►
From YouTube: TCC PM 9/8/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
C
C
C
E
G
This
is
the
september
8
2022
evening
meeting
of
the
tampa
city
council
of
kent
city
council
chambers,
on
the
third
floor
of
old
city
hall,
315
east
kennedy
boulevard
here
in
tampa
florida.
The
public
is
able
to
attend
this
meeting
in
person
or
to
view
it
by
cable,
television,
respect
on
spectrum,
channel
640
or
frontier
channel
15
or
by
the
internet
via
www.tampa.gov.
I
G
I
E
H
Allowing
councilman
vera
to
attend.
E
By
councilman
miranda
all
in
favor
and
let
the
record
reflect
that
councilman
carlson
has
now
joined
us,
so
then
we
will
be
taking
all
votes
by
roll
call.
Yes,
thank
you.
Our
first
agenda
item.
We
are
going
to
be
speaking,
something
that
councilman
irtak
wanted
to
hear.
G
Good
evening,
brad
bear
deputy
administrator
of
infrastructure.
If
I
could
get
the
presentation
pulled
up.
Please,
okay,
thank
you,
I'm
here
to
give
a
brief
presentation
about
the
southeast
seminole
heights
flooding
relief
project
with
update
from
action
since
last
week
when
we
briefed
you.
G
G
The
work
zone-
litter
has
been
probably
our
number
one
complaint,
as
many
of
you
know,
the
outfall
structure
sticking
up
and
what
we're
going
to
do
around
the
outfall
structure,
west
crest,
avenue,
restoration,
communications
in
general
and,
of
course,
the
florida
avenue
closure
that
we've
recently
recently
closed
fort
avenue.
G
G
G
This
outfall
structure
is
27
feet
by
27
feet
by
13
and
a
half
feet
deep,
that
is
a
baffle
box
plus
a
has
trash
collector
screens
to
collect
the
trash,
because
the
the
basin
is
rather
large.
G
It
goes
all
the
way
east
of
the
interstate,
so
for
starters,
we'll
certainly
paint
it
grass
green
to
to
match
the
you
know
landscaping
around
it
and
blend
in
we're
going
to
you
know
it
was
originally
designed
to
stick
up
12
inches
to
prevent
automobiles
from
from
pulling
up
on
it
because
of
the
lids
are
not
designed
for
that
kind
of
loading,
but
we're
going
to
change
that
and
bring
it
up
another
six
inches.
G
And
then
you
know
finish
it
off
with
landscaping
and
so
the
landscaping
you
can
see
a
picture
of
what's
called
pink,
mulley
grass
and
inside
as
well,
that
we'll
put
around
the
structure
to
help
soften
it
and
then
we'll
talk
to
our
art
folks
about
putting
some
possible
artwork
on
the
river
face
to
also
you
know,
make
it
look
more
aesthetically
pleasing,
there's
not
a
lot
of
concrete
face
to
that
structure,
but
we'll
see
if
we
can
do
something
there
and
then.
G
Finally,
we
we
will
also
have
bollards
installed
in
front
of
that
at
the
end
of
the
drive
with
the
chain
across
so.
G
So
the
west
crest,
what
restoration
in
particular
the
300
block,
because
those
residents
have
endured
the
most
you
can
see
with
the
picture
there,
that
we
had
to
relocate
two
sanitary
sewers,
a
water
line
before
we
can
put
in
the
box
covert,
which
is
including
the
walls,
is
actually
an
eight
by
five
box
culvert.
G
So
it's
it's
large.
You
know
sections
of
concrete
culvert,
so
we
were
waiting.
We
were
hoping
to
save
two
grand
trees
that
were
located
in
this
section
of
crest.
We
were
not
able
to
save
them,
so
we
had
to
get
a
permit
to
remove
them
to
build
the
curb.
So
that's
why
we've
had
delays
with
that
curb
there.
G
G
So
and
then
completed
on
probably
the
following
monday
to
where
they
can
and
then
they
can
start
or
go
back
to
installing
the
curb
and
gutter
on
the
300
block,
with
the
first
layer
of
asphalt
installed
for
that
whole
block
by
the
end
of
this
month.
G
So
that's
a
plan
so,
and
this
is
between
highland
and
the
river,
if
you're,
you
know
not
familiar
with
the
with
crest
in
that
area
and
then
crest
in
the
two
blocks
between
highland
and
florida,
scheduled
for
the
first
layer
of
asphalt
by
the
end
of
october.
G
The
name
of
the
firm
is
dialogue.
Some
of
you
may
be
familiar
yesterday.
Nelson
construction
and
dialogue
went
door
to
door
on
crest
avenue
and
provided
door
hanger
information
as
as
well
as
was
able
to
talk
to
over
half
of
them
personally
about
you
know
their
situation
and
what
we
can
do
to
improve
their
situation,
as
well
as
the
businesses
on
florida
avenue,
and
it
was
time
well
spent.
G
That's
the
you
know
the
four
or
the
three
additional
areas
to
crest.
This
could
be
a
weekly
or
bi-weekly,
depending
on
the
status
change
of
those
areas,
we're
offering
to
meet
monthly
with
the
three
neighborhood
association
presidents.
So
far
one
of
them
have
accepted
for
september
22nd.
I
believe
so.
Try
to
you
know
informal
meetings
at
least
once
a
month
with
the
neighborhood
association
presidents,
you
know,
have
a
coffee
meeting,
that
kind
of
thing
and
then
hopefully
transition
to
quarterly
in
2023,
but
we'll
play
that
by
year.
G
G
In
addition
to
that,
we're
working
with
hillsborough
high
school
to
schedule
a
public
meeting
for
thursday
september
29th
at
six
o'clock
in
the
school's
auditorium.
We
do
have
a
verbal
commitment
on
that
date.
We're
awaiting
the
paperwork.
The
this
town
meeting
will
be
for
all
the
project
area.
You
know
whether
it's
you
know
existing
construction
or
or
future
construction,
north
of
hillsboro
or
east
of
the
interstate.
G
They
will
also
provide
frequent
updates
on
the
project
website.
At
least
two
project
updates
a
week.
These
go
to
everyone,
that's
on
the
project,
team's
email
subscriber
list.
So
please,
if
you
have
residents
calling
in
you,
know,
ask
them
to
please
sign
up
on
the
subscriber
list.
I
think
we
have
161
people
so
far
so
and
they're
very
appreciative
of
getting
that
information
on
a
regular
basis.
We've
been
averaging
about
five
posts.
G
They
had
been
averaging
about
five
posts
per
month,
so
we're
going
to
double
that
to
about
10
posts
a
month
and
then
we'll
update
the
project
schedule
on
the
website.
Monthly.
G
This
has
been
extended
to
september
23rd,
to
take
care
of
some
added
work
so
and
that
two-week
closure
is
to
take
our
two-week
additional
time
is
to
take
care
of
and
replace
1100
feet
of
a
12-inch
water
main
that
we
discovered
was
less
than
two
feet
deep,
two
feet
of
cover,
so
it's
a
1960s
era,
water
line
and
the
as
built
showed
it
at
three
feet
deep.
It
was
not
when
we
potholed
it
ahead
of
doing
this
construction,
so
we'll
take
care
of
that.
G
The
businesses
closest
to
the
excavation
have
expressed
concerns
for
parking
for
their
patrons
they've,
been
blocked
by
project
and
non-project
related
vehicles.
So
nelson
did
put
a
flagger
at
the
north
end
to
back
in
some
of
the
delivery
trucks
and
be
able
to
take
the
front
end
loaders
with
the
pipe
to
the
excavation
area.
But
when
we
walked
the
job
yesterday
with
the
businesses
at
the
south
end,
they
asked
for
a
flagger
at
the
south
end,
so
we're
going
to
start
that
tomorrow.
G
So
they're
pretty
happy
about
that
and
let's
see
the
project
team
is
working
closely,
of
course,
with
city
staff
to
continue
issue
traffic
advisories.
They
will
issue
a
traffic
advisory
for
the
extension.
G
J
I
appreciate
the
update.
I
also
got
an
update
from
the
the
presidents
of
the
affected
areas
saying
that,
and
this
literally
came
last
night,
the
accumulation
of
daily
litter
has
not
stopped,
and
I
I
got
a
text
just
30
minutes
ago
from
a
neighbor
who
said
that
the
the
litter
hasn't
abated,
but
the
safety
issues
are
alarming.
I
have
a
photo
that
she
has
of.
Apparently
today
they
strapped
a
compromised
power
line
pole
to
machinery
right
outside
of
her
house.
J
I
really
appreciate
the
things
that
you
have
done.
I
do
understand
that
adding
two
weeks
to
the
scope
makes
things
more
difficult
so
by
adding
the
flaggers.
That
was
a
great
idea.
I
really
do
appreciate
that.
I
also
appreciate
the
hillsborough
high
school
public
meeting.
That's
going
to
occur,
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
they
are
also
concerned
about
is
the
existing
storm
drains
being
cleaned.
This
is
one
of
the
things
that
that
they
specified
yesterday
last
night
in
the
email
it
said.
J
It
doesn't
say
who
this
was
from,
but
someone
sent
a
email
complaining
about
litter
and
the
response
was
we
apologize
for
the
litter.
We
have
a
crew
member
sweeping
the
entire
project,
but
we
are
in
the
process
of
cleaning
out
the
storm
drains
throughout
all
the
areas
of
the
project
and
that
was
sent
on
this
september
3rd.
So
I
don't
know
where
they
are
in
that,
but
considering
that
we
we're
having
these,
I
heard
five
days
of
rain.
J
Yes,
I'm
hoping
that
was
done
before
this
rain
started,
or
that
it
can
continue
to
be
done
so
that
those
areas
experience
experience
less
flooding,
but
I'm
I'm
still
not.
I
I
appreciate
what
you've
done
and
I
think
maybe,
if
you
come
back
in
a
couple
of
weeks,
so
we
can
get
an
update
from
from
the
citizens
on
on
how
everything
is
going.
J
K
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
thank
you,
councilmember
hertek
and
thank
you,
mr
baird
you're,
always
very
responsive
and,
as
you
know,
back
in
2016
I
was
a
pain
in
the
you-know-what
on
the
storm
water
vote
and
ended
up
being
the
swing
boat
on
this
city-wide
storm
water
improvement
projects
which
now
we're
at
the
seminole
heights
park,
and
you
know
sometimes-
and
this
is
not
you
or
anybody
in
the
city,
but
sometimes
I
feel
like
a
babysitter
and
I'm
talking
about
the
contractor,
I'm
talking
about
the
trash
that
is
left
behind.
K
I
understand
they're
saying:
oh,
we
have
somebody
picking
up
the
litter
at
the
end
of
the
day
and
whatnot,
but
I
don't.
I
don't
throw
a
toothpick
out
my
car
window.
I
don't
leave
trash
on
the
ground.
You
know
I
have
a
plastic
bottle
of
water
either
I
reuse
it
or
I
recycle
it,
but
you
don't
see
me
throwing
stuff
around,
say
I'll,
come
and
pick
it
up
later.
It's
just
not
in
my
nature,
so
these
individuals
that
are
earning
a
lot
of
money
because
remember
this
is
part
of
a
251
million
dollar
project.
K
This
is
not
cheap,
the
least
they
can
do
is
not
throw
trash
on
the
ground.
I
understand
it's
a
construction
site,
but
it's
a
residential
area
and
these
are
people's
houses
and
children
are
there
and
people
with
disabilities
and
whatnot,
so
the
least
they
can
do
is
pick
up
their
trash.
I
mean
to
have
somebody
come
around
and
pick
up
the
litter
just
can't
they
have
a
wastebasket
somewhere
a
bag
somewhere
where
they
can
put
stuff
in.
So
I
hope
that
that
they
are,
you
know,
being
cleaner.
K
I
know
that
the
businesses
are
affected
on
florida,
avenue
I've
gone
through
there.
You
have
to
either
walk
from
one
of
the
side
streets.
I
usually
park
in
my
friend's
house
over
on
fryerson
and
I
walk
over
but
they're.
You
know
they're
struggling
because
these
large
trucks
are
parking
in
front
of
their
business
for
the
little
parking
that
they
do
have
the
other
day.
K
A
mr
spattachini
who
owns
spatty's
coffee
on
florida,
posted
some
photos
to
to
facebook
that
I
that
I
saw
with
massive
trucks
parked
in
front
of
the
business
I
reached
out
to
the
contractor
at
nelson.
Personally,
the
response
was:
oh,
there
were
trucks
from
frontier.
I
know
that
frontier
has
a
a
building
right
there,
but
they
weren't
frontier
vehicles.
They
were
unmarked,
semi
trucks
essentially-
and
it's
like
I
have
the
photo
proof
here.
Just
just
tell
me
the
truth,
but
you
know
I
appreciate
that.
K
There's
going
to
be
two
flaggers
now
starting
tomorrow.
I
know
it's
going
to
be
raining
miserably
the
next
few
days,
so
the
flagger
on
the
south
and
north
end
will
help
in
alleviating
the
the
the
blockage
of
the
parking
the
trees
charlene
from
south
seminole
heights
had
asked
about
the
permits
and
everything,
and
I
see
that
weather
permitting
the
9th
and
the
12th
so
that
will
get
taken
care
of
you've
already
cleared
that
up.
K
I
know
that
again,
spatty's
coffee
created
a
facebook
event
saying
block
party
this
saturday
at
five
o'clock
on
ford
avenue
because
again-
and
it's
I'm
not
trying
to
be
funny
but
there's
a
lot
of
businesses
there
and
we
want
to
keep
things
going.
We
want
to
keep
you
know
money
flowing
in
because
their
rent
doesn't
stop
their
bills,
don't
stop.
Meanwhile,
they
have
to
endure
this
massive
construction
project.
K
I
appreciate
you
being
responsive,
councilwoman
hertek
has
talked
about
coming
back
in
a
few
weeks.
I
try
to
be
as
responsive
as
I
can
and
as
quickly
as
I
can,
as
has
councilwoman
hertek
to
the
different
neighborhood
associations.
The
media
is
asking
about
this.
I'm
going
to
call
a
reporter
back,
who
asked
for
a
quote
after
this.
They
can't
be
here
today,
but
they
want
to
know.
K
I
mean
this
is
pressing,
but
I
know
that
at
the
end
of
the
day,
once
the
project
is
complete,
that
we
will
be
grateful
and
thankful
that
this
was
done.
I
know
that
the
neighborhood
is
going
to
look
nicer
with
the
new
asphalt
and
everything
else
and
the
curbs
and
whatnot,
but
in
the
meantime
we
have
to
do
the
best
we
can
and
the
best
possible
to
be
respectful
of
the
people
that
live
there.
K
I
mean
what,
if
it
was
you
or
I
it
would
be,
it
would
be
misery
for
the
three-year
period
or,
however
long
it
takes
closing
florida
avenue,
which
is
so
busy,
as
we
all
know,
and
the
extension
now
to
september
23rd
is
a
major
inconvenience
people
think
okay,
it's
going
to
be
done
here
and
then
it's
you
know,
move
the
goal.
Post
move
the
goal
post,
while
the
businesses
and
the
residents
are
suffering
so
again.
Thank
you,
you're,
always
very
responsive.
You
have
a
great
team
with
you,
no
criticism
to
you.
K
Every
contractor
is
different.
You
know
when
it
was
kimmins
completely
different
story,
and
that
was
right
on
west
shore
very,
very
busy
area
with
nelson.
I
think
that,
especially
with
the
amount
of
tax
dollars
that
are
being
spent
on
this,
you
know
we
expect
better.
You
know
better
quality
of
service
and
respect
to
everybody
there.
Thank
you
very
much.
J
J
I
did
speak
to
miss
duncan
yesterday
about
reaching
out
to
fdot
and
seeing
what
has
happened,
how
they
are
able
to
manage
their
communication
honestly
so
well,
I
have
to
say
the
communication
between
the
the
difference
between
the
tone
of
the
of
this
meeting
with
the
southeast
seminole
heights.
Flood
relief
project,
with
both
neighborhood
associations,
old
seminole
heights
and
south
seminole
heights
versus
the
meeting.
The
fda
meeting
with
tampa
heights
was
just
night
and
day.
J
So
I
asked
her
to
reach
out
I'm
hoping
to
get
some
feedback
on
that
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks.
I
would
I
would
like
this.
I
would
like
this
to
come
back
in
two
weeks
the
week
before
you
have
this
hillsborough
high
meeting,
since
we
don't
have
an
actual
council
meeting
that
day,
so
that
we
can
get
an
update
on
this
before
going
into
that
meeting,
just
to
see
to
give
to
give
nelson
a
chance
to
get
started
with
this.
But
we
really.
J
We
really
want
to
hear
positive
things
about
litter
and
positive
things
about
the
trucks.
Again.
I
think
the
flagging
situation
is
one
as
a
great
idea,
but
we
will
be
reaching
out
both
councilman
maniscalco
and
I
are
direct
conduits,
so
we
will
be
reaching
out
if,
when
we
hear
of
other
concerns,
but
so
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
that
this
come
back
to
us
on
the
22nd.
How.
I
I
E
K
K
H
J
I
I
would
really
appreciate,
I
know
the
citizens
would
as
well.
I
don't
know
that
one
week
is
enough
time.
I
appreciate
your
answers,
but
I
don't
know
that
we've
been
able
to
see
drastic
change
in
this
time.
I
would
really
love
it
if
there
was
a
huge
litter
cleanup
between
now
and
then.
J
E
E
L
Just
one
one
quick
comment:
responding
to
council
member
hertek-
I
don't
know
who
was
doing
communication
before,
but
the
firm
he
just
mentioned
that
they've,
just
hired
is
one
of
the
best
in
the
region.
So
hopefully
you'll
see
a
change.
J
Thank
you,
oh
can,
can
you
send
this
presentation
to
me
and.
G
J
It
to
the
presidents
and.
J
K
E
A
Evening,
council
annie
barnes
development
coordination.
There
are
some
items
to
clean
up
for
you
tonight.
The
first
item
is
item
number
two,
which
is
also
related
to
item
number.
Five
item
number
two
is
tacpa
2209.
A
A
The
petition
was
not
properly
noticed
and
that
needs
to
be
removed
from
the
agenda.
Mr.
L
Chair
I'd
like
to
move
to
continue
file
number
tacpa
2209
to
september
22nd,
501.
D
D
It's
as
mr
chairman
mentioned.
It's
section,
27-150,
subsection
d
and
I'll.
Just
read
it
in
its
entirety.
For
you,
it
says
where
an
applicant
filing
an
application
for
rezoning
property
fails
to
perfect
his
application,
but
not
filing
the
affidavit
on
time
or
otherwise
fails
to
perfect
the
notice
or
site
plan
requirements
set
forth
in
this
chapter
so
that
the
petitioner
may
not
be
heard
at
the
scheduled
public
hearing
and
any
of
the
foregoing
acts
or
omissions
occur.
D
For
two
consecutive
public
hearings
scheduled
for
the
subject
petition
the
no
new
or
amended
application
involving
the
same
property
may
be
heard
for
a
minimum
period
of
six
months
from
the
date
of
the
last
public
hearing,
specifically
scheduled
for
that
petition
and
or
property.
So
what
this
means
and
this
you're
going
to
be
hearing
this
from
staff
moving
forward.
D
When
you
see
a
missed
notice
on
your
agenda
in
the
event
that
the
miss
notice
is
the
second
time
that
the
hearing
for
that
one
application
has
mis-noticed,
we
will
advise
counsel
that,
under
the
provisions
of
this
section,
the
application
should
be
withdrawn
from
the
agenda
under
this
section,
and
the
applicant
will
have
to
wait
six
months
to
file
a
new
application
in
order
to
move
forward.
So
with
regard
to
miss
notices,
staff
is
also
working
with
the
clerk's
office
and
applicants
to
advise
them
consistently
of
this
section
of
the
code.
D
You
know
their
actions
are
out
of
our
control,
but
we're
trying
to
let
applicants
know
if
the
consequences
of
of
two
two
missed
notices,
we're
also
offering
to
applicants.
Staff
has
been
if
they
would
like
to
show
us
the
affidavit
and
the
supporting
documentation
before
the
filing
deadline
with
the
clerk's
office.
To
the
extent
that
there's
an
error
that
can
be
corrected
by
the
deadline
and
avoidance
notice,
we
want
to
work
with
the
applicants
to
to
achieve
that.
L
As
well,
I
know
that
once
we
start
to
implement
this,
we
have
to
do
it
in
a
very
consistent
way
in
a
fair
way,
so
that
we
do
with
everybody
and
we
don't
make
exceptions
because
then
it
would
seem
like
it
was
arbitrary.
But
my
question
is
more
about
the
start
date.
L
I've
talked
to
you
about
this
subject
before,
but
I
didn't
know
that
we
were
going
to
implement
this
today.
I
I
don't
if
you
think
that
we've
given
sufficient
notice
of
this
particular
applicant
that
we
start
today,
we
could,
but
the
other
option
is,
is
to
make
a
statement
today
that,
as
of
the
first
october
meeting
or
something
like
that
september,
15th
that
we're
gonna
start
strictly
enforcing
this
well.
D
L
L
I
E
D
Well,
it's
not
until
recently
that
we've
had
the
issue
with
an
app
one.
The
same
application
was
noticing
more
than
once
so,
staff
has
been
monitoring
that.
L
D
D
Give
to
applicants
on
tonight's
agenda:
this
is
the
only
application
that
has
misnoticed
more
than
once,
and
I
know
mr
bricklemeyer
would
like
to
address
counsel.
He
feels
that
there
are
extenuating
circumstances
so
I'll.
Let
him
but.
L
E
H
L
D
It
if
I
may
just
it's
not
that
we're
starting
it.
This
has
been
on
the
books
that
has
been
implemented.
It's
not
until
we,
the
first
must
notice,
doesn't
trigger
any
repercussions
is
the
second.
So
this
is
why
you're
now,
starting
to
see
the
second
missed
notices
and
that's
what
we're
bringing
to
your
attention.
D
So
I
I.
I
don't
believe
that
there
has
to
be
a
delay
in
implementation
for
a
section
of
the
code,
that's
been
in
existence
and
applicants
and
their
consulting
team
should
be
aware
of
it.
But
again,
with
regard
to
item
number
five,
I
do
know
that
mr
bricklemeyer
would
like
to
address
counsel.
He
feels
there
are
extenuating
circumstances.
I
I
We
had
some
cases,
I
remember
and
remember
the
cases
where
there
were,
but
they
went
from
second
time.
You
got
to
wait
six
months
to
reapply
and
and
it's
not
a
hand,
slap
it's.
The
problem
is
you're,
holding
somebody's
back,
who
wants
to
get
on
and
now
you're
taking
his
or
her
spot,
and
that
shouldn't
be-
and
I
understand,
there's
circumstances
beyond
someone's
control.
I
I
understand
all
that,
but
I
I
what
I
want
to
make
sure
is
that
you're
not
getting
in
just
to
get
a
date
when
you're
not
prepared
to
show
the
whole
the
whole
plan
to
everyone
and
that's
what
it's
all
about,
but
it's
not
starting.
It
is
that
we
ended
it
somehow
and
we're
just
rekindling
it
to
catch
fire
again,
that's
what
it
is
bill.
E
If,
if
I
may,
mr
brooke,
I
know
you
want
to
speak
to
item
five
about
the
miss
notice.
Is
that
correct?
So
what
what
I
would
like
to
do
is
you're
asking
for
a
continuance
on
number
two.
Yes,
sir,
and
I'd
like
to
ask
if
there
is
anyone
in
chambers
that
wants
to
speak
to
that
continuance.
E
M
So
the
reason
there's
no
one
in
chambers,
mr
chairman,
is
that
we've
worked
extensively.
I
was
ready
to
go
on
hearing
to
hearing
on
this.
In
april
I
was
set
for
hearing
in
march.
M
The
planning
commission
came
back
and
told
us.
We
had
a
problem
on
april
the
7th
I
have
all
these
dates
burned
into
my
head,
because
I've
been
dealing
with
this
for
the
past
few
days.
Now
I
reached
out
and
asked
the
city
what
I
needed
to
do.
City
staff
told
me
what
I
needed
to
do.
Mr
maniscalco
got
a
letter
from
me
on
april
12th
asking
for
a
continuance
apparently,
and
I
have
been
practicing
here
for
a
while
I'll
blame
covet.
I
don't
know.
M
Apparently
the
system
that
you
have
in
place
is
I'm
set
on
march
28th
the
deadline.
That's
for
the
may
12th
hearing
the
deadline
to
notice
that
hearing
was
april.
The
12th
I
had
my
notice
ready
to
go.
I
was
instructed
by
staff
to
send
a
letter
if
we
are
trying
to
notice
the
public,
and
this
is
just
me
working
in
multiple
jurisdictions.
M
It
makes
no
sense
for
me
to
post
a
sign
and
send
a
letter
to
somebody
that
we're
going
to
have
a
hearing
on
may
12th
that
I
know
on
april
12th
we're
not
having
that's
misleading,
so
I
didn't
send
letters
and
I
didn't
send
a
sign
and
staff
didn't
tell
me
to
do
that
on
april
14th,
two
days
after
I
sent
a
letter
to
then
chairman
maniscalco,
I
got
an
email
from
ms
wells
telling
me
that
I
had
misnoticed
she
and
I
had
a
conversation.
I
said
I
did
not
miss
notice.
M
I
continued
she
told
me
not
under
our
code.
Fine,
I
said
I
I
there's
nothing.
I
can
do
about
it
now
right.
I
won't
send
your
confusing
misleading
notice.
That
would
have
helped
no
one
at
the
time
by
the
way,
the
planning
commission
when
they
came
to
us
on
the
7th
of
april
and
said
we
have
a
problem.
M
M
M
We
were
trying
to
hear
them.
In
august.
We
ended
up
at
september
the
8th
when
the
email
came
out,
the
email
from
staff
was
30
megabytes.
I
never
got
it.
It
was
too
big
staff
tells
me
they
did
not
get
an
email
bounce
back.
That
told
them
that
that
had
been
too
large.
I
had
checked
today
the
last
few
of
the
people
in
my
office
who
have
received
these
things
are
no
more
than
three
megs.
I
don't
know
why
I
got
a
30
meg.
I
don't
know
why
it
was
30
megs.
M
We
went
back
and
looked
where
it
was
quarantined
in
our
system
and
it
had
every
single
application
and
all
the
backup
attached
to
it,
which
is
why
it
was
30
megs.
I
never
got
any
indication
that
I
got
it,
I'm
being
told
that
staff
didn't
get
it.
I
will
tell
you,
I
had
my
wife,
send
me
a
30
meg
email
today
and
she
got
an
email
back.
That
said,
hey
this
didn't
go
through.
I've
talked
to
previous
staffs.
That
say
when
we
sent
out
those
emails
and
they
were
too
large,
we
would
get
some
indication.
M
I've
been
told
they
got
no
indication.
I
take
them
at
the
word.
I
like
everybody
over
to
my
left
and
that
I
work
with
I'm.
Not
I'm
not
I'm
not
excited
about
standing
here
and
telling
you
about
any
of
this,
but
to
be
told,
I'm
properly
noticed
for
september
22nd
to
be
heard.
I
was
properly
noticed
to
be
heard
tonight
on
the
comp
plan.
They've
told
me,
I
miss
noticed
because
I
didn't
get
the
notice
email
and
that's
the
way
the
city
works.
M
When
I
file
something
in
the
county,
if
I
file
by
may
whatever
I
know
that
my
hearing
is
november
whatever
I
know
my
notice
is
october
whatever
here
you
wait
for
an
email
city
staff
sends
you
an
email,
I've
got
an
item,
that's
supposed
to
be
heard
in
october.
I
have
not
had
that
email
yet
and
the
notice
deadline
is
9.
13.
Do
you
think,
especially
after
this
I'm
sending
two
emails
a
day
to
staff?
M
M
M
I
will
tell
you
I've
never
heard
of.
I
understand
it's
been
on
the
books.
I
get
it,
I'm
imagining
that,
and
mr
miranda
was
probably
here
when
they
created
that
rule.
My
guess
is
it
wasn't
intended
to
catch
me
in
this
situation.
It
wasn't
intended
to
be
put
in
to
get
people
who
did
the
best.
They
could
and
said,
I'm
the
one
by
the
way
for
tonight
I
wrote
I
said:
hey,
you
know
what
I
haven't
seen
my
package.
Where
is
the
package
setting
me
for
notice
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
it
was
like?
M
M
E
E
H
Hi,
my
name
is
carol
lanvin
lifelong
resident
of
tampa.
I
want
to
ask
you
to
please
please
grant
this
continuance.
This
group
has
actually
really
tried
very
hard
to
work
with
the
neighborhoods.
They
encountered
a
problem.
It
was.
It
was
a
last.
It
seemed
like
a
last
minute
thing.
They
were
told
they
were
going
to
have
to
change
their
site
plan
on
our
technicality.
I
won't
bore
you
with,
and
that
was
going
to.
F
Cost
the
loss.
H
F
H
I
don't
like
to
speak
to
other
people,
but
it's
my
understanding
that
all
the
neighborhood
organizations
in
the
area
support
them
because
of
the
extra
efforts
that
they
made
to
communicate
with
us
and
to
save
the
trees.
So
I'm
asking
you
to
please:
please
grant
them
the
continuance
and
let's
hear
both
of
these
on
the
22nd,
and
I
would
be
coming
in
person
to
speak
in
favor
of
these
on
the
22nd,
except
that
I'm
going
to
be
in
seattle.
H
So
I
will
be
writing
you
a
letter
supporting
both
of
these
these
items
for
this
this
group.
Thank
you.
Thank.
H
E
H
Okay,
I
have
noted
on
my
desk.
I
have
my
good
neighbor
notices,
and
this
has
taught
me
a
lesson.
I'm
gonna
write
the
postmark
date
on
this,
because
I
was
flabbergasted
today
that
that
it
said
miss
notice
on
there,
because
I
know
I've
had
this
notice
for
weeks
and
just
like
carol
ann
said,
these
folks
have
worked
really
hard
with
our
neighborhoods
to
get
us
a
project
that
was
worthy.
H
This
place
actually
looks
like
an
abandoned
horror
movie
and
they
want
to
put
something
nice
in
there
and
is
backing
up
to
something
that
looks
very
similar,
a
townhouse
project,
and
this
is
obviously
not
something
that
they
had
any
control
over
and
normally
I
am
all
for
people
who
are
acting
like
circus
clowns
and
not
doing
what
they're
supposed
to
do,
but
I
don't
think
that
these
folks
have
have
done
this
purposefully
in
any
way
shape
or
form.
H
I
To
find
out
exactly
what
happened,
we
hear
two
sides
they're
both
correct
but
they're,
saying
different
things.
So
I'd
like
to
find
out
where
the
problem
is
so
that
this
in
the
future
doesn't
happen.
That's
all
I
can
say
if
we
stop
this
process
everybody's
happy,
so
I
want
to
stop
the
process
of
this
and
that
and
who
did
who
didn't
and
the
ramble
stops.
In
other
words,
you
have
a
leaky
faucet
called
the
plumber.
N
Supporting
what
you're
saying
mr
miranda
and
also
you
know,
mr
brickwell
is
saying
that
the
county
has
a
different
way
of
doing
business
and
they've
got
different
way
of
doing
business.
If
it's
better
the.
Maybe
we
need
to
research
what
they're
doing
so
we
can
be
more
efficient
as
well,
so
we
bring
that
information
back
as
well.
H
Yes,
sir,
thank
you,
mr
chair,
aside
from
the
issues
that
miss
bennett
and
miss
poynter
talked
about
the
the
the
action
of
the
applicant,
I
mean
it
would
appear
to
me
that
you
know
the
the
the
purpose
of
this
rule,
which
which
I
I
support,
enforcing
with
notice,
whatever
you
want
to
call,
it
may
not
be
applicable
here
from
from
what
I
see
just
for
for
whatever
that
counts.
H
You
know
for
the
continuance,
but
because
I
don't
think
there
was
any
you
know
a
wasting
of
time,
etc,
etc.
From
from
what
I
see,
this
is
nothing
to
mind
you
against
staff.
Maybe
a
mistake
was
made.
Maybe
it
wasn't?
I
don't
know,
but
but
again
it
just
would
appear
that
it's
not
something
that's
applicable
to
this
particular
situation
and
and
whatnot.
K
E
Okay
and
and
councilman
carlson,
I
don't
know
if
you
need
to
do.
L
Just
miss
wells,
could
I
ask
you
a
question,
please
the
the
so
the
the
issue
of
large
files-
and
maybe
we
can
talk
more
about
this
on
the
20
second,
but
the
issue
of
large
it.
I've
never
used
a
cella,
but
is
there
a
place
in
a
cellar
where
all
this
is
posted
like
a
a
a
website
where
applicants
can
go
in
and
the
public
can
go
in
and
look
at
where
all
the
forms
are.
A
Yes,
annie
barnes
development
coordination,
so
what
he
was
referring
to
was
a
certified
application
and
they
were
all
in
a
cella
go
ahead.
L
My
my
question
to
miss
wells,
then,
is:
I
think
you
were
more
talking
about
number
five
than
number
two
correct.
That's
correct!
That's.
L
Considering,
whatever
we've
done
in
the
past,
we're
gonna
start
strictly
making
sure
we're
strictly
enforcing
this
rule.
If
we
ask
you
the
same
thing
for
number
five,
a
few
minutes
for
number
two:
if
we
continue
this,
are
we
setting
any
dangerous
precedent
or
or
is
the
fact
that
there
was
that
I
don't
know
what
what
reason
we
used
the
the
miscommunication
is,
that
a
is
that
an
okay
precedent
to
set,
or
how
would
you
define
this
certainly.
D
So,
with
regard
to
item
five,
technically,
it's
not
a
continuance
or
a
request
for
continuance
because
of
the
technical
notice.
It's
already
been
scheduled
for
september
22nd.
What
you
heard
from
mr
bricklemeyer
is
that
they've
sent
the
notice
out,
and
that
might
be
the
notice
that
stephanie
poyner
mentioned.
So
I
think
you
have
extenuating
circumstances
here
that
would
allow
council
to
not
consider
this
a
miss
notice
that
would
trigger
the
the
language
in
in
section
27-150,
for.
H
Malone
for
the
record,
kate
wells
just
stated
it,
but
just
so
we
are
crystal
clear,
jennifer
malone
with
the
planning
commission.
The
item
number
two.
The
plan
amendment
was
properly
noticed.
I
triple
checked
so
that
that
that
is
not
the
the
case
here.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you
and
the
the
commentaries
that
I
had
was
the
miss
notices
or
coming
in
without
being
ready
to
to
have
the
case
heard
whether
we
have
so
many
people
lined
up
behind
us
they're
saying
I
can't
get
hurt,
I
can't
get
her.
I
can't
get
my
properties
done
because
we
have
15
cases
a
night
and
like
tonight.
There
is
five
missed
notices.
E
E
F
E
E
A
Annie
barnes
development
coordination
so
just
to
confirm
item
number
five:
rec
2214.
Can
you
please
remove
it
from
the
agenda.
E
I
Know
want
to
make
things
clear.
I
just
want
to
make
a
motion.
Maybe
I
don't
want
to
wait
to
the
end
of
the
agenda
because
I
might
forget
behind
my,
but
what
I
like
to
see
is
whatever
mr
brickermeyer
said:
put
it
in
a
one-line
thing
and
let
the
city
answer
it.
What
they
did
see
where
we're
at.
I
don't
know,
I'm
not
blaming
anyone,
but
you
know
what
happened.
We
got
so
smart
with
computers
that
we
don't
speak
to
nobody.
Nobody
picks
up
the
phone
and
say
hey.
You
know
I
didn't
get
this.
G
I
E
A
Annie
barnes
item
number:
three
is
ab2
2213.
The
application
is
related
to
item
number
15
rez
2297.
A
A
Agenda
item
number
10
is
rez
2258.
If
the
petition
was
not
properly
noticed,
can
you
please
remove
from
the
agenda?
Second.
A
E
I
O
I'm
sorry
tyler,
hudson
foreign
north
ashley
drive,
we've
got
some
things
to
work
out
with
the
planning
commission
and
a
csx
use
restriction
from
a
vesting
deed
and
we'd
like
to
move
to
december,
if
possible.
Thank
you
and
we're
willing
to
waive
the
180-day
protection.
E
Seeing
none,
we
have
a
motion
made
by
councilman
miranda
seconded
by
councilman
mataskalka,
all
in
favor
all
right
any
opposed.
Thank
you.
Miss
barnes.
Does
that
clear.
Our
agenda
review
of
motion
for
opening
the
501
proceedings
question
made
by
councilman
miranda
seconded
by
councilman
goode,
it's
all
in
favor.
At
this
time,
mr
massey.
E
P
And
good
evening,
chairman
and
council
lashawn
dock
development,
coordination,
council,
item
number,
seven
and
item
eight
are
associated
so
item.
Seven
is
a
vacating,
vac,
2210
and
then
item
eight
is
a
rezoning
which
is
rec.
2242
we'd
like
to
ask
that
these
two
items
be
open
together.
If
we
could
and
then
have
them
voted
upon.
P
E
There
you
are,
thank
you,
sir.
Were
you.
H
H
H
H
Q
H
Looking
east
from
edison
avenue
and
cyprus
intersection
towards
north
boulevard-
and
this
is
the
southern
section
of
the
cypress
intersection
of
north
boulevard
to
be
vacated-
here's
another
view,
looking
east
at
cyprus
and
north
boulevard.
Again,
this
is
a
southern
section,
and
this
is
a
portion
of
the
road
that
is
proposed
to
be
vacated.
H
H
The
recommendation
is
staff
objects
of
this
vacant
request
based
on
response
receipt
from
storm
water
department,
easement
reservations,
overall
needed
for
frontier
mobility,
storm
water,
chico,
water
and
wastewater
natural
resource
resources,
comply
with
chapter
27
regarding
tree
preservation
and
site
design
for
any
improvements
placed
adjacent
to
trees
in
the
vacated
area.
That's
all
I
have
I'm
available.
If
you
have
any
questions
any.
P
Thank
you
again,
council
on
lashawn
doc,
development
coordination,
and
I
will
present
to
you
this
evening
the
rezoning
request
this
is
rec
2242.
The
applicant
is
ashley
glenn
land
holdings,
llc
they're
being
represented
by
katherine
coyle.
The
request
is
to
rezone
the
property
from
rm24
and
rs
50
to
pd
from
residential,
multi-family
and
commercial
uses
on
the
project.
I
would
like
to
take
a
second
before
I
turn
it
over
to
the
planning
commission
just
to
review
with
you
a
few
things
with
the
request.
So
one
what
is
before
you
is
a
pd
request.
P
The
site
planet
was
provided
for
you,
you'll
notice,
the
date
of
the
site
plan
on
the
staff
report.
The
site
plan
that's
provided
to.
You
has
already
incorporated
some
of
the
changes
requested
to
be
made
between
first
and
second
reading
on
that
plan.
But
what
you
have
before
you
is
a
pd
request
and
it
is,
it
shows
and
identifies
the
boundary
of
the
project
area.
So
you
don't
see
the
building
footprint
right
now.
At
this
phase
you
don't
see
the
parking
layout
or
the
curb
cuts.
P
What
is
provided
is
an
overall
boundary
for
the
project
and
then
entitlements
are
included
as
a
part
of
this
pd
package
as
a
part
of
the
approval
process,
the
applicant
as
they
come
in
for
phase
development
must
apply
for
incremental
site
plan
review.
At
the
time
of
review,
we
reviewed
the
incremental
plan,
which
would
then
include
that
detail.
You
would
normally
see
on
your
pd
site
plan.
P
So
in
cases
where
you
have
larger
developments
or
phase
development,
we
will
allow
or
you'll
see
it
come
in
as
incremental,
and
your
overall
approval
on
the
pd
site
plan
would
be
for
the
project
boundary
and
the
entitlements
within
so
each
time
an
incremental
is
submitted.
The
applicant
must
show
the
drawdowns
for
their
entitlements
and
that
I'm
sorry,
yes,
all
right.
P
Ross
has
provided
you
with
images
of
the
map
for
the
vacating
for
the
vacated
areas,
and
I
just
want
to
show
you
on
the
rezoning
map,
it's
easier
to
show
you,
the
parcels
included
in
this
rezoning
versus
giving
you
all
of
the
property
addresses
just
because
it
includes
a
couple
of
blocks
of
development.
So
this
is
the
property
under
this
request,
which
is
outlined
in
red,
so
the
northern
boundary
is
arch
and
then
you
can
see
this
is
north
boulevard,
the
eastern
boundary
of
the
project
area,
to
orient
you
on
this
map.
P
N
N
P
E
P
Absolutely
junior
b
lane
is
on
the
east
of
it,
and
the
boys
and
girls
club
building
is
on
the
east.
I
have
pictures
to
show
you
and
orient
you
with
the
site
when
I
do
my
presentation.
E
C
Commission,
as
lashawn
already
stated,
this
is
rec
2242,
I'm
just
presenting.
H
H
Some
of
you
may
recall
this
was
a
plan
amendment
actually
back
in
2016
to
have
the
this
future
land
use
on
this
property.
But
here's
an
ariel.
We
have
the
university
of
tampa
to
the
south
julian
b,
lane
to
the
east,
the
tampa
preparatory
academy
to
the
east
and
then
a
neighborhood
to
the
west
of
the
site,
and
then
this
is
the
proximity
to
the
river.
Does
put
it
in
that
coastal
hazard
area.
H
H
I
remember
it
very
well
because
it
was
one
of
my
first
fundaments
ever
so
when
I
started
here.
We
also
have
regional
mixed
use
100
across
the
street.
That's
the
preparatory
school
recreational
open
space
to
the
north,
that's
julian
b
lane
and
then
residential
20
is
the
neighborhood
to
the
west.
So
while
this
neighborhood
might
be
developed
as
primarily
single
family,
detached
there's
more
density
here,
there's
more
density
for.
H
Of
residential
20.
that
would,
if
that
allows
for
more
uses
than
might
be
existing
in
the
neighborhood
today,
the
planning
commission
did
find
this
consistent.
But,
as
lashon
stated
earlier,
we
reviewed
the
previous
site
plan
that
was
submitted
by
the
applicant.
This.
The
applicant
is
providing
mixed
use
through
a
note
on
the
site
plan
that
we
reviewed,
so
that
is
encouraged
by
the
comprehensive
plan.
H
We
also
found
the
notes
about
the
height
consistent,
some
commitments
that
the
that
the
applicant
is
making
to
the
height
of
the
site
and
stepping
back
from
the
neighborhood,
I'm
sure
lashawn
would
go
into
more
detail
with
that,
but
but
that
was
that
was
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
our
neighborhood
protection
policies.
So
that
concludes
my
presentation,
but
I
am
always
available
for.
E
Any
questions
for
ms
malone.
E
P
Thank
you
again,
counsel
the
sean
dock,
development
coordination
and
I
did
want
to
put
up
with
the
question
of
the
vacating.
I
would
like
to
show
the
areas
to
be
vacated.
P
P
Which
is
the
shaded
area
here,
and
these
are
the
areas
that
ross
has
defined.
E
You
have
questions,
no
okay!
If
that
that
same
picture
you
had
at
the
overhead,
can
you
you
lay
that
back
down?
Yes,
at
the
corner
of
north
boulevard
and
cyprus,
there's
a
pork
chop
on
the
south
side.
J
E
P
P
E
P
Council,
thank
you
again
and
I'll
go
ahead
and
go
over
the
project
details
for
the
rezoning,
which
again
is
the
rez
2242,
and
so
the
site
is
currently
developed,
as
councilman
has
already
mentioned,
that
it
is
developed
with
oakhurst
apartments,
and
this
site
contains
approximately
9.3
acres
and,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
the
site
plan
before
you
identifies
two
parcels
parcel
one
is
the
north
parcel
art
street
is
the
northern
boundary
north
boulevard
is
to
the
east.
P
P
The
surrounding
zoning
and
the
surrounding
uses-
this
is
the
property.
This
is
the
aerial
image
again.
The
property
on
the
project
area
is
outlined
in
red,
so
you
can
see
that
you
have
a
couple
of
pd's
that
are
located
along
north
boulevard.
You
have
commercial
general
zoning.
You've
got
your
residential
multi-family,
which
is
julian
b
lane
to
the
east,
the
boys
and
girls
club
to
the
east,
and
then
you
have
your
residential
single
family,
which
is
predominantly
to
the
west
of
the
site.
P
So
the
request
before
you,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
is
the
pd
to
allow
for
that
mixture
of
the
residential
and
the
commercial
mixed
uses.
What
has
been
included
in
the
staff
report
is
the
development
entitlement
chart
which
explains
the
maximum
development
allowed,
as
jennifer
has
explained,
the
future
land
use
for
this
project
area
is
umu
60
urban
mixed
use,
60.
it
allows
for
maximum
far
of
2.75.
P
This
request
also
has
an
associated
roadway
and
public
improvement
agreement
along
with
design
standards
within
the
site
plan
package,
and
this
site
is
also
located
in
the
west
tampa
overlay.
All
of
these
things
together
is
what
would
actually
determine
the
and
regulate
the
development
on
the
project,
and
I
have
pictures
of
the
site.
So
what
we're
going
to
do
is
start
on
the
eastern
boundary.
P
P
P
P
P
This
is
the
south
boundary
of
the
site.
This
is
cass.
Street
boulevard
is
to
the
right
in
this
picture
and
then
we'll
go
to
the
surrounding
uses,
starting
with
the
east
and
work
our
way
up
north.
So
this
is
the
east
of
the
site.
This
is
on
boulevard.
This
is
working
our
way,
north
east
of
the
site,
that's
the
boys
and
girls
club
building.
P
P
P
There
are
site
plan
modifications
required
to
be
made
between
first
and
second
reading.
A
revision
sheet
is
provided
in
the
staff
report,
but
I
have
a
revised
revision
sheet.
I'm
going
to
provide
to
you,
council
that
I
printed
out
so
in
the
reading
of
the
motion.
If
you
could
include
that
into
your
request
into
the
motion.
E
L
Could
you
just
reiterate
or
or
confirm
if
I'm
correct,
that
property,
I
don't
know
exactly
what
the
uses
are
these
property?
I
drive
all
the
time,
but
I
don't
know
what
whether
it's
low
rent
or
high
rent,
but
but
if,
whatever
it's
owned
now
the
can
you
just
confirm
that
we
don't
have
control
over
the
with
outside
of
the
zoning.
We
don't
have
control
of
the
exact
use
that
somebody
would
do
within
the
zoning
parameters
and
we
don't
have
any
control
of
what
kind
of
rent
they
might
charge.
D
So
the
request
for
this
application
is
residential,
multi-family
and
mixed-use
commercial,
so
the
multi-family
allows
different
types
of
structures,
and
if
approving
this,
you
would
be
approving
those
entitlements,
but
with
respect
to
the
rent
that
would
be
charged.
That
is
not
something
that
this
council
could
control
as
a
condition
of
approval
in
the
application
that
goes
beyond
and.
D
D
That
would
trigger
the
need
for
a
bonus
provision
agreement,
which
is
why
the
the
rent
charged
would
not
be
controlled
through
this.
L
Can
you
just
confirm
also
that
this
that
we
city
council
cannot
require
a
developer
to
have
rent
at
any
particular
any
affordable
housing
rent
level
without
offering
a
subsidy
of
some
kind?
Isn't
that
what
the
law
says.
A
L
D
R
Thank
you
for
hearing
the
application
tonight.
We
appreciate
your
time.
My
name
is
adam
harden
220,
west
7th
avenue
tampa
33602,
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
application
ashley
going
land
holding.
So
I'm
going
to
try
to
keep
it
brief
and
save
most
of
our
time
from
catherine
who,
unfortunately,
is
here
to
assist
us.
R
I
wanted
to
touch
on
a
thought
and
give
you
some
a
brief
overview
history
of
this
site,
but
so
the
statement
was
made
that
the
florida
ratio
that's
available
is
2.75
the
max,
but
it's
actually
3.25
we're
requesting
2.75
and
I'll
circle
back
to
that
thought.
With
regards
to
this
affordable
housing
discussion
in
a
minute,
so
the
oakhurst
property
is,
as
was
stated,
nine
and
a
half
acres
approximately.
That
is
the
majority
of
the
frontage
along
boulevard
north
of
the
university
of
tampa
and
up
to
the
interstate.
R
There
was
you
know,
the
city
of
tampa
urban
renewal
agency
took
control
of
the
property
from
the
river
to
the
back
side
of
oakhurst
turned
portion
of
it
into
a
public
park,
and
subsequently,
these
two
parcels,
along
with
a
third
parcel
where
wedu
the
tv
station
educational
tv
station,
resides
in
the
city
of
construction
service
building.
R
So
these
parcels
were
reconfigured
and
made
into
monolithic
parcels
which
essentially
blocked
the
neighborhood
off
to
the
back.
So
you
heard
a
little
bit
about
the
about
the
vacation,
so
there's
puts
and
takes
in
the
vacation.
R
The
are
the
the
south
parcel
with
the
additional
taking
from
boulevard
is
narrow
and
difficult
to
accomplish
vertically
integrated
mixed
use,
and
so
we've
proposed
to
close
boulevard.
We
believe
that
that
will
keep
southbound
boulevard
traffic
from
turning
right
and
then
immediately
attempting
to
turn
left
onto
that
section
of
edison.
R
The
north
block
is
deeper
and
we're
proposing
actually-
and
you
can
see-
I
don't
know
what
you
can
see-
the
green
section-
we're
dedicating
back
so
that
monroe,
which
is
the
street
behind
the
larger
northern
tract,
which
continues
all
the
way
up
to
the
commercial
parcel.
That's
controlled
by
wedu
will
be
opened
up
to
cyprus,
so
then
that
doesn't
create
that
tangle
turn
situation.
So
likewise,
there's
some
gaps
cores
in
the
plat.
If
you
will
that
keep
it
from
aligning
and
we're
dedicating
that
back.
R
R
So
in
this
case,
we've
worked
with
the
mobility
department
to
come
up
with
a
plan,
and
you
know
for
the
transformation
of
a
lane
on
boulevard
into
on-street
parking
for
the
creation
of
a
bike
track
extension
that
will
connect
to
the
completed
cass
bike
track,
and
our
portion
of
the
project,
of
course,
would
take
it
to
the
end
of
our
property,
but
the
with
the
thought
being
that
it
would
get
it
would
go
by
the
publix
and
in
at
main
street
and
then
over
the
boulevard
bridge.
R
The
boulevard
is
two
lanes
from
the
bridge
north.
It
was
traffic
calm
by
painting
the
center
of
the
bridge
out,
rather
than
leaving
the
additional
space
on
the
sides
for
bikes.
They
just
shoved
the
lanes
to
the
edge
of
the
bridge
and
painted
the
center
of
the
bridge
out,
and
then,
of
course,
we
know
once
we
get
to
the
university
of
tampa
that
that
it's
two
lanes
again
so
the
fdot
is
committed
to
not
dump
the
lexus
lanes
onto
boulevard
if
they're
ever
constructed,
and
so
with
that.
R
I
think
that
this
traffic
calming
project
will
be
appropriate.
So
I
know
that
you
know
we're
really
not
at
this
level
of
detail.
Yet
this
is
a
little
picture
of
how
we
see
the
scale
of
the
project.
This
would
be
standing
at
the
city
construction
service
center.
R
Looking
south,
you
know,
we
tried
to
pull
in
the
brick
elements
which
we
feel
like
are
give
identity
to
west
tampa
the.
R
So
the
pd
includes
a
provision
for
us
to
come
back
to
you
with
the
the
railway
improvement
agreement.
As
you
saw
from
lashawn's
pictures,
each
of
the
two
blocks
are
surrounded
by
above
ground
utilities.
R
We,
you
know,
would
think
it
would
we
you
know,
I
believe
that
the
city
should
look
at
expanding
the
the
monetary
provision
where
you
can
calculate
a
bonus
to
include
affordable
housing,
which
would
allow
developers
to
look
holistically
at
a
project
at
a
a
project
like
this.
To
not
only
do
the
needed,
you
know
public
improvements.
Obviously
we
can't
come
in
and
build
the
density
and
intensity
that
you
would
anticipate
for
your
your
western
gateway
if
it
is
to
downtown
tampa.
I
mean
these.
R
This
is
essentially
three
corners
at
two
lighted
intersections,
which
is
the
western
entrance
into
downtown.
You
know
I
served
four
years
on
the
transit
board
and
the
mpo.
R
You
know,
I
think,
if
we're
going
to
have
a
viable,
fast,
rapid
premium
connection
to
the
airport,
it's
sites-
and
so
you
know
here
are
the
two
corners
where
this
thing
makes
a
decision
of
how
it's
going
to
enter
downtown.
What
is
this
going
to
be
right?
Now?
We've
got
you
know,
253
year
old
apartments
on
wood
frame,
two-story
flat
roofs
which
have
you
know
gotten
to
the
end
of
their
useful
life.
R
So,
but
we
have,
you
know,
put
a
provision
in
the
pd
which
will
allow
us
to
come
back
to
you
with
the
roadway
improvement
agreement
and
a
proposal
to
do
some
workforce
housing.
Here
we
intend
to
do
that.
We
need
to
finalize
these
plans
with
cal's
group
and
get
bibs
and
put
some
some
some
meat
behind
us.
We
essentially
the
pd,
is
conditioned
to
allow
us
120
days
to
bring
that
agreement
back
to
you.
R
So
I
took
more
than
my
two
minutes:
I'm
gonna,
let
katherine
have
the
rest
of
the
time
and
now
I'll
be
here
to
answer
questions.
C
C
You've
seen
different
versions
of
this
from
everybody
north
would
be
this
way
as
opposed
to
normally,
which
would
be
up
just
to
reiterate
what
adam
said.
The
vacating
I
show
in
gray-
and
it's
the
gray
under
here,
which
is
edison
and
the
green
pieces,
are
what
we're
dedicating
back.
You
can
see
how
that
juts
out
here
and
how
it
actually
steps
in
and
the
roadways
actually
kind
of
jostles
along
on
the
north
and
south.
C
C
The
connections
here
in
the
green,
which
are
also
on
your
site
plan
just
in
gray.
Those
are
the
proposed
connections
through
the
parcel
those
cross
access
connections
so
that
you
can
get
from
the
back
in
an
area
through
to
north
boulevard
without
having
to
walk
all
the
way
around.
So
it'll
be
a
connection
either
through
the
buildings
under
the
buildings.
It
could
be
a
roadway,
it
could
be
a
pedestrian
pathway,
but
there's
two
on
this
block
and
one
on
this
block
just
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
context.
The.
C
This
blue
dash
line
is
the
cbd
periphery
and
for
your
reference,
you
don't
deal
much
with
the
cbd
periphery
anymore,
because
a
lot
of
it
is
built
out,
but
in
the
comp
plan
it
is
there
when
you're
within
that
boundary,
you
can
request
through
rezoning
and
a
bonus
for
100
of
your
density
and
intensity.
C
So
if
you're,
an
rmu
100
at
3.5,
you
can
actually
ask
for
up
to
seven.
Most
of
the
channel
district
was
actually
built
out
that
way.
This
is
a
slightly
different
perspective.
It's
zoomed
in
just
a
little
bit.
This
again
shows
you
the
periphery
boundary
where
you
can
get
that
that
bonus
up
to
100
downtown.
C
This
is
boulevard
and
I've
included
the
zoning
districts
and
you
can
see
op1
is
where
tampa
prep
is,
and
as
ms
malone
mentioned,
that's
where
the
rmu
100
is
on
the
comp
plan
on
the
future
land
use
map.
Op1
zoning
wise
by
right
is
200
feet
maximum
height.
So,
although
tampa
prep
doesn't
have
a
200
foot
building,
they
could
build
one
tomorrow
and
get
a
permit
for
it
without
having
to
rezone.
It
is
actually
under
the
zoning
category.
C
C
The
I
noted
also
the
dimension
here
just
to
give
you
the
proximity,
this
property,
although
it
is
not
in
downtown
and
technically
not
in
the
periphery,
it
is
on
this
edge.
It
is
less
than
a
quarter
of
a
mile
to
the
actual
land
of
downtown.
So
you
are
within
a
typical
transit
boundary,
a
walkable
boundary.
C
Mixture
of
uses
that
are
proposed,
ms
doc
mentioned
the
land
use
matrix
or
the
entitlement
chart
that
is
actually
on
the
plan.
It
does
call
for
it's
nine
point.
Approximately
nine
point.
Three,
nine
point:
four
acres:
it's
one
million
one
hundred
twenty
seven
thousand
two
hundred
sixty
four
square
feet
sounds
like
a
lot.
This
is
a
fairly
large
parcel
and,
as
mentioned
by
the
planning
commission
and
the
zoning
city
planning,
staff
2.75
is
the
actual
maximum,
far
without
being
bonus
under
the
comp
plan.
C
So
that
actually
equates
to
that
number.
We
have
our
trip
count
for
pm
peak,
which
was
done
through
our
traffic
study.
C
We
also
have
an
additional
note
that
we're
adding
that
puts
an
additional
cap
just
to
make
it
clear
because
there's
a
mixture
of
uses
in
this,
ranging
from
retail
hotel
resident,
multi-family
residential
and
office,
there's
an
outside
cap,
also
just
to
make
sure
that,
as
we
trade
things
off
as
the
market
changes,
if
we
need
to
do
a
little
bit
more
office,
a
little
more
residential
and
we
trade
those
things
off-
that
it'll
never
exceed
60
000
square
feet
of
retail,
100,
000
of
office
or
120
rooms
of
hotel,
and
that
is
typical
on
a
lot
of
these
types
of
rezonings,
where
you
have
such
a
large
sum
of
entitlements
that
there
is
an
outside
limit,
essentially
so
that
the
people
out
there
know
it's
not
going
to
just
turn
into
a
big
mall
or
just
a
big
office
complex.
C
C
C
C
So
you'll
see
on
the
boulevard
cross
section.
You
have
an
eight
plus
width
of
sidewalk
where
the
pedestrian
is
in
the
street
trees
and
then
the
build
two
lines
are
here.
So
this
is
a
similar
to
downtown
the
actual
downtown
code.
Where
you
have
a
public
realm,
you
have
a
build
two
line
for
the
building
and
then
that
space
in
between
the
build
two
line
and
the
private
or
the
private
property
line
is
also
part
of
that
public
realm.
C
So
what
you'll
wind
up
with
in
the
plan
view,
is
16
to
20
feet,
potentially
with
sidewalk
and
sidewalk
cafes
and
other
street
fronting
uses
from
those
buildings
that
that
will
be
built
on
the
boulevard
section
as
well.
There's
an
improved
bike
lane
on
the
west
side,
there's
one
on
the
east
side
now
and
then
also
the
introduction
of
on-street
parking,
which
would
then
complete
the
corridor
where
we
put
it
on.
We
formerly
with
the
city,
the
city
put
it
on
the
east
side
in
front
of
the
park.
C
Now
the
the
premise
behind
this
would
be
to
do
the
entire
side
on
the
west
in
front
of
these
two
blocks.
So
it
would
complete
that
that
street
section
again,
we
also
included
the
street
sections
and
the
plan
view
for
local
streets,
public
and
private,
with
introduced
street
trees,
on-street
parking
and
widened
sidewalks.
C
Also
part
of
the
plan
is
a
tree
inventory
from
our
consultant,
dark,
moss
and
just
to
give
you
perspective
and
just
to
reiterate
all
of
the
staff,
our
city
staff
actually
found
it
consistent
with
the
exception
of
transportation,
and
that
was
specifically
with
loading
rates
and
parking
rates
which
I'll
get
to
natural
resources
did
find
it
consistent
with
some
additional
note
changes.
We
did
work
very
closely
with
aaron
miss
mayor
on
which
trees
which
grand
trees
needed
to
be
saved.
C
There
are
a
lot
of
trees,
internal
to
the
property,
because
it's
laid
out
as
a
two-story
apartment,
complex
with
open
surface
parking.
So
a
lot
of
these
trees
were
planted
and
just
kind
of
grew
up
over
time
on
this
particular
document.
What
I've
done
for
just
ease
of
presentation,
anything
in
green
is
what
we're
actually
preserving
in
place.
C
Anything
marked
in
the
purple
color,
those
are
the
palm
trees.
What
we've
added
to
the
site
plan
is
the
note
that
we
will
be
transplanting
those
it's
a
similar
mechanism
that
was
actually
done
at
the
heights.
There
was
a
several
hundred
trees
that
were
actually
transplanted
because
they're
like
big
onions,
you
pick
them
up
and
you
move,
then
you
replant
them.
C
C
C
This
is
a
vertical
mixed
use,
including
multi-family
office,
retail
and
hotel
uses
policy.
1.1.7
continue
to
consider
development
of
strategically
located
mixed-use
areas
in
all
districts
to
accommodate
local
serving
commercial
employment,
entertainment,
entertainment
uses.
This
is
a
mixed-use
project
occurs.
It's
located
approximately
a
quarter
of
a
mile
outside
of
downtown,
which
is
where
the
growth
is
really
supposed
to
go
strategically
located
at
one
of
the
main,
actually
two
of
the
main
western
gateways,
the
one
main
western
gateway
being
cast
into
downtown
on
cass
street.
C
C
Providing
design,
neighborhood
streets,
centers
public
spaces,
enhance
safety,
discourage
crime
by
providing
street
fronting
uses,
putting
those
eyes
on
the
street
adequate
lighting
and
sight
lines.
We
have
done
this
by
having
those
reduced
setbacks
and
placing
those
buildings
up
along
that
street
frontage,
creating
that
street
wall
and
then
also
adding
in
those
pedestrian
connections
or
vehicle
connections.
So
you
can
get
from
the
back
to
the
front
with
those
three
added
connections
through
the
blocks
under
urban
mixed
use.
60.
The
category
description
specifically
is
high
intensity
development,
residential
professional
office
and
commercial
development.
C
Up
up
to
2.75
far
blocks
are
small
and
rectangular
building
heights
step
down
and
less
separated
by
a
roadway,
moderately
wide
side
rocks
street
trees,
public
seating
areas,
inviting
amenities,
we're
taking
off
all
the
boxes
and
all
of
the
parameters
that
we've
set
out
on
the
plan
parking
on
street
is
one
of
the
things.
That's
also
encouraged
urban
village
policies
to
land
use
policies.
5.1.2
5.1.3
also
speak
to
designing
mixed-use,
dense
commercial
mixed-use
projects
for
pedestrian
traffic.
C
Finally,
west
ham.
Cra
strategic
action
plan
also
speaks
very
clearly
to
streetscape
improvements,
attracting
commercial
support
services
to
the
growing
residential
population,
lane
width,
reductions,
widen
sidewalks
and
landscaping
that
serve
and
promote
business,
providing
additional
on-street
parking
and
under
the
land,
use
co,
zoning
and
code
sections
under
the
strategic
action
plan.
N
N
R
The
city
code
has
two
provisions
to
enter
into
a
bonus
agreement
to
move
the
florida
ratio
project
similar
to
this
say
in
urban
mixed
u60
from
the
base
far
to
the
to
the
maximum
far
so.
Those
categories
are
either
a
straight
10
person,
affordable
housing
or
entering
into
an
agreement
for
providing
capital
improvements
or
needed
improvements
that
connect
to
capital
improvements
that
are
on
the
cip
list,
and
so
I
kate
can
probably
give
you.
N
And-
and
I
ask
those
questions
you
know
because
of
the
development
in
the
area
which
you're
developing
and
I
wouldn't
be
a
good
counselor
in
a
district
five
specific
west
ham,
but
I
didn't
ask
those
kind
of
questions,
especially
that
I
know
what's
on
that
property
right
now,
yeah
sure.
So
that
was
my
concern
right
when
you
talked
about
percentages
and-
and
you
talked
about
housing-
okay,
that's
probably
that
pretty
pretty
that's
what
you're
planning
on
doing
with
your
mixed
use.
N
So
I'm
just
hoping
that
when
it
comes
down
the
road
we
we
look
at
some
other
incentives
that
the
city
may
have
to
provide
to
help
with
that
project.
If
it's
approved.
R
And
I'm
in
agreement
with
that
and
that's
why
we
conditioned
the
pd
to
allow
us
to
come
back
within
120
days
with
an
agreement
to
do
these
needed
improvements.
Again,
we
saw
photos
of
all
four
sides
of
two
blocks
which
have
wooden
power
poles
in
the
middle
of
the
sidewalk
and
and
these
issues
we've
got
the
unsafe
pedestrian
crossings,
which
are
the
main
connection
from
one
standpoint
of
the
park.
You
know
the
frogger
islands
and
but
additionally,
you
know
we
would
like
to
see
a
workforce
housing
component
here
as
well.
R
So
you
know
the
and
we
we
do
intend
to
come
back
and
and
try
to
negotiate
our
way
from
the
2.75
to
the
3.25
with
you
guys,
and
you
know,
for
providing
both
these
on-street
improvements
and
a
workforce
housing
component.
So.
N
R
N
E
J
I
have
a
question
about
from
about
transportation.
What
what
the
concerns
are.
K
Scott
planning,
we
just
have
objections
to
the
ask
for
a
parking
related
loading,
local
street
access,
our
typical
objections
so
from
play
for
that.
K
Easements
that
we're
placing
on
these
things-
and
they
have
to
come
back
within
120
days
and
have
plans
for.
J
J
But
so
those
are
the
objections.
Okay,
I
just
wanted
to
clarify.
Thank
you
and
then
I
have
more
transit
questions,
transportation,
questions
for
miss
coyle,
sorry
different.
If
you
can
put
a
picture
up
of
the
the
road
design
where
you
have
the
two
and
the
four
and
the
four
the
cars.
J
And
all
that
lovely
stuff.
First
of
all,
I
I
do
appreciate
the
idea
of
closing
that,
because
it
is
incredibly
dangerous
as
a
cyclist,
I
hate
doing
that
on
site
on
cypress.
Getting
rid
of
pork
chops
is
good
for
pedestrians
and
cyclists.
J
Parking
on
the
other
side,
it's
incredibly
dangerous,
and-
and
I
love
what
downtown
has
done
on
jackson,
cass
having
having
the
parking
on
the
outside
and
the
trucks.
R
The
final
plan
which
we
were
showing
and
it's
it's
much
such
a
small
scale.
Actually
the
cycle
track-
is
on
the
inside
and
we're
working
with
mobility
to
connect
that
from
the
roundabout
at
the
heights
and
to
the
cast
beat
cycle
track.
So
that
is
the
final
design.
That's
you
know
been.
You
know
that
it's
not.
J
I
I
would
appreciate
that
as
a
as
a
cyclist
as
someone
who's
always
focused
on
that
that
really
is
best
design
and
then
my
only
other
concern
that
I'm
hearing
from
residents
and
again
we'd
be
remiss
as
council
members,
especially
in
this
giant
housing
crisis.
If
we
didn't
talk
about-
and
I
know
this
has
nothing
to
do
with
rezoning,
but
I'm
going
to
ask
anyway
if
we
have
plans
for
the
people
who
are
currently
living
there,.
C
Well,
we
can
explain:
the
complex
is
covered
under
the
rules
for
hud,
so
they
do.
There
is
a
relocation.
C
R
To
meetings
notice,
you
know
assistance
with
relocation.
You
know
the
process
will
take
two
to
three
years.
J
R
Have
not
started
that
process
and
we've
been
steward.
You
know
really,
you
know
not.
We've
spent
every
money
plus
additional
capital
to
keep
the
place
going
and
we
don't
intend
to
you
know,
stop
we
acquired
it
in
2014
and
changed
lives
in
2016.
so
but
yeah
we
we
additionally
were.
You
know
we
hope
to
finalize
an
agreement
with
the
housing
authority
so
that
the
84
unit,
housing
assistance
program
agreement
gets
relocated
within
a
half
a
mile
or
so
the
project.
R
I
you
know
especially
you
know
you
take
armature
works
for
insurance
instance,
600
new
jobs.
R
You
know
it's
beneficial
for
everybody
if
everyone
can
live
near
the
place
where
they
work,
and
so
you
know
it's
it's
great
to
think
that
they'll
be
recreated,
but
I
don't
want
it
to
be
on
east
hillsborough
or
north
of
fowler
or
so,
and
you
know
we're
working
with
our
local
congress,
lady
and
the
hud
jacksonville
office,
to
make
that
you
know
transfer
to
the
housing
authority
so
that
those
units
can
be
recreated
in
west
river.
J
You
that's
I
I
appreciate
it.
Thank
you
guys.
I
I
That
court
of
force
almost
lived
there
and
I'm
talking
about
20
years
ago,
and
I
think
he
lived
in
new
york-
I'm
not
sure,
but
I
know
that
I
think
it
was
green,
I'm
not
sure
about
the
name,
but
I
remember
that
he
had
the
city
dancing
for
a
long
time
and
everything
come
to
a
good
end,
and
I
hope
that
everyone
that
lives
there
is
relocated
to
a
nice
place
unless
councilman
hurts
a
woman,
her
attack
said
we
have
a
crisis
and
the
crisis
is
taken
over
like
a
disease.
I
Everywhere
you
go
wherever
they
live,
it
becomes.
Somebody
sells
if
somebody
buys
and
the
ones
that
get
squeezed
out
are
the
ones
that
need
it,
the
most
and
we're
trying
to
find
some
locations
for
them
and
we're
working
on
it.
I
know
the
administration
is,
and
hopefully
we
can
come
to
some
resolution
in
the
near
future,
but
this
is
what's
on
the
books.
Now,
that's
what
we
have
to
go
by.
I
We
can't
go
and
supersede,
and
maybe
we
have
to
make
some
changes
to
our
code,
so
we
can
at
least
balance
out
the
the
situation,
the
playing
field,
and
I
like
the
project
when
you
get
the
approval
of
the
university
of
tampa.
I
That
means
you
don't
have
a
parking
problem,
because
they
were
really
really
tickled
about
parking
problems
and
it's
a
location
where
you
can
walk
downtown
if
you
work
downtown
in
whatever
capacity
medicine,
legal
clerk
whatever
and
it's
a
it's
a
location
that
is
suited
for
transportation
without
density,
you
will
have
no
transportation
and
that's
one
of
the
problems
that
we
also
have.
We
have
the
idea
of
transportation
and
moving
people
from
point
a
to
point
b,
but
the
density
is
not
quite
there.
So
therefore
we
have
lack
of
it.
E
F
Okay,
all
right,
charlie
delphine
jones,
1518,
west
lasalle
street,
vice
president
westwood
front
crown
launch
group
also
cac
member
west
tampa
cac.
F
Well,
of
course,
we
are
the
neighborhoods
that's
going
to
be
affected
by
the
project
you
all
know,
but
our
biggest
problem
is
that.
F
Is
when
mr
hardin
contacted
me
and
to
me
that's
kind
of
like
disrespectful,
and
on
top
of
that,
we're
like
to
have
the
opportunity
as
a
cac
board
for
him
to
come
in
front
of
the
cac
board.
F
This
is
an
old
complex.
I
think
it
was
built
in
1974.,
I'm
63.
I've
been
in
that
area.
All
my
life
we've
been
fighting
for
27
years.
20
years
I
haven't
had
any
peace
in
my
neighborhood
now.
The
problem
I
have
with
this
project
is
that
the
heif
now
the
picture
he
showed
you
guys.
Sorry,
so
you
all
don't
want
to
be
respect
disrespectful
about
the
hotel.
F
F
Of
course,
our
neighborhood
association
is
named
behind
that,
but
we
have
the
park
and
can
you
all
imagine
what
kind
of
traffic
and
overflow
that
comes
in
our
neighborhood?
When
I
say
we,
we
don't
have
any
peace.
So
that's
that's
one
of
the
problems.
F
Then
I
see
here
that
it
said
it's
supposed
to
be
7.5
acres
when
we
look
it
up
28
garden
apartments,
but
then
I
heard
someone
say:
9.5
acres,
okay.
So
what?
What
are
the
apartments
going
to
be
two
bedrooms?
Three
bedrooms,
one
bedroom,
how
many
cars?
Usually
if
you
have
apartments
at
least
two
cars
there.
We
all
have
problems
right
now
with
ut
students.
F
It
can't
be
three
minutes
already.
We
already
have
problems
with
ut
students
and
overflow.
At
this
point,
we
need
to
get
residential
permit
parking
because
we
can't
even
get
in
our
own
residence
when
there's
something
going
on.
So
what
are
they
going
to
do
about
the
impact
of
that?
F
He
said
something
about
workforce
housing
and
relocating
everything.
He
said
sound
good.
I
hope
he
holds
up
to
that
standards.
Then
he
says
tampa
housing
authority
where,
where
is
the
proof
back
to
the
hype
requirement?
The
tallest
building
in
the
cre
overlay
is
bethune
high
rise
and
that's
because
it
was
grandfathered
in
now
that
picture
he
just
he
showed.
I
can
tell
how
many
stories
it
was.
F
Thank
you,
okay,
so
is
it
gonna,
be
on-site
parking
or
anything
like
that?
He
said
something
about
affordability.
What
is
affordability
to
him?
A
thousand
dollars
a
month,
a
unit,
two
twenty
five
hundred
dollars,
and
so
far
as
the
land
use
and
addison
and
lemon
and
delaware,
and
all
of
that
that's
impacting
people
who
are
already
in
the
neighborhood.
F
And
then
what
kind
of
benefits
are
you
going
to
provide?
We
have
a
community
benefit,
the
rome
yard
agreement
has
he
looked
at
that,
so
I
think
he
needs
to
come
to
the
public
and
give
us
an
explanation
and
everything
he
said
here
come
and
tell
the
people,
especially
in
oakhurst.
That's
120
units
he's
proposing
at
least
88
more
units,
that's
not
even
additional
to
what's
on
that
site.
F
So
I
think
the
people
deserve
a
presentation
and
to
see
that
picture
that
he
put
up
with.
I
don't
know
how
many
stories
of
of
the
hotels
that's
going
to
be
there.
E
H
Hi,
my
name
is
caroline
bennett.
A
lifelong
resident
of
tampa
delphine
jones
contacted
me
and
was
very
concerned
about
the
fact.
There's
been
no
community
meetings
about
this
whatsoever
and
I
just
find
that
so
discouraging
the
gentleman
before
who
was
asking
for
the
continuance.
H
H
The
people
who
lived
there
did
not
get
a
notice
because
they
do
not
have
a
right
to
a
notice,
and
that
is
just
wrong
and
that
notice
should
include
a
phone
number
or
an
email
address
or
some
way
for
them
to
contact
their
neighborhood
association
or
contact
fan
and
ask
questions,
because
at
that
point
we
could
reach
out
to
the
developer
and
say
you've
got
to
give
these
people
a
community
meeting.
They
have
questions,
they
don't
understand.
What's
what's
going
to
happen?
They
have
input.
H
They
know
that
neighborhood
best
someone
lived
there
for
60
years.
They
could
probably
give
some
insight
that
might
make
the
project
better.
I
noticed
on
the
transportation,
there's
a
problem
with
the
maneuvering
requirements
I
haven't
heard
that
address.
I
really
don't
like
this
whole.
Well,
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
prove
it
today,
but
somewhere
down
the
line
and
we'll
start
talking
about
these
other
things.
H
I
I
don't
like
that
at
all.
If
they
meet
with
the
community
and
the
community
tells
them
and
talks
to
them
about
what
they
need
and
what
they
want,
the
project
will
be
better
and
even
if
they
can't
stay
there
or
they're
not
going
to
be
able
to
live
there
after
the
project
just
finished
at
least
we'll
have
a
chance
to
have
their
voices
heard.
At
least
they'll
have
a
chance
to
get
their
questions
answered.
I
think
this
should
be
continued
until
the
developer
can
meet
with
this
community
and
answer
their
questions.
H
About
the
number
of
trees,
they're,
removing
11
retention
of
type
1
trees,
all
the
other
trees,
the
52
percent
that
they're
retaining
those
are
all
palm
trees.
They're
plant
transplanting
palm
trees
are
just
big
pieces
of
grass
people.
They
don't
do
a
thing
so
11
retention
of
trees
and
all
those
grand
trees.
I
just
like
to
see
some
creativity
like
that
gentleman
who's
before
you
before
exhibited.
So
I
asked
you
to
postpone
this
and
ask
the
developer
to
meet
with
the
neighborhood.
Thank
you.
N
Evening,
council,
carlos
ramirez
2103
was
carmen
street.
I
was
just
warm.
N
Hats
in
the
community,
but
it
always
helps
when
some
of
the
organizations
that
I
have
along
with
alignment,
so
it
makes
my
job
a
little
bit
easier,
but
today
I'll
be
representing
the
north
high
park
alliance
and
the
north
high
park,
civic
association
and
neighborhood
watch.
N
I
already
sent
a
letter
on
behalf
of
the
west
tampa
cracac
saying
that
we
cannot
support
the
vacating
and
rezoning
because
there's
a
lack
of
detail
of
what's
going
to
be
developed
in
that
letter.
I
also
included
some
of
the
positive
attributes
of
this
filing,
as
well
as
some
of
the
concerns
that
we
have.
N
But
first
let
me
begin
by
saying
that
we
are
excited
about
redevelopment
in
this
area.
This
is
kind
of
what
we've
been
working
towards.
It
is
indeed
time
for
west
tampa
and
we
are
passionate
about
making
sure
that
we
do
things
right
by
our
community.
So,
let's
start
with
some
positives
things
that
we
like.
We
like
the
pedestrian
pathways
going
through
the
development
to
filter
the
community
to
the
park.
We
like
the
complete
street
typicals,
that's
going
to
provide
some
multiple
mobility
options
and
improve
lighting.
N
We
also
like
the
mixed
use,
and
we
also
even
like
the
density,
because
this
is
going
to
activate
this
area
and
the
area
in
front
of
julian
d
lane
park
concerns
that
we
do
have.
We
do
have
a
concern
regarding
the
height
we
were
asking
for
a
step
down
of
the
buildings
facing
residential.
The
current
pd
conditions
say
that
it
can
be
stepped
down
to
86
feet.
N
However,
that
is
eight
stories
high
by
right
and
while
they
may
do
less,
and
they
may
also
be
able
to
do
a
pedestrian
scale
screenscape
and
be
able
to
blend
with
the
neighborhood,
it's
not
guaranteed,
and
we
don't
have
any
details
on
that.
The
vacating
edison
we're
not
sure
exactly
how
this
is
going
to
impact
the
community,
because
we
don't
know
what's
going
to
happen
there,
we
don't
have
any
details
on
future
building
layouts
increased
traffic
volumes
that
may
come
from
the
development,
also
removing
the
right
turn
of
free
flow
lanes.
N
N
We
have
to
do
a
traffic
analysis
to
make
sure
that
any
projected
traffic
from
the
development
from
growth
in
the
area
and
other
developments
in
the
area
are
not
going
to
cause
an
unsafe
condition
with
backups,
but
I
have
I
have
not
seen
that
yet
the
displacement
of
the
residents
at
oakhurst
I've
had
conversations
with
mr
hardin
and
he
seems
to
understand
that
we
would
like
to
keep
our
community
intact,
and
he
has
mentioned
that.
He
is
working
with
leroy
moore
at
the
temple
housing
authority
towards
a
solution
which
is
great.
N
So
we
just
asked
that
you
continue
this
after
the
developer
has
met
with
the
west
tampa
infrastructure
subcommittee
on
the
20th
they're
already
on
the
agenda,
and
then
we
also
ask
that
you
include
a
pd
condition
where
the
community
gets
input
at
each
phase
of
this
or
just
go
with
the
traditional
result.
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank
you.
H
H
H
Approving
the
pd
at
this
time
gives
the
developer
card
block
to
build
what
he
wants.
I
spoke
to
mr
hardin
on
tuesday
and
he
stated
that
there
are
no
plans
for
community
outreach.
I
hear
now
that
he's
talking
about
some
bigger
plans,
but
what
they
need
is
direct
contact
with
this
community,
but
my
concern
lines
mainly
with
the
displacement
of
families
councilman
goodes.
Maybe
this
is
what
you
were
concerned
with
not
vacancy,
but
just
releasing
their
families.
All
of
you
should
be
concerned
with
this.
H
I
received
a
call
from
help
on
wednesday
morning
from
a
neighborhood
leader
with
close
ties
within
the
proposed
community,
that
is
to
be
leveled.
I
was
made
aware
of
the
placement
of
families.
I
reacted
as
a
human
being
and
not
as
a
developer
with
little
concern
for
human
frailty,
I'm
a
community
activist
and
will
help
any
neighborhood
in
tampa
does
not
matter
what
the
distance
is.
The
property
has
been
subsidized
housing
for
years.
If
you
approve
this
without
further
conversation,
you
would
be
approving
another
unaffordable
housing
complex,
but
of
all
my
all.
H
My
concern
is
200,
plus
people
that
reside
in
these
department
and
what
are
the
plans
for
relocation
in
speaking
to
some
of
the
residents
on
wednesday?
They
appear
to
be
confused
and
not
knowing
what
to
expect.
Could
this
possibly
be
if
this
goes
through?
Could
this
possibly
be
a
prospect
for
the
community
benefits
agreement
that
should
be
talked
about,
because
there
should
be
some
input
from
this
developer
if
it
is
approved
to
help
the
community
to
prove
this
now
is
like
putting
the
cart
before
the
horse
city
council.
H
Okay,
good
evening
this
is
the
most
prematurely
brought
before
council
pde
that
I've
ever
seen.
My
mouth
is
hanging
open,
approve
this
now
and
we'll
tell
you
what
we're
going
to
do
later,
approve
this
now
and
we'll
put
some
affordable
housing
in
it.
Approve
this
now
because
brant
peterson
says
it's
a
great
idea,
but
mr
ramirez
is
also
from
north
hyde
park,
so
who,
who
is
telling
the
story
correctly?
H
I
will
also
note
that
mr
peterson
is
a
commercial
real
estate
broker,
so
you
do
the
math
I
didn't
know
about
this
until
yesterday,
so
I
haven't
had
a
whole
lot
of
time
to
do
my
homework,
but
the
inconsistency
that
I've
heard
spoken
to
this
council
this
evening
just
made
me
want
to
fall
out
on
the
floor
because
I'm
having
the
vapors,
I
don't
know
how
you
could
possibly
even
consider
approving
a
project
that
doesn't
have
site
glands
that
doesn't
have
elevation
that
doesn't
take
into
consideration
that
there's
200
families
already
living
there.
H
H
I'm
sorry,
you
haven't
even
told
the
people
who
live
there,
that
you
plan
on
destroying
the
place
that
they
live.
They've
lived
most
of
their
lives
and
you're
gonna
it
just
befuddles
me
I
I'm
just
you
know
we
have
everybody
who's
sitting
on
that
council.
Right
now
knows
that
carol,
ann
and
I
have
dealt
with
many
huge
projects,
and
you
know
what
this
one
is
a
joke
and
I'm
not
playing,
and
I
don't
care
who
I
offend
because
seriously
y'all
cannot
approve
this
nonsense.
Well,
we
might
get
around
to
it
later.
H
H
E
C
Thank
you,
catherine
adam
will
speak
as
well.
I
do
want
to
enter
this
into
the
record
as
this
information
that
I
showed
earlier.
First
first
things.
First,
we
did
provide
notice
to
all
six
or
seven
associations
that
were
required
to
receive
notice
30
days
prior
and
since
that
time,
adam
has
reached
out
to
as
many
of
them
as
he
could
to
try
to
get
letters
and
discuss
the
project.
As
you
heard,
many
of
them
have
been
contacted.
C
I
had
a
very
nice
conversation
today
with
keller
mccaskill,
whose
mother
lives
at
oakhurst
and
she's,
a
secretary
of
than
very
nice
conversation,
and
she
made
the
decision
not
to
come
tonight.
She
had
another
meeting
to
go
to,
and
her
point
to
me
was
that
once
she
figured
out
what
was
actually
going
on
she's
like
well,
I
guess
I
don't
really
need
to
go.
C
It
was
a
very
lovely
conversation.
The
I
could
go
point
by
point
through
each
one
that
was
made
the
last
speaker.
R
I
have
one
point
that
I
think
I'd
like
to
make,
and
so
it's
very
disappointing
to
me
because
I
feel
like
this
fan
has
been
hijacked
and
isn't
representative
of
the
neighborhoods
and
you
you
guys
know
me
so
you
know
that
would
be.
Armature
works,
oxygen,
pfizer,
inland's,
insurance,
double
line,
bonds
and
those
are
the
things
that
we've
accomplished
at
the
heights.
You
know
20
million
dollar
public
project
extension
of
the
river
lock.
These
are
commits
commitments
we
made
to
you
and
things
that
we
follow
through
on.
R
So
the
idea
that
that
we
can
get
all
this
communication
sent
in
here
as
if
it's
representing
a
neighborhood
when
there
was
no
meeting
the
individual
members
of
all
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
did
not
go
to
a
fan,
meeting
and
vote
to
have
this
nonsense
sent
in
here
and
you
know,
personal
attacks
made
on
somebody-
who's
been
working
on
this
site
now
since
2014
this
is
you
know
it's
concerning
to
me.
I
don't
know
how
you
all
deal
with
it,
but
you
know
it's
like
the
same
four
people.
R
I've
been
here
like
four
or
five
times
recently,
and
I
hear
this
rant
and
it's
just
embarrassing
to
me
to
be
you
know,
for
the
city
in
all
honesty,
so
you
know
that
said,
you
know
judge
us
by
what
we
do.
You
know
it's
a
good
project,
the
you
know
you
can't
have
the
density
without
the
height.
R
You
know
the
urban
renewal
that
capped
off
the
you
know,
black
neighborhood,
behind
with
huge
monolithic,
commercial
blocks,
sold
them
to
the
schenbergs
in
the
70s
to
build,
affordable
housing
and
turned
the
portion
of
the
property
into
a
park
is
what
we're
trying
to
reverse.
So
we've
showed
you
a
plan.
R
We've
met
on
site,
I've
spent
four
or
five
hours
in
the
street
with
your
head
of
mobility
with
the
urban
planner.
We've
come
up
with
the
concept
to
put
these
cross
connections
back.
All
these
things
are
conditioned
in
the
zoning.
It's
exactly
what
we're
going
to
do.
We
know
exactly
what
the
walkable
streetscape's
going
to
look
like,
because
there's
two
pages
of
pictures
of
what
it's
going
to
look
like
in
the
plan.
So
you
know
this
comes
forward
as
a
million
250
square
foot
development
and
will
likely
be
constructed
in
four
phases.
R
You
know
the
city
code
is
in
hillsborough
county.
You
have
a
personal
appearance,
a
minor
modification,
a
major
modification
and
a
plan
development
zoning
in
the
city
of
tampa.
You
have
a
plan
development
setting,
and
so,
if
you
want
to
change
anything,
a
driveway
location,
anything
it's
a
planned
development
setting.
R
So
one
other
technical
matter
and-
and
I'm
done-
but
the
this
backing
issue
is
another
that
was
raised
by
one
of
the
folks
is
another
issue
which
is
a
standard
waiver
y'all
have
granted
for
the
last
16
or
something
pd's
in
the
in
the
urban
core.
You
know
you,
you
we're
concerned
with
cost,
and
you
know
the
biggest
thing
we
can
do
is
address
supply
and
demand
to
affect
costs.
Then
we
can
look
at
different
levels
of
subsidy
beyond
that.
R
But
you
know
the
urban
code
that
created
915
franklin
where
I
drive
up
florida
avenue
and
there's
just
a
blanked
out
wall
and
huge
transformer
grills
is
broken.
So
we
come
to
you
with
waivers
which
allow
us
to
make
it
a
walkable,
livable
community.
We
have
committed
in
advance
to
reconnect
the
neighborhood
behind
the
park
to
make
the
pedestrian
improvements
and
given
ourselves
120
days
to
come
back
to
you
with
a
community
benefits
agreement
and
those
are
all
written
conditions.
So,
mr
jim.
C
C
Yes,
we
still
have
a
few
seconds
left.
I
just
wanted
to
also
rebut
a
couple
of
comments.
Mr
ramirez
noted
that
there
was
no
trip,
information
or
transportation
information.
There
is
a
almost
200-page
traffic
study
that
was
done
as
part
as
required
to
go
along
with
this.
That's
where
that
matrix
came
from
for
equivalencies,
that's
just
a
standard
practice
through
by
your
code,
30
seconds.
Okay,
I
do
want
to
enter
this
into
the
record
as
just
just
to
reiterate
really
quickly.
C
We
are
asking
for
2.75
for
vertical
mixed
use,
which
is
what
is
allowed.
We
are
not
actually
seeking
bonus
at
this
time,
all
right,
so
we're
not
actually
asking
to
get
anything
more
than
what
the
comp
plan
actually
allows
and
to
say
that
you,
like
the
density
and
intensity
is
wonderful
and
mr
ramirez
said
that
he
likes
the
density
and
intensity.
The
only
way
to
get
that
is
with
the
additional
height,
because
the
blocks
are
small
and
they're
narrow
one
goes
with
the
other.
That's
all
I
have
to
say
thank
you.
K
Yes,
a
couple
comments
and
a
question:
you
know,
first
of
all
than
wasn't
hijacked
I
used
to
be
a
part
of
it
with
the
neighborhood
association
and
it
was
dying.
A
lot
of
people
have
passed
away
since
and
there
was
a
point
there
where
it
was
virtually
non-existent.
Now
it's
just
been
re-energized
and
revitalized
because
there's
so
much
going
on
in
the
city,
I
mean
we
went
through
10
years
ago,
the
great
recession,
and
that's
when
I
got
involved
in
that
era.
K
So
now
you
have
new
people
that
are
involved
in
it
and
they're
very
passionate
on
not
just
their
neighborhood,
but
everything
else.
So
this
is
why
we're
seeing
that.
But
my
question
is
several
people
have
mentioned
that
you
know
the
neighborhood
just
found
out
about
this
a
couple
days
ago,
they're
flabbergasted.
R
The
communications
have
been
going
on
with
carlos
for
two
months,
so
he
had
indicated
that
he
was
going
to
transmit
these
plans.
That
plans
were
in
fact
reviewed
at
the
cac
meeting.
You
know
the
you
know
that
I've
come
to
you
three
times
to
rezone
the
heights
with
three
written
letters
of
support
from
the
adjacent
neighborhoods.
R
I
even
reached
out
to
sandy
sanchez,
who
puts
her
name
in
to
receive
notice
for
projects
in
surrounding
neighborhoods,
but
armory
gardens
is
miles
from
our
project
and
because
I
hadn't
heard
from
her
and
gotten
any
questions,
I
found
her
phone
number
and
called
her
and
had
a
conversation
with
her
on
tuesday.
R
So
you
know
this
is
the
extent
to
which
I've
gone.
You
know
did
I
I
feel
like.
I
should
have
probably
pursued
it
when
I
couldn't
get
a
hold
of
miss
mcnair
and
I
was
trusting.
You
know
that
carlos
was
doing
this
communication
because
he
said
he
was
basically
getting
the
plans
from
me
distributing
them
to
to
the
west
river
crime
watch
association
and
then
taking
them
to
the
cac
meeting
that
he
chairs,
that
that
was
what
was
taking
place.
R
But
then,
when
I
spoke
with
delphine,
because
I
called
her
my
own
volition,
because
I
couldn't
get
through
to
ruth
and
then
I
was
you
know
immediately
found
out
that
she
felt
like
she
didn't
have
enough
information
that
the
meeting
that
they
had
to
discuss
it
wasn't
adequate.
I
hung
up
the
phone
called
jesus
and
asked
if
I
could
be
on
the
next
agenda.
E
N
Well,
mr
hardin,
yes,
sir,
you
got
a
little
frustrated
which
I
can
understand
you.
You
are
a
great
developer.
You
do
great
work
in
the
community.
Armature
works
in
the
temple
ice
area.
My
great-aunt,
who
raised
me,
lived
out
of
306
west
park
and
that
whole
community
just
transformed.
I
don't
recognize
it
anymore,
to
be
honest
with
you,
so
when
people
see
neighborhoods
change
when
they
saw
people
that
once
looked
like
them,
don't
see
them
anymore.
They
raise
questions.
N
There
are
about
three
different
associations
that
are
very,
very
active
in
there
and
and
to
me
I
don't
know
they.
They
always
communicate
and
get
back
with
people,
so
they
hear
that
they
didn't
get
back,
especially
mrs
mcnair,
who
lives
right
off
of
nassau.
I
just
I
don't
understand
that,
but
things
do
happen
through
the
cracks,
but
for
me
I
don't
think
the
communication
has
all
been
there.
N
I
just
I
mean
this
is
a
this
is
a
major
project
for
me
I
mean
I,
I
know
that
community
well,
I
know
that
development-
that's
on
there
right
now
well,
and
some
of
the
questions
that
some
of
the
folks
in
there
have
are
are
legitimate.
You
know
you
talk
about
families
that
live
there.
Now
you
talk
about.
This
is
a
different
type
of
project,
because
there's
no
way
some
of
those
families
that
are
there
are
going
to
be
living
there
when
if
the
project
is
built,
I
just
I
don't
see
that
now.
N
When
I
see
the
beautiful
picture
you
showed
up,
I
don't
see
those
folks
living
there.
I
just
don't
I'm
just
going
to
be
honest
with
you,
so
that's
probably
a
concern
of
the
other
neighborhood
of
who's
going
to
be
living
there
and
that's
a
valid
concern
of
them
of
theirs
a
conversation.
You
talk
about
a
community
benefits
agreement.
You
know
that
I
got
implemented
back
in
2019
2019
and
we
still
don't
have
the
cities
it's
coming
up
too.
So
there's
a
lot
of
the
questions
which
just
doesn't
affect
that
at
this
particular
time.
R
And
at
our
own
peril,
we've
committed
in
the
pd
to
a
portion
of
the
you
know
to
already
provide
the
cross
accesses
through
the
private
property,
to
reconnect
the
neighborhood
to
the
park
and
the
utility
improvements
and
stuff
that
are
required
for
the
development
so
and
given
ourselves
120
window
to
get
final
plans
and
bid
them
out
and
come
back
to
you
with
what
that
proposal
is.
So
you
know
understood.
L
L
I
think
you're
kind
of
a
policy
want
which
I
appreciate
the
I
also
know
that
they
and
people
really
well
and
what
my
colleague
said
is
is
true
that
and
the
last
administration
was
anti-neighborhoods
and
then
that
and
then
some
people
died
off
and
what
happened
is
that
this
new
group
came
together
and
they
were
really
active.
L
And
do
you
remember,
I
don't
know
if
you
ever
dealt
with
margaret
vici,
but
now
we've
got
like
eight
of
them
and
and
they
really
know
how
to
organize
and
what
what
what
easily
can
happen
is
they
know
how
to
pack
a
room.
L
So
I
would
encourage
you
if
this
passes
that
first
reading,
I
would
highly
encourage
you
to
fully
engage
in
whatever
time
you
have,
because
and
and
don't
underestimate
them,
because
they
they
they've
spent
two
or
three
years
now,
with
with
the
whole
legal
team
of
the
city
and
the
planning,
people
and
and
the
mayor
and
everyone
else,
they
know
how
to
come
in
armed
with
competent,
substantial
evidence
and
everything,
but
but
they
they
showed
as
examples
if
they,
if,
if
folks
work
with
them,
which
I
know
you
know
how
to
do,
then
then
they
can.
L
Then
they
can
easily
support
things.
So
I
I
would
just
encourage
you
to
work
with
them.
If
this
passed
that
first
reading
so
the
second
reading,
they
either
support
it
or
don't
show
up.
R
So
when
did
they
have
a
meeting
and
and
determined
that
they
should
send
their
executive
director
their
secretary,
their
vice
president
forward
to
oppose
this
project?
So
that
didn't
happen
and
that's
where
this
thing's
been
hijacked.
So
it's
not
right.
What's
going
on
here
and
I
I'm
just
pointing
it
out
so
yeah.
L
We've
had
no
clothes.
In
my
opinion,
we've
said:
we've
said
in
our
meetings
that
we
need
to
make
sure
that
people
identify
themselves
correctly,
like
that
was
his
name
grant
peterson
you,
you
identified
that
he
is,
I
think,
the
head
of
neighborhood
association,
but
he's
not
representing
them
tonight,
and
I
don't
remember
how.
R
L
Let
me
ask
if
I
could
real
fast.
Can
I
ask
ms
wells
a
question
and
then
and
then
maybe
you
can
respond?
Mr
harden,
there
was
a
comment
made
by
one
of
the
speakers
that,
since
this
is
a
pd,
there
was
not
this.
The
next
one
is
a
pd
there's,
not
sufficient,
renderings
or
or
plans
put
in
the
file.
Is
it
can
you
testify
that
that
they
have
or
haven't
put
sufficient
renderings
in
the
phone.
P
Yes,
councilman
carlson
lashonda
development
coordination,
so
this
is
a
pd
with
the
condition
to
provide
to
submit
for
approval
through
an
incremental
review
process.
So
for
this
pd
they
have
provided
the
necessary
site
plan
which
outlines
the
boundary
which
will
be
provided,
but
they've
included
some
design
guidelines
as
a
part
of
their
pd
package.
So.
L
P
At
the
final
approval,
what
would
happen
is,
as
these
phases
are
developed,
then
the
developer
submits
for
review,
and
that
is
through
incremental
review,
and
that
is
administrative.
R
R
So
you
know
I'm
sensitive
to
what
you're
saying
and
I'm
also
frustrated
in
feeling
like
I
got
sandbagged
by
you're
reaching
out
to
sandy
sanchez
and
that
some
misrepresentations
have
been
made
by
three
of
the
fan
representatives
today
in
their
testimony,
I
would
be
willing
to
agree
to
a
continuance
to
9
22
if
that's
amenable
to
y'all,
and
that
way
we
will
have
our
meeting,
which
I
s
scheduled
for
9
20
and
we'll
come
back
to
you.
If.
E
That
works
for
you.
May
I,
mr
chair,
hang
on
one
second,
please
councilman
vera
councilman
hertag,
yes,
sir,
that's
a
woman.
J
I
I
I
agree
with
my
colleagues
you're
known
for
the
great
work
and
design
you
do,
but
I
also
literally
just
came
from
being
a
fan
member
just
five
months
ago,
and
I
know
the
work
they
do
and
the
fact
that
they
will
go
a
fan
just
goes
and
backs
up
a
neighborhood,
that's
confused
that
concerned,
and
what
concerns
me
about
this
is
that
they're
saying
they
weren't
contacted
or
worked
with.
J
So
I
I
support
your
idea
to
come
back
on
september
22nd
after
having
had
more
communication
with
those
groups,
because
I
do
agree,
I
think
I
think,
with
with
the
work
you
have
done
in
the
past.
I
I
have
full
faith
that
the
groups
that
that,
when,
when
things
are
explained,
it'll
it'll
be
a
little
more
clear,
but
what's
hard
about
this,
that's
different
from
traditional
pds.
Is
that
we're
all
used
to
seeing
a
full
site
plan?
The
community
is
used
to
seeing
a
full
site
plan.
J
This
is
just
such
an
unusual
way
of
dealing
with
what
the
community
sees
as
it
is.
It's
a
small
but
long
project.
I
mean
it's
a
narrow
rather
but
long
speed.
Space
of
land-
this
is
a
bigger
project,
but
also
it
feels
the
two
areas
that
it
connects
that
it
that
it
divides
right
now
that
oh
curse
divides.
The
community
has
felt
divided
for
quite
some
time,
and-
and
I
hear
what
you're
saying
about
wanting
to
bring
the
connectivity
back,
and
I
think
the
community
will
embrace
that.
J
I
just
think
you
need
to
share
your
vision
a
bit
more
and
the
fact
that
this
will
be
our
only
bite
at
this,
and
we
won't
see
the
incremental
pd
will
will
help
alleviate
any
concerns
we
have
as
well.
So
I
think
september
22nd
is
a
is
a
wise
move.
I
I
appreciate
that.
P
Yes,
lashonda
development
coordination
council.
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
september
22nd,
in
addition
to
the
rezoning
cases
that
we
have
on
schedule,
which
are
ten
cases.
We
have
four
cpas
four
complaint
amendments
and
one
vacating.
Just
so
you're
aware
for
september,
22nd.
G
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
chair.
I
I
appreciate
all
the
dialogue.
H
Back
and
forth,
etc.
I
know
that
there's
a
a
lot
of
spirited
room,
etc.
I
think
you
know
the
the
the
speaker
that
that
I
want
to
point
to
especially
mr
ramirez
talked
a
lot
about
some
of
the
obvious
and
open
benefits
of
this
project,
and
I
and
I
think
it
would
be
a
terrible
mistake
to
so
to
speak
throughout
the
baby
with
the
bathwater.
H
So
I
think
it's
good
to
you
know,
have
some
community
engagement
etc,
because
you
know
mr
hardin's
to
say
his
reputation
is
open
and
obvious
in
tampa
is
is
a
heck
of
an
understatement,
but
but
I
understand
the
need
for
community
involvement
in
this
particular
one.
But
but
again
I
think
it's
important
to
make
sure
that
we
look
at
this
whole
picture,
because
this
is
a
a
big
project
that
we
don't
want
to.
Let
get
away
with
us
without
the
proper
scrutiny.
E
L
You,
sir,
just
one
other
quick
thing:
we
I
talked
about
the
the
the
neighborhoods
and
the
people
that
are
living
adjacent
to
this
or
in
the
in
the
neighborhood.
L
The
other
issue
that
was
brought
up
was
the
people
that
actually
are
living
in
the
in
the
facility
right
now
and
it's
the
it's
the
it's
the
same
same
or
similar
issue
that
another
project
down
the
street
had
a
year
or
two
ago,
and
and
it's
a
problem
that
that
that
you
face
we
face
and
that's
why
asmus
well
some
of
the
questions
in
the
beginning
city,
council,
for
private
property.
L
That's
that's
a
whole
different
issue
than
dealing
with
people
who
are
living
adjacent
to
it
and
I
think
maybe,
as
other
people
have
said,
please,
we
we've
got
housing
people
in
this
in
the
city
too,
but
I
I
would
just
ask
that
you
do
that
in
the
most
sensitive
way
possible
and
but
some
you
or
somebody
has
to
explain
to
everyone
the
reality
that
that's
the
city
doesn't
control
that
price.
L
It's
not
it's,
not
a
city,
affordable,
housing
project,
it's
not
a
housing
authority
project
and
it's
it's
very
different
than
north
boulevard
homes,
and
so
was
so.
I
would
just
ask
that
you
help
us
all
in
in
trying
to
communicate
that
effectively
with
with
the
residents,
but
also
with
the
public,
because
you've
you've
probably
seen
or
heard
the
the
the
hundreds
of
people
that
have
come
through
here
in
the
last
few
weeks
talking
about
affordable
housing.
Thank
you.
K
Thank
you
very
much.
You
know,
and
I'm
just
trying
to
to
look
after
everyone,
you,
the
residents,
stand
the
neighborhood
whatever
I
you
know.
I
don't
like
to
see
people
fighting
and
I
think
it's
a
wonderful
project
and
again
your
reputation
speaks
for
itself.
I
we
know
the
quality
of
the
work
that
you've
done
here
in
this
community.
K
K
Hopefully
everything
gets
answered
and
the
22nd
you
know
could
go
smoothly
and
and
that's
it,
but
at
least
the
people
feel
heard
whatever
he
said
she
said,
but
at
least
there's
a
communication
and
it's
just
a
matter
of
what
less
than
two
weeks
difference,
and
hopefully
everything
works
out.
So
if
there's
nothing
else,
mr
chairman,
I'd
like
to
move
to
continue
item
seven
and
eight
to
september
22nd,
if
we
could
put
it
first
on
the
agenda
after
the
tacpas
and
plan
amendments.
Before
we
go
into
the
alcoholic
beverage
sales,
let.
H
I
think
you
could
move
the
two
together.
Thank.
L
Mr,
mr
hardin,
do
you
you
want
us
to
continue
both
or
do
you
want
us
to
the
first?
One
is
a
vacation,
so
it's
not
as
different
than
the
pd.
You
want
us
to
continue,
but.
R
E
F
H
H
H
H
H
K
K
K
F
E
A
Good
evening,
council
annie
barnes
development
coordination
item
number
nine
is
rec
2250.
Q
Good
evening,
thomas
with
your
planning
commission
staff,
this
is
located
in
the
university
planning
district
and
on
the
north,
tampa
community
neighborhood,
the
closest
transit
stop
is
0.1
miles
to
the
north
of
the
subject
site
at
north
14th
street
and
east
lineball
avenue.
The
closest
recreational
facility
is
the
david
e
west
park
located
three-fourths
of
a
mile
to
the
east
of
the
site,
and
it
is
within
a
level
e
evacuation
zone.
E
Q
Q
Let's
move
on
okay,
so
here
is
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site.
The
surrounding
area
is
predominantly
single-family
detached
and
some
small
multi-family
units
they're
mainly
quad,
plexus
and
duplexes,
so
they
from
the
aerial.
It
all
looks
like
it's
single
family,
but
it's
more
of
the
two
small
like
duplexes
or
quad,
plexes
and
stuff,
like
that.
Q
To
the
future
land
use
map,
here's
the
adopted
future
land
use
the
subject
site
is
within
the
residential
20
future
land
use
designation.
That
designation
supports
lower
to
medium
density
uses.
As
you
can
see,
the
site
is
surrounded
by
the
r20
future
land
use.
Q
This
portion
of
east
98th
avenue
between
north
brooks
avenue
and
high
sien
avenue,
has
an
existing
average
density
of
8.8
units
per
acre.
The
subject
site
currently
has
a
developed
density
at
3.46
units
per
acre,
which
is
well
below
the
density
anticipated
under
the
our
20
future
land
use
future
land
use
designation
due
to
the
presence
of
the
rm18
zoning
districts
in
the
surrounding
area
planning.
Commission
staff
has
determined
that
the
pro's
proposed
rm18
zoning
district
is
comparable
compatible
with
the
development
pattern
and
this
portion
of
east
98th
avenue.
A
Annie
barnes
development
coordination.
Again
this
is
to
rezone
1402
east
98th
avenue
from
rs50
to
rm18.
The
subject
site
is
approximately
0.29
acres
in
size
and
located
northeast
of
the
intersection
of
98th
avenue
and
north
14th
street
property
directly
north
south,
east
and
west
of
the
subject.
Property
is
zoned
rs50,
however,
although
the
immediate
area
is
zoned
and
developed,
primarily
with
single-family
dwellings,
there
are
more
intense
residential
multi-family
zoning
in
the
general
area.
A
And
facing
east
99th
street
south
down
north
14th
street,
so
here's
a
area
or
a
street
view,
and
then
this
is
probably
directly
west
of
the
site,
so
it
is
zoned
residential
single
family,
but
obviously
developed
with
multi-family
uses
the
in
accordance
with
section
27
21.
The
proposed
rezoning
of
rm18
is
consistent
with
the
r20
future
lane
use
and
a
maximum
of
five
dwelling
units
would
be
allowed
and
on
the
subject
site,
if
all
other
land
development
regulations
are
met.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Any.
K
With
this
duplex,
are
you
going
to
live
in
one
and
rent,
the
other
kind
of
thing,
or
it's
just
your
own
separate
product,
it'll.
P
Just
be
for
investment
purposes,
currently
the
single
family
home,
that's
on
the
property
is
section
eight,
so.
E
E
J
I,
like
changing
things
up
file
number
rez,
22-50
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
1402
east
98th
avenue
in
the
city
of
tampa
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning
district
classification,
rs50
residential
single
family
to
rm18
residential
multifamily,
providing
an
effective
date.
Second,.
A
E
F
L
F
C
A
Good
evening,
andy
barnes
development,
coronation
file
or
item
number
11
is
file
number
rec
2260..
Q
Same
time
as
with
your
planning
commission
staff,
this
is
located
in
the
west
shore
planning
district
in
the
carver
city,
lincoln
gardens
neighborhood,
the
closest
transit
stop
is
directly
in
front
of
the
site
on
west
shore.
Boulevard
western
boulevard
is
also
a
transit
emphasis
corridor.
The
closest
recreational
facility
is
the
lincoln
garden
park
located
1.5
miles
to
the
northeast
of
the
site,
and
the
site
is
within
a
level
a
evacuation
zone.
Q
Here
is
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site.
The
surrounding
area
is
predominantly
low,
mid
and
high
rise
office
and
commercial
uses
to
the
east
of
the
site.
You
can
see
jefferson,
high
school
and
then
to
the
north
of
the
site.
Is
international
mall
south
of
the
site
is
west
shore
mall.
You
can
see
some
multi-family
development
up
here
along
west
spruce
street
that
exists
now.
Q
Here
is
a
map
of
the
future
land
use.
The
site
is
recognized
under
the
rmu
100
future
land
use
designation.
This
designation
is
the
has
the
highest
intensity
and
density
outside
the
central
business
district.
Q
You
can
see
the
rmu
100
extends
up
and
down
western
boulevard
all
the
way
up
to
boy
scout
on
boulevard
to
the
west
of
the
site.
This
light
grayish
white
color,
is
map
designation.
That's
a
municipal
airport
designation
for
the
airport.
The
light
blue
color
is
the
public
semi
public.
That's
tampa
international
airport
up
here
and
then
the
light
blue
color.
There
is
jefferson
high
school
and
then
you
can
see
some
of
that
low
density,
residential
10,
future
land
use
designation.
Q
That's
part
of
the
carver
city,
lincoln
gardens
neighborhood,
so
it's
kind
of
separate,
while
it's
in
that
neighborhood
jefferson,
high
school
kind
of
separates
them
from
each
other.
Q
The
proposed
pd
on
proposes,
or
the
pd
proposes
at
3.9
far,
which
is
just
below
the
maximum
intensity
of
a
3.5
bomb.
Far
anticipated
under
the
regional
mixed
use.
100,
designation
planning,
commission
staff
finds
that
the
pros,
use
and
intensity
are
consistent
with
the
urban
development
pattern
anticipated
in
this
area
of
the
city.
Q
The
proposal
zoning
supports
many
of
the
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plan
as
it
relates
to
housing
the
city's
population.
The
tampa
comprehensive
plan
encourages
new
housing
on
bacon
and
underutilized
land
to
ensure
an
adequate
supply
of
housing
is
available
to
meet
the
needs
of
tampa's
present
and
future
populations.
Q
In
conclusion,
the
proposed
development
is
consistent
with
the
development
pattern
anticipated
under
the
regional
mixed
use.
100
feature
land
use,
designation
and
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
area
and
development
pattern.
Furthermore,
the
request
is
consistent
with
the
compact
city
form
strategy,
which
seeks
to
promote
housing
densities
and
promote
walking
your
transit
and
employment
opportunities.
A
The
the
pd
is
seeking
two
approvals
for
or
buildings.
I'm
sorry
seeking
approval
for
two
buildings
identified
on
the
site
plan
as
tower
one
in
tower
two
tower.
One
is
proposed
for
165
residential
multi-family
units
with
a
approximately
6
000
square
foot,
restaurant
and
tower
2
is
proposed
for
195
units
proposed
maximum
height
is
164
feet,
14
stories
and
the
applicant
is
requesting
several
waivers
regarding
transportation
code
requirements.
A
A
So
this
is
the
subject
site
along
west
shore
boulevard
and
then
behind
facing
west
from
north
trask
street,
here's
a
picture
of
property
to
the
south
of
the
site
and
a
picture
of
some
of
the
subject
site.
This
is
directly
east
of
the
site,
a
school
and
then
again
another
angle
from
west
shore
boulevard.
A
Overall
development
review
and
client
staff
found
the
request,
inconsistent
based
on
transportation
and
development
coordination
findings.
Modifications
to
the
cycling
must
be
completed
by
the
applicant
between
first
and
second
reading
of
the
ordinance,
as
stated
on,
the
revision
sheet
is
approving
the
application.
That
concludes
my
presentation,
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
H
Since
that
time
they
fulfilled
their
promise
to
really
modernize
and
and
activate
that
area
and
improve
the
facades
consistent
with
the
west
shore
overlay
district
and
then
including,
the
opening
of
a
first
watch
standalone
restaurant
first
of
its
kind
in
the
west
shore
area.
It's
really
become
a
really
more
revitalized
area,
and
this
is
just
the
next
step
in
that
the
aaa
this
building
there
used
to
be
a
triple
a
building
on
this
site
triple
a
moved
to
the
north.
H
The
austin
center
is
just
one
block
one
parcel
south
of
here,
so
we
anticipate
that
there
will
be
a
lot
of
interplay
and
a
lot
of
people
living
in
these
units
that
will
be
walking
in
that
area.
And
that
brings
us
to
where
we
have
a
difference
of
opinion
on
with
your
staff
on
their
staff
report.
We
did,
as
you
heard,
have
a
finding
of
consistency
and
compatibility
with
the
comprehensive
plan
from
the
planning
commission,
and
we
have
been
found
consistent
with
site
plan
revisions
with
all
of
the
agencies.
H
With
the
exception
of
transportation,
we
are
removing
the
loading
birth.
There
was
just
a
mistake
in
the
plans
where
it
was
listed
as
12
by
57
instead
of
the
code
required
12
by
60
in
between
first
and
second
reading,
we'll
make
that
correction,
so
that
leaves
us
with
two
part
or
two
transportation
related
waivers.
We
are
asking
for
a
13.7
reduction
percent
reduction
and
we
are
asking
to
access
by
trask,
which
is
technically
a
local
street.
H
They
we
feel
that
is
all
our
entire
team
is
of
the
opinion
that
these
waivers
are
justified
based
on
the
location
and
based
on
the
characteristics
of
the
property
and
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
But
I
do
have
with
me,
randy
cohen,
who
is
both
a
transportation,
expert
and
expert
on
all
things:
west
shore
alliance
and
west
shore,
to
ask
we'd
like
to
ask
him
to
come
up
and
address
those.
B
Good
evening,
randy
cohen,
4121,
west
cypress
street-
and
I
have
been
sworn
talk
about
two
waivers.
The
first
waiver
is
a
waiver
for
a
connection
of
a
driveway
to
a
local
street
city
of
tampa
has
designated
trash
street
as
a
local
street.
There
are
10
commercial
driveways.
Currently,
these
are
the
orange
dots
that
are
commercial
driveway
connections
to
a
local
street.
B
Ironically,
trask
will
fairly
shortly
become
a
collector
rather
than
a
local
street,
because
it
will
have
an
interchange
with
I-275
under
the
dots
improvements
that
are
now
funded
moving
underway
and
as
a
matter
of
fact,
they
are
asking
for
proposals
from
contractors
for
design
builds
starting
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks.
So
massive
changes
here
even
more
ironic,
this
one
yellow
dot
here
with
the
black
dot
in
it,
is
an
existing
driveway
that
service
aaa's
site
for
over
40
years.
B
B
So
I
won't
spend
any
more
time
talking
about
that.
I
think
we've
adequately
justified
it.
We
have
a
parking
waiver,
we're
requesting
13.4
percent,
as
cami
told
you
already.
Let's
talk
just
a
little
bit
about
multi-family
and
what's
happening
with
parking,
we
have
to
talk
about
it
in
terms
of
parking
ratios,
because
that's
how
the
industry
discusses
it.
B
So
I
started
out
reviewing
a
number
of
national
publications
finding
out
what
is
common
and
consistent
with
parking
and
parking
ratios
across
the
country,
starting
with
real
estate
journal
mid-rise
parking
ratio
of
about
1.31
high
rise
about
1.1,
we're
kind
of
in
between,
depending
upon
how
you
define
a
building
high-rise
versus
mid-rise.
Let's
call
this
project
mid-rise,
make
sure
we're
comfortable
housing
wire
publication
overall
across
the
united
states
for
all
types
of
multi-family
1.46
is
the
parking
ratio?
B
It's
the
lowest
parking
ratio
since
1960,
it's
actually
showing
us
how
parking
is
changing
because
vehicle
ownership
is
changing
what
people
are
doing
when
they
live
in
multi-family
projects?
Do
they
work
proximate
to
they
drive
to
work?
B
Next,
one
is
the
national
apartment
association,
mid-rise
1.27
high
rise
0.93?
Next
one
is
a
national
apartment,
blog
suburban
1.25
urban
1.1
for
parking
ratios.
Why
am
I
talking
about,
although
these
are
all
national
things?
I
want
to
give
you
an
idea
of
the
trend
and,
what's
going
on
with
parking
now,
let's
speak
very
specifically.
B
Last
year,
altus
apartments,
which
are
the
new
apartment
building
across
the
street,
from
nissan
plus,
asked
me
to
do
a
parking
accumulation
study.
It
was
a
part
of
their
rezoning.
We
did
that
study.
We
actually
set
up
the
methodology
with
the
city
of
tampa
transportation.
Folks,
we
did
14
days
worth
of
counts.
I
believe
283
hours
of
parking
counts
in
that
particular
facility,
the
city
reviewed
it
approved
it,
parking
ratio,
1.39,
similar
size
project,
similar
size,
market
area,
etc.
So
you
couldn't
ask
for
a
better
identical
project
to
actually
do
actual
accounts
on.
B
Well,
first,
under
code,
the
parking
ratio
for
this
project
would
be
1.71
about
30
percent
higher
than
what
you
have
across
the
nation
and
what
you
have
with
the
altus
project,
which
is
literally
right
across
the
way
from
here
and
identical
building,
are
virtually
identical,
we're
proposing
a
13.4
percent
reduction,
which
would
be
a
parking
ratio
of
1.44,
pretty
conservative
on
the
high
side.
When
you
look
at
national
trends,
pretty
conservative
when
you
look
at
what
the
altus
has
is
a
parking
ratio
of
1.39.
B
H
A
Annie
barnes
development
coordination.
I
just
want
to
add
really
quick
if
approving
the
application
with
the
revision
sheet.
Just
for
the
record,
could
you
please
state
that
that
one
waiver
regarding
the
loading
space
will
be
struck.
E
E
E
Motion
made
by
councilman
good
seconded
by
councilman
miranda
any
further
discussion.
E
F
Q
Same
thomas
with
your
planning
commission
staff,
this
is
located
in
the
central
tampa
planning
district,
the
hyde
park,
urban
village,
the
hyde
park,
local
historic
district
and
the
hyde
park.
Spanish
town,
creek
neighborhood,
the
closest
transit
stop,
is
50
feet
south
of
the
subject
site.
The
closest
recreational
facility
is
aids.
Memorial
park
located
approximately
a
thousand
feet
to
the
northeast
of
the
site,
and
it
is
within
a
level
b.
Evacuation
zone.
Q
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
the
surrounding
area
is
a
mix
of
office,
commercial
and
multi-family
uses
just
the
south
of
the
site.
Is
you
can
kind
of
get
a
glimpse
of
davis
islands
and
tampa
general
hospital?
You
have
a
large
multi-family
development
here.
The
commercial
is
mainly
clustered
along
west
platte
street.
Q
Then
you
have
some
multi-family
over
here
on
the
other
side
of
south
hyde
park,
avenue
large
multi-family
development
here
and
then
along
west
beach
place
where
it
looks
like
there's
three
single-family
homes
here,
two
of
those
have
actually
been
converted
into
a
multi-family
development
such
as
the
one
that
is
on
being
proposed
right
now.
Q
So
I
am,
there
is
only,
I
believe,
one
multi
one
single
family
home
in
the
general
area
of
this
project
here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
As
you
can
see,
there's
quite
a
collection
of
adopted
future
land
uses
around
here.
You
can
see
the
site
kind
of
small
right
there.
It
is
recognized
under
the
residential
50
on
future
land
use
designation,
which
is
a
designation
intended
for
medium
to
high
density
residential
uses.
Q
As
you
can
see,
this
dark
reddish
color
kind
of
surrounds
the
area
and
makes
up
the
predominant
land
use
around
it
to
the
south
of
it.
You
have
an
even
higher
land
use
category
the
r83,
then
this
light
purple-ish
pink
color
is
a
cmu
35
and
then
farther
to
the
north.
You
have
the
regional
mixed
use,
100,
designation
and
then
along
bayer
boulevard.
Q
You
see
the
light
green,
representing
the
recreational
open
space,
future
land
use,
designation,
the
portion
of
west
beach
place
between
south
plant
avenue
and
bay
shore
boulevard,
excluding
the
subject
site,
has
an
existing
density
of
47.5
units
per
acre.
Q
The
request
proposes
five
multi-family
dwelling
units
residential
units
at
a
density
of
3.35.7
units
per
acre,
which
is
below
the
density
anticipated
under
the
residential
50
future
land
use
designation.
The
tampa
comprehensive
plan
encourages
multi-family
developments
to
include
the
orientation
to
the
front
door
of
the
neighborhood
sidewalk.
The
project
has
the
front
door
facing
south
plant
avenue
and
a
connection
connecting
path
to
it,
so
it
is
consistent
with
that
policy
direction.
Q
Additionally,
the
comprehensive
plan
supports
the
proposed
adaptive
reuse
of
the
existing
contributing
historic
structure.
The
adaptive
reuse
is
sensitive
and
respectful
to
the
neighborhood
character.
In
conclusion,
the
request
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
development
pattern
in
this
portion
of
hyde
park,
spanish
town
creek
neighborhood
and
is
consistent
with
the
long
range
development
pattern
incursion
under
the
residential
50
future
land
use
designation.
That
concludes
my
presentation,
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Any
questions.
A
A
The
arc
did
recommend
approval
of
the
site
plan
associated
with
this
request,
and
it
is
consistent
with
the
future
land
use
of
our
50.
overall
development
review.
Compliance
staff
did
find
it
inconsistent
based
on
transportation,
related
waivers.
However,
development
coordination
did
find
the
request
consistent.
So
let
me
show
you
some
pictures.
A
S
Giving
counsel
for
the
record
kevin
really
at
four
one
east
jackson
street,
with
sternsby
weber,
miller
law,
firm
here
representing
the
applicant,
I'm
going
to
jump
right
into
the
request
here
and
as
staff
stated,
this
is
an
adaptive
reuse.
This
is
a
unique
scenario
where
the
if
the
building
was
to
be
raised
and
we're
not
suggesting
that,
but
this
is
allowed
by
right.
The
only
reason
that
this
can't
be
done
by
right
under
the
code
is
because
we
can't
shift
the
access
to
plant
without
destroying
the
historic
structure.
S
And
so,
if
you
look
at
the
the
staff
report,
I
think
the
thing
that
jumps
out
the
most
is
that
there's
a
bunch
of
waivers
that
are
required.
All
of
those
waivers
can
be
tied
to
us
working
with
staff
to
try
and
save
the
sort,
historic
structure
and
develop
the
site
so
that
it
can
work
with
that,
and
so
the
the
challenge
here,
the
the
rezone
from
r01
to
pd,
the
rezoning
is,
is
basically
just
a
change
of
use.
S
Approval
on
steroids
because
of
combining
the
the
details
of
the
code
with
the
the
desire
to
maintain
this
resource
structure.
So
again
the
current
uses
office,
the
proposed
use,
is
multi-family.
It's
located
in
a
mixed
use
area.
It
would
be
prevented
by
right
with
redevelopment,
but
without
the
ability
to
adjust
that
access
we're
here
before
you
for
this
depth
of
reuse,
the
site
plan
changes
are
limited
to
improving
the
parking
screening,
the
solid
waste
and
adding
an
entry
with
which
the
arc
approved
unanimously.
S
When
we
went
before
them,
so
staff
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
surrounding
area.
I
I
did
a
little
visual
here.
It's
actually
even
more
limiting
than
what
the
uses
on
the
property
appraiser
website
show,
because
if
you
look
at
some
of
these
structures,
it'll
list
it
as
single
family.
When
you
go
to
it,
they
have
multiple
mailboxes
and
multiple
numbers
on
the
front
porch.
So
this
use
is
ubiquitous
in
the
area.
S
The
the
red
uses
here
are
all
commercial,
almost
all
office,
and
then
you
see
all
the
blue
uses
of
different
shades,
and
so
the
subject
type
here
outlined
in
green.
That
shows
up
well
on
my
paper,
but
not
on
your
elmo
and
I've
shown
it
in
blue.
So
you
can
see
what
it
looked
like
if
this
request
was
approved.
S
S
S
So
if
you
look
just
south
of
the
site
across
beach
place,
you
have
five
structures
that
are
shown
here,
two
of
our
office,
one
single
family,
two
multi-family.
But
if
you
look,
they
all
look
pretty
similar
right,
and
so,
when
you
talk
about
compatibility,
the
uses
are
compatible
and
the
the
structures
themselves
are
compatible.
S
This
here
is
one
of
the
offices
this
one
here
behind
the
tree
is
another
office.
The
blue
one
is
your
one
single
family
detached
and
then
these
two,
the
exact
same
use
that
we're
proposing
here,
which
is
basically
a
historic
structure
used
for
multi-family,
and
the
same
is
true.
If
you
start
expanding
the
area.
This
is
the
actual
block
that
the
subject
property
is
on.
Here's
the
subject
property
it
is,
it
is
the
one
in
most
need
of
repair
on
the
block.
S
So
this
this
request
would
allow
that
property
to
be
reinvested
in
and
improved,
and
you
can
see
one
two:
three
structures
that
are
historic
structures:
multiple
family,
less
than
10
units.
Exactly
what
we're
requesting
here
and
then
larger
multi-family
fluid
to
the
east
on
the
block
to
the
north.
So
now
we're
at
south
hyde
park
place,
you
have
a
duplex
exact
same
uses
for
three
of
the
structures
and
then
larger
multi-family
and
then
on
plant.
You
have
office
uses
which
vary
from
more
modern
buildings
to
repurposed
historic
structures
for
office
uses.
S
S
The
biggest
challenge
here
is
parking,
and
so
we
had
our
engineer
meet
with
your
staff
and
come
out
come
together
with
the
best
we
can
do
with
what's
there
and
then,
after
that,
we
met
with
the
rest
of
the
staff,
historic
preservation,
natural
resources
and
development
coordination
and
tried
to
figure
out
ways
to
minimize
those
waivers,
and
so
the
site
plan
has
undergone
significant
updates
to
handle
that
the-
and
you
know
I'll,
show
those
on
the
other
side
other
page,
but
the
entryway
here
you
can
see,
comes
to
the
back.
S
S
Additionally,
it'll
include
a
paved
ada
space,
the
back
out,
which
is
a
waiver,
but
that's
requested
by
natural
resources.
Staff
is
to
protect
this.
This
massive
grand
tree
here,
that's
across
the
alleyway
and
then
historic
preservation
staff
asked
for
screening
with
climbing
vegetation
and
impervious
pavers
to
make
it
more
compatible
with
historic
nature
of
the
area.
S
S
S
The
waivers
themselves
are
mitigated
by
one,
the
close
proximity
to
the
central
business
district,
they're,
created
by
the
sorry,
adding
a
bicycle
rack
and
the
fact
that
some
of
the
waivers
are
to
preserve
the
grand
tree
and
to
satisfy
historic
preservation
to
make
the
the
site
more
visually
compatible.
I
think
the
most
notable
one
is
the
parking
reduction.
S
The
the
waiver
request
of
a
44
reduction
is
four
spaces.
That's
because
these
units
are
actually
relatively
big,
even
though
it's
a
single
structure
and
so
the
way
your
your
parking
code
is
it's
a
suburban,
related
parking
requirement,
and
so
those
parking
numbers
go
up
quite
a
bit,
but
because
this
is
an
old
building.
If
we
weren't
before
you
all,
we
could
get
this
done.
Administratively.
S
The
code
allows
reductions
of
the
15
or
15
spaces,
whichever
is
greater,
and
so
we
are
providing
five
parking
spaces
to
the
to
the
nine
that
are
required
for
space
reduction.
We
could
do
this
administratively
again
and
not
to
beat
the
dead
horse,
but
it's
really
you
all
approving
an
adaptive
reuse
that
we
could
otherwise
work
through
administratively.
S
The
other
waivers
are
to
buffer
in
green
space,
the
green
space
waiver,
no
change
is
going
to
happen
to
green
space.
The
issue
here
is
that
the
existing
office
use
doesn't
have
a
very
high
green
space
requirement
and
we're
proposing
has
a
higher
green
space
requirement,
so
there
won't
be
any
change
to
the
green
space.
That's
there,
the
public's,
not
losing
anything
with
that,
and
the
last
one
is
the
buffer
there's
a
use
to
use
buffer
required
to
to
the
north
of
the
property
after
rezoning.
S
I
would
suggest
to
you
all-
and
this
is
what
arc
actually
suggested.
We
put
a
climbing
fence
with
climbing
vegetation,
and
I
would
suggest
that's
more
compatible
because
a
10-foot
buffer
and
a
masonry
wall
in
this
area
that
that
mixed
uses
are
all
over
the
place
and
you
have
dense
housing.
It
just
doesn't
make
any
sense
to
have
that
kind
of
used
to
use
buffer.
These
uses
are
compatible
together.
There's
no
issue,
and
because
of
that
we
have
an
erc
recommendation
of
approval.
S
They
discussed
the
waivers
at
length
and
decided
that
the
waivers
improve,
what's
there
today,
most
importantly
and
they're,
going
to
continue
the
life
of
historic
structure.
They
had
no
concerns
to
the
changes
of
the
exterior
of
the
structure
and
unanimously
voted
to
approve,
because
this
use
will
physically
improve
the
site
for
the
future.
As
ms
barnes
stated,
every
all
the
staff
found
this
consistent
with
except
transportation,
but
we
did
work
immensely
with
transportation
to
do
our
best
to
make
that
parking
fit,
but
there's
only
so
much
you
can
do
on
this
old
site.
S
K
K
Is
that
you
are
preserving
the
structure,
because
so
many
structures
surrounding
not
just
what
you
you
know,
you've
shown
you've
shown
what's
been
preserved
over
the
years,
but
so
many
other
structures,
for
example
the
former
home
of
a
former
tampa
city
council
member
peter
o'night,
was
there
and
it's
a
modern
structure.
Now
I
think
it's
an
apartment
or
condo
whatever,
but
it
was
on
that
street.
K
The
fact
is,
you
know
this
neighborhood
went
through
a
time
in
the
70s
80s,
where
it
was
not
the
hyde
park
that
we
know
today,
and
you
know
the
expressway
came
through
and
and
all
that
and
divided
that
area.
But
this
is
a
very
significant
contributing
structure.
You're,
preserving
it.
You
know
adapter
reuse,
as
you
meant,
as
you
mentioned,
the
waivers
in
the
parking
are
minimal,
as
we
saw
earlier
this
morning.
Talking
about
the
jackson
house,
ada
compliancy,
you
have
to
do
that.
K
S
K
So
this
is
great,
and
this
is
a
good
example
to
other
people
of
you-
don't
have
to
tear
everything
down.
You
can
reuse
it.
These
houses
are
big.
You
can
use
them
for
multiple
office
spaces
or
multiple
residential
units,
but
you
don't
have
to
knock
it
down
because
it's
old-
and
this
is
a
great
example
of
again
adaptive-
reuse
and
preserving
the
historic
nature
and
integrity
of
the
neighborhood.
So
I
think
this
is
great.
S
Also
happy
to
be
before
you
without
opposition,
we
didn't
have
opposition
at
the
arc
hearing
discussing
maintaining
a
structure
in
hyde
park,
and
you
know
that
that
was
really
helpful
in
coming
before
you
with
so
many
waivers,
because
if
you
just
look
at
the,
if
you
just
look
at
the
application,
it
doesn't
paint
the
whole
picture,
and
so,
while
I
feel
like
some
of
what
I
spoke
about
is
redundant,
it's
because
there's
more
to
the
application
than
what
is
in
the
black
and
white.
N
I
First
reading
consideration
owners,
re-zoning
property,
jennifer
senate
at
326,
south
plant
avenue
in
the
city
of
tampa
florida,
more
particularly
describing
section
one
from
zoning
districts,
classification,
r01
residential
office,
2pd
plan
development,
residential
multifamily,
providing
an
effective
date.
This
revision
sheet
has
shown
is
compatible.
The
compatibility
with
the
objective
will
cause
an
objective
policy.
I
The
comprehensive
plan
see
the
planning
commission
staff
report
proposed
developments
consistent
with
housing
policy
1.3.4
the
land
use
policy
1.1.1
and
2.1
too,
which
encourages
new
housing
on
vacant
land
and
utilizes
land
supplying
of
housing
is
available
to
meet
the
needs
of
tampa's
president
and
future
population.
I
He
proposed
development
is
adaptive
view
reuse
of
an
existing
contribution,
contribute
contribution,
I'm
so
tired,
I'm
speaking
greek
and
historic
structure
that
is
sensitive
and
respectable
to
the
neighborhood
character
and
compliance
with
the
land
use
policy,
1.2,
0.10,
3.5,
0.3,
16.1.2,
19.1.2
and
19.1.3.
I
L
E
E
E
Thank
you
well
agenda
item
number
13
file,
number
rec,
22-67,
miss
barnes.
A
Andy
barnes
development
coordination.
The
next
item
before
you
is
rec
2267
request,
is
to
re
rezone
property
located
at
3002
espanol
lane
3015
west
santiago
street
3105
bay,
oaks,
court,
3015,
south
isabella
avenue
from
rm
35
and
planned
development,
which
was
rec
2038
to
pd
plain
development
for
residential
multi-family
and
interim
parking
uses
all
turnover,
presentations
to
plane,
efficient.
Q
Same
thomas
with
their
planning
commission
staff,
this
is
located
in
the
south
tampa
planning
district
in
the
bay
shore,
gardens
neighborhood.
The
closest
transit
stop
is
0.2
miles
north
of
the
civic
site
at
the
corner
of
isabella
and
beta
bay
boulevard.
The
closest
recreational
facility
is
fred
ball
park,
located
approximately
1500
feet
to
the
northeast
of
the
site,
and
it
is
within
a
level
b,
evacuation
zone.
Q
Here's
the
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
the
surrounding
area
is
predominantly
residential
in
character,
with
a
mixture
of
multi-family
and
attached
residential
with
some
scattered
detached
residential
uses
in
the
area
some
office
and
like
commercial
uses,
are
located
to
the
north
of
the
subject:
site
centered,
mainly
along
west
bay,
to
bay
boulevard.
Q
Here
is
a
map
of
the
adopter
adopted
future
land
use.
Like
our
previous
case,
this
is
also
within
the
residential
50
future
land
use
designation,
which
a
lot
intends
for
high
and
medium
density
on
residential
uses
to
the
south
of
it
is
more
of
the
residential
50
and
the
light
pinkish
purple
color
is
the
community
mix
use
35,
designation
and
the
darker
color
that
you
see
around
here
darker
brownish
color,
that
is
the
residential
83
category
and
then
to
the
west
on
the
other
side
of
the
salmon?
Q
Is
the
community
commercial
35
future
land
use
designation
on?
You
can
see
a
little
bit
of
the
recreational
open
space
up
here
for
fred
ball
park
that
I
mentioned
and
then
down
to
the
south,
where
the
blue
is,
is
public,
semi
public,
which
is
the
academy
of
holy
names?
Q
Q
The
pd
pro
the
density
is
the
density
intensity.
The
intensity
of
the
site
is
consistent
with
the
future
land
use
designation
of
residential
50..
The
proposed
pd
includes
one
27
story
tower
and
130
story
tower
and
townhomes.
Many
of
the
townhomes
set
front
doors
and
entrances
along
santiago
street,
which
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
Q
Q
Q
The
proposed
200
dwelling
units
at
the
density
of
36
jolly
units
per
acre
is
consistent
with
the
long-term
development
pattern
envisioned
under
the
r50
future
land
use
designation
and
will
provide
additional
housing
options
for
tampa's
growing
population.
This
includes
my
presentation,
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Any.
A
The
as
sam
already
said
that
there's
additional
acreage
being
added,
as
well
as
additional
units
that
are
being
added
from
the
previously
approved
pd
for
the
residential
multi-family
and
parking
uses
interim
parking
uses.
I
do
want
to
make
a
note
for
the
record
that,
in
accordance
with
section
27
21,
the
consistency
matrix,
the
proposal
of
200
dwelling
units
is
consistent
with
our
50
future
land
juice,
and
there
are
some
modifications
to
the
waivers.
So
I
do
have
a
revised
waiver
sheet
that
they
happily
hand
in.
If
approving
the
application.
A
A
A
So
I
don't
know
if
you
can
should
be
able
to
see
it,
so
maybe
I
can
get
both
on
here.
This
is
what
was
the
pd
boundaries
under
2038
and
these
are
the
the
current
boundaries.
So
I
wonder
if
I
can.
A
So
you
can
see,
there's
a
little
there's
a
parcel
added
here
to
the
north.
Can
you
see
that
okay.
A
A
A
A
Overall
development
review
and
compliance
staff
finds
the
request
inconsistent.
Please
refer
to
natural
resources
and
development
coordination
comments
for
overall
inconsistency
and
modifications
to
the
site
plan
must
be
completed
by
the
applicant
between
first
and
second
reading
of
the
ordinance,
as
stated
on
the
revision
sheet
of
approving
the
application,
and
I
will
hand
in
that
revision
sheet.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
O
Good
evening
council,
my
name
is
tyler
hudson,
my
address
is
400.
North
ashley
drive
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
with
me
here
this
evening
are
some
representatives
from
related,
which
is
the
project
developer.
We
have
mike
hammon
najwahab
and
sam
horton,
we
also
last
but
not
least,
certainly
alex
schaeler
from
my
law
firm.
We
also
have
a
group
of
experts,
some
of
which
are
here
with
us,
some
of
which
are
appearing
virtually
from
kimley
horn,
which
is
our
project
civil
engineer.
O
We
have
artie
cintron,
who
is
here
from
architect,
tonica
the
project
designer
we
have
patrick
giannini
who's
available,
virtually
and
finally
ricky
padarica
with
dark
moss.
Who
is
the
project?
Arborist
is
also
available
virtually
and
did
a
great
job
sort
of
set
the
table
about
exactly
where
we're
talking
about.
This
is
a
project
that
this
council
approved
back
in
november
of
2020
for
a
two
two
tower
condo
development
with
some
townhomes
along
santiago,
the
project's
buffeted
on
the
west
by
the
crosstown.
O
It
goes
right
up
against
it
on
the
east
by
bayshore
boulevard
and
this
what
cuts
between
it
between
the
two
phases
I'm
going
to
talk
about
is
santiago,
and
then
you
can
see
a
little
bit
poking
up
to
the
north.
That's
beta
bay
really
do
opposite
the
on-ramp
onto
the
expressway
at
beta
bay.
I
think
it's
important
to
note
that
yellow
line
there,
where
santiago,
is
everything
below
that,
where
it's
still
shaded
in
red,
that's
the
portion
of
the
project
that
we're
proposing
no
changes
to
at
all.
That's
phase
one!
O
That's
currently
under
construction
now,
so
for
purposes
of
this
project.
Sorry,
this
application,
no
changes,
are
being
proposed.
Hopefully
this
might
show
a
little
bit
easier.
What
annie
was
trying
to
show
on
the
elmo
the
area
in
blue?
That's
the
area
of
land
that
was
acquired
subsequent
to
the
november
2020
rezoning
approval
and
getting
that
land
and
I'll
show
this
in
a
second,
it
gave
us
the
ability
to
redesign
some
of
the
features
in
a
way
that
we
think
is
going
to
make
santiago
an
even
better,
east-west
connection
between
macdill
and
bayshore.
O
Beta
bay
is
a
little
bit
cramped
on
the
south
side
of
beta
bay,
due
to
some
of
the
offices
that
are
almost
protruding
into
the
right-of-way
there.
So
making
santiago
a
really
walkable,
vibrant
street
something's
been
critically
important,
and
this
land
area
edition
allows
us
to
do
that.
As
you
can
see,
without
that
blue
area,
it's
a
bit
of
a
thin
site,
and
so
having
that
blue
was
was
quite
helpful,
as
this
council
knows
very
very
well.
Pd's
are
very
specific
documents.
O
O
We
actually
took
advantage
of
that
last
year
by
adding
a
couple
feet
to
the
height
there's
other
types
of
changes
that
are
deemed
substantial,
there's
a
list
of
14
of
them
they're
on
on
the
screen
right
here,
and
if
you
make
any
of
these
changes,
we
come
right
back
here,
and
so,
while
this
presents
as
a
new
rezoning,
we
have
a
new
rezoning
number.
This
is
really,
I
think,
it's
helpful
to
think
of
this
as
a
modification
to
a
site.
O
That's
that's
already
entitled
and
we
think
it's
a
relatively
minor
change
as
things
go
but
as
you'll
see
they're
number
two.
An
increase
in
land
area
is
a
really
much
an
automatic,
come
back
to
city
council.
So
that's
that's.
Why
we're
here
before
you
this
evening
just
to
show
the
original
approval.
I
think
this
goes
to
show
how
the
portion
of
the
site
that's
north
of
santiago.
That
kind
of
thin
diagonal
was
a
really
pretty
pretty
much
on
the
thin
side.
It
was
for
180
units
again
split
between
the
two
towers.
O
You
can
see.
You
can
see
my
mouse.
These
are
the
townhomes
here
and
there
are
also
some
town
homes
here
as
well.
After
this
was
approved,
we
did
process
a
non-substantial
change
determination
request
to,
like
I
said,
increased
by
five
units
that
was
actually
affected
by
converting
one
of
the
mezzanine
levels
to
deliverable
drilling
units,
and
we
also
made
some
minor
modifications
to
the
height
here.
You
see
I'm
just
going
to
toggle
back
and
forth,
just
for
a
second
to
see
a
little
bit
of
the
difference,
so
you
can
see
it's
pretty
thin
there.
O
It
is
more
of
a
kind
of
like
a
backwards
number
by
acquiring
the
parcel.
That's
north
of
santiago
but
east
of
where
we
originally
were.
It's
gonna
allow
us
to
rotate
the
site,
so
it
runs
kind
of
linear
from
in
a
linear
sense,
parallel
to
santiago,
instead
of
pointing
towards
the
crosstown
off-ramp.
What
that's
going
to
do
is
allow
us
to
bring
the
you
can
see
here
the
vehicular
traffic
for
the
second
tower
it
was
on
santiago.
O
Now
it's
going
to
be
off
isabella
we're
also
going
to
be
able
to
put
three
townhomes
fronting
santiago
along
with
three.
It's
called
multi-family
housing,
townhouse
style,
it's
not
a
land
use.
You
guys
see
very
often.
These
three
units
here
are
going
to
really
be
fronting
beta
bay
and
that's
a
really
nice
design
upgrade
because
under
the
original
approval,
it
was
a
parking
garage
that
was
facing
beta
bay.
O
So
if
these
townhomes
are
going
to
be
a
much
much
better
feature,
we're
also
going
to
be
able
to
save
and
I'm
going
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
natural
resources
in
a
second
a
a
grand
tree.
That's
located
right
about
here,
so
in
terms
of
staff
as
any
walkthrough
we
we
are
inconsistent
with
natural
resources.
However,
we
we
are
consistent
on
the
comp
plan,
which,
legally
speaking,
is
pretty
important.
We
were
consistent
with
transportation
too,
which
is
counseling
is
not
necessarily
always
always
easy
to
get.
O
We
are
consistent,
I
think,
by
code
with
with
most
of
the
provisions
that
are
applicable,
but
there
are
a
couple
of
areas
that
we
we
run
afoul
of
the
strict
interpretation
of
the
code.
I
want
to
walk
through
those
now.
These
are
the
waivers
that
we're
requesting,
and
these
are
just
to
convert
new
waivers
that
were
not
approved
in
connection
with
the
prior
rezoning.
O
The
first
is
buffering
what
you're
looking
at
here,
these
multi-story
offices-
these
are
those
buildings
that
are
on
beta
bay.
That
sometimes
seem
like
they're
about
to
fall
into
the
street,
because
there's
really
no
sidewalk,
there
they're
really
right
at
beta
bay,
because
these
are
technically
different
uses.
It
would
require
us
or
nearly
have
a
15
foot
separation
with
the
masonry
wall.
We
want
to
take
that
down
to
seven,
and
I
think
this
will
make
a
little
bit
more
sense.
O
When
I
talk
about
the
grand
trees,
if
we
had
to
comply
with
a
full
15
foot
waiver
here,
it
would
push
the
building
back
in
a
way
that
would
severely
interrupt
what
we're
trying
to
do
with
santiago
street
second
waiver
that
we're
requesting
is
not.
This
might
be
a
first
for
this
council.
If
you
have
a
multi-family
dwelling
unit,
that
is
quote
townhouse
style,
that's
a
separate
type
of
use.
O
Under
your
code,
you
have
to
integrate
parking
either
under
the
building
or
actually
inside
the
the
townhome
style
unit
which,
as
you
can
imagine,
might
not
really
work
out
very
well,
because
cars
do
take
up
a
lot
of
space.
So
what
we're
doing
here
is
we're
just
providing
three
parking
spaces
that
are
surface
spaces
right
here
and
so
for
the
folks
who
live
in
these
three
townhomes
they'll
have
to
have
to
take
an
umbrella,
but
it's
it's
just
not
feasible
for
us
to
integrate
those
three
parking
spaces
into
the
structures
themselves.
O
So
let's
talk
about
natural
resources,
so
there
are
two
separate
waivers
that
we
are
requesting.
I
want
to
talk
about
them
separately.
The
the
first
involves
the
retention
and
the
second
is
about
the
grand
tree.
So,
ordinarily,
a
site
like
this
would
have
to
retain
50
of
the
trees
on
site.
We're
not
able
to
do
that.
The
number
of
trees
we're
able
to
retain
on
site
is
represents
about
four
percent.
O
The
reason
for
that
is
because
the
pattern
of
development
that
existed
on
this
site
prior
to
this,
the
november
2020
rezoning,
was
a
12
building,
two
to
three
story:
garden
style
apartment
project,
with
enormous
amounts
of
surface
parking
lot
that
was
built
in
1974..
O
What
we're
proposing
about
176
units
total
we're
at
200
so
actually
providing
more
density,
but
we're
stacking
that
density
into
the
form
of
two
towers
and
some
townhomes,
which
is
going
to
afford
us
a
lot
more
opportunity
for
canopy
replacement.
Can
it
be
replenishment
through
the
landscape
process
will
deal
with
a
permitting?
That's
that's
not
now,
and
what
I
have
on
screen
is
an
attempt
to
show
what
we
have
in
mind
from
a
landscape
architecture
perspective
to
bring
back
a
lot
of
the
the
canopy.
O
That's
there
now,
but
we
think
with
more
vibrant,
healthier
trees
that
are
that
are
better
located.
There
is
a
grand
tree
right
here
along
santiago
that
we
are
going
to
keep
that's
going
to
be
a
really
important
part
of
again
the
place
making
at
santiago
which
is
critical
to
this
project.
O
This
is
a
grand
tree
in
yellow
that
we
cannot
keep,
and
I
want
to
talk
about
why
one
thing-
and
I
will
note
too,
between
the
two
grand
trees
they
have
pretty
similar
ratings.
Ricky
pottery
can
go
into
an
enormous
amount
of
detail
about
this,
but
to
make
it
fairly
short,
the
tree
down
here
has
a
c6
rating.
It's
40
inches
wide
the
tree
that
the
grand
tree
that
we
are
seeking
removal
of
has
a
marginally
worse
rating
and
it's
33
inches.
O
The
reason
this
tree
has
to
go
out
and
I
would
know
in
our
original
application
for
this
rezoning,
not
november
2020,
this
substantial
change,
rezoning.
We
we
didn't
include
this
green
tree
as
being
removed.
We
did
not
want
to
remove
this
tree.
What
we,
what
happened
after
the
course
of
filing
and
right
before
drc,
maybe
right
after
drc,
found
out
that
there
are
certain
osha
requirements.
When
you
dig
deep
holes
and
when
you
build
tall
buildings,
you
have
to
dig
deep
holes
for
the
footers
for
the
excavation
and
osha.
O
The
regulator
within
the
federal
department
of
labor
requires
that
when
you
dig
really
deep
holes,
you
have
certain
regulations
that
affect
the
side
walls.
So
the
excavation
holes
don't
collapse
in
on
themselves
and
there's
rules
about
slope
and
because
of
the
sloping
of
the
sidewalls
for
the
very
large
hole
that
we
have
to
dig
to
support
the
very
large
footers
we
have
to
put
in
the
ground
for
the
fairly
tall
building.
That's
going
to
go
on
top.
O
That
tree
cannot
be
saved
because
at
least
25
percent
of
the
root
base
would
be
destroyed
to
to
save
that.
We
would
be
at
the
expense
of
moving
the
building
southward,
which
would
be
problematic,
for
we
think
the
larger
more
appropriately
placed
or
more
fortunately
placed
I
would
say,
grand
tree-
that's
on
santiago.
O
This
is
what
we
have
in
mind
for
for
santiago
again,
the
bid
going
from
going
eastbound
on
beta
bay
to
get
from
south
tampa
to
bay
shore
on
the
south
side
of
beta
bay.
There's
no
sidewalks!
You
will
see
folks
on
bikes
with
strollers
in
the
weaving
in
beta
bay.
The
right
of
way.
Our
goal
is
that
santiago
can
become
a
nice
through
connection
from
mcdill
over
east
into
bay
shore.
Then
you'll
go
up
on
the
beach
or
sidewalk
and
go
across
the
dedicated,
safer
pedestrian
crossing
at
beta
bay.
O
This
has
been
again
a
focal
point
of
the
development
is
to
develop
santiago
into
a
nice
really
walkable
intentionally
done
place
and
there's
gonna
be
a
lot
of
tree
replanting
there
and
there
is
gonna,
be
one
grand
tree.
We're
able
to
preserve
that
we're
that's
very
important,
but
that
is
in
transparency.
Gonna
come
at
the
loss
of
one
grand
tree
that
we
have
explored
every
avenue
to
save,
including
changing
how
the
foundation
pilings
had
worked.
O
There,
nothing
nothing
worked,
and
here's
just
a
little
bit
of
a
concept
design
of
some
other
kind
of
canopy
restoration.
This
is
not
going
to
be
at
ground
level,
but
it's
very
important
to
the
developer.
Based
on
these
are
going
to
be
condominium
units.
These
aren't
going
to
be
apartment
units
based
on
what
they're
selling
to
the
public
of
how
important
verden,
green
space
and
canopy
restoration
is.
These
are
what
will
be
will
go
into
the
landscaping
permit
drawings.
E
Just
for
mitigation
trees,
how
are
you
going
to
mitigate
the
the
tree
loss?
How
is
ritz
carlton
going
to
handle
that.
O
Sure
I
I'm
going
to
ask
ricky
to
step
in
if
I'm
saying
anything
wrong,
but
to
start,
I
know
that
we're
committed
on
the
site
plan
to
replacing
with
68
trees,
I
believe,
there's
a
total
loss
of
51
trees.
So
we
we
we
are
replacing
more
than
we
than
we
are
taking
out
and
that's
candidly,
not
just
out
of
some
measure
of
generosity.
That's
what
the
code
requires.
We
add
up
the
vua
vehicular
use
area,
aka
parking
lot,
trees,
plus
the
other
trees
based
on
the
credit
debit
system
that
were
in
ricky's
presentation.
O
So
we
it's
something
that
in
mike
with
related,
could
talk
about
this.
This
is
a
ritz
carlton
branded
condominium.
Green
space
is
something
that's
extremely
important
in
all
their
products
around
the
country
and
again
this
isn't
our
rental
product
we
are.
We
are
selling
we
mike
and
his
team
are
selling
units
based
on
depictions
and
renderings
of
green
space
that
we're
absolutely
committed
to,
because
if
it's
not
there,
we're
going
to
have
a
problem
with
the
folks
we're
we're
selling
these
units
to.
F
E
Did
you
did
you
hear
my
question?
Well,
how
is
ritz
carlton
going
to
going
to
mitigate
the
trees
that
are
going
to
be
taken
out.
G
G
Related,
I
don't
have
the
number
of
what
that
mitigation
is,
unfortunately,
but
whatever
remainder
obviously
would
be
covered
if
any
remainder
exists.
E
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
didn't
quite
quite
get
that
mr
puerto
rico,
but
I'm
sure
that
the
ritz
carlton
will
hold
true
on
its
promise
for
green
space.
Thank
you.
Any
other
questions.
H
I
can't
help
but
notice
that
in
the
pictures
that
were
shown
just
a
few
minutes
ago
with
the
structure
that
they
are
building,
which
is
directly
across
the
street
from
my
home,
in
which
I've
lived
for
19
years,
they
did
not
bother
to
show
the
picture
of
my
home
directly
across
the
street,
where
they
have
been
trashing,
my
yard,
where
they
have
been
trashing
my
car,
where
they
have
destroyed
part
of
the
other
end
of
our
units,
and
they
continue
to
use
that
street
as
if
it
were
their
own
private
driveway
and
have
made
it
very
difficult
for
me
to
get
in
or
out
of
my
home
aside,
from
which
you
were
just
speaking
about
the
trees
that
they
were
selling
the
homes
based
on
the
trees
that
they
use
in
their
advertisement
are
the
trees
on
my
property
actually-
and
I
know
this
because
I'm
very
close
to
them
and
I
keep
very
good
care
of
them,
and
I
think
that
with
them
purchasing
this
set
of
townhouses
that
you're,
seeing
at
the
end
of
the
block
there.
I
I
H
Up
after
the
ritz
carlton
and
I'm
concerned
that
you're,
adding
20
units
and
the
people
next
door,
who
did
kind
of
the
same
thing,
said
that
they
would
have
more
than
enough
parking
they're,
the
ones
who
are
parking
on
the
under
the
no
parking
signs.
I
can't
even
get
a
police
officer
out
there
to
do
anything
about
it,
because.
D
H
H
K
So
we
heard
the
the
speaker
before
us
and
her
concerns,
and,
coincidentally,
at
the
beginning
of
today's
meeting
or
this
evening's
meeting,
we
were
talking
about
a
big
stormwater
project
in
seminole
heights
and
I'm
sure
you're
familiar
with
it.
Mr
hudson,
it's
been
in
the
news
and
whatnot
and
the
havoc
that
it
has
caused
to
the
residents
there
and
the
businesses
completely
different,
but
this
individual
is.
She
lives
there
for
19
years,
she's
already
had
to
deal
with
the
previous
construction
talking
about
materials
falling
in
the
driveway
and
whatnot.
K
K
Are
they
parking
everywhere?
What
about
if
there
are
so
many
construction,
trucks
and
other
vehicles,
an
emergency
vehicle
can't
get
through
there,
that's
another
issue
that
could
happen.
She
is
unable
to
get
out
of
her
driveway
because
of
poor
or
zero
visibility.
I
mean
that's
it's
an
accident
and
a
liability
issue
right
there
waiting
to
happen.
O
A
couple
things
in
terms
of
the
questions
about
the
facts-
I
I'm
not
sure
construction
is
disruptive
and,
as
we
saw
in
the
first
item
that
you
had,
communication
is
really
key
to
that.
I
think
relied.
It
related
prides
itself
on
being
a
very
good
neighbor.
O
You
may
recall
that
this
was
a
very
controversial
rezoning
back
in
november
of
2020
and
since
then
mike
and
the
related
team
have
done
a
lot
to
work
with
particularly
the
tower
the
two
towers
that
this
site
is
between
and
we're
proud
that
there
isn't
a
lot
of
opposition,
but
it
sounds
like
we
could
still
do
more.
O
So
I'd
like
to
have
mike
address
some
of
the
specific
concerns
that
jill
or
austin
raised
and
about
how
they've
handled
complaints
that
they
have
received,
because
there
have
been
complaints
in
candor
and
I
think
we've
been
able
to
deal
with
a
lot
of
them
effectively,
but
I
think
there's
some
probably
more
work
to
do
so.
That
might
get
to
that.
S
T
H
I
think
you
know,
I
think
one
of
you
mentioned
it
earlier
about
it's
a
lot
of
babysitting
and
it
is-
and
we
know
that
and
we've
worked
very
hard
with
the
stovall
and
with
the
aquatica
condominium
associations.
We
have
direct
communications
with
them.
If
there's
a
problem,
they
have
numbers
that
they
can
call
immediately.
H
O
Condominiums
regarding.
H
H
O
H
H
Parking
there
creating
any
hazard
or
blocking
views
there.
So
again
we
try
to
be
the
best
neighbor
we
can
of
those
townhouses
there
they're,
not
an
association.
So
there's
not
like
a
single
point
of
contact
I'll,
take
her
information
and
we'll
work
with
her
and
make
sure
that
she
has
a
point
of
contact
on
our
side.
I
know
probably
three
of
the
other
owners
in
those
townhomes
and
we
actually
own
one
of
those
town
homes
in
there,
so
we're
familiar
with
how
they're
set
up
and
how
they
operate.
K
H
K
I
mean
just
like
when
people
contact
us,
we
contact
the
contractor.
You
know
they
look
to
us
to
help
them
they're
living
there
and
dealing
with
this
24
7.,
even
though
there's
not
construction
at
midnight
whatever,
but
if
it's
starting
at
4
30
in
the
morning
when
it
should
be
starting
at
seven
o'clock
right,
you.
O
R
K
G
H
N
I
guess
the
most
concerning
of
it
all
was
it
mike,
that's
mike
mike,
it
was
so
fast
mike,
I
guess
the
most
concerned
at
all.
If
if
people
have
to
go
to
work
and
4
30
in
the
morning,
it's
a
little
bit
early,
so
I
I.
N
N
O
H
O
F
T
E
J
When
I
say
I
mean
our
residents
are
frustrated
by
the
amount
of
construction,
that's
going
on
as
we
try
to
improve
things
with
storm
water
as
as
developments
come,
but
I'm
going
to
say
that
if
we
approve
this
on
first
reading,
I'm
going
to
to
wonder
if
she
comes
back
and
says
that
things
are
better
because
we
we
simply
can't
keep
doing
this,
I'm
not
quite
sure,
what's
gone
on
that
now,
the
policing
of
subcontractors
is
so
difficult,
but
but
you
have
to
rein
it
in.
J
H
J
So
I
I'm
gonna
expect
to
hear
from
jill
in
midterm
to
find
out
if,
if
anything
is
improved
because-
and
I
mean
I'm
happy
to
give
you
my
number
two,
so
you
can
call
me
at
4
30
in
the
morning
just
because,
if
she's
having
that
problem,
she
can't
be
the
only
one.
So
I
I
just
like
you
aren't
the
only
one
that's
having
this
problem,
but
we
owe
it
to
everyone
to
nip
it
in
the
bud
to
save
save
everyone.
D
Thank
you
if
I
may
just
respond.
This
is
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
I
understand
the
comments
that
were
made:
jc
hutchison,
our
building
official
deals
with
issues
related
to
early
start
times
on
construction
and
late.
They
now
have
a
code
enforcement
unit,
so
I'm
going
to
reach
out
to
jc
and
just
let
them
know
what
we
heard
tonight.
D
I
would
not
encourage
members
of
the
public
to
contact
our
council
members
with
regard
to
those
issues,
given
that
this
is
still
pending
before
council,
and
I
wouldn't
want
there
to
be
any
potential
communications
that
the
applicant
would
consider
to
be
prejudicial,
so
I'd
like
to
handle
it
through
construction
services.
If
you
don't
mind,
point.
J
Taken
and
I
appreciate
that,
if
you
wouldn't
mind
sharing
his
number
with
her,
though.
E
E
K
Regarding
part,
three
section
27-284.2.5f1.
E
F
F
S
F
A
K
Q
This
is
located
in
the
south
tampa
planning
district
in
the
palmacio
west
neighborhood,
the
closest
transit
stop
is
0.3
miles
away
from
the
subject
site
at
south
del
mar
highway
and
west
neptune
street.
The
closest
recreational
facility
is
cal,
dickerson
tennis
complex,
which
is
approximately
0.2
miles
to
the
northwest,
and
the
site
is
within
a
level
c
evacuation
zone.
Q
Here's
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site.
As
you
can
see,
the
surrounding
area
along
henderson
boulevard
is
mainly
on
commercial
uses
and
then,
once
you
go
north
and
south
of
henderson
boulevard,
you
transition
to
predominantly
a
single
family,
detached
residential
neighborhood.
Q
Here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
The
subject
site
is
recognized
under
the
cmu
35
future
land
use,
designation
to
the
north
of
the
site
and
the
oranges.
Color
is
the
residential
10,
future
land
use,
designation
and
then
to
the
south
of
the
site
and
the
light
yellow
is
the
even
lower
density,
residential,
six,
featureless
induced
designation.
Q
I
did
forget
to
mention
that
there
is
well
the
area.
This
is
the
light
orange
and
or
the
orange
and
white
yellow
is
predominantly
single
family.
There
is,
I
think,
a
few
or
maybe
one
multi-family
complex,
directly
adjacent
to
the
site.
Q
The
applicant
is-
and
I
do
need
to
make
a
correction
to
our
staff
report.
Our
staff
report
incorrectly
listed
the
far
as
0.24
and
the
far
is
actually
0.17,
so
the
applicant
is
proposing
a
0.17
far,
which
is
below
the
intensity
intensity
anticipated
under
the
cmu
35
designation
planning.
Commission
step
has
reviewed
the
application
and
found
no
adverse
impacts
to
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
Q
The
reasoning
will
allow
for
better
utilization
of
the
land
that
is
consistent
with
the
intensity
anticipated
under
the
cmu
35
designation,
the
comprehensive
plan
for
pedestrian
safety
and
encouraging
commercial
development
to
enhance
the
city
of
tampa's
character
and
ambiance.
In
doing
so,
commercial
developments
are
encouraged
to
connect
the
building
entrances
to
public
right-of-ways.
Q
The
proposed
plan
development
is
providing
a
five
foot
sidewalk
along
grady
avenue,
which
is
cons
which
will
connect
the
existing
sidewalk
along
henderson
boulevard.
The
proposed
sidewalks
along
all
adjacent
right
aways
will
help
ensure
the
sidewalks
interconnect
with
future
developments
in
the
area.
In
conclusion,
the
proposed
pd
zoning
would
allow
for
development
that
is
compatible
and
comparable
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
neighborhood
and
is
consistent
with
the
development
pattern
anticipated
under
the
cmu
35
future
language.
Designation.
A
Annie
barnes
development
coordination,
rec
2297
is
supposed
to
rezone
from
cg
to
pd
for
restaurant
and
all
cg
uses
for
4004
henderson
boulevard.
A
A
A
total
the
the
applicant
is
requesting
several
waivers,
and
one
of
the
waivers
regarding
transportation
is
to
reduce
the
number
of
total
parking
spaces
from
25
to
21..
A
The
future
land
use
is
cmu
35.
The
requested,
far
of
0.17
is
consistent
with
that
future
land
use
overall
development
review
and
compliance
staff
found
the
request
inconsistent
based
on
transportation
comments.
However,
development
coordination
found
the
request
consistent.
A
T
Good
evening
city,
council,
ryan
manassee,
I'm
with
johnson
pope
law
firm,
I'm
their
director
of
development
located
at
401,
east
jackson,
street
suite
3100
tampa
33602
we're
here
tonight,
representing
streetlight
tacos,
for
the
proposed
rezoning
requested,
as
andy
stated,
from
cg
to
pd
plan
development
for
that
restaurant
use
and
all
cg
uses
in
our
in
our
review
of
this
is
kind
of
a
textbook
redevelopment
case
where
planning
and
construction
occurred
prior
to
the
code,
which
makes
the
site
unique
with
any
kind
of
redevelopment
and
I'll.
Further
explain
that
as
well
on
screen.
T
Right
here
is
well,
it's
the
the
last
flat
which
is
from
1924,
but
this
was
originally
planned
in
1915
and
construction
of
the
site
actually
occurred
on
the
existing
structure
in
1957.
I'll
orientate
this
a
little
bit
just
so
you
know
where
we're
at
so
here's
henderson
and
then
there's
grady
avenue
and
additionally,
on
the
survey.
I
just
highlighted
some
green
areas
and
you'll
see
that
throughout
some
of
my
slide
presentations
for
ease
of
understanding
where
the
sidewalks
are
located
in
green
space,
etc.
T
Again
the
property
boundary.
If
you'll
see
here,
it's
not,
as
you
may
look
at
this
and
think
out
here,
this
is
the
actual
property
boundary.
It's
almost
a
triangle
shaped
property,
and
then
it
runs
up
here
and
here.
So
this
is
a
very
uniquely
shaped
lot
again,
it's
a
platted
lot
of
record
and
this
is
an
existing
structure
that
we're
going
to
be
adding
to
or
through
this
proposal.
T
Currently
there
is
parking
located
off
the
henderson.
You
have
your
access
here
and
these
diagonal
spaces
and
then
it
wraps
around
into
an
existing
drive-through
as
well
as
there's
parking
located
here.
That's
within
the
right-of-way
and
there's
maneuvering
in
the
right-of-way,
and
then
you
have
exit
and
I'll
show
you
in
an
aerial
slide.
T
T
Additionally,
the
existing
structure-
if
you
calculate
the
the
outline
which
would
be
I'll
try
to
point
out
for
you
here,
is
right
here,
this
white
area,
that's
the
existing
building,
and
then
you
have
these
two
large
outdoor
patio
areas
and
the
outdoor
patio
deck
here,
and
that
that
combined
area
is
roughly
about
23
2400
square
feet
and
that
again
includes
that
indoor
and
outdoor
area.
T
Again
there
is
an
existing
drive-through
and
then
what
we're
going
to
show
next
is
just
the
aerial
where
I
just
showed
you
some
arrows
re-explaining
how
that
circulation
may
work.
T
I'm
not
condoning
this,
but,
as
you
can
see
in
the
back
near
grady,
there's
a
nothing
but
asphalt
and
obviously
you
can
come
in
and
off
grade
the
avenue
go
in
this
way,
possibly
down
the
wrong
way
and
then
there's
double
x.
It's
on
to
henderson,
so
fast
forwarding
to
what
we're
proposing
to
you,
we're
proposing
this
rezone
rezoning
and
re-establishing
some
proper
ingress
and
egress
points.
As
you'll
see,
we
have
parking
located
here,
which
is
pretty
much
the
existing
area,
but
these
are
compact
spaces,
which
does
relate
to
one
of
our
waivers.
T
We're
asking
from
transportation
that
equates
to
one
additional
compact
space,
we're
requesting
and
again
that's
to
facilitate
as
many
parking
spaces
that
we
can
on
the
site
to
help
traffic
patrons
and
the
neighboring
community.
Additionally,
something
you'll
notice
is,
and
again
I
highlighted
the
green
areas.
The
hatch
screen
areas
would
be
the
on
property
green
space
and
then
the
other
green
areas
just
help
illuminate
where
we're
going
to
add
green
space
and
sidewalk
to
the
existing
sidewalk
along
henderson.
T
So
you
have
henderson
here
and
then
there
was
no
sidewalk
here.
We
would
be
adding
that
to
complete
that
connection
and
then
coming
off
of
henderson
going
down
grady
avenue,
providing
the
sidewalk
within
the
ride
away
for
code
and
these
proper
ingress
and
egress
points
again.
This
directional
circulation
provides
for
safety.
T
T
It
had
to
get
converted
to
a
pd
due
to
the
additional
waivers,
but
we
did
nix
the
drive-in
window
due
to
safety
concerns
and
jonathan
scott
of
lee
pointed
out
some
of
those
safety
concerns
and
we
could
have
came
and
asked
for
the
waiver
and
gone
with
that,
but
instead
we
decided,
you
know
what
this
helps
buffer
the
rear
of
the
building
that
has
never
had
that
type
of
buffer,
at
least
in
my
review
of
the
property,
and
it
provides
more
safety
for
circulation
again.
T
The
sidewalk
here
connects
the
front,
the
grady
avenue
and
anderson
avenue
to
the
structure
and
we're
providing
bicycle
parking
as
well,
so
again
on
site
we're
providing
21
parking
spaces.
There
is
a
minor
reduction
that
we
are
requesting
with
that,
but
we
believe,
with
the
alternate
means
that
you
can
use
bicycles
and
our
bike
rack
that's
located
here.
T
In
addition
to
the
walkability
and
the
more
pedestrian
friendly
design.
We
we
think
that's
justified
with
that.
Additionally,
we
add
green
space,
as
I
stated,
and
just
this
area
alone
adds
this
additional
buffer.
That's
currently
not
even
in
existence
with
this
establishment
and
then
one
of
the
this
slide.
This
is
just
combining
the
two
slides
that
I
briefly
went
over,
so
the
existing
is
on
the
right
and
the
propose
is
on
the
left,
and
this
is
better
to
outline
the
configuration
and
again
just
to
familiarize
yourself,
I'm
sorry
with
the
site.
T
So
with
that
all
other
reviewers
with
staff
were
consistent,
except
for
transportation,
as
annie
pointed
out,
and
we
would
respectfully
request
your
approval
and
I'm
here
for
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
E
E
T
A
Annie
barnes
development
coronation
the
ab2
associated
with
this
is
ab2213
for
4004
henderson
boulevard.
A
A
There
are
indoor
and
outdoor
av
sales
area
as
listed
on
the
site
plan.
There
is
our
is
already
talked
or
already
clarified.
The
applicant
is
requesting
several
waivers
through
the
rezoning,
including
reduction
parking,
and
the
site
plan
does
state
that
the
proposed
hours
are
consistent
with
chapter
14..
A
T
Thank
you,
ryan,
manassee,
again
with
johnson
pope
law
firm,
their
director
of
development,
401,
east
jackson,
street
suite
3100
tampa
florida
33602
and
for
this
request
were
again,
the
applicant
being
streetlight
tacos
were
proposing
a
special
use,
2
request
for
alcoholic
beverages
for
a
small
venue,
the
proposed
use
being
the
restaurant
and
I'll
put
this
on
the
screen.
T
So
this
is
going
to
look
very
familiar,
obviously
I'll.
I
won't
go
over
super
the
rezoning
details
again
with
the
alcohol
stick
to
the
alcohol.
The
small
venue
is
for
beer,
wine
and
liquor
consumption
on
premises.
Only
there's
three
a
b
areas
and
the
large
area
would
be
the
indoor
area
at
2193
square
feet.
The
immediate
adjacent
outdoor
area
is
287
square
feet
along
henderson
and
then
in
this
corner,
where
henderson
and
grady
collide
or
come-
or
I
don't
know
if
it's
collide,
I'm
just
gonna
use
that
term.
T
Unless
jonathan
corrects
me,
the
768
square
feet
router
area
too,
so
combined
av
area
that
we're
requesting
is
3248
square
feet
again.
These
are
the
three
av
areas
and
we're
providing
the
21
parking
spaces.
Any
land
use
waivers
are
requested
on
the
rezoning.
So
the
one
waiver
we
are
requesting
here
is
from
the
distance
to
residential
uses.
T
Again
this
is
an
existing
structure
that
we
are
adding
on
to
that.
Existing
footprint
is
almost
the
same,
except
for
we're
enclosing
a
lot
of
that
area
to
try
to
make
some
more
area
for
the
restaurant
and
again
this
retains
the
same
details
at
the
rezoning
wood
with
the
ingress
and
egress
access
onto
from
henderson
and
directional
traffic,
and
then
these
proper
vua
areas
with
landscaping
and
buffering
for
the
rear
to
include
ada
spaces
and
these
three
parallel
parking
spaces.
T
It
does
have
the
sidewalk
again
that
connects
for
our
site
to
henderson.
With
that
being
said,
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
and
respectfully
request
your
approval.
Oh
I'm
sorry
one!
I
could
just
go
over
the
floor
plan
really
fast,
just
to
show
you
so
the
floor
plan
that
was
supplied
with
the
alcohol
beverage
special
use.
This
is
the
outdoor
area
you're
going
to
see.
This
is
reminiscent
of
most
restaurants,
because
that's
what
this
is:
there's
a
small
bar
top
area,
but
for
all
intents
and
purposes
this
is
a
restaurant.
T
It's
stated
as
that.
Through
this
special
use,
so
food
consumption
will
always
be
available
during
alcohol
consumption
and,
just
briefly,
to
show
you
some
of
the
proposed
elevations
of
the
structure
so
again,
keeping
mainly
that
area
that
the
building
and
the
outdoor
patio
already
is
in
and
updating
the
structure
to
make
it.
This
project's
come
to
life,
so
anyways,
I'm
here
for
any
questions.
K
Is
there
gonna
be
any
outdoor
music
outdoor
amplified?
I
don't.
T
Know
I
took
it
from
you,
we
could
propose.
I
know
any
state
of
the
hours
operation
are
consistent
with
chapter
14
and
I
think
what
we
can
do
is
we
could
we
could
propose
the
9
a.m,
to
9
p.m,
sunday
through
thursday,
and
then
the
9
a.m
to
10
p.m,
friday
through
saturday,
which
typically
would
take
care
of
any
kind
of
outdoor
amplified
sound,
because
the
establishment
would
be
closed.
T
E
K
Sworn
in
my
name
is
rich
lovinger,
I'm
the
owner
of
4016
henderson
boulevard
boulevard,
which
is
right
next
door
to
where
the
site
is.
I
actually
walked.
H
The
parking
today
there
is
not
25
parking
spots,
there's.
K
M
H
K
S
H
I
K
H
No
it's
further
down
and
I'm
not
sure
we
came
up
with
25,
but
there's
not
25
there
now
and
that's
not
even
21..
So
it's.
H
Going
to
say
this
again
more
than
11
spark
spots
there
I
would
like.
Maybe
some
council
members
live
around
there,
maybe
come
walk
there
and
you'll
see
what
I'm
talking
about.
T
Thank
you
just
be
clear
and
staff
can
confirm.
This
is
the
proposed
plan
and
we
are
providing
21
parking
spaces.
We
cannot
deviate
from,
as
you
know,
with
a
pd-
and
I
think
tyler
alluded
to
some
of
that
before
with
substantial
change
criteria,
once
you
have
a
approved
pd,
that's
what
you
must
develop
too.
So
the
setbacks
are
laid
out
here,
as
well
as
the
parking,
the
ingress,
the
egress
points,
and
this
is
21
place,
21
spaces.
I
believe
the
gentleman
is
correct.
T
There's
probably
I
think,
per
the
survey
18
spaces
that
are
currently
on
site.
But
again
what
we're
proposing
is
not
the
existing.
What
we're
proposing
through
this
rezoning
is
what
you
see
right
here.
This
is
what
we
would
have
to
develop
too
we'd
be
adding
additional
vua
areas
to
properly
keep
vehicles
and
pedestrians
from
riding
on
the
streets
or
riding
in
that
area
that
the
drive
through
now
and
we're
removing
the
drive-through,
which
I
think
from
a
transportation
standpoint,
would
be
an
increase
in
intensity.
T
E
J
Are
you
counting
three
parallel
parking
spaces
next
to
the
building?
Okay,
because
I
think
that's
a
little
unclear
in
this
drawing
so
I
I
was
trying
to
count
and
that's
the
only
way
I
can
come
to
it
because
you're
taking
the
drive
through.
T
K
T
Is
right
because
when
we
did
the
plans-
and
we
went
through
the
reviews,
we
were
trying
to
at
first
just
kind
of
keeping
it
minimal
and
keeping
that
existing
drive-thru,
which
again
from
the
existing
site-
and
I
could
understand
the
neighbors
concerns-
I
mean-
there's
no
direction
for
anybody
back
here
and
there's
a
drive-through
on
top
of
that.
What
we're
providing
is
more
direction
more
safety,
but
yes,
those
three
spaces
are
located
there.
The
ada
space
is
there
there's
additional
diagonal
spaces
here
and
then
the
compact
space
spaces
on
this
side.
J
J
It
of
course,
so
I
would
recommend
that,
because
that
has
been
effective
in
seminole
heights,
if
people,
if
it's
a
nice
big
sign,
it's
professional,
it's
attached
to
your
structure,
your
walls,
your
everything.
T
J
J
Yes,
I
I
think
that
that
that
would
help
and
working
with
the
neighbor
on
this.
K
You
know
if
you
don't,
if
you
don't
park
on
the
lot,
because
they
have
signs
throughout
that
say,
active
towing
throughout
the
neighborhood
and
they
actively
tow
and
they're
very
good
and
very
quick
at
towing
to
the
point
that
I'm
scared
to
go
there
sometimes
there's
also
ella's
and
ella's
is
next
to
a
value
pawn
and
they
have
a
sign,
they're,
saying
ella's
park
at
the
valley,
pond
ella's
parking
after
six
or
after
whenever
the
pawn
shop
closes.
If
there's
any
overflow.
K
So
there's
you
know,
the
gentleman
has
his
business
assuming
he
has
x
amount
of
spaces
assuming
he
has
clients,
assuming
if
a
client
needs
to
visit
and
they
are
abusing
the
neighbors,
the
taco
place
his
parking
he's
going
to
lose
business.
It's
going
to
it's
going
to
affect
him
financially
and
you
know
the
very
least
should
be
clear
signs
saying
you
know
you
will
be
towed
or
the
gentleman
could
also
contact
a
towing
company
which
he
shouldn't
have
to.
I
mean
he's
like
he's
a
good
neighbor.
He
should
be.
K
Contact
a
towing
company
they'll,
bring
a
sign,
and
you
know
he'll
just
start
showing
people
left
and
right,
but
I
would
ask
please-
and
I
know
you
I
mean
you're-
you
know
you-
you
know
how
this
works,
but
to
be
respectful
of
the
gentleman's
parking
next
door.
K
I
understand
that
you're,
adding
you're
moving
the
drive
through
adding
those
three
parallel
spaces,
so
there's
the
total
number
as
you're,
showing
plus
bicycle
parking
and
whatnot,
but
you
know
he's,
got
a
business
to
run
and
he's
not
gonna
be
losing
money
because
of
this,
it's
just
wrong.
Thank
you,
sir.
E
Would
you
please
take
15
first
first.
J
E
F
N
Mr
chairman,
ab2-22
one
has
been
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
ordinance
approving
a
special
use,
permit
institute
for
alcoholic
beverage
sales,
small
venue,
consumption
of
premises
only
and
making
lawful
the
sale
of
beverages,
regardless
of
alcohol
content,
beer,
wine
and
liquor
on
that
certain
block,
plot
or
track
of
land
located
at
4004
henderson
boulevard,
10th
florida
is
mostly
described
in
section
2,
providing
all
ordinances
or
parts
of
the
original
conflicts
are
repealed
by
effective
date.
Second,.
L
F
H
H
My
bad,
you
know,
I
don't
know
what
date
that
is,
it's
gonna
be
off
premises.
I
can
get
you
all
the
date
I
just
saw.
It
come
an
email
to
us.
K
Because
it's
we
meet
next
thursday.
I
I
want
to
wish
our
former
mayor
dick
greco,
happy
birthday.
There
you
go,
which
is
wednesday
and
he
will
be
89
years
old
this
year.
E
E
Thank
you
very
much,
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
present
accommodation,
recognizing
childhood
cancer
awareness
month
and
them,
and
the
amazing
children
who
are
impacted
by
disease
28
children
a
day
or
about
10
and
a
half
thousand
children
will
be
diagnosed
with
cancer
this
year.
It
remains
the
leading
cause
of
death
by
disease
for
american
children
under
the
age
of
15.
Survivors
face
many
physical,
emotional
and
cognitive
changes.
E
My
office,
my
legislative
aide,
knows
the
challenges
of
childhood
cancers
all
too
well,
but
those
who
fight
the
disease
and
their
families
are
not
without
hope,
because
of
advance.
In
recent
decades,
eighty-five
percent
of
children
with
cancer
now
survive
five
years
or
more
compared
to
50
years
ago,
with
it
less
than
60
percent.
Just
like
little
remy.
E
He
is
alive
because
amazing
funded
research
by
doctors
and
scientists
that
saved
his
life
and
not
only
our
children
living
together,
but
they
will
also
have
support
and
a
network
of
incredible
health
care
professionals,
community
organizations
to
support
them.
We
recognize
the
organizations
that
have
done
a
great
work
to
support
these
families
like
the
children's
cancer
center,
one
voice
foundation,
finn's
fighters,
the
kids
connection
and
leukemia
lymphoma
society.
This
accommodation
will
be
presented
off-site
at
a
later.