tying
up
the
grt.
But
we
are
saying
whatever
that
grt
generates.
V
We
need
to
put
that
amount
in
the
affordable,
housing
trust
fund
and
then
and
then
we
can
choose
or
the
finance
director
can
choose
where
it
comes
from,
but
it
would
equal
that
amount
and
then
that
way,
we're
not
strictly
dedicating
that
grt
to
that,
because
I
think
that
was
the
concern
of
the
finance
committee
uh
was
were
tying
it
into
grt
specifically.
So
this
gives
us
more
flexibility,
but
I
think
it
still
accomplishes
what
you
want,
which
is
whatever
that
amount
is
generating
it's
going
into
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund.
H
Well,
I
think
that
that
is
uh
something
that
is.
uh
You
know.
Some
money
is
better
than
no
money,
and
uh
you
know
it
didn't
look
like
this.
This
was
getting
any
steam
by
by
all
accounts
of
groups
that
I've
met
with,
and
you
know
the
the
discussion
at
finance
committee,
so
I
think
it's
it's
important
to
to
consider
what
you're
suggesting
I
also
want
to
make
the
point
that
I
originally
did
have
this
language
in
the
affordable,
uh
the
short-term
rental
ordinance,
but
on
good
recommendation
by
the
city
attorney's
office.
H
It
was
moved
to
this
section,
so
you
know
that's
that
goes
to
your
earlier
point.
It
was
in
it,
but
then
it
wasn't
in
it
which
I
agree.
It's
it's
better
in
in
this
section,
so
um
you
know
I'm
I'm
accepting
of
that,
uh
but
I
don't
want
it
to
end
there.
You
know
I
don't
want,
I
I
think,
it's
time
to
set
affordable
housing
as
a
priority.
Rather
than
just
talk
about
it.
H
uh
You
know
it's
real
hard
for
a
family
who
has
to
make
ends,
meet
to
run
down
to
city
hall
and
and
sit
in
the
chair
and
not
really
understand
when
it
is
that
they
are
supposed
to
talk,
if
if
they
are
getting
to
talk,
so
um
you
know,
as
I
mentioned
there,
there
are
a
lot
of
us
in
this
community
who
want
to
finally
see
action
and
uh
in
my
mind,
because
this
is
a
discussion
we
were
having.
uh
This
is
a
good
point
to
to
bring
it
up.
You
know
funding.
H
B
F
F
F
F
You
said
that
the
mayor
talked
about
cannabis,
there's
a
lot
of
different
sources
for
a
new
revenue
that
could
fund
this
and
that
could
fund
it
adequately.
I
don't
think
that,
um
and
once
again
I
don't
even
know
how
much
money
we're
talking
about
some
people
say
is
little.
Money
um
is
a
couple
of
hundred
thousand
dollars
from
this
uh
stream
of
revenue.
I
have
no
idea.
F
What
are
the
areas
that
um
we
would
be
to
use
a
a
nicer
term
than
cutting
that
we
would
be
reallocating
from
um
so
at
this
point?
I'm
glad
that,
uh
and
I
appreciate
that
this
has
become
a
topic
and
something
to
talk
about.
I
think
it
deserves
its
own
amount.
I
think
it
deserves
to
be
its
own
subject,
and
I
would
be
more
than
willing
to
work
on
it
as
its
own
subject.
F
H
B
Y
Y
Our
municipal
portion
of
the
grt
is
allocated
by
quarter
percent,
and
some
of
that
is
already
two
specific
purposes,
so
the
part
we
can
play
with
in
my
understanding
is
the
part
that
would
normally
go
into
our
general
fund,
and
so
I
think,
that's
kind
of
why
we've
had
to
try
to
wordsmith
this
in
a
way.
So,
if
we're
going
to
adjust
the
language,
we
just
need
to
kind
of
keep
an
eye
on
that
and
to
make
bigger
revisions
would
require
more.
I
think,
research
into
what
what
persons
does
the
governing
body
have.
Y
The
ability
to
change
are
certain
things
actually
stop
by
state
law
in
terms
of
like
paying
off
our
bonds
and
things.
I
think
some
of
that
we
do
have
some
other
obligations,
so
I'm
not
a
tax
attorney.
It's
a
complicated
area
so
doing
this
right.
um
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
keeping
an
eye
on
these
kinds
of
changes
to
make
sure
that
we're
tracking
the
law.
That's
all.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
B
X
I
have
not
spoken
with
uh
director
mccoy
or
uh
brad
flitch
since
that
meeting,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
they've
been
able
to
track
that
information
down
yet
or
not,
but
I
know
they're
actively
trying
to
figure
out
what
the
amount
is
and
then
to
assist
in
city
attorney.
Payez's
point:
um
you
know,
after
we
figure
out
what
the
sort
of
gross
number
is,
then
we'll
have
to
do
some
calculations
to
figure
out
what
the
net
amount
is
based
off.
X
X
There
was
there
was
some
language
in
the
civil
penalties
ordinance
that
was
passed
earlier
this
year
that
stipulated
that
the
money
generated
by
issuing
civil
penalties
for
land
use
violations
would
go
towards
supporting
first,
the
short-term
rental
office
and
then
the
land
use
department.
More
broadly,
so
that's
where
some
of
that
money
will
go,
um
but
in
terms
of
the
lodgers
tax
and
grt
that
is
generated
by
short-term
rentals.
uh
It's
my
understanding
that
money
will
continue
to
go
to
the
general
fund.
B
X
B
V
But
I
want
to
confirm
that
with
ms
mccoy,
I
I
don't
think
we're
talking
a
million
dollars
or
more
than
a
million
dollars
even
in
good
years,
because
it's
when
you
break
down
the
different
increments
and
you
keep
breaking
it
down.
I
I
don't
think
we're
talking
about
a
million
or
more,
but
I
couldn't
be
wrong.
That's
something
that
miss
mccoy
is
researching,
as
director
isaacson
said,
so.
V
At
some
point,
uh
yes
well
not
only
on
this,
but
the
affordable,
housing
trust
fund
in
general
and
how?
Because
I
I
agree
with
councilwoman
vo
koppler-
I
think
we
do
need
to
figure
out
how
to
how
to
start
funding
it
and
putting
money
towards
that.
And
I
think
the
rest
of
the
finance
committee
feels
the
same
way
and
that's
why
they've
asked
for
this
information
and
these
studies
as
we
move
forward.
V
B
D
Garcia,
uh
thank
you,
mr
chair,
um
so
that
amendment
was
brought
forth.
You
know
per
the
recommendation
not
only
of
the
planning
commission,
but
um
I
think,
there's
community
support
for
that,
in
the
sense
that
um
the
challenges
we've
seen
with
our
short-term
rentals
have
been
number
of
rentals,
not
necessarily
the
days
of
of
rentals
being
rented
out,
and
I
think
that
was
obvious
to
the
planning
commission
as
well.
So
that's
why
they've
put
forth
the
recommendation
that
we
eliminate
this.
D
F
B
F
T
F
H
H
It
creates
a
real
hardship
for
some
of
the
people
that
well
you've
heard
you
know,
you've
gotten
you've,
all
gotten
emails
and
phone
calls
uh
it's
it's
impossible
to
enforce,
and
secondly,
it's
really
not
the
way
uh
real
life
is
and
think
of
the
times
that
you
travel.
If
you
stay,
even
if
you
stay
in
a
hotel,
this
is
kind
of
similar
to
that
you
go
in
you're,
going
to
go
in
for
the
weekend
uh
and
then
you're
going
to
take
off,
maybe
even
to
somewhere
else.
H
Next,
on
your
journey
that
that
analogy
uh
places
the
the
owner
of
a
short-term
rental
in
in
a
real
problem
where,
okay,
just
because
you
stayed
there
hopping
from
because
you're
going
somewhere
else
after
this,
um
they
can't
rent
their
rental
until
the
seven
days
is
expired.
uh
I
see
no
rationale
for
this.
I
I
just
can't
imagine
why
we
want
to
micromanage
so
much
at
that
level
and
I'll
go
to
my
point
earlier,
and
that
is
uh
you
know.
H
Short-Term
rentals
are
a
good
source
of
income
for
us
and
we
can't
forget
that
whether
we
spend
it
on
affordable
housing,
trust
or
not,
uh
you
know
we're
hurting
right.
Now
we
did
get
the
august
report,
uh
I
mean
the
report
from
august
gross
receipts
and
it
shows
that
we're
13
13
point
something
percent
down
from
august
of
last
year.
H
um
You
know
so
so
we
you
know
I
I
said
this
way
earlier.
We
can't
uh
turn
away
the
hand
that
feeds
us
and-
and
so
I
think,
the
you
know
the
more
we
can
uh
continue
to
support
the
people
who
make
us
money.
uh
I
think
that's
important
to
be
said.
Okay,
so
I'll
go
to
my
next
uh
amendment
sheet,
which
you
should
find,
I
think
it's
the
second
one
with
my
name
on
it.
H
uh
If
you
go
to
page
seven
line
five,
I'm
suggesting
that
after
corporation
we
insert
and
such
entity
whether
a
revocable
trust,
an
llc
or
a
corporation,
shall
be
responsible
for
any
criminal
or
civil
violation
and
fines,
and
that
is
because
you
know
the
natural
person
who's,
whose
name
might
not
even
necessarily
be
individually
on
this
shouldn't,
be
additionally
required
to
pay
fines
when
the
actual
rental
is
in
the
corporation's
name.
It's
not
trying
to
get
out
of
paying
any
fines.
It's
just
not
assessing
a
natural
person.
H
We
have
a
problem
here
because
and
we're
going
to
create
a
real,
uh
unfair
issue
with
this
this
it
went
from
when
it
was
75
feet.
You
know
it
was
it
wasn't,
it
wasn't
good,
but
we
changed
it
to
50
feet,
but
it's
from
the
boundary.
So
you
know
if
your
property
stretches
way
out
there.
That's
that's
your
whole
front
yard
and
several
feet
that
count
against
you.
H
H
We
are
imposing
more
strict
restrictions
on
people
that
haven't
broken
the
rules
and
again
we're
cutting
off
some
income
that
we
should
take
take
note
of
now
we
have
limited
the
short-term
permits
to
a
thousand
all
if
you're
gra
you're
going
to
grandfather
in
over
800
and
some
permits.
You
realize
that
so
all
we're
talking
about
is
125,
maybe
150
permits,
I'm
not
sure
exactly.
What's
left
over
of
permits
to
give
to
make.
H
Well,
you
know,
that's
some!
That's
just
not
fair!
You
gotta
attack
the
the
problem
at
its
root
and
I
think
we
should
do
that.
We
should
pay
more
attention
to
enforcement,
but
since
we
have
this
before
us,
you
know
it's
like
amending
it.
I'm
amending
it
to
try
to
make
it
a
little
more
palpable,
and
so
you
know
usually
people
pay
attention
to
what's
going
on
on
their
street
they're,
not
paying
attention
to
what's
going
on
behind
them
or
you
know
further
around
the
corner,
because
some
of
these
houses
are
somewhat
close
together.
X
It's
actually
an
offset
from
the
property
line,
and
so
um
it
doesn't
matter
where
the
unit
is
positioned
on
the
property.
uh
The
offset
will
remain
the
same
and
that
it
will
be
from
that
property
line.
Now
the
question
about
whether
or
not
that
should
be
uh
restricted
to
the
front
half
of
the
property
and
the
and
the
you
know
just
looking
at
the
offset
uh
forward.
X
um
I
think
there's
two
things
uh
that
um
that
brings
to
mind.
First,
you
know
in
our
conversations
with
the
sponsors
as
we
are
drafting
the
original
legislation.
um
That
question
came
up
and
I
think
you
know
those
involved
in
the
conversation
uh
properly
identified,
that
you
know
it
doesn't
really
matter.
If
a
short-term
rental
is
in
front
of
you
or
to
the
side
of
you
or
behind
you.
X
It's
an
analysis
that
will
be
done
at
the
time
of
issuing
permits
and
would
be
one
that
we
could
easily
enforce,
because
we
can
use
the
gis
information
to
quickly
determine
if
a
property
where
an
application
is
uh
has
been
received
based
off
existing
short-term
rentals,
you
know,
is
it
within
the
buffer
ring
of
an
existing
permit
or
not,
and
based
off
that
determination.
We
would
know
whether
or
not
to
issue
a
permit
on
this
application
or
not.
X
H
Well,
I
I
still
think
that
that
it's
it's
a
little
bit
punitive
uh
for
125
permits
left.
You
know
it's
really.
uh
I
think
it's
damaging
the
people's
uh
property
rights
to
do
what
others
in
their
own
neighborhood
are
doing.
I
can
see
some
of
these
other
changes
being
made
that
will
facilitate
uh
more
even
application
of
the
ordinance,
but
we're
not
enforcing
anything
and-
and
uh
you
know
we
haven't
been
enforcing
too
much
of
this
ordinance
as
it
is
for
for
all
kinds
of
reasons,
not
that
you
don't
want
to.
H
After
the
word
number
strike
the
rest
of
the
sentence
and
and
what
and
then
later
on
I'll
just
continue
with
page
eight,
uh
I
recommend
striking
line
at
line
12
striking
all
of
item
a
and
then
the
next
amendment
strike
b
as
well.
So
what
this
does
is
this
this
in
these
multi-family
units.
This
really
creates
unfairness
within
a
group.
Now
some
of
the
multi-family
dwelling
units
don't
allow
short-term
rentals
many
of
them.
Don't
when
you
do
this,
it's
going
to
really
create
some
unfairness,
because
you
are
grandfathering
in
so
build.
H
X
X
um
So
that
was
sort
of
the
thinking
there
and,
and
so
the
idea
being,
you
know
25.
So
if
you
have
four
units,
one
of
them
can
be
a
short-term
rental.
uh
If
you
had,
you
know
eight
and
you
could
go
to
two
and
escalate,
and
so,
if
you
did
have
a
building
um
that
had,
I
guess
it
would
be.
Math
isn't
my
strong
suit.
But
if
you
had
48
units
and
you
wanted
to
use
12
25
of
them
as
short-term
rentals,
you
could.
X
Well,
so
it's
it's
12
per
building,
and
so,
if
you
had
a
a
compound
uh
like
many
of
our
multi-family
condo
compounds,
you
you
mentioned
fort
marcy,
that's
a
little
bit
of
an
outlier
because
that's
a
resort
residential
community.
But
if
we
wanted
to
just
use,
say
el
matador
condos
as
a
example,
even
though
they
don't
allow
short-term
rentals
there,
but
they're
a
good
example,
because
I
think
most
of
us
are
familiar
with
them.
X
You
know
they
have
multiple
buildings.
I
think
they
have
five
or
six
different
buildings
on
the
site,
and
so
they
would
be
allowed
to
have
up
to
12
uh
in
each
building
as
long
as
they
don't
exceed
the
25
overall
capacity,
and
so
it's
use
both
of
those
numbers
to
sort
of
level
into
what
is
a
sort
of
reasonable
amount
of
short-term
rental
units
distributed
across
the
site.
um
But
if
they
had
say
100
units
and
they
would
be
entitled
to
25
overall
short-term
rental
units
in
their
compound,
we
would
allow
that.
H
Well,
you
know
it.
It
just
goes
back
to
just
a
lot
of
punitive.
I
consider
to
be
punitive
measures
against
property
owners
uh
when
we're
only
really
talking
about
125
available
permits,
maybe
cut
you
know,
plus
or
minus,
and
yet
the
city
hasn't
really
done
our
job
of
enforcement
in
a
in
a
very
good
way.
I
mean,
I
know,
we've
had
some
enforcement,
but
I
would.
X
I
appreciate
that
and
I
think
what
is
an
important
sort
of
distinction
to
make
is
on
some
of
these
issues.
Is
you
know
the
difference
between
enforcement
and
prevention,
and
so
in
the
area
of
you
know
where
should
permits
be
issued
um
and
preventing
trying
to
prevent
too
many
short-term
rental
units
being
issued
in
any
one
area?
I
think
we've
been
pretty
good
at
that
and
and
this
provision
the
25
feet
or
the
25
up
to
12.
X
These
types
of
things
are
things
we
can
prevent
from
happening,
because
they're
reviewed
and
analyzed
at
the
time
of
application.
Some
of
the
enforcement
challenges
that
we
have
are
more
about
the
operation
of
these
units
after
the
permits
have
been
issued
and
and
some
of
the
ongoing
challenges
there.
um
I
think
that
you
know.
We've
also
been
talking
about
the
notion
of
of
enforcement
around
the
one
state
for
seven
day.
X
Provision
um
and
again,
I
think
that
that's
an
area
where
we
can
make
a
distinction
between
prevention
and
enforcement
right
and-
and
it's
a
little
different
here,
where
it
isn't
something
counselor
garcia,
is
correct
right,
it's
something
that
is
difficult
for
us
to
prevent
from
happening.
However,
we
do
have
mechanisms
in
place
to
enforce
uh
just
this
week.
X
They're
actually
only
renting
a
couple
times
per
month,
um
and
so
that
is
a
tool
that,
up
until
very
recently
we
didn't
have
at
our
disposal
but
the
tool,
that's
very
powerful
and
makes
what
resources
we
do
have
in
terms
of
enforcement.
uh
Much
more
capable,
and
so
um
I
think
that
you
know
you
know
I
you
know
I
I
don't
wanna.
X
I
know
counselors
feel
strongly
about
whether
that
provision
should
stay
or
whether
that
provision
should
be
removed
from
the
legislation.
But
I
will
say
that
in
you
know
to
say
that
we
don't
have
any
enforcement
uh
remedies
at
our
disposal
isn't
exactly
true,
because
it
is
something
that
we
can
audit.
uh
If
we
get
a
complaint
about
the
frequency,
that's
being
rented
and
verify
and
follow
up
on
based
off
of
uh
the
information
we
get
from
hosting
clients,
so
I
hope
that
provides
a
little
bit
more
information.
X
H
It
so
you
know
that
is
just
it's.
I
don't
know.
I
just
really
don't
like
that,
because
that
really
is
the
the
biggest
most
unfair
thing
that
I
think
it
that's
in
all
of
this.
um
If
we
enforce
good
behavior
compliance
and
such
with
the
all
of
these
other
restrictions,
what
does
it
matter
for
125
permits?
What
does
it
matter
keep
in
mind
the
this
is
income
generating
for
the
city,
not
only
that
because
they
pay
gross
receipts,
but
these
people
that
come
into
our
city.
H
They
spend
money
here
and
we're
not
even
talking
about
those
kinds
of
of
monies.
You
know
I'm
talking
about
gross
receipts
strictly
from
rentals
from
the
rents.
You
know
that
are
paid
uh
these
people
are,
they
contribute
to
tourism
and
such
and
now
you're
going
to
lessen
the
ability
for
many
people
to
even
do
this
so
that
you
may
not
even
give
out
125
more
permits.
H
We
don't
want
those
people
infiltrating
our
short-term,
rentals,
neighborhoods
and
such
but
there's
a
lot
of
local
people
who
use
this,
and
and
much
of
this
is
going
to
hurt
them
because
they're
barely
in
a
position
now
to
do
this,
and
now,
with
these
stringent
restrictions,
it's
going
to
put
them
out
and
I
don't
think
that's
fair.
I
think
maybe
we
should
make
a
restriction
that
local
people
can
do
it
santa
fe
people,
but
I
don't
have
that
amendment
here.
So,
uh
mr
chair,
that
that
is
the
end
of
my
proposal.
F
B
F
Y
Y
Y
um
So
the
the
first
uh
item
on
this
amendment
sheet-
and
this
is
sponsored
by
the
four
sponsors
of
the
initial
legislation-
would
be
an
amendment
to
the
table
of
permitted
uses
which
is
in
14-6.1-1,
and
so
the
short-term
rental
use
is
a
use
listed
in
our
our
uses
table
which
applies
for
the
zoning
districts.
So
you
can
see
all
of
our
zoning
districts
across
the
top,
and
this
is
uh
considered
a
residential
use,
and
currently
we
notice
that
this
table
is
already
not
reflective
of
our
ordinance.
Y
Y
The
settlement
of
the
permit
holder's
estate
and
the
spouse,
or
domestic
partner
does
not
already
hold
a
short-term
rental
permit
and
just
to
clarify
this
is
in
a
sub-paragraph
that
would
apply
only
to
residentially
zoned
properties
um
that
have
a
short-term
rental
permit,
and
it's
a
sort
of
exception
to
the
proposed
role.
That
permits
cannot
be.
Y
Y
If
a
multi,
multiple
family
dwelling
development
is
located
within
200
feet
of
residentially
zoned
property
and
contains
four
or
more
dwelling
units.
The
language
director
shall
not
issue
short-term
rental
registrations
for
more
than
25
of
the
dwelling
units
rounded
down,
and
so
this
was
a
provision
that
would
have
limited
density
within
a
multi-family
complexes
that
were
within
the
200
feet
of
residentially
zoned
property,
and
the
planning
commission
did
recommend
uh
striking
this
provision.
Some
concerns
were
raised
about
it.
B
H
B
B
B
H
B
Y
uh
Chair
um
committee
members,
the
um
proposal
is
certainly
related
to
short-term
rental,
in
that
it
would
put
a
portion
of
grt
tax
from
short-term
rentals
into
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund.
So
I
I
think
um
it's
it's
probably
sufficiently
related
to
the
overall
topic
to
be
considered
as
a
single
bill.
Ultimately,
the
bill
would
contain
the
pieces
and
then
the
ordinances
there's
separate
ordinances
throughout
the
code
that
we
would
scatter
a
few
amendments
um
in
various
places.
B
V
D
O
F
F
F
Each
one
has
to
be
voted
on.
um
You
know
all
of
those
uh
points
in
the
second
amendment
that
you
brought
counselor
v
hill
koppler.
I
went
over
all
of
those
with
a
group
from
the
realtors
association
today
and
we
talked
about
every
one
of
them
um
and
you
know
the
idea
that
it's
just
from
the
front
of
the
property
that
really
doesn't
gain
anybody
um
that
that
doesn't
gain
anything
for
anybody,
and
you
know
it
would
be.
F
Eliminating
it
would
be
what
would
gain,
but
you
know
this
committee
spent
a
lot
of
time
talking
about
it
and
the
density
of
short-term
rentals.
We
looked
at
many.
Many
maps
from
the
gis
so
well
could
have
been
a
short
answer.
Chair
turned
into
a
much
longer
answer
than
I
intended
to,
but
um
so
no
there's
not
a
there's,
no
friendly
amendment,
I'm
sorry,
but
that's
just
procedurally.
F
B
T
B
Y
Yes,
my
understanding
is
that
we
will
go
ahead
and
carry
these
through.
um
The
next
scheduled
stop,
I
think,
is
actually
the
public
hearing
at
governing
body,
and
at
that
point
I
think
full
amendment
sheets
parts
of
amendment
sheets
could
potentially
all
be
voted
on
independently
is
my
understanding
of
our
current
process.
B
X
Yeah,
thank
you,
uh
mr
chair
counselor.
Vietnam.
Coupler
I'd
be
happy
to
provide
that
again.
It's
not
a
report
per
se.
um
It's
in
a
gis
map
file,
so
maybe
you
and
I
can
talk
offline
about
how
you'd
like
me
to
share
that
information
with
you
um
just
because
it
can
be.
You
know
I
can
give
you
a
series
of
pdfs
that
should
show
you
in
different
areas
of
the
city,
how
these
different
buffer
rings
sort
of
impact
adjacent
properties,
but
um
it's
not
currently
packaged
in
any
sort
of
report
at
this
time.
X
X
See
that's
the
thing,
so
it's
it's!
You
really
got
to
zoom
in
almost
sort
of
like,
like
even
smaller
than
a
neighborhood
scale.
It's
really
got
to
be
at
sort
of
the
scale
of
a
few
different
blocks.
To
really
be
able
to
see
things
clearly,
so
um
I'd
be
happy
to
to
uh
talk
to
you
again
offline.
uh
Maybe
we
can
do
some
sharing
of
screens
on
the
zoom
call.
H
X
H
B
F
uh
Thank
you
chair.
I
just
wanted
actually
uh
to
thank
the
committee
for
their
hard
work.
These
um
these
have
been
complicated
topics.
I
think
we've
brought
up
some
things
that
we
all
want
to
spend
some
more
time
on.
I
think
counselor
dehill
koppler
has
brought
to
life
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund
that
we
need
to
find
a
way
to
fund
that.
F
B
B
Yeah,
so
I
just
wanted
to
thank
you
again
from
the
bottom
of
my
heart,
for
keeping
me
straight
and
in
line
the
whole
time
for
putting
together
some
great
agendas
and
and
doing
the
the
minutes
and
and
doing
the
roll
calls.
Those
have
all
been
new
for
us
and
changes
for
us
and
you've
done
a
great
job.
So
I'm
really
gonna
miss
you.
I
know
um
you
have
some
big
shoes
to
fill
so
hopefully
people
are
up
to
the
test.
B
So
thanks
again,
under
normal
circumstances,
we'd
be
having
a
little
celebration
in
the
council
chambers
with
fruit
and
cheese
and
some
other
things.
But
I
wish
we
could
do
that,
maybe
at
some
point
we
will,
but
for
now
I'm
just
my
uh
heartfelt
gratitude
towards
you
and
I
wish
you
nothing,
but
the
best
in
your
new
endeavors.
H
I'm
sure
all
of
us
would
like
to
thank
uh
miss
priscilla.
I
I
forgot
that
today
was
her
last
day,
because
I
think
I
congratulated
her
at
the
last
meeting,
but
uh
you
know
I
I
appreciate
everything.
You've
done,
uh
you've
been
uh
just
really
stellar
and
I'm
not
sure
where
you're
going,
I
I'm
not
sure,
but
uh
if
it's
greener
pastures
and
and
even
if
it
isn't,
if
it's
a
better
life
for
you,
I
wish
you
all
the
best.
Thank
you.
H
Z
H
B
And
then
uh
just
uh
one
more
matter
for
me,
I'd
like
to
you
know
just
thank
everyone
that
helped
uh
clean
up
around
pete's
place
this
past
weekend.
It
was
a
great
to
see
everybody
out
and
about
and
doing
a
great
job
cleaning
up
that
neighborhood.
So
that
was
much
appreciated
as
well
uh
with
that
um
our
next
meeting
is
monday
december
14th.