►
From YouTube: TCC PM Pt.2 9/22/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
C
As
you
see
the
property
here
outlined
in
red,
you
have
North
Nebraska
to
the
to
the
east.
You
also
have
East
Palm
and
seventh
and
then,
of
course,
over
to
the
east,
more
you'll
run
into
Ebor.
C
C
D
C
C
More
to
the
south
on
Nebraska
here
you'll
have
the
Fawn
Factory,
which
is
to
the
south
of
the
yoga
and
tattoo
parlor.
C
C
C
G
Hi
good
evening,
Casey
feltner,
4301,
West,
Boy,
Scout,
Road,
Suite,
300
shuts
and
Bowen
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
I
I,
had
to
sit
through
the
last
few
hours,
so
I
will
be
very
very
brief.
G
I
have
to
commend
staff
for
their
hard
work
because
to
to
be
very
brief
on
the
history
of
this,
this
has
been
an
application.
That's
been
going
on
since
April
of
2021..
It
started
out
as
an
ab1.
We
then
moved
it
to
an
ab2
earlier
this
year
and,
of
course,
with
all
the
backup
and
everything
like
that,
we
completely
understand
the
City
council's
full
schedule,
and
so
therefore,
we've
been
trying
to
prepare
and
trying
to
prepare
and
trying
to
get
this
right.
Zane
has
been
working
with
us.
G
There
are
some
minor
site
plan
reductions
that
we're
willing
to
make
between
reading
one
and
reading
two.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
our
architect
was
working
with
Zane
last
week
on
making
those
that
are
denoted
in
the
staff
report
and
with
regard
to
the
waiver
again,
the
2K
Mark
is
not
the
same
use
that
we're
asking
for
here
here
we're
asking
for
a
restaurant,
even
though
the
sign
that
says
bar
signage
is
going
to
change
I
promise.
G
So
these
are
not
only
that,
but
the
applicants
here
have
a
history
in
the
city
of
Tampa,
with
alcoholic
special
beverage
leases,
they've
been
responsible,
patrons
and
they've
been
approved
before
so
with
that,
we
would
respectfully
ask
that
the
city
council
approve
the
waiver
under
the
27-132
criteria
and
allow
us
to
move
forward
to
the
second
reading,
wherein
we
can
make
the
minor
corrections
to
the
site
plan
that
the
staff
report
outlines
and
with
that
Council
I'll
yield
my
time
and
answer
any
questions.
H
Address
Ryan
Fouche,
1209,
Holmes,
Avenue
Tampa,
none
planned.
We
do
have
indoor
speakers
for
ambiance.
E
All
right
final
question:
for
the
applicant:
we
talk
about
the
restaurant
hours.
H
We're
looking
at
five
to
midnight,
possibly
hoping
for
lunch
down
the
road.
Thank
you
and.
B
I
Thank
you.
Chairman
item
number,
eight
file,
number
ab22-4
orange
theme
percent
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
orders
approving
a
special
use,
permit
Su
for
alcohol
beverage
sales,
restaurant
consumption
on
premise
only
and
making
law
for
the
sale
of
beer
and
wine
at
or
from
the
certain
lot
plot
or
track
of
land
located
at
1724,
North
Nebraska,
Avenue,
Tampa
Florida,
as
more
particularly
describes
in
section
2,
provided
that
all
ordinance
or
partial,
ordinance
and
conflict
are
repeal
providing
an
effective
date.
I
B
D
B
B
C
C
Development
coordination,
vagina
agenda
item
number
10
case
ab2
22-16,
this
being
requesting
a
special
use
to
for
a
small
venue,
beer,
Wine
and
Liquor
consumption
on
premises
at
the
locations.
1802
and
1804
East
4th
Avenue
I'll
go
ahead
and
show
the
aerial
view
of
the
property.
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
H
Okay,
I
think
Zane
did
a
great
job
of
acquainting
us
of
where
we
are
really
in
the
height
of
hard
to
be
more
cities
in
the
historic
district.
It's
the
yc7
zoning.
That's
a
mixed
use!
Category
we've
already
received
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
from
the
Barrio
Latino
Commission
for
the
design
of
this
project.
It's
a
bit
of
an
unusual
project
in
a
good
way.
So
what
you
see
on
the
left,
that's
labeled
dog
park
is
what
it's
is
correct,
that
is
a
dog
park.
H
It
is
owned
by
friends
of
Ebor
Inc,
which
is
a
non-profit
charity
started
by
Daryl
Shaw
Daryl's,
the
owner
of
the
easterly
adjacent
parcel
as
well.
So
the
idea
is
that
this
is
going
to
be
a
privately
run,
privately
managed
dog
park
that
is
open
to
the
public.
This
is
supposed
to
be
a
neighborhood
asset
and
that's
what
friends
of
Ybor
was
founded
to
do
to
put
these
types
of
neighborhood
assets,
Place,
making
opportunities
within
Ybor
City
on
the
right.
Why
we
are
here
this
evening
is
we're
constructing
a
it's.
H
It's
meant
to
look
like
a
residential
structure
and
fit
right
in
with
the
neighborhood,
but
it's
going
to
be
a
cafe
breakfast
lunch,
beer,
Wine
Place,
not
just
for
folks
who
are
at
the
the
dog
park,
but
really
for
the
entire
neighborhood,
and
there
are
also
two
fairly
small
residential
units
on
the
second
floor.
So
it's
truly
going
to
be
a
mixed-use
building.
H
One
thing
to
note
that
this
is
there's
one
on
Kennedy
there's
one
in
Nebraska,
where
they're
kind
of
bars
that
are
for
people
with
dogs
to
bring
their
dogs
and
it's
all
built
around.
That's
that's
not
really
what
this
is
well.
Dogs
are
more
than
welcome
and
certainly
encouraged
at
the
cafe.
This
is
supposed
to
be
a
neighborhood
Cafe
that
happens
to
be
next
door
to
a
dog
park.
That's
going
to
be
again
privately
managed,
privately
operated,
but
100
open
to
the
public
in
the
Ebor
Community.
H
H
It's
probably
going
to
be
well
before
that
candidly
that
there's
no
intent
to
bring
the
many
options
for
nightlife
that
are
along
7th
Avenue
new
three
blocks
south
to
Fourth,
but
just
in
the
interest
of
flexibility
we
want
to
keep
1am
as
a
an
outside
Closing
Time
Zaman
alluded
to
a
waiver.
As
you
can
see
on
screen,
there
are
two
parking
spaces
to
the
north
of
the
site.
Those
directly
serve
the
two
residential
units.
H
There,
however,
we
do
have
a
10-year
recorded
lease
for
three
parking
spaces
just
across
the
street
when
we
got
the
Barrio
Latino
commission's
approval
of
the
certificate
of
appropriateness
that
was
mentioned,
but
it
wasn't
technically
presented
to
them
as
a
variance.
So
that's
why
we
are
asking
for
the
waiver,
so
we
we're
asking
for
a
waiver
there's
only
two
parking
spaces
on
site.
However,
the
city
attorney's
office
has
approved
the
form
of
lease.
It's
already
been
recorded
in
the
public
records,
there's
a
10-year
lease
for
three
parking
spaces
that
are
literally
across
the
street.
I
B
K
I'm
sure
I'd
like
to
move
file
number
ab2-22-16.
K
Ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
ordinance
approving
the
special
use
permit
S2
for
alcoholic
beverage
sales,
small
venue,
consumption
on
premises
only
in
making
lawful
to
sale
of
beverages,
regardless
of
alcoholic
content,
beer,
Wine
and
Liquor.
On
that
certain
lot
plot
or
track
of
land
located
1802
and
1804
East
4th
Avenue
Tampa
Florida
is
more
particularly
described
in
section
two,
providing
that
all
ordinances
are
parts
of
ordinance.
That
conflict
are
appealed
providing
effective
date
seconds.
A
B
B
B
L
Staff
have
been
sworn
in.
Our
next
case
is
within
the
central
Tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
the
East
Tampa
Urban
Village.
The
closest
public
recreation
facility
is
Reagan
Park
located
approximately
two
blocks
north
of
the
subject
site
closest
Transit.
Stop
is
located
across
the
street
from
the
subject
site
on
East
29th,
Avenue
and
North
Avenida
Republica
de
Cuba
part
Route
9
connects
the
subject
site
to
downtown
Tampa
and
the
university
area
transit
center.
Subject:
studies
with
it
is
not
within
an
evacuation
Zone.
L
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
setting
the
surrounding
properties
you'll
see
the
subject
site
that's
outlined
as
purple
color.
It's
on
the
Southwest
portion
of
the
intersection
of
North
15th
Street
and
East
29th
Avenue
you'll
see
that
there
is
a
mix
of
non-residential
uses
along
this
segment
of
North
15th
Street,
as
well
as
some
residential
uses
in
the
media
surrounding
area.
L
This
is
the
adoptive
future
land
use
map
portions
of
the
site.
Fronting
North,
15th
Street
are
recognized
under
the
CC
35
designation,
while
the
Western
portion
of
the
subject
sites
recognized
under
the
residential
10
future
land
use
designation.
The
cc35
designation
runs
along
this
segment
of
North
15th
Street
and
then
it
transitions,
East
and
West
to
the
residential
10
designation.
The
Planning
Commission
staff
reviewed
the
application
found
no
adverse
impacts
to
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
L
This
portion
of
East
29th
Street
or
East
29th
Avenue
between
North
13th
and
North
16th,
excluding
the
subject
inside
as
an
existing
density
of
10.97
units
per
acre.
The
plant
development
proposes
an
overall
density
of
13.44
dwelling
units
per
acre,
which
is
comparable
to
the
density
and
surrounding
area.
The
applicant
is
utilizing
land
use
policy
5.1.6
to
weigh
the
density
permitted
under
the
cc35
designation
over
the
entire
site.
L
Through
this
PD,
the
PD
is
sensitive
to
the
surrounding
neighborhood
by
proposing
a
single-family
detached
units
to
provide
a
transition
between
an
existing
single-family
detached
unit
and
the
proposed
single-family
attached
units,
which
is
supported
by
the
comprehensive
plan.
The
PD
supports
the
mixed
use,
Corridor
policies
by
providing
sidewalks
along
the
adjacent
public,
right-of-way
and
orienting
unit
entrance
towards
a
neighborhood
sidewalk
in
the
street.
L
The
request
supports
many
of
the
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plans.
It
relates
to
housing,
the
City's
population.
The
PD
proposes
additional
housing
opportunities
in
the
East
Tampa
Urban
Village.
This
is
an
area
of
the
city
where
the
comprehensive
plan
directs
the
greatest
share
of
growth.
In
conclusion,
the
request
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
development
pattern
in
this
portion
of
the
Ebor
height
or
Ebor
neighborhood,
and
is
consistent
with
the
long-range
development
pattern
encouraged
under
the
Community
or
Community
commercial
35,
future
land
use
designation
between
first
and
second
reading.
L
L
C
This
is
Andrew,
saying
development
coordination,
I
like
to
clear
the
record
and
make
a
correction.
The
agenda
was,
there
was
a
mistype
on
the
agenda.
The
proposed
resulting
is
from
CI
and
rs62
PD.
So.
D
Is
that
a
is
the
I'm.
A
C
The
proposery
zoning
is
to
allow
for
the
development
of
two
residential
single-family
units,
as
you
have
unit
single
family
and
unit
single
family
and
14
residential
semi-detached
units
here
and
here
for
a
total
of
16
units.
So
the
excite
contains
approximately
51
621
square
feet
or
approximately
1.19
acres
is
comprised
of
block
face
of
East
29th
Avenue.
Here
to
the
north
and
North,
you
have
North
Republica
and
also
you
have
North
15th
Street
the
site
is
surrounded
as
I'll
show
you.
The
aerial
view.
C
Let's
see
the
site
here:
outliner
red,
that's
right
site
is
surrounded
to
the
north,
with
single
family,
detached
and
semi-detached
units
uses,
and
these
are
in
the
rs50
and
rm16
Zoning
districts.
There's
a
vehicle
repair
shop
in
the
CI
District,
also
further
to
the
north
residential
single
family,
detached
uses
to
the
West
in
the
rs-50.
C
C
C
Now,
development
review
and
compliance
staff
have
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
to
be
consistent
with
the
Land
Development
code.
Should
it
be
council's
pleasure
to
approve
the
application?
The
applicant
must
provide
changes
between
first
and
second
reading.
Ask
for
the
revision
sheet.
M
D
D
B
M
M
Thank
you,
Council
Catherine,
Coyle,
director
of
development,
Land,
Development
and
planning
for
domain
homes,
we're
located
at
5815,
South,
MacDill,
Avenue,
Tampa,
Florida,
33611
I
do
have
a
petition
from
some
of
the
adjacent
neighbors
around
the
block
that
we
have
them
sign
and
some
copies
of
the
site
plan
with
colors
and
where
the
grand
trees
are
located.
M
M
These
dots
represent
the
people
that
signed
the
petition.
The
small
dot
represents
the
neighbor
to
the
South
Belinda
scaglione,
who
have
been
in
communication
with.
There
was
a
dangerous
tree.
Actually
that
was
dropping
limbs
on
her
property
and
I.
Just
had
that
removed
with
City's
approval
on
an
emergency
and
I
wasn't
able
to
coordinate
back
with
her
to
get
a
an
email
back
from
her.
Anyway,
you
can
see
the
pattern
of
the
zoning
I
included
the
dots
on
each
map.
You'll
see
the
land
use
as
well
as
Mr
Collins
mentioned.
M
You
see
the
cc35,
and,
as
mentioned
in
the
staff
report
from
the
Planning
Commission,
it
is
35
units
per
acre
and
the
cc35
10
units
per
acre
and
the
flush
colored
r10.
We
are
utilizing
the
Urban
Village
policy
that
allows
us
to
spread
the
density
by
the
calculation
of
this
particular
acreage.
We
would
be
allowed
18
units,
potentially
we
are
only
seeking
16
and
I'll
go
through
the
site
plan,
just
a
second
to
show
you
how
we're
laying
that
out.
M
One
additional
map
I
wanted
to
share
with
you
is
the
existing
land
use
pattern,
and
this
is
from
the
planning
commission's
Pima
mapping
website
and
they
pull
this
from
the
property
appraiser
information
for
the
drr
codes,
the
taxing
codes.
This
is
the
property
in
the
center
and,
although,
as
in
the
zoning
and
the
land,
use
it's
pretty
solid
blocks
of
r10
and
rs50
surrounding
the
corridor,
you
will
notice
there's
much
more
of
a
scattering
of
uses
to
family
uses
throughout
the
single
family.
What
is
supposed
to
be
single
family
zoning?
M
M
If
I
go
to
the
proposed
site
plan,
I
colorize
it
to
give
you
a
better
indication
of
green
versus
building
footprint,
it
is
a
very
large
parcel.
It's
the
entire
block
face
along
29th.
What
we
have
we're,
anchoring
the
two
sides,
the
two
corners
with
the
single
family
homes
and
then
putting
in
the
townhouse
style
semi-detached
in
between
the
one
waiver
we
do
have
for
the
setback
requirement
is
to
preserve
this
codominant
Laurel
Oak.
That's
here!
M
That's
a
grand
tree
this
tree
in
the
center
right
here
is
the
one
that
is
actually
the
40
inch
C7
Laurel
Oak
almost
hazardous.
If
you
go
through
the
ratings
as
a
C7,
looking
at
the
position
of
the
buildings,
we
did
try
to
push
and
pull
the
buildings
every
which
way
we
could
to
try
to
actually
save
that
tree.
However,
there
are
some
a
few
defects
in
it
that
also
made
it
a
little
difficult
to
keep
located
in
the
center
of
the
property.
M
We
also
wanted
to
try
to
preserve
as
much
as
possible
which
we
were
actually
able
to
do.
The
East
Tampa
side
yard
setbacks
as
well
between
five
and
six
feet
between
so
it's
anywhere
from
10
to
12
feet
between
the
buildings
and
these
buildings
are
actually
typically
side.
They
are
sized
to
a
larger
single
family
style
house.
They're
they're
40
feet
wide
wide,
so
20
feet
for
each
unit.
M
They
have
15
1489
square
feet
of
living
1780,
including
the
garage
and
then
the
single
family
homes
on
the
side
are
just
shy
of
1300
square
feet,
living
and
1500
square
feet
with
the
garage
in
this
rear
yard.
Back
here
there
is
a
small,
it's
not
small.
Actually
it's
shallow
retention
area.
In
order
to
do
this,
this
is
not
planted
land
or
not
individually,
platted
Lots
here
so
we
do
have
to
go
through
the
subdivision
process
because
we
go
through
the
subdivision
process
with
the
City
Rules
that
are
in
place.
M
We
do
have
to
follow
a
commercial
standard
for
storm
water,
even
though
this
is
what
would
normally
be
a
typical
single
family
development.
So,
under
the
storm
water
Provisions
under
commercial,
we
will
have
to
create
a
specific
place
to
capture
water.
Although
each
individual
lot
measures
the
typical
lot
size
that
the
knee
stamp
a
lot
would
have,
and
we
will
be
using
our
standard,
downspouts
and
ads
pipe
and
we'll
actually
treat
each
lot
as
a
standalone
lot
for
storm
water
as
we
normally
would.
M
We
did
get
an
indication
also
preliminarily,
that
we
will
have
to
do
a
water
main
extension
along
29th.
There's
only
a
two
inch
line
out
there,
so
we
will
have
to
put
in
a
six
inch
line
as
well.
M
We
are
preserving
two
additional
Grand
trees
back
here
and
there
was
an
additional
comment
in
the
staff
revision
sheet
to
shift
this
driveway
North
just
a
little
bit.
These
are
two
palm
trees.
It's
a
three
foot
protective
radius,
so
we'll
actually
be
pulling
that
a
little
bit
to
the
north
to
preserve
those
trees,
we'll
be
redoing,
the
sidewalks
on
all
sides
per
City
standards,
and
as
mentioned
these
are
the
fronts
of
the
two
single
family
homes.
M
And
then
this
is
one
style
of
the
semi-detached
townhome.
It's
the
arched
entrances
and
the
trellises
and
the
shutters,
and
then
this
is
the
other
one
which
is
more
of
a
kind
of
our
Coastal
farmhouse
style.
We've
built
just
a
few
of
these
so
far,
they're
they're
new
in
our
repertoire,
our
portfolio.
M
This
one
is
just
finishing
up.
The
light
fixtures
still
need
to
go
in
and
a
couple
other
ornamentation
pieces,
but
these
face.
If
you've
been
by
them,
it's
a
dead
end
Street.
Actually
it
faces
I-4
on
15th
Avenue,
just
south
of
Columbus
they
sold
immediately.
They
were
I,
think
they
sold
around
279..
So
they
are.
These
are
attainable.
M
We
also
have
eight
of
these
units
going
on
at
34th
in
Louisiana
all
for
329
and
349.,
and
these
units
are
going
to
be
approximately
around
that
same
price
point:
they'll
all
be
sub
400,
mainly
going
for
families
in
the
area.
F
I
know
but
there's
12
of
them
there,
and
if
you
look
in
that
area,
there
aren't
12
driveways
on
any
neighboring
block
and
I'm,
not
I
I.
Don't
know
why
you
can't
put
it
there's
plenty
of
room
behind
and
then
ask
for
the
setback
waiver
instead
and
I'm.
Just
not
sure
why
this
sort
of
stuff
keeps
happening
well,.
M
To
put
it
in
perspective,
this
is
100
feet
deep
here
right,
putting
the
driveways
in
the
rear
the
minimum
standard
for
a
private
road.
This
goes
through
subdivision
is
35
feet,
so
we
only
have
65
feet
left
with
that
road
running
behind
us,
there's
also
the
ad
but
honestly,
the
economics
behind
it.
This
water
main
extension,
we
literally
are
just
finishing
up
one
on
15
for
those
other
units,
it
was
140
000
for
400
feet,
and
that
was
only
a
four
inch
line.
M
We're
gonna
have
the
same
expense,
if
not
more
here
with
all
the
additional
sewer
laterals,
the
utilities
are
just
not
in
this
location,
so
we
have
to
bring
all
of
that
into
this
location.
That's
for
any
development
on
this
site.
So
if
you
were
to
utilize
this
site,
as
is
under
current
zoning,
you
would
get
maybe
six,
maybe
seven
units,
this
commercial
piece
is
35
units
per
acre.
You
could
do
a
ton
on
it,
there's
just
not
utilities
or
infrastructure
for
it.
M
B
N
N
My
property
is
right
here,
so
my
concern
besides
the
density
which
I
I
understand
that
they
have
to
make
a
profit,
but
there's
a
lot
of
houses
there.
My
concern
is
this
area
right
here
we're
going
to
have
a
huge
Pond
there
it's
going
to
be
attracting
mosquitoes,
so
you
got
16
new
residents,
nine
of
us
that
are
already
there
and
all
of
us
are
going
to
have
a
pool
of
mosquitoes
and
debris
and
all
sorts
of
problems
with
that
I.
N
N
Pond
and
I
enjoy
going
out
there
and
being
able
to
enjoy
the
outsour
outdoors
and
now
I'm
gonna,
be
afraid
of
going
out
there
and
getting
eaten
up
by
mosquitoes
and
other
debris
and
things
that
fall
down,
and
although
this
has
been
something
that's
been
going
on
for
a
while.
N
If
you
saw
the
pictures
that
he
had
this
whole
area
has
been
a
huge
mess
for
a
long
long
time,
which
I'm
grateful
that
that's
going
to
be
cleaned
up,
but
at
the
same
time,
all
of
this
time
that
this
property
has
been
like
this
I've
been
dealing
with
that
tree
that
just
finally
got
removed
that
could
have
killed
my
granddaughter
and
all
of
this
stuff.
That's
back
there.
They
say
I!
Guess
it's
going
to
be
an
HOA
I,
don't
know
who's
going
to
be
responsible
to
clean
that
retention.
N
Pond
who's
going
to
be
responsible
to
to
make
sure
that
that's
safe
back
there
I
mean.
Is
it
going
to
be?
You
know
these
kids
are
going
to
be
playing
back
there
and
they're
going
to
get
into
the
pond
I'm
sure
it's
going
to
have
some
sort
of
fencing,
but
then
that's
a
problem
of
who's
going
to
make
it
clean
who's,
going
to
keep
it
from
debris,
not
only
from
the
trees
but
just
every
state
stuff
and
then
the
water.
N
Obviously
we
know
we
have
our
rains
every
day,
so
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
water
in
that
area
and
it's
a
huge
space,
as
Catherine
pointed
out
to
you,
so
I
would
kindly
request
that
something
be
done
to
re-adjust
this
area
so
that
we
don't
have
such
a
large
retention
Pond.
If
we,
if
there
has
to
be
one,
is
it
because
they
have
taken
up
so
much
of
the
land
that
there's
nowhere
for
the
water
to
go,
and
now
the
city
is
requiring
them
for
to
put
this
back
there.
N
Does
that
mean
that
maybe
one
or
two
units
needs
to
be
eliminated?
I
don't
know,
I,
don't
know.
The
answer
all
I
know
is
that
I
appreciate
that
this
is
going
to
be
done
and
that
it's
going
to
improve
the
area,
but
at
the
same
time,
it's
going
to
be
a
big
headache
for
me
and
the
rest
of
the
neighbors,
who
are
there,
plus
the
new
people
who
are
going
to
be
moving
in
I
appreciate
your
time.
Thank
you.
M
This
retention
area
and
that's
the
reason
why
I
wrote
it
as
a
retention
area,
is
not
actually
planned
to
be
wet
because
the
drainage
is
actually
going
to
be
retaining
conveyed
from
each
lot.
Unfortunately,
like
I
mentioned
because
of
the
way
the
subdivision
rules
and
the
stormwater
rules
work,
even
if
I
wanted
to
carve
this
up
and
pull
these
Lots
all
the
way
back,
and
these
would
belong
to
each
one.
M
M
It
can
it
can,
but
not
for
it
doesn't.
It
depends
on
the
storm
and
it
depends
on
the
elevations,
but
it
doesn't
have
to
hold
it
for
a
long
period
of
time.
This
is
probably
going
to
be.
Maybe
one
feet
foot
deep
at
the
center,
but
it's
also
going
to
meander
around
these
trees.
It's
not
it.
We
can't
go
into
the
protective
radius
of
these
trees.
E
And
the
the
one
of
the
she
mentioned
that
this
is
the
HOA
subdivision.
M
E
I
mean
I,
see
what
you're
trying
to
you're
trying
to
provide
housing,
but
it
just
you
know
when
I
see
these
type
of
developments
like
a
bunch
of
sardines
that
are
packed
in
there
and
in
in
years
past.
I
just
know
and
hopefully
be
good
homework.
But
sometimes
these
development
turns
into
what
I
call
rental
properties
and
it
tends
to
sometimes
hurt
neighborhoods.
It's
my
opinion.
M
B
I
The
applicant
essentially
want
to
take
some
more
time,
I'm,
not
against
it.
In
fact,
I
got
I
make
a
young
lady,
Miss
caglioni
did
call
the
office
last
week.
I
think
it
was
on
a
shirt
day
and
Mary
gave
me
three
errands
to
do.
If
she
gives
me
the
errands
and
I
got
to
go,
do
them
so
three
of
them.
This
was
one
of
them
and
it
was
about
the
tree
and
when
I
got
there,
they
were
cutting
the
limb
over
the
property
that
Mr
Cameron
was
talking
about.
I
I
M
We
still
have
to
provide
a
storm
water
retention
area
and
we
still
have
to
go
through
the
subdivision
process.
We
will
still
have
to
do
the
water
main
extension.
The
water
main
extension
comment
that
we
got
was
when
we
first
looked
at
this
and
thought
if
we
just
do
single
family,
what
is
the
potential
for
that?
And
then
we
tried
different
scenarios.
M
M
I
will
say
the
the
neighbors
that
I
did
turn
in
I
spoke
with
the
ones
that
were
there
that
day
and
they
were
very
enthusiastic
Mr
Campbell
that
faces
15th
long
time
plumber
for
Casper
company.
He
was
amazing
to
talk
to
Zenaida
who
lives
on
the
corner
directly
across
Willie
who
lives
directly
across
in
the
in
the
duplex.
M
E
I'm
not
complaining
because
the
area
needs
a
look.
You
know,
that's
why
I
said
a
lot
of
those
homes.
You
know
just
need
a
little
tender,
love
and
care
that
you
know
for
those
folks
that
are
elderly
over
there.
Older
need
money
to
rehab
their
properties,
to
bring
it
back
so
I
I
don't
have
an
issue
with
that.
That's
not
my
issue.
Just
for
the
general
public.
Some
people
understand
what
planet
and
non-platted
means.
M
Officially,
the
land
has
not
been
carved
up
legally
and
recorded
lot
by
lot
as
on
adjacent
blocks,
where
you
would
have
24
pre-platted
Lots
on
a
block.
This
is
just
a
couple:
big
Parcels
of
land
I.
B
D
C
L
Danny
Collins
with
your
planet,
commission
staff
I've
been
sworn
in.
Our
next
case
is
within
the
South
Tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically
within
the
south
of
Gandy
neighborhood.
Skyview
Park
is
the
closest
public
recreation
facility,
which
is
located
a
quarter
mile
south
of
the
subject
site.
The
site
is
not
within
proximity
to
Transit.
L
L
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject,
setting
the
sounding
properties
you'll
see
the
subject
site
it's
outlined
in
purple,
it's
generally
Southwest
of
the
South
Martindale
Avenue
and
Interbay
Boulevard
intersection,
there's
predominantly
residential
uses
along
north
of
the
subject
side
along
Interbay,
with
some
some
Light
commercial
uses
to
the
northeast
of
the
subject
site.
There's
some
vacant
land
to
the
west
of
the
subject
side,
as
well
as
some
single-family
detached
to
the
South.
L
The
subject
site
is
currently
recognized
under
the
residential
20
future
land
use
designation.
That's
our
20th
to
the
north
east
and
south
of
the
subject
site.
Our
our
10
is
to
the
West,
though
it
is
within
the
residential
20
designation.
It
is
within
the
flight
path
and
is
limited
to
10
dwellings
per
acre.
The
planet.
Commission
staff
reviewed
the
application
about
found
no
adverse
impacts.
A
surrounding
neighborhood
South,
Martindale
Avenue,
which
is
east
of
the
subject
site,
contains
residential
20
designated
Parcels
that
are
being
utilized
for
multi-family
to
family
and
detached
single-family
uses.
L
North
Inner
Bay
north
of
Interbay
is
a
detached
single
family
neighborhood,
with
our
10
designated
parcels
that
are
oriented
internally
to
South
6th
Street.
The
Planning
Commission
staff
finds
that
the
request
is
comparable
to
the
existing
density
found
in
the
media
surrounding
area
and
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
uses.
L
Sidewalks
do
not
currently
exist
along
South
Martindale,
Avenue,
Interbay
and
South
6th
Street.
The
PD
proposes
five
foot
sidewalks
Jason
in
the
site
along
South,
Martindale,
Avenue
and
interbeck
though
the
applicant
does,
did
not
provide
a
sidewalk
adjacent
to
the
site
along
South
6th
Street.
On
the
site
plan,
a
note
is
provided
to
seeing
the
developer
will
make
improvements
to
6th
Street,
which
will
include
repaving
and
widening
of
the
roadway
installing
sidewalks
and
street
lights.
The
proposed
sidewalks
along
all
Jason
rights
away
will
help
ensure
sidewalks
interconnect
with
existing
in
future
sidewalks
and
adjacent
parcels.
L
In
conclusion,
the
request
will
maintain
this
ability
of
existing
areas
while
expanding
opportunities
for
housing
choices
in
South
Tampa
planning
district.
The
request
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
this
portion
of
the
interbase
south
of
gaining
neighborhood
and
is
consistent
with
the
long-range
development
pattern
encouraged
under
the
residential
20
future
land
use,
design,
net
designation
and
within
our
MacDill
Air
Force
bike
path.
L
Plenty
commission
staff
recommends
that
the
applicant
enlist
our
20
designation
site
data
table
and
acknowledge
that
the
site
is
within
the
flight
path
on
the
site
plan
between
first
and
second
readings,
based
on
those
considerations
of
Planning
Commission
staff
lines,
the
request
consistent
with
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
This
concludes
my
presentation
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Any.
C
All
right,
the
proposed
rezoning
is
to
allow
for
the
development
of
the
property
for
five
residential
single-family
detached
units.
As
you
see
all
five
single
family,
the
property
is
containing
a
lot
area
of
38
951
square
feet
or
point
zero.
Zero
point:
eight
seven
acres
in
size,
the
lot's
currently
vacant.
At
this
time,
encompassed
to
the
North
Inner
Bay
to
the
West
you
have
Sixth
Street
and
to
the
east.
You
have
South
Martindale
Avenue
close
to
the
site.
C
C
The
lot
is
zoned
or
a
60
and
developed
with
a
daycare,
and
the
loss
of
the
East
are
Zone,
rm16
and
rs60,
and
they
are
developed
with
residential
single
family
and
multi-family
residences.
C
As
I'll
show
you,
you
have
lot,
one
has
a
square
footage
of
8925
square
feet:
Lot
2,
7,
294
square
feet,
lot,
3,
7,
563
square
feet,
we'll
add
four
7598
square
feet
and
what
five
seven
thousand
five
hundred
and
seventy
one
square
feet.
The
setbacks
are
I
suppose
to
the
north.
You
have
20
feet:
South
10
feet,
East
5
feet
and
West
5
feet.
C
C
Develop
coordination
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
to
be
consistent
with
the
Land
Development
code.
Should
it
be
staffs,
or
should
it
be
council's
pleasure
to
approve
the
project?
The
applicant
must
provide
revisions
as
per
the
revision
sheet
between
first
and
second
reading,
come
here
for
any
questions,
your
questions.
D
B
D
D
Yes,
sir,
let
me
try
the
phone
in
a
second.
If
you
don't
mind.
B
B
B
C
L
Danny
Collins
again
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff,
have
been
sworn
in.
Our
next
case
is
in
the
South
Tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically
in
the
Bayshore
Gardens
neighborhood
Fred
ball
park
is
the
closest
public
recreation
facility
being
located
0.2
miles
Northeast
of
the
subject
site.
The
closest
Transit
stop
is
located
on
the
Southeast
corner
of
the
subject
site
along
West
Bay
to
Bay
Boulevard.
L
L
This
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
The
subject
site
is
within
the
community.
Mixed
use,
35
designation
directly
to
the
north
of
the
subject
site
is
the
I
think
I
believe
that's
the
R50
designation,
CMU
35
is
to
the
west
of
the
subject
site
and
then
R35
is
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site
plenty.
Commission
staff
reviewed
the
application,
found
no
adverse
impacts
of
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
L
The
PD
proposes
a
2.0
far,
which
is
consistent
with
intensity
anticipated
under
the
CME
35
designation
surrounding
Parcels
are
designated
re3,
R50
and
residential
35,
which
all
anticipate
a
medium
to
high
density
development
pattern.
As
such,
the
funding
commission
staff
finds
the
request
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
surrounding
development
pattern.
L
The
PDA
addresses
several
the
mixed-use
corridor
policies.
Sidewalks
are
present
along
all
adjacent
rights
of
way,
and
internal
pedestrian
connections
are
provided
if
feasible,
Planning
Commission
staff
requests
that
a
crosswalk
be
provided
between
Parcels
one
and
two
across
the
dry
valve
from
South
Isabella
Avenue
between
first
and
second
readings.
This
revision
will
help
ensure
the
sidewalks
interconnect
with
the
existing
and
future
sidewalks
on
the
property.
L
In
conclusion,
the
proposed
PDA
rezoning
would
allow
for
development
that
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
areas,
consistent
with
the
development
pattern
anticipated
under
the
CME
35
designation,
based
on
these
considerations,
the
Planning
Commission
staff
lines,
the
request,
consistent
with
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
This
concludes
my
presentation
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Any.
C
C
The
proposery
zoning
is
to
allow
for
development
of
the
property
with
an
office,
business,
professional
retail
sales,
a
restaurant,
Barn,
lounge
and
residential
multi-famil
uses.
The
subject
site
contains
a
lot
area
of
3.56,
Acres
or
155
073
square
feet
in
size
to
the
West
you'll
have
residential
multi-family
and
business
professional
office
uses
along
here
along
to
the
west
and
north
and
south
you'll.
Have
the
Selma
Expressway
to
the
east?
You'll
have
Bayshore
Boulevard
to
the
South
you'll,
have
residential
multi-family
and
to
the
north
you'll
have
residential
residential
multi-family
and
Commercial
uses.
C
So
there's
two
Parcels:
you
have
parcel
one
and
parcel
two
parcel.
One
includes
an
office
business,
professional
and
retail
sales.
You
also
have
a
restaurant
here
and
also
you
have
a
bar
lounge
partial
one
is
going
to
be,
is
proposed
to
be
1.82
Acres
or
79
366
square
feet
for
a
maximum
height
of
250
feet.
C
Setbacks
are
to
the
north
15
feet,
South
5,
feet,
East,
5
feet
and
West
20
feet.
Parcel
2.
is
proposed
to
be
residential
multi-family.
There
are
73
residential
multi-family
units,
partial
two
is
1.74
Acres
or
75
794
square
feet
with
a
maximum
height
of
274
feet
with
24
stories.
C
C
C
C
Development
review
and
coordination
have
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
it
overall
to
be
inconsistent
with
the
city
of
Tampa
Land
Development
code.
Should
it
be
council's
pleasure
to
approve
the
application?
The
applicant
must
provide
revisions
between
first
and
second
reading
as
per
the
revision
sheet.
Thank
you.
Councilman
Goods.
C
Sir
proposed
parking
from
605
required
to
458
being
proposed
24
reduction.
H
H
H
You
have
a
pretty
good
sense
of
where
the
site
is.
That's
exactly
what
it
looks
like
now,
as
you're
coming
off
the
Bayshore
going
west
towards
the
on-ramp
to
the
crosstown,
it's
about
three
and
a
half
acres
I.
Think
it's
really
important
to
note
that
there's
been
several
zoning
changes
for
this
land.
Zane
mentioned
the
residential
part
that
was
approved
back
in
2016..
We're
not
proposing
any
changes
to
that.
That's
not
new!
We
don't
even
own
it
anymore.
That's
a
condo!
That's
that's
being
constructed
all
we're
talking
about
today.
H
Is
the
office
building
we're
not
talking
about
tearing
it
down
we're
not
talking
about
any
footprint
changes
at
all.
All
we
are
here
to
do
is
reduce
the
office
entitlements,
slightly
increase
the
restaurant
entitlement
slightly
solely
as
to
the
first
floor
and
that's
a
somewhat
insubstantial
change.
Under
the
code,
that's
actually
enough
of
a
change
to
bring
this
already
approved,
pde
right
back
to
you.
So
that's
why
we're
here?
H
For
that
fairly
narrow
purpose
and
to
reiterate
we
are
not
here
about
the
red
part
just
about
the
blue
part
in
terms
of
the
numbers
we're
talking
about
a
reduction
in
the
office
square
footage
by
13
000
square
feet
in
addition
of
restaurant
retail
square
footage
of
21
000
square
feet.
The
idea
is
that
the
first
floor
of
the
the
buildings,
the
The
Office
Buildings,
really
be
devoted
to
residential
retail,
sorry,
retail
and
FNB
food
and
beverage
uses
to
support.
So
the
growing
density.
That's
around
this
area
in
lieu
of
office.
H
The
office
will
continue
to
be
the
primary
use
for
the
rest
of
the
floors
and
then
we're
proposing
the
addition
of
a
restaurant
potential
bar
use
on
the
rooftop.
I
would
note
that
the
only
portion
of
this
building
right
now
that
is
wet
zoned
is
The.
Counter,
Culture,
restaurant,
so
any
alcohol
service
in
any
of
these
new
restaurant
or
retail
entitlements
that
we're
seeking
will
come
before
you
through
a
separate,
wet
zoning.
But
that's
not
not
before
you
this
evening.
That's
what
we
have
in
mind
for
what
the
building
will
look
like
yeah.
H
It's,
it's
pretty
amazing
what
you
can
do
with
with
re-skinning
the
building
as
it's
referred
to.
So
this
would
significant
changes
to
the
windows,
the
exterior
facades,
looking
sort
of
a
green
wall
concept
on
the
the
easterly
building
a
little
bit
closer
shot
there
as
xenology
on
the
staff
side,
are
fortunate
to
have
support
from
a
lot
of
reviewing
agencies,
including
the
Planning
Commission.
We
do
not
have
support
from
Transportation
because
we're
seeking
a
parking
waiver
and
I'd
like
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
that
right
now.
Randy
is
here
to
go
into
detail.
H
If
anyone
has
questions,
but
there's
really
three
motivating
reasons
for
the
the
part
introduction.
The
first
is
that
this
is
a
cluster
of
emerging
residential
density
that
didn't
exist
at
all
five
years
ago.
Right
now,
you've
got
over
500
units
that
are
within
well,
not
much
more
than
a
quarter
block
the
Monte
Carlo
you
can
see
on
screen.
That's
been
there
for
some
time,
but
if
it's
Carlton
development
you
have
Aquatica,
which
is
literally
across
the
street,
it
was
shown
in
Zane's
photo
slideshow.
H
You
have
altura's
development,
which
is
that's
the
parcel
I
told
you
we're
not
talking
about
that's
literally
next
door
to
us.
That's
over
70
units,
so
this
isn't
really
a
nice
emerging
cluster
of
residential
density
that
that
did
not
exist
before
and
the
goal
of
this
type
of
use,
the
rest
of
the
retail
restaurant
you
use
is
to
have
this.
H
You
know
be
akin
to
a
much
much
smaller
scale,
but
version
of
a
Hyde
Park
Village,
where
it's
very
compatible
fits
in
with
the
community
around
it,
and
the
anticipation
is
that
a
lot
of
the
the
patrons
of
the
establishments
that
are
going
to
be
going
in
are
folks
who
live
with
within
a
quarter
mile,
which,
even
by
Tampa
standards
we
think
is
a
very
reasonable
amount
of
distance
to
walk
and
not
to
drive.
The
second
element
of
the
parking
reduction
request
is
the
overlapping
nature
of
the
uses.
H
It's
really
just
the
folks
who
are
there
at
the
very
end
of
the
day
and
that's
when
the
retail
restaurant
use
is
really
amping
up
and
we
have
really
over
301
spaces
dedicated
to
the
combined
office
retail
residential
uses,
which
we
think
is
more
than
appropriate,
and
the
third
reason
too
is
and
Randy
can
talk
about
this
in
Greater
depth
desires.
Is
that
the
literature
from
ite
here
at
the
ite
trip
manual
here
at
Uli
and
their
recommendations
on
parking
that
hasn't
really
caught
up
to
the
the
normal,
the
whatever
New
Normal
environment?
H
This
is
where
there
is
a
greater
tendency
to
work
from
home
and
we're
not
assuming
that's
going
to
last
forever,
but
I
think
the
assumption
that
every
single
one
of
these
office
units
is
going
to
have
is
going
to
be
fully
occupied
for
the
full
work
day.
We
don't
think
that's
an
assumption
that
we
can
rely
on
into
the
future,
but
that
is
what
our
parking
is
based
on.
So
in
conclusion,
we
think
there's
more
than
enough
parking
to
service
this
development.
It's
absolutely
not
in
our
interest
to
under
park.
A
In
all
right,
I
am
a
resident,
and
do
you
swear
or
affirm
that
the
testimony
that
you're
about
to
give
is
the
truth
in
nothing
but
the
truth?
Thank
you.
Yes,
I'm
Pamela,
Carpenter
resident
25-year
resident
in
the
neighborhood
we
were
able
to
meet
with
the
developers.
They
answered
all
of
our
questions,
except
one
that
I'd
like
to
reconfirm.
A
A
sidewalk
on
Isabella,
which
is
currently
parallel,
but
the
rendering
does
show
a
sidewalk
so
that
sidewalk
would
connect
to
the
next
development
in
the
parcel
of
El
Toro,
but
there's
currently
no
sidewalk.
It's
currently
parallel
parking
on
the
street.
H
Tyler
Hudson
for
the
record.
We
were
familiar
with
Miss
harpinger's
concerns.
There
is
a
sidewalk,
it's
it's
not
out
of
the
generosity
of
our
heart.
It's
part
of
the
required
bonus
agreement
that
this
property
is
subject
to
you
back
in
2016,
so
there
will
be
a
sidewalk
exactly
as
shown
on
the
renderings
running
along
the
north
side
of
the
Isabella
right
away
for
the
property.
So
thanks.
B
E
Rez-22-72
was
representative
for
first
reading
consideration
and
on
this
rezoning
property,
the
University
of
2907
West
Bay
to
Bay
Boulevard
and
Foley
number
one,
two,
seven
zero,
eight
three
point:
four
zeros
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida
airport
is
described
in
section
one
from
zoning,
District
classification,
PD
plan
development
to
PD
plan,
Development,
Office,
business,
professional
retail
sales,
restaurant
bar
Slash,
Lounge
and
residential
multi-family
providing
effective
date.
Second,.
A
B
D
A
D
Yesterday,
good
evening,
Council
my
name
JD
I'm,
with
sikimal
Engineering,
8370,
West,
Hillsborough,
Avenue,
Suite
205
down
by
Florida
three
three,
six,
one,
five
and
I
have
already
sworn
just
make
it
quickly.
As
you
see,
the
staff
from
the
application
request
is
consistent
with
the
city
of
Tampa
LDC
requirement.
D
J
F
File
number
Rez,
22-51
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
6202
Interbay
Boulevard
and
6001
South
Martindale
Avenue
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
and
more
particularly
described
in
Section
1
from
zoning
District
classification,
rs-60,
residential
single
family
and
CN
commercial
neighborhood
to
PD
plan
development,
residential
single-family
detached
providing
an
effective
team.
I.
I
K
Yes,
sir,
if
I
may
I
just
have
one
quick
one
open
my
phone
I'm
getting
everywhere.
I,
don't
know
about
you
all,
but
everywhere
I
go
I,
get
questions
about
the
Bloomberg
contract,
and
so
I
would
just
like
to
make
a
motion
to
ask
City
staff
to
report
to
council
during
staff
reports
on
October
20th
as
to
an
update
on
the
Bloomberg
agreement,
including
how
many
consultants,
the
Departments
they
are
embedded
in
and
any
advice
given
to
date.
J
October
20th
November
November
3rd.
You
only
have
10.
K
D
K
B
D
J
I
B
Made
by
councilman
Miranda
seconded
by
councilman
matiskovco,
all
in
favor,
aye,
councilman
Vieira.
J
Nothing
at
all,
sir
I
I
did
want
to
add
to
the
Bloomberg
motion
that
I
I
have
been
asked
about
that
as
well.
That
heard
some
things
and
so
I'd
be
very
interested
in
in
in
hearing
about
that
again,
just
a
lot
of
interesting
things
out
there,
so
just
interested
in
that
as
well.
Thank
you,
sir.
B
J
B
Moved
to
to
invite
Miss,
Beth,
Alden
executive
decorator
director
excuse
me
of
Hillsborough
County
Transportation,
Planning
organization
TPO
and
speak
to
Tampa
City
Council.
Regarding
the
tpo's
September
vote
to
amend
the
memorandum
of
understanding
mou
between
the
TPO
and
the
City
of
Tampa
and
provide
input
for
the
2022
membership
appointment
plan.
I
would
like
her
to
present
October
6th,
regular.