►
From YouTube: Quality of Life for April 7, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Thank
you
appreciate
it
at
501.
I
will
call
our
502.
It
looks
like
the
let's
see,
what's
today
april
7th
meeting
of
the
quality
of
life
committee
to
order
and
if
we
could
get
a
roll
call,
of
course,
counselor
cassette
sanchez.
D
B
Also
here,
thank
you
all
right
with
that.
Are
there
changes
to
the
agenda
tonight?
Yes,
we
are
removing
item.
B
Okay,
and
if
there
are
no
changes
from
committee,
can
we
get
a
motion.
C
C
Yes,
counselor
michael
garcia,.
F
G
B
B
E
Think
I
saw
your
hand
up.
Yes,
it's
on
my
list
and
has
already
been
pulled
and
then
n.
I
would
like
to
pull
as
that's.
Yes,
as
we
are
getting
a
presentation
that
is
relevant,
and
so
I
want
to
pull
it
in
case
that
information,
okay,.
H
Discuss
amendments
that
aren't
in
the
prime
gov
n.
I'm
sorry
m
is
in
magic,
yes,
and
just
to
discuss
amendments
that
are
not
in
our
packet.
B
On
m,
or
on
n,
I'm
sorry
m
is
in
mary.
Okay.
All
right,
I
thought
you
had
pulled
two
is-
is
what
I
was
asking
all
right:
counselor
rivera
anything
nope,
I'm
good.
Okay,
all
right!
So
can
I
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent
agenda
as
amended
to.
B
All
right,
I
think
we
have
a
motion
by
counselor
via
ray
allen,
second,
by
counselor
rivera,
and
can
we
get
a
roll
call?
Yes,.
G
B
From
there
we'll
go
to
approval
of
the
minutes
march
17th
of
the
quality
of
life
committee.
Are
there
changes
to
those
minutes
from
either
staff
or
the
committee?
None
from
staff?
Madam
chair
and
I
don't
see
anything
in
the
committee
so
if
we
could
get
a
motion
future
proof
second,
so
we
have
a
motion
from
counselor
cassette
sanchez,
second,
from
councilwoman
villarreal
and
of
one
more
time
a
roll
call
on
this
one,
of
course,.
C
F
B
Yes,
all
right
on
to
presentations,
so
I
had
asked
that
director
brown
come
and
talk
to
us
a
little
bit
about
the
economic
development
fund.
I
think
it's
very
important
that
we
know
and
and
oh
and
I'm
sorry
and
from
the
city
attorney's
office,
andrea
salazar.
So
thank
you
both
for
joining
us.
I
had
wanted
some
background
on
this
fund.
B
I
think
it's
really
important
that
we
understand
that
this
fund
is
currently
funding
work
in
director
brown's
department,
and
I
think
we
need
to
understand
the
nature
of
that
work
and
the
impact
that
taking
50
percent
of
it
and
putting
it
somewhere
else
will
have
on
any
work
plan.
That's
currently
envisioned
for
the
funds
and
for
us
to
make
sure
that
we
are,
as
we
look
at
at
taking
a
portion
of
this
fund,
that
we
find
the
the
sweet
spot.
So
50
may
be
too
much.
B
It
may
be
just
right,
and
I
I
wanted
to
hear
from
director
brown
a
little
bit
more
context
so
that
we
can
best
make
that
decision.
If
it's,
if
it's
something
that
as
a
as
a
group,
the
governing
body
decides,
is
a
proper
funding
mechanism
for
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund.
So
with
that
introduction
just
wanted
to
give
you
a
little
background
about
why
they're
here
tonight
and
director
brown,
I
guess
I
will
turn
it
over
to
you.
Thank
you.
I
Thank
you,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
council.
Thank
you
for
the
time
I
have
a
couple
slides
that,
hopefully,
will
provide
some
context
on
the
economic
development
fund
and
economic
development
and
andre
salazar
is
with
me
to
talk
about
the
ordinances
sort
of
give
you
some
background
and
then
I'll
take
you
through
what
we
fund
and
what
we
don't
and
what's
what's
in
it
and
what's
exempt,
and
then
some
ideas
around
how
we
are
looking
at
moving
forward
share.
My.
I
I
Okay,
so
sorry
my
kid's
been
playing
video
games
today.
So
if
I'm
slow,
just
tell
me
raise
my
hand,
raise
your
hand
and
I'll
turn
off
my
video,
but
hopefully
this
still
will
work.
I
had
some
issues
with
presentations
today,
so
I'm
going
to
have
andrea
start
off
by
talking
about
the
economic
development
fund
and
the
resolution
and
ordinances
that
into
four
so
andre.
If
you
could
just
take
the
first
two
slides
here
and
just
talk
about
and
then
I'll
talk
about
how
we
disperse
that
money.
J
Good
evening,
so,
first
off
in
1998,
a
resolution
established
the
economic
development
fund.
It
was
later
adopted
via
ordinance
in
2000
for
the
purposes,
and
while
it
is
a
long
paragraph
of
purposes,
this
is
the
real.
J
Rich
is
really
going
to
go
into
that
in
detail,
but
those
are
those
are
really
the
two
pockets
that
this
comes
out
of
and
to
support
activities
which
serve
to
diversify
the
local
economy,
which
don't
have
any
access
to
other
funding
sources
from
the
city.
So
the
main
revenue
comes
from
two
places:
the
one
percent
city
share
of
nmgrt
and
sales
of
city,
real
estate
assets
and
lease
agreements.
J
I
I
So
I'm
sorry
andre
if
you
want
to
take
this.
J
J
J
I
And
then,
to
add
to
that,
keeping
in
mind
that
none
of
these
properties
or
leases
are
providing
any
proceeds
to
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund.
I
So,
as
you
look
at
this
slide
here,
this
sort
of
talks
to
about
the
last
three
years
of
revenue
that
we
have
received
based
upon
our
finance
committee,
finance
department,
has
been
tracking
from
a
grt
standpoint
and
land
sales
or
lease
revenue.
I
As
andrea
said
earlier,
we
receive
our
funding
for
this
fund
from
one
percent
of
grt
revenue
and
then
land
sales
or
lease
agreements,
and
so,
if
you
look
at
this
third
column
here,
you'll
see
that
there
has
been
no
land
sale
revenue
any
windfall
or
revenue
sources
that
have
come
to
the
economic
development
fund.
So
in
2019
there
were
no
land
sales
in
the
2020.
I
The
santa
fe
clay
sale
was
actually
sent
to
the
railroad
fund
and
then
in
2021
we
are
in
the
process
of
selling
the
las
estrellas
area
of
santa
fe
states
and
those
proceeds
were
moved
on
in
2019.
I
Originally
we're
gonna
go
to
the
economic
development
fund,
so
there
are
no
land
sales
currently
in
2021,
where
we
will
see
any
proceeds
to
the
economic
development
fund.
What
you
do
see
here
is
the
grt
revenue
for
the
last
three
years
and
the
2021
is
an
estimate.
As
you
may
know,
we
are
increasing
our
grt
revenue,
so
that
number
may
change,
but
that's
the
grt
revenue
and
it's
not
subject
to
proceeds
to
the
housing
trust
fund.
I
But
the
lease
revenue
is
and,
as
you
can
see,
that
we've
had
some
decrease
in
our
lease
revenue
from
year
to
year
and
I'm
working
on
a
study
with
my
team
to
figure
out
what
the
gap
is.
This
lease
revenue,
but
according
to
miss
lads
memo
that
she
wrote
about
housing
trust
fund.
This
is
where
we
would
start
to
take
money
to
put
into
the
fund
so
of
the
220.
I
So
I
wanted
to
give
you
a
little
overview
of
the
what
we
budgeted
in
the
fun
from
the
fun
it's
a
little
wordy
here,
but
I
can.
I
can
take
you
easily.
There
are
only
seven
categories
of
how
we
disperse
the
fund
based
upon
our
our
angelou
plan
and
starting
with
leader
business
expansion
projects.
I'd
show
the
first
of
this
current
year
budget
and
what
a
budget
for
the
next
year,
business,
acceleration
and
incubation-
that's
really
helping
businesses
grow.
I
We
estimated
this
year
we're
spending
about
225,
000
and
we're
budgeting
for
the
next
year,
250
job
training
and
development.
Those
are
fee-for-service
contracts.
They've
stayed
the
same
strategic
economic
initiatives
that
is
to
build
in
for
an
upcoming
strategic
economic
plan,
which
I
have
budgeted
for
the
next
year
and
then
entrepreneurship.
That's
investing
in
entrepreneur,
activities
to
engage
our
local
community
and
to
foster
growth
and
innovation,
and
then
broadband
architecture
analysis.
I
We
had
originally
had
no
money
in
our
fund
for
a
broadband,
we
did
have
a
capital
outlay
that
has
been
used
for
public
wi-fi,
and
so
I
have
put
in
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
into
budget
for
next
year
to
sort
of
continue
that
public
wi-fi
initiative,
if
I'm
not
able
to
get
money
from
the
federal
government
and
then
lastly,
is
industry.
I
Cluster
development,
we
had
spent
a
lot
on
just
making
sure
that
we
are
maintaining
our
industry
cluster
and
diversifying
economy,
and
I
just
budgeted
thirty
thousand
dollars
for
this
coming
new
fiscal
year,
because
we're
hoping
that
some
of
the
federal
money
will
be
able
to
supplement
that
in
bold
here,
you'll
see
that
my
total
budget
from
the
fund
was
nine
hundred
and
four
thousand
dollars
and
then
currently
for
nine
fy22,
I'm
estimating
974.
I
that
could
change
if
I'm
taking
out
money
for
lease
and
for
the
housing
trust
fund.
So
a
little
breakdown
on
some
of
those
numbers
here
are
the
fee-for-service
contracts
that
we
work
on
the
business
incubator.
This
has
been
a
21-year.
Relationship
of
youth
works
has
been
a
six-year
contract
relationship.
I
Santa
fe
has
been
a
four-year
relationship
of
investment,
and
then
we
had
a
program
mixed
santa
fe,
which
was
a
10-year
relationship,
and
then
we
converted
over
to
a
food
accelerator
which
started
in
2020
that
has
a
four-year
contract.
I
So
this
is
where
our
our
funds
go
to
promote
and
excel
community
and
business
engagement
and
decrease
our
grt,
which
we
can
get
on
the
back
end.
This
is
just
an
example
of
the
leader
program.
Some
folks
know
about
leta,
but
it's
a
it's.
A
local
economic
development
act
which
allows
us
to
work
with
the
state
to
promote
business
and
community
benefits
with
job
growth
and
expansion,
and
we
can
use
these
funds
through
this
economic
development.
I
We
can
use
them
to
invest
in
business
expansion
through
lease
agreements,
constructions
et
cetera
to
help
generate
drop
growth
and
business
expansion
in
the
city,
and
I
will
talk
about
a
little
bit
about
this
further
down
in
my
slides.
But
I
wanted
to
just
give
you
a
sense
of
the
lida
overview,
and
this
next
slide
will
give
you
a
sense
of
where
this
money
has
been
going.
I
So
right
now
we
have
these
six
event:
clients
that
we're
working
on
with
lead
investments
they're,
not
just
one-time
investments.
I
It's
over
a
number
of
years,
the
number
the
amount
that
we've
invested
and
the
number
of
years
that
it's
invested
over
and
so
right
now
we
have
a
v6
meow
with
santa
fe
spirits,
second
street
brewery,
descartes
le
porta
and
marty's
meals,
and
then
right
now,
I'm
targeting
four
business
expansions
in
fy,
22
and
three
new
business
relocation
opportunities
which
I
will
use
some
of
the
fun
money
to
support.
I
So
if
I
am
losing
some
of
our
funding
dollars,
I
have
to
consider
that
from
a
standpoint
of
the
relocation,
but
I
will
try
to
spend
as
much
money
as
I
can
on
the
business
expansion.
G
I
That's
that's!
That's
a
good
question.
It's
from
when
it
started,
and
I
should
have
put
the
dates
in
so
meow.
Wolf
came
on
before
me
and
I
think
it
was
2018
so
2018
to
2028
is
the
span
that
they'll
get
that
so
it's
10
000
a
year,
okay,
okay!
So
so
that's
the
span
of
the
time
period.
So
again,
santa
fe
spirits,
I
think
came
on
in
2018
and
the
brewery
descartes
I
think
was
2019.
I
leberta
was
just
last
year:
they'd
had
an
expansion
and
marty's
meals
was
in
2019
for
10
years.
Okay,
thank
you.
What
was
the
santa
fe
spirits,
one
santa
fe,
spirits?
I
think
it
was
2018..
I
I
So
moving
forward,
as
we
said
that
we
know
that
there's
a
resolution
going
through
that
says
to
share
50
of
our
land
sales,
lease
revenue
to
the
affordable,
housing
trust
fund,
and
I
think
tonight
item
end
we're
going
to
discuss
that
in
detail.
So
I
won't
sort
of
rehash
it
here,
but
but
this
last
piece
here
says
that
approximately
150
000
from
this
fund
currently
for
the
next
fiscal
year,
could
be
extracted
from
our
budget
to
to
be
proceeds
for
the
housing
trust
fund.
I
And
so
I
think
from
the
standpoint
of
what
chairwoman
remember
what
asked
me.
What
do
we
see
money
coming
in
so
that
we
can
make
up,
for
it?
Is
that
right
now
we're
hoping
that
in
the
future
in
the
next
two
years
that
we
are
preparing
the
northwest
quadrant
parcel
for
sale?
That's
approximately
appraisal,
value
of
3.2
million.
That
would
provide
a
greater
windfall
for
us
over
a
number
of
years
and
also
support
the
housing
trust
fund.
I
That
has
not
come
to
the
city
council
yet,
and
it's
probably
another
18
months
in
the
making
before
we'll
be
able
to
really
get
all
the
details
together
and
get
it
out
for
a
possible
private
sale.
I
New
leases
that
are
not
in
the
in
the
rail
yard
airport
are
tear
contenta.
Those
are
potential
sales
revenues
for
us
and
potential
growth
areas.
We
see
that
if
we
invest
the
money
that
could
come
from
the
northwest
squadron
into
new
parcels
to
redevelop
that
could
be
newly
for
us
in
the
coming
years.
From
that
standpoint.
I
So
when
I
look
at
the
potential
growth
areas
beside
these
sales
again
we're
hoping
that
if
we
can
stimulate
the
economy,
it
will
increase
our
grt
and
growth
from
there,
and
so
our
one
percent
number,
which
is
a
static
number,
but
it
will
grow
based
upon
new
sales
from
grt
and
then
reduce
fee
for
service
contracts.
I
This
is
the
probably
the
first
area
that
I
will
have
to
look
at
in
the
coming
fiscal
year
if
we
are
looking
at
up
to
150
000
in
share
revenue
share
because
of
the
contracts.
I
showed
you
earlier
that
we
have
no
other
place
to
put
them,
and
so
we'll
have
to
renegotiate
some
of
our
contracts
in
order
for
them
to
be
whole
for
the
next
fiscal
year.
Some
of
them
are
being
signed
again
large
windfall
from
the
northwest
squadron.
I
I
said
that
we're
looking
at
a
strategy
of
using
that
windfall
to
invest
in
other
areas
of
the
city
to
redevelop
so
that
we
can
have
new
a
lease
income,
and
hopefully,
business
relocation
or
expansion
that
allow
us
to
find
a
more
grt
growth
or
increased
lease
agreements
from
that
standpoint.
I
Lastly,
we
are
are
working
to
become
a
lot
more
stricter
on
the
management
of
our
current
and
future
lease
agreements.
We
have
a
lot
of
lease
agreements
that
are
many
years
old
and
that
we
want
to
modernize
them
so
that
we
have
greater
control
over
them
and
make
sure
that
we
know
what
the
agreement
is,
how
much
money
is
coming
in
and
how
it's
going
to
go
out.
I
So
we
had
a
asset
development,
associate
who's
in
charge
of
lease
management
and
we're
just
putting
it
on
our
munis
system
so
that
we
can
get
a
greater
control
over
our
leases.
Keeping
in
mind
that
you
know
we
have
leases
all
over
the
place.
We
have
little
buildings,
big
buildings,
internal
pieces
staff,
buildings
et
cetera,
et
cetera,.
B
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Thank
you
rich
for
the
presentation.
I
really
appreciate
it
sure
a
couple
questions.
I've
got
on
the
slide
where
you
break
down
the
revenue
of
how
the
fund
is
kind
of
develop.
It
develops
its
resources
into
three
different
categories
and
you've,
given
given
kind
of
a
three-year
overview.
F
I
Manager,
council,
garcia,
that
that's
a
that's
a
question,
I'm
still
sort
of
resolving
and
we
hired
our
new
person
on
just
to
get
to
that
point.
You
know
we
hit
a
pandemic
that
that
dropped
a
lot
and
but
it's
the
least
of
stricter
lease
management.
I'm
trying
to
get
my
hands
around
why
those
lease
numbers
have
changed.
We
didn't
change
the
numbers
so
to
speak,
we've
been
trying
to
increase
or
provide
more
measurement
from
it.
So
I
don't
have
an
answer
for
you
right
now
on
why
that
happened.
I
But
I
I
did
ask
lauren
to
do
some
research
on
that,
so
I
can
get
back
to
everybody
on
the
gap.
F
Okay,
great
still,
with
that
same
kind
of
slide,
you
had
projected
that
leases
might
decrease
by
a
hundred
and
ten
thousand
dollars
if
land
were
to
be
sold.
So
I'm
assuming
that
would
be
because
a
property
that's
currently
being
leased
out.
We
wouldn't
be
able
to
generate
the
revenues
from
those
sales
because
they
the
way
that
they
currently
stand.
Those
the
proceeds
would
go
to
another
source
is
that
is
that,
where
you're
coming
up
with
that
number,
is
that
how
it's
kind
of
arrived.
I
Oh,
that's
a
good
question
manager
counselor!
No,
I'm
saying
that
the
estimate
is
220
000,
but
if
we're
sharing
it
with
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund,
we
would
only
receive
110
000
and
the
remaining
would
go
to
the
housing
trust
fund.
So
it
still
would
be
at
the
220
total.
It's
just
that
we
would
have
to
share
that
that
amount.
I
F
Okay,
so
the
disbursements
from
leases
I'm
just
trying
to
wrap
my
head
around
it,
because
if
we're
selling
the
property,
then
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
how
we're
arriving
at
that
number.
If
the
leases
go
you're
having
to
split,
I
thought
we
were
only
splitting
proceeds
of
land
sales
which
would
fall
into
that
second
category.
F
F
You
you
mentioned
that
historically,
land
sales
have
been
three
hundred
thousand
dollars,
but
on
the
chart
you
showed
us
there
hasn't
been
sales
for
the
last
three
years
and
I'm
and
I
guess,
just
inquiring
what
where
we
got
that
number
from,
because
on
my
time
of
the
governing
body,
we
haven't
sold
any
land.
Well,
we
we
did,
we've
sold
the
santa
fe
clay,
and
so
I
guess
what
what
other
properties
historically
have
we
sold
that
have
generated
that
that
much
in
revenue.
I
Councilor
garcia
there
there
shouldn't
be
I'm
looking
at
the
slide.
There's
there's
no
land
sales
for
300
000
that
that
came
to
my
fund
that
300
000,
I
think
you're
thinking
of
is
the
grt
revenue.
So
that's
the
that's
the
first
column.
It
says
300
000.
I
can.
I
can
show
you
this.
F
F
No,
no,
not
that
one!
No
next
slide.
Maybe
there
you
go
that
you
hit
it
slide:
nine,
okay,
oh
slide,
nine
yeah
and
second
bullet.
Oh.
I
I
see
yeah
yeah
yeah
this
this,
I'm
sorry,
that's
a
good
question.
This
is
from
the
pass
from
alexandre
ladd
when
she
wrote
the
fir
she
said
historically
so
historically
just
means
in
the
past.
We've
had
land
sales
of
about
that
amount.
But
that's
why
I
showed
you
that
slide.
That
said,
over
the
last
three
years,
we
have
not
had
any
any
land
sales
at
all,
but
historically
there
has
been
land
for
sale.
F
Right,
okay
and-
and
I
guess
thank
you
for
that-
and
so
it's
just
a
bigger,
broader
picture.
Historically,
I
was
just
kind
of
wondering
what,
because
I
would
think
you
know,
land
is
a
limited
resource
that
we
have.
We
can't
we
can't
every
year
be
selling
landed
to
me.
That's
not
a
sustainable
source
of
revenue
for
us.
So
with
that
being
said,
what
properties
do
we
have
that
we
might
be
looking
at
selling
that
would
affect
funding
this
particular
fund.
I
F
I
Councilor
garcia:
these
are
the
ones
to
explore.
We
only
have
one
okay,
we
only
have
one
there.
As
I
said
in
the
earlier
slide,
there
are
many
many
problems
that
that
are
I'm
trying
to
look
for
the
slide.
Sorry,
okay,.
F
F
I
F
Okay,
okay,
I
I
I
guess,
I'm
just
trying
to
wrap
my
head
around
if,
if
we're
not
selling
any
properties,
that
would
have
an
impact
on
the
fund,
how
is
it
ultimately
going
to
have
that
negative
impact
unless
it
is
a
property
that
is
being
leased,
that
we
generate
the
the
resources
and
that's
probably
the
one
one?
I
guess
factor
that
if
it
is
being
leased
and
we
do
sell
it-
we're
not
going
to
take
in
those
lease
revenues,
that's
correct.
Can
I
correct
it?
Okay,
cool,
that's
great
yeah,.
I
So
we
we
are,
we
will
be
affected
by
the
loss
of
funding,
because
we're
sharing
50
of
the
lease
income.
F
B
Okay,
other
questions
from
the
committee
counselor
cassette
sanchez
and
counselor
garcia.
Will
you
just
take
your
hand
down
just
so
I
don't
get
confused.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you
very
much,
madam
sir.
Thank
you
so
much
rich
for
the
presentation.
So
I'm
I'm
sorry,
I'm
again
also
just
trying
to
kind
of
wrap
my
head
around
this
for
the
loss
of
revenue.
I
I
mean
I
basically
see
it
in.
We
have
two
options:
there
we
either
decrease
our
spending
in
the
program
or
we
find
other
revenue,
and
at
this
point
you
know
what
is
what
is
likely
to
happen
if
we
do
go
ahead
and
approve
this
ordinance
change.
I
I
So
let's
say:
if
it's
a
hundred
and
ten
thousand
dollars
in
in
potential
fy
22
lease
revenue,
then
I
would
have
to
allocate
that
over
my
fee
for
service
contracts
for
the
next
year,
so
I'd
make
a
notice
to
say
that
you're
going
to
reduce
your
allocated
funding
for
that
year
with
new
amendments,
et
cetera
by
let's
say,
15
000
each,
because
these
are
ongoing
long-term
contracts.
But
that
would
be
a
notice
that
I
have
to
probably
do
in
june
to
them.
D
E
You
terrified
me:
it's
because
my
my
child
is
now
home.
Can
you
bring
up?
There
was
the
slide
that
listed
those
long-term
contracts.
Can
you
please
bring
this
up
yeah.
E
K
I
I
So
here
are
here:
are
our
current
fee
for
service
contracts.
There
are
five
major
ones.
Oh
there's
actually,
there's
four,
I'm
sorry
a
mix.
The
mix
contract
was
ended
in
2019,
but
we
have
four
major
contracts.
The
business
incubator,
youth
works,
make
santa
fe
and
creative
startups
food
accelerator.
There
are
many
more
smaller
initiatives
that
I
work
on.
Those
all
be,
you
know
part
of
this
reduction
allocation,
as
it
relates
to
entrepreneurship
or
sponsorships
of
programs
to
stimulate
the
economy
et
cetera,
but
these
are
major
numbers
that
will
be
reviewed.
I
So
first
first
tranche
will
be
those
those
smaller
initiatives
that
we
work
on
in
our
in
our
office
and
then
the
second
tranche
will
be
these
ongoing
fee-for-service
contracts.
That
will
probably
have
some
reduction
at
some
point.
E
Okay,
thank
you
rich.
I
think,
and
this
kind
of
I
feel
like
it's
continuing
to
boil
down
into
really
understanding
what
does
the
impact
mean
for
the
community,
and
I
guess
that
might
be
questions
for
these.
These
who
we're
funding?
Is
this
understanding
of
what
does
that
mean
for
the
services
they're
provided?
What
are
the
outputs
that
we
are
not
getting,
and
I
think
that
that's
probably
really
important
information
for
us
to
be
be
given,
as
we
are
making
this
decision,
and
so
how
might
we
go
about?
You
know
it's
kind
of.
E
I
don't
want
to
tell
our
funders
hey
we're
cutting
your
funding
if
we're
not
actually
cutting
your
funding,
but
what
does
it
really
mean
if
we
do,
and
so
I'm
curious
how
we
might
start
to
get
some
of
that
information
and
really
understanding?
I
Yeah
so
so
keep
in
mind.
As
I
said,
there
are
two.
There
are
two
buckets
that
I
I
have
to
do.
The
reduction
based
upon
the
forecast
is
that
I'll
look
at
all
these
ad
hoc
initiatives
that
I've
been
doing
to
stimulate
the
economy
and
work
on
recovery
and
then
I'll
go
to
the
service
contracts,
and
then
I
would
have
to
sort
of
say.
I
Okay,
if
I,
if
I
pull
aside,
you
know,
let's
say
I
take
sixty
thousand
dollars
that
I've
used
to
for
ad
hoc
initiatives,
so
that
leaves
me,
let's
say
approximately
fifty
thousand,
so
it
might
mean
that
each
of
these
contracts
will
lose
potentially
ten
thousand
dollars
in
funding.
I
Keep
in
mind,
though,
that
I
might
be
able
to
make
it
up
just
for
this
year
or
next
year,
through
federal,
grant
funding,
so
I
might
be
able
to
supplement
it
with
the
art
funding
so
that
they're,
not
you
know
they
at
least
have
a
year
to
re-uh
we
sort
of
negotiate
or
not
renegotiate
but
really
sort
of
reconfigure
how
they
would
do
their
work
with
a
loss,
so
it
might
be
an
fy23
where
they
potentially
would
be
affected.
E
Okay,
thank
you
for
that
rich
and
then
for
these.
These
ad
hoc
programs
that
you
were
discussing
that
are
intended
to
stimulate
the
economy,
I'm
not
an
economist,
so
I
can't
you
know
I
have
a
hard
time
thinking
about.
Well,
then,
how
do
we
try
to
measure
what
that
what
that
looks
like
in
terms
of
stimulating
our
economy?
If
we
take
away
those
programs,
what
are
we
potentially,
you
know
losing
in
that
sense,
do
you
have
any
thoughts
on
how
we
might
be
able
to
get
to
some
estimation?
I
E
I
Counselor
test
extensions:
that's
that's
a
very
good
question
and
it's
hard
to
extrapolate
right
now,
because
these
smaller
the
smaller
programs
are,
you
know
their
sponsorships
of
events,
their
sponsorships
of
of
chamber
activities,
their
sponsorships
of
entrepreneurship,
and
so
what
could
happen?
Because
they're
soft
and
hot
dollars
involved
is
that
you
know
we
could
have
a
loss
of
social
capital
in
the
future,
because
people
didn't
have
a
way
to
be
able
to
network
together
because
they
depended
on
some
of
this
watch
s
again.
I
We
could
have
a
reduction
in
entrepreneurship
and
innovation
because
we
have
been
sponsoring
ways
for
folks
to
seed
them
to
get
to
that
next
level.
Again,
the
third
way
would
be
that
we
also
might
see
a
a
loss
of
opportunities
for
job
soft
skill
training,
because
we
are
not
helping
to
fund
areas
where
you
know.
I
So
it's
it's
a
little
difficult
right
now
for
me
to
extrapolate
what
that
impact
will
be,
though
I
can
say
potentially
I'd
say
that
you
know
if
you
did
a
20x
for
the
amount
that
I
invest.
That
would
be
what
we
would
probably
bring
back
in
in
economic
impact
and
economic
revenue
for
for
the
city.
So
if
I'm
investing,
you
know,
60
000,
you
know
we're
talking
1.2,
so
that
would
be
where
I'd
say
from
my
standpoint.
That
would
give
you
a
sense
of
of
what
the
impact
might
be.
I
Yes,
potentially
we
could
cover
with
federal
or
both
of
these,
like
the
first
tranche.
We
could
probably
cover
with
federal
dollars
for
the
next
fiscal
year
and
then
in
the
fy
23
we'd
have
to
sort
of
figure
out.
Are
we
about
to
make
that
land
sale
of
northwest
quadrant?
That
gives
us
a
windfall
to
sort
of
sustain
it,
and
then
these
contracts
again,
I
could
make
up
for
the
balance
with
federal
dollars.
If
we
have
to,
you
know,
reduce
them
down.
I
So
so
it's
not
a
it's,
not
an
immediate
concern,
but
it
is
a
future
concern
as
we
pull
out
of
the
economic
malaise.
E
And
then,
in
terms
of,
like
other
funding
sources,
other
partnerships
that
we
might
explore,
I
know
with
some
of
the
you
know:
public
health
work
and
community
services
work
that
there
are
different
foundations
and
philanthropic
organizations
that
provide
that
assistance
are
there.
When
are
we
already
working
with
some?
Maybe
we're
tapped
out,
but
two?
If
not,
are
there
potential
other
opportunities
that
we
could
explore?
Partnerships.
I
Manager,
councillor
cassie
sanchez.
Yes,
that's
very
good
point
that
that
we
can
rely
on
some
of
the
foundations
and
nonprofits,
keep
in
mind
that
some
of
these
foundations
and
nonprofits
are
already
investing
in
these.
Basically
in
the
fee
for
service
contracts,
they're,
not
necessarily
investing
in
the
ad
hoc
pieces,
that's
us
using
our
plan
to
sort
of
figure
out
ways
to
stimulate
the
economy,
so
we
would.
We
would
also
want
to
go
back
to
them
to
say.
I
Is
there
a
way
to
you
know
capture
that
when
that
that
loss,
while
we're
trying
to
reconfigure
how
the
city
can
you
know,
keep
up
with
the
the
number
we
thought
was
a
good
estimate
to
keep
some
of
these
programs
whole.
E
Okay,
thank
you
for
that.
I
I
appreciate
it
definitely
a
pretty
complex
and
nuanced
and
intricate
decision
and
a
lot
of
ripples
that
come
from
it.
So
I
really
appreciate
you
taking
the
time
to
explore
this
with
us.
I
don't
believe
I
have
any
further
questions
or
barking
animals
at
the
moment.
So
thank
you
so
much.
H
Thank
you,
councilwoman
viara.
All
you
have
your
hand
up.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Thanks,
rich
for
the
presentation.
Can
we
go
back
to
that
fee
for
services
contract
slide?
H
I
just
want
to
break
that
down
even
further,
because
there
was
a
point
not
not
even
just
last
year,
but
when
we
had
to
tighten
our
belts
on
our
budget.
These
groups
did
get
cuts,
yes,
and
so
I'm
wondering
if
the
amounts
you're
showing
now
are
those
the
original
amounts
or
what
we
ended
up.
Reducing
their
contracts.
I
I
We
did
not
reinstate
the
youth
workers,
one
one,
because
we
had
run
out
of
funding
ourselves,
but
we
are
in
the
process
of
sending
an
rfp
out
for
that,
but
keep
in
mind
that
on
the
youth
work
side
we
did
fund
them
through
our
emergency
food
program,
so
they
were
able
to
continue
their
food
service
job
training
program
through
the
pandemic
food
service
program
that
we
did
so
we
used
fema
funding
to
supplement
them,
but
but
we
did
ultimately
get
our
funding
back.
I
I
think
it
was
in
july
and
so
we're
in
about
we're
actually
still
trying
to
renew
contracts
going
forward
so
fy22.
I
These
are
the
estimates
for
for
sfbi
and
youth
works
and
make,
and
then
creative
startups
has
already
have
been
been
going.
This
is
their
second
cohort
of
the
food
employer,
so
they
have
been
going
strong,
but
the
other
two
large
ones
for
the
business.
I
H
I
It's
it's
a
possibility,
as
I
said
I
talked
to
when
I
was
explaining
to
counselor
sanchez-
is
that
is
that
I'm
looking
for
all
kinds
of
ad
hoc
ways
to
stimulate
the
economy
and
one
of
the
things
that
will
be
lost
as
we
as
we
look
at
reduced
revenue
is
business,
social,
networking
and
so
mix
was
a
very
large
component
and
a
best
in
class
for
business,
social
networking,
and
so
I
put
this
in
there
because
it's
just
one
of
the
ways
where
in
2019
we
were
doing
fees
for
service
contracts
that
it
might
come
back
in
the
new
year.
I
H
H
I
think
that
is
something
that's
important,
but
I
guess
what
I'm
saying
is
that
by
reducing
these
by
a
small
percentage,
it
would
be
interesting
for,
for
that
conversation
to
be
had
with
these
groups
to
make
the
connection
to
housing
and
the
need
for
housing,
and
the
fact
is
that
we're
investing
in
potential
housing
initiatives
through
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund
and
that's
where
it's
going
so
it
kind.
G
H
They're
all
connected
you,
wouldn't
if
we
weren't
able
to
keep
people
here
and
actually
have
a
housing
viable
housing,
then
none
of
this
matters,
in
my
opinion,
so
they're
connected,
and
I
guess
this
wouldn't
be
the
only
area
that
we
could
potentially
make
reductions.
There's
other
areas
that
you
listed.
So
it's
not
like
these
folks
should
necessarily
worry.
We
haven't
funded
mixed
santa
fe
at
that
level.
Anyway,
yeah.
I
guess
I
just
don't
see
it
as
like
fee
for
service
contracts,
they're
all
going
to
be
cut.
That's
not
how
I
see
it
at
all.
H
I
Yeah
mentor
council
viral-
I
I
think
you're
right,
you
know
I
I
do
support
providing
funding
for
that
portable
housing
trust
fund
and
I
think
you're
correct
that
that
we're
just
one
fund
of
many
that
could
support
this
initiative,
and
so
council
remember,
asked
me
to
sort
of
talk
about
what
this
fund
does
and
and
we're
probably
one
of
the
smaller
ones.
L
I
That
our
department
has
a
public
facing
role,
and
so,
when
you
look
at
it,
these
are
areas
that
just
so
you're
aware
of
that
you're
right.
If
we
don't
have
housing,
you
can't
do
business
expansion,
you
can't
do
business
location,
so
so
it
is
important
to
look
at
the
housing
as
the
horse
and
some
of
these
activities
as
the
cart.
So
so
I
I'm
in
agreement
that
we
do
need
to
look
at
both
of
them
and
and
also
look
at
others.
So.
H
Great
thanks
the
other
thing
that
you
had
mentioned,
but
I
can't
remember
which
slide
it
was.
You
said
these
particular
funding
lease
revenue
sources,
don't
currently
go
to
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund.
I
think
it
was
one
of
them.
I
Yes,
let's
see,
let's
see
I'll,
show
that
to
you
here
we
go.
Can
you
see
the
slide?
Yes?
Okay,
yes,
so
these
are.
These
are
these
are
properties
that
are
the
potential
properties
parcels
for
sale
at
some
point
in
the
future,
not
not,
but
in
the
future
that
potentially
could
provide
some
proceeds
to
the
affordable
housing
trust
line.
It's
just
that
they
don't
point
to
the
economic
development
fund.
H
B
I
Right
right,
so
you
would
yeah
you
what
you'd
want
to
ask
the
different
fund
owners.
You
know
how
they
use
the
fund
proceeds
when
they
come
in,
but
these
are
not.
These
have
not
been
sold,
so
the
money
is
not
there,
but
these
are
funds
that
they
would
point
to
if
they
were
right.
B
I
have
a
couple
questions
if
there
aren't
any
others
from
the
committee-
and
I
don't
know
recognizing
that
most
of
us
don't
weren't
around
in
1998
or
in
2000,
even
though
I
do.
I
have
a
theory,
I'm
wondering
if
anybody
knows
the
history,
so
the
the
two
resolutions,
the
1998-49
and
2000-16-
was
the
1998
one,
the
one
that
put
the
the
one
percent
of
grt
into
this
fund
and
and
I'm
guessing
that
the
the
leasing
of
city
lands
came
from
the
2000-16.
I
I'm
sure
I'm
going
to
ask
andrea
to
answer
that
question.
J
Madam
chair
counselors,
so
I
was
not
able
to
obtain
the
1998
resolution
today
it's
on
microfiche,
so
I
don't
actually
know
the
breakdown.
I
just
know
that
that
was
the
resolution
that
established
the
fund,
but
I
couldn't
track
exactly
where
what
those
that
resolution
and
ordinance
stated.
B
I
I
That
was
1904.
B
Well,
so
later,
okay,
so
my
theory
is
totally
blown
all
right
and
the
angelou
study
is
still
the
economic
development
plan
that
you
referenced.
That
we
are
still
we
still
rely
on,
as
our
plan
is.
That
is
that
true.
I
Yes,
ma'am
chair
that
we
rely
on
most
of
the
programs
or,
if
not
all,
the
programs
have
some
connection
to
all
of
the
different
categories
of
the
angelou
strategic
plan.
I
So
as
I
as
I
showed
in
the
slide,
categorizing
entrepreneurship
and
lita
projects
and
innovation,
et
cetera,
they
all
have
a
connection
to
the
angelou
plan,
and
so
I'm
hoping
to
update
that
for
the
new
century.
B
Right,
I
mean
that's.
That
was
a
big
deal
when
it
happened,
and
I
can
imagine
that
the
council,
at
the
time
my
theory
was
they-
must
have
wanted
to
provide
a
way
of
funding
some
of
the
the
provisions
or
some
of
the
things
that
it
provided
for,
and
so
I
and
I
get
and
it'd
be
interesting
to
know
the
history,
because
I
I
wonder
why
you
know
this
fund
had
had
the
one
percent
from
grt
and
then
it
has
the
the
lease
and
land
sales
like
what
what
historically
led
to
I
mean.
B
I
So
I
was
going
to
ask
if
we
could
very
first
if
we
could
have
miss
alexandra
lad.
She
was
in
the
economic
development
and
has
been
part
of
the
city
for
a
while.
So
she
may
have
some
history
around
that,
because
what
I
wanted
to
say
is
that
the
angelic
plan,
while
it
was
published
in
2004,
it
probably
was
started
in
2002,
so
it
takes
a
while
to
create
a
a
large
plan
because
you
have
market
research,
data
etc.
So
maybe
miss
land
may
have
some
insight
during
her
early
tenure.
B
Yeah,
it
would
just
be
interested
if
you
alexander,
if
you
have
any
context
to
add
to
this.
A
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
thanks,
rich.
So
the
ordinance
numbers
and
riches
presentation
are.
These
are
the
citations
in
the
city
code
to
andrea's
point.
We
didn't
actually
go
as
far
as
pulling
out
from
the
microfiche
which
we
we
could
certainly
do,
but
the
way
I
was
reading
the
the
reference
in
the
code.
A
So
I
could
be
slightly
wrong
about
this,
but
I
think
the
resolution
set
the
fund
up
and
then
the
first
ordinance
in
2000
established
the
grt
revenue
stream
and
it
increased
by
it
started
at
25
and
then
it
increased
by
25
each
year,
so
it
would
have
been
at
the
full
one
percent
in
2004
when
the
angelou
plan
was
was
put
together.
So
rack
racking
my
memory
back
to
2004
it
I
it
was
a
fairly
expeditious
process.
A
So
I
think,
if
I'm
remembering
correctly,
there
are
lots
of
fun
fancy
events
with
free
hors
d'oeuvres,
but
I
believe
it
was
within
a
12-month
period
that
all
of
the
studies
were
done
and
the
plan
was
drafted.
B
And
and
yeah
and
I'd
just
be
curious:
when
did
we
add
the
lease
the
you
know,
so
you
would
think
one
percent
of
our
share
of
grt
would
be
pretty
significant
dollars.
So
why?
What
caused
us
to
add?
In
addition,
the
the
sale
of
of
city-owned
land
and
the
leases,
you
know
what
what
was
I'm
just,
I'm
just
wondering
historically.
I
Yeah
yeah,
I
I
was
going
to
say
I.
I
suspect
that
possibly
the
land
sales
and
lease
was
added
on
because
of
lita
lead
investments.
I
think
that
I
wanted
to
have
a
larger,
oh
andrea
might
have
an
answer
today.
J
B
Okay,
interesting
yeah,
I
just
I
I
mean
I
the
reason
I
bring
this
up
is,
I
think
it's
important,
because
so
in
that
day
the
angelou
report
was
a
big
deal
back
to
the
parties
and
the
free
hors
d'oeuvres
and
now
the
big
thing
that
we're
all
focused
on
is
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund
right.
B
So
it's
just
sort
of
interesting
to
see
as
we
evolve,
how
priorities
change
and
our
focus,
what
we're
dialing
in
on
changes-
and
I
I
just
think
here
we
have
an
example
of
that
and
I'm
curious
rich.
So
if
we
given
what
you've
told
us
tonight,
if,
if
we
were
to
amend
the
bill,
that's
that's
moving
its
way
through
the
process
so
that
it
doesn't
take
from
the
leases
but
only
takes
from
any
sale
of
land.
We
wouldn't
be
hitting
your
budget
the
way
you've
described
tonight.
I
That's
that's
correct
because
we,
I
won't
use
the
word
anticipate,
but
we
are
looking
at
northwest
quadrant
as
a
land
sale
and
it's
a
very
large
proceeds
that
come
from
that.
So
so,
if
we
take
the
lease
income
out,
it
would
not
hit
my
budget,
but
when
the
when
the
land
sale
comes
through
for
northwest
quadrant,
it's
almost
like
a
balloon
payment
that
you
know
currently
3.25
million
dollars
in
appraised
value.
I
That
is
a
very
large
balloon
payment
that
could
happen
over
the
next
three
years
that
could
be
shared
with
with
the
affordable
housing
trust.
So
well,
we'll
be
dripping
in
with
our
leases.
Let's
say
it's
a
hundred
thousand
a
year
for
a
couple
years,
a
balloon
payment
of
three
million
is
a
large.
You
know
accelerated
payment
that
goes
in
without
a
a
affecting
you
know
the
currently,
what
we're
doing
here
in
the
economic
film
department.
B
Yeah-
and
I
I
mean
I
guess
I
had
thought
you
know-
my
original
thought
was:
maybe
50
was
too
high
right-
that
maybe
we
should
move
it
to
10,
but
now
I'm
starting
to
think
that
what
we
should
do
is
take
the
the
lease
revenue
out
of
the
amount,
the
50
amount
that
would
go
to
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund
and
just
focus
on
any
sale
of
land
going
forward,
especially
because
I
think
when
we
were
first
thinking
about
this
too,
we
didn't
realize
the
commitment
that
the
administration
was
making
through
the
budget
process
in
doing
the
budget
adjustment
request,
and
you
know
in
and
and
potential
budgeting
that
we'll
be
looking
at
next
week.
B
So
I
think
we're
in
it.
We
sit
in
a
different
place
but
yeah,
but
we're
still
looking
for
the
funding.
That's
going
to
get
us
that
consistent
level
every
year-
and
this
of
course,
is
not
consistent
as
we've
seen
from
your
slides,
it
buries
you
know
we
haven't
had
we
haven't
had
any
land
sales
in
the
last.
What
was
it
three
years?
B
Yeah,
yeah,
okay
and
then
I
had
one
other
thought.
What
was
it?
Oh?
So
when
you
say
when
you,
when
you
were
talking
about
making
up
the
revenue
from
federal
dollars,
that's
only
possible
this
year
and
because
of
the
stimulus
money
right.
So
it's
not
gonna!
I
Am
I
yeah,
I'm
sure,
you're,
correct
and-
and
it
gets
more
complex
from
there,
because
the
money
that
I
might
extract
from
the
federal
dollars
will
not
go
to
the
small
businesses
that
I
was
setting
aside
for
business
release.
So
you're
correct,
it's
a
one-time,
really
a
one-time
payment
from
the
federal
dollars.
Unless
you
know
the
economy
goes
down
the
tubes
again
and
then
there's
more
money
put
in,
but
it
would
be
one
time,
whereas
the
leases
is
recurring
income,
but
the
federal
government.
B
Yeah,
so
it's
yeah,
I
get
that's
exactly
the
right
word.
I
was
looking
for.
It's
not
recur
this.
That
federal
money
is
not
recurring.
It's
at
this
point
money
that
we
have
because
of
stimulus
money
that
the
feds
have
given
us.
So,
okay,
just
trying
to
think.
If
there
was
you
know
and
and
when
you
when
you
the
the
list
of
contracts
that
you
had
talked
about
the
one,
the
santa
fe
incubator
contract.
B
I
do
remember,
I
think,
to
councilwoman
villarreal's
point
about
how
we
had.
I
think
I
want
to
say
two
years
ago,
three
years
ago
we
did
lower
that
amount
and
there
was
incredible
pushback
about
what
we
were
doing
to
that
funding
and
to
and
to
the
to
that
work,
and
I
think
we
ended
up
restoring
it
back
to
the
same
level
the
following
year,
and
so
you
know
I
that
one
that
one
I
already
know
is
going
to
be
not
well
tolerated.
B
Shall
we
say
so
all
right
anything
else.
You
would
add
anything
else.
Alexandra,
you're,
you're,
raising
your
hand.
A
Yes,
madam
chair,
I
would
also
add
that
the
ordinance
allows
for
the
revenues
from
specific
transit
from
specific
transactions
to
be
directed
at
specific
projects.
So
there's
sort
of
like
this
other
clause
in
the
list
of
where
the
provisions
are
so
that's.
You
know,
that's
also
something
to
keep
in
mind.
A
I
Manager
that
that
happened
with
the
las
estrellas
santa
fe
estates,
piece
in
2019,
the
council,
approved
it
going
out
of
the
fund
and
into
the
general
fund
to
services,
but
also
to
support
midtown
redevelopment.
So
this
lat's
correct
that
it
can
be
changed
at
some
point.
But.
B
Okay,
interesting
andre,
did
you
have
anything
else
to
add
before
we
wrap
up
here,
adam
chair
counselors?
No!
Thank
you.
Okay!
Thank
you.
I
I
really
appreciate
this.
I
think
this
gives
us
a
much
better
understanding
of
the
universe
that
we're
trying
to
tap
into
and
the
impact
that
it
would
have
and
yeah.
Now
we
need
to
figure
out
what
we
can
live
with.
So
I
appreciate
the
presentation
all
right.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
all
right.
B
Sorry,
I
can't
read
the
in
the
amount
of
57
579
for
the
senior
volunteer
programs.
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair
and
sorry
gino,
for
making
you
wait.
I
pulled
this
item
because
I
do
have
to
recuse
myself
from
the
item
as
I
work
for
the
federal
agency
that
this
fund
goes
to
supporting.
So
with
that
I
am
going
to
sign
off
and
if
somebody
wouldn't
mind
alerting
me
when
we
get
to
the
next
agenda
item
sure.
E
B
To
approve
second,
we
have
a
motion
from
counselor
cassette
sanchez,
a
second
from
councilwoman
via
real
and
jennifer.
If
you
could
take
the
role
on
this
item,.
B
B
Yeah
and
if
I
can
just
for
anybody
listening
an
ordinance
amending,
oh
wait:
nope,
that's
the
wrong
one
hold
on
a
resolution
establishing
a
work
plan
for
improving
access
to
affordable
housing
opportunities
for
residents
of
the
city
of
santa
fe.
F
F
The
purpose
of
the
amendment
is
to
begin
this
process
of
developing
our
plans
for
how
to
fund
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund
with
a
governing
body
meeting
what
I
would
consider
kind
of
maybe
a
strategy
session,
and
this
is
where
maybe
I
would
like
some
support
and
input
from
my
governing
body
colleagues,
and
how
to
potentially
strengthen
this,
because
the
intention
behind
this
is
whenever
there
are
strategic
plans
developed.
F
There
usually
is
some
type
of
action
plan,
strategic
brainstorming
session
that
happens
firsthand
and
then
you
go
off.
Do
the
work
which
is
currently
proposed,
and
then
you
go
back
and
report
out
on
regards
to
the
work
that
was
developed.
F
So
the
intention,
as
I
mentioned,
is
to
have
have
the
governing
body
meet
firsthand
to
be
able
to
allow
governing
body
members
to
provide
their
input
in
regards
to
what
topics
we
should
be
looking
at
at
the
committee
level
and
look
at
if
there
needs
to
be
anything.
That
might
be
time
sensitive
in
the
sense.
I
know
that
there's
the
topic
of
establishing
potentially
a
geo
bond,
which
would
be
a
time
sensitive
issue,
because
we
do
have
a
timetable.
We
would
have
to
work
within
to
review
and
approve.
F
Should
that
be
the
route
that
the
governing
body
would
want
to
go
forth
in,
and
so
with
that
that
that
kind
of
sets
the
framework
and
kind
of
parameters
in
regards
to
having
everybody
come
together,
all
the
entire
governing
body
come
together
at
first,
the
entire
governing
body
has
the
opportunity
to
present
their
topics.
F
The
public
is
able
to
hear
what's
being
presented.
The
governing
body
can
understand
what
is
getting
farmed
out
to
what
committee
and
that
way
governing
body
members
can
also
participate
in
committee
meetings.
Should
they
not
be
part
of
that
particular
committee
so
for
to
get
back
to
the
jail
bond
example,
because
I
don't
sit
on
the
finance
committee
and
that
would
probably
sit
within
that
committee
or
maybe
another
committee.
I
would
like
to
understand,
where
it's
being
farmed
out
and
how
we're
going
to
move
forward
with
this.
F
I
think
it's
just
the
most
logical
way
for
us
to
begin
this
process.
We
convene
we
break
up.
We
do
the
research,
we
do
all
the
work,
then
we
go
back,
come
back
together
and
reconvene
and
understand
what
was
talked
about
during
all
these
committee
hearings
and
committee
processes
with
that,
so
I'm
hoping
to
stand
for
any
questions
or
recommendations,
comments,
concerns
in
regards
to
the
proposed
amendment.
H
Counselor
via
rail,
you
have
your
hand
up.
Thank
you,
madam
chair
counselor,
garcia.
I
know
we
were
initially
talking
about
that.
Both
you
and
I
about
a
work
session
so
that
we're
all,
on
the
same
page,
to
get
kind
of
an
idea
of
of
like
short-term
and
long-term
possibilities
and
then
prioritizing
and
and
then
it
would
go
to
committees
that
were
specific
to
those
topic
areas,
and
I
guess-
and
I
I
see
where
you're
going
with
this,
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out.
H
F
Yeah
just
focus
their
what
I
meant
by
that
language
is
the
focus
areas
of
the
focus
of
the
revenue
sources
so,
for
example,
looking
at
a
geo
bond
looking
at
any
other
type
of
tax
revenue
that
could
be
allocated,
because
I
know,
for
example,
now
that
the
cannabis
law
has
passed.
That's
everybody
has
been
in
support
of
providing
revenues
from
those
taxes
towards
affordable
housing.
F
How
is
that
going
to
impact,
and
that's
what
I
mean
by
the
focus
areas
in
regards
to
what
committee
is
going
to
undertake
what
particular
topic-
and
I
guess
maybe
topic
is
a
better
word.
I
mean
I
come
from
a
world
of
strategic
planning,
so
focus
area
is
the
word
that
we
usually
use.
If
topic
is
the
better
word
and
and
it's
more
germaine
to
this
situation,
I'm
open
to
that.
F
F
There
has
been
expressed
in
the
past
that
we
can
recommend
topics
to
the
chairs
to
look
at,
but
I
think
this
is
an
opportunity
for
us
to
come
together
to
really
provide
the
initial
recommendations
firsthand
in
in
a
process
where
we're
all
sitting
at
the
table
and
understanding
whom
is
recommending.
What?
F
Because
there
might
be
an
instance
where,
let's
I'm
going
to
go
back
to
the
geo
bond
example,
because
I
keep
using
that
that
three
or
four
counselors
say
I'm
really
interested
in
that
and
the
rest
of
the
governing
body
says
nope
doesn't
interest
me,
then
those
three
or
four
can
form
their
coalition
to
work
on
that.
It
allows
for
the
governing
body
to
come
together
as
a
whole
figure
out
who
wants
to
work
on
what
participate
in
the
community
process
in
that
open
and
transparent
process.
F
F
Because
I
think
what
we're
running
into
is
a
free-for-all
for
a
lack
of
better
words,
everybody
is
saying:
affordable
housing
is
important
to
me,
so
I
want
to
do
this
or
I
want
to
do
this
and
that
that
to
me
is
it
has
the
opportunity
for
to
leave
out
governing
body
members
from
the
initial
development
process,
because
then
what
happens
is
it
then
gets
introduced?
F
And
you
have
to
work
within
that
framework
of
whatever
is
introduced
at
the
moment
and
to
me
I
think
you
don't
want
to
that's
the
bad
way
to
approach
policy,
because
then
you
have
to
potentially
reshape
it
all
and
if
you
can
move
forward
with
shaping
it
before
it
hits
the
committee
process
to
me,
that's
that's
better
use
of
time,
but
hopefully
that
answered
your
question.
I
think.
H
Yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Councillor,
garcia
councillor
rivera,
you
weren't
in
the
finance
meeting,
but
I
had
brought
up
that.
If
those
of
us
are
not
chairs
on
committees,
then
how
do
some
of
the
things
that
we
want
to
consider
that
may
not
be
expressed
by
the
chair
and
how
do
we
get
that
on
the
table
for
consideration
and
there's
no
there's
been
no
pathway
other
than
oh,
you
could
tell
the
chairs
and-
and
they
would
consider
it,
but
that
doesn't
guarantee
it,
especially
if
they're
not
focused
on
that.
H
I
just
need
to
understand
how
it
all
works
together
and
also
that
we're
not
overextending
staff
with
a
bunch
of
ideas,
but
simultaneously
that
we
also
are
equitably
allowing
for
counselors,
especially
those
not
just
one
say
one
person
wants
something,
but
no
one
else
really
is
aligned
with
them.
That's
a
different
story,
but
if
there's
a
few
people
that
are
interested
in
a
certain
weight
or
option-
and
we
need
to
have
staff
to
support
or
to
have
support
to
re
research
it
that,
if
we're
not
a
chair,
we
don't
get
that
opportunity.
B
Okay,
I
I
do
have
some
thoughts
on
this
and
about
what
what's
sort
of
envisioned
but
we'll
go
to
questions
council
cassette
sanchez.
You
have
your
hand
up.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
council
garcia.
I'm
I'm
going
kind
of
back
and
forth.
I
think,
and
it
might
just
be
because
it's
april
and
I'm
thinking
about
how
many
meetings
we
have
and
how
many
meetings
our
staff
I
mean
alexandra,
are
you
in.
Are
you
in
four
meetings
this
week
too,
you
were
in
finance,
you
so
and
then
I
know
that
we're
hitting
budget
hearings,
so
I
am
wondering
if
there
is
a
I'm
sure,
I'm
trying
to
figure
out.
E
E
How
do
we
do
it
efficiently
and
I,
I
guess
kind
of
one
of
the
things
that
you
said
council
garcia,
is
that
if
three
or
four
people
are
interested
in
the
rest
of
governing
body
isn't
interested
in
it,
then
they
can
kind
of
go.
You
know,
go
start
working
on
it,
but
I
think
for
me
the
purpose
of
this
is
at
this
juncture.
I
am
pretty
much
open
to
most
suggestions
and
I
I
want
the
committee
process
to
really
have
the
opportunity,
so
I
would
be.
E
I
would
be
disappointed
if
some
counselors
kind
of
jump-
the
gun
before
we
all
have,
because
that's
kind
of
what
we're
doing
here
is
we're
trying
to
figure
out
how
we
get
around
our
quorum
issues
and
still
all
work
together.
So
I
think
cancer
so
go.
F
Ahead,
I
I
didn't
mean
that
folks
would
immediately,
if
once
we
hit
this
brainstorming
session
governing
bodies
would
go
work
on
their
own
immediately.
We
would
still
go
through
the
committee
process
once
we
hit
that
findings
process
is
where
folks
can
then
work
collaborate
and
work
together
this,
because
that
would
be
completely
disservice
to
the
process.
F
I
think
that's
what
this
whole
plan
is
trying
to
achieve
is
to
allow
for
everybody
to
participate
in
this
process,
as
we
make
go
through
all
the
way,
through
the
recommendations
as
we
go
through
the
process
to
where
there
is
what
is
now
currently
proposed.
The
the
kind
of
gathering
of
folks
that
would,
in
my
opinion,
should
be
the
second
that
way
we
can
say
okay.
This
is
what
we
come
out
with
now,
who
wants
to
do
what
and
that's
where
folks,
yes,
that
clarifies
that.
E
E
I
fund
that
I
have
a
feeling
that,
as
we
start
to
look
at
things,
it's
going
to
lead
to
other
things,
it's
going
to
lead
to
other
things,
it's
going
to
lead
to
other
things,
and
I
I
would
hate
to
it's
kind
of
like
how
do
we
balance
both
the
focus
of
here's,
the
general
topics
that
we
know
off
the
top
of
our
head
that
we
want
to
look
at.
But
how
do
we
also
not
restrict
ourselves
that
that
organic
process
isn't
happening?
So
I'm?
E
You
know
this
week
and
then
three
weeks
of
budget
hearings
and
then
within
you
know,
30
days
of
this
passing
we're
looking
at
this
hitting
us
the
next
week
of
another
special
governing
body
meeting.
I'm
almost
wondering
if
there's
some
way
that
we
can,
you
know
potentially
gather
information
that
it
might
be
an
item
on
a
governing
body
agenda.
E
So
we
all
have
a
moment
to
comment,
but
I
would
really,
I
think
it
would
behoove
us
to
not
open
up
another
three-hour
meeting
where
we
sit
there
and
discuss
the
merits
of
these
proposals
that
we
haven't
even
researched.
Yet
I
don't
think
it's
a
good
use
of
our
time
and
don't
think
it's
a
good
use
of
our
staff
time,
so
I
think
trying
to
find
that
balance
of
how
exactly
that
same
point.
How
do
we
all
get
to
say
here
are
some
of
the
ideas
that
I
want
to
make
sure
we
cover.
E
How
do
we
make
sure
that
the
public
understands
where
they
might
be
able
to
see
this,
and
that
might
be
something
that
we
need
to
talk
to
our
city
clerk
about
you
know,
community
engagement.
How
is
this
noticed?
How
do
we
get
this
information
out?
Is
this
part
of
our
newsletters
that
we
put
out
and
then
yeah?
E
How
do
we
all
have
that
opportunity
and
I'm
not
sure
that
we
need
another
full
special
governing
body
meeting
for
that
purpose,
but
that
there
is
some
type
of
hybrid
of
having
that
discussion,
making
sure
that
all
council
members
are
heard
making
sure
that
that
information
is
out
there
and
we've
we've
delegated
it
it
out
a
bit
while
also
still
looking
at
where
I
feel
capacity
might
be,
especially
given
the
time
of
year.
E
So
those
are
my
thoughts.
B
B
F
Go
ahead
so
so
I
I
think
counselor
cassette
sentence
mentioned
that
it
would
be
here
soon.
I
I
wouldn't
anticipate
this
meeting
to
take
place
until
may,
because,
as
it
stands,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
this
isn't
scheduled
to
be
heard
until
what
the
end
of
the
month,
the
april
28th
governing
body
meeting,
I'm
not
mistaken.
F
So
then,
if
we
passed
it
that
night,
we
would
have
30
days
within
that
month
and
if
we
pushed
it
out,
as
far
as
may
I
mean
we
can
look
at
open
what
what
works
best
with
everybody's
calendar
in
may-
and
you
know
with
that.
This
is
an
investment
and
I
think
we
we
could
make
the
time.
If
we
really
care
about
this,
we
can.
We
can
make
the
time
for
this.
E
Sorry,
madam
chair,
do
you
mind
if
I
respond
no
go
ahead?
I
I
would
like
to
request
that
there
is
a
moving
back
from
the
implication
that
if
we
disagree
with
your
process,
we
don't
care
about
something.
I
I
think
that
you
can
say
for
yourself.
I
really
care
about
this,
and
so
I
feel
that
this
is
an
important
way
to
do
it,
but
I
really
disagree
with
the
implication
that
if
I
don't
agree
with
this
process,
it
means
I
don't
care
about
this,
so
I
just
want
to
ask
that.
E
Maybe
it
may
not
be
what
you
were
trying
to
say,
but
you
know
I
statements.
Instead
of
we
statements,
maybe
might
be
a
good
thing
to
look
at,
because
I
don't
like
the
implications
that
we
understand
what
what
the
rest
of
our
governing
body
members
are
thinking
and
that's
how
I
perceive
that.
So
thank
you.
B
All
right
we're
gonna
go
move
on
councillor
rivera.
You
have
your
hand
up.
G
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
First,
I
agree
with
what
councilwoman
cassette
sanchez
just
said
and
just
not
to
leave
her
out
there
alone
feel
that
I
I
share
the
same
feelings
that
that
counselor
cassie
sanchez
does
so
just
to
put
that
out
there
counselor
garcia,
I'm
first
trying
to
I'm
looking
at
your
amendments
page
and
just
trying
to
sort
of
piece
it
all
together,
but
your
number
one
is
to
basically
replace
from
that
whole
paragraph
that
really
line
17
starts
at
right
after
santa
fe.
Is
that
correct.
F
Yeah,
and
so
I
worked
with
jesse
on
this,
this
was
his
recommendation-
how
we
move
forward,
because
what
the
intention,
as
I
mentioned,
is
to
begin
the
process
with
meeting
of
the
governing
body
before
anything
gets
referred
to
the
committee,
the
three
standing
committees
and.
G
G
G
So
on
page
3
line
17,
it
says
strike
shall
and
insert
in
lieu
thereof
the
word
two
okay.
F
Yes,
and
maybe
I
can
ask
jesse
for
some
clarification
because
he's
the
individual
that
staff
member
that
helped
me
with
this
amendment.
G
L
B
Yes,
jesse:
can
you
help
us.
L
Yeah,
if
it
counts
for
a
verified
like
I
can
read
sort
of
how
it
would
how
it
would
sound
with
the
amendments
incorporated.
Would
that
be
helpful.
Sure,
okay,.
L
Yeah
so
I'll
start
on
page
3
line
17.
I
apologize
for
the
crying
kids
in
the
background
after
santa
fe,
so
you.
L
That's
true,
so
city
of
santa
fe
shall
hold
a
special
meeting
of
the
governing
body
within
30
days
of
the
adoption
of
this
resolution.
L
At
this
special
meeting,
the
governing
body
shall
develop
focus
areas
for
revenue
sources
that
would
achieve
long-term,
sustainable,
predictable,
equitable
and
consistent
funding
for
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund,
with
the
goals
of
expanding
access
to
housing,
opportunities
for
all
residents,
regardless
of
income
or
type
of
housing
needed.
The
focus
areas
developed
at
the
special
meeting
shall
be
referred
to
the
three
city
council
standing
committees
to
take
on
the
work
of
reviewing
evaluating
and
assessing
a
broad
set
of
proposals
and
recommendations.
G
Got
it
okay,
thank
you
that
makes
that
makes
a
lot
more
sense,
and
and
just
for
a
few
I
don't
know
if
it's
more
work
for
you,
but
just
for
future,
if
we
had
it
all
on
one
document,
with
the
red
lines
or
blue
lines
and
and
who's
making.
What
amendment
that
is
super
helpful
to
me,
but
I
don't
know
if
it
means
more
work
for
you,
but
just
just
a
suggestion.
G
Yeah,
thank
you
so
that
that
clears
that
up.
The
next
thing
I
wanted
to
do
was
just
ask
alexandra:
she's
been
listening
to
everything
that
we've
been
talking
about,
she's,
been
in
the
city
for
many
many
many
years
and
had
to
deal
with
many
governing
bodies.
You've
heard
what
we
all
we've
all
talked
about.
G
A
Madam
chair
council
rivera
thank
you
for
the
question.
I
hadn't
really
thought
about
it.
A
I
think
I
think
we
certainly
need
some
sort
of
process
to
look
at
some
of
the
recommendations
that
have
come
from
our
community
members
through
the
lens
of
both
what's
feasible
at
the
city
and
what
you
know,
what
what
our
our
capabilities
are
and
and
I'm
thinking
specifically
in
terms
of
some
of
the
financial
suggestions.
A
I
I
I
love
the
fact
that
everybody
wants
to
talk
about
affordable
housing.
This
has
not
always
been
the
case,
so
this
is
super
exciting
and
there's
a
lot
of
motivation
and
a
lot
of
interest,
and
I
you
know,
I
definitely
respond
to
counselor
garcia's
desire
to
want
to
have
the
conversation
together
as
a
governing
body.
You
know
I
I
I
know
I
speak
for
many
of
my
fellow
fellow
employees
that
this
has
been
a
rough
12
months
for
all
of
us
and
so
we're.
A
You
know
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
gas
left
in
the
tank
right
now,
as
we
try
to
kind
of
regroup
and
figure
out
what
our
next
steps
are.
So
I
I
think
I
would
just
like
to
make
sure
we're
very,
very
clear
about
what
we
want
the
outcome
of
the
process
to
be
so,
we
don't
spend
a
lot
of
time
kind
of
getting
sidetracked
by
some
of
the
many
complexities
that
are
interesting
and
important
to
talk
about,
but
you
know
if
we
want
it
to
be
a
truly
productive
process.
G
All
right
and
sorry,
what
do
you
sort
of
envision
the
time
frames?
G
B
Counselor
rivera
can
I
answer
that
or
alex
do
you
have
an
answer
for
that?
I
I
think
this.
B
Maybe
I
can
try
and
answer
if
it's
okay,
councillor
rivera
and
then,
if
alex,
wants
to
add
to
it.
I
I
think
the
idea
is.
B
We
because
we
have
funded
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund
for
this
fiscal
year,
and
I'm
told
I
haven't
seen
the
budget,
yet
I
think
we'll
all
be
getting
it.
You
know,
obviously,
sometime
soon,
because
we
start
budget
hearings
on
tuesday
that
there'll
be
money
for
the
fund
next
year,
so
in
in
my
mind,
we
have
just
bought
ourselves
some
time
to
vet
through
the
committee
process,
the
various
ideas
that
have
come
forward.
B
So
I
don't
see
this,
as
you
know,
something
that
we
have
to
do
in
the
next
60
to
90
days
right.
I
think
this
is
going
to
be
kind
of
the
work
that
we're
going
to
be
engaged
in
probably
for
the
rest
of
the
year
and
and
so
and
maybe
longer
for
some
of
these
things,
because
I
think
some
of
the
things
that
have
come
forward
to
us
our
timing,
questions
about
when
they'll
be
ready
to
bring
forward.
B
So
the
the
way
counselor
garcia,
mentioned
time
sensitivity
as
though
we
need
to
hurry
up
in
some
of
these
things.
I
think
there
are
also
questions
about
when
it's.
B
When
will
we
have
the
best
chance
of
success,
and
when
will
we
have
all
the
information
we
need
in
order
to
act
on
some
of
these
things
and
so
like,
for
instance,
the
cannabis?
I
I
don't
know
that
we
know
right
now,
what
kind
of
money
that's
going
to
bring
and,
and
certainly
there
won't
be
any
money
to
bring
for
a
while,
while
the
state
works
out
how
that
policy
gets
implemented,
implemented
and
how
the
revenue
starts
to
be
collected,
so
it
can
be
dispersed.
B
So
anyway,
that's
my
attempt
at
that.
Alexander
did
you
want
to
add
to
that.
A
B
So
and
when
you
say
next,
I
think
what
we're
talking
about
so
next
week
we
start
fy22
budget
hearings
and
so
assume
so
realizing
that
we
have
this
year.
Fy21
taking
care
of
fy22,
hopefully
through
the
budget
process,
taken
care
of
what
we're
going
to
be
trying
to
deal
with
is
how
do
we
bring
that
three
thousand
three
million
dollar
floor
to
fy23?
G
So
either
one
of
you.
So
if
the
the
process
that
I'm
hearing
from
counselor,
garcia
and
others
to
me
sounds
like
a
six-month
eight-month
process,
community
input
getting
together
talking
to
everybody
going
through
the
committee
process,
all
that
it's
going
to
take
some
time,
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
tying
up
funds
or
tying
alexander's
hands
up
with
a
process
that
may
may
take
six
to
eight
months
to
complete.
A
Maybe
madam
chair
counselor
rivera-
I
think
yes,
I
I
do
have
concerns
that.
I
do
have
concerns.
I
think
it's
a
really
valuable
process
and
that
I
think
that's
back
to
my
other
point
that
just
we
have
to
be
super
focused
on
the
outcome
and
we're.
Why
are
we
doing
this?
We're
doing
this
to
secure
funding
for
the
trust
fund?
We're
not
doing
this
to
ask
the
entire
community
to
weigh
in
on
what
they
think
we
should
be
funding
with
the
funds.
B
Thank
you
counselor.
I
just
want
to
weigh
in
a
little
bit
again
about
how
I
envision
what
we're
doing
here-
and
I
think
I
spoke
about
this
a
little
bit
at
the
finance
committee
meeting
about
what
we're
doing
with
this
resolution
is
spelling
out
what
is
essentially
our
committee
process
and
it's
not
a
strategic
plan.
So
I
think
there's
a
difference
here
and
we
don't
really
in
order
to
vet
the
policy
suggestions,
recommendations
that
have
come
to
us
through
various
reports
from
our
community
nonprofits
and
advocates.
B
We
don't
need
this
resolution
in
order
to
do
that.
We
we
are
putting
it
forward
because
we
all
we
want
to
give
the
opportunity,
as
alexander
has
said,
everybody's
interested
in
affordable
housing
that
hasn't
always
been
true
and-
and
this
is
an
opportunity
for
the
for
the
whole
counselor
council
to
say.
Yes,
we
want
to
see
this
work
done
and
we
want,
and
we
are
committed
to
finding
the
revenue
streams
that
will
that
will
provide
a
consistent,
reliable
funding
for
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund.
B
You
know
at
the
at
the
3
million
what
we've
been
calling
now
a
floor,
and
so
for
me
this
is
it's
it's
sort
of
like
we
already.
We
have
with
the
various
reports
that
this
committee
has
heard
presentations
about.
We
have
the
list
of
recommendations,
and
so
I
I
would
say
I
sort
of
like
counselor
cassette
sanchez's
ideas.
What
we
can
do
is-
and
I,
if
I
had
had
time,
I
was
actually
going
to
do
this
for
tonight's
meeting.
B
Is
you
know
we
can
make
a
list
of
all
the
things
that
have
come
to
us
and
we
can-
and
I
had
offered
this
at
the
finance
committee
meeting.
Have
the
chairs
come
together
and
you
know
basically
what
we're
doing
is
referring
these
ideas
to
the
committees
and-
and
I
I
used
at
finance
the
idea
that
the
geo
bond
idea
is
already
being
vetted
by
the
finance
committee
we
tonight
heard
about
the
economic
development
fund.
B
I
think
there's
some
policy
suggestions
that
we
tap
into
utility
funds,
so
I
that
this
committee
would
not
be
the
right
place
to
hear
that
that
needs
to
go
to
public
works
and
public
utilities,
because
the
staff
for
that
committee-
those
are
the
people
who
are
the
experts
about
those
funds
and
about
why
they
have
as
much
money
as
they
do
and
why
you
can
or
can't
use
those
funds
for
why
you
can't
siphon
those
funds
away
and-
and
that's
I
think,
what
we're
going
to
learn
is:
can
you
or
legally,
are
we
constrained
from
pulling
that
money?
B
So
I
think
most
of
these
things
have
a
proper
place
to
go.
We
could,
you
know,
develop
a
list
and
bring
it
to
a
governing
body
meeting
and
set
aside
a
little
bit
of
time
to
say
all
right.
These
these
ideas
are
going
to
be
vetted
by
these
committees,
and
then
that
would
allow
you
know
if,
if
somebody
says
you
know
just
it's
it's
you
could
object.
B
I
guess
you
could
say:
well,
you
know
what
I
want
to
make
sure
that
the
geo
bond
is
heard
over
here
at
quality
of
life
and-
and
I
think
you
know
the
idea
of
having
a
study
session
once
we
have
vetted
by
the
committees.
All
the
different
proposals
that
have
come
to
us
was
so
that
if
you
don't
sit
on
a
particular
committee,
we
can
we'll
come
together
and
we'll
have
had
the
presentations
and
the
right.
B
The
write-up
memos
from
the
committee
work
and
they'll
be
able
to
be
presented
with
us
all
sitting
together,
so
we
can
say
so
we
all
make
sure
we
have
the
same
information
if
you
don't
sit
on
the
committees
and
then
we'll
hopefully
see
a
path
forward
in
in
how
we
do
this,
I
I
think
we
all
particip
nobody's
not
participating.
I
mean
we,
we
all
are
members
of
committees,
we
all.
B
We
are
also
all
not
members
of
committees
like
I
don't
sit
on
public
works
in
public
utilities,
so
you
know-
and
I
am
very
interested
to
know,
what's
going
to
happen
with
what
staff
says
about
those
utility
funds
and
whether
they're
a
viable
source,
whether
a
portion
of
them
can
be
siphoned
for
this.
I'm
very
interested
in
that
conversation.
I
don't
sit
on
that
committee,
but
I
look
forward
to
that
study
session,
where
I
will
hear
the
results
of
of
any
staff
work
done
to
vet.
That
particular
idea.
B
So
again,
I
think
we're
all
going
to
participate,
and
I
am
worried,
though
I
think
there's
a
way
to
do
this
without
adding
another
study
session
and
again,
our
our
committee
process
vets
all
the
time
proposals,
and
so
I
think
you
know
to
the
extent
that
somebody
has
an
idea
that
isn't
part
of
one
of
the
community
suggestions
that
have
been
brought
forward.
B
I
have
said
I'm
perfectly
willing
to
to
hear
those
ideas,
so
I
don't
think
it's
a
question
of
you
know
you.
You
won't
be
taken
seriously
by
a
committee
chair.
I
think
a
committee
chair
well
absolutely
if
you
have
an
idea
as
a
counselor
that
isn't
part
of
the
committee
part
of
the
community
reports
that
we
have
had
I'm
happy
to
add
that
to
the
list
and
if
it's
appropriate
for
this
committee
to
vet,
then
we'll
we'll
add
it
to
the
agenda.
So
I
I
don't,
and
I
and
I
don't.
B
I
think
we
should
look
at
all
of
these
things,
because
they're
they've
all
been
suggested
by
various
groups.
As
being
you
know,
viable
funding
sources,
and
I
think
that's
what
we
now
need
to
confirm.
Just
like
we
did
earlier
tonight
with
the
economic
development
fund.
We
can
tap
into
that.
We
just
have
to
decide
at
what
level
we
want
to
tap
into
it
and
how
we
want
to
do
it
and-
and
that's
you
know,
there's
nothing
constraining
us
there.
B
There
may
be
other
ideas
that
do
constrain
us,
and
so
anyway,
I've
said
my
piece:
what's
what's
the
pleasure
of
the
committee
on
this
or
is
there
more
discussion.
H
F
Sure,
thank
you,
councilwoman
bureau
and
I
do
want
to
apologize
to
to
my
fellow
committee
members.
I
wasn't
trying
to
put
somebody
in
a
predicament.
That's
just
my
passion
on
us
working
towards
a
collaborative
effort
on
this
is
just
I
want
to
ensure
collaboration
is
key.
So
so
I
do
apologize
for
that.
Chair
romero
worth.
I
do
like
your
idea
of
having
a
list
reviewed
at
a
governing
body
meeting,
because
we
could
do
that
at
a
discussion
action
item.
F
I
think
that
intention
that
that
is
the
spirit
of
the
intention
of
this
amendment
is
that
we,
as
a
body,
are
able
to
review
a
body
a
list
and
have
that
kind
of
discussion
on
it.
So
I
I
think
that,
maybe
is
maybe
is
the
best
vehicle.
I
just
want
us
to
be
able
to
have
our
discussions
together,
because
there
has
been
so
many
discussions
in
silos.
F
B
Thank
you
counselor
and
I'm
I'm
gonna
give
the
nexus
of
that
of
the
credit
for
that
idea
to
counselor
cassette
sanchez
councilwoman
vrl.
You
have
your
hand.
H
H
B
Well,
yeah,
and-
and
I
just
I
just
also
want
to
point
out
one
thing,
so
I
don't
think
anybody's
intentionally
leaving
trying
to
leave
anybody
out.
You
know
we
do
have
this
rolling
quorum
problem
right,
so
you
get,
you
can
only
talk
to
four
counselors
and
then
you
can't
talk
to
any.
So
I
I
don't.
I
just
want
to
dispel
this
notion
that
you
know
people
are
trying
to
leave
other
people
out
and
I
think
you
know,
as
things
move
through
the
committee
process.
B
We
all
get
to
weigh
in
and
you
know,
make
our
amendments
and
make
our
points
and
you
know
argue
for
why
we
don't
do
or
don't
like
something.
So
I
I
just
I
don't
think
anybody's
trying
to
create
hard
feelings.
So
and
I'm
sorry,
I
forgot
wait.
Did
you.
You
asked
me
something:
oh
you're,
when
we're
going
to
talk
about
your
amendment,
so
we
don't
have
a
motion
on
the
floor.
I
just
sort
of
let
conversation
happen
with
this
other
one.
B
So
if
we're
done
talking
about
it
and
we
I
do
feel
like,
I
was
trying
to
look
through
what
just
got
sent
with
your
amendment.
So
I
think
you're
going
to
have
to
walk
us
through
it,
because
I
haven't
had
time
to
look
at
it
and
I
don't
think
any
of
us
have
so,
if
the
committee's
ready
to
do
that,
I'm
I'm
fine,
counselor,
cassette
sanchez
does
have
her
hand
up.
So
I
I
do
want
to
yield
to
her
first.
If
she
still
wants
to
talk
about
this.
E
Yes,
I
just
wanted
to
confirm
council
garcia.
You
had
mentioned
that.
You
think
this
goes
to
council,
the
28th,
so
does
that
mean
we
would
have
another
opportunity
to
bring
it
back
with
a
reworked
amendment
before
then.
B
Sure,
yes,
so
I
think
you
know
we
it
probably
well.
B
I
was
thinking
we
could
add
it
to
counselor
via
rael's
amendment
if
there,
but
if
we
pass
her,
if
we
add
well
yeah,
we
can
rework
it
and
it'll
go.
I
I
think
this
is
its
last
committee.
Stop
am
I
right
jesse,
so
it
would
have
to
get
amended
a
governing
body,
but
at
least
we've
talked
about
it
here.
So
that's
good.
E
B
E
And
council,
garcia
I'd
be
more
than
happy
to
work
on
on
that
amendment
with
you
and
and
rework
in
it
to
look
at
the
different
ideas.
So
I'll
chat
with
you
offline
about
that.
That
was
all
and
then
I
counseled
okay.
So
then,
I
think.
H
It
thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
I
just
noticed
what
jesse
sent
is
not
accurate.
I
know
jessie
try
to
put
it
together
so
that
you
all
can
have
it
in
a
readable
form.
What
I
have
in
my
track
changes
is
not
the
same.
The
last
version
that
we
did
together,
including
councilwoman
cassette
sanchez
and
then
also
getting
feedback
from
director
ladd,
is
it's
not
reflected
on
this.
B
So
could
we
just
talk
about
it,
maybe
conceptually
because
I
do
have
there's
a
couple
things
in
here-
that
if
they
are
accurate,
I
do
have
questions
about
so
could
maybe
can
you
rather
than
let's
rather
than
us,
focusing
on
the
language?
Okay,
can
you
just
talk
and-
and
you
did
a
little
bit
at
finance,
but
I
think
your
your
thinking
is
probably
gelled
a
little
bit
more
since
then,.
H
Okay,
so
at
the
beginning,
I
think
some
of
those
adjustments
were
just
statements
to
frame
the,
whereas
more
accurately
like
the
multi-housing
development
applications,
they
were
they
increased
during
or
since
2016..
That's
just
a
language
tweak
tweak.
If
you
keep
going
down.
I
did
add
a
most
recent
down
on
page
two
when
we're
talking
about
the
median
sales
price,
I
adjusted
that
to
what
it
was
at
the
end
of
2020,
which
is
106.
L
Madam
chair
council,
if
I
can
just
say
on
that
note,
I
think
I
think
it
was
560
if
we're
looking
at
county.
H
H
I
just
know
that
we
are
looking
at
2019
and
it
should
show
the
most
current
so
and
then,
if
you
go
further
down
on
page
three,
I
did
add
a,
whereas
that
says,
funding
allocation
recommended
recommendations
from
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund
are
made
by
the
community
development
commission
based
on
hud
funding.
Priorities
and
emerging
community
needs,
with
guidance
by
the
office
of
affordable
housing
staff,
and
that
was
just
to
note
that
that's
a
big
component
to
this
piece
of
the
puzzle
that
wasn't
acknowledged
before.
H
I
believe
councilwoman
cassidson,
just
added
some
language
that
we
had
talked
about
in
finance,
about
where
the
affordable,
housing
trust
fund,
expenditures,
what
they're
restricted
to
support,
and
she
added
language
providing
rental
or
down
payment
assistance
to
eligible
residents.
H
If
you
go
further
down
councilwoman
casa
sanchez,
do
you
want
to
talk
about
that
language
change?
Because
that's
one
that
didn't
show
up
on
the
track
changes?
I
have.
E
It
here
so
it
was
changed
on
now.
Page
three
now
would
be
line
18,
whereas
the
city
endorses
the
property
management
plus
supportive
housing
model
it
had
originally
said
is
implementing,
which
doesn't
doesn't
quite
describe.
What
we're
doing
is
we're
not
on
the
ground.
So
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
were
clear
that
it
is
not
something
that
we
are
directly
providing,
but
rather
something
that
we
are
hoping
to
expand
and
support
within
the
city.
H
Thank
you
and
then,
when
we
go
into
the
on
page
three
well,
maybe
on
page
three.
The
first
now
therefore
be
it
resolved
is
that
it
would
state
that
the
three
city
council
standing
committees
and
the
community
development
commission
shall
take
on
the
work
of
reviewing
evaluating
and
assessing
a
broad
set
of
proposals
and
recommendations.
B
So,
historically,
the
community
development
commission
does
really
important
work
as
you've
identified
in
one
of
the,
whereas
clauses
in
the
beginning,
in
terms
of
directing
where
the
funding
goes
from
the
afford
of
a
portion
of
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund.
B
It
hasn't
historically
played
a
policy
role,
and
so
I'm
curious
about
inserting
it
here
in
that
way,
when
I-
and
I
wonder
also
the
the
I
don't
know,
if
you
have
a
resolution
that
created
you-
that
that
commission-
whether
that's
within
the
scope
of
that
group
and
again
back
to
my
original
point,
which
is
the
idea
behind
this
resolution-
was
that
these
ideas
would
be
vetted
through
our
committee
process,
which
is-
and
I
completely
agree
that
the
resolution
didn't
acknowledge
the
very
important
work
that
you
did
and
so
and
that
you
do,
and
particularly
as
chair
of
that
group,
so
I'm
gl,
I'm
I'm
glad
to
have
that
added
in
and
into
the
you
know,
the
the
bigger
context
of
of
the
work
that
the
city
does
and
the
important
work
of
that
commission.
B
But
I'm
I'm.
I
have
to
say
I'm
I'd,
be
curious
in
your
thoughts,
because
it
that
group
is
not
a
policy
and
and
it's
not
and
it's
sort
of
outside
of
what
was
intended
by
this,
which
is
meant
to
be
our
our
committee
process.
It's
not.
H
A
policy
entity,
it's
a
recommending
body.
The
reason
why
I
added
that
in
is
because
we
do
actually
review
and
make
recommendations
for
review
revenue
sources
or
we
have
in
the
past,
and
we
also
look
at
the
affordable
housing
priorities
list
and
actually
assist
staff
with
reviewing
those.
So
the
reason
why
the
key
word
there
was
reviewing,
so
I
was
trying
to
figure
out
like
how
what
role
the
community
development
commission
shall
play
in
that
process
of
reviewing
and
evaluating
proposals
and
recommendations,
because
we
should.
We
should
hear
those,
because
those
directly
affect
us.
B
Well,
they
don't
directly.
If
I
mean
when
you
say
that
what
do
you
mean
by
that
they
don't
directly,
because
if
we
decide
let's
say
we
decide
to
take
half
of
the
economic
development
fund
and
and
put
it
towards
this,
that
doesn't
affect
you.
I
mean
it
affects
you
in
the
sense
that
now
you
have
more
money
to
spend,
but
it
doesn't,
you
know
we're
not
taking
money
from
you.
H
So
I
don't
well,
I
don't
think
it
affects
us
in
a
detrimental
way.
It's
a
positive
thing
in
that
we
have
more
funding
to
to
potentially
allocate,
which
means
that
we
have.
We
will
need
to
figure
out
how
we're
going
to
to
structure
ourselves
so
that
a
grant
making
process
or
those
grant
recommendation
reviews
that
we
do.
We
may
have
to
do
a
second
round
of
it
in
a
in
the
year,
instead
of
just
one
year,
every
one
time.
B
B
So,
for
instance,
you
know:
we've
we've
talked
about
possibly
the
purchase
of
another
hotel,
and
and
so
that
that
I,
that
I
agree,
but
I
don't
know
why
all
these
individual
funding
pieces
have
to
have
to
be
reviewed
by
you,
because
that's
you
need
to
look
at
the
bigger
picture
of
what
are
we
gonna
do
with
three
million
dollars
a
year
for
the
you
know,
with
the
commitment
that
we're
trying
to
the
objective
that
we're
trying.
H
H
H
But
there
is,
I
think,
an
important
role
that
we
play
not
just
with
the
allocation
but
like
how
I
think,
there's
members
in
the
com,
there's
community
members
on
the
community
development
commission
that
actually
have
expertise
and
an
ability
to
share
what
they
think
also
related
to
revenue
sources
might
be
useful
for
us.
So
I
don't
want
to
disregard
that
this
body
doesn't
have
any
kind
of
important
contributions.
A
B
But
I
think
maybe
it
needs
its
own
counselor
sanchez.
You've
got
your
hand
up.
I
can
tell
you're
dying
to
get
into
this
conversation.
E
No,
I
mean,
I
think
I
think
alexander
just
came
up
with
a
solution
to
the
problem
that
I
was
I
was.
I
was
trying
to
mull
this
over
is
okay.
How
do
we,
how
do
we
gather
the
expertise
of
this
group
and
their
input,
but
at
the
same
time
it's
not
like
they
would
hear
something
and
them
hearing
it
would
negate
it
having
to
come
to
one
of
the
council
standing
committees,
but
then,
if
it
goes
to
both,
then
it's
two
presentations
that
staff
has
to
do
so.
E
H
So
we'll
we'll
skip
that
piece
to
make
it
more
succinct
with
where
they
fit
into
the
process.
There
was.
There
was
language,
that's
further
down
another
further
resolved
that
the
city
manager
is
directed
to
create
a
work
plan
for
staff
support
of
this
process,
so
that
each
committee
is
ensured
of
the
participation
and
contribution
from
subject
matter.
Experts.
B
Yeah-
and
I
guess
I
I
have
to
push
back
here
too-
I
I
really
think
we
we
don't
need
to.
I
don't
think
this
is
as
hard
as
we
think
it
is.
You
know
I
I
think
we
can
again.
We
can
come
up
with
this
list
of
all
the
things
and
we
can
say
all
right.
Quality
of
life
is
going
to
look
at
this
one.
Public
works
and
utilities
going
to
look
at
this.
One
finance
is
going
to
look
with
this
one.
B
Now,
with
what
we've
already
discussed,
we
can
bring
that
list
to
a
governing
body
meeting
and
say
all
right.
These
are
where
these
guys
are
going
to
go.
Anybody
you
know,
have
an
objection.
I
I
don't
know
that
we
need
this
because
I
think
that's
what's
gonna,
and
that
was
you
know.
I
think
what
you
were
talking
about
at
finance.
The
other
night
is
similar
to
what
councilor
garcia
has
been
trying
to
do
with
his
amendment,
and
so
with
the
two
I
I
don't.
H
B
And
I
guess,
and
I
and
I'm
sorry
alex-
I
meant
to
call
you
today,
but
it
got
away
from
me
in
terms
of
because
I
I
I
can
see
where
you
and
I-
and
I
don't
know
that
this
came
from
you,
but
I
but
the
other
night
from
the
finance
committee
meeting.
I
I
do.
B
I
can
imagine
that
this
is
you
all
this
attention
suddenly
on
your
office.
I'm
sure
is
a
little
bit
well
welcome.
You
are
a
one.
Almost
a
one
woman
show,
so
I
I
don't
want
this
to
be
added
work
for
you
again,
I'm
hoping
that
that
the
that
the
staff
that
staffs
the
the
various
committees
will
be
able
to
do
a
lot
of
this
work,
but
I
may
not
have
a
very
good
understanding
of
what
will
be
required
by
your
office
in
order
to
vet
some
of
these
things.
B
So
I
don't
I'm
I'm
open
to
being
educated.
A
Madam
chair,
I
think
the
the
pro
well
I
I
think
what
would
be
super
helpful
is
to
just
have
somebody
who
is
directed
to
coordinate
the
process
and
generally
in
resolutions,
it's
the
city
manager
and
then
she
would
say:
okay,
mary
mccoy.
Your
staff
needs
to
provide
this
information
at
this
meeting
on
this
date.
So
it's
not.
You
know
it's
not
a
super
yeah,
maybe
to
your
point.
A
Maybe
it
makes
it
too
complicated,
but
and
maybe
there's
a
simpler
way
to
say
it,
but
it's,
I
think,
that's
that
helps
because
everybody's
on
the
same
page,
they
know
a
little
bit
to
the
the
way
that
the
presentations
have
been
scheduled
in
front
of
this
committee.
So
this
is
the
topic.
A
B
And
again,
this
is
why
I
think
this
is
the
role
for
the
committee
chairs
right
is
that
that
is,
you
know
what
I
and
I
think
somebody
made
this
point,
the
other
night.
I
think
I
think
it
was
director
brown
I
mean
I
do
have
a
standing
meeting
with
staff
to
plan
out
the
agendas
and
and
and
and
and
we
try
to
you
know,
plan
them
out.
B
You
know
we're
already
working
on
may
and
it's
april,
so
you
know
it's
it
so
that
we
give
staff
plenty
of
time
to
know
that
okay,
we're
going
to
talk
about
geo
bonds
on
you
know
our
may
17th
meeting
I'm
making
things
up
and
so
that
there
and
again,
as
we've
talked
about,
I
think
we're
going
to
be
doing
this
for
a
while,
and
so
I
I
think,
while
it
seems
scary
and
a
lot
of
work
right
now,
we
have
time
and
we
are
going
to
use
the
committee
meetings
for
the
next
for
the
foreseeable
future,
and
I
don't
know
what
that's
going
to
take
for
us
to
get
there.
B
But
I
think
you
know
this
represents
a
lot
of
work
over
a
significant
period
of
time
for
us
to
to
properly
vet
the
different
ideas,
and
I
don't
know
if
that,
if
that
provides
any,
I
don't
know,
comfort
or
you
know,
makes
it
more,
doesn't
seem
so
overwhelming,
or
you
know
I
just
the
way
we
do
the
way
we
we
you
know.
We
know
the
committee
meetings
that
we
have
over
the
course
of
the
year
and
those
are
the
ones
that
we'll
be
using.
H
B
H
I
moved
that
up
that
that
will
be
right
under
when
we're
talking
about
the
three
council
standing
committees,
because
that's
real,
that's
actually
a
little
bit
different
of
the
area
of
focus
for
quality
of
life
committee,
because.
B
Yeah
and-
and
I
understand
why
you
did
that,
and
and
let
me
just
tell
you
why
I
had
it
the
other
way,
which
is
that
the
bulk
of
this
resolution
is
how
do
we
vet
the
ideas
that
have
come
to
us
about
how
we
create
the
revenue
stream
for
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund?
That
is
really
what
most
of
this
resolution
does,
but
then
tacked
on
at
the
end
were
two
ideas.
B
One
was
this
idea
of
you
know
we
have
not
just
been
building
wanting
to
build
housing
or
or
create
housing
across
our
the
housing
spectrum
of
need
that
we
have,
but
we've
also.
We
also
understand
that
at
certain
levels
people
need
these
social
service
support.
B
Behavioral
health
support
other
social
service
help
in
order
to
be
successful
in
that
housing
and
be
successful
in
getting
on
their
feet,
so
that
I
see
is
like
it's
like
an
add-on,
which
is
why
it
was
at
the
end
and
then
the
other
add-on
was
the
questions
that
have
arisen
as
we
talk
about
creating
all
this
housing,
the
the
other
things
that
come
with
housing
that
we
think
about
that
counselor
cass
at
sanchez
has
been
very
articulate
about
and
she,
among
others,
have
have
been
talking
about
how
you
know
have
you
thought
about
these
other
things
that
happen
as
a
result
of
of
of
creating
all
this
housing?
B
And
so
that's
where
the
growth,
the
we
the
the
the
idea
that
we
need
to
get
serious
about
growth
management
plan
and
and
beginning
to
look
at
that
process.
So
for
me
those
two
things
were
add-ons
to
the
bigger
thing
of:
how
do
we
fund
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund?
And
that's
why
I
had
it
at
the
end.
So.
H
I
mean,
I
think,
it's
important
to
state
what
it
what
it
does.
I
was
just
thinking
it
actually
fell
in
line
with
the
standing
committee,
their
goals,
because,
right
after
that,
we're
talking
about
proposals
and
recommendations
considered
for
analysis,
that's
going
to
be
part
of
what
quality
of
life
is
committee
is
going
to
be
looking
at,
so
I
guess
it
it
doesn't.
H
I
put
it
up
at
the
top
only
because
the
other
further
resolved
pieces
actually
apply
to
all
of
them,
so
we'll
just
have
to
look
at
the
order
of
where
maybe
you.
B
Belong
and
I'll,
just
just
let
me
just
read
this
quality
of
life
committee
specifically-
shall
explore
the
benefits
of
and
options.
For
so
I
mean
we
are
in
this
sense.
For
that
particular
thing.
We
are
a
step
back
from
where
we
are
with
with
funding
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund
right.
We
have
specific
proposals
in
front
of
us
to
fund
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund.
What
we're
looking
at
through
this
quality
of
life
direction
committee
direction
is
we've
got
to
figure
out
what
the
options
are.
B
We've
got
to
we've
we're
we're
one
step
back,
we
are
or
more
maybe
you
know,
we've
got
to
figure
out
what
level
of
funding
do
we
currently
have.
You
know
what
what
is
the
universe
of
funding
options?
Look
like
what
you
know.
What
role
does
the
city
have
in
in
any
of
those?
What
things
do
we
control
so
we're?
You
know
we
may
even
want
to
you
know,
as
I
think
about
it.
B
We
may
even
want
some
help
from
outside
groups,
similar
to
how
we've
had
outside
groups
weighing
in
on
how
do
we
fund
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund.
So
in
that
sense,
I
just
don't
want
people
to
get
confused
that
these
are,
that
is
that
is
almost
separate
work,
but
but
very
related
to
funding
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund
and
the
implications
of
having
that
level
of
funding
year
in
and
year
out.
B
H
Okay,
I
think
we'll
just
I'll
just
have
to
look
at
that
as
a
whole
again
reading
through
these
different
sections,
I'm
just
going
to
move
on
yep
the
next
one
that
was
just
changing
the
language.
It
says
be
it
for
the
resolve
that
not
the
individual
recommendations
but
potential
recommendations,
because
they're
not
coming
from
individuals.
H
B
H
Which
one
are
you
seeing?
I
don't
have
any.
B
H
A
strikeout
online:
do
you
have
anything
on
yours?
Okay,
no,
that
shouldn't
be
struck
out,
although
there
was
a
question
about
growth
management
using
that
word,
as
as,
if
growth
was
needed
to
be
managed,
it's
a
term
of
art,
though
people
I
mean,
I
I
hear
you
but
there's
something
alexandra.
That
was
a
term
that
is
also
used,
but
it's
I
we
didn't
make
this
amendment,
I'm
just
trying
to
remember.
A
H
Any
changes
in
that
section,
so
I'm
not
sure
that's
why.
G
H
Have
to
give
you
all
a
cleaner
copy,
and
I
appreciate
that
jesse
tried
to
make
this
work,
but
it's
probably
more
confusing
what
you
all
received.
B
But
okay,
so
just
how
does
this
go
forward?
So
you
so
again,
we've
we've
heard
that
this
goes
to
public
works
and
public
utilities.
I
can't
remember:
do
you
sit
on
that
committee?
No,
no!
None
of
well
councillor
garcia!
You
sit
on
it,
councilor
rivera
chairs
it
there
we
go
so
we
have
two
members,
so
somebody
could
offer
this
amendment
there
on
your
behalf.
If
you
were
to
task
somebody
to
do
that.
G
B
E
Counts
of
calcite
sanchez,
you
have
a
hand
up
yeah.
There
was
one
it's
a
very
tiny
amendment
that
was
missed.
It's
on
page
three
line
10.
It
said
where
city
staff
have
identified
other
potential
sources
of
funds
for
the
aht,
affordable
housing.
Trust
fund
that
require
legislative
actions
is
required.
So
I
took
out
the
second
is
required.
So
just
read,
city
staff
have
identified
other
potential
sources
of
funds
for
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund
that
require
legislative
action.
B
B
All
right,
so
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
to
bring
the
bill
back
after
it
goes
to
public
works
and
public
utilities
before
it
goes
to
the
governing
body,
and
we
will
schedule
it
on
our
april
21st
meeting
and
then
hopefully
the
the
amendments
that
councilor
via
real
has
talked
about
tonight
and-
and
I
think
act,
maybe
even
the
ones
that
counselor
garcia
has
in
the
mix
too.
So
all
right-
I
I
don't
know
counselor
garcia.
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
you.
B
C
M
M
M
B
Yes,
right,
we
are
going
to
item
n
and
counselor
cassette
sanchez.
I
think
you
pulled
this
first
and
then
also
counselor
via
rail.
You
had
pulled
it
and
there
may
be
others
who
want
to
weigh
in
here.
E
Yeah,
I
don't
really
have
questions
at
this
point.
You
know
so
much
of
it
was
covered
in
the
in
the
presentation,
and
I
I
just
think
that
there's
a
little
bit
more
to
think
about
here,
jesse.
What
is
the
schedule
for
this
bill?
I'd
like
to
I'd
like
to
hold
it.
I
think
that
we
need
to
be
reviewing
some
of
these
options
a
little
bit
more
and
potentially
looking
at.
If
we
want
to
amendment
I'm
just
I'm
not
ready
to
make
that
decision
at
this
time
so
jesse.
What
is
the
schedule.
L
Chair
counselors,
after
this,
it's
currently
scheduled
for
the
public
hearing
governing
body
on
the
28th.
So
there
is,
I
believe,
one
more.
G
E
G
E
B
B
Yes,
all
right
with
that,
we
are
now
to
action
items
for
discussion.
We
do
not
have
any
of
those
tonight
matters
from
staff
jennifer
do
you
have
anything
for
us,
then,
for
me
tonight,
madam
chair
all
right
matters
from
the
committee
seeing
none
matters
from
the
chair,
our
next
meeting
wednesday
april
21st.
We
we
know
that.
Thank
you.
Everybody
appreciate
the
conversation.
We'll
see
you
at
our
next
stop
good
night.
We're
adjourned.