►
From YouTube: Quality of Life Committee Meeting 7/6/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Here,
thank
you
so
much
and
now
moving
to
approval
of
the
agenda.
We
do
have
one
change
which
is
item
e,
is
being
removed
from
the
agenda
and
it
will
come
back
at
a
later
time
to
be
specified
later
any
other
changes
to
the
agenda
from
staff.
B
A
A
B
B
A
For
the
vehicle
yeah
for
the
junk
vehicle
ordinance,
so
I
we
all
voted
for
so
that
should
be
changed.
Instead
of
all
of
our
names
listed
under
abstain,
we
should
all
be
listed
under
four
correct.
B
A
D
Fancy:
okay
I'll
start
over
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee.
Thank
you
for
giving
us
your
time
to
share
the
food
depot's
report
to
the
mayor.
Ensuring
every
child
in
santa
fe
has
access
to
sufficient
and
nutritious
food
prior
to
the
pandemic.
Mayor
weber
approached
me
to
request
the
food
depot
draft
a
plan
to
win
childhood
hunger
in
santa
fe.
Well,
we
took
this
request
very
seriously
and
we're
pleased
to
have
an
administration
paying
attention
to
this
crisis.
The
pandemic
presented
us
with
the
perfect
opportunity
to
research
and
draft
the
report.
D
We
developed
a
small
task
force
and
moved
forward.
I'm
pleased
to
introduce
the
task
force
today,
scott
bunton,
who
will
come
forward
here
shortly
and
give
you
more
detail
at
the
report.
Scott
chair
was
the
chairperson
of
our
task
force
and
is
currently
a
board
member
with
the
food
depot.
Karen
castner,
who
couldn't
be
with
us.
She
actually
has
been
exposed
to
covet.
D
D
What
does
it
cost
us
to
allow
children
to
go
hungry?
We
must
be
compelled
to
act
and
that's
what
this
report
is
all
about,
but
keep
in
mind
5
000
children
as
we
move
forward.
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee.
I
would
like
to
introduce
scott
bunton
to
give
you
the
details
of
the
report.
E
E
Let
me
encourage
you
to
do
that
when
you
have
an
opportunity,
when
the
working
group
that
sherry
mentioned
began
its
work,
it
settled
on
three
criteria
to
guide
it.
We
took
the
mayor's
request
literally
and
seriously
and
decided.
The
plan
must
have
a
realistic
prospect
of
truly
eliminating
childhood
hunger
in
santa
fe.
E
E
E
E
I've
just
described
the
working
group
selected
as
its
primary
plan
component
and
increased
minimum
wage
subtracting
from
the
mit
living
wage.
The
approximate
value
of
assistance
benefits
and
tax
credits
that
are
available
to
all
families
in
this
income
range
yields.
A
wage
level
in
the
22
dollar
to
25
per
hour
range
report
labels
this
a
living
income
minimum
wage.
E
We
propose
that
santa
fe
city
and
county
make
this
range
their
minimum
wage
objective.
We
recognize
an
instant
jump
to
that
level
is
unachievable,
so
we
propose
an
immediate
increase
to
seventeen
dollars
per
hour
as
the
first
incremental
increase.
I
should
note
parenthetically
that
this
report,
which
was
prepared
largely
last
year,
now,
is
behind
the
times.
Mit
has
updated
its
figures
and
these
are
low.
E
The
final
plan
component
is
a
temporary
public
service
work
program
for
able-bodied
adults
who
are
unable
to
find
and
retain
regular
employment,
coupled
with
supervised
and
assisted
regular
employment
search
in
section
6.
We
recommend
a
couple
of
new
programs
and
extending
the
reach
of
a
number
of
existing
programs
to
reduce
childhood
hunger.
E
E
Those
of
us
who
are
here
representing
the
task
force
in
the
food
depot
will
welcome
your
questions.
We'd
be
delighted
to
discuss
this
with
you
to
the
extent
that
this
committee
has
time
to
do
so.
Thank
you.
A
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Thank
you,
sherry
and
scott
for
being
here
today.
Thank
you,
cheryl
for
the
conversation
we
had
a
couple
months
ago,
as
you
were
going
over,
the
report
with
me
a
definitely
appreciate
the
research
conducted.
I
think
it
shows
where
there
are
definite
gaps
in
our
community
and
what
we
need.
What
needs
to
be
done
to
improve
lives
of
those
who
are
struggling.
C
There-
and
I
brought
this
up
during
our
meeting
with
sherry
regarding
a
couple
of
the
different
issues
or
recommendations,
and
so
one
I
guess
I'll
start
off
with
the
the
living
wage
changes
and
proposed
changes,
and
this
is
where
I
didn't
necessarily
see
it,
or
maybe
I
missed
it,
have
we
engaged
the
small
business
community
and
how
that
would
impact
them
and
reason
being
is
that
the
small
business
community
was
deeply
impacted
by
the
pandemic.
C
E
G
E
There
has
been
movement
in
that
direction,
fortunately
in
other
jurisdictions,
but
that
has
overcome
the
city
of
santa
fe's
leadership
in
that
respect.
But
when
that
occurred,
there
were
great
concerns
voiced
by
the
business
community
about
whether
it
would
be
able
to
withstand
this
to
continue
to
make
a
profit
to
continue
to
stay
in
business.
E
E
The
most
recent
one
won
the
nobel
in
2021
for
suggesting
that
this
is
not
as
big
a
problem
as
it
is
often
made
out
to
be
there.
Oftentimes
is
a
reflexive
response
by
the
business
community
and
its
supporters
that
this
is
impossible.
We
can't
possibly
do
this,
but
the
impact
winds
up
being
spread
in
a
way
that
oftentimes
individual
business
owners
aren't
anticipating
and
aren't
foreseen
back
to
your
original
question.
C
Okay,
thank
you
so
much
scott.
I
appreciate
that
I
was
in
college
during
the
raise
in
2004,
so
I
don't
really
remember
the
details.
I
don't
remember
if
it
was
an
immediate
five
dollar
jump.
That's
kind
of
what's
proposed
right
now,
the
immediate
from
12
to
17,
with
the
gradual
increase
to
22
23
it'd
be
interesting.
I'd
like
to
go
back
and
look
at
those
details.
C
C
The
impact
on
our
government
would
be
deep,
given
we
have
a
number
of
employees
that
are
well
below
the
seventeen
dollar
range
they
just
gotta
bump
up
to
fifteen
dollars,
and
so
with
that
being
said,
I
know
that
with
our
fifteen
dollar
increase,
we
had
concerns
of
compression
and
a
salary
compression
and
I'd
like
for
us
to
fully
understand
that
impact
the
compression
impact
of
of
employees,
because
I
think
again,
I
fully
support
us
looking
at
bringing
our
wage
to
a
living
wage,
but
we
have
to
understand
the
impacts
and
how
we
can
make
that
happen
without
having
unintended
negative
consequences.
C
So
with
that,
I
think
that's
where,
on
our
end,
thank
you
for
bringing
this
forward.
We
we
need
to
do
some
work
on
our
end
now
that
you've,
these
recommendations
have
been
made
around
recommendation
number
two
in
providing
assistance
to
family
members.
Was
it
taken
into
consideration
potential
loss
of
benefits?
E
Put
you
in
a
vicious
circle
where
it
is
impossible
to
consider
a
wage
increase,
because
some
people
inevitably
will
lose
benefits
as
a
result
of
that
wage
increase
that
captures.
You
freezes
you
if
you
will
in
ice
at
a
time
when
already
those
benefit
of
pardon
me,
those
wages
are
insufficient
to
enable
the
family
to
meet
its
basic
and
essential
expenses.
E
E
It
is
something
that
we
need
to
grapple
with,
not
only
at
the
local
level
and
irrespective
of
whether
the
city
and
the
county
move
forward
with
the
plan
that
we
propose
it
needs
to
be
grappled
with
at
the
state
level
and
the
federal
level.
Those
cliffs
need
to
be
at
the
minimum
softened,
if
not
eliminated,
we're
aware
of
it.
We
couldn't
completely
absolve
the
plan
of
those
effects.
E
No
plan
to
increase
wages
would
be
able
to
do
that
at
least
not
without
involving
the
programs
that
create
those
cliffs.
In
the
first
instance,.
C
The
state
and
the
federal
government
they're
a
key
player
in
in
any
initiative
that
we
move
forward
with.
I
think
it
was
roughly
32.
I
got
the
number
here.
The
state
invests
a
great
deal
of
resources
for,
for
this
particular
focus
of
child
hunger
issues
and
federal
government.
C
As
I
mentioned,
state
state
government
federal
government
foundation
support
non-profit
support
such
as
the
food
depot.
I
think
this
is
where
it's
going
to
take
everybody
for
us
to
have
some
impact
that
I
come
from
a
social
service
world
where
we've
thrown
the
kitchen
sink
at
an
initiative,
and
we
were
unable
to
make
a
dent
and-
and
I
hate
for
us
to
be
in
that
situation,
where
we
we
throw
the
kitchen
sink,
and
we
just
can't
do
it.
C
When,
when
we
move
forward-
and
I
think
that's
what
I
like
to
understand
more
so
around
next
steps-
because
I
know
the
report
was
requested
by
the
mayor-
I
don't
the
mayor's
not
here-
I
don't
know
what
his
plan
is.
I've
got
my
own
ideas.
Given
this
information,
how
I'd
like
to
see
us
move
forward,
I'm
sure
the
county,
the
state
federal
government,
they
all
say,
hey,
look.
We
can
chip
in.
E
C
Can
answer
my
colleagues
what's
the
next
step?
Thank
you
for
the
report,
but
the
next
step
is,
we
need
to,
I
think,
form
a
task
force
to
begin
to
address
and
set
action
plans
and
develop
subcommittees
and
figure
out.
Okay,
we're
gonna.
This
is
how
we're
gonna
address
challenge
one.
This
is
how
we're
going
to
address
recommendation
two
and
vice
versa,
because
there
was
also
some
recommendations
that
sherry-
and
I
chatted
about
in
our
meeting.
C
C
C
C
Madam
chair,
I
think
this
committee
is
perfectly
suited
to
begin
to
address
this.
We
can
be
our
own
quasi
task
force
to
begin
to
look
at
these
recommendations
and
how
the
city
plans
to
address
it,
because
I
think
all
five
of
us
here
agree
that
the
recommendations
brought
forth
are
valid
and
we,
as
a
group,
can
begin
to
determine
how
we,
though
we
might
be
able
to
make
an
impact
as
a
city.
C
C
I
look
forward
to
the
future
conversations
and
I
think
this
is
just
the
first
baby
step
and
the
many
bigger
gigantic
steps
that
will
be
before
us
and
I
think
the
end
goal
is
to
improve
lives
of
not
only
those
facing
hunger,
but
all
the
other
trickle
impacts
that
communities
face
due
to
hunger,
health
issues
it
can
go
on
and
on,
and
so
with
that.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Thank
you
to
the
presenters.
I
re
really
appreciate
your
time
and
effort
you
put
into
this.
A
Thank
you,
counselor,
and
I
can
speak
to
you
a
couple
of
your
questions
regarding
you
know
some
next
steps,
and
yes,
that's
precisely
why
this
is
here
at
quality
of
life
committee
is.
The
intention
is
really
to
be
pulling
some
of
these
conversations
through
this
committee
so
that
we
can
start
to
have
those
discussions
and
look
at
what
some
of
those
policy
options
are.
So
that's
why
it's
here
today.
A
So
thank
you
and
yes,
this
really
is
the
beginning
of
a
conversation
and,
as
you
mentioned,
there
are
still
a
number
of
different
stakeholders
and
and
feedback
and
opinion
that
that,
as
we
start
to
explore
some
of
these
policy
options
that
would
be
brought
to
the
table.
F
Thank
you,
chair
casa,
sheri,
it's
nice
to
see
you.
We
had
a
very
good
meeting,
but
very
short,
and
thank
you
for
your
work
on
the
report.
It
interested
me
right
away.
I
was
challenged
to
say
that
hunger
is
a
symptom
or
a
result
of
trauma,
and
so
I
just
want
to
shine
light
on
section
six.
F
We
have
generational
trauma
that
we
are
digging
ourselves
out
of
and
we
may
never.
We.
Unfortunately,
it's
a
sad,
sad
reality,
but
because
of
that,
we
often
are
quick
to
move
to
big
initiatives
or
what
we
think
would
be
the
most
helpful
and
they
end
up
being
band-aids
that
have
little
impact
right
and
we
still
see
the
results
of
the
problem,
we're
trying
to
fix,
and
then
it
grows
and
grows
and
grows,
and
it's
because
we're
not
addressing
the
root
cause.
F
F
But
I
do
have
a
lot
of
experience
when
we
are
talking
about
trauma,
and
so
I
was
excited
about
section
six
and
I
know
the
presentation
itself
was
mostly
about
the
increase
in
the
minimum
wage,
because
section
six,
those
are
doable
things.
You
know
we
have
counselor
cassette.
That's
been
working
on
child's
care
with
many
other
teams
from
the
city.
We
have
a
lot
of
people
already
putting
things
into
play
within
that
section.
That
will
actually
address
the
root
cause
of
why
hunger
exists
at
the
level
that
it
does.
F
So
I
just
wanted
to
shine
light.
You
know
to
my
colleagues
on
that
section,
especially
because
that
was
the
one
that
was
more
excited
to
me
as
the
true
solution.
Having
that
those
items
put
in
place
so
that
you
could
ask
any
stranger
off
the
street
how
they
would
access.
You
know,
career
opportunities
or
you
know
with
how
do
you
access
free
food
for
your
kids
during
the
summer
having
our
community
be
very
knowledgeable
on
those
things
is
how
we're
really
going
to
address
it.
F
F
But
I
would
challenge
you
guys
to
have
that
discussion,
because
I,
in
order
for
the
minimum
wage
for
people
to
really
be
successful,
for
it
to
be
sustainable
for
them
to
have
households
that
they
could
sustain,
have
food
on
the
table
that
keeps
remaining
on
the
table.
What
you
shared
in
section
six
is
just
so
valuable,
so
I
just
challenge
you
to
really
pay
attention
to
that
and
emphasize
for
policy
and
emphasize
and
encourage
us
as
your
leaders
to
push
for
programs
that
address
all
the
items
within
section
six.
B
B
Six
were
things
that
we'd
already
talked
about
when
I
was
on
the
food
policy
council,
and
it
also
frustrates
me
because
we've
been
talking
about
them
for
so
long
and
we're
still
not
there
yet
and
and
it's
not
because
of
not
of
the
will
of
the
folks
that
have
been
part
of
the
food
policy
council
over
the
decades,
but
just
well
a
lot
of
different
things
and,
and
I
think,
about
root
causes
as
well.
Really
like
the
overarching
problem.
B
But
although
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
tackle
that,
I
think
about
the
other
kind
of
like
root
causes,
and
that
was
one
thing
that
I
felt
I
wanted
to
see
more
of
in
the
report
about
the
racial,
gender
and
social
inequities.
B
Those
are
the
things
that
actually
leave
lead
to
income
and
resource
in
inefficiencies
and
and
such
so,
I'm
always
interested
in
the
like
those
kind
of
details,
and
I
think
we
would
need
to
show
the
data
like
what's
supporting
and
why
children
are
hungry
and
what
what's
the
breakdown
and
demographics.
Of
what
that
looks.
Like
I
mean
I
think,
that's
important
as
well.
The
one
thing
I
guess.
B
I
am
also
interested
in
next
steps,
because
there's
a
lot
of
different
things
that
funnel
together
that
actually
work
in
unison
that
are
in
the
report,
and
I
think
the
majority
of
us
probably
do
agree
with
the
increase
in
the
minimum
wage
or
the
living
wage
and
just
trying
to
figure
out
what
that,
how
that
all
fits
together.
So
I
guess
I
was
curious.
B
What
you
all
were
thinking
in
terms
of
next
steps
like
what
was
your
vision
for
next
steps
after
the
report
was
complete
and
did
you
like
have
a
plan
of
like
prioritization
or
was
there
something
that
would
help
guide
us?
Because
you
know,
unfortunately,
you
know
this
is
a
report
that
everybody
could
take
from
it
and
put
their
own
ideas
behind
it
in
terms
of
a
resolution
or
ordinance.
B
For
me,
I
would
love
a
more
concerted
effort,
that's
unified,
so
that
we
can
work
together
on
it
because
there's
a
lot
of
different
stakeholders
that
will
be
involved,
some
that
will
be
in
support
of
this
some
that
will
definitely
not
be
in
support
of
it.
So
I
guess
I'm
curious
what
you
all
were
envisioning
for
next
steps
and
prioritization.
D
Madam
chair
members
of
the
committee
counselor
via
ariel
several
next
steps.
I
actually
have
it
on
my
list
tomorrow
to
contact
mayor
webber,
to
ask
him
to
help
us
develop
a
task
force
so
that
we
can
move
forward.
I
want
to
address
two
what
councilor
chavez
said
that
the
the
and
I
know
that
councillor
cassid-
and
I
have
had
this
discussion-
that
to
respond
to
that.
D
It
is
connecting
people
to
the
right
services.
We
know
we
love
the
connect
program
that
the
city
has
and
the
county
has.
We
know
that
it's
affordable
child
care,
it's
affordable,
housing,
it's
affordable,
medical
care.
There
are
lots
of
issues
that
need
to
be
addressed
and
we
recognize
that
so
the
food
depot
is
committed
to
continuing
this
conversation
through
community
conversations.
D
So
we
start
to
tackle
some
of
those
issues
as
well
and
that's
a
part
of
educating
the
community
so
that
we
can
bring
them
along
on
the
recommendations
that
we've
made,
and
that
is
something
that
the
fuji
power
is
absolutely
committed
to
doing.
I
also
want
to
say
that
we
are
committed
to
seeing
this
through.
This
is
not
a
plan
or
a
report
that
was
requested.
We
developed
it.
It's
done
we're
going
to
set
it
aside
and
let
it
gather
dust
that
is
not
what
this
is
about.
D
This
is
about
doing
the
research,
providing
the
recommendations
and
then
staying
until
we
see
a
solution.
D
So
I
want
to
make
sure
that
you're
all
aware
that
we
are
absolutely
committed
to
seeing
this
through,
and
we
are
also
committed-
and
I
know
I
am
as
the
director
of
the
food
depot
committed
to
helping
move
it
along.
So
we
want
to
do
that
next
steps.
I
intend
to
contact
mayor
weber
to
set
up
a
task
force.
I
will
also
talk
to
the
county
commissioners.
They
should
very
much
be
a
part
of
that.
D
I
think
when
we
met
individually
with
some
of
you,
you
indicated
that
you
would
like
to
be
a
part
of
that
task
force.
So
I
want
to
make
sure
that
you're
included
in
that
and
that
we
hear
from
everyone
but
you're,
absolutely
right,
there's
so
many
stakeholders.
So
that's
one
step.
Another
step
is
that
in
a
meeting
with
one
of
the
county
commissioners,
he
asked
that
we
meet
with
the
county
to
see
if
they
have
funds
that
could
look
at
the
impact
of
raising
the
living
wage
on
small
businesses.
D
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
move
forward
with
that.
I
have
it
also
on
my
list
tomorrow
and
anyone
who
knows
me
know
I
always
I
always
have
lists
each
day
of
things
to
accomplish.
That
is
another
one
that
I
want
to
set
up
a
meeting
with
the
county
to
see
if,
in
fact,
there
is
funds
and
we
go
ahead
and
move
forward
on
that,
because
our
task
force,
we
just
didn't
honestly-
have
the
capability
to
do
that.
Piece
of
this
and
again
you've
brought
up
the
business
community.
D
We
absolutely
need
to
inform
the
business
community,
get
their
feedback
and
their
buy
in
on
this,
and
so
those
are
some
really
quick
next
steps.
I
think
it's
not
going
to
happen
overnight.
We
recognize
that
again
it's
going
to
be
looking
at
a
living
wage,
but
also
looking
at
reducing
the
cost
of
living
in
santa
fe.
So
we
are
committed
to
both
of
those
things.
B
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I
yeah,
I
think
I
think
that
kind
of
gave
me
an
idea
of
like
the
direction
you're
thinking
you
want
to
go
or
the
next
steps,
and
you
know
some
people
would
be
like.
Oh
another
task
force,
I
mean
we're
working
on
this,
helping
community
health
and
safety
task
force.
That
obviously
has
been
delayed
because
of
covet,
but
it
takes
a
lot.
B
You
know
it's
like
getting
community
members
and
their
time
and
it's
yeah
it
takes
longer
than
you
think,
and
obviously
these
are
like
issues
that
we
want
to
solve
immediately,
but
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
to
kind
of
steer
that
in
the
direction,
as
you
were
saying,
with
outreach
to
stakeholders
and
having
community
conversations,
I
think
also.
It
would
be
helpful
to
to
talk
with
folks
that
have
already
done
campaigns
around
different
ways
of
thinking
about
our
workforce
and
one
of
them.
B
I
think
about
that's
actually
implemented
right
now
and
I'm
hearing
grumblings
from
some
businesses,
but
having
paid
sick
leave
implemented,
which
is
so
important,
and
what
I'm
hearing
from
some
businesses
is
like
out
of.
I
just
think
it's
so
offensive.
Actually
what
I'm
hearing
and
you
know
some
other
business
owners-
I've
talked
to,
they
said.
Well,
we
think
it's
important.
B
B
I
don't
know
10
years,
probably
on
that
issue
and
it
finally
got
passed,
but
it
would
be
good
to
kind
of
learn
from
them
about
less
lessons
learned
about
that
process
and
what
worked
and
what
kind
of
businesses
actually
were
supportive,
and
why?
Because
I
think
it
also
aligns
very
much
with
like
increasing
the
living
wage
and
what
kind
of
there'll
be
businesses
that
support
it
and
they'll
say
why
and
then
there'll
be
businesses
that
don't
so
I'm
just.
B
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
just
like
from
a
non-profit
point
of
view,
because
I
work
in
the
nonprofit.
I
always
want
to
know
what
those
like,
what
nonprofit
activism
and
their
advocacy
look
like
and
their
strategy,
so
that
that
might
help
us
to
to
like
think
about
what
this
will
be
as
we
move
forward.
The
other
thing
I
think
would
be
important
is
just
understanding.
B
If
there's
any
data
we
can
find
about
what
has
changed
for
centipedes
and
their
quality
of
life.
Since
we've
had
the
increase
of
the
living
wage
from
the
last
time
and
I'm
so
curious
about,
like
did,
we
have
less
people
move,
did
more
people
say
in
santa
fe?
Was
there
was
displacement
reduced?
I
have
no
idea,
I
don't
feel
like
it
has,
but
I'm
just
curious
if
there's
things
that
we
could
pinpoint
specifically
with
that
increase
and
why
it
was
important
for
for
santa
fe
other
than
you
know
more
people
being
able
to
live
here.
B
But
I
don't
know,
have
you
all
run
across
any
data
about
that
yet
because
I
think
it'd
be
so
important
to
see
what
that,
like.
I
don't
know
who
will
do
that
research,
I'm
not
saying
food
depot
has
to
be
the
only
one
trying
to
extract
that,
but
I
think
it
would
be
so
important
to
see
that
trajectory
and
what
has
what
has
been
beneficial
to
santa
fe
since
we've
increased
the
the
living
wage,
and
I
have
never
seen
that
data.
B
B
Administration,
so
I
would
love
to
be
able
to
have
it
be
unified
because
there's,
I
think,
a
lot
of
things
that
we
could
achieve
together
and
with
not
just
our
council
and
with
the
governing
body,
but
also
with
other
stakeholders
in
the
community,
and
that's
all
I
have
thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much.
J
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
I
guess
just
to
to
kind
of
hit
on
that
number.
Five
thousand
children.
It's
heart-wrenching,
to
hear
that
when
you,
you
really
come
to
to
a
realization
of
how
many
people
really
struggle
with
this.
J
I
think
that
it's
important
and,
as
my
colleagues
here
have
have
stated,
that
it's
it's
really
important,
that
we
bring
different
perspectives
to
really
get
to
a
solution,
because
I
think
that's
what
we're
striving
to
whether
it's
17
minimum
wage
expanding
on
programs
that
are
already
available,
pinpointing
with
what
is
working,
get
rid
of
the
stuff
that
isn't
working
and
and
and
really
go,
go
go
from
there.
You
know
I
can.
J
I
can
definitely
sit
here
and
look
at
it
from
the
perspective
of
a
small
business
person,
because
I
am
a
small
business
person
and
I
can
see
how
these
minimum
wages
can
affect
smaller
businesses.
That
really
don't
don't
have
the
ability
to
pay
that,
and
so
you
know,
working
with
them
and
and
finding
programs
that
help
them
to
say.
How
can
you
achieve
that
for
your
people,
because
it
is
important,
you
know
our
our
employees
are
like
family
to
us
and
we
strive
every
day
to
try
to
make
it.
J
We
see
what
they
go
through
as
well,
and
so
you
know
hitting
on
the
point
of
paid
sick
leave
it's
it's.
These
are
all
things
that
again,
businesses
do
need
to
strive
to
to
to
attain
for
their
employees
in
order
to
create
a
good,
cohesive
work,
work
environment,
but
I
I
think
that
you
know
seeing
how
this
affects
the
economy.
J
Overall,
you
know
many
people
will
say:
okay,
you
raise
the
minimum
wage
while
now
a
big
max,
10
or
15,
and
that's
gonna
happen
and
we
see
it
happening
and
so
again,
how
do
we
come
to
the
table
and
and
and
come
up
with
the
best
possible
answer
from
many
different
perspectives?
J
You
know
the
private
private
businesses
that
are
here
in
our
community.
How
does
it
affect
the
city
and
expect,
in
terms
of
you
know
the
compression
as
counselor
garcia,
matt
mentioned
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
and
and
and
how
do
we
make
it
work,
because,
obviously,
the
five
thousand
number
there
is
unacceptable,
and
it
is
something
that
I
think
that
we
can
come
together
as
a
collaborative
effort
to
to
solve
these
issues.
D
Madam
chairman,
I
say
just
a
few
more
remarks:
absolutely
go
ahead
right.
Thank
you.
I've
been
in
this
work
for
more
than
30
years.
I've
worked
in
food
banks
in
missouri,
and
here
I've
been
at
the
food
depot
for
more
than
20
years
and
in
that
30
years
we
have
not
moved
the
needle
on
hunger,
and
I
get
emotional
when
I
think
about
it,
because
it's
unacceptable
to
me
that
any
child
should
go
to
bed
hungry.
D
I
I
was
talking
to
someone
who
grew
up
poor.
We
were
talking
about
the
fact
that
we
both
grew
up
poor
and
were
never
sure
that
there
would
be
food
on
the
table
quite
honestly,
and
he
shared
with
me
that
at
night
they
would
put
belts
on
and
they
would
pull
them
around
their
stomachs
and
pull
them
as
tight
as
they
could
and
it
would
constrict
their
stomach
and
helped
alleviate
just
some
of
the
pain
they
were
feeling
from
hunger,
and
that
story
has
stayed
with
me
and
continues
to
motivate
me
in
this
work.
D
I'm
asking
that
you
all
consider-
and
it
sounds
like
you
are
in
favor
of
moving
forward
with
this.
Please
understand
that
the
report
we
provided
the
research
we
did
led
us
to
that
report.
D
D
I
think
that
we
are
well
positioned
both
in
santa
fe
city
and
county,
but
also
at
the
state
to
make
really
important
systemic
change.
We
have
an
administration
at
the
state
level
that
is
really
looking
at
opportunities
to
end
hunger
and
in
poverty
in
the
state
and
again
we
know
that
santa
fe
is
a
leader.
D
You've
done
it
before.
I
know
we
can
do
it
again.
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
for
giving
us
your
time
this
evening.
Thank
you
for
receiving
this
report
and
giving
it
so
much
thought.
We
appreciate
your
feedback
tonight
and
again.
I
want
you
to
know
that
we
are
absolutely
committed
to
seeing
this
through.
D
A
A
Much
sherry-
and
I
do
want
to
close
by
saying
I
had
the
honor
of
sitting
in
on
a
number
of
the
meetings
with
this
working
group
and
when
sherry
says
that
the
research
led
them
to
this
conclusion.
The
amount
of
research
and
effort
that
went
into
this
was
astounding
and
impressive,
and
I
I'm
not.
A
I
could
not
estimate
the
hours,
especially
because
I
was
not
able
to
partake
in
all
of
the
hours
because
there
were
a
lot
of
them,
and
I
I
was
really
really
impressed
by
the
thoughtfulness
and
the
creativity
and
the
conversations
that
I
was
able
to
listen
in
on
and
really.
A
The
knowledge
that
this
is
not
an
easy
task,
but
a
necessary
one,
so
I
really
just
want
to
give
the
credit
to
to
this
task
force
to
this
group
and
also
to
the
members
that
are
not
here,
because
there
are
a
lot
of
work
and
a
lot
of
thought
went
into
this.
A
A
You
know
this
has
brought
up
the
living
wage,
everything
in
session,
section,
six
and
and
sharing.
I
have
frequently
had
this
conversation
where
I
pull
up
my
hands
and
make
these
little
scales
of
you
know,
there's
how
much
it
costs
to
live
and
how
much
we
make
and
how
do
we
start
to
balance
these
out
and
really
looking
at
the
variety
of
ways
that
we
can,
we
can
come
to
more
equilibrium
because
we
know
we're
not
there.
A
So.
Thank
you
all
so
much.
Thank
you
for
the
report.
I
know
that
we
will
be
continuing
with
these
conversations
and
I
look
forward
to
speaking
with
you
all
again.
A
A
It's
a
resolution
permitting
remote
meetings
for
advisory
committees,
whether
or
not
it
is
difficult
or
impossible
for
members
of
the
committee
to
meet
in
person
when
the
advisory
committee
determines
it
is
in
the
best
interest
of
the
public
to
do
so,
and
we
have
city
attorney,
mick,
sherry
here
to
answer
questions
and
present
and
councilman
vitoria.
You
pulled
this
item
off.
B
B
I
Chairwoman,
cassette
councilwoman
villarreal
thanks
for
the
question
the
way
the
resolution
is
currently
drafted,
it
would
have
to
be
on
the
agenda
to
make
that
vote
and
it
would
be
for
a
100
virtual
meeting
in
the
future,
so
the
idea
being
that
hybrids
do
take
more
staff
resources.
So
this
isn't
necessarily
speaking
to
that
point,
because
hybrids
are
possible
under
the
current
construct,
if
there's
a
if
there's
the
staff
support
available.
I
This
wouldn't
require
them
to
do
so
indefinitely.
They
could
make
that
decision
that
they're
going
to
be
in
for
the
for
the
foreseeable
future.
Virtually
that's
one
of
the
options.
They
could
also
decide
for
a
particular
meeting
that
they
need
need
to
have
a
100
virtual.
So
if
something
came
up
in
between
meetings
where
a
committee
thought
they
needed
a
virtual
meeting,
they
could
have
if
they
needed
to
have
a
vote
on
it.
I
I
suppose
they
could
have
a
special
meeting
and
just
put
that
one
item
on
the
agenda
if
they
needed
to,
but
the
way
it's
written
now
it
would
have
to
be
on
an
agenda,
and
that
would
give
the
opportunity
for
the
public
to
comment
on
that
and
they
would
get
to
hear
from
the
public
about
it
because
it
would
be
on
an
agenda.
So
if
so
say
a
committee
says
we
want
to
meet
entirely
virtually
they
put
it
on
agenda,
and
then
they
hear
from
the
public
saying.
I
I
Gentleman
can't
say
castleman
viol
they
would
still
have
to
show
for
hybrid.
It
would
still
follow
the
open
meetings
act
at
least
the
way
this
is
currently
written,
and,
yes,
that
the
staff
crash
will
support
it
and
the
people
who
appear
remotely
would
have
to
it
would
have
to
be
difficult
or
impossible
for
them
to
appear
in
person.
I
B
If
the,
if
there's
members
that
decide
that
it
would
be
difficult
or
impossible
to
be
able
to
have
the
next
meeting
all
in
person,
that
with
the
committee
would
have
to
vote
for
a
hybrid
for
their
next
meeting
or
their
next,
like,
I
guess
I'm
just
trying
to
think.
Procedurally,
maybe
we
could
talk
about
this
after,
because
I'm
still
confused
about
how
the
task
force
specifically
will
be
able
to
have
hybrid
meetings.
I
That's
one
of
the
vl,
so
this
this
resolution
doesn't
address
hybrid
at
all.
Really
it
only
addresses
100
virtual
hybrid
would
still
be
subject
to
open
mage
act
and
the
open
means
act
says
that
it
has
to
be
difficult
or
impossible
for
a
member
to
participate
in
person
in
order
to
meet
remotely.
I
The
idea
was
to
allow
certain
communities
to
meet
entirely
virtually
and
not
to
add
additional
staff
impact,
so
this
does
that
without
creating
additional
staff
impact.
If
we
were
to
allow
additional
hybrids
without
requiring
open
beans
act,
it
would
have
a
fiscal
impact
and
it
would
impact
the
staff
more
heavily.
B
I
mean
we
act
like
it's
gone
and
I
you
know
everyone's
still
getting
sick,
and
so
I
just
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
how
we
can
continue
to
do
hybrids
even
with
this
change,
because
I
just
hear
that
more
as
as
the
option
that
people
want
so
I'll
use
the
floor,
I'm
just
curious.
If
anyone
else
has
opinions
about
it,.
A
Just
to
clarify,
I
don't
believe
that
this
prevents
a
committee
from
doing
hybrid
if
the
staffing
is
available.
Currently,
what,
with
our
current
open,
currently
how
we're
set
up,
we
could
do
a
hybrid
if
the
staff
support
and
technology
support
is
available.
For
that
am
I
correct,
and
is
that
my
understanding,
correct.
I
A
Correct
and
we've
difficult
or
impossible,
we've
clarified
to
also
be
immunocompromised
needing
to
quarantine
from
covid
and
though,
all
those
things
that
we
have
been
kind
of
relying
on
for
the
last
really
two
and
a
half
years
now,
my
lord,
they
still
apply
correct
chairwoman,
cousin,
yes,
okay,
thank
you
for
the
clarification
counselor
gracie.
I
did
see
a
finger.
Go
up.
B
Answer
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
the
committee.
One
more
thing
about
that.
I
think
what
was
hard
for
us
in
the
task
force
is
that
we
had
to
pull
everybody
to
see
who
is
difficult
and
or
has
difficulty
or
impossible
situations
it
wouldn't
allow
them
to
be
in
person,
and
it's
like
I
spend
more
of
my
time
pulling
our
our
members
instead
of
like
actually
getting
the
meeting
together
and
so
I'm
like
do.
I
have
to
do
that.
Every
single
meeting
the
chairs
have
to
like
see
all
right.
Let's
take
a
vote.
B
I
Councilwoman
for
hybrids,
someone
would
need
to
do
that.
Ideally,
it
wouldn't
be
one
of
the
members
of
the
committee.
I
So
I
think
that's
probably
the
way
it
generally
should
work
is
that
the
committee
member
should
alert
so
if
one
of
you
can't
make
it
to
a
governing
body
meeting
you
let
the
mayor
know
that
kind
of
thing.
Similarly,
I
think
that's
how
the
committees
could
work,
but
we
could
put
out
that
type
of
messaging
to
the
committees
in
advance
of
the
meetings.
I
Let
me
know
if
this
is
the
circumstance
and
we
can
determine
if
we
are
going
to
have
a
quorum.
That
kind
of
thing
so,
rather
than
asking
every
time,
probably
have
the
burden
on
the
members.
B
Yeah,
that's
what
I
was
trying
to
avoid
and
not
put
people
in
certain
situations
where
they
feel
vulnerable
or
you
know,
shunned
because
they're
the
one
person
that
can't
make
it
because
of
their
circumstances
so
yeah,
I
guess
I'll
figure
it
out.
I
just
didn't,
want
it
to
be
the
conversation
every
single
time
at
the
beginning
of
a
meeting
saying:
okay,
what's
our
next
meeting
plan,
let's
do
hybrid,
okay,
why
are
we
doing
hybrid?
Because
people
have
to
alert
us
that
they're
compromised?
I
don't
know
I'll
work
it
out.
B
I
guess
I
just
thought
that
this
change
would
alert
alleviate
all
that,
but
it's
really
just
the
like.
You
said
the
allowing
for
100
virtual
okay.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
councilwoman,
and
just
to
my
understanding
of
this
is
that
there
would
probably
be
committees
that
say
until
further
notice
we're
going
100
virtual
as
opposed
to
every
meeting
voting,
whether
or
not
they're
coming
back
is
that
I
mean
I
guess
they
could,
I
guess
in
theory,
every
single
meeting
they
could
put
on
a
let's
discuss
our
next
meeting
if
they
really
wanted
to,
but
that
that
sounds
like
we'll
leave
that
up
to
them.
A
A
Youtube
capabilities
are
slightly
different
when
we
are
well.
The
advisory
committees
usually
are
not
going
on
youtube.
I
believe
that
we
can
still
record
meetings,
even
if
we
are
in
person.
I
know
that
we've
been
doing
that,
for
example,
at
e-deck,
correct,
rich,
so
and
then,
regarding
this
conversation
around
hybrid,
I
think
that
that's
probably
a
larger
conversation.
A
We
need
to
have
with
I.t
in
the
clerk's
office
around
what
that
staffing
level
looks
like
and
how
quickly
how
much
in
advance
notice
they
need
to
set
up
a
hybrid
end
to
see
if
hybrid
is
a
is
an
option.
I
know
that
we
have
done
it
relatively
simply
at
edac,
and
I
don't
understand
the
mechanism
there,
because
it
seems
to
have
gone
on
without
a
hitch
rich.
Do
you
have?
H
Yes,
ma'am
chair,
that's
correct,
we
have
one
snap
liaison
and
it's
in
our
our
offices.
We
have
a
room
set
up
for
a
hybrid
meeting,
but
we
do
not
go
on
youtube.
So
that's
the
other
piece
that
comes
with
it.
So
we
can
record
the
the
conversation
and
we
also
have
a
stenographer
just
to
make
sure
we
have
the
minutes
correct,
but
we
do
not
go
on
youtube,
but
the
staff
liaisons
prepare
to
put
up
a
mix
of
zoom
and
in
person.
A
Right
that
is,
I
remember
that
the
youtubing
is
the
difference.
So
definitely
sounds
like
future
conversations
to
continue
having
with
this,
but
this
does
not
eliminate
the
possibility
for
hybrid
by
passing
this,
this
only
allows
the
possibility
for
a
committee
to
go
100
virtual,
going
forward
until
further
notice.
A
Okay,
your
woman
casted,
that's
correct
all
right.
Thank
you
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
the
committee
and,
if
not,
what
are
the
wishes.
A
Yes,
yes,
thank
you
so
much
and
moving
on
to
item
d,
this
is
consideration
of
resolution.
Number
2022
dash
will
be
numbered
later
sponsored
by
mayor
weber,
council,
lindelof,
councillor,
casa
and
council
romero
wirth.
It
is
a
resolution
establishing
the
manner
of
appointing
a
charter
review
commission
in
2022
and
identifying
certain
topics
for
the
commission's
consideration
and
attorney.
Mcsherry
is
here
for
this
item
as
well:
councilman
vaderial
for.
B
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
so
got
one
question,
and
I
guess,
since
you're
the
only
sponsor
present
and
ali
is
directed
to
you
on
page
three,
it
lists
some
recommendations
about
topics
to
be
discussed,
and
one
of
those
topics
is
item
g,
whether
a
city
councilor,
who
has
lost
a
campaign
for
mayor
may
retain
office
after
the
inauguration
of
a
new
mayor.
A
A
Speaking
from
my
understanding
of
the
conversation,
but
at
another
time
the
question
around
this
one
is
has
to
do
with
the
equity
that,
if
you
are
a
counselor
that
is
in
that
your
election
is
in
a
mayoral
year.
If
you
want
to
run
for
mayor,
you
have
to
give
up
your
seat.
But
if
you
are
a
counselor
that
is
not
in
a
mayoral
year,
then
you
don't
have
to
give
up
your
seat
and
you
can
simply
run
and
still
retain
your
seat.
A
So
there's
the
equity
between
the
different
members
of
the
council
based
on
your
different
election
years
and
then
the
other
one
has
to
do
with
really
the.
A
That
one
is
my
my
understanding
of
that
conversation
where
I
really
where
I
see
it,
and
why
I
supported
this.
What
has
to
do
with
that
equity
piece
of
if
you
are
a
counselor
who
happens
to
be
in
one
of
the
off
years,
and
you
can
run
for
mayor
without
the
risk
of
giving
up
your
seat,
it's
a
little
bit
different
for
a
counselor
that
is
not
in
and
off
here.
C
Okay,
thank
you
for
that
clarification.
It's
really
helpful,
just
because
I've
never
seen
anything
like
this.
Ever
in
my
20-plus
years,
dealing
with
political
campaign,
races
being
involved
in
politics,
I
think
that
is
just
the
way
the
system
works
and
I'm
absolutely
not
in
support
of
this
topic.
I
understand
the
equity.
F
C
We
see
it
at
the
state
level
where
somebody
has
to
give
up
their
house
seat.
You
see
it
at
the
federal
level.
Somebody
has
to
give
up
their
congressional
seat.
Should
they
want
to
seek
another
office.
You
see
it
all
the
way
up
to
the
presidential
level.
So
I
think
those
are
decisions
that
that
individual
has
to
make,
and
we
should
not
be
forcing
this
rule
upon
folks
who
are
duly
elected
by
their
constituency.
C
You're
you're
basically
punishing
a
constituency
that
the
second
point
of
negative
impact-
I
don't
buy
that
in
in
the
sense
that
you
see
a
lot
of
times
where
there
are
candidates
that
go
against
one
another
and
then,
after
the
fact
one
of
the
candidates
wins
and
they
bring
them
into
their
cabinet
or
their
staff
and
somehow
some
way.
So
I
don't
see
that
negative
impact.
I
see
it
actually
as
a
positive,
because
you
see
somebody
who
can
bring
that
vision
and
passion
to
move
the
city
forward.
C
For
example,
let's
look
at
our
current
presidential
administration
how
many
of
the
cabinet
members
ran
against
biden?
So
I
I
just
don't
see
that
as
a
challenge,
I
think
it's
actually
punishing
your
constituency.
We
duly
elected
their
representative
and
you're,
punishing
them
by
saying
just
because
they
didn't
win
a
race.
You
cannot
be
my
representative
anymore
and
I
don't
as
a
constituent
if
my
counselor
lost
a
race
and
they
were
then
forced
to
give
up
their
seat.
C
It's
it's
not
it's
not
a
valid
argument,
so
definitely
not
in
support
of
that
and
I'll
be
bringing
forth
an
amendment
to
remove
that
that
item
with
that,
I
don't
have
any
other
questions.
Thank
you,
madam
church.
B
I
think
where
it
says
the
commission
shall
make
recommendations
or
shall
include
but
not
be
limited
to
the
following,
and
it
lists
all
these
potentials.
I
think
g.
B
If
it
wants
to
be
brought
up
by
somebody,
then
they
can,
but
I
don't
think
that's
like
one.
That
needs
to
be
top
priority
right
now.
I
think
there's
other
ones,
especially
like
counselors,
being
full-time,
trying
to
figure
out
the
like
structure
of
strong
mayor
government
and
separation
of
powers
and
the
like.
So
I
think
I
would
be
up
for
changing
that
just
because
it
still
could
come
into
the
mix.
B
If
the
commission
really
thought
it
was
a
valid
issue,
so
there's
that
and
then
in
terms
of
membership,
I
was
wanting
to
see
aaron
and
I
talked
about
this
earlier,
but
the
each
count,
city
councilor,
shall
nominate
three
residents
and
I
was
thinking
well.
What,
if
someone
wanted
didn't
want
to
necessarily
give
out
three
options
and
maybe
it
should
say
nominee
up
to
three
residents.
B
So
I
was
curious
if
the
sponsors
had
any
like
other
than
that,
there's
a
pool
to
draw
from
if
they
need
to.
If
there's
some
members,
that
they
don't
stay
on
the
commission
or
they
need
to
add
another
member,
so
was
there.
Was
there
a
reasoning
to
to
say
specifically
three
or
do
you
think
it
could
work
that
would
be
up
to
three
residents
or
what's
kind
of
the
foresight
about
that.
I
Chairman
cassidy,
councilwoman
viriel
and
just
I'm
not
a
sponsor,
so
I
can't
describe
everything,
but
some
of
the
reasons
that
I'm
aware
of
for
this
would
be
to
allow
for
the
diversity
of
the
committee
to
be
appointed,
and
that's
so
one
of
the
criteria.
Later
in
the
that
section
says
they
shall
represent
a
variety
of
backgrounds
and
perspectives
and
so
having
three
nominees
by
each
counselor
allows
more
opportunity
for
that.
I
So
we
don't
know
who
will
be
nominated
by
each
of
the
eight
counselors
and
then
we
need
at
least
we
need
more
than
one
from
everybody
in
order
for
the
mayor
to
appoint
from
the
pool,
so
the
committee
may
notice,
in
the
middle
of
that
paragraph,
it
says
from
the
city
councilors
nominees.
The
mayor
shall
appoint
nine
members,
so
the
mayor
would
be
drawing
for
his
at-large
member
from
the
nominees
from
the
eight
councillors.
I
I
Regular
meetings
that
that
would
be
an
automatic
tender
resignation
which
the
governing
body
could
accept
or
reject,
but
in
that
circumstance
you
would
already
have
another
person
to
fill
that
vacancy.
There's.
Also
nothing
in
here
saying
that
the
same
person
couldn't
be
nominated
by
the
two
city
councilors
from
the
same
district.
I
Right,
there's
no
limitation
on
that,
although
it
would
limit
the
pool
from
which
we
could
create
this
diverse
committee.
So
there's
advantages
and
disadvantages
to
that.
I
suppose.
B
B
So
then
you,
I
guess,
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
the
implications.
If,
if
someone
just
said
oh,
I
I'm
really
picking
two
or
I
only
came
up
with
two
people
that
have
experience
or
want
to
do
this
and
that
they
would
be
penalized
for
not
having
three
other
than
you
don't
have.
You
have
less
choices
in
the
mix,
but
ultimately
the
mayor
would
pick,
and
so
I'm
just
curious
what
happened
because
can't
force
people
to
pick
three
people.
I
Councilwoman
via
this
would
require
that.
So,
if
there's
an
interest
in
not
doing
that,
then
council
should
probably
amend
the
resolution.
A
No,
that
was
really,
I
think,
aaron
really
covered
it.
We
had
initially
we
had
discussed
everybody
nominating
one
person
and
where
we
started
to
falter
was
running
to
make
sure
that
there
was
a
pool
big
enough
for
the
diversity
component,
as
well
as
the
conversation
around
making
it
easier.
If
we
do
have
to
do
replacements
and
making
sure
that
that
pool
is
there
so
providing
that
that
larger
group
of
options
for
the
mayor,
we
thought
would
be
helpful,
both
in
the
balance
that
we
would
like
to
see
as
well
as
just
expediency.
A
You
know
it's
not
something
that
we
want
to
have
to
come
back
to
and
have
the
discussion
of
getting
more
nominees
again,
but
rather
having
a
pool
of
replacements
already
vetted.
G
A
Don't
recall
any
other
portions
of
that
conversation,
but
you
may
want
to
reach
out
to
the
other
sponsors
and
see
if
there
was
other
reasoning
from
their
perspectives
that
I've
forgotten
about.
B
Okay,
I'll
think
about
that
one
more.
I
guess
I
was
just
thinking
that
we
should
allow
up
to
three
options
for
each
counselor,
because
it
doesn't
necessarily
determine
the
diversity,
because
the
mayor
ends
up
ultimately
picking
so
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know,
I'm
still
kind
of
ambiguous
about
that.
One.
A
B
Yeah
well,
we
know
how
that
goes
in
terms
of
appointments.
I
think
it's
kind
of
a
done
deal
when
it
gets
to
us.
I
think,
on
that
same
line
on
line
six
where
it
says
dominate
through
residents
from
the
councillors
representative
districts
or
councillors,
representative
sorry,
respective
district
as
potential
candidates.
It
probably
should
say
because
it's
already
saying
it's
candidates,
it
should
say
each
city
councilor
shall
nominate
three
residents
from
the
council's
respective
district
as
potential
candidates
for
membership.
B
I
H
B
It
okay
that
helps
and
then
on
line
eight
it
talks
about
any
personal
characteristics,
they're
interested
in
sharing.
What
does
that
mean.
I
Councilwoman
vidal,
I
think
what
that's
going
to
is
documenting
their
interest,
knowledge
or
training
in
local
government
or
law
or
having
a
personal
knowledge
of
the
city
government.
So,
basically
saying
you
know,
I'm
I
have
this
background.
I
work
for
the
city
or
I
study
politics
or
I've
been
watching
city
council
very
closely,
and
here
are
the
issues
I've
been
tracking
and
that
kind
of
thing.
B
That's
what
I'd
like
to
actually
have
it
say
instead
of
characteristics,
personal
characteristics
doesn't
mean
something
else
to
me.
So
I
was
thinking
it
should
probably
say
in
any
unique
perspectives,
lived
experiences
and
or
expertise.
They
would
like
to
add
to
the
makeup
of
the
commission
or
something
like
that
because
seeing
their
personal
characteristics
I
could
say:
well,
I'm
a
nmsu
grad.
B
I
I
B
Okay,
well,
I'm
gonna
I'll
think
about
a
amendment
there,
because
I
think
it
doesn't
define
it
so
well
that
they'd
identify
their
voting
district
interest
in
the
process
and
any
personal
characteristic
there,
maybe
just
any
unique
perspectives,
experiences
or
expertise
they
would
like
to
share
or
something
like
that
and
then
the
last
question
I
had
was
about
staff
liaison.
It
says
the
city
attorney
and
or
the
city
attorney's
designee
designee
shall
serve
as
this
definitely
isn't.
I
Councilwoman,
I
think
I'm
planning
to
be
involved
with
this
commission
and
then
the
reason
I
wanted
to
make
it
broad
is
because
I
can
anticipate
that
curse
me
a
lot
of
research
questions.
I
might
assign
specific
attorneys
to
look
on
the
specific
issues,
so
it
might
be
like
someone
looks
at
term
limit
questions
or
someone
looks.
You
know
that
type
of
thing,
so
I
want
to
have
the
ability
to
designate
folks
for
certain
topics.
I
H
B
B
B
I
think
this
has
been
an
ongoing
problem
that
we've
had
for
the
city
structure,
so
yeah.
I
think
overall,
obviously
I'm
supportive
of
having
the
commission
and
kind
of
what
we're
outlining
as
our
duties
and
responsibilities
and
maybe
there'll
be
some
adjustments
to
the
language
as
we
move
forward,
and
that's
all
I
have
thank
you.
F
E
C
B
D
A
G
A
You
loretta
any
matters
from
the
committee
and
matters
from
the
chair.
Our
next
meeting
is
wednesday
july
20th
2022
and
at
6
28.
We
are
adjourned.
Thank
you.