►
From YouTube: TCC PM 3/9/23
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
B
C
A
F
F
G
First
of
all,
I'd
like
to
thank
Mr
chairman
I'd,
like
to
thank
you
and
the
members
of
the
council
for
honoring
our
auditorical
contestants
this
year.
The
American
Legion
oratorical
contest
is
a
contest
on
the
U.S
Constitution,
which
the
legion
has
been
running
for
the
past
75
years
and
that
the
contestants
have
to
memorize
five
speeches.
It's
given
without
notes
off
the
top
of
their
head
on
different
topics,
there's
an
eight
to
ten
minute
speech,
which
we
call
the
prepared
corporation,
which
is
on
the
topic
of
their
choice.
G
And
then
there
were
four
assigned
topics
which
were
assigned
by
the
American
Legion
on
different
parts
of
the
Constitution.
This
year.
The
four
assigned
topics
were
the
sixth
amendment,
the
Eighth
Amendment,
the
Tenth
Amendment
and
the
14th
Amendment,
and
we're
very
honored
that
you
you're
honoring
our
folks.
This
year
we
only
have
two
contestants
from
our
post
and
they're
the
only
contestants
in
the
county
this
year,
so
our
our
contestant
went
all
the
way
straight
to
the
state
finals
from
this.
So
with
this
I'd
like
to
turn
it
back
to
Mr,
councilman
Miranda
stay.
F
Right
here,
Mr
Smith
I'd
like
to
also
thank
the
commander
of
post
five
J.R
Scoggins
for
his
diligent
work
and
bringing
the
post
to
where
it
is
today,
and
we
have
two
consensus
with
us.
The
winner
of
this
area
that
finished
first
I
want
to
introduce
her
first,
because
this
has
a
story
and
the
one
that
finished
second
has
another
story,
because
she
became
the
first
one
sometime
after
that,
because
the
first
one
could
make
it
to
the
finals
am
I
correct.
That's
what
he
told
me
anyway,
all
right!
So
it's
an
honor.
F
F
They
took
it
out
for
I,
don't
know
how
many
years
I
don't
know
if
it's
back
or
not
I
haven't
checked,
but
these
students
of
school
age
and
these
young
people
that
do
this
is
because
they
love
the
country
and
they
love
to
make
Florida
and
Tampa,
and
the
United
States
of
America
a
better
place
to
live
so
Isabel
bad
core.
Will
you
please
come
up?
F
How
do
you
like
that?
I
was
never
even
a
double
winner
and
demonstrate
your
king
interest
and
appreciation
for
the
principles
and
values
set
forth
in
the
Constitution
of
the
United
States
of
America,
and
your
awareness
of
the
responsibility
incumbent
on
each
citizen
to
exercise
the
proper
rights
and
with
this
I'm,
so
honored
on
behalf
of
Tampa
City
Council,
chairman
citro,
Mr
Vieira
miss
her
attack
and
Mr
Goods.
F
I
No
right
there
right
next
to
councilman,
councilman
Viera.
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr
chair,
no
good
to
see
you
and
good
to
see
my
friends
here
tonight
and
and
thank
you,
councilman
Miranda.
You
always
take
such
a
wonderful
interest
in
this
in
this
contest,
and
it's
it's
great.
It's
great
to
see
the
American
Legion
do
what
the
American
Legion
does,
especially
with
our
young
people.
I
always
say
that
our
young
people
really
have
got
to
know
the
greatness
of
our
great
country.
I
I
We
hear
a
lot
about
what's
wrong
with
our
country
and
we
got
to
hear
that
stuff
so
that
we
can
make
it
right,
but
I
always
say,
like
a
former
president,
said
that
what's
wrong
with
America
can
be
fixed
and
can
be
healed
by
what's
right
with
America
and
the
things
that
you
studied
and
that
you
were
examined
on
Etc
really
form
the
basis
of
of
so
much
that's
right
about
our
great
country.
So
just
wanted
to
salute
you
for
that,
and
thank
you.
Councilwoman.
A
J
I
just
want
to
thank
the
American
Legion
for
doing
this.
I'm
I
have
to
say
I'm
a
little
disappointed
that
post
111
didn't
have
anybody.
That's
that's
our
Legion,
but
but
congratulations
to
you
and
my
husband
is
a
former
speech
professor
and
doing
these
types
of
speeches
and
and
working
with
folks
to
to
be
able
to
present
speeches.
We'll
we'll
send
you
so
far
in
life
that
being
able
to
get
up
and
talk
in
front
of
people
being
able
to
to
remember
a
speech.
J
Remember
points
you
want
to
share.
This
will
take
you
so
very
far.
You
have
no
idea
right
now
what
a
great
skill
this
is
and
what
a
great
honor
it
is
to
be
to
win
this
contest.
So
congratulations
and
best
of
luck
on
future
endeavors
which
I
promise
you
if
this
will
come
in
handy
for.
K
G
It's
a
five-tiered
event:
okay,
so
we're
at
the
post
level
we're
number
one
then
there's
a
district,
the
district's
basically
Hillsborough
County
and
we
have
what's
called
an
area
level,
that's
Hillsborough,
hasko
and
Pinellas,
and
then
the
next
is
the
state
level,
the
department
we
call
it,
and
then
the
national
One
National
contest
is
going
to
go
on
the
next
one.
Well,.
K
A
Councilman
Goods
goods
and
where
everything
is
taught
mouth
to
ear,
I,
don't
think
it's
written
down.
I
congratulate
you
on
remembering
your
speeches.
Well,
what's
more
important
is
anyone
could
recite
words,
you've
learned
what
those
words
mean
and
what
they
mean
to
not
only
our
country,
but
what
they
mean
to
you
and
your
generation
and
I.
Thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
learn
the
significance
of
those
words
and
when
they
were
written
by
our
forefathers.
They
still
stand
true
today.
Thank
you.
Congratulations
and
Godspeed.
On
the
next
event,.
F
The
presentation
for
the
silver
Medal
winner
is
Emily
Peak.
However,
there's
a
story
behind
this.
What
happened
and
I
think
Frank
Smith
and
myself
will
talk
about
it,
and
you
can
listen
to
this
because
it
is
a
little
heartwarming.
It's
a
great
pleasure
to
present
Emily
Peak,
the
city
council
of
Tampa
Florida
presents
to
you.
G
F
F
The
youngest
one
with
competitions
so
sometimes
just
trying-
and
you
did
your
best
and
more
than
likely
you're
going
to
be
much
better
than
me.
You
are
now
but
I'm,
just
letting
you
know
that
these
things
are
very
all
of
us
in
this
in
this
country
deserve
individuals
like
yourself
in
the
neighborhood.
Both
of
you
are
outstanding.
Citizens
and
I
can
tell
just
by
your
smile
in
your
face
that
you're
going
to
be
something
real
soon,
real
quick.
I
Just
again
to
salute
you
for
the
hard
work
that
you
put
in.
It
takes
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
spirit
to
get
up
there
and
speak
in
front
of
people
and
whatnot,
whether
they're
young
age
or
middle
age,
or
whatever,
maybe
so
so
well
done.
God
bless
you.
J
K
C
Yes,
Mr
chairman,
thank
you
very
much
good
evening.
Council
Martin
Shelby
city
council
attorney.
First
of
all,
let
me
Begin
by
saying
that
if
you
have
had
any
ex
parte
Communications
with
anybody
with
reference
to
tonight's
hearings
that
before
the
hearing
you
disclose,
with
whom
that
communication
occurred
and
the
sum
and
substance
of
that
communication,
if
you
could
have
a
motion
now
to
receive
and
file
the
written
Communications
which
have
been
made
available
to
the
public.
N
Apologize
to
my
colleagues
in
the
public
that
I'm
late
tonight,
but
I
did
want
to
say
one
thing
for
whoever
on
staff
is
keeping
track
of
when
I'm
a
few
minutes
late
of
the
meetings.
Apparently,
sixty
percent
of
the
people
in
Tampa
don't
care,
so
you
wasted
your
time.
Thank
you.
I
It's
just
for
for
my
leaving
early.
Thank
you
very
much.
No
just
to
make
it
make
everybody
aware
I
will
be
leaving.
My
son
has
a
play
this
evening
that
I
that
I
have
to
attend
in
about
45
minutes,
so
my
sincere
apologies
I
sent
to
memo
for
that.
Thank
you.
I
O
Great,
the
first
cleanup
is
item
number
two
t-a-cpa
2229.
The
applicant
is
requesting
the
continuance
to
be
heard
on
April
13
2023
at
501
pm
I.
Believe
the
applicant
is
here
and
able
to
comment
on
the
continuance
if
needed.
P
A
No,
that's
that's
why
that's
where
I'm
I'm
going
to
go
with
this
Mr?
Can
you
come
back
up
to
the
podium
Mrs
barge?
You
were
speaking
to
agenda
item
number
two
was
the
first
one
that
was
asking
for
the
continuance,
correct,
okay
and
agenda
item
number
two
and
eleven
we're
going
to
be
heard
together
or
were
they
separate?
What
have
you
heard
chef.
A
Two
first
exactly
thank
you
very
much
file
number
t.
A
CPA
22-29
has
been
asked
to
be
continued
until
April
13th
2023..
Is
there
anyone
in
Chambers
their
wishes
to
speak
to
the
continuance?
Only
continuance
only
we
have
a
motion
made
by
councilman
Vieira
seconded
by
councilman
Carlson
to
continue
file
number
ta,
CPA
22-29
to
April
13th,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye.
Any
opposed
motion.
O
Any
part
of
development
coordination
item
number
11
is
Rez
2315..
The
applicant
is
requesting
new
continuance
to
April
13
2023
at
501
pm
and
again.
The
applicant
is
here
to
speak
on
the
continuance
if
needed,.
P
A
O
C
C
A
O
Okay
item
number:
eight
is
any
Barn
development
coordination
item
number
eight
is
Rez
2308.
The
applicant
is
requesting.
This
item
be
heard
directly
after
item
number.
One
tonight
I
believe
the
African
is
here
if
needed,
to
speak
on
that
item.
O
C
Q
R
A
C
And
Mr
chairman
before
I
before
the
staff
begins
in
the
presentation,
is
made
just
a
reminder
that
item
number
one
is
like
item
number
three,
not
quasi-judicial.
They
are
legislative
matters.
Thank
you.
C
H
Can
you
see
that
okay,
it's
located
at
808,
North,
Armenia,
Avenue
and
2402
West
State
Street.
H
H
H
This
is
an
aerial
of
the
subject
site
in
the
surrounding
area.
You
can
see
the
site
outlined
here
and
it's
highlighted
in
yellow
and
it's
at
the
southwest
corner
of
North
Armenia
Avenue
and
West
State
Street
on
the
Eastern
portion
of
West
Armenia
Avenue.
The
development
pattern
is
a
mix
of
residential
and
Commercial
uses
into
the
west
of
North.
Armenia
Avenue
is
predominantly
seeing
residential
uses.
H
H
H
H
Here
are
the
potential
impacts
for
the
future
land
use
designation.
Currently,
under
the
R20
designation,
the
site
can
be
considered
for
five
dwelling
units
or
just
over
5
000
square
feet
of
non-residential
uses.
H
If
the
subject
site
meets
locational
criteria
on
the
potential,
it
could
go
up
to
six
units
and
slightly
over
11
000
square
feet
of
residential
or
non-residential
uses,
the
site
could
use
far
to
develop
either
residential
or
non-residential
uses,
and
the
request
would
allow
neighborhoods
serving
commercial
uses
by
right
without
requiring
the
site
to
meet
locational
criteria
and
in
Additionally
the
request
would
introduce
the
consideration
of
limited
commercial
General
Uses
on
the
site.
H
The
Planning
Commission
found
it
consistent
with
multiple
aspects
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
The
request
would
promote
a
range
of
uses
and
mixed-use
development
patterns
in
the
city's
Urban
Villages.
It
would
promote
compatible
development
and
Redevelopment
to
sustain
Naval
neighborhoods
and
ensure
the
social
and
economic
health
of
the
city,
and
it
would
promote
densities
and
a
mixture
of
uses
that
support
walking
in
transit,
near
employment
concentrations,
residential
services
and
amenities,
and
the
request
would
also
ensure
that
an
additional
supply
of
housing
is
available
to
meet
the
needs
of
Tampa's,
present
and
future
populations.
H
S
Good
evening
Mr
chair
members
of
council,
my
name
is
Mark
Bentley
before
I
proceed.
Do
okay.
Do
we
need
to
get
sworn
in
on
these
legislative
matters?
Okay,
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
I'm
here
this
evening,
representing
Rabbi,
Mendy
dubrowski
and
his
non-profit
organization,
who
is
seeking
to
change
to
allow
neighborhood
mixed
use,
designation
of
the
subject
property.
As
you
heard,
the
proposed
amendments
been
determined
to
be
compatible
and
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies.
S
At
the
city's
comprehensive
plan,
it's
received
a
broad
spectrum
of
support,
specifically
your
long-range
planning
staff,
the
staff
of
the
Planning
Commission,
unanimous
recommendation
from
the
from
the
Planning
Commission,
as
well
as
Community
Support.
It's
my
understanding.
Some
of
the
supporters
are
here
in
attendance
and
tend
to
address
Council
this
evening.
S
Also,
letters
of
support
have
been
submitted
to
council
and
those
are
on
the
record
at
this
point
in
time.
What
I'd
like
to
do
is
turn
the
presentation
over
to
Mr
Ryan
manasse,
our
planner
and
then
after
Ryan.
The
rabbi
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
address
Council
and
talk
a
little
bit
about
his
vision
for
the
project.
Thank
you.
S
T
Good
evening
city
council,
Ryan
manasse
with
Johnson
Pope,
401
East,
Jackson,
Street
Suite
3100.
Thank
you
for
having
me
tonight
and
thank
you
for
staff
for
their
presentation
on
this
plan.
Amendment
request
again
we're
here
requesting
an
amendment
from
the
the
existing
residential
20
to
the
proposed
neighborhood
mixed-use
24
category
for
the
property
located
at
808
North,
Armenia
Avenue
and
2402
West
State
Street.
Again,
the
site
is
around
0.27
Acres
or
11
325
square
feet,
and
it's
currently
zoned
as
a
planned
development
for
a
place.
T
T
Just
a
little
history
on
the
neighborhood
mix
used
24
category
It's
relatively
new
category
as
far
as
the
plan,
and
and
seeing
it
before
you.
But
it's
intended
for
properties
located
in
Urban
Village
such
as
the
subject
site
this
category
was
created
in
order
to
allow
for
limited
neighborhood
mixed
uses
to
be
located
within
these
neighborhood
residential
neighborhoods.
T
Now
this
slide
shows
the
subject
area
which
is
outlined
in
yellow
and
the
blue
shaded
area
signifies
commercial
or
institutional
uses,
along
with
large
residential
multi-family
development,
which
is
immediately
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site.
Our
client
wishes
to
expand
their
already
approved
PD
and
add
a
daycare
use
in
order
to
accommodate
the
community
needs
to
provide
appropriate
residential
support,
uses.
T
Currently
they
buddy
about
each
other
in
existence.
Our
request
with
the
residential
support,
uses
further
supports
a
transition
to
the
rm16
zoning
District,
which
is
again
to
that
West
also
I'd
like
to
point
out
that
Armenia
Avenue
is
an
arterial
roadway
and
a
Transit
emphasis
Corridor
the
comprehend.
The
comprehensive
plan
identifies
our
media
Avenue
as
a
corridor
suitable
for
redevelopment,
which
is
in
line
with
our
request.
T
Now,
in
this
Slide,
the
blue
shaded
area
signify
existing
public
quasi-public
and
institutional
land
uses
the
Stars
identify
a
place
of
religious
assembly
use
which
is
in
line
with
our
proposed
use.
You
can
see
this
type
of
use
is
further
rooted
to
the
West
well
into
the
residential
neighborhood.
Our
request
is
adjacent
again
to
that
arterial
roadway,
which
supports
this
type
of
future
land
use
request
and
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
existing
development
along
Armenia
Avenue.
T
Now
this
slide
just
showed
you
a
mix
of
zoning
districts
within
an
immediate
area.
The
area
outlined
in
yellow
is
the
subject
site
and
what
I'm
trying
to
demonstrate
here
is
that
there
are
uses
allowed
in
a
neighborhood,
mixed-use
24
category
that
canned
and
may
already
exist
in
the
surrounding
zoning
districts.
This
request
further
supports
the
type
of
residential
support
uses.
We
are
proposing
and
now
I'd
like
to
introduce
Rabbi
Mendy
he's
here
to
briefly
discuss
his
vision
and
then
I'll
come
back
up
and
conclude
my
presentation.
Thank
you.
S
A
A
W
C
C
Should
that
move
forward,
then
item
number
eight
would
then
be
the
rezoning.
There
are
two
separate
issues
and
that
you
should
keep
that
in
mind.
Please
that.
N
Just
just
for
the
for
transparency,
I
had
Rabbi
Mendy
speak
at
the
invocation
this
morning.
I
I
didn't
know
that
he
had
an
item
coming
up
tonight
in
my
legislative
aide
set.
That
up
is
that
that's
a
conflict
all
stepped
out,
but
I
had
no
conversations
with
them
in
any
way
about
this
project.
C
Well,
thank
you
for
sharing
that,
for
the
purposes
of
the
record,
let
me
ask
you
this
again
and
a
reminder.
Council
specifically,
we've
talked
about
this
in
the
past.
What
you
have
before
you
is
a
land
use
issue
and
who
is
requesting
it
frankly
is
not
relevant
to
the
matter.
You
have
to
look
at
the
parameters
and
the
the
criteria
in
order
for
which
you
to
base
your
decision.
C
That
being
the
case
and
the
fact
that
Rabbi
Mendy,
my
understanding
did
appear
this
morning,
based
on
what
you
said
and
may
be
known
to
you
is
there
anybody
who
believes
that
that
relationship
would
be
able
to
keep
you
from
being
fair
and
impartial?
If
there
is
anybody
who
would
have
trouble
with
that
and
not
able
to
be
fair
and
impartial
and
base
your
decision
solely
on
the
record,
if
you
would
just
speak
now,
otherwise,
then
we'll
take
that
as
everybody
is
comfortable
with
that,
is
there
anybody
who
wishes
to
say
anything?
C
C
Mr
chairman,
there
is
a
speaker
waiver
form,
I
see,
I
will
see,
I
see
six
names
on
them.
If
you
are
present,
do
please
acknowledge
that
Debbie
Zimmerman?
Thank
you.
Adrian
Laramie
did
I
say
that
correctly,
okay,
thank
you!
Jerome,
Arabic,
Adcock!
Okay,
thank
you,
Janice
Katz!
C
X
This
is
way
above
my
pay
grade
sort
of
like
David
and
Goliath,
but
I'm
here
to
try
and
convince
you
that
the
ordinance
amending
the
2040
Tampa
comprehensive
plan
at
808,
North,
Armenia
and
2402
West
State
Street
from
Resident
R20
to
Neighborhood,
use
and
mu-24
is
detrimental
to
the
Army
Gardens
Community.
It's
going
to
be
a
detriment.
X
C
I'm,
sorry,
if
we
can
thank
you
Miss
Sanchez,
with
regard
to
the
mass
and
scale
and
the
size
of
the
property,
that
would
be
something
that
would
be
with
regard
to
the
zoning.
This
would
be
the
future
land
use
if
you
could
focus
perhaps
on
on
the
the
changes
as
to
what
should
be
there
or
excuse
me
as
to
what
is
there
versus
what
they're
asking
for.
C
D
Kate
Wells
legal
department,
just
very
generally,
with
a
comprehensive
plan.
Amendment
council
is
looking
at
the
differences
in
uses
that
would
be
permitted
by
the
existing
future
land
use,
designation
and
the
proposed
land
use.
Designation,
I
think
I'm
going
to
wait
until
Miss
Sanchez
can
hear
since
I'm
trying
to
explain
this
for
her
benefit
as
well.
D
So
the
purpose
I'll
start
again.
The
purpose
of
looking
at
these
map
amendments
is
to
consider
council's
role
is
to
consider
the
uses
and
the
density
or
intensity
Allowed
by
the
current
land
use
designation
versus
what
is
being
proposed.
So
we
always
counsel
city
council
to
consider
the
maximum
development
potential
proposed
by,
in
this
case
the
NMU
24
designation.
What
is
the
far
of
that
designation
versus
the
current
far?
D
What
are
the
uses
that
would
be
permitted
under
the
NMU
24
that
may
not
currently
be
permitted
and
then
consider
that
maximum
development
potential
and
those
uses
in
comparison
to
the
existing
neighborhood
and
the
compatibility.
So
a
lot
of
those
items
were
addressed
in
the
planning
commission's
Report
with
respect
to
the
potential
development
and
the
uses.
D
So
at
this
stage,
if
members
of
the
public
wish
to
address
Council,
we
asked
them
to
focus
on
those
more
conceptual
discussions
that
occur
with
a
map
Amendment
versus
what
could
be
specifically
developed
here
under
the
rezoning
since
the
rezoning
application
has
not
yet
been
opened.
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
helpful.
Okay,.
J
And
I
just
want
to
State
for
the
record.
This
is
why
we
as
a
council
have
talked
over
and
over
again
about
splitting
the
comprehensive
plans
and
the
rezonings,
because
the
public
has
a
difficult
time,
understanding
them
and
it
it
it
contain
it
just
it.
It
doesn't
allow
us
to
look
at
the
future
land
use
as
future
land
use,
because
we
know
we
have
a
rezoning
coming
behind
it.
So
I'm
going
to
ask
again
for
staff
to
consider
splitting
these
up,
so
we're
not
hearing
them
on
the
same
night.
A
X
X
This
text
Amendment
will
give
the
application
the
applicant
the
ability
to
increase
their
square
footage
from
566
62
square
feet
of
non-residential
uses
two
eleven
thousand
three
hundred
and
twenty-five
square
feet
of
non-residential
uses
or
residential
uses.
That's
a
very,
very
important
line
there,
because
what
it
does
is
it
attracts
more
people
to
come
into
to
our
neighborhood.
X
X
If
this
amendment
passes,
it
will
set
a
precedent
to
be
used
on
the
west
side
of
Armenia.
It
can
only
attract
irresponsible
growth,
the
applicant
for
the
comp
changes
and
I
don't
know
if
I
can
say
this
appears
to
have
a
loving
and
caring
congregation
with
strong
social
groups
of
all
ages
and
an
educational
program.
It
appears
to
be
a
loving
and
caring
Community.
X
L
X
C
X
To
this
they
have
continually
been
using
please
notice,
on
the
rest,
bread,
which
is
to
the
west
of
Armenia.
That's
where
the
community
commercial
is
located.
There
are
no
at
my
news
on
the
there
are
no
mnus
on
the
on
the
east
side.
You
can
see
the
west
side
of
Armenia
most
of
the
community.
Commercial
is
on
the
right
side,
so
I
wanted
to
bring
that
to
your
attention.
X
I
took
you
to
the
second
one
which
says
Urban
Villages
contain
most
of
the
following
uses
would
typically
make
up
what
is
considered
traditional
unlivable
community,
single
and
family
multi-family,
residential
neighborhoods
serving
commercial
schools
parks
and
Central
valleys,
mass
transit
and
safe
walkable
Pathways
that
connect
people
to
all
these
villages.
These
do
not
exist
in
Armory
Gardens.
We
have
no
sidewalks
ensure
that
development
project
in
Urban
Village
are
designed
for
pedestrian
traffic
and
content
to
support
and
city-wide
Transit
again,
there
are
no
no
sidewalks.
X
I
ask
you
again:
I'm
sorry
I
had
to
limit
my
my
presentation
to
things
that
that
I
could
and
could
not
say,
but
the
bottom
line
is
this:
jeopardizes
our
community
tremendously
and
I
also
said
we
would
love
to
welcome
Rabbi,
dubrowski
and
all
of
his
all
of
his
congregation,
but
there's
still
too
many
things
that
have
been
unanswered.
Thank
you.
Q
You
know
any
anybody
get
hurt
in
this
situation,
meaning
you
had
mentioned
that
they
had
not
reached
out
to
you
and
talked
to
you
before
we
proceed.
Would
the
petitioner
consider
maybe
continuing
this
to
communicate
better
again,
a
denial
is
very
expensive.
It's
very
takes
a
lot
of
time,
whatever
I
just
you
know
before
we
head
that
route.
If
we
already
had
that
route,
I
don't
know
if
Federal
Communications
needs
to
be
had
so
just.
X
What
I
can't
say
to
you
is,
for
example,
because
of
the
heavy
traffic
in
our
neighborhood
and
the
speed
and
the
speeding
to
our
neighbors.
We
have
children
who've
been
hit,
we
have
bicyclists
have
been
killed,
it
all
has
to
do
with
over
a
more
and
more
traffic
that
comes
into
the
neighborhood.
The
comprehensive
plan
does
not
address
that.
Like
I
said.
If
we
live
by
the
rose,
comprehensive
plan
all
would
be
roses.
That's
not
the
reality
of
the
neighborhoods
today.
Y
Good
evening
my
name
is
Stephanie.
Poynter
I
do
not
live
close
to
this
property,
but
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
we
have
asked
for
these
comp
plan
amendments
to
be
unpaired
with
the
rezonings
and
I
think.
This
has
been
a
very
good
example
as
to
why
I
think
that
we
really
need
to
reconsider.
This
is
a
good
time
for
the
council
to
reconsider
this
whole
process
of
comp
plan
changes.
Y
We
employ
some
very,
very
smart
folks
in
this
city
who
do
land
use
and
planning
for
this
city.
We
have
a
future
land
use
map.
Why
is
it
that
people
continue
to
purchase
property
and
then
they
want
to
do
something
that
they're
not
allowed
to
do
at
that
property?
I,
just
I,
don't
understand
the
concept.
There
are
many
many
other
places
in
the
state
in
the
country
where,
if
you
buy
a
piece
of
land,
that's
what
you
can
do
with
it
when
you
buy
it
not
later
on.
Why
are
we
paying
Stephen
Benson?
Y
Why
are
we
paying
Melissa
and
oh
I'm,
forgetting
somebody,
but
why
are
we
paying
these
people,
thousands
of
dollars
to
write
ourselves,
a
comprehensive
plan?
A
new
one
when
every
time
we
turn
around
every
Tom,
Dick
and
Harry
can
can
come
in
here
and
say:
oh
I,
don't
like
what
you
said:
I
can
do
with
this
property.
Y
A
S
S
S
Lawyers
up
here,
so
I
thought
it
was
a
little
bit
disingenuous
that
we
didn't
reach
out
and
I
wanted
the
rabbi
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
that
that
it
would
be
futile
actually
to
talk
this
organization
anymore,
but
I
want
to
emphasize
with
the
council
before
I
turn
over.
The
rabbi
is
here
again
everybody
who
weighed
in
on
this.
S
Z
Mandy
dubrowski
do
my
title:
you
have
the
bio
from
this
morning
number
one
I
think
it's
important
to
highlight
the
fact
that
this
petition
is
being
submitted
with
the
goal
of
serving
that
community,
whether
they
recognize
that
or
not,
and
that's
what
NMU
is
designed
to
do
and
the
organization.
That's
the
application
is
an
organization
built
around
that
expressed
purpose,
not
in
name
only
it's
an
organization,
that's
proven,
with
a
proven
track
record
over
the
last
14
and
a
half
years
that
we
serve
as
the
people
in
our
communities,
and
this
is
no
different.
Z
Z
I
have
the
recorded
response.
Then
she
called
me
back
and
said
some
time
opened
up
and
I
met
with
her
immediately.
I
did
not
get
the
consensus
from
her
that
she
was
willing
to
understand
why
we
had
made
changes
which
were
directly
connected
with
life,
safety
and
other
issues
which
you
will
see
when
we
make
our
second
presentation.
Z
That
was
of
no
interest
to
her.
What
the
changes
were,
which
I
think
would
provide
a
lot
of
understanding
to
whether
this
change
is
actually
related
to
welcoming
in
significantly
more
people,
or
it
is
a
change
that
was
made
for
practical
considerations,
because
the
first
design
didn't
work
and
to
address
the
previous
concern
why
people
buy
properties
with
the
intention
of
then
going
and
changing
the
land
use.
Z
That
is
not
the
case
here,
and
the
biggest
proof
of
that
is
that
when
this
parcel
was
purchased
more
than
five
years
ago
and
a
rezoning
was
had
at
that
time,
there
was
no
request
to
change
any
planned
commission
whatsoever.
Our
goal
was
to
operate
within
that
guideline.
We
went
through
the
rezoning
process.
We
worked
with
City
staff
to
try
and
facilitate
that
process.
We
had
major
life
safety
issues
and
challenges
trying
to
stay
within
that
guideline.
Z
That
is
what
precipitated
us
having
these
conversations
with
staff
and
precipitated
us
going
down
this
double
change,
so
it
was
not
Our
intention
to
upend
the
the
map,
we're
not
looking
to
dramatically
change
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
In
fact,
as
I
expressed
to
Miss
Sanchez
I
look
forward
to
working
with
her,
because
I
look
forward
to
being
a
resident
in
Armory
Gardens
I'm,
currently
exploring
moving
my
family
to
the
immediate
area,
so
I
hope
that
that
context
helps
understand
that.
Well,
yes,
I
see,
there
is
a
larger
question
about
as
councilman
hertak
addressed.
Z
T
Ryan
manasse
for
the
record,
as
you
saw
from
your
professional
planning
staff,
the
density
would
be
I
think
it
was
one
more
dwelling
unit.
That's
what's
currently
existing.
It
does
not
set
precedent.
As
you
know,
each
case
and
property
stands
on
its
own
merits.
T
As
far
as
there
was
mention
of
cc35
this
property,
our
request
is
for
NMU
24
neighborhood
mixed
use
category.
There
are
sidewalks
along
Armenia
Avenue
and
in
the
rezoning
that
subsequent
we
would
be
providing
new
sidewalks
on
State
Street
and
the
uses
that
are
allowed
in
the
NMU
24
category
already
approved
in
the
existing
PD.
So
with
that,
we
would
respectfully
request
your
approval.
Q
T
L
H
Q
N
AA
N
Is
there,
is
there
a
difference
in
height
that's
allowed
under
the
that
would
be
a
zoning
issue,
not
a
planet
issue
right.
It's
just
the
square
footage.
That's
allowed.
That's
the
only
difference.
N
J
H
J
Mr
Benson,
if
you
wouldn't
mind
explaining
the
difference,
yeah.
AB
The
r10
allows
R20
I,
know
I'm,
sorry,
the
R20,
that's
along
the
corridor.
It
does
allow
commercial,
but
only
if
it
meets
the
locational
criteria,
which
this
does
because
it's
on
Armenia.
That's
why
there
are
some
offices
like
in
converted
homes
along
that
search
of
Armenia,
but
the
map
reflects
the
residential
designation.
AB
So
in
the
proposed
language
category
it
does
expand
the
number
of
commercially
the
amount
of
commercial
uses
and
the
intensity
of
commercial
uses
that
can
occur
by
right
without
locational
criteria.
So
it's
very
similar,
but
there
are
additional
uses
commercial
that
could
occur
on
under
the
NMU
as
opposed
to
the
R20.
Okay.
AB
S
N
Mr
Vincent
sorry
can
I.
Ask
you
another
question:
does
anybody
have
the
the
plan
the
layout?
My
question
is:
there's
the
there's
the
part
that
is
adjacent
to
the
road,
but
then
there's
another
part
that
hooks
around
three
single-family
homes.
Is
there
any
kind
of
rule
that
prevents
that
it?
That
seems
like
an
unusual
configuration.
AA
N
Yeah,
is
it
unusual
that
that
I,
don't
is
that
four
homes
or
five
I
can't
tell,
but
but
it
hooks
around
that,
so
you
have
oh
right
here:
commercial
yeah,
the
brown
is
that
single
family
homes
yeah
so
is
that
is.
Is
that
unusual
I?
Don't
remember
seeing
one
that
we're
they're
kind
of
encapsulated
in
this
in
this
building
by.
AB
S
A
G
A
Q
I'd
really
hate
to
kill
this
whole
project
and
that's
what's
frustrating
is
they're
allowed,
so
much
that
the
square
footage
difference
is
what
concerns
me,
because
it's
more
than
double
what's
already
allowed
and
we
don't
know
what
the
what
the
new
project
is
going
to
be.
It
could
be
6
000
square
feet.
It
could
be
11
000
square
feet,
I
will
I,
will
read
it
since
just
to
read
it
and
see
where
it
goes
and
we'll
go
from
there.
F
What
Mr
Maniscalco
said
it
would
miss
hertak
said
is
different,
but
it's
the
same,
because
we
have
to
hear
something
that
we
don't
know
what
the
other
something's
going
to
be
and
it's
like
playing
pool
and
he
you're
playing
with
half
a
stick,
because
you
don't
know
where
the
other
half
of
the
stick
is
at
and
so
I
at
Mr
Manziel
was
right
on
tune
and
Miss
hartak
was
right
onto
him
because
of
the
perplexity
of
the
not
of
the
development
itself,
but
of
the
conceptual
idea
of
the
neighborhood
saying
what
coming
here
they
don't
know
and
and
the
plan
that
I
see
meet
all
the
qualifications.
F
However,
that
unknown
factor
could
cause
the
chilling
effect
of
what
Mr
Maniscalco
addressed
is
the
possibility
of
going
from
something
to
something
larger.
It
doesn't
meet
other
requirements
and
I'm
not
talking
specifically
that
way.
They
can't
say
I,
say
something
out
of
order,
I'm
not
talking
in
specific.
Does
it
meet
a
b
c
and
d
that
will
be
required?
F
K
K
Again
rather,
I
mean
I,
can't
Force
any,
but
I
I
think
maybe
another
conversation
like
we
had
to
to
with
the
community,
so
they'll
know
again
we're
in
a
tight
shell
here
and
I
I
again,
it's
up
to
you
and
your
Mr
Bentley,
but
I
wish
you
before.
We
can
make
a
voter
sentence
before
we
upset
two
parts
which
I
don't
want,
upset
and
I
wish.
K
We
can
reconsider
and
you
maybe
ask
for
a
continuous
and
you
talk
with
the
community,
so
they
don't
know
what's
coming,
give
them
an
idea
what
they,
what
your
vision
is.
That's
just
my
thought.
This
time,
I
don't
know
where
it
may
go,
but
right
now,
I
can
hear
by
the
tone
of
this
Council.
It's
a
tough
one.
A
A
F
F
L
W
N
C
Not
you
well,
your
hearing
is
open,
whatever
happens
now,
ultimately,
we're
going
to
we're
going
to
give
Mr
Bentley
the.
N
Other
thing,
the
other
thing
I
would
like
to
cuddle.
The
other
thing
I'd
like
to
add
for
the
record
is
that
we
just
like
with
anything
we
have
to
we're
proving
the
plan
change
and
we
can't,
if,
if
somebody's
putting,
if
somebody's
putting
in
a
store
and
they're
putting
in
a
a
high-end
retail
store
versus
that
has
low
traffic
versus
a
low
end
fast
food
store,
we
can't
we.
N
Z
I'd
like
to
address
this,
the
idea
of
the
continuance,
which
in
theory
is
perfectly
normal
and
acceptable,
I'm,
a
very
level-headed
guy,
most
of
the
time
and
I
think
my
reputation
precedes
me
as
somebody
that
seats
to
broker
peace
and
bring
people
together
quite
clearly,
but
I,
don't
believe
that
a
continuance
is
going
to
lead
to
any
dramatic
change
in
this
plan.
Z
Part
of
the
challenge
is
that-
and
this
is
not
by
my
doing-
is
that
these
two
items
are
seen
together
are
seen
together,
but
apart
so
you're
concern
about
making
the
change,
because
you
you
don't
understand
yet
why
we're
making
that
change.
Obviously
it
makes
you
hesitant
to
make
that
change,
which
I
completely
understand,
but
when
I
try
to
explain
that
to
some
of
the
representatives
here,
they
didn't
want
to
hear
it.
They
had
no
interest
in
seeing
the
plan
changes.
They
had
no
interest
in
seeing
the
design
changes.
Z
So
that's
what
leads
me
to
believe
that
I
understand
that
they
want
to
protect
the
Integrity
of
their
Community,
as
as
they
should
100,
but
I.
Don't
believe
that
a
continuance
will
lead
them
to
better
understand
why
we
precipitated
these
changes
and
that
it's
not
designed
to
increase
the
amount
of
people
coming
into
the
facility,
but
rather
to
address
significant
life
safety
issues
that
we
had
with
the
fire
marshal
when
we
went
through
our
zoning,
the
first
time
around
the
first
iteration
of
the
design.
Z
What
was
flawed
with
it
and
why
we
had
to
make
significant
changes.
Things
like
bringing
stairwells
inside
the
building
right
and
so
on
that
added
3,
000
square
feet,
and
so
I
don't
want
to
get
into
the
details.
Because
I
know
that's
in
the
next
phase.
But
my
point
is
that
this
process,
I
understand,
creates
a
challenge.
But-
and
that's
why
I
understand
your
hesitation
but
I,
don't
think
that
a
continuance
is
going
to
lead
the
people
in
the
community
to
have
a
different
perspective,
because
when
I
met
with
their
representative
who
spoke
here,
she.
U
Z
No
interest
in
looking
at
the
design
I
came
with
my
laptop
ready
to
present
the
reason
why
the
meeting
was
20
minutes
is
because
she
said,
there's
nothing
else
to
say
she
even
told
me
this
is
I
have
to
to
set
a
precedent.
Was
her
exact
words.
The
precedent
is
against
this
kind
of
expansion,
which
I
understand
that's
her
prerogative.
But
that
tells
me
that
this
is
not
a
question
of
we
didn't
have
time
to
meet.
We
didn't
have
time
to
talk.
Z
We
couldn't
work
it
out,
it
means
to
say:
is
you
represent
a
certain
development
and
progression
that
we
do
not
want
to
see
here
in
this
community
and
again,
I
felt
I'm,
not
faulting
her
for
that,
but
I.
Don't
think
that
a
continuance
is
going
to
address
that
concern
and
that's
why
I
think
in
the
interest
of
just
pushing
off
this
project,
rather
than
now
we're
ready
to
move
forward,
thank
God,
pushing
off
the
project
unnecessarily
costing
more
money,
which
is
what
will
happen
for
a
non-profit
I.
Don't
think
that's
expeditious,
I,
don't
think.
N
C
I
D
Kate
Wells
legal
department,
the
rezoning
application
that
has
been
that
is
under
item
8
on
your
agenda,
requires
the
NMU
24
land
use
designation
in
order
to
move
forward.
So
if
the
comp
plan
amendment
in
item,
one
is
not
approved
today,
if
it's
denied,
then
the
applicant
has
the
opportunity
to
either
withdraw
the
rezoning
application,
or
this
Council
would
then
have
no
choice
but
to
deny
the
rezoning
application
because
it
necessarily
requires
the
NMU
24
designation.
S
Just
a
comment:
just
for
the
record:
when
we
dealt
with
the
Midtown
project,
we
made
his
condition
of
PD
approval
or
rezonian
approval
obtaining
the
land
use
change.
Okay,
so
that
was
my
suggestion
is
continued.
This
hearing
hear
the
zoning
case
make
the
zoning
approval
contingent
upon
the
land
use
change?
Okay,
it's
just
a
suggestion
just
to
keep
this
thing
moving.
A
N
C
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
A
A
A
B
A
C
Council
I
just
thank
you
for
the
the
opportunity
for
that
time
to
to
address
some
process
questions
and
to
get
clear
with
this
process
being
set
up.
The
way
it
is
Mr
Bentley
had
raised
a
suggestion
that
that
we
would
move
to
the
the
rezoning
with
this
being
continued
and
it's
been
agreed
upon.
I
agree
with
with
Ms
wells
in
her
position,
and
it's
the
same
as
my
position,
which
is
that
has
not
been
done.
What
you
have
before
you
is
you
have
this.
C
This
needs
to
move
forward,
and
if
this
moves
forward
affirmatively,
then
you
will
be
able
to
get
to
the
rezoning,
but
the
decision.
Now
the
threshold
question
is
what
you
want
to
do
as
a
legislative
matter.
With
this
comprehensive
plan,
future
land
use
map
Amendment.
K
Awesome
Shelby:
we
have
a
process
in
place
which
we
now
a
lot
of
things.
We
feel
some
of
these
processes
are
kind
of
flawed
a
little
bit,
but
since
we
have
a
process
now,
let's
say
we
move
this
forward
and
we
go
to
number
eight
in
the
resume
at
that
point.
This
Council
has
the
right
to
put
stipulations
on
the
resulting
they're,
correct,
they're,
incorrect.
F
D
S
S
A
N
Yeah
you
know
this
is
a
legislative
matter
and
comprehensive
plan
is
based
on
lots
and
lots
of
public
input
from
neighborhoods
and
community
members
and
everything.
Then
there's
consensus
built
around
it,
and
so,
when
there's
a
when
there's
a
comprehensive
plan
change,
then
in
theory
it
should
include
the
same
kind
of
public,
Outreach
and
scrutiny,
and
in
this
case
the
the
community
in
the
neighborhood
says
that
they
still
have
thoughts
to
give
or
feedback
to
give,
and
they
would
like
to
have
a
conversation.
N
At
the
same
time
that
the
the
comprehensive
plan
changes,
it
seems
to
me,
need
to
have
public
input.
It
would
be
better
to
delay
it
for
a
couple
weeks
to
to
to
encourage
that
and
if,
at
that
time
the
then
the
neighborhood
refused
to
meet,
then
that's
the
neighborhood's
fault,
but
in
the
meantime
there
might
be
some
constructive
discussion
that
would
help
this
move
forward
faster
than
being
to
them
being
voted
down.
K
S
I
talked
to
the
client
and
Mr
Carlson
made
a
good
suggestion
that
we
delay
this
two
weeks,
give
us
the
opportunity
to
have
further
discussions
with
the
community
and
their
representatives,
and
hopefully,
they'll,
result
in
something
positive.
If
not
we'll
be
back
here
in
two
weeks
and
say
at
least,
we
gave
it
a
try
so
and.
C
We'll
check
we're
checking
to
see
if
of
the
availability
for
April
27th.
It
is
an
alcohol
night.
According
to
your
calendar,
it's
an
alcoholic
beverage
night,
there's
only
one
listed
here,
but
that
doesn't
mean
they
haven't
been
scheduled
because
it
is
March,
27th
or
April.
Excuse
me,
April
27th
did
I,
say
March
I'm,
sorry,
we're.
J
A
N
Q
A
N
C
Just
cancel
just
a
reminder
that
you've
you've
heard
you've
heard
everybody's
presentations.
You've
heard
the
opportunity
to
for
the
public
to
speak.
The
matter
would
be
it
wouldn't
be
a
another
full
presentation.
Unless
there
are
substantial
changes
or
something
happens,
that
people
would
be
able
to
address
the
potential
changes
but
to
have
another
whole
full
presentation
from
either
sides.
We.
C
N
N
So
I'd
like
to
I
like
to
move
to
continue
item
number
one
file:
number
ta,
CPA
22-26
to
March
23rd,
to
be
the
first
item
on
the
501
PM
agenda.
Y
Good
evening
my
name
is
Stephanie
Poyner
I'd,
just
like
to
say
that
I'd
support
this
continuance,
because,
while
the
rabbi
has
stood
up
here
and
said
that
he
wants
to
do
this,
for
the
community
and
I
would
agree
with
that.
But
you
can't
do
things
for
the
community,
without
speaking
with
the
community
and
having
a
neighborhood
meeting
and
inviting
the
people
who
live
within
250
feet
would
be
the
ideal
movement
forward.
We
look
forward
to
hearing
about
that.
Thank
you.
X
Just
very
quickly
I'm
glad
for
the.
X
Okay,
Sandra
Sanchez
2705,
fig
Street,
Tampa,
Armory,
Gardens
I
agree
with
the
continuance
on
the
and
I
hope
that
with
between
now
and
that
time
that
the
rabbi
will
reach
out
to
talk
to
me,
we'd
never
received
a
letter.
We
never
received
an
email,
we
did
receive
the
Good
Neighbor
notice,
but
never
an
attempt
to
talk
to
us
so
I
would
assume
that
the
continuance
will
go
forward
on
the
condition
that
he
has
met
with
the
community
or
at
least
representatives
from
the
community.
Thank
you.
C
And
Mr
chairman
and
members
of
council,
if
I,
can
follow
up
with
that
statement
before
Mr
Bentley
has
a
last
word
if
he
does,
but
I
just
want
to
state
that
your
code
does
not
require
a
neighborhood
meeting
presently,
and
this
is
as
a
result
of
this
discussion
and
again
that
has
come
up
in
the
past
and
I.
C
Don't
know
what
the
process
is
now
with
regard
to
staff
where
this
stands,
but
if
Council
wishes
to
have
neighborhood
compatibility
meetings
or
whatever
Council
or
the
staff
wishes
to
call
it
the
city
and
make
that
as
part
of
the
process,
that
would
have
to
be
amended
into
your
code.
C
W
C
C
U
C
My
suggestion
is
that
you
reach
out
to
to
staff,
do
you
have,
and
by
the
way,
just
so
for
the
record
we're
just
over
the
clear
with
regard
to
your
comments,
you
did
waive
your
time,
but
you
what
you're
doing
now
is
you're,
taking
the
opportunity
to
ask
a
question
right.
W
E
Just
think
it
would
be
helpful
so
that
none
of
us
violate
none
of
us
intend
to
violate
anything,
but
we
could
do
it
accidentally
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
it's
very
clear
what
we're
who
we're
allowed
to
talk
to
and
what
we're
allowed
to
talk
about,
so
that
there's
no
confusion
with
anyone
who
wants
to
contact
one
of
our
council
members.
That's
all
I'm
asking.
E
C
Frankly,
with
a
pending
rezoning
matter,
that's
problematic,
because
it
is
very
difficult
to
be
able
to
avoid
steering
into
what
ultimately
and
we've
seen
that
tonight.
That,
in
terms
of
what
a
legislative
matter
with
the
land
use
plan,
is
that
what
it
could
ultimately
do
is
it
could
actually
Veer
into
matters
of
rezoning,
which
would
then
be
inappropriate
and
then
would
then
turn
into
an
ex
parte
communication,
which
then
could
put
the
burden
on
the
city
council
member
to
have
to
be
able
to
address
that,
for
the
purposes
of
the
record
right.
E
To
the
other
side,
aren't
we
losing
our
right
to
discuss
legislative
matters
that
that
are
we're
allowed
pursuant
to
the
the
ordinances
and
the
rules
governing
comp
plan
changes?
So
I,
don't
understand.
I.
Think
I
heard
tonight
that
we
could
speak
to
anybody
on
quasi-legislative
matters
and
that's
what
we
would
want
to
talk
to
not
not
the
quasi-judicial
issue.
E
Why
is
our
judicial
as
opposed
to
just
the
legislative?
Okay?
Sorry
alleged.
Excuse
me.
This
is
why
we
went
Clarity
so
on
a
legislative
matter.
I
would
like
to
be
able
to
talk
to
council
members
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I
have
am
able
to
exercise
that
right,
but
I
would
like
to
know
what
the
parameters
are
for
me
to
do.
That
and
I
recognize
there's
another
issue,
so
I
would
follow
any
parameters
that
I
need
to
follow
to
be
able
to
exercise
my
right.
C
What
I
will
do
is
I
will
I
will
be
able
to
address
that
with
you
and
and
we
we
can
discuss
this.
What
you're
asking
something
now
is
something
that
would
not
be
appropriate
to
be
able
to
give
you
instruction
now
as
to
how
to
go
forward.
My
advice
to
council
is
this
is
the
same
as
it
is
normally
that
Council.
E
Now-
but
this
applies
to
the
group
here-
can
we
have
that
in
writing?
Is
all
I'm
asking
for
just
so
that
the
public
knows
we
need
to
have
the
process
that
we
can
participate
and
we
don't
know
the
process
and
that
affects
all
of
us
in
this
room,
not
just
myself,
so
if
it
could
be
in
writing.
That
would
be
helpful
for
all.
E
E
C
C
Frankly,
it's
between
the
petitioner
and
it's
between
the
community
and
what
they
want
to
speak
of.
They
can
speak,
but
ultimately,
your
decision
is
based
on
certain
criteria
and
relevant
to
the
particular
matter
that
you
have
before
in
front
of
you.
I
am
not
going
to
be
able
to
when
a
hearing
comes
up
to
be
able
to
tell
people
when
they
meet
privately
with
the
with
the
applicant,
what
is
appropriate
and
how
to
speak.
I
cannot
do
that.
I'm,
sorry,
councilman.
A
N
I
just
want
to
say
that
we
all
we
all
it's
it's
my
understanding,
I'm
a
lawyer,
but
it
admire
saying
that
it's
it's
legal
for
all
of
you
to
send
emails,
and
we
read
all
the
emails
you
can
put
up.
Ms
Zimmerman
sends
very
long
detailed
emails.
We
will
we
read
all
the
emails.
The
emails
go
into
the
file,
so
they're
public
record,
but
that
it's
it's
one-way
communication.
But
you
can
say
everything
you
want
in
an
email
and
that
way
we'll
make
sure
we're
all
protected
legally
just
in
case.
J
And
this
just
reiterates
my
point
of
not
hearing
these
on
the
same
night,
because
that
is
a
legislative
issue
and
a
legislative
issue
should
be
able
to
be.
We
should
be
able
to
have
conversations
about
them.
Quasi-Judicial
is
different,
and
when
you
mix
the
two
that's
where
yes
I
can
see
how
the
public
feels
like
their
their
voices,
aren't
being
able
to
be
heard
whatever
it
takes
to
divide
these
going
forward.
J
A
A
A
N
R
K
A
K
K
What's
going
on
in
their
city
now
so
I'm
just
saying
with
this
Council
moving
forward,
whoever
may
be,
you
may
have
to
look
at
again
separating
these
two
and
also
making
sure
that
there's
some
type
of
understanding
the
community,
they
can
know
what
a
legislative
matter
is
versus
a
quasi
judicial
matter,
because
everyday
people-
they
just
don't
know
what
that
means.
They're
just
here
to
prevent
their
concerns
or
frustrated
for
or
against.
K
You
know
the
girls
will
be
here
until
a
few
others
do.
Maybe
we
need
to
look
at
the
process
and
change
the
process,
so
the
community
give
me
more
engage
because
that's
what
it
seemed
going
going
right
now
is
everybody
wants
to
know
to
be
to
be
a
part
of
the
process,
so
I
just
don't
use
my
few
words
for
two
hours.
H
H
This
was
privately
initiated
and
the
policy
was
previously
amended
by
ta
CPA
2101,
which
expanded
blending
from
within
an
Urban
Village
to
a
half
mile
outside
of
an
Urban
Village
with
the
provision.
The
project
is
approved
through
a
plan
development
or
a
plan,
development
a
and
at
least
one
acre
in
size,
and
the
provision
cannot
be
applied
to
lands
outside
of
the
central
Tampa.
The
central
Tampa,
Planning
District.
L
H
The
Planning
Commission
found
it
consistent
with
multiple
aspects
of
the
comprehensive
plan
relating
to
the
promotion
of
the
compact
City
form
strategy
to
provide
greater
density
and
intensity
near
the
urban
Villages,
and
greater
flexibility
in
the
development
process
will
streamline
the
development
of
the
city
from
inform
encouraged
by
the
comprehensive
plan
and
the
Planning
Commission
recommends
that
the
proposed
tax
amendment
be
found
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
And
this
concludes
my
presentation
can.
J
H
P
P
To
councils
Emily
alluded
to
you.
This
is
a
comprehensive
plan
text
Memo.
We
we
just
had
a
pretty
robust
discussion
about
a
map
Amendment
where
you're
changing
the
colors
on
the
plan.
This
is
a
text
Amendment
and
while
this
textman
was
motivated
by
a
specific
development,
this
has
a
little
bit
of
a
different
approval
cycle
than
what
you're
accustomed
to.
As
Emily
said,
this
is
a
transmittal
hearing,
so
back
in
the
day,
the
state
had
a
much
heavier
hand
in
local
land
use
regulation.
P
That's
really
been
abandoned,
but
this
is
still
a
Vestige
of
that
so
tonight.
If,
if
you
approve
this
this
item,
what
you're
really
doing
is
transmitting
it
to
Tallahassee
to
the
Department
of
Economic
Opportunity
I.
Don't
get
the
sense
that
they
really
look
at
this
too
closely
and
if
you
don't
hear
from
them
after
30
days,
it's
sort
of
deemed
that
they
have
no
comment,
and
it
comes
back
here
for
not
a
second
reading.
P
It's
called
the
adoption
hearing
and
that's
that's
it
so
you
still
have
two
hearings,
but
the
first
is
called
a
transmittal
hearing.
That's
today,
the
folks
in
Tallahassee
will
at
in
April
and
it'll,
come
back
here
in
May.
If
you
see
below
in
in
the
dashed
line,
I
I
do
want
to
say
just
for
context
that
this
is
not
an
idea
that
just
came
up.
You
know
this
was
not
like
a
shower
thought.
This
is
a
text.
P
Amendment
that's
been
filed
because
of
a
very
specific
project
that
has
a
PD
rezoning
and
it
has
a
map
Amendment,
and
you
might
recall,
at
the
very
beginning
of
this
hearing,
we
asked
for
a
continuance
for
that
item
until
April.
That
is
so
all
of
this
will
hopefully,
if
the
stars
align
line
up
in
May
for
an
approval
of
of
all
three
items.
P
If
you
look
at
your
screen
on
screen,
you
see
something
that's
pretty
familiar
to
you,
which
is
a
group
of
rectangles
in
different
colors
of
purple
and
brown,
which
is
the
planning
commission's
preferred
color
palette.
Future
land
use
boundaries,
sometimes
change
at
roadways
and
right
away,
and
they
sometimes
change
mid
block
along
alleys.
If
you
drive
up
Dale
Mabry,
Kennedy
Howard,
it's
usually
not
the
whole
block,
that's
the
same
color.
It
usually
actually
stops
at
the
old
platted
alley.
P
P
If
this
were
in
the
county
anywhere
in
Hillsborough
County,
you
can
add
up
the
different
colors
of
development
rates,
move
them
around
the
site.
However
you
want
to,
but
in
in
Tampa
it's
it's
pretty
limited.
The
circumstances,
in
which
case
you
can
do
that
and
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
add
a
little
bit
more
flexibility
which
I
think
I'll,
hopefully
get
to
at
the
end
of
this,
we
think
makes
sense
as
good
policy,
but
this
did
come
up
due
to
a
specific
site,
as
I
alluded
to.
This
is
a
specific
site.
P
This
is
an
example,
but
this
is
the
example
of
the
project
that
this
text
amendment
was
filed
as
a
result
of
it's
at
the
northeast
corner
of
Kennedy
Boulevard
in
tampania.
So
it's
one
parcel
on
Kennedy
Boulevard
and
the
other
side
of
the
alley.
You
have
two
Parcels
that
are
on
North
a,
and
this
is
at
the
very
Southeast
corner
of
the
Armory
Gardens
neighborhood.
P
It's
it's
right,
adjacent
to
what
what's
referred
to
as
North
Hyde
Park,
as
Emily
mentioned
in
councilman
hertek
noted
with
about
the
the
or
there
there's
currently
two
ways
that
you
can
do
this
blending,
if
you're
in
one
of
those
Urban
Villages,
which
aren't
those
are
even
here
much
about
the
urban
Villages
but
they're
generally
large
blocks
of
discernible
neighborhoods
near
the
urban
core,
Tampa
Heights,
Ybor
City
things
like
that.
P
So
you
can
do
this
blending
in
urban
Villages
where
you
add
up
the
different
types
of
density,
and
then
you
move
them
around
the
site
through
APD
zoning.
You
can
only
use
this
through
a
PD
zoning
that
of
course
comes
before
the
city
council.
The
other
way
you
can
do
it
is
with
four
standards.
It's
got
to
be
an
APD
meaning
it
has
to
come
to
you
all.
This
does
not
create
any
buy
right
entitlement,
it
has
to
be
in
the
central
Tampa
Planning
District.
P
It
has
to
be
within
half
a
mile
of
an
Urban
Village,
and
the
project
has
to
be
greater
than
one
acre,
as
you
will
continue
to
see,
I
think
as
Council.
It
is
getting
a
little
bit
more
challenging
to
find
development
sites
that
have
the
perfect
entitlements.
Where
everyone's
welcoming
you
know,
whatever
the
new
use
is
it's
the
right
shape,
there's
no
trees,
it
is
as
Tampa
grows.
It's
getting
harder
I'm,
just
getting
harder.
P
I
should
say
that
the
the
land
available
for
India
construction,
especially
if
it's
just
a
surface
parking
lot,
is
probably
going
to
have
something
a
little
bit
wrong
with
it.
It's
going
to
be
a
weird
shape.
It's
going
to
have
some
weird
title
issue
and
it's
it
might
not
be
an
acre.
An
acre
is
43
560
square
feet.
That's
a
pretty
good
piece
of
land
for
being
near
the
city.
P
So
as
an
example
or
this
hypothetical
project
at
2517,
Kennedy
Boulevard,
you
would
have
to
develop
the
density
generated
from
the
brown
Parts
on
the
brown
parts,
and
you
would
have
to
use
the
density
from
the
pink
part
on
the
pink
part.
There
would
be
no
way
to
shift
the
entire
building
on
to
Kennedy
Boulevard,
because
this
site's,
not
one
acre,
we
have
met
and
Tim
will
talk
more
about
this.
We've
had
a
community
meeting
Tim's
the
owner
of
a
wine
store
in
Northside
Park
called
bottlesmith.
P
We
had
a
community
meeting
and
what
was
fairly
clear
is
that
the
neighbors
did
not
want
these
North
a
Parcels
developed.
They
were.
You
could
do
four
Town
Homes,
probably
there
now
or
five
they
wanted.
The
density
shifted
away.
They
wanted
it
on
Kennedy
Boulevard,
which
which
makes
sense
as
Kennedy
Boulevard
is
an
artillo
Road.
It's
a
mixed-use
corridor.
It's
the
type
of
high
traffic
Street,
where
it's
it
makes
sense
to
have
maybe
a
little
bit
of
a
taller
building
than
on
North
a.
P
That
is
why
we
filed
this
tax
amendment.
We
have
filed
this
text
Amendment
so
that
this
project
and
it's
going
to
benefit
other
projects.
I
will
say
that
there
have
been
a
few
different
projects
where
we
have
almost
filed
something
like
this
and
I
I.
This
will
continue
to
get
filed
because
it
is
a
need
for
greater
flexibility,
but
we
think
there's
a
lot
of
accountability
with
it.
So
here
is
exactly
what
we
are
proposing
this
number
one
through
three.
That
is
exactly
what
the
code
says
today.
P
P
So
again,
one
through
three
that
you're
seeing
on
screen.
That's
the
the
code,
the
standard,
as
is
number
four,
it's
got
to
be
greater
than
an
acre.
What
we're
proposing
is
that,
if
the
site's
not
an
acre,
but
it's
on
an
arterial,
Road
you're
able
to
take
advantage
of
this
flexibility
and
by
taking
advantage
of
this
flexibility,
I
mean
file
a
PD
rezoning
that
comes
to
you.
No
one
can
go
if
this
gets
approved,
no
one
can
go
to
the
permit
office
and
get
anything
they
can't.
P
P
These
are
roads
that,
for
the
most
part,
I
don't
think
this
Council
would
be
shocked
by
if
someone
brought
a
four
or
five
six
story
building
in
their
roads,
where
there
is
maybe
perhaps
a
difference
between
the
density
that
you
want
to
have
on
that
road
and
in
the
rear
in
the
neighborhood.
There's
a
difference
between
North,
a
and
Kennedy
Boulevard
and
I.
Think
the
Armory
Gardens
neighborhood
would
agree
with
that.
P
What
we're
seeking
through
this
text
amendment
is
the
ability
to
shift
as
an
example
the
density
that
could
be
used,
the
buildings
that
could
go
on
a
place
like
North,
a
just
onto
Kennedy
Boulevard,
and
it's
not
just
us
that
desires
that,
in
the
case
of
this
specific
application,
we
know
that
it's
the
desire
of
of
the
neighborhood
it's
worth
noting
I've
talked
to
Larry
primac
about
this,
because
I've
had
some
surprises
about
text.
P
Amendments
that
I
didn't
think
would
have
the
scrutiny
Davis
Island
Harbor
Island
are
there
are
new
our
trailer
roads
on
those
on
those
islands.
You
can
actually
already
do
this
on
Davis
Island,
because
it
is
a
Urban
Village,
but
again
I
want
to
go
back
to
remind
Council
about
what
type
of
Roads
you're
talking
about,
and
the
greatest
Safeguard
of
all
for
this
is
only
new
PDS
are
allowed
to
to
utilize.
This
I
know
there
might
be
a
little
bit
of
fatigue
about
PDS
and
I.
P
Wouldn't
say
it's
just
on
one
side
of
of
this.
This
Podium
they
have
a
lot
of
flexibility
PDS,
but
they
do
not
have
flexibility
for
this
for
a
site
for
these
purple
and
brown
triangles
site
on
Kennedy
Boulevard,
you
have
no
choice
but
to
do
some
building
in
the
neighborhood
and
a
little
bit
less
than
it's
probably
appropriate
on
Kennedy.
So
we
believe
this
tax
amendment
is
extremely
narrow
because
it's
reasonable.
It's
not
just
us
that
believes
that
the
Planning
Commission
unanimously
recommended
approval
of
this.
P
The
plant
efficient
staff
recommended
approval
and
I
believe
City
Planning
is
here,
I,
don't
want
to
speak
for
them,
but
I
understand
that
they
I,
don't
believe,
have
any
objections
to
this.
So
with
that
I'm
happy
to
actually
I'd
like
to
turn
it
briefly
safer
to
Tim.
Who
can
talk
a
little
bit
more
personally
about
what
he
heard
from
The
Neighbors
about
where
they
do
and
don't
want
a
building.
AC
Good
evening,
Tim
Johnson
for
the
record,
so
this
is
I,
think
important
for
the
city
as
we
continue
to
grow,
the
the
larger
sites
become
less
abundant
and
without
the
flexibility
that
this
would
provide,
it
really
bifurcates
the
development
into
a
large
size,
larger
sites
that
can
capture
all
the
density
in
smaller
sites
that
can't
and
the
smaller
sites
are
a
number
of
smaller
sites
on
arterial
Road
rays.
AC
I
met
with
the
Armory
Gardens
neighborhood
and
North
Hyde
Park
alliances
met
for
a
few
hours.
A
couple
weeks
ago
talked
through
this.
We're
not
here
tonight
to
present
any
specific
PD
rezoning.
It's
specifically
to
focus
on
the
tax
amendment
here
and
to
provide
flexibility
continue
to
maximize
potential
opportunities
of
these
artillery
arterial
roadways
within
the
city.
P
Neglected
to
say
this
at
the
outset,
but
we
do
have
some
letters
of
support
which
I
believe
were
emailed
give
to
Mr
Shelby
just
enter
into
the
record.
Just
the
names
of
those
are
Nate:
Siegel,
Grant,
Peterson,
Chad,
Rupp,
Chris,
Butler
and
Ken
Cowart,
who
are
either
immediate
residents,
Property
Owners
or
business
owners
in
the
area.
So
with
that,
thanks
for
your
time
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
P
Sure
it's
that's
a
tough
question
to
answer,
because
again
this
only
applies
to
when
someone
would
draw
a
a
square,
that's
less
than
an
acre
and
they
hit
two
colors.
If
you,
if
you
draw
a
square
and
it's
lesson
maker,
but
it's
all
the
same
color
on
the
map,
it's
it's
all
some
pinkish,
reddish
color
it
wouldn't
matter.
P
I
I!
Think
that
the
way
you'll
see
this
the
only
way,
the
councilman
that
you
would
see
this
utilize.
If
someone
comes
to
you
and
says,
here's
my
specific
plan
for
where
I
want
to
use
it
here,
I
mean
I.
Think
a
lot
of
the
artillo
roads
like
Dale,
Mabry
and
Kennedy,
there's
a
lot
of
really
large,
acre
plus
sites.
So
I
candidly,
don't
think
this
is
going
to
be
something
that's
burning
up,
sire
with
applications
for
it,
but
I
I
do
think
it's
it's
a
somewhat
inevitable
change!
I!
Think!
P
J
I
appreciate
this
I
think
I
understand
it,
but
so
from
my
understanding,
if
you
own
these
Parcels
you're
Shifting
the
density
toward
the
major
road,
but
what
goes
back
so?
What
I'm,
thinking
of
and
I
I
believe
it's
been
30
days
so
y'all
can
Kate
can
tell
me
if
I
I'm
wrong,
but
we
had
this.
We
had
a
plan
on
Kennedy
that
we
approved
a
while
ago
that
had
the
major
majority
of
the
density
on
Kennedy
and
then
it
stair-stepped
down-
is
that
basically
what
this
would
allow.
P
It
would
it
would
really
allow
any
configuration
in
Candor
I
mean
it
would
allow
someone
to
try
to
shift
it
all
to
the
back.
I
think
the
Safeguard
against
that
would
be
the
PD
rezoning
I.
Don't
think
that
would
go
well
unless
there's
like
a
Grand
Tree
or
some
really
unusual
situation.
I
think
the
way
to
think
about
this
and
I
realized
that
these
text
amendments
be
challenging
because
they
seem
a
little
conceptual
is
in
in
certain
areas.
The
square
footage
is
is
fluid.
You
can
move,
you
can
move
it
around.
P
You
can
move
it
around
that
big
tree.
You
can
push
it
more
towards
the
west
or
the
East
for
for
sites
that
aren't
an
acre
but
they're
on
an
arterial.
It's
like
ice,
it's
frozen,
and
so
you
sort
of
have
no
choice
but
to
build
okay,
the
four
town
homes
on
North
a
and
the
two-story
building
on
Kennedy,
when
perhaps
it
makes
sense
in
I,
don't
want
any
so
I
want
to
cross-contaminate
things.
P
But
theoretically,
someone
could
just
put
the
entire
building
on
the
Kennedy
parcel
and
not
put
any
buildings
on
the
on
a
North
a
parcel
at
all,
but
this
would
allow
the
flexibility
through
the
PD
for
someone
to
present
to
this
Council,
whatever
configuration
of
density
is
desired.
The
issue
is
that,
right
now
it's
trapped.
If
you
have
a
site,
that's
less
than
an
acre.
AB
Oh
sorry,
I
think
I
know
what
situation
you're
talking
about
and
the
way
this
is
addressed
right
now.
Is
they
just
they
just
ask
for
a
plan
Amendment
for
the
back
part
and
they
increase
the
entitlement
across
the
board.
So
this
amendment
is
proposing
to
not
effectuate
that
it's
saying
instead
of
making
the
whole
site
homogeneous
and
getting
a
plan
Amendment
for
whatever
you,
maybe
don't
quite
have
it's
saying
you
can
just
take
what's
already
there
and
shift
it
to
the
front
without
having
to
make
it
all
consistent.
Yes,.
J
J
That's
why
I
was
using
that
one
as
an
example,
because
that
was
a
great
example
of
Lo,
of
having
both
that
was
a
combining
of
multiple
Parcels,
but
basically
the
the
higher
building
toward
the
front
and
then
stair
stepping
down
toward
the
back
in
theory.
This
is
what
would
be
encouraged.
P
Sure,
let's
use
the
example
of
the
pink
and
brown
rectangles
that
were
on
screen.
If
the
piece
on
North
a
the
Brown,
let's
say
that
could
generate
10
000
square
feet
in
the
pink
on
Kennedy
Boulevard
could
generate
20
000
square
feet.
A
developer
right
now
can
do
10
000
up
there
and
twenty
thousand
Kennedy.
P
What
this
would
allow
a
developer
to
do
is
put
30
000
square
feet
on
Kennedy
in
in
nothing,
there'd,
be
no
square
footage
at
all
on,
because
again,
comp
plan
gives
you
my
kids
are
into
play
there
right
now
at
the
Play-Doh
gives
you
the
stuff,
the
development
rights
to
to
utilize
and
Zoning
implements
it,
the
height,
the
mass,
the
setbacks
and
all
that.
So,
if
you,
if
someone
were
to
use
this
provision,
they
would
say
we
have
30
000
square
feet
total.
We
want
to
put
them
all
at
the
front.
N
Mr
Hudson
talked
is
a
question
of
her
staff.
Mr
President
talked
about
the
definition
of
arterials.
Is
there
a
legal
definition
in
in
what
roads
specifically
are
covered
under
it.
R
N
Is
there
a
specific?
Is
there
a
specific
finite
definition
of
it
or
is
it
when
he
presented?
It
was
kind
of
vague
like
that,
some
some
roads
could
be
included,
and
some
not
is
there
a
specific
definition
so
that
someone
will
know
specifically
what
roads
are
included,
for
example,
Davis,
Island
Boulevard
somebody
might
consider
that
an
arterial,
but
if
it,
if
it's
certain
amount
of
traffic
or
whatever,
then
maybe
it
wouldn't.
R
There
are
definitions,
but
the
the
classifications
are
said
by
the
Departments,
so
it's
they're
not
like
defined
by
a
certain
parameter
so.
R
S
N
Then,
what's
the
process
you
go
through
to
designate
a
new,
let's
say
that
Davis
Island
Boulevard
is
not
designated
and
somebody
wants
to
build
something
there.
So
they
say
come
to
you
and
say
we
want
that
designated
as
an
arterial,
but
is.
R
R
These
are
like
higher
volume,
roadways
and
might
be
a
certain
vehicles,
but.
N
R
Are
some
general
guidelines
and
so
forth?
I
don't
have
those
offhand,
but
they
are
higher
volumes
either
you'd
be
like
a
local,
collector
or
Turtle.
They
have
different
levels
apart.
N
Yeah,
this
is
way
too
big
for
me.
This
is
why
I
don't
like
the
comprehensive
plan
we
need
we.
This
is
this:
it's
I
don't
like
things
that
that
are
not
specific,
because
it
leaves
it
too
open
for
interpretation.
What's
an
arterial,
you
know
somebody
one
day
can
come
in
and
just
say:
I
I
anyway,
it's
very
frustrating.
Thank
you.
R
R
We
go
through
those
there's
a
process.
Every
couple
of
years
it's
looked
at
and
updated
I
think
the
the
most
recent
update
is
whatever
the
data
on
the
map
is
at
the
look,
not.
P
Recent
yeah,
if
TCG
TV,
could
bring
up
the
map,
I
can
can
share
that
and
I
figured
out
that
just
with
the
councilman
Carlson's
point
I
know
this.
The
comp
plan
does
seem
sort
of
vague
and
conceptual
and
that's
sort
of
by
its
nature,
but
there
will
never
be
an
instance
where
this
flexibility
is
utilized
in
a
general
way
someone's
going
to
bring
you
a
plan
and
say
this
is
on
one
two:
three
Dale
Mabry
and
we're
adding
up
our
rights
and
here's
how
we're
going
to
put
them.
P
Someone
tries
to
put
all
the
development
rights
back
into
the
neighborhood
they
can
ask
for
that,
but
that's
not
going
to
get
approved
it's
conceptual
by
Nature.
We
can't
make
this
any
more
specific
than
it
is.
We
think
this
is
a
very
you
know,
four-point
plan,
it's
very
specific
and
again
I
think
it's
important
to
note,
sorry
that
this
will
only
be
implemented
by
a
specific
PD
rezoning.
P
So
that's
the
that's
the,
and
this
is
really
first
I
can
say.
As
someone
who
comes
before
this
Council
fairly
often
it
is
I've.
Never
you
cannot
reclassify
these
roads.
We've
we've
tried.
Can
you
see
it.
P
All
right,
sorry,
there
we
go,
and
this
is
a
little
bit
tough
to
read,
but
it's
the
darker
black
lines.
AB
P
N
The
yeah
this
is
this
is
my
point
like
usually
in
science
or
engineering.
I,
think
somebody
would
say:
arterial
is
5,
000
trips
per
hour
or
something
there's
a
specific
cut
off,
and
so
there
would
have
to
be
a
study
to
figure
out.
Is
it
above
5000
or
not
whatever?
The
criteria
is,
but
regardless
of
that
you're
saying
that
that
it
can
be
up
that
we
would
work.
AB
AB
N
A
A
Other
questions
for
for
the
petitioner
is
there
any
one
of
Chambers
who
would
like
to
speak
to
this
agenda?
Item
number
three:
ta
CPA
22-30.
A
All
in
favor
say
aye
aye
aye.
All
opposed
now
make
your
your
motion.
N
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
say,
I
think
that
the
public
is
sufficiently
protected
by
the
fact
that
the
map
has
to
the
map,
which
is
part
of
the
criteria,
has
to
come
before
Council,
and
also
also
the
these
are
PDS,
which
also
have
to
come
before
Council
and
so
I
will
not
object
to
it.
Based
on
those
grounds.
Thank
you.
A
A
A
O
AD
David
Haye,
Planning
Commission
staff
I,
have
been
sworn
our
first
rezoning
for
this
evening
is
located
within
the
central
Tampa
planning
district.
More
specifically,
the
West
Tampa
Urban
Village,
the
closest
Transit
is
located
at
Cyprus
and
Willow.
The
closest
public
recreation
facility
is
Julian,
B,
Lane,
Riverfront,
Park
and
the
subject
site
is
located
within
the
coastal
planning
area
and
is
in
a
level
B
evacuation
Zone.
AD
Here
we
move
on
to
the
aerial
this.
This
is
the
subject
site
right
in
the
center.
This
is
North
Willow,
Avenue
running
north
south,
and
then
we
have
West
Cass
Street
about
one
block
to
the
South.
This
is
the
Jade
at
North,
Hyde,
Park,
the
apartment
community,
this
area
there's
some
office
light
industrial
uses,
especially
south
of
this
side
of
Cass,
then
North
predominantly
north
of
Willow
North
West
is
single
family
detached
and
then
there's
some
more
mix
of
single-family
detached
and
town
homes
and
and
multi-family
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site.
AD
Here
we
have
the
future
land
use
map
the
subject
site
and
this
brown
color
is
all
the
residential
35
future
land
use
category
immediately
to
the
north.
On
West
Lemon
Street,
it
goes
down
to
the
residential
20
by
the
light
brown
to
the
South.
You've
got
this
in
this
pink
color
is
the
general
mixed
use,
24,
and
then
we
do
have
some
Community
mixed
use,
35.,
which
is
more
of
the
pink
color,
and
then
it
does
go
down
to
umu
60
even
further
to
the
South.
AD
The
subject
site
again
is
within
that
residential
35.
That
designation
is
entitled
is
intended
for
medium
density
uses,
including
single-family
attached
and
multi-family.
This
portion
of
West
Lemon
Street
between
North
Willow,
Avenue
and
North
Delaware
Avenue,
excluding
the
subject
site,
has
an
existing
density
of
9.68
units
per
acre.
That's
based
off
of
11
sample
sites
along
that
block.
The
existing
the
existing
density
represents
28
percent
of
the
anticipated
density
under
the
residential
35
future
land
use
designation.
The
plan
development
would
allow
for
a
development
of
20
dwelling
units
per
acre.
AD
The
proposed
density
is
57
percent
of
the
anticipated
density
under
the
residential
35.,
though
most
of
the
parcels
on
this
segment
of
West
lemon
contain
single-family
detached
residential
uses.
The
comprehensive
plan
does
encourage
multi-family
and
single-family
attached
residential
uses
in
that
residential
35.
AD
Commission
staff
finds
that
the
proposed
request
will
provide
for
a
development
that
is
compatible
with
that
residential
35,
designation
and
the
surrounding
area,
especially
as
the
area
south
of
West
Cass
Street
has
been
transitioning
towards
a
mixed-use
multi-family
development
pattern.
The
request
supports
many
of
the
policies
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
as
it
relates
to
the
population,
the
population
growth.
The
comprehensive
plan
promotes
a
development
pattern
consistent
with
the
compact
City
form,
which
encourages
infill
development
and
based
on
those
considerations.
AD
O
O
The
site
again
is
located
along
North,
Willow,
Avenue
and
West
Lemon
Street
Parking,
there's
seven
parking
spaces
required
and
seven
are
being
proposed.
It
setbacks
proposed
or
North
five
feet:
South
13
feet,
West
10
feet.
Although
there
is
a
waiver
to
reduce
the
block
average
of
19
feet
and
East
14
feet,
the
site
is
located
in
the
West
Tampa
overlay,
District
and
overall
development
and
reviewing
compliance.
O
Staff
has
reviewed
the
petition
and
finds
the
request
inconsistent,
please
see
or
regarding
Transportation
waiver
requested,
and
that
waiver
is
to
produce
aisle
with
from
24
feet
to
20
feet.
Additionally,
if
approving
this
application,
the
wording
on
waiver,
one
from
increase,
needs
to
be
changed
to
decreased.
If
approving
this
application
and
I'm
going
to
give
you
show
you
a
few
more
pictures.
O
M
M
The
driveways
were
oriented
toward
Lemon
Street
and
when
we
went
through
our
reviews
and
I
I
think
you
might
remember
a
month
ago
or
so
ago,
and
when
we
asked
for
a
continuance,
it
was
to
to
reevaluate
and
reorient
the
site
so
that
we
could
meet
the
Urban
Design
criteria,
so
we
flipped
the
site
over
and
so
now
the
access
is
on
the
rear
of
via
alley.
We
will
have
to
improve
that
alley
to
City
of
Tampa
standards.
M
We'll
also
have
to
bring
up
the
infrastructure,
the
water
sewer
lines
as
well
to
effectively
allow
for
this
development
to
go
forward.
So
the
proposal
is
to
allow
for
three
townhouses.
We
would
be
allowed
under
the
normal
circumstances.
Under
the
the
land
use
classification
for
five
units,
we're
proposing
three
units
we
found
the
Planning
Commission
has
found
us
to
be
consistent
so
that
this
development
could
move
forward.
They've
also
found
that
there
was
a
meet
in
the
immediate
proximity
of
this
development.
M
There
are
other
mixed-use
developments,
there's
other
townhouses
Apartments
office
uses
and
some
heavy
heavy
commercial.
We
are
required
to
have
208
square
feet
of
green
space,
we're
providing
1044
square
feet
of
Green
Space,
which
is
in
excess.
Now,
that
also
is,
is
what's
pushing
us
to
ask
for
the
waivers
on
the
setbacks.
M
However,
we
believe
that
we've
met
the
intent
of
the
code
and
we've
exceeded
it
in
many
respects,
and
all
of
these
will
be
two-story
units
which
they've
also
found
to
be
compatible.
The
the
residential
35
I
think,
as
the
staff
had
mentioned,
would
allow
for
six
units
or
I'm.
Sorry
would
allow
for
five
units
and
we're
proposing
three,
the
locational
issue
regarding
this.
It
meets
all
of
the
locational
criterias
established
by
the
city
in
the
land
use
plan.
M
M
M
I
think
that
we,
you
know,
we've
gone
a
long
way.
I
can
read
all
of
the
different
criteria
that
we
have
met
and-
and
it
is
established
in
your
report
as
well-
would
last
like
to
asset
to
be
received
and
filed
and
made
part
of
the
record,
promote
the
efficient
and
sustainable
use
of
land,
land
uses
and
infrastructure,
and
there's
a
long
paragraph
in
here
that
establishes
that
that's
27
136
under
purposes
allow
the
integration
of
different
land
uses
and
densities
in
one
of
the
development
areas.
This
is
an
area
that's
designated
for
redevelopment.
M
It's
anticipated
the
R35.
It
clearly
demonstrates
that
this
is
anticipated
to
be
a
a
higher
density.
Development
Area
encourage
the
flexible
and
land
and
development
scale
where,
by
exceeding
the
Green
Space,
we
have
actually
been
able
to
to
do
a
better
job
of
providing
that
more
so
than
other
developments
that
we've
brought
before
you
in
the
past,
promote
and
encourage
the
development
where
appropriate
and
location
character
and
style,
and
we've
demonstrated
that
the
the
height
is
limited
to
the
35
feet.
M
This
is
on
page
four
and
page
five
of
your
staff
report
promote
the
more
desirable
living
and
environment
and
working
conditions.
This
is
very
close
to
the
University
of
Tampa
and,
as
you
know,
not
only
do
we
have
a
housing
demand
in
the
throughout
the
city.
We
have
another
demand,
that's
associated
with
the
University,
promote
architectural
features
and
elements
again.
This
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
development
and
it
doesn't
exceed
any
of
the
normal
Heights
of
the
properties
in
the
area.
M
Design
of
the
proposed
development
is
unique
and
therefore
is
needed.
The
waivers
well,
that's
why
I
mentioned
to
you
when
we
flipped
the
houses
so
that
the
access
was
to
the
rear
and
we're
trying
to
align
the
fronts
with
the
adjacent
properties
along
Lemon
Street.
That
is
what's
forcing
us
to
reduce
the
size
of
the
drywall
and
20
feet
and
on
a
drive
aisle
is,
is
not
completely
out
of
line.
It
is
not
what
you
would
call
Extreme.
M
M
It
is
in
Harmony
and
serves
the
intent
and
the
general
purposes
of
this
of
this
chapter.
The
Planning
Commission
has
already
indicated
that
it
was
consistent
with
their
Provisions
in
the
comprehensive
plan
allowing
the
the
waiver
would
result
in
substantial
Justice
being
done.
The
the
Clark
and
the
Smith
Stevens
family
would
be
able
to
move
on
they've
been
anticipating
this
rezoning
for
quite
some
time
and
they
are
very
eager
to
move
on
with
their
lives.
M
I
could
go
through
if
you
like,
and
enlist
all
of
the
comprehensive
plan
Provisions.
It
is
consistent
with
including
land
use
policies,
5.1.4,
8.14.1,
9.2.1,
9.71,
9.7.3.
M
9.6.1
9.6.2
9.6.3
the
other
policies,
including
1.117
1.118,
the
Cypress,
Street,
land
use
policies
and
2.12
1.3.1,
1.3.3,
1.3.4
and
again
they're.
All
in
your
staff
report
and
I'd
request
that
you
receive
and
file
that
and
make
that
part
of
the
record.
I'm,
certainly
here
to
ask
her
any
questions
and
we'll
be
happy
to
in
including
whatever
questions
you
might
have.
I
think
I've
covered
the
the
project.
J
I
think
this
is
a
lovely
design.
Thank.
M
You
we've
worked
really
hard
on
this
trying
to
to
bring
it
to
you
in
this
configuration
and
again
you
know
in
the
future
we're
probably
going
to
have
to
look
at
some
of
the
codes,
because
when
we
are
compatible
with
the
Urban
Design
overlays,
then
it
brings
us
not
into
compliance
with
other
codes
and
those
studies
are
going
on
now.
But
we
appreciate
your
consideration
and
certainly
would
appreciate
your
support.
A
AA
Good
evening
I'm
Andre
Clark-
and
this
is.
AA
Are
the
owners,
kids,
kids
from
my
mom,
my
mom,
that
I'm
headed
the
house
on
every
the
people
that
you
see
right
here?
There's
two
different
Generations.
My
parents
were
the
type
of
parents
that
especially
special
special
grandkids,
the
best
special
kids
that
they
looked
out
for
they
couldn't
do
nothing
by
themselves
with
just
them
two
living
there.
AA
AA
If
it's
a
situation
with
the
economy
and
it's
time
for
someone
else
to
enjoy
that
property
and
we're
willing
to
give
it
up-
and
we
can
go
continue
with
our
life
and
things
and
make
us
make
make
our
life
better,
be
willing
to
give
it
up
right
now
and
for
somebody
else
to
have
that
house
special
house
that
but
special
land
right
there,
because
it's
a
beautiful
land
when
you
step
outside
you
see
downtown
buildings,
Riverfront
Park
is
three
blocks
up.
Ut
is
three
blocks
up.
AA
A
A
F
N
You're
sorry
I'd
like
to
move
number
five
file:
number
Rez,
22-107
ordinance
being
presented
for
his
first
reading:
consideration,
ordinance,
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
1206
West,
Lemon
Street
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
and
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning,
District
classification,
rs50,
residential
single
family,
PD
plan
development,
residential
single
family
attached
providing
effective
date,
including
the
revision
sheet,
and
the
proposed
development
is
consistent
with
land
use
policy.
N
Two
point:
2.1
.2
and
housing
policy
is
1.3.1,
1.3.3
and
1.3.4,
which
encouraged
new
housing
on
vacant
and
or
utilized
land
to
ensure
that
an
adequate
supply
of
housing
is
available
to
meet
the
needs
of
Tampa
so
present
future
populations.
The
proposed
density
is
57
percent
of
the
anticipated
density
under
the
RS
I'm,
sorry,
R35
designation.
This
will
provide
opportunities
for
housing
at
slightly
higher
densities
than
the
surrounding
area,
which
is
supported
by
land
use
policies.
N
5.1.48.14.19.2.1
9.7.1
and
9.7.3
the
site
has
been
redesigned
to
provide
vehicular
access
from
the
alley.
Front
Door
entrances
are
oriented
to
Lemon
Street,
the
height
of
the
structure
has
been
reduced
from
three
stories
to
two
and
the
roof
pitch
has
been
redesigned
all
these
changes.
The
proposed
development,
as
shown
on
the
site
plan,
promote
and
encourage
development
that
is
appropriate
and
location,
character
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
The
design
is
designed
and
proposed.
Development
is
unique
and
therefore
is
the
need
of
waivers.
N
A
B
B
AE
Hussein
development
coordination-
it's
gonna
be
hard
to
follow
that
up,
but
there's
a
proposed
rezoning
from
PD
to
PD
place
of
religious
assembly
and
daycare
at
the
location,
6460
Tampa,
Palms,
Boulevard
I'm,
not
passing
along
to
our
Planning
Commission.
AD
Thank
you,
Zane
David,
Haye,
Planning
Commission
staff
I
have
been
sworn
we'll
move
up
to
the
new
Tampa
planning
district.
For
this
next
case
it
is
located
in
a
part
of
the
city.
There
is
no
Transit
up
in
this
part
of
Tampa
Compton
Park
is
the
nearest
public
recreation
facility.
Under
that
Suburban
mixed
use,
six
future
land
use
category,
it
does
fall
under
the
mixed
use,
quarter
policies.
So
there
are
specific
policy
Direction
within
the
plan
regarding
those
mixed-use
categories,
and
it
is
not
located
within
an
evacuation
Zone.
AD
AD
Here
we
have
the
future
land
use
map.
You
could
see
all
that
pink
is
that
Suburban
mix
26
and
then
the
green
is
the
natural
preservation
future
land
use
category
again.
It
is
under
that
smu6.
This
designation
is
typically
located
north
of
Fletcher
Avenue
and
supports
a
mixture
of
housing
types
and
limited
commercial
uses.
AD
The
PD
proposes
a
0.09
far,
which
is
approximately
19
of
the
Floria
ratio
that
can
be
considered
in
the
smu-6
Planning
Commission
staff
finds
that
the
proposed
uses
and
intensity
are
consistent
with
that
Suburban
development
pattern
anticipated
within
this
area
of
the
city
and
based
on
those
considerations
and
the
policies
provided
to
you
in
the
report.
Planning
Commission
staff
does
find
the
proposed
plan
development
consistent
with
the
provisions
of
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
Thank
you.
AE
AE
AE
If
you
keep
going
down
Tampa
Palms
Boulevard,
you'll
reach,
Bruce
B
downs
to
the
West
I
will
now
share
the
site
plan
provided
by
the
applicant.
AE
The
proposed
rezoning
is
for
an
expansion
of
a
current
of
a
current
rezoning
res
20-05.
The
current
zoning
of
res
20-05
is
for
a
place
of
religious
assembly
and
daycare.
The
current
site
has
one
existing
building
3396
square
feet,
and
this
proposed
rezoning
is
to
expand
that
to
a
12,
500
square
feet
and
add
additional
parking,
so
the
proposed
building
area
will
be
a
total
of
15
896
square
feet.
The
total
Site
Area
is
166,
802
square
feet,
vehicle
or
access
to
the
site,
as
she
comes
from
the
south
on
Tampa
Palms
Boulevard.
AE
The
proposed
parking
is
required
to
have
122
parking
spaces
and
the
applicant
is
proposing
142
parking
spaces.
The
proposed
maximum
height
is
35
feet
in
height.
AE
I
am
now
on
the
property
of
the
place
of
religious
assembly
and
you'll,
see
the
sign
and
building
that's.
Currently.
There.
AE
As
you
look
southeast
of
the
site,
Temple
Palms
Boulevard,
we
have
storm
water
ponds
and
then
you
have
more
residential
single
family.
Detached
upon
that.
AE
And
to
the
north
of
the
site,
you'll
see
the
Tico
power
lines.
AE
AE
The
development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
petition
and
finds
the
overall
request
to
be
consistent
with
the
Land
Development
code.
Should
it
be
the
pleasure
city
council
to
approve
the
application?
The
applicant
must
provide
revisions
to
the
revision
sheet
between
first
and
second
reading
I'm
here
for
any
questions.
Any.
AE
This
was
rezoning
back
in
2020
Rez
20-05.
Okay,
can
you
put.
A
A
No
other
addition
to
that
existing
area
there,
which
I
I
believe
is
for
day
school
or
something
like
that.
U
Good
evening,
Council
William
Malloy
325
South
Boulevard
Tampa
Florida
I'm,
here
very
proudly,
representing
LifeSong
Church
in
this
expansion
effort
for
the
existing
sanctuary
and
daycare
I
think
staff
provided
all
the
particulars
I,
don't
need
to
pair
it
in
any
of
that
again,
it's
a
simple
expansion
of
the
existing
facilities.
It's
a
significant
expansion
in
terms
of
what's
there
and
what
we're
asking
for,
but
in
terms
of
what's
allowed
and
what
we're
asking
for
we
are
at
about
19
of
the
allowable
density.
U
It's
a
beautiful
sight,
beautiful
lot,
it's
heavily
treed
I
think
the
grass
parking
is
more
than
appropriate.
I
hope
you
could
tell
that
a
bit
from
the
pictures.
It
really
fits
with
the
site
nicely
as
to
the
waivers
there's
the
parking,
and
we
do
unfortunately
have
to
take
one
tree
to
make
the
plan
work
I'm
certain
that
we're
doing
the
appropriate
compensation
for
that
with
that
I'd
like
to
add,
we
have
no
known
opposition
to
this
case.
The
sign's
been
up
for
a
while.
U
A
Q
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr
chairman
I
have
an
ordinance
rezoning
property
in
the
general
vicinity
of
64.60
Tampa
Palms
Boulevard
in
the
city
of
Tampa
Florida,
more
particularly
described
in
section
one
from
zoning,
District
classification,
PD
plan
development
to
PD
plan
development,
place
of
religious
assembly
and
daycare
providing
an
effective
date.
The
petitioner
has
shown
above
and
beyond,
let's
see
all
the
facts
and
evidence
that
would
support
this
and
the
consistency,
and
that
is
my
motion.
B
AD
Thank
you,
Zane
David,
Haye,
Planning,
Commission
staff
I
have
been
sworn.
We
moved
back
down
to
the
central
Tampa
planning
district
for
this
next
case.
The
subject
site
is
located
within
the
Palmetto
Beach
neighborhood
DeSoto
Park
is
the
closest
public
recreation
facility.
There
is
no
Transit
within
the
Palmetto
Beach
area
closest
is
up
toward
ibore
and
the
subject
site
is
located
within
the
coastal
High
Hazard
area.
It
is
also
within
the
coastal
planning
area
and
it
is
within
a
level
a
evacuation
Zone
onto
the
aerial.
AD
We
have
22nd
Street
right
here
and
then
Gordon
Street
is
on
the
North
22nd
Street
there's
a
mixture
of
some
residential,
some
commercial.
This
was
the
historic
kind
of
Main
Street
through
Palmetto
Beach,
until
the
port
constructed
an
improved
20th
Street
it
from
it's,
mostly
residential
from
22nd
Street
East,
22nd,
Street
West.
It's
a
mixture
of
light
Industrials,
some
remaining
residential
you've
got
warehousing,
and
then
you
go
into
the
heavy
industrial
uses
on
the
west
side
of
20th
Street.
Here
we
have
the
future
land
use
map.
AD
This
is
one
of
these
sites
that
has
two
future
land
use
categories,
the
the
properties
adjacent
to
it
along
20,
South,
22nd
Street
in
the
pink.
That's
that
Community
mixed
use
35
so
that
allows
up
to
CG
uses
consideration
the
red
directly
across
the
street.
That's
Community
commercial
35
that
allows
consideration
of
up
to
commercial
intensive
uses.
You
could
see
it.
It
goes
quickly
down
to
a
residential
10
pattern
and
this
tan
color
east
of
22nd
Street,
and
then
this
kind
of
reddish
color.
AD
That's
the
transitional
use
24
category,
that's
a
unique
category
within
the
city!
That's
really
designated
for
areas
that
predated
modern
planning,
so
it
has
a
quite
a
mix
of
uses
from
residential,
commercial
and
industrial
Light
industrial
uses
and
then
across
20th,
in
that
black
color
is
that
heavy
industrial
associated
with
the
port,
as
described
in
land
use
policy
6.1.13
the
lands
under
the
Community
mixtures,
35
designation,
are
considered
to
be
within
the
mixed
use
quarter,
so
those
mixed-use
Corridor
policies
do
apply
to
the
site.
AD
The
the
proposed
PD
does
allow
for
compatible
low
medium
scale,
development
that
will
provide
a
sensitive
transition
from
the
light
industrial
use,
the
south
and
east
of
the
site
to
the
single-family
detached
units
west
of
the
site.
AD
It
is
within
that
Coastal,
High,
Hazard
area
again,
and
the
applicant
is
required
to
work
with
the
city
of
Tampa
and
other
Regulatory
Agencies
to
ensure
that
any
residential
units
mitigate
for
the
impacts
on
shelter,
space
and,
in
conclusion,
the
proposed
PD
will
provide
new
housing
on
underutilized
land
and
will
provide
compatible
infill
development
for
the
pimental
beach
neighborhood.
So,
based
on
those
considerations
and
the
policies
provided
within
your
report,
the
Planning
Commission
staff
finds
plan
development
consistent
with
the
provisions
of
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan
and
I'm
available.
AE
As
you
see,
the
property
here
outlined
in
red
to
the
east
you'll
have
South
22nd
Street
to
the
West.
You'll
have
South
20th
Street
to
the
north,
you'll
have
Thrace
Street
and
to
the
South
you'll
have
Davis
Street
and
farther
to
the
West
you'll
have
the
bay
and
then
Channel
Side
that
runs
into
downtown
Tampa.
AE
The
proposery
zoning
is
for
nine
residential
single-family
attached
units.
As
you
see,
there
are
two
buildings,
three
continuous
units
and
then
six
continuous
units
here
in
the
second
building
the
subject
site
is
currently
vacant.
At
this
time
the
property
is
located
on
the
northeast
corner
of
22nd
Street
and
Gordon
Street.
As
you
see,
22nd
and
Gordon,
the
Celtic
site
contains
a
lot
area
of
16
741
square
feet.
AE
Vehicle
access
to
the
site
for
the
units
is
provided
from
alley
to
the
South,
which
comes
off
22nd
Street,
as
you
see,
22nd,
Street
and
then
the
alley
to
the
South
for
access
to
the
sites.
So
it's
two
cars
per
unit
and
then
also
there
are
two
spots
right
here:
surface
spots
between
the
two
buildings.
AE
AE
AE
AE
AE
AE
AE
Development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
petition
and
finds
the
overall
request
to
be
consistent
with
the
Land
Development
code
should
be
the
pleasure
of
city
council
to
approve
the
application.
The
applicant
must
provide
revisions
to
the
revision
sheet
between
first
and
second
reading
here
for
any
questions.
Any.
AE
V
Good
eating
Council,
Ralph,
Schuler,
2401,
North,
Harvard,
Avenue,
Tampa,
Florida
and
I
have
been
sworn
so
we're
all
familiar
with
Palmetto
Beach,
Palmetto,
Beach
transitional
area
of
many
different
uses,
obviously
predated
zoning.
We
have
just
around
this
particular
site:
commercial,
industrial,
residential,
multi-family,
residential,
all
all
scattered
within
close
proximity.
V
If
so,
for
he's,
he's
done
many
other
projects
within
the
city
and
that
this
project
would
be
again
really
two
two
buildings
and
the
nature
of
that
is
really
because
of
the
land
use
designation.
This
land
use
designation,
which
is
the
CMU
35,
and
then
the
current
lot
plotted
lot
of
transitional
use
24..
V
So
we
get
two
three-story
buildings.
V
Mainly
because
of
course,
we
are
in
a
evacuation
Zone
and
the
Planning
Commission
would
not
support
any
any
upzoning,
of
course,
and
we're
using
the
existing
land
use
designation.
The
first
floor
is
is
actually
just
all.
Storage
between
cars
and
and
regular
storage
FEMA
would
not
allow
us
to
do
that.
So
all
the
living
is
done
on
the
second
and
the
third
floor.
V
So
we
think
this
is
a
smart
and
and
compatible
way
to
bring
an
infill
into
a
neighborhood
that
badly
needs
it,
but
it's
also
in
an
a-zone
as
Mr
Hussein
suggested.
There
are
other
compatible
developments
nearby.
V
Our
our
development
I
think
would
fit
very
nicely
into
the
overall
fabric
of
the
neighborhood
I
want
to
quickly
address
our
one
waiver.
Our
one
waiver
is
really
on
22nd
Street,
which
is
typically
or
historically
a
Commercial
Street,
so
we
felt
comfortable
building
a
building
closer
to
the
street,
which
is
more
in
keeping
with
the
normal
pattern
of
commercial
development,
and
then
also,
if
you
see
here,
this
is
the
sidewalk,
it's
very
small.
We
would
improve
That
Sidewalk
to
a
larger
sidewalk,
but
currently
our
our
property
line
starts
here.
V
V
A
J
Residential
single-family
attached
provide
providing
an
effective
date
along
with
the
revision
sheet
and
finding
that
the
proposed
development
is
consistent
with
land
use,
policies,
2.1.2
and
housing
policies,
1.3.1
and
1.3.4,
which
encourages
compatible
infill
development
on
vacant
and
underutilized
land
and
compliant
with
Land
Development
code.
Section
27-136
that
the
proposed
development,
as
shown
on
the
site
plan,
promotes
and
encourages
development
that
is
appropriate
in
location,
character
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
Q
A
A
B
A
A
O
Number
nine
that
I
would
like
to
confirm,
though
it's
my
understanding
that
the
applicant
is
going
to
be
online,
virtually.
A
A
AF
O
AD
Hey
Planning
Commission
staff
I
have
been
sworn.
We
move
stay
in
the
central
Tampa
planning
district
for
this
next
case.
This
site
is
located
within
the
North
Hyde
Park
neighborhood
West
Pines
Park
is
the
closest
recreation
facility.
It's
about
one-fourth
of
a
mile
Northwest
of
the
subject
site
North
Armenia
Avenue
is
a
Transit
emphasis.
Corridor,
there
is
Transit
heart
routes,
14
serves
that
quarter
and
the
subject
site
is
within
an
evacuation,
Zone
C
onto
the
aerial
again
this
is
Armenia.
This
is
North
B.
AD
AD
Move
on
to
the
Future
land
use
map,
the
subject
site
and
all
the
properties
around
it,
and
the
brown
are
that
residential
20
future
land
use
category.
It
does
intensify,
as
you
get
over
to
Howard
Avenue
into
that
Community
mixed-use
35,
future
land
use
category
the
subject
site
since
it
is
located
within
that
residential
20.,
the
commercial
it
needs
to
it
needs
to
meet
commercial
locational
criteria.
AD
AD
It
is,
let's
see
it's
located
within
an
Urban
Village
and
there's
specific
policy
direction
for
that
in
the
plan.
So,
based
on
those
considerations
and
the
policies
provided
to
you
in
the
report,
the
Planning
Commission
staff
finds
a
proposed
rezone
and
consistent
with
the
provisions
of
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan
I'm
available.
If
you
have
any
questions.
Thank
you.
O
Any
Barnes
development
coordination,
the
quest
is
to
rezone
2323
West
North
B
Street
from
rm16
residential,
multiple
family
to
CN
commercial
neighborhood.
The
property
is
located
at
the
northeast
corner.
I'm
gonna
show
up
my
screen
in
the
red
northeast
corner
of
West
North
B
Street
in
North
Armenia
Avenue.
It's
comprised
of
lot
7
of
a
subdivision
platted
in
1907.,
probably
surrounding
the
site,
is
either
zoned.
Rm18
rm16
or
plan
development
and
developed
with
a
commercial
use
commercial
uses.
O
O
The
subject
property
is
located
within
West
Tampa
overlay
and,
if
approved,
CN,
zoning
allows
for
commercials
uses
such
as
a
clinic
business,
professional,
Office,
restaurant
or
retail
sales.
Although
the
subject
lot
does
not
meet
minimum
lot
width,
it
is
applied
a
lot
of
record
in
the
West
Tampa
overlay
and
therefore
can
be
considered
for
this.
Rezoning
staff
therefore
finds
the
request
consistent
and
I'm,
going
to
show
you
some
pictures
of
the
site.
O
O
A
Any
questions
for
Miss
Barnes,
thank
you,
Mr
Shelby,
out
of
an
abundance
of
caution
and
to
be
transparent.
This
property
was
rented
out
by
a
former
girlfriend
of
mine.
I
had
never
met
the
owners
so
I'm
just
wanting
to
let
everybody
know
that
I've
had
no
communication
with
the
owners
at
all.
Q
L
A
A
B
Thank
you.
Do
you
swear
or
affirm
the
testimony
you're
about
to
give
is
the
truth
and
nothing,
but
the
truth
I
had
to
thank
you.
You
may
Lord
your
hand.
Thank.
A
AF
Well
is
bordered
on
both
sides
by
a
commercial,
it
has
a
beauty
shop
in
front
of
it.
It
has
a
lawyer's
office
in
back
of
it,
and
the
street
Armenia
has
become
quite
commercial
in
the
businesses.
That's
on
the
street,
and
at
this
time
we
would
like
to
see
it
change
from
residential
to
commercial.
AB
S
A
K
The
proposaling
zoning
district
will
allow
for
compatible
development
with
the
surrounding
area
and
will
not
alter
the
character
development
pattern,
along
with
Howard
Avenue
in
North
Armenia
Avenue
consistent
with
land
use
policy,
1.2.8.
A
J
B
O
AD
Thank
you,
David,
hey
finding
commission
staff
I
have
been
sworn.
We
end
the
night
in
the
central
Tampa
planning
district.
More
specifically
the
West
Tampa
Urban
Village,
the
subject
site
is
located
within
a
mixed
use,
Corridor,
as
defined
by
the
comprehensive
plan.
Villa
brothers
Park
is
the
closest
public
recreation
facility.
AD
There
is
Transit
on
North,
Howard,
Avenue
and
the
subject
site
is
located
with
an
evacuation
Zone
C
on
to
the
Ariel,
we're
just
to
the
east
of
where
we
were
on
the
last
case,
which
was
over
here
now
we're
this
is
Howard
Avenue,
and
this
is
North
A
Street
to
the
South
there's
an
alley
to
the
north.
This
is
mostly
non-residential
development.
This
is
the
TD
Bank
at
the
corner
of
Howard
and
Kennedy.
AD
There
is
mostly
single-family
detached
up
here.
There
are
some
duplexes
and
some
missing
middle
multi-family,
also
located
on
North
B
on
to
the
Future
land
use
map,
the
subject
site
and
the
properties
to
the
north.
The
South
well
basically,
surrounding
it
are
all
within
the
community
mixtures
35
future
land
use
category.
It
gets
more
intensive
down
near
Kennedy.
This
is
the
urban
mixed
u60
and
then
to
the
northwest
of
the
subject
site.
That's
the
residential
20.
future
land
use
category.
AD
In
that
brown
color,
the
PD
proposes
a
.3
far,
which
is
below
the
allowed
far
the
site
can
be
considered
under
that
Community
mixed
use,
35
designation
that
goes
up
to
a
two
far
is
the
maximum.
AD
The
the
site
is
located
within
a
mixed-use
corridor
that
it,
the
building
design,
has
has
implemented
a
number
of
the
policy
directions
from
the
comprehensive
plan
to
create
a
more
urban
character.
The
Planning
Commission
staff
does
find
that
there
that
the
request
will
not
alter
the
character
of
the
surrounding
area
and
is
comparable
and
compatible
with
this
portion
of
the
West
Tampa
Urban
Village
and
based
on
those
considerations.
The
Planning
Commission
staff
finds
a
proposed
plan
development
consistent
with
the
provisions
of
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
That's
it
for
me
and
I'm
available.
O
You
any
Barnes
development
formation.
Again.
This
request
is
Rez
2311
to
resume
from
CG
to
PD
from
medical
office.
The
applicant
is
requesting
one
waiver
to
reduce
a
vua
buffer.
The
property
is
located
at
214,
North
Howard
Avenue,
subject,
site
about
0.2
acres
and
is
located
Southwest
of
the
intersection
of
North
Howard
Avenue
Northwest
West
West
North,
B,
Street,
you're
upside
down.
L
O
The
applicant
is
requesting
approximately
a
22
150
square
foot.
Building
for
a
medical
office.
Principal
building
setback
service
follows
West,
74
feet,
South
three
feet:
north
three
feet
and
East
three
feet
proposed:
maximum
height
is
20
feet,
14
parking
spaces
are
required
and
provided
vehicular
Ingress
sneakers
is
provided
Vienna
alley
from
North,
Howard
Avenue
and
again.
This
is
where
that
vua
buffer
is
requested.
Adjacent
to
the
right-of-way
overall
development
coordination
staff
finds
the
proposed
medical
office.
Use
is
similar
in
nature
to
the
existing
development
pattern
and
surrounding
area.
O
Overall
development
review
and
client
staff
did
find.
It
consist
inconsistent
based
on
natural
resources
that
natural
resources
requested
waiver.
However,
development
coordination
acknowledges
that
Ali's
historically
hide
the
unattractive
functions
of
society,
so
whether
it
be
garage
access
or
solid
waste
removal.
So.
O
O
J
This
is
already
commercial
General.
Isn't
medical
office
already
allowed
under
this?
That
is
correct,
then
I'm
confused
as
to
why
they
need
a
PD
they're.
V
Good
evening
Ralph
Schuler,
2401,
North,
Howard
Avenue,
so
simple
little
project,
commercial,
surrounded
by
commercial,
it's
the
existing
building
would
be
demolished
and
and
a
new
brand
new
small
medical
office,
which,
which
will
be
much
improved
over
the
current
condition,
would
be
established.
V
We
were
encouraged
by
staff
to
be
able
to
get
the
the
parking
that
we
needed
to
to
to
to
apply
for
a
PD,
so
the
site
plan.
Essentially,
this
is
the
existing
alley.
We
would
improve
that
Alley
we're
using
the
alley
exactly
the
same
way.
The
property
to
the
north
is
currently
using
it,
which
is
parking
from
the
stocks
from
the
beginning
of
the
site.
All
the
way
back.
V
The
all
the
only
waiver
we're
really
asking
for
is
is
this
waiver,
which
is
a
parking
waiver
when
you
can't
ride
a
buffer
if
you're
parking
on
the
Alley,
which
is
again
allowed,
we
provide
as
much
green
space
as
possible,
but
we
are
deficient
on
green
space
But,
as
this
is
also
an
urban
mixed
use
or
Urban
type
development
that
the
surrounding
areas
also
have
similar
and
more
compatible
densities.
Of
course,
our
density
is
very
low.
V
V
Are
are,
building
has
a
little
front
porch,
it
has
again
tries
to
be
kind
of
neo,
traditional
compatible
to
other
structures
up
and
down
Howard
Avenue,
and
we
feel
that
it's
a
quality
project
again.
This
is
this
is
the
is
that
is
the
alley
as
it
currently
stands.
We
would
improve
the
alley
and
you
can
see
the
parking
directly
to
the
north.
V
This
is
the
subject
site
and
we
would.
We
would,
of
course,
remove
this
curb
cut
and
rework
and
redo
the
sidewalk
and
improve
the
alley
and
all
all
of
our
solid
waste
and
everything
is
has
been
approved.
V
Everyone
finds
the
project
compatible,
the
the
only
issues
are
because
of
natural
resources
and
I
understand
their
their
concerns,
but
I
I
think
we've
tried
to
overcome
them
as
best
we
can,
but
this
is
a
a
I
think,
a
a
more
urban
contextual
site
and
not
a
not
something
that
we
can
provide
all
of
that
green
space.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
Happy
for
questions.
Any
questions.
A
F
Development
does
not
alter
the
character
of
the
surrounding
area
and
is
compatible
and
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
portion
of
the
West
Ham
Urban
Village
consistent
in
land
use
policy,
5.1.2
and
5.1.4.
The
proposed
development
shown
is
the
site
plan,
promotes
and
encourages
development.
That
is
an
appropriate
and
location.
Carriage
and
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood
proposes
use,
promotes
the
officious,
the
efficient
and
sustainable
use
of
land
and
infrastructure.
A
B
Q
First
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
that
I
guess
the
request
would
go
to
Parks
and
Rec
that
we
recognize
or
do
some
kind
of
recognition
in
a
form
of
a
plaque.
Something
small
I
know:
there's
going
to
be
a
dog
park,
other
things
something
for
Sandy
Sanchez
for
her
tireless
work
for
the
not
just
the
neighborhood,
but
for
Vila
Brothers
Park,
actually
a
little
bit
of
everything,
she's
very,
very
involved,
and
she
dedicates
so
much
of
her
time
in
service
to
her
community
and
I'd
like
for
us
to
do
something.
A
We
have
a
motion
made
by
councilman
Maniscalco
seconded
by
councilman
councilwoman,
her
attack
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye.
Any
opposed
motion
passes.
Q
Then
I
have
it
no
just
I
can
I
can
follow
up
with
Parks
and
Rec
yeah
and
then
I
have
four
motions.
This
is
from
the
Planning
Commission
number
one:
a
request
by
the
Planning
Commission
setting
adoption
hearings
from
tacpa
23-02
tacpa,
23
23-03
and
tacpa
23-04
on
May
5th,
May
25th
2023
at
501
pm
and
direct
the
legal
department
to.
A
A
Q
A
Q
Q
N
Yeah,
quick
one
as
I've
talked
to
police
officers.
One
of
the
things
that
they
say
worries
them
is
that
people
inside
the
city
have
access
to
their
body,
cam
footage
and
they
don't
know
who's
looking
at
it,
and
so
they
would
like
us
to
enable
them
to
look
at
the
audit
of
who's
looked
at
their
body.
Cam
footage,
so
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
have
staff
return
on
May
4th
to
report
on.
A
We're
motion
made
by
councilman
Carlson
seconded
by
councilman,
Goose,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
any
opposed.
That's
an
Ocean
passes.
Thank
you
and
I
have
nothing
receiving
file
we'll
move.
We
have
a
motion
to
receive
a
fireball
councilman
manascotra
seconded
by
second
by
councilman
Carlson,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
is
there
any
opposed
motion
passes.