►
From YouTube: ARC 11-3-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
B
C
C
D
D
If
you
are
here
to
present
a
project,
you
will
have
limited
time
to
make
your
presentation,
so
we
suggest
being
thorough
but
concise.
When
coming
to
the
microphone,
you
will
need
to
identify
yourself
and
your
relationship
to
the
project.
The
commissioners
will
not
ask
any
questions
during
your
presentation.
D
D
Following
your
presentation
and
the
public
comment
period,
the
commissioners
will
begin
asking
questions
in
the
same
orders
as
your
presentation,
please
state
and
spell
your
name
clearly.
If
you
are
here
to
speak
for
or
against
a
project,
your
time
will
be
limited
to
three
minutes
so
take
that
time
take
some
time
now.
To
summarize
your
comments,
because
three
minutes
goes
by
very
quickly
following
public
comments,
the
applicant
will
have
five
minutes
for
rebuttal.
D
D
C
C
H
Good
evening,
commissioners
dennis
fernandez,
architects,
review
and
historic
preservation
manager.
We
have
no
continuations
for
you
to
act
upon
this
evening,
so
we
can
move
on
to
the
swear
in
so
anyone
in
the
audience
is
going
to
be
providing
testimony
or
wishes
to
participate
in
public
comment.
Please
stand
and
raise
your
right
hand
for
the
swearing-in.
I
Good
evening,
commissioners
ron
williams
staff
with
historic
preservation.
The
first
two
cases
reflected
on
tonight's
agenda
are
connected,
so
we're
going
to
open
those
together.
So
the
first
one,
that's
on
the
agenda
is
arc.
21-442,
slash,
rez
21-86.
This
is
for
the
address
or
there's
multiple
addresses,
1701
north
florida
avenue.
22
excuse
me:
202,
east
7th
avenue,
1802
to
1808
north
morgan
street
and
209
east
oak
avenue
associated
with
that
parcel
in
question.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This
is
the
only
contributing
structure.
That's
located,
as
I
alluded
to
in
the
introduction,
and
just
to
give
you
a
little
history
that
this
is
going
to
be
relocated
over
here
is
the
request.
So
it's
jumping
morgan
to
the
east.
I
This
is
our
vicinity
map
the
boundaries
of
the
local
district
are
indicated
in
the
red
you
see
on
the
bottom.
This
is
on
the
south
southwest
quadrant
of
the
vicinity
map,
which
is
indicated
here.
I
This
is
an
ariel
this.
This
red
dot
is
the
perspective
that
I'm
going
to
show
you
and
I'm
going
to
walk
you
around
the
whole
parcel,
showing
you
kind
of
the
different
shots
as
you
look
into
the
property
in
question,
so
we're
standing
here
on
florida
avenue.
I
There's
a
marker
here
that
says
tampa
heights,
that's
not
historic
about
2000
is
this
request
came
to
our
board
and
we
approved
it
at
this
location.
I
I
I
I
I
To
conclude,
just
a
couple
shots
looking
down
florida
avenue
wanted
to
show
the
pitch
of
florida
avenue,
there's
a
fall
as
you
go
to
the
north.
It
increases
and
then,
as
you
look
to
the
south,
there's
the
fall.
So
that
concludes
the
photo
presentation
at
this
time.
We'll
have
the
agent
address
the
board.
J
J
I
want
to
thank
ron
for
that
presentation,
we're
again
here
for
a
recommendation
on
a
pd
rezoning
and
for
a
right-of-way
vacation,
there's
actually
two
agenda
items.
So
while
we
have
a
total
of
60
minutes
for
our
presentation
out
of
respect
for
for
your
time
and
our
fellow
travelers
on
this
evening's
agenda,
we're
going
to
try
to
stay
well
well
below
that
60-minute
allotment,
I'd
like
to
first
introduce
the
project
team
who's
here
with
us
this
evening.
J
This
project's
a
joint
development
of
mayfly
development
and
logi
capital,
matt
durbin
with
mayflies
here,
as
well
as
pat
and
chalero
with
loci
capital.
Our
project
civil
engineer
is
kimberly.
Horn.
Scott
gilner
is
here
and
we'll
be
able
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have.
Our
arborist
is
dark,
moss
and
ricky
patrick,
is
here
this
evening
and
on
the
architecture
front,
this
product's
been
a
collaboration
of
saul,
fleischman,
fleischman,
garcia,
he's
the
consulting
design
architect
as
well
as
humphreys
and
partners.
J
So
again,
we
are
not
here
for
any
design
approvals.
This
is
not
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
hearing.
We
will
come
back
and
hopefully
early
2022
after
city
council
approval
of
the
pd
in
right-of-way
vacating.
So
we
we
are
just
here
to
seek
your
approval
in
anticipation
of
a
december
9th
city
council
hearing
for
that
pd
rezoning
in
right-of-way
vacating.
J
So
ron
summed
this
up
real
nicely.
This
is
a
full
city
block.
This
project
comprises
a
full
city
block,
it's
obviously
within
it's
fully
within
the
tampa
heights:
historic
district.
It's
also
in
the
tampa
heights
urban
village
in
the
cbd,
periphery
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
It's
just
under
two
and
a
half
acres,
there's
two
things
that
bear
mentioning
about
what
some
lots
that
are
within
this
site.
The
first
is
that,
as
ron
alluded
to,
there
is
a
proposed
relocation.
That's
going
to
be
before
you
as
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
to
relocate
a
contributing
structure.
J
The
plan
is
to
move
that
directly
east,
so
it
would
be
go
from
being
at
the
southwest
corner
of
that
intersection
to
the
southeast
corner
of
that
intersection.
Obviously,
that
application
is
not
before
you
this
evening,
but
that
is
something
that
obviously
would
be
certainly
considered
as
part
of
this
design
that
that
that
contributing
structure
would
be
relocated.
J
J
After
pretty
extensive
negotiations
with
the
city,
the
city
council
approved
a
land
sale
agreement
where,
in
consideration
of
a
500
000
in
purchase
price
and
16
workforce
housing
units
being
set
aside
in
our
project,
we
will
obtain
title
to
those
properties.
After
this
pd
contingent
upon
this
pde
being
approved,
the
right-of-way
vacating,
which
ron
touched
on,
is
probably
the
most
straightforward
component
of
this
presentation.
This
is
a
t-shaped
alley.
It's
not
really
compatible
with
any
sort
of
whole
block
redevelopment
configuration
it's
really
more,
a
relic
of
certainly
of
the
the
original
plat
subdivision.
J
Historic
preservation
staff
recommends,
recommends
approval.
We
did
not
receive
any
like
any
objections
at
all,
certainly
no
material
objections
from
any
utility
providers
and
again
to
touch
on
this
really
the
density
point.
J
We
believe
that
that
that
chopped
up
layout
of
this
block
is
really
inconsistent
with
the
r83
high
density,
comprehensive
plan,
designation
that
the
portions
of
the
site
that
are
east
of
the
north
running
alley
have
so,
let's
jump
into
the
pd
and
what
we're
proposing
we're
proposing
an
eight
star
overall,
eight
story
building,
including
parking
mixed-use
building
with
11
000
square
feet
of
ground
floor
retail
in
321
dwelling
units.
That's
just
a
touch
under
the
maximum
amount
of
density
and
intensity
that
could
be
proposed
under
the
existing
comprehensive
plan
categories.
J
J
It's
predominantly
a
one
two
bedroom
product
with
a
little
over
a
handful
of
some
three
bedroom
units
and
just
under
50
efficiencies,
and
there
are
a
total
of
517
parking
spaces
that
are
internal
to
the
building,
which
isn't
quite
as
much
as
the
code
requires
and
I'll
touch
on
that
in
the
waiver
portion
in
just
a
second
matt
and
saul
are
going
to
go
a
little
more
detail,
certainly
about
the
program
you're.
Looking
up
is
north,
certainly
on
the
left
side,
you've
got
florida
avenue.
J
The
activation
zones
are
along
florida
avenue
where,
as
I'll
talk
about
in
a
second
there's
going
to
be
eventually
an
extension
of
the
tampa
streetcar,
we,
the
activation
on
the
north
northwestern
corner
of
the
site,
is
likely
to
be
a
program.
Tenant
amenity
on
the
southwestern
corner
of
the
site
is
going
to
be
the
11
000
square
foot.
Retail
bay
access
is
interior
right
at
the
north
and
south
central
portions
and
loading
just
to
the
right
just
to
the
east
of
the
northern
access.
J
There's
two
neighborhood
amenities
I
want
to
touch
on.
The
first
is
the
pocket
park.
This
is
generally
located
in
the
vicinity
of
where
the
current
contributing
structure
is.
This
is
not
a
private
tenant
amenity.
This
will
be
open
to
the
public,
either
through
a
easement
granted
to
the
city
of
tampa
for
the
benefit
of
the
public
or
by
a
dedication
the
rendering
you
see
on
screen.
If
you
can
see
it,
when
I
don't
talk
and
the
closed
captioning
is
in
the
way
is
really
just
for
illustration.
J
Perhaps
more
impactfully
is
the
street
car
history
doesn't
always
repeat
itself,
but
it
does
rhyme,
and
if
you
look
at
that
central
illustration
on
screen,
that's
what
this
area
used
to
look
like
this
used
to
be
this
site
was
really
sandwiched
in
with
a
variety
of
street
car
lines.
There
is
a
proposal,
and
I
think
it's
more
than
just
proposals.
J
It
has
some
certain
funding
behind
it
to
extend
the
tampa
street
car
our
we
would
actually
have
a
streetcar
stop
right
in
front
of
the
site
to
the
west,
so
we
are
going
to
dedicate
10
feet
of
the
western
10,
the
10
western
feet
of
this
property
to
the
city
in
order
for
that
streetcar
station
to
to
come
to
life
eventually,
so
our
waivers,
we
have
eight
and
they
come
within
three
categories:
parking
and
access
loading,
trees,
I'm
going
to
cover
parking
and
access
and
loading
ricky
pedrica
certified
arborist
is
going
to
touch
on
trees.
J
I
think,
obviously
we
are
seeking
these
waivers
in
connection
with
the
pd
rezoning,
but
you
all
have
variance
authority
that
you
routinely
exercise
in
connections
with
certificates
of
appropriateness,
especially
having
done
significant
work
in
hyde
park.
I
don't
think
any
of
these
waiver
requests
are
going
to
look
unfamiliar
to
you
before
we
dive
into
the
specific
ones.
J
J
Given
how
close
this
site
is
to
the
central
business
district
and
how
we're
trying
to
transition
out
of
the
the
most
intense
and
dense
portions
of
the
central
business
district
into
what
is
obviously
a
historic
district?
The
middle
illustration
is
the
ssd
assessment
map.
That's
the
special
services
district,
which
the
tampa
downtown
partnership
implements.
So
I
think
it's
it's
just
noteworthy
that
this
is
a
part
of
downtown.
J
J
Cbd
periphery,
bonus
area
which
allows
residential
and
mixed
use
projects
to
double
their
proposed
density
and
intensity,
which
is
what
we're
using
to
program
the
site
as
we're
proposing
parking
first
is
a
reduction
in
the
number
of
spaces,
something
that
I
think
you
all
have
seen
with
some
regularity
here
in
the
arc.
The
second
is
a
drive,
aisle
reduction,
which
we're
presenting
that
in
the
interest
of
full
transparency.
J
I
think
it's
possible
that
that
waiver
might
not
be
needed,
but
we
want
to
explain
that
that
we're
asking
for
that
to
better
right
size,
the
circulation
patterns
within
the
parking
garage.
As
far
as
the
parking
reduction
goes
at
this
site,
we're
just
three
blocks
to
the
south,
the
total
number
of
spaces
would
be
required.
We
got
296
for
the
residential.
J
J
We
think
that
a
significant
amount
of
the
retail
traffic
here
is
going
to
be
from
within
a
walkable
vicinity,
given
the
proliferation
of
multi-family
in
this
area,
including
some
of
the
projects
you're
going
to
see
here
later
on
this
evening
and
on
the
residential
guest
space
requirement.
This,
I
think,
really
kind
of
grew
out
of
a
townhome
centered
requirement
that
for
a
project
like
this
to
have
you
know
dozens
and
dozens
of
parking
spaces
allocated
solely
to
guests.
J
We
believe
is
an
inefficient
use
of
space
parking
at
its
core
is
real
estate,
and
sometimes
it's
a
it's
a
poor
use
of
real
estate,
and
so
we
believe
that
517
parking
spaces
are
are
more
than
adequate
to
service.
This
development,
based
particularly
on
the
developers
experience
with
a
similar,
similar
product
type
access.
This
one's
pretty
easy.
We
need
a
waiver
to
obtain
commercial
access
to
a
local
street
to
our
west.
We
have
florida
avenue,
that's
the
only
non-local
street
that
borders
this
property.
J
We
can't
have
access
to
florida
avenue
because
there's
going
to
be
a
street
car
running
alongside
of
it.
So
as
a
result,
the
commercial
vehicular
traffic
to
the
site
has
to
go
on
oak
and
7th
to
the
north
and
south.
There
is
simply
no
way
to
accommodate
vehicular,
ingress
or
egress
through
through
florida
avenue,
given
first
of
all,
fdot,
wouldn't
let
us
do
it.
They've
they've
done
their
best
to
close
up
florida
avenue,
curb
cuts
that
happened
to
the
salvation
army
just
south
of
this
property.
Then
it's
simply
an.
J
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
on
that
one
unloading:
this
is
another
waiver
that
I
think
this
commission
and
the
barrier
commission
does
see
with
some
some
frequency
based
on
the
square
footage
of
the
building
the
requirements
that
we
have
for
loading
births.
What
we
are
providing
is
one
compliant
loading
berth.
That's
12
by
60.,
however,
just
west
of
that
adjoining
that
compliant
loading
birth
is
a
pretty
significant
area
that
a
a
box
truck
could
more
than
easily
use
to
load.
This
isn't
a
student
housing
housing
complex
where
everyone
moves
in
at
once.
J
We
believe
that
that
the
one
loading
birth
is
more
than
adequate
to
serve
the
residential
population,
as
well
as
the
occasional
retail
deliveries
that
might
happen.
The
continuous
waiver,
the
continuous
maneuver
waiver
number
two
on
screen,
I
think,
is
probably
becoming
one
of
the
more
common
waivers
presented
in
the
city
of
tampa.
J
This
isn't
the
fairgrounds
parking
lot,
where
trucks
can
just
freely
maneuver
without
some
measure
of
three-point,
turns
or
backing
up
in
a
tight
compact
urban
environment
like
this,
it's
simply
not
possible
to
orient
the
site
in
a
way
that
would
allow
loading
to
happen
in
one
continuous
maneuver
and
if
we
did
design
it
to
accommodate
that,
I
I
don't
think
you
all
would
probably
like
what
the
end
product
resulted
in.
J
So
we
think
that's
justified
really
by
the
again,
the
tightness
of
the
site,
the
reductions
justified
by
the
utilization
and
then
the
fact
that
again,
the
opportunity
cost
of
four
loading
spaces
is
pretty
dire
on
a
site.
That's
as
tight
as
this
is
in
the
continuous
maneuver.
We
believe
that
there's
no
injury
to
any
third
parties,
that's
going
to
result
from
from
the
granting
of
that
waiver,
and
with
that,
I'm
going
to
turn
things
over
to
ricky
padarica
our
arborist,
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
tree
waivers.
K
L
Thank
you,
ricky
pederica,
dark,
moss,
308,
east
7th
avenue.
I've
been
sworn
I've
forgotten,
powerpoint
back
up.
L
Started:
okay,
sorry,
so
there
are
three
tree
waivers
that
are
being
requested
in
associated
with
this
application.
There
is
a
removal
of
a
non-hazardous
one.
Non-Hazardous
grand
tree
live
oak
relatively
in
the
center
of
the
property,
there's
a
reduction
in
the
required
minimum
retention
percentage
from
fifty
percent
to
zero
percent
and
a
waiver
to
contribute
remaining
mitigation
contribution
inches
for
trees
that
can't
be
replanted
on
site
into
the
applicable
planning
district
tree
fund.
L
As
noted
in
the
complaint,
and
with
this
building
typology
in
this
high
density
area,
it
restricts
or
constrains
the
ability
to
preserve
trees
that,
where
normally
perimeter
trees
may
be
able
to
be
preserved,
we're
trying
to
create
activated
right-of-way
edges
and
for
the
grand
tree
it's
being
located
so
interior
to
the
property
and
specifically
in
conflict
with
the
footprint
of
the
parking
garage
it
would.
J
Thanks
for
coming
now,
patentler
is
going
to
weigh
in
a
little
bit
about
how
the
developer
found
this
project
and
some
more
on
their
background.
N
Hey
everyone
I'm
pat
and
troller.
I
represent
lecture
capital.
We
are
a
tampa-based
private
equity
firm
and
we're
co-developers
in
the
capital
behind
the
project.
I'm
a
fourth
generation
tampenian.
I
live
about
a
mile
from
the
site,
probably
for
the
past
five
years,
I've
driven
by
the
site,
at
least
once
maybe
twice
a
day,
so
I'm
pretty
familiar
as
a
tamponian.
I've
watched
the
tampa
heights
sub
market
flourish
over
the
past
10
to
15
years.
N
N
N
As
far
as
my
particular
role
in
this
deal,
I
was
largely
responsible
for
sourcing
the
land.
The
land
was
sourced
from
four
separate
property
owners,
one
of
which
was
the
city
of
tampa,
who
has
been
extremely
supportive
throughout
the
entire
process
and
are
excited
to
see
this
development
hopefully
go
through.
N
As
far
as
additional
support
for
the
project,
we've
got
a
long
list
of
people,
individuals,
business
owners.
We
have
property
owners
like
the
icardis,
paul
weekley
and
mike
cass.
We've
got
developers
like
the
soto
capital,
guys
who
are
excited
about
seeing
development
move
east
of
florida
and
tampa
avenues.
N
We
have
the
salvation
army,
who
you
know,
I'm
not
sure
if
they
they
arrive
today,
but
they're
going
to
be
here
for
additional
support
for
whatever
other
hearings
we
need.
As
far
as
you
know,
local
businesses,
restaurants
bars.
You
know
everyone-
we've
talked
to
has
been
ecstatic
about.
N
The
project
groups
like
richard
gosmar,
the
columbia
king
state
cathedral,
cigars,
hidden,
springs
magnanimous
brewery,
hawkers,
pretty
much
everything
along
north
florida,
everyone's
been
a
proponent
of
the
project
and
then,
of
course,
the
civic
association
we
presented
to
them
three,
four
or
five
times
we're
going
to
present
to
them
again
here
in
about
a
week
and
a
half
and
hope
to
have
some
level
of
support
from
them.
N
O
O
Hopefully
this
project
I
share
patins
enthusiasm,
obviously
not
just
for
tampa,
but
for
this
area
in
tampa,
specifically
we're
seeing
a
lot
of
activity-
and
you
know
we're
excited-
hopefully
be
a
part
of
that
and
continue
to
bring
really
solid
good
architecture
to
some
of
the
you
know
best
markets
in
the
us,
if
not,
if
not
the
best,
so
I
have
a
few
slides
here.
Do
I
need
to
do
anything
for
I
go
old
school,
I
don't
have
the
powerpoint.
O
Beautiful
so
it
hit.
D
O
Thank
you,
so
I
wanted
to
highlight
a
little
bit
specifically
about
the
programming
a
little
bit
about,
obviously
our
setbacks,
our
massing,
heightened
width.
You
know
some
of
the
guidelines,
obviously
that
that
are
out
there
and
and
how
we're
complying
with
that
and
then
obviously
saul
will
jump
in
and
and
provide
all
of
all
of
the
feedback
that
obviously
he's
an
expert
in
providing.
O
So
as
we
look
at
the
overall
programming,
as
you
can
see,
what
we
have
is
a
six
story
structure
and
a
six
story
with
a
basement
that
abuts
north
florida
and
as
it
scales
down
more
towards
the
residential
area,
we
scale
it
down
to
a
five
story.
O
Specifically,
as
we
talk
about
setbacks,
you'll
see
that
obviously
we
have.
The
city
has
requested
a
10-foot
setback.
All
along
north
florida
and
we're
excited
to
have,
hopefully,
the
the
t
and
the
trolley
run
right
along
there
and
have
a
stop
right
there.
We
think
that'll
be
a
great
amenity
for
our
tenants
as
well,
as
you
know
something
great
for
the
city
as
as
we
move
forward
down
to
the
south,
it
is
a
two
foot
setback
consistent
with
the
majority
of
that
site
from
the
southeast
corner.
O
All
the
way
to
the
edge
of
the
garage
is
commercial
space
consistent
with
the
every
other
commercial
use
in
the
district.
There
is
minimal
to
no
setbacks
when
it
comes
to
activation
with
the
street
along
our
eastern
setback.
It
is
a
five
foot
setback
as
we
look
at
the
new
townhome
development
to
our
east.
That
is
a
one
foot
setback
at
the
porch.
O
I
believe
it
scales
up
to
as
big
as
a
four
to
five
foot
setback,
so
we
are
greater
than
our
equal
to,
if
not
greater
than
the
townhomes
that
will
be
built
immediately
across
the
street.
So,
consistent
with
that
setback
and
and
that,
as
I
mentioned
this
city
park,
we're
scaling
that
back
and
along
the
northern
street
we're
at
a
seven
foot
setback
and
obviously
that's
across
the
street
from
a
16
story.
High
rise.
So,
as
I
look
at
you
know
our
setbacks
and
our
programming.
O
You'll
notice,
some
imagery
that
we've
surrounded
to
show
a
little
bit
of
additional
contextual
design
and
contextual
buildings
that
we've
used
to
help
inspire
how
we
set
up
our
setback.
O
O
The
ymca
is
the
south
east
building.
That
is,
you
can
yeah.
You
can
see
a
little
bit
of
this
orange
roof
right
here
again
minimal
to
I
don't
want
to
say
no
setbacks,
but
there
is
minimal
setbacks
for
the
hedging
along
the
roadway
there,
and
then
obviously
you
have
the
16
story,
high
rise
and
then,
as
you've
seen
a
couple
times.
That's
our
view
heading
down
to
see
to
the
downtown
area.
O
So
next
up
is
just
a
little
bit
of
additional,
as
we
look
through
tampa
heights,
specifically
within
the
historic
district
of
tampa
heights.
As
we
look
at
contextual
buildings
and
other
areas
for
inspiration
with
our
design
and
our
setbacks
and
our
massing
and
our
scale,
every
other
commercial
building
within
the
district
again
is
set
as
close
proximity
to
the
sidewalk.
O
As
you
can
see,
there
is
minimal
to
no
setbacks
on
the
balance
of
these
properties.
Top
right
is
sanctuary,
and
you
know
what
what
is
really
compelling
about
this
building
is
it.
You
know
it
shows
how
well
you
know
between
single-family
homes
and
more
dense
product,
how
it
already
co-exists
and
and
performs,
and
what
we
think
speaks
mainly
to
the
eclectic
nature
of
the
architecture
and
the
design
within
the
historic
district
of
tampa
heights.
O
So
I
want
to
talk,
then
a
little
bit
about
kind
of
the
massing
and
relative
to
to
our
our
neighbors.
Obviously,
here's
the
vicinity
map
what
you're
looking
at
is
a
west
facing.
So
if
it's
as,
if
we
are
on
morgan,
looking
towards
north
florida,
this
is
our
property
to
the
north
in
the
historic
district.
It's
a
16
story.
High
rise,
you'll
see
we're
at
six
stories
and
we
scale
down
to
five
stories
along
along
morgan.
O
And
just
to
in
in
context,
this
area
right
here
is
where
the
park
at
park
will
be,
and
then
here
is
two
other
views.
The
first
view
here
on
the
top.
This
is
looking
north
morgan
running
down
here
in
north
florida
working
here,
and
you
can
see
where
we've
tried
to
work
with
the
topography
of
the
site.
Tampa
doesn't
have
the
most
undulation
and
topography,
but
actually
this
site
does
have
about
a
20-foot
fall
from
the
northeast
corner
to
the
southwest
corner.
So
within
a
relatively.
O
O
Obviously,
given
the
victorian
style
of
those
town
homes,
where
we're
at
five
stories
and
to
me
again,
I
think
it
it
speaks
to
a
relative
and
an
appropriate
height
and
a
hope,
an
appropriate
mass
compared
to
our
adjacent
property
and
then
what
we've
done,
although
it
does
go
to
six
stories,
given
the
topography
change,
excuse
me
of
the
site,
as
you
are
standing
on
a
morgan
looking
west,
it
will
not
feel
like
it
is
growing
because
of
the
the
opportunity
it
will
feel
and
our
renderings
will
provide
a
little
bit
additional
contextual
evidence
of
that
and
then
on
the
bottom
here.
O
This
is
showing
the
current
condition.
It
does
not
show
where
the
current
historic
structure
will
be
relocated.
That
will
be
relocated
in
this
area
right
here.
But
what
we've
done
is,
as
you
can
see,
right
now,
is
really
try
to
pull
back
as
much
of
the
building
from
that
area
as
possible
to
create
not
only
a
great
amenity
to
the
community,
but
also
provide
additional
buffer
between
the
different
densities
of
the
adjacent
properties.
O
I'm
going
to
let
saul
touch
a
little
bit
more
on
the
specific,
architectural
and
inspiration
as
we
move
forward
and
and
obviously
look
forward
to,
hopefully
continuing
to
partner
with
this
commission
and
the
city
as
we
work
through
the
design,
and
so
this
is
rendering
only
a
starting
point
is
the
way
we
look
at
it.
And
hopefully
you
know
a
great
starting
point
to
create
a
beautiful
asset
that
we're
all
going
to
be
proud
of
for
years
to
come.
P
I'm
sol
fleischmann,
I'm
ceo
of
fleischmann,
garcia
architecture,
324
hyde
park
avenue.
I
serve
as
a
design
and
historic
consultant
for
this
apartment
project
in
historic,
tampa
heights.
I
have
a
little
bit
of
qualifications
for
this.
I
over
our
practice.
We've
done
six
major
projects
in
the
tampa
heights:
historic
district,
the
bob
gilbertson
ymca,
the
ferguson
law
center,
stetson
university,
college
of
law,
the
patricia
sullivan
elementary
school
in
the
additions
to
metropolitan
ministries
and,
last
but
not
least,
the
rebuild
of
the
tampa
heights
elementary
school
and
a
bit
of
trivia.
P
P
P
P
P
H
I
want
to
just
footnote
my
comments
at
this
point
as
saying
that
much
of
the
presentation
that
we
saw
particularly
towards
the
end
with
the
architectural
references
staff
has
not
seen
prior
to
this
hearing
this
evening,
so
some
of
that
has
changed.
However,
our
staff
report
really
did
focus
on
the
site
plan
itself,
because
the
certificate
of
appropriateness
will
be
coming
back
at
a
subsequent
time
and
there
will
be
a
specific
staff
report
to
deal
with
the
ca
when
it's
scheduled.
H
I
want
to
bring
to
your
reference
that
the
new
construction
portion
of
the
tampa
heights
design
guidelines
are
are
found
on
page
42
of
those
guidelines,
and
that
became
the
basis
for
much
of
how
the
staff
report
is
laid
out
and
those
elements
to
become
somewhat
fixed
by
the
pd,
usually
the
first
five
elements
of
of
new
construction
or
what
was
emphasized
so
dealing
with
the
first
of
that
scale,
which
is
the
height
and
the
width.
H
This
is
obviously
an
area
of
the
district
that
was
impacted
heavily
over
the
years
through
demolition
and
redevelopment,
but
it
was
envisioned
eventually
that
there
would
be
redevelopment
that
could
present
either
a
positive
or
an
adverse
effect
to
the
district.
So
these
areas
were
included
within
the
district
boundaries.
H
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
each
of
these
elements
with
within
the
staff
report,
you
have
those
those
have
been
provided
you,
but
to
you
in
advance.
But
I
did
want
to
point
out.
One
of
the
references
is
the
palm
avenue
baptist
tower
apartment.
That's
immediately
to
the
north
of
this
site.
It's
about
a
16
tower
16
story
tower
that
was
constructed
in
1974.
H
H
You
know
many
of
the
references
that
were
shown
in
the
presentation
were
individual
buildings
or
perhaps
a
section,
a
segment
of
block,
one
of
the
issues
that
the
staff
recognizes
that
we're
dealing
with
the
entire
block,
as
opposed
to
just
a
parcel
or
two
with
on
on
the
block
and
these
elements
of
massing
and
building
form
compo,
combined
with
the
scale
somewhat
compound
the
challenges
in
bringing
a
building.
H
That's
in
compliance
with
the
historic
patterns
through
a
a
comprehensive
building
type
such
as
a
single
building
with
a
central
parking
facility
such
as
is
being
presented
today.
So
that
was
you
know,
a
reason
that
the
increased
setbacks
were
emphasized
within
the
staff
report,
so
that
there
would
be
somewhat
of
a
relationship
of
scale
and
mass
to
the
ability
to
have
increased
setbacks
and
introduce
elements
onto
the
building
that
are
a
characteristic
of
the
tampa
heights.
H
Historic
district,
namely
projections,
encroachments,
porches,
stoops
this
these
stars,
these
sort
of
art
attributes
that
define
the
character
of
the
area.
H
Setbacks
is
an
area
that
I'd
like
you
to
pay
special
concern
to.
I
think
you
know
you
have
a
multi-faceted
building
that
has
both
commercial.
It
has
some
commercial
elements
along
florida
avenue
and
I
believe
some
which
extend
on
7th
avenue
is
also,
but
it
also
features
residential
uses
within
the
building.
H
So
I
think
there's
some
opportunities
for
some
commercial
setback
patterns
along
florida
avenue,
which
is
obviously
a
historic
commercial
corridor,
and
and
has
many
references
for
reduced
setbacks
and
encroachments
of
awnings
and
balconies
and
whatnot,
whereas,
as
you
begin
to
approach
the
more
residential
components
of
the
district
as
you
move
to
the
east,
the
buildings
should
begin
to
respect
those
patterns
as
well.
H
There
was
some
reference
to
an
adjacent
project
that
was
approved
on
a
parcel
to
the
east
and
the
setbacks
in
that
building.
But
just
if
you
recall,
there
were
porch
porches
on
that
building
as
well.
That
were
part
of
that
setback,
area,
orientation
and
site
coverage
is
another
element
within
the
design
guidelines
that
you
should
pay
attention
to,
ensuring
that
the
building
undulates
and
creates
opportunities
to
not
only
break
the
mass
of
the
building,
but
to
provide
opportunities
for
some
green
space
alignment
rhythm
and
spacing.
H
We
were
encouraging
the
architect
when
they
do
get
into
the
design
phase,
to
introduce
techniques,
to
visually
break
up
the
long
facades
into
smaller
components
and,
as
I
said
before,
that
can
be
considered
during
the
certificate
of
appropriateness
process.
But
the
site
plan
does
dictate
strongly
how
that
can
occur
along
a
building
elevation
and
then
our
entrances
and
porch
projections,
obviously
particularly
with
residential
references.
H
We
did
add
some
notes
and
conditions
at
the
end
of
the
staff
report.
I
think,
as
you
as
you
begin
your
discussion.
If
you
move
towards
a
recommendation
for
approval
to
pay
special
attention
to
this
area,
because
any
types
of
conditions
the
city
council
does
place
on
the
site
plan
will
then
carry
through
in
the
requirements
of
how
this
board
can
approach
the
project
during
the
ca
process.
H
The
the
waivers
that
were
reviewed
by
the
presenters
did
capture
the
eight
that
I
had
on
the
staff
report.
I
didn't
comment
very
much
on
the
waivers.
I
feel
that's
a
decision
that
the
board
needs
to
consider
those
are
essentially
deviations
from
what
the
codes
require.
H
I
have
annie
barnes,
who
is
with
the
zoning
division
and
can
provide
you
more
specifics
on
any
questions
that
you
might
have
on
the
site
plan
or
the
waivers
she
is
in
the
audience
and
and
is
ready
to
answer
questions
that
you
may
have
with
that.
I'll
conclude
my
staff
report
and
be
available
for
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
D
Thank
you
dennis.
Excuse
me
we'll
now
open
the
hearing
up
to
public
comment.
If
there
is
anyone
here
who
would
like
to
speak
for
against,
please
come
forward
and
if
you
have
not
been
sworn
in,
please
let
us
know
and
we'll
get
you
sworn
in
and
then,
when
you
do
come
up,
please
state
your
name
and
your
address.
B
Okay,
my
name
is
justin
rickey.
My
address
is
103
east
26th
avenue,
I'm
a
tampa
heights
resident,
I'm
also
the
vice
president
of
the
tampa
heights.
Civic
association-
I'm
not
here
in
this
particular
case
in
official
capacity,
just
want
to
give
you
my
feedback.
In
general,
the
developers
met
with
us
several
times.
We've
had
several
discussions
with
them.
They've
been
very
amenable
to
communicating
with
the
neighborhood
working
with
us
in
regards
to
addressing
any
concerns
we
had
about
the
development,
particularly,
we
were
really
impressed
that
they
had
a
component
for
affordable
housing.
B
As
you
know,
that's,
while
not
too
relevant
in
these
auspices.
I
would
say
that
it's
a
big
concern
for
us
and
they
addressed
a
lot
of
those
concerns,
as
well
as
activating
the
commercial
corridor,
which
is
a
big
concern
for
us.
As
we
see
florida
avenue
continue
to
be
developed
and
oftentimes
not
to
its
highest
and
best
use.
This
gentleman
did
did
exactly
what
what
we're
looking
for,
which
is
really
activate
that
space,
and
to
that
point,
that's
really
what
we
need
as
a
community
to
drive
that
street
car
drive.
B
Multimodal
transit
really
drive
good
development
in
a
neighborhood
and,
from
my
perspective,
what
I've
seen
is
a
a
partner
in
the
community,
that's
willing
to
work
with
the
community
to
help
us
grow
in
a
positive
way.
So
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
your
time
and
I
hope
that
you
approve
this
project.
Thank
you.
A
Hi
rachelle
gross
1602
east
third
avenue
tampa
33605.
I
just
have
three
quick
comments.
Neither
speaking
for
nor
against
it
one.
The
historic
marker
was
placed
on
that
southwest
corner
years
ago
by
the
civic
association,
because
we
felt
it
was
important
that
people
realized
that
this
was
the
gateway
to
historic,
tampa
heights.
A
There
clearly
wasn't
very
much
there,
then
the
houses
and
offices
on
oak
avenue
are
reliant
on
street
parking
and
when
the
new
townhouses
come
online,
I
think
that's
going
to
get
tight
and
third,
I'm
happy
that
all
the
parties
involved
are
willing
to
move
that
historic
house
to
the
adjacent
lot,
because
I
feel
it
will
be
a
much
more
appropriate
home
considering
this
development.
Thank
you.
D
H
H
That,
if
you
like
this
time,.
H
They're
related
to
the
vacating,
your
your
recommendation
falls
under
the
same
section
of
the
code
I'll
skip
reading
that,
but
we
also
reference
the
secretary
of
the
interior
standards
as
it
affects
elements
of
the
relationship
of
the
district
itself.
H
I
out
reference
that
our
normal
position
on
alleys
is
that
we
recommend
for
them
to
be
retained
in
this
particular
situation.
With
the
with
the
absence
of
historic
structures,
it
doesn't
seem
to
serve
a
practical
use
at
this
particular
time.
Nor
does
the
proposed
development
rely
upon
that
type
of
vehicular
circulation
and
access.
D
C
Actually
kamaria
pettis
mackel
from
the
city
attorney's
office,
the
agent
mr
hudson
exp,
stated
that
the
request
for
this
project
is
for
a
total
number
of
units
of
321..
J
Tyler,
what's
in
for
the
applicant,
the
planning
commission
staff
outlined
in
their
report
as
part
of
the
drc
package
that,
because
the
future
land
use
for
this
site
is
split,
recall,
there's
that
t
alley
the
one
the
one
that
runs
north
south
divides
the
property,
obviously
into
a
western
piece,
an
eastern
piece.
J
The
western
piece
is
being
developed
based
on
a
1.5
far,
which
is
the
by
right
density,
allowed
in
cc35
for
projects
that
are
over
0.35
acres
and
which
are
vertically
integrated
mixed
use,
which
the
planning
commission
has
has
agreed
that
that
we
comply
with
that
requirement
on
the
eastern
portion.
R83
allows
you
to
go
up
to
83
83
units
per
acre
with
the
the
basic
sort
of
upgrade
bonus
and
then
in
the
cbd
periphery,
which
you
were
called
in.
One
of
the
slides.
J
C
J
Sure,
yes
and
there's
amenities
that
I
mentioned
the
streetcar
and
the
pocket
park.
Those
are
the
amenities
that
we're
providing
in
accordance
with
the
bonus
payment
agreement
that
will
be
adopted
by
city
council
at
second
reading.
One
of
our
last
site
plan
notes
as
part
of
the
pd
that
you're
reviewing
has
the
code
required
language
about
that.
So
that's
that's
the
amenities
that
are
being
provided
in
exchange
for
our
ability
to
get
to
to
get
above
the
83
units
per
acre.
J
Sure
I
can
show
you
the
site
plan,
what
one
nuance,
commissioner,
that
makes
that
a
little
bit
challenging
is
that
it
is
currently
mixed
zoning
with
some
rm24,
but
the
northern
portions
of
the
site
are
a
pd.
So
it's
for
a
specifically
site
plan,
controlled
zoning
district
of
a
form
and
dimension
that
that
wouldn't
work
with
the
existing
rm24
euclidean
zoning.
That's
that's
part
of
the
property.
G
Yeah,
I
understand
that
point,
because
what
I'm
trying
to
wrap
my
imagination
around
is.
G
G
So
what
I
was
asking
is,
did
you
have,
or
what
did
you
have
available
to
us
some
sort
of
graphic
presentation
as
to
what
the
current
development
constraints
may
be
and
where
you
are
pushing
this
envelope
to
the
benefit
of
your
project?
So
that
we
can
evaluate
that
benefit
towards
the
benefit
of
the
existing
massing
and
scaling
of
traditional
tampa
heights,
I
think.
O
O
O
Under
the
cbd
periphery
bonus
that
we
get
to
double
the
density,
whether
and
it's
to
the
max
beneficiary
of
the
developer,
so
we
can
choose
far
or
units,
and
so
for
our
on
the
r83
side,
we
have
chosen
to
double
the
units
to
where
we
can
get
to
164
per
acre
on
those
parcels
that
are
east
of
the
t,
alleyway
valley,
yes,
and
everything
to
the
west.
We
are
allowed
to
do
an
far,
so
there
is
not
a
height
restriction.
There
is
not
a
setback.
O
It
is
a
maximum
far
that
we
are
allowed
to
develop,
and
so
what
we
have
done
is
we
have
maximized
our
far
under
that
bonus
provision
plus
the
cb
d
periphery
bonus.
So
I
don't
know
if
so
I
guess
I
what
we
don't
have
to
answer
your
question
more
directly.
I
apologize.
We
do
not
have
a
depiction,
because
what
we
have
proposed
is
within
the
maximum
height
density
site
plan
that
is
allowed.
Am
I
am.
I
misspeaking.
O
I
I
cannot
speak
to
the
motives
of
tampa
city.
All
I
can
say
is
the
zoning
that
they
have
put
in
place.
We
are
in
compliance
with
the
existing
rules
and
regulations
that
the
city
of
tampa
has
outlined
for
us.
D
But
in
order
in
order
to
answer
the
underlying
question
that
I
believe
was
put
forth,
was
there
a
study
done
with
the
existing
zoning
in
place
not
coming
forward
and
asking
for
the
rezoning
that
showed
your
max
allowable?
And
I
understand
the
overlay.
But
in
terms
of
just
straight
on
zoning
questions,
the
r83,
the
rm24?
O
Rezoning,
I
don't
we
have
I
not
that
I
am
a
aware
of
again
because
it
is
within.
You
know.
I
think
about
that
yeah.
Please
do
and.
J
Sure
I'd
like
to
clarify
two
things:
matt
alluded
to
you
know
the
density
and
things
like
that
being
by
right
to
be
clear.
The
densities
that
we
are
proposing
are
conditioned
upon
the
approval
of
that
bonus
agreement
by
city,
council
and
second
reading.
So
I
want
to
be
very
clear
and
transparent
about
that
again,
one
I
don't
have
exactly,
but
generally
speaking,
this
portion
here
is
our
rm24,
but
up
here
you
had
entire.
J
The
existing
zoning
is
controlled
by
a
site
plant,
I
believe
for
predominantly
an
office
building,
so
there's
really
no
way
to
reconcile
the
the
existing
today.
Zoning
regulations,
which
you
know
the
amendment
to
the
zoning
map
for
this
piece
here,
was
a
specific
office
based
pd
for
the
rm24
portion.
Here
I
think
florida
would
be
considered
the
front
yard
say
the
setback
would
be
25
feet
in
seven
feet
in
from
the
side,
so
really
the
best
we
could
do
to
frankenstein.
G
L
Let
me
provide
the
site
plan
to
illustrate
what
we're
looking
at
the
grand
tree
in
question.
Is
this
tree
here?
It's
a
40
inch
live
oak,
it
is
currently
located
and
I
can
pull
up
a
picture
on
my
ipad
if
that
would
help
in
the
side
yard
between
an
office,
the
existing
sean
braun
law
office
building
here
and
the
trc
west
development
there.
Roughly
here-
and
I
know
I've
got
no
no
sight
plane
existing
side
plane
showing
but
bear
with
me.
L
L
I'm
not
gonna
be
able
to
do
the
math
map,
but,
let's
just
say,
20
feet
of
uninterrupted
per
impervious
well
established
routes
which
we
don't
currently
have
in
the
existing
condition.
D
E
C
C
D
Well,
I'm
gonna
follow
up
with
that
question,
so
there
are
several
things
we
that
you
covered
in
the
waivers,
but
I
didn't
see
any
supporting
diagrams.
So
one
of
those
is
the
turning
radius,
the
loading
dock,
all
of
that
the
loading
birth.
So
if
you
could
just
walk
us
through
how
how
a
truck
that
might
be
either
delivering
products
for
the
retail
components
or
delivering
furniture
whatever
for
the
residential
use
would
enter
turn
that
kind
of
thing.
Yes,
commissioner,.
J
B
H
D
B
But
understood
okay,
so
so,
if
you
were
coming
into
the
loading
area-
and
this
is
the
trash
here,
so
it's
enclosed
with
inside
the
building.
So
for
instance,
if
let's
just
talk
about
solid
waste
for
a
second,
then
we
can
go
to
loading.
Solid
waste
would
pull
up
in
in
in
the
direction
going
eastbound
and
then
they
would
back
into
that
area
and
then
they
would
either
pull
out
a
trash
compactor
or
they
would
come
in
and
those
those
roller
out
bins
would
be
outside
and
they
would
pick
them
up.
B
B
Right
now
we're
showing
roll
out
bins,
so
they
would
be
front
fork,
lift
overhead
and
come
down
and
so
there's
40
feet
from
the
right
away
line
to
the
face
of
the
building.
Next
to
it,
you
have
a
12
foot
by
60
foot
loading
bay
and
that
is
for
larger
vehicles
and,
frankly,
that's
a
pretty
large
vehicle.
I
mean
that's
a
wb
50,
that's
parked
in
that
location,
but
again
they
would
pull
it
up
and
then
back
in
and
come
into
that
space.
B
Most
likely
I
mean
from
move-ins,
and
you
know,
cisco
trucks
and
things
delivering
for
smaller
things.
They're,
probably
not
going
to
be
a
60-foot
sized
truck,
they're,
probably
box
trucks
and
smaller
type
vehicles,
but
they
would
still
have
that
60-foot
area
to
to
back
into
and
then
they
could
pull
back
out
on.
You
know
going
oak
more
than
likely
to
florida.
O
B
Two
two-way
accesses
and
there
and
there's
two
of
them
so
remember
that
if
you
remember
the
elevations,
I
believe
saul
and
matt
had
shown.
There's
there's
almost
a
15
to
20
foot
fall
over
the
site.
So
on
north
side
you
have
oak,
which
has
a
24
foot,
drive
and
goes
into
the
garage
and
then
circulates
throughout
the
parking
garage
also
down
on
7th
avenue.
D
Just
to
make
sure
I
get
all
of
them,
why
is
it
that
we're
requesting
or
that
your
team
is
requesting
the
reduction
of
the
dry
vials
from
26
to
24
feet?
I
know
why,
but
for
the
record,
if
you
could,
if
you
could
tell
us
why.
B
D
B
D
J
Tyler
outside
for
the
applicant
we're
continuing
to
work
with
staff
on
on
whether
the
waiver
is
is
applicable
to
the
site.
Obviously,
if
the
code
is
24,
it's
not
needed,
but
in
the
interest
of
transparency
and
making
sure
that
the
record
that
comes
out
of
tonight
to
city
council's
most
complete,
we
do
want
to
keep
the
waiver
in
the
record,
and
I
think
matt
can
maybe
allude
to
some
of
the
programming
reasons
about
why
that
reduction
is
preferred.
C
O
Yeah
happy
to
comment-
and
one
thing
I
did
want
to
highlight
too-
that
there's
another
loading
for
move-ins
and
move-outs
can.
C
O
O
Outside,
but
you
know
not
the
majority,
in
our
experience,
the
majority
of
folks
that
are
moving
into
a
750
to
a
thousand
square
foot
space
you're,
we
will
I've
not
seen
a
an
18
wheeler,
pull
up
to
any
of
our
properties
throughout
the
u.s
in
terms
of
the
20-foot.
For
us,
that's
just
best
practices
on
on
every
parking
garage
in
terms
of
structural
and
in
terms
of
movement
that
we
have
never
had
an
issue.
O
O
It
provides
still
ample
vehicular
movements
without
a
risk
of
obviously
damages
in
rear
ends,
and
it
allows
us
to
to
create
a
more
cost
efficient
design
which
allows
us
ultimately
to
provide
a
a
better
product
at
a
lower
price
to
our
tenants
in
the
city
and
obviously
on
a
site
like
this,
where
we
do
have
a
exterior
garage
facing
to
the
south.
We're
looking
to
minimize
the
the
impact
of
of
that
garage
on
the
exterior
as
well.
O
So
although
it's
only
four
feet,
you
know,
we've
got
to
do
everything
we
can
to
create
the
best
architectural
design
that
we
can
and
so
limiting
that
space
that
we
need
to.
As
you
saw
in
our
renderings,
we
threw
some
you
know,
creating
some
false
balconies
and
some
faux
cutouts
to
to
create
more
windows
and
more
breakups
the
smaller.
That
area
allows
us
to
to
be
a
little
bit
more
creative
as
we
move
through
the
design
criteria
versus
trying
to
so
sorry
long.
C
G
Prepared
to
provide
parallel
on
street
parking,
north,
south
and
east
side
of
the
site
is
that
correct,
so.
O
O
Yeah,
our
revised
site
plan
did
not
include
the
off-street
market,
is.
O
Sorry
I
answered
the
wrong
question.
Of
course
we
are
offering
them
as
an
amenity,
but
we
are
not,
including
those
same
with
the
loading
zones.
You'll
see
that
there
are
two
loading
zones
that
we
are
providing
outside,
but
it
is
just
since
they
are
outside
of
our
technically
our
building
footprint,
we're
not
including
or
our
land
we're,
not
including
those
in
part
of
our
calculations.
G
So
I
now
have
a
part
b
to
this
question.
Okay,
see
if
I
can
answer
this
one
right:
okay,
so
you're
going
to
be
you're
going
to
be
pushing
back,
then
the
curb
line
into
your
site
to
provide
these
parking
spaces.
This
site
is
currently
ringed
with
some
very
to
us
very
significant.
You
know
granite
curving.
O
Okay,
one
thing
we
are
excited
about
and
this
isn't
I
don't
think
it's
it's
relevant
to
this
question.
A
relative
is
we're
excited
to
work,
hopefully
with
saving
as
much
as
the
historic,
brick
and
sort
grant,
as
we
can
and
hopefully
do
it
in
a
really
compelling
way
throughout
the
public
park
and
throughout
our
our
public
parks
throughout
throughout
the
design.
O
G
F
We
have
one
real,
quick
question
for
the
arborist.
What
is
the
current
condition
of
the
grand
tree.
L
You've
got
eureka
dark
moss.
Thank
you
for
the
question.
Let
me
get
things
loaded
up
and
I'll
go
back
a
little
bit.
This
is
the
hopefully.
This
is
legible
enough.
This
is
the
tree
in
question.
Looking
back
at
my
notes
from
this
assessment,
a
tree
of
this
size
would
require
a
27-foot
minimum
root
area.
L
L
Shot
looking
from
the
north
south
towards
the
tree,
seven
seventh
avenue
is
in
the
distance
unseen.
I
found
the
tree
to
be
good
health,
good
structure
and
excellent
form,
considering
and
with
a
combined
condition
hazard
rating
of
the
city's
a
system
of
a
b6
which
would
be,
I
would
characterize
as
a
good
truth.
F
Based
on
your
experience
to
follow
that
up,
then,
obviously
there's
going
to
be
some
sort
of
demolition
or
something's
going
to
happen
around
this
tree
at
some
point
with,
what's
there
based
just,
unfortunately
strictly
on
your
experience,
what
happens
to
the
condition
of
this
tree?
If
and
when
that
ever
happens,.
L
F
My
last
question
is
for
I
guess
someone
else
in
the
group
in
regards
to
the
setbacks
and
just
how
close
this
entire
building
seems
to
be
to
the
max.
F
O
O
So
we
did
revise
it
to
create
what
we
thought
or
what
we
really
feel
is
a
really
compelling
amenity
to
the
community
and
create
the
buffer
in
the
most
critical
area,
which
is
to
the
lesser
dense
areas
of
the
community.
Given
that
the
entire
half
of
the
block
directly
apart
to
these
will
be
a
four
and
a
half
story
with
the
pitched
roof.
It's
four
stories
with
a
pitched
roof.
O
D
F
D
So
there
was
also
another
one,
so
I
think
I
think
it's
still
represented
somewhat
in
here,
but
can
we
see
the
one
that
goes
east
or
north
south
through
that
yeah?
The
two
of
those
together?
That's
perfect,
so
I
think
there's
some
dis
ingenuous
and
it's
it's
it's.
You
know
it's
neither
here
nor
there,
but
in
reality,
you're
building
on
florida
is
an
eight-story
building,
because
you
have
to
take
into
account
your
mechanical
space,
which
I
assume
is
what
you're
doing
what
you're
hiding
in
the
rooftop
forms.
O
D
So
what
is
happening
if
anything
in
those
spaces
above
floor
number,
six
and
floor
number
five.
O
So
when
we
originally
proposed
the
elevations,
it
was
a
a
more
basic
design
element
where
we
just
had
parapets
and
it
was
more
of
a
flat
roof,
but
obviously
working
with
saul
and
and
the
design
team.
We
felt
that
this
was
a
best
faith
effort
to
show
that
or
first
initial
steps
and
showing
some
of
the
design
elements
that
we
can
bring
to
a
building
to
make
it
more
consistent
and
congruent
with
the
tamp
heights
design
criteria.
O
By
no
means
is
this
set
in
stone
that
they
need
to
be
this
height
or
this
form
or
this
it
was.
This
was
and
saw
like
correct
me,
and
I
apologize
if
I
misspeak.
These
are
architectural
details
that
were
implemented
now
to
create
you
know,
ideas
as
we
progress
to
the
certificate
of
appropriateness,
some
areas
that
he
said
matt.
These
are
ideas:
that'll
create
a
greater
consistency
with
with
tampa
heights,
but
obviously
opened
hey.
Is
there
ways
that
we
can
create
less
pitch?
O
Is
there
ways
that
we
can
create
less
hype
visually?
Obviously,
we
we
really
look
forward
to
having
those
discussions
and
refining.
How
do
we
create
a
a
building
that
feels
less
than
eight
stories
and
more
consistent
with
that
and.
D
I
appreciate
that
I
mean
I
understand
where
your
architect
is
coming
from,
and
I
do
appreciate
that
there
is
some
some
beginnings
of
that
idea
of
breaking
the
form
and
trying
to
break
the
block.
D
But
I
do
think
when
we're
talking
about
the
heights
of
things,
we
need
to
be
very
careful
about
it's
a
six
story
when
it's
really
an
aid
story
and-
and
in
fact
you
know
the
the
paperwork
that
we
get.
It
does
say
eight
stories
so
just
as
a
matter
of
moving
forward
with
any
project
and
coming
back
before
us
again
just
point
those
things
out,
because
it
does
help
us
understand
exactly
what's
going
on,
and
you
know,
especially
with
that
particular
section,
with
the
16
story
tower
across
the
street.
D
All
right:
well
then,
you
do
have
five
minutes.
J
Evening
tyler
hudson
for
the
applicant,
as
dennis
alluded
to
you
at
the
beginning
that
the
charge
this
this
evening
is
is
what
is
a
reasonable
land
use
change,
and
this
piece
of
land
does
present
some
novelties,
it's
not
in
downtown,
but
it's
kind
of
close
to
downtown
it's
fully
within
the
historic
district.
It
is
on
the
edge.
J
It's
certainly
an
emergent
part
of
tampa's
second
attempt
at
transit,
oriented
development,
which
hopefully,
in
some
ways,
echoes
what
the
streetcar
had
nearly
100
years
ago
and
the
effort
that
went
into
designing
this
pd
was
painstaking.
Given
some
of
those
challenges
in
in
crosswinds,
and
we
believe
that
this
is
a
reasonable
land
use
change.
We,
we
aren't
going
from
here
to
city
council
to
the
permit
office
we're
going
to
come
back
here
for
the
certificate
of
appropriateness.
J
We
think
that
the
general
geometry
of
what
we're
proposing
can
be
improved
through
the
certificate
of
appropriateness
process
and
coming
back
to
work
with
you
all.
But
we
we
would
ask
for
your
your
recommendation
of
approval
this
evening
on
the
pd,
rezoning
and
and
also
on
the
right-of-way
vacating,
and
if,
if
matt
or
stall,
have
anything
to
add
and
welcome
that.
But
but
if
not,
we
really
appreciate
all
your
time
talking
through
this
today
and
thanks
again.
D
I
think
maybe
the
alley
component
is
probably
the
easier
thing.
Maybe
unless
you
have
a
point,
anyone
have
a
point
to
discuss
regarding
the
alley
vacating
portion.
F
Yeah,
I
I
hate
to
lose
the
alley
just
because
we
do
have
the
historic
brick
still
there,
but
in
this
particular
parcel.
Unfortunately,
I'm
not
sure
there
is
a
development
that
could
be
done.
It
could
even
utilize
it.
You
know,
I
just
will
see
if
you
have
a
function
correct
so
with
that
said,
I
mean
the
writing
is
kind
of
there.
G
I
concur
with
that,
but
if
we're
going
to
abandon
this
this
alley,
I
think
we
should
make
it
dependent
upon
the
the
developers
to
reuse
the
that
existing
paving
to
the
extent
possible
with
their
new
development.
I
mean
at
least
bringing
forward
a
piece
of
what
used
to
be
there
into
new
development,
regardless
of
how
that
may
be
configured.
D
D
Of
appropriateness
and
show
us
the
plans,
the
hardscape,
the
landscape,
all
of
that,
and
so
there
are
opportunities.
We've
certainly
seen
that
before
this
board
before
and
I
and
I
do
think
requesting
that
there
is
due
consideration
of
existing
historic
context
and
materials
that
be
duly
noted,
as
well
as
respected
and
and
reintegrated
into
the
project
as
much
as
possible.
D
You
know
I
live
in
a.
I
live
in
a
historic
neighborhood,
it's
not
under
the
the
board's
review,
but
I'm
I'm
in
a
neighborhood
with
granite,
curbs
and
they're,
doing
tremendous
amount
of
road
work
and
we're
getting
replaced,
bits
and
pieces
with
white
glaring
white,
concrete
curbs,
it's
just
an
eyesore,
so
I
I
do
think
when
we
have
those
opportunities
and
we're
talking
about
the
gateway
to
a
district
that
has
seen
tremendous
growth
even
before
armature
works
and
all
of
those
other
developers
came
in.
D
D
H
Could
just
interject
just
for
a
minute.
One
of
the
staff
findings
on
your
staff
report
is
that
the
development
team
comply
with
section
22
0.305,
the
transportation
code,
yes
about
the
historic
materials,
the
brick
and
the
granite.
H
D
D
G
C
F
Side,
I
think
you
have
a
granted.
D
Okay,
well,
I
think
we
we
could
definitely
make
a
motion
that
incorporates
some
of
that
thinking
right
all
right.
So
in
terms
of
the
rezoning
component
of
the
project,
anything
that
we
should
consider
discuss
before
emotion
is
brought
forth
now.
D
G
D
I
think
that
commissioner
sutton
kind
of
hit
the
nail
on
the
head
earlier
in
a
comment
question
that
he
to
the
team
that
you
know
it's
it's
in
this
funny.
Little
relationship
position
with
all
this
growth
to
the
west
going
crazy
and
then
all
this
quietness
to
the
east,
which
is
residential
and
kind
of
just
starting
to
move
to
the
south
and
the
west,
and
I
think,
the
the
existing
qualities
of
the
site.
D
D
D
You
know
look
to
that
diagram,
that
large
picture
diagram
of
the
west
versus
the
east
component
of
the
site,
the
city
versus
the
historic
district
entry
piece
as
being
a
way
to
to
move
forward,
with
their
request
being
very
specific
about
any
conditions
that
we
might.
G
F
G
E
I
agree,
I
agree
about
lesser
mass.
I
don't
necessarily
think
we
can
dictate
height
and
all
of
the
setbacks,
but
I
think
in
addition
to
having
a
tall
building
on
this
site,
the
setbacks
and
the
pedestrian
experience
per
se
is
not
consistent
with
the
historic
district.
G
C
D
E
E
E
This
we
are
recommending
or
not
recommending
to
city
council
right
and
that's
all
we
could
do
today.
G
C
H
D
G
Down
the
street
and
take
a
look
at
the
churches
and
the
the
y
and
the
metropolitan
ministry
and
all
the
other
facilities
that
have
been
there
forever
and
ever,
and
they
all
have
some
manner
of
minimal
relationship
to
the
street.
They
don't
have
large
buffer
areas.
They
don't
have
lawns.
They
don't
have
all
a
lot
of
different
things,
so
I
could
see
easily.
G
You
know
a
minimal
relationship,
urban
type
relationship
for
this
development
in
this
location
here
on
florida
and
maybe
wrapping
itself
around
the
corners
for
both
oak,
that
you
know
even
even
on
7th
avenue,
that's
a
very
busy
piece
of
road
there.
So
you
know
this
is
an
element
that
needs
to
be
handled
judiciously,
that
I
would
not
expect
this
to
have
the
same
kind
of
buffers
if
you
will
or
setbacks
that
we
would
normally
expect
in
a
residential
parcel
in
the
heart
of
heights.
G
D
C
H
D
The
ultimate
goal-
and
we
are-
we-
are
in
a-
we-
are
in
a
moment
in
time
where
there's
a
great
hue
and
cry
for
more
of
that
and
they're
also
asking
for
a
reduction
in
parking
spaces,
so
that
reduction
in
parking
spaces
presupposes
that
there
are
less
cars
that
the
people
here
are
going
to
have,
which
means
they
are
leaning
more
towards
using
their
feet
or
other
modes
of
transportation
for
that
last
mile
transport
right.
G
D
D
Right,
so
our
our
opportunity
here
is
that
pd
motion
requests
to
rezone.
We
have
that
opportunity.
It
is
very
clearly
spelled
out
in
the
staff
report
those
elements
that
we
need
to
consider
and
we
have
those
waivers
and
those
waivers
are
tied
to
some
of
those.
So
I
think
as
we
as
we
discussed
this,
we
need
to
be
very
clear
about
if
we
are
going
to
move
forward
with
improving
this
free
zone
tonight.
What
are
the
things
that
we
can
live
with
and
others
we
think,
need
to
be
reconsidered
and
that's
our
goal
here.
D
E
F
F
If
we're
one
block
over
there's
no
jurisdiction
here,
so
they
can
do
whatever
they
want
to
do,
but
on
this
particular
parcel,
given
the
uniqueness
of
it,
the
different
zones
that
are
already
on
the
people,
you
know
the
pieces
of
property
now
we're
trying
to
to
bring
everything
into
one
zoning
as
well
as
create
this
significant
buffer
zone,
as
well
as
a
significant
project.
C
D
D
The
outdoor
dining
component,
if
that
became
a
component
right,
we're
seeing
more
and
more
of
that
right
and
then
also,
even
if
it's
a
retail
establishment
that
might
have
clothing
or
other
goods,
sometimes
they
do
sidewalk
sales,
I
mean
that's
the
great
thing
about
urban
environments
is
that
they
bring
their
goods
out
onto
the
streets.
So
I
think
reconsidering
the
notion
of
how
the
how
the
project
actually
will
exist
in
the
urban
fabric
over
time.
H
Okay,
just
for
your
discussion,
I've
got
your
attention
also,
I
think
just
for
your
consideration
of
perhaps
language
that
would
be
effective
in
dealing
with
some
of
the
concerns
you
have.
You
would
reference
the
bullet,
0.5
under
site
plan,
notes
and
conditions.
H
That's
the
type
of
note
comment
that
I
think
can
be
placed
on
the
site
plan,
not
necessarily
the
dimensional
specification,
that's
up
to
you,
but
it's
the
type
of
envelope
of
effectiveness
that
you
could
have
around
the
perimeter
of
the
project.
With
a
note
of
that
nature,
you
can
extend
that
vertically
too,
if
you'd
like,
so
that
there
can
be
stepping
in
and
out
of
the
building.
H
H
E
Sure
so
what
dennis
is
saying
is
that
we
can
request
the
note
for,
when
this
comes
back
to
us,
that
we
have
the
ability
to
adjust
the
setbacks
on
the
elevations.
So
I
think,
being
really
specific.
On.
D
D
C
E
Yeah
so
for.
E
E
D
D
You
know,
honestly,
I'm
I'm
okay
with
florida
having
more
of
an
urban
feel
to
it
being
a
little
closer
to
the
street
it'll
be
further
back
than
what
is
currently
there
on
the
you
know,
when
you
look
at
salvation
army
and
it's
right
up
on
the
sidewalk,
and
it
honestly
doesn't
care
that
it's
on
florida,
it
closes
itself
off
from
it.
Obviously,
but
when
you
start
to
look
at
oak,
especially,
seventh
has
a
different
persona,
because
seventh
was
a
commercial
kind
of
edge.
D
But
still
there's
some
understanding
there
that
it
begins
to
bleed
into
some
residential
and
now
that
there's
some
new
projects
that
are
going
to
come
online,
it
still
has
a
residential
quality.
But
I
think
when
you
look
at
oka,
when
you
look
at
the
east
street,
I'm
sure
I'm
gonna
get
its
name
right
now:
morgan
those
tend
to
be
more
residential
in
the
name
when
you
start
to
go
through.
D
E
D
F
C
G
Because
if
you
want
to
treat
it
like,
you
know
a
hotel
entrance,
then
you're
going
to
see
something
again
right
down.
You
know
right
there
on
the
curbside
right
on
the
sidewalk
side,
same
thing
for
any
of
the
major
apartment
buildings
that
we've
seen
we've
gone
up
in
town
here
recently,
that's
the
scale!
That's
the
scale
that
we're
inviting
into
into
into
this
scale
and
massing
and
site
plant
site
forming
that
we're
that
we're
inviting
into
this
district
because
there's
an
overlay
zoning
that
would
permit
it.
G
D
D
D
F
C
So
again,
your
her
view
is
to
either
your
purview
is
to
either
recommend
city
council
approve
or
deny
this
rezoning
request,
and
if
there
are
conditions
as
referenced
on
page
or
you
know
or
notes
that
you
want
to
reference.
You
know,
on
page.
5
of
the
staff
report
gives
you
that
guidance
for
that.
If
that
is
what
this
board
so
chooses
to
do,
correct.
F
F
D
G
D
All
in
favor
of
the
motion
please
state
I
and
raise
your
hand
indicating
so
I
all
against
opposing
motion
carries
three
to
one.
Thank
you.
E
C
E
C
H
D
D
D
C
I
P
I
I
This
is
for
the
address
of
409
east
oak
avenue.
This
is
in
the
tampa
heights
historic
district.
Currently
it's
a
vacant
parcel.
This
is,
and
the
underlying
zoning
currently
is
cn
to
give
you
some
information
on
the
front.
End
of
this
cn
allows
for
the
front
to
be
at
20.
I
I
I
Property
in
question
is
highlighted
in
the
green
box.
It
does
face
oak
to
the
west.
You
have
jefferson
to
the
east,
you
have
central
avenue
and
you
have
7th
avenue
to
the
south
this
this
subject
site
does
have
a
tea
alley
as
well.
This
alley
is
to
remain
open,
they
have
a
north
south
alley
and
then
they
have
an
east
west
alley.
I
I
There
is
no
historical
reference
left
on
this
block,
except
for
the
commercial
structure
that
abuts
it
to
the
west
and
there's
one
structure
to
the
north
east.
That's
left
behind.
All
of
this
has
been
gone.
There
is
no
fabric
associated
with
this
block,
except
for
the
two
that
I
mentioned.
There
is
one
new
construction
that
came
probably
2001
2002,
that's
in
this
area.
Here
you
see
the
setback
that
was
here
in
1929
and
you'll,
see
the
setback
that's
established
today,
as
you
use
this
sanborn
as
a
reference.
I
I
would
expand
out
a
little
bit
to
the
west
and
look
at
the
undulation
of
the
structures
that
were
present
in
1929.
Some
are
a
little
closer
to
the
to
the
property
line.
Some
sit
a
little
farther
back
and
that's
to
the
block
to
the
west.
On
the
immediate
block,
you
see
the
fabric.
That's
here.
This
illustration
can
be
used
later
on
to
assist
you
in
as
you
deliberate.
I
I
I
This
is
the
period
structure
very
nice,
one-story,
commercial
building.
You
see
the
setback,
the
commercial
buildings
that
anchor
the
corner
are
usually
a
zero
zero
setback.
As
this
one
indicates,
this
is
looking
at
oak
in
both
directions.
This
is
looking
to
the
east
and
turning
around
to
the
west.
This
is
across
jefferson
here.
This
is
that
new
construction
that
I
spoke
about.
I
I
Q
Thank
you,
commissioners,
for
your
time
this
evening
my
name
is
adam
wolf.
I
represent
wolf
partners.
We
are
the
architect
and
developer.
My
partner
josh
is
here
representing
us
as
well.
We
also
have
our
certified
arborist
ricky
pedrica
present,
and
we
have
our
historic
preservation
consultant.
Stephanie
farrell
is
here
here,
along
with
clayton
brickemaire,
who
is
our
landing's
attorney.
Q
C
Q
G
Q
So
here
you
see,
the
subject
parcel
is
on
the
south
southern
end
of
the
historic
district
directly
adjacent,
as
ron
said
to
the
contributing
structure
of
the
commercial
building,
and
it's
currently
zoned
commercial
neighborhood
and
when
considered
for
a
single-family
attached
use
for
table,
4-2,
footnote,
17
and
4-2.1
note
2
of
the
tampa
band
development
code.
It
refers
to
the
tampa
comprehensive
plan
to
establish
the
maximum
density
or
chloride
ratios.
Q
It
also
outlines
the
building,
facades
and
entrances
that
directly
address
the
street
should
have
a
high
degree
of
transparency
on
street
fronting
facades.
We've
outlined
our
glazing
and
transparency,
as
it
addresses
oak
and
also
in
the
r83
land
use
category.
It
stipulates
that
medium
density
building
should
be
three
to
eight
stories
and
high
density.
Four
to
twenty
four,
we
are
proposing
two
three-story
buildings.
Q
The
vertical
and
horizontal
integration
of
complementary
non-residential
uses
if
we
look
at
the
surrounding
parcels,
directly
adjacent
to
our
site,
there's
quite
a
mixture
of
uses
with
commercial,
single-family
and
multi-family,
whether
proposed
or
existing,
and
I
think
this
really
is
kind
of
a
microcosm
of
what
the
greater
tampa
heights
historic
neighborhood
is
typifies
a
lot
of
mixed
use,
mixed
uses
of
buildings
adjacent
to
single
family,
to
commercial
buildings,
and
I
think
that's
what
makes
the
fabric
of
tampa
heights
special
and
we
look
to
add
to
that
rather
than
take
away.
Q
Q
Our
parcel
is
confronted
by
an
alley
on
the
east
and
the
south,
and
that's
one
of
the
things
that
attracted
us
to
this
is
that
we
were
able
to
build
something
without
having
to
create
curb
cuts
or
any
kind
of
additional
spices
through
the
site,
but
rather
utilize
the
alleys
for
reference.
The
alley
on
the
east
is
currently
unimproved.
Our
plan
is
to
improve
that
to
tampa
city
standards
and
the
alley
to
the
south
is
partially
improved
about
halfway
to
the
east
on
our
site,
we'll
plan
to
improve
that
as
well.
Q
I
just
wanted
to
call
out
the
two
waivers
that
would
be
required
for
this.
This
project,
section
27-282.10,
is
to
our
units
six
seven
eight
and
nine
front
entry
to
face
in
an
internal
courtyard,
rather
than
directly
abutting
the
street
and
section
27-284.4
section
d,
to
request
to
pay
into
the
applicable
planning
district
trees,
trust
fund
for
mitigation
trees
that
cannot
be
planted
on
site.
P
Q
Tamper
height
design
criteria,
there
are
11
criteria,
but
I
think
that
for
this
consideration
on
this
rezone,
the
first
five
are
really
applicable.
The
other
ones
have
to
do
with
materiality
and
architectural
details
that
are
more
appropriate
for
the
ca
assignment
number
one
is
scale
height
and
width,
the
proportions
and
size
of
the
new
building,
compared
with
other
contributory
buildings
within
the
historic
district.
Q
Again,
these
these
precedents,
I
think,
will
establish
our
relationship
to
those
setback,
maintaining
the
regular
building
setback,
which
occurs
on
the
block.
Now
we
only
have
one
structure
that
is
existing
on
the
block
and
it
is
contributing
and
we
are
trying
to
propose
a
setback
that
will
be
in
keeping
with
the
current
established
setback
on
the
block,
orientation
and
site
coverage,
the
front
of
the
new
building
relationship
to
the
front
of
other
buildings.
Q
So,
in
relationship
to
our
parcel
down
here
in
the
south
end,
we've
identified
the
following
historic
cycling:
precedents.
All
of
them
are
contributing
structures.
Many
of
them
are
of
the
same
use
in
terms
of
multi-family
or
adjacent
to
commercial
properties,
and
we
also
have
identified
the
vehicular
use
area
and
the
front
entrances
on
all
of
these
precedents.
Q
Q
As
as
far
as
we
can
tell
it
looks
like
row
houses
on
the
on
the
site,
and
it's
of
you
can
see
as
you
look
at
the
sanborn
map,
that's
similar
in
massive
form
to
what
we're
proposing
and
it's
also
mixed
in
with
a
bunch
of
single
families
and
looks
like
duplexes
as
well.
Q
Q
Another
two
contributing
structures
and
one
recently
approved
townhouse
development,
the
building
to
the
furthest
to
the
north
on
the
corner
of
francis
and
central.
Just
a
few
blocks.
North
of
us
is
a
single-story
commercial
building,
similar
to
what
we're
proposing
directly
adjacent
is
a
multi-family
structure
and
then
three
more
multi-family
townhouses
with
motor
cores
in
the
rear.
Q
I
think
it's
of
note
is
the
here
also
the
way
that
the
pedestrian
level
is
engaged
with
at
the
stoops
on
the
multi-family
building.
That's
directly
adjacent
to
this
commercial,
and
I
think,
that's
a
really
inviting
way
to
to
engage
with
pedestrian
level,
and
I
think
we're
going
to
try
to
exemplify
that
in
our
proposed
development
as
well.
Q
Here
we
have
304
east
ross
street.
There
is
a
carriage
house
that
is
full
lot
coverage
on
the
east
side.
It's
got
vehicular
access
in
between
the
the
multi-family
building
on
the
west.
It's
also
note
that
this
is
while
it's
full
lot
coverage.
It
also
is
directly
adjacent
to
a
pocket
park,
which
I
think
is
something
that
we
should
strive
as
as
city
planners
and
developers
to
incorporate.
If
we're
going
to
do
a
denser
site
coverage
that
it's
adjacent
to
a
pocket
park,
amenity.
Q
And
then
probably
most
relevant
is
the
30tv
7th
avenue,
which
was
just
recently
approved,
it's
relative
in
terms
of
scale
and
massing
setbacks,
orientation
and
rhythm,
basically,
everything
that
we're
trying
to
propose
here.
However,
there
are
some
differences
we
have.
We
have
taken
great
care
to
try
to
eliminate
as
many
waivers
as
possible,
so
incorporating
the
amount
of
green
space.
Q
Q
Q
One
of
the
things
that
that
cited,
our
buildings
was
the
alignment
and
rhythm
of
spacing
of
the
commercial
property
to
the
west
and
how
we've
oriented
our
front
doors
to
directly
engage
with
the
sidewalk.
Q
We
do
meet
all
the
green
space
requirements,
we're
proposing
some
pervious
pavers
here
in
this
center
motor
court,
which
does
not
count
towards
that
green
space
requirement.
But
we
think
it's
a
nice
amenity
to
to
increase
the
stormwater
management
on
the
site
and
we
meet
all
the
parking
requirements.
Q
And
I'm
going
to
run
through
the
the
conditions
that
are
set
forth
in
the
staff
report
to
make
sure
that
we
satisfy
all
the
conditions
that
were
discussed.
We
have
a
underground
storage
vault
here
in
that
center
motor
core
for
storm
water
management
and,
as
you
can
see,
all
of
the
refuse
and
solid
waste
storage
vessels
are
going
to
be
inside
of
the
garages
with
pickup
planned
along
oak
avenue.
Q
Q
Q
As
far
as
the
rhythm
and
spacing
that
I
referenced
earlier,
we
did
a
diagram
of
the
existing
access
points
along
that
commercial
building
and
have
cited
that
building
on
the
north
side
of
our
site
to
be
in
keeping
with
that
spacing,
I
think
if
it
was
further
to
the
west,
it
would
disrupt
that
pattern.
That's
already
existing
along
the
block
and
or
if
the
front
entrances
were
on
the
opposite
side
of
each
unit.
I
think
that
would
also
be
not
in
keeping
with
the
characteristic
that
has
been
already
established.
Q
Q
Here
you
can
see
the
three
typical
elevations
along
the
front
facade
of
oak
and
how
the
the
setbacks
vary
and
differ
so
that
we
can
get
that
breaking
up
of
what
would
otherwise
be
a
continuous
extrusion.
We've
tried
to
use
the
architecture
to
break
down
the
mass
and
scale
as
it
relates
to
surrounding
buildings
in
the
neighborhood.
Q
You
can
see
the
location
of
the
mechanical
equipment
essentially
located,
so
they
won't
be
visible
from
the
pedestrian
level.
We
also
have
our
type
1
shade
trees
planned
to
be
planted
in
there
right
away.
We
have
six
southern
magnolias
and
we
also
have
type
2
eagles
and
holly
and
crepe
myrtles
in
the
buffer
area
between
us
and
the
adjacent
commercial
property
and
then
also
along
the
alley
to
the
east.
Q
And,
as
I
conclude
the
presentation,
I
want
to
leave
it
with
this.
I
know
that
a
lot
of
this
is
going
to
be
more
relevant
for
the
certificate
of
appropriateness,
but
I
think
this
shows
the
design
intent
of
how
we
plan
to
engage
with
that
pedestrian
level
experience
and
create
what
you
know
really
is
nice
about
tampa
heights
is
the
stoops
and
the
front
porches,
and
the
way
that
that
engages
directly
with
the
public
and
really
it
creates
an
inviting
and
walkable
neighborhood.
I
I
Your
duties
are
as
follows:
in
chapter
27,
section
27
113
your
duties
and
powers
under
a2j.
Your
specific
authority
is
with
regards
to
the
application
for
rezoning
changes
to
lane,
use
classifications
or
comprehensive
plan
amendments
to
review
and
recommend
reasonable
lane
changes
and
use
changes
to
the
extent
necessary
to
preserve
the
historic
integrity
and
appearance
staff.
I
C
I
Further,
the
discussion
is
to
provide
the
different
dimensions
from
the
property
line
to
the
different
facades
on
the
front
there.
There
is
some
some
setback
and
of
the
front
facade
to
show
those
dimensions
from
the
pipeline
and
show
how
he
was
trying
to
break
the
massing
final,
a
storm
water
solution.
I
Also
on
the
pd's
we're
getting
consistent
on
adding
a
note
to
the
site
plan
that
authorizes
the
architecture
review,
commission
the
ability
to
adjust
the
dimensional
setbacks
that
build
to
line
we
put
down
here,
five
foot.
If
you
want
to
increase
that
to
10
foot,
I
think
that
that's
in
a
reasonable
request.
I
We
have
them
take
another
look
at
the
front
yard
setbacks
and
the
introduction
from
from
the
pedestrian
experience
to
the
the
approach
to
to
go
inside
the
house,
either
for
a
stoop
and
or
porches
he
did
touch
upon.
They
introduced
additional
porches,
but
I
think
more
information
can
be
addressed
at
the
public
hearing
tonight.
D
C
I,
sir,
can
you
say
your
first
name
again,
martin.
R
Hernandez:
okay,
east,
okay,
402
the
ron
mentioned
the
building,
the
new
structure
on
the
corner
of
oak
and
jefferson.
That's
the
building
that
I
developed
and
owned.
It's
a
building
that
I
went
through.
The
afc
did
all
the
the
things
that
I
felt
were
were
required
in
order
for
my
building
to
be
compatible
with
the
neighborhood.
It's
a
it's
a
two-story
building.
The
second
floor
is
actually
smaller
than
the
than
the
first
floor,
and
I
wish
we
had
pictures
of
it,
but
it
in
my
mind.
It
does
fit
well
into
the
neighborhood.
R
What
I
what
I
see,
the
problem
that
I
have
with
this
project
is
that
it's
a
massive
project
in
comparison
to
the
other
buildings
that
are
that
are
there.
It's
a
lot
of
units
are
being
squeezed
into
a
small
lot.
R
There's
two
buildings:
road
row
house
type
buildings,
the
second
building
sits
in
the
back
of
the
first,
the
one
that's
facing
oak,
that
building
has
doors
that
are
facing
an
alley
or
a
driveway.
I
think
in
the
guidelines.
It
asks
for
all
the
doors
to
face
the
the
street
and
that
adds
into
that
environment
of
the
walking
neighborhood
there.
It
costs
for
porches
I'm
not
sure
that
what
qualifies
as
a
porch.
R
And
I'm
not
sure
what
they're,
what
they're
planning?
Also
the
the
it
calls
for
race
floor
to
give
you
that
that
feeling
of
you
know
the
the
historic
value
of
the
property
of
the
neighborhood
in
general.
You
know,
I,
I
see
this
project
as
being
able
to
fit
just
about
anywhere
except
tampa
heights.
The
architecture
doesn't
seem
to
be
fitting
with
with
the
neighborhood
it's
it's
massive,
I'm
not
sure
that
the
the
the
the
the
massing
of
the
of
the
volumes
are
there.
R
I
think
it's
yeah.
There
is
a
a
variation
of
a
couple
of
feet
forward
and
backwards
in
the
front
elevation,
but
there
is
in
the
massing
that
I
would
that
I
would
see
where
you
have
tall
areas
of
the
buildings
and
lower
areas
of
the
building
and
perhaps
different
different
roof
slopes.
This
is
this
is
not
something
that
belongs
in
tampa
heights.
R
I
think
approving
a
project
like
this
one
is
going
to
open
the
door
for
a
lot
more
of
these
projects
to
to
come
to
the
neighborhood,
and
I
think
that's
going
to
destroy
the
fabric
of
the
neighborhood.
I
don't
think
this
is.
This
is
something
that
that
is
conducive
to
promote
the
historic
character
of
the
neighborhood,
and
I
I'm
against
it
and
thank
you.
B
Justin
rickey
103
east
26th
avenue,
I'm
the
vice
president
of
tampa
heights,
civic
association.
I
am
speaking
in
official
capacity
now
I'm
going
to
read
a
letter
now
that
our
executive
board
crafted
for
this
evening
in
support
of
this
project.
Tampa
heights.
Civic
association
supports
rezoning
of
21-82
of
the
property
at
409
east
oak
avenue
per
the
current
site
plan.
The
applicant
met
with
our
organization
multiple
times
during
the
course
of
the
year,
and
made
adjustments
to
transportation
parking
street
engagement
and
green
space
based
on
thca
feedback.
B
We
acknowledge
that
some
of
the
surrounding
property
owners
opposed
and
some
are
in
favor
of
the
this
rezoning.
The
executive
board
carefully
considered
those
positions
and
the
facts
of
the
application.
During
our
deliberation
vote,
this
letter
of
support
pertains
to
the
rezoning.
Only
not
the
certificate
of
appropriateness
thca
will
address
that
separately
at
a
later
date.
Thank
you
very
much
template
civic
association.
Thank.
R
Yes,
ma'am,
I
am
speaking
against
this
project,
as
the
gentleman
before
me
did
illicit
it's
a
huge
project
for
that
piece
of
land.
R
There
are
several
concerns
we
own
the
property
in
their
backyard
to
on
seventh
avenue.
The
alley
that
they
are
talking
about,
that
is
to
the
east
of
the
property
and
to
the
south
of
the
property,
cannot
bear.
R
R
R
A
I
extensively
renovated
two
historic
properties
in
the
tampa
heights
office
village,
and
my
parents
did
one
for
the
past
20
years
we
have
all
had
to
comply
with
the
historic
guidelines
and
the
neighborhood
has
been
better
for
it.
My
brothers
and
I
owned
the
1925
one-story
commercial
building
next
door
to
this
site,
I'm
not
opposed
to
town
homes,
but
I
am
opposed
to
elements
of
this
particular
project
for
a
number
of
reasons.
A
Personally,
I'm
very
concerned
about
flooding.
This
project
is
80
percent
impermeable
and
that
assumes
that
the
driveway
will
remain
permeable.
After
years
of
cars,
compacting
the
material,
our
historic
building
and
all
entrances
sit
at
grade
or
just
inches
above
it
does
not
flood
now,
but
considering
the
unprecedented
flooding
throughout
the
states
this
past
year.
I
have
grave
concerns
that,
should
their
property
not
absorb
their
runoff,
the
effect
on
our
building
would
be
disastrous
and
there
goes
another
historic
building.
A
The
developer
is
removing
all
19
trees
on
their
property.
We
have
two
mature
co2,
absorbing
temperature
lowering
shade
trees,
which
sit
very
close
to
the
property
line.
We
would
like
a
guarantee
that
their
construction
would
not
harm
or
kill
these
two
trees
and,
as
a
note,
a
young
tree
takes
decades
to
absorb
the
same
amount
of
co2
as
a
mature
tree,
and
a
few
crepe
myrtles
will
never
come
close
to
providing
the
same
benefit.
A
This
three-story
long,
double
bunker
architectural
style
is
not
compatible
with
the
existing
character
of
the
neighborhood,
does
not
adhere
to
the
historic
guidelines
and
does
not
fit
with
the
rhythm
of
the
street
or
into
this
neighborhood.
The
massing
form
and
scale
are
huge,
especially
in
relation
to
the
adjacent
building.
A
It's
considerably
taller
than
any
of
the
surrounding
buildings,
and
the
fact
that
they're
only
four
feet
from
the
street
makes
it
even
more
overwhelming
historic
guidelines
state
the
entrance
is
to
face
the
street.
As
you
know,
the
whole
second
row
faces
the
garages
of
the
first
row
and
I
don't
see
how
you
can
call
the
driveway
a
courtyard.
A
A
There
will
be
a
parking
shortage,
I'm
confused
as
to
why
this
style
and
form
would
be
considered
acceptable
here
if
it's
truly
conforming,
it
should
conform
without
waivers,
especially
setback
waivers
and
tampa
heights
is
more
aligned
with
hyde
park
than
channel
side
or
ebor.
If
you
think
that
this
project
wouldn't
fly
in
hyde
park,
then
it
shouldn't
fly
in
tampa
heights.
A
L
L
Thank
you
good
evening
again
of
ricky
pederica,
dark,
moss,
308,
east
7th
avenue,
approximately
300
feet
from
this
site,
one
block
or
a
half
a
block
south
and
a
few
blocks
over.
L
Thank
you.
This
is
the
subject
property
here,
409
east
oak.
This
is
my
property
308
east
7th
avenue.
This
is
7th
avenue
here
oak
there.
This
is
the
property.
We
just
heard
the
loki
capital-
and
this
is
the
is
302
east
7th
that
was
heard
a
few
months
ago.
The
four-story
victorian
that
I
was
present
for
had
concerns
about
fences
but
otherwise
welcomed
the
project
welcomed
this
project.
L
I
feel
that
both
are
compatible
with
the
combined
goals
of
the
guidelines
and
the
proximity
to
downtown.
This
is
the
edge
of
the
district,
and
I
certainly
prefer
the
both
developments
over
the
vacant
properties
that
they
are
now
and
that
I
appreciate
your
consideration
as
a
neighboring
stakeholder.
Thank
you.
D
F
N
Q
If
proposing
per
table
4-2.1
footnote
2.
If
memory
serves.
Q
4-2,
footnote
17
4.2.1,
footnote
2
of
the
tampa
land
development
code,
particularly
pertaining
to
a
single-family
attached
use
within
the
commercial
neighborhood
district.
It
defers
you
to
the
tampa
comprehensive
plan
for
the
maximum
density,
which
we
find
is
75
dwelling
units
an
acre.
We
have
0.37
acres,
which
equates
to
27
dwelling
units
allowable
by
right
with
the
existing
zoning
and
we're
proposing
9.
Q
Yeah
well,
we
are
handling
all
of
our
storm
water
retention
on
site
and
I
believe
the
future
developments
would
use
that
same
methodology.
You
would
not
find
any
added
stormwater
issues
compared
to
what's
already
there.
I
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
impervious
on
some
adjacent
sites,
we've
added
the
additional
underground
storage
of
that
stormwater
detention
vault
as
an
extra
measure
to
ensure
that
we
do
not
negatively
impact
the
sites
adjacent
to
us,
along
with
the
pervious
paper
system,
which
is
not
necessarily
calculated
in
any
stormwater
calcs.
Q
Q
D
Q
L
Thank
you,
commissioners,
ricky
pedricka,
dark,
moss,
3087th
avenue.
Let's
see
how
quickly
I
can
get
through
this.
There
are
both
on-site
and
off-site
there's
approximately
26
trees
on
the
property
to
aid.
In
interpreting
this
this
graphic,
the
green
dots
mean
that
they're
good
trees,
brown
dots
mean
that
they're
poor
trees
and
x's
mean
that
they're
being
removed.
L
And
they're
the
off-site
trees
that
have
been
discussed
or
are
located
here
and
here
and
there's
also
it's
two
off-site
trees
on
the
south.
L
It's
being
discussed
with
staff,
currently
this
this
tree
here
how
to
negotiate
the
alley
pavement
width
in
order
to
preserve
this
tree.
So
this
is
the
document
that
was
submitted
in
september.
It
has
been
it's
still
in
flux,
but
likely
this
tree
will
be
preserved.
D
L
L
That
good,
okay,
good
question:
yes,
okay,
let's
get
to
that
tree
table
that
we
need
to
replace.
We
are
removing
six
type
ones,
one
six
large
and
wide
trees.
I
apologize
is
that
small,
but
I
I'm
sorry,
eight,
no,
six,
six
large
and
white
trees,
no
tall
and
narrow
trees,
one
small
and
wide
tree
and
12
palms.
D
Q
We
have
six
type
one
trees
in
the
right
of
way
and
lead
eight
in
total
type,
true
type,
two
in
the
buffer
zone
between
the
adjacent
parcel
in
the
west.
D
L
L
Let's
say
of
the
type
ones
we're
proposing:
six
17
are
required
and
the
pink
trees,
let's
see
if,
if
you
could
pull
up
the
the
landscape.
L
The
blue
trees
we'd
have
a
remain.
We
have
17
replacements
required,
proposing
six
have
a
remainder
of
11.,
the
pink
trees
or
magenta
trees.
We
have
a
deficit
of
one
offset
by
a
proposed
eight.
The
code
allows
a
swap
of,
I
think
three
type,
three
trees
per
one
type
one,
so
they
can
kind
of
eat
away
at
each
other.
But
there's
a
I
don't
know
I
50
40
percent
that
are
being
planted
back
in
lou
or
planted
back
on
site.
L
L
But
the
ability
to
plant
on
site
is
slightly
restricted
by
the
preservation
of
the
canopies
of
offsite
trees,
so
where
it's
you
can
on
the
southwest,
where
the
off-site
camphor
is
sort
of
shown
in
the
parking
lot
and
kind
of
is
in
the
parking
lot.
That
canopy
extends
almost
all
the
way
across
to
the
southwest
unit.
D
D
D
D
Q
Q
D
C
Q
So
moving
left
to
right
in
condition
a
we
have
a
planter.
That's
set
three
foot
three
off
of
the
property
line,
condition
b
here
with
the
porches
it's
the
base
of
that
porch
is
at
one
foot,
three
off
the
property
line
with
small
plantings
below
again,
the
nearest
enclosure
element
is
at
six
foot
three
off
the
property
line
and
at
the
door
condition
six
foot
three
as
well.
D
Great
we'll
go
ahead
and
I.
E
Do
have
one
question
right:
she
has
one
request:
if
the
units
7
8,
6,
7,
8
9,
were
to
face
the
south
would
how
did
that
affect
your
waiver
requests
and
overall
design?
So.
Q
I
want
to
point
out,
in
the
type
of
heist
design
guidelines
page
49
speaking
about
what
is
permissible
in
terms
of
having
the
primary
entrances
face,
the
street
and
not
otherwise.
It
does
say
it
is
permissible
to
provide
primary
entrances
on
the
street
facade,
which
we've
done.
Q
It
also
says
it's
not
permissible
to
provide
primary
interest
entrances
on
non-street
facades.
If
no
primary
entrance
exists
on
street
facades,
which,
by
a
rule
of
a
double
negative
sorts
of
sorts,
seems
like
it
would
be
preferable
to
have
that
we
do
have
primary
entrances
directly.
On
oak
we've
situated
the
secondary
entrances
to
the
as
much
facing
oak
as
possible.
Out
of
all
the
three
elevations
that
clearly
is
primarily
facing
oak,
rather
than
turning
its
back
on
and
facing
an
alley
which,
I
think
is
probably,
in
my
opinion,
a
bad
design
principle.
C
Good
excuse
me
kamari
pettis,
mackel
from
the
city
attorney's
office.
Is
there
a
is
there
a
pending?
Do
you
have
a
special
use
pending
associated
with
this
request.
F
Q
C
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
What
we're
proposing
is
roughly
8
500
square
feet
in
terms
of
site
coverage,
the
other
historical
precedence
that
we've
shown,
I
think,
establishes
the
the
scale
and
the
bulk
and
how
that's
pretty
pretty
common
in
tampa
heights
to
have
larger
multi-family
buildings
adjacent
to
single
family
and
commercial
uses,
and
then
I'll
close
with
our
height
proposal
is
35
feet,
which
is
under
the
commercial
at
the
limit
and
we're
not
asking
for
any
waivers
or
increases
in
that
allowable
height.
D
G
I
have
no
major
complaint
right
now
that
I
do
wish
to
bring
up
one
particular
point
referenced
before
us
was
a
a
another
double-barrelled
townhouse
project
that
this
board
had
approved
some
months
ago.
We
have
another
one
here
and
at
that
previous
one,
I
believe
I
made
a
point
where
this
would
be
a
dangerous
precedent.
G
D
D
I
I
personally
don't
have
issues
with
with
this
product,
and
I
know
that
we
we
did
approve
the
prior
one
in
terms
of
its
relationship
to
the
site
and
to
the
frontage
and
that
the
primary
faces.
Oh,
I
think
that's
the
right
move.
You
don't
want
primary
off
an
alley.
I
honestly
that's
not
historically
correct
what
I
do
have
issue
with,
and
I
know
that
you
know
if
this
moves
forward.
D
D
How
it
breaks
that
that
down
because
right
now
the
roof
lines
read
as
one
massive
roofline
there's
not
enough
and
that's
something
that
we'd
have
to
consider.
But
I
do
think
that
there's
a
massing
issue
that
we'll
have
to
contend
with,
and
I
I
do
think
that
the
discussion
of
the
setbacks,
especially
along
oak-
that's
probably
the
most
significant
consideration
for
this.
F
The
square
footages
may
be
the
same,
but
the
setbacks
are
very,
very
different,
great
reminder.
So
the
setbacks
is
what
is
the
big
difference?
Yeah,
and
I
recall
that
other
project
for
me
personally,
there
must
have
been
something
very
different
or
I
would
have
been
against
what
was
going
on
there
as
well.
D
F
D
Right,
I
think
they
had
to
continue
or
something-
and
we
had
a
lot
of
discussion
about
that
and
they
moved
their
building
back
from
the
primary
to
allow
for
more
that-
and
I
think
you
know,
they've
allowed
for
a
notation
of
five
feet
that
you
know
adjust
all
dimensional
setbacks
up
to
five
feet.
Is
that
five
feet
from
the
existing
setbacks
that
they're
showing
on
their
plan?
Now?
C
E
I
agree:
I
actually
think
that
the
the
overall
setback
is
much
more
relevant
in
this
project.
I
think
it's
just
the
mass
of
what
we're
seeing
right
up
against
the
sidewalk,
so
I
think
that
that's
a
lot
of
rhythm
and
breaking
up
massing,
as
opposed
to
like
a
general
setback
issue.
F
D
E
C
D
D
E
C
C
D
E
K
D
G
C
E
E
And
that
elevations,
our
elevations
provided,
are
not
endorsed
by
means
of
this
recommendation,
staff
believes
that
significant
changes
to
the
architectural
characteristics,
what
that's
okay,
keep
going
of
the
design
must
occur
for
the
architectural
elements
of
the
project
to
be
determined
compatible
with
the
tampa
heights
design
guidelines,
the
current
elevations
and
renderings
are
for
visioning
purposes.
Only
and
final
design
parameters
will
be
subject
to
the
certificate
of
appropriateness
review
process.
I
I
The
request
in
front
of
you
this
evening
is
new
construction.
It's
a
primary
structure
with
site
improvements.
There
is
no
accessory
structure
attached
to
this
request.
Moving
to
the
vicinity
map
property
in
question
faces
gladys
to
the
west.
You
have
jefferson
to
the
east.
You
have
central,
you
have
your
your
primary
street.
There
is
no
alleys
associated
with
this
and
it's
a
truncated
lot
that
the
dimensions
will
show
up
on
the
site
planned
through
the
presentation.
I
This
is
showing
the
sanborn
map
on
the
top.
Once
again,
you
have
central
avenue,
you
have
gladys
and
you
have
jefferson.
This
illustrates
there
was
never
a
a
an
alley
associated
with
this
project.
Property
in
question
is:
in
the
green.
There
was
some
reference
structures
associated
in
the
immediate
vicinity
through
the
presentation
this
evening.
You'll
see
that
there's
two
two
buddies
of
reference
that
you
could
get
for
elevation
from
grade
and
for
front
yard
setbacks
as
a
president
for
to
establish
on
that
street.
I
I
I
And
just
a
couple
street
shots
looking
down
gladys,
this
is
to
the
west
and
to
conclude
with
the
east
this
time
the
agent
can
come
forward
and
address
the
board.
M
M
How
you
doing
I'm
rendell
randolph
my
address
is
4701
east
hanna
avenue
of
tampa
florida
tonight,
maybe
not
as
prepared
as
the
move
that
came
before
me.
This
was
a
little
bit
overwhelming,
but
I
do
have
some
things
to
be
able
to
to
add
and
to
be
able
to
share
that
this
project
might
be
feasible
to
the
tampa
heights.
M
District
has
already
stated
it's
an
empty
lot
currently
and
we
are
proposing
to
put
a
single
story
structure
there.
Approximately.
M
M
All
right
so
north
is
up,
as
you
can
see,
the
arrows
go
out
of
the
street
and
in
doing
so
just
looking
at
the
site
playing
in
itself.
It's
meeting
the
criterias
as
far
as
the
setbacks
that
are
allowed
in
tampa
heights
to
your
your
east
you'll
see
that
it's
a
seven
foot
setback
or
side
set
and
to
the
I'm
sorry
my
phone
died
for
me
to
be
able
to
blow
it
up
myself
while
sitting
here.
But
we
do
need
the
the
setbacks
from
the
side
and
rear.
M
We
did
the
ribbon
driveway,
which
is
three
feet:
ribbon
driveway
three
feet
three
feet
and
three
feet:
it's
36
foot
long
on
that
adjacent
to
the
side
of
the
the
building
to
allow
for
two
cars
spacing.
M
M
It
was
spoken
earlier
about
the
setbacks
in
the
front,
we're
matching
the
the
setback
to
the
neighbor
on
the
east
side,
which
is
nine
feet.
So
it's
nine
foot
to
the
front
of
the
porch.
We
have
a
seven
foot
porch
that
also
matches
the
the
the
structure
next
to
it,
as
well
as
seven
foot
porch.
M
And
and
rick
also
mentioned
our
staff
member
also
mentioned
the
riser
heights
or
the
risers.
What
we
did
is
try
to
come
as
close
as
we
possibly
can
to
making
sure
that
that
elevation
kind
of
matched
what
was
next
door
and
to
making
sure-
and
that
is
the
only
house
on
that
on
that
block-
that
is
historical,
and
so
I
do
have
a
picture
of
how
their
steps
look.
If
that's
something
that
you'd
like
to
see.
M
And
again,
that's
I
think
that
I
think
they
have
one
two
three
four.
M
Six
six
risers
and
that
in
itself
and
all
of
them
being
in
different
sizes
and
when
visiting
the
location,
but
nonetheless
is
a
little
higher
than
we
could
probably
match.
Seeing
that
that's
probably
about
43
inches.
M
Some
of
the
things
that
were
in
question
and
and
before
coming
here
is
to
make
sure
that
we
had
a
design
that
matched,
and
so
we've
added
the
coral
that
we're
in
question
and
also
as
well
as
the
brake
veneer
that
we'll
be
placing
on
the
columns
and
around
the
exterior
of
the
home.
All
the
hardy
siding
matches
the
the
design
also
with
cladded
windows,
that
hard
decided.
I
think
it's
seven
and
a
quarter
siding
and
we
have
four
inch
trim
going
around
matching
it
all
around.
The
exterior
of
the
home.
M
Another
portion
that
was
in
question
was
the
the
rear
elevation
or
the
south
elevation,
in
which
we've
added
a
band
and
also
the
the
shaped
siding
to
give
it
a
different
look
and
to
not
allow
it
to
run
all
together
at
once.
M
M
I
think
one
of
the
questions
that
we
needed
to
meet
or
address
as
well
with
the
the
rear
door
on
it
being
recessed
in
still
allows
for
it
to
meet
the
qualifications
that
have
been
added
for
us.
M
As
you
can
see,
the
typical
wall
detail
that
you
can
find
here,
it
does
again
match
with
acts
of
us
with
the
24
inch
overhang
that
is
required.
We
are
using
a
shingle
as
far
as
the
roof
cladded.
C
M
M
Some
of
the
things
that
were
act
that
we
would
be
able
to
supply
some
of
the
kind
of
going
backwards
a
little
bit
with
some
of
the
hardware.
M
So
this
is
the
hardware
as
far
as
the
lighting
that
we
wanted
to
to
be
able
to
place,
and
it
was
only
expected
to
be
at
one
area
of
this
particular
house
and
that's
in
that
side.
M
M
So
I
believe
that
I've
answered
different
questions
that
were
asked
of
me
and,
most
being
the
materials
that
were
needed.
In
my
conditions,
my
plans
have
matched
the
drawings
that
would
include
a
one
inch
to
ten
foot
scale,
an
elevation,
a
quarter
inch
to
one
foot
scale
and
in
those
different
sections.
So
I
believe
that
being
stated
that
I
I'm
hopeful
that
I
presented
well
enough
to
be
able
to
get
a
yes
without
us
being
able
to
be
held
here
any
longer
tonight.
M
It
was
getting
a
little
late
and
I
hope
I
didn't
bore
you
or
hold
you
for
too
long
with
my
black
and
whites,
but
that
kind
of
couldn't
include
my
presentation.
If
you
have
any
other
questions.
I
We
reviewed
the
project
on
october
15th
and
then
this
gentleman
came
into
the
office
and
we
went
through
some
of
the
details
so
under
conditions
he
did
show
the
the
one
historic
house,
that's
on
the
same
side
of
the
street
of
his
the
setback
was
expressed,
and
I
have
the
pictures.
If
you
want
to
to
go
back
to
that
and
then
the
elevation
from
grade
he
he
spoke
upon
the
rafter
tails.
The
interior
tails
will
wait
two
by
six
and
the
barge
rafters
will
be
two
by
eights.
I
The
the
initial
design
was
lacking
some
corbels.
He
just
had
the
corbels
on
the
center.
At
the
peak
of
the
roof,
he
incorporated
additional
gables
to
be
more
period
appropriate
to
the
style
house
that
he
provided.
He
did
wrap
all
the
appears
in
the
face,
brick
that
was
presented
and
the
foundation
enclosure
as
well.
The
the
columns
were
lacking
some
details
that
additional
details
were
expressed
this
evening.
I
The
back
elevation
did
have
did
not
have
any
break
from
from
the
from
the
foundation
all
the
way
to
the
ridge.
He
incorporated
a
band
board
and
put
some
shake
shingles
in
there
to
break
the
masking
in
the
back
to
be
consistent
with
the
front
elevation.
I
I
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate:
there
was
no
accessory
structure
associated
with
this.
The
depth
of
the
lot,
I
believe,
is
80
foot
deep
with
it
with
the
dimension
of
the
primary
structure,
there's
no
room
for
the
accessory
structure,
so
he
showed
the
parking
on
the
side
that
meets
city
of
tampa
parking
requirements,
meets
preservations
parking
requirements
on
the
site,
I'll
be
here
to
answer
any
questions.
D
Thank
you
ron.
Now
is
the
public
comment
period
if
there's
anyone
which
I
don't
think
we
have
so
we'll,
go
ahead
and
close
that
and
we
will
begin
asking
questions.
E
A
couple
of
questions
your
drive
apron
has
got
like
a
little
kind
of
a
asymmetry
going
on.
Is
there
any
way
for
you
to
achieve
a
symmetrical
apron
at
the
end
of
your
driveway,
where
it
meets
the
road?
Well,.
M
M
E
E
Okay,
in
that
case
the
you
have
steps
that
lead
out
of
your
front
porch
and
then
a
little
sidewalk
in
front
of
that.
How?
Where
will
that
terminate.
G
Sir,
I
have
a
question
regarding
the
site
plan
as
well,
and
please
correct
me
if
I
reading
it
improperly
and
I
do
not
see
an
indication
of
any
fence
or
gate
work,
is
that
correct?
Yes,
thank
you,
sir.
D
C
M
M
F
M
Well,
one
of
my
reasons
in
the
windows
and
choosing
those
is
because
of
where
we're
at
as
far
as
being
able
to
obtain
windows.
I
believe
you
understand
you
can
pass
this
and
then
it'll
be
next
year
before
I
get
windows,
and
so
the
easiest
way
to
go
was
been
the
design
that
we
had
to.
F
D
Can
you
just
zoom
into
one
of
the
windows
through
the
section
I
just
want
to
kind
of
understand.
What's
going
on
here.
D
M
D
M
Honestly,
I
don't
I
was
just
meeting.
I
met
with
one
of
the
window,
people
which
I
don't
have
his
name
with
me
that
has
designed
or
did
a
lot
of
work
in
windows
for
the
tampa
heights
area,
and
he
just
said
I
got
you.
D
M
D
M
D
M
D
M
C
M
D
M
M
G
F
I
agree
with
the
kind
of
referring
back
to
staff
with
this
one.
There's
only
just
a
few
bullet
points.
I
think
we
can
work
through
that
and.
E
E
Us
do
we
have
any
issue
with
the
door
that
rear
door
being
recessed
into
the
house.
D
G
All
it
really
needs
is
a
rain,
a
rain
trip
for
the
for
the
head
for
practical
purposes.
I
mean
it
would
it
would
definitely
last
longer,
regardless
of
what
it's
made
out
of.
If
it
had
a
nice,
you
know
shed
roof
over
it.
D
E
D
I
Ones
good
evening,
commissioners
ron
villa
I'm
staff
with
historic
preservation.
This
is
the
final
case
this
evening,
which
is
arc
21-501
for
the
address
of
2802
north
central
court.
This
is
also
in
tampa
heights
historic
district.
There
is
a
non-contributing
structure
that
was
constructed
and
finished.
I
believe
in
2021
this
new
construction
was
reviewed
and
approved
by
this
board
and
you're
going
to
see
a
product
of
your
fruits.
Now
it's
a
very
nice
construction.
I
The
zoning
is
rs50
you're,
going
to
look
at
a
kind
of
glorified
shed
this
this
evening.
It's
about
300
square
foot.
The
request
is
for
an
accessory
structure
with
site
improvements.
I
As
I
said,
you
have
passed
action
on
page
three
that
illustrates
the
new
construction
for
the
primary
house
going
through
the
photo
presentation
property
in
question.
In
1929
it
was
a
vacant
parcel
with
an
accessory
structure.
That's
about
the
location
of
the
accessory
structure,
that's
being
presented
today.
I
I
This
is
the
primary
house
as
it
was
shown.
Sometimes
the
the
construction
doesn't
come
off,
but
you
see
the
the
level
of
detail
and
craftsmanship
at
the
house
just
some
of
the
different
elevations.
You
see
the
the
detail
shingles
on
on
the
upper
level
on
some
of
the
detail
ends
and
the
exposed
rafter
tails
corner
boards
and
the
horizontal
siding.
I
I
This
is
looking
at
the
porta
cashier
from
the
street
internally
and
just
a
shot
of
the
backyard.
As
you
look
through
the
porter
cashier,
the
accessory
structure
will
die
right
behind
the
porch
here,
so
there's
a
clear
connection
to
the
porter
cashier
to
the
accessory
structure.
At
this
time,
the
owner
and
the
agent
will
address
the
board.
K
Hi
good
evening,
I'm
dave
seal
the
owner
and
obviously
the
presenting
agent.
I
apologize
if
my
presentation
doesn't
sound
professional,
because
I
am
not
professional
at
all.
So
I'm
learning
this
as
I
go.
Thank
you
for
approving
the
primary
structure
back
when
we
are
enjoying
the
house
greatly.
K
Yeah
pandemic
hobby,
okay,
so
here's
the
site
plan
existing
structure.
Here
we
already
have
the
porkashare
here
and
this
existing
driveway
pad.
We
would
basically
be
extending
the
driveway
here
and
then
building
a
one-story
garage
shed
there
16
by
20.,
it's
20
foot
in
the
east-west
direction,
16-foot
in
the
north-south
direction.
K
K
K
K
And
the
final
elevation,
this
is
the
south
elevation
which
would
be
facing
in
towards
our
backyard.
We
do
have
the
same
size
window
here
and
just
what
you
call
mandoor,
there's
a
regular
sized
door
and
the
same
trim.
Oh
one
thing
I
did
forget
to
point
out
in
my
original
the
x
here
is
where
I
plan
on
mounting
a
fixture,
which
I
will
show
you
the
detail
on
that
a
light
fixture
and
then
on.
K
My
first
elevation
forgot
to
point
that
out
on
the
first
elevation,
the
same
fixture
one
on
each
side
of
the
garage
door.
K
K
This
is
just
a
little
something
I
printed
out
showing
what
the
trim
and
the
fascia
will
be
made
out
of
it's
a
it
can
be
either
a
cedar
or
a
smooth
finish.
We
don't
I'm
open
to
any
suggestions
on
that,
but
it's
also
a
synthetic
wood,
non-wood,
basically
material,
the
garage
door
that
I
was
planning,
I'm
sourcing
from
the
third
party.
K
K
K
K
K
K
I
Good
evening,
commissioners
ron
vilo
staff's
finding
that
this
application
is
consistent
with
the
tampa
heights
design
guidelines
with
the
following
conditions:
I'd
like
for
him
to
elaborate
on
the
pitch
of
the
roof,
to
show
the
consistency
with
the
primary
structure,
he
did
reference
the
doors,
the
windows
and
the
siding.
I
D
K
K
D
K
D
K
D
K
K
K
D
K
K
K
D
F
Looking
at
the
structure,
you
said,
you've
got
a
six
and
a
four
six.
K
F
K
G
I
have
a
question,
sir,
respecting
your
driveway.
That
is
not
going
to
be
any
different
in
terms
of
its
width
or
materiality
than
what
you
have
right
now,
which
I
believe
is
a
plain
concrete
surface.
K
G
D
Okay,
I
believe
we're
good
then,
and
then
you
have
five
minutes
for
rebuttal.
Anything
that
you
want
to
add
to
the
record
that
we
should
consider.
G
C
D
D
It's
fresh
in
terms
of
the
the
roof
slip
it
being
an
accessory
structure.
Historically
accessory
structures,
don't
always
have
the
same.
F
E
D
To
see
it
so
anyone
entertaining
emotion.