►
From YouTube: ARC 1/9/23
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
B
B
B
I'd
like
to
call
to
order
today,
Monday
January,
9th
2023
public
hearing
for
the
city
of
Tampa's,
Architectural
Review
commission,
to
order
I
already
saw
that
welcome
everyone.
I'm
Susan,
klausmith
I,
am
the
chair
of
the
committee
I'm,
also
an
architect.
If
you
are
here
to
present
a
project,
you
will
have
limited
time
to
make
your
presentation,
so
we
suggest
being
thorough
but
concise.
B
When
coming
to
the
microphone,
you
will
need
to
identify
yourself
and
your
relationship
to
the
project.
The
Commissioners
will
not
ask
any
questions
during
your
presentation
and
your
present.
Your
project
should
be
presented
in
the
following
order:
the
site
plan,
the
elevations,
architectural
details
and
wall
sections.
B
The
staff
will
then
present
their
staff
report
and
then
we
will
then
ask
for
public
comment.
Following
your
presentation.
The
Commissioners
will
be
asking
questions
in
the
same
order
as
your
presentation
when
coming
to
the
microphone.
Please
State
and
spell
your
name.
Clearly,
if
you
are
here
to
speak
for
against
project,
your
time
will
be
limited
to
three
minutes.
So
take
some
time
now.
To
summarize
your
comments,
because
those
three
minutes
go
by
very
quickly
following
the
public
comment,
the
applicant
will
have
five
minutes
for
rebuttal
and
then
the
public
hearing
will
be
closed.
B
Please
remember
that
the
arc
can
only
act
on
items
that
are
within
our
specific
jurisdictional
responsibility,
owners
and
or
agents
are
independently
responsible
to
obtain
any
appropriate
permits
and
or
approvals.
Now,
if
you
haven't
already
done
so,
please
do
silence
your
cell
phones
and
I'll.
Ask
my
fellow
Commissioners
to
introduce
themselves
starting
on
my
left.
B
E
Move
that
this
commission
accepts
the
meeting
minutes
for
the
Architectural
Review
commission
public
hearing
for
Monday
December,
20
fifth
of
2022
and
for
Wednesday
December
7th
2022
as
presented.
B
B
B
G
G
G
Cycle
that
would
be
on
January
the
11th
at
5
30
pm
I
have
no
other
announcements,
so
I
will
turn
it
over
to
our
legal
counsel
for
the
conflict
of
interest
and
ex
parte
communication
disclosure
good.
B
G
H
A
G
G
B
B
G
G
See
the
property
situated
on
Branch,
which
faces
to
the
West
with
giddens
as
the
side
street.
G
From
the
aerial
make
out
the
structure,
the
principal
structure
and
the
accessory
structure
in
the
rear
in
the
Seminole
Heights
historic
district
accessory
structures
do
not
have
contributing
status.
They're
all
non-contributing.
G
G
G
I
Good
afternoon,
everyone,
my
name-
is
John
Frost
and
I'm,
the
owner
of
the
property
of
branch
and
I'd
like
to
go
over
the
site
plan
and
the
the
proposed
changes.
Okay,
great
okay.
I
Thank
you.
So
as
a
primary
structure,
with
the
addition
in
the
rear
joining
the
alley.
I
So
here
is
the
elevation,
the
either
the
north
elevation
on
the
top
and
the
South
elevation
I'm.
Sorry,
the
north
elevation
on
the
top
shows
the
revised
carport.
Additionally,
there
was
a
car,
a
carport
there
and
that's
I
I,
run
afoul
of
the
city.
I
took
that
carport
down.
It
was
a
aluminum
carport
and
I
put
this
structure
back,
and
but
it
wasn't
in
compliance.
So
that's
what
I'm
trying
to
do
now.
So
this
shows
a
new
carport
with
the
required
setbacks
from
the
alley
on
the
rear.
It
shows
the
new
deck.
I
Now
there
wasn't
a
deck
there,
though,
so
this
will
be
new,
so
we're
moving
to
the
entrance
of
the
dwelling
from
the
side
to
the
rear,
and
unfortunately
it
shows
that
there
was
a
window
here
and
the
window
is
going
to
be
closed
up
with
siding
to
match
and
I
wasn't
able
to
get
the
revised
drawings
back
in
time
from
the
from
from
the
designer.
But
these
these
new
panels
are
going
to
be
woven
in
so
they
won't
be
just
a
box
like
that.
I
I've
done
this
on
the
primary
structure
as
well.
So
all
the
new
structures
will
be
woven
in
okay
moving
on
so
here's
the
west
elevation
again
it
shows
the
where
the
existing
door
is
and
now
that's
going
to
be
blanked
office,
since
it's
moved
to
the
rear
and
again
that
siding
will
be
woven
in
and
then
the
East
Elevation
not
much
difference
there
to
the
existing
accessory
dwelling
unit
other
than
the
revised
carport
and
then
the
the
new
deck
since
I.
Don't
have
any
really
there's
no
walls
to
speak
of
I.
I
B
I
See
so
yeah
the
one
thing
is,
you
know
there,
there's
no
mechanical
going
in
so
I,
don't
I
know
they
wanted
to
see
the
AC
unit.
So
there's
no
AC
unit
right
now,
that's
going
in
in
the
future.
There
probably
will
be,
but
not
right,
now
again,
I'm
not
doing
any
fencing
at
the
moment.
The
future
I
plan
to
the
infill
of
the
siding
must
be
woven.
That's
what
I
I
addressed
all
the
trim
boards
and
everything
yeah
they're
gonna
actually
already
have
deciding
I've
purchased
the
siding.
I
No
windowsill
changes
the
door
that
I'm
moving
is
in
pretty
rough
shape,
so
I'm
going
to
try
to
Salvage
that
door,
but
if
not
I'll
go
to
somewhere
to
another
salvage
place
and
get
a
a
a
I
think,
it's
I
think
those
are
five
panel
doors
that'll
match
again
no
wall,
sections
yeah
and
as
far
as
the
pallet
you
know
like
I,
said
I,
just
it's
existing
siding
and
that's
it
really.
B
Great
move
on
to
the
staff
report
then
Mr
Fernandez.
G
Thank
you,
Dennis
Hernandez
architecture,
review
and
historic
preservation,
manager.
I
think
the
applicant
did
go
through
most
of
the
comments
that
the
staff
had.
We,
we
just
want
to
have
a
clear
understanding
that
if
siding
is
coming
off
and
new
sightings
going
on
and
that
affects
the
window
trim
or
the
door
trim
that
that
not
be
an
afterthought
and
it'd
be
consistent
with
the
references
to
the
principal
structure.
If
there's
none
existing
on
the
accessory
structure,
the
request
did
generate
based
on
a
violation.
That's
why
there's
an
existing
structure?
G
One
of
the
reasons
in
the
site
plan
that
you
see
the
shift
in
the
carport
portion
of
the
structure
and
off
the
back
for
the
deck
slash
balcony
is
because
the
degree
of
non-conformance
has
now
been
triggered
to
where
it
needs
to
meet
the
the
correct
zoning
setback
of
three
feet.
So
that's
why
it's
being
stepped
in
on
the
new
portions
of
the
structure
that
did
not
trigger
any
kind
of
compliance
with
the
existing
structure,
because
it
is
already
in
place,
has
been
there
for
I.
G
Think,
since
the
Inception
of
of
the
property
we
did
did
have
a
historic
picture
that
I
believe
was
provided
to
you,
but
you
can
see
that
historically,
the
accessory
structure
did
have
a
covered
area
in
front
of
it.
So
normally
without
that
type
of
photographic
evidence,
the
staff
wouldn't
be
in
support
of
adding
a
carport
in
front
of
the
vehicular
doors.
G
But
with
that
being
said,
there
is
photographic
evidence
to
show
that
So,
based
on
that,
the
staff
does
find
the
application
to
be
consistent
with
the
Seminole
Heights
design
guidelines
per
the
plans
dated
December
the
15th
2022,
and
we
are
available
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
Thank
you
thank.
B
B
G
Me
Mr,
chair,
I,
didn't
want
to
just.
There
was
a
letter
that
was
submitted
into
the
record.
You
should
have
that
from
Mr
Dobbs.
It's
not
what
I
would
categorize
as
public
comment,
but
airing
on
the
side
of
a
transparency.
I
wanted
to
place
it
in
your
packets
and
let
you
know
that
the
staff
has
evaluated
these
particular
points
that
the
gentleman
presented,
and
we
do
feel
that
the
case
should
proceed,
as
is.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
You
all
right
we'll
go
ahead
and
move
on
to
Commissioners
asking
questions
beginning
on
my
left.
C
The
I
guess
I
just
had
a
couple
questions.
Why
were
you
planning
on
moving
or
why
did
you
show
you're
moving
the
access,
stair
and
the
door
from
one
side
to
the
back.
I
Well,
I
I
wanted
a
deck
back
there
anyway
off
the
back
of
the
unit,
and
the
stairs
right
now
are
very
rickety,
so
I'd
have
to
replace
them
so
I'm,
just
taking
this
opportunity
to
move
the
stairs
to
the
back
since
I'm
gonna
have
to
replace
them
anyway
and
I.
In
my
opinion,
it
gives
a
a
better
view
of
the
accessory
structure
from
the
back
of
the
main
house
you're,
not
looking
up
into
the
stairs.
It's
just
personal
thing
of
mine,
okay,.
C
And-
and
it
was
mentioned
that
this-
that
that,
if
siding
was
coming
off,
that
you'd
want
to
make
sure
that
the
trim
match
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff,
are
you
removing
the
siding
or
replacing
the
side.
I
I
did
I
missed
described
that
so
when,
when
I
initially
got
this
house,
both
the
main
home
and
the
dwelling
structure
were
covered
in
a
in
aluminum,
so
I
did
get
a
a
an
okay
from
the
Arc
to
remove
the
aluminum,
so
I
removed
the
aluminum
from
the
main
house
and
redid
it
painted
it,
but
the
new
trim
up
and
everything
when
I
moved
aluminum
from
you
know
when
you
moved
aluminum,
there
are
no
corner
boards
or
window
trim
or
anything
anymore,
so
I
had
to
replace.
All
of
that.
I
So
I
did
that
on
the
main
house
and
that's
why
that's
the
situation
I'm
in
now
with
the
dwelling
unit
I've
removed
aluminum,
so
there
are
no
trim,
so
I
have
I've
already
purchased
the
the
siding.
The
wood
siding
from
Rome
Lumber
I
haven't,
purchased
a
trim
yet,
but
I
I
get
it
from
them
from
room
number.
So
I
get
the
exact
same
trim.
That's
on
that
I
that
to
replace
that.
I
D
I
This
shows
up
here
a
good
level.
You
have
a
pen
point
with
you.
I
thinks
no
perfume.
Okay,
so
what's
what's
here
now
is
this
carport
here?
That's
out
here.
It
shows
right
here:
what's
proposed,
is
to
demo
that
carport,
since
it's
not
compliant
setbacks
and
so
forth,
and
construct
this
smaller
one
with
the
with
the
correct
setbacks
and
then
there's
nothing
on
the
back
now
and
that's
where
the
deck
will.
I
D
D
What
is
your
plan
for
what
I
noticed
on
the
existing
structure?
Obviously,
you've
got
a
lot
of
strapping
and
exposed
that
we
can
all
see
in
the
pictures.
What
is
your
plan
with
this
new
structure?
To
I
mean
it's
you're
going
to
have
to
have
it
for
code
reasons,
but
what
is
your
plan
as
far
as
the
details
oriented
to
cover
some
of
that
I'm?
D
Sorry,
I
didn't
quite
get
that
when
you,
when,
when
you
install
that
strapping,
do
you
have
any
will
it
be
exposed
or
will
it
be
covered
with
some
form
of
trim
the
shopping
for
the
carport
for
the
wind
strapping
for
the
carport
yeah?
So
if
you'll
pull
up
the
existing
structure,
pictures
I
don't
know
if
that
was
from
staff.
Just
so.
I
D
D
D
I
Yeah,
that's
that
that
ideally,
is
going
to
be
covered
by
like
I.
Don't
know
if
it's
called
like
a
fascia
board
or
or
some.
I
I
wanted
to
talk
to
to
the
guys
to
you
all
about
that
too,
because
I
would
prefer.
You
know
to
use
a
Hardy,
because
that's
typically
what
rots
and
you
know
what
I'd
be
replacing,
but
if
I
couldn't
it
would
be.
You
know
one
by
this
wood,
okay,
but
I
would
and-
and
these
posts
will
be
boxed
in
as
well.
I
You
know
just
Square
boxing
with
trim
around
the
top
and
so
forth
a
lot
like
it
actually
to
to
match
the
front
porch
on
the
main
structure.
Now.
D
I
J
D
So,
while
you're
looking
the
reason
I'm
asking,
is,
if
it's
less
than
a
312
as
a
builder
I'll
tell
you
that
the
shingles
will
have
a
warranty.
So
that's
why
I'm
asking
what
that
roof
material
will
be
I
see
because
if
you
increase
it,
you're
probably
getting
into
your
windows,
but
if
you
keep
it
flatter,
you'll
have
to
go
with
a
different
material.
D
C
I
Those
are
garage
doors,
initially,
I,
I
I
had
them
removed,
but
they
wanted
them
back
and
it
shows
that
those
existing
garage
doors
are
in
place.
So
those
will
stay
yeah.
F
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
because
that
this
doesn't
happen
well,
it
happens
a
lot
because
there
are
lots
of
contributing
structures,
but
I,
just
kind
of
wanted
to
make
it
clear
for
the
public
that
these
accessory
structures
are
not
contributing.
So
we
don't
have
the
same
kind
of
power
or
even
staffed
is
not
the.
F
F
Neighborhood
and
that
you're
willing
to
weave
the
you
know,
we've
deciding
in
these
things
and
and
then
you've
made
the
adjustments
that
I
was
initially
concerned
about
when
I
saw
that
you're
that
you're
accessory
building
was
originally
right
on
the
property
line,
and
this
is
this
is
just
the
lower
floor
is
storage
and
the
Upper
Floor
is
used.
I
Yeah
the
lower
floor
is,
is
used
as
a
workshop
that
I'm
using
now
in
the
Upper
Floor.
We
have
a
son
with
disabilities
and
that's
why
we
bought
this
house
is
that's
where
he
will
be
residing
enough.
F
Okay,
so,
but
there
are
yours,
you
know
you're
working
on
the
place
right
now
and
it
may
be
good,
even
though
you
have
not
TR
according
to
staff,
you
haven't
triggered
any
any
need
to
upgrade
it,
but
you
might
want
to
look
at
that.
Okay
I
mean
some
of
these
accessory
structures
are
were
really
put
together
without
a
lot
of
care.
I
Yeah
I
would
like
I
would
like
to,
but
my
main
focus
now
is
to
get
my
this
violation
thing,
but
I
want
to
take
another
bite
at
this
and
go
back
and
do
windows
and
right
now
they
have
aluminum
windows
that
are
really
really
bad,
so
you
want
to
replace
them,
but
I'm
just
trying
to
get
prices
first
step
here.
All.
B
You
I
only
have
a
few
questions.
Are
you
intending
on
changing
the
hardware
on
the
door
that
you're
relocating.
I
Of
hardware
I'm
going
to
hope
to
go
down
to
you,
know
like
schillers
and
try
to
find
something
that,
as
close
as
I
can
to
what's
there
and.
I
B
And
then
just
just
as
a
note,
you
had
said
that
you
were
not
putting
any
mechanical
units
in
now,
but
are
there
existing
mechanical
units.
B
I
B
C
I
just
want
to
add
a
couple
things
you
just
mentioned
there
that
that
you
you're
calling
for
recessed
lighting
in
the
ceiling
of
the
carport.
Yes,
that
implies
that
the
carport
has
a
ceiling.
It
will
have.
I
A
ceiling,
what's
that
see
a
flat
beaded
tongue
and
groove
okay,
to
match
the
carp,
the
porch
on
the
front
of
the
main
house,
excellent,
okay,.
H
C
I
That
they
found
this
photo
I,
don't
know
if
it's
a
good
thing
for
me,
but
is.
C
And
slide
it
over,
so
we
could
see
the
garage
or
the
yeah.
The
carport
is
is
that
it
has
exposed
and
cut
rafter
tails
protruding
out
the
front.
It.
I
Does
have
that
it
it
had
those
details
were
there
at
that
time.
The
plan
doesn't
call
for
that.
Have
you
considered
them?
I
I
have
I
I'd
love
to
do
that.
I'm
going
to
be
doing
a
lot
of
this
work
myself,
like
I,
did
on
the
main
house
I.
C
A
H
A
I
This
one
I,
even
though
this
one
I
see
what
you're
saying
that
was
that
actually
was
covered
it
I
know
it
looks
like
a
Pergola,
but
it
did
have
a
cover
over
it.
I
This
was
existing
and
then
they
had
a
that
that
that's
not
showing
it,
and
that
was
basically
just
right
and
then
they
had
a
on
top
of
it.
They
built
like
right
over
all
of
this,
a
aluminum
carport
that
cover
that
was
on
top
of
that
and
then
extended
on
Beyond
it,
and
then,
when
I
took
off
the
aluminum,
this
one
was
just
falling
apart.
You
know
because
it
stayed
wet.
I
B
All
right,
you
have
five
minutes
for
a
rebuttal.
If
there's
anything
you'd
like
to
add
to
your
testimony,
this
is
your
opportunity
to
do
so
or
to
provide
anything
that
we
might
have
questioned.
No.
B
B
Okay,
just
want
to
talk
about
the
the
last
question
line,
a
question
about
the
carport
versus
the
pergola
thing.
I
agree:
it
would
be
so
much
longer
to
have
something
that
looks
more
like
a
Pergola
and
you
certainly
could
do
it
in
a
way
that
you
could
put
like
lexan
or
something
on
it.
So
it
has
transparency,
but
it
also
provides
that
water.
You
know
weatherproof
kind
of
condition
they're
looking
for
so
it's
like.
B
D
D
Yes,
absolutely
you
know
other
than
that.
What
they're
going
from
to
what
they're,
proposing
I
think
we're
I
mean
it's
a
great
idea.
E
I
agree:
it's
false
I
have
to
remember,
too,
that
the
majority
of
what
we're
seeing
here
today
is
minor
intervention
brought
about
by
a
permit
violation,
they're
trying
to
clear
that
debt.
E
You
know
with
the
full
intention
of
sometime
in
the
future
of
a
major
renovation,
is
going
to
be
happening
on
this
on
this
structure,
which
couldn't
which
couldn't
fall,
the
carpet
can
involve
any
one
of
a
number
of
different
elements,
we're
they
move
in
that
direction.
We're
definitely
going
to
see
that
again
and
they
will
have
the
opportunity
to
revisit
a
lot
of
details
and
the
feel
and
the
costing
and
all
the
rest
of
that
sort
of
stuff.
That
would
make
up
a
final
project,
we're
not
in
final
project
stage.
H
B
A
E
I
see
the
point
is
well
I
really
do
and
I'm
wondering
if
they're
really
prepared
to
to
either
address
that
as
a
design
element
with
not
a
whole
lot
of
house
is
determined
at
this
point
in
time
or
are
they
willing
to
work
with
staff
on
the
matter.
B
B
It
already
is
I
mean
with
the
imagery
of
the
existing
non-conforming,
that's
already
impacting
both
the
Aesthetics
of
the
accessory
structure
as
well
as
the
primary
right
and
I
think
we
have
to
be
mindful
of
the
fact
that,
even
if
it's
done
piece
Mill,
this
component
is
going
to
have
an
impact
and
does
have
an
impact
at
this
time,
and
we
can't
we
can't
consider
that
it
may
or
may
not
be
replaced
in
the
future
scope
of
work
right
and
then
also
on
top
of
that
is
the
deck.
A
B
A
C
Yeah
I,
don't
think
the
the
carport
is
is
drawn
particularly
accurately
or
with
any
detail
because
of
the
the
the
it's
just
not
drawn
given
what
the
the
applicant
described
as
the
columns
being
wrapped
to
match
the
columns
in
the
front
of
the
house.
If
you
look
at
the
columns
in
the
front
of
the
house,
they're
rather
nicely
detailed,
wrapped
with
multiple
pieces
and
base
and
capital
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff,
the
exposed,
rafter
Tails
would
change
the
the
detail
of
it
and
I
understand.
C
We
don't
have
that
in
drawing
form,
but
if
we
put
conditions
in
the
in
in
an
approval
to
get
this
person
out
of
the
the
condition
of
being
in
violation
right.
A
C
B
C
C
C
B
B
G
You
just
as
a
point
of
clarification.
The
request
this
evening
is
limited
to
the
accessory
structure
and
does
not
include
any
work
on
the
front
porch
that
may
have
been
carried
over
from
the
previous
review,
but
this
evening
they
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong.
I
B
It
is
more
or
less
public
comments
and
you
certainly
can
bring
up
anything
you
might
have
concerns
over,
but
it
is
not
testimony
in
terms
of
you.
C
Know
right
and
and
I've
I've
read
through
the
email.
It
says
if,
if
the
ground
floor
is
converted
into
living
structure
living
space?
Well,
it's
not
be.
You
know.
If,
if
this
happens,
if
this
happens,
then
that
happens.
So
this
is
proposing
a
whole
bunch
of
what
ifs,
none
of
which
are
actually
happening,
and
all
that
this
petition
is
for
is
for
the
remedy
of
the
porch
and
and
the
addition
of
a
deck
of
the
rear,
put
the
deck
on
the
rear
and
the
addition
of
the
new
front
carport.
C
If
you
want
to
call
it
that
R
being
set
back
to
proper
setbacks
and
now
we're
just
discussing
I,
think
the
details,
yeah.
F
Right
I
think
that
they
have
already
addressed
the
you'll
notice
in
that
in
the
drawings
that
we
received.
There
was
a
difference
between
the
the
survey
and
the
and
the
drawings
and
I
didn't
understand
it
until
it
was
clarified
here,
but
the
whole
carport
and.
B
E
Do
have
I
do
have
an
edition
of
a
one
conditional
item
that.
H
H
C
Yeah
yeah
I
have
column
smash
the
box
out
exposed
rafter
Tails
ceiling.
C
In
Arc
22
179
for
the
address
5209
North
Branch
Avenue,
with
the
following
conditions
that
the
applicant.
B
Sir,
before
we
vote,
do
you
understand
the
conditions
put
forth
tonight?
You
can
come
yes.
I
I,
do
okay,
and
so
so
will
will
I
be
granted
a
a
certificate
appropriateness
which
will
allow
me
to
get
a
building
permit.
Now
it.
G
Good
evening
Commissioners
once
again,
Dennis
Fernandez
architecture
and
historic
preservation
manager.
Moving
on
the
agenda.
The
next
case
is
Arc
22-255
for
the
property
located
at
307,
East,
Amelia
Avenue
in
the
Tampa
Heights,
national
and
local
historic
district.
We
will
begin
once
again
with
a
photo
essay.
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
Since
then,
they
have
amended
their
application,
although
they
did
advertise
under
the
same
advertisement
for
the
variants
it
has
been.
The
reduction
is
now
from
20
feet
to
10
feet,
which
I'll
let
the
agent
review
with
you.
G
So
with
that,
we
would
require
that
the
agent
provide
a
complete
presentation
of
the
revised
site
plan
for
your
consideration
of
the
revised
variants,
and
then
you
will
move
forward
from
that
point
with
a
decision
on
if
the
variance
meets
the
hardship
Criterion
should
be
granted,
the
staff
does
not
give
staff
reports
for
variance.
It
is
in
a
demonstration
of
hardship,
so
the
applicant
and
agent
should
go
through
their
hardship
criteria.
L
All
right,
as
Dennis
mentioned
last
time,
we
were
here,
the
variance
request
was
for
a
17-foot
encroachment
into
the
principal
structure
set
back
because
we're
working
with
a
principal
structure
setback
because
they're
asking
the
property
owners
are
wishing
to
build
a
second
dwelling
unit.
L
This
is
the
property
is
zoned
RM
24.,
so
they
are
allowed
to
build
a
second
unit.
In
fact,
the
RM
24
multi-family
zoning
district
anticipates
there
would
be
a
second
dwelling
unit
on
this
property.
L
Since
that
last
hearing
the
property
owner
took
Property
Owners
took
the
commissioner's
comments
and
questions
to
Heart.
They
met
with
City
staff
to
discuss
moving
the
proposed
dwelling
unit
closer
to
the
principal
structure.
L
L
Now
these
these
trees,
initially,
they
were
trying
to
push
the
structure
back
far
enough
so
that
it
didn't
intrude
on
this
protective
radius
at
all-
and
you
know
the
city,
these
are
a
protected
tree.
There
is
a
mitigation
to
them.
The
city
code
acknowledges
the
value
of
these
trees.
L
Although
the
you
know,
the
city
can't
stop
the
property
owners
from
removing
the
trees,
the
city
code,
and
they
would
have
to
pay
the
mitigation
for
removing
those
trees,
but
the
city
code
is
definitely
acknowledging
the
value
of
these
large
shade
trees
by
requiring
that
mitigation,
so
the
property
owners
are
doing
everything
they
can
to
try
and
protect
these
trees.
These
are
a
natural
defining
characteristic
of
this
property
and
this
neighborhood,
the
pro
the
neighbors,
do
not
want
these
trees
to
be
removed.
L
L
L
So,
as
as
Dennis
said,
the
we
have
amended
our
variance
requests
so
that
we
are
actually
asking
for
a
10-foot
encroachment
into
the
setback,
meaning
that
the
rear
of
the
structure
will
be
10
feet
of
from
the
property
line
and
there's
an
Alleyway
that
runs
back
there
as
you're
aware
I'm,
going
to
turn
the
presentation
over
to
the
Project's
architect,
Ray
Basham.
M
How
do
I
get
to
the
PowerPoint.
M
H
Did
you
did
you
get
sworn
in?
Yes,
okay,
thank
you.
M
Since
the
last
meeting
we
did
some
investigating
it
and
some
looking
around
and
we've
following.
Basically,
we
went
out
and
found.
We
took
like
a
thousand
square
foot
radius
around
the
area
to
look
for
similar
projects
and
to
look
for
other
issues
that
might
come
up.
So
the
we
found
information
and
also
different
structures
that
are
the
same
similar
to
what
we're
trying
to
pursue,
which
is
a
garage
dwelling
type
of
unit,
and
also
look
at
that.
So
we
have
invested
in
within
that
a
thousand
square
feet
radius.
M
M
This
property
is
at
307,
East,
France
Avenue
was
built
in
1902
and
it's
898
square
feet.
M
The
second
one
we
found
was
it's:
it's
2107,
North
Jefferson.
It
was
built
in
1927
and
it
is
12
000
square
feet.
1200
square
feet.
Excuse
me.
M
There
was
a
another
one
at
401,
Ross
Avenue,
which
is
11
or
10
56
square
feet.
It's
also
it's
not.
It
was
out
or
not
within
the
20-foot
setback
and
and
then
the
final
one
is
at
305
East
Ross
Avenue
built
in
1900,
and
it
is.
M
What
was
the
square
footage
on
this?
One
I,
don't
see
us
well
again,.
M
M
So,
in
our
opinion,
these
these
examples
set
kind
of
a
precedence
for
that
area
and
that
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
just
falling
right
into
line
with
what
is
already
there
we
did.
We
did
hit
comments
last
time
about
trying
to
maybe
rearrange
that
which
we
we
did
take
the
heart
and
we
did
went
back
to
the
drawing
board
and
we
did
do
some
more
charettes
to
figure
out
what
we
could
do.
We
tried
turning
it.
M
We
tried
to
tease,
we
tried
different
things,
but
none
of
those
seem
to
really
work
too.
Well,
the
T.
You
know
the
parallel
ones.
You
end
up
with
like
a
bowling
alley
and
the
t's
kind
of
separated
everything.
So
it
was
the
flow
just
didn't
work
very
well
at
all,
so
we
went
back
to
the
rectangle
and
we
figured
if
we
pushed
it
back
and
then,
if
we
could
get
within
those
trees,
but
not
interrupt
the
trees,
that's
what
we
were
trying
to
do.
M
So
that's
how
we
proceeded
and,
as
you
can
see,
from
the
site
plan,
that's
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
so
we're
having
a
10
foot
set
back
and
then
we
don't
interfere
too
badly
with
the
trees
and
we
can
get
that
plus
with
this
opportunity
with
the
10
foot.
It
allows
us
to
put
a
sort
of
a
drive,
so
we
can
not
interfere
with
the
alley
as
we
back
in
and
out.
M
J
Good
morning,
Commissioners
Ricky
pedorica
dark
Moss,
308
East,
7th
Avenue
I've
been
sworn
Tampa
Heights
landscape,
architect,
arborist
I
was
asked
to
after
the
last
hearing
was
asked
to
review
the
case
and
consult
on
the
preservability
of
the
two
Grand
camper
trees
on
site,
which
the
owner
wanted
to
preserve,
and
the
latest
site
plan,
as
depicted
I,
think
reduces
I,
know
reduces
the
amount
of
impacts
to
either
canopy
or
either
camper
Tree
by
reducing
the
rear
setback
for
this
proposed
structure.
J
While
the
city
code
treats
campers
as
an
exception
because
of
their
invasive
status,
that
they
caveat
the
code
caveats
campers
as
being
exempt
where
adjacent
to
environmentally
sensitive
areas,
which
is
not
the
center
of
Tampa
Heights.
J
So
by
being
in
this
location,
it
is
effectively
deemed
a
protected
tree
in
the
code
as
a
protected
tree.
It's
warranted
mitigation
for
trees
per
tree.
J
With
a
recent
code
Amendment
for
campers,
passed
by
Council
in
October
2020
October
last
year,
but
beyond
the
code
as
living
organisms,
they
have
their
own
biological
requirements
of
space
and
by
Shifting
the
building.
J
L
I
enlarge
that's
concluding
this
part
of
the
presentation.
Of
course,
we're
available
for
questions
do.
L
Number
one
being
the
alleged
hardships
practical
difficulties
are
unique
and
singular
with
respect
to
the
property.
Again,
these
trees
I
think
that's
easily
going
to
fall
into
there.
It's
created
by
these
two
grand
camphor
trees,
trees
that
were
not
planted
by
the
property
owners
were
not
one
is
on
the
Eastern
property
line.
The
other
is
on
the
western
property
line
and
they
require
a
20
foot
protective
radius
to
protect
those
camphor
trees.
Number
two,
the
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
does
not
result
from
the
actions
of
the
applicant
and
I.
L
Think
that's
a
big
one
here,
I
think
it's
important
to
realize
that
choosing
not
to
remove
a
defining
historic
natural
character
characteristic
of
this
property
is
not
going
to
fall
into
the
area
of
a
self-imposed
hardship.
They
did
not
plant
these
trees.
They
want
to
keep
them.
The
neighbors
want
them
to
keep
them
choosing
to
not
remove
them
is
not
going
to
be
a
self-imposed
hardship.
L
Number
three,
the
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
does
oops
I'm.
Sorry,
the
variance
of
request,
if
granted,
will
not
substantially
interfere
with
the
or
injure
the
health,
safety
or
welfare
of
others
whose
properties
would
be
affected
by
allowance
of
the
variance,
in
fact,
I
think
the
opposite
is
going
to
happen
here.
You'll
see
that
we
have
the
neighbors
who
very
much
and
when
you'll
have
an
opportunity
to
hear
from
them,
they
feel
very
strongly
about
keeping
these
trees.
L
In
fact,
removing
these
trees
will
be
detrimental
and
prejudicial
to
the
neighbors,
as
well
as
to
the
property
owners,
the
variances
in
harmony
with
and
serves
the
general
intent
purpose
and
of
this
chapter
in
the
adopted
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
We've
shown
that
what
the
property
owners
are
trying
to
do
by
placing
the
the
structure.
L
It
is
not
unique,
allowing
the
variance
will
result
in
substantial
Justice
being
done,
considering
both
the
public
health
benefits
again:
substantial
Justice,
The
Neighbors,
the
property
owners
and
realistically,
the
city
wants
to
keep
these
trees
wants
to
keep
that
canopy
and
the
variants
if
granted,
will
allow
development.
That
is
consistent
with
the
design
standards
compatible
with
the
historic
pattern
and
development
of
the
historic
district.
We've
talked
about
that
this
this
unit,
or
this
proposed
dwelling
unit,
it's
in
an
RM
24
District
expected
to
have
this
second
dwelling
unit.
L
G
B
N
You,
my
name,
is
Jim
Lewis
I
live
at
the
adjacent
property
on
the
East
311
East
of
moyo,
my
wife
and
I,
and
we've
been
you
know,
supporting
keeping
the
trees
just
because
it's
they're
grand
old
trees.
They
provide
shade
for
our
yard,
Daniel's
yard
and
the
next
yard
over
they're,
really
impressive.
And
so
you
know,
I
almost
suspect
that
if
we
said
okay,
you've
got
to
take
the
trees
down
we're
going
to
do
the
20-foot
setback.
It's
really
not
in
keeping
with
the
feel
of
the
neighborhood.
N
You
know
you
walk
down
that
alley
and
there's
structures,
there's
Pence
right
up
at
the
at
the
edges,
and
you
look
at
my
next
door,
neighbor's
house.
On
the
other
side,
it's
built
1907
I,
think
the
setback
may
be
three
feet,
and
that's
only
because
we
had
to
get
in
there
to
build
the
house
and
when
they
repainted
it
last
year
they
had
to
ask
to
come
over
and
put
the
ladders
in
our
yard
because
they
didn't
have
enough
pitch
to
actually
go
up
and
paint
it.
N
K
Patricia
was
his
wife
and
we
fully
support
the
trees
and
the
design
of
the
structure
and
the
consistency
with
what
you
see
in
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood
after
we
left
the
last
hearing
when
we
walked
back
home
through
the
neighborhood
I,
just
noticed
how
many
were
right
up
at
the
property
lines
in
the
alleys
throughout
the
neighborhood
and
I
was
quite
confused
about
the
outcome
of
the
last
hearing,
based
on
what
I
saw
when
I
walked
back,
but
we
fully
support
it.
We,
like
the
shade
of
the
trees
and
having
the
building
back.
O
Rona
Thomas
305
Amelia
I'm
on
the
west
side
and
again
I'm
in
full
support
of
the
trees,
hoping
that
you
guys
would
go
ahead
and
approve
the
plans
with
us
having
the
trees
there.
For
me,
it's
a
great
shade:
I
have
planted
a
lot
of
stuff
alongside
the
fence
and
they
have
grown
tremendously
because
of
the
shade
and
I'm,
really
hoping
that
the
trees
would
stay
so
to
keep
providing
shade,
and
hopefully
I
can
have
my
lemongrass
my
bananas
and
papayas
next
season.
Thank
you.
B
F
What
is
What
is
the
characteristic
root
man
of
a
camphor.
Does
it
extend
to
the
the
full
extent
of
the
canopy
above
yeah.
P
With
natural
resources,
are
we
talking
about
the
roots?
Is
that.
C
F
P
So
the
roots
on
campers
are
pretty
extensive,
like
the
diagram
here
that
Ricky's,
showing
with
the
the
encroachment
of
five
foot,
that's
pretty
standardly
allowed,
especially
with
campers
their
Roots
will
respond.
Fine
they'll,
probably
grow
back
just
as
quick
after
the
New,
Foundations
and
stuff
are
in,
and
you
don't
really
see
them
be
impacted
by
a
root
pruning
of
that
amount.
So
you
shouldn't
see
any
growth
changes.
Anything
like
that.
So.
P
D
P
If
they
say
they
would
get
even
four
trees,
this
lot
to
have
four
trees.
Put
back
in
would
be
not
responsible
planting
techniques.
You
may
get
one
back
on
site.
The
rest
would
get
into
paid
into
the
fund.
P
B
Do
we
have
anybody
here
from
transportation?
They
had
any
comments
at
all.
Q
L
Yeah
obviously
Mr
Marsh
is
not
here.
I
did
email,
Mr
Marsh
to
let
him
know
about
the
change
and
moving
it
forward
and
he
did
reply
in
an
email
that
Transportation
had
no
comment.
Okay,.
B
All
right,
I
do
have
a
question.
Follow
a
question
to
your
architect.
Mr
Basham
I
believe
it
was
correct.
G
B
So
you
had
a
really
nice
I,
like
the
graphic
and
the
revisiting
of
existing
conditions
within
the
neighborhood
were
all
of
those
subject.
Properties
I
believe
it
was
seven,
were
they
all
within
the
district?
Yes,.
M
B
B
It
appeared
to
me
that
a
few
of
them
did
not
so
just
comparing
Apples
to
Apples
I
just
want
to
be
sure
about
that.
If.
B
That's
that's
all
I
have
for
questions
for
that.
Yeah,
Mr,
Basham,
I'm,
sorry,
you
can
set
unless.
B
Ricky
but
I
know
what,
when
you
were
talking
about
the
tree
and
the
pruning
of
the
tree,
what
is
the
life
expectancy
of
the
campers
today.
J
There's
some
I
have
on
the
ready.
A
camper
is
not
one
of
them.
B
B
Longer
than
five
years
and
then
what
is
the
danger
of
the
roots
growing
into
the
structure?
The
new
structure.
J
With
the
footer
they're
probably
going
to
have,
and
the
availability
of
other
areas
to
root
for
the
roots,
to
extend
to
it's,
not
a
constrained
situation
right
and
there
isn't
going
to
be
utilities
on
that
specific
Side
based
on
the
latest
design.
So
there
won't
be
moisture
to
go
towards
or
air.
In
that
case,
it's
not
going
to
be
as
desirable
to
root
into
as
the
unaltered
areas
that
there
is
still
a
lot
of
okay.
B
B
Right,
so
you
do
have
some
time
for
rebuttal
if
you'd
like
to
come
forward
and
make
any
further
comments
or
about
anything
that
might
have
been
questioned
or
said.
L
I
just
want
to
you
know
again,
Ask
the
ask
the
commission
to
please
Grant
this
variance,
it's
a
very
good
project
for
this
neighborhood
and
for
the
city.
Overall,
you
even
heard
from
the
city's
arborist.
He
felt
that
the
best
option
was
to
keep
these
trees
these
mature
trees,
rather
than
trying
to
replant
or
anything
else,
the
hardship
criteria
is
there
and
again,
you
know
the
the
neighbors
are
supportive
on.
L
You
know
the
two,
especially
the
neighbors,
that
are
immediately
impacted,
so
we
will
just
ask
that
you
grant
this
variants,
so
we
can
move
this
project
forward.
B
E
D
And
as
staff,
even
you
know,
the
arbor
said
sounds
like
the
neighborhood's
for
the
trees,
and
even
you
know
he
he
mentioned
that
you
he
would
rather
see
the
tree
stay
than
replanted
or
paid
into
the
fund,
which
I
would
say
the
neighborhood.
Is
you
know
in
line
with
that
adult
process,
but
typically
as
a
board,
we
have
to
look
at
the
hardships.
D
E
I
remember
this
project
when
it
first
came
before
this
commission
and
to
my
fellow
Commissioners,
there's
really
no
surprise
on
my
part
that
I'm
really
not
a
big
fan
of
granting
variances
from
where
we
are
today
with
this
proposal
and
where
it
was
I,
do
believe
that
the
owner
and
his
team
have
come
together
and
and
push
this
to
the
Limit,
where
they
both
have
their
accessory
dwelling
and
the
trees
for
this
site.
E
C
F
E
C
Want
to
have
everybody
that
needs
that
wants
to
do
this
have
to
come
in
for
an
exemption
to
the
to
the
setbacks,
because
you
almost
almost
every
project,
would
have
to
you
know
to
build
an
accessory
structure
of
any
size
and
not
having
it.
You
know
encroach
upon
the
the
main
front.
Primary
structure.
You'd
almost
have
to
always
come
for
an
exception,
so
it
I
think
the
zoning
setback
is
is
a
difficulty
that
is
not
as
well
thought
out
as
it
could
be.
You.
E
Know
in
terms
of
these
huge
trees,
you
know
this
is
not
an
unusual
pattern.
You
know
you
can
go
all
throughout
the
city
of
Tampa,
the
older
neighborhoods,
even
on
the
small
lots,
and
you
see
the
same
thing
over
and
over
again,
one
tree
after
another
planted
right
there
on
the
property
line
right
straddling
two
properties,
rendering
individual
pieces
of
property
almost
unbuildable.
Even
if
you
wanted
to
replace
a
structure
and
I'm
just
talking
about
anywhere
in
the
city,
never
mind
a
historic
district.
B
And
I
do
I.
Do
think
that
since
the
last
time
they
were
before
us,
they
actually
made
the
access
to
the
dwelling
from
the
rear,
vehicular
access
safer
for
the
neighborhood,
and
you
know
in
my
neighborhood
we
still
have
active
alleys
and
we're
seeing
more
and
more
access
through
the
alleys
for
vehicles
and
it's
it's
starting
to
cause
some
issues
so
having
just
that
little
bit
more
space
to
allow.
B
Before
you
enter,
the
alley
is
certainly
something
that
I
commend
and
you
know
I
the
tree
thing.
Yes
same
thing,
you
know
my
property,
so
I
I
get
the
whole
meeting
to
work
with
the
land
and
what
it
tells
you
you
can
and
cannot
do
and
in
in
terms
of
the
canopy.
B
Q
B
D
You
don't
have
that
in
other
areas.
So
again,
having
seen
before
to
now,
you
know
get
my
previous
comments.
I
mean
I,
do
kind
of
stated
where
I
feel
like
we
are,
but
with
that
said,
it
has
come
a
long
way
and
you
know
sounds
like
transportation
is
good
with
the
layout.
F
I
move
that
the
that
the
variance
request
for
case
Arc
22-255
for
property,
located
at
307,
East,
Amelia
Avenue
in
the
Tampa
Heights
historic
district
to
be
granted
as
depicted
on
the
site
plan
presented
at
the
public
hearing
for
a
a
10-foot
variance
in
the
rear
yard
setback,
with
an
encroachment
of
two
feet
for
Eaves
and
gutters.
Based
upon
the
petitioner
meeting
the
burden
of
proof.
With
regard
to
the
six
hardship
criteria
set
forth
in
section
27-114,
D
of
the
city
of
Tampa
code
of
ordinances
for
granting
variances.
H
Appropriate
I
would
ask
that
you
Mr
Myers.
If
you
read.
F
Exactly
that,
okay,
that
the
rear
yard
set
that
the
okay
for
a
rear
yard
setback
from
10
feet
from
20
feet
to
10
feet
with
an
encroachment
of
two
feet.
Four
Eaves
and
gutters.
E
G
L
A
M
This
project
is
a
garage
storage,
dwelling
type
of
unit,
a
secondary
unit
on
the
rear
of
the
property.
The
ground
level
will
consist
of
some
garage,
obviously,
and
some
storage
and
a
full
bathroom
for
the
tenant
to
use
maintenance
for
maintenance
like
when
they're
doing
the
yard
work.
M
We've
been
through
the
site
plan,
but
the
site
plan
here
is
the:
has
the
tent
shows
the
10-foot
set
back
and
the
it's
a
rectangle.
The
stairs
are
beat
on
the.
M
The
stairs
is
going
to
be
on
the
towards
the
house
side,
so
it
won't
be
viewed
from
the
garage
or
from
the
alley.
M
Okay,
first
floor,
a
plan:
you
can
see
that
the
the
garage
is
on
the
right
hand,
side
storage
will
be
on
the
left
hand,
side
and
then
it's
at
the
stairs
on
that
there'd
be
access
from
the
house
side
through
another
garage
or
through
a
double
door
to
get
into
the
garage
and
the
storage
unit.
M
The
second
floor
is
a
two
bedroom
dwelling
with
a
washer
and
dryer
stacked
in
the
in
the
center
of
as
first
as
you
come
in
right
there
next
to
the
door
and
the
kitchen
is
on
the
right
hand,
side
and
then
the
bathroom
is
stacked
above
the
bathroom.
On
the
first
floor,.
M
The
exterior
will
be
consistent
with
the
historical
area
and
to
match
the
existing
structure,
so
it'll
be
a
wood,
siding
wood
trim,
asphalt,
shingles.
M
G
The
fencing,
as
you
see
in
the
rendering
is,
is
a
has
a
certain
type
of
placement.
I'm,
not
sure.
If
Transportation
has
reviewed
that
placement
I,
don't
believe
that
particular
placement
is
going
to
be
acceptable,
but
the
material
and
the
location
of
the
fence
I
think
we're
going
to
need
to
look
at
in
more
depth.
The
overhang
is
16
inches
I
believe,
is
what
was
called
out.
That's
a
fairly
minimal
overhang
for
the
scale
of
this
particular
structure.
I
would
encourage
a
deeper
overhang,
perhaps
24
inches
the
trim
detail.
G
As
you
can
see
in
the
renderings,
the
trim
is
somewhat
of
a
picture
frame.
It
doesn't
have
a
sill
identified
more
of
a
contemporary
framing
approach,
so
we
would
want
to
get
some
clarity
on
that
I
couldn't
make
out
in.
In
the
actual
line
drawings,
if
that
was
the
same
detail
or
not
Window
and
Door
selections,
something
that
obviously
is
going
to
have
to
be
provided.
B
D
D
A
M
Be
outside
of
the
alleys
okay,
and
as
far
as
screening
I'm
we're
going
to
do.
Landscaping.
Q
It's
a
little
bit
of
open
to
answer:
I'm
I'm,
Daniel,
perdom
I'm,
the
homeowner,
along
with
my
wife
I've,
been
sworn
in.
Okay,
really
open
to
maybe
something
similar
to
what
we
also
have
in
the
front
of
the
house,
which
is
more
of
a
open,
picket
fence.
Q
We
are
concerned
a
little
bit
about
maybe
safety
and
trespassing
from
the
rear
alley.
D
Q
D
H
Q
Perhaps
reasonable
setback
clearance
from
the
is
it
a
driveway
driveway
aprons
just
returning
back
to
the
house,
so
there's
a
clearance
from
the
driveway
of
you
know
three
to
four
feet
of
some
sort.
Perhaps
so
just
property
line
tied
to
the
property
line,
then
just
return
back
to
the
building.
Maybe
here
it
may
look
a
little
bit
different.
We
go
a
little
wider
and
then
just
close
back
yeah
we're.
M
Q
D
D
M
D
Q
Q
Q
Start
with
the
lighting,
this
is
some
of
the
lighting
we
we
liked-
and
we
have
seen,
is
as
close
to
as
original
as
some
of
the
historic
stuff
we've
seen.
D
What
are
you
planning
to
use
for
your
soffit
if
you
use
five
or
cement?
What
what
type
of
look?
If
they're
we
looked
at?
What
are
you
thinking
smooth?
Are
you
thinking
a
beadboard
look
or
many
other
options,
but
if
you're
going
to
widen
this
soffit
at
24
inches,
obviously
it's
now
it's
going
to
be
something
that
you
you,
it's
more
predominant
you're
going
to
see
it.
Q
Yeah,
when
you
step
into
our
porch,
is
actually
open
with
the
rafters
and
then
it
does
have
the
bead
board
in
between
the
rafters
I,
particularly
like
to
maybe
stay
with
that.
Look
where
we
can
Ray
agree
with
with
me
and
yeah.
D
Q
Those
would
be
in
interior
elements,
I
I,
don't
know
that
I
have
picked
that
out
yet,
but
that's
their
runs.
You
know
inside
the.
J
D
F
F
You
have
that
you
have
the
stair
coming
up
from
below.
It
seems
like
there's
the
potential
for
perhaps
for
a
closet
over
that
over
the
stairway
over
the
underneath.
C
F
E
I'd
like
to
follow,
through
with
a
related
item
to
that
stair,
you
have
a
number
of
entrance
points
into
this
building
into
the
stair
going
up.
We
have
the
double
doors
going
into
the
garage.
You
have
the
garage
doors
and
they
all
have
a
relationship
to
the
ground
right
now,
it's
dirt.
E
Q
Know
we
we
I,
don't
know
where
that
we've
we've
talked
it
over
with
with
Ricky
who
was
just
here
earlier
landscape.
He
we're
in
the
process
of
developing
that
I.
Actually
like
the
idea
of
like
more
of
gravel.
This
is
a
little
bit
soft.
It
allows
a
lot
of
water
to
permeate,
but
yeah.
It's
it's
still
in
process.
B
A
B
D
D
Q
Of
yeah,
so
at
least
our
goal
is
that
it
it
Dimensions
the
same
thing
as
the
primary
as
the
primary
structure,
and
that
is
exactly
six
inches.
Okay,.
Q
B
A
Q
E
E
Now,
if
I
recall
correctly
from
your
drawings,
you
had
intended
to
have
some
sort
of
a
fuel,
a
flat
soffit
panel.
Q
D
M
B
G
You
go
ahead
and
yes,
detail
just
with
a
discussion
on
the
siding.
I
just
want
to
reinforce
that
smooth
Hardy
is
the
preferred.
Siding.
I
saw
some
detail
about
Cedar
the
faux
Cedar
look
so
just
want
to
make
sure
we
understand
that.
D
D
B
D
E
A
C
D
B
C
C
F
No
I'm
not
here
but
not
on
this
one
but
I'm
sure
that
I
will
get
assistance
and.
B
F
E
A
With
the
following
with
the
following
conditions,.
F
That
the
applicant
shall
provide
additional
information
to
staff
for
the
overhang
overhang
detailing
and
the
and
increase
the
overhang
to
24
inches.
F
That
this
new
construction
maintains
the
proportions
of
the
proportions
of
buildings
within
the
district
it
set
back.
His
is
consistent
with
other
historic
examples.
A
B
Do
okay,
thank
you,
okay
and
then
those
who
I
forget
what
I
had
to
say.
I.