►
From YouTube: TCC PM 4/14/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
C
Good
afternoon,
I'd
like
to
call
this
tampa
city
council
meeting
to
order.
Mr
shelby,
do
you
have
anything
to
read
sir?
Yes,.
C
Wait
wait
sir
roll
call
from
call
sorry,
yes,
ma'am.
D
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
chairman
martin
shelby
city
council
attorney
tonight's
meeting
april.
14Th
is
here
with
an
in-person
quorum
and
members
of
the
public
may
participate
here
in
city
council,
either
by
attending
in
person
in
city,
council
chambers,
at
315,
east
kennedy,
boulevard
or
virtually
through
video
teleconferencing,
referred
to
by
florida
statute,
statutes
and
rules
as
communication
media
technology,
and
please
be
advised
that
pre-registration
is
necessary
to
participate
virtually
in
a
public
hearing
on
quasi-judicial
or
legislative
matters
and
for
more
information
about
the
ability
to
participate
in
public
hearings
via
cmt.
D
Detailed
instructions
on
how
to
participate
is
at
tampa.gov
forward.
Slash
quasi
a
reminder
that,
in
order
to
participate
via
cmt,
you
must
have
access
to
a
communications
media
device
such
as
a
tablet
or
computer
equipped
with
a
camera
or
microphone.
That
will
enable
you
to
be
seen
by
video
and
heard
by
audio
by
the
city,
council
and
all
other
participants.
D
For
these
specific
two-way
virtual
meetings.
Cell
phones
and
smartphones
are
not
compatible
as
they
will
not
allow
you
to
share
your
camera
when
connected
again.
If
you
do
need
assistance,
that
information
is
available
on
the
city
council's
webpage
and
also
in
the
agenda
of
tonight's
meeting,
also
council,
I
would
ask
that
you
not
if
you
have
any
ex
parte
communications,
that
you
do
disclose
them
and
if
you
receive
any
communications
electronically
during
the
meeting
relative
tonight's
hearing
that
you
immediately
disclose
them.
D
That
being
said,
also,
if
you
are
on
the
go
to
meeting
platform
appearing
virtually,
please
be
reminded
that
the
chat
section
is
not
to
be
communicating
with
city
council
members.
It
is
only
for
technical
difficulties
and
technical
issues.
So
with
that
all
being
said,
mr
chairman
I'd
ask
council
to
make
a
motion
to
waive
the
rules
to
allow
c
cmt
participation.
C
Consistently
with
the
councilman
good
secretary,
all
right
any
opposed.
D
And
also,
mr
chairman,
my
understanding
is
council.
Member
vieira
is
online
and
a
motion
to
allow
him
to
participate
virtually.
C
C
Motion
to
open
items,
one
through
thirteen
do
we
have
a
second
sec.
Second
from
councilmember
goods,
all
in
favor
aye,
any
opposed
all
right.
Before
we
begin.
I
know
there's
some
housekeeping
from
what
I
see
here
unless
there's
more
items
three
and
four
there's
a
request
for
continuance
to
may
12th
and
item
number.
Nine
is
an
email
to
a
withdrawal.
D
I'm
sorry,
mr
chairman,
if
you
want
to
take
those
up
first,
we
can
do
that.
I
have
a
request
after
we,
if
you
take
care
of
those.
G
Good
evening
council,
my
name
is
tyler.
Hudson
my
address
is
400
north
ashley
drive.
I
do
not
like
to
ask
for
continuances,
so
I'd
like
to
just
briefly
explain
why
we
need
one.
The
gte
credit
union,
complex
near
downtown,
adjacent
to
encore,
henderson
avenue
runs
through
that.
If
you
guys
can
see
on
the
overhead.
G
There's
an
opportunity
to
to
really
reconnect
henderson
avenue
as
part
of
the
street
grid
in
this
area
in
yellow
is
where
the
subject
site
is:
that's
actually
been
vacated.
What
the
mobility
department
of
the
city
wants
us
to
do
is
give
that
back
to
the
city
to
essentially
open
up
henderson
there,
and
that
would
leave
just
the
portion
in
blue,
which
is
the
mowbly
park
apartments.
G
As
the
last
remaining
item
that
we
need
to
get
resolved
to
reconnect
the
grid
here.
So
I
thought
30
days
would
be
enough
to
handle
the
open
issues
and
that's
my
fault.
It
wasn't,
but
I'm
very
confident
that
by
may
12th
we'll
have
everything
in
order
with
mobility
to
present
the
site
plan
that
shows
the
return
of
henderson
avenue
back
to
the
city,
so
that
eventually
can
be
reconnected,
and
I
have
to
answer
any
questions.
But
thank
you
for
your
consideration.
C
D
C
D
Have
to
do
a
roll
call,
because
mr
vieira
is
okay,
roll.
C
All
right
and
the
next
item
there's
a
requester,
withdraw.
I
believe
it's,
mr
mickelini.
Sir
item
number,
nine.
H
Good
evening,
council,
I'm
not
really
sure
how
my
name
got
on
this,
but
it's
not
my
project.
Okay,.
C
F
A
F
D
Yes,
sir,
if
you're
going
to
be
going
into
the
meeting
the
hearings
tonight,
mr
chairman,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
this
is
clear
for
the
record
that
council
received
newly
revised
revision
sheets
on
certain
hearings
tonight
and
I'd
like
to
ask
council
after
I,
rather
than
do
them
individually,
just
read
it
into
the
record
and
counsel
move
to
accept
the
substitution
for
the
revision
sheets,
the
revised
revision
sheets,
all
right
and
that
would
be
item
number
five
rez
21-46
item
number
six
rez,
21-85,
rez
21-99
is
number
seven,
then
number
11,
rez
22-19
item
12,
rec,
22-20
and
lastly,
rez
22-21
number
13,
and
these
have
been
provided
to
the
clerk
and
they
have
been
uploaded
to
sire
all
right
motion
to
substitute
the
revision.
C
E
J
Good
evening
council,
this
is
danny
collins
with
your
client
commissioned
staff.
Today
we'll
be
presenting
a
comprehensive
plan,
math
amendment,
it's
tacpa,
2114.
J
Subject:
site
is
located
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district.
It's
shown
here
on
our
locational
map.
It's
within
the
old
west,
tampa
neighborhood
and
it's
within
the
west
tampa
national
historic
district.
J
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
the
surrounding
properties
you'll
see
this
subject.
Sites
outlined
in
this
black
color.
Presently
there
is
the
pistilla
and
diaz
brothers
cigar
factory,
which
is
located
on
the
northwestern
portion
of
the
subject
site.
The
subject
site
is
generally
at
the
northwest
corner
of
north
albany
avenue
and
west
walnut
street.
J
The
surrounding
area
is
predominantly
residential
in
character.
There
are
detached
single-family
residential
uses
directly
to
the
north,
to
the
east,
south
and
west
of
the
subject
site.
As
you
move
north
along
albany
avenue,
there
is
another
cigar
factory,
just
north
of
the
subject
site
on
the
subject.
Site
is
also
one
block
east
of
north
howard
avenue.
This
segment
of
north
howard
avenue
contains
predominantly
non-residential
uses.
J
Here
is
an
image
of
the
subject
site.
This
is
the
you're
still
india's
brother's
cigar
factory,
which
is
located,
like
I
said
at
the
northwest
corner
of
the
subject
site.
This
is
an
image
I'm
just
looking
east
at
the
site
from
north
eleni
avenue.
J
J
J
J
J
Here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map
you'll
see
this
gray
at
the
northern
portion
of
the
subject.
Site
represents
the
light
industrial
designation,
which
is
approximately
a
mix
of
0.67
acres
of
the
subject
site.
The
remaining
0.66
acres
is
the
residential
35
that
is
shown
on
at
the
eastern
portion
of
the
site
and
then
at
the
southern
portion
of
the
site
at
the
intersection
of
walnut
street
and
north
albany.
The
surrounding
area
is
predominantly
residential,
35
that
are
35's
to
the
north
east,
south
and
west
of
the
subject
site.
J
As
you
move
south
along
north
albany
avenue,
there
are
parcels
recognized
under
the
residential
20
and
then
further
south
are
parcels
recognized
under
the
community
commercial
35
designation.
J
I
do
want
to
note
that
you
know
one
block
to
the
north
of
the
subject
site
shown
in
this
great
colors
parcel
recognized
under
the
light
industrial
designation.
There
are
two
block.
Approximately
two
blocks.
East
of
the
site
is
north
rome
avenue,
and
there
are
some
parcels
that
are
recognized
under
the
nmu
35
and
light
industrial
and
r35
designation.
J
J
Here's
a
slide
showing
the
potential
impacts
of
the
proposed
change.
Currently,
the
subject
site
can
be
considered
for
23
dwelling
units
or
just
over
61
000
square
feet
of
non-residential
development.
Currently
residential
uses
can
cannot
be
considered
on
the
light
and
flight
industrial
portions
of
the
site,
as
proposed
under
the
presidential
35
designation.
J
J
The
planning
commission
reviewed
the
request
and
found
it
consistent
with
several
policies.
In
the
comprehensive
plan
it
was
considered.
It
was
consistent
with
the
city,
design
and
city
planning
strategy
and
promoting
a
compact
city,
the
city
compact
residential
development.
J
J
The
request
was
found
consistent
with
the
multi-family
in
multi-family
residential
areas,
housing
sections
of
the
plan
by
promoting
housing
in
within
the
urban
villages,
and
also
it
was
consistent
with
infrastructure,
specifically
infrastructure
policy
1.1.17,
which
directs
growth
to
those
urban
villages.
J
Based
on
those
considerations,
the
planet
commission
recommends
that
the
proposed
map
amendment
be
found
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
imagine
2040
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
This
concludes
my
presentation,
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Any.
A
Frank
hall,
with
your
city
planning
staff,
as
I
placed
on
your
in
front
of
you,
some
updates
to
our
original
comments,
we're
still
we're
we're.
We
have
no
objections
to
the
request.
I
just
wanted
to
add
some
additional
meat
to
our
to
our
initial
comments.
If
you
take
a.
A
In
the
second
page,
you'll
note
that
we
added
under
section
a
that
portions
of
the
subject
site,
including
the
properties
north,
south,
east
and
west,
are
designated
our
residential
35.
So
that
is
again
supporting
this.
This
request
down
to
the.
A
Transit,
stop
is
located
one
block
to
the
west
of
the
subject
site
on
north
howard.
I
believe
that's
route
14
and
then
we
go
all
the
way
down
to
the
towards
the
bottom.
On
item
number.
G
Two
rather
you'll
see
that,
based
on
historical.
K
K
It
is
a
place
where
you
want
to
encourage
urban
infill
development,
and
you
will
shortly
see
a
rezoning
application
where
we
are
proposing
on
this
property
of
an
appropriate
urban
infill
development.
I
would
just
like
to
point
out
that
we're
asking
for
residential
35,
the
properties
on
all
sides
of
this
property
are
designated
residential
35,
so
it
is
entirely
compatible
with
the
area,
and
with
that
I
will
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank
you.
C
Any
questions
for
the
gentleman
remember:
there's
a
traveling
rezoning
with
us,
so
any
questions
nope.
Do
we
have
anybody
in
the
public
that
wishes
to
speak
on
this
item?
This
is
item
number
one
close.
We
have
a
motion
close
from
council
member
good
secretary
councilmember
miranda,
all
in
favor,
aye,
aye,
all
right,
council
member
miranda.
Would
you
mind
reading.
F
Our
interview,
thank
you,
mr
chairman
found
number
th
cpa
2114
orders
being
presented
for
first
reading,
an
ordinance
amending
the
image,
2040
temp,
a
comprehensive
plan.
Future
lend
use
element,
future
land
use
map
for
the
property
located
at
2111,
north
albany
avenue,
from
light
industrial
li
and
residential
35
r-35
parentheses
to
residential
dash
35,
r-35
parentheses,
providing
for
repeal
of
all
orders
and
conflict
providing
for
severability
providing
an
effective
date.
C
E
E
L
C
D
C
Before
we
do,
if
you're
going
to
speak
on
anything
else
on
the
agenda,
we
are
now
in
our
quasi-judicial
hearings.
Please
stand
and
raise
your
right
hand.
So
we'll
swear
everybody
in
at
once.
C
All
right,
well
good
item
number
six,
mr
mechanic,
we'll
begin
with:
okay.
C
B
C
B
This
is
for
the
proposed
rezoning
at
the
location,
two
one
one:
one:
north
albany
avenue
proposal,
zoning
from
ci
commercial,
intensive,
rm16,
residential
multi-family
and
rs
50
residential
single-family
2pd
plan
development,
residential
single-family
attached
and
residential
multi-family.
I'll
now
pass
along
to
the
planning
commission,
mr
collins,.
C
J
All
right
so
danny
collins
again
with
your
planning,
commission
staff,
I've
been
sworn
in.
Our
next
case
is
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically
in
the
west,
tampa
urban
village.
The
subjects
or
ray
park
is
the
closest
closest
recreation
facility
being
located
within
a
quarter
mile
to
the
northwest
of
the
subject.
Site
transit
is
located
to
the
north
along
north
howard
avenue
on
this
route.
It
provides
connections,
west
downtown,
tampa
this
amendment
or
I'm
sorry.
This
rezoning
is
a
companion
amendment.
J
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
the
surrounding
properties
again
subject:
sites
located
at
the
north
east
corner
of
walnut
street
north
albany
avenue,
subject
shown
in
areas
predominantly
residential
and
character
and
again
there's
a
starbuck
that
presently
occupies
the
subjects.
J
J
Planning
commission
staff
reviewed
the
request
and
found
it
consistent
with
a
number
of
policies.
In
the
comprehensive
plan
the
applicant
is
redeveloping
a
cigar
factory,
which
is
eligible
for
a
historic
designation
for
multi-family
uses.
The
comprehensive
plan
encourages
sustainable
development
preservation
of
historic
structures
through
adaptive,
reuse.
The
apple
clean
is
utilizing
land
use
policy
5.1.7
to
propose
21
multi-family
residential
units
within
the
cigar
factory.
J
The
planning
commission
staff
requested
that
the
application
provide
a
no
referencing
land
use
policy
5.1.7
on
the
on
the
site
plan
between
first
and
second
reading.
City's
comprehensive
plan
encourages
the
design
and
development
of
single-family
attached
and
multi-family
projects,
including
orientation
on
the
front
doors,
sidewalk
and
street.
The
orientation
of
the
front
doors
to
all
attached
single
family
units
are
oriented
toward
a
sidewalk
and
street.
Additionally,
the
entrance
to
the
existing
cigar
factory
is
oriented
and
connects
to
the
sidewalk
of
north
albany
avenue.
J
Therefore,
planning
commission
staff
lines
the
request
consistent
with
this
policy
direction.
Additionally,
the
pd
provides
internal
pedestrian
connections,
so
pedestrians
can
safely
access
the
amenities
provided
within
the
site,
but
also
can
access,
transit
and
commercial
services
provided
along
north
howard
avenue,
which
is
the
transit
emphasis
corridor,
the
comprehensive
plan
or
I'm
sorry.
The
request
will
promote
a
residential
development
pattern,
consistent
with
the
compact
city
forum
strategy,
with
increased
available
valuability
of
housing
at
densities
that
promote
walking
and
transit
year,
near
employment
concentrations,
residential
services
and
amenities.
J
Furthermore,
the
request
will
add
additional
housing
choices
within
the
old
west
tampa
neighborhood,
while
protecting
the
character
of
the
west
tampa
historic
district.
Based
on
these
considerations,
the
planet,
commission
staff
finds
the
request
consistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
That
concludes
my
presentation
available
for
any
questions.
Any.
B
C
Activate
the
there,
it
is
wonderful.
B
B
the
whole
entire
subject:
parcel
is
61
162
square
feet
or
1.4
acres.
Part
of
the
lot
here
is
vacant,
as
I'll
show
you
on
the
side
plan.
Part
of
the
wall
is
vacant
and
part
is
a
cigar
factory.
At
this
current
time.
It's
located
at
the
intersection
of
north
albany
avenue,
west
pine
street
and
west
walnut
street.
B
B
B
B
Development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
inconsistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
land
development
code.
Modifications
to
the
site
plan
must
be
completed
by
the
applicant
between
first
and
second
reading
and
also
for
all
revisions
on
the
revision
sheet,
if
approved
by
council.
Thank
you
I'm
here
for
any
questions.
Any
questions.
C
Did
you
find
an
inconsistent
because
of
the
the
parking.
B
K
K
I
would
just
like
to
say
for
the
record
that
we
do
agree
with
the
recommended
revisions,
and
I
would
point
out
that
most
of
the
revisions,
if
which
we
intend
to
make
resolve
the
majority
of
the
inconsistencies
regarding
the
application
at
this
time.
I
would
like
to
ask
mr
garcia
to
give
you
an
overview
of
the
project
and
to
address
our
parking
waiver,
which
I
would
just
like
to
emphasize
to
council,
is
a
minor
request,
a
five
percent
reduction
in
the
parking.
Thank.
M
Good
evening
city,
council,
members,
sorry
for
my
attire
I
have
a
sick,
wife
and
daughter
at
home.
M
Omar
garcia,
yes,
sir
just
wanted
to
say
my
name
is
emma
garcia.
I'm
one
of
the
managing
members
of
west
hampton
development
group
we're
essentially
the
same
group
of
investors
that
were
involved
in
the
west
river
flats
development
and
also
220
madison
in
downtown
tampa.
I
want
to
give
you
some
background
on
our
track
record
and
insight
as
to
what
we
have
in
terms
of
parking
with
actual
parking
requirements
in
the
area
and
and
also
our
background
in
historical
preservation.
M
West
river
flats
was
135
unit
apartment
community
located
just
a
couple
blocks
away
from
the
proposed
site
when
we
originally
purchased
west
river
flats
in
in
2014,
there
was
over
40
vacant
units.
Basically
uninhabitable,
roofs
were
leaking.
Air
conditioners
were
about
30
years
old.
We
did
a
lot
of
repairs
to
it
during
that
time.
M
We
also
worked
with
tampa
housing's
north
boulevard
homes,
group
and
presbyterian
village
to
relocate
some
of
their
folks
that
needed
to
stay
in
the
area,
so
we
worked
with
them
on
that
that
needed
to
stay
in
the
west
river
area.
M
We
also
worked
hand-in-hand
with
the
city
of
tampa
police
department
to
make
improvements
to
the
property
and
basically
eliminated
criminal
activity
in
the
community
and
improve
the
overall
neighborhood.
In
fact,
our
camera
systems
that
we
installed
assisted,
tampa
police
department
in
solving
a
double
homicide.
Just
down
the
street
on
walnut
fast
forward
to
2020
and
west
river
flats
was
100
occupied.
We
had
put
those
40
uninhabitable
units
back
into
service
with
modern
upgrades
we
constructed
a
community
pool
built
a
dog
park,
replaced
all
the
roofs
upgraded
parking
and
installed
led
lighting
throughout
the
property.
M
Based
on
our
experience
at
west
river
flats,
which
is
located
only
a
few
blocks
away
from
the
bastille
brothers
and
diaz
cigar
factory,
our
parking
ratio
was
one
parking
spot
per
apartment,
which
turned
out
to
be
more
than
sufficient
for
our
needs.
Our
220
madison
property
is
located
across
the
street
from
the
tampa
police
department
headquarters.
M
M
Today,
220
has
been
brought
back
to
life
and
we're
on
our
third
year
of
100
occupancy
in
a
136
bed
student
housing
community
that
we
had
over
150
people
on
our
waiting
list,
that's
after
being
fully
released
up
for
fall
of
2021
and
we're
already
fully
leased
up
for
fall.
2022
since
january
shows
you
the
demand.
M
In
2020,
we
were
awarded
the
hillsborough
county
planning,
commission
jan
able
award
for
historical
preservation.
220
madison
is
now
locally
and
nationally
designated
historical
landmark
and
in
addition,
at
220
madison
with
over
136
residents,
we
have
zero
parking.
Our
residents
walk,
uber,
skateboard
or
ride
a
bike.
M
Today
we
are
requesting
your
approval
for
rezoning
from
industrial
to
a
plant
development
which
will
restore
the
former
bastille
brothers,
india's
cigar
factory,
as
well
as
convert
vacant
unused
land
into
more
housing.
We
believe
the
past
industrial
zone
did
not
fit
well
in
what
is
essentially
an
industrial
in
a
residential
neighborhood.
The
bastille
brothers
and
diaz
cigar
factory
is
in
a
state
of
significant
disrepair.
M
Our
plan
is
to
preserve
it
by
replacing
all
the
windows
roof
repointing
the
brick
and
like
our
220
madison
property,
we
will
be
working
with
the
city
of
tampa's
historical
preservation
office
to
also
designate
the
bastille
brothers,
india's
cigar
factory
into
a
locally
and
nationally
designated
historical
landmark,
in
fact
we're
working
with
jvv
architects.
The
architecture
firm
located
in
the
west
tampa
community
to
assist
us
with
the
design.
M
As
you
know,
we're
in
a
housing
crisis
in
tampa,
the
development
will
help
bring
more
housing
options
closer
to
the
urban
core,
while
removing
removing
the
industrial
use
from
the
residential
property.
We're
requesting
a
very
modest
parking
variance
that
we
believe
is
supported
by
our
prior
projects
like
our
220
madison
community.
We
hope
our
cigar
loft
community
will
again
be
another
award-winning
project.
We
respectfully
request
your
approval
on
the
on
the
parking
variants
and
other
variances.
Thank
you
very
much.
M
So
I
believe,
if
you
look
back,
there
was
a
church
there
and-
and
I'm
I'm
dennis
fernandez-
probably
gotta
go
to
this,
but
I
think
it
was
saint
joseph
church
at
one
time.
If
you
go
down
the
street
just
a
couple
blocks,
it
was
academy
of
holy
names.
School
was
the
was
the
original
location.
I
believe
there
was
a
church
there.
I
don't
know
if
there
was
any
any
homes
there
at
any.
C
F
I'm
seeing
two
different
site
plans,
one
that
has
the
parking
which
is
diagonal
parking
and
one
that
has
a
perpendicular
lined
up
in
a
row
which,
which
site
plant
are
you
submitting?
It's.
M
The
one
that's
perpendicular,
the
original
angular
one
was
based
on
the
vacating
of
the
alley
which
the
transportation
objected
to.
We
then
left
the
alley
and
provided
an
easement
going
north
and
and
that
allowed
for
the
change
or
or
granted
the
change
for
the
the
reconfigured
parking
arrangement
and.
F
I'm
sorry,
I
cannot
remember
what
mr
mechanic
said:
what's
the
percentage
of
parking
spaces
that
you're
asking
for
in
the
waiver,
I
believe
it's
five
percent,
five
percent.
Yes,
sir,
what
are
you
doing?
I
I
see
a
number
of
compact
car
spaces
and
I
saw
there
was
motorcycle
spaces,
but
what
else
are
you
doing
to
offset
that
five
percent?
Obviously.
M
A
M
It's
it's
a
housing
for
anyone,
but
I
can
tell
you
right
now
that
in
that
area,
there's
a
lot
of
ut.
Students
are
already
taking
up
housing
in
that
area.
So
that's
that's
going
to
be
obviously
a
potential
for
some
students
to
move
to
the
property.
Yesterday,
the.
A
Reason,
that's
because
that's
an
older
community
where
that
cigar
factory
is
yes,
sir,
if
you
I'm
sorry,
sir.
Well,
I'm
just
saying
that's
the
older
community.
I
knew
some
of
the
residents
already
complaining
about
the
students
already
in
those
communities.
That's
why
I
wanna
know
what
kind
of
housing
was
going
there
when
you
kept
talking
about
a
lot
of
bicycles
and
things
like
that.
That
means
to
me
that
means
ut
students
in
inside
of
communities.
So
I
just
wanna
see
what
kind
of
housing
that
was
gonna,
be
there.
M
Well,
it
is,
anyone
is
encouraged
to
to
live
there.
Obviously,
fair
housing
does
not
allow
us
to
select
based
on
any
kind
of,
but
but
clearly
there's
a
demand
for
housing
in
the
area,
both
from
universities
to
students
and
local
residents.
It's
putting
huge
pressure
in
the
area,
and
I
think
we
with
our
west
river
property,
we
were
able
to
bring
a
lot
of
unused
units
back
to
life.
We
hope
to
do
the
same
thing
with
something
that's
been
basically
sitting
there
vacant
unused
with
no
housing.
C
M
I
will
leave
those
discussions
to
our
architect.
They
can
probably
answer
them
in
greater
detail.
K
Okay,
next
up
is
the
architect
ralph,
schuler
and
he'll
show
you
some
renderings
okay
and
address
the
other
wafers.
Thank
you.
N
Evening,
ralph
schuler
2401,
north
howard
avenue.
I
have
been
sworn
so
it's
been
a
lot
of
back
and
forth
in
refining
these
plans,
but
I'll
address
mainly
the
waivers
of
course.
The
parking
which
was
already
discussed
is
really
only
three
spaces
and
then
there's
a
a
waiver
for
block
averaging
block
averaging
because
we
are
in
the
west
amp
overlay
district
reduce
so
block
averaging
is
a
standard
request
through
that
on
walnut
we're
we're
going
from
a
block
average
of
15.5
and
we're
actually
going
to
18.
N
So
we
have
a
little
bit
deeper
there,
mainly
because
we
have
some
some.
We
have
no
alley
alley
there.
So
we're
parking
some
parking
to
the
front
on
on
west
albany
I'll
show
you
that
real
quick
yeah,
so
that
was
this
block
average,
this
block
average.
There
is
no
block
average,
because
there
is
nothing
here
except
for
the
cigar
factory
itself.
So
that's
why
it
seems
like
a
funny
number.
N
N
This
this
buffer,
so
we
are
going
to
have
a
an
open
alley
so
that
buffer
in
can't
can't
be
granted
for
five
feet
because
we're
going
to
be
using
it
to
for
vehicular
use,
so
that
waivers
goes
from
five
to
zero
and
then
also
the
required
50
retention
on
non-wooded
sites
greater
than
one
acre.
We
technically
aren't
greater
than
one
acre,
but
we
only
have
about
four
four
trees.
Our
arborist
can
speak
more
in
detail
to
that,
so
we
are
removing
more
than
fifty
percent
of
the
trees.
N
Obviously,
when
you
only
have
four
trees,
it's
tough
to
meet
that
requirement
and
then
also
I'd
like
to
quickly
review
our
design
proposal
for
the
elevations.
So
this
is,
of
course,
the
the
existing
cigar
factory.
We
will
need
to
make
it
meet
code
today,
of
course,
with
with
fire
stairs
elevators
and
all
the
things
are
required
for
for
a
modern
building.
N
N
This
is
going
to
be
the
main
egress
and
ingress
of
of
the
project,
with
a
stair
and
elevator,
and
I'm
kind
of
a
versus
still
bringing
refined,
but
some
sort
of
a
glass
enclosure
that
that
doesn't
try
and
mimic
the
existing
cigar
factory,
but
provides
again
some
some
similar
detailing
to
what
our
our
exterior
fire
stair
would
be.
So
the
south
elevation
which
would
be
facing
internal
and
the
north
elevation,
which
is
faces
west
pine
street,.
N
This
is
the
six
on
walnut
that
are
facing
south
they're,
a
three-story
product
with
with
a
main
entrance
facing
the
street.
We
do
have
a
single
one-car
garage
and
that's
mainly
again,
because
we
have
no
no
access
to
vehicular
access
anywhere
else
on
the
site,
and
then
we
have
some
balconies
on
the
second
floor
and
it
would
be
a
three
bedroom
three
and
a
half
bath
product
similar
here
on
the
albany
avenue.
We
have
a
slightly
different,
looking
townhouse
that
faces
again
west
on
albany.
N
These
would
we'd
all
have
front
doors
in
in
in
small
stoops
entrance
they're
a
two-story
looking
product
and
with
a
third
story
on
the
back
half
with
a
rooftop
deck
and
and
those
again
have
other
elevations.
But
we
happy
to
address
any
questions
and
about
the
overall
architectural
design
is.
C
It
gonna
be
just
yes.
L
Yes,
I
was,
I
think,
we're
probably
gonna,
ask
the
same
question.
What
kind
of
materials
are
you
gonna
be
using.
N
C
N
K
No
sir,
we
are
concluding
our
presentation
behind.
C
O
My
name
is
nathan
hagan
good
evening,
it's
nice
to
be
in
this
room.
Finally,
I
just
want
to
say
if,
if
you've
spoken
to
me
before,
you
know,
I
ride
my
bike
for
probably
like
90
of
the
trips
that
I
take
and
I'm
not
a
student.
So
I
just
want
to
highlight
that
there
are
people
like
me
who
are
looking
for
housing
that
we're
not
paying
for
parking.
O
I'm.
You
know
pretty
much
the
demographic
for
this,
but
to
that
end
I
want
to
talk
about
parking
a
little
bit
more.
A
third
of
this
project
is
parking
and
I
live
in
west
tampa
and
again
I
ride
my
bike.
Nine
percent
of
the
time
I'm
saying
I'm
not
saying
that's
for
everybody,
but
there's
market
people
who
are
like
me
who
want
to
live
that
way,
and
this
neighborhood
does
not
need
housing
for
cars.
It
needs
housing
for
people.
O
So
I'm
I'm
a
little
bit
disappointed
to
see
that
we're
requiring
a
third
of
the
lot
usage
to
be
surface
lot.
So
those
are
my
main
comments
for
this.
C
C
Thank
you
all
right.
Well
before
we
close,
I
think
it's
an
awesome
project.
Anybody
that
goes
to
restore
a
cigar
factory.
Compliments
to
you,
because
they're
very,
very
expensive
cigar
factories,
in
my
opinion,
are
are
west,
tampa's
castles,
because
they're
very
unique
to
our
area.
Being
that
we
were
the
cigar
capital
of
the
world,
and
you
know
a
compliment
for
undertaking
this
big
project.
C
You
know
you're,
restoring
and
preserving
our
history,
which
is
important
and
at
the
same
time
providing
housing
which,
of
course,
we're
in
great
need
for
so
anybody
else.
If
not
motion
to
close.
O
P
F
Thank
you
very
much
call
number
rec,
21-85
and
norman
sv.
Excuse
me
an
ordinance
presenting
property
in
general
facility
of
2111
north
albany
avenue
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida,
more
particularly
described
in
section
1
zoning
district
classification,
ci,
commercial,
intensive
to
rm16
residential
multi-family
to
rs,
50,
residential
multi-family
to
pd
plan
development,
residential
single
family
attached
and
residential
multi-family,
providing
an
effective
date
that
the
petitioner
has
met
the
burden
of
proof
and
his
compliance
with
applicable
goals,
subjects
and
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
I.e
consistent
with
land
use,
objective,
9.2.
F
C
A
C
Yes,
wait:
councilwoman.
L
I
wanted
to
say
that
I
I
too
love
this
project,
but
I
would,
I
would
personally
have
been
willing
to
go
further
with
parking
waivers
for
that
very
reason
that
was
spoken
to
earlier
about
people
in
this
particular
area.
Really
wanting
alternate
uses
and
better
use
of
land.
C
E
F
C
C
C
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
B
J
The
coastal
public
recreation
facility
skyview
park,
which
is
located
approximately
a
thousand
feet
to
the
southeast
of
the
site.
The
closest
transit
station,
is
located
approximately
one
mile
to
the
west
at
the
intersection
inner
bay
boulevard
and
south
south
del
mar
highway.
The
site
is
within
a
level
a
evacuation
zone
and
the
coastal
high
hazard
area.
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject's
site
and
surrounding
properties.
J
Subject:
sites
outlined
in
this
purple
color,
it's
generally
south
of
west
bay,
avenue
and
east
south
mcgill
avenue
you'll
see
the
surrounding
development
patterns
predominantly
residential
and
character.
There
are
some
single-family
attached
uses
within
the
surrounding
area,
as
well
as
a
single-family
detached
uses
just
to
the
east
of
the
subject.
Site
here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
J
Subject,
sites
currently
recognized
either
under
the
residential
10th
feature
land
use
designation,
which
typically
allows
for
development
up
to
10
million
per
acre
just
to
the
that
residential
tent
is
to
the
north
east
and
south
of
the
site
and
then
directly
to
the
west
of
the
site
along
mcdill
is
our
parcel
is
recognized
under
the
residential
20
future
land
use
designation.
J
Approximately
one
block
north
the
site
on
south
mcdell
avenue
are
partials
recognized
under
the
community.
Mixed
use,
35
future
language,
designation,
planning,
commission
staff
reviewed
the
request,
finds
the
request
consists
or
finds
a
request
will
not
cause
any
adverse
impact
surrounding
area
south
fourth
street
between
west
bay
avenue
and
west
vinicker
avenue.
It's
planned
for
development
up
to
10
million
per
acre.
The
average
density
of
the
street
is
currently
developed
at
a
half
of
its
anticipated
density.
J
The
request
is
consistent
with
the
plan's
housing
policies.
The
proposed
rs-50
zoning
district
will
create
additional
housing
opportunities,
approximated
trans
and
employment
opportunities
located
along
south
mcdell
avenue
subject
site
is
within
the
coastal
hazard
area.
Applicants
should
ensure
that
there
will
be
no
negative
impacts
on
hurricane
evacuation
times
routes,
shelter
demands
for
the
residents
of
the
proposed
development
and
mitigate
any
negative
impacts
that
may
affect
residents
in
the
future.
Overall,
this
rezoning
will
provide
compatible
development
and
contribute
to
the
economic
health
of
the
city.
J
Furthermore,
the
request
is
consistent
with
the
development
pattern
dissipated
under
the
residential
tin
by
future
land
use
designation.
Based
on
these
considerations,
planning,
commission
staff
finds
the
request
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
imagine
2040
type
of
conference
plan.
This
concludes
my
presentation
available
for
any
questions.
B
All
right,
if
you
look
at
the
plat
here,
you'll
see
the
three
lots:
12
13
and
14.
now
in
the
rs
50
district.
This
allows
for
a
maximum
density
of
one
dwelling
unit
per
5
000
square
feet
with
a
minimum
lot
of
50
feet:
1
2
3..
So
therefore
a
maximum
of
three
dwelling
units
would
be
allowed
on
the
subject
parcel
if
all
other
land
development
regulations
are
met.
B
B
B
Staff
has
analyzed
the
conforming
map
staff
has
identified
that
57
of
the
lots
in
the
studied
area.
50
percent
of
the
loss
in
the
subject-
block
50
of
the
block
of
4th
street
and
75
percent
of
the
block
face
are
lot
widths
of
59.99
feet
or
less
staff
finds
a
proposed
request
for
rezoning
to
be
consistent
with
the
existing
development
pattern
of
the
overall
study
area
and
block
face.
B
B
H
Good
evening,
council,
steve
michelini,
representing
jason
starling
as
the
petitioner
for
this
project,
I'd
like
to
to
point
out
first
that
we
have
a
consistent
finding
from
both
the
planning,
commission
and
the
city
staff
and
that
any
subsequent
waivers
would
have
to
follow
additional
processes.
So
in
the
rezoning
process,
we're
not
asking
for
waivers
and
none
can
be
granted.
So
we
have
to
meet
the
rs
50
guidelines
regarding
setbacks,
which
are
seven
and
seven
on
each
side
and
20
and
20
feet
in
the
front
and
the
rear.
H
The
red
dot
represents
the
existing
site
and,
as
you
can
see
in
the
the
northwest
corner
is
a
large
church
and
a
parking
lot.
And
then
you
also
see
multi-family
here,
and
I
have
some
some
photographs
of
those
as
well.
But
this
is
the
the
existing
property
and
they
were
requesting
to
restore
the
original
three
platted
lots
that
were
established
in
1922.
H
We're
in
a
residential
10
land
use
classification
which
allows
for
the
residential
for
the
rs50
to
be
considered
and
as
staff
has
pointed
out,
57
percent
of
the
area
homes
have
been
found
to
be
less
than
60
feet
in
width
and
75
percent
of
those
on
the
immediate
block
face
are
less
than
60
feet
in
width
we
have
a
mix
of
townhouses,
multi-family
and
commercial
in
the
immediate
vicinity,
and
this
is
tucked
into
a
corner
in
the
rear.
As
I
showed
you
on
the
aerial
photograph.
H
We
meet
all
of
the
criteria
regarding
the
development
of
this
project
for
consideration
to
council
and
where
rick
has
been
recommended.
Favorably
to
you,
the
the
comprehensive
plan
allows
for
this
consideration
and
I'm
going
to
go
through
the
the
various
comp
plan
provisions
that
are
contained
within
the
report.
H
Land
use,
objective,
8.14,
8.141
and
overall
residential
development
and
redevelopment
criteria,
objectives,
9.2,
9.2.1,
9.3,
9.3.8,
single
family
area
objectives,
9.5,
9.151,
9.53,
and
adequate
sites
for
accommodating
housing,
1.3,
1.34,
neighborhood,
community
plans
and
objectives,
1.3
land
use
policy,
1.3,
10,
hurricane
evacuation
plan
and
shelters.
This
typically
would
allow
for
the
infill
of
these
three
units.
H
The
density
would
be
below
the
residential
10
density,
that's
allowed
for
consideration
and
overall
the
size,
height
width
and
the
the
scale
would
be
the
same.
With
a
limit
of
35
feet
in
height,
which
is
typical
for
this
area.
I
would
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have.
This
is
a
approximately
2400
square
feet
and
it
does
qualify
for
the
three
lots
to
be
re-established,
as
originally
planted
through.
I
I
H
H
C
O
My
name
is
nathan
hagan.
I
don't
often
come
to
pm
meetings,
so
I'm
going
to
be
up
a
couple
times
tonight.
O
Last
year,
my
birthday,
I
came
to
council
and
I
asked
for
us
to
legalize
triplexes
citywide,
and
this
is
not
exactly
what
I
had
in
mind,
but
I
do
want
to
say
that
this
is
two
new
families
that
come
to
tampa
and-
and
I
think
that
that's
a
very
good
reason
to
support
this
very
basic
thing,
along
the
lines
of
being
a
very
basic
thing.
O
I
I
hope
that
when
we
are
evaluating
our
land
development
code
in
the
future,
we
ask
ourselves
why
this
type
of
thing
needs
to
be
voted
on
by
full
council.
I
know
we
have
a
backlog
of
projects
and
I
know
there's
concerns
about
liability.
So
just
something
to
consider.
Thank
you.
Thank.
C
O
C
C
C
Please
raise
your
right
hand
and
we'll
swear
you
in
yes,.
C
C
So
my
name
is
chen
yuru
and
actually
I'm
a
university
student
and
to
attend
your
meeting
so
yeah.
I
forgot
to
to
send
the
email
that
I
I
don't
actually
nothing
to
speak.
C
Sorry
about
that,
thank
you
very
much.
We
appreciate
you
being
here
yeah.
Thank
you
all
right,
the
other
speaker
is
they
logged
off?
Okay.
So
that's
it
anybody
else
in
the
public.
If
not,
do
you
have
any
rebuttal,
sir?.
H
L
H
C
L
I'm
gonna
have
to
let
me,
through
this
bit
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
6107
south
fourth
street
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classifications,
rs,
60,
residential
single
family
to
rs,
50,
residential
single
family,
providing
an
effective
date.
L
C
C
L
I
find
that,
based
on
competent
and
substantial
evidence
found
in
staff
reports,
applicant
reports,
testimony
that
that
establishes
this
is
consistent
with
land
use,
objective
9.2,
which
is
intended
to
ensure
that
there's
an
adequate
amount
of
land
consistent
with
housing
policy
1.34,
which
encourages
new
housing
on
vacant
and
under-utilized
land
and
compliance
with
the
land
development
code
proposed
use,
promotes
the
efficient
and
sustainable
use
of
land
and
infrastructure.
L
C
E
C
And
mr
hagen,
I
heard
what
you
mentioned,
it's
something
I've
been
thinking
about
and
I
may
bring
it
up
tonight
or
next
thursday.
So
thank
you.
Sir.
All
right
item
number
four
was
taken
care
of.
We
go
to
item
number
five
same.
B
This
is
being
heard
for
the
proposed
rezoning
at
401
and
505
north
rome
avenue
and
1517
west
gray,
street
proposal
rezoning
from
pd
plan
development
and
ig
industrial
general
2pd,
planned
development,
residential
multifamily,
storefront,
residential
with
business
professional
office
and
retail
sales,
also
business
professional
office
and
retail
sales
I'll
now
pass
it
along
to
our
planning
commission.
Thank.
J
Danny
collins,
again
with
your
planning
commission
staff,
I've
been
sworn
in.
Our
next
case
is
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically
in
the
west
campus
urban
village.
J
The
closest
public
recreation
facility
is
bill,
abrams
park,
which
is
located
within
a
half
mile
to
the
northwest
of
the
site.
The
closest
transit
stop
is
located
a
quarter
mile
to
the
south
of
the
subject.
Site
stop
provides
service
to
downtown,
tampa
and
tampa
international
airport
subject.
Site
is
within
a
level
c
evacuation
zone.
J
Here
is
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject's
site
and
surrounding
properties.
You'll
see
the
subject.
Site
is
generally
north
of
west
fix
streets
in
east
and
north
rome,
avenue
and
south
of
west
has
street
you'll
see
the
surrounding
development
patterns
predominantly
non-residential
and
character.
There
are
some
multi-family
uses
to
the
north
as
well
as
to
the
east
of
the
subject.
Site
here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
Currently,
the
subject
site
has
three
land
use.
Designations
subject:
site
has
is
designated
cmu35,
gmu,
24
and
r20.
J
The
r20
portion
is
at
the
southeast
portion
of
the
site.
You'll
see
kind
of
that
development
pattern
kind
of
is
consistent
along
north
rome
avenue
that
gmu
24
is
directly
to
the
northwest
of
the
subject.
Sites
cmu
35,
is
to
the
to
the
west
and
east,
and
then
there
is
some
parcels
designated
residential,
20
scattered
along
west
big
to
the
south
of
the
subject
site
on
the
republicans
proposed
project
in
the
west.
J
Tampa
urban
village
is
in
an
area
of
the
central
tampa
planning
district
that
has
experienced
a
surge
of
growth
over
the
last
decade
project.
The
project
accommodates
the
planned
levels
of
housing,
growth
with
increase
of
density
with
and
with
the
inclusion
of
neighborhood
retail
space
flight
industrial
development
pattern
formally
defined.
This
surrounding
area,
however,
is
transitioning
through
more
of
a
mixed-use
urban
neighborhood
comprehensive
plan
supports
this
transition
and,
as
it
encourages
a
mixed
use,
development
pattern
and
infill
development
on
an
underutilized
site.
J
Further,
the
west
tampa
urban
village,
the
west
camp
are
villages
within
proximity
to
employment
and
transit
to
community
assets,
that
the
comprehensive
plan
encourages
increasing
housing
opportunities
near
proposed
pd,
further
several
components
and
policy
directions
of
the
comprehensive
plan
within
the
mixed-use
corridors.
The
comprehensive
plan
incurs
as
a
mixture
of
uses
and
density,
to
support
pedestrian
activity
and
to
enhance
the
west
tampa
urban
village
urban
nature.
J
The
proposed
pd
accomplished
this
by
placing
the
building
close
to
the
sidewalks,
with
entryways
to
the
retail
spaces,
stairs
that
lead
to
the
residential
units
that
face
the
public
right
of
life
planning.
Commission
staff
request
that
between
first
and
second
reading,
the
following
revisions
be
made,
the
first
revision
is
to
provide
the
acreage
of
each
future
land
use
designation
on
the
site
plan.
J
Second,
revision
is
to
clearly
indicate
on
the
site
plan
the
location
of
all
future
land
use
designations.
The
third
revision
is
to
clarify
the
total
acreage
of
the
subject
site
and
the
fourth
revision
is
to
provide
the
total
square
footage
of
the
entire
development
for
phase
one
phase
two
and
the
development
as
a
whole.
Based
on
the
above
considerations,
the
planning
commission
staff
finds
the
request
consistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
This
concludes
my
presentation
available
for
any
questions.
B
B
B
B
Now
the
applicant
is
requesting
phase
two,
which
contains
a
lot
area
of
one
point:
one
six
acres
or
sixty
thousand
seven
hundred
and
ninety
eight
square
feet
in
size.
The
provo
that's
right.
The
proposed
building
itself
has
an
area
of
52
874
square
feet
and
the
commercial
space
out
of
that
has
3
863
square
feet.
B
B
Now,
as
we're
going
to
look
at
the
site
plan
here
now,
there's
two
options:
option
one
and
option
two:
both
have
to
do
with
solid
waste.
Solid
waste
prefers
in-house
council.
Solid
waste
prefers
option
one
option.
One
here
is
preferred
by
solid
waste
because
it
both
is
consistent
for
collection
and
is
out
of
the
right-of-way
and
easements,
and
also
allows
for
solid
waste
vehicles.
Maneuvering
internal
to
the
site
option
two.
B
B
Okay,
the
proposed
project
is
for
76
residential
multi-family
units,
also
for
the
four
storefronts
non-residential
uses
with
offspace
business
and
professional
office,
and
retail
uses
also
is
for
two
business
and
professional
office
and
retail
uses
on
the
ground
floor.
The
proposed
maximum
building
height
is
55
feet
in
height
or
also
four
stories.
B
B
B
B
B
B
A
Go
back
to
the
solid
waste
situation,
all
right.
K
P
P
What
we're
proposing
tonight
originally
we
came
in
and
we're
going
to
propose
11
111
residential
units,
but
after
meeting
with
neighbor
members-
and
you
know
different
stakeholders
in
the
neighborhood-
the
hyde
park
north
high
park
association,
we
realized
how
important
the
mixed
use
was
to
to
everybody
in
the
neighborhood.
And
so
we
went
back.
We
redesigned
the
project
and
we
maxed
out
the
ground
floor
commercial
space
with
the
parking
that
we
could.
You
know,
use
or
could
get
into
the
project
without
asking
for
a
waiver
on
the
parking
code.
P
P
This
is
really
known
as
kind
of
the
hole
in
the
donut
for
a
lot
of
folks.
I
don't
know
if
you
can
see
in
the
middle
of
of
of
all
those
blocks:
we've
developed
four
and
a
half
blocks
around
this
warehouse,
and
so
the
the
hole
in
the
donut
is
this
property
at
505,
north
rome
avenue.
We
could
please
go
the
next
slide.
P
We
came
into
the
neighborhood
12
years
ago.
You
know
this.
Neighborhood
was
in
decline,
we'd
just
come
out
of
the
great
recession.
There
was
a
lot
of
crime
in
the
neighborhood.
There
was
no
lighting
on
the
street.
I
mean
people
were
scared
to
go
out
at
night.
People
were
afraid
to
be
out
on
the
street.
P
Sometimes
even
during
the
day
we
came
in
and
we
tried
to
create
a
what
I
call
neighborhood
building
type
of
philosophy
and
we
tried
to
create
a
sense
of
streetscape
and
we
came
up
with
a
template
streepscape
that
in
in
the
first
phase
that
we
did,
that
we
tried
to
emulate
and
try
to
get
others
to
emulate
throughout
the
neighborhood.
We
also
met
with
our
neighbors
and
tried
to
develop
great
relationships
with
our
neighbors
and
listen
to
what
they
wanted
to
do
and
wanted
us
to
do
and
what
the
neighborhood
really
needed.
P
So
in
phase
one
of
noho
flats,
which
is
what
you
see
up
there
in
the
center
picture,
they
asked
us
to
create
a
public
park
which
we
did
and
that
public
park
is
there.
Today
it
is
maintained
by
the
noho
flats
property
and
it's
open
to
the
public
at
all
times,
but
it
is
privately
owned,
but
it's
open.
P
It
has
an
easement
over
it
and
it
can
cannot
be
used
for
anything
except
for
public
park
going
forward,
and
then
we
also
came
in
and
we
put
all
the
overhead
power
lines
you
know
under
underground.
We
made
a
lot
of
improvements
in
the
storm
water
system,
the
the
total
water
system,
because
there
were
a
lot
of
lines
collapsing
in
the
area
there
was
flooding
in
the
area.
P
We
did
come
in
and
do
streetscape
improvements,
and
then
we
did
put
in
the
street
lighting,
which
is
that
you
see
around
all
the
buildings
over
there.
So
all
the
street
lighting
in
this
in
this
neighborhood
that
you
see
on
the
post
is,
is
actually
privately
owned
and
maintained
and
it's
operated
and
the
electricity
is
paid
for
by
the
community
which
the
you
know,
the
lighting
of
bites.
P
If
you
please
go
to
the
next
slide,
so
again,
we
were
trying
to
create
a
more
pedestrian,
friendly
and
more
secure
neighborhood
again
we
figured
that
if
we
could
activate
the
street,
create
more
pedestrian
use,
create
a
safer
environment
with
street
lighting
and
whatnot
that
we
could
improve
the
neighborhood.
You
know
we
came
in
put
in
bike
racks,
you
know
public
benches,
trash,
receptacles
and
great
landscaping,
and
then
also
you
know,
dog
dog
maintenance
stations.
P
So
when
people
are
out
walking
their
dogs
again,
we
maintain
those
privately
and
so
just
trying
to
create
a
more
pedestrian
friendly.
You
know
neighborhood.
We
also
did
on
the
ground
floor
of
our
units,
which
really
I
hadn't
seen
much
of
this
being
done
in
tampa.
I'd
seen
it
in
other
markets,
but
we
we
did
front
porches
to
allow
our
residents
to
have
direct
access
to
the
street.
P
Now
you
know
it's
a
new
urban
thing
that
everybody's
trying
to
do,
but
this
is
you
know,
12
13
years
ago,
and
it
really
helped
to
activate
the
street,
especially
when
we
got
street
lighting
in
and
so
at
night.
You
know
in
this
neighborhood
I
feel
really
proud.
When
I
go
down
there
go
to
willa's
or
roman
fig,
and
I
see
people
walking
around
and
you
know
walking
their
dogs
and
it's
just.
It's
just
got
a
completely
different
feel
I
had
12
years
ago.
P
If
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
so
we
also
put
in
about
200
on-street
parking
spaces
in
the
neighborhood,
and
we've
tried
to
give
back.
You
know
doing
those
public
improvements
and
if
this
project
is
approved,
we
plan
to
do
this
signature
corner
at
the
corner
of
rome
and
carmen
and
it'd
be
sort
of
like
a
small
little
public
park.
You
know
we
plan
to
program
it
with
seasonal.
You
know
flowers
and
and
whatnot
we've
got
benches
there
where
people
can
gather
just
thought,
it'd
be
a
nice.
P
You
know
nice
accent
for
the
neighborhood
next
slide.
Please
so
again.
The
first
phase
was
noho
flats
with
zane
mentioned
earlier,
and
we
did
next.
The
next
slide,
please
havana
square,
which
is
across
the
street.
This
is
four
stories
with
a
central
wrap
parking
garage.
Next
slide,
please
and
then
the
last
project
we
did
was
the
gray,
and
you
know,
with
the
gray
we
kept
getting.
You
know
these
requests
from
the
neighbors
to
please
put
in
a
mixed
use
at
that
time.
P
P
Finally,
I
think
turned
a
corner
where,
where
we
can
support
the
retail-
and
so
we
put
in
the
convenience
store
and
that's
the
duckweed
urban
grocery
and
they're
doing
great
and
we're
excited
to
see
them,
it's
a
great
addition
to
the
neighborhood,
and
I
think
it's
just
you
know.
It
was
great
that
that
we
got
that
push
to
to
do
to
do
that,
use
because
it's
what
the
neighborhood
really
needed
next
slide,
please
so
phase
two
is
actually
comprised
of
two
separate
little
parcels.
P
We've
got
the
main
parcel
that
we're
talking
about
where
we
plan
to
build
the
building
and
in
the
southeast
corner
we
were
previously
approved
for
four
residential
units
and
six
garages
and
we're
proposing
to
eliminate
those
units
and
to
do
18
surface
parking
spaces
there
and
so
I'll
come
back
to
that
later.
But
I
just
wanted
to
call
that
out
so
you'll
understand.
You
know
when
we
explain
one
of
the
waivers.
You
know
why
we're
asking
for
that.
If
we
could
please
go
to
the
next
slide
please.
P
So
this
is
just
an
elevation
on
rome,
but
I'm
gonna
come
back
to
this,
so
we
can
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
so
our
site
plan.
This
is
the
garage
level
and
the
residents
actually
enter
through
the
gates
off
of
carmen
to
the
right
and
so
the
enter
the
residential
entrance
to
the
garage
is
to
the
right
of
the
garage,
and
then
the
commercial
entrance
is
off
of
rome,
and
so
only
the
commercial
will
access
on
and
off
of
rome
and
they
have
their
own
separate
parking.
P
So
we
found
on
these
projects
that
oftentimes,
when
we
do
mix
the
parking
that
our
residents
park
in
the
commercial
area
and
the
commercial
park
and
the
residence
residential
area,
and
then
there's
not
enough
parking
for
everybody.
So
so
we
do
separate
the
parking
and
then
this
does
show
the
option
with
the
trash
compactor
on
on
rome.
As
we
talked
about
earlier,
there
are
two
options
for
the
trash
compactor
and,
of
course
our
residents
would
prefer
to
not
have
it
in
their
green
space
area
and
have
it
serviced
from
rome.
P
I
know
solid
waste
would
prefer
to
have
it,
but
we
do
have
it
if
we
are
allowed
to
put
it
on
rome,
we
will
have
it
where
the
truck
can
get
completely
off
the
street
to
service
the
compactor
and
then,
of
course
they
will
have
to
back
out
onto
rome.
So
I
understand
that
concern,
but
I
think
for
the
use
of
the
green
space.
It's
a
lot
better
to
not
have
the
compactor
in
the
middle
of,
but
anyway,
next
slide,
please.
P
This
is
the
deck
above
the
parking.
It
has
76
residential
units,
as
I
said,
around
a
landscape
parking
landscape,
courtyard
and
then
the
large
square
to
the
right
is
actually
the
new
fitness
center.
That
would
service
both
phases.
If
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
this
is
a
just
a
colored
rendering
of
what
that
would
look
like
up
there:
lots
of
landscape
planters,
commercial
kitchen,
different
seating
areas
with
fire
tables
and
sofas
and
tables
where
people
can
gather
and
then,
of
course,
the
new
fitness
center
there
to
the
right
next
slide,
please.
P
But
you
know
pilates
yoga
seminars,
you
know
lots
of
different
things
can
go
there.
So
I'd
like
to
explain
the
waiver
explain
the
waiver
requests.
The
first
waiver
request
for
natural
resources
is
a
waiver
of
the
green
space.
You
know
trying
to
reduce
it
from
the
350
square
feet
per
unit.
You
know
this
is
really
a
requirement
you
see
out
in
the
suburbs:
it's
not
an
urban.
You
know.
I
see
this
in
no
urban
code
anywhere
and
you
know
in
fact
pasco
county
is
at
435.
P
You
know
a
unit
which
is
pretty
excessive
out
there,
but
anyway
phase
one
was
granted
a
waiver
down
to
108
square
feet
per
unit
we
can
provide
because
of
the
vacated,
right-of-way
and
gray
street.
We
can.
We
can
make
a
green
space
area
there,
that's
fairly
large,
and
so
the
waiver
request
here
is
only
77
1552
square
feet
which
brings
us
down
to
about
248
square
feet
per
unit.
Next
slide,
please.
P
P
We
proposed
to
lowe's
phase
two
in
the
same
manner
from
the
parking
area
to
the
rear,
and
so
that's
why
we're
asking
for
the
waiver
of
the
loading
area
and
keep
in
mind
most
of
our
move-ins
about
90
percent
of
them
are
with
like
box
trucks
and
even
people
using
their
own
pickups,
and
things
like
that.
We
do
not
have
a
lot
of
big
moving
trucks
that
come
into
our
projects.
P
Then
the
waiver
of
the
eight
foot
vua
buffer,
goes
back
to
the
southeast
corner
and
if
you
look
at
the
picture
on
the
lower
left
hand
side,
that's
the
existing
condition
that
we
have
right
now
and
to
meet
that
buffer
requirement.
I
would
have
to
move
the
fencing
back
about
four
to
four
to
six
feet
on
one
side
and
four
feet
on
another
side,
and
then
we
would
lose
half
of
the
18
spaces
that
we
can
get
by
keeping
the
fencing
in
the
same
spot.
P
P
Unfortunately,
on
the
phase,
two
property
are
pretty
much
located
right,
where
we
have
to
put
the
building
in
order
to
make
the
project
work,
and
you
know
the
parking
areas
and
so
we're
asking-
and
I
don't
know
you
can't
really
do
this,
but
I
I
would
like
you
to
consider
looking
at
the
fact
that
if
you
put
phase
one
and
phase
two
together,
we
have
a
total
of
about
218
trees
and
we're
going
to
be
retaining
196
or
so
of
those
trees,
and
so
the
where
the
retainage
is
about
85
to
90
percent.
P
If
you
look
at
it
in
aggregate
but
on
the
phase
2
site,
we
do
have
to
to
remove
all
the
trees
to
make
this
project
work.
We
are
willing
to
commit
tonight,
even
though
it's
not
part
of
the
code,
just
like
you
know,
relocating
trees.
I
used
to
relocate
trees
all
the
time
and
we
can't
really
look
at
them
anymore.
It's
not
part
of
the
code,
but
what
we
are
willing
to
commit
tonight
to
to
re,
install
double
the
caliper
of
oak
trees
that
are
replaced.
P
So
this
is
what
the
project
would
look
like
with
the
residential
up
above
the
ground
floor,
commercial
with
those
eight
inch
oaks
around
going
down.
Rome
avenue
next
slide.
Please,
and
then
this
is
looking
down
carmen
with
that
kind
of
signature
corner
there,
the
corner
of
carmen
and
rome
and
again
you
know
the
oak
trees
going
down
carmen
next
slide.
Please,
and
so
in
conclusion,
oh
actually
a
couple
of
clean
up
things,
but
let
me
just
conclude
and
I'll
come
back
to
this
conclusion.
We
ask
you
fleece
for
your
your
approval
here.
P
P
The
cleanup
I
want
to
talk
about
is
there's
a
scrivener's
error
in
our
our
plans
and
our
architect
incorrectly
noted
that
the
retail
space
was
to
be
divided
into
four
spaces.
That's
not
true
we're
planning
to
build
it
as
one
giant
space
and
then,
as
we
lease
it,
to
divide
it
based
on
what
the
market
tells
us.
P
And
then
you
know
as
we
lease
them,
we
we
build
it
out
as
the
tenant
needs
and
then
also
I
forgot
my
presentation
that
we
are
planning
to
install
10
ev
chargers
in
the
project,
something
that's
important
to
us
and
we
we
we
do
this
on
every
project
and
we're
committing
to
do
10
ev
for
ev
chargers
on
this
project.
K
Very
quickly,
david
mechanic
again
just
to
clarify
the
two
options
on
the
solid
waste.
We
are
asking
council's
approval
to
approve
both
options.
Option
two
would
only
be
utilized
if
council
subsequently
agrees
to
a
release
of
the
easement
in
the
right-of-way,
so
we
would
just
ask
that
council
approve
both
options
and
then
in
the
future.
If
council
approves
the
release
of
easement,
we
would
implement
option
two
and
also
just
for
the
record.
K
C
F
Accept
both
yes,
sir,
it
with
with
hopes
that
this
easement
might
work
in
your
favor.
What
what
is
the
difference
between
the
plants?
I'm
talking
square
footage
right
of
ways
setbacks
is.
Is
it
that
big
of
a
difference,
I
I'd
hate
to
see
us
say,
okay,
sure,
we'll
approve
both
and
then
a
year
down
the
line
that
that
easement
comes
through
and
all
of
a
sudden,
your
designs
are
exorbitant
absorbent.
P
I
can
answer
that,
actually
it's
the
vacating
of
a
couple
of
easements
that
are
in
the
right
of
way
that
would
determine
the
location
of
that
that
dumpster.
So
there
is
a
water
line
that
needs
to
be
vaca
removed
and
the
city's
approved
that
there's
a
sanitary
sewer
line
that
needs
a
new
easement
over
it
and
there's
a
storm
water
line
that
needs
to
be
relocated.
P
Upon
doing
that,
city
staff
has
agreed
to
release
the
easement
that
would
that's
preventing
us
from
putting
the
compactor
on
the
rome
avenue
side.
So
it's
really
a
question
of
aesthetics
from
you
know
where
we
think
it's
better
to
have
that
service
area
and
we
feel
like
we
can
screen
it
from
room
with
really
nice
big
gates,
and
you
know,
have
just
a
service
area
there
and
it's
a
much
easier
access
than
the
trucks
having
to
come
in
and-
and
you
know,
maneuver
through
the
whole
parking
area.
So
you
know
solid
waste.
Determines
one
option.
P
Is
you
know
one
they're
going
to
improve
and
one
that
they're
not
going
to
prove
in
permitting?
Then
we
would
go.
You
know
with
whatever
option
they
they
want,
and
I
had
not
heard
from
solid
waste
that
they
had
a
preference.
You
know
they
they
had
approved
both
as
far
as
I
knew,
if
it's
approved
tonight,
to
give
us
either
option.
I.
F
Just
want
the
public
to
know
that
there's
not
going
to
be
an
additional.
You
know
10
000
square
foot
being
built
or
anything
like
that.
P
C
O
Nathan,
hagan
again,
I
live
within
the
visual
overlay
of
this
one,
so
this
is
the
first
time
I'm
really
saying
yes,
literally
in
my
backyard,
about
the
project,
but
I
just
want
to
point
out.
This
is
the
the
best
bike
infrastructure
that
we
have
in
the
city
of
tampa
is
on
this
road
that
north
that
noho
flats
are
on
with
the
green
spine
and
then
now
with
the
west
west
river
riverwalk
extension,
which
I
know
didn't
really
predate
the
planning
for
this.
O
We
can
think
about
that.
There's
a
lot
of
affordable
housing
that
could
have
gone
in
there,
which
I
know
our
code
doesn't
really
incentivize
properly
here.
But
a
lot
of
trade-offs
are
making
here
and
we're
putting
cars
above
above
people
in
this
case,
and
I
also
want
to
commend
them
for
the
mixed
use.
I
think
that's
really
critical
for
the
neighborhood
of
someone
who
lives
there.
I've
really
appreciated
santora's
pizza
is
a
huge
asset
for
me
and
it's
been
life-changing.
O
Willows
has
been
incredible,
and
so
has
the
roman
fig
have
been
great
to
have
in
the
neighborhood.
So
thank
you.
Where
were
you
12
years
ago,
and
I
was
trying
to
get
parking
waivers.
F
C
C
K
Yes,
sir
dave
mechanic
very
briefly,
I
would
just
ask
if
council
is
inclined
to
approve
this,
that
you
allow
us
to
remove
the
scrivener's
error
so
that
the
commercial
space
is
not
specifically
limited
to
four
units.
The
square
footage
remains
the
same.
We're
not
enlarging
that
and
the
other
is.
We
would
respectfully
request
that
you
allow
both
options
for
the
trash
compactor
and
thank
you
very
much
for
your
consideration.
K
C
A
File
number
rec
dash
21-46
orders
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration,
ordinance,
rezoning
property
in
the
general
city
of
401
and
505
north
rome,
avenue
and
1570
west
great
street
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
what
we
described
in
section,
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
pd
plan
development
and
ig
industrial
general
to
pd,
plant
development,
residential
multifamily,
storefront,
residential
with
business,
professional
office
and
retail
sales,
business,
professional
professional
office.
And
we
also
provide
an
effective
date.
A
A
The
proposed
development
has
shown
incitem
or
encourages
development
that
inappropriate
and
location
character
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
C
Don't
forget
the
substituted
revision
substitute.
A
A
E
C
Q
E
B
Thank
you
so
much
zane
hussain
development
coordination
agenda
item
number
seven
case:
rez
21-99,
this
being
her
first
reading
at
for
5242
and
5250
east
broadway
avenue
proposed
resuming
from
pd
planned
development
to
pd
plan
development,
residential
multifamily
and
strip
shopping
center,
with
all
ci
uses
I'll
now
pass
along
to
our
planning
commission.
Mr.
J
Collins,
danny
collins,
with
your
planning
commission
staff
at
monslarnin.
Our
next
case
is
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
the
eastside
commercial
neighborhood
oak
park.
Is
the
closest
public
recreation
facility
being
located
just
north
of
the
subject
site
the
terminus
of
heart
route
8
is
50
is
50th
street,
which
is
0.4
miles
to
the
west
of
the
subject
site.
This
route
connects
to
the
subject
site,
downtown,
tampa
and
westfield
brandon
town
center.
The
site
is
within
a
evacuation
zone
d.
J
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
the
surrounding
properties,
you'll
see
it
on
broadway
is
developed
with
predominantly
non-residential
uses
as
you
move
north
along
north
54th
streets
and
just
north
of
the
site.
You
get
into
more
a
residential
area.
There
are
also
residents
west
and
east
of
the
subject
site.
J
The
southern
portion
of
the
site,
adjacent
to
east
broadway
avenue,
is
recognized
under
the
tu
before
future
land
use
designation.
The
tu-24
designation
is
the
predominant
land
use
category
along
this
portion
of
east
broadway
avenue
and
then
north
of
the
site
is
residential.
20.
J
This
drive-through
will
not
negatively
affect
the
surrounding
uses
portion
of
the
subject
sites.
A
designated
residential
20
proposes
neighborhood
20
uses,
I'm
sorry,
neighborhood
commercial
uses
and
104
dwelling
units
neighborhood
commercial
uses
can
be
considered
an
r20
future
land
use
designation
at
the
site
commercial
location
criteria,
while
the
site
is
not
subject
to
commercial
locational
criteria.
J
Since
it's
already
been
approved
for
neighborhood
commercial
uses
under
an
existing
pe
zoning,
it
does
meet
the
criteria
since
the
site
has
access
to
a
roadway
designated
as
a
collector,
roadway
or
higher
comprehensive
plan
seeks
to
ensure
an
adequate
supply
of
housing
for
tampa's
growing
population,
and
it
also
encourages
providing
housing
through
the
redevelopment
of
vacant
vacant
or
underutilized
sites.
Proposed
beauty
will
provide
more
housing
to
serve
the
needs
of
tampa's
projected
population.
J
It
would
also
utilize
a
vacant
site
and
will
provide
goods
and
services
for
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
Lastly,
the
pd
is
proposing
eternal
pedestrian
connect
connections
to
the
multi-family
uses
to
the
commercial
uses
proposed
along
east
broadway
avenue,
which
is
consistent
with
the
policy
direction.
The
comprehensive
plan,
the
pd,
is
also
providing
pedestrian
access
from
the
front
door
of
the
multi-family
buildings
to
internal
pedestrian
connections,
providing
pedestrian
access
throughout
the
site.
In
our
report,
we
provide
us
suggested
revisions
to
be
made
between
first
and
second
reading.
J
B
B
This
is
approved
for
18
multi-family
residential
units
with
18
buildings,
with
an
associated
clubhouse
and
maintenance
building
and
10
400
square
feet
of
strip
shopping
center
to
the
south.
With
two
buildings
allowing
all
commercial
intensive
uses,
the
site
was
never
developed
and
it's
still
currently
vacant.
B
Beautiful
all
right,
we
have
three
proposed
waivers
here
all
to
do
with
natural
resources
and
transportation
engineering,
yeah
parking.
You
have
the
required
use
to
use
buffer
and
masonry
wall,
and
then
also
you
have
the
50
retention
of
non-wooded
lots
over
one
acre
to
34.
B
P
B
B
The
residential
apartment
community
will
be
58
282
square
feet,
which
includes
13
residential
buildings,
an
office
and
also
a
storage
area.
The
shoppings
plaza
to
the
south
will
comprise
of
two
retail
buildings
for
a
total
of
10
400
square
feet
now
to
the
north,
east
and
west.
There
are
a
combination
of
detached,
semi-detached
and
also
multi-family
residences,
all
within
the
rm16
zoning
district
and
to
the
south
you'll
see
here.
You'll
have
commercial
uses
on
both
sides
of
east
broadway,
with
all
ci
uses.
B
The
proposed
maximum
building
height
for
the
residential
multi-family
is
25
feet
in
height.
The
proposed
height
for
the
plaza
is
also
25
feet.
In
height,
vehicle
access
comes
from
east
14th
avenue,
as
well
as
broadway
east
broadway
avenue.
A
total
of
235
parking
spaces
are
required
and
the
applicant
is
providing
222,
which
calls
for
a
waiver.
B
As
I
went
out
to
the
site,
I
played
a
great
game
of
frogger:
try
not
to
get
hit
with
cars,
but
this
is
what
I
can
do
without
going
into
the
gated
community.
So
you
have
a
site
here:
vacant
parcel
land,
west
of
the
site.
You
have
those
residential
homes,
as
we
talked
about
mixed
of
multi-family
d-chats,
semi-detached.
B
B
Upon
review,
development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
inconsistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
land
developing
code.
It
was
found
inconsistent
due
to
transportation
and
natural
resources.
Modifications
to
the
site
plan
will
be
needed
to
be
made
between
first
and
second
reading
and
also
follow
the
revision
sheet.
C
R
Good
evening,
travis
hills,
5620's
temple,
terrace,
east
fowler,
avenue,
temple,
terrace,
sweet
four.
R
R
Submission
was
quite
conservative
and
over
time
and
looking
at
the
conditions
and
the
community
and
the
changes
etc,
it
was
decided
that
we
would
and
and
this
what
we're
asking
for
is
by
far
not
the
extent
of
what
we
could
have
asked
for
on
five
acres.
You
know,
as
we've
seen
with
with
other
proposals,
so
basically
we're
still
remaining
conservative
in
our
request.
R
As
far
as
the
parking
waiver
is
concerned,
it
is
an
overall
waiver
for
the
entire
site
and
there's
a
little
bit
of
that
number.
R
So
I
respectfully
request
that
you
would
consider
approval
of
our
submission
all
right.
Any
questions
for
the
gentleman.
L
R
Yeah,
actually,
I
I
do
believe
that
we
did
submit
for
a
masonry
wall.
I
think
there
might
have
been
some
miscommunication,
I
think,
is
on
the
site
plan
as
a
masonry
wall.
I
think
where
the
wood
fence
came
in
was
on
the
residential
perimeter,
so
basically
that
would
be
to
the
roadway
to
other
residential.
F
The
city
says:
235
space
is
a
222
six
percent
reduction,
but
when
you
turn
it
the
other
way,
it
says
225
to
22,
and
I
looked
at
that-
I
said
three
spaces
and
six
percent,
so
I
believe
that
the
front
side
might
be
correct,
but
the
one
you
haven't
read
is
incorrect.
Am
I
correct?
I.
R
And
that,
basically,
is
what
I
was
alluding
to
with
the
original
number
was
the
smaller
number
based
on
knowledge
of
how
that
restaurant
is
going
to
be
configured
and
what
the
real
requirements
are
going
to
possibly
be
so
with
that
they
just
did
a
little
bit
more
buffer.
Just
in
case
those
square
footages
of
use
on
the
inside
of
the
building
become
maximized.
F
And
I
agree
with
council:
remember
heard
that
the
the
the
the
wood
you
have
a
masonry
eight-foot
wall
and
then
it
drops
down
to
six
foot
wood.
Am
I
correct.
R
F
A
F
From
the
moisture
in
the
ground
up
yeah,
it's
just
something
that
you
ought
to
consider
just
for
missionaries.
F
C
L
Ma'am,
I
guess
I
want
to
resolve
that
the
issue
between.
Q
L
And
masonry,
so
are
we
agreeing
to
to
change
that.
R
So
are
we
talking
about
the
perimeter
of
the
entire
residential
area
because
the
wood,
the
wood,
basically
that
was
being
proposed
and
that's
not
necessarily
what
would
be
used,
but
that
is
not
uncommon
in
that
particular
area
and
neighborhood.
If
you
look
at
what
it's
actually
buffering
from
it's
not
buffering
between
the
residential
and
the
commercial,
it's
just
an
exterior.
L
Yes,
yes,
I'm
yeah,
I'm
fine
with
the
masonry
between
the
commercial,
and
I
mean
yes,
councilman
miranda
is
correct
that
wood
doesn't
last,
but
understanding
that
many
neighbors
between
residential
and
residential
do
use
that
that
does
make
sense.
Thank
you
all
right.
Thank
you.
All
right.
B
Yes,
sir,
for
the
record,
just
wanna
stay
for
the
record,
so
that
waiver
number
two
alluding
to
to
reduce
a
required
15
use
to
use
buffer
and
a
six
foot
tall
masonry
wall
to
eight
feet
and
a
six
foot
tall
wood
fence
to
the
west
has
been
requested
by
natural
resources
and
that
will
still
be
valid
for
the
second
reading.
I
Sir,
thank
you.
I'd
like
to
move
file
number
rec
2199.
I
Objectives
and
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
including
the
proposed
rezoning,
complies
with
land
use
policy
9.8.4
in
housing
policy
1.3.4,
which
seek
to
ensure
an
adequate
supply
of
housing
for
tampa's
growth
population
and
encourage
providing
housing
through
the
redevelopment
of
vacant
or
under
utilized
sites.
The
proposed
rezoning
achieves
housing
policies,
1.3.1
and
1.3.4
by
utilizing
a
vacant
site
and
providing
goods
and
services
for
the
surrounding
neighborhood,
and
the
proposed
development,
as
shown
on
the
site
plan,
promotes
or
encourages
development
that
is
appropriate
in
in
location,
character
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood
and.
I
C
B
Thanks
so
much
zane
hussain
development
coordination
case
rez
22-03.
This
is
being
heard
for
the
rezoning
at
1304
east
23rd
avenue
proposed
result
from
pd
plan
development.
2Pd,
planned
development,
residential
single
family
detached
I'll
now
pass
it
along
to
our
planning
commission,
mr
collins.
J
J
The
heading
should
be
rezoning
2203.
Yes,
our
next
case
is
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
the
vm
keyboard
neighborhood.
The
subject
site
is
also
within
the
east.
Tampa
urban
village,
because
cascadin
park
is
the
closest
public
recreation
facility
being
located
approximately
750
feet
south
of
the
subject
site
closest
transit.
Stop
is
located
approximately
500
feet,
north
east
of
the
subject
site
on
north
14th
street.
J
J
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
the
surrounding
properties,
you'll
see
it's
just
north
west
of
ava
republic
of
cuba
and
east
23rd
avenue
it's
on
the
old
sac.
The
surrounding
area
is
predominantly
residential
in
character.
There
is
a
multi-family
uses
to
the
south
of
the
site.
There
are
detached
single-family
residents
to
the
north
and
east
of
the
subject.
Site
here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map
on
the
subject
site.
It
is
within
the
residential
10
future
land
use
designation.
J
The
r10
is
to
the
north
east,
east
and
east
of
the
subject
site.
There
is
a
parcel
recognized
under
the
residential
20
directly
to
the
west
of
the
site
and
then
there's
a
parcel,
I
believe,
is
recognized
under
the
public
semi
public
directly
to
the
north
of
the
subject
site.
J
Finding
commission
staff
reviewed
the
request
upon
no
adverse
impacts
to
the
surrounding
area.
A
large
parcel
designated
with
the
r35
future
land
use
designation
is
present
to
the
southwest
of
the
subject
site.
It
has
been
developed
with
multi-family
uses
to
the
east.
Our
single-family
detached
homes
developed
under
the
residential
10
usual
land
use
designation.
J
This
portion
of
east
23rd
avenue
north
15th
street
has
an
existing
density
of
8.61
units
per
acre
and
that's
based
on
16
sites
proposed
pd
would
allow
for
one
single-family
detached
residence
at
an
overall
density
of
7.69
units
per
acre,
which
is
consistent
with
the
density
anticipated
under
the
r10
future.
Land
use,
designation
and
also
below
the
existing
density
of
the
block
requests
would
also
allow
for
a
development
that
is
similar
at
a
similar,
informed
height
scale
to
the
surrounding
residential
uses.
J
The
request
supports
many
of
the
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
as
it
relates
to
housing
the
city's
population.
The
tampa
comprehensive
plan
encourages
new
housing
on
vacant
and
underutilized
land
to
ensure
that
an
adequate
supply
of
housing
is
available
to
meet
the
needs
of
tampa's
present
and
future
populations.
J
B
Thanks
so
much
zan
hussein
development
coordination
case
rez
22-03,
the
applicant
is
eugene,
anthony
costa
for
the
location
at
1304,
east
23rd
avenue
this
being
proposed,
rezoning
from
pd
z,
82-91
for
the
record
to
plan
development,
residential
single-family
detached
now.
This
was
approved
as
a
pdz
82-91
for
a
part
of
a
hotel
or
sorry
a
hospital
expansion.
B
Now
the
site
was
never
developed
on
and
the
land
here
is
still
vacant.
Just
giving
you
an
outline
overhead
view.
As
you'll
see
the
parcel
here
outlined
in
red.
B
The
properties
to
the
north
are
residential
single
family,
detached
with
pd
zoning
up
here
the
property
to
the
east
is
residential,
single
family
detached
which
is
rs
50
zoning.
The
property
of
the
south
is
a
senior
housing
facility
which
is
pd
and
the
property
to
the
west
is
a
vacant
parcel
land
which
is
pd
zoning
at
this
time.
B
The
principal
building
as
I'll
show
you
on
the
site
plan.
B
B
C
K
C
O
Nathan,
hagan
I'll
keep
this
short.
I
don't
know
why
this
is
a
pd
and
I
don't
know
we
should
fix
that.
So
these
small
things
don't
do
that.
A
Honestly,
I
I
think
it's
it
was
recommended
to
me.
My
architect
told
me
that
that
would
be
the
better.
C
You're
good
all
right
motion
clothes
from
councilman,
good,
second
constant
seat,
all
in
favor,
aye
aye,
any
of
us
councilman
vieira.
Would
you
mind
taking
item
number
eight.
A
Yes,
sir,
I
move
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
1304
east
23rd
avenue
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
pd
plan
development,
the
pd
plan,
development,
residential
single
family
patch,
providing
an
effective
date.
There
you
go.
A
And
then
supporting
I,
I
don't
have
the
supporting
document
with
me.
I
find
that
the
findings
of
the
planning
commission
or
are
proper
to
adopt
them
here.
C
F
2203,
it's
consistent
with
housing,
land
use
policy.
It
would
encourage
new
housing
on
vacant
and
underutilized
land
to
ensure
that
an
adequate
supply
of
housing
is
available
to
meet
the
needs
of
tampa's
president
and
future
population.
The
density
proposed
by
the
development
does
not
exceed
the
density
anticipated
under
the
future
land
use
category
and
will
not
be
or
not
alter
the
character
and
development
pattern
in
the
portion
of
the
neighborhood
land
use
policy.
F
Nine
points
two
point:
one
and
nine
point
three
point:
eight,
the
proposed
development
shown
on
the
site
promotes
and
encourages
development
that
is
appropriate
and
location
character.
Compatibility
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood
proposed
use
promotes
the
efficient
and
sustainable
use
of
land
and
infrastructure
and,
by
the
way,
that's
the
neighborhood
I
was
raised
in
and.
F
I
was
looking
now
that
you
brought
up
cascading.
I
have
one
problem
with
the
city
when
you
took
the
map
off,
because
caden
the
softball
field
is
in
the
wrong
location.
C
From
councilman
vieira,
with
a
second
from
councilmember
miranda,
roll
call.
E
C
B
J
This
is
danny
collins
with
your
planning,
commission
staff.
I've
been
sworn
in
our
next
case
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically
in
the
ridgewood
park.
Neighborhood
fells
park
is
the
closest
public
recreations
facility
being
located
approximately
500
feet
northeast
of
the
subject
site
closest
transit.
Stop
is
located
approximately
500
feet
northeast
of
the
site.
At
the
intersection
of
north
glenwood
drive
in
west
palm
beach
drive
the
stock
by
service
of
the
west
shore
plaza
transfer
center.
The
site
is
within
evacuation
zone
b.
J
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
in
the
surrounding
properties,
you'll
see
the
subject.
Sites
outlined
that
is
purple
color,
it's
generally
south
of
west
amelia,
avenue
and
east
of
north
ridgewood
avenue
on
the
surrounding
areas.
Predominantly
a
single
family
detaching
character,
one
block
north
of
the
subject
site
is
west
columbus
drive.
J
Subject.
Site
is
currently
recognized
under
the
residential
10
future
land
use
designation
you'll
see
that
residential
10
designation
surrounds
the
subject
site
on
all
sides.
Finding
commission
staff
reviewed
the
application
upon
no
adverse
impacts
of
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
The
request
would
allow
for
development
that
is
similar
form
heightened
scale
of
the
surrounding
residential
units
found
in
the
ridgewood
park.
Neighborhood
this
portion
of
west
amelia
avenue
between
west
of
north
glenwood,
drive
and
east
of
north
bridgewood
avenue
presently
underdeveloped.
J
This
segment
has
an
existing
density
of
six
point:
five,
nine
units
per
acre
and
that's
based
on
nine
or
nineteen
sites
along
this
segment.
The
request
would
allow
for
additional
info
development
in
an
area
that
is
planned
up
to
ten
dwell
in
the
proposed
rezoning
supports
many
of
the
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plan
as
it
relates
to
housing
the
city's
population.
The
tampa
comprehensive
plan
encourages
new
housing
on
vacant
and
underutilized
land
to
ensure
that
an
adequate
supply
of
housing
is
available
to
meet
the
needs
of
tampa's
present
and
future
populations.
J
B
Thank
you
so
much
zane
hussain
development
coordination
case
raz
22-16,
the
applicant
is
john
larocca
location,
814
west
amelia
avenue
proposed
rezoning
from
rs60
to
rs50
this
being
euclidean.
No,
there
are
no
waivers
and
no
site
plan
I'll
now
go
ahead
and
share
a
little
bit
of
the
plat
here.
You
see
that
the
parcel
is
on
what
nine
and
ten
here
on
amelia.
B
B
B
A
A
Tampa
this
is
a
classic
case
of
infill
development.
The
two
reports
filed
with
city
council
for
consideration
this
evening
by
the
planning
commission
staff
and
the
development
coordination
staff
clearly
depict
consistency
with
all
aspects
of
the
city's
land,
development
code
and
long-range
comprehensive
plan
to
add
a
little
bit
of
flavor
to
what
mr
hussein
mentioned
this
evening,
this
particular
property,
the
two
platted
lots
of
record,
were
planted
as
part
of
the
ridgewood
park
subdivision
in
1922..
A
A
A
Exceeding
or
underneath
the
59.99
feet
in
width,
we.
A
F
Thank
you,
mr
chairman
file.
Number
10,
rec
22-16
ordnance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
honors
re-zoning
property
and
general
vicinity
of
814
west
amelia
avenue
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida,
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
rs,
60,
residential
single
family
to
rs,
50,
residential
single
family,
providing
an
effective
basis.
A
E
J
Danny
collins,
again
with
your
planning
commission's
staff
and
then
sworn
in
our
next
case,
is
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district.
More
specifically
in
the
south
power
neighborhood
hyde
park
is
the
closest
public
recreation
facility
being
located.
Approximately
a
quarter
mile
to
the
south
of
the
site
site
is
within
proximity
of
two
transit
stops
that
service
the
tampa
international
airport,
international,
plaza
marion
transfer
center
and
britain
plaza
transfer
center
subject.
Site
is
located
within
a
level
c
evacuation
zone.
J
Here
is
a
aerial
map
of
the
subject:
excitement
surrounding
properties
you'll
see
the
subject
sites
online
in
this
purple
color
it's
generally
south
of
west
zeel
streets
and
just
to
the
west
side
of
south
albany
avenue
surrounding
areas
predominantly
residential
and
character.
J
There
are
some
non-residential
uses
two
blocks
west
of
the
subject
site
on
south
howard
avenue.
J
Here's
the
adopted
future
land
use
map
subject
site
is
currently
recognized
under
the
residential
35
future
land
use
designation
that
residential
35
surrounds
the
subject
site
on
all
sides.
Two
blocks
west
of
the
subject
site
along
howard
avenue
and
then
one
block
north
of
the
subject
site
on
west
platte
street
are
parcels
that
are
recognized
under
the
community.
Mixed
use,
35
future
lineups
dozen.
J
Subject:
site
is
within
the
residential
35
designation,
if
approved
the
subject
site
would
be
developed
at
a
density
of
13.79
units
per
acre,
which
is
consistent
with
the
density
anticipated
under
the
residential
35
designation.
The
comprehensive
plan
speaks
to
the
design
of
attached
single
family
units
dancer
and
support.
Four
single
family
attached
units
are
oriented
internally
and
no
pedestrian
connections
are
provided
from
the
unit
entrances
to
the
sidewalk
on
south
albany
avenue.
J
J
This
design
is
also
inconsistent
with
land
use
policy
9.2.2,
which
requires
buildings
in
urban
neighborhoods
to
maintain
a
consistent
overall
setback
from
the
public
right
of
way.
In
order
to
create
a
pleasing
definition,
that's
published,
sidewalk
and
street
proposed
development
should
front
sidewalk
without
drive,
aisles
or
other
instructions
obstructions.
J
Overall,
the
proposed
pd
is
inconsistent
with
the
policy
direction
of
the
conference
plan.
The
pd
does
not
engage
the
public
realm
or
provide
us
safe,
pedestrian
connection
from
the
four
single
family
attached
units
to
the
sidewalk
along
south
melbourne
avenue.
The
pd
does
not
meet
the
direction
of
the
comprehensive
plan
or
ensure
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
J
B
Thank
you
so
much
zan
hussein
development
coordination
case
raz
22-19.
The
applicant
is
alex
shailer
and
tyler.
Hudson
for
the
location,
407
and
409
south
albany
avenue
proposed
rezoning
from
rm16
residential
multifamily
16,
two
pd
planned
development,
residential
single-family
detached
and
semi-detached
I'll
go
ahead
and
show
you
the
two
waivers
being
requested:
one
waiver
for
the
parking
they're
requesting
two
parking
spaces
reduced
to
14
reduction
and
also,
as
danny
alluded
to,
to
allow
the
ground
floor,
entrances
front
doors
to
four
dwelling
units
to
face
internally.
B
B
Property
surrounding
subject
site
are
developed
with
residential
single-family
and
residential
multi-family
uses
properties
to
the
north
and
the
west
are
zoned,
rm16
and
developed
with
residential
single
family
properties
to
the
east,
are
zone
rm16
and
develop
with
townhomes
and
then
probably
to
the
south.
Our
zone
pd
and
developed
with
a
duplex.
B
B
B
G
C
It's
we
see
it
on
our
screen.
C
See
raz2219.
G
Here
sorry,
yes,.
G
Good
evening
again,
as
danny
and
zane
alluded
to
this
is
in
the
specifically
in
the
carrier,
city,
oscarana,
neighborhood.
It's
it's
on
albany
avenue
in
an
area
of
hyde
park
that
is
seeing
a
lot
of
densification
as
I'll
show
in
a
little
bit.
It's
point
three
acres
site.
It's
two
current
with
two
plotted
lots:
single-family
homes
currently
on
them.
G
This
is
not
located
in
the
hyde
park:
local
historic
district,
there's,
no
architectural
review
commission
jurisdiction.
Here,
the
historic
hyde
park,
design
standards
aren't
applicable
to
this
particular
property.
Given
its
location,
I
note
here
the
walk
score.
G
I
thought
that
was
interesting
that
this
particular
neighborhood
is
actually
the
second
most
walkable
in
the
city
according
to
to
walkscore.com
you're,
just
two
blocks
east
of
the
south
howard
bar
district,
I'm
going
to
let
alex
walk
through
a
little
bit
of
the
specifics
of
this
project,
but
I
do
want
to
note
about
the
zoning-
and
this
is
something
that's
come
up
in
prior
hearings.
You
look
at
this
map.
You
see
a
whole
lot
of
pds
and
the
reason
for
that
is
because,
as
this
council
well
knows,
zoning
is
what
implements
the
comprehensive
plan.
G
That's
that's
required
under
state
law.
Every
jurisdiction
has
the
comprehensive
plan
which
gets
implemented
by
zoning.
The
comprehensive
plan
here
is
is
r35
which
talks
about
medium
density
uses
up
to
30
units,
an
acre
talks
about
even
heights
up
to
eight
stories
that
is
inconsistently
implemented
with
this
rm16
zoning.
Here
it's
it's.
G
It's
really
not
possible
to
unlock
that
density,
that
this
your
predecessors
on
council
adopted
with
this
comprehensive
plan
through
the
euclidean
rm16
zoning,
and
that
is
why
you
see
an
absolute
ocean
of
planned
development
rezonings
in
this
vicinity,
because
those
have
been
presented
to
accommodate
the
type
of
what
we
believe
is
an
appropriate
density
single
family,
detached
that
this
project
is
here
to
address.
With
that,
I'm
going
to
turn
things
over
to
alex
he's
going
to
walk
through
some
of
the
site,
details
and
waivers.
S
Good
evening,
council
alex
shaler
400
north
ashley
drive
for
the
record
and
I
have
been
sworn
to
start
off
like
tyler,
said
we're
going
to
run
through
the
development
proposal.
So
this
is
for
six
townhomes
and
we
have
externally
facing
patios,
as
shown
on
the
site
plan
and
the
sidewalk
along
south
albany
ave
is
staying
main
access
off
of
albany
as
well.
There's
a
through
connection
to
the
alley.
Also.
S
S
There
are
two
waivers
being
requested
in
conjunction
with
this
application,
the
first
one
relating
to
parking,
the
second
one
relating
to
different
entrance
orientations.
We
have
internal
to
the
project
and
we
have
extensive
waiver
justifications
for
both
of
these
that
were
included
with
the
application,
so
those
are
in
the
file
as
well
and
to
start
off
with
parking
so
we're
reducing
the
number
of
required
parking
from
14
spaces
to
12
spaces.
S
S
This
specific
pocket
of
the
city
is
very
walkable
and
we
feel
as
if
many
of
the
destinations
around
here
can
be
reached
either
by
foot
or
by
bike,
further
justifying
a
reduction
of
a
needed
asphalt
for
additional
parking
spaces,
and
we
mentioned
entrance
orientation
is
our
second
waiver
to
allow
the
ground
floor,
entrances
for
four
dwelling
units
internal
to
the
site,
two-face
internal.
S
As
you
can
see,
this
is
graphically
trying
to
show
you
guys
that
south
albany
ave,
our
frontage,
is
only
90
feet
wide
and
each
one
of
these
units
is
32
feet
in
width.
So
when
rotated
in
place
along
albany,
we
cannot
fit
all
six
along
albany
and
we
have
fit
the
maximum
of
two
that
we
can
facing
albany
ave.
S
This
is
a
screenshot
from
the
elevation
showing
those
two
doors
of
units
three
and
unit
six
that
are
facing
albany
ave,
and
then
this
is
from
the
comprehensive
plans.
Land
use,
designation
for
the
site,
building
facades
in
entrances
that
directly
address
the
street
and
have
a
high
degree
of
transparency
on
street
fronting
facades,
which
we
feel
we've
accomplished
with
units
three
and
six
providing
you
know
as
many
windows
as
we
can
those
front
doors
facing
albany
as
well.
S
We
wanted
to
speak
a
little
bit
about
pedestrian
connections,
because
this
was
a
major
component
in
the
planning
commission's
review
of
this
application.
The
section
we
have
highlighted
the
entrances
to
four
single
family
attached
units,
oriented
internal
and
no
pedestrian
connection
is
provided.
S
We
have
gone
through
recent
coordination
with
the
planning
commission
to
try
to
address
this
understanding
that
it
was
their
main
concern
with
this
application.
This
came
up
in
the
staff
report
which
we
have
received
in
this.
This
snip
of
the
site
plan
here
showing
those
additional
sidewalks
has
not
been
submitted.
It
was
too
late,
but
we
do
plan
to
make
these
adjustments
between
this
reading.
S
Another
issue
I
think
that
has
been
brought
up
in
the
limited
opposition
that's
been
filed
with
this
case
is
regarding
the
setbacks
along
albany
ave,
and
we
wanted
to
address
that
up
front.
As
you
can
see,
parcels
four
and
five
shown
here
in
this
image
are
the
subject
parcels
included
with
this
application.
Current
building
setbacks
are
14
feet
and
12
feet.
S
Our
application
is
proposing
10,
so
we
do
feel
like
it
is
congruent
with
what
is
there
existing,
as
you
can
see,
there's
a
table
showing
the
setbacks
that
we've
averages
estimated
from
the
property
appraiser
showing
relevant
relevantly
close
to
what
we
are
proposing,
and
we
did
want
to
note
that
there
is
not
currently
from
our
estimations,
a
single
lot
on
this
block
that
is
meeting
a
25-foot
setback
currently
and
south
albany
ave
does
have
right-of-way
to
the
east
into
the
west.
S
So
that's
that's
a
that's
additional
room
against
the
actual
physical
road,
since
this
is
measured
directly
from
the
property
line.
S
Just
as
further
information
regarding
the
density,
I
mean,
I
think
that
danny
did
cover
this
earlier,
but
currently
the
average
in
that
area
that
specific
block
is
16.28
units
per
acre.
Our
application
would
come
in
at
20
units
per
acre,
which
is
still
allowable
per
the
r35
future
land
use
designation
for
the
property
zooming
out
a
little
bit
from
that
specific
block
of
albany
into
the
larger,
greater
neighborhood
and
surrounding
vicinity.
We
found
a
couple
different
precedents
that
we
hoped
would
paint
a
good
picture
of
what
this
development
will
look
like
we
found
these.
S
Like,
I
said
similar
area.
This
one
is
just
west
of
the
publix
in
hyde
park,
showing
those
units
facing
internal
with
that
main
access
drive
aisle
between
them.
Our
subject
site
is
start
in
red
that
one's
in
blue,
so
so
relatively
close.
S
The
next
one
moving
north,
I'm
about
four
blocks
north
on
top
of
kennedy.
There
1912
west
north
a
street
very
similar
design
here,
where
all
the
units
are
internal
facing,
with
the
exception
of
those
that
are
located
along
the
properties
frontage
along
west
north,
a
with
those
having
access
directly
to
west
merced
street
via
the
driveway.
L
I
have
a
question:
you
said
that
the
front
door
is
facing
albany,
but
it
doesn't
look
like
that
in
the
sight
plans.
Can
you
explain
that
a
bit
better
sure.
A
Hey
alex
rios
I've
been
sworn
in
the
the
front
door,
so
there's
there's.
N
N
And
the
in
the
image
that
is
the
that
is
the
that
is.
A
The
entrance
that
faces
albany.
F
A
Yeah
so
where
albany's.
F
Now
point
out
the
entrances
to
the
to
the
to
the
building
so.
F
So
what
you're
saying
is
that
the
you
you
can
leave
through
the
patio
and
get
to
albany,
but
you
can't
walk
out
your
front
door
to
get
to
albany.
Excuse
me,
I
I
I
let
me
rephrase
that
you
can
walk
directly
out
of
your
patio
to
albany,
but
your
front
main
entrance
isn't
directly
on
all.
I
G
L
So
what
you're
saying
is
you
could
actually
you
would?
You
would
be
willing
to
rotate
that
now?
But
but
then
my
question
becomes
what
happens
to
that
those
garages,
because
then,
then
it
seems
like
you
have
three
driveways.
T
A
L
F
Yes,
sir,
mr
chair,
thank
you.
I
I'm
not
want
to
to
redesign
from
the
dais
that
I
I
don't
like
doing
that.
I
I've.
I
have
concerns
about
the
whole
situation
and
I
would
feel
it
if
you
want
to
redesign
it
yourself,
because
this
is
the
site
plan
you're
showing
us.
I
I
would
suggest
asking
for
a
continuance.
We
design
it
and
come
back.
I'm
that's
just
how
I
feel
mr
chair.
Yes,
ma'am,.
B
Say,
hussain
development
coordination,
if
you
rotate
the
building
change
the
whole
design,
you
can't
make
those
changes
between
first
second
reading.
That's
a
substantial
change
that
more
than
two
departments
in
my
internal
staff
will
have
to
review
so
they're
they're,
going
to
request
a
continuance
of
anything.
G
Tyler
hudson
400
faster
drive.
I
think
some
of
these
changes
can
be
accommodated
between
first
reading,
but
out
of
respect
to
my
fellow
travelers
on
the
agenda
and
to
not
air
this
out
here,
it
sounds
like
a
continuance
would
would
be
in
everyone's
best
interests.
So
I
don't
know
if
we
have
dates,
we
need
to
figure
out
councilman.
I
G
G
I
think
one
thing
I
would.
I
would
like
to
note,
though,
the
the
addition
of
the
perimeter
sidewalk,
which
will
create
the
connectivity
between
the
four
rear
units
and
albany
we've
spoken
to
saying
I
don't
think,
there's
any
concern
about
that
being
added
between
first
and
second
reading,
but
I'll
I'll
be
back
in
rebuttal.
All.
L
Right,
yes,
I
just
want
to
speak
to
councilman
carlson's
point
and
I
agree,
but
I
also
believe
that
if
you
look
at
the
frontages
of
the
rest
of
the
street,
every
the
streets
I
mean
the
homes
do
face
the
front
and
if
it's
just
being
able
to
turn
it,
I
think
that
would
benefit
the
street
as
a
whole.
C
G
What
I
would
ask
for
that
I
know
we
need
to
get
to
the
public
comment.
That's
that's
important
if
we
get
a
first
reading,
if
we
get
through
this
first
reading
and
we
say
we're
going
to
make
the
changes
we
want
to
make
and
we're
not
able
to
accommodate
between
between
first
and
second
reading,
we
would
we
would
have
to
go
back
to
drc
back
to
first
reading.
G
We
would
have
to
go
back
through
the
process
and
I
think
we're
confident
enough
that
the
number
of
departments
that
would
have
to
review
this,
given
the
way
we
can
tailor
it
would
be
two
or
less
that's
the
rule.
It's
not
it's
not
sort
of
art.
It
is
science
if
two
or
more
agencies
have
to
review
it,
but
we'd
like
to
try
to
accommodate
that
change
without
additional
review.
So
it
might
be
a
good
time
to
start
with
public
comment
and
I'll
be
back
in
rebuttal.
Yes,
sir,.
C
Q
Q
Those
houses
are
close
together,
they're
wanting
to
triple
the
number
of
households
on
those
lots,
as
well
as
tearing
down
those
structures.
They're
seeking
to
decrease
the
number
of
automobile
or
parking
for
the
street.
This
street
already
has
many
is
congested
with
parked
cars
from
the
residential
density.
Q
It
already
has
they're
looking
for
reductions
in
the
setbacks,
and
the
claim
has
been
made
that
somehow
the
other
houses
aren't
meeting
25,
but
I
can
tell
you,
as
I
can
sit
on
my
porch
and
I
can
measure
it,
and
I
have
that
we
won't
be
able
to
see
anything
to
the
south
once
this
10
foot
setback
is
put
in
we'll
also
be
facing
a
wall
that
is
more
than
30
feet,
tall
and
nine
more
than
90
feet
long
somewhere
between
2
700
and
3
000
square
feet
of
wall
seven
feet
from
my
from
the
property
line.
Q
It
will
of
course
obstruct
our
view
and
it's
cataclysmic
for
quality
of
life
on
the
street.
The
impervious
area
on
the
on
the
air
on
the
block
is
going
to
be
advanced
by
300
percent
albany
avenue
floods
in
during
this
during
the
the
rainy
season.
We
kind
of
call
it
with
some
affection,
the
gondola
road,
you
know-
and
this
is
only
going
to
make
it
worse,
and
I
know
it's
going
to
impact
my
property
and
property
on
the
south
directly
and
crucially,
this
development
does
not
engage
the
street
or
the
larger
neighborhood.
Q
Q
It
essentially
covers
as
much
ground
area
and
commensurate
square
footage
upward
as
possible.
It's
brutalist
self
storage,
that's
the
style
and
it's
giant
boxes
from
which
money
gets
scooped.
Only
a
developer,
who's
never
lived
on
the
street
and
never
will
could
find
it
beautiful
or
love
it.
I
I
beg
you
to
to
deny
this
request.
Q
Their
their
rationale
seems
to
be.
We
could
make
it
even
worse,
but
this
we're
going
to
be
great
and
just
make
it
this
much
worse.
Thank
you
very.
Q
I
understand
that
it's
in
the
that
it's
in
the
historic
district-
and
I
have
I
I
submitted
a
letter
with
with
a
map
of
that
this
historian
district.
I
I
I
The
the
question
we
have
to
answer
is
whether
this
is
this
proposal
is
consistent
with
the
neighborhood
and
so
from
your
perspective,
could
you
just
tell
us
in
that
area
around
the
property?
What,
for
example,
what
properties
do
you
seem
to
see
as
historic
versus
newer
design
in
adjacent
properties?
Well,.
Q
There's
one
across
the
street
and
then
of
course,
there
are
all
the
properties
that
are
on
the
next
block.
Most
almost
all
of
the
next
block.
C
I
B
Staff
found
this
consistent
due
to
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
If
you
look
at
the
surrounding
neighborhood,
you
do
have
residential
detached
and
resources.
Sorry,
residential
semi-detached.
You
have
town
homes,
you
have
single-family
homes,
so
it
was
found
consistent
also
due
to
the
amount
of
pds
in
the
area.
It
was
also
found
consistent
for
that
reason.
E
I'm
lisa
birnbaum
good
evening,
council
members
and
mr
chairman,
I've
been
sworn
in
my
husband,
don
moral
and
I
have
lived
in
this
charming
stretch
of
100
year
old
bungalows
for
30
years,
and
we
have
seen
lots
of
changes.
The
last
few
years
have
brought
us
to
the
decision
to
stay
on,
and
we've
made
improvements
indoors
and
out
this
year,
most
recently
a
new
roof,
an
exterior
paint
job.
We
love
our
home
and
can't
think
of
anywhere
else.
We've
got
we'd
rather
live.
E
E
Even
two
and
four
unit
places
across
the
street
will
be
dwarfed
by
these
hulking
blocks
of
housing
and
residents
will
suffer
from
parking
woes
for
us.
It
will
be
the
worst
because
we're
right
next
door,
but
there
are
a
dozen
issues
you'll
see
in
the
record
and
all
the
letters
that
have
come
in
to
you
that
show
this
to
to
have
consequences
for
the
street
and
the
neighborhood,
despite
the
townhouses
scattered
across
many
of
the
blocks
in
the
neighborhood.
The
area
still
has
a
historical
feel
that
many
here
clear,
clearly
value.
E
Several
neighbors
have
told
us
that,
even
though
they
bought
newer
places,
they
bought
also
for
the
for
the
view
of
the
four
bungalows
as
one
who
had
his
favorites
called
them.
The
three
sisters,
these
1920s
arts
and
crafts
homes
firmly
established
the
character
of
oscar
wanna
on
every
block,
beautiful
reminders
of
our
city's
past.
Nearly
every
one
of
them
has,
in
the
last
few
years,
been
spruced
up
and
now
couples
can
be
seen
on
our
street
with
dogs
and
baby
carriages,
or
even
people
exercising
in
the
evening
and
sometimes
stopping
to
chat
with
us.
E
It's
heartbreaking
to
realize
that,
just
as
my
husband
retires
and
we
have
more
time
at
home,
we
could
have
our
first
years
pummeled
by
extensive
construction
across
two
lots
right
beside
us
and
so
many
unknowns
and
disruptions
to
accommodate.
Instead
of
the
peace
we've
earned,
are
people
like
us
to
be
driven
out
of
tampa
so
that
the
developers
developers
can
get
richer?
H
I
was
a
county
planner
for
12
years
in
another
state,
but
I
did
this
work
where
and
I
had
to
make
tough
decisions
about
properties
that
that
were,
and
just
the
fact
that
they're
basically
going
to
put
a
bulldozer
to
two
of
the
beautiful
hyde
park
cottages
to
start
this
project,
they're
going
to
tear
down
one,
you
should
drive
out
there.
They
are
two
of
the
nicest
in
good
shape,
hyde
park.
H
Cottages
on
albany
avenue,
that's
going
to
be
the
first
step,
and
so
I
would
urge
you
to
to-
and
I
know
you
will
consider
all
of
the
ramifications
of
this-
we
have
got
a
a
lot
of
construction
going
on
on
our
street
on
our
street,
but
I
appreciate
your
time.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
Sir,
can
I
ask
you
a
question,
can
I
ask
you
a
question:
do
you
know
is
this?
Is
this
property
in
the
in
the
hyde
park
area
there's
the
local
historic
district
which
is
protected
and
then
there's
the
national
historic
district
which
is
identified
but
not
protected?
Do
you
have
any
idea
if
this
is
in
the
nationals.
H
I
H
I
Story,
do
you
know
that
answer
that
is
in
the
local
and
the
national?
Yes
zane
you
want
to,
and
then
but
it's
not,
but
these
are
not
contributing
structures
that
are
protected.
B
Historic
district,
not
not
local.
I
You
all
may
know
this
because
I
yeah
it's,
the
the
local
historic
district
is
protected,
but
the
national
historic
is
identified
as
historic
in
their
historic
homes,
but
they're
not
protected,
and
do
you
know
if
it's
a
contributing
structure?
Are
these
contributing
structures
saying
or
not.
I
B
No
I'll
have
to
check
with
our
historic
preservation
team.
Without
is
that
an
easy
answer,
or
I
can
find
out
very
soon.
G
Ken
shirette
I
live
in
this
neighborhood.
I
bet
good
evening,
mr
chairman
and
council
members.
I
am
in
opposition
to
this
proposal
rezoning
a
407,
499
south
albany
avenue
for
the
next
three
minutes.
G
G
G
G
G
G
They
they
have
just
recently
they're
renovating
they've,
just
turned
them
into
a
cork
that
corporation
that's
in
hyde
park.
Also
that
owns
all
these
apartments
and
they're,
renovating
them
so
they're
at
50
capacity.
Now,
because
they're
renovating
all
the
interior
of
the
buildings,
which
is
a
great
asset
to
the
neighborhood.
O
My
name
is
nathan
hagan
there.
As
you
know,
there
are
thousands
of
people
being
displaced
in
the
city
of
tampa
today
or
facing
housing
and
securi
insecurity,
because
we
do
not
have
enough
housing.
O
People
are
the
people
who
will
live
here
are
moving
here,
regardless
of
whether
whether
this
gets
built
without
these
four
homes,
four
families
with
less
means
will
be
displaced
because
the
family
that
wants
to
live
here
will
live
somewhere
else,
and
if
you
go
down
the
line,
there
will
be
four
less
four
fewer
homes
in
our
community
for
four
of
the
poorest
people
in
our
community,
let's
say
at
least
eight
families
will
benefit
by
this.
O
These
extra
four
units
being
put
in
none
of
them
are
being
represented
here
tonight.
Talking
about
parking
again.
Street
parking
is
a
normal
thing
in
urban
environment.
This
is
the
most
walkable
community
in
tampa,
besides
water
street
or
channel
side-
and
you
know
you
talk
about
the
nine
units
that
were
allowed
under
the
land
use.
This
is
only
what
six
the
urban
form
is,
maybe
a
little
questionable.
O
But
if
you
have
an
issue,
the
issue
is
with
our
land
development
code.
Not
with
this
project
because
with
our
parking
menus,
ostensibly
the
reason
it
was
laid
out.
This
way
is
because
they
had
to
fit
a
lot
of
parking
in
there
and
there
were
there's
I'm
not
speaking
to
the
developer,
but
I
assume
that
they
would
never
make
a
proposal
to
eliminate
parking
in
a
pd.
I
know
how
it
would
go
right
now,
so
I
also
want
to
highlight
you
know
this
is
very
close
to
the
grocery
store.
O
It's
right
on
howard
avenue.
It's
got
access
to
great
transit,
the
bayshore
boulevard
and
the
dedicated
bike
lanes
are
right.
Nearby,
there's
tons
of
other
ones
like
this.
Eight
families
benefit
by
this
home
being
built.
If
you
want
to
argue
over
the
door
placement
or
this
or
that
I
I
understand,
I'm
proving
urban
form
but
saying
that
that
four
families
can't
move
in
here,
I
think,
is
detrimental
to
our
community.
So
I
would
support
this
project.
C
C
G
Gave
me
council
tyler
hudson
the
the
neighbors
that
you
heard
from
this
evening,
love
their
neighborhood
and
for
good
reason,
because
it's
a
great
neighborhood,
it's
a
neighborhood
that
more
people
would
would
like
to
call
home
and
that's
exactly
what
your
comprehensive
plan
anticipates
for
this
piece
of
land
up
to
nine
homes,
a
set
of
increase
of
seven
we're
asking
for
for
six.
G
We
think
that
this
configuration
we
think
this
density
is
reasonable.
I
think
these
waivers
are
amply
supported
by
the
justifications
that
we
have
put
into
the
record.
G
You
have
a
consistency
finding
from
your
staff,
which
I
can
tell
you,
is
not
not
always
an
easy
thing
to
get
and
as
to
the
planning
commission's
inconsistency
finding
it
was
based
on
two
circumstances.
The
first
was
a
lack
of
pedestrian
connections
for
the
rear
units
to
the
sidewalk
on
albany.
We
can
affect
that
change
between
first
and
second
reading
without
issue
the
second
issue
of
the
frontages.
G
I
want
to
touch
on
two
brief
issues
that
were
raised
in
opposition
regarding
the
the
historic
nature
this
is
in
the
this
is
in
the
national
historic
district.
It
is
not
in
the
local
historic
district.
The
certificate
appropriate
process
does
not
apply
here.
Arc
has
no
jurisdiction
here
and
on
the
infrastructure.
G
I
would
assume
that
that
is
something
that's
really
outside
the
scope
of
this
rezoning.
There
are
a
there's,
a
truckload
of
state
laws
that
regard
currency
impact
fees.
Things
like
that,
and
I
will
we
absolutely
do-
have
some
infrastructure
needs
throughout
this
community,
but
that's
that's
not
really
what's
the
subject
of
this
hearing
before
this
evening,
so
I
appreciate
your
time
appreciate
your
patience
and
we
would
respectfully
ask
that
you
approve
this
tonight.
Thank
you.
L
Councilwoman
heart
attack-
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
appropriate
place,
I'm
a
little
new
here.
So
let
me
know
if
I'm
going
too
far.
I
think
another
issue
that
the
residents
raised
is
the
the
design
a
little
inconsistent
with
even
the
new
townhomes
that
we
saw
pictures
of.
D
I
believe
that
would
not
be
your
purview
to
be
able
to
to
ask
it
to
be
redesigned
and
to
go
into
design
elements.
What
you
have
is
you
have
the
site
plan,
it's
the
site
plan,
the
controls
and
that's
what
I
ask
that
you
focus
on
the
criteria
of
the
code
and
apply
the
fact,
as
you
have
them
to
the
code
as
it's
presented
to
you
and
make
certain
findings
and
then
see
if
it's
applicable
and
consistent.
A
G
A
A
Sure
the
question
was:
is
it
regards
to
the
yes.
N
D
Then,
if
for
rebuttal,
if
mr
hudson
wishes
to
say
anything
counsel,
I
would
just
ask
mr
chairman,
if
you
could
just
ask
if
questions
be
made
before
the
applicant,
has
the
last
word
so,
okay
after
his
presentation,
anything
you
can.
G
Nothing
really
more.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
if
there
is
a
emotion
brought
forward
that
we
make
sure
that
the
the
revision
sheet
includes
the
addition
of
the
perimeter,
pedestrian
connections
and
also
the
orientation
of
the
albany
fronting
buildings
to
to
have
the
frontage
requirements
mentioned
in
the
planning
commission
staff
report,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
it
doesn't
get
lost
and
official
okay,
anything.
K
F
A
I
can,
I
can
read
it
and
I'll
sure
I
I
can
read
it.
Mr
chairman,
I'm
moving.
A
Yeah
and
I'm
sorry,
I
wrote
this
down,
I
I
didn't
get
all
the
requested
editions,
including
the
orientation
of
the
albany
frontage
conditions,
and
I
and
mr
hudson
had
mentioned
something
else,
but
I
couldn't
write
it
down
in
time
to
the
the
the
additional
statements
by
mr
hudson
that
were
mentioned.
I
don't
want
to
have
to
reopen
if
anybody
remembers
that
I
couldn't
write
it
down
in
time.
C
B
C
F
I
feel
the
petitioner
does
not
beat
the
bill
burden
of
proof
and
that
is
failure
to
comply
with
the
applicable
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
The
proposed
rezoning
is
inconsistent
with
the
land
use
policy
9.2.6,
which
is
encouraging
the
design
and
development
of
single-family
attached
projects
to
include
the
orientation
of
the
front
door
of
two
sidewalks
and
the
failure
of
the
line
development
code,
section
27-136.
F
If
you
would
like
me
to,
I,
will
the
neater
desires
of
waivers
unnecessarily
supports
the
fact
that
the
proposed
development
is
not
appropriate
for
the
site
and
does
not
it
is
not?
Com
does
not
comply.
Excuse
me,
with
the
land
development
code.
F
A
C
A
A
A
E
C
F
J
Sorry
about
that,
danny
collins
with
your
planning,
commission
staff,
have
been
sworn
in.
Our
next
case
is
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically
in
the
south
howard
neighborhood
high
park
is
the
closest
public
recreation
facility,
which
is
located
approximately
four
blocks
to
the
south.
Subject:
site
host's
transit
stop
is
located
one
block
northeast
of
the
site
at
the
intersection
of
west
platte
street
and
south
melville
avenue.
Subject,
sites
located
within
a
level
c
evacuation
zone.
J
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
and
surrounding
properties
you'll
see
the
subject.
Site
is
generally
south
of
west
platte
street
and
on
the
east
side
of
west
zeel
street
there
are
predominantly
residential
uses
that
surround
the
subject
site
on
the
south
side
of
south
platte
street.
There
are
some
non-residential
uses
located
along
west
class
street.
J
South
powered
avenue
is
approximately
four
blocks
to
the
west
of
the
subject.
Site
which
contain
predominantly
non-residential
uses
here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
The
subject
site
is
currently
under
the
recognized
zone
of
the
residential
35
future
land
use
designation.
J
Site
are
parcels
designated
cme35,
that's
the
umc
mu-35
is
the
predominant
land
use
category
along
this
portion
of
west
5th
street
and
also
along
north
or
I'm
sorry,
south
howard
avenue
subject
site
is
within
the
residential
35
designation,
if
approved
the
subject
site
would
be
developed
at
a
density
of
29
12
12
youth
per
acre,
which
is
consistent
with
the
residential
35
future
land
use
designation,
while
the
proposed
use
and
density
are
consistent
with
the
underlying
future
land
use.
The
request
is
inconsistent
with
land
use
policy.
J
9.2.6
the
site
proposes
two
of
the
units
front
doors
and
garages
to
face
the
improved
alleyway
east
of
south
albany
avenue.
The
remaining
two
units
would
be
constructed
to
face
south
of
albany
avenue
awoke
street
with
the
sidewalk.
J
The
city's
comprehensive
plan
encourages
the
design
and
development
of
single-family
attached
projects
to
include
orientation
of
the
front
door
to
sidewalk
and
street
by
orienting
two
units
to
an
alley
without
providing
pedestrian
connections
to
south
albany
avenue
proposed
site
plan
does
not
meet
this
policy
direction
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
This
also
prevents
a
safety
concern
for
residents
of
those
units.
J
Planning.
Commission
staff
recognizes
the
role
that
alleyways
contributes
to
the
city's
neighborhoods.
These
alloways
provide
neighborhood
connectivity,
public
service
functions,
including
garbage
pickup
fire
rescue
services,
alleyway
serves
as
a
specific
purpose
and
is
not
intended
to
be
used
as
a
main
entrance
for
residential
units.
J
Finding
commission
staff
is
greatly
concerned
that
the
public
safety
of
the
neighborhood
will
be
hindered
by
allowing
the
rest
of
residential
units
to
face
alleyway
overall,
due
to
the
site
layout
proposed
pd
is
inconsistent
with
the
policy
direction
of
the
comprehensive
plan
based
on
these
considerations,
planning
commission
staff
finds
the
request
inconsistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
This
concludes
my
presentation.
J
L
Yes,
ma'am,
I
actually
do
have
a
question.
I
know
you
find
it
inconsistent,
but
is:
doesn't
this
area
have
a
lot
of
garage
apartments
that
actually
do
have
an
entrance
onto
the
alleyway.
J
However,
it's
when
used
for
attached
units,
for
example,
land
use
policy
9.2.6,
requires
entrances
to
orient
towards
a
public,
sidewalk
and
street
in
in
this
case
it
would
not
also,
there
is
no
access
from
there's
no
safe.
There's
no
access
for
residents
to
to
get
to
south
melanie
avenue.
They
would
have
to
walk
out
into
the
alley
which
poses
a
safety
concern.
B
Thanks
so
much
susan
hussein,
development
coordination
case,
rez
22-20,
the
representative
is
simon,
amsbury
and
russell
ottenberg
for
the
location
at
306.
South
albany
avenue
share
aerial
view,
so
the
property
here
is
proposing
a
rezone
from
rm16
residential
multifamily
16
to
pd
planned
development
residential
multi-family.
B
There
are
three
waivers
being
requested,
one
as
daniel
was
referring
to
for
those
two
eastern
units
to
face
an
alley.
Second
is
for
an
owl
with
transportation,
and
the
third
is
for
reduction
in
green
space,
natural
resources.
B
B
The
proposed
parking
is
nine
parking
spaces
and
they
meet
the
requirement
of
nine
parking
spaces,
probably
to
the
north.
B
Probably
to
the
north
of
the
parcel
is
pd
with
residential
single
family
property
to
the
south
is
zone
rm16
developed
with
residential
single
family,
to
the
west
zone,
pd
with
town
homes
and
to
the
east.
The
parcel
is
rm16
with
residential
single
family.
On
the
lot.
B
B
B
Development
review
and
comply
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
inconsistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
land
development
code.
This
is
due
to
transportation,
needing
a
waiver
planning
commission
needing
a
waiver
and
natural
resources
needing
waiver.
Also,
the
fire
department
has
found
inconsistent
and
the
applicant,
if
approved,
would
have
to
fix
their
needs
between
first
and
second
reading.
Also
on
that
part,
I
am
here
for
any
questions
if
needed,.
F
F
F
The
the
apron
for
the
parking
in
the
rear,
where
there's
four
cars
are,
is
that
extending
the
apron
is
that
extending
into
the
alleyway,
as
it's
shown
on
the
site
plan.
C
P
Hey
jonathan
scott
transportation
planning
their
driveway
apron
does.
A
Connect
into
the
alley,
that's
what
you're
asking.
F
F
P
Yes,
sir,
the
their
driveway
on
the
alley
does.
A
Tie
into
the
alley
in
the
back,
it
does
flare
into
it.
Do.
C
Well,
it
just
connects
right
into
it.
That's
part
of
the
reason
why
they
need
a
backup
waiver.
A
You
know
that's
the
the
waiver
just
the
way,
those
the
way
that
the
parking
spaces
are
that's
the
only
way
where
they
need,
but
at
least
they
can
get.
You
know
cars
parked
there.
They
have
enough
within.
T
Good
evening
russell
ottenberg
3737
lake
joyce
drive
land
of
lakes
florida.
I
have
been
sworn
before.
I
start
I'd
like
to
enter
a
couple
documents
into
the
record.
T
D
T
A
lot
of
these
developments
and
I'll
get
into
this
with
the
specific
waivers
have
units
that
access
directly
to
allies
and
that
access
to
alleys
with
less
than
24
feet
of
pavement,
which
is
also
one
of
the
waivers.
T
So
you
can
see
that,
for
example-
and
I
think
I've
checked
some
of
these
off-
this
is
a
unit
that
accesses
via
alley
these
two
units
access
via
alley.
All
of
these
units
down
here
access
alley.
These
units
access
alley,
these
units
access
alley
all
of
these
units
access
alley,
all
of
these
units
access
alley,
these
units
access
ally
and
these
units
access
ally.
T
So,
as
far
as
the
the
waiver
to
accessing
an
alley,
what
we're
requesting
is
entirely
consistent
with
the
development
trend
in
the
area
with
respect
to
having
the
the
front
doors
on
an
alley.
Those
same
units
have
their
front
doors
on
the
alley,
so
this
is
or
many
of
them
do
not
all
of
them,
but
many
of
them
do,
and
so
that
is
also
consistent
with
the.
What
we're
requesting
is
also
consistent
with
the
with
the
development
trends
in
the
area.
T
So
we
have
a
third
waiver
which
is
to
the
overall
green
space
per
unit
and
the
land
development
regulations
require
350
square
feet
per
unit
and
that
would
require
400
square
feet.
We
are
proposing
roughly
310
square
feet
per
unit
now
directly
across
the
street,
at
305
south
albany
avenue.
In
one
of
the
photos
that
zane
had
shown,
you
saw
that
same
four
townhome
development,
so
directly
across
the
street
right
here.
T
Is
a
four-town
home
development
on
a
lot
the
same
size
that
was
approved
via
pd
that
has
direct
access
to
an
alley
for
their
front
doors,
has
their
their
driveways
on
the
alley
also
had
a
reduction
in
square
footage
from
350
square
feet
per
unit
to
300
square
feet.
That
waiver
was
approved
and
they
were
also
required
to
put
in
a
fire
sprinkler
system,
which
is
one
of
the
comments
that
fire
review
had
for
us,
and
we've
actually
already
addressed
that
in
our
most
recent
site
plan
that
was
submitted
for
review.
T
T
As
I
said
a
little
earlier,
we
also
had
a
neighborhood
meeting
two
nights
ago,
that
was
the
neighbors
were
invited
to
about
a
week
prior
and
set
up
right
in
the
front
yard
of
306
right
here
we
had
a
total
of
three
people
show
up
they
all
signed
in
and,
as
you
can
see,
they
all
are
in
support
of
this
petition.
T
And
so,
in
addition
to
that,
as
as
we
have,
we
have
two
general
categories
of
things
going
on
here.
We
have
whether
or
not
the
use
itself
is
consistent
and
compatible,
and
I
think
planning,
commission
and
city
staff
has
said
that
it
is
consistent
compatible
and
then
we
have
some
technical
inconsistencies.
T
The
three
that
I
discussed,
the
access
from
the
alley,
the
the
alley
with
and
then
the
reduction
in
green
space
there's
some
other
technical
inconsistency
with
respect
to
with
respect
to
the
tree
on
the
that
straddles
the
property
line
and
fire
and
those
are
addressed
in
the
revision
sheet.
The
updated
revision
sheet
that
has
been
submitted,
we're
in
agreement
with
all
of
those
we're
going
to
make
those
changes.
T
It
is
a
use
that
is,
and
a
development
of
comparable
scale
and
scope
as
other
multi-family
developments
within
this
neighborhood.
T
Another
fact
that
is
a
little
bit
different
than
some
of
the
other.
Some
of
the
other
petitions
you've
heard
tonight.
The
current
property
owner,
who
is
the
developer,
is
going
to
live
in
one
of
these
units,
so
only
three
of
them
are
going
to
be
sold
to
other
people.
She
she
lives
there.
Now
she
wants
to
live.
She
wants
this
to
be
a
first-class
development
and
we
submitted
elevations,
but
they
really
don't
show
what
the
quality
of.
T
The
units
are-
and
this
is
a
better
representation
of
what
that's
going
to
look
like,
as
has
been
noted
in
many
of
the
previous
meetings.
There
is
a
need
for
housing
in
this
area.
T
T
F
I
I'm
just
curious,
and
I
no
way
am
I
in
any
way
saying
that
the
presentation
is
flawed.
But
when
you
hear
when
I
hear
the
word,
it's
the
same
as
another
one.
That
means
to
me
that
the
same
three
waivers
have
to
be
exact,
because
if
you
said
everything
is
the
same
as
the
other
one.
That
means
that
two
units
have
to
face
the
alley.
F
That
means
that
the
same
unit
that
you're
talking
comparing
it
to
have
to
be
reduction
of
space
from
width
of
24
feet
to
15
feet,
and
it
has
to
be
then
that
the
green
space
is
reduced
from
350
to
311,
and
I
don't
know
if
that's
factual
or
not,
in
other
words,
when
you're,
comparing
your
property
one
across
from
you.
We
don't
know.
I
don't
know
specifically
I'll,
be
honest
with
you.
If
that
reduction
of
the
alley
is
from
24
feet
to
15
feet,.
T
Sure,
and
actually
I've
included
the
approved
pd
site
plans
for
305
across
the
street
in
the
materials
that
you
have
now
they
actually
got
a
reduction
in
green
space
and
you're
right.
It's
not
exactly
the
same.
I'm
not
always
want
to
know
that
material.
T
So
the
the
the
the
one
across
the
street
actually
got
a
larger
reduction
in
green
space
than
what
we're
requesting-
and
I
I
don't
recall
I'd-
have
to
look
what
the
alley
with
is
on
on
that,
but
again
they
were
approved
for
a
reduction
from
24
feet
to
something
less
than
24
feet.
T
There
are
other
developments
of
this
nature
that
have
that
have
access
on
a
15-foot
alley.
T
F
Thank
you
again,
I'm
looking
at
front
door
facing
it
would
be
great
if
all
the
front
doors
could
face
the
street.
I
understand
the
design
is
there
and
part
of
the
design
is
parking
if
we
all
throw
very
small
cars,
sub-compact
mini
coopers
that
are
only
10
foot
that
run
on
electric
we'd
have
a
much
better
place
to
live
in.
However,
we
can't
circumvent
the
laws,
the
parking
requirements
yet,
but
I
have
the
issue
with
the
four
places
parking
spaces.
F
F
F
Let
me
let
me
finish
it
as
you
go.
If
we
were
able
to
just
say:
okay,
you
could
have
two
parking
spaces
in
back.
That
would
be
fine.
My
concern
is
size
of
the
vehicles,
the
amount
of
turning
races,
radius,
the
the
parking
space
available
in
the
rear
and
not
to
mention
the
doors
aren't
facing
the
street.
So
though,
I'm
letting
you
know
my
concerns
understood.
Thank
you.
B
Zane
hussain
development
coordination,
mr
citro,
I
understand
what
you're
saying
I
would
definitely
love
to
get
our
transportation
engineer
on
staff
jonathan
scott,
to
give
his
input
on
the
parking
situation
on
the
dimensions,
as
you
said,
which
is
a
great
example
with
a
mini
coupe
compared
to
a
mini
van.
So
jonathan
scott,
are
you
on
the
line,
sir
yeah.
P
Jonathan
scott
transition
planning,
mr
citro,
you
make
some
good
points.
I
mean
the.
P
Asking
for
the
waivers
of
the
backup
and
you're
right,
you
know
if
you
had
a
bigger
vehicle,
it'd
be
tough
to
make
that
turn,
but
at
least
they're
getting
enough
room.
We
worked.
C
A
Apple
clint,
to
get
enough
room
on
that
he's
got
like
18
feet
over
18
feet,
which
you
can
fit.
A
Which
is
better
than
than
most,
you
know,
developments
the
at
least
you
can
park
a
car
there.
That's
what
I'm
saying.
P
Now
the
applicant
has
looked
into,
I
think
they
provided
lux
model
turn.
You
know.
A
P
F
T
Okay,
I
I
you
know
and
19
feet
long.
My
nissan
titan
is
19
feet
long.
You
know
I
don't.
I
don't
know
that
there
are
vehicles
that
are
most
vehicles
are
not
that
size.
C
F
H
I
had
to
put
a
parking
lot
behind
my
house
when
I
got
my
zoning
change
to
run
my
law
office
out
of
that
bungalow.
So
I
have
a
parking
lot
but
to
propose
two
cars
of
average
size
going
into
two
living
units,
not
two,
four,
four,
that's
a
problem.
I
think
that
that
I'm
glad
this
gentleman
raised
mr
fiera
raised,
because
I
think
it's
a
real
problem
now.
H
H
Because
I
would
just
say
on
the
record
that
I
think
it
was
intentionally
let
to
fall
into
disrepair
so
that
they
could
tear
it
down
and
do
what
they're
doing,
and
I
think
that's
too
bad,
because
the
six,
the
six
houses
between
albany
and
they're,
all
single
family,
they're,
all
occupied
people.
Folks.
E
Joanne
wells
and
good
evening,
mr
chairman,
in
the
council
and
dwight's
my
husband
and
we
live
at
304
south
albany
next
door
to
the
proposed
rezoning
to
residential
multi-family
and
we've
lived.
We've
owned
the
building
for
about
30
years
and
we
love
our
bungalow.
E
We
love
living
in
a
historic
district,
even
though
it's
not
maybe
official,
my
husband
and
I
we
walk
in
our
neighborhood.
We
love
the
fact
that
we
can
walk
to
nearby
stores
and
restaurants,
and
this
is
the
reason
I
am
opposing.
The
rezoning
is
there's
not
another.
Three-Story
building
anywhere
on
our
block
is
totally
out
of
proportion
to
the
surrounding
bungalows,
the
townhouse
across
the
street.
E
The
attorney
was
referring
to
is
two-story,
not
three.
The
only
two
units
are
allowed
under
the
current
zoning.
Four
units
would
be
200
percent
increase.
In
the
current,
the
current
zoning
density,
the
proposed
reducing
the
front
yard
setback
from
25
to
18
feet
will
result
in
losing
two
parking
places
on
the
street
and
cars
parked
across
the
sidewalk,
which
is
illegal.
E
E
Also,
most
families
have
two
cars,
and
that
will
mean
double
parking,
as
it
is
very
little
street
parking
available.
Now
the
proposed
rezoning
will
cause
more
impervious
aries
on
the
property
and
severely
add
to
the
drainage
problems
we
already
have
in
the
neighborhood
with
heavy
rains
in
the
summer.
Our
streets
are
flooding,
and
this
would
only
add
to
the
problem.
E
The
proposed
development
does
not
meet
the
minimum
green
space
requirements
of
350
square
feet
per
unit,
the
city
of
tampa
rezoning
staff
report,
the
alleyway
provides
neighborhood,
contactivity
and
public
service
functions,
including
garbage
pickup
and
fire
rescue
services.
The
alleyways
are
never
intended
to
be
used
as
a
main
entrance
for
residential
units.
E
Q
And
donald
morrill,
I
live
at
405,
south
albany
and
I've
come
in
solidarity
against
this.
This
proposed
project,
but
I'm
here
specifically
to
speak
on
behalf
of
paula
stahl,
who
is
liv
who
lives
at
308,
south
albany
on
the
other
side
of
the
proposed
development
and
she's
lived
there
since
1989
as
unable
to
attend
this
meeting,
and
I'm
just
reading
a
prepared
text
from
her.
Q
Of
primary
concern
to
her
is
the
protected
live
oak
in
the
backyard
of
her
property.
Along
with
her
letter,
she
submitted
a
report
from
retired
city
arborist,
david
riley,
who
determined
the
amount
of
cutback
required
in
the
covering
of
its
root
structure,
will
cause
the
tree
to
die,
which
will
put
her
own
home
at
risk
of
damage.
Q
As
seen
in
this
photo,
which
you
received
in
riley's
report,
the
red
markings
show
how
much
would
need
to
be
removed.
Approximately
one-third
of
the
tree's
canopy
last
summer,
stahl
was
approached
by
the
applicant
about
removing
the
tree
and
was
willing
to
agree
it
financially
compensated
for
the
value
of
the
tree.
The
applicant's
response
was
that
stahel
was
threatening
her.
It
also
came
to
light
that
the
applicant
expected
stahel
to
remove
the
tree
at
her
own
expense,
again
paulus
to
hell
fully
objects
to
this
rezoning
request.
O
Nathan
hagan,
the
incredible
walkability
of
this
neighborhood
is
a
result
of
the
density
like
this.
If
you've
been
in
the
neighborhood,
you
know
there
are
a
lot
of
projects
that
look
exactly
like
this
that
have
gone
up
the
walkability.
That
neighborhood,
I
would
say,
is
a
direct
result
of
that.
O
I
don't
want
to
call
it
a
quadplex,
but
but
it
is,
and
quadplexes
and
walkable
neighborhoods
don't
require
nine
parking
spots.
Councilman
sitra
already
talked
about
that.
So
I'll
stop
there.
You
know
alleys
should
not
be
scary,
dangerous
places.
It
seems
to
me
that
council
has
the
opportunity
to
evaluate
the
credibility
of
that
and
and
evaluating
this
project.
O
In
fact,
I'll
say
that
there
this
parking
situation
at
the
alley
actually
improved
safety,
in
that
I
use
that
street
to
bike,
to
howard
or
to
the
winn-dixie
pretty
regularly,
and
I
would
love
to
have
the
cars
that
would
be
put
in
that
development
not
go
on
to
albany
and
compete
with
me
for
space
on
the
road
as
a
cyclist
and
as
a
final
point,
you
know
similar
to
other
things.
I've
said
tonight,
projects
like
this
reduce
gentrification
pressure
in
other
neighborhoods.
O
G
F
G
G
This
plan
has
no
no
garages
in
the
back,
so
all
the
cars
are
right
on
the
alley.
This
side
of
the
street
is
the
parking
side
of
the
street,
there's
four
more
bungalows
on
this
street
that
can
be
taken
down,
and
this
is
how
this
whole
neighborhood
is
developing.
All
of
a
sudden
you've
got
you've,
got
no
parking
on
that
block
and
then
you're,
allowing
to
put
what
what
we
would
like
to
see
is
put
your
three-story
buildings
at
the
end
of
the
blocks,
not
through
the
streetscape.
G
It's
you're
you're,
trying
to
redevelop
a
hundred-year-old,
neighborhood
and
you're
like
putting
you're
just
putting
things
up,
because
you
don't
know
what
you're
doing,
and
it's
obvious
you
take
income
and
look
at
this.
How
this
is
playing
out
and
it
looks
like
it-
it
isn't:
a
planned
community
and
you're
in
charge
you're.
We
voted
you
in
to
take
and
do
a
a
nice
job
take
and
walk
through
this
and
look
at
it
you're
creating
a
disaster.
G
G
You
can't
do
this,
you
can.
We
can't
redo
a
neighborhood.
You
need
to
take
and
have
some
sort
of
idea
of
what
on
what
a
development
is,
and
you
don't
know
what
a
development
is.
You're
putting
two-story
three-story
go
ahead,
put
three
stories
on
the
at
the
at
the
end
of
the
blocks
and
and
you
need
to
be
using
alleyways
for
parking,
not
streets.
B
Zane
hussain
development
coordination,
my
arborist
aaron,
unfortunately
fell
sick,
so
she
is
not
available
tonight,
but
there
is
a
30
inch
live
oak
off
the
property
which,
if
this
development
happens,
it
will
severely
affect
the
30
inch
live
oak,
which
spans
two
lots.
T
In
terms
of
parking
on
the
alley
again,
that
is
a
common
design
feature
throughout
the
neighborhood.
The
I'd
like
to
make
a
slight
clarification
for
what
mr
charep
and
I
apologize.
If
I
mispronounced
his
name
said
regarding
that
this.
These
are
the
elevations
for
that
only
two
they're
they're
single
car
garages.
So
on
the
alley
one
car
is
parked
between
the
face
of
the
garage
and
the
island.
It's
tandem
parking.
T
It
is
not
a
two-car
garage
as
with
respect
to
the
height
the
rm-16
zoning
district,
that
this
is
in
currently
allows
a
height
of
up
to
35
feet
by
right.
So
if
the
owner
wanted
to,
they
could
demolish
the
house
today
build
a
single
family
house
up
to
35
feet
high
without
any
consideration
from
anyone.
T
So
that
is
a
use
by
right.
We
are
holding
that
cap
in
our
pd
and
we'll
be
under
the
35
feet.
There
is
no
parking
on
the
right-of-way.
All
the
parking
is
on
site.
We
have
sufficient
depth
between
the
property
line
and
the
face
of
the
garages
or
the
face
of
the
building
to
accommodate
full-size
vehicles.
T
T
T
T
T
With
respect
to
the
canopy,
we
also
had
an
arborist
look
at
this.
The
arborist
report
is
part
of
the
application
package.
The
arborist
has
said
that
no
more
than
25
percent
of
the
canopy
would
be
removed
as
part
of
this
project,
and
any
removal
would
be
done
in
accordance
with
industry
standards.
So
there's
not
going
to
be
an
unqualified
crew.
It's
all
going
to
be
done
under
our
burst
direction.
T
I
would
like
to
have
simon
amesbury
he
is.
He
will
be
the
the
builder
for
this
project
if
it
gets
approved.
I
would
like
him
to
talk
about
the
condition
of
the
existing
residents,
because,
unfortunately
it
is
not
savable,
but
he
can
speak
to
that
better
than
I
can.
M
My
name
is
simon,
aimsbury
730,
south
stirling.
I
have
been
sworn
in
yeah
just
talking
about
the
existing
property.
The
current
owner
has
lived
in
it
since
purchase,
which
I.
M
O
C
L
Well,
I
kind
of
I
would
do
you
want
to
do
emotion,
first
and
then
have
conversation
or
how
does
this
work?
How.
D
L
Talk
about
ourselves!
Well,
then
I'll
just
do
I'll
just
do
a
motion
and
see
how
it
goes.
Okay,
I
moved
to
deny
rec
22-20
for
the
property
located
at
306,
south
albany
avenue,
due
to
the
failure
of
the
applicant
to
meet
its
spur
to
meet
its
version
of
proof
to
provide
competent
and
substantial
evidence
that
the
development
as
conditioned
and
shown
on
the
site
plan
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
city
code
and
the
applicant's
failure
to
meet
its
burden
of
proof.
With
respect
to
the
requested
waivers.
L
A
failure
to
comply
with
applicable
in
in
terms
of
the
comprehensive
plan
encouraging
the
design
and
development
of
single
family
attached
projects
to
include
the
orientation
of
front
doors
to
sidewalks
and
streets.
The
land
development
code
does
not
promote
the
efficient
and
sustainable
use
of
land
and
infrastructure
and
and
really
the
waivers.
The
aisle
with
waiver
of
transportation
is
a
concern.
D
Would
ask,
I
would
ask
that
you
cite
to
sections
of
the
code.
Oh.
D
Okay
and
with
regard
to
anything
else,
oh.
L
On
the
motion,
I
mean
it's
my
emotion,
but
I
I
still,
I
think
the
density
is
just
a
little
too
much
for
this
lot,
especially
because
of
the
parking
I
think,
if
we
didn't
have
to
have
the
parking.
L
The
width
of
the
alley
is
very
concerning
to
me,
as
is
the
frontage
being
so
far
forward.
Yeah
it
just
the
tree
is
also
a
concern,
even
though
they
say
they
can
work
on
it.
It's
so
all
of
those
things
for
me
were
what
really
it's
just
too
much.
Q
B
B
C
Okay,
all
right!
There
we
go
go
ahead,
sir.
J
Danny
collins
with
your
planet,
commission
staff
have
been
sworn
in.
Our
last
case
is
in
the
south,
tampa
planning
district.
More
specifically,
the
fort
tampa
neighborhood
spanish-american
war
memorial
park
is
the
closest
public
park
being
located.
Approximately
one
mile
northeast
of
the
subject
site
closest
transit,
stop
is
located
approximately
500
feet
southwest
of
the
subject
site
at
the
intersection
of
kissimmee
street
and
commerce.
Street
site
is
within
an
evacuation
zone
and
also
within
the
coastal
hazard
area.
J
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
surrounding
properties
you'll
see
the
subject
site
is
just
on
the
north
side
of
commerce
street,
just
west
of
southwest
shore,
boulevard
and
south
of
west
prescott
street
generally
to
the
east
of
commerce
street
you
have
residential
uses.
There
are
some
non-residential
uses
adjacent
to
the
subject
site
along
commerce
street
this
land
directly
to
the
west
of
the
subject.
Site
is
presently
vacant.
J
Here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
Currently,
the
subject
majority
of
the
subject,
sites
recognized
under
the
light
industrial
future
land
use,
designation
and
then
there's
the
northern
portion
of
the
sites
recognized
under
the
residential
35
designation
direct
directly
to
the
west
of
the
subject.
Site
is
land
right.
I
recognized
in
the
residential
35
and
that's
the
east.
It's
land
res
recognized
under
the
cmu
35
future
language
designation.
J
Planning,
commission
staff
reviewed
the
surrounding
area
finds
the
request
comparable
and
compatible
this
portion
of
the
fort
tampa
neighborhood.
The
subject
site
is
east
of
an
existing
csx
rail
and
north
of
north
of
land
plan
for
light.
Industrial
uses
additionally
to
the
east
of
the
subject.
Site
are
parcels
designated
cme35
that
are
presently
being
utilized
for
light
commercial
uses.
J
Appleton
is
proposing
a
commercial
structure
and
fuel
canopy
on
the
portions
of
the
site
designated
light.
Industrial
parking
and
stormwater
infrastructure
are
provided
on
the
portions
of
the
site
designated
r35.
The
request
is
consistent
with
both
underlying
future
land
uses
on
the
site.
Pd
is
designed
for
pedestrian
accessibility
and
walkability.
J
J
My
news
policy
15.2.4
requires
commercial
uses
to
be
appropriately
buffered
from
any
residential
development.
The
applicant
is
not
requesting
any
deductions
to
the
landscape,
buffering
screening
requirements,
no
lands
to
the
west
of
the
site
are
recognized
under
the
r-35
designation
and
plan
for
residential
development.
The
csx
rail
that
runs
along
the
western
portion
of
the
subject
site
separating
the
proposed
uses
from
any
future
residential
development
on
the
budget
flooding
western
parcels.
J
All
development
and
major
renovations
shall
be
required
to
provide
a
sphere
of
building
lighting
and
shape
trees
along
sidewalks
to
encourage
pedestrian
activity
and
reduce
overall
dependence
on
automobiles
says
no
proposed
landscaping
adjacent
to
the
proposed
sidewalk
and
commerce
street
is
shown
on
the
site
planned
panic
mission
staff
requests
that
the
applicant
address
this
policy
between
first
and
second
reading
and
that's
land
use
policy.
15.2.7.
J
In
conclusion,
the
request
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
surrounding
area
consistent
with
the
underlying
future
land
use.
Designation.
Based
on
these
considerations,
planning,
commission
staff
finds
the
request
consistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
That
concludes
my
presentation
and
I'm
available
for
any
quick.
B
B
B
B
B
And
as
I
went
to
the
site,
you'll
see
the
current
state
on
the
site:
vacant
grass
you'll
have
a
vacant.
You
know
the
vacant
commercial
back
there,
also
residential
single
family,
behind
it
on
the
site
to
the
south
of
site,
as
I
stood
on
the
railroad
tracks.
Don't
try
that
at
home
but
as
I
tried
as
I
stood
on
the
railroad
tracks,
you'll
see
the
south
you'll
have
vacant
land.
B
B
After
reviewing
and
analyzing
the
site
and
the
case,
development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
this
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
consistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
land
development
code.
If
approved,
modifications
must
be
made
to
the
site
plan
between
first
and
second
reading
and
meet
all
the
revisions
stated
in
the
staff
report.
C
Any
questions
for
mr
hussein:
no
all
right.
We
have
applicants
that
are
virtual.
We
have
rachel
and
nicole.
If
you
could.
Please
turn
your
cameras
on
and
raise
your
right
hand,
so
we
can
swear
you
in.
A
I'm
nicole
weir
I'm
one
of
the
applicants.
We
are
here
today
on
behalf
of
inner
bay
point
llc,
I'm
hoping
to
receive
positive
feedback
for
our
request
for
the
rezone
to
develop
a
future
convenience.
C
Yes,
do
you
have
anything
to
say
or
add,
we've
had
some.
A
Positive
feedback
from
the
community
so
just
hoping
for
an
approval
tonight.
C
Any
questions
from
council
members:
no,
do
we
have
anybody
in
the
public
that
wishes
to
speak?
No,
I
see
we
have
stephanie
poyner
registered
to
speak
of
sheon,
miss
pointer
if
you're
on
turn
on
your
camera,
raise
your
right
hand,
we'll
swear
you
in.
C
D
C
A
Okay,
so
I'm
excited
to
talk
about
this
because
south
of
del
mar
south
of
gandhi
and
west
of
dale
mabry,
we
do
not
have
a
gas
station,
please
lord
jesus!
This
is
important.
I'm
excited
to
hear
that
the
applicant
has
said
that
they
are
willing
to
put
sidewalks
in,
even
though
there's
no
sidewalks
on
that
side
of
the
road.
I'm
excited
to
hear
them
commit
to
that.
A
I'd
like
to
see
some
small
changes
in
the
exterior
of
the
building,
because
the
port
tampa
library
is
just
across
the
street
and
so
is
the
park's
building,
which
is
both
they're,
both
historical
buildings.
So
a
little
brick,
I'm
going
city
council.
Thank
you.
If,
if
we
can
deal
with
that,
I'd
be
tickled
pink.
I
also
I
know
that
they
asked
for
a
waiver
for
the
brick
wall
or
the
the
cinder
block
wall
to
the
west
side.
That
goes
along
the
railroad
tracks.
A
I
am
totally
against
them
having
a
wall
there,
because
what
will
happen
is
it
will
end
up
being
a
hiding
spot
for
folks
who
have
no
place
to
live
and
I'm
not
against
pla
no
place
to
live,
but
it'll
end
up
being
a
junk
pile
back
there,
and
so
the
people
who
they
will
be
shielding
from
with
that
cinder
block
wall,
the
the
apartments
behind
or
to
the
west
of
them
they're,
going
to
end
up
with
a
bunch
of
garbage
hiding
out
back
there.
Bushes
are
great
because
they're
not
completely,
you
know
hiding
from
it.
A
A
C
All
right,
applicants,
nicole,
do
you
have
anything
you'd
like
to
add
or
any
questions
from
council
members
councilman
citro.
If.
F
F
Number
two,
with
being
so
close
to
the
petroleum
source
in
poor
tampa,
is
the
gas
going
to
be
cheaper.
F
B
Zain
hussain
development
coordination
last
time
I'll
talk
today,
unless
you
want
to
keep
talking
coming
to
the
side
plan
here,
as
miss
poynter
talked
about
the
sidewalks
here
to
the
east
of
the
site,
and
also
this
will
be
addressed
during
the
permitting
process,
the
sidewalks.
So
at
this
point
it's
been
shown
by
the
applicant
but
actually
it'll
be
really
appointed
and
addressed
during
the
permitting
process.
If
approved.
C
A
File
number
raz-22-21
corner
has
been
presented
first,
reconsideration
in
ordinance,
rezoning
property
of
general
city
of
4801
commerce
street
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
vertically
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district,
education,
ig,
industrial
general
and
rn
24
resident
wealthy
family
to
pd
plan
development,
retail
sales,
convenience
goods
and
gasoline
providing
effective
date,
also
adopted
fines
and
reasoning
of
the
planning
commission
in
the
city
of
city
staff
reports,
the
roles
were
zoning
assistant
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
area,
inference
of
land
use
policy
1.2.3.
A
One
point
two
point:
eight
nine
point,
three
point:
one:
nine,
four,
three,
four,
four
and
fifteen
point
two
point:
one
proposed
development
is
shown
on
site
plan
promotes
or
encourages
development
that
is
appropriate
in
location,
character
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood
in
adopt
the
revisions.
E
C
A
Yes,
I
have
some
staff
planning
commission
one
so
bear
with
me.
These
are
never
fun,
a
request
by
the
planning
commission
setting
an
adoption
hearing
for
ta,
slash,
cpa
22-04
for
may
26,
2002
or
501
pm,
and
to
direct
the
legal
department
to
provide
the
city
clerk
with
a
form
of
notice
for
advertising.
The
public
hearings.
Second,.
C
F
C
A
Number
three
request
by
planning
commission
setting
an
adoption
hearing
for
ta,
slash,
cpa,
21-26,
ta,
slash,
cpa,
21-29,
tacpa
21,
I'm
sorry,
22-01,
tacpa,
22-02
and
tacpa22-03
for
june
23rd,
2022
at
501
pm
and
to
direct
the
legal
department
to
provide
the
city
clerk
with
a
form
of
notice
for
advertising.
The
public
hearings.
F
A
And
then
I
need
to
ratify
two
commendations.
If
I
may,
I
presented
on
april
13th
2022
in
honor
of
national
boring
one
year's
day.
Oh
I'll,
you
could
put
65th
regiment
accommodation
that
day,
if
I
may
have
that
rant
advice,
most.
A
C
I
Yes,
sir,
I
just
need
to
make
a
motion
to
receive
and
file
my
form
eight
b's
from
last
week
for
item
number
43
and
44,
and
it
was
that
company
with
whom
I'm
retained
does
business
with
an
entity
that
has
an
interest
in
these
matters.
We
don't
work
on
these
matters
directly,
but
our
clients
could
benefit
from
it.
So.
I
C
F
If
we
can
I'll
rattle
these
off
rather
quickly,
excuse
me
motion
to
reschedule
the
june
7th
after
month,
officer
of
the
month,
combination
to
june
16th
regular
session
9
a.m.
We.
F
And
I
would
like
to
wish
one
of
our
tampa
family
members
miss
abby,
feely.
Yes,
a
happy
happy
birthday.
F
Miss
lisa,
I'm
sorry,
am
I
also
doing
the
atus
okay,
because
those
weren't
highlighted
I
apologize.
Forgive
me
rescheduling
I'm
going
to
reschedule
the
june
7th
atu
local
1464
employee
of
the
month,
accommodation
to
june
16th
at
9
a.m.
F
F
F
Two
of
them
one
chart
garden
general
manager
tampa
bay.
Water
has
requested
to
speak
before
tampa
city
council
on
thursday
june,
2nd
2022
at
9
00
a.m.
To
give
the
state
of
the
tampa
bay,
water
and
long-term
master
water
plan
update,
the
presentation
will
take
five
to
seven
minutes.
You
have
a
powerpoint
presentation,
you'd
like
to
be
first
as
close
to
the
top
as
possible.
Second.
F
Next
one,
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
present
accommodation
to
the
budget
office
for
receiving
the
distinguished
budget
presentation
award
for
the
year
2022
budget
from
governor
government
finance
officers
association.
This
award
is
the
highest
form
of
recognition
in
government
budgeting
and
it's
attainable
present
attains
a
significant
achievement
by
a
budget
office.
I
would
like
to
make
this
presentation
combination
on
tuesday
may
10
2022..
Second
promotion.
C
A
C
All
right,
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
present
accommodation
on
may
10
to
eileen
rosario
from
development
and
growth
management,
recognizing
her
outstanding
work
over
the
past
two
years
with
assisting
city
council
and
tampa
convention
center
on
this
and
on
the
second
floor
of
city
hall
with
our
evening
meetings.
Second,.
F
Motion
by
chairman
minnesota,
second
by
mr
citro,
all
in
favor
of
the
motion,
please
for
the
fight
for
saying
aye,
aye.
C
D
C
C
I
think
it's
black,
you
know
people
butcher
my
name
all
the
time,
so
I
try
to
make
it
easy.
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
I'd
like
to
request.
I
would
prefer
stephen
benson.
I
think,
he's
the
person
that
I
would
would
contact
on
this
to
come
to
us
under
staff
reports
to
tell
me
or
tell
us
about
what
the
city
code
says
in
regards
to
building
triplexes
and
quads
in
the
city
of
tampa.
This
is
new
construction.
C
The
reason
I'm
saying
this
is
we
have
an
affordable
housing
crisis
and
I
want
to
see
if,
if
allowing
or
changing
the
code
or
just
know
what
the
code
is
into
allowing
these
type
of
new
construction,
if
we
could
just
get
an
update
and
what
he
says
I
I
know
stephen
benson
is
very
knowledgeable
in
this
and
I'd
like
him
to
come
before
it's
july,
14th
under
staff
reports.
F
A
motion
by
chairman
minnesota
second
by
chair,
mr
goods
unfairly
emotionally
signified
for
saying,
aye
aye,
jose
the
eyes
happy.
Naturally,.
C
And
the
last
thing
is
for
our
april
28th
workshop
I'd
like
these
items
to
be
placed
as
items
three
and
four.
The
first
one
is
to
review
the
amendment
of
comprehensive
plan,
amendment
16-02
and
to
review
or
revisit
the
amendment
and
then
for
item
for
discussion
of
upcoming
tax
amendments
to
include
privately
initially
initiated
text
amendments
and
the
publicly
initiated
text
amendments
to
appear.
This
is
for
the
april
28th
workshop
agenda
for
items
three
and
for
items
four
approached
by.