►
From YouTube: TCC 7/21/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
C
C
E
E
E
E
You
very
much
councilman
Vieira
is
going
to
be
about
30
minutes
later
he
had
some
prior
and
gay.
He
had
a
prior
engagement
that
he
had
to
attend
to
our
city.
Council
attorney
is
out
this
evening
and
Mr
Morris
Massey
will
be
filling
in
Mr
Massey.
If
you
could
give
us
the.
F
Direction
regarding
public
comment
tonight:
yes,
sir,
this
is
the
July
21st
2022
evening
meeting
in
the
Tampa
City
Council
here
in
city
council
chambers,
in
the
third
floor
of
All
City
Hall
315,
East,
Kennedy
Boulevard
in
Tampa
Florida.
The
public
is
able
to
attend
this
meeting
in
person
or
view
it
by
cable,
television
on
Spectrum
channels,
640
or
Frontier,
channel
15
or
by
the
internet
at
www.tampa.gov
live
stream.
F
The
public
is
also
able
to
participate
in
this
meeting
either
here
in
person
in
city
council
chambers
are
virtually
by
way
of
communication,
media
technology
or
CMT.
However,
the
use
of
CMT
does
require
pre-registration
with
the
city
clerk's
office.
Directions
for
pre-registration
are
included
in
the
notice
of
the
meeting
and
on
the
agenda.
F
Also,
if
the
matter
is
quasi-judicial
such
as
a
rezoning
or
a
special
use
public
hearing,
the
members
of
the
public
may
still
participate
remotely
via
CMT
that
cell
phones
and
smartphones
are
not
compatible
as
they
will
not
allow
your
camera.
When
connected,
you
must
have
access
to
a
CMT
device
such
as
a
tablet
or
computer
equipped
with
a
camera
and
a
microphone
that
will
enable
you
to
be
able
to
be
seen
and
heard
by
city
council
and
all
other
participants
in
the
quasi-judicial
matter.
Because
can
I.
Please
have
a
motion
waiting.
The
city
council
standard.
E
E
G
Good
evening
Annie
Barnes
development
coordination,
I
do
have
a
few
items
to
clean
up
before
you
tonight
off
the
agenda
item
number
three
is
ab2
2132.
The
petition
was
not
properly
noticed.
Can
you
please
remove
this
item
from
the
agenda.
E
G
E
G
E
You
motion
made
by
councilman
matiscalco
seconded
by
councilman
Goose,
all
in
favor.
C
I
E
Have
motion
made
by
councilman
Miranda
seconded
by
councilman
Goods,
all
in
favor
any
opposed.
Thank
you
good.
G
E
E
E
D
Good
evening,
chairman
and
Council
lashon
dock
development,
coordination
and
Council,
the
first
item
on
this
evening's
agenda
is
Rez
2187.
This
is
an
area
rezoning
I
want
to
show
you
on
the
camera,
just
the
area
contained
within
this
request,
just
because
of
the
size
of
the
request.
So
the
request
is
to
rezone
the
property
from
PDA
CI,
commercial,
intensive,
r01
residential
office,
RS,
60,
residential
single
family,
CG,
commercial,
General,
rm24
residential
multi-family
to
PDA.
D
So
the
area
under
this
request
is
outlined
is
has
the
green
shading
to
orient
you?
This
is
North
Boulevard.
This
is
Ross
to
the
north.
This
is
Highland
Avenue
and
then
this
is
Tampa
street.
So
this
request
currently
has
the
zoning
of
PDA
Central
to
the
site.
The
request
before
you
tonight
is
to
bring
in
this
parcel
identified
as
trike
1B
on
the
site
plan,
this
parcel,
which
is
identified
as
trike
1C,
and
then
this
parcel
track.
Three,
the
rest
of
the
property
is
already
Zone
PDA.
D
J
Good
evening
Council
this
is
Danny
Collins,
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff.
I've
been
sworn
in.
Our
first
case
is
within
the
central
Tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically
within
the
Tampa
Heights
Urban
Village,
and
it's
shown
here
on
our
vision,
map
subjects
site
is
within
the
Cosi
Hazard
area
and
portions
of
the
site
are
within
the
level
a
evacuation.
J
Zone
Transit
surfaces
provide
it
both
along
North,
Tampa,
Street
and
North
Boulevard
heart
routes,
one
six
and
seven
connect
the
subject's
site
to
downtown
Tampa,
Marion
Transit,
Center,
Hillsborough,
County,
Community,
College
University,
the
university
area
and
also
net
Park.
The
net
Park
Transfer
Center.
J
J
The
surrounding
area
contains
a
mixture
of
uses.
Commercial
uses
are
found
generally
found
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site
along
North
Tampa
Street,
while
residential
uses
are
located
predominantly
to
the
west
and
north
of
the
subject
site.
The
Pearl
apartment
mixed-use
development
is
to
the
north
of
the
subject
site.
J
The
subject
site
is
recognized
under
the
under
four
future:
land
use
designations,
a
majority
of
the
subject's
site
is
recognized
under
the
rmu
100
designation,
approximately
14.75
acres
are
recognized
under
the
residential
35,
designation
and
1.46
acres
are
recognized
under
the
cc35
designation.
The
remaining
portions
of
the
site
are
recognized
under
the
Ros
designation,
and
that
is
shown
here
on
our
on
our
map.
J
The
applicant
is
utilizing
land
use
policy
5.1.6
as
noted
on
the
site
plan
to
blend
the
density
intensity
throughout
the
entire
site,
the
surrounding
areas
Urban
and
character,
with
rmu
hundreds
and
cc35
designated
Parcels
to
the
south
and
east
of
the
subject
site
and
R35
and
r-10
designator
Parcels
to
the
north
of
the
site.
There
is
also
an
r10
neighborhood,
generally
West
and
Northwest
of
the
subject
site.
The
applicant
is
requesting
approval
through
this
rezoning
petition
to
add
an
additional
parcel
that
was
a
previously
approved
in
rezoning
through
rezoning.
J
18-119
changes
include
adding
additional
square
footage
to
the
general
office,
used
an
additional
30,
000
square
foot,
commercial,
retail,
a
change
in
the
number
of
allowable
hotel
rooms
and
an
increase
in
allowable
square
footage
for
the
recreation
facility.
Commercial
use.
The
proposed
additional
uses
will
continue
to
provide
for
a
mixed
use
development
pattern
as
encouraged
through
the
comprehensive
plan
policies.
The
proposed
planum
plan
development,
alternative
District
also
contains
design
guidelines
providing
for
an
urban
style
development
with
buildings
placed
close
to
the
public,
sidewalk
activate
a
ground
for
uses
and
structured
parking.
J
The
comprehensive
plan
is
supportive
of
a
design
pattern
that
promotes
walking
and
Transit
uses,
which
is
supported
by
this
plan.
The
PDA
also
includes
26
2650
square
feet
of
residential
development,
which
is
consistent
with
the
compact
City
form
strategy
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
Overall,
the
the
proposed
PDA
will
complement
the
existing
development
found
on
site
and
is
compatible
and
consistent
with
a
long-range
development
pattern
and
courage
on
this
portion
of
the
Tampa
Heights
neighborhood
and
through
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan
based
on
these
considerations.
J
D
Thank
you
so
much
Council
LaShawn
dock
again
with
development
coordination
and
Council
Danny
is
presented
to
you
the
information
as
far
as
the
proximity
and
location
of
the
site.
So
the
request
be
for
you
is
a
request
for
a
PDA
and
just
to
give
Council
a
brief
overview.
A
PDA,
if
you
may
recall,
is
a
plan
which
will
be
provided
to
you,
which
outlines
the
boundary
of
the
project
area
and,
typically
in-
and
in
this
case
it
is
a
phase
development.
D
There
is
an
entitlements
table
which
is
included
as
a
part
of
the
site
plan
package
that
entitlements
table
determines
the
entitlements
allowed
and
the
square
footage
is
allowed
for
each
use
requested.
So,
as
the
development
comes
in
for
phase
development,
they
would
submit
for
incremental
site
plan
review
at
the
time
of
review.
It
must
be
consistent
with
the
overall
PDA,
as
approved
by
by
Council,
and
so
that,
on
this
particular
request,
the
property
has
the
PDA
zoning
on
the
property.
D
Again,
the
PDA
and
then
the
areas
that
are
added,
which
is
track,
1B
tracked
1C
and
track
three
total,
approximately
4.7
Acres.
So
this
request
would
add
that
4.7
acres
to
what
exists
for
a
total
of
approximately
53
000
53
Acres,
not
Thousand,
Acres,
I'm,
sorry,
and
what
I
wanted
to
do
was
to
provide
you
with
the
site
plan
just
to
show
you
the
tracks
as
they
are
identified
on
the
plan.
D
So
this
is
the
boundary.
This
is
North
Boulevard.
This
is
Palm
which
runs
through
the
site.
This
is
Tampa
Street,
and
so
this
is
the
West
piece
which
is
track
1B
and
then
I
strike
1C
at
Highland,
which
is
at
the
roundabout
on
the
northwest
corner,
and
then
that's
track
three
on
the
east
side
of
Tampa.
D
Then
they
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
entitlements
on
the
property.
So
I
just
want
to
show
you
just
what
the
difference
is.
Their
current
approval,
which
was
granted
in
2018.,
allows
for
the
uses
of
multi-family
general
office,
Marina
retail,
Hotel,
theater
and
Commercial
Recreational
facility.
So
what
I
provided
is
the
current
approval
from
2018
and
then
the
data
for
what's
proposed
and
then
the
difference
in
the
unit.
D
So
in
some
cases
for
the
multi-family
there's
an
increase
in
units,
but
you'll
see
that
general
office
has
decreased
along
with
the
retail
component
and
then
in
some
there's,
no
change
proposed,
but
there's
still
permitted
uses.
So
there
are
no
additional
uses
added
to
this
request.
D
So
the
the
Heights
Community
design
standards
runs
with
this
rezoning
and
this
was
updated
along
with
the
PDA.
So
any
development
that
is
submitted
must
comply
with
those
standards
they're.
On
page
three
of
the
staff
report,
there
is
a
table
which
outlines
the
maximum
building
Heights
and
also
the
yards
for
each
phase
of
development.
D
D
This
is
Ola
Highland
and
then
this
is
Tampa
Street.
So
this
is
the
other
parcelon
Highland.
This
is
the
parcel
east
of
Tampa
street,
so
you
can
see
along
Tampa
street.
It's
predominantly
commercial.
Zoning
with
CG
and
CI,
you
have
your
rm24
to
the
north
and
your
residential
single
family,
the
rs60
to
the
west
and
the
river
is
to
the
South.
D
D
D
And
that's
also
the
West
End
of
the
site.
This
is
located
west
of
the
site.
This
is
residential
single
family
on
Ridgewood.
D
This
is
north
of
the
site.
I
have
a
couple
of
pictures
North,
as
we
work
our
way:
East
who's,
a
residential
Homes
located
there.
This
is
more
Central
to
the
site.
This
is
strike
two
looking
South,
here's
a
view
of
Armature
Works
part
of
track
two,
and
this
is
another
end
as
we're
heading
East
on
the
site.
This
is
the
site
which
is
identified
as
track
1C.
So
this
is
one
of
the
additional
sites
added
that's
at
Highland
in
Palm.
D
D
And
the
development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
petition.
We
find
a
request
inconsistent.
There
is
a
finding
from
natural
resources
which
is
contained
within
your
staff
report.
We
have
also
here
just
to
speak
on
the
BLC
in
their
finding
Dennis
Fernandez
is
here
he
is
historic.
D
Preservation
manager,
so
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
the
dentist
in
just
a
second
for
him
to
review
the
BLC
findings
and
then
we'll
turn
it
over
to
Aaron
Mayer
she's,
our
Forester
examiner,
and
she
will
review
with
you
the
trees
that
are
mostly
located
on
the
west
side
of
the
parcel
on
that
track.
1B
and
discuss
that
with
you.
If
Council
grants
the
request
and
approves
the
application,
there
are
revisions
required
between
first
and
second
reading
and
I.
Have
a
revision
sheet
also
included
so
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
Dennis.
B
Good
evening,
council
members,
Dennis
Fernandez
architecture,
review
and
historic
preservation
manager,
as
lashon
did
mention
the
portion
of
the
PDA
on
the
easternmost.
B
B
At
its
meeting
of
July,
the
11th
2022
The
Arc
voted
to
recommend
approval
of
the
site
plan
and
PDA,
as
presented
at
the
public
hearing.
There
were
some
conditions
on
that.
First
condition
was
that
waiver
number
73
be
stricken
from
the
site
plan.
That
waiver
did
delegate
request
to
delegate
the
architecture
review
component
of
the
process
to
the
staff
instead
of
the
arc
commission
itself,
which
is
contradictory
to
the
language
of
the
code.
The
code
does
require
that
new
construction
of
this
scope
does
be
reviewed
before
the
arcade
of
public
hearing.
B
The
second
waiver
is
a
little
bit
more
complex.
I
have
a
visual
to
assist
with
that.
B
The
Arc
did
motion
that
the
maximum
height
of
the
new
structure
not
exceed
45
feet
from
the
adjacent
corners
of
the
historic
structures,
so
that
would
be
they
were
seeking
to
have
some
separation
between
the
back
of
the
Free
Library
and
the
the
or
the
side
of
the
Free
Library
in
the
back
of
the
giant
oil
building.
So
they
did
request
that
this
section
identified
in
Blue
on
this
exhibit
is
at
45
feet
and
they
then
did
specify
that
the
rest
of
the
structure
not
exceed
686
feet.
B
So
that
would
be
the
remainder
of
the
site
not
exceed
86
feet,
and
that
motion
was
approved
by
the
board
by
a
vote
of
five
to
one
I
believe
the
agent
is
going
to
be
discussing
those
conditions
and
how
they
tend
to
either
comply
with
them
or
provide
an
alternative.
And
that
concludes
my
presentation.
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
K
All
right,
hi,
Council
good
evening,
I'm
Aaron,
Mayer
I,
am
with
development
coordination.
I
have
been
sworn
and
I'm
a
Forester
examiner
with
natural
resources
and
I
have
reviewed
the
site
plan
for
natural
resources,
reasonings
I'm,
going
to
show
you
an
overview
of
the
site
using
dark,
Moss's
arborist
survey,
so
the
applicant
natural
resources
was
inconsistent
based
on
the
number
of
grand
trees
that
were
proposed
to
be
removed,
which
was
six
non-hazardous,
grand
trees.
K
You
see
those
do
you
see
the
proposed
removals
in
the
red
x's
on
the
site
plan
and
just
to
orient
you
looking
at
this
is
tract
1B.
This
is
west
of
North
Boulevard,
so
we're
we're
looking
at
just
this
tract
for
with
these
trees,
you'll
see
with
the
green
little
Cloud
looking
icons.
Those
are
the
trees
that
are
proposed
to
be
retained.
Up
here
to
the
north
eastern
corner,
you
have
the
Grove
of
trees,
that's
like
a
bunch
of
grand
trees
and
one
little
Clump
that
the
applicant
is
proposing.
K
In
addition,
natural
resources
believes
that
three
additional
Grand
trees
could
be
saved,
based
on
their
condition
and
based
on
their
location
on
the
site
and
the
fact
that
this
is
a
vacant
a
vacant
site.
So
you
can
see
those
in
the
purple
circles.
Those
are
the
three
trees
they're
tree
number
five
number
nine
and
number
14.
and
I'm
just
going
to
go
through
each
one
of
these
trees.
I'll
show
you
a
picture
explaining
a
little
bit
about
them
and
show
you
on
the
map,
where
they're
located.
K
So
this
is
tree
number
five.
This
is
a
32
inch
diameter
at
breast
height
Live
Oak.
The
tree
rating
is
a
B6
and
let
me
just
tell
you
what
a
rating
is
a
rating.
Is
the
city
uses
the
Matheny
and
Clark
evaluation,
so
the
letters
can
range
from
a
through
f
a
meaning.
There
are
no
apparent
problems,
F
being
the
tree
is
dead,
so
the
numbers
can
range
from
a
three
through
a
twelve
twelve
being
much
worse
in
terms
of
failure,
potential
size
and
defective
part
and
the
target
rating.
K
So
this
is
tree
number
five.
It's
a
live
oak,
rated
B6,
so
a
very
good
rating
and
19
debits
means
that
the
tree
is
worth
19
two
and
a
half
inch
caliber
trees.
According
to
our
tree
table
calculations,
which
is
based
on
Crown,
spread
species
rating
and
condition
rating.
This
is
looking
South
down
cruzicade
and
you
can
see
the
tree
right
here
on
the
right
and
then
again
this
is
tree.
Five!
K
That's
the
tree!
I
just
showed
you.
We
believe
this
tree
could
be
preserved,
based
on
its
proximal
location,
to
The
Grove
of
trees
that
are
already
being
preserved.
For
this
for
this
project
tree
number,
nine
is
right
here.
K
Tree
number:
nine
is
a
40
inch
diameter
at
breast
height
Live
Oak
tree
is
rated
B4
and
it
is
worth
16
trees,
mitigation,
trees.
This
is
looking
West
from
cruzicades,
so
you
would
be
stayed
standing
facing
the
tree
and
again,
given
this
tree's
condition
and
its
location
right
here
and
the
fact
that
this
is
a
vacant
site.
We
believe
this
tree
could
be
preserved
and
the
last
tree
is
tree
number
14.,
which
is
right
here.
This
is
a
54
inch
diameter
at
breast
height
liveo
rated
B4,
and
it
is
worth
almost
40
mitigation
trees.
K
E
E
K
E
L
One
other
question
paper
May
one
question:
please,
the
chairman
asked
some
questions
and
I
understand
the
conversation,
I
hope
and
but
out
of
all
trees
that
are
planted
not
only
in
this
site
that
are
replaced
by
number
X
number
of
trees
to
equal
the
size
of
this
room
when
you
plant
them.
What's
a
racial
of
survival
of.
K
L
E
Before
I
I'm
going
to
go
a
little
miss
doc,
there
is
plenty
of
people
out
in
the
viewing
audience
that
has
heard
us
say
over
and
over
again
pdpd
PD
PD,
and
this
is
probably
the
first
time
that
they're
hearing
the
PDA
and,
of
course
this
is
not
a
public
display
of
affection.
This
is
something
different.
Can
you
briefly
briefly
explain
the
difference
for
our
viewing
audience
absolutely.
D
Lashon
doc,
development
coordination
and
thank
you
so
much
for
that
question.
Yes,
a
PDA
is
a
planned
development,
alternative
versus
a
PD
which
is
a
plan
development.
So
with
a
PD,
you
have
a
site
plan.
It
is
a
site
plan,
Control
District
with
the
PD.
You
would
see
typically
You're
Building
Footprints.
You
see
the
curb
Cuts
you're
going
to
see
your
parking
placement.
D
You
would
have
elevations,
provided
you
can
see
the
site
as
it
will
exist
prior
to
permitting
at
that
phase,
a
PDA
and
typically,
let
me
take
a
step
back
with
a
PD.
It's
a
smaller
scale
project.
Maybe
it's
one
complete
phase
for
development.
A
PDA
is
a
larger
scale.
Project,
20,
acres
or
more
is
what
is
required
in
the
code,
typically
to
have
a
PDA,
a
plan,
development
alternative
and
because
it
is
a
larger
project,
it
is
a
phased
development.
So
you
will
not
see
things
like
building
footprint.
D
You
won't
see
the
curb
Cuts.
You
won't
see
the
placement
of
the
parking
spaces
the
landscaping,
and
it
is
a
commitment
as
a
part
of
that
overall
project
boundary
identified
through
that
PDA
to
meet
the
code
requirements
unless
they
are
waived
through
that
PDA.
So
it
is
a
phase
development.
Thank
you
for
that.
M
Good
evening
Council,
my
name
is
Catherine
Coyle
I'm,
with
Urban
urban
planning,
Innovations
we're
located
at
5312,
North,
Swanee,
Avenue
and
I
have
been
sworn
I
do
have.
M
M
One
addition
thing
additional
thing,
I
would
add
specifically
to
this
one
is:
there
is
a
development
agreement,
there's
a
Community,
Development
District,
there's
layers
of
additional
approvals
and
documents
that
control
what
happens
on
this
property,
not
just
the
plan
development,
alternative
that
grants
the
entitlements
and
sets
out
the
design,
standards
and
conditions
there's
a
whole
set
of
other
things
that
have
that
go
along
with
this
property,
adding
track
1B,
1C
and
3.
Approximately
five
acres
of
land
like
Ms
doc,
mentioned
I'm
sure
you
all
are
familiar
with
this
development.
M
M
M
M
so
far,
70
000
square
feet
and
Armature
Works
as
an
Adaptive
reuse
with
all
of
the
restaurants
and
Retail
uses
that
you've
seen
there
Heights
Union,
building,
300
000
square
foot
office,
it's
a
hundred
percent
occupied
and
those
were
all
brand
new
jobs
to
this
area,
with
Pfizer
World
support
center
and
oxygen,
which
is
biomed.
M
The
Pearl
mixed
use,
development,
mixed-use
project
on
the
North
End
at
Ross.
It's
314
luxury
apartments,
28
500
square
feet,
neighborhood
retail,
including
a
Tampa
General,
Medical,
Center,
small
one
Regional
garage
with
1469
cars,
which
service
the
whole
area,
and
you
probably
noticed
that
there
is
new
Sprouts
Farmers
Market
that
opened
as
well
to
bring
groceries
into
the
area
and
various
other
uses
that
are
added.
Miss
doc
did
a
wonderful
job
going
through
the
entitlements
changes,
and
you
can
see
that
some
went
up
and
some
went
down.
M
M
M
M
M
Happy
might
be
a
strong
word,
but
I'll
say
it
the
as
far
as
the
condition,
with
the
step
down
and
the
separation.
What
we
are
proposing
going
back
and
looking
at
the
site
and
I
want
counselor
to
keep
in
mind
that
site
is
very
small.
It's
proposed
for
a
hotel
and
it
is
only
a
16
000
square
foot
parcel,
which
is
very
small
for
commercial
standards,
and
it
does
have
to
flow
and
function
as
a
hotel.
M
M
As
the
arc
said,
86
feet
maximum
height,
we
can
actually
reduce
that
down
to
76
overall,
so
we'd
be
taking
10
feet
off
and
then
the
step
down
they
mentioned
at
a
45
foot
height
for
this
area.
Here,
looking
at
the
back
of
this
building
with
the
AC
units
and
the
fire
escapes,
what
we
can
do
is
as
opposed
to
putting
it
at
45
feet.
We
can
reduce
it
to
36
feet
and
then
keep
that
step
back
from
the
extension
of
the
Free
Library
on
the
south
side
of
the
alley.
M
36
feet
in
so
we're
getting
very
specific,
but
we're
also
reducing
the
amount
that
the
arc
actually
said
and
then
increase
the
South
Side
alley.
Minimum
setback
from
3
to
13.
three
is
what's
in
the
table
and
we
can
go
to
13
feet
where
that
smaller
extension
starts
and
then
we'll
stick
at
36
feet
from
two
36
foot
separation
from
the
back
of
the
Free
Library
and
then,
instead
of
going
to
86,
we
would
go
to
76..
So
we
respectfully
request
that
that
condition
be
replaced
with
what
the
arc
recommended.
M
The
other
conditions
that
staff
noted
on
the
site
plan
changes
between
first
and
second
reading.
We
are
in
agreement
to
specifically
with
the
Grand
trees
in
question
and
Mr
Puerto
Rico
at
dark
Moss
is
actually
present.
If
you
have
any
specific
questions
about
the
condition
of
those
particular
trees,
he
actually
did
the
rating
on
them,
but
just
to
give
Council
another
perspective.
M
M
I
would
like
to
show
you,
even
though
the
condition
rating
is
in
the
good
range,
with
what
a
b
this
is
14.
In
particular,
you
can
see
the
grade
change
here,
because
it
starts
to
slope
up
to
the
actual
Bridge
across
this
area,
between
the
sidewalk
coming
in,
and
keep
in
mind
that
this
big
portion
of
this
is
actually
a
flood
zone.
So
we
have
to
raise
the
elevation
for
the
minimum
floor.
M
This
grade
is
going
to
change
approximately
four
feet.
Just
to
be
able
to
do
the
buildings,
so
when
you
bring
that
four
feet
in
it,
there's
going
to
be
an
issue
with
this
particular
tree.
I
would
also
like
to
show
you
how
they're
sitting
they're,
not
just
growing
in
a
field
there
actually
is
pavement
next
to
them.
M
This
is
the
roundabout
and
the
trees
are
here
here
and
here,
and
you
can
see
they're
right
along
this
pavement,
these
two
and
this
one's
set
in
just
a
little
bit.
But
these
are
one
foot
Contours
coming
down.
It's
approximately
on
average,
about
four
foot
change
for
these
three
trees
that
are
going
to
be
impacted.
M
The
we
would
respectfully
request
that
the
waiver
be
granted
given
the
conditions
of
the
site
and
the
grade
change.
That's
going
to
have
to
happen.
We
believe
we
meet
reasonable
reconfiguration
criteria
and
we
believe
it's
in
your
ability
to
grant
that
waiver.
M
Finally,
we
did,
you
should
have
received
letters
of
support
from
the
two
registered
neighborhood
associations
and
regarding
the
concerns
that
were
noted
in
the
Ridgewood
Estates
or
woodrid
Heights
I'm,
sorry,
Tampa,
Heights,
first
and
foremost,
it
was
pretty
in
I,
would
say
pretty
enthusiastic
support.
They
did
note
the
issue
with
the
crosswalk
and
concern
about
pedestrian
safety
going
back
and
forth
between
the
garage
and
the
hotel
on
Tampa
street.
We
would
like
to
note
and
staff
actually
provided
this
to
us
as
well.
M
They
have
already
started
the
borings
for
the
for
the
posts
for
the
crosswalk.
The
signalized
crosswalk
should
be
actually
ready
to
go
within
six
months.
The
hotel
won't
be
built
for
another
year
or
a
year,
and
a
half
so
it'll
be
in
place
before
we
actually
move
forward
and
as
far
as
Ridgewood
Estates,
one
of
the
big
ones
was
no
commercial
access
for
vehicle
access
and
loading
to
the
local
streets,
Ross
being
the
one
on
the
North
in
that
particular
area,
and
also
making
sure
that
they
want
to
be
the
Riverwalk
to
continue.
M
There
actually
is
already
in
one
of
the
incremental
approvals,
the
12-foot
multi-use
path
as
it
connects,
and
it
goes
all
the
way
through
up
as
it's
proposed
for
its
Terminus
and
crossing
here
at
Ross.
We
are.
We
are
providing
additional
language
for
additional
20-foot
easement
off
the
west
side
of
North
Boulevard
for
maintenance
for
transportation
of
the
berm
in
this
area.
M
We
Believe
also
this
design
standards
that
are
actually
on
the
plan
limit
commercial
access
to
local
streets
already,
just
like
on
the
raw
side
of
pearl,
how
the
building
stepped
down
and
there's
no
commercial
access
to
it.
That
limitation
also
lands
on
this
property
on
the
side
of
the
west
side
of
Boulevard,
so
those
standards
actually
meet
what
the
neighborhood
wanted.
M
With
the
exception
of
the
request
to
consider
our
our
stipulation
for
the
arc
step
down
and
set
back
and
granting
the
waiver
for
all
of
the
trees
due
to
the
site
conditions
and
future
development,
we're
in
agreement
with
the
remaining
changes.
That
staff
would
like
between
first
and
second
reading,
and
we
respectfully
request
your
approval.
H
Okay,
because
I
saw
this
letter
that
you
put
on
the
overhead
from
Tampa
High
civic
association,
about
the
design
compatibility
to
the
rest
of
or
the
if
the
design
of
the
hotel
proposed
Hotel
will
complement
the
adjacent
buildings,
as
you
see,
are
all
brick
and
obviously
you
know
I
know
one
is
at
least
100
plus
years
old
and
the
other
one
I
don't
know,
but
so
it
still
would
have
to
go
to
the
arc
for
the
design.
Okay,
all
right!
Thank
you
very
much.
Councilman.
L
Miranda,
thank
you
chairman
Miss
Coyle.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
fine
presentation
on
trees,
5,
9
and
14.
I
just
want
to
get
my
bearing
straight.
Was
it
there
at
one
time
some
City
facilities,
that
was
city,
was
either
leasing
or
working
out
of
in
that
person?
I.
L
L
The
tree
survived
that,
and
it
was
also
at
one
time
if
I
recall,
because
I'm
one
of
them
weird
guys
that
never
go
home
the
same
way
I
go
different
ways
to
find
out
what
the
hell's
going
on
or
try
to
anyway
and
I
I
saw
some
like
it
wasn't
garbage
of
any
kind.
But
I
saw
some
construction
material,
big
pipes
at
one
time,
high
10,
12
feet,
high
of
some
type
of
material
used
to
fix
the
roads
and
whatever
and
I
believe
this
is
the
property
where
it
was
at
I'm,
not
sure.
M
You
are
correct,
actually
it's
actually
on
the
aerial,
the
aerial
when
the
satellite
went
over.
They
have,
they
happened
to
catch.
L
M
This
is
where
that
activity
was,
they
were
doing
major
storm
water
project.
L
E
E
N
The
the
height
difference,
if
I
remember
86,
to
76
what
what
are
you
all
losing
by
doing
that,
I'm
wondering
maybe
staff
can
answer
too.
Is
this
a
besides
the
arc?
Is
this
something
that
the
community
demanded?
It
seems
it
seems
like
it's
a
waste
to
artificially
make
the
building
smaller
in
that
space
there.
M
M
My
client
felt
that
it
was
a
concession
essentially
in
order
to
get
the
step
back
more
precise,
to
fit
the
building
on
the
site.
He
felt
that
coming
down
the
76
probably
would
be
a
good.
N
D
Yes,
lashon
doc
development
coordination.
That
was
a
request,
as
Catherine
has
stated,
that
was
made
by
the
developer
and
the
applicant
on
their
own.
So
they
did
not
request
them
to
lower
the
the
height,
but.
D
D
And
Council,
if
I
may,
just
for
the
record,
there
is
a
revised
revision
sheet.
So
the
changes
that
are
mentioned
as
far
as
the
height
has
been
modified
on
the
revision
sheet
and
the
waivers
are
listed
I'm
also
on
the
revision
sheet,
as
stated
by
the
applicant,
so
I
will
provide
that
for
the
record.
Thank
you.
E
E
L
L
If
we
have
anybody
to
go
out
to
recheck
and
checks
every
three
months
or
five
months,
maybe
we
can
have
a
some
individuals,
are
really
interested
in
doing
something
for
the
city
to
go
out
and
be
our
ice
in
our
Checkers
I.
Don't
think
we
check
I,
don't
believe
we
do
baby
I'm
wrong,
I've
been
wrong
or
before.
How
do
you
like
that?
But
it's
something
that
I
think
we
have
to
do
to
make
sure
that
what
we
say
is
done
and
not
that
there's
anything
going
on
I
just
want.
L
E
C
G
Good
evening,
Council
Annie
Barnes
development
coordination
item
number
two
is
SE
o
2203.
The
application
is
for
special
use,
two
for
a
medical
office
for
property
and
an
RO
one
zoning
residential
office.
Zoning
District
and
the
property
is
located
at
3606,
West
Swan
Avenue
I'll
turn
over
the
presentations
Planning
Commission
after
there
is
all
percent
money.
A
Good
evening
Council,
my
name
is
Emily
Phelan
I'm,
with
the
Planning
Commission
I've
been
sworn.
The
subject
site
is
located
within
the
South
Tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
the
Gulf
View
neighborhood.
The
closest
Transit
stop
is
located
within
a
quarter
mile
Northeast
of
the
subject
site
at
the
intersection
of
South
Sterling
Avenue
and
Henderson
Boulevard
Swan
Avenue
Circle
Park
is
the
closest
recreational
facility
located
One,
Mile
West
of
the
subject
site
and
the
site
is
within
a
level
C
evacuation,
Zone.
A
Here
is
an
aerial
of
the
subject
site
it's
right
here
outlined
in
purple
and
also
hatched
the
surrounding
development
pattern
is
predominantly
Light
commercial
uses,
with
a
transition
to
residential
uses,
one
block
to
the
north
and
also
one
block
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site.
The
subject
site
is
within
proximity
to
Henderson
Boulevard
to
the
east,
which
is
a
major
commercial
Corridor
in
Henderson
boulevards
right
here.
A
Here
is
a
map
of
the
adopted
future
land
use.
The
subject
site
has
residential
20
designation
again
the
subject
size
right
here.
The
surrounding
area
has
CMU
35,
which
is
the
purple
color
to
the
east,
along
Henderson
Boulevard
and
further
to
the
West
along
Swan
Avenue.
Here
R20
is
adjacent
to
this
site
and
r10
is
one
block
north
of
the
site.
A
The
site
plan
shows
defined
pedestrian
access
from
West
Swan
Avenue
to
the
front
entrance
of
the
facility,
which
is
consistent
with
Comprehensive
plan
policies
related
to
pedestrian
safety.
In
conclusion,
the
proposed
development
is
consistent
with
the
development
pattern
anticipated
under
the
residential
20
future
land
use
category
and
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
surrounding
development
pattern.
This
concludes
my
presentation.
If
you
have
any
questions
any.
G
Any
Barnes
development
coordination
again
the
property
is
Seeking,
a
special
use
to
for
a
medical
office.
This
is
required
in
the
r01
residential
office.
Zoning
district
for
3606,
West,
Swan,
Avenue,
property,
north
south
and
east
of
the
subject
site
are
Zone,
r01
and
majority
around
the
site
is
zoned
with
or
developed
with
office
uses
and
specifically
Medical
Offices
so
shown
here
is
the
subject
site.
This
is
Swan
Avenue
in
Henderson.
G
Shown
here
is
the
subject
site
with
the
the
building
developed.
It's
approximately
1847
square
feet
in
size
directly
across
the
street.
Is
a
dental
office.
G
And
some
other
office
uses
as
well.
Staff
did
review
the
section,
27
129
standards
as
well
as
section
27132,
and
the
site
does
meet
the
requirements
and
no
waivers
are
being
requested.
That
concludes
my
presentation,
I'm
available
for
any
questions
you
might
have
any.
B
B
Good
evening,
council
members,
my
name
is
Clay
Matthews
I'm,
an
attorney
from
smoker
Matthews.
We
are
located
at
100,
South,
Ashley,
Drive,
Suite,
1490,
that's
Tampa,
Florida,
33602
and
I
have
been
sworn.
We
represent
Layla
Ave
LLC,
which
owns
the
subject
property
located
at
3606,
West,
Swan
Avenue,
and
we've
submitted
this
special
use
to
application
on
their
behalf
to
use
the
property
as
a
medical
office.
I
was
going
to
go
over
some
some
brief
background
facts,
but
Miss
Barnes
covered
all
those
and
the
staff
covered
them
as
well.
B
So
I'll
I'll,
save
you
all
the
the
repetition
of
those
background.
Facts
I'll
just
note
that
my
client
purchased
this
property
at
the
end
of
end
of
2021
and
prior
to
that,
the
property
been
used
as
a
law
office
by
Stephen
Allen
PA.
For
what
I
understand
to
be
approximately
about
20
years
or
so
and
again
that
the
property
is
surrounded
by
many
office
uses,
including
a
dental
office
directly
across
the
street.
Our
clients
proposed
medical
office.
B
He
intends
to
operate
it
from
nine
to
five
PM
Monday
through
Friday
and
anticipates
about
eight
to
ten
patients
today
a
day
at
MO.
He
intends
on
using
the
existing
structure,
but
we'll
add
some
additional
features,
such
as
a
sidewalk
additional
parking
Ada
ramp
refuse
container
Etc.
All
these
items
are
noted
on
the
site
plan
and
our
expert
land
use.
Planner
Bruce
Landis
will
touch
on
those.
In
a
little
more
detail.
B
We've
just
submitted
that
the
packet
of
evidence
containing
the
documents
which
include
the
site
plan
and
also
the
staff
report,
and
we
will
also
introduce
Mr
Landis
here
to
testify
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
regarding
the
proposed
medical
office
use
as
well
as
demonstrating
compliance
to
all
of
the
criteria
for
special
use
too,
but
before
I
turn
it
over
to
him
I'll
just
State
for
the
record
that
we
submit
that
the
special
use
meets
all
the
special
use
criteria
under
Section
27
129
of
the
city
of
Tampa
Land
Development
code
and
I'll.
B
Just
note
him
for
the
record
that
that
those
criteria
are
won.
The
use
will
ensure
the
public
health
safety
and
general
welfare.
It's
located
where
proposed
and
developed
and
operated
according
to
the
plan.
As
submitted
two,
that
the
use
which
is
listed
as
a
special
use
in
the
district
in
which
it
is
proposed
to
be
located,
complies
of
all
required
regulations
and
standards,
including
the
provisions
of
Articles,
2,
6
and
9
of
this
chapter,
unless
greater
or
different
regulations
are
contained
in
the
individual
standards.
B
For
that
special
use,
three
that
the
use
is
compatible
and
contiguous
with
the
surrounding
property
or
the
use
of
public
necessity
for
the
uses
in
Conformity,
with
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan
and
five.
The
use
will
not
establish
a
precedent
of
or
encourage
more
intensive
or
incompatible
uses
in
the
surrounding
area.
So
with
that,
I'll
turn
it
over
to
our
expert
Landis
planner
I'm
engine
and
engineer
Mr
Landis,
who
will
provide
expert
testimony
as
to
the
proposed
use
and
compliance
with
this
criteria.
Just.
P
Thank
you
clay
good
good
evening,
chairman
council
members,
City
staff
for
the
record.
My
name
is
Bruce
Landis
I
am
at
3810
Northdale
Boulevard,
Tampa,
Florida,
33624
and
I
have
been
sworn
as
you've
heard,
from
staff
and
from
the
applicants
representative.
This
is
an
existing
structure
which
has
been
operating
as
a
professional
building
office
for
nearly
20
years.
The
applicant
and
owner
desires
to
change
the
use
to
a
medical
office
and
as
such,
according
to
the
code
city
code,
that
requires
a
special
use.
P
The
property
Lauren
is
about
10,
000
square
foot
property
and,
as
you
heard,
1800
square
foot
structure
very
little
is
being
planned
to
be
changed
on
the
property
itself
as
a
site
plan
and
illustrates,
and
as
as
part
of
the
records,
just
some
strips
of
of
additional
concrete
to
widens
a
few
spots,
but
largely
the
property
as
it
exists
today
will
will
be.
What
is
the
supporting
structure?
P
What
I
would
like
to
do
very
quickly
is
to
outline
our
compliance
with
the
special
use
criteria
and
I'll
just
for
convenience
reference,
those
to
re-reading
them
what
Mr
Matthews
just
did
so.
The
first
special
use
criteria
is
to
ensure
the
public
health
safety
and
general
wear
welfare.
This
use
is
stipulated
to
be
a
medical
use,
it's
in
an
area
of
surrounding
of
nearby
and
adjoining
medical
uses,
so
it's
certainly
compatible
with
the
trend.
P
P
You
heard
testimony
from
Planning
Commission
staff
as
to
its
compatibility,
the
it
is
an
res
residential
20
category
that
proposed
medical
office
as
I
stated,
is
1800
square
feet.
The
size
of
the
property
is
ten
thousand
square
feet.
The
f
far
is
well
below
the
comp
plan.
Max
of
0.5,
ours
is
actually
the
existing
0.19.
P
Some
of
the
key
characteristics
for
compatibility
is
the
architectural
style
remain
the
same
and
continue
to
have
the
general
Conformity
with
the
rest
of
the
area
and
we're
providing
our
part
of
the
comprehensive,
multimodal
Transportation
Network,
providing
a
sidewalk
in
the
front
of
our
property
within
the
right-of-way
of
swan
Avenue
and
providing
an
accessible
route
to
the
entrance
of
the
building
and
an
accessible
handicap
ramp.
The
street
canopy
provides
for
Shades.
We
have.
P
We
have
a
surplus
number
of
trees
on
our
property
and
along
the
frontage,
and
so
we
will
be
preserving
the
entirety
of
those
trees,
with
the
exceptions
of
the
few
that
we
have
to
remove
for
the
additional
widening
that
of
the
paving
that
the
staff
requested
and
that
we
have
shown
on
the
site
plan
and
the
building
Heights.
The
comprehensive
plan
states
that
there
to
be
three
stories
or
less
our
building
is
primarily
one
story
in
one
short
section
of
two-story
and
finally,
the
criteria
number
five.
P
The
use
will
not
establish
a
precedent
or
encourage
more
intensive
and
cap
and
compatible
uses
in
the
area
as
I
identified.
It
is
in
keeping
with
the
r01
allowable
uses
and
also
the
allowable
uses
within
the
comprehensive
plan,
and
then
I
do
want
to
wrap
up
with
touch
on
seven
criteria
that
are
within
section
27-129a
versus
Ingress
egress.
We
have
more
than
adequate
access
to
Swan
Avenue
directly.
P
We
have
the
code
required
parking
provided
and
we
have
extensive
landscaping
and
screening
the
surrounding
uses,
even
though
they're
compatible
we're
still
complying
with
the
required
screening,
Refuge
refuse
and
service
areas.
We
are
screening
the
the
garbage
cans
in
the
area
and,
like
all
the
other
properties
along
that
section
of
swan
Avenue,
will
be
rolling
the
trash
out
to
the
curb
for
pickup.
You
know
somewhat
of
a
legacy
from
the
residential
original
residential
character
of
the
area
lighting.
P
We
propose
no
additional
changes
to
the
lighting
utilities,
we're
adding
we're
not
proposing
any
intense,
more
intense
use
of
the
property
and
drainage.
There
are
no
impacts
and
then
finally,
number
seven
control
potentially
adverse
effects.
Generally.
This
is
a
low
intensity
use,
and
so
it
will
certainly
preserve
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
and
with
that
I'll
print
it
back
over
to
Mr
Matthews.
B
Thank
you,
Mr
Landis,
with
that,
based
on
the
evidence
submitted
in
the
testimony
elicited
today,
we
respectfully
request
that
the
council
approve
the
special
use
to
application
and
we're
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have
thank.
E
C
Yes,
sir
I'm
moving
orange
being
presented
for
first
reading
consideration
an
ordinance
approving
a
special
use
permit
app,
proving
the
medical
office
in
r01
residential
office,
zoning
district
and
general
vicinity
of
3606
West
Swan
Avenue
City
of
Tampa
Florida,
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
here
of
providing
an
effective
date.
Second,.
C
G
Annie
Barnes
development
coordination
item
number
four
is
Rez
2226.
The
request
is
to
rezone
property
located
8102
North
Temple
Circle
in
8101
North
39th
Street
from
CG
and
CN
to
plan
development
for
residential
single
family
attached
uses,
I'll
turn
over
the
presentation
planning
permission
and
after
their
presentation.
G
A
Good
evening,
Emily
Phelan
with
the
Planning
Commission
I
have
been
sworn
the
subject
site
is
located
within
the
central
Tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
the
stadium
area.
Neighborhood.
The
closest
Transit
stop
is
located
within
a
half
mile
north
of
the
subject
site
on
West
Martin,
Luther,
King,
Boulevard
and
North
Gomez
Avenue
Al
Lopez
park
is
the
closest
recreational
facility
located
within
one
mile
Northwest
of
the
subject
site
and
the
site
is
located
with
within
level
E
evacuation
Zone.
I
A
I
hope
he's
only
the
subject
site
is
located
within
the
university
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
the
temple
Crest
neighborhood.
A
The
closest
Transit
stop
is
located
approximately
200
feet,
southeast
of
the
subject
site
at
the
corner
of
North
40th
Street
and
East
Miller
Avenue
Temple
Crest
Park
is
the
closest
recreational
facility
located
two
blocks
west
of
the
subject
site
and
the
site
is
not
located
within
an
evacuation.
Zone.
A
Here
is
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site,
which
is
right
here:
our
line
of
purple.
It
is
located
on
North,
Greenwood
Avenue
and
between
North
39th
Street
and
North
Temple
Crest
Circle.
The
surrounding
development
pattern
is
pronoun
is
predominantly
residential
with
the
transition
to
commercial
uses
along
North,
40th
Street.
A
Here's
the
map
of
the
adopted
future
land
use
the
subject
site
has
a
community
mixed-use
residential
35
Community
mixed
use.
35
designation
right
here
in
pink.
The
surrounding
area
has
Community
mixed
use,
35
to
the
north
and
east
of
the
subject:
site
and
residential
10
to
the
west
and
south
of
the
subject
site
and
then
further
to
the
West
is
Temple
Crest
Park.
A
The
subject
site
is
located
within
the
North
40th
Street
mixed-use
Corridor.
Within
these
areas,
the
comprehensive
plan
promotes
a
development
pattern
that
encourages
walking
and
Transit
through
building
design
and
pedestrian
amenities.
The
proposed
density
of
eight
units
is
under
the
maximum
density
that
can
be
considered
under
the
Community
makes
use
35
designation
due
to
the
presence
of
single-family
uses
in
the
surrounding
area.
Planning
Commission
staff
has
determined
that
the
proposed
PD
zoning
is
comparable
to
the
development
pattern.
A
The
proposed
request
supports
many
of
the
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
as
it
relates
to
the
housing
of
the
City's
population.
The
Tampa
comprehensive
plan
encourages
new
housing
on
vacant
and
under
underutilized
land
to
ensure
that
an
adequate
supply
of
housing
is
available
to
meet
the
needs
of
Tampa's
present
and
future
populations.
A
G
Any
Barnes
development
coordination
again
Rec
2226
properties,
located
8102
Temple,
Crest,
Circle,
88101,
North,
39th
Street,
the
applicant
proposes
to
rezone
the
property
from
CG
commercial
General
and
CN
commercial
neighborhood
to
PD
for
single
family
attached
uses.
G
These
properties
are
largely
developed
with
single
family
single-family
dwellings.
Specifically,
this
project
is
for
eight
residential
single-family
attached
units
shown
here
on
the
site
plan.
G
Proposed
maximum
Building
height
is
36
feet.
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
waiver
to
reduce
parking
from
18
spaces
to
16
parking
spaces.
However,
the
applicant
is
saving
all
the
grand
trees
on
site.
So
therefore,
development
coordination
found
the
request
consistent,
just
continuing
along
I'm,
going
to
show
you
the
elevations
that
we're
provided.
G
As
well
as
intersection
to
the
south
of
the
site
and
property
north
of
the
site,
just
give
you
an
idea
that
the
overall
character
of
the
area,
again
staff
I,
found
the
request
consistent
and
I'm
available.
If
you
have
any
questions.
E
E
L
But
if
the
other
lady
here
miss
I,
know
she's
a
petitioner
but
is
polka
Hernandez
we're
moving
on.
G
Annie
Barnes
development
coordination
item
number
six
is
RZ
2237..
The
request
is
to
rezone
the
property
located
several
addresses
on
North
Nebraska
Avenue,
as
well
as
several
addresses
listed
in
the
staff
report
on
East
Henderson
Avenue
Estelle
Street.
The
request
is
rezoned
the
property
from
rm16
CG
yc5
to
PD
and
yc9
I'm,
going
to
turn
over
the
report
to
the
Planning
Commission
after
theirs.
I'll
conclude
my
presentation.
J
J
Our
next
case
is
within
the
central
Tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
the
Central
Park
Urban
Village,
the
closest
Transit
stop
is
adjacent
to
the
subject
site
at
the
intersection
of
eastel
street
in
North
Nebraska
Avenue.
This
Transit
stop
is
served
by
heart
route,
400
connecting
the
subject
site
to
downtown
Tampa
and
the
university
area.
I
do
want
to
note
that
North
Nebraska
Avenue
is
a
Transit
emphasis.
Corridor.
J
J
Map
of
the
subject's
site
in
the
surrounding
properties
you'll
see
the
subject
site
here.
It's
outlined
in
the
Purple
colors
to
the
southeast
of
the
intersection
or
Southwest
of
the
intersection
of
East
Henderson
Avenue
in
North
Nebraska
Avenue.
The
surrounding
development
pattern
is
predominantly
Urban
in
character.
J
J
The
subject
site
as
I
stated
earlier,
is
within
an
urban
area.
It's
recognized
under
the
urban
mixed
use,
60
future
land
use
designation,
which
generally
allows
for
development
up
to
60
dwelling
units
or
per
acre
or
up
to
a
3.25.
Far
the
segment
of
North
Nebraska
Avenue
between
East
Henderson,
Avenue
and
Scott
Street
contains
Parcels
recognized
under
the
umu
60
designation.
J
The
CMU
35
is
directly
east
of
the
subject
sites
generally
on
the
east
side
of
North,
Nebraska
Avenue
and
then
within
a
quarter
mile
south
of
the
subject
site
is
land
recognized
under
the
rmu
100.
That's
shown
here
in
this
in
the
magenta
color
on
our
map
on
the
planet,
commission
staff
reviewed
the
request
and
found
it
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
surrounding
area.
The
PD
proposes
39
single-family
attached
units
at
a
22.29
units
per
acre,
which
is
well
below
the
density
anticipated
under
the
urban
mix.
J
U60
designation,
the
subject
site,
is
also
within
a
mixed-use
corridor,
as
defined
by
the
comprehensive
plan.
The
request
addresses
many
of
the
policies
in
many
of
the
mixed-use
quarter.
Policies
public
sidewalks
are
provided
along
all
adjacent
public
rights
away
and
internal
pedestrian
connections
are
provided
so
pedestrians
can
access
Transit
and
safely
navigate
throughout
the
site.
J
The
PD
proposes
a
waiver
to
allow
units,
one
through
four
11-23
and
27
through
28,
to
not
face
the
street
right-of-way
and
that's
Weber
4
on
the
site
plan,
because
UNS
1,
through
3,
11-14
and
27
are
not
adjacent
to
the
public
right
away.
The
entrances
cannot
Orient
to
a
neighborhood
sidewalker
street.
The
applicant
has
providing
internal
pedestrian
connections
that
connect
the
entrances
from
these
units
to
the
sidewalks
along
along
the
public
rights
away
meeting
the
intent
of
this
policy.
J
Likewise,
units
4,
15
and
28
are
adjacent
to
a
public
right-of-way
and
the
PD
proposes
pedestrian
connections
from
the
entrances
to
the
adjacent
public
sidewalks.
Overall,
the
planet,
commission
staff
finds
the
request
meets
the
overall
intent
of
the
mixed
use,
Corridor
policies
and
land
use
policy
9.2.6.
J
The
request
supports
many
of
the
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plans
that
relates
to
housing,
the
City's
population.
The
Tampa
comprehensive
plan
encourages
new
housing
on
vacant
and
underutilized
land
to
ensure
that
an
adequate
supply
of
housing
is
available
to
meet
the
needs
of
Tampa's
growing
population.
J
In
conclusion,
the
requests
will
promote
a
residential
development
pattern,
consistent
with
the
compact
City
Forum
strategy,
with
increased
availability
of
availability
of
housing
at
densities
that
promote
walking
and
Transit
use
near
employment
concentrations,
residential
services
and
amenities.
The
planet
commission
staff
request
that
the
applicant
record,
the
urban
mix,
260
designation
and
a
site
data
data
table
between
first
and
second
readings
based
on
these
considerations.
The
planet,
commission
staff
finds
the
request
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
city
of
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
This
concludes
my
presentation
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Any.
G
G
G
Currently,
the
subject
site
is
used
as
a
parking
lot
in
vacant
land.
The
properties
to
the
north
are
zoned
rm24
to
the
West
is
rm16.,
so
there's
a
variety
of
residential
housing
types
as
well
as
zoning
in
the
area
shown
here
is
the
subject
site.
G
A
maximum
Building
height
for
the
town
homes
is
36
feet
tall,
a
total
of
65
parking
spaces
are
required,
Acquired
and
92
are
being
provided.
Vehicular
access
is
provided
from
East
South,
Street
and
East
Henderson
Avenue
and
development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
found
the
request
consistent
again
I'm,
going
to
show
you
the
surrounding
area.
G
E
O
Jennifer
Latimer
1925
East
6th
Avenue
I
am
one
of
the
developers
on
the
project.
I
work
for
site
development.
We
are
a
local
eboard-based
company.
We
have
been
in
Ybor
City
for
over
10
years
now,
we're
part
of
the
Ebor
community
and
we're
excited
about
the
dynamic
Evolution,
that's
happening
in
the
district
and
we're
very
excited
to
be
part
of
it.
All
of
our
eboard
projects
are
unique
and
have
added
character
to
the
community.
O
A
few
of
our
past
projects
include
extensive
renovations
to
Historic
Bungalows
within
the
historic
district,
Workforce
apartments
and
new
construction.
A
new
construction
building
that
is
has
been
our
headquarters.
For
the
last
few
years.
We
have
developed
a
brand
for
this
development.
It's
called
canvas
canvas.
The
canvas
brand
stands
for
freedom
of
creativity,
and
we
like
to
highlight
the
local
artists
of
the
neighborhood,
we're
proud
of
the
local
artist
community
and
have
developed
a
brand
to
pay
at
homage.
O
We
developed
this
brand
by
collaborating
with
a
local
design
team,
that's
based
in
Ybor
City,
as
well
as
local
artists,
who
will
create
Arts
installations
for
the
development
and
the
industrial
style.
Architecture
is
influenced
by
Ybor
City
warehouses
that
have
been
converted
to
artist
Studios,
as
well
as
some
Living
Spaces.
O
It's
surrounded
by
a
few
master
plan
developments,
it
improves
vacant,
unimproved,
land,
adding
to
the
tax
basis,
and
we
have
coordinated
the
site
plan
to
retain
four
grand
cherries
that
are
within
the
Ebor
historic
district,
and
that
concludes
my
portion
of
of
the
sorry
lost
my
words
there
of
the
presentation
and
Mark
Bentley.
Our
attorney
will
take
over
from
there.
R
R
The
rezonings
from
arm
24
to
yc5,
to
PD
and
also
to
a
yc9
and
the
reason
why
C9
is
because
about
two-thirds
of
the
subject
properties
located
in
the
Ebor
historic
district.
It's
subject
to
the
Barrio
Latino
design,
standards,
Etc,
and
it
also
is
a
part
of
this
process-
had
to
appear
before
the
Barrio
and
get
a
recommendation
to
city
council
which,
hopefully,
you
received
whether
or
not
the
subject
rezoning
would
have
an
adverse
impact
on
the
integrity
and
character
of
the
historic
district.
R
R
This
is
also
what
we
consider
phase
two
of
the
canvas
project
and
you
might
recall
earlier
this
year,
I
think
it
was
the
latter
part
of
March
that
city
council
approved
what
I
call
phase
one.
If
you
can
look
on
the
overhead.
R
This
yellow
area
is
what
we're
dealing
with
tonight.
It's
phase
two,
and
this
is
phase
one
city
council
approved
phase,
one
I
think
on
March
25th
and
it
was
for
40
Town
Homes.
It's
almost
the
same
project,
the
as
I
mentioned
about
two-thirds
of
the
project
was
in
the
historic
district
and
also
the
Barrio
Latino
staff
recommended
approval
to
its
board
into
city
council.
Likewise,
you
heard
Mr
Collins
recommend
approval
from
the
Planning
Commission
staff.
R
We
also
submitted
numerous
letters
and
support
from
stakeholders
in
the
e-board
community
and
it's
just
been
nothing
but
positive
feedback
and
with
respect
to
the
waivers,
these
are
the
same
waivers
we
requested
and
were
approved
essentially
at
for
phase
one.
If
you
want
me
to
go
through
that,
I
will,
but
we
have
a
finding
of
consistency
from
all
staffs
or
all
agencies
associated
with
the
city,
which
is
kind
of
a
rarity
in
these
days.
So
that
being
said,
unless
you
have
any
questions,
either
directly
request
to
council's
approval.
C
Is
this
the
project
connected
to
across
from
Taylor
Park
Plaza.
C
R
O
I
was
not
here
for
that
portion
of
the
the
first
portion.
Do
you
have
any
renderings
that
you
can
show.
O
R
Here
is
the
project
we're
dealing
with
tonight.
The
allowable
height
in
the
district
is
45
feet,
and
these
are
36
foot
Townhomes,
three
story,
there's
39
of
them,
and
this
elevation
is
essentially
the
same
as
the
one
and
I
could
dig
it
up,
but
take
my
word
for
it.
It's
essentially
the
same
as
phase
one.
R
And
it's
kind
of
interesting,
because
the
barrio's
role
is
typically
to
approve
the
exterior
design.
So
when
they're,
it's
kind
of
a
challenge
when
they're
presented
with
the
rezoning,
they
don't
it's
kind
of
unique
to
them.
So
it's
kind
of
a
quasi
review
of
the
exterior
design
too.
So
it
was
more
than
just
kind
of
a
like
kick
the
tires
yeah,
it
looks
good,
they
wanted
to
know
and
they
reviewed
the
elevations
and
you
know
really
were
very
diligent,
very
thorough
about
it.
R
O
O
Latimer
1925
East
6th
Avenue
yeah,
so
we
developed
the
brand
canvas
around
the
local
neighborhood
artists.
We
wanted
the
artist
to
have
some
freedom
to
pause
and
we
haven't
worked
out
details
yet
since
we're
still
in
the
planning
phases,
but
we
would
like
a
local
artist
or
multiple
local
artists
to
maybe
install
a
statue
or
some
artwork
on
the
building.
We
haven't
gotten
that
far
yet,
but
there
will
be
some
local
artists
or
multiple
local
artists
involved
in
this
community.
R
C
E
R
E
Any
other
questions
apparently
I
have
one
the.
What
is
the
rooftop
height
36
feet?
The
squares
and
rectangles
on
top
of
the
roof
are
those
Cosmetics.
R
Some
of
those
are
like
parapits
that
you
can
go
up
to
a
certain
height
and
it's
not
it's
not
included
in
your
height
if
it's
kind
of
ornamental,
but
those
are
these
are
just
conceptual
right
now
and
we
have
to
sort
that
out
with
the
Barrio
Latino
Commission.
Of
course,
yeah.
F
No
I
did
a
couple
of
things:
I,
don't
believe
the
rent
they
are
held
to
the
renderings
per
se.
He
is
right,
especially
for
the
portion.
That's
within
the
Ebor
historic
district
he's
going
to
have
to
go
back
before
the
Barrio
for
approval
of
the
actual
design.
Our
code
does
allow
for
a
certain
for
a
certain
percentage
of
the
roof
for
roof
structures,
for
air
conditioning
for
equipment,
that
sort
of
thing
to
be
placed
there
and
not
be
counted
toward
height,
so
that
that
may
be
part.
R
C
E
E
Miss
Holly
give
me
one.
Second
I
apologize
is
Mr
Canty,
also
on
the
line.
C
What
our
family
might
want
to
do
with
the
property
to
make
sure
we're
not
boxed
in
and
how
does
this
affect
our
property
value?
D
C
F
F
Not
affect
your
zoning
ma'am,
it
I
mean
it
does
not
affect
what
your
current
zoning
is
for
your
property,
which
is
yc5,
so
you
still
have
yc5
and
you
can
develop
in
a
manner
consistent
with
yc5,
so
that
the
property
being
rezoned
next
door
does
not
affect
your
current
Zone.
F
How
you
fix
your
value?
That's
not
really
something
that
that
is
something
that
we
would
consider
here
and
it's
it's
not
something
that
the
petitioner
would
have
to
to
show.
But
again,
this
application
affects
only
the
property
such
as
the
application.
It
does
not
affect
your
property,
so
you
would
retain
your
wife,
yc5
zoning.
R
E
O
I'm
I'm
prepared
because
councilman
manisco's
turn
so
I
move
an
ordinance
file;
number
Rez
22-37
on
application,
requesting
to
rezone
properly
generally
located
at
1534,
1604
1608
and
1614
North
Nebraska
Avenue
711
805
and
813
East
Henderson
Avenue
1313,
East,
Estelle,
Street,
one
nine,
two:
six:
six:
two
dot:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
and
one
nine
two:
six
one:
nine
dot:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
from
rm16
CG
and
yc5
to
PD
and
yc9
residential
single
family
attached.
E
C
E
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
C
E
E
C
G
Sure
I
was
going
to
introduce
the
case
and
then
turn
it
over
to
Planning,
Commission
and
then
I'll
run
through
item
number.
Four
is
res:
2226
request
to
rezone
from
or
rezone
from
CG
and
CN
to
PD
for
8102
North,
Temple,
Circle
and
8101
North,
39th,
Street
and
I'll
turn
it
over
to
the
language.
A
This
is
okay,
Emily
Phelan,
Planning,
Commission
staff
I,
have
been
sworn
the
subject.
Site
is
located
within
the
university
planning
district.
More
specifically
in
the
temple
Crest
neighborhood,
the
closest
Transit
stop
is
located
approximately
200
feet,
southeast
of
the
subject
site
at
the
corner
of
North
40th
Street
and
East
Miller
Avenue
Temple
Crest
Park
is
the
closest
recreational
facility
located
two
blocks
west
of
the
subject
site
and
the
site
is
not
located
within
an
evacuation.
Zone
here
is
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site.
A
A
Here's
my
future
land
use
map.
Oh
my
maps
were
messed
up.
Sorry,
here's
a
map
of
the
adopted
future
land
use.
The
subject
side
has
a
community
mixed-use
designation.
It's
the
pink
color
the
surrounding
area
has
Community,
makes
use
35s
in
the
north
and
east
of
the
subject
site
in
residential
10
to
the
west
and
south
of
the
subject
site,
and
this
is
Temple
Crest
Park.
The
subject
side
is
located
within
the
North
40th
Street
mixed-use
Corridor.
A
Within
these
areas,
the
comprehensive
plan
promotes
a
development
pattern
that
encourages
walking
and
Transit
through
building
design
and
pedestrian
amenities.
The
proposed
density
of
eight
units
is
under
the
maximum
density
that
can
be
considered
under
the
Community
makes
use
35
designation
due
to
the
presence
of
single-family
uses
in
the
surrounding
areas.
Planning
Commission
staff
has
determined
that
the
proposed
plan
development
is
comparable
to
the
development
pattern.
The
proposed
request
supports
many
of
the
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plan
as
it
relates
to
housing
the
City's
population.
A
G
Any
Barnes
development
coordination
I'm
just
going
to
feed
through
this,
since
we
already
are
I
already
presented
before
the
request.
Just
rezone
the
property
from
CG
and
CN
to
plan
development
for
residential
single
family
attached
uses,
the
project
is
proposed
for
exactly
eight
residential
single-family
attached
uses
shown
here
is
the
subject
site
outlined
in
red,
as
shown
there's
a
mixture
of
residential
uses
and
Zoning
in
the
immediate
area
staff
found
the
request
consistent.
Even
though
there's
a
waiver
provided
to
reduce
parking,
the
applicant
is
saving
the
grand
trees
on
site.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
H
Yes,
Dwayne
Milford
address
is
7720
palera,
Drive,
Odessa,
Florida
and
I
would
like
to
apologize
for
what
happened
earlier,
while
Annie
Barnes
was
presenting
our
case,
we
had
a
lightning
strike
here
that
shut
everything
down,
so
we
we
were
online
and
did
did
hear
that
so
I
apologize
for
that
I
won't
draw
this
out
and
take
any
extra
unnecessary
time
just
want
to
point
out
a
few
things.
H
Real
quick,
as
has
been
mentioned,
current
property
is
on
cnncg,
which
would
allow
some
neighborhood
commercial
uses,
but
because
of
the
surrounding
uses,
it
doesn't
seem
that
that's
that's
a
wise
use
for
the
property
and,
of
course,
residential
uses
are
allowed
in
the
commercial
zoning,
with
a
S1
type
zoning
administrator
review,
but
because
of
the
shape
of
the
property,
the
size
of
the
property
and
the
locations
of
grand
trees
that
have
been
previously
mentioned.
H
We
have
three
grand
trees
on
the
east
side
of
our
property,
one
in
the
middle
and
then
one
on
the
three
on
the
west,
one
in
the
middle
and
one
on
the
east
and
the
one
on
the
east
is
actually
in
the
right
of
way.
So,
four
on
site,
one
in
the
right
of
way,
and
so
we
met
with
development
coordination
staff
early
on
and
they
agreed
that
to
do
what
we
want
to
do
and
do
it
the
best
way
that
the
PD
was
the
way
to
go.
H
The
the
future
land
use
would
allow
more
units
than
we're
proposing,
but
we
believe
this
is
a
the
best
development
considering
the
neighborhood
and
the
site
itself.
We
do
have
a
letter
of
support
or
an
email
of
support.
Actually
that
was
submitted
to
council
from
the
temple
Crest
civic
association
and
as
Miss
Barnes
mentioned,
we
have
the
one
waiver
where
we
would
have
two
parking
spaces
per
unit
or
16
spaces
being
reduced
from
the
18
required
by
code,
so
I'll
leave
it
at
that
for
now
be
available
to
answer
questions.
H
Mr
Martinez
Who's
online
also
is
part
of
the
development
team.
He
is
my
client
either
of
us
can
answer
questions,
but
we
certainly
request
your
approval
and
appreciate
your
time.
E
E
C
G
A
Emily
Phelan
with
the
Planning
Commission
I,
have
been
sworn
the
subject
site
is
located
within
the
central
Tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
the
stadium
area.
Neighborhood.
The
closest
Transit
stop
is
located
within
a
half
a
mile
north
of
the
subject
site
on
West
Martin,
Luther,
King,
Boulevard
and
North
Gomez
Avenue
Al
Lopez
park
is
the
closest
recreational
facility
located
within
one
mile
Northwest
of
the
subject
site
and
the
site
is
located
within
level.
E,
evacuation,
Zone,
here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
the
sites
outlined
in
purple.
A
A
Here's
a
map
of
the
adopted
future
land
use.
The
subject
site
is
within
two
future:
land
use
designations,
residential
10,
which
is
the
orange
color
and
residential
20,
which
is
the
brownish
color.
The
surrounding
area
has
residential
10
to
the
north
and
south
of
the
subject
site
residential
20
to
the
west
and
public
quasi-public
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site,
which
is
the
elementary
school.
A
The
subject
site
is
on
the
periphery
of
the
neighborhood,
and
the
comprehensive
plan
encourages
single-family
attached
units
to
be
limited
to
the
periphery
of
established
single-family
neighborhoods.
The
request
would
allow
for
10
single-family
attached
residential
youth
units
at
an
overall
density
of
10.86
units
per
acre,
which
is
consistent
with
the
density
anticipated
under
the
residential
10
and
residential
20
future
land
use
designations
Additionally.
The
rezoning
will
provide
additional
housing
on
an
underutilized
parcel.
A
G
So
this
is
the
subject
site
site
shown
here.
It
has
this
unusual
l
or
t
shape.
G
It's
approximately
the
site
is
approximately
0.92
acres
in
size.
The
portion
along
North
Lincoln
Avenue,
was
developed
with
a
single
family
detached
home
and
then
the
portion
along
Tampa
Bay
Boulevard,
is
developed
with
business
professional
office.
There
are
several
residential
residential
in
school
and
Commercial
uses
in
the
general
vicinity.
G
However,
property
north
south
and
east
of
the
subject
site
is
Zone
rs50.
The
proposed
project
is
for
two
residential
single-family
attached
buildings,
with
a
total
of
10
residential
dwelling
units
shown
here.
Here's
the
site
plan
that
was
provided
maximum
principal
building
height
is
35
feet
and
vehicular
access
is
provided
from
West
Tampa
Bay
Boulevard
North,
Lincoln
Avenue.
G
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
waiver
to
allow
to
through
units
two
through
ten
to
have
ground
floor
entrances
front
doors,
not
face
a
street
right
away.
However,
staff
did
review
section,
27.,
136
I,
believe
it
is
yes
136
and
found
that
the
unusual
shape
of
the
parcel
warrants
this
waiver
request
and
it
would
be
difficult
to
develop
under
a
standard
euclidean
zoning
District,
so
staff
found
the
request
consistent
and
I'm
available.
G
C
E
G
Yes,
I
think
so.
I
should
know.
Q
Good
evening,
Aaron
Mayers
res
by
Mez,
Development
LLC,
we
are
a
Florida
Corporation
I
am
a
Tampa
homeowner
and
Resident
719
North,
Rome
Avenue,
but
also
split
my
time
into
my
office
in
Texas.
Also
calling
in
on
the
line
is
the
architect
on
the
project.
Jay
Reynolds,
so
we'll
be
touching
base
with
him
just
shortly.
It
has
been
our
goal
to
invest
in
this
community
and
we
want
to
invest
in
areas
that
might
not
be
seeing
the
same
benefits
that
other
residents
in
other
parts
of
town
are
seeing.
Q
If
you
look
West
several
blocks
to
West
Shore,
look
south
to
North
Hyde
Park,
where
we
currently
reside
or
east
several
blocks
to
Tampa
Heights
adjacent
neighborhoods,
whose
home
values
have
benefited
from
developers
like
myself
and
whose
infrastructure
has
been
improved
to
support
that
growth
streets
surrounding
our
parcel.
We
are
working
to
Res
that
we
are
working
to
rezone,
have
not
seen
the
same
economic
benefit
or
infrastructure
improvements.
Average
home
and
parcel
values
are
well
behind
that
of
some
of
the
adjacent
neighborhoods.
Q
This
is
a
view
of
what
was
4005
North
Lincoln,
with
the
rendering
of
of
our
project.
The
city
planning
department
has
already
addressed
in
their
report
the
diversity
of
the
parcels
in
our
immediate
area.
While
many
are
zoned
rs50,
they
still
are
home
to
an
elementary
school.
Q
Economic
support
in
this
area
would
provide
new
housing
opportunities
for
existing
Tampa
residents
or
opportunities
for
new
residents,
allowing
the
city
to
expand
its
tax
base.
We
hope
to
be
a
leader
in
this
part
of
the
community.
We
hope
we
can
work
to
develop
other
properties
in
this
immediate
area,
but
we
also
hope
our
investment
entices
others
to
follow
our
lead
and
join
us
in
investing
in
this
area.
Q
The
council
should
know
our
neighbors
at
the
optimal
Women's
Center,
which
is
3203
West
Tampa
Bay
Boulevard
have
expressed
their
support
in
writing
for
our
project,
as
have
our
neighbors
at
4007.
North
Lincoln
Avenue
they've
also
expressed
support
for
our
plan
to
improve
our
share
borders
for
both
architectural
value
and
safety.
Q
Our
eastern
border
is
the
Tampa
Bay,
Boulevard,
Elementary,
3201,
West
Tampa
has
been
vacant
for
years,
and
it's
been
falling
apart.
It
has
been
neglected,
it
has
been
broken
into
the
front
door
is
currently
broken
into
and
it
has
been
vandalized.
This
is
not
safe
for
any
Community,
certainly
not
safe
for
the
Tampa
Bay
Elementary,
that
is
our
neighbor
to
the
east.
Q
Q
We
have
had
several
very
positive
conversations
with
Representatives,
specifically
from
the
school
district
and
continue
to
work
with
them
towards
making
sure
this
project
can
be
carefully
developed
with
the
safety
of
students
in
mind
and
that
the
end
result
is
beneficial
to
the
school
and
the
community
in
general,
I've
been
fortunate
to
be
working
with
ojmr,
talented
architecture
group,
with
an
innovative
eye,
focus
on
sustainability
and
staying
green
and
so
I
will
turn
the
rest
of
the
presentation
over
to
Jay
Reynolds.
If.
Q
H
Q
C
H
You
thank
you
Jay
Reynolds,
chair
architect,
thank
you,
Aaron,
and
we
appreciate
saying
a
couple
points
just
to
further
our
our
consideration
here
for
one
we
wanted
to
talk
about
the
the
difficult
in
in
the
tight
sight
and
the
unique
no
says
Annie
had
mentioned
as
well
and
stormwater
we're
working
currently
with
engineering
and
we're
going
to
be
retaining
all
that
water
on
site.
H
We
have
a
enough
of
a
driveway
now
that
we
can
actually
take
most
of
that
and,
if
not
all,
into
that
concrete
vault,
which
we
and
Aaron
showing
you
on
the
drawing
we're
excited
about
the
opportunity
to
develop
this
neighborhood
and
as
as
I
think
Annie
touched
on
as
well.
The
density
that
we're
requesting
is
far
less
than
what
we
could
put
on.
So
we
think
in
an
urban
level
and
contextually
in
the
neighborhood,
it's
nice.
H
So
we
got
dealing
with
some
some
paint
issues
on
the
site
and
the
other
one
we
wanted
attention
to
is
the
height
of
the
building.
So
we're
currently
in
a
35
foot
height
limit.
We
are
at
32,
but
we
have
bulkheads.
We
have
a
try
three
level
and
a
dual
level:
rooftop
deck
that
were
proposed,
and
so
we
have
a
bulkhead
and
the
bulkhead
is,
is
actually
access
up
to
these
roof
decks
and
also
to
get
vertical
shafts
down
for
HVAC
down
to
the
unit.
H
But
these
will
comprise
of
5.4
percent
and
they're.
The
massing
is
actually
in
the
middle
part
of
the
building,
so
we
feel
that
we're
taking
great
care
and
and
the
neighbors
to
the
east,
the
school
and
and
and
also
to
the
residential
which,
as
you
can
see,
on
the
safe
plan,
the
seven
unit
and
the
three
units
are
stepped
and
proposed
to
be
at
a
much
denser.
H
You
know
density
along
and
height
along
the
east
property
line,
so
those
are
the
two
areas
that
I
wanted
to
talk
about
and
touch
on
and,
and
we're
certainly
excited
to
be
making
a
mark
in
in
the
city
of
Tampa
and
look
for
other
opportunities.
We
open
up
for
any
questions.
E
O
Unfortunately,
while
you're
speaking
for
some
reason,
they
weren't
showing
the
images
on
the
Elmo.
So
if
you
could
just
show
so
that
the
public.
L
O
Q
H
Then
yeah
right,
that's
fine!
So
I
can
memorize
that
yeah.
So
there's
a
box
in
the
middle,
you
know
kind
of
long
linear
in
the
driveway,
and
this
is
what
I
was
talking
about
about
the
storm
retention
and
how
we're
solving
that
on
the
site
and
the
access
in
the
driveway.
H
And
again
you
see
if
Aaron
still
has
a
safe
plan
up.
We
have
the
seven
units
over
to
the
east
side
of
the
property
and
the
three
units
to
the
back,
mitigating
the
height
of
a
single
family
and
then,
of
course,
the
commercial
building
to
to
the
West.
H
And
then,
if
you
want
to
put
up
the
rendering
of
the
exterior,
maybe
from
the
East
side
on
the
school
side,
we
can
see
the
bulkhead
and
talk
about
the
issue
of
the
height
and
how
we're
mitigating
the
height
of
the
portion
of
the
the
building.
That's
at
38
feet
and
again.
The
bulkhead
is
for
stairwell
access,
light
access
into
the
floors
down
below
and
also
to
get
vertical
shaft
for
the
rooftop
AC
units
on
the
roof.
So
those
again
comprise
of
5.4
percent
of
the
overall
root
area.
Q
Q
H
H
H
Right
go
ahead.
H
F
E
We
have
to
see
you
visually
to
be
able
to
take.
Take
your
your
testimony.
Can
you
please
check
all
the
just
something
something
was
almost
happening.
S
No,
it's
not
I
had
it
set
up
already
too
so
I
couldn't
have
seen
and
I
was
seeing
me
myself
clearly
is.
E
R
C
S
So
I
have
something
I've
written
if
I
may
good
evening,
chairman
cypro
members
of
city
council.
Thank
you
for
allowing
me
the
time
to
talk
share
my
thoughts.
My
name
is
Marta
Rodriguez
Montero
I
live
at
4021
North
Lincoln
Avenue
I've
been
a
proud
resident
of
West
Tampa,
since
my
parents
moved
there
in
1971.,
I
love,
West
Tampa
for
its
history,
the
warmth
of
neighbors
who
take
care
of
each
other
like
family
and
certainly
for
its
location.
That
is
close
to
everything.
This
Tampa
is
an
old
neighborhood.
S
Sadly,
the
original
residents
are
passing
away,
but
new
families
are
now
learning
how
wonderful
it
is
to
live
in
West
Tampa.
For
years
now,
Builders
have
come
to
West
Tampa
torn
down
the
original
homes,
with
their
beautiful
porches
and
Big
Lots,
and
usually
build
multiple
two-story
houses
squeezed
into
the
land
that
previously
was
home
to
one
house
council
members,
my
special
especially
councilman,
Maniscalco
and
Miranda
you're,
aware
of
the
explosion
of
development
in
West
Tampa,
which
I
welcome.
S
Unfortunately,
the
older
residents
of
West
Tampa
did
not
know
to
consider
doing
what
residents
of
Seminole,
Heights
and
Hyde
Park
did
and
demand
that
new
construction
maintain
the
look
and
feel
of
original
West
Tampa
neighborhoods
West
Tampa
is
now
losing
its
character.
This
does
not
apply
to
all
the
new
homes
being
built,
some
are
being
built
with
porches
and
curves
and
warmth,
but
others
that
have
square
look
just
looks
out
of
place
across
Tampa.
S
These
10
new
townhouses
scheduled
to
be
built
on
Tampa
Bay
Boulevard
are
nice.
If
you're
looking
for
modern
style
homes,
they
are
square,
they
are
tall.
I
understood
that
I
understand
that
neighborhoods
change
change
can
be
good,
but
I
do
wish
these
new
townhouses
had
more
of
the
West
Tampa
design
and
feel
so
that
the
new
residents
could
also
feel
proud
of
living
at
West
Tampa
with
its
history,
warmth
and
location.
S
One
of
my
concerns
is
the
impact
the
new
town
houses
and
additional
residents
will
have
on
the
neighborhood,
including
traffic
on
Tampa
Bay
Boulevard,
which
is
only
two
lanes
and
is
the
primary
Street
for
Tampa
Bay
Boulevard
Elementary
School
school
is
Tampa
Bay,
Boulevard,
Elementary
School
and
for
all
events
of
Raymond
James
Taylor.
My
biggest
concern
with
these
10
townhouses
is
that,
in
addition
to
the
listed
three-story
unit
with
approximately
2600
square
feet,
it
also
advertises
the
most
unique
split
level:
roof
decks
for
privately
for
private
family
gatherings.
S
S
The
private
family
gatherings
will
have
the
opportunity
to
watch
the
children
at
play
or
just
walking
on
campus.
Private
family
gatherings
will
also
be
towering
over
and
looking
directly
down
at
the
single
family
pool
around
West
Side.
S
These
three-story
units
look
out
of
place,
but
I
understand
the
builders
want
to
build
more
on
small
spaces.
They
have
so
they
go
up,
but
what
I
post
is
these
homes
going
so
far
up
that
they're
not
being
able
to
look
down
at
the
children
at
my
neighbors
and
at
me
so
I
oppose
the
extra
hide
requested
and
the
proposed
roof
debt
for
family
gatherings.
I
do
welcome
all
new
developers
to
make
our
neighborhoods
look
better.
S
I,
just
don't
feel
comfortable
and
I
can
tell
you
that
I
have
spoken
with
many
other
neighbors
on
Lincoln
Avenue.
Thank
you.
E
Q
First
of
all,
I
appreciate
the
neighbors
thoughts,
a
couple
of
things
with
regards
to
traffic
on
Tampa
Bay,
Boulevard,
being
that
we
are
approximately
a
half
mile
east
of
Raymond,
James,
Stadium
I
think
the
ability
of
cars
to
come
and
go
has
already
been
designed
for
80
000
people,
the
additional
10
additional
homes
where
there
are
currently
two
properties,
I,
don't
think,
is
going
to
make
a
difference
as
far
as
the
overhangs
of
the
roof
decks.
They
do
not
look
out
on
the
school.
Q
If,
if
she
had
looked
at
the
site
plan,
they
actually
looked
onto
the
interior
of
the
courtyard
of
the
property
and
then
with
regards
to
fitting
into
the
neighborhood
I
know.
We
do
not
have
cars
parked
on
the
grass
driveways
and
no,
we
do
have
sidewalks
so
I.
Think
a
lot
of
the
improvements
that
we're
trying
to
bring
to
the
neighborhood
are
not
arbitrary
and
in
fact,
I
do
think
it
does
fit
into
the
culture
as
well
as
to
the
design
of
the
neighborhood.
L
Miranda
no
I'm
not
going
to
say
anything
regarding
the
zoning
but
I
think
the
item
that
was
said
about
parking
margin
on
the
grass
is
not
warranted.
It's
not
part
of
your.
Your
good
presentation
I.
Take
that
as
a
fence
to
West
Tampa
I'm,
going
to
give
you
I'm
not
giving
you
anything
but
good
advice,
booty
clothes.
C
I
found
a
more
easy:
that's
22-38,
what's
been
presented
for
first
reading
consideration
in
order
to
reselling
property
in
the
University
of
3201
West
Tampa
Bay
Boulevard
in
45
North,
Lincoln
Avenue
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning,
District
classifications,
rs50,
residential
single
family
and
PD
plan
development
to
PD
plan
development,
residential
single
family
attachment
providing
effective
date.
C
L
E
C
G
Amy
Barnes
development
coordination
item
number
eight
is
RZ
2240.
The
subject
property
is
located
at
110
South
Boulevard.
The
request
is
to
rezone
the
property
from
Office
Professional
to
plan
development
for
residential
multi-family
strip,
sock
strip
shopping
center
retail,
including
Bank
Drive-In,
with
office
uses
from
available.
Oh,
let
me
turn
over
to
a
planning
question.
After
their
presentation,
I'll
put
my.
J
Danny
Collins
again
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff,
I've,
been
sworn
in.
Our
last
case
is
within
the
central
Tampa
planning
district
and,
more
specifically,
it's
within
the
High
Park
Spanish
Creek
neighborhood.
The
subject's
site
is
also
within
the
CBD
peripheral
boundaries
and
it's
also
within
the
Hyde
Park
National
Historic
District
oops
transit
services.
Transit
service
is
provided
approximately
250
feet.
East
of
the
subject
site
along
West
Cleveland
Street,
West,
Cleveland
Street
is
served
by
heart.
J
J
J
The
surrounding
area
contains
a
mixture
of
uses.
West
Kennedy
Boulevard
is
one
block
north
of
the
site,
which
contains
predominantly
non-residential
uses,
and
then
there
are
some
residential
uses
within
a
couple
blocks.
West
of
the
subject
site
and,
like
I
said
it's
just
north
of
the
salmon
Expressway.
J
Here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
The
entire
subject
site
is
within
the
regional
mixed
use,
100
future
land
use
designation.
This
designation
allows
for
development
up
to
a
3.5,
far
or
112
units
per
acre.
As
I
noted
earlier,
the
site
is
within
the
CBD
peripheral
periphery,
which
allows
additional
density
on
the
subject
site
through
a
bonus
with
the
CBD
bonus.
The
subject
site
can
be
considered
for
up
to
220
units
per
acre
or
a
7.0
far
that
that,
of
course,
is
the
maximum
that
it
would
allow.
J
The
rmu
100
surrounds
the
subject
site
on
all
sides,
just
north
of
the
subject
cycle
on
Kennedy
Boulevard.
On
the
North
side,
our
parcel
is
recognized
under
the
umu
60
future
Lane
use
designation,
one
block
west
of
the
subject
site
our
Parcels
recognized
under
the
residential
35
future
land
use,
designation
and
then
about
a
half
block
south
of
the
subject.
Site
is
land
recognized
under
the
Community
mixed
use.
35
future
land
use
designation.
J
The
PD
proposes
just
just
under
279
000
square
feet
of
mixed
mixed
use:
development
at
an
overall,
far
6.3.4
6.34.
The
applicant
is
utilizing
the
the
CBD
periphery
bonus
to
achieve
additional
intensity
on
the
subject
site.
The
Planning
Commission
staff
reviewed
the
request
and
found
it
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
surrounding
area
surrounding
area
contains
a
range
of
building
Heights.
There
are
several
mid-rise
existing
buildings
or
that
were
previously
approved
in
the
vicinity
of
the
subject
site,
as
well
as
a
26
story.
J
Mixed-Use
building,
two
bucks
east
of
the
subject
site
at
the
intersection
of
West
Cleveland
Street
and
South
Cedar
Avenue.
The
PD
proposes
a
23-story
structure
which
is
comparable
and
within
the
ranges
of
surrounding
Towers
in
the
area.
The
subject
site
is
within
a
mixed
use,
Corridor,
as
defined
in
the
comprehensive
plan.
The
request
addresses
many
of
the
mixed
use,
Corridor
policies
by
providing
internal
pedestrian
connections
and
orienting
the
entrances
to
the
public
rights
of
way.
J
The
proposed
192
dwelling
units
will
also
provide
additional
housing
opportunities
for
Tampa's
growing
population
in
an
area
of
the
city
where
land
is
presently
underutilized.
The
new
the
new
housing
opportunities
would
also
be
adjacent
to
two
Transit
stops
within
a
half
a
mile
of
the
central
business
district
and
less
than
400
feet
south
of
the
University
of
Tampa.
J
In
conclusion,
the
requests
will
promote
a
residential
development
pattern,
consistent
with
the
compact
City
Forum
strategy,
with
increased
availability
of
housing
at
densities
that
promote
walking
and
Transit
use
near
employment,
centers
residential
services
and
amenities.
Furthermore,
the
request
is
consistent
with
the
density
anticipated
under
the
rmu
100
through
the
CBD
per
free
bonus.
This
concludes
my
presentation
available
for
any
questions.
G
The
Barnes
development
coordination
Rez
2240
is
a
request
to
rezone
property
at
110,
South
Boulevard
from
Office
Professional
to
plane,
development
for
residential
multi-family
shopping
center
retail,
including
a
bank
Drive-In.
The
applicant
is
requesting
six
waivers
associated
with
this
request.
G
G
G
However,
to
be
noted
that
when
reviewing
the
revised
site
plan
that
was
provided
or
prior
to
this
hearing,
there
is
a
bonus
provision
agreement
that
is
associated
with
this
request.
Those
numbers
I
know
the
applicant
will
update.
They
will
be
reduced
in
order
to
make
meet
that
6.34
far
the
applicant
in
accordance
with
Section
27-140.
G
The
applicant
will
provide
additional
amenities
that
we
apply
apply
to
a
capital,
Improvement
plan
project
or
similar
projects
within
the
area
staff
reviewed,
section
27136,
although
the
massing
in
the
height
wasn't
necessarily
it
was
compatible
with
the
area
and
the
current
development
in
the
area.
The
the
issue
was
the
number
of
waivers
requested,
especially
in
referencing
natural
resources
and
transportation
related
waivers.
G
This
is
the
site
and
it's
showing
some
of
the
cueing
for
the
bank,
Drive-In
and
I'm
sure
the
applicant
will
show
some
of
the
elevations.
This
is
just
Innovation,
provided.
G
This
is
looking
Northeast
from
the
site.
This
is
directly
behind
the
site
on
the
east
side,.
G
And
this
is
facing-
or
this
is
along
South
Boulevard,
Facing,
East
and
shown
here-
is
construction
and
buildings
in
the
downtown
vicinity
and
then
directly
south
is
the
salmon
Expressway
additionally
I
know
based
upon
the
square
footage
that
may
the
waiver
regarding
the
parking
will
be
amended
as
well,
so
it'll
be
a
47
reduction,
not
a
45
reduction
I'm
available
for
any
questions
you
might
have.
I
Great
so
with
me
here
this
evening,
our
Brad
Caldwell
and
Greg
Bender,
with
Devin
and
in
town
group
respectively,
who
are
the
developers
of
this
project,
also
Addie
Clark,
a
civil
engineer
with
my
Law
Firm,
is
here
and
initially
Ricky.
Puerto
Rico
is
certified.
Master
arborist,
who
assisted
on
this
project,
virtually
our
many
many
representatives
from
stantec
and
the
design
firm.
If
there
are
any
questions
regarding
that,
let's
jump
in
you've
seen
a
couple
maps
of
where
the
location
is
I
think
it
might
be
helpful
to
actually
zoom
out
of
it.
I
The
yellow
line
that
you
see
is
the
central
business
district
periphery.
The
red
star,
is
the
location
of
the
site
for
something
that's
as
impactful.
The
CBD
periphery
isn't
discussed
very
much
in
the
zoning
code
or
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
but
as
Danny
alluded
to,
it
allows
you
to
actually
double
the
amount
of
intensity
on
a
site
so
that
that's
pretty
significant
and
it's
like
for
Fairly
obvious
reasons
because
of
the
proximity
to
downtown
to
the
CBD
where
density
is,
is
functionally
unlimited,
limited
only
by
the
FAA.
I
So
areas
like
District
portions
of
Ybor,
City,
Encore,
Southern,
Tampa
Heights,
those
are
all
in
the
same
density
allotment
as
this
site.
I
think
that's
important
to
bear
in
mind
when
we
talk
a
little
bit
about
more
some
of
the
site
and
some
of
its
inconsistencies,
just
a
hair
under
an
acre.
We
are
one
block
south
of
the
UT
campus
and
I.
Think
it's
worth
noting
that
we
are
not
in
a
CRA.
We
are
not
in
an
overlay
District.
Nor
are
we
in
a
local,
historic
district.
I
This
is
I
think
the
site
is
literally
the
northernmost
piece
of
the
national
Hyde
Park
historic
district,
but
for
the
purposes
of
CB
that
that
is
not
very
relevant
not
to
get
anyone
too
dizzy
that
when
now
you're
looking
up
you're
looking
East
and
I
think
this
is
a
helpful
to
show
just
how
close
the
site
is
to
the
University
of
Tampa
and
as
I'll
talk
about
in
a
little
bit.
This
is
a
project
designed
and
will
be
marketed
towards
University
of
Tampa
students.
As
you
can
see,
it's
8.3
miles.
I
I
This
is
a
rendering
of
the
proposed
site
showing
the
bank
ozk
at
the
bottom.
That
is
where
the
2800
square
feet
of
retail
comes
from
they're,
going
to
be
182
dwelling
units,
that's
the
number
182.
The
site
plan
in
front
of
you
has
a
slightly
larger
number,
but
182
is
what
will
be
corrected
between
first
and
second
reading.
This
I
also
want
to
be
clear
in
the
interest
of
transparency
that
this
is
a
private
development.
This
is
not
affiliated
with
the
University
of
Tampa,
though
that
is
certainly
who
it
will
be
marketed
towards.
I
I
You'll
see
great,
so
up
is
North.
This
is
Fielding,
so
you
come
down
Fielding.
This
is
how
you're
gonna
from
a
vehicular
perspective,
enter
the
site
you're
going
to
go
through
here
or
you
can
keep
going
down
this
cutout
parcel.
We
do
not
own
That's,
the
souters,
Law,
Firm
I.
Believe
it's
1-800.
Hog
law
is
the
what
it's
best
known
by,
but
we
do
not
own
that
parcel.
That's
a
cut
out
here
so
you'll
come
around.
I
You
have
another
opportunity
to
get
into
the
site,
albeit
here
it's
really
just
for
the
bank,
so
you
can
drive
in
here
to
a
couple
of
parking
spaces.
More
importantly,
though,
this
is
a
drive
through
that
cuts
all
the
way
through
the
site,
and
you
can
exit
only
here.
One
of
the
most
interesting
features
I
think
about
this
project.
That's
been
unusual
for
Tampa
another,
maybe
larger
older
cities.
It's
common
is
it
does
have
a
pedestrian
Muse
muws.
I
I
So,
in
terms
of
the
existing
conditions,
Manny
walked
through
that
it's
a
Banco
ZK,
it's
going
to
be
a
bank
ozk
again,
albeit
with
the
student
housing
complex
on
top
of
it
in
terms
of
the
student
housing
need,
there
is
an
acute
how
there's
there's
a
cute
housing
shortage
that
stretches
across
a
lot
of
elements
of
the
city,
and
this
council
is
more
familiar
with
that
than
anyone.
I
But
in
terms
of
focusing
just
on
on
students
in
the
University
of
Tampa
student
population,
my
client
commissioned
a
private
Market
study
to
look
at
the
housing
student
demand
and
the
supplies.
It's
it's
fairly.
Straightforward,
math
I
can't
see
it
because
the
closed
captioning,
but
we
know
exactly
what
the
undergraduate
student
population
is
for
the
University
of
Tampa
of
11
600
full-time
students.
Ten
thousand
two
hundred.
We
know
that
the
University
of
Tampa
is
able
to
provide
5
000
beds
on
site.
I
We
know
that
there
are
1200
beds
for
off-campus
housing,
and
that
includes-
and
don't
want
to
be,
overly
presumptuous,
that
that
includes
this
project.
That
includes
some
other
projects
that
Council
has
approved
recently
that
aren't
even
under
construction.
Yet
that
still
leaves
a
deficit
of
4
000
beds
and
we
think
a
project
like
this.
It's
going
to
be
able
to
consolidate
a
decent
amount
of
the
student
population.
I
Let's
look
through
staff
support,
it's
Danny
alluded
to.
We,
we
do
have
a
consistency
finding
from
the
Planning
Commission,
which
is
obviously
very
important.
That's
the
Cornerstone
from
a
legal
perspective
of
a
silent
zoning
decision
and
several
reviewing
departments
from
the
city
of
Tampa
did
find
this
consistent,
like
with
any
project
that
I've
got
the
pleasure
of
bringing
before
this
Council
that's
in
the
CBD
periphery.
I
It
is
trying
to
utilize
the
density
that
is
afforded
by
that
accommodation,
it's
very
difficult
to
adhere
to
every
single
element
of
the
zoning
code,
and
so
we
have
some
waivers
in
your
record.
You
have
a
fairly
substantial
waiver
justification
memo,
as
well
as
a
memo
outlining
why
we
believe
we've
complied
with
the
PD
purpose,
Provisions
in
section
27-136,
but
you'll
indulge
me
like
to
walk
through
those
waivers
right
now.
I
First
is
buffering
so
in
the
code
parking
lots
are
referred
to
as
vehicular
use
areas
for
some
reason
and
they
have
their
own
separate
buffers
for
this
particular
type
of
parking
lot.
I
You
have
to
have
an
eight
foot
space
between
the
parking
lot
and
the
street
in
this
circumstance,
we're
asking
for
five
feet
and
a
lot
of
the
waivers
that
we
are
seeking
are
driven
by
the
fact
that
we
have
that
cut
through
the
building
that,
instead
of
a
single
Mass,
there
is
a
cut
through
that's
going
to
require
pushing
the
northern
piece
up.
Southern
piece
down.
I
Second,
is
setback.
This
is
a
little
bit
unusual
waiver.
Typically,
you
don't
see
waivers
for
setbacks
in
PDS,
because
one
of
the
main
reasons
to
do
a
PD
is
honestly
to
establish
your
own
setbacks
and
not
deal
with
the
setbacks
and
the
standard
zoning
districts.
But
the
code
contains
some
Provisions
about
certain
streets
in
Tampa
that
are
considered.
Special
Cleveland
is
one
of
them,
and
it
requires
a
42
foot
setback
from
the
center
line
of
Cleveland
to
the
property.
I
We
are
only
able
to
accommodate
36,
which
we
think
for
a
dense,
Urban
environment
like
this
is
entirely
appropriate.
Candidly.
The
the
significant
setback
requirements
are
really
a
bit
inconsistent
with
some
of
the
provisions
of
the
comprehensive
plan
that
talk
about
street-facing
orientation,
pedestrian
orientation
and
things
like
that.
I
This
is
an
exam.
This
is
a
sorry,
a
rendering
of
the
Muse
that
we
discussed.
What
that
cut
through
will
look
like
one
of
the
goals
here
is
to
avoid
too
much
of
a
pedestrian
traffic
on
Cleveland,
which,
though
it
has
a
speed
limit
of
35,
not
all
citizens
of
Tampa
honor
that
at
all
times,
and
it
can
be
a
bit
of
a
dangerous,
dangerous
road
for
UT
students
or
not
UT
students
for
anyone
to
walk.
I
So
that's
part
of
the
idea
of
trying
to
bring
that
pedestrian
East-West
traffic
into
an
internal
a
little
bit
of
a
safer
environment
trees.
We
do
have
one
tree
vapor
and
that
is
to
remove
a
single,
non-hazardous,
Grand
Tree.
It
is
located
towards
the
front
of
the
site
and
by
applying
the
protected
radius
of
that
tree
to
the
site.
After
two
reasonable
reconfiguration
attempts,
we
were
not
able
to
preserve
it.
Ricky
powderek
is
here
to
discuss
heavy
questions
about
what
this
reasonable
reconfiguration
attempts.
I
Electric
light
looked
like,
but
the
short
answer
is:
it
would
have
required
an
exceptionally
tall
building
that
would
have
been
maybe
far
out
of
character
and
also
limited
our
ability
to
accommodate
that
Muse.
That
I
talked
about
that
cuts
through
the
site.
I
would
note
that
and
we're
not
doing
this
by
enormous
amounts,
but
we
we
are
exceeding
the
the
parking
lot
green
space
requirement
slightly,
as
well
as
the
the
general
green
space
requirement
and
I'd
like
to
actually
make
one
more
note
on
the
trees.
I
I
So
we
are
doing
the
best
we
can
to,
in
light
of
the
fact
that
we
are
removing
one
Grand
Tree
replant
a
significant
number,
so
that
Boulevard
in
particular
and
Fielding,
to
the
extent
of
our
Frontage
there
on
the
right
side,
get
some
nice
kind
of
coverage
for
the
urban
canopy
that
we
know
Tampa
appreciates
loading
I,
don't
think
I've
ever
brought
to
this
Council
of
beauty.
I
That
does
not
have
a
loading
birth,
and
this
is
perhaps
one
of
the
best
justifications
I've
seen
these
units
are
all
going
to
be
furnished,
there's
really
no
circumstance
under
which
a
large
moving
truck
is
is
going
to
come
into
the
site.
Loading
bursts
have
an
enormous
opportunity
cost,
particularly
of
the
size
that
this
code
requires
of
being
12
by
60..
So
we
are
going
to
provide
one
12
by
30
loading
berth,
and
we
are
very
confident
that
that
is
going
to
be
adequate
to
serve
this
building.
I
I
So
if
this
exact
same
project
were
lifted
up
and
moved
five
blocks
east
across
the
river
into
downtown,
it
would
have
to
have
188
parking
spaces
if
it
was
an
Ebor
City
or
if
it
was
in
the
channel
District,
which
is
likewise
in
the
CBD
periphery.
It
would
be
required
to
have
191
spaces,
but
due
to
the
circumstances
of
its
location,
it
is
required
to
have
395
parking
spaces
for
a
project
that
is
going
to
be
designed
for
and
marketed
to,
students
who
attended
University
one
block
north.
I
We
think
parking
395
would
be
a
gross
amount
of
over
parking.
So
we
are
proposing
210
spaces,
12
of
which
would
go
to
the
retail
the
bank
that's
going
to
remain
on
site
and
the
remainder
of
which
would
serve
the
student
population
as
Greg
can
discuss
in
a
little
bit
based
on
his
experience,
developing
private
student
housing
projects
in
Tampa
for
UT
students,
parking
they've
had
a
hard
time
filling
parking
that
they
have
at
the
Henry,
which
is
downtown
and
several
blocks
away.
Not
one
block
away
like
this
project.
I
Sorry
I
think
the
parking
established
I
like
to
use
the
remain
anytime
I
have
for
Greg
to
come
up
and
talk
a
little
bit
about
his
experience.
T
Leaving
city
council,
my
name
is
Greg
minder,
2915,
West,
Bay,
Court,
Avenue
and
I
have
been
sworn
I've,
had
the
opportunity
to
develop
multiple
projects
in
the
city
of
Tampa
and
I'm
developing
multiple
projects.
Now,
with
my
partners,
development,
Ventures
group,
we
most
recently
developed
the
Henry
on
the
North
End
of
downtown,
but
also
Sky
Point
element,
500
Harbor,
Islands,
multiple
other
land
use.
Changes
in
the
area
learned
a
lot
about
a
couple,
different
aspects
of
design
and
we
feel
really
important
to
projects
as
the
area
becomes
more
and
more
pedestrian
friendly.
T
We
wanted
to
focus
our
project
on
The
Pedestrian
and
not
necessarily
on
vehicles,
especially
given
the
fact
that
our
student
primary
student
population
in
the
area
is
more
adapt
to
using
pedestrian
traffic
foot
traffic,
lime,
scooters,
bicycles,
Etc,
instead
of
their
vehicles
to
to
commute
to
and
from
the
campus
as
Tyler
mentioned.
We
finished
the
Henry
just
over
a
year
ago,
and
that
project
we
built
through
approximately
300
parking
spaces
for
the
student
population.
In
that
building
of
188
Apartments.
T
We've
only
been
able
to
lease
about
two-thirds
of
those
parking
spaces
somewhere
between
two-thirds
and
three
quarters.
It
represents
about
1.18
parking
spaces
per
unit
in
that
building
of
actually
occupied
parking.
What
we
built
or
designed
to
build
in
this
building
would
be
approximately
1.15
parking
spaces
for
every
unit,
very
similar
in
ratio,
but
slightly
less
and
a
much
closer
project
to
campus.
T
Because
of
that,
we
think
that
that
does
justify
a
little
bit
more
of
why
we're
making
the
parking
requesting
the
parking
waiver
it's
based
on
experience
and
actual
demand,
rather
than
just
trying
to
you
know
gauge
the
market
or
focus
group
The
Market.
We
actually
have
experience
in
doing
it.
We
run
a
shuttle
from
that
property.
This
property
here
won't
use
the
shuttle
or
need
a
shuttle
because
of
its
proximity.
It
would
actually
take
longer
to
drive
to
campus
than
it
would
to
walk
right.
So
that's
another
reason
for
that
justification.
T
Some
of
the
design
elements
that
Tyler
mentioned
were
The
Pedestrian
access
to
through
the
block
itself,
but
also
we've
developed
or
designed
into
our
project
and
development.
A
front
porch
that
really
mimics
the
character
of
Hyde
Park
and
brings
in
an
opportunity
for
students
to
meet
and
greet
their
friends
and
visitors
to
the
building
at
the
front
porch
of
the
building,
instead
of
just
a
set
of
doors
that
empty
out
directly
under
the
street.
T
That's
important
for
us
because
we
felt
like
that
was
a
way
of
warming
up
the
building
and
giving
an
opportunity
for
the
building
to
face
the
street
with
some
active
uses
when
we're
kind
of
limited
in
the
amount
of
retail
storefront
that
really
is
available
to
us.
We
have
a
bank
branch,
that's
occupying
the
southwest
corner
of
the
property,
but
Fielding
doesn't
represent
much
of
an
opportunity
for
retail
or
active
storefront
use.
The
balance
of
the
space
along
along
Boulevard
was
necessary
for
accessing
the
ability,
both
from
Building
Services
standpoint
and
also
for
The
Pedestrian.
T
Lastly,
I'll:
let
you
know
that
we've
got
you
know
a
lot
of
experience
in
developing
and
core
downtown
and
periphery,
areas
of
downtown
Lake,
Harbor
Island
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
have
regarding
the
project.
We
feel
very
confident
this
will
serve
the
community
very
well.
We
know
that
there's
tremendous
demand
and
one
of
the
other
comments
I
wanted
to
quickly
make
is
we've
watched.
The
area
around
here
continue
to
grow
in
market
rate
demand,
while
the
student
population
continues
to
get
squeezed
out.
T
O
I
had
a
question:
I
am
I'm
fine
with
the
parking
density.
My
concern
is
with
the
sidewalks.
So
if
you
could
explain
the
the
width
of
the
sidewalks
on
on
both
Cleveland
and
North
Boulevard.
T
The
sidewalk
along
Boulevard,
because
the
we
don't
actually
aren't
redeveloping
the
entire
Block,
it's
consistent
with
the
existing
sidewalks
there
and
again
we
wanted
to
make
sure
we
had
an
opportunity
to
meet
the
street
with
that
front.
Porch
that
piece
itself
kind
of
extends
the
sidewalk
in
a
lot
of
ways.
Instead
of
doing
it,
a
grade
which
we
could
have
done,
we
elevated
it
slightly
like
the
front.
Porch
is
a
Hyde
Park,
giving
it
a
little
bit
more
character
and
a
little
bit
of
a
space
that
felt
separated
from
the
street.
T
Now
we
could
have
actually
put
those
all
a
grade,
but
I
thought
that
would
have
been
missing
a
lot
of
that
character
and
opportunity
for
uniqueness
for
this
project.
So
based
on
the
fact
that
south
of
here
really
is
the
crosstown
Expressway
in
Cleveland,
didn't
feel
like
beyond
our
front
door.
We
were
going
to
increase
the
amount
of
pedestrian
traffic
south.
O
T
I
do
I
have
to
because
I'm
blind
now
I
have
to
read
my
my
site
plan
I
believe
our
scale
is
approximately
oh.
Thank
you.
Yeah
we're
six
feet:
six
foot
wide
sidewalk
with
a
landscape
element
along
Boulevard
and
on
the
on
the
Cleveland
side,
because
that's
a
very
heavy
vehicular
roadway,
we're
five
feet
but
again
there's
a
slight
there's:
a
small
pedestrian
or
a
landscape
zone
between
there
and
the
street.
Okay.
N
The
council,
thank
you,
thank
you
for
your
vision
and
work.
You've
done
in
downtown
thanks,
so
just
on
the
parking
Point
again
so
that
you,
you
both
explained
a
lot
about
it,
but
just
in
case
somebody,
five
years
from
now
says
that
stupid
city
council
wanted
they
approved
this.
Just
one
more
question
about
it.
Sure
you
have
a
lot
of
experience.
N
Obviously,
with
with
I
mean
you
really
were
the
the
modern
Catalyst
for
development
of
downtown,
but
when
we
a
year
ago,
so
we
started
charging
for
parking
in
the
northern
side
of
downtown
and
the
people
in
your
two
buildings
that
you
develop
a
long
time
ago
element
the
other
one.
Several
folks
complained
to
us
and
sent
us
like
scathing
emails.
N
One
of
them
said
now
my
girlfriend
is
going
to
have
to
pay
for
parking
and
I
asked
the
people
in
the
city,
and
they
said
well,
there's
plenty
of
parking
in
those
buildings.
They
must
not
want
to
pay
for
it.
What's
your
what's
your
view
on
this
I
know,
you
mentioned
the
other
project
that
you've
done
recently,
but
is
you
know
what
what's
the
what's
the
market
demand
for
this
and
and
and
how
would
how
would
parking
work?
T
Well,
it's
interesting.
You
know
it's
a
very
good
question,
because
the
target
market
for
a
product
actually
determines
a
lot
of
that
parking
ratio
in
my
mind
and
we're
watching
a
population
of
young
adults
18
to
22
years
old,
who
are
the
mobility
options
for
them,
especially
in
this
location,
are,
are
numerous
right,
they're,
they're,
much
more
adapt
and
Adept
at
using
Uber
and
Lyft.
They
use
scooters
like
crazy.
They
they
walk
everywhere.
They
they'll
bicycle
everywhere.
T
They
they
choose
to
do
those
kind
of
things,
because
they
actually
have
a
lot
of
services
that
are
that
are
brought
to
them.
Tyler
mentioned
Uber
Eats
other.
You
know
systems
of
accessing
things
from
the
inside
outside
approach.
When
it
comes
to
the
actual
parking
demand,
it
has
cost
of
that
parking
has
an
influence
over
how
many
people
and
how
many
cars
end
up
in
a
building
and
also
again
back
to
the
number
of
the
uses.
T
Apartments
tend
to
be
unassigned
right,
so
those
have
a
little
bit
more
of
an
opportunity
for
float
within
the
parking
garage
or
flexibility
within
the
parking
garage,
because
not
everybody's
home,
all
the
time
and
not
everybody
is
in
in
their
unit
people
on
vacation
people
traveling
for
work.
Whatever
that
reason
is
it
kind
of
brings
it
down,
although
you
have
to
allocate
those
the
number
of
spaces
based
on
the
potential
demands
kind
of
like
building
for
the
Walmart
parking
lot
at
Christmas
time
right,
you
build
kind
of
the
larger
number
rather
than
the
smaller
number.
T
When
it
comes
to
the
student
population,
we've
really
tracked
this
heavily.
We
spent
a
lot
of
time
looking
at
our
actual
demand
based
on
you
know
our
product
at
the
Henry
and
being
a
little
bit
further
away
from
campus
and
operating
a
shuttle.
We
expected
a
lot
more
students
to
to
take
us
up
on
the
parking
opportunity.
T
Campus
parking
is
unavailable
for
freshmen
and
it's
it's
fully
subscribed
for
all
sophomores
through
seniors
and
grad
students,
given
all
that
we
we
expected
to
have
a
lot
more
demand,
but
what
we're
hearing
and
we're
seeing
it
both
at
our
actual
lease
numbers
and
our
our
surveys
and
our
discussions
with
students,
fewer
and
fewer
of
them-
are
bringing
their
cars
because
the
only
reason
they
have
them
is
to
go
out
to
the
beach.
That's
really
the
primary
reason
that
someone
brings
their
car
here.
T
In
fact,
our
65
percent
of
the
student
population
of
the
University
of
Tampa
is
from
the
Northeast.
It's
not
driving
home,
they're,
typically
flying
home,
so
cars
themselves
really
are
opportunities
to
go
to
farther
flung
places
than
they
would.
You
know
normally
Uber
or
Lyft,
or
scooter
Etc
long
story.
To
explain
that
you
know
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
studying
various
Target
markets
over
our
you
know,
Development
Career
in
downtown
I've
watched
parking
ratios
and
demand
decrease
over
time.
T
It
used
to
be
that
our
financing
groups,
Banks
primarily,
would
push
our
parking
ratios
up
as
high
as
they
could,
believing
that
we're
a
driving
city
which
we
are
that
that
we
needed
higher
parking
ratios
I
think
it's
a
mixed
bag
when
it
comes
to
the
feedback
that
you've
gotten,
because
certain
you
hear
a
vocal
minority
of
people
who
have
a
problem
with
it
and
a
silent
majority
that
are
fine
with
the
parking
ratios
we
have.
That
would
be
the
kind
of
the
answer.
T
I
would
give
I'd
give
it
a
little
shorter
than
me,
but
that's
the
full
reason
why
we
have
a
parking
ratio.
We
do.
E
Other
question
for
the
petitioner
I
have
one:
this
is
22
22
floors,
yes
with
a
penthouse.
Yes,
I
want
to
party
with
that
I
want
to
party
with
that
student
who's
who's
going
to
be
able
to
have
a
penthouse.
E
C
E
E
T
One
of
the
things
the
Planning
Commission
noted
was
that
the
area
has
a
lot
of
structures
that
are,
for
lack
of
word,
inefficient
for
the
use
of
the
land
area
that
they've
been
designated
for
in
their
future
use
right.
That's
why
the
CBD
periphery
overlay
is
is
on
this.
This
area
in
this
property,
it's
to
be
a
transitional
space
between
a
suburban
area
to
an
urban
area.
22
stories
relative
to
downtown
is
not
very
tall.
22
stories
to
the
adjacent
existing
uses
is
is
a
little
bit
taller.
T
Altice
is
not
very
much
shorter
to
the
east.
There
are
approved
projects
that
are
much
taller
in
the
same
zoning
district,
one
just
recently
traded
it
and
sold
the
Lafayette
Square
property,
which
is
approved
by
this
Council
many
years
ago,
and
it
is
you
know,
I
think
they're
allowed
to
go
up
to
liking
on
the
numbers,
pretty
dull
yeah
350
400
feet,
and
then
there
was
there's
another
property
with
that
sits
on
Cedar
that
has
been
approved
for
about
25
stories
or
26
stories,
all
in
the
same
zoning
District.
T
So
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
difference
between
what's
there
today.
What's
Allowed
by
land
use
and
what's
already
approved,
that
it
hasn't
necessarily
been
built.
So
when
we
approached
this,
we
looked
at
those
we
actually
had
some
imagery
associated
with
that.
We
think
it's
consistent
because
we're
by
pushing
the
building
a
little
bit
taller
and
allowing
the
ground
plane
to
do
what
it's
doing
on
the
site.
I
think
we
create
a
better
Urban
environment
for
that
corner
and
it's
I
think
it's
an
anchoring
corner
to
the
district
I
think
it
sets
a
tone.
T
I
think
that
the
height,
if
architecturally
treated
well
at
the
ground
floor
is
less
significant
than
than
than
you
know
how
that
ground
floor.
That
building
meets
the
street.
How
does
it
feel
when
the
and
what
is
the
character
and
use
at
the
ground
level?
Is
it
active?
Does
it
do
the
things
I
mentioned
to
you?
L
Go
on
this
piggyback
story,
but
when
you,
when
you
speak
about
that
area,
that
you're
talking
about
the
buildings
that
you're
talking
about
at
the
time
they
were
built,
they
were
built
according
to
what
was
needed
right.
So
the
difference
is
now
the
buildings
that
you
need
are
coming
up
with
a
building
which
you
need
now.
L
The
University
of
Tampa,
certainly
60
years
ago,
40
years
ago,
had
a
population
of
sometimes
you
know,
800
a
thousand
two
thousand
now
the
University
of
Tampa's
population
and
students
is
larger
than
Princeton
and
Wake
Forest
yeah
I,
don't
know
if
you
know
that,
but
these
are
the
things
that
are
happening
around
not
only
that
area
but
around
most
of
the
areas
of
downtown.
When
you
go
back
and
look
at
analyze
downtown
25
years
ago
there
was
600
people
plus
six
walking
the
streets
and
then
we're
looking
to
get
into.
L
600
were
so
now
it's
grown
to
over
twenty
thousand
thirty
thousand,
so
the
population
and
the
buildings
come
only
if
they're
needed
nobody's
going
to
finance
a
building
and
build
a
building
and
they
think
they're
going
to
be
empty.
L
It
happens
how
it
is
and
that's
what
life
is
all
about.
I
mean
things:
change
I've
changed
I've
gotten
younger,
but
these
are
the
things
that
happen
in
life
and
you
have
to
be
cognizant
of
the
fact
that
around
you,
you
got
to
realize
what's
happening
to
understand,
what's
happening.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
T
L
E
E
L
You
very
much
Miranda's
finding
up
with
me.
You
don't
understand
anything
else:
item
number
eight
phone
number,
Rez
22-40.,
moving
owners
being
presented
for
first
reading
and
ordinance
rezoning
property
agenda.
G
I'm,
so
sorry,
Annie
barnstalling
coordination,
I
just
want
on
the
record
and
I
can
give
it
to
legal
as
well.
G
S
E
G
F
L
E
L
Councilman
Brandon.
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr
chairman
file,
number
eight
phone
number,
Rec
22-40
move
orders
being
presented
for
first
reason:
consideration
enormous
rezoning
property,
General
vicinity
of
one
one;
zero
South
Boulevard
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
more
particularly
scrapping
section
one
from
zoning
districts,
classification,
op,
Office,
Professional,
PD,
plan
development,
residential
multi-family
strip
shopping
center,
retail
Banks
Drive-In,
providing
an
effective
date
along
with
the
items
that
Ms
Barnes
put
in
regarding
the
waivers
and
regarding
the
square
footage.
O
E
C
E
O
O
And
I
had
a
second
I
want
to
make
a
motion
requesting
that
on
October
and
I.
Don't
have
a
calendar
in
front
of
me.
O
So
if
the
clerk
has
a
particular
date,
yes,
October
6th
I
want
to
make
a
motion
requesting
that
on
October,
6th
development
and
growth
management
staff
and
the
city's
legal
department
appear
before
city
council
and
give
an
update
and
status
report
about
file
number
cm21-69
408.
The
publicly
initiated
text
Amendment
to
the
Good
Neighbor
noticed
requirements
that
was
initiated
in
June
of
2021
and
detail
where
it
is
in
the
process
and
the
next
steps
that
need
to
be
taken.
E
Councilman
Moran
matisco.
H
Thank
you
very
much.
I
have
a
motion.
This
is
a
request
by
the
Planning
Commission
to
send
an
adoption
hearing
for
ta
CPA
22-09
on
September
8
2022
at
501
pm
and
direct
the
legal
department
to
provide
the
city
clerk
with
the
form
of
notice
for
advertising.
The
public
hearings.
H
T
Excuse
me
Guido
Miranda,
just
what,
if
I
may
please
just
something
I
mentioned
earlier
today
for.
Q
The
family
of
the
late
judge,
Robert
Foster,
just
Commendation
second.
E
N
Yes,
I
wonder
if,
if
you
all
would
allow
us
to
give
a
posthumous
accommodation
to
Rick
nafe
and
and
do
it
in
person
so
that
his
family
could
be
here,
and
you
all
know
who
he
was.
You
know
he's
such
a
big
guy,
but
a
giant
in
in
what
he
contributed
to
this
community
and
how
he
changed
this
community.
So
I'd
like
to
make
that
motion
when's.
The
next
accommodation
meeting.
O
E
Excuse
me
a
request
from
program
director
of
wmnf
Miss
Laura
Taylor's
asked
to
write
a
letter
proposing
from
the
city
council
to
propose
or
help
propose,
bringing
back
tropical
Heat
Wave
Music
Festival
to
Ybor
City.
It
has
not
been
around
for
several
years.
It
began
in
1981..
E
I
would
like
for
this
to
come
from
all
of
city,
council
and
I'm,
just
looking
to
see
if
we're
okay,
with
a
letter
of
recommendation
from
Tampa
City
Council,
to
bring
back
tropical
Heatwave.
E
E
L
E
All
right
with
that
councilman
Goods
yeah,
you've
never
heard
of
tropical
heat
wave.
What.
K
H
O
H
E
It's
not
a
motion.
I
just
wanted
to
get
get
my
feeling
out
and
and
I'll
bring
it
back
after
I
get
some
information
for
councilman
Miranda
next
Thursday,
but
I
do
want
to
present
a
accommodation
to
Cheryl
Pullins
Cheryl
Pullins
has
been
a
pillar
in
the
community
for
over
20
years,
providing
coaching
mentoring
and
Leadership
free
for
women
in
the
Tampa
area.
She
represents
the
brown
stem
girl,
an
organization
designed
to
increase
the
visibility
of
women
and
girls
of
color
in
stem.
E
She
has
even
served
as
a
mentor
to
a
13
year
old,
who
has
made
history
as
the
youngest
person
in
the
United
States
ever
to
be
accepted
into
medical
school
and
who
has
at
12,
become
the
youngest
intern
ever
for
NASA.
My
motion
is
to
present
accommodation
to
Cheryl
Pullins
for
being
recognized
for
a
presidential
Lifetime
Achievement
Award
for
her
work
with
brown
stem
girl
organization
on
September
6
2022
at
9
00
a.m,
We.