►
From YouTube: Public Works and Utilities for March 8, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
B
A
C
C
A
A
C
A
D
A
A
F
A
A
G
A
Very
good,
no
presentation
or
informational
items
so
now
we'll
go
on
to
our
consent.
Calendar.
The
first
item
is
item
d,
which
was
pulled
by
councilwoman
vihil
koppler.
It's
a
consideration
of
resolution.
2021
dash
to
be
named
a
resolution
designating
the
city
of
santa
fe,
new
mexico.
As
a
b
city,
usa,
affiliate,
councilwoman,
v,
hello,
koppler,.
D
D
E
A
A
C
C
A
D
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
I
wanted
to
ask
uh
miss
wheeler
I
just
as
a
reminder
and
and
a
refresh
of
when
we
discussed
this
extensively
at
uh
the
governing
body,
meeting,
that
when
these
lights
are
converted,
we're
going
to
have
public
engagement
about
uh
the
level
of
kay
I
forgot
kelvin.
I
think
uh
we're
still
on
that
plan
is
that
right.
D
A
K
A
Before
but
I'd
like
to
thank
miss
wheeler
she's,
taken
a
lot
of
emails
and
a
lot
of
comments
on
this
and
has
really
made
sure
that
we
are
following
best
practices
and
really
assuring
the
public
that
what
we're
doing
is
uh
best
for
the
community.
She's
done
an
awesome
job.
So
thank
you
again.
Miss
wheeler.
A
D
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
I
first
want
to
thank
uh
my
co-sponsors
and
counselors
romero
worth
and
councillor
lindell
for
working
together
on
this.
This
has
been
around
the
block
a
few
times,
and
I
appreciate
all
of
the
effort
that's
gone
into
it,
and
I
would
like
to
move
the
substitute
bill
which
is
number
five
in
the
list,
the
array
of
documents.
E
What
is
it
in
this
I'm
confused?
I
thought
that
we
had.
um
This
is
not
the
one
that
I
looked
at
that
I
had
gotten
by
email.
I
don't
believe
so.
Can
you
just
clarify
what
this
one
is,
the
one
the
most
recent
one
that
I
got
my
name
wasn't
on
it.
So
I'm
not
sure
that
this
is
the
one
that
I
have
most
recently
looked
at.
D
That
it
would
in
essence,
recognize
that
staff
may
have
to
meet
with
the
governing
body
in
executive
session,
uh
because
some
properties
uh
require
that
and
the
law
does
allow
for
it
and
that
in
the
event
well
at
in
the
event
that
there
seems
to
be
an
appetite
for
either
selling
or
not
selling
public
land.
That's
being
considered
an
executive
session,
we
come
out
of
executive
session
and
the
governing
body
votes
one
way
or
another.
A
C
C
A
A
Thank
you.
Next.
We're
on
item
k,
a
resolution,
updating
the
terms
of
resolution
2020-29
to
extend
the
duration
of
the
community
health
and
safety
task
force
through
the
end
of
calendar
year.
2021
allow
additional
task
force
members
change
the
task,
force,
composition,
exempt
the
task
force
from
certain
open
meetings,
act,
requirements
and
other
changes
as
necessary.
E
E
E
E
Probably
regroup
on
this,
um
I
see
that
counselor
romero
worth
does
have
an
amendment
that
I
think
helps
it
forms
subcommittees
and
gather
some
public
information.
I
think
that
perhaps
that's
a
better
path
to
go
on.
um
I
really
would
like
whether
it's
the
committee
or
the
counselors
or
who
wants
to
take
the
lead
on
that.
I
really
don't
know,
but
I
can't
support
suspending
the
open
meetings
act,
um
but
I'm
also
very
sympathetic
as
to
what's
happening
here.
E
Maybe
this
um
and
and
maybe
it's
not
just
subcommittees
and
and
public
forums-
maybe
we
hand
this
off
to
another
group
and
and
they
would
like
to
work
on
it,
whether
it
be
something
like
the
um
community
foundation
or
league
of
women
voters.
I
don't
know.
I
haven't
certainly
haven't
ventured
out
uh
and
spoken
with
anyone.
It's
it's
it's
not
my
um
it
wasn't.
It's
not
my
resolution.
I
mean
I
just
I'm
concerned
about
this.
um
So
do
we
have
a
motion
on
the
floor,
chair.
E
A
D
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
um
you
know
I
I
too
can
can
sympathize
with
uh
the
dilemma
we
have
here
and
the
as
as
as
it
relates
to
the
work
of
this
task
force,
and
uh
you
know
it.
I
understand
that,
in
order
for
this
task
force
to
be
effective
at
what
its
purpose
is,
it
has
to
gather
information
from
people
who
have
stories
to
tell
stories
that
that
maybe
require
their
confidentiality
in
order
for
them
to
come
forward,
and
um
you
know
some
of
these
may
be
graphic.
D
Some
of
these
may
include
uh
talking
about,
certainly,
what's
happened
to
them,
but
maybe
implicating
uh
others
either
with
good
intention
or
not
inten,
not
intentional,
uh
and
so
I
think
there
has
to
be
some
kind
of
a
balance
in
order
for
the
committee
to
to
be
effective,
and
so
how
do
you
make
headway?
And
I
was-
I
was
wondering
if
uh
it
it
might
be
possible
and
and
as
councilor
lindell
says,
I
I
I
don't
know.
D
Perhaps
this
might
need
some
some
more
amending,
but
I
would
think
that
we
we
need
to
find
some
kind
of
reasonable
solution.
Otherwise,
this
task
force
will
not
have
an
opportunity
to
clearly
accomplish
its
mission
and
what
it
was
set
out
to
do
in
the
first
place,
if
you
don't
have
people
that
are
comfortable
coming
forward
in
public,
so
I
had
had
an
idea
of
perhaps
uh
administratively
some
way
through
through
the
committee
that
they
um
use
either
the
facilitator
or
the
the
investigators
that
I
know
are
provided
from
time
to
time.
A
M
Okay,
um
no
I'm
not
opposed
to
making
adjustments.
I
think
what
is
important
to
state
is
that
the
um
amendment
that
also
rometoworth
was
proposing
there
were
parts
of
it
that
the
quality
of
life
committee
members
did
agree
upon
that
we
thought
would
be
a
nice
addition
or
that
they
were
important,
but
there
were
language
changes
that
we
didn't
agree
on,
and
so
we
were
waiting
to
see
if
there
was
going
to
be
a
change
with
that
amendment
um
and
it
looks
like
it
hasn't
changed.
M
I
think
it's
important
to
to
note
that
we're
not
talking
about
these
meetings
all
being
in
private.
um
I
think
we
just
need
to
get
to
a
place
where
people
feel
comfortable
and
safe
talking
about
not
just
lived
experiences,
but
also
ideas
and
recommendations
of
things
they'd
like
to
see
changed,
we
have
an
ability
to
do
working
groups.
I
just
think
at
the
beginning
point
when
we're
trying
to
get
to
a
place
where
people
can
trust
each
other
and
not
feel
like
they're
being
constantly
scrutinized
by
somebody.
M
M
We
certainly
want
to
make
sure
that
they
are
heard
and
not
are
fearful
and
not
feel
fearful
that
they
can't
express
what
they
need
to
say.
um
I'm
not
opposed
to
an
idea
of
like
having
those
spaces
to
submit
input
like
counselor,
joann,
b
hill
copler
had
mentioned.
I'm
not
sure
what
that
looks
like.
I
guess,
I'm
still
wondering
from
legal.
M
We
have
been
told
that
this
doesn't
violate
opens
meeting
the
open
meetings
act,
but
it's
actually
um
the
reason
why
this
came
forth
that
we
had
to
do
it
in
this
way.
Is
that
our
own
resolution
on
community
committees,
which
is
in
the
process
of
being
amended
that
that's
where
we
have
to
make
an
adjustment,
not
that
we
were
violating
an
opens
meeting
act
requirement.
So,
unfortunately,
I
don't
think
we
have
any
of
our
attorneys
on
to
be
able
to
discuss
that
further.
D
And
if,
if
we
get
the
advice
that
this
task
force
is
free
to
conduct
business,
the
way
they
are
requesting
through
this
resolution,
and
that
it
is
certainly
legal
to
do
so,
then
I
think
that's
what
we
need
to
hear
and
and
that's
what
uh
we
need
to
hear
and
make
and
make
make
everyone
feel
like
we're.
All
on
the
same
page
and
we're
all
doing
what's
best
for
this
committee's
success
uh
task
force
success
so
that
that
is
all
mr
chair.
N
I'm
sorry
this
task
force
and
most
of
the
advisory
committees
at
the
city
are
not
policy
making
bodies.
Therefore,
the
state
open
meetings
act
requirement
does
not
apply.
There
was
a
resolution
passed.
It's
the.
I
think
it's
called
the
rules
and
procedures
for
city
committees
that
the
governing
body
has
placed
an
additional
requirement
on
these
non-policy-making
bodies
to
follow
the
open
meetings
act.
D
So,
thank
you,
uh
miss
fabian.
I
want
to
ask
um
you
know
you
said
it's.
This
resolution
has
been
reviewed
for
legal
conformity,
but
sometimes
those
don't
really
express
opinions,
one
way
or
the
other
on
the
subject
matter.
So
that's.
What
I
want
to
to
know
is
that
the
subject
matter
is
perfectly
legal
in
their
review,
and
I
kind
of
heard
you
say
that
this
is
a
is
not
really
a
policy
making
board
or
task
force.
N
Chair
councillor
v
hill
coupler,
I
don't
want
to
speak
to
an
opinion
from
the
attorney's
office
about
which
way
this
resolution
should
go,
um
but
legally
this
task
force
could
operate
under
this
resolution.
um
Even
given
its
subject
matter
um
looking
at
public
health
and
safety,
it
is
legally
allowed
to
do
so.
D
C
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
just
want
to
kind
of
echo
the
sentiments
of
councillor
lindell
and
counselor
b
hill
koppler,
that
we
need
to
do
everything
we
can
to
ensure
that
this
committee
is
successful,
and
I
think
we
all
understand
that
the
conversations
being
held
in
these
committees
uh
there
there
are.
There
is
going
to
be
subject
matter
that
that
uh
could
be
traumatizing
it.
It
could
be
an
instance
that
can
be
uh
where
an
individual
implicates
themselves.
C
So
I
think
this
is
where
we
all
need
to
come
together
to
figure
out
how
we
make
this
work
to
be
successful,
um
and
so
I
think
it
would
be
incumbent
of
the
city
attorney
to
at
least
justify
that
they
feel
that
this
will
not
violate
the
open
meetings
act.
I
think,
there's
been
instances
in
the
past
where
um
you
know
the
city
attorney
has
approved
uh
a
resolution
whatever
it
may
be,
and-
and
it's
been
found
that
maybe
we
were
in
the
wrong-
maybe
we
were
not
in
the
in
the
right.
C
um
So
if
we
can
get
uh
that
justification
from
the
city
attorney,
I
would
appreciate
it.
um
I
guess
the
question
I
have
for
the
sponsors
is:
have
we
I
mean
and-
and
I
think
the
answer
is
yes
in
some
sense,
but
have
we
looked
at
you
know
partnering
up
with
community-based
organizations
that
way
it
is
in
the
hands
of
another
entity.
um
The
open
meetings
act
is
then
becomes
a
non-measure.
We
we
are
able
to
have
these
meetings
kind
of
in
that
more
confidential
setting.
C
I
think
that
the
challenge
and
concern
then
might
be
well.
What
do
we
do
with
that
information
because
it
comes
back
to
the
city,
so
I
think
have
we
looked
at
that
and
how
that
might
work
to
advise?
I
don't
know
if
we've
done
that
in
the
past,
but
um
I'm
I
guess,
I'm
looking
to
the
the
sponsors
what
what
might
be
the
best
remedy
if
we
went
that
route.
A
C
uh
Mr
chair,
I
I
sorry
for
if
I
was
a
little
unclear,
I
meant
more
so
with
the
community-based
organization,
a
non-profit
foundation,
some
entity
outside
of
the
city
that
that
hosts
these
meetings,
not
necessarily
moving
forward
with
the
chart
process,
type
style
of
process.
uh
You
know
a
non-profit
that
can
host
these
and
organize
meetings
at
will.
C
um
You
know
whether
it
be
small
groups,
the
whole
group,
whatever
it
may
be,
um
and
and
still
kind
of
keep
the
core
intention
of
the
the
original
resolution,
because
I
think
you
you
you're
spot
on
in
regards
to.
We
don't
want
to
start
over,
but
we
want
to
ensure
that
we
are
developing
a
process
where
individuals
can
feel
safe
and
and
feel
that
there
is
that
trust
built,
because
in
a
process
like
this,
I
think
that's
critical
without
trust,
we're
not
going
to
get
anywhere.
C
M
On
that,
can
I
answer
your
question:
counselor
garcia
councilmember,
so
we
actually
looked
at
the
possibility
of
having
community
led
um
organizations
take
on
this
topic
and,
while
I
think,
there's
probably
much
interest
to
do
so,
I
think
what
the
concern
was
is
that
it
wouldn't
be
held
to.
um
I
guess,
accountability,
the
accountability
level
that
it
would
be
now
the
way
it's
structured
within
the
city
government
um
that
if
there
was
a
group
that
came
up
with
recommendations
that
the
council,
the
council
might
not
be
too
um
keen
on
supporting
any
of
those
recommendations.
M
um
I'm
not
necessarily
opposed
to
that.
I
think
in
other
models
in
other
cities,
they've
done
so
and
and
jennifer
fabian
had
actually
looked
at
those
models,
um
so
there
are
community-led
efforts
in
other
s,
states
where
communities
drove
the
recommendations
and
the
they
held
their
elected
uh
um
officials
accountable.
To
make
those
changes,
I
mean
that's
a
still
possibility.
I
think
one
thing
to
to
note
is
that
some
of
the
members
on
the
task
force
are
already
affiliated
affiliated
with
community
groups
and
organizations
that
care
about
this
topic
so
in
their
own
constituencies.
M
And
the
way
it's
structured
now
I
mean
the
reason
why
we're
changing
it
is
so
that
we
can
have
the
flexibility
of
having
community
dialogues
to
have.
um
I
just
think
that
there's
ways
to
do
both
it's
like
a
both
end,
so
I
don't
know
if
we
need
to
change
the
structure
completely
so
that
it
completely
takes
it
out
of
government
accountability.
M
C
N
C
A
F
Thanks,
mr
chair,
I
was
I'm
just
going
to
respond
to
counselor
garcia's
question
about
the
um
the
legality
of
uh
exempting
the
task
force
from
the
open
meeting
exactly
jen,
and
I
did
discuss
this
with
um
aaron,
um
so
in
terms
of
legality,
aaron
would
not
have
signed
off
on
it
if
it
were
not
allowable
um
and
it's.
I
think
it's
important
to
note
that
we're
not
exempting
the
task
force
from
all
of
the
requirements
of
the
open
meetings
act.
It's
specifically
related
to
public
meetings
and
communications.
A
K
G
uh
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
um
I
stayed
at
a
uh
finance
committee
in
allstate
again
this
evening.
I
support
the
resolution
as
proposed
uh
by
you
and
councillor
vrael.
I
think
you
have
the
benefit
of
having
worked
with
this
task
force
over
the
past
six
months,
or
so.
I
think
the
task
force
has
identified
what
the
concerns
are,
um
and
I
I
defer
to
you.
K
A
H
H
I
do
think,
though,
that
um
it's
our
job
to
take
those
things
that
were
developed
by
the
committee
members
and
run
it
through
our
filters,
and
I
remain
concerned
that
um
what
we
heard
at
quality
of
life
was
that
you
know
there.
There
are
no
parameters
in
the
resolution
that
say
when
the
meetings
will
be
closed
and
when
they'll
be
open,
um
and
we
heard
tonight
uh
that
they'll
be
opened
or
closed
as
deemed
necessary,
and
I
think
that
sets
too
broad
a
precedent
on
this.
H
um
I
think
uh
you
know
I
don't
know
whether
it's
possible
uh
for
the
sponsors
to
work
on
under
what
circumstances
the
meetings
would
be
open
or
closed,
but
I
do
think
if
um
this
is
going
to
go
forward
in
this
way
with
the
ability
to
close
them.
I
think
somebody
needs
to
outline
when
they're
supposed
to
be
closed
and
when
they're
not-
and
we
heard
also
that
uh
you
know
the
only
thing
that
they're
being
exempted
from
is
public
meetings
and
communications.
H
That's
pretty
broad
so
makes
me
a
little
bit
nervous.
The
amendment
that
I
um
talked
about
at
quality
of
life,
I
think,
would
provide
that
safe
space
that
counselor
v
hill
koppler
was
exploring
um
and
allows
the
committee
the
task
force
meetings
to
remain
open.
So
this
is
modeled.
The
amendment
is
modeled
after
the
municipal
drug
task
force,
which
was
very
successful
um
task
force.
H
So
this
this
amendment,
like
the
drug
municipal
drug
task
force,
would
um
provide
for
focus
groups.
uh
It
would
provide
also
the
ability
to
have
community
conversations
and
then
to
uh
those
those
those
stories
that
that
information
could
be
gathered
in
a
way
to
be
presented
to
the
task
force
for
their
work.
H
I
completely
understand
that
having
a
meeting
where
you're,
where
you're
uh
filmed
on
youtube
like
we
are
being
tonight
and
then
it's
gonna,
it's
gonna
exist
out
there
on
the
internet
forever.
um
For
some
of
these
traumatic
experiences
is
something
we
don't
uh
necessarily
want
to
have
people
doing
if
they
don't
feel
safe
and
comfortable
doing
it.
So
again,
my
my
amendment
would
um
provide
for
focus
groups
constituency-based
facilitated.
H
It
would
provide
for
community
conversations.
It
would
increase
the
budget
for
this
task
force.
This
pat
this
task
force
uh
resolution
was
passed
in
july
of
last
year.
We
were
under
much
tighter
budget
constraints.
Then
we
hadn't
learned
everything.
We've
learned
about
chart,
I'm
not
suggesting
that
we
do
uh
the
chart
model
uh
or
spend
the
money
that
we're
spending
with
chart,
but
I
think
we
can
up
this.
I
think
we
have
the
money
now
to
be
able
to
uh
increase
this
budget
to
provide
for
focus
groups
and
community
conversations.
H
It
also
allows
that
this
group
does
not
have
to
um
follow
robert's
rules.
I
think
that's
been
called
out
as
something
that's
that's
difficult
uh
for
the
for
this
task
force
and
and
the
nature
of
what
they're
dealing
with
it
would,
though,
a
lot.
It
would,
though,
keep
task
force
meetings
open
um
because
it
does
provide
a
way
for
people
to
tell
their
lived
experiences
in
a
safe
way.
H
H
You
could
go
and
do
some
some
focus
groups,
and
maybe
there
could
be
other
presentations
that
the
task
force
heard
um
while
you
wait
for
the
work
of
the
focus
groups,
um
so
I
I
am
sympathetic
to
the
fact
that
we
have
a
task
force
that
they
are
meeting
and
that
we
don't.
You
know
we
can't
disband
them
and
start
over,
and
we
don't
want
to
wait
too
long
before
before
we
go.
I
I
am
a
little
bit
concerned.
H
This
resolution
does
call
for
the
ability
to
other
people
to
be
chairs
of
this
committee,
not
the
current
co-chairs.
So
in
terms
of
accountability
uh
from
elected
representatives,
we
may
not
always
have
the
current
co-chairs
that
we
have,
because
this
resolution
will
allow
other
co-chairs
uh
to
be
in
their
place.
So
if
there
isn't
really
clear
direction
as
to
when
they
can
open
or
close
the
meetings,
I'm
concerned
about
the
precedent
that
sets
so
I
I
believe,
um
that's
basically
what
my
my
amendment
does.
H
M
Thank
you,
mr
chair
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
that
when
we
talked
about
this
quality
of
life,
I
think
all
of
us
were
in
agreement,
including
the
co-chairs
that
we
want
to
we're
fine
with
language
that
would
allow
for
community
conversations
and
focus
groups.
I
think
that
addition
makes
sense.
um
We
were
planning
on
doing
that
anyway,
but
if
you
want
to
formalize
it
and
actually
give
us
more
money
to
do
so
awesome,
but
the
rest
of
the
language
that
that
limits
us
from
still
being
able
to
have
meetings
that
are
not
on
youtube.
M
M
This
has
been
like
an
ongoing
conversation
with
the
task
force
about
ways
to
to
support
their
their
work,
their
commitment,
their
um
lived
experience
and
also
make
sure
that
we
have
trust
within
the
group,
and
you
know
it
makes
it
worse
on
zoom.
I
think
all
of
you
know
that
it's
just
the
the
trust
factor
is
I
mean
it
even
affects
us
as
some
colleagues,
so
I
I
just
we
hope
to
get
to
a
place
where
we
can
have
in-person
meetings,
but
until
then
we're
stuck
on
zoom
and
we'll
have
to
like
work
through
that.
G
G
The
way
you
and
uh
councillor
vryal
have
presented
it
because
to
me
a
committee
is
ongoing,
should
be
much
more
transparent
or
completely
transparent
and
have
a
certain
set
of
operating
rules,
whereas
a
task
force
is
put
together
to
solve
a
certain
problem
or
accomplish
something
in
a
specific
amount
of
time
and
to
me,
a
task
force
needs
a
little
more
flexibility
and
shouldn't
necessarily
be
governed
like
a
committee,
and
so
this
is
a
task
forward
task
force.
We're
talking
about
right,
not
a
committee.
A
G
Okay
and
then
again,
given
what
I
know
or
my
experience
with
the
task
force,
is
the
rules
don't
always
apply
and
shouldn't
apply
the
same
as
a
committee
and
a
task
force,
because
we
want
the
committee
to
be
able
to
or
the
the
committee
to
be
ongoing
and
take
on
maybe
longer
term
items
where
the
task
force
does
something
specific
and
because
of
that,
uh
may
need
special
rules
such
as
this.
So
thank
you,
mr
chairman.
M
The
question
um
you
all
have
a
amendment
sheet:
that's
really
hard
to
follow,
but
taking
out
the
word
public
and
conduct
communications
outside
meetings
taking
out,
opens
meeting
open
meetings,
act
and
then
there's
a
whole
section
of
striking
language
about
our
work.
But
you
can't
see
it
because
it
just
says:
pay
a
certain
page
in
line.
C
A
A
G
A
A
Thank
you
next
we're
on
item
m,
which
is
a
request
for
approval
for
amendment
number,
four
to
advance
utility
systems
contract
to
continue
the
upgrade
of
the
utility
billing
division
billing
system
in
the
amount
of
one
million.
Forty
eight
thousand
four
hundred
and
two
excluding
uh
nmgrt
uh
councilwoman
lindell.
You
pull
this
and
miss
jimenez
is
on
staff.
E
E
E
O
O
O
I
realize
that
this
is
started
uh
way
back
in
2013,
um
but
we
are
more
than
ready
and
more
more
than
prepared.
I
have
a
really
good
staff
that
is
just
so
anxious
to
get
this
started
so
that
we
can
start
in
may
and
in
14
months
we
will
have
a
tested
um
ready
to
go
system
for
uh
utility
billing
for
trash.
uh
Excuse
me,
refuse
uh
water,
waste,
water
and
storm
water.
E
O
I
do
truly
believe
that
the
first
phase
getting
a
system-
that's
21
years
old,
into
the
19th
21st
century,
moving
it
to
advanced,
will
get
us
exactly
where
we
need
to
be.
I
will
also
let
you
know,
though,
that
software
does
still
need
to
be
upgraded.
You
know,
on
a
regular
basis,
three
to
five
years
things
just
keep
moving,
um
but
because
we
have
a
21
year
old
system,
it
is,
it
has
been
a
little
bit.
O
um
You
know,
um
bothersome
uh
to
get
this
into
the
the
correct
century
and
and
get
what
we
need
for
the
different
utilities
that
we
build
and
how
the
city
uh
charges
you
know
for
those
services,
um
but
I
do
truly
believe
um
100
that
this
is
where
we
need
to
go
and
where
we
need
to
be,
and
we
need
to
be
there
quickly.
um
But
of
course
done
correctly
is.
O
Unfortunately,
with
this
project,
I
do
believe
that
that's
where
it
was
at
one
point:
um
we
do
and
have
been
and
will
continue
to
um
modify
what
we
need
to
make
sure
that
the
system
works.
If
that
means
bringing
a
policy
forward
to
you
guys
um
to
the
councils
for
approval,
if
that
means,
we
change
an
ordinance
um
so
that
the
system,
um
you
know,
works
better
for
what
we
need
it
to
do,
then
that
is
um
what
I
will
be
doing
in
the
next
several
years.
O
A
O
So
this
is
the
same
system
since
2013.
um
a
couple
of
years
ago.
um
It
did
go
through
mediation
uh
and
there
was
the
reason
that
it
went
through.
Mediation
was
because
there
was
money
that
needed
uh
to
be
added
to
the
contract,
uh
and
that
is
why
um
it
has
taken
a
little
bit
longer
so
that
we
can
negotiate
uh
and
make
sure
that
what
they
wanted
as
an
increase.
We
uh
stuck
to
our
guns
and
didn't
necessarily
do
the
the
large
increase
that
they
were
asking
for.
A
O
uh
No,
it's
definitely
not
of
the
billing
system.
It
is
really
um
with
their
usage
of
their
water
mainly,
um
but
it
can
be
their
sewer
that
changes.
So
we
do
reassess
residential
sewer
in
the
month
of
august
and
we
used
the
water
that
was
used
in
december
january
and
february
as
an
average
for
that
sewer
reassessment.
O
A
C
A
A
F
A
J
Yes,
thank
you
chairman
um
and
members
of
the
committee
um
I
wanted
to
let
you
know
um
some
of
you
may
be
uh
familiar
with
anson
rain,
um
he's
project
administrator
in
public
works
and
he's
leading
us.
um
He
has
been
running
the
teen
center
project
and
um
see
what
else
a
couple
you
know
like
all
the
project
administrators.
He
runs
really
important
projects
for
us.
um
He
gave
us
a
month's
notice,
so
we're
able
to
transition
his
project
smoothly.
J
J
That,
um
I
am
sorry
I'll
apologize
personally
for
not
having
started
this
process
with
the
county.
Much
much
sooner.
We
kept
presenting
to
the
buckman
direct
diversion
board,
but
didn't
uh
didn't
get
the
green
light.
The
you
know.
Well,
the
light
bulb
didn't
go
off
in
our
head.
This
cost-sharing
agreement
was
needed.
um
Both
parties
really
wanted
to
happen.
J
Unfortunately,
the
the
packet
materials
are
missing
from
your
packet
for
wednesday,
because
we
are,
um
the
county
has
gotten
the
um
agreement,
it's
very
short
and
sweet,
um
but
they're
taking
a
look
at
it
and
we
hope
to
have
a
draft
for
your
packet
tomorrow.
um
So
I
just
wanted
to
let
um
this
group
know
since
you're
very
close
to
our
activities
there,
and
I
think
those
are
the
two
um
items
we
stopped
that
I
wanted
to
share.
Thank
you
so
much
chairman.
A
D
Thank
you
uh
chair.
I
I
want
to
thank
regina
and
those
involved
in
trying
to
improve
things.
I
I
had
occasion
since
our
last
meeting
to
attend
two
two
hoa
well
one
hoa
meeting
and
one
neighborhood
association
meeting
that
is
nava
ave
and
los
asekias
and
uh
both
of
those
neighborhoods
are
experiencing
things
that
are
well,
I
would
say,
more
involved
than
normal
association
activities
and
result.
Those
meetings
resulted
in
inquiries
and
requests
for
action
that
seemed
to
reside
in
the
public
works
department.
D
So
you
knew
there
was
something
going
on,
uh
but
they
they
were
very
responsive
to
the
community's
concerns
very
highly
attended
meeting
by
the
neighborhood,
and
I
mean
it's
probably
other
than
in-person
gymnasium
style
since
we
could
meet
back
in
the
day.
uh
This
was
very
highly
attended
on
zoom
on
a
sunday,
and
so
so
uh
again,
thanks
to
the
police
department,
thanks
to
uh
regina's
staff,
for
being
very
um
cognizant
of
what
the
issues
are,
and
I
know
they're
working
they're
working
back
there
somewhere
on
some
arriving
at
some
solutions.
E
Yeah
I
just
I
wanted
to
um
thank-
um
I
did
want
to
thank
director
wheeler.
She
uh
really
guided
us
through
that
whole
street
light
thing
which
wasn't
easy
and
uh
was
a
tremendous
amount
of
work
and,
as
those
things
typically
happen,
I
don't
know
exactly
why
it
happens
that
way,
but
um
it
seems
like
on
the
day
of
council,
things
have
a
way
of
blowing
up
and
um
I
really
felt
like
you
did
an
exceptional
job
with
that,
and
I
appreciate
it.
I
also
did
want
to
thank
uh
miss
jimenez.
E
I
worked
with
a
group
in
town
here
called
vital
spaces,
and
we
raised
over
80
000
and
um
paid
utility
bills
for
people
that
haven't
been
able
to
pay
their
utility
bills
and
it
it
wasn't
like
this
big
bang.
The
drum
um
publicity
thing
we
just
got
the
money
raised
and
um
had
an
exceptional
amount
of
cooperation
from
uh
miss
jimenez
and
also
pnm,
uh
was
terrific
in
that
effort.
E
But
I
just
would
like
for
people
to
know
that
there
are
people
in
this
city
that,
in
a
pretty
quiet
way,
are
very,
very
caring
for
their
people
that
are
their
neighbors
people.
They
don't
even
know
um
just
out
of
kindness.
Knowing
that
a
lot
of
people
are
struggling
right
now,
so
um
that's
the
first
that
I've
talked
about
this
we've
been
on
it
for
a
while,
um
probably
well
over
a
month,
but
um
I
just
thought.
Maybe
people
would
like
to
know
that
that
happens
in
this
community,
sometimes
in
a
quiet
way.