►
From YouTube: Tampa City Council 11212019 part 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
B
C
Rest
to
the
chair
chairman
Vieira
and
sandy
Marshall,
we
respectfully
request
a
continuance
for
file
number
E
2019,
a
chapter
27
scheduled
to
be
heard
before
the
City
Council
of
the
city
of
Tampa
on
December
21st
2019
at
10:30
a.m.
we
request
the
continuance
to
the
next
available
time
in
the
cycle
of
hearings.
Please
let
me
know
any
further
information
is
needed.
Thank
you
and
it's
from
attorney.
Amanda
Brewer.
D
D
Earlier
this
week,
when
I
got
the
staff
reported,
this
application
can't
go
forward,
as
is
the
applicants
representative,
David
singer
was
notified
of
that
and
I'm
not
sure.
If
he's
had
an
opportunity
to
speak
to
his
client
or
not,
we
did
receive
late
yesterday
afternoon.
Our
request
to
have
it
continued,
I
guess
too
late
to
get
on
your
addendum.
C
C
F
E
C
No,
but
if
I
may
just
explain
to
the
public,
then
this
would
be
continued
to
the
20th
of
February
and
I.
Guess,
if
there's
an
opportunity
that
somebody
has
an
issue
with
that
particular
date
yang
that
you
would
hear
this
the
entire
morning,
you
would
have
the
opportunity
to
address
the
council.
Otherwise
a
motion
could
be
made
by
City
Council
and
the
only
notice
that
you
would
have
would
be
the
notice
that
you
get
today
hearing
it
as
to
the
next
date
and
time
so.
E
A
A
D
Assistant
city
attorney
I'm
here
on
item
80.
This
is
a
petition
for
review
of
a
request
for
a
design
exception.
It
is
a
property
owner.
That's
appealing
city
staff
reviewed
the
case
and
found
this.
The
applicant
or
the
petitioner
had
not
met
the
applicable
standard.
So
this
is
a
de
novo
review,
so
you'll
be
able
to
take
all
new
evidence.
However,
you
will
have
to
apply
the
same
criteria.
The
Zoning
Administrator
applies
that
is
found
on
page
2
of
your
staff.
Support
and
I'll
be
handing
out
sample
motions
for
you
all.
E
E
F
F
General
map
for
the
property,
the
request
was
to
increase
the
fence
height
from
6
feet
to
the
vault
feet.
Mr.
McLean
II
has
indicated
that
the
fence
may
be
actually
a
bit
shorter
than
16.
It
may
be
only
12
feet,
I'm
excusing
9
feet
instead
of
12
feet,
but
all
that
mr.
McLean
again
is
a
little
bit
when
he
comes
up
to
explain
his
request.
F
The
property
zoned
rf60,
which
is
residential
single-family
in
rf60,
the
typical
maximum
price
for
fences
6
feet
back
in
1994
they
did
receive
a
Board
of
Adjustment
case,
would
would
be
considered
a
variance
to
increase
the
height
of
the
fence
from
6
feet
to
8
feet
that
was
previously
approved.
Now
the
fence
height
is
along
the
drive.
It's
in
this
area
back
over
through
here.
F
It
was
the
determination,
the
Zoning
Administrator
or
my
determination
at
the
time
that
there
was
insufficient
evidence
to
support
the
increase
in
the
height
of
event
of
a
fence
from
basically
doubling
with
100
percent
increase
from
from
6
of
fall,
and
this
is
the
view
of
the
property
from
Bayshore.
That's
the
front
entrance
and
these
two
pictures
reflect.
F
These
two
pictures
reflect
the
fence
itself
and
you
can
see
a
little
bit
in
the
back
and
see
some
of
the
ball
court
in
the
back
or
the
tennis
court,
and
this
is
just
again
that's
just
the
fence
in
the
Maya
Pina
at
the
time
when
I
was
there
doing
it,
it
was
a
100
percent
increases
are
very
large
and
tall
fence
without
justification
to
support
looking
to
support
it.
The
applicant
head
back
the
time
had
not
said
and
not
submitted
any
additional
evidence
to
support
the
injuries.
What.
G
F
F
F
F
H
Good
afternoon
counsel,
Steve
Mecca
Laney,
representing
John
and
Elizabeth
Theophilus.
They
are
the
the
property
owners
I'm
going
to
go
through
a
series
of
pictures
and
site
plans,
showing
you
exactly
what
what
is
existing
on
on
this
site
right
now.
But
one
of
the
things
that
you
need
to
note
is
that
this
is
a
through
lot.
It
goes
all
the
way
from
Bayshore
to
Alice
and
they
own
approximately
88
thousand
square
feet,
which
is
nearly
2
acres
of
property
and
their
their
issue
involves.
Amelia
show
you
here.
H
H
Top
of
the
wall,
the
existing
wall
from
here
down,
is
eight
feet
and
that
was
previously
approved.
So
that
part
is
not
in
violation.
This
part
from
here
down
to
this
way
is,
is
eight
feet,
so
that
part
is
not
in
violation.
There's
a
section
right
in
here
where
they
added
a
screen
on
top
of
the
wall.
Now,
there's
a
great
differential
between
the
inside
and
the
outside,
but
the
outside
measurement
for
here
is
about
nine
feet.
Six
inches
and
you
can
see.
Ls
drive
is
right
here,
so
the
wall
doesn't
create
a
sight
obstruction.
H
H
H
G
H
This
is
another
view
of
Ellis.
Now
this
this
house
right
here,
is
one
that
they
that
they
own
and
they
own
the
next
two
houses
over
here.
So
there
is
no
impact
on
any
adjacent
property
owner.
This
is
a
view.
Looking
south
and
again
they
own.
This
house
and
I
met
with
the
gentleman
to
rent
her
there,
and
he
was
very
happy
to
be.
H
G
H
Where
you
see
the
stair
stepping
occurs,
this
is
at
8
feet
here.
This
is
at
9
feet
a
little
over
9
feet
here,
and
this
is
a
screen
that
goes
up
another
3
feet
and
then
that
the
screen
is
there
instead
of
a
wall,
because
this
this
oak
tree,
this
is
a
grand
oak,
it
extends
out
and
over
the
wall,
so
they
were
trying
to
do
something
that
was
less
obtrusive.
This
is
a
closer
view
and
you
can
see
the
screen
here.
H
All
of
this
all
of
this
wall
is,
it
meets
the
8
feet,
and
none
of
that
none
of
that
encroaches
into
what
was
what
was
not
previously
approved.
There's
another
view
to
show
you
that
your
traffic
is
actually
driving
away
from
the
wall,
so
it
doesn't
create
sight
obstructions.
It
doesn't
create
any
adverse
impacts
on
transportation
or
the
driveway
or
access
of
anytime.
H
H
H
H
It's
12
feet.
This
is
MacDill
and
el
prado
12
feet
another
picture
of
UT
and
will
they
have
permission
to
go
up
to
75
feet?
The
wall
that
they
have
on
the
front
is
eight
to
ten
feet
high
and
then
the
screening
goes
up
to.
They
have
permission
to
go
up
to
75
feet.
This
is
a
MacDill
just
north
of
Gandhi.
H
H
Let
me
go
through
the
criteria
for
you
very
quickly
that
it's
located
on
the
western
edge
of
the
property
at
the
right-of-way
of
Ellis.
It
makes
a
90-degree
turn
to
the
north.
It
does
not
adversely
affect
or
physically
impaired
the
transportation
aspects
of
this
property
or
any
other
traversing
property
of
vehicles
with
the
individuals
traveling
on
Ellis
eastbound,
it
does
have
a
regard
for
the
safety
and
security
of
their
property.
The
westernmost
edge
is
remote
and
difficult
to
monitor.
H
H
From
this
photograph,
it's
extremely
large
parcel.
It's
it's!
It's
really
in
a
state
and
it's
all
under
single
ownership.
So
we're
talking
about
this
little
corner
in
here
and
it's
30
feet
33
feet
long.
It
there's
a
hundred
and
seven
sixty
seven
feet
of
run
across
that
property
line.
So
there's
a
hundred
and
thirty
some-odd
feet
that
is
in
compliance
and
33
feet.
That's
not.
H
The
general
intent
of
the
code
has
been
met
in
terms
of
the
comprehensive
plan
that
these
are.
This
is
a
very
large
parcel
of
land.
It's
a
remote
section
of
the
property,
it's
very
hard
to
secure
and
maintain.
They
have
a
constant
monitoring
service
with
a
security
company,
and
the
security
company
has
indicated
that
they
do
have
intrusion
issues
along
that
side.
H
The
exception
that's
being
requested
is
due
to
the
existing
site
conditions
and
it's
a
reasonable
consideration
based
upon
the
size
of
the
property
that
they
own
and
the
issues
that
they're
dealing
with
the
request
is
apparent.
But
the
conditions
of
approval
include
the
location
at
the
end
of
a
90
degree,
turn
of
the
right
away
and
the
potential
liability
created
by
the
private
recreational
facilities,
the
remote
location
of
the
property
and
the
lack
of
adjacent
other
property
owners.
H
H
There
are
safety
and
security
concerns
and,
as
indicated
by
the
ADT
letter,
they
have
had
intrusion
issues.
The
request
is
consistent
with
all
the
applicants,
standards
and
specific
plans
for
the
property,
and
this
is
a
unique
situation.
I
would
I
would
venture
to
say
there
are
very
few
properties
anywhere
throughout
the
city
that
are
this
large
and
have
remote
conditions.
H
Have
that
many
trees
that
they're
working
around
so
they
have
done
a
good
job
at
trying
to
preserve
the
trees,
work
around
them
and
also
create
a
safety
enclosure
for
their
family
they're
in
the
process
they
the
own
another
parcel.
Well,
you
can
see
it
up
here
they
own
another
parcel
here.
They
are
constantly
trying
to
secure
this
whole
area
for
themselves
and
and
their
family,
and
they
have
done
it
the
best
job
that
they
can
do
to
try
to
to
create
a
safe
atmosphere
for
their
families
and
guests.
H
Here
is
a
close-up
picture
of
the
security
lighting
that
they've
installed
outside
the
wall
and
that's
all
along
the
wall.
They've
installed
their
own
lights,
to
kind
of
try
to
minimize
the
ability
to
people
to
climb
over.
But
you
can
see
the
limbs
of
this
grand
ok
here
they
go
across
the
wall
and
that's
where
the
screen
begins
right
at
the
edge
of
that
limb
and
it
extends
33
feet.
H
This
way
so
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
have
I
believe
they've
met
the
burden
of
proof
as
applied
by
the
city
code,
and
there
are
numerous
other
examples
that
are
unique
throughout
the
city
where
they
have
applied
safety
considerations
and
concerns,
and
these
folks
have
gone
to
extraordinary
lengths
to
try
to
minimize
the
impact.
It's
not
visible
to
any
other
property
owner,
except
for
driving
straight
down
the
street
and
in
that
portion
is
at
8
feet
not
to
12
feet.
Thank.
A
B
B
B
I
can
understand
where
someone
can
climb
that
tree
and
then
hop
over
the
fence
of
why
they
would
need
that
that
extension
of
the
height,
also
it's
a
it's
a
dark,
poorly
lit
area,
so
people
can,
as
it
sits
people
can
hide
their
top
over
the
fence
and
and
potentially
break
in
I.
Don't
know
how
their
security
is,
but
I
think
it's
a
unique
situation.
I
think
it
meets.
You
know
the
general
standards
that
we
have
in
our
code.
I,
don't
I,
don't
see
an
issue
with
it.
B
A
H
They
are
the
neighborhood
of
appalled,
the
adjacent
property
owners,
so
I
haven't
received
any
phone
calls
and
I
have
not
been
advised
by
letter
or
otherwise
emails
of
any
objections
to
this.
Thank
you.
Mister
I
did
meet
like
I
said:
I
did
meet
with
a
couple
of
the
neighbors
while
I
was
out,
there
posting
the
sign,
and
you
know
we're
taking
pictures
and
all
that,
and
they
were
just
curious
about.
They
said
why
does
somebody
objecting
to
this
wall?
We're
happy
with
it?
So
I
didn't
hear
anything
other
than
that.
Thank.
E
A
E
B
So
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
overturn
the
zoning
administration
administrator's
denial
of
design
exception
for
application
fall
number
II,
2019
a
chapter
27
because
the
petitioner
has
demonstrated
the
petition
is
consistent
with
the
standards
set
forth.
Herein
in
section
27
65
G
applicant
has
provided
plenty
of
documentation,
comparisons
to
other
properties
in
the
city
and
has
proven
the
uniqueness
of
this
residential
parcel
and
wide
issue.
So
I.
B
E
D
You
Rebecca
cart
assistant
to
the
attorney
I'm
Karen
item.
81
81
is
another
review
hearing,
which
means
it's
also
de
novo
hearing
you
will
be
hearing
new
evidence.
This
is
a
different
type
of
petition.
However,
this
is
a
special
use
request,
as
opposed
to
design
exception.
As
you
will
recall,
a
special
use
request
is
a
request
that
is
a
permitted
use
in
the
area.
If
they
meet
certain
criteria,
this
would
have
been
administratively
approved,
except
it
did
not
meet
one
of
the
criteria.
D
Therefore,
it
has
to
come
to
you
for
a
waiver
and
that's
what
you're
considering
today.
I
would
call
to
your
attention
that
this
is
a
criteria
that
City
Council
has
previously
I
believe
made
a
motion
to
have
changed.
However,
that
hasn't
happened
yet
so
they
still
have
to
come
before
you
for
a
waiver.
This
is
for
acessory
dwelling
unit
and
I
will
have
staff,
explain
the
request
in
more
detail,
but
I
will
pass
out
simple
motions,
be
consider.
Thank
you.
Ma'am.
F
F
F
Property
show
you
the
submitted
site
plan.
The
reason
for
the
denial,
a
as
you're
aware
of
the
one
of
the
criteria
for
the
special
use
for
accessory
going
units
is
that
it
can't
be
in
a
place
into
a
into
a
structure.
That's
non-conforming!
This
structure
is
only
0.7
feet
from
the
property
line
and
used
to
be
a
minimum
of
3
feet.
Therefore,
it's
not
conforming.
So
at
the
staff
level,
we
have
to
deny
the
request,
because
it
can't
get
all
the
special
use
criteria.
Then
they
come
before
council
or
as
a
provision
for
review.
F
The
top
picture
is
the
French
structure
of
the
house,
where
the
van
is
parked.
That's
the
accessory
structure
and
in
the
staff
report,
I
have
the
same
picture
for
both
the
North
and
South
properties,
which
is
not
correct.
So
this
is
the
southern
property
that's
adjacent
to
her.
This
is
the
Norden
property.
Both
ranch
styles
for
health
is
a
bungalow
and
the
wardens
any
questions
they
want
everything
for
you.
Any
questions.
E
I
Good
afternoon,
thank
you
for
your
time
today,
I'm
Kelley
Santos
on
the
owner
of
4405
Northland
Avenue.
My
intent
is
to
convert
my
garage
to
a
one
bedroom
kitchen
bath
apartment.
It's
it's
508
square
feet.
It's
a
detached
garage.
My
main
home
is
a
thousand
80
square
feet.
There
are
two
issues
that
I'm
asking
unappealing.
The
first
is
a
setback
and
I'm
asking
that
there
be
a
design
exception
to
reduce
the
south's
Southside
setback
of
garage
from
3
feet
to
existing
condition.
This
garage
was
built
in
1964
and
has
been
fascist
for
55
years.
I
The
second
is
parking.
My
boundary
survey
shows
two
legal
parking
spaces
and
I'm
asking
for
a
waiver
to
reduce
the
required
parking
spaces
from
three
to
two.
My
reasoning
is
this:
I
am
the
only
person
that
lives
in
the
home
I
have
one
car
I
plan
to
live
there
for
the
rest
of
my
life.
Due
to
the
nature,
the
the
footprint
of
the
home
being
a
thousand
eighty
square
feet,
I
think
it'll,
probably
go
forward,
be
best
suited
for
a
single
person,
a
couple
or
a
couple
with
a
small
child.
I
A
A
A
E
E
It
led
me
to
the
idea
of
private
prison
labor
where
there
is
so
much
exploitation,
and
there
was
such
a
vast
expansion
of
these
kind
of
institutions
that
are
prone
to
exploitation.
In
our
time
in
2016,
then
Obama
administration
had
moved
to
curtail
the
use
of
federal
funds
for
private
prison
labor,
and
then
they
have
been
vastly
expanded
under
the
present
administration
and
and
I
just
want
to
do
everything
that
we
can
to
oppose
these
I
feel
very
passionate
about
it.
E
E
B
F
C
E
E
H
G
E
G
G
So
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
allowing
her
to
come
here
and
share
the
ideas
that
they're,
bringing
especially
members
of
community
business
agreements,
land
banking
and
a
lot
of
the
things
that
they're
trying
to
transfer
me
to
do
for
that
community,
which
is
really
prospering.
As
you
see
so,
I
hate
for
legal
and
folks
to
do
a
lot
of
work.
These
are
pressing
times
right
now,
and
people
are
demanding
answers
and
wanting
changing
the
world
is
changing.
We
have
to
kind
of
change
with
it.
G
So
this
time,
I
like
to
make
a
motion
for
the
real
estate
division
and
legal
department
to
bring
a
detailed
report
before
Council
on
land
banking,
for
the
city
of
Tampa,
for
the
possibility
of
creation
of
an
organism
for
adoption.
I
like
this
to
be
presented
at
a
meeting
on
March
26
2020,
that's
the
workshop
in.
A
C
G
A
general
overview
of
what
what
what
what
we
could
bring
forth
in
this
city,
so
it
could
be
housing
whatever
I
just
wanted.
There
Jimmy
tell
what
land
making
is
a
couple.
People
can
know
what
lane
making
is.
What's
the
purpose
of
it,
how
can
it
be
utilized?
How
can
the
city
build
utilize
and
how
can
communities.
C
A
Mr.
chairman
and
council
members
I
wish
to
thank
you
and
joining
me
on
this
letter
to
our
legislative
delegation
about
preemption
all
right.
Thank
you
very
much,
I'd
like
to
thank
the
legal
department,
I'd
like
to
thank
the
administration
and
again
thank
you.
Tim
Heather
lined
my
aid
for
drafting
this
up
nothing
more
today.
Thank.
A
You
chairman
had
two
items:
one
regarding
affordable
housing
requests,
the
City
Attorney's
Office
to
research,
the
city's
ability
to
use
a
nonprofit
organization
to
raise
private
funds
to
create
a
pool
of
money
to
support
and
provide
a
photo
by
housing,
assistance
or
programs
and
report
back
to
us
20th
of
2020.
Second,.
A
I
need
a
post
and
number
two,
sir
opportunity's
own
request:
the
City
Attorney's
Office
of
Research
and
prepare
presentation
of
City
Council
regarding
creation,
operation
and
benefits
of
Opportunity
Zones,
and
to
include
any
private
companies
or
persons
who
have
created
or
used
Opportunity
Zones
and
the
results
and
advantages
and
to
report
back
and
make
a
presentation
of
February
6
2020.
So
I
could
thank
you.
C
C
E
Briefly,
if
I
may
just
two
small
things,
I
motion
for
a
commendation,
this
2019
will
actually
be
the
hundred
and
twenty-fifth
anniversary
of
an
organization.
I
love
a
lot
I
got
to
work
with
him
in
the
Warrior
Games,
the
Jewish,
War
veterans
of
america.
They
were
started
to
combat
anti-semitism,
promote
the
patriotism
of
our
Jewish
Americans,
who
serve
and
combat
that
idea
that
we
still
fight
today
of
dual
loyalty
and
I
I
motion
did
that
be
held
at
regular
council
on
march
19th
of
2019.
B
E
C
C
There
are
two
things
that
are
coming
up
next.
There
actually
is
one
item
coming
up
on
the
December
5th,
which
is
your
next
regular
meeting,
which
is
a
legal
department
to
prepare
and
provide
options
as
a
related
to
chapter
14
of
the
city
of
Tampa
ordinances,
specifically
addressing
hours
of
operation
amplified
outdoor
sound
as
well
as
distance
separation.
He
is
requesting
counsel
to
make
a
motion
please
to
take
that
off
the
December
5th
2019
agenda
and
put
that
at
10:00
a.m.
when
Katherine
coil
is
going
to
be
present
added
to
the
create
a
10:00
a.m.
C
A
C
Sorry
you're
so
agreeable:
okay,
is
it
86
and
87?
Yes,
the
chapter
27,
the
5%
of
the
dimensional
criteria
and
number
87
is
the
discussion
and
history
of
the
bonus
dead,
City
pros
and
cons
he's
asking
each
one
of
those
items
also
be
set
as
a
workshop.
Each
at
10:00
a.m.
because
Katherine
coil
will
be
here
that
morning
again
to
remove
to
change
that
day
to
the
workshop
on
February
27th.