►
From YouTube: Public Works and Utilities for March 29, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
Anything
from
the
committee
uh
if
um
item
r
gets
pulled,
I'm
gonna
move
that
up
to
the
first
action
item
if
it
does
get
pulled
just
so,
I
can
be
part
of
the
discussion
and
then
I
will
jump
off
and
counselor
beta
has
agreed
to
chair
the
remainder
of
the
meeting
after
that.
So
I
have
a
three
year
old
birthday
party
to
attend
to
so
I
will
be
doing
that.
So
thank
you
to
councillor
beta
for
that.
A
A
A
F
A
G
G
A
A
A
A
A
A
E
A
An
ordinance
regarding
the
independent
salary
commission,
making
clarifications
amending
certain
sections
and
changing
certain
sections
and
the
effective
date
of
the
salary
to
align
with
the
term
of
the
mayor
set
forth
in
the
santa
fe
election
code
and
really
for,
except
for
the
future
schedule
for
the
independent
salary
commission
being
sponsored
by
myself,
council,
romeroworth
and
councillor
lindell.
So
I
believe,
councillor
lindell
pulled
this.
H
A
So
if,
if
the
election
was
still
held
in
march
this,
this
may
work
out
um
the
way
the
language
is
set
up.
Currently,
however,
because
we
changed
the
election
to
november,
it
set
the
schedule
off
by
a
few
months,
so
that
then
the
current
um
uh
mayor
was
really
in
a
position
where
he
would
have
already,
in
our
case
he
announced
already
and
then
was
trying
to
set
up
the
commission
at
the
same
time.
So
uh
it
created
some
issues.
A
I
think
so,
myself,
council,
councilor
mental
worth
and
council
lindell
are
proposing
some
changes
to
go
in
line
to
make
it
a
little
easier
and
go
in
line
a
little
bit
better
with
a
november
election
than
a
march
election.
So
some
of
the
changes,
the
really
the
big
change
I
think
is-
is
setting
the
commission
up
so
that
it's
meeting
an
entire
year
before
the
actual
election
is
held.
A
It
does
state
the
membership
and
outlines
the
application
process
to
be
on
that
on
the
commission,
which
wasn't
there
before
um
and
also
clears
up
some
other
language
again
with
the
dates
um
regarding
the
the
november
election.
So
I
think
it
makes
it
a
little
bit
cleaner,
a
little
bit
um
easier
for
people
to
to
work
on
an
independent
commission
prior
to
really
anybody
announcing,
or
there
been
any
any
uh
issues
with
uh
with
the
election
itself.
E
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
chair,
and
thank
you
for
that
clarification
and
context.
I
really
appreciate
it.
um
I
I
agree
with
the
changes
in
this
that
uh
the
application
process.
um
I
think
that's
going
to
be
a
great
addition.
We
just,
I
think
we
need
to
work
to
determine
who's
going
to
review
the
the
applications
and
um
you
know
ultimately
make
recommendations
and
I'll
get
to
that
a
little
later.
E
I
Air,
I
mean
sorry,
I'm
not
in
a
city
council
meeting
tonight,
council
rivera
chair,
rivera,
counselor
garcia,
it's
in
the
current
ordinance.
um
I
think
the
idea
of
the
current
ordinance
was
it
would
be
similar
to
independent
judicial
nominations
at
the
federal
level
where
judges
are
nominated
by
the
president
and
then
appointed
by
this
are
you
know,
approved
by
the
senate,
and
then
they
act
independently,
meaning
there's
not
any
oversight.
Does
it
have
to
be
that
way,
and
it
doesn't
have
to
be
that
way,
but
I
think
that's
how
it
was
conceived.
E
Okay,
thank
you
so
much.
I
really
appreciate
that
city
attorney
mcsherry.
So
ultimately
it
doesn't
have
to
be
the
mayor
and
I
think
that's
the
crux
of
the
problem
we
have
here
with
this
ordinance
is
we
want
to
take
the
the
authority
out
of
the
mayor's
hand,
so
to
speak
to
ensure
that
there's
independence?
E
E
um
I'd
like
to
work
with
my
governing
body
colleagues
to
determine
the
process
we'd
like
to
figure
out
how
we
can
go
through
that
to
determine
how
we,
as
a
body,
can
approve
these
individuals
um
the
process.
Now
that
there's
a
proposal
to
uh
have
them
go
through
an
application
process,
who's
going
to
review
the
application.
Who
is
going
to
be
the
body
to
make
the
ultimate
recommendation
to
the
governing
body
not,
and
that
way
it's
not
the
mayor
that
makes
the
appointment
it's
an
independent
body
that
makes
the
appointments.
E
It
is
my
understanding
that
there
would
no
be
no
there
wouldn't
be
any
uh
convening
of
this
body,
for
so
there
would
be
no
salary
adjustment
conversations
to
be
had
and
the
current
salary
would
stay
in
place
until
january.
1St
2025.,
am
I
correct
in
that
understanding,
and
I
guess
that
maybe
that
is
for
city
attorney,
mcsherry.
I
E
H
uh
Thank
you
chair.
Thank
you,
uh
counselor
garcia.
um
You
know
my
thoughts
are
pretty
much
along
the
same
lines
as
uh
counselor
garcia
and
I'm
wondering
uh
counselor
garcia.
If
you'd
like
to
um
one
of
the
thoughts
that
I
had
in
looking
at
this,
and
it's
not
particularly
well
thought
out,
but
um
it's
an
idea
that,
if
excuse
me.
H
The
children
counselor
garcia,
if
you'd
be
willing
to
work
with
me.
The
thought
that
had
come
into
my
head
and
looking
at
this
again
today
was
um
what
would
happen
if
every
place
that
it
talks
about
where
the
mayor
chooses
or
the
mirror
points.
If
we
substituted
uh
the
chairman
of
the
finance
committee
rather
than
the
mayor
and
if
you'd
be
willing
to
sit
down
and
go
through
this
with
me
and
work
on
it,
um
I'd
be
more
than
happy
to
do
that.
I
think
that
we
could
make
some
progress.
H
A
um
I'm
gonna
allow
uh
and
hopefully
she'll
be
willing
to
speak,
but
counselor
overall
worth,
who,
I
believe
was
part
of
the
charter,
a
committee
that
that
put
this
language
into
play
as
well.
As
uh
you
know,
the
changes
to
the
full-time
mayor
and
other
things
so
counter-ameriworth,
if
you
wouldn't
mind
giving
us
a
little
bit
of
the
historical
perspective
here
with
regards
to
the
salary
commission.
F
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
um
I
I
think
uh
what
I
would
say
is
that
the
voters
in
2014
uh
approved
a
charter
amendment
that
requires
a
salary
commission,
it's
in
our
charter,
so
I
know
there
had
been
some
talk
about.
I
think
there
was
a
newspaper
editorial
that
suggested
that
why
don't
we
just
you
know,
have
the
salary
increase
according
to
say,
cost
of
living
or
some
outside
measurement.
That
would
help
it
stay
current
as
we
get
further
along.
F
You
can't
just
pull
a
number
out
of
the
air,
but
that
you
should
look
at
others,
quote-unquote
ceo
salaries
um
in
the
region
in
the
community,
uh
to
make
sure
that
you're
in
the
ballpark
of
what
a
ceo
should
be
making,
and
so
um
I
think
we,
you
know
the
reason
why
they
couldn't
say
a
specific
salary
is
because
you
don't
want
the
governing
body
uh
deciding
what
that
salary
is.
um
It
was
supposed
to
be
an
independent
group
looking
at
various
factors
and
then
figuring
out
where
to
set
it.
A
Yes,
thank
you
very
much,
um
miss
mcsherry.
um
So,
even
if
even
if
the
mayor
didn't
make
the
appointments,
let's
say
people
applied,
and
it
was
the
chair
of
the
finance
committee
that
took
in
applications
and
then
made
appointments
or
well.
I
guess
they
would
still
have
to
make
those
recommendations
through
the
mayor
and
then
through
the
governing
body.
Would
it
continue
with
that
process.
E
uh
Yeah,
mr
chair,
uh
our
neighbors
to
the
south
albuquerque.
I
think
what
they
do
with
their
process
is
they
um
have
an
independent
body
that
reviews
the
applications
and
makes
the
appointment
or
the
recommendations
for
appointment
and
ultimately,
the
governing
body
as
a
whole
appoints
the
members.
A
All
right,
I
appreciate
that
I
don't
think
anybody's
um
sounds
like
everyone's
interested
in
uh
exploring
or
looking
at
language
changes
that
you
and
councillor
wendell
might
uh
work
on.
So
uh
we'll
look
forward
to
that
counselor
v
hill
cup
or
council
garcia.
Were
you
done?
Did
you
have
anything
else.
G
G
uh
Maybe
they
would
be
an
ex
that's
an
existing
commission
who
knows
a
lot
about
elections
and
such
and
maybe
they
would
be
a
body
who
would
review
and
determine
this.
That's
just
a
suggestion
of
a
of
a
committee
or
a
board.
I
can't
remember
which
they
are
that
maybe
we
could
invoke
some
additional
responsibilities,
um
but
that's
just
a
thought.
Thank
you.
A
I
Chairman
rivera,
I
almost
did,
but
now
I
did
um
so.
What
I
would
like
to
say
is
that
um
if
we
do
make
these
timeline
changes
that
actually
buys
a
lot
of
time
to
come
up
with
strategies
on
who
makes
the
appointments
as
well.
So
I
guess
I
would
encourage
us
to
to
fix
the
timeline
as
a
priority,
because
I
do
think
it's
we
need
to
have
a
commission.
I
We
do
need
them
to
set
the
the
salary
at
some
point
and
if
we
don't
change
the
timeline
before
the
end
of
april,
there
is
an
argument
that
we
need
them
to
meet
before
april.
So
I
guess
I
would
just
request
that
the
governing
body
change
the
timeline
as
a
priority,
but
um
the
other
changes,
certainly
if
we
can
make
them
off
that's
great.
If,
but
there
would
be
a
lot
of
time
an
opportunity
to
make
additional
changes.
If
we
do
the
timeline
first,
as
well,.
E
On
that
point,
mr
chair,
aren't
we
out
of
somewhat
out
of
compliance
already
given,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
the
way
the
current
ordinance
reads
is
that
it's
supposed
to
meet
no
later
than
april
30th
of
the
year
prior
to
the
election
in
which
a
mayor
shall
be
elected.
So
that
means
that
this
body
should
have
met
in
2020.,
so
we're
in
essence
we're
late,
we're
uh
nearly
12
months
late
on
this
process,
so
I
don't
think
we're
necessarily
strapped
for
time.
E
A
um
So
I
think
if,
if
the
election
were
still
in
march,
then
that
april
30th
date
would
be
great.
I
think
we
could
follow
it,
but
since
the
election
is
now
in
november
and
all
our
timelines
have
moved
up,
we
already
have
people
announcing.
We
already
have
people
starting
to
work
on
elections,
and
I
think
that's
what
makes
it
a
little
bit
sticky.
E
But
on
that
point,
though,
mr
chair-
wouldn't
it
still
be
a
year
prior
to
anybody
announcing.
So
let's
put
ourselves
where
we
were
this
time
last
year
and
the
body
would
have
been
meeting
and
making
a
recommendation
there
would
that
no
candidates
had
announced
by
this
time
in
the
last
year.
So
we
hadn't
run
into
that
campaign
season
challenge,
um
and
I
don't
think
this
was
intentional
in
the
sense
that
there
was
going
to
be
the
date
change
with
the
election.
But
I
think
it
still
works.
E
E
um
So
so
I
I'm
not
trying
to
get
into
the
nuts
and
bolts
in
that
sense.
I
just
think
we're
late
and
we
shouldn't
force
this
through
because
we're
already
late
with
this.
We
shouldn't
rush
this
process
through.
If
we
want
to
get
this
through
right,
let's
make
sure
we're
making
some
good
policy
because,
ultimately
we're
not
against
a
timeline
of
april
30th
of
this
year,
we
were
up
against
the
timeline
of
april
30th
of
2020.,
miss
mccherry.
A
I
I
A
I
Chair
rivera,
we
are
going
to
have
a
request
to
publish
on
wednesday
night.
So
if
there's
changes
to
the
caption,
it
would
be
great
to
to
add
those
that
evening.
So
we
can
include
it
in
the
publication,
so
we
can
have
that
caption
accurately
reflect
any
additional
changes.
So
if
we're
going
to
change
the
appointing
authority
or
the
nominating
authority,
that's
probably
something
we
should
put
into
the
caption.
A
A
E
Mr
charat,
I
would
like
for
it
to
actually
come
back,
um
given
that
we
do
have
some
time
that
a
proposed
hearing
wouldn't
be
until
the
end
of
the
month,
and
uh
given
that
we're
always
coming
back
to
the
argument,
the
work
needs
to
be
done
in
committee,
and
we
have
one
counselor
that
this
is
their
only
opportunity
to
to
hear
this.
In
my
own
self,
I
don't
actually
counselor
v
hill
copler
as
well,
because
I
don't
sit
on
finance.
A
J
E
A
A
A
G
G
C
You
know
resurfacing
a
tennis
court
or
um
taking
care
of
trees
that
need
to
be
replaced
where
a
new
tree
would
be
a
capital
investment,
so
they
can
sound
similar,
but
they
are
different
types
of
money
and
different
types
of
activities.
um
Melissa
mcdonald
is
here
as
well
and
she
can
um
provide
additional
clarification.
G
Okay,
I
well
well
that
could
happen.
I
I
wanted
to
know
um
if
you
have
a
work
plan
for
what's
going
to
happen.
First.
Second,
and
third,
um
like
like
friends
example,
the
ball
feels
there's
ten
thousand
like
where
are
like.
Where
are
you
going
to
start?
Where
are
you
going
to
what
are
the
priorities?
I
guess
I
want
to
ask.
C
Well,
it
looks
like
melissa
would
be
the
best
one
to
answer,
but
I
will
say
that
um
the
this
is
operating
capital
of
operating
funds,
and
so
it
all
needs
to
be
spent
by
the
end
of
june.
So
there's
not
it'll
be
tackled
largely
in
in
parallel,
but
um
certainly
melissa
can
provide
additional
information
about
the
work
plan.
L
L
We
also
need
to
get
some
new
fencing
and
some
repairs
to
our
dugouts
on
the
fencing
there,
because
we've
had
some
vandalism
and
homeless
encampments
in
them,
and
things
like
that.
So
we
want
to
get
that
cleaned
up.
That's
our
top
priority,
um
we're
also
um
coming
in,
and
uh
you
know,
repairing
the
the
soil,
the
infill
soil
things
like
that.
The
next
big
push
is
going
to
be
a
city-wide
cleanup
of
litter.
There's
been
a
lot
of
litter
kind
of
generated,
uh
there's
encampments
and
parks
and
things
that
we
need
to
remove.
L
L
We
all
know
that
that
happens
every
year,
and
so
it
happens
to
fall
in
april
may
june
july,
which
are
our
peak
growing
seasons.
It
actually
goes
all
the
way
into
september,
but
this
is
part
of
a
ongoing
plan
that
was
reduced
when
we
had
the
covid
cutbacks,
um
so
we
were
reduced
and
we're
unable
to
uh
so.
This
is
for
us
to
catch
up
and
stay
on
top
of
those
weeds.
L
So
um
we're
really
looking
at
a
two
to
three
year
period,
where
we
can
really
um
be
intensive
on
the
weeds
and
try
to
reduce
the
seeding,
we're
timing,
it
so
that
it
happens
before
they
seed,
and
we
have
a
number
of
items
that
we're
kind
of
looking
at
how
we
stage
it
out.
But
that's
our
main
focus
is
to
get
the
seeds
before
they
go
to
seed.
G
Thank
you
for
that.
I
wonder:
do
you
have
like,
with
regard
to
the
ball
fields,
do
you
have
priorities
of
which
ball
fields
are
going
to
be
first,
second,
because
10
000
isn't
that
much
so
maybe
you've
you're,
tackling
the
worst
or
or
is
there
enough
for
to
in
this
10
000
to
do
it
all
and
then
the
other
one
is.
G
If
you
can,
I
guess,
with
regard
to
picking
up
litter
and
the
encampments
are
you?
Are
you
just
gonna
start
somewhere
or
do?
Where
are
you
going
to
start?
I
guess
that's
what
I'm
looking
for
like
places
right,
because
I'm
concerned
about
the
mid,
mid,
mid
and
south
side
and
and
that
you
know,
maybe
they
I
know
they
have
needs
and
they
have
issues.
So
it
would
be
nice
to
see
that
done
and
addressed
right
away.
L
Okay,
councillor
beta
um
counselor,
copper.
uh
Yes,
we
um
do
have
uh
that
number
for
the
ball
fields
is
smaller,
because
we
do
have
some
money
that
we've
already
been.
um
You
know
working
on
the
ball
field,
so
this
is
to
kind
of
make
up
some
shortfalls
that
we
see.
You
know
we
had
to
adjust
our
budget.
um
You
know
at
the
end
of
the
uh
before
covet
started,
so
we're
just
kind
of
anticipating
needing
to
do
that.
um
We
are
also
deciding
where
to
pick
up
litter
based
on
a
lot
of
the
crms.
L
um
Certainly,
the
south
side
has
quite
a
bit
uh
there's
a
area
behind
capitol
high
on
off
of
airport
road
that
has
a
tremendous
amount
of
uh
litter
and
illegal
dumping.
So
we're
really
trying
to
link
it
to
where
some
of
the
complaints
are,
so
that
the
bigger
ones
that
we
need
to
clean
up
are
really
getting
those
out
of
the
way.
L
L
L
G
And
I
I
just
want
to
make
a
point
that
you
know.
I
think
it
is
a
good
idea
to
follow
what
the
crms
are,
but
really
what
I'm
learning
is
the
squeaky
wheel
gets
the
grease
and
there's
a
lot
of
people
that
aren't
comfortable
with
calling
city
counselors
or
even
know
the
number
to
call
um
call
it
in
into
the
crm,
and
so
I
well,
I
think,
that's
good.
I
I
do
think
eyes
and
ears
are-
are
also
good,
as
as
city
employees
are
driving
around
and
they
see
stuff.
G
I
worry
that
sometimes
the
more
vocal
get
their
needs
first
and
maybe
they're
not
really
on
the
south
side,
where
they
maybe
need
to
be,
because
I
think,
there's
a
little
bit
more
hesitancy
to
call
in
things.
So
I
would
just
caution
to
take
you
know
to
be
very
familiar
with
our
facilities
and
and
judge
the
where
the
money
goes
based
on
that
as
well.
G
K
K
So
that
leads
us
to
item
c,
which
is
a
request
for
the
approval
of
amendment
number
10
to
the
santa
fe
rail
yard,
community
corporation's
amended
and
restated
lease
and
management
agreement
which
will
increase
the
existing
rent.
Deferral
for
fy21
from
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
with
deferred
amounts
to
be
repaid
from
fy22
to
fy24.
H
Thank
you
chair.
um
I
just
was
curious.
uh
Mr
burnett,
are
you
answering
this
tonight?
Yes,
ma'am?
Okay,
um
I
don't
need
to
go
into
a
lot
of
detail
on
this,
the
it's
we
have
a
current
deferral
of
a
hundred
thousand
and
now
it's
going
to
500
000,
so
it's
400
000
in
one
year
um
I
was
just
curious
and,
and
mr
burnett,
I
don't
really
expect
that
this
is
something
that
you
can
answer.
H
J
uh
Absolutely
uh
mr
chair
counselor
lindell
um
you're,
absolutely
right.
I
do
not
have
uh
a
clear
view
into
the
books
of
the
rail
yard
community
corp,
but
what
I
do
know
is
that
the
original
proposal
actually
extended
the
term
of
the
payment
out
longer
than
what's
proposed.
Now
and
after
reviewing
their
proposal
to
the
city,
one
of
the
items
that
we
felt
like
they
could
do
better
on
was
to
repay
that
deferral
more
quickly.
J
H
um
I
am
I'm
not
surprised
by
that
and
I
actually
didn't
think
that
you
would
be
privy
to
the
information
that
I
was
requesting,
so
um
I
don't
want
to
hold
this
up.
um
I
will
make
a
motion
to
approve
and
I
would
hope
that
um
perhaps
the
rail
yard
corp
could
provide
us
with
an
answer
uh
going
forward.
This
has
got
some
other
stops
to
make.
K
E
K
K
G
M
M
This
is
an
internet
cafe,
program
that
the
schools
have
put
together
as
the
students
transition
back
into
school
and
not
all
the
teachers
are
back
so
they've
set
up
these
internet
cafes,
where
they
need
additional
supervision,
so
um
the
tutors
that
will
be
there
have
agreed
to
be
there
um
on
site.
Okay,
thank.
M
Yes,
um
thank
you
for
your
question,
mr
chair
counselor
vehicler.
There
will
be
background
checks
and
there
will
be
fingerprinted
background
checks
that
we
figured
into
the
funds
that
will
be
needed.
It's
forty
four
dollars
for
a
fingerprint
check
in
the
santa
fe
public
schools
will
be
doing
those,
but
we
will
be
paying.
M
um
Yes,
mr
chair
counselor,
vito
koppler,
thank
you
for
that.
um
The
um
schools
have
volunteer
um
tutors
that
are
in
these
internet
cafes
right
now,
but
they
need
to
be
supplemented.
So
that's
where
our
program
comes
in
and
we
will
be
doing
the
recruiting.
We've
already
recruited
a
few
through
the
earth
care
program.
So
there's
a
few
individuals
who
are
already
ready
to
work
for
these
positions
and
we'll
be
looking
elsewhere
for
from
other
partners
for
additional
workers,
maybe
from
partners
in
education
as
well.
M
Yes,
mr
mr
chair,
counselor,
v
hill
coupler,
the
pay
is
20
an
hour
for
approximately
it'll,
be
20
hours
um
a
week
of
work
and
um
we'll
be
going
until
the
end
of
the
school
year
and
hopefully
extending
it
into
the
summer
and
maybe
even
into
the
fall.
The
need
is
still
there,
even
though
the
teachers
are
coming
back
to
schools.
M
There's
still
300
teachers
in
need
of
additional
assistance
is
what
we're
hearing
from
the
leadership
at
the
school
systems
that
um
they
do
need
they're
transitioning,
and
they
still
need
these
um
proctors
or
tutors
in
in
the
schools.
So
um
the
program
will
continue
through
the
end
of
the
school
year
and
maybe
into
the
summer
as
well.
M
E
uh
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
uh
and
welcome
ms
krish
to
your
inaugural
uh
public
works
utilities
meeting,
um
hopefully
you're
having
as
much
as
fun
as
we
are.
um
I
gotta.
I
guess
my
question
more
so
revolves
around
data
collection
in
regards
to
this
process,
because
I
think
it's
obvious
there
is
a
demonstrated
need
for
for
the
kiddos.
I
think
the
stats
are
you
know.
E
Are
we
going
to
be
collecting
data,
because
I
would
love
to
be
able
to
continue
to
support
this
this
practice,
because
I
do
think
it
is
going
to
be
a
need
that
is
going
to
be
there
and
it's
not
going
to
go
away?
I
think
this
is
a
great
service,
we're
looking
to
provide
to
to
our
young
folks,
our
young
leaders.
M
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
chair
counselor,
garcia.
The
data
question
is
important
and
economic
development,
we're
all
about
data
and
tracking
and
making
sure
we're
measuring
what
we're
doing
to
determine
our
results
and
where
to
go
in
the
future.
So
as
a
pilot
program.
Yes,
um
this
is
a
school
program,
so
I
imagine
they
are
doing
their
own
data
collection,
but
we
also
have
this
program
running
um
concurrently.
M
So
it's
adding
that
extra
grassroots
support
to
our
community,
where
they
speak
the
language
and
they're
able
to
meet
their
needs
and
refer
these
individuals
to
community
resources
to
help
them
with
the
remote
learning
so
that
they
can
get
through
this
pandemic
success
successfully
and
to
also
reposition
um
individuals
who
have
lost
their
jobs
during
this
time
and
who
maybe
need
to
pivot
into
other
work.
So
these
um
community
development
specialists
are
doing
that
work
right
now,
remotely
and
they're,
also
working
with
the
santa
fe
community
college
to
um
work
out.
M
um
You
know,
training
paths
for
these
individuals
who
may
need
um
to
find
other
career
pathways.
So
we
have
that
program
going
this
and
the
data
that's
being
collected
in
that
program
is
through
being
managed
through
earth
care.
So
we
have
a
community
development
coordinator,
who's
actually
leading
that
program
from
earth
care
who
will
be
doing
the
data
collection
and
that
is
very
important
to
us
so
that
that
is
being
done.
E
You
know
it's
it's
it's
not
only
the
students,
it's
the
families
everybody's
had
to
step
in
and
really
uh
help
our
kids
out
this
year
and
um
when,
as
you
know,
kids
are
resuming
especially
here
in
santa
fe,
to
go
back
to
school
in
person.
We
need
to
continue
to
support
those
uh
those,
whether
it's
parents,
the
students,
the
teachers
we
we
need
to
work
in
collaboration
with
our
partners
at
santa
fe
public
schools,
to
ensure
that
our
students
are
successful
and
we're
gearing
them
up
for
success.
E
We
just
don't
want
to
say:
oh
well,
we
are
back
in
school,
figured
out.
We
want
to
be
able
to
provide
the
systems
that
can
support
them,
and
I
think
this
is
a
great
mechanism,
so
I
look
forward
to
to
hearing
back
uh
what
happened
and
how
many
kids
we
reached
and
um
how
we
can
potentially
further
and
and
grow
this
program
in
the
future.
But
uh
thank
you
miss
christian
and
uh
welcome
again
to
to
our
meeting.
That's
all
the
questions
I
have
mr
chair.
K
E
E
K
G
N
N
N
N
O
So
that
is,
that
is
correct,
uh
mr
jones.
It
is
the
the
cogeneration
system,
that
is
the
delays,
mainly
because
the
actual
system
was
designed
and
brought
from
germany,
and
as
soon
as
the
lockdown
started
happening,
we
had
code
generation
equipment
here
on
site,
but
it
couldn't
be
started
up
because
the
startup
personnel
were
in
germany
and
could
not
fly
across
some
of
the
other
delay.
Issues
with
it
were
things
that
related
to
factories
being
shut
down.
K
E
P
K
H
P
P
So
this
will
this
will
go.
This
will
bring
that
conversation
into
the
public
realm
um
and
also
enable
the
governing
body
to
um
really
dive
deep
and
uh
and
and
work
out,
some
solutions
for
us.
I
think,
um
and
perhaps
council
romero
worth
may
want
to
comment
on
this
a
little
bit,
because
at
the
quality
of
life
committee,
we
had
a
series
of
presentations
and
conversations
about
pretty
specific,
not
only
affordable
housing
but
also
uh
human
services
and
sustainability
and
and
other
topics
of
high
priority
and
interest.
P
H
G
G
G
G
G
It
has,
I
think,
it's
25
000,
and
so
I'm
wondering
and
it
this
looks
like
it's
a
regular
part
of
someone's
job
and
if,
if
not,
is
it
is
there
a
temporary
person,
gonna
be
hired
or
is
this
overtime
that's
measured?
And
if
it
is
again,
I
don't
think
uh
those
position.
The
position
in
there
is
flsa
covered.
So
I'm
curious
about
the
fir
and
that's
those
are
my
questions.
Thank
you.
F
F
Our
process
is
very
much
committee
based.
So
we
have
um
this.
This
group,
the
public
works
and
public
utilities
committee.
We
have
quality
of
life
and
we
have
finance
and
we
have
proposals
in
front
of
us
that
can
be
vetted
in
the
expertise
of
our
committees.
So,
for
instance,
one
of
the
recommendations
is
that
we
use
our
utility
fund
surpluses
to
fund
the
affordable,
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund.
F
So
that
recommendation
I
see
as
coming
before
this
group,
because
you
all
have
the
staff
who
are
here
staffing,
this
expertise
of
this
committee
and
who
can
speak
to
our
utility
enterprise
funds
and
how
those
funds
can
and
can't
be
used,
and
so
they
can
do
the
memos.
They
can
do
the
analysis.
They
can
do
the
presentations
about
why
that
is
or
isn't
a
good
idea,
a
good
funding
source
for
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund.
F
How
often
it
would
have
to
be
renewed
what
it
would
do
to
people's
property
taxes
and
that
sort
of
thing,
and
so
the
idea
is
that
these
ideas
that
have
come
forward
to
us
will
go
to
the
subject
matter:
committees
that
we
have
for
us
some
development
of
um
the
the
analysis
and
the
presentations.
And
then
once
that's
done.
F
The
information
that
has
been
developed
by
the
various
committees,
and
so
that
the
resolution
contemplates
a
study
session
and
then
I
think,
hopefully
we
will
be
able
to
see
a
path
um
of
how
we
get
to
the
funding.
We
need
uh
again
so
that
it's
at
a
sustainable,
predictable
um
level
that
we
can
count
on
uh
year
to
year
and
I
think
um
the
the
administration
and
staff
have
recommended
uh
the
funding
that
will
get
by
us
some
time.
F
So
we
we
we
buy
ourselves
a
little
time.
We
also
buy
ourselves
some
time,
while
the
legislature
uh
continues
to
work
on
some
ideas.
That
may
also
be
fruitful
for
us
if,
if
the
cannabis
bill
passes,
that
may
be
a
funding
source,
that
long
term
will
help
us
in
our
goals
to
fund
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund.
So
again,
there
are
a
number
of
ideas.
F
um
We
do
have
a
committee
process
on
the
council
and
the
idea
was
to
use
the
expertise
of
the
committees
in
uh
vetting
these
different
ideas
and
then
so
we
all
have
the
ability
to
participate
in
the
ultimate
path
that
we
pick.
A
study
session
had
been
recommended
and
is
contemplated
in
this
resolution,
so
I
hope
that
helps.
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
G
P
P
Because
a
big
part
of
this
is
also
to
make
sure
that
that
the
public
is
has
a
chance
to
participate
in
these
conversations.
So
um
I
because
I
believe-
and
now
maybe
I
imagined
it,
uh
but
I
do
believe
that
there
is
a
expiration
date
or
a
delivery
date
in
here,
but
maybe
I'm
mixing
this
up
with
the
other
resolution
jesse.
P
You
might
be
able
to
set
me
straight
here,
but
um
the
idea
was
that
for
three
months
these
three
four
staff
people
would
absorb
this
work
into
their
current
low
workload,
because
we
simply
don't
have
staff
or
time
to
bring
anyone
on
board
um
at
about
anywhere
from
a
10
to
30
percent
time.
So
it's
it's
a
really
rough
estimate,
but
um
it
gives
it
gives
an
idea
of
what
what
kind
of
staff
time
would
be
involved.
G
Are
these
employees
that
are
going
to
make
up
these
extra
duties?
Are
they
eligible
for
overtime
at
time
and
a
half?
That's
where
I
can
see
that
that
we
would
report
money
in
the
fir
for
additional
work,
that
we
have
to
pay
overtime
for?
So
I
don't
think
I
don't
know,
I
don't
think
we're
quite
clear
in
the
city,
yet
how
we
define
what
these
salaries
are.
Are
we
just
trying
to
say
you
know
if
we
were
gonna
buy
this
service?
This
is
what
it
would
cost,
but
we're
not
buying
it.
G
P
Chair
beta
counselor
v
hill
couple,
we're
not
asking
for
additional
funds.
um
I
am
glad
you
brought
up
this
issue
because
I
think
um
anytime,
I
haven't
calculated
staff
costs.
I've
been
told
I
need
to,
but
I
think
what
you're
saying
is
probably
also
accurate,
which
is
that
there
really
isn't
truly
a
financial
impact,
it's
more
of
a
just
stretching
staff
thin,
which
is
already
happening
anyway.
So
you
know.
Certainly
this
work
would
be
part
of
my
job
description.
P
It
might
not
be
part
of
a
public
works
person's
job
description,
but
we
do
need
their
expertise,
so
you
know
so
I
I
think
it's
a
juggling
act.
I
mean
we
can.
We
can
revise
the
fir
to
say
no
financial
impact
because
to
your
point
it
isn't
actually
requiring
any
kind
of
budget
increase,
um
and
maybe
just
in
the
narrative
talk
about
what
we
think
the
um
the
impact
in
terms
of
staff
time
would
be.
I
I'm
happy
to
revise
it.
If
that
feels
more
accurate
to
you.
G
Well,
um
you
know
I,
I
think
this
is
certainly
it's
a
bigger
issue
than
this,
and
and
uh
it's
something
I
think
that
maybe,
uh
mr
chair,
you
can
keep
your
eye
on
and
give
some
direction
to
finance
committee
about
how
we
prepare
these
firs,
because
some
ways
it's
different,
some
ways.
It's
well
many
times,
it's
very
different,
and
so
I'm
not
sure
we
still
really
understand
what
what
is
really
being
asked
for
in
an
fir,
um
so
those
aren't
defined
but
uh
miss
lad.
G
E
E
E
E
We
don't
need
to
farm
it
off
to
this,
to
the
committees
and
work
in
silos
and
then
come
back
after
decisions
and
discussions
are
had.
The
proper
process
is
for
us
to
come
together.
Brainstorm
together
determine
what
topics
we
all
feel
is
relevant
farm,
those
out
to
the
committees
and
potential
other,
the
three
main
committees
and
maybe
other
committees.
E
E
I've
I've
uh
uh
as
we've
seen
we're
all
working
in
silos
on
this,
whether
it
is
the
uh
amendment
that
or
the
ordinance
that
we're
going
to
be
talking
soon
after
this
consent
item
um
the
agenda
item
that
we
had
last
week
in
finance
that
we
didn't
pull
today
but
to
allocate
resources
to
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund.
All
of
these
conversations
are
being
held
in
silos
and
that's
not
the
way.
We
address
a
critical
issue
like
this.
We
need
to
work
together.
E
We
need
to
afford
the
opportunity
for
everybody
to
hear
what
everybody
has
to
say
and
when
we
start
out
the
process
with
the
committee
process,
we
don't
afford
everybody
that
opportunity
unless
we
take
the
time
out
of
our
schedules,
that
is
already
committed
to
come
to
these
committee
meetings,
where
it
might
not
involve
us
and
and
so
with
that,
that's
why
I'm
making
that
recommendation
um
so
I'll.
Mr
chair
I'll
make
a
motion
to
have
this
come
back
before
public
utilities
before
it
goes
to
governing
body
for
approval.
G
K
K
E
H
You
want
me
to
answer
that
counselor,
uh
yes,
counselor
in
dell.
Okay,
I
mean,
as
it
exists
right
now.
It
all
goes
uh
to
economic
development.
This
ordinance
just
changes
it
to,
and
you
know
we
don't
know
how
much
this
is
in
any
given
year.
It's
all
dependent
on
whatever
um
net
proceeds
we
have,
but
currently
it
all
goes
to
economic
development
and
this
splits
it
between
economic
development
and
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund.
I
mean
some
years,
it
could
be
a
pretty
sizable
amount
and
some
years
it
might
be
nothing.
E
E
So
with
that,
I
don't
know
how
the
sponsors
feel,
but
I
I
strongly
believe,
let's,
let's,
let's
put
a
hundred
percent-
we
don't
know
how
many
times
we're
gonna
sell
property.
It
might
be
once
this
year,
it
might
be,
might
be
zero
times
this
year,
uh
but
I've
I
of
the
train
of
thought
any
and
every
single
cent
that
we
can
put
in
there.
Let's,
let's
do
it
and
if
we
have
those
bonus
years
where
it's
a
million
dollars
fantastic,
if
we
have
those
years
we're
at
zero.
E
K
Q
Thank
you,
mr
chair
and
council,
garcia
for
the
question.
um
The
funds
that
currently
come
from
land
sales,
parcel
sales
does
fund
our
department,
uh
it's
about
uh
40
of
our
money
and
if
we
are
excluded
from
any
uh
funds
into
our
department,
um
there
is
a
larger
economic
impact
that
comes
from
entrepreneurship
that
comes
from
um
investing
in
businesses
that
grow
that
bring
jobs
to
the
table.
Q
So,
while
I
agree
that
uh
there
should
be
some
muscle
behind
funding
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund,
uh
we
would
be
um
pretty
much
devastating
the
other
effects
of
the
economic
development
of
the
city
uh
so
that
we
can
invest
in
jobs.
We
can
invest
in
business
growth.
We
can
invest
in
making
sure
businesses
survive.
We
can
invest
in
innovation
and
also
that
we
can
invest
in
ways
to
attract
folks
who
can
pay
for
market
rate
houses
and
also
for
the
new
jobs
with
affordable
housing.
Q
So
so
it
would
uh
devastate
us
uh
and
then
the
other
piece
that
I
would
like
to
share
is
that
there
are
other.
There
are
other
funds
that
receive
uh
money,
and
it's
just
that
the
economic
development
fund
is
the
one
that's
taking
its
revenue
to
pay
for
housing.
So
there
are
a
lot
of
other
land,
that's
out
there,
that
is
exempt
from
this
housing
fund
uh
resolution.
So
uh
while
we
will
be
the
most
affected
uh
when
passed,
there
are
other
um
parcels
that
are
for
sale.
Q
G
G
If
you
do
it
right
and
have
good
things
come
your
way
and
and
the
economic
development
department
takes
advantage
of
it,
you
continue
to
get
a
return
and-
and
you
put
that
money
back
in
and
so
it
keeps
keeps
on
giving
so
to
speak.
So
um
well,
I,
like
council,
garcia's
uh
enthusiasm
for
the
affordable
housing
plan.
I
think
we
need
just
a
little
bit
more
on
on
exactly
what
are
we
affecting
in
econ
economic
development.
I
G
G
um
You
know
I
still
with
regard
to
land,
I'm
not
necessarily
in
favor
of
selling
off
city
land.
I
know
that
we
can
do
better.
With
regard
to
what
I
just
said
about
keeping
on
giving.
I
would
like
to
see:
stick
built
homes
on
city,
property,
affordable,
housing
on
city,
property,
and
it
I
think
it's
really
good
to
fund
the
affordable
housing
program.
But
sooner
or
later
we
really
need
houses.
G
We
need
housing,
that's
workforce,
affordable,
and
we
had
talked
about
that.
Some
time
ago
um
about
what
we
could
build,
I
know
I
sat
down
with
miss
ladd
and
we
we
looked
at
all
the
parcels
the
city
owns
and
what
we
could
potentially
build
there,
and
I
know
I've
seen
I've.
I've
heard
mr
dan
werweth
speak
to
how
we
really
do
need
stick
built,
affordable
housing
and
that's
something.
G
I've
always
thought
would
really
work
well
with
with
what
land
the
city
has
knowing
what
I
know
about
what
parcels
we
do
have
all
around
this
city,
so
I
I
get
kind
of
like
leery
of
selling
off
all
our
land
and
then
we
have
nothing
nothing
to
grow
on,
and
so
those
are.
Those
are
just
my
comments,
long
comments
about
your
question,
mr
chair,
about
the
economic.
G
K
K
B
R
uh
Mr
chair
uh
council
lindell
thank
you
and
mr
chair.
I
apologize
for
the
length
of
that
caption.
That
was
that's
a
tough
one
um
as
to
the
the
changes
this
would
make.
First
of
all,
it
would
bring
us
into
alignment
with
the
state
enabling
legislation.
uh
It's
been
changed
twice
and
we
have
not
changed
our
ordinance.
R
uh
The
first
change
would
be
to
eliminate
the
exemption
for
a
for
less
than
three
rooms
in
a
uh
in
a
rental
uh
that
was
put
in
the
original
uh
ordinance
long
before
short-term
rentals
existed
and
was
thought
to
accommodate
one
or
two
bed
and
breakfast
throughout
the
state.
uh
In
fact,
now
it's
been
used
as
a
loophole.
R
Our
city
has
determined
that
it
meant
three
bedrooms.
Other
places
say
it
meant
three
rooms
or
our
city
has
said
it
does
not
mean
three
bedrooms:
it
means
three
rooms.
Other
places
say
it's
three
bedrooms,
it's
been
very
confusing,
so
this
will
clarify
that
by
simply
eliminating
it
and
it
will
generate
uh
we're
guessing
30
to
40
thousand
dollars
per
year
more
in
lodges
tax
collections.
R
The
most
important
part
is
to
uh
change
our
ordinance
so
that
we
can
collect
uh
lodgers
tax
on
all
stays.
That
are
not
permanent
residency
in
the
city.
Someone
who
comes
here
and
moves
to
santa
fe
and
rents
a
place
would
not
play
live
pay
lodges
tax.
But
if
someone
comes
here
for
more
than
30
days
to
to
work
or
to
play,
um
they
would
now
pay
lodgers
tax
from
day
one,
the
income
from
that
we're
estimating
to
be
in
the
range
of
500
to
600
000
a
year
again.
R
They
would
also
apply
to
rentals
that
are
not
currently
licensed
as
short-term
rentals,
because
it
would
mean
that
long-term
rentals
that
don't
necessarily
require
a
short-term
ordinance
would
be
taxed
and
the
tax
from
day
one
through
30
would
come
to
tourism
and
allow
us
to
better
promote
the
city.
Those
taxes
have
not
been
collected
in
the
past
and
from
day
31
on
all
of
that
revenue
can
go
to
a
a
a
use
as
designated
by
the
the
collecting
municipality
and
specified
in
the
ordinance
and.
R
R
Mr
chairman
counselor,
we
we
did
discuss
it
at
the
occupancy
tax
advisory
board
and
they
concurred
with
the
well.
Both
they
concurred
with
these
changes
to
be
made,
and
they
concurred
with
the
new
funds
that
would
be
generated
on
the
31
days
and
over
to
to
go
to
the
they
thought.
The
affordable
housing
uh
trust
fund
was
a
good
use
of
them
because,
frankly,
short-term
rentals,
where
most
of
those
funds
would
be
collected,
have
been
accused
of
of
creating
a
bit
of
an
affordable
housing
problem
within
the
city.
G
R
S
Ordinance,
uh
thank
you.
Andy,
chair,
council,
garcia,
so
the
fir
is
currently
being
routed
through
adobe
sign.
um
I
believe
it's
between
somewhere
between
the
city
attorney's
office
and
the
finance
director.
So
it
is
on
its
way.
uh
One
of
the
one
of
the
issues
was
is
that
we
in
the
finance
department
pulled
both
firs
from
the
state.
T
Okay,
counselor,
if
I
may,
um
I
think
what
brad
indicated
was
accurate.
We
wanted
to
go
through
the
state
legislation
section
by
section
to
ensure,
as
mr
randall
indicated
before,
that
we
are
aligning
our
uh
the
proposed
ordinance
with
the
enabling
state
legislation
primarily
for
these
two
major
changes.
I'm
gonna
ask
brad
to
give
us
an
overview
and
highlight,
because
there
is
significant
financial
impact,
uh
fiscal
impact
for
this
we
will
be
sending
I've
signed
off
on
the
fiar.
T
It's
currently
with
the
city
attorney
for
her
legal
sufficiency
review,
so
she
will
be
um
as
soon
as
she
has
that
jesse
can
go
ahead
and
send
it
out
to
the
committee
members
and
to
the
entire
governing
body,
but
um
there
are
two
ways
again:
the
revenue
and
also
expenses
um
where
this
these
changes
will
impact
the
city.
So
again,
randy
reviewed
with
you,
the
revenue
impact
for
both
of
these
major
sections
and
if
brad,
if
you
can
review
on
the
expenditure
side,
what
the
major
impact
will
be
for
the
city.
S
S
We
are
looking
at
ways
to
automate
that
and
streamline
it
both
for
those
who
have
to
file
it,
but
also
for
those
who
are
at
city
hall
that
have
to
process
it,
but
we
are
expecting
a
huge
inflow
of
new
monthly
tax
returns
and
with
that
there
will
also
be
coming
deposits
uh
and
each
one
is
a
transaction
needs
to.
You
know:
go
through
and
route
it.
um
Hopefully
again,
we
are
looking
at
ways
to
automate
that
um
we're
doing
what
we
can
so
we're
working
on
that
too.
S
But
in
these
two
cases
it's
going
to
require
additional
staff
for
those
who
administer
the
lodgers
tax
and
that's
the
treasury
division
of
finance,
and
so
we're
asked
as
you
and
the
other
one
big
sticking
point
too
is:
is
we're
going
to
be
changing
the
forms,
but
we're
going
to
have
to
reconcile
all
those
permitees
who
do
not
remit,
sale,
uh
lodgers
tax,
but
rather
uh
airbnb,
vbro
and
others
of
the
same.
You
know
business
model
remit
on
behalf
of
the
short-term
permittees.
S
We
want
to
be
able
to
tie
the
permittees
monthly
tax
return
to
the
deposit
we
receive
from
airbnb
and
know
that
each
whoever
they
receive
that
money
from
we
were
paid
from.
So
that's
kind
of
the
goal
and
objective,
and
the
first
case
is
to
ask
for
uh
an
increase,
a
full
staff
position
at
140
000
to
be
funded
out
of
the
lodgers
tax
for
the
treasury.
E
Division,
thank
you
so
much
brad
for
that
update.
um
I.
I
would
really
like
to
see
these
numbers
in
writing
um
because
it
it
is
helpful.
I
mean
when
we
had
uh
mr
randall
talking
earlier
about
an
influx
of
40
000
and
now
you're
saying
it's
going
to
be
a
huge
influx
and
it
in
addition
to
that,
it's
going
to
come
at
the
expense
of
a
salary
position
of
140
000.
S
E
Okay,
thank
you
for
that
clarification.
I
appreciate
it
and
that's
kind
of
makes
my
point
in
regards
to
why
an
fir
is
critical.
We
need
to
see
that
uh
I
know
we're
not
the
finance
committee,
but
I
know
in
this
instance
it's
the
only
opportunity
for
one
of
the
counselors.
I
don't.
I
know
it's
going
to
be
going
to
quality
of
life,
so
I
can
see
it
there.
E
I
didn't
see
any
of
the
documents
for
this
last
night
when
I
was
studying
up
for
this
meeting,
so
I'm
assuming
all
documentation
was
submitted
today,
the
the
memo
and
the
bill,
because
I
was
up
12
o'clock
last
night
and
there
was
no
documentation
for
this,
because
I
was
ready
to
push
this
back
for
for
further
review
because
I
didn't
have
the
sufficient
documentation.
I
mean
to
be
honest
with
you.
I
thought
there
was
no
documentation
on
this
agenda
item
because
I
I
didn't
review
anything
um
so
with
that.
E
I'm
going
to
make
a
motion,
mr
chair,
to
bring
this
back
to
public
works
and
utilities
with
the
fir,
and
that
way,
not
only
the
committee
has
sufficient
time
to
read
the
documentation,
but
also
the
public.
I
think
we
need
to
ensure
that
the
public
is
able
to
view
all
the
documentation
supporting
this
ordinance.