►
From YouTube: TCC 8-26-21 PT 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
C
Thank
you,
madam
deputy
clerk.
Gentlemen.
I
tell
you
we
surprised
enough.
We
got
through
this
morning
agenda.
That's
very
surprising,
but
good
work.
We're
doing
item
number
87,
we'll
go
into
staff
reports
chief
of
staff.
He
has
an
appointment,
so
I
want
to
make
sure
I
get
him
in
and
out
for
administrative
updates.
D
D
So
two
things
we
want
to
talk
about
and
they
are
separate
issues.
One
is
the
updated
coven
report
as
it
relates
to
the
community
and
our
workforce,
and
then
secondly,
I
want
to
give
council
a
brief
overview
of
the
vaccine
policy
that
was
put
out
to
the
the
various
departments,
of
course,
as
well
as
announced
to
the
public
yesterday.
But
we'll
start
with
the
covet
update.
D
Everything
we
do
around
here
starts
with
data
talking
to
the
medical
community
on
a
regular
basis.
Multiple
times
a
day.
We
are
in
a
completely
different
situation
with
this
variant
and
what
john
hopkins
likes
to
call
variants
of
interest,
which
are
those
variants
that
are
knocking
on
the
door
beyond
the
delta
variant
and
just
to
give
you
some
context
externally.
D
That's
alarming!
If
you
take
that
data
and
extrapolate
it
into
the
hospitals,
we
know
from
talking
to
hospital
staff,
and
chief
trip
can
update
you
on
some
of
that.
The
hospital
systems
are
completely
struggling
with
with
care
management,
they're
they're,
waiting
on
the
entrance
ramps,
there's
all
kinds
of
things
going
on
with
the
hospital.
D
I
can
give
you
all
kinds
of
reports
about
how
they're
prioritizing,
but
I'll
leave
that
to
chief
trip,
and
now
what
chief
tripp
can
do
is
tell
you
what
is
happening
in
the
community
as
far
as
testing
and
vaccination
sites,
and
then
what
we
will
do
is
when
chief
trip
is
done
I'll
pivot
and
talk
about
the
recently
introduced
policy
under
these
conditions
by
mayor
castor
in
our
attempt
to
protect
our
employees
and
keep
our
same
level
of
service
going
forward.
So
chief,
do
you
want
to
talk
about
what
we're
doing
in
the
community.
E
Good
after
good
afternoon,
council
chief
trip
temp
fire
rescue
just
to
give
you
a
little
update
on
the
areas
that
we
have
currently
at
lopez.
We
have
as
a
testing
site.
Currently
we
have
given,
or
at
least
tested
over
16
000
individuals.
Since
august
10th,
l
barnes,
we
have
tested
over
5
000
individuals
since
august
16th.
E
D
Thank
you
chief
and
chief,
remind
me
all
the
vaccines
that
we're
aware
of
are
free
of
charge
correct
to
the
community.
E
Yes,
sir,
that
is
correct.
All
the
vaccines
and
the
testing
are
free
to
the
community.
D
Okay-
and
I
know
your
office
and
miss
ocea
wins
office-
have
been
working
hard,
also
in
the
community
to
have
pop-up
sites
and
and
other
opportunities
to
vaccinate,
and
when
we
hear
from
the
medical
community,
what
we
are
hearing
is
that
really,
if
we
can
accelerate
the
vaccination
rate,
that's
going
to
be
our
best
chance
of
overcoming
this
and
any
future
variants.
Is
that
correct.
D
F
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
thank
you,
chief
bennett,
chief
tripp
john.
We
used
to
get
those
daily
updates
with
the
charts
and
the
graphs
and
and
all
that,
and
they
were
extremely
helpful
and
we
could
disseminate
those
to
our
constituents.
I
I
don't
know
if
we're
still
getting
those
and
and
if
not,
why
not.
D
That's
a
great
question
I'll,
let
chief
trip
elaborate,
but
it's
our
understanding
that
when
the
state
you
know,
there's
a
federal
emergency,
a
state
emergency,
a
local
emergency,
but
when
the
state
emergency
orders
subsided,
that
data
either
trickled
down
to
nothing
or
once
a
week
and
it's
hard
for
us
to
actually
get
it
from
all
the
different
sites
that
we
were
doing
and
compile
it
into
report.
D
E
F
Yeah
I
I
I
appreciate
that
I
had
a
feeling
that
that
that
was
that
the
state
was
the
culprit,
but
whatever
information
that
that
you
all
get
whether
or
not
it's
daily
or
weekly,
I'm
sure
would
be
helpful
to
us.
At
least
we
can
see
what
the
trends
are.
Thank
you.
C
E
So
no
sir,
at
l
barnes
it's
a
drive-through
testing
site
only
because
of
the
area
and
location,
it
was
very
difficult
to
try
to
do
a
pop-up
site
there.
So
we
went
the
closest
location
which
is
lee
davis
clinic,
which
is
less
than
a
mile
away,
we're
still
looking
at
the
site
at
lopez.
But
currently
that
is
a
walk-up
site
to
get
the
test
in
only.
C
C
I
guess
that
was
some
confusion.
A
lot
of
folks
were
calling
because
they
thought
al
lopez
was
a
drive
up,
but
apparently
it's
a
walk-up.
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
that
was
that
is
that
disseminated
on
the
flyer
on
our
website.
So
we
can
just
check
to
make
sure
because
some
were
saying
they
thought
it
was
a
drive
up
versus
you're,
saying
it's
a
walk
up.
D
All
right,
thank
you,
chairman
council,
so
two
more
points
to
make,
but
kind
of
related
back
to
the
data
when
we
did
the
return
to
workplace
back
in
early
june,
based
on
everything
subsiding,
the
numbers
were
subsiding,
the
orders
were
subsiding
and
the
world
was
getting
busier,
so
government
levels
of
service
had
to
to
keep
up
with
the
community.
D
We
had
the
first
five
weeks.
We
had
a
significant
drop
from
what
we
had
saw
internally
from
back
in
the
fall
matter
of
fact,
it
was
somewhere
in
the
neighborhood
of
almost
a
300
percent
drop
in
our
internal
cases,
but
the
the
last
five
of
those
ten
weeks
we
had
seen
a
complete
reversal
where
almost
a
200
percent
increase
of
our
personnel
have
either
been
quarantined
or
shown
positive
and
a
few
of
those
cases
of
what
we
call
the
breakthrough
cases
where
somebody's
fully
vaccinated.
D
Yet
they
had
gotten
coveted
and,
thank
goodness
because
of
the
vaccination.
It
appears
that
they
have
recovered
fairly
quickly,
and
I
want
to
make
a
john
hopkins
and
again
we
get
on
these
webinars
constantly
about
the
state
of
the
the
covet
19
nationwide
globally,
as
well
as
the
state
of
the
economy
and
the
one
the
doctors
that
lead.
Those
discussions
tend
to
talk
about
kind
of
the
prophylactics
being
in
in
two
parts.
D
One
is
the
vaccine
and
the
other
is
the
mask
and
and
the
the
metaphor,
the
analogies
that
they
use
is
kind
of
like
being
out
in
the
rain.
If
you
are
vaccinated,
it's
like
having
an
umbrella,
most
likely
you'll,
get
just
a
little
bit
of
a
splash
on
you
and
you.
You
won't
get
fully
wet.
But
if
you
wear,
if
you
have
an
umbrella
and
and
a
raincoat,
the
odds
of
you
getting
wet
at
all
are
almost
slim
to
none.
D
So
for
those
people
that
are
fully
vaccinated
and
wear
a
mask,
they
have
the
least
amount
of
risk
of
contracting
covet
and,
of
course,
the
variants
and
maybe
the
variants
of
interest
that
are
surfacing
around
the
globe.
So
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
encourage
everybody
to
get
vaccinated.
Obviously,
through
the
the
new
policy.
D
I
know,
council
saw
it
at
the
same
time
as
our
staff,
because
everything
is
very
dynamic.
There's
with
4
700
employees
about
20
percent
of
those
employees
are
non-bargaining
about.
80
percent
are
in
for
the
different
collective
bargaining
agreements.
There's
a
lot
of
nuance
that
has
to
be
worked
through
for
implementation.
We've
had
two
internal
communications.
D
So
far
tuesday
night,
the
mayor
put
out
a
letter
of
information
to
all
employees,
about
the
fact
that
the
vaccine
was
coming
on
wednesday
and
then
from
there
this
morning,
we
put
out
discussions
about
how
the
policy
will
be
implemented
and
we're
working
on
that
for
the
next
couple
of
days.
We
have
appointments
with
all
of
the
unions,
as
of
tomorrow,
they've
been
very
supportive
of
the
concept
they
were
part
of
the
announcement.
D
We,
the
mayor,
made
sure
that
we
talked
to
them
on
the
front
end
of
trying
to
put
this
concept
together,
but
the
the
spirit
of
the
entire
policy
is
to
protect
our
employees
and
protect
their
loved
ones,
dependents
and
family
members
and,
at
the
same
time,
keep
up
a
level
of
service
of
a
society.
That's
running
wide
open
schools
are
back
in
it's
a
lot
different
than
when
we
were
teleworking
and
the
world
was
fairly
dormant
back
in
the
early
stages
of
covet.
D
So
trying
to
keep
up
these
levels
of
service
and
protect
the
employees
and
their
loved
ones.
Family
and
friends
are
the
most
paramount
two
pegs
that
we're
trying
to
solve,
and
we
will
keep
council
posted
as
much
as
possible.
A
C
C
This
show
you
asked
me
in
reference
to
moving
an
item
from
mr
vera
that
correct
sir.
G
H
C
H
On
you,
sir,
oh
sorry,
okay
yeah!
No,
I
mean
I
I
for
the
interest
of
time.
We
have
a
long
day.
I
mean
I
I
I
think
this
is
a
very,
very
important
issue.
It
is.
It
is
to
me
a
relevant
issue
for
the
city
of
tampa,
because
we're
going
to
have
in
in
florida
and
the
city
of
tampa
in
hillsborough
county
refugees
come
from
afghanistan.
In
2015,
we
encountered
a
similar
situation
where
we
had
syrian
refugees
who
were
coming
to
the
tampa
area.
H
There
was
some
dispute
back
then
with
the
governor
that
I
hope
we
don't
have
today,
where
the
governor,
at
the
time,
rick
scott,
wasn't
going
to
allow
refugees
to
come
in,
but
mayors,
buckhorn
and
christman
said
that
we
should
allow
these
individuals
to
be
welcomed
in
our
city.
H
Again,
I
don't
anticipate
that
kind
of
an
issue,
but
without
going
on
about
it,
I
think
it's
it's
important
for
us
to
do
this
for
two
reasons:
number
one
to
show
that
we
do
have
a
welcoming
attitude
as
a
city
when
it
comes
to
these
refugees
and
then
number
two
that
we,
as
as
public
officials
and
as
a
city,
are
going
to
help
to
organize
the
different
stakeholders
in
the
community,
the
religious
stakeholders,
the
the
civic
and
charitable
stakeholders
that
can
do
such
a
tremendous
job
in
terms
of
welcoming
these
afghan
refugees.
H
Here
you
know,
for
me,
it's
a
very
important
issue,
because
my
parents
and
grandparents
and
great
grandmother
were
cuban
refugees.
We
came
here
in
1960
and
I
always
say
that
the
the
the
level
of
compassion
that
we
experienced
on
so
many
accounts
60
years
ago
should
still
be
available
to
people
today
and
that's
kind
of
something
that
we
often
see.
Is
that
a
lot
of
folks,
you
know,
use
a
method
or
climb
a
ladder?
H
I
guess
if
you
will,
as,
for
example,
a
refugee
50
60
70
whatever
years
ago,
and
then
we
tend
to
forget
where
we
come
from
and-
and
I
think
that's
something
that
is
americans-
that
we
really
can't
do
is
forget
where
we
come
from,
especially
on
this
issue.
We
know
that
over
the
last
four
years,
we've
seen
a
90
reduction
in
the
number
of
refugees
in
the
united
states,
and
so
there's
a
won't
get
into
that
a
lot
of
controversy
there.
H
Obviously,
but
again,
this
is
to
me
a
matter
of
our
best
american
values
being
reflected
for
these
refugees
and
I
think
the
the
folks
who
spoke
on
this,
especially
those
from
afghanistan.
I
know
it's
something
that's
very
important
to
them,
and
we've
also
spoken
to
a
lot
of
people
who
are
of
veterans
for
whom
this
is
so
important,
because
so
many
of
these
people
help
the
american
mission.
So
again,
I
just
want
a
welcoming
culture
here
in
tampa.
I
don't
think
this
is
controversial
at
all
and
thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
I'd
like
to
second
that
and
echo
the
comments
of
councilmember
vieira.
I
You
know
he
and
I
are
both
children
of
of
immigrants,
we're
first-generation
americans
and
if
you
look
at
the
history
of
the
city
of
tampa,
the
city
is
built,
the
foundation
of
the
city
is
built
by
immigrants
built
by
people
from
all
over
the
world.
So
this
is
just
a
continuation
of
who
we
are
we're
open
and
welcoming
to
anyone
and
everyone,
and
I'm
glad
that
he
brought
this
up.
So
I'd
like
to
second
that.
C
Question,
mr
carlson,
you
recognized.
J
J
They
came
for
economic
freedom
from
an
economic
opportunity
from
sweden,
but
we
are
a
country
of
immigrants
and
we
need
to
be
welcoming
of
immigrants
and
tampa
in
particular
needs
to
be
welcoming,
and
we
have
a
large
muslim
and
arab
community
here,
and
we
in
particular
need
to
make
sure
we
work
with
the
community
there
to
welcome
folks
coming
in
and,
as
was
said,
we
need
to
be
respectful
of
all
the
service
people,
especially
around
sitcom
and
mcdill,
that
have
sacrificed
a
lot
to
help
the
situation
at
afghanistan
and
other
places.
J
That
being
said,
I've
also
gotten
a
lot
of
calls
in
the
last
few
days
about
neighborhood
leaders
and
others
frustrated
that
we're
talking
about
foreign
policy
issues
instead
of
instead
of
focusing
our
limited
time
on
on
city
issues,
and
so
I
just
throw
that
out
there.
J
J
Embassy
in
turkey-
and
you
know
horrific
horrific
things
have
gone
on,
and
I
think
we
should.
We
agree
with
the
the
heart
and
spirit
of
this
as
we
go
forward.
We
we
need
to
decide
how
much
we
get
into
foreign
policy
if
we're.
If
we're,
if
we're
going
to
get
into
foreign
policy
in
a
big
way,
I've
got
a
lot
of
ideas
related
to
foreign
policy
also,
but
the
other
thing
is
that
the
the
muslim
community
reached
out
to
us
and
in
particular
in
email,
they
said
something.
J
Well,
I
think
that,
similar
to
the
cuba
resolution,
this
is
really
long.
The
cuba
resolution
had
quotes
from
jose
marti.
This
one
has
george
washington
and
thomas
paine.
I
think
that
we
could
simply
say
we
support
and
welcome
refugees
coming
from
whatever
country,
but
in
particular
from
afghanistan
if
we
want,
but
the
muslim
community
went
through
line
by
line
and
gave
us
some
specific
feedback
on
on.
What's
in
it,
they
want
us
to
add
more
action,
more
substance,
and
I
think
some
of
it.
J
We
can't
because
it's
federal
policy,
but
I
would
be
curious
to
see
what
the
maker
of
the
motion
would
like
to
do
in
response
to
the
muslim
community.
But
in
particular
I
want
to
point
out
that
they
felt
there
were
certain
words
that
were
derogatory
or
inflammatory
that
they
wanted
to
take
out,
such
as
the
word
terror,
and
this
was
an
email
I
think
that
went
to
all
of
us,
and
so
I'm
just
I'm
just
curious
to
see
if
that
will,
if,
if
anybody
has
plans
to
take
that
out,
thank
you.
C
F
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Mr
vera,
I
appreciate
you
bringing
this
this
one
forward.
I
you
know
I've
been
on
record
just
saying
kind
of
similar
to
what
what
bill
said
a
minute
ago
about
some
of
the
other
constituents.
F
You
know
I
I
think
we
should
try
and
and
stay
local
as
much
as
possible.
I
I
think
you
and
I
philosophically
and
politically
are
very
much
aligned
and
we
can
have
lunch
and
and
agree
on
99
of
everything
out
there
in
the
world,
but
in
terms
of
what
we
were
elected
for.
I
think
we
go
people
elect
us
to
do.
You
know
this
101
item
agenda
of
local
of
local
issues.
F
F
We
all
remember
it
well
and,
and
now
we
see
the
pictures
of
the
helicopter
being
thrown
over
the
edge
and
and
and
the
vietnamese
who
helped
us
and
worked
with
us
being
left
behind
and
I'm
sure
many
many
many
of
them
perished,
and
I
and
I
and
now
I
watch
the
news
and
it
you
know
it's
deja
vu
all
over
again
it's
happening
and
so
to
the
extent
that
our
community
can
send
a
message
lewis.
F
I
agree
with
you
loud
and
clear:
we'll
send
a
message
that
tampa
is
a
welcoming
place,
I'm
not
going
to
get
into
the
rights
or
wrongs
of
why
we
were
there
for
20
years,
but
we
were
and
and
and
the
fact
that
we
were.
We
had
a
lot
of
local
afghanis
who
were
friends
of
america
during
that
20-year
period,
and
we
can't
abandon
them
now.
H
Floor
and
thank
you
very
much,
and
I
appreciate
those
words
councilman
ding
felder
and
councilman
menescalco
a
couple
of
things
again.
There
is
a
mischaracterization.
I
don't
know
if
it's
intentional
of
what
I'm
trying
to
do
here
last
time
I
was
told
that
a
resolution
that
this
body
passed
was
somehow
trying
to
set
us
up
to
go
to
war
with
with
cuba.
You
know
I
find
councilman
carlson
saying
that
I'm
dealing
with
number
one
we're
not
dealing
with
foreign
policy
issues.
H
This
is
something
about
refugees
who
are
going
to
be
coming,
we're
not
saying
do
something
in
afghanistan,
etc.
These
folks
are
going
to
be
coming
here
and
it's
whether
or
not
we
are
welcoming
to
them.
That
is
part
of
who
we
are
as
a
city
and
to
take
five
minutes
out
and
to
express
that
in
a
resolution
I
don't
think
is
outside
of
the
scope
of
what
we
should
be
doing.
H
Frankly
again,
I
find
it
very
ironic
because
one
of
the
first
things
that
was
done
in
this
new
council
was
to
do
a
resolution
on
travel
with
cuba.
After
president,
then,
president
trump
sought
to
implement
on
significant
foreign
policy
changes
on
travel
with
cuba.
That
was
a
resolution
that
passed
seven
to
zero
and
a
resolution
that
councilman
carlson
gave
to
the
ambassador
from
cuba
from
cuba.
I'm
not
looking
at
doing
anything
like
that.
This
is
a
very
simple
local
issue,
which
is
whether
or
not
we
are
going
to
be
welcoming
refugees.
H
Here,
I
don't
think
that's
an
issue.
Frankly,
that
is
a
foreign
policy
issue.
I
don't
deal
with
foreign
policy
issues
etc.
For
me,
this
is
something
that
is
a
hundred
and
ten
percent
local.
It
defines
our
values
and
who
we
are
going
to
be
as
the
city.
If
somebody
says
that
it's
outside
of
our
scope,
I
would
respectfully
disagree.
I've
given
other
council
members
who
deal
with
issues
like,
for
example,
travel
within
cuba,
some
respectful
professional
deference
on
that
this
issue
here
is
very
personal.
H
I
have
district
7
that
includes
many
many
refugees
from
places
like
afghanistan,
like
syria,
in
this
issue,
as
it
applies
to
whether
or
not
we're
going
to
have
a
welcoming
community
here
in
tampa
is
very
relevant.
Let's
not
forget
that,
a
couple
of
years
ago,
when
I
was
first
elected,
we
had
such
a
significant
hate
crime
here
in
the
city
of
tampa
when
the
new
tampa
mosque
right
was
attacked
and
fire
bombed
off
of
morris
bridge
road
right.
H
These
are
the
kinds
of
issues
of
tolerance
and
welcoming
of
refugees
that
the
city
of
tampa
has
got
to
take
a
stand,
for
I
say
that
as
a
proud
son
of
refugees,
this
is
not
a
foreign
policy
issue.
This
is
as
local
as
it
gets,
because
if
the
city
of
tampa
is
not
going
to
take
a
formally
welcome
attitude
on
people
who
are
coming
here
as
refugees,
like
my-
and
these
are
refugees,
these
are
not
economic
immigrants.
H
C
Right,
gentlemen,
I
let
both
of
you
speak
mr
carlson,
once
we,
but
after
that
we
will
bring
it
for
a
landing.
There
is
a
motion
on
the
floor.
Regardless
regards
our
foreign
policy.
This
council
doesn't
get
any
foreign
policy,
we're
no
authority
before
our
policy,
but
we
do
have
the
right
to
talk
about
a
city
that
is
welcoming.
Mr
carlson,
you
have
the
floor,
sir
you're
recognized.
J
Yeah,
first
of
all,
I
want
to
say
again
I
appreciate
the
intent
and
I
completely
agree
with
the
the
idea
and
focus
of
being
a
welcoming
community.
J
My
concern,
which
was
similar
to
last
time,
is
that,
as
I
remember,
this
is
like
a
three-page
resolution.
It
doesn't
simply
say
we
want
to
welcome
refugees
that
has
all
kinds
of
other
extraneous
language,
and
I
don't
object
to
the
intent.
I
didn't
object
to
the
intent.
Last
time
I
objected
to
the
other
extraneous
language
which
has
other
meanings
that
I
think
borders
on
foreign
policy
of
not
stepping
into
it.
J
But
the
question
that
I
would
like
to
have
answered
the
the
one
of
the
umbrella
muslim
organizations
emailed
us
all
and
asked
us
specifically
to
take
certain
of
certain
offensive
words
out
of
this,
and
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
new,
a
new
draft
or
not,
but
they.
Let
me
set
aside
the
the
other
discussion.
Are
we
going
to
leave
those
specifically
large?
J
C
J
I
don't
know
if
you
all
got
it,
I
think
you
did
it.
This
is
an
email
from
mdf
yeah
last
night,
everybody
got
it,
but
it's
cara
is
part
of
mdf
and
I'm
trying
to
pull
it
up,
but
the
first
line
in
what
they
say.
I
can't
remember
word
for
word
here.
It
is
you
know
we.
The
undersigned
organizations
would
like
to
thank
councilman
louisville
for
his
initiative
and
for
proposing
afghan
a
refugee
resolution.
We
are
wholeheartedly
in
support
of
the
resolution
and
would
like
all
council
members
to
vote
in
favor.
J
We
also
propose
the
following
amendments
for
consideration:
number
one.
Please
avoid
using
language
that
may
offend
or
alienate
groups
of
indiv
or
individuals.
This
includes
the
overuse
of
the
word
terror
or
phrases
like
all
good
americans,
which
can
create
unnecessary
division
number
two,
because
the
population
of
afghanistan
is
99.7
percent
muslim.
Please
ensure
that
local
efforts
to
paid
incoming
refugees
are
led
by
local
muslim
agencies,
and
then
it
lists
them,
and
then
there
are
four
other
points.
J
I
think
those
other
four
are
mostly
federal
issues,
but
my
question:
what
their
point,
I
think,
with
the
other
four,
is
to
try
to
add
some
more
meat
or
substance
into
it,
besides,
just
being
a
general
welcome,
so
my
question
is
considering
that
this
umbrella
group
of
many
muslim
groups
asked
us
to
do
these
things.
Are
we
going
to
edit
it
or
just
vote
on
it,
as
is
well.
H
C
We've
had
two
rebuts
now
at
this
particular
fine,
the
maker
of
the
of
the
resolution,
which
would
be
mr
vieira
if
he
chooses
to
want
to
change
or
there's
any
other
counselor
who
wants
to
have
an
amendment
to
his
mo
to
his
resolution
with
him
consenting
that
will
be
up
to
them
now
before
I
even
get
to
mr
vieira.
Is
there
any
other
councilman
that
is
looking
to
amend
any
other
wording
in
the
current
resolution?
That
is
on
the
floor?
A
F
So,
mr
vieira,
to
try
and
make
this
as
uncontroversial
as
possible
and
to
perhaps
get
a
unanimous
vote
in
this
council
if
we
struck
the
words
fleeing
prosecution
and
terror,
I
think
the
message
is
still
the
same,
because
it
would
it
would
read-
and
I'm
just
reading
off
the
agenda.
But
I
assume
it's
the
same
in
the
actual
resolution,
but
it
would.
It
would
then
read
expressing
unequivocal
support
of
welcoming
afghan
refugees
strike
those
words
fleeing
prosecution
and
terror,
and
then
it
would
pick
up
refugees
into
our
inclusive
community.
K
Miranda,
I
I'm
everybody
listening.
I
I
don't
understand.
If
somebody
I
don't
care
who
they
are
put
something
like
this
in
writing
and
if
somebody
that
part
of
this
organ
objects
to
it,
what
the
hell's
the
difference
there
there
is
terror
in
afghanistan.
There
is
killing
in
afghanistan.
If
you
don't
believe
that,
then,
when
the
hell,
how
come
we
lost?
So
many
people
died
for
the
blood,
the
people
who
died.
K
K
Because
something
has
got
and
I'm
not
on
either
side
here,
but
I'm
just
saying
you
know
what
these
things
have
got
either
end
or
if
we're
going
to
dissect
every
word
on
a
resolution.
All
it
means
forget
all
these
pages.
All
it
means
is
you're
welcome
to
come
to
tampa,
be
a
nice
person
enjoy
yourself
and
you'll.
Welcome
this
city,
we're
not
going
to
discriminate
against
you
in
essence,
that's
what
it
means,
whether
it's
this
one
and
any
other
one,
and
I
I
just
don't
understand
it.
K
C
H
Bring
it
for
a
landing
like
you
said,
so
I
actually
spoke
with
some
folks
on
that
issue.
I
always
have
a
good
number
of
meetings
with
islamic
and
other
leaders
here
in
the
in
the
community,
have
a
very
good
relationship,
etc.
On
the
on
the
issue
of
good
americans
and
what
that
means,
that
means
that
good
americans
reject
bigotry
and
support
refugees.
H
I
don't
think
that's
controversial
on
the
issue
of
the
organizations
I
I
actually
was
going
to
again
I'm
sorry
with
my
that
on
section
three
over
here,
I
would
like
to
move
to
strike
the
names
of
organizations
and
just
put
the
appropriate
organizations
to
welcome
refugees,
because
I
think
there
was
an
inference
made
or
a
mistake
made
on
the
part
of
some
that
somehow
that's
the
list
of
people
that
no
this
is
a
resolution.
That
is
an
aspiration
that
we
should
live
to
as
elected
official.
H
With
regards
to
the
issue
of
terror
and
and
and
what
not,
I
I
don't
see
the
need
to
take
that
out.
I
just
respectfully
don't
this
again,
I'm
very
surprised.
This
has
lasted
longer
than
one
minute
in
terms
of
the
the
debate
on
this.
I'm
not
I'm
not
looking
at
doing
anything
other
than
simply
saying
the
city
of
tampa
is
welcoming
of
these
refugees.
C
All
right
so
at
this
point
at
this
point,
what
I'm
hearing
is
you
you're
not
inclined
to
to
to
amend
the
word
terror
from
mr
dingfield
or
mr
carlser,
but
you
are
looking
to
change.
One
portion
of
the
organizations
listed
in
the
resolution
is
that
correct,
sir?
Absolutely
yes,
sir,
mr
shelby
you're
recognized.
G
Just
as
the
record
is
clear,
then,
if
you
take
a
look
at
the
title,
the
title
says
requesting
that
all
local
public
entities
work
with
appropriate
social
service
organizations
to
welcome
refugees.
Do
you
wish
to
then
make
the
language
in
section
three
consistent
with?
What's
in
the
title,
then
certainly
yeah,
sure,
okay,.
K
H
J
C
H
C
G
Just
a
question
on
how
this
works
is
that
then
the
amendment
you
so
you're
and
the
seconder
of
that
motion
is
and
do
you
agree
with
the
as
as
amended.
So
that's
what's
on
the
floor
now?
Okay!
So
it's
not
it's
not
a
motion
to
admit
it's
a
motion
to
accept
it
as
amended.
K
J
B
J
J
C
F
I'll,
let
the
chief
go
ahead
and
describe
what
the
basic
item
is
and
then
I'll
I'll
elaborate.
With
my
question
and
comment.
L
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank
you,
council,
ruben,
delgado
assistant
chief
item.
Five
is
the
the
rfp
we
put
out
for
our
psych
evals
that
we
use
for
our
pre-employment
screenings
every
applicant
that
comes
in
that
we
go
through
the
hiring
process
with
goes
to
a
psyche
valve
it's
the
same
company
that
we
will
use
for
our
specialty
team
applications,
certain
specialty
teams.
L
We
send
them
through
the
same
type
of
psychological
evaluations,
to
make
sure
there's
no
issues
with
them
there
as
well,
and
then,
if
we
have
traumatic
events,
a
police
shooting
or
some
other
event
that
they
have
to
intervene
and
do
some
sort
of
something
we
deem
is
tragic.
We
send
them
to
get
evaluated
before
they
go
back
to
the
street.
So
that's
basically
what
this
contract's
for
and
if
you
have
any
questions
on
it,
I'd
be
more
than
happy
to
answer
it.
F
Okay,
thank
you,
chief
yeah.
I
wholeheartedly
support
this
agenda
item
earlier
in
the
week
when,
when
you-
and
I
talked
my
question,
was
you
know
when
when
do
we
use
this
service
and
then
is
there
an
opportunity
to
expand
this
beyond
beyond
it?
F
So
right
now
we
use
these
services
for
new
hires
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
chief
for
for
new
hires
to
screen
them
psychologically
make
sure
they're
they're
the
type
of
folks
that
we
want
in
tpd-
and
I
guess
is
this
also
tfr
and
then
and
then
also
if
the
office,
an
officer
or
fireman
or
woman,
is
exposed
to
a
traumatic
event
or
is
involved
in
a
shooting.
Then
they
go
back
into
the
psychological
service
just
to
make
sure
they're
clear
right,
correct
so.
C
F
Okay,
so
my
question,
my
question
is-
and
I
sort
of
alluded
to
it
this
morning
when,
when
we
had
officer
of
the
officer
of
the
month,
is
you
know,
can
we
expand
this
program
to
have
regular
screenings
for
all
officers,
all
at
least
all
street
officers?
F
Because
we
know
it's
a
stressful
job,
especially
these
past
year
and
a
half?
It's
just.
You
know
more
stressful
than
ever.
I'm
sure
I
can
only
imagine
so.
Can
we
expand
it
whereby
regular?
You
know
street
officers
would
come
in
every
you
know.
I
don't
know
whatever
you
decide.
You
know
every
year
to
every
two
years
for
just
a
basic,
a
basic
checkup
just
like
I
said
this
morning,
just
like
we.
F
We
want
to
get
their
blood
checked
and
we
want
to
get
their
heart
checked
and-
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
that
they're,
that
they're
good
and
we're
not
trying
to
run
anybody
out
we're
actually
just
trying
to
make
sure
the
officers
are
emotionally
healthy
and
and
that's
for
their
own
benefit
as
much
as
anybody
any
any
any
any.
L
Response
yeah-
and
I-
and
I
appreciate
that,
and-
and
I
think
you
guys
heard
this
morning-
corporal
baker
and
the
program
he
went
to
so
I'll-
talk
about
a
little
bit
about
that,
but
just
so
to
give
it
kind
of
a
little
bit
of
perspective.
This
is
this
contract
here,
wouldn't
address
some
of
that
stuff.
L
Some
of
the
things
we
use
now
that
help
officers
is
obviously
we
have
the
eap
program
where,
if
they
feel
like
they
need
to
go
talk
to
somebody,
they
can
go
voluntary
now
and
talk
to
whoever
they
need
to
talk
to
through
the
services.
The
city
provides
what
you
heard
this
morning
with
operation
restore
that
is
through
the
franciscan
center.
L
That
is
something
that
actually
mayor
caster
started
when
she
was
the
chief
here
for
officers
to
go
on
a
basically
a
retreat
that
they
go
and
that
right
now
is
funded.
We
find
internal
funding
for
that
for
officers
to
go
to
that
and
then
sometimes
our
foundation,
the
rise
foundation
will
step
up
and
offer
some
seats
in
there
if
an
officer
really
wants
to
go
to
that
retreat.
L
So
that's
what's
currently
in
place
having
something
you
know
several
years
back,
we
did
the
live
scan
for
them
for
a
physical
check
and
we
offered
that
to
them
if
they
were
willing
to
do
that,
we
gave
them
the
ability
to
go,
get
physically
checked
through
life
scan.
So
I
could
see
something
similar
to
that.
Just
on
the
mental
check
like
you're
talking
about
again,
that
would
be
a
conversation
with
the
union
with
us
and
obviously
there's
a
funding
side
there
that
we
would
have
to
work
through.
F
Well,
not
to
belabor
this.
I
don't
know
how
the
rest
of
the
council
feels.
I
think
the
discussion
is
is
worth
having
not
only
do
I
think
it's
would
be
important
for
the
individual
officers
but
clearly
important
to
the
community,
because
you
know,
tragically,
if
somebody's
sort
of
slipping
over
the
edge,
but
nobody
really
notices,
then
maybe
a
regular
screening
might
catch
catch.
Some
of
that
and
we
could
provide
help
before
you
know
before
anything
bad
happens.
So
I'd
like
to
make
a
very
friendly
motion
to
to
tonight.
C
F
C
C
That's
open
for
the
police
department
any
in
hr
to
scrutinize
that
versus
in
eap
separately,
because
when
you
look
at
psychological
that
automatic
goes
to
the
police
department
they're
going
to
view
that
that's
a
free
screening
when
you
talk
about
a
fitness
for
duty,
police
department
is
going
to
get
that
and
review
that
so
there's
different
measures.
You
could
say
that
will
deal
with
what
this
they're
asking
for
versus
what
you're
trying
to
implement.
L
Agree
chief,
so
I
think
what
we're
saying
is
is
the
way
this
program's
set
up.
This
is
the
contract
we
have
with
the
psych
examination
where
we
get
the
results
right
and
we
know
whether
they're
fit
for
duty,
whether
they're
fit
to
be
a
law
enforcement
officer,
and
we
see
those
results.
L
C
That's
the
most
scariest
thing
for
a
police
officer
when
you're
told
to
go
for
a
fitness
for
duty,
but
I
can
say
and
I'll
get
to
that
point.
When
scotch
was
the
psych
doctor,
he
was
the
fairest
guy
ever
seen
and
he
didn't
always
agree
with
the
police
department
sending
people
for
fitness
for
duty
just
to
send
them.
So
I
don't
know
about
the
bailey
group.
That's
why
I
asked
the
chief
how
many
doctors
does
this
group
have
and
I
don't
I
don't,
I
think
scott
could
retire
or
retire.
C
Then
they
got
somebody
else,
and
I
don't
know
how
the
services
have
been
with
this
other
gentleman
that
they've
had
that's.
Why
I
asked
the
bailey
group:
is
there
multiple
doctors
in
there,
because
sometimes
you
can
screen
a
person,
but
you
know
just
like
anything:
one
person
may
screen
different
others
and
it
may
be
a
baseline
here.
I
don't
know
that's
why
I
asked
in
reference
to
the
bailey
group:
do
they
have
multiple
doctors
in
that
office
that
are
doing
the
testing
for
the
psychological.
L
Yeah,
so
they
do
have
a
staff,
and
don't
quote
me
on
the
number
of
staff
members
she
has
she's,
not
by
herself.
She
has
a
staff
with
her
for
that
team.
So
that
is,
you
know,
while
it
says
bailey
with
the
psychological,
there
is
a
staff
of
team
members
with
her
that
work
with
her.
So
so,
and
I
and
I
want
to
reiterate
something
real
quick
just
on
the
eap.
That's
that's
across
the
board
for
city
employees
right.
That's!
Anybody
who
needs
to
reach
out
to
the
eap
system,
that's
accessible
to
anybody.
F
H
F
Chairman
goods,
you
know,
you've
got
personal
experience
and
you
know
the
nuts
and
bolts
of
this
and
you
like
to
work
out
the
nuts
and
bolts
I'm
sort
of
a
big
picture
guy
and
what
I'm?
What
I'm
suggesting
is
that
the
chief
delgado
or
anybody
in
his
staff
look
around
the
country.
Look
around
the
state,
see
who
else
is
doing
this
weigh
the
pros
and
cons
talk
to
the
union.
You
know:
do
the
kind
of
in-depth
detailed
work
just
like
they
did
on
the
other.
C
I
would
agree
with
you,
I
would
agree
with
you
a
lot
of
times.
Officers
hide
the
emotion
of
the
stresses
going
on,
and
so
maybe
as
if,
as
you're
indicated,
if
you're
looking
around
the
country
to
where.
If,
if
once
a
year
or
every
three
or
four
years,
a
person's
evaluation
comes
up,
you
know
they
go
to
ea,
but
that's
still
privately,
and
it's
not
a
part
of
the
police
department's
record
or
they're,
not
scrutinized.
C
F
You
know
a
thousand
officers
whatever
it
is.
If
every
idea
has
to
go
every
couple
years
and
the
results
are
private,
unless
something
gets
flagged,
that
that
is
serious
and
needs
to
get
to
the
attention
of
those
supervisors,
so
they
might
have
a
threshold
or
something
like
that
and
chief.
I
think
you
told
me
that
even
right
now
in
the
eap
process,
didn't
you
tell
me
that
that
there's
a
there
is
a
sort
of
a
warning
flag
that
pops
up
every
now
and
then.
L
F
F
But
anyway,
like
I
say,
I
don't
know
the
nuts
and
bolts
of
this,
what
I
would
like
is
just
for
tpd
and
tfr.
I
guess,
if
it's
applicable
with
tfr,
to
to
look
into
what
I'm
talking
about
look
around
the
country,
I'm
sure
we're
not
inventing
the
wheel
here
and
come
back
with
with
the
staff
report.
You
know
six
months
from
now
and
and
and
let
us
know
what
you
find
and
and
the
pros
and
cons
and
and
the
pba
reaction
and
everything
else.
K
K
K
You
brought
it
up
for
a
discussion,
councilman
dingbatter.
As
chair
of
this
committee,
I
prefer
to
move
the
resolution.
F
C
Right,
mr
mr
central
move,
the
resolution,
mr
miranda.
Second,
all
in
favor.
C
C
B
G
F
Okay,
so
I'll
move
the
the
tpg
working
with
tfr
explore
and
investigate
the
possibility
of
adding
additional
psychological
screening
services
to
to
both
departments.
F
G
January,
okay,
I'm
just
I'm
just
cons.
C
L
Want
to
real
quick,
I
appreciate
the
concern.
I
really
do,
I'm
glad
you
guys
brought
it
up,
but
I
I
want
to
just
make
sure
that
that
you
guys
know
as
of
today
us
and
chief
tripp.
You
know
we,
we
do
have
debriefing
sessions
on
major
engines,
so
we
are
doing
things
to
check
on
the
mental
health
of
our
officers,
but
I
do
appreciate
this
and
we'll
certainly
look
into
it.
L
G
And
count,
I'm
sorry
count
councilman
ding
fella.
Do
you?
Did
you
request
a
specific
deck
time
of
time
frame?
We
could.
F
Oh,
so
I'm
glad
I'm
super
glad
to
support
the
additional
body
cameras.
I
think
they're
valuable.
F
The
only
thing
I
asked
the
chief
about
earlier
this
week
was:
what
sort
of
information
are
they
gathering
about
the
use
of
body
cameras
you
know
and
and
and
how
is
that
being
reported,
and
is
that
being
reported
to
council?
So
that's
that's
my
question
on
six.
I
totally
support
the
item.
L
Is
that
to
me,
sir?
Yes,
sir?
So
I
can
tell
you
we
review,
you
know
the
650
that
we
initially
bought
was
our
initial
purchase
and
we
also
had
a
10
reserve,
along
with
that
650.,
when
we
expanded
this
over
to
all
the
corporals
and
some
of
the
specialty
units.
We
added
additional
52
cameras,
that's
what
this
purchase
is
for.
However,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
you
guys
know
that
we
haven't.
L
We
moved
forward
with
with
putting
those
52
cameras
on
the
street
immediately
using
that
10
reserve
of
the
6,
the
65
we
had.
So
this
is
basically
a
purchase
for
those
52
and
15
fleet
dui
cameras.
So
I
could
tell
you,
as
far
as
what
we
get
out
of
the
body,
worn
cameras.
L
We
have
monthly
audits
that
are
set
up.
The
system
will
randomly
pick
10
videos
per
the
squad
that
the
sergeants
have
to
super
to
watch
just
for
quality
assurance
checks.
Anytime,
an
officer
is
using
a
certain
level
of
force
that
body
worn.
Camera
has
to
be
reviewed
by
the
sergeant
and
the
lieutenant
and
then
documented
in
the
report
that
they
reviewed
it
for
accuracy,
and
we
don't
see
a
training
issue.
We
don't
see
anything
there
so.
F
Chief,
is
there
going
to
be
an
annual
report
as
related
to
body
cameras,
just
internal,
you
know,
for
you
guys
or.
L
F
Okay,
so
that
that
would
be
my
only
request
after
before
or
after
we
move
the
item,
mr
citro
would
be
as
a
separate
motion
just
to
have
the
an
annual
report
come
to
city
council
about
how
the
body
worn
cameras
program
is
going.
F
I
think
that
was
an
extremely
important
issue
for
the
community
and
I
think
for
the
community
to
hear
about
the
results
and
the
annual
results-
and
you
know
you
know
would
be-
would
be
valuable
not
only
to
council
but,
more
importantly,
to
the
community.
So,
mr
c.
C
I
think
the
chief
told
me
in
his
meeting
that
when
they
are
checked
he
can
he
he
will
know
who
checked
it
at
any
time
that
correct
chief.
L
L
I
I
think
all
the
officers
would
agree
that
you
know
having
a
camera
all
now
when
they
go
do
their
job
is,
is
more
beneficial
for
them
in
the
long
run,
and
we
get
to
see
like
just
like
we
talked
about
this
morning
with
corporal
baker.
You
know
when
you
can
see
that
on
video
with
that
guy
holding
the
knife
to
that
lady's
head
and
him
de-escalate
that
entire
situation
three
years
ago,
four
years
ago,
we
would
have
never
seen
that.
C
All
right,
were
you
ready
to
move
the
resolution.
C
B
I
K
B
K
B
Motion
carried
unanimously
with
vieira
being
abstinent
vote
and
mr
chairman,
based
upon
what
the
chief
said,
I
think
it'd
be
healthy
for.
F
Council
to
get
an
annual
report,
I
don't
want
the
department
to
have
to
reinvent
the
wheel,
but
just
compile
whatever
data
information,
audits,
etc,
that
they
think
are
relevant
and
and
present
it
to
council
once
a
year.
F
You
know
for
lack
of
a
better
time.
Let's
say
starting
a
year
from
now
in
you
know,
in
august.
K
You
you
are
asking
just
for
a
verbal
written
report,
no
videos,
because
we
have
to
be
kind
of
touchy
on
that
there
might
be
information
that
is
not
meant
to
be
out
to
the
public.
F
Thanks
for
the
clarification,
no,
I
was
just
looking
for
a
written,
a
written
report
and
then,
if
we
have
any
questions,
we
can
always
ask
ask
the
chief
to
join
us
at
that
time.
C
C
All
right,
gentlemen:
we've
already
made
a
consent,
docket
for
89
981-8293,
we'll
go
to
item
number
94.
M
Good
afternoon,
council
dennis
rojero
chief
financial
officer-
thank
you
for
having
me
here,
of
course,
as
most
of
us
have
discussed,
this
is
a
request
to
extend
a
maturity
date
for
our
current
line
of
credit,
not
to
exceed
60
million
dollars.
This
is
not
a
request
for
additional
debt.
This
is
simply
to
give
us
a
little
time
to
repay
the
remaining
25
million.
We
owe
as
part
of
a
larger
bond
issuance
either
later
this
year
or
early
next
year.
M
Of
course,
mr
massey
and
I
have
provided
a
memo
to
council
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Any.
F
So
the
reason
I
I
pulled
this
and
dennis-
and
I
had
a
good
conversation
yesterday,
but
I
do
think
it's
important
for
the
public
to
hear
the
what
it.
What
is
our
current
use
of
the-
and
I
know
you
probably
said
it
in
the
memo.
But
what
is
our
current
use
of
the
line
of
credit,
mr
o'hara,
and
and
and
and
how
did
we
accumulate,
that
particular
debt.
M
Certainly,
I
can,
I
believe
I
get
some
of
that
summarize
that
pretty
succinctly
we
took
the
line
of
credit
out
in
2016,
anticipating
to
use
almost
50.
That's
why
it's
not
to
exceed
60,
just
in
case
continuing
to
use
about
50
million
dollars
for
storm
water
projects
and
general
government
office
project
or
general
government
projects.
M
M
It
has
always
been
our
plan
to
do
some
something
similar
with
the
remaining
25
million
and
to
specifically
answer
your
question.
The
25
million
we've
drawn
down
so
far
has
been
used
a
little
over
14
million
for
mobility
projects,
including
resurfacing
old
city
hall,
renovations
of
approximately
four
million
dollars
technology
upgrades
of
over
four
million
dollars,
and
then
you'll
recall
the
recent
hannah
avenue,
design
and
demo
item
for
a
little
over
six
million
dollars.
M
Somewhat
somewhat
as
a
as
we
get
into
detail
in
the
memo,
the
the
upshot
is
we
we're
going
to
get
a
little
better
terms
with
a
little
bit
of
savings
and
that's
associated
with
what
we
call
the
libor
rate.
The
london
interbank
offered
rate
it's
composed
of
two
portions.
M
The
smaller
portion
is
the
base
portion
and
that's
what
may
change?
We
don't
anticipate
it's
going
to
change
very
much,
nor
do
our
finance
professionals,
the
much
larger
portion
is
the
spread
portion
and
that
will
remain
fixed.
So
when
you
have
that
very
very
small
portion
that
can
change
and
the
fixed
large
portion
that
can't
that's
going
to
stay
and
that's
a
little
less,
we
think
we're
going
to
get
a
little
bit
of
savings.
M
Again,
not
wanting
to
get
too
detailed
again.
You've
got
that
live
board
rate.
That's
broken
out
into
two
different
components:
the
base
that
very
small
portion
will
go
from
70
to
80
percent,
so
that's
an
increase,
but
it's
a
very
small
portion
again
of
that
fee.
The
spread
will
actually
be
reduced
from
nearly
0.6
percent
down
to
just
over
0.3
percent,
representing
a
total
savings
to
the
city
of
a
quarter
of
a
percent.
B
K
J
J
Could
I
just
mr
o'hara,
while
you're
while
you're
on
the,
could
I
just
ask
you
a
quick
question.
I've
had
several
I've
had
several
non-profits
and
others
call
me
in
the
past
few
days
and
say
they
find
the
the
budget
more
difficult
to
navigate
this
year,
especially
drilling
down
to
individual
line
items.
Is
there?
Is
there
something
different
about
the
way
it's
set
up
this
year
or
is
there?
Are
there
any
tips
or
recommendations
you
might
have
to
the
public,
so
they
can
get
all
the
information.
M
No
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
asking
that
question.
We
have
gotten
similar
feedback
and
again
it.
I
guess
anecdotally
will
depend
on
just
how
detailed
you
want
to
be.
What
we've
tried
to
do
is
provide
two
formats,
the
typical
format
that
almost
everybody's
used
to
including
myself,
and
that
is
the
printed
format
and
then
that
open
gov
program
format
which,
as
we
including
myself,
get
more
and
more
used
to
it.
I
think
we're
gonna,
I
think
we're
gonna
fall
in
love
with
it.
It
allows
so
many
more
inquiries
and
so
much
more
detail.
M
If
you're
inclined
to
go
that
route,
my
first
suggestion
would
be.
Please
call
me
or
my
office.
One
of
our
analysts
can
walk
you
through
that
open
gov
program.
Secondly,
if
you
go
on
our
website,
we've
got
the
for
lack
of
a
better
term.
Traditional
budget
out
there
with
the
pdf
that
would
typically
in
the
old
days,
would
typically
be
a
a
hard
copy
and
then
that
just
proceeds
right
along
with
the
table
of
contents.
So
we
understand
it
is
a
new
platform
again.
M
An
effort
at
increasing
transparency
both
to
candidly
internally
with
council
and
with
the
public,
is
a
great
deal
of
information
out
there.
So
I
can
understand
why
it
may
be
a
challenge.
J
M
A
Yes,
sir
council,
I
this
is
oceanwin
administrator
for
neighborhood
and
community
affairs.
I
submitted
a
memo
for
item
number
96.
I
wanted
to
know
if
you
have
any
questions.
C
Any
question
on
96:
you
know
mr
vatiscalca
you're
recognized.
I
Thank
you
very
much,
sir.
Just
a
brief
comment.
I
know
that
I
mentioned
villa
brothers
park.
We
had
the
special
discussion
last
week
and
how
I'd
like
to
get
that
completed
within
the
next
two
years
and
that
we
allocate
that
money
in
the
budget
to
finish
this
project.
But
having
said
that,
it
would
be
a
great
opportunity
to
expand
the
ada
accessibility,
especially
parking.
I
think
there's
one
ada
parking
spot
for
the
park.
I
I
believe
I
might
be
wrong,
but
I
think
there's
just
one
and
we
did
make
improvements
in
the
last
few
years,
so
the
entrance
to
the
park
off
armenia
makes
it
easy
because
there's
street
parking
there
and
I
think
we
can
just
expand
on
the
spaces
that
are
marked
handicapped
or
for
ada
accessibility.
I
It's
the
easiest
way
to
do,
and
it's
the
easiest
way
to
access
that
park
for
people
that
are
driving
in.
So
that's
really
it.
I
appreciate
the
memo
and
the
written
report
and
that's
that's
it.
Thank
you.
C
Director
went
out,
I
would,
I
would
ask
that
the
recreation
department
every
time
I
look
around
it's
a
item
of
vehicles
and
it'll
be
another
item,
I'm
hoping
that
we'll
get
to
the
point
that
we'll
say
be
able
to
come
to
this
council.
This
is
what's
going
to
complete
wheeler
and
that
we
have
a
number
to
work
with,
so
we
can
get
that
done
and
we
don't
get
all
the
phone
calls
from
those
folks
over
there,
because
I
know
they've
been
waiting
a
long
long
time.
They've
been
promised
a
long
long
time.
C
A
Yes,
sir,
and
to
your
point,
we
have
had
a
number
of
requests
over
the
years
and
what
we're
doing
is
that
we're
compiling
those
lists
to
get
to
make
sure
it's
a
comprehensive
list
and
that
we
have
the
costs
associated
with
the
repairs.
And
we
will
be
prepared
to
come
back
to
you
with
what
those
asks
are
in
the
associated
costs.
C
All
right,
mr
vieira
got
his
item
number
seven
out
of
the
way.
This
morning,
item
number
98.
N
The
noise
ordinance
that
council
first
heard
about
in
recommendations
during
the
april
22nd
2021
workshop
on
av
hours
of
operation
and
noise
and
distance
separation
with
me
this
afternoon
I
do
have
simone
savino
with
the
legal
department
and
also
miss
feely
is
on
the
line
as
well,
and
if
you
have,
if
we
could
take
a
few
brief
moments,
I
can
just
walk
you
through
the
recommendations
and
then
the
ordinance
that
is
before
you
so
council.
At
the
april,
22
21
2021
workshop
council
accepted
four
recommendations
from
staff.
N
N
N
N
Recommendation
number
three
was
for
changes
to
section
14-153
first
to
remove
the
channel
district
from
the
decibel
level
measurement
method.
You
recall
that
there
are
two
ways
that
we
measure
unreasonably
loud
and
raucous
noise
in
the
city.
One
is
through
the
decibel
level
meters
and
currently
those
decibel
measurement
measurements
apply
to
three
districts:
the
channel
district,
the
ebor
city,
historic
district
and
the
arena
district,
and
so
our
recommendation,
which
council
accepted,
was
to
remove
the
channel
district.
N
F
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
related
on
a
related
issue,
susan,
and
I
think
I
mentioned
this
to
carol
post
yesterday.
F
I
apologize,
I
didn't
call
you
on
it,
but
the
folks
over
in
in
armature,
the
folks
who
run
armature
have
requested
to
be
treated
well
to
to
be
specifically
addressed
in
the
noise
ordinance.
F
N
I
am
I
have.
I
have
spoken
to
to
mr
harden
about
that
proposal,
and
I-
and
I
did
let
him
know
that
at
the
time
that
we
talked
about
it
at
that
point,
we
didn't
have
any
direction
from
council
and
so.
F
Well,
I'm
not
really
sure
the
best
way
to
approach
it
today.
I
think,
as
long
as
we're
looking
at
tweaking
the
the
noise
ordinance
in
this
regard,
I
think
we
should
try
at
a
minimum
to
address.
F
F
You
have
any
suggestions
on
emotion
that
you
know
that
that
would
jibe
with
you
know
with
your
work
schedule
and
what
you
know,
what
the
direction
that
you
all
are
headed
right
now,
abby,
I
think,
is,
has
her
hand.
O
If
I
may
counsel
abby
feely
director
development
and
growth
management,
as
you
may
recall,
we
had
a
pretty
extensive
workshop
on
this
matter
and
even
had
opportunity
for
public
comment
at
that
time,
and
if
you
recall
even
further,
you
know
we
removed
the
channel
district
due
to
their
growing
residential
nature,
to
include
them
now,
as
outside
of
that
entertainment,
district
and
really
into
the
more
general
all
parts
of
the
city.
O
In
looking
at
just
an
initial
reaction,
I
mean
there
is
single-family
residential
that
directly
abuts
armature
works
in
that
area,
and
I
would
have
to
examine
it
further,
but
in
in
this
context
I
would
my
initial
reaction
would
be.
You
know
we
at
least
need
to
have
that
public
discussion
allow
those
residents
to
know
that
this
may
be
forthcoming
and
to
give
them
an
opportunity
to
participate
in
the
process,
as
that
was
not.
C
The
problem
I
have,
mr
ninfel
is
this
many
many
moons
ago.
Everybody
wanted
mixed
use
with
retail
and
entertainment,
and
you
got
it.
You
got
what
you
wanted
now
all
of
a
sudden
we're
getting
getting
big
now
we're
getting
residents
in
there.
So
now
we're
complaining
about
the
music,
the
dancing
everything
now.
If
we're
talking
about
amateur
ropes,
hell
downtown,
is
complaining
now
downtown.
C
You
know
we
look
at
this
side
of
downtown
can't
have
music,
because
it's
gonna,
the
music
will
be
amplified
on
the
buildings.
It
only
could
be
on
this
street
over
here,
where
it's
not
from
the
residents.
We
have
to
look
at
those
things
because
you're
sure,
as
armature
tells
you
that
I
guarantee
the
way
that
building
west
ham
you're
going
to
have
to
have
a
number
of
complaints
me
and
minnesota,
and
you
calling
saying
the
music's
too
loud.
C
Every
time
so
people
understand
when
they
want
to
buy
and
move
someplace,
they
need
to
understand
that
it
could
be
music,
it
could
be
live
music,
but
again,
business
always
have
to
be
mindful
of
how
loud
that
music
could
be.
But
I
think
you
need
to
look
at
when
you're
redesigning
or
doing
the
these
drawings
or
renderings.
We
need
to
know
where
you're
going
to
put
this
stuff
at
what
can
go
where
so
we
don't
go
and
run
into
this.
C
The
other
situation
I
have
is
that
you
look
at
I've,
got
two
or
three
music
stores
that
are
open
area
you
could
say,
and
the
music
blasted
all
day
long
and
until
late
evening
times,
I
got
miss
taylor's,
calling
me
right
now
constantly
in
reference
to
the
store
on
hillsboro
avenue
and
I've
gone
by
their
code,
which
I
don't
know
why
that
hasn't
gone
to
the
cold
wars
before
to
be
addressed.
You
know,
so
I
mean
these
are
some
issues
as
well.
C
So
I'm
just
saying
when
you,
when
we
look
at
this
ordinance,
we
need
to
be
clear
how
you're
going
to
cut
it.
Mr
d
felder,
because
I'm
telling
you,
if
you
do
that
with
armature
works,
downtown
is
going
to
be
saying
they
want
their
own
way.
So
we
need
to
find
how
we're
going
to
do
it
city-wide
to
say
what
entertainment
district,
what
entertainment
area
should
go
where
so,
it's
not
interfering
with
the
residents.
A
F
F
Waterworks
park
and
we
have
a
band
shell
there
and
we
have
our
own
city
events
there
in
the
band
show
facing
in
the
exact
same
direction
that
that
I
think
the
armature
folks
are
looking
to
do,
which
is
have
events
right
there
along
the
river,
with
music
and
entertainment
and
that's
kind
of
what
I
thought
was
the
whole
point
of
of
that
little.
F
You
know
the
building
and
and
and
that
sort
of
thing
in
regard
to
close
single-family
residents,
yeah,
I'm
familiar
where
they
are
they're
they're
about
five
six
blocks
up
the
hill.
You
know
are
there
on
the
other
side
of
those
buildings.
F
F
What
I'm
suggesting
is
is
that
we
look
at
it
that
we
explore
it,
that
we
have
conversations
with
the
folks
from
armature
who
are
running
this
and
who,
who
are
you,
know,
want
to
encourage
and
and
have
events
as
well
as
the
tampa
heights
community
and
the
single
family
folks
in
those
communities,
and
maybe
even
the
folks
who
are
renting
in
the
buildings,
although
I
would
think
that
again,
if
they're
rent,
if
they
came
to
those
buildings
and
they're
renting
in
those
buildings
that
they
kind
of
know
what
kind
of
district
they're
renting
in.
F
But
anyway,
I'm
just
trying
to
find
out
the
best
mechanism
to
explore
these
and
miss
philia.
If
you're
telling
me
that
that
we
shouldn't
do
it
hand
in
hand
with
item
98
and
the
and
the
and
these
other
items,
you
know
that
are
chugging
along,
I
guess
we
can
come
back
later
and
do
it
later.
I
just
thought
doing
it
all
at
once
made
sense.
C
F
What
is
it,
what
is
the
regulation
downtown?
Is
it?
Is
it
like
channel
side
or
is
it?
Is
it
like
the
rest
of
the
city.
P
P
Right,
that's
the
citywide
standard
and
I'll
just
provide
a
reminder
that
at
one
point
in
time,
downtown
was
within
the
decibel
as
late
as
2018.
It
was
included
within
14-153,
which
was
the
decibel
section,
is
the
decibel
section,
but
it
was
at
the
time
requested
to
be
moved
and
that's
that's
how
we
proceeded.
O
And
if
I
I
can
just
add
to
that
for
just
a
minute
simone
thanks
for
clarifying
that,
so
I
just
wanted
to
take
just
a
brief
step
back
on
on
how
we
got
to
the
ordinance
that's
before
you
today,
and
that
is
that
we
were
looking
to
create
a
more
predictable
and
understandable
standard.
As
there
have
been
a
lot
of
discussion
surrounding
outdoor
amplified,
sound
that
ran
with
alcoholic
beverage
permits
and
when
the
sound
was
occurring,
people
were
having
to
go
in
and
see.
Oh,
what
did
this
barn
lounge
get?
Oh,
what
did
they
get?
O
Oh
and
what
our
initial
recommendation
to
you
was.
Let's
do
this
city-wide
that
at
midnight
there
is
no
more
outdoor
amplified,
sound
people
can
be
in
their
homes,
they
it
can
be
quiet
and
they
can
know
what
to
expect
and
then
it
isn't
a
moving
target,
but
it's
a
more
understandable
standard.
O
So
that
was
one
of
our
first
recommendations
that
is
before
you
today,
and
the
second
was
those
two
entertainment
areas
with
ibor
and
the
arena
district
that
at
one
time
did
include
channel
district
and
now
much
like
the
cbd
is
being
moved
into
that
city-wide
standard
versus
the
decibels.
So
that's
where
we
are
today,
we
did.
You
know,
spend
considerable
amount
of
time
on
this.
O
Now
that
this
other
area
has
come
up,
I
mean
I
would
encourage
you
to
move
forward
on
what's
before
you
today,
in
keeping
with,
because
I
know
there
are
several
of
you
have
been
waiting
for
these
items
to
come
back
and
us
to
start
moving
toward
addressing
many
of
those
concerns
that
are
out
there
today
and
and
setting
this
standard.
So
if
you
would
like,
we
could
look
at
that
further
in
relation
or
outside
of
this
in
relation
to
the
heights
area.
O
As
you
know,
there's
one
general
wet
zoning
on
that
area
as
well,
but
there
there
are
on
palm
single
family
residences
and
some
others.
You
know
in
that
area
and
and
the
surrounding
area
and
much
like
you've
heard
you
know,
sound,
does
travel
so
I'd
like
an
opportunity
to
have.
You
know
a
more
comprehensive
look
at
what's
being
raised
today
in
relation
to
that
area
of
the
city
and
be
able
to
come
back
with
some
another.
O
You
know
a
more
kind
of
examined
recommendation
in
relation
to
that
area,
as
well
as
public
participation
and
and
some
feedback
there
from
those
residents.
Mr.
K
The
chairman,
along
your
terms
of
discussion,
like
now
around
the
hillsborough
river
on
the
west
side
right
now,
it's
all
vacant
correct
what
happens
when
that
develops,
which
is
going
to
start
construction
very
soon,
thousands
of
people
are
going
to
move
back
in
and
you
don't
have
no
complaints
now
because
there's
no
one
there.
However,
when
those
arrive
there
and
they're
there
comfortably
now
you
may
have
a
problem,
I'm
not
saying
you're
going
to
have.
You
may
have
a
problem,
so
it's
got
to
be
done.
City-Wide.
C
F
Well,
yeah,
I
know
I'm
I'm
fine.
It
looks
like
this
train
sort
of
left
the
station
and-
and
that's
that's
fine-
I
think
the
ideas
generally
are
good
abby.
Were
you
saying
that
and
I'm
trying
to
find
this
on
your
on
your
memo
or
your
proposal,
I'm
looking
I'm
looking
inside,
but
I'm
having
some
trouble
finding
it.
Are
you
saying
that
that
one
of
your
recommendations
is
a
change
chapter
27
so
or
or
is
it
changing
chapter
14.
O
So,
by
moving
forward
today
with
the
chapter
14,
placing
that
on
for
an
upcoming
first
reading,
that
will
now
set
a
standard
city-wide
for
outdoor
amplified
sound
at
midnight,
and
that
would
be
for
people
serving
alcohol
people
not
serving
alcohol.
It
doesn't
matter
at
midnight,
talent,
we
we
go
outside
town
goes
quiet
and
that
way,
when
there
is
a
complaint
and
tpd
arrives,
there's
no
discussion
as
to
oh.
Did
you
get
that
through
your
alcohol
or
not
throughout
work,
where
that
is
what
the
standard
would
be
so.
F
F
I
guess
my
only
other
question
is:
do
we
have
the
ability
to
waive
that
on
a
case-by-case
basis
like
if
somebody,
the
other
day
we
had
somebody
who
wanted
you
know
who
had
an
operation
underneath
the
crosstown
that
clearly,
you
know,
would
probably
have
no
impact
on
anybody
and-
and
you
know,
do
we
have
the
ability
to
wave
that
you
know
in
a
rezoning
or
in
a
wet
zone.
P
Simone
savino
legal
department,
this
what
as
abby
was
saying
this
would
operate
totally
independent
and
it's
a
it
would
be
a
code
section
that
is
applicable
citywide.
So
therefore,
I
don't
believe
it
would
be
something
that
could
be
waived
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
It
would
just
apply
to
all.
P
G
Mr
martin
shelby
city
council
attorney
just
also
just
from
a
an
enforcement
standpoint.
I
believe
the
the
uniformity
of
it
would
allow
easily
to
be
enforced
as
opposed
to
what
you
have
on
the
site
plans
right
now,
which
are
very
difficult
to
enforce,
because
it's
all
on
an
individual
basis.
And
I
don't
know
whether
I
see
him
as
feeling
nodding.
But
I
don't
know
whether
she
wants
to
address
so.
F
I
think
that's
a
good
point,
but
it
brings
up
another
point
that
I
think
needs
clarification
and
I'm
okay
with
that.
If
we
can't
waive
it,
then
you're
right,
it's
uniform,
but
then
it
brings
up.
Another
point
is:
if
we've
already
approved
this
with
specificity
on
site
plans,
is
that
an
exception
that
they're
that
they're
vested
with
at
you
know,
or
or
do
they
have
to
back
down
to
the
to
the
to
the
midnight,
regardless
of
what
their
site
plan
says?
And
I
think
that's
a
legal
question.
N
Councilmember
susan
johnsonville-
I
I
I
mean
if
memory
serves
me
correctly
and
I
don't
know
that
we've
done
a
survey
of
all
of
the
of
the
wet
zoning
or
av
permits
that
you've
approved.
But
typically
you
require
earlier
end
to
outdoor
amplified
sound
on
your
wet
zonings.
And
so
this
is
going
to,
I
think,
be
a
little
bit
more
lenient
than
what
you
typically
allow
under
av
permits
for
outdoor
amplified,
sound.
F
All
right
well
so,
in
other
words,
if
if
if
the
existing
pd
said
you
know,
noise
will
be
controlled
under
under
chapter
14.
K
I'm
miss
miss
feely.
You
know
there
are
going
to
be
some
people
who
say
well
now
you're
ruining
our
fun
and
hypothetically
four
green
fields
wants
to
have
a
st
paddy's
day
party.
They
can
still
ask
for
a
special
use
permit
to
have
the
amplified
music
for
that
one
day
and
and
that
kind
of
gets
them
around
this,
and
I'm
I'm
only
using
them
as
an
example.
K
O
And
I
do
not
believe
that
a
special
event
permit
would
would
exempt
that.
The
thing
I
would
say
to
council
is
in
order
to
continue
on
our
path
of
being
uniform
and
predictable.
If
you
have
or
are
desiring
that
on
certain
days
of
the
year,
be
it
gasparilla
super
bowl.
You
know
cinco
de
mayo,
saint
patrick's
day,
which
you've
done
on
many
of
your
alcoholic
beverage.
If
you
want
to
extend
I've,
seen
this
done
through
much
of
my
work
in
private
sector
and
alcoholic
beverage,
there
are
codes
that
say
on
these
specified
years.
O
It
could
go
to
1am
or
if
that
were
the
pleasure
of
city
council.
That
could
be
an
amendment
that
could
be
made
and
brought
back
as
part
of
the
ordinance.
But
again
I
would
hesitate
to
start
establish
the
bar
and
then
start
moving
the
bar.
You
know
you
could
still
have
your
sound
inside
after
midnight,
but
the
intent
is
that
after
midnight
residents
throughout
the
city,
no
matter
where
you
are
have
the
opportunity
to
be
in
their
homes
and
not
be
impacted
by
outdoor
amplified,
sound.
K
K
C
K
Could
be
inside
of
a
tent,
it
could
be
inside
of
a
building
it.
Could
you
know
I'm
trying
to
be
what's
coming
next,
and
I
understand
what
they're
saying
if
you
have
a
standard
that
everything's
going
to
close
at
12
and
then
you're
going
to
have
different,
different
different
amplified
music
by
coming
to
the
council
and
saying
yes,
then
in
essence,
you
haven't
changed.
Anything
12
o'clock
is
when
you
can
have
before
midnight
right
at
midnight.
You
can't
have
no
more
amplified
music
outside
correct.
O
Your
options
would
be
you
could
codify
it
to
allow
that
for
everyone
on
those
dates
till
one
o'clock,
like
new
year's
eve,
I
mean
that
would
be
at
the
pleasure
council.
What
we
are
recommending
to
you
is
midnight
365
days
of
the
year,
and
that
is
you
know,
with
the
intent
to
provide
our
residents
and
visitors
with
that
quality
of
life
and
peacefulness
to
be
in
their
homes
or
in
their
hotels
or
wherever
it
is
at
that
time.
O
And
then
you
know
if
it
does
not
correspond
necessarily
with
the
hours
of
operation
of
of
a
an
establishment.
So
the
hours
of
operation
may
still
be
until
one
o'clock
two
o'clock,
but
after
midnight,
there's
no
more
outdoor
amplified
sound.
N
And
susan
johnson
belize
just
to
expand
on
that.
If
I
could
call
council's
attention
again
to
section
six
of
the
draft
ordinance
where
we've
created
that
new
section
14-164
and
it
prohibits
out,
amplified
sound
from
the
outdoor
area
of
any
property,
so
whether
it's
under
a
patio
or
a
tent,
the
intent
was,
if
it's
outdoors,
then
out
amplified
sound,
is
prohibited
from
those
areas
after
midnight.
Thank
you.
I
G
Mr
chairman,
you
recognize,
I
think
it
should
it
may
go
without
saying,
but
just
a
reminder
to
that.
If
council
does
choose
to
go
forward
with
this
and
it's
put
on
the
agenda,
you
will
have
the
opportunity
at
first
reading
to
have
public
comment
during
general
public
comment
before
it
comes
back
for
a
public
hearing
and
an
adoption
public
hearing,
so
you'll
have
the
opportunity
for
public
input
before
you
adopt
it.
P
Simone
savino,
on
behalf
of
legal
department,
I
just
wanted
to
add
a
couple
of
additional
pieces
of
information:
we're
not
manipulating
or
changing
section
14-158
of
the
noise
ordinance
that
currently
provides
for
some
very
specific
exemption,
and
so
I
just
want
to
state
for
the
record
here
that
we
actually
in
regards
to
councilman
mataskalko's
question
subsection.
Three
of
that
ordinance
actually
speaks
specifically
to
activities
in
the
fields,
grounds
or
facilities
of
any
schools,
sporting
arena,
stadium
or
sports
complex.
So
that's
why
we
haven't
seen
or
been
faced
with
any
specific
noise
challenges.
They're.
P
P
G
The
administration,
I
believe
the
legal
department
in
its
memo
is
requesting
whether
council
or
the
the
department
where
the
council
wishes
to
have
this
go
forward
through
the
process
of
having
it
placed
on
a
future
agenda
for
first
reading.
Consideration
is
that
correct
ms
feely.
K
C
Right,
mr
miranda
has
made
a
motion,
mr
cetera
ii,
all
in
favor
all
right
get
it
folks.
G
Will
that
be
processed
through
sire,
ms
savina
is
it'll
just
be
processed
through
sire
it'll
show
up
on
first
reading
at
a
future
agenda.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,
yes,
that's
correct!
Thank
you
all
right.
Q
Q
We
are
all
here
to
answer
any
questions
with
regards
to
this
agenda
item.
The
request
was
from
councilman
goodes
with
regards
to
the
public
nuisance
and
pavement
board,
and
also
which
also
serves
as
the
code
enforcement
board.
I
believe
the
questions
revolved
around
the
role
of
the
public
nuisance
abatement
board
and
whether
the
public
nuisance
statement
board,
which
also
serves
as
a
code
enforcement
board,
could
essentially
if
there
was
any
more
activities
that
they
could
participate
in
or
any
other
roles
that
they
could
function
in.
Q
Q
Q
38
investigations
were
conducted
where
a
notice
of
violation
was
issued
by
the
tampa
police
department
of
those
35
properties
came
into
compliance
and
the
nuisances
were
believed
to
be
evaded.
The
three
remaining
cases
resulted
in
cases
being
brought
before
the
public
nuisance
abatement
board,
and
one
case
is
still
presently
pending
before
the
public
nuisance
payment
board.
If
there
are
any
questions
with
regards
to
the
public
nuisance
abatement
board,
captain
blasioli
and
officer
elmore
are
present
to
help
answer
any
of
those
questions.
I.
C
Think
the
problem
is
that
the
public
doesn't
know
the
difference
between
a
nuisance
abatement
and
the
code
enforcement
board,
but
yet
you're
telling
me
they're
one
and
the
same,
so
I
think
that's
the
confusion
with
the
public
of.
Why
is
this
one
and
the
same
if
it's
characterized
in
our
code
as
a
nuisant
abatement
board,
and
you
have
a
code
enforcement
board
to
me.
That's
two
boards.
When
I
look
at
it,
so
that's
the
confusion
with
the
public.
Why
is
that
the
same?
And
then
we
look
at
the
cases?
C
C
You
know
so
why
not
some
of
these
code
violations
coming
to
the
code
enforcement
board
to
be
looked
at
or
heard
or
sanctioned,
because
I've
got
a
lady,
miss
taylor,
who's
been
calling
every
year
for
two
years
since
I've
been
in
office.
I
bought
live
music
from
that
radio
place
over
there
across
the
street.
I
sat
outside
my
car.
I
heard
it
I
called
freeman
over.
He
heard
it
so
I'm
like.
C
Q
And
I'm
happy
to
try
to
answer
that
so
currently,
right
now
we
have
special
magistrates
serving
in
the
place
of
our
code
enforcing
board.
Over
time
we
have
found
that
special
magistrates
have
been
a
very
effective
process
at
handling
code
violations
and
that's
where
the
majority
of
our
code
violations
are
taken.
Code
violations
can
also
be
taken
to
county
court
and
a
lot
of
violations
are
taken
to
county
court
either
for
civil
infractions
or
for
in
the
county
criminal
court,
if
deemed
appropriate.
Q
The
code
enforcement
board
and
the
public
nations
abatement
board
are
in
fact,
two
separate
roles.
It's
just
the
same
board.
The
public
nations
abatement
board
was
established
by
statute
authority
and
that
statutory
authority
we,
the
city
council,
decided
the
public
nuisance
pavement
board
would
serve
as
the
code
enforcement
board
or
the
code
enforcement
board
actually
would
serve
as
a
public
nuisance
pavement
board,
and
so
over
time,
the
code
enforcement
board's
role
has
sort
of
been
diminished
based
on
the
analysis
of
staff.
Q
That
magistrates
were
a
better,
more
effective
way
of
handling
a
lot
of
code
violations.
Q
C
Q
It
requires
a
lot
of
investigation,
a
lot
of
work,
a
lot
of
referral,
referrals
start
by
the
police
department,
the
officers
on
the
street
to
the
correct
unit,
and
then
it
gets
fully
investigated.
A
complaint
gets
issued.
So
these
these
are
even
though
there's
not
a
high
number.
The
cases
that
go
in
front
of
the
board
are
litigated
and
are
often
in
front
of
that
board.
Q
For
a
period
of
a
year
they
have
one
year
jurisdiction
and
that
board
meets
on
a
on
a
you
know,
fairly
regular
basis
to
look
at
the
cases
that
are
brought
there.
So,
when
they're
brought
there,
I
believe,
they're
highly
effective.
The
problem
is
a
lot
of
the
public
would
want
to
bring
other
cases
that
don't
necessarily
qualify
for
that
board,
but
maybe
they
should
qualify
for
another
board.
Q
So
what
we're
proposing
and
what
we're
working
with
keith
o'connor
on
is
creating
an
affidavit
online,
where
the
public
would
be
able
to
complete
an
affidavit
requesting
a
certain
nuisance
property
be
looked
at
based
on
the
sworn
complaint
by
the
person
online.
It
would
be
sent
to
code
enforcement
to
look
at
the
property
if
they
deemed
that
there
is
a
violation
based
on
the
complaint.
Q
They
could
issue
a
notice
of
violation
to
bring
it
in
front
of
the
code
and
portion
board
and
that
would
be
issued
to
the
property
owner
and
the
property
owner
then
would
be
brought
to
the
code
enforcement
board
to
consider
whether
that
property
is
a
nuisance
and
whether
there's
anything
that
can
be
done.
I.
C
C
So
I'm
glad
that
you're
you're
looking
at
now
and
some
of
these
non-criminal
cases
or
these
smaller
cases,
usually
when
people
get
that
kind
of
notice,
I
got
to
go
before
the
board,
I'm
going
to
clean
my
act
up
now.
You
know,
so
I
think
it's
a
good
idea
that
you
know
that
we've
got
we're
going
to
try
to
put
a
system
together
to
help
our
officers
out
as
well,
that
there
is
a
way
that
you
can
make
your
complaint
not
anonymously,
but
make
your
complaint
known
in
that
way.
It's
all
legal!
C
It's
there
we
go
out,
we
look
at
it
and
it
was
about.
We
didn't
bring
it
to
the
board
and
let
the
board
look
at
it,
and
now
we
have
a
legitimate
what
I
feel
you
have
a
legit
boy,
but
you
have
a
boy
now
who
feels
they're
working
for
the
people
and
the
people
feel
like
they're
getting
services
now.
So
I'm
glad
we're
going
to
look
into
that.
I
see
mr
maniscalco
shaking
his
head
over
there
and
I'm
going
to
recognize
him.
You're
recognized,
sir.
I
I
And
if
I
remember,
we
maybe
acted
in
that
role
twice
in
three
years,
and
I
remember
one
of
the
cases
it
was
a
motel
on
nebraska,
but
other
than
that
it
was
generally
quiet
and
back
then
you
know
we
would
meet
almost
monthly
and
but
there
wasn't
much
going
on
you
think,
a
city,
this
big.
When
we
always
say
we
don't
have
enough
code
enforcement
officers,
you
would
think
would
be
overloaded,
but
these
boards
generally
it's
quiet.
I
So
I
understand
what
mr
schmidt
is
proposing
and
perhaps
that's
a
better
route
to
take,
because
you
know
we
get
complaints
in
our
offices
and
why
isn't
this
looked
at
or
that
done,
and
perhaps
this
would
help
the
process,
but.
K
C
Well,
schmidt,
I'm
hoping
that
you
guys
will
bring
something
back
to
us
sooner
rather
than
later.
We
have
a
lot
of
issues
going
on
in
the
city,
and
I
think
this
will
kind
of
help
us
a
little
bit.
Our
constituents
will
be
a
little
bit
more
happier.
They
now
have
an
outlet
to
vent
their
frustrations
and
actually
see
something
getting
done
and
think
that
we're
not
doing
our
job
or
the
city's
not
doing
their
job.
Q
Yes,
sir,
we
think
we
think
keith
o'connor's
present
and
we
believe
we
can
get
this
somewhere
between
30
90
days.
We
should
be
able
to
draft
an
affidavit
and
get
something
online
and
figure
out
the
processes
needed
to
get
this
rolling.
Q
Good
afternoon
council
keith
o'connor
manager,
neighborhood
enhancement.
I
agree
with
everything.
A
That
the
mike
schmidt
said-
and
I
just.
A
Hearing
the
cases
they
all
go
to
the
special
magistrate
that
happened
about
eight
years
ago,
but
we
are
in
favor
of
trying
something
to
get
to
get
use
out
of
the
board.
Since
it's
already
seated,
we
could
get
these
cases
to
go
there
and
the
cases
he's
talking
about
that
involved,
multiple
citizens
and
they
would
collect
the
evidence
like
a
barking
dog
where
they
have
the
evidence
on
their
cell
phone
and
they
want
to
get
their
voice
heard
and
they
can
come
before
the
board.
C
P
All
right
legal
department-
I
just
wanted
to
second
what
mr
o'connor
just
mentioned-
that
in
terms
of
code
enforcement
every
wednesday
we
have
hearings
all
day
and
I'm
there
personally.
So
as
far
as
code
enforcement,
special
magistrates
go,
they
have
heavy
agendas.
The
cases
have
just
been
previously
moved
from
code
enforcement
forward
to
the
special
magistrate.
I
don't
want
to
harp
on
that
too
much,
but
I
do
want
you
guys
to
know
that
they're
absolutely
being
heard.
C
Yeah
we
understand
that
I've
come
in
and
I've
seen
the
the
line
in
here
reference
to
that
simone,
so
we're
not
debating
that
I'm
looking
at
those
other
little
smaller
nuisance,
small
things
that
could
come
probably
coming
before
that
board
and
people
would
get
a
little
fear
to
say,
okay.
Well,
I
need
to
straighten
my
act
up
and
and
move
along,
so
I
do
understand
we're
working,
but
you
know
sometimes
the
public.
You
know
they
they
they
want
a
little
bit
more
sometimes,
and
sometimes
we
got
to
give
it
to
them.
C
C
All
right,
well
we'll
wait
to
hear
back
from
you.
Maybe
30
90
days.
Q
R
Thank
you.
Can
you
hear
me?
We
got
you,
we
see
you,
okay,
all
right!
Thank
you.
So
much
council.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
time
today
and
allowing
me
to
come
before
you
I'm
to
discuss
this
item.
This
is
an
item
regarding
text,
amendment
cycles
and
I
do
believe
I
have
a
powerpoint
that
was
provided.
If
that
could
be
brought
up.
Please.
C
Mr
shelby,
could
you
check
and
see
if
cttv
has
got
mrs
sean
doctor's
presentation?
Thank
you,
sir.
R
This
request
was
made
in
an
effort
to
address
council's
concern,
privately
initiated
and
publicly
initiated
text
amendments
and
having
the
ability
to
be
able
to
process
an
amendment
outside
of
a
text.
Amendment
cycle
next
slide.
Please
in
may
staff
presented
an
option
to
counsel
and
one
was
to
provide
two
publicly
initiated
cycles
and
another
was
to
provide
two
privately
initiated
cycles.
R
Please
and
council
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
just
take
a
second
just
to
take
a
step
back
regarding
the
current
process
and,
what's
currently
in
the
code.
Currently,
when
text
amendments
are
processed,
there
is
confusion
regarding
their
request,
and
this
may
be
regarding
the
type
of
request,
whether
it
is
a
privately
initiated
or
a
publicly
initiated
request.
Also,
there's
sometimes
this
confusion
regarding
the
cycle
that
the
request
is
run
with.
R
So
in
an
effort
what
staff
has
tried
to
do
with
what
we're
bringing
before
you
today
is
to
actually
just
bring
some
clarity
to
that
process,
so
staff's
initial
recommendation
of
the
two
public
processes
and
then
the
two
private
processes
that
was
presented
to
you
back
in
may
at
that
workshop
next
slide.
Please.
R
Based
on
council's
direction,
thank
you.
Based
on
council's
direction,
public
outreach
was
held
that
public
outreach
was
conducted
in
the
form
of
a
public
information
meeting
session
and
that
was
to
introduce
the
idea
to
the
public.
Receive
feedback
from
the
public
staff
came
back
to
council
on
reporting
back
the
results
of
that
session
after
that
meeting
through
discussions
with
councilman
dean,
felder
and
staff,
we
are
here
before
you
bringing
the
option
to
you
today,
which
we
believe
would
address
council's
concerns
regarding
the
processing
of
amendments
next
slide.
Please.
R
What
we're
looking
to
provide,
counsel
or
we're
looking
to
provide
consistency
and
to
simplify
the
process
and
the
way
to
address
that
is
to
provide
two
public
cycles,
so
that
would
be
two
cycles
that
would
contain
publicly
initiated
amendments
and
also
to
incorporate
and
provide
a
mid-cycle
amendment,
and
this
would
give
an
option
to
address
those
critical
strategic
initiatives
and
that
will
be
available
if
needed
and
those
would
be
items
that
could
not
wait
for
the
long
cycle
next
slide.
Please.
R
So
the
intent
is
to
hold
the
two
public
cycles.
This
would
allow
for
requests
to
be
submitted
to
city
council
or
for
processing.
As
directed
by
the
code
administrator
currently,
council,
we
have
neighborhood
associations
and
neighborhood
organizations
who
would
like
to
submit
a
private
initiated
text
amendment
and,
of
course,
there
is
a
fee
associated
with
that.
Sometimes
they
cannot
pay
the
fee.
R
What
would
happen
to
this
process?
Is
those
organizations
or
even
a
private
member
of
the
public
can
submit
through
council
and
based
upon
council's
direction
to
staff?
It
would
be
processed
that
way
you
can
see
from
our
request
that
we're
also
allowing,
of
course,
the
time
as
I
mentioned,
we're
allowed
out
of
cycle
request
in
that
way.
Council
is
not
waiting
on
that
next
cycle
to
submit
a
change
to
the
code
and
that
is
currently
not
available
and
not
allowed
in
the
current
code.
R
R
This
is
a
proposal
to
counsel
and
we're
waiting
on
direction
from
council,
but
I
would
like
you
to
know
that
staff
is
prepared
to
start
processing
these
changes
immediately.
If
it
is
council's
desire,
just
keep
it
in
mind
that
we
still
have
to
conduct
public
outreach,
so
we
would
still
have
to
hold
a
public
information
meeting
session.
R
F
Okay
to
to
direct
staff
to
move
forward
with
staff
recommendation
and
the
staff
timeline
as
presented
to
us
by
ms
dock.
Q
C
G
F
F
F
R
Good
evening
again,
chairman
and
council
lashawn
dock
again
with
city
planning
council
item
101
is
a
privately
initiated
text
amendment
the
applicant
is
steve
michelini
and
john
long
in
this.
This
request
was
heard
before
council
at
workshop,
and
this
was
in
june
and
council
directed
the
applicant
at
that
time
to
conduct
public
outreach
and
the
applicant
is
available
and
I
believe
steve
is
online
and
he
is
ready.
He
is
going
to
review
the
public
outreach
that
he
completed
and
then
also
review
his
request
with
you
and
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
steve
mcgelini.
R
S
Good
afternoon,
council
I'm
on
the
second
floor,
so
we
have
a
powerpoint
presentation.
That's
that's
queued
up,
but
before
we
start,
I
would
like
to
advise
you
that
item
number
eight
and
nine,
which
was
the
east
tampa
overlay
and
the
west
tampa
overlay
districts
both
of
those
text.
Amendments
have
been
removed
from
consideration,
so
we
have
one
two.
Three,
four
remaining
requests
for
text
amendments
for
requesting
that
the
council
approve-
and
this
is
approval
to
to
move
forward.
It'll
still
come
back
to
you.
S
S
S
S
Okay,
the
first
request
is
the
calculation
for
buildings
within
a
and
a
typically
an
apartment
or
a
townhouse
style
project.
This
does
not
alter
in
any
respect
the
side,
yard,
setbacks
or
the
front
or
the
rear
yard
setbacks
for
any
of
the
buildings.
S
So
what
we
sat
down
and
talked
to
the
city
staff
about
was
to
establish
a
standard
setback
which
would
be
15
feet:
minimum
separation
between
buildings
within
a
complex
and
obviously
that
if
there
were
other
considerations,
it
would
be
more
than
that.
But
it's
a
minimum
of
a
15
feet
of
separation
between
existing
between
proposed
buildings.
S
Again,
this
does
not
affect
any
of
the
adjacent
property
setbacks
or
height.
It
has
nothing
to
do
with
any
of
that.
Okay,
now
we're
on
the
second
request,
which
is
the
official
standard
to
amend
the
building
setback.
The
height
regulations
regarding
rm24
rm24
is
the
only
zoning
district
that
has
a
30
foot
height
restriction.
S
S
S
S
These
are
typically
smaller
lots,
but
that
requires
that
the
parking,
the
additional
visitor
parking
space
it
will
take
up
green
space
and
it
it
allows
what
it's
doing
is
making
you
request:
a
waiver
for
green
space
and
paying
into
the
replacement
fund
for
green
spaces,
we're
requesting
that
the
visitor
parking
for
duplexes
be
eliminated
and
that
anything
over
two
units
would
would
require
to
have
a
visitor
space,
but
two
units
or
less
would
not,
and
it
has
been
becoming
a
problem
with
the
available
space
that
these
lots
have
when
you're
already
providing
four
spaces
for
each
each
of
the
units.
S
S
A
multi-family
townhouse
style
projects
several
years
ago,
the
the
code
was
changed
to
require
that
all
townhouse
projects
that
the
doors
face
a
right
away.
If
you
have
a
courtyard,
then
those
doorways
would
face
an
internal
courtyard
which
is
historically
another
method
of
achieving
interior
green
space.
It
also
would
provide.
S
This
again
would
not
affect
any
of
the
adjacent
property
owners.
It
simply
means
that
you
would
walk
through
a
gateway.
It
doesn't
affect
the
addressing.
It
will
not
affect
life
safety
or
for
fire
protection.
It
hasn't.
It
will
not
be
adversely
affecting
anything
again.
Staff
is
supporting
this
and
we
believe
it's
a
it's
a
minor
modification.
S
K
S
We
we've
eliminated
those
two,
mr
miranda,
the
east
hamp
and
the
west
tampa
overlay.
There
was,
they
need
more
work
and
east
tampa
just
got
some
new
administration,
as
well
as
the
west.
Tampa
cras
and
they'd
asked
us
to
pull
those
so
that
we
could
study
them
further.
So
we're
not
we're
not
considering
them.
C
East
tampa
has
the
new
manager,
but
eastham
also,
I
didn't
know
until
recently
had
paid
for
a
text
amendment
and
it
was
never
completed
or
done.
I
think
now
they
have
some
people
now
that
come
on
board
that
are
that
really
know
what
they're
doing
and
understand
about
overlays
and
so
forth
that
they're
gonna
be
working
with
mr
mcrae
to
kind
of
move
that
forward
now
in
the
right
direction.
C
So
I'm
glad
that
that
that's
not
on
the
table
this
time,
no.
S
One
of
the
things
that
I
wanted
to
mention
to
council
is
that
all
of
these
amendments
started
over
two
years
ago
and,
as
you
know,
there's
been
a
lot
of
changes
in
administration
and
how
these
various
projects
were
were
administered
and,
quite
honestly,
some
of
the
the
as
mr
gootz
had
pointed
out.
Some
of
the
deadlines
have
been
missed
and
we
were
asked
to
include
them
in
our
petition.
K
I
see
here
is:
let
me
visit
the
parking
for
duplex
only
so
then
how
many
spaces
are
each
duplex
going
to
have
one
or
two.
S
F
Mr
mick
laney
just
to
follow
up
on
that.
When
we
talk
about
duplexes,
there
are
some
duplexes
that
are
the
old
school
duplexes
that
that
don't
have
any
indoor
parking
at
all.
Isn't
that
in
that
correct,
miss
dock
I
mean
I'm
not
saying
they
don't
have
parking,
but
they
don't
have
covered
parking.
They
you
know
they.
They.
S
S
Right,
this
only
affects
new
construction.
It's
it's
not
retroactive
to
existing
construction
and.
F
No,
I
know
it's
just
new
construction.
My
point
is,
I
remember
we
had
a
case,
I
don't
know
within
the
last
year
it
was
over
in
east
tampa
out
toward
50th
street
and
it
was
it
was
an
old
school
duplex
and
the
issue,
and
I
think
it
was
a
pd
and
it
and
they
were
building
it
new,
but
it
was
an
old
school
duplex
and
and
they
had
some
parking
issues-
and
I'm
just
wondering
I'm
just
wondering
lashawna
is
that
are
we?
Are
we
talking
about
that
type
of
duplex
or
just
these
townhome
duplexes.
R
T
A
R
F
R
S
The
only
thing
I
was
referring
to
was
the
drive.
The
driveway
itself
serves
as
a
parking
area
for
two
cars,
and
you
still,
you
still
have
the
ability,
if
somebody's
going
through
a
pd,
they
could
still
ask
you
going
to
city
council
for
a
waiver
of
the
design,
but
this
this
amendment
would
be
for
those
going
straight
to
permitting
that
wouldn't
be
going,
wouldn't
be
involved
in
in
a
in
a
rezoning
process.
But
it
would
also
show
up
on
a
zoning
report
that
you're
not
meeting
that
if
they
were
asking
to
waive
it.
F
Well,
a
lot
of
these
neighborhoods
are
already
complaining
about.
You
know.
If
it's.
If
it's
traditionally
been
a
house,
the
house
gets
torn
down
now,
there's
you
know
a
quote:
duplex,
basically
a
side-by-side
townhome
that
gets
put
on
there
and
then
they
say
well,
you
know,
they've
got
family
they've
got
kids,
they
don't
have
enough
parking
spaces,
and
now
we're
saying
we
want
to
eliminate
the
guest
space
requirement.
I'm
sort
of
surprised
to
see
staff
quote
support
out
on
the
right-hand
side
of
that
miss
feely.
O
So
I
just
want
to
abby
philly
development
and
growth
management.
I
just
want
to
speak
to
a
couple
of
those
items
now,
as
lashawn
mentioned,
this
would
be
for
any
product
that
is
two
units
for
the
shared
center
wall,
so
in
theory,
they're
required
to
two
spaces,
a
piece
as
mr
mickelini
mentioned.
It's
you
know.
If
you
have
two
spaces
in
a
garage
and
two
spaces
on
a
parking
pad,
then
each
unit
would
have
four
spaces.
O
As
you
are
very
well
aware,
there
are
different
types
of
styles
that
these
units
come
in,
that
you
were
just
speaking
to
and
they
are
not
required
necessarily
to
have
that
parking
pad.
So
if
they
did
provide
two
spaces,
it
could
be
in
the
garage
and
then
there
would
not
necessarily
have
to
be
four
spaces.
So
I
don't.
O
So
if
lashawn
owned
one
unit
and
I
owned
one
unit
and
then
there
was
required
a
visitor
space,
you
know:
where
does
the
visitor
space
go?
We've
run
into
this
in
the
past,
where
it's
kind
of
an
oddity
related
to
the
semi-detached
type
of
structure.
So
I
don't
think
I
think
it's.
It
hasn't
been
as
problematic
as
when
you
get
to
the
town
homes
that
are
three
to
eight
units
where
you
now
owe
you
know
a
couple
spaces
and
there
is
no
guest
parking,
so
you
know
it
does
show
that
we're
in
support.
O
I,
I
don't
think
it
is
that
problematic
from
that
standpoint,
but
I
just
don't
want
to
you
know
misconstrue
any
expectations
related
to
well.
It
would
run
with
this,
but
it
wouldn't
run
with
that.
If
it
is
a
duplex
by
definition,
shared
wall
in
the
middle
two
units,
then
it
would
be
applicable
to
that.
S
If
I
could
add
to
this,
if,
if
as
long
as
you're
meeting
the
code
for
the
front
yard
setback,
you
have
the
space
between
the
edge
of
the
driveway
from
the
from
the
property
line
to
the
edge
of
the
of
the
garage,
you
have
at
least
20
feet,
which
is
a
minimum
required
for
driveway
parking.
So
you
you
would,
you
would
have
the
the
space
for
the
two
additional
spaces,
two
additional
parking
areas.
That's
why
I
said
you
would
have
four
and
whether
you
had
visitors
or
not.
S
S
I
can
go
through
the
other
slides,
but
I've
summarized
them.
I
think
accurately
and
as
I
said
that
we
we
did
work
with
staff
for
quite
a
while
to
obtain
and
support
for
each
of
these
requests.
So
we're
asking
city
council
to
to
please
make
the
motion
necessary
to
forward
this
on.
So
we
can
continue
the
process.
R
So,
council
lashawn
dock
with
city
planning-
I
just
want
to
clarify,
so
we
have
a
total
of
four
items
which
would
move
forward
what
we
see
on
the
screen
here.
We
have
item
number
one
number,
five
number
six
and
number
seven,
and
this
would
serve
as
this
is
a
follow-up,
a
continuance
from
the
initial
workshop.
R
K
All
right
so
move
to
make
this
go
forward.
Yes,
okay,.
F
S
F
C
All
right,
let's
do
the
main
motion
move,
will
continue.
Item
number
102.
Second,
on
that
stay
with
this
mascara
all
in
favor
any
pose
all
right.
Let's
continue
september.
A
I
Chairman,
we
did
receive
a
a
written
report,
but
there's
also
a
recommendation
on
this,
and
I
wanted
to
move
to
accept
the
recommendations
made
by
the
legal
department.
It's
all
in
the
in
the
report.
G
103.
martin
shelby
city
council
attorney
is
is
the
recommendation
to
bring
it
back
for
first
reading
consideration
or.
I
C
T
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much.
I'm
here
today
to
provide
a
brief
overview
of
the
city's
limited
legal
authority
to
regulate
small
wireless
facilities,
sometimes
referred
to
as
5g
in
the
public
right-of-way.
T
I
provided
city
council
with
a
memorandum
dealing
with
most
of
the
restrictions
placed
on
local
authorities
that
are
preempted
by
the
florida's
advanced
wireless
infrastructure,
deployment
act
and
the
federal
government's
communications
act.
The
memo
also
addresses
the
city's
current
ordinance
and
our
requirements
for
permit
applications.
T
T
K
I
thank
you
very
much,
mr
chair.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
report
again.
I
know
that
the
people
of
tampa
are
tired
of
me
saying
this,
but
this
is
preemption
by
our
our
state
government
and
it's
not
our
hands
that
are
tied.
Ladies
and
gentlemen,
it's
your
hands
that
are
tied.
I
don't
know
if
you
were
for
against
this
type
of
thing.
However,
if
you're
concerned
about
it,
I
please
suggest
that
you
write
your
state
representatives,
your
state
senators,
and
tell
them
that
we
want
tampa
to
have
home
rule.
G
Shelby
you're
recognized.
Thank
you.
Are
you
complete
on
this
item?
I
just
didn't
want
to
interrupt
one.
Are
you?
Are
you
still
on
10
104?
Are
you
moving
on.
C
K
C
All
right,
mr
miranda's
movement,
mr
randa
scott,
was
second
all
in
favor.
All
right.
All
right
opposed
question
kerry.
Mr.
G
Chevy
you're
recognized
I've
been
asked
by
the
legal
department
to
ask
council
to
reconsider
item
103
on
the
definition
of
the
commercial
vehicle.
I've
been
informed
that
september
30th
is
not
enough
time
to
do
that.
I
believe
they
say
it
has
to
be
workshopped,
not
with
council.
G
I
don't
believe
at
this
point,
but
it
does
have
to
go
to
the
planning,
commission
etc
to
go
through
the
process
before
it
comes
back,
so
would
would
it
be
appropriate
for
you,
then,
to
ask
that
that
this
be
process
to
be
brought
back
through
sire?
After
present
presentation
to
the
planning
commission.
I
That's
fine,
so
I
make
a
motion
to
rescind
my
motion
of
taking
this
out
to
first
reading
and
I
think
I
chose
september
30th
so
I'll
resend.
My
motion
second.
G
C
B
God,
no
thank
you.
I,
mr
shelby
just
covered
it
for
me.
Thank
you
so
much
that
was.
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
clear,
because
it's
a
chapter
27
change.
It's
a
amendment
to
chapter
27,
your
land
development
code.
All
such
changes
have
to
go
to
the
planning
commission
before
they
can
be
adopted
by
city
council.
So
we
obviously
couldn't
accomplish
that
before
september.
30Th.
I
All
right
move
to
transmit
to
the
planning
commission,
so
it
it
goes
to
the
the
traditional
channels
and
then
we'll
get
this
done.
What's.
I
C
G
Council
on
august
24th,
you
received
a
memo
from
ursula
richardson
regarding
the
fact
that
on
july,
29th
city
council
made
a
motion
to
open
the
appointment
to
nomination
process
for
a
city
council
selection
for
the
citizen,
police
review
board,
the
crb,
and
you
set
the
application
deadline
for
friday
september
3rd
2021,
and
just
want
to
remind
council
and
the
public
that
that
is
available
through
the
city's
website.
The
application
and
you
can
obtain
that
the
deadline
again
is
friday
september
3rd
2021,
it's
coming
up
a
week
from
tomorrow.
G
It
would
be
now
you
set
the
selection
date
for
october
27th
2021.
Today,
council
approved
the
naacp
nomination
and
to
prevent
delaying
the
training
and
other
prerequisites
for
service
on
the
crb.
The
legal
department
is
asking
the
city
council
to
make
a
motion
to
move
the
selection
date
from
what
is
presently
set
out
by
city
council
october
7th,
and
they
suggested
a
couple
of
dates.
One
of
them
is
a
workshop
date
on
september
23rd.
G
The
other
one
I
think,
is
better
for
council,
but
it
would
be
at
501
pm
as
the
first
item
on
the
evening
meeting
of
september
9th
2021.
That's
a
cra
day
during
the
day
and
this
process
would
be,
I
guess,
first
on
the
agenda.
If
council
wishes
to
do
it
so
that
it
moves
up
the
process
to
allow
the
appointees
to
be
able
to
complete
the
process
in
a
timely
fashion,
so
they
can
begin
their
service.
K
Mr
chair,
if
you
don't
mind
I'll
make
the
motion
for
september
9th
at
what
was
that
501.
K
I
G
G
C
All
right,
mr
mascot,
anything
sir.
I
No
nothing
nothing
over
here,
so
I'm
we're
good
wow.
He
didn't
leave
me
anymore.
J
I
just
need
to
file
a
conflict
form
from
last
week
and
I
think
that
the
clerk
has
a
copy.
So
could
we
just
vote
to
receive
and
file
yeah.
K
Two
things
very
quickly,
mr
chair:
a
motion
for
staff
to
give
a
report
on
the
state
of
homelessness
population
and
its
impact
on
the
city
department's
community
partners,
specifically
the
tampa
hillsborough
homeless
initiative,
the
downtown
partnership
and
heart
on
september
23rd
as
a
city
council
workshop
and
they'll
only
be
five
minutes.
Ten
minutes
for
the
tampa
hillsborough
homeless,
five
minutes
for
downtown
partnership
with
five
minutes
for
heart
all.
C
K
K
He
went
from
doing
his
regular
job
for
the
city
to
saving
the
city,
tons
of
money
as
a
negotiator,
and
I
just
want
to
say
brad.
Thank
you
for
all
the
work
to
do.
Mr
loretta,
thank
you,
sir.
I
have
a
couple
of
them.
I
want
to
like
to
make
a
motion
to
present
accommodation
to
moray
holmes.
Our
former
neighborhood
liaison
she
has
served
in
this
capacity
for
eight
years
and
her
unwavering
support
for
the
city
of
tampa
neighborhood
associations
would
surely
be
missed.
She
had
a
huge
job.
K
Ms
holmes
has
moved
to
another
position
within
the
city
of
tampa,
but,
as
many
of
us
know,
all
of
us
believe
that,
without
her,
the
association
would
have
never
got
the
recognition
that
they
have
within
the
city
and
I'd
like
to
present
this
combination
to
ms
holmes
on
the
23rd
of
september
2001..
Second,.
K
And
just
like
it
like
that,
we
don't
forget
that
today
is
women's
history.
Quality
day
women,
equality,
separate
celebrated
every
august,
26
commemorates
a
passage
of
the
women's
suffrage
in
the
united
states
and
reminds
us
of
all
the
hurdles
they
had
to
overcome
by
the
historic
women
who
face
violent
discrimination
to
propose
a
women's
movement
forward.
Also,
women
aren't
done
yet.
You
know
the
equal
rights
thing.
The
wage
gap
still
exists,
and
today
women
still
impact
women,
economic
power,
the
general
base
discrimination
still
plagues
workspace
and
business
transaction.
I
I
I
apologize.
I
just
want
to
ask
miss
zellman.
I
I
see
she's
still
on
in
regards
to
the
item
103.
When
will
it
go
to
the
planning
commission
when
is
it
scheduled?
C
A
B
B
Down
and
it'll
come
back
to
us,
language
has
to
be
put
in
ordinance
form
sent
to
the
county
commission
planning
commission
scheduled
on
their.
They
do
a
workshop
and
a
meeting
we
can
certainly
you
know,
ask
them
to
expedite
it,
but
I
just
honestly
can't
say
without
having
someone
talk
to
them
to
find
out
where
they
are
in
their
schedule.
Remember
their
meetings
require
advance
notice
as
well.
B
I
C
My
last
one
to
have
the
solid
waste
director
come
forth
and
give
us
recommendations
on
reference
to
the
apartment,
complexes
and
businesses
who
have
the
trash
bins
that
are
too
small
for
service
we're
recently
having
issues
with
garbage
all
over
the
place,
and
some
of
these
businesses
don't
have
the
ample
size
for
their
businesses
and
the
apartment
complexes.
How
many
small
trash
receptors
are,
and
it's
not
working
several
complaints
on
that.
So
I
want
to
know
what
our
waste
department
is
doing
to
combat
that
if
they
are
going
going
out.
C
C
K
Regarding
the
same
issue,
I
have
started
another
avenue
because
I
had
received
some
information
from
some
good
hard
working
individuals
that
work
in
that
department
and
also
local
1454,
that
some
of
the
streets
in
south
tampa
so
small
and
they
park
on
both
sides
and
the
truck
can't
go
through
and
and
they
have
a
problem.
So
if
we
can,
if
we
can
add
on
to
that
piggy
back
to
your
statement,
see
if
he
can
come
to
us
there,
there's
only
got
one
small
truck.
K
I
Yeah,
I
believe
it
was
mr
lentz
leroy
that
brought
it
up
because
he
put
a
photo
on
facebook.
Videos
couldn't
get
the
trucks
down
the
street
because
people
were
double
parked
on
one
side.
So
I'm
glad
you
brought
that
up.
We
have
a
motion
from
council
member.
C
I
October
28th,
and
then
we
have
workshops,
we
have
a
couple
of
commendations
so
yeah,
I
guess
what
9
30..
I
C
All
right
motion
receiving
file
so.