►
From YouTube: TCC PM 10-14-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
B
D
As
the
chair
said,
you
have
a
physical
quorum
present
live
in
chambers
and
tonight's
land
use
and
quasi
judicial
meet
hearings
are
being
conducted
in
light
of
the
continuing
covet
19
governments
issued
health
standards
or
guidance
in
effect,
and
because
of
that
members
of
the
public
shall
have
the
ability
to
participate
virtually
through
video
teleconferencing,
which
is
referred
to
by
florida
statutes
and
rules.
D
D
Now
there
are
alternative
methods
to
participate
in
tonight's
meeting
and
those
have
been
listed
in
the
notice
of
hearing
and
also
on
the
city's
website
at
tampa.gov
forward,
slash
city
council.
One
word
now
for
those
who
want
to
participate
remotely
through
communications,
media
technology,
pre-application
was
required
and
that
information
is
available
on
the
city
camp
of
tampa's
city
council's
webpage
and
also
at
tampa
dot.
D
Also,
mr
chairman,
I'm
going
to
ask
the
people
on
the
second
floor
to
please
remain
quiet
that
if
you
should
talk
that
you
talk
in
a
whisper
or
a
low
voice
or
take
your
comments
perhaps
to
the
third
floor.
If
you
need
to
discuss
so,
the
sound
does
not
travel
and
the
hearings
can
be
conducted
efficiently.
D
Written
comments
that
have
been
received
have
been
distributed
to
city
council
and
will
be
included
in
the
permanent
record
of
the
meeting.
All
comments
that
have
been
timely,
received
by
mail,
email
or
via
cmt
will
be
afforded
equal
consideration
as
if
the
public
comments
were
made
in
person.
One
last
comment
with
regard
to
the
platform
virtually
go
to
meeting.
There
is
a
chat
box
that
chat
box
is
not
to
be
used
to
communicate
with
city
council
members.
That's
only
to
be
used.
D
If
you
have
technical
problems,
please
do
not
communicate
using
the
chat
box
unless
it's
for
a
technical
issue.
That
being
the
case,
mr
chairman
members
of
council
I'd
ask
that
you
waive
the
rules
and
adopt
these
rules
consistent
with.
What's
in
the
notice
and
the
agenda
relative
to
a
virtual
hybrid
meeting
motion.
A
D
Mr
chairman,
did
you
want
to
hear
from
the
staff.
A
E
Thank
you
good
evening,
council
annie
barnes
development
coordination.
There
are
a
few
items
to
clean
up
before
you
tonight.
The
first
item
is
item
number
two
rec.
E
E
Item
number
eight
rec
2181,
the
application
could
not
be
heard
because
notice
was
not
perfected.
Can
you
please
remove
this
application
from
the
agenda.
A
E
F
Hey
good
evening,
council
tyler,
hudson
400
with
ashley
drive.
Can
you
all
see
me
we'll.
F
Okay,
sorry
yeah
requesting
a
continuance
to
december
9th
for
these
paired
hearings,
one's
a
right
away,
vacating,
the
other,
is
a
rezoning.
F
We
just
need
about
60
more
days
to
clean
up
a
few
items,
so
we
present
to
you
the
most
complete
application
possible
and
would
appreciate
your
motion
to
continue
this
to
december
9th.
Thank
you.
D
Speakers
relative
to
three
or
ten,
madam
clerk.
D
Okay
and
mr
chairman,
just
a
reminder,
and
to
those
who
are
watching
on
television,
we
just
have
to
verify
the
date
and
the
time
and
see
if
that
fits
within
the
calendar.
If
we
can
do
that
with
with
staff
you're
requesting
you're
requesting
when
sir.
E
So
501
pm
there
are
on
december
9th
there
will
be
a
total
of
13
rezoning
applications.
That
night.
D
So
this
would
this
would
be
the
maximum.
I
guess
at
this
point
unless
the
council
would
wish
to
go
and
waive
those
rules,
and,
mr
chairman,
again
we're
going
to
have
to
discuss
how
on
monday,
we
move
forward
past
that.
But
if
that's
the
application-
and
there
is
a
slot
available
to
pursuant
to
your
your
current
direction-
I
believe
that
would
be
appropriate
if
it's
council's
pleasure.
C
Mr
chair,
if
I'm
may,
mr
hudson
are
you
there.
H
F
This
is
a
lot
of
echo
here.
There's
a
this
property
comprises
a
full
city
block
and
there
is
a
historic
structure
at
the
northeast
corner.
That
structure
is
subject
to
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
application
that
will
be
heard
on
december
6th
to
relocate
that
structure
and
we'd
like
to
have
before
you
on
december,
9th
the
confirmation
that
that
that
has
been
approved.
I
think
it's
going
to
make
for
a
more
a
simpler,
simpler
story.
F
It
is
sir,
due
to
some
contractual
deadlines.
This
must
be.
The
first
reading
must
happen
under
the
contracts
this
year
in
december,
and
we
have
significant
amounts
of
neighborhood
support.
We
are
not
aware
of
any
opposition
at
this
time
and
understanding
council's
busy
schedule.
We
will
give
a
much
more
efficient
presentation
at
that
time
and
we'll
be
very
respectful
of
your
time,
as
we
always
seek
to
do.
J
I
A
A
You
know
a
lot
of
other
aspects
that
we
council
needs
to
do
but
I'll
entertain.
The
motion
tonight
give
mr
hudson
that
that
leeway,
but
I
can
tell
you
after
tonight
hopefully
and
with
going
forward,
we
won't
be
having
these
kind
of
continuouses
anymore.
Mr
denver
has
made
a
motion,
mr
citro,
mr
miranda
seconded
it
all
in
favor
all
right
any
opposed.
D
D
F
A
E
D
K
Yes,
good
evening,
council
candy
court
with
the
law,
firm
hill,
ward
and
henderson.
We
did
send
in
a
letter
on
tuesday
afternoon
requesting
a
continuance
to
the
november
18th
city
council
date.
We
were
ready
to
go,
but
we
are
before
we
request
it.
K
We've
requested
the
continuance
because
we
are
working
with
state
beach
park
and
some
of
the
other
neighborhood
associations
over
there
and
we're
working
on
specifically
trying
to
reassign
the
property
to
a
less
congested
school
district,
and
we
were
hoping
we
would
be
further
along
with
that
process
than
we
we
are
today
and
so
in
good
faith.
K
We
agreed
to
continue
this
case
to
november
19th
at
their
request,
because
they
would
like
some
further
assurances
from
the
school
board
that
this
is
going
to
happen,
and
obviously
this
isn't
something
that
we
could
condition
zoning
on,
and
so
we
agreed
to
go
ahead
and
request
the
continuance
and
we
noted
in
the
letter
that
we
waived
the
180
day
processing
time
frame
and
would
respectfully
request
that
you
approve
it.
J
You,
mr
chairman,
as
a
cautionary,
I
believe,
and
I'm
not
trying
to
take
sides
with
either
one
here,
but
I
think
this
is
your
second
or
third
continuation.
Am
I
correct
now.
J
C
Mr
I
moved
to
mr.
D
D
C
A
K
E
Anastasia
barnes
development
coordination.
There
are
no
other
housekeeping
items.
However,
I
do
request
that
staff
be
sworn
in
at
this
time.
J
E
B
A
D
E
Yes
and
then
before
we
continue,
could
we
please
swear
stopping
all.
B
K
Good
evening,
chairman
goods
and
council
members,
mclean
evans
assistant
city
attorney
agenda
item
number
one
before
you
is
the
first
of
two
public
hearings
before
council
for
a
proposed
designation
of
a
brownfields
area
pursuant
to
chapter
376,
florida
statutes
for
a
property
located
at
4110
george
road.
An
application
has
been
submitted
to
the
city
of
tampa
by
the
site:
developer,
highway,
slim
highwoods,
realty,
limited
partnership.
K
Requesting
designation
of
this
property
is
a
brownfield
area
to
assist
in
the
assessment
and
remediation
of
environmental
impacts
that
may
exist
on
the
property
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
determined
it
meets
the
statutory
criteria
for
a
brownfield
area
designation
in
accordance
with
the
statutory
requirement
the
property
owner
has
held
their
on-site
public
hearing
on
monday
september
13th
at
the
independence
park
office
complex
details
of
the
designation
have
been
outlined
in
a
document
entitled
staff
report
on
an
independence
park.
Redevelopment
area
proposed
brownfield
area
designation,
which
has
been
provided.
K
Package
and
is
available
for
public
review
at
the
city
clerk's
office.
At
the
conclusion
of
the
second
public
hearing,
which
is
scheduled
for
november
4th
at
9
00
a.m,
council
will
have
an
opportunity
to
pass
a
resolution
designating
independence
park
redevelopment
area
as
a
brownfield
area.
The
purpose
of
this
evening's
hearing
is
to
take
public
comment.
No
other
action
is
required
by
council
on
this
item
today,
staff
and
I
are
available
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have.
H
B
To
no
speakers
for
this
item-
racial
speakers-
okay,.
K
Simply
taking
public
comment
if
any
public
has
turned
out
to
speak
other
than
that.
That
concludes
our
business.
We
can
close
the
hearing.
A
E
Thank
you,
council,
annie
barnes
development
coordination.
Item
number
four
is
rec
2142.
The
subject
property
is
located
at
411
east
palm
avenue.
The
request
is
to
rezone
the
property
from
planned
development,
to
planned
development,
to
allow
development
of
residential
single-family,
semi-detached
and
residential
studio
dwellings.
I'll
turn
over
the
presentation
to
the
planning
commission
and
after
their
presentation.
I'll
conclude
my
report.
L
L
Okay,
so
if
annie
opened
a
slip,
this
is
rec
2142.
This
is
located
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district
within
the
tampa
heights
urban
village.
There's
a
transit,
stop
adjacent
to
the
site
at
the
corner
of
north
central
avenue
and
east
palm
avenue.
The
low
site
is
not
within
an
evacuation
zone.
The
surrounding
area
is
it's
on
on
the
south
side
of
east
palm
just
west
of
the
I-275
interstate.
L
L
The
adopted
feature
of
land
use
is
residential
83.
That's
a
pretty
high
future
language
category.
It's
primarily
within
this
area
of
the
city
to
the
north,
that
lighter
blue
brown,
color
is
residential,
35
and
then
to
the
east.
Is
urban
mixed
to
60.
did
find
this
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan?
The
proposed
rezoning
would
allow
consideration
of
four
dwelling
units
on
the
site.
L
We
also
from
a
design
perspective
we're
supportive
of
the
units
utilized
in
the
alley
on
the
southern
boundary
of
the
plan,
which
is
supported
by
the
southern
boundary
of
the
site,
which
is
supported
by
the
comprehensive
plan.
And
lastly,
this
request
supports
the
conference
and
policies
as
it
relates
to
housing
the
city's
population.
L
We
always
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
an
adequate
supply
of
housing
to
meet
the
needs
of
that
present
and
growing
population,
and
the
plan
supports
utilizing
those
infill
parcels
or
vacant
sources,
and
it
is
within
an
urban
village,
and
we
also
want
to
direct
the
great
issue
of
growth
to
those
areas.
So
that
concludes
my
presentation.
I'm
available
for
new
questions.
Thank
you.
E
All
right,
can
you
please,
or
can
you
see
my
screen?
We
can
see
your
screen
great.
Thank
you
again.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
rezone
411
east
east
palm
avenue
from
plane
development
to
planned
development
to
allow
for
development
of
residential
single-family,
semi-detached
and
residential
studio
dwellings.
The
applicant
is
requesting
two
waivers.
The
first
waiver
requested
is
to
allow
parking
in
a
non-structurally,
integrated
garage,
and
the
second
waiver
is
to
reduce
parking
required
parking
from
nine
to
eight
spaces,
which
is
an
11
reduction.
E
E
This
is
the
site
plan
provided
by
the
applicant,
showing
the
two
proposed
semi
or
single
family,
semi-detached
residential
units
and
two
residential
studio
units.
As
you
can
see,
vehicular
access
is
provided
from
east
palm
avenue
for
the
single
family,
semi-detached
units
and
vehicular
access
is
provided
from
the
alley
for
the
studio
dwellings.
E
E
E
Shown
here
is
property
located
across
north
central
avenue
and
southeast
of
the
site.
As
you
can
see,
it
remains
mostly
undeveloped,
and
this
is
the
intersection
of
east
palm
avenue
and
central
avenue
north
directly
north
of
the
subject,
site
development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
found
the
request
inconsistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
code
and
ordinances.
Please
refer
to
transportation
comments
for
overall
inconsistency.
E
Finding
modifications
did
site
play
must
be
completed
by
the
applicant
between
first
and
second
reading,
as
stated
on
the
revision
sheet,
if
approving
the
application.
That
concludes
my
presentation,
I'm
available
for
any
questions
you
might
have
any.
M
The
application
that
city
staff
has
just
described
as
part
of
a
final
staff
report
is
a
four
unit,
single-family
semi-detached
development,
with
two
units
being
on
palm
avenue,
which
will
look
like
a
single
family
home
but
are
actually
a
duplex
townhouse,
the
similar
property
on
the
south
side
of
palm
avenue,
those
are
again
historic
houses
and
or
professional
office
space
around
and
adjacent.
M
M
A
M
So
so
again,
this
is
our
subject
site.
We
have
similar
properties
in
development
style
in
density
along
the
south
edge
of
palm
avenue.
M
Here,
as
as
annie's
alluded
to,
we
are
in
an
extremely
dense
zoning,
as
we
are
in
the
urban
core
palm
avenue
is
here
so
everywhere
surrounding
this,
the
the
future
land
use
is
r83.
M
Again
to
review
our
site
plan,
our
site
plan
is
has
has
a
couple
significant
things.
First
of
all,
we
we
have
been
and
presented
this
project
through
the
architectural
review
commission
and
got
a
unanimous
vote
of
support
for
this
project.
M
For,
for
several
reasons,
first
and
foremost,
we
have
a
existing
house
here,
an
existing
house
here
we're
taking
a
lot
average
of
that
house
to
create
the
the
setback
here,
which
is
around
19
feet.
We
have
again
two
two
units
which
will
look
like
a
single-family
house
in
scale
and
massing
a
courtyard
in
the
here
in
the
middle
two
separate,
I'm
sorry,
two
two
car
garages
connected
by
a
party
wall
again.
M
The
intent
here
is
to
really
have
two
single-family
semi-detached
properties
that
could
be
sold
independently,
and
so
each
each
side
would
then
again.
Very
traditional
have
have
a
townhouse,
a
two-car
garage,
a
studio
above
the
two-car
garage,
a
a
parking
space
for
the
studio
additional
visitor
spaces.
Here
we
come
up
with
eight
spaces.
M
The
reason
why
transportation
says
we
need
nine
is
they
believe
and
that
they
calling
this
each
a
dwelling
unit
and
they
want
two
spaces
each
for
these
studios,
which
I
understand
this
may
be
technically
correct,
but
I
don't
think
it's
practical,
so
we
again
provide
eight
eight
parking
spaces,
which
I
think
is
more
than
sufficient
for
this
development.
M
M
Again,
this
is
the
this
is
the
front
on
palm
here.
This
would
again
go
through
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
through
city
council.
I'm
sorry
through
arc.
After,
if
you
so
choose
to
approve
this
rezoning,
we
would
come
back
and
get
specific
agreements
on
that
through
through
arc
and
that's
scheduled
for
january
again,
it's
a
farm
frame,
vernacular
house
with
a
metal
roof
lap,
siding
all
the
things
that
this
is
part
of.
Tampa
heights
embraces.
M
M
The
staff
report-
again,
we
have
reviewed
reviewed
it.
We
would
make
all
the
noted
corrections
between
first
and
second
reading
to
make
some
of
these
cleanup
items
same
thing
with
natural
resources.
Again
I
spoke
about
transportation
and
and
why
I
they
said
it
as
it
is
inconsistent
which
I
again,
I
believe
is
really
when
you
only
need
seven,
not
nine
parking
spaces.
We
have
provided
eight.
M
M
So
all
the
waivers
that
we
have
are
are
technical
in
nature
and
do
not
adversely
affect
the
adjacent
neighbors.
So
in
conclusion,
the
project
is
using
vacant
undeveloped,
land
and
sensitive,
develop
a
compatible
project
in
scale
density,
design
and
aesthetics.
That
confirms
conforms
to
the
goals
of
the
neighborhood
at
large
in
the
tampa
heights
historic
district.
I
would
ask
that
you
approve
this
project
tonight,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
and
I
believe
we
have
some
neighbors
here
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
project.
A
Any
questions
for
the
applicant.
C
M
So
I
have
two
two
parking
spaces
within
the
garage.
Then
a
third
adjacent
to
the
garage.
We
have
enough
room
to
do
that
and
then
I
have
also
a
ribbon
drive
on
palm
avenue
with
it,
with
with
two
tandem
spaces
here
for
a
total
of
eight
spaces.
C
Okay,
thank
you,
the
the
the
entryways
off
the
alley
on
studio
one
and
studio
two.
How
far
is
that,
from
the
end
of
the
building
to
the
south,
to
the
alleyway
itself,.
M
So
we
have
a
10
foot
step
back
for
vehicular
turning
race,
as
required
by
transportation.
Then
this
this
studio
is
24
feet
deep,
so
the
beginning
of
that
is
about
30
32
feet.
C
M
H
N
H
Good
evening
my
name
is
edward
bembry.
I
live
approximately
one
block
and
a
half
away
from
the
proposed
project.
I
too
concur
with
the
what
was
what's
about
to
be
built
and
and
approve,
and
hope
that
we
have
other
projects
like
this
in
our
neighborhood.
Thank
you.
F
O
Daily
basis
and
we're
very
excited
about
what's
happening
down,
there
what's
been
approved,
what's
been
proposed,
and
we
think
that
this
this
particular
project
will
be
a
very
big
asset
to
that
area,
as
we
start
to
improve
the
neighborhood.
So
we're
very.
J
J
Question
on
the
studios,
what
size
studios
are
you
building
over
the
garages.
M
M
C
Yes,
and
are
you,
do
you
know
if
there
is
street
parking
on
the
right-of-way
of
palm
avenue.
M
There's
no
street
parking
on
palm
avenue
currently
because
there
is
a
median,
I
think
eventually,
that's
proposed
for
the
trolley
to
go
down
palm
avenue,
but
we
do
have
sufficient
street
parking
along
central
and,
of
course,
there's
a
lot
of
street
parking
currently
south
and
and
west
of
this.
This
project,
but
as
the
city
develops
you
know,
parking
problem
is,
I
think,
is
eventually
going
to
be
a
something
that
we'll
all
deal
with.
But
I
don't
believe
we
have
an
issue
with
parking
on
this
project
at
all.
I
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Do
we
have
transportation
staff
on
the
line?
Mr
chairman
great
runs.
Thank
you.
Yes,
sir.
I
Hey
jonathan,
mr
scott,
so
you
know,
I
guess
they're
asking
for
a
waiver
on
that.
One
space
transportation
feel
strongly
about
that,
as
the
petitioner
has
has
suggested.
I
F
I
mean
there's
street
parking,
I
mean
as
long
as
they
don't
parking
parking,
no
parking
sign
and
close
to
stop
signs
and
all
that
other
stuff.
But
I
think
the
applicant
did
a
pretty
good
job
of
trying
to
maximize
whatever
parking
he
could
on
the
site.
It's
just
that.
He
has.
You
know
four
units
and
each
unit
had
to
have
two
spaces
in
the
visitor
parking,
but
I
thought
he
did
a
pretty
good
job
of
trying
to
get
as
many
parking
spaces
as
he
could
on
there.
F
But
we
we
do
we're
objecting
to
the
parking.
F
D
G
I
Have
you
heard
anything
from
the
neighborhood
in
response
to
this
petition.
F
I
haven't
heard
anything
no
one's
contacting
me
on
this
one.
All.
H
Yes,
sir,
I
will
mr
chair,
it's
my
pleasure
to
move
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
ordinance,
rezoning
property
in
general
vicinity
of
411
east
palm
avenue
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida,
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
pd
plan
development,
plant
storage
and
retail
to
pd
plan
development,
residential
single
families
and
I'd
attached
in
residential
studio
dwellings,
providing
an
effective
date.
A
All
right,
mr
veera,
has
moved
it.
Mr
second.
J
E
Thank
you,
council,
annie
barnes
development
coordination.
Item
number.
Five
is
rec
2174.
The
subject
property
is
located
at
2907
and
half
north
boulevard
and
2909
north
boulevard.
The
request
is
to
rezone
the
property
from
rs
50
residential
single
family,
to
pd,
planned
development
to
allow
for
development
of
residential
single
family
detached
dwellings,
I'll
turn
over
the
presentation
to
the
planning
commission
and
after
their
presentation,
I'll
conclude
mine.
L
Jennifer
mullen
with
the
planning
commission,
this
is,
as
annie
stated,
rec
2174.
L
This
is
located
in
the
central
campus
planning
district
within
the
tampa
heights
building
village
as
well.
This
is
the
ariel
of
the
subject
site.
We
have
some
offices
along
this
portion
of
north
boulevard.
Graham
elementary
is
located
to
the
east
of
the
site
and
further
east
of
the
site.
We
do
have
some
single
family
detached
housing.
L
L
The
area
the
future
of
land
use
is
residential
10
to
the
north.
It's
residential
20,
that's
that
blue
or
that
brown
color
and
then
further
north
is
suburban.
Mixed
use.
Six,
that's
the
light
pink
color
that
allows
some
infill
offices
south
of
the
subject.
Site
is
more
residential
20
at
plaza
place
in
west
warren
avenue.
L
So
the
planning
commission
did
find
its
commitment
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
The
residential
10
feature.
Landings
designation
promotes
this
type
of
development
pattern,
and
this
is
asking
for
two
single
family
detached
units,
which
is
exactly
what
the
what
the
latest
category
is
calling
for.
This
would
allow
for
an
overall
density
of
9.06
units
per
acre,
which
is
consistent
with
the
density
that
we
would
anticipate
under
the
residential
10
featured
language
designation.
L
L
I
can't
like
the
width
or
the
length
whoa.
L
I
would
have
to
look
at
annie.
I
I
would
prefer
the
annie
on
that.
E
Yeah
so
so
amy
barnes
dollar
coordination,
I'm
gonna
go
over
the
conforming
lot
map
that
we
did
an
analysis
of
when
I
in
my
presentation,
so
that
that
should
give
you
a
better
idea.
That's.
E
All
right
we
got
it
already.
Can
you
see
my
screen
now
you
see
it
great
again.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
rezone
2907
and
a
half
north
boulevard
and
two
909
north
boulevard
from
rs
50
to
residential
residential
single
family,
to
pd
plan
development
to
allow
development
of
residential
single
family
detached
dwellings.
E
The
applicant
is
requesting
two
waivers.
The
first
waiver
requested
is
to
allow
reduction
in
aisle
width
from
24
feet
to
13
feet,
and
the
second
waiver
is
to
allow
a
reduction
in
the
location,
the
location
of
the
structural
edge
of
the
vehicular
entrance
of
a
two-car
garage
set
back
from
10
feet
to
3
feet,
so
the
site
is
comprised
of
lots,
18
and
19
block
d
of
wc
black's.
E
So
here's
the
conforming
lot
map
that
I
was
discussing
earlier.
There
was
an
analysis
of
441
total
lots.
Staff
identified
that
15
of
the
lots
in
the
study
area.
67
percent
of
the
subject
block
73
percent
of
the
lock
of
north
boulevard
and
66
percent
of
the
block
face
are
lot
widths
of
49.99
feet
or
less
staff
finds
the
proposed
lots
measuring
40
feet
in
width
as
historically
planted
consistent
with
the
existing
development
pattern.
E
E
As
you
can
see
here,
this
is
an
aerial
map.
With
surrounding
zoning.
There
are
a
mixture
of
residential
and
office
uses
in
the
immediate
area.
Property
located
west
and
north
and
across
north
boulevard
is
owned.
A
residential
office
and
developed
within
office
use
property.
South
this
site
is
owned.
Our
residential
office
as
well
and
developed
with
the
single
family
use
property
directly
north
of
the
site,
is
zoned
pd
and
developed
with
a
business,
professional
office
and
property
east
of
the
subject.
Site
is
zoned,
rs50
and
developed
with
single-family
residential
uses.
E
All
right,
thank
you.
No
problem
shown
here
is
property
located
across
the
street
from
the
subject
subject:
site
along
north
boulevard,
and
this
is
facing
the
other
way
along
northward
northwest
on
north
boulevard
as
well.
E
This
is
the
alley
currently
as
it
runs
behind
facing
northwood,
northward
and
then
again.
Here
is
a
office
across
the
street.
It
is
two-story
and
two
stories
in
size,
but
set
back
quite
a
bit
again.
This
is
the
alley
facing
south.
So
from
both
sides,
you
can
see
the
alley
in
accordance
with
policy
9.38.
E
E
The
massing
of
the
height
of
the
proposed
two
two-story
structures
on
lots
measuring
40
feet
in
width
is
too
large,
especially
in
a
neighborhood
comprised
of
smaller
one-story
structures.
Therefore,
development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
inconsistent.
That
concludes
my
report
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions
you
might
have.
A
E
M
G
G
All
the
details
associated
with
this
rezoning
case
have
been
thoroughly
described
by
the
city's
development
coordination
presentation
and
the
planning
commission.
I'm
not
going
to
repeat
everything.
That's
in
the
report.
The
staffs
always
do
a
very
thorough
job,
and
again
I
will
not
reiterate
all
of
them.
I
do
want
to
address
and
respond
to
the
matters
of
inconsistency
described
in
the
report
regarding
the
development
coordination,
staff's
findings
of
concern
related
to
the
width
of
the
alley
access.
G
There
are
some
homes,
obviously
that
access
or
are
located
on
the
alley
from
historical
purposes
and
reference
and
development,
but
it
is
an
existing
situation
and
we're
trying
to
design
and
introduce
redevelopment
to
the
area
as
is
occurring
throughout
the
area
in
the
broader
neighborhood,
as
you're
quite
familiar
with,
in
this
particular
case,
we're
trying
to
accommodate
and
best
design
a
product
that
is
very
marketable
in
in
that
part
of
the
city,
as
our
environs
in
the
urban
area
are
being
re-examined
and
rediscovered.
G
G
Obviously
this
is
new
development,
but
as
the
area
redevelops,
there
may
be
other
continued
access
and
need
for
use
of
that
alley,
and
it's
potentially
establishing
a
one-way
flow.
If
that
makes
sense
is
something
that
the
applicant
is
willing
to
explore
with
the
city
as
an
option
and
and
possibly
adjust
the
garage
building
placement
in
final
design
to
best
accommodate
safety
in
accordance
with
the
city's
review
and
approval.
G
Therefore,
we
believe
a
some
type
of
waiver
to
recognize
what
would
be
appropriate
accessory
garage
parking
in
what
will
be
a
modernly
placed
and
constructed
structure
is
appropriate
and
waivers
are
justifiable
in
that
regard,
but
again,
with
the
assumption
that
we
can
work
out
some
some
solutions
that
are
satisfactory
at
the
time
of
permitting
the
other
inconsistency
of
regarding
massing
and
height.
With
regard
to
construction
on
these
two
lots,
the
in
your
packet
you
there-
and
I
I
I
know
there
are
site
plans
that
were
illustrated
on
the
screen
earlier.
G
These
are
two
existing
platted
lots
of
record
that
are
40
feet
wide.
The
two
structures
that
are
proposed
on
the
lot
are
26
feet
wide
and
have
been
developed
elsewhere
successfully
and
marketable
in
that
particular
regard
of
the
uses
and
the
intensity
of
use.
The
density
of
use
would
be
consistent
with
the
adopted
comprehensive
plan.
G
Many
of
the
lots
in
the
study
areas
surrounding
that
area
are
developed
at
and
and
created
at
less
than
49.99
feet.
It's.
It
would
not
be
inconsistent
with
the
development
pattern
and
and
specifically-
and
I
have
on
the
the
overhead,
the
buffer
map,
that
we
utilize
that
best
depicts
the
property's
location
and
the
and
the
property
owners
that
were
notified
with
this
rezoning
within
the
250
feet.
G
The
broader
community
and
neighborhoods
surrounding
this
property
are
all
experienced,
renewed,
infill
and
redevelopment
with
a
mix
of
architectural
designs
in
both
one
and
two-story
structures,
some
that
are
in
the
planning
and
development
stage.
Now
others
are
just
beginning
constructions,
others
that
have
been
built.
The
fact
that
these
two
lots
are
on
boulevard
and
we
are
attempting
to
provide,
through
this
process
and
the
waiver
that
we
seek
access
through
the
alley
we
believe
would
allow
once
developed,
as
indicated
in
these
plans,
something
that
would
be
in
fact
compatible
and
consistent
with
the
neighborhood.
G
The
rezoning,
as
presented
in
the
pdci
plan,
supports
many
of
the
policies
of
the
comprehensive
plan,
as
detailed
in
the
planning
commission's
analysis
and
report,
which
you
have
with
you.
As
you
know,
rezonings
are
to
be
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
It's
my
opinion
that
the
request
is
consistent
with
the
character
of
the
buildings
in
the
area
because
of
the
two-story
height
and
massing
being
consistent
meeting
acceptable
structural
setbacks.
G
The
proposal
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
development
pattern
along
north
boulevard
and
is
consistent
with
the
long
range
development
pattern.
Encouraged
under
the
residential
10
future
land
use
category
that
being
in
the
case
of
north
boulevard,
a
mixture
of
uses
that
would
not
be
incompatible
with
two-story
structures.
G
The
applicant
owner
agrees
with
the
revisions
requested,
as
outlined
in
revision
sheet
number
six,
a
page
number
six
of
the
staff
report
and
intends
to
make
such
site
plan
revisions
between
first
and
second
reading.
With
that,
I
conclude
my
comments
and
respectfully
request
for
support
and
approval,
if
necessary,
with
any
particular
details.
John
diaz,
the
owner
applicant,
is
here
this
evening,
can
answer
any
specific
questions
with
regard
to
what
is
being
proposed
with
design
and
structure
and
the
market
that
he
is
seeking
to
market
these
properties.
To
thank
you.
I
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
mr
larocca,
just
a
couple
of
of
things
number
one
couldn't
help
but
notice
the
big
tree
in
in
the
middle
behind
the
fence.
G
I
Correct,
I
could
ask
staff
or
I
could
ask
you
if
you
wish,
for
the
status
of
that
tree
or
what
condition
it's
in
etc.
It
looks
like
it's
just
you
know,
I
mean
I
don't
know
there
might
be
other
trees,
but
it
looks
like
there's
one
larger
one.
Yeah.
G
K
Hi,
yes,
aaron
mare
development,
coordination
for
natural
resources
good
evening
council,
so
yeah,
that
is
a
21
inch
lower
oak
and
it
does
have
decay
fungus
on
the
root
flare.
So
we
are
in
support
of
removal
of
that
tree
and.
Q
G
I
Okay
and
then
the
other
question,
mr
rocco,
is
perhaps
a
little
more
aesthetic
than
than
but
but
I'm
just
curious.
When
I
look
at
the
west
elevations
facing
boulevard,
is
there
a
sidewalk
along
there
already.
I
Okay,
so
it
looks
like
on
one
of
the
houses
I
can't
tell
which
one
when
I
look
at
the
elevation
sheet
on
page
two,
it
appears
that
one
of
them
has
a
fairly
good
sized
porch.
You
know
facing
boulevard,
which,
of
course
we
always
want.
I
know
you
and
council
always
want
to
encourage
front
porches
for
for
numerous
reasons
that
we
don't
need
to
get
into
tonight,
but
but
it
appears
the
other
one
is,
is
a
rather
small
little.
You
know
just
a
door
opening
and
a
cover
a
cover,
but
really
not
a
porch.
I
H
I've
been
sworn
in
john
diaz
good
evening.
You.
H
Did
I
did
so?
We
were
trying
to
do
something
where
it's
a
where
we're
recognizing
the
past
and
the
the
present
right
or
the
future.
So
we
do.
We
did
to
your
point,
want
to
avoid
bringing
in
two
cookie
cutter
homes.
So
we
had
one
that's
a
little
bit
more
modern
one,
that's
a
little
bit
more
classic.
H
As
far
as
the
front
porch
community.
We
understand
the
importance
in
tampa
heights
of
of
having
the
front
porch.
We
actually
have
side
porches
and
what
we're
considering
is
whether
we
have
the
the
gates
held
back
from
the
side.
If
you
look
you'll
see
that
both
houses
have
both
houses
will
have
like
a
side
porch.
So
we're
kind
of
thinking,
perhaps
more
like
in
the
shade,
does
facing
the
west
side
is
they're
going
to
be
facing
the
sunset,
and
so
we
just
didn't
want
just
didn't
really
think
people
would
be
sitting
there
in
the
sun.
H
I
Okay,
all
right!
Well
I
I
mean
we
don't
have
a
requirement
for
front
porches.
It
just
seems
like,
especially
with
the
the
way
the
code
is
written.
There's
you
know,
there's
opportunities
to
actually
even
intrude
in
the
front
yard
setback.
A
Else,
you're
recognizing
my
concern
is
the
alleyway,
with
a
vehicle
being.
C
I
Yeah,
mr
sutra,
it's
a
a
good
question
and
I'm
glad
you
brought
it
up
about
about
the
alley
because
staff
you
know
they're
asking
for
a
waiver
from
our
code
requirement
in
regard
to
the
three
feet,
or
it's
supposed
to
be
what
10
feet
john
and
it's
back
down
to
three
feet.
So
my
question
is:
is
how
long
an
alley
is
that
and
how
many
homes,
how
many
homes,
arguably
would
be?
You
would
be
utilizing
it.
I
You
know
before
they
get
out
to
a
to
a
street
and-
and
you
know-
because
I
think
that's
you
know,
there's
some
alleys
that
are,
you,
know,
20
houses,
long
and
maybe
used
by
both
sides,
and
you
got
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
alley:
traffic
and
that
sort
of
thing,
but
in
this
particular
neighborhood
it
seems
like
you,
only
have
a
limited
number
of
possible
homes
that
will
be
using
that
alley.
G
Well,
I
mean
based
on
the
the
property
map,
you
can
see
that
there
are
approximately
a
three
six
can.
H
G
Over
there
are
eight
homes
on
the
east
side,
not
all
are
using
them
as
alleys
as
their
closed
fences.
G
G
I
guess
our
perspective
at
this
point
is
obviously
john
diaz
is
a
developer
of
this
type
of
home
and
he
is
involved
with
others
that
are
of
this
character,
where,
where
older
areas
are
being
redeveloped
with
narrow
alleys-
and
it
is
a
concern
of
ours,
what
we'd
like
to
do,
I
mean
we're
willing
to
set
back
another
10
feet,
we're
about
giving
the
property
owner
a
backyard
rather
than
creating
all
driveway
space
to
the
rear
of
the
property.
G
You
know
whether
it's
10
feet
or
we
add
another
five
feet
and
we
can
come
up
with
some
solutions.
I've
been
I'm
not
a
traffic
engineer,
I'll
state,
that
for
the
record,
but
I
I
do
understand
that
while
there
are
standard
code
requirements
and
the
waivers
that
we
are
seeking
are
because
of
inconsistency
with
or
non-compliance
with
those
standards,
the
we
want
to
be
able
to
find
some
solutions
as
we
develop
the
site
with
regard
to
other
alternatives
to
protect
safety
and
visibility
for
cars.
Getting
it
out.
G
I
think
it's
it's
safe
to
understand
and
trying
to
you
know,
play
the
devil's
advocate
as
someone
who
would
buy
a
home,
and
these
are
not
going
to
be.
You
know,
there's
they're
going
to
be
standard
homes
that
the
I
keep
saying
the
market
is
interested
in
buying
young
families
that
are
looking
for
three-bedroom,
two-bath
homes
and
and
and
proper
access
in
a
situation
like
this
in
a
more
urban
environment,
and
they
want
to
be
able
to
get
in
and
out
of
their
property.
G
I
mean
anybody
understands
that,
so
we're
trying
to
do
something:
that's
safe
and
adequate,
but
at
the
same
time
offer
some
green
space
in
the
rear
yard
based
on
where
these
properties
are
located
and-
and
you
know
what
I
I
we're
willing
to
do
when
john
can
agree
to
this-
is
we're
willing
to
look
at
alternatives.
G
I've
indicated,
and
I
can
write
that
into
any
revisions
to
the
to
the
the
conditions
to
indicate
that
we'd
look
at
opportunities,
including
greater
setback,
to
achieve
the
best
possible
solution,
if
that
were
to
be
mixed
with
the
the
backup
mirrors,
the
bollards,
the
other
factors
that
would
go
into
designing
this
to
meet
at
least
a
much
safer
and
accessible
environment.
G
That
that's
I
mean
that's
the
easiest
way.
I
can
answer
the
question
right
now:
we're
open
to
doing
some
things
rather
than
immediately
just
giving
up
all
the
backyard
to
push
everything
back
and
have
all
pavement
and
driveway
understanding
that
that's
important
to
have
to
be
able
to
get
in
and
out
of
those
garages.
G
But
we
were
led
to
believe
early
on
and
I'm
not
saying
that.
That's
a
solution,
I'm
not
speaking
for
jonathan
who
I
know
you're
you're
you're
on
this
meeting.
If
you
will
on
online.
But
maybe
you
can
address
that
we're
looking
at
other
ways
to
to
solve
the
problem.
I'd
like
to
be
able
to
state
that
in
the
record
so
that
we
can
work
with
staff
at
the
time
of
permitting.
J
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
mr
roca,
thank
you
very
much.
As
I
see
this,
this,
your
property
is
facing
to
the
west.
J
J
All
the
way
to
osborne
avenue
turns
around
goes
back
to
florida
or
anywhere
you
want,
and
so
I
understand
why
you
can't
have
and
appreciate
you
can't
have
nothing
in
the
front.
You
got
to
have
your
parking
in
the
back,
because,
if
not
it'd
be
really
chaotic,
so
the
alleyway,
you
said
your
property.
The
first
unit
would
be,
I
think,
three
properties
down.
If
you
look
at
40-foot
lots,
I'm
just
taking
a
guess
and
then
to
your
south,
you
have
the
coroner's
larger
part
of
the
alley.
Am
I
correct.
G
J
So
I
don't
know
if
there's
some
things
that
you
can
do,
I'm
not
suggesting
them,
but
even
in
this
garage,
when
you
leave
our
city
council
parking,
we
finally
put
a
29.95
mirror
there
from
kmart
and
it
works
real.
Well,
you
can
see
what's
coming
on
the
left
side
of
you,
because
you
have
a
blind
spot
when
you
come
out,
you
don't
know
if
somebody's
on
a
baby
with
a
stroller
or
somebody
one
of
the
mopeds
or
people
walking,
and
it
it
saved
a
lot
of
problems.
J
G
About
the
and
I
will
state
for
the
record,
mr
miranda
in
regard
to
your
comments,
that
there
is
reference,
it's
just
in
part
of
the
revisions
in
in
between
first
and
second
reading.
We
need
to
move
that
language
around,
but
right
now
we
have
in
the
plan
a
statement
that
says
at
the
time
of
permitting
the
applicant
will
present
evidence
to
assure
backup
visibility
through
acceptable
means
and
methods
such
as
safety
mirrors
is
one
example.
O
G
Are
being
developed
in
the
area,
maybe
open
up
there's
I
understand
some
under
current
standard
individual
lot
on
the
street
behind
us
on
woodrow.
I
believe
some
new
construction,
that's
that's
going
through
the
normal
permitting
process
and
they
may
want
to
have
access.
I
don't
know
what
they've
designed
but
they're,
not
on
an
arterial.
G
We
recognize
that
the
alley
will
have
to
be
improved
in
putting
mirrors
and
coming
up
with
a
variety
of
solutions,
we're
willing
to
do
that
and
participate,
and
I
will
with
staff's
advice
and
coordination.
I
will
make
sure
I
add
that
to
anything
on
the
notations
and
edits
between
first
and
second
readings
should
be.
J
G
E
F
F
So
unless
you
have
a
smaller
car,
that's
kind
of
a
that
was
our
concern
on
that
one.
I
know
you
can
like
the
applicant
was
talking
about
you.
Can
there
are
things
you
can
do
to
make
it
easier
to
back
up,
but
we
had
recommended.
You
know
to
push
it
back.
You
know
the
10
feet,
but
they
left
it
at
the
three.
But.
C
Okay,
so,
mr
scott,
it
was,
it
was
combination
of
alley
size
and
that
apron
size
of
the
of
the
driveway
into
the
park
into
the
garage.
Excuse
me.
F
Yeah
they
can
use
the
full
width
of
the
valleys,
the
backup
they
have
a
24-foot
backup,
so
they
have
10
foot
for
valley
and
just
three
feet
to
the
vehicle
entrance.
So
they're
asking
for
a
waiver
from
24
to
13
feet,
which
is
a
little
bit
of
a
tight
backup.
That's
what
our
concern
was.
G
C
Yes,
you
know,
you
know
I
I
I
don't
redesign
from
the
dais,
but
I'm
just
letting
you
know
now
that
this
is
a
major
concern
of
mine
and
as
as
the
competent
substantial
evidence
that
you
are
presenting
right
now,
I
I
I
can't.
I
can't
vote
yes
for
this.
If
something
changes
between
now
and
second
reading,
if
it
does
pass,
then
I
will,
I
will
look
at
it
further.
I
hope
you
understand
thank.
I
I
I
You
know
facing
boulevard
without
big
double
garages.
The
flip
side,
mr
citra,
has
articulated
very
well
that
there
is
there.
There
might
be
some
safety
concerns,
and
I
think
what
I
heard
you
say,
john
larocca
was
that
that
you
all
might
be
amenable
to
to
a
compromise,
because
you
do
want
to
provide
your
buyers
with
as
large
a
backyard
as
possible,
and
I
saw
a
reference
to
possible
swimming
pool.
I
So
so
I
think
there
are
some
practical
solutions,
but
putting
that
aside,
we
can't
put
that
on
the
site
plan.
Obviously,
but
would
you
would
you
be
amenable
to
a
five-foot
compromise.
G
I
think
I've
just
spoken
with
mr
diaz
and
we've
talked
about
this
before
we
made
our
presentation
this
evening.
I-
and
I
again,
I
know
enough
about
the
pd
zoning
and
I
know
we
need
to
be
as
specific
as
we
we
can.
I
I
I
believe
we
are
willing
to
accept
going
from
a
waiver
from
the
three
to
the
five
feet.
G
I
G
I
Things
over
and
above
correct,
you
know
in
terms
of
bollards
or
mirrors,
or
what
have
you.
You
know
that
that's
all
fine!
Okay!
G
D
Thank
you.
I
just
wish
council,
if
you
would
inquire
of
the
staff,
ms
barnes
as
to
that
change,
whether
what
is
being
discussed
is
going
to
be
possible
between
first
and
second
reading.
Just
so,
you
can
see
whether
it
can
be
done
logistically.
E
E
But
I
would
like
jonathan
scott
to
with
transportation,
to
confirm
as
well.
F
Yeah
so
they
have
10
feet
for
the
alley
and
then,
if
you
add
the
five
to
the
property
line
to
the
vehicle
entrance,
that's
15
feet.
So
it
would
be
from
24
to
15
to
be
the
new
waiver
and
the
structural
edge
of
the
garage
is
typically
10
feet.
So
they'd
be
going
from
10
feet
to
5
feet.
G
J
The
chairman,
mr
larocca,
mr
diaz
and
council
members,
just
thinking
to
the
future.
If
this
was
2031,
your
car
would
tell
you
anywhere
you
want
to
be.
If
you're
backing
up
sideways
up
or
down
it
has
cameras,
you'll
see
the
whole
thing,
so
I'm
just
thinking,
I'm
not
I'm
not
saying
applicable
that
to
this
petition,
but
I
was
just
here
sitting.
I
said
what
would
happen
with
all
these
electrical.
You
won't
need
these
setbacks
for
the
cars,
because
they're
going
to
tell
you
everything
I
mean
they
have
them
now.
That
does
that.
J
A
Well,
I
I
haven't
spoken.
I
guess
my
my
concern
was
the
setback
with
the
allies,
but
my
my
biggest
concern.
Knowing
that
area
is
the
height
of
the
proposed
project,
the
different
look
on
the
porches
and
the
consistency
of
the
pattern
of
the
neighborhood
know
that.
H
A
Very
well
and
there's
not
too
many
two-story
buildings
in
that
stretch
right
there.
So
that's
a
concern
of
mine
and
that's
why
I
keep
looking
at
the
photograph
of
that
lot.
When
I
look
at
that
lot,
I
look
at
the
house,
that's
adjacent
to
it
and
we'll
see
if
staff
can
put
that
back
up.
Just
so,
councilmembers
can
see
what
I'm
talking
about.
H
A
H
E
Thank
you
also,
while
I'm
sharing
my
screen,
I
want
to
let
you
know
that
the
modifications,
if
any
modifications
are
made
to
the
waivers
they
can
be
done
before
first
second
reading,.
A
Overlooking
those
houses
that
concerns
me.
I'm
gonna
be
frank
which
that
concerns
me,
and
I
know
this-
is
we
truly
affordable
housing
housing
is
a
big
thing,
but
we
still
have
to
be
mindful
of
the
community.
So
that's
bothering
me
at
this
point.
I
just
want
to
make
reference
to
that.
I
don't
know
where
I'm
at
on
this
particular
project
this
time,
but
that
that
just
bothers
me
at
this
particular
time.
Anyone.
Q
Chairman
kate
wells,
chief
assistant
city
attorney
for
the
record,
there's
been
some
discussion
this
evening
with
regard
to
porches,
and
I
just
want
to
remind
the
city
council
that
this
property
is
not
located
within
an
overlay
district
or
within
one
of
the
historic
districts.
So,
typically,
the
design
elements
are
not
before
counselor
would
provide
a
basis
for
approval
or
denial
of
the
application.
Q
That
being
said,
the
issue
of
massing,
mr
chairman,
which
is
what
you
just
brought
up,
that
is
a
component
that
would
properly
be
before
council
for
consideration.
As
you
deliberate
this.
I
believe
that
staff
addressed
them
their
concern
with
respect
to
massing
in
the
staff
report,
but
I
just
wanted
to
caution
other
council
members,
as
you
deliberate
to
please
not
focus
on
design
specific
issues.
Thank
you.
A
I
Thank
you
and
you'll
get
the
last
word,
mr
loretta.
Okay,
thank
you,
but
before
you
close,
mr
chairman,
I
I
think
your
comments
are
are
are
well
stated
you
and
I
both
drive
up
and
down
at
north
boulevard,
a
lot,
I'm
sure
and-
and
I
would
agree
with
you
on
the
traditional
homes
along
north
boulevard.
I
will.
I
will
note
that
there's
a
lot
of
pretty
big
and
tall
town
homes
to
the
south
toward
columbus.
I
More
and
more,
I
don't
know
exactly
what
the
future
holds.
You
know
for
this
particular
you
know
block
or
so.
In
terms
of
of
that
sort
of
thing
I
have,
I
do
have
a
question
and
a
it's
almost
a
rhetorical
question,
but
I
believe
that
that
these
two
single-family
homes
are
are
35
feet
or
less
in
height
period,
because
that's
that's
what
our
code
requires
so
you're,
not
asking
for
any
height
waivers,
sir.
I
If
I
may,
you
know
when
I
have
yeah
so
so
there
you
know,
I
think
I
think
part
of
the
part
of
what
we're
seeing
mr
chairman,
is
that
modern,
look
and,
and
and
and
that's
different
but
miss
wells
is,
I
think,
sort
of
warning
us
a
little
bit.
I
I
think
I
think
what
kate
said
was
we
could
address
mass
and
scale
and
size,
but
but
be
careful
not
to
look
at
design
in
front
porches,
and
I
I
appreciate
that
cautionary
statement
from
her
so
anyway.
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
to
everybody
this.
This
is
35
feet,
just
like
every
pretty
much
every
other
new
house
in
in
the
city,
so.
E
Development
coordination,
andy
barnes,
so
the
difference,
though,
is
this
is
a
40-foot
wide
lot
and
the
standard
euclidean
zoning
districts
don't
allow
40
foot
wide
lots
so
and
you're
correct
and
rs
50
or
60.
The
max
height
would
be
35
feet
all.
A
D
D
A
G
Again,
chairman
goods-
I
I
I
understand
and
respect
your
concern
as-
and
you
know
that
neighborhood
very
well
with
regard
to
the
height
and
the
massing
and
and
and
he's
correct,
also
that
these
are
40
foot
lots,
but
the
reality
of
it
is
the
height
of
these
structures
are
31
feet.
H
And
I-
and
I,
mr
orlando,
just
to
address
your
your
concern.
What
made
me
realize
that
we
can
build
something
like
this
in
this
area,
is
that
I
built
a
house
on
a
40-foot
wide
lot
very
much
right
on
francis
street
and
that's
kind
of
where
we
recognize
that
it's
possible
to
do
this
and
and
still
have
the
house
tie
in
with
the
area.
G
So
my
comment
just
to
conclude,
I
I
believe,
we've
had
a
vigorous
discussion
this
night
on
the
issues
regarding
the
height
and
massing.
I
believe
the
character
it.
You
know.
New
development
is
always
a
change.
40,
45,
50
foot
lots.
This
kind
of
development
is
new
to
the
area.
G
There
are
a
lot
of
yes
offices
and
other
homes
that
are
not
two
stories,
but
there's
a
lot
of
new
news,
two-story
homes
that
are
going
up
in
the
area
and-
and
this
will,
in
my
opinion
on
an
arterial
road-
will
not
be
out
of
character
and
that's
the
point
that
I
made
earlier.
Thank
you
very
much
and
we
respectfully
ask
for
your
consideration
of
approval
and
again
the
one
note
is
we
agree
in
addition
to
the
waiver
sheet.
On
page
six,
we
agree
to
the
waivers
associated
with
the
setbacks
from
the
alley.
A
F
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
chairman.
I
know
a
lot
was
said
and
there's
going
to
be.
Is
there
there's
not
a
revision
sheet?
There's
yes,.
D
By
the
applicant
agreed
by
the
applicant
and
known
by
staff,.
F
Very
good
so
I'll
clarify
that
I
have
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
2907
and
a
half
and
29.019
north
boulevard
in
the
city
of
tampa.
Florida
were
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
rs50,
residential
single
family
to
pd,
plan
development,
residential
single
family,
detached
providing
effective
date
with
the
revision
sheet
and
the
stipulations
and
or
additions
between
first
and
second
reading,
as
stated
by
the
applicant.
That's
already
on
record.
So
it's
clear.
J
May
I
add,
I
may
yes,
sir,
that
the
design
of
the
proposed
development
is
unique
and
therefore
in
need
of
waivers,
the
requested
waivers
would
not
substantially
interfere,
were
entered
to
the
rights
of
others
whose
property
would
be
affected
by
the
waivers
and
there's
others.
The
proposed
development
has
shown
that
the
site
promotes
and
encouraged
development
at
its
appropriate
location,
character
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood
proposed
used
to
promote
ineffective
and
sustainable
use
of
land
and
infrastructure.
J
I
Thank
you
and
just
for
clarification
in
regard
to
the
revision
sheet,
the
the
as
stated
and
concurred
to
by
jonathan
the
the
revised
and
approved
by
the
petitioner.
I
B
P
L
Jennifer
malone,
if
you're
planning,
commission
staff-
thank
you
zane.
This
is
2179.
This
is
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district
and
more
specifically,
it's
in
the
sulphur
springs
neighborhood.
We
have
a
transit
stop
about
right
across
the
street
about
a
quarter
mile
to
the
north
of
the
site.
Cheney
park
is
about
a
half
mile
to
the
east
of
the
site.
It's
in
evacuation
zone
e
there's,
an
aerial
of
the
site.
L
Bush
boulevard
is
located
to
the
north
of
the
site,
and
then
we
have
florida
avenue
to
the
west.
So
both
of
those
are
out
of
the
frame,
but
that's
kind
of
our
surrounding
area.
Here
then,
we
have
the
interstate.
This
is
the
yukon
transfer
center,
that's
owned
by
fdot
to
the
north.
That's
a
transit!
Stop!
We
have
multi-family
in
the
area.
This
is
the
home
depot
in
the
area.
There's
commercial
uses
along
this
portion
of
east
yukon,
but
then
south
of
the
citrix
site
are
single-family
detached
residential.
L
So
we
kind
of
clearly
see
that
pattern
and
when
we
look
at
the
future
landis
the
feature
language
of
the
site
is
community
and
excuse
35,
that's
the
same
future.
Land
use
to
the
north
and
the
northwest
further
north
of
the
site
is
residential
35.
That's
that
multi-family
development
that
I
pointed
out
earlier
into
the
south
as
well
as
initial
10.
That's
where
the
pattern
transitions
to
the
single
family
detached
to
the
south
of
the
site.
L
So
it
is,
it
does
have
this
potential
for
mixed-use
development
on
the
subject
site
because
of
the
land
use,
and
it
has
potential
for
commercial
uses
and
multi-family,
or
a
mixture
of
all
of
that,
the
we
did
find
it
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
I'll
also
note
that
the
applicant
is
utilizing
four
area
ratio
in
this
instance
for
the
dwelling
units
and
they're
using
an
far
of
0.34
this
well
below
the
maximum
two
that
can
be
considered.
L
We
did
look
at
the
existing
fars
surrounding
the
site
and
it
looks
like
the
existing
average
intensity
is
a
0.3,
so
they're
consistent
when
compatible
with
that
existing
intensity
in
the
area.
We
did
find
it
constant
plan.
The
planning
commission
is
supportive
of
the
design
and
how
the
entrance
system
units
and
sidewalks
along
east
yukon
and
north
dixon
avenue
so
there's
clear,
pedestrian
entrances
and
then
front
doors
connecting
to
the
sidewalks.
L
We
also
found
that
the
parking
is
placed
on
the
rear
of
the
site,
which
is
meeting
the
intent
of
those
mixed-use
corridor
policies.
So
again,
this
is
consistent
with
the
contract
city
forum
strategy
that
in
seeks
to
place
housing
near
transit
and
employment
services,
which
this
is
and
revitalize
the
vacant
or
under
utilized
lands.
So
I'm
available
for
any
questions,
and
that
concludes
my
presentation.
P
P
P
The
third
is
to
request
to
pay
the
applicable
planning
district
tree
trust
fund
for
mitigation
trees
that
cannot
be
planted
on
site
and
the
fourth
is
to
reduce
the
required
350
square
feet
of
green
space
per
unit
to
276
square
feet
per
unit.
The
reduction
of
green
space
is
subject
to
the
landscape
and
lou
fees
that
will
be
determined
at
the
time
of
permitting.
P
As
you
can
see
here,
the
property
is
outlined
here
in
red.
The
property
consists
of
three
parcels
here:
the
site
is
an
area
of
24
987
square
feet
or
0.574
acres,
the
go
to
the
next
slide.
The
total
building
area
here
are
the
two
buildings
is
eight
thousand
four
hundred
and
ninety
four
square
feet.
Building
one
you
have
here
is
three
thousand
and
ninety
four
square
feet
and
building
two
is
five
thousand
four
hundred
square
feet.
P
Going
back
as
you
see
to
the
north,
you'll
have
a
transfer
center
owned
by
f-dot.
Also
you'll
have
a
home
depot
right
here
to
the
north,
to
the
west
of
the
site.
You'll
have
a
non-profit
organization
facility
here,
as
I'll
show
on
the
slides
and
the
pictures
coming
up
and
to
the
east
and
to
the
south.
You'll
have
residential
single
family,
as
also
show
in
the
slides
coming
up.
P
Vehicular
access
to
the
site
is
on
north
dixon
avenue
and
also
on
north
seminole
avenue
right
through
as
we
go
along
to
the
site
plan
here,
you'll
see
that
this
building
building
one
is
already
existing
as
you'll
see
in
the
pictures.
All
parking
is
on
the
surface
and
also
underneath
a
little
covered.
Patio
portion
here.
You'll
have
also
parking
for
residents.
P
P
P
P
Based
on
the
review,
development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
a
request.
Inconsistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
land
development
code
should
be
the
pleasure
of
city
council
to
approve
the
application.
Further
modifications
to
the
site
plan
must
be
completed
between
the
first
and
second
reading
of
ordinance,
as
stated
on
the
revision
sheet.
I
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
saying
and
and
or
maybe
kate
or
whatever
attorney
we've
got
in
the
wings
the
at
the
bottom.
It
makes
reference
to
catholic
cherries
tampa
affordable
housing,
who,
I
imagine,
is
probably
the
current,
perhaps
the
current
property
owner.
Ms,
my
can
explain
that
to
us,
but.
I
Are
there
any
special
conditions
or
agreements
associated
with
this
property
as
as
being
affordable,
housing?
Yes,
sir.
P
Yes
know
zany,
saying
development
coordination
has
not
been
done
in
a
while,
but
we
can
do
council
conditions
for
conditions.
In
fact,
we
can
address
the
number
of
units,
the
ami
percentage,
the
dictation
affordability
for
30
years,
and
also
file
for
restrictive
covenant
deed.
So
those
things
can
go
for
the
council
conditions.
Q
This
is
kate
wells
for
the
record.
Yes,
the
applicant.
The
application
itself
indicated
that
this
was
an
affordable
housing
project.
So
if
the
applicant
can
address
those
details
that
zane
has
highlighted,
and
then
those
are
conditions
that
can
be
added
to
the
site
plan
between
first
and
second
reading
and
then,
of
course,
the
restrictive
covenant,
if
agreed
to,
would
be
recorded
at
permittee.
I
Okay-
and
I
know
we're
only
supposed
to
say
within
the
limits
of
of
this
project,
but
in
regard
to
a
more
a
recent
affordable
housing
project,
the
council
saw
there
was
a
whole
agreement,
side
agreement
and
and-
and
I
think
it
even
addressed
inspections
enforceability.
I
You
know
that
sort
of
thing
is
there
a
reason
we
wouldn't
be
doing
doing
that
or
proposing
that
here
in
a
similar
way,.
Q
Yeah
in
that
situation,
they
were
asking
for
an
increase
in
density
from
30
to
35
dwelling
units
to
the
acre.
So
under
section
27-140
of
our
code,
they
were
required
to
enter
into
a
bonus
provision
agreement,
and
that
is
language
that
that
we
worked
out
to
look
at
how
this
would
be
implemented
and
that
agreement
will
come
before
council
next
week.
When
you
consider
that
case
on
second
reading.
I
Okay-
and
ms
mai
has
already
been
just-
have
this
already
been
discussed
with
the
petitioner
and
representative.
B
I
N
Oh
good
evening,
mr
chairman
and
members
of
the
city
council,
again,
my
name
is
tu
mai
of
htmi
inc.
I'm
here
representing
the
applicant
as
staff
has
stated.
The
petition
in
front
of
you
tonight
is
a
request
to
rezone
three
parcels
having
folio
number
zero:
nine,
nine
one,
four:
three:
zero:
nine,
nine
one:
four:
four
and
zero:
nine
nine
one.
Four
eight
from
rs,
50
and
cg
to
pd
total
land
is
0.574
acres
with
the
future
land
use
of
cmu
35..
N
It
is
located
at
the
southeastern
corner
of
the
intersection
of
east
yukon
street
and
north
dixon
avenue.
The
parcels
are
in
the
sulphur
springs,
neighborhood
and
water
and
sewer
provided
by
the
city.
Currently,
the
parcels
are
owned
by
catholic
charities
and
are
as
follows:
folio,
zero,
nine,
nine
one:
four
three
is
zone:
z,
cg.
The
parcel
is
0.11
acres.
It's
currently
a
vacant
commercial
parcel,
polio
099144
is
zoned
rs50.
N
The
parcel
is
0.12
acres
and
is
currently
a
vacant.
Residential
parcel
folio
099148
is
zoned
cg.
The
parcel
has
two
existing
buildings,
one
for
an
office
use
and
the
other
for
warehouse
and
storage
use.
The
existing
structure
fronting
north
dixon
avenue
will
be
converted
into
10
efficiency
units.
The
existing
warehouse
and
storage
will
be
demolished.
A
new
three
thousand
six
hundred
square
feet.
Two
story
building
will
be
built
to
provide
sticks
off
efficiency
units
on
the
first
floor
and
twelve
efficiency
units.
N
On
the
second
floor,
therefore,
the
applicant
is
seeking
to
rezone
the
property
to
pd
for
28,
affordable
housing
units
for
workforce
individuals.
A
little
bit
about
catholic
charities
charities
is
a
non-profit
organization.
The
organization
was
founded
more
than
a
century
ago
by
men
and
women
who
believe
that
collective
efforts
of
the
church
to
faithfully
serve
people
in
need
could
change
the
course
of
poverty
in
our
nation
at
catholic
charities.
They
help
people,
regardless
of
their
faith,
who
are
struggling
with
poverty
and
over
complex
and
other
complex
issues.
N
Catholic
charities
makes
tangible
progress
towards
providing
help
and
hope
to
our
individuals
in
the
community
and
across
the
country.
They
recognize
the
growing
need
to
provide
affordable
housing
for
the
individuals
in
the
workforce.
This
project
is
so
important
for
our
community
because
it
provides
a
basic
need
which
is
housing
a
roof
over
these
individuals.
Heads
and
safe
place
to
lay
their
heads
down
at
night
without
the
fear
of
getting
kicked
out,
as
stated,
the
28
multi-family
units
are
well
below
the
allowable
far.
N
In
addition,
the
applicant
is
also
requesting
four
waivers,
which
mr
hussein
has
stated.
We
understand
that
the
staff,
the
transportation
staff
finds
the
reduction
of
parking
spaces
from
35
to
24
spaces
as
excessive.
However,
I'd
like
to
point
out
that
an
overwhelming
majority
of
these
individuals
who
will
be
occupying
these
units
do
not
own
vehicles,
since
they
cannot
afford
it.
The
future
occupants
will
use
public
transit.
N
N
Can
you
see
it
okay?
So,
as
I
stated
there
is
a
yukon
transfer
station
directly
across
the
street
from
our
subject
site
there
are.
There
are
also
four
additional
bus
stops
located
west
of
the
subject
site,
as
many
commissions
stated
to
close.
The
transit.
Stop
is
within
a
quarter
mile
to
the
west
of
the
subject
site
at
the
intersection
of
north
florida
avenue
and
west
yukon
street
this
transits,
this
transit
stop
is
served
by
heart
route
number
one
connecting
to
the
subject
site
in
downtown
tampa
and
the
university
area.
N
In
addition,
nearby
transit
stops
serve
part
route,
14
and
16..
Lastly,
this
project,
we
believe,
supports
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
It
would
provide
more
residential
housing
choices
for
existing
and
future
population
growth,
while
also
creating
additional
housing
opportunities
consistent
with
a
compact
city
forum
strategy,
the
subject
site
is
located
in
proximity
to
employment
opportunities
such
as
home
depot
walmart,
borderland
office
center
and
amenities
such
as
chinese
cheney
park,
which
is
a
half
a
mile
east
of
the
subject.
Site
and
east
of
the
park
is
roland
park.
N
To
conclude,
we
concur
with
the
planning
commission's
findings
have
consistent
as
the
project
uses
the
limited
land
resources
efficiently
and
pursues
a
development
pattern
that
is
economically
sound
as
well
as
maximizes
a
vacant
and
underutilized
site.
We
reflect.
We
respectfully
request
your
recommendation
to
approve
this
zoning
based
on
all
the
considerations
I've
presented
to
you
tonight.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
consideration
any.
A
Q
Thank
you
since
council
has
raised
the
issue
of
affordable
housing,
and
the
applicant
has
indicated
that
that's
in
fact,
what
this
project
is
for
that
all
28
units
will
be
used
for
workforce
units.
You
know
is
in
the
event
that
this
receives
favorable
consideration
this
evening.
I
would
ask
the
applicant
for
purposes
of
the
amendments
to
the
site
plan
between
first
and
second
readings.
Q
If
she
could
state
for
the
record
what
percentage
ami
would
would
be
the
target
for
the
tenants
at
this
development.
I
know
that
when
the
city
council
has
approved
other
projects
where
they
requested
an
increase
in
density,
the
ami
that
that
was
going
to
be
addressed
there,
it
was
between
80
and
120,
and
I
don't
know
if
your
client
has
has
identified
what
that
percentage
is
going
to
be
for
purposes
of
workforce
housing.
But
we
would
like
to
include
that
as
a
condition
on
the
site
plan.
N
I
can
convert
I'm
sorry.
I
can
confer
with
our
client
to
address
the
percentage,
but
I
do
not
have
that
at
this
time
the
percentage.
I
I
don't
want
to
delay
this
project
if
we
can
avoid
it,
but
it
it
seems
to
me
from
all
the
dialogue,
especially
from
you
that
that
that
it
would
be
very
helpful
to
have
that
kind
of
information
on
the
site
plan
before
second
reading,
or
perhaps
we
can
make
a
reference
on
the
site
plan
tonight
to
an
attachment
that
would
be
perhaps
an
agreement,
an
affordable
housing
agreement
or
understanding
between
the
city
and
miss
mai's
client.
I
I'm
just
trying
to
be
creative
here
and
you
know
not
not
hold
up
a
good
project,
but
at
the
same
time,
at
the
same
time-
and
I
I
want
everybody
to
understand-
he's
listening,
it's
one
thing
for
folks
and
I'm
not
saying
that
catholic
charities
or
miss
mai
would
propose
this.
But
you
know
a
lot
of
people
come
to
us
and
talk
about
affordable
housing,
but
if
we
don't
codify
it
and
we
don't
have
enforcement
mechanisms
and
other
legal
constraints,
then
you
know
then
there's
nothing.
I
Q
Yes,
sir,
if
I
mean
councilman
dingfelder,
miss
mai
has
indicated
on
the
record
that
this
will
be
an
affordable
housing
project.
If,
if
it
receives
favorable
consideration
this
evening,
I
would
ask
council
to
allow
us
and
staff
to
work
with
miss
mine,
her
client,
to
identify
the
ami
percentage.
That
would
then
be
included
on
a
note
on
the
site
plan,
so
it
would
still
be
addressed
between
first
and
second
reading,
and
that
requirement
would
still
be
included
on
the
site
plan
before
it's
certified
for
your
approval
on
second
reading.
A
All
right
sounds
good
all
right.
Well,
anyone
on
the
we'll
move
on
on
the
second
floor
to
speak
on
the
side.
A
R
Yes,
sir,
like
to
move
file,
number
rec,
2179
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration,
ordinance,
rezoning
property
and
general
vicinity
of
86108612
seminole
avenue
at
8619
north
dixon
avenue
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida,
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning,
district
classification,
rs50,
residential
single
family
and
cg
commercial
general
to
pd
plan
development,
residential
multi-family,
providing
effective
date,
including
the
changes
to
be
made
to
site
plan
for
between
first
and
second
reading.
J
That
the
design
for
the
proposed
development
is
unique
and
therefore
in
need
of
waivers
that
the
request
of
waivers
will
not
substantially
interfere
with
or
injure
the
rights
of
others
whose
property
would
be
affected
by
the
waivers.
Also
that
the
proposed
development
is
shown
on
the
site
plan
promotes
and
encourages
development
that
is
appropriate
in
location
character
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood
promotes
use.
Proposed
use,
promotes
the
efficient
and
sustainable
use
of
land
and
infrastructure.
A
A
M
B
E
L
Thank
you,
annie
jennifer,
one
of
the
planning
commission.
As
she
stated,
this
is
rec
2183
traveling
to
the
south,
tampa
planning
district
for
this
item,
the
evacuation
zone
c,
the
closest
public
recreational
facility,
it's
clifton,
cal,
dixon,
tennis
center
within
a
half
mile
to
the
northwest
of
the
site
and
there's
a
transit,
stop
about
792
feet
to
the
northeast
of
the
site
at
the
intersection
of
west
neptune,
street
and
south
and
library
highway.
So
that
would
that
transit.
L
L
And
that's
reflected
when
we
look
at
the
night
plan,
so
the
there's
a
lot
of
community
mixes
35
to
the
north
and
the
east
on
the
west
of
the
subject
site
that
allows
for
the
commercial
uses
and
that
mixed
use
development
pattern,
but
the
civic
site
itself
has
a
residential
six
future
land
use
category.
That's
the
yellow.
L
The
residential
six
allows
for
a
density
of
six
dwelling
units
per
acre
and
when
we
looked
at
the
overall
density,
if
this
is
approved,
the
site
would
have
a
density
of
5.30
units
per
acre.
So
that's
within
that
residential
6
density
that
the
comprehensive
plan
is
seeks
and
it
would
be
compatible
and
consistent
with
that
density
anticipated
under
the
residential
six
featured.
L
Ladies
designation,
we
also
found
that
the
proposed
request
would
allow
for
development,
the
disciplinary
forum,
height
and
scale
as
the
surrounding
residential
uses
along
this
portion
of
south
church
avenue
and
again.
The
comprehensive
plan
encourages
new
housing
on
vacant
and
legalized
land
to
ensure
an
adequate
supply
of
housing
available
to
meet
the
needs
of
tampa's
present
and
future
populations.
L
E
E
E
E
So
here's
a
picture
of
the
subject
site
this
is
shown
here
is
probably
adjacent
and
south
of
the
subject
site
along
south
church
avenue,
and
this
is
a
property
located
east
and
across
south
church
avenue.
This
is
a
picture
of
a
property
adjacent
north
of
the
subject
site.
E
E
Development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
consistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
code
of
ordinances.
Modifications
to
the
site
plan
must
be
completed
by
the
applicant
between
first
and
second
reading
of
the
ordinance,
as
stated
in
the
revision
sheet.
If
approving
the
application
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions,
you
might
have
any.
G
D
H
A
You
she's
going
to
smile
on
facebook,
all
right,
anyone
race
to
the
speaker
on
this
item.
No,
no
to
speakers.
Let's
sit
down
with
the
club,
mr
rand,
the
second
all
in
favor.
C
You
very
much
mr
chair.
Yes,
final
number
rec,
21-83
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading.
Consideration
orders
rezoning
the
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
1511
south
church
avenue
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida,
more
particularly
described
section,
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
pd
plan
development,
general
office
to
pd
plan
development,
residential
single
family
detached
excuse
me
that
the
petitioner
has
met
the
burden
of
proof
through
competent,
substantial
evidence
and
that
the
development
as
conditioned
and
shown
on
the
site
plan
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
C
There
are
revisions
that
need
to
be
done
between
first
and
second
reading.
The
density
proposed
by
the
development
does
not
exceed
the
density.
Application
anticipated.
Excuse
me
under
future
land
use
category
and
will
not
alter
the
characteristic
or
the
development
pattern
in
the
portion
of
the
neighborhood
pursuant
to
land
use
policy.
J
A
You
all
right
well
last
item
of
the
eating
number
11.
D
With
regard
to
item
number
11,
I
think
we
have
some
preliminary
matters
that
need
to
be
discussed,
so
I
would
suggest
that
we
do
that
before
we
have
staff's
introduction
and
presentation,
please
what.
I
All
right,
mr
chairman,
if
I
could
you
recognize
that
all
right
I'll,
I
will
save
the
the
applicant
and
who
heard
their
attorney
the
trouble
mr
michelini
is
here
for
the
record
and-
and
I
believe
mr
dussette
attorney
is
here-
miss
doucet
and
her
partner.
I
However,
in
an
abundance
of
caution
and
based
on
the
advice
of
legal
counsel,
I
am
going
to
recuse
myself
from
participation
and
voting
on
this
matter
this
evening
to
eliminate
even
the
appearance
of
any
conflict.
Thank
you,
mr
mcweeny.
Thank
you,
mr
set,
mr
chairman,
I'll
recuse,
myself
I'll
file,
the
appropriate
paperwork
next
week
and
y'all
have
a
good
evening.
A
Mr
shelby,
I
know
there's
some
situations
that
are
going
on.
I
want
you
to
get
with
the
city
attorney.
You
know.
Mr
mclean
comes
before
us
a
lot
and
I
want
a
legal
opinion.
I
don't
want
to
be
missing
out
on
council
members
on
votes,
so
I
need
to
get
an
opinion
from
you
and
the
legal
department.
So
we
won't
continue
to
have
this
when
mr
mikulini
comes
before
this
council.
D
R
Miss
mr
shelby,
you
know
whatever
our
decision
is
for
against
an
applicant,
there
always
could
be
litigation
to
to
argue
that
people
are
biased.
R
If,
if
a
in,
in
a
situation
where
I
have
not
faced
the
situation
since
I've
been
here,
but
in
a
situation
where
someone
files
a
lawsuit
against
one
of
our
colleagues,
is
there
any
case
study
that
that
would
potentially
imply
that
any
case
law
that
would
potentially
imply
that
that
that
cast
some
kind
of
cloud
over
the
entire
body?
D
D
So
I
the
question
would
then
be
barring
anybody
able
to
or
wanting
to
state
tonight
that
they
are
unable
to
be
fair
and
impartial.
The
presumption
is
that
you
can
be,
and
you
will
go
forward
with
this
hearing,
so
it
is
the
opportunity
for
you.
R
My
question
is:
more
is
not
about
individual
our
perception
advice,
because
I
don't
think
any
of
us
would
be
sitting
here
if
we
thought
we
would
be
biased,
but
the
the
question
is
someone
for
against
a
project
could
come
after
the
fact
and
say
that
there
was.
There
was
some
kind
of
cloud
over
the
entire
body
because
of
a
particular
situation,
and
so
it
do.
Are
you
aware
of
any
case
law,
or
should
we
ask
you.
R
A
D
A
As
the
chairman
of
this
council
I've,
given
my
instruction
to
get
mrs
grimes
and
look
at
the
ramifications
of
mr
carlson's
question
as
well
as
and
also
as
pertaining
to
mr
ding
fella
with
mr
mccolliny's
cases,
so
we
can
get
some
answers
on
that,
sir.
Yes,
sir,
all
right,
let's
proceed.
E
Thank
you,
council
annie
barnes
development
coordination.
Item
number
11
is
rec
2099.
The
subject
property
is
located
at
202
north
armenia
avenue.
The
request
is
to
rezone
the
property
from
rm16
residential
multifamily
to
plane,
development
to
allow
development
of
medical
and
business
professional
office
uses
I'll
turn
over
the
presentations
planning,
commission
and
after
their
presentation.
I'll
conclude
mine.
L
Thank
you,
annie,
jennifer
malone,
the
planning
commission
rec
2099.
This
is
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district
within
the
west,
tampa
urban
village
and
the
armory
gardens
neighborhood.
There's
a
transit
stop
adjacent
to
the
subject
site.
It
is
located
within
a
level
d.
L
Evacuation
zone
and
bella
brothers
park
is
the
closest
park,
approximately
a
quarter
mile
to
the
north
of
the
subject
site:
here's
the
aerial
the
subject
size
outlined
in
purple,
so
it's
just
north
of
kennedy,
boulevard
kind
of
at
the
corner
of
armenia
avenue
as
west
north
a
street
I've
pointed
out.
Some
of
the
offices
are
already
within
the
surrounding
area.
To
the
east
of
the
site
are
some
single-family
detached
homes?
L
The
future
land
use
is
residential.
20.
to
the
east
of
the
site
is
community
next
is
35.
So
that's
what
those
offices
were
developed
under
and
then
further
south
is
urban
next
to
260.
That's
that
purple
color
that
runs
along
west
kennedy
boulevard,
so
the
residential
20
future.
Ladies
designation,
does
allow
limited
neighborhoods
serving
commercial
uses
if
they
are
consistent
with
the
locational
criteria
within
the
comprehensive
plan.
So
this
is
the
zoning
was
already
was
residential.
L
Multi-Family
16.,
the
planning
commission
staff
had
to
review
the
site
to
make
sure
that
it
was
consistent
with
that
commercial
locational
criteria.
We
had
determined
that
it
does
meet
the
criteria
for
consideration
for
commercial
uses,
because
the
subject
site
is
adjacent
to
an
arterial
roadway.
That's
north
armenia
avenue
and
vehicular
access
would
not
intrude
upon
the
existing
residential
neighborhood
located
to
the
west
of
the
site.
L
Again,
this
portion
of
north
armenia
contains
several
office
uses,
so
there
is
a
precedent
for
that
here
and
it
definitely
transitions
to
a
mixture
of
office
and
residential
uses,
and
so
we
have
determined
that
this
proposed
office
used
to
be
comparable,
comparable
compatible
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
in
scale
with
the
surrounding
area,
and
I
would
also
note
that
the
applicant
has
proposed
the
square
footage
of
400
for
4
411
square
feet,
square
foot,
medical
office
building
and
that
is
within
the
floor
area.
Ratio
of
0.5,
that's
allowable
within
the
residential
20
27.
L
E
E
The
applicant
is
requesting
four
waivers
for
the
first
waiver
is
requested
to
reduce
the
backup
width
from
six
feet
to
four
point:
four
one
feet.
The
second
waiver
is
to
reduce
the
required
eight
foot
landscape
buffer
to
five
feet
to
the
east
of
the
property.
The
third
waiver
requested
is
to
reduce
the
required
15
foot
buffer
and
six
foot
masonry
wall
alum
along
the
west
and
north
property
line
to
five
feet
and
a
six
foot
masonry
wall.
The
fourth
waiver
requested
is
to
reduce
the
required
parking
from
25
parking
spaces
to
18
spaces.
E
These
are
elevations
provided
by
the
applicant
shown.
Here
is
an
aerial
map
in
the
surrounding
zoning.
There
are
residential
and
office
uses
in
the
immediate
area,
property
directly,
west
and
north
of
the
subject.
Site
are
zoned,
rm16
and
developed
with
residential
uses,
property
directly,
east
and
south
of
the
subject.
Site
are
zoned,
cg,
commercial
and
developed
with
office
uses
here's
a
current
a
picture
of
the
current
building
on
the
subject
site
shown
here
is
a
picture
of
the
property
directly
east
and
across
north
armenia
avenue.
E
Shown
here
is
properly
located
south
of
the
subject
site
and
across
west
north
a
street,
and
this
is
a
picture
further
along
west
north,
a
street
properties
surrounding
the
subject
site
are
developed
with
residential
and
office
uses.
The
proposed
project
for
medical
and
business
professional
office
uses
are
compatible
with
the
existing
development
pattern,
with
the
requested
favor
waivers
could
create
an
adverse
impact
on
the
immediate
neighborhood.
E
J
O
Good
evening,
council,
steve
michelini,
you
may
those
of
you
who
are
familiar
with
this
area
know
that
this
was
dr
valente's
medical
office.
It
was
zoned
rm16,
which
was
an
existing
non-conforming
use.
It
was
built
in
1965
and
I
just
want
to
go
through
a
couple
of
the
pictures,
and
I
know
that
that
annie
pointed
out
a
couple
of
things
about
being
inconsistent.
O
However,
my
my
discussion
with
you
is
if
the
medical
office
was
inconsistent
and
created
an
adverse
impact,
it
it's
been
there
for
56
years
and
that
adverse
impact
would
have
been
established,
or
at
least
been
at
that
point.
O
It
would
have
occurred
many
years
ago,
the
the
property,
the
property
is
bordered
on
the
north
side
by
these,
these
oak
trees
and
another
commercial
use.
So
we're
asking
for
a
reduction
in
the
buffer
for
the
most
part
to
accommodate
the
trees
and
the
fact
that
the
parking
for
the
adjacent
commercial
use
is
a
me.
Is
it
directly
on
the
property
line
it
so
there's
not
going
to
be
any
adverse
impact
regarding
the
buffer
waiver
on
the
on
the
north
side
of
the
of
the
property.
O
O
O
O
O
Thank
you.
I
don't
see
this
right
now,
but
I'll
find
it.
The
property
to
the
west
is
is
a
residence,
but
their
driveway
in
their
garage
sits
right
on
the
property
line
and
so
the
reduction
of
the
the
reduction
of
the
buffer
on
the
west
side,
where
they
have
no
masonry
wall
now
there
will
be
a
masonry
wall.
O
O
O
O
We
have,
we
notified
it.
Everyone,
as
in
accordance
with
the
code
I
received
one
letter
I
actually
received
one
phone
call
asking
me
about
what
was
being
proposed
there
and
when
we
indicated
it
was
a
replacement
first
to
vest
the
existing
medical
use.
That
was
there
and
second
to
in
the
future,
build
a
new
medical
office.
Building
the
backup
waiver
that's
being
requested
is
internal
to
the
site.
N
O
O
O
As
the
staff
has
noted,
the
planning
commission
is
supporting
this
and
finds
it
consistent.
I
believe
that
the
the
city
staff's
objections,
as
I
said
it's
an
existing
medical
office.
The
impact
of
this
would
have
occurred
back
50
some
odd
years
ago.
If
there
was
going
to
be
an
adverse
impact,
each
of
the
corners
going
north
from
here
and
south
all
the
way
to
kennedy
are
characterized
with
medical
or
business
and
professional
offices
law
offices.
O
O
Or
the
front
would
be
five
feet,
the
rear
would
be
9.4
feet,
the
side,
five
feet
on
the
north
side
and
five
and
ten
feet
on
the
south
side.
The
landscape,
buffers
being
proposed
at
the
front
would
be
five
rear.
Five
side,
five
and
south
would
be
eight.
O
O
This
is
for
a
scheduled,
outpatient
type
surgery
office
for
a
cardiologist
and,
as
I
said
to
you,
that
we
did
the
study
with
the
other
properties
and
their
utilization,
and
we've
submitted
this
to
the
city
already,
and
this
is
the
this
is
the
chart
which
they
have,
which
shows
the
utilization,
and
we
believe
that
the
the
18
spaces
we're
providing
will
be
adequate
for
this.
This
particular
use.
This
is
a
single
doctor
and
his
wife
practitioners.
O
This
is
not
a
multi-doctor
medical
office
is
being
proposed,
we're
in
the
we're
on
the
edge
of
the
west
tampa
the
west
tampa
district
and,
as
such,
we'll
have
to
meet
certain
design,
elevation
requirements
for
the
facade,
and
we
believe
that,
considering
all
of
the
factors
involved
that
we
have
met
the
intent
and
the
character
that's
necessary
for
the
code.
Let
me
run
through
a
couple
of
other
things
that
that
we
have
to
you
have
to
meet.
O
O
O
O
It's
one
of
the
few
corners
that
has
not
been
redeveloped
and,
along
that
stretch
of
armenia,
so
we're
not
introducing
any
new
any
new
development
pattern.
Here,
it's
an
existing
one
and
we
believe
that
any
impact
adverse
that
would
have
been
present
there
had
already
occurred
many
years
ago,
promote
in
a
more
desirable
living
and
working
environments.
O
O
Also
in
terms
of
the
far
the
development
intensity
of
the
site.
There
was
a
question
raised
by
staff
that
we
accommodate
and
meet
that
requirement,
and
we
clarified
that
with
our
engineer
and
and
our
site
plan
and
those
corrections
have
been
made.
A
C
We're
still
not
saying
it.
Thank
you
very
much,
comparatively
speaking,
these
two
four
six
seven
locations
relative
to
what
you're
asking
for
what
what
you're
petitioning
for
were
these
all
built
recently,
and
these
parking
requirements
are
the
same
as
what
this
location
is.
C
O
Well,
the
most
recent
one
is
2019,
which
was
4.12
spaces,
that
they
were
providing
per
thousand
square
feet
and
we're
proposing
4.81,
which
is
higher
than
that.
The
other
ones
are
existing.
O
C
O
E
A
H
E
No
problem
so
so
the
office
use
would
not
be
allowed
by
wright
in
an
rm16
zoning
district.
So
in
order
to
determine
if
it's
a
legal
non-conforming
use
to
the
north,
a
formal
decision
would
need
to
be
made
on
from
the
zoning
administrator
saving
that.
O
If
I
could
respond
to
that
council,
we
don't
own
that
property.
I
was
only
pointing
out
that
it's
a
commercial
design
studio
and
normally
you
would
have
a
15
foot
buffer,
we're
proposing
a
six
foot
masonry
wall
along
that
side
and
a
reduction
to
five
feet
and,
as
I
showed
you
on
the
photographs,
that's
a
very
difficult
buffer
to
deal
with
because
of
all
those
oak
trees.
O
O
There
we
go,
we
have
a
number
of
multi
trunk
oak
trees
right
there
and
that's
that
sits
right
on
the
property
line
and
the
other
property
it
its
parking
is,
is
angled
and
sits
right
on
the
property
line
coming
from
the
north
side
facing
south.
O
So
we're
not
asking
we're
not
trying
to
vest
their
property.
We're
not
asking
for
anything
in
that
regard,
but
we
are
asking
for
the
reduction
in
the
buffer.
J
I
I
believe,
that's
now
that
I
could
miss
some
mesquelco
help.
Me
will
get
my
bearing
straight.
I
believe
that
that
just
this
property
we're
talking
about
the
rezoning
here,
foul
rec
20-99,
it's
just
north
there's
an
alleyway,
and
then
you
got
the
tampa
general
outpatient
clinic
there.
I
believe.
Am
I
correct?
Yes,.
O
A
H
A
A
All
right,
let
me
just
speak
more
closely.
Mr
miranda
seconded
it
all
in
favor
all
right
all
right,
mr
brother,
what's
the
state,
mr
miranda,
can
you
do
it
honestly.
J
Prime
minister,
chairman
file,
number
eleven
problem:
number
rev
20-99
orders
be
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
ordinance,
re-zoning
property
general
vicinity
of
202
north
armenia
avenue
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
rm16
residential
multi-family
to
pd
plan
development
office,
medical
business,
professional,
providing
an
effective
date.
J
As
far
as
the
waivers
under
section
27-139-4,
the
design
of
the
proposed
development
is
unique
and
therefore
in
need
of
waivers,
the
requested
waivers
would
not
substantially
interfere
or
injure
the
rights
of
others
whose
property
would
be
affected
by
the
waivers
under
the
development
code.
Section
27
136,
the
proposed
development
has
shown
on
the
site
plan,
promotes
encouraging
development
that
is
appropriate
in
location
character
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
neighbors,
who
propose
use,
promotes
the
effective
and
substantial
use
of
land
and
infrastructure.
J
The
proposed
zoning
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
its
surrounding
development
patterns,
promote
a
range
of
uses
in
close
proximity
to
each
other
pursuant
to
the
land
use
policy
1.2.8
and
the
proposed
rezoning
achieves
land
use
policy
9.3,
which
encourages
areas
adjacent
or
within
neighborhoods
that
are
planned
for
non-residential
use
to
be
developed
in
a
manner
that
is
sensitive
and
compatible
to
the
effective
neighborhood.
Second,.
D
O
H
A
All
right,
we've
come
to
that
time.
Mr
vieira.
H
Yes,
sir,
just
one,
if
I
may
december
2nd
what
does
our
agenda
look
like
that
day,
mr
shelby
and
mr
chair,
I
I
was
wanting
to
make
a
motion
to
give
a
tampa
city
council
commendation
to
dr
jason
wilson,
who
a
lot
of
us
know
is
such
a
fine
gentleman
has
been
such
a
great
advocate
for
safety
and
responsibility
whenever
it
comes
to
covet
19.
H
R
Yes,
just
one
quickly,
I
met
yesterday
with
the
national
defense
industry
association.
I
don't
know
if
you
all
have
met
with
them.
Yet
it's
a
group
that
that
I've
been
in
around
for
a
while
here,
but
you
know
every
10
years
or
so.
Brac
comes
up
regarding
mcdill
and
it's
not
apparently
coming
up
right
now,
but
every
time
I
think
I've
been
through
three
cycles
now
with
the
chamber
chamber,
always
mobilizes
for
it.
R
R
R
So
I
would
propose,
if
you're
all
okay
with
that
then
maybe
january
13th,
that
we
would
ask
them
to
give
a
ask
the
national
defense
industry
association
to
give
a
presentation
up
to
10
minutes,
starting
at
nine
o'clock.
Miss.
A
D
Mr
chairman,
with
regard
to
the
the
motion,
I
would
just
perhaps
suggests
there's
presently
no
ceremonial
or
presentation
set.
Did
you
say
for
january
13th.
R
D
R
D
Well,
the
question:
the
question
is
whether
it's
going
to
be
council's
decisions
to
move
presentations
and
the
like
to
different
different
options.
So,
rather
than
set
it
now,
we
can
wait
a
week
if
you
want
to
and
council
changes
its
mind
or
makes
a
decision,
then
we're
going
to
have
to
perhaps
move
them.
But
I
I
I'm
just
seeing
now,
as
we
move
into
the
coming
year,
we're
only
a
few
days
away
from
from
at
least.
R
A
All
right
and
again,
I
do
see
this
point.
You
know
we're
going
to
recognize
those
folks
and
get
them
here.
We
need,
we
need
them
to
speak,
but
you
know
monday.
We
got
monday
coming
up
and
that
way
we
can
kind
of
know
where
we're
going
to
go
for
the
first
year.
I
mean
we
don't
want
to
bump
your
people
with
that
motion.
We
got
to
change
it,
so
I
can
see
where
mr
shelby's
going.
D
Mr
chairman,
respectfully
I
just
point
out
that
it
looks
like
december
16th,
which
is
the
last
meeting
of
the
year
for
you.
You
have
no
night
meeting
and
you
have
accommodation
for
police
officer
of
the
month,
but
I
believe
that's
your
only
presentation
or
commendation
set
for
december.
So
if
that's
doable
councilman
mr
golson.
R
C
C
You
know
I.e
if
funding
does
come
through
for
our
streetcar
extension
with
hopes.
We
can
promote
that
and
I
would
like
to
have
that
if
we
could
mr
chair
on
december
16th.
A
Can
I
make
a
friendly
amendment?
Did
I
say,
surely
we've
been
getting
a
lot
of
calls
about
parking
in
the
downtown
area
and
some
of
the
other
areas
in
reference
to
some
folks
can
reserve
spots
and
so
folks
can't
reserve
spots
at
several
calls
from
some
businesses
and
so
forth.
So
if
mr
people
can
get
a
report
on
that
on
the
policy
on
the
reserve
parking
spaces
that
are
utilized
by
citizens
or
how
they're
paid
for
or
whatever
policy
we
do
have
or
if
there's
a
policy
that
needs
to
be
made,
but.
A
All
right,
mr
crosston
seconded
it
all
in
favor
aye.
Are
you
opposed.
C
J
Our
son,
I
know
and
thank
you,
mr
chairman,
I
I
just
want
to
say
a
little
shout
out
to
the
tampa
bay
rays.
It's
you
know,
you
fall
short
a
little
bit,
but
then
you
look
at
what
they've
done
and
and
I'm
not
a
baseball
expert.
Oh
man
come
on
you.
No,
I
haven't
you
would.
J
And
the
little
knowledge
that
I
have
no
organization
in
the
last
10
years,
maybe
even
more
than
that,
have
done
what
they've
done
with
the
payroll
that
they
have
and
how
they
bring
up
young
individuals
and
make
them
what
they
are.
It's
the
molding,
not
the
salaries,
but
it's
the
cohesiveness
of
a
group
working
together.
When
you
talk
about
any
business
and
baseball
and
football
and
hockey
and
soccer
and
basketball
they're
all
businesses.
Just
like
anything
else,
I
don't
think
there's
any
team
in
all
of
baseball.
J
J
Still,
winning
more
games
is
what
he's
losing
and
if
you
look
at
waka
and
you
look
at
wayne
right,
their
mentality
is
the
same
in
pitching
and
the
batters
that
they
have
they
bring
in
people
that
were
not
discarded
or
not
approved,
of
or
whatever
reason,
arenda,
rosa
and
and
the
young
kid
that
started
baseball
when
he
was
16
he's
not
even
21
he's
going
to
be
an
animal
playing
the
way
he
hits
and
the
way
he
runs
and
the
mentality
that
he
has
towards
the
game
he's
a
shortstop
now,
but
I
see
what
he
does
but
he's
a
fantastic
player,
and
you
see
guys
that
not
built
no
bigger
than
you
and
I
and
they're
hitting
30
home
runs
35
hormone
39
home
runs.
J
They
had
a
catcher
who
couldn't
hit
his
weight
at
one
time
and
he
hit
like
30
home
runs.
So
it's
not
all
about
home
runs
it's
working
together
and
if
you
work
together
and
stay
together,
you're
going
to
win
more
than
you're
going
to
lose,
and
I
have
to
give
a
shout
to
the
organization
on
the
other
side.
A
A
Game,
oh
yeah,
oh
yeah,
all
right!
Well,
we
wish
to
raise
good
luck
next
year
and
they
can
keep
the
payroll
there
and
keep
the
people
there.
We
could
be
get
a
championship
world
series
team
all
the
way
with
a
presentation
soon
anything
else,
sir.
That's
it!
Mr
shelby
anything,
sir.