►
From YouTube: TCC 8/4/22 PM
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
This
is
the
august
4
2022
evening
meeting
of
the
tampa
city
council
held
in
city
council
chambers
in
the
third
floor
of
old
city
hall,
315
east
kennedy
boulevard
here
in
tampa
florida.
The
public
is
able
to
watch
this
attend
this
meeting
in
person
or
view
it
by
cable,
television
on
spectrum,
channel
640
or
frontier
channel
15
or
by
the
internet
via
www.tampa.gov.
C
Livestream,
the
public
is
also
able
to
participate
in
this
meeting
either
here
in
person
in
city,
council
chambers,
or
virtually
by
way
of
communications,
media
technology
or
cmt.
However,
the
use
of
cmt
does
require
pre-registration
with
the
city
clerk's
office.
Directions
for
pre-registration
are
included
in
the
notice
of
the
meeting
and
on
the
agenda.
C
Also,
if
the
matter
is
quasi-judicial
such
as
a
rezoning
or
special
use
public
hearing,
the
members
of
the
public
may
still
participate
remotely
via
cmt,
but
cell
phones
and
smartphones
are
not
compatible
as
they
will
not
allow
your
camera.
When
connected,
you
must
have
access
to
a
cmt
device,
such
as
a
tablet
or
computer
equipped
with
a
camera
and
a
microphone
that
will
enable
you
to
be
seen
and
heard
by
city
council
and
all
other
participants
in
a
quasi-judicial
matter.
Could
I
please
have
a
motion
waiving
city
council
standard
rules?
A
C
Then,
just
briefly
and
speaking
of
the
chair,
we
have
a
big
crowd
tonight,
so
if
you
can
make
sure
your
cell
phones
are
silenced
and
keep
the
discussions
down
to
a
minimum,
thank
you.
A
D
A
D
A
D
E
A
D
A
D
D
The
applicant
is
requesting
that
that
be
moved
ahead
of
item
number
five
this
evening,
and
it
is
certainly
up
to
council,
but
we
would
suggest,
maybe
if
council
would
consider,
maybe
asking
the
applicants
which
are
further
on
the
agenda
if
they
are
okay,
with
these
items
being
moved
forward,.
F
Yes,
good
evening,
council
tyler,
hudson
400
north
ashley
drive.
We
would
request
moving
up
to
number
five.
Six
and
seven.
Our
application
is
actually
the
oldest
zoning
application
on
the
agenda,
but
we
have
no
interest
in
getting
ahead
of
the
folks
who
are
here
in
the
room
right
now
who
have
some
interest
in
item
number
one.
We
have
a
fair
number
of
community
supporters
who
are
here
and
we're
concerned
if
we
are
dead
last
that
none
of
them
will
be
able
to
participate.
So
it
would
respectfully
ask
to
move
to
number
five.
A
F
A
And
and
mr
hudson,
the
request
is
because
you
have
people
here
that
are
willing
to
want
to
speak
to
these
agenda
items.
Yes,.
E
That's
fine
move
to
move
them
up
right
after
four.
A
D
A
H
Mr
thank
you
so
much.
Zane
hussain
development
coordination
agenda
item
number
one
case:
r,
a
z
22-24.
This
is
being
present
for
first
reading
consideration
at
the
location.
Four
one
one
one
west
san
carlos
street
proposed
resulting
from
rs
75,
residential
single
family
2pd,
planned
development,
residential
single
family
detached
now
council.
You
may
be
reminded
of
this
case,
as
it
was
originally
heard
on
june
9th
2022.
H
The
original
analysis
was
based
on
a
lot
size
of
60
feet,
not
75
feet.
The
use
was
stated
as
single
family
attached
and
the
block
face
analysis
was
west
san
carlos
instead
of
south
cameron
avenue.
So
a
revised
staff
report
has
been
submitted.
The
site
plan
was
also
submitted,
and
this
is
just
for
first
reading
again
to
clear
the
record
of
those
three
items.
I'll
now
pass
along
to
our
planning
commission.
H
Good
evening,
thomas
with
your
planning
commission
staff,
this
is
located
in
the
south,
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
the
are
you
able
to
see
the
screen
there.
It
is
okay,
this
is
located
in
the
south,
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
the
palmacio
west
neighborhood,
the
closest
transit.
Stop
is
0.4
miles
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site
at
the
intersection
of
west
san
carlo
street
and
south
dale,
maybe
highway.
H
The
closest
recreational
facility
is
a
fourth
of
a
mile
to
the
south
of
the
site,
and
the
site
is
located
in
a
level
b.
Evacuation
zone.
H
Here
is
an
aerial
of
the
subject
site.
As
you
can
see,
the
surrounding
area
is
largely
single-family
detached
homes.
A
fourth
of
a
mile
to
the
north
west
is
henderson
boulevard.
Where
light
commercial
uses
can
be
found,
and,
additionally,
south
male,
that
south
dale
mabry
highway
is
within
a
half
mile
to
the
east,
which
also
contains
light
commercial
uses.
H
Here
is
a
map
of
the
future
land
use
designation.
The
site
is
currently
recognized
under
the
r6
future.
Land
use,
designation
and
the
surrounding
area
is
largely
made
up
of
the
r6
designation.
Once
you
move
north
and
west,
you
can
get
to
this
purple
color
along
henderson
boulevard,
which
is
the
community
of
mixed
use.
35.
H
H
And
then
this
blue
color
over
here
is
public
semi
public,
which
is
some
private
schools.
Some
public
schools
and
a
recreational
facility
on
this
portion
of
west
san
carlos
street
between
south
louis
avenue
and
south
clark
avenue
excluding
the
subject
site,
has
an
existing
density
of
4.56
units
per
acre
and
the
portion
of
south
cameron
avenue
between
west
san
miguel,
street
and
west
san
carlo
street.
Excluding
the
subject
site
has
an
existing
density
of
4.51
units
per
acre.
H
The
proposed
request
would
allow
for
development
that
is
similar
in
form
height
and
scale
to
the
surrounding
residential
uses
on
this
portion
of
west
san
carlo
street
and
south
cameron
avenue.
The
proposed
rezoning
supports
many
of
the
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plan
as
it
relates
to
housing
the
city's
population.
The
tampa
comprehensive
plan
encourages
new
housing
on
vacant
and
underutilized
land
to
ensure
an
adequate
supply
of
housing
is
available
to
meet
the
needs
of
tampa's
present
and
future
populations.
H
H
H
H
Vehicular
access
as
there's
two
dwellings
for
dwelling
number.
Two
south
cameron,
see
south
cameron,
delay
number
two
and
vehicle
access
for
dueling
number
one
is
from
west
san
carlos
street.
H
H
H
B
E
I
Thanks
for
your
patience,
council
kevin
really
four
winners:
jackson
street
here
for
the
applicant,
as
zane
noted,
you
all
have
seen
this
application
before
travis
hills
presented
last
time.
Given
the
the
questions
with
the
record
and
the
the
concerns
on
second
read:
the
property
owner
came
to
our
firm
and
asked
for
us
to
assist
on
on
this
reading.
To
ensure
the
record
is
appropriate
to
preserve
the
record.
I
You
know
I
don't
mean
to
be
too
repetitive
here,
but
I'm
going
to
go
through
the
our
presentation
quickly
on
on
some
of
the
facts
that
staff
noted
again:
general
location,
411,
west,
san
carlo
street,
south
of
henderson
boulevard,
east
of
lowest
and
palmacio
west
future
land
use
map.
As
planning
commission
staff
noted.
I
This
is
r6,
which
is
low
density,
residential,
essentially
single-family
detached
for
the
larger
area
and
the
proposal
it
conforms
and
is
compatible
and
consistent
with
the
r6
lane
use
category.
As
planning
commission
staff
noted
the
zoning
map,
the
the
larger
area
is
currently
zoned
rs-75.
I
As
staff
noted,
you
know,
a
significant
number
of
the
lots
do
conform
with
this,
but
the
the
underlying
plat
does
have
smaller
lots
and
with
zoning
conformance.
There
are
also
a
large
number
of
lots
that
are
less
than
75
feet
in
the
neighborhood,
as
we'll
discuss
in
a
little
more
detail
later
important
for
this
application,
the
request
to
use
a
pd
will
allow
for
a
55-foot
frontage.
However,
the
minimum
lot
size
of
7
500
square
feet
and
the
dimensional
limitations
of
rs-75
were
included
in
this.
I
I
The
request
itself
is
to
rezone
from
rs
75
to
pd,
using
rs-75
relevant
standards
with
no
waivers.
The
request
is
for
two
single
family
detached
dwelling
units,
as
shown
here
further
on
the
request,
is
to
create
two
lots,
but
it's
actually
not
creating
two
watts.
It's
reverting
to
the
existing
lots,
7
and
10
on
the
plot.
I
That's
there
today
the
lot
size
and
each
would
be
76
45
square
feet
which
is
compatible
and
consistent
with
rs
75,
but
also
with
the
r6
underlying
future
land
use
category
and
then,
of
course,
the
the
crux
of
the
pd
request
is
to
use
that
55-foot
frontage,
that
the
plat
provides
for
consistency,
comprehensive
planning
staff
found
the
request
consistent,
noted
a
number
of
land
use
objectives
and
policies
that
are
satisfied
specifically
that
the
request
would
allow
for
development
that
is
similar
in
form
height
and
scale,
and
noting
that
the
comprehensive
plan
encourages
new
housing
on
vacant
under
utilized
land.
I
I
understand
that
adding
one
house
is
not
going
to
solve
the
housing
crisis,
but
110
foot
lot
in
the
urban
core
of
the
city
is
is
under
utilized
land
for
consistency
with
land
development
code.
This
is
very
straightforward.
Just
showing
you
an
excerpt
from
the
staff
report
here,
every
department
found
it
consistent,
so
the
application
is
consistent
with
the
land
development
code.
I
Regarding
compatibility
plan,
commission
staff
noted
that
the
proposed
request
would
allow
for
development
that
is
similar
to
form
height
and
scale.
As
I
noted,
and
one
of
the
concerns
on
the
first
or
sorry,
the
second
reading
was
that
the
the
analysis
was
done
with
the
frontage
on
west
san
carlo
street,
but
plane.
Commission
staff
report
was
not
updated
because
planning
commission
staff
had
already
analyzed
this
with
respect
to
west
san,
carlos
and
cameron
avenue,
and
then
development
coordination
staff
found
the
pros
development
is
appropriate,
location
and
compatible
with
a
surrounding
residential
neighborhood.
I
There
are
no
waivers,
so
your
professional
staff.
The
expert
opinion
showed
that
the
request
is
consistent
compatible,
but
we
want
to
offer
a
couple
of
extra
facts
here
for
the
board
to
consider
regarding
compatibility.
So
what
I
hope
to
describe
here
on
this
slide
is
a
few
different
ways
to
look
at
this.
So
the
first
way
that
I
looked
at
this
when,
when
being
introduced
to
the
application,
was
the
block
face
which
we're
talking
about
cameron
avenue.
I
If
this
is
approved,
five
of
the
eight
lots
would
follow
the
plotted
lap
platform
flat
lot,
which
is
55
foot
lots.
Approximately
the
the
plot
allows
that
one
of
the
lots
is
57
feet,
but
for
for
all
useful
purposes
it's
a
plot
of
55
foot
lots
along
cameron
avenue.
I
Then
you
can
look
at
the
actual
block
block
23
of
the
platte,
which
is
bordered
by
san
miguel,
san
carlos
cameron
and
clark.
And
if
you
look
at
that
block,
it's
approved,
seven
of
the
nine
lots
would
follow
the
the
plotted
lot
development
pattern,
which
we
believe
also
shows
consistency,
and
you
can
extend
a
little
bit
further
here
and
there
there's.
You
know,
infinite
number
ways
you
can
do
this,
but
to
simply
show
what
I'm
trying
to
get
across
here.
I
If
you
take
everything
across
the
rights
of
whey,
from
block
23,
you're
left
with
23
parcels
and
if
approved
15
of
those
23,
lots
are
less
than
75
feet,
so
65
would
be
less
than
the
rs
75
frontage
requirements
show
that
the
request
here
is
not
incompatible.
In
fact,
it
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
area.
I
Now
I
want
to
talk
briefly
about
the
previous
hearings,
we're
establishing
a
new
record
here
today.
So
when
I
talk
about
the
approval
of
the
council
at
that
hearing,
I'm
not
suggesting
that
that
is
some
sort
of
evidence
for
today.
But
I
do
want
to
talk
about
what
council
put
in
the
record
that
day.
So
at
first
reading
there
was
significant
opposition.
There
was
an
approval
vote
five
to
two
and
notably
of
those
five
yes
votes,
four
of
them.
I
Four
review
council
members
went
on
the
record
and
said
we
hear
the
opposition
and
of
course
I'm
paraphrasing
here
but
but
went
on
the
record
to
say,
but
we
see
compatibility
here
and
supported
the
motion,
then
they
came
for
a
second
read
on
july
14th
and
there
was
a
problem
with
the
record
called
out
and
of
course,
I'm
sure
the
council
members
remember
that,
but
that
that
problem
was
not
identified
on
the
record
staff
said
that
there
was
concern
that
the
record
needed
to
be
modified
to
ensure
that
the
record
was
was
appropriate
for
a
quasi-judicial
hearing,
and
so
this
was
continued,
but
really
in
a
manner
speaking
remanded
here
today
for
first
read
so
the
record
changes
as
as
staff
noted,
the
staff
report
mentioned
a
65
or
sorry
a
60
foot
lot
instead
of
a
75
foot
lot
and
it's
the
staff
report
also
listed
single
family
attached.
I
Additionally,
the
block
face
analysis
was
based
on
west
san,
carlos
instead
of
south
cameron
avenue,
but
notably
on
june
9th,
the
the
staff
presented
a
presentation
discussing
the
change
from
rs
75,
residential
single
family,
to
pd,
residential
single
family
detached
and
on
the
record
noted
detached,
not
attached.
So
I
I
would
suggest
to
council
that
those
first
two
issues
are
are
not
substantive
changes
from
what
you
all
heard
on
june,
9th
in
chambers.
I
Additionally,
as
staff
noted
tonight,
the
analysis
was
reconducted
considering
west
ham.
Carl
sorry
excuse
me
considering
wes
cameron
as
the
frontage
and
noted
the
same
conclusion
that
we
have
consistency
and
compatibility.
So
there
are
no
substantive
changes
from
the
record
you
all
heard
on
june
9th.
There
are
no
changes
to
the
design
of
the
application
before
you
today.
I
I
In
conclusion,
the
goal
here
is
to
utilize
a
pd
to
develop
consistent
with
the
nearby
scale
of
the
neighborhood.
The
development
standards
chosen
are
meant
to
enhance
compatibility.
The
architectural
design
actually
move
back
to
that.
For
a
moment,
the
architectural
design
itself
is
actually
meant
to
ensure
compatibility.
I
The
top
picture
there
shows
lot
7
that
structure,
having
only
a
frontage
on
cameron.
It
has
the
architectural
design
and
detail
on
cameron,
but
you
can
see
the
additional
architectural
detail
on
the
corner
lot
to
ensure
that
there
is
the
frontage
on
camera
and
there
on
the
left
with
that
entrance,
but
then
also
on
the
side
with
the
vehicular
access,
there's
still
architectural
design,
so
that
the
neighborhood
isn't
looking
at
a
blank
wall
face
along
with
san
carlos.
I
K
A
L
N
N
P
K
A
A
K
Our
board
has
voted
to
oppose
this
rezoning
and
I'm
here
tonight
to
speak
as
both
the
president
and
the
homeowner
within
sight
of
the
subject
property.
I
know
this
neighborhood
well
and
I
care
about
preserving
the
good
things
in
it.
We
were
never
asked
to
meet
with
the
owners
to
discuss
this
rezoning,
but
we
have
in
the
past,
with
similar
variances
and
so
on,
there's
an
inconvenient
truth
that
the
city
staff
has
not
brought
to
your
attention.
K
It
directly
affects
this
lot
split
in
2012,
the
owner
of
this
property
at
2401
cameron
avenue,
which
is
diagonally
across
the
street.
I
have
a
sticker
on
there
that
shows
that
filed
a
rezoning
pd
to
split
that
lot
and
build
two
houses:
abby
feeler,
who
abby
feely,
who
was
then
a
staffer,
visited
the
neighborhood
and
wrote
the
staff
report,
which
you
have
in
front
of
you.
K
The
recommendation
and
I'm
quoting
was
the
development
review
committee
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
a
request
inconsistent
with
city
land
development
code.
Her
report
uses
the
term
inconsistent
four
times
and
in
her
oral
presentation
she
outlines
why
lot
splitting
is
inconsistent
with
the
predominant
pattern
of
the
surrounding
area.
That's
that's.
All
in
that
report,
city
council
voted
to
deny
that
rezoning,
pd,
councilman
miranda
voted
to
deny
that
a
single
family
house
was
subsequently
built
on
that
lot.
Now.
K
K
As
the
famous
catcher
yogi
berra
would
say,
it's
like
jesus
all
over
again
on
july
12th,
four
of
us
from
the
neighborhood
met
with
abby,
philly
and
lashawn
dock
for
30
minutes.
We
asked
why
the
prior
report
was
not
considered
as
a
precedent
for
the
same
pd
across
the
street.
Abby
said
that
her
report
was
correct
and
she
stands
by
the
recommendations,
so
we
were
quite
surprised
when
the
new
revised
report
said
that
the
lot
split
on
san
carlos
was
consistent
in
the
2012
report
isn't
even
mentioned
in
there.
K
This
is
this:
was
the
new
information
brought
to
their
attention
that
lashon
alluded
to
at
the
second
hearing?
That's
what
caused
it
to
be
cancelled.
In
my
opinion,
this
is
a
quasi-judicial
hearing
and
you
should
look
back
on
prior
decisions
for
guidance.
So
now
you
have
three
staff
reports,
one
that
was
so
confusing
and
inaccurate.
K
Furthermore,
staff
believes
that
the
block
face
which
isn't
in
the
code
anywhere
we.
I
don't
know
that
I
know
what
block
face
means,
but
it's
certainly
not
part
of
your
code.
Of
four
lots
on
the
east
side
of
cameron
is
the
most
important
factor
in
their
analysis
and
overrides
all
the
other
lots
that
you
see
on
that
color
map.
In
fact,
you
really
can
ignore
the
colors
on
that
map.
This
is
blue
versus
all
of
the
other
colors
that
are
on
there,
which
are
all
60
feet
and
larger.
The
the
blue
lots
are
well
I'll.
K
This
is
cherry-picking
when
the
truth
is
that
90
of
the
214
lots
on
that
map
are
wider
than
60
feet
and
70
percent
are
wider
than
70
feet.
They
clearly
meet
our
zoning
when
promising
west
was
owned.
Rs-75,
these
blue
lots
were
grandfathered
in
they're,
still
buildable
lots,
but
but
they
don't
meet
the
current
zoning
and
those
all
have
have
houses
on
those.
These
blue
lots
are
not
representative
of
the
neighborhood
and
creating
two
more
is
inconsistent
with
palmisia
west,
which
has
almost
600
homes.
K
If
you
expand
that
out
to
the
borders
of
dale,
mabry
and
morrison
avenue,
the
petitioner
and
staff
want
to
I'm
quoting
re-establish
the
platted
lots
for
the
remainder
of
the
block
face
to
be
consistent
with
the
existing
development
patterns
of
the
block,
as
well
as
the
minimum
lot
requirements
for
both
the
res
6
land
use
in
the
rs
75
zoning
district
and
that's
on
page
four.
This
is
nonsense.
K
This
parcel
was
sold
and
developed
in
the
50s
as
one
lot
just
like
all
the
other
lots-
and
this
is
completely
opposite
of
the
verbiage
in
the
2012
report
that
you
have
which
says
the
proposed
lot.
Split
and
creation
of
two
lots
is
inconsistent
with
the
existing
development
pattern
of
the
surrounding
impacted
neighborhood.
This
is
frankly
just
spot.
Zoning
council
was
looking
for
legs
on
the
stool.
K
K
Experts
in
the
comp
plan
that
states
that
the
character
neighborhood
must
be
protected
and
they
will
speak
to
that
and
fourth,
the
75
frontage
foot
frontage
has
been
there
for
60
years
and
and
and
it
hasn't
been
challenged
and
it
has
no
bearing
really
it
shouldn't
have
any
bearing
on
this
particular
case.
This
is
all
competent,
substantial
evidence
that
you
should
consider.
K
K
K
K
A
A
C
Asking
for
some
additional
time
as
well:
okay,
is
it
jim
mcmahon.
N
N
The
comp
plan
recognizes
this
and
explicitly
says
there
are
six
levels
of
intensity
for
development.
South
tampa
is
level
one
in
yellow,
no
change
because
it
has
environmental
qualities
that
would
be
compromised
by
urbanization.
It
has
limited
access
to
transportation
facilities
which
would
be
inefficient
to
improve.
N
It
has
limited
opportunities
to
create
more
community
facilities,
open
spaces
or
services,
and
it
is
on
unstable
and
flood-prone
land.
That's
what
the
comp
plan
says.
This
is
from
city
attorney.
Gina
grimes
courts
have
ruled
that
it
has
never
been
the
law.
The
landowner
is
entitled
to
the
highest
and
best
use
of
his
land
and
that
the
courts
maintain
that
a
zoning
classification
is
presumed
to
be
valid.
N
Gene
duncan
pointed
to
this
map
and
told
council
that
this
is
where
tampa's
growth
must
be.
This
is
where
it
makes
sense.
This
is
where
it
is
beneficial.
It's
not
in
south
tampa
randy
goers
said
this
map
shows
a
high
intensity
of
growth
in
south
tampa.
That
is
of
great
concern.
He
pointed
to
three
planning
districts
that
have
room
for
growth
and
said
these.
N
N
My
point
is
that
we
need
more
housing,
but
it
is
foolish
to
put
it
in
south
tampa
next.
I
cannot
count
how
many
times
I
have
been
told
that
even
if
city
council
or
the
legal
department
or
city
staff
or
the
heads
of
every
department
want
to
do
something
they
cannot,
they
must
abide
by
the
language.
In
the
comp
plan.
Look
at
the
green
paper.
I
gave
you.
It
has
eight
citations
from
the
comp
plan,
which
say
you
must
deny
this
incompatible,
inconsistent
out
of
character.
N
This
is
an
extreme
loss
split
because
it
is
40
feet
smaller
than
the
required
150
feet.
It's
only
110
feet.
Additionally,
they
want
to
skip
down
two
euclidean
zoning
categories.
I've
never
seen
that
before
they're
asking
to
go
from
rs
75
pass
rs-60
down
to
rs
50,
and
they
would
need
a
comp
plan
amendment
to
change
the
land
use
too.
N
They
did
one
heck
of
a
work
around
by
using
by
asking
for
a
pd.
You
can
see,
remove
rs50
and
replace
with
pd.
Next
pd's
are
not
supposed
to
be
used
as
a
loophole
to
avoid
zoning
law.
On
your
green
sheet,
lu
policy,
1.2.28
limit
the
use
of
plan
development
rezoning
the
code
mandate,
the
code
mandated
one
thousand
three
hundred
twenty
feet.
Analysis
found
only
nine
percent
with
the
size
of
this
request.
N
Staff
also
analyzed
both
sides
of
one
block
and
found
57
percent
were
large
the
majority
they
could
not
find
a
majority
of
small
lots
until
they
analyze
one
side
of
one
block.
Legal
cases
often
refer
to
the
reasonable
person
standard.
Well,
a
reasonable
person
would
think
this
is
ridiculous,
that
a
neighborhood
is
only
one
side
of
one
block,
but
somehow,
even
though
two
of
their
three
evaluations
found
a
majority
large
lot,
staff
decided
that
those
three
small
lots
on
one
side
of
one
block
were
more
important
and
outweigh
all
the
other
data.
N
The
code
for
lot
splits
mandates
that
the
1320
feet.
That's
not,
it
must
be
used
to
determine
the
development
pattern
and
compatibility.
There
is
nothing
saying.
A
block
face
is
the
most
important
because
there
is
no
block
face
block
averaging
of
front.
Setbacks
is
in
the
code,
but
in
a
different
section,
only
for
front
setbacks
in
east
tampa
and
west
tampa
overlays.
So
it
is
completely
irrelevant
to
this.
I
understand
all
neighborhoods
aren't
the
same,
and
you
can't
always
go
13
20
feet.
They
must
get
as
close
to
that
requirement
as
possible.
N
That's
good!
Leave
it
there.
Here's
more
competence,
substantial
evidence
in
2012,
there's
an
attempted
lot
split
of
the
cattle
of
the
lot
catty
cornered
from
this
one.
That
was
the
only
other
attempt
ever
made
in
this
neighborhood
in
2012.
Abby
feely
found
it
inconsistent
with
the
pattern
of
development
and
city
council,
including
council
miranda
voted
it
down.
No
small
lot
has
been
developed
in
this
neighborhood
since
the
1950s,
but
you
don't
have
to
take
my
award
for
it.
N
You
can
listen
to
what
abby
feely
had
to
say
on
the
first,
and
I
also
want
to
point
that
on
the
first
page
of
her
report
in
the
plan
she
found
inconsistent,
they
were
asking
for
69
and
a
half
foot
lots.
That's
only
five
and
a
half
feet
short
of
what's
required.
This
is
20
and
she
said
no.
This
is
20
feet
shorter
than
the
requirement
only
55-foot
lots.
N
The
large
okay,
I
want
you
to
look
at
this
page
here.
Sorry,
let's
compare
the
data
the
largest
sample
found.
Only
nine
percent
of
the
lots
were
less
than
60
feet,
which
is
what
the
applicant
is
requesting.
30
percent
are
less
than
75
feet,
as
feely's
largest
sample
found.
38
were
less
than
75
feet,
which
is
more
than
what
they're
asking
for
today.
Yet
she
found
it
inconsistent
because
the
majority
determines
the
character
and
development
pattern
of
a
neighborhood.
N
N
I'm
going
to
read
from
her
report
block
25
contains
the
subject
property
in
two
lots
of
less
than
75
feet.
That's
only
three
blocks.
Three
lots:
three
lots.
The
structures
on
those
lots
were
constructed
in
1950
and
58,
based
on
the
existing
development
pattern
of
the
surrounding
properties.
The
majority
of
the
lots
are
conforming
to
the
existing
rs-75
and
the
creation
of
the
two
lots
on
a
pd
is
inconsistent.
N
N
The
predominant
pattern
for
the
surrounding
area
is
described
as
described
as
consistent
with
rs-75.
There
are
lots
with
less
than
75,
but
they
were
plotted
before
1987
and
1956.
They
were
not
created
through
a
rezoning
or
a
pd
persuading
to
the
net,
persuade
to
the
analysis
of
the
surrounding
areas.
The
predominant
development
pattern
of
the
surrounding
area
is
conforming
to
the
r
75,
with
lot
width
of
75
or
greater.
Therefore,
the
proposed
lot
split
in
creation
of
two
lots
is
inconsistent.
N
There
hasn't
been
any
rezoning
in
this
area
to
create
any
other
lots,
so
everything
you
saw
there
was
1950
55
and
51..
This
presents
the
first
splitting
in
this
area,
no
pds,
no
75
rs75s.
Nothing
appears
to
have
been
touched
in
that
area,
since
zoning
conformance.
The
predominant
pattern
is
consistent
with
the
existing
zoning
and
staff
found
this
request
to
be
inconsistent
with
the
existing
development
power
of
the
area.
I
seek
to
implore
the
same
standard
of
review
on
each
and
every
case
the
reds
outweighed
the
blues.
So
that's
what
I
present
to
you.
N
I
couldn't
say
it
better.
Myself
years
ago
I
had
a
dispute
with
miss
feely
about
two
lots:
they're
only
six
feet
short
of
the
requirement.
I'll
never
forget
what
you
said.
We
must
quantify
things
if
we
don't
quantify,
it
becomes
suggestive
and
we
have
chaos,
and
that
is
what
has
happened
here.
There
is
no
quantification
of
the
data.
N
R
Thank
you,
council
members.
My
name
is
peter
king.
I
am
a
resident
of
pharmacy
at
west
since
2008
the
last
14
years.
I'm
the
new
kid
on
the
block.
There's
there's
been
a
lot
of
people.
Who've
been
there
a
lot
longer
than
I
have,
but
I
have
become
very
familiar
with
the
neighborhood.
I
walk
it
daily
with
my
dog
annie.
R
We
are
very
pleased
with
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
as
it
exists
right
now,
so
I'm
here
to
speak
a
little
bit
about
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
I'm
also
going
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
my
expectancy
when
I
moved
into
the
neighborhood.
So
first
of
all
I
want
to
refer
back
to
the
lot
pattern
for
rezoning.
I'm
going
to
reiterate
a
couple
of
points.
R
R
character
of
the
neighborhood
one
of
the
things
that
drew
me
to
the
neighborhood.
When
I
was
shopping
for
property
there
in
2006
was
the
predominant
size
of
the
lots
exceeded.
You
know
65
70
75
feet.
I
like
the
larger
lots.
They
have
lots
of
trees
on
them.
There's
a
nice
canopy
of
oaks
throughout
the
neighborhood
we're
starting
to
lose
some
of
those
which
is
regrettable
and
a
lot
of
that's
because
of
the
development
that's
going
on
in
the
neighborhood,
so
we're
trying
to
retain
that
character.
R
I'm
going
to
show
you
two
things.
This
is
my
lot
here.
I
live
on
santa
bisco.
I've
got
a
hundred
by
a
hundred
lot.
I
have
four
children.
We
needed
a
little
bit
of
space
to
build
a
little
bit
bigger
house.
We
knocked
down
the
house
that
was
there.
We
built
a
3,
840
square
foot
home,
we
love
it
and
we
love
the
neighborhood.
We
love
our
neighbors.
R
R
The
tree
line
here,
all
these
birds
and
all
these
palms
back
here,
that's
on
the
fence
line,
the
edge
of
the
pool,
there's
annie
by
the
way
on
the
on
the
on
the
back
side
of
this
pool
have
about
four
feet
to
the
fence.
I
have
a
12
foot
pool
it's
not
large,
so
we
have
more
or
less
taken
a
3
800
square
foot
house
and
tried
to
really
jam
it
into
a
hundred
foot
lot.
Okay,
you
can
see
here
another
photo
from
a
different
angle.
R
We
did
obtain
an
administrative
variance
of
five
feet
on
the
santa
vispo
side
to
accommodate
our
garage,
and
so
we
were
granted
that
and
you
can
see
where
the
garage
extends
here.
We
don't
have
any
more
room
on
this
side.
It's
we
would
have
needed
a
significant
variance
to
do
more
than
that.
This
is
the
front
of
the
home.
We
have
a
25
foot
setback,
that's
code.
R
We
filled
it
up
on
the
north
side
of
the
house
over
here,
we've
got
the
seven
foot
setback,
so
we
have
used
every
available
foot
of
the
lot
to
build
a
3
840
square
foot
home
up.
This
is
the
shot
from
the
front
down.
You
know
down
the
front
so,
and
I
do
have
copies
of
these,
which
I'd
like
to
I'll
give
you
these
in
a
second.
R
So
when
we're
talking
about
character
of
the
neighborhood,
we're
talking
a
lot
about
proportionality,
about
what
the
neighborhood
looks
like
what
it
feels
like
what
we're
going
to
get
are
two
don
cesars
plopped
right
down
in
this
little
block-
and
I
I
was
very
interested
to
hear
the
petitioner,
as
well
as
the
staff
focus
your
attention
on
this
one
block
right
here.
That's
their
argument
that
it's
compatible
with
this
one
little
block
right
here.
R
What
they
don't
want
you
to
look
at
is
the
entire
lot
pattern
and
you
can
see
all
of
the
red
there's
tons
of
it
and
90.
Plus
percent
of
those
lots
are
are
not
blue,
so
we're
trying
to
avoid
more
blue
lots
because
it
detracts
from
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
It
detracts
from
the
beauty
of
the
neighborhood.
It's
going
to
result
in
fewer
trees.
It's
going
to
result
in
more
traffic.
I
heard
something
about
nine
parking
spaces
for
two
homes.
Okay,
that
seems
excessive
to
me,
but
that's
that's
their
plan.
R
So
when
I
bought
my
lot,
I
bought
it
because
I,
like
the
size
of
the
lots,
if
you
are
going
to
award
this
petition
what's
next,
where
are
we
going
next
beach
park?
Sunset
park?
Hyde
park,
grey
gables!
That's
what's
going
to
happen,
because
if
you
grant
this
one,
how
are
you
going
to
deny
the
next
one?
Thank
you.
Q
I'm
william
knuff,
I
live
in
the
4000
block
of
west
san
carlos.
My
big
concern
is
actually
you're
going
to
have
this
planned
development
of
11
000
square
foot
of
home,
multiple
driveways,
multiple
hard
surfaces,
impervious
we
in
south
tampa
and
the
city
is
very
aware
of
this-
has
forever
had
flooding.
We
are
a
low-lying
low-grade
area,
there's
nothing.
We
can
do
about
that.
Everyone
knows
basic
hydrodynamics,
the
lower
the
grade,
the
slower,
the
water
runoff,
the
higher
the
grade,
the
faster
the
water
runs
off.
There's
nothing!
We
can
do
that.
Q
Will
stop
this
from
flooding.
This
planned
development
will
give
you
all
these
hard
surfaces,
impervious
surfaces
where
nowhere
for
that
water
to
go.
This
picture
is
the
corner
of
my
house,
the
intersection
of
san
carlos
and
grady,
and
the
flooding
that
takes
place
with
just
normal
heavy
summer
rains.
Imagine
which
more
a
precedent
of
all
this
plant
development
with
less
pervious
surfaces
with
nowhere
for
the
water
to
go.
We
are
going
to
flood
south
tampa
forever.
Already
the
houses
that
are
mine
was
built
in
1954..
Q
Already.
The
houses
in
the
south
tampa
are
having
issues
with
flooding.
Whenever
we
ever
had
these
heavy
rains,
this
is
going
to
make
it
much
worse
and
exasperate
the
situation.
The
city
knows
south
tampa
floods.
You
know
the
problem.
This
plan,
development
of
11,
000
square
foot
of
housing
with
driveways
sidewalks
and
streets,
there's
no
place
for
the
water
to
go
you're
going
to
flood
us
out.
We
can't
have
this
continue.
Q
My
second
issue
is
san.
Carlos
has
no
sidewalks
the
city
at
one
time
said
oh
developers
when
they
bulldoze
the
houses
and
put
up
new
houses
they'll
put
in
sidewalks
that
hasn't
happened.
I
don't
know
why
some
of
them
have
some
of
them
haven't.
We
have
to
walk
in
the
street
in
san
carlos.
We
now
have
nine
parking
spots,
multiple
driveways,
with
additional
cars,
the
only
way
in
and
out
of
cameron,
because
the
dead
end
street
is
through
san
miguel
and
san
carlos.
All
the
kids
walk
to
school.
Q
The
city
knows
the
problem
with
kids
walking
to
the
high
school
at
plant
high.
They
had
to
put
a
stop
sign
in
a
church
in
san
carlos
just
to
stop
the
traffic
enough
for
the
children
to
safely
get
to
school.
We
need
a
safe
neighborhood.
We
need
a
non-flooding
neighborhood.
If
the
city
approves
this,
we
won't
have
this.
M
B
B
M
B
B
B
Task
force
for
for
me
or
buckhorn
in
you
all.
One
of
the
things
we
tried
to
get
in
that
report
and
did
not
achieve
was
the
concept
that
our
land
use
code
should
incent
development,
where
it
belongs
and
disincentive
where
it
does
not.
It
belongs
where
there's
roadway
capacity
where
there's
transit
or
where
there
is
plans
for
roadway
capacity
in
transit.
It
does
not.
B
Is
granting
a
density?
Credit
does
not
belong
on
in
the
area
of
primary
evacuation
routes
and
low-lying
land.
So
tonight
you've
got
these
folks
really
appealing
to
you
to
protect
the
character
of
their
neighborhood,
which
they
invested
in,
and
I'm
here
to
appeal
to
you
to
not
set
precedent
that
soon
will
be
knocking
at
my
door
on
davis
island.
Thank
you
thank.
C
K
T
Appreciate
you
all
letting
us
do
this
remotely,
mr
abarger,
could
you
please
share
with
us
your
professional
background
experience
olson.
M
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
It
states
that
the
city
should
protect
low-density,
single-family
residential
areas,
including
density
characteristics,
and
maintain
the
current
density
of
single
areas.
This
project
infringes
upon
multiple
comp
plan,
lu
policies.
Splitting
this
lot
allows
for
doubling
the
housing.
If
this
continues
to
happen,
our
low-density
single-family
residential
area
will
no
longer
be
low
density
as
it
stands
right
now.
The
plans
for
the
new
homes
are
for
two
houses
that
are
each
over
fifty
seven
hundred
five
5700
square
feet.
These
two
homes
have
at
least
four,
maybe
five
driveways
exiting
onto
the
main
road.
P
P
P
R
Good
evening,
members
of
city
council,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
this
evening.
My
name
is
alan
mason.
I
live
in
the
palmacio
west
neighborhood
when
my
wife
and
I
moved
to
the
tampa
bay
area
eight
and
a
half
years
ago
for
a
career
opportunity.
We
looked
at
homes
in
st
petersburg,
clearwater
palm
harbor,
riverview
plus
other
places
in
hillsborough,
county
and
tampa,
and
we
always
came
back
to
our
first
choice.
R
Schools
all
close
by
outstanding,
walking,
running
and
biking
neighborhoods
with
convenient
access
to
shopping,
downtown
amenities,
recreation,
the
airport
and
all
of
this
centrally
located
to
the
rest
of
the
tampa
bay
region.
That's
why
we
bought
our
new
home
in
south
tampa.
I
walk
and
run
in
our
neighborhoods
daily.
I've
been
amazed
at
the
number
of
new
homes
which
have
been
built
in
south
tampa
over
the
past
six
or
so
years.
Almost
everyone
on
an
existing
lot.
R
As
far
as
I
can
tell
continuing
at
a
rapid
pace
to
this
day
and
significantly
enhancing
property
values
and
the
tax
base,
the
president
that
has
been
set
in
south
tampa
seems
to
be
successful.
So
why
change
what's
working
and
why
do
it?
By
setting
a
new
precedent
that
will
surely
lead
to
more
requests
to
split
lots
in
the
future?
Why
risk
changing
the
character
of
our
neighborhoods,
potentially
cutting
down
trees,
increasing
traffic
overloading
existing
schools,
changing
the
density,
identity
and
livability
of
neighborhoods
that
fit
the
existing
tampa
comp
plan?
R
R
R
P
My
name
is
ivy
gustafson
and
my
children
and
I
live
at
4108
west
san
carlo
street
directly
across
the
street.
The
lot
that's
being
discussed
tonight.
We
have
lived
on
san
carlos
for
approximately
five
years,
but
my
family
and
I
have
been
a
member
of
the
tampa
community
for
over
a
hundred
years.
My
great-grandfather
was
a
reader
in
the
ybor
city
factories
and
my
grandparents
settled
in
beach
park
and
palmisia
in
the
early
1940s.
P
I
am
here
today
to
defend
the
current
zoning
at
west
san
carlos.
As
someone
who
spent
almost
my
entire
life
in
south
tampa
the
petition
to
divide
this
lot
greatly
concerns
me.
My
children
were
born
in
the
dc
area,
and
my
decision
to
return
home
to
tampa
was
based
entirely
on
my
desire
to
raise
my
children
in
south
tampa
the
urban
density
of
the
dc
area
and
the
traffic
congestion
and
resulting
concrete
and
safety
issues
that
come
with.
That
was
something
I
decidedly
did
not
want
for
them.
P
South
tampa's,
current
zoning
in
larger
lots,
provide
an
abundance
of
green
space
and
shade
safe
walkable,
neighborhoods,
free
of
traffic
and
congestion,
and
a
true,
suburban
feel.
Dividing
this
lot
will
destroy
a
long-established
integrity
of
our
neighborhood
and
the
planning
that
has
been
upheld
since
the
neighborhood
was
established
more
than
60
years
ago,
by
allowing
almost
12
000
square
feet
of
living
space
to
be
built
on
a
lot
that
was
never
intended
and
never
zoned
for
such
aggressive
development,
unprecedented
and
unwanted
density
will
certainly
be
brought
to
pomaceou
west.
P
P
One
of
the
central
reasons
I
moved
to
palmacio
west
was
the
fact
that
the
water
mitigation
was
more
favorable
than
it
was
in
south
sunset
park,
where
I
previously
lived.
Even
still,
I
have
invested
thousands
of
dollars
into
my
current
home
to
mitigate
flooding
issues
and
still
have
additional
work
to
do
the
proposed
lot.
Division
in
building
plans
will
permanently
cover
land
that
is
desperately
needed
for
water
absorption
and
those
that
will
be
most
affected
by
this
man-made
runoff
are
the
neighbors,
those
with
newer,
builds
and
older
homes.
P
Our
neighbors
were
developed
almost
100
years
ago
to
establish
and
maintain
an
identity,
a
suburban
oasis
of
single-family
homes,
full
of
green
spaces
and
trees,
where
neighbors
can
share
coffee
in
conversation
while
they
walk
their
dogs
and
watch
their
children
play.
We
know
that
tampa's
population
is
increasing
daily
and
it
is
the
devotee
of
our
community
and
the
officials
that
we
elect
to
preserve
for
future
generations,
our
neighborhoods
that
those
before
us
invested
so
much
to
create.
I
strongly
urge
you
to
vote
against
this
proposed
rezoning.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
P
P
I'll
start
again,
I've
lived
in
palm
sea
west
for
47
years,
and
I've
been
active
in
the
neighborhood
association
delivering
newsletters
notices,
walking
the
neighborhood
for
all
of
those
years.
I'm
an
expert
on
the
character
of
our
neighborhood
and
on
all
these
years,
we've
never
had
a
rezoning
to
divide
a
parcel
approved.
P
I
also
attended
the
first
hearing
of
this
request
on
june
9th
and
I
want
to
thank
councilman
manuscalco
for
taking
the
time
to
look
at
the
city,
codes
and
policies
on
the
paper
in
front
of
you
in
order
to
make
his
informed
decision
to
deny
this
request
for
rezoning
and
he
was
seconded
by
councilman
carlson.
Thank
you,
gentlemen.
P
Those
codes
require
that
the
complete
character
of
a
neighborhood
be
considered
before
rezoning
is
granted.
That
character
is
determined
by
going
out
1
320
feet
into
the
neighborhood,
not
just
by
looking
at
the
subject
block.
Hence
the
block
colored
map
generated
by
the
city
planning
and
development
department.
P
City
staff's
transcript
shows
that
mr
hussein
even
kind
of
sloughed
through
a
look
at
the
map
and
told
you
all
that
here
you
see
red,
blue,
yellow
and
you
see
how
it's
all
compatible
and
it
didn't
delineate
the
difference.
As
we've
been
trying
to
tell
you
that,
there's
only
a
small
percentage
that
are
the
blue
lots.
The
rest
are
all
larger.
P
Okay,
and
am
I
allowed
to
ask
council
a
question?
P
P
There
were
also
some
comments
made
from
the
petitioner
that
this
lot
split
is
the
same
as
the
two
lots
it
backs
up
to.
They
are
not
the
same.
Those
lots
were
grandfathered
in
when
the
75-foot
zoning
went
in.
One
has
been
in
the
same
family
for
three
generations
and
now
has
a
new
house
on
it.
But
it
is
not
five
thousand
six
hundred
seventy
square
feet,
nor
does
it
have
two
double
driveways
and
a
circle
driveway
same
with
the
house.
P
P
The
original
platted
lots
the
map,
that's
on
the
second
page
of
the
revised
form
from
the
city
planners
shouldn't
even
be
considered
here.
It's
not
it's
it's
from
100
years
ago,
and
it's
not
the
way
the
lots
are
being
used
now.
The
color
map
tells
you
how
the
lots
are
being
used.
Now
we
also
have
concerns
for
flooding.
We
do
not
have
curbs
water
collects
and
sits.
Some
of
the
outflows
are
not
where
the
water
runs.
As
ivy
told
you,
she
spent
a
lot
of
money
at
her
house.
P
My
family
has
spent
thousands
of
dollars
on
a
mitigation,
since
we
are
the
low
yard
for
three
blocks
around
us,
decreasing
the
percolating
ground.
By
dividing
this
lot
will
cause
more
flooding,
we're
not
opposed
to
a
new
build
on
this
property,
but
two
large
houses
on
two
smaller
lots
will
cause
undue
hardship
with
regard
to
flooding,
increased
traffic,
more
driveways
and
a
feeling
of
density.
That
is
not
in
character.
P
Please
again,
excuse
me
refer
to
the
level
one,
no
significant
change
on
the
comp
plan.
That's
us!
That's
south!
Tampa
a
letter
from
the
builder
said
this
is
to
be
developed
as
a
family.
Multi-Generational
homestead,
squeezing
two
houses
into
one
lot
to
make
a
family
compound
is
not
compatible
in
our
neighborhood.
P
P
Good
evening
I'm
kathy
dufer.
I
live
in
palmacilla
west
for
16
years
in
south
tampa
for
22
years.
We
are,
we
are
a
retired
military
family.
We
have
lived
all
over
the
world.
We
chose
to
live
in
south
tampa
in
I'm
very
familiar
with
my
neighborhood.
As
I
walk
it
every
day,
I've
seen
a
lot
of
changes.
P
P
P
We
have
the
right
to
expect
and
to
preserve
the
neighborhood
that
we
chose
to
live
in
older
homes
are
now
being
torn
down,
they're
being
replaced
by
bigger
homes.
On
their
original
lot,
it
is
important
for
you
to
know
the
lots
that
are
smaller
than
75.
Feet
are
grandfathered
in
because
they
were
bought
and
built
in
the
50s
before
the
75
foot
zoning
there
are
very
few
of
them.
P
P
C
L
Good
evening
my
name
is
nelson
bosque,
I'm
a
resident
of
palm
ceo
west,
the
registered
owner
of
411
west
san
carlo
street
lives
around
the
corner
from
the
subject.
Property
here
he's
owned
property
in
this
neighborhood.
Since
the
1990s
he's
well
aware
that
the
lot
was
that
palmacio
west
consists
of
larger
lots,
they
are
not
being
denied
any
rights
that
they're
entitled
to.
They
are
asking
for
a
special
favor,
an
exception
to
the
rules
that
have
existed
for
for
the
past
66
years.
L
They
are
seeking
rezoning
of
this
lot
for
financial
reasons
and
not
in
the
best
interest
of
our
neighborhood.
Ever
since
I
moved
into
the
neighborhood
the
house
that
was
on
that
lot
was
in
disrepair.
I
am
talking
overgrown
landscaping.
Boarded
up
windows
abandoned
cars
on
the
property
debris
in
the
front,
porch
window
ac
units,
because
the
apparent
central
ac
system
was
not
working.
I
say
this
because
the
owner
had
no
other
choice
but
to
level
the
house
that
was
on
their
lot
because
it
was
beyond.
It
was
possibly
inhabitable.
L
L
That
would
mean
that
over
90
percent
of
the
lots
have
a
frontage
of
over
55
feet.
While
I
have
not
studied
the
entire
palmacio
west
area,
I
believe
the
percentages
of
lots,
55
feet
or
under
would
be
significantly
less
in
the
entire
homeowners
area.
The
character
of
our
neighborhood
is
overwhelmingly
big
lots
with
lots
of
green
space
and
mature
shady
trees,
caddy
corner
to
the
subject.
Property
is
4202
saint
carlos.
This
lot
is
actually
bigger
than
the
subject
lot:
measuring
113
by
139
versus
the
subject:
lot
measuring
110
by
139
10
years
ago.
L
L
It
is
my
understanding
from
contractors
that
I
know
that
the
city
of
tampa
has
been
denying
some
permits
due
to
drainage
issues,
particularly
in
south
tampa.
Keeping
green
space
is
important
to
south
tampa
due
to
flooding
placing
two
homes
with
a
total
of
four
double
driveways
on
this
one
lot
will
significantly
decrease
the
amount
of
green
space.
This
lot
has
and
as
it
was
designed
in
the
1960s.
L
L
I
am
active
in
the
parent-teacher
organizations
as
well
as
other
boards
of
those
schools
and
can
tell
you
that
at
plant,
for
example,
students
that
arrive
a
few
minutes
after
the
bell
rings
are
not
considered
tardy
due
to
the
fact
that
teachers
and
administrators
understand
it
is
impossible
to
navigate
the
halls
at
plant.
A
portion
of
the
library
is
closed
during
lunch
to
accommodate
students,
so
they
can
eat
the
cafeteria
is
unable
to
accommodate
the
different
lunches.
L
The
lot
that
is
being
considered
to
be
built
already
comes
with
a
15
foot
easement,
because
it
is
a
corner
lot.
Splitting
the
slot
will
undoubtedly
cause
an
obstruction
to
the
cars
going
north
on
cameron.
There
was
a
sketch
that
was
brought
up
here
that
showed
a
giant
circular
driveway.
Clearly,
cars
will
have
to
be
parked
there
because
of
the
size
of
this
house.
This
house
is
not
going
to
have
a
backyard,
which
means
landscaping.
L
Children
playing
anything
that
you
would
traditionally
do
in
a
backyard
is
going
to
be
have
to
be
done
in
the
front
yard
again
as
you're
driving
north
or
south
on
cameron.
It's
going
to
be
impossible
to
see
onto
saint
carlos
as
a
resident
and
real
estate
professional
that
lives
and
works
in
palmisio
west.
I
am
asking
for
this
board
to
please
deny
this
request.
L
L
I
have
been
selling
real
estate
in
tampa
for
almost
20
years
and
can
tell
you
that
buyers
are
attracted
to
promisio
west
because
of
the
size
of
the
lots.
This
block,
this
block
of
a
few
homes
on
cameron
street
is
not
descriptive
of
what
palmisio
west
is
just
recently,
I
reviewed
an
appraiser's
review
of
a
property
on
that
same
street
and
the
appraiser
noted
their
lot,
as
quote
legal
non-conforming
grandfathered
use
because
it
does
not
conform
with
the
neighborhood.
L
L
F
F
The
larger
lots
offer
more
space
to
enjoy
for
kids
and
adults
alike.
When
I
bought
in
this
neighborhood,
I
know
intentions
of
attempting
to
change
any
legal
zoning
regulations.
I
understood
what
I
had
and
the
protections
it
offered
to
the
neighborhood.
That
is,
the
benefit
of
legal
zoning
and
property
rights.
F
F
Allowing
this
property
to
be
divided
will
also
increase
density
to
the
neighborhood
and
set
improper
course
for
the
future.
The
south
tampa
area
has
been
undated
with
additional
condos,
larger
homes,
multi-family
homes
in
certain
neighborhoods,
all
adding
to
the
problems
that
come
with
this
unmanaged
growth
of
increased
traffic,
stress,
increased
infrastructure
costs,
crime
and
a
lesser
quality
of
life.
F
Allowing
more
homes
will
also
reduce
environmental
benefits
by
decreasing
green
space
for
proper
drainage
in
an
area
that
already
is
prone
to
frequent
flooding
and
nothing.
The
city
has
done
with
the
taxation
for
stormwater.
Improvement
has
improved
the
flooding
problem
in
south
tampa
and
with
this
continued
expansion,
the
flooding
situation
in
south
tampa
will
never
be
remedied.
F
F
There
is
also
the
issue
of
evacuations
during
the
crisis.
The
residents
you
pack
into
one
area,
the
more
difficult
would
be
to
evacuate.
This
neighborhood
already
has
proper
zoning
rags.
Everyone
that
bought
here
knew
what
they
were
buying.
It
is
not
up
to
someone
to
change
our
neighborhood
zoning
just
for
safe,
increasing
the
profit
and
throwing
out
the
window,
the
wonderful
characteristics
that
exist
to
protect
the
quality
of
this
neighborhood.
We
urge
you
to
maintain
the
standards
that
exist
to
maintain
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
and
for
the
quality
of
life
that
it
provides.
F
N
D
N
Lori
mcmahon,
I
have
lived
at
my
present
address
for
35
years,
which
is
the
adjacent
property
and
would
be
the
proposed
seven
foot
side
of
the
rezoning.
I
love
my
neighborhood
and
I
love
my
yard.
I
enjoy
the
outdoors,
especially
my
neighborhood,
along
with
my
backyard,
I
would
like
to
reference
charlie
miranda.
N
N
I
oppose
the
rezoning
for
the
411
san
carlos
due
to
the
fact
this
will
change
the
characteristic
of
the
neighborhood.
Specifically,
it
will
give
the
feeling
of
just
another
concrete
jungle
or
city
in
anywhere
usa.
The
feeling
of
belonging
to
the
city
of
tampa
will
be
eroded
and
lost.
I
would
like
to
share
with
you
my
backyard.
You
got
a
sneak
preview.
N
There
has
been
a
lot
of
sweat
equity
put
into
this
backyard.
When
there
is
a
structure,
seven
feet
away,
it
will
no
longer
be
the
tranquil
peaceful.
Relaxing
backyard
it
is
now
I
choose
to
make
my
home
here.
I
chose
to
make
my
home
here
35
years
ago,
because
it
is
a
quiet
neighborhood.
I
did
not
choose
to
live
downtown
where
people
are
elbow
to
elbow.
I
chose
to
live
in
this
neighborhood
for
the
characteristic
of
the
space.
I
did
not
choose
to
live
in
a
cement
jungle.
N
N
N
My
street
cameron
is
a
dead
end
street
and
the
proposed
homes
have
parking
for
nine
cars.
Presently,
my
block
has
six
cars
that
would
be
150
percent
increase
in
cars
at
a
minimum,
along
with
the
cars,
the
driveways
of
concrete,
limited,
green
space,
the
drainage
will
change
not
in
a
positive
manner,
that's
common
sense.
N
In
summary,
let's
go
back
to
mr
miranda
and
what
he
said
about
tampa's.
Success
is
based
on
residents
feeling
they
belong.
If
you
approve
this
zoning
request,
the
feeling
of
belonging
to
the
city
of
tampa
will
be
eroded
and
lost.
A
concrete
jungle
does
not
fit.
This
neighborhood
be
honest
with
yourself
walk
in
the
shoes
of
the
residents
and
please
deny
the
zoning
request.
I
No
just
as
a
matter
of
procedure
ali
is
the
son
of
the
owner,
and
I
just
want
to
confirm
with
council.
If
you
want
them
to
speak
with
that
rebuttal
or
separately
with
the
public.
C
I
I
I
think
I
I
won't
need
to
speak
that
long,
so
I
think
that
that
makes
the
most
sense.
So
is
there
if.
C
B
D
B
B
I
know
firsthand
the
issue.
Students
and
teachers
face
with
overcrowded
schools
when
classroom
sizes
increase
teachers
aren't
able
to
give
one-on-one
or
small
group
instruction
on
a
regular
basis,
which
causes
many
struggling
students
to
fall
even
further.
Behind
overcrowded
classrooms
and
hallways
packed
with
students
provide
more
opportunities
for
conflicts.
Tension
and
disruptive
behavior
leads
to
less
access
to
school
equipment
and
technology,
because
there
is
not
enough
room
for
specialties,
such
as
science,
labs
and
computer
labs.
B
B
B
When
there
are
more
students
in
the
classroom,
the
increased
noise
level
makes
it
harder
for
students
for
teachers
to
teach
and
for
students
to
concentrate
think
of
all
the
valuable
teaching
time
that
is
wasted
and
lessons
that
are
missed.
While
teachers
are
busy
focusing
on
classroom
management
and
noise
control,
the
stress
and
frustration
that
overcrowding
puts
in
our
teachers
leads
to
teacher
burnout
and
many
excellent
teachers
end
up
leaving
the
profession.
It
is
not.
It
is
not
worth
the
stress
they
deal
with
on
a
daily
basis.
B
A
L
L
Showed
that
90
of
homes
had
been
developed
with
a
width
of
60
foot
or
greater.
This
should
carry
the
most
weight
and
significance
of
determining
the
pattern
to
develop.
It
is
required
by
section
2711,
to
quote
review
the
development
pattern
for
a
radius
of
1320
foot
enclosed.
Nothing
else
is
required
by
code,
not
the
subject
block
or
the
block
face.
Therefore,.
L
B
L
And
well-designed
developments
that
are
characterized
by
unique
conditions
or
situations
with
other
zoning
districts
cannot
accommodate,
including,
but
specifically,
not
limited
to
unusual
physical
environmental
features,
transportation
access,
none
of
those
exist.
In
this
case,
this
request
is
so
extreme.
They
would
have
to
have
a
cop
plan
amendment
to
change
the
land
use
to
r10,
because
you
cannot
have
an
rs-50
zoning
in
an
r6
area.
C
L
They
get
around
this,
they
switch
to
a
pd.
They
asked
for
the
rezoning
originally
from
rs
75
to
rs
50
and
were
told
to
put
it
in
as
a
pd
they're
asking
for
one
heck
of
a
workaround.
This
is
not
what
a
pd
is
for.
They
are
not
supposed
to
be
used
as
a
backdoor
way
to
slide
around
zoning
requirements.
This
pd
is
hiding
how
extreme
the
watch
fit.
B
E
Q
E
Q
Q
Q
A
lot
of
the
information,
14
12
000
square
foot
homes
on
a
small
lot,
and
I
just
I
just
hope
you
deny
this.
That's
all
I
have
to
say
thank
you.
E
I
I
Speaking
to
mrs
feely's
statements
that
were
made
in
person
in
that
meeting,
those
are
hearsay
statements
and
the
prior
reports
for
a
different
application,
and-
and
it
didn't
consider
this
block
the
the
larger
lot
pattern
that
many
of
the
constituents
up
here
spoke
of
was
analyzed
by
staff.
It's
in
the
staffs
report
and
staff
was
swayed
to
find
this
consistent
compatible
after
reviewing
that
larger
area.
As
the
code
requires
it,
the
the
procedure
chosen
doesn't
upend
compatibility.
I
This
is
the
same
same
type
of
use
of
same
density
in
the
rs6
category.
I
Additionally,
these
these
homes
are
closer
to
4,
000
square
foot,
heated,
not
the
size
that
have
been
stated
and
they're
built
to
the
rs
75
setbacks
with
approval
from
the
stormwater
department
here
so
they're
building
within
the
requirements
of
that
surrounding
zoning
area.
I
The
public
mentioned
a
number
of
facts
and
discussed
a
lot
of
facts
and
brought
up
various
parts
of
the
code,
but
these
are
all
things
that
were
considered
by
staff.
The
larger
area
was
considered
by
staff
and
staff,
as
well
as
his
council
at
the
prior
hearing
was
swayed
by
the
development
pattern
in
the
more
immediate
area.
I
Additionally,
and
just
very
briefly
here,
the
staff
talked
to
sorry.
The
constituents
talked
a
great
deal
about
the
20s
section
27-11
talking
about
not
splitting
lots.
Well,
what
that
prevents
is
patently
inconsistent.
I
Section
2711
discusses
denying
when
lots
are
patently
inconsistent,
which
is
not
the
case
here
and
discusses
analysis
to
determine
compatibility
which
professional
staff
already
did.
Additionally,
part
of
the
requirements
is
to
review
the
original,
plat
and
subdivision
documents,
which
is
what's
proposed
here
and
I'd
like
to
I'll
leave
to
speak
and
then,
if
there's
time,
the
design
professional.
E
20
years
of
my
life
since
then
my
siblings
and
I
went
our
you
know,
we.
S
Grew
up.
We
went
to
the
public
schools
in
the
area,
then
to
usf.
I
went
and
worked
in
saint
petersburg
and
my
sisters
are
now
in
dental
school
at
nyu.
This
home
will
be
not
this
home
is
not
a
money
grab.
It's
for
us
to
come
back
to
the
community
that
we
love
that
we
grew
up
in
and
be
surrounded
by
family.
Thank
you.
B
Good
evening,
council,
travis
hills
just
hope
that
you
can
bear
with
me
just
for
a
few
minutes.
I
don't
want
to
take
a
lot
of
time,
but
right,
I
see
the
clock,
but
I
just
wanted
to
ask
if
I
go
a
little
over
you
give
me
a
moment.
B
So
that
means
that
the
square
footage
is
stacked.
So
when
you
talk
about
when
it
comes
to
drainage,
it's
all
about
the
footprint
not
about
the
square
footage.
That's
on
the
second
floor,
so
somebody
some
of
these
homes
that
people
do
are
split
levels
where
it's
not
necessarily
stacked
square
footage.
You
know
traditional
one
over
one
outer
perimeter.
B
Well,
this
is
why
that
was
done.
In
that
case,
the
other
thing
is
with
the
driveways
I
hear.
Sometimes
people
talk
about
it
as
two
homes,
but
then
they'll
use
statistics
as
this
one
development,
nine
parking
spaces.
Well,
every
house
that
has
a
two-car
garage
and
driveway
in
front
of
it
has
four
parking
spaces.
B
That's
so
that's
probably
almost
everybody
in
here
so
we're
talking,
one
additional,
which
is
the
circular
that
makes
up
30
seconds
more
okay,
thank
you
that
makes
up
that
additional
one
space
that
is
out
of
the
norm
now
back
to
the
property
adjacent
on
the
back,
those
that
house
does
the
same
thing.
They
got
two
in
the
front
and
they
got
a
detached
in
the
back
with
front
able
to
access
on
both
sides,
yeah
well
yeah,
but
once
again
it
all
falls
within
the
setback
requirements.
A
M
T
G
In
neighborhoods
and
neighbors
is
keeping
that
continuity,
but
when
I
look
at
the
map-
and
I
count
and
when
I
look
at
this
other
gentleman
who
brought
this
map
here,
he
laid
out
162
78
and
I
see
on
this
map
that
the
audience
brought
to
me.
I
see
113,
I
see
110
110,
110
103,
you
know,
and
then
I
look
at
some
of
the
other
sections
of
this
map.
100
100,
108
104,
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
how
is
this
not
compatible?
H
Yes,
sir
zane
is
saying
development
coordination.
It's
a
great
point
when
staff
was
analyzing
this,
as
I
showed
you're
looking
at
the
block
here,
and
also
from
the
block
face
from
south
cameron
avenue.
As
you
see,
those
lots
to
the
north
and
also
to
the
east
you'll
see
that
compatibility
what
the
applicant
is
proposing,
so
it
would
be
overall
compatible
and
different
parts.
Different
stages
of
our
staff
has
analyzed
it.
Different
departments
have
looked
at
it
and
it
was
overall
found
consistent.
G
H
Correct
this
is
this
map
is
provided
from
us
to
us
by
the
mapping
department
for
the
city
of
tampa,
so
they
provided
the
numbers,
they
have
the
gis
software.
They
provide
the
compatibility
and
the
conforming
map
for
staff
to
analyze,
so
their
numbers
are
correct.
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank
you
guys
for.
J
I'm
gonna
stick
with
this
whole
map
scenario,
because
what
I
did
is,
while
listening
to
the
citizens
and
saying
that
this
lot
conforms
to
the
rest
of
it.
Well,
I
counted
and
there's
only
11
lots
in
this
entire
area
that
are
110
or
wider.
J
A
the
block
face
fits
and
then
b.
There
are
so
few
lots
that
are
this
size
that
I
I
I
don't
see
the
I
don't
see
their
argument
here,
but
I
also
wanted
to
ask
you
how,
if
you
are
going
to
if
this
lot
is
technically
divided
into
two,
how
much
square
footage
would
be
in
each
lot.
I
believe
you
showed
us
a
slide
about
that
or
a
page.
It
was
75,
something
or
other.
H
Yes,
the
applicant
is
proposing
both
the
lots
to
be
55
by
139
and.
J
H
J
Thousand
six
hundred
and
forty
five,
so
my
understanding
of
75
the
75
zoning
is
that
one
of
the
requirements
is
that
it's
7
500
square
feet.
Am
I
correct
in
that
correct?
So,
basically,
the
only
thing
that
doesn't
fit
is
the
frontage.
M
C
Before
we
close,
my
name
is
mitchen
a
couple
of
times
determined.
If
I
may-
and
sometimes
it's
well
said.
Sometimes
it's
not
well
said.
However,
when
I
looked
at
this
map-
and
I
looked
at
the
blue
and
I
looked
at
the
110
and
I
looked
at-
I
was
in
my
mind
thinking
it's
got
a
pass.
It's
got
this
within
reason
and
then,
when
I
voted,
I
said
to
myself:
yeah,
that's
fine.
I
did
the
right
thing.
C
H
They
could
meet
the
requirements
with
one
house.
J
I
also
adopt
the
findings
and
reasonings
of
the
planning,
commission
and
city
staff
reports,
particularly,
I
state
the
findings
of
fact,
based
on
competent
and
substantial
evidence
found
in
staff
reports,
applicant
reports,
testimony
etc
that
establish
compliance
with
applicable
goals,
objectives
and
policy
in
the
comprehensive
plan.
As
such,
as
noted
in
the
planning
commission
report,
the
existing
density
along
west
carlos
street
is
4.56.
J
Development
per
acre
and
is
4.51
along
south
cameron.
The
request
for
the
proposed
density
of
5.71
is
slightly
greater
than
the
existing
density
and
will
allow
for
compatible
development
within
an
area
that
is
planned
for
a
development
pattern
of
up
to
six
dwelling
units,
an
acre,
consistent
with
land
use
policies.
Nine
point
three
point:
eight
nine
point,
five
point:
one
and
nine
point
five
point:
three:
the
proposed
rezoning
is
consistent
with
land
use
policy.
Nine
point
two
point:
one
and
housing
policy.
J
Also
in
compliance
with
the
land
development
code,
section
24-136,
the
proposed
development,
as
shown
on
the
site
plan,
promotes
or
encourages
development
that
is
appropriate
in
location,
character
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
The
city
staff
report
establishes
that
the
proposed
reduction
in
lot
with
re-establishes
the
platted
lots
and
will
result
in
a
development
pattern
consistent
with
the
remainder
of
the
block
face
and
that
the
proposed
development
seeks
no
waivers.
J
Although
the
lot
widths
will
each
be
55
feet,
the
overall
lot
area
for
each
resulting
lot
exceeds
the
minimum
required
for
the
rs-75
zoning
district.
J
Oh
and
sorry,
an
ordinance
resulting
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
411
west
san
carlo
street
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
rs
75,
residential
single
family
to
pd,
planned
development,
residential
single
family
detached
providing
an
effective
date.
Second,.
A
A
A
A
We
are
asked
to
take
a
five-minute
break.
B
B
B
B
B
A
D
Good
afternoon
people
keon
henderson
city
of
tampa
housing,
community
development
division
manager-
I
am
not
in
the
office
today,
so
michelle
boone,
who
is
immune
to
the
team,
will
be
given
the
presentation.
Today
she
is
the
housing
community.
Development
supervisor
excuse.
C
A
D
O
Good
evening
we
should
have
a
brief
presentation.
Can
I
bring
that
up,
please,
like
keon,
said,
and
we've
been
talking
about
housing
and
affordability
and
housing
programs
all
day.
A
O
S
O
The
american
rescue
plan
program
provided
by
the
department
of
housing
and
urban
development
6.3
million
dollars.
The
purpose
of
the
grant
is
to
provide
homeless
assistance
and
supportive
services
through
eligible
activities
such
as
acquisition,
development
of
non-condor
sheltering
tenant-based,
rental
assistance,
supportive
services
and
rental
housing
development.
O
O
Again,
these
are
our
strategic
plan
and
goals,
also
itemized.
In
the
plan.
A
plan
is
to
develop
new
construction
of
rentable
housing
units
or
rental
housing,
rehab,
supportive
housing
operations
of
those
rental
units,
tenant-based
rental
assistance,
homeless
assistance
services
and,
of
course,
planning
and
development
for
the
staff
to
run
the
programs.
O
This
is
our
calendar.
The
draft
plan
was
available
on
our
website.
As
of
around
may
1st,
it
is
there
now
for
public.
Viewing
today
is
our
first
public
hearing,
which
is
required
by
hud.
Our
second
public
hearing
will
be
scheduled
august
25th,
where
we
will
present
the
full
plan
and
then
submit
it
to
hud.
After
that,.
O
Is
there
any
anyone
here
to
speak
on
the
item.
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Councilman
madison,.
E
O
This
is,
in
addition
to
the
miss
feely
presented,
a
plan
of
13
million
dollars
with
our
hud
and
state
dollars.
This
is
in
addition
to
those
funds,
which
is
also,
in
addition
to
the
5.5
million
dollars
and.
E
O
Those
that
are
facing
homelessness
or
housing
and
security.
E
E
J
And
and
that
it
just
goes
back
to
my
question
for
miss
travis
earlier,
if
we
could
get
a
breakdown
of
rental-
and
I
I
know
you're,
you
can
talk
to
us
about
me
about
that.
But
it
sounds
like
the
rest
of
us
have
questions
too.
So
if
there's
a
way
that
maybe
you
could
do
a
presentation
to
all
of
us
instead
of
just
talking
to
me,
oh
absolutely,.
N
What
I'm
going
to
do
is
do
the
breakdown
just
like
you
asked
and
show
all
the
different
buckets,
and
I'm
going
to
send
that
to
all
of
you
ahead
of
time
before
any
council
meeting
keon
already
she
heard
it
this
morning.
They
already
started
working
on
it
and
then
we
can
meet
individually
and
I
can
come
back
and
do
a
public
presence.
A
J
A
H
Please
proceed.
Thank
you
good
evening,
thomas
with
your
planning
commission
staff.
This
is
tacpa
2204
regarding
cemetery
policies,
some
background
on
this.
It
was
publicly
initiated
and
it
was
transmitted
to
the
department
of
economic
opportunity
on
june.
6.
deo
had
no
comment.
H
An
overview
of
the
proposed
changes
include
two
new
definitions:
13
new
or
modified
goals,
objectives
and
policies,
and
then
cemeteries
is
being
added
to
the
description
of
public
semi.
Public
and
city-owned
cemeteries
is
being
added
to
the
description
of
recreational
open
space.
Future
land
use,
designation.
H
Plan,
commission
staff
has
reviewed
the
requested
changes
and
found
it
consistent
with
multiple
aspects
of
the
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
The
residents
of
tampa
have
clearly
expressed
cemeteries,
have
a
substantial
cultural
value
to
the
community
and,
as
such,
the
comprehensive
plan
direct
staff
to
take
steps
to
honor
the
cultural
values.
H
Adding
cemeteries
to
the
description
of
the
recreational
open
space
designation
clarifies
that
it
is
an
appropriate
future
land
use
designation
for
cemeteries
and
is
supported
by
ros
policy
1.1.12,
which
encourages
the
dedication
of
properties
for
recreational
use.
Additionally,
recognizing
cemeteries
under
the
recreational
open
space
designation
is
consistent
with
existing
comprehensive
plan
policy
that
provides
for
protections
for
parklands.
H
T
A
G
Or
has
been
presented
for
freshman
consideration,
orders
amending
the
imagine,
2040
temple
college
of
plan,
future
land
use
element
to
create
new
definition
for
cemetery
and
unmarked
human
burial
and
to
amend
land
use,
lu
gold
19
and
create
lu
policies,
19.5
19.5.1,
19.5.2,
19.5.3,
four,
nineteen,
five,
four,
five.
Nineteen
point:
six.
Nineteen
point:
six
point:
six,
one:
nineteen
point,
six
point:
six:
two:
nineteen
point:
seven
and
nineteen
point
seven
point:
seven:
one:
providing
for
pre-award
orders
and
conflict
providers;
they're
really
providing
an
effective
date.
S
A
A
T
Good
evening
council,
this
is
danny
collins,
with
your
planning,
commission
staff
I'll
be
presenting
tacpa
2207..
It's
a
tech's
amendment
to
the
comprehensive
plan
relating
to
the
utilities,
utilization
of
four
air
ratio
for
residential
development
and
the
rmu
100
future
land
use
designation.
You
heard
this
amendment
at
your
hearing
on
may
26th.
T
Just
a
quick
background.
This
was
publicly
initiated
by
tampa
city
council.
This
is
the
same
language
that
or
this
is
the
same.
This
amendment
has
the
same
intent
of
tacpa
2111,
which
was
an
amendment
that
limited
the
use
of
far
for
single-use
multi-family
residential
projects
in
the
cc-35
cme
35
and
umu-60
land
use
designations
within
the
south
tampa
and
north
tampa
planning
districts.
T
T
The
planet,
commission
staff
reviewed
their
request
and
found
it
consistent
with
several
policies
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
The
the
request
would
support
it
or
the
request
supported
policies,
the
that
dealt
with
the
preservation,
neighborhood
character
and
design
sensibility.
T
T
The
planet
commission
reviewed
this
request
at
their
hearing
on
may
9th
and
found
it
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
imagine
2040
tampa
conference
of
plan.
This
concludes
my
presentation
available
for
any
questions.
J
Ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading
consideration
an
ordinance
amending
the
imagine
24
to
40
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
Future
land
use
element
to
modify
the
use
of
floor
area
ratio
far
for
single-use
residential
development
located
within
the
regional
mixed
use.
100
rmu
100
category
within
the
south
tampa
and
new
tampa
planning
districts
providing
for
a
repeal
of
all
ordinances
and
conflict,
providing
for
several
ability
providing
an
effective
date.
A
A
C
A
A
A
A
All
right
again
for
those
who
have
just
walked
in
agenda
items
number
12,
13
and
14
have
been
moved
up
in
our
agenda.
A
D
Thank
you,
chairman
and
council
of
sean
dock
development
coordination
council,
I'd
like
to
ask
that
items.
12,
13
and
14
be
opened
together.
A
Have
a
motion
made
by
councilman
miranda
seconded
by
councilman
goodes
that
items
agenda
items,
12,
13
and
14
be
opened
at
the
same
time,
all
in
favor
say
aye.
Is
there
any
opposed?
Thank
you
and.
D
As
council
hears
these
cases
and
votes,
we
would
need
to
vote
on
12,
first
13
and
then
14
in
that
order.
Thank
you
so
much
thank.
B
As
you
can
see,
it's
file
number
vac
22-03,
the
applicants,
graham
terrell,
and
it's
located
in
the
general
vicinity
of
920
communion
court.
B
This
application
was
filed
with
the
city
of
tampa
on
november
16
to
2021
the
applicant
owns
property
south
of
proposed
third
street
vacating
and
north
of
mississippi
avenue
proposed
vacating
the
applicant's
reason
for
the
application.
The
right-of-ways
will
be
included
as
part
of
the
master
redevelopment
that
seeks
to
restore
the
grid
within
your
city.
B
B
B
B
B
Recommendations
for
this
vacation
request,
the
staff
objects
to
this
vacant
request
based
upon
responses
received
from
transportation
planning
and
traffic
design.
Easement
reservations
include
transportation,
stormwater,
tico
and
tico
people's
gas.
Some
special
conditions
with
this
vacant
request
is
florida
department
of
transportation.
B
An
easement
agreement
is
needed
within
the
first
180
days
of
the
letter
that
was
received
by
the
applicant
on
august
1st
of
2000.
I
don't
know
why
I
says
2018
but
2022
for
a
portion
of
mississippi
avenue
in
the
proposed
vacating,
so
the
south
portions
of
mississippi
avenue,
that's
where
the
fdlt
is
needing
that
easement
agreement.
D
Lashawn
dock
development
coordination
and
I'm
going
to
introduce
the
rezoning
for
this
application
and
because
this
is
a
larger
scale
project,
it's
just
easier
to
show
you
the
aerial
map
and
identify
the
area
founded
by
this
project
area.
So
the
area
is
outlined
in
red.
So
to
orient
you
on
this
map,
this
is
atomo.
D
This
is
nucial
and
this
is
nebraska
avenue,
so
this
is
15..
So
these
are
the
parcels
included
in
this
area
in
the
project
area
outlined
in
red
this
area,
here,
that's
outlined
in
red,
is
actually
by
mistake.
This
was
a
phase
one
of
the
project.
This
is
a
rezoning
that
was
approved
in
2021..
D
This
is
the
property
that
is
included,
so
is
this
west
half
central
and
these
eastern
blocs,
so
the
request
is
this
is,
let
me
specify
this
is
application
red
21
114.
D
The
request
is
to
rezone
the
property
from
ig
industrial
general
pd
plan
development,
yc9
yc6yc2,
eboor
city,
our
m24
residential
multifamily,
ih,
industrial,
heavy
to
pda
plan
development,
alternative
and
the
applicant
under
this
request
is
being
represented
by
tyler
hudson
and
what
I'll
do
is
turn
it
over
to
the
planning
commission
to
give
their
report
and
then
I'll
come
back
and
give
my
report.
Thank
you.
T
Danny
collins,
again
with
your
planning
commission's
staff,
I've
been
sworn
in.
Our
next
case
is
within
the
central
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically
in
the
iwork
city
and
central
park.
Urban
villages.
Portions
of
the
subject
site
are
located
within
the
downtown
periphery
bonus
area,
the
coastal
hazard
area
and
the
ybor
city
local
district.
T
The
closest
public
recreation
facility
is
tampa
park,
plaza,
which
is
located
directly
to
the
southeast
of
the
subject:
site
heart
routes,
8-9
serve
the
subject
site,
providing
connections
to
brandon
and
the
university
areas.
Also,
the
hartiko
streetcar
line
also
serves
the
site
connecting
the
site
to
ivor
city
in
downtown.
Tampa
subject:
site
is
within
a
level
a
evacuation
zone.
T
T
This
is
the
adopted
future
land
use.
Map
subject.
Site
is
recognized
under
three
future
land
use
designations.
A
substantial
portion
of
the
subject
cited
is
recognized
under
the
regional
mixed
use.
100
designation,
this
red
is
land
that
represents
land
recognized
under
the
cc35
designation
and
then
this
area
over
here
generally
to
the
northeast
northeast
portions
of
the
of
the
planet
plan
development
is
recognized
under
the
cmu
35
future
land
use
designation.
T
Overall,
this
area
is
trending
towards
a
more
mixed
use.
Development
pattern
there
have
been
multiple
plant
amendments
within
this
area
and
including
on
portions
of
the
subject.
Site
have
been
recently
changed
over
the
past
few
years
to
a
more
mixed
use
to
a
mixed
use.
Category
the
applicant
is
utilizing
land
use
policy,
5.1.6
and
the
cbd
periphery
bonus
to
allow
an
overall,
far
4.6,
all
three
of
the
future
land
use
designations,
allow
the
applicant
to
utilize
four
air
ratio
to
determine
the
maximum
development
potential
and
support
to
make
that
support
a
mixed-use
development
pattern.
T
This
level
of
density
is
encouraged
by
the
comprehensive
plan,
especially
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district,
which
is
viewed
as
the
primary
urban
employment
center,
where
mixed
use
development
is
encouraged
in
the
city.
The
proposed
pda
supports
many
of
the
comprehensive
plant
policies
relating
to
mixed
use,
development
and
providing
densities
that
support
transit,
consistent,
which
are
consistent
with
the
compact
city
forum
strategy.
The
design
book
also
proposes
many
urban
style
development
concepts
with
placing
the
buildings
close
to
the
public
sidewalks,
providing
internal
pedestrian
connections
and
active
or
activating
ground
floor
uses.
T
The
design
book
furthers
the
comprehensive
plan
by
providing
a
step
down
in
height
and
materials
that
complement
the
ivor
city
for
those
parcels
located
within
the
local
historic
district.
Lastly,
the
proposed
4471
residential
units
will
provide
additional
housing
opportunities
for
tampa's
growing
population.
T
The
planning
commission
staff
and
the
applicant
exchanged
several
emails
regarding
the
density
and
intensity
of
the
subject
site
after
review
of
the
data
the
planet,
commission
staff
requests
that
between
first
and
second
readings,
the
apple
can
revise
the
development
entitlement
chart
to
reflect
the
total
allowable
square
footage
of
1
million
185
504
square
feet
and
blocks
e1
through
e7,
as
one
million
eight
hundred
and
five
thousand
eight
hundred
forty
six
square
feet
and
those
numbers
are
provided
in
your
staff
report.
T
Based
on
these
considerations,
the
planet,
commission
staff
finds
the
request
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
city
of
tampa
conference
of
plan.
This
concludes
my
presentation,
my
volvo
for
any
questions.
Any.
A
D
None
thank
you,
council
of
sean
doc,
development
coordination
and
again
this
is
item
13
for
rec
21-114.
D
I
would
like
to
mention
council
that
we
have
on
ron
villa
here
with
us
this
evening,
he's
with
historic
preservation
he's
available
in
case.
There
are
any
questions,
since
this
property
is
partially
located
within
the
historic
district
and
I'll
mention
some
about
the
blc
recommendation
and
approval
and
erin
mayer
is
here
and
I'm
going
to
have
her
speak
on
the
natural
resources
aspects
of
the
report.
D
So,
first
before
I
start
the
report,
I
did
want
to
discuss
for
council's
sake
and
the
public's
sake,
just
again
the
pda
process
and
what
is
required.
What
is
a
pda,
a
plan,
development
alternative
with
the
pda?
You
would
receive
a
plan
that
provides
an
outline
or
a
border
of
the
boundary
of
the
project
area.
You
would
not
see
specific
detail
on
a
pda.
D
You
would
not
see
curb
cuts,
you're,
not
going
to
see
parking
spaces
or
building
placement.
That
would
be
done
at
the
time
of
incremental
site
plan
review.
Pdas
are
typically
for
phase
development
and
they
must
come
in
for
incremental
review
at
the
time
of
review
at
the
incremental
site
plan
review
process.
D
The
plan
must
be
consistent
with
the
overall
pda,
so
the
pda
would
typically
come
with
entitlements
and
that
in
a
design
book-
and
that
is
the
case
for
this
project-
which
I
will
review
with
you
shortly-
and
that
dictates
the
development
on
the
site,
along
with
the
design
in
a
pd
site
plan.
You
have
more
of
that
detail.
You
see
the
exact
layout
of
the
site.
You
can
see
the
buffering
everything
is
shown
on
the
pd
site
plan.
D
So
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
just
go
start
into
the
description
with
the
project.
You've
been
given
some
background
from
planning
commission
staff,
but
this
project
is
the
gas
works
project.
It
includes
the
redevelopment
of
over
26
acres
site.
D
The
pda
site
plan
includes
a
master
set
of
entitlements.
These
include
development
standards
and
design
guidelines,
which
is
included
in
the
design
guidelines
book.
This
also
includes
an
associated
developer's
agreement,
a
vacating
which
you
just
heard
from
ross
and
also
a
bonus
provision.
Agreement
has
been
granted
or
you'll
hear
that,
as
part
of
that
is
the
next
item
for
this
evening.
D
All
of
these
divide.
They
guide
the
development
on
the
site.
So
I
have
the
map.
I
wanted
to
show
the
aerial
again
just
to
show
you
the
surrounding
zoning.
For
the
area.
You
have
a
couple
of
pd's
ig
zoning
districts.
A
lot
of
the
area
has
industrial
or
vacant
and
commercial
uses.
Also,
you
have
the
more
commercial
zoning
designations
towards
nebraska,
and
I'm
going
to
show
you
a
couple
of
images
to
show
you
that
line
where
the
historic
district
is
located.
So
this
is
15th
avenue.
D
D
On
this
page,
this
is
the
site
plan
that
has
been
provided.
The
blocks
on
the
site
plan
have
been
identified
by
letters.
You
have
your
western
blocks
located
to
the
west
of
nucio
with
the
w
identified.
These
are
the
the
parcels
that
are
identified,
and
this
was
a
part
of
phase
one.
They
were
approved
with
the
rev
21
rezoning.
D
So
it's
not
included
in
this
request
the
blocks
which
are
grayed,
but
these
blocks
are
included.
Then
we
have
our
central
blocks,
which
are
identified
by
the
c
c1
through
c6.
Then
we
have
our
eastern
blocks
e1
through
e7.
This
dotted
line
indicates
the
historic
district,
so
you'll
see.
Block
e2
is
partially
in
the
district
along
with
e5,
and
there
are
recommendations
which
I'll
review
in
the
report
from
the
blc,
so
those
blocks
are
identified
on
the
site
plan.
D
In
on
the
staff
report.
On
page
two,
I
have
included
a
table
which
gives
you
the
acreage
for
each
block
for
each
section,
so
for
the
western
blocks
totals
five
acres,
that's
w3.
W
four
and
five
c1
through
c6
are
the
central
blocks.
They
contain
10.4
acres
and
then
blocks
e1
to
e7
are
the
eastern
portion
and
they
contain
10.7
acres.
D
D
The
applicant
has
agreed
to
provide
affordable
housing
units,
so
that
is
one
of
the
bonus
density
options
available
and
they
are
taking
advantage
of
that
and
they
will
provide
affordable
housing
units
and
meet
that
minimum
10
percent
requirement
for
affordable
housing.
A
D
So
approximately
325,
affordable
units,
yes,
and
so
the
design
guideline
books
have
been
provided.
There
are
there's
a
separate
design
book
that
runs
with
this
site
plan
and
that
contains
all
of
the
elements
that
determine
your
building
frontages,
the
the
design,
types
and
design
elements
and
public
realm
treatment
among
the
things
in
the
design
book
are
also
street
classification,
so
there
are
priorities
to
the
streets
that
have
been
identified,
so
I
just
want
to
show
you
quickly
on
this
map.
D
This
again
is
this
dotted
line
is
the
historic
district
identified,
but
there
are
three
street
classifications:
you
have
a
a
street,
a
b
street
and
a
c
street,
and
they
are
identified
by
color,
but
your
a
street
type
has
the
highest
pedestrian
activity
it
serves
as
the
building's
front.
The
b
street
is
the
pedestrian
is
pedestrian
in
character
and
it
features
your
mixed
use
in
your
storefront
residential
or
your
storefront,
commercial
plus
parking
and
loading,
and
you
see
street
that
that
serves
as
the
service.
D
That's
for
your
loading,
your
solid
waste
collection,
those
things
so
the
massing
has
in
scale,
has
been
designed
sensitive
to
the
surrounding
historic
area.
These
are
just
a
couple
of
elevations.
These
are
part
of
the
design
book,
so
there's
one
that
I
will
show
you
for
each
typical
building.
This
is
a
typical
low-rise
development
and
they
would
be
contained
within
the
block.
D
So
here
it
identifies
the
blocks
which
are
the
eastern
blocks
closest
to
the
historic
district,
and
you
can
see
that
that
provides
for
low
rise
development,
maximum
height
of
65
feet
and
then
within
the
e-2
not
exceeding
75
feet.
D
D
D
This
is
the
roundabout.
The
current
roundabout
that
will
be
open
space
area
west
of
c2
is
the
north
end
of
the
project
area.
This
is
on
the
northeast
corner
of
4th
avenue
near
block
81.
This
is
north.
The
north
end
of
the
site,
that's
another
view
of
the
north.
This
is
the
north
end
of
the
site,
but
this
is
the
view
looking
at
the
parcels
on
the
north
on
the
west
block,
so
the
west
block
will
be
located
here
across
nucia.
D
Another
view
of
the
west:
these
are
the
north
blocks.
Then
we
make
our
way
on
the
western
block.
That's
block
w3.
This
is
another
western
view.
That's
looking
south
on
scott
street,
so
we're
heading
down
south
scott
street,
another
view
on
south
on
scott
and
then
we
end
up
at
the
western
end
of
the
site
on
maryland
and
then
back
to
the
south.
Sorry-
and
this
is
south
of
the
expressway
and
then
that's
looking
north.
D
So
this
site
was
heard
before
this
project
was
heard
before
the
blc.
It
was
on
june
28
2020.
On
page
three
of
the
staff
report,
you'll
find
the
recommendations
from
the
blc.
There
are
a
list
of
recommendations
that
are
requested.
There
are
three.
These
changes
have
been
incorporated
in
the
revised
site
plan.
D
The
height
allowed
is
65
feet
with
a
maximum
of
85
feet
placed
along
the
south
side
of
the
property,
and
this
is
all
because
they
are
bordering
the
historic
district
or
located
within
the
historic
district
for
block
e5.
It's
allowed
a
maximum
height
of
65
feet
and
that
has
been
notated
on
the
site
plan
is
mentioned,
so
the
drc
staff
reviewed
the
request,
finds
the
request.
Inconsistent
you'll,
see
the
findings
from
natural
resources
and
from
development
coordination
within
the
staff
report
and
I'll
have
erin
come
up
and
she
can
go
over
her
comments.
D
The
revisions
required
have
been
made
when
you're
looking
at
a
project
of
this
size.
The
applicant
has
worked
with
staff.
It
is
hard
to
get
all
of
the
changes
into
the
site
plan
by
the
deadline
to
review.
So
you
see
a
lot
of
changes
on
the
revision
sheet,
but
for
a
project
of
this
size,
it's
not
you
know
rare
to
have
that
those
changes
have
been
made.
D
They
are
mostly
minor
in
nature
and
the
applicant
agrees
to
make
those
changes
between
first
and
second
reading
and
so
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
aaron
and
I'm
available.
If
you
have
any
questions,
any
questions.
O
O
O
Minimum
30
percent
of
total
open
space
must
be
placed
at
grade
and
meet
the
definition
of
public
open
space.
So
this
would
mean
that
each
of
the
16
parcels
would
get
approximately
1.4
percent
open
space.
Current
code
requirements
would
be
for
multi-family
green
space.
Over
six
stories
is
30
percent
of
the
parcel
minus
building
footprint,
because
again
this
isn't
in
the
cbd.
O
So
the
compromise
natural
resources
staff.
We
recommend
that
15
open
spaces
provided
over
the
entire
site,
and
this
would
mean
that
6.3
of
each
remaining
of
the
16
parcels
would
get.
What
did
I
say
that
right?
Each
of
the
16
parcels
would
then
get
6.3
open
space
instead
of
1.4
and
the
reason
that
we
are
proposing
these
changes
out
of
the
the
cbd
requirements
are
due
to
a
couple
of
surrounding
pds
in
the
area.
The
encore
raz1420
had
15
percent
open
space
requirements
and
another
project
at
1307.
O
O
It
has
a
table
in
that
project
that
says
the
average
green
space
by
zoning
and
land
development
code
category.
So
in
the
central
business
district
and
the
channel
district,
that's
approximately
19
percent,
and
this
is
a
combination
of
tree
canopy
and
grass
and
shrub,
and
in
ebor
city
yc1,
the
the
average
or
the
the
tree
canopy
grass
shrub
coverage
is
16.
O
O
Currently,
there
are
103
trees
on
the
site,
which
this
is
a
very
sparsely
canopy
location.
There's
not
a
lot
of
trees
on
27
acres
and
62
of
those
trees
are
palms.
So
there
aren't
a
lot
of
oaks,
but
there
are
five
grand
oaks
or
grand
trees
on
the
site.
Over
these
27
acres,
two
of
them
are
hazardous,
which
you'll
see
in
the
red
dots
on
your
your
item
in
front
of
you,
those
trees
are
being
removed.
That's
we
are
okay
with
that
and
there
are
three
non-hazardous
grand
trees.
O
One
of
them
is
being
preserved.
That's
over
here
on
e5,
all
the
way
to
the
east
and
the
other
one
number
283
is
on
w-4
parcel,
that's
being
removed
or
the
applicant
is
requesting
a
waiver
for
that
tree
removal,
and
then
we
have
w5,
which
is
shown
here
in
the
the
lower
photo
in
the
screen.
This
is
tree
number
287,
it's
on
parcel
w5,
it's
a
45
inch.
Diameter
live
of
rated
b5,
and
this
is
looking
east
from
scott
street.
B
This
is
the
development
agreement
that
goes
along
with
the
subject
rezoning.
You
were
provided
a
development
agreement
that
was
uploaded
into
sire.
We
have
made
a
few
changes
to
the
development
agreement,
to
make
it
clear
that
that
development
agreement
does
not
bind
the
cra
for
any
approval
or
for
any
funding.
The
applicant
may
be
approaching
the
cra
requesting
funding.
However,
this
development
agreement
is
contingent
upon
a
separate
cra
funding
agreement
being
executed.
B
So
I
just
want
to
make
it
clear
that
this
agreement
is
between
the
development
and
the
development
developer
and
the
city
of
tampa.
It
is
not.
The
cra
is
not
a
party
to
this
agreement.
A
B
A
T
I
wanted
one
of
my
concerns.
Also
was
this
this
cra
thing
and,
and
this
is
not
a
message
to
the
to
the
developer
or
the
applicants-
it's
it's
just
a
message
to
the
city.
Imagine
if-
and
I've
used
this
analogy
before,
but
imagine
that
the
city
had
an
agreement
with
habitat
for
humanity
and
the
habitat
people
read
it
at
the
last
minute
and
realized
that
they
were
obligated
to
do
something
in
the
agreement.
T
It
surprised
me
when
I
saw
this
the
other
day
that
there's
a
whole
list
of
projects
that
four,
I
think
four
different
cra
districts
are
expected
to
pay
for,
and
you
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
sensitivity
in
the
community
about
how
the
cra
money
is
spent
and
it's
it's
a
special
set
of
money,
that's
supposed
to
be
spent
for
special
circumstances
and
as
board
members.
T
One
is
who
negotiated
this
without
informing
anybody
on
the
cra
number
two
I
had
asked
also-
and
I
haven't
been
able
to
read
through
all
the
the
new
version
of
the
document
completely,
but
I
had
asked
that
if
this
this
exception
should
be
qualified
because
of
city
or
cra
money
that
would
pay
for
this.
T
One
of
the
one
of
the
concerns
and
complaints
we
get
about
cra
money
is
that
the
cra
should
not
pay
for
things
the
city
would
have
otherwise
paid
for,
and
it
looks
to
me
like
a
lot
of
the
lit
things
on
the
list
could
be
paid
for
by
the
city
instead
of
the
cra
and
so
I'd.
Rather,
the
documents
say
that
the
city
or
the
cra
would
pay
for
it.
B
I
I
was
just
gonna
answer,
most
likely
a
second
question,
so
the
cra
was
not
involved
in
this,
because
this
does
not
bind
the
cra.
This
specifically
states
that
it
does
not
bind
the
cra
and
it
specifically
states
that
it's
contingent
on
a
cra
funding
agreement
being
negotiated
if
the
cra
approves
it.
So
there's
nothing
in
here
that
obligates
the
cra.
T
Yeah
and
and
the
the
point
is
that
if
it's
contingent
on
cra
funding
and
not
city
or
cra
funding,
then
if
the
cra
decides
to
not
defend
it,
then
then
that
is
a
breach
of
the
agreement
or
or
a
failure
in
the
agreement,
and
it
seems
to
me
the
cra
shouldn't
be
shouldn't,
be
involved
in
that
at
all,
or
at
least
it
should
be
the
city
or
the
cra,
because
if,
if
we
go
to
the
cacs
and
there's
an
uproar
and
the
cacs
don't
want
to
cover
some
part
of
it
and
the
community
doesn't
want
to
cover
some
part
of
it,
there's
no
outlet
for
the
for
the
city
to
take
over
instead.
C
And
I'll
let
miss
johns
and
miss
travis
correct
me,
but
there's
a
revised
agreement
that
I
don't
think
maybe
you've
seen
councilman
carlson.
That
makes
it
very
clear
really
that
neither
the
city
nor
the
cra
are
bound
to
fund
any
of
the
infrastructure
improvements
that
are
listed
in
the
development
agreement.
C
L
A
T
So
as
long
as
it
says,
city
and
cra-
I
just
don't
want
to
see
if,
if,
if
this
is
a
reason,
if
the
cra
decides
not
to
fund
something,
I
don't
want
that
to
be
the
reason
that
this
whole
project
doesn't
go
forward
when
the
city
could
have
funded
it
and
also
the
city.
This
area
has
not
been
a
part
of
this
agreement
or
this
negotiation
at
all.
C
I
I
think,
I
think,
and
again
I
I'll
refer
to
the
folks
that
negotiate
agreement,
but
I
think
the
funding
of
these
infrastructure
improvements
are
still
unclear,
and
so
this
development
agreement
may
have
to
be
amended
at
some
juncture.
I
believe
it
also
contemplates
the
infrastructure
agreement
that
has
to
be
negotiated.
That
has
not
been
negotiated
yet
any
potential
cra
funding
agreement
with
no
obligation
on
the
part
of
the
cra
to
fund.
So
those
are.
Q
C
Out
and
to
be
determined
in
a
in
a
two-year
period,
councilman
carlson.
T
And
sorry,
it
seemed
to
me
that,
like
with
the
analogy
of
habitat
for
humanity,
sorry
it's
a
bad
analogy,
but
if
the
city
was
negotiating
and
they
said
we're
gonna
pay
some
part
of
affordable
housing,
they
wouldn't
they
wouldn't
put
a
contingency
for
habitat
to
to
be
on
the
hook
or
be
blamed.
If
the
deal
didn't
go
through.
T
Instead,
the
city
would
say
we
we're
going
to
cover
this
in
some
way
and
by
the
way
we're
going
to
ask
habitat
to
participate
with
us,
because
the
cra
is
a
completely
separate
entity,
and
so
it
the
cra
shouldn't,
have
had
such
a
big
role
in
this,
especially
without
cra
board,
even
being
informed
of
it.
O
N
If
I
may
councilman
carlson's
question
about
who
negotiated
this
agreement
and
with
the
cra,
I
am
the
person
that
has
been
communicating
with
the
developer
and
his
consultants
and
his
attorney.
There's
no
formal
agreement
right
now,
we're
not
at
the
level
of
detail
to
outline
what
specifically
we
are.
We
know
that
there
is
an
ask.
There
will
be
an
ask
of
the
cra
we
have
been
talking
about
that.
N
We
do
not
have
it
figured
out,
and
there
is
nothing
to
for
me
to
concrete
for
me
to
present
to
the
cac
or
to
the
cra
board
at
at
this
time.
The
the
applicant's
attorney
can
speak
to
more
why
they
needed
this
as
a
part
of
the
agreement
in
development
agreements.
It
is
really
hard
when
you
have
development
of
this
size,
if
you're
thinking
of
different
funding
sources
to
make
the
project
holistic
and
complete
it
needs
to
the
agreement
needs
to
at
least
contemplate
that
you
are
going
to
talk
to
another
agency
for
a
funding.
N
I
understand
the
the
need,
or
the
request
to
put
city
or
cra
can
contribute
to
the
project
that
councilman
carlson
is
asking
for,
but
this
does
not
bind
the
cra
anyway.
I
can't
approve
anything
without
the
cra
board,
so
it
would
come
before
the
cra
board.
This
is
merely
to
continue
this
development
of
this
scale,
moving
forward
on
a
path
to
completion.
G
I
think
the
question
is,
and
I
kind
of
see
mr
carlson's
point
is
that
I'm
just
handed
this
pack,
you
say
it
came
out
a
couple
days
ago,
so
this
came
out
a
couple
days
ago
I
mean
when
we
read
stuff,
I
mean
this
is
a
lot
to
read
in
a
short
period
of
time
and
when
I
open
the
packet.
All
I
see
is
cra
cra.
When
I
read
it.
B
So
the
development
agreement
was
loaded
into
sire
the
two
weeks
ago
for
this
hearing
pursuant
to
councilman
carlson's
concerns.
We
went
back
this
week
and
worked
with
the
developer
and
revised
the
agreement
to
specifically
clarify
that
the
cra
was
not
obligated
to
approve
any
of
this
to
pay
for
any
of
this.
Until
there
was
a
cra
funding
agreement.
G
N
G
In
that
case,
I
only
wish
that
call
email
says
and
make
sure
we
check
with
this
kind
of
project,
with
three
three
projects
on
here
tonight
to
be
voted
on
possibly
and
this
bkb
document
here
I
have
been
going
through
this
whole
document
to
to
clarify.
C
One
thing
you
are
not
voting
on
the
development
agreement
tonight
there
are
two
public
hearings,
and
so
this
is
just
the
first
hearing.
You
will
not
be
voting
on
the
development
agreement
formally
until
the
next
reading.
Next
final
hearing
under
state
law,
we
have
to
have
two
public
hearings
before
you
can
adopt
the
development
agreement,
see.
T
Try
just
just
to
reiterate
again
sorry
to
be
a
broken
record,
but
I
just
think
it's
that
in
bad
form
and
disrespectful
to
to
obligate
a
third
party
and
even
though
it's
not
it's
not
signing
that
they
that
they
will
do
something.
What
it
should
say
and
said
is
that
is
that
the
city
will
do
its
best
to
work
with
third
parties
to
get
the
funding
for
these
projects
and
either
the
city
will
pay
for
work
with
a
third
party,
and
then
the
city
would
go
to
the
cra.
T
T
I
had
no
conversation
with
anybody
about
it
until
a
couple
days
ago,
and
and
once
we
take
this
out
of
the
cacs
and
others
they
may,
they
may
say
yeah
yeah,
but
also
what
they
might
say
is
hey
certain
things
here
should
be
paid
by
the
city,
not
the
cra,
and
so
I
would
just
ask
in
the
future
that
the
city
be
respectful
of
the
difference
between
the
city
and
the
cra
and
that
we
and
that
we
can
and
understand
that
the
cra
is
a
separate
entity
just
like
we
would
not
obligate
bank
of
america
or
or
habitat
or
anybody
else.
T
We
would
a
difference
there
because
there's
a
whole
apparatus
that
manages
it
and
again,
as
I
said
in
the
beginning,
it's
no
criticism
of
any
of
the
proposals.
It's
just
it's
just
from
a
city
point
of
view.
I
think
we
need
to
remember
that
those
are
two
separate
entities
and
we
can't
we.
We
can't
set
it
like.
A
J
We
have
a
cra
meeting
on
the
18th.
Is
this
something
that
you
plan
to
bring
to
talk
to
the
board
about
at.
A
N
Was
just
going
to
say
as
soon
as
we
get
more
details
and
we
get
to
that
point,
I
cannot
negotiate
as
your
cra
director
or
as
the
administrative
development
and
economic
opportunity
without
bringing
that
to
the
cac
to
get
their
concurrence
to
make
sure
that
it
is
something
that
they
want
to
support
and
that
this
cra
board
wants
to
want
to
support.
Our
initial
conversations
have
been
around
the
overall
planning.
What
you're
considering
to
tonight
for
the
zoning,
the
master
planning,
if
you
will
of
this
large-scale
development.
B
A
F
Good
evening
petitioner,
good
evening
council,
my
name
is
tyler
hudson,
my
address
is
400
north
ashley
drive
and
it's
an
honor
to
be
here
this
evening
on
behalf
of
the
gasworks
project.
I
want
to
thank
council
for
allowing
us
to
move
up
on
the
agenda.
I
promise
we're
going
to
be
very
efficient
with
our
time.
I
know
it's
been
a
long
day
and
a
little
bit
of
a
long
evening.
We
have
two
open
items
in
the
for
two
open,
quasi-judicial
items
that
gives
us
30
minutes
for
our
presentation.
F
F
F
F
The
project
that
we're
presenting
here,
the
three
items
that
are
before
you
this
evening
are
really
the
culmination
of
multiple
approvals
that
this
council
has
already
provided
to
the
project,
perhaps
a
little
bit
more
indirect,
less
specifics
than
the
approvals
we're
seeking
this
evening.
One
of
the
most
important
ones
happened.
I
believe
this
was
filed
actually
in
mid-2020,
maybe
just
after
the
pandemic
started
pdas
these
flexible
zoning
instruments
that
lashawn
did
such
a
great
job
describing
until
earlier
last
year.
Those
are
only
available
for
projects
of
50,
acres
or
larger.
F
In
addition
to
that
pda
threshold
reduction,
this
council
has
approved
multiple
comprehensive
plan
amendments
with
this.
When
we
were
confronted
with
this
site,
it
was
really
sort
of
a
patchwork
of
heavy
industrial
light,
industrial
and
then
some
extremely
low
density,
mixed
use,
future
land
use.
This
council
has
approved
comprehensive
plan
map
amendments
for
over
a
dozen
acres
going
to
up
to
rmu,
100
60
and
fully
really
de-industrializing
the
area
which
is
consistent
with
what's
been
happening
in
the
channel
district
just
to
the
south.
F
And
finally,
I
would
note
that
the
council
may
recall
last
december.
We
were
here
for
what
we
call
phase.
One
of
gas
works.
That's
really
at
the
most
northwesterly
part
of
the
project.
It's
west
of
nucio,
that's
about
720
dwelling
units,
20
000
square
feet
of
retail
that
this
council
approved
back
in
december.
That's
a
pd!
That's
that's!
Not
before
you
this
evening.
That's
that's
separate
one
day.
F
We
might
want
to
bring
it
back
into
this
pda,
but
all
of
those
approvals
are
what
put
us
in
the
position
to
ask
for
your
approval
on
these
two
items
that
are
tonight
and
just
to
reiterate.
Well,
I
said,
there's
two
items
now
I
have
something
that
has
four
numbers
on
it.
Let
me
explain
this
exactly
what
you're
approving
this
evening.
The
first
thing
is
the
right-of-way
vacating
that
ross
alluded
to.
You
can
see
a
little
bit
on
screen.
F
That
is
for
this
portion
of
what
was
mississippi
avenue
and
then
up
here
is
for
third
avenue.
The
reason
why
we
want
to
vacate
that
right
away
is
because
it's
going
to
allow
us
to
put
in
some
mixed-use
trails
that
will
go
along
adamo
drive
and
then
for
third
avenue
we're
trying
to
vacate
that
to
put
in
place
a
pedestrian-only
thoroughfare
that
we're
calling
the
paseo
and
which
alan's
going
to
talk
to
you
about
in
a
little
bit.
The
second
thing
that's
being
approved
is
the
pda
rezoning
itself
right
now.
F
This
land
is
a
total
mixture,
hodgepodge
of
various
zoning
categories,
we're
seeking
to
put
all
26
acres
under
a
pda
site
plan.
It's
conceptual
it's
a
bubble
plan
doesn't
have
exactly
where
the
trash
compactor
is
going
to
be
and
where
the
parking
spaces
are.
But
it
allows
us
to
develop
up
to
a
maximum
about
5.2
million
square
feet.
F
It
puts
in
ranges
of
where
we
think
we're
going
to
end
up
in
terms
of
office,
development,
retail
development
dwelling
units
and
that's
accompanied
by
a
design
guidelines
book
that
I
think
at
final
count
got
to
maybe
around
86
pages.
That's
the
set
of
rules.
That's
our
playbook!
We're
not
going
to
be
using
the
standard
chapter.
27
rules,
for
which
we
would
be
seeking
waivers
as
this
council
sees
once
or
twice
on
a
usual
thursday
evening,
we're
imposing
our
our
own
design
regulations
on
ourselves
and
that's
what
alan
is
going
to
talk
about
now.
S
Okay
good
evening,
I'm
alan
ward,
with
sasaki
and
I'll
summarize
the
vision
and
the
plan
for
the
gas
works
district.
S
So
the
this
is
a
view
looking
south
from
ybor
city
towards
downtown,
and
you
see
the
site
is
outlined
in
red,
that
27
or
so
acres-
and
you
see
the
site
today-
is
mostly
industrial
uses
or
vacant
land
and
I'll
cover
these
four
topics.
To
summarize
our
plan,
beginning
with
the
historic
context,
there's
some
interesting
older
images
to
see
the
evolution
of
this
site.
S
So
here
it
is
the
site
in
1938
you
can
see
dominated
by
the
gas
works
facility
itself
and
the
grid
was
not
totally
intact
here,
except
west
of
the
railroad
right
away.
You
can
see
there
was
intact
the
city
grid
and
we're
going
to
restore
that
and
bring
that
back
as
part
of
this
plan
here,
reviews
in
the
1920s
looking
north
from
fourth
avenue,
that's
the
florida
brewery
building
in
the
foreground
and
then
the
fabric
and
texture
of
ebor
city
north
of
this
site,
so
we're
south
of
that
area.
S
And
then,
when
you
look
south
on
what
is
that
should
say,
15th
street
or
channel
side
later,
you
can
see
largely
vacant
except
for
the
gas
works
facility
and
some
warehouse
buildings.
S
So
here
we
are
in
1920s
again
there's
the
gas
works
facility
dominating
the
site
and
then
here's
the
edge
of
ybor
city
looking
south
from
6th
avenue
largely
vacant
at
that
time.
So
this
was
kind
of
a
collection
area
for
industrial
uses,
pieces
of
city,
infrastructure
highways
and
so
forth.
So
our
goal
here
is
to
knit
this
back
together
and
reconnect
it
to
the
city.
S
So
the
first
and
key
element
is
to
bring
back
the
grid,
which
was
largely
lost
over
the
years
with
two
key
connections.
You
see.
Fourth
avenue
is
straightened
out.
It
replaces
the
roundabout.
The
large
curving
street
makes
a
link
over
the
railroad
to
nick
nuccio
parkway
to
the
west.
Likewise,
atomo
drive
is
linked
over
the
railroad
to
nick
nuccio
parkway
as
well.
So
two
important
connections
made
within
the
pattern.
S
The
grid
then
re-establishing
the
grid
in
the
heart
of
the
plan,
as
well
as,
where
possible,
on
the
tampa
park
site
tampa
park
apartment
site
at
the
center.
You
see
that
dot.
That
means
this
whole
area
is
within
a
five
minute:
walk
based
on
that
radius
and
that
dot
is
on
a
key
parcel
and
a
key
building.
An
old
warehouse
building,
we'll
talk
about
how
that
becomes
reused
as
part
of
the
heart
of
this
redevelopment.
S
There
also
are
some
important
trail
connections
that
we
can
add
to
or
supplement
you
see.
The
green
line
on
the
bottom
is
the
existing
selman
greenway
along
the
north
side
of
atomo.
It
loops
up
the
channel
site
back
down
to
the
selman
expressway
under
it,
there's
a
rendering
of
it
on
the
right
we're
adding
an
east-west
connector
on
that
north
side
of
adamo
that
you
heard
about
earlier
in
that
vacated
land
it
extends
west
over.
The
railroad
connects
over
to
nick
nuccio
parkway,
so
it
links
to
selman
west
to
the
parkway.
S
Another
new
trail
in
the
plan
is
on
the
south
side
of
that
curving
railroad
right
away,
and
that
is
a
really
intriguing
connection,
because
it
links
you
from
the
riverwalk
water
street
in
the
south
all
the
way
up
to
the
heart
of
ybor
city.
So
these
are
important.
New
connections
and
linkages
that
are
brought
to
this
area,
so,
with
this
overlay
of
the
new
streets,
it
brings
the
public
streets
and
their
sidewalks
it's
kind
of
an
overlay
on
what
was
a
much
larger
scale
district
industrial
area.
S
We
also
the
trails,
are
part
of
the
public
framework,
new
public
framework
that
I
just
described.
There
also
are
some
key
public
spaces.
You
see
on
that
block
e2
just
to
the
west
of
it
is
a
new
park
which
is
on
the
land
that
was
previously
the
roundabout
for
for
cars
that
becomes
a
new
park
for
people.
Just
south
of
e2
is
the
vacated
third
avenue,
which
becomes
a
paseo,
a
pedestrian
connection
that
leads
into
that
park,
space
to
channel
side
and
just
adjacent.
That
is
then
a
proposed
new
street
car
stop.
S
So
that
starts
to
become
the
focus
and
the
heart
of
the
redevelopment
of
this
district.
The
heart
of
the
mixed
use
program
where
food
beverage
and
retail
will
occur
around
that
locus
of
public,
open
space,
paseo
street
car
stop
and
the
reuse
of
this
industrial
building,
which
we'll
show
you
in
more
detail,
there's
a
couple
other
open
spaces.
Also
to
the
south
along
the
railroad
right
away
as
well,
so
this
industrial
building
warehouse
building
it
occupies
the
whole
block.
It's
rather
large.
S
Perhaps
a
cultural
arts
use
with
some
events
that
would
be
programmed
here,
an
event
space
that
people
could
rent
out
as
kind
of
a
centerpiece
in
the
community.
So
this
is
a
real
place
of
discovery
where
all
these
kind
of
activities
at
the
heart
would
occur
within
this
building
and
you'll
see
more
illustrations
that
as
we
go
forward,
so
here's
a
rendering
on
14th
street
looking
south.
So
that's
third
avenue
to
the
right,
which
becomes
the
paseo
that's
just
south
of
the
reused
industrial
building
on
the
right.
S
So
that's
where
the
restaurants
would
open
up
on
that
paseo,
like
you
see
in
the
images
on
the
right-
and
this
also
shows
the
scale
of
buildings
transitioning
down
from
taller
buildings
towards
the
selman
expressway,
to
lower
buildings,
kind
of
in
the
heart
of
things
and
then
lower.
Yet
as
you
get
near
historic,
ibor,
city
and
you'll
see
more
of
that
in
the
3d
model
as
we
go
forward
and
then
this
rendering
is
looking
east
we're
just
kind
of
over
the
railroad
and
nick
nuccio
parkway.
Looking
towards
that
reused,
industrial
building.
S
H
I'm
nick
mansfer
with
design
collective
architects
and
we're
going
to
show
a
couple
images
of
the
existing
character
and
then
a
fly-through
of
the
vision
for
for
the
gas
works
so
throughout
the
entire
process
and
with
the
packet
and
everything
you've
seen.
We've
always
been
cognizant
of
the
historic
nature
of
ybor
city
and
how
the
rich
historic
character
of
that
architecture
should
be
influenced
or
should
be
influencing
the
scale
and
the
level
of
detail.
H
That's
going
to
happen
in
this
development
and
there's
a
couple
of
very
specific
things,
such
as
the
ornate
brick
work
that
we
see
in
many
of
the
buildings
in
ybor
city
and
along
7th.
We
see
a
lot
of
larger
scale,
taller
windows
that
really
start
to
set
up
some
of
the
character
of
that
architecture.
H
Also,
the
balconies
that
we
see
along
seventh
avenue
and
in
the
district
are
often
clustered
together,
sometimes
they're,
private
balconies
and
sometimes
they're
public
or
commercial
balconies
that
set
up
a
ground
level
and
second
level
public
element
to
to
the
experience
in
ebore.
These
are
all
elements
that
are
going
to
be
utilized
as
tools
and
devices
in
the
architecture
and
the
character
in
this
development.
Just
south
of
historic
eboor.
H
H
The
image
on
your
right
is
a
southeast
looking
perspective
so
in
the
foreground.
The
tree
line
street
is
new,
show
coming
in
and
hitting
the
seventh
avenue
intersection,
and
so
you
can
see
again
the
scale
of
existing
ibor.
You
can
see
the
florida
brewery
about
center
on
that
right
image
and
how
that
has
a
prominence
and
a
hierarchy
within
the
community
and
that's
something
that's
to
be
maintained
even
with
this
new
development.
H
The
next
image
is
not
necessarily
to
be
studied
for
architectural
character,
but
just
to
be
suggestive
of
the
scale
of
buildings
that
are
being
looked
at
for
the
development,
so
within
the
historic
district.
Looking
at
low
density,
you
can
see
in
this
rendering
three
to
five
stories
allowing
those
scales
to
be
to
change
as
we
cross
streets
and
as
we
get
towards
the
middle
image,
we're
at
the
middle
portion
of
the
site
from
a
north-south
perspective.
So
we're
looking
at
buildings
that
are
a
little
bit
taller.
H
They
celebrate
their
commercial
aspect,
the
mixed
use
on
the
ground
floor
and
then
residential
office
or
hotel
above
and
many
of
these
buildings
have
elevated
courtyards
or
at
grade
courtyards.
That
might
be
open
to
the
public,
as
you
can
see.
In
that
center
image,
as
well
in
terms
of
being
expressive
out
to
the
streetscape
as
we
get
to
the
southernmost
part
of
the
site,
we
are
talking
about
high-rise
development.
Again
this
could
be
office,
hotel
or
residential,
but
architecture
that
is
able
to
obtain
views
over
to
the
to
the
to
the
bay
front.
H
So,
as
a
conceptual
rendering
and
again
this
is
just
conceptual
architecture,
so
we
shouldn't
be
focusing
on
the
details
of
the
buildings.
This
is
a
view
that
is
hovering
above
seventh
and
we're
looking
south,
so
we
can
see
nuccio
going
towards
the
central
business
district
to
the
right.
The
buildings
in
the
foreground
of
this
image
are
our
northernmost
buildings
that
fall
under
the
purview
of
the
barrio
latino
commission.
H
K
M
O
M
Good
evening
castle,
my
name
is
graham
turrell,
with
cattler
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
be
here
this
evening
and
talk
about
the
gas
works
project.
Sorry,
we
can
get
the
video
to
work.
I
think
you
guys
would
have
enjoyed
that.
So
I'm
going
to
talk
alan
and
nick
have
really
described
the
overall
sort
of
the
physical
manifestation
of
gas
works.
M
I
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
the
community
benefits
aspect
of
the
project
and
it
really
falls
into
a
couple
of
different
buckets:
the
public
improvements,
affordable,
housing,
historic
preservation
and
then
really
some
of
the
economic
impacts
that
we
see
coming
from
from
the
project
as
well,
so
starting
with
the
with
the
infrastructure
improvements.
Obviously,
in
a
project
of
this
size
there
is
substantial
infrastructure
requirements
needed
a
lot
of
the
existing
infrastructure
is
substandard.
Well,
it
really
doesn't
even
exist
today.
You
know,
as
alan
said,
we're
adding
new
streets.
M
So
a
lot
of
what
we're
talking
about
here
is
really
adding
in
new
streets,
new
utilities,
and
we
have
as
much
as
1.8
miles
of
those
in
terms
of
the
overall
neighborhood.
Obviously,
storm
water
treatment
needs
to
be
considered
and
we're
addressing
that
through
the
development
as
well,
and
then
we
also
have
a
lot.
You
can
see
the
image
there
on
the
right.
M
We
have
a
lot
of
overhead
power
lines
in
this
area,
there's
a
substation
that
sits
right
at
14th
and
4th
avenue,
and
so
we're
we're
talking
to
tco
about
putting
a
lot
of
that
overhead
power
line,
infrastructure
underground
as
well
up
to
the
extent
of
another
three
miles
per
second
overhead
power
lines,
and
then
a
big
part
of
what
we're
talking
about
as
well
is
the
csx
crossings.
Obviously
we
have
a
barrier.
M
M
Then
there
are
the
mobility
investments,
so
it's
not
just
about
putting
in
new
streets.
We
want
those
streets
to
be
walkable,
we
want
them
to
be
bike
friendly
and
we
want.
You
know
people
to
really
get
out
of
their
cars
and
start
using
transit
as
well.
So
that's
really
a
big
sort
of
motivation
of
our
entire
project
design.
M
We
have
3.6
miles
of
new
sidewalks
in
this
project,
so
it's
a
really
substantial
amount
of
new
sidewalks.
Some
of
the
you
know.
Some
of
these
sidewalks
exist
today,
but
they're
they're
very
narrow.
They
have
utility
poles
in
the
way.
Some
of
them
are
crumbling,
we're
going
to
be
repairing
all
of
those
we
have
about
1.2
miles
of
new
multi-use
trails.
M
Alan
already
mentioned
those
trails,
the
way
they're
going
to
connect
the
salmon
expressway
trail
with
the
parkway
trail,
and
then
really
you
know
it's
thinking
beyond
just
adding
those
abilities
for
people
to
get
from
place
to
place
on
further
on
bike.
We
want
to
talk
about
the
the
last
mile,
the
those
little
mobility
hubs,
that
we
need:
the
pike
racks,
the
pike
stations,
the
scooter
stations,
all
those
things
that
really
help
people
think
you
know
what
I
can.
M
I
can
get
to
my
place
of
work
and
get
to
where
I'm
going
to
this
evening
for
dinner
without
getting
in
a
car,
and
then
we've
already
talked
about
the
new
street
car
stop.
We
think.
That's
really
important.
Obviously,
channel
district
has
a
street
car.
Stop
eboard,
has
street
car
stop,
but
there's
really
nothing
in
between
and
so
there's
a
there's
a
large
gap
there,
and
we
think
it's
really.
You
know
with
the
with
the
size
development
we're
doing.
It's
really
appropriate
to
have
a
new
transit.
Stop
there
really
get
people.
M
Thinking
about
you
know
moving
downtown
all
the
way
up
to
eventually
tamper
heights
through
the
streetcar,
and
then
we
have
a
substantial
amount
of
mobility
and
mitigation
fees
that
come
along
with
this
project
as
well.
That's
five
million
dollars
there.
M
A
project
this
size
will
have
quite
considerable
environmental
enhancements
too,
as
we've
shown
you
in
those
pictures,
the
history
of
the
site
is
very
industrial
in
nature.
There's
a
lot
of
contamination
throughout
the
entire
area.
Most
of
the
area
will
ultimately,
if
not
all
of
it,
end
up
in
the
brownfields
program.
Some
of
it
already
is
so
we
will
be
remediating
a
lot
of
soils
and
replacing
you
know
bad
contamination
with
with
new
construction
when
we're
done
we're
gonna
have
two
acres
of
public
space,
open
public
space,
so
that
doesn't
exist
really
today.
M
What
we
have
today
is
actually
12
acres
of
surface
parking
and
storage
yards,
so
it's
a
really
underutilized
area
and
really
kind
of
a
bad
environmental
area.
When
you
start
to
think
about
it,
as
nick
was
saying
you
know,
the
buildings
themselves
are
not
designed
yet
this
is.
This
is
a
pda,
but
ultimately,
as
we
go
through
designing
buildings-
and
we
start
bringing
those
in,
they
will
have
lead,
they
will
have
nhab
green
building
standards,
we'll
be
looking
at
things
like
fitwell
as
well.
M
Some
really
sort
of
creative
ways
to
improve
the
livability
of
buildings,
not
just
from
an
environmental
point
of
view,
but
also
from
a
from
a
health
point
of
view,
historic
preservation,
obviously
very
important
subject
when
you're
talking
about
an
area
that
overlaps
with
with
ybor
city
as
we've
already
kind
of
referenced,
the
adaptive
reuse
of
the
warehouse
building,
it's
a
1950s
building,
it's
not
actually
a
contributing
structure,
but
we
think
you
know
based
on
those
pictures
you've
seen
tonight.
It's
got
some
really
cool
aspects
to
it,
particularly
on
the
inside
of
the
building.
M
We
think
that
could
be
a
really
important
center
of
the
community.
There
is
one
existing
contributing
structure,
an
old
house
on
the
pro
on
the
property.
That's
the
blue
house.
There
you
see
at
the
corner
of
3rd
avenue
and
14th,
and
we
have
committed
to
relocating
that
structure
elsewhere
within
the
in
the
historic
district
and
then,
as
we've
mentioned
already,
we
do
have
the
the
approval
of
the
barrio
latina
and,
throughout
the
the
whole
neighborhood.
M
M
Obviously,
affordable
housing
is
a
big
subject
right
now
we
recognize
that,
and
so
this
this
will
be
the
largest
private
commitment
of
affordable
housing.
The
tampa
has
seen
today
325
units
of
affordable
housing.
They
will
be
80
on
120
median
income
units.
They
will
be
mixed
with
the
the
market
rate
and
that
represents
a
62
million
dollar
value
commitment.
So
that's
a
substantial
commitment
from
the
from
the
project
50
of
the
affordable
housing
units
will
be
delivered
before
we
even
start
using
the
bonus
density.
M
So
this
is
a
bonus
density,
related,
affordable
commitment
and
that
commitment
we
have,
we
have
sort
of
said
is.
We
will
not
wait
until
we
use
the
bonus
density.
We're
going
to
use
that
before
we
even
reach
the
bonus
density,
and
then
one
thing
to
realize
is
that
we
could
people
may
ask
why
don't
you
do
bonus
density
on
the
entire
project?
You
can
do
more
units,
you
can
do
everything
else
and
more
affordable.
Well,
the
reality
is
only
some
percentage
of
the
property
is
eligible
for
bonus.
M
We've
already
talked
a
little
bit
tonight
about
cras,
and
you
know,
as
has
been
in
large,
that
we
are
actually
in
four
different
cras
so
which
makes
this
a
very
interesting
project
in
some
respects,
but
I
think
it's
also
in
some
respects
good
news
too
right.
It
means
that
we
are
going
to
be
creating
new
development
in
four
different
cras
that
can
benefit
from
from
that
tax
influx,
we're
estimating
about
63
million
dollars
of
incremental
taxes
that
are
going
to
be
generated,
and
that's
just
through
the
expiration
dates
of
the
cras
today.
M
M
One
thing
also
that's
worth
mentioning
here
is
the
number
of
jobs
that
our
project's
going
to
create.
This
is
not
at
all
residential
development.
M
M
You
know.
The
good
news
is
tampa's
really
emerged
recently
as
a
major
innovation
market,
there's
been
a
20
increase
in
stem
jobs
in
the
last
five
years.
We're
getting
calls
already
like.
When
are
you
gonna?
When
you
guys
gonna
have
office
space
ready
and
gas
works?
We
wanna
come
to
gas
works
office.
Tenants,
brokers,
corporations
have
all
starting
to
realize
they
want
to
be
in
a
20-minute
community.
They
want
to
be
in
those
places
where
their
their
employees
can
walk
out.
The
door
go
to.
M
You
create
that
mixed-use
environment
and
it
really
starts
to
draw
the
jobs
that
then
support
the
people
who
want
to
live
in
the
area,
and
we
think
gas
works
will
do
that
really
well
and
we're
already
seeing
signs
of
it
from
from
people
approaching
us,
and
the
pda
really
allows
us
the
flexibility
as
well
to
increase
the
amount
of
office
so
to
the
extent
that
that
office
market
really
becomes
strong
in
the
area,
we
can
start
to
increase
and
reduce
the
amount
of
residential,
and
I
just
threw
in
a
few
few
comments
here-
a
few
quotes
from
from
recent
reports
from
uli
and
jll,
but
it
really
reinforces
that
point.
M
Office.
Tennis
today
are
really
looking
for
those
amenity-rich
neighborhoods.
What
we
really
want
to
focus
on,
bringing
in
you
know,
jobs
and
and
retail,
and
all
these
exciting
things.
We
also
want
to
really
make
sure
we
sort
of
honor
the
the
tradition
of
ebola
city
in
terms
of
its
sort
of
entrepreneurialism,
the
local
businesses,
the
artists
and
the
makers
that
already
exist
in
the
area.
So
we're
definitely
going
to
make
sure
we
have
small
spaces
included
in
our
retail.
M
For
example,
flexible
spaces
where
startup
companies
can
go
where
artists
can
go
and
really
allow
those
those
businesses
to
grow
and
and
sort
of
you
know
really
that's
sort
of
beneficial
for
us
when
you
think
about
it.
If
a
business
can
do
well
as
a
startup,
then
they
can
grow.
We
can
recent.
Let's
leave
some
larger
space.
M
We
also
want
to
really
sort
of
you
know,
embrace
the
public
art
scene.
That's
already
in
ebar.
Daryl
shaw
is
going
to
talk
next
and
you
know:
daryl's
already
been
heavily
involved
in
many
sort
of
art
related
projects
throughout
ebor,
the
meat
yard
crest
building.
So
we
want
to
coordinate
with
folks
who
are
sort
of
operating
in
those
buildings,
really
sort
of
use
that
resource
and
and
bring
it
into
gas
works
and
and
one
of
the
simple
ways
you
could
think
about
that
is
just
through
public
art.
M
You
know
we
think,
there's
great
opportunities,
we're
gonna
this
project's
gonna
last
a
long
time
we're
gonna
have
a
lot
of
vacant
sites.
We're
gonna
have
a
need
for
some
screening
signage,
the
substation
site.
That's
right
across
from
the
warehouse.
You
know
there's
lots
of
ways
we
can.
We
can
use
the
artist
community
so
with
that
I'd
like
to
hand
it
over
to
to
daryl.
E
1988
I
graduated
from
college
and
moved
down
to
ybor
city.
I
lived
above
what
was
the
greco
hardware
store?
It
was
on
the
corner
of
8th
avenue
and
15th
street.
At
the
time
it
was
west
of
the
moon
studios
below
today.
It's
rock
brothers
brewery,
a
friend
of
mine
and
myself
purchased
a
small
building
on
7th
avenue
which
we
were
going
to
renovate
into
office
space
and,
prior
to
beginning
renovation,
it
was
guava
ween.
E
I
invited
my
family
to
come
and
watch
the
parade
and
we
stood
on
the
balcony
and
watched
the
you
know
the
thousands
of
people
below
in
the
the
parade
go
by
it
ended
uneventfully.
We
went
home
two
weeks
later,
precisely
two
weeks
later,
at
five
am
on
a
sunday
morning.
I
got
a
call
from
the
police
that
said
you
own
this
building
on
7th
avenue.
E
I
said
yes,
they
said
well,
you
better
get
down
here
quickly
because
it's
lying
in
the
middle
of
the
street,
the
balcony
that
all
12
of
my
family
members
and
I
were
on
collapsed
by
itself
in
the
wee
hours
of
a
sunday
morning.
We
did
not
know
whether
or
not
there
was
anybody
underneath
we
spent
the
day
clearing
the
rubble.
Thank
god
nobody
was
below
and
although
we
had
a
complete
economic
loss,
I
I
look
back
and
am
so
thankful
for
how
lucky
we
were
to
escape
the
significant
tragic
event.
E
It
ended
the
real
real
estate
career,
I
went
back
to
school
and
it
wasn't
until
a
handful
of
years
ago
that
I
rekindled
my
interest
in
ybor
city.
I
I
met
some
property
owners
in
ibor,
the
bachmann
family,
the
capitano
family,
the
guayareta
family.
E
It's
a
holistic
view,
it's
not
a
focus
on
an
individual
property.
It
begins
with
bringing
people
lots
of
people
to
live
in
the
district.
That
is
a
key
element
it.
It
is
looking
at
green
space
and
public
parks.
It
looks
at
landscaping
plans.
It
looks
like
it
needs
to
look
at
bike
paths
and
and
walkability
it's
reconnecting
the
grid.
It
is
looking
at
diversity
from
an
economic,
a
business
interest,
diversity
of
economic
base,
a
diversity
of
population
and
a
diversity
of
housing,
and
so
we
have.
E
We
have
very
significant
plan
and
vision
for
eboard
that
will
unfold
over
a
number
of
years
by
far
the
most
significant,
but
not
the
only
component
of
it
is
the
gas
works
plan,
and
so
I
I've
had
the
honor
to
to
partner
with
with
ketler
they've,
been
amazing
partners
thus
far,
and
we
are
very
very
excited
about
what
gas
works
will
do
for
ebor,
for
the
people
of
eboard,
for
the
city
of
tampa
and
for
the
tampa
bay
area.
So
we
thank
you
for
your
kind
consideration
this
evening.
A
All
right
at
this
time,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
we
will
take
public
comment.
I
asked
that
if
you
were
going
to
speak
to,
please
form
a
line.
My
left,
your
right
when
mr
hudson
requested.
Ladies
and
gentlemen,
please
pay
attention
to
me
when
mr
hudson
requested
that
these
items
be
moved
before
others
on
the
agenda.
A
C
Richard
gosmer,
it's
an
honor
to
be
here
today,
we're
witnessing
history
repeating
itself
when,
once
upon
a
time
in
1900,
there
were
three
thousand
residences
where
tens
of
thousands
people
would
call
ebor
city
home
where
they
worked,
they
shopped
they
dined
and
they
played
they
would
walk
along
the
streets
in
a
time
where
they
used
street
cars
and
bicycles,
there,
weren't
cars
and
sadly,
my
family,
the
columbia.
Restaurant,
is
the
last
of
those
from
the
golden
era
that
was
started
actually
in
1903
and
december
17th.
C
C
C
We're
going
to
put
a
sicilian
market
there
at
the
navier,
it's
under
construction,
we're
going
to
have
segundo
central
where
once
royal
palm
was
baking
bread,
so
people
could
see
it
so
they
could
walk
to
pick
up
their
bread
and
that
avira
coffee
will
be
roasting
and
going
through
the
through
the
air
and
that
you'll
be
able
to
feel
that
history.
I
created
something
called
cafe:
collection
at
the
airport
that
was
named
the
best
new
coffee
concept
in
the
country
number
five
in
the
world.
C
C
I
know
he
is
and
I'm
grateful
to
daryl
shaw
in
the
teens
putting
together.
I
just
can't
wait.
I'm
going
to
stay
here.
My
children
will
be
here,
we're
going
to
be
providing
jobs
until
the
north
is
city
will
exist.
Affordable
housing
is
important
where,
like
we
did,
the
sicilians,
the
spanish,
the
cubans
african-americans
we
work
side
by
side
and
that's
what
it's
going
to
take.
Ybor
city
will
reunite
the
citizens
of
this
great
community
on
behalf
of
our
family
and
everybody.
God
bless
each
one
of
you.
Thank
you.
Q
Good
evening,
council
members,
I'm
janet
scherberger,
president
of
walk
bike
tampa
and
I'm
speaking
in
support
of
this
project
on
behalf
of
the
entire
walk
bike
tampa
board,
we
met
with
the
developers
and
we
were
struck
by
their
genuine
commitment
to
community
engagement
and
collaboration.
We
were
also
really
struck
by
the
project
itself.
In
fact,
a
few
of
us
were
literally
brought
to
tears
by
what
we
saw.
What
can
I
say?
Q
We
are
just
complete
transportation
and
urban
trent
urban
planning
nerds
in
many
aspects,
the
vision
for
gas
works
dovetails
with
our
vision
for
a
more
walkable
bikeable
city.
It
prioritizes
people
over
parking
and
therefore
cars.
That's
a
philosophy
we'd
like
to
see
embraced,
city-wide
some
noteworthy
elements,
an
abundance
of
shade
trees,
rather
than
palms,
which
makes
a
really
big
difference
for
people
when
you're
walking
out
in
the
florida
sun.
Q
The
plans
to
narrow
vehicle
lanes
on
existing
streets,
which
slows
down
cars
and
makes
the
streets
safer
for
people
on
bikes
and
people
who
are
walking
the
10
foot
wide
multi-use
trails
that
make
it
easy
for
people
to
walk
side
by
side
or
pass
each
other
easily.
There's
also
the
streetcar
stop
and
the
parks
and
the
pedestrian
promenade.
Q
We
hope
this
district
does
not
become
an
island
and
that
the
city
will
continue
to
create
connections
friendly
to
people
who
choose
not
to
drive
cars
between
our
neighborhoods
and
economic
senators
centers
and
would
rather
go
by
transit
on
foot
or
by
bike
between
usf
ebor
gas
works,
water
street,
downtown
midtown,
west
shore
and
the
airport.
A
walk
bike
tampa
looks
forward
forward
to
seeing
this
project
come
out
of
the
ground,
and
we
urge
you
to
vote
in
support
of
it.
Thank
you.
E
Think
this
represents.
I
B
I
B
I
I
A
R
R
R
I'm
actually
here
today
this
evening
to
actually
speak
to
you,
not
not
in
either
of
those
roles,
but
as
a
public
developer
and
as
a
practitioner
of
sustainable
development
and
community
building,
and
in
my
capacity
in
both
of
those
roles,
you
know
it's
rare,
that
we
get
a
chance
to
actually
see
a
project
like
this
that
employs
all
of
the
tenets
of
best
practices,
from
sustainability
to
walkability
connectability
and
my
most
important
one
diverse
in
both
uses
as
well
as
incomes.
R
So
it's
very
pleasing
to
see
a
pr
project
like
this
take
place
right
across
from
encore,
and
I
have
to
give
the
developers
credit.
You
know
you
know
you're
in
a
good
neighborhood
when
neighbors
come
and
knock
on
your
door
before
you
go
and
knock
on
their
door
and
ask
what's
you
know
going
on
and
over
two
years
ago
now
they've,
they
came
to
me
as
the
tampa
housing
authority
and
for
two
years
now
they've
been
sharing
this
plan
as
it
has
evolved.
R
We
have
been
able
to
actually
collaborate
on
how
these
two
communities
will
not
become
isolated
from
one
another,
but
will
be
connected
to
one
another
with
roadways
as
well
as
compatible
uses
as
well
as
densities.
So
we've
actually
been
able
to
put
our
planners
on
lots
that
are
going
to
be
facing
their
development
with
their
development
team,
so
that
there's
some
great
similarities
in
symmetry
across
nebraska
avenue,
which
is
very
important
for
encore
having
private
sector
developers
engaged
in
providing
affordable
housing
is
so
very
crucial
for
our
city.
R
That
does
not
happen
in
tampa
often,
and
we've
got
to
create
the
mechanisms
to
allow
a
lot
more
of
that
to
happen.
So
when
a
project
like
this
is
going
to
be
delivering
325,
affordable
units,
you
know
it
is,
it
is
a
incredible
opportunity
for
low
income
people
to
be
able
to
live
work,
recreate
in
a
very
high
amenitized
area
and
lower
their
their
cost
of
living,
not
just
from
affordable
housing,
but
being
able
to
reduce
their
reliance
on
automobile
transportation
as
well.
B
Good
evening
city,
council
members,
my
name
is
lee
bell,
I'm
president
and
ceo
of
the
ybor
city
chamber
of
commerce.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
before
you
this
evening.
On
behalf
of
the
ybor
city
chamber
of
commerce.
We
would
like
to
offer
our
support
for
the
gasworks
development
master
plan.
B
It
is
crucial
to
mention
that
gas
works
will
provide
better
connectivity
and
mobility
in
the
city,
making
one
of
the
most
walkable
neighborhoods
with
priority,
giving
to
pedestrians
and
bike
traffic.
We
believe
the
proposed
mixed-use
development
will
be
a
great
contribution
to
ybor
city
and
the
entire
tampa
bay
region.
B
M
Hey
there,
my
name
is
max.
S
Chillera
I'm
a
resident
of
ybor
city,
I
own
a
house
there
and
I'm
a
business
owner.
I
own
chill
bros
ice
cream.
B
This
city,
as
well
as
the
you
know,
the
historical
components,
the.
Q
I
guess
you
know
from
there.
Let
me
just
regain
where
I'm
at
here.
E
Is
just
this
development
is,
is
something
I'm
very
excited
about.
It's
it's
gonna
boost
the
amount
of
jobs.
It's
gonna
boost
the
amount
of
traffic
that
we
get
in
our
ebor
city,
and
you
know
ultimately
that
that
means
a
lot
for
small
businesses
up
and
coming
businesses.
E
J
A
E
B
B
I've
spent
more
than
a
year,
volunteering
at
booker
t
washington,
elementary
school
and
it's
a
meaningful
engagement,
because
my
great
grandfather
was
a
teacher
and
principal
at
booker.
T
washington
in
the
1930s
and
40s
reading
to
kids
at
the
school
allows
me
to
carry
on
the
legacy
of
my
grandfather
and
the
numerous
educators
in
my
family.
B
To
me,
this
is
a
small
but
telling
aspect
about
the
man
and
the
people
behind
the
project
legacy
matters
to
them.
Community
matters
to
them.
It's
the
attention
given
to
these
details
that
lead
me
to
support
gas
works,
mr
shaw
and
his
team.
When
you
talk
about
legacy
and
community,
you
have
to
talk
about
inclusion.
B
A
Q
R
Try
to
keep
it
short
for
you.
My
name
is
frank
delagrano
and
I'm
here
in
support
of
the
gasworks
project.
To
give
you
a
background
on
myself,
I'm
a
fourth
generation.
B
Licotta
opened
la
mecha
cafe
on
in
1920,
where
the
truest
building
now
sits
on
7th
avenue
across
the
street.
From
that
my
grandfather,
frank
de
la
grande,
opened
delagrana
tourism
and
travel
and
tourism,
which
was
caddy
corner
from
that.
B
His
law
practice
in
the
building
where
my
grandfather
started,
his
travel
agency
and
I've
lived
in
abort
city
for
five
years,
and
it's
a
part
of
me.
I
I
love
you
both
all
my
heart.
R
B
B
Hello
and
thank
you
for
having
me
speak
today.
My
name
is
nicole
rodriguez
and
I
am
the
owner
of
ybor
city
laundry
brought
on
the
bay
and
los
chapo's
tacos,
all
of
which
are
located
in
front
of
the
former
tampa
park.
Housing
projects
off
7th
avenue
and
scott
street
los
chapos
tacos
started
as
a
tiny
little
food
truck
with
just
two
employees.
It
has
since
grown
to
a
woman-owned
business
with
over
30
employees
across
three
locations.
B
B
Gas
gasworks,
the
50-acre
mixed-use
site,
would
have
a
far-reaching
positive
impact
attracting
other
investors
and
transforming
small
shops
into
sustainable,
lasting
businesses.
It
would
complement
the
neighborhood's,
authentic
character,
honoring,
the
rich
historic
architecture
of
ybor
city,
while
redeveloping
abandoned
buildings
and
underutilized
lots.
But
that's
not
all.
I
believe
the
proposed
location
would
fill
the
gap
between
the
historic
district
and
the
new
water
street.
Since
my
arrival,
much
of
the
buildings
in
the
neighborhood
have
been
vacant,
I'd
like
to
help
bring
life
back
to
ebor.
The
revitalization
effort
would
be
remarkable.
B
It
would
help
the
area
prepare
for
future
growth.
The
developers
commitment
to
providing
325,
affordable
housing
units
would
add
density
to
the
community.
Currently,
there
are
no
apartments
close
by
many
of
my
employees
live
outside
of
ebor
some
up
to
45
minutes
away,
though
they
would
definitely
move
to
ibor
if
they
could.
The
proposed
development
would
make
this
possible.
B
When
I
first
heard
about
gas
works,
it
was
taco
tuesday,
and
a
fox
13
news
anchor
asked
me
to
do
an
interview
about
how
the
development
would
affect
my
restaurant.
All
I
could
think
about
was
how
great
this
project
could
be
and
how
incredible
it
would
be
to
support
housing
choices
and
affordability
and
strengthen
the
community.
B
Bringing
gas
works
into
eboard
would
be
amazing
not
only
for
my
business,
but
for
everyone
in
the
area.
Armature
works
was
a
success,
sparkman
wharf
2.,
and
there
is
no
doubt
in
my
mind
that
the
gas
works
would
be
just
as
successful.
Tampa
is
growing
quickly
and
we
need
to
grow
with
our
city
in
order
to
thrive.
Gas
works
would
make
this
possible.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration.
R
So
I
not
need
repeat
any
of
what
has
already
been
said,
but
knowing
the
partners
that
darrell
shaw
has
put
together
many
of
them
that
are
here
outstanding
citizens
of
this
community
supporting
this
project.
I
echo
the
totality
of
what
has
been
presented
to
you
50
years
ago.
As
a
young
elected
prosecuting
attorney,
I
saw
something
changing
in
my
native
city.
R
R
R
F
E
Well,
thank
you
very
much
for
the
very
detailed
presentation
I'm
also
born
and
raised
in
tampa.
My
family
does
not
have
ebor
city
history,
sadly,
because
they,
my
mother
and
grandparents,
came
from
cuba
in
1961.
E
So
I'm
very
happy
to
support
it
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
you
know
it's
it's
going
to
be
transformational
in
ways
that
you
can
see
the
renderings,
but
until
we
see
it
and
we
can
walk
the
streets.
This
is
something
that
we
need,
along
with
water
street,
with
happening
in
the
channel
district
in
tampa
heights.
This
is
going
to
complete
that
puzzle.
So
thank
you
to
mr
shaw
for
your
vision
and
all
his
partners,
everybody.
E
C
Miranda,
thank
you
very
much,
mr
chairman.
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
each
and
every
one
of
you
you
know
I
was.
I
had
the
pleasure,
the
honor
and
the
luck
really
to
be
born
in
ybor
city
and
there's
nothing
else.
In
fact,
my
first
racehorse
that
I
ever
bred,
I
named
him
eboor
city
charlie
and
he
never
won
a.
C
So
what
I'm
saying
is,
thank
you
all
of
you
for
who
you
are
and
what
you've
done.
Ebor
city
did
demise,
but
it
was
just
more
than
one
thing
in
my
opinion.
Anyway,
it
was
certainly
when
the
cigar
factories
became
dormant,
that
cigar
industry
left
and
those
people
that
started
the
factories
that
worked
in
the
factories
they're
also
left
by
age.
I
guess
and
when
their
kids
got
educated,
they
found
a
better
job
than
what
they
had
before
that
their
parents
have
and
they
moved
out.
C
C
In
my
opinion,
I'm
still
a
teenager,
but
it
ain't.
How
you
look
is
how
you
feel
so,
I'm
getting
kind
of
old,
but
I
thank
you
all
for
what
you've
done.
This
would
be
the
the
ending
strap
of
a
city,
because
now
you've
got
development
where
it
used
to
be
la
draga
and
ej
will
tell
you
what
the
la
zaraga
was
and
then
you
have
development
where
you
used
to
be
in
tampa
heights
that
you
had
a
bridge
there,
that
two
individuals
would
turn
it
around,
and
people
forgot
that
that
bridge
is
there.
C
Now
that
goes
over
the
river
was
not
there.
There
was
another
one,
it
was
wooden.
I
think
when
I
was
a
kid,
but
those
things
are
forgotten.
So
when
you
see
all
that
and
you
you
see
it
coming
back
and
things
have
changed,
it
just
got
more
modern
because
everybody
used
to
walk
no
one.
In
ybor
city,
I
don't
in
cars
you
had
maybe
10
cars
where
I
lived,
that
was
a
square
mile
and
there
was
horses
in
ybor
city.
There
was
cows,
there
was
goats.
C
Certainly
it
doesn't
look
like
it
used
to,
but
it
looks
much
better
and
I
think,
when
you
finish
this
here
tampa
would
be
the
envy
of
no
city
in
any
part
of
the
united
states
of
america.
It'd
be
better
than
any
one
of
them
because
it's
got
it's
got.
The
port
got
the
airport,
it's
got
different
cultures,
different
fields,
different
flavors-
and
I
remember
going
many
times
to
the
fountain
blue
hotel.
Just
to
go,
see
tropical
and
I'll.
Tell
you
one
day
about
tropical.
I
know
y'all
are
falling
asleep
because
you're
older
than
I
am.
C
H
T
If
you
don't
mind
I'll,
say
I'll
just
say
something
fast,
a
lot
of
very
important
people
in
the
room,
people
of
great
character,
who
have
contributed
a
lot
to
our
community
over
the
years
and
and
and
also
people
a
great
vision
and-
and
I
just
want
to
thank
everybody
for
their
participation.
T
The
easiest
cases
for
us
to
handle
the
best
cases
are
when
a
group
takes
their
time
to
really
understand
a
community
meet
with
all
the
different
constituents
and
stakeholders
and
also
the
city
and
work
out
all
the
issues
and
this
this
group,
as
as
we've
watched,
have
taken
their
time
and
they've
met
with
everybody
and
not
of
all
the
people
in
the
room.
T
I
guess
we
don't
have
a
single
one,
that's
opposed
to
it,
but
I
want
to
thank
everybody
for
their
vision
and
everything
that
they've
contributed
to
our
community
and
also,
I
will
say,
without
any
influence
on
how
I'll
vote
my
my
kids
well,
my
favorite
flavor
at
chill
bros
is
guava
pasolito
and
my
kids
love
that
place.
They
perked
up
here
behind
me
when
you
started
talking
about
it
and
my
other
great
ice
cream.
Flavor
is
the
chocolate
over
at
ulele,
so
we'll
talk
about
food
later.
Thank
you.
G
So
I'm
just
hoping
that
when
we
do
these
developments,
we
remember
who
used
to
live
there
and
we
we
keep
the
faith
of
keeping
it
inclusionary,
making
sure
that
everyone
has
a
place
to
be
able
to
go
and
say.
I
know
it
was
there
once
before,
but
we're
still
allowed
to
come
here.
We're
part
of
the
project
we're
part
of
the
atmosphere
here
you
have
to
have
that
because
I
can
remember
my
mom
used
to
take
me
down
the
board,
see
the
doctor
pardo.
G
That
was
most
of
the
black
doc
black
kids
doctor,
dr
pardo,
and
what
about
four
or
five
months
ago.
I
think
I
met
his
son.
We
were
down
there
for
the.
I
think
we
know
you
were
there.
We
can't
introduce
dr
the
son
of
dr
pardo.
We
were
down
there
for
the
ribbon,
cutting
remember
so
you
had
hispanic
people
italian
people,
everybody
down
in
ebor
black
people,
so
that
area
was
a
area
for
everybody,
so
I'm
just
hoping
when
it
comes
back
when
you
bring
it
back
alive.
G
G
Q
Thank
you
very
much,
sir,
and
thank
you
so
much
to
everybody.
A
B
For
not
being
there
live,
I'm
actually
in
city
hall,
but
I
had
covet
and
I
have
a
lot
of
coughing
going
on,
so
I
didn't
think
it
proper
to
be
in
the
room,
but
I'm
negative,
thank
god.
But
I
just
wanted
to
thank
everybody
for
coming
out.
I'm
on
on
this
on
cases
like
this.
It's
it's
great
to
see
a
moral
purpose
combined
then
with
something
that
is
legally
sufficient,
but
before
us
that
that
issue
of
legal
sufficiency,
I
think,
speaks
for
itself.
B
B
Who's
had
family
for
generations
in
tampa
has
had
connections
to
reborn
city.
I
know
I
certainly
have
my
paternal
grandfather
lived
there
for
a
little
bit,
gosh,
probably
90
100
years
ago,
and
other
family
members
and
ybor
city
is
where
so
many
of
us
have
come
through
and
to
have
a
project
like
this.
That
affirms
the
history
of
ybor
city
through
through
giants
that
that
means
so
much
to
ybor
city.
I
think
just
means
a
lot
to
this
council,
so
I'll
speak
for
myself
that
it
is
something
that
I'm
proud
to
support.
B
I
know
that
in
doing
this,
we
trust
that
you
know
certain
values
will
be
kept
in
this
project
and
and
I
feel
that
they
will
so.
I
just
wanted
to
thank
everybody
for
all
the
hard
work
in
this.
It's
been,
it's
been
a
pleasure
to
listen
to
this.
Thank
you
very
much.
J
I
will
echo
my
support
for
this
project.
We
hear
a
lot
on
this
council
of
new
projects
of
projects
that
want
to
come
and
they
they
want
to
get
the
feel
of
tampa
and
every
single
one
of
them
mentions.
Ibor.
Everyone
mentions
the
history
of
ibore,
bringing
the
history
of
tampa,
and
the
history
of
tampa
really
means
the
history
of
ibore.
It's
ibor
is
where
everything
started.
J
It
is
really
brave,
but
I
think,
with
the
partnership
that
you
have
and
the
vision
and
what
we're
seeing
very
excited
to
see
what
comes
of
this-
and
I
would
be
remiss
if
I
didn't
say
that
my
favorite
thing
about
how
you
presented
this
project
was
how
I
never
saw
a
car
in
it,
and
I
just
think
that's
really
wonderful
in
the
fact
that
we
are
really
trying
to
connect
those
different
parts
of
this
city
and
how
we
can
do
that
in
a
way
that
doesn't
require
a
car,
because
to
get
downtown
from
ebor
doesn't
really
take
that
long
it.
J
Actually.
I
have
found
that
it
takes
much
longer
in
a
car
from
here
to
get
the
e-board
than
it
does
just
to
hop
on
the
street
car.
So
that
is
what
I
generally
do
and
I
need
to
go
down
to
ebor
during
the
day.
So
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
for
that.
I
appreciate
and
look
forward
to
how
this
project
develops.
A
H
B
B
All
right,
okay,
this
is
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading
consideration:
an
ordinance,
rezoning
property
general
vicinity
of
920
gamalin
court,
1400,
north
channel
side
drive
717
and
802
north
12th
street
1302,
1307
1405.
B
in
1417,
east
2nd
avenue,
1301,
1306,
1419,
east
4th
avenue,
1205
and
1315
east
5th
avenue
and
1302
and
1402
north
15th
street
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida,
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
ig
industrial
general
pd
plan
development,
yc2,
igbor
city,
residential
yc6,
community,
commercial,
yc9,
ybor
city
plan
development,
ih,
industrial,
heavy
and
rm
24
residential
multifamily.
The
pda
planned
development,
alternative
nyc,
nine,
ignore
city
plan,
development,
residential
multi-family
and
commercial
uses,
providing
an
effective
day.
H
E
A
C
The
resolution
of
the
bonus
provision
agreement
and
the
the
development
agreement
will
be
you'll
move
those
on
august
25th.
Thank.
A
A
C
D
E
D
Yes,
thank
you
so
much
council
lashawn
doc
development
coordination.
This
is
item
number
five
rec
21
134.
This
is
for
the
property
located
at
3915
west
euclid
avenue.
The
applicant
is
being
represented
by
jim
porter.
The
request
is
to
rezone
the
property
from
rs
60,
residential
single
family
to
pd
plan
development,
and
it
is
for
residential
single-family
detached
in
the
creation
of
two
lots.
So
I'll
turn
it
over
to
the
planning,
commission
and
I'll
come
back
and
get
my
report
after.
Thank
you.
T
Danny
collins,
again
with
the
atlanta
commission's
staff,
have
been
sworn
in.
Our
next
case
is
within
the
south,
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically
in
the
virginia
park.
Neighborhood
clark
circle
park
is
the
closest
public
recreation
facility
being
located
quarter
mile
to
the
northeast
of
the
site.
The
closest
transit
stop
is
located
60
feet
west
of
the
site
at
the
intersection
of
west
euclid
avenue
and
south
grady
avenue
subject.
Site
is
within
a
level
a
evacuation
zone.
T
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject's
site
and
surrounding
properties.
You'll
see
the
subject's
site
is
just
east
of
the
intersection
of
west
euclid
and
south
grady
avenue
surrounding
areas
predominantly
residential
in
character,
with
with
the
majority
of
the
residents
being
single
family
detached
here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
The
subject
site
is
within
the
residential
ten
designation,
it's
surrounded
by
the
residential
tent
on
all
sides.
T
Planet,
commission
staff
has
reviewed
the
application,
found
no
adverse
impacts
to
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
This
portion
of
west
euclid
avenue
has
an
existing
density
of
5.38
units
per
acre.
The
pd
proposes
6.45
units
per
acre,
which
is
comparable
to
the
existing
block
density.
T
T
T
The
comprehensive
plan
recognizes
the
importance
of
single-family
neighborhoods
and
seeks
to
promote
a
compatible
redevelopment
of
neighborhoods
to
ensure
economic
health
and
that
an
adequate
amount
of
land
is
planned
for
the
city's
growing
population.
The
rezoning
will
provide
additional
infill
development
on
an
underutilized
parcel
within
the
south
tampa
planning
district
based
on
those
considerations.
The
planet,
commission
staff
finds
a
request
consistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
This
concludes
my
presentation
available
for
any
questions.
D
Thank
you
so
much
council
lashawn
doc
development
coordination.
The
request
before
you
is
to
allow
the
creation
of
two
lots
with
residential
single
family
detached
uses.
The
the
site
contains
13
860
square
feet.
The
subject
site
consists
of
lots:
74
and
75
of
belmar
revised
unit
number
six
subdivision
which
was
planted
and
I'm
1989.
D
D
So
this
is
the
ariel
of
the
site.
This
is
the
site
that's
outlined
in
red.
This
is
euclid
avenue
on
the
map.
This
is
south
dale
mabry.
This
is
kensington
avenue.
So
this
is
the
property
located
here
and
you
can
see
I'll
show
you
in
the
analysis
map
what
was
considered
as
part
of
the
conforming
map
and
considered
in
the
as
part
of
the
analysis
which
was
completed.
But
you
can
see
the
single
families
on
that
list.
That
exists
is
predominant
in
the
neighborhood.
D
So
this
is
the
conforming
map
which
was
created.
I
can
give
you
the
analysis,
but
I
just
wanted
to
explain
for
a
moment.
So
this
is
the
property,
the
subject
property
under
the
request,
which
is
has
the
patterned
and
it's
outlined
in
black.
This
is
euclid
avenue.
This
is
septo
mabry.
This
is
kensington
el
prado.
D
So
what
we
did
was
it
took
the
look
took
a
look
at
the
blocks
and
you
can
see
when
you
look
at
this
quadrant,
I'm
just
going
to
cover
this
up,
just
to
be
able
to
show
the
two
quadrants
and
the
two
subdivisions
which
were
considered
for
the
analysis.
So
this
is
one
quadrant
and
you
can
see
the
pattern.
This
is
the
subject
site
the
lots
that
exist
there.
This
pattern
of
development
here
and
the
block,
and
then
this
is
your
other
quadrant
here.
D
D
Your
blue
has
your
lot
width
of
50
to
54
feet
in
width
and
your
red
is
your
80
to
99,
but
just
to
show
you
so
this
analysis
did
not
cross
euclid
south
of
euclid
is
a
different
block
pattern
and
I'll
show
you
on
the
map,
because
what
I
did
was
run
the
analysis
just
to
show
you
that
area,
so
south
of
euclid
was
not
included
in
the
analysis,
but
you
can
see
the
block
pattern
that
exists.
D
D
So
within
the
staff
report
on
page
four,
the
staff
report,
it
contains
the
analysis
which
I'll
just
review
in
part
regarding
the
block
itself.
So
in
relation
to
reviewing
the
existing
development
pattern,
the
subject
block
on
the
north
side
of
euclid
avenue
from
south
grady
avenue
to
west
tampa
circle
contains
four
total
zoning
lots,
including
the
subject
site.
So
all
four
100
percent
of
those
lots
have
been
developed
with
the
width
of
60
feet
or
greater.
D
The
block
face
on
the
north
side
of
west
euclid
from
east
clark
avenue
to
south
grady
avenue,
contains
100
of
the
lots,
having
developed
with
the
lot
width
greater
than
60
feet.
The
block
face
of
south
grady
from
west
kensington
avenue
to
west
euclid
avenue
contains
11
total
zoning,
lots,
nine
or
82
percent
of
those
lots
have
been
developed
with
the
width
of
60
feet
or
greater
two
or
18
have
been
developed,
with
a
width
of
59.99
or
less
so.
D
Pursuant
to
the
analysis,
the
majority
of
the
lots
within
the
study
area
have
been
developed
with
a
lot
width
consistent
with
rs-60
zoning.
Therefore,
staff
finds
the
re-establishment
of
the
planet,
lots
to
be
inconsistent
with
the
existing
development
pattern
of
the
block,
as
well
as
the
surrounding
area,
and
I
have
the
site
plan
to
show
you
that
was
submitted.
D
D
D
D
So
the
development
review
committee
reviewed
the
request,
found
the
request
inconsistent,
and
this
is
based
upon
the
analysis
conducted
by
development
coordination.
I'm
also
counsel.
There
are
modifications
required
to
the
site
plan
between
first
and
second
reading.
Should
council
approve
the
request?
This
concludes
staff's
presentation.
I'm
available.
If
you
have
any
questions,
any
questions.
Q
Jim
porter,
with
acreman
401
east
jackson
street,
I'm
here
representing
the
applicant
tonight,
the
request
before
you
as
staff
indicated,
is
to
restore
the
original
plating,
which
I'm
going
to
show
you
on
the
record.
This
is
from
1989
and
you
can
see
this.
This
is
the
subject
property
and
it
was
originally
planted
as
two
lots,
one
with
the
width
of
55
feet
and
one
with
60,
but
it
was
developed
as
a
single
lot.
So
the
goal
tonight
is
to
restore
this
back
to
the
original
plat.
Q
We
originally
tried
to
do
this
administratively,
because
there's
plenty
of
room
as
far
as
the
lot
itself.
As
staff
said,
the
law
itself
is
13
feet.
The
zoning
cabinet,
the
underlying
zoning
category-
requires
a
lot
size
of
6
000
square
feet,
so
we're
easily
able
to
create
two
lots
of
the
size.
That's
conforming
with
the
zoning.
One
lot
would
be
6
623
feet
and
the
other
lot
would
be
7
250
feet.
Q
There
are
two
elements,
two
main
elements
when
you
consider
a
lot
the
lot
size
and
street
frontage,
and
so
this
is
the
issue
here.
One
of
our
sites
could
meet
the
street
funded
at
60
feet,
the
other
one's
off
by
five
feet.
So
we're
really
talking
a
difference
of
five
feet.
Had
we
had
sufficient
street
coverage,
this
would
have
been
an
administrative
approval
and
not
before
council.
Q
The
size
of
five
feet
is
not
significant
and
it
really
would
sort
of
serve
to.
As
this
planning
commission
stated
on
the
record
to
utilize
or
to
sort
of
take
advantage
of
an
underutilized
parcel.
It's
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
I
had
two
calls
from
neighbors
in
the
immediate
neighborhood
they
were
built
in
support
of
this.
I
believe
you
have
a
letter
in
the
record.
Also
of
someone
who
does
not
object.
Q
The
pattern
is,
I
think,
a
sort
of
a
mixed
pattern,
but
you
can
see
the
difference.
The
lot
now
is
is
large.
The
ones
on
either
side
are
each
60,
so
one
would
be
55,
which
is
like
the
blue,
and
one
would
be
like
this.
So
it's
consistent
with
a
pattern
compatible
with
the
neighborhood
and,
I
think,
would
serve
a
good
use
for
the
property
again.
Q
E
E
G
Number
five
rec
2134
orders
being
presented
for
first
reading
at
consideration
in
order
it's
resilient
property
in
general
of
3915
west
ukel
avenue
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida,
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning:
digital
application,
rs
60,
residential
single
family
to
pd,
plant
development,
residential
signal
family
detached
provide
an
effective
day.
Second,.
T
D
Yes,
council,
the
sean,
doc
development
coordination
and
council
item
number.
Nine
is
red:
2253
it's
for
the
property
located
at
3604,
west
azeal
street.
The
applicant
is
being
represented
by
brian
donovan,
and
the
request
is
to
rezone
the
property
from
rs
60,
residential
single
family
to
pd
plan
development
for
a
medical
office,
use
and
I'll
turn
it
over
to
the
planning
commission
and
do
their
report
and
I'll
come
back
and
give
mine.
Thank
you.
H
Same
thomas
with
your
planning
commission
staff,
this
is
located
in
the
south,
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
the
bonaire
neighborhood.
The
closest
train.
Stop
is
0.2
miles
away
to
the
west
at
west,
zeel,
street
and
south
del
mar
highway.
The
closest
recreational
facility
is
charles
b
williams
park
located
within
a
mile
to
the
northwest
of
the
site,
and
the
site
is
located
within
a
level
c
evacuation
zone.
H
Here's
an
ariel
of
the
site.
The
area
contains
a
mix
of
like
commercial
uses,
single
family
detached
single
attached
and
multi-family
uses.
You
can
see
the
multi-family
uses
over
here
to
the
east
of
the
site,
the
single
family,
detached
units
to
the
east
southeast
and
then
another
multi-family
development.
Here
north
of
the
site,
almost
zeal
street.
You
can
see
some
of
those
like
commercial
uses
and
then
north
of
the
site
and
as
well
as
south
of
the
site,
you
can
see
some
of
those
single
family
detached
homes.
J
H
That
designation
continues
north
of
zeal
and
west
on
down
a
zeal
when
you're
looking
north
and
south
of
zeel,
and
then
additionally
northeast
you
can
see
this
orange
color
that's
represent,
represents
the
residential
10
future
land
use
designation,
then
going
further
east
in
this
dark
brown
color.
That
is
the
residential
35
future
lane
juice
designation,
which
is
where
some
of
those
townhomes
and
multi-family
apartments
are
found
and
then
farther
to
your
southeast
and
this
pinkish
purple
color
is
the
cmu
35
designation
along
henderson
boulevard.
H
The
residential
20
designation
allows
for
the
consideration
of
limited
number
a
limited
number
of
neighborhood
serving
commercial
uses.
If
the
project
meets
locational
criteria,
planning,
commission
staff
has
reviewed
the
commercial
locational
criteria
and
finds
that
the
subject
site
meets
the
criteria
for
consideration.
The
subject
side
is
located
along
west
zeal
street,
which
is
designated
as
an
arterial
roadway.
Existing
non-residential
zoning
is
located
adjacent
to
the
subject
site
to
the
north
and
east,
while
additional
non-residential
zoning
is
located
further
west
along
western
zeal.
H
Street
new
commercial
development
and
significant
commercial
renovations
shall
be
encouraged
to
provide
sidewalks
in
areas
where
it's
practical
and
feasible
for
pedestrian-oriented
activities.
The
subject
site
has
provided
for
pedestrian
connections
from
the
main
entrance
to
the
public
sidewalks
along
west
to
zeal,
which
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
policy
plan
direction.
In
conclusion,
the
proposed
pd
further
is
the
intent
of
the
comprehensive
plan
and
is
comparable
compatible
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood
available
for
any
questions.
Any
questions
nope.
Thank
you
very
much.
D
Lashonda
development,
coordination
and
council-
this
item
is
before
you
today.
This
rezoning
request
to
construct
a
medical
office
building
containing
3868
square
feet.
This
is
a
one-story
structure
proposed.
If
I
can
show
you
the
zoning
map,
so
this
is
the
site
located
in
red.
This
is
on
west
brazil.
This
is
henderson
boulevard.
This
is
kennedy
to
orient
you
at
the
north
of
the
map.
D
So
this
site
is
located
here.
You
can
see
it's
surrounded
with
pd
zoning
as
you
look
along
west
of
zeal
street
there's
a
mixture,
but
when
you're
within
this
range
you
can
see,
there's
a
mixture
of
office
uses
commercial
neighborhood
scale
uses,
and
then
you
have
your
residential
single
family
zoning
with
some
scatterings
of
pd's
along
within
the
neighborhood
further
north.
D
This
is
the
site
plan,
provided
I
zoomed
in
and
blew
this
up,
but
I
took
away
the
street.
This
is
a
zill,
so
this
is
entrance
to
the
site.
So
this
is
the
structure.
That's
proposed:
that's
a
part
of
the
pd
site
plan
and
you
can
see
surface
parking
located
on
site
and
also
provided
is
your
walkway,
your
pedestrian
path,
providing
a
connection
to
the
sidewalk
along
on
azil,
and
I
have
pictures
of
the
site.
D
D
The
inconsistency
is
related
to
the
transportation,
related
comments
and
the
code
requirements,
and
also
there
are
revisions
required
to
the
site
plan
between
first
and
second
reading.
Should
council
decide
to
approve
the
application
I'm
available.
If
you
have
any
questions,
any
questions.
B
N
E
E
Q
E
Q
Q
A
general
overlay
of
the
site
is
three
point:
three,
three
acres:
it's
on
the
southwest
corridor
of
zeal
and
hines.
We've
included
an
aerial
from
google
earth
which
shows
the
mixed
use
of
the
area
going
to
the
current
uses.
The
subject
parcel
is
essentially
on
an
island.
The
surrounding
parcels
are
pds
on
either
the
left
or
right
of
the
parcel
on
the
zeal
street
behind
it.
I
believe
caddy
corner
would
be
another
pd
directly
forward
to
the
right.
Another
pd
we've
also
expanded
our
view
a
little
bit.
Q
Going
towards
dale
mabry
all
the
way
down
towards
south
tanz,
you
have
the
cat,
doctors,
the
tampo
plastic
surgery,
center
pediatric
health
care
alliance,
all
using
that
azil
street
corridor,
which
is
a
transferring
area.
It's
transitioning
to
this
commercial
and
medical
use,
as
shown
by
the
by
this
slide.
Q
Now
as
we
go
forward,
this
is
our
proposed
development.
This
is
the
plastic
surgery
center.
Dr
tracy
timmon
is
presence
in
the
audience,
as
well
as
her
son,
edward
they've,
been
patiently
waiting
to
to
see
this
dream
come
to
fruition
for
a
very
long
time.
What
they're
proposing
is
a
woman-owned
medical
and
office
building
we're
proposing
38-68
square
feet
pursuant
to
the
code
they're
allowed
to
go
as
far
up
as
7
290
square
feet
in
this
development
proposal.
We're
planning
on
two
operating
rooms
with
three
consultation
rooms.
Q
Q
We've
already
worked
to
make
the
revisions
to
the
site
plan
to
be
consistent
at
second
reading,
the
only
one
where
we're
asking
for
a
waiver
we're
asking
for
two
waivers:
the
first
waiver
we're
requesting
to
reduce
the
required
15
foot
buffer
and
the
six
foot
masonry
wall
requirement
to
a
three
foot
buffer
on
the
south
side.
Now
I've
tried
to
make
this
as
large
as
I
can
it's
included
in
our
application.
Q
The
council
will
note
the
stormwater
pond.
That's
been
included
in
the
site
overlay
when
you
zoom
into
it.
That's
where
the
three
foot
landscape
buffer
is
any
less
of
a
buffer
would
dramatically
impact
that
stormwater.
Pond.
Looking
to
the
adjacent
parcel,
3608
azeal,
the
council
will
note
a
14,
I
believe
it's
a
14
inch
camper
oak,
we've
designated
the
boundary
that's
required
for
this.
This
tree,
the
three
foot
buffer,
allows
the
adjacent
parcel
holder
to
essentially
fit
their
requirements
for
that
tree.
Q
Now,
since
we're
on
the
topic
of
trees,
there
is
an
additional
concern.
That's
been
noted
in
the
committee's
report,
which
is
a
three
inch
oak
on
an
adjacent
parcel.
At
this
juncture,
it
looks
like
there's
some
overlap
based
on
the
site
plan,
we're
not
sure
whether
it
will
be
affected
by
any
of
the
site
plans.
Despite
that,
we
have
reached
out
to
that
adjacent
parcel
owner
they've
indicated
they're
willing
to
cooperate
with
either
the
removal
by
signing
the
affidavit
that
natural
resources
has
requested.
Q
In
the
event,
it
does
need
to
be
removed,
obviously
that
affidavit
would
have
to
be
provided
prior
to
permitting
which
we
believe
we
can
comply
with
the
the
biggest
issue
and
the
biggest
hurdle
that
is
noted
in
the
staff
report
is
the
parking
waiver.
Now
the
site
plan
actually
shows
two
different
requirements
for
the
parking.
One
is
23
parking
spaces,
the
others
is
21
and
that's
calculated
using
two
ways.
One
this.
Q
This
parcel
can
be
used
for
three
thousand
feet
of
medical
building,
with
868
feet
being
designated
to
office
space
that
essentially
gets
us
to
our
21
required
parking
spaces.
If
the
full
site
plan
is
used
as
medical,
that's
where
the
23
parking
spaces
would
would
come
into
to
debate
this
waiver
request,
though
it's
for
a
unique
structure.
What
we're
dealing
with
is
a
medical
office
and
surgery
center.
It's
a
plastic
surgery
center,
where
the
parcel
owner
is
the
actual
occupant
of
the
building.
Q
They'll,
be
booking
and
scheduling,
appointments
and
consultations
for
plastic
surgery
procedures
with
full
knowledge
of
what
their
parking
can
handle.
Generally,
when
this
is
done,
follow-up
appointments
and
initial
consultations
are
all
done.
Virtually
alleviating
a
number
of
the
issues
that
something
like
an
urgent
care
would
run
into
with
parking.
This
is
booked
out
appointments
and
procedures
scheduled
well
in
advance
of
when
folks
will
be
coming.
Q
When
we
go
further,
we've
actually
studied
the
data
from
medical
office
building
and
based
on
the
parking
generation
manual.
This
is
the
fifth
edition.
It
shows
that
a
use,
at
least
at
this
juncture,
that
the
data
is
changing,
but
in
3.23
spaces
per
1000
square
feet
of
medical
office
building
news.
Now
we
will
need
even
less
than
that,
as
we've
indicated
on
our
slide,
there's
going
to
be
on
a
full
surgery
day,
a
staff
of
of
seven
that
fills
up
seven
parking
spots,
there's
two
operating
rooms.
Q
So
at
most
you
have
two
folks
who
are
coming
to
get
surgery.
That
day
generally,
those
patients
are
dropped
off.
They're,
not
driving
home
after
they've
been
placed
under
anesthesia,
so
those
parking
spots
would
be
not
in
use
and
still
available
to
the
public
at
large
again
because
of
the
earth
of
the
unique
footprint
the
unique
way
that
this
business
is
operated.
Q
This
scheduling
is
dynamic.
There's
not
going
to
be
walk-ins
for
a
plastic
surgery,
center
you're
going
to
have
things
that
are
scheduled
mindful
of
the
parking
not
allowing
overflow,
because
dr
timmin
can't
be
in
more
than
one
spot
now
going
further.
When
we
look
at
the
waiver,
it's
justified
again
by
the
operation
of
the
business
because
they
will
be
mindful
of
them
with
that
much
parking,
there
was
a
concern.
I
believe
transportation
voiced
it
dealing
with
an
overflow
of
parking
onto
his
yield
street.
Q
Given
the
footprint
that
will
be
used
in
the
way
that
scheduling
will
exist
it
it
should
be
a
non-issue.
The
parking
lot
should
never
be
that
full
when
they're
actually
scheduling
these
operations
and
procedures
based
on
that
I'll
reserve.
The
rest
of
my
time,
if
I
may
well
I'm
available
for
any
questions,
do
you.
E
J
E
J
File
number
rec,
22-53
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
and
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
3604
west
to
zeel
street
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
1
from
zoning
district
classification,
rs,
60,
residential
single
family
to
pd,
planned
development,
medical
office
providing
an
effective
date.
Okay,.
B
E
A
S
B
D
Thank
you,
council,
lashawn
doc,
development
coordination.
The
last
item
this
evening
is
rec
2257
for
the
property
located
at
3607,
37,
08
and
3809
north
armenia
avenue.
The
applicant
is
being
represented
by
dave
mechanic.
The
request
is
to
rezone
the
property
from
pd
and
ci
commercial
intensive
to
pd
to
allow
for
animal
shelter,
business,
professional
office,
veterinary
office
and
commercial
off
street
parking
uses
I'll
turn
it
over
to
the
planning
commission
and
then
I'll
come
back
and
get
my
report.
Thank
you.
T
Danny
collins,
again
with
your
planning
commission
staff,
our
last
case
is
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
it's
on
the
eastern
edge
of
the
mcfarland
park.
Neighborhood
capez
park
is
the
closest
public
recreation
facility
located
approximately
a
half
mile
southwest
of
the
subject
site.
North
armania
avenue
is
a
transit
emphasis,
corridor
transit
services
right
along
this
portion
of
armenia
avenue
by
heart
route.
7
connecting
the
subjects
like
west
tampa
transfer
transport
center
in
downtown
tampa
subject:
site
is
not
located
within
an
evacuation
zone.
T
T
T
Here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
A
majority
of
the
pd
is
within
the
cc35
designation,
and
then
this
western
folio
is
within
the
r10
designation.
The
r10
is
being
utilized
and
was
approved
through
a
previous
pd
for
parking.
The
remainder
is
utilized,
but
is
going
to
be
used
by
the
humane
society.
T
The
planet,
commission
staff
has
reviewed
the
application,
found
no
adverse
and
found
the
request
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
surrounding
area.
Majority
of
the
parcels
along
this
segment
of
north
armenia
avenue
are
being
utilized
for
light
commercial
and
industrial
uses
with
some
multi-family
252
family
residential
uses.
T
Since
the
subject
site
is
not
adjacent
to
any
residentially
zoned
parcels,
the
request
will
not
adversely
impact
the
surrounding
residential
uses.
The
portions
of
the
site
that
are
within
the
cc35
designation
are
within
a
mixed-use
corridor.
Typically
within
mixed-use
districts,
main
entrances
to
offices
are
to
be
oriented
toward
the
adjacent
public
right-of-way
to
address
the
mixed-use
corridor
policies,
the
apple
has
provided
a
pedestrian
connection
which
connects
the
building
entrance
to
the
sidewalk
along
north
armania
avenue
and
north
cimino
avenue.
T
Additionally,
sidewalks
are
provided
along
all
adjacent
public
rights
away.
These
sidewalks
and
pedestrian
connections
will
help
support
the
use
of
transit
along
north
armania
avenue,
which
is
a
trans
ephesus
corridor
and
will
also
ensure
sidewalks
interconnect
to
adjacent
parcels.
Planet.
Commission
staff
has
determined
that
the
applicants
address
the
mixed-use
corridor
policies
to
the
best
of
their
ability.
T
D
Thank
you,
counselor
sean
dock
development,
coordination
and
council.
This
item
contains
the
project
within
this
rezoning
request
contains
3.96
acres.
There
are
three
parcels
identified
on
the
site
plan
parcels.
One
and
3
have
current
pd
approval
and
they
are
for
the
use
of
an
animal
shelter
and
commercial
off-street
parking.
D
This
application
seeks
to
add
parcel
2,
which
is
identified
on
the
site
plan.
Parcel
3
is
located
on
the
west
side
of
armenia,
which
I'll
show
you
momentarily.
That
site
is
located
within
the
west.
Tampa
overlay.
The
remainder
of
the
site
is
not
located
within
an
overlay.
On
page
two
of
the
staff
report,
I
provided
the
parcel
numbers
and
the
existing
versus
the
proposed
square
footage.
D
It
shows
the
additions
you'll
see,
there's
no
change
proposed
on
parcel
one
with
a
change
on
parcel
two
with
12
636
square
feet
of
veterinary
office
and
then
the
commercial
parking
which
is
on
parcel
3
will
remain
the
same.
D
D
This
is
the
second
parcel,
so
this
is
located
north
of
that
existing
parcel,
and
this
would
have
the
the
increased
square
footage
on
that
parcel.
This
is
parcel
three.
This
is
the
lot
which
is
located
on
the
west
side
of
armenia.
This
is
armenia
avenue
and
it
is
used
for
surface
parking
for
that
use.
D
This
is
an
aerial
of
the
site,
so
this
is
armenia
avenue.
This
is
tampa
bay
to
orient
you
on
the
map.
This
is
the
site.
That's
located
in
the
red
outline
the
dotted
outline.
So
this
is
parcel
one.
This
is
parcel
two,
that's
located
here,
the
new
parcel,
and
then
this
is
the
parking
that's
located
there
in
the
pd,
and
you
can
see
that
this
site
is
surrounded
with
rs
50
zoning,
predominantly
in
the
area,
with
the
exception
of
armenia
avenue,
which
contains
more
of
your
commercial
zone
uses.
D
D
D
D
And
it's
another
view
and
then
this
is
west
of
site,
so
the
drc
staff
has
reviewed
the
request
and
we
find
the
request
consistent.
There
are
site
plan
modifications
required
between
first
and
second
reading
if
council
chooses
to
include
the
application.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
I'm
available.
If
you
have
any
questions,
any
questions.
D
K
Were
you
sworn.
B
Like
to
be
supported,
okay,
do
you
swear
from
you
would
tell
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth.
I
do
thank
you,
mr
chairman
council
members,
due
delayed
power.
I
will
be
as
brief.
K
As
I
can,
I
represent
the
humane
society
of
tampa
bay
and
we
are
here
asking
for
some
pretty.
E
K
K
The
cycling
at
this
point,
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
just
ask
randy
cohen,
to
give
you
an
overview
of
the
of
the
changes.
R
Good
evening
randy
cohen,
4121,
west
cypress
street,
I
have.
S
S
B
B
A
part
of
that
zoning
also
included
this
parking
lot
that
had
a
number
of
waivers.
It
was
built
consistent
with
the
zoning
and
the
waivers
this
particular
parcel
here,
which
is
the
animal
health
care
center,
was
built
under
its
existing
zoning.
However,
the
proposal
here
is
to
modify
this
building,
which
this
is
how
it
looks
today,
and
the
change
is
to
bring
it
into
the
pd
and
to.
B
E
E
T
I
like
to
thank
sir
I'd
like
to
move
file
number
rec,
2257
ordnance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
ordinance,
rezoning
property
in
the
general
we're
sending
you
3607,
3708
and
3809
north
armenia
avenue
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida,
more
particularly
describing
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification
plan
development
at
ci,
commercial,
intensive
plan,
development,
animal
shelter,
veterinary
office
business,
professional
office,
commercial
off
street
parking,
providing
effective
date.
E
A
E
G
G
Sir,
mr
chairman,
if
you
recall
sometime
last
year,
you
remember,
on
40th,
in
between
42nd
and
4th,
through
hillsboro,
before
euro
was
killed
in
a
car
by.
G
G
So
I'd
like
to
see
if
the
administration
requested
to
investigate
installing
a
memorial
market
williams
park
and
judge
with
the
kaboom
project
in
on
a
sunny
bear
who
lost
her
life
at
the
very
young
age
of
four
years
old
due
to
senseless
gun,
violence,
and
it
same
report
be
brought
back
on
august
25th
on
the
state
reports.
G
Last
one
here
I
have
mr
chairman
is
received
a
a
letter
from
a
miss
isabella
tassie
in
reference
to
the
city
of
temple
parks
park
at
the
university
of
tampa.
Apparently
there's
some
kind
of
confusion
with
the
utilization
of
the
park
on
ut's
property.
G
So
I'd
like
to
enter
her
letter
into
the
record
and
have
the
recreation
department
come
back
and
give
us
an
update
of
what
what's
indicated
in
the
letter
of
the
contractual
agreement
that
we
have
with
ut
and
the
park,
because
you're
saying
that
the
others
cannot
utilize
the
park.
G
E
J
Okay
in
2020
state
attorney
andrew
warren
won
re-election
in
hillsborough
county
with
369
1229
votes.
That's
134,
294
more
votes
than
governor
desantis
received
in
this
county
during
the
gubernatorial
election.
The
safety
of
our
community
depends
on
our
elected
prosecutor
being
able
to
conduct
the
public's
work
without
disruption
or
interference
that
elected
officials
represent.
J
The
will
of
those
who
elected
them
is
the
bedrock
of
our
community
state
attorney
warren
and
I
were
high
school
classmates
and
even
at
a
young
age,
I
realized
his
integrity
and
potential
to
use
his
talents
to
make
our
community
better.
I
urge
the
governor
to
immediately
reverse
this
decision
and
allow
our
county
to
get
back
to
business.
J
E
B
B
I've
known
mr
warren,
since
he
I
I
didn't-
go
to
high
school
with
him,
but
I've
known
him
since
he
ran
in
16,
and
I
find
him
to
be
a
very
honorable
gentleman,
a
fine
prosecutor,
a
a
good
family
man
and
just
a
good
community
servant,
and
this
is
a
real
act
against
hillsborough
county
in
tampa,
and
I
I
I
think
that
people
should
be
outraged
on
many
many
different
levels,
but
I
I've
seen
him
at
work
in
so
many
different
levels,
and
I
just
find
him
to
be
a
good
gentleman
and
a
fine,
individual
and.
B
That's
not
the
way
that
that
we
should
govern
here
in
florida
and
yeah.
So
just
my
sentiments.
Thank
you.
T
Yeah,
just
to
that
point,
and
without
naming
names
or
getting
too
deep
into
it.
When
you
watch
the
press
conference
it,
it
appears
that
tampa's
crime
rate
is
going
to
be
politicized
over
the
next
few
months
and
there
are
alternative
narratives.
T
T
There
are
other
people
that
they
blame
for
it,
but
our
tampa's,
violent
crime
rate
has
gone
up
every
year
for
the
last
three
years
as
presented
by
our
new
police
chief,
and
this
council
has
approved
every
funding
increasing,
including
the
last
pay
increase
and,
and
we've
been
criticized
by
that
for
with
a
lot
of
folks
in
the
community.
But
there
are
a
lot
of
reasons
to
the
crime
rate
has
gone
up
and
I'm
not
to
make
a
motion
now.
T
But
I
think
if
we
we
may
at
some
point,
want
to
use
our
investigative
powers
to
do
an
objective.
Third,
get
an
objective
third-party
organization
to
look
at
tampa's
crime
rate,
not
that
we
wouldn't
trust
the
views
of
anybody
else,
but
it
we
would
need
to
have
somebody
who
is
outside
the
market
who
is
respected.
T
E
Thank
you
very
much
anything
else,
sir
councilman
goose.
I
have
to
hand.
C
G
Mr
maniscalco
has
made
a
motion,
mr
ran
that,
second,
all
in
favor
all
right.
Any
polls
how's
that.