►
From YouTube: TCC PM 2/10/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
G
C
Yes,
I
am,
mr
chairman,
if
you
can
hear
me
and
for
those
who
can
see
me,
martin
shelby,
on
the
go
to
meeting
platform
tonight,
thursday
february
10,
2022,
it's
after
501
pm
and
the
city
council
is
here
this
evening.
This
is
almost
like.
You
did
some
of
the
land
use
from.
G
G
G
H
C
Okay,
now,
as
you've
heard,
a
physical
quorum
is
present
in
the
chambers.
However,
in
light
of
continuing
covet,
19
government
issued
health
standards
or
guidance
and
effect
members
of
the
public
have
the
ability
tonight
to
participate
virtually
through
video
teleconferencing
referred
to
by
florida's
statutes
and
rules
as
communications
media
technology,
the
public
and
the
citizens
of
the
city
of
tampa
are
able
to
watch,
listen
and
view
this
meeting
on
spectrum
channel
640,
frontier
channel
15
and
on
the
internet
at
tampa.gov
forward
slash
live
stream.
C
Now,
if
the
public
wants
to
pre-register,
they
have
done
so
now.
I
have
to
state
that,
in
order
to
participate
via
cmt
for
quasi-judicial
matters,
you
must
have
access
to
a
device
such
as
a
tablet
or
a
computer
equipped
with
a
camera
and
microphone
that
will
enable
you
to
be
both
seen
and
heard
by
city,
council
and
other
participants.
C
Now,
for
these
specific
two-way
video,
virtual
meeting
formats,
cell
phones
and
smartphones
are
not
compatible
as
they
will
not
allow
you
to
share
your
camera
when
connected
again.
The
instructions
are
available
on
the
city
council's
web
page.
If
you
click
on
the
link
that
says
tampa,
dot
gov
forward
slash
quasi
q-u-a-s-I,
now
a
reminder
that
any
registered
participant
who
wishes
to
show
powerpoint,
regis
presentations,
renderings
photos
or
other
documents
during
the
meeting.
C
Now
for
those
people
who
don't
have
communications,
media
technology
and
wishes
wish
to
come
to
old
city
hall,
they
may
do
so
because,
on
the
second
floor
we
have
the
city
providing
cmt
facilities
and
that
is
at
315
east
kennedy
boulevard.
On
the
second
floor
now,
please
note
that
use
of
masks
and
social
distancing
inside
the
building
are
encouraged.
C
The
public
has
had
opportunities
to
comment
in
advance
via
email
and
they
have
to
be
received.
Emails
do
have
to
be
received
in
order
to
be
made
part
of
the
record
two
business
days
prior
to
the
hearing
date
in
order
to
be
included
in
the
record
of
the
hearing.
Now
those
matters
that
have
been
received,
those
written
comments,
petitions
and
other
letters
are
accessible
to
the
public
for
view
at
tampa.gov
forward,
slash
agendas
and
then
what
happens?
C
Is
you
scroll
to
the
meeting
type
click
on
the
hearing
date
and
then
you'll
be
able
to
see
the
written
comments
now
written
comments
received
by
mail
or
email
have
been
distributed
to
the
city
council
and
will
also
be
included
in
the
permanent
record
of
the
meeting,
and
all
comments
timely
received
will
be
afforded
equal
consideration
as
if
the
comments
were
made
in
person
also
with
regard
to
the
go
to
meeting
platform,
the
platform
that
I
am
on
tonight,
please
note:
there
is
a
chat
function,
but
that
chat
function
is
not
to
be
used
to
communicate
with
the
city
council
members.
C
The
purpose
of
this
meeting
is
an
open
public
meeting
and
the
time
to
participate
is
now
and
not
through
technology
which
usually
or
does
require
advanced
submission
in
order
to
be
considered.
So
that
being
said,
mr
chairman,
these
are
contained
in
the
notice
of
the
meeting,
and
these
are
a
change
to
your
standing
rule.
So
I'd
ask
you
to
make
a
motion
to
waive
the
rules
to
adopt
the
hybrid
rules
that
we've
discussed
tonight.
Motion.
G
Wave
mr
miranda
has
moved
it
same
with
mr
carlson
on
favor
the
opposed.
Thank
you,
mr
chevy.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
All
right,
you
have
staff
any
housekeeping
measures
at
this
time.
I'm
sorry
we'll
go
with
ceremonies.
I'm
sorry.
G
E
Oh
no
you're,
fine
man,
mr
chair
man,
I'm
sorry
long
day,
fine
man!
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
It's
my
pleasure
to
welcome
cub
scout
pac
16
for
the
pledge
of
allegiance.
The
ceremony
will
be
performed
by
the
we
below
two
scouts,
which
is
the
final
rank
before
they
cross
over
to
the
boy
scouts.
E
Here
we
have
with
us
mr
larry
colon,
who
is
the
den
leader
and
a
proud
parent,
andre,
andre
ferreira,
kayden
rav
and
lena
halaby,
who
will
be
doing
the
pledge
of
allegiance
and
coming
forward
with
her
flags,
so
leave
it
to
these
good
scouts.
Thank
you.
E
A
J
G
Oh,
thank
you,
mr
mr
vieira.
That's
the
scoutmaster,
we
don't
forget
him
back
there.
He
was
training
these
people
for
young
people
for
leadership.
You
know.
Oh,
my
name
is
larry
clown
and
I'm.
G
Well,
thank
you
for
volunteering,
your
time
and
your
services
for
the
scouts
you've
got
to
find
a
group
of
young
people
there
and
thank
you,
mr
vera,
for
allowing
them
to
come
here
and
share
with
us
today,
sir.
G
G
C
C
Therefore
they
do
require
the
witnesses
to
be
sworn
in
and
again
it
requires
you
to
base
your
decision
on
the
competent,
substantial
evidence.
That's
brought
forth
in
the
record,
and
that
being
the
case,
this
is
the
point
where
I'd
like
to
remind
city
council
of
the
necessity
to
disclose
any
ex
parte
communications
that
you
may
have
received
relative
to
any
of
the
hearings
that
have
not
yet
been
disclosed.
C
So
I
ask
you
to
please
do
so
now
and
if
you
can,
or
certainly
definitely
by
the
start
of
each
hearing
where
you've
had
ex
parte
communications
now
for
the
purposes
of
having
the
ex
parte
communications
that
have
been
uploaded
by
the
city
clerk.
I'd
like
there
to
be
a
motion
to
receive
and
file
those
into
the
record
at
this
time,.
G
Mr
citrus
moved
it
miss
mascara.
Second,
all
in
favor
any
favor
all.
C
G
Mr
mr
shelby,
I'm
sorry
I
just
looked
down
and
little
jury.
Just
took
my
medicines,
I'm
a
little
jitterous
to
see
him
and
apologize.
Gentlemen
item
number
six
with
the
harbor
island
situation,
sir.
I
I
received
a
call
a
while
ago
from
former,
I
believe,
he's
a
property
appraiser
doug
belden.
He
called
in
reference
to
opposition.
Does
this
matter?
I
did
not.
I
didn't
know
getting
the
conversation
with
him,
but
I
believe
he
did
submit
a
letter
in
that
quasi-issue
box.
I
believe,
sir,
so
just
for
the
record.
C
O
C
Thank
you,
council
members.
Mr
chairman,
we
have
had
a
request
with
regard
to
item
number
nine
to
move
that
up
and
take
that
as
the
first
item
after
the
ceremonial.
So
that
could
be
done
unless
there's
an
objection.
You
can
just
do
that.
Mr
chairman,
as
part
of
the
housekeeping
any.
G
Objection
number
nine,
mr
mr
cross,
did
you
recognize
her,
mr
carlson
recognized?
There's
no.
C
G
All
right
so
we'll
continue
on
you're
asking
that
item
number
nine
be
moved
to
be
heard.
First
correct,
mr
shelby.
C
G
All
right,
no
objection,
that'll
be
no
objection.
No!
No
objection!
Mr
shelby,
we'll
move
the
item.
We'll
move
to
the
first
item.
No
objection.
C
Okay,
now,
with
regard
to
items
number
item,
number
11.,
that
is
to
be
heard
with
item
number
15
and
the
vacate.
Is
the
item
number
15.
So
I'm
going
to
ask
that
item
15
be
heard
first
before
number
11.
So
that
means
that
item
15
will
follow
item
10
and
then
after
item
15,
we
can
hear
item
11..
If
that's
okay
with
council
and
no
objection
that
would
be
able
to
have
those
two
items
heard
together.
Any.
C
Okay,
thank
you
and
I
believe
there
are
continuance
requests
and
I
believe
one
item
cannot
be
heard
and
I
believe
who
is
on
from
mr,
mr
hussein.
Hi
hey
good
evening,
good.
I
Evening,
sir
hussein
development
coordination-
yes,
there
is
a
one
requested,
continuance,
rz
21-52,
that's
been
requested
to
continue
to
512
2022
at
501
pm.
C
And
do
we
have
the
applicant's
representative
online
with
regard
to
items
five
and
six.
K
K
K
C
Correct
okay,
mr
chairman,
you
may
want
to
inquire
if
there's
anybody
who
wants
to
speak
to
just
the
continuance
before
we
actually
move
to
continue.
A
G
All
right,
miss
mandel.
H
Good
evening
it's
julie
mandel,
I'm
here
in
representation
of
the
south
neighborhood
association
of
harbor
island.
As
I've
indicated
we
we
are
fine
with
the
continuance.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
it's
going
to
be
continued
to
the
may
12th
night
meeting,
as
opposed
to,
I
think
at
one
point
they
had
asked
for
the
april
meeting.
So
thank
you.
C
Okay,
mr
chairman,
I
just
wanted
to
share
that.
I
wasn't
able
to
see
ms
mandel
on
the
second
floor,
just
so
that
cttv
could
do
that
on
the
go
to
meeting
platform.
That
would
be
great.
That
being
said,
is
there
anybody
who's
registered
to
speak
on.
C
A
note
to
the
public
that
the
continuance
to
may
12th
22
at
501
pm
is
the
only
notice
that
you
will
receive
there
will
be
no
additional
signage
or
no
additional
mailed
notice.
So
please
public
do
make
note
of
the
date
of
the
continuance
a
motion
to
continue.
Mr.
N
G
H
A
I
Be
heard
today,
that's
agenda
item
number
fourteen
fourteen
case
r,
z,
21-129.
I
I
Removed
miss
noticed
today
and
we've
moved
it
to
the
428
2022
public
hearing
at
501
pm.
C
G
G
M
Yes,
sir,
I'd
like
to
read
a
statement
into
the
record:
I'm
sorry
it's
a
little
bit
long
since,
since
approximately
november
10
2021
city
council
members
have
received
public
records
requests
from
lawyers.
On
behalf
of
mr
miccolini
and
follow-up
requests
on
january
19th
and
24th
like
the
rest
of
council,
I
have
been
responding
and
continuing
to
work
to
respond
to
those
public
records
requests
and
intend
to
respond
to
them
completely.
M
Amendment
again,
I
was
fair
and
impartial
in
that
vote,
for
which
I
was
in
the
minority
and
the
application
passed
the
next
day
february
4th
I
received
a
public
records
request
directed
to
me
from
mr
mccolliny's
council
requesting
information
regarding
mr
micolini
council,
member
dingfelder
and
a
person
I
don't
know
james
reid.
I
have
been
working
diligently
with
an
I.t
team
to
respond
to
that
request.
On
tuesday
february
8th,
I
received
a
subpoena
from
mr
mcelini's
attorney,
which
all
the
council
members
by
now
have
also
received
asking
for
information.
M
Regarding
mr
michelini,
on
tuesday
night,
I
received
a
message
from
a
reporter
at
the
tampa
bay
business
journal,
who
told
me
that
a
pure
bill
of
discovery
had
been
filed
with
the
hillsborough
court
to
demand
to
know
the
identity
of
the
facebook
user
james
reed.
I
understand
that
the
pure
bill
of
discovery
does
not
mention
my
name
and
makes
no
allegations
about
me.
M
However,
someone
delivered
that
document
and
the
public
records
request
that
I
received
on
friday
february,
4th
to
that
reporter
and
alleged
that
I
was
somehow
using
the
alias
of
james
reed
on
social
media.
I
informed
the
reporter
that
I
do
not
know
james
reid.
I
am
not
friends
with
him
on
social
media
and
I
have
no
idea
who
he
is
further.
I
told
her
that
I
do
not
use
aliases.
M
I
am
well
known
to
state
my
opinion
under
my
own
name.
Despite
this,
an
article
was
published
in
the
tampa
bay
business
journal
yesterday,
fairway
9.
That
suggests
that
I
used
an
alias
to
post
as
james
reid
today
february
10,
the
city
received
an
inquiry
by
a
reporter
from
florida
politics
to
ask
for
a
copy
of
the
public
records
request
regarding
james
reid
that
I
received
on
friday.
I
assume
that
this
also
will
result
in
a
story.
M
I
do
not
know
the
identity
of
the
person
who
is
spreading
this
false
information
about
me
to
the
media
and
elsewhere,
although
I
feel
that
I
could
be
fair
and
impartial,
I
want
the
public
and
mr
micolini
to
know
that
I
have
do
not
have
any
question
about
my
impartiality,
so
in
the
abundance
of
caution.
I
am
abstaining
today
from
any
vote
set
from
from
any
vote
set
forth
in
my
form
8b.
Mr
chair,
for
the
record.
I
would
like
to
move
to
receive
and
file
my
form
8b
to
that
form.
M
G
Mr
miranda,
a
second
have
a
second
for
mr
macarthur
wisconsin
to
receive
a
file.
G
He'll
accuse
me
it's
one
of
those
days
right
now.
Please
forgive
me.
Mr
carlson
has
moved
his
motion
and
mr
miranda,
second
all
in
favor
all
right.
Any
opposed
motion
granted.
G
Mr
veer,
the
motion
was
that
mr
carlson
made
a
statement
for
the
record
in
reference
to
some
public
record
requests.
Yes,
and
some
of
the
actions
that
have
been
taken
against
this
council
and
it's
kind
of
disheartening
that
we
continue
to
won't
use
the
word
attacked,
but
it
seemed
like
if
we
don't
go
to
a
certain
way.
We
don't
do
something
with
certain
people.
We
we
we're
we're
under
siege
a
little
bit.
G
I
think
everyone
is
feeling
that
on
this
council
and
the
public,
the
public
is
seeing
that
we're
an
organization
we're
here
for
the
public
and
sometimes
vote,
don't
go
certain
people
away,
but
it
doesn't
mean
that
we're
being
impartial,
we're
just
doing
the
people's
business.
I
think
it
may
come
a
time
there.
Mr
shelby
may
need
to
meet
with
council
members
or
meet
with
this
council
as
it
relates
to
what's
going
on
in
these
subpoenas
and
some
of
these
actions
that
are
being
taken
against
this
council.
G
I
think
it's
unjust
at
times
and
it's
becoming
very
stressful,
the
council
members
and
there's
some
council
members
becoming
costly.
So
at
some
point
we're
gonna
have
to
deal
with
this.
Mr
shelby,
you
and
the
city
attorney's
office,
because
it's
kind
of
getting
obviously
out
of
control
and
it's
really
taking
a
toll
on
council
members.
E
M
H
P
I
D
Danny
collins,
with
your
planning
commission
staff,
I've
been
sworn
in
before
we
get
started.
I
want
to
make
a
correction
for
the
record.
At
the
bottom
of
page,
four
of
our
report
proposed
rezoning.
We
state
that
the
pro
post
rezoning
would
allow
consideration
up
to
five
units
or
up
to
six
units.
I
want
to
correct
it
that
the
proposed
rezoning
could
potentially
resolve
into
five
maximum
five
units,
so
our
statement
was
incorrect
in
our
report.
D
So
our
first
case
is
in
the
central
tampa
planning
districts
and,
more
specifically,
it's
in
the
west
tampa
urban
village.
The
closest
public
recreation
facility
is
west
pine
park,
which
is
located
four
blocks.
Northwest
of
the
subject
site
closest
transit
stops
are
approximately
a
thousand
feet
to
the
northwest
of
the
subject:
site
transit,
stop
at
the
northwest,
serviced
by
part
route,
14
providing
connections
to
britain
plaza
and
yukon
transfer
center
subject.
Site
is
located
in
a
level
c
evacuation
zone.
D
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
in
the
surrounding
properties.
You'll
see
the
subject
sites
located
at
the
southwest
corner
of
north
albany
avenue
and
west
north
b
street.
The
surrounding
development
patterns,
predominantly
residential
to
the
north,
east
and
south
of
the
subject
site
there's
also
a
residential
unit
to
the
west
of
the
site.
One
block
to
the
west
is
north
howard
avenue,
which
contains
non-residential
uses.
D
Here's
a
here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map
the
subject
sites
currently
recognized
under
the
residential
20
future
land
use
designation.
It's
surrounded
by
that
r20
on
all
sides
within
one
block,
south
and
west
of
the
subject.
Site
is
land
recognized
under
the
cmu
community.
Mixed
use,
35
future
land
use
designation
and
then
this
darker
brown
color
on
just
the
northeast
of
the
subject
site
is
land
recognized
under
the
residential
35.
D
There
is
some
umu
60
two
blocks
south
of
the
subject
site
along
west
kennedy,
boulevard,
finding
commission
staff
reviewed
the
request
and
finds
the
request
that
will
have
no
adverse
impacts
on
the
surrounding
area.
It's
portion
of
north
albany
avenue
between
west
north
8th
street
west
big
street,
excluding
the
subject
site,
has
an
existing
density
of
8.2
units
per
acre,
which
is
well
below
the
density
anticipated
under
the
residential
20
future
land
use.
D
Designation
again,
the
request
will
allow
consideration
of
the
six
quelling
units
and
an
overall
density
of
16
kilometers
per
acre,
so
it
is
under
on
the
density
anticipated
under
the
residential
20
designation.
D
The
request
is
consistent
with
the
urban
village
and
housing
policies
of
the
plan.
The
subject
site
is
within
the
west.
Tampa
urban
village.
The
comprehensive
plan
seeks
to
direct
the
greatest
share
of
growth
to
the
urban
centers
and
villages.
The
site
is
also
one
block
north
of
west
canyon
boulevard,
which
is
a
major
corridor
and
within
two
blocks
two
miles
to
tampa's
downtown
core.
D
This
proposal
will
encourage
residential
development
on
underutilized
lots
and
provide
additional
housing
opportunities
within
proximity
to
downtown
core
and
the
west
stanford
urban
village.
In
conclusion,
the
planet
commission
staff
has
determined
that
the
proposed
rezoning
will
allow
for
a
development
that
is
within
the
character
of
the
surrounding
area
and
consistent
with
the
long-range
development
pattern
anticipated.
I
D
D
I
If
you
look
at
the
aerial
here,
you'll
see
that
the
property
is,
has
a
13
640
square
feet,
it's
currently
a
vacant
site
and
is
located
at
the
northeast
intersection
of
north
albany
avenue
and
north
b
street
west
north
b
street
in
the
surrounding
area.
You'll
see
a
mixture
of
residential
uses
varying
in
degree
of
intensities
in
the
immediate
area.
I
I
I
As
I
went
to
the
site,
it
is
currently
vacant
at
the
time
to
the
west.
You
have
the
single-family
residential
houses
to
the
east.
You
have
a
assisted
link
facility
and
also
residential
single-family
homes
to
the
south.
You
also
have
residential
single
family
homes
and
to
the
north
up
and
down
the
street.
You
have
residential
single-family
homes.
I
The
development
review
and
compliance
staff
have
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
it
overall
consistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
land
development
code,
modifications
to
the
site
plan
as
there
won't
be
needed
any
for
as
euclidean
are
not
needed
to
be
provided.
Thank
you
I'm
here
for
any
questions.
If
needed,.
Q
Q
This
is
currently
the
zone
pd
for
six
six
units
and
we're
requesting
that
this
go
be
reduced
in
the
zoning
classification,
so
that
we
can
build
four
units
that
will
comply
with
all
the
setbacks
established
by
the
city,
the
city
staff
and
the
planning
commission
both
found
it
to
be
consistent.
We've
received
no
objections.
G
G
G
Sorry,
all
right,
second
by
mr
matascalco
roll
call,
please
see.
Q
H
Q
Q
D
This
is
danny
collins
again
with
your
planning,
commission
staff.
I've
been
sworn
in.
Our
next
case
is
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district.
The
site
is
just
west
of
the
university
of
tampa
and
a
portion
of
the
site
is
within
the
west.
Tampa
urban
village
host's
public
recreation
facility
is
julie.
Lane
riverfront
park,
which
is
located
approximately
a
half
mile
to
the
northeast
of
the
subject
site
site,
is
within
proximity
of
two
transit
stops
that
are
located
north
at
the
intersection
of
north
boulevard
and
west
castry
and
south.
D
D
The
surrounding
properties,
you'll
see,
subject,
site
is
outlined
in
this
purple,
color
subject,
site
is
just
just
west
of
north
boulevard
and
overall,
the
university
of
tampa
is
just
to
the
southwest
of
tampa
prepper
tampa
prep
you'll
see
the
surrounding
areas
predominantly
non-residential
to
the
east
and
then,
as
you
move
north
east
north
and
I'm
sorry,
north
west
and
west
north
willow,
you
get
into
some
into
a
residential
area.
D
This
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
Currently
the
subject
sites
recognized
under
the
urban
mix
260
agent
land
use
designation.
It
is
surrounded
by
that
umu
60
to
the
east.
D
Industrial
development
pattern
to
more
of
a
mixed-use
urban
neighborhood
portion
of
the
subject
site
is
also
located
within
the
west
tampa
under
the
village,
where
the
plan
seeks
to
direct
the
city's
greatest
share
of
growth,
showing
the
site
is
in
a
location
that
encourages
info
on
a
higher
density
of
residential
development
that
is
less
than
one
mile
west
central
business
district
comprehensive
plan
supports
infill
development
such
as
this
proposal
that
brings
additional
density
into
the
areas
currently
served
in
proximity
to
transit
and
that
are
located
within
proximity
to
employment,
centers
plan
the
pd
supports
policies
in
the
plan
relating
to
development
in
multi-family
areas
and
along
and
within
mixed-use
corridors.
D
The
proposed
development
provides
a
five-foot
internal
sidewalk
with
the
pedestrian
pathway
to
the
proposed
entrances,
which
is
occurred
encouraged
by
the
comprehensive
plan.
Finding
commission
staff
is
supportive
of
proposed
connection,
but
requests
that
a
node
is
added
to
the
site
plan,
labeling
the
front
doors
between
first
and
second
reading.
D
Overall,
the
proposed
plan
development
is
consistent
with
the
overall
policy
correction
conference
plan
and
would
provide
for
a
development
as
comparable
compatible
the
long-range
development
trends
in
the
surrounding
area.
Based
on
those
considerations,
finding
commission
staff
finds
requests
assistant
with
the
city
of
tampa
conference
of
plan.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
I
The
applicant
is
proposing
a
rezone
from
ig
industrial
general
to
pd
plan
development
residential
multi-family.
There
are
four
proposed
waivers
number
one
to
reduce
the
number
of
parking
spaces
from
462
spaces
to
428,
which
is
a
7.4
percent
reduction.
I
The
second
is
to
request
a
maximum
su
point,
30
point
class
truck
to
fill
out
access
and
to
use
the
loading
burst
in
one
continuous
maneuver
in
lieu
of
a
wb
dot,
50
class
truck
and
to
reduce
the
minimum
loading
space
dimensions
from
12
feet
times,
60
feet
to
12
feet
times
30
feet
and
then
the
third
waivers
to
request
to
reduce
the
east
side
yard
setback
along
the
csx
tracks
from
five
feet
to
zero
feet
for
building
two.
The
parking
structure
only.
I
As
we
move
on
to
the
overhead
aerial,
you'll
see
the
parcel
out
here
outlined
in
red.
If
you
look
to
the,
if
you
look
to
the
east,
you
will
have
a
university
of
tampa
athletic
fields
and,
of
course,
the
university
down
here
to
the
east
and
the
south
to
the
northeast.
You'll
have
tampa
prep
high
school
located
to
the
west.
You'll
have
residential
multi-family,
single
family
and
commercial
and
to
the
north
of
north
boulevard.
I
You
have
armature
works
up
to
the
north,
and
also
you
have
a
amazing
office
development
services
for
the
city
of
tampa.
Also,
if
I
may
say
so
myself,
the
project
here
is
a
total
site
area
of
168
380
square
feet
or
3.87
acres.
I
It's
along
the
former
railroad
tracks
also
moving
along
you'll,
see
the
railroad
tracks
located
on
the
plans.
I
To
the
north
of
site,
you'll
have
op1
and
also
school
use
in
tampa
prep
to
the
south
of
the
site.
You'll
have
a
school
use,
being
ut
and
also
commercial
to
the
east
of
the
site.
You'll
have
also
school
use
and
to
the
west
side,
you'll
have
commercial
and
also
residential.
I
I
Vehicular
access
to
the
site
is
provided
on
north,
a
street
north
b
street
west
fig
street
and
west
carmen
street.
I
The
subject
property
looking
northward
towards
the
intersection
of
west
castro
and
north
boulevard,
and
you
see
downtown
and
ut
the
subject
property
facing
south
from
the
intersection
of
west
cast
street
and
north
boulevard
is
the
parking
garage
multi-story.
I
As
you
see
shown
here,
is
a
property
located
west
of
the
subject
site
along
west
carmen
street.
The
property
is
zoned,
pd
and
approved
for
251
units
with
a
max
building
height
of
73
feet,
as
you
see
here
shown
here
is
the
back
of
the
university
of
tampa
parking
garage,
and
this
is
on
west
fex,
west
fig
street
and
the
parking
garage
is
on
located
on
the
west
of
the
site.
I
I
I
I
K
Hello,
elise,
batzell
401,
east
jackson,
street.
May
I
share
my
screen,
mr
chairman.
G
K
Have
quite
a
few
folks
from
our
development
team,
so
we'll
just
get
them
behind
so
that
we
can
be
sworn
in.
H
K
K
It
is
bear
with
me,
I'm
sorry
we're
having
just
a
technical
issue.
Oh
how
do
I
not
do
that
hold
on
one?
Second,
we're
we
got
to
stop
sharing
every
share.
You
don't
want
to
see
all
my
notes.
K
Okay,
great
sorry
about
that.
Okay,
north
of
kennedy,
boulevard,
west
of
downtown
and
the
university
of
tampa.
K
This
is
3.87
acres,
as
they
mentioned,
we're
adjacent
to
the
csx
rail
line,
but
we're
not.
Actually
we
don't
include
the
rail
line
in
our
property.
We
are
part
of
the
central
tampa
planning
district,
the
west
tampa
urban
village,
just
a
0.7
mile,
walk
to
the
heart
of
the
central
business
district
and
adjacent
to
the
university
of
tampa.
K
This
slide
just
shows
you
an
overview,
a
two-scale
overview
of
everything.
That's
surrounding
it.
You
can
see
the
close
proximity
to
downtown
and
the
buildings
west
of
the
property
which
are
currently
under
construction.
There's
two
multi-family
buildings
directly
adjacent
and
you
can
also
see
the
university
of
tampa.
K
K
This
project
is
very
similar
but
less
intense
than
the
two
adjacent
developments.
We'll
talk
about
a
little
bit
later
that
you
recently
approved
in
2020
and
2019.
K
K
Specifically,
you
can
see
outlined
the
two
recent
multi-family
projects
that
were
approved,
and
I
wanted
to
highlight
too
the
new
tgh
site,
which
is
in
close
proximity
a
little
bit
further
to
the
north
and
the
west.
It's
a
mix
of
commercial
multi-family
and
single
family.
You
can
also
see
the
kennedy
corridor
in
blue
directly
to
the
south.
K
K
Just
to
give
you
an
overview
of
the
project,
this
is
a
rezoning
from
ig
to
pd.
As
you
just
saw
it's
currently
vacant.
We
are
proposing
249
multi-family
residential
units
and,
while
they're
not
limited
to
student
housing,
we
do
believe
that
many
students
from
the
use
of
university
of
tampa
will
ultimately
become
residents.
K
K
We
have
requested
three
waivers,
given
the
very
long
narrow
shape
of
the
site.
We
have
only
requested
three
waivers
and
it
took
us
a
while
to
get
it
down
to
three
because
we're
very
physically
constrained
on
this
site,
but
the
projects
that
this
council
recently
approved
just
west
of
the
site
actually
had
five
or
six
waivers
and
those
sites
were
not
physically
constrained.
So
we're
very
happy
to
only
come
to
you
with
three
waivers
tonight.
K
K
K
K
If
you
look
at
the
chart,
the
general
land
development
code
parking
requirements
would
require
462
spaces
on
this
site.
But
if
we
were
in
seminole
heights,
which
is
really
less
urban
in
this
area,
we
would
only
be
required
to
provide
364
parking
spaces,
and
if
we
were
in
the
central
business
district,
we
would
only
be
able
to
only
be
required
to
provide
239.
K
So
the
second
waiver
that
we're
asking
for
deals
with
the
maximum
truck
sizes.
Now
your
load,
your
truck
size
and
loading
birth
requirements,
consider
deliveries,
but
given
that
this
is
a
multi-family
development,
there's
really
no
need
on
this
site
for
large
delivery
trucks.
In
fact,
we
contacted
several
moving
companies
and
confirmed
that
for
a
four
bedroom
apartment,
which
would
be
the
largest
size
that
we
would
even
contemplate
in
the
site.
A
30-foot
30-foot
truck
delivery
would
be
more
than
sufficient.
K
This
also
requests
the
request
matches
your
local
delivery
standards,
which
contemplate
a
30-foot
truck
and
the
final
waiver
that
we're
asking
for
is
a
waiver
from
the
west
tampa
overlay
requirements
that
will
require
on
the
east
side
of
the
property.
That's
right
along
the
csx
tracks
that
we
had
a
five
foot
setback.
K
Now
this
property
is
only
80
feet
in
width,
and
so
our
garage
from
an
architectural
standpoint
is
designed
just
as
narrow,
as
is
feasible,
to
get
cars
in
and
out
the
waiver
that
we're
asking
for
only
applies
to
the
one
building
and
that's
the
parking
structure,
which
is
not
only
adjacent
to
csx
railway,
but
further
behind
csx
is
a
ut
parking
structure,
so
this
isn't
going
to
be
against
anything
other
than
another
parking
structure.
K
K
We're
going
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
multimodal
integration
a
little
bit
later,
but
you
can
see
from
those
these
two
renderings
how
we've
used
sidewalks
and
paths
to
connect.
In
fact,
the,
if
you
look
at
the
rendering
on
the
the
right
you'll
see
that
we
actually
have
pedestrian
connections
through
the
parking
garage,
not
where
there's
vehicular.
But
we've
created
these
nice
pedestrian
connections
through
the
project.
K
This
is
the
multimodal
slide
you
can
see
here
that
there
are
a
number
of
opportunities
for
on-street
bicycles,
on-street
bike
lanes
parking
on
the
street
as
well
as
sidewalks
to
integrate
this
property
with
the
surrounding
areas.
So,
in
addition
to
all
of
the
pedestrian
and
vehicular
integration
that
we've
provided
on
our
site,
this
area
also
provides
just
a
great
opportunity
for
multimodal
access.
K
Now
one
thing
that
I
wanted
to
talk
about
was
something
that
you
spoke
about
during
the
comprehensive
plan
amendment.
I
think
it
was
commissioner
or
councilman
dean
felder,
but
it
might
have
been
councilman
goodes.
One
of
the
concerns
was
well
hey.
What
happens
when
this
csx
rail
line
is
no
longer
operational?
Maybe
the
city
wants
to
turn
it
into
commuter
rail.
Maybe
we
want
to
do
the
rails
to
trails
project
and
turn
it
into
a
pedestrian
greenway.
K
And
we
also
did
a
number
of
things
in
talking
with
the
community
members
who
own
adjacent
properties
right
around
this
property.
We
reduced
our
density.
As
we
just
discussed.
We
actually
moved
the
parking
structure
towards
csx.
At
the
request
of
one
of
the
neighbors,
we
agreed
to
pedestrian
pedestrian
scale
lighting
to
go
all
along
our
western
pedestrian
pedestrian
path
and,
of
course,
we
agreed
that
there
would
be
no
fences
or
gates
along
the
pedestrian
path
to
the
west.
The
only
fencing
would
be
along
that
csx
rail
line.
K
Just
very
briefly,
we
did
have
a
professional
planning
report
prepared
by
cynthia
speidel
who
profound
that,
in
her
professional
opinion,
the
project
was
consistent
with
a
comprehensive
plan
and
the
land
development
code
and
compatible
with
the
surrounding
areas.
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
for
just
one
minute
to
cynthia
so
that
she
can
share
the
highlights
of
her
report.
H
H
Hello,
my
name
is
cynthia
spidell,
I'm
an
aicp
planner
with
over
16
years
of
experience,
and
I
just
wanted
to
share
with
you
that
there's
a
detailed
report
in
the
binder
that
we
handed
out
that
really
goes
into
a
lot
more
depth
about
the
consistency,
analysis
and
review
that
we
did
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
the
land
development
code
and
really,
in
summary,
it's
a
tale
of
two
two
villages
right.
H
The
majority
of
the
project
is
within
the
west,
tampa
urban
village,
and
then
we've
got
this
university
of
tampa
areas
in
close
proximity,
but
historically
it
was
really
bifurcated
through
the
csx
railroad.
And
what
what
I
like
about
this
story
is
that
this
infill
development
is
taking
this
this
space,
that's
currently
vacant
and
not
necessarily
inviting
to
pedestrians
and
really
transforming
it
into
a
vibrant
area
that
is
more
aesthetically,
pleasing
and
walkable.
And
it's
really
going
to
bring
these
two
areas
together.
H
It's
going
to
provide
a
unique
residential
info
opportunity
and
to
meet
the
needs
of
the
growing
population.
I
personally
know
people
who
are
desperate
for
living
accommodations
in
close
proximity
university
of
tampa
and
it's
leveraging
site
constraints
through
the
vertical
integration
of
living
and
parking,
and
it
really
promotes
the
connectivity
of
historically
bifurcated
communities.
So
it
really
fosters
disconnect
connectivity,
western
village
with
the
university
of
tampa
area,
and
we
agree
with
staff's
recommendation
in
terms
of
consistency
with
the
comp
plan.
So
the
transportation
issue
is
separate
aside.
H
K
Well,
we
just
have
a
couple
more
slides
in
conclusion,
while
overall
there
is
an
inconsistency
finding
you
can
see
that
development
coordination,
the
hillsborough
county
planning,
commission,
natural
resources,
solid
waste,
storm
water,
wastewater,
water,
tampa
fire
rescue
and
urban
design
have
all
found
the
project
consistent,
and
we
are
just
really
excited
about
this
potential
for
a
vibrant
urban
infill
development.
K
With
respect
to
the
waivers,
we
did
prepare
a
six-page
memorandum
which
was
submitted
to
sire.
That
has
a
much
deeper
and
not
more
more,
more
detailed
explanation
and
justification
for
all
those
waivers.
Obviously,
within
the
short
time
period
that
we
have
tonight,
we
can't
go
into
every
single
detail,
but
we'd
be
happy
to
provide
any
more
information
that
you
would
like.
So
with
that,
if
you
don't
mind,
we
will
stop
our
presentation
and
ask
any
questions.
Answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
Mr
chairman,.
O
K
D
K
D
O
K
R
Thank
you
good
evening,
mr
chairman
miss
batsell.
Good
evening
I
was
actually
was
listening
on
my
phone
as
I
was
coming
in
I
I
was
not
able
to
see
the
actual
visual
presentation,
but
I'm
just
wondering
at
least
if
you
could-
and
I
apologize
to
council,
but
I
want
to
be
fully
informed.
If
I'm
going
to
vote,
can
you
jump
back
to
your
slide?
R
That
shows,
if
you
have
one
that
shows
what
the
what
this
is
going
to
look
like
from
you
know,
as
one
would
be
coming,
I
I
assume
you're
see
it
from
kennedy.
K
K
K
So,
if
you're
looking
at
it
from
the
south,
this
is
sort
of
just
this
is
a
little
bit
of
an
overview,
but
you're
gonna
see
the
buildings
here,
I'm
going
to
show
you
another
slide,
which
shows
you
a
little
bit
more
of
the
so
this
is.
This
is
from
cass
looking
south.
K
K
K
R
Okay,
all
right,
I've
got
a
better
feel
for
it.
So
I
can't
remember
if
I
feel
like
we
started
seeing
this
project
a
while
back.
R
K
The
comprehensive
plan
amendment
that
went
and
took
this
property
to
umu
60.
I
wasn't
the
applicant's
representative
at
that
time
and
you
had
some
specific
comments.
I'm
not
sure
if
you
heard
in
the
presentation,
but
I
think
it
was
you
or
maybe
another
council
member-
about
access
to
the
rail
so
I'll.
Just
take
one
second
and
repeat
that
real,
quick
and
show
you
on
the
next
to
willow.
K
Here
this
area
in
blue.
You
can
see
it
here
on
our
site
plan.
We
are
providing
a
debt
of
perpetual
non-exclusive
public
access
easement.
That
way.
If,
for
example,
in
the
future,
you
have
rails
to
trails
or
this
becomes
a
commuter
rail
line,
the
public
is
always
going
to
be
able
to
traverse
the
site
from
east
to
west
to
get
access
to
that
rail
line.
R
Right
that-
and
that
was
part
of
the
discussion-
I
think
that
was
also
part
of
the
staff
objection
from
transportation
staff
initially
as
related
to
the
project
they
wanted
to
make
sure
there
was
plenty
of
cross
cross
access
easement.
Is
that
the
only
across
access
that
you're
providing?
And
how
does
that?
How
does
that
north
a
relate
to
the
entire
project.
K
Sure,
let's,
let's
go
back
to
the
full
site
plan.
H
K
So
what
you
were
seeing
there
building
four
is
closer
to
north
a
this
is
cass
street
to
the
north,
and
then
there
are
three
roads
that
are
going
to
come
into
this
because
of
the
csx
rail
line.
K
We
are
that
one
access
point
for
public
access
will
be
closer
to
north
a
so
we're
not
going
to
have
there's
not
going
to
be
multiple
crossings
just
from
a
safety
perspective.
K
The
idea
was
taking
and
creating
an
easement
area
that
was
in
an
appropriate
location
to
access
the
rail,
but
not
having
so
many
where
there
you
have
lots
of
people
crossing
over.
Do.
K
K
Q
R
Okay,
all
right-
and
my
last
question
was
chairman:
I
caught
the
I
caught
the
phrase
and
I
don't
know
if
it
was
you
miss
batsell
or
your
planner
or
somebody
else,
and
they
said
market
rate
perfect
place
for
market
rate
college
kids,
etcetera,
which
begs
the
question
of
is:
is
there
any
affordable
housing
or
workforce
housing
integrated
into
any
of
these
buildings,
a
b
c
or
d.
R
Was,
and
and
putting
all
this
together
was
your
client
made
aware
of
the
bonus
and
incentive
opportunities
that
exist
in
our
in
our
code
for
workforce
in
affordable
housing.
K
I
don't
know
I
wasn't
involved
in
the
process
originally,
but
I
do
know
that
we
did
significantly
reduce
our
density
from
what
we
were
originally
proposing
in
working
with
the
community
and
the
neighbor.
The
couple
neighbors
one
of
the
concern
was
number
of
units
parking
waivers,
so
we've
we've
kind
of
worked
with
those
neighbors
to
change
this
plan
significantly
and
part
of
that
was
a
reduction
in
density.
K
G
All
in
favor
all
right
any
polls
motion
granted
mr
manuscal
we're
gonna.
Take
this
stab
at
it,
sir.
O
O
Oh
I'm
sorry,
I
have
a
substitute
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
ordinance,
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
1000
west
fig
street
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
1
from
zoning
district
classification,
ig
industrial
general
to
pd
plant
development,
residential
multi-family,
providing
an
effective
date.
I
believe
that
the
applicant
is
consistent
with
land
use,
objective
9.2,
which
is
intended
to
ensure
that
there's
an
adequate
amount
of
land
plan
for
residential
purposes
to
accommodate
the
projected
population.
O
The
density
proposed
by
the
development
does
not
exceed
the
density
anticipated
under
the
future
land
use
category
and
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
existing
development
pattern
anticipated
through
the
future
land
use
map
and
the
application
is
consistent
with
housing,
objective
objective.
One
point:
three,
that's
it
say
well,
mr
c,
mr.
C
Chairman
you're
recognizing
shelby,
yes
and
mr
madison
does
that
include
the
revision
sheet.
R
R
Okay,
200
and
something
yeah,
something
like
that:
okay,
so.
K
R
Two
things:
let's
see
good
news
or
bad
news.
First,
let's
start
with
the
bad
news
lead
with
the
bad
news.
The
bad
news
is
and
as
as
I
as
I
stated
earlier,
or
as
I
asked
the
question
earlier,
but
I
think
I
knew
the
answer
was
that
there's
no
workforce
and
there's
no
affordable
housing
in
this
project
zero
and
as
mr
larocca
presented
to
us
today,
there's
2500
units
going
up
downtown
without
one
single
unit
being
affordable
or
workforce
housing.
We
are
not
doing
something
right.
R
R
Okay,
okay,
so
that's
my
soapbox
and
that's
the
bad
news.
The
good
news,
ms
patzel
is-
and
you-
and
I
have
talked
about
this
a
long
long
time
ago,
before
this
project
even
came
on
is,
I
do
believe.
One
of
the
appropriate
places
for
density
and
for
large
units
is
downtown
and
in
the
kennedy
corridor-
and
this
is
more
or
less
in
the
candidate
corridor.
R
R
We've
already
closed
the
lease,
but
we
will
talk
later,
but
we
have
to
change
chapter
27
to
get
these
builders
who
come
into
town
to
build
these
big
projects,
we
have
to
figure
out
a
way
to
work
together
with
those
builders
to
do
affordable,
workforce
housing
anyway.
I'll
support
the
motion.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
G
G
To
do
what
we
need
to
do,
I
think,
on
the
24th.
We
got
a
lot
of
growth
management
stuff
coming
and
those
discussions
need
to
happen
then.
But
you
know
it
is
a
good
project.
There's
no
doubt
about
that.
But
you
know
when
you
when
it
goes
through
the
chain,
people
are
going
to
say,
people
are
still
left
out,
this
town's
becoming
a
california,
just
a
rich
person's
place
to
live,
and
that's
just
not
the
case.
Everyone
can
live
here
in
tampa.
O
H
D
D
Closest
public
recreation
facility
is
8th
memorial
park,
which
is
located
along
bayshore
boulevard,
approximately
1700
feet
to
the
northeast
of
the
subject
site
the
host's
transit
stop
is
located
approximately
100
feet
or
150
feet
to
the
north
of
the
subject
site
on
south
hyde
park
avenue.
D
The
subject
site
is
within
a
level
b,
evacuation
zone.
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
the
surrounding
properties,
you'll
see
the
subject
site
it's
outlined
in
this
purple
color.
The
subject
site
is
just
just
a
couple
blocks
west
of
bayshore
boulevard.
This
is
tampa
general
hospital.
D
Here's
the
adopted
future
land
use
map
on
the
subject
site.
It's
currently
recognized
under
the
residential
50
future
land
use
designation.
This
designation
allows
consideration
of
residential
development
up
to
50
12
units,
an
acre,
it's
surrounded
by
that
residential
50
on
all
sides.
D
This
darker
color
here
is
flame
recognized
under
the
residential
83
designation
and
then
approximately
one
block
south
of
the
site
is
our
parcel
is
recognized
under
the
cmu
35
designation,
finding
commission
staff
reviewed
the
application
and
filed
no
adverse
impacts
to
surrounding
neighborhood.
This
portion
of
south
hyde
park
avenue
between
west
platte
street
and
west
de
leon
street
is
primarily
developed
with
non-residential
office
uses
a
single-family
detached
use
is
present.
Adjacent
subject's
site
to
the
north,
and
a
multi-family
use
is
present
to
the
west.
D
Request
proposes
six
multi-family
residential
units
at
an
overall
density
of
26
1
units
per
acre,
which
is
well
under
the
density
anticipated
under
the
residential
50
future
land
use
designation
again
that
designation
allows
up
to
50
qualities
an
acre.
D
The
tampa
comprehensive
plan
encourages
multi-family
developments
to
be
designed
to
include
orientation
the
front
door
towards
the
neighborhood
sidewalk
street.
The
main
entrance
to
the
building
is
oriented
towards
south
high
park,
avenue,
also
a
pathway
that
connects
the
units
to
the
public
sidewalk
on
south
hyde
park
avenue,
which
is
consistent
with
its
policy
direction.
D
D
In
conclusion,
the
request
is
provides
a
sensitive
design
in
his
overall
perspective
to
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
The
request
is
consistent
with
the
development
pattern
under
the
residential
50
future
land
use,
designation
and
based
on
those
considerations.
The
planning
commission
staff
finds
the
request
consistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
That
concludes
my
presentation
available
for
any
questions.
I
I
I
I
The
proposed
project
consists
of
six
dwelling
units
with
a
maximum
height
of
45
feet
to
the
north.
Here
you'll
see
there
will
be
residential
single
family
homes
and
office.
Space
directly
to
the
west.
You'll
have
rm35
with
residential
multi-family
condominiums
to
the
east.
You
have
r01
office
space
and
to
the
south.
You
have
r01
office
space,
also
below
the
proposed
parcel.
I
As
you
see
the
overhead
view
of
the
site
plan,
the
applicant
is
proposing
14
parking
spaces
and
he's
also
required
those
14
parking
spaces.
Vehicular
access
to
the
site
comes
off
south
hyde
park
avenue.
As
you
see,
the
driveway.
I
And,
as
I
went
out
to
the
site,
I
got
as
close
as
I
could
you'll
see
the
vacant
to
the
south.
You'll
see
the
office
space
below.
I
Development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
inconsistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
land
development
code.
Modifications
to
the
site
plan
must
be
completed
by
the
applicant
between
first
and
second
reading,
if
also
approved,
and
also
meet
all
the
regulations
and
needs
from
the
revision
sheet.
B
B
I
G
I
D
Danny
collins,
with
your
planning,
commission
staff,
I've
been
sworn
in.
Our
next
case
is
in
the
south,
tampa
planning
district.
More
specifically,
specifically
the
ballast
point.
Neighborhood,
the
closest
public
recreation
facility
is
skyview
park,
which
is
located
approximately
a
thousand
feet
to
the
southeast
of
the
subject:
site:
coasters
transit.
Stop
is
located
approximately
one
mile
to
the
west
at
the
intersection
of
near
bay
boulevard
in
south
dale
mabery
and
the
site
is
within
a
level
a
evacuation
zone,
and
it
was
also
within
the
cosi
hazard
area.
D
This
is
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site.
The
surrounding
properties
you'll
see
the
subject
site
it's
in
this
purple,
color,
it's
just
south
of
west
bay,
avenue
and
east
of
south
mcdill
avenue.
There
is
a
non-residential
use
to
the
northwest
of
the
subject.
Sites
to
the
south,
east
and
south,
or
I'm
sorry,
north,
east
and
south
are
our
residential
uses.
D
A
D
D
D
D
The
proposed
rs50
zoning
disk
will
will
create
additional
housing
opportunities,
approximate
transit
and
employment
opportunities
located
along
south
dell
or
south
macdill
subject.
Site
is
within
the
cosa
hazard
area.
Applicants
should
ensure
that
there
will
be
no
negative
impacts
on
hurricane
evacuation
times.
Routes
and
shelter
demands
for
residents
of
the
proposed
development
and
to
mitigate
any
negative
impacts
that
may
affect
residents
in
the
future
and
as
per
coastal
management
policy.
1.2.2,
in
conclusion,
this
rezoning
will
provide
compatible
development
and
contribute
to
the
academic
health
of
the
city.
D
Furthermore,
the
request
is
consistent
with
the
development
pattern
anticipated
under
the
residential
10
designation.
Based
on
these
considerations,
the
planning
commission
staff
finds
a
request
consistent
with
the
city
of
conference
of
plan.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Any.
R
Danny
kind
of
a
incidental
question,
but
you
you
describe
this
as
the
ballast
point
area
but
and
if
in
in
fact
it's
south
of
inner
bay,
how?
How
far
do
you
guys
consider
ballast
point.
D
I'm
sorry
can
you,
can
you
hear
me
better,
okay,
well,
there's
a
there's,
a
gis
map
on
the
city
of
tampa's
webpage
and
that's
where
we
pull
our
neighborhood
information
from.
R
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
R
Thank
you,
mr
hussein.
Yes,
sir,
two
things,
you
said
four
dwelling
units.
If
you
go
go
back
to
your
plat
map,
I
thought
it
looked
like
350
foot
lots.
I
So
the
rx-50
density
allows
for
a
maximum
of
well
one
dwelling
unit
per
5
000
square
feet
so,
based
on
the
approximate
law
size
of
24
000
square
feet,
which
is
the
equivalent
you
could
do.
Four
dwelling
units.
R
I
Understood
with
a
square
footage,
sir,
they
can
do
the
four
four
dueling
units
here.
F
Thank
you
for
the
record
kate
wells
chief
assistant
city
attorney.
I
had
reached
out
to
annie
barnes,
who
had
prepared
the
initial
report,
because
there
did
appear
to
be
a
discrepancy
between
the
information,
the
city
staff
report
and
the
planning
commission
and
her
response
to
me
by
email
dated
february
8th
of
this
year.
F
F
R
R
R
D
D
I
I
have
the
overall
overhead
flat.
I
don't
have
a
no
aerial
footage.
I
can
pull
it
up
on
on
the
property
appraiser.
If
you
wish
me
to
okay.
R
R
And
I'll
ask
my
question:
while
you're
getting
there
there's
a
very
large
area,
that's
rs60.
A
R
Yeah,
that's
it
so
can
you
can
you
blow
that
up
the
upper
part
yeah
keep
going
keep
going
until
we
can
see
it
better
all
right
now,
let's
try
and
center
that
if
you
can
okay.
Thank
you
again,
council.
I
apologize
so
looking
at
that.
That's
the
subject:
property
in
the
red
to
the
I
guess
to
the
north
is
bay.
R
R
So
my
question
is:
is
why
isn't
this
spot
zoning
if
we
designate
that
neighborhood
as
being
an
rs60,
which
it
is
some
some
council
designated
that
as
rs-60
many
many
years
ago,
and
it's
probably
it
looks
like
it's
probably
at
least
50
to
100
homes
that
are
rs-60
all
of
a
sudden?
Are
we
you
know,
would
we
would
we
allow
a
spot
a
spot
zoning
like
that.
I
It's
a
great
question
based
on
the
conforming
map.
As
in
the
presentation
was
you
had
a
majority,
I
believe
it
was
57
in
the
studied
area
which
were
59.99
feet
or
less
so
the
majority
was
for
under
60
feet.
R
O
I
And
overall,
if
you
look
to
the
north,
you'll
have
rs50.
If
you
look
to
the
west,
you'll
have
also
rs50.
So
I
understand
to
the
east:
there
is
a
majority
rs60,
but
overall
there's
rs50
around
the
designated
site.
N
Along
with
the
same
question,
mr
dingfelder,
that
was
changed
some
period
time
ago.
That
used
to
be
only
250.
Am
I
correct
with
300
feet
at
one
time
and
now
the
sun?
We
went
to
1350
feet,
which
is
a
quarter
mile,
so
it
works
both
ways
it
could
work
for
or
against.
That's
that's
what
the
problem
comes
in,
and
I've
heard
us
discuss
this
and-
and
we
say
well,
look
it
ain't.
N
R
R
Some
council
plopped
an
rs50
on
there,
and
if
we
approve
this
one
there's
going
to
be
another
one
and
then
pretty
soon
it
would
be
more
and
more
and
more
so,
what's
the
point
of
even
having
that
neighborhood
be
rs60,
I
don't
really
understand
anyway.
That's
sort
of
a
big
picture
question
that
we
can
get
into
another
day,
but
thank
you,
mr
hussein.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
G
A
G
We'll
close,
mr
madison
with
sea
trough,
wait.
R
G
Me
just
be
clear:
I
can't
see
the
second
floor
from
ct
tv.
Mr
eileen,
is
there
anyone
on
the
second
floor
to
speak
on
item
number,
seven.
G
R
H
G
I
Technical
issues,
can
you
repeat
the
question,
sir.
G
One
second
say
mr
carlson
recognized
all
right
saying:
go
ahead.
C
The
question
mr
hussein
is
with
the
applicant
not
being
present
when
would
be
the
appropriate
date
to
continue
this
till
and
how
will
the
applicant
be
contacted.
I
That's
a
great
question:
yes,
sir,
if
you
would
like
to
continue
this
case,
we're
going
to
continue
to
414
22
at
501
pm,
or
also
at
5
12
20
22
at
501
pm.
We
have
10
rezonings
on
each
night
and
we
have
three
continuances.
If
you
want,
if
you
choose
to.
M
We've
spent
a
lot
of
time
talking
about
how
continuances
take
up
even
more
time,
and
it's
not
fair
to
the
new
applicants
if
they
can't
find
slots.
I
just
wonder:
is
there
any
rule
about
requiring
an
applicant
to
be
here,
and
is
it
possible
to
ask
about
the
applicant
in
advance?
M
If,
if
our
policy
is
to
continue,
then
it
seems
like
we
should
do
that
before
we
hear
it,
but
if
I
is
there
any
is
there
any
rule
that
would
would
disqualify
an
application
or-
or
I
I
don't
know
how
you
would
typically
handle
this?
Is
there
any
other
way
besides
continuing
to
handle
this.
C
M
Could
we
just
as
part
of
our
process,
then
just
make
sure
the
applicant
is
present
before
we
start
on
these?
Just
just
so,
we
don't
go
late
in
the
night
and
have
to
continue
all
of
them.
C
M
I
don't
remember
this
happening
before,
but
we
just
spent
what
20
minutes
or
something
on
this
and
and
it
was
so
what's
the
rule.
If
the
applicant
is
not
present,
we
can't
hear
it,
but
is
there?
Is
there
any
other
solution?
Besides
not
besides,
you
can
continue
yeah.
C
M
We
miss
wells.
Could
we
make
a
motion
to
just
send
it
back
to
staff
and
and
have
staff
work
with
the
applicant
to
to
to
request
a
new
date
instead
of
us
putting
it
on
our
schedule?.
F
C
C
So
I
agree
with
as
well
as
that.
I
would
recommend
council,
I
believe
if
council
is
so
inclined
april,
14th
2022
is
that
correct?
Mr
hussein,
at
501.
I
Pm,
yes,
sir,
that's
an
available
date.
I
C
Mr
shelby
yeah
and
with
the
note
to
have
the
staff
to
be
in
contact
with
the
applicant
in
advance
of
that
so.
H
P
G
Okay,
we're
in
recess,
madam
clerk
is
giving
me
that
signal.
So
we
stand
in
recess
for
about
five
minutes.
C
C
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
G
H
H
B
B
My
name
is
michael
horner,
14,
502,
northfield
neighboring,
highway,
tampa
representing
the
developer
and
owner
brent
bulge,
who
is
present.
Also
tonight
with
me,
is
david
pukeson,
our
project
engineer
and
also
alex
andriakos
with
design
styles
architecture.
We'll
make
a
few
brief
comments
on
an
exhibit.
After
my
comments,
all.
H
B
All
right,
council
again,
thank
you.
I
am
michael
horner
for
the
record
fourteen
five
with
two
dale
mayberry
highway
tampa
three
three
six
one
eight
represent
the
applicant
on
this
matter.
I'll
try
to
be
brief.
I
know
you
have
a
long
agenda.
This
case
is
at
330
south
hyde
park
avenue.
We
have
worked
diligently
with
staff
over
the
past.
I
want
to
say
seven.
Eight
months
we
filed
a
plan
in
the
fall
quite
honestly
council
that
the
arc
had
some
concerns
with
and
staff
they
identified
concerns
on
the
number
of
units
and
some
open
space.
B
B
B
B
R
Can
you
swap
out
the
we
love
seeing
your
face,
but
but
you're
bigger
than
the
thing?
Oh.
R
B
B
B
We
don't
want
to
touch
that,
so
we
have
a
significant
setback
buffer
around
that
tree.
You
can
see.
The
setback
to
the
east
has
been
increased
before
to
now
10
feet,
and
then
it
widens
additionally
to
28
feet
to
save
that
tree
and
give
it
a
protective
radius
again
we're
saving
the
other
two
oak
trees
on
the
site
and
we're
planting
crate,
myrtles
meeting
the
tree
requirements,
both
north
and
south
of
this
structure.
B
B
We
have
worked
with
staff
to
minimize
as
many
waves
as
possible.
The
only
waiver
that
we
cannot
escape,
as
they
noticed
noted,
is
the
setback
buffer.
That
buffer
is
required
because
we
are
introducing
residential
into
an
office
area.
All
the
zoning
is
r01
and
typically
you
would
invert
that
and
you
would
protect
residential
from
office
in
this
case,
because
we're
surrounded
by
r01
zoning
and
we're
proposing
residential.
B
We
have
to
provide
a
15-foot
buffer,
so
we
have
asked
for
that
buffer
to
be
reduced.
We
have
shown
that
on
the
plan
the
arc
approved
that
the
only
difference
is
the
arc
recommended
that
we
not
do
a
vinyl
or
wood
fence.
They
ask
for
six
foot
high
masonry
wall
on
the
north,
east
and
south
sides,
with
the
exception
of
the
area
that
wraps
around
that
grand
tree
the
northeast,
where
a
wood
fence
will
be
permitted.
Six
foot
hundred
percent.
Okay,
I'm
going
to
stop
there
again.
B
B
A
M
We
go
okay,
it
said
all
right,
muted
by
organizer
there
good
evening
council,
my
name
is
alexandrakos
design,
styles
architecture.
Just
this
graphic,
like
michael
said,
is
showing
the
block
surrounding
the
site.
Subject:
site
is
in
blue,
with
the
star
here
north
is
to
the
left.
What
I'm
showing
here
on
this
graphic
is
a
makeup
of
the
surrounding
area.
M
The
color
coding
indicates
the
type
of
use,
so
in
red
we
have
commercial
in
yellow,
we
have
multi
family
buildings
and
then
in
orange
we
have
a
single
family
building.
Also,
what's
indicated
on
this
graphic
is
the
paved
and
unpaved
areas.
So,
as
you'll
notice,
there
is
a
large
portion
of
this
area
that
is
paved
either
parking
or.
M
Mostly
mostly
parking
for
these
commercial
lots,
you'll
see
the
site
just
around
the
site
is
where
most
of
the
green
space
exists
and
and
as
you
can
see,
the
setbacks
with
the
subject.
Property
are
consistent
with
the
rhythm
of
the
neighboring
properties
and,
if
I
just
jump
back
to
this
graphic,
real
quick.
M
To
reiterate
what
michael
said,
this
is
showing
the
15-foot
setback
with
landscaping
and
then
the
you
know
distances
from
the
adjacent
properties
and,
as
he
mentioned
also,
it
was
recommended
by
the
arc
that
a
six
foot
wall
be
constructed
around.
So
that
concludes
my
portion
of
the
presentation.
B
Thank
you,
alex
council
members.
Again,
we
appreciate
staff
support.
I
think
this
revised
plan
checks
all
the
boxes.
We
hope
you
agree.
We've
had
a
number
of
residents
contact
us
then,
upon
hearing
we're
actually
proposing
residential,
they
were
most
pleased.
This
is
a
low
traffic
generator.
We
actually
have
two
condo
towers
that
are
quite
large
and
tall.
Our
legal
notices
extended
to
almost
350
notices.
I
want
to
state
and
again
I
don't
believe
we
have
any
opposition
or
objection
so
I'll
close
there.
You
have
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank
you.
Any
question.
R
So
it's
a
pd,
do
you
have
any
renderings
of
of
what
this
or
approximately
what
this
might
look
like
when
it's
done
number
one
number,
two,
mr
horner,
so
you
got
a
garage
underneath
and
then
you've
got
six
units
above
on
two
floors.
Is
it
three
units
per
floor
or
are
they
are
they
walk?
Ups,
I'm
just
more
curious
than
anything.
How?
How
does
this
building
work.
B
Sure
alex
you
want
to
show
the
floor
plan,
and
that
is
correct.
These
are
four
bedroom
units
and
we
do
have
a
massing
form
elevation.
We
filed
very
detailed
elevations
initially
now
the
arc
wants
to
further
review
those
during
the
certificate
of
appropriateness
so
to
the
extent
those
are
still
applicable,
we
can
certainly
show
them
alex,
go
ahead
and
discuss
the
floor
plan.
The
unit
layout,
please.
M
Yes,
so
I
will
back
up
here
to
the
ground
floor
once
again
showing
the
entry
here
on
the
west
side
of
the
building
showing
the
two
stair
towers.
This
was
where
the
elevator
core
is,
and
then,
as
michael
mentioned
earlier,
an
office
that
was
initially
included
on
the
original
plan
has
been
replaced
with
a
significantly
smaller
room,
which
is
just
the
mail
room
bike
storage
tree
back
here,
and
there
would
be
some
seating,
dumpster
enclosure
there.
M
M
So
here
here's
a
an
elevation
showing
comparison
to
the
adjacent
properties
and
then
oh
there
we
go
and
then
this
is
a
conceptual
rendering,
showing
not
necessarily
architectural
style
but
massing
and
overall
general
placement
of
openings
and
the
entry
into
the
building
for
parking.
And
then
you
know
landscaping
and
addressing
street
streetscape.
B
G
A
B
He's
with
us
team
does
not
need
to
speak.
F
G
All
right,
we
don't
have
them
on
our
monitors
on
the
dies
there.
He
is
swear.
O
Him
in
good
evening,
council
ron
gila
I'm
with
historic
preservation.
You
cannot
see
me,
we
can
see
you,
sir.
A
O
Thank
you
just
to
bring
you
current.
This
preliminary
case
came
forward
on
october,
4th
2021
and
the
arc
reviewed
it
and
recommended
denial
of
the
initial
plan
for
the
reason
that
the
site
coverage,
the
front
side
and
rear
setbacks
and
green
space
were
not
consistent
with
a
hyper
design
guidelines
and
that
motion
for
denial
was
four
to
zero.
O
So,
as
mr
horner
stated,
the
arc
reviewed
this
amended
rezoning
recommendation
on
february
7
2000,
with
an
approval
recommendation
to
move
forward.
There
were
two
conditions
attached
to
that:
approval
that
the
north,
the
south
and
the
east
boundary
lines
have
a
wall
around
it.
O
A
six
foot
high
wall,
with
the
exception
within
the
protective
radius
of
the
grand
tree
and
then
at
a
note,
we
added
to
the
site
plan
to
authorize
the
architectural
review
commission
the
ability
to
adjust
setbacks
on
all
elevations
for
a
distance
up
to
five
foot,
to
enable
the
development
of
the
building
elements
that
characterize
the
high
park,
historic
district
and
that
will
be
facilitated
during
the
arc
process
for
the
certificate
of
appropriateness,
and
that
was
approved
recommendation
to
move
forward
four
to
zero.
G
All
right
who
the
clothes
miss
maniscalco
say
about
mr
citro,
all
in
favor
any
opposed
motion
granted.
Mr
carlson
take
a
step
back,
sir.
A
M
The
density
proposed
by
the
development
does
not
exceed
the
density,
anticipate
under
the
future
land
use
category
and
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
existing
development.
The
application
is
consistent
with
housing,
objective
1.3,
which
ensures
that
adequate
amount
of
housing
is
available
to
meet
the
needs,
preferences
and
financial
capabilities
of
tampa's
households
now
and
in
the
future.
C
D
N
H
I
Thank
you
so
much.
His
name
is
saying
development
coordination
agenda
item
number
four
case:
rec
2020
this
for
the
property
at
3335
north
22nd
street,
for
a
proposal
resulting
from
rm
24
residential
multifamily
to
cg
commercial
general
I'll,
pass
it
along
to
danny
collins
with
planning
commission
is
that
danny
collins,
yeah.
D
This
is
danny
collins
with
your
planet,
commission
staff.
I've
been
sworn
in.
Our
next
case
is
in
the
central
temple
planning
district.
More
specifically
in
the
north
eboor
neighborhood
subject.
Site
is
within
east
tampa
urban
village
the
site
is
within
one
mile
of
both
alfred
barnes
and
cascade
park,
and
the
subject
side
is
not
within
an
evacuation
zone.
D
Here
is
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject.
Site
surrounding
properties
you'll
see
the
subject
site
is
at
the
northeast
corner
of
north
22nd
street
and
east
26th
avenue
it's
outlined
in
this
purple.
Color
you'll
see
that
there
is
residential
useless
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site
and
then
there
are
some
non-residential
uses
found
along
this
portion
of
north
22nd
street.
D
Here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
The
subject
site
is
currently
recognized
under
the
cmu
35
future
land
use
designation
directly
to
the
north
is
another
mixed-use
land
use
categories.
The
cc-35
to
the
east
is
residential.
Cloning
to
the
south
is
cmu
35
and
then
to
the
west.
On
the
west
side
of
north
22nd
is
land
recognized
under
the
residential
35
destinations.
D
Subject:
site
is
within
the
cmu
35
designation,
which
allows
for
the
consideration
of
cg
commercial
general
uses,
planning.
Commission
staff
reviewed
the
surrounding
area
and
requests
would
allow
for
development
that
would
be
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
surrounding
area
and
would
not
have
an
adverse
impact
on
the
north
keyboard
neighborhood.
The
quest
is
consistent
with
policy
direction.
The
comprehensive
plan,
which
promotes
a
range
of
uses
within
proxy
to
each
other,
the
applicant
should
be
aware
that
any
future
developments
shall
be
appropriately
buffered
from
the
residential
uses
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site.
D
Overall,
the
request
is
within
the
character
of
the
surrounding
area,
consistent
with
a
long-range
development
pattern
anticipated
under
the
cmu
35
future
landings
designation.
Based
on
those
considerations,
the
planning
commission
staff
finds
the
request
consistent
with
the
invention,
2040
tampa
comprehensive
plans.
This
concludes
my
presentation,
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Any.
I
I
I
The
applicant
has
decided
to
move
forward
with
the
original
euclidean
request
at
this
time.
Now,
this
being
a
continued
case,
I'll
leave
it
to
you.
Gentlemen,
if
you
would
like
me
to
continue
my
presentation,
or
would
you
like
to
leave
to
the
applicant
to
speak
on
his
project.
G
I
No,
no,
sir,
this
being
a
continued
case
that
wants
to
move.
You
want
me
to
repeat
for
the
record.
Well,
you
said
it
was
the
25th.
I
I
I
You
see
an
overhead
boundary
survey
of
the
parcel
with
the
residents
in
the
northern
portion.
Well,
at
nine,
we.
R
I
I
Okay,
can
you
please
share
my
screen,
sir?.
A
Then
I
sent
you
the
request,
I'll
be
sending
it
again.
B
R
C
I
See
the
survey?
Yes,
sir.
Yes,
wonderful,
thanks!
So
much
all
right
overhead
view
of
the
survey
here
for
about
nine
8
watt,
7
and
lot
6.
I
I
I
The
subject
property
is
located:
southeast
of
the
intersection
of
east
26th
avenue
and
north
22nd
street
property
to
the
northern
subject
site
and
across
east
26th
avenue
is
zoned
ci
commercial,
intensive
and
developed
with
retail
sales
properties
located
to
the
east
and
across
homes.
Street
is
known.
Rm16,
residential,
multi-family
and
developed
with
residential
single-family
detached
uses
property
to
the
south
of
the
parcel
is
known
rm24,
and
this
is
developed
with
residential
single-family
detached
uses
and
property
to
the
west
of
the
subject.
I
Parcel
is
zone
pda,
plan
development,
alternative
and
developed
with
retail
sales
out
here.
The
properly
developed
west
is
also
pda
and
developed
with
residential
single-family
and
multi-family
uses.
I
Sir,
that's
an
greenery
and
we'll
say
a
lake,
yes,
sir,
or
palm
beach.
I
The
site
itself,
so
it'll
kind
of
show
a
better
picture
of
the
trees
and
greenery
in
there.
G
My
eyes
are
bad.
Today,
it's
okay,
I'm
looking
at
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
that
area
right
there
we're
at
26
it's
22nd
street.
I
know
that's
that's
the
retention
pond.
The
tension
pond
is
that
is
that
the
old
gas
station
or
the
old
mechanic
shop
we're
talking
about
yep,
okay,
right,
all
right,
okay,.
G
R
Chairman
is
this:
the
subject
parcel
seems
long
long.
Does
it
include
that
grassy
area
that
that
that's
on
that
picture
right
there.
I
It's
four,
I
believe
it's
a
four
watts,
as
I
showed
up.
R
I
Of
course,
subject:
property
facing
northeast
on
north
22nd
street
as
you
see
the
subject
property
facing
southeast
on
north
22nd
street.
I
Now
the
retail
use
the
retail
use
northeast
of
the
east
22nd
avenue
and
north
22nd
avenue
correct
right
north.
You
have
your
beauty
supply
your
grocery
stores,
so
on
and
the
recommendation.
Development
review
and
compliance
staff
have
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
it
overall
consistent
with
the
ceo
tampa
land
development
code.
For
any
questions,
if
needed,.
B
Mr
chairman
and
council
members,
thank
you.
I'm
michael
corner,
14
502,
north
dale,
mary
highway,
tampa
33618
representing
mr
tony
janu,
the
applicant
and
the
owner
of
this
request.
Mr
goods,
you
have
a
good
memory.
This
is
exactly
that
old
convenience
store
gas
station
car
repair
facility
that
existed
since
the
70s,
the
early
70s.
B
B
Can
I
continue?
Yes,
sir,
and
unfortunately,
this
site
has
now
been
declared
on
the
southern
portion
and
epa
superfund
sites.
My
client
purchased
this
site,
hoping
for
his
dream
to
develop
this
property
as
a
commercial
center
with
his
butterfly
pharmacy,
which
exists
just
two
blocks
south
from
here
on
north
22nd
street,
where
he
is
leasing.
His
dream
is
to
have
his
own
parcel
and
his
own
butterfly
pharmacy
on
his
own
property.
B
Unfortunately,
that
dream
fell
to
the
wayside
and
is
notified
that
this
is
the
has
been
deemed
to
be
a
superfund
site.
There
is
a
groundwater
monitoring
well
on
the
northern
portion,
so
that
green
strip
that
you
see
most
of
that
southern
portion
is
an
epa
superfund
site.
It
is
not
a
highly
contaminated
site
note
for
the
record
they're,
estimating
the
funding
levels
that
it
could
be
10
to
15
years.
B
A
G
B
B
If
you
can
go
back
to
the
aerial
david,
we'll
try
to
elevate
this
as
large
as
possible,
all
right
so
council!
This
is
the
site.
You
can
see
this
intersection.
We
are
the
southeast
corner.
This
is
about
a
half
acre
site
about
24
000
square
feet.
Just
over
half
acre
that
northern
impervious
surface
area
and
the
one
structure
is
the
existing
gas
station
that
closed
in
the
70s
tanks
removed.
It
then
converted
to
a
repair
facility
in
the
80s
and
then
it
closed
recently.
B
My
client
is
now
under
zoning
violation,
because
that
was
established
back
in
rm
24
code
enforcement
has
been
most
gracious
working
with
us,
realizing
that
now
we
have
a
superfund
site.
Our
options
are
limited
and
now,
instead
of
redeveloping
this
entire
half-acre
site
for
a
center,
it's
going
to
have
to
be
an
adaptive
reuse
plan
to
accommodate
mr
jannu's
proposed
pharmacy
next
slide.
Please.
B
So
this
was
the
initial
strip
center
that
he
was
going
to
propose
for
retail
22nd
street
is
to
the
west.
26Th
avenue
is
across
the
northern
side.
If
you
can
move
that
screen
further
south,
that
center
was
expanded
to
the
entire
half-acre
tract,
and
it
would
have
been
at
a
far
about
.25
parking
in
the
front,
some
parking
in
the
eastern
side
and
access
per
staff.
That
was
the
proposed
pd
plan.
B
This
is
from
the
department
of
health
rehabilitative
services.
This
shows
the
epicenter.
If
you
will
of
that
epa
contamination
site
again.
The
good
news
is
there
is
very
little
contamination,
but
it's
enough
that
they
have
to
formally
trigger
their
cleanup
and,
of
course,
this
is
a
federally
funded
site.
Those
funds
are
limited.
So
if
my
client
wanted
to
accelerate
development,
you
would
have
to
undertake
the
entire
contamination
process.
B
So
what
have
we
done?
Council?
We
have
decided,
and
I
went
back
and
reviewed
the
transcripts.
I
reviewed
the
the
video
of
the
meeting
back
in
2020.
We
took
a
hiatus
to
get
a
handle
on
the
superfund
site
and
we
realized
there
was
opposition
on
the
south
side.
I
believe
that
is
dr
white
historical
structure,
residence.
It
is
beautiful.
B
B
We
will
reinstate
that
legal
description
between
first
and
second
reading,
leaving
only
that
northern
structure
and
northern
parcel
that
would
be
zoned
cg
so
that
my
client
can
get
out
of
zoning
violation
and
try
to
offer
an
adaptive
reuse
of
this
structure,
which
is
approximately
2
800
square
feet.
We.
S
B
Ci
zoning
directly
to
the
north
and,
of
course,
lee
davis
center
to
my
client,
has
a
strong
relationship
with
to
the
northwest,
but
we
don't
see
any
reason
to
include
that
south
portion.
He
cannot
develop
it.
This
commercial,
his
dreams
for
the
retail
center
have
gone
away,
and
this
provides
almost
foot
buffer
that
will
never
change
to
the
white
residence
historical
structure
to
the
south
next
slide.
Please.
B
This
would
be
the
floor
plan
that
would
just
reuse
the
existing
structure.
Again
it
it
offers
an
adaptive
reuse.
We
are
very
limited.
We
only
have
room
for
approximately
nine.
R
Yeah
just
point
of
order,
mr
horner,
as
you
know,
the
the
cg
is
the
cg.
It's
euclidean
zoning.
I
don't
have
to
tell
you,
you
can
show
us
floor
plans
all
day
long,
but
but
they're
not
binding
and
and
we
appreciate
it
and
I
believe
you
and
your
client
completely,
but
it's
kind
of
irrelevant
to
the
to
the
proceeding.
I
am
thrilled.
I
remember
this
case
and
I
know
miss
andrea
white
very
well,
and
I
remember
her
objections
on
behalf
of
her
family
house
and
and
I'm
thrilled
that
you're.
R
B
Right,
if
I
could
just
finish
my
thought,
mr
dean
felder
sure
I
only
know
that
parking
ratio
only
allows
for
nine
spaces,
so
he
cannot
do
retail.
He
cannot
do
furniture.
He
certainly
can't
do
any
bars
or
clubs
that
falls
in
your
jurisdiction.
He
has
cleaned
up
this
site.
He
has
worked
hard
with
this
neighborhood
he
has
given
to
this
community.
B
B
G
Any
questions
for
mr
horn.
M
M
Yes,
sir,
hey
mr
horner
mentioned
the
superfund
site
and
contamination
and
all
those
words
can
can
we
just
say
for
the
record,
we're
only
looking
at
the
land
use
tonight,
we're
not
making
any
determination
about
the
health
and
safety
of
the
of
the
spot
correct,
and
we
can.
We
can't
use
that
information,
probably
as
a
as
a
reason
to
accept
or
deny.
A
A
Of
that
devil,
thank
you
and
good
evening,
gentlemen.
I
have
heard
everything
and
I'll
make
it
as
brief
as
possible.
My
objections
still
stand
and
the
fact
that
these
conversations
are
thoughts
of
what
mr
horner
is
putting
into.
A
A
The
count
the
contamination
will
affect
any
wells
in
that
area
that
all
didn't
just
stay
in
that
one
spot
and
I
have
been,
and
others
have
complained
about
it
in
prior
years.
So
I
don't
understand
where
the
confusion
comes
in
with
this
is
a
contaminated
piece
of
property
going
east,
north,
south
and
west
the
lead
paint.
A
G
A
A
Chair
there's
two
registered
speakers.
However,
julius
green
did
not
sign
up
to
speak
tonight,
although
he
was
registered
so
we're
going
to
go
to
dr
theophilus
sai
theophilus
side.
If
you're
on
the
line,
please
unmute
yourself
and
you
have
three
minutes
to
speak.
G
Yeah
hi
good
evening,
council,
one
second
one.
Second,
sir,
we
can't
see,
we
can't
see
you.
B
Our
client,
tony
geneve,
is
also
attending
he'd
like
to
make
just
a
brief
comment.
Please.
G
All
right
so
well,
race
people
go
back
to
okay.
Have
you
sworn
in
sir.
P
H
A
Mr
chairman,
I
have
mr
green
julius
green,
who
also
was
registered.
He
didn't
have
a
computer
he's
here
with
me.
I
don't
know
if
you
will
permit
to
testify,
but
again,
like
mr
horner
said
my
name
is
tony
genoa,
I'm
a
pharmacist,
my
children
january,
I
go
by
tony
and,
as
mr
horner
said,
you
know
I'm
a
pharmacist,
we've
been
there
and
I
had
a
very
good
presentation
last
time
with
all
of
you
there.
You
know
mr
dingfelder,
you,
mr
vera.
A
Mr
chairman,
you
were
not
there
last
time
when
we
had
this
whole
conversation,
but,
like
mr
harness
said,
you
know,
we
absolutely
have
no
option
to
develop.
B
A
Complete
space,
and
the
only
thing
that
I
am
trying
to
do
is
move
across
the
street
from
lee
davis
so
that
I
can
help
more
people
and
I'm
the
preferred
pharmacy
for
co-behavioral
health,
and
I
have
about
1200
residents
within
33605,
like
within
the
immediate
neighborhood
that
I'm
that
are
using
my
services
at
the
pharmacy,
and
I
have
a
lot
of
support
and
we
are
renting
this
building,
which
is
again
having
a
lot
of
issues.
It's
an
old
building.
A
The
roof
you
know
is
is
completely
like
this
building
has
to
be
where
I'm
renting
right
now
is
not
in
a
very
good
stage.
So
that
is
one
of
the
reasons
why
I
am
looking
to.
You
know,
move
to
the
other
property
so
that
I
can
be.
You
know
in
a
bigger
spot,
more
parking
and
be
more
useful
for
the
neighborhood
than
anything
else.
A
Thank
you
for
the
time
opportunity,
chair
and
chairman
and
all
the
council
members.
Thank
you,
sir.
G
All
right,
I
see
you
have,
mr
mr,
the
lapis,
the
opposite
is
on
screen.
You
want
to
swear
them
in
mental
clerk.
Please.
A
Yes
again,
my
name
is
dr
seafonsai,
I'm
an
internist
and
I
have
my
own
practice
just
located
at
3105
north
22nd
street.
So
it's
about
a
three
minute,
walk
from
the
site
that
we
are
discussing.
I
currently
service
seniors
that
live
in
the
bermond
heights
area.
A
The
the
key
point-
the
importance
of
butterfly
pharmacy
to
to
us
as
a
clinic
and
to
the
community,
is
that
most
of
our
patients
are
seniors,
who
either
don't
drive
or
will
find
it
difficult
to
drive
to
walk
or
the
cvss
in
the
area,
while
a
lot
of
them
can
just
walk
across
the
street
from
vermont
heights
and
go
to
butterfly
pharmacies
so,
barring
any
unforeseen
circumstances.
A
If
we
were
to
lose
a
fly
farmer,
it
would
create
extreme
hardship
for
a
lot
of
our
patients.
So
I
I
I
probably
support
tony
jones
application
to
move
his
farmers
and
I
think
we
contribute
to
his
need
to
move
the
pharmacy,
because
the
clinic
has
grown
quite
a
bit
over
the
past
three
years
where
and
most
of
our
business
is
going
to
him.
So
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
for
the
seniors
to
maintain
the
pharmacy
locally.
G
G
A
I
knew
dr
andrew
and
visited
with
him
while
he
was
still
practicing,
and
that
was
one
of
the
reasons
I
purchased
the
building
from
dr
campbell,
who,
who
was
practicing
there
up
until
three
and
a
half
years
ago.
All.
G
A
Dear
council,
one
of
the
things
that
miss
white
was
mentioning
about
the
tanks
being
in
the
ground
that
I
have
documented
proof
that
the
tanks
were
removed
from
the
ground
from
in
the
80s.
And
that
is
one
of
the
reasons
why
the
why
the
contamination
is
there
like
when
the
contamination.
That
is
why
the
gas
station
was
shut
down
because
of
the
tanks
and
the
tanks
were
actually
removed
from
the
ground
in
the
80s,
and
there
is
documented
proof
for
it.
A
Mr
green,
who
is
the
the
the
previous
owner,
would
like
to.
If
you
permit,
I
mean
he
would
like
to
talk.
G
H
A
Well,
I'm
julius
green,
I'm,
the
former
owner
of
3335
north
22nd.
I
actually
been
working
there
for
over
30
years
and
I
actually
seen
the
tanks
tucking
out
of
that
ground.
If
you
go
there
now,
you
can
see
where
they
put
the
brand
new
cement
there
and
dug
them
tanks
up,
but
my
understanding
as
a
21
year
old
that
the
contaminated
dirt,
what
was
in
the
ground
was
hauled
off
and
replaced
by
fresh
dirt.
I
mean
25
years
later
you
say
it's
contaminated.
A
I
don't
understand
that,
but
miss
white
we've
been
neighbors
since
I
was
1920
and
maybe
saw
her
six
times
and
the
whole
time
about
her
husband.
We
had
a
great
relationship
but
far
as
you're
right.
A
A
I
mean
it's
a
thing
where
I
personally
even
now,
keep
that
property
clean.
That's
what
I
do!
That's
what
I
enjoy,
but
with
that
said,
I
think
tony
he's
a
great
guy.
As
far
as
I'm
concerned
he
religious
guy.
He
don't
want
to
hurt
anybody,
definitely
don't
want
to
give
miss
white
any
trouble
or
lose
any
value
to
her
property,
but.
A
It
was
great
against
sweaty
guys
he
came
over.
He
had
a
good
time,
we
had
no
problem
and
he
didn't
have
a
problem.
Neither
one
said
anything
up
to
this
point.
Where
he's
purchased
this
and
like
I
said
he
he
likes
to
have
his
own
place,
I
gave
him
opportunity
to
buy
them.
Yeah
I
mean
many
people
want
five,
please.
I
chose
tony
good
guy
good
friend
and
great.
R
I
just
have
a
comment
before
we
close.
Mr
harney's
got
work
on
his
witness
prep.
R
R
If,
if
they
didn't
get
rezoning,
the
entire
property
would
remain
at
the
rm24,
which
means
that
potentially
you
know
they
could
build
apartments.
Or
what
have
you?
You
know
up
up
on
top
of
that,
those
those
alleged
gas
tanks,
whether
or
not
they're
there
or
not?
We
don't
know
and
legal-
has
told
us-
it's
not
really
relevant
to
our
decision,
but
the
bottom
line
is:
is
a
commercial
general
up
there
on
the
north
end
doesn't
seem
to
be
intrusive
because
that's
been
the
use,
that's
been
the
use.
R
That
seems
like
it's
been
there
for
a
long
long
time
so
anyway,
but
ms
white,
I
think
we
we've
got
a
greatly
improved
situation
than
where
we
were
before
so
instead
of
allowing
the
commercial
general
to
intrude
down
toward
your
house,
they've
split
the
parcel
in
half
and
they're
only
going
to
do
the
cg
on
the
top
half
leave
the
bottom
half
alone.
R
So
with
that,
I'm
I'm
comfortable.
B
B
To
indicate
that
I
did
try
numerous
times
to
reach
out
to
miss
white's,
I
I
knew
she
objected
prior.
My
client
tried
to
reach
her
was
not
successful.
I
tried
to
reach
her
was
not
successful.
I
ended
up
sending
her
a
letter
with
graphics
and
said.
Please
call
me
we
want
to
talk
to
you
about
this,
so
that
there's
no
confusion
and
I
did
not
hear
from
her
so
I'm
sorry
that
communication
broke
down.
You
know
me.
B
I
reach
out
to
all
the
neighbors
there's
any
issue,
we're
the
first
ones
to
show
up
and
address
issues,
so
the
tanks
have
been
removed.
This
gives
miss
white,
an
incredible
buffer,
no
development.
We
will
amend
that
legal
description
between
first
and
second,
I
met
mr
janu
and
I
realized
this
gentleman
is
a
giver,
he's
not
a
taker
and
what
he
has
done
for
this
community.
I
won't
go
into
those
details.
Is
phenomenal?
That's
one
of
the
reasons
I
took
this
case.
Thank
you
very
much.
Council.
N
N
Yes,
you
are
correct,
mr
chair.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
move
an
ordinance
file
number
rec,
2020
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
ordinance
result
of
the
property
in
general
vicinity
of
3335
north
22nd
street
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classic
classification.
Excuse
me
our
m24
residential
multifamily
to
cg
commercial
general,
providing
an
effective
date
as
the
applicant
has
met
the
burden
of
proof
with
competent,
substantial
evidence
in
that
rezoning.
N
I
also
adopt
the
findings
and
reasoning
of
the
planning,
commission
and
city
staff
reports,
and
it
is
in
compliance
with
land
development
code.
The
purpose
of
zoning
category
is
consistent
and
compatible
with
the
existing
development
pattern
in
the
surrounding
areas,
and
I
believe
mr
horner
also
asked
for
revisions
between
first
and
second
reading.
N
H
D
R
Mr
shelby's
absence
I've
got
the
the
pd
site
plans.
If
count
council
wishes
to
see
them
just.
D
Danny
collins,
with
your
planning,
commission
staff,
have
been
sworn
in.
Our
next
case
is
also
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically
in
the
tampa
heights.
Neighborhood.
The
coast's
public
recreation
facility
is
robert
c
garner
park,
which
is
located
approximately
a
half
miles
from
northwest
of
the
subject
site.
Hostess
transit
stop
is
located
one
block
north,
the
subject
side
on
east
palm
avenue.
D
The
subject
site
is
not
within
an
evacuation
zone.
Here
is
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
and
surrounding
properties.
It's
just
west
of
the
interstate
or
west
of
the
interstate
and
between
north
central
avenue
and
north
jefferson
street.
It's
north
of
east
7th
avenue
and
just
one
block
south
of
east
palm
avenue.
The
surrounding
area
is
predominantly
residential.
There
are
some
non-residential
uses
along
east
palm
and
also
along
north
jefferson.
D
D
The
subject
site
is
within
the
tampa
heights
urban
village,
and
also
within
the
tampa
heights,
national
and
local
historic
districts.
The
comprehensive
plan
seeks
to
preserve
and
protect
the
character
of
the
districts
and
its
resources
planning.
Commission
staff
finds
that
the
request
will
not
alter
the
character
of
the
historic
districts
and
his
comparable
battle.
With
this
portion
of
tampa
heights
urban
village,
this
portion
of
east
oak
avenue
between
north
morgan
street
north
central
avenue
contains
three
existing
detached
single-family
residential
uses.
It
has
an
existing
density
of
six
point.
D
Thirteen
dwelling
units
per
acre-
this
density
is
seven
percent
of
the
density
that
can
be
considered
under
the
vesa
natural
id3
designation.
So
it
is
well
below
what
can
be
considered
on
the
site.
D
The
pd
proposes
five
dwelling
units
at
an
overall
density
of
eight
point:
six,
two
millimeters
per
acre,
which
is
also
well
below
the
density
that
considered
under
the
re-free
designation,
lock
this
on
this
segment
of
east
soaked
avenue
range
from
approximately
30
feet
to
120
feet
proposed
low
lists
are
well
within
the
range
and
the
plane
development
would
be
built
with
the
existing
street
block
and
lock
configuration
of
the
neighborhood
comprehensive
plan
directs
the
greatest
share
of
growth,
urban
centers
and
villages.
D
Our
request
would
create
additional
housing
opportunities
within
the
tampa
heights
urban
village,
which
supports
this
policy
direction.
In
conclusion,
the
proposed
plan
development
would
be
developed
with
a
similar
form,
height
and
height
lots,
size
and
scale.
The
surrounding
residential
uses
proposed
rezoning
supports
the
comprehensive
planet
would
not
alter
the
character
or
development
pattern
of
this
portion
of
the
campaign's
neighborhood.
D
G
I
I
This
is
going
from
a
pd
file
number
z99-27
to
pd
plan
development,
residential
single
family
detached
and
commercial
parking.
There
has
been
one
waiver
requested
to
request
or
reduce
the
eight
foot
required
vehicular
use
area
buffer
adjacent
to
the
right-of-way
to
five
feet
along
right-of-way
to
the
north.
I
The
development
is
for
the
property
to
have
five
residential
single-family
detached
units,
as
well
as
commercial
parking
to
the
west.
The
subject
site
contains
a
lot
area
of
twenty
five
thousand
three
hundred
and
seventy
seven
square
feet
or
approximately
point
five.
Eight
acres,
the
subject
park
parcel
is
located
at
the
intersection
of
east
oak
avenue,
north
jefferson
street
and
north
central
avenue.
I
The
parcel
surrounding
it
to
the
north
directly
consists
of
an
office
and
vacant
land
and
also
single-family
residential
uses.
Also
to
the
north.
These
are
zone
pd
and
rm24
to
the
west
directly
west,
you
have
an
office,
that's
also
zoned
pd.
I
The
project
for
the
five
residential
single
family,
detached
units
and
commercial
parking
I'll
show
you
a
site
plan
overhead
view,
one
two,
three,
four:
five
with
the
off-site
commercial
parking
for
the
adjacent
use
of
office
space
as
I'll
show
you
a
picture
in
a
few
seconds.
Can
I
ask
your
question.
C
R
Yes,
on
the
side
plan,
I
understand
the
in
regard
to
the
six
foot
six
foot
fences.
I
understand
why
they
might
be
optional
between
between
the
units
but
on
the
far
east
and
the
far
west
when
they
butt
up
against
adjacent
property
owners.
Why
does
it
say
optional.
I
That
is
from
the
applicant
if
they
choose
to
put
the
privacy
fence
on
the
site
plan
when
doing
the
building
permit.
R
I
I
Let
me
defer
to
aaron
natural
resources.
Maybe
she
could
speak
on
that
particular
quote.
If
there
isn't.
H
Hi
good
evening,
council
aaron
mayer
development
coordination.
How
are
you
guys?
I
have
been
sworn
yes,
they
used
to
use
buffer
in
between
this
single
family,
detached.
H
F
F
Five
foot
or
they're
not
required
to
provide
that
buffer
even
between
the
uses.
So
a
fence
was
not
required
by
code.
Okay
and.
F
R
Thank
you,
my
other.
My
other
question
is:
is
this
subject
to
the
arc
because
it's
in
tampa
heights.
A
I
This
is
not
in
the
arc
to
my
knowledge,
I
I
can
double
check
on
that.
H
Hi
elaine
lund,
with
the
architectural
review
commission
staff.
This
item
has
been
reviewed
by
the
arc
at
a
public
hearing
for
the
rezoning
recommendation.
It
was
reviewed
on
january
3rd
and
the
arc
voted
to
recommend
approval
with
one
consideration.
A
What
is
that?
Just.
H
To
add
a
note
to
the
site
plan
that
states
that
the
architectural
review
commission
is
authorized
to
adjust
the
front
side
and
rear
setbacks
of
the
primary
structures
up
to
a
five
foot
dimension,
to
increase
the
elevation
from
grade
up
to
an
18
inch
dimension
and
to
adjust
the
building
height
for
each
of
the
five
primary
buildings
up
to
five
feet.
In
order
to
ensure
compatibility
during
the
certificate
of
appropriateness,
review.
R
I
No
problem,
thank
you
so
much
zany
development
coordination
carrying
on
with
the
overview
of
the
site
plan,
a
total
of
10
parking
spaces
are
required
and
10
have
been
provided
by
the
applicant.
Vehicular
access
comes
from
a
public
alley
here
to
the
north.
As
you
see.
I
As
you
see
the
elevations
overhead
view,
with
a
maximum
height
of
35
feet
all
right
coming
out
to
the
site
itself,
as
you
see
the
vacant
land
right
here
in
the
picture
and
to
the
east
of
the
site,
you'll
see
the
office
spaces
and
vacant
land
up
and
down
the
streets
to
the
south
of
the
site.
I
You'll
have
that
that
pd
vacant
land
across
the
street
and
to
the
west
of
the
site
you'll
have
the
office
space
which
I
talked
about,
which
is
right
adjacent
to
the
vacant
land
of
the
proposed
parcel.
I
Development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
consistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
land
development
code.
Modifications
to
site
plan
must
be
complete
between
first
and
second
reading,
as
stated
on
the
revision
sheet,
if
approved
in
the
council
meeting.
Thank
you.
I
Correct
that
will
be
also
stated
in
the
in
the
modifications.
G
Thank
you
all
right,
any
other
questions
for
zane
all
right,
we'll
hear
from
the
applicant
and
swear
all
his
folks
in
mountain.
H
P
Thank
you,
mr
chairman
council
members
good
evening.
My
name
is
david
mechanic.
I'm
at
305
south
boulevard,
tampa
florida,
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
onyx
and
east,
the
developer
and
ultimate
owner
of
the
property,
but
with
onyx
and
east
with
me
this
evening
is
jacob
egan
and
justin
guy.
P
I
also
have
steven
espaco,
who
is
a
certified
planner
and
we'll
speak
to
you
in
a
few
minutes,
also
aaron
barker,
who
is
the
architect
on
the
project,
and
she
will
also
speak
with
you
in
a
few
minutes,
I'd
like
to
clarify
right
off
the
bat.
These
are
detached
single-family
homes.
These
are
not
town,
homes
and
the
code
I
mean
throughout
the
city.
You
see
that
single-family
detached
homes
do
not
have
or
are
not
required
to
have
perimeter
fences.
P
It
is
only
when
there
is
a
commercial
use
adjacent
to
the
residential
use
that
a
buffer
or
a
screen
would
be
required.
I'd
just
like
to
clarify
that
for
mr
d
felder,
we
do
agree
with
the
staff
recommended
revisions.
P
However,
we
would
respectfully
suggest
the
city
council
that
the
arc
condition
regarding
the
ability
to
change
our
setbacks
is
not
not
necessary
because,
as
we'll
be
explained
to
you
by
mr
spokado
and
this
barker,
our
our
proposed
design
is
entirely
compatible
with
the
neighborhood
and
they
will
address
that
in
just
a
minute.
I
would
like
to
just
mention
that
we
have
had
two
meetings
with
the
tampa
heights,
civic
association,
and
we
believe
they
are
supportive
of
the
request.
P
If
they
appear,
obviously
they
will
speak
for
themselves,
but
my
client
actually
made
several
design
changes
at
the
request
of
the
association.
P
We
also
conducted
a
separate
neighborhood
meeting
and
actually
no
one
elected
to
participate
other
than
the
adjacent
property
owner
to
the
north,
who
has
written
an
email
to
city
council.
That's
in
your
record
already,
who
is
express
support
for
for
our
project,
and
with
that
I
will
turn
it
over
to
steven
hosanto.
Who
will?
Oh
I'm
sorry.
I
jumped
the
gun
here.
I
I
need
to
address
the
one
waiver
which
stephen
will
will
speak
on
in
more
detail.
P
Our
waiver
is
to
reduce
the
dua
buffer
by
from
eight
feet
to
five
feet,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
the
required
four
parking
spaces
that
we
are
providing
for
the
property
owner
immediately
to
the
north.
This
is
a
little
bit
of
a
convoluted
situation,
but
this
actually,
this
property
is
part
of
a
larger
pd
zoning
that
the
city
applied
for
in
1999.
P
Since
that
time,
the
city
has
parceled
off
individual
pieces
to
this
pd,
to
the
point
where
my
clients
property,
is
the
last
remaining
undeveloped
parcel
within
the
old
pd
and
the
opd
said
our
property
was
available
to
provide
parking
to
the
property
owner
to
the
north.
So,
as
a
consequence,
the
staff
has
required
that
we
provide
that
parking
for
parking
spaces,
and
that
is
the
reason
why
we
need
the
waiver
from
eight
feet
to
five
feet.
P
We
are
only
asking
for
five
units,
so
it's
not
like
we're
trying
to
cram
a
big
huge
project
on
this
piece
of
property,
and
with
that
I
will
turn
it
over
to
stephen
to
describe
the
justification
for
the
waiver
in
more
detail
and
and
walk
you
through
the
site
design
and
then,
as
parker,
will
speak
to
the
compatibility
of
the
project
with
the
neighborhood.
Thank
you.
R
Yeah.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Before
we
go
into
into
those
two
experts,
mr
mechanic,
I
had
a
question
from
as
well.
Procedurally
just
from
a
process
perspective,
so
mr
mechanic
indicated
they're
not
perhaps
overly
thrilled,
with
the
condition
that
the
arc
is
attempting
to
impose
on
them
they're
in
for
a
brand
new
pd
they're
subject
to
the
arc.
R
What's
what's
the
status
of
that
condition?
Do
we
have
the
right
to
the
writer
ability
to
address
that
condition
today,
as
part
of
the
pd?
Have
you
guys
been
thinking
about
this
and
talking
about
this
in
advance
of
this
hearing
or
what.
F
Kate
wells
for
the
record,
the
arc
and
the
blc,
I
I
believe,
has
consistently
been,
including
that
request
when
they
are
recommending
a
rezoning
for
approval,
so
that,
when
the
project
comes
back
to
that
commission
for
a
certificate
of
appropriateness,
that
it
is
clear
on
the
site
plan
that
they
have
the
ability
to
adjust
those
setbacks.
F
Otherwise
it
has
been
the
position
of
the
city
that
the
setbacks
are
as
established
on
the
pd
site
plan.
So
it's
it's.
It's
appropriate
for
council
to
consider
the
arc's
recommendation
and
determine
whether
it's
appropriate
to
accept
that
request
for
a
condition
again
because
the
project
you
know,
I
I
believe
mr
mechanic
indicated
that
they
worked
with
a
neighborhood
association.
F
R
But
okay,
so
I
I
sort
of
have
it,
but
I
don't
know
from
a
process
perspective.
Let's
say
for
argument's
sake.
We
agreed
with
mr
mechanic
and
his
experts.
So
so
is
it?
Would
there
be
a
condition
on
the
site
plan
that
says
we're
striking
that
arc
provision
or,
conversely,
if
we
don't
agree
with
mr
mechanic
and
we
want
to
support
the
arc
with
that
condition,
then
then
how
do
we
do
that.
F
Between
first
and
second
reading,
that
condition
would
be
added
to
the
site
plan
similar
to
other
revisions
that
are
routinely
done
between
first
and
second
reading.
On
the
other
hand,
if
you
agree
with
mr
mechanic's
position-
and
you
don't
believe
that
that
condition
is
appropriate,
then
it's
just
not
added
to
the
site
plan
between
first
and
second
reading.
R
Okay,
all
right,
so
with
that,
mr
chairman,
I
would
suggest
that
we
need
some
additional
staff
and
I
apologize
council.
I
know
it's
getting
late,
but
we
need
some
additional
staff
explanation
about
why
the
staff
feels
that
it's
important
to
include
that
condition
and
the
young
lady
there
she
is
elaine.
R
R
And
also
I
don't
have
it,
I
don't
have
the
condition
in
writing
that
I
can
find
so
I'm
I'm
a
little
bit
unless
somebody
can
point
me
to
it
on
sire
or
somewhere
else.
R
H
Elaine
lund,
historic
preservation
staff,
the
arc
is
charged
with
making
sure
that
the
new
construction
in
the
historic
districts
meets
the
the
setbacks,
as
one
particular
condition
that
they
are
supposed
to
review
that
are
consistent
with
the
historic
pattern
in
the
area.
H
I
believe
the
applicant's
plans
show
that
they're
looking
to
sort
of
stagger
the
setbacks.
When
we
look
at
historically
developed
blocks,
frequently,
you
see
more
of
a
consistent
setback
along
the
block.
So
while
there
are,
I
guess,
diverging
schools
of
thought
on
whether
or
not
these
the
setbacks
should
be
staggered
or
consistent.
It
is
the
arc's
position
that
they
be
more
consistent
and
more
in
alignment
with
each
other.
R
H
Is
mostly
about
setbacks
and
also
height,
I
believe
also,
but
heights
should
be
consistent
as
well.
G
P
Yeah,
well
let
me
let
me
just
respond
to
those
last
points
and
I'll
be
very
quick.
We
we
are
now
the
what
is
being
recommended
to
you
is
just
that
of
recommendation.
P
I
would
also
point
out
that
you
know
all
of
these
processes
are
give
and
take,
but
there
are
changes
that
my
client
cannot
accommodate
because
of
the
physical
size
of
the
property,
for
example
the
side
setbacks.
P
So
this
isn't
a
case
where
we
could
just
say:
okay,
fine,
we'll
do
it:
it's
not
physically
possible.
So
anyway,
we
would
like
our
consultants
to
to
address
this,
but
I
I
would
just
like
to
make
that
point
before
that
steven
sposato,
if
you
would
speak
now,.
O
Yeah
good
evening
again,
my
name
is
stephen
spazzotti,
I'm
a
planner
with
level
up
consulting
505
east
jackson.
Tampa.
If
I
could
share
my
screen,
please.
O
Okay,
okay,
yeah.
Thanks
again,
I
wanted
to
thank
staff
for
introducing
the
site
in
the
context
and
I'm
going
to
focus
on
the
layout
primarily.
But
I
I
wanted
to
point
out
that
we
have
worked
extensively
with
staff
and,
as
dave
mentioned,
we've
had
a
robust
public
input
into
the
into
the
creation
of
what
we're
going
to
show
you
today,
I'm
going
to
jump
right
to
the
layout.
O
The
project
includes
five
lots:
they're
detached
single
family,
each
has
a
garage
utilizing
the
existing
alley.
The
minimum
front
setback
is
10
feet,
that's
the
minimum,
but
we
we
are
agreeing
to
vary
by
at
least
two
feet
to
provide
an
organic
quality.
Given
this
is
new
construction.
I
think
on
this
point,
I
don't
think
we
object
to
the
what
is
recommended
by
the
arc
in
terms
of
the
front
setback.
O
The
the
I
think,
the
more
critical
issue
that
we're
addressing-
and
I
think
dave
mentioned
that
as
well-
is
that
our
minimum
side
setback
is
this.
The
principle
structure
is
five
feet.
This
is
a
critical
feature
because
of
the
cross
section
and
the
width
of
the
property
in
the
in
the
form
and
the
pattern
of
development.
We
don't
have
the
flexibility
to
to
increase
that
setback.
O
O
We
are
providing
four
parking
spaces
right
here
and
at
this
point,
I'm
just
gonna
shift
just
to
show
a
little
more
detail:
utilizing
the
the
site,
the
site
plan
from
the
the
site
plan
again
lot.
One
has
the
four
parking
spaces
to
the
benefit
of
the
rcat
llc
owner.
O
O
We
are
proposing
to
reduce
the
vua
buffer
from
eight
to
five
feet
right
in
this
area.
Here
this
site
is
still
able
to
accommodate,
with
the
reduction
from
eight
to
five
we're
still
able
to
accommodate
the
landscaping
but
the,
but
we
do
need
the
four
spaces
in
the
and
it
would
not
fit
otherwise
without
the
without
the
three
foot.
O
The
project
in
architect
will
go
into
that
in
some
more
detail,
but
I
think
just
just
to
conclude,
as
stated
by
staff,
depending
condition
that
the
project
is
compatible
with
existing
development
pattern
and
it's
consistent
with
the
land
development
code,
as
well
as
the
comprehensive
plan,
and
with
that
I
will
turn
it
over
to
ms
barker.
H
G
H
Okay,
let
me
go
back
to
that.
H
The
each
home
also
include
includes
a
full
front
porch
across
the
front.
That
was
one
of
the
suggestions
that
we
had
from
the
neighborhood
committee
and
and
we've
incorporated
that
as
well.
H
H
H
We
have.
What
we're
asking
is
a
10
foot.
Separation
between
homes
and
tampa
heights
is
a
traditional
community
from
ybor
city
to
seminole
heights,
and
there
are
many
many
situations,
many
conditions
where
the
home
separations
are
much
less,
so
we
do
feel
that
the
10
foot
is
in
character
and
compatible
with
the
community,
and
with
that
I
will
hand
it
back
to
david
for
any
questions.
P
P
P
Finally,
I
will
point
out:
elaine
just
mentioned
that
they
want
to
change
the
height.
Our
height
is
proposed
at
35
feet.
Every
single
family
zoning
district
in
the
city
of
tampa
allows
a
height
of
35
feet.
I
can't
imagine
why
this
would
this
project
would
be
required
to
be
a
lower
height
than
every
other
zoning
district
in
the
entire
city,
and
with
that
we'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
R
Thank
you,
mr
mechanic,
good
evening,
so
in
at
some
point
during
the
discussion,
the
last
10
minutes,
I
thought
I
heard
somebody
say:
maybe
you
or
one
of
your
experts
that
you
were
okay
with
the
front
yard,
the
front
yard
setback.
R
Let
me
let
me
clarify
you're,
okay,
with
the
condition
that
the
arc
would
would
still
maintain
jurisdiction
as
related
to
the
front
yard.
The
front
yard
setback.
I'm
not.
I
don't
have
a
whole
lot
of
heartburn
about
the
side,
yard
setbacks.
You
know
whether
or
not
it's
10
feet
or
whatever
the
alternative
was.
I
I
don't
think
that's
a
huge
deal,
but
but
in
regard
to
the
front
yard
setback,
you
know,
I
I'm
not
an
architect.
R
I've
never
sat
on
the
arc,
but
but
I
want
to
respect
their
request
to
at
least
maintain
jurisdiction
over
that
as
the
design
evolves
and
it
sounds
to
me
like
you,
don't
have
a
you
don't
or
maybe
I
don't
want
to
put
words
in
your
mouth,
but
but
I'm
going
to
do
you
have
any
objection
to
you
know
to
to
allowing
that
as
a
condition
on
the
pv
site
plan
between
first
and
second
reading,
that
the
arc
would
retain
jurisdiction
as
to
only
the
front
yard
setback
and
not
the
side
yard
setback.
P
P
P
M
R
You
might
might
recall
bill
about
three
blocks
away
to
the
e
to
the
west
on
florida
avenue
they
had
that
r83
category
and
and
they
got
approved.
We
approved
the
high-rise
on
that
on
that
property
and
it
went
through
the
arc
process
they
weren't
thrilled
with
it.
But
but
so
that's
only
been
a
couple
months
ago.
I
think.
G
A
T
Good
evening,
council
members,
brian
seal
313
west
park
avenue
tampa
florida
33602
and
the
president
of
the
tampa
heights,
civic
association.
I
have
been
sworn
just
in
case.
You
were
wondering
if
we
were
going
to
be
here
since
we've
been
mentioned
a
few
times
in
the
previous
conversation,
I'm
here
to
state
our
support
as
an
organization
for
this
rezoning,
since
it's
come
up
I'll
specifically
address
these
staggered
setbacks.
That
was
something
that
our
association
requested.
T
It
was
reviewed
by
our
land
use
committee,
which
involves
folks
with
building
architecture
and
real
estate
backgrounds.
One
of
our
concerns
was
that
these
homes
looked
too
much
like
production
homes,
which
you
might
find
further
north
along
I-75
and
pasco
or
further
north,
and
so
to
avoid
that
and
bring
more
of
an
organic
feel
to
the
development.
T
That
was
one
thing
we
suggested
that
they
do
and
we
were
appreciative
that
they
did
further
into
the
design
we'll
get
into
that
with
the
arc.
We
believe
there
are
still
design
issues
to
be
resolved,
but
on
that
level,
from
a
site
plan
standpoint
again,
our
organization
supports
it.
We
are
appreciative
of
the
applicant
for
meeting
with
us,
after
being
invited
to
engage
with
the
neighborhood.
T
They
were
very
responsive
and
respectful
in
that
process,
which
is
important
to
us
and
believe
that
they
are
putting
forth
a
a
good
project
for
the
neighborhood.
T
Again,
there
are
certain
things
where,
in
certain
circumstances,
more
density
might
be
better
or
preferred,
or
certain
plans
of
the
prior
pd
that
used
to
exist
might
be
good
for
this
site
as
well.
But
given
what
has
been
proposed
and
the
strives
strides
they
have
made
to
get
it
to
fit
into
the
historic
district
is
why
we
support
it.
Thank.
A
H
F
H
F
M
You,
my
name,
is
shane
regal
coming
to
you
from
507
east
florisca
avenue
I
am
located
within
tampa
heights
and
I'm
also
part
and
located
in
within
the
historic
district.
I
wanted
to
voice
support
for
this
rezoning.
M
I
believe
that
especially
coming
from
a
historic
stance,
if
you'll
remember
kind
of
been
on
top
of
mind,
this
location
is
just
a
block
away
from
the
lamar
home
that
we
just
recently
lost
and
we
believe
that
there
I
believe
that
this
is
a
good
use
of
the
land
being
that
these
are
a
single
family,
but
more
of
a
compressed
area
right
across
the
street.
From
there
there
will
be
town
homes
and
then
right
down
the
road
from
there.
M
There
are
small
commercial
spaces,
so
it
is
really
kind
of
building
into
that
mixed-use
village,
and
I
believe
that
the
the
applicants
have
been
very
responsive,
very
willing
to
work
with
the
the
historic
district,
as
well
as
the
neighbors
in
the
area,
and
we
look
forward
as
they
go
through
the
design
process
to
working
more
with
us
in
the
area
as
well.
Thank.
L
R
Get
ready
all
right.
I
will
move
item
number
8rz,
21-96.
R
And
specifically,
I
believe
that
the
the
applicant
and
various
testimony
that
we've
heard
tonight
provides
competent,
substantial
evidence,
including
the
staff
reports,
the
testimony
that
we
heard
that
they
meet
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
and
comprehensive
plan
in
chapter
27
136
as
related
to
site
plan
controlled
districts
and
in
regard
to
the
the
waivers
as
well.
C
R
Yes,
sir,
I
didn't
know
there
was
a
revision
sheet.
Yes,
sir,
okay.
C
And
finally,
for
clarification,
so
there's
no
confusion
and
mr
mechanic
ultimately
perhaps
should
have
the
last
word.
If
there's
a
question
about
it,
but
just
so
clear
that
does
not
include
the
r
arc
modification.
Is
that
correct?
I
did
not
hear
that.
R
No
based
upon
the
testimony
I
heard
from
the
neighborhood
association
as
president,
I
believe,
they've,
given
this
careful,
this
particular
property
and
and
the
design
careful
consideration.
They've
made
a
persuasive
argument
as
related
to
the
staggered
front
yard
setback.
So
I
intentionally
did
not
include
that
in
the
in
the,
in
my
request
to
the
petitioner.
H
G
We've
already
handled
number
nine
earlier
in
the
evening
item
number
ten.
I
Thanks
so
much
zan
hussein
development
coordination,
gen
item
number
ten
case,
raz
21-115.
I
This
is
being
presented
first,
first
reading
consideration
for
the
property
at
1502,
north
nebraska
avenue
one
two,
one,
eight
one:
three:
zero,
two
one:
three:
zero:
four
one:
three:
zero,
eight
one:
three
one:
zero
one:
three
one:
two
and
one:
three
one:
four
east
k
street
and
eight
zero
one:
eight
zero,
three:
eight
zero;
five;
eight
zero;
seven,
eight,
zero,
nine
and
eight
eleven
east
third
avenue
for
proposed
rezoning,
rm16,
residential
multifamily
and
yc5
ebor
historic
district
2pd,
planned
development,
residential
single
family
attached
I'll
now
pass
along
to
danny
collins
with
the
planning
commission.
C
Miss
barry's
here:
okay,
okay,
all
right!
Thank
you,
mr
miscavige.
D
Danny
collins
with
your
planet,
commission
staff,
I've
been
sworn
in.
The
next
case
is
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically
in
the
central
park
urban
village.
D
Closest
public
recreation
facility
is
perry,
harvey
senior
park,
which
is
located
one
block
west
of
the
site.
The
closest
closest
transit
stops
jason,
the
site
at
the
intersection
of
east
k
street
north
nebraska.
The
site
is
not
within
a
locker,
I'm
sorry.
The
site
is
within
a
lovely
evacuation
zone.
D
D
This
segment
of
north
nebraska
is
brought
predominantly
non-residential
character.
The
tampa
park
plaza
is
directly
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site,
as
well
as
the
robert
s,
saunders
public
library
to
the
northwest
of
the
site
is
a
credit
union
office
building
and
then
to
the
south
of
the
site.
You'll
see
the
encore
apartments
are
within
one
block
south
of
the
subject
site.
D
Here's
an
here's,
the
adopted
future
land
use
map
the
subject
site
is
currently
recognized
under
the
urban
mix.
260
designation,
which
allows
residential
development
up
to
60
million
units
per
acre
subject.
Site
is
also
I'm
sorry,
is
adjacent
to
rmu
100
to
the
south
and
then
cmu
35
to
the
east.
On
the
east
side
and
north
of
nebraska,
the
umu
60
is
present
to
the
north
and
east
very
north
and
west
of
the
subject
site
funding.
D
Commission
staff
finds
a
request
for
residential
commercial
uses
on
the
site
comparable
and
compatible
with
this
surround
with
the
surrounding
development
pattern.
The
request
supports
many
of
the
policies
in
the
conference
plan
as
it
relates
to
housing
the
city's
population.
The
tampa
conference
plan
encourages
new
housing
on
baker
and
underutilized
land
to
ensure
that
an
adequate
supply
of
housing
is
available
to
meet
the
needs
of
tampa's
president
and
future
population.
D
The
press
will
provide
additional
housing
opportunities
and
employment
opportunities
for
residents
living
with
access
to
transit
in
the
central
park.
Urban
village
subject
site
is
within
a
mixed-use
corridor,
since
it
is
within
the
umu-60
category
plan
development
attempts
to
adjust
mixed-use
centers
in
quarter
policies
by
providing
public,
sidewalks
and
all
adjacent
public
rights
away,
and
internal
and
internal
pedestrian
connections
are
provided
throughout
the
site,
though
it
appears,
the
proposed
units
in
the
commercial
structure
are
placed
close
to
the
public.
Right-Of-Way
dwelling
units
and
commercial
entrances
are
not
identified
on
the
site
plan.
D
Residential
and
commercial
uses
within
mixed-use
borders
are
to
be
oriented
towards
the
street
with
entries
and
students
fronting
the
street
plus.
It
is
unclear
if
this
policy
direction
is
met.
Planning,
commission
staff
presented
these
concerns
to
the
applicant
and
in
our
in
our
drc
report.
These
concerns
were
not
addressed
on
the
submitted
site
plan
planning,
commission
staff,
informed
city
staff
and
strongly
recommends
that
they
address
this
policy
direction
between
first
and
second
reading.
D
Building
entrances
should
connect
to
a
sidewalk
along
an
adjacent
public
right-of-way
to
make
the
intent
of
the
mixed-use
border
policies,
while
the
fan
needs
to
address
the
mixed
use,
corridor
policies
between
first
and
second
reading,
the
requests.
Of
course,
many
of
the
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plan
as
it
relates
to
housing,
the
city's
population
and
and
also
the
request,
is
comparable
compatible
with
surrounding
development
pattern.
D
The
request
will
promote
a
residential
development
pattern,
consistent
with
the
compact
city
forum
strategy,
with
increased
availability
of
housing
at
densities
that
promote
walking
and
transit
near
employment,
concentration,
residential
services
and
amenities.
Furthermore,
the
request
is
consistent
with
the
intensity
anticipated
under
the
unu60
future
language
designation,
based
on
those
considerations,
planning,
commission
staff
finds
the
request
consistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
comprehensive
plan.
This
concludes
my
presentation,
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
R
Thank
you,
mr
collins.
I
don't
I
don't
get
it
I've.
I
heard
you
saying
that
that
the
design
is
is
wrong,
as
you
guys
saw
it,
they
didn't
respond
and
they
didn't
change
anything.
I
thought
for
once
I
was
going
to
hear
you
guys
say
you
recommended
denial
and
at
the
end
of
the
day,
I'm
looking
at
your
report,
and
I
heard
your
voice
and
you
said
consistent.
D
So
the
intense
for
the
mixed
use
policies
are
there
and
we've
done
this
in
the
past,
where
providing
just,
I
think
we
had
one
earlier
about
providing
entrances
to
the
buildings
between
first
and
second
reading
is
something
that
could
be
addressed
between
first
and
second
reading.
Overall,
this,
this
development
is
comparable
with
the
urban
development
pattern
surrounding
the
site.
So
that's
well.
I'm.
R
Not
questioning
I'm
not
questioning
the
density,
and
I
know
you
guys
are
the
guardians
of
massive
density,
but
you
know
you
threw
in
all
these
policies
about
design
and
stuff
and
then
you're
saying
well,
maybe
they
can
include
it
between
first
and
second
reading.
But
if
you
don't
recommend
denial,
then
there's
no
leverage
to
do
that.
D
The
applicant
addressed
several
policies,
as
stated
in
our
report:
excuse
border
policy,
internal
pedestrian
connections,
providing
sidewalks
along
all
public
right-of-ways,
the
intent
there
looking
at
elevations
where
the
entrances
are
oriented
and
the
elevations
are
oriented
towards
the
public,
right-of-way
they're,
just
missing
from
the
site
line.
So
that's
something
that
could
be
addressed
between
first
and
second
reading.
I
The
applicant
and
representative
is
mark
bentley,
this
proposed
resulting
from
yc5
and
rm16
to
pd
plan
development
residential
single
family
attached.
I
There
are
eight
waivers
that
are
being
requested
here:
first,
one
to
request
to
reduce
the
required
fifty
percent
retention
for
a
non-wood
lot
over
one
acre
to
nineteen
percent
retention.
I
I
The
fourth
is
to
request
to
reduce
the
required
eight
foot,
vehicular
use
area
landscape
buffer
to
zero
feet
along
k,
street
five
feet
along
third
avenue
and
three
feet
to
the
north
of
mitchell
driveway.
The
fifth
waiver
is
to
allow
a
reduction
in
aisle
width
from
24
feet
to
22
feet.
The
sixth
proposed
waiver
is
to
allow
commercial
traffic
access
to
a
local
street.
I
I
Now,
as
you
look
around
the
site,
you'll
see
the
property
to
north
and
the
west
of
the
subject.
Site
are
zone
pd
and
are
developed
with
office
uses
the
property
south
of
subject
site
is
arm
24
residential
multifamily,
and
this
developed
with
church
use
and
also
there
are
multi-family
units
down
there.
Next
to
scott
street.
I
As
I
went
out
to
the
site,
you'll
see
the
vacant
land
here
of
the
public
site
to
the
northeast
you'll
have
the
residential
jobs?
Are
the
commercial
up
and
down
street,
also
county
use
to
the
south
of
the
site?
You'll
have
vacant
land
and
also
church
use,
and
also
you'll,
have
residential
multifamily
to
the
west
site.
You'll
have
commercial
use
which
is
owned
pd,
as
I
was
talking
about
to
the
south
of
site.
You'll,
have
also
that
residential
multi-family
uses
and
to
the
east
of
the
site.
I
I
Development
review
and
comply
staff
have
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
inconsistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
land
development
code.
Modifications
to
the
site
plan
must
be
completed
between
first
and
second
reading,
as
stated
on
a
revision
sheet
by
multiple
staff
members
in-house.
If
you
have
any
questions,
I'm
here.
I
Yeah
of
county
parking
correct
on
the
on
the
right
here.
G
What's
the
one
at
the
parking
lot,
I'm
trying
to
get
case
k,
scott
third,
that's
boys
and
girls.
N
R
I
On
the
on
the
revenue
sheet,
there
are
multiple
staff
members
requesting
revisions.
The
planning
commission's
staff
requests
are
stated
in
their
in
their
report
on
the
memo,
which
is
part
of
the
staff
report
to
this
applicant.
R
I
don't
know
you
might
have
answered
my
question,
but
I
didn't
hear
it
the
specific
item
and
I
can
read
it
if
I
need
to
that.
Mr
collins
made
reference
and
he
said
I
hope
this
can
be
addressed
between
first
and
second
reading.
Is
that
specific
item
on
your
revision
sheet?
So
in
other
words,
when
mr
shelby
says
at
the
end
of
all
this
and
you've
included
the
revision
sheet,
I
don't
have
the
revision
sheet
in
front
of
me.
So
you
understand
my
question.
I
I
understand
danny's
from
the
planning
commission.
His
comments
aren't
directly
on
the
revision
sheet,
but
it's
in
the
staff
report,
which
needs
to
be
addressed
from
the
planning
commission.
I
G
All
right
any
other
questions
for
zane
all
right,
we'll
hear
from
the
applicant
mr
bentley
correct,
and
I
believe
all
you
guys
have
been
sworn
correctly.
Sir.
Q
J
Hi
michael
minsberg,
with
site
development,
the
applicant
here:
can
you
lift
the
microphone
up
a
little
bit
to
you?
Yes,
sir,
there
you
go
there.
You
go.
Thank
you
for
having
us
here
tonight,
just
real
quick
to
to
touch
on
before
I
get
into
it
to
touch
on.
R
J
Yeah,
just
real
quick
to
to
address
mr
ding
felder's
question
about
the
what
what
the
plan.
J
State
your
name
for
us,
sir.
Oh
sorry,
yes,
I
did
but
michael
mintzberg
was.
J
I'm
the
applicant
the
what
I
guess
and
I
apologize
for
missing
this.
We
if
you
look
at
if
you
look
at
our
plan,
all
of
the
units
are
facing
the
street
except
this
one
and
the
the
issue,
I
guess,
was
just
that
we
weren't
showing
the
door
there.
So
it's
not
a
a
big
issue
for
some
reason.
I
guess
it
was
a
scrivener's
area.
J
R
R
It
said:
okay,
here
we
go,
this
is
the
planning
commission
staff
report.
R
It
says,
though
it
appears,
the
proposed
units
in
the
commercial
structure
are
placed
closest
to
the
public
right-of-way.
The
dwelling
unit
and
commercial
entrances
are
not
identified
on
the
site
plan.
Residential
and
commercial
uses
within
mixed
use.
Corridors
are
to
be
oriented
toward
the
street
with
entries
and
stoops
fronting
the
street,
but
thus
it's
unclear
if
this
policy
direction
is
met
and
then,
above
that
it
says,
plan
development
attempts
to
address
the
mixed
use,
centers
and
quarters
by
providing
public
sidewalks
on
all
adjacent
public,
right-of-way
and
internal
pedestrian
connections.
R
J
Right,
I
believe
what
they're
saying
is:
the
commercial
entrances
were
not
identified
on
the
site
plan,
and
so
the
commercial
entrances
is
the
one
existing
building
there
and
I
think
they
just
left
the
entrance
is
off
of
it.
It's
a
boarded
up,
building
right
now
and
that
should
have
been
in
there.
I
apologize.
R
L
R
L
So
simply
all
we,
the
omission
was
this:
if
you
look
at
the
site
plan,
that's
in
your
backup
we
did
not
put
doors
on
the
units
which
we
intend
to
do
between
first
and
second
reading,
and
also
you
see
the
bubble
here.
There
are
sidewalks
that
the
planning
commission
requested
there
are
sidewalks
all
through
the
project
which
was
required
by
mr
collins,
so.
R
L
That
that
would
probably
help
a
little
bit.
You
could
see
the
bubble
right
here.
It
says
sidewalks
with
an
arrow
right
there
and
there's
a
few
of
those
around
the
site
plan,
but
that's
not
a
problem,
and
then
mr
dingfield
there's
a
6
000
square
foot
building
here
and
we
provided
an
elevation
showing
multiple
doors
or
access
to
nebraska
they're
not
shown
on
this
plan,
but
they're
shown
on
the
elevation,
which
is
in
your
backup
as
well
so
between
I'm
sorry
down
here.
L
R
J
All
right
great
glad,
we
got
that
out
of
the
way.
So
yes,
I'm
michael
minster
with
site
development.
The
applicant
here
we're
at
eboard-based
development
company,
have
been
for
over
10
years.
J
J
J
We're
we
are
proud
of
the
local
artist
community
and
have
developed
a
brand
for
this
project
to
pay
at
homage.
The
canvas
brand
stands
for
freedom
of
creativity
and
highlights
the
importance
of
local
arts
to
the
ybor
city.
We've
worked
with
a
local
artist,
sorry,
local
architect
and
artist
to
develop
the
the
plans
that
we're
working
on
for
the
finishings
and
the
interior
and
exterior
and
some
public
art
sculptures.
J
J
It
is
not
designated
historic,
but
we
think
it's
important
to
the
character
of
the
community
that
we
maintain
it
and
plan
to
renovate
it.
Making
this
a
mix
use
project
instead
of
knocking
it
back
down
to
build
more
town
homes.
Several
of
our
waivers
are
are
actually
because
we're
maintaining
this
existing
building
that
was
built.
You
know
not
to
today's.
J
Code
waivers
code
which
mr
bentley
will
get
into,
but
one
thing
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
is:
is
it's
it's
interesting
because
the
code,
the
way
it
reads,
and
that
some,
I
think,
should
be
work
on
worked
on,
actually
encourage
us
to
demolish
an
existing
building.
We
would
have
less
waivers.
J
J
You
see
on
the
site
plan
the
commercial
buildings
along
nebraska
with
parking
and
green
space,
creating
a
nice
buffer
for
the
townhomes.
One
thing
that
I
want
to
point
out
here
is
the
third
avenue
which
was
right.
There
was
vacated
when
gte
built
their
headquarters
there,
so
it's
created
a
very
unique
just
a
very
unique
block
here.
J
J
One
thing
that
I
want
to
point
out
is
just
what
surrounds
this
site:
you've
got
the
the
gas
works
development,
which
is
a
really
exciting
development
to
the
east
and
encore
to
the
south,
and
then,
of
course,
the
gte
headquarters
directly
north.
You
know
the
the
gas
works
and
encore
are
predominantly
rental
communities,
and
most
of
the
new
development
within
ebor
has
been
rental.
J
You
know,
I
think
it's
important
for
any
complete
neighborhood
to
have
home
ownership
opportunities
and
that's
something
that
that's
really
missing
from
that
eboard
district.
These
are
all
going
to
be
fee,
simple
town
homes
that
are
for
sale,
which
will
create
you
know
more
home
home
ownership
opportunities
which
I
think
will
be
great
for
the
neighborhood.
G
I
Thanks
so
much
daniel
saying
development
coordination,
I
I
kept
hearing
the
words
of
mixed
use,
but
this
is
only
being
presented
for
a
residential
single
family
attached
development.
There
is
no.
The
commercial
use
was
not
noticed
for
commercials
all
you
notice
for
a
residential,
single-family
detail
or
attached.
L
F
If
we
can
take
a
moment
because
when
I
had
looked
at
the
affidavit
for
notice,
I
believe
for
this
project
it
was
limited
to
the
residential
component,
so
if
we
can
take,
maybe
a
five-minute
break,
so
we
can
look
at
those
documents.
Okay,
all
right.
We
stand
in
recess.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
G
G
G
G
Right,
miss
wells.
F
Good
evening,
mr
chairman,
when
I
pulled
up
the
affidavit
of
compliance
with
the
notice
requirements,
I
confirmed
that
when
the
good
neighbor
notice
went
out
and
when
the
signs
were
posted,
while
it
identified
that
the
request
was
for
pd
zoning
when
it
included
or
identified
the
uses,
it
was
limited
to
residential
single-family
attached
and
did
not
include
the
commercial
uses
that
are
being
requested.
F
So
that
is
a
a
missed
notice
for
purposes
of
tonight's
meeting
and
I'm
extremely
apologetic
that
this
was
not
caught
earlier
in
the
process
or
certainly
when
it
could
have
been
corrected.
So
I'm
going
to
ask
saying
how
quickly
this
can
get
rescheduled
so
that
the
applicant
can
properly
notice
the
application.
Mr.
N
G
C
F
Yeah
marty:
we
don't
always
see
folks
that
are
on
the
second
floor,
when
we're
participating
through
the
webinar
all
right,
interesting.
L
Okay,
hey!
Thank
you.
I
want
to
point
out
a
few
things.
I've
been
doing
this
a
long
time
and
over
the
last
few
years,
we've
had
some
difficulty
with
some
of
the
local
jurisdictions,
including
the
city
as
to
how
to
notice
these
pd's.
So
what
we
do
is
before
we
send
out
the
notice
and
prepare
the
sign.
We
contact
the
land
development
services
department
and
say
exactly
what
do
you
want
us
to
put
on
the
sign?
L
Okay,
I
don't
have
the
emails
with
me
tonight,
but
my
my
assistant,
I
just
conferred
with
her
ashley
phillips,
said
she
contacted
and
they
said
the
predominant
use
was
single
family
that
the
townhomes
are
multi-family,
so
that
was
the
use
okay
that
would
put
on
the
sign.
Now.
If
you
take
a
look
at
what
your
staff's
presented
you
in
the
planning
commission,
they
shall
clearly
show
the
commercial
property.
L
L
Went
off
mark,
it
says
to
pd.
This
is
from
your
backup.
It
says
to
pd,
to
x,
amount
of
square
feet,
single
family
and
6
250
square
feet,
a
commercial
here's,
the
site
plan
that
was
signed
off
by
mr
hussein,
and
it
says
here
it's
the
one
before
you
and
it
says:
rezoning
request
for
property,
rm16
yc5
to
propose
zoning
pd
mixed
use,
then
the
entire
second
page
analysis
pretty
much
relates
to
the
commercial
component
of
the
project
in
terms
of
parking
and
things
like
that.
L
So
the
purpose
of
notice
is
to
let
someone
know
that
there's
some
kind
of
governmental
action
relating
to
a
piece
of
property.
So
in
this
case
we
didn't
put
on
specifically
oh
by
the
way,
there's
a
small
6000
square
foot,
building
associated
with
the
development,
but
we
did
put
pd
and
that's
the
zoning
we're
seeking
okay.
So
I
think
we're
really
kind
of
splitting
hairs
here,
especially
in
light
of
the
fact
that
we
confirmed
what
we
should
put
on
the
sign
with
the
zoning
department
before
we
posted
that
sign.
L
So
that's
that's
our
position
thanks,
ms
dingfield.
R
You
recognized,
mr
bentley,
I'm
sure
all
seven
of
us
who
are
sympathetic
to
to
the
to
the
plight
of
especially
the
plight
of
your
client,
because
I
know
time
is
money
and
the
problem
is
mr
bentley,
and
you
know
for
argument's
sake.
R
Let's
say
we
agreed
with
you
and
you
move
forward
and
you
get
you
get
this
done
and
and
everything
else
and
and
then
somebody
challenges
it
within
30
days
and
says
the
due
process
problem
and
and
then
you're
back
at
square
zero
and
you've
lost
you've
lost
those
those
two
months
and
you're
back
to
starting
over
again
because
they've,
because
ms
wells
is
on
the
record,
is
saying
the
city's
notice
procedure
is
has
not
been
upheld
and,
let's,
let's
assume
it
was
a
city
mistake.
R
I
don't
think
it
matters.
I
think
notice
is
notice,
is
notice
and
I
and
frankly
I
think,
mr
mintzberg,
I
want
you
to
hear
me
loud
and
clear.
I
I
you
know
I'd
love
to
see
you
guys
be
able
to
go
forward
and
get
a
vote.
I
don't
know
what
the
vote
is,
but
I'd
love
to
see
it.
But
I
I
would
say
if
I
was
your
attorney,
I
I'd
say
you're
at
risk
right
now
and
then
you're
going
to
be
down
the
road
and
who
knows
what?
R
And
I
I
think
you
just
gotta-
accept
ms
wells
opinion.
I
know
I
do.
L
R
The
city
would
lose,
we
can
throw
that.
We
can
throw
that
back
to
mrs
wells
then
as
well.
If
assuming
the
risk
makes
a
difference,
I'm
not
I'm
not
sure
it
does,
because
I
don't
know
if
the
city
is
at
risk.
You
can.
F
G
She's
already,
given
it,
I
think
that
she's
already
asked
zane
to
go
ahead
as
soon
as
we
can
get
this
back
on,
and
I
think
that's
where
we
need
to
go.
Mr
carlson,
you
recognize.
M
It
just
mr
bentley,
I
know
you
went
through
it
a
couple
different
times,
but
I
also
know
you
had
deep
knowledge
of
law.
Do
you
have
any
other
ideas
that
miss
wells
might
be
happy
giving
us
a
recommendation
to
move
forward.
L
You
know
one
thought
I
had
was
deleting
the
commercial
component,
but
that's
so
integrated
with
the
parking
for
the
balance
of
the
project
that
that
just
wouldn't
that
flat
out
would
make
any
sense
so
sure
to
go
along
with
miss
wells,
and
we
had
a
similar
situation.
Miss
wells
on
tampa
catholic,
as
you
recall
last
year,
where
we
didn't
indicate,
I
think
one
of
the
buildings
or
something
you
know,
and
then
some
of
the
neighbors
challenged
that
so
we
had
some
ongoing
debate
that
we
weren't
supposed
to
identify
every
specific
building.
I
The
next
opportunity
to
have
this
case,
miss
noticed
and
two
is
4
14
20
22.
That
will
give
the
applicant
enough
time
actually
to
even
make
the
revisions
stayed
by
staff
by
the
the
first
of
march
and
also
they
can
get
prognosed
by
314
2022.
G
Okay
motion
moves
4,
14.,
okay,
most
of
them
miss
miranda.
Second
by
mr
madison
favorite,
mr.
G
E
L
E
If
I
may,
mr
chairman,
my
my
only
concern
is,
if
and
again
I
don't
want
to
make
any
presumption
if
it
is
the
city's
error
just
to
get
it
sooner
than
later,
because
as
councilman
ding
felder
correctly
said,
time
is
money
again
if
it
is
the
city's
era,
just
just
putting
that
out
there.
I.
I
A
I
Right
now
we
have
13
cases.
I
know
one
might
be
withdrawing
so
we
have.
We
could
have
12
cases,
but
we
have
13
at
this
time
or
324
for
that
night.
Let's
see
for
notice,
notice
would
be
by
221.
G
E
You
I
mean
this
doesn't
appear
number
one.
We
have
the
potential
culpability
of
the
potential.
I
don't
want
to
get
into
that,
but
this
doesn't
appear
to
be
something
that's
going
to
take
a
lot
of
time
and
you
know,
given
the
apparent
facts,
just
the
sooner
the
better
again
time
is
money,
etcetera,
etcetera,.
L
G
G
L
E
G
E
H
L
Hello's
lake
canyon
request
is
to
vacate
the
alley
line
south
of
dark,
dr
martin
luther
king
jr,
boulevard,
north
of
virginia
avenue,
east
north
boulevard
and
west
of
clearfield
avenue.
The
sally
was
created
for
subdivision
of
platte,
a
sub
of
block
5
west
arlington
heights,
and
the
alley
is
located
in
central
tampa
near
south
seminole
heights.
This
alley,
vacating
is
associated
with
the
application
rez
21-120.
L
The
application
was
filed
on
9
20
21,
the
applicant
owns
property
on
the
north
and
west
side
of
the
alley
that
is
requested
to
be
vacated.
The
applicant's
reason
for
the
application
is
as
follows:
there
was
a
previous
ali
partially
vacated
and
there
was
a
dead
end
and
also
to
vacate
the
alleyway
for
a
new
townhome
project.
L
The
previous
approved
vacating
for
the
west
portion
of
the
east
and
west
section
of
the
alley
per
ordinance
2009-82
the
applicant
did
not
meet
the
vacating
conditions
and
the
ordinance
is
considered
voided.
This
alley
is
not
in
a
historic
or
overlay
district.
There
are
currently
no
existing
code
violations
to
this
property.
L
The
alley
consists
of
ten
thousand
four
hundred
square
feet:
it's
unimproved
grass
and
there
is
no
apparent
use
from
a
budding
property
owners,
is
open
to
the
south
and
fenced
on
both
east
and
west
ends.
The
wastewater
facilities
are
located
in
a
portion
of
the
east-west
section
of
the
alley.
Storm
water
and
frontier
have
facilities
in
the
northwest
in
the
north
and
south
section
of
the
alley
and
require
partial
easements.
L
And
just
for
more
information,
the
previously
vacated
alleys
within
a
vicinity
of
the
area.
L
L
Again,
a
continuation
of
the
alleyway
looking
west
from
north
boulevard,
not
to
be
vacated
staff,
have
no
objections
to
this
vacation
request
based
on
responses
received
from
reviewing
agencies.
If
the
vacating
request
is
approved
by
council,
easement
reservations
are
required
for
wastewater
storm,
water
and
frontier.
L
G
Right
any
questions
for
the
gentleman
I
see
mr
winkington's.
There.
G
All
right
you
wishing
to
speak,
sir.
E
N
Yeah
orders
corner
that
was
it,
and
that
thing
was
the
first
one
to
have
a
gas
station,
a
couple
of
pumps
in
the
back
of
it
and
in
the
front
they
sold
flowers
and
people
would
stop
there
and
it
was
a
busy
busy
busy
location.
So
I'm
glad
that
guido
reminded
me
the
name
of
it
hooters
corner
so
you're.
G
C
Is
there
is
there
the
applicant?
Is
there
an
applicant
associated
with
this
vacation.
G
The
applicant
with
this,
it's.
G
So
we
is.
C
G
The
application
on
the
second
floor,
no,
no
all
right
is
there
are
they
are
you
registered.
G
A
H
G
Q
H
Yes,
rachel,
can
you
please
mute
yourself
and
turn
your
camera
on.
A
H
Q
G
C
Q
It
is
and
they're
together
the
applications
appreciate
that
again,
my
name
is
stephen
thompson.
I'm
attorney
with
the
law.
Firm
of
anatomy
cops.
I
have
been
sworn.
I
have
an
office
at
109,
brush
street
and
with
me
today.
I
also
have
the
applicant
larry
vargas.
So
if
there
are
any
questions,
but
we
are
seeking
to
vacate
this
alley,
the
alley
was
created
by
platt.
The
flat
was
recorded
back
in
the
early
1900s.
Q
The
alley
has
never
been
used,
it
certainly
has
never
been
approved
and
what
we're
proposing
is
an
attached
single
family
development
for
the
property.
In
order
for
us
to
do
it,
the
alley
would
have
to
be
vacated.
We
worked
with
the
staff.
The
staff
has
no
objections
to
our
request
to
vacate
this
alley.
They've
requested
partial
easements
for
wastewater
storm,
water
and
frontier.
Q
Certainly,
we
will
provide
those
partial
easements,
but
again
we
do
request
the
approval
of
this
alley
and
if
you
have
any
questions,
we're
here
to
answer
them
any.
A
H
T
T
G
R
You'll
recognize
yourself,
mr
shelby.
In
the
past,
haven't
we
told
the
applicant
to
go
ahead
and
make
their
presentation
for
both
the
vacating
and
the
and
the
rezoning,
and
then
we
combine
we
combine
the
the
comments
I
mean
is
that.
C
Would
be
that
would
be
certainly
the
case.
Yes,
sir.
I
think
I
think
that's
what
we
tend
to
do,
but
we
just
have
to
make
sure
procedurally
that
when
we
close
the
public
hearings,
we
move
number
15
first
before
we
take
up
number
11.
and-
and
that
is
particularly
true
on
the
adoption
when
it
comes
back
because
otherwise.
I
Thank
you
so
much
zane
hussain
development
coordination
going
to
agenda
number
11
case
rez
21-120
this
for
the
proposed
resulting
at
622
and
642
west
martin
luther
king
jr,
boulevard
and
3912-3915-3917
north
boulevard
for
a
proposed
rezoning,
pd
plan
development,
2pd
plan
development,
residential
single
family
attached
I'll
now
pass
it
along
to
danny
collins.
Funny
question.
D
Danny
collins,
with
your
planning,
commission
staff
of
them
sworn
in
our
next
case,
is
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district.
More
specifically,
the
temple
heights
urban
village.
The
closest
recreation
facility
is
calvin
taylor
park
being
located
500
feet,
southeast
of
the
subject
site
closest
transit.
Stop
is
located
to
the
north
directly
across
from
the
site.
Unless
martin
luther
king
boulevard
transit
stopped
the
service
by
heart
route,
32
connecting
the
site
to
tampa
international
airport
and
nat
park
transfer
center,
the
study
is
not
with
is
located
within
a
level
d.
Evacuation,
stop!
D
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject.
Center
surrounding
properties,
you'll
see
the
site
is
generally
northeast.
At
the
intersection
of
mlk
and
north
boulevard,
you'll
see
there
are
non-residential
uses
along
mlk
boulevard.
D
There
are
some
attached
single-family
residential
uses
directly
to
the
east
subject
site
and
also,
once
you
get
off
boulevard,
there
are
some
residential
uses
along
orient
and
virginia
avenue.
There
are
also
some
non-residential
uses
directly
to
the
west.
D
This
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
Subject:
majority
of
the
subject
sites
currently
recognized
under
the
cmu
35
designation,
with
the
southern
portion
of
the
site,
recognized
under
the
residential
10
designation,
subject,
site
surrounded
by
the
cmu
35
to
the
north
east,
south
and
west
or
I'm
sorry
to
the
west,
to
the
south
into
the
east,
is
a
land
recognized
under
residential
10
designation
finance,
commission
staff
review
the
application
and
found
no
inverse
impact
surrounding
neighborhood
portion
of
west.
D
This
portion
of
mlk
boulevard
between
north
ola
avenue
and
north
riverside
drive
explaining
the
subject's
site
is
existing
density
of
9.72
acres
or
9.72
units
per
acre.
The
request
proposes
20
single-family
attached
units,
an
overall
density
of
20.2
units
per
acre,
which
is
below
the
density
anticipated
under
the
cmu
35
future
land
use,
designation
planning,
commission
staff
finds
that
the
representative
of
the
character
of
the
surrounding
area
is
comparable
compatible
with
this
portion
of
tampa
heights
neighborhood.
D
D
D
Since
portions
of
the
site
are
within
a
mixed-use
corridor,
those
portions
are
that
are
designated
cme
35
final
commission
staff
would
request
that
any
revisions
by
site
plans
provide
a
pedestrian
connection
from
units
14
through
20
to
the
sidewalk
on
north
boulevard.
These
connections
will
help
in
pedestrian
safety
and
accessibility,
as
well
as
meet
the
intents
of
mixed
reporter
policies.
I
Wonderful,
thank
you
so
much.
The
applicant
here
is
rachel
bailey
for
the
address
at
642,
622,
west
martin
luther
king
and
three
nine
one,
seven,
three,
nine
one.
Five
and
three
nine
one:
two
north
boulevard,
the
proposed
resulting
from
pd
to
pd
residential
single
family
attached,
has
two
waivers
one
waiver:
to
request
to
decrease
the
special
street
setback
from
60
feet
to
45
feet.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
To
the
northern
site
is
the
the
pd
convenience
store
and
retail
sales
and
to
the
east
of
the
site.
You'll
see
more
single-family
homes
to
the
southwest
site.
You'll
have
the
cleaners
and
also
you'll,
have
office
space
up
and
down
the
boulevard.
I
I
Sheet
and
stated
in
this
presentation,
thank
you,
I'm
here
for
any
questions.
Any.
G
R
Planning,
commission
danny
might
have
mentioned
it
when
you
have
two
different
land
use
categories
like
you
do
here,
they
got
the
cmu
35
community,
mixed
use,
35
on
the
northern
side
and
the
r10
on
the
southern.
What
is
the
code?
What
does
the
comp
plan
say
about
the
blend?
You
know
the
blending
of
the
two.
Do
you
take
the
average
of
the
two?
Do
you
take
the
weighted
average
of
the
two?
How
does
that
work.
I
D
Hey
so
so,
since
this
is
within
an
urban
village,
they
can
proportionately
weigh
the
flyer
ratio
or
density
over
the
entire
site.
R
Then
then,
then,
that
property
owner
to
the
south,
all
of
a
sudden
says
hey
what
gives.
D
Or
under
the
urban
villages
policy
that
they
allow,
basically
in
a
unified
pd
you
can
it
allows
the
opportunity
for
that
you
know
proportionally
weigh
the
the
land
uses
and
the
flooring
ratio
over
the
entire
site.
They're
not
doing
it.
This
within
this
case
specifically,
but
certainly.
D
R
D
I
I
mean
I
I
can't
see
just
because
of
the
zoom,
but
it
looks
like
that's
the
art
and
boundary
line.
Okay,
so.
Q
For
the
record,
my
name
is
stephen
thompson.
I
have
been
sworn
again.
This
really
is
a
redevelopment
project.
This
property
has
been
vacant
for
more
than
10
years.
I
think
staff
has
done
a
great
job
in
presenting
the
plan.
Basically,
what
we're
proposing
is
a
single
family,
a
cash
community.
Q
These
will
be
for
sale
homes,
not
a
rental
property.
Again
we're
going
to
be
creating
opportunities
for
people
to
buy
into
this
community,
and
I
think
we
believe
that
home
ownership
really
strengthens
the
community
and
the
neighborhood.
I
think
once
people
buy
in
there's
a
certain
pride
that
goes
with
it.
So
that's
what
we're
looking
for
with
this
development,
the
request
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
in
the
city's
land
development
regulations.
Q
The
staff
has
also
deemed
this
request
to
be
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
ldr
has.
The
staff
has
also
recorded
recommended
certain
modifications,
we're
going
to
include
those
modifications
into
our
site
plan
for
second
reading.
Again,
we
would
request
approval,
as
recommended
by
staff,
and
if
you
have
any
questions,
I
have
mr
vargas
here
to
answer
any
questions
along
with
myself.
G
G
C
A
H
T
We
disagree
with
the
development
coordination's
finding
that
this
plan
is
consistent
with
the
comp
plan
and
land
development
code.
First,
the
single-use
residential
project
is
proposed
on
land,
80
percent
of
which
is
designated
cmu
35
in
order
to
achieve
the
highest
and
best
use
of
the
land
accomplish
the
city's
comp
plan
intent
comply
with
the
2003
tampa
heights
neighborhood
plan
and
enhance
tampa
heights
with
publicly
usable
amenities.
This
project
should
be
mixed
use
with
a
legitimate
commercial
component.
T
The
argument
that
commercial
uses
don't
financially
work
on
this
site,
which
the
applicant
made
to
us,
is
false.
All
three
other
corners
of
martin
luther
king
boulevard
and
north
boulevard
intersection
contain
commercial
uses,
including
a
high
volume
cvs
pharmacy.
The
site
is
a
walkable
draw
for
thousands
of
residents
from
tampa
heights,
riverside
heights
and
south
seminole
heights.
The
tampa
heights
community
plan
calls
for
this
intersection
to
be
a
commercial
convenience
center,
which
is
consistent
with
the
comp
plan.
T
Second,
the
site
plan
perpetuates
a
lazy
and
incompatible
design
that
has
become
popular
in
tampa's
urban.
Core
single
use.
Townhome
projects
are
wrong
for
tampa's
commercial
corridors.
They
are
chosen
over
mixed
use
because
of
their
ease
and
cheapness
of
construction
and
the
ability
for
a
developer
to
quickly
extract
profit
from
a
neighborhood
and
move
on
instead
of
considering
apartments
or
condos,
where
units
can
be
stacked
on
each
other
or
over
commercial
townhome
design
is
significantly
limiting.
They
also
present
layout
problems
to
achieve
density.
T
In
a
pattern
we
see
frequently
and
consistently
opposed
this
project
has
seven
units
with
front
doors
facing
an
alley
instead
of
a
street.
As
was
noted
tonight,
I
caught
on
to
the
fact
that
the
site
plan
posted
publicly
does
not
have
the
note
required
for
the
waiver
from
code
section
29-282.9
that
needs
to
be
added
in
between
the
second
reading.
That
was
not
publicly
posted.
T
Let
me
be
clear:
tampa
civic
association
does
not
oppose
density
since
it
meets
housing,
demand
supports
public
transportation
and
encourages
walking.
We
are
a
pro
density
association,
however.
Density
has
to
be
designed
right.
Finally,
this
applicant
utterly
failed
to
engage
the
community
to
the
point
of
disrespect.
T
This
council
has
previously
stated
that
the
quality
of
a
developer's
relationship
has
no
bearing
on
the
application.
That
is
true,
however,
when
a
developer
ignores
neighborhoods
and
surrounding
property
owners.
That
is
a
violation
of
the
comp
plan
and
land
development
code
per
the
land
developer.
The
comp
plan,
private
sector
responsibility,
land
use
policy,
15.1.3
encouraged
developers
to
contact
neighborhoods
with
the
help
of
the
city
to
advise
residents
early
in
the
process
of
upcoming
projects.
T
That
email
was
never
met
with
a
response
I
emailed
them
again
on
january
14th,
after
which
I
promptly
heard
from
their
attorney,
not
the
applicant
asking
if
they
can
still
present
to
us
on
january
27th.
We
of
course
welcomed
them.
However,
their
appearance
was
pointless
because,
two
weeks
before
the
hearing
is
too
late
to
make
substantial
changes,
these
actions
speak
volume
about
the
applicant's
lack
of
concern
about
how
their
project
affects
the
community.
T
In
fact,
lewis
and
dorian,
hernandez
of
3920
north
clearfield
avenue
a
home
immediately
to
the
east
of
this
site,
were
here
at
city
hall
tonight,
but
had
to
leave
due
to
personal
reasons.
They
asked
me
to
make
clear
that
they
are
opposed
to
the
project
and
were
never
contacted
by
the
applicant.
They
found
out
through
facebook,
that's
unacceptable
and
would
offend
any
of
you
who
lived
next
to
this
site.
In
conclusion,
for
the
aforementioned
reasons,
the
tampa
high
civic
association
asks
city
council
to
deny
this
rezoning
and
the
associated
vacating
of
the
alley.
T
L
Good
evening,
city
council.
M
I
don't
really
have
too
much
to
follow
up
after
mr
seal.
I
do
want
to
say,
though,
a
big
concern
for
me
in
this
project
is
obviously
all
the
stuff
that
mr
seal
mentioned
earlier,
but
I
would
also
like
to
chime
in
on
the
affordable
housing
component.
There's
no
affordable
housing
at
all
in
any
of
these
units
with
any
type
of
density
off
of
a
commercial
corridor.
M
I
would
like
to
see
at
least
10
percent
of
any
type
of
development
being
dedicated
to
affordable
housing.
If
you're
gonna
put
additional
density,
we
didn't
get
any
cra
either.
One
of
them
it'd
be
nice
to
get
it
in
other
areas.
So
hopefully,
if
we
could
see
that
happen,
that
would
be
amazing
because
it's
badly
needed
right
now
in
tampa
heights
really
everywhere
in
tampa,
but
especially
in
my
neighborhood,
I'm
seeing
a
change
every
day
and
the
hard-working
people
of
tampa
really
can't
afford
to
live
in
the
neighborhood.
M
I
couldn't
even
afford
to
buy
my
house
now.
If
I
didn't
buy
there
13
years
ago,
I
wouldn't
be
able
to
afford
to
live
in
my
own
neighborhood,
it's
kind
of
a
shame.
So
hopefully
we
can
get
some
level
of
affordable
housing
requirements.
I
know
that
we
can't
really
codify
that,
maybe
at
the
moment,
but
if
we
can
do
it
through
other
means,
then
that
would
be
amazing.
M
M
507
east
florida,
I
have
been
sworn
in
yeah,
I'm
actually
coming
to
you
as
a
member
of
the
neighborhood.
I
do
live
on
flora
nebraska,
which
would
be
considered
more
of
a
mixed
use-
commercial
corridor.
We
do
have
king
state
right
across
the
street,
but
then
we
do
mostly
have
houses
on
this
road
when
we
look
at
where
the
applicant
wants
to
place
their
homes.
Yes,
there
are
still
some
homes
that
are
remaining
from
when
mlk
used
to
be
the
city
line,
but
most
of
those
homes
are
becoming
businesses.
M
Tampa
heights
and
riverside
heights
rely
on
these
commercial
corridors
because
they
are
what
is
going
to
be
able
to
give
us
services
and
have
that
15-minute
walkable
neighborhood.
We
are
not
seeing
the
commercial
mixed
use
that
is
intended
with
the
original
purposes
of
this
neighborhood
and
they
were
not
even
considered
as
part
of
it.
M
This
was
met
with
the
opposition
from
most
of
the,
I
would
say,
100
of
the
neighbors
when
it
was
presented
at
the
most
recent
civic
association
meeting
that
I
just
happened
to
be
at,
and
we
are
not
hearing
a
proper
argument
for
why
we
should
be
rezoning
this
to
be
100
residential
again.
I
think
that
the
one
thing
that
we
need
to
notice
is
that
this
is
on
the
burden's
on
the
applicant
and
we
are
not
hearing
the
reason
why
we
should
rezone
this
to
be
fully
residential.
M
Additionally,
there
are
some
concerns
when
it
comes
to
the
safety
of
having
all
of
the
traffic
funnel
onto
north
boulevard
right
there
from
all
of
these
homes.
So
I
do
echo
what
our
president
of
the
civic
association,
as
well
as
the
vice
president,
say
we're
not
hearing
that
the
burden
has
been
been
met,
to
explain
why
this
should
be
done
as
well
as
vacating
the
allies.
So
thank
you.
N
Mr
chair,
please
martin,
mr
shelby,
are
you
on
the
line?
Yes,
sir,
I
need
your
advice.
Do
you
have
this
packet
for
this
petition
in
front
of
you.
P
E
I
think
that
may
be
mine.
If
I
may,
it
was
that
from
brandon.
N
Tj
and
also
there's
another
councilman's
name
on
that-
oh
okay,
I
want
to
I
want
to
have
this
clarified.
We're
under
such
scrutiny,
scrutiny
right
now.
E
I
need
to
have
this
clarified
and,
if
I
may,
yeah
sent
by
brandon,
therefore
it's
it's
obviously
mine.
We
received
a
a
facebook
message
which
nobody
replied
to
which
I
submitted
pursue
it
with
applicable
ethics,
etc.
From
a
gentleman
I
I
haven't
seen
it
since,
and
I
submitted
it
for
the
record.
I
believe
that
a
duplicate
of
that
facebook
message
was
also
sent
via
email,
so
you
may
not
have
checked
your
messenger,
I
don't
know,
but
I
sent
it
just
to
be
safe.
N
It
it
says,
greetings,
gentlemen:
I'm
asking
you
as
a
resident
of
south
seminole
heights.
The
purpose
is
at
the
corner
of
mlk
and
north
boulevard,
so
I
would
think
it
would
have
something
to
do
with
this
case.
I
would
think.
E
N
Mark
council-
I
I
am
just
wanted
to
say
I
I
have
never
seen
this-
I
just
want
to
put
it
out
there
to
the
universe,
to
make
sure
that
we
are
covered
on
this.
Otherwise
I
will
recuse
myself
until
this
matter
is
solved.
R
Me
ask
you
this,
mr
shelby.
Can
I
help
clarify
for
a
second?
What
more
do
I
need?
Okay,
I
looked
on
sire
tonight
and
that
I
believe
that's
where
mr
sutra
is
seeing
this.
The
the
document
he's
talking
about
is
on
sire
there.
It's
already
yeah,
it's
already
part
of
the
public
record.
It
appears
that
perhaps
brandon
did
what
she
was
supposed
to
do,
which
they
right.
They
took
a
a
text
message
or
a
facebook
message.
R
Whatever
it
was,
did
a
screenshot
sent
it
to
sire
it's
on
sire
and
by
the
way
right
below
that
on
sire,
mr
tj,
I
don't
know
who
he
is,
but
mr
tj
sent
the
same
exact
message
by
email,
which
also
got
included
in
sire
yeah.
So
it's
no
harm,
no
foul,
it's
all
on
sire
and
and
it's
all
part
of
the
public
record
and
part
of
the
this
case
file,
and
it
looks
like
it's
been
there.
I
don't
know.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
see
a
date.
It
looks
like
it's.
R
There
is
no
date
on
there.
There's
a
date
on
the
email,
there's
a
date
on
the
email.
N
D
C
Well,
it's
I
don't.
I
don't
have
the
sire
pulled
in
front
of
me,
but
what
it
sounds
like
and
I
can
pull
it
up
for
my
emails,
but
it
sounds
like
it
sounds
like
the
disclosure
of
an
ex
parte
communication
that
was
properly
put
into
sire
and
properly
made
available
in
advance
of
tonight's
vote.
So
it
appears
that
now
and
we
had
this
public
discussion
about
it,
it
has
been
disclosed
and
it
is
now
a
part
of
the
record.
So
I
don't
see
unless
you
have
a.
C
If
you
have
an
additional
concern
that
I
can
address,
I
don't
see
how
more
we
can
cure
or
solve
this
problem.
It
has
been
fulfilled
by
the
process
to
bring
it
into
sire
and
to
make
it
part
of
the
record.
M
Mr
shelby,
mr
shelby
people
mention
us
all
over
the
internet
all
the
time,
and
some
of
it
is
positive
and
a
lot
of
it's
negative.
If,
if
somebody
posted
something-
and
it
had
mr
sietro's
name
or
one
of
the
others
of
us-
and
he
didn't
see
it
until
tonight-
he
has
no
obligation
to
he
didn't
post
it.
He
didn't
interact
with
them
and
he
didn't
see
it.
So
he
had
no
obligation
to
put
that
in
there
right.
I
N
C
So
there's
no
need
for
you
to
recuse
yourself,
there's
no
basis
for
you
to
recuse
yourself.
Can
you
be
fair
and
impartial
and
judge
this
case
both
these
matters
by
competent,
substantial
evidence
in
the
record,
of
course?
Well,
if
that's
the
case,
sir,
then
on
the
florida
statutes,
you'd
have
an
obligation
to
vote.
You
don't
have
a
financial
interest
in
either
of
these
matters.
Is
that
correct?
That's,
correct,
okay!
C
Well,
then,
I
think,
I
think
the
process
it
appears
has
worked
and
it
has
been
disclosed
and
it
doesn't
require
you
to
abstain
unless,
as
we
said,
it
would
affect
your
ability
to
be
fair
and
impartial,
and
you
said
that's
not
the
case,
so
I
suggest
that
the
matter
is
sufficiently
resolved.
Thank.
E
E
Of
the
public,
we
had
received
a
messenger
email
that
I
believe
was
duplicated
by
regular
email.
I
saw
it
immediately.
Screenshot
it
center
made
said,
send
it
to
the
appropriate
person
and
and
and
that's
it,
but
I
I
thank
councilman
citro
for
being
very
detailed
in
this
better
safe
than
sorry
right.
C
You
actually
councilman
vieira.
I
would
say
that
you
followed
that
process
quite
appropriately.
A
Q
Thank
you
for
the
record
stephen
thompson
and
again
as
soon
as
I
found
out
from
the
civic
association,
I
want
to
have
a
meeting.
I
scheduled
that
immediately
we
did
have
a
meeting
with
the
civic
association.
Q
Clearly
what
the
civic
association
wanted
was
commercial
on
that
property,
but
again
that
property
has
been
vacant
for
more
than
10
years.
There
really
is
no
market
for
commercial
on
that
property.
There's
no
requirement
that
we
need
approval
for
commercial
on
the
property,
but
we
do
believe
that
with
our
community
that
we're
proposing
when
you
begin
to
build
owner-occupied
phones,.
Q
Whereby
you
can
have
commercial
in
this
area
in
the
future,
but
at
this
point
in
time
we
believe
that
our
request
is
consistent
with
the
city's
comprehensive
plan,
but
your
staff
has
made
that
determination.
Q
We
would
request
approval
of
the
report
of
the
both
the
vacation
and
the
zone.
Thank
you.
R
Yet
yeah
I
didn't,
we've
heard
we've
heard
from
all
of
them.
He
that
was
his
rebuttal
and
that's
it.
That
was
the
rebuttal
all
right.
R
Zane,
you
probably,
I
think
you
said
this
earlier,
but
I
was
looking
at
the
staff
report.
The
staff
report
mentions
only
one
waiver
is
that
correct,
correct
and,
and
it's
missing
the
waiver
for
the
waiver
request
for
those
seven
units
that
are
on
the
correct.
I
That
was
that
was
added
this
past
week.
R
I
Wonderful
great,
so
if
you
see,
if
you
see
14
15,
16,
17,
18,
19
and
20.
I
Correct
the
situation
they
need
to
have
that
waiver
for
all
the
doors
facing
the
outside
there's.
The
alleyway
is
not
considered
a
street
right-of-way.
So
that's
that's
the
exact
example.
Why
still
need
that
waiver?
Because,
right
now
the
vacating
is
not
approved
so
as
of
right
now
they
do
need
as
it's
not
a
right-of-way
street,
they
will
need
the
public
right-of-way
street.
They
will
need
a
waiver,
because
these
doors
do
not
face
that
public
broadway
street.
That's
an
alleyway!
I
Q
We're
just
aware
that
wait
that
second
waiver,
but
we
do
have
a
problem
with
that,
we'll
incorporate
it
into
our
plan
before
second
reading.
Q
R
Well,
as
as
miss
wells
pointed
out
several
times
tonight,
it's
the
applicant's
burden
to
prove
their
case,
including
waivers,
probably
including
and
especially
waivers.
So
this
is
your
moment
to
articulate
a
reason
for
the
waiver.
Just
you
know
I'm
just
wanting
mr
chairman.
I
just
want
to
give
them
a
fair
chance
as
related
to
due
process,
and
if
you,
if
you
feel
you
needed
a
continuance
because.
A
A
A
R
I
Thanks
so
much
zane
hussain
development
coordination.
Yes
in
the
zoning
code,
section
27-282.9,
we
go
to
c
one
in
development
requirements
and
ice,
and
I
quoted
states
the
ground
floor,
entrances
front
doors
to
the
dwelling
units
shall
face
a
street
right
of
way,
not
including
alleys
rather
than
the
side
or
corner
lots
corner
lines.
I
So,
as
is
the
site
plan,
they
would
need
a
waiver
for
those
doors
facing
the
alleyway.
A
Mr
kingfielder
made
a
comment
earlier
about
the
property
to
the
south.
There's
I
think
a
46
foot
setback
to
the
building
from
the
property
to
the
south
and
approximately
12
12
and
a
half
to
13
feet
on.
R
Yes,
I'm
comfortable
with
that
southern
that
southern
question
that
got
responded
to
by
staff
as
as
related
to
the
r10
looks
like
you
have
no
units
in
the
r10.
So
I'm
okay
with.
G
N
I'm
not
going
to
read
it.
Mr
chairman,.
G
Okay,
mr
dean,
claude.
R
No,
I'm
I'm
not
going
to
read
it
either
and-
and
frankly,
I
want
to
speak
to
both
of
these,
because
I
don't
think
we
should
be
vacating
if
we're
not
going
to
if
we're
not
going
to
approve
the
pd,
but
I've
got
a
problem
with
the
pd.
I
think
that,
specifically
the
waiver,
I
don't
believe
the
petitioners
met
their
burden
on
on
the
waiver
for
for
those
units
facing
an
alley.
R
The
code
says:
27282.9
c1
code
says
that
that
units
should
face
a
street
and-
and
these
are
backed
up
against
an
alley-
the
front
door
goes
out
to
an
alley
and
into
and
looks
out
over
somebody
else's
backyard.
R
And
you
know
I
it's
it's
a
planned
development.
I
don't
believe
they've
met
the
standards
for
for
the
waiver
and
therefore
I
would
urge
council
to
to
deny
the
the
petition,
as
well
as
the
vacating.
A
O
Number
15.
have
an
ordinance
being
presented
first
reading,
consideration,
ordinance,
rescinding
and
repealing
ordinance
number
2982,
which
vacated
closed
discontinued
and
abandoned
the
right-of-way
alleyway
located
south
of
marlin
to
king
junior
boulevard,
north
of
virginia
avenue,
east
of
north
boulevard
and
west
of
clearfield
avenue
within
the
plaid
of
west
arlington
heights.
A
subdivision
in
the
city
of
tampa
hillsborough
county
florida
due
to
petition
of
failure
to
comply
with
the
conditions.
O
Precedent
has
set
forth
in
the
aforementioned
ordinance,
approving
a
new
ordinance
vacating
closing
discontinuing
and
abandoning
the
same
right-of-way
alleyway,
plus
an
additional,
interconnected,
right-of-way
aloe
alleyway
in
the
same
area
as
more
fully
described
in
section
one
here
of
subject
to
certain
covenants
conditions
and
restrictions.
As
more.
G
Yeah,
you
can
say
mr
maniscalco,
just
oh
yeah,
we
want
to
it.
We
just
need
to
vote.
We
he's
getting
a
second
to
to
get
a
vote.
R
H
C
F
C
That's
correct,
you're
right,
you're,
absolutely
right,
and
if
we
can
then
mr
wigginton
did
you
want
to
address
the
the
the
legal
basis
for
granting
a
vacate
just
to
remind
council.
A
Well,
first
of
all,
I'd
just
like
to
thank
you
very
much
ron,
wigginton
legal.
R
Department,
although
the
vacating
application
and
the
rezoning
application
are
related,
the
vacating.
E
R
E
A
R
You
thank
you
if,
if
you're
done,
mr
shelby
and
thank
you
to
both
of
you,
if
you're
done
I'll,
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
to
deny,
and
that
would
be
what
15.
R
yes
vac
21-9,
specifically
based
upon
all
the
testimony
we've
heard,
I
don't
believe
that
the
general
public's
interest
is
served
by
the
vacating.
Moreover,
the
conditions
of
vagrant,
vagrancy
or
trash,
and
that
sort
of
thing
is
not
relevant
in
this
because,
as
has
been
shown
in
the
photographs
this
prop,
this
entire
property
has
been
fenced
off
for
a
long
time.
So
there's
really
been
no
public
access
to
to
the
alley
or
or
the
property
in
general.
It's
probably
an
illegal
offense
for
that
matter,
but
anyway,
that's
the
side
issue.
H
G
F
C
C
Necessarily
have
to
entail
reading
the
title
of
the
ordinance.
Whatever
motion
is
in
order
a
council
as
long
as
it
resolves
the
issue.
R
At
this
point
I
would
be
just
just
in
the
spirit
of
fair
play.
Perhaps
I
would
be
amenable
to
reopening
and
asking
the
petitioner
if
they'd
rather
withdraw
the
application
as
opposed
to
having
a
denial
and
the
only
reason
I
say
that
is
in
terms
of
time.
If
you
get
a
denial,
then
you've
got
to
wait
a
long.
G
Yes,
sir,
did
you
hear
mr
dean
fellas
questions.
Q
Yes,
for
the
record
stephen
thompson,
I
appreciate
that
I
would
wonder
if
the
council
would
consider
maybe
a
continuation.
It
seems
to
me
that
the
basis
of
you
know
the
concern
is
the
failure
to
provide
the
support
for
the
waiver.
Q
I
guess
I
would
like
to
maybe
if
we
could
continue
this
for
two
months,
go
back
there
and
give
the
council
the
full.
You
know
attention
and
representation
and
basis
for
the
waiver
request
and
see
if
the
council
could
be
persuaded
at
that
time.
Q
I
know
we've
got
the
denial
for
the
vacation,
but
I'm
wondering
if
maybe
that
could
be
a
reconsideration
of
that,
but
it
seems
to
me
that
the
the
fundamental
issue
or
concern
had
to
do
with
that
sec
with
the
waiver
and
the
failure
of
the
applicant
to
provide
the
or
to
meet
its
burden
for
the
council
approving
the
waiver.
So,
if
possible,
I
would
request
a
continuation
as
opposed
to
withdrawal.
G
Well,
that's
not
my
concern
on
number
11,
not
the
waiver.
G
That
was
one
aspect,
but
my
concern
is
the
rezoning,
especially
that
corner
of
boulevard
and
emile
king,
that's
all
commercial
around
there
and
again
the
neighborhood
being
really
involved
in
in
this
process.
I
didn't
really
hear
a
lot
of
that.
I
represented
a
neighborhood
being
involved
with
this,
this
application
for
number
11..
So
it's
not
just
a
waiver
for
me,
so
I
had
other
concerns
on
number
11..
It
was
the
result,
but
again
any
questions
on
the
did
you
ask
for
continued.
I
think
mrs.
F
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
just
for
the
record
kate
wells
chief
assistant
city
attorney.
I
just
wanted
to
respond
briefly
to
the
comment
that
council
just
made,
while
the
neighborhood
would
like
to
see
a
different
use
at
that
intersection.
That
is
not
the
question
before
this
city
council
on
this
application.
F
This
application
is
before
you
requesting
a
certain
use
based
on
a
design
that
is
set
out
in
a
plan
development
site
plan.
So
the
question
is
whether
that
proposed
rezoning
complies
with
the
land
development,
good
criteria,
as
well
as
relevant
goals,
objectives
and
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
and
not
whether
there
is
a
better
use
or
one
that
the
neighborhood
would
like
to
see
as
opposed
to
what
is
before
you.
F
N
C
Shelby
this
is,
it
depends
on
what
council,
what's
council's
pleasure,.
N
There's
no.
This
is
just
my
opinion.
When
you
look
at
number
15
number
15
has
it's
a
part
of
number
11
only
because
if
15
fails,
11
can't
pass
so
I
mean
you're,
51
and
50
of
another
one.
So
what
are
we
doing?
And
my
my
feeling
is
that
unless
you
this
one
has
to
pass
with
the
other
one
to
be
heard.
So
what's
the
council's
responsibility,
we
already
said
we're
not
going
to
vote
to
close
the
alley.
N
We
should
stick
to
the
alley
only
not
to
the
resulting
part,
because
you're
going
to
get
yourself
mixed
up
in
something
else
that
may
not
be
favorable
later
on
in
life.
So
I'm
just
looking
at
closing
the
alley.
I'm
not
looking
at
the
petition
for
the
property
development
that
sits
in
top
of
the
alley.
N
M
But
as
well
considering
what
what
councilman
miranda
just
said,
it's
impossible
to
pass
11
now-
and
I
know
we
have
a
rule
that
once
the
hearing
starts,
the
applicant
cannot
withdraw
their
proposal,
but
is
it
possible
we
could
wave
that
or
or
should
we
just
deny
this
and
if
we
denied
it,
then
on
what
basis
would
we
deny.
F
However,
if
the
request
for
withdrawal
is
received,
after
notice
of
hearing
has
been
provided
pursuant
to
section
27-149,
which
in
this
case
the
notice
of
hearing
has
been
provided,
no
application
for
the
reclassification
of
all
or
any
part
of
the
land,
which
is
the
subject
of
the
application,
shall
be
allowed
for
six
months
following
the
data
for
state
of
the
notice
of
withdrawal.
So
if
the
applicant
were
to
withdraw
the
application
this
evening,
there
would
still
be
a
six-month
waiting
period
before
an
application
could
be,
and.
G
Mr
thank
you.
R
Thank
you
to
everybody
for
their
input
to
legal
counsel,
for
the
petitioner
again
I
gave
it
gave
it
a
shot,
but
but
it
doesn't
look
like
that's
gonna,
anything's
gonna
help.
So
with
that.
In
regard
to
item
which
one
eleven.
C
Sorry,
I'm
sorry,
I'm
sorry,
mister
challenge.
Let
me
be
clear,
there
was
no
motion
to
reopen.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,.
R
Okay,
thank
you
I
just
like
to
put
it
to
bed
in
regard
to
item
11,
raz
21-120
I'll
move
to
deny
this
petition
for
the
property
located
at
three.
Let's
see:
642
and
622
west
mlk
3917-3915-3912
north
boulevard,
specifically
due
to
the
failure
of
the
applicant
to
meet
its
burden
of
proof,
providing
confident
substantial
evidence
that
the
development
as
conditioned
and
shown
on
the
site
plan
is
consistent
with
the
comp
plan
and
city
code
and
the
applicant's
failure
to
meet
its
burden
of
proof.
R
With
respect
to
the
requested
waivers,
specifically
that
there
are
two
waivers
being
that
were
requested
waiver
20
related
to
27
160,
as
related
to
the
special
street
setback
from
60
feet
to
45
feet
and
the
other
waiver
27-282.9c
one
as
related
to
seven
units
facing
the
alley,
which
is
contrary
to
the
code.
Again,
the
the
as
related
to
those
waivers.
They
failed.
The
petitioners
failure
to
comply
with
section
27-139
per
n4
and
has
failed
to
show
the
need
for
the
waivers
and
the
fact
that
they
were
supported.
R
Specifically
that
it
that
it's
an
inappropriate
use
on
this
site
and
that
it
does
not
comply
with
the
development
land
development
code.
The
applicant
did
not
provide
evidence
that
the
the
proposed
design
is
unique
in
order
to
justify
the
waivers
and,
moreover,
the
applicant
did
not
provide
evidence
that
the
requested
waivers
will
not
substantially
interfere
with
or
injure
the
rights
of
others
whose
property
would
be
affected
by
the
waiver.
Okay,.
L
M
Just
procedural
thought
to
think
about
for
the
future,
and
maybe
councilman
miranda
has
in
the
past
some
solution
for
this.
But
it's
clearly
when
we
when
we
approve
projects,
we
go
down
the
line
and
we
all
are
pretty
good
at
that.
But
one
of
us
is
better
than
the
rest
by
far
I
think
at
rejecting
them,
and
because
of
that,
we
all
wait
on
him
to
do
it,
and-
and
I
I'm
terrible
at
denials
and
mr
dingfeller
is
great
at
it.
M
But
what
happens
is
that
in
the
development
community,
I
think
we
we
deny
very
few,
but
we
probably
approved
98
of
the
or
more
of
the
ones
that
come
before
us,
but
we
get
blamed
for
the
the
ones
that
are
upset,
but
mr
dingfeller
in
particular
gets
blamed
because
he
happens
to
be
good
at
it,
even
though
seven
of
us
might
vote
against
it,
and
so
my
question
not
to
be
answered
now
is:
is
there
some
way
to
fairly
go
down
the
line
just
like
we
do
on
the
positive
ones?
We
don't
the
problem.
M
E
I,
if
I
may,
I
think,
that's
a
great
idea
in
the
sense
that
if
it
fails-
and
it
would
appear
that,
there's
and
again
not
going
on
the
substance
of
anything,
I'm
tired,
no,
no
issues
but
just
going
down
the
line
because
it
sort
of
compels
everyone
to
be
good
at
it.
I
guess
if
you
will
for
lack
of
use
of
a
better
term,
so
something
to
think
about.
G
It's
called
really
like
a
football
coach
if
I'm
good
at
defense,
I'm
good
at
defense
and
I
can
look
at
it.
I
can
look
at
a
scheme.
Mr
miranda,
I
can,
I
can
look
it.
I
can
tell
and
miss
calling
you
right.
Mr
dingfield
has
some
expertise
and
he
can
pick
up
things
that
we
miss
sometimes
and
he's
like
wow.
Then
we
look,
it
happens.
You
know
it's
just
he
has
a
specialty
and
you
can't.
You
can't
knock
that
you
can't
not
you
can't,
you
can
say
hey.
G
Sometimes
he
saves
us
because
we're
possibly
making
a
mistake.
Sometimes
so
I
mean
you
know,
sometimes
it's
good
with
the
bad,
but
he's
the
he's
the
guru
at
and
what
he
does
of
the
subject
matter.
We,
you
know,
I'm
still
learning
I
have
to
pick
up
things.
I
mean
love
is
still
learning,
but
he
is
who
he
is.
He
is
who
he
is,
and
we
thank
you
for
it,
sir.
We
thank
you
for
it.
Thank
you
all
right
out
of
number
12.
I
Thanks
so
much
zane
hussain
development
coordination
agenda
item
number
12
case
rez
21-123.
This
is
being
presented
for
first
reading
consideration.
The
property
at
4510,
south
manhattan
avenue,
is
proposed
rezoning
from
rs60
residential
single-family
and
cg
commercial
general
2pd
plan
development.
Residential
single-family
attached
I'll
now
pass
it
along
to
danny
collins
with
the
planning
commission.
D
Danny
collins,
with
your
planning,
commission
staff,
have
been
sworn
in.
Our
next
case
is
down
in
the
south,
tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
in
the
fair
hopes,
manhattan,
manor,
neighborhood,
the
closest
transit
stop
is
adjacent
to
the
subject
site
on
south
manhattan
avenue.
It's
trying
to
stop
to
serve
by
art
route
17,
which
connects
the
site
to
britain
plaza
and
port
tampa
subject:
site
is
within
a
level
g
evacuation
zone.
D
Subject:
site
is
within
a
level
d,
evacuation
zone
portions
of
the
site
are
within
the
coleslaw
hazard
area.
D
This
is
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject:
site
surrounding
properties.
Subject:
sites
generally
located
south
east
of
south
manhattan
avenue
and
west
fair
oaks
avenue.
There
are
attached
single
family
residential
uses
to
the
north
of
the
subject
site.
There
are
some
residential
uses
directly
to
the
west
of
the
site.
Also,
there
are
some
churches
in
proximity
of
the
site
to
the
west
and
also
to
the
south
and
south
east
of
the
site,
are
churches
and
a
private
school.
D
D
However,
this
rezoning
is
contingent
on
tacpa
2122,
which
proposes
1.8
two
acres
of
the
site
under
the
cmu
35
designation
and
one
acre
under
the
r10
designation.
D
You
saw
this
at
your
hearing
on
january
27th
and
it
was
approved
at
first
greeting,
if
approved
at
second
reading
on
february
17th
2022,
the
platinum
will
become
effective.
Mid-March
excuse.
M
Me
can
I
ask
a
question:
is
this
the
is
this
the
methodist
site
again.
D
This
is
the
site,
that's
it's
presently
vacant.
I
believe
it's
yeah.
I
believe
it's
under
ownership.
I.
M
I
apologize
somehow
I
missed
it
again,
and
so
I
need
to
recuse
myself,
because
my
firm
works
for
the
organization
related
to
this
site.
R
Yes,
sir,
go
ahead,
mr
just
for
the
record,
mr
carlson
recusing,
or
abstaining
due
to
a
conflict
with
a
client
go
ahead.
Sir.
D
So
again,
if
tacpa
2122
is
approved,
approximately
one
acre
of
eastern
portion
of
the
site
would
be
designated
residential
10
in
the
western
portion,
which
is
approximately
1.2
acres,
would
be
designated
cmu
35.
D
Commission
reviewed
the
request
and
finds
the
finds
out.
The
request
supports
many
of
the
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
as
it
relates
to
housing
the
city's
population.
The
tampa
comprehensive
plan
encourages
new
housing
on
vacant,
underutilized
land
owned
shark
with
supply
of
housing.
It's
about
to
meet
the
needs
of
campus
president
future
populations.
D
D
Since
portions
of
the
site
are
within
the
mixed
use,
corridor
planning
commission
staff
encourages
the
applicant
to
reorient
the
entrance
unit
one
so
it
is
oriented
towards
south
manhattan
avenue
avenue
between
first
and
second
reading
applicant
has
agreed
to
add
design
features
to
the
western
wall
of
unit,
one
specifically
adding
a
door
and
a
sidewalk
extension
which
will
connect
to
the
sidewalk
on
south
manhattan
avenue
planning.
Commission
staff
has
determined
that
these
design
features
will
meet
the
intent
of
the
mixed-use
border
policies.
D
In
conclusion,
the
request
is
consistent
with
the
intensity
anticipated
under
the
community.
Mixed
use,
35
and
residential
10
density
is
consistent
with
the
land
use
underlying
future
land
use
designations.
Based
on
these
considerations,
planning
commission
staff
finds
the
request
consisting
of
the
city
of
america.
I
I
I
These
are
developed
with
single
family
uses
and
also
commercial
uses
up
and
down
properly
properties
directly
to
the
west.
Right
here
are
zoned
cg
and
developed
with
a
place
of
religious
assembly.
A
church
properties
select
directly
south
are
zoned
rm
50,
and
this
is
a
retirement,
home
and
properties
east
of
the
subject.
Property
is
zoned,
rs-60
and
developed
with
a
place
of
religious
assembly,
also
a
church.
I
I
I
To
the
west,
you
have
the
religious
place
of
assembly
to
the
south.
You
have
to
the
south.
You
have
the
sorry
lost
train
of
thought
here,
sorry
to
the
south,
you
have
the
retirement
home
and
also
commercial
uses
down
there
to
the
south
to
the
north.
You
have
commercial
uses,
also
and
also
residential.
I
Development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
consistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
land
development
code.
Modifications
aside,
plan
must
be
completed
between
first
and
second
reading
of
ordinance,
as
stated
on
the
revision
sheet,
if
approving
the
application
today.
Thank
you
I'm
here
for
any
questions.
Mrs.
N
Q
Jonathan
scott
city
of
tampa
transportation,
planning.
C
O
C
O
N
For
that
one,
okay,
all
right,
thank
you
jonathan,
but
I
could
have
sworn
I
saw
that
that
was
brought
down
to
21
feet
with
the
flush
curbs.
Thank
you,
mr
hussein.
Do
you
re
do
you
know
why
the
fire
white
fire
rescue
has
a
complaint
about
this.
I
I
can
follow
up
with
a
fire.
Look
at
their
memo,
see
what
they
stated,
but
I
believe
that
their
mini
needs
were
met
prior
to
this
being
set.
I
I
can
pull
up
the
memo
and
see
what
was
stated
by
by
fire,
but
before
this
was
set,
it
was
met
and
it
was
able
to
go
through.
N
S
We're
from
the
applicant
thank
you
am
I
on
you're
all
thank
you,
rebecca
kurt
with
brooks
shepherd
and
rocha
at
400
north
campus
street
sweet
1910..
I
am
excited
to
be
here
tonight
representing
lennar
holmes
on
this
project.
We
have
parker
hirens
and
chelsea
hardy
remotely
from
lennar
homes
and
anna
rentenower,
sorry
and
nico
de
armas,
from
clearview
available
for
technical
questions
and
steve
henry
is
also
available
remotely.
If
there
are
any
transportation
questions
welcome
back,
miss
kirk
yeah.
Thank
you,
councilman
sitro.
S
I
can
answer
the
question
the
the
fire
department
and
I'm
sure
your
staff
will
verify
this
when
they
read
the
memo
did
not
have
any
problems
with
the
presentation.
As
long
as
when
we
went
through
permitting,
we
met
all
fire
code,
which,
of
course
we
will.
They
had
a
technical
comment
that
we
did
not
have
the
scale
on
our
site
plan,
which
is
correct.
Our
site
plan
was
to
scale,
but
we
did
not
have
the
scale
on
it,
which
is
something
that
we
will
correct
between
first
and
second
reading,
so
it
was
just.
S
The
number
was
left
off
again.
As
was
stated
earlier,
this
project
came
before
you
recently
for
a
comprehensive
plan,
change
from
public
semi-public
to
cmu,
35
and
r10
that
was
unanimously
approved
with
councilman
carlson
recusing
himself,
councilman
dingenfelder.
I
did
want
to
address
that
because
you
would
raise
a
concern
in
an
earlier
hearing
about
the
effects
of
spreading
between
r10
and
cmu35.
S
S
They
addressed
a
lot
of
the
reasons
why
we
believe
that
we
are
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
your
land
development
code.
The
site
is
currently
vacant
and
your
comprehensive
plan
encourages
new
housing
on
vacant
and
under
utilized
parcels.
So
we
think
that
that's
a
main
way
that
we're
meeting
your
comprehensive
plan.
The
site
is
unique
in
that
it
is
narrow
along
manhattan
avenue,
but
it's
a
deep
site,
it's
145
by
660,
and
it
has
commercial
to
the
northwest
portion
of
the
site
and,
and
it
has
single-family
rs-60
along
the
remainder
of
the
northern
portion.
S
S
We
will
be
limited
at
three
stories
by
our
plan.
We
are
also
providing
a
drainage
pond
on
the
north
end
of
the
site,
which
will
be
an
amenity
to
our
residents
and
also
a
buffer
to
the
single
family
to
the
north
of
the
project.
As
was
noted
by
the
planning
staff,
the
project
is
along
a
mixed-use
corridor,
manhattan
avenue
and
the
area
has
a
variety
of
housing
types.
We're
additionally
going
to
be
supporting
the
comprehensive
plan
by
providing
additional
housing
types
adjacent
to
a
transit,
stop
immediately
adjacent
to
the
transit
stop.
S
S
I'm
going
to
have
our
engineer
come
up
and
explain
why
this
the
21
feet
still
provides
safe,
driveway
access,
but
I
did
want
to
point
out
again
due
to
site
constraints,
including
the
pond,
to
the
north
of
the
property,
which
is
as
tightly
engineered
as
we
can
do
it
to
protect
the
trees
along
the
northern
boundary
of
the
property.
We
don't
have
the
ability
to
do
the
full
24
feet
before
I
pull
them
up.
I
did
just
want
to
show
you
on
the
wolf.
S
S
Thank
you,
and
this
is
a
situation
that
your
code
is
envisioning,
90
degree
angle,
parking
lot
parking
spaces
which
are
adjacent
to
other
parking
spaces,
limiting
your
maneuverability
and
also
adjacent
on
the
other
side
to
additional
parking
spaces.
That's
not
the
situation
we
have
here
and
I'm
going
to
provide
some
expert
testimony
to
you
on
that.
G
N
S
It
is
21
feet
and
I
believe
it
it
does
show
21
feet,
but
we'll
make
sure
that
that
is
correct.
N
M
R
M
R
R
R
Pond
and
so
point
to
the
two
single
family
homes
that
or
the
at
least
the
one
that
that
I'm
that's
behind
the
dumpster,
no
keep
going.
There's
the
dumpster
right.
Okay,
as
somebody
who
lives
right
behind
right
next
to
a
commercial
dumpster,
it
doesn't
matter
how
many,
how
much
you
call
the
solid
waste
people
and
ask
them
not
to
pick
up
early
or
what
have
you
they
come
when
they
want,
and
often
that's
like
five
in
the
morning
five
six
in
the
morning
and
and
my
distance
is
pretty
similar
to
that
distance.
R
So
you
might
say:
well
it's
across
a
pond
and
this
and
that,
but
some
might-
and
I
know
you
you
have
to
have
a
dumpster-
you
need
to
have
a
dumpster
for
all.
You
know
for
20
something
units
24
units,
but
can
you
slide
it?
You
know
further
south.
Can
you
put
it
somewhere
else?
So
it's
not
going
to
be
impacting
those
single
family
homes,
because
on
on
fair
oaks,
that
when
I
looked
at
the
site
plan,
that's
what
jumped
out
at
me.
S
Councilman
lennar
obviously
always
wants
to
be
sensitive
to
neighbors.
We
don't
have
any
objection
to
roll
out
cans.
R
S
R
R
If
you
want
to
strike
the
dumpster
and
and
figure
it
out
between
first
and
second
reading
or
whatever
or
I
don't
know,
I
guess
these
days
we're
paying
mr
shelby
and
and
and
ms
wells
to
answer
that
question.
So
maybe
they
maybe
they
can
help
us
out.
Procedurally.
F
G
I
Zane
hussain
development
coordination,
if
you're
requesting
the
applicant
to
make
changes
to
the
solid
waste
you
can
ask
them
to
have
it
add
to
the
site
plan
between
first
and
second
reading
and
I'll.
Have
my
staff
look
at
it
either
tomorrow
morning
or
when
the
new
site
plan
is
delivered.
R
S
S
N
R
I
did
have
one
other
question,
mr
chairman:
miss
kurt
two
two
things
number
one.
Is
there
any
sidewalk
connecting
on
the
north
on
the
north
side?
So
all
these
folks,
you
know,
supposedly
I
guess,
have
a
doorway
out
sort
of
facing
that
little
storm
water
pond.
Is
there
a
sidewalk
to
connect
these,
so
people
can.
R
R
Concrete
walk
typical,
okay,
all
right
as
long
as
as
long
as
zayn
as
long
as
you're
good
with
that
identifying
sidewalk,
then
that's
good
with
I'm
good
with
that.
I
did
have
another
question,
but
I
forgot
okay
nevermind.
S
I
Watching,
following
up
on
the
question
about
fire,
I
did
check
the
fire's
memo
and
it
is,
their
comma
was
inconsistent
due
to
the
updated
site
plan
not
being
to
scale,
but,
as
I
asked
for
my
knowledge,
it
is
okay
for
fire
and
between
first
and
second
reading.
This
can
be
corrected.
S
Thank
you,
council.
The
second
waiver
we're
requesting
is
272829c1,
which
you've
heard
about
several
times
tonight,
which
is
a
request
to
allow
the
ground
floor
entrances
of
the
dwelling
units
to
face
a
courtyard
rather
than
a
street
right
of
way
again,
due
to
the
fact
that
our
lot
is
narrow
and
deep.
We
only
have
one
unit
facing
the
street
right
away
after
discussions
with
the
planning
commission
on
how
to
best
address
the
goals
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
S
In
addition
to
providing
the
notice
that
the
city
code
required,
we
reached
out
by
email
to
the
fair
oaks
manhattan
manor,
neighborhood
association,
we
did
not
have
any
feedback
from
them.
We
also
reached
out
to
than
and
the
neighboring
association,
which
is
a
bayside
west,
neighborhood
association,
which
is
on
the
other
side
of
manhattan,
and
they
did
not
have
any
objections
to
this
request.
S
We
believe
that
the
planning
commission
and
your
staff
had
have
identified
the
ways
in
which
this
project
meets
the
comprehensive
plan
and
your
code,
including
encouraging
residential
on
vacant
and
underutilized
lands
in
a
mix
of
housing
types
adjacent
to
transit.
We
are
very
proud
of
this
rezoning
request
and
we
respectfully
request
your
approval
and
further.
We
agree
with
the
changes
on
the
revision
sheet
and
again,
we
are
available
for
any
questions.
A
G
N
I'm
number
12
file,
number
r
e
z,
21-123
moving
orders
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration,
enormous
rezoning
property
and
the
general
vicinity
of
4510
south
manhattan
avenue
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
districts,
classification,
rs,
60,
residential
single
family
and
cg
commercial
general
to
pd
plan
development.
Residential
single
family
attached,
providing
an
effective
date
applicant
has
met
the
consistent
with
the
land
use
objectives
9.2,
which
is
intended
to
ensure
that
there's
adequate
amount
of
land
planned
for
residential
purposes
to
accommodate
the
projected
population.
N
N
N
Carlson
and
goods-
yes,
motion
care,
recall,
says,
abstaining
second
reading
and
adoption
will
be
held
on
march
3rd
at
9
30
a.m.
Thank
you,
council.
Thank
you.
Miss
kirk,
all
right
final
swing
of
the
bat
number
13
for
tonight.
N
Stanley,
collins
with
your
planet,
commission
staff,
have
been
sworn
in.
Our
last
case
is
in
the
south,
south
tampa
planning
district,
more
specifically
in
the
redwood
park.
Neighborhood
all
right.
This
this
case
is
within
the
central
tampa
planet
district.
N
The
closest
public
recreation
facility
is
phil's
park,
which
is
located
approximately
a
quarter
mile
to
the
eastern
subject
site.
So
I'm
excited
in
the
is
located
at
level
b.
Evacuation
zone
subject:
study
is
located
within
proximity
to
transit.
Several
stops
located
along
west
columbus
drive
this
westbound
list
portion
of
west
palm
beach
drive.
It
is
served
by
heart
route,
15,
providing
connection
to
west
shore,
east
tampa
and
the
net
park
transport
center.
N
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
the
surrounding
properties,
it's
generally
located
on
the
south
side
of
west
columbus
drive
and
just
to
the
west
of
north
poplar
avenue.
N
The
surrounding
area
is
predominantly
residential
and
character.
There
are
detached
single
family
residents
to
the
north
east
southwest
of
the
subject
site.
N
This
designation
allows
low
density
residential
development
up
to
10
units
period.
Final
commission
staff
reviewed
the
application
and
found
no
adverse
impacts
of
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
This
portion
of
west
columbus
drive
between
essex
port
and
north
poplar
avenue
has
an
existing
density
of
7.02
units
per
acre.
Existing
density
is
approximately
70
percent
of
the
allowable
density
as
planned
under
the
presidential
10
future
land
use.
N
Designation
requests
would
allow
for
the
consideration
of
two
single-family
detached
residences
at
an
overall
density
of
6.6
units
per
acre,
which
is
consistent
with
the
density
anticipated
under
the
residential
10
future
land
use
designation.
It
is
also
below
the
existing
density
along
that
segment
of
columbus.
N
Furthermore,
the
proposed
request
would
allow
for
a
similar
development
form
height
scale
to
the
surrounding
residential
uses,
followed
along
as
portion
of
west
form
described.
The
proposed
rezoning
supports
many
of
the
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plan
as
it
relates
to
housing's
population.
N
Based
on
these
considerations,
planning
commission
staff
finds
the
request
consistent
with
the
city
of
tampa
plan.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
I'm
available
for
any
questions
equals
with
god
all
right,
jay
thanks
so
much
zane
hussain
development
coordination
case
raz
21-12,
the
applicant
and
representative,
is
kevin
robles
for
the
address
at
824
west
columbus
drive.
N
N
And
going
to
the
overhead
survey
you'll
see
the
two
lots.
Also
as
we
go
to
the
overhead
view.
Ariel
you'll
see
the
lot
out
here
outlined
in
red,
with
west
columbus
drive
to
the
north
west
amelia
avenue
to
the
south,
to
the
east.
You
have
north
boulevard
up
and
down,
and
the
hillsborough
river
running
to
the
west.
N
The
site
developed
the
site
currently
has
development
of
a
one
single
family
dwelling
unit
on
the
property
property
located
to
the
north
is
zone
rs
50.
with
single
family
homes
on
it
to
west,
south
and
east.
Also,
you
have
single
family
homes,
but
in
rs
60,
all
with
single-family
home
residential.
What's
on
them,
as
you
come
to
the
conforming
map
here,.
N
As
I
went
out
to
the
site,
you
can
see
what
is
currently
residing
the
one
single
family
home
to
the
north
of
the
site.
You
can
see
that
they
are
developing
more
single-family
homes
to
the
north,
to
the
northwest.
Now
sorry
northwest
of
the
site,
you
can
see
more
single-family
homes
up
and
down
the
street,
to
the
west,
more
single-family
homes
and
to
the
east
of
the
site,
again
more
single-family
homes
up
and
down
the
street.
N
N
Good
evening,
council
kevin
robles
2107
chestnut
forest
drive.
I
have
been
sworn
I'd
like
to
thank
staff
for
their
comprehensive
report.
I
have
nothing
to
add:
we'll
make
this
a
twitter,
rezone
and
I'll.
Do
it
200
words
or
less
any
questions.
N
N
N
This
miss
miranda,
I'm
looking
at
the
plat
map
edition.
It
says
michigan
yeah.
When
did
that
change.
Michigan
was
before
columbus
drive.
When
did
it
change
yeah
in
your
lifetime?
No,
it
was
just
before
somewhere
in
the
40s.
I
think
it
was.
The
italians
got
hold
of
it
and
made
it
columbus.
I
think
columbus
got
a
hold
of
it
all
right,
nothing
more!
I
saw
that
40s,
this
guy
man
all
right
more
gloves,
mr
thankful,
mr
maniscalco.
N
Motion
granted
no
racist
speakers.
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank
you
man,
mr
bear.
Can
you
close
this
out,
sir,
with
great
pleasure,
I
move
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration:
an
ordinance,
rezoning
property
in
a
general
vicinity
of
824
west
columbus
drive
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida,
more
particularly
described
in
section
1
from
zoning
district
classification,
rs,
60,
residential
single
family
to
rs,
50,
residential
single
family,
providing
an
effective
date.
N
Second,
but
I
have
mr
maniscalco
rocco
vieira:
yes,
sietra,
yes,
miranda,
yes,
dingfelder,
yes,
carlson,
yes,
maniscaco
and
goods.
Yes,
motion
carry
unanimously.
Second
reading
and
adoption
will
be
held
on
march
third
at
9
30
a.m.
Thank
you,
council
good
night.
Thank
you,
gentlemen.
If
you
can
look
at
the
clock,
your
watches,
we
have
15
items
good
night,
mr
rebels.
N
If
you
look,
a
couple
of
those
items
could
have
been
very
very
long
if
they
would
have
been
hurt
tonight.
This
could
be
rare,
but
one
o'clock
night
tonight
look
what
we
talked
about
again.
They
stacked
the
deck
again
with
15
items
tonight,
everyone's
dragging
everybody's
heads
down.
So
I
just
want
us
to
be
mindful
and
say
I'll,
be
mindful
that
we
got
to
kind
of
stick
to
what
we
said:
we're
going
to
do
with
these
items,
because
this
this
could
have
been
a
very,
very
much
longer
night.
N
Mr
vera,
you
have
anything
sure
I
got
a
couple.
If
I
may,
staff
is
requesting
a
continuance
of
one
month
on
the
returning
citizens
ordinance.
We
just
have
a
lot
going
on.
If
I
may,
I'm
going
to
move
it
from
next
week
to
march
17th
under
regular
sessions,
which
one
a
returning
citizen's
ordinance
on
giving
contractors,
incentives
to
ban
the
box
and
and
hire
returning
citizens
all
right,
motivate.
Mr
vieira
second.
N
Then,
if
I
may,
I
want
to
do
a
commendation
to
be
presented
on
april
12
to
mr
warren
hope,
dawson,
for
what
I
believe
is
going
to
be
55
years
as
a
florida
bar
member
he's
the
first
african
american
assistant
city
attorney,
and
he
recently
released
his
memoirs.
N
So
all
right,
second
by
mr
dean,
fellow
favorite,
all
right,
they
pulled
motion
granted
and
then.
Lastly,
if
I
may,
I
motion
for
the
to
bring
back,
I
know
gosh.
Maybe
two
weeks
ago,
council
voted
down
second
reading
on
the
attendance
bill
of
rights
ordinance
I
motioned
for
that
to
return
on
february
10
2022
for
reconsideration
and
and
if
I
may,
for
I,
I'm
not
looking.
N
Oh
I'm
sorry
next
week
next
week,
yeah
no
not
tonight
not
tonight,
that's
what
I
was
about
to
say
is:
I'm
merely
motioning
it
to
have
it
return
for
reconsideration
next
week
without
dealing
with
the
merits
of
it,
etc.
Just
I
think
that
it's
something
that
we
should
reconsider.
As
the
tampa
city
council.
I
think
it
certainly
makes
sense.
N
I
would
have
supported
if
I
was
there
and
that's
why
I
feel
a
duty
to
bring
it
up
myself,
because
I
was
not
there
and-
and
I
do
think
that
we
should
further
discuss
this.
So
if
I
may,
I
motion
to
have
it
come
back
for
next
week.
N
Yes,
sir
mm-hmm,
mr
recognized
okay,
just
as
a
point
of
order,
you
thought
the
respect,
mr
very
you
weren't
on
the
prevalence
you
weren't
here,
but
with
that
I
will
replace
you
with
that
motion
and
I'll
be
the
maker
of
the
motion,
because
I
was
on
the
prevailing
side
and
and
and
if
you
want
to
bring
it
back,
then
we
should
bring
it
back,
but
just
for
the
record
we
should
dot
our
eyes
and
cross
our
teeth.
N
N
Martin
shelby
city
council
attorney
what
councilman
vieira
was
asking
to
do
was
to
have
it
placed
on
next
week's
agenda
for
a
motion
to
reconsider,
and
if
that
motion
was
in
order
would
have
to
be
by
somebody
on
the
prevailing
side.
Again,
it's
not
to
bring
back
the
ordinance
in
its
current
form,
but
what
it
is
is
to
take
up
the
reconsideration
and
then
from
there.
We
have
to
go
through
the
process
because
the
ordinance
was
on
second
reading.
N
So
what
that
would
mean
is
if
council
did
choose
to
reconsider
it
and
they
chose
to
bring
the
ordinance
back.
It
would
have
to
come
back
for
first
reading
consideration
and
go
through
the
process
that
florida
statutes
requires
for
the
adoption
of
an
ordinance.
N
So
so
so
his
his
motion
tonight
is
to
put
it
on
next
week's
agenda
and
again,
mr
dingfelder,
you
could
make
that
motion
at
the
time
because
you
would
have
to
be
on
the
prevailing
side.
That's
true,
and-
and
if
I
may,
mr
chairman
you'll,
recognize
that
so
maybe
then
next
week,
if
one
of
the
members
who
voted
against
it
wants
to
support
it,
then
they
can
make
that
motion
correct
next
week.
N
N
So
this
is
sort
of
a
just
a
new
motion,
a
new
motion
to
just
put
it
on
the
agenda
for
discussion.
Yes,
sir,
yes
for
reconsideration
right
yeah
for
for
for
consideration
to
have
it
voted
again.
I
guess
we'd
have
to
go
through
first
and
then
second
reading
on
it
and
of
course
there
will
be
a
robust
discussion
on
it,
etcetera,
etcetera
that
that's
that's
all
contemplated
with
possible
amendments,
right,
of
course
yeah
whatever.
N
Whatever
is
the
will
of
counsel,
of
course,
whatever
the
majority
is
yes,
sir,
mr
cost,
you
recognize
I
can
propose
an
amendment
or
just
a
suggestion
that
mr
dingfelder
has
has
expertise
in
as
a
former
civil
rights
attorney,
and
he
had
some
concerns
about
the
way
this
was
written
and
I
would
request
that
staff
meet
with
him
in
the
interim
to
work
out
those
because
if,
if
they
don't
work
out
some
modifications
based
on
that
I'll
vote,
no
again,
so
I
I
would
like
to
see
a
tweet
to
it
and
maybe
that's
after
we
vote
next
week,
but
yeah.
N
If
it's
just
the
same
thing
coming
up
again,
we
might
have
the
same
result
and
I
think
the
community
wants
something,
but
but
we
shouldn't
pass
an
ordinance
that
that
has
bad
language
in
it.
If
we
can
modify
it,
thank
you.
If
may
I,
mr
chair,
you
recognize
thank
you,
sir,
and
and
and
that's
something
I
would
suggest
to
discuss
next
week.
I
would
think
I'm
just
trying
to
bring
it
back.
N
My
intent
is
to
bring
it
back,
as
is
if
the
majority
of
council
members
wish
to
make
the
revisions
on
it.
We
can
take
votes
on
it,
but
my
intent
is
to
bring
it
back.
It
is,
as
is
that's
my
personal
intent,
but
for
purposes
of
this
motion,
I'm
merely
having
it
back
for
our
consideration
and
scrutiny.
I
guess,
if
you
will?
Yes
all
right,
you
beat
me
to
it,
mr
beer,
because
I
was
going
to
ask
what
to
come
back
as
well,
but
you
beat
me
to
the
punch.
N
N
If
the
amendments
need
to
be
made
with
the
thing
for
I'm
hoping
that
we
can
come
to
a
meeting,
so
we
can
get
something
because
something
does
need
to
be
done
because
there
is
some
things
going
on
and
we
do
need
to
address
within
the
city
motion
was
seconded
by
mr
maniscalco.
All
in
favor
question
you
recognized,
okay,
I
I
I
had
my
aide
send
to
your
aides
in
a
uni-directional
fashion
and
I
copy
mr
shelby
and
the
clerk
and
the
city
attorney's
office,
the
section
eight
requirements.
N
Okay,
so
just
please
read,
I'm
not
just
don't
want
an
answer.
Obviously,
but
that'd
be
a
violation,
sunshine,
but
just
read
those
section:
eight
inspection
requirements,
there's
18
pages
of
inspections
and
and
and
yes,
I'm
offered
to
the
discussion
I'd
like
to
us
to
adopt
something,
I'm
just
not
sure
we
need
to
totally
copy
what
the
county
commission
did.
I
understand
st
pete
rejected
that
second
part.
By
the
way,
I
understand
all
right.
The
second
miss
manuscript
I'll
call
a
favor.
N
Any
polls
motion
ground
anything
else,
sir.
That's
it
yes,
ma'am,
yes
for
vieira's
accommodation.
Was
there
a
date
for
that?
For
mr
dawson
that
was
april
12th
fort
sumter,
thank
you
all
right
anything
else,
sir.
Oh,
that's
it!
Thank
you,
mr
alco.
Thank
you
very
much.
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
for
dr
wade
weaver
an
oncologist
with
florida
cancer
specialist
to
give
a
10-minute
presentation
on
march
8th
regarding
march
being
colon
cancer
awareness
month
and
the
importance
of
getting
screened
I'll.
N
Second,
that
if
I
made
I'm
taken
by
mr
avira,
all
in
favor
aye
all
right,
you
oppose
motion
granted,
that's
it
and
it
may
I
I
mean
not
not
to
belabor
a
point.
I
wanted
to
thank
you
for
that
councilman
my
grandfather.
My
father's
father
died
in
1988
colon
cancer
and
I
get
screened
every
five
to
seven
years,
so
it
does
run
in
my
family
and
it's
such
a
pivotal
issue.
So
thank
you
for
that.
Mr
carlson.
N
Yes,
two
please,
this
morning,
you'll
remember
cra
instructed
me
to
bring
up
the
the
motion
tonight
about
the
the
veteran
memorial
statue
at
tampa
union
station.
So
I'll
restate
the
same
motion
with
the
words
moved
around
a
little
bit
that
that
the
public
art
staff
be
asked
to
meet
with
the
cra
community
advisory
committee,
friends
of
tampa
union
station
and
gary
mormino
to
discuss
the
possibility
of
creating
a
veteran
memorial
statue
at
tampa
union
station
further
to
report
recommended
budget
and
approach
at
the
april.
N
21
2022
meeting
at
nine
am
second
by
mr
dean
fell
all
in
favor
all
right.
Any
opposed
motion
granted
the
other
one,
and
let
me
know
you
guys,
can
stop
me
if
you
think
this
one's
too
hot
to
handle,
and
I
apologize
for
springing
it.
The
the
hannah
avenue
project
has
has
just
gotten
all
kinds
of
negative
feedback,
and
the
community
is
mad.
The
the
you
know,
companies
are
mad.
N
Media
is
mad.
Activists
on
all
fronts
are
mad.
The
tambay
times
this
afternoon
wrote
a
scathing
editorial
about
it
and,
by
the
time
we
meet
again,
this
thing
will
continue
to
get
bigger,
and
so
we,
I
think,
we've
got
something
coming
back
in
march
or
april,
which
could,
but
I
think,
let
me
just
try
this
and
see
what
happens
I
and
and
by
the
way,
the
with
all
due
respect
to
the
companies
that
got
the
contract
it.
N
The
the
process,
whatever
it
was,
was
the
fault
of
staff,
not
not
the
not
the
companies
that
got
it,
and
I
think
it's
the
way
these
things
were
handled
in
the
past,
but
anyway,
here's
my
motion
to
ask
staff
to
report
to
council
on
february
17th
about
our
options
for
rescinding
or
reversing
council's
prior
vote
to
approve
the
hannah
avenue
city
center
project,
while
ensuring
that
current
vendors
are
fairly
compensated.
N
My
understanding
is
that
we
were
looking
into
what
happened
more,
that
I
I
didn't
know
that
it
went
so
far
as
to
say
we
send
a
reverse
okay.
Well,
no,
it
doesn't
seem
really.
Quite
it
asked
him.
It
asked
for
legal
to
tell
us
what
happened
so
forth,
but
I
mean,
would
you
would
you
rather
have
it
all
on
the
third?
N
I
I
ideally
would
do
it
all
at
once,
but
this
is
moving
really
quickly
in
the
community
and
it
seems
to
me
that
it
would
be
better
to
have
at
least
at
least
a
short
brief
on
what
we
can
and
can't
do
legally,
because
I
guarantee
you
go
ahead
and
we'll
ask
you
move
to
the
third,
but
we
can
go
along
with
it,
but
I
can
ask
you
if
you
all,
if
you
all,
don't
want
to
do
it,
that's
fine!
N
N
I
I
got
a
question
if
I
may-
and
this
is
but
may
I
I'll
second
them
and
and
and
I
have
no
problem
with
getting
information
on
this-
absolutely
no
problem,
but
I
have
a
question-
and
I
and
I
do
not
want
a
discussion
on
this
because
you
talk
about
another
can
of
worms.
Are
we
voting
next
week
on
the
police?
Chief?
Yes,
okay,
I'm
sure
I'm
sure
that's
probably
going
to
come
up
to
be
on
the
agenda
for
next
week.
So
that's
probably
going
to
be
a
hot
topic
all
day
long.
N
The
phones,
I'm
just
saying:
that's
why
yeah
yeah
yeah
it
might
not
it
might
not.
You
know,
let's
cross
it.
Oh
I
mean
again
all
day
I'll
support
it
all
support
councilman
carlson's
motion.
I
have
no
problem
with
getting
information,
but
I
just
say:
traffic
yeah.
Beware:
how
about
it?
Well!
24Th
is
a
workshop.
Do
you
want
to
do
it
on
that
day
or?
N
Mr
chairman,
ms
wells
is
looking
to
be
recognized
please
this
is
awesome.
This
was
recognized.
Thank
you.
There
are
two
separate
council
motions
scheduled
for
discussion
on
the
hannah
project
during
your
meeting
on
march
3rd,
and
I
would
recommend
to
the
extent
you
want
additional
items
addressed
that
you
place
them
on
that
same
day.
To
try
and
add
this
to
the
february
24th
workshop,
you
have
a
very
heavy
workshop
that
is
dedicated
to
a
lot
of
land
use
issues.
You
said
march
3rd,
yeah
march
3rd.
N
You
have
two
separate
motions,
all
ready
all
right.
I
would
propose
I'll
just
state
it
again
move
to
ask
staff
to
report
to
council
on
march
3rd
about
our
options
for
rescinding
or
reversing
council's
prior
vote
to
approve
the
hannah
avenue
city
center
project,
while
ensuring
that
current
vendors
are
fairly
compensated,
and
that
includes
legal
staff.
N
N
All
right,
I've
got
two
one
is
from
the
planning
commission
a
motion
to
set
an
adoption
hearing
for
tacpa
21-31
tacpa
21-32
tacpa
21-33
on
april
28,
2022
at
501
pm
and
directing
the
legal
department
to
provide
the
city
clerk
with
the
form
of
notice
for
advertising.
The
these
public
hearings,
all
right,
second
by
mr
maniscalco,
all
in
favor
any
opposed
ocean
granted
anything
else.
Sir.
Yes,
sir.
N
Include
a
discussion
of
possible
changes
to
chapter
27,
urgent
and
immediate
changes
to
chapter
27
as
related
to
affordable
housing
number
one
and
number
two
to
address
the
recommendations
that
were
brought
forth
by
the
ahak
committee:
capital
ahac,
the
ahak
committee.
That
included
many
recommendations
as
related
to
chapter
27.
N
N
I
got
five
of
them
day.
Okay,
we
did
have
some
receiving
five
items,
for
it
was
on
our
special
call
me
on
tuesday,
but
need
to
be
filed
today.
Second,
all
right
motion
receiving
file.