►
From YouTube: TCC PM 9/28/23
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
D
B
B
Okay,
just
a
couple
of
housekeeping
items:
here
we
received
a
an
email
requesting
that
item
number
seven
be
continued
to
December
14th.
That
is
item
number
seven.
We
have
a
request
to
continue
that
item
to
December
14th.
B
B
We
have
a
motion
from
council
member
Miranda
to
remove
it
second
councilwoman
Henderson,
all
in
favor
I
any
opposed,
and
we
have
a
request
to
take
item
number
eight.
First,
it
will
not
take
very
long
and
then
we'll
continue
with
the
rest
of
the
agenda.
Anything
else
Mr
Mr
Hussein
do
I,
did
I
get
it
all.
H
Ma'am
good
evening,
Council
Melissa
Dickens
Planning
Commission
staff
could
I
have
the
Elmo
please
thank
you
and
I
do
appreciate
the
change
to
the
agenda.
I
have
my
eight-year-old
with
me.
So
thank
you
for
hearing
this
item
first.
So
the
one
change
to
the
schedule
that
was
in
your
packets.
We
received
this
schedule
prior
to
the
formal
budget
being
adopted,
so
we
did
receive
an
updated
schedule
of
projects
from
the
city
budget
office.
H
I
have
copies
for
the
clerk
I'm
happy
to
provide
copies
to
you
all
as
well,
but
I
do
want
to
call
your
attention
to
the
one
change
it
was.
The
there
is
a
a
change
to
increase
the
amount
of
Street
resurfacing
by
about
$5
million.
There
were
other
projects
that
were
in
the
CIP
that
that
are
not
part
of
the
scheduled
projects,
so
those
did
not
change
as
part
of
this
amendment,
but
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
note
for
the
record.
Thank
you
very
much
again.
H
This
is
your
fy2
24
through
FY
28,
Capital
Improvement,
section
schedule
of
projects
update.
This
is
a
routine
annual
update.
We
come
before
you
each
year
to
share
those
projects
that
affect
level
of
service.
It's
a
state
statutory
requirement
to
include
these
in
your
comprehensive
plan.
H
Okay,
the
again
this
is
required
by
chapter
163.
It
is
required.
Projects
are
identified
to
reflect
an
adopted
level
of
service,
those
projects
that
eliminated
deficiency,
maintain
level
of
service
or
serve
future
growth.
This
update
is
accomplished
by
ordinance
again,
the
schedule
was
updated
to
reflect
the
adopted
Capital
Improvement
program.
H
This
shows
the
CIS
schedule
of
projects
and
the
funding
amounts
you
can
see.
There
are
a
total
of
105
projects
that
were
found
to
affect
a
level
of
service.
This
is
not
your
full
CIP
this.
These
are
just
the
projects
that
affect
the
level
of
service
and
the
total
amount
with
that
modification
is
approximately
$1.5.
H
Billion
this
chart
shows
the
priorities
by
type
you
can
see
their.
The
largest
amount
is
for
replacement
and
deficiency.
H
That
is
consistent
with
Comprehensive
plan
policy,
and
then
there
are
also
smaller
amounts
to
address
efficiency,
replacement
and
future
need
future
need
and
deficiency
in
replacement,
Planning
Commission
staff
reviewed
the
proposed
schedule
of
projects
with
the
policies
within
the
comprehensive
plan
found
that
the
policies
were
consistent
with
Coastal
management,
objective,
1.,
4
and
1
policy
1.4.1,
which
is
about
limiting
projects
in
the
coastal
High
Hazard
area,
also
consistent
with
Capital
Improvements,
section,
objective,
1.3
and
policy
1.3.2
the
CIS
schedule
priorities
and
then
the
various
projects
are
consistent
and
further.
H
The
specific
subsections
that
pertain
to
infrastructure
and
your
recommendation.
Your
Planning
Commission
found
the
FY
24
through
FY
28
CIS
schedule
of
projects
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
I
M
Wells
can
I
put
you
on
the
spot
right
away
and
thank
you
for
filling
in
tonight.
Just
so
the
public
knows-
and
we
know
and
you're
going
to
hear
me
ask
this
question
a
lot
based
on
what
we've
been
through
the
last
few
weeks.
But
all
we're
doing
tonight
is
voting
to
put
it
in
the
comprehensive
plan.
We're
not
voting
on
or
endorsing
any
of
the
underlying
projects.
Is
that
correct.
A
A
B
D
C
J
One
good
evening,
council
members,
David
Hay
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff.
Let's
zoom
in
here
are
you
seeing
this?
Yes,
all
right!
It's
not
coming
up
this
first
plan
Amendment
future
land
use
map.
Amendment
is
TPA
2307,
it's
located
at
307,
North,
Westland,
Avenue
and
2
2,19
2,111
and
2,113
West
North
Beast
Street.
The
request
is
a
it's
privately
initiated
small
scale.
It's
approximately
63
Acres
this.
Currently
the
adopted
future
land
use
is
residential,
20
and
the
applicant
is
seeking
to
go
to
the
neighborhood
mixed
use.
J
35
future
land
use
category.
Here
we
have
a
general
location
of
it
of
the
subject.
Site
is
located
within
the
central
Tampa
planning
district,
more
specifically
the
West
Tampa
Urban
Village,
and
also
the
North
Hyde
Park
neighborhood.
J
Here's
an
aerial
of
the
subject
site
it's
outlined
in
yellow
North
B
Street,
is
on
the
south.
North
Westland
is
on
the
Western
Property
boundary.
This
particular
area
is:
has
a
mixture
of
residential
housing,
type
single
family,
detached
and
duplexes,
some
old,
missing
middle
type,
multif
family
housing,
more
commercial
and
office
development
is
found,
West
toward
North
Howard
and
the
commercial
is
to
the
South
along
Kennedy.
Here's
some
photos
of
the
subject
site
we're
looking
East
toward
the
subject
site
we're
on
North
Westland
Avenue.
J
Here
we're
looking
West
from
the
subject
site
across
North
Westland
Avenue
toward
308
North
Westland.
Here
we're
looking
we're
still
on
Westland
Avenue
we're
looking
West
and
Northwest
of
the
C
site
here
we're
looking
West
directly
across
the
street
toward
this
multifam
at
304,
North,
Westland
Avenue.
Now
we're
looking
North
toward
20111
and
20113
West
North
B
Street.
These
are
all
part
of
the
subject
site
and
then
we're
looking
North
here
toward
2,15
West
North
Beast
Street.
This
is
also
the
subject
site.
J
Here's
the
currently
adopted
future
land
use
map,
the
subject,
site
and
properties
to
the
north,
east
and
south.
All
within
that
light,
brown
are
the
residential
20
directly
across
the
street
across
Westland.
In
this
pink
is
the
community
mixed
use.
35
future
land
use
category
further
south.
J
As
you
get
down
to
North
a
this
goes
up
to
the
residential
35
and
the
darker
brown,
this
kind
of
lavender
color,
that's
the
urban
mix
to
60
along
Kennedy,
and
then
the
single
family,
detached
in
the
residential
10
in
in
the
tan
color,
is
basically
from
gry
Street
north.
You
do
have
some
Community
commercial
35,
located
kind
of
to
the
Northwest
along
Howard.
J
Avenue:
here's
the
request
under
that
neighborhood
mixed
use,
35
future
land
use
category.
J
Currently,
under
the
existing
residential
20,
a
maximum
of
12
dwelling
units
or
13,000
little
over
13,000
Square
fet
of
non-residential
uses
can
be
considered
on
site
under
the
proposed
neighborhood
mixed
use.
35
the
density
goes
up
to
a
potential
of
22
dwelling
units
with
a
maximum
of
41,000
Square
ft
of
non-residential
or
residential.
J
Depending
on
you
can
use
the
square
footage.
It
would
also
introduce
limited
currently
under
the
residential
20.
They
can
be
considered
for
neighborhood
commercial
uses
based
on
Commercial
locational
criteria
under
the
neighborhood
mixed
use,
35
that
commercial
Lo
locational
criteria
goes
away
and
they
could
be
considered
for
limited
General
commercial
uses.
J
Those
can
those
limited,
General
commercial
uses
can
be
considered.
The
full
range
of
General
commercial
uses
can
be
considered
in
the
community
mixed
use
35
directly
across
the
street.
So
this
is
a
this
category
is
basically
a
step
down
from
that
Community
mix
use
35.
We
sent
these
out
to
our
partner
agencies
and
the
only
agency
that
had
a
comment
was
the
school
board.
J
Both
Wilson
middle
and
plant
high
schools
have
been
identified
as
overc
capacity
at
this
time,
and
this
is
just
an
analysis
for
adequate
facilities
only
and
is
not
a
determination
of
school
concurrency.
A
school
concurrency
review
will
be
issued
prior
to
preliminary
PL
or
site
plan
approval.
That's
handled
more.
The
zoning
your
Planning
Commission
did
review
this
and
did
find
it
consistent
with
three
main
areas
of
policy.
Within
the
comprehensive
plan.
There
are
a
number
of
policies
that
deal
with
the
promotion
of
densities
that
support
Transit.
J
There
is
Transit
located
over
on
Howard
and
more
Transit
down
on
Kennedy
Boulevard.
Your
Planning
Commission
did
find
that
it
was
consistent
with
those
policies
that
support
that
density.
The
promotion
of
infill
there's
a
lot
of
these
sites.
You
saw
that
currently
most
of
the
site
is
vacant.
J
Besides
a
single
family
detached
on
the
south,
there
are
policies
within
the
comprehensive
plan
that
support
the
infill,
especially
within
areas
close
to
employment
and
Transit,
and
then
your
Planning
Commission
did
find
it
consistent
with
Coastal
management
policy
1.2.5
that
deals
with
development
within
the
coastal
planning
area.
The
site
is
within
that
Coastal
planning
area.
So,
based
on
that,
the
Planning
Commission
does
recommend
to
you
this
evening
that
the
proposed
map
Amendment
be
found
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
tamper,
comprehensive
plan.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
I'm
available.
K
Yes,
good
evening,
Isabelle
Albert
with
half
and
I'm
here
with
Billy
Malloy,
our
L's
attorney
on
behalf
of
the
applicant,
so
just
very
quickly
David
hey
did
go
through.
You
know
the
location
of
the
area.
I,
don't
know.
If
you
can
see
this.
K
K
There
are
some
concerns
about
the
intensity
of
the
CM
u35,
and
that
is
how
we
ended
up
and
the
reason
why
we
wanted
the
cm35
is
because
you
can
calculate
density
on
the
square
footage,
and
that
was
definitely
helping
us
do
a
better
project
better
product
there
and
with
discussion
we
reduced
it
to
the
U
neighborhood
mix,
use.
K
35
to
Mr
Haye
showed
you
a
couple
of
development
around
the
property,
but
the
what
we're
requesting
is
a
is
a
two-story
multif
family
development
at
this
corner.
This
is
not
the
first
development
in
the
area
just
to
the
north
of
the
site.
This
is
an
old
two-story,
multif
family
development
and
we
kind
of
looked
at
that
to
help
us
guide
to
do
what
we
wanted
to
do
on
our
site
and
across
the
street.
There's
another
two-story
multif
family
development.
So
the
corner
is
going
to.
K
You
know
we're
going
we're
just
doing
this
infield
of
the
multif
family
development
at
that
corner.
There
was
also
con
concerns
with
the
neighborhood
association
we
met
with
them.
They
didn't
have
a
problem
with
the
project
because
we
showed
them
what
we
wanted
to
do,
but
there
were
some
concerns
about
the
intensity
that
introducing
commercial
to
the
site.
Mr
hay
said
site
can
currently
be
allowed
with
commercial
uses.
K
As
long
as
you
meet
the
commercial
location
criteria
with
this
category,
you
wouldn't
have
to
do
that,
but
you
cannot
forget
that
if
ever
we
come
in
to
do
any
kind
of
a
development
proposal,
we
have
to
come
in
through
a
zoning
again.
Our
site
currently
is
not
zoned
for
this,
and
therefore
there's
going
to
be
an
opportunity
for
staff
and
the
public
to
take
a
look
at
this
and
raise
their
concerns.
We
did
show
them
what
we
wanted
to
do:
we're
ready
to
file
with
with
a
multif
family.
K
You
know
two-story
development
and
you
know
we
went
to
the
Planning
Commission
and
they
recommended
support
and
I'm
here.
If
you
have
any
questions,
councilwoman
her.
L
I
actually
have
a
question
for
legal
generally.
We
are
not
supposed
to
be
talking
about
the
plans
for
this
correct.
We
we're
really
just
talking
about
the
zoning
and
we
should
not
be.
We
should
not
be
hearing
about
the
plans
for
the
site
am
I,
correct,
Susan,.
M
L
K
Well,
the
highest
and
best
dues
for
the
comp
plan.
Again,
it's
you
know
that
commercials
concern
was
the
commercial
at
at
this
site.
If
anybody
wanted
to
come
in
through
the
commercial
would
have
to
come
in
through
the
process
again
to
request
that
does,
does
it
mean
that
it's
guaranteed
or
it's
a
given,
that's
going
to
be
built
for
that
and
the
the
reason
why
we
ask
for
that.
Classification
is
to
allow
to
use
a
square
footage
to
have
a
better
product,
and
it's
it's
in
harmony
with
the
neighborhood
I.
B
N
Sounds
good
Carlos,
Ramirez
I'm,
the
president
of
the
North
High
Park
civic
association,
I,
am
here
today
representing
the
community.
We
are
against,
as
mentioned
against
this
change
to
the
comprehensive
plan.
West
Tampa,
this
West
Tampa
neighborhood,
has
been
around
since
1895
and
in
its
time
we've
seen
it
ups
and
downs
like
every
other
neighborhood
in
Tampa.
Lately
we
have
seen
people
coming
back
to
the
neighborhood
and
seeing
what
we
see
in
the
neighborhood,
which
is
the
great
location
and
the
potential
that
it
can
be.
N
We
are
seeing
a
lot
of
young
families
move
into
the
neighborhood,
with
kids
we're
seeing
an
increase
in
pedestrian
traffic
of
kids,
walking
to
Mitchell
Elementary
and
Wilson
Middle
School
riding
their
bikes
like,
like
my
son,
does,
and
we
we
are
happy
with
that.
We
want
people
to
come
into
our
neighborhood
and
and
enjoy
all
the
all
the
things
that
it
has.
We
have
seen
some
density
come
into
the
neighborhood
and
we've
welcomed
it
and
it's
been
fine.
N
The
large
developments
that
have
come
into
our
neighborhood
have
been
on
the
arterials
that
are
surrounding
our
neighborhood,
which
we
think
that
is
responsible
growth.
We
have
seen
a
Resurgence
of
people
coming
into
the
area
and-
and
that
makes
sense
why
we
want
to
have
some
development
in
this
site,
as
shown
by
the
staff,
is
surrounded
by
existing
residential
uses.
It's
also
along
local
streets.
N
The
growth
in
our
neighborhood
has
concentrated
on
Howard,
Kennedy,
Rome
and
Willow,
and,
as
reported
the
north
east
and
south
have
future
R20
uses,
which
would
increase
the
density
without
affecting
the
area
and
also
act
as
a
buffer
between
the
higher
density
along
Howard
and
Kennedy.
Again
responsible
growth.
We
are
okay
with
more
folks
moving
to
the
area,
especially
since
there
is
a
housing
shortage,
but
with
NMU
35.
N
We
also
have
that
mixed
use
commercial
aspect
that
comes
with
it
and
if
more
density
is
needed,
then
perhaps
an
R35
land
use
would
be
more
better
for
this,
with
or
without
bonus,
Provisions
I
know,
one
of
the
bonus
Provisions
is
affordable
housing
and
we
feel
by
using
that
you
can
have
the
same
amount
of
dwelling
units,
which
is
what
residential
goes
by
as
an
NMU
35
and
without
the
commercial
aspect.
N
We
feel
this
land
use
category
will
not
only
bring
us
more
housing
units,
but
also
for
us
from
the
less
intense
residential
uses
on
the
other
side
inside
the
neighborhood
staff
may
want
to
provide
more
information.
I
know,
I,
have
discussed
this
with
Mr
hay.
Approving
the
NMU
land
use
change
will
set
a
precedence
for
the
neighborhood,
as
it
will
open
the
door
for
higher
uses
to
occur
outside
of
the
roads
that
can
service
them
and
drastically
change.
N
The
landscape
and
characteristics
of
the
neighborhood
using
the
R35
would
accomplish
three
things:
protect
the
neighborhood
against
the
wrong
type
of
development,
increase,
the
housing
inventory
and
also
buffer
the
residential
core.
From
of
the
neighborhood
for
more
intense
and
dense
uses,
we
have
met
with
a
developer
and
their
team,
and
we
have
seen
their
concept
we
like
it,
but
we
are
here
for
the
land,
use
change
or,
more
importantly,
the
potential
land
uses.
This
change
may
result
in
and
we
ask
you
to
say
no.
B
O
Name
good
evening
thanks:
my
name
is
Santiago
Martinez
and
I
am
a
home
homeowner
on
the
Block,
where
the
development
is
taking
place.
As
Carlos
mentioned,
we
are
not
opposed
to
development
occurring
on
site.
However,
what
we
are
opposed
to
is
the
change
to
mix
use
I
believe
that
it's
more
Falls
in
line
with
the
neighborhood
to
to
keep
the
land
used
as
residential
and
that
just
because
the
maximum
potential,
as
we
were
discussing
earlier
of
the
site
of
the
land
use
designation,
just
creates
too
much.
O
It's
too
broad
is
my
is
my
belief.
So
for
that
reason,
I
ask
that
you
reject
the
proposal.
B
A
Thank
you
Council.
We
have
a
speaker
waiver
form,
Nicole
Leon,
I
apologize.
Thank
you,
Jerome
adock!
Thank
you
and
Adrien
laramy.
Thank
you.
So
that's
an
additional
three
minutes.
P
Can
I
wait
till
the.
P
Time
good
evening,
city
council,
my
name
is
Sandy
De,
Diego,
Sanchez
and
I
live
at
2705
West,
fig
Street
in
the
Armory
Gardens
Community,
which
is
directly
to
the
west
of
northride
Park
I.
Here
as
a
good
neighbor,
again,
you're
asked
to
make
a
land
use
decision
without
a
site
plan.
Please
think
about
that.
On
page,
one
is
reputation.
Overview
of
the
north
H
hide
Park.
Community
urban
planners
couldn't
have
planned
an
urban
V
Village
more
perfectly.
P
The
north
side
of
North
hard
Park
borders
on
Cyprus,
which
has
Light
Industry
and
the
green
spine
bicycle
trail.
The
side
of
the
community
between
Fremont
and
Willow
is
mainly
condos
and
town
homes
and
has
many
amen.
Ities.
The
comprehens
and
plan
calls
for
including
vertical
density.
The
south
side
of
North
p
park
is
boarded
by
the
Kennedy
Boulevard
business
overlay,
teaming
with
commercial
properties
within
the
north
Hy
Park
Community,
an
area
that
Planning
Commission
staffers
fail
to
acknowledge
in
their
report.
P
At
best
of
all
North
HDE
park
has
sidewalks
that
lead
to
all
these
amenities
to
restaurants,
gym
even
a
vet.
It's
a
well
balanced
community
Community.
Recently,
the
neighborhood
met
with
the
developer
for
for
and
discussed
their
plans.
The
developers
of
the
project
proposed
excuse
me
met
with
a
small
segment
of
the
community.
The
asper
as
developer.
Excuse
me
bad
cold.
The
de
developer
is
asking
for
a
change
in
land
use
which
would
be
a
disaster
for
this
balanced
Urban
Village.
P
The
community
is
not
opposed
to
the
20
units,
but
is
alarmed
with
a
quest
for
a
change
in
land
use
that
is
not
necessary,
especially
since
the
project
can
be
easily
accomplished
with
an
R35
or
maybe
even
an
R50
land
use
change.
Why
Planning
Commission
staff
did
not
me
mention.
This
leaves
one
to
pause
and
question.
The
nm35
change
carries
with
it:
CG
commercial
General
designations,
even
though
the
de
developer
says
he
does
not
plan
to
use
the
CG
for
this
property.
P
The
developer
cannot
commit
for
future
land
owners
if
they
sell
the
NMU
CG
will
go
with
the
sale.
Property
is
sometimes
sold
before
the
conection
or
site
plans
are
even
completed.
Please
keep
this
in
mind.
If
you
Pro
choose
to
approve
the
change
in
land
use,
the
new
zoning
will
set
a
precedent.
You
know
as
well
as
I
do
that
other
developers
will
get
a
hint
of
this
rezoning
and
they
will
descend
on
this
neighborhood
like
vultures.
Again,
the
neighborhood
is
not
against
the
project,
but
against
the
land.
Use
change.
P
Please
see
the
maps.
The
comprehens
plan
folks
have
provided
you
on
page
two
and
three
on
page
two.
You
will
see
the
homes
that
are
directly
to
the
West,
even
though
it
is
CMU
35,
CMU
35,
it
is
residential.
I
tried
to
make
them
large
enough.
So
you
could
see
this.
The
parcels
with
the
potential
commercial
General
will
not
complete
this
a
complement
this
area
or
this
community.
P
The
land
use
change,
is
not
consistent
with
part
of
the
neighborhood
again
the
Planning
Commission
staff
has
picked
and
chosen
the
land
use,
objectives
and
goals
that
fit
this
particular
situation.
On
page
four
I
list
you
some
in
some
land
use
code,
which
shows
that
this
is
inconsistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
land
use
policy,
1.2.1
7
ensure
that
the
zoning
code
reinforces
quality,
Urban
Design
as
it
relates
to
the
context
of
this
area.
Land
use
9.5.3
limit.
P
B
Q
Minutes
hi,
my
name
is
Rachel
Fox
and
I
live
on
Albany,
so
the
Land
Development
I
share
that
Alleyway
and
there
are
some
fire
hazards
that
I've
already
experienced
due
to
the
extra
traffic
somebody
hit.
A
pole
ripped
off
the
electric
could
have
been
a
fire
hazard
and
then
the
debris
that
gets
piled
up
behind
there.
It
caught
fire
and
almost
caught
my
house
on
fire.
So
I
do
have
those
concerns
as
well.
There's
also
a
a
funeral
home.
That's
located
right.
Q
There
they're
already
using
up
the
the
streets
for
parking.
Excuse
me
and
then,
when
you
have
extra
parking
excuse
me
Apartments
you're,
going
to
start
having
more
street
parking
dedicated
to
those
residents,
as
well
as
the
the
funeral
home
business.
So
it
could
also
negatively
impact
that
as
well
so
I'm
opposed.
B
R
William
Malloy
325
South
Boulevard
Tampa
Florida
for
the
applicant
just
for
the
council's
edification.
We
did
very
carefully
look
at
every
30
district
and
above
to
see
what
fit
this
project
we
worked
with
the
Planning
Commission
to
make
sure
that
we
minimize
any
commercial
impacts
or
commercial
potential,
because
that's
not
what
we're
chasing
here
I
know,
that's
not
relevant.
That
is
not
what
we're
chasing
here.
Nm35
Works
R35
does
not
work.
R35
is
actually
R30
and
then
we
have
to
give
you
money
for
units
after
that.
Nmu
is
perfect.
R
For
this
we
realize
that
a
land
use
change
is
a
bit
of
a
boogeyman
to
the
neighborhood
because,
as
it's
been
stated,
it's.
R
Are
there
they
can
be
used
inappropriately
or
appropriately
what
I
told
the
association?
What
I
firmly
believe
is?
We
have
to
come
back
with
a
PD
for
whatever
we
do
here
and
we
trust
you
to
make
a
good
decision
on
that
PD.
You
trust
us
to
bring
you
a
good
product
we're
going
to,
and
hopefully
we
just
have
faith
in
that
process.
That's
what
we're
asking
for
here.
We
want
to
bring
you
a
good
project
after
this.
D
J
You
David
Hay
Planning
Commission
staff.
Just
give
me
one
moment
to
pull
up
the
resolution.
J
Yeah
it's
on
it's
on
page
13,
there
were
two
planning
Commissioners
absent.
Commissioner,
Bernstein
and
buzzer
were
absent
at
the
time
of
vote,
but
the
the
planning
Commissioners
that
were
in
attendance,
one
two
3
four
five,
six
seven
eight
total
were
in
favor
of
the
amendment.
J
J
They
heard
us
in
those
concerns
about
the
community
mixed
use,
35
and
it
was
staff's
recommendation
for
the
NMU
35,
because
really
looking
at
planning,
usually
having
a
dist
Street
divided
down
the
middle
with
a
land
use
category
is
not
usually
an
ideal
situation,
because,
usually
you
you
look
at
transitions
in
land
use
at
the
rear
of
through
alleys
or
things
like
that.
But
the
interface
was
interfacing
with
that
Community
mixed
use,
35
so
staff
and
the
Planning
Commission
thought
that
it
was
appropriate.
G
Okay,
so
I
guess
this
is
for
the
applicant
I'm
befuddled,
because
I
I
had
in
my
notes-
and
you
know
prepping
and
looking
at
the
documentation
part
of
this
meeting,
I
I
basically
had
put
down
you
know:
I
didn't
nothing
bothered
me,
but
you
just
said
something
about
you're
going
to
come
back
and
look
for
a
PD
you're
asking
for
ukian
zoning
request.
Why
can't
you?
Why
aren't
you
asking
for
something
that
you
a
zoning
request
or
I'm
sorry,
a
a
land
use
request
that
you
can
actually
build
to
why?
Why?
Wouldn't
that
be
ktie?
G
R
G
B
L
L
Say
something
about
it
before
we
go
I
I'm
I
really
want
to
appreciate
you
bringing
up
the
question
of.
Why
can't
you
just
build
in
it
and
I?
Think.
That's
really.
That's
really.
The
question
here
I
know
we're
talking
about.
We
had
a
nice
discussion
today
about
future
land
use
and
the
reality
is
we
can't
they?
No
one
can
promise
what
they're
going
to
build
on
this
site.
This
just
happens
to
be
the
land
use.
This
is
going
forward
as
what
it
is
and
I
I,
I,
agree.
L
I
think
it's
too
much
I
think
think.
L
That
that
the
project
should
be
reconsidered
to
fit
within
the
neighborhood
and
the
zoning
that's
allowed
so
I
would,
if
I
would
I
think
we
just
do
an
a
denial.
Do
do
I
have
to
read
anything
specific
for
that
Miss
well
or.
A
M
L
Okay,
then
I
I
make
a
motion
to
deny
file
number
TPA
23-7
for
land
prop
for
property,
located
at
307
North
Westland
Avenue
and
2109
2111
and
2113
West
North
B
Street
from
a
residential
20
to
a
neighborhood
mixed
used
and
residential
20
R20
to
Neighborhood
mixed
used
n
n,
the
35
nm35.
G
I
I
do
I
I,
I
kind
of
want
to
double
down
on.
What
was
just
said
is
that
if
it's
just
I'm
actually
kind
of
like
Amal
to
the
density
that
You'
you
know
requested
because
it
it
is
it's
sort
of
transitional
and
steep
down
from
our
transportation
corridors,
and
you
know
mixed
used
area,
but
the
change
of
use
and
adding
that
commercial
El
into
it.
It's
it's
it's
it's
just
not
something
that
I'm
I'm
I'm
going
to
I'm
going
to
vote
to
deny
as
well
and
I
just
wanted
to
explain
that
again.
G
F
B
G
S
B
It
it
is
what
what
did
what's
happening
is
they
we
want
to
show
whoever's
speaking
at
the
podium
or
the
lean
first
and
then
so
the
audience
knows
people
at
home
and
then
they'll
pull
up
the
presentation.
S
Sir
Danny
Collins
with
your
planet
commission
staff
today
I'll
be
presenting
tcpa
2308,
it's
for
a
property
on
West,
Columbus,
Boulevard
or
West
Columbus
Drive,
just
to
the
west
of
the
intersection
of
North
Boulevard
and
West
Columbus
Drive.
Just
a
quick
background.
This
a
privately
initiated
Amendment,
it's
small
scale
and
size,
the
subject
sites
approximately
36
Acres.
The
request
is
to
change
the
future
land
use
from
the
residential
20
designation
to
the
community.
Mixed
use,
35
designation.
S
Here
is:
u
a
general
location
map
subject:
sites
within
the
central
Tampa
planning
district,
it's
within
the
Ridgewood
Park
neighborhood,
and
it's
along
West
Columbus
Drive,
which
is
a
Transit
emphasis.
S
Corridor
here
is
an
aerial
map
of
the
subject
site
and
the
surrounding
properties.
You'll
see
the
subject
site
it's
on.
It's
highlighted
in
yellow
it's
just
to
the
west
of
the
intersection
of
North
Boulevard
and
West
Columbus
Drive.
This
portion
of
West
Columbus
Drive
is
predominantly
non-residential
in
character.
There
are
some
like
commercial
uses
to
the
north
and
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site.
S
This
is
the
woven
water
Brewery
here
right
in
here
is
philps
Park,
it's
hard
to
see,
but
it's
this
tree
cover
shown
here
on
the
map.
As
we
move
South
off
the
corridor,
you'll
see
some
single
family
detached
residential
uses.
Here
is
an
image
standing
on
the
subject
site,
looking
North
from
the
sub
from
looking
North
across
the
subject
site
from
on
West
Columbus
Drive.
This
is
looking
East
at
the
subject
site.
This
is
the
intersection
of
North
Boulevard
and
Columbus
Drive.
S
This
is
another
image.
Looking
East
along
West
Columbus
Drive.
This
is
looking
West
at
the
subject
site.
So
this
is
looking
West
Down
Columbus.
S
Drive
here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
The
subject
site
is
currently
recognized
under
the
residential
20
future
land
use
designation.
That
designation
allows
residential
development
up
to
20
dwelling
un
per
acre
allows
consideration
of
single
family,
detached
single
family
attached
and
multi
family
uses
directly
to
the
north
and
east
of
the
subject.
S
Site
is
land
recognized
under
the
Community
mixed
juuse,
35,
designation
and
then
to
the
south
and
west
of
the
subject
site
shown
in
this
tan
color
is
land
recognized
under
the
residential
10
future
land
use
designation
again
this
is
Philips
Park
shown
in
this
green
color
here
and
then
this
Green
Line
represents
the
KSA
aard
area.
This
subject
site
is
just
outside
the
kard
area.
The
Tampa
Heights
Urban
Village
is
directly
to
the
east
of
North
Boulevard.
S
So
this
is
just
outside
the
Urban
Village
boundary
here
is
the
proposed
future
land
use
map
showing
the
subject
site
under
the
Community
mixed
use.
35
designation,
this
subject
site
was
actually
changed,
I
believe
in
2021
from
the
residential
residential
10
designation
to
the
residential
20
future
Lanes
designation,
also
directly
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site.
S
These
Parcels
here
were
recently
changed
to
community
mix,
use
35
and
then
residential
35
here,
just
at
the
intersection
of
Amilia
Avenue
in
North
Boulevard,
currently
under
the
residential
20
designation,
the
subject
site
can
be
considered
for
seven
dwelling
units
or
just
over
7,800
ft
of
non-residential
uses
that
non-residential
uses
currently
are
subject
to
commercial
locational
criteria,
as
proposed
under
the
CMU
35
designation
subject.
Site
could
be
considered
for
up
to
12
dwelling
units
or
just
over
31,363
ft
of
residential
or
non-residential
development.
S
This
request
would
also
introduce
the
consideration
of
commercial
General
Uses
and
could
result
in
a
higher
residential
density
and
greater
commercial
intensity.
On
the
subject
site,
the
Planning
Commission
reviewed
this
request
and
it
found
it
consistent
with
several
policies
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
They
found
it
consistent
with
the
plan's
housing
policy,
specifically
promoting
infill
development
on
vacant
and
underutilized
land.
They
also
found
it
consistent
with
the
mixed
use,
Corridor
policies
and
promoting
density
along
our
density
in
areas
that
support
Transit.
S
Again
Columbus
is
a
Transit
empasis
Corridor.
The
plan
speaks
about
how
Transit
development
on
those
corridors
are
suitable
for
intensification
and
Redevelopment.
And
finally,
the
request
was
consistent
with
the
city's
compact
City
Forum
strategy.
Based
on
those
considerations,
the
Planning
Commission
recommends
that
the
proposed
map
amend
be
found
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
That
concludes
my
presentation
available
for
any
questions.
K
Good
evening,
Isabelle
Albert
with
half
representing
the
applicant
again
quickly,
this
is
the
location
of
the
site.
This
location
may
look
familiar
to
you
because
you
recently
looked
at
this
corner
down
here.
We're
doing
this
mix
use
development
with
the
retail
and
apartments
on
top.
K
The
has
since
then
purchased
the
corner
and
the
subject
site
and
it
wants
to
develop
as
a
unified
development
and,
as
you
can
see,
currently
the
site
is
bordered
by
CMU
over
here
to
the
north
and
this
residential,
and
the
goal
is
just
to
do
this
as
a
cm35
to
to
to
be
combined
with
this
development
in
order
to
develop
the
as
a
phase
two
again
Planning
Commission
didn't
have
any
objections.
They
found
numerous
policies
to
support
this
and
as
well
as
the
Planning
Commission
commission,.
F
E
B
N
F
T
May,
if
I
may,
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading
consideration
ordinance
amending
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan,
future
land
use
element,
future
land
use
map
for
the
property
located
at
150,
located
I'm.
Sorry,
approximately
150
ft
west
of
intersection
of
West
Columbus
Drive
in
North
Boulevard,
folio
number
18,
3355
d,
00005
from
residential
20
R20
to
community
mixed
use,
35
CMU,
35,
providing
for
repeal
of
all
ordinances
and
conflict
providing
for
separability
providing
an
effective
data.
D
C
B
S
Danny
Collins
again
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff.
This
this
is
tcpa
2309,
it's
for
the
properties
located
at
8,300,
North,
elony,
Avenue
and
2109
West,
Juno
Street.
Just
a
quick
background.
This
is
a
privately
initiated,
Amendment,
it's
small
scale
and
size,
the
subject
size
approximately
66
acres
and
the
request
is
change.
The
future
land
use
from
the
residential
10
designation
to
the
community
commercial
35,
designation,
the
here's,
a
general
location
map,
subject,
sites
shown
here
on
the
map.
S
It's
within
the
university
planning
district,
it's
and
more
specifically
it's
in
the
Armory
Gardens
neighborhood
here
is
an
area
of
the
subject
site
and
surrounding
properties.
You'll
see
the
subject
site
is
shown
in
yellow
it's
at
the
northwest
corner
of
West
Juno
Street
in
North,
Albany
Avenue,
it's
just
south
of
Waters
Avenue,
there's
predominantly
commercial
uses,
a
mix,
mixture
of
commercial
intensive
and
commercial
General
Uses
along
Waters
Avenue
directly
to
the
east
of
the
subject.
S
Site
are
single
family
detached
homes,
as
well
as
to
the
west
of
the
site
and
then
to
the
south
of
the
site
is
a
Tio
substation.
This
is
an
image
looking
at
the
subject
site
here
are
some
of
the
single
family
detached
homes
that
interface
the
subject
site
along
North,
Albany
Avenue.
So
these
homes
are
to
the
east
of
the
subject.
S
Site
here
is
an
image
of
the
too
substation
interfacing
along
West
interfacing,
the
subject
site
along
West
Juno
Street.
This
is
to
the
South
here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
The
subject
site
is
currently
recognized
under
the
residential
10
designation
to
the
north
of
the
subject
site
we
have
Community
commercial
35,
and
then
we
just
east
of
North,
Albany
Avenue
along
Waters,
is
land
recognized
under
the
cm35
designation
to
the
south
of
the
to
the
South
east
and
west
of
the
subject.
S
Site
is
land
recognized
under
the
residential
10
future
land
use
designation
here
is
the
proposed
future
land
use
map
showing
the
subject
site
under
the
Community
commercial
35
designation.
So
this
would
bring
the
community
commercial
35
down
south
to
Juno
Street,
currently
under
the
residential
10
designation,
the
subject
site
can
be
considered
for
six
dwelling
units
or
just
over
10,000
square
feet
of
non-residential
uses
subject
to
commercial
locational
criteria,
as
proposed
under
the
Community
commercial
35.
Future
land
use
designation.
S
The
subject
site
can
be
considered
for
23
dwelling
units
or
57,4
198,
Square,
ft
of
residential
or
non-residential
uses.
This
request
would
also
introduced
the
consideration
of
commercial
General
and
Commercial
intensive
uses
and
would
result
in
a
higher
residential
density
and
greater
commercial
intensity.
On
the
subject
site,
the
Planning
Commission
staff
found
this
request.
Inconsistent.
However,
at
the
Planning
Commission
hearing,
the
Planning
Commission
found
the
request
consistent
with
several
policies
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
S
The
Planning
Commission
found
the
request
consistent
with
land
use
policy
1.2.3
that
seeks
to
relate
develop
El
to
the
context
of
the
neighborhood
They
al.
The
Planning
Commission
also
found
it
consistent
with
policies
that
support
proposals
to
convert
non-residential
properties
along
mixed
use,
corridors
to
residential
or
mixed
use,
and
then
finally,
the
Planning
Commission
found
the
request
would
encourage
the
development
of
commercial
uses
to
that
are
in
scale
with
the
surrounding
area.
Again,
the
Planning
Commission
staff
found
this
request
inconsistent.
S
However,
the
planning
commission
recommended
that
the
proposed
map
Amendment
be
found
consistent
with
the
goals,
injectives
and
policies
of
the
Tampa
comprensive
plan.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
Avable
for
any
question.
S
G
So
the
Planning
Commission
is,
is
their
word.
Processing
keyboard
broken
that
they're
not
able
to
type
I
in
in
front
because
it
seems
like
consistently
coming
with
consistent
regardless,
so
it
just
I,
don't
know
just
cracks
me
up.
That's
that's!
That's
just
an
observation:
they
don't
they
don't
seem
to
be
able
to
type
in
consistent,
so
I
mean
I.
G
Look
at
I
look
at
this
map
and
the
existing
land
use
seems
to
be
so
consistent
with
with
urban
planning
and
it
befuddles
me
because
it's
it's
it's
like
perfect,
tiered
away
from
the
corridors
steep
down
into
residential,
and
you
know
a
mixed
use,
and
by
doing
this
we're
creating
by
if
we
were
to
Grant
this
we'd
create
an
inconsist
consistency.
We
have
this
anomaly
of
this
land.
Now
that
is
encroaching
on
the
residential
area,
that
is,
with
commercial
intensive.
That's
not
consistent
with
the
development
patterns
of
that
neighborhood,
so
it
it
just
it
completely.
G
B
E
There
we
are
so
this
is
tcpa
23-9,
Mr
Collins
presented
this
to
you
quite
well.
It
is
in
the
Armenia
Gardens
area.
The
issue
is
a
comp
plan,
Amendment
res
10,
to
commercial
community,
commercial
35
for
66,
acre
area
City
of
Tampa
planning
staff
has
no
objections.
They
were
fine
with
it
and
U
communicate
their
no
objection
to
this
application
and,
as
you
heard
from
Mr
Collins,
the
Planning
Commission
voted
substantially
in
support
7
to
one
in
support
of
this
request.
E
Up
till
tonight
we
have
not
heard
from
a
single
AB
budding
or
closely
located
neighbor,
which
I
think
is
a
very
important
distinction.
Looking
through
the
Departments
and
reviews,
no
comments,
no
objections
from
the
main
departments
that
review
the
request.
E
Now,
as
you
look
at
the
mapping,
I
can
see
Mr
clinten
and
brought
up
a
couple
points,
but
there
was
one
critical,
critical
point
that
I,
don't
think
was
presented
in
a
perspective
that
U
reflects
what
the
request
is
about,
and
that
is
this
is
a
site
that
is
sandwiched
between
a
cc35
and
a
tremendously
intensive
aesthetic
element
of
a
too
substation
and,
as
you
can
see,
on
the
existing
future
land
use
map,
it
designates
Public
Communication
Utilities
in
a
very
large
area
immediately
to
the
South,
and
this
is
the
te
substation.
E
So
when
we
looked
at
the
site
reviewed
the
site,
we
took
into
account
what
the
land
use
category
is
to
the
South
and
to
the
north,
which
is
again.
This
little
parcel
is
sandwich
between
those
two.
This
is
an
aerial
view.
You
can
see
the
drop
pin
to
the
north.
You
can
see
the
vast
wide
area
of
the
too
substation.
E
So
again,
our
opinion
and
the
opinion
indirectly,
not
speaking
for
your
staff
and
for
the
seven
out
of
one
planning
Commissioners
who
approved,
is
that
we
did
not
feel
it
was
conducive
or
appropriate
for
residential
I.
Personally
would
not
want
to
have
my
home
there.
It
certainly
is
not
an
aesthetic
element
of
any
kind
and
then
based
again
upon
the
point
between
noticing
and
public
hearings,
that
again
till
tonight,
we've
not
heard
from
a
single
budding
or
nearby
resident.
E
There
was
a
consistent
consistency
element
that
we
felt
was
very
strong,
so
your
staff,
ref
or
ref
reviews
a
number
of
intensive
uses
which
primarily
most
are
too
small
in
terms
of
being
intensive
uses
and
the
staff
notes
in
the
report.
The
further
expansion
south
of
westw
corridor
is
an
intrusion,
but
we
found
that
absolutely
to
be
not
the
case
in
our
opinion,
because,
as
I've
shown,
you
there's
a
vast
area
continued
to
the
South
that
is
shown
as
public
under
a
futural
anage
category,
public
utility
and
Communications
and
the
use
of
the
Tio
substation.
E
So
in
terms
of
that
intrusion
into
the
area,
it's
already
gone
way
past
and
surpass
our
site.
That's
before
you
tonight,
and
under
R
10
as
neighborhood
uses,
which
are
permissible,
there
would
be
intensive
or
other
types
of
commercial
uses
that
would
be
permitted.
Mr
Collins
referred
to
it,
but
specifically
neighborhood
serving
uses
would
be
permissible.
So
with
that
we
felt
that
was
that
the
end,
oh,
that
that's
the
end
of
the
PowerPoint.
Yes,
so
with
that,
we
appreciate
your
consideration
and
we
appreciate
any
questions
that
we
might
be
able
answer.
B
U
Name:
hi
Linda
Quinn,
president
of
media
Gardens,
Estates,
neighborhood
association.
It's
a
newly
formed
Association
I'd
like
to
speak
to
a
couple
of
inaccuracies
in
Mr
pressman's
presentation.
He
said
that
no
neighbors
objected
to
this.
No
neighbor
No,
Good
Neighbor
notice
was
sent
because
the
address
on
file
with
the
city
of
Tampa
was
in
complete,
so
there
was
not
an
opportunity
for
any
neighbor
to
have
a
descending
opinion
on
this.
This
lot
is
relatively
small.
The
streets
in
our
neighborhood
are
only
15
fet
wide.
U
We
already
have
problems
with
people
going
down
the
streets
too
quickly
and
congestion,
if
he's
getting.
If
they
get
approval
for
the
future
land
use
that
they
desire.
It
goes
from
six
dwelling
units
to
57
dwelling
units.
Where
are
these
people
going
to
park?
As
you
probably
know,
in
seol
Heights,
there
is
a
huge
catastrophe
with
parking
and
commercial
buildings.
I.
Don't
think
that
this
would
be
good
for
the
neighborhood
and
I
perhaps
misunderstood
what
he
was
saying,
but
he
it's
I
inferred
that
he
was
saying
there
is
stuff
already
here
in
the
neighborhood.
U
So
what's
another
thing,
but
that
would
only
make
our
neighborhood
worse.
We
already
have
a
big
problem
with
people
in
this
neighborhood.
That's
mostly
rs50
single
family,
r10
and
they're
running
basically,
industrial
work
out
of
their
homes
and
there's
a
lot
of
litter,
there's
quite
frankly
things
that
the
EPC
need
to
be
called
about
and
I,
don't
think
it
would
be
good
for
the
community,
because
if
they
don't
have
to
submit
a
plan
of
what
they're
going
to
do,
it
will
set
a
bad
precedent
and
we
don't
like
the
women
said
previously.
U
B
E
I
would
from
the
very
nice
lady,
this
is
a
very
important
distinction.
We
still
have
never
have
not
received
a
single
call
or
email
from
an
abing
or
any
nearby
neighbor.
The
young
lady
gave
me
a
call.
She
heads
up
the
HOA
in
the
very
large
area,
so
we
do
stand
here
today
with
a
public
notice
that
went
out
to
every
neighbor
and
notice
signs
right
on
the
corner.
We
have
not
heard
from
any
impacted
or
potentially
impacted
neighbor.
That's
a
critical
distinction.
E
The
young
lady
spoke
about
increasing
more
traffic
down
the
street.
Well,
the
fact
is,
it's
already
our
10
we're
seeking
commercial
use,
because
the
owner,
the
owner
of
this
property,
owns
everything
to
the
north.
It
will
be
a
part
of
his
current
commercial
activity,
so
there
will
be
no
generated
traffic
because
it
will
be
all
contained
within
the
property
he
already
owns.
So
that
is
an
advantage
to
what
her
concern
was
in
terms
of
Greater
traffic
into
the
area.
E
So
with
that
again,
you
have
your
own
City
staff,
the
Planning
Commission
members,
some
who
you
appointed
in
support
and
absolutely
zero
concerns
from
anyone
who
would
be
impacted
by
this
directly.
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
thank.
M
A
an
amendment
to
the
comprehensive
plan
attachment
F
of
every
staff
report
that
you
received
speaks
to
what
what
it
means
when
you
amend
the
comprehensive
plan
that
it's
a
a
major
policy
decision
and
your
determination
that
either
a
change
of
circumstances
justifies
it
or
that
the
existing
land
use
category
is
no
longer
appropriate
and
so
again
what
you're
saying
if
you
approve
this,
is
that
this
particular
land
use
is
appropriate
at
this
Lev
location.
And,
if
you
don't
believe,
that's
the
case,
then
it
would
be
appropriate
to
take
appropriate
action.
M
L
L
L
On
whether
something
is
consistent
or
appropriate
or
I
just
didn't
realize
we
had
that
I
would
love
to
know
more
about
the
seats
that
we
get
to
a
point
Thank.
You.
W
T
G
Yeah
I
mean
again
I,
just
re
double
down
on
what
I
previously
stated
and
and
the
point
about
the
too
substation
is
well
taken.
However,
to
the
right
of
this
property
to
the
east
of
the
property
to
the
west
of
the
property
is,
is
consistent
with
the
current
land
use
of
these
parcels,
and
you
look
around
this
map
and
it's
again
you
in
the
original
in
the
state
that
it's
currently
in.
G
If
we
were
crafting
land
use,
we
would
not
have
crafted
a
better
map
as
far
as
consistency
and
step
down
from
the
the
more
densely
areas
of
Water
Street
in
Armenia,
we've
got
step
down,
land
use
already
there.
This
is
very
consistent
residential
land
use
throughout
this
area
and
again,
you
know
nobody
loves
a
totico
station
in
their
backyard,
but
you
know
it
is
what
it
is
existing
condition.
It's
a
shame
that
too
doesn't
doesn't
Shield
this
better
from
the
neighborhood,
but
I
just
I.
L
L
I
I
agree
and
I
mean
right
now.
This
is
a
residential
area.
L
L
It's
just
disappointing
because,
because
I,
this
is
not
the
first,
the
second,
the
third
time
I've
heard
heard
folks
speaking
for
the
applicant
that
talk
about
not
wanting
to
live
in
an
area
and
and
or
I,
wouldn't
live
there
and
I.
Just
don't
think
that's
appropriate
for
talking
about
a
land
use
change
to
kind
of
make.
It
seem
like.
Oh
these
residents
don't
deserve
to
have
their
neighborhood
saved
or
preserved,
and
it's
just
something
I've
noticed
lately
and
and
I
really
hope
it
stops,
because
it's
offensive.
M
X
Yes,
I
move
file,
number
TPA
23-9
an
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
ordinance
amending
the
Tampa,
comprehensive
plan;
future
land
use
element,
future
land
use
map
for
the
property.
Oh
no
I'm,
sorry
I'm
on
number,
two
right:
three:
okay:
okay!
Well,
we
we!
We
did
eight
first
and
it's
kind
of
throwing
me
off
land
use
for
the
property
located
at
8,300,
North,
ALB
Avenue
and
2109
West
Juno
Street
from
residential
10
r10
to
community
commercial
35
cc35,
providing
for
repeal
of
all
ordinances
in
Conflict,
providing
for
severability,
providing
an
effective
date.
B
B
S
Report
Danny
Collins
again
with
your
Planning
Commission
staff
today
I'll
be
presenting
TPA
2312.
It's
a
map
Amendment
generally
located
at
the
southeast
corner
of
North
Albany
Avenue
and
West
Kirby
Street.
Just
a
quick
background.
This
a
privately
initiated
Amendment,
it's
small
scale
and
size,
the
subject
sites
approximately
05
acres
and
the
request
is
to
change
the
future
land
use
from
the
residential
10
designation
to
the
residential
20
designation.
S
Here
is
a
general
locator
map.
The
subject
site
is
here:
it
is
within
the
university
planning
district
and
it's
within
the
Armory
Gardens
EST
States
neighborhood
here
is
an
area
of
subject
site
in
the
surrounding
properties.
The
subject
site
is
at
the
southeast
corner
of
West
Kirby
Street
in
North,
Albany
Avenue.
The
surrounding
area
is
predominantly
single
family
detached.
S
S
T
S
Here
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map,
as
you
can
see,
the
subject
site
and
the
surrounding
properties
are
recognized
under
the
residential
10
future
land
use.
S
Designation,
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
change
the
subject
site
to
the
residential
20
designation,
and
that
is
shown
here
on
our
proposed
future
land
use
map.
S
Currently,
the
subject
site
does
not
meet
the
minimum
acreage
requirement
to
build
a
a
single
family
or
a
a
dwelling
unit
on
the
subject
sit
the
subject
site
could
be
considered
for
762
ft
of
non-residential
uses,
and
that
would
be
subject
to
locational
criteria,
as
proposed
the
subject
site
could
be,
would
could
be
considered
for
one
dwelling
unit
or
1,89
ft
of
non-residential
uses
again.
That
would
be
subject
to
locational
criteria,
so
this
subject
site
would
would
introduce
a
higher
density
on
the
subject
site.
S
We
sent
this
off
to
our
partner,
reviewing
agencies,
a
city
of
Tampa
provided
comments.
Those
comments
are
in
your
report.
There
were
no
comments
received
from
the
other
reviewing
agencies,
the
Planning
Commission
staff
found
this
request,
inconsistent
and
that's
shown
in
your
packet.
This
went
to
the
Planning
Commission
in
septe
second
week
of
September
and
the
Planning
Commission
found
it
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
S
They
found
it
consistent
with
policies
that
continue
to
protect
and
enhance
single
family
neighborhoods,
and
finally,
they
found
it
consistent
with
policies
that
encourage
new
housing
on
vacant,
infill
or
underutilized
land.
Based
on
those
considerations,
the
planet
commission
recommends
that
tcpa
2312
be
found
consistent
with
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
Any
questions.
Y
Applicant
okay,
good
evening,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
my
name
is
Leo
Martinez
and
I.
Am
the
current
owner
of
the
of
this
bacon
laot
located
at
1916
West
Kirby
Street
under
folio
number
10926.
Y
First
of
all,
I
would
like
to
thank
you
all
for
being
here
today
and
give
me
the
opportunity
to
express
myself
I,
never
done
this
before
so
I'm,
just
getting
familiar
with
the
whole
process.
So
forgive
me
if
I
do
something
that
I
don't
have
to
I'll,
be
here
talking
about
the
Thea
before
me.
He
did
a
great
job
explaining
what
is
it
the
that
that
we're
trying
to
do
but
I
will
try
to
explain
myself
a
little
bit
better
as
it
stands
right
now.
This
property
is
through.
Y
It
is
located
within
a
residential
T
area
which
stand
for
low
density
for
single
family
detached
homes,
but
there
is
some
other
residential
20s
and
some
other
users
that
are
close
to
this
prop
property.
Y
Here
is
an
an
aial
view,
view
of
the
lab,
which
shows
that
it
is
not
in
very
close,
close
proximity
to
any
other
residence
that
would
make
it
a
problem
and
before
I
continue
more
into
like
the
details.
I
would
like
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
myself
and
and
how
I
got
into
this
situation.
So
you
can
really
understand
why
I'm
doing
this,
as
you
all
probably
can
tell
you,
know,
I'm
an
immigrant
came
to
this
country
about
8
years
ago.
Y
So
not
that
long
ago,
initially
I
mean
was
I.
I
can
hear
by
myself
also
initially
it
was
tough
time
so,
but
over
time,
I
start
doing
better
and
a
few
years
ago
I
was
able
to
buy
my
first
property
my
home.
Since
the
budget
wasn't
too
much.
I
only
could
afford
in
a
small
house
three
bedroom,
one
bathroom
under
th000
square
footage
initially
for
me
and
my
wife
was
perfect
place.
Y
We
were
doing
okay,
but
as
time
time
pass,
I
got
blessed
with
the
beautiful
daughter
and
after
that
my
parents
decide
to
also
emigrate
here
and
come
to
live
with
us
now.
I
got
bigger,
family
house
got
smaller,
so
I
start
looking
around
for
for
some
other
opportunities
and,
as
you
all
probably
know,
well
and
got
you
know,
everybody
tell
you
here
every
day
it
is
almost
impossible
to
afford
a
house
right
now.
The
house,
the
housing
market
is
almost
through
the
roof.
Y
Rental
market
is
also
impossible
to
get
in
right
now,
so
I
came
across
this
property
when
I,
when
I
got
my
when
when
I
got
the
property,
I
didn't
know
any
of
these
things
that
that
I
wasn't
able
to
do
with
it.
So
I
tried
to
work
with
the
city
and
start.
You
know
the
process
to
develop
the
the
property,
but
then
I
came.
You
know
in
front
of
many
walls
and
that's
how
I
got
through
this
process
I.
What?
Y
Basically,
what
I'm
proposing
is
to
change
the
L
use
of
this
property
from
a
residential
10
to
a
residential
20
which
still
is
is,
is
CL,
classify
under
low
to
medium
density,
so
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
asking
for
town
house
I'm,
not
asking
for
apartment
Apartments
I'm,
just
asking
for
a
small
dwelling
unit
why
this
should
even
be
considered
I'm,
going
to
show
a
few
things
that
that
I,
that
I
put
together
before
I
bought
the
property.
Y
This
is
what
the
property
look
like,
so
it
was
basically
dump
Full,
Of,
Weeds
and-
and
there
was
a
lot
of
trash
in
the
place
when
I
bought
it
I
clean
out
the
whole
place.
I
I
took
a
lot
of
trash
out
of
the
place.
I
put
a
fence
and
I
have
been
keeping
it
for
the
past
few
years.
Basically,
this
is
what
I'm
planning
to
do
again.
Nothing
too
crazy.
Y
Just
in
a
small
house
that
blends
perfectly
with
the
community,
it
will
enhance
that
corner,
definitely
better
than
what
that
one,
that
what
it
is
there
right
now.
Another
statement
is
that
other
people
could
also
benefit
from
this.
Y
I
mean
this
is
the
city
of
t
and
it's
surprisingly,
there
is
still
a
lot
of
small
piece
of
land
like
those
out
there
and
we
got
a
crisis
on
the
on
the
housing
market,
so
other
people
could
definitely
def
benefit
from
from
what
I'm
doing
another
thing
important
thing
that
I
would
like
to
mention
the
picture
on
the
on
the
right
side.
My
right
side
is
that
this
area,
where
my
my
property
is
located,
is
one
of
the
few
areas
in
the
whole
Tampa
area
that
allows
for
accessory
dwelling
units.
Y
So
what
does
this
mean?
This
mean
that
in
this
area,
other
people
is
allowed
to
do
an
accessory
dwelling
unit,
increaseed
density
in
their
house,
but
I
got
a
wide,
open
land
and
I'm
not
allowed
to
even
do
anything
with
it.
Another
point
that
I
wanted
to
mention
is
that
when
I
began
this
whole
process,
I
was
told
that,
because
it
would
have
been
just
basically
an
island
in
the
middle
of
whole,
residential
T
area
wouldn't
be
doable,
but
I
did
research
and
I
found
out
that
I,
not
the
only
case.
Y
That
is
other
cases
that
have
been
approved
that
also
I
guess
that
they
got
their
particularities,
but
they
have
been
also
approved
and,
as
a
conclusion,
I
got
letter
from
the
from
some
neighbors
that
they
approved
I
got
letter
from
z,
business
contractors,
Engineers
that
have
explained
to
them.
What
I'm
trying
to
do.
They
basically
have
G.
Given
me
the
their
blessing
and
that's
it.
B
D
S
R20,
so,
under
the
current
adopted
future
land
use
of
residential
10,
it
allows
development
up
to
10
dwelling
units
per
acre.
It
allows
consideration
of
single
family
detached
uses.
Currently,
the
subject
site
does
not
meet
the
minimum
acreage
requirement
under
the
r10.
That's
why
you
cannot
build
a
home
on
it
under
the
R1
20.
It
would
allow
twice
the
density.
S
So
it
would
allow
consideration
of
multif
family
uses,
though,
under
this
acreage,
it
would
only
account
to
one
unit.
D
F
F
L
Thank
you,
I
have
a
question
for
Planning
Commission
staff,
or
maybe
our
staff.
What
is.
L
Z
I
do
not
know
the
zoning
I
could
have
to
look
it
up,
but
it
is
a
25
foot
lot
which
at
that
point
at
a
corner,
I
mean
it's
essentially
they'll
have
to
P.
In
order
to
build
the
house,
they'll
have
to
come
in
and
PD
the
the
property,
so
there
would
be
a
rezoning
for
it.
L
How
did
this
lot
happen?
Was
this
a
legal
lot
split.
M
Susan
Johnson
valz
legal
department-
it's
my
understanding
from
this
from
the
staff
report
that
this
was
an
illegally
split
lot
and
that
is
an
illegally
non-conforming
lot
and
maybe
Mr
Collins
can
speak
to
the
fact
that
there
there
is
a
provision
in
the
comp
plan
for
a
legally
non-conforming
lot
to
provide
an
opportunity
for
it
to
be
developed.
I
Danny.
If
you
want
to.
S
Yes,
there
is
a
provision
in
the
plan
for
plotted
lots
that
don't
meet
the
minimum
acreage
requirement.
If
you,
for
example,
if
you
have
like
a
089
you
could,
you
could,
could
not8
08
acre
lot
and
it's
a
lot
of
record.
It
doesn't
meet
the
density
requirements.
We
would
allow
them
to
build
a
unit
on
there,
but
because
this
is
an
an
illegal
non-conforming
lot
it
would
we
would
it's
not
available
to
utilize.
L
Z
Yes,
Evan
Johnson,
City
Planning,
just
to
add
a
little
context.
There
was
a
lot
of
Correspondence
between
the
applicant
and
our
zoning
and
growth
management
department
and
basically,
what
happened
is
the
only
evidence
through
the
title
process
was
that
they
could
find
was
this
slot
was
probably
split
somewhere
around
1982,
and
so
in
order
to
be
a
legally
non-conforming,
it
would
have
to
have
happened
prior
to
zoning,
which
would
be
I,
believe
1956,
five
or
six.
L
Y
Yeah,
so
I
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
it
was
find
out.
So
the
last
record
is
that
it
was
it
was
from
1982,
but
it
doesn't
state
that
it
was
split
that
time
and
also
to
answer
your
your
question.
I
will
be
able
to
build
a
house
of
12
foot
by
60
foot
long
on
that
space.
B
U
Linda
Quinn
president
agna
I've
been
to
this
lot.
It's
I,
don't
know
how
a
a
house
60
feet
long
can
fit
there.
It's
about
20t
by
40t,
I
count
it
it's
incredibly
narrow
and
my
bigger
concern,
while
I
feel
for
the
applicant,
because
I
know
it's
very
tough
and
things
everything
he
cited
or
said
is
very
true
because
it's
very
difficult.
My
big
concern
is
it's
setting
a
precedent
to
increase
the
density
of
our
neighborhood.
He
said
he
mentioned
that
there
are
other
R20
lot
designations.
However,
there
are
not.
U
If
you
look
at
the
city
planning
report,
it
says
there
there
are
no
R20
Parcels
anywhere
near
there.
In
fact,
it
says
that
they
object
to
the
amendment.
There
are
no
Parcels
currently
designated
R20
within
the
vicinity
of
this
parcel.
It
is
surrounded
by
Parcels
designated
r10.
The
nearest
R20
Parcels
are
are
over
a
half
a
mile
to
the
southeast,
while
the
small
size
of
the
parcel
would
only
allow
for
one
dwelling
unit.
U
If
the
amendment
is
approved,
it
would
create
an
enclave
for
R20
and
establish
a
precedent
for
additional
plan
amendments
in
the
era.
That's
my
big
concern.
I!
Don't
know
about
planning
I'm
wondering
if
maybe
a
design
exception
or
something
that
can
move
around,
changing
it
to
changing
the
future
planning
and
still
allowing
the
applicant
to
get
his
home
built
and
that's
all
I
have
to
say.
AA
Sir,
hey
good
evening,
everyone,
my
name,
is
Kenny
and
a
I
live
in
a
lot
immediately
next
door
to
1916.
He
mentioned
a
few
things
that
I
just
wanted
to
clarify,
clarify
and
he
had
a
picture
up
of
cars
and
things
parked
in
that
area.
AA
I've
been
in
the
house
since,
before
he
purchased
the
lot,
and
some
so
just
some
background
and
some
history
on
from
what
neighbors
around
me
have
explained
to
me,
how
that
lot
was
split
at
some
point
in
the
80s,
like
you
guys
have
mentioned
the
mother
who
owned
the
lot.
The
house
that
I
am
in
her
son
did
something
illegal
and
essentially
had
her
sign
paperwork
over
to
get
the
lot
split
in
that
fashion.
AA
AA
The
lot
is
extremely
narrow,
I
think
you
know.
If
there
is
a
house,
that's
allowed
to
be
built
there,
I
I
would
have
absolutely
no
privacy,
I.
Think
there's
you
know.
The
lot
is
2500
sare
ft.
You
know
prior
to
that
lot
being
purchased.
It
already
wasn't
being
kept
up
well
from
the
previous
owner.
The
grass
hadn't
been
cut
in
months.
I
would
end
up
just
cutting
the
grass,
and
even
today
he
mentioned
that
it's
it's
a
dump
or
it
was
a
dump
before
he
purchased
it.
But
that's
simply
not
true.
AA
AA
Small
of
a
lot
is
not
something
that
we
shouldn't
should
move
forward
with
and
again
just
he
mentioned
that
he
has
letters
from
some
neighbors
who
are
in
the
area,
I'm,
not
sure
what
neighbors
he
spoke
to,
because
everyone
who
was
adjacent
to
the
property,
so
the
property
behind
him
and
then
the
property
immediate
to
the
left
of
me.
They
also
are
not
in
approval
of
moving
forward
with
this
plan.
You
know
initially,
I
I
didn't
get
a
chance
to
go
to
the
last
hearing.
AA
Unfortunately,
I
have
a
2-year-old
son
so
and
he
was
sick.
He
had
an
ear
infection
at
time,
so
unfortunately,
I
wasn't
able
to
go
to
speak
up
at
that
point,
but
I'm
glad
just
I
was
able
to
be
here
today.
Just
kind
of
put
my
thoughts
out
there
I
think
again.
The
lot
is
extremely
narrow.
I
think
the
pictures
that
that
were
shown
really
make
it
look
a
lot
bigger
than
it
really
is
and
again
for.
For
those
reasons,
I
hope
that
you
guys
do
not
move
forward
with.
I
AA
Down
so
there's
also
a
fence
that
was
put
in
and
I,
don't
believe
it
was
put
in
it
was
put
in
prior
to
him
purchasing
the
lot
so
I
don't
want
to
put
that
on
him,
but
since
he's
bought
the
lot,
these
are
pictures
of
the
I.
Don't
know
if
you
guys
can
see
that
well,.
AA
But
you
can
see,
the
fence
is
just
it's
falling
apart
and
with
the
hurricanes,
and
you
know
the
weather:
we've
had
it's
just
laying
flat
I've
come
home
and
it's
been
laid
on
my
side
of
the
property
line,
and
you
know
this.
This
fence
is
is
falling
apart.
So
I
think
for
you
to
say
that
it
was
a
dump
before
I
mean
I.
Think
do
you.
AA
F
AA
Yes,
so
you
can
see
how
high
the
grass,
the
grass
has
grown
through
the
fence
at
this
point-
and
you
can
see
here
in
the
corner
where
you
know
the
the
grass
is
probably
6
seven
in
high.
It
hasn't
been
cut
in
probably
to
three.
B
Y
I
just
want
to
respond
to
to
what
the
gentleman
here
is
saying.
I
would
first
would
like
to
say
that
he
U
the
gentleman
he
have
been
trying
to
buy
the
lot
from
me
since
day.
One
I
got
proof
that
he
have
been
offering
me
money
for
the
lot
and
since
you
I'm
trying
to
do
something
for
for
real
that
I
need
to
put
my
parents
somewhere,
I
I
have
say
no
that's
one
reason.
The
other
thing
is
like
I.
I
have
had
a
broken
R
for
a
couple
weeks.
Y
Now
the
the
place
hasn't
been
like
that,
for
for
for
three
months
like
he
say,
I
actually
pay
somebody
to
take
care
of
the
lot,
but
this
guy
this
last
month
he
have
been
traveling,
so
he
hasn't
been
around.
So
basically,
neither
him
or
I
have
been
able
to
take
care
of
that
lot.
I
got
videos
on
my
phone.
Y
I
got
photos
on
my
phone
that
unfortunately,
I
didn't
know
that
he
was
going
to
be
here
because
he
didn't
show
up
to
the
planning
commission
or
to
the
planning
hearing,
but
I
did
remove
out
of
that
place.
Almost
two
truck
of
like
TR,
like
like
piles
of
of
trash
pile
up
against
a
big
O3
that
is
on
the
on
the
property
behind
or
close
to
the
property
behind,
and
also
one
more
thing.
Sorry,
everybody
keeps
saying
that
the
lot
is
really
small.
The
lot
is
25
by
100.
Y
The
set
backs
in
this
area
are
77
2020,
so
I'm
still
able
to
build
sorry,
an
11
by
60
full
long
property,
which
it
will
be
enough
for
a
one
bedroom.
One
bathroom
living
room
space
enough
for
for
an
old
couple
to
live
in
there.
B
B
G
I'm
I'm,
sorry,
the
motion
is
going
to
be
deny
and
I
I
apologize.
It's
like
you
know.
It's
the
buyer.
Beware
scenario
on
this.
You
know
it's
unfortunate,
but
you
and
I
know
you're
going
to
end
up
the
short
of
the
stick.
But
if,
if
we
voted
in
favor
of
this,
the
entire
neighborhood
be
I'm
short
of
the
state.
G
D
Yes,
sir
C
I'm,
I'm,
sorry
also
I
feel
that
you
work
very
hard
to
get
where
you're
at
and
your
parents
very
close
to
you
you're
very
close
to
them.
But
the
fact
is
that
if
this
lot
was
contiguous
with
yours,
you'd
have
one
big
lot
and
you
might
be
able
to
put
an
800
foot
behind
your
house
for
your
parents.
B
Thank
you
very
much.
Roll
call
vote
Clint.
C
F
AB
Good
evening
Council
Unica
Mills
Planning
Commission
staff
I'm
here
to
present
TPA
2313
located
at
5025
East
Fowler
Avenue.
This
is
a
privately
initiated
plan,
Amendment
small
and
scale
a
little
over
2
Acres.
The
request
before
you
this
evening
is
to
change
the
future
land
use
designation
from
residential
35
in
community
mixed
juice,
35
to
entirely
Community
mixed
juice.
AB
35
the
site
is
located
within
the
university
planning
district,
as
well
as
the
Terrace
Park.
AB
Neighborhood.
Here
is
an
aerial
of
the
site,
the
site
fronts
along
f
Avenue.
Here
the
eastern
boundary
of
the
site
is
51st
Street
the
site
directly
south
of
the
site
is
an
office.
Building
west
of
the
site
is
a
church
and
Light
commercial
as
well
as
multif
family
uses.
East
of
the
site
is
additional
Light
commercial
uses,
as
well
as
some
additional
multif
family.
AB
Residential,
currently,
the
site
is
designated
as
again
Community
mix,
35
and
residential
35.
Here
are
some
photos
of
the
site.
In
its
current
condition.
This
is
looking
Eastward
towards
56th
Street,
along
fira
Avenue.
This
is
that
office.
That's
directly
south
of
the
site.
That
I
was
speaking
of.
AB
Earlier
this
is
looking
West
toward
50th
Street
along
fer.
This
is
located
looking
north
of
the
subject
site
some
commercial
along
follow
Avenue
as.
AB
Well
again,
currently
the
site
is
designated
as
community
mcus
and
residential
35,
some
other
future
land
use
designations
in
the
area,
City
of
Tampa
residential
20
to
the
South
public,
semi-public
in
the
blue
to
the
West
Recreation
open
space.
In
the
light
green
we
have
some
heavy
Industrial
in
the
dark
gray.
Further
to
the
east
is
the
jurisdiction
of
Temple
Terrace
and
some
of
the
future
Lane
use
designations
include
commercial
in
the
red.
We
have
office
institutional
in
the
dark
purple
and
residential
18
in
the
dark.
AB
Brown,
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
change
the
entire
site
to
the
Community
mixed
juuse
35
here
in
the
pink.
AB
Color,
currently,
under
the
residential
35
in
the
community,
mixed
use,
35
the
site
can
be
considered
for
70
dwelling
units
or
a
little
over
123,000
ft
of
residential
or
non-residential
uses
non-residential
uses
would
be
subject
to
locational
criteria
under
the
proposed.
The
site
could
be
considered
for
again
70
dwelling
units
or
over
175,000
ft
of
either
non-residential
or
residential
uses.
The
proposed
Community
mixed
use
35
would
introduce
commercial
General
use
uses
as
well
as
an
increase
in
intensity
for
the
portion
of
the
site
that
is
currently
designated
as
the.
AB
Res35
Planning
Commission
reviewed
the
request
and
found
that
is
consistent
with
the
following
policies:
land
use
policy,
6.1.1,
6.
1.13,
promotes
development
pattern
consistent
with
the
compact
City
form
strategy,
which
encourages
mixed
use.
Inf
field
development
within
proximity
to
Transit,
Employment,
Services,
future
land
use,
objec,
1.1.1
and
policy.
1.1.5
recognizes
the
university
area
as
a
major
research
and
employment
center
and
supports
the
development
of
industries
that
complement
and
build
upon
the
research
strengths.
It's
also
consistent
with
policies
15.2
and
15.2.2,
which
promotes
mixed
use.
Development
over
single
use,
development
and
based
on
those
considerations.
AB
AC
Yeah,
thank
you.
Mr
chair
and
Council
Jim
Porter
with
acran
401,
East
Jackson
Street
on
Tampa
here
for
the
applicant
U.
We
concur
with
the
Planning
Commission
staff
and
the
Planning
Commission
itself
with
the
recommendation
of
finding
it
consistent.
This
is
really
a
cleanup.
The
existing
uses
on
the
site
are
all
commercial
and
are
all
reflective
of
the
compain
category
as
we're
asking
for
it
appears
that
the
research
the
Planning
Commission
did
when
zoning
conformance
occurred
in
the
late
80s
and
early
90s.
Somehow
this
property
got
a
split
land
use
designation.
AC
It's
not
developed
that
way.
It's
never
been
developed
that
way,
and
this
amendment
would
would
Rectify
that
and
clarify
that
the
uses
on
the
property
are
commercial
and
consistent
with
that
category.
This
is
I
want
to
show
you
on
the
Elmo.
This
is
part
of
your
backup.
This
is
the
this
is
not
the
future
land
use.
This
is
the
existing
land
use.
This
is
how
the
properties
developed.
This
is
our
site,
and
you
can
see
that
it's
developed
consistently
with
commercial
uses
even
further
south
of
us.
AC
This
is
sort
of
what
the
future
land
use
shows.
You
can
see
that
we're
split,
so
that's
what
the
future
land
use
says.
This
is
what's
actually
out
there
and
the
recommendation
is
to
allow
the
entire
property
to
have
a
consistent,
comprehensive
plan
category
at
the
Planning
Commission.
We
didn't
have
any
opposition
we've
had
nobody
object
to
this.
We
I
think
again,
it's
a
good
use
of
the
property
and
we
respectfully
ask
for
your
approval.
L
AC
Well,
yeah
I
mean
we
we
will
I,
don't
want
to
based
on
your
earlier
comments
about
talking
about
future
development.
I
don't
want
to
mention
that,
but
I
mean
we.
If
we
U,
we
will
be
potentially
coming
back
for
you
for
a
rezoning,
that's
not
part
of
today's
hearing,
but
this
this
allows
for
the
consideration
of
commercial.
That's
there.
L
Yes,
file
number
tcpa,
2313
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
and
ordinance
amending
the
Tampa
compr
comprehensive
plan,
future
land
use
element,
future
land
use
map
for
the
property
located
at
5025,
East
Fowler
Avenue
from
residential
35
R35
and
Community
mixed
use,
35
CMU,
35
to
community
mixed
use,
35
CMU
35,
providing
for
a
repeal
of
all
ordinances
in
Conflict,
providing
for
severability
providing
an
effective
date.
G
C
AD
Emily
failen
Planning
Commission
staff.
This
is
TPA
2314
and
it
has
multiple
folios
south
of
the
intersection
of
East
Fowler
Avenue
and
North
Central
Avenue.
This
was
a
privately
initiated,
Amendment
small
scale
and
it's
approximately
4.78
acres
and
the
request
before
you
is
to
go
from
residential
10
to
community
mix,
residential
10
and
Community
mixed
juice,
35
to
community
commercial
35.
This
is
the
general
location
you
can
see.
The
site
is
here:
it's
located
within
the
university
Planet
district
and
the
East
Forest
Hills
neighborhood.
AD
Here's
an
aerial
of
the
subject
site
it's
outlined
here
in
pink
to
the
east,
is
Interstate
275
and
just
north
of
the
subject.
Site
here
is
East
Fowler
and
to
the
West
is
North
Florida
Avenue
directly
to
the
north
and
also
along
North.
Florida
Avenue
are
more
of
your
heavier
commercial
uses.
This
area,
the
grassy
area
right
here,
is
currently
an
fdot
storm.
Water
retention
Pond
and
to
the
South
is
a
a
school
into
to
the
the
Southwest
right
here
is
a
single
family,
residential
neighborhood.
AD
This
is
facing
north
on
North
Central
Avenue.
Looking
at
the
subject
site,
it
is
here.
This
is
just
a
surrounding
area
facing
west
on
North
Central
Avenue.
This
is
facing
south
on
North
Central
Avenue.
The
subject
site
is
on
the
right.
This
is
the
adopted
future
land
use
map.
The
subject
site
is
represented
by
the
pink
color
in
a
very
small
sliver
right
here.
Next
to
the
pond,
is
the
residential
tent
and
to
the
South.
This
dark
brown
color
is
residential
35
along
fer,
Avenue
and
Florida.
AD
AD
Under
the
existing
residential
10
and
CMU
35,
the
subject
site
could
currently
U
be
developed
with
158
dwelling
units
or
slightly
over
392,000
Square
ft
of
residential
or
non-residential
uses
under
the
proposed
cc35.
It
has
the
potential
of
166
dwelling
units
or
slightly
over
416,000
square
ft²
of
residential
or
non-res
itial
uses
with
the
community
commercial
35
designation.
It
does
have
the
potential
to
introduce
commercial
intensive
uses
to
the.
AD
Site
the
Planning
Commission
staff
reviewed
this
and
found
it
consistent
with
several
aspects
of
the
comprehensive
plan
with
protection
of
the
residential
areas.
It
seeks
to
protect
residential
areas
while
balancing
the
need
for
new
development
to
be
compatible
with
the
neighborhood
character
and
additionally,
from
the
compr
ored
plan,
it
promotes
a
development
pattern
consistent
with
the
compact
City
form
strategy,
which
encourages
mixed
use:
infill
development
within
proximity
to
Transit
and
employment
services.
The
request
for
increased
density
and
intensity
will
meet
this
policy
Direction,
while
balancing
the
need
U,
balancing
the
neighborhood.
AD
The
comprehensive
plan
seeks
to
protect
and
Planning
Commission
staff
found
the
proposed
request
comparable
and
compatible
with
the
neighborhood
based
on
the
surrounding
land
use
pattern,
and
the
Planning
Commission
recommends
that
the
proposed
map
Amendment
be
found
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
Tampa
comprehensive
plan.
And
this
concludes
my
presentation.
If
you
have
any
questions.
B
W
Present,
my
name
is
yany
AB
newon
I'm,
an
engineer
for
spring
engineering,
we're
located
at
314,
US,
Highway
19
in
Holiday
Florida.
We
concur
with
the
findings
of
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
staff,
and
the
only
thing
I
really
want
to
add
is
that
have
an
area
here.
If
you
look
at
the
access
from
fer,
it
is
one
way
all
the
way
up
to
the
driveway
of
the
building
before
it
turns
two
ways.
W
So
it's
not
really
ideal
for
anything
less
than
commercial
and
the
goal
of
this
property
or
this
land
use
change
is
really
just
to
expand
the
dealership.
That's
there
now,
and
so
we
hope
you
can
look
at
that
and
improve
it.
W
Well,
if
also
have
Travis
Santos,
which
is
a
representative
for
the
applicant,
so
we
can
answer
any
question.
Try
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have.
B
Any
questions
for
the
gentleman
or
Mr
Santos-
no,
thank
you
very
much.
Do
we
have
anybody
in
the
public
that
wishes
to
speak
at
this
time?
On
item
number,
six,
to
close,
we
have
a
motion
to
close
from
council
member
Miranda
second
council
member
clendenon,
all
in
favor
I
council
member
Carlson.
If
you
would
mind,
reading
item
number
six.
I
Yes,
I'd
like
to
move
file
number
tcpa
23-14
ordinance
being
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
ordinance
amending
the
Tampa,
comprehensive
plan,
future
land
use
element,
future
land
use
map
for
the
property
located
at
113000
11414.
F
I
C
F
F
C
AE
AE
AE
Located,
as
you
see
where
the
property
is
located
here
outlined
in
red,
it
is
Zone
rm16
and
CI
commercial
intensive,
running
north
and
south
to
the
east
of
it
is
South.
Mcdill
Avenue
to
the
South
is
West
pal
Avenue
below
it.
You
have
an
Indian
restaurant
and
more
restaurants
and
Commercial
uses
to
the
north
is
Zone
CI
you
have
commercial
uses
and
all
above
you
have
residential
and
Commercial
uses
to
the
West.
You
have
more
residential
as
I'll
show
you
in
pictures
to
come
and
also
to
the
east.
AE
Site,
as
you
see,
it
is
let
me
back
up.
It
is
at
the
intersection
here,
south
mcdill
and
pom
Avenue.
The
ab
sales
being
requested
here
is
for
2,894
ft²
indoors
and
1,366
ft
Outdoors
for
a
total
Ab
sales
area
of
4,260
square
ft
all
being
located.
On
the
first
floor,
the
parking
required
is
22
spaces
and
provided
is
16
spaces,
as
I
will
cover.
Also
in
this
report,
the
sales
hours
operation
are
Tuesday
through
Thursday
5:00
p.m.
to
10:
p.m.
and
Friday
and
Saturday
5:00
p.m.
to
11:
p.m.
AE
the
lot
size
is
0.4
Acres,
the
building
height
is
22
ft
in
height
or
two
stories,
and
the
site
plan
states
that
there
will
be
no
Amplified
sound
after
after
11:00
p.m.
now.
There
are
being.
There
are
two
waivers
being
requested.
Two
waivers
being
requested
here
request
to
reduce
the
required
distance
separation
from
250
ft
to
20
ft
from
residential
uses,
and
the
second
one
is
to
request
to
reduce
the
require
distance
separation
from
250
ft
to
ZT
from
other
AB
sales
establishments.
AE
AE
Applicant,
as
you
see,
was
provided
by
the
applicant
in
my
staff
report.
It
is
stated
that
the
the
applicant
must
show
four
elevations,
including
given
directional
signs
of
north
south
east
and
west,
so
they'll
make
those
changes,
if
approved
via
this
hearing
between
first
and
second.
AE
Site
I'm
standing
on
Poma
to
the
South
public
notice,
sign
and
the.
AE
AE
AE
Currently,
one
more
picture,
looking
South,
you
have
DS
here
and
Flames
here,
I
think
you
also
have
Camp
10
Tampa
gym
right
behind.
AE
Time
the
development
review
and
compliance
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
request
to
be
inconsistent
with
the
city
of
Tempa
Cod
ordinances.
Now
there,
the
two
inconsistencies
are
due
to
those
two
waivers
being
requested
for
the
distance
separation
should
be
the
pledge
of
city
council
to
approve
the
application.
The
applicant
must
provide
revisions
to
the
revision
sheet,
which
is
within
the
staff
report
between
first
and
second
reading,
I'm
here
for
any
questions.
B
They
already
have
beer
and
wine
existing
correct,
okay,
councilwoman,
herch
and
then
Carlson.
L
I
Yeah
and
the
just
to
be
clear,
the
the
area
for
the
ab
is
only
nobody
can
see
my
finger,
but
it's
the
it's,
the
interior
of
just
the
restaurant
and
then
the
the
patio
of
the
restaurant,
not
the
other
parcel
and
not
the
parking
lot
right.
I
I
AC
Please
state
your
name
thank
you.
Mr
chair
and
Council
Jim
Porter
with
acran
41
East,
Jackson
Street,
as
as
Zan
alluded
to
this
is
BT.
Bt
has
been
at
this
and
part
of
Tampa
dining
history.
For
many
many
years,
she's
been
at
this
location
since
2010,
the
property
is
currently
wet,
zoned,
there's
an
existing
patio,
that
is
wet
zones,
and
so
the
purpose
of
tonight's
request
is
to
allow
alcohol
to
be
served
on
the
patio.
Again,
it's
been
a
good
part
of
the
Tampa
dining
scene
for
a
very
long
time.
AC
We
concur
with
the
staff
recommendation
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
You
have
just
to
be
clear
about
the
outdoor
patio.
This
is
the
area
commission,
councilwoman
herch
that
we're
talking
about
someone
can
I,
don't
know
that.
AA
T
AC
B
D
Thank
you.
Mr
chairman
item
number
n,
find
number
ab2,
23-18
ordance
being
for
first
reading,
consideration
an
ordinance
approving
a
special
use;
permid
S2
for
alcohol,
bage
sales,
restaurant
consumption
on
premise
only
and
making
lawful
the
sale
of
Beverage,
regardless
of
alcohol
content,
beer,
Wine
and
Liquor
on
that
lot.
On
that
certain
lot
plot
or
track
of
land
located
at
2507,
South,
magdale,
Avenue,
Tampa,
Florida,
more
particularly
describe
in
section
three
providing
that
all
ordinance
or
parts
of
ordinance
conflict
are
repealed.
Number
10,
10-47,
providing
an
effective.
D
I,
don't
have
the
revision
sheet
I'm.
Sorry.
G
AC
I
B
C
B
C
AE
AE
Property,
as
you
see
the
property
right
here
outlined
in
red
to
the
north,
you
have
West
Wilder
Avenue
to
the
South.
You
have
West
South
Avenue
to
the
East.
You
have
North
Armenia
Avenue
and
to
the
West.
You
have
North
Habana
Avenue
in
this
area.
You
have
a
mix
of
residential,
you
have
commercial,
you
have
a
a
a
gas
station
directly
north.
You
have
other
commercial
establishments
to
the
South
to
the
East.
You'll,
have
a
a
hospital
clinic
and
also
to
the
West
you'll.
AE
Applicant,
as
you
see
the
site
here
outlined
in
Yellow
by
the
applicant,
the
ab
sales
area
being
proposed
is
for
2,470
square
ft
indoors.
Only
this
is
on
the
first
floor.
Only
also
the
parking
required
is
44
parking
spaces
and
the
applicant
is
providing
44
parking
spaces.
The
hour
shall
be
consistent
with
chapter
14.
The
lot
size
is
for
0.06
Acres,
the
building
height
is
12
ft.
As
I
said
one
one
story:
there
are
two
waivers
being
requested.
AE
AE
This
is
the
rear
to
the
West
backside
of
the
restaurant.
You
have
two
more
pictures
of
the
rear
of
the.
AE
Restaurant
in
this
situation,
the
applicant
took
this
picture
to
the
northeast
of
the
restaurant.
Looking
at
the.
AE
AE
Armenia
directly
south
you
will
have
commercial
establishments,
including
a
tattoo
par
directly.
AE
Sell
also
directly
south
of
the
restaurant
you'll
have
two
salons
nail
salon
and
hair.
AE
Lot,
the
development
review
and
compliant
staff
has
reviewed
the
application
and
finds
the
overall
request
to
be
inconsistent
with
the
Land
Development
code,
and
this
is
due
to
this
two
waivers
due
to
distance
separation.
Should
it
be
the
pleasure
of
city
council
to
approve
the
application,
the
applicant
must
provide
revisions
to
the
revision
sheet,
which
is
within
the
staff
report
between
first
and
second
reading
I'm
here
for
any
questions.
V
Present
good
evening,
my
name
is
I'm
here
to
request
a
special
use:
two
liquor
beer
and
wine
for
laas
restaurant
that
is
established
for
from
2002.
We
already
have
beer
and
wine
in
there
with
some
and
what
that's
it.
B
B
T
Yes,
sir
I
move
an
ordinance
presented
for
first
reading,
consideration
ordinance,
approving
special
use,
permit
S2
for
alcoholic
beverage
sales,
restaurant
consumption
on
premises
only
and
making
lawful
sale
of
beverages,
regardless
of
alcoholic
content,
beer,
Wine
and
Liquor.
On
that
certain
lot
plot
or
attractive
land
located
at
5004,
North
Araina
Avenue
Tampa
floor
is
more
particular
described
in
Section
3.
Providing
the
all
ordinances
or
parts
of
ordinance
and
conflicts
are
appeal,
repealing
ordinance,
number
24291,
providing
an
effective
dat.
B
We
have
motion
from
council
member
Vier,
second
council
member
fennon
roll
call
vote.
D
C
I
Sir,
just
before
I
make
a
motion,
it
just
see
what
you
all
think
about
this
idea.
If
you
don't
like
it,
I
won't
make
a
motion,
but.
I
Sorry
I
know
we're
all
tired,
yeah,
no
I'm,
not
a
baseball
fan
I'm,
not
a
sports
fan
to,
but.
I
But
but
Tampa
and
St
Peter
worked
really
hard
to
try
to
keep
the
raise
in
the
region
and
I
think
it
would
be
a
Goodwill
gesture
for
our
chair
on
our
behalf
to
send
a
letter
to
mayor,
Welch
and
I.
Think
Brandy
Gabbert
is
the
chair
of
the
city
city
council
to
congratulate
them
on
the
initial
deal
and
to
wish
them
well
in
negotiating
a
deal
to
keep
the
raise
in
the
region.
D
D
D
B
I
G
I
do
need
to
make
up,
though,
because
when
I
ran
into
mayor
Welsh,
not
too
long
before
this,
this
coup
of
stealing
our
baseball
team
I
walked
up
to
him
at
the
suite,
and
the
first
thing
I
said
to
him
was
not
Hello,
not
anything.
I
said
I'm,
sorry
in
advance
for
stealing
your
baseball
team,
so
he
goes
his
responible.
D
I
I
I'll
just
I'll
just
personally
congratulate
them,
yeah
and
I
know.
He's
he's
worked
really
hard
over
at
least
10
years
to
do
this,
so
I
wish
them
well.
Thank.
T
Yes,
sir
tonight
yeah
just
really
quick
if
I
may
I
think
actually
I,
don't
know
yes,
one
one,
but
that
I
think
think
everybody
here
will.
T
Didn't
disappoint
us
I
know
right,
but
the
and
actually
this
is
going
to
cut
down
on
time.
I
had
motion
for
discussion
on
municipal
bonds
for
fire
stations
on
October
5th.
We
have
a
really
packed
agenda.
I
think
it's
better
to
do
on
October
26th.
If
I
may
I
support.
T
I
I,
thank
you
Council.
Next
again,
this
will
also
shorten
the
agenda
on
October.
19Th
I
was
going
to
have
the
veterans
treatment,
Court
Mentor
come
and
discuss
their
10year
anniversary
with
a
for
ACC
Commendation,
which
is
going
to
be
given
off
site
now.
So
I
would
like
to
number
one
remove
off
that
the
agenda
and
then
welcome
Ashley
odm
and
her
son
Brody
to
discuss
Down
syndrome
awareness
month
for
five
minutes.
T
Favor
and
then
here's
the
Commendation
November
will
Mark
60
years
of
membership
in
the
Florida
bar
for
judge
EJ
salinus
and
would
like
to
invite
judge
salinus
to
come
to
Tampa,
City
Council
and
speak
to
us
for
no
more
than
9
hours
on.
B
T
B
We
have
a
motion
from
council
member
Vieira
to
welcome,
judge,
SZ
and
limit
him
to
9
hours,
second
from
councilwoman,
her
attch,
all
in
favor
I,
and
that's
it.
Thank
you,
council,
member
Miranda.
Yes,.
D
Sir
I'll
have
one
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
present
accommodation
to
the
revenue
finance
budget
staff
to
recognize
them
for
receiving
the
governmental
finance
officer.
Association
distinguished
budget
presentation
award
for
fisical
year,
beginning
October.
21.
Excuse
me
October
1
of
2022.
This
award
is
for
the
highest
form
of
recognition
and
government
budget
on
105
of
23.
If
possible,.