►
From YouTube: TCC PM 9/22/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
C
Thank
you.
Mr
chairman,
the
public
and
the
citizens
of
Tampa
are
able
to
watch,
listen
and
view
this
meeting
on
Spectrum
Channel,
640,
Frontier,
channel
15
and
on
the
internet
at
tampa.gov
forward.
Slash
live
stream.
Now
members
of
the
public
May
participate
here
at
City
council's
Chambers
at
315,
East,
Kennedy
Boulevard
on
the
third
floor,
or
virtually
through
video
teleconferencing
referred
to
by
Florida
Statutes
and
rules
as
Communications
media
technology.
C
Now
pre-registration
is
necessary
to
participate
virtually
in
a
public
hearing
on
a
quasi-judicial
or
legislative
matter
and
for
more
information
about
the
ability
to
participate
in
the
meetings
via
CMT,
including
schedules,
a
link
to
registrations
and
forms.
You
can
see
tampa.gov
forward,
slash
quasi,
that's
q-u-a-s-I.
Now
in
order
to
participate
via
CMT
in
quasi-judicial
matters,
you
must
have
access
to
a
Communications
media
device
such
as
a
tablet
or
a
computer
equipped
with
a
camera
and
a
microphone
that
will
enable
enable
you
to
be
seen
by
video
and
heard
on
audio
by
the
city
council.
C
D
A
A
D
E
Sir,
there
is
room
on
October
27th.
A
C
A
F
E
There
are
two
items
here
that
have
been
withdrawn:
please
remove
the
agenda
first
off
number
14
on
the
agenda
or
is
the
22-56.
E
And
then
also,
please
remove
from
the
agenda
number
15
Rez
22-63
over
the
lotto
withdrawal.
E
Last
there
is
a
misnotice
for
agenda
item
number
18,
that's
res
22-80,.
C
E
And
then
also
there
are
a
few
items
here
on
the
agenda
that
are
related
to
each
other,
so
they
should
please
be
heard
together
for
City
council's
pleasure.
First
off
number
one
on
the
agenda
would
go
with
number
16
and
number
seven,
so
that's
ta,
CPA
22-03
is
requested
to
go
with
vac
22-16
and
also
Rez
22-71
German.
E
Another
related
agenda
item
agenda.
Item
number
two
ta
CPA
22-09
has
been
related
to
number
11
on
the
agenda,
which
would
be
Rez
22-14.
E
Aye
and
the
last
related
item
is
number
five
and
number
six
vac
22-10
and
the
other
number
is
Rez
22-42.
It's
your
pleasure.
A
C
Council,
thank
you,
Mr
chairman
and
just
a
reminder.
Council.
When
you
do
hear
these
together,
please
be
reminded
that
the
votes
will
be
have
to
be
taken
separately
and
they
will
be
taken
in
a
certain
order.
For
instance,
let's
say
the
comp
plan
would
be
heard
first,
because
that
is
a
legislative
matter.
C
It
is
quasi-judicial,
it
is
a
public
policy
matter
and
that
has
its
own
criteria,
for
you
being
able
to
approve
or
disapprove
the
second,
let's
say
would
be
the
vacate
and
the
third
one
would
be
the
rezoning
and
again
that
relies
on
competent,
substantial
evidence
within
the
record
and
because
they
have
different
burdens.
I
just
ask
that
you
refer
to
the
criteria
upon
which
you
have
to
make
your
decisions.
Thank
you.
A
G
H
Jennifer
Malone
at
the
Planning
Commission
item
number
one:
correct,
tacpa,
2203.
F
I
just
want
to
for
I
want
to
disclose
ex
parte
communication
this
afternoon,
I
received
I,
don't
know
if
it's
this
item,
or
maybe
7
or
16,
but
this
afternoon
I
received
several
emails
regarding
a
a
venue
called
House
of
Shadows
and
I
I
simply
responded
to
the
people
to
say:
I
can't
respond
to
you
and
I
copied
the
Quasi
box,
but
just
to
notify
that
every
all
the
parties
that
it,
although
it
was
in
the
Quasi
box
late
that
I
I,
did
put
it
in
just
after
I,
saw
it
this
afternoon.
F
It
came
in
today.
Secondly,
the
the
emails
reference,
the
Tampa
Arts
Alliance
I'm,
a
founding
sponsor
and
board
member
of
the
Tampa
Arts
Alliance
I
made
a
several
emails
mentioned,
Tampa
Arts
Alliance,
so
I
made
a
short
call
to
the
Tampa
Arts
Alliance
to
see
if
they
had
done
any
advocacy
regarding
any
real
estate
issues,
and
they
said
no,
but
the
fact
that
I
am
involved
with
the
Tampa
Arts
Alliance
at
that.
F
If
the
applicant
wants
to
conflict
me
out,
they
can
but
I
just
wanted
to
disclose
that
I
have
had
no
substantive
conversations
with
anybody,
but
but
I
just
want
to
disclose.
I
am
of
all
the
Tampa
Arts,
Alliance
and-
and
some
folks
mentioned
that,
although
they're
not
involved
in
it,
if
the
applicant
would
like
me
to
accuse
myself,
I
can't
otherwise
I
don't
see
a
conflict
that
I
don't
think
I
would
be
biased
in
any
way.
F
C
In
this
case,
yes-
and
you
don't
see
any
perceived
conflict
that
you
wish-
okay,
very
good,
okay,
the
other
thing
council
is
a
reminder
that
if
you
have
any
verbal
Communications
that
have
yet
to
be
disclosed
with
regard
to
what
you
did
Council,
my
understanding
is
that
Tanya
Wilcox
in
our
office
has
been
very
diligent
in
making
sure
things
are
uploaded
as
soon
as
they
can
remind
people
that
there
is
a
deadline
and
to
not
please
use
emails,
to
communicate
to
city
council
during
a
public
hearing
and
for
those
people
who
are
online.
C
Please
do
not
use
the
chat
box
to
do
anything
other
than
to
address
technical
issues.
Please
do
not
use
those
to
communicate
any
substantive
matters
related
to
the
hearings.
Thank
you
and
if
there
are
again
any
ex
parte
verbal
Communications
Council
that
you
wish
to
disclose
prior
to
the
start
of
that
particular
hearing,
please
disclose
with
whom
it
happened,
and
the
sum
and
substance
of
that
communication.
Thank
you.
I
I
believe
we
all
received
them
and
forwarded
them
to
quasibox.
I,
don't
know
about
all
of
them,
but
I
received
some
and
so
I
know.
Kelly
sent
some
to
the
Quasi
box
yeah.
A
F
Thank
you.
The
reason
why
I
in
particular
mention
is
because
they're
dressed
to
me
most
of
them
are
dressed
to
me
but
copy
all
of
city
council,
but
they're
all
in
the
Quasi
box,
so
everybody
has
access
to
them.
Now.
C
A
I
have
just
received
noticed
that
councilman
VR
will
not
be
attending
virtually.
So,
as
you
can
see,
there
are
five
of
us
here.
A
A
D
And
it's
up
to
them
to
make
that
decision,
that
we've
done
them
before
with
five
and
then
there's
been
some
objection
with
five,
so
we
had
a
cartel
goes
to
another
date.
But
if
he's
coming
in
in
a
few
minutes,
I
I
would
imagine
that
we'll
have
six.
Maybe
we
can
take
those
that
are
not
controversial.
They
are
going
to
be
controversial,
so
one
would
be
here.
F
Councilman
Carlson
can
I
just
ask
somebody
from
legal.
Is
it
we've
had
cases
where
we
went
through
the
whole
case
and
at
the
end,
because
of
the
numbers
that
the
applicant
asked
for
a
continuance?
Is
it
possible
because
legal
tell
us,
is
it
possible
to
ask
the
applicants
to
make
that
decision
before
we
hear
the
case?
Can
they
if
they
object
to
us
only
having
five
or
six
people
can
they
can
we
just
get
them
to
commit
before
we
hear
it
instead
of
hearing
the
whole
thing
and
then
asking
for
a
continuance.
G
Thank
you,
Kate
Wells,
for
the
record.
If
the
request
for
continuance
is
because
we
do
not
have
a
full
Council
I
would
ask
the
applicants
to
make
that
request
at
the
beginning
and
not
after
they've
gone
through
the
entire
public
hearing
and
then
debated
whether
or
not
they
want
a
decision
tonight
or
not.
So
it
would
be
appropriate
to
take
that
up.
Perhaps
now.
A
D
G
I
may
suggest,
if
there
are
any
applicants
present
this
evening,
that
would
like
to
request
a
continuance,
because
we
don't
have
a
full
Council.
Perhaps
they
could
line
up,
you
can
take
those
requests
instead
of
having
to
open
H1
and
then
seeing
whether
or
not
it's
controversial.
C
So
that
council's
aware
that
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
read
the
rule
just
so
that
the
people
are
aware
and
certainly
counsel
refresh
your
recollection.
If
at
a
quasi-judicial
hearing,
only
four
members
of
council
are
available
to
take
action,
then
any
petitioner
shall
have
the
right
to
continue
the
matter
until
there
are
a
minimum
of
five
members.
If
there
is
less
than
a
full
Council,
then
a
petitioner
May
request
to
continue
a
matter,
but
it
will
not
be
as
a
matter
of
right.
A
F
Tell
me
if
you
disagree
with
this,
but
I
would
move.
I
would
make
a
motion
that
we
ask
petitioners
to
now
tell
us
whether
they
would
like
a
continuance
and
that
we
will
We
since
it's
not
by
right.
We
will.
We
will
grant
The
Continuous
if
they
request
it
now.
A
Consecutive
by
councilman
Miranda,
all
in
favor
aye
no
motion
passes.
A
D
D
In
other
words,
it's
up
to
the
petitioners,
the
letters
know
I've
always
been
the
pass
I'm,
not
saying.
Well,
you
have
to
do
it,
we
all
for
the
courtesy
to
let
them
if
they
want
to
hear
we're
fine,
we're
here
with
five,
and
this
is
public
record.
They
can't
go
on
and
place
a
lawsuit
or
whatever
and.
C
Again,
Mr
before
you
recognize
the
council
member
Carlson's
follow-up
on
council
member
Miranda,
you
also
do
have
that
policy.
When
it's
for
council
members,
then
you
do
it
as
a
matter
of
right.
If
it's,
if
it's
five
six,
then
what
happens?
Is
you
also
allow
the
public,
who
might
also
show
up
to
be
able
to
give
testimony
the
opportunity
to
object
to
that?
So
Council
has
to
weigh
that
when
it
makes
its
decision
and.
A
Again,
one
second
Mr
councilman
Carlson
I
just
got
hand
to
know
it's
going
to
be
15
minutes.
So
if
somebody
comes
up
here
now
where
their
their
agenda
item
is
last
on
the
list,
they
say.
No,
we
don't
want
we're.
Gonna
we're
going
to
wait
till
we
have
a
full
Council.
They
walk
out
the
door,
councilman
Goods
walks
in
what
is
what
is
the
reason
for
doing
that?
My.
C
D
F
Yeah
I
I
agree
with
councilmember
Miranda,
but
the
the
other
thing
is
I
just
want
folks
to
know
that
number
one
I
don't
want
to
hear
an
hour-long
case
and
at
the
end
of
it,
have
somebody
ask
for
continue
so
I
want
the
decision
to
be
made
now.
F
Instead,
number
two
we've
got
members
of
the
public
here
and
it's
not
fair
to
them
to
have
them
sit
three
or
four
hours
and
then
and
then
suddenly
at
the
beginning
of
it
that
that
they
find
out
that
they
can't
comment
because
it's
going
to
be
continued.
So
that's
why
I
wanted
to
push
to
do
it
now.
So
anyway,
we've
gotten.
A
J
J
J
J
This
is
a
photo
Facing
East
along
West
Cypress
Street.
The
subject
side
is
out
of
frame
to
the
right
from
here.
J
J
This
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
The
subject
site
is
outlined
in
black
and
it's
represented
by
the
brownish
color,
which
is
residential
20..
You
can
see
in
the
area
that
to
the
east
is
residential
20
to
the
West
along
Cypress,
Avenue,
Cypress,
Street,
sorry,
Ace
Community
makes
use
35
and
further
to
the
South
and
North
is
residential
10.
J
These
are
the
potential
impacts
the
site
would
allow
for
an
increase
in
the
number
of
allowed
dwelling
units
and
the
maximum
square
footage.
Currently,
the
site
can
be
considered
for
12
dwelling
units
and
slightly
under
14
000
square
feet
of
non-residential
uses
in
the
residential
20..
Under
the
proposed
CMU
35,
the
site
can
be
considered
for
a
maximum
of
22
dwelling
units
or
slightly
over
55
500
square
feet
of
residential
or
non-residential
uses.
The
proposed
CMU
35
would
also
introduce
the
CG
zoning
category.
J
Planning
Commission
staff
has
reviewed
the
request
and
found
it
consistent
with
multiple
aspects
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
The
comprehensive
plan
has
policy
direction
that
seeks
to
protect
existing
residential
areas,
while
balancing
the
need
for
new
development
to
be
compatible
with
the
neighborhood
character.
Additionally.
The
comprehensive
plan
identifies
the
need
to
designate
enough
land
for
housing
to
meet
the
needs
of
Tampa's
growing
population
and
consider
the
development
of
mixed-use
areas
that
can
accommodate
local
serving
commercial,
employment
and
entertainment
uses.
The
request
for
increased
density
and
intensity
will
meet
this
policy
Direction,
while
balancing
the
neighborhood
character.
J
The
comprehensive
plan
seeks
to
protect
Planning
Commission
staff,
finds
the
proposed
request
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
neighborhood
based
on
the
surrounding
area
surrounding
land
use
pattern
in
the
Planning
Commission
recommended
that
the
proposed
map
Amendment
be
found
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
Imagine
2040
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
This
concludes
my
presentation.
A
K
We
got
a
unanimous
decision
from
the
Planning
Commission
and,
lastly,
we
are
going
to
have
to
come
back
depending
on
what
change
we
end
up,
making
which
the
develop
the
my
my
client
is
in
the
process
of
determining
we're
working
with
the
neighborhood
association
and
the
neighbors
to
make
sure
what
we
come
up
with
does
not
negatively
impact
the
residential
character
of
the
neighborhood
surrounding
us
and
the
intent
is
to
provide
potentially
office
and
residential
combined
we're
not
looking
to
put
a
55
000
square
foot
Department
building
on
this
site,
because
it's
just
not
appropriate
one
and
two:
it's
not
really
what
the
market
would
bear
in
that
area
and,
lastly,
we're
going
to
have
to
come
back
before
Council
for
rezoning,
depending
on
what
we
we
end
up
coming
with
up
with
for
a
plan.
A
Remain
some
questions
for
the
record.
Please
state
your
name,
sorry
about
that
Joseph
birkelmeyer.
Thank
you.
A
F
B
L
L
Thomas
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff,
this
is
TA
CPA
2211
at
2502,
2504,
North,
Boulevard
and
702
West
Columbus
Drive.
L
L
Here
is
an
aerial
view
of
the
subject
site
you
can
see
it
highlighted
in
yellow
and
outlined
in
red,
it's
bordered
by
West,
Columbus,
Drive
and
North
Boulevard,
and
it
is
within
the
Ridgewood
Park
neighborhood
within
the
Ridgewood
Park
neighborhood.
It's
mainly
single
family
homes.
When
you
head
farther
west,
you
can
get
to
the
Hillsborough
River,
then,
on
the
other
side
of
North
Boulevard
is
Tampa
Heights
and
Tampa
Heights
Urban
Village.
L
Once
you
cross
the
North
Boulevard,
you
have
a
development
pattern
that
changes
a
little
bit
to
more
mixed-use
or
not
mixed
use
mixed
use.
Once
you
get
south
of
Ross
Avenue,
but
north
of
Ross
Avenue,
it's
a
mix
of
housing
densities.
You
have
multi-family
single-family,
detached
and
single
family
attached
and
then
just
three
blocks
south
of
there,
where
West
Palm
is,
is
the
highest
development.
But
you
all
are
familiar
with.
L
L
L
Here
is
a
map
of
the
adopted
future
land
use.
As
you
can
see,
the
the
CERN
the
site
right
now
has
kind
of
a
mix
of
land
uses.
The
site
is
made
up
of
three
Parcels,
so
this
first
parcel
here
is
split
between
CMU,
our
community
mixed
use,
35
and
the
residential
10..
L
L
And
here
is
a
proposed
future
land
use
map.
You
can
see
the
side,
the
full
parcel
that
fronts
Columbus
is
now
recognized
entirely
under
the
CME
35
and
then
the
two
smaller
Parcels
are
organized
under
the
residential
35
designation.
L
Foreign,
these
are
the
potential
impacts
of
the
request
currently
under
the
existing
future
land
use
designation,
the
site
can
be
considered
for
19
units
or
around
41
000
square
feet
of
non-residential
uses,
residential
or
non-residential
uses,
and
then
for
the
potential
requests
under
the
R35
and
CMU
35.
This
site
can
be
considered
for
29
units
or
around
51
000
square
feet
of
residential
or
non-residential
square
feet.
The
proposed
amendment
would
allow
for
additional
density
and
intensity
and
would
introduce
the
possibility
of
the
rm24
Office
Professional
and
Commercial
General
zoning
districts.
L
Planning
Commission
staff
reviewed
the
request
and
found
it
consistent
with
multiple
aspects
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
The
comprehensive
plan
has
policy
direction
that
seeks
to
protect
existing
residential
areas,
while
balancing
the
need
for
new
development
to
be
compatible
with
neighborhood
character.
Additionally.
The
comprehensive
plan
identifies
the
need,
designate
enough
land
for
housing
options
to
meet
the
needs
of
Tampa's
growing
population
and
to
consider
the
development
of
mixed-to-use
areas
in
all
districts
that
can
accommodate
local
serving
commercial,
employment
and
entertainment
uses.
L
The
requested
increase
in
density
and
intensity
will
meet
this
policy
Direction,
while
still
providing
a
balance
to
the
neighborhood
character
that
the
comprehensive
plan
seeks
to
protect.
The
comprehensive
plan
promotes
a
development
pattern
that
is
consistent
with
the
compact
settings
strategy,
which
encourages
mixed
use.
Infill
development
within
proximity
to
Transit
and
employment
service
Transit
is
located
adjacent
to
the
site
along
West
Columbus
Drive,
which
also
provides
employment
opportunities.
The
subject
site
is
located
on
the
edge
of
the
neighborhood
at
the
corner
of
two
arterial
roadways
and
three
blocks
north
of
the
Heights
development.
L
Due
to
the
subject
site's
location
to
employment
and
Transit,
the
site
will
maximize
the
existing
infrastructure
and
promote
additional
housing
opportunities
on
an
underutilized
Parcels,
increasing
the
density
and
intensity
that
supports
walking
and
Transit.
That
is
consistent
with
several
objectives
and
policies
that
promote,
encourage
that
promote
and
encourage
new
infill
development
on
underutilized
land
and
promoting
housing
choices
within
proximity
to
employment
and
Civic
uses
and
Transit
corridors.
L
Sorry
I
meant
to
change
that
slide
based
on
those
finding
bindings.
The
Planning
Commission
recommends
that
the
proposed
map
Amendment
be
found
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
Imagine
2040
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
I'm
available
any
comments
or
questions
for
staff.
D
A
M
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr
chairman
I
have
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading
consideration
an
ordinance
amending
the
imagined,
2040
Tampa,
comprehensive
plan
for
future
land
use
element.
Future
land
use
map
for
the
property
located
at
2502
and
2504
North
Boulevard
from
residential
20
R20
and
residential
10
or
10
to
residential
35.
R35
and
Community
makes
use
35,
CMU
35,
providing
for
repeal
of
all
ordinances
in
Conflict,
providing
preservability
providing
an
effective
date.
A
A
B
A
B
J
A
J
Hear
it
okay,
thank
you!
So
much
Council,
again,
lashon
doc
development
coordination.
Council
item
number
five
is
the
vacating,
which
is
vac
2210
item
number:
six
is
the
rezoning
rez
2242.
This
is
for
the
applicant
is
Ashley
Glenn
land,
Holdings,
LLC
and
Adam
Hardin
and
being
represented
by
Catherine
Coyle.
The
request
is
to
rezone
the
property
from
rm24
and
rs50
residential
single
family
to
PD
for
multi-family,
residential
and
Commercial
uses,
and
just
a
reminder
to
council
just
to
show
you.
J
J
This
is
Cash
Street
to
the
South
and
Monroe
Street
this
this
actually
jogs
the
Western
Line.
But
that's
the
area
under
this
request.
The
direction
at
that
hearing
on
September
8th
was
for
the
applicant
to
conduct
Outreach
community
outreach
and
so
I'd
like
to
let
the
applicant
come
up
and
just
give
you
a
summary
of.
What's
been
accomplished
since
that
time,
since
this
request
also
has
an
Associated
vacating,
we
have
Ross
on
the
line.
Ross
Salmons
is
prepared
to
do
a
presentation
if
you
like
Council
or
we
can
move
to
Planning
Commission.
D
I'm
going
to
make
a
motion
open
all
the
hearings
for
a
second
items
number
one
through
how
many
do
we
have
18.
A
Motion
made
by
councilman
Miranda
sick
of
my
councilmanas
Coco,
all
in
favor
aye.
D
N
Good
evening
this
is
Danny
Collins
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff
as
well
Shawn
just
stated.
This
was
heard
at
your
hearing
on
September
8th
and
it
was
continued
to
tonight's
hearing.
There
have
been
no
changes
to
our
report
since
that
hearing
I
do
briefly
just
want
to
go
over
the
future
land
use
designations
of
the
subject
site.
N
This
is
the
subject
site
here.
It's
in
the
West
Tampa
Urban
Village
on
the
subject
site
is
recognized
under
Urban
mixed
use,
60
food
challenges,
designation
that
laws
development
up
to
60
billion
years
per
acre
or
up
to
a
3.25.
Far
like
I
stated,
there
has
been
no
revisions
to
our
reports
since
last
hearing
but
I'll
be
available
for
any
questions.
If
you
have
any.
K
All
of
the
participants
in
the
last
meeting,
as
well
as
additional
people
walking
the
streets
immediately
adjacent
to
the
development
as
well.
Mr
Hardin
has
emailed
the
majority
of
these
letters.
I
believe,
if
not
all
but
I
did
want
to
submit.
There
are
14
additional
letters
of
support.
K
Those
letters
include
Delphine
Jones,
who
spoke
at
the
last
meeting
representing
West
Riverfront
neighborhood
association,
which
is
the
most
nearly
affected
one,
which
is
the
one
we
actually
lie
within,
as
well
as
additional
residents
from
Oakhurst.
There
are
three
or
four
of
them
in
there
Tampa
prep
UT
as
before,
as
well
as
the
adjacent
some
of
those
adjacent
single
family
around
there
and
huge
and
live
on.
K
Cass
he's
done
an
amazing
job,
the
last
two
weeks,
and
we
do
appreciate
that
opportunity
to
go
out
and
speak
with
the
public
on
this
we're
available
for
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
We
agreed
previously
with
all
the
recommendations
from
staff
for
the
changes
to
the
site
plan
and
we
respectfully
request
your
approval.
I
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
for
going
out
and
speaking
with
the
public
I
appreciate
the
the
emails
that
we
got,
but
I
I
think
it
goes
a
long
way
and
I
I
really
appreciate
the
extra
effort.
Thank
you.
J
O
K
7Th
Avenue
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
I,
had
one
thing
I
wanted
to
add.
We
had
proffered
a
condition
to
require
the
developer,
to
provide
courtesy
notice
and
a
copy
of
each
incremental
plan
to
the
CAC.
K
A
B
K
K
And,
and
in
this
particular
case
I'm
good
with
this
word
because
I
believe
him-
it
is
worth
but
I
I
think
it's
a
really
really
important
policy
for
the
city,
allow
free,
zonings
and
such
without
any
plans
laying
out,
but
anyway,
I
I
support
this
project.
I.
P
A
M
You
think
also
Carlos
Ramirez,
2103
West
Carmen
just
wanted
to
report
from
the
West
Tampa
CRA
CAC
that
Mr
Hardin
did
come
and
present
at
our
infrastructure
subcommittee,
and
it
was
a
favorably
received.
I
also
wanted
to
say
on
behalf
of
the
north
Tech
art
Alliance
and
the
North
Bay
Park
civic
association.
We
discussed
it
and
we
are
now
in
support
of
the
Project
based
on
the
conditions
that
are
in
the
plans
and
our
conversations
with
Mr
Hart.
A
A
I
Ordinance
being
presented
for
KS,
reading
consideration
and
ordinance
in
the
city
of
Tampa,
Florida,
vacating
closing
discontinuing
and
abandoning
that
Alleyway
and
certain
parts
of
Cypress,
Avenue,
North,
Boulevard
and
Edison
Avenue
rights
of
way,
all
of
which
are
located
south
of
Arch
Street
north
of
Lemon
Street
West
of
North,
Boulevard
and
east
of
Delaware
Avenue
within
the
Platte
of
Knowles
subdivision
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Hillsborough,
County
Florida,
as
more
fully
described
in
section
2
here
of
subject
to
certain
covenants
conditions
and
restrictions
as
more
particularly
set
forth.
Herein.
A
F
D
A
B
A
D
Just
the
ordinance
okay,
chairman,
I'll,
read
this
and
then
I'll
read
the
the
items
that
were
listed
item
number
six
file,
number
Rez,
22-44
Learners
being
presented
for
first
read:
consideration
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
general
vicinity
of
904
1120,
North,
Boulevard,
909.
B
A
Just
including
yeah
here.
D
Compliance
with
lend
development
code,
section
127-136,
proposed
development
is
shown
on
site
plan,
promotes
and
encourage
development
that
is
appropriate
and
location,
character
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood
proposes
use,
promotes
an
effective
and
sustainable
land
use
of
infrastructure.
As
far
as
the
waivers
so
section
number
27-139-4,
the
design
of
this
proposal,
development
is
unique
and
therefore
in
need
of
waivers,
the
requester
waivers
will
not
substantially
interfere
or
injure
the
rights
of
those.
Other
properties
who
have
affected
should
be
affected
by
the
waivers.
A
B
H
A
Let's,
let's
hear
the
the
good
evening
Council
just
very
briefly:
I
I
have.
K
R
Item
number
one:
we
would
have
no
problem
with
you
indulging
Mr
Burke.
A
Mr
singer
himself
came
up
as
council.
Is
that
all
right?
If
that
we
hear
items
number
two
and
11
together
no
problem?
Thank
you
very
much
so
then
we
will
start
with
items
two
and
eleven.
N
This
is
Danny
Collins
again
with
your
planet,
commission
staff.
This
is
item
two
it's
cacpa
2209
is
for
multiple
folios
generally
located
Northeast
of
the
intersection
of
West
Varn
Avenue
and
South
MacDill
Avenue.
N
Here's
a
locational
map,
the
subject
site
is
shown
here
on
our
map.
The
site
is
within
the
South
Tampa
planning
district,
it's
within
the
Ballast
Point
neighborhood,
it's
in
the
Cosi
Hazard
area,
and
it's
also
within
the
MacDill
Air
Force
flight
path.
It's
just
a
mile
and
a
half
north
of
macville
here
is
the
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
and
a
surrounding
properties.
You'll
see
the
subject
site.
N
It's
shown
here
in
yellow
it's
generally
Northeast
of
the
intersection
of
South
MacDill
Avenue
and
West
Barn
Avenue,
the
surrounding
development
patterns,
predominantly
residential
and
single-family
detaches
to
the
north.
The
northeast
of
the
subject
site,
as
well
as
to
the
South
west
of
the
subject
site
directly
south
of
the
subject
site
in
southeast
is
a
town
home
development
and
then
to
the
northeast
of
the
northwest
of
the
subject.
Site
is
mcdell
48
elap
Park
here
is
a
photo
looking
east
of
the
subject
site
from
South
MacDill
Avenue.
N
This
is
looking
North
along
South
mcdill
Avenue.
The
subject's
site
is
out
of
front
to
the
right.
N
This
is
looking
west
across
from
the
subject
site.
This
is
kind
of
this.
Is
the
detached
single
family
neighborhood
to
the
west
of
the
subject
site.
This
is
looking
South
along
South,
MacDill,
Avenue,
subject.
Subject
side
is
outer
frame
to
the
left,
and
this
is
looking
at
the
Town
Home
Development,
that's
situated
to
the
south
of
the
subject
site
on
the
east
side
of
MacDill,
and
then
this
is
the.
This
is
another
image
looking
at
the
detached
single
family
neighborhood
to
the
west
of
the
site.
N
So
just
a
quick
background.
This
is
privately
initiated.
Amendment,
it's
small
scale
in
size,
the
total
subject
site
is
1.42
Acres.
A
majority
of
the
subject
site
is
recognized
under
the
residential
20
designation
and
then
a
small
portion
is
recognized
under
the
residential
10
designation.
This
request
would
recognize
the
entire
site
under
the
residential
10
designation.
So
it's
actually
down
planning
the
R20
portions
to
the
r-10.
N
Here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
As
mentioned,
a
majority
of
the
subject's
site
is
recognized
under
the
R20,
and
then
the
Southeastern
portion
of
the
site
is
recognized
under
the
r-10
generally,
the
r-20
is
found
along
the
mcdill
corridor.
There
is
our
10
to
the
Northeast
and
east
of
the
subject
site
and
then
South
is
this.
N
Is
that
town
home
development
with
the
portion
recognized
under
the
R20
and
then
the
Eastern
portion
of
that
development
is
recognized
under
the
r-10
as
we
move
South
along
mcdill
and
we
have
folios
recognized
under
the
cmu-35
designation.
This
green
line
is
here,
recognize
or
denote
the
coastal
Hazard
area.
The
entire
site
is
within
that
coal
sizard
area.
N
N
So,
currently
under
the
R20
and
under
the
r10,
the
subject
site
can
be
considered
for
25
dwelling
units
or
just
over
20
and
29
000
square
feet
of
non-residential
development
that
would
be
subject
to
locational
criteria.
I
do
want
to
mention
that,
since
the
subject
site
is
within
the
McDowell
Air
Force
plate
or
flight
path,
the
site
is
limited
at
10
to
1
years
per
acre,
as
proposed
under
the
r-10,
the
subjects
that
can
be
considered
for
13
drawn
units
or
just
over
21
000
square
feet
of
non-residential
development.
N
The
planet,
commission
staff
reviewed
the
request
and
found
it
consistent
with
a
number
of
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
the
request
would
maintain
the
stability
of
single-family
areas
while
expanding
opportunities
for
housing
choices,
which
was
consistent
with
the
variety
of
sections
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
Additionally,
it
was
it's.
The
request
is
consistent
with
the
density.
That's
anticipated
in
the
MacDill
Air
Force
flight
path,
as
mentioned
development
in
the
flight
path,
can
be
considered.
There's
a
limit
of
10
volumes
per
acre.
The
r10
would
be
consistent
with
the
density
anticipating
that
flight
path.
N
The
comprehensive
plan
generally
directs
populations
away
from
the
coastized
area.
This
request
would
actually
remove
potential
units
from
the
colsa
high
Hazard
area
and
then
finally,
this
request
would
allow
better
utility
utilization
of
the
site
and
allow
additional
housing
opportunities
in
the
South
Tampa
Planning
District.
N
N
Danny
Collins
again
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff,
have
been
sworn
in,
so
the
site,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
was,
is
in
the
South
Tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
it's
in
the
Ballast
Point
neighborhood
Skyview
Park
is
the
closest
recreation
facility
being
located
quarter
mile
to
the
northwest
of
the
subject
site.
The
subject
site
is
also
within
the
MacDill
Air
Force
flight
path.
The
site
is
not
within
proximity
to
Transit,
it's
within
a
level,
a
evacuation
Zone
and
it's
within
the
Cosi
Hazard
area.
N
I'll
go
over
this
briefly.
The
subject
site
is
shown
here.
It's
outlined
in
purple
surrounding
areas
for
predominantly
single
family
detached.
There
is
a
town
home
development
to
the
south
of
and
southeast
of
the
subject
site.
N
N
If
that's
approved,
this
entire
site
would
be
recognized
under
the
residential
10
designation,
the
Planning
Commission
staff
reviewed
the
existing
densities
of
the
surrounding
area,
West
Barn
Avenue,
which
is
directly
to
the
west
of
the
subject
site,
attains
mostly
a
detached,
single-family
residential
uses
and
is
developed
at
5.27
dual
units
per
acre.
The
Planning
Commission
staff
also
reviewed
the
existing
density,
excluding
the
subject
site
along
mcdill,
just
south
of
West
Avril,
Avenue
and
north
of
Napoleon
Avenue.
The
density
along
this
segment
of
South
MacDill
is
4.93.
Dual
units
per
acre.
N
N
The
comprehensive
plan
encourages
attached
single-family
uses
to
be
designed
to
include
orientation
on
the
front
door
towards
a
neighborhood,
sidewalk
or
Street.
The
entrances
to
units
one
through
five
are
oriented
towards
and
connect
to
the
sidewalk
on
South
MacDill
Avenue.
Due
to
the
existence
of
multiple
Grand
trees
on
the
site,
the
applicant
was
not
able
to
orient
all
units
to
South
MacDill
Avenue.
N
Thus
the
entrance
is
to
unit
6
through
13
are
oriented
internally
toward
a
community
Courtyard
pedestrian
connections
that
connect
to
the
sidewalk
adjacent
to
the
site
on
South
MacDill
are
provided
to
the
internal
facing
units.
Planet
commission
staff
finds
that
the
applicant
has
addressed
land
use
policy
9.2.6
to
the
best
of
their
ability,
while
preserving
several
Grand
trees
on
the
site.
N
The
request
supports
many
of
the
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plans
that
relates
to
housing,
the
City's
population
by
providing
additional
housing
opportunities
in
the
Ballast
Point
neighborhood,
the
planet,
commission
staff
requested
between
first
and
second
reading,
the
applicant
records
only
the
residential
10
future
Landings
designation
on
the
site
data
table
based
on
these
considerations,
the
planet,
commission
staff
lines
and
requests
consistent
with
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
This
concludes
my
presentation
available
for
any
questions.
Any.
A
E
E
E
Directly
to
the
north,
you
have
Zone
CN
commercial
neighborhood
and
rs60.
The
CN
zone
property
is
developed
with
a
vehicular
repair
shop
and
the
property
zone.
Rs60
is
zoned
with
residential
single-family
detached
dwelling
units
to
the
south
of
the
property
right
here.
The
property
is
zoned
PD
and
another
PD
and
rs
60..
E
E
The
other
building
is
comprised
of
three
dwelling
units
and
the
third
building
is
comprised
of
five
dwelling
units.
Each
of
these
face
an
internal
Courtyard.
The
building
setbacks
are
west
25
feet,
South,
seven
feet,
North,
seven
feet
and
East
20
feet.
The
maximum
height
the
applicant
is
proposing
is
40
feet,
a
total
of
30
parking
spaces
are
required
and
30
parking
spaces
are
being
provided.
E
Now.
The
applicant
is
requesting
two
waivers
first
waiver,
as
of
section
27-284.3.1,
to
requests
to
reduce
the
required
50.
True
attention
for
a
wooded
site
over
one
acre
in
size
to
42
percent,
trigger
attention,
that's
a
16
reduction
and
then
also
the
second
waiver
section
27-282.9
to
request
to
allow
the
front
doors
of
eight
dwelling
units
to
face
the
internal
Courtyard
rather
than
the
right-of-way
I
will
now
share
the
elevations
provided
by
the
applicant.
E
As
I
got
right
up
to
the
street
up
to
the
the
side
itself,
you
see
the
public,
no
signs.
E
Development
coordination
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
to
be
consistent
with
the
Land
Development
code.
Should
it
be
council's
pleasure
to
approve
the
project,
the
applicant
must
provide
changes
to
the
site
plan
on
the
revision
sheet
between
first
and
second
reading.
Hey
for
any
questions,
any.
N
N
K
Q
To
thank
staff
for
the
consistency
findings
happy
to
make
the
requested
changes.
We
do
have
neighbor
support
I
think
you
heard
some
of
them
on.
Q
Meeting
we
believe
we
meet
the
waiver
criteria
and
the
team
is
available
for.
K
Through
things,
if
you
want
to
see
it,
but
that's
just
if
you
want
to
see
it
and
we
would
ask
for
your
approval.
A
I
Good
evening
Dana
Gordon
3019
North
Adams
good,
to
see
you
all
Mr
Shelby,
welcome
back
I
am
the
President
of
the
Ballast
Point
neighborhood
association,
the
principal
of
the
development
company
Mr
Nicholson,
did
reach
out
to
us.
He
was
proactive
asking
our
support
for
this
development.
We
looked
at
the
site
plans.
We
did
have
concerns
about
the
two
grand
trees
on
the
property.
He
was
very
open-minded
to
redoing
the
site
plan
several
times
to
make
sure
that
we
preserve
those
trees,
which
was
of
utmost
importance.
I
The
current
buildings
that
are
there
are
dilapidated.
It
has
been
abandoned
for
at
least
10
years.
Maybe
more.
There
has
been
some
vandalism
on
the
property,
so
we
were
very
excited
to
have
that
property
updated
and
it
really
does
meet
the
design
and
character
of
Ballast
Point.
So
we
have
no
issues
with
this
development.
K
Hey
good
evening,
we
support
this
Caroline
with
you
here
as
well.
There
was
a
a
point
in
time
where
the
developer
was
told
they
were
gonna
have
to
move
some
buildings
around
which
would
take
out
a
ground,
a
Grand
City.
They
worked
with
Carol
Ann
to
get
that
taken
care
of.
We
should
put
this
developer
back
months
on
developing
this
property
and
I'm
sure
it
cost
them
a
lot
of
money
and
would
really
do
appreciate
that.
Thank
you.
F
I
S
Davis
chairman
file
number
t
a
CPA,
2209
orange
members.
Therefore,
first
reading
consideration
an
ordinance
amending
the
Imagine
24
table
comes
a
plan.
Future
land
use
elements,
future
land
use
map
for
the
property
located
at
6522,
6524
and
6526
South
MacDill
Avenue,
and
the
photo
numbers
of
one
three,
six,
three,
nine
one
dash
four
zeros
and
one
three
six,
three
nine
two
dash
four
zeros
for
resident
of
twenty
R20
original
Ten
are
ten
to
original
10
r10,
provided
for
all
repeal
the
order
system,
conflict,
providing
preserability,
providing
effectuality
and.
F
F
B
F
Where
I'd
like
to
move
file,
number
Rez,
22,
-14,
all
right,
22-14,
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration,
ordinance,
rezoning
property
in
general
vicinity
of
6522-6524
and
6526
South,
MacDill,
Avenue
and
folio
numbers
one.
Three,
six:
three,
nine
one
point:
zero:
zero,
zero,
zero
and
one
three:
six:
three:
nine
two
point:
zero:
zero,
zero,
zero
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
classification,
RS
60,
residential
single
family
to
PD
plan
development,
residential
single-family
attached
providing
effective
date
would.
F
Yes
includes
waivers
and
what.
F
In
the
revision
sheet,
the
the
proposed
development
is
consistent
with
housing
policies,
1.3.1
1.3.3
and
1.3.4,
and
land
use
policies,
policies,
1.2.3
and
2.1.2,
which
encourage
new
housing
on
vacant
underutilized
land
to
ensure
that
an
adequate
supply
of
housing
is
available
to
meet
the
needs
of
Tampa's
present
future
populations.
F
8.3.4
and
8.14.1
also
the
proposed
development,
as
shown
a
site
plan,
promotes
or
encourages
development
that
is
appropriate
in
location,
character
and
compatibility
with
surrounding
neighborhood.
The
design
of
the
proposed
development
is
unique
and
therefore
is
in
need
of
waiver.
The
requested
waiver
will
not
substantially
interfere
with
or
injure
the
rights
of
others
whose
property
would
be
greatly
affected
and
they
projected
Grand
Oaks.
F
F
H
Jennifer
alone,
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff,
I
will
start
with
item
number
one
which
is
TA
CPA
22-03.
It
is
seven
Parcels
located
west
of
North
Albany
Avenue
South
of
West
North,
A,
Street
and
East
of
Westland
Avenue,
it's
located
in
the
central
Tampa
planning
district
in
the
North
High
Park
neighborhood.
It
is
also
within
the
West
Tampa
cra
I
have
an
aerial
photo
for
you
here.
As
you
can
see,
it
is
about
seven
Parcels
between
Westland
Albany
and
north
of
Kennedy,
and
it's
east
of
South
Howard
Avenue.
H
We
have
some
town,
a
mixture
of
housing
types.
We
have
some
townhouse
development
and
the
commercial
developmental
on
Kennedy
Boulevard.
H
This
is
a
privately
initiated
small
scale.
Amendment.
It
is
about
1.04
acres
and
the
request
for
you
tonight
for
the
planned
amendment
is
from
Community
mixed
use.
35
to
Urban
mixed
u60
I
do
have
some
site
photos.
We
have
the
subject
site
another
portion
of
the
subject
site
this
one
I'm
at
the
I'm
facing
East
at
the
corner
of
West,
North,
A,
Street,
North,
Albany
and
the
subject
site
is
behind
me.
So
those
are
those
Town
Homes
located
kind
of
across
from
the
subject
site
as
one
move
to
the
north
of
Kennedy.
H
This
is
West
North,
8th,
Street
facing
west
the
subject
sites
on
the
left-hand
side
of
the
photograph,
and
so
we
see
we
have
some
some
homes,
some
single-family
detached
homes
in
the
in
the
area,
and
then
this
is
North
Westland
Avenue
facing
south
towards
Kennedy
Boulevard.
Subject:
sites
behind
me
for
the
plan
Amendment
we
say
we
have
some
commercial
uses
on
either
side
of
the
of
that
road.
H
Like
the
the
back
end
of
these
commercial
uses,
is
the
dialysis
and
then
the
Jersey
mics
I
also
just
want
to
be
really
clear
tonight.
These
the
boundary
for
the
plan
amendment
is
different
than
the
boundary
for
the
zoning
that
you'll
be
reviewing
later
and
so
is
the
acreage.
So
this
is
the
boundary
for
the
plan.
Amendment
again
it
is
just
these
seven
parcels
and
their
Community
makes
use
35..
The
urban
mix
u60
is
to
the
South.
H
We
have
more
Community
mixtures
35
to
the
north
residential
20
residential
35..
These
were
Town
Homes
I
showed
on
a
picture
a
couple
slides
ago.
Urban
makes
you
60
is
a
predominant
land
use
pattern
across
West,
Kennedy
Boulevard.
H
The
request
would
take
these
seven
Parcels
Two
Urban
mix260,
so
it
would
have
the
same
future.
Land
use
designation
as
what
is
to
be
South
and
what
is
along
West
Kennedy
Boulevard
I
also
want
to
point
out
that
this
community
makes
these
35
to
the
north
provides
that
transition
in
land
use
intensity
as
one
moves
North.
H
This
would
increase
the
impacts
from
about
36
dwell
units
to
62
dwelling
units.
It
would
also
greatly
increase
the
amount
of
non-residential
square
footage
from
about
90
000
square
feet
to
147
000
square
feet.
This
should
actually
say
non-residential
or
residential,
because
you
can
use
the
floor
area
ratio
for
either
in
both
of
these
land
use
categories.
It
would
also
introduce
again
the
the
far
would
go
up
from
a
two
to
up
to
a
3.25.
A
lot
under
the
urban
makes
you
60..
H
We
send
this
out
for
review,
as
we
do
all
of
our
plan
amendments.
In
this
case,
the
city
of
Tampa
planning
department,
did
have
an
objection.
Stephen
Benson
is
here
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have
about
that.
The
West
Nampa
community
redevelopment
area
had
no
comments,
because
this
is
in
the
West
Tampa
CRA.
We
made
sure
that
they
were
in
the
loop
on
on
on
this
one.
This
is
consistent
and
the
Planning
Commission
found
it
consistent
with
several
comprehensive
plan
objectives
and
policies.
H
We
want
to
provide
enough
housing
to
meet
Tampa's
growing
population,
so
we
found
that
the
increase
of
density
here
was
consistent
with
that,
and
this
could
be
considered
an
underutilized
land
being
in
this
area
of
the
city.
We
would
all
we
also.
The
plan
also
supports
increased
density
to
support
walking
and
Transit
usage
within
proximity
to
employment
Transit
and
to
further
that
complexity,
form
strategy.
This
is
Kennedy
Boulevard.
H
It's
a
major
employment
Corridor,
there's
Transit
along
this
Corridor,
and
so
we
we
found
that
the
Planning
Commission
found
that
it
was
consistent
with
these
policies
as
well,
and
so
that
concludes
my
presentation.
The
Planning
Commission
recommends
that
this
is
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan,
I'm
available
for
any
questions
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
City
staff.
To
present
on
that
rezoning.
K
Thank
you,
Stephen
Benson,
City,
Planning
I
just
wanted
to
provide
some
additional
context
to
our
objection.
The
the
umu
is
primarily
along
Kennedy,
and
so
it
doesn't
actually
go
beyond
the
alley
that
runs
between
Kennedy
and
North
a
it
does
not
penetrate
north
of
the
alley
in
this
area,
half
mile
to
the
east
or
three
quarters
of
a
mile
to
the
West.
K
So
this
would
be
introducing
the
new
the
umu
further
into
the
neighborhood
than
what
exist
now,
and
that
was
the
basis
of
our
objection
and
then
the
policies
that
we
were
citing
were
related
to
Urban
Design
Land
Use
policy,
4.4.6
to
recognize
the
significant
design
role
of
Ali's
in
defining
the
character
of
traditional
Tampa
neighborhoods
with
regard
to
access
and
building
orientation,
as
well
as
land
use
policy
9.6.4,
which
seeks
to
balance
the
objective
to
increase
opportunities
for
new
Housing
Development
to
ensure
that
adequate
housing
for
Tampa's
residents
is
balanced
with
the
equally
important
objective
of
ensuring
that
new
new
development
is
compatible
with
neighborhood
character.
A
E
Zany
sane
development
coordination,
we
also
have
Ross
Salmon's
on
the
line
for
the
vacating
number
seven
vac-22-16
Ross.
Would
you
like
to
present
that
case?
Yes,
sir.
L
L
This
application
was
filed
with
the
city
on
March
28,
2022
yep.
That
represents
the
entire
block
of
which
the
Alias
requested
to
be
vacated
yeah.
The
reason
for
the
application
is
development
relating
to
Rez
22-71.
The
alley
was
created
by
subdivision
flat.
The
existing
Alleyway
is
approximately
7
100
square
feet.
L
The
applicant's
properties
are
in
red,
multiple
Property
Owners
currently,
and
the
proposed
vacating
request
is
in
yellow.
L
This
is
the
alley
looking
North
from
North
A
Street,
not
too
bad
kid
recommendations
or
staff
objects
to
this
vacating
request,
based
on
responses
received
from
mobility
and
transportation,
planning,
easement
reservations
needed
for
Frontiers
storm
water,
Solid,
Waste,
Tico,
Tico,
people's
gas
and
Wastewater,
and
for
resources.
You
must
comply
with
chapter
27
in
regard
to
tree
preservation
and
site
design.
For
any
improvements
placed
adjacent
to
trees
in
any
vacated
area.
You
must
meet
all
NFPA
codes
during
any
program.
S
L
Then
here,
where
this
dumpster
is,
is
pretty
much
where
the
the
power
pole
is
here
is
the
section
going
north.
L
So
this
is
looking
East
from
Westland
and
again
I
can
show
you
the
image.
Looking
looking
south
from
the
North
A
Street
is.
This
is
a
general
area
that
the
alley
per
plant.
E
N
Danny
Collins
again
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff,
I've
been
sworn
in.
As
mentioned,
this,
the
site
is
within
the
central
Tampa
planning
district
and
more
of
a
specifically
in
the
North
Hyde
Park
neighborhood,
it's
along
West
Kennedy
Boulevard,
which
is
a
Transit
emphasis.
Corridor.
The
closest
Transit
stop
is
located
east
of
the
subject
site
on
on
Kennedy
Boulevard.
The
stop
is
serviced
by
heart,
Route
30,
connecting
the
subjects
like
to
downtown
Tampa
West,
the
West
Shore
business
district
and
Tampa
International
Airport
subject
site
is
within
a
level
C
evacuation.
N
As
Jennifer
mentioned
earlier,
the
northern
portion
of
the
site
is
what's
being
considered
for
the
plant
amendments.
The
southern
portion
is
currently
recognized
under
the
umu
60
future
land
use
met
our
future
land
use
designation.
The
subject
site
is
shown
here
outlined
in
purple.
It's
on
the
north
side
of
Kennedy
south
of
West
Northeast
Street,
there's
predominantly
non-residential
uses
along
Kennedy
As.
You
move
north
off
the
Kennedy
Corridor
you
get
into
a
single-family
detached
neighborhood
to
the
north
north
of
North
A
Street.
N
N
If
it's
approved,
this
entire
site
would
be
recognized
under
the
umu
60
future
land
use
designation,
their
CME
35
designated
Parcels
to
the
north
of
the
subject
site,
as
well
as
to
the
West
along
Kennedy,
our
Parcels
recognized
under
the
umu
60
future
land
use,
designation
and
then
directly
to
the
north,
east
and
east
of
the
subject
site.
N
Our
parcel
is
recognized
under
the
residential
35
future
Landing
says
ignation
I
do
want
to
mention
the
subject
size
just
outside
of
the
West
Tampa
Urban
Village,
which
is
I,
believe
it's
one
block
north
of
the
subject
site
the
Planning
Commission
staff
reviewed
the
application
and
found
it
consistent
with
several
policies
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
N
Applicant
is
utilizing
Florida
ratio
to
determine
the
maximum
allowable
residential
units
and
is
proposing
to
just
over
239
000
square
feet
of
residential
retail
at
an
overall
2.74
far
since
the
site
is
along
an
arterial
roadway
and
is
at
least
a
half
acre
in
size,
the
site
can
be
considered
for
2.75
without
the
need
for
a
bonus
agreement.
The
intensity
of
the
PD
is
consistent
with
the
Urban
Development
pattern
that
is
anticipated
in
this
portion
of
this
or
this
area
of
the
city.
The
applicant
addresses
the
mixed-use
quarter
policies.
N
The
PD
proposes
a
building
that
is
placed
to
the
close
to
the
adjacent
public
rights
away
with
building
entrances
on
the
face
and
connect
to
the
public
sidewalks.
The
proposed
PD
activates,
the
West
Kennedy
Boulevard,
with
retail
spaces
and
lines
North
Albany
Avenue
and
West
North
A
Street,
with
Waka
style
townhome
units,
which
provides
a
sensitive
transition
to
areas
north
and
east
of
the
subject
site
which
contain
lower
density
land
use
category
categories,
the
pde
perimos
is
a
building.
That
is
sorry.
N
The
proposed
rezoning
supports
many
of
the
comprehensive
plan
policies
relating
to
housing,
the
City's
population,
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan
encourages
new
housing
on
vacant
and
underutilized
land.
To
ensure
an
adequate
supply
of
housing
is
available
to
meet
the
needs
of
Tampa's
present
and
future
populations.
The
request
will
add
additional
housing
within
the
central
Tampa
Planning
District.
N
In
conclusion,
the
request
is
consistent
with
the
compact
City
form
strategy,
which
seeks
to
promote
housing
at
densities
that
promote
walking
and
Transit
near
employment
concentration,
as
well
as
residential
services
and
amenities.
The
planet.
Commission
staff
request
that
between
first
and
second
reading
that
the
applicant
corrects
the
future
land
use
designation
on
the
site
data
table
enlist
the
urban
mix
260
category
on
the
on
the
site
data
table
based
on
these
considerations,
the
planet,
commission
staff
finds
a
request
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
city
of
Tampa
conference
a
plan.
E
E
The
development
is
currently
there
with
residential
and
Commercial
uses,
as
I'll
show
you
in
the
pictures
to
come
the
properties
to
the
north
R
zone
rm16.
These
lots
are
developed
with
residential
single
family
and
residential
multi-family
uses.
E
E
Aerial
view
of
the
property
the
proposed
project
is
for
235
residential
multi-family
attached
units,
a
restaurant
and
commercial
retail
uses.
As
you
see,
this
is
as
I'll
show
you
pictures
to
come.
This
is
what's
currently
there.
You
have
a
Jersey,
Mike's,
Sub,
Shop
and
also
next
to
it.
You
will
have
a
personal
services
nail
salon
right
there.
E
The
maximum
height
proposed
is
85
feet
or
8
stories,
setbacks
to
the
West
10
feet,
North
10,
feet,
East,
10
feet
and
South
5
feet.
The
applicant
is
required
to
have
452
parking
spaces
and
he
is
providing
348
parking
spaces.
This
will
need
a
waiver
vehicle
or
access
comes
off
of
North
Westland
Avenue
as
you'll
see
here.
Access
and
access.
E
From
the
south
elevation
from
the
south,
you
have
West
Kennedy
flow.
E
E
E
Development
coordination
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
to
be
inconsistent
with
the
Land
Development
code.
Now
the
applicant
is
requesting
five
waivers
and
it
may
go
over
these
waivers
really
quickly.
First,
one
is
to
reduce
the
number
of
loading
births
from
four
to
zero.
Second
is
to
reduce
the
required
parking
from
452
spaces
to
348,
which
is
a
23
reduction.
E
Third,
one
is
to
request
to
allow
access
to
a
local
Street
greater
than
100
feet
of
the
intersection
from
Candy
Boulevard
and
then
the
fourth
is
to
request
to
remove
one
non-hazardous,
Grand,
Live
Oak,
and
the
fifth
is
to
request
to
reduce
the
required
40
percent,
true
retention
to
zero
percent
for
a
non-wooded
site
over
one
acre
now,
development
coordination
has
reviewed
the
overall
request
and
finds
the
overall
request
to
be
inconsistent
with
the
Land
Development
code.
E
Should
it
be
council's
desire
to
choose
to
approve
the
application,
the
applicant
must
provide
modifications
to
the
site
plan
and
the
revision
sheet
as
per
the
revision
sheet
between
first
and
second
reading.
Thank
you.
R
R
Council
David
singer,
101,
East,
Kennedy,
Suite,
2800
and
I've
been
sworn
with
me
tonight
is
my
colleague
Matt
Newton,
also
from
Shoemaker
the
representatives
of
the
applicants,
Mitch
Corte
and
Ashley
bisner
here
my
colleague
Colin
rice
and
Liz
Keller,
who
this
is
her
first
hearing
where
she
had
passed
the
bar
this
week.
So
we'd
like
to
welcome
Liz.
R
We're
doing
three
at
once
tonight
and
I
know
that
everybody's
had
a
long
day
and
I
certainly
do
not
want
to
belabor
these
points
that
I'm
going
to
make,
even
though
I
do
believe
they
are
important.
So
I
would
ask
your
Indulgence
for
a
little
bit
of
extra
time.
Mr
chairman
I
do
not
believe
I'm
going
to
go
for
45
minutes
with
15
minutes
each
but
I
I
may
go
20
minutes,
we'll
see
I
hope
not
I'll
try
and
go
quickly
again.
R
G
R
Are
a
growing
city
we
have
some
Growing
Pains
and
not
everybody
is
going
to
be
happy
with
increased
development,
with
change
with
something
different.
R
What
I
would
ask
of
you,
as
I
always
ask
of
you,
is
to
evaluate
this
project
and
this
application
on
its
merits
and
evaluated
by
the
standards
which
the
code
asks
you
to
evaluate
it
with
that
I'm
pleased
to
be
here
on
behalf
of
local
Acquisitions,
who
is
committed
to
bringing
this
exciting
vertically
integrated
mixed
use,
project
on
the
Kennedy
Transit
emphasis
Corridor
just
blocks
from
our
Urban
core.
R
Your
approval
tonight
is
going
to
Mark
the
culmination
of
months
of
project
design
and
redesign
and
very
significant
community
outreach
about
how
we
can
bring
Innovative
mixed
use
development
anchored
by
a
multi-family
housing
component
at
a
time
when
we
need
it
most.
As
staff
mentioned,
we
are
requesting
three
approvals
from
you
tonight:
the
future
land
use
change
only
on
the
Block's
northern
half
the
site
is
already
umu
60
in
the
southern
portion
and
it's
CMU
35
on
the
Northern
portion.
We're
only
talking
about
that
Northern
portion.
R
This
request
was
made
through
an
application,
Planning
Commission,
as,
as
you
heard,
received
a
recommendation
of
approval
second
to
effectively
utilize
this
parcel.
We
need
to
vacate
the
internal
alleys
and
we'll
talk
about
that
briefly
and
third,
and
finally,
we're
asking
you
to
rezone
to
a
PD
to
accommodate
the
mixed-use
nature
of
the
project.
The
site
that
we
are
discussing
is
squarely
in
the
Heart
of
the
City
on
Kennedy.
R
Here
in
yellow
it
fronts
the
Kennedy
Boulevard
commercial
and
Transit
emphasis
Corridor,
it's
within
the
central
Tampa
planning
district,
it's
less
than
a
block
from
Howard
Avenue
for
orientation.
You
can
see
here's
the
JCC
in
the
downtown
core
and
importantly,
the
tgh
expansion
on
Kennedy,
which
has
the
same
future
land
use
we're
requesting
in
their
future
land
use
depth,
is
actually
look
greater
as
you
go
north
from
Kennedy
as
the
way
we're
requesting
the
site
outlined
in
yellow
is
currently
developed
with
a
mix
of
low
density,
retail,
restaurant,
multi-family
and
single
family.
R
Considering
the
location
of
this
parcel,
this
site
is
underutilized
and
can
be
far
more
effectively
used,
for
example,
where
these
single-family
homes
are
is
CMU
35.
That
permits
a
far
more
intense
use
than
what
is
sitting
there
now,
including
retail
and
office,
and
Commercial
General
when
possible,
land
use
policy.
2.1.2
calls
for
these
sites
to
be
redeveloped
accordingly,
quote:
use
limited
Land
Resources
more
effectively
and
pursue
a
development
pattern
that
is
more
economically
Sound
by
encouraging
infill
development
on
vacant
and
underutilized
parcels.
R
So
the
first
step
to
maximizing
this
site's
potential
is
by
assigning
the
block
a
more
efficient
future
land
use
designation
and,
as
you
see
here,
the
block
currently
has
two
designations,
already
CME
35
to
the
north
and
umu
60
to
the
South.
As
we
pointed
out
to
the
Planning
Commission
in
May,
precedent
for
expanding
the
umu
60
designation,
already
exists.
Present
includes
Parcels
at
Kennedy
and
mcdill
at
Kennedy
and
Armenia
as
well
as
Kennedy
and
Oregon.
R
We
also
discussed
with
Planning
Commission
that
expanding
the
umu
60
line
Advance
a
number
of
comprehensive
plan
policies
to
which
they
concurred.
There
are
over
21
land
use
policies
which
suggests
that
this
should
be
embraced
and
and
approved.
I
will
not
read
all
of
them,
but
I
would
request
that
you
follow
the
planning
commission's
recommendation
and
approve
their
request.
R
That
concludes
the
future.
Land
use
comprehensive
plan
piece
of
the
presentation,
and
so
let's
move
to
the
vacation
piece
of
it
in
the
next
step
in
maximizing
the
potential
of
this
site
is
to
vacate
these
internal
alleys
on
the
left.
You
can
see
the
area
that
is
hashed
in
red
next
to
an
area
of
the
site.
The
north-south
portion
is
currently
overgrown
and
not
passable.
R
Here
you
can
see
the
alley
in
red
overlaid
on
the
proposed
development
plan
and,
as
you
see,
there's
with
this
development
plan,
there's
just
no
way
you
can
keep
these
allies
in
place.
The
the
development
will
account
for
all
the
services
currently
depending
on
that
right-of-way,
including
the
waste,
the
loading
and
the
utilities
and
we're
already
in
discussions
about
moving
to
easements
as
necessary,
additionally,
to
facilitate
the
non-vehicular
transportation,
we're
proposing
enhanced
seven
to
ten
foot
sidewalks
along
the
west,
the
North
and
the
east
frontages.
R
R
R
So
I
want
you
to
notice
on
this,
the
nondescript
walls
on
each
side,
there's
no
elevation
step
down
on
North
a
there
are
no
walk-up
units
at
the
time.
This
was
a
good
project
with
OK
design,
but
after
incorporating
neighborhood
suggestions,
this
has
the
potential
to
be
a
great
project.
R
The
applicant
team
has
thoroughly
engaged
the
community
in
order
to
hear
the
ideas.
Many
of
the
community
ideas
were
incorporated
into
the
plan
that
is
before
you
this
evening.
I
have
been
doing
this
for
quite
some
time
and
let
me
tell
you:
I,
have
not
seen
this
amount
of
community
engagement
on
a
multi-family
mixed-use
development.
In
my
time,
in
the
city
of
Tampa,
almost
2
000
people
were
contacted.
260
doors
were
individually
knocked
on.
There
was
a
robust
email
communication
plan
and
a
lot
of
mail
was
sent
as
well.
R
This
applicant
met
with
the
North
Hyde
Park
civic
association,
the
North
Hyde
Park
business
Alliance,
the
West
Tampa
chamber,
the
West
Tampa
CRA
39,
individual
businesses.
They
held
a
North
Park
Hyde
Park
neighborhood
meeting
on
August,
the
17th
without
request
from
anybody
on
their
own,
and
they
have
been.
This
project
has
been
endorsed
by
the
North
Hyde
Park
civic
association
and
the
North
Hyde
Park
business
Alliance.
R
In
addition,
I
have
over
40
signatures
on
letters
of
support
which
I
will
put
into
the
record
and
we
are
proud
to
have
received
them.
However,
ever
we
understand
again
that
with
a
growing
city,
come
Growing
Pains,
not
everybody
is
going
to
love
a
project,
and
there
are
some
current
tenants
at
the
existing
business
on
this
block.
They
have
expressed
hesitation,
I
believe
you're,
going
to
hear
from
them
tonight.
One
is
the
theater
Jersey
Mike's
has
some
issues
with
access
and
parking
which
I
am
happy
to
address
on
rebuttal.
R
You've
received
a
letter,
our
friend
Miss
Mandel,
who
I
believe
is
with
us
remotely,
is
going
to
talk
to
you
briefly
about
them.
I
absolutely
will
have
some
comments
about
it
and
I
hope.
After
you
hear
their
comments
and
our
comments,
you
will
feel
at
ease
that
this
is
the
right
project
at
the
right
time
in
the
right
place
with
that
set.
R
Additionally,
working
with
Urban
Design,
the
applicant
committed
to
providing
sidewalks
up
to
10
foot
wide
to
better
facilitate
pedestrian
circulation
around
the
site.
So
here
is
the
rezoning
PD
site
plan.
In
a
little
bit
more
detail,
you
can
see
the
wrap
of
the
walk
up
again
to
the
north
and
to
the
east.
R
R
R
A
little
bit
more
on
the
restaurant
space
that
we
intend
to
keep
with
this
PD
as
I'm
sure
you've
noticed
the
Jersey
Mike's
is
part
of
it
remaining
in
its
current
form.
We're
gonna
have
to
carefully
construct
around
it
to
mitigate
any
inconvenience
to
its
ongoing
operations.
Now
this
includes
giving
them
parking
in
the
parking
garage,
loading
and
unloading
areas
behind
and
grease
trap
maintenance,
and
you
can
see
all
that
on
the
site
plan
in
Miss
Mandel's
letter
there
was
some
concern
about:
will
there
be
parking?
Will
there
be
access
for
loading
and
unloading?
R
R
The
blue
areas
marked
building
below,
are
stepped
down
and
the
pool
Courtyard
amenity
space
is
actually
on
the
fourth
level
of
the
structure
and
the
result
is
maximizing
the
height
towards
Kennedy,
where
it
belongs.
With
the
northern
elevation
featuring
significant
step,
downs
and
walk-up
units,
you
want
to
be
careful
integrating,
obviously
into
that
neighborhood
that
is
just
to
the
north,
and
that
was
one
of
the
things
the
community
was
very
actively
concerned
about
was
I.
Don't
want
to
look
at
some
eight-story
blank
brick
wall.
R
R
So
you've
seen
these
These
are
the
elevations
that
provide
an
idea
of
what
this
looks
like.
The
top
elevation
is
from
North
Kennedy
facing
north.
So
if
you're
at
Buddy
Brew
across
the
street
and
you're
looking
across
the
street
on
Top
This
is
what
you're
looking
at
the
bottom
elevation
is
from
North
Albany
facing
west,
and
you
can
see
that
step
down
in
height
along
the
north.
R
R
There
you
can
see
the
loading
and
solid
waste
access
which
is
in
the
middle,
and
you
can
see
that
existing
retail
building
that
existing
Jersey
Mike's
is
there
and
the
bottom
is
the
west
west
north
a
elevation
facing
south
and
again
I
want
you
to
notice
the
cutout.
It's
a
little
hard
to
see
the
color
differential
on
this
bottom,
but
on
the
two
sides
are
a
little
bit
darker
brown
and
in
the
middle,
is
a
little
bit
lighter
brown,
that
is
the
cutout.
So
it's
almost
like
a
chair
with
two
big
sides
and
one
bottle.
R
As
we
mentioned
before,
the
comp
plan
identifies
Kennedy
as
a
Transit
emphasis,
Corridor,
and
the
site
is
ideally
situated
for
Transit.
This
is
precisely
where
we
want
the
high
density
mixed-use
product.
The
site
is
a
quarter
mile
from
the
central
business
district
periphery
boundary.
The
purple
area
on
this
slide
represents
a
five
minute
walk
and
the
pink
represents
a
10-minute
walk
from
the
site.
As
you
can
see,
this
location
is
a
short
walk
from
numerous
Transit
stops:
daycares
grocery
stores,
restaurants,
retail
and
convenience
shopping
and
bus.
R
R
As
you
can
see,
a
whole
lot
of
our
city
can
be
accessed
within
10
minutes
from
this
project
on
bike,
many
residents
who
are
working
downtown
or
the
new
tgh
expansion
really
wonder
these
days
if
owning
a
car
is
worth
the
cost
and
worth
the
hassle,
and
this
is
not
rhetoric
and
for
those
of
you
who
have
heard
me
present
before
on
other
housing
projects.
R
I
have
mentioned
that
car
ownership
has
been
markedly
declining
with
the
younger
Generations,
who
feel
that
the
benefits
of
car
ownership
are
simply
outweighed
by
its
costs,
and
I
will
remind
Council
that
the
FED
increased
the
interest
rate
by
another
three
quarters
of
a
point
yesterday,
making
the
cost
of
borrowing
for
a
home
or
a
car
more
expensive.
This
is
the
ideal
space
for
this
demographic.
R
I
also
want
to
point
out
that
this
applicant
has
a
track
record
of
high
quality
projects
across
the
country,
music
City
in
Nashville
to
the
city
of
my
alma
mater
Ann
Arbor.
This
group
has
done
this
before
and,
as
you
see
they
do
it
the
right
way
they
listen
to
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
and
they
come
up
with
a
collaborative
solution
to
design
and
functional
concerns,
and
we
need
these
collaborative
Solutions
to
address
not
only
design
and
functional
issues,
but
also
our
problem
of
housing
in
our
city.
R
The
housing
crisis
is
an
opportunity
for
the
private
sector
and
the
public
sector
to
work
together
to
address
it.
The
private
sector,
working
with
the
community,
invest
the
capital
to
maximize
the
underutilized
land
in
key
parts
of
the
city
like
here
in
the
Kennedy
Transit
corridor,
and
the
public
sector
provides
the
flexibility
to
make
that
maximum
potential
attainable.
R
And
so
we
have
five
waiver
requests
and
we
can
absolutely
go
through
the
rationale
behind
all
of
them.
But
I
will
I
will
just
simply
say
and
read
them
quickly
into
the
record.
We'd
like
to
reduce
the
required
number
of
loading
bursts
from
four
to
zero.
We
are
actually
providing
two
loading
bursts,
but
they
are
combined
with
a
solid
waste
access,
so
they
don't
technically
count
under
the
code,
but
there
are
loading
bursts
there,
but
we
have
to
put
the
waiver
on
to
say
four
to
zero,
reduce
the
required
parking.
23
percent.
R
Very
interestingly
I've,
come
before
this
Council
many
times
in
requested
parking
waivers
and
have
been
met
with
a
lot
of
resistance
from
the
community.
We
found
the
opposite
in
this
case,
which
surprised
me
as
we
engage
with
residents,
people
say:
can't
you
cut
more
parking,
can't
you
put
more
retail,
can't
you
put
more
services.
Can
you
put
another
restaurant
there?
Can
you
get
the
30
or
35
percent
parking
waiver,
but
we
are
limiting
here
to
23
waiver.
R
The
third
is
the
local
Street
access
greater
than
100
feet.
It
was
important
to
the
residents
to
have
that
uninterrupted
space
on
Albany,
and
so
we
moved
the
access
to
Westland
because
we're
keeping
that
Jersey
Mike's
the
axis
had
to
be
a
hundred
feet
more
than
100
feet
back
from
Kennedy,
and
so
that's
the
Genesis
of
that
waiver.
R
There
is
one
grand
Oak
that
is
in
the
back
corner
and
we
tried
to
redesign
around
it
and
the
building
would
have
been
a
lot
taller
and
it
would
not
have
been
a
good
look
so
we're
requesting
to
mitigate
for
that.
And
lastly,
again,
this
is
an
infill
site.
R
There
are
some
trees
that
are
in
the
middle
of
the
site
that
we
can't
develop
around
and
so
we're
requesting
the
final
waiver
for
the
non-wooded
site
over
one
acre
between
first
and
second
reading,
we're
requesting
some
additional
language
that
we
negotiated
with
Urban
Design.
This
is
a
high
construction
area.
There's
a
lot
of
changes
that
are
happening
in
this
area.
R
Specifically,
there
is
a
Kennedy
Boulevard,
update
and
beautification
project,
that's
going
to
be
happening
and
what
we
don't
want
to
do
is
put
in
sidewalks
put
in
trees
and
then
have
the
Kennedy
Boulevard
construction
come
in
and
make
them
incompatible
and
cause
health
problems
for
them,
and
so
we've
worked
with
Urban
Design
for
the
language
in
front
of
you
to
put
in
the
species
and
the
location
of
trees
that
their
agency
agrees
with.
R
I
will
conclude
the
first
part
of
my
presentation
before
rebuttal
with
a
reminder
about
land
use
policy
2.1.2,
which
is
the
use
of
limited
Land
Resources
more
efficiently
to
pursue
a
development
pattern
that
is
more
economically
Sound
by
encouraging
infill
development
on
vacant
and
underutilized
sites,
and
the
applicant
here
has
done
just
that.
30
seconds
they've
worked
closely
with
the
community
to
develop
this
plan
and
we
request
that
you
approve
this
application
and
I'm
sure
again,
you
are
going
to
hear
from
the
community,
but
again
I
will
remind
you.
R
F
R
F
And,
and
from
the
emails
that
I
mentioned
earlier
and
I
think
you
referenced
it,
it
appears
that
there's
some
some
Arts
facility
there
and
I
apologize
to
everybody.
I
haven't
been
there
myself,
but
is
that?
Is
there
any
special
designation
or
protection
for
either
Arts
use
or
or
a
historic
building?
Or
that's
a
good
question?
So
you
said
it
was
a
theater.
Is
there
anything?
That's
that's
protected.
R
F
R
No,
it's
a
good
question
and
there's
not
and
I
will
also
I,
don't
want
to
get
too
far
into
private
agreements,
because
I
think
that's
a
little
bit
of
a
dangerous
topic
when
we're
talking
about
rezoning.
But
there
is
a
lease
agreement
with
the
current
owner
that
each
of
the
businesses
that
are
currently
there
have
as
the
applicant,
we
don't
own
the
property.
R
F
C
I
I
would
think
that
that
wouldn't
be
wise
to
have
put
into
the
record.
It's
really
not
relevant
to
your
decision,
ultimately,
based
on
the
the
criteria.
R
So
I
I'll
agree
with
Mr
Shelby
that,
while
it's
not
relevant
to
your
criteria,
I
think
it's
fair
for
you
to
know.
I
have
represented
developers
and
applicants
who
will
come
in
and
simply
say,
there's
a
lease
the
terms
of
the
lease
Prevail
and
whatever
happens
happens.
This
is
not
one
of
those
applicants
and
I
certainly
cannot
make
any
guarantees
other
than
this
applicant
is
absolutely
open
to
negotiating.
What
that
retail
space
is
going
to
look
like
and
who
the
tenants
are
on
the
ground
floor.
R
F
The
construction
could
you
just
for
for
the
sake
of
folks
watching,
could
you
tell
us
and
Ms
Wells
could
weigh
in
or
just
not,
could
you
tell
us
what
what
rights
or
lack
of
Rights
city
council
has
to
Define
who
your
tenants
will
be.
R
I
I
will
let
City
staff
give
you
the
bulk
of
the
answer
to
that,
but
I
would
say:
city
council
does
not
have
the
right
to
getting
between
private
agreements
between
landlords
and
tenants
as
much
as
we
would
all
like
to
keep
certain
businesses
or
not
keep
certain
businesses.
When
a
rezoning
happens,
it's
not
part
of
the
criteria
that
you
can
concern.
F
Could
you
could
you
maybe
explain
for
the
for,
for
everyone,
also
what
what
it?
What
are
you
entitled
to
do
by
right
now,
I
mean?
First
of
all,
you
could
change
the
tenants
if
you
wanted,
but
what
what
are
you
entitled
you
you,
you
are
entitled
to
make
changes
to
the
buildings
or
put
new
buildings
in
right.
Could
you
just
maybe
sorry,
if
you're
not
prepared
to
answer.
R
So
the
applicant
isn't
entitled
to
do
anything
until
they
own
the
property,
but
once
they
own
the
property,
there
are
a
few
things
they
can
do
and,
and
one
is
anything
that
is
allowed
under
the
CG
designation,
the
current
designation
and
the
ung60,
which
already
exists
on
Kennedy,
which
is
high
density,
commercial,
General
zoning.
The
applicant
could
wait
until
the
end
of
the
leases
because
they
take
properties
subject
to
the
leases
and
not
renew
and
change,
and
build
and
redevelop
as
long
as
it
fits
within
the
zoning
criteria.
R
S
S
You
made
a
couple
of
points
in
your
presentation.
You
showed
about
rental
crisis,
you
you
talked
about
attainability
and
you
said
mixed
use.
So
for
me
those
are
buzzwords
for
me
and
we
got
retail.
We
have
housing.
So
fairness
when
you
use
those
words,
are
we
saying
this
is
going
to
be
available
to
all
levels?
Income?
This
is
this
whole
property
here,
which
is
a
certain
market
right
here.
So.
R
There
was
a
discussion
about
whether
or
not
this
should
be
affordable:
housing,
not
affordable,
housing,
some,
affordable
housing.
The
applicant
decided
not
to
engage
in
that
discussion
on
the
housing
component
on
the
retail.
This
is
actually
a
very
interesting
part
and
it
was
along
with
discussions
from
the
community
about
micro,
tenancies.
That's
a
big
part
of
what
we
heard
about
from
the
community
is
we
want
local
businesses,
we
want
smaller
Footprints
so
that
the
rents
are
attainable
for
emerging
businesses.
This
applicant
is
open
to
that
now.
R
You
know
we
can't
sit
here
and
commit
to
we're
going
to
have
this
tenant.
We're
going
to
have
that
tenant,
but
I
will
tell
you
from
what
we
heard
from
the
community.
That
is
of
significant
interest,
and
this
applicant
wants
to
be
here
for
a
while
wants
to
engage
with
the
community.
I
think
they've
proven
that,
and
so
we
would
ask
for
your
trust
in
the
communities,
trust
that
they're
going
to
open
themselves
to
negotiations
with
all
levels
of
businesses
from
existing
to
you
to
emerging.
S
Well,
I
I
appreciate
you
being
able
to
comment
on
that,
but
you
know,
and
and
businesses
are
key
because
that's
a
major
quarter
for
businesses
but
I'm
a
housing
guy
as
well.
So
that's
why
I
have
to
ask
that
question.
Yes,.
D
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr
singer.
You
mentioned
that
you
have
two
loading
birth
with
essence
or
the
same
loaning
birth
for
solid
waste
am
I
correct,
yes,
sir!
D
R
It
so
there
has
to
be
scheduling,
and
this
is
what
the
developer
and
the
applicant
have
done
in
city
after
city
is
coordinate
with
solid
waste
and
coordinate
with
people
who
are
looking
to
use
the
loading
birth.
D
R
I
think
we
do
make
some
assumptions
but
I
think
if
you
were
to
talk
to
Millennials
and
talk
to
some
of
the
younger
generations
and
people
who
want
to
live
closer
to
the
urban
core
and
have
those
amenities
in
walking
distance.
You
would
find
that
people
are
giving
up
their
cars
now.
That's
an
inexact
science
and.
D
R
D
D
J
M
R
Yes,
sir,
and
we've
seen
many
projects
over
the
course,
the
last
several
weeks
that
have
asked
for
parking
waivers
and
received
them
larger
than
this,
and
we
would
ask
again
you
to
consider
that
this
is
on
the
Kennedy
Transit
Corridor.
So
many
services
are
available
within
walking
and
biking
distance
that,
if
there's
going
to
be
a
parking
waiver,
this
is
a
prime
location
for.
R
R
D
I
Okay,
so
you
own
the
whole
block
or
will
yes
and
that's
a
part
that
I
still
don't
understand
that
doesn't
make
sense
to
me
if
you're
going
to
do
it,
do
it
all
but
I
understand
Lisa's
I
also
know
they
can
be
bought
out,
but
I
guess
not
so
much
I
guess
it
depends
on
the
cost.
So
I
also
had
a
concern
about
the
loading
births
and
I
I
mean
I.
I
appreciate
your
explanation.
I
That
makes
me
feel
somewhat
better,
but
I
do
think
those
initial
days
are
going
to
be
pretty
tough
and
then
my
my
other
big
concern
is
that
the
tree
retention
I
know
that
technically
going
from
40
to
zero
means
makes
it
sound
like
no
trees.
So
if
you
could
explain
your
tree
plan,
I
would
appreciate
that.
R
Sure
we
are
going
to
number
one
for
the
Grand
Tree
mitigate
into
the
fund
number
two
there's
going
to
be
tree,
plantings
all
around
the
site
to
provide
shade
for
the
pedestrians
and
any
other
trees
that
are
removed,
including
from
that
waiver
we're
going
to
pay
into
the
fund
there.
There
just
is
not
the
ability
on
a
dense
building
like
this
to
have
trees
in
the
middle
of
development.
So
they,
the
tree
plant,
is
outside
around
the
sidewalks.
I
Okay
and
then
I
heard
the
word
shade
tree,
which
means
those
palm
trees
you
have
up
there
in
the
visual
will
not
be
what's
there,
but
there
will
be
shade
trees.
A
A
However,
even
if,
on
one
day
you
had
two
percent,
that's
six
moving
vans,
then
of
course
you've
got
UPS.
You
got
Amazon
you've
got
food
delivery
trucks.
You've
got.
Do
you
see
my
point?
I
do
sir?
There
would
be
all
these
trucks
not
parking
on
Kennedy
I
guarantee
you
that
sure
they
would
be
on
the
residential
streets.
A
The
functionality
of
your
building
looks
great
but
working
with
the
neighborhood,
and
this
isn't
going
to
happen
at
odd
hours,
10
o'clock
or
three
o'clock.
When
there's
really
no
traffic,
it's
going
to
happen
in
the
morning
noon
and
in
the
evening,
so
between
first
and
second
reading
is
there
any
way
you
can
get
one
loading
birth
in
there
for
moving
vans
or
something
where
deliveries
can
be
made
without
interfering,
their
neighbors
that
are
surrounding.
R
A
R
R
K
Yeah
do
I
need
to
say
my
address:
okay,
Mitch
Cordy,
3000,
locusts,
St,
Louis
Missouri,
yes,
yes,
I
have
yeah,
okay,
so
just
to
give
to
back
up
a
little
bit.
I
know
you
didn't
want
to
talk
specifically
about
Solid
Waste,
but
I'll
give
a
little
bit
more
insight
there.
So
we
have
a
couple
different
sections
here.
K
This
is
actually
a
trash
room,
so
the
trash
will
be
handled
here.
All
of
the
floors
will
have
trash
shoots,
so
the
trash
will
come
down
into
this
room.
That
has
a
couple
compactors.
Then
this
is
actually
a
trash
staging
area,
so
we'll
bring
our
bins
here
and
that
way
they
won't
block
the
loading
area
and
then,
when
trash
pickup
is
coordinated,
these
bins
will
just
be
pulled
out
and
picked
up
right.
There.
K
Of
things
yep,
so
one
thing
with
moving
in
and
out,
this
is
a
it's
a
12
month,
Lisa
period,
so
obviously
it'll
be
staggered,
but
you
you
mentioned
six
people
moving
in
in
one
day.
That
technically
could
happen
and
that
could
come
up,
but
we
have
the
loading
bursts
and
then
we
also
have
three
three
levels
of
parking
and
there's
three
separate
elevators
that
are
connected
to
the
garage.
So
people
could
come
in.
K
They
could
go
up
to
floors,
one
two
three
closer
to
their
unit
and
then
bring
in
park
close
to
an
elevator
and
then
unload
from
there.
Okay.
A
I
don't
mean
to
give
evidence,
but
you
know
there's
certain
Heights
restrictions
to
to
garages
and
you
can't
get
a
moving
van
in
a
garage.
So
you
have
to
unload
and
load
on
the
street
and.
C
C
A
E
Is
saying
development
coordination
going
back
to
your
great
point
about
the
loading
bursts
and
if
it's
added
between
person
second
reading,
that
would
take
multiple
departments
to
look
at
over
again,
so
you
would
have
more
than
two
departments.
Looking
at
that
one
subject,
ad
Edition.
A
A
I
G
G
Public
comment
on
so
the
first
one
and
I
know
that
we're
a
little
focused
on
the
rezoning
now,
but
the
comp
plan
Amendment
before
you
is
you
know
again
the
top
plan
amendments
are
major
policy
decisions.
So,
although
we're
focused
on
the
minutia
of
the
rezoning
for
this
particular
applicant
in
this
particular
proposal,
Council
needs
to
keep
in
mind
that
if
you
approve
right,
your.
A
Please
thank
you
for
indulging
me
and
my
concerns.
Public
comment
go
ahead,
sir,
and
please
state
if
you
have
been
sworn
in
because
we
saw
some
other
people
come
in.
Yes,
sir.
Q
My
name
is
Jose
Gomez
I
have
been
sworn
at:
2101
West,
Kennedy,
Boulevard,
I'm,
the
proprietor
for
House
of
Shadows
gallery
and
first
would
like
to
apologize
for
all
the
last
minute
emails
that
you
received.
We
ourselves
just
learned
about
this
hearing
24
hours
ago.
Q
Q
We
moved
in
about
a
year
and
a
half
ago
we
opened
our
Gallery,
just
as
the
vaccines
were
released,
we
have
run
art
shows
and
a
lot
for
the
last
seven
eight
years,
all
over
Tampa
Bay,
and
we
wanted
to
create
a
space
for
artists
to
have
in
the
wake
of
what
was
a
very
slow
upturn
for
spaces.
Since
then,
we've
featured
over
300
artists
over
1500
works.
The
space
is
far
from
under
utilized.
We,
we
pack
the
space
with
300
to
a
thousand
visitors
just
on
an
opening
night
in
our
space,
the
parking.
Q
The
reason
why
the
neighborhood
wants
more
parking
is
because
the
current
Park
isn't
parking
is
inadequate.
They've
been
there
for
years
and
on
go
to
our
space
at
12
o'clock,
and
you
won't
find
a
parking
space
on
this
street
or
in
any
of
the
Lots,
because
we're
using
it
our
clients
utilize
it.
Our
events
utilize
the
space
and
we're
certainly
utilizing
that
space
and
we
continue
to
grow
we're
far
from
being
underutilized.
Q
The
the
further
pain
point
for
us
is
that,
in
case,
anyone
doesn't
know
in
the
room
our
lease
ends
on
January
24th,
I'm,
sorry
January
of
2024,
with
an
option
to
extend
for
another
three
years
at
the
current
rate,
we're
one
of
those
long-term
leasers.
The
problem
is:
is
that
there's
a
clause
in
our
lease
that
was
specifically
placed
there
for
a
deal
like
this?
Q
That
states
that,
when
a
permit
is
sought
for
demolishing
of
the
unit,
we
have
120
days
to
vacate,
regardless
of
the
options,
regardless
of
the
lease
itself,
so
we're
four
months
at
any,
given
time
from
losing
a
space
that
we
have
put
up
over
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
into
with
four
months
notice.
For
us
to
find
another
space,
the
space
has
become
the
best
art
gallery
in
all
of
Tampa.
Q
As
a
matter
of
fact,
there's
no
Art
Gallery,
like
ours,
anywhere
in
Tampa,
we're
meeting
the
criteria
of
helping
to
build
this
City's
art
infrastructure,
support
for
artists
and
support
for
the
things
that
they
do.
We
weren't
notified
of
today,
nobody
knocked
on
our
door
in
spite
of
the
community
outreach
that
supposedly
was
done.
No
one
called
us.
We
received
no
letters,
the
notice,
the
notice
for
this
hearing.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
the
sign
was
placed
on
the
back
alley
that
you
saw
there
in
the
pictures
they
wasn't
placed
on
the
building
itself.
Q
D
Q
Issue
so
we
understand
the
need
for
business
and
profit
and
housing
needs
all
of
that,
but
what
we
actually
really
need
is
a
written,
clear
and
binding
plan
of
intentions,
a
reasonable,
accurate
time,
reasonable,
accurate
timelines
cooperation
and
assistance
in
transition.
If
that's
the
intention
and
we're
requesting,
also
that
the
city
recommend
resources
for
the
preservation
of
our
Gallery,
as
well
as
power
stories
as
well,
two
very
powerful
art
resources
in
this
city.
Thank
you.
C
The
first
question
that
you're
going
to
have
to
vote
on
would
be
the
comprehensive
land
use,
and
that
is
whether
it's
appropriate
that
the
density
that
has
been
placed
in
your
current
comprehensive
plan
is
acceptable
to
be
increased
and
is
the
criteria
that
supports
that
a
basis
for
doing
that.
The
second
one
is
the
vacation,
and
if
you
need
to
have
that
criteria,
Ron
wigginton
is
here
to
do
that
and
explain
that
to
you
and
the
third
one
is
the
rezoning,
and
that
is
the
compatibility
with
what's
existing
and
the
other
criteria.
C
That's
in
your
staff
report.
Each
of
your
staff
reports
are
different
because
each
of
them
have
different
criteria
with
regard
to
relationships
between
present
landlords
and
present
tenants.
That
is
outside
the
scope
of
what
you,
as
a
land
use
board,
are
permitted
to
do
and
I
would
advise
against
making
that
a
basis
for
criteria.
If
you
were
to
deny
something
on
the
basis
of
a
private
agreement
between
a
landlord
and
a
tenant,
that
would
be
a
a
basis
for
certainly
a
review
by
a
court.
C
So
my
advice
to
you
Council
and
if
the
legal
wants
to
add
anything
to
what
I've
said,
I'd
appreciate
that,
but
seriously
the
concerns
of
the
of
the
speakers
who
discussed
this
certainly
are
heartfelt
and
certainly
are
significant
to
them.
But
in
terms
of
what
legally
you
are
responsible
for
and
required
to
do,
it
is
outside
of
your
purview.
D
Miranda,
thank
you
chairman
I
I
was
going
to
mention
that,
in
my
opinion,
I'm,
not
a
lawyer,
but
the
city
of
Tampa
is
not
privy
or
any
part
of
the
concentration
of
the
contract
between
the
landlord
and
the
and
the
property
that
would
lease
to
the
to
the
tenant.
So,
therefore,
we're
not
part
of
that
operation,
and
we
should
not
get
involved
in
that,
and
that
was
up
to
the
negotiation
of
the
two
parties
that
came
together
for
some
reason
and
Lease
the
operation
under
those
conditions
that
City
of
Tampa
was
not
involved.
C
C
D
S
S
G
If
I
may
respond
to
that
question,
councilman
Goods
chapter
27
requires
notice
to
go
to
Property
Owners
within
250
feet
of
the
site.
It's
not
required
to
go
to
tenants.
One
of
the
challenges
with
with
that
concept
is
there's
no
objective
way
for
the
city
to
determine
who
the
tenants
are
at
any
point
in
time,
tenants
change,
whereas
with
the
property
owners,
we
ask
the
applicant
to
get
that
information
from
the
Hillsborough
County
Property
Appraiser's
website,
so
the
tenants
are
not.
G
However,
I
did
look
at
the
Affidavit
of
compliance
with
the
notice
requirements
filed
by
the
applicant,
and
one
gentleman
mentioned
that
there
was
only
one
sign
on
the
Alley.
The
affidavit
included
numerous
photographs
of
signs
throughout
what
appear
to
be
throughout
the
block.
So,
while
tenants
may
not
receive
written
notice,
signs
are
posted
around
the
property
and
the
signs
included
both
the
rezoning
and
the
vacating
petition
and
I
assume
the
amendment
to
the
comprehensive
plan.
Thank
you,
Ms
Wells.
Thank
you.
Yes,.
I
I
K
We
have
been
in
communication
with
this
company
many
times
they
have
called.
They
have
chatted,
they
have
shared.
We
have
seen
every
schematic
they've
had
we
are
pleased
with
it.
We
think
it
looks
gorgeous
the
location.
It
is
not
deep
into
the
community.
It's
right
at
a
main,
drag
right
where,
if
you're
coming
from
downtown,
you
see
this
beautiful
building
and
you
say
I'm
home.
K
The
building
is
designed
for
the
young
people
that
professionals
growing
up
or
some
people
downsizing.
These
are
not
big
Apartments
they're
exclusive.
We
are
pleased
with
the
parking.
That's
one
of
the
things
we've
had
problems
over
the
years
projects
come
up
and
there's
no
parking.
You
can't
even
get
to
your
mailbox.
This
company
has
designed
it
so
there's
parking
for
everybody,
including
company.
K
The
other
thing
is
personal
thing.
There's
a
doggy
place,
you
don't
see
people
picking
up
doo-doo
in
my
neighborhood,
but
at
this
place
they
have
a
place
to
go.
This
company
designed
it
that
way
they
made
sure
the
neighborhood-
is
happy
a
place
for
the
residents
and
you
could
bring
any
dog
you
want.
If
you
want
to
bring
a
gorgi
from
England,
you
may
just
bring
the
limousine
too,
but
the
point
is
they
have
designed
this
property
beautifully.
K
The
traffic
is
not
going
to
bother.
We
know,
there's
going
to
be
construction,
we
know
there's
going
to
be
dust
and
everything,
but
we've
gone
through
it.
There
are
some
beautiful
projects,
not
enough
parking.
There
are
some
projects
where
it's
right
on
the
street
everybody's
parking
everywhere.
This
place
is
designed
nicely.
K
K
That
location
is
perfect
for
us
I'm
79
years
old.
What
do
I
need
a
car
for
for
two
bucks?
That's
the
perfect
way
of
going.
If
you
go
out,
you
can
go
one
way
to
the
beach.
If
you
want
to
go
another
way,
you
can
go
to
the
airport.
This
is
a
perfectly
designed.
Our
community
is
pleased
with
it
and
we
hope
you
approve
it.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
Q
Mr
chair,
if
I
may,
yes,
just
for
the
record
Louis
Vera
here,
I've
been
listening,
I
I
just
didn't
chime
in,
but
just
FYI
I'm.
Here,
sir.
Thank
you.
A
T
Good
evening,
good
evening,
my
name
is
Louis
Simmons
I,
say
1507
West
North,
B,
Street
Tampa
I've,
been
in
this
neighborhood
over
65
years.
Basically,
I
was
born
and
raised
on
Oregon
Avenue
when
the
Yellow
Cab
was
there
and
I
think
major
development
throughout
the
whole
neighborhood.
Everybody
said
what
is
consider
your
neighborhood.
My
neighborhood
is
from
Green
Street
to
Swan
from
Boulevard
to
Armenia.
That
was
my
whole
General.
Neighborhood
I've
been
in
an
area
for
over
65
years,
the
project
they're
developing.
T
We
had
meetings
and
things
about
it
and
I
had
three
basic
three
concerns
number
one:
would
it
be
housing
for
elderly
when
they
want
to
actually
move
out
of
their
house
and
scale
down?
They
say
yes,
I
think,
okay.
T
The
second
major
problem
was
when
is
like
two
seconds
of
rain
within
Florida
that
we
get
once
in
a
while.
Kennedy
Boulevard
actually
flows
up
and
when
the
developments
came
in,
it
was
talking
to
me.
They
got
they
figured
I
should
have
storm
drains
to
take
all
the
excess
water
off
the
street,
because
when
Kennedy
flows
up
everybody
have
assets
or
detour
to
North,
B
Street,
North,
Beach
Street
used
to
be
a
nice
smooth
payment.
T
Okay
about
the
building
itself.
It's
a
nice
building,
nice
structural
from
looking
at
all
the
plans.
T
Where
you
was
I
heard
you
earlier
about
the
parking
situation,
because
actually,
when
they
built
three
years
or
four
years
ago,
on
Oregon
all
the
residents
there,
they
have
in
the
surrounding
parking
inside
the
facility
and
outside
the
facility
and
helping
me
blocking
the
streets
when
they
Park
on
both
sides
of
the
street.
So,
instead
of
being
a
two-way
traffic
for
Viking,
four,
you
have
to
weave
in
out
to
actually
get
to
a
a
narrow
and
another
intercession
to
get
through.
So
now.
T
That's
the
only
thing
I
had
as
a
question
of
why
I
was
talking
to
the
developers
and
things
in
nature
there,
but
everything
else.
What
the
meetings
that
we
have
and
or
through
all
the.
T
D
T
G
Good
evening
my
name
is
Fran
powers
and
I
I'm
a
tenant
at
2105,
West,
Kennedy
I'm,
the
founder
of
power
stories
theater,
our
non-profit
theater,
resides
on
the
Kennedy
building
that
will
be
torn
down.
If
you
grant
the
the
zoning
request,
our
theater
has
served
this
community
for
20
years.
G
Our
mission
is
staging
true
stories
to
open
minds
and
hearts.
We
have
nine
staff
members
working
out
of
our
facility.
We
work
to
produce
four
professional
shows
annually.
We
have
a
global
voices
of
women,
theater
Festival.
We
do
Open
Mic
nights
workshops
and
we
have
an
award-winning
girl
stories.
Leadership,
theater
program,
young
girls
from
the
inner
city,
get
free
workshop
and
free
programming
from
Power
stories.
Theater
and
40
of
all
of
our
tickets
are
given
to
the
veterans
or
the
nonprofit
community.
G
We
are
here
to
serve
the
community
and
over
since
our
Inception
we
have
provided
services
for
over
20
000
individuals.
We
have
been
honored
at
the
White
House
for
the
work
that
we
have
done
with
our
young
girls.
We
have
received
the
community
hero
award.
One
of
our
young
girls
has
received
one
of
the
community
hero
Awards.
We
have
received
the
wedu
award
and
the
de
Barlow
Spirit
of
humanity
award.
G
We
moved
into
this
building
10
years
ago
and
planned
to
make
this
our
forever
home.
The
original
owners,
both
the
whole
Holocaust
Survivors,
operated
their
family
business,
the
Biscayne
lighting
business
there
for
60
years.
We
were
delighted
that
the
sportatorium
was
right
next
to
us,
a
very
historic,
historic,
Sports
building,
which
has
not
has
been
vacant
for
a
long
time.
The
current
owner
promised
to
do
something
with
it
never
did,
but
we
have
built
this
theater
to
empower
the
lives
of
other
people.
G
This
just
came
to
our
attention.
Whoever
was
supposed
to
do
this,
but
this
just
came
to
our
attention
two
days
ago,
so
we
have
been
trying
to
Rally
our
support.
One
of
the
mothers
of
one
of
the
girls
that
we
served
sent
me
a
very
long
email
in
part.
She
writes
power
stories
has
been
a
great
place
for
my
daughter,
Katara
and
many
of
the
young
women.
The
theater
helps
these
young
ladies
find
their
voice
and
Spark
that
fire
in
them
to
become
leaders.
G
G
O
In
the
existing
shopping
complex
on
the
chopping
block
power
stories,
theater
has
been
a
vital
and
beloved
part
of
the
community
on
Kennedy
Boulevard.
We
are
the
only
theater
that
offers
internships
to
the
students
at
University
of
Tampa
Fran
Powers
built
the
professional
non-profit
theater
from
the
ground
up
turning
it
into
a
space
recognized
even
by
Michelle
Obama
in
the
White
House
during
the
pandemic.
Despite
the
doors
being
closed,
she
never
missed
a
payment
to
the
landlord
the
architecture
plans
that
were
submitted
tonight,
weren't,
something
that
was
drawn
up
overnight.
O
O
We
have
reached
out
to
the
media
and
basically
tonight
we're
on
all
the
TV
stations.
Had
we
known
this
plan
was
in
the
works,
you
would
have
had
time
to
make
other
arrangements.
We
wouldn't
have
announced
our
23rd
season
without
having
a
viable
facility
in
place
instead
of
being
blindsided
and
having
the
rug
ripped
from
beneath
our
feet.
O
If
you
change
the
zoning,
how
are
you
going
to
help
us
relocate
and
preserve
our
22-year
history?
Our
Legacy
I
implore?
You
please,
don't
change
our
zoning
and
allow
an
outsider
to
come
into
our
community
and
destroy
the
livelihoods
of
many
small
business
owners.
Our
community
needs
and
values
the
Arts
our
community
needs
small
business.
O
A
O
O
I
am
amazed
that
they
allow
Jersey
mics
to
continue
and
and
not
these
amazing
places
that
you
know
house
these
artists,
and
so
I
I'd
like
to
plead
with
you
that
this
is.
This
is
not
just
another
development
for
Tampa.
This
is
erasing
part
of
the
culture
that
you
already
don't
have
here
and
you
need
it
very
badly
and
the
woman
here
and
the
girls
here
need
the
support
of
power
stories.
O
There
is
no
other
place
that
supports
women
and
transitions
girls
into
the
power
that
power
stories
does
I'd
like
to
just
bring
your
attention
to
the
fact
that
Tampa,
what
is
it
known
for
the
bucks
and
the
Rays
right
and
lightning?
But
it's
not
known
for
its
art.
It's
not
known
for
its
theater,
and
here
you
have
two
places
that
are
trying
from
the
roots
to
to
grow.
That
and
you're
going
to
wipe
them
out
think
about
it.
O
Think
about
it
before
you
do,
because
you
are
the
ones
who
are
the
next
holding
the
place
for
our
next
generation
and
what
will
they
have
these
girls
growing
up,
have
power
stories
they're
being
exposed
to
theater
and
culture,
which
is
really
hard
to
find
in
Florida
I'm.
Sorry,
it's
very
hard
to
find,
and-
and
this
is
a
place
where
you
can
find
it
and
to
wipe
it
out
to
wipe
out
a
100
year
old
tree
is
Florida
even
known,
Tampa,
it's
not
even
known
for
its
trees.
I
mean
come
on.
O
A
K
K
Specifically,
electric
cars
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
it
was
always
a
dream
of
mine
to
own
a
gallery
and
I'm
very
happy
where
I
am
I
am
not
against
change.
I
am
very
much
okay
with
things
changing
in
Tampa
Bay.
K
My
only
issue-
and
our
issue
is-
is
that
we're
being
displaced
and
we
were
not
given
formal
notice.
The
way
we
were
supposed
to
all
I
wanted
to
say.
A
P
Thank
you,
I
apologize,
I'm,
now
unmuted.
Thank
you
and
good
evening
for
the
record.
My
name
is
Julia
mayazelle
I'm,
an
attorney
with
the
law.
P
Firm
of
Ray
Robinson,
401,
East
Kennedy,
Boulevard
I
did
provide
you
with
some
correspondence
on
this
matter,
which
Mr
singer
did
also
address
as
well,
but
I
represent
Bill
Atkins
and
jam
Foods,
who
is
the
leasehold
interest
owner
of
the
Jersey
Mike's
and
the
Tampa
nail
salon
that
is
designated
on
the
site
plan
as
ex
retail
and
I
I
I
will
say
this
just
kind
of
listening
to
what's
happening
well.
I
do
think
that
the
the
applicant
did
make
efforts
to
reach
out
to
the
community.
P
It
does
seem
to
appear
that
they
did
not
spend
as
much
time
reaching
out
to
the
several
tenants
that
live
or
are
within
that
that
area,
so
I,
I
I,
don't
know
why
that
is,
but
that
did
occur
and
I
will
acknowledge
that,
of
course,
as
tenants,
we
don't
have
separate
rates
for
notice,
but
we
were
aware
that
this
was
moving
forward
and
I
have
been
working
with
dragons
on
that.
P
In
our
letter,
we
know
what
our
concerns
are,
but
I
think
it's
really
a
bigger
issue,
because
this
at
least
for
all
building,
it's
not
integrated
into
this
project.
It's
sort
of
an
afterthought
of
an
out
parcel
and
I
I
understand
that
that
may
be,
because
of
police
hold
interests
that
are
not
City
councils
concerned.
P
That
being
said,
when
you're
looking
at
a
project
and
you're
looking
at
it
it's
overall
capacity
and
what
you're
trying
to
accomplish
you
need
to
look
at
the
project
as
a
whole,
and
my
sense
is
this:
project
wasn't
really
looked
at
as
a
whole,
especially
it
relates
to
this
building,
as
we
indicated
and
Mr
Atkins
will
will
state.
Is
there
are
concerns
on
our
part
as
to
how
the
parking
is
going
to
work,
how
the
access
points
are
going
to
work,
how
the
grease
trap
is
going
to
be
cleaned?
P
Where
is
our
dumpster
going
to
be?
How
is
this
has
this?
What
is
really
an
out
parcel?
How
is
that
going
to
be
treated?
And
well
maybe
that's
just
a
leasehold
interest.
It's
really
not
because
the
site
plan
is
holding
that
out
and
I
think
that
that's
an
issue
that
this
applicant
does
need
to
address.
P
He
has
indicated
that
Mr
singer
indicated
that,
yes,
he
intends
to
address
it,
but
on
the
site
plan,
as
it
is
right
now,
there
is
no
indication
about
where
parking
will
be
allowed
and
how
that's
all
going
to
function
together
and
those
issues
if
they're
not
addressed
now
as
I
know,
everybody
here
is
aware.
Those
issues
will
not
be
able
to
be
addressed
later.
I
I,
again
understand
and
appreciate
everybody's
interest
here.
I
also
understand
the
other
tenants
and
where,
where
their
positions
are,
but
this
is
for
us
not
just
a
tenancy
issue.
P
M
All
right,
thank
you.
I'm
gonna,
probably
cut
mine.
A
little
shorter
Ms
Mandel
hit
on
some
of
the
points
that
I
was
going
to
make,
but
my
name
is
Bill
Atkins
I'm,
the
owner
of
the
Jersey
Mike's,
that's
on
the
the
site
plan.
M
My
sub
tenant
is
the
Tampa
nail
salon
and
we've
been
doing
business
there
for
about
10
years.
Our
situation
is
a
little
different.
Just
you
know,
I
understand
that
the
the
folks
from
the
theater
in
a
little
super
little
different
situation,
but
I
definitely
feel
for
them.
I
know
exactly
how
they're
feeling
down
there
so
hope
things
do
help
work
out
there,
but
for
myself
you
know
we
are
in.
We
are
in
opposition
of
the
site
plan
as
it's
currently
designed.
M
Currently,
as
we've
been
operating
for
10
plus
years,
we
have
20
plus
parking
spaces.
We
have
three
different
access
points.
We
have
availability
for
our
delivery
trucks
not
to
park
in
the
street
and
the
Really.
The
most
glaring
thing
we
saw
when
we
were
shown.
M
The
the
plan
was
the
reduction
in
the
removal
of
these
parking,
Fields
they're,
reducing
basically
our
parking
to
just
the
front
of
our
building
11
spaces,
we're
losing
our
access
off
Kennedy
losing
the
alley
in
the
back,
where
our
delivery
trucks
go,
which
has
access
to
our
back
doors.
M
So
we
don't
have
to
deliver
through
our
customer
lines
and
our
in
our
lobbies
and
our
Stores
and
then
we're
left
with
just
the
11
spaces
were
being
told
that
they're
going
to
move
our
parking
or
give
us
more
parking
off
site
in
the
garage,
but
all
due
respect
to
Mr
singer,
the
39
businesses
that
they've
contacted
about
this
I
wasn't
one
of
them.
I,
don't
know
anything
about
I,
see
the
plans
I
see
parking
but
they've.
Given
me
no
idea
of
where
we
get
to
Park.
Who
would
monitor
that
parking?
M
You
know
things
of
that
nature,
the
delivery
vehicle.
The
excuse
me,
the
delivery
trucks.
It's
an
issue.
I
mean
you're
not
going
to
be
able
to
pull
in
the
now
very
tight
11
space
area,
they're
going
to
be
on
the
streets
to
deliver
and
they
deliver
at
all
times
of
the
day.
You
can't
you
know
these
days,
you
just
take
what
you
can
get
so
again.
M
M
We
haven't
spoke
to
them
since
early
in
the
year
and
they've
not
talk
to
us
about
any
of
these
ideas
or
changes,
so
I'm
not
sure
what
the
other
39
businesses
discussed,
but
we
didn't
get
that
opportunity.
So
this
is
very
concerning
to
us.
I
could
have
a
tremendous
impact
trying
to
operate.
Two
full
retail
businesses
be
have
a
high
negative
impact
for
our
customers
and,
quite
frankly,
the
25
to
30
families
that
you
know
we
employ
in
that
area.
M
So
I
do
appreciate
the
time
you've
given
me
to
speak
and
thanks
thanks
very
much.
M
M
All
right,
Carlos,
Ramirez,
3103,
West,
Carmen
I,
was
approached
by
the
developer
for
the
applicant
back
in
May
of
this
year
and
I
had
a
lot
of
comments,
a
lot
of
concerns,
one
of
them
being
that
they're
called
vocal
and
they're.
Not.
However,
they
have
met
with
me
extensively.
They
have
met
with
the
community
a
lot
they
have
listened
and
now.
I
gave
Mr
singer
a
very
long
list
of
things
that
I
did
not
like
about
the
develop
development
and
Dave.
M
They've
listened
for
most
of
the
things
that
we
had
concerns
on.
So
they
came
to
our
North
Hyde
Park,
civic
association,
neighborhood
meeting
last
night
and
the
board
of
directors
voted
to
support
them.
So
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
and
then
very
quickly,
on
a
personal
level
I'm
with
councilwoman
heart
attack.
There
has
to
be
some
kind
of
protection
for
small
businesses
and
people
who
are
leasing,
big
offices
to
be
able
to
get
noticed.
M
They
never
notice
so
I
hope
to
see
that
in
a
future
Workshop
or
something
new
coming
down
the
line
also
very
quickly.
M
I
know
there
was
a
lot
about
traffic
personally
I
think
we
make
it
way
too
easy
for
people
to
park
and
drive,
which
is
the
reason
why
we
have
traffic
problems.
I
think
the
harder
we
make
it
for
somebody
to
drive
the
more
push
they'll
be
for
Mobility
Transit,
and
things
like
that.
So
just
two
personal
observations
that
I
wanted
to
give
out.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
F
F
F
Right
I
can
make
a
comment,
then
he
can
respond
to
it.
I
just
want
to
I
just
want
to
say
in
regard
to
the
public
comment,
I
personally,
in
this
board,
this
city
council
have
aggressively
supported
the
Arts
I
think
more
than
maybe
any
other
City
Council
in
the
last
three
years
we
put
in
when
it's
all
added
up,
we
will
put
in
I
think
close
to
100
million
dollars
to
support
the
Arts
and
just
through
this
through
the
crh,
just
in
the
last
three
or
four
years,
I'm.
F
Sorry
that
I
personally
have
not
been
involved
in
any
of
your
organizations
before
I
look
forward
to
getting
to
know
them.
It
is
as
a
supportive
of
Arts
I'm
sure
my
colleagues
feel
the
same
way.
It's
heartbreaking
hearing
the
stories
that
you
all
talk
about,
and
it's
also
heartbreaking,
seeing
that
you
all
haven't
been
through
this
process
before
this
is
a.
F
F
If,
if
the
community
came
to
us
and
said,
we'd
rather
have
Subway
instead
of
Mike
Subs,
we
can't
consider
that
we
can't,
we
can't
consider
it
other
than
the
actual
use
and
the
building
is
not
historic,
and
so
it's
not
protected
anyway.
There's
no
special
designation
for
the
Arts,
we're
also
so
not
allowed
to
coach
any
of
you
on
on
how
to
put
together
competent,
substantial
evidence
or
or
to
go
through
any
of
these
processes.
The
staff
may
be
willing
to
answer
questions
for
you
in
the
next
few
days.
F
With,
with
with
all
that
said,
we
have
to
look
at
the
the
evidence
as
Allowed
by
law
regarding
the
use
of
this
facility.
We
also
can't
consider
that
it's
an
out
of
town
investor,
if
it
is,
we
have
to
just
look
at
at
the
reports
by
staff
and
we
have
to
use
the
competent
substantial
evidence.
That's
been
presented.
F
The
last
thing
I'll
say
is
that
there,
if
it
if
it
passes
to
the
last
things
if
it
passes
tonight,
there's
a
second
reading
and
typically
folks
with
grievances,
have
a
discussion
with
the
applicant
between
first
and
second
reading.
Typically,
applicants
want
the
public
to
show
up
and
be
in
support
of
a
project
in
second
reading,
and
so
staff
can
advise
you
about
what
to
do
and
not
do
there
and
the
applicant
can.
F
The
last
thing
is
that
we're
not
allowed
to
even
even
have
any
kind
of
conversation
with
you
by
email
or
by
phone
and
not
during
this
process
and
then
for
30
days
thereafter,
and
if
it
turns
out
that
you're
no
longer
tenants
and
you
need
our
help
in
some
way.
Contact
us
30
days
after
and
I'm
sure,
we'll
be
glad
to
help.
Thank
you.
A
C
There's
a
time
to
have
this
discussion,
but,
frankly,
what
you
said
is
true
to
one
part
of
the
criteria.
One
part
one
item
on
the
agenda,
but
is
not
necessarily
true
to
another
part
of
the
items
on
the
on
the
agenda
that
you're
considering
but
I'll
leave
it
go
with
that.
But
the
concern
that
I
have
is
when
you
combine.
C
Hearings
and
combined
presentations
with
different
criteria
they
meld
together
and
create
a
record
that
is
hard
to
separate
and
segregate.
Now.
That
being
said
with
that
being
said,
I
understand
your
points
and
I
understand
that
Mr
singer
has
the
opportunity
for
rebuttal,
but
I
I
will
say
these
these
comments
that
I
have
for
for
another
time.
D
I
passed
the
first
one,
you
don't
know
what
you
were
talking
about
and
now
we
vote
against
the
other
one,
because
it's
going
to
happen,
a
big
old
tremendo
shoot
in
the
courthouse.
Why
you
passed
the
first
one.
Normally
there
was
attached
that
7
and
16
were
attached
to
number
one
and
I,
don't
know
if
it's
7
or
16
I
remember
something
like
that.
D
But
those
are
the
things
that
I
I
think
that
we're
trying
to
get
work
out
and
I'm
sure
that
in
the
near
future,
when
other
things
are
going
to
happen,
that
we
we've
now
heard
not
not
in
this
case
but
in
other
cases
like
similar
to
this
the
same
thing
about
the
tenant,
not
knowing
what's
happening,
and
this
is
going
on
now
for
something
and
I'm
not
referring
it
to
this
case.
I
said
it
earlier,
but
they're
they're
still
the
solid
waste
thing.
It's
a
domino
effect.
D
You
can't
have
two
cans
that
have
people
moving
at
the
same
time
and
in
the
parking
garage
for
23
percent
reduction.
That
may
be
true
that
the
people
don't
want
to
drive,
but
I
haven't
met
them
yet,
and
maybe
the
city
is
changing
a
lot
of
people
coming
in
from
New
York
living
downtown,
and
maybe
they
don't
have
to
walk.
They
don't
have
to
have
a
car.
Maybe
I
said
because
I
still
think
that
and
are
there
any
we
we're
changing
now
the
code
on
the
EV
charging
stations.
D
I'm
not
saying
this
belongs
here,
but
I'm
just
saying:
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
this
council
is
dealing
with
on
an
ongoing
basis.
Is
it
a
beautiful
building?
No,
it's
not
beautiful,
it's
gorgeous.
Is
it
needed?
Yes,
is
it
capable
of
handling
his
things?
I
would
say
yes
with
some
reservations,
but
then
you
have
the
other
things
that
you
look
at
the
loading
birth,
the
this
possible
spill
into
the
neighborhood
and
you're.
Looking
at
the
reduction
in
parking
that
maybe
the
other
six,
don't
seven,
don't
feel
that
way.
D
Six
don't
feel
that
way,
but
the
seventh
one
does
because
I
don't
believe
that
just
based
on
my
own
family,
not
only
my
grandkids
but
all
my
family's
grandkids
first
thing
they
want
is
a
car,
maybe
they
weren't
in
New
York
and
they
would
never
have
been
they've
been
to
New
York,
but
they
never
lived
there
so
that
that's
what
the
only
thing
I
can
say.
Thank
you.
D
R
Singer
Republic,
thank
you,
Mr
chair
and
thank
you
Council,
and
thank
you
for
your
attention
again.
I
know
it's
been
a
long
day
and
I
will
try
and
be
brief
and
so
I'll
address
a
few
things
in
hopefully
rapid
succession.
The
first
one
is
regarding
the
Jersey
Mike's
parcel.
R
What
you
see
here
outlined
in
Orange,
Is
The,
Jersey
Mike's
parcel,
and
it
is
the
only
piece
that
is
under
the
Jersey
Mike's
control
through
their
release,
and
that
is
important
because
what
Mr
Atkins
and
what
Miss
Mandel
were
referring
to
when
they
were
referring
to
additional
parking.
Is
this
right
here
and
this
right
here?
R
This
is
outside
of
what
they've
leased.
They
have
no
entitlement
to
it
at
all.
In
fact,
what
our
application
is
doing
and
what
this
parking
garage
will
be
doing
is
cleaning
up
problem
on
Kennedy.
This
is
not
the
first
problem
on
Kennedy
with
parking
that
you've
seen.
Retailers
are
using
parking
that
they
have
not
been
entitled
to,
and
so
here
I
would
caution
you
that
October
2012
approval
that
Miss
Mendel
referred
to
in
her
letter
was
not
actually
a
zoning
approval.
R
R
They
are
going
to
be
offered
spaces
in
the
garage
with
close
access
to
the
front
of
their
building.
Now
never
in
a
PD
is
parking
absolutely
assigned
at
the
time
of
zoning
to
a
particular
tenant.
It
is
within
your
consideration
that
there's
enough
space
is
there
to
accommodate
the
tenants
and
then
it's
between
the
landlord
and
the
Tenant
to
determine
exactly
where
it
is,
but
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
Jersey
Mike's
is
at
present
time
with
no
action
only
entitled
to
these
spaces
right
here.
R
And
I
think
that's
a
positive
change
for
Jersey
Mike's
to
say
that
Mr
Atkins,
saying
that
he
has
not
been
aware
of
the
plan.
I
think
is
belied
by
the
record
and
belied
by
Miss
Mendel,
saying
that
she's
been
in
contact
with
us
as
their
representative
since
April,
and
there
have
been
negotiations
back
and
forth
since
April
and
so
to
say,
you're
not
aware
of
a
plan.
I
think
maybe
stretches
the
bound
of
reasonableness.
R
I
want
to
point
counsel,
to
note
29
on
the
site
plan.
Note
29
says
all
move-ins
and
deliveries
utilizing
the
loading
space
shared
with
solid
waste
will
be
coordinated
by
the
leasing
office
to
avoid
conflicts
with
trash
pickup
times.
All
loading
will
occur
within
the
approved
times,
that
is
on
the
site
plan
that
has
been
negotiated
with
City
staff
and
the
applicant
and
there's
nothing
in
the
record
of
any
concern
from
any
residents
about
loading
or
about
deliveries.
R
Last
thing
that
I
would
point
you
to
again
is
the
incredible
amount
of
Outreach.
Now
we've
heard
from
some
tenants
and
I
I
share
your
frustration.
I
share
their
frustration.
We
did
the
best
we
could.
We
did
everything
we
could
under
the
code
we
held
Community
meetings.
We
knocked
on
doors
every
single
owner
has
been
aware
of.
This
has
been
involved
since
the
beginning,
the
fact
that
they
are
not
sharing
this
with
their
tenants.
R
You
can't
punish
the
applicant
for
that.
It's
not
reasonable.
Your
legal
staff
has
told
you
you
can't
consider
tenant
leases
in
this,
and,
unfortunately,
I
have
to
agree
with
them
and
I
want
to
point
you
to
the
support
that
this
applicant
has
gained
from
the
North
Hyde
Park
civic
association
and
the
North
Hyde
Park
business
Alliance,
and
how
difficult
it
is
to
get
these
Community
groups
to
embrace
a
mixed-use
development
such
as
this
there's.
Nothing
in
the
record
suggesting
that
umu
60
is
incompatible
on
the
northern
part
of
the
site.
R
There's
nothing
on
the
record,
suggesting
that
these
alleys
should
not
be
vacated.
There
is
a
robust
discussion
on
the
zoning,
but
again
the
tenants
who
occupy
the
retail
space
simply
can't
be
considered
in
your
deliberations
and
I
would
ask
that
you
respect
that.
I
think
this
applicant
has
gone
over
and
above
not
only
in
their
redesign,
not
only
in
their
Outreach
to
the
community,
but
in
their
considering
iteration
of
compatibility
with
the
Kennedy
Transit
Corridor
in
our
growing
city
and
I'd.
Ask
that
you
approved
these
three
applications.
I.
S
And
legal
is
right:
Mr
Shelby
is
right.
We
can't
intertwine
the
tenant,
but
in
my
key
mind
when
I
look
at
we
knocked
on
260
doors,
and
these
properties
are
on
the
property
you're
trying
to
get
rezoned
in
my
mind,
in
that
case,
a
knock
on
their
door
regardless,
if
they
own
the
building
or
not
it's
operating
so.
R
There
is
a
legal
problem
with
an
applicant
who
does
not
own
a
piece
of
property
coming
to
a
tenant
who
is
in
a
lease
with
another
landlord
and
discussing
a
potential
ownership
scenario.
It's
not
allowed.
It's
tortious
interference
with
their
contract.
We
we
cannot
do
it
legally
as
much
as
we
would
like
to
do
it
all.
S
Right
well,
I'm
glad
you
explained
that
for
the
record.
That's
why
I
asked
that?
Yes,
sir,
because
maybe
they
don't
know
that
they're
saying
that
they
were
notified
and
you
knocked
on
door.
So
that's
why
I
brought
that
out.
So
you
know
there's
some
legal
issues
there.
We
can't
control
that,
but
now
they
know
that
there's
a
situation,
that's
against
the
law.
Yes,
sir.
Thank
you,
sir.
R
A
M
You
very
much
Mr
chairman
I
have
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
ordinance
amending
the
land
I'm.
Sorry,
the
Imagine
2040
have
a
comprehensive
plan.
Future
land
use
element,
future
land
use
map
for
the
property
located
at
2110,
West
North,
a
105
and
107
North
Westland
Avenue
108,
North,
Albany
Avenue
number
one,
and
two
and
110
and
112
North
Albany
Avenue
from
Community
mixed
use.
It's
35,
CMB,
35,
TWO,
Urban
mixed
use,
60
umu
60,
providing
for
a
repeal
of
all
ordinances
and
conflict
providing
for
severability
providing
an
effective
date.
Second,.
B
D
F
P
I
A
S
Chairman
rez-2271
orders
represented
for
first
win
consideration
in
orders,
rezoning
property
in
the
University
of
2110
West
North,
8th
Street,
105
107
North
Westland
Avenue,
106
110
and
112
North
Albany
Avenue
108,
North,
Albany
Avenue
number
one
and
number
two
and
2101
21
17
and
2121
West
Kennedy
Boulevard
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida
a
voted
to
describe
in
section
one
from
zoning
clarification,
CG,
General,
commercial,
General
and
RM
16
residential
multi-family
to
PD
plan
developed
residential
multi-family
retail
sales,
restaurant
personal
service
provide
effective
date.
Second,.
S
All
right,
I
moved
the
on
this
RAC
2321
at
direct
religion
show
on
the
division
sheet
be
made
as
applicant
has
met
the
fruit
and
the
birth
to
provide
confidence
to
essential
evidence
that
the
development
as
conditioned
and
shown
on
the
site
plan
is
consistent
with
the
coverage
of
playing
the
city
code
and
I
find
that
the
requested
waivers
do
not
ever
to
impact
the
public
health
safety
and
general
welfare.
Compliance
with
a
couple
of
goals,
objectives
and
policy
covers
the
plan.
S
The
proposed
rezone
complies
with
land
use
policy,
9.21
and
housing
policy,
1.31,
1.3.3
and
1.3.4.
We're
seeks
to
ensure
the
adequate
supply
of
housing
for
temples.
Growing
population
encouraged,
providing
housing
through
the
Redevelopment
of
vacant
unrealized
sites.
The
rules
rezoning
complies
with
land
use
policy
61.2,
which
encourages
residential
mixed
use,
retail
service,
commercial
and
others.
Other
pedestrian
ornate
uses
alone,
mixed-use
corridors
that.
A
F
Yes,
I
just
I'm
going
to
vote
no
on
this
one
and
I
need
to
State
the
reasons
why,
based
on
the
competitive,
substantial
evidence
regarding
the
tree,
the
loading
docks,
the
reduction
in
parking
and
the
accessibility
of
the
building
and,
in
particular,
to
to
tenants.